February 1, 2008
Posted: February 1st, 2008 09:00 AM ET

The audience response was the same as that of Democrats across the country: they’re happy with their choice this year, but they don’t want to have to make it.

I thought overall, his position tonight was still that of the challenger, and she was effectively the incumbent. Barack Obama needed to peel votes away from Clinton. He made some progress on the Iraq issue. But how many Democrats are still more concerned about Iraq than about anything else?

To the extent that the debate was a draw, it helps Clinton.

Why? Because holding his own wasn’t enough. Obama’s task tonight was to make the case that there were huge differences between them. Just holding his own and looking presidential was not enough - he had to convince Democrats who like her that there’s a reason she shouldn’t be the party’s nominee.

He clearly had command on the issue of Iraq. Six months ago that would have been enough. Now? I’m not so sure. It took a while for the issue to take center stage tonight, and that’s no accident: Other concerns have come to the forefront.

In all, it was an unhelpful debate. They minimized their differences. Tonight’s showdown will rally Democrats, no question – but won’t help them make a decision. The biggest applause line of the evening came for the idea of the two of them together.

The debate doesn’t kill momentum for either one. But does it help build any? His strong showing could very well help Obama. But how much - enough to overtake Clinton? I just didn’t see that.

Related: Watch Bill Schneider discuss the debate with CNN.com's Melissa Long

Related: Watch CNN's analysts discuss the outcome of Thursday's debate

– CNN Senior Political Analyst Bill Schneider

Filed under: Bill Schneider


Emily, Atlanta, GA   February 1st, 2008 6:32 pm ET

Obama didn't win. He sounded just like Hillary except with more stutters and less substance. Obama supporters are only saying he won because they are impressed that he could actually talk about policies for a change. Hillary knew her stuff inside and out. Obama sounded like he just finished reading about his own policies.
Hillary is the president of the people. Obama is the president of elitists. Obama supporters keep talking about a movement and change. But change for what? Give me a straight answer. If it's for a better America then why should I vote for him when Hillary is the one who can best carry it out.

Gena   February 1st, 2008 5:48 pm ET

I am so proud to be a Democrat. Hillary and Obama both very spectacular, I do feel that Hillary has a better grasp of the responsibilities that are involved. There are no lesser of two evils here, just the greater of two very bright ,articulate and caring Americans. I will be proud to support whom ever is the nominee,

Lenita   February 1st, 2008 4:56 pm ET

What is the big picture. It is about who will win in November. They are both great candidates. The prospect of Hillary winning is November is not possible or probable. Even if there were a Clinton/Obama ticket in November, the Democrates will lose. Who is more ethical? Too many bad memories that will resurface. The Republicans will win and control the White House again. The future is now. Pray that Obama wins for the sake of this country's future.

Frank in California   February 1st, 2008 4:45 pm ET

It was a cordial debate. Both of these fine Senators are inspiring. Clinton continues to be my favorite. She is the best prepared and she is able to work with both Reps and Dems and can win a fight. It is a plus that she is a "Washington Insider." We need someone who can pull off deals and further the agenda that is important to us Democrats. Obama would make a great VP! Go Hillary!

CHERYL   February 1st, 2008 4:41 pm ET

HOW WOULD OBAMA KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT VOTES? HE WAS ABSENT FOR SO MANY!!!!!!!!!! GO HILLARY*****************************************************************

Joe   February 1st, 2008 3:44 pm ET

Both looked good, but Obama gets my vote after this debate.

Tim, Seattle   February 1st, 2008 3:43 pm ET

SA said "Hillary said she would have voted differently:

Yes, she voted for it before she voted against it. Where have I heard that before?

She could have deflected that question for good by getting off her arrogant trip and admitting it was a mistake. 4 simple words and the isuue dissapears. If you cant admit you made a mistake, then I cant trust you.

Obama/Seoulis 08

V from STL   February 1st, 2008 2:51 pm ET

OBAMA!!! OBAMA!!!

NOT GONNA LIE... THEY BOTH LOOKED GOOD IN THE DEBATE.

I think as Democrats, we have an awesome selection in front of us. Either one would be an awesome Cannidate.

I am personally a Obama supporter. To the the ASIAN IN CHICAGO comment, do you have any "Imperical Evidence" to support your claims. Don't spead rumors, just support your canndidate... There are a lot of Americans hidding out in the woodwork who are wanting change. Obama is that change! Having two families run the country for 20+ years isn't....

Obama's gonna take it by a very small margin... Cya!!

keith   February 1st, 2008 2:50 pm ET

John, "Americans dont care about Iraq. I think the economy and health care are bigger issues, and this is why clinton won." You must not know anyone in IRAQ!! or live in America. Sorry, but people do care about IRAQ!!! Now, about the economy and health care. Neither one of them have much experience in either area except proposing bills or legislation. To me, that is not enough experience to warrant being president. If either one were a state governor, then I would say they have experience in those areas. So, since neither has been a state governor, how did clinton win?

missouri   February 1st, 2008 2:50 pm ET

Also, all this talk about Obama's speeches of change and good judgement does not mean squat if you can't unite the parties to work together. His speeches are stating exactly what every American wants to hear, but then he has NOTHING to back up his words.

And all this talk of who "looks" more Presidential. What is that about? Are we seriously down to voting someone into a Presidency based on an outward appearance?

Optimist   February 1st, 2008 2:03 pm ET

It was a pretty lengthy debate....Obama did better in this debate than some of them. Hillary was pretty sharp...boy does she know how to end her points even if they are unclear...its amazing.

Barack says uhhh alot....Hillary says you know you know.....alot.

Barack won the Iraq debate....Hillary won Healthcare...

They split on many issues as a draw....immigration...economy.

Good debate...Hillary was funnier....Barack more believable....

While I won't say Barack won....Hillary may get the slight nod actually ..she killed it in the beginning but lost in the middle...Barack still got through his main points to many proving that Judgement trumps years in office. He continues to paint himself as the visionary in foreign policy at the same time stong on the homefront to much success.

This debate will helpOBAMA more than Hillary this Tuesday.

Sandra   February 1st, 2008 11:00 am ET

Hillary beat Obama up like a little kid in a school yard! She is brilliant!!! He is NOTHING!!!! He can't even talk right!

Gayle   February 1st, 2008 10:58 am ET

I am registered Independent voter in order to distance myself from partisan politics. However, I have always voted Democratic.

I agree with you, Bill, that perhaps Obama did not differentiate himself on substance. In fact there is not much difference on policy and issues to highlight.

But judgement and character of our President are vitally important issues for voters to consider and here there are distinct differences. Regarading the former, Obama effectivly uses his opposition to invading Iraq to highlight his good judgement. Regarding the latter, which is just as if not more important to me, Wolfe did try to explore character with these candidates. But this is a slippery slope for Obama and Clinton to debate. I would like to say what Obama can't say. Both Hillary's and Bill's conduct and tactics on the campaign has reminded us of their less than admirable character. While they will probably behave better going forward, it is only because it serves their purpose. If less than honerarble tactics would serve them well, they would use them .

We have a clear choice between Obama and Clinton. I hope people rcognize a man of outstanding character and put him in the White House

Matt - Florida   February 1st, 2008 10:52 am ET

It's amazing how much the Clinton machine sounds like the republicans. Blaming the media? Give me a break. Personal insults about Obama? Take your fear and hatred elsewhere.

It's time for change.

WMW   February 1st, 2008 10:52 am ET

Hillary won the debate just like she will win the nomination. Unless, unless the establishment on the Dems side decides otherwise!

Mak   February 1st, 2008 10:51 am ET

Hillary at least did something to prove she was right and wrong. What does Obama has? He was right by luck to vote no for war. If the false evidence that was presented before going to war was to clear that even a baby would have said yes to the war. On this background who will be right and ready and capable of judging on the day One?

Anonymous   February 1st, 2008 10:51 am ET

I think HRC did well in the debate, her answers were typical....you can really tell she is calculated and a Washington insider. I couldn't stopped laughing when she said that each one of them had to start out and compete on their own records and merits. Lets be honest, if her last name was not CLINTON, she wouldn't be as popular as she is now. Most of the people who vote for her remember the administration of her husband and want those times to come back... Bill Clinton is not running!!! I want someone to get there from their own merits... Look at the Bush we have now and he is only president because of his last name and his daddy.

31 year old voter   February 1st, 2008 10:50 am ET

Saying that it takes a Clinton to clean up after a Bush probably pissed off millions of Americans. Thanks Hillary, you're such a unifier. Who needs another arrogant president?

Gary   February 1st, 2008 10:47 am ET

This debate helped accomplish the most important issue for the election in November, the re-unification of the Democratic Party and its membership. The Democrats were close to self-destruction with their bickering and attacks upon one another. Hopefully the candidates now realize that the true adversary in this campaign is the Republican nominee.

Reading the comments on the Republican debate articles, it looks like many registered Democrats are trying to identify which Republican candidate they can tolerate, because they have already decided not to vote for Clinton or Obama. Therefore, it appears vital to stem the flow of Democrats away from the party.

Anonymous   February 1st, 2008 10:46 am ET

As an independent, I think it is interesting that two conservative pundits (Bill Bennett and Pat Buchanan) praised Hillary and said she won the debate. Obviously Republicans would rather face Hillary next November. Barrack made his case and offered a clear difference with regard to Iraq. If Democrats want to win the general election next fall they should nominate Barrack Obama.

SA   February 1st, 2008 10:44 am ET

Obama keeps using Hillary's vote way back just like 911 was overused by Guil...
Back then MOST of us were backing Bush as we believed him esp just ater 911.
Hillary said she would have voted differently.
HE IS A BROKEN RECORD and this should not be our determining factor when voting Tues.
This man is amazing and a dreamer she is a realist and brilliant, skilled and with more experience both here and abroad..and with a better longer track record. This is IMPORTANT!
I just wish the Media would be fair and stop only praising Obama and mostly bashing Hillary and Bill.

Joe   February 1st, 2008 9:40 am ET

I disagree. To the extent that Senator Obama "holds his own", it is a huge positive for him. First, to say that Senator Obama is just as prepared to be President as Senator Clinton takes the experience factor out of the race. Then it comes down to 1) who do you like and 2) who's going to bring about change.

Fair or not (and personally, I think it is somewhat unfair), people don't necessarily like Senator Clinton - so there is not much more to say there.

So then let's talk about change. You heard it last night in one of the on-line questions. Since 1988, we've been choosing between Bushes and Clintons for President. Honestly, we have a lot of talent in this country and we don't need to be creating dynasties. You can say that is unfair to Senator Clinton, but the truth is that in South Carolina, both Senator Clinton and the former President certainly sounded as if they thought the nomination/presidency was something that was "owed" to them. Sorry, I respect Senator Clinton a lot but I don't buy the argue that "it is her turn."

Finally, the huge majority of Democrats know one thing for sure. We don't want to see a Republican elected in 2008. A lot of Democrats are truly asking themselves is Senator Clinton can beat Senator McCain and they are getting nervous. That trepidation is not there with Senator Obama. In the South Carolina primary, Senator Obama got more votes than Senator McCain and Governor Huckabee COMBINED. That's amazing when you consider that South Carolina is a huge GOP stronghold.

So, if Senator Obama is "just as ready to be President" as Senator Clinton - he wins because Democrats are sensing that he will win in November.

Jen B.   February 1st, 2008 5:51 am ET

The country needs another Clinton to clean up after another Bush? No thanks, enough of these dynasties.
Time to change cleaners.

Obama/Biden

Bruno   February 1st, 2008 5:49 am ET

Wolf Blitzer's very last question is the one that hurt Obama the most as many Democrat primary voters will start to see him again, as it was the case before Iowa, as Hillary Clinton's prospective VP.

Ready   February 1st, 2008 5:45 am ET

I must say that I am ready to vote for OBAMA! Clinton wandered off so much that i had to mute her several times.,,,snoring along the way. She wouldn't answer the questions, but instead her ego was the main topic. She was pathetic! Barack may stutter here and there but he was straightforward and that's what we need in the White House.

This is the first time in my lifetime that i thought i would never see an African-American in the top two for President of the United States. It is very good to see a lot of the young people involved in this race because this is your future, and your hopes and dreams.

No matter who wins it will take many years to clean up the mess we are in now.

Go Obama 08'. It is time for change and the time is NOW!!!!!

Alan from Atlanta   February 1st, 2008 5:35 am ET

How gratifying to listen to Clinton and Obama have an intelligent, substantive discussion about the issues. Compared to the one dimensional, cliche-ridden Republican debate the night before, the Democratic debate was a brilliant evening.

Whether it's Clinton or Obama who gets the nomination – inevitably – and the momentum is with the Demos – it will be a real win-win for America.

cnn debate fan   February 1st, 2008 5:32 am ET

Hillary put on another brilliant performance last night although I kept waiting for the tears

I'm voting Obama 08 despite what the pundits say!!

barry comer   February 1st, 2008 5:32 am ET

Last night's debate was measured and thoughtful. It provided a seating arrangement designed for intimacy and less ground to exercise and strike a dramatic pose.

If it accomplished one thing, it demonstrated a coherent platform that neither candidate could use for much gesture, posing or foot play.

Either Obama or Clinton have fully realized an articulate counter to the opposition party's lack of bringing vision and hope back into our government.

Anonymous   February 1st, 2008 5:31 am ET

I am tired of the Iraq vote. At the time, Hillary made the correct vote. Why doesn't Wolf ask tough questions of Obama? Why doesn't Donna complain about how Hillary is treated she screamed about secret code words that were offensive to Obama. Hey what about women????????

Hillary won tonight and Wolf should be ashamed of himself

Dem   February 1st, 2008 5:31 am ET

Wolf is trouble maker.

Hillary wins debates

Obama leads with vision and clarity

Obama 08

CNN Debate Fan   February 1st, 2008 5:29 am ET

Hillary put on another great act last night although I was waiting for the tears...

Obama you've got my vote despite what the pundits say!

Ryan   February 1st, 2008 5:04 am ET

Canada wants Clinton!!!!!

Mahinda Katugaha   February 1st, 2008 4:48 am ET

Bill, You are the most reasonable commentator out of the Republican supporting CNN. Despite, the support to non-winnable Obama in first place (for sure CNN will burst the now blown up Obama off should he get the nomination in the main contest – with all racial slurry!!). I doubt if America is ready to put a Black man in the WHITE HOUSE. They may be ready to put in a woman (who also received franchise after men in US). Lets see. Best would be Hillary-Obama ticket first and test the latter who has not received any clearance so far to come to the top post.

Tano   February 1st, 2008 4:47 am ET

I disagree that a draw favors Clinton. I disagree that he needed to draw sharp contrasts.,

Personally, I think Obama had the edge, but even if you call it a draw, Obama was a very big winner tonite.

He managed to defuse the central concern about his campaign. Everyone accepts that he has great rhetorical skills, and bring millions of new voters into the party, including independents. He can grow the party.

The concern has been that he doesnt match up to Hillary's mastery of policy – that he may be too much style and too little substance. That concern is gone now. He went head to head with the ultimate policy wonk and held his own perfectly well. He even pulled it off looking very dignified and presidential.

So if he comes off as her equal on policy, and clearly her better on outreach, then he becomes the obvious choice.

John Smith   February 1st, 2008 3:55 am ET

I really think it is going to take the Clintons for the DEMS to lose the White House again; Remember Gore and Kerry? How short minded can the Dems really be in this nation. These were the "accidents" of the Clintons!!!!!

The Dems are laughing NOW because the Independents, moderate Republicans and young voters have been brought onboard by Obama. Let us wait until they put up Hillary as the nominee and the hole will run dry!!!!

This is yours to lose again Dem; it always takes the Clintons for the Dems to lose!!!

Mr. Rathmutin   February 1st, 2008 3:55 am ET

No question about it.....Obama will be the next President.
Hilary is so power hungry and phony. Go back to N.Y. and feed the you're line.

Sterling   February 1st, 2008 12:07 am ET

Canada wants Obama!!!!!

Jay   February 1st, 2008 12:07 am ET

Hillary won this debate on Health care issue, Immigration , Economy.Obama won on Iraq war. Overall it was Hillary's night.

alan   February 1st, 2008 12:06 am ET

I would disagree with the debate was a wash. Clearly we see Obama with the momentum going into super tuesday. I really dont feel this is a wash the iraq part of the debate is going to rehash Clintons position this next week in the cycle. I really think that the "right" experience is going to blunt the "35 years of experience."

IMO Im trying to take the debate including other variables comming into this debate. I think this helped Obama considering we see trends favoring him.

Plus President Clinton is hitting the news today about a dealing with a shady character in kazakhstan, or some character from that region. Its not a wash Obama becomes the angel above the fray again and clinton might get pulled down again with this new revelation.

Oh ya Obama just raised 32 million dollars

PJ   February 1st, 2008 12:04 am ET

Obama is amazing.

Victoria   February 1st, 2008 12:04 am ET

Hillary rocked with that line it took a Clinton to clean up after a Bush, so it will take another to clean up after the second Bush. Will be voting for her on Tuesday in NJ. Not really an Obama fan, but will vote for him against any Republican. MC Cain is a war nut and knows nothing about the economy...

TH   February 1st, 2008 12:01 am ET

Who cares which won of those liberals I mean Socialist won.

Joe   February 1st, 2008 12:00 am ET

They are both extremely good people and good candidates. I would be proud to have either of them as President.

I never wanted a coronation, nor did I want a rock star. Rough as it has been at some points, I think having this campaign serves either of them – and the Democrats – well for the general election.

Daniel Scott Buck   February 1st, 2008 12:00 am ET

If we are to believe that Hillary was sincere when she cast that vote in support of the war, then we have to ask how much her White House experience is really worth. After all, she gave that authority to Bush, someone she should have known in and out.

Obama knew not to trust President Bush. Why didn't Hillary?

Soldiers for Obama   January 31st, 2008 11:59 pm ET

America IS ready for a woman president, just not Hillary.

Go Obama

anthony   January 31st, 2008 11:44 pm ET

BEFORE THIS DEBATE I WAS AN UNDECIDED. HOWEVER, AFTER WATCHING TONIGHTS DEBATE, IVE DECIDED I WILL VOTE FOR OBAMA. TO BE COMPETING WITH NAME RECOGNITION LIKE HILLARY, IMHO HE DID A GREAT JOB. HES BEEN VERY CONSISTENT WITH ISSUES AND LOOKED AND SOUNDED VERY PRESIDENTIAL. OBAMA FOR 08

Mark from San Diego   January 31st, 2008 11:43 pm ET

My favorite comment re Hillary comes from CNN's Carl Bernstein, "Hillary has a difficult relationship with the truth." If you can't tell the truth you have no integrity and if you have no intergity you are not qualified to be President.

If Obama gets the nomination the Dems win in November. If Hillary gets the nod the Dems better gear up for President McCain.

Joy   January 31st, 2008 11:37 pm ET

The media has been pushing Obama since the beginning of this race and have done everything possible to destroy Hillary and her campaign. I hope the American people see this. The worst culprit is MSNBC and Chris Matthews. We need fewer analysts and more straight news. I hope the American people are smart enough to make the decisions on their own. Hillary did great tonight. Let's give her credit where it is due.

Paul in Kissimmee   January 31st, 2008 11:36 pm ET

I thought Hillary won the debate on issues. She wouldn't give a timeline on the pullout from Iraq, and that was the right answer. You cannot put a timeline on something until you put your plan in progress. I did however like hearing Obama say that he wants his people to tell him if he is wrong. Just like he said, nobody is perfect. Unless Jesus himself is commenting on this, Obama should not be criticized for that remark by anybody.

Henry Vu   January 31st, 2008 11:36 pm ET

Hilary was a bit better. Obama did well but his problem is no or weak substance.

Terrance   January 31st, 2008 11:34 pm ET

I think Clinton did well but we really need to look at the ultimate goal and that is winning the White House. I don't feel Clinton by herself can win the White House. Too many people Hate her so much that they will vote against her just to spite her. This one really bothers me because I see us having two of the best chances to win the WH but it's a stronger together strategy I think must be followed rather than one over the other. We could still lose if we are not smart strategist. I just don't see the two of them working together, their Ego's are too big right now. Think about an Obama/Clinton ticket...many would say no, how about a Clinton/Obama ticket? would that work? I for one would like to see both, can't they work together. I am so tired of the Bush Administration. We can't let this one slip away like 2000 and 2004.

S. Hunt, Tennessee   January 31st, 2008 11:34 pm ET

We need to come together right now, vote for who we want to and support whichever one wins. We need to stop bickering and be grateful that we have two great candidates. We need to realize that it will take each and everyone of us to beat the Republican candidate. We must succeed. If we don't, war for another 100 years......unimaginable. Quit slamming either candidate. Their message to us tonight is we must unite.

jenica   January 31st, 2008 11:34 pm ET

I believe Barak remained consistent, honest and very authentic- this is not just about the short term, he has long term outlook, this is his person. I just don't take hilary for face value she seems to be telling us just what we want to hear. He has continued his very transparent approach to sincerly involve us all in our future and I beleive tha that is worth more than the same old lip service.

Sam   January 31st, 2008 11:34 pm ET

Both candidates have good policy statements. Mr. Obama presented his proposed solutions to overcome the economic problem we are facing and a workable health care solution that will be supported by all Americans. In the final analysis this debate has shown Mr. Obama is able to listen and work with people who strongly disagree with him. This is one of the qualities we long for in our next president.

Christa   January 31st, 2008 11:34 pm ET

Everyone complains that Obama doesn't talk specifics. When he finally does, people don't grasp his intelligence or his refreshing ideas.

Marie Barlow   January 31st, 2008 11:34 pm ET

Both candidates did well. Could have done without the audience and the nasty dig from Wolf Blitzer about Clinton being naive (I'm usually a Wolf fan). Clinton is clearly the more experienced, well-rounded candidate, even with her error in judgement about the Iraq war. What if Bush had been right? You never hear that angle. Obama is a newbie, not experienced enough to take charge. The GOP would eat him for breakfast. Say what you will, but the Clintons know how to play and win the hardball game with the GOP. Hillary Clinton has the guts and tenacity to take on the GOP; she's been tested and keeps on coming. I could definately live with a Clinton/Obama ticket.

dean   January 31st, 2008 11:34 pm ET

they handed the presidency to mitt

Andre   January 31st, 2008 11:33 pm ET

I beg to differ! Clinton won this one!! And Bill, aren't you the flip flopper! All of your biased pro-Obama articles and you come to the conclusion it was a draw?? No wonder you're an Obama supporter because he flips flips so often!!

Scott   January 31st, 2008 11:33 pm ET

Hillary still never answered the question of what happens to the mandated people if they can't afford insurance – she completely ducked that one.

Also, she said if you have insurance you are happy with, it doesn't change. What she didn't say was that the cost for me won't go up when all of the new people enter the system.

gene   January 31st, 2008 11:33 pm ET

Anyone who watched this debate and believes Obama won, I have a toll bridge that I would like to sell you cheap. The 12 voters at the start of the debate was divided 6 for Obama and 6 for clinton. After the debate the count was 7 Clinton and 5 Obama. That is a really large spread . If you project that out thru the population, it would represent a landslide win.

Bob   January 31st, 2008 11:33 pm ET

This was a level-headed debate. Obama did not get the knockout he needed to push him before next week Super Tuesday. As a democrat, I feed delighted because it does not matter who wins, they would be ready to take on McCain. The sooner this get decided, the better. Go Hillbama.

Max C   January 31st, 2008 11:31 pm ET

Well, a lot of us who aren't running could also "be right on day one." After all, those of us who weren't in the senate, at the time, like, Obama, for example, didn't want to go to war but also believed the threat of WMD. Hillary won this debate and anyone who thinks Obama was clear, must have been watching a different debate. He stuttered, uhm'd often and waved a magic wand that only hides his political ambition. At least Hillary who has ambition also has her eyse OPEN about our political, economic and social realities. Hillary in 2008!!

Kris   January 31st, 2008 11:31 pm ET

Hillary took this debate. I felt it took Obama 90 minutes to hit his stride because before that he wasn't very concise and often stuttered through his thoughts and answers.

But the the real winners tonight were Democrats everywhere.

another real Asian-American   January 31st, 2008 11:30 pm ET

"Is it not ironic the President Barack Obama (a uniter) and the "4/4″th President of The United States of America is of African descent; while the ultimate uniter, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. left us on "4/4″1968 (April 4, 1968) almost exactly 40-years ago…"

Dear real Asian-American,

I respectfully disagree. MLK was the real package. BHO is a "marketed" package. He comes across as too slick and artificial, his great oratory skills notwithstanding.

Dave   January 31st, 2008 11:29 pm ET

How soon do you think they will go back to throwing grenades at each other?
9:00 AM? 10?

Ken   January 31st, 2008 11:29 pm ET

Change????? will he re-name the white house to the black house?

Jim in CT   January 31st, 2008 11:29 pm ET

Bill, you are pathetic! You're all upset that the candidates are civil to one another and actually discussed the issues! Get over it!!! The rest of us actually learned something.

Leah DiMarco, TX   January 31st, 2008 11:29 pm ET

Both Clintons are CROOKS and DISHONEST.
Senator Obama will not pick Senator Clinton for 'anything'!

Obama / someone with integrity '08

nazirmo   January 31st, 2008 11:29 pm ET

McCain reiterates vow to capture Osama bin Laden
Give me a break – Bush will end 8 years and Osama may be or may not be
captured. 8 years was a long time. Now McCain wants the Presidency to capture Osama. I think people are worried about recession and loss of jobs and the economy.

AJ   January 31st, 2008 11:28 pm ET

I have never been more proud to be a democrat. This is an amazing moment in history that we all get to be a part of and we should rejoice. Regardless of who you stand for it is obvious we all stand together. Let us all remember, the people we have to beat are not each other but the Republicans in November.

Denny Sangiovanni   January 31st, 2008 11:28 pm ET

As Bill Clinton said ¨"Fairy Tale". Both are "Fairy Tale". He knows cause he´s being there. I think from Richard Nixon on, every president has being selling in their campaigns that they are going to fix Health Care, Social Security , etc, etc, etc.

Mark   January 31st, 2008 11:28 pm ET

I am a lifelong Democrat and have been following this contest closely. But, I am a lawyer, also. There doesn't seem to be much argument that Hillary overbilled, in a reprehensible fashion, some of her clients while she was at the Rose Law Firm. I don't care what she says or does now, that is truly despicable conduct and is, quite frankly, a true character flaw. We don't need another Machiavellian in the White House. I have found nothing similar in terms of Obama. See it for what it is. If experience means the status quo, I want no part of it. Obama needs to win this to rescue the soul of our country.

WGS   January 31st, 2008 11:28 pm ET

If, as you've said, this didn't kill momentum for either, then I would have to say the Obama is looking awfully good. After all he came into this debate rolling a wave of support that has translated into rapidly expanding poll numbers and an enormous month of fund-raising. I suspect Edwards and Gore watched this debate with considerable interest and one or both will endorse him before Feb 5th.

Nell Kidd   January 31st, 2008 11:28 pm ET

Wonderful debate tonight !!!! What a wonderful ticket the 2 of them would make. To those who think B.O. and H.C. should have had a cat fight instead of a debate--turn your t.v. to a pro wrestling match. Most of us wanted an honest debate tonight and I think we got it.

JE   January 31st, 2008 11:27 pm ET

Obama & Edwards = unity .

jen-in-ca   January 31st, 2008 11:27 pm ET

CLINTON/BIDEN 08

RG   January 31st, 2008 11:27 pm ET

At the very end of the debate, Hillary was guilty of a telling misspeak.

She said, to paraphrase, "we (Barak and she) have had the great opportunity of traveling the country and have been so pleased with the response (from people) that we have "engendered."

I believe she meant, "encountered." Engendered means to "cause" or "bring about."

Increasingly, our politics is seemingly based on a subtle or not so subtle attempt to cause or even manipulate people to respond in ways that benefit those who are seeking power, and not what may be in the best interests of the people they say they are representing.

Sorry to say this, but the Clintons seem well versed in the "politics of engenderment."

Mary   January 31st, 2008 11:27 pm ET

Why are there so many Hillary trolls on these message boards spamming rahrah messages?

Just more shameless tactics from the "do anything say anything to win" camp.

Seriously, grow up.

Marwan -- Canadian   January 31st, 2008 11:27 pm ET

Obama won, and is winning. On the other hand, I am shocked that some Democrats wanna tack chances on a Bill Clinton in the white house. Can't you see that the party will suffer tremendously in a matter of a year (that is if she actually beats mcCain).

Do democrats really wanna give up congress, in 2010? and the white house in 2012? How short sighted can you guys be. Doesn't the world deserve a fresh clean start?

Carl   January 31st, 2008 11:26 pm ET

Couldn't agree more with Michelle, A.L. Gloria Borger's politics are so transparent with regard to Hillary it's amusing. Tonight's debate was conducted by both candidates in a civil and professional manner. Both were winners along with the Democratic Party and the American people.

Bill   January 31st, 2008 11:26 pm ET

Obama is a onr trick pony, I didn't vote for the war, if he wants to do something why dosen't he figure what to do with all the drug dealers gang members and murders invadeing small towns and cities in the North East states. These scum are coming out of the big cities and just takeing over small towns, and yes most are black. If Obama is nominated look for one hell of a backlash vote

Manuela   January 31st, 2008 11:26 pm ET

you go Hillary! please vite for her!

mario   January 31st, 2008 11:26 pm ET

Hillary did great..... go Hillary!!!!

Steve   January 31st, 2008 11:26 pm ET

Gee, what did we learn? Our taxes are going to go through the roof and we are going to pull out of Iraq no matter the cost. As for the planned "joke" of Hillary, well... I believe that we were in a recession when Bush took over in 2000 and he cleaned that one up. And he did it without reprehensible behavior towards young girls or lying to a grand jury. Ohh and I almost forgot one other nugget that came out of tonight's debate.... Immigrants don't come here to drive but to work. Yes siree we've got a couple of real intellectuals here!

Tracie   January 31st, 2008 11:26 pm ET

Hillary Clinton 08

Sean   January 31st, 2008 11:26 pm ET

it was nice for them to be cordial... either way, they give the party the best chance to win in the general election if they are on the same ticket.

Go Obama/Clinton or Clinton/Obama!

Abby   January 31st, 2008 11:25 pm ET

I love America because only in the united State of A can a Woman and a black man be running for the office of the presidency.

I love both candidates, i know my Obama does not have the experience but then what has the experienced people in this country done for us .

Perhaps too much experience is the cause of our failure as a nation .

When a nation exalts itself above God , it falls . When a president/ commander in chief feels he is god over the world , this is what happens.

We should preach the message of love and unity which Obama can deliver .

Go Democrats , whoever is elected , i am fine with the last 2 standing

Boomer   January 31st, 2008 11:25 pm ET

The Republicans will say that Obama is weak on foreign policy and the terrorists because he failed to support the war in Iraq.

Hugh Miller   January 31st, 2008 11:25 pm ET

At the very end Hillary Clinton was talking about some website to visit on Monday. Was she shilling for Hallmark? What was that about?

-Hugh Miller

Michelle   January 31st, 2008 11:25 pm ET

Hillary had to play nice with all the bad press she has been getting. She did the same thing in New Hampshire, the pressure is on her not OBAMA! Obama has stayed on message and never waivered. He is the only truly GENUINE, TRUSTWORTHY PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE!

OBAMA, OBAMA, OBAMA!

Denny Sangiovanni   January 31st, 2008 11:25 pm ET

If they play dirty bad, if they don't bad too. Hum....

Franco   January 31st, 2008 11:25 pm ET

Bill, thank you for the analysis from a REPUBLICAN point of view ,which you are, since you also work for a Republican think tank.
But you are wrong, we Democrats saw a big difference.

jen-in-ca   January 31st, 2008 11:25 pm ET

Brother. If her record doesn't say enough then you Barack supporters need to get your head checked. All you have to hang onto is a speech about Iraq where he didn't have to vote. Even Barack said himself, she has a great record and her service to this Country. Who cares that Bill Clinton was having indiscressions. It's no one business what he did. Sure funny it wasn't a problem when JFK was with Marilyn Monroe when he was president. So get off it.

Hillary by far has the experience, knowledge, and recognizable face around the world to bring the US back to the great country we can be. Barack is not qualified period. No matter what , hope and inspiration doesn't equate solutions to the huge problems this country faces.

It's going to take a Clinton to clean up the mess left behind.

Chad   January 31st, 2008 11:25 pm ET

Tonight, Clinton said she did everything she could before she voted for the authorization of force in Iraq. She said she read all the intelligence and talked to all the people.
THIS IS A BLATANT LIE
She did not read the National Intelligence Estimate Report that was THE official intelligence on claims to go to war. This document said there was no substantive proof and explained why. She did not read it. Her vote was entirely for political reasons. She sacrificed 3,000+ American lives and tens of thousands of Iraqi's for her own political gain. SHE DID NOT READ THE REPORT. What responsible person, let alone president would make that decision????
Wake up!

James M.   January 31st, 2008 11:25 pm ET

I think this is a time to hand the torch to the next generation of Democratic leaders. The Clintons had there chance to fix the big problems and didn't. They tried but they also failed.

Now it's the next generations turn. The Democrats should pick someone who will not only govern but grow the party and bring in the youth, because THEY will have to live in the world we create.

Brian   January 31st, 2008 11:25 pm ET

Hillary Clinton is going to get beaten for sure!! half democrats don't want her, ALL republicans don't want her, half independents don't want her. SMALL margin of those that like her. Barack Obama would have more broad support as the nominee. Obama actually made more sense on policy than Clinton.

BARACK OBAMA '08!!!

Roger   January 31st, 2008 11:24 pm ET

I encourage undecided and decided voters no matter what your choice to attend one of Obama's events and you will truly understand what this man stands for. Sen. Barrack is a tremendous person that cares deeply about the American people. That is why I support SENATOR OBAMA ALL THE WAY BECAUSE HE WONT ONLY BE READY ON DAY ONE BUT HE WILL BE "RIGHT" ON DAY ONE!!!

Dan   January 31st, 2008 11:24 pm ET

O-ba-ma, O-ba-ma, O-ba-ma, O-ba-ma, O-ba-ma, is going to win!!

Even..my son is singing his tune!

alfredo jimenez   January 31st, 2008 11:23 pm ET

HILLARY WON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!HANDS DOWN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! She was able to make obama contradict himself on the issue of mandated health care!!! he said what was hillary going to do if it were mandated but yet he himself mandates health care for kids what is he going to do to the kids if they don't have health care?

Beverly M.   January 31st, 2008 11:23 pm ET

First, let me say that I think the way CNN handled the Republican Debate last night and the Democratic Debate tonight was totally different. CNN really played up the two Democratic Candidates and it showed great partisanship, which I do not the media should show Americans. And the stage was set with the Hollywood stars.

I didn't like either candidate tonight. I thought that after all their fighting in the past weeks that they were not sincere tonight. They played the "love nest" game way too much. I can't trust a candidate who does that.

I also think that Senator Clinton was very unpresidential. Her husband, President Bill Clinton, is one of our former presidents. For Mrs. Clinton to put down our current President George W. Bush undermines our country. Her husband brought moral shame to our Country. But I did not turn away from his as our President.

At this point, my vote goes for Mitt Romney or John McCain. I believe they are men of character. I have not seen that with the two Democratic candidates.

Please Americans, think very carefully about who you want for your President. Everyone says the Economy is the biggest issue. Well if we do not have a secure America, the economy won't mean a thing.

I have not heard a stragey that is acceptable from either Hilliary or Obama. Sorry guys, you lost my vote.

Whitney   January 31st, 2008 11:23 pm ET

Sorry there wasn't any squabbling that you pundits so love to analyze. This debate WAS really helpful. Though I am a Barack Obama supporter, I realized after watching this debate that I can be happy with Hilary Clinton as our nominee.

Seeing the crowd react to the idea of a Obama/Clinton or Clinton/Obama primary really made me happy. Clinton's opening remark that no matter who wins, the Democratic party will be making history with their nominee. Senator Obama is the right person for the job of POTUS, but now I can accept whichever wins.

john   January 31st, 2008 11:23 pm ET

I actually don't think Hillary won tonight. I think she was playing it safe and taking her time with the spotlight to slowly talk about the things she's accomplished, which is indeed a lot. However, Barack is still a very inspiring man. Inspiring men do no need to have everything figured out on day one. He understands his elasticity of knowledge will always be there, but with very strong core values of potential, truth, and knowledge.

Barack may be behind, but the restraint for the common good he showed tonight indeed showed me what swallowing a big pill must be like. I would love to see and Obama/Clinton campaign in 08'.

Obama for President!

DAVE   January 31st, 2008 11:23 pm ET

LETS NOT MISTAKE THE ABILITY TO DEBATE WITH THE ABILITY TO MAKE JUDGEMENT. CLINTON WAS WRONG ABOUT IRAQ AND WOULDNT ADMIT IT. HER EXPERIENCE IN THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION HAS CLOUDED HER JUDGEMENT BEFORE AND IT WILL HAPPEN AGAIN.

VOTE BARACK

rdepontb, bel air md   January 31st, 2008 11:22 pm ET

Bill, get some sleep. Your eyes are deceiving you! Both Barack and Hillary looked waaaay better than either John or Mitt, and by a wide margin. I think Hillary won tonight's discussion, hands down, and I also think she's got what it takes to beat the pants off of the Republican ticket, whatever that degrades to being.

Go Hillary, and please leave that opening for Barack to join in-he is good. But you get my vote.

Mary   January 31st, 2008 11:22 pm ET

Have never missed a vote since voting for Harry Truman in 1948 and the best choice to rid this country of the worst presidency in our our history will be a Hillary Clinton ticket.

MominTN   January 31st, 2008 11:22 pm ET

I was disappointed in the candidates for not listening to Americans on the illegal immigration issue.

njboss   January 31st, 2008 11:22 pm ET

Unhelpful?!?
Hillary won?!?
What the hell conversation were some of you watching?!?
Hillary sounds like a policy wonk secretary...real inspiring...

Natalie   January 31st, 2008 11:22 pm ET

If Obama wants to be taken seriously he needs to stop stuttering before he begins every sentence. It's borderline ridiculous! Is he running for president of the United States or the high school geek club? He has great points but when compared to Hillary who always looked relaxed, poised and overwhelmingly confident he PALED in comparison…

However how much time is allotted to these responses? Hillary literally took an average of 3-4 minutes on every single response while Obama just sat there until he meekly interjected or until he was asked a response.

Was Hillary debating or preaching? Jeez!

Overall, the debate was boring. The obvious, strategic attempt at amicable debate was unbelievably fake and THAT was dissapointing.

axt113   January 31st, 2008 11:22 pm ET

Obama won, Hillary showed she's a flip flopper and conniving, she's changed her position on liscenses and on the war just to further her political career, Obama has picked the right choice and stuck with it even when it wasn't politically safe, he was right that Iraq was wrong, and he's right about the liscense program.

Obama 2008!

Kyle   January 31st, 2008 11:20 pm ET

Hillary cannot give a straight answer to anything period. She rambles on so long that people forget she is just BS-ing her way out of another tough question. Typical politicial tactics… Hillary supporters need to wake up and LISTEN.. if they listened they would support a real Presidential figure… Barack Obama! Right since DAY ONE!!!!!

Ben   January 31st, 2008 11:20 pm ET

Clinton did not clearly win this debate as some indicate above. If anything, this uneventful debate was a draw. I agree with this article, however, that a draw slightly favors Clinton given her popularity. If it weren't for her popularity and Obama was white, he would be the next democratic nominee. Personally, I would have preferred to hear more discussion on the economy. Though healthcare and Iraq are important issues, it's the economy that I think most are worried about.

T Rasmussen   January 31st, 2008 11:20 pm ET

OK, I give up. Since you won't prnt a critical Clinton/Obama comment, try this one.

I'm sooooooo thrilled by them both!!!!!

Dan   January 31st, 2008 11:20 pm ET

It looked like a win for both of them as well as the Democratic Party. It looks to me like they'll join forces and run together. If so they'll win the election...

Jack   January 31st, 2008 11:14 pm ET

Once again Clinton shined in the last debate! was extremely Presidential! and easily stated facts, solutions and direction. Once again Obama fumbles and stumbles though trying to make points or somewhat answer the question, but not really. He doenst appear to be able to keep his train of thought, never seemed to be on the topic at hand. When they are next to one another She stands out, hands down. I think its O-bombs for obama...Sorry Teddy!

Natalie   January 31st, 2008 11:13 pm ET

It was great to see immigration as one of the MAJOR issues that both candidates took seriously. This country seriously needs an immigration reformation plan that includes the NON demonization of illegal immigrants.

Obama's plans with THIS issue was the better of the two.

Samme   January 31st, 2008 11:13 pm ET

Hillary won hands down! She has experience, he does not. He says CHANGE, he may be right, but do we know what kind of change? We know what Clinton did for our country before, and we need change all right, CHANGE BACK TO THE GOOD CLINTON YEARS! He might make a good president next term. He should be her Vice and learn from her for 4 or 8 years, then he would be seasoned and ready.

HILLARY 08

Tia   January 31st, 2008 11:13 pm ET

I think both did well in this debate, but on points Hillary was the CLEAR winner. That hardly matters though as Obama illicits an emotional response from people that overrides their rational side. The only section Hillary lost on was Iraq. Health care, immagration, taxes ... all went to Hillary. If one took away the emotional rhetoric and just looked at policy point by point Hillary has a better grasp on EVERY issue and can discuss any issue in depth, has an opinion on every issue, and has a plan of attack on every issue. I think Obama likely has opinons on everything but I doubt he has plans of attack in such detail on every issue like Hilalry does. Perhaps the same reason she has these plans and can disccus any issue in detail is the very same thing that Obama supporters dislike Hillary for ... her years in politics.

TMWHeaton   January 31st, 2008 11:13 pm ET

By the way- you Hillary Trolls- Obama will never- EVER have Hillary on his ticket. They are fundamentally and philisophically different. Obama lifts people up, and Hilalry puts people down. I hope you know that a vote for Hillary is a vote for McCain.

Jwolffe in VA   January 31st, 2008 11:13 pm ET

What really bugs me is that CNN (and now on the local news) seems so disappointed that Hillary and Barack didn't have a brawl. I found the debate great because there was time for answers that were long enough to be meaningful and even a little nuanced. I live in Virginia and vote on the Tuesday after Super Tuesday. I still don't know who to vote for. Both are great when compared to anything on the GOP side.

Jody   January 31st, 2008 11:12 pm ET

Thank you CNN for having a much more intellegent, positive debate forum! Tonights debate reminded me, that if we look beyond "party politics" and "negativity and name calling", I would hope that Americans are asking themselves, "Which face, which voice, which personality do I want to be the President?" I constantly ask these questions and look to the debates, newspaper articles and (sometimes) political ads for the answers. "Who" do we want for a President? It's a simple, and direct question-and Americans seem to come up with many different responses.
We've seen the Clintons before. We've seen what the Bushes can do.
I haven't seen the Obamas.
I wasn't overly impressed with the Clinton Admin., or either Bush administrations.

I want a President who is a 'good statesman and a good spokesman' of our nation. And I want someone different.

OBAMA continues to impress me-and offers me the answers to my questions as to "who" I want as my President.
Congrats Senator Obama!

Florida4Hillary   January 31st, 2008 11:12 pm ET

I'm not entirely impressed with the "I've been right on the war all along." Obama has the luxury of not having been in the position TO vote on the war!

Interviewing Barack Obama on Meet the Press, Tim Russert read a quote he attributed to Obama to suggest that he has "not been a leader against the [Iraq] war": "In July of 2004, Barack Obama: 'I'm not privy to Senate intelligence reports. ... What would I have done? I don't know,' in terms of how you would have voted on the war."

"What I know is that from my vantage point the case was not made" for authorizing the war."

EXACTLY. He wasn't privvy to the intelligence, he didn't have meetings with intelligence agents. He was debriefed by anyone. He was – and is – an outsider. He ADMITS that he just doesn't know what he would have done. I'm surprised nobody has brought this up!

BM   January 31st, 2008 11:12 pm ET

After watching the debate tonight I don't believe Hillary, unfortunately, will be able to unify the Dems and Repubs.
She'll probably have to fight tooth & nail with the Republicans in Congress and not be effective as President.

godley711   January 31st, 2008 11:12 pm ET

In response to 'Asians for Hillary in Chicago';

I know many of you are afriad, however the next president of the United States will be someone who has proven to be a uniter of people; someone who represents the average age of American voters; somone who can bring new and 1st-time voters to the voting booth; someone who can utterly dominate the Republican nominee; someone who will be right from day one.... I'm sorry , but you (who have have always been divisive) will fortunately NOT decide who will be the next President of these UNITED STATES..

IGNORANCE will NOT play a part this time; The American people will chose the Natural Leader, regardless of HIS or HER ethnicity or gender.

Is it not ironic the President Barack Obama (a uniter) and the "4/4"th President of The United States of America is of African descent; while the ultimate uniter, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. left us on "4/4"1968 (April 4, 1968) almost exactly 40-years ago...

It's meant to be.....

-A REAL Asian American....

Patty   January 31st, 2008 11:12 pm ET

Tonight's debate was a win-win for all Democrats. Both candidates came across as bright, articulate, confident, and presidential. I came away thinking that either one will be a huge improvement over any candidate the Republicans may nominate. While I prefer Obama's leadership style and will vote for him in the primary, I came away thinking that I will also be proud to support Hillary if she makes it to the general election.

Thanks, CNN, for a great (and civil) debate!

carol   January 31st, 2008 11:12 pm ET

I have watched all the debates.This debate I thought that Obama looked impressive than Hillary.She really can't get away why she voted for the useless war. For that reason only she should not win. I think she skirted around the question on how long it would be before our troops where out of Iraq.I really think she say any thing to be the first lady president. go obama

Robin   January 31st, 2008 11:11 pm ET

Barack stands for more than an election to win. He represents a movement that will lead America to greatness again. We can hold our heads high when traveling abroad and not have to say we are from Canada for safety reasons. Think not only of youreself, think of future generations and vote for Barack Obama, before it is too late.

Troops 4 Obama   January 31st, 2008 11:11 pm ET

Obama, YES WE CAN

Dream On   January 31st, 2008 11:11 pm ET

I keep hearing this concept of how bringing people together creates change and through inspiration we can achieve change, now maybe I am a cynic, but life through the Civil Rights, NAM, NOW, and so on, never was by the people, it was people responding and acting to the clear vision presented and motivated by another or small group. I hear the talk, but where is the walk; there is no inspiring clear vision, only egoes.

js   January 31st, 2008 11:11 pm ET

I was pleased to see civility return tonight, but my comment is that I didn't hear anything from either one on what kinds of jobs are we going to have here in the US in the near future and what their positions were on protecting our borders. Both are very important issues.. did i miss something?

Jolly in NYC   January 31st, 2008 11:11 pm ET

Sorry so late to the game, but I just got home, as a I chose to watch the debate with some friends and citizens (700+ of us in a club here in the heart of NYC). NY is Obama country and I thought he more then held his own in the debate. He actually answered the questions, which says something. Senator Clinton stated it is a matter of trust, well then we better have someone in the white house who we can trust and that no doubt is OBAMA. It's about democracy not politics! Fired up and ready to vote in NYC

TMWHeaton   January 31st, 2008 11:10 pm ET

Well, Schneider- if you dont see big momentum coming on the part of Barack OBAMA, you're about to get blindsided. I'm sick of all you pundits and your cynical remarks about Obama's ability to win- you guys are such outsiders- you really have no idea what kind of energy is brewing within that movement. Well, we hopemongers are about to take all you pundits to school and show you what a real democratic nominee looks like!

Kyle   January 31st, 2008 11:10 pm ET

To add... Obama is always straight forward, concise, and intelligent. Obama is the real straight talk express!!!

sonya   January 31st, 2008 11:09 pm ET

earlier in the debate:
Obama..."the president has to be right from day one"

later in the debate:
Obama..."i'm not going to be right all the time"

well...which one is it??? i certainly think that from this debate, previous debates, previous speeches, etc..barack is not right at all for the presidency. he's nice and appeals to the public with his sentimentimental statements. but he clearly was not as informed or prepared as hillary.

hillary rocked him, as usual..

Chip   January 31st, 2008 11:09 pm ET

Anderson Cooper was inept last night. He not only excluded Ron Paul, but interrupted him on the rare occasions that he was addressed. What we watched was an endorsement for McCain and Romney from CNN. It was disgraceful. The media continues to ignore Ron Paul...I will continue to ignore CNN!

Matt   January 31st, 2008 11:09 pm ET

One argument Hillary had, which generated some positive response, was that it took one Clinton to clean after the first Bush and that it would take another to clean up after the second Bush. What should be realized by voters, is that ultimately it was the national bipolarization that the Clintons left behind which allowed the second Bush to beat Al Gore in the 2000 election.

Barack Obama offers something to this country that Hillary cannot. He will unite this country. His appeal is broad, ranging from the Liberal Ted Kennedy to the Conservative New York Post. United we will be stronger. We can't afford the same type of partisan politics that divide us as a nation. Given the strong distrust Hillary has among the Republican Party, she is incapable of bridging this gap. Barack Obama can. He will lead Democrats, Republicans, and Independents to a common goal, finally bringing this country together.

Pete   January 31st, 2008 11:07 pm ET

As an Obama supporter, I think Hillary was in fine form tonight. She's typically been a stronger debater. But I think the debate format is not the most important test of presidential leadership (although I think Obama does just fine). Mostly it tests a certain slickness. But think about it: other than campaigning, how often does a president really need the skills of mastering commercial-esque soundbites. More important, I believe, are the rallying, visionary speeches AND the informal chats with interviewers or advisors - both forms of which Obama excels.

toria   January 31st, 2008 11:05 pm ET

What about the economy, energy and social/global issues (darfur, kenya, aids, poverty)?

It was nice they didn't snipe at each other malicously

cathy in Vermont   January 31st, 2008 10:59 pm ET

Waiting moderation forever so I'll try again...
I heard the question to Hillary about her vote. She CANNOT ever admit she is wrong. That is why I cannot vote for her—she is just as arrogant as Bush.
Also someone here said we don't care about the war in Iraq–but about the economy. How can our economy ever improve until we get out of there and put the billions we are spending there to use here? Obama 08

rcm   January 31st, 2008 10:58 pm ET

Clinton answered questions clearly and detailed her plans to implement policies. Obama suggested many grand, vague ideas and gave few exact outlines on how he planned to achieve his goals. Furthermore, how can Obama tout his superior judgement and correctness when he added that he wants his cabinet members to say "no" to him and tell him when he is wrong because he "isn't right all the time." Hillary 2008.

Paul in Alexandria, VA   January 31st, 2008 10:58 pm ET

Amazingly, the economic issue is what voters say is most critical, even over Iraq, yet no one on the post-debate shows is discussing the differences in their views on how to deal with the sub-prime loan disaster.

Hillary believes in a command and control approach that would impose a government lock on interest rates to try to help homeowners losing their homes, but Barack pointed out that her approach would backfire, hurting even more people.

THIS IS IMPORTANT AND NO ONE IS TALKING ABOUT IT.

Barack would take a more intelligent and subtle approach. He laid out some specifics but made clear he would not make the problem worse to benefit from a short-term PR advantage by imposing an economically inert idea.

Combined with Barack's brilliant handling of the Iraq issue, he clearly won!

They both would be ready on DAY ONE, but only Barack would be RIGHT ON DAY ONE!

O-BA-MA! O-BA-MA! O-BA-MA! O-BA-MA! O-BA-MA! O-BA-MA! O-BA-MA! O-BA-MA!

MOLLY   January 31st, 2008 10:57 pm ET

PLEASE TELL WOLF HE SHOULD APPLY FOR National Enquirer . IT WAS TOO OBVIOUS WHAT HE WAS TRYING TO DO TONIGHT DURING THE DEBATE. SHAME ON HIM!

Angelica   January 31st, 2008 10:57 pm ET

How can you guys not pay attention to Healthcare? If healthcare is mandated and someone can't afford it...what will be the penalty for not being able to afford it? I like Obama's healthcare approach. I also trust his decision making because he nt only voted against, but he predicted what would happen if we invaided Iraq. Many people are afraid of something new, because the spirit of fear has been envoked for generations. Now we have a guy here tht envokes the spirit of hope, which will bring people together so that the change America needs can occur.

ss   January 31st, 2008 10:57 pm ET

all those saying hillary won today are clearly working for the clinton campaign and spamming this board. no way hillary won. it was a sort of draw...if anything obama was more eloquent and looked presidental. he looked like the guy which could give the courntry new direction.

about the edwards nomination – well edwards is an opportunist (just compare his position when he was running for 2004 and 2008). he wants to be vp. so he won't endorse anybody.

Newburgh, IN Man   January 31st, 2008 10:56 pm ET

.......

Derek, Jersey Shore

I AGREE WITH YOU

CNN is the other OBAMA Campaign Team...

Did you notice the abscence of Paul Begala and James Carville???

-

DJ   January 31st, 2008 10:55 pm ET

People say that Obama should have been stronger, but you're missing a very critical point. America would not stand for a black man picking on a white woman. He had to finesse his responses because that would be more paletable. If Obama had tried to nail Clinton to the wall, that would have backfired big time.

Lesley   January 31st, 2008 10:55 pm ET

As a Canadian who watched the democratic debate tonight, I must say Barack Obama would have my vote if I were an American, based on comments that were said.
I would also like to commend him on not lowering himself to Hillary's level by not mentioning 'race' as a reason to vote for him, the way Hillary mentioned 'gender' as a reason to vote for her.

Lesley Patterson

DP, Jacksonville, FL   January 31st, 2008 10:55 pm ET

The fact that Clinton and Obama played so well this evening is because the Republicans bickered so much last night. Whichever party went first was bound to learn from the mistakes of the others.

One point that hasn't been made much over the last few days: I can't see the DNC completely banning all the Florida or Michigan delegates in August, so a good showing next Tuesday may make it mathematically impossible for Obama to win the nomination.

Diana Holler   January 31st, 2008 10:55 pm ET

That was a love fest, not a debate, on CNN this evening. It looked weak and was drab, as our clothing will be if Hillary is elected as socialist dictator. We will all be wearing pantsuits with mandarin collars. Just what I want, the government taking care of my every little problem and me paying more taxes. God help us all!

Dusacre   January 31st, 2008 10:53 pm ET

Hillary cannot win against Mc Cain in November!

Jim Ragan   January 31st, 2008 10:53 pm ET

You're probably right, Bill. But I didn't hear anyone pose a question to Rodham-Clinton about why she is so disliked by close to 50% of the population. I'm a liberal democrat and one of the close to 50%.

my2centsworth   January 31st, 2008 10:53 pm ET

Obama was just ok but Hillary got my attention.

ji_john   January 31st, 2008 10:53 pm ET

When you're allowed to answer questions, the tenor of any debate will be different. In South Carolina, Obama was barely allowed to answer questions as Hillary was allowed to run interference and interupt Obama on key issues. In a much more civilized debate, as was the case tonight, Both canididates were allowed to answer questions and rebut statements made by each other. I think Schneider wanted to a war. It's enough that ABC's Brian Ross found video tape of Hillary as a board member with Walmart. Obama could have brought that up when Wolf Blitzer was trying to goad the candidates into controversy. They didn't bite, which is a good thing. Think of this; Edward Kennedy told the Clinton Camp to tone down the negative rhetoric, and when they didn't, he threw his support to Obama. Senator Kennedy's influence, as far as I'm concerned, has probably had an impact on this debate, because it was much more humane that recent ones. And Obama's answer on Immigration, though it might have offended some Blacks, really spoke to uniting the Latino and Black groups while pointing out the real culprit of each groups economic disadvatages–the exploitation of one group over another, driving down wages and damaging the economy. Get real, folks! The polls are tightening, and while Hillary looks like the frontrunner in the eyes of some, Obama has been known to close the gap fast. Three words: Iowa, South Carolina!

David Tokar   January 31st, 2008 10:52 pm ET

I am not sure that Hillary Clinton is the best candidate for president. She has to many ties to powerfull lobbiest's in government and I beleive she will continue down the same road we are on.
Also she is a member of the senate arms committe and looked at all the reports that favored going to war and did not or was not willing to see what came out later that these documents were out dated and had no merit and the reason for attacking Iraq was a politicaly motivated farse.
Also her involvement in White Water tells me she can not be trusted to tell the truth or do the right things this country needs.
This country is hemouraging money and not one person in Government seems to know what to do to stop it.

Ray   January 31st, 2008 10:52 pm ET

Wolf undermined Hillary more than Barak. The Iraq vote and her "control over Bill'.

Steve Jankowski   January 31st, 2008 10:52 pm ET

I'm sure most Democrats would love to see both of the people on that stage tonight as a presidential ticket, but the reality of the situation is that both Clinton and Obama have too high a "star power" to play second fiddle to anyone.

Honestly, I think the best, and most logical vice presidential candidate for the Democrats is Bill Richardson, for several reasons: 1) He is a governor, and has executive experience. 2) He's a Latino, and can help the Dems win in the southwest, which can be swing states. 3) He has been strong on the immigration issue, and will help whomever the presidential candidate is in November.

To those that think John Edwards should be the VP nominee, do you really think he'll want to go through that charade again? Obama doesn't want to play second fiddle to Clinton, no matter how good their friendship might be, and neither will Clinton.

My dream ticket: Obama / Richardson. Who could have imagined that? An African-American, and a Latino-American running for President.

Debby   January 31st, 2008 10:52 pm ET

I've never done so much responding before but it all boils down to the beauty of our Constitution and the freedom to exercise our freedom of speech and hey guys I luv ya even if you don't agree with my position. Talk to you on the next go round.

carrie   January 31st, 2008 10:52 pm ET

by the way, who is the person who came up with the pres-vice president ticket? Was that for comedic effect. These two candidates have been working their little booties off and I dont think number 2 will cut it. Didnt somone famous say if u want to get someone out of the way make them vice president??Who wants to be a stand-in???? Thanks Cnn for wasting those last minutes on that and not a crucial question!

Virginia   January 31st, 2008 10:52 pm ET

Obama is still counting on his "I was against the war from the beginning". It's getting old and it doesn't matter. The time is now and what they can do now to make a better future for America and its people. Hillary was specific, focused, calm, explained her positions in detail and was very "presidential". Obama didn't have his details down as well as she did and spent way to much time stammering. I believe tonight belonged to Hillary.

Joshua   January 31st, 2008 10:52 pm ET

All are better than Bush but one is better than them all. OBAMA!!!!!!!

Berni   January 31st, 2008 10:51 pm ET

Hillary won this debate despite the usual bias from Blitzer and other CNN pro Obama commentators like Gloria Borger et all. Your Canadain viewers can see through all your bias which is relentlessly displayed every day with every opportunity you can create. How reprehensible!

Dusacre   January 31st, 2008 10:51 pm ET

Clinton to clean after Bush? ?? The Clintons make far more mess than any Bush!
Give me a break!

trisha2   January 31st, 2008 10:51 pm ET

um obama said that he would be right on day one, which kind of contradicts what he later said - that he would not always be right.

not huge, but just saying; made me raise my eyebrows a bit.

all in all, i think hillary won.

Gary   January 31st, 2008 10:51 pm ET

If anyone watched the debate tonight, they would realize that it was all Senator Clinton's debate. She nailed Senator Obama at every turn. Obama reminded me of a young adult that was shown up by a more wise person. She clearly answered every question without any stuttering or dancing around the question at hand, with the exception of the question regarding a Clinton – Obama democratic ticket. Yes, I agree with the media in the fact that Obama was the one that voted against the war, but there is so much more going on with the U.S., that intelligent people cannot allow the fact that she was mislead in voting with Bush. Intelligent people need to see that Senator Clinton is fighting this battle without all the media support that Obama is receiving. Clinton is being attacked by every media outlet throughout the U.S. in favor of Obama. Could this be why he is so appealing to the younger generation? I think so. People of the U.S. please take a stand against the big money media and make up your own mind about who should be our next president. Don't allow other people to make this decision for you. One last thing, GO HILLARY!

Julie Schlarman   January 31st, 2008 10:51 pm ET

I am very concerned that Barack Obama takes takes the moral high ground with his position on Iraq. He states that he was against the war, which is in fact an easy statement to make when one has the benefit of hindsight. Obama was not even in the Senate when the unfortunate decisions to back President Bush and go to war were enacted. He has lost all credibility with me by taking such a smug and arrogant approach to the issue. And shame on all of the 'experts' and analysts for not doing their homework and confronting him on this point!

Teresa   January 31st, 2008 10:51 pm ET

I come to the conclusion there too many pundits with too much to say. Bill Bennett should not be talking about Moral Hygene.

Black Women in Florida for Hillary   January 31st, 2008 10:50 pm ET

Hillary clearly won tonight's debate.

Go Hillary '08

Kathy   January 31st, 2008 10:50 pm ET

The only problem is that no one really knows if Obama actually was against the war. I remember after 9/11 no one dared speak up because you where concidered un patriotic; He just isn't on record.

It's like being an arm chair quarter back there is no actual follow through that you have to account for.

Im Army   January 31st, 2008 10:50 pm ET

Socialism won tonight.

Garth   January 31st, 2008 10:49 pm ET

Obama needs to consider being her VP than consider trying to win the nominee.

JohnS   January 31st, 2008 10:49 pm ET

SOMEONE presented an INCOMPLETE sentence, as is typical of the Clintons:
Line of the night!!! IT TOOK A CLINTON TO CLEAN UP AFTER THE FIRST BUSH, IT WILL TAKE A CLINTON TO CLEAN AFTER THIS BUSH
BUT
It took the SINS of the Clintons to get the Republicans into the White House for 8 years;

It took the Clintons to bring the MORALS of this nation (few have respect for us today– Remember Gore and Kerry's losses?)

It took the Clintons to bring great and HUGE divides to this nation: RED States vs. BLUE states.

Oh, did you listen to Bill Benette's response to this statement: The Clintons with such MORAL CORRUPTION!!!!

hick   January 31st, 2008 10:49 pm ET

she was wrong about somthing like a war is very serious, we had thousand of lives lost ,wasted billion and billions of dollars thousand of people mained and killed there was over 200,000. iraq's killed in this war, that should have never been waged ,in the first place a mistake like that is not presidentail its really criminal she suported bush and bush need to be impeached for this criminal act

Ella   January 31st, 2008 10:49 pm ET

The United States of America NEEDS Barack Obama for President!
No one else will do, even though the others want it.
What the others (career politicians) want the country does not need.

Obama/Edwards 08

Yoda   January 31st, 2008 10:49 pm ET

The question is who is the better debater to go up against the Elephant boy!

Hillary can polish poop and make it shine!

Only Hillary can defeat the evil empire.

Debby   January 31st, 2008 10:49 pm ET

When I look at the numbers of response, more people out there should be responding to get the dialogue going about this historic event. It surprises me that more response aren't coming in. Let me know if you're selecting just certain responses or if so wouldn't it be neat to post the total reponses so Americans could know that many of us are interested and going to vote our choice in November.

Billy   January 31st, 2008 10:49 pm ET

I have posted three very reasoned comments and none of them were posted. You moderators are absolutely pathetic. Go get a real job.

Kim   January 31st, 2008 10:49 pm ET

The most important questions that everyone needs to decide for themselves are:
Whom do you TRUST? Who is the most HONEST?

Sorry Hillary – you don't have a prayer...

Seth   January 31st, 2008 10:48 pm ET

I will admit, I have been tough on Hillary at times over the past month. But I disagree that this debate served no purpose. I, for one, learned from this debate. I learned that all of the insults and hatred of the other candidate are pointless and absurd. The Democratic party has 2 candidates here who I would be 1,000,000 prouder to call my President than President Bush. For the first time in our history, our nominee will be either a black man or a woman, and I am so proud of that fact. I will be voting (well, already have via absentee ballot) for Obama, because of his positions, his inspiration and his wisdom. However, tonight showcased what could be if we get over our differences within our party and become a unified ticket. And so I pledge, as I hope many of you do, to stop the intra-party attacks. They only help the Republicans.

Obama/Clinton or Clinton/Obama 2008. Either way, we're in great hands. I'm a happy Democrat.

Janet   January 31st, 2008 10:48 pm ET

Hillary Clinton's Experience Includes

Corporate Lawyer for Rose Law Firm
While she was a corporate lawyer, she sat on the board of Walmart, TCBY, Legal Services, and she first lady of Arkansas. Then of course she was first lady of the united states. Then she only has a few more years in the senate then OBama. This is the kind of experiences she says makes her qualified to be president.

Excuse me while I vomit.

ANYTIME Bob Bennett and Pat Buchannon are your biggest defenders, then something is wrong, wrong, wrong.

Mary   January 31st, 2008 10:48 pm ET

I think that the debate was a very civilized debate. But there is one point which I have not heard any body bring both sides of what was said.
When Obama said "Not only do we have to be ready on day one, but we have to be right." I think he was basing that soley on the fact that he has always been against the war in Iraq. Because what I get from that statement is that He seems to be saying that he is the only person that will always be right in his decisions as present. To me that is a very arogant statement. Nobdy is right in their decisions 100% of the time. So for him to make a statement like that, to me any way, proves that he is not quite ready for the office of the president of the United States. Some times people will make a decision on an idea based on what is going on at the time, which latter may turn out to be wrong. But I don't think that makes them wrong or wrong for the presidents seat. Can Obama truthfully say that he has never made a decision, that after hind sight, that he wishes that he had not made. I think that every body has. And to me, that statement he made, seems to say that he would be the only person who would be right every time.That is just my take on it.

Jose Lopez   January 31st, 2008 10:48 pm ET

I feel that Senator Obama was the winner in this debate. From the beinning remarks to the end you can clearly see that his ideas are what is needed in America. I was for Senatoe Clinton at the beinning of the campaign but ;istening what both canidates have to offer, Senator Obama surely is the one that will bring the needed change to move forward in Amserica. I believe that both are strong candidates and that either one of them will be great for America. Howeever, in getting the entire nation back on it's feet, dealing with immigration, healthcare, and education, Senator Obama will clearly make the better decisions as President of the United States. Senator Obama sticks more to the issues than Senator Clinton, he has shown that his instincts and judgement are better than Senator Clinton's. His opposing the war from the beginning has my respect. His remarks about getting out but with respect is clearly the thing to do. Illegal immigrants is not the cause of unemployment in the U.S. it is the large corporations that have taken awau all of our manufacturing jobs overseas so that they can make a huge profit by having cheaper labor, using up all of our raw materials, and selling the Ameirican people finished goods that are of poor quality at a much higher cost. My vote is for Senator Obama.

Joanna Pena   January 31st, 2008 10:48 pm ET

Hillary has my vote. The BEST ticket is an Clinton / Obama ticket 08.

Steve   January 31st, 2008 10:48 pm ET

"This debate was like watching a mother trying to groom her son. Obama just sat there like a little boy listening to his mommy dearest speak for him."

You must be kidding. Obama is not a kid, he is the "Teflon Kid"!

Juanito, Washington, DC   January 31st, 2008 10:47 pm ET

Bill Schneider says : "In all, it was an unhelpful debate".

The debate was not for you, Mr Schneider. Get a grip.

Terry M, Portland Maine   January 31st, 2008 10:47 pm ET

It was a draw. but it was better than the previous bashing in the other debates and so much better than last night Repugnant debate. Better to have a debate like this than to to give the GOP talking points.

Hillary had the best line all night. cleaning up after bush .

TA   January 31st, 2008 10:47 pm ET

Hillary is hands down the real president to be and won this debate.

Hillary has the knowledge in approaching the health care issues, she gone through it and has studied the problem and the approaches.

Hillary can address the issues in pulling our troops out of Iraq and how it will need to take place so that US contractors, Iraqis who work for the us and all those others who would be in harms way.

Obama claim for change just does not have a real outline or specific approach it is more rhetoric.

Obama's past is an open ended question, he's too much a liberal, he was raised in a strong Muslim upbringing attending Muslim schools some of which are radical centers of muslim education. My concern is his past involvement in his childhood religious education is somethinig to be openly discussed.

ryan   January 31st, 2008 10:47 pm ET

In a general election, Hillary can NOT beat John McCain. The only way to unify the base of the Republican party is the Clintons Running. Obama held his own and has proved he has become a much better debater. McCain can't handle Obama on the war or on the economy (even John McCain admits he is a novice on the economy).

Yadayada   January 31st, 2008 10:46 pm ET

If Obama can get her to keep "cackling", he will win in a landslide.

Get real   January 31st, 2008 10:46 pm ET

Obama won this debate. The President right on day one.

Democrat in Georgia   January 31st, 2008 10:46 pm ET

Hilary was NOT gracious at all. Barack was respectful and gave her compliments. She acted like Bush, being stubborn and lacking any humility. She did NOT offer anything nice to say towards him or to give him rightfully just due. She talked around and would not admit to making a mistake on deciding to vote for the war. She would not accept responsibility. However, chose to explain and give excuses as to why she voted. Nor did she offer any apologies for their false campaigning tactics on his stance for this issue.

I found her to be very ungracious, arrogant and entitled. They are incorrect, it will NOT be a unified Democratic party. I will NOT vote for Hilary and Bill, should she win the nomination. Nor will many of my other democratic family and friends.

ANdY   January 31st, 2008 10:46 pm ET

And this goes for Blitzer, only a deaf person wouldn't see that you're for HILLARY!

Cnn better watch out for that BIAS!!!

OBAMA 08!!

PJ   January 31st, 2008 10:45 pm ET

Actually, Bill Schneider, the biggest response came when Clinton said it would take another Clinton to clean up after this Bush. Your golden boy Obama could just stare at the floor after that one.

John, NC   January 31st, 2008 10:44 pm ET

HILLARY WON THE DEBATE HANDS-DOWN, and is clearly better-prepared and reasoned for this high office.

I think what all Democrats should take from this is this: THERE ARE MORE THAT UNITES US THAN DIVIDES US!

While I have not given much thought to a CLINTON-OBAMA (or vice-versa) TICKET, I am beginning to warm up to it after tonight.

The reason is that both these minorities (in terms of political power) – Women and African-Americans – have been imposed upon our nation in a rather bizarre and unique way.

Hillary, at 61 years old, may not have another opportunity in her life-time, and her supporters are devoted and unflinching – myself included. Obama, though young and inexperienced, seems to have a tapped a source that is inspiring the usually apathetic young people. Therefore, if after Super Tuesday neither candidate scores a knockout, it may be in our Party's interest – at our convention – to trade and bargain delegates, and in the end both will have to be on ONE TICKET for peace to prevail!!!

What amazing times we live in!

Go HILLARY '08!

Agnes Owens   January 31st, 2008 10:44 pm ET

Hillary was outstanding! She has the "right stuff" to beat the republicans!

John   January 31st, 2008 10:44 pm ET

On a serious note I am in the military and when you vote on a war it takes your utmost intelligence and reasoning. Hillary voted for a war that has caused many of America's young men and women to lose their lives fighting for the country. Almost 4000 men and women have lost their lives and that is not to include the families hurt by this tragic war.

DONT ONLY BE READY ON THE FIRST DAY!

BE RIGHT ON THE :FIRST DAY!!!

GO OBAMA!

!!!REMEMBER THE TROOPS!!!!

Michael   January 31st, 2008 10:43 pm ET

Hillary cannot turn the country around!! SHE IS MORE OF THE SAME!!!

STAND STRONG FOR CHANGE WE CAN BELIEVE IN!!!

Do not fall for the SAME!!!

Clinton and Bush have destroyed this country!!!

Ben   January 31st, 2008 10:43 pm ET

Everyone on here is wrong! Edwards won! He wasn't even there and his message was brought by both candidates.

Merle McDonald   January 31st, 2008 10:43 pm ET

What a contrast to last night's Republican debate. Wolf Blitzer blitzed Anderson Cooper by a wide margin. Tonight's questions were thoughtful and the follow-up by panelists was excellent. Last night, the childish questions were disgraceful. Ignoring two of the four Republican candidates was a further embarrasemnt to CNN. Huckabee and Paul should have walked off the stage.

mark   January 31st, 2008 10:42 pm ET

clearly if this debate is a draw on many people's views and SEN HILLARY CLINTON is the front runner for those voting on super tuesday – Needless to say we are looking at a woman democratic presidential nominee here. Definite on this, that many people loved the looming prospects of a CLINTON-OBAMA ticket. some red states will surely change loyalty and swing their way with this awesome tandem. let's support theCLINTON-OBAMA 08 democratic ticket!

John   January 31st, 2008 10:42 pm ET

This country needs change. How will the Clintons be able to change the country if all the Republicans fight her all the way on the issues. Given the history of the clintons and republicans we are looking at a party war if she gets elected. Polarization is not what this country needs. Obama can in my opinion bring new talent to washington and unite the country.

Kathy   January 31st, 2008 10:42 pm ET

CNN and I agree. iIam almost scared. Thank you Bill for your honest thoughts. It will take another Clinton to clean up after another Bush.

I've said it before and I will say it again.......you go girl!

Hillary Clinton 2008

tom   January 31st, 2008 10:42 pm ET

HILLARY WON LETS NOT FIGHT ABOUT IT SHE DESERVES TO BE WHERE SHE IS . SHE IS ONE TOUGH WOMAN.I LIKE CLINTON /OBAMA WE HAVE TWO GREAT CANDIDATES WHO CLEARLY SEE WHERE THEY WANT TO GO....SUPPORT THESE TWO AND WE'LL HAVE A 16 YEAR RUN.

Ken   January 31st, 2008 10:41 pm ET

We finally get a civilized and informative debate about issues - the kind we've been saying we deserved - and the media calls it "unhelpful." Why? Because there were no great soundbites? No petty arguments to discuss over and over again? No film clips of perceived snubs? This was clearly the best debate of the season, maybe not for media hype, but for the voters. Isn't that why we have them in the first place?

Calvin Preddie   January 31st, 2008 10:41 pm ET

Does "awaiting moderation" mean that someone has to clear my comment? This appears to happen to me all the time. I don't thin k iIstretch the bounds of decency in my comments and I know that i have tried to be honest about my commments without calling people names. I trust that this time CNN will prove me wrong because all I am saying is that Mr. Obama, by saying he can not always be right, is admitting that he, too, is not always right, and he should allow that Ms. Clinton being wrong about something should not be ruled out as President for being wrong.

Ray   January 31st, 2008 10:40 pm ET

It took a Clinton to clean up after the first Bush and its gonna take another Clinton to clean up after thsi Bush!!

GO HILLARY!!!!

Rich In Seattle   January 31st, 2008 10:40 pm ET

I was really upset with CNN, the majority of the questions seemed directed towards Clinton and gave her the advantage. The debate format and questions seemed to be one sided. I guess it is the Clinton News Network.

After awhile I got tired of Clinton speaking just to hear herself speak.

Teresa   January 31st, 2008 10:40 pm ET

Why is it such a big deal that Hillary's husband was president. I didn't hear any of this rhetoric when George was running for president and his father preceded him. I think the media is looking for bad things about the Clintons, I hope she wins and you all stand around with egg on your faces. Furthermore, why doesn't somebody look in Obama's closet. Nobody is perfect!!!!!!

Indepedant in 08   January 31st, 2008 10:39 pm ET

Its so funny reading the comments on here. Its clear who are the Hillary supporters from the Obama supports, are their any neutral people who can comment on the issues and not their personal preference? Look the bottom line is this Obama/Clinton is not going to be the ticket no matter how nice they played in this debate their is still bad blood between these two.

Now, in reference to a genral election if McCain is the nominee he will destroy Mrs. Clinton on the Iraq war and policy issues hands down. That will be the main premis of his campaign and he will drive that point home. He will point out every chance he gets that she flip flop on the issue. Second, he will point out exactly what Wolf mentioned in the debate, and that is you are not electing just Hillary Clinton, but both Bill and HIllary Clinton, so who is the president? Obama has a better chance against McCain, and every poll shows that, but that doesnt mean he will win either.

Pete   January 31st, 2008 10:39 pm ET

I like Obama's comment that he's not going to be right all the time while he's stance is that you want a person that will be right from day one.

Anita Brown   January 31st, 2008 10:39 pm ET

Hillary won, hands down. While Barack is careful not to upset anyone by requiring them to insure themselves against being a future drain on taxpayers and the healthcare industry, careful not to acknowledge why immigration is such a tough issue, careful not to say just how he would go about extracting us from Iraq, he proves himself to be what he is – a very careful politician. He would be out of his depth as president, and nothing would happen for 4 straight years – unless her dedication to the people of this world caused Hillary to agree to be VP and do everything she would have done as President. A woman would get all the work done while a man enjoyed the glad-handing and glory – that, sadly, would be a truly American presidency.

Matt   January 31st, 2008 10:39 pm ET

Obama won the Debate...

TL   January 31st, 2008 10:39 pm ET

Hillary won this debate. She has a command of the issues. Give credit where it is due.

Man Obama   January 31st, 2008 10:39 pm ET

I think Carl Bernstein summed up the debate best: Hillary Clinton proved she would be the best Health Secretary Ever, and Barack Obama the Best President!

OBAMA / Edwards 2008

jocade   January 31st, 2008 10:38 pm ET

The problem is that they are all politicians and they are saying what they need to get elected. I believe that they need to give up some of the perks that they get in washington first and then hit the american people second. If they had to live with an HMO and social security then it would all get fixed. If I had to choose, I would have to pick Obama as I think he has new ideas from a younger generation. Things have changed quickly in the last 20 years and we do not need the same old politics.

Susan   January 31st, 2008 10:37 pm ET

I watched pretty much the entire debate. I think other than the Iraq war issue, Hillary was considerably better. The Iraq issue is interesting because she stands by her naive position that authorizing military use is not authorizing war which plainly Barack understood. However, she had good energy, was fairly detailed, whereas Barack had many highs and lows during the night. He is best when he can "freestyle" his answers. He did a few of those tonight, but when asked on the spot questions he sputters and lacks depth. The fact is he doesn't have nearly the command of each issue as does Hillary. I would also say that Barack is fixated on McCain, whereas Hillary is concerned with the man sitting next to her. It was evident tonight that Barack is looking very far ahead to his many debates with McCain. Interesting.....

Mark   January 31st, 2008 10:36 pm ET

Hillary is a divider, Barack is a uniter! NO MORE CLINTONS OR BUSHs!

Scott   January 31st, 2008 10:35 pm ET

THANK YOU to the folks who said a) whenever ANY media outlet says it was a 'draw' , that means Hillary won with a clear 'A' to her competitors' 'B', and b) Hillary has won EVERY DEBATE. Finally, some voices of reason! Barack may win in a scripted, tele-prompted speech environment, but that is not how the executive branch is run! It is run more along the lines of a debate format, where you have to reason and push forward a point of view with an opposing side, and if anyone thinks Hillary doesn't come out clear and above in that regard, then they haven't been watching the same debates I have.

Christa   January 31st, 2008 10:35 pm ET

I don't understand why you default to the notion that Clinton "won" the debate. After every debate, someone from CNN declares this because it's an easy answer. Clinton gave her standard performance and avoided admitting that she was wrong on the most important issue– Iraq.

Obama gave a strong argument on why he would not look like a hyocrite going up against the republicans.

He gave an enlighted and refreshing look at his take on accountability and transparency with broadcasting healthcare debates rather than doing it behind closed doors. This cuts to one of their key differences in holding public office, most notably getting rid of the special interest powers that hinder progress in Washington.

These are intellectual arguments that have a great deal of weight with me as a voter.

George   January 31st, 2008 10:34 pm ET

IMO I think both really stayed on their message but I think Obama clearly made inroads with explaining his policies much more clearier then he has been in other debates. I think Clinton took to much time with answering the questions almost trying to take the spot light and was speaking so much to the super tuesday states. this was very tactical and smart on the clinton machine.

Bruce Dickinson   January 31st, 2008 10:32 pm ET

I don't agree that the debate was a draw. I thought that Barack Obama provided better answers to many of the questions. He has the ability to unite people with differing viewpoints and to inspire people to give their best. I'm supporting Barack Obama at my Colorado caucus on Tuesday.

jeff   January 31st, 2008 10:32 pm ET

i just heard clinton's iraq argument and it makes perfect sense, so the media's heavy push that she did poorly on this will divide sharply along gender lines. in other words women will see the media's heavy hand here as sexist and they may well be right, media, so i think better reflection is needed here by the media.

ME, CA   January 31st, 2008 10:32 pm ET

Mrs. Clinton won the debate! She was calm, cool and relaxed. I was watching the cnn.com real life reaction and she brought her lines up higher most of the time. By the way, I think I finally figured out what it is about him that I can't stand, it's his "ums and humms", albeit a bit more suttle. Deja vue. Sorry, I want no one in office that will even minutely remind me of the person we have there now.

Igor   January 31st, 2008 10:32 pm ET

Yes the debate was a draw. Hillary scored good point on certain items and Barrack did the same. I think in the end, we will have Obama/Clinton or Clinton/Obama ticket and I would, as a Obama supporter, support this a 100%.

Michael   January 31st, 2008 10:32 pm ET

You hillary lovers are too unstable for America. You would have cried if he attacked her and now because he took it easy on her because she is a women,

You say she won. OBAMA kicked BUTT!!!

JE   January 31st, 2008 10:31 pm ET

I find it rather interesting that the majority of questions were directed to Clinton and the results are in her favor. Hillary never stopped talking.

Tim   January 31st, 2008 10:31 pm ET

Hillary won this debate. She was intelligent and graceful. She did a very good job.

Abban   January 31st, 2008 10:31 pm ET

Overall both candidates presented a very mature and professional approach to questions/issues. Senator Obama positioned himself very well on issues especially explaining the details of differences on health and foreign policies. Senator Clinton wasn't too clear in her counter response to issue of her funding for health care (as the evaluation by Senator Obama suggests the subsidy funding she considers is not enough)
Senator Obama is also very strong on foreign policy especially the issue of Iraq.

Clayton   January 31st, 2008 10:31 pm ET

I can't believe these Hillary supporters. She even take's Barack's quotes and misconstrues them. Specifically the "Democrat's have the ideas" (That's not a quote). I don't believe she should be the CEO of our country. She supported the war at the beginning now she doesn't, just for the vote.

Matthew Lynn   January 31st, 2008 10:31 pm ET

Bill sums it up pretty well. I will say that, as usual, Wolf Blitzer and team were pretty harsh on Mrs. Clinton – the lowest blow, it's worthlessness echoed by the loud and plentiful boos in the crowd, was his attempt to label her naive. CNN has been doing it's best to discredit her. Luckily for her, she didn't seem to let it bother her. Obama could have been more agressive if he wanted to help his chances, but the road he took was higher, and therefore more presidential. The both looked like great presidential material tonight. Huge contrast to last night's Republican whining and bickering.

Jared Madison   January 31st, 2008 10:31 pm ET

Blitzer was way too biased in this debate. I almost threw up several times at the softballs he threw her, and how he attacked obama.

It was a tie for that reason alone...

Hillary better watch out.

Scott, Atlanta   January 31st, 2008 10:31 pm ET

IT'S GONNA TAKE ANOTHER CLINTON TO CLEAN UP AFTER ANOTHER BUSH MESS

Hillary '08

Russ   January 31st, 2008 10:31 pm ET

I'm not sure why the media is so interested in painting this as a draw or a Clinton win, but whatever. Of course, by continuing starting the questioning with Clinton, it helped her make the first statement, which is always important. It's unfortunate that the questions weren't more evenly spread.

Both candidates were very strong tonight, but Obama was clearly the winner in my eyes, and despite the media's desire to make it seem like Clinton won, I believe the polls will speak for themselves.

I too, at this point, would be content with either candidate being the nominee, but I still will vote for Obama and hope he is our nominee.

A great debate.

Tobi   January 31st, 2008 10:31 pm ET

NOPE. If its even close to a perceived "draw' that means Obama won. She is the supposed legacy, the Clinton-after-ANOTHER-Bush, (what a rehearsed line). If the tenured Ms. Clinton really won, she would have WON, not have people saying "they were pretty much a draw".

He won.

JWZ   January 31st, 2008 10:31 pm ET

Would they please stop saying healthcare.
They BOTH are offering health INSURANCE
Insurance does NOT equal CARE
DIFFERENT
PLEASE
THIS CONVERSATION MATTERS AND NEEDS TO BE TURNED AROUND

Lets get Insurance out and care in.

PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE

Aidyn   January 31st, 2008 10:30 pm ET

Hillary won and there is no question about it. She was strong on all other issues except Iraq, she was strong on 4 out of the 5 issues.

Terry   January 31st, 2008 10:30 pm ET

I guess I'm confused why so many people believe HIlary did a better job. I suppose if people were looking or a fight from him and were disappointed that instead he was presidential, professional and diplomatic, then yes she won.
But I believe he won, because those same qualities will be needed by our next leader and President-good judgement.

Janel, St. Paul, MN   January 31st, 2008 10:30 pm ET

I agree that both Senators - Obama and Clinton - represented the Democratic party very well. I was very relieved that they both acted presidential and didn't fall for questions that were clearly asked to divide them on personality and campaigns.

Overall, I think Obama won the debate. He was very clear on his positions, while respectful of Senator Clinton. For me, she still comes across as patronizing, and I just can't get the thought of her husband's hateful attack against Senator Obama.

I'm hoping and praying that America will be led to vote for Obama. I'd just love for him to represent me as the leader of the free world.

Michael   January 31st, 2008 10:30 pm ET

STAND STRONG FOR CHANGE!!!

OR

FALL FOR THE SAME!!!

David S., Chicago, IL   January 31st, 2008 10:30 pm ET

Rock on Obama! The movement goes on....HIllary would make a great VP – a promotion from first lady

Obama '08

Josie   January 31st, 2008 10:30 pm ET

Hillary won! No doubt. Stop giving all the points to Obama. His strongest applause lines are when he talks about what he didn't have an opportunity to be involved in.

JohnS   January 31st, 2008 10:30 pm ET

For someone who has been "tauting experience" all along, I just was quite un-impressed by Hillary's performance tonight–

It is important to be RIGHT on DAY one! Go Obama/Edwards!!!!

Adarrah for Obama   January 31st, 2008 10:29 pm ET

Obama gained ground. He answer the where's the beef question for all the cynics. He got the beef baby!!

Obama 08'

John ny, ny   January 31st, 2008 10:29 pm ET

IT TOOK A CLINTON TO CLEAN UP AFTER THE FIRST BUSH, IT WILL TAKE A CLINTON TO CLEAN AFTER THIS BUSH

bang on!!!!!!!!!

Ryan M.   January 31st, 2008 10:29 pm ET

Totally Disagree.... A stalemate with the Incumbent is bad for the Incumbent. It shows weakness... Obama's campaign will go forward beyond Super Tuesday... He will be amply funded by people who want change.... She would need to beat him decisively to do so... Not gonna happen.

Hillary did not help herself on Iraq. Just because the tone was cordial doesn't mean she didn't lose some points.

Independent   January 31st, 2008 10:29 pm ET

You look anywhere in the media, every where you will read about the inspiration that Obama generate in audience. I watched todays debate and failed to see anything of that sort. On the other hand Hillary sounded to have more grasp on all of the subjects that had been discussed and her answers were more clearer and detail oriented, suggesting that she think through the issues, which is highly needed in next American President

David S., Chicago, IL   January 31st, 2008 10:29 pm ET

`

Tina Sanchez   January 31st, 2008 10:29 pm ET

Bill Schneider is falling to the pressure of the Hillaryites on here crying that he's being too hard on her.

Pure BUNK.

Bill. Go look at every single poll on this debate that is available across the internet and you'll see that it was far from a draw!

Even your own CNN panel gave it to Barack 3 to 1, with Bill Bennett being the only one who claimed Clinton did better.

Face facts ---- Barack Obama knocked this one out of the park!

"Draw" my buttocks.

Joe Nada   January 31st, 2008 10:29 pm ET

Hillary won the debate in my opinion. Obama's insistence that he knew better on Iraq has become hackneyed, he wasn't even in the senate so it's really a hypothetical. For all of his eloquence Hillary has a better grasp of the issues that matter to me, the economy and health care. Hillary learned from her mistake on Iraq and she'll get the US out quickly but not in a rush, which is what Obama seems to be proposing. Obama made some major goofs that will hurt him if he gets the nomination, coming out strongly in favor of driver's licenses for undocumented workers and his claim that the US lacks the power to protect its interests are the two most glaring ones. This debate won't change the minds of Obama's supporters or Hillary's supporters, but to me it made Hillary look in command. That might push undecided voters to her.

John ny, ny   January 31st, 2008 10:28 pm ET

Why is anderson cooper saying That Obama voted against the Iraq war. He never voted because he wasn't in the senate.
Can you please correct him on this. I just watched him on 360

jmel   January 31st, 2008 10:28 pm ET

People, the last Clinton administration, although not without its minor problems, left this country with a surplus, a strong economy and well regarded internationally. So why would we go with an unknown, inexperienced but well spoken junior senator? Hillary is what this country needs – she will help us turn this country around. GO HILLARY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Andy   January 31st, 2008 10:28 pm ET

My opinion from watching and really listening to this debate was that Obama did in fact come of as being in command, on target, well thought-out and indeed displayed a high degree of leadership qualities,

His approach is somewhat different than Clinton's and I am leaning toward voting for him although I am not 100% sure at this time. He brings a new sense of excitement, of commitment.

Hillary really did effectively exhibit her experience and knowledge of the real issues and has sound solutions. She is very bright, very sincere and would make an excellent choice for the president of the United States.

They both have different formulas and answers to combat the issues that face America. It is give and take. Good aspects and perhaps not so good aspects of each solution.

My solution: An Obama Clinton Presidential ticket will significantly dominate any Republican match. (Or Clinton Obama ).

Was there a clear "winner" of tonight's Debate? . . . No

Lisa Lee, Dallas, TX   January 31st, 2008 10:28 pm ET

I think Bill Schneider comes off as pretty biased.

Dems'08   January 31st, 2008 10:28 pm ET

I fundamentally disagree, Bill. Hillary blows Obama out of the water on substantive issue. Yes, he has an advantage on Iraq, but only because he was not in the Senate at the time for us to know how HE WOULD HAVE voted. Period. We just don't know. On all other issues she is unequivocally superior, especially on healthcare, no question. She IS the more qualified candidate.

Independent in Texas   January 31st, 2008 10:28 pm ET

I did not hear Hillary answer the question of how she would enforce people enrolling in her healthcare plan.

Annoyed voter   January 31st, 2008 10:28 pm ET

I for one was happy that this was not a slugfest, as I thought it led to more substantive discussion, and there overall positions reminded us starkly of the differences between their (relatively) similar positions and the positions of the republicans, who all seem anxious to claim the Reagan legacy. To me, the fact is Clinton is extremely well versed in knowledge and policy, she has been around the world, she knows both people and the issues, and those have to be strengths. Obama provides a new face, without quite as much experience. I think overall, either of them provide more chance for change, in the right direction to strengthen our country, then most of the republican candidates (Ron Paul is the exception, and maybe a duck out of water in the republican race).

Change   January 31st, 2008 10:28 pm ET

Well, nice Love Fest. It certainly made my mind up, as I am refusing to go with what I am told I should be and I am writing in Edwards as my vote for real change!

Anonymous   January 31st, 2008 10:27 pm ET

This debate was like watching a mother trying to groom her son. Obama just sat there like a little boy listening to his mommy dearest speak for him.

It will be pathetic if they are running the country.

Susan   January 31st, 2008 10:27 pm ET

Barack is now trying to make the argument that he can beat John McCain and Hillary can't. First, one would have to agree with that. I don't think that is true. Second, if he is making the argument that he was against the war in Iraq from the start will help him win, I think that isn't true either. While I was never for the Iraq war, the majority of Americans were, including a large percentage of democrats. Hillary voted on a strong resolution against Iraq. If she hadn't voted in favor of the Iraq resolution at the time, given the fervor to go to war, she would have been crucified. Now it would be very difficult for the Republicans to say that she is "soft " on terror/war. This argument is used every time there is an election against the democrats by the republicans and it will be used in this upcoming election. The Republican candidate will have a hard time saying Hillary is soft, but will have no problem saying that about Barack.

Don   January 31st, 2008 10:26 pm ET

Hillary Clinton can bring the best people together to address all of the problems we have in this country.

Shirley   January 31st, 2008 10:26 pm ET

Clearly, Hillary Clinton was the more presidential of the two. I love them both and I hope they do form a ticket. But Hillary is absolutely the more mature, experienced candidate. It's a tenous world and we need her commitment and good judgement to deal with it right now! It will do Barack a world of good to be VP and then our next president when he has the right maturity and more real time experience. God Bless them both and our USA!!

vudeshie   January 31st, 2008 10:26 pm ET

I think the best ticket that could possibly be for USA and the Democrats is Clinton and Obama in that order. He is a great speaker but not as experienced in Washington as she is. He as Vice President will be her conscience and they will be a good team together and beat the republicans hands down. Also by then many white americans (especially in the deep South) will get used to a black man in the highest offices of the country helping his electability. If they do well together in eight years he will surely be the next POTUS and ensure 16 years of uninterrupted Democratic rule. Enough to put a few judges on teh Supreme Court.

Go Clinton/Obama.

For sake of disclosure I am not as US citizen and cannot vote, but Hillary's grasp of the issues impresses me and so I support her. BTW I am not a white male !

Mark   January 31st, 2008 10:26 pm ET

With all due respect to Bill, I think he's missing an important point. Obama's stock has been rising in national polls – rapidly, as more people hear his message. Clinton's has been dropping, slowly, but dropping. This debate won't stop those trend lines, if anything, it will show some of those on the fence that, as you say, Obama looks presidential. That counters one of the main arguments Clinton is making against him – his experience. Today potentially went a long way to put that rap to rest – he looked ready.

Steve Jankowski   January 31st, 2008 10:26 pm ET

This might be a bit of a stretch, but does anyone think that the Bush Administration might be trying to diminish the Iraq issue and raise the economy and other issues the Republicans "own" because they would rather see Clinton be the Democratic nominee in November.

If it's been said once, it's been said a hundred thousand times: Clinton would unite the Republicans against her.

Maybe the Republicans are a little worried about Barack Obama as the Democratic nominee because they feel he could beat them. Iraq is one of Obama's strongest issues, but the talk isn't about that. It's the economy and health care, which Republicans have been much stronger on, historically.

rusty   January 31st, 2008 10:26 pm ET

I respectfully disagree Bill. I think Obama won the debate, though it was close. I think it helps Obama in the long run, because the trends are in his favor, and he did nothing to put a stop to those trends. The Clinton camp knows by now that February 5th will not inaugerate Hillary, and , the longer this goes, the stronger Obama will get.

Louis   January 31st, 2008 10:26 pm ET

HILLARY WON!!!

J. McCaskill   January 31st, 2008 10:26 pm ET

I agree 100% that Clinton took this debate. Don't get me wrong Senator Obama is a great person and leader. However, people wake up everyday with hope. People pray for hope. We do not need inspirational speeches. We need results and substance. Senator Clinton will get results. She talks about her policies with great energy letting us know she know's what she is talking about. Hope and inspiration do not bring change. Hope along with action will bring about change.

Hillary Clinton '08'

laura   January 31st, 2008 10:25 pm ET

Congratulations to CNN for a well run debate with real, fair, substantative questions. Other shamelessly biased networks like MSNBC should take note. It's too bad Barack and HIllary can't come together for the Dream Team – now that would really be historic ... and what every Democrat secretly wants.

nazirmo   January 31st, 2008 10:25 pm ET

Best line came from Hillary – it took first Clinton to clear the mess left behind by the first Bush and it will take another Clinton to clear up the mess left behind by the second Bush.

eiohr   January 31st, 2008 10:25 pm ET

It was good enough to have this Republican decide to vote Democratic in the presidental vote come November.

James   January 31st, 2008 10:25 pm ET

I felt that towards the beginning it was a draw. Towards the end however, Hillary had some trouble with the Iraq issue, which was expected.

Janice   January 31st, 2008 10:25 pm ET

I thought he should have come harder too. Too bad, so sad. He's the better choice. If Hillary wins, I will cry daily.

Vivian Torregrossa   January 31st, 2008 10:25 pm ET

I think they were both too concerned about not behaving like they did at the last, or like the republicans did yesterday. Though I would have loved for Obama to shine a little more. He neded to stand out more and take control. They both did fine, I have a trust issue with hillary clinton. I do not believe her, I think she is a true politician. She will say anything she believes people want to hear. Obama has what it takes to take our country through the tough times we face as we recover some of our relationships in the world. We need someone just like him! I hope that the Amercian people will see that. I also hope that they're able to see through Hillary, she showed her true colors, so did Bill over the past few weeks. They are not presidential at all. They are when their campaign insists they be. Not because that is truly who they are.

hick   January 31st, 2008 10:25 pm ET

lets all face it if obama was white this election would be over a long time ago the only reason she hillary clinton is still in this race is that she is the wife of a former president

jimmy valente   January 31st, 2008 10:25 pm ET

OBAMA WON STRATEGICALLY.
HE IS THE REAL PRESIDENT
California JVA

Janet   January 31st, 2008 10:25 pm ET

Hillary clearly lost this debate. Any fair-minded person could see that. I don't think Obama had to challenge Hillary because that would be somehow implying she is the presumptive candidate. All he needed to do was lay out his arguments. It was clear that Hillary had trouble on the Iraq war, which is still a very big concern for every day Americans. The Iraq war has contributed to the economic problems we experience. She would just not ADMIT she made a mistake. She reminds me of George Bush in this respect. I think Obama's discussion on policy issues were very clear and straightforward. Hillary seemed to muddle certain issues and attack Bush's administration. Hillary, we already understand how badly Bush has screwed up our country, what will YOU do? She isn't saying anything differently then Obama, but her track record does not support her argument.

gail   January 31st, 2008 10:24 pm ET

I was very pleased that issues I really care about were discussed. This debate made the republican debate seem like school-boy horseplay.

lc   January 31st, 2008 10:24 pm ET

????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

HOW MANY MORE WARS WILL CLINTON'S "EXPERIENCE" LEAD US INTO?

WHO WILL SACRIFICE THEIR LIFE OR THEIR CHILD FOR HER MISTAKES???????

Voters IRAQ is more than a debate issue. It is LIFE or DEATH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

MattB   January 31st, 2008 10:24 pm ET

Clinton's vote to authorize the war was based on bad intelligence from the Bush Administration and their hidden agenda. The longer you serve in office, the more heavily scrutinized you are because you have voted on more issues and no one is right 100% of the time.

Sreedevi   January 31st, 2008 10:24 pm ET

It depends on how people look at things. It almost seems, because of Obama's optimism and looking towards the future pitch that he has all the great ideas and solutions to make things work. But overall, they had similar ideas. The reason why Hillary ended up talking more than Obama is because the difference is she had not just thought about the ideas, but also plans for executing them. She does have a lot more experience in that sense. Her failures have allowed her to look at situations differently in order not to fail. It sounds like she would be less likely to make certain mistakes, as she' s had time to reflect. He will undoubtedly make a few mistakes only because he really hasn't had a chance to deal with all the different personalities as much as she has.

I think looking at how they do things in their private lives is much better. You can really see how they do things, or how they would be affected. Obama is the son of an immigrant and lived in Indonesia as a child. He has not just been around the world as a politician, but as a real person experiencing different cultures. So, I have to wonder just how well he could do as far as improving international relations will ALL the other countries which ultimately would help out with terrorist threats. I don't think Hillary has had this type of experience in her private life.

Either way you look at it, tough decision.

Juan   January 31st, 2008 10:24 pm ET

Sorry pal, you're wrong.

Linn   January 31st, 2008 10:24 pm ET

Interesting that Schneider would give Clinton the edge overall when he spent most of the debate criticizing her. I think Obama looked and sounded presidential and reasoned and articulate. He's the one.

La'Kitgum   January 31st, 2008 10:23 pm ET

Bottom line is that Schneider was a biased moderator overly against Hillary. Bottom line is also that Obama was not clear on substance and specifics. I pity any level-headed person wanting him to lead this great country with such warpped ideas. I am Black and a very proud supporter of Hillary.

Newburgh, IN Man   January 31st, 2008 10:23 pm ET

.....

HIIIIIII – LLLLL – LLLLLL – AAAAAA – RRRRRR – YYYYYYYY

SHE WON! SHE WON!!! SHE WON!!!

CHECK THE ONLINE METER!!!

THE NUMBERS ARE OUT 60% to 40% Split

DEMOCRATIC PARTY WON TONIGHT!!!!!

WE MADE HISTORY!!!

I LOOK FORWARD TO A HILLARY/OBAMA TICKET YEAH!

IT FEELS GOOD TO BE A DEMOCRAT!!!

YEAH!!!

BRING BACK THE GOOD OLD 90's

GOOD TIMES ARE BACK AGAIN!

SHE KNOWS WAHT SHE DOING

Steve   January 31st, 2008 10:23 pm ET

Your not looking close enough Bill. Because Obama took the high road and didn't go after Hillary on these issues, he cemented himself as the concilliatory unifier. As the person who isn't pushing the "vote for me" stance. Instead he is working to strengthen the DEMS base by showing that they can work together. He did well... so did Hillary. It's gonna be tough to decide between them after tonight's showing.

CA Voter   January 31st, 2008 10:23 pm ET

I agree, the debate was a draw and that helps Hillary. We FINALLY got to see a real debate. Kudos to the candidates and CNN.

I support Barrack, but I think we saw a "real" Hillary tonight. She seemed very comfortable. I respect her, but still hopes she loses Tuesday and moving forward.

Fired up and ready to go with Barrack Obama!

Chuck Mason   January 31st, 2008 10:23 pm ET

For the Republicans, Iraq will be the ballgame in the fall. They will paint the Democrats as unpatriotic to pull out of Iraq, wrapping themselves in the flag again. I think Obama is the strongest candidate because he can say, without any wobbles, that he opposed the war from the start, and he did. And, more importantly, he said he will be "right" from day one. Obama wins in a close one.

NN   January 31st, 2008 10:22 pm ET

Hillary was great. She hold her ground.

Hillary 08!

John   January 31st, 2008 10:22 pm ET

Hillary Clinton clearly won this debate, she has won ALL of the debates. Sen. Clinton is the most intellient, most qualfied, most politically skilled candidate in the race of ANY party. She will make a GREAT President! Sen. Obama's "I was a community organizer in Chicago" experience can't compare to Sen. Clinton's vast experience. No contest. The media needs to stop the 24/7 attack on Hillary Clinton. Bring back Paul Begala and James Carville. Get rid of the strange rookies CNN has brought in. Oh, and fire Glenn Beck, he's terrible. You need female show hosts.

Right on Day 1   January 31st, 2008 10:22 pm ET

I fear you may be right Bill. But if Obama was too aggressive, he would have lost.

His only hope is that enough people got exposure to him finally, to say "Oh that's why everyone is so impressed".

But I do think he won, though just barely.

mike   January 31st, 2008 10:21 pm ET

Go Hillary!!!!

Marie   January 31st, 2008 10:21 pm ET

I saw the differences between the candidates. And I think it was helpful. Without acrimony, I heard the candidates explain their stances on two hotbed issues: universal healthcare and immigration (esp. drivers' licenses for immigrants). I do not think it was a draw. I think Obama was the stronger, more presidential debater; I think Hillary could not answer the idea of a co-presidency with her husband and could not admit she made a mistake on the war.

Billy   January 31st, 2008 10:21 pm ET

Tonights debate between Hillary and Barak was painfully boring. If this is CNN's idea of a debate, I will watch CSI or Discovery Channel next time. Questions asked in tonight's debate my as well have started with the singing of kum-bi-yah. Please don't bother hosting debates that CNN isn't prepared for.

jen-in-ca   January 31st, 2008 10:21 pm ET

What i saw was an inexpericed candidate learning from the best and the next president of the United States. Hillary won the debate hands down. She made her points very clearly and explained her Iraq vote. I know it's hard for the "I hate Hillary "media to admit to. Didn't you watch the live vote. I did. Hillary won hands down.

Jay   January 31st, 2008 10:21 pm ET

Bill, you are forgiven..lol
I think your wrap up was very concise. It was a draw in my opinion also.
Obama and Hillary both did very well.

Michelle, AL   January 31st, 2008 10:21 pm ET

I think Obama could lay his head on the table and drool on a napkin and Gloria Borger would say he won. Why doesn't she just marry him?

Vincent   January 31st, 2008 10:20 pm ET

Line of the night!!! IT TOOK A CLINTON TO CLEAN UP AFTER THE FIRST BUSH, IT WILL TAKE A CLINTON TO CLEAN AFTER THIS BUSH

John William   January 31st, 2008 10:20 pm ET

i agree

Terry   January 31st, 2008 10:20 pm ET

OBAMA!!! OBAMA!!!OBAMA!!!

Again Bill, I totally agree with you. I thought Obama had to do more to peel away some of her popular votes but I do believe in hope and hope comes from God. So.....

Mike   January 31st, 2008 10:20 pm ET

I think use miss the importance of the point Sen. Obama made about him being right about Iraq from day one. He isn't trying to peel voters away from Sen. Clinton as much as he is trying to convince undecided and uncommitted voters that he is the best nominee for the Democratic party. And on the issue of Iraq he has a real argument that if Sen. Clinton is the nominee that the Republicans will attack her and call her a flip-flop.

Jeremy Evans   January 31st, 2008 10:20 pm ET

I know that this comment will never make it onto this blog, but I thought that Blitzer was unbelievably biased in this debate. He harped on Obama on a number of pointed issues but never missed an opportunity to toss Clinton a softball. Blitzer abused his responsibility as moderator of this debate and should be admonished by CNN. Period.

Tom Good, Bakersfield, California   January 31st, 2008 10:20 pm ET

Although it was a semi-lovefest, I though Obama was the winner. He was very articulate, answered the questions fully, seemed genuine and presidential. Clinton did ok, but was a litle less than forthcoming on a couple of issues–Iraq and the question about her husband's influence in her campaign. And there was that laugh again! There was nothing new, but it was a good couple of hours for politicos.

DJK   January 31st, 2008 10:20 pm ET

The media hates Clinton so much, you know that when they call a debate a draw that really means she won.

She was brilliant tonight, folks, sorry. Even my Obama friends admitted it.

James   January 31st, 2008 10:20 pm ET

Mr Schneider, I've been following your postings throughout the night and you are definitely shirking on your journalistic responsibility of staying neutral and objective as a commentator and analyst. I hope this does not translate into your analysis on TV later/tomorrow. Please don't take sides. It's very disappointing, I'm sorry to say.

E.E.   January 31st, 2008 10:20 pm ET

Obama made his point more clear and understandable than Clinton did.

all in all, it was a good debate.
both were trying to suck up to the ex-Edwards supporters

Jeanette J   January 31st, 2008 10:20 pm ET

Of course you didn't. But you can bet a lot of intelligent Democrats did. I think they both earned points tonight. They both were articulate, informed. and honest with the American people.

John   January 31st, 2008 10:20 pm ET

Americans dont care about Iraq. I think the economy and health care are bigger issues, and this is why clinton won.

Lee   January 31st, 2008 10:19 pm ET

Yeah it was high when they mentioned them being on the same ticket....but overall tonight the applause line was higher for clinton than obama about 95% of the time.
JSYK ;)
Hillary won hands down.

rok   January 31st, 2008 10:19 pm ET

Well Bill, you finally got something right.

K,FL   January 31st, 2008 10:19 pm ET

Like I said it will be a Clinton/Obama Ticket in 08 its our best shot to take the White House

tony   January 31st, 2008 10:19 pm ET

what about the possibility of an Edwards endorsement?

Bob G.   January 31st, 2008 10:19 pm ET

Bill – Finally you made some sense – it'll be hard to overtake Hillary. She did great tonight and I know I could support a Hillary/Obama ticket and then an Obama presidency 8 years from now!

Prayu   January 31st, 2008 10:19 pm ET

A note that Roland Martin brought up, was that Obama didn't go into the specifics of his plan enough; well tonight, he did hold his own with Hillary when it came to domestic policy.

However, when it came to questions of the Iraq war, of the ability to unite and lead and offer a fresh start? Obama was clearly stronger in those areas, and there are just some facts that Hillary could not shake off.

Jim ( Independent )   January 31st, 2008 10:19 pm ET

Clearly Obama's judgement shine over and above Clinton's , and it is also clear that he is much better at bringing people together to actually get something done in this country.

Obama will be the next President

James   January 31st, 2008 10:19 pm ET

Obama benefits by the people getting to know him. He is battling name recognition of Clinton.

The more exposure, the longer the voters take to decide, the more he rises.

The big question is:

I wonder if Obama will pick Hillary or Edwards for VP?

Derek, Jersey Shore   January 31st, 2008 10:19 pm ET

Thank you for being honest. Listening to CNN right now it sounds like the CNN personalities are trying to spin this as an Obama homerun. That is criminal.

LP   January 31st, 2008 10:18 pm ET

I do not care who was said this or that years ago – heck I was worried about wmd too – send people in to look and they did and bush went wild.
Iraq is not the only issue guys! there are so many other things that need looking out. Clinton is so much more well rounded than obama.
If all Obama has to face McCain with is the war – he will get crushed. McCain will chew him up and spit him out. Hillary can face all the other issues too and her Iraq thing was right at the time for what she voted for. read exaclty what she voted for before you go saying she wanted to go to war – she did not.

Hillary for President!

Hillary Fan   January 31st, 2008 10:18 pm ET

Go Hillary 2008!!!

David   January 31st, 2008 10:18 pm ET

I think today's debate will help Obama a lot. He is catching up clinton even in California.

Kate   January 31st, 2008 10:17 pm ET

None of my comments are being posted, but I'll try again. Bill, I think you are wrong that this was an unhelpful debate. I think it showed to all watching that the Democratic candidates are far superior to the Republican ones. This was a substantive, civil debate. That is an accomplishment! And whether or not there are differences in positions, we can choose between styles of leadership and effectiveness against Republicans in the fall. That is choice enough!

Ray   January 31st, 2008 10:16 pm ET

They both did good, But he just cant top Hillary!!!!

harley   January 31st, 2008 10:16 pm ET

This debate clearly shows Clinton to be the choice

joe   January 31st, 2008 10:15 pm ET

CNN must be deaf.

WE WANT SENATOR HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON FOR PRESIDENT!!!!!!!

Bill   January 31st, 2008 10:15 pm ET

If it was a draw, why go with the old?
I choose Obama

Asians for Hillary in Chicago   January 31st, 2008 10:14 pm ET

Hillary wins hands down. Obama stutters like crazy. This man doesn't have a sharp brain. His character is flaw. He didn't pay speeding ticket until he decided to run for pres. He snubed opponent. He receive money for his home from Rezko in exchange of recommend letter for Rezko to get government contract.
This guy is crooked. Please American people. Please don't vote for him.

melissa j.   January 31st, 2008 10:14 pm ET

I think Obama looked Presidential.

Great debate!

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room. Download this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

twitter
@wolfblitzercnn: Trifecta -- NOT. My Redskins, Bills and Packers all lose this weekend. Very sad.
Updated: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:40:09 -0800
@HornickCNN: RT @andersoncooper: Interactive: The top 10 Health-Care-Reform Players http://bit.ly/6C3OlX
Updated: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:47:50 -0800
@HornickCNN: RT @cnn_oppmann: CNN.com: Mexico City approves same-sex marriage. http://bit.ly/5RyMnk #mexico
Updated: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:46:26 -0800
@HornickCNN: Rudy's reportedly not running for NY SEN or Gov ...
Updated: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:43:48 -0800
@wolfblitzercnn: Redskins-Giants always exciting. Both teams have a lot to prove. And Giants can still salvage playoffs. Skins just need a win.
Updated: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:19:36 -0800
Categories
Powered by WordPress.com VIP