January 21, 2008
Posted: January 21st, 2008 08:36 PM ET

ALT TEXT

Sens. Clinton and Obama engaged early on in the South Carolina debate (Photo Credit: Getty Images)

MYRTLE BEACH, South Carolina (CNN) – Wow. This is the most heated debate to date. Obama brings up Clinton's one-time corporate ties to Wal-Mart, and Clinton brings up the Illinois senator's now-severed ties to a Chicago slum lord. This is usually the stuff of surrogates, not the candidates themselves.

Edwards took the high road, if only to try to change the debate narrative because it didn't include him. It made him look more presidential than either.

– CNN Political Analyst Bill Schneider

Filed under: Bill Schneider


Cyndy, California   January 22nd, 2008 1:30 pm ET

There was nothing wrong w/Hillary being on the Wal-Mart during her term serving as a lawyer – more POWER to her. For Obama to make a sarcastic remark about her position was not call for, but she came out fighting with his connection with Rezko and his slum landlord dealings and got Boo'ed. That was totally unfair for the audience to boo her, and all she was doing is defending herself.

Obama is always talking about "A Change", we see change every 4 years when we vote in office a President – the economy changes, whether it's good or bad we see a change. But, what we need "HOW YOU R GOING TO CHANGE THE ECONOMY"! He has not spoken any concrete on how he can bring this economy out of the its dilemna. As far as the war, everyone is in agreement, bringing the soldiers home. I like Obama as a person, a great orator, and a very educated African American man, but he lacks experience...he is not ready to hold such an office of a President. He should continue as a Senator, gain more experience and plead more cause that bear records and then come back 2013.

Lynn   January 22nd, 2008 11:36 am ET

And.... the more I think about it, the more I am coming 'round to my decision. I will strongly support John Edwards. He is principled and, by remaining above the fray, proved that the word "politician" is not necessarily dirty. Go John!

Lynn   January 22nd, 2008 11:30 am ET

This was not a "debate." I found myself becoming angrier and angrier with Wolf Blitzer for allowing (particularly Hillary Clinton) candidates to take over the airtime and deliver firebrand speeches rather than providing clear, concise, to-the-point answers. Barack Obama acquitted himself calmly and elegantly in the face of Clinton's shrewish rantings, which only hurt her cause. And John Edwards, who is clear, well-spoken and earnest, deserves better than to be marginalized by Blitzer. He has to fight to speak, and he has an important message. Blitzer should apologize to him publicly and be sure he gets more than his share of alloted time to speak in the next debate.

Roberta Rager   January 22nd, 2008 3:50 am ET

Get a life this is a bunch of Republicans!
Democrats hate the Clinton's NO WAY! LOOK AT HIS APPROVAL RATING, THEY THE MEDIA ARE TRYING AGAIN TO GET A REPUBLICAN IN BY PUSHING OBAMA, WHY ELSE WOULD THEY GO TO THE EDGE FOR HIM JUST LIKE FOR BUSH, LOOK AT THE COUNTRY BECAUSE OF THE MEDIA, These people are dirty tricks Republicans the media is lying for Obama for the republicans to run against. And Republicans ARE bloging as democrat's. I believe this!!!!!!!!

Bertie   January 22nd, 2008 3:35 am ET

As I read most of these comments all I see is a bunch of Karl Rove Republicans!
Most Democrats do not hate the Clinton's and are intelligent thinkers, These people are dirty tricks Republicans, My thought to you few that are honestly interested in voting for one or the other should understand they are Dirty tricks republicans. Everyone who watched the debate and watches TV knows Baraka started the war between him and Hillary with the media help along with Republicans bloging as democrat's

Graham   January 22nd, 2008 2:41 am ET

As an interested European I stayed up all night to watch the debate.
I thought the bickering was fine, insofar as it showed the candidates under the pressure of face-to-face confrontation, but it lost its relevance because of the obvious personal animosity between the two front runners.
For people competing for the most grown-up job in the world it degenerated to the infantile, and if they'd been two squabbling siblings most parents would have banged their heads together.
When I got divorced, I read that every barb ex-spouses fire at one another comes to rest in the hearts of their offspring, and tried to remember that at all times. I think something similar applies here, that every taunt between Clinton and Obama recruits another vote for the Republicans, and judging by previous posts on this thread that seems to be the case.
As such, if the pair persist they should both be indicted for being unpatriotic and doing the American people a great disservice, for not instead focussing on the details of how thay would flesh out their differing policies, to give the electorate a real and informed choice.

JMOk   January 22nd, 2008 2:16 am ET

I listened to Edwards talk about how he and Senator Clinton both had "Universal" health plans. He pushed a point that Obama didn't include illegal aliens that are in the United States. Edwards made it clear that he and Clinton both included the mexican citizens that are currently living in the United States because they have "universal" plans.
I would like to know if Edwards and Clinton are also including Mexican citizens that are currently living in Mexico as well? What about countries overseas as well? I'm positive that they don't intend to do that because it wouldn't make sense.
If they're wanting to include mexican citizens inside the U.S., then why not the Mexican citizens currently living in Mexico?
If you think about it, what's the diffference? They're ALL mexican citizens, whether they're currently living in the U.S. or Mexico.
Obama is right-on when he doesn't include them. I'm a U.S. citizen and I can assure you that I never intend on sending my income to Mexico for their healthcare.. especially when I can barely afford my own for my family.
I hadn't quite made up my mind until tonight. I'm keeping an open mind until all is said and done just before the elections, but I can tell you that now I know almost for certain who my vote belongs to.

Susan Bryant   January 22nd, 2008 1:27 am ET

AS a democrat and a woman , I will not vote for HILLARY CLINTON if she gets the DEMOCRATIC NOMINATION...I am sick and tired of The CLINTONS and their endless lies.They both have no ethics or morals at all and will do and say anything to get back in W.H., They are both DESPICABLE and CONNIVING. BARACK OBAMA has my FULL SUPPORT, I am even caucusing for him now and sending him a big donation tonight ,,,OBAMA for AMERICA 08

GaryO Virginia Beach   January 22nd, 2008 12:24 am ET

Go Hillary!!

GaryO Virginia Beach   January 22nd, 2008 12:20 am ET

What was Obama's problem with Hillary's corporate ties to Wal-Mart?

Wal-Mart is based out of Arkansas and so were the Clintons. Hillary was a
Wal-Mart board member. Is that a bad thing?

It's not like being the paid politico of a slum lord, but I suppose some people (the Cult of Obama) could construe that something is wrong in being a Wal-Mart board member.

deborah   January 21st, 2008 11:39 pm ET

Yes, he did. But in tonight's 'show', anyone with any timing
and a sense of humor (as Edwards has) could see that it
was definitely time for the straight man to do his thing
and get the laugh (and cool the heat). Which it did.
Maybe the candidates should call each other on issues directly. The
surrogates lately have been doing it badly and getting too much bad press. They
all need to chill. ( And if Mrs. Obama ever goes on full launch mode,
whoa baby.)

Rather than snipes, this approach should be modified
to actually talk about the elements of those records we keep hearing
about.

The funny thing is, in the last 2 debates, these 3 look like they could
get along real well if this pesky little election thing wasn't hanging over
their heads...

Lorrie Graves   January 21st, 2008 11:16 pm ET

I can't dispute that Hillary can talk non-stop on just about any topic, but I don't see the results of her grandiose ramblings. Hillary is politics as usual, big money, big connections and a hunger for power. And she even has Billy boy to take her by the hand and coronate her. And just what did Billy boy do while he was in office that was so grand, besides getting laid a few times and being impeached. Now perhaps we can look forward to Billary and Billy boy esconced in the White House with all the frills while they throw crumbs out to the poor and middle class. At least my vote for Obama will be one step toward stopping the Clintons. Obama is our only hope for breaking the cycle of politics as usual.

Kelly   January 21st, 2008 11:05 pm ET

As a woman I feel so sad..... Hillary has lost my vote... you have made me fee ill!

Obama Edwards o8

JT   January 21st, 2008 11:00 pm ET

Regarding Bein Careful's comment on universal health care –

Excuse me? You think the emergency room is the solution rather than universal health care? Do yo urealize you're paying each time someone without health care insurance goes to the ER?!!!! Those are your tax dollars at work paying for Medicaid and similar state-funded programs. Those who are in this country illegally, who can't afford health care coverage use the ER as the port of last resort - it's like a huge national band-aid. And your solution is to never take the band-aid off! Get real. I've never heard anything more ridiculous in my life. Maybe you should vote for the Republicans since clearly that's where your sympathies lie – with the status quo.

viviajoy   January 21st, 2008 10:58 pm ET

Iam not voting on pride or prejudice,Icertainly am voting on reality Barack comes across as being too arrogant.I think he should display some humility.

vivia

Paul   January 21st, 2008 10:53 pm ET

While I too like many were somewhat embarrassed by what seemed like unpresidential behavior, I'm glad Hillary stood up for herself. I respect and admire Sen. Obama, but I beleive Sen Clinton brings to the table what counts most hard fought and hard learned experience

nc   January 21st, 2008 10:49 pm ET

I don’t know where is BIG B from . But go head and renounce your citizenship.

Looks like your not making your decision base on fact but base on emotions. Hillary did very well and I know she will be a next president because is the best one to run our country.

Linda   January 21st, 2008 10:47 pm ET

Finally a debate that didn't make me yawn.

VALtheGREAT   January 21st, 2008 10:47 pm ET

Clinton is a mudslinger. Obama cannot be clear on what in his record is accurate or not. Hell, I am going for Edwards. I could care less about Clinton and Obama's tit for tat schoolyard fight. GO EDWARDS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

mat   January 21st, 2008 10:46 pm ET

Bill Clinton is running for his THIRD TERM using Hillary on the ballot. There is lot at stake here. Corporates, lobbyists, outsourcing agencies and insurance agencies cannot afford a loss to Hillary. They have 30 years of association with Hillary and Bill. It's a shame that Clintons are DESPERATELY TRYING TO retain their DYNASTY. It's time that others be given a chance.
Mat

Ruth Sessions   January 21st, 2008 10:44 pm ET

Thanks CNN, for:
1. Reminding me how glad I am that I changed my voter registration to Independent and

2. Eliminating any need to make a decision about voting for either Hillary or Obama in the general election. My choice is none of the above after their performance tonight.

Pat   January 21st, 2008 10:44 pm ET

Why are my comments still awaiting moderation? I guess you can't take the heat either - you are all "OBAMA BOYS"

dennis   January 21st, 2008 10:43 pm ET

Go Hillary!!!!!!!!!!

Tom   January 21st, 2008 10:35 pm ET

Well, for me tonight was the deciding factor. I don't get to vote in a primary untl March 4th but I have decided on Obama. I was impressed with his demeanor, his ability to get to the root of problems and to see things in a very fundamentally different way. I believe his style of governing will be fundamentally different from that of HRC, who came off as self effacing and same-ol, same-ol. So now I guess I'm off to find the Obama website and make a donation. FINALLY!

jeff   January 21st, 2008 10:34 pm ET

CNN's first instinct was to cast a vibrant debate in the style of a tabloid headline. so much for the the media's significant contribution to an ongoing discussion

mary,CR.IA   January 21st, 2008 10:32 pm ET

why is every one saying kudos to Edwards, but are not willing to vote for him!!!!? mkes me nuts!

Stephen Arnold   January 21st, 2008 10:31 pm ET

Hillary Clinton showed a clear understanding of the facts. She is tough and fair.

EK   January 21st, 2008 10:30 pm ET

Finally, Obama is standing up against Hillary and Bill Clinton. People needed to see this. I'm so sick of the Clinton's twisting the facts to suit their political gain. Obama came back with a punch at the right time in the debate with Hillary working for Walmart. It was simply great. I cheered.

Anne   January 21st, 2008 10:17 pm ET

I thought John Edwards was the outstanding person in this debate. It appeared that he would have liked to spend more time on the things we want to hear about.

Heidi   January 21st, 2008 10:15 pm ET

I realize people do not like the candidates going after each other, but what do you think the Republicans are going to do in the general election? Why do you think we call it "swift boating?" That was the Republicans continuing to tell lies until voters that may not be so educated on the issues believe those lies. We need to be tough and stand up for our beliefs instead of being nice. I currently favor Barack, but it pains me to read people saying things like "if Hillary wins, I won't vote" or I will just vote Republican. Are you serious? So, if Huckabee won his party's nomination, you would vote for someone who wants to rewrite the Constitution to favor the religious zealots? Hillary may have baggage, but she is a proven leader. I remember when the Iraq war was merely the White House spouting the lies about Saddam having yellow cake uranium and weapons of mass destruction. There were many polls asking the American people how they felt about a war with Iraq. 85% to 90% of the American people believed it was a good idea. How many of the people that are against it now, were for it then?

Ken   January 21st, 2008 10:12 pm ET

I'm gonna say Hillary started this the problem here is this.Bill is pretty much fighting her battles for her.She doesn't know how to attack Obama on her own.I don't think people can put up with Bush,Clinton,Bush,Clinton all the back and fourth presidency.

David   January 21st, 2008 10:06 pm ET

I think this will be the soundbite moment on the morning news tomorrow. I can't understand what what point Sen. Obama was trying to raise by saying Sen. Clinton was a board member of Walmart. But I never knew Sen. Obama had a legal client whom was a slumlord. I doubt most Americans understand his response that as an Associate in his firm (non-decision member) he was not a decision maker with regards to the client or his case. I was initially shocked that Se. Clinton said what she said, but then I was even more shocked when, the first time Sen. Obama had a chance to challenge the comment, he chose to stick to the topic. The real headline would have been how Sen. Obama ducked/avoided/whatever the obvious attack. But Wolf Blitzer saved him by asking him to respond rto Sen. Clinton. How could he not respond? Yikes!

Joe   January 21st, 2008 10:06 pm ET

EricNAtl, just pointing out that Obama speaks the truth when he lays out the differences about the Illinois legislature system. That BAM more or less points out the fact that he will won't settle to make compromise, and he's not afraid to point out the flaws in legislative acts. Voting present is just Illinois' way of fixing bills.

R S   January 21st, 2008 10:03 pm ET

Obama , Why don't just sit down an shut up. Maybe listen to the others you may learn a little more than you think you know . No it is not your time for a higher office. Sorry .

Tiffany W.   January 21st, 2008 10:02 pm ET

Obama '08

Thea   January 21st, 2008 10:00 pm ET

Obama calmly, consistently , and with humor answers even the most ridiculous questions, like whether Bill Clinton is "blacker" than he is.
Why the Bill question anyway? It's Hillary who's running.
Obama is eloquent, honest, and human.
The real deal.

Pat   January 21st, 2008 10:00 pm ET

I semi agree with Joe.

If Obama becomes the Democratic candidate, I and other plan to vote for the Republican candidate in the general elections. OBAMA WILL NOT BE OUR NEXT PRESIDENT!

SCNTEXAS   January 21st, 2008 10:00 pm ET

Hillary Clinton is as big a liar as her husband. She is manipulative and will say or do anything to win. She is a dangerous piraña.

Jeff   January 21st, 2008 9:57 pm ET

Hillary has lost her cool a couple of times and made a fool of herself. Obama has looked pretty good. Edwards needs to go away. What a night!

BDP   January 21st, 2008 9:57 pm ET

I have never seen Hillary so defensive. Obama is better grounded; especially in stressful situations.

Brian   January 21st, 2008 9:56 pm ET

To Big B – Why the Clintons? They didn't send you and your family into an unfocused war. Where are your grievances? The Republicans-slash-oil executives did, and they did so without adequate planning. Seems simple to me. I admire your efforts and sacrifices but doubt the overall purpose. Yes, America needs oil, but at what expense? Excuse, but now that expense is now definitely going to cost the next 2 generations dearly since they will be required to pay back the world for this 6-year long pointless war. The money spent on the war to date could have also been spent on AIDS in Africa, Homelessness in America, and advances in alternative energy. Again why the Clintons?

Onica   January 21st, 2008 9:56 pm ET

EJ, why would Hillary Clinton be the best person for president. Why can't anyone see that she is willing to say anything or do anything "shedding a few tears" to get votes. Can't anyone see through the fakeness and hear through her whiny, shrilling voice.

ak   January 21st, 2008 9:55 pm ET

Please stay on task when telling each candidate they have 30 seconds for rebuttal. Sen. Obama tends to run on, slipping into his stump speech over and over again. Sen. Clinton has shown strength tonight, bringing up specific plans for health and Iraq, all the while not backing down under pressure. Brava Hillary.

Kevin Waugh   January 21st, 2008 9:52 pm ET

I think John Edwards won this debate. He was clear, precise, and passionate about his policies. We need someone who is willing to fight, and I beleive he is it. Until tonight I was unsure, but he convinced me.

kelmal   January 21st, 2008 9:51 pm ET

Inspiration can be another word for hot air. Sounds like salesperson (get the tech spec sheets and talk to crew in R&D...for the real info)

Results/what you deliver is much more critical.

k

Teddy, ND, IN   January 21st, 2008 9:50 pm ET

Listen when I tell you this: Edwards will not get 30 percent in the SC primary. Obama will win at least 45 to 55 percent with the fight for second place. Obama will receive at least 70% of the Black vote guaranteeing him the win. He will win 30 – 45% of the white vote, winning the primary in a land slide. He will have the delegate lead and the momentum going into Feb. 5. We will all cry on Jan 20, 2009 when President Obama is sworn in as president of these United States of America.

kelmal   January 21st, 2008 9:46 pm ET

All for universal healthcare.

Let the gov't negotiate (a la Medicare) and narrow Ins industry admin OH/profits down to 5%...see how many 'players' stay in the game (FYI, I come from the hc insurance industry....they are laughing all the way to the bank under current system).

Raise the tax rates..flat 30% across the board all the way to the top (no magic deductions, etc) with no taxes below certain level......great source of funds for long over due programs.

BTW, check out the French hc system...superb (lived there x 3 yrs). Makes US look like third world nation.

k

pooja   January 21st, 2008 9:46 pm ET

These attacks are turning me off politics. I think obamas record should be called into question and it has been, however i dont agree that he is whining. He is not. When you are constantly put on the defensive, in a 30 second rebuttal, what do you expect.

He explained his present votes. Maybe those 100 present votes were a bad move by obama. What about the rest of his 3900 votes that were smart? how come billary isnt complimenting him for those?

Edwards talks a lot of sense but he is not going to win this nomination, he should drop out.

Bruce   January 21st, 2008 9:43 pm ET

The more I watch this debate the more I like McCain.

ed   January 21st, 2008 9:42 pm ET

Does anyone ever connect consider that Clinton's trade agreements with China ....are directly contibuting to Global Climate change......certainly there are more greenhouse gas making factories in China because of the Clintons.

christine malloy   January 21st, 2008 9:41 pm ET

Why are my comments always awaiting moderation??

Brian   January 21st, 2008 9:39 pm ET

Barack's thought patterns are failing me miserably. There are too many breaks in his speach patterns, too many "uhs". OH NO, please... not another 8 years of comical Presidential news conferences without any substance. A president must be able to speak clearly always!

dc   January 21st, 2008 9:36 pm ET

A son from the south, a woman, and... is there a third candidate????

Bruce   January 21st, 2008 9:33 pm ET

They eliminate the rules, sit them down and everyone wants to have a tea party. I guess we are all friends now.

christine malloy   January 21st, 2008 9:33 pm ET

Obama reads his "stuff" when he can't get to sleep at night. What is he doing while he is awake???? Wake up America. Look at this guy. He is not of presidential material. I do not want him sending my son into war as "W" did. How did he get this far. I love Hillary, but vote for John if you don't like her. Obama would be a disaster as a president!!!! By the way, my son wants smart at the helm when he goes to war. He has been on 2 tours to Iraq & a Bronze star reccipient. He wants smart!!!

Brian   January 21st, 2008 9:31 pm ET

Barack is coming on way too strong, way too defensive, while stagin himself as being on the offense. Sorry, I see right through him. And when he does stage a direct attack against Hillary, she always comes back with a clear response without saying so many "uhs". This is clear sign that I am tired of George's poor speaking skills and would refuse to listen to another 8 mores years of "uhs". This debate is proving to be the most fascinating to date for it is the first that pits the two frontrunners against each other in front of their most desired audience and one that doesn't hesitate to acknowledge with applause every valid point. An audience that is more representative than before of our African-Americans. Barack likes to say "they" should vote for what's best for them, but I hope "they" realize that statement is just a larger part of his "empty" promise. I absolutely loved seeing him attack Hillary so directly tonight. This has confirmed my belief that Barack is unelectable. He's a poor debater. John is correctly positioning himself for the long term. This time around is not his turn, the next will be. Tonight is my first moment of disappointing realization that Barack will not be electable in 8 years. Then there's the "black president Bill" question.... gotta go!!

Erin   January 21st, 2008 9:29 pm ET

To Vonna: Did you get to pick your middle name? I know that I didn't and I don't think that Barack did either. You need to find a different way to attack a candidate.

SPR   January 21st, 2008 9:26 pm ET

Listening to the debate tonight, I would have to agree that Obama does not have the experience needed. Instead of considering "attacks" and commenting on them, he was too defensive and did not show maturity (experience) in how he answered. I do not want a President who raises his voice to another country's leader because he does not like what was said. I want one that is going to try to work through problems and remain calm. We need a cool head not a hot head in the oval office.

Erin   January 21st, 2008 9:24 pm ET

I would never vote for Hillary Clinton. She worked for 35 years on poverty and – Oh My God – its still there. She is all talk and no action. If she is the nominee, I will vote Republican for the first time in my life.

Sam   January 21st, 2008 9:24 pm ET

This is not a heated debate is much as Barack presenting a heated defense against Hillary's gross misrepresentation and distortion of the facts. That's what her campaign has been about from the beginning... confusing voters, not inspiring them.

joe   January 21st, 2008 9:24 pm ET

Im a democrat, but if its not clinton as the nominee, i will be republican.

Robert   January 21st, 2008 9:20 pm ET

Either Barack or Hillary is going to be the nominee and this exchange is bringing them both down – probably helping the Republican nominee with each blow.

Paul   January 21st, 2008 9:18 pm ET

Too bad CNN didn't have the honesty to put Dennis Kucinich (the only candidate who wants to dump NAFTA) in the debate. Who decides which candidates can compete for the presidency–obviously since Iowa on, it's the corporate media. CNN, FOX & ABC have all proven this beyond a doubt. This election is fixed. I've lost all respect for the media in this country & globally, too.

christine malloy   January 21st, 2008 9:16 pm ET

Hillary is the next President of the US. She can stand up to that Macmood Abinishad, you know the guy from Iran, hope I got the spelling right. Obama is a light weight. Stop treating him like he is a hero!! And check out his total background. We know eveything about all the other candidates. What do we know about Obama??? Nothing!!!!!!!

xtina -chicago IL   January 21st, 2008 9:12 pm ET

Even though Hillary is a bad choice to lead our country, I dont have a problem with her having served on Wal-Mart's BOD. It's a bit hypocritical of her to go from working with a company that's against unions to now rallying around the union people. ( It's like being an opportunist, not sticking to your convictions . )

Mike   January 21st, 2008 9:11 pm ET

Hillary is proving once again she's a power hungry nasty individual with no class.

M Miranda   January 21st, 2008 9:11 pm ET

THIS IS WHY IAM AN INDEPENDENT –
THESE DEBATES ARE A JOKE
WE ALL INDEPENDNETS SHOULD FORM A NATIONAL PARTY – AND DO NOT GIVE OUR VOTES TO EITHER DEMOCRATS OR REPUBLICANS....
IT IS TIME TO DELCARE OUR INDEPENDANCE AGAIN FROM -POLITICAINS THAT ARE OWN BY CORPORATIONS OR ORGANIZATIONS ....

Bruce   January 21st, 2008 9:09 pm ET

To EJ, Healthcare for eveyone would still not be the same for everyone. Study the healthcare systems in other countries and see how far short they really fall from anything you would really want and then you understand that anyone that can afford it comes here.

dissapointed democrat   January 21st, 2008 9:08 pm ET

As I watch this debate I am embarrassed for the democratic party. I'm reminded of the ugliness I too quickly forgot of the clintons. Hillary looks like a pit bull and this election has not brought out Bill's "better side"! ...at this moment, I am not inspired – just embarrassed for the democrats and seriously considering the integrity of a man named John McCain. Let's hope this primary gets back to inspiration and hope and away from this Clinton mud slinging!

christine malloy   January 21st, 2008 9:07 pm ET

To Big B I have a military person who is a Navy SEAL & taht persdon supports Hillary!!!!! Christine

John   January 21st, 2008 9:04 pm ET

Clinton failed to say win the war (peace) in Iraq. Can't admit that surge worked. Lame.

Elaine MA   January 21st, 2008 9:03 pm ET

Right on Christine Malloy..... Obama has been the golden boy....Obama get's away with addressing Sen. Clinton ....as.....She said this and She says that...Obama's not Mature enough to be President of my Country.

Ron C   January 21st, 2008 9:01 pm ET

EDWARDS IS ALL OVER OBAMA

christine malloy   January 21st, 2008 9:01 pm ET

To Bein Careful, everyone who goes to the Emergency Department does not have health care. You are sadly mistaken. You pay tons more for folks to go to the ED. The folks who come to the ED are in very bad shape and wind up costing lots more than they would if they had preventive health care. Get the facts Bein Careful Christine Malloy.

EJ   January 21st, 2008 9:01 pm ET

Hillary is the strongest candidate out there and is not taking any guff from Obama. Obama talks alot and doesnt say anything clear cut. He has NO PLAN. He praises the Republicans and waivers on every point. He continuously says the same thing verbatum each and everytime. Check the internet, whether it is the proper answer for the subject or not.....it is always the same answer. Obama is stumbling and stuttering while trying to figure out which preconcieved phrase may work. Too many cheap shots to Hillary. She is a tough cookie and would make the perfect President. She has defined plans and would be the only one that would work for the middle and poor people. I love her compassion on health care. About time we had a president that would get the American Healthcare for everyone like alot of countries. Gotta lover her!!!

Ron C   January 21st, 2008 9:00 pm ET

CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM-– THE MONEY SPENT ON THESE CAMPAIGNS COULD REDIRECT OUR ECONOMY

Big B   January 21st, 2008 9:00 pm ET

HEY HILLARY SUPPORTERS / ANTI-MILITARY PEOPLE... I wonder if a military coup is possible in the US? Because she is the worst candidate for military folks out there....

K   January 21st, 2008 9:00 pm ET

Obviously all Barack cares about is bashing Hillary. That is definately why he should not be president.

Bruce   January 21st, 2008 9:00 pm ET

Senators should then be included in the same healthcare plan. Oh, my mistake they all have enoug $$$$ to pay as they go for top of the line health care.

M Miranda   January 21st, 2008 8:58 pm ET

CNN is bias- Wolf looks like he support Obama – This guy is a motivation speaker with a lot of spin – Edwards is the smarter of them and make sense

gary   January 21st, 2008 8:58 pm ET

How old was Bill Clinton when he ran for President? 46. Hillary has exactly 6 years more Senate experience than Barack but Barack has held elective office a lot longer than Hillary. If you want to count First Lady experience, then the Clinton's should open the files locked away in the Clinton Presidential library to see what advice she gave her husband as Co_President. Enough of this Bush/Clinton trade off.

Bill Mavity   January 21st, 2008 8:58 pm ET

Shame, shame shame. Wolf Blitzer's failure to stay in control and give John Edwards a fair chance to talk to the voters of South Carolina is disgraceful.

marie SC   January 21st, 2008 8:57 pm ET

Edwards makes the most sense and has real answers to the problems we face.
I LOVE the fact that Edwards called out Baracka and Hillary on their ties to the insurance and drug industries.

john   January 21st, 2008 8:57 pm ET

hilary and obama are both qualified to be presidents, but only one has to be elected. i think obama should give way to hillary and be the vice president. when the term of hillary ends, then he is nw ready to assumed the presidency and he can learn much from pres. hillary

Kirk   January 21st, 2008 8:56 pm ET

I have not seen Obama answer a Direct question yet or admit mistakes and the again I didnt care of Hillary but would vote for her now
the gloves needed to come off and a woman stood right up there which makes her presedential

K. Dongo   January 21st, 2008 8:56 pm ET

Not the kind of heat I am looking for... let's get back and STAY on the issues!

Karen   January 21st, 2008 8:56 pm ET

Why isn't Wolf controling this debate? The first half hour has been a waste. The Clintons feel this presidency is owed to Hillary. I was uncommitted until the Clintons began playing their dirty tricks. I will vote for Barack Obama on Feb 5th. My next choice is John Edwards.

Bruce   January 21st, 2008 8:56 pm ET

Obama is right we have limited resources and the question is "how are we going to get it done". None of them liked the Bush tax cut but a rebate is an additional tax cut when they will also try to fund healthcare for all (except illegal), mortgage reform to save people that couldn't qualify for a conforming loan in the first place. Maybe we get the money out of all the funds given to their campaigns.

Elhadji   January 21st, 2008 8:56 pm ET

The personal records of candidates does nothing but to help voters make a decision. This is showing the true face of politicians

Roger   January 21st, 2008 8:55 pm ET

This is the first time in my life that I have faced such a struggle to figure out whom to vote for president. I have been a life long democrat. I am at the point that I will vote for the first candidate that seems to have a plan, a spine and is not a lying crook.

K   January 21st, 2008 8:55 pm ET

who should should be the next president looking at this debate? I know my answer!!

JAZ   January 21st, 2008 8:55 pm ET

CNN is NOT NUETRAL in this debate – moderators keep deleting pro-Clinton comments.

maithland   January 21st, 2008 8:54 pm ET

Edwards' earlier comment – the rich getting richer? Hey he should know from first hand experience

cdsw   January 21st, 2008 8:54 pm ET

I agree with the prior post, the moderator certainly needs to gain better control. While this would not be my first time vpoting for a Republican, I agree with Mr. Walalce Brown, if Hillary wins the Democratic nomination, I am going to the other side.

josh   January 21st, 2008 8:54 pm ET

Hillary's record speaks for itself – she is an agent of change and has the right to point out Obama's record, as everyone else seems to think he is untouchable or cannot be called out on issues that he flip flops on. GO HILLARY!!!! Giv'em Hell!

Kimberly   January 21st, 2008 8:54 pm ET

While I appreciate Hillary's approach to universal healthcare, as an African-american woman, I would have liked to see her speak to some specific issues that affect me and those like me...especially if she wants our vote. The advancement of medicine has uncovered race-based correlations to disease management and treatment. She seemed to miss that opportunity for my vote and many others.

Shawn   January 21st, 2008 8:53 pm ET

Go Hillary ! Go !

Don't give a inch to anyone.

anderson, savoy, il   January 21st, 2008 8:53 pm ET

Whether or not it's good for anyone's campaign, it's definitely more enjoyable than the hugging match in Nevada.

Kevin   January 21st, 2008 8:53 pm ET

Clinton... notice i said Clinton and not Hillary because Bill is running through her... needs to get to the point and not take all of her time attacking OBAMA!!! She is causing everyone to get off of track and it is really making me mad.

M Miranda   January 21st, 2008 8:53 pm ET

This guy OBAMA think he is all that!!! What experience does he has? One term Senate? Hillary already led the White House.
Senator Edwards does care more for the working class but not strong enough to be Commander in Chief in these trouble times. But so far I thin he is better the Obama and Clinton and the media have not given him a fair coverage.

Universal Health care is a SOCIALIST IDEA = It will not work and we are in great deficit – which means higher taxes

gary   January 21st, 2008 8:52 pm ET

Hillary proved tonight in her vicious attacks on Barack why we should CLOSE THE BOOK on the Clinton dynasty. Time to relegate her and her hard knocking husband to the history books. If the Dems nominate Hillary we will go down in flames. I do not know whether Obama can win but am certain Hillary will lose. I signed up today for Barck, wrote a check and volunteered. Let's elect him.

Big B   January 21st, 2008 8:52 pm ET

I'm a military member, so if you have a family member in the military and support the military AT ALL you WILL NOT vote for another clinton...

Bein Careful   January 21st, 2008 8:52 pm ET

No thanks, Hillary. I do not need and I do not want your health care plan. Anyone who goes to a hospital emergency room right now has health care. Yours will be way too expensive.

mike   January 21st, 2008 8:52 pm ET

John Edwards asked a good question about Obama's votes in Illinois. He did not give an answer that made any sense.

maithland   January 21st, 2008 8:51 pm ET

Christine, good comment. I agree.

John L   January 21st, 2008 8:51 pm ET

Kimberly==== I agree with you Edwards is winning here.

clc   January 21st, 2008 8:51 pm ET

We should remember how hard it must be to take criticism in this forum . . . under duress, on television, and with very high stakes . . . while I have my preferences for a candidate (Go Obama!), I admire and respect all of the candidates for their willingness to participate in this type of forum on many different occasions! Democrats unite!

michelle   January 21st, 2008 8:51 pm ET

obama cannot stay on issue. edwards may be irrelevant but he's the best candidate so far... Hillary is strong...at least she can discuss the issues.

Elaine MA   January 21st, 2008 8:50 pm ET

GOOD JOB DEFENDING YOURSELF...SEN. CLINTON....CNN ALLOW SEN.CLINTON TIME TO FINISH HER COMMENTS....OBAMA PUTING LOUSY SPIN ON DEBATE.....WAISTING SEN. CLINTON'S TIME TO INFORM THE AMERICAN PEOPLE OF HER PLAN WHEN SHE IS PRESIDENT OF OUR COUNTRY.

Ron C   January 21st, 2008 8:50 pm ET

She isn't in that much trouble. The ramifications of President Clinton's remarks this past week have been positive for Hillary's campaign. Negativity works in this campaign, people perk up an pay attention to dramatic/ controversial situations.

Elaine MA   January 21st, 2008 8:50 pm ET

GOOD JOB DEFENDING YOURSELF...SEN. CLINTON....CNN ALLOW SEN.CLINTON TIME TO FINISH HER COMMENTS....OBAMA PUTING LOUSY SPIN ON DEBATE.....WASTING SEN. CLINTON'S TIME TO INFORM THE AMERICAN PEOPLE OF HER PLAN WHEN SHE IS PRESIDENT OF OUR COUNTRY.

Josh   January 21st, 2008 8:49 pm ET

NO the status quo is partisan politics where nothing gets done in Washington...

Yes, republicans are in the white house, but democrats are in Congress...

the status quo = hillary clinton....

Big B   January 21st, 2008 8:49 pm ET

Woe be to this nation of the evil Hillary wins. Can I renounce my citizenship?

Bein Careful   January 21st, 2008 8:49 pm ET

The Clintons are trash and need to be thrown out. She has no plan as some of you are saying that she does and her husband sees himself getting a third term.
Is it time for her to cry yet?

osahar   January 21st, 2008 8:49 pm ET

Paul, I agree. John Edwards has lowered his debate tactics to an impodent attempt to be relevant tonight. Edwards should take this opportunity to bow out gracefully.

vonna   January 21st, 2008 8:49 pm ET

do we really want a president whose middle name is hussien?

Mike   January 21st, 2008 8:48 pm ET

I'm tired of the clinton mudlinging – get to the issues. Wolf NEEDs to get control. They are ruining themselves up there rather than focus on a solid debate about the issues. We HAVE to have a Dem president in office...

christine malloy   January 21st, 2008 8:48 pm ET

What amazes me is the free ride the media has been giving Obama. Obama in his Senator days at the state level voted 100plus times present!!!! So he wasn't offending either side. The media says nothing when Hillary is ripped apart to her toenails but boo hoo when someone attackd Obama. Senator Kennedy called for Bill to stop bothering Obama. Why didn't the media stop Obama,s snear when he talked about Hillary's "likeability" . The media is giving him a free ride!!! You guys just want to see OBama as president. get with it. he is "W" reincarnated in Democratic. He is a woos!!!! Glad to hear Senator Clinton finally bring it up!!!! Yea John Edwards to bring Obama's no votes up. He has had afree ride. Examine him like you do any candidate!!!! Not just because he is a black superstar. How about his cocaine use. Dhaaa!!! Chris Malloy

Kimberly   January 21st, 2008 8:48 pm ET

Edwards is really winning this one thus far. He seems to fairly debate, and not mudsling...

maithland   January 21st, 2008 8:48 pm ET

Obama – obama we want no obamas today. There is no substance to his arguments, as a matter of fact he comes across very whiny.

K   January 21st, 2008 8:47 pm ET

Barack is clearly just trying to win votes by gaining political shots. He was wrong to even start to get that heated. This debate is about the issues not Barack Hussain Obama. He knows that he does not have the experience to deliver the type of change he speaks about so often.

jkbowman   January 21st, 2008 8:47 pm ET

I am a long standing Democrat. If Hillary is our candidate I plan to simply sit out the vote. She voted for Iraq, she voted for the Patriot Act, my god she even voted for Lieberman-Kyle. – For the life of me, outside of voting for gender or for the memory of Bill Clinton, I cannot see why a Democrat would support her.

clc   January 21st, 2008 8:47 pm ET

I am a white woman pushing 50 and if she is the Democratic nominee, I will throw my vote somewhere else.

paul   January 21st, 2008 8:47 pm ET

john edwards has become irrelevant in this race. i'm not particularly enamored with his thought that we should raise the cap on the social security tax. last i lokked...it was not an income tax.

Auburn   January 21st, 2008 8:47 pm ET

why cannot the candidates address the issues, economics, jobs, instead of attacking each other. Hillary, be above the rest and get Bill to chill out.

mike   January 21st, 2008 8:46 pm ET

Obama likes to give it out but can't seem to take the criticism back

Bruce   January 21st, 2008 8:46 pm ET

John is right we need to get good financial education to everyone including the poor. But. we need to start with Obama and Hillary because neither of them get it.

John L   January 21st, 2008 8:46 pm ET

Eric-–Regardless of who started it, the one who did not started should have been the adult and refocus to the issues that matter.

Barbara   January 21st, 2008 8:46 pm ET

I think Hillary looks like a desperate liar. She and Bill do nothing but unfairly attack their opponents. She twists and lies about everything. I feel for Obama that he is in a position to defend himself against her twisted half truths.

John   January 21st, 2008 8:46 pm ET

Clinton is coming off as a "same old political dirty tricks" politician

BlueOkie   January 21st, 2008 8:46 pm ET

Bein Careful January 21, 2008 8:44 pm ET

These debates do not matter as the dem will not win in November anyway. Hillary will stand no chance at all and Obama very little.

Obviously doesn't seem to live in the this world!

Anthony   January 21st, 2008 8:46 pm ET

Yeah, Edwards took the high road. Too bad no one is voting for him...

Ryan   January 21st, 2008 8:46 pm ET

Clinton and Obama are openning the perfect opportunity for John Edwards to sneak in and steal some votes away from them. This squabbling isn't going to get them anywhere.

NC   January 21st, 2008 8:45 pm ET

She was a Board Member at Wal-Mart, 1985-1992, also a Board Member, TCBY Yogurt Company, 1985-1992. That is hardly 'one-time' -- nonetheless, 2/3 are not looking too presidential. Bad advice from the behind the scenes handlers for this folks. Too bad for the Dems.

michelle   January 21st, 2008 8:45 pm ET

Obama is going down quick in showing his lack of knowledge...Clinton is doing a great job defending herself, but Edwards is def taking the high road. Go edwards.

Eric   January 21st, 2008 8:45 pm ET

Exactly Joe, its so easy to damage Hillary calling her the status quo, but take a look around, this isnt Clinton country, and it hasnt been since the 90s. Republicans are te status quo, and Barack is doing anything he can to damage her and become elected.

r0an   January 21st, 2008 8:45 pm ET

Obama and Hillary are like small children...this is a debate to be the President of the United States....come on...get a grip...Edwards is being smart stayin out of this...he will come out on top...

joe   January 21st, 2008 8:45 pm ET

It's time the ugly campaign the hypocritical Clintons are running came out in this primary race...it's out now in Myrtle Beach....An Edwards-Obama or Obama-Edwards Ticket is beginng to look pretty good to this Democrat!

osahar   January 21st, 2008 8:45 pm ET

Steve, I agree with you. Wolf needs to redirect the discussion back to the economy. Someone should throw the towel in and stop this brawl.

radiodon   January 21st, 2008 8:45 pm ET

For once we have candidates reacting to real issues affecting Americans at a time when we need this information most. The economy is the ONLY issue today (just wait until the market opens tomorow...) and how the candidates might deal with this is vital to know. Let them argue if they wish... it's the best way for us to know who they really are, what they want and what they actually stand for.

Paul, Atlanta   January 21st, 2008 8:44 pm ET

Wallace: You being Black male don't like Hillary Clinton and your fellow black male Barrack Obama justified this by calling Hillary that she's likable enough. That is the power of all black males to degrade women in their life? There is nothing wrong in voting for a women and there is nothing wrong with Hillary. She stood by her husband even when she knew he was wrong and that is the compromise of marraige which none of the American, black or white are making nowadays.

Karen   January 21st, 2008 8:44 pm ET

Obama is not ready to back up his record!!!!! We all make mistakes. He needs to know how to admit when he is wrong. Who wants a leader who thinks he is right all the time. Isnt that what we have now. Hillary has my vote!!!!

Cici   January 21st, 2008 8:44 pm ET

Let's not turn this into a race issue, please.

Tiffany   January 21st, 2008 8:44 pm ET

Why does Hillary always try to attack Obama? She can not be trusted.

Bein Careful   January 21st, 2008 8:44 pm ET

These debates do not matter as the dem will not win in November anyway. Hillary will stand no chance at all and Obama very little.

Moises Miranda   January 21st, 2008 8:44 pm ET

As an Independent voter, I am sick and tired of Politician pointing finger at each other and questioning the intelligence of the American people. I will not vote for Clinton or Obama if are nominated for President – I can not trust non of them.
Edwards should go as an Independent moderate candidate and get off the Democrat Party. Anyone can access the Sen CLinton and Sen Obama voting record for the truth.

Right now the World present a lot of danger and we need an experience and strong President to quickly resolve the Iraq situation and bring troops to protect our borders...right now I am leaning to McCain more

EricNAtl   January 21st, 2008 8:44 pm ET

Finally, someone brings all of Obama's "present" vote in the Illinois senate. BAM!!!

Kimberly   January 21st, 2008 8:44 pm ET

It's going to be very difficult for any of these candidates to stay with the big picture without defending each other's individual choices and votes. This debate has been great thus far, but I hope this debate doesn't become a match of sound-bites and one-liners. Hopefully each will take a higher road and stick to the issues of the people.

Sylvia   January 21st, 2008 8:44 pm ET

oh great now Obama is trying to turn to Edwards for help!!!

Steve   January 21st, 2008 8:43 pm ET

This debate is all BS. The Asian markets have dropped 11% in the last 17 hours. The euro markets are following suit. Dow will open $600 lower tomorrow. And what are these idiot debating? Your turn.

oscar   January 21st, 2008 8:43 pm ET

I'm so sick of whiny Barack. He needs to grow up and stop being so whiny. Beyond that, he needs to start talking about the issues. So far, all he does is do his inspirational speech. Put some info in Barack. Go Hillary!

boynla, LA, CA   January 21st, 2008 8:43 pm ET

and by the way, when it comes to the issues, she's clearly superior to both obama and edwards. she knows challenges and has the policies to solve them. all john ever says is his dad was a mill worker, and obama preaches hope. hillary's the one with the answers!!!!

Kevin,FL   January 21st, 2008 8:43 pm ET

LOL Edwards is like the extra Light weight in a Super Heavy Weight Fight.. when all this is done.. it will be a Clinton/Obama Ticket.. because on Feb 5th Clinton will pick up most to almost all of the states needed to get the nomination..

Joe   January 21st, 2008 8:43 pm ET

Josh, don't compare Hillary with status quo. Status quo right now is Republican. Oh the slippery slope you Barack-ites travel.

ebp   January 21st, 2008 8:43 pm ET

Obama is having to run against both Hillary and Bill. Billary can dish it out but when Obama stands up to them, they act like he started it. Billary is reminding us of their philosophy of winning at any cost.

Eric   January 21st, 2008 8:42 pm ET

Thats true John L, not very presidential at all. Neither one of them, but who started it?

Katie   January 21st, 2008 8:42 pm ET

HIllary needs to let go of Barack's "bad" stuff and get back on to what she wants to do for this country.

I'm TIRED of this ping-pong of attacks and slurs.

Katie

Mark Melcher   January 21st, 2008 8:42 pm ET

You're absolutely right Bill. John Edwards came across as the more presidential. It appears Hillary and Barack are shooting each other in the feet.

Alan   January 21st, 2008 8:42 pm ET

What does Wallace's comment have to do with this thread?

Patricia   January 21st, 2008 8:41 pm ET

Edwards is the ADULT. Hillary and Barak are acting like children in a sandbox. Edwards DESERVES to be President. I'm sick and tired of mudslinging.

osahar   January 21st, 2008 8:41 pm ET

Democrats need to remain mindful that they want to win the White House back. The candidates should stop throwing charges at each other.

John L   January 21st, 2008 8:41 pm ET

Hillary and Obama didn't look presidential during the argument. That was just unprofessional from the both of them to continue wasting time talking about personal attacks. Our country still has problems, and there they were, not talking about them. Thank, John Edwards for talking about our concerns.

JMA   January 21st, 2008 8:41 pm ET

She is in deep trouble.

Josh   January 21st, 2008 8:41 pm ET

Barack is the only one that answers any question with the truth...

Hillary is a prototypical politician...She is "old" Washington...

If you're happy with the status quo, then vote for Hillary...

boynla, LA, CA   January 21st, 2008 8:41 pm ET

Go Hillary. If he's going to hit ruthlessly, she's gotta hit back. he's a rookie trying to play in the show, and he just can't hang!

Chris   January 21st, 2008 8:40 pm ET

Bill, I think your right. Senator's Clinton and Obama are allowing John Edwards to carry the debate by addressing the issues and not slum lords and Wal-Mart. i don't even like Sen. Edwards but he's looking the best. I think he has been on TV for 8 very good minutes.

Joe   January 21st, 2008 8:40 pm ET

I love the fact that you try to earn sympathy for Obama by using words like lynching and racist.

You fail.

Marty   January 21st, 2008 8:40 pm ET

Hillary is making Obama look worse than ever. She is the leader here. Edwards is out of the race and he is bitter about that.

gg   January 21st, 2008 8:40 pm ET

Yes Edwards did come off well. And noone has mentioned that she was on the Board of 2 European banks in the 80's Clinton.

Eric   January 21st, 2008 8:40 pm ET

Obama keeps attacking Hillary and ignores the issue, he needs to take a few lessons from Edwards on how sticking to the issues is what America wants. Not political bickering.

Robert OH   January 21st, 2008 8:39 pm ET

Who is going to take the first sucker punch?

M B   January 21st, 2008 8:39 pm ET

Again, isn't this a debate between 3 candidates? Obama does nothing but attack Hillary, and neither Obama or Hillary are even giving Edwards consideration.

Jason   January 21st, 2008 8:39 pm ET

Wow, Edwards is amazing right now...when he gets a chance to talk.

Duop Chak, Colorado Springs, CO   January 21st, 2008 8:39 pm ET

This ill-practice heated debate is making people sick. Reality must come first.

Chris, Orlando FL   January 21st, 2008 8:39 pm ET

Obama dealt it and set the tone for the debate. Hillary had no choice but to respond. YOU GO GIRL.

Sylvia   January 21st, 2008 8:39 pm ET

HILLARY rocks....Obama cries a lot but can't take the heat...SO GET OUT OF THE KITCHEN!!!!!

Lees   January 21st, 2008 8:39 pm ET

It's about time they all took the gloves off rather than sending their surrogates in for them. Obama can either stand the heat – or not.

Brian   January 21st, 2008 8:39 pm ET

When the 3rd candidate doesn't get involved in fights like this, he gets more points/votes.

johnatkins   January 21st, 2008 8:39 pm ET

This is kind of debate we have been waiting for. It shows the Clintons for who they are. Powerhungy policticians who will do anything to get elected.

maithland   January 21st, 2008 8:38 pm ET

Hey why bring up her "one time corporate tie to Wal-Mart" – she had every right to defend herself.

Alan   January 21st, 2008 8:38 pm ET

So the heated debate benefits neither of the participants, but a third party. Very funny.

mrtrate   January 21st, 2008 8:38 pm ET

Lets call the truth out..I think that Obama did an excellent job pointing out Clinton's past...this is gooood

Joe   January 21st, 2008 8:38 pm ET

edwards just wanted some attention. he'd react the same way if he was popular enough to be criticized.

Wallace Brown   January 21st, 2008 8:37 pm ET

I am a Black male in my mid-fifties who has always voted for a Democrat for President but if Hillary Clinton wins the Democratic nomination I will vote for a Republican for the first time in my life. If a Republican did what the Clintons have been doing – character assassination, mud-slingling, lying, and disaparaging Barack Obama my people would call them racists and be 100% correct. Why is it that the holier than thou Clintons get away with a hi-tech lynching of Obama and there is silence in our community???? I do not worship at the altar of Bill Clinton and what he and his henchman working for Hillary are doing is despicable and it's high time Black leaders stop being silent about it.

Eric   January 21st, 2008 8:37 pm ET

Go Hillary, she had ever right to defend herself. Obama opened the door, she just walked in and reminded him of his own roots.

Joe   January 21st, 2008 8:37 pm ET

I want a slum lord president.......(end sarcasm)

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room. Download this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

twitter
@wolfblitzercnn: Trifecta -- NOT. My Redskins, Bills and Packers all lose this weekend. Very sad.
Updated: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:40:09 -0800
@HornickCNN: RT @andersoncooper: Interactive: The top 10 Health-Care-Reform Players http://bit.ly/6C3OlX
Updated: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:47:50 -0800
@HornickCNN: RT @cnn_oppmann: CNN.com: Mexico City approves same-sex marriage. http://bit.ly/5RyMnk #mexico
Updated: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:46:26 -0800
@HornickCNN: Rudy's reportedly not running for NY SEN or Gov ...
Updated: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:43:48 -0800
@wolfblitzercnn: Redskins-Giants always exciting. Both teams have a lot to prove. And Giants can still salvage playoffs. Skins just need a win.
Updated: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:19:36 -0800
Categories
Powered by WordPress.com VIP