January 21, 2008
Posted: 09:06 PM ET
 Is Obama the man to beat in South Carolina?
Is Obama the man to beat in South Carolina?


MYRTLE BEACH, South Carolina (CNN) —
This debate clearly proves Obama is the frontrunner — at least in South Carolina. The other two candidates are teaming up on him, and it's a role he's not accustomed to in debates. Hillary Clinton has always been the center of attention. How things can change!

Related: Watch Edwards and Obama spar over their voting records. 

– CNN Senior Political Analyst Bill Schneider

Filed under: Bill Schneider


Tim C.   February 4th, 2008 2:45 pm ET

Hillary can't win in November !!!!!!!!!! - Vote Obama.

Tim C.   February 4th, 2008 2:39 pm ET

Hillary can't win !!!!!!!!!! -Vote OBAMA..

Angel   January 23rd, 2008 10:56 am ET

It clearly proves, that Obama has no real program…"Bill Clinton" or "I'm a victim" are his only words to defend his candidacy…It's not enough. In politic, you shouldn't judge people on a color or a gender.The most important thing is what they propose and how they explain it.
I like Hillary Clinton not because she's a woman, but because she has more than a dream to give, she can make it…

Joeseph   January 23rd, 2008 2:06 am ET

It's funny, the democrats have gotten REALLY divided here. I support Obama, but feel like Hillary is Bush or something. Odd, huh? Originally I supported her, but lost respect for her when she never complimented Obama, pretty much brushed him aside as a nobody and then went out and made inaccurate criticisms and tried winning on a policy of negativity and "getting real".

I don't know, I almost feel like I wouldn't be able to vote for Hillary in a national, even though I know I should for obvious reasons. Obama had better win here, I don't think she has a real chance of winning a national election. I'm a diehard democrat and feel this way, I'm sure a number of other folks do too. More frustrating, she would probably never even give Obama the VP, because she can't stand being outshined by a charismatic leader like that.

This is the attitude that frustrates me, she walks in there like she already is president and is infuriated that anyone would try to take that away from her. IF she does get the nomination she had better give him VP, otherwise forget it.

If Obama gets SC, I think he could do well on Super Tuesday and hopefully take the nomination.

keithlyn   January 22nd, 2008 11:35 pm ET

I love to see a woman being so strong, Hilary makes me proud to be a woman. during the dabate last night I could have follow what she had to say from start to finish, unlike Obama, everything he said that I understood, I had to question

Jack Toudeka   January 22nd, 2008 9:52 pm ET

Hillary will never go back in the White House. Our country is not a dictatorial or a monarchy, or a kingdom Cliton-Bush. GO Obama GO. Go in the White House. The majority such Democrats, Republicans, and Independentas support you. GO Obama GO in the White House.

Randy Gardner   January 22nd, 2008 9:50 pm ET

I like edwards he keep his cool and thats what we need

john   January 22nd, 2008 9:25 pm ET

Go Obama go!!
You are the only one running from outside the corrupted establishment, and the only one capable of bringing change to our country and our politics!!

Mary   January 22nd, 2008 9:25 pm ET

The SC debate clearly showed Obama inexperience. Finally more people realize that experience does matter most especially for the position as President. Hillary was clearly the one with detailed and knowledgable answers to the tough questions and issues important to the American public.

PeopleWAKEUP!   January 22nd, 2008 9:22 pm ET

It would be a DREAM for the Republicans if Hillary won the nomination. She's devisive, she can't bring people together and she's MORE OF THE SAME. If you all want a Republican in office AGAIN, then vote for Hillary. She will NOT win the general election, because she appeals to only SOME Democrats. The Republicans would not want Obama to be the nominee because he will unite this country and Republicans will vote for him. Republicans voted for him in Illinois, and he currently has the support of "red state" governors including North and South Dakota…PEOPLE WAKE UP!

Obama 08!

Rosanette Lind   January 22nd, 2008 6:45 pm ET

I'm glad you are bringing out the dispute between Clinton & Obama. Personally, I'm sick of Hillary & Bill Clinton stabbing Obama from all sides. I feel very sorry for Obama. He doesn't need to say a word to Hillary when she begins jabbing. I think if he just stayed silent that she wouldn't have much else to say. She is changing what he stood for in the beginning. I believe the Clintons would do anything & I truly mean anything to be in the White House. I wonder just what their reasons actually are for wanting this so much. Quite honestly when the fall elections roll around if Hillary is on the ballot I'm voting Republican. I'm exhausted from it all.

Thanks for all your hard work with the issues,
Rosanette Lind

Lee   January 22nd, 2008 4:42 pm ET

I was torn between Clinton and Obama before the debate. I came away though, VERY impressed by the only adult in the group, Sen. Edwards. He just has to step back, stay rational , and let the other two tear each other apart.

Nomad   January 22nd, 2008 4:02 pm ET

Obama is ALWAYS slow to answer and evasive — he has to think a LONG time to come up with those evasive answers! Hillary and Husband is scary — BUT, how could we possibly think Barack can handle the job of President. Even WITH advisors, he's too green. Heaven help us. Go Hillary … I guess?!?!!?

A Wolzen   January 22nd, 2008 3:59 pm ET

It's refreshing to see diversity on the stage, but supporting women in politics (or an African-American for that matter) does not mean prioritizing race or gender over issues. This is one thing voters can't ignore.

Tracey   January 22nd, 2008 3:12 pm ET

Thought the same thing….Clinton/Edwards '08!

Here's why it should be Clinton/Edwards & not Clinton as a VP. History has shown that it is difficult for a VP to become pres, and it would be extremely difficult for Clinton to make that transition. However, if Edwards is VP, he would have a better likelihood of becoming pres…..of course, after Hillary's two terms!

Go Hillary, go powerful American women! This is our one big chance! And my money is on "EXPERIENCE IN CHANGE!"

move_foward   January 22nd, 2008 3:10 pm ET

Obama is bringing something to washington that is new and fresh it's time for us to move on too the future and stop trying to put the soon to be divorced Billary back into the white house. Edwards is a distraction he will side with who ever is on top. Obama took them on very well. GOP wants Obama out because they no he will bring a new breed of voters to the Nomination real americans that want real change. Obama 08!!

Andrea Texas   January 22nd, 2008 3:09 pm ET

It would be refreshing if the media would treat Mr Obama the same as the other candidates. What's with the kiddie gloves when he is on the line?

Gloria   January 22nd, 2008 3:08 pm ET

I believe that Obama lost the debate last night. He was very evasive when someone tried to pin him down to a actual plan. He talks about change but has no solutions to offer. Everyone knows we need change after Bush. Obama came out swinging against HRC. But when she swings back he cries foul. I think his inexperience showed last night. If he was to win the nomination the Republicans would make short work of him. I also believe the media is handling him with kid gloves. They do not hold him to the same standard as the other people running for the most important job in the word. I think he is probable a fine man just not the man for the job now. Hillary had actual ideas to offer that would bring about change.

Matt B   January 22nd, 2008 3:06 pm ET

Just psted this from CNN's canidates page:
Barack Obama
Would create a national health insurance program for individuals who do not have employer-provided health care and who do not qualify for other existing federal programs. Allows individuals to choose between the new public insurance program or from among private insurance plans that meet certain coverage standards. Requires employers who do not provide health coverage for employees to pay into the national health insurance program. Does not mandate individual coverage for all Americans, but requires coverage for all children. Allows individuals below age 25 to be covered through their parents' plans. Cost estimated between $50 billion and $65 billion, to be paid for by eliminating Bush tax cuts for those earning over $250,000.

kelly   January 22nd, 2008 3:03 pm ET

Obama is hands down my choice for frontrunner. He demonstrated his resilience through his responses to all the cheap shots launched by Clinton and Edwards.

KIZITON   January 22nd, 2008 2:58 pm ET

By carefully listening to Obama, Edwards,and Hillary I truly believe that Obama was the best. He really does understand the main issues of little American people. He is a good listener. Over and over Obama is touching the heart of all people. He will be our next President, yes President of unity of all American people. In order to bring about change, Obama must fight… We thank God…

Craig, Seattle, WA   January 22nd, 2008 2:47 pm ET

I want EXPERIENCE.. not all this talk about "change" which is all Obama can rant on about. EXPERIENCE MATTERS!.. CLINTON/EDWARDS 08!!!!!

Nazir Jamal   January 22nd, 2008 2:47 pm ET

As a Canadian I watched last night's debate very closely and my humble opinion, Barak was a clear winner, my concern is if they do not stop attacking eachother, the republicans will gain ground and the momentum from the dems.
I also think that President Clinton should not be attcking Obabam the way he does as it unbecomming of a ex-president. All in all the american elections are fun to watch.
Jamal

SANDY   January 22nd, 2008 2:45 pm ET

OBAMS ATTACKED HILLARY CLINTON LAST NIGHT, BUT SHE STOOD STRONG AND PUT HIM IN HIS PLACE. GO HILLARY.

Amarjit Kaur   January 22nd, 2008 2:32 pm ET

Obama didn't stand strong in yesterday's debate. What he did do was rumble on and on; he didn't answer any of the questions directly. I still don't understand any of his plans. He hasn't done much for the country. Hillary has more experience in serving our country as a senator and first lady. As a result, it's hard to have faith that he'll do anything, or even be able to execute anything. What's more is that the media doesn't question him as much as they question the other two canidates. Therfore, very little is known of him. I won't vote for him based on the fact that he is popular, black, or that he has to face two Clintons. Obama's spouse rallies for him, as well as John Edwards' spouse, and she is battling cancer at the same time. The media always being on Clinton's back is making her stronger, simply because she answers their questions head on, and doesn't beat around the bush like others.

CJ Pruitt   January 22nd, 2008 2:13 pm ET

It was very clear to me that Clinton/Edwards 08 has been consumated after last night's debate. I hope that she has better luck with him than John Kerry did in 04. Clearly, they are both willing to say anything to get elected.

I like Obama because I feel that he will tell you the truth, even if it may not be what you want to hear. I applaud his willingness and stamina to stand up there and take it from both sides without resulting to petty insults and name calling.

Though he was not at his best and that is clearly because he was being hammered 2-1 he carried himself with class. He may not win the election because the powers working against him are too great, too manipulative, and willing to say anything to get elected. The Clintons have done this before and will never change because the American public falls for it everytime.

Corey Mills   January 22nd, 2008 1:58 pm ET

Obama can transform our countries DARK yesterdays into BRIGHT tommorows.
Remember We The People meaning ONE. With that said put your civil defenses down for that war has long been over. The old wounds of our nation can only be healed when we recognize truth over personal prejudices. Lastly ask yourself this.
What inspires you? The past, present or future. Tommorow has to be written! So write the next chapter in hard truth, because it is you and I it will affect.

DK   January 22nd, 2008 1:49 pm ET

If you looked closely at the debate Obama started the personal attacks on Clinton and for some reason the media is making him out like the victim? I think Obama's inexperience and the media's bias is showing. Obama may think he is positioning himself as the people's presidential candidate by acting like a newbie when it serves him, but it cuts both ways and it more often comes off like he isn't presidential material. Who knows maybe because of his admiration for Republicans he's taking cues from Bush Jr's schtick of acting like a regular "dumb" joe. Hope it wins you some Republican votes because I will be voting for Clinton. Bill for First Man! By the way did anyone pick up on Obama's arrogance? Especially when they questioned the "change" candidate on why he has so many old Clinton advisors on his staff? He responded to numerous tough questions with arrogance and evasion, yet another Republican tactic.

Judy   January 22nd, 2008 1:36 pm ET

I think Obama did not handle the debate well. Edwards had a point about Obama bringing up their voting records and getting defensive when questioned about his own voting record. What's fair is fair. And as far as Obama complaining about Bill Clinton….Keep the spouses out of it! Nobody is attacking Obama's family! I think it is only right that Bill sticks up for his wife. I would hope that Barrack Obama or John Edwards would do the same thing….and I have actually heard Edwards wife supporting him. I would hope that my own husband would do the same. If Obama can't stand the heat…..get out of the kitchen! AND as for Obama saying…."Same old Washington Politics" when he talks about Clinton…..How does anyone know what Obama will do if he gets elected. Do we say that about Obama in 2years? "Same old Washington Politics"? You can't say he will be any better in several years. It is just a way to get elected because he knows people want change! I say a change would be a democratic president, Period!!!!

mike   January 22nd, 2008 1:20 pm ET

After last nights debate it is clear to me that Hillary is the right woman for the job. Obama successfully side stepped the questions and issues at hand. Instead of clearly articulating and defending his positions he went on the offensive trying to discredit Hillary and the ongoing support of her husband and former president Bill Clinton. Wake up America! Change is needed. Hillary and Bill back in the white house make the most sense. A Clinton/Edwards ticket would be great for America.

L.C.   January 22nd, 2008 1:18 pm ET

It was sad watching the debate last night. I think politicians and the media think average people are blind. Anyone with an ounce of brains could see that John Edwards is in this ring solely to help Hilary win. I don't believe that he was allowed to get away with I am the only candidate that can win in the south. This was an insult to southern whites (the emphasis was southern whites won't vote for a black candidates) and blacks (You better vote for a white if you want to win) give me a break america is changing. Barack have more courage than both Hilary and john. He could have listen to the negatives that said a black man can't win but he didn't. A country divided against itself cannot stand. The Clinton are catering to blacks and hispanic because they make the democratic party but I am afraid the division is going to really hurt the party this time around. Most people that are behind Obama would rather see a republican win than Hilary. I would like to see barack team up with an independent (Mayor Bloomberg) and the two would be unbeatable. Who is funding John Edwards I would like to know the answer to this.

Pamela Watkins   January 22nd, 2008 1:17 pm ET

Woooo…I have reservations about the Cinton machine. I also have found myself, more often then not embarrased by their actions. Good Grief, It was MLK Day of Recongnition and Bill couldn't even keep awake? I think Hillary has more challenges in her personal life and definately can't project a good image to our own country folks. I am for everything I hear, while, what happened to all of us being equal? I am a retired professional woman, however, I sure as heck didn't attack someone else to get there, nor did I use my husband's jewlry or title to make be better than what I just was. For crikey sakes, we have enough of our own baggage in this country, not take haul for any more decades the Clinton's baggage. They just live in their own world as defined by their personal needs first who ever they use or try to destroy to get there. Too much chaos with Clintons and promises not recognized these days.

dine   January 22nd, 2008 1:14 pm ET

hillary did very well last night. she showed obama true color, inexperience therefore vulnerable in the general election. he just can't sustain a strong debate this is so obvious.
it was a debate about records.
this has been what hillary has been longing for all along . a true debate shows how much a leader she really is.

Mike   January 22nd, 2008 1:09 pm ET

America needs a big change. Are there only two families for presidence, Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton? What change is Hillary going to bring to America that she didn't bring in those days she lived in the White house?

Sandy   January 22nd, 2008 1:08 pm ET

I feel that Clinton/ Edwards would be a great combo. I think Obama is bringing race into the campaign entirely too much. Race has little to do with the economy. I am a single white female and I work 70 hours a week at two jobs so it is not easy no matter what your skin color. It is about the experience to get this economy back on track. Our economy was good under Bill Clinton and I think Hillary played a role with his track record! Good luck to Hillary!!!!

Hallind   January 22nd, 2008 1:06 pm ET

All three of these candidates are good. The ones who didn't have enought money to last this long were good too. What we must do is determine who will be the best candidate for President and who will survive the republican party's dirty-fighting tactics.
We also have to realize that there is so much going wrong with American right now. Money, reputation, terrorism, money, global warming, out-of-sight healthcare costs, lack of optimism - hope, etc. We need a candidate who can implement the kind of changes we need in these dire times. We really need someone of the calibre of Roosevelt. Someone who can help lift people out of poverty, give the middle class a chance to revitalize itself, and restore our reputation in the world.

Brian   January 22nd, 2008 12:58 pm ET

When Obama chose Ronald Reagan as the former president to praise, I wondered why he didn't choose a former president from his own party. I really doubt he can be a leader if he even forgot which party he belongs to.

Rosa Jackson   January 22nd, 2008 12:58 pm ET

Frankly, I can care less, concerning what is said at the debates, it means nothing to me. Hard to watch sometime, the meanness on the debate, and reading your responds, is just as nasty. Everybody colors is coming out. I was going to vote for HC because I love what bill did when he was the head man. So I told people if we vote for HC we will get BC, and then he can balance everything we need him to balance, putting ihe country back where it should have never left. Thanks Mr. Bush for making all the wrong moves, and destorying this country. Then, Maybe this is what God wants, Maybe God thinks that we have been second to none to long. I'm still praying for all of us in the USA. I will vote for BO, because HC will not listen to BC when she is the head of the free world. I beleive that BO wants to bring the entire country together, and I beleive that's what we need right now, someone who understands us all. I don't want no one to force me to buy medical Ins. I choose to pay as I go, and every medical bill I make I pay, I sick of all these mandates, and fines, it's just another way for the government to take your money.When the government want more of your money, they make a law to get more, please, houses are not worth the money they say they are, but it gives the the county a reason to get more of your money, taxes and more tax. Gas is too high, food, housing, and everything else is out of control. Check out the stock market, everything is insane. The country is sick and gitting sicker. So stop hating,help BO heal this country, or be like Rome, and Fall.RJ

Victoria   January 22nd, 2008 12:56 pm ET

How can anyone support HIllary when she made such a mess of the health insurance initiative she headed up in the '90s?????? Why do we think she will do any better this time around????? She had her chance — we need someone new.

David   January 22nd, 2008 12:53 pm ET

I guess it takes (2) to go against Obama…… I dont think there will be a Clinton/Edwards 08, if everyone could think beyond COLOR, you could see who the common sense choice would be……..

Placidkath   January 22nd, 2008 12:51 pm ET

Since it can't be Clinton/Clinton…..Clinton/Edwards is the way to go. They are pretty much of the same mindset. Obama is not the man he portrays. And his inexperience is starting to show.

Confused Student   January 22nd, 2008 12:50 pm ET

It is clear that the opposing parties 'fear' Obama, they wouldn't gang up on him if they didn't. He has been the one I have liked throughout the election, but I seem to increasingly like Edwards. He is WAY behind, but I think that he definitely controlled the flow of the debate last night. With him wanting to brown nose Clinton, I tend to lose that likability for him.

Obama is handling all the heat well, I still think that there are few things he could do better in order to ACTUALLY become the front-runner. For now, he is doing well, just step it up in SC Obama and you will take control of this election.

Matt in NC   January 22nd, 2008 12:49 pm ET

I feel that most democrats will proudly support whoever wins the nomination. It is frustrating for the Republicans that a winner has not yet been determined. They do not have a clear democratic nominee to attack yet. We should all prepare ourselves for the most contentious election ever. Despite the serious fractures in the GOP and failings of Bush it will be a nasty process that will have many Americans tuning out and showing up to vote. I suggest a button that reads “I’ve already decided so leave me alone!”

Phil Pallette   January 22nd, 2008 12:44 pm ET

Obama's a winning force and outstanding thinker, Hillary a hard working and effective senator, but Edwards is clearly the all around strongest candidate here. He lacks the uniqueness of his "celebrity" opponents when compared with them, but at the grass roots level—where Bush won in 2004—he is the strongest candidate against the Republicans. Why the majority does not see that—it's perception over reality here, and reality may or may not win out. Edwards is a fighter and we need that now. Obama's top contributors are high execs with Lehman Bros, Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase. Accroding to columnist Juan Gonzalez writing about Obama "Among his other top contributors are executives of Exelon Corp., the largest nuclear power operator in the nation. In 2005, Obama talked in a Senate hearing of leaving "on the table" the building of new nuclear power plants - the kind of change that has Exelon ecstatic.
Edwards says "no" to building nuclear power plants. Why? Though it burns clean, there is residual toxic waste. And despite what one MIT expert says, we can put solar, wind and oceanic wave power on line in five years. For example, in 1941, the US lagged far behind Japan in all types of military technology. Look what we did in 3 1/2 years to make Japan's technolgy obsolete! Another example, in 1961, JFK pledged to put a man on the moon by the end of the decade. We could barely orbit a satelite at the time and there were many doubters, but with a concentrated effort, we did it in 1969. We can do the same with solar and other alternative engergy sources. New technolgies to use these resources will be developed—technologies that we cannot imagine today.

Joanne   January 22nd, 2008 12:43 pm ET

Obama you won this debate and you will win the election! . . . I now have hope for the future with you being our next President!

Jeanie Washington   January 22nd, 2008 12:43 pm ET

I truly, feel, Bill Clinton is showing his true colors, Hillary, is a coward. I use to think Mr Clinton was a great person, I think he needs to stop his acts of evil, he is no better than Mr Bush.
you can truly see that his ego is in his way, just think if Hillary becomes President, it will be Bill running the white house. and all the stuff that goes with it. have we forgotten, his past. Trust me at his age, he is still looks not at Hillary, they use each other. I think we had enough of the Bush now this all over again. give me a break. Its sad that people or just plan dumb.
Remeber the money that their dear friend went to jail for. It hurts to think i truly felt he Mr Clinton was a great person at one time. it over for me. He a shrewed man.

A Peruvian Republican   January 22nd, 2008 12:35 pm ET

If Hillary had any dignity at all, she would have divorced Bill. I mean, if a semen stain proven to be your husband's on another woman's dress does not make you spit in his face and take a hike, I don't know what does.

IF HILLARY LETS HER OWN HUSBAND WALK ALL OVER HER, IMAGINE WHAT SHE WILL LET OTHER NATIONS DO TO US.

Hillary, first you have to respect yourself before you can earn the respect of others.

cmm   January 22nd, 2008 12:34 pm ET

The bottom line is this you all are getting played.. You keep supporting Hilliary and the end results in 08 the Presidential winner will be a Republican. I am a die hard Democrat but my vote will go to Obama in the primary. If he does not come out on top i will be voting republican. I don't want to see her in office. It's just like having her husband who i supported. I want something new.

gw   January 22nd, 2008 12:30 pm ET

Thank you Paul from ILL. I have been waiting for someone to tell me what Obama has done in ILL. to show us what experience he has if any! He says he is all about change, what changes has he made for the better in ILL. Please someone let me know.
All he does is attack Hillary for what her husband did or didnt do in the past. GET THIS OBAMA…DAH!!! BILL ISNT RUNNING!! Debate about issues what you you all going to do for us quite attacking… At least Hillary tried to be civil but OBAMA doesnt want to let it go. Showing his inability to debate anything.
You Obama supporters especially vets. This man shows no respect for our flag, he wont place his hand over his heart to say the pledge of alligance, he refused to wear a simple american flag pin to show support for our country and what it stands for let alone the men who died for this country. IF… he was elected would he put his hand on a bible to be sworn in???
Hillary is forceful, She is woman and she roars. There were many women in our history here and in the world who have been in charge of countries and did there jobs well. Stop comparing her to her husband she is HILLARY CLINTON AND THAT IS WHO IS RUNNING NOT BILL leave her baggage out of it.
If you want to know her read her book and you will learn about the way she was brought up and how she came to the point she is at now. Stop judging her on her husbands miss givings.

Ty   January 22nd, 2008 12:30 pm ET

No one seems to be hitting this one correctly Obama is Bush in a different shirt. He is someone you would like to hang out with because you can outwit him and make easy jokes about him. Clinton has experience and answers Obama has nothing to stand on. He doesnt answer any question and I agree with Clinton he gives no straight foward answers. Everyone needs to quit riding the wave of Obama and make a good logical decesion for Hillary.

DP   January 22nd, 2008 12:16 pm ET

Everyone is tripping, politics is dirty business and it has always been. You guys are unbelievable thinking that it is not. Nobody has there hands clean. We need new blood in there we need someone who can change the face of America. Obama said that and I respect him for that. You have no idea what the Clintons have done behind close doors, check it out now with Bill taking shots and getting dirty. Who started it? It will never be clean, I think though Obama will be the best at shaking up Washington, trust me and getting things passed. The Republicans HATE the Clintons, what can she do as President.

ABRAHAM MATHEW   January 22nd, 2008 12:16 pm ET

AMERICA DOES NOT NEED A SMOOTH TALKING, " LIKABLE ", PRETENDING TO CHANGE THE SYSTEM ' BROTHER ' AS OUR NEXT PRESIDENT. HE HAS NOT PROVIDED ANY SPECIFICS ON HOW HE WILL RUN THIS GREAT COUNTRY OF OURS. BEWARE AMERICA.

cemeni   January 22nd, 2008 12:07 pm ET

C'mon you people. Hilary belongs to the past together with Bill. All they do is act like republicans who attack without looking at their own records…lies and more lies. Does anybody re,ember that Hillary is keeping her 12,000 page records (of purported experience) under locks till 2012 because she knows it will add to non experience when scrutinized.
Obama has made a mark in people's minds and souls already! Bill clinton knows this, and so does Hillary and Edwards. Yesterdays debate tells it all, Edwards is gropping in the dark after series of losses from past elections to a possible one in his state of birth.

Hillary, please read and understand policy proposals before you criticize. Rem obama is Ivy league 2X.

Go Obama!

John J   January 22nd, 2008 11:57 am ET

I was a little taken back by the question as well. It was a good debate, however; ther were several question that O'Baby never answered. He started the attacks and then could'nt "stand the heat". I just think he is a big cry baby. He better "get a little tough' the repubs will eat him up and spit him out.

O' yes Hillary Clinton won that debate, on facts.

The Hall's   January 22nd, 2008 11:57 am ET

Hillary / Edwards

Hillary / Bill

Hillary / Gore

Taking all bets!

Terrance, Atlanta   January 22nd, 2008 11:56 am ET

I think it is getting out of hand how people attack Hillary for citing 8 years in the white house as experience…as if she was lying on her back the entire time. She was very active in his administration. She was an advocate of education and healthcare reform as first lady just as she continues to be today.

If I was the son of Johnny Cochran, my mere exposure to such legal savvy would better equip me to understand the law. If I then qualified that exposure by becoming a member of the bar and practicing at on of the top firms in the world, then I would add my last name to my resume. Just as Hillary has gained exposure to Bill, she was the confidant, the pillow talk advisor, and the dinner table consultant to one of the most brilliant political minds in the Democratic Party. She qualified that experience by serving the constituents of NY on the Armed Services committee.

Is that not experience…

Kerri   January 22nd, 2008 11:52 am ET

I am voting for John Edwards b/c he has the most comprehensive, UNDERSTANDABLE, and well thought out plans for everything from education, to health care, to a withdrawal strategy in Iraq. Hillary is my second choice. I am beginning to think that I would rather vote for a Republican than Sen. Barak "if you stand for nothing, you will fall for anything" Obama.

@lex   January 22nd, 2008 11:49 am ET

Clinton/Edwards 08. Edwards knows the he is not a contender anymore. so i think the right choice for him should be to team up with Clinton. 1

Rachel   January 22nd, 2008 11:42 am ET

As clean and positive as Obama has been trying to run his campaign, unfortunately he will have to start slinging some mud back and defend himself against false and inaccurate accusations. The Clintons know that they have way more skeletons in their closets so they are pulling at straws trying to smear Obama's name. Oh, and Bill needs to STFU. It's his wife running, not him, and him trying to bad mouth his wife's opponents are not earning her any admirers.

Paul_Illinois   January 22nd, 2008 11:36 am ET

Obama is all talk and hype, his credentials are hyped by the friendly media and have gotten the right scrutiny, so is his personal deal with lobbyists here in Illinois, PACS and corporations like Exelon that have financed his political career from the beginning, not to mention the shady deals with his long time friend Rezko here. The fact that Obama trying to said that he only worked 5 hours by the Rezko firm, what he's doing is trying to change the fact that he knew Rezko for 15 years, he was one of this big fundrisers, worked in his firm, and even after knowing he was about to be indicted he decided to make a deal on the house; now that is bad judgement!
You can tell Obama has not answer for the hard question, like his pattern on voting "present" in Illinois or avoiding and skipping the hard votes in the US Congress. He can't have it both ways, vote in favor of corporations or skip votes when their interest are at stake and the claim he lead or criticize his opponents for taking position even tho they are unpopular.
Obama probably got very used to soon to the positive press and lack of criticism and tho he was in a congeniality contest, tho he knows that his surrogates have been attacking Edwards and Hillary from the beginning, now is time for him to answer questions, so far he hasn't been good at it and looks awful when they put him on the spot!

Doug Barth   January 22nd, 2008 11:36 am ET

All three looked really strong. The Dems are going to come out of this with a great nominee.

Nick, Austin, TX   January 22nd, 2008 11:26 am ET

I can't see how anyone saw last night as a good night for Hillary. I started out not very fond of her or giving her the Clintons' third term but since that time she has started to win me over. In the various debates (of which I have watched every single one) she has shown me she is smart, capable, sometimes funny, tough and possibly a good future president.

That being said I was so disapointed with how she acted in the debate last night. She could have started with real issues about Obama but she went with the thing about him saying "he liked Republican ideas" which he obviously if you actually saw the piece, didn't say.

I am also very uncomfortable with how she switches between taking credit for her time since '92 (she refrenced "16 years" I think three times last night) and neglecting to account for failures made durring his time. Also if she is saying she was such an active part of his decisions that she can take credit for that experiance then isn't that saying we are voting also for Bill Clinton to have that much of a say in her administration and isn't that a problem for a country where we don't live under royal family rule.

One other thing is that I don't really think she can take the progressive mantle until she addresses her husbands centrism durring his time. If her husband had been a "fighter" I don't think we would have ended up with the idiotic "Don't ask don't tell" policy or the watered down gun control laws or any number of weak center ideas.

I like Bill Clinton and I like Hillary Clinton. I want to feel good if I decide to vote for her but with the way she is playing the game this last week and in the debate it is making it hard for me to support her even in a general election if she comes up against someone reasonable like McCain (and I am an ultra-liberal democrat so that is saying a lot).

I think she has lots of strengths and should use those instead of playing the childish cards I think she is playing.

Obama I wish hadn't acted the way he acted last night either. I like him quite a bit as well and was disapointed by much of what he said as well.

When it started I had three Democrats I felt good with (I had liked Biden too) and now I feel the only one who has been talking about his own ideas is John Edwards who I really might vote for now (even if he can't win) if Obama and Clinton can't get back to the point.

Kevin   January 22nd, 2008 11:23 am ET

I didnt understand Edwards going after Obama for is present voting record. according to Project Vote Smart Edwards has not shown up to over thirty votes in around 150. How is not showing up to vote any different then showing up and choicing not to take a side. At least Obama had the respect of his office and the people that put him in it to show up.

rajendra ram   January 22nd, 2008 11:17 am ET

Obama handled the arguments very comfortably. Some of you guys here, are great KOOL AID drinkers. Your perception of the facts are the same waty that Hillary distorts them. Obama is a very intelligent person and his process of thinking are carefully expressed, Unlike, Clinton and Edwards who are percipitating the facts which are out of context. Hillar's health care plan need tremendous funding and how will she and edwards fund this. You the people will face this burden and I hope you are ready for this. Some of you really forget how both the Clintons tried to berate Obama, and many times distorting the facts. So it is not appropriate to counter-attack them ????Obama did the right thing. He did not fumble as many of you are saying, he provided the right info. cleverly. In some way he may be a bit slow in his presentation, but he did put forward his message.
We will never have someone like this, again. I will vote for him in the Primar, but if he is not nominated I will vote Republican
Raj

Chioces2008   January 22nd, 2008 11:16 am ET

It is amazing that Obama and HIS TEAN have soooo keenly put this election into a battle between "African" American interests vs the forefront of American Interests… Our Nation's position in the world economy effects OUR Country, Our People, Our Futures, Not just "His" making history and bringing a new "face" as the LEADER to bringing our nation out of the most horrific position we have ever been in.

BARAK DOES NOT HAVE THE EXPERIENCE OF GOVERNMENT - HE DOES NOT HAVE THE POLITICAL POWER TO ACTUALLY EFFECT CHANGE!

WE DO NOT NEED ANOTHER "FACE" WHILE OTHERS ARE WORKING BEHIND THE SCENES ON AGENDAS THAT ARE NOT IN OUR COUNTRY'S LONG TERM INTERESTS!

I WANT A PRESIDENT THAT DOES NOT HAVE TO LEARN WHERE THE BATHROOM IS, MUCH LESS THE PROTOCOLS IN THE "SITUATION ROOMS" OVERSEEING OUR NATION'S PROBLEMS!

WAKE UP AMERICA! WE DO NOT NEED ANOTHER GEORGE BUSH SHRUG-OFF "OH, OKAY" GUY IN THE WHITE HOUSE!

Katy   January 22nd, 2008 11:11 am ET

I surely don't want Bush-Clinton-Bush and Clinton again. I will vote for the best candidate who last name is not Clinton. Awake and think deeply, American. It is time for new change and America must be strong and get back the respect from the world. Also, America must be united and strong and ready to deal with giant Red - China. Be prepared if Hillary is president, we will see more and more "made in China" and more and more jobs will be exported to China & oversea. Has any one think about China contribution to Hillary's campaign? Legacy is legacy and past is past. It is time for change and move forward. Clinton is legacy and past. Do you want Bill Clinton to be one of our Supreme Court? She will nominate him as reward.

Pravin   January 22nd, 2008 11:10 am ET

It is really unfortunate that Obama did not realized the feelings that strong Democrats have against President Ronald Regan and his political philosophy. He gave Mr. Clinton an opening and she has successfully slammed him. I think this a major blow to his credibility with Democrats like me, who work tirelessly at the local and state level compete with Republicans to get Democrats elected. When you add this to his constant mantra of compromising with Republican neocons, make us wonder about his core values.

Rhonda   January 22nd, 2008 11:07 am ET

If HC & JE would stop interrupting Obama and allow him to finish his statements, perhaps some of you who felt that he did not answer to your satisfaction would have heard the answer. I think that is a tactic people play when they make accussations, and then talk all over the person prohibitng that person from giving you the answer.

The democratic party is in just as much trouble as the republican party. If we keep this back and forth, where will it get us in November.

Bill Clinton needs to chill, and now I believe that it is He, who is actually running for president. Hillary has no experience. She is running on her husbands record. She did not have security entrance as first lady. What policies did she pass while in the White House, she could not get health care passed. She was just the first lady.

Clinton supporters or loyal to Bill, and that spills over to Hillary.

We need to really THINK Loyalty over Honesty in government

PatElly   January 22nd, 2008 11:07 am ET

Obama made a big mistake attacking Hillary, he left an impression he was like everyone else and not this picture of being the one to "unifiy" the parties. He looked unpresidential and not like a leader–fustrated and out of sync. Hillary stood her ground and responded like a leader–poised, knowledgeable and ready to lead. Step aside men, here she comes whether you like it or not!!!…

Dennis   January 22nd, 2008 11:06 am ET

Whether Obama or Clinton win Democratic nod, it will guarantee Republican president… If the choice was just those two, there is no way I would ever vote for Clinton. It is sad, because although this country needs a change from the existing, those two will further another 4 years of Republican rule. So recession here we come!

Anonymous   January 22nd, 2008 11:03 am ET

I can't see how people can think that Obama is ready to be President of such a great country. For crying out loud he's only been a Senator for what three years? How can someone with that little experience be ready to run such a great country? Wake up people this is like getting another GW to run this country. My pick is Hillary. She has the experience to run this country and run it well.
I'll give Obama this prop though, he's an educated man and well spoken, but then again good speeches cannot run a country. Hillary has the know how. John Edwards did very well last night. I think Hillary will win and it will be her choice to pick Obama or Edwards to be her vice and when she choose, she must choose wisely.

AKB   January 22nd, 2008 11:03 am ET

Raising the spectre of Rezko and his "present" votes, he is finally being seen for what he is - a regular, typical politician.

Bob H   January 22nd, 2008 11:03 am ET

I am a New Hampshire voter who voted for Edwards. One can see by the debate last night why I did.

Joe   January 22nd, 2008 10:52 am ET

I cannot believe that NO ONE questions Obama about anything. Just because you can talk the talk, doesn't mean you can walk the walk. He is far from presidential. He has no clear cut direction in his policy and he has always taken the easy way out by not being decisive on important decisions…especially where the Democratic Party is concerned.

And if you think he hasn't made this a Racial issue… HE HAS.. quit pointing fingers elsewhere he is as much to blame about making race an issue as any one else.

As far as the economy …. I would gladly embrace 8 more years of a Clinton White House over the status quo … it was the first president to have the balls to shut down the government if congress (A REPUBLICAN ONE I MIGHT ADD) did not balance the budget.

We don't need a pretty boy president we need experience and we need someone who is going to be extremely tough .. and he is a big Wimp the Republican's will eat him alive if he emerged as the Ticket choice. If you all can't see that you are completely blind.

Hillbilly Bob   January 22nd, 2008 10:52 am ET

As a white man, after this debate I can perfectly well understand why all my fellow Black Americans (both men AND women) will vote for Obama (and, yes, I will join them and even ask all my white buddies to do the same).. The same finger that once angrily declared that he "did not have sex with that woman" is now wagging behind-the-scenes against Obama, spreading all kinds of nasty rumors, innuendo and political filth. What Clintons are doing is the good old character assassination tactics they are so adept at. After seeing Hillary Clinton's anger-contorted face in yesterday's debate, I don't see how anyone - black OR white OR yellow could vote for Senator Clinton. The only person who will benefit from Hillary Clinton's nomination is Carl Rove, which would be a catastrophe for ALL Americans - both black AND white. Run, Obama, run…don't let them Vince Foster you. You have my vote. God speed and God bless.

tberry325   January 22nd, 2008 10:37 am ET

I watched the debates last night with mixed feelings.

I am a life long democrate and the pride I had at the start of this campaign for the 2008 democratic nomination has been deminished by all the back and forth between the candidates.

Due to the Clinton's desire to win the Whitehouse no matter the cost to the party - they have successfully knocked Barrack down to their level. I know this is par for the course in politics, however I just hoped once we could have a campaign that focused on the issues and the country. When their backs were against the wall in NH we saw the Clinton machine go into action and said and did whatever it took to smear Obama. For weeks now, he has been on the defense trying to put forth the truth vs the lies the distortions the Clintons have put into the mix. He had no choice but to stand up last night and show he could take them on - however in doing so, it was not the best night for the Party.

I am proud of the campaign he has tried to run and I wish him well, however my feeling is that the machine will win - IT ALWAYS has.

BUT I AM ONE DEMOCRATE WHO IS DISAPPOINTED AND FEEL THAT THE CLINTONS HAVE HURT THE PARTY AND OUR CHANCE FOR A WIN IN 2008. THEY MAYBE ABLE TO DISTORT OBAMA'S RECORD, BUT THE REP WILL NOT HAVE MERCY WHEN IT COMES TO REMINDING ALL OF US WHAT THE CLINTON YEARS WERE REALLY ABOUT - FULL OF INVESTIGATIONS AND LIES.

I FOR ONE WILL NOT VOTE FOR HILLARY CLINTON IF SHE IS THE CANDIDATE. IF THIS MEANS THE REP WIN - SO BE IT.

Jan   January 22nd, 2008 10:29 am ET

In last nights debate, Hillary was poised and had a good sense of humor over some of the nonsense being put in front of her. Enough with the Black and female voter questions. Oh, by the way, YES, Bill WAS the first Black President! What a ridiculous question to ask. What does that have to do with what these candidates stand for?

Mike   January 22nd, 2008 9:17 am ET

I think the headline says it all - Clinton is not the one.

Mike   January 22nd, 2008 8:34 am ET

I lost alot of respect for John Edwards after this debate. I was hoping he could win. But he is so desperate now that he has turned to the dark side and joined Clinton, obviously hoping to be her VP. I will not vote for any ticket that has Clinton on it.

DWLesch   January 22nd, 2008 8:30 am ET

I am afraid that if Hillary Clinton is elected we are going to see total grid lock and all voting will again be along party lines. We need somebody that the opposition party does not hate and might be willing to work with and that is not Hillary Clinton.

I am tired of all the party fighting and getting no where. The worst part is that the majority of the party members don't care what you or I think.

laila   January 22nd, 2008 7:13 am ET

The truth of the matter is that Sen. Clinton was a board member to Wal-mart for six years and that the Walton family played a huge role in her husband’s political career. For this help Arkansas Gov. (and later President) Bill Clinton assisted Wal-mart when it came to the free trade agreement known as NAFTA. In addition, Sen. Clinton’s Rose Law Firm even handled much of Wal-marts legal defense.

Perhaps it is time for someone to publicly question her about her connection to Wal-mart and ask for straight answers.

Jane   January 22nd, 2008 7:12 am ET

"Truth is Obama will win SC and Hillary will come in a dissappointing 3rd place
She will have to pick herself up for Super Tuesday.
Senator Edwards won this debate and would probably win all the debates until he drops out of the race for a second time.
Super Tuesday will be interesting,Obama is obviously a formidable opponent, and it would be interesting to see the outcome."

Fabulous!! I completely agree!! MY VOTE IS FOR OBAMA!!

Ron Az   January 22nd, 2008 5:06 am ET

Here you go again!! saying Barack is the front runner, the caucus in SC hasn't even run yet and Schnider is telling us who is the winner!!!! I believe all of you political analysts need to stop trying to sway the American people who to vote for and just shut up and report just whats happening, don't try to help, its obvious that you are not very good at your jobs.

jake   January 22nd, 2008 4:54 am ET

Obama go go go home, Hillary go go go to the White House

gideon   January 22nd, 2008 4:35 am ET

I think its the army(barack obama) against two. people say that he was given more time in the debate i say thats not true, if it seemed to be so then i should think it was because he was speaking way better than his rivals. sc is a win tucked on baracks belt move on guys.

j   January 22nd, 2008 3:25 am ET

y doesn't anyone at cnn give obama a hard time…lets ask him hows he going to pay for everything and what exactly his plans are for healthcare. Call him out on his weaknesses.

Ginny CA   January 22nd, 2008 12:57 am ET

Bill, How can you possibly say that the debate clearly showed Obama as the front runner? (Unless you were basing your assessment on the fact that tonight's audience obviously favored him.) His answers were confusing at best, he started the dust-up with Hillary by firing a shot at her (Wal-Mart) and she fired back (Rezko) This seemed to put him on the defensive and he wasted time groping around trying to find his footing. More time was wasted when answering questions: he stammered and stated facts and statistics that we already knew before coming out with anything remotely substantial. In fact, I fell asleep twice as he droned on in an overly long attempt to explain something or other. (Sorry, I can't say what it was as I was asleep.)

Bottom line: he's stumbling and appears to be in over his head. I mean, his performance wasn't terrible, just weak. He may win South Carolina but I'm not even totally convinced of that. Hillary was strong, and Edwards did very well, also. In fact, as far as tonight's debate went, I would rate it: First Clinton, Second Edwards, Third Obama.

andrea benini   January 22nd, 2008 12:43 am ET

hillary was always in charge

Andrew   January 22nd, 2008 12:16 am ET

Truth is Obama will win SC and Hillary will come in a dissappointing 3rd place
She will have to pick herself up for Super Tuesday.
Senator Edwards won this debate and would probably win all the debates until he drops out of the race for a second time.
Super Tuesday will be interesting,Obama is obviously a formidable opponent, and it would be interesting to see the outcome

anti obama   January 21st, 2008 11:43 pm ET

Nevada: 85% blacks obama; 35% white; less than that hispanics

anti obama   January 21st, 2008 11:38 pm ET

Only hillary 08

Anti Clintons   January 21st, 2008 11:38 pm ET

Vic las veagas NV, boy are youstupid or is that normal for you! Hitlery LOST, LOST. LoST! she lost her mind like you have. Obama kicked her fat butt all over the stage boy!

Go Obama

Mauri, Hitlery couldn't beat a stick if it stood it still! You lib freak!

1971guy   January 21st, 2008 11:17 pm ET

good speaking does not a good president make…

OBAMA(VOTER)   January 21st, 2008 11:15 pm ET

i think obama held it togethor but he was shaky, so people get nervous, im just glad he stuck to his ideas, instead of hillary bickering about NOTHING

OBAMA-08

peter   January 21st, 2008 11:14 pm ET

do mister Clinton belive that an african american president is a fairy tale?

Vic Las Vegas, Nevada   January 21st, 2008 11:14 pm ET

Hillary Clinton clearly won this debate.

Obama didn't answer any of the questions that were controvercial.

He himmed and hawwwed and looked pitiful.

And his constant whining about running against both Bill and Hillary…

This is so NOT THE PICTURE OF A WORLD LEADER.

Hillary Clinton WON, WON, WON!

Marla   January 21st, 2008 11:10 pm ET

Barack has an impressive resume but at this point in time, he is not the most qualified candidate to be the leader of the free world. What is currently destroying the middle class is the war in Iraq, the cost of healthcare, the cost of gasoline and the slump in the housing market. Hillary has definite plans for making change and improvements, she does not consistently tell everyone we need change. WE ALREADY KNOW WE NEED CHANGE. We want specifics! Hillary is providing real details, not rhetoric. Barack has a gift for bringing people out, Hillary has the programs to put that power to work!

Gene   January 21st, 2008 11:07 pm ET

You've got to be kidding. Obama may seem the front-runner to you in SC, but the people of SC are smarter than you give them credit for. I think Hillary has found herself a possible running mate and Obama will be out in the cold.

Basquale   January 21st, 2008 10:57 pm ET

You will all be losers. McCain will be the third Bush term which Americans will vote for. Sadly. Sadly. Obama is your chance not only for you but the rest of the World. Take it or leave it!

Marcy   January 21st, 2008 10:57 pm ET

Obama did good job in SC. Especially considering that many of the questions were race-centered….under the guise of it being MLK day. (yeah….right) I mean, we don't see CNN covering "Gender and Politics 2008″ now do we?

One thing for sure, if I was in Hillary's camp right now, I'd be cringing a little after that slanderous "slum lord" comment ….or about the fact that she was BOOed!

Poor Edwards is just trying to stay in the game any way he can.

Farrell, Houston, Tx   January 21st, 2008 10:56 pm ET

People don't plan to give the Clintons a "free pass" as they have always received. They aren't afraid to vote NO to the Clintons, no free pass this time. The Clintons are legally out of boundaries and can't be stopped legally, but saying NO vote will stop them.

Jack ny, ny   January 21st, 2008 10:56 pm ET

omg people are talking healthcare, recession and Obama comes in with that. It is almost beauty contest question. save the world. bring peace,
__________________________________________________________________
Jack January 21, 2008 9:29 pm ET

Obama is on his strongest point right now…………speaking about unifying all the races of the country

marge   January 21st, 2008 10:50 pm ET

Obama is definitley one of the 'front runner's",like it or not. I think his 38 delegates should be proof of that.
Hillary and Bill Clinton can also attest to that. I keep hearing Hillary and other people talking about "Her Experience". Is she refering to the 8 years she spent in the WH as the first lady? Or her stint as a Senator?
Not any of the 3 have first hand Presidental experience.
John Edwards, is trying to get in where ever he can fit in. He's not showing well at all. Maybe SC will help him turn it around.
As far as the GOP field being too much for Senator Obama…with their ties to Bush,its doubtful that they can do more than defend themselves for supporting the President.
These Republican candidates are as worried about distancing themselves from the Bush administration as they are pandering for money and votes.
Obama doesn't need to go to debate camp. Bush has been in office for almost 8 years, and he doesn't even exercise common sense. he could never be a poster boy for Intelligence,now could he.

Susan-VA   January 21st, 2008 10:50 pm ET

Linda, that is exactly it. WE DO NOT NEED A RE-RUN OF THE SAME OLD POLITICS FULL OF SCANDALS. WE NEED CHANGE AND OBAMA IS THE MAN WHO CAN BRING ABOUT THAT REFRESHING CHANGE!

Becky Montgomery   January 21st, 2008 10:50 pm ET

If Hillary is so good with health care reform, why didn't her plan work? It was so bad that it never was even enacted. I can't believe she continues to argue that she knows what to do.

If she goes up against the Republicans, they will throw that in her face EVERY time. After they question her "35 years of experience."

Greg   January 21st, 2008 10:49 pm ET

There was a third candidate on the stage, right? I'm a bit disgusted at how coverage and commentary on CNN is turning this into the Clinton/Obama special.

Belle   January 21st, 2008 10:49 pm ET

I hope that Obama is not the front runner. He fails to provide specifics or when questioned on the few he does provide, he changes his stance. He is also very condescending to his opponents and anyone who disagrees with him. Haven't we already proven with Bush that substance does matter?

Tony Elswick   January 21st, 2008 10:48 pm ET

Bill Clinton is on the trilateral commission!! GOOGLE IT!!!

SAM   January 21st, 2008 10:47 pm ET

Obama did very well and clearly won his debate, Hillary know by now that whe can no continuously try and explain what an orator has said, only the orator can explain himself. Obama is ready to lead and has the experience to prove it:

- Was a grassroots community organizer in Chicago beginning in l985, where he became a community organizer with a church-based group seeking to improve living conditions in poor neighborhoods plagued with crime and high unemployment.

- Attended Harvard and was president of the Harvard Law Review.

- Project VOTE organizer in 1992, where 120,000 new voters were registered.

- Worked as a Civil Rights Attorney, fighting for the rights of everyone.

- Lectured on Constitutional Law at the University of Chicago (for ten Years).

- Elected to the Illinois State Senate in 1994 (served eight years).

- Elected to the US Senate in 2004.

- Was one of few elected officials (Illinois State Senator) who publicly and courageously spoke out (before the Iraq war began); in opposition to the presidential preemptive war powers and the plan to attack Iraq.

The Clinton campaign is built to divide and detour and conquer, with personal attacks, innuendos and untruths, rather than debating the issues and differences and advantages that may exist. What really bothers me is that the Clintons don't seem to care that their tactics are divisive and detrimental to race relations, well so much for the Clinton’s love of America, race relations and unity, they have proven themselves to be dividers, and the debris of this lands this month during the celebration of Martin Luther Kings celebration month and amidst the pictures on TV of white supremacist walking around in Jena Louisiana with lynches in their hands, yes this day in over 40 years from the Civil Right movement, January 21, 2008.

Hillary has voted wrong on the war and several different bills, Bill Clinton brought us NAFTA which has caused Americans hundreds of thousands of jobs and is threatening to destroy the middle class. Obama is ready, he has the foresight and knows how to make the right choices for America, Obama is a uniter and can successfully negotiate across the aisles, boarders and oceans of the world, Obama is the one.

Kim   January 21st, 2008 10:45 pm ET

What is going on with the Bill and Hillary???? Can we stick to facts and stop attacking others with smoking mirrors?

And why do we have two Clintons running for office? Maybe someone needs to tell Bill he is not running for the presidency.

jerry   January 21st, 2008 10:44 pm ET

Hillary was thoughtful, poised, and had great listening skills (did you notice practically all the time she would turn towards Obama or Edwards as they spoke and looked them directly in the eye, as they would look down, or away as she spoke).

Go Hillary.

Barack turned me off tonight. Edwards did make a lot of sense in the poverty argument, could make a good VP (although I am a bigger fan
of Bill Richardson who seems to be the least polarizing and most experienced choice.)

Rob---CO   January 21st, 2008 10:42 pm ET

Barack most decidedly will win S.C. , check the polls. I very much want Obama to win the presidency. Interesting paradox, though how can he give such an inspirational speech after winning Iowa, and then totally back-pedaling in his responses tonight. Hopefully Obama learns from tonight's debate and debates more persuasively in the head-to-head. Obama prez, Edwards vp.

Mauri   January 21st, 2008 10:41 pm ET

Tonight, we saw the making of a Madam President! She may have gotten boo-ed, but by the time the debate ended, every one knew who was telling the truth — and you know, sometimes the truth hurts. After tonight's debate, there should be no doubt about who can beat the Republicans, and we feel so much better about the presidential race now.

Thanks, CNN.

Linda   January 21st, 2008 10:41 pm ET

Obama for change! We don't want a re-run of the old politics with the Clintons. Obama wins!

Susan, MI   January 21st, 2008 10:40 pm ET

Um…Hello, CNN. Hillary Clinton has won a caucus and a primary; Obama has won one caucus. Additionally, Michigan's delegates–or at least a percentage of them–may still be heard at the Democratic convention. And she won MI, too. (By the way, there are a lot of voters in MI who, after Obama and Edwards signed affidavits to take their names off in order to curry favor with voters in Iowa and New Hampshire, will not vote for either of them if nominated).

CNN, you are trashy. You purposely asked questions that would result in a Jerry Springer-like event. You strayed from issues and asked questions that were not relevant and, as result, you did a disservice to the people of South Carolina. You are the Brittany Spears of news broadcasting. Sooner or later, your unprofessional antics and blatant biasness will undermine your position in news broadcasting.

Susan-VA   January 21st, 2008 10:33 pm ET

The Clintons are so full of themselves. We do not need another Clinton administration full of nothing but SCANDALS and dishonesty!!! Get real!! We need someone who will unite the country, not divide it further!

Obama for Predsident   January 21st, 2008 10:29 pm ET

Obama is definitely the front runner, that is why Clinton is spending all of her time trying to discredit him instead of focusing on what she plans on doing in the white house.

Blaine   January 21st, 2008 10:24 pm ET

I think that John Edwards looked really good tonight, because Hillary and Obama just kept squabbling.

Obama needs to stay above that mess that Hillary is trying to pull him into. Please Obama let her look bad on her own.

Beth   January 21st, 2008 10:23 pm ET

Obama got creamed!!He thought by coming in attacking clinton and edwards would work…He looked defensive and arrogant…Remember Obama tonight threw out the first personal attack..

Thomas   January 21st, 2008 10:22 pm ET

Obama is not the forerunner. He is a rhetorician. He does not provide direct answers to questions and he usually just provides "anticipated" safe language in his conversations. Further, as an African-American male, I DO NOT believe that fellow members of my race should vote for Obama just because he is black. He has to prove his experience. And in my opinion and according to his record, he lacks the experience and the wisdom to be President.

Marla   January 21st, 2008 10:22 pm ET

If Barack Obama is truly serious about doing what is best for America, he will realize that it is not his time. As said before, if he is flustered by Hillary and John's remarks, what will he do against the Republican hate machine? He needs to do some soul searching and realize he will do America more justice by not splitting up the Democratic party. Take that positive energy and apply it to a united front towards electing Hillary. There is nothing the Republicans can attack her on that she hasn't been through before. Obama is too new and too vulnerable to their lies and smear campaigning tactics. This is our last chance folks to get things straight!

brian singleton Michigan   January 21st, 2008 10:19 pm ET

Can someone PLEASE!! explain to me how everyone thinks hillary has the most experience???? (is it because she was sleeping with the pres?) no seriously, I believe they are or were lawyers then senators… what extra posision does she hold… no pun intended

Gary   January 21st, 2008 10:18 pm ET

Obama is so illogical, grasping for words all the time. Very inexperienced!

He went to the office not voting or having a stand on issues, voted for just being present. This shows how he is inexperienced and not committed to issues. He needs to stand on alot of issues, he needs experiences!

Hillary Clinton is a true leader, unafraid to take issues and risk. Go Hillary!

Carter   January 21st, 2008 10:16 pm ET

Bill, I agree that Obama IS the FRONTRUNNER!!! Go Obama!! As an African American candidate, he has to be particularly careful about his TONE, rhetoric, actions, and facial expressions! He is deliberate in not being too confrontational, but he IS very effective in answering questions and defending his points.

SC Dem   January 21st, 2008 10:16 pm ET

Democrats need to support a candidate who can win in November! Divisiveness will destroy the hope of making fundamental, crucial change in this country.

Mark   January 21st, 2008 10:15 pm ET

I guess we all forgot Clinton's Lame adminstration! The only people he helped was himself! I think that Edwards does not get the attention he deserves. I'm voting for the GOP!! I'm sick of the Democrats in-fighting, like always, I was looking forward to the CHANGE but it's just more of the same, did we all forget how Bil Clinton got the name SLICK WILLIE, he's doing it again this time his puppet is HILLIARY. I'm SICK OF THE CLINTON'S and the DEMOCRAT's, they are taking race relations back 50 years. GO McCain!!!!

Nahan   January 21st, 2008 10:14 pm ET

Marky that what we don't need. More swift boat tactics. Man can we get past that crap. Maybe Obama can.

Morgan   January 21st, 2008 10:13 pm ET

They Edwards and Clinton…pounded Obama, which was very good for him. Edwards really needs to just go away. Its pretty clear he is a pawn. As far as the entire debate it just solidifies my support for Obama. He took a pounding, he didn't look good all the time but who does? That's what makes him my choice, You probably won't hear him crying to the media about being ganged up on like Hillary and Bill Clinton did.

Carter   January 21st, 2008 10:13 pm ET

Bill, I agree that Obama IS the FRONTRUNNER!!! Go Obama!! As an African American candidate, he has to be particularly careful about his TONE, rhetoric, actions, and facial expressions! He is deliberate in not being too confrontational, but he IS very effective in answering questions and defending his points.

Susan   January 21st, 2008 10:13 pm ET

Great idea — Clinton/Edwards 08

nathan   January 21st, 2008 10:12 pm ET

Same old politics by Hillary. Bill was great at that crap. And Hillary is of the same mold. Man I hated it during the Bush/Kerry election and here we go again.

Temple   January 21st, 2008 10:11 pm ET

Why is CNN favoring Obama and not digging into the real issues with him??

Dennis   January 21st, 2008 10:10 pm ET

Obama did a great gob explaining himself and I think he will be the stronger candidate for president.

Nathan, Melbourne, Victoria   January 21st, 2008 10:10 pm ET

Is anyone getting sick of Obama's stutter? People say he's articulate. Can you imagine JFK…. Ask n..n..not wh…wh….what you. ca…ca can do for yo…your country. Obama will get wiped by any Republican except for Hickabee, I mean Huckabee. So naive Barack, they say he's the black candidate, but I reackon he's the green candidate. Not up to it.

Temple   January 21st, 2008 10:09 pm ET

Obama is too sure of himself and is not experienced enough to be President of USA

Roy   January 21st, 2008 10:08 pm ET

Well … It just goes to show … That it takes a Clinton and an Edwards beat the best … Yes all you Clinton/Edwards supporters …. Its Obama …..

Fayth   January 21st, 2008 10:08 pm ET

Go Hillary…..
I for one miss the 90's.. and my house making me money.. Im sure America will wake up before Feb 5th and do whats right… She will Break the ceiling for all American's to run in 2016…

kuhrdan1   January 21st, 2008 10:06 pm ET

Senator Obama obfuscates behind rhetoric. He is blathering in generalities. But oh if a woman is capable of being agressive and states in clear, precise terms, such responses is viewed with negativity. And if one's memory is bit more accurate, it was Senator Obama who started dishing it by referencing President Clinton, as an ever so negative reference, in his repsonses. It sexism at its best and I am speaking from a male perspective.

Marie   January 21st, 2008 10:06 pm ET

Did Obama answer any question? Every chance he gets he repeats his speech. He is NOT ready for prime-time. another disaster in the making. and I am not voting for any of them.

Paul   January 21st, 2008 10:05 pm ET

Keshia, i think you've been drinking too much coolade….Hillary may lose So. Carolina *yawn*, but it's all about Super Tuesday sweetheart…New York, New Jersey, Cal, and on and on…GAME OVER…CLINTON WINS!!! YOU DO THE MATH!!!
PEACE FROM WASHINGTON, D.C.

Betsy Wells   January 21st, 2008 10:04 pm ET

The news media has ordained Obama as the candidate–not the voters of America. I'm tired of the extraordinary attention given to Clinton & Obama by the news commentators. John Edwards should be our Presidential candidate because of his passion to solve the problems within America

rosy   January 21st, 2008 10:04 pm ET

obama.. can't talk… he just mumbles… Hillary talks.. she is the one on top… what are you talking about..

Sarabia   January 21st, 2008 10:03 pm ET

Is clear that Obama still reaching to "changes" he doesn't know how to implement, Edwards has been very articulate and composed, but Hillary, might be the only candidate able to win the presidential race. One more point, is bad to try to use MLK as a base to win afro-american votes, if you want equality quit talking about race.

Ed   January 21st, 2008 10:03 pm ET

Is John Edwards scoring points with anyone tonight?

diana   January 21st, 2008 10:02 pm ET

i just do not see obama as the frontrunner. i see him as a bully and very defensive. he must win this debate, its crucial for him. obama's record for not doing well in the debates is well known.

hillary speaks experience and is presidential. hillary clearly has won the debate.

unidos con hillary

Rsbd11474   January 21st, 2008 10:02 pm ET

Will somebody please tell me how and what Barach Obama has done to run for President? I know of not one significant thing that he can lay claim to.
All I hear is that he is for change, Change what and please tell me how he plans to Change anything. Where are his political cohorts on both sides of the aisle?
He is so inexperienced it is ridiculous. He is an empty suit.

Venus   January 21st, 2008 10:02 pm ET

Obama was thoughtful and intelligently answered questions as well as barbs that have been thrown at him thoughout the week. He's an intellectual. He pauses because he actually THINKS before he speaks. For those of you who missed it, he answered re: the "present" votes, rewind your TiVo.

Think hard before you throw away your vote for HRC. Many don't want a defacto third term for Bill and they are incredibly divisive. Just remember who lied to the American people under oath. Once a liar, always a liar. It will rear it's ug