January 31, 2008
Posted: 09:18 PM ET
Former presidents Bush and Clinton attended the funeral of former Russian president Boris Yeltsin together in 2007.
Former presidents Bush and Clinton attended the funeral of former Russian president Boris Yeltsin together in 2007.

The question of the past vs. the future keeps raising its head – this time in a question that raises the dynastic concerns in the minds of many Americans: nearly three straight decades of a Bush or a Clinton on the presidential ballot.

Clinton turns the question on its head, repeating a pithy campaign trail formulation that always resonates with Democratic audiences: it takes a Clinton to clean up after a Bush.

The happiest man this evening? Howard Dean. So far tonight, the Democratic party is the big winner. This debate clearly beats last night’s debate. But if you’re trying to use the forum to decide which candidate to support, you might come away more uncertain than ever.

Related: Watch Hillary Clinton take a dig at President Bush

–CNN Senior Political Analyst Bill Schneider

Filed under: Bill Schneider


dont censor me , bro   February 1st, 2008 7:31 am ET

moderater, my suspended postings lead me to re-read your disclaimer written at the bottom of the page. dont argue with or challenge the moderater to post our comments,, point taken. this is your site and your rules . be happy our comments go to post when they do

Meme   January 31st, 2008 10:43 pm ET

In spite of whether or not Hillary would be a good president, my choice is something different. Americans are just not accustomed to have 2 families tossing the presidency back and forth. Hillary just brings back too much of the past. It's time to move on.

Christina   January 31st, 2008 10:20 pm ET

The debate was terrific and shows that Barack Obama is the person this country needs to run the United States of America for this time in history. Yes, Hillary is a good person, politician and very intelligent. However, Barack brings the integrity, clean slate, judgement, leadership, and organization ability needed to address each and every issue that we confront at this time. He has been able to withstand every attack that has come before him because of his background and willingness to be honest and to self-reveal his beliefs. He is a proven leader who said the war was wrong from the beginning. He is a powerful, focused leader, strong Christian, internationally savvy, and a highly intelligent person with the ability to unite persons regardless of social, economic, educational, gender, ethnic, cultural, lifestyle or any other differences. Keep in mind, the future President Obama will have the stature, civility, experience, and presence to bring honor and respect to the United States in any country and with any leader throughout the world. His presence will change the position of America in the minds of the world. I am so confident in this man's ability to lead us well. Vote Obama. We deserve him as our leader.

yolanda   January 31st, 2008 10:16 pm ET

We need someone who is strong in every issues,who we could trust and depend on taking care of the United State of America. Who is fresh with new ideas. I do admire Clinton, but she voted for the troops to go to war, My son has been there in Iraq for a year. I'm going to vote for Obama.

margie   January 31st, 2008 10:08 pm ET

WOW what a tough choice…These two are smart folks..A quick Question Bill..Who would get more respect from foreign leaders..A white woman or a black man?

jen-in-ca   January 31st, 2008 10:07 pm ET

It was a Great debate and I believe Hillary had the most clear and informative answers. Go clean up Bush's Hillary.

Scott C   January 31st, 2008 10:05 pm ET

The only thing Barack Obama could do at this point to lose my vote in November is to run with Hillary as his VP.

Barbara Kerr   January 31st, 2008 10:04 pm ET

Barack Obama has much in common with FDR: outstandingly persuasive language, and strength of vision — enough to mobilize a nation to meet the difficult things asked of it.

June A   January 31st, 2008 10:04 pm ET

This was an excellent debate and could make voting for the undecided voteravery
difficult. However I disagree with John H and others who say Obama answers the questions better. Hillary is more substantive and gives answers that are more in depth. Obama answers with quip remarks and naive solutions. It is the tone of his voice and the way that he presents his answers that pulls some people in. He talks about change but does not convince me that he has the skills nor the experience needed to make such a change.

Corinna   January 31st, 2008 10:03 pm ET

How come that this debate clearly beats last nights? 1 1/2 hour for 4 canditates versus 2 hours for 2? Very different standards were set. Too bad for he Republican candidates yesterday. I wish we could have heard more about Ron Paul's views on issues as well as Mike Huckabees. I think this tells clearly where CNN stands.

Pam   January 31st, 2008 10:00 pm ET

A ticket to dream for…but if I have to choose, YES WE CAN! Obama takes this one.

Jake   January 31st, 2008 10:00 pm ET

Loved Clinton's come back on this question! She's the one that would make Democrats pround, because she a survivor!

Susan   January 31st, 2008 10:00 pm ET

What's up with the discussion about the indiscretions of Bill Clinton? She wasn't the one who committed these indiscretions. I will say she reacted in a most dignified way when all those things became public knowledge. I don't think I could have behaved as well in the same situation. How she responded in that situation was nothing less than exceptional

Mike   January 31st, 2008 9:58 pm ET

We, me, are members of the Democratic Party, not DemocRATS as the right wing talk show host have been callings us, using subliminal messages. We need to get bac to that

Barbara Kerr   January 31st, 2008 9:57 pm ET

When the Clintons criticize Obama for eloquence, for lofty words and little substance, I think of FDR whose eloquence and lofty words and remarkably strong outreach to the people whose response was " Yes, we can" to his call to personal involvement, labor, and c ommitment to get the nation successfully World War II.

Amy   January 31st, 2008 9:55 pm ET

As a woman, I am offended by those who insinuate a vote for Obama is an anti-feminist vote. Hillary is a strong woman, but she is not the RIGHT woman. When the RIGHT woman presents- She WILL NOT need her husband's name recognition, nor need her husband to fight her fights, or raise her campaign funds. She is NOT the feminist candidate, she's a dependant woman.

Rocky2   January 31st, 2008 9:55 pm ET

Thank goodness we have the Democratic Party!
I'm not sure which of them I'll vote for, because
both are excellent. What a difference from last night's
Republicans!!!

JCB   January 31st, 2008 9:51 pm ET

Can anyone out there answer the question why Clinton does not make the point that Obama was never in the position to actually vote on the Iraq war resolution since he was not in the U.S Senate until 2005? The point being is that it is far easier to make a speech opposing the war while you are merely a STATE senator in Illinois and not a U.S Senator answering to a national constituency who was primed for retribution for 911 and led by a president who was grossly disingenuous with his facts and his hidden agenda in going to war.

christopher   January 31st, 2008 9:51 pm ET

Obama has made inroads on this Republican- This debate compared to last nights has made the choice much easier. Obama is the right person at the right time in history to make the real changes I keep hearing about. Let's not blame the Bush and Clinton families for the short comings of this country of our- We the People are responsible for what is right and wrong about American politics

sara   January 31st, 2008 9:51 pm ET

Bill, I love your wit and intelligence but I think you just don't get it. Barack brings a special gift to the Democrat's this year…..authenticity……you just can't fake it.

Grace, Overland Park, Kansas   January 31st, 2008 9:51 pm ET

that line is so old. unfortunately even though a clinton cleaned up after a bush last time, that clinton left a big mess of scandal and corruption that made a perfect opportunity for the "moral values" bush to try to clean up after that clinton. that was a weak albeit brilliantly calculated line that will appeal to those who can't think critically.

Nancy   January 31st, 2008 9:50 pm ET

Best debate yet. It has solidified my belief in Clinton. For my kids sake, I believe in Clinton now, Obama later.

Misti   January 31st, 2008 9:49 pm ET

I'd love to see a woman in the White House, but not this one. Everything about her rings false, and she's obviously a frontman for her husband. And that CACKLE - how can were listen to that for four more years?

Noreen   January 31st, 2008 9:47 pm ET

Right on Day 1. Glad to know Obama is perfect and will never make mistakes.

kyderbymom   January 31st, 2008 9:47 pm ET

I loved Bill Clinton, but I don't think that it would be good for this country to have two families leading this country for so long. I also can't imagine Hillary uniting this country in the way we desperately need to be united. Obama can. He excites me in the same way my mother said Kennedy excited her. He gives me hope like I've never experienced before.

I only regret that when my primary rolls around, the decision will already have been made for me. We need to fix the primary system!

Mike   January 31st, 2008 9:47 pm ET

Wolf does appear biased against Hillary, disappointing, I thought he was above that as an independent moderator.

Janet   January 31st, 2008 9:46 pm ET

I think by far Senator Clinton has done the best in the debate tonight. I am a registered Republican.

Noreen   January 31st, 2008 9:45 pm ET

Susan "Not the same Barack we saw at any other debate."

That is because there is one person missing who would press him to give more details of his own and not "borrow" from the candidate that is no longer running a campaign.

Marcia   January 31st, 2008 9:44 pm ET

Too bad Hillary did not permanently keep her name as Hillary Rodham … then there would be no talk of a "Clinton Dynasty."

Black Women in Florida for Hillary   January 31st, 2008 9:44 pm ET

I am so impressed with Hillary.
You Go Girl!

President Clinton 2008! with Obama as VP will work. He needs more experience.

gary barbour   January 31st, 2008 9:44 pm ET

Wolfe, you're in a tough spot but SHE NEVER ANSWERED YOUR QUESTION ON THE WAR! Don't let her bully you. This is what she'll do with everyone else who doesn't agree with her decisions. The facat is she is criticizing Bush and hiding behind him at the same time. Barrack had a very measured and pointed response by saying, 'who will make the right decision on day one.'. Barrack is winning lots of points here…

MAfor Hillary   January 31st, 2008 9:44 pm ET

Nancy in Minneapolis….
Maria Shriver's brother is with HILLARY!!!! As are her cousins, Bobby Kennedy Jr., Kathleen Kennedy and Kerry Kennedy.
Bill - still waiting for you to give Hillary anything close to the constant puffery you give to Barack.

ABL   January 31st, 2008 9:43 pm ET

Bush/Clinton/Bush/Clinton - Hillary's attempt at humor in responding to that question is dynastic and embarrasing in a nation with 300 million people! Obama should have been given an oppotunity to respond and should have said that the Clintons and Bushs have spent decades making political deals and making enemies. These are liabilities that we cannot allow our next President to enter the oval office with. It's time break away from these people.

wickera   January 31st, 2008 9:43 pm ET

Wolf is acting like a Republican! Let's treat both candidates fairly. Edge to Wolf/Hillary and he knows it!

Liam   January 31st, 2008 9:43 pm ET

Sure Hillary's comment its takes a Clinton to clean up after a Bush got a great applause, it was funny - but we don't need another comedian in the White House.
Obama for change.

Al   January 31st, 2008 9:43 pm ET

Obama/Clinton? She wouldn't go for it and she's too old. Clinton/Obama? A winning ticket and the next 16 years … well, not sewn up, but at least given a good chance.

Phil Mancuso   January 31st, 2008 9:42 pm ET

a question for both candidates….
How do your positions differ from those outlined in the Communist Manifesto?

You both seem to have little regard for the constitution.

andrea   January 31st, 2008 9:41 pm ET

i think that obama and clinton balance each out very well and instead of taking jabs at each other they are making jabs together against the republican i think which eaither won wins they should pull in the other one they would be a great power team.

d   January 31st, 2008 9:41 pm ET

Give it up on the adultery issue. Its old news and its none of your business.

Mark   January 31st, 2008 9:41 pm ET

Clinton is coasting and all Obama can do is agree…c'mon he's not driving home the point that McCain or Romney will hammer on a Clinton. Obama would be difficult for the Republicans because they don't have any offensive plays laying on the bookshelf ready to dust off against him.

Josie   January 31st, 2008 9:39 pm ET

Seriously, she knows these issues inside and out. He has been drilling home the same points and lines he has used at all the debates? Is that all there is?

Amy   January 31st, 2008 9:39 pm ET

I could not in good conscious vote for either Obama or Clinton. Both of them will sell the American people short.

jim mosier   January 31st, 2008 9:38 pm ET

unfortunately what Mrs. Clinton meant was that she will be a better pooper scooper…

Mary Bethea   January 31st, 2008 9:38 pm ET

Senator Clinton did not vote against the war from day one; what make the American people think that she will have our soldiers at heart , if she is elected president of the US..

theal2   January 31st, 2008 9:38 pm ET

They are both doing the Democratic party proud.

steve   January 31st, 2008 9:37 pm ET

cheap shot by Wolf on being nieve.

keith landreth   January 31st, 2008 9:37 pm ET

How Can WeFeel Safer As aNation With A woman AsPresident When The Middle East Thinks Verry Little Of Women

Steves   January 31st, 2008 9:37 pm ET

I thought Sen Clintons comback about "It woud again take a Clinton to clean up after another Bu$h" was right on.

eiohr   January 31st, 2008 9:37 pm ET

Actually when it comes to Bill or Hillary, I always thought that she was smarter than him all along. But in 1990's there could be no way a woman could run for president. We've come a long way baby!

jewel littenberg   January 31st, 2008 9:37 pm ET

I disagree as to Senator's Clinton and Obama creating confusion as to who is the best suited for the job. In my opinion, Senator Clinton appears to be much more in command of the issues. She speaks with a convincing voice that she clearly understands the problems and solutions. Her words have substance. I do not feel the same about Senator Obama. I feel his answers are peppered with many unnecessary words……and can be condensed into a few sentences. She will be ready to take charge from day 1. He will have to rely on too many to push him in the right direction.

Austin   January 31st, 2008 9:36 pm ET

Wolf Blitzer's BLATANT support of Obama is disgusting. He should be ashamed.

Melvina Jordan   January 31st, 2008 9:35 pm ET

I have been watching presidential debates since their inception in 1960 ( my first time to cast a ballot). Since the historic Kennedy-Nixon debates, this is the first time that I have seen true intelligence, grasp of the issues. and the genuine feeling that I would be equally pleased to have either of these candidates as the next President. Ever since Admiral Stockdale had his hearing aid turned off during a vice-presidential debate, last evening during the Republcan debate i wished that I had an aid to turn off. I think many Americans feel as I do. Last night I saw "Bush on steriods" vs." Mr. whatever you want, I am it" it completely turned me off and wish for Admiral Stockdale's hearing aid!!!

Susan B.   January 31st, 2008 9:35 pm ET

Obama is all form, no substance. He waxes poetic about change and the future and hugging mothers…but what CAN he do about it? He is a GREAT speaker but if we're looking for inspiration, let's vote for that Michael Douglas character in The American President. Oh, wait. That was make believe!

If you were looking for an employee to run a business you inherited, would you go with the one who wowed you with rhetoric about how great the company could be or would you glance at a resume and think about actual achievements. if it was YOUR livelihood? C'mon. Get real.

Thomas   January 31st, 2008 9:35 pm ET

The more I watch the more I'm convinced a Clinton/Obama or Obama/Clinton (either way) ticket will be one that will be almost impossible for the Republicans to beat.

Tim & Kim   January 31st, 2008 9:35 pm ET

Clinton was not impeached….and the young girl got her 15 minutes of fame…in the body of a young women. All men at some point have made mistakes including past presidents. His error of judgement was between him and his wife…what he did was a human error against his family not against his country. Forgive and forget. Besides….Bill is NOT running…you need to listen to Mrs. President.

frank   January 31st, 2008 9:35 pm ET

where is the debate i dont see one so far . wolf needs to shut her up

Anonymous   January 31st, 2008 9:34 pm ET

I'll consider voting for a good independent (if that option comes up) if clinton wins… I can't feel ok about the two families… since 1980…

Howard Pavane   January 31st, 2008 9:34 pm ET

You are absolutely correct. I thought my mind was made up (Obama) prior to tonight's debate. Now I am rethinking which of these two candidates will get my vote on Tuesday. The good news is that either one will make a great president and surely has much more to offer than any of the Republicans. It is good to know that Howard Dean is happy - he should be.

Susan   January 31st, 2008 9:34 pm ET

I am so proud of both of Senator Clinton and Senator Obama. Yes, I have my preference, but at least now I can start to feel that whomever wins, I will proudly vote for the DEMOCRAT!!

Norm   January 31st, 2008 9:34 pm ET

The bottom line is that in a general election, Hillary's greatest liability will be Bill Clinton. The same voters who gave George Bush a second term based on "Moral Values" will fight tooth and nail to keep Bill Clinton out of the White House because of his past misdeeds. Because rural areas have so much influence under the Electoral College, this issue will tip the scale and put another Republican in the White House. It's a sad reality and I hope I'm wrong about this.

5th Watcher   January 31st, 2008 9:33 pm ET

It takes a Clinton to clean up after a Bush: A clever comment, but I hope it is not WITTS that will cause people to vote one way or another.

Barbara   January 31st, 2008 9:33 pm ET

If she wants to be judged on her own merits she should stop bringing up Bill's accomplishments. Can't have it both ways.

Laura Nieto   January 31st, 2008 9:33 pm ET

My name is Laura Nieto, and I am a latina woman and first time voter. I have lived in this country for 40 years. My first seven years I lived in NY and worked in factories and babysitting. Then I joined the Army because I wanted to go to college on the G-IBill. I was sent to Germany and traveled the world almost 25 countries. I became a teacher and now I am ready to vote for the first time in my life. I am ready this time to vote for both of them!
I think Senator Clinton and Senator Omaba are equally great people to lead the USA.
I wish the two of them get together and run the country one as a president and the other as a vice-president
Please send my message. They both have different intelligences therefore they differ in how to deal with issues. Please let them change our USA History for the first time in the history of the USA..

Democrat   January 31st, 2008 9:33 pm ET

Strongest Ticket will be for them both to be on it. No matter who the VP is. This debate is preparation for that, look how dignified, respectful, and presidential they both are being tonight.!!!

dawn coe   January 31st, 2008 9:32 pm ET

I pretty much gave my vote to Ms. Clinton after the experience question. And for the record she served an entire term more in the senate than he did, didn't she?

evelyn   January 31st, 2008 9:32 pm ET

Old vs New Barack cannot use that anymore since the endorsement he received from Ted Kennedy he is the oldest establishment going.
And Bobby Kennedys children are backing Hillary, wasn't their father more of a civil rights leader then Ted? There is something wrong with this picture.

Betty Rose   January 31st, 2008 9:32 pm ET

Joe H-You are right!
It feels like they have listened to President Bill that the Press needs to be hard on Barak.

George   January 31st, 2008 9:32 pm ET

It seems as if they want them to really take shots at each other for the ratings… Hillary is really on her stump speeches tonight…. she is tactially speaking at cali voters.

Patti T   January 31st, 2008 9:31 pm ET

i would be pleased with which ever one is nominated with the other being thier running partner. They would be a force to be reconned with.

Frank   January 31st, 2008 9:31 pm ET

I think that Romney had it right: Can you really imagine Bill in the White House with nothing to do. Do we need a two family 28 year royalty? How much different than Singapore, Pakistan etc

Nancy   January 31st, 2008 9:31 pm ET

Regarding "Kennedy" endorsements, one wonders what Maria Schriver thinks? Hey, Mrs. Terminator– are you with Arnold or Uncle Ted? Just idle curiosity…. Nancy in Minneapolis

RobC   January 31st, 2008 9:31 pm ET

I have been, and will stay an stringent Obama supporter. However, this debate is what I hoped for all along. I think Obama will make a better President, as he is a proven uniter. I will say that Senator Clinton has debated the issues admirably and honarably (tonight…so far). This debate has made me confident that I can vote for the Democratic nominee, no matter who it is.

Peggy   January 31st, 2008 9:31 pm ET

Whoa! I want to hear about the issues and what her plans are, keep private lives out of the discussion.

Ken   January 31st, 2008 9:30 pm ET

Who will clean up after Bill?………………………Another Intern?

Sonia   January 31st, 2008 9:30 pm ET

Hillary gives very good answers. Hillary keep up, your are strong, this is what we need.

Dan T   January 31st, 2008 9:30 pm ET

I really think that regardless of the person chosen the Democratic candidate will be a harbinger of the changes we need in this country. It's a win win.

Karen   January 31st, 2008 9:30 pm ET

This is strictly a personality debate.
It's how many people would invite Hillary for dinner vs. how would invite Obama.
It's who likes Hillarys jewelry vs. Obamas tie.

FLgirl   January 31st, 2008 9:30 pm ET

what is up with Wolf? Why does he keep telling Obama he is taking swipes at Hillary? It's a debate. Obama is being pretty darn civil. Wolf is acting like her protector for God's sake. She seems to be doing fine both on defense AND offense.

Scott   January 31st, 2008 9:30 pm ET

Hilllary is not deflecting a thing. It is envigorating to hear her respond to actual questions/issues.

hc   January 31st, 2008 9:30 pm ET

It'd be really nice to hear commentary that gives the perspective of so many women in America - Barack's body language (cocked head and arm on her chair) is increasingly typical of him. Give Hillary a little respect - if Barack were a woman you'd be saying "not bad for such a neophyte!"

Justin McKamey   January 31st, 2008 9:29 pm ET

She stood by her "man" because that's what a wife is supposed to do. She took vowels to support him in his worst of times and best of times. Just because she stood by her husband doesn't make her a weak person, it only empowers her as a woman and a human being.

Tim   January 31st, 2008 9:29 pm ET

I'm Irish watching this across the Atlantic. Hillary tonight has spoken with meaning and has provided substance. I CANNOT BELIEVE so many Americans are swayed just because Obama utters "hope" or "change" or an ironic endorsement from a Presidential dynasty of the past. Obama would make a good President but Hillary would make a great President.

KJM   January 31st, 2008 9:29 pm ET

The only reason this debate is better than last night is because the moderator / questioners are not BAITING the candidates.

frank   January 31st, 2008 9:29 pm ET

hillary is dominating a long speech for every question

Patti T   January 31st, 2008 9:29 pm ET

I agree tonights debate may make an undecided person even more undecided. I am very pleased with the way both Obama and Hillary are keeping their debate on an even keel, and keeping the arguing out of it.
Thank you.

KB   January 31st, 2008 9:29 pm ET

This is bull let her answer let him speak STOP you let her rebuttal every comment he makes that is why you get so few questions answered. This woman changes when the wind blows. She is a DIVIDER she does not get along well and is very opinionated not a good look for the next President. Look at how she is all in his body space. Tell th ereal polls tell how well he is liked over seas. Tell how attitude = 100% and that is what we will get from him Tell how after her husband left offfice Democrats lost at state and Washington levels big time TELL THE TRUTH!!!

LT   January 31st, 2008 9:29 pm ET

Puh-leeze. This is nothing more than a televised circle jerk.

Zach   January 31st, 2008 9:29 pm ET

If Hillary Clinton has the potential to bring the change she claims a 2nd Bush would never have been ellected after the 1st Clinton.

Sylvia   January 31st, 2008 9:29 pm ET

What will President Clinton's role be during Hillary's administration? The fact is he would be back in the White House working to make decisions for the country. I think it would be an interesting question for her to answer.

Dave in IN   January 31st, 2008 9:28 pm ET

So does Hillary mean we get more scandels, adultery (more decline), and "old" Washington politics…. my vote goes for Obama!

eiohr   January 31st, 2008 9:28 pm ET

I am not sure I agree with Bill Schneider on his last statement . I am a Republican viewing this to see if I would finally, after 30 years, vote democratic. Hearing what each is saying, I can honestly say that I see quite a difference in their ability and what is being said. I would come away so far with a clear candidate to support, which really surprises me.

Douglas Langer   January 31st, 2008 9:28 pm ET

Why is it that noone asks the canidates what they will do for labor in America.

Prayu   January 31st, 2008 9:28 pm ET

Barack wins the Iraq debate handily; there's just no getting around the fact that Hillary supported the war, and he was against it from the start.

In terms of performance, she seemed much stronger when it came to healthcare; however, now that she's struggling with the war and foreign policy, she sounds a lot less confident and can offer nothing against Obama's examples of fine judgement.

She resorts to McCain/Bush bashing, which is always good though.

Chris Mouzong   January 31st, 2008 9:28 pm ET

I feel the democratic uniting working. I would be proud to have either of tonight's candidates representing America on the world stage.

R Clark   January 31st, 2008 9:28 pm ET

Mr. Schneider, you are right - based on the debate so far, choosing between the two candidates is tough. I realize in the end one must "win", but I hope whoever ultimately triumphs in the primaries we who favor the Democrats and their policies will unite and bring major change to the Presidency.

Amy   January 31st, 2008 9:28 pm ET

This debate does not beat last night's debate. The debate last night addressed real substantive issues affecting the American people, economically and politically. Ron Paul, Mitt Romney, and Mike Huckabee were especially brilliant.

ESF from Boynton Beach   January 31st, 2008 9:28 pm ET

The Democratic voters of Florida have been disenfranchised by the Democratic Party. What can/will the candidates do to have a delegation from Florida seated at the convention?
I am a registered independant voter and I am appalled by the undemocratic actions of the Democratic Party.

Sean Lopez   January 31st, 2008 9:28 pm ET

Hillary and Obama sound like they are running a campaign against Bush. As an Independent, my candidate is John McCain. In the event McCain doesn't win, I could get behind and unite with Barack Obama, but never Hillary Clinton.

Tim M   January 31st, 2008 9:28 pm ET

Wolf Blitzer deserves to be fired. He consistently tries to accuse Obama of "swiping" at Clinton. He needs to stop trying to provoke a fight.

adrain_andrews   January 31st, 2008 9:28 pm ET

It is very clear this obama guy is what every amercian won't as a leader. hillary even see him as a leadder. let heim lead our country and watch the results he speaks with power with out using force. I am 25 and i never thought i would be in poliitic but this guy can get anyone to follow. Go Mr. Obama you have my vote u trurly make the world feel united that really what we are.

SS   January 31st, 2008 9:28 pm ET

Sure, Clinton may change from Bush, but she won't change from the other Clinton. Maybe what we need is a new perspective. A new vantage point on how the US should be working. Sometimes, the less expierence lets the candidate be more inclined to take different risks that a run-of-the-mill politician might make.
GO OBAMA!!

wahutu siguru   January 31st, 2008 9:27 pm ET

oh…………….since it takes a clinton to clean up after a Bush, is she really bringing change?

lindyj   January 31st, 2008 9:27 pm ET

They would make a dream team. I hope they can continue to send of the democratic message of unity.

Cecile   January 31st, 2008 9:27 pm ET

They 're "having such a wonderful time" ….:-)

I would say, Barack Obama if he continues that way would benefit this debate more. Why, because he is not below her like he was before, he is calm and collected, and this only in the momenteum he obviously has (according to lastest polls results) will be enough for a smooth continuation of momenteum.

Mike   January 31st, 2008 9:27 pm ET

Could Blitzer show any more bias in favor of Clinton? All night, he's been cutting Obama off when he gets applause, and continuously is accusing him of mudslinging. When will the higher ups as CNN realize this moron is the reason that their ratings are in the tank?

Anabela   January 31st, 2008 9:27 pm ET

True, but either way the Democratic Party will make history!

badmus   January 31st, 2008 9:27 pm ET

i really hope a democrat get to the white house come november. clinton and obama are great candidate but i oppose dynasty politics so i will go for obama (unfortunately, i cant vote, am not American. bloging from UK)

Samuel   January 31st, 2008 9:26 pm ET

Bill,

I don't see it, this patitude after platitude doesn't show this debate as being better. Nor does CNN doing all the name dropping showing the actors in the audience.

ANGEL MOSCOSO   January 31st, 2008 9:26 pm ET

Best line of the debate: "it took a Clinton to clean up the first Bush's mess; it'll take another Clinton to clean the second Bush's mess"

Sam   January 31st, 2008 9:26 pm ET

why is Wolf trying so hard to pit these two against one another? By using the word "swipe" he has basically said that Obama is attacking Hillary. Wolf I'm sure it would be "great TV" to see these two fight, but it does not do anything to serve us the voters, so please LAY OFF!

Barb in Dallas   January 31st, 2008 9:26 pm ET

The Democratic party AND civility are the big winners tonight! It is very refreshing.

keith landreth   January 31st, 2008 9:26 pm ET

Why should Democrats or Republicans Vote For a man That Will Not Salute TheFlag Of the United States

Justin McKamey   January 31st, 2008 9:26 pm ET

A full withdrawal from Iraq would result in failure. Failure on the war in terror, and also failure to the Iraqi people. We messed up by going there. We made things better, but it's not exactly perfect, and probably never will be. If we pull out immediately and have no occupancy there, the country will go down and the established government will fail and we as a country and as a power would be under attack again.

Rad   January 31st, 2008 9:26 pm ET

Why Wolf Blitzer so pro Clinton. How come he find its imperative to point out "swipes". This debate appears to be loaded in Clinton's favor to begin with.

njeri   January 31st, 2008 9:26 pm ET

It is hard to make a choice. They are being so civil and nice to each other. I am a Black woman and I will most definitely vote for Hillary Clinton without hesitating.

Maureen   January 31st, 2008 9:26 pm ET

It really isn't that hard to decide….who can beat the republican candidate? Hillary is who the republicans want to go up against because they know they can beat her. Obama can beat any of the republicans!

paul   January 31st, 2008 9:26 pm ET

obama should add the positive effect his consistent position on iraq will have on negotiations with neighbors of Iraq, contrary to hillary's. why doesnt he do this?

Diane Ward   January 31st, 2008 9:26 pm ET

As a woman CEO I wonder who has been coaching Hillary on the "laugh" issue. To be taken seriously in power sitautions she is going to need to get rid of the laugh…how can she be taken serious when she is front of a world leader - gets nervous and starts with that nervous laugh? How will she change that behavior if she is president.

Joseph Davidson, San Diego, California   January 31st, 2008 9:25 pm ET

Wolf rides again! His bias towards Hillary is sick!!!!!!

Sharon   January 31st, 2008 9:25 pm ET

Go Hillary! She sounds awesome! And I love the Clinton cleaning up after the Bush comment!

Susan   January 31st, 2008 9:25 pm ET

Barack is amazing. He is doing so great. Not the same Barack we saw at any other debate.

Clinton has no credibility and is trying too hard.

frank   January 31st, 2008 9:25 pm ET

this not a debate its a political speech affair. no controversy. its a love affair

Mike   January 31st, 2008 9:25 pm ET

I know, both are impressing me, I was for Edwards, leaning towards Hillary but Barak is impressive.

Justin McKamey   January 31st, 2008 9:25 pm ET

A full withdrawl from Iraq would result in failure. Failure on the war in terror, and also failure to the Iraqi people. We messed up by going there. We made things better, but it's not exactly perfect, and probably never will be. If we pull out immediately and have no occupancy there, the country will go down and the established government will fail and we as a country and as a power would be under attack again.

Krishna   January 31st, 2008 9:25 pm ET

I couldn't agree with you more. I'm getting a headache by concentrating so hard to spot the differences between these two.

Karen   January 31st, 2008 9:25 pm ET

the best ever soundbite! It took a clinton to repair the country from the first bush and it will take a clinton to fix the problems of the sedcond bush!
What a HIT! You go girl! You won my vote!

Darlene   January 31st, 2008 9:25 pm ET

I disagree with Hilary Clinton. If the first Clinton cleaned up after the first Bush, how did the second Bush get into the white house? Also, she mentioned that a woman as US President would be the greatest example of change in America and the world. I would like to point out that the US is now playing catch up to many countries who have already had female leaders and so this is a phenomenon in the US, not the world.

Anonymous   January 31st, 2008 9:25 pm ET

What will Bill Clinton's role be in the White House if Hillary is elected? She played a large role in his administration….are we electing just Hillary or do we need to consider whether or not we do want President Clinton back in the oval office?

John Reineck   January 31st, 2008 9:25 pm ET

I think Republicans like myself watch the debate because we want to understand how these two democrates plan to do what they promise to do. What I have learn so far tonight is that I will pay more taxes, I will get less health care, the government will take more control over more areas of my life and I might not be as safe tomorrow as I am today.

Richy   January 31st, 2008 9:24 pm ET

Yes very much so. Its the Democrats' night for sure but don't you think Clinton has a slight edge so far?

William-Jose Velez   January 31st, 2008 9:24 pm ET

How can I ask for CNN to ask about the Puerto Rico status issue?

Laura   January 31st, 2008 9:24 pm ET

It is obvious to me that it has already been decided that there will be a Clinton/Obama dem. ticket.
This is not a "debate" — this is a lovefest. It has been agree that neither will inflict any kind of mortal blow on the other. They are ready for the general election.

Di   January 31st, 2008 9:24 pm ET

Loved the "it takes a Clinton to clean up after a Bush" line. This woman is amazing polished, prepared, nuanced and smart.

Chelle   January 31st, 2008 9:24 pm ET

I'm all for OBAMA but I must say that this is the best I've seen Clinton. Regardless of her prior offenses, she is doing well tonight. However, Obama is realistic and can easily poke holes in her policy choices. Tough decision for those on the fence…

Parag   January 31st, 2008 9:24 pm ET

This debate is the best we so far had making choice difficult, hence advantage to Hillary..She would continue lead and get dem ticket…No doubt.

Kevin   January 31st, 2008 9:24 pm ET

Again, Wolf with the "Hillary, that was a clea swipe at you." Wolf just wants a fight!

Ron Alcorn   January 31st, 2008 9:24 pm ET

Hillary wins the body language hands down. Her inclusion of Maxine Waters was strong.

Alexandria   January 31st, 2008 9:23 pm ET

You are absolutely correct. This is an excellent debate between them candidates in an elegant manner. But the problem still exist, who will I vote for from the democratic party.

Such a hard choice to make.

Bobby   January 31st, 2008 9:23 pm ET

Wolf needs to quit trying to stir the pot between Obama and Clinton. Lay off already.

Joshua   January 31st, 2008 9:23 pm ET

This may come down to what football recruiters call the "intangibles": the extraneous factors that help sell a recruit as a better fit for a program over another. I honestly think there are slight policy differences that make me favor one over the other (no fun if I tell you how I'm leaning, I like surprises) but civility and calmness are showing just how far the Democratic party has come in turning itself around.

Mary   January 31st, 2008 9:23 pm ET

Hillary was perfect in her response about the Kennedy endorsement when she encouraged the voters to look closely at the two people who are on the ballot, just she and Obama. And her comment about a Clinton cleaning up after a Bush received a great amount of applause. Very good and civil debate tonight.

James   January 31st, 2008 9:22 pm ET

Clinton is only there because of her name, and everyone knows. The Clinton name buys connections and name recognition.

This is no different than George W. Bush, who is an idiot, but sailed into the presidency based on name and connections alone.

How about we choose a president based on their character and merit?????

Omar   January 31st, 2008 9:22 pm ET

Bill i told you that you are getting smarter
i will hire you to run my campaign for president in 20………………….

janisr   January 31st, 2008 9:22 pm ET

no uncertainty. barack obama.

Murry   January 31st, 2008 9:22 pm ET

A Clinton may be able to clean up after a Bush but he wasn't able to keep a Bush from returning to the White House.

NickNas   January 31st, 2008 9:22 pm ET

It is SOOO hard to sound impartial but I don't recognize this Hillary. Calm, Polite, Non Agressive.

I think Slick Billy has taught her well, but it is not genuine. They ARE Master Politicians.

Marggie   January 31st, 2008 9:22 pm ET

Bill - couldn't disagree more. How about side with the candidate who actually answers the questions. Very disappointed by Obama's answers… he is very tangential, pulling in one liners that draw minimal applause without actually stating a thesis and supporting it.

BRM   January 31st, 2008 9:21 pm ET

Bill, I think that it's difficult for the undecided voters. However, by this time, you either love Obama or Hillary.

Hillary '08!

K,FL   January 31st, 2008 9:21 pm ET

I have to agree the Democratic Party is the Big Winner Tonight Like i said the best choice will be a Clinton/Obama Ticket when all this end… maybe as soon as After Feb 5th.. Tonight i Must say Im very Proud to be a DEMOCRAT!

elaine   January 31st, 2008 9:21 pm ET

Come on Bill, she had a good retort.

dave   January 31st, 2008 9:21 pm ET

Oh come on Bill. That may be what you call pithy but it was poignant and the timing was impeccable. the applause meter was off the scale and I had to turn the tv sound down.

Percy   January 31st, 2008 9:21 pm ET

They are both strong in some aspects. Overall Hillary is the most complete package. She has the experience and we just can not discount that, it is critical. Obama would make a fine VP and win by a landslide following that. For Obama supporters….what would be wrong with having Obama for 16 years?

Mike   January 31st, 2008 9:20 pm ET

So far I have not heard a thing from hillary that I haven't heard before. for example….she USED to say that she would get our troops out by 2013! Now she say "As quickly as possible!?!?!?!?!?

Sigh…..

EMO   January 31st, 2008 9:20 pm ET

Since 1980, a Bush or Clinton has been in the White House–the questioner was right, this is a joke and an affront to democracy. At this point, I would vote for a toaster. CHANGE CHANGE CHANGE OBAMA 08!!!!

JohnS   January 31st, 2008 9:20 pm ET

Bill take note, Hillary is the ONLY one who brought in GENDER into the debate: "The First WOMAN President." What is this gender and race set of issues?

Amber   January 31st, 2008 9:20 pm ET

"It takes a Clinton to clean up after a Bush"

I love it! Go Hillary!

DemFan   January 31st, 2008 9:20 pm ET

I just wish they gave Barack a chance to answer that question as well of old vs. new in regards to Bush/Clinton/Bush/Clinton

Austin   January 31st, 2008 9:20 pm ET

Comment of the night goes to Senator Clinton!

Casey   January 31st, 2008 9:19 pm ET

The choice is clear: we need both of them in office!

Joe H   January 31st, 2008 9:19 pm ET

A good debate… BUT…. Obama is being held accountable for the nuance of his responses — explain this, explain that. And that's a good thing. However, Clinton is getting away with shirking each question — deflection, obfuscation, and redirection. It's Clinton's 'canned phrases' versus Obama's thorough, yet honest explanation. Blitzer needs to do a better job holding Clinton accountable. It's just not happening.

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room. Download this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

Follow us on Twitter

CNN on TwitterGet Ticker updates the moment they appear online via the Web, SMS, or instant messages.
Follow politicalticker

Categories
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNN makes reasonable efforts to review all comments prior to posting and CNN may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2008 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.