Tired of the media choosing Clinton and Obama and ignoring Edwards. The Republicans will win the White House due to the Media calling the election for the rest of us. Check out the map and who can win: The only candidate to win a a Red State was Senator John Edwards. Senator Clinton and Senator Obama won in Blue States. If Senator Edwards can carry North & South Carolina, the Democrats can win the White House. The other two candidates may not be able to carry sufficient Red States for the Democrats to regain the White House. Senator Edwards is the ONLY candidate who can carry a majority of the South, to win the White House. Clinton and Obama have already divided the Democratic Party with their fighting. The only candidate that can unite the party and win Red States is Edwards which is only way to WIN the White House.

Thanks

"Clinton is running as the anti-Bush, while Obama is running as the un-Bush. Which will primary voters prefer?" - Schneider

Independents will show you which one will win.

Obama was nasty tonight and I did not like!

Am I the only one struck by how eager Bill Schneider is to breathe some life back into Edwards' candidacy? Nobody's going for it, Bill. Edwards has had four years to sell what he's got, and no one's buying. Even if he doubled his support in S.C. right now, he'd still be on the outside looking in at Clinton and Obama. The only impact he has on this race from now on is whether to let Hillary waltz by staying in and sucking up some of the anti-Clinton vote or dropping out and letting the "change" sentiment coalesce behind Obama.

We prefer a winner and the winner is Hillary Clinton.

Clinton wins. I keep looking at other candidates, but every time I watch her debate, I get sucked back in.

She was adament about healthcare. Clinton and Edwards creamed Obama on healthcare.

Speculation that Chelsea Clinton is engaged to boyfriend Marc Mezvinsky has been the buzz for some time but if they do make it to the altar before November 2008, Mezvinsky's pop won't make it. Unless of course they are married in a Federal prison.

ABC notes that Ed Mezvinsky, a former Iowa Congressman, is serving a seven-year sentence for fraud after getting caught up in a series of Nigerian e-mail scams.

This should play out well on Hillary's 2008 campaign.

I want the complete and utter opposite of Bush and that would be Hillary Clinton. Obama is like a light beer when you NEED an ale. I definitely pour a strong one in celebration of Bush leaving office. And I have not had hard liquor in years.

You are correct, Bill, Edwards did a great job tonight. He proved he belongs up there with the "fighters"–And I do not mean that in a positive way.

Clinton has always felt more than a little false to me. Her answers are all too carefully considered and vetted. It's clear that she has the most experience answering difficult questions in a non-committal manner but I don't feel that she has given me anything to be excited about as a candidate. McCain may have completely different stances on the "issues" but he seems more Democratic than she does. I don't want someone who knows how to answer questions in a way that angers the least number of people. I want someone who answers honestly and in a forthright manner. I wish someone would ask Senator Clinton if she believes that the many writers of the Constitution, many far younger and with less considered political experience than she, were too young or too inexperienced to have forged the framework of the country.

Edwards, for all that he seems an honest fellow, is rather lackluster and lacks the force of personality I would expect from a leader. He will always be just a VP in my eyes no matter how favorable I may find his positions. Beyond that, he's just a politician.

Obama, whatever weaknesses he may have shown this evening during the first half of the debate is still my candidate of choice as I feel he has both, the strongest most genuine convictions and is also entirely candid in what he says. He may not speak as fluidly as his opponents but my feeling is that he is attempting to give an honest answer rather than pander to the politically safe middle ground. He has the character, integrity and honestly that I would want in my President and he has shown the most intelligence and class in his campaign.

Something to remember is that a President's power comes from the people. All of the people. Voting in someone who is clearly partisan may satisfy the political agenda but it staunches the chance of any change when you replace one demagogue with another, no matter their views. I will be voting for a candidate that I feel appeals to Americans as a people, not just as a partisan. That is something that neither Senator Clinton or Edwards can claim. They offer a clenched fist and the continuing politics of veteran Washington politicos. I will be voting for change. Even the mere hope of change is a better choice than the desolation of the current status quo. President Obama offers truth and ideals that embody the spirit and passion that this nation was founded upon. I will vote for hope.

Personally, I think there are several things to consider. I don't want someone that will continue to divide our country (Republicans vs Democrats vs Independents) which means Hillary Clinton.
I want someone, like Barack Obama, who will unite this country. That is what is needed here. I think in the end : unity will be the key, and Obama will appeal to people.

And a last note, I am asking those who are giving comments here, give me one good reason to vote for Hillary Clinton :
- She talks about going against Republicans.
- Her health care plan has failed during her husband's campaign, why would it be any different now?
- And why would I want to vote for Hillary, if in the end I feel like I am voting for Bill.
Give me one good reason why!

Voters want unbush.

For the sake of our country, I'll take a consensus builder every time.

Oh for heavens sake, anti Bush! he isn't even running he can't! What is it with the the idiots in clinton inc.? Anyone can make smart alec remarks about someone when that person isn't even involved with the process. Big thighed people like Hitlery belong in the pasture so she can chew her cudd!

Hitlery, your about to get your fat butt kicked in the south you witch!

Go Obama!

The bard

I thought Edwards was looking good out there tonight. I would not count him out yet.

The unbush.

Bill Clinton And Nancy Piglosi's Son On Payroll Of Scam Artist

Didn't Nancy Piglosi promise to stop the growing trend of legislators and their families accepting gifts, trips, and jobs from lobbyists and corporations? Well ……

It hasn't happened, as evidenced by Nancy Piglosi, our former President Bill "It depends on what the meaning of is … is" Clinton, and others. As Dick Morris describes the employer of Bill Clinton and Paul Piglosi, InfoUSA is the same company that has been cited by the New York Times for creating marketing lists that were used by con artists to fleece vulnerable elderly people.

The chairman of InfoUSA, Vin Gupta, is a large donor to Democratic candidates. Minority shareholders have questioned his payments to Bill Clinton and his gifts of free travel to Hillary.
The lists had provocative names and offered the names of elderly people with cancer, elderly people with Alzheimer's and gamblers over 55 years of age who think their luck will change.

Edwards = broken record. The same old lines for 8 years.

There is nothing wrong with partisanship…except when partisanship is exercised just for its own sake. I think we need to ficus more on leaders who come to the tabel with the intention of solving problems rather than scoring points.

Thank goodness that Senator Obama was able to bring to light some of the distortions that the Clintons have been putting out in the press the past week or so.

Obama/Edwards '08

obama is very defensive and who does he think he is? he can talk about people and question them, but no body can talk about his past? the republicans are going to eat him up and why would he vote over 130 times present without taking a firm stand? that means he can't make a concrete decision. he was on the offense tonight and from his body language you could tell he doesn't take kindly to people opposing him.

Were you watching the same debate, The Bard? Bill is not the only one agreeing that Edwards is in it again after tonight.'s great performance…

Like I have said, the Clintons have not said anything about Edwards because he is not a threat. If Edwards were the front runner, his face would have been as red as a beet!

The voters need to think Red and Blue States. The only candidate who can win in both is Edwards. So, that is not breathing life—that is FACT.

I'm a Republican but will vote for whoever can get us back working together again. I can absolutely guarantee you that I will NOT vote for Hillary, but would potentially vote for Obama.

RECORDS SET

- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court

* According to our best information, 40 government officials were indicted or convicted in the wake of Watergate. A reader computes that there was a total of 31 Reagan era convictions, including 14 because of Iran-Contra and 16 in the Department of Housing & Urban Development scandal. 47 individuals and businesses associated with the Clinton machine were convicted of or pleaded guilty to crimes with 33 of these occurring during the Clinton administration itself. There were in addition 61 indictments or misdemeanor charges. 14 persons were imprisoned. A key difference between the Clinton story and earlier ones was the number of criminals with whom he was associated before entering the White House.

Using a far looser standard that included resignations, David R. Simon and D. Stanley Eitzen in Elite Deviance, say that 138 appointees of the Reagan administration either resigned under an ethical cloud or were criminally indicted. Curiously Haynes Johnson uses the same figure but with a different standard in "Sleep-Walking Through History: America in the Reagan Years: "By the end of his term, 138 administration officials had been convicted, had been indicted, or had been the subject of official investigations for official misconduct and/or criminal violations. In terms of number of officials involved, the record of his administration was the worst ever."

I for one hope the primary voters will listen to the candidates and not so much the commentors, and vote for the candidate who represents their wishes for country's rebirth after the mismanagement of George and Dick and their yesmen.

But if they must listen to someone else to figure out who they like best, I hope they take in the first paragraph of this last ticker, and realize it says it all.

John is defined by his own works, not as a anti or un Anybody. His strength is the firmness of his stance, making the hard choices and standing by them.

I could write about the negatives of the other candidates, but I like John would rather focus on moving forward, and bringing America back up to her she belongs.

An America we all could be proud of…

I agree Edwards did well in the debate.

But Hillary hit the home run again.

Obama is tall and beaming with smile. But on substance he is skinny and very defensive.

His explanation on his remarks of Republican Party and Ron Reagan is absurd and he looked like a thief caught in the act of some unspeakable crime!

He may win the Blacks of SC, but nationally he cannot stand. He has too many question marks of inexperience at the national level, he being brought up as a Muslim in Indonesia and his dealings with some questionable real estate dealer in Chicago, etc.

I want Hillary and Edwards to come together to beat the Republican Attack Machine.

anti-Bush is not what America needs now. Fighting will not make the problems go away. The country is already divided as it it. And by the way, the fighting is all about the greed and dynastic ambitions of the Bush's and the Clintons.

un-Bush is what America needs. A strategically different approach provided by Barack Obama.

Every disease has a anti-serum or a cure for the illness and this country is badly infected and it needs a anti-serum to be rid of its disease. Thats where Clinton comes in at exactly where and when we need her as the anti-serum for this country.

I enjoyed the debate i thought obama did well i think it showed me how hillary is the old way which is the wrong way .and obama is the new way to think in washington but i was disappointed that there was no debate about illegal immigration …

Now be fair Bard, Edwards did, in my opinion, have a very good showing tonight. He does seem to be fighting a losing battle though for sure. It seems he has, for once, the disadvantage of being a white male.

The Clintons needed to be called on what they have been doing and what kind of divisive direction they would steer the country into. There is no other way to do it but directly. Obama has tried to run a campaign based on openness and truth, but they keep injecting the old-style politics. He was right to respond tonight.

Your right Bill, John got my attention. Too bad he is still low in the polls. He has the characteristics I'd like to see in my president, then I have to remember, this is a country that elected George W

Only Hillary can beat the Republicans and get us back in the White House.

Barack Obama had to come bring the game to the Clintons tonight. And he won!

Aidyn,
When Obama is throwing rocks BACK he's considered nasty! GIVE ME A BREAK!!! It was an even fight Hillary was just as aggressive in this debate. did you even listen to what was said?

Although early in the debate Sen Obama seemed a bit uncomfortable with regards to the double-team attacks, he remained the consummate diplomat and offered thoughtful, scholarly, genuine rebuttals, always looking presidential.

I hate to think of 24 years of Bush/Clinton. The country doesn't need an aristocracy. An Obama/Edward ticket or vice versa would be an ideal choice.

We NEED a President that approaches things like Obama is trying to do. That is why every state should open all primaries and caucuses and thus cripple the main outlet of partisanship that harms our country.

We need a Nominee who doesn't want to simply beat the Republicans, but rather to build that working majority that can get things done. Obama can do this; Edwards can probably do it too. Hillary doesn't give any indication that she would.

I remember what it was like before Bush when the Republicans and the Democrats were constantly bickering. We, THE PEOPLE, spent millions of dollars on investigations, et. al. Not to mention a nasty impeachment trial.

I wonder, just wonder, if it is possible after the election to get a government that represents THE PEOPLE as we are described in the Constitution rather than this constant party bickering that distracts us from the real issues.

Sometimes you get the impression that THE PEOPLE serve only to annoint a party's preferred candidate and that, once elected, we'll go back to business as usual.

One sometimes wishes there was a choice on the ballot that says "None of the above. Start over." Unfortunately, that would mean more years of GW Bush and that's a private hell we don't deserve.

I thought Clinton and Edwards did very well tonight. Obama continues to evade answering the tough questions.

Interesting, Bill Schneider brings Edwards back in and then kicks him out in the end, making it a 2 way race. Which is exactly how i've been thinking about it until tonite, Now how do I change my mail in ballot?

I am glad to see that Obama could effectively point out the nasty and divisive politics being practiced by his opposition. We need post-partisanship, honesty, and integrity to move forward domestically and to set an example for the rest of the world.

Obama-Edwards 08!

If anyone was really paying attention, John Edwards was the only one on that stage that looked presidential tonight. His ideas and dare I say it, his words, have set the agenda for all the candidates in this campaign. He has been overshadowed by the "historic" candidacies of Hillary and Barack and the unfair way much of the media has concentrated solely on those two. I for one, hope and pray that Bill Schneider is correct and people start giving John Edwards the attention and votes he deserves.

We all know who you prefer Bill…Need I say Obama?

If Edwards is truly about change, he needs to drop out as soon as possible and and start rallying behind Obama. Hillary is way out of hand. How convenient to say that "I didn't say that, my husband did, talk to him about it". She is as dirty as traditional politicians. I really like Obama and Edwards and how sincere they are. Hope they can team up together soon and get Hillary out of the race. The country will be in turmoil if Hillary was to be nominated.

According to Obama Bill Clinton has been campaiging for Hillary , & he did not think it was right , But when Oprah Winfrey campaigned for him that was alright, what is ok for him is not ok for Hillary. Give me a break!

Clinton as the anti - Bush and Obama the un-Bush. Anything with Bush's name in it makes them both sound bad. But, I agree that change needs to happen from what is currrently happening with the Bush Administration and both of the these candidates are pushing for this. There strategies are different in the way they want to go about doing it, as Obama stated to tonight. But that is not the point, the point is whom can make a change from the current economic situation our country is now in. I prefer the candidate whom will stick to there word and show some consistency toward the bettering the economy and our troops in Iraq. I'm tired of politicians saying one thing and doing another, I believe that Barack will and has stuck to his word.

Finish the last paragraph, Bill: you say what Hillary and Obama are running as, how about INCLUDING EDWARDS?? Why does the media always portray it's just Obama and Clinton running?

Edwards is running to restore the middle class after Bush.
There, I said it for you.

There was a moment that I felt like Obama would burst into tears. Poor baby.

"Obama/Edwards '08″

After tonight I am changing parties. There is not one democrat on that stage I would vote for. They acted as if there are no poor Whites in America and how hard things are for the American Blacks.That is an outrage and our country knows this.If ever the race line was widened it was done tonight by those three.If this doesn't soon end there will be a civil war in this country.It is brewing now.I only learned of this last week.Secret meetings of the K.K.K. Those horrible Skinheads forming new srategies.It's happening in my own county and a lot of law enforcement are involved.It's hush hush right now,but getting louder.These idiots have to stop pushing black against black.

I'm for Edwards simply because I don't believe anything can be "changed" in DC until the special interest money and lobbyists are done away with first. That is the major issue because it determines how everything else will be done. Companies are recording record profits and CEOs are making rediculous bonuses while I have to work a 60 hour week just to afford a middle class lifestyle and i'm actually losing ground financially.
By the way has anyone noticed that oil is down to $87 a barrel ??? That's down $13 in the past month. Has anyone's gas prices dropped yet ???? Didn't think so

Bard, I think he pushing for Obama!

I think John Edwards was the only candidate with class here tonight! All the bickering between Obama and Hilary just turns me right off! Im a registered Republican, but I vote my conscious, not just party lines….John Edwards certainly is a strong contender for my vote!

did you see hillary's face at times when barack had those stinging words?

priceless.

We need an anti-Bush to win in the general. Any of these three would be a vast improvement and insure that our civil liberties will be restored and protected and the Court will remain balanced. Hillary's more centrist foreign relations positions and moderate hawkishness will serve her well in the general. This primary race will make her stronger. McCain has moved far too close to Bush to win in the nomination and that will sink him in the general - IF he can get the nomination, which is far from certain. Hannity and Rush and the establishment do NOT like him.

I agree Leah….Obama looked strong. He showed he can stand up
to tough talk and traditional political strategies.

John Edwards needs to win a state before he's "back in it".

Obama saying "I don't know who I'm running against" made the debate.

Hillary's partisanship will get her the nom, and lose us the White House. Think ahead guys.

All of these guys rock, man this is exciting to see, we are going to kick some serious republican ass in November!

Clinton totally won tonite!

Barack came off as inexperienced and rude.

Edwards was good, but he's still not up to par.

I'm liking Hillary Clinton for the win!

Obama wa horrible. His views keep on changing and he spends more time in refuting what HIllary says rather than his own thoughts. He seems clueless about unexplored area of healthcare, economy isuues. It was strange, Obama has not even voted for issues in his own legislature. voting "present" 130 times was simply horrible.

Clinton committed Political Harikari,

Every answer she gave was an attack on another candidate. She was very well versed on what she obviously thought were bad moves on her opponents records. She was booed more than once and she rarely speak to any of her accomplishments.

All Edwards did was sort of be the peace maker between two heated contenders, his performance looks strong on paper but on tv or in person he looked weak and clearly out of this race, the reason he was out of the heated exchanges between Hillary and Barrack is because they have both clearly shut him out of this race and he's desperatly trying to get some attention.
But between Obama and Clinton, Hillary shined her debate skills and looked good, Obama on the other hand looked way too defensive and that is where his weakness lies.

As Obama said keep attacking that means he is ahead.To all of the Hillary supporters. What are you scared of if Obama can't win. You should attack Edwards.If Obama can't win why do you guys keep attacking him. Guess you are scared. HA HA HA!!!!!!!!

Edwards and Obama clearly outshined Clinton tonight who came across brutish earlier on and disingenuous throughout.

OBAMA WAS THE ONLY CANDIDATE STUTTERING AT TIMES LOOKING FOR WORDS…NOT IMPRESSIVE AT ALL IN COMPARISON TO HILLARY AND JOHN..
1 HILLARY[
2 JOHN
3 OBAMA….STILL LEARNING DIPLOMACY….NOT GOOD WITH CONFLICT

Clinton is also running her campaign based on ideas and experience, while Obama is running his on hope. I think most Americans would prefer that their next President be the more competent candidate rather than the most inspirational candidate.

I have always been a supporter of the Clintons but their conduct during this campaign has been deplorable.

I appreciated Obama's commenting on the distortions as well. But, after tonight's debate, I'm thinking "Edwards/Obama '08."

Clinton is a heavy weight contender facing a fly weight. It's only a matter of time before she delivers a knock-out punch.

Edwards got himself in? His selling point: I'm white. I'm a guy. I can go anywhere!

I can't wait for CNN to do a special report on all the blantant lies that fell from Clinton's lips tonight. Or at least notice that her statements tonight contradict what's on her site and everything she's said before tonight.

Obama was not nasty…Billary has been playing the dirty games that we all know them to be very good at…he has a right to respond!

On another network, they carefully analyized and presented the facts on this supposed distortion of Obama 's record. Of four that were challenged by Obama, the Clintons were right on in regards to two, one was a jump ball (not clear) and Obama was right on one of them. So Obama was wrong on 2 of 3 or 67% of these.

He's a cry baby but most at faul t s his campaign manager and staff who can't take the facts and wan tto distort his record.

Bill Schnieder is right about Obama's stategy Vs Clinton's where she's clearly playing for the sure vote of the democratic base who's used to a divided politics of red against blue. Now it is my beleif that both red and blue states are tired of being labed as such and are ready for some color blind states … Uited Sates that is !!!! And that's why, to my humble opinion, Obama, not just will, but should win not just the nomination but the presidency … yes I said it !

Holy smokes!!! Can we please stop the obviously pro-Obama media analysis. Any junior poly-sci major/NYC PR firm could tell you that Clinton triumphed at today's debate.

Looking forward to a repeat of N.H…. we all know how accurate the pundits were with that outcome (thank you Arriana H. for pointing this out)

I was interested in the 100+ present votes of Obama while in Illinois. Sounds like he is afraid to commit . Would have been more impressed if he would have voted yea or nay.. At least he would have taken a stand, whether right or wrong!!!

Edwards really gave dems something to think about when the real vote comes in November.

I agree with The Bard. Edwards is out even if he does ok in SC. Can someone please call Hillary on the 35 years of experience?!! She got out of law school 35 years ago. You'd think she was in political office for 35 years since then. While I'm sure being First Lady has its moments, it's not running the country! Perhaps Laura Bush should run for President too!

Senator Obama's supporters applauded every time he spoke no matter what he said. I'm glad the camera was on those applauding….they were diehard Obama supporters and as one of the analysts said later, "It won't matter what Obama says or does, the black voters will support him." Wow. And, I know it would make for more exciting press coverage but John Edwards is unfortunately not back in the race..more wishful and hopeful thinking.

John Edwards won this debate. He showed that his only focus is to do what is best for the country, especially those who have been disenfranchised. Clinton and Obama fought each other and John Edwards rose above it all. I only wish CNN and every other media outlet would show some of his responses in their news programs. Instead they will sell the sensational "fight" scenes between Clinton and Obama and once again Edwards will not get any attention at all. Like Mr. Edwards said "There are three people in this debate." If the media outlets gave him the "free" air time that the two "celebrity candidates" receive he would be giving them both a run for their money in the primaries.

Bill Schneider,

I like your analysis! You are doing a wonderful job! Hillary's strategy is popular and emotional. It is along the party line. Obama' strategy is logically sound. It is inclusive.

Hillary's strategy is rewarding in the short term but ends to politics as usual.
Obama' strategy may not help him gain the nomination, but America will need it to solve real problems.

I agree. This is not a time for a partisan president, it is time for a president that will bring this country together to tackle the real issues of our times. If we are too busy fighting our partisan battles, we will not be able to build the kind of consensus we will require going forward.

Obama/Edwards 08

Clinton is running as the anti-Bush and Barry Soetoro - oh wait a minute he changed his name to a Muslin name - oh wait a minute but he calls himself a Christian…

Barry Soetoro is not unlike Bush - full of BS, totally unqualified, mouth full of marbles, completely on an ego to trip to win (notice the reference to Reagan, and the red tie - he's after undecided voters!!), not to change or grow this country but to chase down politics for one group and that is the black people of America. The sad thing is there are so many more qualified black leaders with education and track records that show real work, real action and words that are followed by actions.

PRESENT - yeah the guy is present in his own mind preying on the young and ignorant voter..it's so pathetic..THIS MAN IS NO JFK OR MLK…he's a liar, and a weak man with a big ego and big mouth.

If he wins the GOP we will be forced to vote for another bloody republican for the safety of this country. Good heavens!! …or we'll all have to move to Canada!

Get the arrogant liar out of US politics PLEASE!! YUK!!!~!

Edwards did in fact, win the debate. Experience, reason and intelligence in the White House - now that would be a welcome change. Money does talk and Hillary and Obama both have a lot of it, but hopefully America is fed up enough with Washington's crooked politics and cronyism to vote for true change in the form of John Edwards. Go, John Edwards, the true progressive candidate!

WHY ARE THEY PICKING ON HILARY WHEN THEY BOTH ACTING LIKE SCHOOL KIDS.AND FOR ME WE ARE ELCETING THE NEXT PRESIDENT
OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA……….SHAME ON BOTH OF YOU.
IF THIS IS HOW YOU ACTING NOW WHATS GOINT TO HAPPEND IF WE ELECTED ONE OF YOU..!!!!!!

The one telling remark to me was one that Obama made. While I may not have the words exactly it was something like Hillary going for the woman vote, me the black vote and then there's John. What the hell is wrong with this country to dismiss a viable, potentially electable candidate just because he's a white male. Give me a break.

I think it is interesting that CNN frames the debate in a manner which is clearly biased toward the Democrats. Example: the Democratic candidates were asked to respond to the idea that the surge in Iraq was working with "a little political progress" of late but did not ask the Democrats what they thought would happen to the people of Iraq AFTER they pulled all the troops out. Do they think the people of that region are going to love us for abandoning the people of Iraq?

How do I know if my message has been posted when I have the "Your comment is awaiting moderation." Oo

So, I'll repost it :

Personally, I think there are several things to consider. I don't want someone that will continue to divide our country (Republicans vs Democrats vs Independents) which means Hillary Clinton.
I want someone, like Barack Obama, who will unite this country. That is what is needed here. I think in the end : unity will be the key, and Obama will appeal to people.

And a last note, I am asking those who are giving comments here, give me one good reason to vote for Hillary Clinton :
- She talks about going against Republicans.
- Her health care plan has failed during her husband's campaign, why would it be any different now?
- And why would I want to vote for Hillary, if in the end I feel like I am voting for Bill.
Give me one good reason why!

Edwards clearly has been ahead of any of the other candidates on the critical issues facing the U.S. and his campaign is based on his true convictions rather than on character assassination. Listen to what the candidates say rather than the rhetoric surrounding them.

HRC versus Obama

1) Experience
Hilary - 7 years
Obama - 11 years

2) Academics credentials
Hilary - ordinary pass (Yale Law); failed Washington bar exam
Obama - Magma cum laude graduate (Harvard Law)

3) Claim to fame
Hilary – married to Bill
Obama – Keynote speaker at 2004 Democratic convention

3) Claim to fame
Hilary – married to Bill
Obama – Keynote speaker at 2004 Democratic convention and author of 2 bestselling books

4) Main strengths
Hilary – Bill
Obama – brilliant, eloquent scholar with extraordinary organizational and leadership skills

5) Main weakness
Hilary – Mediocre leadership skills including flawed approach (disingenuousness, entitled, ruthless and power-hungry)
Obama – African background

The Clintons look desperate and the negative politicing is looking very ugly on them. Don't trust them at all.

That was very interesting, John Edwards is back in? In SC maybe, it is his home turf and I would hope so but it is still a 3rd place finish. Obama is going to unite us, the way Obama and Hillary united tonight? People don't always want to "play nice" so what do you do then? Hillary has always been a scrapy woman with no apologies for what she believes in, I like that in my President!

Go Hillary!

Chris says Edwards is a broken record, but listen to Obama. He wants to "reach out and be a uniter, get beyond partisan politics." You know who was singing that tune in 2000? GEORGE W. BUSH THAT'S WHO! It's empty rhetoric. Now, Clinton, she's the consummate politician. Whenever she talks it's like there's a rear projection of focus groups and analysts. At least John Edwards is talking about the poor, the homeless veterans, the single moms, the people that the Democratic party used to care about.

Hillary plays old school politics, something that she has mastered from Bill.-truth distortion, spinning

Im glad Obama put Hillary in her place! I want him to continue to firmly do so, but I do not want him to forgot what makes him such a viable candidate.

Continue to Fight Hard and Good Job Obama!

I think the S.C. Primary will now be one during this week post-debate.

From the information I've heard, Hillary Clinton will be leaving S.C. to visit other parts of the nation while 'hubby' Bill will take over the campaign in S.C.

Edwards will be putting all his eggs in the S.C. basket after his strong showing this debate, and will certainly put up larger numbers this primary compared to his previous showings.

Eventually, I believe Obama has the edge in this race. He is to remain in S.C. campaigning and will look to put a positive spin on this debate.

If I had to predict:
Obama 37%, Clinton 32%, Edwards 14%

There is no doubt that the excellent experience; talent, motivation and dedication to well serve America were shining from Hillary. She will bring America to high level of prosperity.
She is the only ONE capable to make it again: America is the Land of opportunity.
Go Hillary we are behind you
New Orleans

Hillary plays old school politics, something that she has mastered from Bill.-truth distortion, spinning

Im glad Obama put Hillary in her place! I want him to continue to do so, but I do not want him to forgot what makes him such a viable candidate.

Continue to Fight Hard and Good Job Obama!

I thought that at one point in the debate that the audience actually booed Hillary. I thought that was very telling. I also didn't like Hillary's body language everytime Obama went on the attack against Hillary or Bill. Her facial expression to me was one of disbelief that he would accuse her or Bill of something. As if he was lying and as if she was daring him. She also accused him of always saying that that wasn't what I meant or of explaining hiis actions away when that is what she and Bill ere doing earlier in the New Hampshire Campaign. "Didn't mean that Oama was a fairy tale". If Hillary and Bill take Obama's actions or the things that he says out of context or just a single line of course he is going to have to explain. This is a way of insinuateing things that are not actually true.or only half true. Hillary and Bill Clinton are extremely good at this. I do hope that the people can see through this tactic. Hillary is back to being the cold woman that she was before her tears. She was campaigning not for South Carolina ut for the next primaries. After her performance todate I wouldn't vote for her President. She is one poor actress willing to win at all costs.

Obama will never win the general election, if he should happen to win the DEM nomination. Without his prewritten speech, he is clueless on the issues. You could see how nervous he was when questioned on his record. Other than preaching the words hope, unity, change, he brings nothing else to the table… just an empty suit.

Once again, Hillary owned the stage!

Obama/Edwards '08 INDEED!!!

As the wife of a soldier I cannot send my husband into a world where a woman will be Commander-in-Chief. Yes, I will say it! and I know people won't like it, but have we thought about the fact that the President has to be a global figure in the world we live in. Are countries that still have thoughts(wrong or right) against women even walking without covering their heads. Is the President of the US ready to have real discussions with the political leaders of other countries, while not being allowed to sit next to them. They will end up discussing politics with her husband.

This country needs to unify and pick a strong viable Democratic party leader one who can have conversations with the Republicans that won't include why the Clintons lied to America and Congressional committees about the "private" matters that disgraced this country.

Hillary has my vote.

We need a National Primary Day so that all the states get to choose the nominee and not place so much focus on Iowa, NH, Nevada and SC voters.

Also, 20% of the delegate votes are SUPER-delegate votes which are going overwhelmingly to Clinton because these votes come from democrats in power and who helped most of these get their power - yep - the Clintons.

The democratic party should let democrats/independents choose the candidate and get rid of the Superdelegates.

After you consider the 20% of superdelegates not chosen by the voters and consider the amount of influence Iowa, NH, Nevada and SC voters have over voters in California, Ohio, NY, WV, Tennessee, Kentucky, Texas, etc, etc, etc, you can clearly see why we need to get rid of superdelegates and have a national primary day for every state!

==============================================
1988-1992 - George BUSH
1992-2000 - Bill CLINTON
2000-2008 - George BUSH

20 years!

Do you think electing Bill and Hillary Clinton again will be something that will CHANGE American politics and the agenda in Washington, DC?

Wal-Mart democrats need to open their eyes and realize that the Clintons do not care about them as much as their high dollar supporters and lobbyists.

Once the democrats pick a nominee, the base will solidify behind that candidate - however, Obama has shown the ability to attract republicans and independents - voters that Clinton will have a much tougher time attracting. Thus, in the general election, Obama has a much better shot, especially against a McCain, who has shown his own ability to attract moderate and independent voters.

As a registered voter in this country, I have to admit that I am completely turned off by the type of campaigning that I continue to see going on. The most disturbing thing to me is that the candidates seem more interested in destroying each other's credibility than sharing with the American people why they are the best man or woman to run our country. Will the day ever come when politicians stop seeing themselves as Democrats or Republicans and merely strip themselves down to what they are … Americans? Though only my opinion, it seems like all of the candidates (both Democrats and Republicans) are more interested in their respective affiliations with political parties than they are to their commitment to the American people. And they wonder why people have become disenchanted with the political process.

After watching the Democrats debate tonight, I came away with even less respect for each of the candidates. My advice to each of them … instead of so readily bad-mouthing your opponents, why not just show the American people what you stand for? If a Republican candidate should be elected to the white house in November, he should send each of you a "thank-you" note.

With regards,

Myles Bearden
AN AMERICAN

NoBaamma Baby!

The guy still didn't answer any questions!

He must think we're totally STUPID!

I don't know about other pereceptions, but to me it is very clear that Senator Obama lacks a great deal of substance on any of the issues. Same stories over and over again. It seems he has no clear understanding of what it will take to be president. Only a rose-colored vision. Senator Clinton at least has a direct plan for Iraq and the economy. Obama's health insurance vision is unrealistic. Edwards is still in third place, but lacks the experience factor and that seems to show. Obama, on the other hand, covers the lack of experience with oratorical showmanship. The race is interesting, but Hillary seems to be the one who can get things done. She is a survivor.

I wasn't really impressed with either Obama or Clinton tonight. The only one who really seemed concerned with politics is the long-shot Edwards. The other two candidates seemed content to just send low-blows flying at each other. I honestly don't have a good feeling about either of them right now.

Although, I did enjoy Obama's comments on Bill Clinton's "blackness". Hahahaha.

GORT ….. KLAATU BARAK OBAMA

Bill S….or BS? You need to have your ears and eyes checked..again! Hillary Clinton kicked butt tonight and not just words, but substantial words. We need a leader that is for us and is not afraid to kick a little tail to get things done.

HRC in '08! PERIOD

Clinton is the winner, the smartest, the toughest, the most informed, and the one with the strength to make her points even with a predominantly black audience booing her and applauding Obama.

Bill - I'm voting for un-Bush. Obama is the candidate that will move this country forward. Anti-Bush Billary will only keep us stuck in bitter old battles. Cheers to Obama for standing up and fighting against the old school status quo. A very admired leader, MLK, also fought against the old school status quo. He wasn't always popular with politicians but he stuck with what he believed in.

Dennis Kucinich - the only Democrat who consistently has voted against the Iraq War, the Patriot Act and all funding of the Iraq War - also deserves to share the debate stage.

The U.S. tells the world that it's the model for democracy. Yet in this model, not all candidates get a voice because some get censored by the very media that purports to support the First Amendment. How sad, and we're only, what, four primaries into the selection process.

Kucinich is also the only candidate with a not-for-profit health care plan, which works. Don't believe me. Check out Blue Cross / Blue Shield of Michigan. Not-for-profit works. Period.

Martin Luther King Jr. would have been appalled by tonight's debate, because it was not a forum for all voices.

Shame on CNN for NOT being a voice of change.

Obama has made quite a few distortions of his own over the course of this campaign. However, whenever Hillary calls him on it, he gets indignant and offended despite the fact that he deals out the same types of criticisms all the time. I personally loved the fact that Hillary focused on plans for accomplishing goals, and actual realistic ideas for making things happen, instead of waving a lot of ideals around and expecting and army of rabid supporters to magically carry them all out.

I agree, in my opinion Edwards did have a very good showing tonight. As a woman surrounded by close friends of color I am shocked that people are not really listening to the candidates's message or researching their records but voting based on color or gender and expecting that only will bring change. Follow the money and look at corporate ties. We need to return democracy back to the people and candidate with strong corporate ties will never achieve that. I really think America needs to wake up and get over this reverse discrimination.

Please Get Past the Big Bucks Budgets and Just Listen to John Edwards! The guy is the only candidate that is going beyond sound bites! 90% of America will be better off with this man in office.
B

Hillary will win the nomination if she continues to be precise and firm on her positions. In contrast, Obama did poorly on the economic topic and how could he vote 'present' more than 100 times!?! Yes, he was great with the Iraq issue but it's the economy I am concerned with. We need a leader who will make decisions, both good and bad. No one can make the perfect choice 100% of the time.

Let's face it. Both Obama and Clinton used dirty tactics in Nevada and they are not stopping until one wins.

Hillary clearly was in command of her facts and of this debate. Obama fumbled around and was clearly taken back when he first insulted Hillary with the Walmart comment and didn't expect her to respond in kind…….when she did with the comment on Tony Rezco. she scored a huge point that will be debated in political columns across the nation for days to come. Edwards also scored when he pressed Obama on the PRESENT votes he made as a legislator in Illinois.

Unhappy and pointed as this became, Obama scored points big-time, in showing his will and ability when necessary to go toe to toe. He did so confidently, without being mean-spirited. Gone now are the unfounded notions of his inability to be tough when needed.

One year from now - President Obama.

BUSH CLINTON CLINTON BUSH BUSH CLINTON CLINTON…… and then what BUSH BUSH????

NO WAY

BREAK THE CHAIN NOW… NO TO DYNASTY

NO TO BUSH/CLINTON COALTION

\
]\

\

Hillary Clinton totally kicked it. She has shown, time and again, that she is the candidate that will make the best president. Barack Obama came across as whiney, childish, and bumbling. He doesn't have the ability to be president. He is also very cocky, and I think that is going to hurt him, badly. I, for one, do not want someone who acts cocky running this country. We already have someone running this country who is cocky, and see where that got us.

Hillary Clinton for President! The ONLY choice!

Listening to Sen. Obama tonight, I couldn't help but see that he is and will continue to be an excellent role model for millions of young black men.
At a time when candidates put down Republican ideals(calling them "bad ideas") and insist on being negative or hatching negativity, I have decided that I want some fresh air. In terms of healing America's differences…in terms of having a role model for ALL, Obama is the one. By the way: I am a single, white male who historically believes in a conservative federal government, and I hope that I have the chance to vote for Obama.

I think that Obama has a more realistic approach on tackling the issues left in our White House, our government, among our citizens, and within our society today. In order to be a good leader you have to be able to consider all people: Democratic or Republic, white or black, rich or poor in a country that is in good economic times or bad, and be able to imbody true diplomacy. Obama exhibits this in his character with his plan of action as President of the United States with consideration for all Americans and foreign relations.

Obama is critisized for comments about running agains both Bill and Hillary (Billary!) yet your pundits consistently refer to the Obama or Edwards campaign and the ClintonS campaign….looks like Barak is right! Bill needs to put a sock in it. Let Hillary run on her own. As a woman I am insulted that her '35 years' of experinece are 99% based on being first lady. I worked very hard to support my husband in his chosed profession but in no way could I be a basketball coach no matter how many meetings/scounting reports/practices I attended. At least Barak as done it on his own.

I work in Nevada and Bill Clinton has been making the rounds distorting Obama's record. Obama needed to defend himself. The first punch was thrown way before tonight's debate by the Clinton campaign. Edwards took the high road tonight, but he was the attack dog in the New Hampshire debate. Obama is a honorable person. Go Obama!

PLEASE AMERICANS. and please BARACK. Call Hilary on this "Past 16 years" national security experience non-sense!!!!!!!!!

Hey, Was she the first lady or the president??

Why are you giving her 8 years of presidential experience for being first lady when she did not even have national security clearances. People should continue to raise this point. It was BILL who was president, wasn't it. Of course when Bill runs alont with Hilary it's easy for her to claim his 8 years of being president on her Resume.

Seems its to much some people to swallow, but Clinton clearly highlighted Obama's distortment of issues critical of him and just where noone knows his true position or stand on issues due to his continuing changing like Romney.

Its about time the media and people pinned Obama down and quit showcasing him.

Obummer: "uh uh uh uh let let let let me just say this uh-uh-uh-uh"

Obummer was a smug, arrogant, jerk tonight and I hope he lost a TON of votes because of it. What a piece of work. True Chicago politics, huh?!?

I actually found myself applauding John Edwards a few times tonight. He did a great job in this debate. But…

Hillary Clinton ALL THE WAY TO THE WHITE HOUSE!!!!!!!

Matthew,

Which debate were you watching? Obama answered every attack

Obama had to defend himself against the mud Clintons have been flinging on him. He did a great job. Go Obama

The time has past for politics Hillary and Bill style. The current situation of our union is calling for fresh approaches and out of the box thinking. Hilary's campaign has showed that she can't do that. She has overestimated the American's people desire for anything but politics as usual and rather than embrace it and use her considerable intelligence and resources to match Obama's ideas with some of her own, she ops to go negative…like a typical Washington ' old school ' politician.

Edwards beat them ALL tonight!
Even on DU where there are partisans everywhere it is acknowleged!
The other 2 came off as school yard bullies taunting each other!.
Edwards was professional and poised and kept to the ISSUES!

Go, JOHNNY < GO< GO < GO!

Why was former President Clinton falling asleep at an MLK event? I was apalled that he was clearly snoozin' during a speech by MLK's son. Has CNN noticed this or is it only Yahoo reporting this? Yahoo has video of it and former President Clinton is clearing dozing off? What is this all about? Is the campaign trail keeping him up?

Edwards did better tonight but ,unfortunate for him, he's too far behind to win. Hillary showed that she was more knowledgeable in all the issues, Obama showed his lack of knowledge, maturity and experience. That said, I was turned off by both Hillary and Obama for their personnal attack.

I used to be a diehard Bill Clinton fan. I was never a Hillary fan. People need to recognize that Bill and Hillary are not the same people. I think many voters are nostalgic for the Bill Clinton era. We're in a different time and there is no guarantee Hillary will be able to pull off a Clinton type presidency. In fact, Obama is more like Bill Clinton. The new kid on the block, ready to infuse new blood in a badly needed system. Clinton has morphed from new kid, to stodgy "old guard." It is definitely time for the changing of the guard. From the start, Obama wanted to keep the campaign on the issues, the Clintons (in a very chess like manner) managed to get him off his game. I hope he goes back to center and stay on message and not blink as the Clintons try to distract him from his mission.

From a feminist stance, I am not impressed with Hillary. In essence, she has unleashed her husband to battle for her. Is that what she will do in office. Send her husband off to fight her battles. What does that say? Not only did King, in her view, need a sitting white president see his dream fulfulled, but a woman needs a man to fight her battles to see her dream fulfilled. UGH!!! Grow a backbone Hillary, fight your own battles!!!

After all is said and done, the debate was a wash among all of them; I loved the heated exchange between Clintion and Obama. The Dems need to toughen up and get prepared for November when one of them will take on the slim and slander machine of the Repulse-icans. I hope America wakes up before another Repulse-ican gets elected and ruins our County beyond recognition!!!

Hillary was so much more sharp on this issues than the other candidates. It is clear she is the smartest. John Edwards had his best showing. It is clear that Obama is not ready. He was awful. Obama was emotional, confused, and defensive. I feel sorry for him, he showed poorly. CNN gave Obama a pass and failed to give Hillary credit for her good showing. The media has always been tough on the Clintons. Edwards got credit for his good showing.

Hi Bill,

Bush campaigned on building bridges based on his experience as Governor of Texas. He never came through on his promise, in fact, it became more partisan under his leadership.

Desperate times for desperate politicians……………….maybe they should get a gentle snow on the South Carolina fields like the field in Wizard of Oz………take a nap and start again tomorrow! All this bickering is confusing for the voters who seem to be genuinely interested this year…………

To answer the question….the primary voters will prefer John Edwards. This from a registered Republican.

The truth on the particulars and strategy of voting "present" in the Illinois legislature is available at multiple locations on the internet. Rather than try to spin anything, I'll just suggest you go search for the info on your own, like every informed voter should. Try to stick to reputable sources, and not opinion pieces.

Tonight Hillary represented the old Clinton political machine. Attacks, falsehoods, win at any cost scheming…definitely not someone who will unite America, let alone the Democratic base. We need fresh blood in our White House and someone who has at least the possibility to bring America together. I wish Obama would of just said it. No, Bill Clinton was not the first black American president. If I were black I would be apalled at even the suggestion that he fills that role. He has only used blacks to further his own political goals, not because he has any common ground or history with African Americans. It appears Hillary is playing that same scam. America, this time we can do better than a Clinton.

Same old Hillary…..shrill…….arrogant………how int he worl can anyone actually believe anything that comes out of her mouth…..I vote Edwards first, Obama second….I will never vote for Hillary

I think is true Edwards is a nice guy but really he has been talking about same ideas for last 8 years.

About obama and Clinton I was amazed how negative and arrogant obama was. He start or end the questions when I am a president .

And about truth less get real I realize is easy not to vote and people that made decision now he is attacking them on their record.

And about the race if obama was a white man with same experience I don’t think that African American would of think a minute vote for him and not hillary because they know she is the best of three. And this is interesting to say that this is not racist way to think , so lets stop all this emotional thinking and vote for the experience.

Walmart and the Chinese Connection a new movie Starring ,Guess who?

What I took a way from tonight's debate was the feeling that Edwards and Clinton are ready to run for presidency. Obama seems as if he needs a few more years to understand, especially on certain points, the fundamentals of the Democratic party and seriously stand for something. I'm a minority and think an African-American president would be great. BUT… this is reality, and what is real to me is the need for a strong person to become president and make the adjustments our country needs. We need someone solid now, more than ever. After the debate tonight, he has lost me. Maybe the next time around. Maybe.

Roger - you think the Clinton Campaign has been deplorable? Didn't you hear Obama attack Clinton within the first ten minutes of the debate tonght??? He is not high and mighty by any stretch. He slung mud tonight more than anyone.

Sen. Clinton won this debate hands down. Her presentation was far superior to Obama. Interesting that Edwards was more pro-Hillary tonight. I see a Clinton/Edwards ticket in November. Sen. Obama will go back to being a Junior Senator from IL.

Sen, Obama did not answer the questions, he was smug (ie "I'll be the one overseeing things in a year") and obviously was in over his head.

I think Obama needs to learn how to get his point across without stumbling over his words.

I think Hillary stood up for herself and didn't take anything from Obama.

Edwards seems to switch sides depending on who won the last caucus. In one debate he was on Obama side and this one he was quick to side with Hillary.

Dear "The Bard"
You fail to mention any real issues and only marketing tactics in your post… Please flesh it out for us. How is Clinton or Obama Better than Edwards other than your own perceived electability? Words are butt wind… or something like that William S.

If Hillary Clinton gets the Democratic nomination, I will be voting Republican regardless of the Republican candidate!

if you think the left had it in for Bush the last 8 years, just imagine the hatred the right would have for clinton if she would win by a slim margin just winning the traditional blue states plus Ohio or Florida. If we want America to not be like it has been the last eight years then we will have to choose someone other than clinton like a McCain or Obama.

Obama's views don't keep changing — you Hillary trolls just say that here to mislead readers.

This evening, Barack discussed getting a significant majority in November in order to win the election for Democrats. Obviously this means getting states like South Carolina, North Carolina, Georgia, etc, to become blue states. Additionally, John Edwards discussed not just spending time in South Carolina to win the primary but also to better position him to win South Carolina in the general election. Many of the media stations have pointed out the Hillary Clinton is leaving South Carolina for Bill to stump and she's moving on tomorrow to other states-NY, FL & CA. I believe there are two issues that should be pointed out. 1. If she is truly running for president on her own merit, why is she leaving South Carolina, a state that Democrats could win in November, to Bill? 2. If Hillary plans on beating a John McCain, in November, how is she going to accomplish this if she doesn't get buy in during the primarys? I believe Barack is trying to do things differently and Hillary says she is but her actions do not align. As we've learned, the candidate who gets the most votes in November doesn't always win.

We watched the debate tonight. I find it hard to believe Obama's claims to be a "uniter" when he can't even get along with Hilary Clinton.

I think John Edwards did well tonight, and we'll be voting for him in the SC primary this Saturday.

Obama exemplified the true agent of change tonight. I must say again that he is the only democrat i see who can pull the disillusioned republicans and Independant voters away from the Republican front runner in November and win the election for the Democrats….. Go Obama!!!!!

I'm a Republican that voted for Bush the last two elections.
What a disaster he has been, but I never saw a good alternative…
Until Barack Obama. This man has the grace of JFK, the ability to communicate like Reagan, and the intelligence of Thomas Jefferson.
I would vote for Obama over Huckabee, Clinton, McCain, or Edwards.
I would be proud to consider myself an Obama Republican.

Hillary really is so polarizing and grating on even the Democrats… The country deserves a break!! PLEASE! since 1981 we have had a Bush or Clinton in national office

Let's Start Again!

Barack truly is our only HOPE!

on MLK Jr day we had a real debate

Obama was brought down tonight. There ain't enough fairy dust to keep him flying on wings of a dove. You guys are getting this all wrong. When Hillary presented her position on the economy and rebates, she tried to answer the question and explain. What did Baracko do….just give some more enlightentment. Give credit were credit is do. And voting present on 30 percent interest rates on a credit card?????????Now I see why my cousin in Illinois is in debt for life!!

Hillary has my vote!

I am a African American female who has lived in California for 23 years (by way of Detroit). There are many times that I feel undecided. There is something good about all the candidates. I am most concerned about the economy. I am one of those who will be directly about housing crisis & no medical care. After listening to the debates, I've finally decided on Mrs. Clinton. I really admire her record. I have never really gotten over the work her husband has done and meant for our race. I like Obama, but I've come to settle of Clinton.

obviously Cnn is biased against Hillary Clinton as most of the pro Clinton comments have been severely edited down to nothing and/or eliminated altogether. Ok that's alright…we will still have the right to vote and to He** with all the biased pundits.

Edwards was a clear winner tonight, looked presidential and with a message while Hillary and Obama were doing were personal attacks, continue the bickering and trowing mud to one another, I definitely very disappointed on those two candidates and I am leaning for Edwards now.

I will vote for Hillary!

This Party's bickering, in the end, is draining and a little depressing. The Democrats are fighting each other on core value issues? I really put this chasm squarely on the Clinton camp.

I think Hillary is just too divisive, even to my own party. I am a core base voter, and I will not vote Hillary because of her sick, shady tactics; the Dems are in deep trouble if our core won't vote Hilary. If she goes up in the Primary, instead of the Dems being able to win a race that we absolutely should win, we'll have to fight the Republicans this year. This year. 2008. Eight years after the disastrous Bush, and we'll have to fight. What does that say about Hillary?

And if the Independents don't put up a 3rd party candidate and it's just a two-person race, I think the Republicans will be awakened from their apathy and shame and rally to vote against Hillary.

If the Dems lose 2008….thanks for nothing Hillary. And Bill.

After watching tonight's debate it was clear that although Hillary didn't have her strongest debate she was able to bring some light on Obama's past and to the credit of Edwards, show some weaknesses in Obama's campaign. Which was very crucial to her campaign at this juncture. I would of liked it if she herself was aggressively drawing those distinctions and asking point-blank questions to Obama just as how Edwards did, but if weren't for Edwards her debate performance would have been average at best. She is still the candidate to beat however and is delivering a very substantive national campaign. Edwards had yet