<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Women&#039;s group slams Kennedy for &#039;betrayal&#039;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/</link>
	<description>All politics, all the time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:07:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: karen</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-435103</link>
		<dc:creator>karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 20:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-435103</guid>
		<description>GOOD FOR YOU, NOW!!!  Kenndy is clearly the bloated alcoholic creep he always has been.  Chapaquitik, anyone?  Left a woman to drown to death, and got off scott free.  He should probably be getting out of jail right about now if anyone had cared about justice back then for a  blank, blank, blank.  And then Willie Smith.  Rapist in the clan and Teddy-boy backs him and gets him off scott free?  Kennedys?  Who gives a blank.  Good for the New York chapter for saying it as it is.  He&#039;s a mysoginist through and through.  It&#039;s easier for white entitled men to back a black man because of the obvious issue of race inequality, harder for them to back a woman because of entrenched sexism within themselves.  Don&#039;t back off NY NOW.  Your sisters in the national administration of NOW are clearly cowering- don&#039;t want to piss off a Kennedy,eh?  Gutless wonders ladies.  Go NY!!!!  Real feminists, i.e. real women and real men judge a candidate and other political figures on performance, not on media hype.  Hillary is the best candidate- that is quite obvious to anyone with a modicum of sense.  I worked in the senate as an intern and I can tell you no one who knows Ted Kennedy is in awe of him.  He&#039;s just a nasty old white man.  Why throw him undue respect?
As for Carolyn Kennedy, what has she ever done and who is she to even judge her father&#039;s legacy when she was a tiny kid when he died?  Other Kennedys, 3 in fact, and one an actual environmentalist, have backed Hillary.  Bark Obama
has said he won&#039;t be entrenched in Washington politics, Washington games and then he goes and picks up the grand daddy player of them all?  What?  Hypocrisy at its finest.  He acts old school to any savvy observer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GOOD FOR YOU, NOW!!!  Kenndy is clearly the bloated alcoholic creep he always has been.  Chapaquitik, anyone?  Left a woman to drown to death, and got off scott free.  He should probably be getting out of jail right about now if anyone had cared about justice back then for a  blank, blank, blank.  And then Willie Smith.  Rapist in the clan and Teddy-boy backs him and gets him off scott free?  Kennedys?  Who gives a blank.  Good for the New York chapter for saying it as it is.  He's a mysoginist through and through.  It's easier for white entitled men to back a black man because of the obvious issue of race inequality, harder for them to back a woman because of entrenched sexism within themselves.  Don't back off NY NOW.  Your sisters in the national administration of NOW are clearly cowering- don't want to piss off a Kennedy,eh?  Gutless wonders ladies.  Go NY!!!!  Real feminists, i.e. real women and real men judge a candidate and other political figures on performance, not on media hype.  Hillary is the best candidate- that is quite obvious to anyone with a modicum of sense.  I worked in the senate as an intern and I can tell you no one who knows Ted Kennedy is in awe of him.  He's just a nasty old white man.  Why throw him undue respect?<br />
As for Carolyn Kennedy, what has she ever done and who is she to even judge her father's legacy when she was a tiny kid when he died?  Other Kennedys, 3 in fact, and one an actual environmentalist, have backed Hillary.  Bark Obama<br />
has said he won't be entrenched in Washington politics, Washington games and then he goes and picks up the grand daddy player of them all?  What?  Hypocrisy at its finest.  He acts old school to any savvy observer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrs Tucker  in Ohio</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-401017</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrs Tucker  in Ohio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 18:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-401017</guid>
		<description>NOW should stop and think.  This election is not about gender it&#039;s about who is most qualified for the Presidency of the United States.  Come on ladies &quot;Get Over It&quot;.  
OBAMA is the Man best qualified to be the new CHANGE, HOPES and DREAMS of the ALL the American people and will  be ready for the Presidency on day ONE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NOW should stop and think.  This election is not about gender it's about who is most qualified for the Presidency of the United States.  Come on ladies "Get Over It".<br />
OBAMA is the Man best qualified to be the new CHANGE, HOPES and DREAMS of the ALL the American people and will  be ready for the Presidency on day ONE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-367301</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 03:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-367301</guid>
		<description>These NOW people are hilarious! I really love how they say &quot;Ted Kennedy was always a friend of NOW.&quot; Yeah, right, ask that woman in the car with at Chappaquiddick how friendly he was to women.

I swear, NOW and PETA keep showing how fringe and worthless they are. NOW is a disgrace to women and PETA is a disgrace to true animal lovers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These NOW people are hilarious! I really love how they say "Ted Kennedy was always a friend of NOW." Yeah, right, ask that woman in the car with at Chappaquiddick how friendly he was to women.</p>
<p>I swear, NOW and PETA keep showing how fringe and worthless they are. NOW is a disgrace to women and PETA is a disgrace to true animal lovers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: khefer</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-366876</link>
		<dc:creator>khefer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 02:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-366876</guid>
		<description>What was N.O.W.&#039;s reaction to Clinton having an extra-marital affair with his intern?

&quot;We have better things to worry about&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What was N.O.W.'s reaction to Clinton having an extra-marital affair with his intern?</p>
<p>"We have better things to worry about"</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-365018</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 22:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-365018</guid>
		<description>I tihnk this is crazy, it seems like Hilary can sling mud, and Obama doesnt shake her hand and he is being childish, ok so what about president Clinton, what is he doing...this unfair

Obama has my vote

OBAMA 2008

Atlanta, GA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tihnk this is crazy, it seems like Hilary can sling mud, and Obama doesnt shake her hand and he is being childish, ok so what about president Clinton, what is he doing...this unfair</p>
<p>Obama has my vote</p>
<p>OBAMA 2008</p>
<p>Atlanta, GA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chante</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-364998</link>
		<dc:creator>Chante</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 22:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-364998</guid>
		<description>Who said Ted did not want a woman president! OMG this is crazy, a black man, a white woman or a white man, or a latino woman, or asian, or mized, or everything can hold racist beliefs, being a white woman doesnt make you automatically open for change, the same thing holds for other ethic groups, it is the person!!!! so stop this sex and race baiting!!! please

OBAMA 2008
Los Angeles, CA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who said Ted did not want a woman president! OMG this is crazy, a black man, a white woman or a white man, or a latino woman, or asian, or mized, or everything can hold racist beliefs, being a white woman doesnt make you automatically open for change, the same thing holds for other ethic groups, it is the person!!!! so stop this sex and race baiting!!! please</p>
<p>OBAMA 2008<br />
Los Angeles, CA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M.Lewis</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-364944</link>
		<dc:creator>M.Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 22:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-364944</guid>
		<description>Well is now really about women or for rich privildged women? 

I am curious 

A Woman
M.Lewis
Los Angeles, CA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well is now really about women or for rich privildged women? </p>
<p>I am curious </p>
<p>A Woman<br />
M.Lewis<br />
Los Angeles, CA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: observer</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-364506</link>
		<dc:creator>observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 21:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-364506</guid>
		<description>Ted Kennedy should have kept his potato sack shut! Go HILLARY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ted Kennedy should have kept his potato sack shut! Go HILLARY</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sharon walker</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-364267</link>
		<dc:creator>sharon walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 21:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-364267</guid>
		<description>Dear Friends:

Cells for the arm and leg or hand and foot growth.   Please think in terms of several things.
1.   Frogs and amphimbian have the ability to grow back their arms and legs. 
      This science and medicine has been trying to do for centuries and or figure out. 
2.  The male sperm are not like the female egg.  The egg so many and they form at a certain ages.   The male form thoughout most of their life.   The woman uterus forms moist cells that flow and from the walls of her.  This allows the transfer of hormones and nuriousment and energy into the area and wall of the uterous.   The male like the female has this but it takes all the cell, dna, gernones and teledones ( check it out in the Saramento Bee ) for accuracy in spelling ) are and enable the male to have his cells fromed in the active and live sperm. 

3.  Cells move to the surface of the skin. Through the connective tissue and the involuntary  organ and  skin cells.      In this a full organ mico of the entire body essentially.    Unlike the skin cells the waste material leaves mostly flued through the urine and stool.        Yet science can take cells from the skin and make or clone a human and or mammal.  In otherwords the skin cells have all the nourishment and cells life dehydrated or not in them.   

4.  Does the organs?   Can cells of say the eye replicate the entire body or are they just that organ?  

5.  Muscles they can grow,  skin they can grow,  but say the right and left arm or leg they have not yet they can stimulate and mend a leg by putting it together and then slow excercise or stimulation.    Cells should match or scaring and or elongated cells. 

6.  The brain connects the blood and nervous system.   Can you create a human or clone of a mammal from blood cells and or nerve endings alone?    Why not.  They are the souce that moves the energy through and feeds and restores.  That then to into the waste system.  Can you grow a clone from stool and or liver or kidney.  

7 .  Selection of dna and molecular to then choose the organ and the direction. 

8.  The bone         If you look at a chicken they have bone and their legs have none, yet they can carry the large body.  A bird no hips or legs for flight.  The tissue similar to man or mammal is cartalege.    The transfer and change of chemistry selection to form bone.          Knowing the combination and order is part of the key to growing these.  and timing.  Timing in the find as in the School in Briton will be the key to life cells and regrowth.     Are they using nanotechnology and does this burn or wear down the life of the teledrone or reproductive ability? 

9.  Science can watch and distort the growth of arms and legs as in Thalidamyde drugs impact.  In otherwards by breaking down what is in this drug and watching where it goes one can see which dna is for the arms and legs right and or left. 

10.  The life of a spern is how long.  So is the life then within and the nourishment and explosive hormones needed to ignite the growth into the cell division.   

More to follow I am tired and some unscupulous persons are trying to get my thoughts first. 
Just as the cell starts the first division it already has all you need from the same person you would have less rejection.  The speed of cell growth.

Sharon M Walker</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Friends:</p>
<p>Cells for the arm and leg or hand and foot growth.   Please think in terms of several things.<br />
1.   Frogs and amphimbian have the ability to grow back their arms and legs.<br />
      This science and medicine has been trying to do for centuries and or figure out.<br />
2.  The male sperm are not like the female egg.  The egg so many and they form at a certain ages.   The male form thoughout most of their life.   The woman uterus forms moist cells that flow and from the walls of her.  This allows the transfer of hormones and nuriousment and energy into the area and wall of the uterous.   The male like the female has this but it takes all the cell, dna, gernones and teledones ( check it out in the Saramento Bee ) for accuracy in spelling ) are and enable the male to have his cells fromed in the active and live sperm. </p>
<p>3.  Cells move to the surface of the skin. Through the connective tissue and the involuntary  organ and  skin cells.      In this a full organ mico of the entire body essentially.    Unlike the skin cells the waste material leaves mostly flued through the urine and stool.        Yet science can take cells from the skin and make or clone a human and or mammal.  In otherwords the skin cells have all the nourishment and cells life dehydrated or not in them.   </p>
<p>4.  Does the organs?   Can cells of say the eye replicate the entire body or are they just that organ?  </p>
<p>5.  Muscles they can grow,  skin they can grow,  but say the right and left arm or leg they have not yet they can stimulate and mend a leg by putting it together and then slow excercise or stimulation.    Cells should match or scaring and or elongated cells. </p>
<p>6.  The brain connects the blood and nervous system.   Can you create a human or clone of a mammal from blood cells and or nerve endings alone?    Why not.  They are the souce that moves the energy through and feeds and restores.  That then to into the waste system.  Can you grow a clone from stool and or liver or kidney.  </p>
<p>7 .  Selection of dna and molecular to then choose the organ and the direction. </p>
<p>8.  The bone         If you look at a chicken they have bone and their legs have none, yet they can carry the large body.  A bird no hips or legs for flight.  The tissue similar to man or mammal is cartalege.    The transfer and change of chemistry selection to form bone.          Knowing the combination and order is part of the key to growing these.  and timing.  Timing in the find as in the School in Briton will be the key to life cells and regrowth.     Are they using nanotechnology and does this burn or wear down the life of the teledrone or reproductive ability? </p>
<p>9.  Science can watch and distort the growth of arms and legs as in Thalidamyde drugs impact.  In otherwards by breaking down what is in this drug and watching where it goes one can see which dna is for the arms and legs right and or left. </p>
<p>10.  The life of a spern is how long.  So is the life then within and the nourishment and explosive hormones needed to ignite the growth into the cell division.   </p>
<p>More to follow I am tired and some unscupulous persons are trying to get my thoughts first.<br />
Just as the cell starts the first division it already has all you need from the same person you would have less rejection.  The speed of cell growth.</p>
<p>Sharon M Walker</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bush2008</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-364184</link>
		<dc:creator>Bush2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 21:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-364184</guid>
		<description>LOL! how come they don&#039;t say anything about Caroline Kennedy also supporting Obama?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL! how come they don't say anything about Caroline Kennedy also supporting Obama?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RealityKing</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-364168</link>
		<dc:creator>RealityKing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 21:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-364168</guid>
		<description>If you don&#039;t support Hillary, 
you don&#039;t support standing by a lying, two timing, double dealing, cheating husband..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you don't support Hillary,<br />
you don't support standing by a lying, two timing, double dealing, cheating husband..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elaine</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-364105</link>
		<dc:creator>elaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 20:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-364105</guid>
		<description>Man or woman, does our vote really count anyway? Apparently, only a select few elect our president, so why do we have the priviledge to vote? I don&#039;t get it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man or woman, does our vote really count anyway? Apparently, only a select few elect our president, so why do we have the priviledge to vote? I don't get it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pam Eugene OR</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-364004</link>
		<dc:creator>pam Eugene OR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 20:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-364004</guid>
		<description>I would love to vote for a woman. I would never vote for Hillary. Not a snowballs chance in hell.
Obama 08 Truth &amp; Honor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to vote for a woman. I would never vote for Hillary. Not a snowballs chance in hell.<br />
Obama 08 Truth &amp; Honor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fisher</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-363993</link>
		<dc:creator>Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 20:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-363993</guid>
		<description>Mr. Bloomberg&#039;s support goes beyond New York. Jon Fisher, a 35-year-old technology entrepreneur in Tiburon, Calif., said Mr. Bloomberg&#039;s background appeals to him. &quot;Business experience, and specifically this kind of entrepreneurial business experience, is exactly the skill set we need in a president,&quot; said Mr. Fisher, who sold his most recent venture, Bharosa, to technology giant Oracle Corp. last year.

Mr. Fisher, a Democrat, is inviting others who have sold companies to Oracle to a meeting in Tiburon at the end of the month. The goal, Mr. Fisher said, is to recruit people willing to dedicate time and effort to a Bloomberg campaign. (Mr. Bloomberg would presumably fund his campaign himself, making fund-raising unnecessary.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Bloomberg's support goes beyond New York. Jon Fisher, a 35-year-old technology entrepreneur in Tiburon, Calif., said Mr. Bloomberg's background appeals to him. "Business experience, and specifically this kind of entrepreneurial business experience, is exactly the skill set we need in a president," said Mr. Fisher, who sold his most recent venture, Bharosa, to technology giant Oracle Corp. last year.</p>
<p>Mr. Fisher, a Democrat, is inviting others who have sold companies to Oracle to a meeting in Tiburon at the end of the month. The goal, Mr. Fisher said, is to recruit people willing to dedicate time and effort to a Bloomberg campaign. (Mr. Bloomberg would presumably fund his campaign himself, making fund-raising unnecessary.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-363684</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 20:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-363684</guid>
		<description>The fact is, this just makes that chapter of NOW look like close-minded whiners. I whole-heartedly agree that you can&#039;t choose a candidate just because she&#039;s a woman or he&#039;s black. that&#039;s what obama&#039;s been saying for awhile now, but the clintons are trying to make this a black vs. white campaign. this could set back race relations by a couple decades if they keep this up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact is, this just makes that chapter of NOW look like close-minded whiners. I whole-heartedly agree that you can't choose a candidate just because she's a woman or he's black. that's what obama's been saying for awhile now, but the clintons are trying to make this a black vs. white campaign. this could set back race relations by a couple decades if they keep this up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-363568</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 19:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-363568</guid>
		<description>White, 40 yr old, Registered Republican Female voting for Barak Obama!

O8ama</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>White, 40 yr old, Registered Republican Female voting for Barak Obama!</p>
<p>O8ama</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Babette</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-363496</link>
		<dc:creator>Babette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 19:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-363496</guid>
		<description>I am a Republican, and I am strongly leaning towards voting for Obama.  I think he truly wants to reunite the country, not just the Democratic party.  

I also am disgusted to think that anyone expects me to vote for Hillary Clinton just because she&#039;s a woman and I am, too.  I think she would further divide the country instead of focusing on what ALL Americans have in common.

I am not a Ted Kennedy fan, but I agree with what he said.  I also find it ironic and mean that someone dismissed Caroline Kennedy&#039;s support for Obama just because she has money and privilege.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a Republican, and I am strongly leaning towards voting for Obama.  I think he truly wants to reunite the country, not just the Democratic party.  </p>
<p>I also am disgusted to think that anyone expects me to vote for Hillary Clinton just because she's a woman and I am, too.  I think she would further divide the country instead of focusing on what ALL Americans have in common.</p>
<p>I am not a Ted Kennedy fan, but I agree with what he said.  I also find it ironic and mean that someone dismissed Caroline Kennedy's support for Obama just because she has money and privilege.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cal</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-363434</link>
		<dc:creator>Cal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 19:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-363434</guid>
		<description>If Ted Kennedy&#039;s endorsment of Obama means that he can&#039;t accept the idea of a woman as President, then by the same &quot;logic&quot; the NY chapter of NOW  can&#039;t accept the idea of a black President.

What&#039;s truly sexist? Endorsing a more qualified candidate who happens to be a man, or endorsing a less qualified one BECAUSE she&#039;s a woman?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Ted Kennedy's endorsment of Obama means that he can't accept the idea of a woman as President, then by the same "logic" the NY chapter of NOW  can't accept the idea of a black President.</p>
<p>What's truly sexist? Endorsing a more qualified candidate who happens to be a man, or endorsing a less qualified one BECAUSE she's a woman?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob PA.</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-363394</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob PA.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 19:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-363394</guid>
		<description>Kelly you hit the nail on the head</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kelly you hit the nail on the head</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Black Irish</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-363167</link>
		<dc:creator>Black Irish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 19:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-363167</guid>
		<description>The NOW rant is laughable and there is no way anyone can actually believe that Obama will not respect the goals or rights of women. If Ted kennedy has destroyed their hopes, they need to find a new mission. I respect both Clinton and Obama, but was very disturbed by Bill Clinton&#039;s ranting in SC, especially as it became all about him, (Hillary who?) Realistically, both Clinton and Obama face huge obstacles and some people will never vote for them because of their race /gender. On thing that gets lost in this whole argument about race/ gender is that Obama has abosolutely no Black American ancestry. All his American family are white and he was raised by them, yet he is only considered black. His perspective is somewhat different and his views and experiece are much more diverse. Does this mean he should only get the mixed race, foreign parent, hippie white mother votes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NOW rant is laughable and there is no way anyone can actually believe that Obama will not respect the goals or rights of women. If Ted kennedy has destroyed their hopes, they need to find a new mission. I respect both Clinton and Obama, but was very disturbed by Bill Clinton's ranting in SC, especially as it became all about him, (Hillary who?) Realistically, both Clinton and Obama face huge obstacles and some people will never vote for them because of their race /gender. On thing that gets lost in this whole argument about race/ gender is that Obama has abosolutely no Black American ancestry. All his American family are white and he was raised by them, yet he is only considered black. His perspective is somewhat different and his views and experiece are much more diverse. Does this mean he should only get the mixed race, foreign parent, hippie white mother votes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ticia</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-363032</link>
		<dc:creator>Ticia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-363032</guid>
		<description>Oh and I forgot one thing,

While everyone is fighting over Clinton and Obama, please remember John Edward&#039;s slogan: &quot;Objects in your mirror are closer than they appear!&quot; Don&#039;t count him out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and I forgot one thing,</p>
<p>While everyone is fighting over Clinton and Obama, please remember John Edward's slogan: "Objects in your mirror are closer than they appear!" Don't count him out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-363005</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-363005</guid>
		<description>NOW is wrong. A vote for Obama is not necessarily a vote against women!  I think it is unfair to say that Kennedy betrayed women. Please, media - don&#039;t give this anymore attention. It&#039;s not news-worthy, and only shows ignorance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NOW is wrong. A vote for Obama is not necessarily a vote against women!  I think it is unfair to say that Kennedy betrayed women. Please, media &#8211; don't give this anymore attention. It's not news-worthy, and only shows ignorance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas, St. Petersburg, FL</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-362891</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas, St. Petersburg, FL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-362891</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Senator Kennedy, for endorsing Obama. This will ensure that Independent voters will vote Republican in November. No one is more liberal than you, sir.

Evidently the amiable ties between the Kennedy and Clinton clans were not enough for Ted, Patrick, and Caroline Kennedy to endorse Hillary&#039;s presidential bid. With friends like the Kennedys, who needs enemies?

When the Clintons were involved in scandal after scandal over the years, liberal Democrats always blamed the &#039;Vast Right Wing Conspiracy&#039;. Now these very same people are finally seeing the Clintons through Republican eyes for the first time, and they expect to be taken seriously. The hypocrisy of liberal Democrats is absolutely staggering and unforgivable on this FACT.

While I am no fan of the Clintons, it is indisputable that both Bill and Hillary have always been an ally of minority and poor people in America. 

Therefore, when President Clinton recently compared Obama&#039;s presidential bid with that of Jesse Jackson in 1984 and 1988 and liberals feigned outrage and squealed &#039;racism&#039;, I couldn&#039;t help but ponder: Is this what political dissidents have to look forward to when they oppose President Obama? 

Thanks for the advanced warning. Hypersensitivity has no place within the political arena. As an American, I have the right to disagree with a politician without being labelled a &#039;racist&#039; for doing so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Senator Kennedy, for endorsing Obama. This will ensure that Independent voters will vote Republican in November. No one is more liberal than you, sir.</p>
<p>Evidently the amiable ties between the Kennedy and Clinton clans were not enough for Ted, Patrick, and Caroline Kennedy to endorse Hillary's presidential bid. With friends like the Kennedys, who needs enemies?</p>
<p>When the Clintons were involved in scandal after scandal over the years, liberal Democrats always blamed the 'Vast Right Wing Conspiracy'. Now these very same people are finally seeing the Clintons through Republican eyes for the first time, and they expect to be taken seriously. The hypocrisy of liberal Democrats is absolutely staggering and unforgivable on this FACT.</p>
<p>While I am no fan of the Clintons, it is indisputable that both Bill and Hillary have always been an ally of minority and poor people in America. </p>
<p>Therefore, when President Clinton recently compared Obama's presidential bid with that of Jesse Jackson in 1984 and 1988 and liberals feigned outrage and squealed 'racism', I couldn't help but ponder: Is this what political dissidents have to look forward to when they oppose President Obama? </p>
<p>Thanks for the advanced warning. Hypersensitivity has no place within the political arena. As an American, I have the right to disagree with a politician without being labelled a 'racist' for doing so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maynard</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-362850</link>
		<dc:creator>maynard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-362850</guid>
		<description>enough of the womans crap..  woman voted for bush   yes it was the womans vote that put that wit wit in office. and you see what the usa has today.  there has not
been a man of principle sense  JFK.   alone gives me the right to back obama.

he was twice a much on the ball as hillary does, she is not presidential material

AND I HOPE ALL WASHED UP IN POLITICS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>enough of the womans crap..  woman voted for bush   yes it was the womans vote that put that wit wit in office. and you see what the usa has today.  there has not<br />
been a man of principle sense  JFK.   alone gives me the right to back obama.</p>
<p>he was twice a much on the ball as hillary does, she is not presidential material</p>
<p>AND I HOPE ALL WASHED UP IN POLITICS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deb</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-362776</link>
		<dc:creator>deb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-362776</guid>
		<description>I am a black middle-aged woman, and I too am very disappointed in the Kennedys&#039;.    In the very beginning I was stricktly for Hillary, then within the last few days I started to sort of lean towards Obama.   UNTIL...this morning... I was watching Good Morning America,  when Diane Sawyers asked them if they notified the Clintons (because they were suppose to be friends) that they were going to turn their support to  Obama, and they seemed a lttle uncomfortable.  I started to think about what all I saw this morning... and now i am back to being a totally sturn Hillary (and Bill) Clinton supporter!  Thanks for making up my mind Kennedys!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a black middle-aged woman, and I too am very disappointed in the Kennedys'.    In the very beginning I was stricktly for Hillary, then within the last few days I started to sort of lean towards Obama.   UNTIL...this morning... I was watching Good Morning America,  when Diane Sawyers asked them if they notified the Clintons (because they were suppose to be friends) that they were going to turn their support to  Obama, and they seemed a lttle uncomfortable.  I started to think about what all I saw this morning... and now i am back to being a totally sturn Hillary (and Bill) Clinton supporter!  Thanks for making up my mind Kennedys!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pricha</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-362740</link>
		<dc:creator>Pricha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-362740</guid>
		<description>I think that the American people are smart enough to make their own decision to vote in November 2008. Don&#039;t let those endosements have any impact on your own decision. I voted for John Kerry and admired him and kept his campaign banner from the last election. But now he came out and endosed Obama and said that he&#039;s going to give all the e-mail addresses to Obama&#039;s camp. Now I want to let Mr. Kerry knows that I supported you at that time, but it does not mean that you own my name and address to force me to support Obama. Now I&#039;m going to burn those banner that I have kept for years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the American people are smart enough to make their own decision to vote in November 2008. Don't let those endosements have any impact on your own decision. I voted for John Kerry and admired him and kept his campaign banner from the last election. But now he came out and endosed Obama and said that he's going to give all the e-mail addresses to Obama's camp. Now I want to let Mr. Kerry knows that I supported you at that time, but it does not mean that you own my name and address to force me to support Obama. Now I'm going to burn those banner that I have kept for years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-362726</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-362726</guid>
		<description>Play fair people - CNN and alike - Why do you guys keep beating up Hillary - a person that has given her life to making the world better.    The problem is if a woman looks strong -- then she is mean, if she shows emotion she looks weak.  Do we ever  talk about this concerning a man.  It is true - woman have to be three times better then a man in all things they do to be accepted.
Woman wake up -- do not vote for Hillary because she is a woman, but do not vote for Obama because he is a black man and he makes us feel good.  Obama is just as much as an insider as Clinton.  He almost broke is neck yesterday at the State of the Union trying to shake President Bush&#039;s hand.  
The sad part of that is - Bush could have cared less.

Obama is a great speaker and makes us feels good and since we are a &quot;feel good&quot; country - we are voting with our heart and not our head.  Until Obama answers the questions he is ask and quits preaching to us. - I go with Clinton.  I do not need someone cool, I need someone effective.

PS : Who cares who Kennedy endorses. He doesn&#039;t pay my bills.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Play fair people &#8211; CNN and alike &#8211; Why do you guys keep beating up Hillary &#8211; a person that has given her life to making the world better.    The problem is if a woman looks strong - then she is mean, if she shows emotion she looks weak.  Do we ever  talk about this concerning a man.  It is true &#8211; woman have to be three times better then a man in all things they do to be accepted.<br />
Woman wake up - do not vote for Hillary because she is a woman, but do not vote for Obama because he is a black man and he makes us feel good.  Obama is just as much as an insider as Clinton.  He almost broke is neck yesterday at the State of the Union trying to shake President Bush's hand.<br />
The sad part of that is &#8211; Bush could have cared less.</p>
<p>Obama is a great speaker and makes us feels good and since we are a "feel good" country &#8211; we are voting with our heart and not our head.  Until Obama answers the questions he is ask and quits preaching to us. &#8211; I go with Clinton.  I do not need someone cool, I need someone effective.</p>
<p>PS : Who cares who Kennedy endorses. He doesn't pay my bills.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Bundy</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-362718</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Bundy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-362718</guid>
		<description>PEN,  I totally agree with you. It wish everyone would see it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PEN,  I totally agree with you. It wish everyone would see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pam,ohio</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-362673</link>
		<dc:creator>pam,ohio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-362673</guid>
		<description>Canuck,we know your the same person as Chad. Get over it, and grow up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canuck,we know your the same person as Chad. Get over it, and grow up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NOW</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-362644</link>
		<dc:creator>NOW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-362644</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe everyone is bashing a women who salvaged what dignity she has because of her husband. I think if you can rise up from this, who knows what she could do to help this country.  Women can do anything men can do.
vote HILLARY 08</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can't believe everyone is bashing a women who salvaged what dignity she has because of her husband. I think if you can rise up from this, who knows what she could do to help this country.  Women can do anything men can do.<br />
vote HILLARY 08</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vancouver-Truth</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-362624</link>
		<dc:creator>Vancouver-Truth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-362624</guid>
		<description>The sad thing is that if Obama wins it will be seen by some as an anti-woman vote.  If Hillary wins it will be seen by some as an anti-black vote.  All of this is because CNN and other media has not given us enough information about  candidates strategies and background to make a true informed decision based on ability rather than emotion. I&#039;m for Hillary because I know her best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sad thing is that if Obama wins it will be seen by some as an anti-woman vote.  If Hillary wins it will be seen by some as an anti-black vote.  All of this is because CNN and other media has not given us enough information about  candidates strategies and background to make a true informed decision based on ability rather than emotion. I'm for Hillary because I know her best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A. Harrison</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-362594</link>
		<dc:creator>A. Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-362594</guid>
		<description>Right on NOW!

Everyone want&#039;s to pipe up rhretoric about race and gender, but want to fault the Clintons every move they make. 

Is this a case of pure Clinton HATE? 

If so, then you&#039;ve made a prejudice move as bad as liking/disliking for race or gender.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on NOW!</p>
<p>Everyone want's to pipe up rhretoric about race and gender, but want to fault the Clintons every move they make. </p>
<p>Is this a case of pure Clinton HATE? </p>
<p>If so, then you've made a prejudice move as bad as liking/disliking for race or gender.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernie</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-362552</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-362552</guid>
		<description>ANONYMOUS,
I KNOW MAXINE WATERS AND I CAN TELL YOU IF BILLARY CLINTON IS OKAY WITH HER, BILLARY IS TOO LEFT WING FOR ME. MAXINE WATERS IS A LEFT-WING NUT AND SHE WILL EVENTUALLY BE BOOTED OUT OF OFFICE BY ALL OF THE ILLEGAL ALIENS IN HER DISTRICT IN WATTS.

THAT WON&#039;T BE A DAY TOO SOON FOR ME.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ANONYMOUS,<br />
I KNOW MAXINE WATERS AND I CAN TELL YOU IF BILLARY CLINTON IS OKAY WITH HER, BILLARY IS TOO LEFT WING FOR ME. MAXINE WATERS IS A LEFT-WING NUT AND SHE WILL EVENTUALLY BE BOOTED OUT OF OFFICE BY ALL OF THE ILLEGAL ALIENS IN HER DISTRICT IN WATTS.</p>
<p>THAT WON'T BE A DAY TOO SOON FOR ME.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill, Covington,LA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-362485</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill, Covington,LA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-362485</guid>
		<description>Iris:

you want someone in the whitehouse that will unite the parties. Forget it, it&#039;s not going to happen. In my eighty years the parties have not united, and I hope they never do. We don&#039;t need a one party system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iris:</p>
<p>you want someone in the whitehouse that will unite the parties. Forget it, it's not going to happen. In my eighty years the parties have not united, and I hope they never do. We don't need a one party system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canuck</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-362477</link>
		<dc:creator>Canuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-362477</guid>
		<description>RIGHT ON CHAD!

and YOU  &#039;give it up&#039;  Matt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RIGHT ON CHAD!</p>
<p>and YOU  'give it up'  Matt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G. E. Smith</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-362441</link>
		<dc:creator>G. E. Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-362441</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve listened to both sides of the debate about race and gender and I firmly believe that both candidates have to stop the using false accusations against each and focus on what they can do to better this country. If both candidates don&#039;t stop we will eventually end up with 4 more years of Republican rule.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've listened to both sides of the debate about race and gender and I firmly believe that both candidates have to stop the using false accusations against each and focus on what they can do to better this country. If both candidates don't stop we will eventually end up with 4 more years of Republican rule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JPB, KY</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-362392</link>
		<dc:creator>JPB, KY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-362392</guid>
		<description>I am disgusted with Obama and Clinton&#039;s campaigns. One running on race, the other on gender, whether they admit it or not...Can&#039;t hide the obvious! I wish we could wipe the slate clean and find new candidates to run.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am disgusted with Obama and Clinton's campaigns. One running on race, the other on gender, whether they admit it or not...Can't hide the obvious! I wish we could wipe the slate clean and find new candidates to run.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel, Richmond, VA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-362342</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel, Richmond, VA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-362342</guid>
		<description>Dumb.  NOW has outlived its usefulness.  Obama &#039;08</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dumb.  NOW has outlived its usefulness.  Obama '08</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: burnham scott</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-362260</link>
		<dc:creator>burnham scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-362260</guid>
		<description>FINALLY, a few good men have summoned up the courage to prefer a candidate that their wives do not neccessily approve of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FINALLY, a few good men have summoned up the courage to prefer a candidate that their wives do not neccessily approve of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-362231</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-362231</guid>
		<description>Wow, talk about bigotry here! Should we call them racists in return? What a travesty, but at least these people have been exposed for their bigotry disguised as a fight for equality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, talk about bigotry here! Should we call them racists in return? What a travesty, but at least these people have been exposed for their bigotry disguised as a fight for equality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-362227</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-362227</guid>
		<description>Honestly, this is sick, sad, and crazy. Betrayal? Supporting another Democrat is now seen as betrayal? Reasonable people can disagree on which of these candidates has the best plans for America, but both of them are light-years better than even the best Republican and NOW should recognize that. 

And, really, all the women writing that this is about men not being able to vote for a woman, shame on each and every one of you. You have no idea what you are talking about. There are many men, me included, who have worked on or for campaigns for women for office, and done so proudly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, this is sick, sad, and crazy. Betrayal? Supporting another Democrat is now seen as betrayal? Reasonable people can disagree on which of these candidates has the best plans for America, but both of them are light-years better than even the best Republican and NOW should recognize that. </p>
<p>And, really, all the women writing that this is about men not being able to vote for a woman, shame on each and every one of you. You have no idea what you are talking about. There are many men, me included, who have worked on or for campaigns for women for office, and done so proudly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly, San diego, ca</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-362140</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly, San diego, ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-362140</guid>
		<description>This is the problem the Democratic party now faces in general. For years they have divided everyone up into groups. All the minorities over here (and then subdivided them further; Black, Brown, Asian, Islander, Indian, etc). Now all the women over here (oh, and subdivide them too). Now all you GLTB over in that corner. Get the poor over here. Put the rich and well off over their, under the spot lite. ETC...
Worked fine as long as you had some White Guy who could pander to all of the individual groups, feel their pain so to speak. Regardless of whether the annoited one actually ever did anything to solve the problem.
Now you have 2 major candidates from 2 of the major subsets.
Regardless of issue or reason, If you support the woman, your a racist. If you support the minority, your sexist. It&#039;s a good thing Edwards is Strait, otherwise to not support him would be Homophobic.
Finally, too late, the Democratic Party is seeing the problem with dividing people into groups and pandering to each of those groups, rather than just seeing everyone as a person and trying to do whats best overall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the problem the Democratic party now faces in general. For years they have divided everyone up into groups. All the minorities over here (and then subdivided them further; Black, Brown, Asian, Islander, Indian, etc). Now all the women over here (oh, and subdivide them too). Now all you GLTB over in that corner. Get the poor over here. Put the rich and well off over their, under the spot lite. ETC...<br />
Worked fine as long as you had some White Guy who could pander to all of the individual groups, feel their pain so to speak. Regardless of whether the annoited one actually ever did anything to solve the problem.<br />
Now you have 2 major candidates from 2 of the major subsets.<br />
Regardless of issue or reason, If you support the woman, your a racist. If you support the minority, your sexist. It's a good thing Edwards is Strait, otherwise to not support him would be Homophobic.<br />
Finally, too late, the Democratic Party is seeing the problem with dividing people into groups and pandering to each of those groups, rather than just seeing everyone as a person and trying to do whats best overall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: notevenfordogcatcher</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-362120</link>
		<dc:creator>notevenfordogcatcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-362120</guid>
		<description>Ready to MISLEAD from day one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ready to MISLEAD from day one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe,va</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-362077</link>
		<dc:creator>joe,va</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-362077</guid>
		<description>Feelings, that is the reason this country is falling apart is because of hurting feelings. I can&#039; t stand being political correct about everything. Stop crying already</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feelings, that is the reason this country is falling apart is because of hurting feelings. I can' t stand being political correct about everything. Stop crying already</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nik, Houston, TX</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-362021</link>
		<dc:creator>Nik, Houston, TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-362021</guid>
		<description>Looks like people reading CNN are not necessarily smart enough to comprehend the article.  NOW is not complaining that Kennedy didn&#039;t endorse a woman, they&#039;re upset because he didn&#039; endorse THEIR candidate after what they thought was a strong alliance with Kennedy.   Obama doesn&#039;t have experience with strenghtening the purpose of NOW (women equalities) like other presidents have like Bill Clinton, so obviously Kennedy&#039;s endorsement of this novice feels a betrayal in the eyes of a group he works closely with and who supported each other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like people reading CNN are not necessarily smart enough to comprehend the article.  NOW is not complaining that Kennedy didn't endorse a woman, they're upset because he didn' endorse THEIR candidate after what they thought was a strong alliance with Kennedy.   Obama doesn't have experience with strenghtening the purpose of NOW (women equalities) like other presidents have like Bill Clinton, so obviously Kennedy's endorsement of this novice feels a betrayal in the eyes of a group he works closely with and who supported each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shrum</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-361934</link>
		<dc:creator>Shrum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-361934</guid>
		<description>WHAT A SURPRISE THE PARTY OF DIVERSITY WANTS BLACKS JUST FOR THEIR VOTES. HOW COULD THIS UPSTART BLACK MAN THINK HE HAS A CHANCE WHEN A WHITE WOMAN WANTS THAT JOB. OF ALL THE THINGS. WE ALL KNOW THE CIVIL RIGHTS LAWS MOSTLY BENEFIT WHITE WOMAN FIRST.

THE DEMOCRATS PARTY OF DIVERSITY HA HA HA HA. THAT&#039;S A BIG LAUGH!!

VOTE FOR ANYBODY BUT BILLARY AND ANYBODY BUT LOVERBOY GIULIANI.

HOW ABOUT RON PAUL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WHAT A SURPRISE THE PARTY OF DIVERSITY WANTS BLACKS JUST FOR THEIR VOTES. HOW COULD THIS UPSTART BLACK MAN THINK HE HAS A CHANCE WHEN A WHITE WOMAN WANTS THAT JOB. OF ALL THE THINGS. WE ALL KNOW THE CIVIL RIGHTS LAWS MOSTLY BENEFIT WHITE WOMAN FIRST.</p>
<p>THE DEMOCRATS PARTY OF DIVERSITY HA HA HA HA. THAT'S A BIG LAUGH!!</p>
<p>VOTE FOR ANYBODY BUT BILLARY AND ANYBODY BUT LOVERBOY GIULIANI.</p>
<p>HOW ABOUT RON PAUL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No Voting for Clinton</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-361777</link>
		<dc:creator>No Voting for Clinton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-361777</guid>
		<description>Hillary hasn&#039;t accomplished anything that shows me she&#039;s ready to lead. I don&#039;t think she would be where she is know if it wasn&#039;t for her husband. I don&#039;t know what leadership qualities people actually see in her. I think people have the right to back anyone. No one knows why a individual decides to back one vs. another except that individual. I believe a woman can run this country just not Hillary. Can someone please tell why her records are sealed !!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary hasn't accomplished anything that shows me she's ready to lead. I don't think she would be where she is know if it wasn't for her husband. I don't know what leadership qualities people actually see in her. I think people have the right to back anyone. No one knows why a individual decides to back one vs. another except that individual. I believe a woman can run this country just not Hillary. Can someone please tell why her records are sealed !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grace stephenson</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-361771</link>
		<dc:creator>grace stephenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-361771</guid>
		<description>being an african american woman, i think that oprah winfrey, toni morrison and all those other top notch women who supportd obaama over mrs clinton have betrayed us as women,  as for ted kennedy, he is just sexist and a betrayal. for the way they have betrayed us women and the american people,  we will answer at the polls.  i am making sure as much women as possible go out in droves and vote for mrs clinton.  i am ashamed being a black woman to see how my fellow black people are so ungratrful to the clintons.  we will retaliate at the polls and mrs. clinton will be the nominee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>being an african american woman, i think that oprah winfrey, toni morrison and all those other top notch women who supportd obaama over mrs clinton have betrayed us as women,  as for ted kennedy, he is just sexist and a betrayal. for the way they have betrayed us women and the american people,  we will answer at the polls.  i am making sure as much women as possible go out in droves and vote for mrs clinton.  i am ashamed being a black woman to see how my fellow black people are so ungratrful to the clintons.  we will retaliate at the polls and mrs. clinton will be the nominee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Betty Garofano</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-361687</link>
		<dc:creator>Betty Garofano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-361687</guid>
		<description>Has  anyone noticed, the new voters guide issued by the catholic church says that it is &quot;intrinsically evil&quot; to support legal abortion or promotion of racism, but it is alright to promote sexism. I guess cnn agrees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has  anyone noticed, the new voters guide issued by the catholic church says that it is "intrinsically evil" to support legal abortion or promotion of racism, but it is alright to promote sexism. I guess cnn agrees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: REPTILE</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/28/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-361638</link>
		<dc:creator>REPTILE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/29/womens-group-slams-kennedy-for-betrayal-2/#comment-361638</guid>
		<description>This gender issue WONT SOLVE anything… unless there is a law to calculate specific percentages of men, women, religion and race required in every job, organizaion etc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This gender issue WONT SOLVE anything… unless there is a law to calculate specific percentages of men, women, religion and race required in every job, organizaion etc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
