January 21, 2008
Posted: January 21st, 2008 09:06 PM ET
 Is Obama the man to beat in South Carolina?
Is Obama the man to beat in South Carolina?


MYRTLE BEACH, South Carolina (CNN) -
This debate clearly proves Obama is the frontrunner - at least in South Carolina. The other two candidates are teaming up on him, and it's a role he's not accustomed to in debates. Hillary Clinton has always been the center of attention. How things can change!

Related: Watch Edwards and Obama spar over their voting records. 

– CNN Senior Political Analyst Bill Schneider

Filed under: Bill Schneider


Tim C.   February 4th, 2008 2:45 pm ET

Hillary can't win in November !!!!!!!!!! – Vote Obama.

Tim C.   February 4th, 2008 2:39 pm ET

Hillary can't win !!!!!!!!!! -Vote OBAMA..

Angel   January 23rd, 2008 10:56 am ET

It clearly proves, that Obama has no real program..."Bill Clinton" or "I'm a victim" are his only words to defend his candidacy...It's not enough. In politic, you shouldn't judge people on a color or a gender.The most important thing is what they propose and how they explain it.
I like Hillary Clinton not because she's a woman, but because she has more than a dream to give, she can make it...

Joeseph   January 23rd, 2008 2:06 am ET

It's funny, the democrats have gotten REALLY divided here. I support Obama, but feel like Hillary is Bush or something. Odd, huh? Originally I supported her, but lost respect for her when she never complimented Obama, pretty much brushed him aside as a nobody and then went out and made inaccurate criticisms and tried winning on a policy of negativity and "getting real".

I don't know, I almost feel like I wouldn't be able to vote for Hillary in a national, even though I know I should for obvious reasons. Obama had better win here, I don't think she has a real chance of winning a national election. I'm a diehard democrat and feel this way, I'm sure a number of other folks do too. More frustrating, she would probably never even give Obama the VP, because she can't stand being outshined by a charismatic leader like that.

This is the attitude that frustrates me, she walks in there like she already is president and is infuriated that anyone would try to take that away from her. IF she does get the nomination she had better give him VP, otherwise forget it.

If Obama gets SC, I think he could do well on Super Tuesday and hopefully take the nomination.

keithlyn   January 22nd, 2008 11:35 pm ET

I love to see a woman being so strong, Hilary makes me proud to be a woman. during the dabate last night I could have follow what she had to say from start to finish, unlike Obama, everything he said that I understood, I had to question

Jack Toudeka   January 22nd, 2008 9:52 pm ET

Hillary will never go back in the White House. Our country is not a dictatorial or a monarchy, or a kingdom Cliton-Bush. GO Obama GO. Go in the White House. The majority such Democrats, Republicans, and Independentas support you. GO Obama GO in the White House.

Randy Gardner   January 22nd, 2008 9:50 pm ET

I like edwards he keep his cool and thats what we need

john   January 22nd, 2008 9:25 pm ET

Go Obama go!!
You are the only one running from outside the corrupted establishment, and the only one capable of bringing change to our country and our politics!!

Mary   January 22nd, 2008 9:25 pm ET

The SC debate clearly showed Obama inexperience. Finally more people realize that experience does matter most especially for the position as President. Hillary was clearly the one with detailed and knowledgable answers to the tough questions and issues important to the American public.

PeopleWAKEUP!   January 22nd, 2008 9:22 pm ET

It would be a DREAM for the Republicans if Hillary won the nomination. She's devisive, she can't bring people together and she's MORE OF THE SAME. If you all want a Republican in office AGAIN, then vote for Hillary. She will NOT win the general election, because she appeals to only SOME Democrats. The Republicans would not want Obama to be the nominee because he will unite this country and Republicans will vote for him. Republicans voted for him in Illinois, and he currently has the support of "red state" governors including North and South Dakota...PEOPLE WAKE UP!

Obama 08!

Rosanette Lind   January 22nd, 2008 6:45 pm ET

I'm glad you are bringing out the dispute between Clinton & Obama. Personally, I'm sick of Hillary & Bill Clinton stabbing Obama from all sides. I feel very sorry for Obama. He doesn't need to say a word to Hillary when she begins jabbing. I think if he just stayed silent that she wouldn't have much else to say. She is changing what he stood for in the beginning. I believe the Clintons would do anything & I truly mean anything to be in the White House. I wonder just what their reasons actually are for wanting this so much. Quite honestly when the fall elections roll around if Hillary is on the ballot I'm voting Republican. I'm exhausted from it all.

Thanks for all your hard work with the issues,
Rosanette Lind

Lee   January 22nd, 2008 4:42 pm ET

I was torn between Clinton and Obama before the debate. I came away though, VERY impressed by the only adult in the group, Sen. Edwards. He just has to step back, stay rational , and let the other two tear each other apart.

Nomad   January 22nd, 2008 4:02 pm ET

Obama is ALWAYS slow to answer and evasive - he has to think a LONG time to come up with those evasive answers! Hillary and Husband is scary - BUT, how could we possibly think Barack can handle the job of President. Even WITH advisors, he's too green. Heaven help us. Go Hillary ... I guess?!?!!?

A Wolzen   January 22nd, 2008 3:59 pm ET

It's refreshing to see diversity on the stage, but supporting women in politics (or an African-American for that matter) does not mean prioritizing race or gender over issues. This is one thing voters can't ignore.

Tracey   January 22nd, 2008 3:12 pm ET

Thought the same thing....Clinton/Edwards '08!

Here's why it should be Clinton/Edwards & not Clinton as a VP. History has shown that it is difficult for a VP to become pres, and it would be extremely difficult for Clinton to make that transition. However, if Edwards is VP, he would have a better likelihood of becoming pres.....of course, after Hillary's two terms!

Go Hillary, go powerful American women! This is our one big chance! And my money is on "EXPERIENCE IN CHANGE!"

move_foward   January 22nd, 2008 3:10 pm ET

Obama is bringing something to washington that is new and fresh it's time for us to move on too the future and stop trying to put the soon to be divorced Billary back into the white house. Edwards is a distraction he will side with who ever is on top. Obama took them on very well. GOP wants Obama out because they no he will bring a new breed of voters to the Nomination real americans that want real change. Obama 08!!

Andrea Texas   January 22nd, 2008 3:09 pm ET

It would be refreshing if the media would treat Mr Obama the same as the other candidates. What's with the kiddie gloves when he is on the line?

Gloria   January 22nd, 2008 3:08 pm ET

I believe that Obama lost the debate last night. He was very evasive when someone tried to pin him down to a actual plan. He talks about change but has no solutions to offer. Everyone knows we need change after Bush. Obama came out swinging against HRC. But when she swings back he cries foul. I think his inexperience showed last night. If he was to win the nomination the Republicans would make short work of him. I also believe the media is handling him with kid gloves. They do not hold him to the same standard as the other people running for the most important job in the word. I think he is probable a fine man just not the man for the job now. Hillary had actual ideas to offer that would bring about change.

Matt B   January 22nd, 2008 3:06 pm ET

Just psted this from CNN's canidates page:
Barack Obama
Would create a national health insurance program for individuals who do not have employer-provided health care and who do not qualify for other existing federal programs. Allows individuals to choose between the new public insurance program or from among private insurance plans that meet certain coverage standards. Requires employers who do not provide health coverage for employees to pay into the national health insurance program. Does not mandate individual coverage for all Americans, but requires coverage for all children. Allows individuals below age 25 to be covered through their parents' plans. Cost estimated between $50 billion and $65 billion, to be paid for by eliminating Bush tax cuts for those earning over $250,000.

kelly   January 22nd, 2008 3:03 pm ET

Obama is hands down my choice for frontrunner. He demonstrated his resilience through his responses to all the cheap shots launched by Clinton and Edwards.

KIZITON   January 22nd, 2008 2:58 pm ET

By carefully listening to Obama, Edwards,and Hillary I truly believe that Obama was the best. He really does understand the main issues of little American people. He is a good listener. Over and over Obama is touching the heart of all people. He will be our next President, yes President of unity of all American people. In order to bring about change, Obama must fight... We thank God...

Craig, Seattle, WA   January 22nd, 2008 2:47 pm ET

I want EXPERIENCE.. not all this talk about "change" which is all Obama can rant on about. EXPERIENCE MATTERS!.. CLINTON/EDWARDS 08!!!!!

Nazir Jamal   January 22nd, 2008 2:47 pm ET

As a Canadian I watched last night's debate very closely and my humble opinion, Barak was a clear winner, my concern is if they do not stop attacking eachother, the republicans will gain ground and the momentum from the dems.
I also think that President Clinton should not be attcking Obabam the way he does as it unbecomming of a ex-president. All in all the american elections are fun to watch.
Jamal

SANDY   January 22nd, 2008 2:45 pm ET

OBAMS ATTACKED HILLARY CLINTON LAST NIGHT, BUT SHE STOOD STRONG AND PUT HIM IN HIS PLACE. GO HILLARY.

Amarjit Kaur   January 22nd, 2008 2:32 pm ET

Obama didn't stand strong in yesterday's debate. What he did do was rumble on and on; he didn't answer any of the questions directly. I still don't understand any of his plans. He hasn't done much for the country. Hillary has more experience in serving our country as a senator and first lady. As a result, it's hard to have faith that he'll do anything, or even be able to execute anything. What's more is that the media doesn't question him as much as they question the other two canidates. Therfore, very little is known of him. I won't vote for him based on the fact that he is popular, black, or that he has to face two Clintons. Obama's spouse rallies for him, as well as John Edwards' spouse, and she is battling cancer at the same time. The media always being on Clinton's back is making her stronger, simply because she answers their questions head on, and doesn't beat around the bush like others.

CJ Pruitt   January 22nd, 2008 2:13 pm ET

It was very clear to me that Clinton/Edwards 08 has been consumated after last night's debate. I hope that she has better luck with him than John Kerry did in 04. Clearly, they are both willing to say anything to get elected.

I like Obama because I feel that he will tell you the truth, even if it may not be what you want to hear. I applaud his willingness and stamina to stand up there and take it from both sides without resulting to petty insults and name calling.

Though he was not at his best and that is clearly because he was being hammered 2-1 he carried himself with class. He may not win the election because the powers working against him are too great, too manipulative, and willing to say anything to get elected. The Clintons have done this before and will never change because the American public falls for it everytime.

Corey Mills   January 22nd, 2008 1:58 pm ET

Obama can transform our countries DARK yesterdays into BRIGHT tommorows.
Remember We The People meaning ONE. With that said put your civil defenses down for that war has long been over. The old wounds of our nation can only be healed when we recognize truth over personal prejudices. Lastly ask yourself this.
What inspires you? The past, present or future. Tommorow has to be written! So write the next chapter in hard truth, because it is you and I it will affect.

DK   January 22nd, 2008 1:49 pm ET

If you looked closely at the debate Obama started the personal attacks on Clinton and for some reason the media is making him out like the victim? I think Obama's inexperience and the media's bias is showing. Obama may think he is positioning himself as the people's presidential candidate by acting like a newbie when it serves him, but it cuts both ways and it more often comes off like he isn't presidential material. Who knows maybe because of his admiration for Republicans he's taking cues from Bush Jr's schtick of acting like a regular "dumb" joe. Hope it wins you some Republican votes because I will be voting for Clinton. Bill for First Man! By the way did anyone pick up on Obama's arrogance? Especially when they questioned the "change" candidate on why he has so many old Clinton advisors on his staff? He responded to numerous tough questions with arrogance and evasion, yet another Republican tactic.

Judy   January 22nd, 2008 1:36 pm ET

I think Obama did not handle the debate well. Edwards had a point about Obama bringing up their voting records and getting defensive when questioned about his own voting record. What's fair is fair. And as far as Obama complaining about Bill Clinton....Keep the spouses out of it! Nobody is attacking Obama's family! I think it is only right that Bill sticks up for his wife. I would hope that Barrack Obama or John Edwards would do the same thing....and I have actually heard Edwards wife supporting him. I would hope that my own husband would do the same. If Obama can't stand the heat.....get out of the kitchen! AND as for Obama saying...."Same old Washington Politics" when he talks about Clinton.....How does anyone know what Obama will do if he gets elected. Do we say that about Obama in 2years? "Same old Washington Politics"? You can't say he will be any better in several years. It is just a way to get elected because he knows people want change! I say a change would be a democratic president, Period!!!!

mike   January 22nd, 2008 1:20 pm ET

After last nights debate it is clear to me that Hillary is the right woman for the job. Obama successfully side stepped the questions and issues at hand. Instead of clearly articulating and defending his positions he went on the offensive trying to discredit Hillary and the ongoing support of her husband and former president Bill Clinton. Wake up America! Change is needed. Hillary and Bill back in the white house make the most sense. A Clinton/Edwards ticket would be great for America.

L.C.   January 22nd, 2008 1:18 pm ET

It was sad watching the debate last night. I think politicians and the media think average people are blind. Anyone with an ounce of brains could see that John Edwards is in this ring solely to help Hilary win. I don't believe that he was allowed to get away with I am the only candidate that can win in the south. This was an insult to southern whites (the emphasis was southern whites won't vote for a black candidates) and blacks (You better vote for a white if you want to win) give me a break america is changing. Barack have more courage than both Hilary and john. He could have listen to the negatives that said a black man can't win but he didn't. A country divided against itself cannot stand. The Clinton are catering to blacks and hispanic because they make the democratic party but I am afraid the division is going to really hurt the party this time around. Most people that are behind Obama would rather see a republican win than Hilary. I would like to see barack team up with an independent (Mayor Bloomberg) and the two would be unbeatable. Who is funding John Edwards I would like to know the answer to this.

Pamela Watkins   January 22nd, 2008 1:17 pm ET

Woooo...I have reservations about the Cinton machine. I also have found myself, more often then not embarrased by their actions. Good Grief, It was MLK Day of Recongnition and Bill couldn't even keep awake? I think Hillary has more challenges in her personal life and definately can't project a good image to our own country folks. I am for everything I hear, while, what happened to all of us being equal? I am a retired professional woman, however, I sure as heck didn't attack someone else to get there, nor did I use my husband's jewlry or title to make be better than what I just was. For crikey sakes, we have enough of our own baggage in this country, not take haul for any more decades the Clinton's baggage. They just live in their own world as defined by their personal needs first who ever they use or try to destroy to get there. Too much chaos with Clintons and promises not recognized these days.

dine   January 22nd, 2008 1:14 pm ET

hillary did very well last night. she showed obama true color, inexperience therefore vulnerable in the general election. he just can't sustain a strong debate this is so obvious.
it was a debate about records.
this has been what hillary has been longing for all along . a true debate shows how much a leader she really is.

Mike   January 22nd, 2008 1:09 pm ET

America needs a big change. Are there only two families for presidence, Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton? What change is Hillary going to bring to America that she didn't bring in those days she lived in the White house?

Sandy   January 22nd, 2008 1:08 pm ET

I feel that Clinton/ Edwards would be a great combo. I think Obama is bringing race into the campaign entirely too much. Race has little to do with the economy. I am a single white female and I work 70 hours a week at two jobs so it is not easy no matter what your skin color. It is about the experience to get this economy back on track. Our economy was good under Bill Clinton and I think Hillary played a role with his track record! Good luck to Hillary!!!!

Hallind   January 22nd, 2008 1:06 pm ET

All three of these candidates are good. The ones who didn't have enought money to last this long were good too. What we must do is determine who will be the best candidate for President and who will survive the republican party's dirty-fighting tactics.
We also have to realize that there is so much going wrong with American right now. Money, reputation, terrorism, money, global warming, out-of-sight healthcare costs, lack of optimism – hope, etc. We need a candidate who can implement the kind of changes we need in these dire times. We really need someone of the calibre of Roosevelt. Someone who can help lift people out of poverty, give the middle class a chance to revitalize itself, and restore our reputation in the world.

Brian   January 22nd, 2008 12:58 pm ET

When Obama chose Ronald Reagan as the former president to praise, I wondered why he didn't choose a former president from his own party. I really doubt he can be a leader if he even forgot which party he belongs to.

Rosa Jackson   January 22nd, 2008 12:58 pm ET

Frankly, I can care less, concerning what is said at the debates, it means nothing to me. Hard to watch sometime, the meanness on the debate, and reading your responds, is just as nasty. Everybody colors is coming out. I was going to vote for HC because I love what bill did when he was the head man. So I told people if we vote for HC we will get BC, and then he can balance everything we need him to balance, putting ihe country back where it should have never left. Thanks Mr. Bush for making all the wrong moves, and destorying this country. Then, Maybe this is what God wants, Maybe God thinks that we have been second to none to long. I'm still praying for all of us in the USA. I will vote for BO, because HC will not listen to BC when she is the head of the free world. I beleive that BO wants to bring the entire country together, and I beleive that's what we need right now, someone who understands us all. I don't want no one to force me to buy medical Ins. I choose to pay as I go, and every medical bill I make I pay, I sick of all these mandates, and fines, it's just another way for the government to take your money.When the government want more of your money, they make a law to get more, please, houses are not worth the money they say they are, but it gives the the county a reason to get more of your money, taxes and more tax. Gas is too high, food, housing, and everything else is out of control. Check out the stock market, everything is insane. The country is sick and gitting sicker. So stop hating,help BO heal this country, or be like Rome, and Fall.RJ

Victoria   January 22nd, 2008 12:56 pm ET

How can anyone support HIllary when she made such a mess of the health insurance initiative she headed up in the '90s?????? Why do we think she will do any better this time around????? She had her chance - we need someone new.

David   January 22nd, 2008 12:53 pm ET

I guess it takes (2) to go against Obama...... I dont think there will be a Clinton/Edwards 08, if everyone could think beyond COLOR, you could see who the common sense choice would be........

Placidkath   January 22nd, 2008 12:51 pm ET

Since it can't be Clinton/Clinton.....Clinton/Edwards is the way to go. They are pretty much of the same mindset. Obama is not the man he portrays. And his inexperience is starting to show.

Confused Student   January 22nd, 2008 12:50 pm ET

It is clear that the opposing parties 'fear' Obama, they wouldn't gang up on him if they didn't. He has been the one I have liked throughout the election, but I seem to increasingly like Edwards. He is WAY behind, but I think that he definitely controlled the flow of the debate last night. With him wanting to brown nose Clinton, I tend to lose that likability for him.

Obama is handling all the heat well, I still think that there are few things he could do better in order to ACTUALLY become the front-runner. For now, he is doing well, just step it up in SC Obama and you will take control of this election.

Matt in NC   January 22nd, 2008 12:49 pm ET

I feel that most democrats will proudly support whoever wins the nomination. It is frustrating for the Republicans that a winner has not yet been determined. They do not have a clear democratic nominee to attack yet. We should all prepare ourselves for the most contentious election ever. Despite the serious fractures in the GOP and failings of Bush it will be a nasty process that will have many Americans tuning out and showing up to vote. I suggest a button that reads “I’ve already decided so leave me alone!”

Phil Pallette   January 22nd, 2008 12:44 pm ET

Obama's a winning force and outstanding thinker, Hillary a hard working and effective senator, but Edwards is clearly the all around strongest candidate here. He lacks the uniqueness of his "celebrity" opponents when compared with them, but at the grass roots level—where Bush won in 2004—he is the strongest candidate against the Republicans. Why the majority does not see that—it's perception over reality here, and reality may or may not win out. Edwards is a fighter and we need that now. Obama's top contributors are high execs with Lehman Bros, Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase. Accroding to columnist Juan Gonzalez writing about Obama "Among his other top contributors are executives of Exelon Corp., the largest nuclear power operator in the nation. In 2005, Obama talked in a Senate hearing of leaving "on the table" the building of new nuclear power plants – the kind of change that has Exelon ecstatic.
Edwards says "no" to building nuclear power plants. Why? Though it burns clean, there is residual toxic waste. And despite what one MIT expert says, we can put solar, wind and oceanic wave power on line in five years. For example, in 1941, the US lagged far behind Japan in all types of military technology. Look what we did in 3 1/2 years to make Japan's technolgy obsolete! Another example, in 1961, JFK pledged to put a man on the moon by the end of the decade. We could barely orbit a satelite at the time and there were many doubters, but with a concentrated effort, we did it in 1969. We can do the same with solar and other alternative engergy sources. New technolgies to use these resources will be developed—technologies that we cannot imagine today.

Joanne   January 22nd, 2008 12:43 pm ET

Obama you won this debate and you will win the election! . . . I now have hope for the future with you being our next President!

Jeanie Washington   January 22nd, 2008 12:43 pm ET

I truly, feel, Bill Clinton is showing his true colors, Hillary, is a coward. I use to think Mr Clinton was a great person, I think he needs to stop his acts of evil, he is no better than Mr Bush.
you can truly see that his ego is in his way, just think if Hillary becomes President, it will be Bill running the white house. and all the stuff that goes with it. have we forgotten, his past. Trust me at his age, he is still looks not at Hillary, they use each other. I think we had enough of the Bush now this all over again. give me a break. Its sad that people or just plan dumb.
Remeber the money that their dear friend went to jail for. It hurts to think i truly felt he Mr Clinton was a great person at one time. it over for me. He a shrewed man.

A Peruvian Republican   January 22nd, 2008 12:35 pm ET

If Hillary had any dignity at all, she would have divorced Bill. I mean, if a semen stain proven to be your husband's on another woman's dress does not make you spit in his face and take a hike, I don't know what does.

IF HILLARY LETS HER OWN HUSBAND WALK ALL OVER HER, IMAGINE WHAT SHE WILL LET OTHER NATIONS DO TO US.

Hillary, first you have to respect yourself before you can earn the respect of others.

cmm   January 22nd, 2008 12:34 pm ET

The bottom line is this you all are getting played.. You keep supporting Hilliary and the end results in 08 the Presidential winner will be a Republican. I am a die hard Democrat but my vote will go to Obama in the primary. If he does not come out on top i will be voting republican. I don't want to see her in office. It's just like having her husband who i supported. I want something new.

gw   January 22nd, 2008 12:30 pm ET

Thank you Paul from ILL. I have been waiting for someone to tell me what Obama has done in ILL. to show us what experience he has if any! He says he is all about change, what changes has he made for the better in ILL. Please someone let me know.
All he does is attack Hillary for what her husband did or didnt do in the past. GET THIS OBAMA...DAH!!! BILL ISNT RUNNING!! Debate about issues what you you all going to do for us quite attacking... At least Hillary tried to be civil but OBAMA doesnt want to let it go. Showing his inability to debate anything.
You Obama supporters especially vets. This man shows no respect for our flag, he wont place his hand over his heart to say the pledge of alligance, he refused to wear a simple american flag pin to show support for our country and what it stands for let alone the men who died for this country. IF... he was elected would he put his hand on a bible to be sworn in???
Hillary is forceful, She is woman and she roars. There were many women in our history here and in the world who have been in charge of countries and did there jobs well. Stop comparing her to her husband she is HILLARY CLINTON AND THAT IS WHO IS RUNNING NOT BILL leave her baggage out of it.
If you want to know her read her book and you will learn about the way she was brought up and how she came to the point she is at now. Stop judging her on her husbands miss givings.

Ty   January 22nd, 2008 12:30 pm ET

No one seems to be hitting this one correctly Obama is Bush in a different shirt. He is someone you would like to hang out with because you can outwit him and make easy jokes about him. Clinton has experience and answers Obama has nothing to stand on. He doesnt answer any question and I agree with Clinton he gives no straight foward answers. Everyone needs to quit riding the wave of Obama and make a good logical decesion for Hillary.

DP   January 22nd, 2008 12:16 pm ET

Everyone is tripping, politics is dirty business and it has always been. You guys are unbelievable thinking that it is not. Nobody has there hands clean. We need new blood in there we need someone who can change the face of America. Obama said that and I respect him for that. You have no idea what the Clintons have done behind close doors, check it out now with Bill taking shots and getting dirty. Who started it? It will never be clean, I think though Obama will be the best at shaking up Washington, trust me and getting things passed. The Republicans HATE the Clintons, what can she do as President.

ABRAHAM MATHEW   January 22nd, 2008 12:16 pm ET

AMERICA DOES NOT NEED A SMOOTH TALKING, " LIKABLE ", PRETENDING TO CHANGE THE SYSTEM ' BROTHER ' AS OUR NEXT PRESIDENT. HE HAS NOT PROVIDED ANY SPECIFICS ON HOW HE WILL RUN THIS GREAT COUNTRY OF OURS. BEWARE AMERICA.

cemeni   January 22nd, 2008 12:07 pm ET

C'mon you people. Hilary belongs to the past together with Bill. All they do is act like republicans who attack without looking at their own records...lies and more lies. Does anybody re,ember that Hillary is keeping her 12,000 page records (of purported experience) under locks till 2012 because she knows it will add to non experience when scrutinized.
Obama has made a mark in people's minds and souls already! Bill clinton knows this, and so does Hillary and Edwards. Yesterdays debate tells it all, Edwards is gropping in the dark after series of losses from past elections to a possible one in his state of birth.

Hillary, please read and understand policy proposals before you criticize. Rem obama is Ivy league 2X.

Go Obama!

John J   January 22nd, 2008 11:57 am ET

I was a little taken back by the question as well. It was a good debate, however; ther were several question that O'Baby never answered. He started the attacks and then could'nt "stand the heat". I just think he is a big cry baby. He better "get a little tough' the repubs will eat him up and spit him out.

O' yes Hillary Clinton won that debate, on facts.

The Hall's   January 22nd, 2008 11:57 am ET

Hillary / Edwards

Hillary / Bill

Hillary / Gore

Taking all bets!

Terrance, Atlanta   January 22nd, 2008 11:56 am ET

I think it is getting out of hand how people attack Hillary for citing 8 years in the white house as experience...as if she was lying on her back the entire time. She was very active in his administration. She was an advocate of education and healthcare reform as first lady just as she continues to be today.

If I was the son of Johnny Cochran, my mere exposure to such legal savvy would better equip me to understand the law. If I then qualified that exposure by becoming a member of the bar and practicing at on of the top firms in the world, then I would add my last name to my resume. Just as Hillary has gained exposure to Bill, she was the confidant, the pillow talk advisor, and the dinner table consultant to one of the most brilliant political minds in the Democratic Party. She qualified that experience by serving the constituents of NY on the Armed Services committee.

Is that not experience...

Kerri   January 22nd, 2008 11:52 am ET

I am voting for John Edwards b/c he has the most comprehensive, UNDERSTANDABLE, and well thought out plans for everything from education, to health care, to a withdrawal strategy in Iraq. Hillary is my second choice. I am beginning to think that I would rather vote for a Republican than Sen. Barak "if you stand for nothing, you will fall for anything" Obama.

@lex   January 22nd, 2008 11:49 am ET

Clinton/Edwards 08. Edwards knows the he is not a contender anymore. so i think the right choice for him should be to team up with Clinton. 1

Rachel   January 22nd, 2008 11:42 am ET

As clean and positive as Obama has been trying to run his campaign, unfortunately he will have to start slinging some mud back and defend himself against false and inaccurate accusations. The Clintons know that they have way more skeletons in their closets so they are pulling at straws trying to smear Obama's name. Oh, and Bill needs to STFU. It's his wife running, not him, and him trying to bad mouth his wife's opponents are not earning her any admirers.

Paul_Illinois   January 22nd, 2008 11:36 am ET

Obama is all talk and hype, his credentials are hyped by the friendly media and have gotten the right scrutiny, so is his personal deal with lobbyists here in Illinois, PACS and corporations like Exelon that have financed his political career from the beginning, not to mention the shady deals with his long time friend Rezko here. The fact that Obama trying to said that he only worked 5 hours by the Rezko firm, what he's doing is trying to change the fact that he knew Rezko for 15 years, he was one of this big fundrisers, worked in his firm, and even after knowing he was about to be indicted he decided to make a deal on the house; now that is bad judgement!
You can tell Obama has not answer for the hard question, like his pattern on voting "present" in Illinois or avoiding and skipping the hard votes in the US Congress. He can't have it both ways, vote in favor of corporations or skip votes when their interest are at stake and the claim he lead or criticize his opponents for taking position even tho they are unpopular.
Obama probably got very used to soon to the positive press and lack of criticism and tho he was in a congeniality contest, tho he knows that his surrogates have been attacking Edwards and Hillary from the beginning, now is time for him to answer questions, so far he hasn't been good at it and looks awful when they put him on the spot!

Doug Barth   January 22nd, 2008 11:36 am ET

All three looked really strong. The Dems are going to come out of this with a great nominee.

Nick, Austin, TX   January 22nd, 2008 11:26 am ET

I can't see how anyone saw last night as a good night for Hillary. I started out not very fond of her or giving her the Clintons' third term but since that time she has started to win me over. In the various debates (of which I have watched every single one) she has shown me she is smart, capable, sometimes funny, tough and possibly a good future president.

That being said I was so disapointed with how she acted in the debate last night. She could have started with real issues about Obama but she went with the thing about him saying "he liked Republican ideas" which he obviously if you actually saw the piece, didn't say.

I am also very uncomfortable with how she switches between taking credit for her time since '92 (she refrenced "16 years" I think three times last night) and neglecting to account for failures made durring his time. Also if she is saying she was such an active part of his decisions that she can take credit for that experiance then isn't that saying we are voting also for Bill Clinton to have that much of a say in her administration and isn't that a problem for a country where we don't live under royal family rule.

One other thing is that I don't really think she can take the progressive mantle until she addresses her husbands centrism durring his time. If her husband had been a "fighter" I don't think we would have ended up with the idiotic "Don't ask don't tell" policy or the watered down gun control laws or any number of weak center ideas.

I like Bill Clinton and I like Hillary Clinton. I want to feel good if I decide to vote for her but with the way she is playing the game this last week and in the debate it is making it hard for me to support her even in a general election if she comes up against someone reasonable like McCain (and I am an ultra-liberal democrat so that is saying a lot).

I think she has lots of strengths and should use those instead of playing the childish cards I think she is playing.

Obama I wish hadn't acted the way he acted last night either. I like him quite a bit as well and was disapointed by much of what he said as well.

When it started I had three Democrats I felt good with (I had liked Biden too) and now I feel the only one who has been talking about his own ideas is John Edwards who I really might vote for now (even if he can't win) if Obama and Clinton can't get back to the point.

Kevin   January 22nd, 2008 11:23 am ET

I didnt understand Edwards going after Obama for is present voting record. according to Project Vote Smart Edwards has not shown up to over thirty votes in around 150. How is not showing up to vote any different then showing up and choicing not to take a side. At least Obama had the respect of his office and the people that put him in it to show up.

rajendra ram   January 22nd, 2008 11:17 am ET

Obama handled the arguments very comfortably. Some of you guys here, are great KOOL AID drinkers. Your perception of the facts are the same waty that Hillary distorts them. Obama is a very intelligent person and his process of thinking are carefully expressed, Unlike, Clinton and Edwards who are percipitating the facts which are out of context. Hillar's health care plan need tremendous funding and how will she and edwards fund this. You the people will face this burden and I hope you are ready for this. Some of you really forget how both the Clintons tried to berate Obama, and many times distorting the facts. So it is not appropriate to counter-attack them ????Obama did the right thing. He did not fumble as many of you are saying, he provided the right info. cleverly. In some way he may be a bit slow in his presentation, but he did put forward his message.
We will never have someone like this, again. I will vote for him in the Primar, but if he is not nominated I will vote Republican
Raj

Chioces2008   January 22nd, 2008 11:16 am ET

It is amazing that Obama and HIS TEAN have soooo keenly put this election into a battle between "African" American interests vs the forefront of American Interests... Our Nation's position in the world economy effects OUR Country, Our People, Our Futures, Not just "His" making history and bringing a new "face" as the LEADER to bringing our nation out of the most horrific position we have ever been in.

BARAK DOES NOT HAVE THE EXPERIENCE OF GOVERNMENT – HE DOES NOT HAVE THE POLITICAL POWER TO ACTUALLY EFFECT CHANGE!

WE DO NOT NEED ANOTHER "FACE" WHILE OTHERS ARE WORKING BEHIND THE SCENES ON AGENDAS THAT ARE NOT IN OUR COUNTRY'S LONG TERM INTERESTS!

I WANT A PRESIDENT THAT DOES NOT HAVE TO LEARN WHERE THE BATHROOM IS, MUCH LESS THE PROTOCOLS IN THE "SITUATION ROOMS" OVERSEEING OUR NATION'S PROBLEMS!

WAKE UP AMERICA! WE DO NOT NEED ANOTHER GEORGE BUSH SHRUG-OFF "OH, OKAY" GUY IN THE WHITE HOUSE!

Katy   January 22nd, 2008 11:11 am ET

I surely don't want Bush-Clinton-Bush and Clinton again. I will vote for the best candidate who last name is not Clinton. Awake and think deeply, American. It is time for new change and America must be strong and get back the respect from the world. Also, America must be united and strong and ready to deal with giant Red – China. Be prepared if Hillary is president, we will see more and more "made in China" and more and more jobs will be exported to China & oversea. Has any one think about China contribution to Hillary's campaign? Legacy is legacy and past is past. It is time for change and move forward. Clinton is legacy and past. Do you want Bill Clinton to be one of our Supreme Court? She will nominate him as reward.

Pravin   January 22nd, 2008 11:10 am ET

It is really unfortunate that Obama did not realized the feelings that strong Democrats have against President Ronald Regan and his political philosophy. He gave Mr. Clinton an opening and she has successfully slammed him. I think this a major blow to his credibility with Democrats like me, who work tirelessly at the local and state level compete with Republicans to get Democrats elected. When you add this to his constant mantra of compromising with Republican neocons, make us wonder about his core values.

Rhonda   January 22nd, 2008 11:07 am ET

If HC & JE would stop interrupting Obama and allow him to finish his statements, perhaps some of you who felt that he did not answer to your satisfaction would have heard the answer. I think that is a tactic people play when they make accussations, and then talk all over the person prohibitng that person from giving you the answer.

The democratic party is in just as much trouble as the republican party. If we keep this back and forth, where will it get us in November.

Bill Clinton needs to chill, and now I believe that it is He, who is actually running for president. Hillary has no experience. She is running on her husbands record. She did not have security entrance as first lady. What policies did she pass while in the White House, she could not get health care passed. She was just the first lady.

Clinton supporters or loyal to Bill, and that spills over to Hillary.

We need to really THINK Loyalty over Honesty in government

PatElly   January 22nd, 2008 11:07 am ET

Obama made a big mistake attacking Hillary, he left an impression he was like everyone else and not this picture of being the one to "unifiy" the parties. He looked unpresidential and not like a leader–fustrated and out of sync. Hillary stood her ground and responded like a leader–poised, knowledgeable and ready to lead. Step aside men, here she comes whether you like it or not!!!...

Dennis   January 22nd, 2008 11:06 am ET

Whether Obama or Clinton win Democratic nod, it will guarantee Republican president... If the choice was just those two, there is no way I would ever vote for Clinton. It is sad, because although this country needs a change from the existing, those two will further another 4 years of Republican rule. So recession here we come!

Anonymous   January 22nd, 2008 11:03 am ET

I can't see how people can think that Obama is ready to be President of such a great country. For crying out loud he's only been a Senator for what three years? How can someone with that little experience be ready to run such a great country? Wake up people this is like getting another GW to run this country. My pick is Hillary. She has the experience to run this country and run it well.
I'll give Obama this prop though, he's an educated man and well spoken, but then again good speeches cannot run a country. Hillary has the know how. John Edwards did very well last night. I think Hillary will win and it will be her choice to pick Obama or Edwards to be her vice and when she choose, she must choose wisely.

AKB   January 22nd, 2008 11:03 am ET

Raising the spectre of Rezko and his "present" votes, he is finally being seen for what he is – a regular, typical politician.

Bob H   January 22nd, 2008 11:03 am ET

I am a New Hampshire voter who voted for Edwards. One can see by the debate last night why I did.

Joe   January 22nd, 2008 10:52 am ET

I cannot believe that NO ONE questions Obama about anything. Just because you can talk the talk, doesn't mean you can walk the walk. He is far from presidential. He has no clear cut direction in his policy and he has always taken the easy way out by not being decisive on important decisions...especially where the Democratic Party is concerned.

And if you think he hasn't made this a Racial issue... HE HAS.. quit pointing fingers elsewhere he is as much to blame about making race an issue as any one else.

As far as the economy .... I would gladly embrace 8 more years of a Clinton White House over the status quo ... it was the first president to have the balls to shut down the government if congress (A REPUBLICAN ONE I MIGHT ADD) did not balance the budget.

We don't need a pretty boy president we need experience and we need someone who is going to be extremely tough .. and he is a big Wimp the Republican's will eat him alive if he emerged as the Ticket choice. If you all can't see that you are completely blind.

Hillbilly Bob   January 22nd, 2008 10:52 am ET

As a white man, after this debate I can perfectly well understand why all my fellow Black Americans (both men AND women) will vote for Obama (and, yes, I will join them and even ask all my white buddies to do the same).. The same finger that once angrily declared that he "did not have sex with that woman" is now wagging behind-the-scenes against Obama, spreading all kinds of nasty rumors, innuendo and political filth. What Clintons are doing is the good old character assassination tactics they are so adept at. After seeing Hillary Clinton's anger-contorted face in yesterday's debate, I don't see how anyone – black OR white OR yellow could vote for Senator Clinton. The only person who will benefit from Hillary Clinton's nomination is Carl Rove, which would be a catastrophe for ALL Americans – both black AND white. Run, Obama, run...don't let them Vince Foster you. You have my vote. God speed and God bless.

tberry325   January 22nd, 2008 10:37 am ET

I watched the debates last night with mixed feelings.

I am a life long democrate and the pride I had at the start of this campaign for the 2008 democratic nomination has been deminished by all the back and forth between the candidates.

Due to the Clinton's desire to win the Whitehouse no matter the cost to the party – they have successfully knocked Barrack down to their level. I know this is par for the course in politics, however I just hoped once we could have a campaign that focused on the issues and the country. When their backs were against the wall in NH we saw the Clinton machine go into action and said and did whatever it took to smear Obama. For weeks now, he has been on the defense trying to put forth the truth vs the lies the distortions the Clintons have put into the mix. He had no choice but to stand up last night and show he could take them on – however in doing so, it was not the best night for the Party.

I am proud of the campaign he has tried to run and I wish him well, however my feeling is that the machine will win – IT ALWAYS has.

BUT I AM ONE DEMOCRATE WHO IS DISAPPOINTED AND FEEL THAT THE CLINTONS HAVE HURT THE PARTY AND OUR CHANCE FOR A WIN IN 2008. THEY MAYBE ABLE TO DISTORT OBAMA'S RECORD, BUT THE REP WILL NOT HAVE MERCY WHEN IT COMES TO REMINDING ALL OF US WHAT THE CLINTON YEARS WERE REALLY ABOUT – FULL OF INVESTIGATIONS AND LIES.

I FOR ONE WILL NOT VOTE FOR HILLARY CLINTON IF SHE IS THE CANDIDATE. IF THIS MEANS THE REP WIN – SO BE IT.

Jan   January 22nd, 2008 10:29 am ET

In last nights debate, Hillary was poised and had a good sense of humor over some of the nonsense being put in front of her. Enough with the Black and female voter questions. Oh, by the way, YES, Bill WAS the first Black President! What a ridiculous question to ask. What does that have to do with what these candidates stand for?

Mike   January 22nd, 2008 9:17 am ET

I think the headline says it all – Clinton is not the one.

Mike   January 22nd, 2008 8:34 am ET

I lost alot of respect for John Edwards after this debate. I was hoping he could win. But he is so desperate now that he has turned to the dark side and joined Clinton, obviously hoping to be her VP. I will not vote for any ticket that has Clinton on it.

DWLesch   January 22nd, 2008 8:30 am ET

I am afraid that if Hillary Clinton is elected we are going to see total grid lock and all voting will again be along party lines. We need somebody that the opposition party does not hate and might be willing to work with and that is not Hillary Clinton.

I am tired of all the party fighting and getting no where. The worst part is that the majority of the party members don't care what you or I think.

laila   January 22nd, 2008 7:13 am ET

The truth of the matter is that Sen. Clinton was a board member to Wal-mart for six years and that the Walton family played a huge role in her husband’s political career. For this help Arkansas Gov. (and later President) Bill Clinton assisted Wal-mart when it came to the free trade agreement known as NAFTA. In addition, Sen. Clinton’s Rose Law Firm even handled much of Wal-marts legal defense.

Perhaps it is time for someone to publicly question her about her connection to Wal-mart and ask for straight answers.

Jane   January 22nd, 2008 7:12 am ET

"Truth is Obama will win SC and Hillary will come in a dissappointing 3rd place
She will have to pick herself up for Super Tuesday.
Senator Edwards won this debate and would probably win all the debates until he drops out of the race for a second time.
Super Tuesday will be interesting,Obama is obviously a formidable opponent, and it would be interesting to see the outcome."

Fabulous!! I completely agree!! MY VOTE IS FOR OBAMA!!

Ron Az   January 22nd, 2008 5:06 am ET

Here you go again!! saying Barack is the front runner, the caucus in SC hasn't even run yet and Schnider is telling us who is the winner!!!! I believe all of you political analysts need to stop trying to sway the American people who to vote for and just shut up and report just whats happening, don't try to help, its obvious that you are not very good at your jobs.

jake   January 22nd, 2008 4:54 am ET

Obama go go go home, Hillary go go go to the White House

gideon   January 22nd, 2008 4:35 am ET

I think its the army(barack obama) against two. people say that he was given more time in the debate i say thats not true, if it seemed to be so then i should think it was because he was speaking way better than his rivals. sc is a win tucked on baracks belt move on guys.

j   January 22nd, 2008 3:25 am ET

y doesn't anyone at cnn give obama a hard time...lets ask him hows he going to pay for everything and what exactly his plans are for healthcare. Call him out on his weaknesses.

Ginny CA   January 22nd, 2008 12:57 am ET

Bill, How can you possibly say that the debate clearly showed Obama as the front runner? (Unless you were basing your assessment on the fact that tonight's audience obviously favored him.) His answers were confusing at best, he started the dust-up with Hillary by firing a shot at her (Wal-Mart) and she fired back (Rezko) This seemed to put him on the defensive and he wasted time groping around trying to find his footing. More time was wasted when answering questions: he stammered and stated facts and statistics that we already knew before coming out with anything remotely substantial. In fact, I fell asleep twice as he droned on in an overly long attempt to explain something or other. (Sorry, I can't say what it was as I was asleep.)

Bottom line: he's stumbling and appears to be in over his head. I mean, his performance wasn't terrible, just weak. He may win South Carolina but I'm not even totally convinced of that. Hillary was strong, and Edwards did very well, also. In fact, as far as tonight's debate went, I would rate it: First Clinton, Second Edwards, Third Obama.

andrea benini   January 22nd, 2008 12:43 am ET

hillary was always in charge

Andrew   January 22nd, 2008 12:16 am ET

Truth is Obama will win SC and Hillary will come in a dissappointing 3rd place
She will have to pick herself up for Super Tuesday.
Senator Edwards won this debate and would probably win all the debates until he drops out of the race for a second time.
Super Tuesday will be interesting,Obama is obviously a formidable opponent, and it would be interesting to see the outcome

anti obama   January 21st, 2008 11:43 pm ET

Nevada: 85% blacks obama; 35% white; less than that hispanics

anti obama   January 21st, 2008 11:38 pm ET

Only hillary 08

Anti Clintons   January 21st, 2008 11:38 pm ET

Vic las veagas NV, boy are youstupid or is that normal for you! Hitlery LOST, LOST. LoST! she lost her mind like you have. Obama kicked her fat butt all over the stage boy!

Go Obama

Mauri, Hitlery couldn't beat a stick if it stood it still! You lib freak!

1971guy   January 21st, 2008 11:17 pm ET

good speaking does not a good president make...

OBAMA(VOTER)   January 21st, 2008 11:15 pm ET

i think obama held it togethor but he was shaky, so people get nervous, im just glad he stuck to his ideas, instead of hillary bickering about NOTHING

OBAMA-08

peter   January 21st, 2008 11:14 pm ET

do mister Clinton belive that an african american president is a fairy tale?

Vic Las Vegas, Nevada   January 21st, 2008 11:14 pm ET

Hillary Clinton clearly won this debate.

Obama didn't answer any of the questions that were controvercial.

He himmed and hawwwed and looked pitiful.

And his constant whining about running against both Bill and Hillary...

This is so NOT THE PICTURE OF A WORLD LEADER.

Hillary Clinton WON, WON, WON!

Marla   January 21st, 2008 11:10 pm ET

Barack has an impressive resume but at this point in time, he is not the most qualified candidate to be the leader of the free world. What is currently destroying the middle class is the war in Iraq, the cost of healthcare, the cost of gasoline and the slump in the housing market. Hillary has definite plans for making change and improvements, she does not consistently tell everyone we need change. WE ALREADY KNOW WE NEED CHANGE. We want specifics! Hillary is providing real details, not rhetoric. Barack has a gift for bringing people out, Hillary has the programs to put that power to work!

Gene   January 21st, 2008 11:07 pm ET

You've got to be kidding. Obama may seem the front-runner to you in SC, but the people of SC are smarter than you give them credit for. I think Hillary has found herself a possible running mate and Obama will be out in the cold.

Basquale   January 21st, 2008 10:57 pm ET

You will all be losers. McCain will be the third Bush term which Americans will vote for. Sadly. Sadly. Obama is your chance not only for you but the rest of the World. Take it or leave it!

Marcy   January 21st, 2008 10:57 pm ET

Obama did good job in SC. Especially considering that many of the questions were race-centered....under the guise of it being MLK day. (yeah....right) I mean, we don't see CNN covering "Gender and Politics 2008" now do we?

One thing for sure, if I was in Hillary's camp right now, I'd be cringing a little after that slanderous "slum lord" comment ….or about the fact that she was BOOed!

Poor Edwards is just trying to stay in the game any way he can.

Farrell, Houston, Tx   January 21st, 2008 10:56 pm ET

People don't plan to give the Clintons a "free pass" as they have always received. They aren't afraid to vote NO to the Clintons, no free pass this time. The Clintons are legally out of boundaries and can't be stopped legally, but saying NO vote will stop them.

Jack ny, ny   January 21st, 2008 10:56 pm ET

omg people are talking healthcare, recession and Obama comes in with that. It is almost beauty contest question. save the world. bring peace,
__________________________________________________________________
Jack January 21, 2008 9:29 pm ET

Obama is on his strongest point right now…………speaking about unifying all the races of the country

marge   January 21st, 2008 10:50 pm ET

Obama is definitley one of the 'front runner's",like it or not. I think his 38 delegates should be proof of that.
Hillary and Bill Clinton can also attest to that. I keep hearing Hillary and other people talking about "Her Experience". Is she refering to the 8 years she spent in the WH as the first lady? Or her stint as a Senator?
Not any of the 3 have first hand Presidental experience.
John Edwards, is trying to get in where ever he can fit in. He's not showing well at all. Maybe SC will help him turn it around.
As far as the GOP field being too much for Senator Obama...with their ties to Bush,its doubtful that they can do more than defend themselves for supporting the President.
These Republican candidates are as worried about distancing themselves from the Bush administration as they are pandering for money and votes.
Obama doesn't need to go to debate camp. Bush has been in office for almost 8 years, and he doesn't even exercise common sense. he could never be a poster boy for Intelligence,now could he.

Susan-VA   January 21st, 2008 10:50 pm ET

Linda, that is exactly it. WE DO NOT NEED A RE-RUN OF THE SAME OLD POLITICS FULL OF SCANDALS. WE NEED CHANGE AND OBAMA IS THE MAN WHO CAN BRING ABOUT THAT REFRESHING CHANGE!

Becky Montgomery   January 21st, 2008 10:50 pm ET

If Hillary is so good with health care reform, why didn't her plan work? It was so bad that it never was even enacted. I can't believe she continues to argue that she knows what to do.

If she goes up against the Republicans, they will throw that in her face EVERY time. After they question her "35 years of experience."

Greg   January 21st, 2008 10:49 pm ET

There was a third candidate on the stage, right? I'm a bit disgusted at how coverage and commentary on CNN is turning this into the Clinton/Obama special.

Belle   January 21st, 2008 10:49 pm ET

I hope that Obama is not the front runner. He fails to provide specifics or when questioned on the few he does provide, he changes his stance. He is also very condescending to his opponents and anyone who disagrees with him. Haven't we already proven with Bush that substance does matter?

Tony Elswick   January 21st, 2008 10:48 pm ET

Bill Clinton is on the trilateral commission!! GOOGLE IT!!!

SAM   January 21st, 2008 10:47 pm ET

Obama did very well and clearly won his debate, Hillary know by now that whe can no continuously try and explain what an orator has said, only the orator can explain himself. Obama is ready to lead and has the experience to prove it:

- Was a grassroots community organizer in Chicago beginning in l985, where he became a community organizer with a church-based group seeking to improve living conditions in poor neighborhoods plagued with crime and high unemployment.

- Attended Harvard and was president of the Harvard Law Review.

- Project VOTE organizer in 1992, where 120,000 new voters were registered.

- Worked as a Civil Rights Attorney, fighting for the rights of everyone.

- Lectured on Constitutional Law at the University of Chicago (for ten Years).

- Elected to the Illinois State Senate in 1994 (served eight years).

- Elected to the US Senate in 2004.

- Was one of few elected officials (Illinois State Senator) who publicly and courageously spoke out (before the Iraq war began); in opposition to the presidential preemptive war powers and the plan to attack Iraq.

The Clinton campaign is built to divide and detour and conquer, with personal attacks, innuendos and untruths, rather than debating the issues and differences and advantages that may exist. What really bothers me is that the Clintons don't seem to care that their tactics are divisive and detrimental to race relations, well so much for the Clinton’s love of America, race relations and unity, they have proven themselves to be dividers, and the debris of this lands this month during the celebration of Martin Luther Kings celebration month and amidst the pictures on TV of white supremacist walking around in Jena Louisiana with lynches in their hands, yes this day in over 40 years from the Civil Right movement, January 21, 2008.

Hillary has voted wrong on the war and several different bills, Bill Clinton brought us NAFTA which has caused Americans hundreds of thousands of jobs and is threatening to destroy the middle class. Obama is ready, he has the foresight and knows how to make the right choices for America, Obama is a uniter and can successfully negotiate across the aisles, boarders and oceans of the world, Obama is the one.

Kim   January 21st, 2008 10:45 pm ET

What is going on with the Bill and Hillary???? Can we stick to facts and stop attacking others with smoking mirrors?

And why do we have two Clintons running for office? Maybe someone needs to tell Bill he is not running for the presidency.

jerry   January 21st, 2008 10:44 pm ET

Hillary was thoughtful, poised, and had great listening skills (did you notice practically all the time she would turn towards Obama or Edwards as they spoke and looked them directly in the eye, as they would look down, or away as she spoke).

Go Hillary.

Barack turned me off tonight. Edwards did make a lot of sense in the poverty argument, could make a good VP (although I am a bigger fan
of Bill Richardson who seems to be the least polarizing and most experienced choice.)

Rob---CO   January 21st, 2008 10:42 pm ET

Barack most decidedly will win S.C. , check the polls. I very much want Obama to win the presidency. Interesting paradox, though how can he give such an inspirational speech after winning Iowa, and then totally back-pedaling in his responses tonight. Hopefully Obama learns from tonight's debate and debates more persuasively in the head-to-head. Obama prez, Edwards vp.

Mauri   January 21st, 2008 10:41 pm ET

Tonight, we saw the making of a Madam President! She may have gotten boo-ed, but by the time the debate ended, every one knew who was telling the truth - and you know, sometimes the truth hurts. After tonight's debate, there should be no doubt about who can beat the Republicans, and we feel so much better about the presidential race now.

Thanks, CNN.

Linda   January 21st, 2008 10:41 pm ET

Obama for change! We don't want a re-run of the old politics with the Clintons. Obama wins!

Susan, MI   January 21st, 2008 10:40 pm ET

Um...Hello, CNN. Hillary Clinton has won a caucus and a primary; Obama has won one caucus. Additionally, Michigan's delegates–or at least a percentage of them–may still be heard at the Democratic convention. And she won MI, too. (By the way, there are a lot of voters in MI who, after Obama and Edwards signed affidavits to take their names off in order to curry favor with voters in Iowa and New Hampshire, will not vote for either of them if nominated).

CNN, you are trashy. You purposely asked questions that would result in a Jerry Springer-like event. You strayed from issues and asked questions that were not relevant and, as result, you did a disservice to the people of South Carolina. You are the Brittany Spears of news broadcasting. Sooner or later, your unprofessional antics and blatant biasness will undermine your position in news broadcasting.

Susan-VA   January 21st, 2008 10:33 pm ET

The Clintons are so full of themselves. We do not need another Clinton administration full of nothing but SCANDALS and dishonesty!!! Get real!! We need someone who will unite the country, not divide it further!

Obama for Predsident   January 21st, 2008 10:29 pm ET

Obama is definitely the front runner, that is why Clinton is spending all of her time trying to discredit him instead of focusing on what she plans on doing in the white house.

Blaine   January 21st, 2008 10:24 pm ET

I think that John Edwards looked really good tonight, because Hillary and Obama just kept squabbling.

Obama needs to stay above that mess that Hillary is trying to pull him into. Please Obama let her look bad on her own.

Beth   January 21st, 2008 10:23 pm ET

Obama got creamed!!He thought by coming in attacking clinton and edwards would work...He looked defensive and arrogant...Remember Obama tonight threw out the first personal attack..

Thomas   January 21st, 2008 10:22 pm ET

Obama is not the forerunner. He is a rhetorician. He does not provide direct answers to questions and he usually just provides "anticipated" safe language in his conversations. Further, as an African-American male, I DO NOT believe that fellow members of my race should vote for Obama just because he is black. He has to prove his experience. And in my opinion and according to his record, he lacks the experience and the wisdom to be President.

Marla   January 21st, 2008 10:22 pm ET

If Barack Obama is truly serious about doing what is best for America, he will realize that it is not his time. As said before, if he is flustered by Hillary and John's remarks, what will he do against the Republican hate machine? He needs to do some soul searching and realize he will do America more justice by not splitting up the Democratic party. Take that positive energy and apply it to a united front towards electing Hillary. There is nothing the Republicans can attack her on that she hasn't been through before. Obama is too new and too vulnerable to their lies and smear campaigning tactics. This is our last chance folks to get things straight!

brian singleton Michigan   January 21st, 2008 10:19 pm ET

Can someone PLEASE!! explain to me how everyone thinks hillary has the most experience???? (is it because she was sleeping with the pres?) no seriously, I believe they are or were lawyers then senators... what extra posision does she hold... no pun intended

Gary   January 21st, 2008 10:18 pm ET

Obama is so illogical, grasping for words all the time. Very inexperienced!

He went to the office not voting or having a stand on issues, voted for just being present. This shows how he is inexperienced and not committed to issues. He needs to stand on alot of issues, he needs experiences!

Hillary Clinton is a true leader, unafraid to take issues and risk. Go Hillary!

Carter   January 21st, 2008 10:16 pm ET

Bill, I agree that Obama IS the FRONTRUNNER!!! Go Obama!! As an African American candidate, he has to be particularly careful about his TONE, rhetoric, actions, and facial expressions! He is deliberate in not being too confrontational, but he IS very effective in answering questions and defending his points.

SC Dem   January 21st, 2008 10:16 pm ET

Democrats need to support a candidate who can win in November! Divisiveness will destroy the hope of making fundamental, crucial change in this country.

Mark   January 21st, 2008 10:15 pm ET

I guess we all forgot Clinton's Lame adminstration! The only people he helped was himself! I think that Edwards does not get the attention he deserves. I'm voting for the GOP!! I'm sick of the Democrats in-fighting, like always, I was looking forward to the CHANGE but it's just more of the same, did we all forget how Bil Clinton got the name SLICK WILLIE, he's doing it again this time his puppet is HILLIARY. I'm SICK OF THE CLINTON'S and the DEMOCRAT's, they are taking race relations back 50 years. GO McCain!!!!

Nahan   January 21st, 2008 10:14 pm ET

Marky that what we don't need. More swift boat tactics. Man can we get past that crap. Maybe Obama can.

Morgan   January 21st, 2008 10:13 pm ET

They Edwards and Clinton...pounded Obama, which was very good for him. Edwards really needs to just go away. Its pretty clear he is a pawn. As far as the entire debate it just solidifies my support for Obama. He took a pounding, he didn't look good all the time but who does? That's what makes him my choice, You probably won't hear him crying to the media about being ganged up on like Hillary and Bill Clinton did.

Carter   January 21st, 2008 10:13 pm ET

Bill, I agree that Obama IS the FRONTRUNNER!!! Go Obama!! As an African American candidate, he has to be particularly careful about his TONE, rhetoric, actions, and facial expressions! He is deliberate in not being too confrontational, but he IS very effective in answering questions and defending his points.

Susan   January 21st, 2008 10:13 pm ET

Great idea - Clinton/Edwards 08

nathan   January 21st, 2008 10:12 pm ET

Same old politics by Hillary. Bill was great at that crap. And Hillary is of the same mold. Man I hated it during the Bush/Kerry election and here we go again.

Temple   January 21st, 2008 10:11 pm ET

Why is CNN favoring Obama and not digging into the real issues with him??

Dennis   January 21st, 2008 10:10 pm ET

Obama did a great gob explaining himself and I think he will be the stronger candidate for president.

Nathan, Melbourne, Victoria   January 21st, 2008 10:10 pm ET

Is anyone getting sick of Obama's stutter? People say he's articulate. Can you imagine JFK.... Ask n..n..not wh...wh....what you. ca...ca can do for yo...your country. Obama will get wiped by any Republican except for Hickabee, I mean Huckabee. So naive Barack, they say he's the black candidate, but I reackon he's the green candidate. Not up to it.

Temple   January 21st, 2008 10:09 pm ET

Obama is too sure of himself and is not experienced enough to be President of USA

Roy   January 21st, 2008 10:08 pm ET

Well ... It just goes to show ... That it takes a Clinton and an Edwards beat the best ... Yes all you Clinton/Edwards supporters .... Its Obama .....

Fayth   January 21st, 2008 10:08 pm ET

Go Hillary.....
I for one miss the 90's.. and my house making me money.. Im sure America will wake up before Feb 5th and do whats right... She will Break the ceiling for all American's to run in 2016...

kuhrdan1   January 21st, 2008 10:06 pm ET

Senator Obama obfuscates behind rhetoric. He is blathering in generalities. But oh if a woman is capable of being agressive and states in clear, precise terms, such responses is viewed with negativity. And if one's memory is bit more accurate, it was Senator Obama who started dishing it by referencing President Clinton, as an ever so negative reference, in his repsonses. It sexism at its best and I am speaking from a male perspective.

Marie   January 21st, 2008 10:06 pm ET

Did Obama answer any question? Every chance he gets he repeats his speech. He is NOT ready for prime-time. another disaster in the making. and I am not voting for any of them.

Paul   January 21st, 2008 10:05 pm ET

Keshia, i think you've been drinking too much coolade....Hillary may lose So. Carolina *yawn*, but it's all about Super Tuesday sweetheart...New York, New Jersey, Cal, and on and on...GAME OVER...CLINTON WINS!!! YOU DO THE MATH!!!
PEACE FROM WASHINGTON, D.C.

Betsy Wells   January 21st, 2008 10:04 pm ET

The news media has ordained Obama as the candidate–not the voters of America. I'm tired of the extraordinary attention given to Clinton & Obama by the news commentators. John Edwards should be our Presidential candidate because of his passion to solve the problems within America

rosy   January 21st, 2008 10:04 pm ET

obama.. can't talk... he just mumbles... Hillary talks.. she is the one on top... what are you talking about..

Sarabia   January 21st, 2008 10:03 pm ET

Is clear that Obama still reaching to "changes" he doesn't know how to implement, Edwards has been very articulate and composed, but Hillary, might be the only candidate able to win the presidential race. One more point, is bad to try to use MLK as a base to win afro-american votes, if you want equality quit talking about race.

Ed   January 21st, 2008 10:03 pm ET

Is John Edwards scoring points with anyone tonight?

diana   January 21st, 2008 10:02 pm ET

i just do not see obama as the frontrunner. i see him as a bully and very defensive. he must win this debate, its crucial for him. obama's record for not doing well in the debates is well known.

hillary speaks experience and is presidential. hillary clearly has won the debate.

unidos con hillary

Rsbd11474   January 21st, 2008 10:02 pm ET

Will somebody please tell me how and what Barach Obama has done to run for President? I know of not one significant thing that he can lay claim to.
All I hear is that he is for change, Change what and please tell me how he plans to Change anything. Where are his political cohorts on both sides of the aisle?
He is so inexperienced it is ridiculous. He is an empty suit.

Venus   January 21st, 2008 10:02 pm ET

Obama was thoughtful and intelligently answered questions as well as barbs that have been thrown at him thoughout the week. He's an intellectual. He pauses because he actually THINKS before he speaks. For those of you who missed it, he answered re: the "present" votes, rewind your TiVo.

Think hard before you throw away your vote for HRC. Many don't want a defacto third term for Bill and they are incredibly divisive. Just remember who lied to the American people under oath. Once a liar, always a liar. It will rear it's ugly head and you can say hello to president mccain.

Curmilus Dancy II   January 21st, 2008 10:01 pm ET

I feel that the number one problem is that many folks are not used to a black man being able to speak up without having an attitude. It never seems to amaze me how some are quick to say that the black man has to be angry when he gets aggressive.

I feel that Obama is handling his own and trying to be as professional as he possibly can.

I want to know how anyone can be the most experienced when neither has held the position of President?

emmanuel   January 21st, 2008 10:01 pm ET

This is the point. I think Barrack came out to early. He is too immature to face up to the republicans. He will certainly crumble. He ought to have waited, won a re-election prior to embarking on this presidential bid. We cannot afford another republican

DeVonne   January 21st, 2008 10:01 pm ET

Come on SC! Rise up! Don't go backwards! It's a new day. Obama!! The other two folks on stage know the truth!

queen   January 21st, 2008 10:01 pm ET

Hilary brags about her 35 years, so why are we in the shape we're in. And another thing, why is Hilary and John trying to play they have made great changes. Aren't you guys looking at the present and how we got there. It doesn't work....I think some of you guys are so complex that you can't see the simple and common sense things.

neetabug   January 21st, 2008 10:01 pm ET

Bill how wrong you are Hillary is holding her own

Our net president of the United States

Connie   January 21st, 2008 10:01 pm ET

Obama is being repeatedly attacked by Clinton. She's so annoying. She keeps talking about Obama's record, what about her record?

John Reynolds   January 21st, 2008 10:00 pm ET

Will somebody please pull the Hillary thesis out of Wesley College and let her socialist aims be aired before the whole nation starting with "I WILL REDISTRIBUTE THE WEALTH OF THIS NATION!!!" You can bet your sweet ass that Saul Alinski and Marc Tucker will be at the core of her advisors cadre. Who is Marc Tucker? Those of you who are farmiliar with the Brtitish "11 Plus" exam will shudder that this terrible program is spreading to the USA.

Guy   January 21st, 2008 10:00 pm ET

Obama is not my front runner either. He has yet to take a stand and speak of what he is going to do as president. What is he running for? What does he stand for? No one knows because he hasn't said anything definitive. I also think he waffles back and forth – just like he does as a senator. People need to pay attention to what the candidates are saying and not just go with them because of race or gender or because they "like" a person. Let's pick the person who is going to change the country. Hillary has the experience – neither John or Barack have the experience. Let their records speak for themselves.

Al   January 21st, 2008 10:00 pm ET

Hillary old school politics, Obama's nnot good night, Edwards too late but good insights. Still to much bickering by Hillary. Let's get more solutions with bankrupting the nation. Obama will take us into the next best direction witout fear. I am voting for him here in NYS!!

From Illinois   January 21st, 2008 9:59 pm ET

Obama is clearly not the winner. Sad that this had to turn into a cat fight. Obama clearly was rattled. He displayed he does not have answers to the tough questions and folds under attack. Hillary and Edwards all the way!

Tim   January 21st, 2008 9:59 pm ET

im sorry this was not an open venue............ good luck to al of us

Mona   January 21st, 2008 9:58 pm ET

Barack is visibly not holding his own. He is getting flustered. I am from Illinois. i don't see anything outstanding done for us by Barack Obama. We are losing jobs. Homes are not being sold. People are losing their homes and healthcare. here. Why vote for him? Hillary-Edwards would be a good team or maybe Hillary-Obama too.You have to have some experience.

LadyAfrica   January 21st, 2008 9:58 pm ET

IObama is seen as sufficiently threatening that every attempt to discredit him will be tried. It is showing clearly tonight and daily.

celestina sovine   January 21st, 2008 9:58 pm ET

hillary is the only one who can get the economy back on track .and thats what we are going to need in nov.not the war but the economy.or we are going to be a second rate power in four years .with nothing but a bunch of nuclear weapons ike pakistan.its the economy again people.get your heads out of the sand.

Rsbd11474   January 21st, 2008 9:57 pm ET

Hillary is the front runner, she makes Barach and John look like bumbling idiots.

Janet Reiss   January 21st, 2008 9:56 pm ET

Obama is not the frontrunner. Even the audiences receptive applause for Hillary stood out. She just may be the second black president. I love it!

C Tatum,Michigan   January 21st, 2008 9:56 pm ET

This guy will be President, Obama is the only one that can take on the Republican Party. Go Obama

Audrey   January 21st, 2008 9:55 pm ET

I am not an American but a Canadian. Senator Obama in this debate is demonstrating good sound judgement. If I was an American, I would vote for him because he keeps his cool, I haven't noticed him being shaky at all. Senator Obama is grass roots and I admire how fast he has moved up the political scale.
He is so intelligent on all the issues and can hold his own to any one.
One last thing, isn't it time for a change? Some have stayed too long at the fair.
Give others a chance. Fresh faces, Fresh ideas.

Janet Reiss   January 21st, 2008 9:54 pm ET

I think that Hillary has held her own throughout the debate. I would give her the debate tonight. She is bright and informed. Obama is bumbling. Edwards is too quiet. I vote for Hillary!

BobbyBoy   January 21st, 2008 9:54 pm ET

Obama is not looking his best. However he does have to protect himself from Hillary's attacks. But when he gets a chance he has if not gained any ground he hasn't lost any (so far).

dana   January 21st, 2008 9:53 pm ET

Interesting, during the timed debate, my boyfriend and I took the times each candidate was given before they were initially prodded to stop talking and when they actually did. Here are the results for the totals:

Edwards
Blitzer told him to stop at 8minutes and 50seconds and he stopped after 14minutes and five seconds.
Clinton
Blitzer told her to stop at 16minutes and 35seconds and she stopped after 17 minutes and 75seconds.
Obama
Blitzer told him to stop at 18minutes and 35 seconds and he stopped after 21minutes and 50seconds.

Edwards isn't getting a chance but he is still dominating the debate.

Jason   January 21st, 2008 9:52 pm ET

Let's really look at this, Barack has caused Hilary to change the way she has run her campaign and her talk. I like the fact that he pauses because it shows that he is giving well though out answers. The media has pumped the race card bigger than it should be by indirectly mentioning it! Barack may or may not be the current front runner but he is undoubtedly the most solid presidential candidate for the current issues that face America -

Michelet   January 21st, 2008 9:52 pm ET

It was not long ago, that the pundits in the media were asking Oama to attack Hillary. They were saying : take the gloves, Obama. Then He started to attack . When the Clintons fight... Well the same media is talking the nastiness of the Clintons. Do they have to tie their hands behind their back? I think if Oama Obama cannot take the heat he should get out of the kitchen. As a Black Naturalized american I think CLinton has been to the point in raising the right question. If Obama must be pampered, may the media provide his diaper and his baby bottle.

Cathy   January 21st, 2008 9:51 pm ET

What about Michelle Obama's comment on behalf og Barack – "Ain't no black people in Iowa." This in regards to his win in Iowa. Is that what she will say if he wereto win in South Carolina. I don't hear comments like this from Bill clinton or Elizabeth Edwards. Tonight Barack seems totally off. He does not appear a front runner tonight.

celestina sovine   January 21st, 2008 9:51 pm ET

if you want a republican as the next president get obama the democratic nomination.because the silent majority will make sure that happens.

Freestyle Pete   January 21st, 2008 9:51 pm ET

Its about time that Obama's misrepresantions of his past political career is brought to light by the big media. As Bill said "He is living in a fantasy world."

floyd   January 21st, 2008 9:50 pm ET

Clinton, Obama, Edwards...what a three ring circus. None of them has the personal character to hold the office. In this debate if you used the term "Loser" you'd have to get more specific.

Debbie   January 21st, 2008 9:50 pm ET

It is hard to sit and listen to Hillary claim she is for a civil campaign when she is doing just the opposite. Barack is running against the Clintons, so I ask the questions "What is Hillary's going to do when in the Whitehouse?' Is she going to be the co-president with Bill because this is how she is running her race.

It appears that it is more important for Bill Clinton to serve his third term as President of the United States and she is running on his behalf. Just as a Senator or Congressman spouses takes their seat when they die. This is not a free pass to the Whitehouse.

It leaves to question who is really going to be the President if she is elected, Bill or Hillary?

It is time to stop the Bush/Clinton/Bush/--– Dynasty.

Marwan EL Kordy   January 21st, 2008 9:50 pm ET

LOL, Edwards has lost is VP ticket with OBAMA for sure! Too bad, John is now officially the "Spoiler". I think this debate will help him, but in the end he will end up spoiling it if he doesn't drop, and sure enough, If Clinton is elected, we might as well start calling McCain "President Elect"

jones   January 21st, 2008 9:49 pm ET

Obama is not my front runner! I think that Edwards and Hillary are realistic and on target!!! Go Hillary!

john, NJ   January 21st, 2008 9:48 pm ET

Bill Snyder you are full of it

Murry   January 21st, 2008 9:47 pm ET

Barack is holding his own. He's keeping his cool. He's putting careful thought into his answers. He's giving an honest answer. America does not need a bureaucrat or a micromanager. There's plenty of those out there. America needs a leader with vision. America needs a leader who can unite us and build bridges.

jmel   January 21st, 2008 9:47 pm ET

Is Schneider watching the same debate that the rest of us are? Obama is not clear and decisive and is, as others have said, "off his game". His comment on healthcare, "we have to involve the American people in this decision" shows how much of a policital neophyte he really is. The three candidates cant even agree so how does he think he is going to corral the interests of 300 million Americans. While its true that each candidate has both strengths and weaknesses, my money is not on Obama or Edwards – Clinton has the experience and fire to make things happen.

evelyn   January 21st, 2008 9:46 pm ET

It is about time Edwars is showing his strength. And Obams is still getting the most time to speak and respond. Obama gets a pass on almost all of the issues. He still has not clarified what his "CHANGE is going to be and how he will bring it about. He also need to get tougher because if he cannot handle what is being said about his voting records etc he will really be shell shocked when the Republicans get to debate hime if he is the nominee, So we will thenbe seeing another 4 years of Republican Politics.

Karla   January 21st, 2008 9:46 pm ET

I don't see it like you do. I find the three candidates being themselves.
In the debate, one sees Edwards and Obama respecting personal integrity. So Edwards agreed with Clinton sometimes and Obama sometimes. Ditto with Obama. One sees the Clintonesque politics of convenience when it comes to reasoning.

The debate is reminding me of how costly the distractions have been in the past Clinton Presidential era. This campaign period has convinced me that I am not wrong in betting that another Clinton presidency will be as costly because of distractions.

Fortunately, there is an Obama and an Edward. The country or a political party or future presidential staff need not rely on a leadership that has the baggage and costliness of Clintonesque distractions.

sandra   January 21st, 2008 9:46 pm ET

Clinton needs to pick Edwards for her VP

celestina sovine   January 21st, 2008 9:45 pm ET

i heard that obamas church is only for blacks . is this true ? and that thier first priority is to the african continent.the church is called the trinity church of christ.if this is true why hasn't the media picked up on this /

Karin   January 21st, 2008 9:45 pm ET

Eric, America will no longer be a free country if the Clintons win. Remember, they owe a debt of gratitude to Saudi Arabia – who gave the Clinton Library and Foundation $10M – because foreigners are not allowed to donate in the campaign – this among others. With the US asking help from the Middle East and China to bail them out of the mortgage crisis, Hillary admitted that she will not stand in the way of foreign banks having ownership of American banks.

I hope that America wakes up. The conjugal dictatorship of the Clintons is surely the best way to bring the mightiest superpower down. I'd rather see the eulogy of the Clinton's political death rather than see America down.

Alex A.   January 21st, 2008 9:45 pm ET

It appears to me that Clinton is viewing Obama more and more as a threat every day, so she feels the need to attack and question Obama. Edwards on the other hand has his campaign slipping away from him and needed a policy change, so he has decided to go after Obama. It just seems to me like this debate is more evidence that Obama is the front runner in South Carolina.

GO OBAMA!!

Barb   January 21st, 2008 9:43 pm ET

Nik T, i couldn't agree with you more. The media are giving him a pass!

Woody   January 21st, 2008 9:42 pm ET

The light to American dream become brighter each time Obama speak!!!!

Renee   January 21st, 2008 9:42 pm ET

Are we watching the same debate?

Obama is not answering a question. You must actually be believeing his rehertoric.

E.H   January 21st, 2008 9:42 pm ET

Hillary Clinton is the only person there that has the brains and quality as a great person I would like to win and I know in my heart SHE WILL!!!!!!!

susan   January 21st, 2008 9:41 pm ET

there is absolutely no one who can touch hillary's grace of expression, intelligence, depth of background and incredible intellect....there is NO comparison here. the media can twist things as they wish, but THIS is fact. she is the one with the experience to lead this country out of the chaos it has sunk into during king george's reign.

Leah   January 21st, 2008 9:40 pm ET

OBAMA WON THIS DEBATE!!!!!!!

Yolanda Diaz   January 21st, 2008 9:40 pm ET

Not so Hillary is the one

Joan C.   January 21st, 2008 9:40 pm ET

I grow weary of Edwards at the pulpit. Clearly, he is not going to win the election, when is he going to drop out?

David   January 21st, 2008 9:38 pm ET

Just because he is a great public speaker doesn't make him a great leader and that would be Obama!

Woody   January 21st, 2008 9:38 pm ET

Obama hit the mark by saying unite American!!!

Wes   January 21st, 2008 9:38 pm ET

If Obama wins just think about Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson moving into the White House too.

rick   January 21st, 2008 9:38 pm ET

I think John Edwards has looked the most level headed and sharp tomight. I hope he can rally in the FL primary.

David   January 21st, 2008 9:36 pm ET

Is anyone even paying attention to the one person who actually has a point to whqt he is saying? John Edwards!!!!!!!!! Listen people please listne to what he is saying. He is our best candidate to turn it around!

Sherlando Blaise   January 21st, 2008 9:35 pm ET

I simply have to disagree.I think that Obama is holding his own in an excellent manner.It is clear that his being attacked from both sides but he is facing them head on and doing a good job of breaking them down.He's being direct and truthful.Anyone who is looking at this debate objectively would have to give Obama his just due.

Rob   January 21st, 2008 9:35 pm ET

Yeah Jack,

He's really unifying all the races... and I'm the tooth fairy.

Edd of LA   January 21st, 2008 9:34 pm ET

I have nothing against Obama, very smart man. But you have to elect a leader who is ready from Day 1. Hillary is the most experienced among the three. Nothing beats experience and Hillary has it!

lee   January 21st, 2008 9:34 pm ET

Their playing nice now

herm   January 21st, 2008 9:33 pm ET

I'm not sure that any of them really understand issue number one (economics), but it seems that Edwards is the smoothest of the lawyer lot. He's definitly taking advantage of their cat-fight.

catmarshall   January 21st, 2008 9:33 pm ET

Obama is strong but Hillary's experience is showing.

LawStudentinAZ   January 21st, 2008 9:32 pm ET

COME ON!!! Could CNN please ask some substantive questions...."was Bill Clinton the first black president?" Are you serious? This is ridiculous and certainly not a "debate" worth watching.

sandy Il.   January 21st, 2008 9:30 pm ET

clinton is clearly scared of barack, the first thing she needs to do, is put a muzzle on her husband. then she needs to get some real experience.she lies alot. thats the only thing she learned from her husband. I only hope the people can see through her. she is courting the black people. what they cannot see is she is telling them whatever they want to here just for their vote. she will never follow up on any promise she makes. sandy Il.

Maurice   January 21st, 2008 9:30 pm ET

Even if Obama doesn't win the democratic nomination, at least his presence has shined light on the plight of African Americans. The true benefit will be if these issues aren't pushed to the side in the next presidential election.

Janice T.   January 21st, 2008 9:30 pm ET

Obama is NOT the frontrunner. The women in SC should not be underestimated to vote on race before their gender. The women in this country have the power to really change the landscape in Washington!

Jack   January 21st, 2008 9:29 pm ET

Obama is on his strongest point right now............speaking about unifying all the races of the country.

Pastor   January 21st, 2008 9:28 pm ET

Hillary and Edwards are absoutely unpleansant on the platform. Obama is holding his cool and is very sure of himself. I cannot believe how mean people are and the fact that they are afraid of him. I am praying for him because I know the only way for him to become the president God has to be the one to put him there and no matter how anyone feels about him God can do it. Also, Obama is not a black man, he is black, and white.

Ask yourself the question, if he is not suitable for the job of president why are the Clintons and Edwards waisting time attacking? No, they want the black votes and really want black people to go against Obama. How sad when he is for all people regardless of their color.

Sharifa   January 21st, 2008 9:28 pm ET

Okay, Obama is relaxing. Go Obama 08'

Marcia, AZ   January 21st, 2008 9:27 pm ET

Obama is showing his discomfort with answering to specifics...still no real answer from him on the holes in his argument...his answer on ending the Iraq conflict...'we'll have to wait and see what Bush does'! Take a stand on something...anything! Blah, blah, blah...lot's of words...no real meaning. The Iraqi government is going to have to have their feet held to the fire...sink or swim...as far as I'm concerned our military has already won that war and the combat troops cannot continue to be held accountable for failed politics on either side.

Sharifa   January 21st, 2008 9:27 pm ET

He simply organizes his thoughts together. "thinks before he speaks" or searching for the right words. It's okay to me.

Bill, Covington,LA   January 21st, 2008 9:27 pm ET

Drew, I have watched CNN (clinton news network) for years. They have always been a joke. Most of them appear to model themselves after that looser Dan Blather, and his famous phony "news" stories, of which there are many. I predict CNN will NOT pick the next president. Have them poll me and again I'll lie to the polster, that's always good for a laugh.
Take a long hard look at Mitt Romney / Duncan Hunter, then go vote.

Tia   January 21st, 2008 9:26 pm ET

Edwards is lame. He needs to make up his mind about who's side he is on. First its Obama...now he is teaming up with Clinton. Make up your mind. Also Bill and Hillary need to get a life. The cheap shots and lies on Obama is childish and makes me sick. Edwards is a hypocrite with his $500 dollar haircuts and is lame jokes on this debate. Either way I agree with Schneider

Kamilah   January 21st, 2008 9:26 pm ET

You are correct. Obama is the front runner and tonight he has shown that he is not a push over and has been given an opportunity to put his successes in Illinois for the nation to observe. He started to discuss his bill on racial profiling that was passed in Illinios, but was interrupted by Edwards. I hope that racial profiling is one of the upcoming questions as well as education reform.

kate   January 21st, 2008 9:26 pm ET

Let's look at John Edwards, intelligent, articulate, and honorable. It's hard to understand why he is not the front runner

Patsy   January 21st, 2008 9:26 pm ET

I'm tired of Shrill & Bill already! And I'm a left-wing woman! And I used to LOVE those two....but they're both showing their true colors.....and they clash!
Obama all the way!

T Mitchell, Michigan   January 21st, 2008 9:25 pm ET

Obama is on top! This definitely shows he is the choice of the party.

marky   January 21st, 2008 9:25 pm ET

If Barack becomes the nominee he needs to go to debate boot camp. The republican haters and mudslingers will swiftboat and sink him if he does not improve. The surprise tonight is Edwards. I had written him off this weekend. Time to reconsider.

Sharifa   January 21st, 2008 9:25 pm ET

Obama naturally talks that way.

lee   January 21st, 2008 9:25 pm ET

Your right Daniel...

I had a large amount of respect for the Clintons until now.

I am a independent and I believe that Obama has run a ethical race

That means alot to me based on all the crooked politics and elections that we have witnessed throughout the years

Hillary needs to stand on her own legs and show that she does not need Bill in order to be a competent president.

Untill she does that I will never vote for her

Sharifa   January 21st, 2008 9:24 pm ET

Hey Hillary didn't answer the question. She is talking about herself again.
Question : How African Americans should vote when electing an African American?

Senior VA Citizen   January 21st, 2008 9:24 pm ET

Edwards and Clinton have never been on the ground fighting for the economic and political rights of poor people, black or white. There is no way she will be about the change we need for peace or economically..

Scott Buchanan   January 21st, 2008 9:24 pm ET

Bill,

Wolf needs to recognize when a candidate is merely monopolizing the mike. If he waits for Sen. Clinton to stop talking, she'll be speaking all night. it is horribly unfair to let her go on and on until she's touched all her talking points with each answer. Giving Sen. Obama "30 seconds" to respond to five minutes of mischaracterizations and distortions isn't fair.

These are great questions. It would nice if he would be more insistent that they answer them. Thank you for sponsoring this important event.

Scott

p.s. Here she goes again.

Boogie Los Angeles CA   January 21st, 2008 9:24 pm ET

just remember people...when the candidate is chosen...they will ALL shake hands, support their candidate and take on the Republicans.
This is the sport of politics.

If Hillary loses...I will of coarse vote for Obama or, Edwards...right now...they are the ones I'm rooting against.

But, the BIG picture here is that when it comes time to elect a president who will be picking our supreme court justices next term...I DO NOT WANT IT TO BE A REPUBLICAN.
You think you don't like Hillary?...what happens when the neo-cons try to turn America in to a censored Christian Disneyland?
Say goodbye to womens rights...say goodbye to free speech...Say goodbye to the middle class!

Fight for your candidate...but, rember...once we leave the boxing ring...we shake hands and live to fight bigger battles. :)

Keshia   January 21st, 2008 9:24 pm ET

Obama is the frontrunner and our next president. He has every right to defend himselves against the Clintons. Its obvious that Hilary and Bill feel threaten by Obama and are TRYING to do anything to defame is views. They must realize that they are not owed the White House. You must earn it!

Todd   January 21st, 2008 9:24 pm ET

Sorry – but I think HIllary's criticsm is warranted. She really wants the American people to get past the fluff. Her remarks are like Dorthy from The Wizard of Oz, pulling back the curtain to revel a meek mannered man, instead of the talking head or what was presumed to be OZ the great and Terrible. Obama is nothing more then rhetoric. IT clearly shows tonight.

Amy   January 21st, 2008 9:24 pm ET

I am from Myrtle Beach and am so proud to see the Democratic debate in my home city tonight. I am also proud to see the people in my state coming together and supporting the candidate who will most effectively help them and the nation as a whole to CHANGE for the better. Obama is handling himself beautifully up against a woman whose objective has become to slander, and another man who's fighting his hardest to remain in the race.

Terrance   January 21st, 2008 9:23 pm ET

Obama is doing fine. He knew it would come to this. The only way either of them can win this thing is to try to Beat (Obama) him up!!!! Stick to your guns Obama, this too shall pass.

Craig E   January 21st, 2008 9:23 pm ET

I think Obama is the frontrunner, and he is doing a great job. It seems that he is indeed running against 3 strong people:

HIllary, Bill an John.

You Go Barack!!

Grant   January 21st, 2008 9:22 pm ET

Also Obama doesn't have much dirt to dig up on him, 'Rezko' is the best they can find? LOL.. and then there are those stupid emails.. and it is true, we know so much stuff about Hillary because her husband was in the white house for a couple terms..

Carol   January 21st, 2008 9:22 pm ET

I agree with Nik from Texas. Obama has been treated with very special care by the media. He is not held accountable for his comments and he has not been required to respond to criticism from the other candidates. I think experience DOES matter and I am terribly concerned that the media has not made Obama prove that his 'judgement' is an acceptable and suitable replacement for experience.

joe   January 21st, 2008 9:22 pm ET

Im a democrat and if the nominee is not clinton, i will be republican.

j.l.   January 21st, 2008 9:20 pm ET

To all those saying Obama doesn't have enough experience. Talk about the pot calling the kettle black. Hillary has been Senator for a few years, and First Lady for 8... how's that SO MUCH MORE EXPERIENCE?

Answer that!

Grant   January 21st, 2008 9:20 pm ET

Exactly, and also the whole planned parenthood deal, which I was suprised he didn't bring up, but it might have been too complicated for HIlary, calling Obama a flip flopper! LOOK WHO IS TALKING!

George   January 21st, 2008 9:20 pm ET

why are we white and black we should be all noted as "americans"

Dee   January 21st, 2008 9:20 pm ET

Maria, where you not listening to the debate or you have nothing better to say? He answered the question by saying that "present" is the vote you give when you, when you a question a technicality in the bill at hand. Pay attention dear

Jymnast79   January 21st, 2008 9:20 pm ET

Obama NEVER answered his 133 votes on present... he was asked simply why did you vote that way.. and he never answered it...i want to know WHY present is better.. when you can vote no for it and fix it then..

b matthew   January 21st, 2008 9:20 pm ET

America and American voters are not going to change drastically over night. They have elected a conservative, Texas Republican to lead their nation two General Elections consecutively. Bringing the Reagan Democrats back into the fold, bringing the centrists (followers of Senators Sam Nunn, Olympia Snowe, and others, is vital to a Democratic victory. Time, experience, and the ability to rebound all point to the true "Past", "Present", and "Future" frontrunner, Senator Clinton. The appropriate strategy is the win the White House back first, then quibble amongst the winners. I strongly suggest that Democratic voters unite behind Senator Clinton, Americans, before President _________ of the Republicans extends their control to twelve years.

cg,ny   January 21st, 2008 9:20 pm ET

So what if they're ganging up on him? They've done that to Hillary for the last 3 debates and Mitt Romney got his on 4 sides during his. That's what this is partly for – to weed out those who can't take it and one thing you can say about Hillary it that she's taking a LOT and is still standing – If she were a man, you'd call that leadership. Becuase it's a woman, it's not right?
As for her healthcare attempts in the 90s, how many of you can't say you know more now than you did 15 years ago? As far as I know the only one who says he makes no mistakes is George Bush

Dennis   January 21st, 2008 9:20 pm ET

Obama is making me proud. It is about time he fought back.

mike   January 21st, 2008 9:20 pm ET

If Obama is the front runner like you indicate, he sure is not very good at handling it. He is very defensive. The media will have a field day with this guy if they ask the tough right questions.

will   January 21st, 2008 9:20 pm ET

Obama also hasnt jumped subjects like hillary on immagration and he hasnt been throwing as much dirt as has been thrown at him the last couple weeks with the whole Fox news thing

shawn tillman   January 21st, 2008 9:20 pm ET

I don't know if Sen. Obama is the front runner or not. But what I do believe that Sen. Clinton is not backing down from the fight and she is doing a great job of holding her own against sen. obama's attacks.

Sandy   January 21st, 2008 9:20 pm ET

I think that this debate shows what is being staged as two "old" Washington views criticizing the neophyte...........what's wrong with that freshness..........? And a debate shouldn't be "old hat" answers...........someone who thinks on the spot should show some emotion about what he says NOT cool and calm with a canned answer. Hillary's body language is disturbing....................talk about being coached!

...........anyway I'm a Republican..............but Obama looks the best to me!

James   January 21st, 2008 9:19 pm ET

I don't think Obama is the front runner. Edwards is doing very good tonight. Obama is not doing too good under pressure.

Bernie Mitchell   January 21st, 2008 9:19 pm ET

You can tell who the front runner is in South Carolina. Obama is in the uncomfortable position of having both Clinton and Edwards team up against him. I think both Edwards and Clintion are scoring points at Obama's expense. At times, Obama seems to be flustered and stutters–a rare event for for such an eloquent speaker.

David   January 21st, 2008 9:19 pm ET

I too have noticed that both Edwards and HRC are on the attack against Obama. Both are very aggressive in attacking and trying to "catch" Obama in a flip-flop position. For me i have only heard Obama have one position on all the major issues (healthcare, iraq etc). Man, if it's this heated in January, can you imagine what it'll be like in October!?

Erin   January 21st, 2008 9:19 pm ET

Voting in Illionis is different than voting the the U.S. Congress. He stated that he voted present because there was problems with the legislation presented that needed to be fixed. Pay attention.

Tina Hoots   January 21st, 2008 9:19 pm ET

If you are a Republican Mr. Obama pulled for you tonight! His tactic is to divide this party! He began the debate with attacks (not just this one, but those before and every sound bite to put others on the defensive). I really liked Mr. Obama, admired him, but tonight may prompt me to change my mind. I never thought I would hear myself say that!!!
I will not vote for a person who from the "get go" thinks to bully is to succeed.
Build a bridge! Do not divide our party Mr. Obama!
Issues not attacks!

Chris   January 21st, 2008 9:19 pm ET

Obama answered on why he voted present 133 times and remember it is on the state votes not federal 133 present out of 4000 votes. Hillary came across as an old time politacian attacking him on these issues as well as the working for a slum lord ( He answered that as well) She needs to continue to talk about the issues that she is passionate for and stop coming across as a pit bull

Sharifa   January 21st, 2008 9:19 pm ET

He did say why he voted present. You missed it. There is so much going on so I can understand why you missed it. Good Luck

j.l.   January 21st, 2008 9:19 pm ET

Maria...he said it about 3 times in the debate.

He said (not quoting –generalizing) because of a lot of internal stigmas which other wise he would have voted 'yes' or 'no. After he answered it by being attacked by Hillary, Edwards stepped in to 'chime' in about 5 minutes later. Then Obama repeated his answer again.

John   January 21st, 2008 9:19 pm ET

Honestly, knowing anyone of these candidates records is essential in making a well informed decision as to who should be voted into office. Calling foul at the process is may be evidence that it may not be time to run for president.

Marcy,Florida   January 21st, 2008 9:19 pm ET

If your interested in Obama's voting record while being in the Ill. Senate, ask your self why he voted present as many times since he has become Senator in Congress.

adam   January 21st, 2008 9:19 pm ET

"present" is also a way to say that the bill is partially acceptable but the voter would also like to modify that bill, often used Bi-partisanly

Dana   January 21st, 2008 9:19 pm ET

Don't feel it's two on one – it's a debate and Obama has been getting a pass on these debates. The other democratic candites are trying to get him to answer the question that is asked and rightly so. Does anyone really understand his position on anything? Doesn't matter what he says today – he'll change his mind tomorrow

michelle   January 21st, 2008 9:18 pm ET

obama may have been in the front but after this debate I sure hope he is not. I am from SC and I pray we don't vote for him. He is not answering questions and is going down fast. He is killing himself.

edward   January 21st, 2008 9:18 pm ET

If you remember Obama said the young people up to 25 would be covered under their parents so that would eliminate that.Each plan the candidates have will have holes in it no matter what.

Ken Hacker   January 21st, 2008 9:18 pm ET

Obama will soon look like an empty suit if he does not provide more details to his policies. Edwards did well challenging him on ending the war. The Obama consultants need to rethink the style over substance strategy. Voters want both and look for someone who has answers as well as hope.

Michael   January 21st, 2008 9:18 pm ET

Yeah, Obama has this terrible habit of thinking when he speaks. I wish he would just prewrite a soundbite-friendly blurb that can be used to "answer" any question. "Helping old Ladies across the street" anyone? No thanks. Give me a real answer.

James   January 21st, 2008 9:18 pm ET

He said he voted present because it wasnt something he opposed or supported. He opposeded parts of it and wanted them changed while supporting some parts and not of thers but not enough to make him vote either way.

And please, this is getting old. Barrack is the front runner in South Carolina and has erased Hilarys once huge lead nationally and has gained the most delegates in his last 2 losses. Hes not the frontrunner, but he certainly isnt in 2nd place.

Rob   January 21st, 2008 9:18 pm ET

Daniel,

And I'm the tooth-fairy...

Brad   January 21st, 2008 9:18 pm ET

Maria

He did answer. Its when you don't agree with a certain part of the legislation thats trying to get past.

Nick   January 21st, 2008 9:18 pm ET

Maria.. go and look at the by-laws for the Illinois house of representatives. Obama's "present" votes.. as he HAS said.. has been, in effect, a vote to continue debate. It's not a "No" or a "Yes" because he thinks the idea has some potential as long as it's debated on - and not sent to the circular file to have somebody start from scratch on the exact same issue. It's basically a time-saving measure. Congress is often criticzed for wasting time. "Present" votes like these are a way to combat wasted time and actually talk about the issues at hand.

Sun   January 21st, 2008 9:18 pm ET

Obama stands out as the most authentic and realistic candidate....I am so glad he is calling Hillary and Bill on their blatant lies!

patrice   January 21st, 2008 9:18 pm ET

I disagree about needing to hear "why" Barach voted present. We all can check each of the candidates records by going to the washingpost.com.

See for yourself and then you'll know what they voted against, why and whether what they say in the debates are true.

Lastly, let's not forget that this country isn't SOLEY run by the President. If it was, we would be considered governed by dictatorship. Not the case for the U.S.

Regardless of the agenda the president pushes, it HAS to be passed by Congress. So, pay close attention the your senate and house races in your area.

IT MAKES A DIFFERENCE!

Beverly   January 21st, 2008 9:18 pm ET

Oh stop the racism. Black people don't always vote for the black candidate. And by the way, Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson don't represent me either!

jyoti   January 21st, 2008 9:18 pm ET

Obama seems to have lost his mojo. I don't know wht Edwards is trying to achieve with his funny acts. While Clinton has an attitude of statesman(woman).

Dylan   January 21st, 2008 9:17 pm ET

Bill I could could not disagree with you more. Obama is not the frontrunner, he is the inexperienced novice, and Hillary Clinton and John Edwrds are just reminding us of that fact. They are showing America what the media isnt. Obama has no substance to his rhetoric and he is not prepared to be in the White House.

Curis   January 21st, 2008 9:17 pm ET

Sen.Clinton has apparently regained her Queen Of Mean tile

Mohammad, LA CA   January 21st, 2008 9:17 pm ET

Obama has a chance during the current break. Compose yourself and come back and fight. I would say the only way he can win this is if he lays on attacks on Hillary and brushes off those of Edwards. It'll cement Edward's position of irrellevancy and hopefully pit HIllary back on the defensive.

Go Obama you can do it lol.

But I can see how people are saying HIllary is winning, remember, its Obama who is suffering here..

Do not forget the debate Hillary lost a while back, where everyone complained about her! Why was that? Becaust it was a 2 on 1!!

s. brady   January 21st, 2008 9:17 pm ET

Barack has got to stop back peddling. On his sex offender bill…VOTE! everyone has a family member who has been sexually abused and it isn’t only girls. Stand up Obama and be a man!

Robert Taylor   January 21st, 2008 9:17 pm ET

Senator Clinton was so presidential on all issues. Senator Clinton is my choice for the nomination.

Julie, Binghamton, NY   January 21st, 2008 9:17 pm ET

Are you kidding me? Edwards was defending Clinton and himself from Barack's unfair accusations! What kind of spin is this on what is going on?

Walt   January 21st, 2008 9:17 pm ET

CLINTON IS DEFINETLY THE FRONTRUNNER. CNN IS TRYING DESPERATELY TO KNOCK HER DOWN AT EVERY TURN. They probably figure that Obama would be easier for the Rupublicans to beat.

michael   January 21st, 2008 9:17 pm ET

Tense and Uncomfortable... because it is frustrating when someone spins every statement and action that you make to their own advantage. Clinton certainly wasn't the picture of composure when their was a "Right Wing Conspiracy"

Brian   January 21st, 2008 9:17 pm ET

I think the reasons for that are twofold: (1) Yes, Obama is clearly the front runner in South Carolina. But, perhaps more importantly, (2) Edwards likely views Obama's front-runner status in SC is relatively new founded - meaning his potential voters just made up their minds. That means they might not be that firm in their support and Edwards needs to swipe those voters from Obama to remain viable in the longrun.

Tania   January 21st, 2008 9:17 pm ET

They're right! Obama dodges all the policy questions with eloquent rhetoric. He needs to be given a dose of reality!

SOUTHERNGIRL   January 21st, 2008 9:16 pm ET

bring it on, it's time for feathers to be ruffled,,,,,,during the past several debates Hillary has been ganged up on and faired well. It's time to see how well Barack can handle the heat.............

George   January 21st, 2008 9:16 pm ET

edwards is gone to hillary's vice

Marcia, Erie, Colorado   January 21st, 2008 9:16 pm ET

I thougjt Obama explained the present votes just fine. Don't let the others win by just SAYING he didn't answer! Too bad we're so conditioned against listening to any nuanced answers.

zellfire   January 21st, 2008 9:16 pm ET

Good. She's scared of him. Edwards wants to bring down either one so the nominee is in his debt- Edwards killed Deann for Kerry- he hopes it works 2wice

ed   January 21st, 2008 9:16 pm ET

edwards is running for v.p. consideration on the
clinton ticket

Michael   January 21st, 2008 9:16 pm ET

Maria:
He said he had "technical problems" on the bills. This is 100 votes out of 4000. That is about 2% of his total votes. There's parliamentary procedure to take into account as well. If you vote against a bill, you cannot ask that the question be reconsidered. "Present" is a vote that allows you to register your displeasure with the bill, but entitle you to bring it back up later for revision.

Hey, I didn't say it was simple. But that's the answer. It's technical and boring. Let's move on.

Joni Washington   January 21st, 2008 9:16 pm ET

Its about time! Sen. Obama is the one to beat and the unnecessary debate the other two candidates are giving him is worthless politics. Like Sen. Obama said, this election is not about quarreling over details of records or past job experience. Anything can be skewed to look anyone one wants. Sen. Obama wants to stay focused on the issues.

hehe   January 21st, 2008 9:16 pm ET

that is only because Edward changed. Clinton and obama behaved just as normal, argue with each other

Madelyn   January 21st, 2008 9:15 pm ET

I see it differently. Obama continues to stumble in response and does the circular dance.

Edwards is great.

Hillary is most comprehensive as she and Obama are getting more time. Even so, she certainly makes it understandable for us out here.

This is a great debate. But...give Edwards more time.

George   January 21st, 2008 9:15 pm ET

obama is getting shut down.

adam   January 21st, 2008 9:15 pm ET

Obama Was Praised for Standing Up on Tough Issues – Because His Senate Seat Was Not Vulnerable, He Used His Position To Help More Vulnerable Senators Do The Right Thing. Zorn wrote, “Obama, however, was in a safe district and never faced a serious challenge for his legislative seat. He had no need to shy from hard-line stands on gun control and abortion rights. He actually took such stands frequently and is now highly praised by advocates for both causes. [Chicago Tribune, Zorn, 3/9/04]

Marwan EL Kordy   January 21st, 2008 9:15 pm ET

True, it's now two agains one. Goes to show how much of an opportunist Edwards is. I used to like the man so much, even with no prospects, but now I see the opportunist. I believe Obama said he cast 4,000 votes, and out of which 100 were "present". That's 2.5% of the votes, but of course Edwards had to go and say 100 votes.

As for Clinton, I am glad her true self is coming out. Let's see if she get's advice now to cry at the end so we can forget about her nasty nasty attacks on Obama.

Why is everybody missing the fact that Clinton started this negativity!!!

LadyAfrica   January 21st, 2008 9:15 pm ET

I did not understand until this debate and certain occurrences over the last few days (Nevada) what the divisive label attached to Hillary Clinton meant. She is working hard to prove how shrewish she can handily be. The distortions and misrepresentations of Obama's interviews and statements prove that ,as President, she will distort and misrepresent the facts - thereby lying to the American people. So how will she be so different than George Bush, except she is extremely smarter than he could ever pray to be.

Daniel   January 21st, 2008 9:15 pm ET

Hillary is continuing to cling to that ring just like Schmeigel in the Lord of the Rings.

She will do or say anything to get elected. She is seething!!!!!

Obama did answer his voting "present" 133 times. First, it was out of 4000 votes. Second, it was to correct small discrepencies or problems in bills that had to be worked out.

Hillary is attacking Obama in the same way Karl Rove attacked Obama in the New York Times.

HILLARY WOULD HIRE KARL ROVE IF SHE COULD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Jenny   January 21st, 2008 9:15 pm ET

If Obama were to become the dems choice, he better start developing a tougher exterior. The republicans will eat him up. He does not answer the questions. He has a condesending tone when he says Hillary and Edward's names. It seems people around him (including Oprah) have built him up so much, he thinks he is invincible. Wrong!

Beverly   January 21st, 2008 9:15 pm ET

Senator Obama is developning a backbone to Hillary AND Bill Clinton's run for the presidency! If Hillary is the democratic nominee..can Bill become vice president?

No rules....Wolf getta a hold of this debate...

Bill Schroeder   January 21st, 2008 9:15 pm ET

Bill:

You're right on the money, Obama is DEFINITELY the front runner, and with Hillary and John on either side of him he's taking the punches, BUT he has'nt gone down for any count!!!!

Great Analysis, I enjoy your comments.

Bill Schroeder

Lillian   January 21st, 2008 9:15 pm ET

Obama seems tense and angry. He really is not used to being confronted and challendged..he is acting like every time someone asked him about his record..that it is a personal attack.
If he is acting like this against fellow Dems...g-d help him with the Republican hate machine!

Brandy, NJ   January 21st, 2008 9:14 pm ET

I think you are very wrong about Obama being the frontrunner. The reason he is attracting fire from both sides is because of his mis-steps in positions, lack of giving specifics and fact instead just talking about the other candidates positions or what they have said or done. There is a time and place for everything. A month ago it was okay for Obama to speak about the future ... to deam ... to inspire ... but now is the time to give FACTS and SPECIFICS ... he just can't deliver. He side-steps telling the American people and the other candidates HOW he plans to do ANYTHING.

HE really just sounds ignorant, I think that it is baffling Clinton and Edwards at some of the things that are coming out of his mouth. Face it ... Obama may have his time .. but it is not now. He needs more experience ... he is sounding very freshman because he doesn't have the experience to grow from. He may make a fine president ... but not today. He has to catch up and start providing step by step plans with structure ... not more historic prospectives or more inspirational thoughts ....

Edwards looks good. Clinton looks good when she isn't lowering herself with Obama.

Trisha Redwine   January 21st, 2008 9:14 pm ET

It seems to me that Mr. Obama has a hard time explaining himself on any point of his past record.

E   January 21st, 2008 9:14 pm ET

hillary started out with an advantage, she was clear and talking with more confidence than the others, but she made the mistake of letting this turn into a political slugfest this hurt her and obama to a lesser degree, with edwards gaining an upperhand on both of them. This makes for good t.v and will probably get more people interested though at a cost for both clinton and obama, which is edwards gain. Though he's screwing it up by ganging up on both them when the opportunity arises.

Gabor Ratky   January 21st, 2008 9:14 pm ET

I think this is the first debate where Sen. Clinton went over the line and resorted to tactics not worthy of the Democratic Party or Senators of the United States of America. It saddens me to see this kind of personal bashing instead of focusing on positions of the serious topics and problems to be solved at hand.

Gina   January 21st, 2008 9:14 pm ET

Yeah, frontrunner...in SC.

Tonight proves, no matter how loud the rally chants are, Obama is not ready and it's not his time. His time is coming–no doubt–he's an inspiration, but he seems to be causing more division within the party than helping to bring us together right now.

Ralph   January 21st, 2008 9:14 pm ET

I've been a Hillary supporter, but may re-assess. This performance is, frankly, embarrassing and does nothing to enhance her status.

John   January 21st, 2008 9:14 pm ET

Obama has made direct criticisms at Edwards, and Clinton's policies. Is this inevitability on his part?

Jack Lambert   January 21st, 2008 9:14 pm ET

Hillary better be careful attacking Barack on his past. She includes in her experience which qualifys her for the job of President her time spent as the Clinton first lady. Barack thus could fairly bring up issues like the Lincoln bedroom, the unexplained pardons, etc.

b matthew   January 21st, 2008 9:14 pm ET

The reason Democrats should not vote for B. Obama is that he is too naive, too much of a tax and spend Democrat, of old. Demagoguery, being all things to all people, does not function in today' sophisiticated Global Economy. It is time to put practical Politics back in the White House, and this begins with candidates like Hillary Clinton.

marky   January 21st, 2008 9:14 pm ET

For the first time Barack faces real heat in a debate and I find his lack of specifics and irritability disappointing. I am starting to understand why so many fellow dems question his readyness.

Jenny, Worcester MA   January 21st, 2008 9:13 pm ET

ARE YOU WRITING A SOAP OPERA?

Eric   January 21st, 2008 9:13 pm ET

Very good point Maria, but I doubt we'll get any straight answers about that from Obama. Its should just be tossed in the closet with his record. Mainstream America needs to realize that this isnt some pop political star were voting for as President. This is the next leader of the free world. This position requires experience and an open record.

Josh   January 21st, 2008 9:13 pm ET

You people amaze me....

YES HE ANSWERED IT...twice in fact....

he voted that way b/c it facilitate a means of him opposing a portion of a bill that he would have otherwise approved had that portion not been involved...

Wow you have all drank the "Clinton Kool-Aid"...

Katherine   January 21st, 2008 9:13 pm ET

Maria – he did say why. He said in Illinois it's customary to vote present when ou think the proposal needs changes. So, you're not for it as written, but not against it if it were changed. He also pointed out that he voted over 4000 times, so the 133 is a small percentage. He did answer it.

Anonymous   January 21st, 2008 9:13 pm ET

no more hillary, please

Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton= No Change

Vote diffrent-Obama 08

TC   January 21st, 2008 9:13 pm ET

I agree that both John and Hillary look at Obama as the front runner in SC. I hope he finds his step in this debate. John is the clear leader in this debate.

Orville H.   January 21st, 2008 9:13 pm ET

The way it looks now, Edwards wants to be the big VP. CLINTON AND EDWARDS what a mix. Obama knows he can't play off the race card, Clinton knows she can't play off the women card, and Edwards just wants a state somewhere ANYWHERE. Edwards is in the game and Hillary is rolling dice, I hope Obama don't get in trouble.

Noel   January 21st, 2008 9:13 pm ET

We think you are dead wrong in saying that Obama is the frontrunner. My husband and I both think that Edwards is coming out on top as Obama and Clinton keep digging their own graves with all these personal attacks. Edwards seems to be the strongest and MOST HONEST so far. We'd discounted him until now.

Derrick   January 21st, 2008 9:12 pm ET

Obama keeps showing his inexperience, he is being teamed up on because what he is saying makes no sense.

Rob   January 21st, 2008 9:12 pm ET

How do you figure "This debate clearly proves Obama is the frontrunner — at least in South Carolina?" Obama speaks and is countered by both HRC and JE because he is wrong, plain and simple.

S. Patel, Houston, TX   January 21st, 2008 9:12 pm ET

It is quite obvious that he is not used to being the center of attention – he cannot handle the heat with his fumbling, inarticulate answers...there are two experienced candidates in the race and Schneider's appointed ring leader is not one of them...

Emilio   January 21st, 2008 9:12 pm ET

I don't think Obama is the frontrunner at this point and time. Looks more like Hillary and Edwards going second.. Obama is loosing ground.

Jeff   January 21st, 2008 9:12 pm ET

It completely proves that obama is the front runner. what is sad is that Clinton is resorting to the same kind of tatics that the republicans resort too. I loved bill as our president but this isn't 92 or 96. if bill could run again i would vote for him. but the clintons are making themselves look horrible. And Obama is taking the high ground and so is edwards for that matter. Go obama

Lillian   January 21st, 2008 9:12 pm ET

I agree, Obama is the considered front runner in SC. The demographics cannot be denied.

Awale kullane   January 21st, 2008 9:12 pm ET

obama sound more realistic, Edward capitalizing on bringing back the troops not strategicaly but quickly . Clinton sounds that she is debating with bush on the issue of iraq insearh of sound-bites, similar to her reply in universal health care.

texasdem   January 21st, 2008 9:11 pm ET

Obama is showing his inexperience on issues. Edwards and Clinton are squeezing him on his plans for providing universal healthcare.

magda   January 21st, 2008 9:11 pm ET

imagine how the republicans would "cream" him if he were the nominee...

don't forget the only reason obama will win in south carolina is because blacks are voting based on race not on competency....south carolina's population does not represent the USA in any way shape or form

Sprite   January 21st, 2008 9:11 pm ET

Maria: I agree.

Aj   January 21st, 2008 9:11 pm ET

Hey BILL thank you, LET ppl point fingers on Obama. HE is going to prove just as he did in Iowa.

Brad   January 21st, 2008 9:11 pm ET

John Edwards just proved himself a hypocrite he said that Iraq has become more stable military situation since the Surge, then he says that the point was to create an environment for reconciliations between Sunni and Shi'ite. I think a more stable military situation is the environment that was supposed to be set up

s freeman   January 21st, 2008 9:11 pm ET

Bill, Why the camera shots of Hillary's backside? Is CNN sexest?

Donald Detroit,MI   January 21st, 2008 9:11 pm ET

Obama has a real change to win so you have to go after him

TC   January 21st, 2008 9:11 pm ET

I am an Obama supporter but he is not comfortable nor effective taking the heat.

RP   January 21st, 2008 9:11 pm ET

John Edwards and HIllary Clinton are both right on message tonight. Obama is getting what he deserves. He came out swinging at both of his colleagues tonight, Showing his immaturity again.

Paul   January 21st, 2008 9:11 pm ET

Bill try to keep your comments neutral. You sound as if you're on Obama's team

Steve   January 21st, 2008 9:11 pm ET

Welcome to the big league Obama !

Ahu Ozyurt   January 21st, 2008 9:11 pm ET

Obama is trying to persuade the voters to "do the right thing". Tough act. Let's see how he pulls it

Don   January 21st, 2008 9:11 pm ET

Obama is not my frontrunner. Hillary is doing a great job. You guys always report when the Clinton's "attack" others. Now when she is attacked you praise Obama. Double standards. I am from SC and Clinton has my vote. She has every right to defend her record and show the weakness of the other canidates. Stop trying to tell us who we should vote for.

Ed   January 21st, 2008 9:11 pm ET

Obama doesn't have any better chance of winning in November than Clinton does. If we want another republican in the white house all we have to do is nominate one of them.

Ken from ColSpgs   January 21st, 2008 9:11 pm ET

I think all of them are off based on the IRAQ think..
Yes we need to get out of there, but not until we get the job done.

What none of them realizes, or wants to admit to is if we pull out then Al-Quieda will be grabbing a strong hold of the country and use it for a base. Iraq has to be able to support themselves before we leave otherwise we just created a terror nation.

This is why most of the Republician candidates (i.e Huckabee) have my support on how they are proposing to handle the war. (exception to this is Ron Paul).

mfhunt   January 21st, 2008 9:11 pm ET

Where is Kucinich? I agree...Edwards may step forward with all the squabbling Obama and Clinton are doing.

BlueOkie   January 21st, 2008 9:11 pm ET

I think this tag team against Obama doesn't prove he's the front runner, it proves that he hasn't been held acountable for saying something and doing something else.

He's just skipped by in all the debates pointing fingers and spreading his own propaganda...now's he's finally being held accountable for his record and he can't take the heat.

Anthony   January 21st, 2008 9:11 pm ET

This proves his viability as a serious presidential candidate. The other candidates want him out as soon as possible, as does the republican party. They don't want to run against him.

Matt   January 21st, 2008 9:11 pm ET

the frontrunner in South Carolina....and he has no reason to be. He's got nothing but Rhetoric. That's all it is. He's an amazing public speaker. Hillary said it best in NH when she told all the young people at her victory rally that they voted with the hearts AND with their heads. He can pull in a heart with his voice, but he cant get a head to agree because he has no record to back it up

Economy Romney   January 21st, 2008 9:10 pm ET

Economy Romney is the man for the times he has the experience and vision.

Hillary Hates Cats so I hope Obama wins the Democratic side

Romeny Vs. Obama is the match up I am looking for, I can live with either one of them winning.

Amy   January 21st, 2008 9:10 pm ET

I disagree. I think Hillary and Edwards sound the most confident and passionate, not to mention have plans to back up what they're saying...

Parag   January 21st, 2008 9:10 pm ET

That's where it should head to. That puts Edwards back on map. In fact, he can't fight against Clinton legacy. After all, VP does all the job...Look Dick Cheney promptin Bush for everything. Edwards can do that effectively for good reasons. Hillary can do job of giving effective speeches and convince people emotionally.

Russ   January 21st, 2008 9:10 pm ET

Can't they just answer the questions, instead they are deciding to brings up past issues. Stick to the questions at hand.

Josh   January 21st, 2008 9:10 pm ET

I think he's doing decent, considering he's being ganged-up on. He could be doing better though.

Zsar   January 21st, 2008 9:10 pm ET

Obama is not looking good. Hillary and John are doing a great job.

Carl   January 21st, 2008 9:10 pm ET

I think Barack is handling himself quite well. He also has put himself back in the driver's seat. I think he is definitely the frontrunner of this debate and being more clear on his policies than usual – I guess he got the memo.

Alberto   January 21st, 2008 9:10 pm ET

Edwards is starting to sound like Hillary with the way he's ganging up on Obama...Hillary already got some booes...does he want some as well??

I do agree that the Big O has to improve on some of his rebuttals though, this is good practice for the Republican attacks to come...heavy sparring of sorts...

Rich Lieberman   January 21st, 2008 9:10 pm ET

The personal attacks between Obama and Clinton are PRECISELY the reason why a majority of American don't vote.

It's the ISSUES, Stupid!

Rich Lieberman
San Francisco

Robert OH   January 21st, 2008 9:10 pm ET

Didn't this happen with Hillary not to long ago, John, please choose a side!

Ade   January 21st, 2008 9:10 pm ET

what happens after South Carolina? I don't think he is the national frontrunner.

Kevin,FL   January 21st, 2008 9:10 pm ET

BILL DONT JUMP THE GUN.. CLINTON 08

Maria   January 21st, 2008 9:09 pm ET

Sen. Obama did not say why he voted 'present' 133 times. We really need to hear his answer.

Mark   January 21st, 2008 9:09 pm ET

Barack responded well to Edwards question on troop withdrawls from Iraq. Obama just found his footing in this debate.

ally   January 21st, 2008 9:09 pm ET

The fact that Edwards and Clinton are focusing so much of their energy of bashing Obama shows how seriously they take him as an opponent. If his fellow candidates see him as having such a good chance, how must the voters see him?

Eric   January 21st, 2008 9:09 pm ET

He clearly cant handle the pressue, its evident over the TV, he looks tense and uncomfortable. He is clearly showing this to America.

adam   January 21st, 2008 9:09 pm ET

It's giving BO a great chance to defend Point of views that have been Slandered but BO needs to step it up!!

Chris, Orlando FL   January 21st, 2008 9:09 pm ET

Frontrunner in a primary state that's 50% African American, yes. Frontrunner in the national sense? No. Obama's a neophyte and it's showing. His campaign must be cringing.

Truth   January 21st, 2008 9:09 pm ET

Obama knows how that feels now, doesnt he?!!!

Jude   January 21st, 2008 9:09 pm ET

I don' t think OBAMA is the frontrunner.

Robert in Albuquerque   January 21st, 2008 9:09 pm ET

I'm waiting for Obama to play the "Fear" card now. ( 9-11)

David Adkins   January 21st, 2008 9:09 pm ET

Hillary plays the blame game but look back in the 1990' s again her husband signed NAFTA

j.l.   January 21st, 2008 9:09 pm ET

I still think Obama's keeping his cool. For those that don't follow him, he always talks with a stutter and pauses. It's his style. I like that about him, he isn't the uptight 'i'm going to give a false image of myself just so people will like me". Instead he embraces his true self and is showing us his true self.

Go OBAMA!

Drew   January 21st, 2008 9:09 pm ET

Well, if "talking heads" like those at CNN would actually call Obama out and not give him a free pass maybe he wouldn't be the "frontrunner"....

It's laughable to watch Wolf and others at CNN lob softball's at him and throw hardballs at Clinton. And guess what? I'm not voting for either of them!

clc   January 21st, 2008 9:09 pm ET

Amen!

beasleybrother1   January 21st, 2008 9:09 pm ET

You are right Bill Schneider. He is not looking as perfect as he normally does. I think that Clinton and Edwards are putting him into a position that will in 6 months look like a picnic compared to what the GOP will do to him

Harold   January 21st, 2008 9:09 pm ET

That is not true

Lesley   January 21st, 2008 9:08 pm ET

Bill–that may have been the case before tonight, but after watching Obama's lame performance, I'm not so sure he should be the frontrunner in anything.

Kelly Ayers   January 21st, 2008 9:08 pm ET

Can I work in CNN? LOL I wanna get my chance at offering some more centralizing questions so this beating around the bush can STOP! I don't want to be entertained, I want to be informed!

Too much rhetoric and not enough facts....

Andrew   January 21st, 2008 9:08 pm ET

obama just looks bumbling tonight... i dont know how people think he could be presidential.

PK   January 21st, 2008 9:08 pm ET

Nah – the main difference tonight is that Edwards is also attacking Obama. Edwards usually aligns with Obama. Edwards is reminding Hillary that he'd love to be her VP.

mrtrate   January 21st, 2008 9:08 pm ET

He is the front runner – GO OBAMA!!!!!

michael   January 21st, 2008 9:08 pm ET

How true... howevery some might read is a exposing Obama inexpreience.

Awaiting Moderation, USA   January 21st, 2008 9:08 pm ET

This is good practice for him when he debates in the general election.

Becky   January 21st, 2008 9:08 pm ET

They are literaly attacking him from both sides. He appears to be standing strong.

James Brown ( Independent )   January 21st, 2008 9:08 pm ET

Obama has held his own and at times made Clinton look silly , she looks like a fish out of water tonight.

Ryan   January 21st, 2008 9:08 pm ET

I think Hillary realizes that the bickering is making her and Obama look bad, so if she "team's up" with Edwards, then it takes some of the heat off her and puts it on Obama.

John   January 21st, 2008 9:08 pm ET

And Obama isn't handling it well at all. He just starts rambling and I can't even follow what he's saying. I still don't understand what his healthcare plan is.

adam   January 21st, 2008 9:08 pm ET

This may be counter progressive for Hillary, just like NH's primarys. When JE and BO teamed up on her.

Aron in South Carolina   January 21st, 2008 9:08 pm ET

Edwards is succeeding in turning attention to him, both on the medical and the Iraq issues. The other two are now responding to his comments. A sign of a good politician is being able to dominate the room, and Edwards, starting from way behind, is doing well in this regard.

Nik T, Houston, TX   January 21st, 2008 9:07 pm ET

Bill Scheider, Obama is NOT the frontrunner. He's the one the media has treated as Teflon not having questioned anything about him. Hillary and Edwards are doing the job reporting what you Obama fans at CNN should have.

David   January 21st, 2008 9:07 pm ET

Bill,
Yes, he is frontrunner in SC, it will make him real frontrunner

Sylvia   January 21st, 2008 9:07 pm ET

the night is not over....HILLARY will win!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Bill   January 21st, 2008 9:07 pm ET

Clinton/Edwards '08!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room. Download this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

twitter
Categories
Powered by WordPress.com VIP