<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Schneider: Clinton draws boos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/</link>
	<description>All politics, all the time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:07:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dee  NY</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-342095</link>
		<dc:creator>Dee  NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 20:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-342095</guid>
		<description>What about Hillary’s connection to Norman Hsiu who is now doing jail time? 

The Clinton’s ( Bonnie &amp; Clyde ) are experience in using cheap shots to get any vote. 
The lack of dignity and trying to get votes by creating false facts and accusations!
Evading honesty for their political gain. Bill &amp; Hillary Clinton: Their Secret Life youtube,
very informative!  Cocaine User!

Barack Obama for president!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about Hillary’s connection to Norman Hsiu who is now doing jail time? </p>
<p>The Clinton’s ( Bonnie &amp; Clyde ) are experience in using cheap shots to get any vote.<br />
The lack of dignity and trying to get votes by creating false facts and accusations!<br />
Evading honesty for their political gain. Bill &amp; Hillary Clinton: Their Secret Life youtube,<br />
very informative!  Cocaine User!</p>
<p>Barack Obama for president!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dee  NY</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-310639</link>
		<dc:creator>Dee  NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-310639</guid>
		<description>Finally!!!  Obama spoke back to her. 

Standing up to Clintons nasty behavior.

Hillary and Slick Whilly Bill have said many nasty things about Obama.
Insults don&#039;t equate to votes! 
Bill can’t be trust and is acting as if he is running.
What nerves... she will say anything to win. Hillary wants to be the first female president… give me a break!  As a women, I find her insults to Obama demeaning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally!!!  Obama spoke back to her. </p>
<p>Standing up to Clintons nasty behavior.</p>
<p>Hillary and Slick Whilly Bill have said many nasty things about Obama.<br />
Insults don't equate to votes!<br />
Bill can’t be trust and is acting as if he is running.<br />
What nerves... she will say anything to win. Hillary wants to be the first female president… give me a break!  As a women, I find her insults to Obama demeaning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LB</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-309582</link>
		<dc:creator>LB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-309582</guid>
		<description>If one understands the way things work in State and Federal Government, they would know that voting &quot;present&quot; is a legislative strategy designed to object certain provisions in a bill that they might otherwise want to support.  ie: it gives them a chance to work over the bill and change the parts that they feel needs to be fixed and to take out provisions that have been added to the bill unfairly
(things that have nothing to do with the bill itself but snuck in to try to get passed)  instead of killing a bill outright. 

An example would be where Obama felt a certain bill would be in direct violation of the Constitution.  Another example would be where Obama voted &quot;present&quot; to bills that were handed out within just a few short hours before it was to be voted on, without allowing legislature proper time to read the lengthly document and form an opinon on it.

Voting present is not a &quot;lack of leadership, or not being able to make a decision, it&#039;s quite the opposite, it&#039;s taking charge, being responsible and challenging what needs to be challenged in unfair bill practices.  Shame of the both of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If one understands the way things work in State and Federal Government, they would know that voting "present" is a legislative strategy designed to object certain provisions in a bill that they might otherwise want to support.  ie: it gives them a chance to work over the bill and change the parts that they feel needs to be fixed and to take out provisions that have been added to the bill unfairly<br />
(things that have nothing to do with the bill itself but snuck in to try to get passed)  instead of killing a bill outright. </p>
<p>An example would be where Obama felt a certain bill would be in direct violation of the Constitution.  Another example would be where Obama voted "present" to bills that were handed out within just a few short hours before it was to be voted on, without allowing legislature proper time to read the lengthly document and form an opinon on it.</p>
<p>Voting present is not a "lack of leadership, or not being able to make a decision, it's quite the opposite, it's taking charge, being responsible and challenging what needs to be challenged in unfair bill practices.  Shame of the both of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KJ</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-309527</link>
		<dc:creator>KJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-309527</guid>
		<description>Obama had no choice...
I&#039;m tired of people suggesting that Obama looked frustrated during the debate. If he was at all frustrated, it&#039;s because he&#039;s being forced to participate in a form of politics that is undesireable to him. Both Hillary &amp; Bill are using devilish &amp; manipulative campaign tactics that sway votes at the 11th hour… and Obama must stand up for the accuracy of his positions on the issues. It is also quite apparent that Hillary is spending too much time engaging in witless statements against Obama &amp; wasting an enormous amount of time and money researching irrelevant statistics about Obama and further misrepresenting those statistics to the public. Hillary must be stopped! Obama is the only Democratic candidate with any political integrity. Go Obama!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama had no choice...<br />
I'm tired of people suggesting that Obama looked frustrated during the debate. If he was at all frustrated, it's because he's being forced to participate in a form of politics that is undesireable to him. Both Hillary &amp; Bill are using devilish &amp; manipulative campaign tactics that sway votes at the 11th hour… and Obama must stand up for the accuracy of his positions on the issues. It is also quite apparent that Hillary is spending too much time engaging in witless statements against Obama &amp; wasting an enormous amount of time and money researching irrelevant statistics about Obama and further misrepresenting those statistics to the public. Hillary must be stopped! Obama is the only Democratic candidate with any political integrity. Go Obama!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Illinois</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-309436</link>
		<dc:creator>John Illinois</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-309436</guid>
		<description>Trust me .We need the Clintons BACK in the White House. Our economy is bad !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trust me .We need the Clintons BACK in the White House. Our economy is bad !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vivia J Chin</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-309218</link>
		<dc:creator>Vivia J Chin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-309218</guid>
		<description>I am voting on reality not on pride or prejudice.Ithink Obama came across as being arrogant,he could have displayed a litlle humility.I also think he waffled on some of the questions that were asked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am voting on reality not on pride or prejudice.Ithink Obama came across as being arrogant,he could have displayed a litlle humility.I also think he waffled on some of the questions that were asked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-309197</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-309197</guid>
		<description>I think we should all take a step back and admire the patience and restraint that Obama has shown in this campaign. Clinton is the most infuriating person on earth. Her hypocrisy is so unbelievable apparent! If she wants to take his voting record out of context, maybe he should hit back by putting hers in context: 
Clinton: &quot;Barack, why did you vote present so many times in the Illinois legislature?&quot;
Obama: &quot;Hillary, why didn&#039;t you not read the 60 page NIE on Iraq before you voted to send thousands of troops and billions of dollars there?&quot;  
And she claims she&#039;s the hands on administrator? Maybe the NIE got lost on HER desk...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we should all take a step back and admire the patience and restraint that Obama has shown in this campaign. Clinton is the most infuriating person on earth. Her hypocrisy is so unbelievable apparent! If she wants to take his voting record out of context, maybe he should hit back by putting hers in context:<br />
Clinton: "Barack, why did you vote present so many times in the Illinois legislature?"<br />
Obama: "Hillary, why didn't you not read the 60 page NIE on Iraq before you voted to send thousands of troops and billions of dollars there?"<br />
And she claims she's the hands on administrator? Maybe the NIE got lost on HER desk...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mati</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-309185</link>
		<dc:creator>Mati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-309185</guid>
		<description>She was perfectly right!
Obama keeps saying.. &quot;what I meant&quot;.. he always has to go again over a statement because he always leaves it vague enough to &#039;clarify&#039; it depending on what is politically correct for the moment. Give me a break! NoObama!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She was perfectly right!<br />
Obama keeps saying.. "what I meant".. he always has to go again over a statement because he always leaves it vague enough to 'clarify' it depending on what is politically correct for the moment. Give me a break! NoObama!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: viviajoy</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-309060</link>
		<dc:creator>viviajoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-309060</guid>
		<description>I am voting on reality not on pride or prejudice.I think Obama came across as being arrogant and I think he could display a little humilty.I also think he waffled on some of the questions that were asked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am voting on reality not on pride or prejudice.I think Obama came across as being arrogant and I think he could display a little humilty.I also think he waffled on some of the questions that were asked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ButterFlyGirl</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-308856</link>
		<dc:creator>ButterFlyGirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-308856</guid>
		<description>I am dismayed at the fact that HRC is going to such lengths to attack BO, she can&#039;t stick to the issues that need to be addressed and focused on without trying to snare BO with some past senate issues that can&#039;t help America at this time.  The past is the past leave it alone, we have to much at stake now for America to get going in the right direction, so that all americans can live without unnecessary hardships.  I just wish for once that the democratic party would just come together so that we can move in the right direction as a whole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am dismayed at the fact that HRC is going to such lengths to attack BO, she can't stick to the issues that need to be addressed and focused on without trying to snare BO with some past senate issues that can't help America at this time.  The past is the past leave it alone, we have to much at stake now for America to get going in the right direction, so that all americans can live without unnecessary hardships.  I just wish for once that the democratic party would just come together so that we can move in the right direction as a whole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ, IL</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-308810</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ, IL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-308810</guid>
		<description>This was a very spirited debate in which Edwards was not the only candidate to show passion.  I think Edwards looked stronger in this debate because he sided with Obama at times and with Hillary at times while still making his points.  But I think Obama look and spoke confidently and intelligently and &quot;won&quot; the debate.   John Edwards looked better in this debate because the other two candidates were not focused on him much.  Hillary looked weaker in this debate.  I was waiting for Obama to play up his early experience as a community organizer in the poor areas of Chicago versus Hillary&#039;s corporate lawyer experience in her early years.  Hillary always talks about her 35 years of experience, but that includes her years in a cushy corporate law job making hundreds of thousands if not millions.

OBAMA in &#039;08!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a very spirited debate in which Edwards was not the only candidate to show passion.  I think Edwards looked stronger in this debate because he sided with Obama at times and with Hillary at times while still making his points.  But I think Obama look and spoke confidently and intelligently and "won" the debate.   John Edwards looked better in this debate because the other two candidates were not focused on him much.  Hillary looked weaker in this debate.  I was waiting for Obama to play up his early experience as a community organizer in the poor areas of Chicago versus Hillary's corporate lawyer experience in her early years.  Hillary always talks about her 35 years of experience, but that includes her years in a cushy corporate law job making hundreds of thousands if not millions.</p>
<p>OBAMA in '08!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anti obama</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-308799</link>
		<dc:creator>anti obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-308799</guid>
		<description>obama is winning SC based on race look at the polls</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>obama is winning SC based on race look at the polls</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Candi</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-308792</link>
		<dc:creator>Candi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-308792</guid>
		<description>I hate it when they attack each other. This show me what they do when they are in the Sentor House. This gets nothing done. They need to forus on there self. I want to know her. If she is attacking him, she is avoiding the answer to the question which make me think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate it when they attack each other. This show me what they do when they are in the Sentor House. This gets nothing done. They need to forus on there self. I want to know her. If she is attacking him, she is avoiding the answer to the question which make me think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anti obama</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-308784</link>
		<dc:creator>anti obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-308784</guid>
		<description>obama is a divider....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>obama is a divider....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GaryO  Virginia Beach</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-308723</link>
		<dc:creator>GaryO  Virginia Beach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-308723</guid>
		<description>No, the boos directed at Hillary were not evidence that 
Clinton attacks on Obama were backfiring.   Those boos came from  the same people who cheered every time they thought Obama made a point.  Those boos are simply evidence that  Obama had some very vocal fans in the audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, the boos directed at Hillary were not evidence that<br />
Clinton attacks on Obama were backfiring.   Those boos came from  the same people who cheered every time they thought Obama made a point.  Those boos are simply evidence that  Obama had some very vocal fans in the audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-308546</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-308546</guid>
		<description>Looking at the comments about the Obama&#039;s voting record in Illinois, I think people need to realize that the system is a little different here than in D.C. When you vote present for a vote, that means that you are there, and have objections to language or certain provisions in the bill. For example, we just went through a nasty transit bill session, that I gurantee you, a lot of people voted present on it because there was language  they did not like in it. As the bill has moved through, those votes changed to yes or no simply because things were changed to satisfy certain conditions. Voting present is not a bad thing, its just meant to show an objection to what&#039;s on the table, and to gain political position.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking at the comments about the Obama's voting record in Illinois, I think people need to realize that the system is a little different here than in D.C. When you vote present for a vote, that means that you are there, and have objections to language or certain provisions in the bill. For example, we just went through a nasty transit bill session, that I gurantee you, a lot of people voted present on it because there was language  they did not like in it. As the bill has moved through, those votes changed to yes or no simply because things were changed to satisfy certain conditions. Voting present is not a bad thing, its just meant to show an objection to what's on the table, and to gain political position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aidyn</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-308511</link>
		<dc:creator>Aidyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-308511</guid>
		<description>Obama does not answer the question he is like everyone else. And I hate the fact that he wants to see like he is better than the other too!
He is so fake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama does not answer the question he is like everyone else. And I hate the fact that he wants to see like he is better than the other too!<br />
He is so fake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-308393</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-308393</guid>
		<description>Kohlbrun....

How refreshing to know that you are voting for Hillary because she is a women and not because she is the best candidate. Now I don&#039;t have to worry that some women care more about gender than this country....

Thanks for reminding me that some people in this country don&#039;t research anything, and don&#039;t care about what a candidate can do for this country, but rather what gender they are....

Very disappointing....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kohlbrun....</p>
<p>How refreshing to know that you are voting for Hillary because she is a women and not because she is the best candidate. Now I don't have to worry that some women care more about gender than this country....</p>
<p>Thanks for reminding me that some people in this country don't research anything, and don't care about what a candidate can do for this country, but rather what gender they are....</p>
<p>Very disappointing....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gr</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-308369</link>
		<dc:creator>gr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-308369</guid>
		<description>Folks,
Present == NO for these bills against abortion rights in the Illinois Senate (they need a majority YES vote). Obama wanted to vote No as he had a comfortably liberal district that would not target him — but Planned Parenthood wanted him to provide cover for those in less secure districts where pro-life Republicans could use the information to run a negative campaign (as in &quot;Candidate votes not to ban Baby Killing Bill&quot;). The Present vote Obama did was a FAVOR to Planned Parenthood to provide cover. And now folks target him for this? This is crazy.

PS -- posted this before and was told I was being moderated. Why should this e-mail be the only one to be moderated??? The above statements aren&#039;t even opinons, they are facts. I was responding to someone who claims Obama did not explain the &quot;present&quot; votes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Folks,<br />
Present == NO for these bills against abortion rights in the Illinois Senate (they need a majority YES vote). Obama wanted to vote No as he had a comfortably liberal district that would not target him — but Planned Parenthood wanted him to provide cover for those in less secure districts where pro-life Republicans could use the information to run a negative campaign (as in "Candidate votes not to ban Baby Killing Bill"). The Present vote Obama did was a FAVOR to Planned Parenthood to provide cover. And now folks target him for this? This is crazy.</p>
<p>PS - posted this before and was told I was being moderated. Why should this e-mail be the only one to be moderated??? The above statements aren't even opinons, they are facts. I was responding to someone who claims Obama did not explain the "present" votes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda L</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-308317</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-308317</guid>
		<description>Hillary spent 8 years on health care with -0- results.  What does that say about her effectiveness?

The &quot;present vote&quot; has been misrepresented - It&#039;s not wishy washy, it&#039;s a way to improve a bill and to negotiate.  Not everything is up or down..... black or white.  How simple if it were.

We need change and we need someone who can bring diverse elements together to form coalitions to get thing done.  I&#039;m tired of Dems hating Repubs and vice versa.  Enough hate... let&#039;s elect someone with a positive view and a record of actually getting things done.  

If you really research it, you&#039;ll see that Barack is that leader.  Don&#039;t be misled by the media&#039;s and the Clinton&#039;s &quot;sound bites&quot;.  They distort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary spent 8 years on health care with -0- results.  What does that say about her effectiveness?</p>
<p>The "present vote" has been misrepresented &#8211; It's not wishy washy, it's a way to improve a bill and to negotiate.  Not everything is up or down..... black or white.  How simple if it were.</p>
<p>We need change and we need someone who can bring diverse elements together to form coalitions to get thing done.  I'm tired of Dems hating Repubs and vice versa.  Enough hate... let's elect someone with a positive view and a record of actually getting things done.  </p>
<p>If you really research it, you'll see that Barack is that leader.  Don't be misled by the media's and the Clinton's "sound bites".  They distort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-308248</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-308248</guid>
		<description>Why do people think Hillary has experience? She has only been in politics as a Senator. Which is the same experience that Obama has. Wake up people!!!

Being married to a liar, and someone that disgraced the office of the president, didn&#039;t defend our country after several terrorists attacks, and reduced our military to the lowest numbers of present time does NOT mean you have experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do people think Hillary has experience? She has only been in politics as a Senator. Which is the same experience that Obama has. Wake up people!!!</p>
<p>Being married to a liar, and someone that disgraced the office of the president, didn't defend our country after several terrorists attacks, and reduced our military to the lowest numbers of present time does NOT mean you have experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Becky Montgomery</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-308084</link>
		<dc:creator>Becky Montgomery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-308084</guid>
		<description>Obama wouldn&#039;t have had to defend himself if Bill and Hillary hadn&#039;t been misrepresenting him.  He had to set the record straight.  You can chalk that up to the Clintons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama wouldn't have had to defend himself if Bill and Hillary hadn't been misrepresenting him.  He had to set the record straight.  You can chalk that up to the Clintons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey, Maryland</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-307913</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey, Maryland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-307913</guid>
		<description>When she drew boos from the audience, just brightened up my whole day.... And  every time Hillary speaks, she gets that smug look on her face that makes me just want to punch her in the nose... Obama is the only one that can truly and genuinely change this country for the better!   OBAMA 08!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When she drew boos from the audience, just brightened up my whole day.... And  every time Hillary speaks, she gets that smug look on her face that makes me just want to punch her in the nose... Obama is the only one that can truly and genuinely change this country for the better!   OBAMA 08!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-307888</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-307888</guid>
		<description>How many times does Obama have to answer that answering &quot;present&quot; shows that you have some things about a bill that you want to work on. He pointed out that in Illinois that&#039;s how you move a bill along, that&#039;s how you work the bill so you can adjust it and make changes that are needed.

For all of you that don&#039;t get that, do some research. Obama gets high marks from BOTH parties in Illinois for getting tough bills passed, for getting things done.

How may times have you heard that about Hillary? Hillary is all about power and getting it from the republicans, and walking the party line.

When is that not going to be good enough for all of you? When are you going to realize that isn&#039;t good enough anymore? We need someone more down the middle that CAN work with both parties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many times does Obama have to answer that answering "present" shows that you have some things about a bill that you want to work on. He pointed out that in Illinois that's how you move a bill along, that's how you work the bill so you can adjust it and make changes that are needed.</p>
<p>For all of you that don't get that, do some research. Obama gets high marks from BOTH parties in Illinois for getting tough bills passed, for getting things done.</p>
<p>How may times have you heard that about Hillary? Hillary is all about power and getting it from the republicans, and walking the party line.</p>
<p>When is that not going to be good enough for all of you? When are you going to realize that isn't good enough anymore? We need someone more down the middle that CAN work with both parties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Farrell, Houston, Tx</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-307885</link>
		<dc:creator>Farrell, Houston, Tx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-307885</guid>
		<description>Again, this is all the more reason not to vote Hillary.  Distortion and lies.  Vote Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, this is all the more reason not to vote Hillary.  Distortion and lies.  Vote Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1971guy</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-307855</link>
		<dc:creator>1971guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-307855</guid>
		<description>CLINTON OR MCCAIN...never obama!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CLINTON OR MCCAIN...never obama!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1971guy</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-307802</link>
		<dc:creator>1971guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-307802</guid>
		<description>blacks like to howl...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>blacks like to howl...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele Wood</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-307783</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-307783</guid>
		<description>Hillary is the one who will be shredded by the repubs as soon as she wins the nomination.  We&#039;ll also lose our young voters, some of OUR blue dog Dems, and yes, a percentage of our African-American voters as well, who just won&#039;t vote for her.  And it&#039;s pretty common knowledge from the Repubs that they are hoping she is our candidate because she is the only person who can ignite the republican base to show up at the polls to vote, NOT FOR the republican candidate, but AGAINST HILLARY.  The animosity against Hillary is not her fault.  She doesn&#039;t deserve it.  She didn&#039;t earn it.  BUT IT&#039;S REAL --- AND SHE CAN&#039;T FIX IT.  IT JUST IS.

Barack, on the other hand, has Republicans and Independents supporting him.

I&#039;m afraid that the Dems are going to be scared into supporting Hillary because she is viewed as the &quot;establishment candidate&quot; when that is exactly what most of America doesn&#039;t want.  

I JUST WANT TO WIN AND ALL OF THE NAT&#039;L POLLS PUT OBAMA  AHEAD OF ALL OF THE REPUBS.  True - some of them also put Edwards, but as the American people look closer, they&#039;ll see some of his postitions as too divisive.  I love Edwards!!  I disagree with Hillary&#039;s foreign policy positions, but agree with almost ALL of her other policy positions, ... I WANT SOMEONE WITH GOOD JUDGMENT AND I WANT TO WIN.  VOTE OBAMA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary is the one who will be shredded by the repubs as soon as she wins the nomination.  We'll also lose our young voters, some of OUR blue dog Dems, and yes, a percentage of our African-American voters as well, who just won't vote for her.  And it's pretty common knowledge from the Repubs that they are hoping she is our candidate because she is the only person who can ignite the republican base to show up at the polls to vote, NOT FOR the republican candidate, but AGAINST HILLARY.  The animosity against Hillary is not her fault.  She doesn't deserve it.  She didn't earn it.  BUT IT'S REAL - AND SHE CAN'T FIX IT.  IT JUST IS.</p>
<p>Barack, on the other hand, has Republicans and Independents supporting him.</p>
<p>I'm afraid that the Dems are going to be scared into supporting Hillary because she is viewed as the "establishment candidate" when that is exactly what most of America doesn't want.  </p>
<p>I JUST WANT TO WIN AND ALL OF THE NAT'L POLLS PUT OBAMA  AHEAD OF ALL OF THE REPUBS.  True &#8211; some of them also put Edwards, but as the American people look closer, they'll see some of his postitions as too divisive.  I love Edwards!!  I disagree with Hillary's foreign policy positions, but agree with almost ALL of her other policy positions, ... I WANT SOMEONE WITH GOOD JUDGMENT AND I WANT TO WIN.  VOTE OBAMA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Akiva</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-307728</link>
		<dc:creator>Akiva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-307728</guid>
		<description>As a Republican I will cross over to vote / support Senator Barack Obama or Senator John Edwards but I will not vote for the tag team of Senator Hillary / President Bill. I am sick of their dirt and misinformation!! ANY REPUBLICAN WOULD BE BETTER than this tag team. A president should be dignified which bush is not and Bill is not far behind him</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Republican I will cross over to vote / support Senator Barack Obama or Senator John Edwards but I will not vote for the tag team of Senator Hillary / President Bill. I am sick of their dirt and misinformation!! ANY REPUBLICAN WOULD BE BETTER than this tag team. A president should be dignified which bush is not and Bill is not far behind him</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-307719</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-307719</guid>
		<description>1988-1992 - George BUSH
1992-2000 - Bill CLINTON
2000-2008 - George BUSH

20 years!

Do you think electing Bill and Hillary Clinton again will be something that will CHANGE American politics and the agenda in Washington, DC?

Wal-Mart democrats need to open their eyes and realize that the Clintons do not care about them as much as their high dollar supporters and lobbyists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1988-1992 &#8211; George BUSH<br />
1992-2000 &#8211; Bill CLINTON<br />
2000-2008 &#8211; George BUSH</p>
<p>20 years!</p>
<p>Do you think electing Bill and Hillary Clinton again will be something that will CHANGE American politics and the agenda in Washington, DC?</p>
<p>Wal-Mart democrats need to open their eyes and realize that the Clintons do not care about them as much as their high dollar supporters and lobbyists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cathy</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-307710</link>
		<dc:creator>Cathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-307710</guid>
		<description>Obama is looking more and more presidential and Hillary is looking more and more like a whiner.  She continues to tell us how she will be ready on the first day of office, yet more and more she depends on Bill.  What will happen if she is in the White House and she and Bill disagree on an important foreign policy issue.  Who wins?  The person with the most experience....her husband.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is looking more and more presidential and Hillary is looking more and more like a whiner.  She continues to tell us how she will be ready on the first day of office, yet more and more she depends on Bill.  What will happen if she is in the White House and she and Bill disagree on an important foreign policy issue.  Who wins?  The person with the most experience....her husband.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-307652</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-307652</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand why Obama is allowed to criticize Clinton but Hillary can&#039;t criticize Obama. The truth of the matter is that Obama has to explain his actions beyond saying &quot;it&#039;s complicated&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't understand why Obama is allowed to criticize Clinton but Hillary can't criticize Obama. The truth of the matter is that Obama has to explain his actions beyond saying "it's complicated".</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Schiller</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-307617</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Schiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-307617</guid>
		<description>I typed my e-mail address incorrectly. It should be &quot;shaw.ca&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I typed my e-mail address incorrectly. It should be "shaw.ca".</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-307582</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-307582</guid>
		<description>This is for Chris, the 17 soon to be 18 year old. First I applaud you for being so young and taking part in one of our greatest freedoms, to be able to vote. 

With that said, I would ask you to research the history of the candidates. I was in the military when Bill Clinton was in office, and I can tell you it wasn&#039;t pretty. Be careful of what the candidates are saying and really research their actual actions.

You are too young to remember the amount of scandals that the Clintons were involved in. Even during this campaign people have asked the Clintons to release papers that would show her stance on issues during Bill&#039;s presidency, and they are unwilling to release those. 

As someone that knows very well what happened in this country when Bill was president, I am very concerned about another Clinton in office. The economy was good, but it&#039;s arguable as to whether or not that was because of Clinton. It&#039;s a well known fact that economies are rarely, if ever, affected by the sitting president because their policies have a trickle down effect. So it&#039;s more than debatable that Bill Clinton actually did anything good for the economy, which is the only good thing people say about the Clintons.

Under Clinton more active duty members of the Armed Forces were on welfare and WIC then any other president in history. When you take into account that our economy was probably the most robust it had ever been, that doesn&#039;t make sense does it?

People talk about how our military is spread too thin, there aren&#039;t enough people, look no further than than the Clinton administration, who cut by the hundreds of thousands, jobs from the military.

Lastly, Hillary seems to be more about getting control from the Republicans and doing it the &quot;democratic&quot; way than unifying the parties and the country and actually making a difference for this country.

Anyway, I applaud you for being involved as a 17 almost 18 year old. That&#039;s a good sign for this country and I urge you to get your friends involved. One of the things I want to see, is more young people get involved, know what&#039;s happening with your country and have a voice in who&#039;s running it. So, no matter who you like, or whom your vote for, good for you, and get your friends into it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is for Chris, the 17 soon to be 18 year old. First I applaud you for being so young and taking part in one of our greatest freedoms, to be able to vote. </p>
<p>With that said, I would ask you to research the history of the candidates. I was in the military when Bill Clinton was in office, and I can tell you it wasn't pretty. Be careful of what the candidates are saying and really research their actual actions.</p>
<p>You are too young to remember the amount of scandals that the Clintons were involved in. Even during this campaign people have asked the Clintons to release papers that would show her stance on issues during Bill's presidency, and they are unwilling to release those. </p>
<p>As someone that knows very well what happened in this country when Bill was president, I am very concerned about another Clinton in office. The economy was good, but it's arguable as to whether or not that was because of Clinton. It's a well known fact that economies are rarely, if ever, affected by the sitting president because their policies have a trickle down effect. So it's more than debatable that Bill Clinton actually did anything good for the economy, which is the only good thing people say about the Clintons.</p>
<p>Under Clinton more active duty members of the Armed Forces were on welfare and WIC then any other president in history. When you take into account that our economy was probably the most robust it had ever been, that doesn't make sense does it?</p>
<p>People talk about how our military is spread too thin, there aren't enough people, look no further than than the Clinton administration, who cut by the hundreds of thousands, jobs from the military.</p>
<p>Lastly, Hillary seems to be more about getting control from the Republicans and doing it the "democratic" way than unifying the parties and the country and actually making a difference for this country.</p>
<p>Anyway, I applaud you for being involved as a 17 almost 18 year old. That's a good sign for this country and I urge you to get your friends involved. One of the things I want to see, is more young people get involved, know what's happening with your country and have a voice in who's running it. So, no matter who you like, or whom your vote for, good for you, and get your friends into it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-307507</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-307507</guid>
		<description>I disagree...I thought Hillary came on as tough, confident, and decisive.  Three adjectives that should describe an effective leader of the United States of America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree...I thought Hillary came on as tough, confident, and decisive.  Three adjectives that should describe an effective leader of the United States of America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-307484</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-307484</guid>
		<description>Hillary was rude.  It will cost her many votes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary was rude.  It will cost her many votes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kofi Brinkley</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-307442</link>
		<dc:creator>Kofi Brinkley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-307442</guid>
		<description>Clinton is not black.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clinton is not black.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mysterious One</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-307354</link>
		<dc:creator>Mysterious One</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-307354</guid>
		<description>Love the way Obama was able to expose the Co-Presidency aspect of the two Clintons, and attack them as a unit on their lack of truthfullness. 

People claim this has nothing to do with the issues, but I think he did an admirable job of pointing out that honesty is at the heart of any &quot;issue&quot; discussion.

After all, what good does it do to discuss every single issue, if you can&#039;t figure out who&#039;s being honest and who isn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the way Obama was able to expose the Co-Presidency aspect of the two Clintons, and attack them as a unit on their lack of truthfullness. </p>
<p>People claim this has nothing to do with the issues, but I think he did an admirable job of pointing out that honesty is at the heart of any "issue" discussion.</p>
<p>After all, what good does it do to discuss every single issue, if you can't figure out who's being honest and who isn't.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele Wood</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-307179</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-307179</guid>
		<description>This reads like a blog by the Clinton campaign cheerleading squad.  Hillary is picking on complicated votes that she knows the audience won&#039;t take the time to clarify for themselves.  It&#039;s a standard bait &amp; switch attack strategy and Barack who would rather just talk straight on the issues and how to solve the problems doesn&#039;t play well at that game.  To vote &quot;Present&quot; in some state legislatures is a technical vote to indicate that a bill should not be killed, but tweaked with minor changes/corrections and then passed.  It means that Senator Obama paid attention to the details.  HE READ THE BILL BEFORE HE voted for it, UNLIKE SENATOR CLINTON ON THE PATRIOT ACT.  And Obama has shown that he&#039;s NOT AS GULLIBLE as Hillary in that he saw through the neo-cons war mongering from the start and both Obama and Edwards knew that HILLARY MADE ANOTHER HUGE MISTAKE RECENTLY WHEN SHE VOTED WITH Jon Kyl and Joe Leiberman (good grief!!!  That&#039;s like voting for BUSH!!!) to label the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, basically the Iranian Army (special forces level perhaps) as a &quot;terrorist group.&quot;  This was AGAIN, like giving BUSH-Cheney another free pass to invade another country who had NOT THREATENED US IN ANY WAY.  

As paper covers rock, rock breaks scissors, and scissors cuts paper, - as I see it JUDGMENT TRUMPS EXPERIENCE EVERYTIME.  I DON&#039;T CARE HOW MUCH EXPERIENCE YOU HAVE, IF YOU HAVE BAD JUDGMENT, WE LOSE.  And Hillary seems more interested in proving that she can be tough like Bush - even when being tough like Bush is still stupid.  i&#039;M VOTING FOR GOOD JUDGMENT AND THAT&#039;S BARACK OBAMA!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This reads like a blog by the Clinton campaign cheerleading squad.  Hillary is picking on complicated votes that she knows the audience won't take the time to clarify for themselves.  It's a standard bait &amp; switch attack strategy and Barack who would rather just talk straight on the issues and how to solve the problems doesn't play well at that game.  To vote "Present" in some state legislatures is a technical vote to indicate that a bill should not be killed, but tweaked with minor changes/corrections and then passed.  It means that Senator Obama paid attention to the details.  HE READ THE BILL BEFORE HE voted for it, UNLIKE SENATOR CLINTON ON THE PATRIOT ACT.  And Obama has shown that he's NOT AS GULLIBLE as Hillary in that he saw through the neo-cons war mongering from the start and both Obama and Edwards knew that HILLARY MADE ANOTHER HUGE MISTAKE RECENTLY WHEN SHE VOTED WITH Jon Kyl and Joe Leiberman (good grief!!!  That's like voting for BUSH!!!) to label the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, basically the Iranian Army (special forces level perhaps) as a "terrorist group."  This was AGAIN, like giving BUSH-Cheney another free pass to invade another country who had NOT THREATENED US IN ANY WAY.  </p>
<p>As paper covers rock, rock breaks scissors, and scissors cuts paper, &#8211; as I see it JUDGMENT TRUMPS EXPERIENCE EVERYTIME.  I DON'T CARE HOW MUCH EXPERIENCE YOU HAVE, IF YOU HAVE BAD JUDGMENT, WE LOSE.  And Hillary seems more interested in proving that she can be tough like Bush &#8211; even when being tough like Bush is still stupid.  i'M VOTING FOR GOOD JUDGMENT AND THAT'S BARACK OBAMA!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dawn</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-307127</link>
		<dc:creator>dawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-307127</guid>
		<description>What is change?  Jimmy Carter represented change after the Nixon debacle - he brought sooo much change, that he was left out -  completely out  in Washington DC.  He got elected as a DC outsider and then was unable to get anything done because he was seen as such an outsider who wouldn&#039;&#039;t work within the &quot;system&quot; nothing happened.  Then we got Reagan.  It wasn&#039;t until Clinton got elected that jobs came open for young people again.  So CHANGE is absolutely what we want, but who can get it for us?

And then the other side of this is that Bill Clinton brought in NAFTA and there went the blue collar jobs of my brother.  So was this enough CHANGE?\

And still we have people starving in the US, and young people dying in Iraq.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is change?  Jimmy Carter represented change after the Nixon debacle &#8211; he brought sooo much change, that he was left out &#8211;  completely out  in Washington DC.  He got elected as a DC outsider and then was unable to get anything done because he was seen as such an outsider who wouldn"t work within the "system" nothing happened.  Then we got Reagan.  It wasn't until Clinton got elected that jobs came open for young people again.  So CHANGE is absolutely what we want, but who can get it for us?</p>
<p>And then the other side of this is that Bill Clinton brought in NAFTA and there went the blue collar jobs of my brother.  So was this enough CHANGE?\</p>
<p>And still we have people starving in the US, and young people dying in Iraq.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saul</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-307121</link>
		<dc:creator>saul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-307121</guid>
		<description>NO CLINTON DYNASTY 

this dabate make it clear.

but let see what saturday will bring. maybe america is redy to pick the right candidate for president. because i think they are seen very clear who is thinking and doing the the right moves for better america.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NO CLINTON DYNASTY </p>
<p>this dabate make it clear.</p>
<p>but let see what saturday will bring. maybe america is redy to pick the right candidate for president. because i think they are seen very clear who is thinking and doing the the right moves for better america.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: susan</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-306943</link>
		<dc:creator>susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-306943</guid>
		<description>Obama is more complex than Hillary and he analyzes issues and bills deeper.. that is why he did not vote because the bills were not ready to be voted on.
We had an oversimplistic thinker and we do not need that again</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is more complex than Hillary and he analyzes issues and bills deeper.. that is why he did not vote because the bills were not ready to be voted on.<br />
We had an oversimplistic thinker and we do not need that again</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edd of LA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-306911</link>
		<dc:creator>Edd of LA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-306911</guid>
		<description>Hillary candidly accepted and reacted on the boos .  She picked up herself and made her point accross, Obama does not make a clear stand on issues. The mark of a true leader is to accept responsibility and taking stands on issues. I did not see that with Obama.  Go HILLARY!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary candidly accepted and reacted on the boos .  She picked up herself and made her point accross, Obama does not make a clear stand on issues. The mark of a true leader is to accept responsibility and taking stands on issues. I did not see that with Obama.  Go HILLARY!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-306772</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-306772</guid>
		<description>What this country needs is someone that can bring the 2 big parties and independents together in Washington. We need all the party bickering and in-fighting to come to a stop. This countries government needs to get back to being about the people, not about the parties. It&#039;s a sad statement when the candidates spend more time talking about what the other party can&#039;t do.

How sad is it that a candidate gets bashed, and it&#039;s news worthy, and overly covered  and talked about because a democrat said something good about a republican. So what?

Is that what really matters for this country? Washington is failing us, and the fact that it&#039;s more important to walk your party line than work together to fix this country is our downfall.

For what it&#039;s worth, I would expect more out of a former President (even someone wrought in scandal for 8 years) than I have seen from Bill Clinton. If he is any indication of how his wife would be in office, no thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What this country needs is someone that can bring the 2 big parties and independents together in Washington. We need all the party bickering and in-fighting to come to a stop. This countries government needs to get back to being about the people, not about the parties. It's a sad statement when the candidates spend more time talking about what the other party can't do.</p>
<p>How sad is it that a candidate gets bashed, and it's news worthy, and overly covered  and talked about because a democrat said something good about a republican. So what?</p>
<p>Is that what really matters for this country? Washington is failing us, and the fact that it's more important to walk your party line than work together to fix this country is our downfall.</p>
<p>For what it's worth, I would expect more out of a former President (even someone wrought in scandal for 8 years) than I have seen from Bill Clinton. If he is any indication of how his wife would be in office, no thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CoffeeBreak</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-306678</link>
		<dc:creator>CoffeeBreak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-306678</guid>
		<description>Those weren&#039;t the first boos of the night. The first boos of the night came when Clinton brought up the &quot;slum landlord&quot; slur against Obama. It was a desperate and petty haymaker, and it met its deserved destiny--outright and unequivocal rejection by the entire audience of the debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those weren't the first boos of the night. The first boos of the night came when Clinton brought up the "slum landlord" slur against Obama. It was a desperate and petty haymaker, and it met its deserved destiny&#8211;outright and unequivocal rejection by the entire audience of the debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zain</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-306463</link>
		<dc:creator>zain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-306463</guid>
		<description>Hilary makes a perfect, sad, pathetic excuse for being a woman and a presidential candidate at that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hilary makes a perfect, sad, pathetic excuse for being a woman and a presidential candidate at that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SKMitchell</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-306454</link>
		<dc:creator>SKMitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-306454</guid>
		<description>I think that Hillary has a very unhealthy obsession with Senator Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that Hillary has a very unhealthy obsession with Senator Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KimSC</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-306202</link>
		<dc:creator>KimSC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-306202</guid>
		<description>Getting boo&#039;d for what? Going after specifics on his record, Obama seemed very touchy about this. Noticed they didn&#039;t boo the other man in the room when he went after him on his voting record, what gives?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Getting boo'd for what? Going after specifics on his record, Obama seemed very touchy about this. Noticed they didn't boo the other man in the room when he went after him on his voting record, what gives?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-306167</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-306167</guid>
		<description>Disappointing from Hillary.. Boooooooooooooooo...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disappointing from Hillary.. Boooooooooooooooo...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-306055</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-clinton-draws-boos/#comment-306055</guid>
		<description>If forced to choose between Hilary or a republican, sadly I will cross over and vote for anyone but Mike Huckabee. A sad day for an educated democratic woman !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If forced to choose between Hilary or a republican, sadly I will cross over and vote for anyone but Mike Huckabee. A sad day for an educated democratic woman !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
