<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What do you think of tonight&#039;s Democratic debate?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/</link>
	<description>All politics, all the time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:07:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Helene</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-440512</link>
		<dc:creator>Helene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 17:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-440512</guid>
		<description>1. Immigration - I agree with H. clinton
    Obama when he stated -- Oh immigration is not teh cause of unemployement - he is right this is not teh sole cause -HOWEVER this is not what  H. clinton said - 
That tells me he does not listen, does not understand or distort what people say -- Bad sign as far as I am concerned.

2. Health - I agree with H. Clinton
    Obama was back tracking on same items --  POOR people will NOT buy health insurance if the premiums are lower - SOMETHING else needs to happen. Not al parents will care for their children - I see what many parents of children at the high school my children go to  do and do not do for their children.
I woudl even do something else than what H. Clinton is usggesting. Obama is far behind.

3. Iraq war -- I agree with H. clinton -- 
     Only fool never chnage their mind.
     Intelligent people makes mistake and correct themsleves.
     Obama - saying that is right from the start - is scaring. Does it think he always will be right?  Thsi is a bad sign.
But then he said that he does not want to surround himself with yes people -- Will be interesting whether he can listen to people with different view.

It was great that they were civilized with each other -- for me thsi is a MUST for our country -- Addressing issues this what we need. 
Whether soemone is credible or not should not be their discussion. Thsi needs to be left to other people.
teh question to H.Clinton about her husband - I thought was not fair - Would soemone ask that question to a man! - hmm not sure
Overall H. Clinton is the one that is more realistic about how things work etc..
With regard to dealing with dictators -- I am not sure how they will be successuful - They will need to be able to surround themselves by people who undertand what make dictators &quot;tic&quot; and how to bets approach them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Immigration &#8211; I agree with H. clinton<br />
    Obama when he stated - Oh immigration is not teh cause of unemployement &#8211; he is right this is not teh sole cause -HOWEVER this is not what  H. clinton said &#8211;<br />
That tells me he does not listen, does not understand or distort what people say - Bad sign as far as I am concerned.</p>
<p>2. Health &#8211; I agree with H. Clinton<br />
    Obama was back tracking on same items -  POOR people will NOT buy health insurance if the premiums are lower &#8211; SOMETHING else needs to happen. Not al parents will care for their children &#8211; I see what many parents of children at the high school my children go to  do and do not do for their children.<br />
I woudl even do something else than what H. Clinton is usggesting. Obama is far behind.</p>
<p>3. Iraq war - I agree with H. clinton -<br />
     Only fool never chnage their mind.<br />
     Intelligent people makes mistake and correct themsleves.<br />
     Obama &#8211; saying that is right from the start &#8211; is scaring. Does it think he always will be right?  Thsi is a bad sign.<br />
But then he said that he does not want to surround himself with yes people - Will be interesting whether he can listen to people with different view.</p>
<p>It was great that they were civilized with each other - for me thsi is a MUST for our country - Addressing issues this what we need.<br />
Whether soemone is credible or not should not be their discussion. Thsi needs to be left to other people.<br />
teh question to H.Clinton about her husband &#8211; I thought was not fair &#8211; Would soemone ask that question to a man! &#8211; hmm not sure<br />
Overall H. Clinton is the one that is more realistic about how things work etc..<br />
With regard to dealing with dictators - I am not sure how they will be successuful &#8211; They will need to be able to surround themselves by people who undertand what make dictators "tic" and how to bets approach them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hayden Berkeley</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-435970</link>
		<dc:creator>Hayden Berkeley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-435970</guid>
		<description>I agree with Barack Obama&#039;s views on health care. I think it is a great plan to mandate health care for children and let adults have a choice of whether or not they have health isurance because children don&#039;t know enough to make the decisions for themselves, but adults do, and if they choose not to have insurance, then they have accepted to consequences, you can&#039;t just make EVERYBODY buy health insurance like Hillary Clinton&#039;s plan, some people can&#039;t afford it, and even if they can, maybe they want to use the money for something else. Mandating health insurance for everybody is violating a person&#039;s pursuit of happiness as well as the 14th Amendment of life, LIBERTY, and property. You can&#039;t make someone pay for something they don&#039;t want to pay for, that&#039;s not liberty.
As for personality, I just don&#039;t think Hillary Clinton is a likable person. I know that you don&#039;t vote based on how much you like a person but how much you agree with their issue, but there is something about her that makes me think she cannot handle all of the pressure that comes with becoming president. Something that troubles me is: Is she going to run the country properly, or is she going to have Bill Clinton behind the scene? If so, is that necessarily a good thing? 
I&#039;m glad Obama was finally able to really discuss his views on various issues and tells Americans why he should win: not because &quot;he wants change&quot;, but because he is a truly a great leader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Barack Obama's views on health care. I think it is a great plan to mandate health care for children and let adults have a choice of whether or not they have health isurance because children don't know enough to make the decisions for themselves, but adults do, and if they choose not to have insurance, then they have accepted to consequences, you can't just make EVERYBODY buy health insurance like Hillary Clinton's plan, some people can't afford it, and even if they can, maybe they want to use the money for something else. Mandating health insurance for everybody is violating a person's pursuit of happiness as well as the 14th Amendment of life, LIBERTY, and property. You can't make someone pay for something they don't want to pay for, that's not liberty.<br />
As for personality, I just don't think Hillary Clinton is a likable person. I know that you don't vote based on how much you like a person but how much you agree with their issue, but there is something about her that makes me think she cannot handle all of the pressure that comes with becoming president. Something that troubles me is: Is she going to run the country properly, or is she going to have Bill Clinton behind the scene? If so, is that necessarily a good thing?<br />
I'm glad Obama was finally able to really discuss his views on various issues and tells Americans why he should win: not because "he wants change", but because he is a truly a great leader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-432086</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 15:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-432086</guid>
		<description>Hallo Americans, especially democrates...well we are following up your interesting campaign.

On the whole, the Democratic Party has gained  a lot. Evidently, the democrates look younger, more energetic and fresh compared to the old republicans. 

Obama seems to summerise all this well...though Clinton still remains an attractive choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hallo Americans, especially democrates...well we are following up your interesting campaign.</p>
<p>On the whole, the Democratic Party has gained  a lot. Evidently, the democrates look younger, more energetic and fresh compared to the old republicans. </p>
<p>Obama seems to summerise all this well...though Clinton still remains an attractive choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason4hillary</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-431084</link>
		<dc:creator>jason4hillary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 08:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-431084</guid>
		<description>go hillary i though she was right on target .obama is not ready yet . he would make a good vice prez,at the most . i like clintion/edwards ticket .now that sounds like a change.hillary08</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>go hillary i though she was right on target .obama is not ready yet . he would make a good vice prez,at the most . i like clintion/edwards ticket .now that sounds like a change.hillary08</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sniknam</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-430198</link>
		<dc:creator>sniknam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-430198</guid>
		<description>I agree; Hillary dodged questions as usual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree; Hillary dodged questions as usual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MC</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429632</link>
		<dc:creator>MC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 04:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429632</guid>
		<description>Obama clearly won on a number of points.  First, his healthcare plan sounded more practical and appealing to America as a whole without the govt mandates.  Although she was very knowledgable about the healthcare issue, her plan sounded too unwieldy and impractical.     

Second, his vote on Iraq compared  with hers and the explanation of its implications on the White House was outstanding.  These are important decisions that should not be made in haste without considering the long term consequences.  Bottom line is that she made a decision based on political reasons instead of what she thought was right.   Obama needs to clearly state that he made a decision not because it was popular but because it was the right thing to do.     

Obama made a clear distiction between himself and HRC:  His ability to work with other people.  We need somebody who can make this government work, not somebody who is going to create a partisan environment.  Sen. Obama&#039;s comment about inspiring Americans and everybody who works for the federal government to work to make their country better was a huge statement in terms of understanding what the federal government is all about:  Helping Americans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama clearly won on a number of points.  First, his healthcare plan sounded more practical and appealing to America as a whole without the govt mandates.  Although she was very knowledgable about the healthcare issue, her plan sounded too unwieldy and impractical.     </p>
<p>Second, his vote on Iraq compared  with hers and the explanation of its implications on the White House was outstanding.  These are important decisions that should not be made in haste without considering the long term consequences.  Bottom line is that she made a decision based on political reasons instead of what she thought was right.   Obama needs to clearly state that he made a decision not because it was popular but because it was the right thing to do.     </p>
<p>Obama made a clear distiction between himself and HRC:  His ability to work with other people.  We need somebody who can make this government work, not somebody who is going to create a partisan environment.  Sen. Obama's comment about inspiring Americans and everybody who works for the federal government to work to make their country better was a huge statement in terms of understanding what the federal government is all about:  Helping Americans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: All4Clinton</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429629</link>
		<dc:creator>All4Clinton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 04:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429629</guid>
		<description>Obama is certainly very oratorical and charming. He reminds of Bill Clinton when Bill was young. However, this country need a practical and visionary leader. I have seen enough an ideological one in Bush style, and does not want to see another one. There is a fundamental difference between ideological and inspirational. It is going to be extremely challenging to get a country under such kind of condition back on track. With all those bruises that Hillary went through, she is ready and have learned how to deal with partisan. Remember, even though democrats won 2006 elections, this country is still pretty much moving in the old direction. Why? They need a leader who can come up with practical solutions. Not beautiful words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is certainly very oratorical and charming. He reminds of Bill Clinton when Bill was young. However, this country need a practical and visionary leader. I have seen enough an ideological one in Bush style, and does not want to see another one. There is a fundamental difference between ideological and inspirational. It is going to be extremely challenging to get a country under such kind of condition back on track. With all those bruises that Hillary went through, she is ready and have learned how to deal with partisan. Remember, even though democrats won 2006 elections, this country is still pretty much moving in the old direction. Why? They need a leader who can come up with practical solutions. Not beautiful words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandra Scott</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429626</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandra Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 04:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429626</guid>
		<description>It is evident that Hillary has been well prepared by her team.  Her deportment and delivery now emulate Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is evident that Hillary has been well prepared by her team.  Her deportment and delivery now emulate Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429258</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 04:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429258</guid>
		<description>It sure is disheartening to read about all the individuals who are going to vote for Obama simply because they want change and not a Bush or Clinton in the White House.  In normal times maybe such a change would be appropriate but being idealistic alone does not make one a good candidate much less the best qualified to accomplish the incredibly difficult task at hand, which is to turn our country around.  It seems that in these times we need an individual that has a proven track record under similar circumstances and that is Hillary Clinton.  Obama is a very likeable individual with a lot of charisma and certainly a great future leader but right here, right now, we need someone who&#039;s been there, done that!
Please put the emotions and sentiments aside, think about the huge deficit, the mortgage crisis and the continuous decline of the dollar, issues that affect all of us negatively one way or another.  If we do not make the right choice in this election, we could be seeing the end of our economy as we know it and I am not only refering to our government but also as individuals!
Obama supporters, how about Vice President!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sure is disheartening to read about all the individuals who are going to vote for Obama simply because they want change and not a Bush or Clinton in the White House.  In normal times maybe such a change would be appropriate but being idealistic alone does not make one a good candidate much less the best qualified to accomplish the incredibly difficult task at hand, which is to turn our country around.  It seems that in these times we need an individual that has a proven track record under similar circumstances and that is Hillary Clinton.  Obama is a very likeable individual with a lot of charisma and certainly a great future leader but right here, right now, we need someone who's been there, done that!<br />
Please put the emotions and sentiments aside, think about the huge deficit, the mortgage crisis and the continuous decline of the dollar, issues that affect all of us negatively one way or another.  If we do not make the right choice in this election, we could be seeing the end of our economy as we know it and I am not only refering to our government but also as individuals!<br />
Obama supporters, how about Vice President!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429215</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 04:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429215</guid>
		<description>The debate tonight was so polished. You could tell it was in Hollywood.. And to watch Hillary dodge questions like she does so well, it is scary to hear the critic&#039;s say how well she did..Obma cleary did better and would have hoped for more harder question&#039;s for Hillary so we could have watched her weasel out from a truefull answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The debate tonight was so polished. You could tell it was in Hollywood.. And to watch Hillary dodge questions like she does so well, it is scary to hear the critic's say how well she did..Obma cleary did better and would have hoped for more harder question's for Hillary so we could have watched her weasel out from a truefull answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gift</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429160</link>
		<dc:creator>Gift</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429160</guid>
		<description>Clinton may know the best way to deliver her not so good case but 

Obama had the best content. We all just need to listen and see that he made the best articulate answers. She just has been in the game long enough to know how to say things without being straight but appear to have content.

Its all an act.

Obama is real

Yes we can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clinton may know the best way to deliver her not so good case but </p>
<p>Obama had the best content. We all just need to listen and see that he made the best articulate answers. She just has been in the game long enough to know how to say things without being straight but appear to have content.</p>
<p>Its all an act.</p>
<p>Obama is real</p>
<p>Yes we can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429156</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429156</guid>
		<description>He kept going negative she kept giving straight answers. He cracked jokes and had good one liners while she answered everything without dodging anything . She won my vote</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He kept going negative she kept giving straight answers. He cracked jokes and had good one liners while she answered everything without dodging anything . She won my vote</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warren</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429153</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429153</guid>
		<description>Would Hillary even be considered if she had not spent 8 years in the White House.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would Hillary even be considered if she had not spent 8 years in the White House.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429145</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429145</guid>
		<description>You people have no idea what was really involved in the resolution that idiot Bush turned to his own agenda.  Obama, can talk smart but it takes action and Hillary is the best in the race.  

Did you all notice that other Kennedys support Senator  Hillary Clinton?  Teddy is just mad at Bill because Bill wouldn&#039;t let Teddy take away his right of free speech!
The whole Teddy/Caroline Kennedy was revenge.

As far as the question someone prior to this comment made of Hillary &#039;How will she lower costs?&quot;  Well, I ask, how will Obama lower costs?

Remember - It is the economy that is the most important now.  We will end the war in a few months, but what about the economy -  What will these troops be coming home to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You people have no idea what was really involved in the resolution that idiot Bush turned to his own agenda.  Obama, can talk smart but it takes action and Hillary is the best in the race.  </p>
<p>Did you all notice that other Kennedys support Senator  Hillary Clinton?  Teddy is just mad at Bill because Bill wouldn't let Teddy take away his right of free speech!<br />
The whole Teddy/Caroline Kennedy was revenge.</p>
<p>As far as the question someone prior to this comment made of Hillary 'How will she lower costs?"  Well, I ask, how will Obama lower costs?</p>
<p>Remember &#8211; It is the economy that is the most important now.  We will end the war in a few months, but what about the economy &#8211;  What will these troops be coming home to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: getoutthevote!</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429141</link>
		<dc:creator>getoutthevote!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429141</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you, Bernard.  I mentioned abortion and I got censored.  I don&#039;t get this.  I mentioned Republicans in a much more complimentary way than some people are writing about Hilary and I got censored.  I was trying to welcome a social conservative to our party.  She described herself that way.  I got censored.  What&#039;s the deal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm with you, Bernard.  I mentioned abortion and I got censored.  I don't get this.  I mentioned Republicans in a much more complimentary way than some people are writing about Hilary and I got censored.  I was trying to welcome a social conservative to our party.  She described herself that way.  I got censored.  What's the deal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David for USA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429139</link>
		<dc:creator>David for USA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429139</guid>
		<description>Does any one notice that the questions were skewed to Clinton. Has if a underline purpose for Clinton to settle her negatives before Super Tuesday. If any thing worth our consideration tonight is the number of questions posed to Obama which is significantly less that those to Clinton? Even the questions posed to Obama involved in most part, clearing the air for Clinton. 

The stage was clearly set for Clinton by CNN. And Wolf Blitzer is clearly seen carrying forth their agenda.

Obama had to politely ask Wolf to speed it up and get to the other issues.

And please remember. No question was ask to Obama from the emails that were read. All went to Clinton. Do you really think no one in America had a question for Obama. And the fact was there was only two people in the debate.

They did not even give Obama a chance to respond to her comment about cleaning up after Bush. They speedily went to commercial. 

This is injustice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does any one notice that the questions were skewed to Clinton. Has if a underline purpose for Clinton to settle her negatives before Super Tuesday. If any thing worth our consideration tonight is the number of questions posed to Obama which is significantly less that those to Clinton? Even the questions posed to Obama involved in most part, clearing the air for Clinton. </p>
<p>The stage was clearly set for Clinton by CNN. And Wolf Blitzer is clearly seen carrying forth their agenda.</p>
<p>Obama had to politely ask Wolf to speed it up and get to the other issues.</p>
<p>And please remember. No question was ask to Obama from the emails that were read. All went to Clinton. Do you really think no one in America had a question for Obama. And the fact was there was only two people in the debate.</p>
<p>They did not even give Obama a chance to respond to her comment about cleaning up after Bush. They speedily went to commercial. </p>
<p>This is injustice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenna</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429119</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429119</guid>
		<description>AHMED no disrespect but i want health care and someone who can run the country i am not voting for someone to make me FEEL GOOD or LIFT my spirits.....they have medication for that LOL  I want someone who knows what SHE IS DOING that person is Hillary Clinton. I am 52 years old and don&#039;t have time in my life to wait for OBAMA to learn the ropes of washington.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AHMED no disrespect but i want health care and someone who can run the country i am not voting for someone to make me FEEL GOOD or LIFT my spirits.....they have medication for that LOL  I want someone who knows what SHE IS DOING that person is Hillary Clinton. I am 52 years old and don't have time in my life to wait for OBAMA to learn the ropes of washington.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sis</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429118</link>
		<dc:creator>Sis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429118</guid>
		<description>How many times have we heard hind sight is 20/20....Of course if we could all predict the outcome consequence of every decision we have made...we would be god like......Well....that being said weakens Barack&#039;s comment of &quot;Being Right on day one&quot;....now who can? That would be narcissistic to think one can be right on every decision.....So, Barack needs to review some of his decisions that resulted in negative consequences,. He has made them!  I will not support someone who portrays that on day one he is Right! Plus one of his other comments was having staff in his white house that will be able to help him acknowledge he is not always right......Wow! He will need a 24 hr counselor for that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many times have we heard hind sight is 20/20....Of course if we could all predict the outcome consequence of every decision we have made...we would be god like......Well....that being said weakens Barack's comment of "Being Right on day one"....now who can? That would be narcissistic to think one can be right on every decision.....So, Barack needs to review some of his decisions that resulted in negative consequences,. He has made them!  I will not support someone who portrays that on day one he is Right! Plus one of his other comments was having staff in his white house that will be able to help him acknowledge he is not always right......Wow! He will need a 24 hr counselor for that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rose</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429103</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429103</guid>
		<description>Obama/Clinton ticket !! Yeah Remember Kennedy/Johnson. That was a winning ticket. Change Good for America. Old/Young seems the same old story Bush/Quail amost laughable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama/Clinton ticket !! Yeah Remember Kennedy/Johnson. That was a winning ticket. Change Good for America. Old/Young seems the same old story Bush/Quail amost laughable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429053</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429053</guid>
		<description>NO MORE Clinton&#039;s...NEED Change? Go Obama!

Obama/Edward is the ticket!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NO MORE Clinton's...NEED Change? Go Obama!</p>
<p>Obama/Edward is the ticket!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billrieken</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429052</link>
		<dc:creator>billrieken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429052</guid>
		<description>The Senate was put in a very awkward position in the Fall of 2002 -- what if they had voted &quot;no&quot; to the use of force?  Saddam Hussein would have laughed at George Bush&#039;s threat of military action ... at least that was the phoney argument the Bush administration was making at the time (as I recall).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Senate was put in a very awkward position in the Fall of 2002 - what if they had voted "no" to the use of force?  Saddam Hussein would have laughed at George Bush's threat of military action ... at least that was the phoney argument the Bush administration was making at the time (as I recall).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: juanita griffin</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429045</link>
		<dc:creator>juanita griffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429045</guid>
		<description>I think Hillary gets my vote. I have finally decided. GO HILLARY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Hillary gets my vote. I have finally decided. GO HILLARY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429044</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429044</guid>
		<description>What a great debate between two excellent candidates. The biggest problem is Wolf. With all the great reporters at CNN I think you could have found a better moderator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a great debate between two excellent candidates. The biggest problem is Wolf. With all the great reporters at CNN I think you could have found a better moderator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amnesty is Treason</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429028</link>
		<dc:creator>Amnesty is Treason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429028</guid>
		<description>it baffles me as to how all you folk could vote for a treasonous candidate that sell&#039;s out their own citizens so they and their corporate buddies can get richer; pure stupidity at its best!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it baffles me as to how all you folk could vote for a treasonous candidate that sell's out their own citizens so they and their corporate buddies can get richer; pure stupidity at its best!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ayanna</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429022</link>
		<dc:creator>Ayanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429022</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary wants manditory health care weather you can afford it or not. That sounds more like a universal health SCARE. She’s of the same thought as Otto Von Bismark who initiated the mandatory health care system in Germany in 1880. He held conservative monarchial views. Health insurance cannot be like manditory car insurance. At least if you can't afford car insurance you can get rid of your car.</p>
<p>Obama supports a public insurance system more similar to Canada which allows individuals to choose between the new public insurance program or from among private insurance plans that meet certain coverage standards.”  His plan is closer to getting health care in the right direction. America should have gotten started on universal health care years ago and she would not be in the mess that she’s in right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429020</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429020</guid>
		<description>Looking at these as the Democratic choices for President of America is quite frightening. Where do either of them come to be able to handle the enormous pressures and resopnsibility that it takes to be a true leader of the supposed strongest and most powerful nation in the world??? A leader must have vision, strength of charachter, integrity, and true self sacrifice for his nation....Cut me a break...Neither of these make the grade...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking at these as the Democratic choices for President of America is quite frightening. Where do either of them come to be able to handle the enormous pressures and resopnsibility that it takes to be a true leader of the supposed strongest and most powerful nation in the world??? A leader must have vision, strength of charachter, integrity, and true self sacrifice for his nation....Cut me a break...Neither of these make the grade...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andria</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429018</link>
		<dc:creator>Andria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429018</guid>
		<description>What is with a Hollywood audience?  I think it makes a mockery out of a presidential debate to discuss America&#039;s hardships in front of an audience of people who don&#039;t live in the &#039;real&#039; world.  Poor to no thought was given to this venue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is with a Hollywood audience?  I think it makes a mockery out of a presidential debate to discuss America's hardships in front of an audience of people who don't live in the 'real' world.  Poor to no thought was given to this venue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rka</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429019</link>
		<dc:creator>rka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429019</guid>
		<description>I hope that question leading to one Clinton clean up after Bush line was a set up. 
She has used that line before. Did they tee one up for her?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope that question leading to one Clinton clean up after Bush line was a set up.<br />
She has used that line before. Did they tee one up for her?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429016</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429016</guid>
		<description>Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton.  Give me a break.  With over 250 million people in the United States, can&#039;t we elect someone not named Bush or Clinton.  Go Obama!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton.  Give me a break.  With over 250 million people in the United States, can't we elect someone not named Bush or Clinton.  Go Obama!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A. Cancela</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429013</link>
		<dc:creator>A. Cancela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429013</guid>
		<description>When I saw both candidates on the CNN debate tonight I felt like I was looking at our next President, and Vice-President.  In my opinion, a Clinton-Obama ticket is definitely the winning ticket for the upcoming election.

Both candidates seem to have similar platforms, but even their differences seem to complment each other.  Their election would be the epitomy of the &quot;checks and balances&quot; that our country is supposed to have been built upon.  Clinton represents the experience needed for the United States to regain a sound footing globally, and Obama represents the unity needed to get there.  

I am confident that if these two powerhouses decided to come together it would be a win-win situation for this country.  It would mean that America would finally have a voice in the White House, and thereby ensure that the issues and needs of this country would actually be met.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I saw both candidates on the CNN debate tonight I felt like I was looking at our next President, and Vice-President.  In my opinion, a Clinton-Obama ticket is definitely the winning ticket for the upcoming election.</p>
<p>Both candidates seem to have similar platforms, but even their differences seem to complment each other.  Their election would be the epitomy of the "checks and balances" that our country is supposed to have been built upon.  Clinton represents the experience needed for the United States to regain a sound footing globally, and Obama represents the unity needed to get there.  </p>
<p>I am confident that if these two powerhouses decided to come together it would be a win-win situation for this country.  It would mean that America would finally have a voice in the White House, and thereby ensure that the issues and needs of this country would actually be met.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gricelda</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429005</link>
		<dc:creator>Gricelda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429005</guid>
		<description>Obama clearly is more focused on the real issues at hand.  Clinton is more focused on what she has done in the past than what needs to be done in the future!

They both did a great job on putting the differences a side and letting people see beyond the bickering and focus on the elections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama clearly is more focused on the real issues at hand.  Clinton is more focused on what she has done in the past than what needs to be done in the future!</p>
<p>They both did a great job on putting the differences a side and letting people see beyond the bickering and focus on the elections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Truth</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429004</link>
		<dc:creator>The Truth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-429004</guid>
		<description>I loved it.  I&#039;m proud to be a Democrat and support Hillary 100%..but I know after tonight, that no matter who wins the nomination I will cast my vote for the democratic candidate in the presidential election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved it.  I'm proud to be a Democrat and support Hillary 100%..but I know after tonight, that no matter who wins the nomination I will cast my vote for the democratic candidate in the presidential election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Van Guiragossian</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-428999</link>
		<dc:creator>Van Guiragossian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-428999</guid>
		<description>I was very impressed with both  Senator Clinton and Senator Obama in their answers of solving the problems of our country. They both understand the problems we are facing and I believe that either one of them is capable to solve the problems we are facing.   I believe they will make a great team and hopefully they will run as &quot;President and Vice President &quot;  Team. They will unite the country and make the critical decisions for our nation.

Van Guiragossian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was very impressed with both  Senator Clinton and Senator Obama in their answers of solving the problems of our country. They both understand the problems we are facing and I believe that either one of them is capable to solve the problems we are facing.   I believe they will make a great team and hopefully they will run as "President and Vice President "  Team. They will unite the country and make the critical decisions for our nation.</p>
<p>Van Guiragossian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MARY ALTORFER</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-428996</link>
		<dc:creator>MARY ALTORFER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-428996</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sick of listening to that pompous hypocrite Bill Bennett commenting on the debate and insisting that Hillary Clinton won.  As a Republican, he would like nothing better than to run against Hillary Clinton.  Go Obama!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm sick of listening to that pompous hypocrite Bill Bennett commenting on the debate and insisting that Hillary Clinton won.  As a Republican, he would like nothing better than to run against Hillary Clinton.  Go Obama!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-428992</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-428992</guid>
		<description>Obama was awesome when speaking about Iraq.  Hillary kept saying she voted for inspectors, which is NOT TRUE.  It was an authorization of war and she knew exactly what she was voting for.  The inspectors comment is simply a cover up to her mistake in voting for war.  Why can&#039;t she admit she made a mistake like Edwards did?

GO OBAMA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama was awesome when speaking about Iraq.  Hillary kept saying she voted for inspectors, which is NOT TRUE.  It was an authorization of war and she knew exactly what she was voting for.  The inspectors comment is simply a cover up to her mistake in voting for war.  Why can't she admit she made a mistake like Edwards did?</p>
<p>GO OBAMA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B Swiader</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-428990</link>
		<dc:creator>B Swiader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-428990</guid>
		<description>For the debate, I think they both wanted to show unity and get away from the past few days picture and spouse remarks. Both it seems wanted to express their pluses and points of view rather that talk about the other perceived negatives.

I think they both did a good job in defending what they stood for but thought they both could have contered just a little harder of their differences. I thought out of the two, Barack did better with that.

Barack would have the edge, I believe when going against the Republicans on Iraq. (because of his opposition) This will end up being one of the hard differences between parties and should be interesting when it&#039;s party vs party.

I think either would make a great leader for the country and it would be something if it made sense to see both on the final ticket for the Democratic nomination as Pres and VP. Should that happen, I don&#039;t think the Republicans have a combination that could withstand them.

I think it&#039;s great that other countries have the opportunity to see our process either on airwaves, or through the net and am always curious to what they think about all this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the debate, I think they both wanted to show unity and get away from the past few days picture and spouse remarks. Both it seems wanted to express their pluses and points of view rather that talk about the other perceived negatives.</p>
<p>I think they both did a good job in defending what they stood for but thought they both could have contered just a little harder of their differences. I thought out of the two, Barack did better with that.</p>
<p>Barack would have the edge, I believe when going against the Republicans on Iraq. (because of his opposition) This will end up being one of the hard differences between parties and should be interesting when it's party vs party.</p>
<p>I think either would make a great leader for the country and it would be something if it made sense to see both on the final ticket for the Democratic nomination as Pres and VP. Should that happen, I don't think the Republicans have a combination that could withstand them.</p>
<p>I think it's great that other countries have the opportunity to see our process either on airwaves, or through the net and am always curious to what they think about all this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sheryl rogel</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-428989</link>
		<dc:creator>sheryl rogel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-428989</guid>
		<description>I do not want another Clinton in the White House.   If we do return to the Clinton good years, we will return to a time when in reality that good life was bought on credit cards.  Wages did not match our bills at that time and certainly do not presently as wages still have not increased to match the increases of housing, food, health care, and gas costs.  And we are now limited in our access to credit. Check it out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not want another Clinton in the White House.   If we do return to the Clinton good years, we will return to a time when in reality that good life was bought on credit cards.  Wages did not match our bills at that time and certainly do not presently as wages still have not increased to match the increases of housing, food, health care, and gas costs.  And we are now limited in our access to credit. Check it out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Equality</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-428987</link>
		<dc:creator>Equality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-428987</guid>
		<description>I think CNN was very partial in hosting the Debate tonight!  They are controlling who gets more coverage, basically have been dictating and spinning this thing! The are partly to blame why some canidates are not in this thing. Now that Edwards is out they are spinning towards one Candidate.   

One more comment!  It was unnecessary for Hillary to specify the race of the gentlemen in Atlanta in her example of immigration.  IT WAS DIVISIVE especially on that topic and it turned me off!   No other candidate has done that!  It was very low and that has defined has come to define the Clintons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think CNN was very partial in hosting the Debate tonight!  They are controlling who gets more coverage, basically have been dictating and spinning this thing! The are partly to blame why some canidates are not in this thing. Now that Edwards is out they are spinning towards one Candidate.   </p>
<p>One more comment!  It was unnecessary for Hillary to specify the race of the gentlemen in Atlanta in her example of immigration.  IT WAS DIVISIVE especially on that topic and it turned me off!   No other candidate has done that!  It was very low and that has defined has come to define the Clintons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maribel- FOR HILLARY</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-428986</link>
		<dc:creator>Maribel- FOR HILLARY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-428986</guid>
		<description>Way to go HILLARY!! You are the woman for 08.

ALL LATINOS IN TEXAS FOR HILLARY!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way to go HILLARY!! You are the woman for 08.</p>
<p>ALL LATINOS IN TEXAS FOR HILLARY!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-428983</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-428983</guid>
		<description>I prefer the views of Barack Obama overall... he seems more genuine and sincere for the concerns of other people.  I feel he is more believable, and can bring all people together for changes for the greater good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer the views of Barack Obama overall... he seems more genuine and sincere for the concerns of other people.  I feel he is more believable, and can bring all people together for changes for the greater good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shelley</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-428979</link>
		<dc:creator>Shelley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-428979</guid>
		<description>You wanted to know that if Obama could go toe--toe with Clinton (meaning Hillary) ? Well, I&#039;m confident that he gave us the details on why he is clearly the better candidate! He did a great job of explaining his proposed healthcare plan. As a disabled, 38 year old female and mother of 4 I am more confident in his haealthcare plan than Hillary&#039;s plan. Obama also, proved his point that her so-called &quot;experience &quot; does not necessarily prove that she will ultimately do what are the right things for America! Thanks to Bush we can&#039;t afford any more blunders based upon her kind of &quot;experience.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You wanted to know that if Obama could go toe&#8211;toe with Clinton (meaning Hillary) ? Well, I'm confident that he gave us the details on why he is clearly the better candidate! He did a great job of explaining his proposed healthcare plan. As a disabled, 38 year old female and mother of 4 I am more confident in his haealthcare plan than Hillary's plan. Obama also, proved his point that her so-called "experience " does not necessarily prove that she will ultimately do what are the right things for America! Thanks to Bush we can't afford any more blunders based upon her kind of "experience."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: macia</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-428976</link>
		<dc:creator>macia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-428976</guid>
		<description>the debate was not done to get a winner but to allow the candidates to air out their policy proposal to the american people. for those young and inspired obama voters out there, look to substance and talk to grown ups about the facts of life then you will be filtering over all that was said and voting for someone who can get the job done properyly, istead of trying to pick a winner. if you want a movie star go to hollywood. the choices you make today will shape many lives tommorrow. so please stop the nonsence and start asking real questions. hillary was clearly more knowledgeable. 

as for wolf, the media has always been biased agianst Hill so his actions and the questions from politico(the guy is always on cnn) was all desingned to try to give obama an edge. he tried to start a problem but she rose above that . 
the media wants to pick our president like they picked the last one and look what it got us into</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the debate was not done to get a winner but to allow the candidates to air out their policy proposal to the american people. for those young and inspired obama voters out there, look to substance and talk to grown ups about the facts of life then you will be filtering over all that was said and voting for someone who can get the job done properyly, istead of trying to pick a winner. if you want a movie star go to hollywood. the choices you make today will shape many lives tommorrow. so please stop the nonsence and start asking real questions. hillary was clearly more knowledgeable. </p>
<p>as for wolf, the media has always been biased agianst Hill so his actions and the questions from politico(the guy is always on cnn) was all desingned to try to give obama an edge. he tried to start a problem but she rose above that .<br />
the media wants to pick our president like they picked the last one and look what it got us into</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy O</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-428975</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-428975</guid>
		<description>If Integrity, honesty, ethical behavior matters to you. The reject the scandals of the Clintons. Vote to prevent Hillary and her spouse from returning to WH.  America deserves better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Integrity, honesty, ethical behavior matters to you. The reject the scandals of the Clintons. Vote to prevent Hillary and her spouse from returning to WH.  America deserves better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marie7</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-428973</link>
		<dc:creator>Marie7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-428973</guid>
		<description>Clinton/Obama if ever, and not the other way around.  Obama can be president in 8 more years, and by then he will have the experience he really does need to do this incredibly import job.  

I am SO SICK OF THE MEDIA SLAMMING HILLARY AND BILL CLINTON.  YOU ARE ALL SO OBVIOUSLY AGAINST BOTH OF THEM.

The media has been unfair to Hillary and Bill Clinton ever since this race began.

Why don&#039;t you guys dig more into Obama&#039;s life and put him under the microscope the way the Clinton&#039;s have been?  

Everyone I know is sick of the unfair bias of the media against Hillary.

Wise up newscasters, and all media people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clinton/Obama if ever, and not the other way around.  Obama can be president in 8 more years, and by then he will have the experience he really does need to do this incredibly import job.  </p>
<p>I am SO SICK OF THE MEDIA SLAMMING HILLARY AND BILL CLINTON.  YOU ARE ALL SO OBVIOUSLY AGAINST BOTH OF THEM.</p>
<p>The media has been unfair to Hillary and Bill Clinton ever since this race began.</p>
<p>Why don't you guys dig more into Obama's life and put him under the microscope the way the Clinton's have been?  </p>
<p>Everyone I know is sick of the unfair bias of the media against Hillary.</p>
<p>Wise up newscasters, and all media people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jayhawk34</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-428969</link>
		<dc:creator>Jayhawk34</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-428969</guid>
		<description>Elizabeth---you blame Bush for the war, but fail to acknowledge the BALANCE OF POWERS???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elizabeth-you blame Bush for the war, but fail to acknowledge the BALANCE OF POWERS???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernard (Virginia)</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-428949</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernard (Virginia)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-428949</guid>
		<description>Their healthcare plans are virtually the same...how can you say Sen Clinton&#039;s plan is &quot;superior&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their healthcare plans are virtually the same...how can you say Sen Clinton's plan is "superior"?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-428941</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-428941</guid>
		<description>Why doesn&#039;t any one ever ask her why we should believe that her family won&#039;t disgrace our white house and our country the way it did before...and why should we put them back in it.  If we get Hillary...we get Bill...been there...done that...don&#039;t want it again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why doesn't any one ever ask her why we should believe that her family won't disgrace our white house and our country the way it did before...and why should we put them back in it.  If we get Hillary...we get Bill...been there...done that...don't want it again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BG from chicago</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-428939</link>
		<dc:creator>BG from chicago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-428939</guid>
		<description>wow a great debate.  but there were a lot of flaws in their health care plans i picked out that i wish cnn had asked about... darn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow a great debate.  but there were a lot of flaws in their health care plans i picked out that i wish cnn had asked about... darn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonali</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-428933</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-428933</guid>
		<description>Thank you Bill Bennet,

For saying the truth that she won the debate!

Also I  today the spin masters are bit more neutral and I am grateful for that.

Thank you CNN</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Bill Bennet,</p>
<p>For saying the truth that she won the debate!</p>
<p>Also I  today the spin masters are bit more neutral and I am grateful for that.</p>
<p>Thank you CNN</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connie L</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-428932</link>
		<dc:creator>Connie L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/31/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-democratic-debate/#comment-428932</guid>
		<description>If the Democrats want to win...pick Hillary.....She has definitely outsmarted Barack Obama....I think he can be in the Cabinet or maybe something else.....HILLARY WON TONIGHT!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Democrats want to win...pick Hillary.....She has definitely outsmarted Barack Obama....I think he can be in the Cabinet or maybe something else.....HILLARY WON TONIGHT!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
