February 3, 2008
Posted: 03:00 PM ET
 Obama defended his record on a nuclear leak bill in the Senate.
Obama defended his record on a nuclear leak bill in the Senate.

(CNN) — On the final weekend before Super Tuesday, Sen. Barack Obama's presidential campaign quickly responded to a New York Times article Sunday scrutinizing the senator's actions on a nuclear leak bill. The story, published on the front page, said "a close look at the path his legislation took tells a different story" from what Obama has said.

Obama's campaign posted on its Web site a lengthy "fact check" about the article defending the senator's work on the bill.

Two years ago, after Illinois residents learned that Exelon Corporation did not disclose leaks at one of its plants, Obama introduced the Nuclear Release Notice Act of 2006, which would require plant owners to report all leaks to state and local authorities, the article reported.

Obama has touted the bill — which never passed the Senate — on the campaign trail, and in December he told voters in Iowa it was "the only nuclear legislation that I've passed," the newspaper reported.

Although it passed the environmental committee, the bill never made to the full Senate, and the senator reintroduced it last fall, according to the report.

The article said the Obama camp did not explain to the newspaper why Obama told Iowa voters that the bill had passed.

The article also said Obama bowed to pressure from Senate Republicans, Exelon and nuclear regulators, and rewrote the bill to "reflect changes" they wanted.

"The new bill removed language mandating prompt reporting and simply offered guidance to regulators," the story said.

In its "fact check," the Obama campaign said the revised bill still required notification of leaks and that "the only change was that the requirements would be made through the regulatory process."

The "fact check" also said Obama had "criticized the industry's voluntary guidelines and vowed to press ahead with the bill after those guidelines were announced."

The "fact check" did not address Obama's remark about the bill having "passed." It also did not respond to the article's reporting that Exelon executives and employees have contributed $227,000 to Obama's campaign.

David Axelrod, Obama's chief political strategist, has worked as a consultant for the Illinois-based company, the newspaper reported.

"Obama 'never discussed this issue or this bill' with Mr. Axelrod," the article said, citing Obama's campaign.

Obama is locked in a tight race for the Democratic nomination against Sen. Hillary Clinton of New York.

Filed under: Barack Obama


maryblu   February 6th, 2008 11:11 am ET

It's a shame that so many people still want the OLD way of running our government with lobbyists and crooked politicians at the helm. Our children and grandchildren deserve something better. WE deserve something better! Hill and Bill represent all that is wrong with our government.

You can argue all you want about who has the most experience but you know that both are near equal in ELECTED experience. One of them votes according to the staus quo, and one is not afraid to say no. The question is though, who has the best experience to meet our needs, the needs of the people?

The one who sat on corporate boards, and/or sat on boards to help others by gathering information, or the person who was out on the street working along side people of all races and genders and helping them to get jobs and health care, food and shelter?

Who will be better able to sit down with the medical and insurance groups to improve health care at affordable costs for everyone? The one who has gotten hundreds of thousands of dollars in contributions from them or the one who will sit down with them and wants to work out a plan that is fair to them as well as US?

Who is better to restore our reputation in the world? The one who's husband takes money for favors and the one who won't meet and talk face to face with our advisaries? The one who has taken a jet and visited other countries and shook a few hands? Or the one who will meet our advisaries and talk to them face to face and see if we can find common ground and who has lived amoung people of the world and gotten to know them?

Think well what kind of governmenr you want.
Think well what kind fo world you want to leave your children and grandchildren.

Real change can be frightening. Will you be voting with wisdom or fear of real change? The only way to conqueor fear is to face it. How brave are you?

John   February 6th, 2008 5:31 am ET

Obama Rocks!!!
It's Hillary who avoids giving direct answers, when she's asked crucial questions such as : how are you gonna make the your healthcare plan mandatory? are you gonan impose penalties?….guys she does not asnwer this question no matter how many time people ask her the same thing…but obama on the other hand gives a more practical answer to the health care problem by saying that it'll be made more affordable…..and this article on NY times is just a weak effort to tarnish Sen Obama's image which is now far more superior to that of Hillary, he's a leader that people can look up to…
OBAMA OBAMA OBAMA OBAMA……..

Jim673   February 4th, 2008 3:29 pm ET

Obama!… how do you spell that?…. 'H'….The democrates version of….'W'…..No not another loser… Please No!…Has anyone checked this guys background? How could the DNC put this guy forward? And how could he possibly be where he's at? The democratic voters must be as stupid as the GOP believes them to be. But why did the DNC let him run in the first place? Doesn't everyone know that if he is our pick another republican presidant will take office. Can you say.. four… more.. years?!!!

Charles Stoy   February 4th, 2008 12:49 pm ET

Cari,

The New York Times is no longer a respected International news source. It is now the third largest circulating paper in New York city with a TOTAL (National as well as International) of just over 200,000.

It is now just a Manhatten paper.

PW   February 4th, 2008 11:56 am ET

I hope he's asked about it during Situation Room today.

And if he answers, this just more of the same old politics, then I'm thinking how much Barack before we get a specific straight answer.

–philip

Saffea   February 4th, 2008 11:13 am ET

You can never gun a good man down. Obama will definitely get over this in grand style and go on to win the primaries.
SM.

sunlight   February 4th, 2008 10:48 am ET

nOW children reread the article. It is the New York Times for god sake. They are about as credible as a 3.00 bill. That newspaper is full of phonies, fakes, and wantabes. They are so terrified their sorry newspaper will have to pay more taxes to h elp the poor. Wait until the new york times see what hillbill is going to do with them.

When you have a weak infrastructure as the New York times, you will post almost anything to get some sales.

Truth be Known

Peter Cananda 4 Obama!   February 4th, 2008 10:39 am ET

Please read it carefully Obama actually faught for us. Obama is not directly in possection of the money contributed to his camp and if that is true that Exelon contributed to his camp, he will refund it. He get over $32, million , what is $227,000.
The camp will donate that money to charity if it is true they have it.
He didn't do anything wrong, Obama has said that he is against lobbiest and specail interest .
So, any company or lobbiest who want to contribute to someone who doesn't like them so be it. They are wasting their money, those money will be redonated to charities across the conntry and the can't control his White House.

Vote Obama

Peter 4 Obama!   February 4th, 2008 10:26 am ET

Are you guys serious? He actually challenged the oil company to disclose any spilling, that to me is fighting for the people. which language don't you understand.
How is it true that someone who took money from Exelon will fight against Exelon?
You figure!

Hillary health care plan will force everyone to have her plan, which I see disturbing. American should choose whatever health care they like purchase, not some president who will take your right from you to force you.
No to Hillary health care plan and say yes to Obama health care plan.
Obama plan will not force you to take his plan, but will help you reduce your cost if you already have one, but for those who don't have he will purchase at a lower cost for them. How better is that? Let NO President take your FREEDOM aways and force you in getting what you can't afford.

Obama will give student's $4,000.00 every year. Ist that good enough? Tell me which President will do that? Let us vote for change and turn our back on the old politice. We have had enough of Clinton and Bush. They have nothing left for us. Can't you SEE!!
Obama 08!

jason   February 4th, 2008 10:22 am ET

It's odd how people latch on to one article or one piece of information and allow that fragment of detail to completely steer one's outlook. It's frightening that you allow yourselves to be so easily manipulated. Every single one of the candidates has either directly or indirectly misled americans on his or her record & on his or her opponents record. Each one of them has lied, deceived americans to some degree, and inflated their own records in the pursuit of the presidency. Our votes or reasons for, should be more fundamental. Of the candidates who are remaining, please vote for whomever you feel will be the best leader.

Mike in Kentucky   February 4th, 2008 10:18 am ET

This is the New York Times…yes the Editorial Board endorsed Hillary Clinton, but…

Now, imagine the Republican attack machine…other skeletons are waiting to clatter: and they already know about them.

Can we as Democrats really take the "leap of faith"?

We know more about the Clintons, thanks to the Republican right, than we care to know, but we know nothing about Obama.

;-) "dem bones, dem bones, dem bones"

It looks like we are about to learn more.

You decide.

Michiel   February 4th, 2008 10:09 am ET

I've been trying to post for 2 days, nothing shows! What gives?

Mike in Kentucky   February 4th, 2008 9:29 am ET

As I have observed many times on these posts, we all have skeletons in the closet…

I think I might be hearing bones clattering at the Obama camp!

josh   February 4th, 2008 9:15 am ET

finally you get to see the real bama a liar…………..hillary 08

holly   February 4th, 2008 8:56 am ET

WAKE UP!!! Hillary is the one with Bad judgment. She voted for the war and cannot worm her way out of it. Bad Judgment!

Universal Health care..to FORCE people to get health insurance. Dictatorship.

Vincent   February 4th, 2008 8:32 am ET

Why has noone talked about his church and the pastor..Research!!!!!!!!!!!!tucc.org.
Wright wrote that the 9/11 terrorist attack upon our nation was a "wake-up call" to White America," reminding it that "people of color had not gone away, faded into the woodwork or just disappeared, as the Great White West went on its merry way of ignoring Black concerns."
WAKE UP PEOPLE!!!!

Sara   February 4th, 2008 8:21 am ET

Hopefully this will be on the news today, made me rethink my vote

kathy   February 4th, 2008 8:16 am ET

I'm just wondering how we can get so caught up in it all. Obama is the change guy right. But it seem to me that with all this we are saying he's just another of the same. Just because his skin is a different color he feels he is somhow different! If we want different then the real change would be Clinton. A man is a man is a man.
If we want someone who has a different way of thinking we need to look at the woman. We all know about the vast differance between the two.

Alecki   February 4th, 2008 8:12 am ET

Why isn't this nuclear waste article from the NY Times being slammed on CNN

Jen   February 4th, 2008 8:02 am ET

Obama's work in the senate is questionable. Why risking make this man US president???
Hillary is the well rounded, best qualified, most presidential candidate who will win Super Tuesday HUGE.
And poof! Obama disappears!

Persaud   February 4th, 2008 7:48 am ET

Obama, Oprah, Shriver, and the Kennedys they all in the same. They all lie to get vote and money, they say Obama is the next KENNEDY and they are right people lie lie, let see if CNN will run this one I gest NOT.

But if it was Clinton it will be on the air every hour shame on the Obama . and the rest of you

AJ   February 4th, 2008 7:23 am ET

More lies from Obama. He has a hard time running on his record because the only record he has is to vote "Present"

hati   February 4th, 2008 6:59 am ET

I wonder if Obama can really do the job. I haven't heard about him except when he was asked to do a speech during John Kerry. One political speech is not enough to get elected . Maybe, he can join Oprah and Dr. Phil in a new TV show. Let us see, who is a better speaker .This is a very important election where our economy is at stake. If he will be the candidate, i will be a Republican in a heartbeat.

maryblu   February 4th, 2008 6:23 am ET

I will never trust Hillary as president or as a woman. She carries too much dirt and many secrets. She doesn't mind the lobbiests in Washington, after all they have suported her. When she ran for NYS Senator she recieved high contributions from defense contractors and the health care industry. She is the first New Yorker to sit on the Senate Armed Services Committeeon. Now I have to ask myself,

1. How much did that effect her vote to go to war with Iraq?
2. How will this effect bringing our boys home?
3. How will that effect how we conduct ourselves in Afganistan?
4. How can she effectively work with health care to bring medical costs down?

At the time she accpeted these contributions, Frederick H. Graefe, a health care lawyer and lobbyist in Washington for more than 20 years, said, “People in many industries, including health care, are contributing to Senator Clinton today because they fully expect she will be the Democratic presidential nominee in 2008.”

One had washes the other as they say.

She still can't admit she made a mistake voting to go to war.
She has pitted one minority group against another. The old man establishment needs this to keep the status quo. Keep the underdogs fighting so they can't see what we are doing. Toss them a bone here and there and they won't take away from our feasts.

The Observer   February 4th, 2008 6:04 am ET

The man is a liar of the first degree – he has all the qualities of a used-car salesman.

Luis   February 4th, 2008 5:59 am ET

Amazing what you find when you don't believe the hype and do the research………..typical .

Vote GOP

charlotte   February 4th, 2008 5:52 am ET

Yes, we can lie, yes we can

BCarlisle, San Ramon CA   February 4th, 2008 5:39 am ET

I have been on Hillary's side ever since she said she was running. This issue the NYT brought up, being big or small, it is a issues and considering he has only been in the Senate for two years, it doesn't look good. I went and saw Hillary on Friday night in San Jose. It was the most amazing experience I have ever had. She spoke so clearly, on health care, war, economy ect. She really lined out her health care plan as she did in the Debate last Thursday. Obama only talks about "Change" and "Hope", well Listen to Hillary, her substance is change and hope. Please American's VOTE for Hillary on Tuesday. She has the know how to run this country from day 1.

Ann Aloha Independent Thinking, PA   February 4th, 2008 5:39 am ET

$227,000.00 and counting. How many more will now come out of the woodwork?
So much for "It's better give than to recieve" or maybe it was Exelon that gave, Senator Obama recieved and then Illinois had to give to BOTH…and is less safe from notification of leaks or spills.
TO BE CONTINUED

AnaHadWolves   February 4th, 2008 5:16 am ET

Nobama…noway. 'Nuff said. And, I'm a Democrat.

James   February 4th, 2008 4:52 am ET

CLINTON/EDWARDS 2008

James Recto   February 4th, 2008 4:51 am ET

OBAMA can spin OPRAH, SHRIVER, KENNEDYs, LA Times heads but not the rests of US. If OPRAH supports someone we know will LIE to get what he wants,
then should we trust OPRAH that she is genuine about helping the other people?
Remember that OPRAH is the same woman who owns that exclusive school in Africa which was involved in a sickening children exploitation charges, who was entrusted by poor families with their children to have a better future but their future is now in peril because of what had happened in that school. OPRAH's PLAN DESTROYED LIVES OF INNOCENT CHILDREN IN AFRICA SO THAT TELLS YOU ABOUT OBAMA…THEY SAY, TELL ME WHO YOU HANG OUT WITH AND I WILL TELL YOU WHO YOU ARE!

Mitt   February 4th, 2008 4:27 am ET

Wait a minute

I thought the guy covers up well .
That must be a leak accident !

Dem all the way   February 4th, 2008 1:58 am ET

This is just the beginning I think. Obama is a fresh face and new to all of us. We don't know as much as we should about him and the GOP will find out EVERYTHING in the general.

Stick with HILLARY- at least we know everything and she's a FIGHTER!

Cari   February 4th, 2008 1:35 am ET

NY Times is an internationally respected news source. Saying they change news so Clinton wins is a stretch and makes you all look desperate – Obama wouldn't even want your lunacy. That said, I'm happy other people are thinking and reading ALL the articles (pro and con) about the candidates. I've done my homework and am choosing Hillary (I had been leaning to Edwards) – I need Health care to change and she is the only one who gets it. I hope all you Dems out there choose to VOTE regardless of your candidate….what an amazing choice we have!!!

Values voter   February 4th, 2008 1:34 am ET

I am a Democratc that votes my values. I am shocked at what I have read. I can't believe how gullible I am. Is this true?

Against the Cult   February 4th, 2008 1:00 am ET

greg, Hillary will be disclosing all her papers in the next few days. Its in the news, everything will be open, down to her white house schedules.

beth   February 4th, 2008 12:37 am ET

Clinton/Edwards 2008

maxine   February 4th, 2008 12:23 am ET

Research again people, dig a little deeper into the story the newspaper (who is supporting Hillary) is pushing. Get the whole story not just the pieces they want to give you. And again, I will say with the Clintons we never had lies……never……we never had issues with their stories……they were an open book. How many people went to jail for them, to safe their behinds…..Research!!!!!!!

Dem all the way   February 4th, 2008 12:12 am ET

This is just the beginning I think. Obama is a fresh face and new to all of us. We don't know as much as we should about him and the GOP will find out EVERYTHING in the general.

Stick with HILLARY- at least we know everything and she's a FIGHTER!

greg   February 3rd, 2008 10:14 pm ET

No matter, Obama is way cleaner than the Clintons! Why won't Hillary disclose her papers on healthcare? Any shady deals in there? No one is clean–it's politics, we just have to pick the one with the most honesty and integrity. That aint Hillary!

NO OBAMA   February 3rd, 2008 10:02 pm ET

At least most here agree, Obama is a NO vote! He tells half-twisted truths just like most of the others. And, I have yet to hear him speak a full (unrehearsed) sentence without an umm……or ahhh….Flip/floppy and wishy/washy! Says just what the audience wants to hear then on to the next group. I must agree with many on this post, CNN and the media are pro-Obama. They are unfair in their coverage and articles. Poor John Edwards hardly got any airtime, and Hillary's airtime is mostly about Bill… in an unfavorable way. HILLARY 2008!

jay   February 3rd, 2008 10:01 pm ET

I knew it. This guy Barack is a phoney. He stutters and mumbles everytime. I think because he lies. God bless American if he wins. Scary!

Murry   February 3rd, 2008 9:59 pm ET

Well the NY Times is rather biased aren't they?
CNN, can you elaborate on this news item from LA Times please?
"Breaking News: Pro-Clinton push poll erupts in California"
Let's keep the playing field even :-)

dash   February 3rd, 2008 9:53 pm ET

more to defend Mr. Obama..Hope people are listening..

Martin   February 3rd, 2008 9:45 pm ET

With all the issues on the table, this one is very minor. I don't expect Obama to be perfect. He is still the best candidate in my opinion. I don't want to begin to get into all the contradictions, lies, etc. that the Clintons have on record…

Obama '08

bott   February 3rd, 2008 9:31 pm ET

Now let him explain that his record was twisted.

He continue to say he does not collect money from washington lobbyists. Well its certain, he gets money from lobbyists from 50 states.

Why did'nt this make an headline news? Is'nt the media bias about this election. They are bend about Choking Obama down our throat. We will NOT fall for this.

I'm sure there many skeletons waiting to be unveil.

Surely for me, Obama is out of the picture.

Hillary is better.

alto   February 3rd, 2008 9:24 pm ET

The other night at my book club meeting I whispered to my neighbor that I'd started to think of Obama as the Anti-Christ (I'm not even sure what this term really means other than a charismatic figure that sets in motion demonic events.) She looked wide-eyed and replied – "You know, I've been thinking the same thing. If you google "Obama – the anti-christ", you find lots of references. Where is this coming from? I have no idea how this thought entered my consciousness.

independent   February 3rd, 2008 8:56 pm ET

kate, thanks for the intelligent post. i am glad that not all people are so quick to label candidates as a "slime ball" but instead make an effort to think critically. and charlotte, looks like you're still drinking the hatorade. will from CA makes a good point – why is there no coverage about those shady clinton deals? that's ridiculous – if anything it looks like the media coverage is slanted toward clinton simply because they don't publicize all the nasty stuff that the clintons have done a nice job covering up. and it looks like clinton has another media puppet in the NYT. seems like the NYT are trying to cover their rears by doing whatever possible to make sure obama doesn't win. if obama comes from way behind to win, it would sure make the NYT look quite silly and subsequently it would have little credibility for the remainder of the election season.

Viki   February 3rd, 2008 8:50 pm ET

One more time:
What do we know about Obama? Only his words that he is going to bring hope.
How clean is his record? Why do people blindly believe that he will bring change?
I see his speeches where he praising himself. I don't believe he can deliver results.
My vote will go to Hillary.

Californian voter   February 3rd, 2008 7:55 pm ET

What a slime ball! Thank you for this article… no wonder his campaign never gets into specifics… they're incriminating!

NObama!

kate   February 3rd, 2008 7:22 pm ET

Point is he is trying to push through a bill against a corporation .. that should tell you something ..

Gabby   February 3rd, 2008 7:20 pm ET

Oh, so he can defend his records and any other person can not?…..fair is fair…..

charlotte   February 3rd, 2008 7:16 pm ET

Obama is a liar, plain and simple?

JohnS   February 3rd, 2008 6:59 pm ET

Angelita:

Do not feel bitter by these endorsements. These women are trying to SAVE
1. The Dems
2. The souls of minorities
3. The women's movement

Unfortunately, with all the loud talk, the Clintons appointed the least number of minorities to position durinh their terms in office. Even Bush, with all his probelms, has more Latino/Latina and other minorities than did the Clintons.

So, look up to these women, they just might be telling you something very important!!! Do not waste your vote on Hillary; in the end you will live to regret it.

brian   February 3rd, 2008 6:30 pm ET

Yes, charlotte Exelon is a special interest group.

Yes, lugina I also read that story.

Sara   February 3rd, 2008 6:14 pm ET

Obama to have ads during superbowl thats a big gamble…People dont want to see politics during the superbowl and Im an Obama supporter

showmehillary   February 3rd, 2008 6:13 pm ET

Why is this buried in the ticker when the story about Bill was headline news on CNN and MSNBC earlier this week when it didn't even have anything to do with Hillary? I didn't want to believe it, but there is a media bias in this election.

Joe   February 3rd, 2008 6:01 pm ET

The Chicago Tribune features a similar story on a different topic. While Sen. Obama on the stump tells people about the plight of Maytag workers who lost their jobs, ("Obama's fundraising collides with his rhetoric") the Tribune documents that the union covering those workers believes they got no help from the Senator, who was again taking significant contributions and bundling from one of the company's directors and biggest investors.

And yesterday there was an AP story where Senator Obama told the voters of Idaho: "And then there are people who say, 'Well, he doesn't believe in the Second Amendment,' even though I come from a state — we've got a lot of hunters in downstate Illinois. And I have no intention of taking away folks' guns." But he didn't disclose to those voters, as the AP said that "he does support gun control and has a record of voting for it in the Illinois Senate. He backed limiting handgun purchases to one a month, but he made no attempts to ban them." When he originally ran for the state legislature 12 years ago, he filled out a questionnaire saying he ''supported banning the manufacture, sale and possession of handguns." He gave the voters of Idaho no indication whatsoever of either his record in the State Senate or his prior views on the questionnaire.

Mose   February 3rd, 2008 5:50 pm ET

How intelligent do you think the Kennedys are? Very if you asked me, as well as millions of others. It is nothing new aout Obamas campaign and what he stands for. There has been serious misconceptions about him being a muslem, but its overlooked by most radical people even when he plegeds alligence to the flag at senate meetings as well as other documented occurences. I also find that voting for the war was ok for Clinton but again some radicals overlook Obamas stand from the begining.
I see the former President Clinton taking the position of president instead of his wife, another scandal in the White House. If the facts were presented properly we would not have these Clinton under tactics so convieniently timed, especially from Clintons favored New York.
Hog Wash– Obama for President.,

Judith, Ridgewood, NJ   February 3rd, 2008 5:32 pm ET

Well I wonder why this article is coming out now ….who's hoping there is no time to set the facts straight. Another example of anything to win politics.

Oliver, East Los Angeles   February 3rd, 2008 5:30 pm ET

Obama talks a good game, but when it comes down to it, he doesn't practices what he PREACHES.

He says, that he is new style of politician, that this election is about a change in Washington instead of business as usual, the past and the future.

But, now we find out, that he is like every other politician, he is business as usual, and he resorts to the same tactics as everyone else.

Its about time a journalist did his job, looked deeply into Obama's record, and knock him off that moral High Horse he sits on.

Myrna   February 3rd, 2008 5:19 pm ET

Why isn't this front page in other newspapers? Why hasn't this issue been brought up by Bltzer and other pundits? What's their agenda?

Jack, Greenville, SC   February 3rd, 2008 5:16 pm ET

Please publish my post. There was nothing wrong with it. If you wait too long it will be buried. I hope that is not the point.

Will, CA   February 3rd, 2008 5:05 pm ET

Special standard? I doubt it.

Clinton is lucky the media decided to provide late coverage on Bill Clinton's $130 million deal with the Kazakhstan government and a Canadian billionaire. That would just be another example of lobbyist influence on the Clinton's.

The media fails to cover everything for everybody exactly when they want to hear it. Deal with it. I am still waiting on the shady Clinton deal to get played up.

me too   February 3rd, 2008 5:01 pm ET

You won't even find a mention of it on some of the other news media's websites. What a sorry state….the media have let Americans down. To have thought naively that they could be "Fair"!!!!

Donna F   February 3rd, 2008 4:59 pm ET

WEll, so much for fighting and sticking with it attitude and defeating the old system of letting big business and or the other side of the aisle influence goals.
Obama does not have follow thru…has spent way too much time running for something he does not have enough ummph for yet. Hillary has always worked with both side and fights hard for her bills.

you   February 3rd, 2008 4:54 pm ET

Psssh… whatever. He'll never be as dirty as the Clintons' already are. You want to talk about lack of reporting? Please. The Clintons are the most scandalous couple that has ever been in the White House. How much do you hear of? What's that? Nothing? That's right… A couple quick searches on Google will reveal plenty… pay no heed to the conspiracies. There is plenty of real scandal.

charlotte   February 3rd, 2008 4:53 pm ET

.
So lets see, is that a lie? $227,000 from Exelon, is that like, oh I dunno, special interest money?

From PA   February 3rd, 2008 4:50 pm ET

Someone needs to look closer at Obamas past. And the high profile endorsements he is gettting…the very thing he is not for, apparently.

I want Obama supporters to name 3 things he has accomplished as a senator?

And give 3 solid reasons why they are supporting him.

I bet many can't come up with them, except the "change", no more clintons, and apparently she was the only one that said we need to go to war, in those exact words.

By the way, with Clintons presidency…US was doing good. He cheated yes, so did MLK, JFK, and Gandhi. But they are still great leaders and their spouses had morals. For those questioning Hillary's Morals.

Think before you vote, don't let the media influence your vote!!

I wonder if exon donated some money……..

Andrea   February 3rd, 2008 4:50 pm ET

And the voters are going for this?

Robert   February 3rd, 2008 4:49 pm ET

Obama is a professional Politician like all of them. And his phony preacher rapping and clapping at campaign events is particularly stupid.

lugina   February 3rd, 2008 4:48 pm ET

In Maytag shutdown, Obama's fundraising collides with his rhetoric..Wake up America…

SLO Bear   February 3rd, 2008 4:45 pm ET

Do the timing and placement, Sunday and first page above the fold, reflect a need to be "right," given the LA Times and other papers' recent endorsement of Barack Obama? It reminds me a little of Senator Edwards' comment in the debate about the forces of the status quo rising to quash agents of change.

Sol   February 3rd, 2008 4:42 pm ET

Cant spin out of this one Sen Obama

Bill from CT   February 3rd, 2008 4:41 pm ET

and you see this as newsworthy?

Democrat   February 3rd, 2008 4:41 pm ET

Just because Sen. Obama has taken a lot of money from the nuclear power industry and he has fought on their behalf doesn't make him a bad candidate.

A lot of Democrats are very pro-nuclear like Sen. Obama.

Ray   February 3rd, 2008 4:40 pm ET

typical Obama.."Im thats not what I mean, ummm, ummm, they twisted what I said, ummm ummm, Thats not ummmm"

Hillary 08!!!

Lena   February 3rd, 2008 4:35 pm ET

The NY Times printed this story mere days before Super Tuesday and made sure it was on the front page? Coincidence? I don't think so. Oh by the way, didn't the newspaper just endorse Hillary Clinton? It would certainly explain why they're publishing this story on the front cover and hiding the one about bill clinton and his multi-millionaire friends' donations to his wife's campaign. Right.

Peter   February 3rd, 2008 4:34 pm ET

Odd that the Obama Cult could find the time to snark about the President going to church, but no comments by them on this item. (This item was posted an hour before the President item). I'm sure they are researching the issue so that they can make an educated response.

me   February 3rd, 2008 4:30 pm ET

Now shouldn't the press have reported on this way back instead of allowing Senator Obama continue along the path of fabrication, exaggeration and misconceptions?

Is it a special standard? When any other candidate would do such a thing, it would be front and center for days in the news, yet this candidate enjoys errors to drift, why?

Louis   February 3rd, 2008 4:29 pm ET

I voted for it before I voted against it.

No wonder Kerry endorsed you.

GO HILLARY!!!

We don't want another Media Puppet promising unity (last one to do so? George W. Bush).

KD   February 3rd, 2008 4:29 pm ET

Didn't the New York Times article say that Barack considered it a success because the company decided to comply anyway?

Susan in Cincinnati   February 3rd, 2008 4:29 pm ET

Oh sure he defends his record…..

But I thought he was above all this stuff. Taking money from big energy, eh? Isn't that kinda related to big oil??

How many other of these little "leaks" are the we going to find *if* he gets our nomination?

kwami   February 3rd, 2008 4:27 pm ET

Why should any one worry about the New York Times publication? They are not neutral in this race because thay have endorsed Hillary. The only reason they are doing this is simply bring Obama down, something that predictably will fail. Everybody can read through it!

Chris, Orlando, FL   February 3rd, 2008 4:12 pm ET

Tsk Tsk Tsk, Senator Obama. I'm sure your cheerleading squad will run to your defense, though, as they always do when someone challenges your record or calls you out on a lie.

Rhonda   February 3rd, 2008 4:10 pm ET

Thank God some exposed the deceit.

jp   February 3rd, 2008 4:06 pm ET

WOW THERE IS NOTHING LIKE THE TRUTH
THIS GUY WAS FULL OF AIR FROM THE BEGINNING
I WOULD NOT BE SURPRISED IF HE IS BEING BACKED BY KARL ROVE AND THE REP RIGHT
THIS GUY ENTERTAINS THE KIDS WITH HS ACT OF LOVE AND HOPE THEY BETTER DO RESEARCH BEFORE BUYING THIS GUYS SPIN BUT THEN AGAIN THEY HAVE BEEN RAISED ON BRINEY DR. PHIL AND YOU TUBE THEY PROBABLY WONT READ THE ARTICLE I DID

WH, Illinois   February 3rd, 2008 3:56 pm ET

Obama's starting to get caught up in his lies. How can we trust a person who touts "change", but lines his pockets with money from a nuclear company that subjects the public to nuclear waste? The worst of it is that people have been, and will again, be subjected to poisoning by nuclear companies who do not want to take responsibility for contaminating water supplies. And Obama covers for them because he's too worried about making them mad and/or irritating the Republicans. I'm sure Obama will find a way to spin this so that he doesn't look guilty or, at the very least, less culpable than he really is.

It's kind of the same as when he voted "present" on legislation that would have forced him to take a stand on issues that would have pitted him against some Republicans. The fact that he refused to take stands on some serious issues, at times being the ONLY person to give a "present" vote on serious issues, which speaks volumes about his actual ability to take charge and stand up for what's right. He is a "Yes" man and, if by some miracle he is elected as President, he will become a puppet for the Republicans.

Is anyone noticing a pattern here????

Oliver, Los Angeles   February 3rd, 2008 3:56 pm ET

If Obama was so against the WAR, then why did he vote to fund the war?
Dennis Kucinich voted against authorizing the war in Iraq and against funding its continuation. Why?

Because like every other politician, Obama knew it would be political suicide for him to vote against funding.

But the media lets him off the hook and allows him to say he has always been against the war, even if his votes don't support his claim.

Brian Waters   February 3rd, 2008 3:53 pm ET

WOW!! This is to be expected. Borack Obama clearly have gain huge momentum. I was a huge supporter of Hillary and yes, like many had a change of heart. I consider my self a hardcore democrat. With that said, Hillary aswer on the last televised debate was the turning point for me. Hillary did not answer the question in regards to WHY?? she voted Yes on the Iaq war. She not only try to avoid the issue, she dance arounded it too!!! FoR some reason she does not want to come clean. Hillary has lost lots of votes because of the war issue. In order to win the general election you must run on a powerfull platform, Hillary does not have one. First she the same way McCain did so it will be hard to beat him on this issue. Lets all remember after all he is a war hero. The other issue with Hillary is her out of control Health plan. Her plan is a Universal mandate, what that means? Well it means that if you dont join her mandate you will have penalty. To this day Hillary has not explain what type of penalty is going to be nor has she explain what type of mandated her health plan will be. Please dont take my word I encorouge all to research this inforamtion, like I did. Lets remember I was a huge Hillary supporter so my homework was done. Thr last issue is very important for all democrats this is why??? In order to win the general elections you must without a dought bring in Republicans and Independents or you will not win, period. Borack Obama has proven in the past to work well with Republicans and we all know he has a huge independent following. Hillary does not do well with republicans an this is a fact. Republicans dont like her. This is fact. Borack has a paltform to win, WHY?? He said NO to the war from the Start. He has a has the ability to chip away republicans to his side. Borack has a huge following with the independent voter. Borack has a the advantage over Hillary to beat the McCain and thats a fact. I have political experience, but Im not the only one saying this, other experience experts are saying the same.

Kingsley Brown   February 3rd, 2008 3:51 pm ET

What has the New York Times article got to do with issues at stake?………….I think it's time people concern themselves with what is important and stop chasing shadows. the truth is that Senator Obama holds the key to a new America filled with hope and wellness for all. I wonder why this article is being published two days to the 'super tuesday'

apollo   February 3rd, 2008 3:49 pm ET

Will he defend the record of his racist church?

I want to help other countries, work with other cultures and races, but being anti-white does not help heal the racial divide.

tucc.org. go to his church's website and look at the pro-Africa, pro-black, anti-white stance of the church. You say it isn't racist? Do a cut/copy of the church's founding principles. Paste it into ms word. Hit ctrl f do a find/replace of black with white…then read the document. I placed it on several websites and was told to stop placing racist material on open blogs…if pro-white is racist, anti-white is racist, as well.

Obama is not a healer, he is a divider.

As for his policies, he has no clue how to run a business, a lemonade stand, let alone the largest entity in the world, as the chief executive of the executive branch of the federal government, in charge of our lives.

Obama is not presidential.

adams   February 3rd, 2008 3:48 pm ET

OBAMA CONTINUES TO BE A THREAT TO NATIONAL MATURITY.
———————————————————————————————

WITH OBAMA'S BIG EGO AND LITTLE EXPERIENCE HE CONTINUES HIS CRUSADE TO HAND THE NEO CONS THE WHITE HOUSE.

WE ALL KNOW IT WILL TAKE A HEAVY WEIGHT LIKE HILLARY TO TAKE BACK OUR DEAR WHITE HOUSE.

VOTE TO WIN, THINK!

AW   February 3rd, 2008 3:48 pm ET

Their fact check is not reporting the facts. The new version of the bill does not "require" notification it states "shall consider" immediate public notification.

Viki   February 3rd, 2008 3:47 pm ET

What do we know about Obama? Only his words that he is going to bring hope.
How clean is his record? Why do people blindly believe that he will bring change?
I see his speeches where he praising himself. I don't believe he can deliver results.
My vote will go to Hillary.

cristina   February 3rd, 2008 3:46 pm ET

People are waking out of the dreams!!!

GO HILLARY!!!!

charlotte   February 3rd, 2008 3:36 pm ET

So lets see, is that a lie? $227,000 from Exelon, is that like, oh I dunno, special interest money?

Vote   February 3rd, 2008 3:35 pm ET

And we want Obama as our President?

Obama is not straight on any of his answers. He is decietful in so many ways. (read for yourself) The property/house he bought in Chicago was not 100% legitimate (read for yourself)

Go Hillary 2008!

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room. Download this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

Follow us on Twitter

CNN on TwitterGet Ticker updates the moment they appear online via the Web, SMS, or instant messages.
Follow politicalticker

Categories
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. All comments should be relevant to the topic and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. You are solely responsible for your own comments, the consequences of posting those comments, and the consequences of any reliance by you on the comments of others. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying and other information you provide via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2008 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com VIP