<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: People meter: undecided Democratic voters weigh in</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/</link>
	<description>All politics, all the time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:07:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ness</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-452062</link>
		<dc:creator>ness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 02:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-452062</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t trust Hilary Clinton, no more than I do Bill Clinton. They both seem to be sneaky, and neither impress me in their quest for the white house. It&#039;s time for something refreshing, not anything we&#039;ve had in the past. Enough of the &quot;stale&quot; leadership. Besides she seems to boastful and proud, and her heart does not seem to be with the American people. It seems to be all about her, and for that I could care less. Obama, on the other hand, seems to have a genuine concern for the people, and his desire is to see America better off than it is today. As for the Clintons, they have a personal issue with the Bush family, and the way I see it, the Bushes will always have their foot on the Clintons&#039; necks. So get over it! We don&#039;t need anymore drama in the White House than there already is. We all know Hilary feels she has something to prove, because she were made to look like a fool on national tv, when her &quot;beloved&quot; husband were accused of extra marital affairs, as well as smoking pot. Now, he wants to pretend he&#039;s loyal and dedicated to her. Gimme a break!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't trust Hilary Clinton, no more than I do Bill Clinton. They both seem to be sneaky, and neither impress me in their quest for the white house. It's time for something refreshing, not anything we've had in the past. Enough of the "stale" leadership. Besides she seems to boastful and proud, and her heart does not seem to be with the American people. It seems to be all about her, and for that I could care less. Obama, on the other hand, seems to have a genuine concern for the people, and his desire is to see America better off than it is today. As for the Clintons, they have a personal issue with the Bush family, and the way I see it, the Bushes will always have their foot on the Clintons' necks. So get over it! We don't need anymore drama in the White House than there already is. We all know Hilary feels she has something to prove, because she were made to look like a fool on national tv, when her "beloved" husband were accused of extra marital affairs, as well as smoking pot. Now, he wants to pretend he's loyal and dedicated to her. Gimme a break!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charlotte</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-436937</link>
		<dc:creator>charlotte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-436937</guid>
		<description>Either one, is better than a Republican. Giving the fact that Congress was fed over 900 lies. The Iraq War vote was based on available information at the time. At least Hillary votes more than Obama. Missing 1/3 of the votes is unacceptable. Missing very important votes, ex: Iran. Where was Obama when that vote was taken? If he had of been a Senator at the time the Iraq Resolution was being voted on, who&#039;s to say he would have even been present to vote</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Either one, is better than a Republican. Giving the fact that Congress was fed over 900 lies. The Iraq War vote was based on available information at the time. At least Hillary votes more than Obama. Missing 1/3 of the votes is unacceptable. Missing very important votes, ex: Iran. Where was Obama when that vote was taken? If he had of been a Senator at the time the Iraq Resolution was being voted on, who's to say he would have even been present to vote</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Independent California Voter</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-432126</link>
		<dc:creator>Independent California Voter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 15:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-432126</guid>
		<description>no doubt .. BO was underwhelming .... HC came out as more organized in the delivery of her thoughts and understanding on the complexity of issues and what that implies for how problems need to be addressed and in how solutions need to be approached.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no doubt .. BO was underwhelming .... HC came out as more organized in the delivery of her thoughts and understanding on the complexity of issues and what that implies for how problems need to be addressed and in how solutions need to be approached.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: an independant</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-432087</link>
		<dc:creator>an independant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 15:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-432087</guid>
		<description>To people who want to bring on issues why Hillary Clinton vote &quot;yes&quot; in 2002, then listen carefully.  She clarified thoroughly yesterday that the vote is for a &quot;Resolution&quot; not &quot;going to war&quot; giving the information was given at the time and from intelligence gathered throughout during 90&#039;s.   US President need such resolution to weigh in against Terrorism regime during the time that america was under attack.   However america had a Bush who is so absessed to war and did not do his job in the best interest of America.  That is why Hillary regrets that if she knows what happend later, she would not.  

If people ask Hillary&#039;s judgement on Bush&#039;s capability to execute his role as president, then think about, US elected this president twice, why?.  That is a trust given by majority of US citizen.  When US faces a threat from outside, a US president need his own citizen&#039;s trust.  However it happens later that Bush misuse the trust given by US citizen and congress and senate house.   I believe Demacrats can use impeachment and will definitely throw Bush out of White House, but for sure Demacrats have strategy and priorities.  

Dem&#039;08</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To people who want to bring on issues why Hillary Clinton vote "yes" in 2002, then listen carefully.  She clarified thoroughly yesterday that the vote is for a "Resolution" not "going to war" giving the information was given at the time and from intelligence gathered throughout during 90's.   US President need such resolution to weigh in against Terrorism regime during the time that america was under attack.   However america had a Bush who is so absessed to war and did not do his job in the best interest of America.  That is why Hillary regrets that if she knows what happend later, she would not.  </p>
<p>If people ask Hillary's judgement on Bush's capability to execute his role as president, then think about, US elected this president twice, why?.  That is a trust given by majority of US citizen.  When US faces a threat from outside, a US president need his own citizen's trust.  However it happens later that Bush misuse the trust given by US citizen and congress and senate house.   I believe Demacrats can use impeachment and will definitely throw Bush out of White House, but for sure Demacrats have strategy and priorities.  </p>
<p>Dem'08</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-431762</link>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 15:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-431762</guid>
		<description>Hillary being attacked even by the moderator draws more sympathetic voters to her; I don&#039;t like seeing a woman attacked, without having Obama&#039;s Rezko and Giannoulias mob ties questioned.

And yes, I&#039;m from Chicago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary being attacked even by the moderator draws more sympathetic voters to her; I don't like seeing a woman attacked, without having Obama's Rezko and Giannoulias mob ties questioned.</p>
<p>And yes, I'm from Chicago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EJ</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-431585</link>
		<dc:creator>EJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 14:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-431585</guid>
		<description>Both candidates did well, but I give the edge to Obama and here&#039;s why. It is ridiculous to think that thinking on your feet has anything to do with the Presidency of the United States. The Commander in Chief makes thought out decisions (and yes, 43 thought about invading Iraq for a long time, however his thought process was flawed). No President has ever had to &quot;think on his feet&quot; except when talking to the media, but that has nothing to do with running a country. We need someone who is willing to make sound decisions and surround himself with people who will allow him to do that. The most important thing that was said during the debate was when Obama stated that  if and when he&#039;s the President, he&#039;ll surround himself (his Cabinet, etc.) with intelligent people, that may not necessarily agree with him &quot;because I am not right all the time&quot;, so that sound decisions could be made for the benefit of the country. THAT IS LEADERSHIP, first acknowledging that your ideas may not always be the best ideas. I think Mrs. Clinton still represents the &quot;go it alone&quot;, &quot;I will do what I want when I want because I think its right, let history be the judge&quot; politics, which is not good for the country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both candidates did well, but I give the edge to Obama and here's why. It is ridiculous to think that thinking on your feet has anything to do with the Presidency of the United States. The Commander in Chief makes thought out decisions (and yes, 43 thought about invading Iraq for a long time, however his thought process was flawed). No President has ever had to "think on his feet" except when talking to the media, but that has nothing to do with running a country. We need someone who is willing to make sound decisions and surround himself with people who will allow him to do that. The most important thing that was said during the debate was when Obama stated that  if and when he's the President, he'll surround himself (his Cabinet, etc.) with intelligent people, that may not necessarily agree with him "because I am not right all the time", so that sound decisions could be made for the benefit of the country. THAT IS LEADERSHIP, first acknowledging that your ideas may not always be the best ideas. I think Mrs. Clinton still represents the "go it alone", "I will do what I want when I want because I think its right, let history be the judge" politics, which is not good for the country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-431337</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 12:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-431337</guid>
		<description>Hillary clearly won.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary clearly won.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hickb</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-431220</link>
		<dc:creator>hickb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 10:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-431220</guid>
		<description>This was a nice, civil debate... both did really well tonight
From following the whole news &amp; media coverage for Obama &amp; Hillary campaigns since 2006, I think Obama has run a genuine and positive message.  Hillary has ran a more divisive message that changes strategically each week.  If people want real change in this country, they would vote for Ron Paul.  Obama is my 2nd choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a nice, civil debate... both did really well tonight<br />
From following the whole news &amp; media coverage for Obama &amp; Hillary campaigns since 2006, I think Obama has run a genuine and positive message.  Hillary has ran a more divisive message that changes strategically each week.  If people want real change in this country, they would vote for Ron Paul.  Obama is my 2nd choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jack11</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-431211</link>
		<dc:creator>jack11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 10:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-431211</guid>
		<description>I just don&#039;t see Obama as VP but presidential.  Maybe Obama / HIlary ticket might work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just don't see Obama as VP but presidential.  Maybe Obama / HIlary ticket might work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-431174</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 10:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-431174</guid>
		<description>if you can&#039;t say invader, at least say illegal alien

quit saying immigrant

there is a difference</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if you can't say invader, at least say illegal alien</p>
<p>quit saying immigrant</p>
<p>there is a difference</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald P</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-431160</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 09:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-431160</guid>
		<description>Oh, almost forgot... Hillary, like Bill will dodge every question, then coat thier answer with so much icing, you can&#039;t see the cake. Must we forget how many government officials were under scrutiny during the Clinton Administration...One things for sure, Bush lies, McCain Lies (Romney Iraq issue), the Clintons LIE (under oath).  

I need answers not politics and lies, GO BARACK GO!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, almost forgot... Hillary, like Bill will dodge every question, then coat thier answer with so much icing, you can't see the cake. Must we forget how many government officials were under scrutiny during the Clinton Administration...One things for sure, Bush lies, McCain Lies (Romney Iraq issue), the Clintons LIE (under oath).  </p>
<p>I need answers not politics and lies, GO BARACK GO!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald P</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-431148</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 09:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-431148</guid>
		<description>OBAMA O8! He clearly took her down on Iraq, and the future of our country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OBAMA O8! He clearly took her down on Iraq, and the future of our country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marie</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-431087</link>
		<dc:creator>Marie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 08:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-431087</guid>
		<description>Those two are too scarey for words. Our nation will certainly be in peril. The illegals will rule and the Islamo fascists will rule the Middle East as soon as they know the timetable. Where is the question on their pro-abortion stance? After all, our founding fathers held that &quot;Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness&quot; were the number one issues. It will be a sad day indeed if either Hillary or Obama become President. Just as I cried when Bill Clinton came into office, I will be very sad if either Hillary or Obama are elected to office. It will probably be another dirty tricks campaign as the primaries seem to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those two are too scarey for words. Our nation will certainly be in peril. The illegals will rule and the Islamo fascists will rule the Middle East as soon as they know the timetable. Where is the question on their pro-abortion stance? After all, our founding fathers held that "Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness" were the number one issues. It will be a sad day indeed if either Hillary or Obama become President. Just as I cried when Bill Clinton came into office, I will be very sad if either Hillary or Obama are elected to office. It will probably be another dirty tricks campaign as the primaries seem to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer, California</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-431085</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer, California</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 08:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-431085</guid>
		<description>Hillary is an unelectable candidate.  She&#039;s made too many enemies, and even the Democratic party is fiercely divided about Hillary.  There is just too much baggage.  I&#039;m not saying that&#039;s fair, it just is what it is.  

If you vote for Hillary on Tuesday, and she comes out as the democratic candidate, it will mean another four years minimum of this same craziness, as John McCain will be our next President.

Are democrats honestly ready for four more GOP years?  Four more years of kids getting killed in Iraq?  Four more years of spending trillions of dollars?  Throwing good money after bad?  Meanwhile, there would be no improved healthcare, minimul improved adherance to the constitution, and the VP he chooses has moderately good odds of slipping into the presidency?  The gridlock alone will become an institution!

Please think this vote through to the end.  Okay, you like Hillary.  I understand why, and agree with you on many points.  But whether we agree, or I like my candidate more than yours is irrelevent.

Please Hillary fans, we can&#039;t take this risk.  If Obama makes huge misteps, we can oust the man in four years, but if Hillary becomes the Dem candidate, then you KNOW what President McCain will do.  She can&#039;t win... PERIOD.  Even Hillary herself will not address this issue with a substantive answer (regarding her polarity)

Are you REALLY, TRULY willing to let that happen?  Another GOP President?  You are willing to take that risk?  Really?

Please look at the big picture, I beg you.  We ARE ready for a woman President, but Hillary Clinton is not that woman.  

Barack can win, he is electable, and if he goofs, we can fix the mistake and you get a HUGE &quot;I told you so.&quot;  But if you are wrong... we can&#039;t fix that and may lose this one opportunity to actually BE the greatest nation on earth once again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary is an unelectable candidate.  She's made too many enemies, and even the Democratic party is fiercely divided about Hillary.  There is just too much baggage.  I'm not saying that's fair, it just is what it is.  </p>
<p>If you vote for Hillary on Tuesday, and she comes out as the democratic candidate, it will mean another four years minimum of this same craziness, as John McCain will be our next President.</p>
<p>Are democrats honestly ready for four more GOP years?  Four more years of kids getting killed in Iraq?  Four more years of spending trillions of dollars?  Throwing good money after bad?  Meanwhile, there would be no improved healthcare, minimul improved adherance to the constitution, and the VP he chooses has moderately good odds of slipping into the presidency?  The gridlock alone will become an institution!</p>
<p>Please think this vote through to the end.  Okay, you like Hillary.  I understand why, and agree with you on many points.  But whether we agree, or I like my candidate more than yours is irrelevent.</p>
<p>Please Hillary fans, we can't take this risk.  If Obama makes huge misteps, we can oust the man in four years, but if Hillary becomes the Dem candidate, then you KNOW what President McCain will do.  She can't win... PERIOD.  Even Hillary herself will not address this issue with a substantive answer (regarding her polarity)</p>
<p>Are you REALLY, TRULY willing to let that happen?  Another GOP President?  You are willing to take that risk?  Really?</p>
<p>Please look at the big picture, I beg you.  We ARE ready for a woman President, but Hillary Clinton is not that woman.  </p>
<p>Barack can win, he is electable, and if he goofs, we can fix the mistake and you get a HUGE "I told you so."  But if you are wrong... we can't fix that and may lose this one opportunity to actually BE the greatest nation on earth once again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DW</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-430535</link>
		<dc:creator>DW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-430535</guid>
		<description>Other than the questions on healthcare and economics Hillary Clinton did not answer any questions. Sure she did a lot of talking, all around the question. She was totally evasive on the vast majority of the questions that were directly addressed to her. She was quick to responded to the answer that Obama gave to his questions but could not answer her own. She talked around practically ever question, much like our current president does. How anyone can say Hillary won the debate truly needs to go back and watch it again or read the transcript.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Other than the questions on healthcare and economics Hillary Clinton did not answer any questions. Sure she did a lot of talking, all around the question. She was totally evasive on the vast majority of the questions that were directly addressed to her. She was quick to responded to the answer that Obama gave to his questions but could not answer her own. She talked around practically ever question, much like our current president does. How anyone can say Hillary won the debate truly needs to go back and watch it again or read the transcript.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asians in Chicago for Obama</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-430534</link>
		<dc:creator>Asians in Chicago for Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-430534</guid>
		<description>Asians in chicago support Obama. Please folks disregard the first ignorant  writer. He doesn&#039;t speak for Asian Americans, and doen&#039;t seen to understand American politics.President Obama has been honest and straight forward from day one. He is smart and focus. Hillary and Bill lie for political purposes. Hillary collects money from Washington lobbyists, and flip flops on several issues.

Asian--Americans for Obama 08.!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Asians in chicago support Obama. Please folks disregard the first ignorant  writer. He doesn't speak for Asian Americans, and doen't seen to understand American politics.President Obama has been honest and straight forward from day one. He is smart and focus. Hillary and Bill lie for political purposes. Hillary collects money from Washington lobbyists, and flip flops on several issues.</p>
<p>Asian&#8211;Americans for Obama 08.!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bacusla</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-430526</link>
		<dc:creator>Bacusla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-430526</guid>
		<description>I HAVE JUST LEFT AN OBAMA&#039;08 GIG IN NORTHERN CALI &amp; I WISH EVERYONE HERE COULD HAVE BEEN THERE. THERE IS A GREAT WIND OF GENERATIONAL CHANGE BLOWING IN OUR POLITY &amp; NO AMOUNT OF PANDERING OR SPIN CAN SLOW THIS WAVE. AS YOU GO TO BED, START THE PROCESS OF RENEWING YOUR MIND TO RECEIVE A YOUNGER GENERATION INTO THE WHITE HOUSE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I HAVE JUST LEFT AN OBAMA'08 GIG IN NORTHERN CALI &amp; I WISH EVERYONE HERE COULD HAVE BEEN THERE. THERE IS A GREAT WIND OF GENERATIONAL CHANGE BLOWING IN OUR POLITY &amp; NO AMOUNT OF PANDERING OR SPIN CAN SLOW THIS WAVE. AS YOU GO TO BED, START THE PROCESS OF RENEWING YOUR MIND TO RECEIVE A YOUNGER GENERATION INTO THE WHITE HOUSE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MARYLOU JONES</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-430521</link>
		<dc:creator>MARYLOU JONES</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-430521</guid>
		<description>HILLARY CLINTON, NEXT PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES!  WOW!  SHE WAS RIGHT ON TONIGHT!  OBAMA IS JUST NOT READY YET.  GO HILLARY!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HILLARY CLINTON, NEXT PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES!  WOW!  SHE WAS RIGHT ON TONIGHT!  OBAMA IS JUST NOT READY YET.  GO HILLARY!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Genius</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-430477</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Genius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-430477</guid>
		<description>I watched the debate, and I feel Obama, is not the Man, He can&#039;t stand on his own two feet when it comes to debates, He&#039;s gotta Learn to lead not follow, Alot of Blacks in our town is voting for him only due to his color, WRONG, I want experince, I VOTE FOR HILLARY, If she can&#039;t do it No one can HILLARY HILLARY YEAHHHHHHHH HILLARY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched the debate, and I feel Obama, is not the Man, He can't stand on his own two feet when it comes to debates, He's gotta Learn to lead not follow, Alot of Blacks in our town is voting for him only due to his color, WRONG, I want experince, I VOTE FOR HILLARY, If she can't do it No one can HILLARY HILLARY YEAHHHHHHHH HILLARY</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-430476</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-430476</guid>
		<description>serving as first lady does not constitute experience for President, sorry it just doesnt. Perhaps its enough to be president of some social action group, but not for the position of the most powerful person in the world. Let&#039;s be real people, the only policy work she did was health care and that failed miserably. Otherwise she was making photo ops with world leaders while holding some flowers. Experience? Please</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>serving as first lady does not constitute experience for President, sorry it just doesnt. Perhaps its enough to be president of some social action group, but not for the position of the most powerful person in the world. Let's be real people, the only policy work she did was health care and that failed miserably. Otherwise she was making photo ops with world leaders while holding some flowers. Experience? Please</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnArk</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-430469</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnArk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-430469</guid>
		<description>Great job by Hillary.  She and Obama both made outstanding points.  I&#039;m not here to point out who picked on who.  It was just very nice to see them both answering the questions that most of us want answers to.  

Hillary 08 or Obama 08.  I&#039;m a true Democrat and will Vote for one or the other....I will NOT vote Republican, like some of you fake Democrats have stated you would do.  

They both proved tonight that either would be great Presidential material.  I hope the rest of you feel the same way. 

Johnathan
Little Rock, AR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great job by Hillary.  She and Obama both made outstanding points.  I'm not here to point out who picked on who.  It was just very nice to see them both answering the questions that most of us want answers to.  </p>
<p>Hillary 08 or Obama 08.  I'm a true Democrat and will Vote for one or the other....I will NOT vote Republican, like some of you fake Democrats have stated you would do.  </p>
<p>They both proved tonight that either would be great Presidential material.  I hope the rest of you feel the same way. </p>
<p>Johnathan<br />
Little Rock, AR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atobra, MN</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-430458</link>
		<dc:creator>Atobra, MN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-430458</guid>
		<description>I think Hillary was more presidential and more confident than Obama. And i think She will be the very best president of the two of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Hillary was more presidential and more confident than Obama. And i think She will be the very best president of the two of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oscar TX</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-430447</link>
		<dc:creator>Oscar TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-430447</guid>
		<description>Go Hillary 

Your thoughts and focus on Health Care, Immigration and Education are great ideas.  I support

If Obama wins I will go REPUBLICAN .......Go Hillary</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go Hillary </p>
<p>Your thoughts and focus on Health Care, Immigration and Education are great ideas.  I support</p>
<p>If Obama wins I will go REPUBLICAN .......Go Hillary</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kemic</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-430438</link>
		<dc:creator>Kemic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-430438</guid>
		<description>I really do hope and pray that people are pretending to be stupid and aren&#039;t really as stupid as they make themselves seem.  I hope I make this clear.  Obama was against the war.  Clinton wasn&#039;t.  We went to war.  Obama voted to fund the troops.  THEY WERE AT WAR, IDIOTS!!!  Does anyone really suggest he should have voted to withhold funding to our troops?  Heaven help us.  Take sides without understanding the issues if you must but don&#039;t try to cloud the issue for everyone else.

JUDGMENT IS IMPORTANT!!!

OBAMA &#039;08</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really do hope and pray that people are pretending to be stupid and aren't really as stupid as they make themselves seem.  I hope I make this clear.  Obama was against the war.  Clinton wasn't.  We went to war.  Obama voted to fund the troops.  THEY WERE AT WAR, IDIOTS!!!  Does anyone really suggest he should have voted to withhold funding to our troops?  Heaven help us.  Take sides without understanding the issues if you must but don't try to cloud the issue for everyone else.</p>
<p>JUDGMENT IS IMPORTANT!!!</p>
<p>OBAMA '08</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff an Independent</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-430434</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff an Independent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-430434</guid>
		<description>What a laughable question - will they run as the other&#039;s VP!?

Of course not.  Barack has much better judgement than that.  If he asked her, it would kill his chances in the general election.  If not, he&#039;d have to live with her!
If she asked him, she will lose with or without him, and then he&#039;s become part of her old machine and his leadership tarnished.  Of course not!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a laughable question &#8211; will they run as the other's VP!?</p>
<p>Of course not.  Barack has much better judgement than that.  If he asked her, it would kill his chances in the general election.  If not, he'd have to live with her!<br />
If she asked him, she will lose with or without him, and then he's become part of her old machine and his leadership tarnished.  Of course not!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Celine</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-430424</link>
		<dc:creator>Celine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-430424</guid>
		<description>Obama is a leader.  Hillary is a sloganeer.  She is a professional politician looking to get back in the White House for self-serving interests.

Obama is more humanistic and caring.  He is a leader ready to make change for all of us.  America would be making a serious mistake if we lose the chance to elect Obama.  He is a leader you can only find once in a generation.

I am going with Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is a leader.  Hillary is a sloganeer.  She is a professional politician looking to get back in the White House for self-serving interests.</p>
<p>Obama is more humanistic and caring.  He is a leader ready to make change for all of us.  America would be making a serious mistake if we lose the chance to elect Obama.  He is a leader you can only find once in a generation.</p>
<p>I am going with Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rae Ang</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-430423</link>
		<dc:creator>Rae Ang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-430423</guid>
		<description>Go Hillary! I so pray that she will be our next President. Mark my word, we will not regret it!!!! She will steer our country into the right direction. She will do it right on day one!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go Hillary! I so pray that she will be our next President. Mark my word, we will not regret it!!!! She will steer our country into the right direction. She will do it right on day one!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pat</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-430422</link>
		<dc:creator>pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-430422</guid>
		<description>She won the debate. Let me put it to you this way if you need a heart surgen do you go with a resident or do you go with the cheaf of cardiac surgery. He needs more experiance and I dont think  that the white house is the place to get that experiance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She won the debate. Let me put it to you this way if you need a heart surgen do you go with a resident or do you go with the cheaf of cardiac surgery. He needs more experiance and I dont think  that the white house is the place to get that experiance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PHILADELPHIAFREEDOM</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-430419</link>
		<dc:creator>PHILADELPHIAFREEDOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-430419</guid>
		<description>WOLF BLITZER IS SO INCREDIBLY BIASED. AREN&#039;T THE MODERATORS SUPPOSED TO BE FAIR? I&#039;M A REGULAR CNN WATCHER AND I&#039;VE NOTICED HIS TENDENCY TO MISINTERPRET AND SUMMARIZE WITH A BIASED SLANT IN FAVOR OF CLINTON. TONIGHT, HE AGAIN SHOWED THIS BIAS IN THE WAY THAT HE MISCHARACTERIZED OBAMA&#039;S COMMENTS AS &quot;SWIPES&quot; WHEN OBAMA MERELY CONTRASTED HIS RECORD WITH CLINTONS. BUT HE DID NOT USE THE INFLAMMATORY TERM &quot;SWIPE&#039; WHEN CLINTON CONTRASTED HER RECORD. USING THE TERM &quot;SWIPE&quot; HAS NEGATIVE CONNOTATIONS, THAT IS WHY BLITZER CHOSE TO USE IT DELIBERATELY. BLITZER&#039;S ABILITY TO MODERATE AND/OR REPORT FAIRLY SHOULD BE EXAMINED CLOSELY.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOLF BLITZER IS SO INCREDIBLY BIASED. AREN'T THE MODERATORS SUPPOSED TO BE FAIR? I'M A REGULAR CNN WATCHER AND I'VE NOTICED HIS TENDENCY TO MISINTERPRET AND SUMMARIZE WITH A BIASED SLANT IN FAVOR OF CLINTON. TONIGHT, HE AGAIN SHOWED THIS BIAS IN THE WAY THAT HE MISCHARACTERIZED OBAMA'S COMMENTS AS "SWIPES" WHEN OBAMA MERELY CONTRASTED HIS RECORD WITH CLINTONS. BUT HE DID NOT USE THE INFLAMMATORY TERM "SWIPE' WHEN CLINTON CONTRASTED HER RECORD. USING THE TERM "SWIPE" HAS NEGATIVE CONNOTATIONS, THAT IS WHY BLITZER CHOSE TO USE IT DELIBERATELY. BLITZER'S ABILITY TO MODERATE AND/OR REPORT FAIRLY SHOULD BE EXAMINED CLOSELY.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rose, texas</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-430401</link>
		<dc:creator>rose, texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-430401</guid>
		<description>I was a Hillary supporter but after today I am going for Obama.  What made me come to that decision is the striking refusal of Hillary to acknowledge a mistake on her vote to go to war.  She tried to reason and spin and that really irritated me.  Why can she just say I was wrong?  It gave me a question; will she be honest with American people if elected president? Will she tell the truth? Will she admit a mistake when she makes one?  

On the other hand I saw a different with Obama he was very honest in his answers.  He didn’t try pander, but answered the questions very straightforward. 

Sorry Hillary but I have shift Camps!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was a Hillary supporter but after today I am going for Obama.  What made me come to that decision is the striking refusal of Hillary to acknowledge a mistake on her vote to go to war.  She tried to reason and spin and that really irritated me.  Why can she just say I was wrong?  It gave me a question; will she be honest with American people if elected president? Will she tell the truth? Will she admit a mistake when she makes one?  </p>
<p>On the other hand I saw a different with Obama he was very honest in his answers.  He didn’t try pander, but answered the questions very straightforward. </p>
<p>Sorry Hillary but I have shift Camps!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Independent</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-430370</link>
		<dc:creator>Independent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-430370</guid>
		<description>These Clinton fans make me sick


Its unreal how you see her as the best candidate....

Lets go for a CHANGE America and give the guy who obviously has better judgement (which blows her campaigns message of experience).

The Clintons are SHADY!!!!
And how can you vote for a person who voted (and knew she was voting) to send kids to Iraq to be killed????????

Obama 08&#039;
For Unity
For Realistic Issues
For Belief in our Country</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These Clinton fans make me sick</p>
<p>Its unreal how you see her as the best candidate....</p>
<p>Lets go for a CHANGE America and give the guy who obviously has better judgement (which blows her campaigns message of experience).</p>
<p>The Clintons are SHADY!!!!<br />
And how can you vote for a person who voted (and knew she was voting) to send kids to Iraq to be killed????????</p>
<p>Obama 08&#039;<br />
For Unity<br />
For Realistic Issues<br />
For Belief in our Country</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alexander N Jyrwa</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-430360</link>
		<dc:creator>alexander N Jyrwa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-430360</guid>
		<description>I maybe far away from america but its a nation I admired the most. I have always followed and watch every debate, Hillary is exceptional and she is undoubtedly the Best that America have as of now. She will fair well and and I look forward to her Visit to India as America&#039;s First Women President. I am so proud of her. 


Keep it up HILLARY. JOB WELL DONE madam President


Alex

Shillong, Meghalaya
India</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I maybe far away from america but its a nation I admired the most. I have always followed and watch every debate, Hillary is exceptional and she is undoubtedly the Best that America have as of now. She will fair well and and I look forward to her Visit to India as America's First Women President. I am so proud of her. </p>
<p>Keep it up HILLARY. JOB WELL DONE madam President</p>
<p>Alex</p>
<p>Shillong, Meghalaya<br />
India</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg, Houston</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-430351</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg, Houston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-430351</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s hilarious to watch both the parties this year do everything they can think of to lose.  Rush and his moronic &quot;conservative&quot; cronies continually bash the only Republican (McCain) who has a snowball&#039;s chance in hell of getting a single moderate independant voter.  (thank god that they seem to be losing that fight) The Dems seem to want to put the most hated &quot;politician&quot; outside of Bush up there - Hillary.   It doesn&#039;t matter what she says in a debate, most people don&#039;t really care anyway - if she&#039;s the nominee it will positively energize the Republican base to defeat her, and half the dems will simply stay home or switch over for McCain.   (I almost think that Rush wants to see Hillary win, which may be why he&#039;s attacking McCain so hard - nothing pads ol&#039; Rush&#039;s wallet like bashing on the Clintons)

I&#039;m an independant, I hate the Bush administration, believe this war was the biggest mistake of policy in our history, and generally lean democratic the last few years.  But nothing in this world can ever get me to trust a single, solitary word that comes out of Clinton&#039;s mouth.  She&#039;s an opportunist and a carpetbagger and the biggest poster child for the ME-generation.  How anyone can&#039;t see right through her is a bigger mystery to me than how Bush got re-elected.  

If you&#039;re really interested in having a Democratic president, you have to vote for Obama.  A vote for Clinton is a vote for McCain - not that I&#039;m particularly saying that&#039;s a bad thing, but I think a lot of Dems might disagree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's hilarious to watch both the parties this year do everything they can think of to lose.  Rush and his moronic "conservative" cronies continually bash the only Republican (McCain) who has a snowball's chance in hell of getting a single moderate independant voter.  (thank god that they seem to be losing that fight) The Dems seem to want to put the most hated "politician" outside of Bush up there &#8211; Hillary.   It doesn't matter what she says in a debate, most people don't really care anyway &#8211; if she's the nominee it will positively energize the Republican base to defeat her, and half the dems will simply stay home or switch over for McCain.   (I almost think that Rush wants to see Hillary win, which may be why he's attacking McCain so hard &#8211; nothing pads ol' Rush's wallet like bashing on the Clintons)</p>
<p>I'm an independant, I hate the Bush administration, believe this war was the biggest mistake of policy in our history, and generally lean democratic the last few years.  But nothing in this world can ever get me to trust a single, solitary word that comes out of Clinton's mouth.  She's an opportunist and a carpetbagger and the biggest poster child for the ME-generation.  How anyone can't see right through her is a bigger mystery to me than how Bush got re-elected.  </p>
<p>If you're really interested in having a Democratic president, you have to vote for Obama.  A vote for Clinton is a vote for McCain &#8211; not that I'm particularly saying that's a bad thing, but I think a lot of Dems might disagree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carol</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-430341</link>
		<dc:creator>carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-430341</guid>
		<description>Did tou all hear how she explained the 35 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE? Please give me a break.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did tou all hear how she explained the 35 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE? Please give me a break.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Washington Democrat</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-430333</link>
		<dc:creator>Washington Democrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-430333</guid>
		<description>Great debate-both did well, but Hillary clearly came out on top. She sure knows her stuff. She&#039;ll make a fine president.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great debate-both did well, but Hillary clearly came out on top. She sure knows her stuff. She'll make a fine president.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen, Jersey City</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-430329</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen, Jersey City</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-430329</guid>
		<description>For those who say Hillary won let me translate that for you.... you WANTED her to win however Obama won hands down!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those who say Hillary won let me translate that for you.... you WANTED her to win however Obama won hands down!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WIsconsin</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-430328</link>
		<dc:creator>WIsconsin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-430328</guid>
		<description>I will vote for McCann before another Clinton.  You can bet your life Obama and Michelle wont serve with  the Clintons, ever!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will vote for McCann before another Clinton.  You can bet your life Obama and Michelle wont serve with  the Clintons, ever!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hilary</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-430326</link>
		<dc:creator>hilary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-430326</guid>
		<description>Hillary won the debate but I wish she would critique Obama&#039;s voting on Iraq.  His record isn&#039;t innocent and perfect.  She wants to end the war and I think that is what matters. It will take a Clinton to clean up the Bush mess and it isn&#039;t Bill Clinton.  I am one of the biggest fans of Bill Clinton but now I see Hillary as a much stronger, more competent, and brilliant minded future President.  When I hear her policies and ideas for our country, I don&#039;t hear Bill&#039;s ideas anymore - it is all Hillary and I believe she will do what she says.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary won the debate but I wish she would critique Obama's voting on Iraq.  His record isn't innocent and perfect.  She wants to end the war and I think that is what matters. It will take a Clinton to clean up the Bush mess and it isn't Bill Clinton.  I am one of the biggest fans of Bill Clinton but now I see Hillary as a much stronger, more competent, and brilliant minded future President.  When I hear her policies and ideas for our country, I don't hear Bill's ideas anymore &#8211; it is all Hillary and I believe she will do what she says.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janet</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-430325</link>
		<dc:creator>Janet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-430325</guid>
		<description>Do we really want to continue with dynasty politics? Sure the 90s were prosperous, but it was because of the internet boom, not the Clinton presidency.

I&#039;m voting for Obama because he can beat McCain. Clinton would bring out the GOP vote in droves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do we really want to continue with dynasty politics? Sure the 90s were prosperous, but it was because of the internet boom, not the Clinton presidency.</p>
<p>I'm voting for Obama because he can beat McCain. Clinton would bring out the GOP vote in droves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-430300</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-430300</guid>
		<description>that my hillary Go my president from the ordaz famlily</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that my hillary Go my president from the ordaz famlily</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomdavie</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-430291</link>
		<dc:creator>tomdavie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-430291</guid>
		<description>Obama failed on his health bill that is still  just a cheap SPIN on the same republican pay for private insurance. 

He tried to pin the cost on Clinton, but she wormed her way out of it. 

Clinton then called Obama on the fact that he would mandate children, and didnt seem to suggest how he would FINE parents who DIDNT insure their kids under his plan. The same argument he used on Clinton about how she would FINE people who refused to get insurance. 

She did very well to PIN the universal health care as a CORE ISSUE with democrats, which drew heavy applause. She also PINNED herself to Edwards -against Obama - when it came to universal healthcare. 

Obama REALLY FAILED when he tried to SPIN Kennedy in on the immigration reform. He suggested he was the only one &#039;consistent&#039; 

Clinton fired back that in fact SHE CO SPONSORED a bill on immigration reform in 2004 - which was BEFORE he was in senate. 

This made Obama look like a rookie, and also showed Kennedy wasnt the first one to draft such a bill . 

i think this was the KILLER blow to minimize Kennedys influence with Latios.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama failed on his health bill that is still  just a cheap SPIN on the same republican pay for private insurance. </p>
<p>He tried to pin the cost on Clinton, but she wormed her way out of it. </p>
<p>Clinton then called Obama on the fact that he would mandate children, and didnt seem to suggest how he would FINE parents who DIDNT insure their kids under his plan. The same argument he used on Clinton about how she would FINE people who refused to get insurance. </p>
<p>She did very well to PIN the universal health care as a CORE ISSUE with democrats, which drew heavy applause. She also PINNED herself to Edwards -against Obama &#8211; when it came to universal healthcare. </p>
<p>Obama REALLY FAILED when he tried to SPIN Kennedy in on the immigration reform. He suggested he was the only one 'consistent' </p>
<p>Clinton fired back that in fact SHE CO SPONSORED a bill on immigration reform in 2004 &#8211; which was BEFORE he was in senate. </p>
<p>This made Obama look like a rookie, and also showed Kennedy wasnt the first one to draft such a bill . </p>
<p>i think this was the KILLER blow to minimize Kennedys influence with Latios.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.F.</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-430289</link>
		<dc:creator>J.F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-430289</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you Jay C.  Wow, is there so much hate towards Obama that people will run to the other side if he&#039;s the nominee?  Well, that makes sense coming from her supporters, she does the same thing - change her position!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm with you Jay C.  Wow, is there so much hate towards Obama that people will run to the other side if he's the nominee?  Well, that makes sense coming from her supporters, she does the same thing &#8211; change her position!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OBAMATheGreat2008</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-430286</link>
		<dc:creator>OBAMATheGreat2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-430286</guid>
		<description>I loved the tone of tonight&#039;s conversation.  Hillary was very competent and showed well.  Obama has my vote though, I think he&#039;ll hold up better to the republicans, and I think he&#039;ll help us regain our respect in the world.  These two can play nice with each other right now b/c America needs to see that the Dems are unified and that they have a new message that has to be heard.   Edwards would help &quot;season&quot; Obama&#039;s presidency just right.


Obama/Edwards 08!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved the tone of tonight's conversation.  Hillary was very competent and showed well.  Obama has my vote though, I think he'll hold up better to the republicans, and I think he'll help us regain our respect in the world.  These two can play nice with each other right now b/c America needs to see that the Dems are unified and that they have a new message that has to be heard.   Edwards would help "season" Obama's presidency just right.</p>
<p>Obama/Edwards 08!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mario</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-430280</link>
		<dc:creator>Mario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-430280</guid>
		<description>Hilary had a wonderful night, I certainly think she won this debate.I particularly liked her take on health care and the war.She seems to really know what she is doing and she has a lot of experience and brains.I hope enough people noticed she should be our next president.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hilary had a wonderful night, I certainly think she won this debate.I particularly liked her take on health care and the war.She seems to really know what she is doing and she has a lot of experience and brains.I hope enough people noticed she should be our next president.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: devaki ganesan</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-430273</link>
		<dc:creator>devaki ganesan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-430273</guid>
		<description>Hillary has complete control and knowledge of most important issues. She analyzes them very nicely in simple terms.

My vote is for Sen Clinton. She is thoughtful and understands all aspects of the problem before her decisions. On economuy and jobs she clearly has ideas.

I like her health care plan. She can get it done.

She will get the best experts for jobs to be done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary has complete control and knowledge of most important issues. She analyzes them very nicely in simple terms.</p>
<p>My vote is for Sen Clinton. She is thoughtful and understands all aspects of the problem before her decisions. On economuy and jobs she clearly has ideas.</p>
<p>I like her health care plan. She can get it done.</p>
<p>She will get the best experts for jobs to be done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dream-on</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-430267</link>
		<dc:creator>Dream-on</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-430267</guid>
		<description>Unbiased? NOT! - is right, adding the 50% Hispanics and it sound like CNN was trying to MAKE the news instead of reporting it. And CNN pointing fingers to the &quot;University Professor&quot; is B.S.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unbiased? NOT! &#8211; is right, adding the 50% Hispanics and it sound like CNN was trying to MAKE the news instead of reporting it. And CNN pointing fingers to the "University Professor" is B.S.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca - O.C.</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-430258</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca - O.C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-430258</guid>
		<description>I totally trust Senator Clinton when she speaks not only merely for her speech but for her past actions ... and I see her as a very strong, determinating, steadfast, honest and capable President that can &quot;only&quot; bring back the hope and trust so many Americans &amp; other country&#039;s  lost in America over the past 8 years.  It&#039;s not just about her experience, it&#039;s about her strong character and belief that has maintained steadfast throughout many, many years and continues forward with great hope for America.

There&#039;s just &quot;something&quot; about Obama that doesn&#039;t feel right ... and mainly because I hear in his speeches quite often (like tonight) slashes at Hilary, as she didn&#039;t feel threatened and insecure in her positions to over react with negative back slashes at him.  She smiled graciously and carefully defended her position and cleared the record consistently.  She focused more on issues, as he would try to slash her almost in every answer, while cautiously trying to seem fair.  Even Wolf caught on to his under slashes at Hilary, while Hilary took it with a smile and then graciously defended herself and corrected Obama.  He just doesn&#039;t seem to straighten up and fly right with core specific issues.  He is a good talker ... I&#039;ll give him that.  But, if I can see him coming ... so will other country&#039;s!  I don&#039;t think so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally trust Senator Clinton when she speaks not only merely for her speech but for her past actions ... and I see her as a very strong, determinating, steadfast, honest and capable President that can "only" bring back the hope and trust so many Americans &amp; other country's  lost in America over the past 8 years.  It's not just about her experience, it's about her strong character and belief that has maintained steadfast throughout many, many years and continues forward with great hope for America.</p>
<p>There's just "something" about Obama that doesn't feel right ... and mainly because I hear in his speeches quite often (like tonight) slashes at Hilary, as she didn't feel threatened and insecure in her positions to over react with negative back slashes at him.  She smiled graciously and carefully defended her position and cleared the record consistently.  She focused more on issues, as he would try to slash her almost in every answer, while cautiously trying to seem fair.  Even Wolf caught on to his under slashes at Hilary, while Hilary took it with a smile and then graciously defended herself and corrected Obama.  He just doesn't seem to straighten up and fly right with core specific issues.  He is a good talker ... I'll give him that.  But, if I can see him coming ... so will other country's!  I don't think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.K</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-430257</link>
		<dc:creator>R.K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-430257</guid>
		<description>1.  Wolf had a real tough time finding any differences.  It should come down to who is more likely to win.  If polls are to be believed, that should be Obama.  Then again, Hillary&#039;s high negatives could bring in Bloomberg.  Despite his desire not to be a spoiler, no amount of research can guarantee he won&#039;t be.  
2.  Why did CNN correspondents keep saying that one of these two &quot;will&quot; be the Democratic nominee?  Is it not still possible that a brokered convention will be forced to choose somebody else?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.  Wolf had a real tough time finding any differences.  It should come down to who is more likely to win.  If polls are to be believed, that should be Obama.  Then again, Hillary's high negatives could bring in Bloomberg.  Despite his desire not to be a spoiler, no amount of research can guarantee he won't be.<br />
2.  Why did CNN correspondents keep saying that one of these two "will" be the Democratic nominee?  Is it not still possible that a brokered convention will be forced to choose somebody else?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnS</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-430240</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-430240</guid>
		<description>I CONSIDER THIS TO BE THE BEST POST FOR THE NIGHT!!!!
Very Interesting , Clean Up after the Bush&#039;s. Give us a break,,,, the Clinton&#039;s came from dirt, handeled their life like dirt, and treated the highest office on earth like dirt. We are still cleaning up after ALL the dirt.

No wonder you spend taxpayers money so freely when you do not see the Goverment like a business… Try getting your check book balanced for a change.

Your views on Immigration ( See Above) we are a government of rules and regulations and balance (enforce the rules in place) we do not need to think of what to do,,,, follow the rules and regulations on the books NOW!

How dishonest can both of you be,,,, not once did you confirm the roll of the soldiers and the effort they are doing,,, in fact MRS RODHAM said that she saw nothing good that happen,,,,millions of people are free, we are trying again to clean up the dirt you left behind. Disgraceful your lack of love for freedom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I CONSIDER THIS TO BE THE BEST POST FOR THE NIGHT!!!!<br />
Very Interesting , Clean Up after the Bush's. Give us a break,,,, the Clinton's came from dirt, handeled their life like dirt, and treated the highest office on earth like dirt. We are still cleaning up after ALL the dirt.</p>
<p>No wonder you spend taxpayers money so freely when you do not see the Goverment like a business… Try getting your check book balanced for a change.</p>
<p>Your views on Immigration ( See Above) we are a government of rules and regulations and balance (enforce the rules in place) we do not need to think of what to do,,,, follow the rules and regulations on the books NOW!</p>
<p>How dishonest can both of you be,,,, not once did you confirm the roll of the soldiers and the effort they are doing,,, in fact MRS RODHAM said that she saw nothing good that happen,,,,millions of people are free, we are trying again to clean up the dirt you left behind. Disgraceful your lack of love for freedom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: June (California Voter)</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/people-meter-undecided-democratic-voters-weigh-in/#comment-430235</link>
		<dc:creator>June (California Voter)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=4952#comment-430235</guid>
		<description>But Hillary won the debate I want to add.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But Hillary won the debate I want to add.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
