January 21, 2008
Posted: 01:15 PM ET
Obama is striking back at Bill Clinton
Obama is striking back at Bill Clinton

MYRTLE BEACH, South Carolina (CNN) – More tit-for-tat on the campaign trail – only this time, it’s between Barack Obama and Bill Clinton.

After losing the caucus tally in Nevada, the Obama campaign took aim at Bill Clinton and the comments he made during his many campaign stops in that state on behalf of his wife, Hillary Clinton.

Now the Illinois senator himself is taking on the former president, telling Good Morning America that he feels as if he’s running against both Clintons.

In the interview, Obama said that the former president has been misrepresenting both “my record of opposition to the war in Iraq” and “our approach to organizing in Las Vegas,” as the controversy over Saturday’s Nevada caucus vote continues to grow.

Obama campaign senior adviser David Axelrod did not back away from the remarks after they became public Sunday night, telling CNN the Clintons “have a good cop, bad cop thing going” in which “he comes with a negative message she stays positive.”

Axelrod accuses the former President of “doing slash and burn stuff,” and slams the Clinton campaign, saying “there’s a philosophy of saying and doing anything it takes.”

“It’s very clear that Bill Clinton is playing fast and loose with the facts,” says Axelrod, and unbecoming of a former president: “It’s been a little crass, as someone who supported him and respects him, I think it’s disappointing.”

And Axelrod vows Obama will continue to hit back. “As long as he’s out there, we aren’t going to let him distort the record,” he says. “We’ll aggressively challenge him when he misrepresents the facts.”
More…

He also calls on the former president to stop distorting Obama's record. “If he wants to help his wife, just be honest — don’t parse words, don’t truncate quotes to make your case.”

The ABC interview with Obama has yet to air, but the Clinton camp is already fighting back.

“We understand Sen. Obama is frustrated by his loss in Nevada, but the facts are the facts,” said campaign spokesperson Phil Singer. “President Clinton is a huge asset to our campaign and will continue talking to the American people.”

The new brawl comes as the battle between the two camps over the Nevada vote shows no signs of abating, with both sides accusing the other of voter intimidation.

On Sunday, Obama’s Nevada State Director David Cohen said there had been a “clear-cut disenfranchising” of voters in the state because of actions by Clinton supporters, and the campaign's general counsel, Bob Bauer, said they were asking the state and national party to investigate.

Clinton spokesman Howard Wolfson called the allegations “absurd” and “laughable,” and spokesman Phil Singer responded charged that “Sen. Obama’s allies in Nevada engaged in strong arm tactics and intimidation against our supporters.”

Singer also repeated former President Clinton’s charge that the senator’s record on the war had been “inconsistent.”

–CNN's Jessica Yellin

Filed under: Barack Obama • Hillary Clinton


vicky smart   January 25th, 2008 1:17 pm ET

Sen. Obama should stop replying the Clintons, and tell the country his plan.
They (the Clintons and the Press) are using this method to distract your goal.
Be focus and ignore them quickly.

C.S. Dachet   January 25th, 2008 6:16 am ET

Well, I think all hope is not lost for Obama. Every obstacle could be an opportunity for a miracle. Obama could use this heated attack to prove his maturity and make an impact. An eye for an eye may not always play out well. Where there is hatred bring love, where there is strive bring calm. Obama's posture in this can serve him both good and bad. The Clinton are bomarding Obama to get him frustrated and distablized. It is a strategy to bring out the worst in him.

SJM   January 24th, 2008 6:39 pm ET

The MAJOR DIFFERENCE between what Bill and Hillary are doing, and Barak and Michelle are doing is this:

ANY TIME MO makes a derogatory statement, it is attributed to Barack.

Whereas Hillary Clinton is attempting to play innocent. Notice in the debate, when Obama responded to one of Bill's attacks upon him, she stated, "He's not here" "I didn't say that"– BULL! She is as responsible for Bill's role in the campaign as Barack is for Michelle's– and it's repulsive to me that she's being such a hypocrite.

I was actually sympathetic towards her, too– now I see why so many people despise Hillary Clinton.

(Still would probably vote for her over a Repub, though)

Gilbert   January 23rd, 2008 2:39 pm ET

Keep up the hope and fight on Barack! You surely are competing against a former
President and a First Lady. If you prevail it will be like winning against an incumbent; if you lose it will be because you are fighting against two odds.
As for the Clintons its clear they are trying to go round the constitution and get back to the White House for another term. Otherwise what's so important for them that they want to achieve that they could not do in the eight years they were in the White House? I think the Clintons' agenda to go back to The White House is personal and not for America's sake. They must be anxious to repair the damages caused by Bill's escapades in the corridors of the White House among other things. This whole thing is just too personal for Clintons!

PATTY   January 22nd, 2008 12:38 pm ET

CNN DEMOCRATS ALL THE WAY-OBAMA IS YOUR MAN! I WILL NEVER WATCH CNN AGAIN! WHAT A BRUNCH OF CRAT!

Lauren   January 22nd, 2008 11:12 am ET

with everything that is going on in the world i don't think time need to be spent on who did what and when. tell me what you intend to do to bring us out of this mess we are in in iraq, the economy, social security and health care. after the debate last night any respect i had for hillery clinton was lost. it seems like as soon as she starts slipping in the poles she starts attacking obama. hillery please talk about what you intend to do when you become president. let your husband leave the campaign trail and go charm the women.

Another VA Independent   January 22nd, 2008 10:29 am ET

WAY TO GO BILL!!! Why didn't you just cut to the chase, go on CNN and say "Don't vote for my wife because she can't possibly do the job by herself!" Seriously, what a way to undermine your wife…I bet she never saw that coming too. You just couldn't stay out of the light could you? It's almost like watch reality show with celebrities in rehab. I would think anyone with half a brain would wake up and finally realize that is is exactly why Hillary Clinton was always the worst possible presidential candidate because of one simple fact - WAY TOO MUCH BAGGAGE!!!!!

Yep, we Americans do have the shortest memories in the world. Do you know how many old republicans will come out of the woodwork just to vote against her? And another note…do we really want her as President with the full understanding (and they've both made it perfectly clear) that she's going to depend on the advice from a man who continuously lied to her before, AND THE COUNTRY? Yeah, so he's not the first Prez to get caught with his pants down. At least they weren't stupid enought to go on national television and lie about it. Oh, and if you're going to constantly lie as world leader, at least let it be for a good reason like assasination, arms deals, you know, important crap it!!!!

Oh yeah, and let's not forget about the Republicans. I'm sure they just couldn't wait for this insanity to start. They knew it was coming/ I bet right now, they're probably all holding hands, jumping up and down, skipping around in circles. With a little patience, they can simply step back and wait for the Clinton's do what they've always done — self destruct.

So Bill, YOU'RE NOT RUNNING — LET IT GO! And Hillary, if you REALLY want to be taken seriously and get your shot at the "big chair", get your husband in check and fight your own battles. Then again, maybe this IS the only way you have a chance of winning against the "Boys".

Elias   January 22nd, 2008 6:58 am ET

why are Hillary and Bill Clinton deliberatly attacking Obama? This Shows they have no confidence on themselves. At least Obama knows the Americans national anthem. Hillary, before critisizing someone like Obama, first you have to know the national anthem! ha ha ha!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ed   January 22nd, 2008 6:34 am ET

go hillary

Skip   January 22nd, 2008 5:51 am ET

Of course Obama did not suspect he would be running against two Clintons because he made the reasonable assumption that President Clinton would respect the decorum and dignity of the Presidency at least to the extent that Bush senior did in 2000 when junior ran. His mistake was that he underestimated the depravity of the Clintons. I supported Bill Clinton in 92′ and 96′ but have been utterly appalled at the gutter campaign the Clintons have waged against Barack Obama.

dandubya   January 22nd, 2008 2:22 am ET

boo hoo hoo, poor Obama is being picked on. It would be nice if we were in a world where politics didn't center around not your own merits so much, but on the faults of your opponents. Don't throw the mud if you can't stand getting dirty senator.

Matt   January 22nd, 2008 1:11 am ET

Why does CNN delete your posts if you mention that Hillary got elected because her husband pardoned criminals for votes in a state she did not even live in. Can't handle the truth or do you secretly still love her and the Clintons?

The only thing scarier than the Clintons lies, scandels and dirty deeds is the fact that they still have so called media outlets in their back pocket.

Don't be fooled this is still the Clinton News Network.

Ryk   January 22nd, 2008 1:08 am ET

Jessica said that "Hillary is the strongest, most-accomplished, intelligent woman in the Democratic Party. " Sadly I couldn't agree more.
Not great praise for Democrat women.

anti obama   January 21st, 2008 11:58 pm ET

NEVER OBama…only hillary or STAY AT HOME IN NOV….

stamp7   January 21st, 2008 11:24 pm ET

When Senator Clinton was referring to "us" and "we" during the debate, was she referring to the former president and her? If so, wasn't it interesting that she distanced herself from him in responding to Senator Obama's reference to the former president's distortion of Obama's remarks about Reagan? Does she get to play both sides of the game?

visual9   January 21st, 2008 11:05 pm ET

I would be pleased if Hillary becomes president because she is first female-president.
And also I would be pleased if Obama becomes president because he is first African-American president.
And I also pleased if one becomes president because she is first African-American female president.
and Hyspenic, Asian….

So.. please just win the Democrats!

Dean   January 21st, 2008 11:04 pm ET

So Senator Obama doesn't know who he is running against. Perhaps this man who many say is a gifted orator should keep in mind the words of a fellow Democrat, one who had great gifts with the spoken word and a deep well of strength to help him wage the battles necessary to effect real change. Those words were "I do not run for the Presidency merely to oppose any man but to propose new policies. I run because I am convinced that this country is on a perilous course and because I have such strong feelings about what must be done, and I feel that I'm obliged to do all I can." That candidate was Robert F. Kennedy.

Senator Obama, you are no Robert F Kennedy. He would never characterize President Reagan as "transformative" and leave listeners to believe it was a favorable characterization. Reagan was diametrically opposed to everything, everything, RFK stood for, worked for, and died fighting for!

Transformative!! At the end of 1980 the cumulative National Debt stood at $930,210,000,000 (that's billion with a "b"). When he left office it stood at $2,684,392,000,000. In Short, in eight years, Reagan nearly tripled a debt it took over 200 years to accumulate, pushing it up to $2,684,392,000,000. That 2.7 trillion! This after running a campaign that said we could cut taxes, increase spending on the military, AND BALANCE THE BUDGET. Man, that's transformation! No, a better characterization would be a BIG, FAT, LIE.

If Senator Obama isn't even willing to take on the myth of Republicant fiscal responsibility, to take on the lodestar of Republicant fiscal irresponsibility, namely, Ronald Reagan, then what is he willing to stand up and fight for?

Senator Obama, it is one thing to reach across the aisle to, it's another to seep their transgressions under the rug and help perpetuate one of the worst lies in American history. That lie is that Republicants are fiscally responsible.

Hillaryinthehouse   January 21st, 2008 10:55 pm ET

I am a black female

I am obligated to the oval office to place the best person in the white house, not the black person, white person. latino person, female person, or male person.

Hillary is my chose.

Some democrate and independent voters made a big mistake voting for GWB in 2000 believing in the 'change' 'family value' and 'likable' slogan, i bet they reget their vote.

GWB turn into a monster.

Democrate and independent voters allow theyself to be side tracked by Bush and Carl Rove to punish Al Gore for Clinton Sins.

Now everybody to complaine about the BUSH CLINTON DYNASTY, people you had the chance to end the dynasty in 2000, don't punish Hillary for your mistake.

kay   January 21st, 2008 10:40 pm ET

Obama isn't whining. He has to answer the Clintons lies. The country is on to them by now. Bill is a discrase. Even the dem. elites such as Kennedy and Kerry are for Obama.
The repubs want Hillary. They can sure run against her.
Hillary wants Edwards to stay in to take votes from Obama.

Aaron Thomas   January 21st, 2008 10:34 pm ET

My comment is that our four fathers( who were human),wrote the political process to elect ONE president to run this country ,Why are we so complacent and won't rewrite that process,(We are Human) Have a group of people to run this country. This country is made up of many races and two genders. This is a great chance to have them all.
P.S. I like them all ,They all have great points. Why do I have to choose ONE?

I Like the number 5.

DEWITT   January 21st, 2008 10:31 pm ET

Jack,

Why are you annoyed by my comment? Don't you see any thruth to it? We are a society of 300, 000, 000. Does someone need to be a family of Bush or Clinton to be a president?

I will never vote for the Clintons if "they" become the nominee. I will go vote for any republican candidate. That is what I will do.

However, Obama will be the nominee and we will see a big CHANGE in our country. We will have a fresh start and get our dignity back in the face the world.

______________________________________________
Jack ny, ny January 21, 2008 7:42 pm ET

As long as you are awake, it is good enough. Don't worry about others.
So annoying.
______________________________________________
DEWITT January 21, 2008 7:22 pm ET

1988: Bush

1992: Clinton

1996: Clinton

2000: Bush

2004: Bush

2008: Another CLINTON?

Is that what you people want? PLEASE WAKE UP!!!!!!!

murree   January 21st, 2008 10:27 pm ET

The more I hear Sen. Clinton, the more her voice is like nails on a blackboard. I'm willing to live with that. What I'm unwilling to live with is her duplicity and arrogance. Although a lifelong liberal, I'll not be voting for her regardless of who her opponent might be. To my way of thinking, she's an ideologue in the same mold as President Bush, albeit on another part of the political spectrum. We don't need another ideologue but a mature adult with a willingness to adjust to circumstance. While undecided on the other major democrat party candidates, I'll not vote for an true believer.

oldwhiteman   January 21st, 2008 10:26 pm ET

Okay America ,let me be the one to give you the scope on the healthcare bill.If you are so concerned.I live in Massachettes ,We have universal healthcare which is mandated.Majority of the citizens here be it white or black can't afford it .So guess what we get penalized at the end of the year through taxes if you do not have health ins.Truth be told it all sounds good when you say universal healthcare but at the end not everyone can afford it.I am a white indie but I would like to see Obama win the elections then I at least I can leave this earth knowing we are moving forward Instead of stuck at one place.The man is half white.My grandkids are half and I would like to leave this earth knowing someone like Obama can bring us all together .The Clintons have been in public for too long ,We will never know who they are working with or what their tru intentions are for running so vigorously .Lets get a fresh face n a new outlook on our government and maybe this will truly be a change.

SAM   January 21st, 2008 10:25 pm ET

Obama is the clear willer in tonights debate.

The Clinton campaign is built to divide and detour and conquer, with personal attack, innuendos and untruths, rather than debating the issues and differences and advantages that may exist. What really bothers me is that the Clintons don't seem to care that their tactics are divisive and detrimental to race relations, well so much for the Clinton’s love of America, race relations and unity, they have proven themselves to be dividers, and the debris of this lands this month during the celebration of Martin Luther Kings Birthday celebration and amidst the pictures on TV of white supremacist walking around in Jena Louisiana with lynches in their hands, yes this day over 40 years from the Civil Right movement, January 21, 2008.

Hillary has voted wrong on the war and several different bills, Bill Clinton brought us NAFTA, which has caused Americans millions of jobs and is threatening to destroy the middle class. Obama is ready, he has the foresight and knows how to make the right choices for America, Obama is a uniter and can successfully negotiate across aisles, boarders and oceans of the world, Obama is the one.

Rhonda   January 21st, 2008 10:25 pm ET

Obama was right on target. Obama is not running against Bill. The press is giving Bill so much attention, when they do that they need to preference every thing he says with a fact check monitor, just to keep them honest. I personally have been turned off with Bill and trully believe that Bill is expecting to one the White house, not Hillary. It's ashame that we can elect another president for another by coming in thrugh the back door, and putting his wife out there as the candidate, when it is clear that Bill is the candidate.

Judith   January 21st, 2008 10:24 pm ET

I am sickened by the back-and-forth between Clinton and Obama–I fear that they each will alienate the other's supporters so badly that Democrats will be unable to pull back together once the presidential candidate has been chosen. Winning the election will depend upon having all the voters turn out. I want to hear policies and programs, not about who might have said what, when. The debate made me lean toward Edwards. whereas I had been deciding between Clinton and Obama until now.

Hillary   January 21st, 2008 10:24 pm ET

I am so glad she showed her true colors tonight for all to see.

Yuck.

lee   January 21st, 2008 10:22 pm ET

I am a life-long, dedicated Democrat who was a huge fan and supporter of President Clinton, but I am disgusted, angry and ashamed of his behavior in this race. As a citizen he has every right to campaign for his spouse, but as a former president he should be held to a higher standard. He should tell us why we want to vote for Hilary, not why we shouldn’t vote for the other two excellent candidates. He needs to be positive, not negative. He has turned this into a nasty, negative campaign that would make Karl Rove proud. I always felt that our party was above that but I was wrong. He is turning this into a referendum on him, and taking attention away from the crucial issues that we face today. If she is the eventual nominee, you can bet the Republicans will use him and his behavior in the campaign this fall to motivate their base.

Brandon   January 21st, 2008 10:21 pm ET

Obama is shameless. His thin record is studied and it is not holding up. Instead of defending himself and his unaccomplished experience he is crying "FAUL" becuase Bill Clinton is making it an issue. Go spend a term or two in the Senate, get some work under your belt and come back in a future election. Are Bill Clinton and Oprah equals?

matt   January 21st, 2008 10:17 pm ET

don't you dare make this the only thing that sticks from this WHOLE debate — my GOD PLEASE CNN

Enrique   January 21st, 2008 10:17 pm ET

Someone tell Bill Clinton that the Constitution does not allow him to run for a third term. Hillary doesn't seem to understand.

Dusacre   January 21st, 2008 10:07 pm ET

New Yorker, NYC

A well-educated person has more than a list of Degree. I know PhDs that are less educated than HS graduates…

Ruby   January 21st, 2008 9:49 pm ET

Senator Obama is not just a man, but a strong gentle man. He tried in every way not to go on the attack. But even the best of us can only take so much. Plus, I believe that Senator Obama should defend his record. And, if he were not the frontrunner, he would not be attacked. I find it interesting that Senator Clinton was so emotional and passionate when talking about her love for the country, but just last week when she was confronted about her family situation, her voice did not crack one time. I have long respected President Bill and Senator Hillary Clinton, but up to now, they have shown their true colors, and their colors certainly are not red, white and blue.

VA Independent   January 21st, 2008 9:31 pm ET

Seems to me that in a battle of ethics, the Clintons don't have a leg to stand on.

Hillary for Prez   January 21st, 2008 9:12 pm ET

Why do people keep commenting on Bill's affair? What does that have to do with Hillary's run for the presidency?

You don't like the Clintons because Bill lied to the public about having an affair, is that it? The only difference between Bill Clinton and the rest of the presidents in United States history is that he got caught. Stay the hell out of their bedroom and marital issues. It's none of your business.

You want to cast those stones? Go ahead and tell me why Obama has lied so much to you, his devoted "followers" about his past? Why can't the man give a straight answer about anything? Why has it been proven that Obama's "autobiography" is no more than a great work of FICTION? Why does he want to keep his life a secret from YOU, his brainwashed followers?

Demand to know who Obama is and what he stands for. Reject his speeches….as this helps, little by little, recover from the spell his brainwashing speech writers have cast on you.

Gimma Break   January 21st, 2008 9:05 pm ET

Kathy, no. That's finite for me.

Das   January 21st, 2008 9:03 pm ET

I agree with the comment re Michelle Obama. She has been out there running her mouth…only she isn't as articulate as Bill. The press hasn't said a thing about her comment "if you can't run your own house, how can you run the White House?" If Bill had said anything like that (which is a very low blow coming from a woman…is she so sure Obama is true blue) the press would make it headline news across the country…for 2 weeks or at least until Obama could win a few more states.

kathy IL   January 21st, 2008 8:57 pm ET

to 1971 guy I do not like someone telling others how to vote. I will vote and if it counts (Ihope). It will be for the right man or woman but not Hillary. The Clintons have not been playing fair.

kathy IL   January 21st, 2008 8:51 pm ET

I repeat "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" Need we say more!

Gimma Break   January 21st, 2008 8:51 pm ET

Watching the debate…Go Barack! Toughness with finesse.

kevin   January 21st, 2008 8:38 pm ET

obama will use the race factor to his advantage. just wait and watch. sad thing is obama doesn't have slave roots and do not fight for african americans. i really hope my brothers and sisters will not be blinded by the color factor; that obama is black and he is right.

Amanda Johnson   January 21st, 2008 8:19 pm ET

The man can't even say the Pledge of Allegience, let alone put his religon before the Presidency how does he expect to run a country he doesn't put first in his life? How can we count on a man that wont be putting us first. The president has to be able to be President and put things such as religon and family in 2nd that's just how it is, there's a reason for seperation of church and State.

New Yorker, NYC   January 21st, 2008 8:13 pm ET

Look at Pinnocho Obama Nose Grow.

Gimma Break   January 21st, 2008 8:07 pm ET

Has anyone noticed that Hillary has packed on a couple of pounds? When was her last medical exam?

Mike T   January 21st, 2008 8:04 pm ET

If Hillary's last name wasn't Clinton and she hadn't been married to Bill Clinton, nobody would even know who she was and nobody would care one iota what she says or thinks.

And if her husband hadn't come out and campaigned for her: first, she wouldn't be a Senator, and second, she wouldn't have won a single state in this primary. I really think that most of the people voting for her think they are voting for Bill Clinton, and do not understand that he can't be president again. They need to read the Constitution.

Clinton also gets help from the media, including CNN. Ever notice that every time there is a story about the 3 candidates, like the one on the CNN homepage right now - Hillary's picture is first, Obama's is second, and Edward's is third. Is that supposed to be subliminal, or what? Further, they always seem to choose a flattering picture of Clinton, and the worst pictures they can find of the other two. Is that not bias as well?

Dr. Ellen S. Ringer   January 21st, 2008 8:04 pm ET

This is not to be taken lightly. I have never seen dirty poltics like Bill and Hillary Clinton's tactics.

1971guy   January 21st, 2008 8:03 pm ET

ONLY CLINTON -08 or stay home in Nov dems

New Yorker, NYC   January 21st, 2008 8:00 pm ET

enomisa
I complete agree with you. I have Dual BS in EE/CE and MS in EE/CE I support Hillary Clinton with out doubt. And My that also my Well Educated Friends support Hillary Clinton.
i know for a fact the African American Community in the NYS Support Sen. Hillary Clinton.

iF Barrack Hussein Obama is such a Uniter Why did he call Senator Hillary Clinton the senator from Punjabi. I think that is a racist comment. I my self african american was pissed because he make that comment against my Indian Wife. I think Mr. Hussein Obama need some education about world. Not be a George W. Bush.
When he was running against the Republicans in Il . He was against Keyes. Any one against Mr. Keye would've won.

Gimma Break   January 21st, 2008 7:54 pm ET

Don't you love the Pundits comments that Obama has to appeal to more than blacks. How easily they forget, Obama won in Iowa. Some of these guys are truly talking out of the side their heads.

NextPresident   January 21st, 2008 7:53 pm ET

Bill Clinton was impeached and if any of you read the Article I of the constitution you would have read this:

"Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law."

But Hillary says BIll will be an Ambassador, in which he cannot. He cannot even enjoy the office of honor, nor is he to paid as an ex president for speeches. When will people read.

Don   January 21st, 2008 7:52 pm ET

Guys, do not let the media sway your opinion. Look up the issues.Study and Vote your true beliefs. The media spins and is causing so much chaos. I am from SC. This is not a racially divided state. We do not worship the Confedrate Flag. However, you would not know that from watching the news.
Today is a good example of how media spins. I was at the MLK Day at the Dome celebration. Edwards, Obama and Clinton all spoke. Clinton had a huge African American support group there, hundreds of signs and supporters. However, CNN reported and showed the footage of all three speaking. MSNBC ran the exact same footage. On CNN, we did not see the Hillary supporters, and when they showed her speak there was not sound of the cheering crowd. However, Obama and Edwards audio was left on. MSNBC showed the same footage and Clinton had as much cheering if not more. I was there, so I know our community is supporting Hillary. Was this a technical issue, or is the media trying to make it appear that Clinton has little support from the African American community. Hope my post makes it on. After the event, hundreds of people poured into the Clinton headquaters. Not reported. It was also reported that Obama was the only one to march in the march. That is true, but the news failed to report that Clinton was supposed to march, but her flight was delayed. Not her fault. However, the unbalanced reporting made it look like Obama cared more and had more supporters. From a real I-report. It was even. Only Edwards had little support here. This is the media telling part of the story and we all need to be careful of what we believe and see on TV.

Independent Voter   January 21st, 2008 7:51 pm ET

The 'Clinton' brand is like a Chinese made product.

Jack ny, ny   January 21st, 2008 7:48 pm ET

this is suppose to be someone's fault. What is going to be next?

_______________________________________________________
Ron, Bronx, NY January 21, 2008 6:20 pm ET

Anybody with a properly funtioning brain knows that Michelle Obama is no Bill Clinton. Clinton is an ex-president with an armada of political connections and to even suggest that Michelle's support for her husband comes even close to the type of influence Bill Clinton's support has for his wife is misguided.

Mike T   January 21st, 2008 7:47 pm ET

He's also running against the media, including CNN - who clearly favors Clinton. Has anybody else noticed that every time there is a story about the 3 candidates, like the one on the CNN homepage right now - Hillary's picture is first, Obama's second, and Edward's third. Further,they always seem to choose a flattering picture of Clinton, and the worst pictures they can find of the other two. Is that not clearly bias?

marji   January 21st, 2008 7:47 pm ET

I am really furious at Bill Clinton's nasty attacks on Obama and I hope it backfires on the Clintons big-time. The good cop, bad cop strategy of the Clintons is transparent and revelatory of how they are not good enough for what is needed in this country and in the world because what is needed is statespersonship, not politics as usual.

Obama conveys a sense of integrity in thought and speech that seems as unique as it is genuine. I'm nearly over my love affair with Bill which, like many things Sixties-ish, has felt so good for so long. It's all beginning to seem as adolescent as it actually is at this post-9/11, post-modernist, deconstructed moment that will not be over for a long, long time….We need something much better than Bush, Bill or Hillary.

In addition, I resent what seems to be Hillary and Bill's sense of entitlement regarding the presidency. Just because they want it so badly doesn't mean they deserve it, as they seem to think.

Jack ny, ny   January 21st, 2008 7:42 pm ET

As long as you are awake, it is good enough. Don't worry about others.
So annoying.
______________________________________________
DEWITT January 21, 2008 7:22 pm ET

1988: Bush

1992: Clinton

1996: Clinton

2000: Bush

2004: Bush

2008: Another CLINTON?

Is that what you people want? PLEASE WAKE UP!!!!!!!

prince   January 21st, 2008 7:42 pm ET

Bill and Hillary had their turn for eight years in the white house. The country was divided and highly polarized. Bill left Osama Bin Laden loose when he could have gotten him, he left almost a million African slaughtered between the Tutsi and Hutsi when he could have helped but because therer were black and worth less, he looked the other way. He went and committed US war machine to drive away Milosovich in the middle of Europe. He keep deceiving the old demogues in the Black community and unfortunately been called the first Black president. Young and educated white, Latinos and black who wants a new direction are supporting Barack. The Clintons are now waging all sorts of distortion againt the Illinois Senator. Barack is a rising start and many young Americans are looking for a unifying figure just like JFK to lead us. The Clintons are in the black churches for their vote period. I will vote for Barack if he wins the nomination. If the mudslinging continue, I will pitch my tent with Jonh Mccain. These are great Americans with decency not filandre and impeached devisive clowns.

Jessica   January 21st, 2008 7:39 pm ET

Samuel,

I support Hillary Clinton, and I would like to answer your questions.

1. The premise of your first question is incorrect. Hillary Clinton has earned the support of 174 super delegates. Barack Obama has only earned the support of 84. Super delegates are senators, governors and other prominent political leaders in the Democratic Party. Barack Obama may have won several super delegates, but he did not win more than Hillary. In fact, she's bested him two-fold. If the second part of your statement is true, that senators from southern states support Barack Obama, then I think the Democratic Party needs to consider what that means. We are electing a nominee for the Democratic Party. The Republicans will elect their own nominee. We don't need a Conservative Republican vs. "Independent" or "Moderate" option in 2008. We need Republican vs. Democrat (and hopefully vs. Independent). Let's choose a Democrat to represent our party.

2. I am 25. I graduated from law school in May. I consider myself "young" and "intelligent." And, from my viewpoint, I think the college students are supporting Barack Obama b/c they like his rhetoric. He is inspirational, and they want to be inspired. (And, honestly, the smartest people I know do not support Barack Obama…they support Hillary, Joe Biden, Bill Richardson, or John Edwards. College is all about doing what it takes to fit in. Right now, supporting Obama is what it takes to fit in). However, they do not realize that Hillary can be equally inspiring. She may not be able to captivate an audience in the same way that Obama can, but she can still captivate an audience. And, I believe Hillary is the strongest, most-accomplished, intelligent woman in the Democratic Party. She has overcome so much to achieve such great things for women, children, minorities, and the American people during her life. I support Hillary because she has accomplished and will accomplish great things for America. Whenever you find yourself threatened by Hillary, please, at least, remember that. And, when you wonder what those great things are (because I realize most of the people on this blog are going to jump at that comment), please take the time to look up her life story. Don't just jump to the conclusion that she hasn't done anything. If nothing else, she deserves our respect for her life's work thus far.

And, on a side note, I find it offensive that you assume that Americans who did not go to college are "unintelligent." Every person has the right to vote, and no one person's vote is more important or less informed than another's simply because s/he did not go to college. My family lives in Iowa. None of them when to college. Yet, they spent hours pouring through all the information they could find before deciding to caucus for Hillary Clinton.

Mati   January 21st, 2008 7:34 pm ET

Texas January 21, 2008 6:56 pm ET
Obama, you are going to have to be extra strong, for you are up against the evil in this fight."

How is it possible for someone to use such words? The evil? If I only looked at how Obama supporters speak and write, I would just go far away from them and their idol. I wouldn't consider being associated with such a crowd. Sir/Madame, you don't do any service to your candudate.

jest   January 21st, 2008 7:32 pm ET

President Hillary Clinton and Vice President Bill Clinton.
Please Bill, step down and let Billary do her own campaing work. I respect you alot, you campained with no president behind you and you still won because you were the best for the job. Let Billary make it on her own. It will happen if its meant to be. If not We will all support B. Obama for change.

acumeati h.   January 21st, 2008 7:28 pm ET

…Crazy. Never ceased to imagine that Hils ultimate revenge would be a deep-throat from a young lad at the oval office! This might be the whole purpose of the Hil '08 campaign. Check your brains Bill. You've hurt your wife, your family, decieved your congress and your country. Hil '08 is nemesis in disguise!!

Chris, Orlando FL   January 21st, 2008 7:26 pm ET

Hey Barack,

If you can't stand the heat, don't run for president.

DEWITT   January 21st, 2008 7:22 pm ET

1988: Bush

1992: Clinton

1996: Clinton

2000: Bush

2004: Bush

2008: Another CLINTON?

Is that what you people want? PLEASE WAKE UP!!!!!!!

Ryk   January 21st, 2008 7:21 pm ET

I don't like stepping in on the side of Hillary. I oppose her as president and if she is on the ticket I could comfortably write in Charles Manson and be confident I was picking the better candidate. On this issue however I have to side with her or at least against Obama. The Clintons are running a political campaign. Whatever tactics they use are calculated to get votes. Obamas campaign is doing the same. Crying that they are not being fair is an admission that he can't handle running for president. The Bush campaign used far dirtier and cruel attacks against John Kerry. Would crying about it have got him more votes? If Barack Obama can't handle this minor sniping in the primaries he will be destroyed by the Republican spin machine. Also if he can't handle the campaign, how could he handle the job of president. I am not an Obama supporter but I would cheerfully vote for him over Hillary and over most of the Republican hopefuls but I am not going to get the chance to vote for him if he doesn't man up and fight Hillary on her own terms.

charlotte   January 21st, 2008 7:18 pm ET

One other thing, we don't know if Barack would have even won a second term in the Senate.

enomisa   January 21st, 2008 7:12 pm ET

This is for Samuel
I and everyone I know who support Hillary Clinton ARE college educated and quite articulate, intellectual , well read and well versed.
Sorry Buddy, you bought the media myth.
Senators from RED states are Republican and support Obama because they think he will cave in under their pressure. They KNOW that Hillary won't. They know that she will DO what she promises, and that scares them.
Those are the answers in a nutshell.

adipersada   January 21st, 2008 7:10 pm ET

Bill didn't act respectively.
No wonder if he is on Hillary's back.

This careless action only will make more support for the Obama's side..

Bravo Obama!
The change of the world will be on your hand one day!

Feed up in IL   January 21st, 2008 7:10 pm ET

OK, finally had it with the blue dress and the I didn't have sex. It's been ten years, can you guys get over it, his wife has. We need a D win not someone who will not fight without calling a foul. Remember 2000 and 2004? The Republicans will bring up all of Obama's dealings here with Tony, Rod, Jesses, Jr. (the south surburb airport), Alex (the mob treasure, Todd (the son that inheritated his fathers office) and so on and so on. He can talk the talk, but not walk the walk. And, one of the first things I would bring up is Big O's boyfriend, Studman and his partnership with Armstrong Williams, how did he benefit from the Department of Education dollars for no child left behind. The media is afraid to vet him, but the Republicans won't be. He needs to clean up his stuff and come back in 8 years. And really be Mr. Clean.

TYSPOCK , COLUMBIA, MD   January 21st, 2008 7:02 pm ET

The last I checked Obama's spouse was campaigning for him as well! Does he expect his spouse to make her best effort to support him, than he should not expect any less of other spouses, beside this is a cakewalk compared to what he can expect from the Slash and Burn republicans! As one prominent republican in congress said, “they eat their young” so Obama would be their desert !

Elliot Hammdon   January 21st, 2008 7:01 pm ET

The Clinton's are setting this country, and the DEM party back a few decades. Didn't they get the memo? We don't want politics as usual. We don't won't dirty politicians whose backgrounds and visions are so weak that they need to use dirty politics and constant attacks to win. We don't want you anymore Clinton. Go retire, you've had your day.

I'll never vote for Hillary! She is bad for the country! We need a new party, because Hillary and her supporters represent that worst aspects of the Democratic party. Let's start a new party based on sound policies and unity amongst all types of Americans!!!

BUSH?CLINTON?BUSH?CLINTON? And you people wonder why things don't change?

shari   January 21st, 2008 7:00 pm ET

Obama is whining about the Clintons?? Give me a break - what would he do when he came up against Bin Laden or other people who may talk about him…cry to the media who will reassure him he is next to God and bash whoever may not like him. Obama needs to grow up - this is the real world he cannot live behind his color anymore…it's deeper than that. Is this the type of leader we want/need?

Watch him carefully over the next few weeks..his true personality is starting to show. And what's up with his wife - she's never around…makes one wonder. At least all the other candidates have a spouse who shows they support them.

PS Bill may be over zealous protecting his wife as goodhusbands do.

Cory Fisher   January 21st, 2008 6:58 pm ET

You people are saying that Obama is whining?

Im a Libertarian who likes Ron Paul, but Obama is my second choice. Hillary is a fake who will say anything to get into the White House. You people are saying that Obama is "whining", was it not Hillary who became "emotional?" How does being the first lady qualify as experience?

Shes blowing smoke, and she only have her name to stand on.

Paul 08
Obama 08

Texas   January 21st, 2008 6:56 pm ET

Obama, you are going to have to be extra strong, for you are up against the evil in this fight.
Remember there are so many of us watching you and praying that you can make it.
The Clinton's think they own everything and everybody, but there are many of us that feel if a person will lie to you he will do anything to win whatever. Clinton has lied to the Americans and shook his finger as he did. He must think we are a stupid group of people that can't see thru him. He is looking very sick so far his health goes he should give it up.
Let those Clinton's talk all they want to, I don't think in the end it will hurt you
I am McCain age and I retired to give the younger people a chance. I believe in our younger ones taking over. That's what we train them for. When you get to your 70's and apply for a job for 8 years, I hope he talks about getting older. His wife looks young, but he shows his age. He may be strong right now, but when you get into your 70's you health begans to take a toll. Even two years under the stress of being President is hard to understand how he will make it. He says he loves his country, but if he really does, then he would realize his age and do the best for the Americans and let the younger take over..

David, SC   January 21st, 2008 6:55 pm ET

The Clinton's are scumbags, and I don't care what they do and even if Hillary does win. A scumbag family like that will never get my vote. I'll vote for Mccain instead, or I'll vote for Obama if he runs as an independent.

Shrimp Barnicles, Africa   January 21st, 2008 6:54 pm ET

Obama is fighting not only an uphill battle but also fighting with bags of sea sand tied around his legs and sand.

From the perspective of a soccer player, he enters every state already down by 3 before the refree blows the commencement whistle. Think about having to play a soccer match with an an opponent and your opponent is always awarded 3 goals even before the game begins.

Pre awarded goal #1: Hillary's husband was once an 8 yr term president. She receives free popularity.
'" "" #2: Bill Clinton had already built an infrastructure for her to run with. Obama has to start from the scratch.

Pre awarded goal #3: Can an african american win the presidency?

SB   January 21st, 2008 6:48 pm ET

Gotta love the blind Hilary supporters who think he's whining. Did you scream whining when HRC was on meet the press stating 50 billion times that Obama's camp was the one trying to twist things? How about when she cried on TV when she felt the nod was slipping from her? Maybe my Webster doesn't have the complete definition of whining?

Leah DiMarco, TX   January 21st, 2008 6:48 pm ET

Aeolus-

I don't work for any campaign.

But to answer your question…. probably just as many posters that work for the Clinton campaign!

Obama '08

Robby   January 21st, 2008 6:46 pm ET

If Hillary is gonna be President, she's got to show she can stand up for herself. I have no doubt she can, but I'd like to see her do it without Bill.

Aeolus   January 21st, 2008 6:38 pm ET

I'm just wondering….how many of you work for Barack's campaign? ;)

eric downing   January 21st, 2008 6:36 pm ET

Right on NYC Democrat. I am completely turned off by the Clinton campaign's dirty tactics over the last week. The way that they are take half-quotes from Obama and chiding him on his opposition to the war is just dishonest and reminds me of what I hate about politics. How can they bash Obama on his war votes when she's voted exactly the same way on every bill??? They want to say that it's not in line with his vocal opposition to the war…Well at least he didn't vote for it. At least he's had the guts to be consistently against it from the beginning. Just because he's not be willing to throw our troops under the bus for it he shoudn't be derigated. The Clinton's have really lowered the bar in the last week. I just hope the American people don't reward them for it as well.

dan, tx   January 21st, 2008 6:35 pm ET

Bill Clinton did to the democratic party what a certain intern did to Bill.

The reason Bush got elected was because most of America was/is disgusted by Bill Clinton. I know the dems love him, but most of the rest of us don't.

I don't like Bush at all, but I'll gladly see another republican administration before another Clinton.

My vote #1 Obama, #2 McCain. Let's choose a leader who will bring people together.
Unity '08

Mike   January 21st, 2008 6:34 pm ET

Just because Obama is calling out the Clintons for their lies and deception doesn't mean he's whining. It means he is taking a stand, which is exactly what he says he plans to do. That is not whining, and it is not weakness, it is a kind of honest leadership. When the political process gets ridiculous, he is able to make a joke. When Bill partially quotes what he says, he calls him on it. When Bill is the reason that Hillary is in the campaign, and he is channeling the negative comments that the Clinton campaign want to keep apart from Hillary, he points it out.

I think that is strong leadership, not a glass jaw or a whimper.

If Russia continues to move away from Democracy or violates human rights in Chechnya. If China continues to violate trade agreements by disregarding safety standards, don't we want a president who will call them on it?

Why would you call that weakness? I would call that strength and integrity.

In the end, Hillary and the whole Clinton machine owe too many favors and are in the political machine too much to really make an unpopular stand or an unconventional stand, which is what we need in a leader.

We don't need the Clintons to try and pass the same Health Care legislation they failed to pass 12 years ago. We need a leader who can change the view of the US internationally. Experience is important, but leadership qualities don't come from 25 years of favors and back-door politics.

A true leader can quickly rise to the top, which is why Obama is doing so well. He is fresh and inspirational. I wish some of the Clinton supporters who are blindly following her or claiming that her experience will make a difference could take a little more of a chance on a candidate that we can actually believe and believe in.

hlking   January 21st, 2008 6:34 pm ET

For once I would like to see the people of this country look at all the candidates, listen and study their positions on all the issues, and then vote in their own best interest. It makes absolutely no sense to me to see a white man driving an old rusty pickup truck, asking for chicken backs in the grocery store, living in a trailer park and goes out and gets in his pitiful truck that has a REPUBLICAN STICKER AND A VOTE FOR GEORGE BUSH AND SUPPORT OUR TROOPS. It would be sad if there were only one man of this description, but there are thousands.

Tim   January 21st, 2008 6:33 pm ET

Obama is trying to play the innocent victim by saying he is going up against Bill and Hillary Clinton. What was he doing when he brought out Ohprah and when he made all the false statements about Hillary and Bill Clinton. Obama is a dishonest person and a liar. People are beginnng to see through all his hope and change hype. Its all an illusion and smoke screens. Obama plays the race card one minute than plays the saint the next. Obama is a joke with that fake MLK Jr. sound that he tries to make during his speeches. Can we trust a guy like this as president of the United States?

james   January 21st, 2008 6:30 pm ET

type in Hillary no wire hangers in you tube and you will see the real Hillary

Victoria   January 21st, 2008 6:30 pm ET

Please Obama hands are just as dirty.. He got caught red handed at the debate for this camping pushing the race card story. He got what he wanted out of the story. Than trys to pretend he had nothing to do with and calls for a truce to act like he is the good guy. Now He lies when He said he would not run ad's in Florida well guess what he has them up and running. Now if Hillary runs ads the media will say she broke the rules first. In C.A. his camp is sending out flyers telling Republican to change parties for the day and vote for him. Do we really want the Republican picking our candidate? Shady. He is no saint

jim   January 21st, 2008 6:29 pm ET

Got to love cnn's onesided views .They mite get that we the people are not dumb. WE CAN CHOSE FOR OURSELFS!!!!!!

oldclintonfan   January 21st, 2008 6:29 pm ET

Hey Bill, you're not running for office anymore. Keep your mouth shut and let your wife fight her own fight. Unless you just want to suck the support out of your old supporters.

Let's let Americans think for themselves, okay?They, not you, are the ones to decide which candidate is the best. In this case, I no longer feel that your wife is because I don't think she can hold her own. You'll be a great first man, if there's any chance of her being elected, picking up the garage she leaves behind.

Nancy   January 21st, 2008 6:25 pm ET

Oh, waaaah, Barrack.

Further evidence that Obama doesn't have the brains or strategic foresight to run the country.

It didn't occur to him beforehand that the Clintons would tag team him? Apparently he's not spent a minute studying his rival(s). When one Clinton runs for office, the other one is right there behind him/her. It's a partnership.

If you can't take the heat in the campaign trail kitchen, how the heck are you going to handle foreign affairs?

Calvin   January 21st, 2008 6:21 pm ET

Everytime Bill Clinton starts to point his finger, all I can think of is "I DID NOT HAVE SEXUAL RELATIONS WITH THAT WOMAN".

I appeal to Barack Obama to speak in more detail about his achievements as a Civil Rights Attorney.
Most poor and blacks will not seek out this information on their own. CNN and The Evening News are often their only source of information. Give them what they NEED to hear.

God Bless,
C.

Ron, Bronx, NY   January 21st, 2008 6:20 pm ET

Anybody with a properly funtioning brain knows that Michelle Obama is no Bill Clinton. Clinton is an ex-president with an armada of political connections and to even suggest that Michelle's support for her husband comes even close to the type of influence Bill Clinton's support has for his wife is misguided.

charlotte   January 21st, 2008 6:11 pm ET

Wallace,, weren't you most likely a major beneficary of affirmative action, thanks to Bill Clinton?
Jimmy, if you want Bush back you are one sick puppy
If Obama can't stand the attacks now, how can he hope to survive the onslaught that is in store if he should get the nomination!
Face it now, politics is a nasty business. It is not for the faint of heart. It takes a lot of intestinal fortitude to survive.
Look at what the republicans are throwing at McCain. Now that is nasty, really nasty.

Mary   January 21st, 2008 6:09 pm ET

Just because he is speaking on behalf of his wife I don't consider that down and dirty. I think what people fell to realize that she's his wife first and he should support her. SO PEOPLE PLEASE GET OVER IT!!!!!!!!!!! OBAMA just need to man up and get his issues across, lets move on now.

Gavin   January 21st, 2008 6:04 pm ET

PLEASE BARRY! QUIT CRYING LIKE A BABY…

Is Hillary running again Michelle Obama too since she continues to run her big mouth with irresponsible comments like, "AIN'T NO WHITE PEOPLE IN IOWA"

Barack is running along Racial Lines and it's shameful

Sheila   January 21st, 2008 6:03 pm ET

Now we are seeing the real Bill Clinton - down and dirty, win at all costs. He has no sense of fair play. Barack has stayed above it all until he was forced to respond to lies coming from Bill Clinton. Hillary thinks it protects her image but she is way wrong.

Jack ny, ny   January 21st, 2008 6:00 pm ET

you need fresh blood in WH??? Are you out of your mind??? AMerica is in worst shape in last 7 years. Recession is here and your want to experiment. Yes 7 years ago it was good time to experiment. Today it is time to play safe. If economy was booming then yes my thinking would be to take more risk.
________________________________________________________
Allen barcomb January 21, 2008 4:26 pm ET

I think we need new blood in the goverment with new ideas. Clinton to me is only going backward for this country. And we know we don't need another Bill Clinton in the White House. And People should know that Hillery will take advice from her Husband and not from her own thoughts of doing things. But I know if it is between Hillery and Mckain, I will go with the Replubican for President

MT   January 21st, 2008 6:00 pm ET

Anyone who thinks that Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are "not that different" have already drunk the Billary kool-aid. The difference is day and night: between having integrity and honesty (most of all with yourself) and being willing to say and do ANYTHING to regain power. Wanting to become president and feeling that it's your turn are not qualifications for the highest office of the land.

Yes, this life-long Democrat will also vote Republican if it's Hillary vs. McCain in November. BUT it won't be if we work hard and show the country what REAL LEADERSHIP is!

Barack to the future… Obama all the way!!!!!

Dee H   January 21st, 2008 5:58 pm ET

Obama is a sniveler who can't stand a fight. This shows me that he is a softy and a wimp. We can't afford to have a cry baby in the White House. What would he do as President if a dictator like Hugo Chavez made negative statements about him? Go to the UN and whine and complain about it? He says he's going to fight back at the Clintons, but Obama's complaining and whining is really his way of getting others to do the fighting for him. He's a big talking stuffed suit, and the stuffing is as soft as marsh mellows.

Jack ny, ny   January 21st, 2008 5:55 pm ET

MT- you need to see Michelle barking on utube. She was attacking hillary on personal level. SHe spitting venom like no tomorrow. Check her out the one in red dress.
Obama supporters are living in la la la land.

_________________________________________

MT January 21, 2008 5:06 pm ET

MB Nekog: it's one thing for a spouse to be there, supporting and speaking on behalf of the one running for office — as Michelle Obama has done. It's quite another to have your spouse be the bulldog, spitting venom against your opponent while you can keep your hands clean and maintain "plausible deniability"… classic Billary tactic.

Diane   January 21st, 2008 5:52 pm ET

Obama calls it like it is-"IT IS WHAT IT IS"
He "is" running against two Clintons.
People want Bill back in office so they are voting for Hillary. Pitiful.
I could not agree more with the good cop/bad cop analogy-they want Hillary to not look so harsh.
Her whimpering before the last election worked so they are
running with it.
Do you want her whimpering with our foreign leaders? Its not even
her whimpering now-Bill is doing it too.

Dusacre   January 21st, 2008 5:50 pm ET

George as an American, I can tell you that the Clintons are very clever:

The first thing the Clintons do to get a support is to go for their emotions

The second thing is to divide them, and give them a feeling of being special

The third thing is to take way any logical thought

These are the three steps to become a hard-core Clinton supporter.

It will not work this time!

Nik T   January 21st, 2008 5:48 pm ET

Obama's crying now and the Clintons are going easy on him, yet he can't take it. If he were to get the nomination he'd be torn apart by the Repubes. Repubes will use anything and everything to distort a candidate, they'll swiftboat him with no mercy and will destroy him in the first two months… His lack of backbone and whiny attitude make Obama look more like a novice and very unprepared to take on the Repubes.

Igs   January 21st, 2008 5:47 pm ET

Rough and tumble chicago politics? Please. I could see Obama's reaction when Iran detonates its first nuke. "Mr. Ahmednijead, you told us you had no weapons. I was hoping that was accurate. Now I will whine about it on ABC." Wuss, get out of training diapers before you come to school.

Al   January 21st, 2008 5:43 pm ET

The Clinton's have been, and will continue to be outclassed by Barack Obama! This fellow has so much brain power (even over Rhode Scholar Bill), so much attractability, so much persuasiveness that is gaining thousands, that the Clinton's can't do anything but fight dirty. Bill needs to totally step aside. Let Hillary win on her own merits, if she can.

What the American people are witnessing is truly historic. A black man taking on possibly the most powerful politicians on the planet, Bill and Hillary Clinton. Who would have ever thought that a woman, with a husband who's the ex-president of these United States, would be running for president. That's enough history in and of itself. Now you have the drama of a black man also running and he's blown onto the scene in just a few short weeks, or so it seems, to be toe-to-toe with those who never expected to have to fight as hard for what they want.

Barack Obama is a true leader, an inspiration to all Americans, black and white. The Clinton's have been totally outclassed!

Nancy   January 21st, 2008 5:36 pm ET

As a long time democrat, I have to say that I've lost a huge amount of respect for Bill Clinton lately due to things he is saying while campaigning for Hillary. Integrity is extremely important to me in a politician, and in my eyes, Bill Clinton's integrity has reached a new low.

marcia   January 21st, 2008 5:36 pm ET

Why is the media giving so much attention to Mr. Clinton? who cares what he says-is he running? is this what we will be putting up with if gosh forbid she does win? Hasn't the public had enough of him? Do we forget so quickly? Senator Obama don't get suckered in to the Clinton spin-focus on your election issues.

Tim   January 21st, 2008 5:35 pm ET

Obama does his dirt, but when the table is turned, he starts whinning about Bill and Hillary, but he will attack Bill and Hillary every chance he gets. Obama, don't put it out if you can't take it.

Joeley Reno, Nevada   January 21st, 2008 5:35 pm ET

Quit your whinning Barak!

You made the choice to do some cookin' so don't complain about the heat in the kitchen!

Clinton 08!

Ann   January 21st, 2008 5:33 pm ET

I am thoroughly disappointed in President Clinton. It is one thing for a former president of the United States to actively campaign for his wife for the highest office in the greatest land. It is quite another to observe him lying and manipulating statments to help his wife win. It's distasteful. It's very reminiscent of his presidential campaign and the Pres, Bush campaign against Vice-President Gore and Sen, Kerry. It looks like Carl Rove's playbook. It certainly doesn't look presidential. I guess he'll do and say anything to live in the white house again.

Reco Davis, Atlanta   January 21st, 2008 5:29 pm ET

C'mon Obama supporters. Let's all make up 10 different screen names and start posting about how Hillary Clinton is a whiner!

Absolutely ridiculous…

Obama '08

marcia   January 21st, 2008 5:18 pm ET

WHY

Don   January 21st, 2008 5:17 pm ET

once again, before I go brain dead from reading these post. The only people crying and whinning seem to be here. Clinton does talk issues and policy. You can here it in her rallies and find it on her web-site.Same for Obama and Edwrads. The people not talking issues are you. Where is the passion about healthcare and the economy. If you people put as much energy into solving our countries problems as you do writting tabloid post, we could have cured AIDS. This is what is wrong with America and half you just ignore it. I don't know any of you, but do you this much energy into your community. Why not talk about that instead of Hillary's marriage(ps.none of our business) and Obama's middle name( not his fault). I have read some very intelligent post here, but the majority reads like the National Enquier.
Finally, If your an Obama supporter, why in the world would you vote rebulican if Hillary gets the nomination. Obama will work his butt off to get her elected and vice-versa. They are on the same team. If you like Obama, you have to like Hillary, because when you get down to issues, they are almost identical. I think people here need to ask, those people making this claim are they real, or is thier outside forces trying to split a new and powerful democratic party. Don't fall for the tricks. Hillary or Obama will be great Presidents compared to what we have now and what we have to choose from.

dallas   January 21st, 2008 5:12 pm ET

Give me a break. Obama is not whining. He is pointing out what he has been saying all along. That is what is wrong with politics in this country. Politicians are more concerned with getting and keeping their jobs, than doing what is in the best interest of this country.

What Obama is saying, is that the divisive political games are what is wrong. You can not get things accomplished in Washington, by fighting and name calling. I think smart voters will realize this. I don't think the man's feeling are hurt.

While we are talking about boohooing. I don't think I have ever seen a presidential candidate crying on the campaign trail. Talk about weakness. Do you think leaders of Iran, Al-Queda, and others that mean to do us harm, will respect the authority of a woman that was CRYING ON TV, while running for office.

Let's be honest. Obama is the best chance to get on with things. I am not saying the guy is God's answer to a president. But, when you look at the choices we have, no intelligent person can not vote Obama.

CJ   January 21st, 2008 5:11 pm ET

I think Barack Obama is a good guy who has a lot of ability. He needs to stop responding to negative comments by saying the same thing about his opponent. I believe in him, but I hope he reads this and takes it seriously. If he didn't do voter intimidation (which I don't think he did), he should just say "I didn't do that", and get on with his life. I thought he said he wouldn't do negative campaigning. Of course Bill Clinton will say stuff like that. Just be positive and don't let it get to you. Be the better candidate. As for Hillary, try to control your husband; don't let him lie about people's votes and stuff like that. It turns people off. It doesn't matter to me what he would have done if he were in the Senate in 2003. You were, and you voted. Do you support your vote now? Tha's what I want to know.

No more Clinton Doublespeak   January 21st, 2008 5:10 pm ET

Don,
I am a for real lifetime Democrat and have never not voted the party line. I have been able to vote for almost 40 years. I certainly would not leave my beloved America if Hillary is the candidate but I will not ever vote for her. I have had it with all the career politicians and that is what the Hill & Bill are. I am not sure where my vote will go and am still not committed to anyone.
I sure won't leave the country if she is elected. I will stay and fight for a better candidate.

Lynn - Alhambra, CA   January 21st, 2008 5:10 pm ET

Hillary Clinton has said time and time again that she has the EXPERIENCE and her record proves it! HUH?

What we have heard, is this: She voted for the bill authorizing the Iraq War, but didn't mean it. She voted against the bill that inserted inspectors into Iraq but forced Bush to come back to Congress to get war authorization, but she always wanted to limit the president's authority. She voted for the Bankruptcy Bill but was pleased it did not pass. She touts her experience but has not indicated what it is she actually did that confirms that experience. She suggests she is the only one prepared to deal with a terror attack, but never indicates what her expertise is in that role. She says that executive experience, managing departments, is critical… but does not indicate that she has ever done it.

The Clintons' handlers are back in charge. Are we all just supposed to inhale?

Denise   January 21st, 2008 5:07 pm ET

Think About Change said it best. As an African American female married to a white male, I find it a little disconcerting that some blacks are resorting to denegrating themselves to promoting someone who is like them instead of someone who is one of them. I love my heritage and my husband. All the candidates are intelligent, but it's time for Americans to unite and put the bickering aside. I found it especially humorous that all the candidates are speaking unity on the celebration of MLK's birthday and tomorrow, the only candidate who has and will continue promoting unity is Obama.

David Democrat   January 21st, 2008 5:06 pm ET

I've always liked Bill and would consider Obama for president if Obama was not such a whiner. Its true that he does not act like he has the steel spine and maturity needed to weather the hard decisions that will face the next president.

MT   January 21st, 2008 5:06 pm ET

MB Nekog: it's one thing for a spouse to be there, supporting and speaking on behalf of the one running for office — as Michelle Obama has done. It's quite another to have your spouse be the bulldog, spitting venom against your opponent while you can keep your hands clean and maintain "plausible deniability"… classic Billary tactic.

Ray   January 21st, 2008 5:03 pm ET

1st- Hillary did not cry. She got emotional.

2nd- Any spouse would support the other

3rd- NObama is nothing but a wimp. If he cant take it now, he will never win.

HILLARY 08!

Wallace Brown   January 21st, 2008 4:59 pm ET

I am a Black male in my mid-fifties who has always voted for a Democrat for President but if Hillary Clinton wins the Democratic nomination I will vote for a Republican for the first time in my life. If a Republican did what the Clintons have been doing - character assassination, mud-slingling, lying, and disaparaging Barack Obama my people would call them racists and be 100% correct. Why is it that the holier than thou Clintons get away with a hi-tech lynching of Obama and there is silence in our community???? I do not worship at the altar of Bill Clinton and what he and his henchman working for Hillary are doing is despicable and it's high time Black leaders stop being silent about it.

joy   January 21st, 2008 4:58 pm ET

if hillary is claiming that her experience counts when they are in the white house, who was there during the genocide in rawanda

MB Nekog   January 21st, 2008 4:58 pm ET

Why is there always a double standard when it comes to Obama? Obama's wife has been an instrumental part of the Obama candidacy–she's been there since day one, speaking on his behalf, supporting and fighting for the causes he believes in. Hillary, like any other candidate, has EVERY right to utilize anyone within her family circle to promote her causes.

On a side note, I just saw a story on CNN about a recent poll asking Americans whether or not we are ready for a black president. Why hasn't CNN conducted a similar poll asking whether or not Americans are ready for the first female President? Quit the bias, CNN!

Charles in Salt Lake City, UT   January 21st, 2008 4:56 pm ET

Clinton (whichever, pick your gender) is a pandering jerk.

Neither one of the Clintons did a THING for the Black Community that the Black Community didn't already do better for themselves! The Black Community does not need "good white masters" (who expect to be praised and rewarded) to "do" for them anymore. That's what Obama's message of hope and pride is all about — not just for Blacks, but for everyone.

And for the record — the 1964 Civil Rights Act (yes, it was "signed by a President") wasn't what eventually overcame discriminatory attitudes about race in America and made racism unfashionable, it was the beautiful dream expressed by Martin Luther King and the sacrifices of countless Civil Rights advocates!

South Carolina, when you vote on Dr. King's birthday, kindly remember the dream he actually stood for.

Cameron   January 21st, 2008 4:56 pm ET

I do not see what is wrong with a spouse defending his or her partner. All three Michelle Obama, Elizabeth Edwards and Bill Clinton have been speaking on behalf of their spouses. Its just so happens that Bill Clinton is more famous than Michell Obama or Elizabeth Edwards is that why the complaining.

Barack Hussein Obama should stop complaining and take it like a man without trying to act like a victim here. This is why Barack Obama is not ready to be the president! He is already complaining.
He can send out the big reporters like Chris Mathews Russert, and Fineman via Rove to be a mouthpiece for him every time he gets challenged by his opponents.

What is he going to do when the Republicans come after him? They have not even started to attack him. Is he going to run for president under Affirmative Action?
How is he going to stand up and fight the Republicans when they use his full name Barack Hussein Obama connecting and exposing his church affiliation to Nation of Islam and Louise Farakhan.

This shows Barack Hussein Obama is not ready yet.

Lynn - Alhambra, CA   January 21st, 2008 4:55 pm ET

Come on people…make an informed decision and read ALL the candidates policies. Then take a look at all the issues we face as a nation and choose who can best bring about change in a world that so desperately needs it!

Obama 08

Tom, Michigan   January 21st, 2008 4:53 pm ET

Yes WE NEED a CLINTON - OBAMA Ticket to win the white house and CHANGE the WORLD. Join together for countrys good

Wayne   January 21st, 2008 4:53 pm ET

Call 1-800-WHINE

Ayyub, Richmond, Va   January 21st, 2008 4:53 pm ET

For Mr. Obama January 21, 2008 4:08 pm ET

Obama, please grow up and stop whining. You said you want to change the political scene in this country? Then when you started playing dirty, tricky and slimy politics, the reverse of what you are preaching, expect it to be thrown back to you. Most smart voters would not fall into your trap. You are demonstrating that you are just another politician who sets his own rules of dirty politics.
Hillary for president all the way.

You're sad, the person who typed this. You need to ask your candidate about this. Plus, I have a question for everyone. Who wants to go back to the '90? Who wants to move on through time?

Gobama   January 21st, 2008 4:50 pm ET

Senator Obama a whiner? lol

Obama is in an enviable position.

See, this is why Obama needs to be President, so that he can do something about the poverty of American education.
They are unable to see the strategy of the highly intelligent Harvard grad, Obama.

1. Bill Clinton for all his lack of dignity, shame and class, and his undermining of the Presidency, he is STILL a former President.

2. One has to be careful about taking down a former President, even one as low as Bill Clinton. Careful not for the 'man' himself, but care for the Office of the Presidency.

3. So, Obama has to first set up the self-destructive Bill Clinton to Americans who know him for what he really.
Then Obama can really take down .. . Later!.

4. Also, with Bill Clinton running for a THIRD CLINTON TERM, he's giving Obama a chance to challenge the Clinton as THIRD TERM SEEKERS!

5. With a 'man', Bill Clinton, running for a THIRD TERM (because his wife is not that competent) Obama can direct his fire power at Bill, a 'man'; because it would be UNWISE TO DUMP ON A WOMAN, even if she is the shameless self-obsorbed Hilary Clinton.

No need to allow Hilary 'sympathy votes'!

James Lucas Clemmons NC   January 21st, 2008 4:49 pm ET

Quit crying Obama. … it's called politics. If you think you are being double teamed by the Clintons. … God help us if you get the nomination because the Repulicans will take your lunch money and have you for lunch. Fight son ! America loves a good fight. Bill Clinton is suspose to do just what he is doing. It is the luxury She has being married to the former and still very popular President. Surely you did not think they would roll over just because you are a black man. This is politics 101. … You did a great job getting the Republican vote out in Nevada, and yes the Culinary folk who supported you were trying to get the Hilary vote to stay home. … but that's just plain ole politics. You don't have to like it, but you do have to figure out how to fight against it. In Nevada. ..She did and you did not. … learn from it. … quickly I might add, South Carolina is just around the corner. If she beats you there you are toast my friend. If you win, and she is a very close second. .. the fat lady may not be singing. … but she is walking to the mike. Quit crying and fight !

Moodi   January 21st, 2008 4:48 pm ET

Dorothy

I completely agree with you.

Don   January 21st, 2008 4:46 pm ET

Greg in OH, Please. This is the backyard fence tactic. Lets start a rumor and see where it takes us. If the people on these boards spent a little more time going to see their canidates( all of them and yes I have) we would be a lot better off. Instead we have pe