<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clinton chairman: Obama would be good running mate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/</link>
	<description>All politics, all the time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:07:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gino Loloya</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-520504</link>
		<dc:creator>Gino Loloya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 19:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-520504</guid>
		<description>Clinton needs to press on the specific points if she wins to win the democratic nomination. Obama&#039;s lackluster on specifics and lack of a longer experience can and will hurt him even if he is elected to be the President.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clinton needs to press on the specific points if she wins to win the democratic nomination. Obama's lackluster on specifics and lack of a longer experience can and will hurt him even if he is elected to be the President.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hey, CNN - What Happened to "Fair &#38; Balanced" Coverage???</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-485955</link>
		<dc:creator>Hey, CNN - What Happened to "Fair &#38; Balanced" Coverage???</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 19:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-485955</guid>
		<description>Hey, CNN...

Whatever happened to “fair &amp; balanced” coverage of the Democratic &amp; Republican primaries???

I&#039;m an African American, Princeton educated woman who STRONGLY endorses Hillary Clinton…And because I’m somewhat of a “political junkie”, I’d done my homework on each presidential candidate (both Republican &amp; Democrat), so I’d decided to support Senator Clinton several months ago.   However, it seems as though the “media’s” shameless, sleazy, “tabloid like&quot; coverage of the Democratic and Republican primaries has had a PROFOUND impact on these Presidential primaries.  Thankfully, I’m not the only person who has noticed that the “media’s” coverage of the Democratic Primary is SEVERELY skewed, and clearly favors Barak Obama.  To that end, I invite my fellow Americans to “cruise” through the blogs on CNN.  You’ll observe that many other American’s are genuinely disgusted by CNN’s RAPTUROUS FASCINATION with the “Obama Phenomenon”….Check it out for yourselves…

MOREOVER, INSTEAD OF PROVIDNG AMERICANS WITH THE UNBIASED, CRITICAL INFORMATION THAT’S NEEDED TO MAKE INFORMED DECISIONS REGARDING EACH CANIDIATE’S QUALIFICATIONS FOR THE PRESIDENCY, CNN &amp; MSNBC, et. al . ARE ACTUALLY “MANIPULATED” THE OUTCOME OF THESE PRIMARIES.  Moe specifically, I’ve noticed a great deal of “Clinton bashing”, as well as a great deal of “Obama worship”…

Needless to say, it’s genuinely disheartening to know that the “media” (i.e., CNN, MSNBC, et.al) can so easily manipulate those Americans that are either ill-informed or misinformed with distorted “60 SECOND SOUND BITES” and sensationalistic “YELLOW JOURNALISM”….</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, CNN...</p>
<p>Whatever happened to “fair &amp; balanced” coverage of the Democratic &amp; Republican primaries???</p>
<p>I'm an African American, Princeton educated woman who STRONGLY endorses Hillary Clinton…And because I’m somewhat of a “political junkie”, I’d done my homework on each presidential candidate (both Republican &amp; Democrat), so I’d decided to support Senator Clinton several months ago.   However, it seems as though the “media’s” shameless, sleazy, “tabloid like" coverage of the Democratic and Republican primaries has had a PROFOUND impact on these Presidential primaries.  Thankfully, I’m not the only person who has noticed that the “media’s” coverage of the Democratic Primary is SEVERELY skewed, and clearly favors Barak Obama.  To that end, I invite my fellow Americans to “cruise” through the blogs on CNN.  You’ll observe that many other American’s are genuinely disgusted by CNN’s RAPTUROUS FASCINATION with the “Obama Phenomenon”….Check it out for yourselves…</p>
<p>MOREOVER, INSTEAD OF PROVIDNG AMERICANS WITH THE UNBIASED, CRITICAL INFORMATION THAT’S NEEDED TO MAKE INFORMED DECISIONS REGARDING EACH CANIDIATE’S QUALIFICATIONS FOR THE PRESIDENCY, CNN &amp; MSNBC, et. al . ARE ACTUALLY “MANIPULATED” THE OUTCOME OF THESE PRIMARIES.  Moe specifically, I’ve noticed a great deal of “Clinton bashing”, as well as a great deal of “Obama worship”…</p>
<p>Needless to say, it’s genuinely disheartening to know that the “media” (i.e., CNN, MSNBC, et.al) can so easily manipulate those Americans that are either ill-informed or misinformed with distorted “60 SECOND SOUND BITES” and sensationalistic “YELLOW JOURNALISM”….</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rukhsana</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-476980</link>
		<dc:creator>Rukhsana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 22:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-476980</guid>
		<description>It is time to get all this hate out of the way, before Obama supporters get carried away. We older women have experienced discrimination in the worst possible way. All the younger women who say they do not have that problem at their jobs have us older women to thank.
I want a strong leader who thinks on their feet, not speeches. Sittting in the Oval office typing speeches won&#039;t run the wheels of government.
Look deeper newsmen, Obama can&#039;t be without fault. Why this campaign to build Obama up by the media. You are reporters. Report the news not twist it.
Clinton is the strong leader I seek, and no Bill Clinton will not be neede to support her. Uncle teddy on the other hand will need to hold Obama&#039;s hand.
By the way if Obama is the nominee I will vote for him. I know how to lose with grace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is time to get all this hate out of the way, before Obama supporters get carried away. We older women have experienced discrimination in the worst possible way. All the younger women who say they do not have that problem at their jobs have us older women to thank.<br />
I want a strong leader who thinks on their feet, not speeches. Sittting in the Oval office typing speeches won't run the wheels of government.<br />
Look deeper newsmen, Obama can't be without fault. Why this campaign to build Obama up by the media. You are reporters. Report the news not twist it.<br />
Clinton is the strong leader I seek, and no Bill Clinton will not be neede to support her. Uncle teddy on the other hand will need to hold Obama's hand.<br />
By the way if Obama is the nominee I will vote for him. I know how to lose with grace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcibme</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-475204</link>
		<dc:creator>jcibme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-475204</guid>
		<description>Obama/Clinton ticket PLEASE.... Alot of people are so divided between the two, we want them both. They would make the strongest team U.S.A. has ever seen. Please don&#039;t divide the country further, this Election is about change and should be about bringing people together; who better to show this path and how to achieve this goal but the two top candidates in this election?! America has spoken we want both!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama/Clinton ticket PLEASE.... Alot of people are so divided between the two, we want them both. They would make the strongest team U.S.A. has ever seen. Please don't divide the country further, this Election is about change and should be about bringing people together; who better to show this path and how to achieve this goal but the two top candidates in this election?! America has spoken we want both!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike McGowan</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-471709</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike McGowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 13:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-471709</guid>
		<description>The real problem with a Clinton/Obama ticket is that IF the Clinton administration is caught up in some type of scandal or in too deep then Obama becomes involved in a mess that turns him a very young Mondale and his career is gone...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real problem with a Clinton/Obama ticket is that IF the Clinton administration is caught up in some type of scandal or in too deep then Obama becomes involved in a mess that turns him a very young Mondale and his career is gone...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard Ino</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-471689</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard Ino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 13:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-471689</guid>
		<description>Clinton
Clinton
Obama

Mr. Obama is WAY too savvy for that Menage a Trois!!!

Better to wait 4 years and REALLY run on change!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clinton<br />
Clinton<br />
Obama</p>
<p>Mr. Obama is WAY too savvy for that Menage a Trois!!!</p>
<p>Better to wait 4 years and REALLY run on change!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-471629</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 13:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-471629</guid>
		<description>I think the democrats have managed to salvage a loss out of a sure win with their candidates.  Much like picking the smug unlikable Kerry in 2004, Clinton the insincere, hustler with little real experience and Obama the smooth talking, empty suit with absolutely no real experience have very strong negatives.  Put them on the same ticket and watch the dems go down in flames again.  The best democrat running is John McCain.  I expect a large crossover vote for him and another dem defeat.

Silly liberals!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the democrats have managed to salvage a loss out of a sure win with their candidates.  Much like picking the smug unlikable Kerry in 2004, Clinton the insincere, hustler with little real experience and Obama the smooth talking, empty suit with absolutely no real experience have very strong negatives.  Put them on the same ticket and watch the dems go down in flames again.  The best democrat running is John McCain.  I expect a large crossover vote for him and another dem defeat.</p>
<p>Silly liberals!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Aucoin</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-471535</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Aucoin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 12:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-471535</guid>
		<description>Though interesting in theory, I cannot see how these two come together to form the Democratic Party ticket for &#039;08. I do not think there is bad blood between them and the issues of race baiting that were prevelant during the SC primary were, I believe, an isolated occurance. Having said that, I see both candidates as being too &#039;alpha&#039; to accept a VP role comfortably. Additonally, the polls/election returns show that each candidate also enjoys wide spread support. This means that if Sen. Clinton or Obama were to take the VP slot, the ticket could be seen as having to much charge in the #2 spot, which begs the question; who are we really voting for? Finally, can a Clinton/Obama ticket, or vice versa, handle Former President Clinton? We know that he will act as an unofficial VP if Mrs. Clinton is elected. How would this be received by Sen. Obama if elected VP? On the reverse, what role would he play if his wife were VP? I believe as many of you do, that an Obama/Clinton - Clinton/Obama ticket would completely dominate any Republican ticket, but how do we make it work?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though interesting in theory, I cannot see how these two come together to form the Democratic Party ticket for '08. I do not think there is bad blood between them and the issues of race baiting that were prevelant during the SC primary were, I believe, an isolated occurance. Having said that, I see both candidates as being too 'alpha' to accept a VP role comfortably. Additonally, the polls/election returns show that each candidate also enjoys wide spread support. This means that if Sen. Clinton or Obama were to take the VP slot, the ticket could be seen as having to much charge in the #2 spot, which begs the question; who are we really voting for? Finally, can a Clinton/Obama ticket, or vice versa, handle Former President Clinton? We know that he will act as an unofficial VP if Mrs. Clinton is elected. How would this be received by Sen. Obama if elected VP? On the reverse, what role would he play if his wife were VP? I believe as many of you do, that an Obama/Clinton &#8211; Clinton/Obama ticket would completely dominate any Republican ticket, but how do we make it work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly in Denver Colorado</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-471495</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly in Denver Colorado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 12:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-471495</guid>
		<description>zzzzzzzzzz!  

Nice try Terry McAuliffe!  In your dreams Obama would join your candidates ticket!  You and Hillary are in denial that the American public HATE the Clinton&#039;s mafia style Washington politics.  Hopefully Obama doesn&#039;t piss Hillary off too much and have him pushing daisies of like Vince Foster!!

While I am Republican, I could not TAKe another 4 years of the Clinton&#039;s in the White House.  If McCain gets the nomination for the GOP, I WILL vote for Obama...give the people what they want.  For every Jimmy Carter type president, it will make way for a Ronald Reagan to clean up Democratic disasters.  Even if a Democrat makes it to the White House this time, the American public is not stupid enough to elect all of one party for all branches of govt--Senate, Congress,etc...!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>zzzzzzzzzz!  </p>
<p>Nice try Terry McAuliffe!  In your dreams Obama would join your candidates ticket!  You and Hillary are in denial that the American public HATE the Clinton's mafia style Washington politics.  Hopefully Obama doesn't piss Hillary off too much and have him pushing daisies of like Vince Foster!!</p>
<p>While I am Republican, I could not TAKe another 4 years of the Clinton's in the White House.  If McCain gets the nomination for the GOP, I WILL vote for Obama...give the people what they want.  For every Jimmy Carter type president, it will make way for a Ronald Reagan to clean up Democratic disasters.  Even if a Democrat makes it to the White House this time, the American public is not stupid enough to elect all of one party for all branches of govt&#8211;Senate, Congress,etc...!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-471179</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 09:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-471179</guid>
		<description>Stay away from the Clinton&#039;s!  I know of them from way back...Stay away Mr. Obama</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stay away from the Clinton's!  I know of them from way back...Stay away Mr. Obama</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kip</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-470742</link>
		<dc:creator>kip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 07:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-470742</guid>
		<description>A Clinton rubber door stopper would get more respect than a Clinton Vice President!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Clinton rubber door stopper would get more respect than a Clinton Vice President!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larry boucher</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-470730</link>
		<dc:creator>larry boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 07:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-470730</guid>
		<description>Clinton now Gore latee.......Whoops guess after a Clinton it  VP it Never Works!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clinton now Gore latee.......Whoops guess after a Clinton it  VP it Never Works!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New England Voter</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-469744</link>
		<dc:creator>New England Voter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 05:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-469744</guid>
		<description>What are Vice Presidents traditionally?  Attack dogs.  Senator Obama is neither an attack dog nor a Vice President.  He will not risk Clinton scandals attaching themselves to him...EVER.

President Obama, with Senator Clinton for his first Supreme Court nominee.  There she would flourish in her many talents and Bill would be away from her center of influence there.  Perfect solution!  

And we&#039;re sparked Billary being appointed as a 2 for 1 to the Supreme Court because Bill has been disbarred.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are Vice Presidents traditionally?  Attack dogs.  Senator Obama is neither an attack dog nor a Vice President.  He will not risk Clinton scandals attaching themselves to him...EVER.</p>
<p>President Obama, with Senator Clinton for his first Supreme Court nominee.  There she would flourish in her many talents and Bill would be away from her center of influence there.  Perfect solution!  </p>
<p>And we're sparked Billary being appointed as a 2 for 1 to the Supreme Court because Bill has been disbarred.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Clifford</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-469461</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Clifford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 04:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-469461</guid>
		<description>I want to see her put Bill in the VP slot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to see her put Bill in the VP slot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PreCustomer</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-469316</link>
		<dc:creator>PreCustomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 04:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-469316</guid>
		<description>Perfect!
As someone almost certain to vote Republican, I can&#039;t think of a better &quot;opponent&quot; than a Clinton/Obama ticket.

PLEASE make this happen!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perfect!<br />
As someone almost certain to vote Republican, I can't think of a better "opponent" than a Clinton/Obama ticket.</p>
<p>PLEASE make this happen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-469248</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 04:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-469248</guid>
		<description>If Obama consents to be Hillary&#039;s VP he has lost my vote in any future election.  And if he picks Hillary as a VP he has lost my vote.  He is the one who is dynamic, experienced, an agent of change, charismatic, etc.  He needs to stay above the corruption of Hillary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Obama consents to be Hillary's VP he has lost my vote in any future election.  And if he picks Hillary as a VP he has lost my vote.  He is the one who is dynamic, experienced, an agent of change, charismatic, etc.  He needs to stay above the corruption of Hillary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j'adoube</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-469228</link>
		<dc:creator>j'adoube</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 04:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-469228</guid>
		<description>Kucinich/Tinky Winky &#039;08

Dream Ticket!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kucinich/Tinky Winky '08</p>
<p>Dream Ticket!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rex Range</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-469220</link>
		<dc:creator>Rex Range</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 04:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-469220</guid>
		<description>WHEN BARACK WINS THE NOMINATION HE CANNOT CHOOSE HILLARY AS VP. AMERICA IS VOTING FOR A CANDIDATE WITH INTEGRITY WHO WILL UNITE US. IF HE CHOOSES HILLARY HE WILL RUIN IT ALL AND THE NATION WILL ELECT A REPUBLICAN. BUT FIRST...EVERYONE WITH PRIMARIES COMING UP: VOTE FOR BARACK!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WHEN BARACK WINS THE NOMINATION HE CANNOT CHOOSE HILLARY AS VP. AMERICA IS VOTING FOR A CANDIDATE WITH INTEGRITY WHO WILL UNITE US. IF HE CHOOSES HILLARY HE WILL RUIN IT ALL AND THE NATION WILL ELECT A REPUBLICAN. BUT FIRST...EVERYONE WITH PRIMARIES COMING UP: VOTE FOR BARACK!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: margaret vanostrand</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-469202</link>
		<dc:creator>margaret vanostrand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 04:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-469202</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t even want Hillary to try for the vice presidency when Obama is elected president. Then again, he&#039;s too smart to ask her.

Hillary is a politician while Obama is a statesman. 

I have respect for him, but little for her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't even want Hillary to try for the vice presidency when Obama is elected president. Then again, he's too smart to ask her.</p>
<p>Hillary is a politician while Obama is a statesman. </p>
<p>I have respect for him, but little for her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Minyard</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-468276</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Minyard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 01:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-468276</guid>
		<description>Obama would make a great VP, as his Senate record reflects, because VPs don&#039;t have to decide anything at all (ie. skipping any vote that requires taking a difficult stand), and aren&#039;t missed when they don&#039;t show up for work.  A Clinton/Obama ticket would be a loss for America and a win for just about everyone else except Israel and Iraq.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama would make a great VP, as his Senate record reflects, because VPs don't have to decide anything at all (ie. skipping any vote that requires taking a difficult stand), and aren't missed when they don't show up for work.  A Clinton/Obama ticket would be a loss for America and a win for just about everyone else except Israel and Iraq.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Strup  - Catawba North Carolina</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-468175</link>
		<dc:creator>James Strup  - Catawba North Carolina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 01:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-468175</guid>
		<description>Who really thinks that a ticket with two first can win? A woman and an African American American. There isn&#039;t a southern white male anywhere that will vote for that. White men have run this country since the beginning and still do. If the dems want a losing ticket put both of them together. Separately maybe one could maybe win. Hillary still has 50 percent of the people who will not vote for her no matter what. The only way she wins is if there is a third party. Just like hubby got in because Perot put him in office the same goes for her. Her politics are just left of Joe Stalin. At least Barrack gives the country some positive outlook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who really thinks that a ticket with two first can win? A woman and an African American American. There isn't a southern white male anywhere that will vote for that. White men have run this country since the beginning and still do. If the dems want a losing ticket put both of them together. Separately maybe one could maybe win. Hillary still has 50 percent of the people who will not vote for her no matter what. The only way she wins is if there is a third party. Just like hubby got in because Perot put him in office the same goes for her. Her politics are just left of Joe Stalin. At least Barrack gives the country some positive outlook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fernando de Magalllanes</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-468076</link>
		<dc:creator>Fernando de Magalllanes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 01:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-468076</guid>
		<description>It would not suprise me if Hillary picked Obama for her VP.  Remember, the Clintons will do anything, say anything, and appear to be anything that the voters want to get elected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would not suprise me if Hillary picked Obama for her VP.  Remember, the Clintons will do anything, say anything, and appear to be anything that the voters want to get elected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sista2sisthas</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-468066</link>
		<dc:creator>sista2sisthas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 01:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-468066</guid>
		<description>Obama running with anyone other then a Clinton, yes I said it, who wants to see Bill Clinton in the White House trying to play Vice President? Perhaps John Edwards is waiting in the wings..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama running with anyone other then a Clinton, yes I said it, who wants to see Bill Clinton in the White House trying to play Vice President? Perhaps John Edwards is waiting in the wings..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conservative Professor</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-468052</link>
		<dc:creator>Conservative Professor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 01:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-468052</guid>
		<description>And, I&#039;ve got a water front property to sell Barack at the North Pole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, I've got a water front property to sell Barack at the North Pole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JW Morrison</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-467784</link>
		<dc:creator>JW Morrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 01:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-467784</guid>
		<description>I will vote for Obama but not for Clinton.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will vote for Obama but not for Clinton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-467763</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 01:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-467763</guid>
		<description>Obama should show that he is willing to work with the other party by asking Romney to be his VP.  Many conservative republicans don&#039;t like McCain, and this would give them a great ticket to vote for.  People are fed up with the party system - the first candidate to go across parties will be elected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama should show that he is willing to work with the other party by asking Romney to be his VP.  Many conservative republicans don't like McCain, and this would give them a great ticket to vote for.  People are fed up with the party system &#8211; the first candidate to go across parties will be elected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike in tn</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-467700</link>
		<dc:creator>mike in tn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 00:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-467700</guid>
		<description>would you like to be pres with Hill as vp.
life expectancy - short</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>would you like to be pres with Hill as vp.<br />
life expectancy &#8211; short</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John, Kansas</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-467672</link>
		<dc:creator>John, Kansas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 00:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-467672</guid>
		<description>If we truly wish to beat McCain in the general election, it has got to be someone who has the &quot;experience&quot; working with Washington, i.e. Sen. Clinton, not someone who is running without the knowledge and experience of working within the system.  Think about it, the last time we tried that was Jimmy Carter, and to be honest, that didn&#039;t go so well for the Democratic party.....we ended up with 12 years of Republican rule, plus 8 more years on top of that because of the residual power that Bush swayed.  This being said, Sen. Obama would, at this point, make a wonderful number two on the ticket and a great heir apparent for Clinton.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we truly wish to beat McCain in the general election, it has got to be someone who has the "experience" working with Washington, i.e. Sen. Clinton, not someone who is running without the knowledge and experience of working within the system.  Think about it, the last time we tried that was Jimmy Carter, and to be honest, that didn't go so well for the Democratic party.....we ended up with 12 years of Republican rule, plus 8 more years on top of that because of the residual power that Bush swayed.  This being said, Sen. Obama would, at this point, make a wonderful number two on the ticket and a great heir apparent for Clinton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: koffi101</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-467654</link>
		<dc:creator>koffi101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 00:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-467654</guid>
		<description>To Rechi I guess I could be incredibly loyal, to Obama that is. First question, how can you get experience if  no one employs you? second question what does experience have to do with it, eg. Bush 2 term, Bill Clinton&#039;s 2 term, both were huge dissapointments. Third question when you get promoted to a new postion how do you know you are ready for the job? answer, you don&#039;t, point is you never know what you are ready for until you embrace the task. I&#039;m down for Barack all the way,I mean what is the worst he can do? steal from another country and cause a fight, ooops Bush already did that.  GOOOOOOOO Baaammmma</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Rechi I guess I could be incredibly loyal, to Obama that is. First question, how can you get experience if  no one employs you? second question what does experience have to do with it, eg. Bush 2 term, Bill Clinton's 2 term, both were huge dissapointments. Third question when you get promoted to a new postion how do you know you are ready for the job? answer, you don't, point is you never know what you are ready for until you embrace the task. I'm down for Barack all the way,I mean what is the worst he can do? steal from another country and cause a fight, ooops Bush already did that.  GOOOOOOOO Baaammmma</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sen. Macapinlac(D-CA)</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-467634</link>
		<dc:creator>Sen. Macapinlac(D-CA)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 00:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-467634</guid>
		<description>It wouldn&#039;t be wise to pick a VP who would overshadow the top of the ticket...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wouldn't be wise to pick a VP who would overshadow the top of the ticket...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-467608</link>
		<dc:creator>G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 00:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-467608</guid>
		<description>Mike:

I take issue with your post.  Those who make the biggest issue out of spelling and grammar always seem to lack any real substance and don&#039;t inform much.  Of course we can inform ourselves fro CNN, MSDNBC, Fox News...etc. We don&#039;t actually have to go to the National Archive.  But it makes sense that someone who zeros in on spelling and grammar would want to attempt to appear uber-informed by name dropping the &quot;national archive.

Also, the word &quot;how&quot; is spelled H O W, not H O E.

I also doubt that your use of the &quot;Achilles Heel&quot; phrase was appropriate.  Give that an Achilles heel is defined as a fatal weakness in spite of overall strength, actually or potentially leading to downfall.  So I&#039;m not sure McCain could be that for the reason that you specified.

It really is important to bring more to the table if you want to criticize the thread participants at large.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike:</p>
<p>I take issue with your post.  Those who make the biggest issue out of spelling and grammar always seem to lack any real substance and don't inform much.  Of course we can inform ourselves fro CNN, MSDNBC, Fox News...etc. We don't actually have to go to the National Archive.  But it makes sense that someone who zeros in on spelling and grammar would want to attempt to appear uber-informed by name dropping the "national archive.</p>
<p>Also, the word "how" is spelled H O W, not H O E.</p>
<p>I also doubt that your use of the "Achilles Heel" phrase was appropriate.  Give that an Achilles heel is defined as a fatal weakness in spite of overall strength, actually or potentially leading to downfall.  So I'm not sure McCain could be that for the reason that you specified.</p>
<p>It really is important to bring more to the table if you want to criticize the thread participants at large.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thc</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-467507</link>
		<dc:creator>thc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 00:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-467507</guid>
		<description>yeah stalin and hitler running on the democratic ticket could not even dream of things these two are suggesting. but why not, neither of them live in the real world, they live in fantasy government world. plus the clinton body count isnt that high yet, what 30 some people including body guards all end up dead who were close to the clintons?
google &quot;clinton body count&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah stalin and hitler running on the democratic ticket could not even dream of things these two are suggesting. but why not, neither of them live in the real world, they live in fantasy government world. plus the clinton body count isnt that high yet, what 30 some people including body guards all end up dead who were close to the clintons?<br />
google "clinton body count"</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-467437</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 00:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-467437</guid>
		<description>Obama/Clinton?? Lets see, far left and further left?  Dems really dont want the White House do they?  Both are extreme left, dont dems ever learn?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama/Clinton?? Lets see, far left and further left?  Dems really dont want the White House do they?  Both are extreme left, dont dems ever learn?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-467406</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 00:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-467406</guid>
		<description>Obama as a VP with Clinton, what a way to distroy any chances now if people thought that was a posibility he is done-for.  He is a lot smarter than a mad dog street fighter like Clinton.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama as a VP with Clinton, what a way to distroy any chances now if people thought that was a posibility he is done-for.  He is a lot smarter than a mad dog street fighter like Clinton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-467203</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 23:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-467203</guid>
		<description>Man there is some hate going on in this thread. I love some of the comments being made, research not being done and the most heinous grammatical errors I have ever seen. Barack is spelled this way, Hillary is spelled this way and Bush is spelled this way. We love to fight over the do&#039;s and dont&#039;s of our leaders but we can&#039;t even spell their names. All of you need to read, do a little research and stop watching television. I love hoe &quot;informed&quot; decisions are being based on what CNN said today or what AOL said yesterday. If you really want to know what each candidate is about, Google the National Archives and look it up, it&#039;s all available under the &quot;open records law&quot; of our country. If anyone is concerned about the political spin of CNN, MSNBC or any of the countless others you need go no further than who owns those companies. Ted Turner for 1 has been a DNC supporter for 50 years. There was a post further back about Trent Lott taking over something or another. This is exactly what I&#039;m talking about, any informed person would know he retired about 4 months ago. And the constant bickering back and forth over who has experience, give me a break. If you people were really concerned with experience, which is what Clinton&#039;s camp seems to be riding on, you would all currently be deciding between Richardson and Biden. Wake up people and smell the coffee. This election is going to go 1 of 2 ways. It&#039;s either going to be McCain against Obama and it&#039;s going to be a tight race or it&#039;s going to be McCain against Clinton and it&#039;s going to be a blowout. Let&#039;s look at the facts. Obama is a democrat&#039;s democrat, inexperienced yes but follows party lines. With Obama you get (nearly) all the democratic vote and a large majority of the Independent vote and can pull off this election. With Clinton you get the Right leaning Democratic vote but you lose the left Democratic vote, the crossover Republican vote and the majority of the Independent vote. There is not enough disparity in numbers between the Rep party and the Dem party to make that a winnable election for her. McCain is the achilles heel because he crosses party lines and will pick up some Dem votes (as seen in this thread) as well as the Independent vote and all of the Republican vote (in all seriousness his shallow conservative stance will not keep his party from electing him over her). Now you can disagree with me all day long but the facts are the facts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man there is some hate going on in this thread. I love some of the comments being made, research not being done and the most heinous grammatical errors I have ever seen. Barack is spelled this way, Hillary is spelled this way and Bush is spelled this way. We love to fight over the do's and dont's of our leaders but we can't even spell their names. All of you need to read, do a little research and stop watching television. I love hoe "informed" decisions are being based on what CNN said today or what AOL said yesterday. If you really want to know what each candidate is about, Google the National Archives and look it up, it's all available under the "open records law" of our country. If anyone is concerned about the political spin of CNN, MSNBC or any of the countless others you need go no further than who owns those companies. Ted Turner for 1 has been a DNC supporter for 50 years. There was a post further back about Trent Lott taking over something or another. This is exactly what I'm talking about, any informed person would know he retired about 4 months ago. And the constant bickering back and forth over who has experience, give me a break. If you people were really concerned with experience, which is what Clinton's camp seems to be riding on, you would all currently be deciding between Richardson and Biden. Wake up people and smell the coffee. This election is going to go 1 of 2 ways. It's either going to be McCain against Obama and it's going to be a tight race or it's going to be McCain against Clinton and it's going to be a blowout. Let's look at the facts. Obama is a democrat's democrat, inexperienced yes but follows party lines. With Obama you get (nearly) all the democratic vote and a large majority of the Independent vote and can pull off this election. With Clinton you get the Right leaning Democratic vote but you lose the left Democratic vote, the crossover Republican vote and the majority of the Independent vote. There is not enough disparity in numbers between the Rep party and the Dem party to make that a winnable election for her. McCain is the achilles heel because he crosses party lines and will pick up some Dem votes (as seen in this thread) as well as the Independent vote and all of the Republican vote (in all seriousness his shallow conservative stance will not keep his party from electing him over her). Now you can disagree with me all day long but the facts are the facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christine</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-467120</link>
		<dc:creator>christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 23:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-467120</guid>
		<description>oh please, of course clinton, inc would say that cuz they&#039;re LOSING now.  I doubt obama would ask her to be his VP....she would try and take over the whole show from him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh please, of course clinton, inc would say that cuz they're LOSING now.  I doubt obama would ask her to be his VP....she would try and take over the whole show from him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-467079</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 23:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-467079</guid>
		<description>no more Clintons, no more Bushes!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no more Clintons, no more Bushes!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh Jorgan</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-466965</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh Jorgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 23:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-466965</guid>
		<description>McAuliffe is a fraud.  He wants to be Commerce Secretary and  will say and or do anything to get the job.  He should not be taken seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McAuliffe is a fraud.  He wants to be Commerce Secretary and  will say and or do anything to get the job.  He should not be taken seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomW</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-466962</link>
		<dc:creator>TomW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 23:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-466962</guid>
		<description>I keep seeing talk of &quot;change,&quot; &quot;hope&quot; and &quot;experience&quot; - these are just buzz words that mean nothing.

Change what, exactly? Not all change is good. Change needs to be defined somehow.

Hope in what? Just generic hope? I hope I don&#039;t get hit by a meteor? I hope this presidential candidate with NO experience won&#039;t screw up the country too bad?

Experience? PLEASE... neither of them has any experience. NEITHER. Mrs. Clinton&#039;s experience is she was married to the President. That&#039;s like letting your surgeon&#039;s wife cut open your chest because she hears him talk about it all the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I keep seeing talk of "change," "hope" and "experience" &#8211; these are just buzz words that mean nothing.</p>
<p>Change what, exactly? Not all change is good. Change needs to be defined somehow.</p>
<p>Hope in what? Just generic hope? I hope I don't get hit by a meteor? I hope this presidential candidate with NO experience won't screw up the country too bad?</p>
<p>Experience? PLEASE... neither of them has any experience. NEITHER. Mrs. Clinton's experience is she was married to the President. That's like letting your surgeon's wife cut open your chest because she hears him talk about it all the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudy C</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-466907</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudy C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 23:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-466907</guid>
		<description>Hillary (via her henchman Terry) is pretty much telling Obama: &quot;Get to the back of the bus, boy&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary (via her henchman Terry) is pretty much telling Obama: "Get to the back of the bus, boy".</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bonnie  NYC</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-466715</link>
		<dc:creator>Bonnie  NYC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 22:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-466715</guid>
		<description>Barack would have to be very deluded to ever be on a ticket with her. She would him the job of carrying her water and luggage. He is much too talented to wanted to be anywhere near those 2 frauds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barack would have to be very deluded to ever be on a ticket with her. She would him the job of carrying her water and luggage. He is much too talented to wanted to be anywhere near those 2 frauds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bonnie  NYC</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-466693</link>
		<dc:creator>Bonnie  NYC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 22:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-466693</guid>
		<description>There goes the Clinton handlers&#039; arrogance again. The Clintons are overrated and people forget all the shady things they did the last time they occupied the White House. Please free us of these 2 scourges Please....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There goes the Clinton handlers' arrogance again. The Clintons are overrated and people forget all the shady things they did the last time they occupied the White House. Please free us of these 2 scourges Please....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hard Core GOPer</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-466563</link>
		<dc:creator>Hard Core GOPer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 22:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-466563</guid>
		<description>Why would a &quot;true believer&quot; like Obama want to cover himself with all that sleaze from eights years of non-stop scandal? It&#039;s time to send a final blow to the Clinton slime machine. Vote for Barack and end it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would a "true believer" like Obama want to cover himself with all that sleaze from eights years of non-stop scandal? It's time to send a final blow to the Clinton slime machine. Vote for Barack and end it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taco32</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-466499</link>
		<dc:creator>Taco32</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 22:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-466499</guid>
		<description>Hillary = Socialist, Scheming, mess
Don&#039;t vote for someone just because of their gender

Obama = Cotton Candy, No substance, was handing out tractor licenses
a few years ago=no experience. But he wants Hope and Progress and 
Sunshine-show me something, what are we hoping for? How will you get it?
Don&#039;t vote for someone just because they speak well!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary = Socialist, Scheming, mess<br />
Don't vote for someone just because of their gender</p>
<p>Obama = Cotton Candy, No substance, was handing out tractor licenses<br />
a few years ago=no experience. But he wants Hope and Progress and<br />
Sunshine-show me something, what are we hoping for? How will you get it?<br />
Don't vote for someone just because they speak well!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MJ North Mississippi</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-466459</link>
		<dc:creator>MJ North Mississippi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 22:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-466459</guid>
		<description>Dear arains.

        The democrats lost the election after Clintons&quot; 8 years because there was no candidate except for Al Gore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear arains.</p>
<p>        The democrats lost the election after Clintons" 8 years because there was no candidate except for Al Gore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-466440</link>
		<dc:creator>G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 22:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-466440</guid>
		<description>Yahhh, I think we would sooner see a McCain/Obama ticket before we see a Clinton/Obama ticket.  NO worries, though.  Looks like this race is going to kill, or at least incapacitate Hillary and Obama will be the nominee.  Hillary can&#039;t stop crying or coughing.  What next, uncontrollable vomiting?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahhh, I think we would sooner see a McCain/Obama ticket before we see a Clinton/Obama ticket.  NO worries, though.  Looks like this race is going to kill, or at least incapacitate Hillary and Obama will be the nominee.  Hillary can't stop crying or coughing.  What next, uncontrollable vomiting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-466419</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 22:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-466419</guid>
		<description>Hey Media,

How is it that during the last presidential election military experience was the most important issue of the day?  Millions were spent by 527&#039;s to destroy John Kerry, and Dan Rather gave up his career y being caught red handed forcing false documents on the public aimed at George Bush. ( Geez Dan, nobody on your crack staff realized they didn&#039;t have laser printers 30 years ago?)  All we heard was military, military, military.  Yet now, no one ever mentions the word.  Gee, I wonder why?  &quot;Uh, Senator Obama, can you tell us about your experiences during the war?  Uh, ok well Senator Clinton, maybe you can tell us what you did during the Tet offensive?&quot;   This can not be buried forever, beleive me  McCain will be polishing his medals with Hillary&#039;s scarf in no time flat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Media,</p>
<p>How is it that during the last presidential election military experience was the most important issue of the day?  Millions were spent by 527's to destroy John Kerry, and Dan Rather gave up his career y being caught red handed forcing false documents on the public aimed at George Bush. ( Geez Dan, nobody on your crack staff realized they didn't have laser printers 30 years ago?)  All we heard was military, military, military.  Yet now, no one ever mentions the word.  Gee, I wonder why?  "Uh, Senator Obama, can you tell us about your experiences during the war?  Uh, ok well Senator Clinton, maybe you can tell us what you did during the Tet offensive?"   This can not be buried forever, beleive me  McCain will be polishing his medals with Hillary's scarf in no time flat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-466047</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 21:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-466047</guid>
		<description>We would expect nothing less from some political hack who is still on the Clinton payroll.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We would expect nothing less from some political hack who is still on the Clinton payroll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Please.</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-465787</link>
		<dc:creator>Please.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 21:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-465787</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s like if last week they asked Eli to be Brady&#039;s backup.  I don&#039;t think so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's like if last week they asked Eli to be Brady's backup.  I don't think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam S</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-465741</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 21:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/clinton-chairman-obama-would-be-good-running-mate/#comment-465741</guid>
		<description>So, the Hillary campaign does not think Obama is ready to be president, but he can be a vice president???? 

Now, if something were to happen to President Rodham-Clinton, it would be okay to have this man, who is not ready to be presdent, become President?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, the Hillary campaign does not think Obama is ready to be president, but he can be a vice president???? </p>
<p>Now, if something were to happen to President Rodham-Clinton, it would be okay to have this man, who is not ready to be presdent, become President?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
