January 21, 2008
Posted: January 21st, 2008 01:15 PM ET

MYRTLE BEACH, South Carolina (CNN) – More tit-for-tat on the campaign trail – only this time, it’s between Barack Obama and Bill Clinton.

After losing the caucus tally in Nevada, the Obama campaign took aim at Bill Clinton and the comments he made during his many campaign stops in that state on behalf of his wife, Hillary Clinton.

Now the Illinois senator himself is taking on the former president, telling Good Morning America that he feels as if he’s running against both Clintons.

In the interview, Obama said that the former president has been misrepresenting both “my record of opposition to the war in Iraq” and “our approach to organizing in Las Vegas,” as the controversy over Saturday’s Nevada caucus vote continues to grow.

Obama campaign senior adviser David Axelrod did not back away from the remarks after they became public Sunday night, telling CNN the Clintons “have a good cop, bad cop thing going” in which “he comes with a negative message she stays positive.”

Axelrod accuses the former President of “doing slash and burn stuff,” and slams the Clinton campaign, saying “there’s a philosophy of saying and doing anything it takes.”

“It’s very clear that Bill Clinton is playing fast and loose with the facts,” says Axelrod, and unbecoming of a former president: “It’s been a little crass, as someone who supported him and respects him, I think it’s disappointing.”

And Axelrod vows Obama will continue to hit back. “As long as he’s out there, we aren’t going to let him distort the record,” he says. “We’ll aggressively challenge him when he misrepresents the facts.”
More...

He also calls on the former president to stop distorting Obama's record. “If he wants to help his wife, just be honest - don’t parse words, don’t truncate quotes to make your case.”

The ABC interview with Obama has yet to air, but the Clinton camp is already fighting back.

“We understand Sen. Obama is frustrated by his loss in Nevada, but the facts are the facts,” said campaign spokesperson Phil Singer. “President Clinton is a huge asset to our campaign and will continue talking to the American people.”

The new brawl comes as the battle between the two camps over the Nevada vote shows no signs of abating, with both sides accusing the other of voter intimidation.

On Sunday, Obama’s Nevada State Director David Cohen said there had been a “clear-cut disenfranchising” of voters in the state because of actions by Clinton supporters, and the campaign's general counsel, Bob Bauer, said they were asking the state and national party to investigate.

Clinton spokesman Howard Wolfson called the allegations “absurd” and “laughable,” and spokesman Phil Singer responded charged that “Sen. Obama’s allies in Nevada engaged in strong arm tactics and intimidation against our supporters.”

Singer also repeated former President Clinton’s charge that the senator’s record on the war had been “inconsistent.”

–CNN's Jessica Yellin</div

Filed under: Barack Obama • Hillary Clinton • South Carolina primary


Some Terms Pertaining To Substance Abuse Treatment That You Must Know | Chemical Agents   May 23rd, 2009 9:34 pm ET

[...] CNN Political Ticker: All politics, all the time Blog Archive ... [...]

vicky smart   January 25th, 2008 1:17 pm ET

Sen. Obama should stop replying the Clintons, and tell the country his plan.
They (the Clintons and the Press) are using this method to distract your goal.
Be focus and ignore them quickly.

C.S. Dachet   January 25th, 2008 6:16 am ET

Well, I think all hope is not lost for Obama. Every obstacle could be an opportunity for a miracle. Obama could use this heated attack to prove his maturity and make an impact. An eye for an eye may not always play out well. Where there is hatred bring love, where there is strive bring calm. Obama's posture in this can serve him both good and bad. The Clinton are bomarding Obama to get him frustrated and distablized. It is a strategy to bring out the worst in him.

SJM   January 24th, 2008 6:39 pm ET

The MAJOR DIFFERENCE between what Bill and Hillary are doing, and Barak and Michelle are doing is this:

ANY TIME MO makes a derogatory statement, it is attributed to Barack.

Whereas Hillary Clinton is attempting to play innocent. Notice in the debate, when Obama responded to one of Bill's attacks upon him, she stated, "He's not here" "I didn't say that"– BULL! She is as responsible for Bill's role in the campaign as Barack is for Michelle's– and it's repulsive to me that she's being such a hypocrite.

I was actually sympathetic towards her, too– now I see why so many people despise Hillary Clinton.

(Still would probably vote for her over a Repub, though)

Gilbert   January 23rd, 2008 2:39 pm ET

Keep up the hope and fight on Barack! You surely are competing against a former
President and a First Lady. If you prevail it will be like winning against an incumbent; if you lose it will be because you are fighting against two odds.
As for the Clintons its clear they are trying to go round the constitution and get back to the White House for another term. Otherwise what's so important for them that they want to achieve that they could not do in the eight years they were in the White House? I think the Clintons' agenda to go back to The White House is personal and not for America's sake. They must be anxious to repair the damages caused by Bill's escapades in the corridors of the White House among other things. This whole thing is just too personal for Clintons!

PATTY   January 22nd, 2008 12:38 pm ET

CNN DEMOCRATS ALL THE WAY-OBAMA IS YOUR MAN! I WILL NEVER WATCH CNN AGAIN! WHAT A BRUNCH OF CRAT!

Lauren   January 22nd, 2008 11:12 am ET

with everything that is going on in the world i don't think time need to be spent on who did what and when. tell me what you intend to do to bring us out of this mess we are in in iraq, the economy, social security and health care. after the debate last night any respect i had for hillery clinton was lost. it seems like as soon as she starts slipping in the poles she starts attacking obama. hillery please talk about what you intend to do when you become president. let your husband leave the campaign trail and go charm the women.

Another VA Independent   January 22nd, 2008 10:29 am ET

WAY TO GO BILL!!! Why didn't you just cut to the chase, go on CNN and say "Don't vote for my wife because she can't possibly do the job by herself!" Seriously, what a way to undermine your wife...I bet she never saw that coming too. You just couldn't stay out of the light could you? It's almost like watch reality show with celebrities in rehab. I would think anyone with half a brain would wake up and finally realize that is is exactly why Hillary Clinton was always the worst possible presidential candidate because of one simple fact – WAY TOO MUCH BAGGAGE!!!!!

Yep, we Americans do have the shortest memories in the world. Do you know how many old republicans will come out of the woodwork just to vote against her? And another note...do we really want her as President with the full understanding (and they've both made it perfectly clear) that she's going to depend on the advice from a man who continuously lied to her before, AND THE COUNTRY? Yeah, so he's not the first Prez to get caught with his pants down. At least they weren't stupid enought to go on national television and lie about it. Oh, and if you're going to constantly lie as world leader, at least let it be for a good reason like assasination, arms deals, you know, important crap it!!!!

Oh yeah, and let's not forget about the Republicans. I'm sure they just couldn't wait for this insanity to start. They knew it was coming/ I bet right now, they're probably all holding hands, jumping up and down, skipping around in circles. With a little patience, they can simply step back and wait for the Clinton's do what they've always done - self destruct.

So Bill, YOU'RE NOT RUNNING - LET IT GO! And Hillary, if you REALLY want to be taken seriously and get your shot at the "big chair", get your husband in check and fight your own battles. Then again, maybe this IS the only way you have a chance of winning against the "Boys".

Elias   January 22nd, 2008 6:58 am ET

why are Hillary and Bill Clinton deliberatly attacking Obama? This Shows they have no confidence on themselves. At least Obama knows the Americans national anthem. Hillary, before critisizing someone like Obama, first you have to know the national anthem! ha ha ha!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ed   January 22nd, 2008 6:34 am ET

go hillary

Skip   January 22nd, 2008 5:51 am ET

Of course Obama did not suspect he would be running against two Clintons because he made the reasonable assumption that President Clinton would respect the decorum and dignity of the Presidency at least to the extent that Bush senior did in 2000 when junior ran. His mistake was that he underestimated the depravity of the Clintons. I supported Bill Clinton in 92' and 96' but have been utterly appalled at the gutter campaign the Clintons have waged against Barack Obama.

dandubya   January 22nd, 2008 2:22 am ET

boo hoo hoo, poor Obama is being picked on. It would be nice if we were in a world where politics didn't center around not your own merits so much, but on the faults of your opponents. Don't throw the mud if you can't stand getting dirty senator.

Matt   January 22nd, 2008 1:11 am ET

Why does CNN delete your posts if you mention that Hillary got elected because her husband pardoned criminals for votes in a state she did not even live in. Can't handle the truth or do you secretly still love her and the Clintons?

The only thing scarier than the Clintons lies, scandels and dirty deeds is the fact that they still have so called media outlets in their back pocket.

Don't be fooled this is still the Clinton News Network.

Ryk   January 22nd, 2008 1:08 am ET

Jessica said that "Hillary is the strongest, most-accomplished, intelligent woman in the Democratic Party. " Sadly I couldn't agree more.
Not great praise for Democrat women.

anti obama   January 21st, 2008 11:58 pm ET

NEVER OBama...only hillary or STAY AT HOME IN NOV....

stamp7   January 21st, 2008 11:24 pm ET

When Senator Clinton was referring to "us" and "we" during the debate, was she referring to the former president and her? If so, wasn't it interesting that she distanced herself from him in responding to Senator Obama's reference to the former president's distortion of Obama's remarks about Reagan? Does she get to play both sides of the game?

visual9   January 21st, 2008 11:05 pm ET

I would be pleased if Hillary becomes president because she is first female-president.
And also I would be pleased if Obama becomes president because he is first African-American president.
And I also pleased if one becomes president because she is first African-American female president.
and Hyspenic, Asian....

So.. please just win the Democrats!

Dean   January 21st, 2008 11:04 pm ET

So Senator Obama doesn't know who he is running against. Perhaps this man who many say is a gifted orator should keep in mind the words of a fellow Democrat, one who had great gifts with the spoken word and a deep well of strength to help him wage the battles necessary to effect real change. Those words were "I do not run for the Presidency merely to oppose any man but to propose new policies. I run because I am convinced that this country is on a perilous course and because I have such strong feelings about what must be done, and I feel that I'm obliged to do all I can." That candidate was Robert F. Kennedy.

Senator Obama, you are no Robert F Kennedy. He would never characterize President Reagan as "transformative" and leave listeners to believe it was a favorable characterization. Reagan was diametrically opposed to everything, everything, RFK stood for, worked for, and died fighting for!

Transformative!! At the end of 1980 the cumulative National Debt stood at $930,210,000,000 (that's billion with a "b"). When he left office it stood at $2,684,392,000,000. In Short, in eight years, Reagan nearly tripled a debt it took over 200 years to accumulate, pushing it up to $2,684,392,000,000. That 2.7 trillion! This after running a campaign that said we could cut taxes, increase spending on the military, AND BALANCE THE BUDGET. Man, that's transformation! No, a better characterization would be a BIG, FAT, LIE.

If Senator Obama isn't even willing to take on the myth of Republicant fiscal responsibility, to take on the lodestar of Republicant fiscal irresponsibility, namely, Ronald Reagan, then what is he willing to stand up and fight for?

Senator Obama, it is one thing to reach across the aisle to, it's another to seep their transgressions under the rug and help perpetuate one of the worst lies in American history. That lie is that Republicants are fiscally responsible.

Hillaryinthehouse   January 21st, 2008 10:55 pm ET

I am a black female

I am obligated to the oval office to place the best person in the white house, not the black person, white person. latino person, female person, or male person.

Hillary is my chose.

Some democrate and independent voters made a big mistake voting for GWB in 2000 believing in the 'change' 'family value' and 'likable' slogan, i bet they reget their vote.

GWB turn into a monster.

Democrate and independent voters allow theyself to be side tracked by Bush and Carl Rove to punish Al Gore for Clinton Sins.

Now everybody to complaine about the BUSH CLINTON DYNASTY, people you had the chance to end the dynasty in 2000, don't punish Hillary for your mistake.

kay   January 21st, 2008 10:40 pm ET

Obama isn't whining. He has to answer the Clintons lies. The country is on to them by now. Bill is a discrase. Even the dem. elites such as Kennedy and Kerry are for Obama.
The repubs want Hillary. They can sure run against her.
Hillary wants Edwards to stay in to take votes from Obama.

Aaron Thomas   January 21st, 2008 10:34 pm ET

My comment is that our four fathers( who were human),wrote the political process to elect ONE president to run this country ,Why are we so complacent and won't rewrite that process,(We are Human) Have a group of people to run this country. This country is made up of many races and two genders. This is a great chance to have them all.
P.S. I like them all ,They all have great points. Why do I have to choose ONE?

I Like the number 5.

DEWITT   January 21st, 2008 10:31 pm ET

Jack,

Why are you annoyed by my comment? Don't you see any thruth to it? We are a society of 300, 000, 000. Does someone need to be a family of Bush or Clinton to be a president?

I will never vote for the Clintons if "they" become the nominee. I will go vote for any republican candidate. That is what I will do.

However, Obama will be the nominee and we will see a big CHANGE in our country. We will have a fresh start and get our dignity back in the face the world.

______________________________________________
Jack ny, ny January 21, 2008 7:42 pm ET

As long as you are awake, it is good enough. Don't worry about others.
So annoying.
______________________________________________
DEWITT January 21, 2008 7:22 pm ET

1988: Bush

1992: Clinton

1996: Clinton

2000: Bush

2004: Bush

2008: Another CLINTON?

Is that what you people want? PLEASE WAKE UP!!!!!!!

murree   January 21st, 2008 10:27 pm ET

The more I hear Sen. Clinton, the more her voice is like nails on a blackboard. I'm willing to live with that. What I'm unwilling to live with is her duplicity and arrogance. Although a lifelong liberal, I'll not be voting for her regardless of who her opponent might be. To my way of thinking, she's an ideologue in the same mold as President Bush, albeit on another part of the political spectrum. We don't need another ideologue but a mature adult with a willingness to adjust to circumstance. While undecided on the other major democrat party candidates, I'll not vote for an true believer.

oldwhiteman   January 21st, 2008 10:26 pm ET

Okay America ,let me be the one to give you the scope on the healthcare bill.If you are so concerned.I live in Massachettes ,We have universal healthcare which is mandated.Majority of the citizens here be it white or black can't afford it .So guess what we get penalized at the end of the year through taxes if you do not have health ins.Truth be told it all sounds good when you say universal healthcare but at the end not everyone can afford it.I am a white indie but I would like to see Obama win the elections then I at least I can leave this earth knowing we are moving forward Instead of stuck at one place.The man is half white.My grandkids are half and I would like to leave this earth knowing someone like Obama can bring us all together .The Clintons have been in public for too long ,We will never know who they are working with or what their tru intentions are for running so vigorously .Lets get a fresh face n a new outlook on our government and maybe this will truly be a change.

SAM   January 21st, 2008 10:25 pm ET

Obama is the clear willer in tonights debate.

The Clinton campaign is built to divide and detour and conquer, with personal attack, innuendos and untruths, rather than debating the issues and differences and advantages that may exist. What really bothers me is that the Clintons don't seem to care that their tactics are divisive and detrimental to race relations, well so much for the Clinton’s love of America, race relations and unity, they have proven themselves to be dividers, and the debris of this lands this month during the celebration of Martin Luther Kings Birthday celebration and amidst the pictures on TV of white supremacist walking around in Jena Louisiana with lynches in their hands, yes this day over 40 years from the Civil Right movement, January 21, 2008.

Hillary has voted wrong on the war and several different bills, Bill Clinton brought us NAFTA, which has caused Americans millions of jobs and is threatening to destroy the middle class. Obama is ready, he has the foresight and knows how to make the right choices for America, Obama is a uniter and can successfully negotiate across aisles, boarders and oceans of the world, Obama is the one.

Rhonda   January 21st, 2008 10:25 pm ET

Obama was right on target. Obama is not running against Bill. The press is giving Bill so much attention, when they do that they need to preference every thing he says with a fact check monitor, just to keep them honest. I personally have been turned off with Bill and trully believe that Bill is expecting to one the White house, not Hillary. It's ashame that we can elect another president for another by coming in thrugh the back door, and putting his wife out there as the candidate, when it is clear that Bill is the candidate.

Judith   January 21st, 2008 10:24 pm ET

I am sickened by the back-and-forth between Clinton and Obama–I fear that they each will alienate the other's supporters so badly that Democrats will be unable to pull back together once the presidential candidate has been chosen. Winning the election will depend upon having all the voters turn out. I want to hear policies and programs, not about who might have said what, when. The debate made me lean toward Edwards. whereas I had been deciding between Clinton and Obama until now.

Hillary   January 21st, 2008 10:24 pm ET

I am so glad she showed her true colors tonight for all to see.

Yuck.

lee   January 21st, 2008 10:22 pm ET

I am a life-long, dedicated Democrat who was a huge fan and supporter of President Clinton, but I am disgusted, angry and ashamed of his behavior in this race. As a citizen he has every right to campaign for his spouse, but as a former president he should be held to a higher standard. He should tell us why we want to vote for Hilary, not why we shouldn’t vote for the other two excellent candidates. He needs to be positive, not negative. He has turned this into a nasty, negative campaign that would make Karl Rove proud. I always felt that our party was above that but I was wrong. He is turning this into a referendum on him, and taking attention away from the crucial issues that we face today. If she is the eventual nominee, you can bet the Republicans will use him and his behavior in the campaign this fall to motivate their base.

Brandon   January 21st, 2008 10:21 pm ET

Obama is shameless. His thin record is studied and it is not holding up. Instead of defending himself and his unaccomplished experience he is crying "FAUL" becuase Bill Clinton is making it an issue. Go spend a term or two in the Senate, get some work under your belt and come back in a future election. Are Bill Clinton and Oprah equals?

matt   January 21st, 2008 10:17 pm ET

don't you dare make this the only thing that sticks from this WHOLE debate - my GOD PLEASE CNN

Enrique   January 21st, 2008 10:17 pm ET

Someone tell Bill Clinton that the Constitution does not allow him to run for a third term. Hillary doesn't seem to understand.

Dusacre   January 21st, 2008 10:07 pm ET

New Yorker, NYC

A well-educated person has more than a list of Degree. I know PhDs that are less educated than HS graduates...

Ruby   January 21st, 2008 9:49 pm ET

Senator Obama is not just a man, but a strong gentle man. He tried in every way not to go on the attack. But even the best of us can only take so much. Plus, I believe that Senator Obama should defend his record. And, if he were not the frontrunner, he would not be attacked. I find it interesting that Senator Clinton was so emotional and passionate when talking about her love for the country, but just last week when she was confronted about her family situation, her voice did not crack one time. I have long respected President Bill and Senator Hillary Clinton, but up to now, they have shown their true colors, and their colors certainly are not red, white and blue.

VA Independent   January 21st, 2008 9:31 pm ET

Seems to me that in a battle of ethics, the Clintons don't have a leg to stand on.

Hillary for Prez   January 21st, 2008 9:12 pm ET

Why do people keep commenting on Bill's affair? What does that have to do with Hillary's run for the presidency?

You don't like the Clintons because Bill lied to the public about having an affair, is that it? The only difference between Bill Clinton and the rest of the presidents in United States history is that he got caught. Stay the hell out of their bedroom and marital issues. It's none of your business.

You want to cast those stones? Go ahead and tell me why Obama has lied so much to you, his devoted "followers" about his past? Why can't the man give a straight answer about anything? Why has it been proven that Obama's "autobiography" is no more than a great work of FICTION? Why does he want to keep his life a secret from YOU, his brainwashed followers?

Demand to know who Obama is and what he stands for. Reject his speeches....as this helps, little by little, recover from the spell his brainwashing speech writers have cast on you.

Gimma Break   January 21st, 2008 9:05 pm ET

Kathy, no. That's finite for me.

Das   January 21st, 2008 9:03 pm ET

I agree with the comment re Michelle Obama. She has been out there running her mouth...only she isn't as articulate as Bill. The press hasn't said a thing about her comment "if you can't run your own house, how can you run the White House?" If Bill had said anything like that (which is a very low blow coming from a woman...is she so sure Obama is true blue) the press would make it headline news across the country...for 2 weeks or at least until Obama could win a few more states.

kathy IL   January 21st, 2008 8:57 pm ET

to 1971 guy I do not like someone telling others how to vote. I will vote and if it counts (Ihope). It will be for the right man or woman but not Hillary. The Clintons have not been playing fair.

kathy IL   January 21st, 2008 8:51 pm ET

I repeat "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" Need we say more!

Gimma Break   January 21st, 2008 8:51 pm ET

Watching the debate...Go Barack! Toughness with finesse.

kevin   January 21st, 2008 8:38 pm ET

obama will use the race factor to his advantage. just wait and watch. sad thing is obama doesn't have slave roots and do not fight for african americans. i really hope my brothers and sisters will not be blinded by the color factor; that obama is black and he is right.

Amanda Johnson   January 21st, 2008 8:19 pm ET

The man can't even say the Pledge of Allegience, let alone put his religon before the Presidency how does he expect to run a country he doesn't put first in his life? How can we count on a man that wont be putting us first. The president has to be able to be President and put things such as religon and family in 2nd that's just how it is, there's a reason for seperation of church and State.

New Yorker, NYC   January 21st, 2008 8:13 pm ET

Look at Pinnocho Obama Nose Grow.

Gimma Break   January 21st, 2008 8:07 pm ET

Has anyone noticed that Hillary has packed on a couple of pounds? When was her last medical exam?

Mike T   January 21st, 2008 8:04 pm ET

If Hillary's last name wasn't Clinton and she hadn't been married to Bill Clinton, nobody would even know who she was and nobody would care one iota what she says or thinks.

And if her husband hadn't come out and campaigned for her: first, she wouldn't be a Senator, and second, she wouldn't have won a single state in this primary. I really think that most of the people voting for her think they are voting for Bill Clinton, and do not understand that he can't be president again. They need to read the Constitution.

Clinton also gets help from the media, including CNN. Ever notice that every time there is a story about the 3 candidates, like the one on the CNN homepage right now – Hillary's picture is first, Obama's is second, and Edward's is third. Is that supposed to be subliminal, or what? Further, they always seem to choose a flattering picture of Clinton, and the worst pictures they can find of the other two. Is that not bias as well?

Dr. Ellen S. Ringer   January 21st, 2008 8:04 pm ET

This is not to be taken lightly. I have never seen dirty poltics like Bill and Hillary Clinton's tactics.

1971guy   January 21st, 2008 8:03 pm ET

ONLY CLINTON -08 or stay home in Nov dems

New Yorker, NYC   January 21st, 2008 8:00 pm ET

enomisa
I complete agree with you. I have Dual BS in EE/CE and MS in EE/CE I support Hillary Clinton with out doubt. And My that also my Well Educated Friends support Hillary Clinton.
i know for a fact the African American Community in the NYS Support Sen. Hillary Clinton.

iF Barrack Hussein Obama is such a Uniter Why did he call Senator Hillary Clinton the senator from Punjabi. I think that is a racist comment. I my self african american was pissed because he make that comment against my Indian Wife. I think Mr. Hussein Obama need some education about world. Not be a George W. Bush.
When he was running against the Republicans in Il . He was against Keyes. Any one against Mr. Keye would've won.

Gimma Break   January 21st, 2008 7:54 pm ET

Don't you love the Pundits comments that Obama has to appeal to more than blacks. How easily they forget, Obama won in Iowa. Some of these guys are truly talking out of the side their heads.

NextPresident   January 21st, 2008 7:53 pm ET

Bill Clinton was impeached and if any of you read the Article I of the constitution you would have read this:

"Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law."

But Hillary says BIll will be an Ambassador, in which he cannot. He cannot even enjoy the office of honor, nor is he to paid as an ex president for speeches. When will people read.

Don   January 21st, 2008 7:52 pm ET

Guys, do not let the media sway your opinion. Look up the issues.Study and Vote your true beliefs. The media spins and is causing so much chaos. I am from SC. This is not a racially divided state. We do not worship the Confedrate Flag. However, you would not know that from watching the news.
Today is a good example of how media spins. I was at the MLK Day at the Dome celebration. Edwards, Obama and Clinton all spoke. Clinton had a huge African American support group there, hundreds of signs and supporters. However, CNN reported and showed the footage of all three speaking. MSNBC ran the exact same footage. On CNN, we did not see the Hillary supporters, and when they showed her speak there was not sound of the cheering crowd. However, Obama and Edwards audio was left on. MSNBC showed the same footage and Clinton had as much cheering if not more. I was there, so I know our community is supporting Hillary. Was this a technical issue, or is the media trying to make it appear that Clinton has little support from the African American community. Hope my post makes it on. After the event, hundreds of people poured into the Clinton headquaters. Not reported. It was also reported that Obama was the only one to march in the march. That is true, but the news failed to report that Clinton was supposed to march, but her flight was delayed. Not her fault. However, the unbalanced reporting made it look like Obama cared more and had more supporters. From a real I-report. It was even. Only Edwards had little support here. This is the media telling part of the story and we all need to be careful of what we believe and see on TV.

Independent Voter   January 21st, 2008 7:51 pm ET

The 'Clinton' brand is like a Chinese made product.

Jack ny, ny   January 21st, 2008 7:48 pm ET

this is suppose to be someone's fault. What is going to be next?

_______________________________________________________
Ron, Bronx, NY January 21, 2008 6:20 pm ET

Anybody with a properly funtioning brain knows that Michelle Obama is no Bill Clinton. Clinton is an ex-president with an armada of political connections and to even suggest that Michelle's support for her husband comes even close to the type of influence Bill Clinton's support has for his wife is misguided.

Mike T   January 21st, 2008 7:47 pm ET

He's also running against the media, including CNN – who clearly favors Clinton. Has anybody else noticed that every time there is a story about the 3 candidates, like the one on the CNN homepage right now – Hillary's picture is first, Obama's second, and Edward's third. Further,they always seem to choose a flattering picture of Clinton, and the worst pictures they can find of the other two. Is that not clearly bias?

marji   January 21st, 2008 7:47 pm ET

I am really furious at Bill Clinton's nasty attacks on Obama and I hope it backfires on the Clintons big-time. The good cop, bad cop strategy of the Clintons is transparent and revelatory of how they are not good enough for what is needed in this country and in the world because what is needed is statespersonship, not politics as usual.

Obama conveys a sense of integrity in thought and speech that seems as unique as it is genuine. I'm nearly over my love affair with Bill which, like many things Sixties-ish, has felt so good for so long. It's all beginning to seem as adolescent as it actually is at this post-9/11, post-modernist, deconstructed moment that will not be over for a long, long time....We need something much better than Bush, Bill or Hillary.

In addition, I resent what seems to be Hillary and Bill's sense of entitlement regarding the presidency. Just because they want it so badly doesn't mean they deserve it, as they seem to think.

Jack ny, ny   January 21st, 2008 7:42 pm ET

As long as you are awake, it is good enough. Don't worry about others.
So annoying.
______________________________________________
DEWITT January 21, 2008 7:22 pm ET

1988: Bush

1992: Clinton

1996: Clinton

2000: Bush

2004: Bush

2008: Another CLINTON?

Is that what you people want? PLEASE WAKE UP!!!!!!!

prince   January 21st, 2008 7:42 pm ET

Bill and Hillary had their turn for eight years in the white house. The country was divided and highly polarized. Bill left Osama Bin Laden loose when he could have gotten him, he left almost a million African slaughtered between the Tutsi and Hutsi when he could have helped but because therer were black and worth less, he looked the other way. He went and committed US war machine to drive away Milosovich in the middle of Europe. He keep deceiving the old demogues in the Black community and unfortunately been called the first Black president. Young and educated white, Latinos and black who wants a new direction are supporting Barack. The Clintons are now waging all sorts of distortion againt the Illinois Senator. Barack is a rising start and many young Americans are looking for a unifying figure just like JFK to lead us. The Clintons are in the black churches for their vote period. I will vote for Barack if he wins the nomination. If the mudslinging continue, I will pitch my tent with Jonh Mccain. These are great Americans with decency not filandre and impeached devisive clowns.

Jessica   January 21st, 2008 7:39 pm ET

Samuel,

I support Hillary Clinton, and I would like to answer your questions.

1. The premise of your first question is incorrect. Hillary Clinton has earned the support of 174 super delegates. Barack Obama has only earned the support of 84. Super delegates are senators, governors and other prominent political leaders in the Democratic Party. Barack Obama may have won several super delegates, but he did not win more than Hillary. In fact, she's bested him two-fold. If the second part of your statement is true, that senators from southern states support Barack Obama, then I think the Democratic Party needs to consider what that means. We are electing a nominee for the Democratic Party. The Republicans will elect their own nominee. We don't need a Conservative Republican vs. "Independent" or "Moderate" option in 2008. We need Republican vs. Democrat (and hopefully vs. Independent). Let's choose a Democrat to represent our party.

2. I am 25. I graduated from law school in May. I consider myself "young" and "intelligent." And, from my viewpoint, I think the college students are supporting Barack Obama b/c they like his rhetoric. He is inspirational, and they want to be inspired. (And, honestly, the smartest people I know do not support Barack Obama...they support Hillary, Joe Biden, Bill Richardson, or John Edwards. College is all about doing what it takes to fit in. Right now, supporting Obama is what it takes to fit in). However, they do not realize that Hillary can be equally inspiring. She may not be able to captivate an audience in the same way that Obama can, but she can still captivate an audience. And, I believe Hillary is the strongest, most-accomplished, intelligent woman in the Democratic Party. She has overcome so much to achieve such great things for women, children, minorities, and the American people during her life. I support Hillary because she has accomplished and will accomplish great things for America. Whenever you find yourself threatened by Hillary, please, at least, remember that. And, when you wonder what those great things are (because I realize most of the people on this blog are going to jump at that comment), please take the time to look up her life story. Don't just jump to the conclusion that she hasn't done anything. If nothing else, she deserves our respect for her life's work thus far.

And, on a side note, I find it offensive that you assume that Americans who did not go to college are "unintelligent." Every person has the right to vote, and no one person's vote is more important or less informed than another's simply because s/he did not go to college. My family lives in Iowa. None of them when to college. Yet, they spent hours pouring through all the information they could find before deciding to caucus for Hillary Clinton.

Mati   January 21st, 2008 7:34 pm ET

Texas January 21, 2008 6:56 pm ET
Obama, you are going to have to be extra strong, for you are up against the evil in this fight."

How is it possible for someone to use such words? The evil? If I only looked at how Obama supporters speak and write, I would just go far away from them and their idol. I wouldn't consider being associated with such a crowd. Sir/Madame, you don't do any service to your candudate.

jest   January 21st, 2008 7:32 pm ET

President Hillary Clinton and Vice President Bill Clinton.
Please Bill, step down and let Billary do her own campaing work. I respect you alot, you campained with no president behind you and you still won because you were the best for the job. Let Billary make it on her own. It will happen if its meant to be. If not We will all support B. Obama for change.

acumeati h.   January 21st, 2008 7:28 pm ET

...Crazy. Never ceased to imagine that Hils ultimate revenge would be a deep-throat from a young lad at the oval office! This might be the whole purpose of the Hil '08 campaign. Check your brains Bill. You've hurt your wife, your family, decieved your congress and your country. Hil '08 is nemesis in disguise!!

Chris, Orlando FL   January 21st, 2008 7:26 pm ET

Hey Barack,

If you can't stand the heat, don't run for president.

DEWITT   January 21st, 2008 7:22 pm ET

1988: Bush

1992: Clinton

1996: Clinton

2000: Bush

2004: Bush

2008: Another CLINTON?

Is that what you people want? PLEASE WAKE UP!!!!!!!

Ryk   January 21st, 2008 7:21 pm ET

I don't like stepping in on the side of Hillary. I oppose her as president and if she is on the ticket I could comfortably write in Charles Manson and be confident I was picking the better candidate. On this issue however I have to side with her or at least against Obama. The Clintons are running a political campaign. Whatever tactics they use are calculated to get votes. Obamas campaign is doing the same. Crying that they are not being fair is an admission that he can't handle running for president. The Bush campaign used far dirtier and cruel attacks against John Kerry. Would crying about it have got him more votes? If Barack Obama can't handle this minor sniping in the primaries he will be destroyed by the Republican spin machine. Also if he can't handle the campaign, how could he handle the job of president. I am not an Obama supporter but I would cheerfully vote for him over Hillary and over most of the Republican hopefuls but I am not going to get the chance to vote for him if he doesn't man up and fight Hillary on her own terms.

charlotte   January 21st, 2008 7:18 pm ET

One other thing, we don't know if Barack would have even won a second term in the Senate.

enomisa   January 21st, 2008 7:12 pm ET

This is for Samuel
I and everyone I know who support Hillary Clinton ARE college educated and quite articulate, intellectual , well read and well versed.
Sorry Buddy, you bought the media myth.
Senators from RED states are Republican and support Obama because they think he will cave in under their pressure. They KNOW that Hillary won't. They know that she will DO what she promises, and that scares them.
Those are the answers in a nutshell.

adipersada   January 21st, 2008 7:10 pm ET

Bill didn't act respectively.
No wonder if he is on Hillary's back.

This careless action only will make more support for the Obama's side..

Bravo Obama!
The change of the world will be on your hand one day!

Feed up in IL   January 21st, 2008 7:10 pm ET

OK, finally had it with the blue dress and the I didn't have sex. It's been ten years, can you guys get over it, his wife has. We need a D win not someone who will not fight without calling a foul. Remember 2000 and 2004? The Republicans will bring up all of Obama's dealings here with Tony, Rod, Jesses, Jr. (the south surburb airport), Alex (the mob treasure, Todd (the son that inheritated his fathers office) and so on and so on. He can talk the talk, but not walk the walk. And, one of the first things I would bring up is Big O's boyfriend, Studman and his partnership with Armstrong Williams, how did he benefit from the Department of Education dollars for no child left behind. The media is afraid to vet him, but the Republicans won't be. He needs to clean up his stuff and come back in 8 years. And really be Mr. Clean.

TYSPOCK , COLUMBIA, MD   January 21st, 2008 7:02 pm ET

The last I checked Obama's spouse was campaigning for him as well! Does he expect his spouse to make her best effort to support him, than he should not expect any less of other spouses, beside this is a cakewalk compared to what he can expect from the Slash and Burn republicans! As one prominent republican in congress said, “they eat their young” so Obama would be their desert !

Elliot Hammdon   January 21st, 2008 7:01 pm ET

The Clinton's are setting this country, and the DEM party back a few decades. Didn't they get the memo? We don't want politics as usual. We don't won't dirty politicians whose backgrounds and visions are so weak that they need to use dirty politics and constant attacks to win. We don't want you anymore Clinton. Go retire, you've had your day.

I'll never vote for Hillary! She is bad for the country! We need a new party, because Hillary and her supporters represent that worst aspects of the Democratic party. Let's start a new party based on sound policies and unity amongst all types of Americans!!!

BUSH?CLINTON?BUSH?CLINTON? And you people wonder why things don't change?

shari   January 21st, 2008 7:00 pm ET

Obama is whining about the Clintons?? Give me a break – what would he do when he came up against Bin Laden or other people who may talk about him...cry to the media who will reassure him he is next to God and bash whoever may not like him. Obama needs to grow up – this is the real world he cannot live behind his color anymore...it's deeper than that. Is this the type of leader we want/need?

Watch him carefully over the next few weeks..his true personality is starting to show. And what's up with his wife – she's never around...makes one wonder. At least all the other candidates have a spouse who shows they support them.

PS Bill may be over zealous protecting his wife as goodhusbands do.

Cory Fisher   January 21st, 2008 6:58 pm ET

You people are saying that Obama is whining?

Im a Libertarian who likes Ron Paul, but Obama is my second choice. Hillary is a fake who will say anything to get into the White House. You people are saying that Obama is "whining", was it not Hillary who became "emotional?" How does being the first lady qualify as experience?

Shes blowing smoke, and she only have her name to stand on.

Paul 08
Obama 08

Texas   January 21st, 2008 6:56 pm ET

Obama, you are going to have to be extra strong, for you are up against the evil in this fight.
Remember there are so many of us watching you and praying that you can make it.
The Clinton's think they own everything and everybody, but there are many of us that feel if a person will lie to you he will do anything to win whatever. Clinton has lied to the Americans and shook his finger as he did. He must think we are a stupid group of people that can't see thru him. He is looking very sick so far his health goes he should give it up.
Let those Clinton's talk all they want to, I don't think in the end it will hurt you
I am McCain age and I retired to give the younger people a chance. I believe in our younger ones taking over. That's what we train them for. When you get to your 70's and apply for a job for 8 years, I hope he talks about getting older. His wife looks young, but he shows his age. He may be strong right now, but when you get into your 70's you health begans to take a toll. Even two years under the stress of being President is hard to understand how he will make it. He says he loves his country, but if he really does, then he would realize his age and do the best for the Americans and let the younger take over..

David, SC   January 21st, 2008 6:55 pm ET

The Clinton's are scumbags, and I don't care what they do and even if Hillary does win. A scumbag family like that will never get my vote. I'll vote for Mccain instead, or I'll vote for Obama if he runs as an independent.

Shrimp Barnicles, Africa   January 21st, 2008 6:54 pm ET

Obama is fighting not only an uphill battle but also fighting with bags of sea sand tied around his legs and sand.

From the perspective of a soccer player, he enters every state already down by 3 before the refree blows the commencement whistle. Think about having to play a soccer match with an an opponent and your opponent is always awarded 3 goals even before the game begins.

Pre awarded goal #1: Hillary's husband was once an 8 yr term president. She receives free popularity.
'" "" #2: Bill Clinton had already built an infrastructure for her to run with. Obama has to start from the scratch.

Pre awarded goal #3: Can an african american win the presidency?

SB   January 21st, 2008 6:48 pm ET

Gotta love the blind Hilary supporters who think he's whining. Did you scream whining when HRC was on meet the press stating 50 billion times that Obama's camp was the one trying to twist things? How about when she cried on TV when she felt the nod was slipping from her? Maybe my Webster doesn't have the complete definition of whining?

Leah DiMarco, TX   January 21st, 2008 6:48 pm ET

Aeolus-

I don't work for any campaign.

But to answer your question.... probably just as many posters that work for the Clinton campaign!

Obama '08

Robby   January 21st, 2008 6:46 pm ET

If Hillary is gonna be President, she's got to show she can stand up for herself. I have no doubt she can, but I'd like to see her do it without Bill.

Aeolus   January 21st, 2008 6:38 pm ET

I'm just wondering....how many of you work for Barack's campaign? ;)

eric downing   January 21st, 2008 6:36 pm ET

Right on NYC Democrat. I am completely turned off by the Clinton campaign's dirty tactics over the last week. The way that they are take half-quotes from Obama and chiding him on his opposition to the war is just dishonest and reminds me of what I hate about politics. How can they bash Obama on his war votes when she's voted exactly the same way on every bill??? They want to say that it's not in line with his vocal opposition to the war...Well at least he didn't vote for it. At least he's had the guts to be consistently against it from the beginning. Just because he's not be willing to throw our troops under the bus for it he shoudn't be derigated. The Clinton's have really lowered the bar in the last week. I just hope the American people don't reward them for it as well.

dan, tx   January 21st, 2008 6:35 pm ET

Bill Clinton did to the democratic party what a certain intern did to Bill.

The reason Bush got elected was because most of America was/is disgusted by Bill Clinton. I know the dems love him, but most of the rest of us don't.

I don't like Bush at all, but I'll gladly see another republican administration before another Clinton.

My vote #1 Obama, #2 McCain. Let's choose a leader who will bring people together.
Unity '08

Mike   January 21st, 2008 6:34 pm ET

Just because Obama is calling out the Clintons for their lies and deception doesn't mean he's whining. It means he is taking a stand, which is exactly what he says he plans to do. That is not whining, and it is not weakness, it is a kind of honest leadership. When the political process gets ridiculous, he is able to make a joke. When Bill partially quotes what he says, he calls him on it. When Bill is the reason that Hillary is in the campaign, and he is channeling the negative comments that the Clinton campaign want to keep apart from Hillary, he points it out.

I think that is strong leadership, not a glass jaw or a whimper.

If Russia continues to move away from Democracy or violates human rights in Chechnya. If China continues to violate trade agreements by disregarding safety standards, don't we want a president who will call them on it?

Why would you call that weakness? I would call that strength and integrity.

In the end, Hillary and the whole Clinton machine owe too many favors and are in the political machine too much to really make an unpopular stand or an unconventional stand, which is what we need in a leader.

We don't need the Clintons to try and pass the same Health Care legislation they failed to pass 12 years ago. We need a leader who can change the view of the US internationally. Experience is important, but leadership qualities don't come from 25 years of favors and back-door politics.

A true leader can quickly rise to the top, which is why Obama is doing so well. He is fresh and inspirational. I wish some of the Clinton supporters who are blindly following her or claiming that her experience will make a difference could take a little more of a chance on a candidate that we can actually believe and believe in.

hlking   January 21st, 2008 6:34 pm ET

For once I would like to see the people of this country look at all the candidates, listen and study their positions on all the issues, and then vote in their own best interest. It makes absolutely no sense to me to see a white man driving an old rusty pickup truck, asking for chicken backs in the grocery store, living in a trailer park and goes out and gets in his pitiful truck that has a REPUBLICAN STICKER AND A VOTE FOR GEORGE BUSH AND SUPPORT OUR TROOPS. It would be sad if there were only one man of this description, but there are thousands.

Tim   January 21st, 2008 6:33 pm ET

Obama is trying to play the innocent victim by saying he is going up against Bill and Hillary Clinton. What was he doing when he brought out Ohprah and when he made all the false statements about Hillary and Bill Clinton. Obama is a dishonest person and a liar. People are beginnng to see through all his hope and change hype. Its all an illusion and smoke screens. Obama plays the race card one minute than plays the saint the next. Obama is a joke with that fake MLK Jr. sound that he tries to make during his speeches. Can we trust a guy like this as president of the United States?

james   January 21st, 2008 6:30 pm ET

type in Hillary no wire hangers in you tube and you will see the real Hillary

Victoria   January 21st, 2008 6:30 pm ET

Please Obama hands are just as dirty.. He got caught red handed at the debate for this camping pushing the race card story. He got what he wanted out of the story. Than trys to pretend he had nothing to do with and calls for a truce to act like he is the good guy. Now He lies when He said he would not run ad's in Florida well guess what he has them up and running. Now if Hillary runs ads the media will say she broke the rules first. In C.A. his camp is sending out flyers telling Republican to change parties for the day and vote for him. Do we really want the Republican picking our candidate? Shady. He is no saint

jim   January 21st, 2008 6:29 pm ET

Got to love cnn's onesided views .They mite get that we the people are not dumb. WE CAN CHOSE FOR OURSELFS!!!!!!

oldclintonfan   January 21st, 2008 6:29 pm ET

Hey Bill, you're not running for office anymore. Keep your mouth shut and let your wife fight her own fight. Unless you just want to suck the support out of your old supporters.

Let's let Americans think for themselves, okay?They, not you, are the ones to decide which candidate is the best. In this case, I no longer feel that your wife is because I don't think she can hold her own. You'll be a great first man, if there's any chance of her being elected, picking up the garage she leaves behind.

Nancy   January 21st, 2008 6:25 pm ET

Oh, waaaah, Barrack.

Further evidence that Obama doesn't have the brains or strategic foresight to run the country.

It didn't occur to him beforehand that the Clintons would tag team him? Apparently he's not spent a minute studying his rival(s). When one Clinton runs for office, the other one is right there behind him/her. It's a partnership.

If you can't take the heat in the campaign trail kitchen, how the heck are you going to handle foreign affairs?

Calvin   January 21st, 2008 6:21 pm ET

Everytime Bill Clinton starts to point his finger, all I can think of is "I DID NOT HAVE SEXUAL RELATIONS WITH THAT WOMAN".

I appeal to Barack Obama to speak in more detail about his achievements as a Civil Rights Attorney.
Most poor and blacks will not seek out this information on their own. CNN and The Evening News are often their only source of information. Give them what they NEED to hear.

God Bless,
C.

Ron, Bronx, NY   January 21st, 2008 6:20 pm ET

Anybody with a properly funtioning brain knows that Michelle Obama is no Bill Clinton. Clinton is an ex-president with an armada of political connections and to even suggest that Michelle's support for her husband comes even close to the type of influence Bill Clinton's support has for his wife is misguided.

charlotte   January 21st, 2008 6:11 pm ET

Wallace,, weren't you most likely a major beneficary of affirmative action, thanks to Bill Clinton?
Jimmy, if you want Bush back you are one sick puppy
If Obama can't stand the attacks now, how can he hope to survive the onslaught that is in store if he should get the nomination!
Face it now, politics is a nasty business. It is not for the faint of heart. It takes a lot of intestinal fortitude to survive.
Look at what the republicans are throwing at McCain. Now that is nasty, really nasty.

Mary   January 21st, 2008 6:09 pm ET

Just because he is speaking on behalf of his wife I don't consider that down and dirty. I think what people fell to realize that she's his wife first and he should support her. SO PEOPLE PLEASE GET OVER IT!!!!!!!!!!! OBAMA just need to man up and get his issues across, lets move on now.

Gavin   January 21st, 2008 6:04 pm ET

PLEASE BARRY! QUIT CRYING LIKE A BABY...

Is Hillary running again Michelle Obama too since she continues to run her big mouth with irresponsible comments like, "AIN'T NO WHITE PEOPLE IN IOWA"

Barack is running along Racial Lines and it's shameful

Sheila   January 21st, 2008 6:03 pm ET

Now we are seeing the real Bill Clinton – down and dirty, win at all costs. He has no sense of fair play. Barack has stayed above it all until he was forced to respond to lies coming from Bill Clinton. Hillary thinks it protects her image but she is way wrong.

Jack ny, ny   January 21st, 2008 6:00 pm ET

you need fresh blood in WH??? Are you out of your mind??? AMerica is in worst shape in last 7 years. Recession is here and your want to experiment. Yes 7 years ago it was good time to experiment. Today it is time to play safe. If economy was booming then yes my thinking would be to take more risk.
________________________________________________________
Allen barcomb January 21, 2008 4:26 pm ET

I think we need new blood in the goverment with new ideas. Clinton to me is only going backward for this country. And we know we don't need another Bill Clinton in the White House. And People should know that Hillery will take advice from her Husband and not from her own thoughts of doing things. But I know if it is between Hillery and Mckain, I will go with the Replubican for President

MT   January 21st, 2008 6:00 pm ET

Anyone who thinks that Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are "not that different" have already drunk the Billary kool-aid. The difference is day and night: between having integrity and honesty (most of all with yourself) and being willing to say and do ANYTHING to regain power. Wanting to become president and feeling that it's your turn are not qualifications for the highest office of the land.

Yes, this life-long Democrat will also vote Republican if it's Hillary vs. McCain in November. BUT it won't be if we work hard and show the country what REAL LEADERSHIP is!

Barack to the future... Obama all the way!!!!!

Dee H   January 21st, 2008 5:58 pm ET

Obama is a sniveler who can't stand a fight. This shows me that he is a softy and a wimp. We can't afford to have a cry baby in the White House. What would he do as President if a dictator like Hugo Chavez made negative statements about him? Go to the UN and whine and complain about it? He says he's going to fight back at the Clintons, but Obama's complaining and whining is really his way of getting others to do the fighting for him. He's a big talking stuffed suit, and the stuffing is as soft as marsh mellows.

Jack ny, ny   January 21st, 2008 5:55 pm ET

MT- you need to see Michelle barking on utube. She was attacking hillary on personal level. SHe spitting venom like no tomorrow. Check her out the one in red dress.
Obama supporters are living in la la la land.

_________________________________________

MT January 21, 2008 5:06 pm ET

MB Nekog: it's one thing for a spouse to be there, supporting and speaking on behalf of the one running for office — as Michelle Obama has done. It's quite another to have your spouse be the bulldog, spitting venom against your opponent while you can keep your hands clean and maintain "plausible deniability"… classic Billary tactic.

Diane   January 21st, 2008 5:52 pm ET

Obama calls it like it is-"IT IS WHAT IT IS"
He "is" running against two Clintons.
People want Bill back in office so they are voting for Hillary. Pitiful.
I could not agree more with the good cop/bad cop analogy-they want Hillary to not look so harsh.
Her whimpering before the last election worked so they are
running with it.
Do you want her whimpering with our foreign leaders? Its not even
her whimpering now-Bill is doing it too.

Dusacre   January 21st, 2008 5:50 pm ET

George as an American, I can tell you that the Clintons are very clever:

The first thing the Clintons do to get a support is to go for their emotions

The second thing is to divide them, and give them a feeling of being special

The third thing is to take way any logical thought

These are the three steps to become a hard-core Clinton supporter.

It will not work this time!

Nik T   January 21st, 2008 5:48 pm ET

Obama's crying now and the Clintons are going easy on him, yet he can't take it. If he were to get the nomination he'd be torn apart by the Repubes. Repubes will use anything and everything to distort a candidate, they'll swiftboat him with no mercy and will destroy him in the first two months... His lack of backbone and whiny attitude make Obama look more like a novice and very unprepared to take on the Repubes.

Igs   January 21st, 2008 5:47 pm ET

Rough and tumble chicago politics? Please. I could see Obama's reaction when Iran detonates its first nuke. "Mr. Ahmednijead, you told us you had no weapons. I was hoping that was accurate. Now I will whine about it on ABC." Wuss, get out of training diapers before you come to school.

Al   January 21st, 2008 5:43 pm ET

The Clinton's have been, and will continue to be outclassed by Barack Obama! This fellow has so much brain power (even over Rhode Scholar Bill), so much attractability, so much persuasiveness that is gaining thousands, that the Clinton's can't do anything but fight dirty. Bill needs to totally step aside. Let Hillary win on her own merits, if she can.

What the American people are witnessing is truly historic. A black man taking on possibly the most powerful politicians on the planet, Bill and Hillary Clinton. Who would have ever thought that a woman, with a husband who's the ex-president of these United States, would be running for president. That's enough history in and of itself. Now you have the drama of a black man also running and he's blown onto the scene in just a few short weeks, or so it seems, to be toe-to-toe with those who never expected to have to fight as hard for what they want.

Barack Obama is a true leader, an inspiration to all Americans, black and white. The Clinton's have been totally outclassed!

Nancy   January 21st, 2008 5:36 pm ET

As a long time democrat, I have to say that I've lost a huge amount of respect for Bill Clinton lately due to things he is saying while campaigning for Hillary. Integrity is extremely important to me in a politician, and in my eyes, Bill Clinton's integrity has reached a new low.

marcia   January 21st, 2008 5:36 pm ET

Why is the media giving so much attention to Mr. Clinton? who cares what he says-is he running? is this what we will be putting up with if gosh forbid she does win? Hasn't the public had enough of him? Do we forget so quickly? Senator Obama don't get suckered in to the Clinton spin-focus on your election issues.

Tim   January 21st, 2008 5:35 pm ET

Obama does his dirt, but when the table is turned, he starts whinning about Bill and Hillary, but he will attack Bill and Hillary every chance he gets. Obama, don't put it out if you can't take it.

Joeley Reno, Nevada   January 21st, 2008 5:35 pm ET

Quit your whinning Barak!

You made the choice to do some cookin' so don't complain about the heat in the kitchen!

Clinton 08!

Ann   January 21st, 2008 5:33 pm ET

I am thoroughly disappointed in President Clinton. It is one thing for a former president of the United States to actively campaign for his wife for the highest office in the greatest land. It is quite another to observe him lying and manipulating statments to help his wife win. It's distasteful. It's very reminiscent of his presidential campaign and the Pres, Bush campaign against Vice-President Gore and Sen, Kerry. It looks like Carl Rove's playbook. It certainly doesn't look presidential. I guess he'll do and say anything to live in the white house again.

Reco Davis, Atlanta   January 21st, 2008 5:29 pm ET

C'mon Obama supporters. Let's all make up 10 different screen names and start posting about how Hillary Clinton is a whiner!

Absolutely ridiculous...

Obama '08

marcia   January 21st, 2008 5:18 pm ET

WHY

Don   January 21st, 2008 5:17 pm ET

once again, before I go brain dead from reading these post. The only people crying and whinning seem to be here. Clinton does talk issues and policy. You can here it in her rallies and find it on her web-site.Same for Obama and Edwrads. The people not talking issues are you. Where is the passion about healthcare and the economy. If you people put as much energy into solving our countries problems as you do writting tabloid post, we could have cured AIDS. This is what is wrong with America and half you just ignore it. I don't know any of you, but do you this much energy into your community. Why not talk about that instead of Hillary's marriage(ps.none of our business) and Obama's middle name( not his fault). I have read some very intelligent post here, but the majority reads like the National Enquier.
Finally, If your an Obama supporter, why in the world would you vote rebulican if Hillary gets the nomination. Obama will work his butt off to get her elected and vice-versa. They are on the same team. If you like Obama, you have to like Hillary, because when you get down to issues, they are almost identical. I think people here need to ask, those people making this claim are they real, or is thier outside forces trying to split a new and powerful democratic party. Don't fall for the tricks. Hillary or Obama will be great Presidents compared to what we have now and what we have to choose from.

dallas   January 21st, 2008 5:12 pm ET

Give me a break. Obama is not whining. He is pointing out what he has been saying all along. That is what is wrong with politics in this country. Politicians are more concerned with getting and keeping their jobs, than doing what is in the best interest of this country.

What Obama is saying, is that the divisive political games are what is wrong. You can not get things accomplished in Washington, by fighting and name calling. I think smart voters will realize this. I don't think the man's feeling are hurt.

While we are talking about boohooing. I don't think I have ever seen a presidential candidate crying on the campaign trail. Talk about weakness. Do you think leaders of Iran, Al-Queda, and others that mean to do us harm, will respect the authority of a woman that was CRYING ON TV, while running for office.

Let's be honest. Obama is the best chance to get on with things. I am not saying the guy is God's answer to a president. But, when you look at the choices we have, no intelligent person can not vote Obama.

CJ   January 21st, 2008 5:11 pm ET

I think Barack Obama is a good guy who has a lot of ability. He needs to stop responding to negative comments by saying the same thing about his opponent. I believe in him, but I hope he reads this and takes it seriously. If he didn't do voter intimidation (which I don't think he did), he should just say "I didn't do that", and get on with his life. I thought he said he wouldn't do negative campaigning. Of course Bill Clinton will say stuff like that. Just be positive and don't let it get to you. Be the better candidate. As for Hillary, try to control your husband; don't let him lie about people's votes and stuff like that. It turns people off. It doesn't matter to me what he would have done if he were in the Senate in 2003. You were, and you voted. Do you support your vote now? Tha's what I want to know.

No more Clinton Doublespeak   January 21st, 2008 5:10 pm ET

Don,
I am a for real lifetime Democrat and have never not voted the party line. I have been able to vote for almost 40 years. I certainly would not leave my beloved America if Hillary is the candidate but I will not ever vote for her. I have had it with all the career politicians and that is what the Hill & Bill are. I am not sure where my vote will go and am still not committed to anyone.
I sure won't leave the country if she is elected. I will stay and fight for a better candidate.

Lynn - Alhambra, CA   January 21st, 2008 5:10 pm ET

Hillary Clinton has said time and time again that she has the EXPERIENCE and her record proves it! HUH?

What we have heard, is this: She voted for the bill authorizing the Iraq War, but didn't mean it. She voted against the bill that inserted inspectors into Iraq but forced Bush to come back to Congress to get war authorization, but she always wanted to limit the president's authority. She voted for the Bankruptcy Bill but was pleased it did not pass. She touts her experience but has not indicated what it is she actually did that confirms that experience. She suggests she is the only one prepared to deal with a terror attack, but never indicates what her expertise is in that role. She says that executive experience, managing departments, is critical... but does not indicate that she has ever done it.

The Clintons' handlers are back in charge. Are we all just supposed to inhale?

Denise   January 21st, 2008 5:07 pm ET

Think About Change said it best. As an African American female married to a white male, I find it a little disconcerting that some blacks are resorting to denegrating themselves to promoting someone who is like them instead of someone who is one of them. I love my heritage and my husband. All the candidates are intelligent, but it's time for Americans to unite and put the bickering aside. I found it especially humorous that all the candidates are speaking unity on the celebration of MLK's birthday and tomorrow, the only candidate who has and will continue promoting unity is Obama.

David Democrat   January 21st, 2008 5:06 pm ET

I've always liked Bill and would consider Obama for president if Obama was not such a whiner. Its true that he does not act like he has the steel spine and maturity needed to weather the hard decisions that will face the next president.

MT   January 21st, 2008 5:06 pm ET

MB Nekog: it's one thing for a spouse to be there, supporting and speaking on behalf of the one running for office - as Michelle Obama has done. It's quite another to have your spouse be the bulldog, spitting venom against your opponent while you can keep your hands clean and maintain "plausible deniability"... classic Billary tactic.

Ray   January 21st, 2008 5:03 pm ET

1st- Hillary did not cry. She got emotional.

2nd- Any spouse would support the other

3rd- NObama is nothing but a wimp. If he cant take it now, he will never win.

HILLARY 08!

Wallace Brown   January 21st, 2008 4:59 pm ET

I am a Black male in my mid-fifties who has always voted for a Democrat for President but if Hillary Clinton wins the Democratic nomination I will vote for a Republican for the first time in my life. If a Republican did what the Clintons have been doing – character assassination, mud-slingling, lying, and disaparaging Barack Obama my people would call them racists and be 100% correct. Why is it that the holier than thou Clintons get away with a hi-tech lynching of Obama and there is silence in our community???? I do not worship at the altar of Bill Clinton and what he and his henchman working for Hillary are doing is despicable and it's high time Black leaders stop being silent about it.

joy   January 21st, 2008 4:58 pm ET

if hillary is claiming that her experience counts when they are in the white house, who was there during the genocide in rawanda

MB Nekog   January 21st, 2008 4:58 pm ET

Why is there always a double standard when it comes to Obama? Obama's wife has been an instrumental part of the Obama candidacy–she's been there since day one, speaking on his behalf, supporting and fighting for the causes he believes in. Hillary, like any other candidate, has EVERY right to utilize anyone within her family circle to promote her causes.

On a side note, I just saw a story on CNN about a recent poll asking Americans whether or not we are ready for a black president. Why hasn't CNN conducted a similar poll asking whether or not Americans are ready for the first female President? Quit the bias, CNN!

Charles in Salt Lake City, UT   January 21st, 2008 4:56 pm ET

Clinton (whichever, pick your gender) is a pandering jerk.

Neither one of the Clintons did a THING for the Black Community that the Black Community didn't already do better for themselves! The Black Community does not need "good white masters" (who expect to be praised and rewarded) to "do" for them anymore. That's what Obama's message of hope and pride is all about — not just for Blacks, but for everyone.

And for the record — the 1964 Civil Rights Act (yes, it was "signed by a President") wasn't what eventually overcame discriminatory attitudes about race in America and made racism unfashionable, it was the beautiful dream expressed by Martin Luther King and the sacrifices of countless Civil Rights advocates!

South Carolina, when you vote on Dr. King's birthday, kindly remember the dream he actually stood for.

Cameron   January 21st, 2008 4:56 pm ET

I do not see what is wrong with a spouse defending his or her partner. All three Michelle Obama, Elizabeth Edwards and Bill Clinton have been speaking on behalf of their spouses. Its just so happens that Bill Clinton is more famous than Michell Obama or Elizabeth Edwards is that why the complaining.

Barack Hussein Obama should stop complaining and take it like a man without trying to act like a victim here. This is why Barack Obama is not ready to be the president! He is already complaining.
He can send out the big reporters like Chris Mathews Russert, and Fineman via Rove to be a mouthpiece for him every time he gets challenged by his opponents.

What is he going to do when the Republicans come after him? They have not even started to attack him. Is he going to run for president under Affirmative Action?
How is he going to stand up and fight the Republicans when they use his full name Barack Hussein Obama connecting and exposing his church affiliation to Nation of Islam and Louise Farakhan.

This shows Barack Hussein Obama is not ready yet.

Lynn - Alhambra, CA   January 21st, 2008 4:55 pm ET

Come on people...make an informed decision and read ALL the candidates policies. Then take a look at all the issues we face as a nation and choose who can best bring about change in a world that so desperately needs it!

Obama 08

Tom, Michigan   January 21st, 2008 4:53 pm ET

Yes WE NEED a CLINTON – OBAMA Ticket to win the white house and CHANGE the WORLD. Join together for countrys good

Wayne   January 21st, 2008 4:53 pm ET

Call 1-800-WHINE

Ayyub, Richmond, Va   January 21st, 2008 4:53 pm ET

For Mr. Obama January 21, 2008 4:08 pm ET

Obama, please grow up and stop whining. You said you want to change the political scene in this country? Then when you started playing dirty, tricky and slimy politics, the reverse of what you are preaching, expect it to be thrown back to you. Most smart voters would not fall into your trap. You are demonstrating that you are just another politician who sets his own rules of dirty politics.
Hillary for president all the way.

You're sad, the person who typed this. You need to ask your candidate about this. Plus, I have a question for everyone. Who wants to go back to the '90? Who wants to move on through time?

Gobama   January 21st, 2008 4:50 pm ET

Senator Obama a whiner? lol

Obama is in an enviable position.

See, this is why Obama needs to be President, so that he can do something about the poverty of American education.
They are unable to see the strategy of the highly intelligent Harvard grad, Obama.

1. Bill Clinton for all his lack of dignity, shame and class, and his undermining of the Presidency, he is STILL a former President.

2. One has to be careful about taking down a former President, even one as low as Bill Clinton. Careful not for the 'man' himself, but care for the Office of the Presidency.

3. So, Obama has to first set up the self-destructive Bill Clinton to Americans who know him for what he really.
Then Obama can really take down .. . Later!.

4. Also, with Bill Clinton running for a THIRD CLINTON TERM, he's giving Obama a chance to challenge the Clinton as THIRD TERM SEEKERS!

5. With a 'man', Bill Clinton, running for a THIRD TERM (because his wife is not that competent) Obama can direct his fire power at Bill, a 'man'; because it would be UNWISE TO DUMP ON A WOMAN, even if she is the shameless self-obsorbed Hilary Clinton.

No need to allow Hilary 'sympathy votes'!

James Lucas Clemmons NC   January 21st, 2008 4:49 pm ET

Quit crying Obama. ... it's called politics. If you think you are being double teamed by the Clintons. ... God help us if you get the nomination because the Repulicans will take your lunch money and have you for lunch. Fight son ! America loves a good fight. Bill Clinton is suspose to do just what he is doing. It is the luxury She has being married to the former and still very popular President. Surely you did not think they would roll over just because you are a black man. This is politics 101. ... You did a great job getting the Republican vote out in Nevada, and yes the Culinary folk who supported you were trying to get the Hilary vote to stay home. ... but that's just plain ole politics. You don't have to like it, but you do have to figure out how to fight against it. In Nevada. ..She did and you did not. ... learn from it. ... quickly I might add, South Carolina is just around the corner. If she beats you there you are toast my friend. If you win, and she is a very close second. .. the fat lady may not be singing. ... but she is walking to the mike. Quit crying and fight !

Moodi   January 21st, 2008 4:48 pm ET

Dorothy

I completely agree with you.

Don   January 21st, 2008 4:46 pm ET

Greg in OH, Please. This is the backyard fence tactic. Lets start a rumor and see where it takes us. If the people on these boards spent a little more time going to see their canidates( all of them and yes I have) we would be a lot better off. Instead we have people on here spewing hate and buying into the media spin. I have been watching CNN for two hours and still do not know what this new divide between Obama and Clinton really is. By the way, I spent 8 hours in 14 degree weather to hear all three caindiates this morning without the media spin. How would you guys feel if people started spouting off about your personel life and your job performance. Stop wallowing in the past, in gossip, and in media spin and educate yourselves. I suspect that some of you are on here just to create trouble where none exist. Ever had a friend like that??? Some of us here know whats going on. People like this will tear this country apart, not Clinton and not Obama. Vote based on fact, based an record, and based on experiance. The change you all clamour for should start on this blog.

Dorothy, White Salmon, Wa   January 21st, 2008 4:46 pm ET

Manning January 21, 2008 4:28 pm ET

Who is the only candidate to ever cry during a campaign trail because she felt SEXISM was the reason people hated her? Oh, right that was the person who claims to have LOTS of experience: Mrs. Bill Clinton.

Obama is not whining but fighting back. At least he hasn't used the RACE card to defend himself
************************
Michelle Obama, doing the "dirty work" for her husband did in fact introduce race into the campaign. All you have to do is go back to the Iowa speeches.

Hillary Clinton didn't cry; she did get emotional when someone asked her how she was doing. She was tired. I certainly thought it was about the same way I would respond if I were tired. So, she's human after all.

Boomer 4 Obama   January 21st, 2008 4:41 pm ET

to NickNas: I think Bill wants to live in The White House again MORE than Hillary does!

When will all the feminists realize: 1) Bill is using Hillary AGAIN? 2) The Clintons marriage has become fodder for the tabloids and daytime talk shows.

WAKE UP, AMERICA!

Mo   January 21st, 2008 4:40 pm ET

i WOULD HOPE TO SEE AN oBAMA /eDWARDS TICKET

Aja   January 21st, 2008 4:40 pm ET

Why does the media keep asking if America is ready for a Black President?? Does the media actually think we as Americans are that backwards that this is a real issue? Everyone I've talked to (and I live in the South) says they are making their decisions based on the issues, not on skin color. This is 2008, not 1958 come on CNN get with the times!

Oh, and Ross, I really hope you are joking!

Dorothy, White Salmon, Wa   January 21st, 2008 4:37 pm ET

Obama has Michelle and Oprah at his side. Hillary has Bill at her side. Barak Obama is obviously a good person whose experience level isn't near that of Hillary's. When the primaries are over, I hope to see a Hillary Clinton-Barak Obama ticket. Then, the Clintons will be able to help him in the run against the Republican machine with their Swiftboat ads. His statesmanship will help him immensely as he meets world leaders, works with a bi-partisan congress to get changes made and in the end, becomes the President we will need in the future.

More than anything, we need both these candidates to be civil in their criticism of each other.

Terry   January 21st, 2008 4:33 pm ET

As a life long African American Democrat, I will not support Hillary Clinton if she wins the nomination. The primary reason is the way they have treated Obama and their appreant thought the Hillary is next in line for the job. I am so disappointed by the way the Former president is running his wife's attack on Obama.

Greg in OH   January 21st, 2008 4:30 pm ET

If Bill was continuing to have affairs, would that affect Hillary's voters/supporters? According to Huffington Post, the NY Times and LA Times have been sitting on a story about how Bill has been having affairs currently, but won't release until after the election. This is not me making it up, go out their and you can find this too.

So the question stands, does it affect voters if Bill is up to his old tricks?

Manning   January 21st, 2008 4:28 pm ET

Who is the only candidate to ever cry during a campaign trail because she felt SEXISM was the reason people hated her? Oh, right that was the person who claims to have LOTS of experience: Mrs. Bill Clinton.

Obama is not whining but fighting back. At least he hasn't used the RACE card to defend himself.

DP, Jacksonville, FL   January 21st, 2008 4:27 pm ET

Before the 2006 elections you never heard word one about immigration or border security. Yet within a four week period it suddenly became the most important topic on everyone's lips.

Despite what the media would have you believe, the vast majority of people don't equate experience with corruption or incompetence. It's a manufactured campaign point, no different than the immigration issue.

We're all looking for change, and Obama will make a great president some day, but not this year. He's a brilliant communicator who simply lacks experience. But if he doesn't commit himself to running a focused campaign it will damage his chances in 8 years.

Clintons to Cowards   January 21st, 2008 4:26 pm ET

Cowards get people to do there dirty work. Who is Hillary with out Bill? She has no experience. Please notice everyone that supports her talks about the 90's. NEWS FLASH-Hillary Clinton wasnt president in the 90's her husband was. I ask again who is Hillary without Bill. ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!!

Don   January 21st, 2008 4:26 pm ET

For all those people claiming they are life-long democrats and they will vote republican if hillary is the nominee, get a grip. 1- I doubt very seriously that you are a democrat. 2- I heard the same retoric when Buch was re-elected, but didnt see a max exodus to Canada.3- Hillary's personel life has nothing to do with her job as a public servant. I am sure their are many hypocrites on here who act as if they never cheated, never been cheated on( and oh my God, actually stayed with their spouse) and have never made and mistakes. Hillary has admitted that she has not always been right, maybe some of you posters could learn. For those who plan on leaving the country, do us a favor and go now.

Allen barcomb   January 21st, 2008 4:26 pm ET

I think we need new blood in the goverment with new ideas. Clinton to me is only going backward for this country. And we know we don't need another Bill Clinton in the White House. And People should know that Hillery will take advice from her Husband and not from her own thoughts of doing things. But I know if it is between Hillery and Mckain, I will go with the Replubican for President

Paul Davis, San Francisco   January 21st, 2008 4:25 pm ET

Obama is not whining. There is a high profile former president literally changing around what he has said on multiple occasions. This man was IN A CAUCUS in Nevada, and parading around the Casino's alleging voter fraud and discrimination tactics. Why not talk about the Clinton's closing doors early? Wht not talk about Obama winning all the other counties in Nevada (with very diverse populations)? Why not talk about the polorizing affect the Clintons do and will have on Federal politics?

Obama has a right to attack Bill. In fact he needs to. It's important to see how the clinton's campaign. This isn't a national election yet, so stop saying Barack will not be able to contest with the republican tactics. They can't even find a leader in that party.

We need to change the discourse in politics. Support Honesty and Integrity.

john g   January 21st, 2008 4:24 pm ET

If Obama thinks that the clintons are making disengenous and dishonest attacks against him and his record then he is within his right to point that out. when hillary clinton attaks obama for being naive for advocating talking to our enemies, when she on the keith olberman show said the exact same thing a few weeks prior and critisized bush for the same thing that needs to be pointed out. When they attack him for complimenting reagan and saying that the republicans have been the party of ideas when hillary said prior that reagan was one of her favorite presidents and bill said the exact same thing about republicans in 2002 he needs to point that out. I mean bill's biggest accomplishment in 8 years was balancing the budget and welfare reform, both pushed on him by the republican congress that got into power as a result of his divisive political style . So stop whining and complaining about obama defendning himself. He could of course make legitimate clinton style attacks on them, but where would he start, I say with Mark Rich.

Figueroa   January 21st, 2008 4:22 pm ET

Obama should be the one leading this country by far.

We all know exactly what happens when you elect another canidate from the same family. You get people leading this world with "Uh...um....duh...." like Bush Junior, and if I'm not correct, isn't Hillary the one who was fighting for free health care 10 years ago? And then we found out that she was being payed by lobbyists to shut her trap?

Obama is somebody new, fresh, and clean. He hasn't done anything bad to American citizens, nor will he. I hope that some day Al Gore will give Obama all his support, because Obama well deserves it. Same as Edwards. John Kerry did it already, follow the trend and we will finally have a good president.

I don't have anything against a Woman being president, but if it were to be a woman, I would not pick Hillary at all.

Vote Obama '08!

Roberta Owens-Jones   January 21st, 2008 4:22 pm ET

I agree that Senator Obama is running against both the former president as well as Senator Clinton. Many comments have been made relative to Hillary Clinton's experience. It is difficult for me to understand how she consistently asserts that notion – and others perpetuate it. (It is also difficult to understand who is actually the candidate for president, and for whom people are voting. Is it Bill Clinton or Hillary Clinton??)

Barack Obama has been a community organizer (no small feat), a State Senator, and now a U. S. Senator.

Obama has the experience, the character, the temperament, and the judgement to become the next President of the United States. He has my full support!!

OBAMA MAMA Twin Cities, MN   January 21st, 2008 4:21 pm ET

Hillary cries because everyone is picking on her!!! WAHHHHHHHH! Obama is quoted as speaking the truth and people say he's crying! Give me a break. Bill started his belly aching about voter intimidation in NV before the poles even opened so if his wife lost the popular vote he could scream "I told you so. I told you so. Voter intimidation!!!".
In NH he cried that his wife wasn't getting enough press (Edwards has whined about the same thing but in his case he has a point). Before the results come in at the primaries Billary starts to WHINE and CRY. They whined that people and the media were picking on them about their MLK and "fairy tale" comments when they were the ones that said them. Then they used the fallout to race bate Obama which backfired and they whined about that too. If Billary gets the nomination (God help us) half the Dems won't vote for her and not a single Rep or Indi will (that includes me). It will be another 4 years of Rep rule. Not to mention that if she does get the nomination (ain't going to happen) that Bloomberg will definately jump in and run as an Indi, further making it impossible for the Dems to win. Then we will definately see some tears from Billary!!!
Only Obama can get the votes Dems need to win (remember 2000 and 2004). It was too close the last two elections and the Dems are going to need all the votes they can get and only Obama is the one that can get those votes. Rep CAN"T pick him apart because he doesn't have the slime trailing down his back like Billary does. Can you imagine the ads Reps will run if they run against Billary. Reps will bring up every dirty (and I do mean DIRTY) back door deal Billary has ever been involved in (and there are so many to choose from it's scary). Reps can't WAIT to run against Bilary, they are scared to death to run against Obama. If Dems were smart (and by reading some of these Obama hater comments I'm starting to wonder about that) they would run, not walk away from Billary.
Like alot of americans I can't wait to see a woman in the white house (I am a woman with two daughters and a son) but not Billary. I am young and I know it will happen sooner then you think but I want the right person and I'm not going to support Billary just because part of the team is a woman. I want someone my children could look up to it ain't Bush, and it ain't Clinton, and it ain't Bush, and it ain't Clinton again (no more dynasties please). Based on Billarys behavior I can't believe I voted for Bill twice and I used to support Hill. Don't be fooled people, we can have the prosperity without the scandal.

Obama 08

Matthew   January 21st, 2008 4:21 pm ET

WAAAAAAAAAA waaaaaa waaaaaaa

Do you need some tissue Oprama?

Classic case of you can dish it out but you can't take it.

Karen   January 21st, 2008 4:21 pm ET

If Bill wants to be the 'First Gentleman' , then he has to act like one.

Let's imagine Jackie Kennedy, Barbara Bush, Laura Bush taking jibes at their husbands political opponents.

If Bill was a woman the American people would be appauled.

Will Bill sit with Hilary at the Whitehouse everytime she is having rough time and pinch hit for her.

This is not democracy this is Clintocracy!

darrell   January 21st, 2008 4:20 pm ET

GOP is not saying anything ???

because of the Dem. divide

GOP again 08

Tennyson   January 21st, 2008 4:20 pm ET

Newsweek January 21,2008 analysed Bill Clinton's comments on Obama's record. Read the article "The Incremental Revolutionary" and you will conclude that Bill's comments were deliberate attempts to distort the record and misrepresent the facts.

He has reminded me of that day he looked me earnestly in the eye and said from my television set "I never had sexual relations with that woman".

If she wins the nomination Hilary will become the first Democratic candidate for any office for whom I did not vote. I do not want another president I cannot trust.

jenny   January 21st, 2008 4:16 pm ET

CLINTON-OBAMA or OBAMA-CLINTON 2008. As democrats, this is the team we need to defeat the republican come this November. This is a note to everyone who is a democrat. We have to UNITE to have change happen. If you look at their stands, they are both the same.
your friend,
Jenny

Ross   January 21st, 2008 4:15 pm ET

Bill Clinton is fighting for what is rightly theirs, the presidency belongs to the Clintons. Bush had it before then and Clinton before that. I can't wait for 2016 when Jeb Bush takes over. The Bush – Clinton rotation rules America. Long live our ruling family.

Tim, Seattle   January 21st, 2008 4:14 pm ET

BlueRay said: "She is, after all, the front runner and most likely to win the nomination"
Wrong again, BlueRay!
Obama is ahead in the delagate race by 2 delagates. SO technically, Obama is the front runner. DOnt get ahead of yourself!

Stan Washington   January 21st, 2008 4:14 pm ET

Its not fair or unfair. Its not whining or standing strong. President Bill Clinton held the most powerful position in the world. Just like every elected president. Respect is earned and deserved when elected. Now that he is out of office, he needs to respect the position and play the role of a statesman when it comes to politics. Place the husband support at a husband support level. Bashing others at all costs is not presidential. Respecting the position of President is what Bill Clinton is not representing. Hilary needs to recognize before it takes the entire Democratic party down.

obama 08   January 21st, 2008 4:13 pm ET

It’s really sad to see the Clinton Machine bring down a man that brings so much hope to our nation. If America chooses the Clintons, then I guess America deserves all the bad things it’s going to get once they get to the White House. So sad. Nobody seems to be giving the Clintons any credit for all the bad media circulating, including the race issue. They know what they’re doing. Politicians are always going to be corrupt, and the Clintons are always going to lie to be on top. How pathethic. And to all those supporting the Clintons, it makes sense that you're less educated!

Don   January 21st, 2008 4:12 pm ET

Lynn, you must only watch the news. Hillary is out campaigning with a positive message. I have seen her twice now and never has she resorted to sly attacks, unlike her two rivals. Hillary speaks passionatly about her plans to put our country back on track. Its unfair to imply that Hillary does anything less. In the two speeches I have been fortunate to witness, Clinton has always praised both Obama and Edwards. If talking about her record is attacking, then she is one vicious women, because she has a great record. Stop watching shows that tell you what to think. They are alreadty starting up again and its more for ratings( debate and specials tonight) than what is really happening in this campaign. Sound bites and edited speeches to not do any justice to any of these canidates. Hillary has always ran a positive campaign, but when she has been questioned, she fights back. Thats what I want in a President.

JG, Seattle WA   January 21st, 2008 4:09 pm ET

Quite frankly, none of the Democratic candidates appeal to me. As the very definition of a middle of the road voter (I voted for Ronald Reagan, George Bush Sr and Bill Clinton), I'm having a hard time getting excited about Hillary or Obama.

I'm not all that excited about any of the Republican candidates, either, but right now I'd have to vote for McCain over either Hillary or Obama.

For Mr. Obama   January 21st, 2008 4:08 pm ET

Obama, please grow up and stop whining. You said you want to change the political scene in this country? Then when you started playing dirty, tricky and slimy politics, the reverse of what you are preaching, expect it to be thrown back to you. Most smart voters would not fall into your trap. You are demonstrating that you are just another politician who sets his own rules of dirty politics.
Hillary for president all the way.

Joe, Chicago   January 21st, 2008 4:07 pm ET

Obama is not whining at all.

Bill Clinton's recent interjections are questionable and devisive. He can say whatever he wants to help get Hillary elected. He is her husband and he wants to see her win- but that doesn't mean he is being honest with his airtime!!

Obama has handled his campaign and the past weeks since Iowa with an extraordinary amount of class and candor. Reading some of the comments here, maybe America is not ready for that just yet.

But I hope so. Obama '08.

marie   January 21st, 2008 4:06 pm ET

I’m amazed with the way some are so critical of Hillary and how she and Bill resolved their personal crisis. Yes he lied, probably the only man to ever have done so in this situation. The bigger story to me in all of this is that Hillary and Chelsea forgave him. I’m not ignorant; I don’t have my head in the sand. I simply see real people caught up in a not so uncommon occurrence. The more difficult thing for her to do I feel was to hold her family together and forgive. I simply don’t buy the story she only did it to be president. Not everyone has a June and Ward Cleaver style family. But everyone has the ability to forgive.

brian   January 21st, 2008 4:06 pm ET

Is this a campaign or nursery school? Bill said the truth. In 2002 he was against the war, 2004-he said his possition was the same a Pres. Bush, now he's against it. So, Bill called him on it. What is wrong with that. This is not popularity contest people, it's the office of the President of the US.

I ask all democrats to please, please use your heads and look these things up.

JG, Seattle WA   January 21st, 2008 4:05 pm ET

I'm a bit concerned that a husband and wife both can be elected to President. After all, a President should be limited to 8 years in the White House. What if a wife or a husband is merely a figurehead for the other? Isn't that, in fact, violating the purpose of the Constitution?

In my opinion, when either a man or a woman is President, his wife/husband also is the President. So I really think we need to toss out this type of stuff. Are you telling me we don't have a better candidate in all the US than somebody married to a former President? Please. It's all just dirty, dirty, dirty.

Chrissy, TX   January 21st, 2008 4:05 pm ET

Oh Obama. You say you want to unite the country but yet you can't handle a little critisism. Didn't you do your homework before you announced your candidacy for the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA! Please, the Clinton's have been critized their entire political careers. Your complaining that you feel you are fighting against two Clinton's, welcome to the game of politics!!!!!! What did you think, because you are black (well half, you are half white too) that all black people were going to jump on the bandwagon and give you all their votes. That's an insult. You remind me of a person that everyone liked, thought they could relate to, could unite and look what eight years has brought to this country....... MISERY!!!!!!!!

Mike   January 21st, 2008 4:05 pm ET

I'm no longer a Bill Clinton fan. Though he's in an unprecedented situation with his wife running for president, his "bad cop" campaign role is a shameful and disgraces the very office his wife is trying to acquire.

DLV   January 21st, 2008 4:04 pm ET

This is typical Clinton tactics. Obama is not "whining" about it, he's calling them out on distorted facts. It's a historical fact that Regan created change and ideas.
HRC supporters should all do a little fact checking before spouting off.

How many of you really support Hillary for her positions? How many of you can confidently speak to her positions? How many of you simply like the name Clinton?
Just because the Clintons are targeting the G.E.D crowd, doesn't mean you all can't do a little homework.

mike, il   January 21st, 2008 4:03 pm ET

For all those saying that is Obama's first test and he is whining, and can't handle it, do you not remember Hilary being brought to tears not by any attacks just the campaigning itself. The campaigning brought her to tears and Obama can't handle it....

Karen   January 21st, 2008 4:03 pm ET

I used to like Bill Clinton. Now I've lost all respect.

Yes, Obama is with the 'big boys' but why must the Clintons use negatives to get back at him? Can't sophisticated americans see through this spin cycle?

Does American want a Bush I/Clinton1/Bush II/Clinton II string of presidents.

I would not be surprised if Chelsea runs for a seat in Congress, then Senate and finally takes a run at the Presidency.

Start anew people, let go of the Clinton legacy.

Nicholas - Rocklin, CA   January 21st, 2008 4:03 pm ET

If OBAMA is whinning and crying about having to take on the candidate's spouse, how does he think he will be able to take on the Republican onslaught once the nominations are decided? They will be much more relentless with their attacks on Sen. Obama. He is just proving he is NOT up to the job of taking on the Republicans. Hillary has stood up to them since 1992. She has withstood them, and always overcame them. She will do it again this November. –Nicholas, Rocklin CA

Rosa, b'ham al   January 21st, 2008 4:03 pm ET

Quit whining and get back to work.

Pee   January 21st, 2008 4:03 pm ET

sam chan..................when will chinese like black people?

NickNas   January 21st, 2008 4:01 pm ET

I HATE to say this but even DADDY BUSH didn't act this stupid when his Baby boy was running. Relax Bill

To the people who keep whineing can't take the heat.

Do you REALLY think this is how the worlds leaders all act?? You have been too buried in the Bush and Rove politics too long.

Calling names and spreading lies everytime you get in front of a camera JUST in time so that they cannot be refuted before a vote is LAME!!!!!

Hillary gets the NOM WE LOSE!!!!!

TOO many Dems will NOT Vote for her NO MATTER WHAT. and 99.9% of repubs HATE her

darrell   January 21st, 2008 4:01 pm ET

Edwards will possibly be another ROSS PEROT

Edwards will be a Hillary’s spoiler.

Watch!

Many of Hillary supporters are going to switch their vote to Edwards as a second Choice.
Sending a strong message to Hillary, We are united as country wanting change from the old Washington status quo.

Hillary may actually place third

Change we can believe in because all Americans are enlisted in it.

Obama 08

Al   January 21st, 2008 4:00 pm ET

The Republican War Machine is loaded and they will show no mercy.. so grow a pair and stop the whining.

Margaret Porter   January 21st, 2008 4:00 pm ET

Senator Obama is running against both Clintons. I feel that if Senator Obama keeps this a clean campagn as truthful as he is doing and try not to do the dirty tricks that the Clintons pull he will do fine. If the Clintons think that Obama is a threat either or both Clintons act like 2 year olds when they don't get their way.
They are never wrong. It is either a right wing conspiracy or a left wing conspiracy.
I hope the people of America wake up before the convention and we are not stuck with a Clinton. Hillary Clinton does not care about us the American people. All she wants is to be the first woman president. A woman president is ok but not this one.

Senator Obama is not running just for the black people, the white people, yellow people etc. He is running for president for every one.

Senator Biden was telling the truth when he said he would not want the vice-president position with Hillary Clinton.

I feel that ex-president will be on the ticket as vice-president.

Haven't we had enough with president Bush, Bush senior Chenny and Rowe are running the country now. Do we really need Bill Cinton running the country for the next 8 years?

Keep up the good work Senator Obama. My prayers are with you to win as the candidate for president.

obama08   January 21st, 2008 3:59 pm ET

Superdelegate Jay Inslee endorsed HRC in Summer 07 because, in his words when asked why: "it's hard to say No to Bill Clinton." That is strong-arming, folks. It's like the mafia making "an offer you can't refuse". This is how HRC established a long list of superdelegate endorsements (representing real convention votes) early on. That is not the way a president should be elected to office in a functioning democracy.

Lynn   January 21st, 2008 3:56 pm ET

I suppose that if Obama is "whining" based on his complaint that Bill Clinton, a former president, is acting like a lying bully, then Ted Kennedy and Rahm Manuel, two very respected members of Congress, are likewise "whiners" because both called Bill Clinton and told him to pipe down.

Bill Clinton has two modes: Bullying liar, and condescending liar. He can't bring himself to tell the truth any longer. It makes me wonder why so many respected members of Bill Clinton's old team went with Obama instead of Hillary Clinton this time around. Why would they do that?

Jake   January 21st, 2008 3:54 pm ET

Fact: Clinton thinks that taking $800,000 worth of federal lobbyist money is ok because they represent "real americans."
Fact: At the New Hamphire Debates lied about Obama's record on the PATRIOT ACT and implied that one of Obama's advisors was a federal lobbyist. Although he is a lobbyist, he is a state lobbyist that doesn't buy Washington Politicians. Huge difference.
Fact: Clinton pounced on Obama at the Youtube debates for saying he would talk to the leaders of Iran and other politically corrupt countries. She later on praised JFK for his willingness to talk to other foreign leaders.

Fact: Clinton lies and deceives voters and is the same old politician. She is no candidate for change. If she wins the nomination I will never vote for her.

darrell   January 21st, 2008 3:54 pm ET

Billary is Strong LOL

Question: what happen to Hillary the supposed backbone to bill.

Billary sounds better

Kerry did not have to endure this from his own Dem. Party

A Stronger Obama is emerging.

Obama 08

NickNas   January 21st, 2008 3:54 pm ET

Hillary Clinton without Bill would be NOTHING. Where did she do anything in her career independant of his elected offices???? Wake up people. I USED to support Bill but he seems to be as desperate as she is to live in that house again.

JJ in Chula Vista, CA   January 21st, 2008 3:51 pm ET

Nalla:

Yes, Hillary's last name is Clinton, was an attorney before being the First Lady... but last time I checked, she's also been a Senator for many years now... Don't forget to mention that part.

mv   January 21st, 2008 3:49 pm ET

To all the Hillbilly supporters out there:

You all make reference to Sen. Obama's "whining". When Sen. Clinton was asked about how she was dealing with her marathon campaign wasn't it her that actually broke down and cried. She can't even keep it together for the campaign, how is she going to handle life in the white house? Does she think it will be a walk in the park? Oh, thats right...it will be BECAUSE SHE HAS BILL TO FIGHT HER BATTLES AND DO HER DIRTY WORK

Why wouldn't Bill lie? Hes done it before!!

OBAMA IN 08'

Art   January 21st, 2008 3:47 pm ET

If there was anything that Barack could have said that would convince me that he is not ready for the White House it has to be complaining about Bill helping Hilary. I don't remember Hilary whining about Barack playing the Oprah card, which carried the legions of her following along with the issue of playing the color card. Our next president has to be ready for our adversaries to throw the curve ball. Will we stand and simply hope or complain about how unfair when Ben Laden sends his female suicide bombers after us? What would Barack do when an adversary sends his / her ships to bring ICBM's to shores just 90 miles away from America, hiding nuclear subs under freighters to avoid detection. Would he simply stand by and Hope they will turn back or is he prepared to tell our ships to take the adversaries ships out of the ocean? That was a tense time but I knew that our President had the brass to do what he had to do, and not simply stand around hoping. We need someone who has brass and not simply words and hope.

JB Boston MA   January 21st, 2008 3:47 pm ET

Why is it that my posts don't even pop up under moderation?????

My posts have been disappearing fro weeks now. None posted. Prior to this I have been a contributor to this site for many months. What did I do?

Still a Clinton fan...but he needs to chill   January 21st, 2008 3:46 pm ET

I am a big fan of Bill Clinton...but he needs to chill out a bit and refocus on what his wife does well. If Hilary has something to say she should come out and say it. Obama should call her on this tactic.

sam chan   January 21st, 2008 3:46 pm ET

Barack Obama is portraying himself as a leader, but it is not clear what type of leadership qualities he posseses. He has not proposed any meaningful legislation since he became a senator in 2004. He has not shown any leadership quality that matters, in the senate. He has not sacrificed his life towards any cause like Dr. Martin Luther King did . Obama talks about change but is not specific about his changes other than pulling out of Iraq. Even on that issue he does not have a clear gameplan that will work for this country, and the middle-eastern countries including Iraq.

Beyond sound bites, and pleasing comments to try to win some votes in the democratic primaries his vision & goals lacks substance. He is not in tune with the problems this country faces today, nationally and globally. We have so many priorities to address, but Obama is not into these issues. He lacks experience on those high priority economi, security and social issues that a new president will have to tackle from Day One of the Presidency!

Appealing to black voters, college students and other special groups is nonsense. He has to resort to these vote getting tactics because OBama has no real meaningful message for the middle class of America, for people who want better economic prosperity, people who want to get out of debt, and for small businesses that are suffering due to the onset of recession.

OBama wants people to dream of a 'BIG Change' if he wins. But as a democratic voter, I am not going to be fooled into believing in his false dreams.

To address the nations priorities & goals, the nation will need a stronger leader, who is more savvy about the economy and who has a clear vision on what is required to fix this nation's problems. Our nation deserves a better person who can show some action and results.

Politics_Is_A_Dirty_Game   January 21st, 2008 3:44 pm ET

I admire both candidates and their supporters. In polictics its about getting on top. The dirty tricks are yet to begin, so both Obama and Clinton need to show there strength against criticism..and their strength in being the stronger candidate against controversy-staying focused..
Everyone of Clinton's or Obama's supporters has a every right to say what they want to say to get that vote which includes Bill Clinton and Michelle Obama. It should be up to us the people to cast the vote for the best candidate. When candidates start whining about other candidate's spouses power that becomes a problem..Are we going to see whining when confronted by problems from people in the likes of Chavez, Ahmadinejad, Jong-il and the likes of Al-Quaeda still out there. The Obama's need to concetrate and make their supporters beleive in him not wonder what these attacks depict of him as a leader and how he handles minor conflicts. The same goes for the Clintons. Both candidates have their powerhouses supporting them and each one has their own level of influence. Former President Bill Clinton...and former assistant to the Mayor Michelle Obama are some of those power houses before we extend to looking at all the other endorsers. Stay on course and court our vote before we lose hope!!!

Mary   January 21st, 2008 3:44 pm ET

I actually find it offensive that Obama would try to play these stupid games in a time when the majority of the American people are so aware of what is REALLY happening. The media, led by their republican owners, are trying to divide the democratic party by continually reporting about poor Obama and his inability to stand up to the big, bad Clintons. It's funny that he wasn't afraid to tag team with Edwards and attack Hillary early on. They say President Clinton shouldn't be negative because of his position as an elder statesman? When has that ever stopped a former President from speaking their minds? Never. No need to start now. To the Clinton campaign: Whatever you do, don't try to stop Bill from speaking out!

Mati   January 21st, 2008 3:44 pm ET

Macunaima January 21, 2008 2:56 pm ET
Does anybody really think that a "young" Obama is running alone against the "powerful Clinton machines" ? If you do, you don;t undertand politics in this country. Obama has abig political machine and money"

Absolutely TRUE. So its just politics, Mr. Obama play the game or get out. I keep asking who actually supports Obama? His only quality is that he can manipulate the crowds, lets face it.. He pretends being by himself, do you really believe this?

Blueray98   January 21st, 2008 3:43 pm ET

I’m sick of hearing “Obama” this and “Obama” that. He’s gotten a free ride to the top, thanks to the media who just love him. Anytime I look at the newspaper or online, it’s all about Obama. Completely unfair coverage. And everything I read seems to say “Obama and Clinton” when it should be the other way around. She is, after all, the front runner and most likely to win the nomination. She has the media against her, and yet she is winning which means she has worked hard for all of the votes she is getting. Obama can’t say the same, if he wins it sure must feel hollow, considering the free ride he’s received from the media.

Dorian, Brentwood, Ca   January 21st, 2008 3:43 pm ET

To Sheryl, Tampa Bay: I had not heard about Obama's demand that the media not make any comments about his ears. If true, this guy is really shallow. He's got much more than his ears to be worry about. As an aside: doesn't he think we've noticed that he has ears and that they stick out? Good Lord! No problem with sticky-outy ears unless, of course, one continues to whine and complain constantly. Then someone just may get the urge to rip them off.

Mark, CA   January 21st, 2008 3:43 pm ET

toni, your comment amuses me:

January 21, 2008 9:29 am ET

Stop whing Obama! This proves you are not strong enough to be elected president . We need someone tough, not someone who's going to whine at the slightest provocation.

so what you're apparently saying is you need someone "tough" right? sort of, like the type of person that's going to cry when she gets emotional? yeah thats the type of "tough" and strong leader the US needs right now. you clinton supporters are a piece of work.

Lynn   January 21st, 2008 3:43 pm ET

Here is my question, and it's a very simple one: If Hillary Clinton is such a great candidate, then why can't she go out there and campaign with a positive message about her accomplishments and her plans for the future? It seems she can't do that, and instead apparently feels the need to cry, refuse to answer questions, and have her husband play the bully and flat-out lie about Obama. If Hillary were such a great candidate, she wouldn't need to do those things. It kind of tells you something about all this "experience" she supposedly has. I encourage anyone who is interested in being fair about this whole thing to watch her performance in Meet The Press last weekend. She spent almost no time talking about herself and her own policies; rather, she spent time talking about the accomplishments of the Bill Clinton administration (while disavowing any knowledge whatsoever of the bad things Clinton did, i.e., the pardons, etc.), and the vast majority of her time criticizing Obama. That is not a positive message. I got a real laugh last week listening to an interview with HRC on NPR's "All Things Considered." The interviewer asked her about her position on making Social Security fiscally viable, and she immediately tried to launch into a mischaracterization of Obama's plan. The interviewer didn't let her get away with it and stopped her mid-sentence, saying "I asked about YOUR plan." Why can't she positively answer questions like that? I really don't understand it. If she truly has this huge edge over Obama in experience and planning, you'd think she'd want to talk about it. But she can't or won't.

And as for those of you asking why people refer to her as "Hillary" instead of using her full name or "Senator Clinton," you should watch her own campaign ads. All of them refer to her as "Hillary." Why should we call her anything different?

Mike in Kentucky   January 21st, 2008 3:42 pm ET

I would point out that Senator Obama choose to enter this race, knowing full well who his opponents were and what resources they could bring to bear.

Now he appears to be unhappy that Hillary's husband , Bill, has turned out to be an involved and effective campaingner.

Any candidate who did not realize that ex-President Bill Clinton would actively and forcefully support his wife's very deserving run for the Presidency is much too naive to be the President.

Grow up! You are playing in the Big Leagues now.

Annie   January 21st, 2008 3:40 pm ET

The Independent voters will vote for Obama, a third party candidate, or for the Republican (especially if it is McCain). They want this country to go into a new direction, but they want a respectible person to lead the way. If Hillary wins the nomination, they will not vote for her, because her husband is the reason that many of them became Independent in the first place, and the rest want the Congress to work to get things done, and with Hillary in office it will be 4 more years of politics as usual.

Mac in Nova Scotia   January 21st, 2008 3:39 pm ET

Do you want a Commander in Chief who cries under pressure and who calls out her husband to fight her battles? Do you want give Bill Clinton a third term as President and another chance at the White House Interns? I hope not.
If you want to elect a woman President then wait until a real woman runs for it.
You have a chance to heal the country by electing a President who brings high ideals and hope. Vote Obama.

jared   January 21st, 2008 3:37 pm ET

Wow. Obama is defending himself, FINALLY, from the false claims made by the Clinton campaign and now all you Clinton supporters call him a whiner. You are terrible.
I can't believe some people think CNN is biased towards Obama. Maybe you should actually watch their coverage and then you will see that they are indeed for Clinton.

molly gonz   January 21st, 2008 3:36 pm ET

Seriously! Cut with the Obama is a whiner talk! Who cried on national TV?????? Hillary...sorry, but that speaks manipulation at it's peak.

honest voter   January 21st, 2008 3:31 pm ET

I would like to be able to voice my opinion on the sc black women voters having a hard decision on voting not knowing to vote for race or gender, its not a matter
of race or gender in this election anymore its a matter of being "UNIQUE" and
the most "GENUINE" in political views and the person that has my vote ladies
on that topic is OBAMA !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Noans   January 21st, 2008 3:31 pm ET

I find it disturbing President Clinton is stooping to Karl Rove tactics instead of remaining on point with the issues. Old Bill is trying to distort Obama's record as a diversion to keep his (Clinton's) record, especially the signing of NAFTA, that is responsible for putting so many Americans out of work, as well as the 8% tax break President Clinton gave to the wealthiest Americans, ( Bush gave them 5%), out of the conversation. Between Hillary playing the gender and certainly the victim card (I became nauseated by her appearance on Tyra Banks show where she played the victim card like a pro,) and Bill losing his cool and distorting the facts, as well as his own record, reeks of politics as usual. We've seen this before folks. Bill and Hillary's actions speak to the old guard in Washington. We desperately need new blood, new ideas and new hope in Washington. Let's not become distracted by Bill and Hillary's distortion of the facts. I wonder why the press hasn't asked Hillary if she will repeal NAFTA immediately, if she's really serious about jobs for so many out of work Americans that she helped put out of work. Hillary supported NAFTA. and Bill's tax breaks for the super rich. More examples of Hillary's judgment and experience. And if she's for transparency, let her release her letters and written communication while in the White House for all to see. Instead, Bill sealed her communication, that Hillary could easily release for all of us to see, if she was serious about transparency in government. Hillary is too much like Bush who also continues to refuse to release his letters, memos, emails, etc.

Remember, President Clinton lied under oath so I guess lying on the campaign trial is second nature. Bill lied about his record for the war. (He supported it) Lied about he and President Bush 41 becoming "roving ambassadors if Hillary is elected" was another lie he was caught in when Bush 41 said no way and the list goes on. I'm not sorry I voted for Bill Clinton but his time has passed. I think Bill and Hillary are like Bush, lame ducks.

It's sad to see Bill and Hillary so desperate and unprofessional. We've had 8 years of Clinton, 12 years of the Bush's ( 4-Bush 41, 8-Bush 42). It's time for a honest President who won't continue to sell America and Americans out to the highest corporate bidder as Bill and Hillary did and have. Just look at the Clinton's voting record; it speaks for itself. I'm glad Obama doesn't have Hillary's experience and judgment.

francesca Dems Abroad   January 21st, 2008 3:29 pm ET

why is my comment " awaiting moderation"? I probably did repeat what others said, I couldn´t read all the comments. What´s up?

Can you believe?   January 21st, 2008 3:28 pm ET

I can't believe I read every single comment and I must say that I am up in arms about what people really think. If one more person says, "If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen." I will throw up. Are you serious? And people need to show some respect to both SEN. Obama and Former President Bill Clinton. None of this Mr. Obama and Mr. Clinton. Both of these gentlemen have earned the titles that they have by their constituency and they deserve respect.

With the housekeeping out of the way on the the point. Sen. H. Clinton is not the best person to be President of the United States. Not at this point in time in our countries history. In the absence of other viable choices maybe but, with the rise of Sen. Obama she must recognize that now is not her time. The American people are tired of the same old politics. And its not about her campaign either. People are tired of the Bush(4)/Clinton(8)/Bush(8)/(possibly Clinton) dynasty. So what you Hilary supporters are asking for is over 20 years of the same people making the decisions that affect the direction of the country? When Sen. Obama speaks of change this is what he means people. Please show some level of intelligence and read between the lines.

Secondly, this notion that she has 35 years of experience is mind boggling to me. I'm not historian but I will say that Nancy Reagan decided to run for President she would have just as much experience, if not more, than Hilary. This notion that because you are the wife of the President and he comes to you and asks for advise & maybe you sat in on some meetings, this makes you qualified to be President, I need to move to Canada because this means we are no longer choosing our leaders based on experience but their name alone(GWB). I have followed the Clinton's since 1988 when Bill was still the Governor of Arkansas and I can say that while he had my support in 1992 and 1996, Hilary will not have my support in 2008. I am a staunch Democrat and proud of the fact but, if she is the nominee I will vote for Mike Bloomburg or vote against her and vote for a Republican!

It makes me sick to my stomach to read some peoples comments because they cant see past their support for their candidates to see the truth. I have read both leading Democrats issue papers and I must say that Obama's are by far the most in-depth and well thought out of them all. TO ALL DEMS: Hilary WILL NOT win the general election in Nov. As you may have seen the Republican are all over the place and they have no idea who their nominee will be because they all have fundamental flaws within their party. But one thing is true, the Republican know how to win and come the parties conventions the Republican will unite around the defeat of Hilary if she is the eventual nominee. They may not like each other but they don't like her even more. She has not won the Independent vote in none of the primaries/caucuses & she will not in the General Election.

Sen. Obama is right to call Bill Clinton out and make the issue known that he is running against two people. Lets be clear about this people: Michelle Obama and Elizabeth Edwards are not ex-Presidents. They are merely the spouse of a candidate. When any ex-President speaks people listen. I would have considered supporting Hilary if Bill had come out and said, "I support my wife in her bid for the Presidency and I believe she is the best candidate but, I will NOT be campaigning for her because I would not want to inject undue biased into the race or appear impartial because she is my wife and it would not be fair to the other Democrats if an ex-President were merely supporting his wife and not the best candidate." But he did not do that and consequently he is causing serious harm to his legacy as an B+ president (A+ compared to the jackhole we have now).

The Clintons have resorted to lies and distortion. Please people before you post a comment do some research. Obama's stance on the war from the start have always been against. He voted to fund the war because they didn't have enough support in the Congress to pass a filibuster and Bush vowed to veto any legislation with a timetable. And the last thing you want is your troops in harms way and they don't have the resources they need to be safe. PEOPLE USE YOUR HEADS!!! If he voted against it these same people that call him a flip-flopper would call him a troop deserter. Give me a break!

To all of you Hilary supporter: She WILL LOSE IN 08 so jump ship now or you will be disappointed again like in 2004 with John Kerry. She was for the war in 2002 because she didn't want to be seen as weak on foreign policy when she decided to run for President (that has backfired because an incompetent President fumbled the aftermath of the war) and now she says is was "not a vote for war but for diplomacy". She wont even admit that it was a vote for war when everyone knew that it was. So either shes dim and incompetent herself or she is a liar, flip flopper or whatever you want to call her. The Republicans will use this against her in the General to galvanize their base.....trust me on this. The Republican will also beat her on the notion of experience. If they run John McCain she can no longer use the experience arguement cause he has her beat so what is her argument for the Presidency? CHANGE! Which she is running against now & is losing.

Sen. Barack Obama is the only way we can win in 2008. His track record of working with Republicans and Independents in Illinois is stellar. The primaries and caucuses have shown that he can win the Independent and Republican vote which will be needed to win decisively in Nov. We don't need another bitter, contested race in Nov and a 51-49 spit will not give the next president the mandate needed to get things done.

Chad   January 21st, 2008 3:27 pm ET

Boo Hoo. Obama tries to play the race card and looses. Now he's trying the crying card. If Oprah, who understand nothing of foreign policy, can draw huge crowds for Obama, then Bill Clinton can campaign for his wife. Is he going to wimper when the President of Iran doesn't play nice either.

Yes, America is ready for a black president. But that doesn't mean the Obama is the right man for that job. Let's face it, he's not qualified, black or white.

Jenny, Worcester MA   January 21st, 2008 3:25 pm ET

The Germans were surely united under Hitler for change. A lot of good it did.

So, until you know what kind of change Obama wants to bring about, until you know what you're buying, you are a fool to hang your "hope" on him.

Demand he spell out his principles and plans, and prove you as a voter are intelligent enough to differentiate shell from substance.

Steve, Lyons, CO   January 21st, 2008 3:24 pm ET

Is there an Obama supporter running this site?

Where the hell are my posts?

Daniel   January 21st, 2008 3:24 pm ET

Obama is scared.

Hillary all the way!!!

Malu   January 21st, 2008 3:22 pm ET

In recent months "Change has been the word of choice".

Many candidates have proclaimed that they represent the change this country need.

But truly change will only hapen, if and when we elect a woman for the highest office position.

This is our chance to empower a women This is the time to make our voice hard. This is the time to vote for HILLARY CLINTON.

How can we NOT?

Judith Ferren Errol NH   January 21st, 2008 3:22 pm ET

I knew thw linton's couldn't run a clean campaign... Bill was good in the office of the WH, until his urges for sex got out of hand... but his administration did an awsome job cleaning up things... But the also put through some bad things for this country too such as Nafa, and a few others...

Hillary just won't show where all her expreience is in running a government , besides being married to a governor / president.... I was married to a head foreman of a company, and we talked a lot about the job, but I know I was never quailified to be a head foreman of that company...

No, I want Change in Washington, and that won't come from the Clintons.....I would love to see a ticket with Obama and Edwards on it, I think they would be a winning teamfor this country.

Clinton's have said ( it was Bill that said it) that they have become great friends with the bush's..... Personally I think they the clinton's think too much like the Bush's....

the Clinton's are fighting for two things:

1) For Hillary to be the first woman President in the USA

2) To go down in History as the first husband and wife to ever be President in the USA....

Well I'm not out to make Hillary and Bill Clinton a mark in History, my vote goes with Obama all the way.... if hillary were the democratic choice I would vote for Mc Cain, or with hold my vote.... I want Change not the same BS we've had for over 20 years in the WH.... GO OBAMA AND GET THEM GOOD.....

voter1   January 21st, 2008 3:20 pm ET

A lot of the Hillary supports stated that Obama is a whinner and not tough enough to win the Presidency. Maybe what Obama should do is stop his whinning and start crying like poor old Hillary.

suzie   January 21st, 2008 3:20 pm ET

Why doea everyone keep calling Obama black???? He's neither black nor white but bi-racial, and well educated to boot.

Sheryl, Tampa Bay   January 21st, 2008 3:19 pm ET

Obama demanded that the media not make any comments about his ears. What aren't you getting?

When Obama loses, I'll send him a one year supply of pampers as a parting gift.

Cheryl   January 21st, 2008 3:19 pm ET

Hillary is not up to the job she has to whine and call on bill to bail her out. She is a wasted case.

nicholas   January 21st, 2008 3:18 pm ET

Evas comment about elected families is on the mark. Sounds like the word Nepotism to me!

Sedrick   January 21st, 2008 3:18 pm ET

This is getting silly. Why not just direct some of this towards the Republicans or the current administration. Both Obama and the Clintons need to stick to the issues. In my opinion this back and forth bashing taints the Democratic effort as a whole. This all puts their integrity in question. Stop playing the media please. Keep it up and neither will be in office and we the American people will wind up in the hands of another tyrant.

Cheryl   January 21st, 2008 3:17 pm ET

Terri,

You are correct. They both are running for the Democratic Nomination. However, Hillary has shown she is not able to run a campaign on her own. Her campaign has resulted to dirty tricks voters not being able to vote in NV. They closed the doors to the polling place before they got there. They told people they could not vote. There are 300 complaints that will be filed with the NV DNC. How would you feel if you came to vote and they would not let you vote. It is a disgrace to be a democrate now days. We are now acting like Republicans. I use to be so proud to be a dem. Hell I will vote republican this election because of the Clintons if she goes to the General.

Norma Ann Labno   January 21st, 2008 3:16 pm ET

FOR THE DEMOCRATS TO WIN THE UP-COMING GENERAL ELECTION, THE
LESS INTENSE BICKERING BETWEEN THEM, THE BETTER IT IS FOR THE
DEMOCRATIC PARTY LATER!

I FERVENTLY WANT TO SEE A DEMOCRAT IN THE WHITE HOUSE AFTER THE
UP-COMING GENERAL ELECTION!

LET'S GET BACK TO FIGHTING FOR A DEMOCRAT IN THE WHITE HOUSE
AND LET THE BEST CANDIDATE WIN BASED ON THEIR ABILITY TO GET THE
JOB DONE WHEN THE CANDIDATE REACHES THE WHITE HOUSE!

THIS CAN BEST BE DONE BY STICKING TO THE ISSUES TO THE BEST OF
ONES ABILITY AND LEAVE THE INTENSE, UNECESSARY SNIPING AT THE
FRONT DOOR PLEASE!

"PULLING FOR A WIN FOR THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY THIS ELECTION YEAR!"

Ann

Sue in Raleigh   January 21st, 2008 3:16 pm ET

After reading through these comments, it is obvious there are a great number of sexist men out there who are feeling threatened by the prospect of having a woman finally in the White House. Well, there are women out there too who are threatened by the same prospect... and that is a concept this woman cannot understand.

Once Hillary Clinton is elected president, and she will be, she won't stand a chance in the media or with the general public because she will be crucified if even one of her policies fail. On the other hand, she will be discredited on the policies that do succeed as having accomplished it only with the help of Bill Clinton.

To even suggest that a woman is not capable of being a great leader of this country is a joke. I mean, look at the mess the US is in now after being led only by men. Why are men so stupid? Why are they always so threatened by women? I know the game they are really playing but if I express it here, CNN won't post my comments.

shawn   January 21st, 2008 3:14 pm ET

Just so I get this right. Bill Clinton, a convicted liar, is out to tell the truth about Obama? That's right, he didn't inhale, and he didn't have sexual relations with that woman. Furthermore, I'm sick of hearing about what Hillary's first day in the White House will be like. I'd rather know what her last last day will be like. Will she pardon criminals like Mark Rich, known to have business ties with Iran? Or will she also allow family members to suggest people for pardon like her brothers did with slick Willie? I'll vote John McCain before Hillary, and I've always voted democrat.

lisa   January 21st, 2008 3:11 pm ET

Someone please tell me: what exactly do the candidates stand for???? Does anyone really know?? Or are we all so caught up with race, gender and religious aspects of this political race that noone is even paying attention to what the candidates can do for our country.

Lets elect the first black president. He'll do wonders for the country.....well who says so. What does he stand for?

Lets elect the first woman for president. She'll do wonders for the country....well who says so. What does she stand for?

Edwards....Edwards who? It would seem he is forgotten about.

Let's get back to the basics of the election and choose our next president based on qualifications and nothing else. We have serious problems that need to be solved.

Yellow Dog Democrat   January 21st, 2008 3:11 pm ET

I've been a democrat all my life. I've NEVER voted for a republican in a presidential race. If Hillary gets the nomination and has McCain to run against ,I will be voting republican. The Clintons are just what you are seeing. They will do anything and destray anyone who gets in their political way.(George Bush tactics) Atleast McCain has integrety, shoots straight ,and dosn't take oprders from anyone. McCain and Obama both can pull independent voters, Hillary can't. I can't bring myself to join her after watching their operation thus far. Hillary can be easily beaten in a general election. If you want another republican administraion nominate Hillary. Electing Hillary will be more of the same politics we've had for years. Our country can't take it. Obama is our hope.

Larry Dickman - IA   January 21st, 2008 3:10 pm ET

If Hillary wins the election, it will be both Hillary and Bill as President. Not just Hillary.

LisaMpls   January 21st, 2008 3:08 pm ET

I agree with so many posts here that Obama needs to retool his campaign. He needs to start focusing on what he will do to solve our country's many problems. Complaining and whining does nothing but divide and make people stop listening. Step it up!

Hillary has my enthusiastic support in the MN caucus!!!

mb   January 21st, 2008 3:08 pm ET

Heh... he plays so dumb. *Of course* you're running against them both, that's sort of the point isn't it?

Sheryl, Tampa Bay   January 21st, 2008 3:08 pm ET

Geez, did Obama's supporters grow up watching soap operas and Oprah or something? I bet you love tabloids, too, right?

I don't know what the problem is. Obama has the backing of Oprah and other celebrities, as well as his own wife.

What makes Obama a candidate for change? Is it because he says so? Wake up. That's all he does is "say so". He gives no solid evidence that he has the ability to make it happen. Stop dreaming. This is a real country, not a fairytale romance novel. Real solutions need to happen in order for change to occur.

There is a common trend among Obama's supporters, and that is that they all comment on him like they're writing Shakespearean poesy under the influence of a cheap motivational speaker. Dreams do not equal reality.

Give Obama a chance? You're gambling with a country, not a chocolate pound cake that has more calories than angel food cake.

Oprah has too much class? Oprah lives in a dream world. If you have a problem with reality, then why should non-supporters of Obama want YOU choosing the next president (and fate) of this country?

Hmmm, I wonder if it's possible for American citizens who live in the real world to have Obama's supporters deemed unfit to cast a vote?

Deleted User   January 21st, 2008 3:07 pm ET

Shame on Sen. Ted Kennedy and Rep. Emanuel (who this morning were quoted on TV as having urged Bill to tone down)! They never asked Obama in the same manner as John Edwards and Hillary to tone down the lying Nevada radio admakers who broadcast falsehoods about Hillary's connection to the lawsuit. They never asked their Democractic Partymates like Sens. Leahy and Kerry and Gov. Napolitano to tone down their undeserved endorsements of Obama (as shown in the primary and caucus results favoring Hillary). The American people are entitled to hear about Obama as much as about John Edwards and Hillary. Ongoing is a big debate as to who best represents the Democratic party in the 2008 Presidential polls. A Debate always has 2 sides – the affirmative and the negative. Let's hear the negative side about Obama! Get on and on with debates. Let us not tone down Bill who speaks for the negative side of Obama which the American people are entitled to know. Obviously, Ted not being a lawyer is oblivious to the constitutional law prohibition against PRIOR RESTRAINT which is actually what he and Rep. Emanuel (who as a Congressman should likewise know Constitutional law) are doing. Worse, Ted and Rep. Emanuel, you are giving AID and COMFORT to the Republican Party. You should be ashamed of the disservice you are doing to your own party. It is you both who should tone down for the sake of the Democratic Party. We are behind you, Bill. Go on Bill – tell the American people what they need and deserve to know about Barack.

Russell MacDonald   January 21st, 2008 3:07 pm ET

Obama should call it quits. No way will the people of the USA elect a Black (or
mixed race) candidate. He has no experience and the only thing he has going for him is that he is a definite minority.

Finn   January 21st, 2008 3:06 pm ET

It's not whining when you are point out a truth – just because he has caught someone behaving porely and let people know that what they are saying is wrong does not mean he is whinining. . . It is sad that the Clintons are stooping again to this behavior to win – - they must realize what a true threat to their campaign Obama is.

Independent   January 21st, 2008 3:06 pm ET

Obama just convinced me that he doesn't have the strength to win against the reps next fall, but more important, to lead the most powerful country in the world. When will the rockstar effect wear off and reality set in?

Susan   January 21st, 2008 3:05 pm ET

Obama graduated from Harvard and was the president of the Law Review...that shows hard work and tremendous potential. He became a Christian later in life..that shows an ability to search for answers outside of himself. He is in a loving marriage..that shows commitment and stability....He overcame the tragedy of growing up in a broken home and not really knowing his father..that shows strength and courage...he overcame racism and became a United States Senator...he was vilified and misrepesented for his religion and his record...but remained honorable and decent...he is an American success story...he represents the good in all of us.

Ms. Pat in Iowa   January 21st, 2008 3:05 pm ET

The Clintons got nasty after Obama won here in Iowa, when they realized he was a threat. Sorry, but how can anyone want a lying philandering former President back in the White House is beyond me. While we should have been concentrating on terrorism (9/11 wasn't very long after Clinton left the White House) we were spending our resources on figuring out what "is" is and a stain on a dress. What a waste of Americans time and money. Why couldn't he tell the truth in the beginning and let us all move on.

I can never vote for HRC, so I am afraid I am watching the Republicans closely to see you I could support in case the dirty tricks prevail. Too bad, Democrats want to blow it again.

Go Obama! (I felt this way about the Clintons well before Obama was in the race, originally an Edwards supporter.)

Richard   January 21st, 2008 3:05 pm ET

Are American really so out of touch that they would decide who to vote for based on race or gender, rather than the most qualified person? This whole thing is really lost on substance and real issues. Any women that votes for Hillary because she is a woman or black person that votes for Obama becasue he is black is doing America a very serious injustice. Lets look at qualifications, not gender, not race, and not religion. You republicans out there, stop before you vote. I am not a Romney fan but realistically, before you vote, make sure you understand that the Mormons are really the only church that really preaches and practices "looking out for it's members" If a mormon loses their job, the church takes care of them till they find another. That is frankly how America should be, we should care for each other rather than just think about ourselves. PS. I am, not mormom. Vote for who is best qualified, become informed, America is at stake!

Laura   January 21st, 2008 3:04 pm ET

All of this talk about Obama whining is somewhat baffling when Hillary managed to literally WHINE during a press conference. Give me a break please. When Hillary lost Iowa she was the biggest cry baby ever. Also, as far as Obama being ready to stand up to big time politics as many have posted ;I believe he is ready although he cannot help it if he as more class and dignity and will not stoop to their treacherous levels. Besides if Hillary were to win the nomination I think the Republicans would literally roast her and we will be in the SAME boat we are in now!

I agree that Barack is definitely a movement by himself and I personally don't want another 4 years of a Clinton Whitehouse!

Xaviersm   January 21st, 2008 3:04 pm ET

Obama is playing with the big boys. If he can't handle the Clintons, then there's no way he can handle leaders of the world! I support Hillary because I believe she's the only one that clean Bush's mess. I hate how the media is playing the race card and making democrats look bad.

Wynter, Loudon, NH   January 21st, 2008 3:03 pm ET

So, Sen. Obama?? Are you kidding me? He is the spouse of the candidate for goodness sakes!

As for Axelrod's concerns about President Clinton's comments about Sen. Obama's record. If there was a concern where the facts were wrong I think we would have heard about it loud and clear by now.

But of course, the issue isn't that Bill is twisting the truth, but that Obama and his camp has been twisting his record all along and now that Bill is making it clear to the public "he can't stand the heat!" Obama and Axelrod have been throwing flower petals under Obama's record all this past year. Now that Bill Clinton is shining a bright light at it now we see the cracks in his story.

Don't refute his comments with whining, Axelrod. Respond with facts for a change or is your whole campaign "smoke and mirrors"?

Simply clear politics. Obama has spoken nothing but vague touchy feely hopes and dreams. No Facts, No specifics. Hillary has stated quite clearly what she would do to change things in Washington. Thats the change we need in the next presidential term. No false hopes, No pie in the sky fantasies.

Because in the end, wishing on a star will only give you a crick in the neck.

Vote Hillary.

Wynter,
Loudon, NH

Norberto   January 21st, 2008 3:02 pm ET

Hillary is not able to handle pressure. There have been numerous situations where she demonstrated this. From not being clear on providing illegal immigrants with driver's licenses, to the sobbing in New Hampshire, to now using Bill to win her the election, not to mention her big mistake on the allowing President Bush to invade a country that had nothing to do with 9/11. This woman is not suited for this position. She is mistake prone.

Eric   January 21st, 2008 3:01 pm ET

Sounds like Obama is getting desperate and looking for anything to boost his slowly sinking numbers.....what happened to the "change" that he has been talking about?

jenny   January 21st, 2008 3:00 pm ET

this BILLiary Clinton dynasty needs to be stopped. America does not have a monarcy government. Go Obama, good luck.

MR Nia   January 21st, 2008 2:59 pm ET

Why does america love coffee? Cause if we had enough tea, we could turn 50 states into 50 countries. hahahaha

Minnesota voter   January 21st, 2008 2:59 pm ET

first- what is this talk about running against both Obamas. Clintons are not the same, because one is FORMER PRESIDENT, who held office for 8 yrs. so do you think it;s the same???????
second- Obama a whiner??? I'm sorry i don't remember him crying on national TV.. ohh this job is so hard..ohh it takes a lot...come Hillary supporters!

Terri   January 21st, 2008 2:59 pm ET

A point here that should be made: it's interesting to me that he refers to running AGAINST anyone. He is running FOR the Democratic Nomination.

I am a strong Democrat, and maybe I'm old...In my day we ran AGAINST the Republicans, not other Democrats.

annette   January 21st, 2008 2:58 pm ET

First Obama is running for President of the United States not President of a sorority, club or college. He doesn't mind throwing out smears against the clinton's his self and he has done so just as much...just as his own campaign workers have done. He needs to stop wining because guess what the rest of the leaders in the world will do much more than put what he says and his track record in the forefront to tear apart. Grow up and stop using your time to complain about the tactics that he his self has also been using. Don't dish it out if you can't take it coming back your way!

Mike R   January 21st, 2008 2:58 pm ET

We are re-electing Bill, vicariously, of course. Many say it's a two for one deal. Hillary is just there for window dressing. Come on guys ...it's time you woke up. Given all that, I don't particularly want to go back to the Clinton era, anymore than I want another Bush to be in office, Jeb or some other member of that family.

It's time for a "real" change, not just a name change. For all the important things, there is no difference between establishment families like the Bush's or Clinton's. They all come from the same elite groups that subscribe to their own set of ideals, which by the way, have very little to do with the average American's ideals.

I suggest that you all do a little looking at the Trilateral Commission, Council on Foreign Relations, and Bilderburgers to see who runs this country and world.

These groups hand pick their members from the elite like the Bush and Clinton families. There is no election that is not in some part already decided by these powerful groups. Bush, Kerry and Clinton are all members of the Skull and Bones, the collegiate group that prepares for membership in the major league big three groups. Once a member, always a member. You figure it out.

LONG ISLAND DEMOCRAT   January 21st, 2008 2:57 pm ET

Empty promises is all that voters will find if the people go backward and put the wrong democrat into office. For my entire life growing up, there has dissapointingly been no CHANGE, NO CIVIL RIGHTS FOR ALL; DISPARAGED SCHOOLS/EDUCATION; LET ME NOT EVEN START ON THE CRISIS OF AIDS/HIV on Women on LONG ISLAND (highest rates in the nation occurring) – ALL IN YOU KNOW WHO'S BACKYARD, CHANGING NOTHING SINCE SHE'S BEEN THERE AND, JUST LIKE THE LOT OF THEM THAT DON'T REALLY CARE FOR ALL THE PEOPLE PER SE. AND, AS FAR AS MINIMIZING THE IMPACT MADE BY DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. PPPLEEAAAAAAAASE

In God WE Trust, SEN. Barack OBAMA for 2008!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

IF YOU WANT THE SAME O'L SAME, GOOD OLD BOYS SYSTEM AND OF EMPTY PROMISES THEN VOTE HILLARY

James   January 21st, 2008 2:57 pm ET

Oh come on people, Obama whining? I dont believe that. We saw what Billary did the other day and I didnt here nothing of that nature . . . can you imagine your president crying in front of cameras. Oh dear . . .

Macunaima   January 21st, 2008 2:56 pm ET

Does anybody really think that a "young" Obama is running alone against the "powerful Clinton machines" ? If you do, you don;t undertand politics in this country. Obama has abig political machine and money,

The complain about Bill Clinton only hurts Obama. Bill can say anything he wants. I care about what Bill says. He is sharp , intelligent and understands foreign policy.
Look at all these endorsementsd Obama receives everyday. I could not believe that John Kerry endorsed him. He should be quiet and wait . What a slap in the face to John Edwards.

I was interested in Obama at the beginnin but then he brought Oprah Winfrey in the campaign trail to get the women votes. I changed my mind.

What it matters is to win the White House. I would like to see a Hillary /Obama ticket. and then Obama could be president in 2016

Sick of lies   January 21st, 2008 2:56 pm ET

I'm voting for Obama because he focuses on bringing us all together, not keeping us divided. The Clintons are so "Washington" it makes me sick to my stomach. They'll say whatever it takes to win, and I'm sick of being lied to. "I did not inhale" and "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" are still too fresh in my mind to disregard. It disgusts me so much to see so many American's fall into the Clinton Brainwashing Trap highlighted Bill's bashing and Hillary's staged sobbing. GIVE ME A BREAK.

Mauri   January 21st, 2008 2:56 pm ET

Messages to Senator Obama. You claim a likeness to JFK, but your actions are 180 degrees from what he would have done. Instinctively knowing that he could not have banished Hillary's husband from her campaign, (no more than you can sideline Michelle), John Kennedy would have immediately brought out his own brand of humor and would have polished Bill Clinton off with one joke. Above all, no "poor-me" whining from JFK. Look at how John McCain has handled Chuck Norris and his "over-the-hill" age thing. Excellent example, Obama. One has to wonder what Senator Obama would do the first time Putin or the Iran president said to him, "Boo!"

Second, did you hear one peep from Hillary and handlers about Oprah Winfrey's stumping for Senator Obama? Did she say following Iowa, "Well I was running against Barak and Oprah."

Conclusion: Those who have said Obama is not ready have been proven right. And while he's waiting to be seasoned, he should spend the next four/eight years memorizing Politickin' 101. Nowhere in this course will one find a topic on "The Art of Whining." So, Senator Obama, listen to the immortal words of the mighty Joan Rivers: "OH GROW UP!!!"

James   January 21st, 2008 2:56 pm ET

But...isn't a vote for Hillary the same as a vote for Bill? Aren't twins one and the same?...

Hawk,Texas   January 21st, 2008 2:56 pm ET

Grow up Obama. if you cain't take a little heat now think what will happen down the road. this just goes to show that he dosen't have what it takes to be president. all i have seen him do is whine and cry poor me. i guess that all of his mud slinging at Hillary is all right. but he says don't pick on me. CRY BABY OBAMA.

Eva   January 21st, 2008 2:55 pm ET

How come we have the past few years people from the same families as presidents, havent we had enough with two Bushes and two Clintons? Is this democracy??

Ruth Mctizic   January 21st, 2008 2:55 pm ET

CHANGE........this word was personified by the Obama campaign....He has demonstrated that during his campaign....Perhaps if it had not been for the distortment of John Mccain's record in the republcan primary....he probably would be our president instead of George W. Bush who has truly screwed this country up . NOW, with President Clinton twisting and distorting Obama's words and record, the wrong person could end up being the nominee. Believe
me Hillary CANNOT win against a republican. People are already saying they will vote republican if she win because she wouldnot have become the nominee
if her campaign had been run credible. CHANGE......so all candidates will stick
to the issues, and disregard all candidates who use the slash and burn method of campaigning. CHANGE............. from the old stytle, and take this country forward with fresh ideas, new faces, and most of all a new begining.

Lili   January 21st, 2008 2:54 pm ET

I aggree Obama' point.
I do not want to have 2 famlies, Bush and Clinton, to control our country for so long!

Gwendy Robinson   January 21st, 2008 2:54 pm ET

I think Mr. Barack Obams, is so CORRECT BILL CLINTON, IS OUT OF LINE, he is not running for anything. And I am so SICK OF THE WHOLE CLINTON'S BUNCH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Mr. Obama, is a leader, I will be voting for him!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Mr. Obama can and will bring a needed CHANGE!

casilda james   January 21st, 2008 2:54 pm ET

Obama needs to grow up. How can he preside over the most powerful nation on earth if he can't swim with the sharks?

Sean McM   January 21st, 2008 2:53 pm ET

Poor boy! Now you know how your and John Edward's rude whispering and then ganging up on Hillary looked to those of us watching the NH debate.......that was an incredible moment....and Obama let bully John render the confrontation to HC of course.. Can't take a stand for what you have been elected to do? Your voting "present" in Illinois to avoid....your dismal record of Not Voting in the US Senate??? Are you a conflict avoider? Or are you really an underachiever!!!!!

Mateo   January 21st, 2008 2:53 pm ET

All whining aside, I would think a former President of the United States of America would hold himself to a different standard then this. But then again we are used to Bill's lies and do anything to get what he wants approach. I wonder what is really in it for him?

Janel, St. Paul, MN   January 21st, 2008 2:53 pm ET

I'm disturbed by the spirit of some of the emails I've read on this site.

Senator Obama is not a "whiner!" On the contrary, he has stood tall against some of the slanderous statements made by the Clinton's and some of their supporters.

That he has the courage to stand up for himself is, for me, something to applaud.

As I've followed the campaign, I have watched with much disappointment the comments made by our former president, who is using his stature to disqualify a solid candidate. . .one who has been endorsed by many distinguished American leaders. And I've been disgusted by his wife all of a sudden showing her "soft" side. Come on, folks!!

As for Obama flip-flopping, his vision has remained unchanged. However, it is pathetic that all of a sudden Senator Clinton has used "Change" in her campaign. And now - after belittling Senator Obama for his statement that he would be willing to meet with some of our adversaaries - Senator Clinton states this is what SHE will do.

I have no problem with individuals explaining their support for the Clintons, but to call Senator Obama a "whiner" is really a "below-the-belt and untrue charge.

Dana   January 21st, 2008 2:53 pm ET

To all of you Obama supporters I can only assume you are either too lazy or too stupid to do a little research before you post your comments. Bill Clinton didn't say anything that wasn't true about Obama. It's verifiable. Look it up. The Clintons didn't make this a race issue. That was done by Michelle Obama. Once again, verifiable. Look it up.

To those of you fixated on the fact that Bill cheated on Hillary and then lied about it.
Grow up. If you're Democrats: How self-righteous you are. I'm sure none of you have ever done anything you shouldn't have and I'm sure none of you have ever lied about it. If you're Republicans: Well... your opinion doesn't count. You would do anything to discredit a Democrat. As a matter of fact, you did such a good job of harping on Bill's indiscretions we got Bush for 8 years. Thanks. Well done.

Please vote responsibly. Support a candidate that is actually qualified to be president. You can wiki both Clinton and Obama and and at least inform yourselves of their achievments and histories.

Obama is just a man and doesn't deserve blind faith. If you look close enough you'll see Obama has skeletons in his closet too. Check out his Illinois history. He has some scandals of his own to contend with.

If you actually take the time to do the research you will see that Hillary is the best candidate.

CHARLIE Toon   January 21st, 2008 2:52 pm ET

HILLARY will clean up the mess BUSH has made.YOU GO HILLARY!!!!!! OBAMA NO WAY???

Sig, Los Angeles CA   January 21st, 2008 2:52 pm ET

Another thing, why is Hillary relying so much on her husband to pull the dirty tricks? Why is she relying on Bill to take Obama on directly but she doesn't? I mean, I thought she was the Clinton running for president! As a woman, I find it highly unusally for this so-called 'strong feminist' woman needs her husband to fight her battles.

Chris   January 21st, 2008 2:52 pm ET

So what? Bill Clinton is campaigning for his wife, and Michelle Obama is campaigning for her husband. And I recall she's said some pretty inflamatory things herself. Obama's playing the victim. Whiny, whiny. Is he going to whine like this about North Korea and Iran?

George S   January 21st, 2008 2:52 pm ET

Obama and his handlers, need to stop thier whinning and childish snivels.
When they win it's all strut time. Big Show!. When they lose it's nothing but excuse time, Bill's fault, my dog's fault, whatever. They claim victory when in fact they lost.
Goodness gracious, what would happen if these evil Dictators and the world's evil leaders people ever start to dig there claws into the backbone of Obama.
We, the world, will be in some major deep trouble
Yes we do need a reality check, and very soon .
Especially after George Bush's big messup.

Mike, Chicago IL   January 21st, 2008 2:52 pm ET

Samuel,

Are that ignorant of the world??

This questions is for those who support hillary clinton.
1.Why do you think the senators who have been in senate for long time endores barrak obama particularly red state because they know barrak is the only candidate who can bring the country together and who can beat the republican for the general election.the polls also shows the same thing.
2. Why do you think college educated and intellectual people support and vote for barrak obama but non-college educated support hillary clinton.why ? who is honest in this historical race.

1. First explain to me in detail which senators who have been in the senate for a long time are supporting which candidate. Then I can possibly respond. I don't care to do your homework for you...

2. Very strange. I am college educated, have a masters degree in fact, and I am voting for Hillary. In the end your arguments really make no sense? What would that have anything to do with honesty? So are you saying uneducated folks are dishonest? I would probably suggest there is emperical evidence to the contrary.

Please read your posts, you sound very silly

Anonymous   January 21st, 2008 2:51 pm ET

Bill Clinton isn't just a spouse campaigning on Senator Clinton's behalf. He is a former President and should be held to higher standards given his political influence. Obama is right to defend himself against Mr. Clinton's loose tirades that misrepresent Obama's character. The Clintons DO have the good cop, bad cop thing going on ever since Senator Clinton shed some tears in New Hampshire. We need someone like Obama who will unite the country instead of dividers like the Clinton who carry so much political baggage. I'm sure republicans everywhere are secretly cheering on Hillary Clinton by not saying anything at all so that one of their candidates has a chance to win.

Minnesota voter   January 21st, 2008 2:51 pm ET

Obama is not complaining people... he is just saying it is time for him to start defending himself against Bill Clinton's words. All this time he refused to play the dirty politics the Clintons play. Who said he is whining? who said he is complaining? i can't believe how many of us are actually so used to old dirty tricks of politics and when we see them we actually encourage it. Then we have the nerve to scream we want a change in the white house!!!!! ok go figure. wake up everyone!

mike, il   January 21st, 2008 2:51 pm ET

Anybody think that Bill is hurting his legacy and history as a sort of payback to Hilary? They are not a religious people, why if Hilary is so strong by herself did she stay with him after all the cheating? Was Bill her ace in the hole that she could send out there like watch dogs to attack, while she sits back? I'm just saying why doesn't Hilary tell her husband to calm down, she can stand up for herself, is she hoping Bill will be able to get her out of any jam in the office??

Lydia   January 21st, 2008 2:51 pm ET

David B. Let's be real and honest for a minute. Oprah went to three rallies. She said nothing prior to the rallies and nothing since. To intimate she has been on the campaign trail for Obama is false and the type of half-truths the Clinton campaign has stooped to.

Pith   January 21st, 2008 2:50 pm ET

Whatever little respect I had for Bill and Hillary I have lost it now. This woman cries on national television asking why people dont like her and cries saying its really 'hard' running for presidency and the hillary supporters are accusing Barack Obama of "whining", its amazing. I am a democrat but if Hillary wins I will make it a point to vote for a republican. This woman and her husband are becomming more toxic each passing day.

PATTY   January 21st, 2008 2:50 pm ET

WELL SAID Summerville

AJ, IL   January 21st, 2008 2:50 pm ET

The aggressive engagement of Bill Clinton is hurting the Democratic Party, especially in the general election. But Bill and Hillary Clinton think they are the Democratic Party. Instead of Bill Clinton being the one person able to give us better insight into Hillary's personality and character and the specifics of her role in his Administration, he chooses to lash out at Obama and lie and distort Obama's stances and statements. Bill Clinton is a former president of the US. When he makes accusations, the average American will think "HEY THIS GUY WAS A FORMER PRESIDENT, HE MUST BE TELLING THE TRUTH?" Even though, Bill Clinton has made it a habit of lying or distorting the truth recently and in the past.

Independent and strong women should be outraged that as much as Hillary has been disrespected by Bill Clinton in the past, she still can even control him to this day even though it is her campaign for presidency and not his. For me this shows weakness even more so than Hillary's teary moment in New Hampshire.

Obama in '08!

michael dallas, tx   January 21st, 2008 2:48 pm ET

it's the new world order elite government vs obama

but then again obama wants to BAN all semi-auto handguns

so i guess no matter what, America will lose unless Ron Paul gets elected :)

lisa   January 21st, 2008 2:48 pm ET

It is clear to me that CNN favors Barack Hussien Obama. They seem to print stories that favor him and show the Clintons in an unfavorable light. Try being a little more impartial and fair to all the candidates. The media is trying to pick the next candidiate, instead of the people.

Sig, Los Angeles CA   January 21st, 2008 2:48 pm ET

IF Hillary wins the nomination, I cannot wait until it backfires on her supporters. Bill Clinton had the nerve to say we were rolling the dice with Obama considering half of the country have already stated that they will not vote for Hillary under any circumstances. What on earth makes them, and their supports, think they can win the general election? Bill Clinton only won because of the third-party factor, in '92 and '96. One thing is for sure, the black vote will not be taken for granted. I guarantee the turnout will be low among blacks than usual; Hillary has turned off the general community. She can keep the old guard, but those of us who are educated and among the higher income bracket will not support her.

Good luck in the general – McCain is going to win it!

John S   January 21st, 2008 2:47 pm ET

Those of you who are supporting Clinton thinking that she will be able to win November election are living in a fairy tale. Only thing that will unite the republicans and independents is Hillary Clinton. They just want Hillary to win because then a republican win will be guaranteed in November. So if that's what the democrats want then they will get it.

angela franklin   January 21st, 2008 2:47 pm ET

Obama seems childish – a real whiner. Not up to the difficult job of standing up to Republican jabs or international criticism. Too thin skinned. He and his wife and staff have been brutally critical of Hillary. I also don't like Obama's disrespectful treatment of democratic former Presidents and his honoring Reagan, the Republican. The dmeocratic party does not reminisce fondly about Reagan. Obama keeps making this really off base statements – and then wants to win because of his black heritage. He's starting to really stink.

lyn- uk   January 21st, 2008 2:46 pm ET

while the rest of the world is selling off shares amidst fears of a major recession in the USA, you guys dont even have the sense to back someone with the necessary experience to get you out of it – how can you honestly think Obama will know how to make the right decisions? When Bill was president you had a wonderful booming economy – think with your heads and not always your hearts and choose Hillary – and stop whining about black votes, female votes and think logically. Hillary 2008!

Daniel, NY, NY   January 21st, 2008 2:45 pm ET

If Obama can not handle comments from 2 fellow democrats, imagine how this inexperienced politician will fare with World Leaders.

Let's not have a democratic version of the inept George W.

Michael   January 21st, 2008 2:45 pm ET

This whole race/gender thing sickens me. I am an African American male. I get sick and tired of these news stories entitled, "American ready for a black president" and "Black women are torn between their race and gender." Stories like this fuels both racism and sexism in this country and assumes that black women are only voting based on race and sex. What about white women? Are they torn between John Edwards and Hillary Clinton as well? You dont hear this type of story. What about Latino women? When Richardson was in, were they torn between Richardson and Clinton? Or what if the main candidates were all white? Would black women be torn as well? I just get sick and tired of these race/sex stories. It fuels racism to the highest extent. If the media is going to report something, let it be strictly issues of politics and not along racial/sesist lines!

Another Steve   January 21st, 2008 2:45 pm ET

Considering that all of us know this, I'm surprised it took so long for the Obama campaign to acknoledge the good cop, bad cop routine that is being played by the Clintons. They will not stop at anything to get the nomination. Yes, we know Obama is trying to change for a more positive campaign. I'm glad to see Obama bring this matter up before the debate tonight. It's about time to show these arrogant Clintons some good old Chicago politics my friend.

joe   January 21st, 2008 2:44 pm ET

I have not heard a single intelligent argument for why Hillary would make good president. I have heard why Bill was a good president (which is questionable to say the least). We all know she doesn't have 35 years of experience. She has 25 years experience being a wife and lawyer, and 10 years at most of true experience. Once again she is relying on Bill's experience and passing it off as her own.

If that is how we play the game. Then give her the experience for learning from the best on how to lie to the government and american people in a top notch fashion. I don't know how anyone could even consider putting the CLintons back in office. The rest of the world will continue to disrespect us becuase we don't seem to learn from any of our mistakes.

Obama may not have a squeeky clean resume, but who does. Quite honestly a little dirt makes you stronger, but Hillary is so covered in filth that we spend more time questioning if she is being genuine or fake that no change could possibly occur. Wake up people!!!

Rod   January 21st, 2008 2:44 pm ET

It would be a national scandal if Bill did not support his wife's candidacy. I am happy to see him on the trail.

Obama is the KING of generalities. What exactly did Bill Clinton (or Hillary) say that was not factual????? Obama started off promising change, and as promise he has changed.... the DEMOCRATS ARE DIVIDED BECAUSE OBAMA AND HIS SUPPORTERS PLAYED THE RACE CARD TO CHIP AWAY AT CLINTON'S SUPPORT IN THE BLACK COMMUNITY. His play worked but at the cost of his white supporters who saw his whining as phony... there was no racial overtone to any of those Clinton comments.

A Fair Media Is No Where To Be Found.

Imagine if Hillary's only message was vote for me because I'm white... this nation would be outraged. Obama promise vaguely "Change." (what change is this.... "I'm a black man and we've not had one yet."

Think About Change   January 21st, 2008 2:44 pm ET

The world watched as our country fell victim to Bill's moral demise - as a husband, as a father, as a United States President. Some claim that the 2-for-1 Clinton deal is a good thing. Imagine for one moment the headlines...because it would never be Hillary's name publicized. Instead, her husband will land the front pages and Americans will pay the price for continuing to choose leaders whose actions do not convey a message of unity. Bill lied to his family, and he lied to the American people. He would have been just fine with all the lying had our system of checks-and-balances failed. In our current times of world conflict and diminished respect towards America, can we afford to place both Clintons on the ballot? People around the world are watching. It is amazing to see how there is a shift in focus from anti-Americanism to anti-Bush. This is evidence that the other countries may be willing to open doors for peaceful compromise if we choose a leader worthy of such a delicate process in the 21st century. Of the three democratic candidates, we must ask ourselves - which person will be able to envigor an economic upsurge in our own country? Which person will appeal to the hard-working, over-taxed middle class? Which person will inspire us to take a long, hard look at the future of our children - our nation's future (e.g. child healthcare and free, public education) - in such a way as to reunite private and public sector support for teaching and learning? Which person will be invited to a foreign country for "talks" without reservation? Which person will unite Americans on a variety of levels? Democrats must not split on the movement, but we must be very cautious of the dire implications that placing Hillary in office will have. Can we afford to take on her baggage? Would you ever ask others to take on yours? Come on, Dems...let's get this one right - for youself, for your families, for your country, for the impact your choice has on the world. True change...vote for that...

Leah DiMarco, TX   January 21st, 2008 2:43 pm ET

I think Bill should keep on talking.

The more Bill talks the more it turns off everyone from voting for Hillary! And the more Bill talks it shows America the type of divisiveness that another term for ' the Billary team' would bring to the White House.

Goooo Oooobama '08

Darold   January 21st, 2008 2:42 pm ET

The Clintons dissapoint me.

Caliman   January 21st, 2008 2:42 pm ET

Barack Hussein Obama has to realize that he's attacking not just the record of Mrs. Clinton, but also that of President Bill Clinton. Naturally, Hillary and Bill have to defend their records against his attacks. The problem with Obama is he can diss it, but he can't take it. Grow up!

Don   January 21st, 2008 2:41 pm ET

The Clinton's are not playing dirty politics. Obama needs to calm down because he is now not showing he is the canidate of change. He has slung plenty of mud himself. Obama has a gift of throwing puches under the radar. This is politics and he is playing the game just like everyone else. He and Edwards were out attacking Hillary way before the Clinton's even talked about Obama. Obama was on the news talking about how he had to go after Hillary. When Hillary fought back, everyone got up in arms. I do not blame Bill and Hillary for defending their record. Its very unfair for the media and the public to act as if Obama is some messaih come to our salvation. He is a politician and if you look close he is really no differant from those who claim he can change. People need to look past this retoric and look at the issues.Obama and Clinton are very similar in their views and plans, but Clinton has the better policy book and the experiance to get the job done. I saw Obama speak this morning and I was cheering, he can speak. I also saw Hillary and Edwards. The differance, Hillary not only was passionate, but you knew she knows how to get the job done. Hillary will be the best President this country has had. Give her a chance, listen to what her plans are. I know we will look back and be grateful that this women is the leader of the free world. I also have no doubt that Obama will also be one of the great Presidents of our time.

RIGHT ON HILLARY GO FOR IT   January 21st, 2008 2:41 pm ET

ITS ABOUT TIME WE PUT ANOTHER THRU AMERICAN IN THE WHITE HOUSE. THEY ARE COMMENTING ABOUT MR.BILL CLINTON. BUT AS JESUS SAID "LET HE THAT IS WITHOUT SIN CAST THE FIRST STONE"

JOSE AND MYRA LOO

Brad K   January 21st, 2008 2:40 pm ET

Excuse me, who's running for President, anyway, Bill or Hillary? If it's Bill, that's unconstitutional. If it's Hillary, where does she get off claiming credit ("experience') for Bill's presidency-or his terms as governor and Arkansas attorney general, for that matter? She's held elective office for 7 years, less than Obama's 11.

Now Bill's out on the campaign trail trying to confuse the issue and make this election a referendum on his presidency, thinking that will redound to Hillary's benefit. Well, if that's the campaign they want, let's have at it. There may be some Clinton nostalgia in certain quarters after 8 years of G.W. Bush, but there's also a lot of Clinton fatigue. Many of us remember the bitter divisions, the constant dissembling, the "small ball" politics of poll-driven triangulation. Bill diminished the presidency by failing to give the nation a vision, by failing to keep his pants on, by feeding us a steady diet of evasions and bald-faced lies, including a whopper that got him disbarred. Now he feels entitled to go about spreading distortions and naked untruths about Barack Obama, and Billary fans indignantly accuse Obama of "going negative" or "whining" when he steps up to set the record straight. It's a shameful but all too familiar pattern. Twenty years of Bushes and Clintons are enough. Let's move on to something better.

J.R.   January 21st, 2008 2:40 pm ET

Gee – Senator Obama thinks it's tough dealing with two Clintons – you can assume they're his friends compared to what he'd have to deal with if he ever became president. They're picking on me!

All For a Clinton Dynasty   January 21st, 2008 2:40 pm ET

The Obama team have only now figured out the "good cop, bad cop" routine; no wonder they are so poor on the counterpunch. They should stop whining about Bill because the GOP will be much worse on him (if he makes it to the general election), and no issues will be "off" the table.

Tate BLT   January 21st, 2008 2:40 pm ET

Who is running for president? Hillary or Bill. Somedays it sounds like Bill is running for his third term. Hillary's much reliance on Bill sends out this perception that Hillary can't win this race without Bill. May be she can't.

common_sense   January 21st, 2008 2:39 pm ET

The reason why no one is taking note of Michelle Obama's campaign behavior... she's not Bill Clinton.

Susann   January 21st, 2008 2:39 pm ET

It's obvious that the Clintons under estimated the power of Obama. Hillary and Bill are showing an underlining intimidation. When a person has no other ammunition against someone they see as a threat then more often than not they result to lies and exaggerations. Sadly, this is the tactic that the Clintons are using. I spent years having the utmost respect for Bill Clinton, because he was an awesome President and he took us out of a deficit, but these elections has showed his true character which has weakened my respect for him. Hillary is too emotional and has too much attitude to be President of a country that's heading towards turmoil. Her comebacks and responses are too redundant to rely on. Obama is what we need. He can handle it if America will give him a chance. Rock the Vote for BARACK OBAMA!

christy   January 21st, 2008 2:39 pm ET

I think this country should wake up and see what is happening. First we had two Bushes, and now we are threatened with the possibility of two Clintons. The word for this in the English dictionary is Nepotism. Do we really want this in a "democratic" country? We really need real change, and it for sure wont be with Hilary and Bill Clinton

Bonnie   January 21st, 2008 2:39 pm ET

#1. Never before has there been a former first lady running for President, therefore, how can we say it is unbecoming for a former President to campaign for his wife? NEVER HAPPENED BEFORE!
#2. Research what Obama has said before accusing the Clintons of distorting the truth. There is documentation that Obama has said what the Clinton campaign claims!
#3. Michelle Obama gets a pass for her racist comments."There ain't no blacks in Iowa."
#4. How come Obama's speech at the MLK march today was given much air time as well as Edwards and NO WHERE IS HILLARY'S? Very one sided if you ask me.
#5. It seems the media feels Obama will make bigger headlines.
#6. Obama claims to want to unite everyone and yet he's the one that continually says divisive statements. Listen to his Sunday "sermon" in Georgia in church.
#7. Obama wrote about his drug use and talked about it on many talk shows but when anyone else brings it up suddenly it becomes a racist comment. I really don't see how that is racist.
#8. I agree with the person above who acknowledged that Obama can bring out
Oprah but Hillary can't have Bill speak for her because he was a former President. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
We'll probably see Oprah again. It was only after Oprah that people really started taking notice of him.
#9. Lets see, the Clinton campaign can't make people aware of his voting record, his experience,the color of his skin even though he does, his drug use,everything and anything else. Hum, thats what we should do, vote for another person like G.W. !

Murry   January 21st, 2008 2:38 pm ET

This Billary front is unsettling. Who's running for president again? Hillary needs to be able to stand up and pull punches instead of letting her husband do the heavy work.
Vote for Obama. He's fair, he's honest and he has the better spouse.

Jim   January 21st, 2008 2:38 pm ET

Although I do not plan to vote for either, I did vote for "the" President Clinton both times. I did not believe the Bush;s even back then. That said, I now have a much narrower vision of President Clinton as he realy should shut up. Who will be the Presidnt if she would win? I am a husband who would support his wife but he is NOT acting in aso-called husbandly role. Yeh, I am a Republican or should I say Independent ??

Big Ed   January 21st, 2008 2:38 pm ET

Look, for as much as one might like the guy, Obama can't win the general election. Too much baggage. Too much of a quantum leap for the good old USA. Hillary may be a woman , but she's the right color, religion, and has the aristocracy of the Democtratic party on her side. It takes like a BILLION DOLLARS to win the Presidency back from the Right.

Want 8 more years of tax-breaks for the super rich? No health insurance for America's kids? THAT is what a vote for Obama will get you in the end.

Wake up, Democrats, and UNITE behind the candidate who can will, and who will win. Love you, HIllary!

stacy   January 21st, 2008 2:37 pm ET

Bill and Hillary Clinton could well be compared to Franklin D. and Eleanor Roosevelt, love them or hate them, are career politicians, they do get the job done, again whether or not you love them or hate them, and they do attack the job at hand with much dedication, passion and gusto.

come on now   January 21st, 2008 2:37 pm ET

the clintons have little class
and the general feeling that people seem to be expressing, that
"bill is an ex president so he knows what he's talking about"
is pretty nuts.

you think people are gonna say the same thing about bush?
doubt it.

Laura   January 21st, 2008 2:37 pm ET

I just have one thing to say to all of those folks who are accusing Obama of whining...remember about 2 weeks ago when Bill was complaining people were picking on his wife. Grow up Bill... Then she cried in New Hampshire when talking about how much she wanted to do for the country...PLEEEESE. I couldn't believe it. That was an Oscar winning performance. It made me almost barf. I am a former Hillary supporter...thank goodness I woke up and see her for what she really is..and it isn't good. She needs to be kept far away from the White House..I know that now. I just wish Edwards would drop out and support Obama....that would help him stop Hillary and Bill..No 3rd term for Bill. Enough already.

Frank   January 21st, 2008 2:36 pm ET

Grow up Obama, I mean if you can't take Clinton's criticisms can you really handle the true mud slinging of the Republicans. And He didn't distort his record....there isnt enough of it to distort. I mean its not a voluminous record to begin with and what you do have is very little in the way of bills, proposals and initiatives and not a very good track record on voting either.

dori   January 21st, 2008 2:36 pm ET

I smoked but I did not inhale. I did not have sexual relations with that women. Nothing that comes out of either Clinton's mouth is the truth. They let thier friends and coleagues go to jail while they sat in the big house, then pardoned some for thier loyalty. Bill Clinton was one of only two presidents to be impeached. How can anyone want this type of person and his stand by your man, insult to all women wife, in the oval office ever again. I'm a republican and have changed my registration to democrat just to vote against her in our state. No more Slick Willy or his loud mouth philly.

Thomas, Orlando, FL   January 21st, 2008 2:36 pm ET

It's sad to see Bill Clinton getting in the mud fight like he is, cause I really respect the guy. Granted I like it a lot more when he's yelling at FIX news for distorting facts rather than yelling at – essentially – me for supporting someone in our democratic country besides his wife. But I do respect the guy and it saddens me how ugly this is making him look. People don't usually remember the good things, just the slop. Ask somebody about Michael Jackson today and they're not going to start by naming hit singles. This whole style is so transparent, it takes the mystique out of the leader of what was really a good era.

It's just politics as usual, but there's a few moments in every primary season where I get really inspired and think maybe this time it won't be like that.

But it always is.

Jenny   January 21st, 2008 2:35 pm ET

Hillary was so out of line with her MLK comments and Bill Clinton is just going way to far.

Right now, I will not vote for Clinton. I will vote Republican or for Bloomberg. That is the level of damage the Clinton's are doing. They need to STOP!!!

Rod   January 21st, 2008 2:34 pm ET

The truth is not an attack. It is truth. Obama voted to fund the Iraq war each chance he got. Where's the Clinton lie??

Obama admitted to drug use. It is truth. Where is the Clinton lie??

Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act into law. It is truth. Where is the Cinton lie?

Supporters were reporting that they were being strong armed by their union leadership to support Obama. Where is the Clinton lie??

Obama has proven that he is willing to do anything and say anything to get into that office, even dividing his party with phony outrage about clearly non-racial comments. Obama and his wife played the race card and it's going to back-fire.

You may not like Clinton and her husband.... but they didn't lie.

If the adoring media keeps it up... maybe Obama won't have to answer the tough questions, and the policy questions.

adrienne   January 21st, 2008 2:34 pm ET

As a woman, I am appalled that Hillary's campaign strategy involves using her husband to do her dirty work. As a feminist, I find this strategy rather repugnant. Why stoop to this level when she should be running on her own merits?

GOBAMA!

Bill V.   January 21st, 2008 2:34 pm ET

This is a good strategy for Hillary. Throw Bill at Obama. That way he can't get a good shot at her. Also it shows him as a whiner (which he is). Obama takes the bait and runs against Bill Clinton. This also shows him to be a crisis manager and more of tactician (which is all he appears to be...change, change, change and no strategy to show for it).

The Clintons aren't stupid.

Anonymous   January 21st, 2008 2:34 pm ET

I find hilarious that you people complain about his whining, yet you Hillary supporters WHINED when she took heat because she was a woman, even though that had nothing to do with it.

He makes a severely vital point – Hillary in 2008 simply means Bill has the White House again. She can't control what he says on the campaign trail, so how does she control him in the White House?

If you are a Hillary supporter saying, "Get out of the Kitchen", you're obviously scared. Find another reason why Hillary should be president besides experience, which she has less than Obama.

Denise   January 21st, 2008 2:33 pm ET

Why is stating the obvious being labeled as whinning? Is it true that Bill and Hillary are misquoting him? This campaign should be a debate between Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and John Edwards. Of course, the networks are giving Bill press coverage which he doesn't deserve. Which rightfully belongs to John Edwards - he's been projected as the third wheel in this entire process. The day of the New Hampshire primary, Bill's 'fairy tale' video was on the cnn homepage all day. During the day of the Nevada caucus, Hillary's interview with Tyra Banks; Obama making progress among blacks; and John Edwards stating he would never mention, as Barack did, Ronald Reagan in his speeches were posted on the home pages of news networks. You make the call?

chelle   January 21st, 2008 2:33 pm ET

The difference between Michelle Obama stumping and Bill Clinton stumping is phenomenal. If you can't see that, you have no clue about politics. One is a spouse proclaiming her support for her husband, the other is a former world leader who's words carry with them a huge amount of credibility. He is no ordinary supporter or spouse, don't be ludicrous. As for comparing Oprah to Bill – ummmmmm she isn't all over the country for him. She came out in support of him, showed up in Iowa, went home.

BTW, how does a newspaper keep impartiality when they endorse a candidate?

jneill@nc.rr.com   January 21st, 2008 2:33 pm ET

He lied to America when he was President... "it depends on what "is" means". I am not the least bit surprised.

Democrat in PA   January 21st, 2008 2:33 pm ET

Billary doesn't belong in politics. Obama clearly has to fight two people at once! Hillary obviously can't run her campaign without Bill's bad cop role. Is that what she will do in the white house? Go run in get Bill when something goes wrong? Keep in mind, because he's a former president, he'll have access to all intelligence documents that the president would have. This would be the "Billary" presidency. Isn't America fatigued yet with the possibility of 28 years of dynasty rule by the Bush-Clintons families? Wake up America!! Arent you tired of them yet? Go Obama Go!!

Trisha   January 21st, 2008 2:33 pm ET

Boo Hoo!

Elliott   January 21st, 2008 2:32 pm ET

It's really interesting when Clinton supporters say Barack Obama is whinning. Let's see, when John Edwards went against Hillary Clinton in the NH debate it was called 'a pile on', yes? But now, Obama wants to call Mr. Bill on mis-statements in regard to his record and it's whinning.

Senator Obama is a great man and would be a great President. The problem is Americans don't read enough. How many people actually look into the candidates records? If you don't do this, then shame on you. It's your responsibility.

Barack Obama has admitted his mistakes, spoke truthfully about his drug use as a younger man and continues to try and work with the republican party.

Hillary Clinton wants credit for everything that went well during the Clinton administration, but accepts no knowledge or responsibility for anything bad. I watched her interview on Meet the Press. Are you telling me she had NO idea that her brothers and her husband where talking about who to grant a pardon to? Are you telling me that she had NO idea who donated to her campaign? What a bunch of crap. But hey, Americans must love their crap because they can't get enough of the Clintons.

I am a 31 year old man with three wonderful kids. Since I have been 4 years old, we have had the same families in the white house either as President or Vice President. Think about that for a while. The same families in office for the last 27 years. We need a change.

frosty   January 21st, 2008 2:32 pm ET

Obama has had Oprah talking it up on the campaign trail. She's the most influential woman in America, possibly the world. It would seem that having an ex president would level the playing field, not constitute an unfair advantage. Obama is just being a sore loser.

Cathy   January 21st, 2008 2:31 pm ET

I disagree with the comments from people saying if Obama can't stand up to the Clinton machine, he won't be able to handle the Republicans. This is a much different situation. Bill Clinton is a beloved (by some, not me) figure in the Democratic party. To go after him is tricky. I think what Obama has accomplished is nothing short of miraculous given the strength of the Clinton machine. If anyone thinks that the Clinton's haven't been priming the pump for her run since 2000, they are deluding themselves. The thought of Bill being back in the White House is scary.

ray {from Ontario}   January 21st, 2008 2:30 pm ET

I think it's ridiculous to compare a few appearances in 1 state by Oprah & the little bit of campaigning by Michelle to the heavyweight that is Bill Clinton. Not everyone watches Oprah & very few people know anything about Barrack's wife. Sen. Obama already has a very high mountain to climb without 2 very high ranking and popular stars in the party pulling him down. We all know that Pres. Clinton will campaign hard for his wife but he should do it with a little more integrity.

Samantha   January 21st, 2008 2:29 pm ET

Oh poor cute spineless Obama...what will he do now. Please people, let us make a big noise and make sure Bill Clinton will not support his wife and the woman (Hillary) is harassed and trashed so that she doesn't compete or cannot win in any primary. Poor Obama needs to win, he needs all your support. Think about it, how dare Bill Clinton support his wife when she is attacked unethically by Obama. Bill should not support her, instead make life miserable more by joining the poor man.

Samuel D   January 21st, 2008 2:28 pm ET

No way H Clinton is not fit to serve the country in any capacity. President Washington did not continue to serve when the people wanted him to. Why should the Clintons?

Should the Clintons end up in office; we will deserve what we get for not putting new leadership in the Whitehuse.

Gringo inPeru   January 21st, 2008 2:28 pm ET

waa waa waa dont want to loose obama just admit Clinton is more qualified then you are I have never heard of you. Who are you? I have heard of clinton I have heard of Mcain I have heard of John edwards I have heard of Rudy you may be a senator for what state and how long? what did you do before that? this presidentual race is the most dysfunctional one Ihave ever seen. You Blame Clinton for having her husbands help maybe you could ask your wife to get out and help you instead of crying be a man we need a man or a woman that will lead us not cry and say he said she said them are childrens games

gigi   January 21st, 2008 2:28 pm ET

Obama is not whining he needs to re-educate the poor ignorant people who actually think the Clinton's know how to speak the truth. When credibility, instead of fame or fortune, is all you have you need to fight for it. It's sad people can't recognize that.

Hillary also says Bill wil not be highly involved in her decision making if she is elected. Judging by the way he is running her campaign, I don't believe it. Anyone else?

Mikki   January 21st, 2008 2:28 pm ET

Just the thought of the Clintons for another eight years sends a shiver down my spine. Come on Dems....Edwards, Obama, Kerry or Kennedy. Anybody but the Clintons.

basil   January 21st, 2008 2:28 pm ET

When Nevada’s results were tallied, Obama made a terse statement barely acknowledging his defeat to Senator Clinton. His gracelessness wasn’t mentioned in any of the Big Media shows. Nor did they grant much coverage to allegations that Obama’s campaign intimidated casino caucus-goers and ran ads on Spanish radio stations declaring Hilary Clinton was against the Latino people.

Now we have Obama’s latest public pout. Bill is picking on him. Give me a break.

What about Obama’s nasty barbed response that he should have answered Tim Russert’s debate question about his biggest weakness with a quip about how he had an overwhelming urge to ‘help little old ladies across the street,’ a remark that was not only misogynistic, but ageist, and clearly directed at Mrs. Clinton?.

Yet Obama brings up racism on a regular basis and then blames the other candidates or, worse, the other candidate’s spouses.

Oh please

During Cnn's biased pseudo-primary coverage, the full text of Romney's speech in Florida, after his victory speech in Nevada, was broadcast while Clinton's victory speech received 30 second coverage, at best.

Even Rudy Guiliani was interviewed on CNN, but no sign of HRC.

I wonder what CNN's coverage would have been had Obama been the winner.

Talk about bias, or is it propaganda?

enomisa   January 21st, 2008 2:28 pm ET

Obama of the beautiful talk is and will cry foul if he doesn't get the advantage. SORE LOSER.

Juanita Ward   January 21st, 2008 2:28 pm ET

You know, it is very funny to me, that people would listen to anything, that Bill
Clinton, would have too say. For him to get on the stand and lie and say "I never
had sexual relationships, with that woman." And all the lies, he must have told
his wife, He lied to us then, and he is lying now.

For someone that have said he love the blacks, so well, has a very funny way
of showing it. why get up before the country and lie, just to get your wife into office,
is it that you want to see, if she will have an interm under the desk?

There was a time that I felt good about Hillary, but as I watched her on, National
television, sit there and lie and wrinkle her face, what the hell is all of that about??
I'm hoping people will wake up, Once a liar always, a liar . Bill Clinton has always
lied, now he is going out of his way to ruin a man's reputation.

Obama, has made reference to Reagan, but he is not Reagan, and do not want to be him. People had better wake up, we see what Bush has done, and I spoke of it to the Nacogdoches Daily news paper, in 93 and 94 why don't you check it out
everything that I said, would happen is happening. Do we want another war, or do we want change?

joe   January 21st, 2008 2:27 pm ET

If he can't handle the 2 Clintons how would he be able to take on the whole Republican Party if he wins the nomination?

If he can't handle the heat now, how will he be able to handle it if he was president when Putin, Chavez and the rest of them gang up on him?

Send the rookie back to the minors for 8 more years of training.

nyc   January 21st, 2008 2:27 pm ET

Obama seems to be complaining about everything the Clinton's do.
If he can't take the heat of the caucuses how will be be as President?
Let's talk facts, Obama has shown mixed messages on the War...voted
against it, but sent money. Where is Clinton's distortion of those facts there?

Every canditate has their partner campaigning for them, why can't Hillary?
She's married to a former President, who is a recognized genius and
she would be a fool not to use him. We all know, she is no fool.

Look what happened to Al Gore, he didn't use Clinton and he lost the election!

Dee NY   January 21st, 2008 2:26 pm ET

Obama you are fighting two...the Clintons are only after their own agendas.
She wants to be the first women President... and will do anything to bring you down.
Even if it means using the black vote for her gain. That’s all it is... Gain.

I voted before for slick Willy "Bill" but never again. His wife is nothing but
A gold digger on his resume... carry over!

Time has come for a new future and experience! Obama I hope you win
The confidence of the USA. I am a proud Latina ..voting... for Obama!

wiggle   January 21st, 2008 2:26 pm ET

If you support Hillary and you are a man then you have been castrated.

Stephanie   January 21st, 2008 2:26 pm ET

ok..so Obama praised Reagan..so what. Do only the Democracts have all the great leaders and good ideas..I think not. It shows Obama has the ability to look past party lines and recognize good leaders or great ideas when he sees them. Hillary Clinton on the other hand has a narrow focus. She even marginalized Dr. King's accomplishments. I don't think she is a real friend to the Civil Rights movement. Plus I don't think she would have accomplished a thing without her husband..how sad is that.

I would have had a lot more respect for her if after she left the White House she would have divorced the "player." Sounds really co-dependent to me. Plus I think the country has had enough of the Hill and Bill show..we don't want an encore performance. They are both morally bankrupt. Obama is the best choice. Hillary is rather pathetic..don't you think.

Khwaty   January 21st, 2008 2:26 pm ET

Bill Clinton was not disbarred, his license was suspended for five years. A lot of you can't get your facts right.

Jose'   January 21st, 2008 2:25 pm ET

Obama just isn't experienced enough to know he's just a liberal tool of the democratic party. Hillary atleast admits it, but she would destroy this country.

America deserves better than either one of these people.

Romney '08

New Yorker, NYC, NY   January 21st, 2008 2:25 pm ET

My Prediction ,

Hillary Rodham Clinton – MN,RI,CT,MA, NY, NJ, CA, OR,WA,CO, MD (North East and West Coast),
Barrack Hussein OBama = IL,VT,

Antonio   January 21st, 2008 2:25 pm ET

boy, if he's like this now. Let's see how he reacts when the Republicans go after him.

California Girl   January 21st, 2008 2:25 pm ET

How long will Obama be able to pretend that he really represents change? What has he done in his political career so far that makes people think he will be more independent of the political establishment than any other candidate? Skip controversial votes during his tenure representing Illinois? Complain that Bill and Hillary are "ganging up" on him? The Clintons are good at politics. I LIKE that; maybe they can beat the Republican candidate in November. And they have not avoided difficult or divisive issues. Hillary's health plan is more comprehensive than Obama's, and still he claims the mantle of change? I am confident that Hillary Clinton can take on and beat the Republicans in November, and can deal with the country's major and difficult issues after she is elected. Bill may need to watch his temper, but for me, having her competence and his experience in the White House is a comforting thought. (BTW, I don't work for the Clinton campaign, I just like Hillary). Go girl!

Aizanthor   January 21st, 2008 2:25 pm ET

People will support who they support. The bottom line is that accusing Obama of "whining" is indicative of the kind of campaign the Clintons are running against him. Attacking him on the basis of his complaining about Bill Clinton's behavior is as childish as Bill's campaign methods as of late. And please don't compare Oprah to Bill Clinton. I don't even need to point out the absurdity there. Obama has ignited excitement across America and if every young voter were to go out and vote, Hillary would not win the nomination. This is an election about the future, and while "seasoned" Democrats may be weary of Obama's presence in Washington, they should set aside their love for the Clintons and think about moving ahead instead trudging through a stagnant political atmosphere (i.e. Bush, Clinton, Bush, Clinton). Both Clintons should cool their jets.

LQ ROCHESTER MN   January 21st, 2008 2:24 pm ET

I realize that Obama has Oprah campaigning for him, altho' I haven't heard anything at all from her lately but i never watch her show anyway.

What bothers me so much about this is that Bill is an ex-President. I understand that he is going to support his wife but as someone who is still addressed as Mr. President I just don't think he should be saying anything about any of the other Democrat contenders. Let him tear the repubs apart if he wants, let him talk about how Hill is the best candidate, but don't compare with the other Democratic candidates.

It DOES sound like good cop bad cop – I said that days ago as Hillary is finder her "softer" side and Bill is just mouthing off more and more. The more I see, the more I hear, the less I liker her and now the less I like HIM. I WILL vote for her if she is the nominee in Nov, but I will not be caucusing for her on super Tuesday.

Lee   January 21st, 2008 2:24 pm ET

Samantha Klein – you hit the nail squarely on the head. If he can't stand up to the Clintons, who can he stand up to?

Ron   January 21st, 2008 2:23 pm ET

I VOTED for Clinton and believe Bush is the worst president in modern history yet I would not vote for Hillary. Bill Clinton is not being truthful regarding Obama and Hillary is supporting Bill"s false and malicious statements.

molly gonz   January 21st, 2008 2:23 pm ET

Hillary or Bill Clinton never expected Obama to be this close. They are going to do whatever it takes to discredit him. All these people calling Obama a whiner or a wimp..you need a reality check. This is someone protecting his character. That shows what kind of person he is. He will not let anyone just say anything about him and discredit him. I love him for doing whatever it takes to show them he will not back down. Go Obama!! The chase gets closer and the gap narrows.

Boomer 4 Obama   January 21st, 2008 2:23 pm ET

I never understood the depth of the passion against the Clintons... until now.

I really, REALLY dread the possibility of a third term for The Clintons.

Tee   January 21st, 2008 2:23 pm ET

Bill Clinton not the only MAN on earth who has cheated on his wife. MLK was known to stray. Did that make him any less of a human being? NOT

Craig Carlsbad   January 21st, 2008 2:22 pm ET

To those who say

I thought Obama was running for president he should learn to play with the big boys . . .

I say

I thought Hillary was running for president so why does she have to have her big boy friend help her out. Is bill going to have to help her with national security. Hillary is running the most anti-feminist campaign in history.

She should pack hubby of to an island and say "I am doing this my way"
\

Independent Voter   January 21st, 2008 2:22 pm ET

People say that Obama whines and that Hillary cries on national TV. Who cares?! It is very difficult to focus on the issues that concern US – the American people – when those who supposedly want to represent US spend so much time creating a sense of utter havoc. Maybe that is the tactic; create so much dissonant churn that it devolves into a campaign of vile rhetoric and we, the American people, wont realize that the issues ,and the American spirit, somehow get lost in the scuffle. Obama gets people excited about the political process by appealing to their sense of responsibility as American citizens. Hillary unleashes Bill "I did not inhale" Clinton to deflate that euphoria. She stays "clean". Believe me I get it now. It's crystal clear. Fortunately I have woken up from my dream: It may turn out to be Hillary "Bill by Proxy" Clinton running as the Democratic "nominee". Long live the Queen! .... I will vote Republican in that case.

NJ Guy   January 21st, 2008 2:21 pm ET

Even Republicans agree that Bill Clinton's 8 yrs is one of the best in the American History. So, for Obama to bash at Bill is like digging his own grave!!!

Jason Smith   January 21st, 2008 2:21 pm ET

I don't see Oprah out there embarrassing Hillary for all her disgraceful tactics....she has too much class....Hillary has none....

Feminists should be outraged at Hillary's low-class tactics.....

George Schade   January 21st, 2008 2:20 pm ET

I have been a supporter and admirer of Bill Clinton, although never very taken by his wife and her calculating steps. Now, in his fervent campaign for Hillary, Mr. Clinton has crossed the line of demarcation between reasonable and unreasonable. He is demonstrating pure judgment. This is too bad for him and for people like me who hates to see idols falling from grace.
George Schade

Concerned   January 21st, 2008 2:20 pm ET

I have no respect left for the clintons as it is ,they have been jealous of
Obama from the start.....and its two against one mind you, now America
i ask you is that right ? No it is not................just like the vegas election
that state even had the nerve to correct the way a person with a southern
accent pronounced their words this is not an english class, i found that
very offending and the lady was "gracious" enough to correct her accent
i really don't think that person should have been put in that position........
Another thing could it be possible the clintons made a derogatory gesture
when using the word fairy? As years ago a gay person was called fairy
and Omaba supports that and clintons don't......who in their family can
"honestly "say no one was ever gay in their family ? People i feel that
a person should be able to choose whom and who they want to live
with...........America that is called choice of freedom ...........................
OBAMA has my vote !!! 100%

Back in awaiting moderation hell...   January 21st, 2008 2:20 pm ET

OH MY GOD...now Hillary and Bill are being compared to George Wallace??? Come on OBAMA LOVERS....get real!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Nothing like race bating....

Anonymous   January 21st, 2008 2:19 pm ET

It is about time the Obama campaign fights back. It appears to me that Senator Obama is campaigning against a dynamic duo. If Hillary wins the nomination and becomes president she will apparently depend on Bill to bail her out just as he has done on the trail. I for one am tired of it. Hillary needs to stand on her two feet as a strong and independent woman not a woman who continuously needs rescuing.

Jason Smith   January 21st, 2008 2:19 pm ET

I am voting for Obama....he is the "only" candidate for change...Hillary's gimmicks, race-baiting, tactics are disgusting......and slick willie has no business doing anything...HE IS IMPEACHED!!!! and he is not running for President!!!!!

All the Dems who have dropped out have endorsed Obama!!!

Can they all start campaigning for him??? Can Kerry start campaigning for him too!!!!

Can Edwards, after SC, start campaigning for him????/

Hillary is a shallow small-minded person with no substance and no credibility...she is very divisive....and will drive many independents to McCain....

Congrats, Dems!!!!

cara   January 21st, 2008 2:19 pm ET

I think it is shameful that all of these people are calling Obama a cry baby.. He is the only candidate who has vowed not to use "dirty politics" in his campaign...even after his advisers told him to time and time again. Sure he could fire back false statements sbout hillary...but he's a candidate who isn't going to do something like that just to be elected. He's an honest man, unlike Bill. And I am really tired of having people say that Hillary has more experience...being the first lady does not give Hillary more experience. That is B.S. And hillary does not stand for change. She didn't even use that as part of her campaign until she found out that most of the people wanted change. She completely stole the whole "change" thing from Obama because she knew it was what people wanted and he was getting votes because of it. I swear if Hillary is elected the democratic nominee, I am voting Republican. Hillary does not equal change. If change is what you really want, vote for Obama. If experience is what you want...don't vote for Hillary, because she doesn't have any. And stop calling Obama a cry baby just because he is calling out Bill on his "dirty tacticts." I don't blame him one bit, and I respect him completely for not firing back false statements about Hillary. This man can change our country for the better. My vote is for Obama and always will be!

e pat   January 21st, 2008 2:19 pm ET

I agree with Suspicious on the 21st, but it is more than just CNN which is biased in its reporting.

Kevin Carroll   January 21st, 2008 2:19 pm ET

Is Hillary not up against two Obamas and an Oprah?

Oh Puhlease!

Martin Eagle, CO   January 21st, 2008 2:19 pm ET

Who is running as a candidate and who will sit in the Oval Office, Bill or Hillary?

danielo   January 21st, 2008 2:18 pm ET

Some people here make reference to Oprah in comparison to Bill stumping for Hill. There is a clear difference.
Oprah was very civil and never went about attacking Hillary. All she said was why she supported Obama.

Now Obama has always said he respects Bill and had refused to be drawn into the spar. But Bill has been lashing out at Obama relentlessly, distorting facts and calling names. We know Bill is a liar and will do anything it takes to pay back Hillary for the cheating on her. But to go this low is the kind of divisive politics the Clintons like playing. Slice and Dice.
Still I think Obama should not wait to be "swift boated" even if it means going after Clinton himself.

Steve   January 21st, 2008 2:18 pm ET

Well if were gonna listen to Hillary cry I guess we might as well indulge Obama when he's acting like a baby too. Aww poor me the Clintons keep ganging up. I got new for you Barack, the more the economy goes in the tank the more you are going to here from Bill Clinton. His eight years in the white house brought unprecedented economic success as well as one of the lowest unemployment rates of old time. If we are infact headed for a recession, people are going to hear much more from Bill.

P.S. That includes you Obama. Toughen up and stick to the issues.

moderate   January 21st, 2008 2:18 pm ET

Its obvious Hillary can't do things herself. She has to use her spouse to do her dirty work. She's giving independent women a bad name.

ELP   January 21st, 2008 2:17 pm ET

I think the controversy between Hillary and Obama has to come the "childish" stage!! I think the real issues are being camouflaged by their antics!

When this campaign first started, I was very, very excited about it and watched the caucases to see who would win what state, but now I am totally disinterested because all I am hearing now is the "back biting."

I am very surprised by Hillary and the fact that she has "Bill Clinton" name calling (of all people)! I previously felt she was a very strong woman and would be an excellent presidential candidate as would Obama, but now, to see that she has Bill speaking for her and has literally taken over her campaign, now I have to wonder if SHE has the leadership skills it takes to RUN THIS COUNTRY. Actually, he's the one running!!!

WAKE UP PEOPLE!! THIS IS SERIOUS BUSINESS!!!

Indiana Democrat   January 21st, 2008 2:17 pm ET

Obama needs to be careful about the approach his campaign is taking. He is working his way towards loosing voters by whining about how rough the politics are. This is nothing compared to what he will face with the Republicans in the general election. Also he is working on alienating white voters. This talk about race is turning him into the black candidate, rather then the candidate that happens to be black. Both of these directions could hurt him in many states after South Carolina.

sane   January 21st, 2008 2:17 pm ET

The Divided States of America at it's best!!!! Things will only get worse for this Country unless We The People learn how to live together as People! Truth crushed down to the earth will rise again.

Shel   January 21st, 2008 2:16 pm ET

If you cant take on 2 Clintons how will you react to the rest of the world. My god , Grow up and stop crying like a baby. Tell us the important things like what you can do verses what others say you do. If you cant take on Hillary and Bill and stand tall, how do you expect to run a country ?

Unbelievable

Derek, IA   January 21st, 2008 2:15 pm ET

Sometimes we Democrats are so stupid about these things. Nobody ever mentions how dirty campaign tricks in the Al Gore/Bill Bradley primary race cost us the presidency in 2000! Al Gore, with the help of the Clinton attack machine, used some of the same dirty tactics to win New Hampshire, ignoring the fact that Al Gore would have easily won the nomination even if he lost New Hampshire. Then, in the general election, New Hampshire voted for Bush because the Bradley supporters refused to vote for Gore. If Al Gore had won New Hampshire, the extra four electoral votes would have made him president, and none of the crap that our country is facing would have ever happened. The Clintons have forgotten that being a democrat is prerequisite to being a Democrat.

America for a new Beginning   January 21st, 2008 2:14 pm ET

If HRC can’t fight her own battles how can she be considered a leader? Quite frankly this shows she isn’t as strong as you all think, but rather her lying husband to fight her battles cause she cries when the going gets tough .And when the Republicans get started on her Bill won’t be able to help her, because his past will be the demise of the Democratic bid for the White House. For someone to have these 35 years of experience she sure hasn’t learned to speak for herself. This only shows her fear of failure. Does America want a person who can’t speak or stand up for herself to make decisions that will affect the future of this country? Are we to wait for her to confer with Bill or see what the polls say before deciding? Too many people seem to be more star struck than using common sense to believe anything will change from the past 20 some years.

Denise   January 21st, 2008 2:14 pm ET

The difference Tonja is Hillary and Bill are still slinging lies and Oprah announced her support and asking the voters to think seriously. Oprah said think seriously and Bill is trying to tell the voters what to think. Also, lest we forget "I did not have sexual relations with that woman". Oops. Ok, I did. We forgave him and he's lying again. It has to cease. Slick Willy is spinning and misquoting Obama. Obama is simply chosing to take the high road. The Clintons want to win at any cost and will say anything to achieve it. That's why they can say that politics is a dirty game. They're covered in it from head to toe. It time for the country to begin listening to what's important for the country as a whole and not greedy individuals.

Mike R   January 21st, 2008 2:14 pm ET

The Clintons will do anything to win. We should all know by now. This is not news. The only problem, and it's a big one, is the in the politics of "slash and burn" the the Clintons employ, we are the ones the get burned. And, as usual, the Clintons will come out on top and we lose.

david s.   January 21st, 2008 2:14 pm ET

First off, I agree 100% with Sen. Obama. If I could vote my vote would definitely be for him. Pres. Clinton's proliferation of false, untrue information is simply disadvantageous to his wife's success in the campaign trail and with the American people. Often this tactic is used to deflect attention from any possible disadvantages that one opponent might have; however what Mr. Clinton is failing to realize is that the American people are not ignorant non whatsoever and by him trying misrepresent Sen. Obama, he is inevitably doing nothing more than mirroring his true, dishonest self off of the opposition. If I at sixteen can see this, I am certain that millions of others see this same thing just as vividly. My advice to Pres. Clinton would be to aid his wife, not hinder her, for that is exactly what he is doing with his dishonest and exaggerated comments. Honesty, when it boils down to it, is what is desired in a potential president. Pres. Clinton is showing that he is incapable of being honest, infact he has shown us that during his time in office. Sen. Hilary Clinton will be held responsible for the comments that her husband has made because he is supposed to be advocating for her and representing what she represents. I say to all of you voters, " Barck Obama, Barack Obama, Barack Obama!"

aQuib   January 21st, 2008 2:13 pm ET

Here are the facts, MOST people are voting for Hilary simply because they want Bill Clinton back in the office. It is that simply. She doesn't represent change. How can she even claim to be "ready for change" when Hilary LITERALLY brings all the history and barrage of the Bill Clinton era. That slogan seems very contradicting. Second fact, HILARY VOTED FOR THE WAR IN IRAQ! So here are the american people choices between Hilary and Obama:

Hilary = same old politics, same old fight, same old barrage
Obama = Change

Like the saying goes "You can't teach a old dog new tricks."

Anonymous   January 21st, 2008 2:13 pm ET

Deal or no deal?

Me in Denver, Coloradop   January 21st, 2008 2:13 pm ET

Clintons are liars.

Gbryant   January 21st, 2008 2:11 pm ET

Sally:

Mind your own business in your own country.

Toddster   January 21st, 2008 2:11 pm ET

Should this be a surprise? Do you think the Clinton's would let anything get in the way of what they think is their "legacy"? Their god (emphasis on the little "g") given right to create history? It's in their destiny. Get out of the way Barak–the Clinton's "deserve" this. Unfortunately Barak sounds like a typical Democrat–crying about what's "unfair". "Unfair" as he defines it. It's part of the game Barak–belly-up and take it. Do yourself and the country a favor–do a better job than she does, because this country DOES NOT need a person like Hillary Clinton as President!

sara,mo   January 21st, 2008 2:11 pm ET

Obama needs to quit whining and tell the american people what
he would actually do for the country – why mud sling against other
candidates when our economy is in shambles? He should be talking
about what he's going to do to rejuvenate our economy instead of
worrying about what somebody else says.

Hillary is actually talking about the issues and telling us what she
would do to try and resolve them. I know that I will be voting for the
candidate that is talking about the issues and helping the american
people. l will be voting for Hillary.

Rachel   January 21st, 2008 2:10 pm ET

It is very clear to me that Obama can't handle a lose at all. He is still a fake and only a good preacher. If he were sincere about what he was preaching he wouldn't sound so much like a preacher. Trust the man if you want but I don't and neither does anyone I know.

Deleted User (California)   January 21st, 2008 2:10 pm ET

I have no objection to Bill's describing Obama as the ROLL OF THE DICE. That is the best description of Obama. Because of his INEXPERIENCE, his election is a BIG GAMBLE with the future of America. Much much more than the gamblers in Las Vegas and Reno, there are Obama supporters who will not stop at gambling the future of American and worse, their children. What is more, Bill's telling the American people that Obama's primary/caucus campaign is a FAIRY TALE is a figurative expression to accurately label Obama's cheap appeal to the emotions of gullible followers, GIVEN Obama's INEXPERIENCE. I congratulate Bill for having used the right terminology to expose what Obama really is.

J B   January 21st, 2008 2:10 pm ET

Take it in stride as practice..........the House and Senate won't be a piece of cake either.

Demvoter, MI   January 21st, 2008 2:09 pm ET

I am an undecided voter that was tilting more towards Obama because I wanted to see a change in how the goverment works. These last few weeks, however, have been very disappointing. Mr. Obama needs to stop the whining and start providing more specifics of HOW he will bring change and please tell me what major things he has done during his short time in office. I am not able to find this SPECIFIC information, even on his website. Yes, he was against the war, but so wasn't I. That doesn't mean that I should be President of the USA. If he were in the US Senate and voted against it, I would be more impressed. I also don't appreciate the fact that he took his name off the MI ballot. I thought that all of our votes should be counted, even if the DNC stripped us of our delegates. The fact that he removed his name tells me he doesn't want my vote.

Unless I start hearing less about the color of his skin and how unfair the Clintons are, he will not get my vote. If he can't handle the softballs being tossed at him, what on earth can we expect during the general election when the Republicans will get going? It will mean we have at least another 4 years of a Republican President!

Melissa M   January 21st, 2008 2:08 pm ET

Hillary will get the nomination fair and square, but Obama will still cry foul. The political game is not for whimps.

Dave, Columbus, OH   January 21st, 2008 2:08 pm ET

We cannot afford to continue the Bush and Clinton dynasties. I am concerned for my grandchildren's futures and therefore will vote for Obama. I have never contributed to a candidate in my 67 years, but I did so today. Obama (and perhaps Edwards) are the only candidates who can bring unity to our country. Hillary is much, much too polarizing; she scares me!

Matt   January 21st, 2008 2:08 pm ET

For those of you who support hillary because if the Clintons experience against right wingers, consider this; Bill Clinton won in 92 with 43% of the vote, and in 96 with 49% of the vote. Without Perot in the race, past experience would show that a less popular and experienced Clinton on the ticket would equal a Republican president. Right now Hillary is campaigning against Obama and barely keeping ahead; Obama is outlining a vision of what America can be in the 21st Century, and runnig to win in November. If you want to be calculated and play the best odds, bet on the canidate that can transform and inspire.

Prince, Cedar Falls, IA   January 21st, 2008 2:08 pm ET

The Clinton's have LIED to and DIVIDED our country long enough!

Get some STRENGTH and SENSE to stand up against this nasty duo and vote ABC!

Kathy   January 21st, 2008 2:07 pm ET

I would'nt expect the spots on the cow to suddenly turn to stripes! Sadly, distorting the facts is something Americans have gotten used to seeing politicians in Washington do! I see more interest in this election than in any other I have ever participated in. I would not understimate the intelligence of the American voter. Many do THINK and COMPARE and LISTEN TO BOTH SIDES before reaching a decision.
Obama's campaign needs to continue to challenge Bill Clinton WHENEVER necessary! Because the "cow will remain the cow!".

Matt   January 21st, 2008 2:06 pm ET

I have little sympathy for Obama, since he has Oprah on his side.

What more can you ask for?

Marc   January 21st, 2008 2:06 pm ET

I see the Clinton campaign has redirected some resources to flooding these comment blogs.... that doesn't change the fact that Bill Clinton, for whom I voted twice, is going around lying (AGAIN), and Hillary is standing by watching her husband do all her heavy lifting for her. Look how bitter and divided the Democratic party is right now because of the Clintons, then imagine what the country as a whole would be like with her as a nominee. The only sure way to elect a Republican is to nominate Clinton.

Michael   January 21st, 2008 2:06 pm ET

Please the former President should stop interferring with his wife's campaign
and focus on his own legacy as President, infact the idea that he goes about
attacking Mr Obama on behalf of his wife is absolutely uncalled for and that
tactics will not under any circumstances get him Ex-President Bill Clinton and the former first Lady Hillary Clinton back to America's White House for another 4-8 years.
We the people of United States of America will vote againts that and with every grassroot effort and support from the American People derail the Clintons
ambition to take over the White House again ...Pls Mr President & First Lady
go home and continue to represent the People of New York as Us Senator.
We will also not forget the humiliation of former Congress Man Rick Lazio
suffered under the Clintons during the debate between Mrs Clinton and Mr Lazio
the first time the former first Lady was runing for the Us Senate Seat in New york.

The Clintons manupullation most stop imediately and stop playing games with
the future of America, infact Mr Barack Obama is the only candidate who will
bring America together once again and not the division of the Clintons
who will do anything to get to white House again even if it means dividing the whole of American People...Thank You Mr Obama for having the backbone in your
effort to STOP these mess the Clintons are trying to do to the American people
with their over aggressive ambition to destroy American democracy.

Bill, SC   January 21st, 2008 2:05 pm ET

Obama attacked Hillary and Hillary responded. Obama then attacked Hillary and Bill (along with Bill's legacy) and Hillary and Bill responded. I've never know Bill Clinton not to step in the ring when someone starts taking pot shots at him. He will not go quietly in the night. I see nothing wrong with Hillary or Bill defending themselves and his administration. He did an excellent job and we can only hope and pray that the next US President will do as good a job as he did. Good luck to all of the candidates.

stanz   January 21st, 2008 2:05 pm ET

We millions od Democrats who support Obama see this pattern of women and some other groups coming out in numbers for Hillary. These are prejudices that are unfair and now it seems women are being biased for someone based on gender.
Women, you are doing the same thing to others that were done to you!

The difference for the African Americans coming out for Obama is that they make up only 12% of the population, and can only affect one state like South Carolina.
Women make up more than 50 % of the Democratic voters and having this decided on gender is superficial.

What do you tell the African American woman who feels Barack is a much better leader, but women won't vote for him simply because they want a woman?

It's abusing your voting privilege to vote either solely or mostly on name and gender. There will be repercussions in November.

Jumpy   January 21st, 2008 2:05 pm ET

Bill Clinton, the man who doesn't consider oral sex as "sexual relations," continues to twist the truth in ways that boggle the mind. I voted for Bill twice, but haven't we had enough of Clinton lies in the White House?

It's only a matter of time before the Clintons' behavior remind everybody what a romper room the Oval Office had become in the 1990s.

Obama is a breath of fresh air. He's made great strides since a few months ago, and the Clinton machine is desperate and on life support.

Lisa,Corpus Christi, Tx.   January 21st, 2008 2:05 pm ET

The problem is not the fact that former President Clinton is campaigning for his wife. The problem is that he is a former president, and of the same party. It is a travisty. Why can't he just inform voters concerning Hillary's "35 year" record or her plan once she takes office..."ready on day one". Why must he go negative.

He is behaving in a manner that is truly undignified for an individual that held the highest office in the land. As Americans we should be completely embarrassed by his current "finger waving" behavior. Heaven forbid Obama recieve the nomination...the rebublicans will have a field day if Bill tries to back pedal and support him in the general election.

raul Blanco Sr.   January 21st, 2008 2:05 pm ET

It seems there is only one photo on the entire file on CNN, the" CAIN Mc Cain" they insert that in all news be or not referent to the mater. In another mater why they want Mr. Clinton not to work, in Mrs. Clinton Campaign? Should you wanted to be working for Obama? This is the partiality way the media is working, and trying to work !

Sally, San Antonio, TX   January 21st, 2008 2:05 pm ET

As far as I'm concerned, Pres. Clinton fairly described Obama's record on Iraq...the voting speaks for itself. Bill Clinton is fulfilling the role of spouse in a campaign and he's doing a good job of it. As for the good cop/bad cop, Obama's campaign is doing the same thing with Axelrod. One other thing, I did not appreciate Obama's praise of Reagan in Nevada. As far as I'm concerned he was not a good president...he represented the monied elite...it takes more than a good sense of humor and a nice smile to make a president and Reagan was very destructive to things I hold dear.

Rick   January 21st, 2008 2:04 pm ET

Does this mean a can't look forward to a Clinton/Obama ticket?

Dave   January 21st, 2008 2:04 pm ET

All these folks who rationalize equating a former President campaigning as the same as another spouse (Michelle Obama, Edwards wife, etc....) are missing the three main points:

1) Bill continues to deliberately mis-represent Obama's positions (are we surprised),
2) Michelle doesn't get the same press and more that a former President does (so is it really equal campaigning of spouses?, if she got the same press as Bill we might know if she was distorting Hillary's position, but she doesn't)
3) Are we electing Hillary or re-electing Bill

Dave

Eve   January 21st, 2008 2:04 pm ET

Also to all those people who think Obama is whining...I say you have it all wrong. Obama is pointing out what we all already know...The Clintons are lying, mudslinging degenerates. he is trying to expose them for what they are...they are power hungry and will stop at nothing. Bill Clinton definately wants a third term. It has nothing to do with "his new role." It's all about the power. I have zero respect for either of them. Bill has a proven record of lying and deceit. Think about this for a moment...we surround ourselves with people who are like us..we marry people with traits we admire...so what does that tell you about Hillary.

At first I really thought it would be great to have a female president. But not this female...you lost my support..you and your husband's conduct the last month have made me sick...

Obama 08...

Sally   January 21st, 2008 2:03 pm ET

As an outsider to this process but on behalf of the rest of the world, it beggars belief that the US gene pool is only talented enough to support 2 families running the White House for quarter of a century?

Please America, show us all that you have learned that making someone President because of their family name isn't a clever move?

Frank K.   January 21st, 2008 2:03 pm ET

Obama's petulant whining about the double teaming being perpetrated on him by the Clintons gets no sympathy from me. What would Barack have us think that his orchestrated "love fest" with the over-hyped Oprah Winfrey was?

Paul   January 21st, 2008 2:03 pm ET

Bill Clinton balanced the federal budget and ran our country with a surplus. A surplus!! Name me one other President that did that in the last 40 years? I care more about what this man says, with all his ACTUAL experience and results, than any body else out there running for President. Obama is a honorable man? Who cares. I want someone who can get results, balance the budget and protect my income stream. "Honorable men" fall back on that moniker because they can't accomplish real results.

fda   January 21st, 2008 2:02 pm ET

I hope in the evening debate that the two can set aside the back and forth to give the people what they need, and that's truthful solid answers as to how they plan to regroup this country and give the american people some satisfaction in their concerns. Straight answers,nothing rehearsed, copied, or irrelevant to what the people need to know about the future of this country.

I must say it does seem that Bill is in the debate far more than Hillary. Are people under the impression that they're getting Bill back as President? I heard him say he'd be there for her if she needed him.. but I've read, heard and seen diffferently. He's mouthing off as though she's impaired and can't speak for herself. I feel that this is Hillary's race but Bill's Term. After all the chaos, i believe the people truly are voting for Hillary in hopes of a repeat of Bill.

If Hillary wasn't Bill's wife would she have even come thus far ? Her history is his history. I believe she's remained Mrs. Clinton to get to this point, but will she be recognized on her own merit or her husbands ? I'm very disappointed in the African American community(males), because they should see Obama as inspiration for life and beating the odds whether they vote for he and his views or not. I have been reduced to having to read about grown men name calling with words that came from our negative history... this is what we teach the African Amercian youth , how sad. Pastors, Black civil rights leaders, prominent black business men, athletes, black actors etc .. that walk around with their chest out and whining about equality and your struggles as blacks and portraying themselves as postive role models but yet you step out from behind that mask and degrade your own kind with racial slurrs, and downgrading a man that found it a postive move in life to run for a limited position.

America will never be quite right because we fight amongst one another with belief that resolves something, when all your really doing is showing other countries that we fight for idiotic reasons and what best way to havea country self destruct but watch them fight against one another instead joining as on one accord to be the most prosperous, educated, dominant coutry standing. It'll never happen we value chaos to much. At one time to my witnessing we weren't in war with one another was 9-11, for couple of hours, race, gender ,financial status didn't really matter if we were going to be attacked, what mattered for that brief moment in time was that we were there for one another no matter what , if african american could help a hispanic or a hispanic a caucasian from any different back ground it didn't matter where the help and concern came from it was just support for one another.

America has become laughing stock and considered no better than any other place. We can't dictate to anyone else how to live when we're a mess at best ourselves, can't even follow thru with a presidential election without sheer ignorance. Best of luckh to all of the Candidates, I don't think we're getting the truth and the best from any of them , just rehearshed promises.

Vince FL.   January 21st, 2008 2:02 pm ET

As I read through the various comments it's obvious that there are so many people in this country that care absolutely nothing about truth and honesty. No wonder we are in the shape that we're in. Bill Clinton has always been a liar, why would he change now. He wants to get back in the White House at any cost. This is all about Bill. I hope that we Americans Dem and Rep say NO MORE CLINTON'S NO MORE BUSH'S FOREVER !!!!!!!!!!!

Let's Give Barack a chance!!!!!!!!!!

Michael   January 21st, 2008 2:02 pm ET

Mrs. Obama has been campaigning on behalf of her husband. Bill Clinton is campaigning on behalf of Hillary. If he didn't, wouldn't that appear unusual? I have heard about "Chicago politics", and thought Obama would be much more thick-skinned than he is. There can not be a double-standard.

I believe the media will eventually detect this weakness in Obama, and will use it in almost the same manner that they have used to attack Hillary Clinton. The one difference is the media does not want to be portrayed as being racist. Let's see how they handle this.

And the important difference here is that Hillary Clinton handled these attacks like a future President would. And there is the difference. Obama is not ready yet, Hillary is.

I am solidly behind Hillary Clinton for President!

Jay Conky   January 21st, 2008 2:02 pm ET

Oh stop whining Barack! It was fine when you had your wife attacking Hillary every chance she got for months. And now you get a little taste of your own medicine and you hurt. Next time, reap only what you can sow in return.

Mary, Las Vegas   January 21st, 2008 2:01 pm ET

Kinda like running against Obama & Oprah?
Who's whining now?

Brian Des Moines, Ia   January 21st, 2008 2:01 pm ET

See folks Obama can't stand the HEAT!! This is his first "real" test...and he is crying!!!

HOW DO YOU THINK THE REPUBLICANS WILL DEAL WITH HIM....NOT WITH KID GLOVES I AM SURE!!!

Suraj   January 21st, 2008 2:01 pm ET

Obama is right. Anyone with a head on his/her shoulders can see the Clintons' good cop/bad cop strategy. In fact, some prominent democratic leaders have phoned Bill to refrain himself (please see the Newsweek article).

A young, brave Obama is running for president against two Clintons combined. He has maintained to run a positive, up-lifting campaign even though the Clintons have been consistently running negative and smear campaign after Iowa.

So far, Obama has won the Iowa pledged delegates by 1, tied the NH delegates, and won the Nevada delegates by 1 against the powerful Clinton machine ran by a former president and a former First Lady.

If Obama loses to the Clintons, the democrats can not win in November. The country is sick of division, playing political favor, and scoring political points without good judgment, leadership, and inspiring and unifying ability to solve real issues.

joe   January 21st, 2008 2:01 pm ET

Bush#1: Not great let's try clinton

Clinton#1: Okay.....except no morals and disgraced and lied to the country

Bush#2: Got some morals back....but the country fell apart

Clinton#2????; Please don't make us find out, at least Obama might bring change...the only candidate republican or democrat that could take us further down than Bush#2 is Clinton#2.......Clinton supporters can give up now.....even if you smear Obama......there is allready over 40% of Americans who would rather stay home or switch parties.....anything to not see another Clinton/Bush term.

Lili   January 21st, 2008 2:01 pm ET

Bill was impeached – really?!?!

If Senator Obama has earned that title so has Senator Clinton – Senator Obama should at least have the common courtesy to address her as such.

Bev   January 21st, 2008 2:00 pm ET

Martin Luther King Jr. may have been fighting for the black community and he may have been marching with blacks, but because of him blacks, latino's, native americans, orientals, women, and the poor of all skin colors in the U>S>A and Canada have the freedoms and are able to get the education that they can today. I remember a time when the news was asking if the people that had been given the right to vote in the U.S. might not turn out to vote and that alot of them were unable to read and write so how would they be able to vote. I elieve that they were talking about the black community if my memory serves me right. O how far have we all come and how much farther we have to go. MLK fought for all disadvantaged people. He fought against racism so it disenhartens me to hear all this talk about black voters, latino voters, and women voters. It harkens back to the time of extreme racism and divisions along the lines of race and gender. It is divisive to the country. I sincerely hope that you will vote on the bassis of the national issues facing you because not to can only hurt the U.S.A. Continued battleing can only divide and weaken your party and your country.

Lying and smeering personal reputations only divides and hurts your party and country at home and abroad. If a person who the world views as dishonest is elected to the Whitehouse the world will not trust or be slow to trust and follow. Please do remember that the world and especially the friends of the U.S.A. are watching listening and judgeing.

Democracy in the U.S.A. is it working for all or just for a few? Are your elections truly fair or are only the rich and most powerful, the only ones who can win?

Samuel D   January 21st, 2008 2:00 pm ET

Americans should be tried of these political dynasties which rule the U S A. The Clintons have been in the Presidental office for eight years. Now they are fighting for the Black vote to get back in. WHAT DID THE CLINTONS DO FOR BLACKS WHEN THEY HAD THE OFFICE? That's right, nothing at all. H Clinton has held the Senate seat in New York. Doesn't look like much in New York has changed for blacks in her state. The next time the media talks about how much the Clintons have done for Blacks take it for what it is, just talk.

H Clinton promotes a policy for illegal immagrants which will further help the destruction and economic will being of Black Americans. Why would any red blooded American vote for her?

Experience as first lady doesn't equate to presidental experience.

manny james marietta ga   January 21st, 2008 2:00 pm ET

Hillary in "08" I'm so happy she started fighting back. Before, she was getting beat up real bad by the media, Edwards, Obama and everyone else in the house. She will show us all how strong she is.. She will win inspite of the odds being against her,...

agron   January 21st, 2008 1:59 pm ET

Obama fans ...Hillary win NH–MI–NEVADA,..i think American people vote for right choice, she its [Hillary] smart leader....SHe win all DEBATE against Obama..period

HILLARY–OBAMA 08 My choice...

Agron Mi

Praveen   January 21st, 2008 1:59 pm ET

Pointing out twisted statements and unjust attacks is not whining. It is something civilized, classy people do. if Obama was anything like the Clintons ( I do not want to make any distinction between Bill and Hillary, they both deserve each other) he would have resorted to similar tactics. I know, like rest of the world does, there is an abundance of material for Obama to use if he wants to stoop so low. He won't because it is beneath him.
wake up stupid people.

Randy   January 21st, 2008 1:59 pm ET

As if no one uses the experience of their cronies.
If you think that every predident we have ever had only relied on themselves to make decisions, then you are so wrong. They, the presidents, take advice from many people, including their cabinet, friends, family and their conctituents to formulate an opion. Why wouldn't Hillary include Bill in her opion making.
Everyone else in a democracy does it. And they should.

Carol   January 21st, 2008 1:59 pm ET

Hillary did the mock tears act just before the N.H. primary. Then the Tyra Banks show that was taped quite a while ago was aired just before Nevada. Interesting.
Hillary in her comments in a debate said she can not control what her campaign staff does. Obviously she is unable to control Bill. So what can she control
Is this Presidential material?
As far as whining goes Bill does his share of whining as well. As long as Hillary is winning everything is fine. Once Barack starts to gain he starts complaining and whining. about anything and everything
Bill and Hillary had no respect for the Lincoln Bedroom, a national treasure. They allowed the Lincoln Bed to be used as a trampoline by Linda Thomason and actress Markie Post . Over 800 people used the bedroom during the Clinton years. Danny DeVito is alleged to have said he and his wife went in and trashed the place
The White House belongs to the American People, not the Current Occupant. The Clinton's used it for their own political financial gain.
The White House Chef probably has more years in the White House than Hillary's eight years. Give me a BREAK. Her 8 years in the White House..That the biggest fairy tale I have ever heard

In my opinion, and yes it is only my opinion, The CLINTONS are a Disgrace.
And think about the White House Heist when they left. How many more Gifts to the White House will they claim this time as Gifts to the Clinton's if they are elected?
They do not deserve a second chance to discredit the American people and abuse the White House...the House of the American People

Brbaraa   January 21st, 2008 1:59 pm ET

Do we want a Bill and Hillary Co-Presidency? This is the real question.

Leah DiMarco, TX   January 21st, 2008 1:59 pm ET

If I were ever to vote for a woman as president it would have to be a woman that got on the ballot on her own merits without having an ex-president as a husband.

It is a shame that we as women finally have a chance to vote a woman as president and all we have is this sorry situation. It is a DISGRACE and it is time for Bill and Hillary to go home!!!

As a woman I feel offended and ashamed by the Clinton's tactics.

Vote for anyone but a Clinton or Bush – enough is enough!

ctibb   January 21st, 2008 1:58 pm ET

Clinton in 08, this is politics, Obama can't be above it and win, he must play the game. would Obama accept a vice pres nomination with Hillary, or will she choose Bill? Maybe Edwards...I think Clinton-Obama would be a winning ticket.

Statistics   January 21st, 2008 1:58 pm ET

Don't forget in 1992 it was Ross Perot who GAVE the presidency to Bill Clinton. Perot's weight on the presidental electon was monumental. If you don't think so look at the popular vote election results: Bill Clinton won with 43.0%; HW Bush 37.4%, and Ross Perot 18.9%. Clinton won by only 5.6% of the popular vote. Perot's influence on america's voting was impressive. If Perot had not been involved in the political process at that time I would bet his votes would have gone to HW. It will be interesting to see how the independent voters go this round.

Renee   January 21st, 2008 1:57 pm ET

Last time I checked history, Bill Clinton had his turn at president. It's fine to campaign for your wife as a husband, but who is really running anyway? The swipes at Barack Obama are typical of the Clinton persona–yes, both Clintons. For a campaign that is also running on "change" it appears nothing has changed. Obama's campaign is the only legitimate one that can rightly stand on a platform of change.

Raman, Plano TX   January 21st, 2008 1:57 pm ET

*****
John January 21, 2008 1:47 pm ET

Bill Clinton is not behaving like a former President of the United States. It is a conflict of interest for him to be running Hillary's campaign.
*****

Well former Pres. Clinton is a United States Citizen by birth and is exercising his rights.

It your perception of rights and duties of a President, that is flawed, John.

Krista   January 21st, 2008 1:57 pm ET

I'm SO tired of the Clinton's and the fact that they THINK they are invincible. I'm even more tired of everyone referring to the FORMER President as "President Clinton".

Patrick   January 21st, 2008 1:56 pm ET

Wow!

I have been reading comments from all of the camps over various articles on this website regarding the campaigns for the last several weeks – and this long back-and-forth is illustrative of what i usually see: Many Clinton supporters resort to "No... YOU chill" or "Barack's a crybaby" responses – not very convincing that they have put alot of thought in the controversy or issues of the day. Although Obama supporters occasionally stray into similar simple retorts – they do so much less often – and generally present a more useful discussion.

I think that we all would agree that comparing and contrasting candidates is perfectly fair by both sides. However, it is clear that former President Clinton (more often actually than his wife, the actual candidate) has resorted to serial and severe mischaracterizations of Sen Obama's record of opposition to the war in Iraq and of his statements regarding the Republicans of the 80s and 90s being the party of ideas (something first uttered in 1979 by then-Sen Daniel Patrick Moynihan D-NY – whose seat is now occupied by Sen Clinton – and repeated as recently as 2002 by former President Clinton himself!). Notice Obama did not say they had "good ideas" or that Reagan was "good for the country" – he simply stated that Reagan took the nation in a new direction after 1980 – an indisputable historic fact. He clearly meant that Democrats cannot win by just being AGAINST the Republicans and Bush – but we had to make our case to the American people with NEW, clear ideas of our own!

More important than this recent dust-up is one unassailable fact: ALL THREE candidates are excellent, intelligent leaders whose differences are MINIMAL on ALL of the issues of the day (except for the war – I believe Hillary is a bit more hawkish than Obama or Edwards). So the real comparison is about STYLES of leadership. These contrasting styles are evident in their campaign performance and rhetoric thus far.

MOST important is to decide WHO CAN WIN in November.

Remember, the Republicans are a fractured party – with the leading candidates ALL carrying significant baggage in terms of social conservative, fiscal conservative or national security conservative credentials (or lack thereof) – manifesting in the form of a signifacant (and often different) block of the Republican base being AGAINST each of them. Whoever they finaly nominate, it is clear that a large number of unensthusiastic Republicans may simply chose to stay home in November.

The only thing that would change this Republican apathy and defeatism is Hillary Clinton's nomination as the Democratic candidate.

Neither John Edwards nor Barack Obama have the built in negatives that will DRIVE Republicans to the polls in November like a Hillary Clinton nomination would. This anti-Hillary fervor from an otherwise dispirited Republican electorate coupled with the loss of many independents and even some Democrats who are simply tired of the Clinton Family Dynasty and stranglehold on our party – and who might chose to vote for a McCain or even a third party candidate such as NYC Mayor Bloomberg (who many are convinced will NOT jump in UNLESS it is Hillary who gets the nomination) could result in a shocking LOSS in an election that we should not only win in November – but win in a manner that will allow us to consolidate and improve our margins in the House and Senate.

Swing state and Red state Democrats already know this – which is why Governors and Senators from North and South Dakota, Missouri, Nebraska and Arizona are endorsing Obama. They know that only he can carry their states in a general election and, perhaps more critically, enhance the chances of "down-ticket candidates" – those vying for national or statewide legislative or other elected office.

Bill Clinton in his Charlie Rose interveiw a few weeks back was right about one thing – that the nomination of one candidate represents a risk – or in his words a "roll of the dice." However, he was wrong about which candidate was the risky one.

The real "roll of the dice" for Democrats over the next several weeks and months is NOT support for Obama or Edwards – but rather the continued support of Hillary Clinton, who has the LEAST chance of leading the Democratic Party to victory in the Fall.

Frank Esper   January 21st, 2008 1:56 pm ET

Fact is, I would rather vote republican than for Hilary or another 4 years of Bill. Some Republicans are the better alternative to the Clintons.

Keep up the good fight Barack

Frank

Joe   January 21st, 2008 1:56 pm ET

Complain complain complain, whine whine whine...Obama, if you can't handle the heat from a former President, then I don't see how you can handle the heat from foreign countries, the senate or congress. Sorry, I just can't join your team until you actually look, sound and ACT like a leader.

Tonja   January 21st, 2008 1:56 pm ET

What's the difference between Hillary using Bill to gain momentum and Obama using Oprah? Seriously, these two candidates are now so annoying with their high school antics that neither of them will get my vote.

Jim   January 21st, 2008 1:56 pm ET

Let us all come together and challenge CNN to do a fact check on what Bill put forth and see if it was really distorted or not! That is assuming you want the truth and not just hear say.

All in favor – say – yea

aware   January 21st, 2008 1:56 pm ET

Your poor judgment in a premature run for president is obvious now. You chose to run against Hillary now. Team Clinton is more experienced than Team Obama in every way. You could have had them supporting you if you had not sought instant gratification. Don't expect any more free passes. Your obfuscation is becoming obvious to more and more people. It is funny to hear you accusing Team Clinton of tactics you yourself use. :) You are beginning to sound like a wimp. Shelack and Billary in the ring! Stick to the issues!

deann   January 21st, 2008 1:56 pm ET

I feel the former President Clinton just telling American Citizen the truth, Be fair, the FIRST ATTACKING Hillary Clinton are both Obama and his wife Michelle, which I saw on Obama's campaign, now your record being questionS and your REALLY behavior bring to the public, then you are going to yell and getting angry, is that fair? One way traffic is Dead End Street. If it is your personal attitude to face and handling difference opinions, you are definitely not our hope.

BP   January 21st, 2008 1:55 pm ET

How can anyone support or vote for Hillary Clinton when she will be (and I assure you he will) directly influenced in the leadership of this country by a man who lied to the faces of the entire country. Regardless if this is a personal issue or not, he outright lied in an attempt to save his own selfish skin rather then be a real leader and own up to his obvious lack of morals. Also, by Hillary sticking by this guy was just to maintain her own political ambitions, another selfish act by another Clinton. “Give me a break”…… the country should be giving there heads a shake if they believe anything that comes out of his mouth.

Cornelius Akubueze   January 21st, 2008 1:53 pm ET

If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen. The Clintons has always been pummelled by the neo conservatives hired by the Republicans, they have more than a thousand talk show hosts attacking them 24 hours a day, everyday I try to search for stations that have anything good to say about the Clintons and ther democratic party, at each time I find they are in endangered specie list. Now they Republican and their dictators are tying to use Obama to divide and conquer, they will loose. After nearly 8 years of their mess, who else can fix the nation like it was done after the senior BusH? Of course the Clintons. Let's talk about the economy, the deficit, the out sourcing of American Jobs, the disapperance of "made in America" while our troops die overseas creating markets to those who could care less. Leave the Clintons alone, they have been good to the average person.

Patrick, Bethlehem,PA   January 21st, 2008 1:53 pm ET

If Obama's wife has been out their saying stuff about the Clintons, how come we haven't heard about it.

It is either she is not saying anything, or the media is just choosing not to cover it, which means they are choosing sides.

aware   January 21st, 2008 1:53 pm ET

Your poor jugment in a premature run for president is obvious now. You chose to run againt Hillary now. Team Clinton is more experienced than Team Obama in every way. You could have had them supporting you if you had not sought instant gratification. Don't expect anymore free passes. Your obfuscation is becoming obvious to more and more people. It is funny to hear you accusing Team Clinton of tactics you yourself use. :) You are beginning to sound like a wimp. Shelack and Billary in the ring! Stick to the issues!

Chris   January 21st, 2008 1:53 pm ET

Obama voted to fund the war after he was against it – TRUE
Obama did nothing to denounce the attack ad against Hillary in Nevada – TRUE
Obama tried to use the race comment that he knew was not race motivated to his advantage – TRUE

Where are the false "attacks"?

GROW UP. Of course your partner will stand with you and support you. Your just upset because your wave has ended and Michelle is not as big an impact as Bill.

HILLARY 08!

donald cedar rapids, iowa   January 21st, 2008 1:52 pm ET

as someone who HATES george bush i have to say that bill and hilary are giving me the same feelings something i never thought i would say. but they are running a republican style campaign. and they have the nerve to attack obama for being honest about reagan. i pray to GOD that she looses.

John Thomson   January 21st, 2008 1:51 pm ET

Too many Bushes and Clintons in US politics – enough of dynasty already.

We are beginning to resemble India and Pakistan with Gandhi and Bhutto lines of succession.

Time for a change?

Vote for Obama!

JT

James Brown ( Independent )   January 21st, 2008 1:51 pm ET

Hillary would most likely make a real good Vice President , after all she had years of experience at playing second fiddle to all Bills girl friends.

I. from Denmark   January 21st, 2008 1:51 pm ET

As far as I can see – Mr. Obama is not "crying". He is trying to CHANGE the political "dirty game". For that he will be – and your country will be respected all over the world.

Marty   January 21st, 2008 1:51 pm ET

For all those who think they will get a co-presidency with Bill and Hillary.

I would think very carefully about that if I were you.

Bill has a bad ticker – remember that major heart operation he had a couple of years ago ? He's also looking much older. He looks worse than McCain, who is a decade older. What if he died while his wife was in office ? Would you feel safe and reassured about having Mrs. Clinton in the presidency ?

Go, OBama.

wb   January 21st, 2008 1:51 pm ET

During the summer Hillary's people spent great effort to separate her from Bill saying that he would not have a primary role? since Obama has proven to be such a formidable candidate her campaign is now publicizing his active involement. How are we to believe this back and forth spin coming from her camp/
A strong spouse is an asset, as Michelle is to Obama, but who are we really voting for with H&B?

Reggie   January 21st, 2008 1:50 pm ET

Now that Senator Obama is standing up for himself he is considered a whiner and mudslinger. Come on people, if you don't support the guy fine. But at least be fair.

CMT   January 21st, 2008 1:50 pm ET

Its funny Barack Obama is now making references to feeling like he is running against Bill Clinton. It seems like only a few weeks ago is was Hillary Clinton running against Oprah Winfrey.....

Dan, Syr   January 21st, 2008 1:49 pm ET

Hey Barack – if your wife was a former popular president, you'd be using her too!

Nancy   January 21st, 2008 1:48 pm ET

It should surprise no one that the Clintons' are playing dirty politics. It's time people realize that they are interested in no one but themselves.

The more we hear or see them their crudeness, dishonesty and corruption shines through.

Bill spews forth garbage. Hillary talks fight, fight, fight....: Fight Obama, Fight the Republicans, Fight the president, make all states blue. Seems to me their policy is to divide and conquer.

Havn't we had enough of their tactics:

NextPresident   January 21st, 2008 1:48 pm ET

Funny, you people cry about how negative past campaigns have been and Obama has been attacking Hillary's record. He has not called her political career a "fairy tale" nor has he attacked Bill Clinton, which I wish he would. But many of you are so stuck on these criminals it is truly pathetic. How many years of BUSH/Clinton/Bush/Clinton? Are you not tired of the same old schitt?

And as for those who say Oprah is his spokes woman, please tell me where Oprah has said anything negative against HILLBILLARY? She has not and who were the ones attacking Obama, Clinton Supporter, Robert Johson, Al Sharpton, Bill Clinton, Andrew Young, John Lewis. These sad misleaders who are afraid of change are the ones that have been attacking Obama. Obama does not discriminate he tries to be inclusive more than I can say for the rest of these candidates. And as a President one has to be inclusive andthat is what is feared by the old politicans is that he identifies with the poor and middle class, something the majority of the democrats hate, because they love those social programs.

Obama is not whining when he said he is campaigning against both Clinton, that is true. Bill needs to stick to being an ex-president and Hillary needs to go. Even daddy Bush did not come out for Chimpy like Bill has for Hillary.
The status quo is afraid of change that is the ultimate problem and a problem for many of the sheep in this country. The people who are voting for Hillary, McCain and not for Edwards, Obama or even Romney are stuck on stupid and have no clue. They truly think that these people who have been in the gov truly want change rather than business as usual, sticking to the poor and middle class.

Wake up people, enough of the criminal elements in the White House.

John   January 21st, 2008 1:47 pm ET

Bill Clinton is not behaving like a former President of the United States. It is a conflict of interest for him to be running Hillary's campaign.

In addition, I think he's getting senile.

Laura   January 21st, 2008 1:47 pm ET

Barack is up against a great deal more than Bill Clinton. He is in for the first fair election process in the nation, where unidentified people are not allowed to walk into the polls and vote.

South Carolina voters – please note from past elections that there are always rumors the day before a primary, trying to convince you that some candidate is pulling out, or has made a deal with another one. We had it AGAIN here in Iowa. Also Hillary's people were going door-to-door with a false rumor in Nevada Friday night. Those rumors are never true! You are the first people in the country whose vote is pure and real, and means something. Use it to make a statement!

Jackson   January 21st, 2008 1:47 pm ET

Obama praises Reagan and the GOP ... and he doesn't expect to be criticized for it? ... he needs to grow up and stop whining about his mistakes and trying to blame other people.

Big L   January 21st, 2008 1:47 pm ET

oh poor Obama! What will he do when if world leaders come up against him at the same time? Whine?
I guess he didn't realize he was playing in the big leagues now.
He should stop whining, and tell the voters what his plans for the country are.

Tonilyn, it's interesting you say this considering it was Hilary who cried in N.H. because allegedly the biys were ganging up on her. Ask that same question about Hilary!

Marty   January 21st, 2008 1:46 pm ET

For all those who say that Obama is thinskinned, well I suggest they go back and look at the history of this primary campaign. I was up in New Hampshire and the night before the election, when the Clintons thought they were going to lose, you should have heard the complaints coming out of the campaign.... about supposed phone calls the Obama campaign was making to voters, while meanwhile the Clintons were sending out a false mailer on Obama's stand on abortion.

Clinton dismissively calling Obama "a kid. " This is no way for an ex President to be speaking of someone from his own party.
What if Obama had called Clinton an "old man ?"

The Clintons have played the race card and every other trick in the book. The problem for the Obama campaign is they didn't start fighting back – until now.

Bill Clinton is embarrassment and he needs to get off this stage – NOW. The Republcans will eat Hillary Clinton alive.

If Clinton is the nominee, welcome to a McCain presidency. Mark my words.

No hillary for president   January 21st, 2008 1:46 pm ET

In the history of fighting for president, Obama is fighting two. Bill and Hillary. I will vote for Mccain if Billary is the nominee.

Chris NY   January 21st, 2008 1:45 pm ET

I agree with Obama all the way,Who else has had the advantage of having a spouse who was a two term President campaging for them.
She is the one who needs her husband to get her elected and scream at the press and put a spin on anything Obama says.I loved Bill in office but he needs to back off and stop using his tactics to undermine a very honest man, and lets STOP using the race issue, Obama had a white mother, let''s respect that. He is an American! Why does race always have to be a part of the discussion? He does not bring race in to it., everyone else does. Let's move beyond color, especially today, remembering what Dr King did 40 years ago.

Feed up in IL   January 21st, 2008 1:45 pm ET

Al Gore did not want Bill to campaign for him "Big Mistake." He got off his sick bed to campaign for Kerry. I think he would have been as big of advocate for them as he is for Hillary. She is his wife, and Obama wife has been out here telling Black America to "wake up." Say what you want against Bill, he did not do little boys and he is fighting for his wife, who stayed with him.
I am so sick of people passing judgement on their marriage, 60% of all married couples have affairs. And, 50% of marriages end in Divoice. If a man can not fight for his wife, who should he fight for?
Obama has never won against a strong opponent and maybe he will be ready in 2016. He should stop whinning and start stating his positions, if he has any. His Hopes are not going to Change what's going on in this country today.
If he want to play with the big dogs, he needs to get off the pourch or bring his "big momma Oprah" back out.

Damien   January 21st, 2008 1:44 pm ET

I am wondering why the democratic party does not realize that if Hillary wins the nomination, that there is no way that she will win the election. She may be able to win the Primaries by dividing the Black vote but she will never win over the conservatives on the fence. They ( conservatives on the fence ) do not like her, nor do a large number liberal black voters, who feel like the Clintons' have assumed the "black vote". The assumption again was a miscalculation and once that was realized the Clinton Machine let loose Bill. The polarizing effects of Bill Clinton's attacks on Obama are a serious miss calculation by the Clinton machine, yes they may win but at what cost. I firmly believe that Hillary backers would vote for Obama if he were to win the Dem Nomination, but seriously doubt if Obama backers are going to vote for Clinton if she wins the Nomination. The devicive nature of the Clinton Mahine will back-fire, leaving lacluster Republican nominee, whomever that may be an easy winner over the Dem Nominee if that be Billary

get truth guy   January 21st, 2008 1:44 pm ET

does he really know what is the "change" he was talking about? he is running on a empty word of "change", no meat.

neil, tampa, florida   January 21st, 2008 1:44 pm ET

I agree with Obama. A fair campaign and debate between him and Hillary is fine but she should fight her own battle and keep her husband out of it. It is demeaning to what is left of Bill Clinton's stature but, then again, with them it is all about winning at all costs. Who will be president if she wins.....her or Bill? You can tell he will have his hands ALL over policy and decision making.

Deleted User   January 21st, 2008 1:44 pm ET

Sen. Leahy , Sen. John Kerry, Gov. Neapolitano gave statements not supported by facts in endorsing Obama, because Hillary outranks Obama on experience, ability, and even in debate performance. They all have been ganging up on Hillary. But they have been frustrated by the caucus and primary voters for Hillary. Let's level the playing field. Bill, go get em! You're doing fine. You and Hillary have beaten Leahy, Kerry, etc. And now seeing the frustration of pro-Obama endorsements, Ted Kennedy and Re. Emanuel (from Illinois like Obama) are telling Bill to tone down. Why should Bill, when Obama did not tone down his Nevada ad liars, despite calls to Obama to tell his prevaricating Nevadan admakers to even tone down? Ted and Rep. Emanual should shut up and remain neutral. They never told Obama to rein in his prevaricating Nevada radio admakers. They are unwittingly (or wittingly?) portraying themselves as the divisive forces in the Democratic Party. Bottom line, the American people are entitled to know the candidates well. All cards about the candidates should be laid on the table. "Roll of the dice" is an acceptable phrase to be attributed to Obama, and should not be toned down because it aptly describes Obama as INEXPERIENCED. In fact, the Las Vegas Review Journal, Nevada's largest newspaper criticized Obama's LACK OF EXPERIENCE and this CHANGE preachings are the OPPOSITE OF CHANGE. that explains Obama's loss in Nevada. Thus, it is and should be politically and intellectually correct for Bill to have said – and for right-thinking voters to think – that indeed Obama's campaign is a FAIRY TALE, with all the INEXPERIENCE and OXYMORON that Obama FACTUALLY represents.

lupe gonzalez   January 21st, 2008 1:43 pm ET

I concur Marty.

Susan M   January 21st, 2008 1:42 pm ET

How can anyone claim that Hillary is running against both Obamas? I have yet, to this day, read anything about what Michelle Obama has said because she doesn't get the press that a former President of the United States gets. I agree that Obama is running against two Clintons. Bill is Hillary's "attack dog". She has been chastized by some of the Democrat establishment for allowing him to continue his "attacks" on Obama and says she is grateful to have such a "passionate" spouse. What's even worse are the attacks are a distorted versions of the truth. Is Hillary going to be the kind of President that has to send her husband to fight it out for her? This goes against the very idea of feminism!

I am a registered Republican, a women, and over the age of 50. I hope I get the opportunity to vote for Barack Obama in 2008. I believe he is someone our world needs now as his vision is to combat the divisiveness that has for so long torn us agart. I believe that Hillary only wantst to become President for selfish reasons.

Tony   January 21st, 2008 1:42 pm ET

we did not see George W.crying , because someone questioned his record.

Kevin   January 21st, 2008 1:40 pm ET

I think Bill Clinton should step back from the Clinton Campaign. This is the Hillary Clinton campaign. Bill, you have already been President! Will Hillary have to check with you at night if she is making the right decisions? Bill Clinton's consistent presence in the campaign indicates to me that Hillary can't win without him. America must seperate the two! Hillary can you stand on your own? If not, I don't think we need you as President

Roger   January 21st, 2008 1:40 pm ET

Hillary, if elected, will invade Iran. She will do it solo if necessary, and it doesn't matter if the United States becomes a third world country in the process, just as long as the objective is met.

Invading Iran would be done in the interest of her backers', and those same backers don't have America's best interest at heart.

Jim   January 21st, 2008 1:40 pm ET

"Surplus" again anyone?

Barbara sining "Happy days are here again" anyone?

Cory, PA   January 21st, 2008 1:40 pm ET

I don't think Obama is "whinning." He's merely stating that without Bill, Hillary Clinton could be and has always been nothing.

Please, South Carolina.... Vote Obama!

Obama '08!

Mati   January 21st, 2008 1:40 pm ET

The picture is good! Don't pick on me...Mr. Obama, this was supposed to be harder than Harvard school where they have to be politically correct about race. You run against Hillary Clinton, don;t forget this. Your wife campaigns for you, and you brought Oprah to support you, remember? Bill Clinton wasn't involved in the beginning, he started to get involved when you showed your teeth. I perfectly understand, Hillary's campaign has to use any ammunition. And Bill was right about your Iraq inconsistency, and you got into a trap by yourself with "Republican was the party of ideas" and your Regan hero, not to mention comparisons with JFK and MLK. When you start talking, you forget thinking... or maybe its that young speech writer's fault?

richarewhee   January 21st, 2008 1:39 pm ET

How can Obama possibly respect Bill Clinton?? " IF " Hillary is elected the first she will do is get rid of him.

R   January 21st, 2008 1:39 pm ET

Yup, that would be two, two, two Clints in one.

Scott   January 21st, 2008 1:39 pm ET

You people are so crazy, just a couple of weeks ago you were saying that Hillary was whining when she cried on TV, secondly about experience, haven't you had enough of experience in washington. George Bush has been a CEO of companies, all of them failed or had problems, just like all of the problems we have now with our country. Lets see, Dick Cheney has experience, so did Donald Rumsfield, Paul Wolfowitz, the whole administration of people with experience. Secondly who is Bill Clinton to question anyone's character. Also understand, Bill Clinton just happened to be president at a time when the the .com boom was in full force. People remember one man does not balance a budget, or make the economy better, it's all about timing. Now I am a black man and I would like to vote for Mayor Bloomberg if he runs, because the problem is we need to get away from the Democratic and Republican party. You see I don't blame George Bush for the whole economy fiasco, but I do blame him for all of the blatant lies that they are allowing to keep the country divided, and us as people keep falling for the same old division every four years, and then sit around and complain because we live off of fear that is put into society by the media because they benefit, from race issues, negative campaigns. What all of you so call intelligent people should really be concerned about is an election costing 1 billion dollars, when people have lost there jobs, homes, medical care, and we will all be in that boat unless we get truthful, not racial. You see the problem with America, is whites people try to speak about black race, how can they unless they have been black. Just like blacks can't speak about race issues with whites because we have never been white, but the funny thing is I watch TV and I see these so call pundits who are supposely experts on issue's and they most of the time they are wrong. You people are like robot's, you follow polls, and if you didn't learn from New Hampshire, you are not as intelligent as I give you credit for, and thats not alot. What i find funny is I read blogs, and I see whites take a jab at blacks and blacks take a jab at whites, and when all of you idiots realize that he who has the golden egg's makes the golden rules. All they have to do is to continue to keep us divided, and from reading these blogs America is at stake, not from a woman president, or a black president, but because we are blinded by our own selfishness and hatreds, which is what is really destroying us.

bree   January 21st, 2008 1:39 pm ET

It isn't about "handling" the heat or "playing with the big boys" as I've seen it described. It's about using dirty tactics and the same old political trickery that has corrupted politics and embittered us to politics...it is exactly what Obama wants to change!!! His point is "Listen Hillary, if you really want to change and give America hope and unity that she so needs and wants right now, let's actually show that we CAN rise above these petty and self-centered political antics and genuinely campaign for America and for our party, the way our founding fathers would have been proud of".

Are we so far gone in simple, decent, genuine, that we can't even consider a campaign free of dirty and under-handed tactics legitimate??? THIS IS WHY WE NEED OBAMA!!!!!!!!!

mk   January 21st, 2008 1:38 pm ET

So who is Obama running against? Hillary, Bill, or both. She is a respectable candidate, she should be able to handle this on her own. What will she do when she is president? Will Bill be the "co president".

Jim   January 21st, 2008 1:38 pm ET

SHAME ON THE CLINTONS FOR DECEIVING US DURING THE NINTIES! SHAME ON US IF WE VOTE FOR THEM AGAIN!

adam   January 21st, 2008 1:38 pm ET

Christine Atlanta, Ga. said

"Michelle Obama is also out shooting her mouth off. Why not give that some press?"

I agree, give Michelle Obama some more press. It will only highlight the differences between her and Bill. She tells the truth and he doesn't.

I like and support a lot of the economic policies that (Bill) Clinton enacted while in office, but I am tired of the lies. I didn't inhale, I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Obama hasn't been consistent on the war, he doesn't have enough experience-these simply are not true. The problem with lies is that eventually they catch up with you. I just hope democrats are able to see through the lies quickly enough to not put their proverbial eggs in the Clinton basket. You can be sure that the republicans will see through them.

Joe   January 21st, 2008 1:38 pm ET

It is good that we have real choices this election , choices on positive things, not just who is less bad. A good primary based on ideas is good for the process. I have liked Hillary for a long time, from way back when she first made the scene as Bill's wife. I have come to like Obama.

However, Bill is out of control. I am looking for a sign that one of the traits Hillary would bring to the White House is the ability to control things. One of those things will be Bill.

If his present actions are an indication of what he will be like as First Husband, well talk about a loose canon causing damage. I would be scared as to how he could make it harder, if not destroy, the good Hillary would want to do. If she can't control him now, she won't be able to in the future. I want a President who has the control to get good things done, not damage control for an out of control spouse. I am going to watch to see if she can prove herself on this now.

Mo from Texas   January 21st, 2008 1:37 pm ET

Hmmm.....Why did CNN pick a picture of Obama throwing his hands up as if he's overwhelmed by the Clintons.? He's not whining, but handling both of them. CNN go ahead and give full disclosure and come out for Clinton overtly.

Matt in Indiana   January 21st, 2008 1:37 pm ET

I think Obama needs to stop whining and move on. His wife is out on the campaign trail just as well. Not to mention, he brought Oprah in on more than one occasion. If he can't handle the criticism of a former president how we will he handle that of foreign leaders?

Mike Ho-Yen   January 21st, 2008 1:37 pm ET

ON THE COMMENTS ABOUT THERACE BETWEEN CLINTON AND OBAMA NOT BEING ABOUT RACE OR GENDER

Do Americans believe that we are all ostriches? If it was not about race and gender, we would not see both candidates courting black/white or male/female voters. It would bea non-issue. Furthermore, if Hillary wins we would not expect any comments about her being the first woman president or in the case of Barack, no comments about him being the first black president. But we all know this won't happen. SO GO FOR IT. ADMIT ITS ABOUT RACE AND GENDER! BE ONEST FOR ONCE!

latiere   January 21st, 2008 1:37 pm ET

If Hillary Clinton wins the democrat nomination there will be another republican in the white house. The republicans want Hillary to win because they have soo much dirt on her from her stance on the war, watergate, and bill clinton's affair and the way he ran the white house. Don't forget under bill clinton we were attacked by Osama Bin Laden. He had a chance to get him but he let him go. Under bill clinton we went to war hence the afghanistan war, kuwait don't forget people. Voting for Hillary will also bring back his numerous amount of affairs. I look at Hillary and think is she going to be the president if she was voted into the white house or is bill. People who are voting democrat need to realize those facts when running against republicans especially John Mccain. If you don't want to vote Obama Vote Edwards because he already ran and all of his dirt is out there. Hillary is going to lose against the republicans.

Marty   January 21st, 2008 1:37 pm ET

I believe Clinton is the only President who has been disbarred from practising law for life.Quite the accomplishment.

kirikou   January 21st, 2008 1:35 pm ET

I think former President has a Personal Interest for this Election. It's obvious! He did find time to go and mess around with Intern at white house when he was busy dealing with the country's matters. Now figure out what he could do if he goes back to the White House with more free time and Hillary busy handling the country and getting us out of this economic mess!!!

No way! No Bill at white house again!!!

Marty   January 21st, 2008 1:34 pm ET

We didn't see George W's father coming out and making smears against Gore and Kerry.

If Mrs. Clinton is indeed, as she says, "Ready to be President on Day One" then she needs to not hide behind her husband, stand on her own two feet and fight.

But Bill seems to think he is the one running for Presidency. As psychiatrists would say he is "acting out."

Ralph   January 21st, 2008 1:34 pm ET

Republicans in NH were telling their Independant friends to vote for Obama because they can't wait to sink their teeth into him. The Republicans do not want the real, viable, Democratic candidate to run against them.

Brob   January 21st, 2008 1:33 pm ET

Funny!!! This is suppose to be a race for the Presidential Election. Yet, after reading some of your comments, I believe (A) either half of you no clue, (B) you dont know the facts, (C) you are prejudice, so know matter what is wrong, you wont see the truth.

Making excuses about running against the big boys, does not mean that the person running for President gets to have a powerful figure like an Ex-President do their dirty work. If Hillary cannot win this election on her own....then she doesnt deserve to win. In the beginning Bill wasnt saying anything because he thought she wouldnt have a tough time. But now, he is trying to divide and persuade the democratic party with half truths. He purposely says only half of what Obama says,,,which is a misquote.

Also, what is bad is Im tired of people winning based on who they are related to. Thats how we got the current President in office. This President race is more of the same because people are scared of change. Thats why America can never move ahead.

Patrick, New York,Ny   January 21st, 2008 1:33 pm ET

O and Hillary wasnt running against Oprah! Cry me a river Barack. You will be crushed by the Republicans if you win the nomination! What a sore loser!

Did he just notice Hillary and Bill are on the same side? He didnt seem to mention this when he was winning in Iowa!!

CLINTON 08!!

Mary   January 21st, 2008 1:32 pm ET

If Obama can't handle "running against both Clintons," where does he come up with the notion that he can handle the presidency of the most powerful country in the world?

PQ   January 21st, 2008 1:32 pm ET

To the American people: remember, you cannot trust the Clinton's. Please remember all the lies, scandals and cover ups of his presidency. He would say anything and do anything to get what he wanted. He might be charming. He might be a good public speaker. HOWEVER, they can't be trusted !

Kay in Cincinnati   January 21st, 2008 1:31 pm ET

If you want an AUTHENTIC person in the White House, choose Obama!
Nuff said.

cyndlilac   January 21st, 2008 1:30 pm ET

It is hard work putting an end to dynasty rule in America. Obama is the one candidate that will emerge as a founding leader in reforming our political system. American citizens are brave and capable of working together for the common good. A vote for Obama is a vote for progressive leadership that will translate to a secure future for all people. Hilary Clinton is a relic of by gone days.

docrock,tx   January 21st, 2008 1:30 pm ET

Let's see,Mrs.Obama can back-bite and trash the other candidates,Mrs.Edwards can spew hate and half truths,but Mr.Clinton cannot speak his mind?If this is not a double standard,I don't know what would be.Although I had not intended to vote for Hillary,I thank you for pushing myself and most of my friends into her camp.Who comes off as racist/sexist now all of you Obama,Edwards pundits.Either play fair or take the heat or,preferably,leave the race to those with vision for ALL,not pandering platitudes that deny plausibilities.Hillary'08

Lisa   January 21st, 2008 1:29 pm ET

He should have known he'd be up against both Clintons when he decided to run!

Ralph   January 21st, 2008 1:29 pm ET

Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, Bill is being mean to me Waaaaaaaaaaaaaa! Grow up Obama, wait to you see what the Republican Party has in store for you. They are praying you win, they smell fresh meat.

Annie   January 21st, 2008 1:29 pm ET

If Obama is a whinner because he says that he is having to fight both of the Clintons, then what does that say about Hillary, that needs to have her husband do the dirty work in order to break that last glass ceiling? That should not bode well with the women that broke the glass ceilings of the past with their own hard work and doing their own hard lifting and even the dirty work. Are they voting for a woman that needs her husbands influence to get the job?

Saundra Tucson   January 21st, 2008 1:29 pm ET

Clinton lies and Obama "makes mistakes". Check out the Rezco controversy in Chicago. It will give you a look at Obama and ethics.

Judith, Ridgewood, NJ   January 21st, 2008 1:28 pm ET

I have decided that if Clinton wins, I will vote Republican. It is so past time to move past the politics of descruction. If that's the only way Clinton HIll and Cinton Bill can win the nomination, they will not have my support.

Jason Smith   January 21st, 2008 1:28 pm ET

So much for experience...Bill Clinton is impeached, he has no business in politics...yet he is still out there slinging mud, while Hillary breaks down crying....

I wonder why Obama doesn't tell Hillary to go home because she is too emotional...

Maybe because he is of higher moral character....

Feminists must be ashamed...to have such a colossal mistake as Hillary be their best shot at the White House....she played the race card, the feminist card by crying, now she is playing the infidelity card on TV while her unfaithful husband is campaigning for her!!!!!!what a disgrace!!!!

Mike, Land O Lakes, FL   January 21st, 2008 1:28 pm ET

In a country with so many qualified candidates why are we insisting we have to choose presidents between two dishonest families bush->clinton->bush->clinton...Makes no sense!!!!!!!!!

hk   January 21st, 2008 1:28 pm ET

The only way Barack is going to win is if he unites people. Stick to your message Barack. Also, you need to do well in debates. You do great on the stump but when it comes to debates Hillary eats your lunch. I also agree that Bill Clinton is a huge asset for the Clinton campaign. But I think complaining about him is smart because that makes Obama the underdog in South Carolina which may get more support.

Obama '08

Brent Christopher   January 21st, 2008 1:28 pm ET

This is one of the ugliest primaries that I have seen. I would like to know if Obama wins the democratic ticket, will EX-President Bill Clinton stand behind Obama and endorse him even with all the terrible things that he has said about Obama or will he say that Obama is the candidate of choice by Americans and not his.

Too bad politics is not based on the candidates themselves and not what "big name" person supports who. Good grief! I am capable to determining for myself who I feel is the best candidate and don't need these people telling me how I should vote.

Let's let the candidates speak for themselves already.

Jr., California   January 21st, 2008 1:27 pm ET

Bush, Clinton, Bush, Clinton-

Definition of "insanity", .....doing the same thing over, and over again, expecting different results......

America, please do better than this.

Marty   January 21st, 2008 1:26 pm ET

We didn't see George W's father coming out and attacking Al Gore or John Kerry.

Bill Clinton has lost all perspective on this race. He's acting like he's in a time warp and it's 1992 all over again.

Bill, time to grow up and get out of the race. Let your wife fight her own battles.

krk, MN   January 21st, 2008 1:26 pm ET

at least he is not crying like Hillary

J   January 21st, 2008 1:26 pm ET

As someone who voted for Bill Clinton twice I will not support a democrat (beyond Barack) again. The way they have conducted themselves is beyond shame. They are embodying everything

Note to you Hillary backers – even if you win the primary (huge if by the way if we believe in the integrity and honor – look it up guys- I recognize you won't know what it means – are in the American people), please explain to me how you plan to win the general election when all of us independents (i.e. fair minded Americans who want what's best for the country as opposed to absurd identity politics, falsehoods and misstatements) sit the election out or vote for McCain or Romney in the general election.

As usual, the Clintonian paradigm – extremely short-sighted and selfish

enomisa   January 21st, 2008 1:26 pm ET

Unfortunately Obama is turning into another windbag blowing his own horn. Michelle hastens to defend him but I guess that is different. Obama's tactics have been nothing but dirty- stand-up comedy to mock Hillary- a woman who has served her country well. That's a uniter? A caucus held in the casinos where the employees on shift and available to caucus belong to the union that backs him- that is not an unfair advantage? Sounds like the bar is being lowered for the black candidate and no one wants to say it. I think He is doing nothing but dividing the party while presenting himself as the good guy. Sound familiar?

Chip Shirley   January 21st, 2008 1:25 pm ET

Huckabee only Republican at MLK in Atlanta?

It appears that way according to CNN. One of the main things that Republicans need to improve on is reaching out to the African American community. This appearance was a no-brainer for all the R' candidates. Maybe only Huckabee has the brains for this job.

deejay   January 21st, 2008 1:25 pm ET

However, Obama does have OPRAH ....it makes it a fair fight. OPRAH vs. the Clintons.....

Bill   January 21st, 2008 1:25 pm ET

If you can't stand the heat in the kitchen,get out. What would Obama do if the congress and senate were in the control of the republicans,would he accuse them of ganging up on him? Politics is a tough business,get use to it,Obama. I feel if he was elected, Washington would eat him up.......Get him 10 more yr and I think he'd be a great president...

mrland   January 21st, 2008 1:25 pm ET

Hey Clinton fans: gve us a break... it was Bill who was doing all the whining about Obama's supposed favorable media coverage. Go Barack!

Chris   January 21st, 2008 1:25 pm ET

I guess he thought since he won Iowa he was going to win it all. Now that he has lost 2 (3 if you include Michigan) he is getting his feelings hurt. Awwww. Poor Obama, do you need your diaper changed?

O.A.   January 21st, 2008 1:25 pm ET

The Clintons's need to be very careful with this win at all costs mentality that they have. Hillary is claiming that everyone will be united behind her if she wins the nomination, despite all the controversy over how she is winning some of these primaries. I am an educated African American male, and an ardernt supporter of Barack Obama. While the Clinton's claim to support issues important to members of my community and America as a whole, their smearing of Senator Obama, the first viable black candidate who is also running a very noble and honest campaign, has already made me decide to never vote for a Clinton again, because actions speak louder than words! Whether that means supporting a Republican, or a third party candidate remains to be decided. I am an Independent anyway, but even if registered as a Democrat there is no requirement to go with whoever the nominnee of that party is. Character is important too, not just experience!

Tony   January 21st, 2008 1:25 pm ET

Oh Cry Me A River!!! Obama claims Clinton is lying, but he does not say about what. If Clinton is distorting Obama’s record, then he should counter with the facts.

Maybe Clinton is right, and Obama knows it so he starts his whining.

Obama needs to grow up. Attacking ones Political Record is Politics 101. If you can’t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.

Jeez is Obama going to cry like a baby if he gets the nomination, and Republicans attack him?? LOL

archie h.   January 21st, 2008 1:24 pm ET

What a sideshow these dems put on lusting for power !

Marty   January 21st, 2008 1:23 pm ET

Obama – it's about time you fought back !

As Congressman Clyburn pointed out today, it will "toughen " you up.

There's a way to fight back and not play dirty.

This country needs a change.

Go, Obama !

JMarno   January 21st, 2008 1:23 pm ET

The democratic party is clearly split between Clinton and Obama. . .It would seem we want both? Obama-Clinton, Clinton-Obama!! Get out of the way!!

Dan T.   January 21st, 2008 1:22 pm ET

I'm in agreement with Sen Obama. I was a Bill Clinton supporter and voted for him 2 times. However, I don't agree with the one – two punch the Clintons are using on Obama. If they were battling in a playground in elementary school, this would be viewed as an unfair fight. When Sen. Clinton disagrees with anyone, she presents herself in a manner where she becomes difficult to watch. I understand she is defending herself, but her demeanor makes her less than affable. With Bill Clinton doing the dirty work, Sen. Clinton is fortunate enough to step away from it, and that is unfair. However, sadly, politics are very much unfair.

P.J. Hall   January 21st, 2008 1:21 pm ET

I was hoping that a question could be asked at the CBC debate tonight.

This is for myself and most of the nation in order to make a decision about which democratic candidate to really look at.

This question applies to Senator Clinton first, then to Senator Obama, finally To Mr. Edwards.

How many actual legislative years do you have in State Government and Federal Government? Actual time served.

Have you ever taught at any level, in any educational facility?

Thank you

P.J. Hall

spikyjazz   January 21st, 2008 1:20 pm ET

Who is running for president,Hillary or Bill?

Kevin   January 21st, 2008 1:20 pm ET

Some of these comments inititally suprised me how blind the American People are to the Clinton's political games. Then I remembered that Americans elected George W. Bush for a second term after they KNEW he stole the election from Al Gore. If your looking for experience, American Voters need to gain experience in looking past the Political B.S. and vote for someone who is right for the Nation.

Hillary would be a Lame Duck President, the Republicans will never work with another Clinton. Or did you forget Bill's 2nd term? They spent millions of dllars impeaching him instead of working on our problems. NOTHING has been done in the past 13 years in the Nation... and we are fools to think Hillary will bring anything but harder times and more controversy.

A President must be able to transcend party lines to bring the people together in a common cause and a belief of what is right and move our nation forward. Micro-management of the Nation is not an effective method of change. It takes more than experience of one Washington insider to bring change to America.
A President must have, not only the support of their own party, but the support of all political representatives. It is not the experience alone of a President that will bring about change; it is the experience of a Vice President; it is the experience of a well appointed Cabinet; it is the experience of 100 U.S. Senators, it is the experience of 435 U.S. Representatives; it is the experience of 50 Governors, it is the experience of thousands of state legislators, it is the experience of all elected officials coming together across party lines – understanding their sworn commitment to serve the people they represent. People must change before nations can change. I am challenging the people across America to call for real change. Change their hearts, change their priorities and change their expectations of their elected officials. America is not a nation of Dynasties; it is a nation of the people, by the people and for the people.

An OBAMA Presidency will restore the dignity and respect for our nation around the world.

Dorothy   January 21st, 2008 1:18 pm ET

Spouses are passionate. I heard Michelle tell Alina Cho in an interview, that if you can't run your own house you can't run the white house. No one has said anything about this mix of words. I think Hillary ran her house just fine, with forgiveness and strength. And Chelsea turned out to be a fine young woman, which Michelle seemed not to acknowledge. It seems the words Clinton says are the only ones under a microscope. Some one should tell that to chris Matthews, whom I used to think was the last of the objective journalists.

john   January 21st, 2008 1:17 pm ET

Obama, grow up. You parse language worse than Bill Clinton. Stop intellectualizing everything and stop preaching. It's about action, not words.

RuthieM   January 21st, 2008 1:17 pm ET

This is going to get dirtier and dirtier. I heard Bill Clinton say the other day on tv to ignore his image as former president that he is going door to door in South
Carolina. Since he is telling folks to 'ignore his image as president' then I think Michelle Obama should be out there doing what Bill Clinton is doing against Obama. I think Michelle Obama needs to start attacking Bill Clinton and distorting Hillary Clinton's record, if she can find any record on her, and let Obama stay on message, the same message that Clinton has stolen from him, is now running away with it and plans to win with. Apparently, nothing is too low for these Clintons, lying and cheating all the way. And someone needs to face to face with Clinton telling him he is no 'first black president' because he wasn't and isn't. Where is Toni Morrison who dubbed Bubba that in the first place? Good grief!!!

DA   January 21st, 2008 1:17 pm ET

All Obama is trying to do is to expose the Clintons for what they are, Liers!!
At least he is taking his licks like a man and not shedding any crocodile tears!!!!!!!!!!

gabriela de la peña   January 21st, 2008 1:16 pm ET

gimme a break!!! if you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen...

Ms. Kennedy   January 21st, 2008 1:16 pm ET

Billary is only ahead because of her husband credentials check your facts.

Just Say No to HillBillery!   January 21st, 2008 1:16 pm ET

Come on people, we've seen enough of these two... Gak!
Sorry Bill, you can't serve another term!
Obama 08 – 100% Authentic

Nestor, Pembroke Pines, FL   January 21st, 2008 1:15 pm ET

It seems that Obama's campaign is showing they are not ready to the kind of fight politicians have to go through when they become the President of the most powerful country in the world.

So what if President Clinton is backing up his wife, his partner, the running mate for the DNC and he's an old fox when it comes to dealing with politics. It's a pity that Mr. Axelrod does not have anything else to say that express his frustration for losing this internal race.

Sal   January 21st, 2008 1:14 pm ET

Nobody likes a whiner.

Justin Tyme   January 21st, 2008 1:14 pm ET

I think it is a fair battle – 2 against 1. Just goes to show you how strong of a candidate Obama is and how much of a threat the Clintons see him as, they probably don't get sleep at night over Obama.

Unfortunate for Hillary, she's going to need more than Bill to bring Obama down. She should have Chelsea help out too...

texan girl   January 21st, 2008 1:14 pm ET

sunnyday, before you write learn how to spell. The word is choice not chose.

obama 08

mike   January 21st, 2008 1:14 pm ET

Mr Obama,

What were you sayiing when you had Oprah with you, If you can not stand the heat get out, before we run out of kleenex.

Mike

Brady   January 21st, 2008 1:13 pm ET

If people can't see what a manufactured fake the Clintons are, people are just plain stupid. The Clintons are the Bonny and Clyde of politics. I'd take Bush anyday over these two clowns.

Bill Clinton's misuse of the White House for his "non-sexual relations" should be enough to let people know what they are all about. The fact Hillary put up with it shows you clearly that glory and power is more important. Most normal women would have divorced their husbands. In Hillary's case, she knows she can't accomplish her selfish goals if she had divorced and left Bill. She is nothing without Bill.

Seriously, this isn't the election of Hillary Clinton, but the re-election of Bill Clinton.

Hopefully, Obama can survive the corruption of these two people.

AK democrat   January 21st, 2008 1:13 pm ET

Looks like the Clinton's learned their lesson from Gore's defeat in 2000 – do whatever it takes to get the power. Problem is, that they're turning into a mini-version of the Republicans with these 'ruthless' measures.

Honestly, Hillary is less electable than Obama. There are millions on the right who hate her guts. She's very much divisive and will never be able to unite the country. In this sense she is the Democratic version of Bush. So, yeah, if we want four (or eight) more years of blue against red, let's go ahead and vote her into office.

While Obama might not have Hillary's experience, at least he is in theory capable of bringing the country together, something that Clinton can never achieve, no matter how hard she'll try.

I never thought I'd say this, but I have to seriously consider if I vote Democratic if she gets the nomination. I might rather not vote at all.

Shotz   January 21st, 2008 1:12 pm ET

I voted for Bill Clinton in both 1992 and 1996.I was undecided in the Democratic primaries until his performance during the NH primary (the "fairytale" speech) and several additional incidents over the past few weeks, especially in the Nevada primary.

Bill now turns my stomach and is a complete negative for me to vote for Hillary. I am now supporting Obama. If Clinton is the nominee....I'll vote for McCain.

There is just no way I can stomach 4 (or 8) more years of Bill Clinton. No way.

ardleighstreet   January 21st, 2008 1:12 pm ET

...Whine "Mom they're picking on me."

If he is this THIN skinned; I will hate to see how he takes ...the press, SNL or Daily Show, and the American people once we get ahold of you. No offense but there is no crying or whining in politics. If the Kitchen of American politics is too hot Mr Obama best you step out now before you become the President. That is not a position we tend play nice with. If you think the Clintons are bad I eagerly await your reaction to say Lewis Black or Jon Stewart telling you the facts.

Disgusted Expat   January 21st, 2008 1:11 pm ET

As an expat to the States, I must say that U.S. politics has left me with a bad taste. The refusal, or reluctance, of U.S. citizens to do their own research is simply dissapointing and the ability of politicians and news outlets to manipulate the fickle populace continues to astound me.

This is the only country in which people vote for brands or parties over substance. Does anyone think for him or herself?
I admire the ability to continually compare candidates against one's preset criteria until the minute before the vote is cast. No candidate should have votes "in the bag" several weeks or months in advance. These campaigns are akin to cults, in many cases. While the Obamas aren't perfect, I have had cause to view recent Clinton sound bites with suspicion.

Rob   January 21st, 2008 1:11 pm ET

I thought Bill Clinton was a good President, but in the last year of his Presidency, he showed his true character. He is a liar, an adulterer and lacks real moral character – shown by his arrogance and true lack of remorse! I for one do not want him back in the White House. He disgraced the Presidency and caused great turmoil for the Country. He must of at times taken his 'eye off the ball' because he had all the personal issues to deal with.
So the question is – how much of a role will he play in Hillary's Presidency, if she is elected? His track record says he's a womanizer.....he hasn't changed his spots or character. Why would we want him back in the White House on any level? He helped get GW elected because the Country wanted someone moral!
There will be no change with the Clintons in office. It will be politics as usual. She has taken too much $$$ money from Corporations and Lobbyists. They owe people and they feel people owe them. I have lost all respect for them.

bacalove   January 21st, 2008 1:11 pm ET

The Clintons have intentionally distorted Barack Obama's record on a number of issues. Example, Hillary's recent statement she made on Meet the Press in which she said: "Sen. Obama's chief strategist accuses me of playing a role in Benazir Bhutto's assassination." When in actuality David Axelrod never made such an accusation. He said former Prime Minister Bhutto's death will "call into issue the judgment" of "taking the eye off the ball and making the wrong judgment in going into Iraq." Then recently Bill Clinton completely distorted Obama's remarks he made about Reagan and Republicans and twisted it to say that Obama had said no Democrats had any good ideas. And Obama's opposition stance on the Iraq war, that he has been against from Day One, while Hillary had voted Yes. And, are these people of high principal and moral character and want to run the White House?

The American people are tired of politicians who lie and distort their opponent's records to gain the edge. Our politicians should be held to a higher standard. We should have politicians who are honest and above tactics that are unethical, irresponsible, misleading and dishonest - who lack principals and are willing to do anything to win. After all most of us teach our children to be honest, ethical and not to lie. How can we have trust in our leaders to be frank with us when they have not been honest and ethical on the campaign trail. Politicians who intentionally lie, distort and mislead are in all honesty not honorable people, and basically unethical - not the kind of people we should want to run or represent our country.

I can only hope that Barack Obama will not stoop down to their level while trying to set his record straight, which he must, against the lies and distortion their campaign are trying to get into the American psyche. These tactics are old time party politics and should be a thing of the past as we move towards the 21st Century, towards cleaner air, cleaner water, cleaner politics, towards a more holistic way of living. It is a greater duty and in the best interest of the country for Barack Obama to continue to stay positive and hopeful while attempting to bring this country together and lift it up from fear an a distrust of one another - to continue to show the American people and the world there is another way to run for office other than smear and fear. That is why Obama and Huckabee are so appealing. They are authentic and each in their own way are trying to lead the Americans away from dirty campaigning, lies and tricks. How can a country be blessed after all that ugly and dirty fighting, it can't be. And too we have to ask ourselves as a people, why do we allow this behavior to be acceptable and reward this kind of negative behavior, when we would not accept it in ourselves.

Angela   January 21st, 2008 1:08 pm ET

Bill and Hillary remind me of the tactics of the former segregationist governor of Alabama–George Wallace. When George could not serve as Governor for more than two consecutive terms, he had his wife Lurleen run after his eight years in office. She won and served for four years and then he ran again and won. I guess some people have a hard time giving up the power once they have it. I saw an article from the late 80's that after Bill's several terms as Governor of Arkansas, Hillary considered a run for Governor, but decided against it because of the negative response she received.

sunnyday   January 21st, 2008 1:08 pm ET

Mr. Obama you should have know that this would not be easy , like the old saying " if you can't stand the heat in the kitchen, get out". Your whining and complaining is becoming tiresome. You think this is bad, if you become the democratic chose, wait until the other side lash out. "Beef up" and get a grip!

Pat   January 21st, 2008 1:08 pm ET

Dr. Michael Maccoby recently said,

"Candidates in the primaries argue about whether experience or leadership for change is more important for a president. What I learned when I spoke at Google headquarters in Mountain View, California last month is that the young professionals there recognize that profound social change is already taking place. They want leaders at work and in Washington who understand the evolving world and make them collaborators in creating a better future. Experience without foresight and purpose is a drag, not a value."

Tim Zrodlowski   January 21st, 2008 1:06 pm ET

Bill has been acting terrible and I will change my vote for Obama. I am looking at the facts I personally don't care about a middle name. I was looking both at Hillary and Obama but, now I will be voting for Obama.

Thomas - Reno, NV   January 21st, 2008 1:06 pm ET

The Clinton practice has always been to say things over and over again and they will eventually become the truth. It's like chanting a mantra, you start to actually believe what you are chanting after awhile.

I did respect Bill as president, but his attacks are ruthless, calculated, and completely misstated. There are no facts to back up his attacks, and yet you Clinton robots consistently believe and repeat the same garbage that comes out of his mouth. Garbage in equals garbage out.

I encourage any undecideds to research the facts before heading the words of a ruthless politician that will do anything to keep his legacy alive. Listen to the distinct differences of the ME ME ME Clinton's and the US US US Obama, Edwards, and Kucinich folks.

Eric DeGroot   January 21st, 2008 1:06 pm ET

Sour grapes. Can't win on his own campaigning so blames someone else. Maybe he should start talking about something of substance instead of sounding like a lecturer in philosophy class. We need a thinker and a doer, like the Clinton's, not just a dreamer who can speak well.

ellen   January 21st, 2008 1:06 pm ET

Maybe the answer is not to allow anyone but the candidate to campaign. I understand that Mr. Obama is upset but he himself employed Oprah Winfrey as a spokes person and I'm sure Oprah is way more popular than Bill Clinton. Hillary probably felt like he does.

AC   January 21st, 2008 1:04 pm ET

Of course Bill wants her to win. He's imagining everything he'll be able to do with whoever he wants in the White House, WITHOUT the responsibility of being president.
He knows you can't impeach a first man.

larry   January 21st, 2008 1:04 pm ET

this is why we truely do need a candidate for "change". Again, we have the dirty tricksters of politics at their very best. Say anything... do anything to get elected because by the time people come out of the ether and realize what the truth really is... we'll be elected! Does Slick Willy really understand he cannot serve another term as President, and do the people supporting his wife believe anything else is really going on here? Carl Rove would be proud of you, Billyboy!

Julie Rejcek   January 21st, 2008 1:03 pm ET

Bob Johnson should have cleaned up Bet before he left, I would not want him for a spokesperson and by the way this Honor Harvard Graduate which you probably also are , tried drugs when was a kid. I am more concerned what he has done as an Adult
etc...Harvard Alum...I feel he can bring change for this country. It shows that the most educated are voting for Barack and uneducated voting for Hillary, check your facts. Maria do you have a law degree like Michelle while you're saying she can't pronounce the states????

Obama 08

GO HILLARY GO !!!   January 21st, 2008 1:02 pm ET

The people will see through you Obama...

You have nothing to offer, other then good speeches. Unfortunately, that is not enough to become President.

Geri Sacramento   January 21st, 2008 1:02 pm ET

Man, Obama, you're starting to look REALLY bad.

Paul, CA   January 21st, 2008 1:02 pm ET

When Hillary whines we are told to not be mean to the girl. When Obama speaks clearly about a serious issue such as Bill spinning truth (he is a genius at creative truth) some say "stop whining"? I sincerely hope the Democratic party implodes on the weight of their need for fairness.

Iife ain't fair. Get over it.

Of course Bill is going to be Bill – charming, well spoken, bald face liar – it's BILL CLINTON people.

Andthe so-called Reagan flap? Obama simply stated the truth. He didn't claim to be a fan he simply stated a fact. Most of you need to pay attention to words, they mean something.

Obama's best direction is to ignore the Clinton-istas and full speed ahead with a message of change. Sadly I don't know if he can.

As a lifelong Republican and now Libertarian who votes mostly conservative, if it turned out that it were McCain vs. Obama, I would vote for Obama.

Ann, MO   January 21st, 2008 1:02 pm ET

It is true that all candidates spouses are on the campaign trail for their candidate, but the fact that Bill Clinton was the President of the United States garners him and his remarks much more time in front of the cameras. He did not respect the Office of the Presidency while he was in office and lied under oath, stared straight into the camera and lied to all of us, and committed sins against his own wife. Now, he is doing the dirty work of the Clinton campaign so that his wife can look soft.

How is this Presidency going to work if Hillary wins. Is he the one that is going to be running the office and the country or is she? It certainly looks like he is running the campaign, while she is having tea, so is he the one that will be running the country and talking to foreign leaders while she is having tea with their wives.

I thought that Hillary was running on the fact that she has "experience" and was going to lead the woman of this country in the breaking that final glass ceiling, but the women that have broken all of those previouse glass ceilings did it on their own, not hiding behind their husbands.

barb r   January 21st, 2008 1:01 pm ET

Just what is all this experience Hilary brags about? Thc Clinton's seem to have a theory that if you keep repeating it, it will be so, e.g. "I did not..." I am a republican who plans to change to vote for Obama

I am a female, over 60, wasp and think Obama is a breath of fresh air.

How can Clinton's change anything when they are recycling the same old cronies. Clinton will insure that congressional votes will continuie to split along party lines. For the sake of the country I h ope Obama wins big so we might have a united country. We have had "experienced" and look where we are.

Barb R

Dusacre   January 21st, 2008 1:00 pm ET

The devil himself can come and vote for Hillary, He may even bring all his armies. All that will not matter. Hillary will not be the next president of the United States.

Bill Clinton may yell at reporters, he may even bark. All that will not matter. Hillary will not be the next president of the United States.

Marketer and political strategists may repackage Hillary Clinton and sell her to us. All that will not matter. Hillary will not be the next president of the United States.

All Clinton supporters can vote for her as long as they want; All that will not matter. Hillary will not be the next president of the United States.

Why?

Americans in the vast majority are people with a good judgment. They know and see what the Clintons are.

Obama just came into money   January 21st, 2008 12:59 pm ET

The Obamas are brand spanking new to money. He admitted himself to Russert that in a few years he will be too far gone from the lower class. The Obamas just got book money and just recently bought a very large home. It's all brand new to them. Yeah, he's a great speaker, but that's it. He is a freshman. He will make mistakes and his campaign will crumble.

Ralph Grimaldi   January 21st, 2008 12:59 pm ET

Senator OBama had been warned that his main advessary is the one with the longest knife in this game corectly identified by Vince Foster a compatroit of Hillary as a "Bloodsport". The tall gentleman from Ilinois who has demonstrated in a convincing way his ability to give and accept the tenets of civilized behavior with out qualification.and demonstrated the courage but the sillyness to acquire an atractive wife cpable of an intelligence and class that eaual his undoubted also has the gonads to take his stand in any arena.

As Genifer Flowers said, 'you would have thought the former president would have learned by now". Go forth my friend from Chicago knowing those living on a more humane part of the planet are on your side.

Jen   January 21st, 2008 12:58 pm ET

Former Clinton's actions remind me of why he got the nickname "slick willy", I was leaning towards Hillary's direction however i find it insulting to play the woman card trying to lure my vote and I'm not sure who i would be voting for anymore Hillary or Slick Willy. Obama just got my vote.

J Pharao   January 21st, 2008 12:58 pm ET

It's becoming more like a fight between David and Goliath. I could clearly see the prophetic outcome of this fight. Senator Obama only needs to remain focused and courageous. The Clintons could seem invincible now, but watch them after February 5th. One last point: It's so disgusting to watch a former president get so dirty!

Mary Miles   January 21st, 2008 12:56 pm ET

What has happened your Mrs. – Senator Obama? It seems not so long ago you almost had to muzzle her. The words "pushy" and "uppity" come to mind. Why shouldn't Hillary engage Bill as an advocate? It's unfortunate your spouse is abrasive to the general public, but don't fault the Clintons for their loyalty to one another. If your own family can't be your biggest supporters – then who ??

Marie in Arlington Tx   January 21st, 2008 12:56 pm ET

Whinning?????? Don't think so. Obama is simply stating the obvious. If he or Edwards try (what does Hillary say?) to "contrast differences" they are ganging up on poor Hillary.

Hillary crying in New Hampshire...Bill whinning about voter irregularities in Nevada...now that is whinning. Don't foget Bill roughing up a reporter on the subject of the lawsuit on caucus sites in Nevada. Those would be your crybabies!!!!!!!

How stupid do the Clinton's think we are that we don't recognize their lying, dirty politics. Obama is trying to run a positive campaign and they are trying to drag him down to their level. This talk of it "not being Obama's time"....it is Hillary's time. Don't think so!!!! America can't afford 4 more years of divisive politics. She is not entitled to the office of President just because she stood by her man. Even Bill can't deliver that for her.

Obama 08!

Bill   January 21st, 2008 12:54 pm ET

Obama should just talk about his agenda and his vision for America,forget about the Clintons,please.

Rakesh Kochhar   January 21st, 2008 12:54 pm ET

The Clinton's were not born to become Presidents...this is not Pakistan (Bhutto) or India (Gandhi) where all it takes is a name. The world is in need of leadership and the US needs so desperately to win its Global credibility back, and all we are left to read is the race issue, or he did this and she said that. By god, does anymore realize the importance of chance and the critical forces that have made this planet so fragile...economically, the environment, extremism, etc.

My question to the candidates at tonights debates...What will be your first foreign policy priority and specifically their views on Pakistan?? After all according to the Economist – Pakistan has now been labeled the MOST DANGEROUS PLACE IN THE WORLD.

Secondly, I would ask their understanding of the sub-prime vows and what fiscal and monetary policy from the previous administration resulted to the debacle and what they feel is the solution that will minimize risk and maximize return.

Rakesh

PS…I fist saw Mr. Obama on your network when he was the keynote speaker at the DNC in Boston. I have read all I can/could about him. If ever there was a time that not only the US but this globe needs leadership…now is the time and Obama is for real. It’s just sad that the Clinton’s are turning so negative…it is not Obama’s fault that the Clinton’s have already ordered the furniture and carpets for the White House.

Julie Rejcek   January 21st, 2008 12:54 pm ET

Why do you all keep mentioning his middle name, that is a very bias tactic and shows how really uneducated you are in this matter. He was named after a father who he never knew, who went to pursue a Doctor of Philosphy, (PhD) at Havard where also Obama was a Honor Graduate. Barack grew up with his white mother and her parents, he would discredit his family for the race card again he never knew his father side. Let's stay with the facts and be true to thy self. Im sorry I never saw George Bush Sr acting the way Bill has been in Hillary campaign. I also will vote republican if she makes the nomination.

obama 08

Independent   January 21st, 2008 12:52 pm ET

Just take them both off the ballot for conduct unbecoming citizens of the United States of America.

Fridith S. Holloway   January 21st, 2008 12:52 pm ET

I have to agree with Barak Obama on this one. Hillary is only where she is because her last name is Clinton and her husband's name is Bill. I believe Bill and Hillary have been planning her running for office since Bill took office as President. There whole marriage is a political instituiton. Obama is not complaining but instead pointing out a fact, Bill Clinton is doing the drity work while Hillary tries to be "REAL" by putting on this facade of being a kind-hearted woman blah, blah, blah, well, I have to give it up for those two because they know how to play politics well...however this is not a game, this is about people's lives...This is the change that Obama is talking about, he is honest and has a positive uplifting campaign, and Billary are running a tag team bad cop/ good cop campaign, its sickening...Bill I respected you until now... Obama, the good and truth will always prevail! Obama for President!

If Billary wins the democratic nomination, I will not be able to vote for them in the general election...I am a republican and I will not vote for any of those candidates either, so it will either have to be a third party candidate or no vote at all and I think there are many people that feel the same!
God Bless America, God Bless Barack Obama and his family!

Ace   January 21st, 2008 12:52 pm ET

It's a normal part of politicking. You get as many members of your family to hit the bricks and talk up the name. The Kennedys were the best because there were so many of them. The Carters, The Bushes, The Gores, all sent their family members out on the trail. My golly, Bill and Chelsea are only two people.

It BHO wants to he can ask his family of brothers, sisters, in-laws to campaign on his behalf.

lynne   January 21st, 2008 12:52 pm ET

The Clintons had their chance in the White House – and it was not all pretty, although many democrats seem to have forgotten that....they are a power hungry couple if I ever saw one. He will be a liablity to Hillary if she ends up in the White House. Not to mention that the best thing that could happen to the Republican party would be for Hillary to get the nomination. Talk about uniting Republicans, and many independants! I have never voted for a Republican, but if Hillary wins the nomination, I just might have to. All the talk these days is about wanting "change" – Hillary is a life time politician who is as entrenched in the Washington political establishment as anyone running – she is not my definition of change by any stretch. It actually appeals to me that Obama has not been in Washington for as long – maybe he is a little less "corrupted" than the others!

The Truth   January 21st, 2008 12:51 pm ET

"I DID NOT HAVE SEXUAL RELATIONS WITH THAT WOMAN!!!" – Bill Clinton.
Both Clintons are liars!

angelina_ MN   January 21st, 2008 12:50 pm ET

For the females, who support Clinton, so you want the example set for your daugthers and your sons, that is OK to cheat on your wife, while in the highest office in this country and for your daugthers that is OK, to put up with it as long as you get some political and economic advancement out of it, even if it means decades later?
While it is great and historical that a female runs for office, it is not good that it is this way, nor that is is a woman who gets there because of her cheating husband and not her own efforts. THat is not what Feminism is about, nor what women in 2008 want to pass to their daugthers or sons. I am sorry but the HILLBILLYs are done, their term is over, that era is gone.
Be honest, yes support an honest and woman full of integrity who does not n eed to run on her husband's ticket, who does not have to insult the other candidates or cry to get the attention of some women, or sympathy of some people, who uses AA and other minorities to her advantage. If she and Bill truly supported what they say they do as far as civil rights and advancement, would they both be the first ones to step out of the race and let those who have not had the chance in office, run? NO not Hillary she is about power and control just ask Bill.

J. Dean, Juno Beach, FLORIDA   January 21st, 2008 12:49 pm ET

WHILE IN THE WHITE HOUSE FOR 8 LONG YEARS, HILLARY WAS UNABLE AND, PROBABLY, UNWILLING TO MANAGE BILLY CLINTON. SHOULD WE NOMINATE HILLARY AND SHOULD WE ELECT HILLARY, BILLY AND HILLARY IN THE WHITE HOUSE ARE VERY BAD COMBINATION.
THIS WILL BE A DISASTER FOR THE DEMOCRATES AND DISASTER FOR AMERICA AT LARGE.
BILLY DID GOOD JOB AS A PRESIDENT. IT WILL BE HIGHLY ADVISABLE THAT HILLARY STAYS IN THE SENATE.
LET OBAMA AND RUMNEY BATTLE FOR THE WHITE HOUSE. BOTH ARE SUPERM CANDIDATES FOR THE JOB.

Mindy Chatsworth, California   January 21st, 2008 12:49 pm ET

Harry Truman said it best – If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen. He was referring to the presidency, but it applies just as well to politics. It's time for Barack Obama to stand up and take the heat. The news media have given him a free pass thus far, not subjecting him to the kind of tough questions that all of the other candidates have had to deal with in this campaign.

If Obama can't handle Bill Clinton, then he isn't ready for the presidency. What does he think the Republicans will do to him if he gets elected? Hold his hand? Wish him well? He could ask Bill Clinton what it was like to deal with a hostile Republican Congress. He could ask Bill Clinton how it felt when he pushed through his tax increase and not one Republican voted for it. It took someone with his superb, brilliant political skills and toughness to stand his ground and fight for the programs he wanted.

It's time for Obama to stop whining and complaining and show what he's got. Does he have the courage, strength and fortitude to be president? This country is faced with enormous problems right now and we need someone who can come in and get the job done, not sit around crying to the media when others don't play nice. Bill Clinton has every right to question Obama's record and programs and ideas. That's what the media should be doing, but they have been napping of late. Now if they would just wake up and start putting Obama to the test, then maybe Bill Clinton would not have to do it for them.

Jennifer   January 21st, 2008 12:49 pm ET

I am a voter that is currently split right down the middle of Obama and Hilary. But, I cant help but think that Obama is being a bit childish here. Come on, this is politics. If you dont like the way things are being run against you, then bite back, but do it tastefully.

I wonder if he has considered his wife going door to door for him? Just a thought.....

Anna   January 21st, 2008 12:48 pm ET

Why did Hillary refuse to take her name off the Michigan primary ballot? All the other candidates followed the party rules and removed their names. Not her. She calculated it was better for the press to show her with a vote total, which looks like a "win" than to follow the rules. Just like Bill, there are two sets of rules, one for the Clintons and one for everyone else. She can always explain it away, because she calculates that the public gets too bored with details anyway. If she wins, all thinking Americans lose.

NoWhining   January 21st, 2008 12:48 pm ET

Obama is crying foul now that he's losing, when he knows he started this "below the waist" tactic by distorting the Clintons' record on civil rights and affirmative actions. He should have known better than to bring up race as an issue, when we all know someone with the right credentials and experience would not need to go this route.

It's time for the experienced candidates who do not whine, but will step up to the plate when the going gets tough. Obama will get his chance to be president, but not this coming elections. He needs more years in government, gathering a longer trail of voting record and to prove his leadership before he can be one of the leaders of the world.

cobra   January 21st, 2008 12:48 pm ET

Almost everyone knows that the Clintons are proven liars!!

Frank J. (MO)   January 21st, 2008 12:48 pm ET

JB January 21, 2008 9:29 am ET

Doesn't Obama understand that "being up against both Clintons" is a great reason to vote for Hillary. Their team, Hillary as President and Bill as a capable advisor, makes an extremely strong force leading our country. Everyone will feel the same way – foreign governments, congress, etc…

If Obama can't handle it, how will he handle the role of president?

JB, you are one of those who believe that a president does not have to be capable by him/herself ... the first female President should not have to rely on her husband to make the decisions. What kind of situation is that ?

Frank

Reco Davis   January 21st, 2008 12:48 pm ET

It is obvious that Team Hillary supporters are using the argument that Obama is a complainer everytime he fights back against the allegations of the Clinton. Some have even called it whining.

With all due respect, this is a weak argument. Obama should fight back at every chance he gets against the false accusations of Bill and Hillary. Should he stand back and allow his reputation to be sullied? Surely we don't want a pushover for a President.

As an Obama supporter, I'm glad the he has finally decided to also take on Bill head to head. Many of us were Bill supporters, and I have to say, now I can at least understand some of the negative sentiments other held toward him.

I was simply glad he was winning when he was on my team. Now I see the Clinton's in quite a different light. I still respect them, but at this point I really think they're time has passed.

No it is not time for change. It is time for transformation! ...And the closest we're getting to that this election is Obama!

Go Obama '08!

Mr. Bromont   January 21st, 2008 12:47 pm ET

For those who see how the light is shining brightly for Barack Obama, thank you for your intelligence. For those who see how the light is showing how the Clintons are looking like those rats we saw in the New York KFC restaurant ,what is wrong with you people. Oh and another thing about those calling Barack Obama a whiner (How soon we forget) who was sniffiling and showing tears after what happened to her in Iowa and before New Hamshire. Let's all show some good thinking and relize Obama would be the better and greater choice of being the next President of the United States of America. The divisive tatics of all of the rest of the candidates shame,shame,shame.

debg   January 21st, 2008 12:47 pm ET

Yes you ARE !! My young one ! Get used to it ! Two heads are always better than one. What's wrong? Are you embarrassed about YOUR partner? You two are not the power couple that the Clinton's are? So what...Michelle doesn't pronounce Nevada correctly at a most important time! She reminds me of Bush. Some people just can' t talk right...So..If ya can't hang with the Big Dogs...
Besides..I think it's a good thing. Bill Clinton (and Hillary) is brilliant! And at least when they are having an afternoon delight; it will not be cheating–the bastard! He's one of the lucky ones...his wife allowed him to stay in her life!

Jack Letts Baltimore, MD   January 21st, 2008 12:46 pm ET

I was struck the day Billy offered up the "fairytale" idea and so I did check Obama's votinr record. Maybe you should check it out.When the tough votes came down. Hillary showed up and checked in. Obama was probably on NPR or Oprah that day.
I knew this guy would start whining if he fell behind. Just what this country needs another whinin, cryin "nobody understands me" kind of guy for president. Please. Hillary shows up for work, she always has. Who among you are not as oppporatunistic as the next guy when it comes to getting ahead in the world. How many of you have asked someone of influence to put in a good word for you on you behalf. We all like to have someone at our backs. The Clintons haven't done much of anything to get ahead as most business folk. But they did....reduce the budget, try to protect families (The family leave act), keep us out of wars, and TRY to get us a better healthcare system. Look that stuff up.

Rose   January 21st, 2008 12:46 pm ET

Oh come on! Grow up. This is primary campaign. It''s the nature of the beast. Get over it!

Pat -Ottawa-   January 21st, 2008 12:46 pm ET

Obama needs to this-he needs to fight back b/c he definitely is getting bullied-I'm not American but I wish we some leaders in Canada that have Obama's personality and demeanor-the man will be like everywhere -I strrongly believe that Obama should be America's voice of the future

Tired of the Clintons   January 21st, 2008 12:46 pm ET

The fact is, the Clintons have always been destructive to the Democratic party. Let's not forget that they have a lot to do with the democrats losing the congress in 1994, when Hillary ruined our best chance at nationalizing health care. The Clintons only care about the Clintons. They will do and say anything to win even if it means taking money from big corporations and lobbyists or destroying another candidate with lies. Anyone who thinks they want to advance the democrats is fooling themselves. The party has been suffering from their destruction ever since Bill left office. What's ironic is that now when we finally have a chance to move the democrats forward and win the White House and they will screw it up.

Tony, Enterprise, Alabama   January 21st, 2008 12:45 pm ET

So what does Senator Obama want to happen?

Are former President Clinton and Mrs. Michelle Obama going to be banished from the respective campaigns? Give me a break!

Stop whining! You're not in nursery school, elementary, junior high or high school; you're not even in college. This is the big time, and if you can't stand the heat get out of the kitchen!

What a loser!

James   January 21st, 2008 12:45 pm ET

I was at a meeting last night, hours before this reporting, the hot topic of Obama vs Clinton's was on the table, so it is surely an issue under debate.

Some suggested that if you think this race is about Hillary, your painfully mistaken, this is Bills, under the radar seat at the table of US power, that is why Hillary talks about 35 years of experience, that was not based on leadership, simply experience.

Bill has, as governor, and as president with a proven track record that helped minorities get a chance at the American dream, not Hillary and it showed when she didn't break ranks, presenting leadership when it was needed, to help Congress investigate the Florida elections debacle, by simply voicing approval for it.

So I question her sincerity, that she will go against the grain of the inner circle, when push comes to shove, and the American people, especially minorities are on the other end of scale that is never balanced.

Thanks

James (Los Angeles)

Feed up in IL   January 21st, 2008 12:45 pm ET

I been trying to tell people, Obama has never had a competior. He ran against Alan Keys for God Sakes!! And he cheated his way into the State Senate. If he wants to go against Superwomen he better bring his Kryptonite. He needs to stop whinning.

GP Geneseo Il   January 21st, 2008 12:44 pm ET

Please Obama, stop your whining....it is beginning to look like you took lessons from Gov. Blago.....

I'm an Independent voter and trust me, I think I will run away from the Republican vote...I sure don't want a continuance of what we have had the last 7 years...

Brenda   January 21st, 2008 12:44 pm ET

Mr. Obama should stop whinning about the Clinton's. What is he going to do if he becomes President and it gets heat? Whine that he cannot do international politics, because a certain country does not like him. Grow up Senator!!!

tmd   January 21st, 2008 12:44 pm ET

Bill Clinton distorting the truth? Say it isn't so! How can anyone think Hillary would be a strong president when her husband has to fight her battles for her? If she can't control him now, what will happen if she's elected?

gabrielfabry   January 21st, 2008 12:44 pm ET

Democrate Rocks !

Tina Whitfield   January 21st, 2008 12:43 pm ET

Thanks for the tantrum of inexperience Obama. We can see John McCain and the Clinton camp chuckling at this.

christy   January 21st, 2008 12:42 pm ET

the Clinton campaign looks like yet another attempt at Nepotism to me. I thought this was a democratic country,– whats wrong with us. If it looks like a duck and walks like a duck--------

Frank J. (MO)   January 21st, 2008 12:42 pm ET

Samantha Klein January 21, 2008 9:16 am ET

Obama is running for President. Maybe he needs to learn how to play with the big boys. Whining isn't the way.

Samantha, 'whining' is that not what your Billary Clinton used to rally women in NH after she was told that she had to show emotions to get the votes out ?

Constructive critizicm is not to be confused with 'whining' like 'I just don't want this country to fall back. Some poeple think elections are just a game ... who is up who is down ...boohoooooo' Give me a break ! The Clintons come in a double pack and Hillary would not stand by herself – not because she is a woman but because she has nothing to offer except of selling 'Back to the future' as 'Real Change'.

The Clintons are the big boys indeed ... the big old boys. So are the Bushs.

Frank

great times ahead   January 21st, 2008 12:42 pm ET

Gee, Obama had Oprah getting votes for him - what is he whining about?

Steve Jay   January 21st, 2008 12:41 pm ET

Its laughable how Obama accuses the Clintons yet he is the one that started the dirty politics. I hope the American people are smart enough to see beyond his spin and hype.

angelina_ MN   January 21st, 2008 12:41 pm ET

Yes Senator Obama is running against both Bill and Hillary and against the democratic establishment, and status quo (that part of the party that ruins the rest of party).
I mean at times Senator Obama is running against all odds in this country. But hey that is what he means by change, change to shake and change establishment which the Clintons want us to be stuck to.

I just wish Senator Obama and Edwards join and then run against the Clintons and establishment... that would mean CHANGE................... for good.

David   January 21st, 2008 12:41 pm ET

BOO HOO HOO – They are picking on me again. Obama is in the big leagues now and he'd better start acting like it. This is child's play compared to what the Republicans are going to do to him. There is absolutely NOTHNG wrong with the spouse campaigning for the candidate – too bad one of them is a former President – GET OVER IT!!... The most powerful "celebrity" in the country (Oprah) who has incredible influence come out and competes but not a word...And let's not forget Obama and Edwards doube team against HIllary – or all the negative press Hillary has gotten over several weeks.. SPARE ME THE INDIGNATION – IF YOU CAN'T FIGHT FOR A NOMINATION HOW IN THE WORLD ARE YOU GOING TO STAND UP TO A TERRORIST LEADER.

Larry Dickman - IA   January 21st, 2008 12:41 pm ET

You didn't see this one coming?

Welcome to the game.

Tom Jones Jr   January 21st, 2008 12:41 pm ET

Sounds like the Obama Team was not ready for "Prime Time Politics" hence; sounds and looks like Senator Obama and those who shuffle his papers for him, keep him on a schedule, and basically do the Executive Management "stuff" for him (the Obama Team) truly ARE NOT READY for Prime Time – Leading and Running an entire Country! They are not ready and he is not ready – a vote for Obama is a vote for Ineptitude, if that is what you want – go for it!

Marko Dezdri, Portland, OR   January 21st, 2008 12:41 pm ET

Crybaby! That's all.

Hillary 08

Len   January 21st, 2008 12:40 pm ET

In reading these comments ,it seem like we already have signifcant anger ,hatred and division. Stay tuned! More to come if the Clintons' are again elected to the presidency.
Go Obama 2008!!

Joe, Wilmington DE   January 21st, 2008 12:40 pm ET

Fair play from the Clintons? Keep dreaming. These are two of the most despicable politicians in America today.

I hope people realize that America deserves far better than Bill & Hillary.

KEVIN, Loves Park, IL   January 21st, 2008 12:40 pm ET

I am really tired of Bill and Hillary Clinton. Bill has been a dishonest politician since his days as Governor of Arkansas, he lost more credibily cheating on his wife while in the White House. and let's not forget Bill was Impeached as a Sitting President for lying to a grand jury. Why do we even listen to Bill Clinton? Hillary only stayed around so he can help her politicial aspirations.

Gil - California   January 21st, 2008 12:40 pm ET

Bill Clinton is a jerk and will never change his ways. He will say or do anything to get back into the office. He legacy is being tarnished right now and he is too near-sighted to see it.

Ryan Parent   January 21st, 2008 12:39 pm ET

Is Barack Obama so worried about losing that now he has to attack Bill, I went to see Bill Clinton at a Town Hall event in Minden Nevada, and all of what he said was accurate. Baracks record is not the best, and Barack reminds me somewhat of John Kerry with his wish washy views.

Eric   January 21st, 2008 12:38 pm ET

Personally, I feel that this article draws attention to the type of campaign the Clintons' are running; Obama has to respond or the allegations turn into facts, which I do not view as whining. The issue is that the Clinton campaign continues to focus on Obama instead of its platform. While I realize this is a part of politics and should be expected, I hope our country will chose a president based on his/her stance on issues, not how well (s)he villifies the opposition in order to appear as the least of the evils. I don't think the Clinton campaign has many redeeming qualities in that respect.

L. White   January 21st, 2008 12:38 pm ET

I' disgusted with bill clinton and his distortions in order to be sure his wife, Hillary wins. WHy can't Hillary make it on her own if she is so good????

joe S   January 21st, 2008 12:38 pm ET

boo hoo hoo. If Obama doesn't realize Washington is that cut-throat, then he should stay out of it. More and more, he's becoming more arrogant in the way he speaks, yet i haven't heard solid plans for the future.

Whiner – that will get us some good. Obama's complaining against the two Clintons – what will he do when Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, Venezuela and other countries all started going against him at the same time?

v.cifaldi&paul   January 21st, 2008 12:38 pm ET

BY THE WAY, HILLARY WASN'T "CRYING FOR POLITICAL VOTES"....SHE DIDN'T EVEN CRY, NUMBER ONE,

NUMBER TWO, SHE CARES THAT MUCH ABOUT HER COUNTRY AND WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO IT OVER THE LAST 8 YEARS AND REALIZES THAT IF SHE DOESN'T GET IN THERE AND DO SOMETHING, IT'S GOING TO CONTINUE.

GET OFF HER BACK! SHE IS SMARTER AND STRONGER THAN ANY MAN ON THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL!

GO HILLARY!!

STOP CRYING, BARRY!!!

Demfan   January 21st, 2008 12:38 pm ET

Obama has been bellyaching since the beginning of this campaign. If he makes a misstatement then he is SO tired; everyone is picking on him, but if you can't take the heat,etc. Michelle is completely obnoxious -another whiner and speaks poorly of her own husband. Do not forget in 2000, it was Mrs. Bush(Barbara), the President's WIFE, who called Hillary a "word that rhymes with witch". Was that acceptable for a spouse?
As for the Obama/Clinton controversy, Obama has made statements that are contradictory on several occasions. This morning GMA showed what was billed to be PROOF that Bill Clinton was lying; but, it showed just the opposite. Obama claimed that Bill said that he (Obama) proposed that Republicans had superior ideas for the past 30 years. Bill did not; he said that Obama claimed that the new good ideas were Republican for the past 15 years which, of course, insults Pres. Clinton. Unbelievably, George Stephanopoulis (sic?) just shook his head as if Clinton were pathetic. Clinton has made accurate representations of Obama's position. Further, a young man who is running for President should not be picking apart a fellow Democrat, one who is a favorite and has an excellent record. Obama needs to know his place.

from: North of USA   January 21st, 2008 12:37 pm ET

VOTE for stronger and experienced Candidate in Congress !!!!!!!!

Hillary Clinton is most experience Candidate and strong !!!!!!!!
VOTE goes to Hillary Clinton !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

lorraine   January 21st, 2008 12:37 pm ET

I am so glad that former President Bill Clinton is speaking out on behalf of his wife, this man has so much experience and so much to offer the American people that it would be totally wrong for him to stay in background and not become involved in her campaign, I have always felt that the Clintons have worked for the best interest of the people – both of them very brilliant and very concerned for the needs and wants of other people. If Mrs Obama wants to endorse her husband she can say whatever she wants whenever she wants – Hoping the best for both the Clintons, lucky enough to go to a speech Bill Clinton gave and came out of it along with everyone else in the building wanting to open my eyes and see what is going on around me and do something about it.

Jerry,DENVER,CO   January 21st, 2008 12:37 pm ET

Bill Clinton is an idiot. As if we needed further proof of this. Go Obama! Don't let the liars and power mongers get you down! Out with the old and in with the new. The Clinton's have digraced themselves.

Carol, Atlanta   January 21st, 2008 12:37 pm ET

Give me a break! If Obama cannot handle a vigorous campaign how will he be able to tackle real challenges should he become President.? He should stop whining and fight for the position since he thinks he deserves it. Did Obama think he would be handed the Presidency because he is a good orator? Get real.

Andrew   January 21st, 2008 12:37 pm ET

This "if he can't stand the heat" notion is pure nonsense. The point is this is a Democratic primary, not the general. If it was Republicans attacking him and not the last Democratic president, there would be no question that he can shoot back with whatever ammo he needs to. Lots of you Clinton supporters don't seem to get this, and thus don't grasp the true nature of what Bill is doing.

And for the last time, anyone who continually repeats the "Obama doesn't have specific plans" lie, do yourself a favor and go to his website and check out his 60 page .pdf of his plans. It's your own fault if you can't find this info by yourself and instead depend on the political distortions to tell you what to believe.

John Albino   January 21st, 2008 12:36 pm ET

Hey Obama is right and why is no one in the media
giving him his due – it seems unfair that Bill Clinton
seems to be running for office again with Hillary.

Are we ever going to grow up and quit the
Bush- Clinton-Bush-Clinton cycle again?It is due time for
someone to lead who has not been in the White House
and who is not POWER HUNGRY. but someone who
has the heart,brains and common sense to lead with dignity.
John – Altamonte Springs
Florida.

Karen   January 21st, 2008 12:36 pm ET

Obama needs to tell us what he plans to do as President and stop worrying about the Clintons. If she wins, she wins but whoever wins needs to expain their agenda for America and the World.

Dusacre   January 21st, 2008 12:36 pm ET

Bob Dunbar,

You wrote: "Come on all you real democrats. Lets get behind Hillary" .

Where will Hillary lead us and what about the future of the Democratic Party!

Hillary wants to be a CEO President.

As a CEO, if I have two products to bring to the market. One that has the qualities, performance, and liabilities etc of Hillary and the product has the qualities, performance, and liabilities etc of Obama. I will go with Obama. He win be the winner, it may take some time and some doing, but Obama is definitively the winner.

William   January 21st, 2008 12:36 pm ET

For months, when Hillary Clinton was the clear front runner, she was attacked left, right, and center from both republicans and democrats and their representatives, and people kept on commenting how she is dirty.

Now that the Democratic nomination is much closer, and HRC and her representatives, including former president Bill Clinton, are attacking, people are complaining that they are using dirty tactics?!

On an even playing field, if you're going to allow one party to use certain methods, you should allow the other party to use the same. If you complain about the tactics HRC and her campaign are using, especially after having no problem whatsoever with other groups using their dirty methods, you are being a hypocrite.

from: North of USA   January 21st, 2008 12:35 pm ET

VOTE FOR STRONGER and EXPERIENCED CANDIDATE IN CONGRESS !!!!!!!!

Jether J.   January 21st, 2008 12:34 pm ET

Hey Jack,

Actually if you listen to Right Wing Media, they're all saying they want Hillary to win the democratic nomination. Hannity said it, Dick Morris said it and mostly all of the Republican Strategists are saying it. Give us Hillary and we'll send her home crying. They gonna pull all sorts of tricks out their dirty little hat.

So my question is, why not vote for someone who can bring Dems, Indies, and Moderate Republicans together? The Republicans are keeping Obama out their mouths because they don't want to expose him to Moderate Republicans or Independents.

Either way, Democrats have great choices for the Presidency this year and I'm loving it. Now if only Hillary and Obama can kiss and make up and get on the ticket together, they would be invincible!

Russ   January 21st, 2008 12:34 pm ET

What did you think you would get with Hillary running?
Beside, your wife is the first to pushed the race card when she said,
Quote; "they will wake up and get it" refering to the fact that you are like them.
And it was your people in SC that pushed the half truth statements(your five point memo) about what the Clintons said and made them out to be villians, when in fact if you had quoted the whole comments you would not have heard any such thing. Is this your new kind of politics?
If you can't take it now then it shows that you can't handle it.
Also do you think for a minute that the Republicans are going to play
anymore fair. They have ROVE and if you think he is not already
working the narrative playing Obama and the Clintons and the Press
against each other then you are just dumb.
Stop preaching to us and give us some substance.
Mr Obama you are not Martin L King, he was a great man, you are just a man hopeing that you might get that kind of support.
And, Here is a question for Obama Supporters.
Would you still not vote for Clinton if the ticket was Clinton/Obama 2008 or Obama/Clinton 2008? If the answer is no to both,then you are not listening to Obama at all. I support Clinton, but I took the time to read everything on Obama's website as well as his Audacity of Hope book. I think he will be a good President in 8 years but not now at age 46 (my age too)
I predicte that it will be
Clinton/Obama 2008 and they will win.
Sorry Mr Edwards you were part of the team the lost last time.

Shay   January 21st, 2008 12:34 pm ET

After Clinton won in New Hampshire, as a young independent voter, it turned me of. Obama has inspired young Americans to take an interest in politics. I think he can motivate people to make the sacrifices that this nation is going to have to make, whether it be energy consumption or controlling spending.

Clinton support seems to stem from older Americans, but history has shown us that change always comes from colleges and Universities, not Nursing Homes! Obama needs to stress that more.

Andrew P   January 21st, 2008 12:34 pm ET

I haven't hear a peep out of Barack Obama's or John Edwards' Wives concerning their rivals since this campaign got started.

I can only hope that Hillary gets wise to the fact that allowing your spouse to do the heavy lifting will only make you appear weak and overshadowed in a general election, espacially if your spouse has the colossal frame of an ex-president.

Jay Graham, Dallas, TX   January 21st, 2008 12:32 pm ET

After Iowa caucus Obama was given a Rock Star status when he expected everyone not to critisize him on anything. He wanted to have an easy ride to the nomination. But, when Bill made his records public, and Hillary beat him in NH and NV, he is taking his "Mr. Nice" mask and whining like a cry baby with people like Clyburn behind. He should come to the reality of presidential election where everyone has a right to defend his/her position and grab each and every vote by whatever means. Obama should not forget that it took Clintons 15 years to muster the african-american support by constantly working for their cause. And just few inspitarional speeches, he wants them to take their support off to Clintons – just because of his color. That is so wrong!

Mark   January 21st, 2008 12:32 pm ET

Bill is just trying to pay his wife back for his Infidelity, he feels that he owes her, God help this country if she actually gets elected, Go Obama.

bh   January 21st, 2008 12:32 pm ET

wow. is this what we want a president, a woman who cant say what she wants and sends her LYING, CHEATING, TWO-TIMING UNFAITHFUL HUSBAND, out to do her dirty work. wow experience, my God New York what were you thing picking her a senator. her underhandedness would not even allow her to run in her own state! wow, obama is whining? who was just crying tears in a stunt to get votes.
Experience?? if she thinks that this is making her the best for the job DONT hire.
Experience is what has this country in the place we are now. at the behest of lying cheating rich politicians who would make a better MTV reality show called How i cant relate to the people that i am trying to help. do your research people. 50million dollars in a blind trust account. what is a public servant doing with that type of money?
do your research

Bein Careful   January 21st, 2008 12:31 pm ET

You are running against both Clintons, Mr. Obama, just as Hillary is running against you and your wife. However, the Clintons are the dirtiest players in the game and you will be shredded and spit out every opportunity those two get. They have shown that anything goes in order to return Billieboy back to the WH. After all, they deserve to be there. Anyone but the Clintons, please.

Alex   January 21st, 2008 12:31 pm ET

What will Obama do when he faces Putin? Chavez? Kim Jong? China? Uh, should I mention Bin Laden? These leaders/countries play the most serious game of hard ball - against the US - that one can imagine. Ever since this campaign started I have tried to imagine Obama facing these and other world leaders - and I just can't see it. He doesn't have the experience, strength, knowledge, and now, clearly, backbone to be taken seriously. Don't you think they are already watching this race, and taking note? Do you think that Hillary tearing up for all of two seconds makes them think for one second that she is weak? No. But watching Obama slither around, change his story (about change) and not be true to anything gives them all they need to know. Based on his actions, would you actually want this guy making decisions for America against much smarter and tougher opponents? And opponents they are, by history and by default, whether you like that view or not.

Obama brought out his "big" guns (who apparently didn't do that much for him) and he is now crying foul that the other side has major players too? Get over it, Obama, and step down. You are not the man for the job.

Becky Kendzulak   January 21st, 2008 12:31 pm ET

I have to say I am disgusted at the behavior of former President Clinton. I find his comments to be whining and misleading. I voted for Obama in the New Hampshire primaries, but I have not been anti-Hillary by any means. I have always voted democrat in national elections. I voted for Bill Clinton 3 times (once in the New Hampshire primaries). I've always defended him because I believed he was a good president, but he is completely out of line. If the Clinton campaign continues as it is and Bill can't keep his ego in check, I would seriously consider voting for McCain or Guiliani if either were the nominee running against Hillary.

Kenyotta   January 21st, 2008 12:30 pm ET

I was a real Clinton supporter back in the day. I know it was cool to refer to Bill as the first African-American president. I was even in Hillary's corner as the election season began. Hill and Bill changed all that. They have done nothing but play dirty politics while using Obama's message of change. I cannot for the life of me figure how they can preach against the status quo and they are a part of it. Bill did a Band-Aid job when he was in office, and I hated to admit it because of how much love I had for him, but his mouth has changed my position on him. Hill was a supporter of a man that if he had won the presidency, I wouldn't be able to voice my opinion on this matter. Why do people tend to forget her support for Goldwater? I have nothing left for the Clintons but despise. If Obama does not win the nomination, I will not be voting this time around. Anyone But Clinton!

Khwaty   January 21st, 2008 12:30 pm ET

Obama has shown his weakness, he is not ready for President. The job of US President, is the toughest any man/woman can have in this country. I was thinking it would be Hillary who'd be whining all the time, she is attack severely by Obama and his campaign people; but she forge ahead and take it better than a man. Obama and Edwards tag teamed against her.

I'm Edwards supporter, he's getting my vote. I say things as is, the strength of Senator Clinton is apparent. Like others, I've underestimated her, she's a formidable opponent in the general election. She would be a very good President this time for our country. BUT, I still support Edwards, he's my boy, I already pledged my vote for him months ago.

curious   January 21st, 2008 12:29 pm ET

isn't it unconstitutional for Hillary to run as president? In theory, the reason the 22nd amendment, which limits the term of a president, was ratified is because we do not want one person's opinions or views having control over the country for several years. So if Hillary becomes president, doesn't our country in effect becomes an oligarchy? Furthermore, can you really argue that Bill wouldn't have any input in any of the decisions Hillary, if she becomes president, would make? Doesn't Bill and Hillary virtually have the same views on issues? So, with this trend, would we elect Laura Bush after 8 years?

Sky   January 21st, 2008 12:28 pm ET

You should judge a person by the way they have lived.
We know the Clinton's are liars! Why would anyone vote for them.
They have lived off the backs of hardworking Americans too long.
When Clinton was president my son was in the military and couldn't
even support his family on his pay. The Clinton's though were traveling the world with our money and sending their daughter to the best schools on our money. They did nothing to improve the economy. The economy was great during the 90's because of Y2K. Americans, you need to start reading and doing your homework before voting. Stop listening to the media!
Scott, of Madison WI, I loved your comment. Facts, please, only the facts.
Do you remember the way the democrates ostricized Linda Tripp for telling the truth. The media treated her worse then Osama BinLaden. If Mrs Clinton were a strong women she would have gone to Linda Tripp and thanked her for doing the right thing. Of course that would never happen because the Clinton's never do the right thing. Please people, lets vote in a honorable President. I don't care what party, let it just be a person we can trust, hopefully Edwards or Romney.

Tim, Seattle, WA   January 21st, 2008 12:28 pm ET

Clintons are crooks and driven by their own ambition. Pure and simple. If Hillary wins the nomination, I'm voting Republican, as much as it will kill me...

Herman   January 21st, 2008 12:28 pm ET

This is not even about Obama anymore

This is about ending the chokehold the Clinton's have had on the Democratic Party as an institution for nearly the last two decades.

It's sad when a great democracy like the U.S reverts to political dynasties. It stifles innovation and leads to a meandering of the political process.

A Clinton nomination opens to the door to a return of Republican control of congress, which would mean another four years of political gridlock in these dire times.

Chris, Middletown, CT   January 21st, 2008 12:27 pm ET

Doesn't "misrepresent" mean "lying"....and thats what Clinton has done for the 8 years he was in office....and prior to that when the people of Arkansas used to call him "Slick Willy"? The Clinton supporters baffle me....they will spend their lives making excuses for these two – stop it

KT   January 21st, 2008 12:26 pm ET

Hillary lover in Texas,

I think you are mistaken! Michelle Obama has been on the home front taking care of their children.....she hasn't been on the attack or even much in the public eye in the month or so! Wake up and tell the truth!

Carolyn Q   January 21st, 2008 12:26 pm ET

Why would anyone want Bill Clinton in the White House again? He's part of the package when you vote for Hillary. Bill Clinton clearly still believes he can say and do anything he wants, no matter who it hurts. He still thinks nothing of distorting the truth for his own advantage. People may think he should be forgiven for his blatent lies while President, or his behavior with women which demonstrated he'd stoop to any level to get his own desires met, even if it means disgracing his "representation of our government" , along with his family. However, forgiveness is not synonomous with forgetting. You can forgive his actions, if he's truly repented. But, we don't have to act like nothing happened and put him back in the White House. He doesn't deserve that priviledge. Hillary has to live with that corrupt baggage that she chose to stay with. Bill Clinton is sowing his deep anger and lies while on the campaign trail. He is out of control, again, in the name of "campaigning". He isn't to be trusted. Still waters run deep.

BobW   January 21st, 2008 12:26 pm ET

I have attempted to post my sentiments but CNN has deemed them unworthy. Could it be because they were pro Obama? Way to go Clinton News Network!

abib   January 21st, 2008 12:26 pm ET

People of america ,please somebody answer my question:
IS BILL RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT AGAIN?
WHAT THE CONSTITUTION SAY ABOUT THAT?

David   January 21st, 2008 12:26 pm ET

Wayne,

"I'm voting for Hillary, because she has the experience, and She and Bill know how to win against the RightWingers, Obama doesn't. ???? So that is what this is all about? That is the problem with America in a nutshell. It is my party that matters, not my country. God help us.

Steve-O   January 21st, 2008 12:25 pm ET

As a former Clinton supporter, I think the former President's recent behavior has been unseemly at best. Once again we are reminded how the Clintons will say and do anything for power.

Adam   January 21st, 2008 12:24 pm ET

"Obama is running for President. Maybe he needs to learn how to play with the big boys. Whining isn't the way." Samantha

It worked for hillary in New hampshire. All these mean boys are ganging up on me, I'm just so afraid tears...

Obama is amking sure everyone knows he's defending himself so hillary can't play the sympathy card when she takes hits.

Looks to me like Obama is really the one being ganged up on by the establishment.

Jose Card - Independent   January 21st, 2008 12:24 pm ET

Obama is running against a former president for the third term and his wife.
There is no question about that.

Julia, California   January 21st, 2008 12:24 pm ET

Obama should not run as a democrat. He should run as independent as he seems fighting against democrat principles. Bill Clinton was a good president. As wife can campaign for husband, so is husband for wife.

Alvin Smith   January 21st, 2008 12:24 pm ET

I find it very disturbing that Obama cannot debate the issues and provide a specific plan about anything. He is so vague about what he is going to do if he became President that I have no idea what his plan is. His speeches are great sound bites, but Bush was a great sound bite person too and I didn't vote for him either. I want to hear a plan and his followers should be asking for the same. It would be wrong to have him issue his plan later and everybody then goes crazy. Even though Obama says he is not bringing in the race card, he does so every chance he can. Then Hillary responds in kind. They both better realize it is the independent voters that will get them elected and they are splitting the party and setting up the scenario for Bloomberg to enter the race. When that happens, the GOP can run Dumbo for office and win. And don't think Rove isn't behind some of the news from the GOP about inflaming the issue too.

Ryan   January 21st, 2008 12:23 pm ET

Obama is just crying from losing the primary to Hilary. He forgets very easily he has Obrah and other supporters campaigning for him.

hard knock life   January 21st, 2008 12:23 pm ET

I cannot believe that Obama's advisers were so stupid as to allow him to go on national tv and whine to the American people about how he is getting picked on. He must really be tanking if he thinks whining is a good strategy. He has done nothing but tear both the African American community and the DNC apart for personal gain since he lost NH. Oh, he's a uniter as long as he's winning.

Grow up Obama and take your ipod generation supporters with you. Some of us live in a country where we worry about the cost of medicine, rent, and food instead of whether or not we can get an iphone at launch.

KT   January 21st, 2008 12:22 pm ET

Anon & Cindy, California,

The difference is that Oprah has voiced her support for Obama....she's not on the attack against Hillary!! Bill is not just supporting, he's attacking, telling lies and acting as though he's the person running....he should support her but butt out and let her fight her own battles as Oprah is doing with Obama!

wbain   January 21st, 2008 12:22 pm ET

Bill Clinton has no part in this race. We are not being asked to elect him...just his wife. The Clinton campaign is obviously worried so they are trying to cash in on his popularity. It won't work.

bob Dunbar   January 21st, 2008 12:20 pm ET

Quit complaining.

Your spouse is out there as well as Hillarys. all the candicates have been piling on Hillary.

The media has given you a free ride. Meet the Press and MSNBC has all but endorsed you.

Come on all you real democrats. Lets get behind Hillary.

Crawford Robertson   January 21st, 2008 12:19 pm ET

As an foreigner from the UK i cannot believe you can let a candidate like Barack Obama slip through your hands. His message of hope should be cherished not abused.

How a man like Bill Clinton, with his history can point fingers is hard to believe. He is morally bankrupt.

Virginia undecided   January 21st, 2008 12:19 pm ET

It's pretty pathetic how when Clinton came up short in Iowa that her and big daddy B started the kill obama campaign tactics. This just shows what the Clinton's will do to win and just how fragile Hillary is that she has to use the weight of a former president to stand on. She will allow any and everything to be said while she sits back looking like a prune denying she hasn't endorsed any comments. The more and more I follow this campain the more I'm feeling the deja vu from the last election. The democrats will endorse a candidate only to have the republicans rip them to shreds. I can't go through another 4 year republican cycle, and I can't afford to go rooting for clinton only to have the republicans rip her open because of her husband turning the white house into the white hot house. Are we voting for her or her husband? I say no to both right now.

Marge Hibbing Mn   January 21st, 2008 12:18 pm ET

Well the Clintons are up against obama and oprah and the MSM and the republican party and the blacks...I think Bill and Hillary Clinton must be a formidable opponent if all those on Obama's side don't outweigh them.

Oh and I forgot the wife of Obama who is more than vocal.

v.cifaldi&paul   January 21st, 2008 12:18 pm ET

IS EVERYONE FORGETTING THAT HE IS HER HUSBAND?! IF YOU THINK FOR ONE MINUTE THAT MICHELLE OBAMA ISN'T RUNNING WITH HER HUSBAND, THINK AGAIN. OF COURSE HE WILL PROTECT HER, DEFEND HER AND KEEP HER ENEMIES AWAY. ISN'T THAT WHAT HUSBANDS ARE SUPPOSED TO DO?! IT'S WHAT I DO AND WHAT MOST REAL MEN DO.

SUCK IT UP, BARRY...YES YOU ARE RUNNING AGAINST BOTH CLINTONS AS THEY ARE RUNNING AGAINST BOTH OBAMAS.

GUESS WHAT? I KNOW WHO'S THE TOUGHER AND SMARTER PAIR.

GO HILLARY!!!!!

Doug   January 21st, 2008 12:18 pm ET

Hillary wouldn't be able to win a race on her own! Just another point that she is unable to do anything on her own. Makes one wonder just how will be making the decisions if she makes it to the white house. We need a change in the country! She has been in government for 35 years. There will be no change with her. She knows all the games. Plus she probably still has palms that she still needs to grease.

Oh! The Irony   January 21st, 2008 12:18 pm ET

Everybody is labelling Obama as a whiner, but Hillary was the one literally crying for potential votes.

FUNNY.

Jim   January 21st, 2008 12:18 pm ET

"Present" Whine whine "Present" whine whine "Present"
Where and what does BO really stand for? All we know is that he is "Present". And that he may or moy not have, unsure what I would have done. READ TH TRANSCRIPTS – Bill is absolutely correct and did not distort anything!!!

Dusacre   January 21st, 2008 12:18 pm ET

The Republican machine is joining the Clintons machine to criticize Obama because Hillary will easily be defeated by republicans. Obama is a real danger to the republican establishment.

Why?

1) Obama is bringing a huge number of young people into the democratic process. This is a present and future treats to the Republican Party. The republicans have the ability to look at the future. The Clintons and their supporters are just looking at the present.

2) Obama will unite Americans across age, gender, political parties and independents, and independents. The nightmare of having the Clintons in the Whitehouse again will create a powerful popular wave against the Clintons in November. Hillary will not win. Her win will pull this country apart at the moment when we need to be united. America is no longer what it was. We have serious changers ahead of us. So let be wise for the sake of our beloved country.

Ray   January 21st, 2008 12:17 pm ET

Like many have said...Grow Up Obama!!! Your stand up in Nevada was picking on Hillary? I think you called her an old lady that needed help crossing the street. You knew there was a false ad out there and you did nothing to stop it. Your wife is giving speech's slamming Hillary and her record. Guess what, no one knows who your wife is or cares. Bill was the President and people look up to him. Maybe one day people will do the same to you, But not if you keep acting the way you are now.
Grow a pair!

Sabrina   January 21st, 2008 12:17 pm ET

If Obama can not take it like a man from Bill, what will he do when the republicans get hold of him ,as Cheney would say, you are having a cake walk!!!!!!

roger   January 21st, 2008 12:17 pm ET

If Obama can not handle the pressure from his opponents then how is he going to handle the pressure associated with the presidency? Unfit for the job!

Mildred   January 21st, 2008 12:16 pm ET

With a one- sided media Hillary needs Bill. The Republicans pumped so much money into Iowa a Republican state to change the minds of the African American society. It worked. The same media that is trying to damage Hillary and Bill with turn right round and do the same to Obama in the main election.

Terrie drummond   January 21st, 2008 12:16 pm ET

QUIT YER WHINING, Obama......If you want Bill to stop campaining then your wife has to also. I guess the inexperience that makes me afraid of voting for you is showing up in the two year old whining about Bill being mean and picking on you. Grow UP.

rabblerouser   January 21st, 2008 12:15 pm ET

Plenty of ex presidents have campaigned for those who had been their vice presidents. No one has said anything about that.

Do we really want a whiner in the White House? If you want to be president, tell us why we should vote for you? What have you done that makes you the one for the job? This is an interview – I don't want to hear what you will do, or how I should just trust you – answer the question that many employers have asked of me on my job interviews: "What can you tell me about your prior experience that makes you feel you can do this job?"

Dan   January 21st, 2008 12:15 pm ET

Obama: you're up against reality: two people with a ton of experience.
Everyone likes to dream – but electing a president for his promisary words of hope does not help our country in a critical post 9-11 time.

Come back in 8 years when your 28.

Bob   January 21st, 2008 12:15 pm ET

Am I missing something? Someone please tell me about "The Bill Clinton Legacy" last I had heard he was being impeached/ selling secrets to China/ Being Disbarred/Sexual Harrasment lawsuit/ Adultery/ stealing from AF1 and the white house/ Pardoning big money donors.This is the same "Respectable" Ex President that many of you are talking about.

Turns out I dont ever want to be respected if that is your definition

Butch Dillon   January 21st, 2008 12:15 pm ET

Anyone who still believes that Hillary Clinton alone is running for the nomination is naive. The two of them, Bill and Hillary, under the guise of Hillary's campaign are seeking office. One will be the official POTUS the other unofficial. Even loathsome George did not abuse the spirit of elected office this way. Obama's claim is more on the mark than perhaps he realizes. "Clinton" supporters are backing an untrustworthy duo.

Adam Brace   January 21st, 2008 12:15 pm ET

This is a clear example of true colors of a presidential candidate. Instead of fighting over who is right or wrong in this case, perhaps we should all as democrats be disheartened by the fact that both of these candidates would rather engage in a sophomoric cat fight than truly address issues which should shed light on the quality of a presidential candidate that they are. I started out more of an Obama supported simply due to living in upstate NY and not being a fan of Hillary Clinton's NY politics and practices thus far. Now, I'd rather vote for Edwards than see either of these two clearly two dimensional candidates in office. Do you honestly think you'll see any real change from either of these two people, or is it just chaff to take you away from the truth that this country and world are falling apart at an exponential rate?

kid   January 21st, 2008 12:15 pm ET

Haven't we learned our lesson with electing the same family into an office twice?
There is a reason a president cannot be re-elected. Do we want to show the world we have not grown from our mistakes? Obama may not be the answer but change is important to the growth of this country. Stop the Dynasty. Do we really want the text books to read Bush, Clinton, Bush, Clinton?

JAZ   January 21st, 2008 12:14 pm ET

Poor BO. Can't stand the heat, BO? Go back to the sandbox/Illinois Legislature and leave the politics to the big boys and girls.

It was alright with you when Mrs. Hussein Obama got mouthy about the Clintons, but it's not alright when the former President of the United States makes similiar mouthy comments? Double standard, perhaps? Race! That's it, they are racists!

BO, I listen to right wing radio to hear what the enemy is saying – they say they will "fillet" you. Your inability to handle a rough primary indicates you will fold Kerry-style under attack. We need to win this election and you aren't man enough to do it.

Pissed off in NY   January 21st, 2008 12:14 pm ET

LOL, I think its funny that all you Clinton supports are making cracks about the "boo wooo" you think he is wginning about. But at least he is not crying about "its just sooo harrdd"!!!!!! Get real, Bill is a joke and a drity bad one at that. I would have like HRC if she would had dumped that looser long ago! Her record is not bad and the one thing that makes me hate it is.... you guessed it... Bill! Hill, dump him and run again in 2012, then you got my support. Till then Obama or McCain depending on how it goes.

Tang   January 21st, 2008 12:14 pm ET

BooHoo!
He's up against both Clintons?!?
How will he handle the Republicans if he's already crying foul here.
Suck it up Obama ... show us you deserve it.

Gobama   January 21st, 2008 12:14 pm ET

Obama should be saying that he's

UP AGAINST BILL CLINTON THIRD TERM BID!

Obviously, Hilary Clinton is not woman enough for the Presidency. And so Bill Clinton is using Hilary Clinton for a THIRD TERM effort.

STATUS QUO MUST GO!

NO CLINTON THIRD TERM.

A least daddy bush kept a dignified distance when the bushes were running for their third term dynasty.

But Bill Clinton HAS NO DIGNITY!
And his wife has no shame.

So, my fellow Americans, the Clintons would AGAIN shamelessly defile the Oval Office and undermine the US Presidency even more!

Ann, MO   January 21st, 2008 12:14 pm ET

How is Hillary going to be able to work across party lines in Washington to get things done, and how is she going to be able to work with leaders of foreign countries, if she needs to hide behind the coattails of her husband to take on the young "inexperience" senator. She can't have it both ways, either she is "strong" enough to lead this country, or she is so weak that she needs her husband to come to the rescue. For all of the women in this country that have fought hard to break the glass ceilings that they have, certainly they are cringing at the fact that she needs her husband to do the "hard work" while she sets back and tries to "look soft."

S, WI   January 21st, 2008 12:13 pm ET

This is political whining.
What are you going to do when you are up aganist republicans?

Damon Harris   January 21st, 2008 12:13 pm ET

Yea Obama? I bet Hillary thought she was running against Oprah at one point...Cry me a river...

Jack   January 21st, 2008 12:13 pm ET

Bill Clinton is doing nothing that the Republicans won't do 100 times over. As the old saying goes "If you can't stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen."

Whats interesting to me is if you listen to all of the right wing media such as Rush, they desperatly do not want Hilary to win. If you listen, they almost all are united against Hilary and using vitrol and hatred that you cannot believe.

Listen closely and you will not hear the level of hatred toward Obama or Edwards.
the republican's aren't afraid of Obama or Edwards. They know they can beat them with experience.

All the conservative media are rallying against Hilary because they know they will have the fight of their life if she is the nominee.

What does that tell you about who they are most afraid of and who we should be voting for?

Azar   January 21st, 2008 12:13 pm ET

I am in full agreement with Scott, Madison, WI. The Clintons are famous for distorting facts. Wake up people!. This husband and wife team is attempting to pull wool over our eyes!

Jether J.   January 21st, 2008 12:12 pm ET

I do believe Obama is running against Hillary and Bill and I think he's doing a good job of standing his ground. Now what he should do is maximize focus on his policies and plans for America. But give the man some credit for coming up against the Clintons.

I also believe Hillary should tell Bill to take a back seat because he is doing a lot of the talking for her and this leads me to think that Hillary will not be an effective leader in the White House without consulting Bill Clinton. He's not running, she is!

Emily, Atlanta, GA   January 21st, 2008 12:12 pm ET

Boogie from LA, I agree with you:

Obama said the reason he is running now is because he doesn't want all the hopes boiled out of him by staying in Washington for too long.

He said on a Tim Russert interview that a few years from now his life may not be in the same orbit and they may not have the same feelings for what ordinary people are going through.

He seems to think that anymore experience in Washington is bad for him...unless he becomes president.

He also seems to imply that anyone who has spent more time in Washington than him would not make a good president because they have been poisoned by the system.

And the people who have spent all their lives representing their constituents probably have their hopes boiled out of them.

I liked Obama at first when I did not listen too closely to his words.

John - NY   January 21st, 2008 12:11 pm ET

Let's remember, while Bill Clinton as a lot of positive qualities, honesty is not one of them. People need to stop believing him without questioning and vefifying his statements first.

Sally   January 21st, 2008 12:11 pm ET

I totally agree Mr Obama. And unfortunately sorry to say there are some dumb Hillary supporters whose best answer for supporting her is because she is a woman. Its hard to think that women became educated to make sensible choices, but that is the best reason they have in supporting a candidate. What a pity. Black, white, man or woman should it make a different, well to some women it does. Wow and they claim that there are more educated and smarter that men I wonder.

just joe   January 21st, 2008 12:10 pm ET

Geei, I didn't know that Bill Clinton was running for President again. According to Obama, it sure sounds like he is. Wincing and crying "wolf" so often says a lot about someone who wants to be President............and, it sounds terribly familiar to someone who finds that a major fault of the guy holding down the job now.
Instead of complaining, hit the books and come up with some actions you would implement if elected......in detail. I am tired of using "Change" as a rationale for voting for someone. Hell, I do that every 4 years even without hearing the word over and over and over again.

Linda   January 21st, 2008 12:10 pm ET

Oh c'mon. If Obama can't handle two Clintons, then how is he going to handle the country and world issues? I definitely have Obama in the scope of possibilities of who I might vote for but this whining is not making me feel very confident. Quite frankly, I like the strength the Clintons are showing. And I'm not a strong supporter of Hillary. (I much prefer John Edwards over all and I'm baffled why more people are not looking at him closer. But I guess I should understand since Bush kind of got voted in twice!)

Hillarylover in Texas   January 21st, 2008 12:10 pm ET

January 21, 2008 9:16 am ET

Michelle Obama is also out shooting her mouth off. Why not give that some press?

Thank you! Say the truth Obama you fear Bill because he makes sense to the people. Take it like a man.

Kenny, Tulsa, OK   January 21st, 2008 12:10 pm ET

So Obama is a whiner? A cry baby? But it's okay for Hillary to 'break down' over a comment about her hair? Spare me! You can bet I won't vote for either one of them, but calling him names while talking her up is some pretty obvious hypocrisy. But then again, we are talking about the Clinton's and their supporters.

robert   January 21st, 2008 12:09 pm ET

Typical... Last week Obama brought up the race card in a MLK speech and since that really didn't work, he is now claiming that his opponents are picking on him.. Grow up Barak Hussein, if you want to be president. you are going to have to get thicker skin and man up. Talk about your issues and stop making excuses, this election is too important!

chris   January 21st, 2008 12:09 pm ET

hey obama, don't tell me you didn't know who hillary's husband is!
your wife campaigns for you and you even drag a celebrity like oprah to get
more audience and votes for you. so what are you whining about?
how are you going to deal with the republicans when they dig dirt about you? and the world leaders when they dig put pressure on you? wait 8 more years.... you still need a lot to learn!

ella   January 21st, 2008 12:09 pm ET

Bill Clinton is a private citizen, he has the right to campagin for his wife. It is two against two! Michelle is on the campagin trail bashing Hillary. The media has given him a free ride, and it is about time someone challenged him on his record, is this wrong.

sandy   January 21st, 2008 12:08 pm ET

I am a white woman,64 years old have watched many presidents come and go. I had a lot of respect for Bill Clinton when he was president. That is all gone now. If Hillary Clinton cannot win this race on her own merits and without Bill attacking Obama falsely (yes falselly), then she does not deserve the nomination. Obama is having to take them both on. Bill Clinton is not running for President, he only wishes he were. I see it clearly now. The Clinton's will do anything to get back into the White House. How sad

Cris   January 21st, 2008 12:08 pm ET

If he cannot take the heat now when both Clinton and Edwards are starting to question him on his campaign....will he do when he is president and things get bad for him....who will he cry to.....they both need to get over it and get on with the issues and stop this talk of racism and "he said she said" stuff." Its rediculous!!!!!!

MSW   January 21st, 2008 12:07 pm ET

Bill and Hiliary are both running for President! It is hard to tell which one is the front runner. Can you imagine what the Whitehouse would be like if Hiliary gets in officially? 2 Clintons running the Country.(well Bill with his wife in the background) Bill Clinton will make sure that he continues a third term by the skirt of Hiliary. Bill has ulterior motives for all his campaigning. He is in his element and will do anything to get back into the Whitehouse. Hiliary should tell him to back off.

Steven Baker   January 21st, 2008 12:06 pm ET

The biggest mystery to me in this entire political campaign is why no one seems to be willing to challenge Hillary Clinton's BIG LIE about how her vast experience entitles her to be President. One can only guess that she must be referring to her HUSBAND'S experience, which is not her own. She has almost zero executive experience. Let's face it, she's essentially a one-term junior Senator with less actual experience that might be useful to a President than any other candidate.

I've been following the campaigns closely and I have never heard or seen another candidate or, especially, anyone in the press challenge her on this lie. Why don't we start keeping them honest?

william   January 21st, 2008 12:06 pm ET

I cna't support the person say too mush do nothing.

JACKIE   January 21st, 2008 12:05 pm ET

I agree that Obama can excite a crowd but so could Hitler !
This country right now needs a leader that is ready to take over and be President and not be elected on the Oprah factor or the color of his skin card. I don't care for Michelle Obama, she seems to have a bit of a chip on her shoulder and seems to portray the fact that because they are a black family they deserve to be in the White House. Not so..

I truly hope the Clintons press on and Hillary is our next President and not because she is a woman but because she is qualified to be PRESIDENT.

Claudette, TX   January 21st, 2008 12:05 pm ET

Good grief Obama. Don't use all your "whine" before you get to Wisconsin. They have some cheese there for ya.

Soneone please send this pre-schooler home.

NObama '08 or ever.

Kansas Independent Moderate   January 21st, 2008 12:05 pm ET

POINT NUMBER ONE: If Hillary and Bill will resort to attacks, distortions, and lies TO GET ELECTED, then what kind of president will they be?

POINT NUMBER TWO: With Hillary, (and more so about Bill), this election is more about their own personal EGOS. With Obama, this election is about US,and how WE can join our VOICES together to bring HOPE to a country that so desperately needs it.

POINT NUMBER THREE: Bill Clinton does not care, at all, about his legacy. All the good he has tried to do since he left office, is now down the drain.

BILL CLINTON IS LIKE SCHMEIGEL CLINGING TO THE RING OF POWER.

I believe in HOPE, I believe in WE.

Obama 08

Eeeeer!?   January 21st, 2008 12:04 pm ET

Oh boo-hoo!

Obama made comment, about President Bill Clinton's legacy, and compared it ill-favourably to REPUBLICAN Ronald Reagan's term in office.

I'm guessing that gives old Bill the right to comment.

Obama stop the crying, and show a little bit of loyalty to 'your' DEMOCRAT organization.

T. Fox , Ashland, Ma.   January 21st, 2008 12:04 pm ET

VOTERS IN MASSACHUSETTS

are hoping and praying for

"THE DREAM TEAM"

Michael   January 21st, 2008 12:04 pm ET

BRG, where did you hear Clinton won Iowa by six points?

J   January 21st, 2008 12:04 pm ET

Bill can support Hillary all he wants, but why does he choose to attack Obama. None of obama supporters (Oprah) attacked Hillary. this is very condescending of Bill as an elder statesman!

Ken in Western NY   January 21st, 2008 12:04 pm ET

If Hillary can well up with tears and get all emotional when asked "how do you do it?" – then why on earth can't Obama whine a little? After all, he is only stating that he's up against two disgusting politicians who will lie at the drop of a hat and distort his senatorial record to suit their own needs.

Wake up America, please. The Clinton's are very conniving bumpkins who will say and do anything to get elected. Don't fall for their tricks.

Ithaca   January 21st, 2008 12:03 pm ET

What is Bill Clinton supposed to do? Appear on Oprah?
He has every right to support his own wife and what is wrong with that? Obama has Oprah, Usher and alike. What's the difference?

GO HILLARY GO !!!   January 21st, 2008 12:03 pm ET

Barack needs more wine with his cheesy speeches!!

observer   January 21st, 2008 12:03 pm ET

IfHillary is held accountable for any of Bill's statements should we not hold Obama accountable for Al Sharpton and Michelle's comments? Why is it all so one sided?Anything that is said on Hillary's defense is so bad, on the other hand,anything said regarding Obama is honorable? What's with this? I also agree thatCNN is all over Obama while any gains for Hillary are just overlooked or giving very little of their time. It always turns into, "well, now let's look at the Obama campain."Guess what? If Obama get's the nomination some of Hillary supporters can do the same as others have treatened, vote for a Repubilican.

Anon   January 21st, 2008 12:03 pm ET

How is this any different than having one of the most powerful women in the world (Oprah) campaigning for him? Give me a break!

darrell   January 21st, 2008 12:02 pm ET

Hillary allowing her husband to stand up for makes her appear weak.

To the person from New Jersey,

Edwards will be a Hillary’s spoiler this Saturday.

Watch!

Many of Hillary supporters are going to switch their vote to Edwards as a second Choice.
Sending a strong message to Hillary, We are united as country wanting change from the old Washington status quo.

Hillary may actually place third

Change we can believe in because all Americans are enlisted in it.

Obama 08

Red-Pill Gee   January 21st, 2008 12:02 pm ET

RedPill_Gee wrote: <1m ago
I know this is the wrong board for this but will any Black person explain to me what the Clinton's have done for Blacks that have directly effected your address (meaning you have directly received benefits from policies created and passed by the Clinton's)

I am a 35 year old black guy and from what i can surmise i pulled myself up from a 7 dollar and hour job to making 80k a year by Gods grace and good ole' fashioned hard work.

Educated myself (paid back school loans working two jobs)

Made mistakes along the way (dumped no good friends and association to befriend people with the same vision)

Didn't have ANY kids before I could economically care for them

Studied small business courses and saved every penny i had to fulfill my dream (Micheal Jordan and Ralph Lauren were already millionaires and billionares.....why should i invest in them before me ?)

Seven years later, I made it (this was during the Clinton age)

Someone please tell me what they did that directly influenced my success?

Schools were already integrated?

I caught no red tape (racial ceiling) to get a business license....I am drawing a blank as to why blacks give them such a pass.

I know they boosted welfare funds and collage grants for those at the bottom of the economic ladder ( and that may have done some good for 10% of that demographic) but why such blind loyality.....please explain!!!

The hard working brother

T. Fox , Ashland, Ma.   January 21st, 2008 12:02 pm ET

Massachusetts Voters are hoping for

"THE DREAM TEAM"

Hillary and Obama !

Cindy, Calfiornia   January 21st, 2008 12:02 pm ET

What about if Obama gets elected President...is he going to cry and whine whenever someone criticizes him...grow-up Obama!

SK   January 21st, 2008 12:01 pm ET

It is nice to see first Woman President or African American President in America.

I think Obama is still inexperince and emotional in taking up the challanges. He has to understand the President task is not a easy job. He has to face lot of political pressure with global leaders.

If he can't able to withstand Bill Clinton, I am not sure how he will run stronger america in worst condition.

I feel america needs a experienced president right now to overcome all the mess that Bush did now.

Travler   January 21st, 2008 12:01 pm ET

What BS. While married, it still amounts to the endorsement of an ex President. Obama has Oprah, Hillory has Bill. If Obama can't stand the heat he's been dishing out through his backers, then he should get out of the race.

KT   January 21st, 2008 12:01 pm ET

Poor Hillary, she needs big bad Bill to fight her battles for her. What's she going to do when Chavez attacks her? What's she going to do when other foreign leaders disagree with her or attack her? She going to run and hide behind her hubby? Yeah that's a sign of a true leader!!

Tou   January 21st, 2008 12:01 pm ET

Pay close attention. These tactics by the Clintons are old party politics and is the main reason why we have so much partisanship in the country. This is why we separate black from white. Democrats from Republicans. Poor from rich. Is this what you want to vote for? For nothing to be done and just point fingers at someone else without looking at yourself. I mean you're talking about an ex-president who fornicated with his intern. Where are the Clinton's moral responsibility? They have none, and the only reason they are still together is for their own careers. Sad. Seriously, if Hillary was just running as Hillary Rodham, would you vote for her? I didn't think so. If you are accused of false statements, will you not fight for the truth like Obama? To ignore it, is to agree. He is fighting for change, unlike most Americans who just like to live in ignorant bliss and are too dumb to know that there is a dilemma in the governing of this country that impacts all of our lives.

Shobha   January 21st, 2008 12:00 pm ET

I am sick of people saying that Hillary Clinton does not have any experience other than being first lady. To those younglings out there, who do not keep up with history and getting carried away by a youthful and charismatic Obama: Hillary Clinton practiced law, voted as top 100 lawyers in the country, was on President Nixon's watergate investigation team, probably would have been the first woman supreme court justice had she not married Clinton and be supportive of his political dreams. Please give Hillary Clinton the credit that is due. She may not be as charismatic as Obama is but she is probably better in every other way. Change is good to talk about. Heck everyone wants to see change for the good. Devil is in the detail. Where is the detail, Mr. Obama?

Kenneth Cheeseman   January 21st, 2008 12:00 pm ET

The best thing Bill Clinton can do is go home and watch Tv. He is a master of mud.

Fatima Upegui   January 21st, 2008 11:59 am ET

Mr. Obama knows that eventhough there are giants in the field, God will fight for a man that is able to stand, and fight a good fight of faith.
Didn't David got rid of Goliath, the philistine giant, with a little stone?
To govern a country that is bleeding like ours, we all need to stop, and measure the consequences of electing our next leader.
We do not need more lies, we have to change ourselves, not the constitution, nor the commandments of God.
We do not need a village, we need light in our hearts reflecting in our every days life. What we do, what we say we are going to do, and what is right.

Abe   January 21st, 2008 11:59 am ET

Ok, this is just preposterous....I am a Republican that is voting for Obama and I think that you Democrats are delusional. Do you really think she can win if she is the nominee??? Do you realize how polarizing she is? In the latest polls, up to 40% say under no circumstance would they vote for her!

As for her being able to stand up to the heat....PLEASE! Do you remember her crocodile tears in NH and everyone saying she was being unfairly attacked for being a woman?? SHE is the one that clearly plays the victim and trots out Bill to fight for her. She and Bill have no integrity at all. If you vote establishment and entrenched idealogy it will be another Republican for 8 years....get used to it!

GO OBAMA 08! If not....GO MCCAIN! LOL

George, Billerica, Mass.   January 21st, 2008 11:58 am ET

He needs to get specific about how an Obama administration will be different than another Clinton administration. I like his overall tone, but I expect to hear from a great speaker some great ideas that will sharply contrast with Clinton's. Unless he does this soon, voters will probably go with Clinton, who they at least think they know. I think he's perfectly capable of serving as President. But his political naivete is now on full display.

Democrat in CA   January 21st, 2008 11:57 am ET

I really like the Clintons, however, I was very disappointed by their behavior after Iowa. They subtly played the race card in Iowa. And she subtly played it again in New Hampshire in the diner. I do not know if they were shocked to have loss to an African-American, or they did not believe Obama could do it. Ever since Iowa, they have attacked this man personally. They have used unreliable information to discredit him. They have used his race, inexperience in the political realm, and have insulted his voting record. He has not responded to their attacks. The response he has made has been to the former President and not to the candidate. For those of you who believe Obama is whining, that is unfortunate. He is asking the Clinton campagin to speak to the facts. I checked the report card and oddly enough, he and Hillary voted pretty much the same with minor variances. I am interested in the candidate that has his or her character and integrity intact and will not attack personally, but on the facts. I am also interested in the candidate that has a viable plan that will help our country manuever through this mess our current administration has put us.

deekerj   January 21st, 2008 11:57 am ET

I've been supporting Barack ever since I gave out hope that Al Gore would run. That said, up until that Philadelphia debate, I didn't think there was any doubt I would end up voting for the Democratic nominee. That said, I think as a voter I could not vote for the Clinton(s) campaign after the way in which it has flat-out lied about Sen. Obama's record on 1) his position on the war of choice in Iraq; 2) his healthcare policy and the minimal contrasts it has with the Clinton healthcare plan; 3) his position on energy policy; 4) his analysis of how he wants to be able to move the political center to the same magnitude, but in the opposite direction, as Ronald Reagan did in 1980; and 5) his pointing out the fact that one of the greatest weaknesses the Democratic party has faced since the early 1990s is, vis-a-vis the GOP, they come across as unprincipled, pandering, jellyfish, which was all exemplified by the Clinton-wing of the Democratic party's cowering before Pres. Bush's push to go into Iraq. Anyone else out there that supports Obama more than anyone else running (but doesn't view him as the second coming either) that had thought just a few months ago they'd vote Dem no matter what but are now questioning whether they could support a campaign as despicable as the Clintons?

Derek Miami, FL   January 21st, 2008 11:57 am ET

I had great deal of respect for Clintons especially for Bill, but after what I have been watching on TV I am actually quite disappointed.
Obama's right! Even though Michelle has been helping him out, she is not a former president. So comparing Michelle with Bill Clinton doesn't even makes sense. Clintons are running together. Two against one. No matter how much Obama does, it won't amount to what Clintons are capable of doing together.
Clintons are not playing fair. At first they underestimated Obama. However, after his first win in IA, president Clinton changed his mind and started making up stories.
Yes, Obama is frustrated. So was Hillary. Hillary herself almost cried when she was giving her speech in IA. Bill was so sad that I thought he was sick.
Obama is frustarated not because he is losing but because he is fighting an unfair fight against both Clintons.
Clintons are just going with the flow. They are so desperate to win that they are making up stories about Obama as they go.
Senator Obama - 'YES, WE CAN!' You've been doing a great job so far. I watched you in IA. If you do they same thing you did in IA, you will win.
Keep up the good work.

tls   January 21st, 2008 11:57 am ET

I agree with "suspicious" . The coverage is overwhelmingly supportive of Obama. He gets no scutiny. When he questions Clinton's comments there is no report as to the truthfulness of the retoric, only condemnation of the Clintons. I also agree that it is absolutely momentous that a woman has come so far. Look at what Katie Curic has endured for an example of being a strong woman and trying to break the glass ceiling. I challenge the news networks to look at their own reporting. Are they afraid of being seen as racist if they comment on Obama? Certainly they feel free to comment on being female. Take Chris Matthews for instance. Or, a heckler asked Hillary to iron her clothes and this is treated as "funny" but a racist comment would be treated with condemnation.

Additionally I think it's sad that after years of serving the African American population, somehow the Clintons have lost their support. I think everyone needs to look at the records of these candidates for what they've actually done.

I'm not anti-Obama. I just feel strongly that Hillary's experience will go much farther in improving our economy and repairing our relationships around the world that Bush has destroyed. I also believe her candidacy is incredibly significant to our daughters.

Linda~n~Wisconsin   January 21st, 2008 11:56 am ET

I just watched a spot on Fox talking about this same point.........they were interviewing a senator from Ohio at the MLK march. My point is that Fox was fairer in this story than either CNN or MSNBC.

In my opinion Obama is playing the same dirty politics as the rest. Did he call for that ad in Nevada to be pulled? Why should someone have to apologize for saying Obama did drug, when he said he did? And on and on...

The media is back to brewing up storms, making the news instead of reporting the news. I say get the pundits a ticket out of town, I am so sick of their dirty spins on the Clintons.

For those of you who have written about the spouses of the other candidates, I agree and thank you.

Wayne   January 21st, 2008 11:55 am ET

Obama needs to call 1-800-CRY-BABY!!!!!

No, wonder the Republicans want Obama to be the Democratic nominee. They will eat him for lunch! Bill and Hillary aren't afraid of the Republicans, and they won't back down to the Right Wingers. That's why the Republicans hate them, because they have never been able to beat the Clintons. Obama would just be a side dish for them.

swede   January 21st, 2008 11:55 am ET

Tou have many who Are out there on your behalf. If you whine about the Clintons then how you are going to handle the whole world..Your in to deep and haven't been around enough to be the leader of this country. Just quit whinning.

Gary   January 21st, 2008 11:55 am ET

Bill Clinton has no credits! American people don't know when President Clinton will come onto the national television to address the nation once more that he has lied about the facts again.

Cynthia St. Louis   January 21st, 2008 11:54 am ET

I am surprised at all of these comments about "whining"- Since when did defending yourself and telling the truth constitute "whining?"

The Billary Machine operates on the same principles as the Republican Machine- distortions, ugly, nasty, power at all costs.

The sad outcome is likely that if Billary wins the nomination, the Republicans will stay in power.

I hope I am wrong.

Obama 08, please!

ann   January 21st, 2008 11:54 am ET

so when obama loses he cries race(yes his advisers did the night of new hampshire–saw it live) and now he is whining about 2 clintons--if he cannot handle two clintons how can he handle putin, musharref, iraq, etc etc........he takes these swipes in his speeches at the clinton administration and Bill can't answer back?............was an obama supporter til the iran vote and other votes of his or should i say nonvotes...................

JJ   January 21st, 2008 11:54 am ET

You're upset because both Clintons are out campaining, they are doubled up on you. Well, if you didn't play the black card so much, maybe they wouldn't be. Do you really want to be elected on your color and not on what you can do or what you stand for??
I really think that in future when we have people running for president, only their records and the issues should be known, they will have numbers assigned and no one will know if they are man or woman, black, white, yellow, red or purple, only the issues will count and not a popularity contest, we did the popularity with the Bush's and look what it got us. War, recession, and a man who plays at being a dictator who runs things by his own rules and to heck with the laws.

Medardo Monzon   January 21st, 2008 11:54 am ET

Regarding Bill Clinton's recent remarks about Barack Obama,:

We already know that Bill Clinton is fully capable to lying to the American people and to lying under oath to protect his own interests. It's despicable and unbecoming of a president his behavior against Barack Obama. Although I was undecided a few weeks ago ,Bill Clinton's negative remarks helped me to decide what Democratic presidential candidate to support .... VOTE OBAMA!

srs   January 21st, 2008 11:53 am ET

wake up Democrats supporting Hilary!!!!!

When will you all realize that the only thing that the Clinton's care about is themselves. They successfully destroyed the Democratic party during his term in pursuit of their personal survival and they are doing it again. By acting has Hilary's pit bull yet again he is demonstrating a complete disdain for the office of President of the US . Compare his action to those of former President Bush (41)who acted as a character reference for his son- but recognized that a former POTUS needed to place himself above partisanship.

I have never voted for a Republican during my life. But if Hilary is the Democratic candidate I certainly will.!! As Joe Biden said there are something that is worth losing an election for.

Flaka   January 21st, 2008 11:53 am ET

Oh CRY ME A RIVER!

Ant in Texas   January 21st, 2008 11:51 am ET

BRG – It's the facts Stupid!!! Hillary didn't win Iowa by six points she was soundly defeated. And, when is a so called win, a loss...when you lose the delegate count!!! BILLARY supporters will see and say anything!!! South Carolina will be the beginning of the end for the Clinton's and their trash truck!!!

I think Obama needs to start slapping BILLARY around on her 35 years of experience, Oh, I mean 35 years of public life. I only hope that the people of South Carolina see through the "TEA Parties" she has been planning for 35 years, the Photo Ops with her husband, and the fact she knows her way around the White House!!!

The "JUNIOR SENATOR from the STATE OF NEW YORK" has no more true/real experience the Obama!!! What a joke, America wake up and get out of the Bushes...put the clintons out to pasture in Ar-kansas!!!

Keet Rock   January 21st, 2008 11:51 am ET

Jorge-

I like the 2 for 1 bit. My only concern is that we have a 2 term minimum for a reason. It is obvious that the Clinton's have an agenda to complete just like the Bush's....

I think America is ready for a middle class party because there has to be a new era of politics in America. I can guarantee you that we will have tropps back in Bosnia as soon as Hil get's into office to finish securing her husbands foreign interest.

I thin the Middle Class Party sounds good. Or the Democratic Labor Party has a ring to it. Obama/Bloomberg sounds good to me....

Harry, NY NY   January 21st, 2008 11:51 am ET

I have never seen a former president interject himself into an election as much as Bill Clinton.

Stand back, stay away. Let your wife stand on her own merits.

But then again, since she is using her husband's resume as her "experience" she needs Bill to be involved.

She will just be a puppet to Bill Clinton's former staff anyway.

Barbara   January 21st, 2008 11:51 am ET

Since when does a statement of fact become "whining"? It would seem that the definitions in ths campaign depend upon one's perspective and the candidate whom they choose to support.

Then again, the media is very good at crafting, and playing, up words to dramatize any occasion.

Akufuna M   January 21st, 2008 11:50 am ET

its clear in this campaign that Americans are not voting for Hillary but Bill clinton. Obama is running against Bill, that much is a fact and bill has been on an offensive campaign much like in his days. What Americans should be aware of, is that times have changed, Alan Greenspan is not longer the Fed Czar, its bernanke's time. Clinton needs to behave like a statesman, be impartial to both candidates and not trying to atone for his sins against Hillary.

Rabin   January 21st, 2008 11:50 am ET

Bill is just another disgrace to this country... he and his wife only talks about the economy during 90s but, never mentions about the stock collapse at the end of his term due to the dot com collapse and, so many people lost everything of their savings. Being a president he did not care about the country otherwise he would have resigned in moral grounds having cought lying his people and, having affair with the intern in his own office. How can people now be fooled that they are going to something going forward. All along he was just busy using his power to rape women... let us hope he has not done this to any minor.

GV   January 21st, 2008 11:49 am ET

Hillary Clinton's experience is continuously mentioned as a key fundimental in her campaign. How can someome have experience by being the wife of a president. My wife is a surgeon. Does that give me experience to perform surgery? Hillary would not be here if it wasn't for Bill.

Bill   January 21st, 2008 11:49 am ET

1. Why isn't Michele Obama defending "her man" like Bill Clinton is defending "his woman"? She should be countering Bill's misinformation instead of Barack trying to do it. Seems like the media should be asking the question. I like Bill Clinton but his comments, if presented in a court of law, would be impeachable based on his prior conduct. He lied to us back then and no one is calling him on it.

2. Chuck Norris is using "just for men" to color his hair and beard, yet he attacks McCain's age. At least McCain, who is the most honorable of all the candidates, is not trying to disguise who he is. He is banking on voters to consider the fruit he may bear and not the bark he wears.

3. The media is not addressing the change earlier this year (July I think) in the Uptick rule that was established way back to avoid the dramatic changes in the stock market.

4. Should all the candidates agree to undergo a psychological examination? All local and federal law enforcement types who will carry and may use weapons during the performance of their duties must do so before employment. Should not the person who will be in control of the ultimate weapon do the same? Or should we just make a leap of faith that they are stable enough?

5. Why not ask the democrats their positions on the 2nd amendment? Or how they would reduce the amount of drugs coming into the country?

I am an undecided democrat in Maryland and must wait until Feb 12 to cast my vote. So, I am interested in the above issues.

ScottH   January 21st, 2008 11:48 am ET

Interesting that Obama is criticized as whiny, phony, crying, etc. for calling the Clintons out. See definition of projection.

Truth in what the Clinton's say? Please – their "truth" is whatever will get them elected.

Qualifications? Because she lived in the Whitehouse? Everything she touched was disastrous. She supported the war and instead of reconciling that vote with her current position (which remains ambiguous), she deflects criticism to Obama.

Desire to become president? Her campaign is about the country. Really? She chose a state to run for senator based on political ambitions – not residency or need – pure and simple opportunism. We all knew (except for those with their heads in the sand) that this simply a means to an end (sound familiar). And yet – she deflects criticism of her ambitions by digging into Obama's kindergarten records.

Change? the only change we can expect from the Clintons is moving ever closer to the Republican position. The only real change will come when the attempted dynasty fails to be elected either in the primaries or the general election. Which of course will result in cries of foul-play and a right-wing conspiracy.

A Canadian   January 21st, 2008 11:48 am ET

Is it me or does Obama do little more than whine?
Grow up!

RJ   January 21st, 2008 11:47 am ET

I didn't hear Obama complain about support from a "TV idol" such as Oprah - who, by the way, probably has very little to add in terms of political/government experience - only her name, ratings, and bucks. If Hillary gets support from Bill - her husband, former president and governor, highly successful and experienced in politics/government both nationally and globally - that's great. (As I recall, there was no recession looming during the Clinton presidency, we had a budget surplus, the shameful lack of healthcare for every American was courageously brought to the table, we were respected throughout the world). This country needs all the EXPERIENCE it can get in its leaders, especially the president - and Bill Clinton's presence and support will only be a positive factor.

Rose Marie Siano   January 21st, 2008 11:47 am ET

Stop whining!!! This is a presidential campaign. Your wife is certainly not keeping her mouth shut.....GO HILLARY

new york   January 21st, 2008 11:47 am ET

Not sure Bill carries much weight as Oprah. What is he whining about?

He's got the ridiculous hoopla that comes along with Oprah stumping for him, why can't Hillary counteract with Bill?

I'm not voting for either. This just necessitated a comment based on ridiculousness alone.

Ann, MO   January 21st, 2008 11:47 am ET

How is Hillary going to be able to work across party lines in Washington to get things done, and how is she going to be able to work with leaders of foreign countries, if she needs to hide behind the coattails of her husband to take on the young "inexperience" senator. She can't have it both ways, either she is "strong" enough to lead this country, or she is so weak that she needs her husband to come to the rescue. For all of the women in this country that have fought hard to break the glass ceilings that they have, certainly they are cringing at the fact that she needs her husband to do the "hard work" while she sets back and tries to "look soft."

Roger   January 21st, 2008 11:47 am ET

He's also running against the big pharmaceutical companies, the corporate-run media, various foreign lobbies, etc.

I hear that some women are supporting Hillary so that they can tell their daughters that they can be anything they want, even President.

After she wins, they'll also be able to tell their daughters how they helped elect the President who started a brutal war against Iran at the behest of various foreign interests...

eric   January 21st, 2008 11:46 am ET

I'm so sick of this Hillary experience garbage. It needs to be drilled into peoples heads. Staying in a bad marriage does not equal experience.

New Jersey for Hillary   January 21st, 2008 11:46 am ET

CNN keeps deleting my comments in favor of Senator Clinton, why is that? People, please realize that the media wants Obama to win and this is an attempt to influence the election/nomination process. I am for Senator Clinton and I have no issues with what Bill is doing. He is doing what the media should be doing which is to expose inform the public and expose lies. If Obama can't stand the heat then get out of the kitchen! What will he do if he gets the nomination? The republicans will walk over him. Hillary has proven herself to be a fighter and winner. She can take on the republicans and win! There is nothing wrong with a husband supporting his wife. What's next, Obama is going to complain that he is running against 3 Clintons (Chelsea included)? I am a Black mand and I have no problems with Oprah and Obama teaming up on Hillary. Quit complaining, quit the fancy speeches and show us your record, that's if you have any to run on. Show us your works.

Hillary for President!

Katie T.   January 21st, 2008 11:46 am ET

Oh please!! Grow up and quit crying! Welcome to big time politics! The fact that is focusing so much on this tells me that he's feeling intimidated and has lost focus on the issues and his plans for the country. He needs to quit worrying what the Clintons are doing and worry about himself. And while he's at it he needs to tell his wife that she needs to watch what she says, they both are sounding arrogant and combative. He's in a position where a little grace and dignity will go a long way instead of being an embarrassment, trash talk won't get it done. The longer it goes on, the faster the shine is going to tarnish! The votes will show it, the American people aren't stupid!

jinishans   January 21st, 2008 11:46 am ET

Obama is now Crying. Why the press is not covering this. He's crying without tears.

Let his wife now shout Naveda, Naveda, Naveda, Naveda, Naveda, Naveda, Naveda, Naveda, Naveda, Naveda, Naveda, Naveda, Naveda, Naveda, Naveda, Naveda, Naveda, Naveda, Naveda, Naveda, Naveda, Naveda, Naveda, Naveda…

Gail Evans   January 21st, 2008 11:46 am ET

I ask the question: Who is Hillary without Bill? Hillary espouses her 35 years of experience, but those 35 years of experience were gained by riding the coattails of her husband. Hillary was the wife of the Arkansas Attorney General, the wife of the Arkansas Governor, and the wife of the President of the United States. No Arkansas resident could go into New York and win as Senator without being married to the sitting President who won New York in the Presidential election. Everything that Hillary has accomplished over the past 25 to 30 years has come because her husband has paved the way for her through his position and influence. Anybody can accomplish a lot in 35 years if the state Atty General, the Governor, and the President is paving the way for you and running interference for you. If Hillary believes that she has the experience and the right to be President, then I would like to see her do it on her own without Bill again paving the way. On the other hand, Obama has not had a daddy and a spouse as former presidents who are paving the way for him. Everything that he has accomplished he has done on his own. Again I ask: Who is Hillary without Bill?

jinishans   January 21st, 2008 11:45 am ET

Obama is now Crying. Why the press is not covering this. He's crying without tears. Let his wife now shout Naveda, Naveda, Naveda, Naveda, Naveda, Naveda, Naveda, Naveda, Naveda, Naveda, Naveda, Naveda, Naveda, Naveda, Naveda, Naveda, Naveda, Naveda, Naveda, Naveda, Naveda, Naveda, Naveda, Naveda...

Karen   January 21st, 2008 11:45 am ET

I find it interesting that Obama supporters keep saying he is unifying.

AJ, IL   January 21st, 2008 11:45 am ET

Hillary Clinton couldn't handle Bill Clinton in the White house. That's why was able to cheat on her. Hillary can't handle Bill on the campaign trail and won't be handle him in the White House. It will be a conflict of power between Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton if Hillary is elected. Bill's status as a former president and (should be a former) husband will undermine Hillary's authority as president, plain and simple. You don't get two for the price of one. You will get internal bickering just like we had in the 1990s with the only differences being both of them are older and more stubborn.

Dean Ryan   January 21st, 2008 11:45 am ET

The more Obama criticizes President Bill Clinton, the more my Family and I have become more solid in our decision NOT to support the Senator. If memory serves me right, it was he who allowed in one of the earliest fundraisers in California for his contributors to hit the former President.

Joseph   January 21st, 2008 11:44 am ET

For those asking what Obama would do when faced with tough world leaders, I ask you, what will Hillary do?

We've already seen her burst into tears once, remember?

This is the first election that I've ever been excited about and wanted to go out and be a part of since I could vote. I have to honestly say that the reinstatement of the Clinton's would pretty much destroy any faith in the politics of this country that I have left. It would be a long time before I'd want to participate in an election again.

HRC isn't change. HRC is a time warp to a decade ago. Partisan politics headed up by a leader of questionable moral fiber.

Mad Texan   January 21st, 2008 11:44 am ET

What is the matter with the American people. Have you lost your senses. Do you not see where ther economony is going? Think about it, it is not good. Do you have any ideal who can lead this country through these troubling times? Use the brains God has given you. Just up and taking the troops out of Iraq is not the answer. Do you want foreign boots on our soil shooting and raping our women. Think of your children. What will become of them during the next four and later years. You say you want change. What kind of change. Change of color or change of experience. Does anyone know? Ask yourself who can run this country that foreign countries will respect? Or do you just want someone to continuing the comedy? Bush has made America a laughing joke. There is candidates now running that will continue that tradition. Gulliana, Obama, Romney, Thompson, Edwards,and Hucckabee. No way will the Koreas, Red Chinease, Russia and the middle East take these men serious. You need strength in the office of the United States. Therefore, there is only two candidates left that fits these qualifications. McCAIN AND CLINTON. My vote goes for Hillary.

David Florida   January 21st, 2008 11:44 am ET

We certainly should not misrepresent Senator Obama's attitude towards starting and making war.
He voted to help George Bush fund the Iraq war. He states his enthusiasm to offer a 'strike-first' policy.
We should not misrepresent his attitude towards the environment.
He voted for the Bush administration's bill to give oil companies huge tax breaks. He expresses no opposition to plastering hundreds of nuclear power stations across the country.
We should not misrepresent his attitude towards corporate America.
He accuses others from taking donations from drug companies, neglecting to tell us that his campaign does the same thing.
We should not misrepresent his qualities for the chief executive's job.
He tells us that he cannot even organize his own desk. He tells us he is content to leave management to others.
Don't worry Senator.
We will continue to ensure you are not misrepresented and help voters understand just what you do represent.

linda cary   January 21st, 2008 11:43 am ET

Why can't politics be played on a level field? Candidate Obama is an outstanding candidate and would be way ahead if he didn't have to fight both Clintons. Hillary Clinton is doing everything she can to win. Shame, shame, shame.

Bill V.   January 21st, 2008 11:43 am ET

Are we supposed to feel sorry for him? He's pretty specific about his beefs w/ the Clintons but he lacks the same candor and specificity when it comes to his yammering about "change."

I wish he would shutup and get on with it.

Biggdawg, Chicago   January 21st, 2008 11:42 am ET

I notice that Obama keeps whining that Bill is distorting his record, but he never tells us what's distorted...

kay   January 21st, 2008 11:42 am ET

Too bad Obama, stop whining. I can't wait til Super Tuesday, then we can stop hearing about Obama!!! Enjoy South Carolina cause that state is the end of the road for ya!

Kate   January 21st, 2008 11:41 am ET

Another duplicate article...get a new editor, CNN.

Anonymous   January 21st, 2008 11:41 am ET

Does America want to elect a president who cries when she doesn't like a question? Can you see that at a world summit. "The president has to take a break because she is upset at the last comment!

JA   January 21st, 2008 11:41 am ET

Obama is losing focus...that positive campaign thing.
The Democrats keep it up and I'll vote Republican or not at all. Any good Independent's out there???

Chris   January 21st, 2008 11:41 am ET

I am amazed at the people who are saying that Obama should stop "whining" and "take it." Apparently, those folks want a president who doesn't question when someone says something that doesn't jive with the truth. So, by that same logic, when a cabinet member says something in a cabinet meeting that makes absolutely no sense the president is supposed to just "take it?" Personally, I prefer a president who can think and take a stand for what they believe is right, not just say what they believe will get them elected.

Kelly   January 21st, 2008 11:40 am ET

I am a Rebublican and have never voted for a democrat- but I will vote for Barack Obama. If Hillary wins I will vote for whoever will defeat her. Barack can cross over party lines- HIllary can't. Obama for change!

Errick Chiasson   January 21st, 2008 11:39 am ET

If Obama can not handle going up against a New York Senator and Ex-President, how can we expect him to be able to step up to the plate and face the citizens of this nation? Furthermore, how can we expect him to face the tough struggles of the world and its political leaders?

Jimmy Baldwin (SC)   January 21st, 2008 11:39 am ET

So if Obama fights back against the Clinton tag team he's crying?

What a load of tosh.

Grow up.

BNS too   January 21st, 2008 11:39 am ET

C'mon folks..."it all depends on what the definition of 'is' is..."

You and the rest of America have been snowed by the Clintons (and DNC) for a long time. Whining is the way of the Democrat...it is a negative party. Complaints are their way of business. Dems, contrary to popular opinion, have far deeper pockets than the so-called "rich Republicans." She represent no one but herself...you are kidding your selves if you think Dems care about the poor, at least in any other way then keeping them down and addicted to their god of Big Government.

God help the USA if the lemmings on the Left succeed in getting Either Hillary or Obama into office.

AJ, IL   January 21st, 2008 11:39 am ET

All the candidates should be looked at thoroughly and equally. The political news shows like MEET THE PRESS have pressed Obama on tough issues just like Hillary. Hillary just has more garbage to clean up. The media have covered accusations of Obama's ambition to be president in kindergarden and middle school as well as his drug use as a pre-teen. If Obama is subjected this type of coverage why isn't Hillary Clinton or John Edwards past subjected to this type of scrutiny? Why is the media not talking about the young Republican Hillary and her suppport of a presidential candidate who was against the Civils Right Act of 1964?
Past facts like this are far more relevant to politics that Obama's 1st grade "essay" and his pre-teen drug use.

OBAMA in 08!

JFK   January 21st, 2008 11:39 am ET

Obama should know that this is not going to be an easy election. The race for the White House is not going to be cake walk. If he can not handle it, then needs to get out of the election and do not waste our time! The Clintons are a force to be reckoned with and he got their attention, but at least I can say they want the job and won't whine their way getting there!

Bo   January 21st, 2008 11:38 am ET

To Doe,

For the record, Obama did not agree with his pastor on honoring Farrakhan.

Billie   January 21st, 2008 11:38 am ET

Wow it was not Obama that i saw cry my eyes must be lying as i saw
mrs Clinton cry Bill was a good president now just think what young girl would you want working in the white house with Hill so busy keeping papers in order and no time to watch Bill

Jen Cedar Falls, IA   January 21st, 2008 11:37 am ET

TRUTH could NEVER be defined as a virtue of either Bill OR Hillary Clinton.

NEVER!

We as a country deserve BETTER! We NEED an honest President! ABC!

Anyone who still supports Hillary Clinton has GOT to have their stubborn and revengeful head in the sand because the Clinton's have reared their UGLY LYING heads again and the Clintonites are in TOTAL DENIAL about it, making excuses and passing blame as usual. That's all they know, the Clinton's have taught them that!

We citizens of all race, gender and age deserve to fall in love with the USA again and we could NOT POSSIBLY do it by returning the Clinton's to the White House.

It's obvious that the Clinton's have planted their SEEDS OF HATE and LIES again and they will continue to water and nourish that nasty monster until we send them back home!

Bush + Clinton + Bush + Clinton = A hateful and divided America.

Wake up America, I miss your love and I'm weary from your hate! Let's unite! ABC

New Jersey for Hillary   January 21st, 2008 11:35 am ET

As a Black man in his 20's I am proud to support Senator Hillary Clinton! I have no problem with Bill standing up for his wife, that's what any husband would do. Chelsea, continue to stand up for your Mom and Bill continue to believe in your wife.

Hillary '08

norma   January 21st, 2008 11:35 am ET

Oh my, poor Obama, he got his feelings hurt! The same old story that when I am derogatory and find a "pretty" way of demonizing the other party, I can smile and charm people, but when someone with some clout and experience and intelligence has a different point of view – the crying starts.

No one will ever face the hypcrocasy or scurrilous hate mongers that Bill Clinton did – even as President when our country was at peace and economically sound.

So as much as I initially liked Obama – I think as time goes on, it won't just be Bill Clinton he'll be crying about , I think it will be the revelations about his personal life that will surface. The media has been pretty favorable of Obama, where antime they want to slur someone's name, they bring up Bill Clinton. Thank God there are still some Americans who don't caste the first stone and then have to defend themselves when its their turn to be put under the microscope.

Dan   January 21st, 2008 11:34 am ET

Bill Clinton being dishonest?? That must be a first...oh wait...

Karen, MN   January 21st, 2008 11:34 am ET

Looks like Obama can't handle the two Clintons.
Stop whining and fight, Obama! Bill Clinton is doing what a spouse always does. You ain't see nothing yet! Wait till the Republicans get their hands on your record!

I am rooting for you. But stoping complaining and start winning!

db   January 21st, 2008 11:34 am ET

Whiny little baby. Obama reminds me of the first GW Bush campaign ... with a lot of nonsense talk about building unity, but reality struck once Bush got to the white house ... you can't do that in DC. No wonder Obama is not planning to run again if he doesn't make it this year... He'll just be another loud-month, soiled politico in a few years (probably months) no matter what happens in this election.

jorge thompson   January 21st, 2008 11:33 am ET

The Clintons have always worked together.
That's why Bill accomplished so much.
They gave the middle class a great standard of living
Obama is right.
Two is more powerful than one
Hillary has proven her mettle by winning the last 2 debates.
She has my vote. And so does Bill.
Two great presidents for the price of one vote.

Boogie Los Angeles CA   January 21st, 2008 11:33 am ET

And all the nasty stuff and race card rhetoric that Obama's wife says...that's ok.?
Can't have it both ways kid.

This is an election for the biggest toughest political job in the world
...YES...people are aggressive about it.

Politics are a passionate and sometimes aggressive system...If you can't deal with it...go suck your thumb and continue to live in your fantasy world.

Obama spends his whole campaigne demonizing EVERYONE in Washington as broken, corrupt and status quo.

How is that supposed to unify us???

The whole government is NOT broken...needs drastic work...YES...but, last time I checked...my Dad got his social security check,
many people DID recieve life saving medical care at no charge
and our roads are 100 times better than in Mexico.

I will not vote for this "Televangilist" who tries to LIE about how bad the American government is and how HE is somehow the ONLY magical cure.

America doesn't suck!
America is and has always been "A work in progress"
PROGRESS and CHANGE take TIME.

Obama is dividing our party with his message...this is the same type of fear mongering that Bush uses...just on the other side of the fence.

If he said " I'm going to lead by MY example...I'd buy that...he's a great speaker and seems honest (though I've been fooled by many preachers before)...but, to paint himself as the the guy that's going to somehow make career politicians not act like career politicians is completely unrealistic and vain.

Coby   January 21st, 2008 11:33 am ET

I have no problem with Obama being challenged. But shouldn't the person thats running for the nomination be the one to challenge him. Not the spouse. I think people are supporting Hillary because deep down they know that if she gets into the white house she's going to sit in the back seat and Bill will be running the country again. Especially if she puts Bill into the supreme court.

Sammy   January 21st, 2008 11:32 am ET

WRONG !!!

Listen, you whinning light-weight, the only thing you're running against is your own lack of credentials.

How the hell you ever got into the race in the first place is beyond reason.

Robert in Albuquerque   January 21st, 2008 11:32 am ET

Suddenly Obama is the one crying. Didn't everyone pick on Hillary when she cried in N.H? Grow up man. If you can't handle the Clinton's, what makes you think you can handle the world!

Hillary 08!

Richard   January 21st, 2008 11:31 am ET

Obama is not whining! He is merely defending himself from Bill Clinton! Go Obama!

samuel   January 21st, 2008 11:31 am ET

now i am totally confused who is running for president bill or hillary? oh bill i use to give you a lot of credits even my mother she does not know about politics she use to like u a lot .not anymore!!!!!!!!!!!!! the more i know obama the more i like his nomination for president of our lovely united states of America. No matter what senator obam will prevail because he is bening honest and genuine for America people.God bless obama.Amen.

BRG   January 21st, 2008 11:31 am ET

He seems like a sore loser. No one likes a chronic victim. She won Iowa by 6 points and he made no statement acknowledging Hillary's victory. Instead his campaign tries to spin his loss using the extra delegate. Obama should stop blaming the Clintons for his poor performance and focus instead on making his own case to America based on his qualifications. We are smart enough to sort out truth from fiction. I have found Bill Clinton's remarks to be truthful about Barack's war record, which was mixed at best. His speech opposing the war was before he reached the Senate. Once in the Senate, he had the opportunity to be a vocal opponent, and he passed. Maybe he's defensive because there is truth to Bill Clinton's remarks?

warren   January 21st, 2008 11:30 am ET

I would think Hillary Clinton would want it believed she won on her own. If not, should she win, her presidency would be seriously crippled. She does not want to be 'Ma Ferguson' (woman governor of Texas who followed her husband in office) but rather Ann Richards who was the first women governor of Texas in that she was by any means getting votes because of a husband.

Ted   January 21st, 2008 11:30 am ET

Oh, it was ok to pull Oprah into the race, then found
out the voters didn't fall for that Ronald Ragen type
bull crap. Stop crying and start telling the voters
what you can do for this country. Enough is enough!!!!!!!!

JA   January 21st, 2008 11:30 am ET

I didn't trust 'Slick Willy' while he was in office and I trust him even less (if that's even possible) now that he's on the campaign trail. I believe the good cop/bad cop comparison was dead on. Bill can say whatever he wants... for some reason people still respect him.. even though he is a phoney.

Rian Cooney   January 21st, 2008 11:30 am ET

Voted for Bill Clinton twice. This election, I will not vote for his wife, which is, of course, also a vote for him. Each "experienced" Clinton has played that game for far too long. Do you really want eight more years of such a dog & pony show? Still, for me it is the ego and sense of entitlement on display by both, and particularly Bill, that is quickly becoming yet another national embarrassment. This man will do anything, say anything to regain the stage.

We must say no to dynastic politics is our country. And to go back to the tabloid politics of the 90s would just be a disaster for a country in deep trouble on so many fronts. Yet that seems to be the only life of politic life this pathetic man knows how to live. Haven't we had enough for one lifetime?

dennis   January 21st, 2008 11:29 am ET

Poor Obama...What's it going to be like when facing leaders of the world whom disagree with the U.S.? Wow, how weak. I was really begining to stop and take a look at him too.

Tee   January 21st, 2008 11:29 am ET

Well, OBAMA needs a reality check, and well, at least he is gaining some experience of what it takes. It's funny, I do not want a whinnie whiner for president. I want someone that is a leader through and through, talk and walk, can roll up their sleeves and get their hands dirty for the poor and middle class people of this nation. But more importantly: for our CHILDREN! and you know who I trust, who has my vote, and who others will be voting for? HILLARY CLINTON that is who. and I am a LATINA VOTER and PROUD to Vote for HILLARY.

K.WILLIAMS   January 21st, 2008 11:29 am ET

I really fill it's ashame that some of the american people can't see
that this election race that's going on lets face it without BILL i don't think Hillary
would have a chance.
KW,Ca

Nik T - Houston, TX   January 21st, 2008 11:29 am ET

Ohhh... Poor Obama! The Clintons are playing too hard and he doesn't like it. The funny thing is, that his wife is letting her mouth loose to help him out like Bill is helping Hillary, but unfortunately for him, it doesn't carry much of a weight. Well, that's tood bad.

And Obama didn't seem to mind when both him and Edwards ganged up on Hillary a couple of weeks ago. The difference is Hillary survived and prospered, she didn't whine about it.

Grow up, Obama! Whining is not accepted inside the White House, and you're apparently NOT ready to be in it.

Lessie Thomas   January 21st, 2008 11:29 am ET

012108

It is sad that the American people have forgotten what is truth in this country. The truth is that former president Bill Clinton: 1. disrespected the Oval Office by having oral sex with a young college intern, 2. initially, lied to the American people saying he did not have sex with this girl, 3. performed these acts while he was married to Mrs. Hillary Rodham Clinton, which is adultery any which way the actas are viewed. Why should I believe what he is saying about Senator Obama? As a voter I believe I should base my choice on facts from facts and not lies from a liar.

When I check the facts I hear Senator Barack Obama saying on video and in the debates: 1. that he has never endorsed this war but since our young people are over there we must give them the funds and the equipments they need to fight the war and to be safe. 2. that he will put money into the american people and not into the pockets of special interest groups like the insurance companies, 3. that he will see that health insurance is available to every American, 4. that he will bring our troops home and we can no longer referee a civil war. 5. that Americans deserve a tax break. Senator Obama is concerned about povery, single parents, injustice, inequalities, education and the list can go on. I understand his comments on Ronald Reagan. Reagan was not liked because of reaganomics but Reagan did something historically great. He brought down the walls of communism in the Soviet Union. Because of Ronald Reagan, I don't think Americans fear Russia the way we once did when I was growing up.

Hillary has expressed some of the same views yet she is trying to tarnish her opponent's reputation by distorting the truth. Sadly my initial intent was to vote for Hillary because I like the way she handled the old Washington congressional veterans but if it takes her husband coming out to influence this campaign so that she can win then I am not sure she can handle the White House without her husband being a major player. Bill Clinton has had two terms in office. Hillary and Bill have had 35 years according to her to make a different and to bring change. Their approach was not enough. It is impeiative that Americans try something new because we are in trouble with our national security, economics and healthcare. We need Change.

And because I don't want it to be said the Obama campaign is behind this message, my name is Lessie Thomas

The Truth hurts   January 21st, 2008 11:29 am ET

Why is that when Obama calls out a lie, he is labelled as a whiner by the Clinton supporters, but when Hilary cries before the New Hampshire primary, it is completely forgotten? Who is flip-flopping now Clinton supporters?

Coby   January 21st, 2008 11:29 am ET

Hillary is not J.S. with out Bill Clinton. I would rather vote for someone who doesn't have to depend on their spouse to sway voters their way. Anytime Hillary looses control, Bill steps out and sweeps everything up. Sounds like a certain female candidate cant do it without her hubby. :( Imagine what happens in the white house when the other countries starts to punk H.R.C. (and they will)

mikesfca   January 21st, 2008 11:28 am ET

if your going to play with the big boys and Girl get use to it maybe call John Kerrry and ask him for help ... Mr. candidate for change but want John Kerry backing and got it not so much about changer

Michael   January 21st, 2008 11:28 am ET

For the untutored, the Snopes family was Faulkner's creation of conniving, unattractive white racists.

Donna F   January 21st, 2008 11:28 am ET

Mr. Obama, you should have known that when you threw your hat in the ring....

AM   January 21st, 2008 11:28 am ET

barack obama has no experience, what he thinks that he can run a whole country after a mere 2 years in the senate. All he riding on is hope and race. Clinton is playing it smartly, constantly critizing obama. Which then makes it almost necessary for the obama campaign to respond. Then se can tell the public that he is just like every other candidate and to top it all of state that he has no experience. dont fall for hope thats exactly what bush rode on.

KimSC   January 21st, 2008 11:27 am ET

I resent the fact that Obama thinks he is running against Bill. I don't care what someone says, Obama can't possibly win against Hillary because she is a woman and he doesn't know what to do with her. So what is his answer, to "pretend" he is running against Bill. What a joke, if you can't deal with a woman opponent the how can you represent us in the White House. Hillary is not your wife, you can't dimiss her when it suits you. Obama's wife has said some very tough things in this campain, I am sorry she is not as popular as Bill but get over yourself. Your opponent is Hillary, what a disgrace!

Donna F   January 21st, 2008 11:27 am ET

I notice that Hillary Clinton is HIllary, Barrack Obama is Obama.....interesting referral to each one.....a gender thing? Hmmmm other ideas?
Also, both sides need to stick to the issues.....but Barrack the hopeful, started his bid to the WH too soon, too young. I think he was naive about how he could run his campaign, how his own supporters would run his campaign, and I am not speaking about the organization, but the emotions, the back and forths and sensitivities to every comment. When candidates have so much in common then they are starting to grasp at straws...so do not put them out to be grabbed or be suprised when it happens. Perhaps the media can be more objective, less drama oriented also.

Mike, Chicago IL   January 21st, 2008 11:27 am ET

I pray that Clinton does not win the nomination for the presidency.

As an independent voter, I don't see any way that she will get my vote over any of the Republican candidates.

At this point I'm really hoping that Edwards will drop out, endorse Obama, and perhaps we'll see an Obama/Edwards democratic ticket.

A Clinton/(any one else) ticket will never get my vote, and I'm guessing that a lot of independant voters agree with me.

Bev   January 21st, 2008 11:26 am ET

Congrat's to Obama. It takes courage and stamina to run against the Clinton machine period. To be as close, basically tied, to Hillary is a successful achievement to be very proud of no matter what the final outcome is. One many other people wish they could have done or do. They don't have the courage. Hillary and Bill both have had a lot of national and international exposure and recognition before the race even started. Everyone knows their names. They are viewed like American Royalty, at least before this campaign started. Even internationally. It is like a fly running against the Queen of England. The Clintons are wealthy and have many wealthy friends to finance their campaign also they are guaranteed lots of press coverage just because of their name. In comparison Obama and his name were basically unknown. The Clinton;s with all their years in politics and the contacts made are able to call in favors and to remind people of the loyalty owd to them. They also owe people favors. I do hope that the black community is voting for the candidate based on the issues and not on a sense of loyalty to a candidate or because of jealousy that it isn't one of them or their generation that dared to run for the nomination and not the young upstart. Martin Luther King would be very proud of Obama and this day. Whether or not he would have voted for him we will never know, but we do know it would have been for the best candidate.

Saundra Tucson   January 21st, 2008 11:26 am ET

I have been reading the posts for this subject and am amazed at some of the responses. First of all, this is a campaign people. The way campaigns have been run in the past, are run now and will be run in the future is to point out your competitors weaknesses, failures, and the make sure your message is heard. Politicans have used and will continue to use those forces, and people to get their points of view across to the potential voters. Of course,they are going to use everything in their arsenal. Obama included. I totally resent you all bringing in the absolute fact that God is on Obama's side. Who says??? The whole thing is getting out of hand. Everyone says that Obama is going to change the way Washington does business. Obviously, a lot of you don't understand the system. A President cannot, by virtue of the Constitution(oops, yes I think we still have one) do the changing. He or she can influence potential change, but the last time I checked, we still have a Congress and a judiciary system. The reigns of change are in their hands. So, people, ask the question, who are the candidates going to try to appoint in Cabinet, in the judiciary system, etc, that will help to make the changes??? If for one minute you all don't think this is the most important point, think again. It hasn't been Bush that has done everything by himself. It is all of his advisors that have piloted this mess that we are all in.
Galloping generalities are just that. You all seem to think that by saying that there will be change, it will happen. In the final analysis we all are going to have to choose and it shouldn't be based on how much you "like' the candidate, but how much that candidate will be able to compromise with the people that can make changes.

Tamika Jackson   January 21st, 2008 11:26 am ET

For years Hillary Clinton stood by and kept silent as her husband had affairs with numerous different women. If this woman cannot manage her own house how is she going to manage the White House? She is not owed the White House for keeping silent. Her husband may owe her something but the American people do not.

Maurice   January 21st, 2008 11:26 am ET

We are the Clinton. Lower your standards. Your hope will be assimilated. Resistance is futile.

J. Lawrance   January 21st, 2008 11:26 am ET

I'm following the primaries with keen interest. I guess Obama should really expose the Clintons for their values other than announce his intentions. Look for their weakness. Hillary has no experience at all, perhaps as a former fast lady. That experience Obama will never have. It appears they have no issues to boost their campaigns other than attack him.

DB   January 21st, 2008 11:26 am ET

I don't think it is whining. What about the so-called list of 80 attacks Obama did on Clinton? People look back at the 90s fondly but that administration did little in the long run. Perhaps if we took more action in the 1990s towards Iraq we wouldn't be stuck were we are. Notice I said perhaps.

Same with EPA and the environment, now time is running out and I don't want another Boomer running the country and leaving the inheriting generation with nothing.

Sam C, Ft. Myers, Fl   January 21st, 2008 11:26 am ET

Quit whinning and gets some balls. This election is hardball.

WAKE UP AMERICA!!!   January 21st, 2008 11:25 am ET

RIGHT ON, MELANIE!!!

charlotte   January 21st, 2008 11:25 am ET

If you comment is not negative it will sit in moderation Now I know why all of these comments are so negative. CNN, National Enquirer,Globe, Star all owned by Time-Warner. The same news over and over and over again is boring, throw in some controversy

Michael   January 21st, 2008 11:25 am ET

Senator Obama is transparently correct. He could make an old, "rich" Republican like me vote for him especially after his gracious remarks about President Reagan. Senator Obama is a gentleman about the Snopes family, albeit one that is fat and rich.

GO HILLARY GO !!!   January 21st, 2008 11:25 am ET

You GO Girl...

OBAMA'S NOT MAN ENOUGH TO BE PRESIDENT, BUT HILLARY IS...

HEY ... BARACK DO YOU WANT SOME CHEESE WITH THAT WINE!

BOO HOO HOO.. POOR BARACK...CAN SOMEONE HELP HIM, THIS IS TOOOO MUCH FOR HIM! MRS. OBAMA SHOULD BE RUNNING SHE HAS MORE GUTS THAN BARACK.....

Robert   January 21st, 2008 11:24 am ET

Is Barack Obama's war position inconsistent?

Senator Barack Obama, then an Illinois state senator, delivered these remarks October 2, 2002 at the Federal Plaza in Chicago:
"I stand before you as someone who is not opposed to war in all circumstances. The Civil War was one of the bloodiest in history, and yet it was only through the crucible of the sword, the sacrifice of multitudes, that we could begin to perfect this union and drive the scourge of slavery from our soil.
I Don't Oppose All Wars
I don't oppose all wars. My grandfather signed up for a war the day after Pearl Harbor was bombed, fought in Patton's army. He fought in the name of a larger freedom, part of that arsenal of democracy that triumphed over evil. I don't oppose all wars. After September 11, after witnessing the carnage and destruction, the dust and the tears, I supported this administration's pledge to hunt down and root out those who would slaughter innocents in the name of intolerance, and I would willingly take up arms myself to prevent such tragedy from happening again.
Opposed to Dumb, Rash Wars
I don't oppose all wars. What I am opposed to is a dumb war. What I am opposed to is a rash war. What I am opposed to is the cynical attempt by Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz and other armchair, weekend warriors in this administration to shove their own ideological agendas down our throats, irrespective of the costs in lives lost and in hardships borne. What I am opposed to is the attempt by political hacks like Karl Rove to distract us from a rise in the uninsured, a rise in the poverty rate, a drop in the median income, to distract us from corporate scandals and a stock market that has just gone through the worst month since the Great Depression. That's what I'm opposed to. A dumb war. A rash war. A war based not on reason but on passion, not on principle but on politics.
On Saddam Hussein
Now let me be clear: I suffer no illusions about Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal man. A ruthless man. A man who butchers his own people to secure his own power…. The world, and the Iraqi people, would be better off without him. But I also know that Saddam poses no imminent and direct threat to the United States, or to his neighbors…and that in concert with the international community he can be contained until, in the way of all petty dictators, he falls away into the dustbin of history.
I know that even a successful war against Iraq will require a U.S. occupation of undetermined length, at undetermined cost, with undetermined consequences.
I know that an invasion of Iraq without a clear rationale and without strong international support will only fan the flames of the Middle East, and encourage the worst, rather than best, impulses of the Arab world, and strengthen the recruitment arm of al-Qaeda.
I am not opposed to all wars. I'm opposed to dumb wars. So for those of us who seek a more just and secure world for our children, let us send a clear message to the president.
You Want a Fight, President Bush?
You want a fight, President Bush? Let's finish the fight with Bin Laden and al-Qaeda, through effective, coordinated intelligence, and a shutting down of the financial networks that support terrorism, and a homeland security program that involves more than color-coded warnings. You want a fight, President Bush? Let's fight to make sure that…we vigorously enforce a nonproliferation treaty, and that former enemies and current allies like Russia safeguard and ultimately eliminate their stores of nuclear material, and that nations like Pakistan and India never use the terrible weapons already in their possession, and that the arms merchants in our own country stop feeding the countless wars that rage across the globe. You want a fight, President Bush? Let's fight to make sure our so-called allies in the Middle East, the Saudis and the Egyptians, stop oppressing their own people, and suppressing dissent, and tolerating corruption and inequality, and mismanaging their economies so that their youth grow up without education, without prospects, without hope, the ready recruits of terrorist cells.
You want a fight, President Bush? Let's fight to wean ourselves off Middle East oil through an energy policy that doesn't simply serve the interests of Exxon and Mobil.
Those are the battles that we need to fight. Those are the battles that we willingly join. The battles against ignorance and intolerance. Corruption and greed. Poverty and despair."
Barack Obama delivered his powerful speech at the Federal Plaza in Chicago October 2, 2002 against the US beginning war in Iraq while later that same month Hillary Clinton voted for the authorization to begin US military action in Iraq. Once US troops were actually in Iraq and fighting a war, of course, it would be irresponsible for Obama to be against funding the troops. The key is that Barack Obama had the judgment to see the dumbness of the war in October 2002 and clearly said so. Hillary Clinton did not and voted to start it.

Bill and Hillary Clinton's tactic of trying to paint Obama's war position as "a fairy tale" or as "inconsistent" is merely "Clinton politics" and clearly demonstrates why America badly needs the enormous breath of fresh air Barack Obama provides. At one time Senator Kerry from Nebraska referred to the Clinton's as "clever liars" several years before President Bill Clinton told America: "I did not have sex with that woman!" or as Jay Leno quipped, "He didn't have sex with her, she had it with him!"

Goodbye Bill and Hillary Clinton. Hello Barack Obama.

Dale   January 21st, 2008 11:24 am ET

As a Democrat I think we've already lost in '08. Hillary and Bill are so divisive that Independents and Obama Democrats won't vote for them and now Hillary supporters are claiming they won't support Obama if he is elected. So we've lost again. It's really going to suck watching Congress battle it out with Plastic Mitt Romney but thats our cross to bear.

Farrell, Houston, Tx   January 21st, 2008 11:24 am ET

Obama running against the axis of evil, Bill and Hillary. They will do and say anything to distort the truth and they don't want the Clinton library opened because they know voters would not support them. Why isn't anyone demanding the truth about the Clintons before making an uninformed decision to support them.

case   January 21st, 2008 11:22 am ET

I wonder if the people here still mentioning Obama's Reagan statement have taken anytime to listen to the actual statement. He was talking about having a lasting affect on the course of the nation. Reagan (to our detriment) did do that. Can America please start acting like we have more than a 3rd grade political education and take an astute observation for what it is. In all reality his statement was roughly equal to Hillary's LBJ statement. (which I am glad Obama apologized for his campaigns use of.) Lets see if Hillary continues to misuse Obama's statement.

chris   January 21st, 2008 11:22 am ET

what is wrong with you people!! "cry baby" "whiner" and hillary isn't...she is too. either she shouldn't be running her campaign like this......its dirty and it is not moral. is this how americans try to win!! NO ITS NOT!

dan, tx   January 21st, 2008 11:21 am ET

Bill Clinton is a liar.

Bill Clinton has horrible judgment. We can not tolerate his presence in the White House again.

We need a leader with good judgment. That is Barack Obama.

I will fight for Obama for president.

I will fight against Clinton for president.

Obama vs. McCain. Obama wins.

Clinton vs. McCain. McCain wins.

Eric in Massachusetts - still awaiting moderation   January 21st, 2008 11:21 am ET

Gerri, look at your last two sentences. Statements like yours are what will lessen Obama's support. Keep it up, it works for me, as I have never thought Obama was ready for prime time.

CNN, you have moderated every one of my posts on this thread. Not sure if the moderator here is stumping for Obama?

Baracka Hussein Obama, the great uniter, is on a crash course with destiny… self destruction. February 5th my friends. He and his campaign are already starting to crumble.

What's wrong Baracka? Is Oprah and Usher on your campaign trail not enough for you? I can't fathom that a political candidate is complaining because his opponent's spouse is involved in the campaign. He's crying foul. Unbelievable. Well, at least the American people are beginning to see the real Baracka Hussein Obama. The crybaby. Is Hillary crying to the press that Oprah is stumping for Obama?

The Baracka Hussein Obama campaign is showing their inexperience and lack of class. They never put a stop to the racist ads in Nevada. Obama never congratulates Hillary on her wins. Too bad. This is the guy you want to run the largest super power in the World? I don't think so.

Jim   January 21st, 2008 11:21 am ET

Thank goodness Bill Clinton is finally getting called out for this! He is an utter disappointment as a former president. I used to respect him a great deal until his recent unethical and unnecessary attacks against Obama. These false attacks are reminding me how divided the 90s were, and how the actions of the Clintons made the right wing powerful enough to do the terrible things it did in the early 2000s (which Hillary Clinton supported as a Senator). I'm so sick of the divisive politics of the Clintonian past, and what it did to our country. The Clinton-Bush politics of cynicism and fear is destroying our country, and we need a new direction.
Bill Clinton may be overplaying his hand here. He is well liked by many (formerly including myself). However, many people may LIKE him, but that doesn't mean the FORGIVE him and want the Clintons back in the White House again.

1971guy   January 21st, 2008 11:21 am ET

Ohhh, poor baby; now should we vote for you b/c your a down trotten black man?

Sam   January 21st, 2008 11:21 am ET

I don't see how having the "Clinton" last name and campaigning together is any less fair than President Bush's use of the "Bush" last name, having his father appear at campaigns on his behalf. I have to say that I am disappointed in Obama AND Clinton for ever turning on each other, as they both represent Democrats, as well as groups that historically triumphed through unification. As far as I'm concerned, this article is just about crying "no fair" because Clinton has a perceived advantage that Obama has to compete with. Boo hoo. Need I remind you, the whole Clinton last name is also hurting her campaign, as you can see by some of the comments above.

tracey   January 21st, 2008 11:20 am ET

Funny how any comments against Barack Obama are Racist...

Michelle Obama needs to take a "CHILL" pill too...she has a BIG MOUTH!

Hillary is going to win this Horse RACE (PUN)...so YOU might as well get support her now or turn Right now.

Wayne   January 21st, 2008 11:20 am ET

The Clinton's have lost my respect. If Hillary is the face of the party at the end of this primary season I guess I will have to leave the party. George Bush also is related to a former President, however, G. Bush Sr. made it a point to stay out. To allow his son to win or lose on his own merrit. The Clinton's lack this kind of dignity however. They will win at all costs, even if it means lying, supressing votes or using a former President to create division within the black community.

Here is a question. Can Hillary run and win ON HER OWN. Or is it as I suspected. She is NOTHING without Bill.

rich   January 21st, 2008 11:20 am ET

I will not be voting for Hillary or Billary either in the primary election in my state nor the general election if she was to get the nomination. I would rather sit out the general election than vote for her. If I can suvive all these terrible years of Bush, I will survive another Republican in the White House.

jimmy   January 21st, 2008 11:20 am ET

I love all the people saying Obama needs to stop whining...Hope Bill can come to Hills rescue if she becomes president too. A black man in the U.S. can feel proud about how Obama has portrayed himself so far, but the Clinton's are setting women back a few decades...

When losing the race she fakes like she is going to shed some tears, when being attacked she gets her husband involved....

Please not from my next president... At this point I'd rather have another Bush than Clinton...

Tony, Tulsa, OK   January 21st, 2008 11:19 am ET

Obama has an uphill struggle to win the nomination, and sniping at the most beloved Democrat in the country isn't going to help him. He wants Democrats to be won over by the argument that he'll be a Democratic Reagan. Great. That will win over primary voters, for sure.

Maurice   January 21st, 2008 11:19 am ET

We are the Clinton. You will be assimilated. Your philosophical and political distinctiveness will be added to our own. Resistance is futile.

Can't you just wait to be part of the Clinton Collective.

Obama 08

sick of it   January 21st, 2008 11:19 am ET

To all the geniuses calling Obama's criticism of Clinton "whining."
Was it "whining" when HRC staged a cry episode in a coffee shop? You criticized the media for calling it crying. But now, Obama critiques Clinton–a fair thing to do–and it's called whining!
Quit being hypocrites!!!

kess   January 21st, 2008 11:19 am ET

I'm sure Barack Hussein Obama isn't ready to sit in the Oval Office. Why whine about Bill?
Who does he refer to as the establishment candidate?
Who did he say runs textbook washington Politics?
Who did he say was bush-Cheney Lite?
Who did he say was pushing a politic of fear?
He started the attacks and now he is playing victim. When they rolled out Mitchelle Obama as the finisher, did they expect Hillary to go look out for Maldeline Albright to support her? Barack has lost all rights to remain in this race and the blacks in South Carolina had better not set back the nation's dream of equality by voting for a candidate simply because of the colour of his skin. We must come to equity with clean hands. If we demand blacks treat us by what we deserve, then we must treat them by what they earn and needless to say that the Clintons have earned the support of all blacks in this nation because they just did not wake up in their support of the black community. Their support predates Barack's candidacy

John, CA   January 21st, 2008 11:19 am ET

Obama has been given a free ticket on his drug use, as has his wife
with some of her outrageous comments. Everyone seems to be
afraid to criticize them because of their race. (And) yet, Obama is
not afraid to play the race card when it suits him. He is a "Slick Willy"
who can't take it when he's treated as an equal–he cries "foul".
Welcome to the real world, Obama. You're not at mock trial at Harvard
Law School any longer.

Abi   January 21st, 2008 11:18 am ET

Isnt Michelle campaigning for you as well? Mr Obama!!!! Your campaign sent all the spinning all around when Oprah is gonna campaign for you, despite it all Clinton is winning.... Michelle is campaigning as hard as Bill is doing the same... because one's got more star power than the other doesnt make you a victim... AMERICA NEEDS A PRESIDENT THAT CAN WEATHER IT ALL.. And Clinton has proven so...

GO HILLARY '08!!!

Steve   January 21st, 2008 11:18 am ET

Voters Beware....if you elect Hillary, you get Bill too. If Hillary is in the White House, who do you think will really be running the show?

Jan   January 21st, 2008 11:18 am ET

Being the first African American president is not for the faint hearted or weak. He will take heat from ALL sides – the Sharptons of the world, the media, the white extremists. Every move he make will be raked over the coals by someone, so if he's whining at this stage with this tiny amount of pressure, it doesn't bode well for his presidency – let along a race with the republicans.

Obama supporter   January 21st, 2008 11:17 am ET

How come when the Hillary clinton campaign's was cribbing you all didnt say that she was a cry baby, when she actually did almost cry.
I hope we americans can see through these crooked clinton tactics, and get yourself informed about what Obama stands for.
Obama is too good really to to running against the power hungry clintons anyways.
I hope obama finds the strength and support to face the bullies called clintons.

Go Obama.

Lee   January 21st, 2008 11:17 am ET

Between 1993 and Jan. 2001, my life was the best it has ever been. The economy was great; I could FINALLY get a student loan to go to college (allowing me to subsequently graduate from college); I bought a house, several cars, etc.; and there was peace in the world, overall.

Between 2001 and now, the economy is in the toilet, BIG business has taken priority over middle-class citizens of this country, MANY people I know have had to file for bankruptcy, the U.S. is in a war that NEVER should have taken place to begin with, and the Constitution of the United States has been stomped on by an arrogant, Republican dictatorship known as the Bush Administration (led by Darth Cheney).

Do I think a young, inexperienced, three-year junior senator whose only other experience is serving as a state senator from Illinois is prepared to serve as the President of the United States and change the deep-rooted, horrible things that have resulted from the Bush Administration? No, I do not. Obama is charasmatic, intelligent, and presidential material in about 10 years from now. President John F. Kennedy had 14 years of experience in the House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate prior to becoming president. Three years just doesn't cut it for me.

You cannot tell me Senator Clinton was not a hands-on, senior advisor to her husband during his eight-year term. Has there been any other first lady who had as many hands-on policy work situations resulting in positive change? Look it up. Yeah, Senator Clinton's health care reform didn't go very far, but other good things came out of it. AND she was the only person in D.C. who had the "balls" to take on the daunting task of health care refom. No one else has even come close to tackling it at the level she did. In addition, Senator Clinton has served for seven years in the U.S. Senate–over double what Obama's served. Plus, she brings one of the greatest U.S. presidents in the history of our country as her senior advisor. I, as a taxpayer, am getting TWO stellar, time-tested, hard-working, experienced in the D.C. rat-race individuals to run this country and pull it out of the Republican toilet for the price of one!

So, the question is, do WE, the citizens of this once great country, want an inexperienced candidate who has a MAJOR learning curve when it comes to presiding over a Democratic administration in the White House to take on the hard work it's going to take to turn this country back around after eight years of the worst presidency in the history of this nation, or do WE, the citizens of this once great country, want an experienced, successful legislator, who is not afraid to tackle daunting issues to roll up her sleeves (and her husband, one of the most successful former presidents in the history of our country, to roll up his sleeves as well) and get down to business right away, not having a learning curve, and clean up the Republican mess that Bush has done to damage our country? The choice is VERY clear.

Clinton in 2008!

Unsigned   January 21st, 2008 11:16 am ET

Sen Obama:

The Clintons are a warm-up & if you feel you have two strong challengers, standby & prepare for the full-fledged Republican attack machine.

You have had it 'too easy' - Politics and leading is about staying focused when others attack your vision.

This is just the beginning.

Jennifer   January 21st, 2008 11:16 am ET

I wish Obama would stop acting like a cry baby who everyone is picking on and start to address the issues. Nobody else is acting like him – all the other candidates are acting in a dignified manner, including Hillary. We don't need a leader for our country who has the "everybody is picking on me" syndrome. Stand up, be a man, and address the issues!

Rick   January 21st, 2008 11:16 am ET

Gerri, they did not falsly accuse him of bringing race into it. . . there was a four page document (from Obama's SC campain) maping out different ways to distort Hillary's words to make it sound like she was racist.

Now, of course, Obama has denounced this and claims that he didn't know anything about it. . . sounds like Hillary's not the only one using the good cop / bad cop routine.

LF   January 21st, 2008 11:16 am ET

Stop the bickering! If they do not stop I am going to vote for Huckabee... NOT!

Poli   January 21st, 2008 11:16 am ET

What hp really meant:

"Hillary 08.
She represents people with annual incomes below $50,000. She represents all races. She represents the illiterates!" :)

Go Hillary!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Tia   January 21st, 2008 11:15 am ET

HP you are kidding right? In a debate, Hillary clearly said that families making $97,500 were middle-class and "regular" people. I don't know everything but I know most Americans aren't making that much.

Sherm Brooklyn, NY   January 21st, 2008 11:14 am ET

"January 21, 2008 10:23 am ET

Obama, just call him a racist again like Al Sharpton told you originally to do. That tactic seems to work for you.

I want to live in an America where I won't be accused of being a racist just because I DISAGREE with Obama.

Support the Republican Party."

Nobody cares if you don't support Obama and most of us liberals would never call you a racist for not doing so. Go ahead... vote for the Republicans who employ the "either you're with us or you're against us" tactic. This is the kind of backward thinking coming from the Republican Party.

redwoods   January 21st, 2008 11:14 am ET

Could CNN be anymore slanted towards Obama? They want him running against the republicans, because thats the only way the republicans can win.

PETER ORIAVWOTE   January 21st, 2008 11:14 am ET

Obama should know better politically. Political success is a matter of "the end justifies the means". Just as Michelle campaigns for Obama so Bill has to campaign for Hillary. It just happens that Bill is a former American President and a powerful Democrat with a formidable political machinery.

william walsh columbus ohio   January 21st, 2008 11:13 am ET

yeh ,i know i didnt proof read that very well, just go on,(smile) ill try harder next time, its like making a big deal out of nothing and then wishing you never said it! but everyones already seen or herd it ,!!!

Gil - California   January 21st, 2008 11:13 am ET

Bill Clinton is a jerk and will never change his ways. He will say or do anything to get back into the office. He legacy is being tarnished right now and he is too near-sighted to see it.

JJM   January 21st, 2008 11:13 am ET

Obama supporters need to first realize that Bill Clinton is a Spouse first. If I was running for something and my spouse did not stick up for me I am not sure she should be my spouse. Secondly Michelle Obama is out supporting Her husband and slinging mud too and she should if she thinks her husband is not getting a fair shake. I am not going to support anyone whose spouse will not come to the defense of her husband or wife.

Lets look just a few months ago when Edwards wife was out making comments about Hillary and Obama. Was anyone crying then? No the campaigns were just putting out information to explain why she was incorrect.

The bottomline is that Bill Clinton should speak out for his wife as well as Michelle Obama should. Then we as voters should look at the sources and process the infirmation accordingly.

If Obama is saying that Bill Clinton comments carries to much wait isn't he really saying that the voters are not smart enough to see that his spouse is running and he is sticking up for his spouse

Jim   January 21st, 2008 11:13 am ET

Thank goodness Bill Clinton is finally getting called out for this! He is an utter disappointment as a former president. I used to respect him a great deal until his recent unethical and unnecessary attacks against Obama. These false attacks are reminding me how divided the 90s were, and how the actions of the Clintons made the right wing powerful enough to do the terrible things it did in the early 2000s (which Hillary Clinton supported as a Senator). I'm so sick of the divisive politics of the Clintonian past, and what it did to our country. The Clinton-Bush politics of cynicism and fear is destroying our country, and we need a new direction.
Bill Clinton may be overplaying his hand here. He is well liked by many (formerly including myself). However, many people may LIKE him, but that doesn't mean the FORGIVE him and want the Clintons back in the White House again.

kevin from alaska   January 21st, 2008 11:13 am ET

I also like when Hillary supporters criticize Obama for "whining." Do people already forget her "crying" episode?

tracey   January 21st, 2008 11:12 am ET

Go HIllary Go.

Tom Davie   January 21st, 2008 11:12 am ET

Notice how not ONE IOTO of this has to do with the issues?

Scott the Keeper (atl06)   January 21st, 2008 11:12 am ET

Funny thing... I post a comment that says," Clinton 08" or "Clinton is the best" and it skips right past moderation...lol Who's the moderator??? Must be Bill...

BB   January 21st, 2008 11:12 am ET

Every single person on here needs to do a little growing up. When the Clintons make disparaging comments about Obama, the Obama fans whine. Previously, when Obama said nothing in return, everyone whined that he wasn't standing up for himself. Now, he is standing up for himself, and more people are whining. This is politics! Of course Bill wants to help his wife win! Of course Obama is going to try to distinguish his real views from what the Clintons are saying his views are! And obviously, all of them are going to use whatever resources they have in their power to win (ie Oprah, Bill, even Chuck Norris). If this seems like meaningless bickering to you, then please just turn the television off. All politicians are going to act this way. If you are looking for what they stand for, then do some research on the candidates, find out what their voting record is, discover what they have said they would do in the past, and what they actually did.

v.ananthan   January 21st, 2008 11:11 am ET

OBAMA GROW UP ..
There are more MEN waiting for you in the republican party...

Karen L. Reimer, Mt. Bethel, PA   January 21st, 2008 11:11 am ET

A vote for Hillary Clinton is a vote for the Republican Party. KARL ROVE IS FOR HILLARY CLINTON! He knows the Republican Party can win the election if Mrs. Clinton becomes the Democratic nominee. Half of the country already despises her and since the primary's began in January ,she and her husband have managed to alienate half of the Democratic Party. Due to her "leadership skills" one half of the Democrats will either vote Republican or not vote at all if she becomes the Presidential Candidate for the Democratic Party. Get real, give me a break! Educate yourselves, get a reality check! Go ahead and vote for Hillary Clinton and face 4 more devastating years of Republican rule.

French   January 21st, 2008 11:11 am ET

Someone needs to update your news commentator, Jessica Yellin. She just said in a news report that John Edwards is from South Carolina..... In face she made the comment twice.

Check your facts...... Edwards is from North Carolina where he is NOT appreciated for his politics.

tc   January 21st, 2008 11:10 am ET

Barack created this problem..by forcing Hillary Clinton to run against the legacy of Martin Luther King, instead of forcing her to run against Barack Obama. Notice that once the Clinton's (by force of necessity) brought up the role of Lyndon Johnson in the civil rights movement, Barack immediately switched gears, and began to invoke the legacy of Ronald Reagan.

Barack needs to run as HIMSELF, not as JFK, RFK, MLK...and now, Reagan. The fact that Barack recently named Ronald Reagan up as a leader who brought POSITIVE change to our country is worrisome. Reagan created the recession which followed Reaganomics; Reagan actively attacked unions (which now makes us less safe on airplanes); Reagan attacked the poor. The fall of the Soviet Union began with changes made by Jimmy Carter (and ended with Reagan / Bush being in bed with the Taliban!).

Obama is no different than George W. Bush, in terms of his message (change, bringing people together) so beware of betting on 'message'. The question at hand: once the real Obama is revealed...whose interests will her represent. With a hero like Ronald Reagan (and his close alliance with Goldman Sachs and the DLC), I think that we can guess.

Debo   January 21st, 2008 11:10 am ET

The sad part of the whole debate is how once again, divisivness is the name of the game. Yes, we know politics encourages people's passions. There have been excesses on both sides. The difference here is that Bill Clinton has gone off the edge. Not because he is the husband of the candidate but because he is a former President and once again we have to wonder if he has respect for the office. I voted for him and I might be able to vote for her if it comes down to that decision. But at this point, I'm finding it harder and harder to do just that. I frankly do not want to return to the 90s and these first years of the 21st century. Have we not had enough of the slash and burn politics that not only turn people off from getting involved and wanting to take responsibility for their government but that stalemates any type of governance once getting elected when having to face opponents in the Congress. Power is not the name of the game, and labeling your opponent as evil is not going to get our problems solved. Only governing will help real people. With all due respect to the Clintons, I have to give my vote to Obama. The 'times they are a changing'. And this is the biggest thing we can change. Because no matter how much you think the economics of the 90s were due to Bill Clinton and I think there is some real question as to whether he was responsible or whether it was due to the dot.com explosion, nothing will get done without compromise and decent discourse. The Clintons have not yet learned that they can play that role.

Tom, Rockport ME   January 21st, 2008 11:10 am ET

Yes– Obama is running against both Clintons. Guess what– when Hillary wins the nomination, the Republicans will have to run against both of them too. BONUS!

Scott the Keeper (atl06)   January 21st, 2008 11:10 am ET

If you're always awaiting moderation, does that mean that they will never put your comments on... That seems to happen quite a bit if the argument raised doesn't following a pre-determined path...

Max   January 21st, 2008 11:09 am ET

Obama,

Quite crying, politics is a nasty dirty street fight. Either come prepared or get out, it will only get worse in the next step.

If your successful in getting the nomination the republicans will pound you with every bit of dirt and lies they can think off.

Think of this as a training excersise for the real thing, Politics ain't for the faint hearted.

kevin from alaska   January 21st, 2008 11:09 am ET

8 years ago the Republicans nominated a candidate because he shared the same last name as their previous president. They thought they were getting more of the same of the Reagan/Bush fun. The laughter stopped a long time ago.

If you think you're getting more of the same, take a look at Bill Clinton's tone today compared to Clinton's tone even as late as his impeachment hearings. Completely different.

Mike, Houston, TX   January 21st, 2008 11:09 am ET

Obama is not only up against both Clintons, he is up against the entrenched political establishment of Washington DC. In Nevada, he was challenged by Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton and Harry Reid. Hillary's call for "change" is proved hypocritical by the supporters she has from the current crop of political misfits.

Go 'Bama!

Ben, New York   January 21st, 2008 11:08 am ET

Jeff,

As a Republican i am relieved and impressed that the other side and independents are seeing what the Republicans have been seeing for the past 15 years. Your breakdown of what Hillary really is is one of the better things I have read on CNN and thats impressive considering your commenting on an article.

Your point about Hillary trying to implement a health care plan while she was the first lady is something i never really thought of. Its true – this woman wasnt voted into ANYTHING, what gave her the right to put herself into that situation......i understand that the first lady should have a responsibility to take on certain roles, but i also think they should be limited to promoting good will – NOT assuming she is now part of the political process because her husband was voted in.

Bottom line is it was a great comment – I would love to see some of these tunnel vision democrats open their eyes to what is being fed to them.

All i need to know about the Democrats is that they know its a good thing for them if we were to lose the war – I'm assuming this is why Reid and Pelosi are so adament about proclaiming defeat even in the face of victory.....think about that.

Wufpakmom   January 21st, 2008 11:08 am ET

You don't get to be president of the United States without a huge degree of ruthlessness in your character and for all of his affable, "BubbaBoy" image, the rest of America is now seeing that unattractive quality clearly in the former president.

I applaud Sen. Obama for his unwillingness to descend into the pits of "business as usual" presidential politics. But I wonder if a small bit of history isn't going to be repeated. In 1972, one of George McGovern's aids told the candidate that he was going to be deeply disappointed because "The American people are not as good as you think they are."

Nor are we, if we cannot see through the Clinton's scorched earth policy. Sen. Clinton has shown a consistent willingness to let others do the dirty work for her, and I doubt that will change should she gain the White House. This is being "ready on day one?"

We will get the president we deserve. God help us.

kevin from alaska   January 21st, 2008 11:08 am ET

8 years ago the Republicans nominated a candidate because he shared the same last name as their previous president. They thought they were getting more of the same of the Reagan/Bush fun. The laughter stopped a long time ago.

Peter Noble   January 21st, 2008 11:08 am ET

I used to defend former-president Clinton but no more. This man lacks class and is willing to say anything so Hilary can win. Her crazed looks when winning and misty eyes when losing remind me of Nixon.

Susan   January 21st, 2008 11:08 am ET

How come it is okay for Obama to use his wife and whomever he pleases (ie... Oprah) to work on his campaign but it is not okay for Hillary?

Barbara   January 21st, 2008 11:07 am ET

The Clinton's have NO morals or integrity. Bill must think we have forgotten that he lied big time when he was in office. When I hear either of them speak, my first thought is that they are lying as usual. It's all about ego and power for them, they could care less about the American people and their promises he made and she has made. Talk is cheap, they'll say and do anything to get what they want. I wish they would go away and stay away

New Yorker, NYC, NY   January 21st, 2008 11:07 am ET

I am never going to vote for a whiner. At first i was going vote for whoever the Dems nominated I am Hillary Supporter. Know I see what kind of man Obama is a Whiner and Mudslinger.
I going vote for Republican if he wins nom.

Casey, Orlando, Florida   January 21st, 2008 11:07 am ET

Bill Clinton needs to stay out of race. He is not running for office. His wife is running. I used to respect Bill Clinton, but he went too far more than what is necessary to get everything for his wife. I am supporting Obama.

Sebastian   January 21st, 2008 11:06 am ET

As a democrat I am deeply offended by Senator Barack Obama's recent remarks . In one sweeping sentence he has expressed admiration for a Republican president and put Bill Clinton in the same category as the disgraced Richard Nixon... that was low Senator...Dont touch Bill Clinton.. It is not going to get u the democratic nomination

Serge Crawford   January 21st, 2008 11:06 am ET

I love the Clintons.. they know how to win the game.... If my spouse was running and we had a relationship like the Clintons i would expect the same type of support..

Bush used Laura on many occasion to smooth out his S...t.. We all should be so lucky to have a spouse that can pitch hit for us..and if you dont you married the wrong person..you have two smart people who love the political process and know how to get the job done and support each other!!!!

Michelle is no light weight..maybe she needs to speak up more.. Welcome to the big leagues Obama..all is fair game in politics... so chalk it up and stay on point

Dan, NJ   January 21st, 2008 11:05 am ET

1. I read somewhere that there is an ethical rule that former presidents are not supposed to campaign. Does anyone know if this is true? We did not see George H.W. Bush campaign for his son. I don't think it would shock anyone if Bill was defying ethical considerations.

2. Who is so naive as to compare the influence of Michelle Obama or Elizabeth Edwards to Bill Clinton? Puh-lease. That's like saying being married to a President is the SAME as being President. Its a total non-sequiter (sp?).

3. Do people really think Bill will be involved in the day-to-day of a Hillary presidency? He has not been involved in the day-to-day of Hillary's senatorial career. She lives in Washington and he lives in New York. He spends significant time on diplomatic and hummanitarian trips. And while they may have a relationship based on intellectual respect, I don't think many consider it a loving or typical husband/wife relationship, ie. they do not discuss their days sharing the same bed each night.

ConcernedDem   January 21st, 2008 11:05 am ET

Hillary Clinton has shown grace ,confidence and strength in this campaign ,she is the new start the country needs.
Obama does not do well under pressure ,his strategy is attack but expect no response and then whine if there is one.Not very presidential at all.
Have we forgotten the debate pile ons ,the stupid remarks linking Bhutto assasination to her Iraq vote,th "likeable enough" comment and the insinuation re Rev.King against Hillary?

Jenny, Paxton, MA   January 21st, 2008 11:05 am ET

CNN, you just ate up my comment? not even pretending to moderate any more, eh? getting sneakier and more desperate every day....

Jeff   January 21st, 2008 11:05 am ET

Sour Grapes by Obama !!!!

Hey did anyone hear that AWFUL Spanish Radio Ad in NV by Obama against Hillary

Talk about Shameful

if Obama loses SC he is in Freefall

He certainly will have his hands full in the Debate tonight

Tim   January 21st, 2008 11:05 am ET

Distantfan...you are totally dead on with your post.

Andrew   January 21st, 2008 11:05 am ET

Get out of the kitchen Obama as it's obvious you can't take the heat. Perhaps you should go to Wisconsin to search for some cheese to go with that whine.

Anitra from NC   January 21st, 2008 11:04 am ET

Every American and especially every African-American should rethink the domino effect caused by Bill Clinton's moral character. The good impact to the African-American people during his term is already overwritten by the impact of electing George Bush. Forgiven? Yes! Is he a credible source who should get so much press during this campaign? Not at all! Please silence President Clinton! He's done more than enough.

Manny, NY   January 21st, 2008 11:02 am ET

2 against 1

Shame on Bill!!!

Matt   January 21st, 2008 11:02 am ET

I think Thomas Jefferson and the rest of the founding fathers are probably rolling over in their graves at this very moment.

I look back at the Clinton presidency through rose-colored glasses like a lot of people because of a lot of the things that have happened since he left office,BUT if you are one of the people who favor Mrs Clinton because in your heart of hearts you want the former President back for a 3rd term...thats just wrong.

Kind of off topic but in retrospect we can thank Bill for destroying what was left of the blue collar middle class on his way out with NAFTA.

hp   January 21st, 2008 11:02 am ET

Hilary 08.
She represents people with income $50,000.00 and less. She represents people with all races. She represents the INVISIBLES.

Shae   January 21st, 2008 11:01 am ET

This country has been divided along political lines for far too long. We now need someone in the White House that can bring unity to our wonderful nation before we end up like the Middle East countries. The mud slinging needs to stop by all of the candidates and political parties. Political change is needed and OBAMA has been carrying that message since the beginning. Do we want togetherness or separatism? Our country has gone through many changes with the most recent being the overhaul of attitudes and behaviors of the late 50's and 60's – Social change – Thank you Dr. King......My vote is for OBAMA because he can bring this nation together for the next change – political and social change.

Cheryl   January 21st, 2008 11:01 am ET

Obama: "I'm up against both Clintons."

WAAAH! WAAAAH! WAAAAHHH!!! You think that's hard, try dealing with foreign leaders when it gets hard, and you don't have your secretary next to you to organize your papers for you. We need a leader who can think on their feet.

Darren   January 21st, 2008 11:01 am ET

I do not think Obama is complaining. He is just merely telling the media and the American people that what the Clitntons are doing is false. If I remember correctly, thus far Obama has been running a fair campaign. Hillary is the one that was mailing letters to homes in New Hampshire about where Obama stood on issues. Incidentally everything she printed turned out to be lies.

I too used to have the utmost respect for Bill Clinton. Not anymore.

Mechelle   January 21st, 2008 11:00 am ET

Enough of the Clintons. Please.

Melissa, Tarpon Springs, Fl   January 21st, 2008 11:00 am ET

Once more we Americans get to see what the Clintons are all about – POWER – at any price. Do you really want four more years of this garbage? Vote for Obama or Edwards and not for the dynasty of divisiveness!

Nick   January 21st, 2008 11:00 am ET

All clintons supporters are the same people who attend jerry springer and hardly have the time to look up facts and almost blasphemous comments made by bill clinton.This guy is just disaster.I am a democrat (and 14 of my collegues)
and if Obama looses which i am at a point of accepting, will almost be certain to vote for Mcain although never voted in the last 20 years.

M. Winners, Mesa, AZ   January 21st, 2008 11:00 am ET

MEMO TO HILL...Dump Bill from campaigning on your behalf. It makes it look like he's in control of you. Not a good thing if you want my vote...

Dan A   January 21st, 2008 10:59 am ET

typical Clintons–fraudulent and dishonest–America wake up–this Sonny@ Cher combo is a giant joke

Ken   January 21st, 2008 10:59 am ET

Obama, grow up and quit your whining.

Gerri   January 21st, 2008 10:59 am ET

It is very obvious that the Clinton's are doing dirty tricks. First, they were upset because Obama was critizing Hillary, and the Clinton's falsely accused Obama of bringing up the race card to "dirty" him up and then went on the attack of Obama.
Bill is the attack dog and Hillary sits back and acts innocent. If this is any indication of what we can expect from a 2nd Clinton administration, then it is the same old washington politics. Hillary could not control Bill the first time around, and I doubt if she will reign him in second time around. The Clinton's did not expect Obama to do as well as he has so therefore, they have to play dirty.

I think it is the Clinton's that think that the american public is stupid. Bill is using underhanded tactics to steal votes from Obama. I am not fooled by Bill's tactics. Obviously Bill promised HIllary he would do what it takes for her to claim the White House.

I was never going to vote for Hillary. My choice would have been Edwards. Since Obama joined the race, I am voting for Obama. I think what the Clinton's have done is deceptive and vicious.

One BIG difference between Hillary and Obama is that Hillary uses "I" an awful lot and Obama talks about "we". I personally do not like southern white women as managers. Every southern, white woman that I have worked for are "catty", "arrogant" and only cares about themselves. Therefore, if Hillary is the Democratic nominee, I will vote Republican or Independent and I am a african american woman.

Atlanta   January 21st, 2008 10:58 am ET

Oh, lets us all watch him whine some more. I'll be pleased after Feb, 5 when the country realizes he has no shot.

mike   January 21st, 2008 10:57 am ET

NO 3 TERM PRESIDENCY, BILLARY. IT'S THE CONSTITUTION, STUPID.

Sad to Say   January 21st, 2008 10:57 am ET

Obama is not the one acting like a kid, it is the negative, foolish, and childish adults supporting Hillary. First of all she is supposed to be the one running for president the one with all the experience right than why is her husband the one causing all the problems. You can't believe anything he says we all know he will lie and is not the most truthful person. She is not going to win there are too many people against her in both parties. I now know what the democrats stand for and I have had enough of it you all are no better than the republicans. You are a bunch of in the closet dirty rude racist and are the ones spreading the Clintons lies with the emails about Obama. Democrats republicans there is no difference weak narrow minded clowns.

ron cherry   January 21st, 2008 10:56 am ET

It 's not whinning, Obama has most often taken the high road. But it's time to take the gloves off.

larry fort wayne. indiana   January 21st, 2008 10:56 am ET

I guess some of you people don't realize that choosing a president of the democratic candidate is NOT a game...

Woz Los Gatos, CA   January 21st, 2008 10:56 am ET

Obama is absolutely right. He is most definitely running against both Clintons, and Bill absolutely believes that voters will want to put *him* back in power with a vote for Hillary.

Why does this surprise anybody?

Back in awaiting moderation hell...   January 21st, 2008 10:55 am ET

Wow CNN.....you are something else..............Nothing negative on Obama is allowed??? Just negative comments on the Clintons!!!...How much did Rezko pay you!!!!

charles   January 21st, 2008 10:55 am ET

It is impossible for Republicans to present a unified Candidate for the November general election. Bush basically eliminated all chances for the Republican party to remain strong. But there is ONE way the Republicans can unite behind their eventual candidate. That solution is Hillary. Hillary will unite the Republican party, split and divide the Democratic Party. Many devout Democrats will stay home in the November election, disheartened by the divisive abrasive tactics by Hillary and Bill.

The turnout in the November general election will be roughly equal between Republican supporters and Democratic supporters - the outcome is a toss up.

Leigh   January 21st, 2008 10:55 am ET

It's always amazing to me to read these comments and how vicious they are against Senator Clinton, especially when some of you engage in hateful names aimed at the Senator and you don't even know her. Neither do I but I do work with people who do know her as well as President Clinton and they also know former President Bush and Mrs. Bush. I'm told Senator Clinton is not only a very intelligent lady but an extremely nice person. People I work with who know her do not understand how and why people like some of you vilify her so.

If any of you watched the Democrats debate from Nevada on MSNBC, you saw Tim Russert, someone I really don't care for as he seems to have difficulty moderating these debates without bias, confront Senator Obama with four pages of false attacks issued by his campaign against Senator Clinton. Senator Obama admitted his campaign was responsible and said that was "regretful." He didn't apologize. Senator Clinton on the other hand, has fired at least two people from her campaign from engaging in what she believed was inappropriate behavior but not Senator Obama.

So, I think some of you in the Obama camp need to back off and take a hard look at your guy. I'm very sad that the Senator has chosen to play the race card as well. When I heard Senator Obama speak at the 2000 Democratic Convention, I thought this was a man I could support for the highest office in our country. No longer. He talks the talk but has no substance behind his talk. He has been divisive by separating us all according to color and that saddens me greatly especially on today of all days. Senator Obama has attacked the Clintons on race when they have spent the majority of their lives working for civil rights for all. So step back folks. Be objective.

Jenny, Paxton, MA   January 21st, 2008 10:55 am ET

what's he gonna say when he will be up against half the country? will he be still talking about UNITING the country across party lines, when he can't even bridge the next to non-existing gap between him and billary? rude awakening, eh?

anthony   January 21st, 2008 10:55 am ET

If America cannot see through these two (Bill and Hillary), i am really sorry for you all. If you think that the Clintons are in this for the American people, you all are sadly mistaken. The clintons are in this for themselves. If Hillary wins the nomination, i will not vote for her. I am just sick and tired of the fighting and the fussing that the clintons are engaged in. THE WORLD IS WATCHING THIS ELECTION AMERICA AND IM SURE THEY MUST BE LAUGHING AT US AT HOW UNCIVILIZED WE ARE AS A NATION. IF WE HAVE NOT LEARN FROM BUSH, WE WILL NEVER LEARN AGAIN. HILLARY IS AN EXTENTION OF BUSH. GOOD LUCK.

Hugh Jass, Atlanta, GA   January 21st, 2008 10:55 am ET

Can anyone describe any bills or other legislative successes/initiatives led or fostered by Clinton or Obama? Have either made any contribution to the betterment of America?
It's difficult to find a basis to support either with no documented history supporting their abilities to organize and direct anything universally beneficial to regular folks.
Explain to me also how folks who pay no taxes get refunds. I would like to have a clear explanation where the money to pay those "mythical" refunds comes from??
Help me out.

Steve   January 21st, 2008 10:54 am ET

OH yeah bring the country together, is that whats going on here? Delusional, right wingers will never, ever come together with the liberals...this country is falling apart slowly but surley....

Laura   January 21st, 2008 10:54 am ET

Obama is taking orders from Al Sharpton. So if he is elected president, Obama will be taking orders from Sharpton and Oprah. Pretty scary I think.

Vote Republican!

Noah   January 21st, 2008 10:53 am ET

When Obama expresses his disappointment in the Clinton's actions, he is considered a whiner who obviously can't stand the heat and is therefor unfit to become President. When Obama ignores Clinton, he is considered unfit because he's afraid to tackle his opponent and therefor probably can't stand the heat. Not gonna work for me. Obama's disappointed in the way the Clintons are playing this thing, and he's voicing that disappointment. Would you rather he keep quiet?

Chaunda   January 21st, 2008 10:53 am ET

liz, fairmont

You are the problem with the democratic party. I won't vote if it is not my guy. I would rather vote republican than that guy. That truly is channeling the voice of a two year old. My way or I will mess it up for everyone.

The fact is that none of the candidates are making stunning and controversial statements or commitments. If you like ones platform and viewpoint you like them all.

And all the "democrats" that are minimizing Bill Clintons accomplishments as president maybe you are too young to remember the 90's. I bacame an adult in the 90's and let me tell you it was a good prosperous time for me as a middle class child trying to gain the dream for myself.

LeftyLadig   January 21st, 2008 10:52 am ET

As a longtime supporter and defender of Bill Clinton, I am appalled at his vicious attacks on Barack Obama. I can hardly wait until Feb 5 when I can cast my vote for Barack Obama, our next President.

jlCA   January 21st, 2008 10:52 am ET

Obama is a motivational speaker. His big stand is he voted No! on the war. But Obama keeps voting to give Bush more money for the war. Every lost to Hillary he starts crying unfair.. Obama's campaign lacks experience and substance, His rally's us HOPE & CHANGE to motivate the crowd.

Go! Bill ! Thank you for letting us know what Obama is all about.
We need someone tuff to go in the oval office to clean up this mess. Hillary can handle herself she's proven that when Obama and Edwards gang up on her in these debates.

Robb   January 21st, 2008 10:52 am ET

And Hillary isn't running agianst Obama and Oprah?

Lauren   January 21st, 2008 10:51 am ET

Without the last name Hillery couldn't win a dog fight.
I wish people would stop saying the Clinton's did so much for black people.
List the so called thimgs they did for black people then look closely at the back room deals they made with these chicken eating black preachers and so called black leaders. Then maybe you will have a different idea of THE CLINTON'S. AND GIVE SOMEONE LIKE OBAMA A LOOK.

Tom Davie   January 21st, 2008 10:50 am ET

All this SPIN SPIN SPIN doesnt solve anything.

Bill Clinton is Hillarys husband.

He has the direct right to campaign for her. Its not illegal or immoral or anything else. Obviously for some reason Obama is squarly intimidated by him now.

If people dont like it , vote for Obama. Problem solved.

Its also Obvious Obama realizes he is fighting Bills presidency as well, and his advisors think its COSTING HIM.

Never mind the complaining that he 'never saw it coming' .

Hillary Clinton can easily lead the nation. Obama whining about Big bad bill challenging his war record is just CHILDISH.

Welcome to the big leagues Senator Obama. The dream of having it ALL GO YOUR WAY is not turning out as planned.

Steve   January 21st, 2008 10:50 am ET

We knew Bill Clinton never demonstrated any ethics when he was in white house but the way he is participating in Hillary's campaign is PATHETIC. We expect ex-Presidents to be statesmen but Bill is a shameless HUMAN being. He is a disgrace to US and to Human Race.

I was planning to Vote for Hillary but now I have changed my mind because with her we will again have Bill……. Sorry Hillary

I WONDER WHAT YOUR SO MAD ABOUT? Bill Clinton did nothing wrong in the 8 years he was in the White House, no matter how much the Christian Coalition Republican Party tried they could not get anything on him except some extra-marital affair that was and stil is none of our business. This country has never had an ex-presidents wife run for the same office how do we know what his participation is? I think you may need som EX-LAX and calm down.

Distantfan   January 21st, 2008 10:49 am ET

What I find horribly shocking is that people are treating the primaries like an American Idol contest. Think about this: if politicians with a long history of advocating for minorities can be called racists, and years of dedicated work is thrown out simply because someone of color wants to win an election, what hope does any community or interest group have in the future? I find this appalling.

All of a sudden the media and Oprah decided who should be the candidate and any political game is suddenly off limits to one candidate because he is black? This is politics, they are supposed to go up against each other so that we can gauge their competence. The hands-off approach to Obama is unbelievable, just as the dismissal of every other Candidate that is not Hillary is. The Clinton hating should stop, and the other "invisible" candidates should have their share of exposure. That does not include simply asking their opinion of the latest Obama/Clinton dispute.

As Americans, we should be ashamed that we are acting like the mobs that play along with American idol.

Gabe Bahr   January 21st, 2008 10:49 am ET

The Clintons are as dirty as it gets. Flip flopping? Right. Its laughable that the Clintons could accuse Obama of "flip flopping". Obama has ALWAYS been against the war. The Clintons? No. Hillary didn't have the wisdom to see through the lies from the beginning. The Clintons know they look like all the rest of the idiots in washington that voted for the war so there doing the oldest trick in the book. Discrediting. The Clintons know they got nothing on Obama so their resorting to this.

This isn't "whining". Its stating the obvious.

For some of you who ask "Why hasn't Obama introduced any plans yet?" He has! THEY'VE BEEN OUT FOR MONTHS NOW! Either your just that dumb or you don't really care.
You can find VERY SPECIFIC plans at http://www.barackobama.com/issues/
While your at it download the blueprint for change so you know what your actually talking about.

Jon, Lantana   January 21st, 2008 10:48 am ET

Distorting truth is what I see Obama doing. Not to mention BO Supporters on here who dont educate themselves on truth and instead keep mentioning untruths. Look up HRC's record on wikipedia for example and you will see an exemplary recrod for her since the 70's. Bill Clinton has told the people about the false hopes that BO has represented and told of his flip-flopping about the war in Iraq. You take a look at the people who voted in the war and you will see that the majority of people who did, dont now because they were misled by our government. Keep on crying BO because this is just the tip of the iceberg. If you were to make it into the finals you will be absolutely obliterated by the republicans, no lie. BC has every right to stump for his wife. And for one last thing. As evidence of this baby syndrom, hard-core Obama supporters whine that they will vote repub if Hillary gets the nod. A) we dont need you as a democrat if you have to resort to this childish behavior and flip-flop we believe in our party no matter who leads it. B) stop resorting to republican scare tactics and whining.

Sandy, KS   January 21st, 2008 10:48 am ET

cry baby, cry ..thats all you know.
Why don't you see Hillary has to run against you and Oprah.

Nora Spencer   January 21st, 2008 10:47 am ET

Barack Obama has never had the experience of running a contentious campaign. His win of the Senate seat for Illinois was a cakewalk. He was handed this seat, and if he thinks the same thing will happen with the presidency he is sadly mistaken.

He's a spoiled child who has always had whatever he wanted handed to him.
Well if he wants the presidency he has to prove he can handle the job, and as far as I can see he can't, his constant whining that "Hillary's picking on me" is getting old quick. The more we see of Obama the less Presidential he looks.

Eric in Massachusetts - still awaiting moderation   January 21st, 2008 10:47 am ET

Baracka Hussein Obama, the great uniter, is on a crash course with destiny… self destruction. February 5th my friends. He and his campaign are already starting to crumble.

What's wrong Baracka? Is Oprah and Usher on your campaign trail not enough for you? I can't fathom that a political candidate is complaining because his opponent's spouse is involved in the campaign. He's crying foul. Unbelievable. Well, at least the American people are beginning to see the real Baracka Hussein Obama. The crybaby. Is Hillary crying to the press that Oprah is stumping for Obama?

The Baracka Hussein Obama campaign is showing their inexperience and lack of class. They never put a stop to the racist ads in Nevada. Obama never congratulates Hillary on her wins. Too bad. This is the guy you want to run the largest super power in the World? I don't think so.

Paul   January 21st, 2008 10:46 am ET

BLOGGER BULL – For all the bloggers slamming Obama – What about Hillary? The crybaby! If she can't handle the pressure of a political race how will she ever be able to handle a war! I can see her reaction now to an incident in the US again, 'aww ...i just feel so deeply, but i dont want to hur anyones feelings...does anyone have a kleenex?'

IM Canadian   January 21st, 2008 10:46 am ET

The saddest thing is that too many people are buying into the two Clintons.

1. Bill was a nothing President who held the wheel during a time when the country was able to operate happily on autopilot. He added no value and therefore, now, speaks with no truly substantive foundation from his past. SO... why are you listening to him?

2. Hillary does not want to do the job of President, she simply wants to be President. Women... eventhough Hillary's little tear event was, in my opinion, honest – that has to be one of the greatest dis-services to the female gender – to flip your intelligent vote for Obama over to one of your sisters who was not afraid to cry. If that's all it takes then the voters are more responsible for a broken Washington than any dozen evil old politcal hacks combined. And... you seem to indicate a willingness to maintain things as-is. Oh... and Dems... if you send Hillary out there against the Reps you're gonna lose it and then you will get a 3rd term of "Bushness" – GET A GRIP!

There will always be Clintons in every election, to waste your votes on. An Obama type of candidate will only come along once in a long while. So, choose... do you really want the same thing again?

Robin   January 21st, 2008 10:46 am ET

Should Bill Clinton take part in the Democratic Debates?
Sorry Bill and Hill, you lost my vote.

John Luma   January 21st, 2008 10:45 am ET

I agree with Barack, the Clinton soap opera has begun again. Who are we voting for President and who is running here? I cannot imagine a White House and the Presidency where two people are heading the nation - one official and one appointed by her to do the dirty work. It's not the kind of setup that will lead to success with Bill becoming defacto V.P. and every cabinet member any time he wants to be.

I would simply put it this way, which seems clear now: Hillary has indeed found her voice, and his name is Bill.

Bad judgement, and the hallmark of Hillary and Bill. Two egos who feel they are entitled to this office.

Dee   January 21st, 2008 10:44 am ET

If you can't stand the heat then get out of the kitchen! Hillary Clinton has been double-teamed by Edwards and Obama on and off debates. The media constantly smears her. What do you expect a husband to do? Let us be real and honest. If I were Bill Clinton I would defend my wife and set the record straight just like what he is doing. If the media or the other contenders won't, then I will ! Go Bill ! Obama, this shows that you are not ready to go up against the Republicans in November and you are not ready to lead the most powerful country in the word.

Hillary Clinton for President! She has my support!

leslie   January 21st, 2008 10:44 am ET

If you want to vote for Hillary, I say more power to you. But don't fool yourself into thinking that you're only voting for one person for president–Bill is not going to sit on the sidelines and pour tea.

As far as Sen. Obama "whining" and "not being fit for office"–sounds like things that people were saying about Hillary; are her supporters trying to flip the terminology? Those comments had no objective credence for Hillary and none for Barack.

I really wish people would lay off the spin.

NCLaw441   January 21st, 2008 10:44 am ET

I haven't seen Obama shed a tear, yet many here are calling him a cry baby. Wasn't it Hillary who cried about how hard it is on the campaign trail?

I am conservative and will vote for neither Hillary or Obama, but because of poltical philosophy, not because somebody "whined" or "cried."

Neither Obama or Hillary have any level of executive experience and no military experience. Neither has run a business, a city or a state. Except for a term and a half in the Senate, all of Hillary's experience is derivative of her husband's. Obama has even less experience. If experience is what the democrats want, they should be supporting Biden or Richardson; or heaven forbid, McCain, Giuliani, Thompson or Romney, each of whom has vastly more experience than Hillary and Obama combined.

Mary   January 21st, 2008 10:44 am ET

Is saddens me to see that the Clinton's style of campaigning is acceptable to the American people. I find it insulting that they can say anything they want and think we are all stupid enough to believe it. What shameful behavior from a fromer US President. Is this what we can expect from Hillary Clinton if she is elected. Say anything to defame your enemies. Slant what you say whether it is truthful of not to make your case? I think Americans deserve much better.

Mike   January 21st, 2008 10:43 am ET

What we're seeing from the Clintons is no longer a campaign, but a quest for power. Americans should take heed. Our founding fathers revolted against this kind of nepotism.

Dave M   January 21st, 2008 10:43 am ET

The Clintons make me so sick. And the people who support them are frankly stupid individuals who probably shouldn't vote in the first place.

How many times do you have to see what digusting people Bill and Hillary are?

Do you even realize that if they win, we won't even know who the real president is?

All that's going to happen in a "Billary" administration is this:

Your taxes are going to go up big time, and don't give me that middle class tax relief crapola, they're going up. You are a fool if you think this will not happen and why people vote for people who they know are going to raise their taxes just baffles me.

Healthcare is going to get socialized in this country. Like a 2 day wait to go see a doctor??? You like that idea?? that's what you're supporting

Terrorists will strike this new administration on US soil, to test their resolve, and there response will be weak and ineffective.

PEOPLE! IN THE NAME OF WHAT IS RIGHT AND DESCENT IN THIS COUNTRY, REJECT THE CLINTONS, THEY ARE DUPING YOU JUST LIKE THEY DID IN 1992!

Anonymous   January 21st, 2008 10:43 am ET

Obama does whine.

And he has turned this into a black/white race.

He needs to go away and grow up.

Ian, Chattanooga   January 21st, 2008 10:42 am ET

This is not a test for Obama. It's not a question of Obama being able to handle the tough politics of the Clinton's or the Republican's. It's really a test for the American people. Are we really tired of old style dirty politics, and are we really ready for a change. Obama believes in the American people. I hope he's right.

James, Houston,TX.   January 21st, 2008 10:42 am ET

David Axelrod, "What Happens in Vegas stays in Vegas", stay there; You Sir have become a liability.
Barak Obama, "If its to HOT in the Oven, Get out of the Kitchen"; As a student of Recent History, You should remember that Quotation. Look It UP! (HST)
Hillary via Bill should trace by to greatness!

Bryan   January 21st, 2008 10:42 am ET

As a former president, the kind of politics Bill Clinton is engaging in smacks of impropriety. He was a good president, but being the attack dog of Hillary Clinton's campaign is unbecoming of 1) a candidate's spouse and 2) a former president of the United States. Endorsements are one thing, but ofmenting rumors and attacks is certainly outside of the duties of a former president.

This sort of behavior is just turning me off to Hillary Clinton all the more. I have been an Obama supporter from the start, but increasingly I am hoping that if Hillary wins the nomination, McCain comes to the fore for the Republicans. I would probably pick him over Hillary Clinton any day.

Pete   January 21st, 2008 10:42 am ET

Fact Check:

Accusation of flip-flopping:

The quote Clinton used to say that Obama wasn't decided early on–"What I would have done? I don't know."–omits the remainder of the statement, which reads: "What I know is that from my vantage point the case not made [for the War]." They were talking about early intelligence reports. Obama stood out strongly against the war. Result: Clinton willfully distorts the truth. Here's proof of prescient foresight against the war.

Obama's later votes to fund the war:

Every single Democrat has voted to fund the war.

Dylan the California Liberal   January 21st, 2008 10:42 am ET

Not to mention Hillary seems to be making a lot of you Democrats sound like Republicans... "flip flopper." Scary...

Scott, Madison, WI   January 21st, 2008 10:41 am ET

The whining and lying has been by Bill (big surprise!) for Hillary the strong woman candidate who is not remotely qualified for the position she's running for without the resume of her husband which isn't too impressive either. Other than Chelsea, the Clintons haven't birthed anything but slime and sleaze their whole lives.

Lets start at the beginning. Hillary headed the Young Republicans at Wellesley College and was a self described Goldwater girl.
Hillary Clinton served on Wal-Mart's board of directors for six years. She was paid $1,500 for each meeting she attended and accumulated at least $100,000 in Wal-Mart stock.
She was a senior Partner at the Rose Law Firm and all her associates went to prison.
Hillary Clinton takes credit for the last Clinton Administration when touting her experience advantage over Senator Obama and Edwards.
Lets list the important ones:
N.A.F.T.A. and the W.T.O. – Clinton passed these disastrous trade deals that have destroyed our middle class and sent our good paying blue-collar jobs away.
H1B Visa. – Clinton permitted U.S. corporations to import 300,000 high skilled foreign workers per year to replace Americans, to the benefit of a few superrich contributors. That’s 10 times the number even Bush allowed in.
Ballistic Missile Technology to China. – Clinton reversed a State Department ban to allow just one company to do it. A company headed by the largest contributor to Bill Clintons reelection campaign, Bernard Schwartz.
The Clintons directly led to the Republican takeovers of the Presidency and both Houses of Congress with their shenanigans.
The Clinton's take credit for the Internet boom that started in 1995 and went bust in 2000. That boom increased income tax money paid to the Government. We had a short-term balanced budget. That was a fluke the Clintons had nothing to do with.
And now Hillary has Terry McAuliffe running her campaign. Court documents show this sleazy guy walked away with millions of I.B.E.W. Union pension money. McAuliffe also ended up with several million dollars from the Global Crossing fiasco that left thousands of honest peoples life savings gone.
You don’t believe me? Please don't take my word for it. Google it.

Blacks Learning 'Goldwater Girl' Hillary Was AGAINST
the Civil Rights Act of 1964….Feel Deceived !
A March 12, 2007 article written by acclaimed Washington columnist Robert Novak sheds a very revealing light on the true sentiment of Hillary Clinton during the peak of the Civil Rights Movement. Clinton recently was found to have minimized the great and monumental strides taken by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. by stating that it was Lyndon B. Johnson, then president, who should receive the credit for civil rights progress including the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
In an attempt to attract black support Hillary Clinton regularly shares her 'civil rights experience' during every speech given to blacks audiences. Novak writes of one such speech at Selma's First Baptist Church on the 42nd anniversary of the "bloody Sunday" freedom march there, where Sen. Clinton declared: "As a young woman, I had the great privilege of hearing Dr. King speak in Chicago. The year was 1963. My youth minister from our church took a few of us down on a cold January night to hear [King]. . . . And he called on us, he challenged us that evening to stay awake during the great revolution that the civil rights pioneers were waging on behalf of a more perfect union." But Novak's article states that there's a big problem with her statement.
The fact is, in 1963, the same period of time she speeks of at all black church appearances, not only was Hillary Clinton a republican, but she was also a staunch supporter of republican Senator Barry Goldwater, well known as a segregationist and one of the most vocal senators adamently against the passing of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which is why he lost in his presidential bid to Lyndon B. Johnson. Novak writes "…how then could she be a 'Goldwater Girl' in the next year's presidential election?" He continues, "…she described herself in her memoirs as 'an active Young Republican' and 'a Goldwater girl, right down to my cowgirl outfit.' (Hillary worked on Golwater's presidential campaign)
Novak adds, "As a politically attuned honor student, she must have known that Goldwater was one of only six Republican senators who joined Southern Democratic segregationists opposing the historic voting rights act of 1964 inspired by King. Hillary headed the Young Republicans at Wellesley College.
The incompatibility of those two positions of 40 years ago was noted to me (Novak) by Democratic old-timers who were shocked by Sen. Clinton's temerity in pursuing her presidential candidacy." Novak adds, "What Hillary Clinton said at Selma is significant because it betrays her campaign's panicky reaction to the unexpected rise of Sen. Obama as a serious competitor for the Democratic nomination.
Clinton's plans were transformed by the advent of Obama, an African-American threatening the hard allegiance of black voters forged by Bill Clinton. On one hand, the Clinton campaign has attacked Obama and his supporters. On the other hand, she has sought to solidify her civil rights credentials.
While Clinton was re-inventing her past, her road to the White House is not going as planned. Instead of a steady procession to coronation at the Denver convention, she is involved in a real struggle against credible opponents led by Obama. No wonder she and her handlers were tempted to imply the existence long ago of a young lady in Chicago's suburbs who never really existed."
Blacks are stating their feeling of betrayment now that these truths are being exposed as they come to the conclusion that the fact is, Hillary was AGAINST the passing of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that Dr. King died for and as a 'Goldwater Girl' she was even against Lyndon B. Johnson, the very person she now gives the credit to for Dr. King getting to the mountaintop. !

In the 8 yrs. as a State Senator Mr. Obama introduced 233 healthcare reform bills, 125 poverty and public assistance, 112 crime fighting, 97 economic, 62 education, 60 human rights, 21 ethics, 20 environmental, 15 gun control, 6 veterans affairs, and many others. Many of which were bi-partisan supported and written into law, including the strongest ethics bill ever written into law of any state. In his first year as U.S. Senator he authored 152 and co-sponsored 427. These incluced the bi-partisan Coburn-Obama Transparency Act of 2006 with Republican Tom Coburn, with Republican Richard Lugar came the Lugar-Obama Nuclear non-proliferation and Conventional Weapons Threat Reduction Act, the 2006 Congressional Ethics bill, all signed into law. There are presently 890 bills in Senator Obama's name and another 1096 co-sponsored, many of which are bi-partisan. Pending legislation include a sweeping campaign finance reform bill and one all Americans should make themselves aware of and support Senate bill S-1181 The Protection Against Executive Compensation Act.

W. T. Moses, Boca Raton, Florida   January 21st, 2008 10:41 am ET

I feel that Clintons & Obama are like kids in a play pen and Bill Clinton is right in there with them.. What is Hillary Clintons true life style? There has been little said by the democrats on abortion or gay marriages???? WHY??? Naturally, because they are both pro abortion and pro gay marriages. We do not need them running our country. Here is to the future PRESIDENT ROMNEY we all pray. God bless America and UNDER GOD forever.

Bev   January 21st, 2008 10:41 am ET

The Hillary is staying nice while Bill does her dirty work for her. Wuith all the attention on Bill as if he were the candidate running for the nomination and not Hillary, It makes me wonder who would be the power in the White House if Hillary is elected. Would Hillary be just a figure head being nice to everyone while Bill made all the decissions behind the scenes and had all the power. It also looks like Bill is talking for Hillary and that he can't take a back seat to his wife in the race for the nomination to the Presidential race. Bill wants to be President. It is like it is his race not Hillary's.

Ann, MO   January 21st, 2008 10:41 am ET

If the women of this country want to see a woman elected to the Presidency, why are they feeling that the woman to do it is one that refuses to take on Obama herself, instead of having to have her husband do it?

Al, FL   January 21st, 2008 10:40 am ET

I hope all of you Hillary supporters realize that it's a dangerous game we are playing letting this dynasty continue. Bill & Hillary should not return to the White House...this will be viewed negatively by the global community, make no mistake about it. Obama is the only hope we have of saving face for our country. Also, if you believe in polls...Obama has a better chance of winning against the GOP's in the general election....Hillary being the nominee, means we are taking a change...can you imagine president Huckabee???...
God forbid we all come together for a change (no pun intended)...DIVIDED WE FAIL!!!

Bo   January 21st, 2008 10:40 am ET

Obama is not crying, he's just speaking out about wrong and divisive politics.

Scott the Keeper (atl06)   January 21st, 2008 10:40 am ET

Whining???LOL... I didn't see any tears... I guess on female presidential candidates can do that...huh.

You know, I like Hillary, but I do believe that most of her supporters are over 45, and angry. They don't really want the country to do better. They just want to get back at G.W.B. (I'm no G.W.B. fan either) But that type of thinking just keeps us on the crazy cycle, going round and round. Then in four years, the Republicans will come out in force the change the course of the country again because the Clinton's will have officially galvinized them again... And here we go...

Fact is, no one doing independent research, or thinking logically for themselves can find issues with any statement (Including the Ronald Regan Comment (and I'm definitely not a fan of ole Ronny...lol)), or plan that Barack Obama has made. They just can't. Now when Hillary has a good point, I give credit where credit is do... Why can't Hillary supporters do the same for Obama?

Instead, you blindly follow what she say's is true, when in actuality, she hasn't really had a good "truth" track-record...

I know... I know... Some Clintons supporters are going to read this and know it's true, but still say, "I don't care... I'm still vote'n for her cause I like the way things used to be in the 90's"

2008 is nothing like the 90's... Clinton supporters are also probably still trying to squeeze into those jeans from the 90's too...lol Let it go... Just let it go...

Ken   January 21st, 2008 10:40 am ET

The Clintons are a JOKE. Bill was impeached (for Lying and his Behavior), and now we're supose to Believe anything he says? Please. Hillary thinks shes paid her dues and now is disappointed because she was not just given the nomination. So what does she do? Send the liar out to spread more of his garbage. Senator Obama has INTEGRITY and HONESTY on his side. I can't imagine the American people wanting anymore of the CLINTON BOLOGNA !
Senator Obama has the right ideas for AMERICA. We sure don't need anymore of these lifetime politicians, LOOK WHAT THEY HAVE DONE FOR AMERICA !

J Mooney   January 21st, 2008 10:39 am ET

I guess we should keep up the double standard and allow Michelle Obama distort everyone elses record but Bill Clinton should sit by as they destroy his as well. I am sorry but Obama decided to run against Hillary Clinton and her spouse should be able to speak just like Obama's spouse. As an independent voter if Hillary does not win the nomination I will be voting for McCain. It comes down to one thing: Experience.

Lee Ann   January 21st, 2008 10:38 am ET

I have to admit, I feel as if Sen. Obama is running against BOTH Clintons. Frankly, I think we all need to be honest with ourselves, if it weren't for Bill Clinton would Sen. Clinton have the backing and press that she does? Would she truly be electable? When you look at her record has she really accomplished all that much on her own? Discounting her experience as the wife of a governor and President, how much experience does she have? Would she truly be her own person or would her husband be giving her "feedback"? I would love to vote for a woman for president but I keep having this nagging thought that Bill Clinton would be the President as much as Sen. Clinton and that bothers me.

Steve   January 21st, 2008 10:38 am ET

WHAAAA! WHAAAA! WHAAAA! Stop your friggin whining Obama he's a powerhouse and she would be stupid not to use him, me thinks your a little upset that you don't have one like him.

Aimee   January 21st, 2008 10:38 am ET

Does Obama think that Bush Sr. wasn't out there pushing his son? Get over yourself Obama... of course Hillary is going to have Bill campaign for her.

Brian   January 21st, 2008 10:38 am ET

Aren't Democrats "rolling the dice" by nominating a candidate who polarizes the electorate?

If it's Obama-McCain in November - I'm voting Obama

If it's Clinton-McCain - I'm voting McCain

So, Hillary supporters. I totally respect your opinion and I think Hillary would be a competent President. In fact, she's my third choice of the three candidates above.

But if Hillary's the nominee, it's going to be 4 more years of the same old divisive politics, another 50-50 election, and the Republicans very likely will retain control of the White House.

A Bush or Clinton has occupied the White House since 1980. Isn't time for someone – anyone – else?

Akobide   January 21st, 2008 10:37 am ET

Mrs Clinton is bitting the fingers that will feed her in November,2008. I am sorry this is happening at such a time where every Tom,Dick and Harry should be on board.

ronnie   January 21st, 2008 10:36 am ET

I think Obama should stop complaining. What position does he think he's running for? Of course he should expect attacks from everyone, even former presidents. If Obama had a relative who was a former president, wouldn't they be campaigning for him and against Hillary?? I think by him complaining does not look good for his campaign much less his character. What ar you gonna do if you become president...??...complain that he feels hes going up against too many world leaders. If he feels like this attack from the Clintons is a struggle then I do not feel comfortable with him running our country.

Katherine   January 21st, 2008 10:36 am ET

Obama and Hillary need to stop fighting and stick to the issues. This country has been torn apart from having Dubya for 8 years. Bill Clinton left his presidency with a legacy greater than anything that happened in the Oval office, he is highly respected around the world. Hillary is a highly intelligent, caring human being who has worked to make changes for 35 years, maybe you don't like her style, but to accuse her of wrong doing is a wrong. Let us not forget Kenneth Starr and all of the money that was spent trying to find dirt on the Clintons. Obama has a bright future whether he is our next president or not. Let us not drag each other thru the mud and save her barbs for the GOP. "Can't we all just get along?"

shaunM   January 21st, 2008 10:36 am ET

Sorry...but:

"BOO HOO". Suck it up , Obama. The campaign trail is rough as is life.

Susan Texas   January 21st, 2008 10:35 am ET

Oh Obama,

You keep making yourself look smaller by the moment. All was fine when you thought you were winning. Now that you see the American people want someone with a little more experience, and a whole lot more substance, we are suppose to feel sorry for you. I will never vote for Obama because he is green, belongs to a racist church, and just isn't qualified. I could have supported him for VP, or president in a few years, but now I never will. His childish compalints against Hillary Clinton, are serving to divide the party. Obama, think about what is best for the country, and not yourself, stop the complaints, and drop out after super Tuesday. You are going to lose.

Dylan the California Liberal   January 21st, 2008 10:35 am ET

The Clinton campaign has no right to slam Obama on his record on the war. Hillary has voted in favor of the war every chance she's gotten. That why I will not support her in the upcoming California Democratic Primary. She is also the top recipeient of campaign donations from the pharmaceudical companies. That's enough to make me sick. As someone who has the utmost respect for Bill and Hillary, I'm not pleased with their Republican-esque smear tactics in this campagin. I'm very excited to cast my vote for Obama on February 5th.

PMK   January 21st, 2008 10:35 am ET

Carolyn, you are the completely clueless brand Hillary is brainwashing. I feel sorry for you and your obvious lack of a brain.

Jason, Columbia, SC   January 21st, 2008 10:34 am ET

Comparing Michelle's campaigning for Barack to Bill's campaigning for HIllary is altogether unfair. Being a former president, Bill's words are louder and stronger than Michelle's could ever be. Michelle may speak to a crowd of hundreds, but when Bill speaks it is in front of the entire nation.

At best, featuring him so prominently in the campaign tells me that Hillary does not believe she can win on her own merits, so she's running on the nostalgia of his presidency. At worst, it's a harbinger of his unofficial third and fourth terms in office, which I thought we had all agreed sixty years ago would not happen again. Either way, it does little to make me want to vote for Hillary.

If Obama wins the nomination, the Clintons will have made the Republican smear campaign against him that much easier by doing a lot of the homework for them. No matter which one of them wins, this November's elections may well go to the Republicans and much of that fault would lie with Hillary and her quest for power at any cost.

David, Atlanta   January 21st, 2008 10:34 am ET

duh! The only issue I see is this is somwhat a first in modern polotics. Former Presidents usually are not involved at this stage. Both parties do most of the tearing down of their Presidential candidates. They just make it easier for the other side once it becomes a one-on-one fight. The more cordial Clinton is the better shot Dems have. This should be what most Dem leaders are conserned about.

DeVone   January 21st, 2008 10:34 am ET

my friend you are, we need to know Hillary is running for bill and for the undesided
thingk hard and long. I can understand the man helping his wife but ,But.
America lets us go forward this is not a game we have lost lives,we for
thoses of us who donot know America is runed on other Countries money
our children have gone crazy this U S of A has lost all respect home and abroad.
this is not about the first this or that, This JOB IS ABOUT AMERICA.
GOD BLESS AMERICA FOR REAL

Laura Selleck   January 21st, 2008 10:34 am ET

Senator Clinton should run on her own record (we hear very little of her Senate achievements). No matter how often she was consulted during the Clinton Presidency, it is not the same as holding an official appointment or elected office. It makes her look weaker and less competent to have Bill responding on her behalf . Candidates should speak for themselves; spouses can give supportive speeches, but should not be intervening in debates between candidates.

Democrats should read Drew Westen's book on the psychology of voters' decisions. Regretably, voters respond emotionally, rather than intellectually. If experience and in-deph knowledge of issues were really the most important qualifications, Chris Dodd and Joe Biden would be leading the field.

Lynn   January 21st, 2008 10:34 am ET

I am a democrate who fully support Sen. Obama. Who in their right mind would want the Clintons back in the White House. The Republicans would love for Billary to be our nominee. They will be waiting in line 10 deep to defeat them. With the Clintons back in power, we will have AGAIN one scandal after another. Hillary's is only riding Bills coattails. Why any woman would support her is way beyond me. People, it's time to get off the Clinton Plantation!

Katherine   January 21st, 2008 10:33 am ET

He is not whining. Any president better respond to accusations, particularyl ones that are false. Sitting back and not defending your record would be the weak thing to do. HIllary and Bill have accused Obama's campaing of attack tactics too, was that whining? Ghis is a political race, it's not whining to enter the fight.

Anonymous   January 21st, 2008 10:33 am ET

I can't believe you Clinton fans are supporting this?

I only wish Obama would make this campaign as dirty as the Clintons are making theirs. And to you blindly not seeing it makes me nervous.

Obama needs to make this campaign tougher... it's time to not worry about 'her feelings', it's time to talk about her FAKE 35 years of experience.

Obama has been an elected official longer.

If my wife was a nurse. And we live in the same house. That DOES NOT MAKE ME A NURSE.

Bill has gone off the deepend complaing and whining. He is a lie and cheat. She stuck with him because without that Clinton name she is NOTHING. Its time someone says... Its funny that your husband seems to be yelling at the neighbors when you're angry!

Its time someone called her out on her STEADY Flip Flops.

She can't release her records until March.

I was impartial when this election started but after seeing this... And after seeing people support this. It truly makes me sick.

Mary   January 21st, 2008 10:33 am ET

Whine, whine, whine. Obama's popularity skyrocketted after Oprah. Talk about a supporter. Give me a break. You don't have to be in Iraq to bring out the big guns. Buck up buddy because running a country isnt the same as running a campagn.

numa   January 21st, 2008 10:33 am ET

Bush, Clinton, Bush, Clinton, first it was Bush's father then Bill, then Bush's son now the possibility of Bill's wife, doesn't sound too healthy for a democracy. Anyway on the Clinton side who's going to be the real president Bill or Hillary? Bill has been getting too much free coverage and it appears not to be fair to any of the candidates. Bill needs to fade into the background and let Hillary stand on her own.
We need someone different in the office someone that can inspire and unite, not a divisive and polarizing person. I think it's time for OBAMA!

Cherian Jacob   January 21st, 2008 10:31 am ET

I was supporting to Hillary since we need a change, but seeing the dirty politics, and her "I" factor, i thing she is going to do nothing for americans. She was the first lady for 8 years, what she did all these times? yes she is getting popular just because of Bill Clinton, not her credit.

Selecting Hillary will be a big mistake for America and for Democrats.

Khwaty   January 21st, 2008 10:31 am ET

I think Obama is protesting too much. If you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen.

Obama has done a lot of damage to the democratic party and amongst the race. I like Obama, I thought he would be different, I thought he was cream of the crop; I was wrong. What made me change my mind; when he twisted the words of Hillary Clinton when she addressed the issue of LBJ and MLK. Obama, his campaign people and supporters LIED about it.

As a minority, I feel Obama have injured me severely with his rhetoric, making a wedge between minorities and caucasians. I have been treated with a lot of respect by caucasians better than other minority groups especially the blacks.

Edwards has my vote, but if Hillary is the nominee for the party, I'll vote for her.

Ron   January 21st, 2008 10:30 am ET

The Clinton campaign represents the old scratch my back I'll scratch yours and the anything to get elected mentallity. I had voted for Edwards. When he did not have enough votes to be viable, the Clinton people said that they would support me as a delegate to the county convention if I would vote for Hillary. I find this unethical and just plain wrong. It just like buying votes. At least the Obama people stated do want you think is right. With Clinton we get the same old divisive politics. I don't see much difference between they way they act and the way Rove and his cronies acted. They just want power and will do anything to get it.

Therese Shaw, Albuq, NM   January 21st, 2008 10:30 am ET

Too bad Hilliary can't win on her own merit; she has to ride on her husband's coat tails. If she wins its not due to her accomplishments–it will be because of Bill's. As a woman, I want a woman president who stands on her own two feet. not one who beats her chest about being the first woman president and takes credit for the accomplishments of her husband. The two for one ticket may NOT be the answer. As a caveat– If you don't think she's playing gender game's, why is she the only canidate using her first name instead of surname in the political arena ????

Chris   January 21st, 2008 10:30 am ET

Somebody should stop Bill as a liar.

tracey   January 21st, 2008 10:30 am ET

IT'S EASY FOR OBAMA TO ACT ALL SUPERIOR ABOUT NOT VOTING FOR THE WAR -WHEN HE DIDN'T EVEN HAVE A VOTE...

GEE YOUR SO SUPERIOR OBAMA – LIAR

goodwilldrums   January 21st, 2008 10:30 am ET

"I did not have sexual relations with that woman..."

8 months later:

"Indeed I did have relations that were not appropriate..."

Beth   January 21st, 2008 10:29 am ET

Michele Obama does the same thing but she doesnt get the same amount of press as the former president. I agree if he cant handle this know wait til the republicans get a hold of him I have a feeling if hes the nominee and the republicans attack him this will be a race war, not good for our country right now we have enough problems...

Ken   January 21st, 2008 10:29 am ET

The Clintons are liars, Bill was impeached for lying, Hillary is desperate, sending her Husband out to do her dirty work. (Not stong enough to handle it herself) Senator Obama has the right Ideas for this country. We have had it with Liars and cheats in the White House. We need Integrity and Honesty from our Leadership. Not more of the past. The Clinton Years are History. ( and an embarassment to the country.)Time for a NEW AMERICA !!!

joe   January 21st, 2008 10:29 am ET

CNN IS THE ONLY NETWORK BIAS WITH OBAMA....
READ BETWEEN THE LINES...
NOT FAIR TO OTHER CANDIDATES ON HOW CNN SELECTS THEIR HEADLINES AND HOW THEY WRITE THEIR ARTICLES..

CNN BIAS TOWARDS OBAMA...VERY ONE SIDED

Roxanne NY   January 21st, 2008 10:29 am ET

What a cry baby! And he wants to sit in the Oval office?

Annie   January 21st, 2008 10:28 am ET

Tom Davie-My response to your questions is this-How is Hillary going to handle all of these problems? I thought that this election is between Hillary and Obama, but you seem to be implying that Bill is going to be there to deal with the problems of the Presidency and Hillary will be hiding behind him.

Dem 123   January 21st, 2008 10:28 am ET

Obama has a two faced campaign himself.His campaign has done plenty of mudslinging,pile on and misrepresentation about Hillary.They are very quick to attack Clintons themselves ,so I do not understand this whining and wonder why it gets worst with every loss!They even tried to spin a convincing loss in Nevada by predicting one more delegate something that does not even get sdecided till April!
It is time Obama engaged in policy discussion ,time for preaching from the pulpit is long gone!!!

Charles   January 21st, 2008 10:28 am ET

I am still undecided, but I and my friends think Bill Clinton should actually go back home and rest. He his not the candidate, yet you see him every where. And the worst part his that, he his not talking about how our economy will develop, but instead pointing out the stones in people's eye. The respect I have for him is running out, and he his pushing me closer to the other candidates. It's just hard to know who is really running for president Bill or Hillary. A word for Bill Clinton: Your time in white house was a little fun and we are glad for that, but you must also understand that your repetition will be tarnished if you would say anything just to get your wife elected.
Bill Pls Go Home.

Your Daddy   January 21st, 2008 10:28 am ET

d.a: show a little respect, it's SENATOR Obama... he's earned it. I've never seen an ex-President more undignified, but I guess we should have seen it coming when things got tough for Sen. Clinton. As for who the GOP wants to run against - they are arrogant enough to think they can beat their Sens. Clinton or Obama. Don't believe me? Just keep watching good old Karl von Rove's comments in the press, which is really carefully crafted propaganda aimed at dividing and weakening the entire field of Democratic candidates - the GOP would like to capture those undecideds/independants and weaken the Democrats overall mandate of one candidate.

toni: Sen. Clinton whines more than the entire field of candidates put together. Remember the vast 'conservative conspiracy?' That's the Clinton mindset... it's never the will of the people, it's always some paranoid fantasy about the 'machine' up against her. Look for much, much more of that whining if, God forbid, she ever gets near the White House. Sen Obama isn't whining, he's just pointing out the obvious... so get over it.

If Sen Clinton is elected, expect the country to become more polarized and divided than ever. Nothing will get done, we'll never get past partisan politics in the name of getting something truly noteworthy accomplished. Do you really think a boomer can break through this crippling mindset to accomplish something truly revolutionary like universal health care? Baby Boomer politics and Presidents have ruined this country and set us back a generation. (Remember Pres Bush's patheltic 'I am a uniter, not a divider' speech?) Unfortunately, boomer politics never got past the Vietnam War, the major life event during which most politicians shaped their beliefs. The boomer belief system defines the world in 'hawk and dove' terms - Sen McCain the hawk, and Sen Clinton the dove (McCain was in the military fighting the war, and Sen Clinton was smoking dope and staging sit ins at the university). Hopefully, they'll take their politics to the retirement home and that will be the last we see of them.

mark   January 21st, 2008 10:28 am ET

who will sit in the oval office on rough days,if hillery wins? will bill take on the tough jobs while hillary take on the easy ? will this be a shared presidency? or will we the people get whom we vote for?

AJ, IL   January 21st, 2008 10:27 am ET

That's part of the problem in the Democratic nomination process this year. It's not Obama vs Hillary. It's Obama vs Bill Clinton one day, then Obama vs Hillary Clinton the next day.

There is nothing wrong with candidates' spouses supporting them. They should give personal attestment to the character of the candidates and talk about how their spouse would implement change in the White House.

When a recent popular former Democratic President speaks and makes allegations, many ordinary American citizens will usually take his rhetoric as fact. After all he was a president. Why would he lie? But Bill Clinton has publicly shown a tendency to lie or distort the truth both in the past and present.

Bill Clinton overshadows Hillary. This part of problem with a Hillary Clinton candidacy and Presidency. Who will be in charge? Will be Hillary or Bill or clash between both of them? If she can't control Bill on campaign trail, there is no way in hell she can control Bill in the White House.

Was former President GH Bush Sr. on the campaign trail with his son GW Bush Jr. saying all kind of lies and half-truths about McCain in 2000? No!

Obama may feel like he is running against both Clintons, but I know he is running against both Hillary and Bill Clinton.

OBAMA in '08!

Vince, Carson City, Nevada   January 21st, 2008 10:27 am ET

Senator Obama is talking aobout "Change you can believe in" and "unity", Well Senator Obama I have see what your change is all about now. you have gone from a candidate of hope to just another mudslinging candidate which you say you hate. I attended the cacuses in Carson City and there was no intimidation going on. No that happened at my place of employment where two of your campaign staffers were attacking me because I was voting for Clinton. They were then asked to leave by the store manager as they were bothering our other guests. When people on your behaf in Iowa were running negative ads against John Edwards not a peep out of you. When your supporters were running the negative ads against Hilliary on the Spanish radio again not a word from you. For the record Senator Obama, Clinton's campaign did not file the lawsuit and for you to contiune to say so is just wrong. You also do not help your self by painting President Reagan as a Saint and President Clinton as nothing more than just a President. If you want to run as a Republican I sure there is still time for you to do so. When Axlerod from your camapign suggested that Senator Cinton was responsible for the assination of Bhutto in Pakistan again you were silent. Only answering NO when asked if you thought that was correct. I think you owe her and her supporters an apology for that outrageous remark from one of your campaingn staffers. Senator Clinton has apologized to you for comments of her supporters so stand up and be a man and do the right thing. Finally, in closing if you continue these pity attacks on your fellow Democrats, be prepared to lose my vote and many others as we could stay home in November. If this is the change you will bring to Washington, I have already experienced it for the last 8 years and NO THANK YOU!!!!

Dr_MB   January 21st, 2008 10:26 am ET

Dear Bill and Hillary,

Please try to be a little nicer to Barack Obama; he's a little overwhelmed. His experience as being 'present' in the Illinois state senate hasn't really prepared him for such high pressure situations as running for the presidency of the United States.

Alex   January 21st, 2008 10:25 am ET

Obama's whining at such a little thing can only prove he is neither ready nor mature for the big political stage. You should expect attacks from your competition. Whing is not the best way to respond. When you become a president, are you going to whine when you get pressure from the congress, are you going to while when other countries play games on you?

Jose Card - Independent   January 21st, 2008 10:25 am ET

Michelle Obama is no Bill Clinton, who snubs at the Oval Office then and now, but he is desperate to return.

And Michelle is no Barack.
Michelle likes to talk about race, while Barack doesn't like to talk about race.
That's understandable, because they grew up with different backgrounds.
At least, Michelle is not reckless.

MLK is the man we remember for civil rights movements around the world.
Even if LBJ would not sign the bill, the next president would have.
Without MLK, it would have taken at least another decade to pass the civil rights bill.

Thanks to Hillary for her reminder of presidential power she is seeking!

The Clintons will take credits for whatever others do and blame her mistakes on others.
Bill said it was the Republicans' fault that her health reform failed, while she had her husband as the president and a Dem Congress.

alain   January 21st, 2008 10:25 am ET

Is there a jornalist in any of these news outlet with a level of math equivalent to that of a fifth grader? Can anybody tell me why these news outlets continue to proclaim Hillary the winner in Nevada while delegates count in that state shows that Obama has 13 delegates against 12 for Hillary? Is this a looming sign of the American educational system failure. Can we send these people (the so called journalists who cover politics for leaving) back to elementary school so they can re-learn how to count again?

Melanie   January 21st, 2008 10:25 am ET

Let us not forget...it was Bill Clinton's moral character that forced the nation to turn to the Repulicans and that is why this nation is where we are now (fighting a political war in Iraq, in a recession, millions without health care, country devided and a trillion dollar deficit) It was the first time that I felt I had no choice but to vote Republican. President Clinton literally handed the country over to the rebulican's because they could say 'they" could provide the US with MORAL leadership. Please be quiet Bill!!!!!

Tia   January 21st, 2008 10:25 am ET

IF O wanted to be divisive, the Clintons have MORE than enough he could use against them. But, we're all in this together right? You people talk about the Democratic party and keeping it together, well, who are we fighting? I thought we were fighting the bad ideas from GWB?!?!?! Not each other!!

Al   January 21st, 2008 10:25 am ET

Mr. Obama needs to not bother crying about the issues at hand. His record isn't as straight forward as he portrays. The Clintons have only pointed out the facts. They are not making things up as they go along. Obama says one thing about his record while the fact is that it's not entirely correct.

The race issue was introduced by Mr. Obama. Mrs. Clinton was only pointing out the fact that the bill was enacted into law by the signing president. MLK did not sign this into law nor did he have the power to do so. Simple fact. MLK is very much responsible for the movement and the opening of the eyes of people who had closed them to the proud black people of this nation. MLK will forever be remembered for his great work for this nation as a people. Mr. Obama chose to misconstrue Mrs. Clinton's words. Shame on you sir. The Clintons have done so much for the black community. It wasn't the white community that stated that Bill Clinton was their first black president.

Someone has to point out the facts and not the rhetoric behind it. The Republicans do not play nice. Step up with facts on how you plan to run the country. Great speeches are not going to cut it. You are not running for the UN Ambassador seat. I like Mr. Obama but he's beginning to play the politics that he has "promised" to change in the white house. You're not in church Mr. Obama. We need results, not more speech-filled rhetoric. Your voting record in Congress is not confidential nor are the divisive issues in which you chose to not vote. It seems as though you didn't want to pick a side. This country needs a new leader, not someone who can not make a decision.

May the best candidate win!

shawn   January 21st, 2008 10:24 am ET

Two Questions for Billary. What will be the role of ther former President be in your White House? We do have term limits in our government. As if we didn't learn that lesson from George Bush. Also, if you can't keep your husband under control from saying stupid stuff and lies, then how will you control the United States government. This is one Democrat that does not forget the lie I was told 10 years ago by this man.

Maryann   January 21st, 2008 10:24 am ET

Obana, your wife is way too active than you, travell all over Florida to pick up $$, stumps for you to hit Hillary and more. Hillary never complains she is against 2 of you. One is a husband, one is a wife. Fair game. Don't use title label the role.

The difference here is MEDIA reports Bill, media gives Obama smooth ride. Bill Clinton is on their lips daily. If media is fair, they should report all thing your wife said about Hillary. If you notice, Hillary never hits back on any spause comment, Edwards's wife Elizabeth included. She knows who is playing the game here.
Bottomline, everyone, please ask yourself a good question: Why media is trying so hard to stop Bill from campaigning for his wife ? Think hard, think deep.
Let me remind you another thing, those who push hard on this are Republicans.
AND, THIS IS A SEASON OF PROFITS FOR MEDIA.

WAKE UP, AMERICA. I MEAN IT, WAKE UP.

Corey, Bloomington, IN   January 21st, 2008 10:24 am ET

Everyone who's telling Obama to stop whining, remember when Hillary wouldn't stop moaning about all the mean men ganging up on her poor self at a debate? There's a big difference between saying something someone said about you isn't true and whining. All Obama is doing is trying to do is set the record straight and get back to a civil campaign. If someone called you a liar, wouldn't you have something to say to them?

Tia   January 21st, 2008 10:23 am ET

All of the candidates have their spouses on the trail, but, Michelle is not out there spreading lies about the Clintons! Show me a quote and I'll shut up.

dmw, roeland park,ks   January 21st, 2008 10:23 am ET

Well, we have had to listen to his wife Michelle for all of the campaign as well. That's how it goes. It seems that Obama is now just a complainer because we seem to want more from him than just words. Hope without works is dead.

Laura   January 21st, 2008 10:23 am ET

Obama, just call him a racist again like Al Sharpton told you originally to do. That tactic seems to work for you.

I want to live in an America where I won't be accused of being a racist just because I DISAGREE with Obama.

Support the Republican Party.

Andrew Lee, Nashville, TN   January 21st, 2008 10:22 am ET

35 years of experience doesn't make one a good leader.....it makes them a really good politician. ....which, I thought everyone would have figured out by now....doesn't really exist.

How about we give someone else a try that hasn't become a cog in the machine.

Gina Sasser   January 21st, 2008 10:22 am ET

Barack Hussein Obama's whinings at this point in time shows more weakness than dependability in conflict management. Wayne is right. "If he can't handle the heat now, how does he expect to stand up to the Republicans in the general election?" President Bill Clinton's remarks are based on facts, unlike Michelle Obama's mud-slinging from the very start of her campaigning.

No matter the topic when it comes to Bill & Hillary, working together as a team for the past 30 years as they have when one is attacked, the other joins in on the defensive quickly turning it into offensive against those would-be attackers. I would expect the same when it comes to this Michelle Obama situation.

Congratulations on your victories so far, Hillary! When you win the Presidency, I am sure you will shore up the economy as your husband did so our beloved country will once again be a land of opportunities, and regain the global respect lost during the current administration.

Also, thank you President Bill Clinton, for getting the nation out of debt & leaving a record surplus of which we were all proud. Despite all the right-wing spin against you and Senator Clinton, you both have our respect and gratitude for all that you have done and continue to do for us.

Andrew Lee, Nashville, TN   January 21st, 2008 10:22 am ET

35 years of experience doesn't make one a good leader.....it makes them a really good politician. ....which, I thought everyone would have figured out by now....doesn't really exist.

How about we give someone else a try that hasn't become a cog the machine.

E. C., Houston, Texas   January 21st, 2008 10:22 am ET

Doesn't anyone understand that Obama is far TOO WEAK to be President and the Clintons will be Co-Presidents............which is NOT in our Constitution? Who would want Bill Clinton back in the White House anyway? John Edwards is the ONLY qualified candidate to be representative of the Democratic Party as the Candidate for President. Wake Up, Democrats! TO OBAMA: It takes MORE than Lofty Rhetoric to become President of this great Nation! Further, CHANGE is only a word; Obama hasn't further outlined the word 'Change' or told his supporters just what he would do to effect 'Change.' Obama MUST EXPLAIN ....'Change' Is a Loaded Word.'

Matt   January 21st, 2008 10:22 am ET

Shame on Clintons!!

cathy   January 21st, 2008 10:22 am ET

Will Bill have a seat at the debate tonight?
Do us all a favour – Bill, let Hillary run her own campaign.

oh ya, she won't win on her own – as people are voting for Bill not Hillary!

Go get them Obama!

Glenn   January 21st, 2008 10:21 am ET

Obama isn't whining. He's illuminating the divisive same ol politics of the last 20 years. It seems a few folks in this thread think that's the way politics should be, and if they do, well then Hillary Clinton is definitely the way to go. We can all look forward to 8 years of people misrepresenting the facts instead of getting things done. Now, if on the other hand, we want our government to be a bit more effective, we can vote for Obama, who seems to have a history of being able to get two opposition parties to find favor in at least some part of proposed legislation by appealing to a sense of reason instead of fear or cliches. I wont be bullied, and I wont be fooled. I'm voting for Obama.

interested bystander   January 21st, 2008 10:21 am ET

Oh my, Barak Hussein Obama feels picked upon...

Obama foreign policy – take a number please, Musharref, Bin Laden, ... take numbers please, only one crisis at a time... please, please....Oprah's on line 2, can you hold please...

Jeremy, Jacksonville Fl   January 21st, 2008 10:21 am ET

Obama will get the nomination...........................

Captain America   January 21st, 2008 10:21 am ET

Obama, don't you have Oprah and Kerry on your side?

Dijon   January 21st, 2008 10:21 am ET

What a cry baby!

Now he plays the victim when he's the first one to attack the others and play the race card.

Tim, Seattle   January 21st, 2008 10:21 am ET

JB wrote: "Their team, Hillary as President and Bill as a capable advisor, makes an extremely strong force leading our country. Everyone will feel the same way – foreign governments, congress, etc… "

Not so sure about that. There is no mandate to return to the Clinton era. It was great in the 90's (and I like Bill) but its a different decade with different problems. Almost everyone I talk to doesnt want to go back to the 90's. They want to move forward, with someone who isnt attached to the past so much. No matter how good that decade was economically.

It is naive, I think, to believe people will just 'fall in line' behind Hillary if she becomes the nominee. Most Obama supporters I talk to (count me as one) will be reluctant to make thwe switch just for the sake of party. Some say they will stay home. My Independant freinds say they will go for McCain if she is the nominee but would stay with Obama if he were to become the dem nominee.
Its complex, I wouldnt take the Hillary/Bill slam dunk for granted, She could win the battles but lose the war.
Hillary needs Independants to win this election. Barack is delivering them, Hillary needs to do better at winning them over if she is going to have a chance at winning the general election.

Sharon in FL   January 21st, 2008 10:20 am ET

Stop whining, Obama. You haul out Oprah and your wife and now you're whining about Hillary enlisting her powerful resources for her campaign. Ridiculous! With Obama's weak record, flip flops and crybaby tendencies, he would never survive the Republican swift-boaters. It's obvious Obama isn't ready for prime time politics so he should go home and grow up.

Shawn Killackey, Mundelein, IL   January 21st, 2008 10:20 am ET

Obama is correct that he is battling both Bill & Hillary Clinton. Obviously she can't run for president on her own so she calls in her husband. Gee, I wonder if that's really going to stop if she wins the presidency. If Bill is such a big part of her campaign now, I believe he would be a massive influence in her presidency also. Term number "3" for Bill? I think the former President should take the advise from Sen. Kennedy and keep quiet.

Samuel   January 21st, 2008 10:20 am ET

He feels like he running against both Clintons? Well Hillary feels like she is running against Obama, the progressive blogs , the main stream media, and the Republicans. He should feel fortunate. If he wins the nomination he'll feel like he's running against the Republicans and the the media...so it doesn't get any better. I really like Obama , but he should grow up a little.

Tafoya A. Hubbard   January 21st, 2008 10:19 am ET

Obama is not whining and I will take whining over CRYING anyday!!!! Hilliary cried to get a win in New Hampshire is she going to cry as President when she goes to countries that DO NOT RESPECT women??? Bill Clinton has lost me as a supporter and I will continue to support Barack. Bill already had his turn as President. Barack can hang with the big bad wolf he just called a spade a spade.

KLT   January 21st, 2008 10:19 am ET

For everyone saying Obama cant take the heat.. I say Hillary cant win on her own two feet so she has her husband going around and lying on Obama. I dont need a president who has to have her husband fight her battles for her. When other countries gang up on her is she going to always bring along Bill. If so, why dont we just vote for him again for President because its obvious that she cant do anything without him. I am a life long supporter of the Clintons but the way they have handled themselves in this election not only lost my initial support for Hillary but has also assured that I will vote for someone else should she/he (I'm not sure which one is running anymore) gains the nomination.

Zach   January 21st, 2008 10:19 am ET

Senator Obama is used to getting a free ride from the media which basically hasn't scrutinized his record at all. President Clinton is just saying what a lot of us feel should be said. .

Akobide   January 21st, 2008 10:19 am ET

Who is running for the Presidency? Mr or Mrs. Clinton? I have being a voter to Mrs Clinton for many times but her husbands interference in the campaign is making me think twice. Many of my friends are making the same comments.

Tafoya A. Hubbard   January 21st, 2008 10:18 am ET

Obama is not whining and I will take whining over CRYING anyday!!!! Hilliary cried to get a win in New Hampshire is she going to cry as President when she goes to countries that DO NOT RESPECT women??? Bill Clinton has lost me as a supporter and I will continue to support Barack. Bill already had his turn as President.

EUROPEAN ONLOOKER   January 21st, 2008 10:18 am ET

"I did not have sexual relations with that woman"

Was Bill talking about Hilary when he said that?

WHAT A COMPLETE AND UTTER FARSE. BREAK AWAY FROM THE SLUMBER AND STOP THIS CHILDISH BICKERING OVER THINGS THAT DO NOT MATTER.

It has already been decided (years ago) Hilary will get in the whitehouse for the coming invsasion of Iran.

Anonymous   January 21st, 2008 10:18 am ET

I think that Obama has shown his true side with the comments last week in Nevada about the blacks finally making it and so on. And if he's targeting Bill Clinton, then he's desperate and knows that he's losing. Too bad he can't run this without his comments.

Rick   January 21st, 2008 10:17 am ET

its true, its true, haha, I knew it would come to pass, Bill and Hillary would finally cross the line and they would end up being investigated for their tactics. Its the best thing that could have happened to this race on the democratic side. Come on Bill tell another lie, like I Never Had Sex With That Woman.......

Lizman   January 21st, 2008 10:17 am ET

Obama did not want to be negative in this race but the Clintons are so negative and liars that Obama has to hit back and speak out against their philosophy of ALL IT TAKES TO GET VOTES. It truth people can’t win votes in America, then so be it.
Obama backed by American people will have the American power and will use it worldwide very intelligently for peace and security for Americans and the World. No doubts that, Obama election will change America but also the world…

Ron, TX   January 21st, 2008 10:17 am ET

Bill Clinton is a liar! What?! He'd never lie! He's a good man. He'd never cheat on his wife, not to mention cheat on his wife multiple times. He's never "done drugs"... he tried marijuana once but did it incorrectly... "didn't inhale".

Most believable and honest American ever.

Jabari Woods   January 21st, 2008 10:16 am ET

Obama's wife, Michelle, or Edwards' wife, Elizabeth, may well be able to campaign for their husband's, but neither is an former POTUS. When the former POTUS stands before an audience and makes a claim, true or false, it carries a weight with which only 2 or 3 people in the world can contend. The ex-president should use the power invested in him/her by the people wisely or he/she runs the risk of tarnishing his/her legacy and in so doing bringing ill-repute to the office of POTUS.

.....yet again.

MICHAEL   January 21st, 2008 10:16 am ET

I personally find it reprehensible that a former President has turned into little more than a partisan hack and a political attack dog. The aggressive, no-holds-barred campaigning style of the Clintons proves Obama's point: the political system in America is broken, and another 4-8 years of divisive partisanship will do America- and the world- no good. Unfortunately, the Democratic base seems so intent on re-living its "Clinton glory days" that it is allowing Hillary's campaign to sully a visionary who has the capacity to unite the country at a time when it needs it most. Not to mention hand the presidency to a Republican (a la 2004). As an independent voter, I would be proud to support Barack Obama, but I would rather stay home in November than vote for Hillary Clinton. And I'm not the only one who feels that way.

God Bless America   January 21st, 2008 10:15 am ET

For the record, Obama did not cry. It was HRC that cried the previous time.

Cyndi   January 21st, 2008 10:15 am ET

Bill Clinton has been absolutely shameful. I am so dissappointed. I liked him the nineties. Is this what the White House will be like? With a mean spirited git? Yuck.

Obama gave a moving and uplifting speech on MLK this week at a church in Atlanta AFTER all this junk happened. Good for Obama for staying positive.

Matt in Costa Rica   January 21st, 2008 10:14 am ET

If Bill doesn't shut is big mouth, Obama ought to insist that he sit in on the next presidential debate. How is running for president anyway? Hillary or Bill? I prefer not to have either of these unprincipled poll watchers in the White House again.

Christian   January 21st, 2008 10:14 am ET

How is Obama whining? HE is merely pointing out the fact that Bill Clinton is treating his wife's campaign like it was his own. He is also pointing out how Bill half qouting him on the war issue.

d.a.,
If your son was in Iraq and you were against the war, wouldn't you vote for funding so that he may have a chance to survive?

Hillary vote yes on the war but voted NO on funding. That doesn't make any sense.

Carolyn Wallin   January 21st, 2008 10:14 am ET

Why are there so many negative attacks by the Obama campaign against the Clintons? As a Democrat and a female that is supporting Sen. Clinton I have been ready and willing to support Sen. Obama if he won the nomination "fair and square." Now I am beginning to wonder if I can support him. My message to the Obama campaign is "be careful you do not win the battle and lose the war," If women sit out the next election because they feel Sen. Clinton has been smeared by your campaign, you cannot not win!!

Amy   January 21st, 2008 10:13 am ET

The are NOT "absurd and laughable" – my daughter was there and saw first hand Clinton supporters slapping stickers on undecided voters, having signs all over the front of the school and at registration tables, and closing the doors early. Clinton volunteers – or whoever – had been there 2 hours before the Obama supporters and were clearly intending to run to the show. We all know the Clintons (both of them) will do ANYTHING to win, so why would anyone be surprised. Democrats who want that sleazy couple in the White House again are either insane or absolutely ignorant and the rest of us will have to suffer for their stupidity.

JDS N.C.   January 21st, 2008 10:13 am ET

Maybe Bill needs to step back and let his wife run her own campaign. Wouldnt that be the feminist thing to do? True feminists would deplore so much fending for her by her husband? Bill wont be bailing her out if she were to be in the white house?

Zach   January 21st, 2008 10:13 am ET

Cry baby!!!

Fred Washignton   January 21st, 2008 10:12 am ET

oh wow exaclty why HRC is getting this 27 y/o african american's vote...what a cry baby

liz, fairmont, mn   January 21st, 2008 10:12 am ET

I used to have a huge amount of respect for Bill Clinton. And Hillary too. But not anymore. Their behavior ever since Hillary lost Iowa has been awful. It's like watching a two-year-old throw a protracted tantrum. Bleeck.

Not only am I more firmly supporting Obama than ever, now I'm not sure that this lifelong Democrat could vote Democrat if Hillary got the nomination.

RICH, NY   January 21st, 2008 10:12 am ET

THESE COMMENTS I'VE BEEN READING ARE SHOCKING THIS IS NOT ABOUT HOW WILL OBAMA HANDLE THE REPUBLICAN ATTACK MACHINE OR OTHER WORLD LEADERS ATTACKING HIM. THIS IS ABOUT THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND HOW ONE MAN IS TRING TO CHANGE THE HEARTS AND MINDS OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE TO BEGIN TO SWITCH THE WAY WE DO BUSINESS! OUR POLITICS ARE DAMAGING OUR IMAGE AROUND THE WORLD!!! "TO WIN AT ALL COST" MIND SET IS NOT WHAT WE NEED TO BE PROJECTING TO THE WORLD. MR. CLINTON WON THE PRESIDENCY BASE ON THE ISSUES HE RAN ON REMEMBER "IT'S THE ECONOMY STUPID" THERE IS NO NEED TO DISTORT THE FACTS OR LIE ABOUT ANOTHER CANIDATE. JUST TELL THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WHAT YOUR PLANS FOR OUR FUTURE ARE AND HOW YOU WILL DEAL WITH THE PROBLEMS WE FACE. THEN LET US DECIDE WHO WE FEEL IS BEST TO RUN THIS COUNRTY AND THE WORLD! AFTER ALL WE ARE SUPPOSE TO BE SELLING OUR NUMBER 1 PRODUCT WE HAVE WHICH IS DEMOCRACY!!! NOW HOW ARE WE TO SHOW HOW DEMOCRACY WORKS IF WE ALLOW PEOPLE TO LIE AND CHEAT TO WIN!! JUST STOP AND THINK BEFORE YOU VOTE!!!

Paul, Tampa, FL   January 21st, 2008 10:12 am ET

I was always a great defender and supporter of Bill Clinton, but no more. I have seen a side of Clinton that my prior perspective as a longtime democrat and Clinton defender had blinded me to. I can now understand the vitriol that the Republicans always held for Bill. I had always previously thought that it was an irrational feeling. No more. His legacy is now greatly diminished by his misrepresentations and, frankly, lies about his wife's opponent.

I never thought I would say this, but I will NEVER vote for his wife. I would rather support a one term republican like McCain and hope that the Democrats offer a non-Clinton candidate in 2014.

corky   January 21st, 2008 10:12 am ET

Bill Clinton has every right to defend his wife and the facts are the facts whether you like them or not. Obama has had a free ride from the press Hillary was chewed up and spit out and survived. Obama brought ou the race card and played it for all it was worth but then realized it was not to his advantage to do so. Obama campaign has used a lot of distorted tactics against Hillary and this is where it all started. Stop whining Obama and move on with the issues affecting U.S.A. today after we are in the year of 2008 not in the sixties time to move on.

Carol   January 21st, 2008 10:12 am ET

Obama proves with his whining that we need someone who has been in the game and knows how to win. Obama's never played the game. He needs to get some experience and come back in eight years. The Republicans will decimate him if he's our candidate now.

tracey   January 21st, 2008 10:10 am ET

CNN – WHY SO MUCH PRESS ON BARACK OBAMA AND NOT HILLARY CLINTON?

PLAYING FAVS ARE YOU...BAD BOYS CNN, BAD BOYS!

Jim   January 21st, 2008 10:09 am ET

To the people that have commented on Obama's ability to take a punch, I say this, at least he didn;t break down and start bauling on national television. What kind of a leader would that make in the face of our enemys? Do you think she was faking it ? hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm,

Matt   January 21st, 2008 10:09 am ET

This isn't about him not being able to "take the heat." This is about him responding to attacks and distortions. Sen Obama comes from a background in Chicago politics, the most brutal political arena in the country, so it's not like he isn't used to this sort of thing . One thing learned from the 2004 Swift Boat controversy is that you HAVE to respond when you're attacked, or people will assume the attacks have merit. It is therefore completely appropriate for Obama to address the lies and distortions that come from our former president.

The sad thing with re: Pres. Clinton is that his ferocity during this campaign greatly deflates the "international statesman" role he's tried to carve for himself over the last few years. Now he just looks like an angry ex-president who will say whatever he thinks will help his spouse get elected.

Mary Edwards, Alton, IL   January 21st, 2008 10:09 am ET

I hope Obama has his back covered--the Clintons will do whatever it takes to win the presidency.

R.C.   January 21st, 2008 10:08 am ET

When this race started, I was ambivalent toward Hillary but would support her in the general. However, the Clintons' decision to marginalize Obama as "the black candidate", and to try to pit Latinos against African Americans, and women against men, is disgusting. Team Clinton's campaign strategy seems to be to exploit and play to racism and sexism in this society.

I am a firm believer in Obama. If Clinton wins, I'll be staying home on election day.

123   January 21st, 2008 10:08 am ET

what did hilary do when she lost new hampshire, did she not almost break down in tears?talking of strong character in the face of adversities as president no offence to the womenfolk but the fact is, its a hot seat and a strong character is a must.you cant keep former president clinton out of this because it is only natural that he will support is wife but the manner must befit a former president so as to maintain respect.

Janet   January 21st, 2008 10:07 am ET

The "facts are the facts". Delegates won in Nevada – Obama – 13, Clinton – 12. Barack Obama is a man of integrity and strong character. Wouldn't you defend yourself if you were in his position? I think so. No one wants their words or efforts to be misconstrued, especially when it is done deliberately for someone's own personal gain. Look at the candidates and consider which one has the most respect for the American people. It would be Barack Obama, hands down!

tracey   January 21st, 2008 10:07 am ET

THE TRUE OBAMA WILL EVENTUALLY BE EXPOSED. BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU WISH FOR AMERICA...TOO MUCH CHANGE IS GONNA GET YOU.

s.positive   January 21st, 2008 10:07 am ET

Like I sad earlier, when it is your time, no amount of obstacle can stop you if you believe and perceiver...

L.S   January 21st, 2008 10:05 am ET

"OBAMA" ..........YOU SAY THAT YOU FEEL LIKE YOU ARE RUNNING AGAINST BOTH CLINTONS? WELL WAKE UP AND SMELL THE COFFEE, BECAUSE YOU ARE, THEY ARE A TEAM AND THEY WILL PLAY A TEAM WHEN HILARY IS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, I AM GLAD THAT YOU REALIZE THAT NOW BECAUSE THAT IS HOW THEY WILL OPERATE TOGETHER IN THE WHITE HOUSE, A TEAM EFFORT, TWO FOR THE PRICE OF ONE AND GUESS WHAT??? EXPERIENCE WILL PLAY A BIG PART IN THIS PRESIDENT POSITION. THE WAY BUSH HAS THIS COUNTRY GOING NOW....WE NEED SOMEONE WITH EXPERIENCE TO GET THIS COUNTRY BACK ON IT'S POSITIVE DIRECTION, NOT SOMEOME THAT IS LEARNING AS THEY GO ALONE. I AM NOT TAKING ANYTHING AWAY FROM YOU OBAMA, BUT WE ARE GETTING TWO PEOPLE THAT WILL KNOW HOW TO RUN THE COUNTRY FOR THE PRICE OF ONE VOTE".

Ron in CT   January 21st, 2008 10:05 am ET

The more I hear from Obama, the less I care for him as a candidate. Yes, indeed, he is a whiner. Barak...get over it! Put your big boy pants on!

Paul, Miami florida   January 21st, 2008 10:05 am ET

Obama plays if not dirtier politics. He's splitting the black vote for his own devices. His operatives in Nevada were strong arming Clinton supporters at the hotels. Bill Clinton was and should have raised the alarm. That is the dirtiest form of politics known. The real loosers in all of this are the black people. There's gonna be a backlash on all this dirty politics. Its discusting. How come we haven't seen much of Obama's wife lately? Interesting...

Darryl   January 21st, 2008 10:05 am ET

You all are talking like the Clinton years before was the best, Bill did not do much when he was in office the first time....and this is the same Bill Clinton that "did not have sexual relations with that woman." He lied to america then with a straight face and is still no good to us now, why go back to the same ol crap that we been through already, might as well take a diffrent direction what worse could happen the country is already in the toliet, no where to go but up and putting Billary in office is not the answer.

tracey   January 21st, 2008 10:05 am ET

IT'S THE OBAMAS WHO ARE NOT PLAYING FAIR...RUDE, RUDE, RUDE...MRS. OBAMA...RUDE

Funny that when Mrs. Obama says rude things about The Clintons "can't keep their own House (cheating) why would you trust them in the White House. Barack and I know how to keep house...(not cheating).

GIVE US A BREAK!!!!!!!!!!!

Jeffer Phurm   January 21st, 2008 10:04 am ET

And Ophra was not? I love and deeply admire Ophra and I like Mr. Obama and I think the man would make an excellent president one day, but not now; why? clout. Right now we need a familar face to get us out of the absolute mess lttle george has gotten us into.

elaine luna   January 21st, 2008 10:04 am ET

PAR DON ME BUT I MUST BE A LITTLE DENSE. WHICH CLINTON IS RUNNING FOR OFFICE???? BILL OR HILLIARY???

Cheryl   January 21st, 2008 10:04 am ET

HERE IS A LITTLE FACTOID FOR OBAMA- IF YOU CANNOT HANDLE THIS THEN HOW WILL YOU HANDLE THE REPUBLICANS IF YOU DO WIN THE NOMINATION? I HOPE EVERYONE REALIZES THAT AND VOTES FOR HILLARY. THIS GUY HAS WAY TO MANY SKELETONS IN THE CLOSET. THAT CAN EASILY BE PULLED OUT AND USED TO BEAT HIM AND WE WILL END UP WITH A REPUBLICAN AGAIN. DO NOT MAKE THAT MISTAKE! VOTE FOR HILLARY SHE CAN BEAT THEM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

JuleS, Chicago   January 21st, 2008 10:04 am ET

I don't know if this is simply a case of poor reporting on the part of CNN, or a smoke-and-mirrors ploy by the Obama campaign - but nowhere in this story are put forth any particular statement(s), actions or situations that prove out Onbama's accusation.

If Obama's spokespeople refused to cite such examples when asked by the reporters, it should have been so noted in the story here - and knowing any good reporter, he or she would have asked. The fact that this is not noted leads me to believe that the reporter(s) failed in their very basic duties.

Which makes for this poorly reported story, and makes Obama look like he's whining about the other kids not playing fair, just to have something to complain about. That may be the case, but judicious reporting and substantiative testimony from Obama are sorely lacking in both story and circumstance.

larry fort wayne. indiana   January 21st, 2008 10:03 am ET

there are plenty of good women that are head of their country,but how many had to rely on their husband to get elected...now that's pathetic. If she can't stand on her own, then she is not "ready on day one"

ED orlando fl   January 21st, 2008 10:02 am ET

Quit crying Barack you are trying out for the big leagues now. More and more your[everybody is picking on me] theory sounds more like Al sharpton and Jesse Jackson. your experience level is staring to show more and more[less and less].You need to try and back up what you preach instead of crying out about the systems means and ways which have been around a long time. America does not need a whiner to stand up against the world.

Seth   January 21st, 2008 10:02 am ET

It is a Joke when someone says Obama cannot handle the heat but Clinton can. Everyone knew Clinton was almost in tears in NH when she was trailing by double digits. So is that good quality of President? No president can be too emotional when the going gets tough. That shows the weakness of person and America needs strong President. I am Democrat, and if Hillary gets nominated I am voting for republican.

charles   January 21st, 2008 10:02 am ET

I supported Bill Clinton strongly. I hated G.W.Bush from the disputed Florida s/election in 2000. I never thought Bush positively in any aspect of his Presidency, not for even one second. Now, I hate Bill Clinton. For the sake of America's future, Bill and Hillary Clinton should fade into History along with G.W.Bush. They, both Bush-Clinton, represent the Political cancer of this country. Without them, our country will be much much better off. We have a better chance of rescuing the country and the world from the few critical problems.

Bill Clinton, you are no loinger my former President. As a Democrat, I despise you.

John, Pittsburgh   January 21st, 2008 10:01 am ET

Oh, is Hillary still running for president? I didn't realize she was still running cause after she lost Iowa it seemed as though Bill started running for president. If Hillary becomes the first woman president it really doesn't seem fair for the next woman who accually wins on her own. Not to mention THIS IS AMERICA, STOP PUTTING THE SAME TWO FAMILIES IN THE WHITE HOUSE.

charlotte   January 21st, 2008 10:01 am ET

If Bill wasn't out there what would people say? I can just hear it, her own husband doesn't support her Your family is important to your campaign. Obamas' wife Michelle is on the trail, why shouldn't Hillarys' husband Bill be on the trail? This is historic, never before have we been in this type of contest. I have been voting since JFK and this is the first time I have been on the Net. This is the year of FIRST TIMES. It is exciting, the first time minorities have taken on such an important role, first time women, (since Susan B Anthony) have had a real voice. May be the first time, being the last state to have a primary, will play a pivitol role. First time states have been stripped of delegates for moving their primaries. Race, Religion and Gender all in one election year. GO AMERICA, I lOVE YOU

Greg in OH   January 21st, 2008 10:01 am ET

No, the Clintons are worse than the Republicans. They want to win at all costs and no else matters. Bill even said that his legacy does not matter as long as he wins now.

matthew   January 21st, 2008 10:00 am ET

Someone doesn't like losing...and i think his name is Barack Obama.

You sound just like a politician...oh wait, you are a politician. I forgot that you enjoy pretending you aren't.

Stop complaining and whining because you aren't getting your way. you lost NH, MI and NV, move on or drop out. Just don't complain because you think everyone is out to get you. Imagine if you were running against a republican candidate...just think of the tactics they'd use.

These "tactics" are just friendly hellos compared to what the republicans will bring on if you make it to the general election. Butch up Obama!

Dusacre   January 21st, 2008 10:00 am ET

The Clintons will do and say anything to get back to the Whitehouse. They are polarizing the democratic base. It will be very difficult (if not impossible) to unite Obama's supporters around Hillary if she gets the nomination.

MB   January 21st, 2008 10:00 am ET

What's with all the whining by Obama? His wife is out there doing the same thing Bill Clinton is doing for his spouse. I don't see anyone piling on her for her remarks. It's called campaigning folks. If Obama can't take the heat of this type of campaign, I shudder to think if he wins the nomination. This is softball compared to what the Republicans have in store for him or any other person who wins the nomination.

If he wants to be a serious contender for President, he needs to quit the "woe is me" and give us some solid information on how he intends to bring about all the change he's asking everyone to believe in. What is his plan and how will he be able to carry it out?

I still think Hillary is the candidate to get the most done for the US. She will have my vote.

Tom Davie   January 21st, 2008 9:59 am ET

I can already see it now :

Republican spin doctor :

So Senator Obama, you are a fan of Ronald Reagan ?

Obama : well what I said was ........um......his VISION to unite the Republican party.

Republican spin doctor:

And your idea of UNITING the Democratic party is to Glorify a REPUBLICAN ?

Too   January 21st, 2008 9:59 am ET

When things get hot HRC cries and then gets her husband to go play the attack dog for her...certainly gives the legitimate strong women a bad name. Go Obama!!!! you are gonna win, Bill or no Bill.

matt   January 21st, 2008 9:59 am ET

Folks what we see Obama doing is no different than similar moves Hillary has made. He isn't whining or being weak, he is simply pointing out a problem. The Clintons are using exactly the kind of "anything goes" politics that he is refusing to use. Yes, Michelle is out speaking for him, but she is not using the back door to accuse other candidates. Her message is the same positive one as her husband's.

Go Obama – remind us of the power of words to inspire and motivate a country

Kathy   January 21st, 2008 9:58 am ET

This is just depressing. I am so sick of the Clinton dynasty, the Clinton machine, Clinton tactics, Clinton deception... Haven't these two done enough to debase the office already??

dm   January 21st, 2008 9:58 am ET

I wish they would stick to the issue and stop the lies and twisting of words.. HC and Obama are both very smart and intelligent indivudals and I believe could stand on their own without all this crap from someone whom a lot of people respect (ed)?. A former president does not to stoop to the level that Bill Clinton has. Winning at "all/any" cost is a sure way to lose the respect of many people in the end. Quite frankly, I don't believe Hillary can win, eventhough I suspect she will get the nomination - and! he needs to stop the coded messages or someone should call him on it every time he speaks one. This is 2008 and the majority of Americans should be color blind or at least striving very hard to be... It's unfortunate that they have tried and appeared to have succeeded to catagorize Obama as the "Black" candidate. This historic moment in our history has been blimished with the underhandedness with which the Clintons have been running their campaign. From the beginning I was an undecided Democrat – but I believe the Clintons are trying to divide the votes between racial lines knowing that this will definitely be a "roll of the dice" (to take a phrase from the Clinton campaign)..
Unfortunate indeed !

Lou   January 21st, 2008 9:58 am ET

Exactly! If you can't stand the heat during the Democratic Primary, just think of the General Election? The Republicans will quickly swift boat Obama if he doesn't learn how to handle the big attacks! You have to be able to handle anything that comes at you. The response needs to be quick , effective, and constant. It's a media war machine out there! If you can't survive that, you don't deserve to be President because once you are President, not only America but the whole world will try to critize you. You can never please everyone. It's just part of the job to handle criticism and move on to the next project.

KT   January 21st, 2008 9:57 am ET

Who is whining? Hillary! She didn't say anything for almost YEAR about the caucus sites in the casinos and then when she didn't get the endorsement from the culinary union, all of a sudden it's "poor me, he's not fighting fair!". Get real people!

I find it interesting that Hillary (& Bill) claim that Obama has voted in support of the war....he's voted like most other democrats INCLUDING HILLARY, to fund OUR TROOPS, not the war! Every one of the democrats I've heard has said that they are voting for funding because they SUPPORT OUR TROOPS! The difference that Hillary and Bill are afraid of people noticing is Obama was speaking out about the possibility of war before it actually was a war and Hillary can't claim that...she supported the war up and until it became unpopular to do so!

I'm neither a democrat nor a republican. I'm an AMERICAN who cares about the issues facing this country. The definition of chaos is "doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different outcome". Hillary is the same thing over and over. She's part of the Washington culture from her days as first lady. She claims 35 years of experience....where? She was somebody's WIFE!! And her lawyer years don't count as public experience....it was her CAREER! She thinks that we are stupid and she can distort her record any which way she pleases. She became a senator, someone independent from Bill within the last decade!!! Yet she puts Obama down for his supposed inexperience!

I was relatively undecided until the last few weeks and that's when my anger kicked in against Hillary. When I saw her & Bill start distorting Obama's comments about Reagan, bringing up the race issue and then putting on this angel halo and pretending to play nice at the Nevada debate, it turned my stomach. We need someone REAL people. This country faces HUGE challenges and we need someone truthful and strong to tackle them!

Mark Cary, NC   January 21st, 2008 9:57 am ET

Once again, Obama is demonstarting how green he is in the political arena. Bill has made valid points and the Obama camp tries to distort what Bill is doing. But what Bill is doing is bringing attention to something the media ha failed to cover effectively about Senator Obama and that is his record. My other concern is how is Obama going to handle other presidents and leaders in this owrld who disagree with him? Is he going to give his state of the union address to the American people and say how unfair and mean the other leaders are being. We need a storng leader in this world and this dispaly by Obama has truly shown he is not ready for primetime.

Weez   January 21st, 2008 9:57 am ET

I feel like I'm watching a match between Serena Williams and a talented opponent. Serena loses a point, and suddenly Venus runs on to the court. Together they crush the other player. Does the crowd stand up and cheer?

Democratic primary/caucus voters who support Hillary might turn a blind eye to the Clintons ganging up on Obama, thinking the end justifies the means. But it's going to backfire in the general election. Americans demand fundamental fairness in their elections, and are going to be sickened to watch one candidate being double teamed by Billary.

I used to enthusiastically support Hillary, but no longer feel there would be anything to celebrate if she wins. We would not have the first female elected president – we would have the first power couple elected president. I hope I live to see a female candidate win the presidency by running on her OWN credentials, not by hanging on to her husband's coattails with both fists.

James   January 21st, 2008 9:57 am ET

He needs to stop whining and start talking his plans instead of making gradeous speeches about bringing on "movement" and "change". MLK already did the big thing bringing in civil rights. Now it's time to give some substance to his speeches of 'change'. And what is he complaining about? He has support from the Oprah who is great enterainment mogul herself. Nobody said anything about it. What does he expect Bill to do; sit at home and watch people attack his wife with ridiculous and even false accusations. He is Hillary's husband, he is out supporting her just like his wife is. Fortunatley for Hillary, her husband turns out to be former president who (except for the personal record) has a very good record during his presidency. Every president faces come kind of huge problem,he did pretty good overall, infact he is one of the best presidents in history.
Plus this is politics. We need to chose a political leader who knows how to play the game. Politics will never change (although someone fancies with the idea od changing politics). Politics is politics, if you are not careful it will change you. A good politicians knows how to play the game and get the results he wants.

robert l gray   January 21st, 2008 9:57 am ET

same old cry that they are being descrimated aganist they get a free ride on everything

Peg   January 21st, 2008 9:57 am ET

Quit saying, you Hillary supporters that Obama is "whining...." How is it any different than "tearing up" or saying "that hurts my feelings....."? I think this is pretty good "whining". Obama is merely responding to their attempts to discredit his record or what he says. No different than what she does. They both whine....

Also d.a. it's a known fact that the REPUBLICANS REALLY WANT hILLARY TO BE THE NOMINEE BECAUSE THEY KNOW THEY CAN BEAT HER!!! JUST LOOK AT THE POLLS OF THE GENERAL ELECTION AND WHAT HAPPENS WHEN SHE RUNS AGAINST ANY REPUBLICAN NOMINEE.........keep yourself informed!

Cheryl   January 21st, 2008 9:57 am ET

I THINK THAT IT IS RIDICULOUS THAT HE IS COMPLAINING! HIS WIFE STARTED SAYING BAD THINGS ABOUT HILLARY IN THE VERY BEGINNING OF THE CAMPAIGN. WHY IS IT OK FOR THEM BUT NOT FOR ANYONE ELSE? HILLARY IS AHEAD OF HIM THAT IS WHAT THE PROBLEM IS. BILL IS MERELY POINTING OUT THAT HIS RECORD IS NOT WHAT HE SAYS IT IS. HILLARY IS A PROVEN LEADER HER RECORD REFLECTS THIS. WE NEED A LEADER IN THE WHITE HOUSE WE ARE IN A TERRIBLE MESS. HILLARY IS THE RIGHT ONE. VOTE CLINTON 08

Troy   January 21st, 2008 9:56 am ET

If what happened with the voting in Nevada was a Dem vs Rep there would be protests, riots, maybe even worse, but the fact it was Dem vs Dem we hear little about it. They are all crooks...Where's Ross Perot when you need him? Can someone say Bloomberg.

John, N.H   January 21st, 2008 9:56 am ET

Hillary = 51%
John+Obama=49%

Jesse, Burnsville, MN   January 21st, 2008 9:56 am ET

I find it interesting that Hillary supporters cannot see that Hillary is not only divisive to the entire electorate, she is divisive within the Democratic Party. I have been a Democrat my whole life, been an officer in the local Democratic Party, and worked for Democratic campaigns. I'm tired of the politics of divisiveness. I'm sick of it that politicians can no longer work together to get things done for the greater good (and it's not only Republicans, Democrats need to look in the mirror as well). Is it possible for politicians to always agree, NO. Is it possible for politicians to be civil and work together, it should be.

The generation of divisiveness needs to end. As a lifelong Democrat, I will state right now that there is no way I would vote for Hillary in the general election should she win the Democratic nomination. She is intelligent and strong, but unfortunately she is also cold and calculating and is willing to use surrogates to tear apart her competition. The way she has used surrogates to tear down Obama only serves to remind me of how Bush, Rove, and Cheney used Scooter and others to tear down Valerie Plame because Mr. Wilson didn't agree with the Bush Administration on Iraq and was willing to voice it publicly. How do you think Hillary would react to dissention if she were President? The thought depresses me.

Jersey Girl   January 21st, 2008 9:55 am ET

He lost again, it had nothing to do with Bill Clinton, he lost simply because the PEOPLE voted for HILLARY. He's a cry baby. He will never win.

Eric in Massachusetts   January 21st, 2008 9:55 am ET

:-) Baracka Hussein Obama, the great uniter, is on a crash course with destiny... self destruction. February 5th my friends. He and his campaign are already starting to crumble.

What's wrong Baracka? Is Oprah and Usher on your campaign trail not enough for you? I can't fathom that a political candidate is complaining because his opponent's spouse is involved in the campaign. He's crying foul. Unbelievable. Well, at least the American people are beginning to see the real Baracka Hussein Obama. The crybaby. Is Hillary crying to the press that Oprah is stumping for Obama?

The Baracka Hussein Obama campaign is showing their inexperience and lack of class. They never put a stop to the racist ads in Nevada. Obama never congratulates Hillary on her wins. Too bad. This is the guy you want to run the largest super power in the World? I don't think so.

Greg in Istanbul   January 21st, 2008 9:54 am ET

Is this the same Barrack Obama who campaigned with Oprah Winfrey in South Carolina to win over both the black and the women vote? What goes around comes around, and if Mr. Obama is going to be a truly viable candidate, he must develop a stronger resolve. Crying every time one of the Clintons responds negatively about him isn't doing him a whole lot of good. One would imagine that this would be fodder for his next stand-up routine. Get over it, Obama and tout your own record, not destroy hers.

checkthisout   January 21st, 2008 9:54 am ET

RUNNING AGAINST BOTH CLINTONS ????

OBAMA SEEMS TO FORGET HIS TAG TEAM PARTNER, JOHN EDWARDS.

LOL.

J   January 21st, 2008 9:54 am ET

I wonder what becomes of Bill Clinton's legacy after this campaign? Just look at how divided the dems have become. Why does Hillary always refer to Republicans as the supposed enemy in her statements and . These are also american people. She is just too divisive for my support.

Go Obama!

John   January 21st, 2008 9:53 am ET

Honestly, Bill Clinton just needs to fade away into the backround. He is a Proven liar, an adulterer, and sold american jobs down the river with NAFTA...

If CNN is going to cover Bill Clinton so much, they need to treat him like a candidate and check into and confront Bill Clinton on what he says about Hillary;s opponents. Its not fair that CNN gives a non-candidate a forum and allows Clinton to use CNN to bash Obama, and then watch as CNN broadcasts it worldwide, with no fact checking.

i guess CNN = CLINTON NEWS NETWORK..

Jay   January 21st, 2008 9:53 am ET

"Somebody had to expose Obamas flip flops and am glad Bill Clinton is doing it."

There aren't any flip-flops, just the former president belligerently distorting Obama's record like a drunken frat-boy.

Lisa Hampton Newark, NJ   January 21st, 2008 9:53 am ET

Obama is man of high integrity and morals. He has god on his side. If many in the Democratic party continues to support people like the clintons it says alot about their moral compass. Obama you are in my prayers.

Carl   January 21st, 2008 9:52 am ET

Obama needs to understand–as if he didn't before–the Clintons and their political operatives will stop at nothing–repeat, nothing– to get back to the White House. All you need do is look at the cast of characters involved. In fact, if I were him, I'd hire a good mechanic to make sure every day that the brakes on his campaign vehicle are in good working order.

Linda   January 21st, 2008 9:52 am ET

Obama has Oprah and her money on his side. I would say the playing field is level.

Kathleen Kissimmee FL   January 21st, 2008 9:51 am ET

I agree quit whining Obama, is that what your going to do
when your President? It's like your fixated on who's picking
on you...and we are suppose to picture you as a President?

Personally, I think they should bring to light more on your Islamic
background...namely you can't pledge allegiance to the flag
because your what...more Islamic than American? Do you
plan on getting sworn in on the Holy Quran like you did when
you first became a Senator?

What's wrong with America needs to be fixed by an American..
race doesn't enter it...just your ability to be 100pct American..
someone that can actually "Pledge Allegiance to the Flag" and
mean it..

Irene, Clearwater, FL   January 21st, 2008 9:51 am ET

If he can't deal with what basically appears to be softballing, what on Earth is he going to do when the Republican smear machine starts spraying mud all over the horizon. I've already heard some of the conservative radio hosts gearing up about his drug use, his church preacher being a racist and his lack of leadership in his short time in congress.

He hasn't even taken a fraction of the crap hurled at Hilary for the past several years, or even months–from her clothing to her laugh to her tearing up to her staying with her husband to on and on.

Deal with it, Obama. Show us you've got the stuff or step off.

andy   January 21st, 2008 9:51 am ET

Have the American people forgotten that Bill Clinton lied to Congress and to them constantly? H.C. should be fighting for the nomination on her own political
strength, and not on her husband's record? Do you really want the Clintons in the White House again?

Obama deserves the Democratic nomination.

j williamson   January 21st, 2008 9:51 am ET

Barack, if you can't stand up to the Clintons then how are you going to stand up to leaders of terrorist states? You're in the big-time now – what did you expect, a cake-walk? You're not a victim – your campaign has hit the Hillary pretty hard, but they can take it and, it seems, you can't. Like I said, welcome to the big-time.

david   January 21st, 2008 9:51 am ET

Well, we all know that Bill is slimy, but didn't mind it so much when the slime went the way of the Republicans. However, when the slime spews against fellow Democrats, especially someone of the integrity and class of Obama, the Clinton's reveal how slimy and obsessed with power they really are. I hope Obama hits back and calls the Clinton's on their dirty tricks and politics.

Ash   January 21st, 2008 9:51 am ET

I have to agree with the main concept. As a life long Democrat, I am a big fan of Bill Clinton and the many accomplishments of his presidency. I have a lot of respect for him. But I do support obama's campaign, because of his focus and message of unity – I think another Clinton presidency, however competent, will be a continuation of the days of bitter partisan politics. But i am disappointed with the way Bill has been conducting himself – it is very unbecoming of a two-term and extremely popular former President. He keeps losing his tempter, pointing fingers, his face turning purple – what the heck?? Can you imagine a Carter or a Bush Sr doing this every week in the media? We all expect he supports his wife's campaign and candidacy, but the way he's been presenting himself -I think he is compromising his own position and legacy. And Obama is fighting off both of them.

PHil   January 21st, 2008 9:50 am ET

To everyone here suggesting that Obama is whining, ask yourself how Bill's statements about Obama aren't themselves instances of whining. Come on! Obama is just trying to correct the record. Why is correcting the record whining?

My view and the view of many of my friends is that Bill and Hillary are proving themselves to be unworthy of a vote. We thought that 2008 meant an end to Rovian politics, but we were wrong. If Hillary wins the nom she will lose MANY votes. I can't bring myself to vote for a Republican. But I will not vote for her.

Dave NY NY   January 21st, 2008 9:50 am ET

Oh, poor Obama. So the comments your wife makes that are 'fast and loose' don't have the same effect.

Pull yourself together and stop whining. If you've got dirt, it's gonna get aired. It doesn't matter if Hillary Clinton or any of the other candidates do it. If they're speaking a lick of truth in their accusations then you've got some explaining to do.

Stop whining and be a man.

samuel   January 21st, 2008 9:49 am ET

This questions is for those who support hillary clinton.
1.Why do you think the senators who have been in senate for long time endores barrak obama particularly red state because they know barrak is the only candidate who can bring the country together and who can beat the republican for the general election.the polls also shows the same thing.
2. Why do you think college educated and intellectual people support and vote for barrak obama but non-college educated support hillary clinton.why ? who is honest in this historical race.
i want some one who can explain to me in detail.

Moderate In Florida   January 21st, 2008 9:48 am ET

I have spent years defending Bill Clinton, both during his presidency and afterwards. Now, with the disgraceful way he is manipulating Obama's statements, through using incomplete quotes and out-and-out misquotes, I have not more slack to cut for Bill. He has always been a liar, but, somehow, I tried to look past his lying problem because (1) it was generally about personal matters, such as cheating on his wife, and (2) I believed that he was out fighting for the middle and lower classes. In fact, when I now look back on Clinton's record, I see a politician who consistently co-opted the Republicans' issues, such as welfare reform, to remain in power, and that he, in reality, did nothing for me and my economic peers. His presidency was all about himself. Now, in this election, he is doing and saying ANYTHING, including OUTRIGHT LIES, to get his wife elected. It's about his wife, but, mainly, IT"S ALL ABOUT BILL TRYING TO GET BACK TO THE WHITE HOUSE. BILL CLINTON IS A DISGRACE, HIS WIFE IS EITHER 100% COMPLICIT OR CAN'T CONTROL HIM (EITHER WAY SPELLS BIG TROUBLE). BILL CLINTON WILL GET NO MORE SUPPORT FROM ME, HIS LEGACY IS NOW PERMANENTLY TARNISHED, AND I AM NOW GOING TO POUR 100% OF MY SUPPORT TO BARACK OBAMA, a modern-day DAVID going against the tag-team Clinton GOLIATH!!!

Tommy   January 21st, 2008 9:48 am ET

Obama should STOP whining!!!

He knew what he was coming into... He should have waited 8 more years to get more experience.

But now, loss after loss, he is playing the Race Card, then the Whining Card....

What a TURN OFF!!!!!!!!!!! Booooo.

David: Charlotte, NC   January 21st, 2008 9:48 am ET

Now let's see..... When Hillary says she is being unfairly treated then the press and Obama camp say she is whining.....

As for those who think Obama will bring the country together, they are looking through rose tinted glasses that are out of focus. What will happen when it is clear that Obama can't be both a Republican and a Democrat? He will have disenfranchised both groups. He is trying to be all things to all groups. He will say or do anything to get votes. His campaign reminds me of the way George W. Bush ran his campaign. I would hope that voters had learned a lesson.

Obama doesn't have the skills or integrity to be President. Wake up America!

Baggs   January 21st, 2008 9:48 am ET

Bill Clinton is a liar...If Bill Clinton stuck with the truth his efforts would not be a problem...Lets see..I didnt have sex with that women..remember this statement....
He lied to the American people on TV and face to face..Bill Clinton can not / will not tell the truth. He brought down the office of the president... Now he is bring down the 2008 dem race...image the additional harm he would cause in the white house again.

betty   January 21st, 2008 9:47 am ET

Thank you Toni, JB, and d.a. for your comments I agree.

carolyn   January 21st, 2008 9:46 am ET

I hate to admit it but what Obama fear is true. Bill Clinton will certainly be the next vice -president if Hillary wins. I pitty whoever is vice-president. You'll be better off losing Obama.

larry fort wayne. indiana   January 21st, 2008 9:45 am ET

all I can say is some of you fellow democrats are in a dream. There is no doubt Bill has distorted the truth..it is on tape and for you fellow dems that say keep telling the truth you need to wake up. We are all democrats why does he have to trash B.O. to make her look good. Let her record stand on it's own as soon as they release it. At the end of this campain do you really think some of us that are not blind and can really tell the difference between the truth and a lie will turn aroun a vote for her. I am a democrat but I have voted for republicans too and I have no problem doing it again. I am an american first and I don't hate republicans but what Bill is doing I do hate.You Hillary people think she can win and govern this country well with just blind democrats on her side you are crazy. If she wants to attack B.O. let her do it with facts and not hide behind her husband. And lets see her White House records before we decide on a president...it may all be a lie. The only proof we have is her word and that is just not good enough.

Awaiting Moderation, USA   January 21st, 2008 9:45 am ET

I'm sorry, but to those of you who are saying that Barack is the one whining...I disagree. I've been following this race very closely. Since Iowa, Bill Clinton has been on a whining fast track–even bringing daughter Chelsea into it.

As far as Michelle Obama is concerned, has anyone witnessed her lashing out at the press, finger wagging, spreading rumors of voter suppression? No.

Shawn   January 21st, 2008 9:45 am ET

OH WOW! Poor Obama. He keeps on whining like the little kid in high school who doesn't win the student council election! Grow up, Mr. Obama! You have sent Oprah and a bunch of other high-profile surrogates out there for your campaign in an attempt to sway voters–and now that it isn't working, you're crying foul about the Clintons? What about all those high-powered endorsements, especially the one from Sen. Kerry? You've got all these people on your side that have endorsed you and spoken out in support of your campaign and against other candidates'... what ever will you do? How are you going to handle North Korea or Iran when their leaders thumb their nose at you or their political counterparts here in the US start spouting off their support for ideas different than your own? Are you going to go on television and ask your campaign manager to whine to the American people on your behalf?

This is why we need someone with experience, folks. Hillary or Edwards all the way. Experience we can count on to get this country back on track.

Sam   January 21st, 2008 9:44 am ET

Clintons are ready to do whatever it takes to win this – it is obvious they are uncompromising. This tactic of trying to drag Obama into the gutter is targeted at tiring people from the whole process. Obama's major support is coming from people inspired by his message of change and Clinton's are trying to distor this message/his image by trying to draw him into a slinging mud contest by constantly swift-boating him.

What Bill Clinton is doing is deplorable.

Mike D   January 21st, 2008 9:44 am ET

Lying to the American people, it's a Clinton family tradition. Impeach Hillary '08

Joan, New York, NY   January 21st, 2008 9:44 am ET

THE CLINTONS AIN"T GOT NO CLASS. NEVER HAVE. NEVER WILL.

Jim   January 21st, 2008 9:43 am ET

I have not seen CNN do a fact check yet on Bill Clinton's remarks yet. I hope and wish they would right away. This would put this to rest as for what I have heard and researched he has said nothing that is distorted. Need to check your facts before accusing of distortion.

Are you kidding, both Edward's and Obama's wives have come out very negative especially towards Hillary. If that is not "Bad" cop then I do not know what is.

It would be great if everybody was above the fray but that just is not going to happen.

Stop whinning Obama knew he would have to contend with Bill as well as Hillary. If he can not take the heat now then he will never be electable in November

The Observer   January 21st, 2008 9:43 am ET

Obama is increasingly looking like a whiner.

If he thinks it is bad now then god help him if he has to face the full force of the GOPs mud-slinging.

Julie   January 21st, 2008 9:43 am ET

I think it's sexist for Obama to imply that he's fighting Bill too. This is Hillary's campaign. Bill was a great President, but he's not running for the office now, she is. What, he can't win against Hillary so now he is attacking Bill? That just shows how strong she is. :)

Further, if he thinks fighting two predominent Democrats is hard, I would love to see how he is going to attack the entire Republican party.

Steven   January 21st, 2008 9:43 am ET

Big deal. Hillary is up against Obama and Oprah.

DJ, Philadelphia   January 21st, 2008 9:43 am ET

Oh please, Obama slams former president Clinton with his Reagan commentary. HA! His camp can't handle the defeat in Nevada and didn't have the decency to address those who supported him there. Instead, he runs home.

Spanieluvr   January 21st, 2008 9:42 am ET

I always hear the "good cop-bad cop" approach being slammed....but doesn't it work well? That's why it's used so often, including by Obama himself....MLK-sounding peacemaker one day, opponent-basher the next. Life itself plays good cop-bad cop by giving us hard lessons as well as happy rewards. Obama needs to stop whining like a spoiled child and take his blows along with the ones he deals out just as vigorously. If he can't take the punches, he should get out of the ring. If he becomes President, our enemies and problems aren't going to back down as a result of his complaining that they're not being fair by letting him win and look good....so he should start practicing right now....unless he's not interested in the realities that lie ahead and all around him....only the vague hopes he's conjuring up in the present, that are already beginning to crumble under the weight of how things actually work in this world.

Maggie, FT Lauderdale   January 21st, 2008 9:42 am ET

Poor Baby!!! As the days pass you show your weaknesses, you and only you have lost this race for yourself. Hillary 08!!!

The Observer   January 21st, 2008 9:41 am ET

Obama increasingly comes across as a whiner – if he thinks it is bad now then god help him if he were the democratic candidate up against the full force of the mud-slinging GOP machine.

B.B.   January 21st, 2008 9:41 am ET

If you can't take the heat B.O. GET OUT OF THE KITCHEN!

TINA ny, ny   January 21st, 2008 9:40 am ET

Bill is doing is this because Media is giving Obama free ride. Someone has to bring truth out.

Jake   January 21st, 2008 9:39 am ET

What substance does Hillary provide? What experience does First Lady really give her? Do you want Laura Bush running for President nine years from now?

Leo   January 21st, 2008 9:39 am ET

Looks like a 3rd term for Bill Clinton. The same happened in Argentina where they ellected the wife of a former president.

Hillary and Bill are doing a great job in making people believe that Hillary is so much more experienced than Obama and that experience is fundamental in this unique job. Any of the candidates has experience, none of them is coming fresh from high school or college.

Heck, if experience is so important, why not strip the 2 terms limit? That would make Bill happy!

Grizzly   January 21st, 2008 9:38 am ET

Is our candidate for hope and change whining? Obama, please...

I agree with Wayne, this is kid's stuff compared to what the RNC is going to throw at the democratic candidate later this year. Just as Obama has questioned Hillary's vote to support the war in 2003, Hillary's camp will question statements he has made about the war over the years.

If he really wants to make a difference, then he needs to keep his message positive, and please someone start talking about policies and ways to improve our country. While "Hope" is wonderful, it is not a strategy. Do we really want 4 more years of no strategy and a reactive government?

Dave   January 21st, 2008 9:38 am ET

Michelle Obama has more class in her little finger than Bill has in his entire body.

MAR   January 21st, 2008 9:38 am ET

I had supported Hillary Clinton in the past but what I now see is a woman who is demonstrating she is not a strong leader. I raised my children as a single parent with support from family and friends but it was I who lead the "battle" to succeed. I never thought to ask anyone to fight my battle for me. Looking over the past few months, incident after incident, Hillary has consistently had Bill fight her battles. Clearly, this will continue if she gets to the White House. No Thank You!

Doe   January 21st, 2008 9:38 am ET

January 21, 2008 9:25 am ET

2 against 1 is not fair. :)

Too much divisiveness seems to come from both Hillary and Bill. I believe Obama is the candidate that will bring the country together mor
--------------------–

How would a candidate who has his mentor and pastor Rev. Jeremiah Wright, honored Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan bring the country together?

Richard, St. Paul, MN   January 21st, 2008 9:37 am ET

Bill Clinton was a good president, but a yuck of a human being. I guess some things never change....

Desiree   January 21st, 2008 9:37 am ET

Elizabeth Edwards and Michelle Obama also campaign for their spouses and say things about the other canidates so are we going to start attacking the spouses now? If he can handle the Cintons then the republicans will bury him. He's not vetted yet, he will crumble to the republicans if what Bill Clinton says gets him all rattled the republicans will pul out everything and won't care. Even though some people don't like Bill Clinton he still has a huge following and if Obama starts attacking someone who's not running in this election like Bill Clinton he may separate the democrated party.

Rex, Houghton, MI   January 21st, 2008 9:36 am ET

When we hear Bill Clinton talk about Obama and Obama retort that Clinton is not telling the truth we HAVE TO REMEMBER that Clinton was impeached because he lied to America.

If someone has lied to you once there is no reason to believe they can ever be trusted to tell the truth.

stefanowitsch   January 21st, 2008 9:36 am ET

Please send the Clintons into retirement, Barack. I really liked Bill Clinton's intelligence (especially in contrast to the dullness of the Bush years) but I lost all respect for him in recent month and Hillary only says what makes her look good at that very moment. They might be "smart" enough to win one more election but both are sellouts and literally running on their last drop of credibility.

Dave   January 21st, 2008 9:35 am ET

There is a reason why we only let President's serve for 2 terms – because this isn't a monarchy or a dictatorship. Bill Clinton wants a third term and he, along with Hillary, will do or say anything to get back in the White House.

Don   January 21st, 2008 9:35 am ET

For Christ's sake – Obama whining and crying again. I see Obama uses his wife in his campaign but it's unfair to use Bill just because he's a former President??? All campaigns use their assets to their advantage and I can't think of a stronger asset than Bill Clinton. And I hardly think the Clinton's are playing "free and reckless" anymore so than the Obama campaign. I mean come on their were witnessed accounts of Obama's campaign using intimidation tactics in Nevada. Obama can convince some he is as "pure as the driven snow" but he's a politician through and through just the same as Hillary. IF OBAMA CAN'T STAND THE HEAT (YET AGAIN) GET OUT OF THE KITCHEN.

chrls enoch   January 21st, 2008 9:35 am ET

i wondering..is bill doing this for himself or for hillary..either way if she gets it..i'm voting for a republican canidate.....tired of our kids getting messed with on the hill..go away bill and let your wife speak for herself..she's a strong enough..i guess

JMS   January 21st, 2008 9:34 am ET

The facts are the facts, and I agree if Obama can't take the heat now how does he expect to handle himself against the republican onslaught in the genearl election. Hillary has proven time and time again that she can handle it and has handled it. May the best man or woman win.

marie   January 21st, 2008 9:34 am ET

Just heard on Fox that a poll revealed that when women were asked would they rather be fat and rich or would they rather have Jennifer Aniston’s body – they chose fat and rich. Proof once more – it’s the economy.

Seriously, I don’t believe Obama for one minute didn’t realize that he would be up against both Clintons, anymore than he didn’t know how to play the “interview question game” – which requires making a negative a positive. But making these statements gains him some sympathy without having to shed a tear.

He’s a very smart man – just like both the Clintons. No one has to look too far to see how “unbecoming” it is to have to run for any public office. It’s not all the candidates fault either for this situation. We force the candidates to pitch to us in sound bites, give us a great slogan, quote, theme song.

However, Bill in my opinion, is doing nothing wrong here. What in the world is wrong with campaigning for your wife? And why are some asking, “Well if Bill is so influential during the campaign, what would be his influence in the White House if she is elected?.” If we are to be fair here, then why aren’t we demanding to know what influence would all the other candidates wives have on their husband’s presidency if elected? Think about this a minute. Could it be that even if Bill hadn’t been president, just the fact that he is a man is deemed more influential and threatening than a female spouse?

I think many people had a problem with Hillary as First Lady because she didn’t fit the “mold” they were comfortable with. She fought for National Healthcare way before it was cool to. Now Bill doesn’t fit the “mold” of spouse to the presidential candidate. I think this couple is all about change – change for the better.

KELLI2L   January 21st, 2008 9:34 am ET

Get used to it Obama. All spouses running for the Presidency, including yours, has a right and even a duty to stump for their other half.
And because Bill is an ex-president he knows what he's talking about; so please stop whining!

Amy in Cincinnati   January 21st, 2008 9:33 am ET

I think it's hilarious that the minute Obama stands up for himself, and calls Bill Clinton out on the carpet, people are calling him a crybaby. LOL! The Clintons are toxic, as anyone who is really being objective can see. Obama is just stating an obvious fact that it's not the Hillary and Bill tag team in '08.

Here's the thing…the moderate Republicans and Independants will not vote for Hillary in the general election, especially if McCain is the nominee for the GOP. In fact, if McCain is the nominee, many life long democrats will consider McCain over Hillary. Do the math. She's not gonna make it in the long run.

Check out the head to head polls between Democrats and Republicans on RealClearPolitics.com. Obama blows Hillary out of the water in every matchup. America, it is up to us. Let's not blow it for another 8 years.

Go Obama!

Ashok Nanda   January 21st, 2008 9:32 am ET

We knew Bill Clinton never demonstrated any ethics when he was in white house but the way he is participating in Hillary's campaign is PATHETIC. We expect ex-Presidents to be Statesmen

I was planning to Vote for Hillary but now I have changed my mind because with her we will again have Bill……. Sorry Hillary

Seth   January 21st, 2008 9:32 am ET

I think Edwards and Obama are in race against two Clintons . This is rather unfortunate moment in Politics. I would say Clintons are running dictatorship in democratic party. When the Nevada caucus debate was going on, Bill Clinton was in LA at the same time speaking to group of people. Clintons can be in two locations at same time.But Obama and Edwards cannot do that.How can anyone compete against them in fair and justified manner?By the way speaking of experience , someone in this forum has to check their brain when they say that Hillary has 35 years of experience.

Doe   January 21st, 2008 9:32 am ET

Somebody had to expose Obamas flip flops and am glad Bill Clinton is doing it.

Bill   January 21st, 2008 9:32 am ET

Wahhhhhhhhh Wahhhhhhhh

Come on, if he thinks this is too much he is way over his head then. It’s only going to get worse and if he does magically get the Dem nod, the Republicans will rip him apart with things a lot worse

d.a.   January 21st, 2008 9:29 am ET

B.O. record on the war is what Bills says it was and is. B.O. claims he would have probably, maybe, not for sure, might have or not vote for the war. That is a nice seat to be sitting in when you weren't even in congress. Hinesight is 20/20 as they all say. But now he says he is against the war , always was. I will respect him for that. So, since he has been in the senate, he has voted for everything asked of him to continue the war.. Don't start making noise about having to support the troops.. What a better way of supporting the fact he is against the war by not funding it, by saying he will not pay one more dime for it, which if everyone did this would mean our troops would be sent home. B.O. is not going to win the nomination on record or experience, he will win it if everyone believes in the HOPES that he has for America, and I need a lot more substance than just hope. We need Hillary, and thank you Bill for keeping the truth coming out. The media doesn't seem to want to do it, and trust me the republicans want B.O. to win so they can rip him a new one.

JB   January 21st, 2008 9:29 am ET

Doesn't Obama understand that "being up against both Clintons" is a great reason to vote for Hillary. Their team, Hillary as President and Bill as a capable advisor, makes an extremely strong force leading our country. Everyone will feel the same way – foreign governments, congress, etc...

If Obama can't handle it, how will he handle the role of president?

toni   January 21st, 2008 9:29 am ET

Stop whing Obama! This proves you are not strong enough to be elected president . We need someone tough, not someone who's going to whine at the slightest provocation.

BNS   January 21st, 2008 9:28 am ET

"And Axelrod vows Obama will continue to hit back...."

I'm scared!

Jim in Orlando, FL   January 21st, 2008 9:27 am ET

Bill Clinton lie? Tell a half-truth ? Naaaaaaah ... Couldn't happen ....

Barbara Chauvin`   January 21st, 2008 9:26 am ET

And the Clintons are up against both Obamas.

Obama needs to stop the whining. Bill is doing no different than what a spouse is supposed to do. What? Does Obama expect Bill to act like one of the girls?

Kat   January 21st, 2008 9:26 am ET

Lol oh yes President Clinton is a huge assest. First it would be former President Clinton... I would expect someone campaigning on behalf of HRC to know the difference. Why not tell the American people what you intend to do for this country rather than sling mud like 3rd graders... Sad...

Bo   January 21st, 2008 9:25 am ET

2 against 1 is not fair. :)

Too much divisiveness seems to come from both Hillary and Bill. I believe Obama is the candidate that will bring the country together more.

Jen, Gainesville, FL   January 21st, 2008 9:24 am ET

Obama is right. Anyone with a head on his/her shoulders can see the Clintons' good cop/bad cop strategy. In fact, some prominent democratic leaders have phoned Bill to refrain himself (please see the Newsweek article).

A young, brave Obama is running for president against two Clintons combined. He has maintained to run a positive, up-lifting campaign even though the Clintons have been consistently running negative and smear campaign after Iowa.

So far, Obama has won the Iowa pledged delegates by 1, tied the NH delegates, and won the Nevada delegates by 1 against the powerful Clinton machine ran by a former president and a former First Lady.

If Obama loses to the Clintons, the democrats can not win in November. The country is sick of division, playing political favor, and scoring political points without good judgment, leadership, and inspiring and unifying ability to solve real issues.

Ashok Nanda   January 21st, 2008 9:24 am ET

We knew Bill Clinton never demonstrated any ethics when he was in white house but the way he is participating in Hillary's campaign is PATHETIC. We expect ex-Presidents to be statesmen but Bill is a shameless HUMAN being. He is a disgrace to US and to Human Race.

I was planning to Vote for Hillary but now I have changed my mind because with her we will again have Bill....... Sorry Hillary

Glazed, Detroit metro   January 21st, 2008 9:24 am ET

This gentleman spends most of his time complaining. As president, is his habit going to continue? If all one has is complain, he should become a new-reporter! For the past 8 years, the only contribution from reporters for not doing their job is complain. The admin is not forthcoming; We were lied to; We were feed this information; The congress also believed the admin; etc.

The next admin. is going to have one of the most difficult task. The domistic and external problems that have been created and/or swept under are big and will require a great (not good, not leader). He/She must take care of all things.

If the only thing Mr Obama wants is the seat of the president and at all cost to the people of this country, shame on him. Sorry, not him, shame on us for falling for this trick again.

Tom Davie   January 21st, 2008 9:23 am ET

Senator Obama knew right from the beginning who Hillary's husband was. The media is going to seek him whereever he goes, like any other president.

These are really 'softball' issues. The facts are that Senator Obama is a democrat, and the Clintons arent going to rough him up very badly. They have to endorse him if he wins.

The real problem is that if Senator Obama is having problems with these silly issues, how will his 'glass jaw' react to some REAL HARDBALL when the Republicans attack him if he wins the Democratic nomination. They already have him for the Reagan flap.

And how will he react when the Senate, and congress disagree with him. Will he have a fit ?

What if foreign leaders attact him ? What about Russia or China? Most of all, if he cannot take the pressue at this low level, how can he ever deal with Al Queda or other negotiations if things dont go his way.

He needs to grow up a bit. Bill can say whatever he wants. Obama needs to get on with his campaign rather than sidetrack himself because someone 'upsets his applecart' .

Sab   January 21st, 2008 9:23 am ET

Bill CLinton is dishonest american citizen

B.F. Pinkerton   January 21st, 2008 9:23 am ET

Frankly, I've lost all respect for Bill Clinton. His actions over the last few weeks have been deplorable, proving that he and Hillary will do anything to win. And by anything, I mean lie. We've seen it before, 10 years ago. Whether it's interns or on the campaign trail, these two can't be trusted.

Summerville   January 21st, 2008 9:22 am ET

After the assassination of Bhutto, Obama very clearly insinuated that Hillary's vote on Iraq was somehow responsible for what had happened in Pakistan. Funny how now, he's claiming somebody is distorting HIS record and/or it's consequences.

There seems to be no problem with anybody slinging whatever at Hillary, but when Obama gets some of it, people gasp and wonder how anyone could be so mean, and how they'll say "anything" to get elected. Is there an echo in the house, Senator Obama?

Robert Bell   January 21st, 2008 9:22 am ET

Bill Clinton is playing fast and loose with the facts?

That depend on what your definition of "is" is.

Right?

How about a change?

Vote Democrat   January 21st, 2008 9:22 am ET

Both sides need to realise quick that this constant bickering damages the democrat cause – in particular those independents that we need to win to have a chance of the presidency.

A bit more positive from all sides please!!!

Suspicious   January 21st, 2008 9:22 am ET

CNN – I challenge you to go back and examine your political titles in the last two months. You have the name "Obama" in more headlines than anyone else. This man is not leading in national polls and he has not won the majority of states. Your bias is obvious. When a poll came out recently and Clinton was ahead, your title said, "Obama Gains". Your comentators, instead of dwelling on what Clinton did right to win Nevada, spent their time giving Obama advice on what he needs to do to win. Is he paying you? Is your network uncomfortable with supporting a female candidate for President? Is your network uninterested in covering a woman that you may feel has already been discussed enough? Do you think Obama will bring better ratings? I'm suspicious and no longer turning to you for the fair reporting I used to expect.

Awaiting Moderation, USA   January 21st, 2008 9:20 am ET

I would like to know if Hillary supports what Bill is doing or if she doesn't but has no control over what Bill says.

Either scenario doesn't bode will for Hillary's campaign, in my opinion. Either she agrees with his tactics of finger wagging and distorting the facts, or she has no control over him whatsoever.

How is this going to look down the road if it continues in every state? Does she need her husband to do her dirty work for her? Can't she do it alone? You don't see any other spouses playing "bad cop."

I think it's becoming unfitting of a former president to take on this role in the campaign. The thing is, Bill will keep doing it at all costs.

I have decided to support Barack Obama, but also said that I will support whoever the Democratic nominee is. But, this is leaving a real bad taste in my mouth for Hillary. And, it's a shame that the bad taste isn't coming from her, but her husband.

David. B   January 21st, 2008 9:19 am ET

The same thing can be said about Obama & Oprah.Hillary is running against Obama and Oprah. Each side has big names supporting them and making accusations. Why is anyone suprised? It always happens, let me decide what is true or not. Im not going to blindly believe anyone from either side.

JUDE CT   January 21st, 2008 9:19 am ET

If anything comes out of these process, it will be Barack Obama taking on two political giants at the same time. The Clintons are the finest political gurus out there and I can't wait to see how this would all ball down. Barack is a movement by himself. He's only got God and the American people fighting for him. May the best candidate win.

Wayne   January 21st, 2008 9:18 am ET

The Clintons have been handling Obama with kid gloves. If he can't handle the heat now, how does he expect to stand up to the Republicans in the general election? Does he think the Republicans are going join hands and have a sing-a-long? I'm voting for Hillary, because she has the experience, and She and Bill know how to win against the RightWingers, Obama doesn't.

tonilynn   January 21st, 2008 9:17 am ET

oh poor Obama! What will he do when if world leaders come up against him at the same time? Whine?
I guess he didn't realize he was playing in the big leagues now.
He should stop whining, and tell the voters what his plans for the country are.

Christine Atlanta, Ga.   January 21st, 2008 9:16 am ET

Michelle Obama is also out shooting her mouth off. Why not give that some press?

Samantha Klein   January 21st, 2008 9:16 am ET

Obama is running for President. Maybe he needs to learn how to play with the big boys. Whining isn't the way.

Nalla   January 21st, 2008 9:15 am ET

This shows what type of establishment politics Obama has to overcome. Without Bill's last name, Hillary amouns to nothing. 8 years as first lady and more as the first lady of a governor and before that as an attorney in a law firm.....

Give Obama a fair credit to the kind of grass roots movement he has started from sratch.....there was no big name pulling him through or providing him with the support network that Hillary can tap into.

I am for hope and challenges and I support Obama....forever

Intelligent for Obama

NYC Democrat   January 21st, 2008 9:13 am ET

I used to respect the Clintons but no more. President Clinton has abused the dignity of his former office by campaigning so divisively and dishonestly on behalf of his wife. Any argument that President Clinton's views are unbiased or uninterested is a fairy tail.

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room. Download this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

twitter
@wolfblitzercnn: It wasn't long ago when 700,000 jobs were lost in one month. Last month - 11,000 jobs lost. Mark Zandi comes into SitRoom today to assess.
Updated: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 09:51:49 -0800
@wolfblitzercnn: Thebest-selling author Greg Mortenson is coming into SitRoom today to assess Obama's new Afghan strategy. He really knows Afghanistan.
Updated: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 09:21:51 -0800
@psteinhauserCNN: New CNN Poll: Americans back Afghan troop increase but Obama's approval now under 50 percent for the first time - http://bit.ly/8Is9xA
Updated: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 09:19:50 -0800
@edhenrycnn: Joe Klein of Time mag joining me on "44" at cnn.com 18772664189 right now
Updated: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 08:05:09 -0800
@psteinhauserCNN: Two very different takes on the November jobs report - http://bit.ly/6SDZHO
Updated: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 07:18:30 -0800
Categories