January 31, 2008
Posted: 09:52 AM ET
Image from an Obama mailer sent out this week.
Image from an Obama mailer sent out this week.

(CNN) – In the hours leading up to Thursday night’s Democratic debate, Hillary Clinton’s staffers are ramping up recent accusations that rival Barack Obama’s team is engaged in negative campaigning.

In a conference call with reporters Wednesday afternoon, the Clinton camp pointed to direct mailings distributed by the Obama campaign in Connecticut that they said take a Clinton statement about her Iraq war vote out of context.

The Obama flier said the New York senator had admitted to voting in favor of the Iraq war despite the fact that she had not read an intelligence report that cast doubt on claims that Saddam Hussein’s government possessed weapons of mass destruction.

The Clinton campaign called the mailer misleading, saying only “a handful of senators” had read the report itself – and that most, like Clinton, had instead opted for a briefing by the report’s authors.

On Tuesday, the Clinton campaign highlighted another mailing sent by the Obama campaign. The North Dakota mail piece alleged that Hillary Clinton had once supported the North American Free Trade Agreement, but shifted her position to one of opposition as her presidential campaign began. The flier also claimed that she was too close to “lobbyists and special interests.”

Clinton’s team told reporters that Obama and his campaign had been “misquoting and misrepresenting Hillary's views on NAFTA for weeks,” and said that Obama himself had raised money from lobbyists in the past.

Accusations of negative campaigning have dominated the Democratic presidential campaign in recent weeks, with Obama accusing both Hillary Clinton and her husband, Bill Clinton, of engaging in unfair attacks. The Clinton campaign has made similar charges against the Illinois senator, saying Obama campaign trail statements, mailings and ads have distorted Clinton’s record.

UPDATE: A few hours before the CNN Democratic debate in Los Angeles, the Clinton team highlighted another negative mailer from the Obama campaign, this one attacking the Clinton health care plan. The mail piece said those who failed to purchase health insurance under the Clinton plan would be fined, a suggestion her campaign immediately dismissed as false.

–CNN Associate Political Editor Rebecca Sinderbrand

Filed under: Barack Obama • Hillary Clinton


Cate Keating   January 31st, 2008 2:45 pm ET

Hmm - I should probably bury somewhere deep in this comment that it is pro Hillary or it likely won't get posted - but here goes - let's see if there is still such a thing as free press . . . . of course he (Obama) is being two-faced and disengenuous - the can't wait to get the misrepresented truth out as he sees it - whether I like him or not doesn't forgive him for being a hypocrit - all of america better wake up and look to find the truth in this year's campaign - look what happened in 2000 when rhetoric alone won the election - you really can't afford 4 or 8 mores years of the same. . . it's time that experience and the ability to get a job done count - before it's too late for you all. . . Hillary in 08

Chanda, AL   January 31st, 2008 2:47 pm ET

Man, Obama is a total hypocrite. He slammed President Clinton for distorting his record and for negative attacks, and then he pulls this crap?

This is ridiculous behavior.

Prayu   January 31st, 2008 2:51 pm ET

Wow the debate tonight is gonna get -ugly-.

anonymous   January 31st, 2008 2:53 pm ET

Saying that someone didn't read something when they didn't read it is not negative campaigning.

Stephina   January 31st, 2008 2:54 pm ET

Obama has been the instigator behind all of the negative campaign tactics used in the Democratic race for nomination.

I'll take a Bush or Clinton anyday over Obama aka The Manchurian Candidate.

notmyconstit.   January 31st, 2008 2:54 pm ET

Nothing Obama does suprises me. He will stoop to any low ball trick to try to get the nomination. Unfortunately, CNN it so connected to Obama's hip, they will too.

Ray   January 31st, 2008 2:54 pm ET

wait for it..here it comes…Cry baby Obama and all his free press. 'I was misunderstood!"

Hillary!!!!!!

Al in Wpg   January 31st, 2008 2:55 pm ET

that doesn't seem like an attack at all… what's she crying about now?

Disenchanted   January 31st, 2008 2:55 pm ET

She didn't read the report. The flier said that she didn't read the report. How is this misleading? Because a lot other Senators didn't read it either? That makes her lack of doing so okay? That makes the flier misleading?

It amazes me just how much Clinton plays dirty politics in order to claim the other side is being dirty. No wonder I stopped being a Clinton supporter.

gene   January 31st, 2008 2:56 pm ET

I was against the Iran resolution, and was I too busy campaigning and I did not want to return to Washington for the vote. Needed that time to campaign in Iowa. I was against the Irag war and was not even in the senate at that time and I did not even know what was in the intelligence{would not make any difference and I would not understand it anyway] report. MY name is Obama and I am campaigning on "hope", I don't need facts to make a decision. Just hope!

cathy   January 31st, 2008 2:57 pm ET

Oh, now the Clintons don' t like it - but thats what they have been doing to Obama.

Looks good on ya Hill

Go Obama!!

independent 08   January 31st, 2008 2:58 pm ET

How can Hillary deny NAFTA when Bill was the one who signed it? Amazing that anyone can vote for a war without reading the intelligence report, I really cannot trust this woman with my security.

Watching Carefully   January 31st, 2008 3:09 pm ET

Obama has learned that he cannot win by being vague and fluffy. He has had to actually engage in campaigning and he's not very good at it. He is two-faced and inexperienced. Hillary Clinton is so much more prepared for what will come in November than this guy.

d   January 31st, 2008 3:19 pm ET

The media supports Obama…. they are afraid to attack as Al Sharton will be down on them. I'm voting for Hilliary. Obama 'bambee' is a sissy .. thinks he can knock down a lady. Go home to your little children !! Little ones are calling for their daddy!

Johnny   January 31st, 2008 3:19 pm ET

She who has been so negative for her entire campaign is getting a taste of her own medicine. How does it taste, Hillary?

Glenn Doty, Columbia, SC   January 31st, 2008 3:21 pm ET

So basically she states that the ads were untrue, and CNN doesn't bother to determine the veracity.

The Clinton attacks against Obama, which totalled hundreds upon hundreds, were PROVEN to be false by the Obama campaign…

These, Hillary simply STATED were false (and we're to believe that she didn't support NAFTA? Or the statement that she supported the war and didn't read the Inteligence report isn't true because other senators didn't read it either?)

I think that if someone wants to cry foul they can… but if one side provides PROOF, while the other side merely STATES that the attacks are false or misleading…
The denials shouldn't be reported in the same mannor

charlotte   January 31st, 2008 3:22 pm ET

Where was future man, when they vote on Iran?
He was out preaching, yes we can, yes we can.

When important issues are at hand,
Where pray tell is future man?

While a senator in the Illinois State Senate,
He vote present and he meant it.

Leave nothing to come back on him,
Just don't vote, the future man.

Now he wants to be our President,
Or merely just the resident.

We deserve more then he will do,
With a let someone else do it attitude.

Feel good words are really nice,
But can we afford to pay the price.

Chris, Orlando, FL   January 31st, 2008 3:22 pm ET

What a slimeball Obama is. That guy's a ventriloquist, I tell you. It amazes me how so many misguided Americans can support this guy. Everyone engages in some form of unflattering politics… that's the nature of the beast. But to proclaim that he's above that, and then turn around and send out rubbish like this… that's disgraceful.

Monte Brown, New York, NY   January 31st, 2008 3:23 pm ET

Obama can only attack Hillary with demagoguery because he can’t beat Hillary on the issues. Americans are not beat for the bull. We want our country back and we will get it with Hillary.

JB Hull, IA   January 31st, 2008 3:23 pm ET

um, is this actually being sent out by the obama campaign or not? I see no statements from the obama campaign, and those graphics don't look like something a professional campaign would produce… is obama actually sending these out, or are they third party mailers that Clinton is saying come from obama? There's a big difference (remember some of the nonesense in south carolina with third groups going after mccain and romney)

Christian, Tampa FL   January 31st, 2008 3:30 pm ET

Well, at least they picked a relatively nice picture of her. They could've picked a much more unflattering image.

That being said, though I support Obama, I don't like seeing this kind of thing. Unforunately, it seems that once a campaign becomes so enormous, these things tend to happen more often.

Bob, NY   January 31st, 2008 3:30 pm ET

Who signed NAFTA?

==> Hillary's 35yrs of experience??

Damian   January 31st, 2008 3:30 pm ET

Obama's been waging a subversive war of words against Mrs. Clinton since the beginning of last summer, so this is no surprise. He's now at least becoming known for saying one thing and doing another.

Bob, NY   January 31st, 2008 3:31 pm ET

How do the Clintons define "mandated healthcare"??

rekha   January 31st, 2008 3:33 pm ET

There seems to be a double standard when it comes to discussing ve- capaigning where it seems the US Press, Obama's campaign & the Republicans can say whatever the hell they like about Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton & former President Clinton, unprovoked or provoked, yet whatever the Clinton campaign or supporteers say is always so heavily scrutinised & most of the time everything is taken out of context with ve- spin addeed, & any rightfully called attacks that had been dealt with months ago are repeated by rivalling campaigns and the media again & again. I only care about the issues. But as the Obama campaign is mainly about demonstrating "new politics", then 1st of all he should be held to the same standard, 2nd of all he should've acknowlaged & denounced that he & the Republicans have benifited from the politics of personal destruction practised against his opponent if he trully belived in that message. I don't feel comfortable with him being President yet as the American press, public & politicians don't appear to feel comfortable in openly expressing how they disagree with him on issues, or policies without it being labelled a personal attack hence they'd be reluctant to share their opposing oppinion. After Bush, I personally feel as someone from the UK I need a US President that I feel comfortable in expressing my disagreements & offer constructive critism to, as US has a large influence on our foreign policy & Bush virtually dictated the UK's foreign policy.

Justin   January 31st, 2008 3:33 pm ET

If she can give it she should certainly be able to take it. Let her respond to the accusations, but don't act like Obama is horrible for pointing out her flaws. It's part of the campaign. I wouldn't call them "negative," though, just "points." Just like when she and her husband verbally criticized Obama, he responded. That's how this whole thing works. I'd like it if it didn't exist, but it does and isn't going away.

Aj   January 31st, 2008 3:33 pm ET

Let's see… it takes TWO Clintons to attack ONE Obama… name recognition seized your victory in FL…. it's apparent, by now, that the Clinton trademark does NOT discriminate. A VOTE for Hill is a VOTE for Bill who did, indeed, sign the NAFTA agreement in 1993.

Obama '08!!!

Mia, Stafford, VA   January 31st, 2008 3:34 pm ET

PEOPLE - pointing out difference accurately is not negative attacks- FACTS ARE FACTS - and that goes both ways for HRC or Obama

gerri   January 31st, 2008 3:34 pm ET

Well what a shame she was taken out of context like that! Please. She has nothing to complain about. They have been mis-quoting this guy since before he even came out of the room. Well, I guess it is not all politics afterall huh Hillary, Bill, James C.?

AHHH, so she just discovered the shoe doesn't fit so nice on the other foot!

Now she knows how it feels to take someones statements out of context. However, those are things she herself have said. Before she denies them, she should check the transcripts of Meet The Press. The words came out of her mouth regarding that Iraq vote statement, the NIE report. And she herself admitted to liking some parts of NAFTA.

This is what I don't like about her, anything she does to disadvantage someone else is fair game. But as soon she is disadvantaged, it's no longer fair game. It's time to complain.

Danny, San Diego, CA   January 31st, 2008 3:34 pm ET

It is a disservice to our country that CNN is reporting these kinds of innuendos from the Clinton campaign.

I wouldn't be surprised that Clinton's campaign was responsible for these ads themselves to make Obama look bad.

The Obama campaign from time and time again has taken the high road and not engage in personal attack ads. We saw in the last debate on how Clinton would sling mud on Obama just to get elected.

Obama has been speaking about change and people are listening. He should vote for Obama. Experience is nothing. We need somebody who is fresh and give a new perspective on government.

Dale   January 31st, 2008 3:34 pm ET

I am glade to see that other have watched how much attention CNN has given obAMa. It looks to me they are already to declar him president now. CNN can't the american people make the choice. No each moment hour day CNN Is electing their canadite.

R   January 31st, 2008 3:34 pm ET

JB Hull is the only one here ( besides me ) making sence, all of the others are just Hillary's puppets, who just argue that she has more experience. hillary has been in the senate for 8 years, how does that makes her more presidential than anyone, how will she argue to mccain, since he has more experience than her, and voted just like him for the war??? Obama has conviction and almost the same experience as Hillary, so please stop your ignorant comments

Karen, Florida   January 31st, 2008 3:34 pm ET

Sooner or later Obama's true colors were going to come shining through. At least it happened before Super Tuesday, than after (God help us) he becomes the candidate. Pledges a cleaner campaign and WHAM turns right around and shows how he can lie with the best of them. Me thinks the golden boy is beginning to show he's just gold-plated.

Jayhawk34   January 31st, 2008 3:35 pm ET

Regarding Clinton's health care plan:
How could her campaign say that fining citizens for failure to purchase the insurance is a lie!! The fact that EVERY American is required to pay in her plan is the clear distinction between the bill of Obama, which provides the option of deferral.

romeo   January 31st, 2008 3:35 pm ET

OBAMA for president !!! sorry all you haters! ahahahhhhhhhhh

adam   January 31st, 2008 3:35 pm ET

first of all, it wasn't barack obama but his campaign that attacked hilary. hilary is in the driving seat but obama really is closing in on her. it seems that both campaigns are exchanging attacks. but let me remind you, it was the clinton's that was using negative remarks about obama for the last month.
i was deciding to vote for clinton in the beggining of the primaries but now i'm voting for obama. its not that i hate hilary but her husband. if he keeps talking crap about obama he will lose hilary the election.
people should watch obama's speeches because they are truly outstanding. words do make a difference hilary and his words can inspire people in the united states to get best out of themselves. it has worked in the past because look at Franklin D. Roosevelt words which helped the nation during world war 2. this country can get back on its feet and they could do that with barack obama as president.

wakethehellup!!!!!   January 31st, 2008 3:35 pm ET

All I am going to say is Hillary will mop the floor with Obama tonight at the debate. I really wish America would wake up before it's too late. Obama will be another loser in office just like GW. I am all for Change and Hope, however change is Hillary (woman) Obama is all HOPE and that won't stop our enemies. He says he the future but all these old dogs are stumping for him Obama just want to win just like Hillary if not more. Another thing why are more black leaders supporting Hillary over Obama, I know because blacks can read through this BS. As for the blacks who are jumping on this bandwagon what has your brother Obama done for you lately nothing. You better believe when he get into office you will be an after thought to him.

P.S this coming from someone black.

Aj   January 31st, 2008 3:36 pm ET

u make a good point JB.

Carla from Canada   January 31st, 2008 3:36 pm ET

Since Obama has no clear platforms or policies on absolutely anything, and no experience internationally, he's making up for his own lack of credibility by using the oldest political trick in the books - focus on making the other party look wrong. He started the attacks and since he has nothing solid to offer, wants to keep it that way. The $32M - his 'friend' has been hoarding and saving all her life for the opportunity to be first lady, surrogate or otherwise.

gollygee   January 31st, 2008 3:36 pm ET

Why isn't he chastised by his old boy (Kerry and Kennedy) advisors . He'll just lie like he always does. All he does is make inaccurate slams about the past but for the future he just says Hope. Hillary knows what has to be done and how to do it. Obama hasn't a chance to improve the reputation of the USA in the rest of the world. They'll think Americans are idiots like they have since 2000 for voting for Bush instead of Gore. The Clintons are loved and respected world wide

observer   January 31st, 2008 3:37 pm ET

This "chanter" man is bad news! I read an interesting article that stated Obama was 1of only 3 votes AGAINST making it a crime to be on probation or bail and continue to "socialize" with known street gangs. He's really going to make our cities and towns safe for the people, right? I don't trust him and I don't believe his "we are one people" hoop-la, mumble jumble. In the Fla. election, Hillary PROVED she is the candidate that can beat McCain, she got right at 200,000 more votes than McCain. Obama did not beat McCain in Fla. I am not a fan of McCain or any of the other Republicians but I don't fall for the Obama message and if he should win the nomination, I cannot stand behind him. I am very , very leery of Obama.

Mimi Penaranda   January 31st, 2008 3:38 pm ET

HRC: Don't worry. Their negative ads won't faze somebody who knows the truth and tonight it will again come out. BO is obviously trained to speak like a preacher but not to debate, argue and discuss issues like a true leader should. I suggest that every time he stammers or blurts out a response on an issue, you should tell him to go sit in a corner and do time out! Also, I suggest that an HRC banner should read: BO: EAT MY DUST!!!

HILLARY!!! ALL!!! THE!!! WAY!!!

CDR   January 31st, 2008 3:38 pm ET

You really can't argue with the truth. The information contained in the flyers is true. People deserve to know where the candidates stand. Many are still waiting for Hillary to outline her experience resume with something other than First Lady. Both candidates are capable I believe but I do think that one would do a better job over the other because the other(HRC) lacks the ability to unify and build consensus.

Only one (Obama) has shown the ability to inspire the Nation toward a United America where we all have common interests. Only one can create the atmosphere where our divider leaders are willing to work together in the interests of the people and not special interests groups. Only one is truly for the people.

America prefers to hear our leaders debate the issues that affect the nation as opposed the issues that affect themselves. Each candidate presents a better option than the present and the question as to who can better restore our Nation's Unity and Greatness is a valid one and the truth speaks volumes. The American people are entitled to the Truh.

-CDR

Bev, PA   January 31st, 2008 3:39 pm ET

JB Hull, these mailings were distributed by the Obama campaign.

This is just another example of the Obama's hypocrisy. He's a fake. And the press just lets him get away with it. If Clinton had sent out a negative mailer, they'd be yelling from the rafters.

gerri   January 31st, 2008 3:39 pm ET

should read she's been misquoting his since before he came out of the womb.

Where you Clinton backers outraged when she did it to him? Then don't complain now then. Fair is fair, like it or not. She started it he can engage her if he wants.

Grow up. This isn't Hillary World where only she is allowed to do what she wants and get away with it. You people are hypocrites and pathetic.

Lucas, Nashville TN   January 31st, 2008 3:40 pm ET

Well, since the detractors either can't form coherent sentences or cannot spell… let me be the first to point out that it's HILLARY who cannot seem to win without fighting dirty. It's HILLARY who cries her way to sympathy from people who alter vote for Obama anyway. It's HILLARY who had operatives do crooked things that she can later deny (like the ads in Florida or these sub-standard mailers).

I'm not swayed in the least.

You think we can't overcome the Clinton Machine(tm)?

YES WE CAN.

Trust   January 31st, 2008 3:42 pm ET

Another DOUBLE STANDARD by Obama.

I'm really sickening by this double standard behavior.

v.ananthan   January 31st, 2008 3:42 pm ET

OBAMA IS BAD LOOSER !!!!!!!!!!!!

Art H   January 31st, 2008 3:44 pm ET

Aha, so finally the Obama campaign is heating up the campaign with negative attacks. I guess when attacks begin, it is a sure-fire sign that they are falling behind and need to play catch-up.

A J G   January 31st, 2008 3:45 pm ET

Here is hillarys chance to look obama in the eye and say I DONT HAVE TO ANSWER TO YOUR LIES I AM RUNNING FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.
She should then speak about how she will change america and keep it positive.
Obama is trying to throw her off with untrue allegations . She needs to ignore him. He is a great speaker-preacher (depending on the racial makeup of the crowd) but he does not define what he will do in detail. It is all inspirational and no substance. The one area i would get with him about is the fact he was not a senator when they voted for the iraq war. How can he say he was against something that he had no say in. But only if he brought it up which i suspect he will.

Alice in Florida   January 31st, 2008 3:45 pm ET

Hilllary Supporters:

Send an email to the DNC protesting their bone-headed move to not allow Florida's and Michigan's votes to count. If Florida's and Michigan's delegates were counted, Obama would be where he belongs. On the bottom.

I bet if they get enough emails from angry Democrats, they'll overturn their crazy decision.

Thanks! I've already sent mine.

James   January 31st, 2008 3:48 pm ET

WHAT NOT TRUE ABOUT THE AD?. IT IS A FACT THAT SHE VOTED FOR THE WAR. SHE ADMITTED SHE DIDNT REVIEW THE INTELLIGENCE REPORT! SHE WAS ADAMANTLY FOR NAFTA !!!!! I think that is a fair contrast.

Diane   January 31st, 2008 3:54 pm ET

this is why we need hillary in office. we need a WOMAN!

bob, IOWA   January 31st, 2008 3:54 pm ET

I would vote for Hillary if she would divorce Bill. I am concerned about Slick Willy in the White House with absolutely nothing to do this time. Im sure a speak for many White House interns.

Dar   January 31st, 2008 3:56 pm ET

If Obama gets the democratic nomination, I'm voting for McCain.

ashley   January 31st, 2008 3:56 pm ET

Why does this not suprise me?

I am a Hillary Clinton supporter, and frankly I do not like Barak Obama and his supporters - they remind me a little too much of Bush and his supporters in the 2000 and 2004 election. But I hate the negative campaigning, the dis-enfranchising of Florida voters, and the dis-enfranchising of the Democratic base in this negative battle that leaves both candidates vulnerable to the Republican party in the general election. Moreover, I have complete confidence that if Obama looses the majority democratic vote, but retains a larger number of delegates absent the delegates from Florida and Michigan, he will prove he is a "uniter" by refusing to seat those delegates, and insisting he is the rightful winner of the primary and the democratic nominee. All I know is that when George Bush did that it sure brought the country together!!!!!

TJ, Hoboken, NJ   January 31st, 2008 3:56 pm ET

I'm beginning to rethink my admiration of Obama. His campaign is doing EXACTLY what they derided the Clintons for doing. He has stopped talking about his positions and now presenting his interpretation of Hillary's positions on issues. Seriously with such fake candidates like Clinton and Romney and now even Obama, I think McCain is the only person of character left… Even though I don't agree with him on many issues (Iraq War) at least you know he means what he says.. But I'm very disappointed with the behavior of both Democratic party candidates!

Rarignac   January 31st, 2008 3:58 pm ET

There is nothing misleading in any of the information Clinton is objecting to. She admitted to not reading the intelligence reports, she fully supported NAFTA, and she mandates that everyone must buy in to her healthcare program. It seems that what The Clintons object to is the truth. At least, in a way, that's consistent with the lies they tell.

Tyler in Raleigh   January 31st, 2008 3:59 pm ET

I dont support negative attacks… but isnt this what the Clintons call "highlighting differences"??

Where is the attack?

He points out the facts that she voted for the Iraq war. She admits she did not read the report, just the briefs. The fac that otehr Senators are as bad as her is no better. So if you kill or steal its okay if "everyone else was doing it"??

Mr. Clinton signed NAFTA. The Clintons both supported it…. so whats wrong with stating that fact?? Is stating where you differ from a rival an attack?

Clinton also mandates health care…. if there is no fine or penalty for not following her mandate (which means forced participation) then how is it a mandate?

Now if Obama sent out a mailer saying you cant vote for a woman to be president, or of course she will win becuase women will all vote for women and there are more women then men (the logic Bill Clinton used to dismiss the SC loss) then that is racist, ignorant and wrong.

If he makes up stories or lies about the facts (again, like Bill Clinton does) then that is wrong. Obama gets hit when he points out the truth… when Hillary does it she cries and we have to give her sympathy. When Bill does it, we shouldn't count it cause he is above the law and not the candidate. Nice how the rules do not apply if your name is Bush or Clinton.

nccole treadway   January 31st, 2008 4:04 pm ET

Come on folks- WHO VOTED FOR THE WAR? Than said sorry I didn't mean it===========OOps maybe good old Bill can put a real good spin on that! Than after all Obama doesn't have the experience does he? Yet out of all of them running for President he voted AGAINST THE WAR? WHY YOU SAY? mAYBE IT'S BECAUSE HE ACTUALLY READ THE REPORTS, AND WAS CORRECT ABOUT THERE NOT BEING A CRISIS'S TO THE UNITED STATES, IT'S PEOPLE OR THE CAUSE OF 9/11! And YOU SAY WHO will be a tough,truethful, honest,decent and protective leader for the Unilted States? Maybe you better get ready, because Nuclear Iran is next to us saying WE CAN FOOL THIS LADY—GO HILLARY—OOOPS ———–THERE GOES BILL AGAIN, SAYING IT'S NOT HILLARYS FAULT!

Ron, TX   January 31st, 2008 4:06 pm ET

Clinton is a big fat hypocrit. She didn't seem to have a problem with mailers when she was blatantly falsifying Obama's positions on abortion and Yucca mountain.

At least Obama's "negative" mailers are accurate.

AISHA   January 31st, 2008 4:12 pm ET

35 YRS OF EXPERIENCE ……..I THINK SHE IS COUNTING IT AS A LAWYER ,OR FIRST LADY ,OR SOMETIMES WORKING FOR SOME WOMEN AND CHILDREN FOUNDATION ,,,,,,,AND MAY BE OVER ALL THE WHOLE TIME SHE IS EXPOSED IN DEALING WITH PEOPLE AND POLITICS

Richard   January 31st, 2008 4:20 pm ET

The Clintons learn that negative campaigning can actually hurt rather than help e.g. South Carolina.

Then miracles of miracles, the Clinton campaign begins listing examples of "negative ads" from the Obama campaign.

How can anyone believe either Bill, Hillary, or "her" campaign?

I supported Bill and Hillary up to two weeks ago. Now, I wish that they would just take their new found wealth from uranium rights and retire. Bah!

Murry   January 31st, 2008 4:20 pm ET

How is this ad a vicious attack on Hillary? She has been taking credit for husband's work throughout the campaign and now she wants to distance herself from NAFTA?
CNN, let's keep them honest here.

Voters everywhere, vote for the candidate that 'thinks different' not 'thinks Washington'

Go Obama!!

Mae   January 31st, 2008 4:25 pm ET

He is the most Liberal Senator than anyone in the Senate, no foreign policy experience, can't make a decision, plays dirty politics, takes money from a man connected with Iraq, who is now jailed w/o bond and you are waving hurrah, help us all! You think the last eight years have been bad, chest up it's going to be a rough four years. Let's see you wave haurrah then.

Demi, OKLAHOMA   January 31st, 2008 4:28 pm ET

Negative ads work bc people (even very smart people) don't seem to take the time to read the plans candidates have for after they are elected. We all need to stop depending on mailers like these and the media and make our own decisions!!

I was on the fence until Iowa and really read a great deal from each camp. I'm choosing Hillary. I like Obama and love his speeches - I just need tangible ideas not fluff. I hope he is the VP.

T Peck   January 31st, 2008 4:28 pm ET

Notice that the accusation is not that they information isn't true, but more that Obama is engaging in negative attacks. What happened to the politics of hope? Well, the politics of hope don't mean that opponents are immunized from any challenge or criticism.

btw, hop over to MSNBC to check out Bill's latest corruption scandal. Seriously folks, enough is enough.

Mike   January 31st, 2008 4:28 pm ET

Eventually you people will wake up to the fact that the Clinton’s keep pulling the same old tactics before each primary. Hillary hasn’t begun to be scrutinized, just wait till the Republicans begin in on her. Everything thus far has been a walk in the park for her so just keep relying on every word they say to be true.
By the way I have not seen anything on here today about the following New York Times article published today.
An Ex-President, a Mining Deal and a Big Donor
A Canadian financier who traveled to Kazakhstan with Bill Clinton and won a big mining deal later donated millions to Mr. Clinton’s charitable foundation.

I guess the Clinton’s made out quite ok with this little deal while he was in office working for the American citizens just as Bill will make out like a champ on his Dubai 20 million dollar deal.

Susan - NY   January 31st, 2008 4:33 pm ET

As a woman I found it awful that Hillary C. is unable to stand behind her statements and hides behinds being a woman. She is always taken out of context or misunderstood or being the victim. She is the most untruthful candidate I have ever met. Some of her ideas are quite good, but I don't beleive they are her ideas or platforms. Since she is so dishonest as an individual, as is her husband, the Clintons have no credibility with me.

The individual who stated the Clintons have to often "wishy/washed" on issues is so right! I say - They can not Defend their ideas because they probably stole them from someone else ! deny and distort is what they have always done from day one — 8yrs of this …… do we need more

This Voter will trust in my gut —- Barack Obama for President, Please!

AJ, IL   January 31st, 2008 4:54 pm ET

All you presidential supporters! Know this! Both Obama and Hillary are lawyers by trade. Both rely on economic advisers, business advisers, foreign policy advisers, and technology advisers. Somehow these hardcore Hillary supporters think that Hillary has all the solutions, just because Hillary throws out a few policy words, questionable statistics and organization names. It doesn't matter how many solutions Hillary touts, if she can't get them past Congress which has demonstrated in the past, she's an empty dre…ehh…I mean suit.

Tom Z, Florida   January 31st, 2008 5:06 pm ET

Hmmmm. Not to be racist, but isn't this the pot calling the kettle black?

cheryl Arizona   January 31st, 2008 5:07 pm ET

Thats all Obama has been doing the last week is attack Hillary. Maybe its because he has nothing to say about what he will do. He is where he is because the media has made him a rock star. They were unfair to John Edwards with coverage and did nothing but attack Hillary. Every organization that did a study on media coverage has said there is media bias in regards to Obama. What a way to pick a president. I hope the american voters will demand more from the media on covering the issues instead of trying to create disagreements amongst the candidates which serve no purpose but to make us look like idiots to other countries.

Alonzo Demetrius   January 31st, 2008 5:08 pm ET

Tell it like it is, Obama. What a disaster this country would find ourselves in were she to become president.

tomdavie   January 31st, 2008 5:12 pm ET

For those obama lovers who think these attack ads are fake.

Go to ABC MSNBC USA today and see that Obama has been on an offensive RAMPAGE in the last couple of days. Attacking clinton in his speeches and distorting her record.

This is all fun and games, but what GALLS me the most is when the Clintons did it to Obama , he WHINED AND COMPLAINED. He called it DIRTY POLITICS. He got his 'big brothers' Clyburn , Kerry, and Kennedy to SCOLD the Clintons.

Then, unbelievably, he is now DOING THIS HIMSELF. And YES, voters see this. I think its a mistake by the obama campaign.

Think about it. After all the media bashing against the Clintons , and Obama crying the blues that he was savagely attacked, voters open up their newspapers to find Senator Obama on the ATTACK.

??????

lol.

Sam   January 31st, 2008 5:16 pm ET

Correct, the Clinton camp is not saying the accusations are not true.

Different from their attack on Obama in which the accusations were false.

NAFTA was real, it is not a lie. Her Wal-Mart work that was against unions was also real, it is not a lie.

The Clintons are upset at the truth. They are the anti-truth.

SAM   January 31st, 2008 5:17 pm ET

Now we know who's telling the truth , Since the beginning of the campaign Obama and Edwards is bashing Sen.Clinton about lobbyist and special interest issues .Obama deny this for 3 months that he has no lobbyist or special interests working and supporting him. The worst thing is one of them is RESKO which he admit as a friend and supporter for 20 years.Obama help this crook landlord who cut electrical power of helpless tenants and TOOK RESKOS CAMPAIGN MONEY AND PROMISE TO RETURN IT WHEN REPORTED. Now you wanna believe this candidate to stand for little people shame on you and wake up AMERICA dont be fooled by this sweet talker and orator who tried and keep pressing division ,unity and change when he has mediocre experience.Theres nothing to unite its 2008 if you are a good leader and you have a good cause American people will unite and help even if you are black or white republicans asians latinos or any race.Obama should stop igniting division or unity.theres no segregation there is no inequality we are not in 1960 or 1970's ,It's 2008 the important is the economy and how can we pay our houses and national debt. American voters are intelligent and they will choose the right candidate for president who has credility ,trustworthy and honest.

Sal in Phoenix   January 31st, 2008 5:17 pm ET

Obama is a cry-baby and a two faced back stabber..

Obama-Edwards 2008!   January 31st, 2008 5:18 pm ET

Clinton's words/lies taste very bitter in her own mouth! Enjoy, Seconds anyone?

pam,s.c.   January 31st, 2008 5:19 pm ET

today the new york times has an interesting investigative article on bill today. hey wolf ask hillary why bill will not disclose the donors to his presidential library. also you organized labor people see abc's investigative report on hillary and wal-mart's stance on organized labor. i think before this is over alot more will be coming out about not only hillary but bill. i think the above mentioned fliers pales in comparison to what the clintons did to barack in s.c.

K   January 31st, 2008 5:21 pm ET

I was an undecided Democrat in CT until this week…no longer. The Obama campaign made the decision for me–Hillary '08.
Within the space of 3 days I received 3 political flyers, 2 from the Obama campaign ("paid for by Obama for America") and one from the Clinton campaign. The one from the Clinton camapaign lists the issues for which Senator Clinton stands and her position on those issues and makes no mention of Senator Obama. The 2 from the Obama campaign are each 3 pages of negative attacks against Senator Clinton, reframing and recharacterizing several of her issues with no independent substantiation for the claims and no explanation of Senator Obama's position on any issue, although the text directs me to go to his website to "read his plans". Rhetoric with no substance and negative attacks from the Obama campaign, clearly he doesn't practice what he preaches.

charlotte   January 31st, 2008 5:21 pm ET

Barack Obama, where's your mother? She should know you best, why isn't she campaigning for her son. Is she still alive? I never even seen a picture is he ashamed of his white blood. Anybody but me wondering?

observer   January 31st, 2008 5:24 pm ET

love these who suggest that HRC's campaign mailed those e-mails to make Obama looks bad. Fantastic! Obama really is the saint of our time, I guess. Someone may say here be aware of the prophets.

James   January 31st, 2008 5:25 pm ET

Name two of Bill Clinton's biggest accompishments?

1) Losing the Democrats control of Congress
2) Nearly getting himself impeached over one of the most stupid reasons imaginable. Lying? He IS a politician, people.

You have to admit it, the Clintons have been the most divisive politicians in the modern era, with the shortest "coat-tails". If Hillary is nominated, I think we have to say bye-bye to control of Congress.

Bryce K.   January 31st, 2008 5:30 pm ET

One notice how similar the Obama is trying to "swift-boat" Hillary! The Obama people seem to have leaned a lot from the Bush's.

Note: If Hillary confronts Obama its reported as being racist in the Press and on CNN. The Clintons can't even mention Jesse or Al or Martin people they have supported for years in public office, no if they do they are trying to make Obama the "Black Candidate" the truth is he is Black and i don't think anyone forgot or need the clintions to point it out… this is just unfair and vile, and as a Blackman i don't like it and I am voting for Hillary. Obama is the one using race to attempt a win.

But if Obama attacks hillary its frontpage news and gleeful reporting by the Press…. This is not fair…

Wolf need's to ask Obama tonight "Where is the Beef" while clinton has substance, debt and history, Obama gives good speeches, like the ad said "where is the beef"

Hillary 08′

Mike   January 31st, 2008 5:39 pm ET

Independant 08:

What does Bill signing NAFTA have anything to do with Hillary? Are you saying whatever Bill does Hillary has to agree? Hmmmm

Leonardo   January 31st, 2008 5:45 pm ET

Does America need to be reminded that it was the impeachment of Bill Clinton that gave us 8 diasatrous years of George W. Bush?

An Agnostic Democrat   January 31st, 2008 5:55 pm ET

tomdavie:

Attack? Not so much! Truth! Even the MSM is finally questioning Hillary's loooong history with telling the truth. Funny thing is you never see the word truth and the name Clinton in the same sentence. H'mm …

Go hilary   January 31st, 2008 6:08 pm ET

Obama is a loser. He will not win. HILARY 08!

Pam -, Arkport, NY   January 31st, 2008 6:26 pm ET

Why sending E-mail that states it is from Teddy Kennedy's E-mail address when it is secretly from Obama campaign.

Teddy Kennedy's staff in Washington DC have E-mailed me in the past and when I went to answer the E-mail it came up not Senator Kennedy, but Obama campaign. This is Cheap, Low, Fake, and Unethical.

rascaldem   January 31st, 2008 6:43 pm ET

So Hillary negative attacks Obama for a month straight and now she's whining about Obama attacking her? Poor Hillary. Wahhhh!

Russel, NC   January 31st, 2008 6:44 pm ET

Talk about negative camaigning. Hillary has a negative tone to her voice.

brian, nj   January 31st, 2008 6:46 pm ET

i don't see any problem in mr. obama pointing out some of hillary's issues that differ from his. the clinton's can somehow attack for weeks with little stir, but as soon as obama wants to set clear distinctions between himself and THE clinton's, everyone is down his throat.

SALLY   January 31st, 2008 7:20 pm ET

I'm surprised Obama is receiving support from Democrats who are not on his staff and are in their right minds, when his campaign platform is just like Hillary Clinton's and we've never had a woman President. Why vote for another man over Hillary Clinton? I'm especially surprised by the Democratic women voters who are supporting Obama instead of Hillary. Shame on you!

denise   January 31st, 2008 7:25 pm ET

I find it funny that Hillary cannot touch Obama with negative campaigning ads, remarks or anything without Obama wining about it and the media backing it up and sensationalizing it. It seems Obama gets to say whatever he chooses

jerry   January 31st, 2008 7:26 pm ET

i dont know how old some of you are….but i was working a lower paying job under bill clinton now i make double but dont have a pot to welllllllllll out of.

Connie   January 31st, 2008 7:27 pm ET

Hillary and Bill need to vote for Obama…and rest their case!

What?   January 31st, 2008 7:34 pm ET

RON is an idiot! I cannot wait until your Obama Cult falls. What are you going to do then Ron? Hillary is going to win and thats the bottom line.

LEONARDO, Bill Clinton completed his eight years!! George Bust won against Al Gore. It wasn't Bill's impeachment that got George Bush into office. It was the people that voted for him that got him into office. By the way, CNN was the only news station that reported that incorrectly. "AL GORE WINS!!!!". That was so funny!! I will never forget that day. Obama is not going to win, the debate tonight will show that.

bdc, phila, pa   January 31st, 2008 8:06 pm ET

First of all, negative or not… isn't that stuff true? even if most senators didn't read the iraq report.. she still didn't read it either… she supported NAFTA.. and since her plan does mandate having health care doesn't that imply there would be a penalty? Isn't that what a mandate is? I will admit I haven't read the clinton plan but I have heard her call it a mandate herself…

If its negative but its the truth its fair game isn't it… just like the rezko thing?

Hillary is the queen of back-stabbing politics anyway..

i just really wish more people were objective and read these things critically instead of blindly typing "YOU GO GIRL" and "HILLARY 08″ while saying she's doesn't do this stuff… she's actually really hypocritical…

Frank   January 31st, 2008 8:52 pm ET

Hillary was great in the debate. Clearly the smartest of the two and with a deep understanding of all of the issues. She will be ready on day one to……Oh sorry. I miss read my instructions from Team Clinton. I should wait until the debate is over before I join others and flood the web sites with a positive spin. Someone please wake me when its time. Yawn.

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room. Download this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

Follow us on Twitter

CNN on TwitterGet Ticker updates the moment they appear online via the Web, SMS, or instant messages.
Follow politicalticker

Categories
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNN makes reasonable efforts to review all comments prior to posting and CNN may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2008 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com