January 30, 2008
Posted: 03:00 PM ET
Carter lavished praise on Barack Obama.
Carter lavished praise on Barack Obama.

WASHINGTON (CNN) — One former president has long assumed a very outspoken role in the presidential race. Now another is speaking up.

Jimmy Carter says he's not formally endorsing any candidate, but in an interview with the Wall Street Journal, the former president lavished praise on Barack Obama, calling his campaign "extraordinary"

"Obama's campaign has been extraordinary and titillating for me and my family," Carter told the newspaper in an interview published in its Wednesday edition. According to the paper, Carter was particularly praiseworthy of the Illinois senator's rhetorical skills, comparing them to those of Martin Luther King, Jr.

Carter also said Obama "will be almost automatically a healing factor in the animosity now that exists, that relates to our country and its government."

Carter, a onetime governor of Georgia and one of only two Democrats to win the White House in the last forty years, also said he thinks Obama's candidacy could put several southern states in play in a general election match up.

Carter also commented on the recent criticism surrounding Bill Clinton, following that former president's comments on the campaign trail that some have viewed as racially divisive. Carter said Clinton personally called him to explain the remarks.

"He doesn't call me often, but the fact that he called me this morning and spent a long time explaining his position indicates that it's troublesome to them, the adverse reaction," he said.

"I told him I hoped it would die down. — the charged atmosphere concerning the race issue," Carter continued. "And I think it will."

– CNN Producer Alexander Mooney

Filed under: Barack Obama • Jimmy Carter


Dario   February 6th, 2008 11:51 am ET

President Carter is a great man, Im truly believe you are, and I respect , president Carter. YOU SAVE MY LIFE MR PRESIDENT.

msd1   February 1st, 2008 5:53 pm ET

Thank you, President Carter.

Your praise for Obama, the campaign he has run and his potential for healing our country and the world is endorsement enough for those of us who respect you and the work you have done for future generations.

lc   January 30th, 2008 9:58 pm ET

KYNNE-

As an educated black woman who has been in countless situations over the years where someone white has told me to my face that I am "different" from "regular" black people, I think I have a right to take offense when Obama is heaped with superlatives and compliments that paint him as the second coming.

WHY WOULD RACIST REMARKS FROM A FEW WHITES GIVE YOU THE "RIGHT" TO BE OFFENDED BY PEOPLE'S PRAISES OF OBAMA? It does not.!!!

YOUR BLACKNESS SHOULD NOT MAKE YOU ANY MORE OR LESS OFFENDED OR HONORED BY THE PRAISE AND CRITICISM THAT OBAMA RECEIVES.

DO YOU THINK OBAMA HAS ANYTHING TO DO WITH WHAT OTHERS THINK AND SAY ABOUT HIM? NO. He does not control the opinions of others.

To be fair I understand if you somehow believe that Hillary is more qualified.

However, it is odd that you feel that because of your skin color you have a "rght" to be offended that others have political views that differ from yours and that you feel it is your duty to disregard their opinions based on the color of Obama's skin. I think it would be best if you stick to fact based opinions and not try to give your argument credence based on the color of your skin.

TFF S.Carolina   January 30th, 2008 8:52 pm ET

I'll try this again…I truly love Jimmy Carter and all that he does for our country and abroad and the Jimmy Carter will say something titillating about Hillary at the 2008 democratic convention right before Hillary accepts the 08′ democraction nomination.

TFF S.Carolina   January 30th, 2008 8:49 pm ET

Greg…can I get an AMEN, best comment tonight.

TFF S.Carolina   January 30th, 2008 8:43 pm ET

I'm watching the CNN debate…besides Anderson, who are other folks asking questions?

ms blue   January 30th, 2008 8:24 pm ET

i to no why the new york post is say that about obama and ted Kennedy are at a old boy clubs is not like that. im a Afro American women i feel she could come to them as well they can come to her. im tired of the cinton it time for a change so make a change

Glade Brosi   January 30th, 2008 8:12 pm ET

President Carter,
Thank you for your peaceful Presidency. Please formally support Barack Obama for President.

greg   January 30th, 2008 7:49 pm ET

January 30, 2008 7:47 pm ET
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
Why dont they put obamas wife back in the spotlight… when the public sees what they are getting for a first lady the race will be over….

it would be nice to get through moderation

Murry   January 30th, 2008 7:49 pm ET

Thank you President Carter!
Another one of the Clinton's friends are moving towards Obama. The Clintons should take that as a sign that they are doing something seriously wrong instead of just brushing it off or ignoring it.
As Toni Morrision said in her endorsement of Obama, youth does not equal lack of wisdom. Senator Obama is able to make the right decisions and take us down the right path.
I have no doubt that Hillary would be able to get a lot accomplished but it may the be the right things. On top of that she would alienate many people, as we are seeing.
I am a woman and I support Barack Obama!
Obama 08

Bobby CA   January 30th, 2008 7:44 pm ET

GO Hillary 2008! Obama gets back school! Or you are becoming a CHINA emperor and there many old, dieing men stand your back.

GO Hillary 2008!

Vince in NC   January 30th, 2008 7:34 pm ET

Unbelievable! So many mean-spirited attacks on Jimmy Carter by the Clinton backers. Just goes to show they will do anything and attack anybody that doesn't back their cause.

Doris   January 30th, 2008 7:25 pm ET

adanma January 30, 2008 5:15 pm ET

Doris I am disappionted by your comments. I will be surprised if I found out you had any education.

Oh that's right only the uneducated people are backing Clinton. Whatever - it doesnt take a genius to figure out Obama. By the way FOX had a story on Obama. Said he was going to donate to charity some of the money he got from his friend in Illinois. Wonder if he is also giving back the house.

Edd of West Hollwood, CA   January 30th, 2008 7:23 pm ET

SILENCE is GOLDEN sometimes. There is no way, HILLARY will loose this battle. SHE STILL LEADS THE NATIONAL POLLS! She started her campaign way back before, this is the reason why she has a strong base support now! We have not heard of Obama before, he only resurfaced just now. Even Illinois residences do not know him until now! What is his major achievement?

Anyway, I will go for Hillary since I believe in her vision. She is qualified to do the job and she is the only one who can beat any Republican! GO HILLARY!

Patrick   January 30th, 2008 7:20 pm ET

The vitriol aimed at Hillary (and Carter) on this cite is appalling. Most of the obviously biased accusations are based on media innuendo, mis-interpretation, vicious exaggerations, and many lies, What has this woman done to deserve such contempt? Specifics, please.

At the same time, what has Obama done to deserve sainthood?

Pat, NY   January 30th, 2008 7:19 pm ET

He said Obama's CAMPAIGN was extraordinary. He didn't endorse him. Can't anyone just let someone's words stand, without redefining their meaning?

John G, New York, NY   January 30th, 2008 7:00 pm ET

Regardless of what you may think of President Carter's politics or his effectiveness while serving in the White House, posting hateful and vitriolic things about a genuinely good man is not a virtue and it reflects poorly on your character.

Writing mean-spirited things is easy - dedicating your life to a "calling" of doing good with your life is hard. Whether you voted for him…or even whether you like him…to question Jimmy Carter's heart and soul is a shameful thing.

Constance   January 30th, 2008 6:53 pm ET

The reason that Obama can bring change is becasue he IS the change. His continued decency demonstrates that. He is not cynical. I want a leader who faces challenges with hope. This is a marvelous qualification.

I can't believe that any candidate would be capable of stepping into the Presidency with all the answers and knowledge. That seems unreasonable. The world is a dynamic and changing place. A person with solid character would be capable of facing what comes with an attitude that promotes finding genuine solutions that serve many.

It would seem to me that having good character is a meaningful and legitimate qualification for being President.

I would love to see this country pull out of it's spiraling decline into cynicism. I understand that Hillary may have more experience, but that is insufficent.

Obama '08

Crane   January 30th, 2008 6:53 pm ET

About experience…..Last time I checked, the president of the U.S does not isolate himself in his bedroom with the door locked, when making decisions for America. He usually has advisors and several other people who influence the decisions…..There goes the silly argument about Obama not having any experience. I think the experience argument is most commonly used by whites who don't want to see a black man in office (even if the woman who broght him into this world is a white woman). As for Blacks who make the same lame argument, they are just misinformed as to how the president makes decisions. Also, I am curious as to what experience Hillary has, that Barack lacks. Being the wife of the president does not make you president. Here's a radical comment, but I'll make it anyway: The fact that Bill cheated on Hillary could suggest that their marriage during his presidency was not as close as it should have been. With that logic, it's hard to imagine that he shared much of his presidential knowledge with her, during his presidency. Sure she has an advantage (sleeping every night in the same bed as one of the most popular presidents in history - Bill) but that does not make Hillary an experienced person, as far as the American presidency is concerned.

matt   January 30th, 2008 6:44 pm ET

Stay Focused:_
Sorry I commented thinking that you deleted my post. I appreceiate your thoughts.
I just want a person who can show me the future.
Thanx!

john Gio, NYC   January 30th, 2008 6:43 pm ET

Jimmy Carter. Probably the WORST president ever. 14% Inflation, 14% unemployment, Iran hostage crisis. One term loser!

stan pitts pa   January 30th, 2008 6:42 pm ET

i believe the democrats will take the white house this time, but only if obama is the nominee!

matt   January 30th, 2008 6:34 pm ET

Mr. Stay Focused:-

It looks like I'm living in Iran or China or Cuba. This is a blog and let people write. Please do not delete the posts unless they are Obscene!
Many people are feeling exactly the same as I'm doing.

Randy - Denver   January 30th, 2008 6:32 pm ET

Isn't it interesting how all these people post about tyhe "insiders' and "old guard" supporting Obama and then say he does not know how to get things done in Washington? I suppose running on a platform that says the old ways of doing things are wrong and then CONVINCING the "old guard" and "insiders" to go along with you is somehow not a sing that you can make things happen and is a sign that you are too inexperianced for the job? I also must ask how being married to a president makes you experianced enough for the job? I was married to a bartender and yet I manage to spill soda every time I pour it and cannot honestly tell you the difference between gin and vermouth… and my wife was married to a sailor for 21 years and yet she gets seasick on a calm day and has no idea how to fix a seawater pump. I am not one to worry aobut dynasties or any of that type of crap but I do find that after reading the platforms of BOTH Ms. Clinton and Mr. Obama, and going to both their websites, and doing the research on their ideas at other sites, that while they are close in most regards in ideas and plans the Mr. obama has a better chance of implementing these ideas. After all he has convinced the "old guard" or "insiders" to support him as well as older people and younger people. For the record I am a white male and would love to vote for a woman who could do the job and actually get things done but both my wife and I agree Ms. Clinton would not be able to work beyond those who, justly or unjustly, hate her she tends to attack when provoked whereas Mr. Obama tends to smile. I think that is a more mature response.

Marie   January 30th, 2008 6:31 pm ET

Thanks CNN for NEVER putting my anti Obama comments on the blog. But of course, I am not voting for CNN's candidate.

Vic   January 30th, 2008 6:31 pm ET

Uh-Oh, President Carter. You stepped into the race "thing" that you are so holier-than-thou castigating Bill Clinton for. Clinton's words: "Jesse Jackson won here, twice, and won both times. He ran a good campaign; Senator Obama is running a good campaign." Boy, did Clinton catch it! Carter's words: "He (Obama) has the rhetorical skill of Martin Luther King, Jr." Now all we need is something with which we can compare Obama to Ted Kennedy. Don't say JFK, because I was there, and believe me, "never the twain shall meet!"

What's wrong with the above quotations?

Cable King Pittsburgh PA   January 30th, 2008 6:12 pm ET

OK Jimmy, everyone knows you were not exactly the best President we ever had.

When it comes to best former presidents you be da man!

Stay focused   January 30th, 2008 6:04 pm ET

Matt

Although this will be your first election…..you seem to be a lot more informed and intelligent than a lot of these older voters who have been posting on this board. Is this what is meant by "experienced individuals" because if it is, then Lord knows we don't need another uniformed, unintelligent, person running this country based on experience (or should I say, lack of)

As a young person, you seem to be very informed…..that's the type of President we need. OBAMA '08

matt   January 30th, 2008 6:03 pm ET

MARK MY WORDS!

I DON'T HATE CLINTONS. BUT I HAVE A GENUINE CONCERN. BILL CLINTON WILL PULL THE MAJOR STRINGS IN HILLARY'S ADMINISTRATION. LONG TIME LOBBYISTS WILL BE BACK IN LINE LOOKING FOR FAVORS, FROM OUTSOURCING AGENTS TO DRUG COMPANIES. BILL WILL HELP HILLARY IN MANIPULATING CONCEALING AND MISREPRESENTING THE FACTS AS HE HAS BEEN THERE AND HAS DONE IT.

WE WILL REGRET THAT AFTER 4 LONG YEARS!

Azar   January 30th, 2008 6:03 pm ET

Moderator:

I am Obama supporter. Why don't you post my previous comments?

Vince Los Angeles, CA   January 30th, 2008 6:03 pm ET

The New York Post backs Obama

(CNN) – The New York Post – which endorsed Hillary Clinton during her last Senate run – has backed Barack Obama in the Democratic presidential primary, saying “Obama represents a fresh start.”

In an editorial posted on the paper’s Web site Wednesday, the conservative editorial board said the Illinois senator “sorely lacks seasoning,” adding “We don't agree much with Obama on substantive issues. But many Democrats will. He should be their choice on Tuesday.”

The paper has had a complicated relationship with Hillary Clinton. She and her husband have often been sharply criticized by the conservative editorial board, but the New York senator has developed a friendly relationship with the Post’s owner, Rupert Murdoch.

On Wednesday, the board wrote that Obama’s “opponent, and her husband, stand for déjà vu all over again - a return to the opportunistic, scandal-scarred, morally muddled years of the almost infinitely self-indulgent Clinton co-presidency.”

I COULDN'T HAVE SAID IT BETTER MYSELF!!!

LIZ   January 30th, 2008 6:03 pm ET

YES, WE CAN—–keep the good ole boys politics. Endoresments from Ted Kennedy who's been in Congress forever, John Kerry whose wife owns Heinz, and Jimmy Carter.

Really a CHANGE!!!

Help Me   January 30th, 2008 5:57 pm ET

Well said Cliff. To both supporters of Obama and Clinton, let's change the tone of this debate. Please stop the negative posts/attacks. Don't let the media ruin this chance for the democrats to take the whitehouse.

suspect82   January 30th, 2008 5:47 pm ET

LOL -
Carter, Ted Kenndy, and Jesse Jackson: Please stay away! Don't mess it up for Obama 08…….

Ralph   January 30th, 2008 5:41 pm ET

Moderator, why won't you put anti liberal comments on???? Hurt your feelings. Too correct. TYPICAL MEDIA

Henry A   January 30th, 2008 5:39 pm ET

The democrats sure can pick at each other.

IA. Democrat   January 30th, 2008 5:38 pm ET

Posted by a backward thinking conservative…

"D Lowery January 30, 2008 3:56 pm ET

I believe Obama should give it to Hillary, he is too inexperienced and too young. And I don't believe America is ready for a Black Leader."

IA. Democrat   January 30th, 2008 5:35 pm ET

Former President Jimmy Carter is a wonderful statesman and fine gentleman. I sense yet another endorsement coming for the man who may very well be our next president. This is great day-

Kent   January 30th, 2008 5:32 pm ET

George Albert is correct. Carter single handedly destroyed the US Farming institution with his symbolic embargos. As a President, he was one of the worst in modern times. Why do you think he was only a 1 term and out?

Henry   January 30th, 2008 5:32 pm ET

Folks you ned to look at the Clinton Chronicles on the internet and find out what they really are and who they represent……..

phillip   January 30th, 2008 5:32 pm ET

I have not been this exicted about politics in my life! I am 32 yrs old i currently serve in the army(12 yrs) and i am ashamed to say that i have never voted in a presedntial race. Barack Obama has me excited about politics i mean i loved bill but he never made me get off my but and vote. I see change with Obama his story is the American story he really speaks for most Americans and i believe he will make a great Commander in Chief . i dont see Obama as a black or white man i see him as a man who can lead this great country back to its rightful place in this world.

GreatHawk   January 30th, 2008 5:31 pm ET

President Carter is one of the last remaining heroes in the Democratic Party. I hope he will endorse a new generation of leaders with Barack Obama.

Pat   January 30th, 2008 5:30 pm ET

JFK's father bought his presidency and now his brother has the nerve to be 'offended' by how Bill Clinton is conducting himself as he campaigns for Hillary. What a hypocrite. Also, what will Obama owe Teddy if he gets elected? In Washington, no good deed goes unrewarded!

Gave Up   January 30th, 2008 5:30 pm ET

If we want any kind of change we will not vote for any incumbants, or any of these smooth talking politicians. But, we will vote, and 4 years later we will be blogging again whinning and complaining. C ya in 4 years. The elected are only going to get worse. Look at the past presidents, only getting worse.

alexis   January 30th, 2008 5:28 pm ET

One Obama doesnt salute the flag….How can he even be allowed to run for President
Two Obama doesnt believe in god….
He will bring this country down… he cant even handle Clinton(turning his back on her ) what makes people think he can handle the country with maturity????

stan pitts pa   January 30th, 2008 5:22 pm ET

im sick of the bush-clinton-bush dynasty we have a democracy folks not a monarchy, lets end this rule of America by 2 families, lets preserve our democratic integrity,say no to hillbilly, yes to the future, obama08!

tomw   January 30th, 2008 5:21 pm ET

OBAMA 08 OBAMA 08 OBAMA 08 FIRED UP READY TO GO YES WE CAN

Cathy in Walnut, California   January 30th, 2008 5:20 pm ET

The "Clintons" didn't/don't have integrity or moral principles in their marriage so what makes us think they will run the "White House" any different! It's unintelligent to vote for someone who has already showed you their ethics.
Cathy in California

scl   January 30th, 2008 5:16 pm ET

I don't see why everyone is bashing President Carter simply because of his impression of Obama's message of extraordism (he clearly says that he is not supporting Obama). The issue here is Obama vs Clinton, in deciding who's the best candidate of the Democratic party and who will beat the Republicans not changing your vote bacause of a former President. All this critism and racial tension from comments from the black women bashing Obama is a disgrace of their own race. I am a white woman that sees Obama as a new leader and will bring about change in this county. He has more experience than President's Bush and Bill Clinton together. he All I see is Clintonism "old politics as usual" back into the White House. I am a government retiree and know how inside politics work, for I have worked through several Administrations and different govt. agencies for the past 30 years, almost the same amount of time that Hillary says she has 35 years experience. I didn't know of the woman until she became First Lady. I respect her as a strong woman and what she has gone through during the Clinton White House years. But, what has Hillary brought to the table for the past 35 years as she claims. I see the Clinton Campaign doing anything to get elected. Yes, Bill was a good President, but who's running for President here, Bill or Hillary? The fact that Hillary is a woman does not mean that she is the best candidate, in which some of you woman have expressed. Sounds like some of you are voting for her because you are biased against men. I think Hillary is playing victim when she says she reached for Obama's hand during the Pres. Union Speech. Has she nothing else to talk about, except the Clinton campaign complaining once again. This is an insult to American voters. Again, this is just another tactic for her to plead that she is victim . She's only jealous that Ted Kennedey did not support her. I am with Obama all the way. So, wake up people and get with the program! I hear a lot of bias against Obama, especially from the women of his own race. He is his own person. Just because his mother is white does not make him indifferent against his race. I see him strongly for all people, not just a few. A strong supporter from Virginia.

Deborah   January 30th, 2008 5:16 pm ET

OBAMA '08, thanks Mr. Carter. Please forgive me Mr. Cafferty, but I would like for you to answer my question about the Florida primary's, because I am voting for the first time. If the vote's in Florida didn't count, how come everyone including Senator Clinton are claiming her victory, when also there are no Delegates. And what are they going to do with the winning votes? Will they attach them to her votes on Super Tuesday? That would'nt be right. Thanks for your time, and will you e-mail me back. Also I asked this question to Mr. Lou Dobb's but he did not respond back, I guess because listening to him on CNN, he is a Hillary supporter, so maybe that is why. Again thanks for listening.

Dave in Houston   January 30th, 2008 5:15 pm ET

I think he is just the only person I know of who can say the word "titillating" with a straight face. For me and everyone else, it's a pretty easy punchline.

adanma   January 30th, 2008 5:15 pm ET

Doris I am disappionted by your comments. I will be surprised if I found out you had any education. Diana I totally agree with you. Its an afront for any person to accept or reject a candidate on such flimsy foundation as race or gender. I think personality should play a part. President Carter has proved himself a remarkable human and has touched more lifes than 90% of the people on Earth now could. He is widely loved and respected. Being a good human counts more to me than being a good anything else. Obama can heal and America needs healing.

Anton   January 30th, 2008 5:06 pm ET

Please read and reply!

My company was hiring project managers. I have some experince leading a mid size team and I delivered 80% of what was expected of me. When I asked my company to hire me for the project manager position, I laid down a good case in front of management. They hired someone with more experience than me. I don't have any hard feelings cos it was the right thing to do.

Then how can we give the position of "Manage America" to someone who doesnot have enough experience. I know Obama has laid out a good case for being the nominee, but fact is he wants us to believe his words. Why can't he be in senate for few more terms and then come back and seek the nomination.

Black Women in Florida for Hillary   January 30th, 2008 5:05 pm ET

Go Hillary!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
President Hillary Clinton 2008!!

kare   January 30th, 2008 5:04 pm ET

I wonder did we get his full comments?? I liked him a lot, yet only 4 years in office, his vision and empathy was not enough. He is an excellant man.

Jenna   January 30th, 2008 5:03 pm ET

Carter needs to go back to his Peanut farm, he has no bearings for a presidential election.

Carrie   January 30th, 2008 5:02 pm ET

Why all the negative about President Carter? He is a respectful, honest, and caring man; who has done alot of good for this country and around the world. He knows what is needed to fix all this anger.

david anderson   January 30th, 2008 5:01 pm ET

Obama is SPECIAL! Wake up America and dont miss this chance!

Jenna   January 30th, 2008 5:01 pm ET

Carter need to go back to his Penut farm, he has no bearings for a presidential election.

Cliff Baker   January 30th, 2008 4:59 pm ET

To thad nze,

Actually, what you will be witnessing is this: Bush - Clinton - Bush - Clinton - Clinton. Do you understand why? Here is a nightmare scenario for you: the Clintons will occupy the White House for the next 16 years.

Hillary in the White House from 2008-2016. And by 2016 Chelsea will be 36 years old (35 is the min. age requirement).

To my dear extremist Republican, history is in the making. You all will witness the FIRST woman to become president, the FIRST husband and wife to become president, and the FIRST father, mother and daughter to become president.

Hillary 08
Hillary 12
Chelsea 16
Chelsea 20

Go Hillary! Go Chelsea!

Patrick   January 30th, 2008 4:58 pm ET

Speaking figuratively —sincerely.

Matt   January 30th, 2008 4:58 pm ET

It's sad to sit and read these blogs and see how the majority of people who say that Obama has no substance. You all are misguided and show your own ignorance by not taking ten minutes out of your day to visit his website and reading the issues. This will be my first Presidential Election in which I can vote in, and considering myself a democrat I actually took the time to read all of the candidates positions. I am picking Obama because I believe that he has the most substance and the best answers to dealing with the problems facing America. And, unlike those Obama haters who only repeat what they hear on TV and feel that they have an opinion that's actually worth something, I can say that I have made my decision off of reading the candidates positions. Let's attempt to bring about change by making informed decisions instead of "spin" that we hear on TV and vote for the best candidates on their issues. Most importantly we need a Democrat in the White House to fix these problems, and I hope it's OBAMA in 08.

Amy R.   January 30th, 2008 4:57 pm ET

They didn't run that trash because it was false. Hillary appeared on TV saying that she held her hand out to Obama and he snubbed it. She was a complete LIE! I saw 4 photos that showed her reaching out to Ed Kennedy and Obama turning to talk with another person. Hillary NEVER reached her hand out to Obama and she had the NERVE to publicly lie on tv, like her husband mind you, while documented photos have caught her lie. She proves the Clintons can't be trusted and she is dirty campaigning.

Kathy   January 30th, 2008 4:54 pm ET

Endorsement basicly say that they are going to vote for that particular candidate. You and I also have a vote. Basicly endorsements make it seem like a popularity contest and takes away from what is important.

That is why everyone should vote for the issues and values that are important to you not someone else.

The media spin at that moment changes the polls that is pathetic, a laugh or a snub should not influence the way you vote.

We have had 8 years with somebody; people thought they would like to have a beer with. Not what really what issues effected them.

Research the candidate and choose based on the voting pattern as well as what was going on historically at the time.

Are we Lemming's, or are we well informed Americans that make decisions based on thoughtful intellegent choice.

Nestor, Pembroke Pines, FL   January 30th, 2008 4:54 pm ET

This is for you Mr. Moderator of CNN. CAN YOU PLEASE TELL ME WHAT'S YOUR IDEA OF MODERATING? Why don't you publish my comments? Do you find them offensive? Offensive to who? You? or President Carter? P. Carter has to take responsibility for what he says now, before and in the future.

I really don't understand you… I will make sure I send my comments to the director of the media, with whom I have a good relationship, to ask him if CNN is becoming biased or tries to manipulate the information at its will.

If you're going to moderate this way, don't use a blog for that. Blogs are for free expression, as long as it is being done intelligently and without using bad words, from which I do not believe I used any.

Frank   January 30th, 2008 4:54 pm ET

Those are strong words from a former President supporting Obama. Another giant blow to the Clintons. President Carter resonates with Obama because of the qualities of truth, integrity, and dignity that are lacking in the Clintons.

moeshorts   January 30th, 2008 4:52 pm ET

yeah maybe bama can have rezko for vice pres!

concerned   January 30th, 2008 4:51 pm ET

Going for experience not for a great speaker. We need someone to get the change done.

Go Hilliary.

New Yorker, NYC, NY   January 30th, 2008 4:47 pm ET

Since Carter Supports Obama ,

Carter is against Israel. Look like obama is also against israel

JBrown   January 30th, 2008 4:47 pm ET

All this talk about race…..we still have a lot to deal with in this country…can you feel it when you read these posts?

I'm reading "Deams of My Father" right now. Obama grew up in Hawaii when Hawaii was just coming into statehood. Divides existed among the native Hawaiians, the Japanese and the Chinese. No one paid much attention to a little boy being raised by his white grandparents.

So if you really think about this, Barack only learned what its like to be Black in America when he came to the Mainland. His early years did not include the experience of most of African-Americans. Yet, some have judged HIM based on his color and have to interject color into everything that's said and done.

So you must asked yourself–am I looking at Obama the person–or am I really influended by the skin color? It it were not for a father that was out of his life by the time he was 2 years old, we would not be talking about a BLACK MAN.

In the African-American, community, we claim everyone. Obama, you are revered in our community and we understand what you are going through.
Why can't you be just A MAN with a desire to make your country better?

Tanner of LA   January 30th, 2008 4:40 pm ET

I'd rather vote for someone with experience rather than someone who does not know what to do in Day one. We are in deep econonomic mess, the new president shoudl fix the problem created by George Bush. I don't need a neophyte president who just started his political career now. I need a Miracle worker president, this person is not Mc Cain, It will be HILLARY! I can sleep soundly at night having her as the leader of this great nation because I know she will fight for our cause! Go HILLARY!

John   January 30th, 2008 4:39 pm ET

VOTE HILARY - 08, she is the one can stand up to this republicans and fight. Dont make that mistake dont listen to media think reality dont get caught into the speech, easy to talk can he walk the talk…politician allways will be politician.

gw   January 30th, 2008 4:39 pm ET

As president Carter was a disaster - he is at his best when he is not commenting on politics and building houses.

Oliver   January 30th, 2008 4:37 pm ET

And another has-been endorsement for Obama - he really attracts the washed crowd - but no wonder

John   January 30th, 2008 4:37 pm ET

give me a break, why always Clinton have to explain becasue media twist and turn and republican are indirectly doing that so Obama can be highlight, so they can easily crush and win. Hillary is the best thing today America needed, enough this change crap and the old generations guys coming out saying change ya sure,. If you want republican to come as a president then vote for Obama they can wait till for that date because they will put him through a ringer, right now Obama is getting sympathy becasue of the he is african american and the african american are supporting him. But what they forgot to think is if Obama in power he cannot do anything for blacks because it will become raisist, against soanic and the white. So best is neutral president which is clinton is the choice and #1 choice.

WAKE AMERICA VOTE FOR CLINTON! do you think you can change anything in politics give me a break, who can stop the iraq war or the funding it is all politics and Obama is kid in this game it more than just saying change, have to be careful what you say because the system is not that easy to change if anyone tries they will be kicked out or framed of something and will use that as card to use them as a puppy.

John in Columbus, OH   January 30th, 2008 4:36 pm ET

Barack Obama has charisma, the very essence of leadership. He doesn't have to do anything and people are charmed by his personal magnetism.

Hillary Clinton, on the other hand, has to work hard not to completely turn people off. She is not only hate by Republicans (they would no doubt vote in record numbers again) but she is hated by many Democrats. It's not because she is a woman; it's because she simply will say anything, do anything to get elected, and most people cannot tolerate that blatant lack of integrity. I would like to see a woman as President one day. For the longest time, since she became a New York Senator, I thought it would be Hillary Clinton, but after seeing her in action, I can see that she is not the ONE. One day, I hope to support a woman for President, one who is noble and honorable, one that we can be proud to call the First Woman President of the United States.

Steve Newby   January 30th, 2008 4:36 pm ET

Carter's looking pretty good bout now, huh? And ten years from now, everyone's probably gonna see Clinton as saintly after this monster that's in there today.

Crane   January 30th, 2008 4:35 pm ET

1.) Read carefully, people. Carter's comments should not be considered endorsements. And I don't understand how people are telling Carter to shut his old mouth but we live in a country that prides itself on freedom of speech.
2.) People also need to realize that Hillary as president does not automatically equal Bill Clinton as president. Sure Bill was one of the most popular presidents in recent history, but that does not mean that his wife's presidency would be a replica of his.
3.) Let's face it, there is scandal surrounding the Clinton family. I'm pretty sure that if Hillary wins the nomination, her outspoken husband will support her in every way against the Republican nominee (McCain). I think McCain would eat Hillary alive…..The only way Hillary will win the presidency is if she runs against Romney or Huckabee. If Bill even opens his mouth, the Republicans will point fingers to his scandalous ways, and there are some voters who vote on emotions….Hillary would lose that battle even though she's the one who got cheated on by her husband. If you want to see a democrat in the White house, Obama is your best option.
4.) My final comment is a bit racial, but it's probably the most realistic comment you have read all day….here it goes: The so called "terrorists" that the moron currently occupying the white house refers to, are pretty much people of middle eastern decent which is very close to Africa. Although they may be willing to "negotiate" with whomever has any common sense (which automatically excludes George W. Bush), they'd still be more comfortable with a man who's of African decent (Obama) for whatever it's worth. Now should we pick a president based on the racial make-up that most impresses middle easterners…..CERTAINLY NOT, but if "terrorism" is a concern to any of you, just remember that the so called terrorists really despise white america.

Walt, Belton, TX   January 30th, 2008 4:35 pm ET

That should be the kiss of death for Obama. He's being indorsed by the worst President in the last 100 years; the yellow peanut farmer from Georgia!!! Go buy yourself another Nobel Prize for idiocy and compare notes with your cousin Al.

Nobama   January 30th, 2008 4:34 pm ET

I don't care what Carter says.
What I know for sure (which even Oprah doesn't know) is that Obama doesn't have "IT" to be a nominee, not to mention a president.
Gone Obama!

chude dublin   January 30th, 2008 4:32 pm ET

clinton is bed time ! No need to continue just withdraw like Edward.Just give change a chance.Anyway you have no chance.

Bryce   January 30th, 2008 4:31 pm ET

Isn't it nice that CNN edited the interview for us……
Thanks CNN.

david   January 30th, 2008 4:31 pm ET

Carter is a good man, but he should stick to building houses. What did Carter really do when he was president. He could hurt Obama

Jon - Atlanta, GA   January 30th, 2008 4:31 pm ET

To Burning Bridges: Does the same not apply to you? How smart, if your candidate is not the eventual nominee then vote Republican. Party unity at its best.

Kiki   January 30th, 2008 4:30 pm ET

I Agree, vote Obama and stop the cycle!! The Clintons probably have white sheets in their closet, anyway. What a joke they are! Who do they think their fooling!! It was okay for Bill to get the "black vote" (whatever that is) in SC, but when his wife doesn't win, Obama is compared to Jesse Jackson(?). Bill Clinton's racism is as subtle as the tsunami was in Thailand. Just as his extra marital affair in the White House, "Do you see my lips moving, then I must be lying." And to think I voted for Slick Willie in the 90's!!!

Obama 08!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

michael Rios   January 30th, 2008 4:26 pm ET

President Carter did more out of office than in office, Obama should just skip his presidential career and just stay out of office. He would do better out than in. Jimmy Carter…am I the only one that sees this as another weapon in the Republican arsenal.."Obama is another Jimmy Carter…just ask Jimmy Carter"

Vote Hillary…

not

NOOBama

B Houff   January 30th, 2008 4:24 pm ET

Did you know Jimmy Carter pronounces it "nucUler"?

George Albert   January 30th, 2008 4:23 pm ET

Carter is the worst president of the 20th century. He was a catalyst for Islamist terrorism, he killed the economy, he lost Iran to the jihadists.

He is also a racist and a liar. Other than this stuff, Obama may want his support

SC for Hillary   January 30th, 2008 4:16 pm ET

Jimmy Carter, you should not voice any opinion, because you are one of the worst president's in history, I am a democrat, but I feel President Bush is a much better president than Carter in his worst years. Your praising Obama is a bad sign for Obama, because you were just as weak as Obama. Your opinion is wortthless, and no media should remind people of your horrible years as president, by interviewing you. You are a carbon copy of Obama, you were not ready and should never have been elected President, I am sure voters will not make the same mistake with Obama as they made with you.

thad nze   January 30th, 2008 4:15 pm ET

Bush - Clinton - Bush - Clinton????? And America continues to Grief - Do you Get it or not???
WAKE UP AMERICA, it's time for a real change - VOTE OBAMA '08

JB Boston MA   January 30th, 2008 4:13 pm ET

To al the Clintonistas-

It is getting a bit old, having to listen to you all belittle anyone who comes out in favor of Obama. What endorsement would mean something? When Edwards comes out and endorses Obama, will you attack and degrade him as well?

Not only do I want to see Hill and Bill go away, I want all you Clintonistas to go away as well. She is bad for this country as are you.

If you are so blinded that you can't see that what she did in FL was disgusting then you should forfeit your right to vote!

stan pitts pa   January 30th, 2008 4:12 pm ET

ABC= ANYBODY BUT CLINTON, CNN= CLINTON NEWS NETWORK, HRC = PRETENDER-IN-CHEIF! HRC does not represent the strong women of America who stand on their own every day! women of America want a female for president, just not this woman! using her husband for everything is not a good way to show female lead and strenght!

Ginger   January 30th, 2008 4:11 pm ET

How can Obama be for change and align himself with the same old politics of the Ted Kennedy bunch. Was the "change" thing just a slogan.

Carl   January 30th, 2008 4:11 pm ET

Only for those of you that like Hillary Clinton…. go to Youtube…. new video "Dude, Hillary Just Quit the Band"

I hope CNN shows this. It's fun.

Jamie   January 30th, 2008 4:08 pm ET

Wow!!!!

Now THREE reasons to vote for Hilliary!!!!!

Kennedy
Kerry
Carter

dymoy   January 30th, 2008 4:08 pm ET

Let's see…Obama says he's for change and a break from the old Washington politics. Yet the Old Guard seems to be lining up for him or does Kennedy and Carter represent "change"? If he's so much for change, why accept the endorsement or is it going to be old style payback time when he's elected? Obama also is beginning to look much more liberal with these endorsements versus the centralist he purports to be. That will make him more of a divisive candidate than a uniter especially with the conservatives. He talks a good game, but something doesn't feel quite right. I got the same feeling when Bush was first running.

Vera   January 30th, 2008 4:06 pm ET

I'm not sure, but didn't President Clinton sign and even push NAFTA? How has NAFTA done any good for the Amaerican worker? John Edwards was a good candidate. His ideas and his belief in this country would do well as vice-president to Obama. Together, they would be a powerful force in securing the presidency for Democrats. McCain is no joke. He is powerful and smart and we will need a good team to beat him. I'm not sure that Hillary will win against him and I don't think that Obama would want to be her vice-president. They are too different. I have heard many people say they will vote for McCain if HRC wins. John Edwards should definitely endorse Obama because his focus was not doing business as usual and that changing the government is important. That sounds like Obama to me. It's a no brainer decision.

Carl   January 30th, 2008 4:03 pm ET

Go check out the home pages of Clinton and Obama.

Clinton has a salute and a large picture of John and Elizabeth.

Obama has a big picture of HIMSELF and a smaller one of Kennedy.

Michael Moloney.(Ireland)   January 30th, 2008 4:00 pm ET

President Jimmy Carter oozes decency and displays the US at its best, never a bully, dignified even when others attempted to humiliated him and will be
remembered long after more recent leaders are forgotton.

A true statesman and elderstatesman at this stage in his life I respectfully suggest that all Americans give him his due honour.

President Clinton who was committed to the Northern Irish Peace Process and
this we are all eternally grateful. However for a man that should be the last to throw stones, there is a bitter after taste to his agenda of the last few weeks.
He showed a side of himself that many were willing to believe did not exist, depite
good reason to objectively think about.

Obama, what can one say, a breath of fresh air for politics way beyond the shores
of the USA, can he lift politics out of the gutter in all our countries? Can he reestablish belief and faith in the politics of democracy?

I'm from a family of local politicans, for seventy years we have went the roads and
lane ways of our area to get out the vote. In many ways the work of representation has not changed very much, 'Parish Pump Politics' is the legitimate way of helping
your area have a voice.

However as across the globe the level of cynicism here, is high and all politicans are deemed to have a price. It is futile to suggest one could change this perception with reasoned argument.

Might it possible that Barack Obama could enkindle the flame that public life so badly needs in these times?

Is it not possibe that irrespective of however successfull he may or may not be as
President of the US he just might raise the bar for many and bring about a new
age of public representation?

lester   January 30th, 2008 4:00 pm ET

Carter may be brainless at this stage of his life, but then again it is a no brainer to pick Obama over Hillary.

.

Max   January 30th, 2008 3:59 pm ET

Who cares what Carter thinks. Look how his run in office went. And why in the world would we want someone to be president if they won't even pledge allegiance to the American Flag! It doesn't make a bite of sense. All you who are in favor of Obama need to look at the big picture. So he says all these great things and all this crap that he stands for. First of all he has little to no expierence and second he DOESN'T pledge allegiance to the AMERICAN flag!

Richenel   January 30th, 2008 3:59 pm ET

One EUROPEAN VOTE !!!

We all vote for OBAMA here!!

OBAMA 2008- 2016

Like Europe already has……you folks need a new inspiring strategy.

Voting for Hilarious won't do you all good.

Voice   January 30th, 2008 3:59 pm ET

Carter is just jealous of Clinton because Carter was never able to get in on that hot intern action.

Sherrie   January 30th, 2008 3:59 pm ET

Hillary needs a wardrobe makeover, can someone volunteer to help her out????

D Lowery   January 30th, 2008 3:56 pm ET

I believe Obama should give it to Hillary, he is too inexperienced and too young. And I don't believe America is ready for a Black Leader.

Bryce K. Dixon   January 30th, 2008 3:54 pm ET

Kerry, Ted, Al now Carter all good people who support Obama wow….

But just a little history they are all losers… Remember? lol

Hilliary 08

Vast Right Wing Conspiracy   January 30th, 2008 3:54 pm ET

This guy presided over THE, THE worst period in American history… so bad was it, that a new economic term was coined, "Stagflation."

Carter was literally King Midas, in reverse.

Obama seems like genuinely nice guy, and while I disagree with much of what he believes re economics and politics, I feel it's my duty as both an American and a good person, to warn Obama not to hitch his wagon to that old broken down horse (Carter). Believe me, there is nothing positive that can come of this for Obama.

Randy - Denver   January 30th, 2008 3:52 pm ET

Carter a loser?
Maybe living through his presidency leaves me with a different viewpoint.
Long lines at gas pumps.. so true I remember them well.. but why did we have long lines? because we would not suck up to dictators in the mid-east. Hostages held for 444 days-yep remember that also why again? oh yeah we would not suck up to dictators in the middle east. let me see interest rates around 20% yep that happened also.. what were they and the trend when he came into office.. oh yeah mid teens and going up, why hmm global markets and money concerns and high inflation he inherited mostly driven by rising oil prices
His answer to these problems.. stay true to what America means, do not give into Middle east dictators, tighten our belts, suck it up and deal with the problem now so we will not have to deal with it in our childrens times. He lost the election after that, Reagan stepped in, gave into the dictators, I was in the military at the time, retired now, and decided that we would give away our values so we could ahve some comfort in our lives then.. and now today we face the same problems never resolved… and Reagan was a GREAT president and Carter the worst???

Patrick   January 30th, 2008 3:52 pm ET

The vitriol aimed at Hillary on this site is appalling. Most of the obvously biased accusations are based on innuendo, deliberate mis-interpretations, vicious exagerations, and many, many out right lies.

What has this woman actually done to deserve such unwarranted contempt?

At the same time, what has Obama done to deserve beatification? that usually doesn't occur until one's demise, and that won't happen until Super Tuesday.

To all you Clinton bashers: your diatribes are food for my conviction.

Nicole   January 30th, 2008 3:52 pm ET

Your comments are hilarious LOL

Obama 08!!!!!!!!!!

James Miller   January 30th, 2008 3:50 pm ET

Let`s break the Bush-Clinton-Bush- Clinton? chain. When people see Hillary, they see Bill. Both Clintons and Bushes are very "polarizing" regardless of what you think of either as president. McCain may be a good man, however, the fact he is a Republican and longtime member of the Senate, he is from the "establishment". —–It doesn`t take a rocket scientist to know where our economy has gone under the present Republican controlled Congress and Presidency. Reminds me of an old and wise saying, " Are you going to believe me - or your lying eyes?"

Stacy Clarks, Texas   January 30th, 2008 3:49 pm ET

for people who keep saying Obama is all "speech" GO TO HIS WEBSITE!! IT IS ALL THERE!! the issues, the problems, everything is laid out on his website!!

And for those who say 80% of Black voting for Obama makes him a "black" candidate, then what about the large percentage of WOMEN who vote for HIllary, then does thta make her the "gender" president?!?! oh please

OBAMA/EDWARDS 08!!!!

WAB   January 30th, 2008 3:48 pm ET

For all you igmo's, Billy Carter died in 1988 due to pancreatic cancer.

It's a toss up for the worst presidents of all time, here's my list:

1. Carter - crazy stagflation - huge unemployment - 19% mortgage rates - inflation, deterioration of the US as a world leader, terrible president absolutely terrible, nothing but goofballs in administration and his family (you might be a redneck….)

2. Bush II - awful communicator, mr stumble-mumbe, lost the biggest opportunity to galvanize the world with mutual respect after 9/11, lost US moral authority around the world, even though taking Sadam was the right thing to do. He took the war on terror to the middle east, nothing happened here, but unable to effectively communicate this the american public. Where is his cabinet? They are a bunch of empty suits, no talent power hungry stiffs. The oil thing bothers me too, he's done nothing to address the single biggest threat to the US and its economy in dealing with the scum in the middle east, undermining the world economy as well.

3. James Buchanan - didn't he marry his cousin in the white house? He did nothing to address the impending seccesion of the southern states…he is widely regarded as a completely ineffective leader.

Don't you love the current state of politics…are these people the best we can get…oy vay! They suck…we should have term limits (perhaps weight limits with Ted Kennedy, what a joke). The house and senate is only into their own power and money grab, nice pensions and health insurance…that is a crime they are commiting on the american people.

Other than that…hoping the Super Bowl is at least competitive.

Peace out!

Conan   January 30th, 2008 3:46 pm ET

From the man who made us the laughing stock on the world and brought us Stagflation. Sweet.

murk   January 30th, 2008 3:46 pm ET

how is the support of a FORMER PRESIDENT considered slow news? all aboard the obama express!

Mr. Duke   January 30th, 2008 3:42 pm ET

Carter is the kiss of DEATH. The worst president EVER!!!!

Jon, Palo Alto, CA   January 30th, 2008 3:41 pm ET

Do you people really think that Senator Obama can deal nose to nose with the likes of Putin and other foreign leaders? The only way he'll get credibility with them is if he does something outrageous like manufacture an excuse to blow somebody up (a la Tonkin or phony WMDs) and then attack. What kind of a commander in chief will he make? What'll he do if some Pakistani general goes looney with an atomic warhead? How will he deal with a USS Cole attack?

How is he going to deal with the overuse of the National Guard? His website suggests that he wants to keep it part of the active military much too long.

Maybe he's eloquent, but he's got few credentials. I volunteered in a church-based neighborhood civil rights organization, too. That's not training for the presidency.

Of course, then there's McCain. The war hero. Flew his plane over North Vietnam and bombed people, military and civilian, then went back to his carrier for a hot meal, a John Wayne movie, and a dry bunk. (Before he screwed up and got shot down.) He's an old-age version of Yosemite Sam. A lot of storm and fuss, and ready for the glue factory.

Romney is a fart in the wind. Nothing.

Clinton is irritating. But she's capable of running the store. Edwards would have been also–I send his campaign twenty-five bucks. Alas.

The next president has to untangle the mess that B has made, and that effort will probably take years.

Maybe what we need is a real, day long, tiring, nose-to nose debate among the remaining 2 or 3 democrats, without the silly crap from "moderators" who are only interested in potshots and gotchas.

But really, I wish they would all go away for six months.

Kwae   January 30th, 2008 3:41 pm ET

Voting returns showed Obama and Edwards scoring high amongst the educated lot of the primaries.

Blog returns would probably be the same.

VICTOR @NJ   January 30th, 2008 3:41 pm ET

I support Hillary Clinton all the way. Mr. Carter is a great figure & a legend in our country and overseas, My respect & congratulations go to him for remaining Neutral on this political race that is exactly the roll of a political legend within a party, maybe Mr. Kennedy should learn more from him.

I am also sorry to see Edwards leave this way, but it is probably the best for our DEMOCRATIC PARTY, because we can now see a one to one debate Hillary & Obama (without Bill, Kennedy, Kerry democrat superstars, overshadowing )

I used to be attracted to Mr. Obama early on the race and actually liked his speeches about him representing the "politics of change and new direction" for our country until one day:
-In IOWA ,during a national political debate in he was asked how do you plan to bring change to America from the politics of the 90ths if the majority of your campaign advisers & staff are ex-Bill Clinton’s advisers? he just smiled and throw a silly joke at Hillary saying I am hoping for you also to advise me Hillary. to me it was a turn-off, a valid question he just avoided it and made me change my mind.

-Also, Mr. Obama, on his famous inspirational speeches has said "repeatedly" that is time to "change all ideas of those old folks and their old politics from Washington" now he seems to be bringing a lot of those OLD FOLKS and his ideas (Kennedy, Kerry ) aboard his POLITICAL SHIP. Why? can he seriously answer that? whatever happened to the politics of CHANGE?

I am sorry if my words sound a little sharp for his sympathizers, but Obama does not come across to me as a man with integrity and EXPERIENCE, he does not convinces me at all. I think he is just Fake, to much of a rookie politician, I will not trust him to be our president.

On the other hand Senator Clinton is the proven candidate to be though, sincere, intelligent, with lots of common-sense, experience & her dedication of MANY YEARS to help family & children of low & medium income levels, who are the base for the future of our country and our American culture. Her strong credentials credential on national security are a plus, she is a lot more knowledgeable than Obama.

Go Hillary Gooooo to the white House

ephon   January 30th, 2008 3:41 pm ET

70% of the nation is anti-war

yet the two front runners are McCain and Hillary, pro waar advocates

america needs to wake up

Michelle, AL   January 30th, 2008 3:41 pm ET

January 30, 2008 1:32 pm ET
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
From Time magazine online.. CNN, are you going to moderate some of your own writers?

There's something peculiar going on with Matthews and this Democratic primary. A lot of people have said there's a sexist or misogynistic tone to his criticism of Hillary, and I do think Matthews' political views are colored by a very male-centric view of politics and personalities. (Is there a more male title on television than Hardball?) But for Matthews last night, it was not the boys against the girls. It was the Good Sixties versus the Bad Sixties. Mad Men versus The Wonder Years. It is probably true, as Andrew Sullivan says, that younger Obama voters want in part to reject a political dialogue dictated by the grievances of Baby Boomers. But Matthews is talking here about moving the dialogue even farther back, to the Sinatra-era Sixties, before everyone got smelly, let their hair go and listened to Joe Cocker.

To the punditocracy's credit, we haven't reached the heights of the post-Iowa swoon yet. Nobody's wondering how soon Hillary will drop out, and you have to imagine that the media haven't totally forgotten the lessons of New Hampshire already. Still, it's hard not to see that the punditocracy embraces bad news for Hillary and good news for Obama more eagerly than the opposite.

Call me cynical, but I wonder if the Obama campaign has thought about making this media dynamic part of their electability argument. The press has a famously contentious relationship with the Hillary Clinton campaign and a famously cozy one with John McCain, who has a good shot at being the Republican nominee. "Barack Obama: Because the press is even more in the tank for us than for John McCain!" Surely there's a way of making that into a catchy bumper sticker.

NO Obama/Osama !!! Please   January 30th, 2008 3:39 pm ET

Great speaker !!!!! That's all !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
We need more than just talkative personality. We need experienced candidate,
who have done some good things in the life (not to buy the house below the market value in connection wit corupted bussines of Rezko, who supported one of the candidate (OBAMA) politycal carrier.
Why this man is in the election. Bad reputation is not alowed in that category !!!!
Obama is trying to clear his name from Rezko link, returning some of the contributions (over $100,000.00 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Wow !!!!!! Doesn't describe well Obama's personality, character !!!!!!!
NO !!!!!! TO OBAMA !!!!!!
I possible could vote for John Edwards, but he is planning to dropp from the race.

HILLARY CLINTON IS THE BEST CANDIDATE !!!!!!!!!

Liz   January 30th, 2008 3:39 pm ET

If you think about this election — truly THINK about it — and you are a person who genuinely wants change, please think about what that means.

As someone who voted for Bill both times, I have to step back and look at the reality of having the Clintons back in the White House —

Is it prudent for us to elect Hillary? Is it "change" for the same 2 FAMILIES to run this country for 30 YEARS? 3 DECADES? During Bill's administration, Hillary came up with an amazing national health care plan. Bill couldn't make it happen and he was not the devisive personality Hillary is.

I don't dislike her, but I believe we need to step away from 2 families having the most powerful position in this country for 30 years. It has all the appearances of an oligarchy rather than a democracy.

Please THINK before you vote.

charlotte   January 30th, 2008 3:38 pm ET

I just wish people would read the whole story posted above.

John   January 30th, 2008 3:37 pm ET

You Carter haters are pathetic. I agree he wasn't the greatest presidents, but to call him a "feckless character" just exposes you as a moron.

Jimmy Carter is one of the most remarkable and accomplished Americans alive. I challenge you to live up to 1/20 of what he's accomplished in his life.

I'd love to hear some of the things you critics have accomplished in your lives. Hint: writing a half-decipherable drivel in a blog does not count.

Liz   January 30th, 2008 3:37 pm ET

If you think about this election — truly THINK about it — and you are a person who genuinely wants change, as someone who voted for Bill both times, I have to step back and look at the reality of having the Clintons back in the White House —

Is it prudent for us to elect Hillary? Is it "change" for the same 2 FAMILIES to run this country for 30 YEARS? 3 DECADES? During Bill's administration, Hillary came up with an amazing national health care plan. Bill couldn't make it happen and he was not the devisive personality Hillary is.

I don't dislike her, but I believe we need to step away from 2 families having the most powerful position in this country for 30 years. It has all the appearances of an oligarchy rather than a democracy.

Please THINK before you vote.

dn   January 30th, 2008 3:36 pm ET

Hillary talk about her experience every time she gets the change. what experience, in the white house? are you kidding me. I didn't know you can have political experience by sleeping in white house for 8yrs.

Brandon   January 30th, 2008 3:36 pm ET

To all Hillary Clinton Supporters Let Me show you the future you want to advocate:

President George Bush- President Bill Clinton- President George Bush- President Hillary Clinton- President Laura Bush- President Roger Clinton-President Jeb Bush- President Chelsea Clinton- President William Bush-
President whoever else Clinton- President whoever else Bush and so on and so on.

Way to kill the Hope!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Larry   January 30th, 2008 3:35 pm ET

I can see it now..OBAMO the YES MAN for the old establisment in washington….Kennedy, Kerry And everyone else thats looking for a lap dog

Rico   January 30th, 2008 3:34 pm ET

Lets be honest
And please dont be afraid to post this comment
Obama is using his race to his advantage.
That is ok unless it stifles free speech.

Judex   January 30th, 2008 3:34 pm ET

I guess Mitt Romney put it at best. A change of Chair in Washington, DC is not the change that America is needed. America needs a complete Make-Over with fresh blood that has not been drinking in the cup of corruption that existed in the Nation Capital. Obama is and only him could provide that kind of change that America is needed. The nockle head that Called John McCain is not suitable for President, he is the same one that was there, administration after administration and seems to enjoy it, he's the same man that standed next to the loser Bush to support him for Iraq war, he's the same man that has been advocated that the war is running good while he's dressed like Mickey Mouse with a bullet proof vest. People wake-up and pledge for change. Hillary and Bill cannot bring those kind of change, using mis-characterization and distortion of true.

TMV   January 30th, 2008 3:33 pm ET

…. and for someone who holds such disdain for "Washington Insiders" — Obama sure likes collectin' them in his pocket! eh?

Cookie   January 30th, 2008 3:33 pm ET

Oh my GOSH….I wouldn't want his endosement!! That man just needs to STOP TALKING…I am not a big fan of Obama but I am even less of a fan of CARTER!!!

deann   January 30th, 2008 3:31 pm ET

I love and respect former president Jimmy Carter, as today, we have to face a very difficult time, we need a strong leader to restore our country in day one , and should have experience to bring the really change to benifit to the hard working American citizen, we do not have time to play again or waste time for training, all American should wake up.

Mike   January 30th, 2008 3:31 pm ET

It is looking like we are going to have to choose between the oldest-ever elected president who says we may be in Iraq for hundreds of years; or a young forward-thinking leader that will help repair the foreign relations that have been destroyed in the last 7 years…

Paul   January 30th, 2008 3:30 pm ET

My choices of who I'm voting for in November is really clear: if Obama is nominated, I'm voting for him. If Hillary is nominated, I'm voting for McCain(because in my eyes, Hillary and McCain are the exact same candidate - and I trust even McCain more than Hillary). There are hundreds of thousands of people(possibly millions) in my boat - those who will vote McCain over Hillary if given the chance, when we would have voted Obama if given that choice.

Hillary Clinton will not be elected president.

TMV   January 30th, 2008 3:30 pm ET

Read the article, folks. This was not an endorsement. Sheeesh! Way ta go, CNN, keep twistin!

steve o   January 30th, 2008 3:28 pm ET

I'm glad for any praise from the grandfather of the democratic party, he is a just man. When you think about it he is the only President that actually signed a peace treaty in the mideast, look at the fool Bush kissing the Saudi's king and prince's cheeks and begging for oil production to increase to help America. Then asking for a peace treaty to the closed minds of the people he helps more then American citizens.
Carter actually was a wonderful military man in the navy, Clinton was not a military man, and neither was RR, George senior was shot down as a naval flyer in ww2 and his son was a born again boozer in the air national guard.
Fema was started by President Carter and ruined under dubya. What I might be curious about how many homes Carter worked on with habitat for humanity, and how many homes are lost under a inhumane President Bush?
As far as Senator Clinton she may lose in running for President, she still has a job in the senate, it's the only place Bill can't turn into his own playboyground.

Henry n New York   January 30th, 2008 3:28 pm ET

When McCain got attached he lied to fight back; when Romney got attached he got pissed and it showed; when Edwards got attacked — oh he didn't; when Hillary got attacked SHE CRIED; when Obama got attacked HE SPOKE SO THAT THE TRUTH COULD BE REVEALED. The Clinton slime machine is good practice for the Republicans - we know how dirty they fight - they tought Bill.

YES WE CAN

YES WE CAN

YES WE CAN

YES WE CAN

YES WE CAN

YES WE CAN

Lynne   January 30th, 2008 3:27 pm ET

Lydia, you know NOT what you say.

Sam   January 30th, 2008 3:26 pm ET

Hillary is a farce. Bill was elected promising universal health care. The Congress was democratic. Eighty percent of the public was behind it. The economy could easily support it. Yet her program was 100% failure. She had another 6 years to try to revive it. Let's hear the excuse for 8 years of failure on her supposed pet program - when her husband was the president no less.

Now there's an election, she's promising you healthcare again just like Bill did - with an unworkable mandatory plan.

The theory is that if you can fool them once, you can always fool them. As Geffen says, "the Clintons lie with such ease, it's troubling". and the NY Times' William Safire called her a "congenital liar". Hillary flunked healthcare. She flunked Iraq. She flunked Iran. She even flunked the Washington bar exam twice. That's her record - her so-called experience. Vote Obama to get the job done.

Lynne   January 30th, 2008 3:25 pm ET

Oh Lydia, you know what you say. According, to you, even black people who criticize Obama are racists. As an educated black woman who has been in countless situations over the years where someone white has told me to my face that I am "different" from "regular" black people, I think I have a right to take offense when Obama is heaped with superlatives and compliments that paint him as the second coming. Regardless, I agree with you about the issues, which is why I suggested in my earlier post that we pay attention to the candidates platforms and not all this silliness about race and gender. WHat I find really funny about all this blogging is that people are taking such rigid positions of pro/con Hillary/Obama and the real truth is that on the issues they are quite similar. If we were to go down the list of issues from getting out of Iraq, to reproductive choice, both Hillary and Obama believe the same thing, they just have different plans to accomplish them and in my view different abilities in terms of navigating through Washington (which is a requirement for the job, even if we want Washington to "change"). I absolutely will support the Dem nominee, even if it is Obama and any Obama-supporters are utter fools not to do likewise if Hillary gets the nomination. Understand this, the Republicans, every one of them, including McCain (who is no moderate) will keep this country on the downhill path we are on, mired in wars, economy in a recession, and personal freedoms destroyed.

Go Democrats!

Whatever   January 30th, 2008 3:22 pm ET

Lynne and One Opinion: you are two sick puppies

Nathaniel Smith   January 30th, 2008 3:21 pm ET

Obama's vote did not send America cap in hand to China for funds to pay for a war that should never have been waged!
Barak's vision and plans to promote the best for education , industry and scientific research , will ensure that America will return to its rightful place as a nation of opportunity,peace and prosperity .

SA   January 30th, 2008 3:20 pm ET

Obama/Hillary would dominate the elections. Strong enough to cobat McCain. But there's too much anomosity between them to ever run together.

Obama '08

douadavid   January 30th, 2008 3:19 pm ET

Jimmy carter is among one of the worst former president of United States. He could not give any good advise to anyone. His legacy could not even compare to the worst president ,George w Bush. If Obama become a president , his administration will depends on his advisors so every thing will become black and white again so he will blame on racism for his problem. Vote fo Hillary is to eliminate all the problems that will face this nation in the future. Go Hillary.

Braineel   January 30th, 2008 3:18 pm ET

Carter too? Looks like another super delegate to me!

lc   January 30th, 2008 3:17 pm ET

Lynne-

So are you suggesting that those who vote for Obama have no brains? No brainers: The Kennedys, numerous governors, senators, congressmen, John Kerry, lawyers, students, professionals, hard working people across the nation etc… Or are only blacks not using their brains?

And why would you be "offended" because of one's choice to support Obama over Clinton? Your race should not matter. Your comments are just as lopsided as the NY NOW comments.

And how exactly is "Mrs. former President's wife" more qualified than any of the other candidates?

If you support Hillary great. But please do not use your race to downplay the educated choice of others, whether black or white, to express your non-factual and incorrect statements.

By the way, a poll taken at Yale, Clinton's alma mater, concluded that they too preferred Obama. But I guess you are offended by those no brainers as well.

Jon   January 30th, 2008 3:17 pm ET

With supporters like Jimmy Carter and Teddy "Chappaquiddick" Kennedy as supporters, who needs enemies! Carter needs to stick to building houses and helping the poor, thats what he's been good at. Good man, bad President. And be quiet about media bias toward any of the Dem candidates, because when it comes to the general election whichever Dem wins the nomination will walk on water as far as the media is concerned.

ADF   January 30th, 2008 3:16 pm ET

Let's face it everyone, race is an issue. Being a white guy living in MI, I must say the white guys currently in office have been horrible to say the least. Bush had a great opportunity and will leave a legacy as the worst President in US history (waging war is NOT pro-life by the way). Change is needed, and hopefully not from another white guy. Hopefully, super