<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Schneider: Obama&#039;s post-partisan message</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/</link>
	<description>All politics, all the time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:07:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott Wolfram</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-313875</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Wolfram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-313875</guid>
		<description>The Democratic Party is about progressive movement towards a better future.  I am a registered and long-time Democrat, but after Hillary&#039;s embracing of the Republican tactic of deep fear mongering, there are two results.  Nationally, the Republicans must be delighted to see the Democratic party being ripped apart.  Personally,  I will NOT VOTE FOR HILLARY in the fall Presidential Election, skipping my vote for the first time my life.  This madness has to stop!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Democratic Party is about progressive movement towards a better future.  I am a registered and long-time Democrat, but after Hillary's embracing of the Republican tactic of deep fear mongering, there are two results.  Nationally, the Republicans must be delighted to see the Democratic party being ripped apart.  Personally,  I will NOT VOTE FOR HILLARY in the fall Presidential Election, skipping my vote for the first time my life.  This madness has to stop!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anne</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-312402</link>
		<dc:creator>anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-312402</guid>
		<description>The Clintons will use everyone and everything they can to win.  Come on people, Hillary would not even be in this race if it were not for her husband, oh yeah guess thats why she stayed with him, political aspirations.She lets him be the bad guy, say all the things she wants to say, but would make her look bad and then claims he is supportive and passionate, oh give me a break.  He lied to the american people, just like taking a sip of water, he will continue to lie, that is what he knows how to do and she supports him.  If she really has been working so hard for the last 35 years in our government, wow, what a mess it is.  She needs to take responsibilty for being part of the problem and quit claiming she is part of the solution.  The solution is not more of the same crap, there needs to be a new approach to this mess.They claim insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results and that is what a vote for a Clinton is, INSANITY.  I will vote against the return of old, even if that means another republican,  at least it won&#039;t be another Clinton.  The people on here who say Hillary knows how to handle the republicans are right, she has been hanging out for a long time with them and she is part of their world, so of course she knows how to play the game, thats what is so nuts, why do you people want the game to go on and on.  Oh yeah, insanity, it really is something isn&#039;t it.  She is not about change, she is just more of the same old crap.  Maybe when your life becomes so difficult, so hard to live, you will be truely ready for change, but until then you cling to the same old, same old, hoping for different results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Clintons will use everyone and everything they can to win.  Come on people, Hillary would not even be in this race if it were not for her husband, oh yeah guess thats why she stayed with him, political aspirations.She lets him be the bad guy, say all the things she wants to say, but would make her look bad and then claims he is supportive and passionate, oh give me a break.  He lied to the american people, just like taking a sip of water, he will continue to lie, that is what he knows how to do and she supports him.  If she really has been working so hard for the last 35 years in our government, wow, what a mess it is.  She needs to take responsibilty for being part of the problem and quit claiming she is part of the solution.  The solution is not more of the same crap, there needs to be a new approach to this mess.They claim insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results and that is what a vote for a Clinton is, INSANITY.  I will vote against the return of old, even if that means another republican,  at least it won't be another Clinton.  The people on here who say Hillary knows how to handle the republicans are right, she has been hanging out for a long time with them and she is part of their world, so of course she knows how to play the game, thats what is so nuts, why do you people want the game to go on and on.  Oh yeah, insanity, it really is something isn't it.  She is not about change, she is just more of the same old crap.  Maybe when your life becomes so difficult, so hard to live, you will be truely ready for change, but until then you cling to the same old, same old, hoping for different results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brattleboro, VT</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-311780</link>
		<dc:creator>Brattleboro, VT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-311780</guid>
		<description>If you think ruling a country is a gain that some people know and can play well because they&#039;ve been there for a while, you&#039;ll just have your eyes to cry. The world is no more what it was 10 years ago, so we need something different. If you think I am wrong, let&#039;s try your choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you think ruling a country is a gain that some people know and can play well because they've been there for a while, you'll just have your eyes to cry. The world is no more what it was 10 years ago, so we need something different. If you think I am wrong, let's try your choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynthia St. Louis</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-311308</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia St. Louis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-311308</guid>
		<description>I am so tired of Hillary&#039;s boasting of her fights with the &quot;Republicans&quot; and &quot;BILLARY&quot;S&quot; eagerness to get in the mud and fight some more- same old hateful, divisive, stupid politics.

Is this what our country needs?  Is this what our country wants?

Obama 08</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am so tired of Hillary's boasting of her fights with the "Republicans" and "BILLARY"S" eagerness to get in the mud and fight some more- same old hateful, divisive, stupid politics.</p>
<p>Is this what our country needs?  Is this what our country wants?</p>
<p>Obama 08</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack ny, ny</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-311282</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack ny, ny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-311282</guid>
		<description>Were CNN analyst watching the same debate like rest of us. Obama was terrible with his stuttering, pausing and babbling. I had my brother visiting who never follows these kind of thing. When he saw Obama his first reaction. &quot;that guy is not presidential at all. Why is he in this race anyways?. So that is fair observation, rest of us have our favorite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Were CNN analyst watching the same debate like rest of us. Obama was terrible with his stuttering, pausing and babbling. I had my brother visiting who never follows these kind of thing. When he saw Obama his first reaction. "that guy is not presidential at all. Why is he in this race anyways?. So that is fair observation, rest of us have our favorite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-311147</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-311147</guid>
		<description>Barack Hussein Obama loves those republicans so much he should just join them

Come down to earth man... do you really think all those Republicans who wants him elected is really going to vote for a guy name Hussein in the general election when the country is still at war with Saddam Hussein&#039;s Iraq.

We are talking about Republicans right - the same once just less than 3 years ago managed to swift boat a war hero like john kerry and max cleland. 
Can you imagine what they will do to Barack Hussein. They have not even started to attack him. at least with clinton the right wing has been attacking her for the last 16 years and she has stood up to them and still standing she knows how to handle them and she is ready to handle them. 

Bill Maher is right when he says democrats really do know how to loose elections. they vote from their hearts for &quot;hope&quot; not from ther brains. For once lets be smart about this beacuse come September - November it is gonna be too late to scratch your heads and say what happened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barack Hussein Obama loves those republicans so much he should just join them</p>
<p>Come down to earth man... do you really think all those Republicans who wants him elected is really going to vote for a guy name Hussein in the general election when the country is still at war with Saddam Hussein's Iraq.</p>
<p>We are talking about Republicans right &#8211; the same once just less than 3 years ago managed to swift boat a war hero like john kerry and max cleland.<br />
Can you imagine what they will do to Barack Hussein. They have not even started to attack him. at least with clinton the right wing has been attacking her for the last 16 years and she has stood up to them and still standing she knows how to handle them and she is ready to handle them. </p>
<p>Bill Maher is right when he says democrats really do know how to loose elections. they vote from their hearts for "hope" not from ther brains. For once lets be smart about this beacuse come September &#8211; November it is gonna be too late to scratch your heads and say what happened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-310949</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-310949</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a republican and  I would consider voting for Obama; only consider it, however,  I would never vote for HRC.  I&#039;ve never heard any republicans say they&#039;d vote for HRC.  Half of the democrats hate HRC, so how is she going to unite this country.  I want a United states, not a divided states.   Us republicans will come vote in record numbers to keep HRC out of the White House.  I wish democrats would use their intelligence instead of their emotions.  I constantly hear, she&#039;ll be the first woman president, he&#039;ll be the first black president.  What are your issues?  Vote on that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm a republican and  I would consider voting for Obama; only consider it, however,  I would never vote for HRC.  I've never heard any republicans say they'd vote for HRC.  Half of the democrats hate HRC, so how is she going to unite this country.  I want a United states, not a divided states.   Us republicans will come vote in record numbers to keep HRC out of the White House.  I wish democrats would use their intelligence instead of their emotions.  I constantly hear, she'll be the first woman president, he'll be the first black president.  What are your issues?  Vote on that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-310753</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-310753</guid>
		<description>Hillary has the highest negatives, and they&#039;re not going away. It was clear in the SC debate that they&#039;re as strong as ever, and why.  She&#039;s nasty, and she&#039;s willing to drag others down with her.  Obama has a good shot at creating a winning coalition.  She, by contrast, is purely partisan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary has the highest negatives, and they're not going away. It was clear in the SC debate that they're as strong as ever, and why.  She's nasty, and she's willing to drag others down with her.  Obama has a good shot at creating a winning coalition.  She, by contrast, is purely partisan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ilene</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-310706</link>
		<dc:creator>Ilene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-310706</guid>
		<description>All the democrats I know love Obama. I have not yet to this day been able to find a democrat or at least a educated one that likes Hillary. Everyone knows what a liar she is. The republicans will have a field day with her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the democrats I know love Obama. I have not yet to this day been able to find a democrat or at least a educated one that likes Hillary. Everyone knows what a liar she is. The republicans will have a field day with her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB Boston MA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-310705</link>
		<dc:creator>JB Boston MA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-310705</guid>
		<description>Yes it&#039;s working.  Hillary is running a campaign of exclusion, Obama inclusion.  

If you consider yourself a strong liberal, then you may be enticed by Hillary&#039;s message.  But keep in mind, you cannot do it without the Independants and some R&#039;s.  To say to hell with them is counterproductive, and will only divide this nation more.  

That is why so many people dislike Hillary.  Wake up people!  She cannot beat McCain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes it's working.  Hillary is running a campaign of exclusion, Obama inclusion.  </p>
<p>If you consider yourself a strong liberal, then you may be enticed by Hillary's message.  But keep in mind, you cannot do it without the Independants and some R's.  To say to hell with them is counterproductive, and will only divide this nation more.  </p>
<p>That is why so many people dislike Hillary.  Wake up people!  She cannot beat McCain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doreen IA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-310595</link>
		<dc:creator>Doreen IA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-310595</guid>
		<description>Lisen all, I feel we have three great candidates. However I think Obama, is the best man for the job. He is fresh he is not corrupted by the white house, he is about hope, a new vision for this country. Obama, is a very educated man, and you have to believe in what he can do for this country, he will not be running if he did not feel he could deliver. I ask all of you give this man a chance, he is for peace and not confusion, everyone can become a bit bitter at some point, we are all human. Regarding race, the latest polls stated whites at 72% is ready for a African- American President, 61% blacks, well for those of you who. I think it would be great to have a black president, keep in mind Hillary knows her stuff, but believe me it will not be like the 90&#039;s she is different from Bill, and through this campaign the real you come through. Don&#039;t be a bit surprise if the republicans are back in office, if Hillary is elected, they will beat her up, and we are back to square one. Trust me Obama is the man, they can&#039;t touch him, he is the future in this day and time my friends!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lisen all, I feel we have three great candidates. However I think Obama, is the best man for the job. He is fresh he is not corrupted by the white house, he is about hope, a new vision for this country. Obama, is a very educated man, and you have to believe in what he can do for this country, he will not be running if he did not feel he could deliver. I ask all of you give this man a chance, he is for peace and not confusion, everyone can become a bit bitter at some point, we are all human. Regarding race, the latest polls stated whites at 72% is ready for a African- American President, 61% blacks, well for those of you who. I think it would be great to have a black president, keep in mind Hillary knows her stuff, but believe me it will not be like the 90's she is different from Bill, and through this campaign the real you come through. Don't be a bit surprise if the republicans are back in office, if Hillary is elected, they will beat her up, and we are back to square one. Trust me Obama is the man, they can't touch him, he is the future in this day and time my friends!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Spangler, Arlington, VA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-310585</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Spangler, Arlington, VA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-310585</guid>
		<description>He is naive to think that his Changed Politics will be a winning strategy against either the Clintons or Repellicans.  He lacks the aggressive litigation and persuasion skills necessary to win and govern.  Nice won&#039;t cut it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He is naive to think that his Changed Politics will be a winning strategy against either the Clintons or Repellicans.  He lacks the aggressive litigation and persuasion skills necessary to win and govern.  Nice won't cut it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryk</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-310514</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-310514</guid>
		<description>I believe it is a mistake to underestimate Barak Obamas crossover appeal.  The country is evenly divided as the last two elections have shown.  In the general election 50% is not good enough particularly for the Democrats.  Hillary is polarizing and widely hated.  She may be insanely popular with the core of the party but that core failed to get a win in the last two elections.  Outside of the hardcore party members she is scorned.  She is probably less hated than George Bush but she is not running against him.  The possible republican opponents she could face with the exception of Huckabee can and would draw independents moderates and many Democrats.  Hillary will not.  The Republicans have a horrible field of candidates this election and many Republicans will stay home, vote third party, or even vote Democrat, but not against Hillary.  They will come to the polls by the bussload to beat her.  Against Hillary Clinton the evangelicals will come out for Romney.  The small government Republicans would support McCain and the anti-gays would support Gulliani.  However if given an appealing alternative such as Obama or better yet Edwards that wouldn&#039;t be true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe it is a mistake to underestimate Barak Obamas crossover appeal.  The country is evenly divided as the last two elections have shown.  In the general election 50% is not good enough particularly for the Democrats.  Hillary is polarizing and widely hated.  She may be insanely popular with the core of the party but that core failed to get a win in the last two elections.  Outside of the hardcore party members she is scorned.  She is probably less hated than George Bush but she is not running against him.  The possible republican opponents she could face with the exception of Huckabee can and would draw independents moderates and many Democrats.  Hillary will not.  The Republicans have a horrible field of candidates this election and many Republicans will stay home, vote third party, or even vote Democrat, but not against Hillary.  They will come to the polls by the bussload to beat her.  Against Hillary Clinton the evangelicals will come out for Romney.  The small government Republicans would support McCain and the anti-gays would support Gulliani.  However if given an appealing alternative such as Obama or better yet Edwards that wouldn't be true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sinna mani</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-310490</link>
		<dc:creator>sinna mani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-310490</guid>
		<description>The phoney war between democrats and Republicans is not the answer to current problems. We need fresh thinking on  social welfare, climate change, globalisation and religious conflict. Hillary has proved herself to be an old battle axe with very little proven capacity for new thoughts. She wants to maintain status quo at a time when we need someone who can think outside the box. A good example is the Governor of California. Unfortunately, he can not stand. Obama is the best hope for America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The phoney war between democrats and Republicans is not the answer to current problems. We need fresh thinking on  social welfare, climate change, globalisation and religious conflict. Hillary has proved herself to be an old battle axe with very little proven capacity for new thoughts. She wants to maintain status quo at a time when we need someone who can think outside the box. A good example is the Governor of California. Unfortunately, he can not stand. Obama is the best hope for America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: "Yes We Can"</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-310466</link>
		<dc:creator>"Yes We Can"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-310466</guid>
		<description>Surge,
There is evidence that Obama has cross appeal. Look at the results from Nevada causcus. he won in rural areas which as populated my republicans. most of them crossed parties to vote for him. Billary cannot bring that to the table</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surge,<br />
There is evidence that Obama has cross appeal. Look at the results from Nevada causcus. he won in rural areas which as populated my republicans. most of them crossed parties to vote for him. Billary cannot bring that to the table</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another Steve</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-310344</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 09:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-310344</guid>
		<description>I see him as the only one running that can. I&#039;m an independent and will help trash another Democratic Presidency if Hillary gets the nomination. The Clintons can not be trusted to be truthful to us. They have already divided up this country with the Bush family and I can&#039;t stand either of these families or what they are doing to this country while claiming to be patriots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see him as the only one running that can. I'm an independent and will help trash another Democratic Presidency if Hillary gets the nomination. The Clintons can not be trusted to be truthful to us. They have already divided up this country with the Bush family and I can't stand either of these families or what they are doing to this country while claiming to be patriots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Logical</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-310339</link>
		<dc:creator>Logical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-310339</guid>
		<description>First of all, Chaunda, you are not rational.  You are not even logical in your attempts to discounter Obama.  

Can someone please explain why Clinton is even believable, succeeding the years of scandal that plagued her in her Arkansas days.  She cannot even admit to refuse $ from corporate &quot;head honchos&quot; because of fear of the losses (financially, politically, and you can speculate the rest) she will take.  What other reason would someone &quot;claim to fight against these people, and then refuse to take them out (by not letting them have a say in your financing strategies after they help you get elected with their $).  Please America, think about the common sense of this.

This isn&#039;t neuroscience people.  She talks about hate toward the &quot;policies of Republicans over the last 15 years&quot;, but, if she was our PRESIDENT, why wouldn&#039;t she want to work with EVERYONE (since those Republicans DO REPRESENT nearly half of our country)?  So, why would any of us normal people believe our voices would be heard, and change would happen, if Washington with Hillary, continues to fight?  

This ready on day one thing is absurd, also.  Experience in the White House didn&#039;t help George W. either now did it?  A whole political life, full of that &quot;E-word&quot;--experience.

I firmly believe Barack Obama is tired of defending his stances, as he said himself, and tired of &quot;typical Washington campaign tactics&quot; by the Clinton&#039;s.  I feel he had to show that he was firm tonight with both competitors, but he did it in a classy way, not even comparable to the reviews Clinton is getting on that temper of hers.  He truly cares about America, and he is CHANGE WE CAN BELIEVE IN.  

Please AMERICA, don&#039;t be fooled by these typical mud-slinging tactics the Clinton&#039;s are using.  Use your intellectual, and educated sensibilities.  Thank you...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, Chaunda, you are not rational.  You are not even logical in your attempts to discounter Obama.  </p>
<p>Can someone please explain why Clinton is even believable, succeeding the years of scandal that plagued her in her Arkansas days.  She cannot even admit to refuse $ from corporate "head honchos" because of fear of the losses (financially, politically, and you can speculate the rest) she will take.  What other reason would someone "claim to fight against these people, and then refuse to take them out (by not letting them have a say in your financing strategies after they help you get elected with their $).  Please America, think about the common sense of this.</p>
<p>This isn't neuroscience people.  She talks about hate toward the "policies of Republicans over the last 15 years", but, if she was our PRESIDENT, why wouldn't she want to work with EVERYONE (since those Republicans DO REPRESENT nearly half of our country)?  So, why would any of us normal people believe our voices would be heard, and change would happen, if Washington with Hillary, continues to fight?  </p>
<p>This ready on day one thing is absurd, also.  Experience in the White House didn't help George W. either now did it?  A whole political life, full of that "E-word"&#8211;experience.</p>
<p>I firmly believe Barack Obama is tired of defending his stances, as he said himself, and tired of "typical Washington campaign tactics" by the Clinton's.  I feel he had to show that he was firm tonight with both competitors, but he did it in a classy way, not even comparable to the reviews Clinton is getting on that temper of hers.  He truly cares about America, and he is CHANGE WE CAN BELIEVE IN.  </p>
<p>Please AMERICA, don't be fooled by these typical mud-slinging tactics the Clinton's are using.  Use your intellectual, and educated sensibilities.  Thank you...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tlc</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-310273</link>
		<dc:creator>Tlc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-310273</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad that Senator Obama finally took the gloves off and proved that when people get tough he can get tough right back, showing once again that he has what it takes to lead our nation. It&#039;s about time that someone called former President Clinton on the untruths that he has been spouting during this campaign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm glad that Senator Obama finally took the gloves off and proved that when people get tough he can get tough right back, showing once again that he has what it takes to lead our nation. It's about time that someone called former President Clinton on the untruths that he has been spouting during this campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-310271</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-310271</guid>
		<description>No, he only rallys the angry people for some reason.
I am proud as heck to be a Democrat and like to say it out loud.
You can cross the isles without losing who you are and your ideals.
Hillary does this with both hands tied behind her back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, he only rallys the angry people for some reason.<br />
I am proud as heck to be a Democrat and like to say it out loud.<br />
You can cross the isles without losing who you are and your ideals.<br />
Hillary does this with both hands tied behind her back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karla</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-310240</link>
		<dc:creator>Karla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-310240</guid>
		<description>As one who continues to say that Bill Clinton is one of the most intelligent presidents, I am convinced that we do not need another Clinton in the White House.

Clinton does not reassure especially with her answer when Edwards grilled her about lobbyists&#039; influence on Washington DC.

Clinton wants healthcare etc but her old-style politics will prevent her from getting people together.  

The country does not deserve to have a president who is de facto half president only because a past president/spouse will be pinchhitting for her in tough times.  

Obama has a stronger unifying message for the Country than Edwards.  This is his edge over Edwards.  Both offer a direction that is better for 21st century America politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As one who continues to say that Bill Clinton is one of the most intelligent presidents, I am convinced that we do not need another Clinton in the White House.</p>
<p>Clinton does not reassure especially with her answer when Edwards grilled her about lobbyists' influence on Washington DC.</p>
<p>Clinton wants healthcare etc but her old-style politics will prevent her from getting people together.  </p>
<p>The country does not deserve to have a president who is de facto half president only because a past president/spouse will be pinchhitting for her in tough times.  </p>
<p>Obama has a stronger unifying message for the Country than Edwards.  This is his edge over Edwards.  Both offer a direction that is better for 21st century America politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Henson</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-310155</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Henson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-310155</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t believe a word Obama says.  He has backpeddled and denied and claimed what he said isn&#039;t what he meant, and he has denied his voting history.
Every time he gets BUSTED he can&#039;t seem to take responsibility, and that just reminds me WAY too much of GEORGE W. BUSH JR.!  I don&#039;t trust this guy as far as hillary clinton can throw him. Vote John Edwards in November! Forget how the biased media has practically blacked him out!  Remember that news corporations are still corporations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't believe a word Obama says.  He has backpeddled and denied and claimed what he said isn't what he meant, and he has denied his voting history.<br />
Every time he gets BUSTED he can't seem to take responsibility, and that just reminds me WAY too much of GEORGE W. BUSH JR.!  I don't trust this guy as far as hillary clinton can throw him. Vote John Edwards in November! Forget how the biased media has practically blacked him out!  Remember that news corporations are still corporations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AVAN</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-310143</link>
		<dc:creator>AVAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-310143</guid>
		<description>im so tired of partisan bickering and fingerpointing...there were more votes last year on whether or not to vote on immigration...barrack obama is the best candidate to promote building bridges and build relationships, and even if it is an idealistic message it is better than hillarys partisan war-like message

congress is almost half and half.  A president who wishes to start a fight will lead to inactivity is the worse thing this country can have.  Itll be bush but instead of tax cuts itll be tax increases...she could not bring the troops home she far to divisive</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im so tired of partisan bickering and fingerpointing...there were more votes last year on whether or not to vote on immigration...barrack obama is the best candidate to promote building bridges and build relationships, and even if it is an idealistic message it is better than hillarys partisan war-like message</p>
<p>congress is almost half and half.  A president who wishes to start a fight will lead to inactivity is the worse thing this country can have.  Itll be bush but instead of tax cuts itll be tax increases...she could not bring the troops home she far to divisive</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jep</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-310113</link>
		<dc:creator>jep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-310113</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t agree more with you Kim, we need leaders with substance, not only elouqency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn't agree more with you Kim, we need leaders with substance, not only elouqency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David from Texas</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309913</link>
		<dc:creator>David from Texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309913</guid>
		<description>How can Obama win the General Election when he can&#039;t  win the Southwestern and Western States that have huge Hispanic voters.  It is clear that he lost the Hispanic vote 3 to 1 in Nevada.  I live in the Southwest and the Hispanic vote will be very important in this election if the Democrats hope to win in the  Southwestern States. Obama will never carry the majority of the Southeastern states (heart of the Republican country), because  they are solid Republican and not even close to going Democrat-regardless of who is the nomination. It would take a miracle from above for any Democrat to win the majority of Southeastern States. Obama may speak of being a uniter, but he sure has along way to go, and a few months to change a lot of minds. Moving past Blue states and Red states sound good-but reality it reality.  

The facts are what they are:

We currently we have 1 black U.S. Senator and 1 black Governor.
We currently have 8 women Governors and 16 U.S. women Senators.
We currently have a woman Speaker of the House.

If I am wrong with my facts, someone please correct me. I want to be factual in my data.

It appears to me that the country is more inclined to elect women to higher state and federal positions. This may be an indicator that Hillary may have a better chance than Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can Obama win the General Election when he can't  win the Southwestern and Western States that have huge Hispanic voters.  It is clear that he lost the Hispanic vote 3 to 1 in Nevada.  I live in the Southwest and the Hispanic vote will be very important in this election if the Democrats hope to win in the  Southwestern States. Obama will never carry the majority of the Southeastern states (heart of the Republican country), because  they are solid Republican and not even close to going Democrat-regardless of who is the nomination. It would take a miracle from above for any Democrat to win the majority of Southeastern States. Obama may speak of being a uniter, but he sure has along way to go, and a few months to change a lot of minds. Moving past Blue states and Red states sound good-but reality it reality.  </p>
<p>The facts are what they are:</p>
<p>We currently we have 1 black U.S. Senator and 1 black Governor.<br />
We currently have 8 women Governors and 16 U.S. women Senators.<br />
We currently have a woman Speaker of the House.</p>
<p>If I am wrong with my facts, someone please correct me. I want to be factual in my data.</p>
<p>It appears to me that the country is more inclined to elect women to higher state and federal positions. This may be an indicator that Hillary may have a better chance than Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John, IA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309900</link>
		<dc:creator>John, IA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309900</guid>
		<description>If Republicans are the party of ideas, I might just vote Republican during general election if Obama becomes the nominee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Republicans are the party of ideas, I might just vote Republican during general election if Obama becomes the nominee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chicagoNICK</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309891</link>
		<dc:creator>chicagoNICK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309891</guid>
		<description>the dems in congress cant end the war right now because they dont have the votes to over ride a bush veto. if we had a working majorty like Obama has proposed things could get done. the biggest problems weve had in goverment over the last eight years has been because republicans not listening to outside soures to achive goals. as democrats lets not make the same mistake lets move forward and never look back. One more thing the evidence Obama can bring togther colications is that he appeals to people of all back grounds from black women on the south side of chicago to white men in small towns in New Hampshire. 

hey  Chaunda You dont have to vote Obama, but dont sell your soul instead vote Edwards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the dems in congress cant end the war right now because they dont have the votes to over ride a bush veto. if we had a working majorty like Obama has proposed things could get done. the biggest problems weve had in goverment over the last eight years has been because republicans not listening to outside soures to achive goals. as democrats lets not make the same mistake lets move forward and never look back. One more thing the evidence Obama can bring togther colications is that he appeals to people of all back grounds from black women on the south side of chicago to white men in small towns in New Hampshire. </p>
<p>hey  Chaunda You dont have to vote Obama, but dont sell your soul instead vote Edwards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aisha naeem</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309801</link>
		<dc:creator>aisha naeem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309801</guid>
		<description>HE IS TALKING FAIRYTALE.WHEN I LISTEN TO HIM ITS LIKE WATCHING CIDERELLA STORY MOVIE .ITS ONLY WHEN MOVIE FINISHES U GET HIT WITH ISSUES OF LIFE AND THEN I KNOW WHO TO VOTE FOR 
GO HILLARYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HE IS TALKING FAIRYTALE.WHEN I LISTEN TO HIM ITS LIKE WATCHING CIDERELLA STORY MOVIE .ITS ONLY WHEN MOVIE FINISHES U GET HIT WITH ISSUES OF LIFE AND THEN I KNOW WHO TO VOTE FOR<br />
GO HILLARYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anita</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309776</link>
		<dc:creator>anita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309776</guid>
		<description>Obama has a very powerful message of hope for the future of our country and the world. With Hillary its back to the likes of Madeline Albright who thought it was okay to starve half a million Iraqi children and after that Hillary wanted to kill another half million children along with the best and brightest of America. Does anybody supporting Hillary have a brother who has been maimed for life, unable to even recognize his wife and children in the Iraq war? There are 30,000 so affected in our country, not to mention the countless Iraqis.

How can the democrats vote for a pro-Iraq war candidate? Clearly Hillary has very poor judgment about national security.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama has a very powerful message of hope for the future of our country and the world. With Hillary its back to the likes of Madeline Albright who thought it was okay to starve half a million Iraqi children and after that Hillary wanted to kill another half million children along with the best and brightest of America. Does anybody supporting Hillary have a brother who has been maimed for life, unable to even recognize his wife and children in the Iraq war? There are 30,000 so affected in our country, not to mention the countless Iraqis.</p>
<p>How can the democrats vote for a pro-Iraq war candidate? Clearly Hillary has very poor judgment about national security.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309762</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309762</guid>
		<description>The only real choice in this election seems to be Obama. He has reached out and gained the respect of many young voters and seems to be the direction this country wants to head in. He talks about in his book how after World War II the senators used to discuss the issues that were on the floor over a few glasses of beer. Republicans and Democrats in a relaxed setting, figuring out what is best for this country and its people. 

Nowadays, and over the last eight years we&#039;ve seen republican&#039;s push nothing but their values onto the rest of the country. Bush and Cheney have disgraced the Constitution and refused to accept any good idea that may have come from a democrat. 

The truth is that is what our country had become. Most politicians stick by party lines and refuse to listen to reason. Obama, in all his idealism, has also hit on a philosophy that has lasted over a millennium: &quot;All in moderation&quot;. The truth is that it is never the extremes that get the best results, but those ideas in the middle. 

You will be hard pressed to find those ideas from the average democrat or republican. Barack is at least willing to listen to all sides and all parties. We are not a nation divided... thats a farce designed to gain votes. 

If you want another 4 years of someone that cares more about their money backings and themself than the american people, then vote for Hilary.

You want a real change in this country where people come first, look to Obama. Every major bill that he has wrote has been from working with not just democrats, but republicans. He promises a government where we all push forward towards our similarities and what we all want (which is considerable). 

Yes we have our differences, but those will probably never work themselves out. So lets focus on the likenesses we have. 

Time magazine put Obama in the top 10 people that would change the world. Lets give him that chance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only real choice in this election seems to be Obama. He has reached out and gained the respect of many young voters and seems to be the direction this country wants to head in. He talks about in his book how after World War II the senators used to discuss the issues that were on the floor over a few glasses of beer. Republicans and Democrats in a relaxed setting, figuring out what is best for this country and its people. </p>
<p>Nowadays, and over the last eight years we've seen republican's push nothing but their values onto the rest of the country. Bush and Cheney have disgraced the Constitution and refused to accept any good idea that may have come from a democrat. </p>
<p>The truth is that is what our country had become. Most politicians stick by party lines and refuse to listen to reason. Obama, in all his idealism, has also hit on a philosophy that has lasted over a millennium: "All in moderation". The truth is that it is never the extremes that get the best results, but those ideas in the middle. </p>
<p>You will be hard pressed to find those ideas from the average democrat or republican. Barack is at least willing to listen to all sides and all parties. We are not a nation divided... thats a farce designed to gain votes. </p>
<p>If you want another 4 years of someone that cares more about their money backings and themself than the american people, then vote for Hilary.</p>
<p>You want a real change in this country where people come first, look to Obama. Every major bill that he has wrote has been from working with not just democrats, but republicans. He promises a government where we all push forward towards our similarities and what we all want (which is considerable). </p>
<p>Yes we have our differences, but those will probably never work themselves out. So lets focus on the likenesses we have. </p>
<p>Time magazine put Obama in the top 10 people that would change the world. Lets give him that chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JS</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309751</link>
		<dc:creator>JS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309751</guid>
		<description>As a republican, I&#039;d love to vote for Obama.  But then I realize he has the platform of the most evil organization of our generation, the Democratic party, behind him. 

I wish him luck.  I think if he beats Clinton in the primary he will likely be our next president.  I will not vote for him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a republican, I'd love to vote for Obama.  But then I realize he has the platform of the most evil organization of our generation, the Democratic party, behind him. </p>
<p>I wish him luck.  I think if he beats Clinton in the primary he will likely be our next president.  I will not vote for him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob, Florida-RFO</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309738</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob, Florida-RFO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309738</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Here we go the black thing again!&lt;/i&gt; 

 I am so sick of reading the same comments.  I&#039;d bet that &lt;b&gt;if CNN tracks these comments by origin IP address it will show that 80% of the comments come from the same supporters&lt;/b&gt;.

At least if you &lt;b&gt;use Facebook or some of the other internet blog site&lt;/b&gt; you can reply directly to the commenter.

ABC &#039;08</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Here we go the black thing again!</i> </p>
<p> I am so sick of reading the same comments.  I'd bet that <b>if CNN tracks these comments by origin IP address it will show that 80% of the comments come from the same supporters</b>.</p>
<p>At least if you <b>use Facebook or some of the other internet blog site</b> you can reply directly to the commenter.</p>
<p>ABC '08</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen VA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309670</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen VA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309670</guid>
		<description>Also, for you who has posted negative comments toward Obama&#039;s building bridges abilities as President because quote:
&quot;The fact that republican are afraid to to be too outwardly hostile to him because (300 pound gorilla in the room) he is black and they do not want to be seen as racist?&quot;   It is unfortunate to hear that comment.  

You also stated that HIllary Clinton is doing well not &quot;because of a [political] machine that is because of strength. Strength that Hillary has continued to show. Strength to lead our nation.&quot;
This statement epitimizes the difference between those who support Obama and those who support Clinton.  Yes, Clinton is strong and HER strength could lead the nation.  Contrastingly ,Obama is strong but it is OUR strength with him that will lead this nation!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, for you who has posted negative comments toward Obama's building bridges abilities as President because quote:<br />
"The fact that republican are afraid to to be too outwardly hostile to him because (300 pound gorilla in the room) he is black and they do not want to be seen as racist?"   It is unfortunate to hear that comment.  </p>
<p>You also stated that HIllary Clinton is doing well not "because of a [political] machine that is because of strength. Strength that Hillary has continued to show. Strength to lead our nation."<br />
This statement epitimizes the difference between those who support Obama and those who support Clinton.  Yes, Clinton is strong and HER strength could lead the nation.  Contrastingly ,Obama is strong but it is OUR strength with him that will lead this nation!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Comstock</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309636</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Comstock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309636</guid>
		<description>As we all know, (and it is the main focus of the media) , that this is a historical time in US history, Black male, female candidate, however, I for one can not and will not just sit back and relish it.  Unfortunately this time around, we can not afford to continue to focus on that because, right now we are in the fight of our lives.  It will go down in history either way, but we really truly need to look beyond all of that and get very serious!  How many times will I hear that someone will vote for BO or HC because of their chances of election!!!  that&#039;s so over!  I personally support John Edwards, not because he is white, not because he is a man, not because his dear wife has cancer, not because I want him to be a spoiler or a king maker.  It is because I have been diligent in listening to the candidates intently, exploring the records, consistancies and very importantly, not just what they say but their ideas on how to do things.  Please, what ever you do in this election, don&#039;t pass up this opportunity to make an informed decison, then vote with conviction, not popularity, not what the media guides you to do but what you have a right to do with pride.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As we all know, (and it is the main focus of the media) , that this is a historical time in US history, Black male, female candidate, however, I for one can not and will not just sit back and relish it.  Unfortunately this time around, we can not afford to continue to focus on that because, right now we are in the fight of our lives.  It will go down in history either way, but we really truly need to look beyond all of that and get very serious!  How many times will I hear that someone will vote for BO or HC because of their chances of election!!!  that's so over!  I personally support John Edwards, not because he is white, not because he is a man, not because his dear wife has cancer, not because I want him to be a spoiler or a king maker.  It is because I have been diligent in listening to the candidates intently, exploring the records, consistancies and very importantly, not just what they say but their ideas on how to do things.  Please, what ever you do in this election, don't pass up this opportunity to make an informed decison, then vote with conviction, not popularity, not what the media guides you to do but what you have a right to do with pride.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Brown ( Independent )</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309627</link>
		<dc:creator>James Brown ( Independent )</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309627</guid>
		<description>Obama is the right man for the job , if you want something to actually get done.

If you like the way things are , vote for Clinton , she thinks just exactly like Bush.

Edwards did do better tonight , but the best he can hope for is the VP slot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is the right man for the job , if you want something to actually get done.</p>
<p>If you like the way things are , vote for Clinton , she thinks just exactly like Bush.</p>
<p>Edwards did do better tonight , but the best he can hope for is the VP slot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen VA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309597</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen VA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309597</guid>
		<description>I want to remind everyone who states that Obama can not build bridges between ALL Americans that, I believe, you are not looking at this election in its larger context.  For a moment, pull back and look at the situation.  There are currently three largely supported political candidates running for the Democratic nomination.  We, as Democrats, should not be subjected to divisive political campaigns in a DEMOCRATIC nomination race!  Many people are going to disagree with that.  It is not of our best political interest as Democrats to have a RESPECTED Democratic President mischaracterizing a Democratic nominee.  Yes, Pres. Clinton is Hillary&#039;s husband, but he is also OUR last acting Democratic President.  There is a conflict of interest in this regardless of how you see it.  It is this conflict of interest that has prompted many respectable Democrats to ask Pres. Clinton to tone it down, ultimately to be conscious of the conflict of interest..  Let&#039;s stop the divisiveness by not playing into it; &quot;Unity is the great need to the hour!&quot;
  Obama &#039;08!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to remind everyone who states that Obama can not build bridges between ALL Americans that, I believe, you are not looking at this election in its larger context.  For a moment, pull back and look at the situation.  There are currently three largely supported political candidates running for the Democratic nomination.  We, as Democrats, should not be subjected to divisive political campaigns in a DEMOCRATIC nomination race!  Many people are going to disagree with that.  It is not of our best political interest as Democrats to have a RESPECTED Democratic President mischaracterizing a Democratic nominee.  Yes, Pres. Clinton is Hillary's husband, but he is also OUR last acting Democratic President.  There is a conflict of interest in this regardless of how you see it.  It is this conflict of interest that has prompted many respectable Democrats to ask Pres. Clinton to tone it down, ultimately to be conscious of the conflict of interest..  Let's stop the divisiveness by not playing into it; "Unity is the great need to the hour!"<br />
  Obama '08!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JDR</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309581</link>
		<dc:creator>JDR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309581</guid>
		<description>I will vote for Obama because he is the only one that can win in a general election.  Clinton Is hated by the republicans and disliked by independents like me.  If Clinton wins the nomination she will push every independent away from the party.  However, If Obama wins then not only will he win the majority of the independents he will even get some Republicans to cross over.  

It would be political suicide if the Democrate nominate Clinton.  Clinton is nothing more than a democratic version of Bush and the country will be worse of then it is now.  

Vote Republician if Clinton wins the Democratic nomination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will vote for Obama because he is the only one that can win in a general election.  Clinton Is hated by the republicans and disliked by independents like me.  If Clinton wins the nomination she will push every independent away from the party.  However, If Obama wins then not only will he win the majority of the independents he will even get some Republicans to cross over.  </p>
<p>It would be political suicide if the Democrate nominate Clinton.  Clinton is nothing more than a democratic version of Bush and the country will be worse of then it is now.  </p>
<p>Vote Republician if Clinton wins the Democratic nomination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy in GA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309481</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy in GA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309481</guid>
		<description>I think if HIlary clinton is the nominee she will lose. What is the US Presidency seat a Monarchy, Bush, Clinton, Bush, Clinton,... IF you want a monarchy, move to England. If you want a true President, Vote for Barack Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think if HIlary clinton is the nominee she will lose. What is the US Presidency seat a Monarchy, Bush, Clinton, Bush, Clinton,... IF you want a monarchy, move to England. If you want a true President, Vote for Barack Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309400</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309400</guid>
		<description>Chaunda, allow me to be the first then to say it to you (as I&#039;ve said it for the last year since I - and many of my fellow compatriots - converted into Democrats due to Obama&#039;s message.  I will HAPPILY vote against any Republican or Independent who runs against Barack Obama.  For so many years I&#039;ve been holding my nose as I pulled a ballot and voted for what I considered to simply be the lesser of evils.  Now we have an opportunity to truly elect a statesman.  Someone who isn&#039;t mired in the tunnel visioned mindset that plagues both Democrats and Republicans.  And I assure you I am not alone.

Obama &#039;08!!!

P.S.  And lest it go by you without notice, my kind (non-zealot, sane, rational voting public who looks at each individual candidate and not a party) is the one that decides general elections.  So unless the GOP loses its mind and doesn&#039;t nominate McCain, I find it seriously laughable that Hillary will ever beat him given all of us moderates will flock to McCain (who second only to Barack is really the only other true statesman in this whole insane campaign).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chaunda, allow me to be the first then to say it to you (as I've said it for the last year since I &#8211; and many of my fellow compatriots &#8211; converted into Democrats due to Obama's message.  I will HAPPILY vote against any Republican or Independent who runs against Barack Obama.  For so many years I've been holding my nose as I pulled a ballot and voted for what I considered to simply be the lesser of evils.  Now we have an opportunity to truly elect a statesman.  Someone who isn't mired in the tunnel visioned mindset that plagues both Democrats and Republicans.  And I assure you I am not alone.</p>
<p>Obama '08!!!</p>
<p>P.S.  And lest it go by you without notice, my kind (non-zealot, sane, rational voting public who looks at each individual candidate and not a party) is the one that decides general elections.  So unless the GOP loses its mind and doesn't nominate McCain, I find it seriously laughable that Hillary will ever beat him given all of us moderates will flock to McCain (who second only to Barack is really the only other true statesman in this whole insane campaign).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carla</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309354</link>
		<dc:creator>Carla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309354</guid>
		<description>Until this year I was a registered republican. I have changed it to democrat and have voted for Obama in the Iowa caucus. I will vote for Obama in the General election in November. I know of 5 other Republicans who did the same thing and will vote for Obama NOT MAYBE!!!  I am sure we are not the only six republicans in the nation who have made the switch. I can tell you if it is Hillary Clinton as the democratic nominee I will not be the only &quot;Republican switching back&quot;. If she were to become president she will be the left wing version of George Bush, I know I do not want to see someone who is as narrow minded as George Bush in the White House. She will not be able to solve any of the problems she wants to because it will continue to be the partisan fight we have now. We don&#039;t have universal healthcare now and the reason is she was not willing to work with anyone and it did not pass the first time she tried. Why don&#039;t we give someone else a chance to accomplish what she FAILED at when she tried. Also I am tired of her talking about all of her experience. She was not the president but the presidents wife. She was not the Governor of Arkansas but the Governor&#039;s wife. She was also a corporate lawyer for many years. I don&#039;t want that type of experience in the White House. I want a person who turned down the corporate job to help the poor and needy. I want a person that knows what it is like to be poor. I want a person who knows what I have went through needing to have two jobs to afford college. I want a person who has struggled to pay the bills and know what student loans are first hand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Until this year I was a registered republican. I have changed it to democrat and have voted for Obama in the Iowa caucus. I will vote for Obama in the General election in November. I know of 5 other Republicans who did the same thing and will vote for Obama NOT MAYBE!!!  I am sure we are not the only six republicans in the nation who have made the switch. I can tell you if it is Hillary Clinton as the democratic nominee I will not be the only "Republican switching back". If she were to become president she will be the left wing version of George Bush, I know I do not want to see someone who is as narrow minded as George Bush in the White House. She will not be able to solve any of the problems she wants to because it will continue to be the partisan fight we have now. We don't have universal healthcare now and the reason is she was not willing to work with anyone and it did not pass the first time she tried. Why don't we give someone else a chance to accomplish what she FAILED at when she tried. Also I am tired of her talking about all of her experience. She was not the president but the presidents wife. She was not the Governor of Arkansas but the Governor's wife. She was also a corporate lawyer for many years. I don't want that type of experience in the White House. I want a person who turned down the corporate job to help the poor and needy. I want a person that knows what it is like to be poor. I want a person who knows what I have went through needing to have two jobs to afford college. I want a person who has struggled to pay the bills and know what student loans are first hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Davie</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309337</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Davie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309337</guid>
		<description>Obama has never onced been able to unite democrats and republicans. 

He gives great speeches that he can. Its a FANTASTIC political move. Especially when we see gridlock now. 

However, his inability to defend himself and his record makes it very clear that he has no power to UNITE anything. 

He can UNITE people, but cannot UNITE the politicians necessary to BRING THE ACTUAL CHANGE.  

Obama fails to mention he has NO POWER to get Republicans to do anything they dont want to. What he has shown, he whines and complains WHEN THINGS DONT GO HIS WAY. 

Hillary and Bill have been very effective in showing that Obama is more than happy to get into BICKERING rather than rally HIS PEERS into unity. 


This was the Clinton playbook all along. Get Obama polarized. Get him  to show he cannot UNITE his peers. Show his inexperience.

Obama is a POLITICIAN. 

Obama came up with a political STRATEGY to run for president. 

Obama has little national experience, so he runs on CHANGE and HOPE to sell a bipartisanship . Its the smart move. 

The Clintons and the Republicans are NOT going to let him just get away with this highly effective strategy. Everyone knows it WORKS WELL if left unchallenged. 

Anyone who thinks all these politicians arent playing major games is naive and just giving their vote away. Its all a chess match.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama has never onced been able to unite democrats and republicans. </p>
<p>He gives great speeches that he can. Its a FANTASTIC political move. Especially when we see gridlock now. </p>
<p>However, his inability to defend himself and his record makes it very clear that he has no power to UNITE anything. </p>
<p>He can UNITE people, but cannot UNITE the politicians necessary to BRING THE ACTUAL CHANGE.  </p>
<p>Obama fails to mention he has NO POWER to get Republicans to do anything they dont want to. What he has shown, he whines and complains WHEN THINGS DONT GO HIS WAY. </p>
<p>Hillary and Bill have been very effective in showing that Obama is more than happy to get into BICKERING rather than rally HIS PEERS into unity. </p>
<p>This was the Clinton playbook all along. Get Obama polarized. Get him  to show he cannot UNITE his peers. Show his inexperience.</p>
<p>Obama is a POLITICIAN. </p>
<p>Obama came up with a political STRATEGY to run for president. </p>
<p>Obama has little national experience, so he runs on CHANGE and HOPE to sell a bipartisanship . Its the smart move. </p>
<p>The Clintons and the Republicans are NOT going to let him just get away with this highly effective strategy. Everyone knows it WORKS WELL if left unchallenged. </p>
<p>Anyone who thinks all these politicians arent playing major games is naive and just giving their vote away. Its all a chess match.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan, Chicago, Illinois</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309252</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan, Chicago, Illinois</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309252</guid>
		<description>OBAMA COMPLAINED ABOUT THE ATTACKS ON HIM THESE LAST TWO WEEKS, THIS IS NOTHING COMPARED TO WHAT THE REPUBLICANS WILL DO.
THEY WILL BE OUT FOR BLOOD, NO HOLDS BARRED, THEY GO FOR THE JUGULAR, FOR THE KNOCK OUT BLOW AND THEY WONT PLAY BY ANY RULES.

OBAMA TALKS ABOUT HIS WINNING THE SENATE SEAT IN ILLINOIS AND UNIFYING THE STATE, LOOK WHO HE  RUN AGAINST, &#039;ALAN KEYES&#039; IMPORTED FROM OUT OF STATE, A SACRIFICIAL LAMB, SO FAR TO THE RIGHT HE WAS AROUND THE CORNER. NO ONE ELSE WANTED THE JOB.

OBAMA TALKS ABOUT HIS TIME IN THE ILLINOIS LEGISLATURE AND WHAT HE ACCOMPLISHED, FUNNY THE POWERS THAT BE IN THE LEGISLATURE ARE THE MAJORITY LEADER IN THE SENATE AND THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE. OTHER THAN THOSE TWO NO ONE ELSE HAS A SAY IN WHAT LEGISLATION GETS VOTED ON PERIOD. THESE VOTES ARE WELL ORCHESTRATED, SO SENATORS AND REPRESENTATIVE CAN VOTE IN WAYS THAT WILL NOT HURT THEM WITH THEIR CONSTITUENTS  WHEN THEY RUN FOR RE-ELECTION.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OBAMA COMPLAINED ABOUT THE ATTACKS ON HIM THESE LAST TWO WEEKS, THIS IS NOTHING COMPARED TO WHAT THE REPUBLICANS WILL DO.<br />
THEY WILL BE OUT FOR BLOOD, NO HOLDS BARRED, THEY GO FOR THE JUGULAR, FOR THE KNOCK OUT BLOW AND THEY WONT PLAY BY ANY RULES.</p>
<p>OBAMA TALKS ABOUT HIS WINNING THE SENATE SEAT IN ILLINOIS AND UNIFYING THE STATE, LOOK WHO HE  RUN AGAINST, 'ALAN KEYES' IMPORTED FROM OUT OF STATE, A SACRIFICIAL LAMB, SO FAR TO THE RIGHT HE WAS AROUND THE CORNER. NO ONE ELSE WANTED THE JOB.</p>
<p>OBAMA TALKS ABOUT HIS TIME IN THE ILLINOIS LEGISLATURE AND WHAT HE ACCOMPLISHED, FUNNY THE POWERS THAT BE IN THE LEGISLATURE ARE THE MAJORITY LEADER IN THE SENATE AND THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE. OTHER THAN THOSE TWO NO ONE ELSE HAS A SAY IN WHAT LEGISLATION GETS VOTED ON PERIOD. THESE VOTES ARE WELL ORCHESTRATED, SO SENATORS AND REPRESENTATIVE CAN VOTE IN WAYS THAT WILL NOT HURT THEM WITH THEIR CONSTITUENTS  WHEN THEY RUN FOR RE-ELECTION.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walters</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309181</link>
		<dc:creator>walters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309181</guid>
		<description>He proofed one more time that to attimes abstained from negativity is not a sign of weakness but character ,candor, integrity if we miss this chance we shall have ourselves to blame, John Edwards is good on message but he has a flawed judgement  as evidenced by at least 10 major policy errors but i believe in his intergrity, he is also truthful if is permissible for a politician.
Obama / Edwards 2008</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He proofed one more time that to attimes abstained from negativity is not a sign of weakness but character ,candor, integrity if we miss this chance we shall have ourselves to blame, John Edwards is good on message but he has a flawed judgement  as evidenced by at least 10 major policy errors but i believe in his intergrity, he is also truthful if is permissible for a politician.<br />
Obama / Edwards 2008</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mati</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309156</link>
		<dc:creator>Mati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309156</guid>
		<description>Lets put it simple. 

NoObama. Why? He never answers the more important question: HOW? And when he unites the nation what is happening? Moving the United States toward a single party state? Last time I checked this was called communism. 

Maybe Edwards.  Why? He has a number of good and clear ideas. maybe he cannot cover everything but he is capable to stand for the class issue

Hillary&#039;08! Why? She has the best coverage of issues, the vision on HOW to address them, AND she is the most pragmatic so this is how she can get to Republicans, not with words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets put it simple. </p>
<p>NoObama. Why? He never answers the more important question: HOW? And when he unites the nation what is happening? Moving the United States toward a single party state? Last time I checked this was called communism. </p>
<p>Maybe Edwards.  Why? He has a number of good and clear ideas. maybe he cannot cover everything but he is capable to stand for the class issue</p>
<p>Hillary'08! Why? She has the best coverage of issues, the vision on HOW to address them, AND she is the most pragmatic so this is how she can get to Republicans, not with words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: curiosityhasme</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309138</link>
		<dc:creator>curiosityhasme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309138</guid>
		<description>Bill, Bill, Bill.  Barack Obama is none of those things.  Before you can be a unifier, you have to know what you&#039;re unifying.  The guy is all over the map.  He can&#039;t give a straight answer.  He contradicts himself, resents any question, plays the race card at every turn, and does not have a grasp on the issues.  Why in the world are you guys trying to create a candidate that just does not exist?  You&#039;ll soon be at the same level as Chris Matthews and the rest of MSNBC.  Never thought I&#039;d see the day when FOX News is really fair and balanced.  Obama only gets half a free pass with them.  By the way...when can we expect you to follow up on the Rezko matter, Obama&#039;s 130 &quot;present&quot; votes, and his affiliation with Trinity United Church of Christ and their racist agenda, and pastor (Obama&#039;s mentor) who awarded Louis Farrakhan as the epitome of greatness?  Just to let you know we&#039;re waiting.  After all, you&#039;re supposed to be &quot;The Best Political Team on Television&quot;.  Right?  Then you should be discussing all issues, including those about Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, Bill, Bill.  Barack Obama is none of those things.  Before you can be a unifier, you have to know what you're unifying.  The guy is all over the map.  He can't give a straight answer.  He contradicts himself, resents any question, plays the race card at every turn, and does not have a grasp on the issues.  Why in the world are you guys trying to create a candidate that just does not exist?  You'll soon be at the same level as Chris Matthews and the rest of MSNBC.  Never thought I'd see the day when FOX News is really fair and balanced.  Obama only gets half a free pass with them.  By the way...when can we expect you to follow up on the Rezko matter, Obama's 130 "present" votes, and his affiliation with Trinity United Church of Christ and their racist agenda, and pastor (Obama's mentor) who awarded Louis Farrakhan as the epitome of greatness?  Just to let you know we're waiting.  After all, you're supposed to be "The Best Political Team on Television".  Right?  Then you should be discussing all issues, including those about Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chaunda</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309105</link>
		<dc:creator>Chaunda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309105</guid>
		<description>What evidence is there that Obama can &quot;create coalitions&quot;. The fact that republican are afraid to to be too outwardly hostile to him because (300 pound gorilla in the room) he is black and they do not want to be seen as racist? They won&#039;t be scared to tear him a new one when he is the nominee and he gives them all kinds of fodder everytime he opens his mouth. The fact is they have been trying to take Hillary out for 15 years and cannot. That&#039;s not because of a machine that is because of strength. Strength that Hillary has continued to show. Strength to lead our nation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What evidence is there that Obama can "create coalitions". The fact that republican are afraid to to be too outwardly hostile to him because (300 pound gorilla in the room) he is black and they do not want to be seen as racist? They won't be scared to tear him a new one when he is the nominee and he gives them all kinds of fodder everytime he opens his mouth. The fact is they have been trying to take Hillary out for 15 years and cannot. That's not because of a machine that is because of strength. Strength that Hillary has continued to show. Strength to lead our nation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anti obama</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309101</link>
		<dc:creator>anti obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309101</guid>
		<description>never obama...muhamed...back to Middle East...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>never obama...muhamed...back to Middle East...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mohamed</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309027</link>
		<dc:creator>Mohamed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-309027</guid>
		<description>I think Obama can deliver what he is preaching about. The man is serious to unite this nation. This period of time,  we need a president who is honest and  trustworthy. We need a  president who is a uniter not a divider and a president who can solve our own problems here at home and abroad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Obama can deliver what he is preaching about. The man is serious to unite this nation. This period of time,  we need a president who is honest and  trustworthy. We need a  president who is a uniter not a divider and a president who can solve our own problems here at home and abroad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-308906</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-308906</guid>
		<description>Chaunda,

 You say, &quot;I cannot hang my vote on a &quot;hope&quot;. Mind you that there are millions of people watching intensely the outcome of US Presidential primaries and yearn for a leader that will heal the world and bring America back where it belongs - that is center of the world. These millions would love to vote for the &quot;hope&quot;, which Obama represent. Good luck with your support to Hillary and her surrogate husband.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chaunda,</p>
<p> You say, "I cannot hang my vote on a "hope". Mind you that there are millions of people watching intensely the outcome of US Presidential primaries and yearn for a leader that will heal the world and bring America back where it belongs &#8211; that is center of the world. These millions would love to vote for the "hope", which Obama represent. Good luck with your support to Hillary and her surrogate husband.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy, Oklahoma   Feb. 5th</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-308894</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy, Oklahoma   Feb. 5th</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-308894</guid>
		<description>Again Obama can not answer the question&#039;s, and CNN does not help him in this manner, but any how I think Edwards came off real well, he stood for his beliefs. I fully understand Senator Clinton on her stance. She has been clear on issue&#039;s. Senator Obama on the other hand, was frazzled, Tongue tied on occasion, and avoided the question&#039;s at hand. He interrupted the other candidates more when they would say something he did not like. I seen real weakness in Senator Obama, tonight more then any other. Senator Clinton was firm on her issues, I will be very proud to give her my vote on February 5th and again in November.

Senator Clinton for President 2008. &quot;She&#039;s, THE REAL THING&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again Obama can not answer the question's, and CNN does not help him in this manner, but any how I think Edwards came off real well, he stood for his beliefs. I fully understand Senator Clinton on her stance. She has been clear on issue's. Senator Obama on the other hand, was frazzled, Tongue tied on occasion, and avoided the question's at hand. He interrupted the other candidates more when they would say something he did not like. I seen real weakness in Senator Obama, tonight more then any other. Senator Clinton was firm on her issues, I will be very proud to give her my vote on February 5th and again in November.</p>
<p>Senator Clinton for President 2008. "She's, THE REAL THING"</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marianne</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-308630</link>
		<dc:creator>Marianne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/21/schneider-obamas-post-partisan-message/#comment-308630</guid>
		<description>This country has been brought so far over to right and the current adminstraion has given the corporations so much power that I don&#039;t see how can someone proposing a &quot;middle of the road&quot; approach can restore balance of power to our government and restore democracy to our country by just negotiating with not much left to offer.  That just doesn&#039;t make any sense to me. (FYI Barack Obama has taken corporate money too so I don&#039;t see how he can get around those &quot;favors&quot; he wil have to repay).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This country has been brought so far over to right and the current adminstraion has given the corporations so much power that I don't see how can someone proposing a "middle of the road" approach can restore balance of power to our government and restore democracy to our country by just negotiating with not much left to offer.  That just doesn't make any sense to me. (FYI Barack Obama has taken corporate money too so I don't see how he can get around those "favors" he wil have to repay).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
