February 2, 2008
Posted: 07:07 PM ET
In a statement, Ethel Kennedy compares Obama to her late husband.
In a statement, Ethel Kennedy compares Obama to her late husband.

(CNN) – Ethel Kennedy, widow of Robert F. Kennedy, became the latest member of the high-profile clan to weigh in on the presidential race Saturday, announcing her support for Democrat Barack Obama.

In a statement released by the campaign, she compared Obama to her late husband. “Over these past few years, I’ve watched Sen. Obama inspire Americans from all walks of life to believe in real change and a new sense of hope and possibility. He’s a magnetic force, drawing the nation together for the common good and galvanizing us all to help shape our country’s future.

“Barack is so like Bobby, who struggled for the rights of the poor in the Mississippi Delta and Appalachia, traveled to California to stand in solidarity with Cesar Chavez and farm workers, and fought to end another war that cost so many lives.

“Today, we crave a leader with vision who can help us regain our lost humanity and rekindle our inherent generosity. With courage, caring, and charisma, Senator Obama is leading us toward a kinder, gentler world."

Obama said he was "humbled" to learn of Ethel Kennedy's decision.

This presidential campaign cycle has seen a split in the Kennedy family, many of whom generally avoid weighing in on political contests. Massachusetts Sen. Ted Kennedy, Rhode Island Rep. Patrick Kennedy and former First Daughter Caroline Kennedy all endorsed Obama at a campaign rally earlier this week, and are actively stumping for the Illinois senator. Ethel Kennedy's children Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Kathleen Kennedy Townsend have both publicly backed Hillary Clinton.

–CNN's Suzanne Malveaux and Matt Hoye contributed to this report

Filed under: Barack Obama


Anonymous   February 5th, 2008 10:26 am ET

Kennedys supporting Obama… does this sound change to you? This is sounds like "I am rubbing you back now" and "you later you do for me"…
Wake up people… do your homework… check the records… is public… this is not a ms/mr congeniality election… who is more likeable? Al Gore was boring… bla bla bla… and our country is now is this situation because most of the people wants a liakeable candidate… We have serious issues in this country to be resolved… When I choose a Surgeon ,I choose based on experience … I do not care if he/she is likeable enough….

david , atlanta   February 4th, 2008 5:08 pm ET

Has anyone stopped to wonder what the Kennedys stand to gain by having an Obama whitehouse. Considering the man is supposedly against the status quo, he keeps being seen with the most entrenched Washington insiders.

George Wu, A.I.A.   February 4th, 2008 8:37 am ET

But Janet, Hillary did not want a man and will not want one. She only wants to go to the White House!
If I spoke my mind openly all the way, my comment will not be posted!!!!!!!!!!!!!
dancewu(dot)net

AJ   February 4th, 2008 7:38 am ET

It's too bad the the Kennedys cant just disappear. They are a disgrace to America. And what exactly has Ethel Kennedy ever done for America? NOTHING like the rest of this do nothing family. What a disgrace to Bobby's name.

Murry   February 3rd, 2008 8:52 pm ET

Thank you, Ethel! You are awesome! We love you!
I'm a woman and I voted for Obama

Janet   February 3rd, 2008 8:12 pm ET

Bill was, notice I said was a great president, however its time for someone new to have a chance to run the country. Hillary needs to spend her time being a better wife. How can she run a country when she can't even control her husband. Its time for CHANGE

Tony   February 3rd, 2008 6:49 pm ET

To many endorsements and no substance in his message; that is the Obama Campaign in a nutshell. The Voters are not stupid. A clear message and experience not endorsements will determine the nominee.

votehillary2008   February 3rd, 2008 4:59 pm ET

This Kennedy endorsement thing is such a joke.

First, Carolina says Obama is like Jack. Then, RFK , Jr. & siblings say Hillary is like Bobby. Now, Ethel says Obama is like Bobby. So… that means Obama is like Jack and Bobby. Flashback to 1992, Jackie said Bill Clinton was like Jack.

Do they have some sort of family contest going? Who's most like my dad/husband? This family needs to move on, let their loved ones rest in peace and stop using them for political gain. Hillary is Hillary and Barack is Barack. There is no need for any comparisons.

Robert   February 3rd, 2008 4:53 pm ET

The liberal wing of the Democratic Party is determined to lose another election. The only Democrat to win the White House in the last 30 years was Clinton (who was in the progressive middle) and all the other candidates were judged too liberal to be President. We need to wise up and vote for the progressive middle again with Hillary.

jeannie   February 3rd, 2008 3:49 pm ET

I personally think President John F. Kennedy was a great president.
I would have loved the chance to vote for Robert Kennedy for President.
Finally, we have a candidate who is a lot like the Kennedy's…
people who did and do care about people.
The Clintons are status quo just like the Bush family…
IT IS TIME FOR CHANGE ……..I HOPE AND PRAY BARACK OBAMA WINS THE DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY AND THE PRESIDENCY.
IT IS TIME FOR A GOOD CHANGE ……..there is no better time than now.
NOW IS THE TIME

Harold Ballard   February 3rd, 2008 2:23 pm ET

Here the US goes again. Elect another inexperienced individual (Obama) to be President of the United States. Someone who does not tell you what he really stands for, who seems to be hiding his real intentions. How scary for us non-Americans!

Nancy   February 3rd, 2008 12:58 pm ET

BO has no substance. What has he really said. All he does is preach his messages as though your in church. He collects money like he is in sunday church. Is that what you want? Do you know what he actually stands for that isen't thought of by someone else first? Just the fact that some have mentioned "Camelot" sickens me. They are not the John Kennedy family and Michelle is not Jackie by far. We need to get out of this fantasy the news people have got us in. Please, we need to wake up and be smart before we screw up again.

Nancy   February 3rd, 2008 12:51 pm ET

BO has no substance. He has not decribed what he will do about anything. All he says is "I agree with……. on ……..". Has he thought about 'what' he would do besides have a whole bunch of people sitting around with cspan camera's on to show the WHOLE WORLD what our government is discussing. That will work. I'm sorry but without substance there is nothing. He may attract the young and first time voters that possibly haven't read up on all the candidates to decide or he has sucked them it by his constant preaching style of speech. Ask alot of questions and demand answers that actually say something.

Everett J. Roberts   February 3rd, 2008 12:49 pm ET

Has anyone noticed lately that CNN has become the Fox news network. I could care less about the Kennedy support for Obama. What concerns me is CNN's blatant outrightous support of OBama. I have voted Democrat for 50 yers and this will be the first year I will vote Republican. I don't trust Obama, read his church history. He is not the leader that Kennedy was regardless of what the Kennedy's say. They are trying to stand by the heritage of what President Kennedy and Senator Bob Kennedy gave this nation and set the stage for what is happening today. Obama is not a Jack Kennedy or Bob Kennedy, he is someone who has the sponsorship of Oprah. That is the Key. Will she be Vice President, I hope not.
As for CNN, todays show with Wolf Blitzer and the governor of AZ is an indication of exactly what is happening with this channel. One side of the story, did Wolf ask the tough questions - not on your life, only leading questions of the governor that would give her the chance to be another advocate for Obama. Where are the tough questions on him. No one is going to ask because of the race card and they are afraid to stand up and ask the questions. The race card is the factor that has turned this all around and unfortunately it is not O'Reilly, Scarborough, Russ or others leading the way but the supposedly neutral TV and Radio channels who have decided Obama is the man. Why was no one on the other side today that supported Clinton. CNN has lost another listener and will watch FOX as at least I know which side they truly are on for news only.

Sadou Brrown   February 3rd, 2008 12:37 pm ET

My My, Can't we all just get along. I was first a supporter of Hillary until I did my research. There is no one more appropriate for this job than Barack Obama. Look at his past. The integrity and commitment he has shown to helping those with less has been unparalleled. I want a president that embodies leadership, integrity, and humanity. Not one that says they want change, but really seems to want more of "What Was". It is finally time for this great country to become ONE NATION, UNDER GOD, INDIVISISIBLE, and WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL……….

Tom   February 3rd, 2008 12:37 pm ET

The Kennedy endorsements will hurt Obama. Remember, the Kennedys don't own this country, the American people. do.

KEREL   February 3rd, 2008 12:36 pm ET

CRITICAL!

We are at a critical time in our nation! We desperately need a LEADER.!!! Barack Obama embodies what America has come to be. Being bi-racial, and growing up in another country gives him a mulitcultural perspective that cannot be taught. The Kennedys are backing him because he is a student of superb LEADERS, such as J.F.K. and Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

NOTHING against Senator Clinton, but when it comes to leadership abilities, there is no comparison between her and Senator Obama. Our Country is in a time in crisis - war, healthcare, poverty, education, etc. We need somebody that embodies CHANGE!!!

OBAMA 08

TCRNYL, NY, NY   February 3rd, 2008 12:36 pm ET

The tide has turned in favor of Barack Obama.

Go, Barack. Go USA — into the 21st Century.

Kudos to Ethel and Ted — members of an older generation, but with the vision to see the future. Kudos to Caroline, my contemporary, who heard what her kids had to say, and listened.

As I watched Obama's speech at the 2004 Democratic Convention, I turned to my husband and said, "That's the first African-American President; he's another Robert Kennedy."

And he is.

Paul Williamson   February 3rd, 2008 12:30 pm ET

Democrats are at it again… what short memories they have. Obama is just like McGovern, far left (100% ADA rating), inspirational speaker, ya ya ya…even supported by Ted Kennedy, just like Mcgovern against Nixon… and he will be slaughtered against the Republican nominee, whether he be mcCain or Romney, because he is not in the center of American politics-he is scary and will not get elected. How can he be a unifier being so far to the left?. Hillary has a much more central position and can beat tthe Republican nominee.
My wife and I have voted for Democratic nominees since Stevenson and we know what will happen. For the last 40 years, we have only had two Democrat presidents (since Johnson), Clinton and Carter… it is VERY hard to elect a Democrat and they must be centrist.. look at Stevenson, McGovern, Humphrey, Kerry -all very liberal and all LOSERS. Add Obama to that list if he is the nominee, and prepare for 8 more years of a Republican presidency.we will vote for the Republican candidate over Obama, and we are hardly conservative.

Howard   February 3rd, 2008 12:30 pm ET

Perhaps Ethle Kennedy should ask Hilary's campaign to "stop running" the TV ads with her late husband's photos taken from RFK's 1968 campaign.
Obama has the best chance of winning the Presidency and uniting our nation as he can reach out to independent voters and even some Republicans.
Hilary Clinton is simply "too polarizing"… she will help re-unite Republicans. It's time for a "real change"!
Obama like both JFK and RFK can bring out lots of new "younger voters" and others that have simply been disaffected. Hilary will not be able to do so.
This is evidenced in the latest polls which show McCain beating Hilary but losing to Obama.
The right wing "hate machine" wants to run against Hilary. Democrats, it's time for "new leadership"!

OBAMA!

Jeri   February 3rd, 2008 12:20 pm ET

How interesting to view these comments and read of the differences.

Kennedy's supporting Obama ……..we cannot recreate the 50's. That time is gone!
Calling Barak a 'prince' is simplistic and childish…bringing up Camelot is worse.
What on earth is that about. ????

This time is not to look for hope……hope will come will change….but not the superficial change that comes with the rhetoric of Barak speeches.

He's been talking the same game since the 2004 Democratic Convention…….in 4 years this is still his 'mantra'. There is no substance to his words. Barak has the audacity to think he can change what…….do we really know ????
The government policies….the congress …who…..what ???????

He also has the audacity do think he has the ability to bring 'hope'. He does not have the gumption nor the deep conviction to fight for what is right if the fight is too big. Barak has made it this far by 'insipid phrasing' …..knowing so much of our country is looking for a lack of a better word…a'savior .' Barak has the ability to at least make people believe that he can make them feel better with this words. But they are only words. He will never achieve the power to accomplish what he has seemingly commited himself to do. He seems almost delusional….and full of himself. The more I see him …the more I see this.

I can almost guarantee ….Barck is not the person for the job of Commander in Chief…..he's not been tested nor as he shown that he is up to the tough challenge of doing all that it will take to make the significant effort for any type of change for the better.

So far he's been given a free ride because he is good with 'words' and projecting these …..many smart people have been fooled for forever and will it continue when .things are marketed and packaged well.

We can not afford to be sold…….we need to think of our future
We cannot be fooled by 'gimmicks' . We need to think of our future in terms of achieving solutions to many problems facing our nation…….we need to listen and make opions based on answers given on the tough questions.
Rhetorical speeches are empty speeches.

Barak has managed to sell this idea of hope and change to the young generation because he seems to be part of them……but these young people also need to see beyond this and think about whether he can actually deliver.
It's my opinion the young generation hopes will be shattered when if it comes to B.O. failing at taking charge of our nation.
To me it's a more than scarry ……its a recipe for disater.

Gayle   February 3rd, 2008 12:18 pm ET

Thank you Ethel, we love you!

ww-New York   February 3rd, 2008 12:15 pm ET

This just shows that more and more people want change! perhaps some of these more senior DEMS know that the Clinton's won't change. Perhaps they're listening to Americas cry for change.

Alecki   February 3rd, 2008 12:12 pm ET

Oprah and Snoop Dog should not determine who should be president!

Jessica Price, California   February 3rd, 2008 12:09 pm ET

Go Hilary!

Mary   February 3rd, 2008 12:07 pm ET

Looks like Kennedy wants to be vice president…he will do anything to get there…was afraid to go for president with his background…

reality MN   February 3rd, 2008 12:06 pm ET

not apart of the status quo?–are you kidding Obama?–this is the definition of the status quo–the Kennedy family endorsement and their perpetual wealth. Obama is a part of the machine, just like Clinton. I prefer the experienced one (Clinton) this time around–our country needs this after 8 years of neo-con/Bush policy. Be careful dems, the right loves our implosions–to make Clinton evil, Obama beautiful is another 'Nadar' waiting in the wings….sometimes we never learn.

Ginny CA   February 3rd, 2008 12:05 pm ET

KB26: Have you been to a Hillary rally? I have. I was at her rally in San Jose, CA, a couple of days ago. Thousands of supporters were there shouting "Yes We Can!" in English and in Spanish. I don't know what you are implying with "Yes She Can". I think they are the same. Either way the sentiment is: "Hillary Can Win" or "Hillary Can Lead Our Nation". Not much difference that I can see.

Ellie, OR   February 3rd, 2008 12:00 pm ET

Poor Ethel. She's been out of the picture so long and must be at least 110 by now. I wonder if she's done any research of her own before following her brother-in-law's instructions. Obviously 3 of her kids did their homework and are firmly committed to Hillary.

H   February 3rd, 2008 11:57 am ET

Both sides are nasty. One more than the other. Look at the over all picture. There is so much hate between the two sides of the Democratic Party that I do not believe either will prevail. I have my oown personal view as who start all this but I will keep it to myself for fear of the hate groups.

pops   February 3rd, 2008 11:54 am ET

HOORRAAYY FOR RICARDO. YOUR'RE ONE OF THE BEST. TELL THEM. REMIND THESE EDUCATED NIT WITS OF THE KENNEDY SACRIFICES FOR AMERICA. THEY DID SOMETHING FOR ME. THE CLINTONS NEVER DID. THANK YOU TED KENNEDY. AMERICA SAYS OBAMA 08.

Alejandra   February 3rd, 2008 11:53 am ET

Not all CA is for Billiary! Not all Latinas are for Hilliary! Not all people are ready to endure more controvery over who is automatically the heir to the throne in the Oval Office! My family, My church, my school, and my heart will vote for Obama in 2008!

Persaud   February 3rd, 2008 10:14 am ET

Read the history about the Kennedys and then tell he if you guys want OBAMA as your LEADER. I live in Canada Now but all this stuff about the kennedy want me and my friends come and vote for Hillary and it about 599 of us and still growing
so go Hillary. I am not saying Obama is a bad guy.

Make history   February 3rd, 2008 9:28 am ET

We needs somebody in the White House who is not a technocrate/bureaucrate like, not a pragamatic politician, Barak is in it for the task, he embodies the brilliance of a leader. Clinton is not a leader, none is but BARACK

Thomas   February 3rd, 2008 9:24 am ET

If Hillary wins the Democratic Nomination i vote Republican. She is too divisive. She also would not aid the Democratic ticket by being placed as a vice presidential candidate. Sorry Hillary don't cry.
Go Obama / Edwards !!!!!

KB26   February 3rd, 2008 9:14 am ET

At Hillary's rally. they say Yes she can. At Obama's rally , they Yes We can. What a difference.

Ralph   February 3rd, 2008 9:10 am ET

So much for the promise of "change" in Washington. We now see that Obama is just like the rest of the wealthy, politicians entrenched in the political sewage in Washington. Don't expect anything other than the same old politics if Obama is elected, he is beholden to the Kennedys and wealth. His hand is out to all the wrong people also, Rezko.

average JOe   February 3rd, 2008 8:51 am ET

Ted Kennedy , royalty , you've got to be kidding me. Where have you been. If he was an average American he would probably have spent some time in prison. You can't deny that Hillary has worked hard all her life to help people. Obama, I like him but he isn't ready yet. Maybe next time. And guess what? I'm just a little person who doesn't need Guilini, Kennedy Opra, Bill or anyone else to tell me how to vote. I am informed–Iam for Hillary. You might like to be told–but not me.

SecondSage   February 3rd, 2008 8:46 am ET

wait till the story of Susan Eisenhower, President Eisenhowers Granddaughter comes out.

A life long Republican backing Obama.

Ed,Ellenville,New York   February 3rd, 2008 8:42 am ET

These Obama posts are by and large the most divisive. The one by the Obaman stating Hillary supporters are divisive is very funny. Sure, the sky is green. The earth is flat. Bush is a uniter. Good luck with that.

Chyke   February 3rd, 2008 8:30 am ET

Keep them coming!!! Congratulations President Obama!!

Joe-Wilmington, DE   February 3rd, 2008 8:28 am ET

Will Slick Willy have disparaging comments about Ethel Kennedy like he did for Sen. Ted?

Please, NO MORE CLINTONS; NO MORE BUSHES.

d   February 3rd, 2008 8:08 am ET

who cares about Ethel…

Lisa Salt Lake City, Utah   February 3rd, 2008 8:03 am ET

Hillary's health care plan - tax everyone to subsidize the health care for those who don't have it. If I pay for my own health care plan through work, I will also be paying through my taxes for Hillary's gift of health care for everyone who doesn't have health care.

She says that this benefit would be greatly subsidized by the "government" (which mean us the taxpayers). So you are paying through your taxes, and again based upon your salary "your premium" for your insurance.

Hillary takes credit for her present to us–which we are paying for.

Texas Democrat   February 3rd, 2008 7:08 am ET

How is Obama about change when that is all he does is invoke names of the past and his endorsers are nothing but the past? I have learned more history from Obama this last month than my whole primary and secondary education span combined!

Don't his endorsers from Washington realize that Obama is insulting them when he insults the ways of Washington? The whole message is so inconsistent!

He says he is about unity and he has managed to divide gender, race, political parties, and he has even managed to split the Kennedy’s! The most Democratic Family of all! He is on a bigger roll than Bush! Obama has accomplished in one month what has taken Bush 7 ½ years to accomplish! Real “amazing” alright!

Obama=The Permanent Divide

Democrat219   February 3rd, 2008 7:02 am ET

Obama is for real change? He is 'an outsider' willing to work with the other side? He is going to bring ALL people together - black, white, asian, latino? Here is a very telling quote: the candidate said, "I talk about a larger goal, which is to call upon the best of America. It's part of the renewal. Part of the renewal is a set of high standards and to remind people that the greatness of America really does depend on neighbors helping neighbors… and…I'm very worried about…the kid who just wonders whether America is meant for him. I really worry about that….people sense my heart, know my sense of optimism and know where I want to lead the country…I've got a great sense of where I want to lead…" — Interview with the Washington Post, March 23, 2000 by George W. Bush.

ANYONE can say they are for change. Hillary has shown it for years and has definitive policies to get us there. Hardworking and tough as nails…

Adam, LV, NV   February 3rd, 2008 6:47 am ET

No, truth is we are not a "United" party. And sorry all you Obama supporters, he won't change that. A lot of Democrats are still put off by that word.

Anyone remember what the last "Uniter", "Doer", and "Decider" (not to mention the whole Hope, Change, etc he babbled about as well) who had no experience did? If not, look at what everyone is saying on the stump, usually the first words: "President Bush's days are almost over"…

At least I was not naive enough to drink the change kool-aid the last time around. I voted for Gore and I voted for Kerry. I've seen what a "Uniter" does to the country. And I am ashamed that the people of this country were actually gullable enough to fall for it…

It's our DIFFERENCES that make us STRONG! It's our DIFFERENCES that get things done. If everyone was united and all thought the same, no new ideas would come about. It's what makes us look in the mirror everyday and say "How can I make a difference". Deviceivness is what BRINGS about change.

charlotte   February 3rd, 2008 6:08 am ET

I'm not a Kennedy but I endorse Hillary. I know the Kennedys have more clout then me however, they are each just one vote. I think so far we are tied at three and three.

shaun   February 3rd, 2008 5:39 am ET

Hillary's been attacked by the Republicans for soo many years…THEREFORE she can work across the aisle with Republicans.

Anyone else confused by this??

OBAMA 08

Ken   February 3rd, 2008 5:36 am ET

Wow, nice to see another endorsement for Obama.
I'm so glad my parents and all 5 of my siblings are going for Obama. The more I learn about Hillary, the more disturbed I am. Sadly, I used to respect the Clintons lot too, but I learned my lesson.

Eli, Milwaukee   February 3rd, 2008 5:36 am ET

And by the way. Clinton could very well lose to McCain in a election. No chance for McCain to win against Obama.

OBAMA '08

Eli, Milwaukee   February 3rd, 2008 5:20 am ET

Doris, Ethel is not intelligent just because she backs Obama? Are you saying she has become dumb overnight?
Just tell me how do Hillary health care plan helps the poor if they cant afford it?
What I see is mandated money for the pharmaceutical companies. Can anyone say lobbyist in the mist?

GRACE, SUN CITY CENTER, FL   February 3rd, 2008 5:17 am ET

GOOD!! I VOTED FOR RON PAUL IN THE PRIMARY.
BUT OBAMA WOULD BE MY SECOND CHOICE.
THE WAR ISSUE IS CRITICAL TO EVERY OTHER
ISSUE BECAUSE OF THE MONETARY AND MILITARY
COSTS IN DOLLARS AND LIVES.

john   February 3rd, 2008 5:11 am ET

I hear Hustler Magazine has endorsed McCain

Fernando   February 3rd, 2008 5:11 am ET

Record breaking turnouts! It's not because of Hillary, sorry! Obama will be the next President of the U.S.A.. I wouldn't be surprised that on Monday the day before Super Tuesday Edwards endorses Obama. Edwards wants change also and that would be a very big blow to the Clintons. The Clintons are backed by the corporations, but Obama is backed by the people! We the voters decide.

amazed   February 3rd, 2008 5:05 am ET

Talk about playing both sides! Actually, who cares what Kennedys think, though you have to give them credit, they know how to play the game. (whats next)? Kennedy's maid supports Clinton, but the butler supports Obama? HAHAHA Wake up people….either way they get a piece of the winner.

Ricardo   February 3rd, 2008 5:02 am ET

Hillary cannot run a decent campaign, how will she run the country? For all those voting with their female organs, just get this, most prominent American females are voting OBAMA, And just in case you cannot see it, SHE NEEDS A MAN, to get her into the White House and a pretty woeful man at best! What does Hillray's surrogate in chief think about women? Lewensky, Flowers, Jones etc may have something to say about that! But then all the feminists never considered those very wronged sisters as kin!

The Clintons and their cronies in the White house? Phuleeez!!!! As for disrespecting the Kennedys, know that none ever faced impeachment, lied under oath or disbarred from practicing in their own state. How do you want a man in the White House who cannot practice law in his own state of Arkansas? Do not delude yourselves that it is all about Hillary. You know she is squat without Bill. Just look at the campaign trail.

The Kennedy family sacrificed two of their own for a better America. What has the Clintons done for America apart from lining their owm pockets with funds from very dubious sources? $100 million from outside sources and nice guys like P Paul. Your heritage is already mortgaged, they need to get in for you to start paying the interests.

Vote with your heads and not genitalia!!! Enough already!!!

For Authenticity & Real Ability   February 3rd, 2008 5:01 am ET

Putting aside all of the feel good endorsements which are wonderful and speak to just how great Barack is….there is no denying how brilliant he is. he's incredibly real and authentic. People like him don't come around often. For all those who don't get it, go read about him, read his book The Audacity of Hope, check out his policies on his website, watch his Google interview and others on youtube, and finally, don't ignore this incredible opportunity! Barack Obama!

Big   February 3rd, 2008 4:45 am ET

may be if we put a clinton in office may bill want cheat on her

gina   February 3rd, 2008 4:44 am ET

How can one vote again for the Clintons. 10 years is moe then enough! How not to soo that all they do is essentially for themselves and for their own greediness for power?

Alison, FL   February 3rd, 2008 4:43 am ET

When all of you HIllary supporters are forced to purchase healthcare and forced to have microchips inserted in your arms for monitoring, then don't come complaining to the rest of us who actually have brains! Can't you see in her eyes the greed for power? Does it not scare you just a bit that her and her husband want to be back in the White House so bad? THINK

jon   February 3rd, 2008 4:41 am ET

Dear Doris, how is MANDATED health care a better health care policy? If I make $30,000 and am in generally good health, shouldn't it be up to me to take the risk of not having insurance? Especially when I can use that money to better provide for my family, my children. MANDATED health care has insurance companies drooling at the incredible profits they will make at the citizens' expense. And do you think the quality of care will improve under such a system? Look at Canada, England, etc. Due to the bureaucracy comes with universal, state-supported health care, it can take years to get treated for a life-threatening disease!

Chuck Rhodes   February 3rd, 2008 4:38 am ET

As Hillary slips in the polls, her supporters quickly turn nasty.Oops, just like Bill and Hillary. Their true colors come out when pushed to the wall. They can't stand it when they are not in the spotlight.

As a feminist, I fought with women for years for them to be identified by their own accomplishments rather than their husbands. And now the great Hillary's biggest claim is her experience as FIRST LADY. 'Cuse me but that is not the battle that true feminist fought.

Don't get me wrong I have supported BIll since he ran in 1992 but their evil side has really come out during the past few weeks.

And don't think for one moment that IF she gets the nomination, their behavior will be poor kindle for the GOP. The Democrats may blow this chance to regain the White House if we nominate Hillary. She has a dirty dirty record.

Wade San Diego   February 3rd, 2008 4:32 am ET

I'm excited and super proud of the amount of blogging and commenting that goes on on here. I was surprised however that most of the Hillary Supporters on here continue to show incredible divisiveness. Aren't we a Democratic Party? Why do we do the attacks and negative campaigning on each other. Isn't it really all about our Party joining together and fighting the fight.

Obviously, I support Barack Obama. I originally supported Hillary early on, until I found out more about Obama. Not to say that Hillary isn't a great candidate, it's just I'm excited and feel that there is a chance to change things to a different tone in Washington.

Hillary is a great candidate, I don't and will not speak ill of her. I know she would be a great President. I just feel like taking the chance to hope for something new.

I hope and pray that we all discontinue all the bickering here in these rooms. Support your candidate, love your candidate, be excited about them too. But don't use divisive language that just tears us apart.

A UNIFIED DEMOCRATIC PARTY!!!!

That's what we need to be whoever should win the nomination.

Stop playing Republican political tactics and attacking your fellow Democrats.

"there is not a red America or a blue America there is the United States of America." - Barack Obama.

Democrats start being American and be excited and inspired, but don't be negative and attacking. We are above that.

The observer   February 3rd, 2008 4:24 am ET

La Opinion to endorse Barack Obama

Doris Bianchi   February 3rd, 2008 4:05 am ET

I was surprised to hear that Ethel Kennedy endorsed Obama.I have always had the impression Ethel Kennedy was of the highest intelligence, but I was wrong. Following the debates, it is clear Hillary Clinton has a much better health care policy, immigration control and ideas on how to implement and correct the problems concerning the illegals already here. She is definetly the most experienced in all areas. She has our entire families votes.
Obama is good and has good ideas, but he just does not have the "Give em hell ",ability Hillary has. She's got the "BEEN THERE-DONE THAT experience
Obama ought to give the "dream team" considerable thought, (Clinton/Obama)and be ready for the next four years.

kevin from alaska   February 3rd, 2008 4:04 am ET

On the NYTimes article about Obama…. let's not forget who they endorsed last week. And let's also mention HRC was one of the first backers of Obama's bill.

Andy, New York, New York   February 3rd, 2008 3:58 am ET

I want you Hillary nutheads to see one thing:

These people coming out in droves for Obama is really an anti-Hillary tsunami!

observer#1   February 3rd, 2008 2:45 am ET

This represents change? Another way for the Kennedy family to try to have some one "owe" them. The older Kennedys have had a blemished history since we have seen their name. What are they up to now???

michelle t   February 3rd, 2008 2:16 am ET

why would you leave such a racist comment are you low on hope or love come to obama.com we will fill you up with both yes we can

Michael Katz   February 3rd, 2008 2:04 am ET

actually, they made their fortune bootleging alcohol during the 20's when it was illegal.

Jon Cruz   February 3rd, 2008 12:02 am ET

This is ridiculous. I agree, Ted Kennedy's endorsement is a big deal. But Ethel? The pro-Obama wave on here is ridiculous. You still aren't featuring the NY Times.

ramsfire   February 2nd, 2008 11:00 pm ET

Would love to see your sources on the above statement……….that is unless you are part of the Disinformation/Misinformation/MATRIX that runs rampant under the Bush/Cheney/Rovian NAZI REGIME. My research shows that Joseph P. Kennedy had "Alcohol-Related" Enterprises that accounted for the Family's Wealth, with nary a Black OR a Jew to be found laboring in their "Fields". Time for a REGIME CHANGE………by any means necessary.

Terri Gilmanton NH   February 2nd, 2008 10:49 pm ET

I love the Kennedys BUT I am votiing for Senator Clinton. Go Hillary—Teddy you will be happy with Hillary in the White House!

Sam   February 2nd, 2008 10:49 pm ET

Joelle needs to take off the white cape. YES WE CAN!

john17   February 2nd, 2008 10:49 pm ET

noone cares

Livia   February 2nd, 2008 10:48 pm ET

Hillary 2008!!!!!

vigna   February 2nd, 2008 10:35 pm ET

Here You Go !!!!!!

Sen. Ted Kennedy couldn’t attract Latinos vote for Obama
He try to bring some more votes from his family members
Best of luck Mr Senator for 2012

Hillary Clinton next President of Untied States of America

HH   February 2nd, 2008 8:18 pm ET

This is amazing, the Kennedy’s family and Clintons are friends but to come out and endorse some one whom nobody knew before 2004 is testimony to Barack’s greatness.

Obama gives me goose-bumps every time I hear him speak.

He is intelligent, decent, inclusive, and man of integrity.

Obama is true leader and that is what we need today.

Joelle, Milwaukee, WI   February 2nd, 2008 8:15 pm ET

The Kennedy clan has a long and very troubled history here in America, having made there fortunes on the back of the labor of Blacks and Jews; it is interesting at the very least, that they still want to own one…

independent for Obama   February 2nd, 2008 8:08 pm ET

I am glad our American royalty, the Kennedy's, are making their voices heard for Obama. These people are on America's side! They always have been. Look at all this family has sacrificed for our nation. Two revolutionary forces that stirred up our nation for righteousness and civil rights, John F. Kennedy and Robert F. Kennedy. Thank goodness their voices are still heard in the voices of their children and family!

Lets deliver Obama to the World   February 2nd, 2008 8:03 pm ET

Mama knows best!

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room. Download this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

Follow us on Twitter

CNN on TwitterGet Ticker updates the moment they appear online via the Web, SMS, or instant messages.
Follow politicalticker

Categories
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNN makes reasonable efforts to review all comments prior to posting and CNN may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2008 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com