February 5, 2008
Posted: 03:53 PM ET
CNN Anchor Wolf Blitzer.
CNN Anchor Wolf Blitzer.

NEW YORK (CNN) — These very long nights happen every few years. I remember staying up all night in November 2000, wondering out loud on television whether George W. Bush or Al Gore would be the next President. We anchored our coverage that night from the CNN Center in Atlanta. And the next day, I flew to Tallahassee to cover the Florida recount.

Four years later, it was an all-nighter as we watched the results come in, and wondered whether Bush or John Kerry would be the winner. Kerry conceded the next day. We anchored our coverage that night from the NASDAQ headquarters in New York. It was the first time we took advantage of those huge video walls which have since become a hallmark of our CNN coverage.

In 2006, we brought our new generation of video walls to the CNN studios at the Time Warner Center in New York. It was another long night as we saw the Democrats become the majority in both the House and Senate. We took our political coverage to a new level that night.

And now we get ready for what I suspect will be another long night of election coverage.

People are always asking me: How do you prepare for this? My answer is simple. I am always preparing — every single day. I do my homework. I have discovered over the years that if you know your stuff, you will be prepared.

But there is also the matter of preparing physically for what will be a very long night. People always ask me about that. Don’t you get tired? The answer is that I am too pumped up to get tired. Still, I work hard at being ready. The night before, I always get a good night’s sleep. I exercise in the morning. It’s always a great way to start the day. I ran five miles this morning – as I try to do every morning. I eat a healthy breakfast. And the rest falls into place.

— CNN Anchor Wolf Blitzer

Filed under: Wolf Blitzer


Belinda   February 12th, 2008 7:58 pm ET

WOW!! Just got into running….I admire your 5 mile run!! No wonder you look so good ….. Bravo!! Hope CNN realises how valuable you are.

RFD   February 6th, 2008 4:21 pm ET

I would like to see an analysis comparing red and blue states in the last presidential election to the projected red and blue states this year. Along with that I'd like to see a comparison of those states to those each candidate seemed to "win" in the primary this year. Using those results, which candidate won the "right states" to win the election. For example, McCain won both New York and California in the primary but is unlikely to win those in the presidential election. Even though winning these states helps him get the nomination they will not help him in the general election. I think this analysis would be very helpful in picking the right candidate at the convention. What do you think?

rfd

BETTINA RIVER FOREST il   February 6th, 2008 4:09 pm ET

Obama won!
Clinton has shrunk back to her base.
With more time Obama will take that too

Roberta   February 6th, 2008 3:14 pm ET

Wolf: I love the situation room and your coverge of the elections is first rate. However, could you please inform your miriad of political experts that there is only one "n" in pundits. If I hear another one of them say "pundints" I am going to have to jump off a bridge!

designisverb   February 6th, 2008 2:53 pm ET

CNN…. you really really really disappointed me last night. Your projections were not properly justified. Your analysts were not balanced. The whole thing was all annoying graphics, well designed, by annoying ….sexist and racially dividing commentary.

I'm a political news junkie. But your tactics and sensational reporting only makes you look as bad as Fox News, and I'm a liberal. Liberal Media-schmedia!! I think you have really done it this time… You finally lost me as a viewer.

fair   February 6th, 2008 2:14 pm ET

You can not say that BO is perfect. Only baby is perfect, since they never made any decision. Human learn from his/her mistakes. That is called experience. Some drug user learned to stay away from drugs, that is why they say they "experiementing drug".

I bid HC will learn from her own mistakes, too. So that she knows this time she will need to work with everyone. Do you allow you make mistake yourself? Why not others?

I didn't like HC defended BC back few years ago. But on the other hand, I admired her for she staying with BC. It would a very easy for she to walk away from that marriage. But she choosen to stay. Right now, we have a big question for every voters: Why are you voting? For yourself or for the country? If someone can imitate JFK, it is the time to remember what can you do for your country!

Anybody has dirt on himself. To be a leader, it is the view to the future, not look how many dirty cloth in the washing machine. Pity to many of those demo gods who jump for their own interest, or their party's interest, not for this great land.

Danny   February 6th, 2008 1:54 pm ET

I have wondered this, asked but never been answered, why does the media want Obama to win? What has he done for them that Hillary hasn't? Is it just because he is black? Lets be honest when it comes to Men voting…men will stick with Gender first…White women seem to stick with race and back women stick with race. If all things were equal and it was two men a white and a black you would see the split basically down the middle! Is this right, maybe not, but is this a fact, yes it is. Who is best for the country, I guess it is through who's eyes you are looking.

BlackHouse   February 6th, 2008 12:47 pm ET

Thanks CNN for being on the people's side!

BlackHouse   February 6th, 2008 12:45 pm ET

No justice no peace!
We will not rest till we take the WhiteHouse!

George Centeno   February 6th, 2008 12:32 pm ET

Viva Hillary after eight years of bad advise,Rice,Rove,Powell etc.I will take PRESIDENT Bill Clintons advise to President Hillary any time.

Mac Mac   February 6th, 2008 12:28 pm ET

Wolf keep up on pounding on Hillary
GOP owes you a lot of gratitude.

Wolf and Obama the Best Ticket for GOP

GC   February 6th, 2008 11:25 am ET

Wolf….If last night didn't show you and CNN, it definately showed America, that Hillary Clinton is who we want for President. While McCain lies and cheats his way to the Republican nomination, and Huckabee steals votes from the used car salesman, Romney, we are reminded of the past eight years under Republican rule. No holds barred from the Republicans. Destroy your opponent, regardless of truth.
And no matter what anyone thinks, Senator Obama, whether knowingly or not, has helped show that Black Americans are definately more racist than any other Americans. Clinton and Obama literally split the white male vote, while Obama took 80%+ of the African American vote. If that isn't racism, I don't know what is.
In my opinion, and after last night's results, the opinion of the MAJORITY of Americans. Hillary Clinton is the best possible person to lead our country out of doom. And I hope you and CNN will start reporting not distorting facts.

wasim   February 6th, 2008 10:51 am ET

Lets see,how many people in this country can understand the delegate and super-delegate difference and how it works,i am thinking even the candidates no idea about it! Wolf, you and your political team should explain this and educate us more please!
Last night Obama 's speech,i saw many people tearing-up! One beautiful white girl was teared-up when Obama was talking about being volunteer in Chicago and helping kids with no guidelines! I became emotional too and i am hoping Obama will do what he is promising to do when he becomes the president,if he does not then American will never trust anyone talking about change.
CNN is the best source of news where things are fair and balanced and that is why most of the world watches CNN. Larry,Wolf,Anderson,Johns King and Robert are the best! Most of us in America do not know much about the rest of the world,CNN can do a better job bringing more news and general knowledge about the world so we can learn more about the world. Thanks a lot!

ani   February 6th, 2008 10:50 am ET

how about race, which you are playing hard on Spanish voter for Hillary 87 percent of black vote went to Obama for change. Clinton has more character than Kenedy.

Darlene   February 6th, 2008 10:33 am ET

Wolf, very poor reporting by you and the CNN pundits. It was a sad night when male political candidates were called by their names, and the female candidate was constantly referred to as "She." This is proof positive that, "There are two kinds of people in this world: Human beings and women." I should have watched Fox News.

s smith   February 6th, 2008 9:48 am ET

I can't recall ever being this excited about an election. I am with you Wolf. But, get come sleep some time. You all are appreciated, even if you make mistakes at times.

Lilia   February 6th, 2008 9:11 am ET

Dabeth, excellent comment and right on!

I am from Latin America and I started watching the coverage in CNNI last night, I knew Clinton was strong when I saw everyone's faces and demeanor in the broadcast. Gloomy. I can clearly remember their demeanor with the South Carolina primary! It was appaling. Especially the ladies, Suzanne Malvaux and the Gloria lady predicting that Hillary would come in third. They were relishing Clinton's defeat…almost salivating!

From what I have been following, last night, Mrs. Clinton achieved what she set out to do which was to win the big states. She knew and knows that she doesn't have as many resources as Obama has financially or with high profile endorsements. It´s funny …when you see Obama campaigning and talking about not only changing America BUT THE WORLD!!!! he is on some pulpit with people just screaming.
Mrs. Clinton is WITH THE PEOPLE, you see her more connected. Obama is riding a huge ego trip and last night he looked flustered, angry and frustrated because the knock out blow would have been to take either MA or NJ or CA from her. HE COULDN't and no matter how many states he won, he couldn´t achieve what all the polls were saying he would achieve. I would really like to like him, BUT I don't trust him or his ambition which is, sorry to say, unmeasured.

DaBeth Manns   February 6th, 2008 8:20 am ET

Why should I vote for someone on the basis of what he says he would not have done?

Senator Obama claims he would not have supported the legislation to conduct a fact-finding mission and/or authorize war, but, he never says what he would have done (or how he would have handled it). His supporters should demand an answer. Were not he and his constituency in Illinois also affected by the 09/11/01 bombings and did not he react strongly in 2001?

Too, in the midst of self-righteous pontifications about how he would have exercised such 'good judgment' about the 9/11 attacks and the decision to go to war, he promptly accepts major endorsements from Senators and House of Representative members, who voted for the legislation to conduct a fact-finding mission and/or authorize the war. I am of the opinion that he is more concerned about winning the Presidency than about leading with courage and conviction.

Senator Clinton gets my vote.

KB   February 6th, 2008 8:15 am ET

OOoooooowwwwwwwwwwWWWW Call of the Wolf!

tigerjcs   February 6th, 2008 8:11 am ET

Thank you Wolfe. Providing balance news and facts.

Way to go, Hillary! California love you!. And we all love you. You are the stronger and tough candidate with substance who has presented clear and detail plans for implementation of CHANGE. Obama is full of empty talk.

Mike   February 6th, 2008 7:36 am ET

I have a question for wolf, Does Affirmative action work in Elections ? Were a Minority is running again Majority. It works every where else in our system.

thank you
Mike

Mark Wiggins   February 6th, 2008 5:37 am ET

Wolf Blitzer is the most impartial, respected, excellent and irreproachable political commentator in the world today….and he has been for many years.

His particular genius, in my view, is the way he acts as an intermediary in presenting the most persuasive of the opposing views by either video or verbal recitation of the written record, and then permitting his studio guests fair right of reply.

In the marketplace of ideas, Wolf is an honest broker. But he is far more also. His spontaneous critical faculties rarely miss the key follow up questions needed to probe holes in the countervailing arguments.

Wolf is as equally respected by both sides of the political divide as by his global television audience.

Politicians would like the facts to NOT get in the way of a good story. Wolf makes the facts the story in a way that is both entertaining and educational.

And finally, his intellectual firepower is coupled with a humility that clearly brings out the best in the CNN team. You can tell they love working with him. Who wouldn't? Thanks Wolf.

D   February 6th, 2008 5:29 am ET

I am personally VERY SHOCKED at the obviously blantant sexism I saw while sitting up all night watching CNN…
Every time Obama won a state, it was HUGE PRAISE and tons of too heaped on him ..
when Hillary won , they tried to figure out WHY she won and what it meant to Obama, and the CAST of "pundits" seemed to get more and more caught up in it as the night went on…..
I also noticed …that when Hillary was leading in a state, CNN and the powers that be, wouldnt call it for HILLARY until it was over 60 sometimes 70 percent, and they would say ITS BECAUSE IT WAS JUST TOO CLOSE … But once the votes were actually IN … She beat Obama handily …But they would call an OBAMA win alot faster and PRAISE AND PRAISE and spend lots of time on him …
The only people I noticed who tried to keep the folks away from that was LOU DOBBS and ANDERSON COOPER …
Please guys.. I know some of you cant stand the IDEA of a FEMALE president , but please …..keep it to yourselves …….. it was SHOWING BAD last night … very BAD …….
I love my PARTY and will support whoever wins my PARTY …
But please be FAIR "GENTLEMEN" and keep your personal ideas and feelings at HOME ….
I watched this go on AND on on FOX … but we all EXPECT it from them … NOT CNN…

Laurie   February 6th, 2008 4:05 am ET

Dear Mr. Blitzer,

I have always marveled at your energy, enthusiasm, and expertise. You are a fabulous and professional journalist. Many thanks.

Laurie

Canada

Hannah Waldhorn   February 6th, 2008 3:31 am ET

i am a non-partisan voter registered in California… i just read an article on the msnbc website that obama was worried that non-partisan voters in this state were not given the option to vote for the democratic candidate in certain counties, even though they are entitled that vote. i knew that i was supposed to be able to vote for the democratic candidate, but the option was not included on the page of non-partisan issues and i ended up giving my ballot over without voting, i was going to vote for obama. afterwards i found out that i could have, but it was never made clear to me before hand. i am in los angeles and that is one of the counties msnbc said may be affected, i knew i could have been the only one to be confused. when i read that article i was so angry because it said the clinton representatives were saying that this was just obamas way to complain, but i am angry i didnt get to cast my vote and cant imagine that i was the only one to make the mistake!!! i dont know who to talk to about this but i want someone to know… TELL EVERYONE please.

Maria   February 6th, 2008 2:14 am ET

Once again, there was a clear demonstration of media spin for Obama.
Out of 9 states where Obama had huge advantage, 6 were won in tiny caucuses. This was mentioned throughout the night but the scale and proportion of this was never put clearly forward. Of course, if Hillary was the one to win this way, it would have been huge hoo-la-la. Furthermore, out of 9 states with decisive support for Obama (total 64 delegates in November), 7 are decisively republican (UT,Alaska,ID,KS,ND,AL,GA). Those states vote republican in general election, and independents in those states are likely to vote for McCain. So much for "the best candidate to beat McCain".

omnath   February 6th, 2008 2:02 am ET

Have been following the election center for a month or so. According to me the team is totally unbiased and professional. No wonder it is projected as the "Best political team on television". Lou Dobbs tops the list with his indepth analysis & expert comments on the core issues which is grappling the entire nation and followed by wolf (happening now ) and anderson cooper (AC360).

Keep up the good work. Look forward to your continued quality coverage on super tuesday results & analysis !

Hope the super tuesday coverage brings more hits to your blog than Jack Cafferty's blog :)

Chet Bright   February 6th, 2008 1:43 am ET

Wolf,

I think Gloria and David both hit the mark when they alluded to John McCain's arrogant attitude about his being "above reproach" with a "Holyier than thou" attitude that he can do no wrong. It's very reminiscent of the McCarthy era where he makes these off the wall comments that no one seems to challenge, or if they do, then he attacks them as "unpatriotic." He tries to instill fear into the American people about a war that he is so personally immersed in, that he can't see straight. This man scares the hell out of me…and I will never vote for him.

otto   February 6th, 2008 1:39 am ET

The one good thing about tonite is that McCain looks like he will take the republican nomination and this gives me a choice if the Clinton's get nominated. We may be able to break the chain of Bushs and Clintons in the white house

Jane Clemons   February 6th, 2008 1:18 am ET

It appears Obama tends to win in those weird caucus states where everyone does not get to vote, or can trade votes or vote twice. Clinton seems to win in primary states where you can vote all day and everyone has the opportunity to vote. Do you realize this and just don't talk about it? We all know you guys prefer Obama. That;s a shame.

Karen, California   February 6th, 2008 1:18 am ET

Thanks for the reporting, but as a Democrat, I am very disappointed that you seem to be biased to Obama. For the first few hours tonight, I never saw Hillary's face boxes by the states she had won but saw a lot of Obama's….now we have NY and CA in….when are you going to project the delegates vs. the state counts? Aren't we smart enought to understand this makes a difference?? You in the media are trying to influence the people's votes by the way you are reporting.

tomdavie   February 6th, 2008 1:12 am ET

Wolf.

You are great. But CNN is biasing Obama badly. He is a corporate puppet. Bought and paid for by the media.

I wonder how oprah feels about california now? Stumping to sway WOMENS VOTES?

She now has go face her audience , whom many are going to be RIGHTEOUSLY pissed right off.

Mary G   February 6th, 2008 1:06 am ET

Thanks for reporting fairly. CNN has done a great job overall on this Super Tuesday. But unfortunately now on the Larry King segment Carl Bernstein is on and I have had to change station.
We were talking today at work about what station most will watch. I was so surprised how so many said CNN till he comes on.
My feeling is the job is to report on info etc. Not campain against an a candidate for your own reasons!!!

PAUL   February 6th, 2008 12:55 am ET

I have been watching CNN all year and keep hearing about the best political team on television. Tonight you blew it Mr Blitzer. Fox network had Hillary winning Arizona a good 1/2 hour before you. They had McCain winning California a good ten minutes before you and when you were saying that California was to close to call for the Democrats and it looked like a long night Fox projected Hillary as the winner.
Please explain this to the people who believe that you are the best in the business like myself. If you are to timid to call a race then please don't lie to us about the best political team on television. Please don't let me change channels just to see who wins so I don't have to wait. You people dropped the ball tonight and you need to pick it up and run with it. Paul

Ruth G. Harmon   February 6th, 2008 12:50 am ET

I read the other comments before I posted my comment. What planet are some of these guys living on? Maybe MSNBC and Fox spend all night posting negatives instead of doing their "homework." I've watched CNN since your beginning and have continued because you provide the best and latest news WITHOUT bias. Wolf, you are the best of the best. Thanks for your hard work and for your honest coverage.

Antonia Corby   February 6th, 2008 12:47 am ET

I am a political junky and as such I am sitting in front of the TV enjoying your show. I am desapointed at the lack of respect shown by one of your commentators whenhe rfers to Hillary Clinton as "The Clintons". I have noticed that the gentleman is bias but I find his to be a put down of Hillary Clinton because she is a woman. When you get too old to keep up with times one should have the courage to bow out.

Regards and keep up yhe good work otherwise.

Antonia

pivoine   February 6th, 2008 12:46 am ET

I am as impressed by the stamina of the reporters as by the stamina of the candidates. I have been watching CNN throughout the day, indeed most of the last few days, and the anchors and reporters and commentators always look fresh, sound articulate and remain enthusiastic. I congratulate everyone on the smoothness of this coverage. Thank you Wolf & co.

Ruth G. Harmon   February 6th, 2008 12:44 am ET

Wolf, as always, you are the best. Thank you for doing your homework. It shows in the great coverage tonight.

araya   February 6th, 2008 12:38 am ET

You doing a wonderful job man
God bless you

Eric   February 6th, 2008 12:30 am ET

And Wolf continues to say 'PERjected' and not 'PROjected' .. that continued grammatical mispronunciation is frustrating - it's disappointing that Wolf, who earns his paycheck by speaking, CONTINUES to mispronounce this word.

Very distracting - I'm turning off CNN and will read the websites to keep up with results.

Morris Maron   February 6th, 2008 12:25 am ET

As a Canadian vitally interested in what happens in the US, I have been watcing CNN throughout the primary season. I consider myself a Democrat and would be happy with either Senator Clinton or Obama as the party nominee. What I have noticed this evening in your coverage is a certain bias in the reporting in favour of Senator Obama. Nuances in how you portray videos of their wins, the fact that Obama's name always precedes that of Clinton's and other similar instances. I am disappointed in this lack of professionalism on your part.
Thank you.

Hal   February 6th, 2008 12:20 am ET

Great Blitzer, thanks for being fair and balance.

Go Obama, "out with the old politics and in with the new politics" Guys. Republicans hopping that Hillary wins because they have lots of baggage on her during the Clinton era, if Obama wins it will be a very great battle against the republicans indeed.

elaine   February 5th, 2008 11:54 pm ET

Mr. Blitzer, I respect you, and realize that you work very hard now, and have worked hard through-out your career; but you are rather transparent and bias (in my opinion) I lost some respect for CNN after the debate on Jan. 31, 2008.
You had the "can't help it" transparency. Just thought I'd let you know, for whatever it's worth.

Lawrence   February 5th, 2008 11:51 pm ET

Keep up the good work Wolf!

suzy   February 5th, 2008 11:22 pm ET

I believe the primaries are about voting for who you believe to be the best candidate so of course I had to vote for John Edwards.

Deborah   February 5th, 2008 11:10 pm ET

Please do not liken tonight to the days/nights when the Bushes stole two presidential elections in 2000 and 2004. That makes no sense.

Wolf, you are a spectacular human being. I only wish that I could someday touch your shoes. I would be so elevated by that action.

Wolf, try a little humility. You are not all that!

Angela   February 5th, 2008 10:56 pm ET

Wolf,

I love watching the Situation Room and I'm staying up with you all night tonight !!!!

Go Hillary!

Billy   February 5th, 2008 10:52 pm ET

February 5, 2008 4:01 pm ET

This doesn't have to be a long night. I can give you CNN's results right now:

If Clinton gets the popular vote and looses the delegates, Obama wins.
If Clinton looses the popular vote and gets the delegates, Obama wins.
If Clinton wins the popular vote and wins the delegates, Obama wins.
Ditto for me also…………….. PS..Wolfs got alheimers or ammaneshia..better get it checked out Wolf….I hate to have to start watching the Faux network

Deb Hanes   February 5th, 2008 10:16 pm ET

Jjust a little sick of CNN stuffing Obama down our throats.

If he is meant to win her will.. we do not need you to choose for us.

Thought CNN was better than Fox.. I was wrong.

Ivy   February 5th, 2008 9:44 pm ET

We love CNN, including Wolf Blitzer, but, are having to watch some of the election results on C-SPAN because CNN isn't showing all of the results which include the candidates who are no longer in the race. It is interesting to many of us to see how people voted in it's entirety, whether the candidate is still in the race or not, and, also to see the actual number of votes. Thank you.

Teresa   February 5th, 2008 9:44 pm ET

I agree, the stock market fell again today, I believe because of the Primaries. It will be interesting to see what happens tomorrow seeing as Hillary is doing very well.'
Go Hillary,

Stephanie   February 5th, 2008 9:34 pm ET

Wolf, it is a shame that when Obama was projected the winner of AL, you definitely took a deep sigh? Were you disappointed? Were is your political objectiveness? Are you able to be objective? By the way, how could CNN & the media declare Hillary the winner of NY, with 0% percent of the vote in? I am a college educated woman, and yet this is nonsensical to me!!!!

Joan Perry   February 5th, 2008 9:20 pm ET

People need to stop and think about what this race means. Before the Bush admin took office there was a booming economy, no war, jobs were up and crime was down, now look at the mess the country is in. But you can thank the people who put him into office. So the next time you hear about another life lost, another job gone down the tubes, another crime spree, or the recession, thank a republican!

Brian Loftus   February 5th, 2008 9:06 pm ET

will someone please tell Wolf that the word is "Project", not "Preject. thx, BJL

Charles Stoy   February 5th, 2008 9:03 pm ET

Colorado is a caucus state. Not a primary state.

Bruce Waters   February 5th, 2008 8:57 pm ET

Hey, The Horserace coverage is great, but could you slip in some information?
My question is: What votes will the Candidate/Senators face before the general election? Have any of them taken a stand? We need leadership BEFORE November. The Bush Deficit Budget, the Permanent Bases without Treaties, and Tax Rebates, to name a few Urgent Legislative Measures.

KJ   February 5th, 2008 8:51 pm ET

I don't understand how the heck CNN or anyone for that matter can declare a winner when there is only 0% of the votes in! That is ridiculous and I would think poor journalism only to want to be the first to get the word out. Remember years ago when some broadcast company projected a winner when in fact it wasn't FACT! Can you explain this?

Cheryl Miller   February 5th, 2008 8:44 pm ET

Being First Lady is not experience in my book. If that was the case I'm qualified to be a General because I was with my husband giving patties to big wigs, and on several commites during his 21 year career in the Air Force. So if you eliminate that expierience she is in her 8th year as a US Senator. Barack Obama has 8 years as a State Senator and is in his 4th year as a US Senator.

Cheryl Miller   February 5th, 2008 8:35 pm ET

I vote on the issues not race, gender, party or age. I know this was not part of your question but I just heard one of the super delegates say he has pledge to Hillary Clinton before the votes are even counted ,and he would not change his mind because he made a commitment. He should remember his first commitment is to the people of his state. It is a shame for the first time in history we have people interested in Democracy and actually voting in record numbers, many are first time voters. We preach to other countries about Democracy now it's time to prove it. So I strongly urge the super delegates to remember the constitution For the people by the people, so for once do what the majority of the people in your state say to do. I believe our For Fathers never intended for our president to be elected behind closed doors. If this happens I hope someones challenges this constitutionally. And everybody speaks up and takes our country back.

Cheryl

wallace colligan   February 5th, 2008 8:33 pm ET

wolf with all the problems this country has domestic and overseas what are these wacky carefree unconcerned people thinking about voting for a guy with no military ,governing background ,and foreign relations of any sorts talk about some flying the airplane thats never been in one wow goes to show you that this country is in a deep sleep and better wake up asap we are literately giving away our country our jobs our souls we do not need another know it all give away guy like obama at this critical time of our country . why don't you ask them real questions on their background , time in service ,overall experience . ,thank you

Jeffrey, Salt Lake City, Utah   February 5th, 2008 8:33 pm ET

I thought today was about America and the future of our country, not about Wolf Blitzer. Turns out I was wrong. Good to know.

Scott   February 5th, 2008 8:26 pm ET

Wolf:

Obama does not have the experience for the job. And he's smug.
After 7 years going on 8 with a smug President, I can't bear the thought of another
"smug" face looking at me from Washington.

But this will all come out in the results, won't it?

by the way - I bet on the Giants! …..and I'm betting on Hillary!

matt childs   February 5th, 2008 8:25 pm ET

Your analysts continue to make the point tonight that Obama has gained considerable ground because he has picked up so much more of the white male vote in georgia than he got in south carolina. Folks, the south is not one homogenous pot of people. Those who live in the south understand that there are HUGE differences in the demographics, cultures, etc in South Carolina vs. Georgia. Georgia, because of the influence of metropolitan Atlanta, is much more cosmopolitan and progressive than south carolina. Except for the fact that the two states are located adjacent to one another on the map, there is not that much similarity. Please…..add some nuance to your reporting. You guys should be better than that.

JEAN   February 5th, 2008 8:22 pm ET

for Mr. Bill Bennett -

CT is the wealthiest state in the country - hence the change in voting ………..

Mary   February 5th, 2008 8:11 pm ET

Well an hour into the "best political team on television" and the Hillary
hate continues at it's fullest.
Would it be so difficult to cover this thing objectively ?
Apparently not.

Barbara   February 5th, 2008 8:09 pm ET

Why is CNN not calling Tennesse? Are they trying to influence the Western states before the polls close? Fox shows Hillary 78% to a very low 3% Obama. I am getting exhausted by the media trying to influence the elections.

David   February 5th, 2008 8:02 pm ET

How many times did you have to announce your blog on the air tonight? We get it, you blog. How cutting edge!

shelly in NH   February 5th, 2008 7:55 pm ET

I'm sick of you saying north eastern people are not going to vote for a black president. Most of NH is white and Clinton almost lost. So we are not against a black candidate. My husband and I both voted for Obama and love him. Stop saying negative things about us. Your opininion is unfair and in-accurate.
Clinton only won by 2%. Go Obama!

Theresa   February 5th, 2008 7:49 pm ET

I wish that your coverage of Hillary Clinton was more fair than it is. It seems as though the Media is gang up on Hillary because she is a strong woman. Why do you hate her so much?

Independent007   February 5th, 2008 7:43 pm ET

I read and watch a lot of news, domestic and international. I search for different news centers for a variety of information. I think Wolf does a good job. I'm angered by the posts decrying this short article and what he does to prepare for a long day. I believe the title of the article was self-explainatory. If you don't want the information, it's simple not to click the link. I do not believe he is overly bias in his reporting as compared to other news casters. Human beings have a strong urge to imprint their own motivations on other people. This explains some of the other posts that are present. Wolf: I for one found this brief repast was an interesting insight into what journalists in your position do to prepare for your chosen carrer. Keep up the good work.

David McDougal   February 5th, 2008 7:39 pm ET

CNN your the best to watch the results on the voting BUT why does the media and especially CNN report the winner with NO or Less than 1% of the vote in–this is wrong. The American people throughout the country deserves better coverage .

Terry S   February 5th, 2008 7:39 pm ET

You and Lou are THE BEST!

Keep up the good work!

Matt Parrott   February 5th, 2008 7:32 pm ET

This is obviously a build-up to a series of informercials selling fitness and wellness tapes featuring Wolf Blitzer himself. Watch out Tony Little and Richard Simmons!

This man has already run more miles, lobbied for more anti-American interest groups, and eaten more fiber by the time I wake up in the morning than I can keep up with my entire day!

Kevin   February 5th, 2008 7:29 pm ET

I really appreciate your dedication to the news and the all-night coverage. I'm glad to know that you prepare with exercise and a healthy breakfast. Who'd have thought that you ran so much? Good to know. It's an example to us all.

I hope you're not deprived of food all night though. To go that long without anything would be awful. You could always hand it off back and forth between you and Lou. He's more than capable.

R Patel   February 5th, 2008 7:29 pm ET

Let me start by saying I'm neither black nor white, I'm Asian….and not Chinese or Oriental, I'm Indian. I say this because somehow the media/news/politicians seem to forget about our demographic - all Asians.

It seems as though Obama is winning in deep south states - something that we didn't think would be possible a few years ago.

My Question:

If Obama wins the Democratic nomination, do you think that we will see a huge divide in the Republican/Democratic votes along black/white votes? (No need to worry about including us in your equation, we're use to it)

WOLF, we have a problem!!   February 5th, 2008 7:23 pm ET

WOLF,
I thought reporters were supoosed to keep their personnal opinions to themselves. A good reporter does. You are all about OBAMA and that makes you prejudiced. HILLARY is the one for 09′ you need to start learning more about the next president instead of reporting on the MAN that could never be president!!

Prakaithip   February 5th, 2008 7:22 pm ET

On The Job Training is NOT ACCEPTABLE. Not now, not ever for President… it's too risky folks. Look what happened with Bush. Clearly, Kerry had more experience. Wakeup.

Scotland   February 5th, 2008 7:18 pm ET

This is the most interesting election in years. I went to an Obama rally the other night and they were speaking about how the world is watching and anticipating Obama becoming the next president of the United States. What we gain from this is someone who represents a type of Tiger Woods appeal to a larger audience. Obama's level of appeal and his ability to convene in a sense, different cultures keeps the election very interesting. I have never seen so many people engaged in the election process. It is like being a child and wanting to stay up for Saturday Night Live.

More important than that, we have an opportunity to stand up to the challenge of our Constitution and vote according to the principles that the Constitution was founded upon.

This long awaited scenario deserves every ounce of attention from the people of the United States. It is something I hope marks the beginning of what we will see much more often in our political process- real challenges to put to the test our political leaders, our beliefs as citizens, and ownership of the diversity of our nation.

gerald bryant   February 5th, 2008 7:11 pm ET

I am a Canadian citizen and I have never before in my lifetime watched a US election campaign with any particular interest. Why this time, I don't really know. Considering that there are only two parties (Republican and Democrate) I believe that there cannot be any political system in the world more complicated than the election method used in the United States. Not surprising that many American citizens don't bother to vote.

Lisa   February 5th, 2008 7:10 pm ET

Hi Wolf,
Enjoy your show. This is the most interesting election since I have been able to vote. This is the way it should be. Young people, old people, Rep. and Dem. are motivated to get the vote out. It's great to see so many people voting. I wish the N.C. primary was today.

Geetha Bahi Pillai   February 5th, 2008 7:09 pm ET

Dear Wolf Blitzer,

Oprah Winfrey mentionaed that she is choosing Obama because he is brilliant. I hope the most brilliant AND the most experienced person wins the demaocartic race, i.e. Hillary Clinton. Oprah said that people called her 'LOW' for choosing Obama because of his race, and she defiantly said that she was not 'LOW'. She is indeed a very low person for having spent millions of dollars for a luxurious school in South African when she knows pretty well that the American schools which has a majority of African Americans are so badly damaged. If she was a brilliant woman or a person with 'High or Great character, she would have given that money to those American schools who so badly need the funding. Shame on her!

neclark   February 5th, 2008 7:00 pm ET

…yeah…right…

It was all that "preparation" which caused Wolf to lose control so early during the last Democratic debate in which John Edwards was present (but hardly allowed to be a full participant). Control which he never regained to even pretend to give equal time to Edwards' truly Progressive ideas.

That cluster-_uck was emblematic of the media's intentional marginalization of Edwards - the one candidate they presumable feared because he wasn't a "media darling" (they had & have plenty of time to lavish on Republican non-starters like Fred Thompson, and leader-of-the-back Ron Paul). The denial of fair time almost certainly contributed to Edwards' untimely withdrawal from the campaign.

wasim   February 5th, 2008 6:54 pm ET

First of all,i watch your program religiously even i am not a religious person.I learn something new everyday from you,job well done!
Today could be the history making,either Hillary or Obama,if not we will witness the history soon. I will be voting first time in my life this coming November,i will be voting for the person who will be better for the America and the world.
Would you explain the difference between a caucus and primary, who are the delegates,who are the super-delegates and how this delegate system works for both Democrats and Republicans,why not use the popular vote? I am watching your program right now,i will wait for your explanation! CNN is the fair and balanced news-network.
Sincerely,
wasim

Andrew   February 5th, 2008 6:52 pm ET

Hello everyone,

I was checking up on cnn.com to check on the election results from today, and while doing so, came across this blog.
This is my first time ever writing in response to a blog, and in reading all the replies posted here, it's quite fascinating to see all the rhetoric and high spirits reflected in people's posts.
Since this is available, here's my two (or few) cents, whatever it's worth…

1. I think people are taking Wolf's initial post a little too seriously. It's a blog, and from what I understand, blogs are supposed to be some kind of online journal. It's not the main news site - for that, just go back to the main page. Besides, most of the returns have not come in yet, and there isn't much to comment on except for the situation in WV, which seems like will require some research.
2. I agree that reporting on CNN has been biased in favor of some candidates on some days, in favor of different candidates on others. I expect that CNN is simply "playing the angles" to present the most "interesting" story, which will generate the most viewership, while trying to maintain some modicum of journalistic integrity. Thus, the different "reporters" and commentators that have been coming out are all trying to present some fresh angle. It's much like the two weeks before the Superbowl - every possible human interest angle and question was asked and presented, until it bordered on the ridiculous. And like the past Superbowl, it'll be interesting to see the actual final outcome, which will stand on its own - biased reporting or not.
3. The more recent debates have been somewhat disappointing to me as well. It seems that the "no rules" debates have been a lot of wasted time to hear the candidates repeat everything that they have been saying repeatedly already. There needs to be more structured and nuanced debate, rather than trying to stoke controversy and unnecessary bitter rhetoric between the candidates. The time given to the different candidates to speak and clarify their positions and give some detail to their plans has been really unfair and marginalized as well.
For example, in the Republican debate at the Regan Library, Ron Paul (who I really do not support at all) was given little, to no time, to speak at all. Mike Huckabee (who presents some interesting ideas and speaks well) was marginalized, seemingly in favor of stoking the harsh rhetoric between McCain and Romney.
During the Democratic debate, at the Kodak Center as well as at the African American Congressional Caucus, John Edwards was marginalized often (albeit not as much as Paul and Huckabee were), in favor of the fierce and nasty rhetoric between Clinton and Obama.
For me personally, I would really like to have some more detail drawn out by the CNN (and other news network) reporters from the candidates. I would like to know how a "fair tax" would play out and how it would sustain the economy. I would like to know what McCain's "long record" of economic success is. I would like to know how Romney sees international relations outside of Iraq - very little discussion outside of Iraq and AlQaeda and fleeting mention of other countries is ever brought out during the debates. What have these senators/governors/congressman really accomplished during their times in the Senate/House/State capitals. That would be substantive, informative, and helpful.
In short, these should be debates, not talk shows or shock. While it may boost viewership and present interest, it actually has little substance - which is what our country desperately needs more than anything right now.
4. Finally, I would like to see more "fair" journalism, and Wolf (if you really read and write these posts), I would really like to see you take the lead on this. Be more of a "Cronkite" or a "Murrow" than a "Springer".

God bless (all of you), and I look forward to seeing the results tonight.

Candi   February 5th, 2008 6:52 pm ET

Although there are many who want to jump in the middle of the media when their candidate is down we all need to step back and clear our heads. CNN has done a respectable job during this campaign. Those who are now baliming the media for the downward movement of the Clintons need to step back and remember the past referenced by the Clintons. Sopme of us a re old enough to remember the Clintons when they were bringing shame on the presidency. I for one have not forgotten whitewater, Hillary's futures market profits, contributors in the whitehouse, the Arkansas State Police adventures, the great right wing conspiracy, Bill and the interns, Hillary's lies, Bill's. Perjury, and last but not least impeachment. These things were not caused or created by the media. These things were the result of the Clinton's on actions. The media reported it all and were scapegoated by the Clinton but they were their own and our worst enemy. We said good-by to them years ago hopefully we can say good-by again real soon.

JB   February 5th, 2008 6:50 pm ET

Any night stuck with Blitzer is a long night. I'll be catching the returns tomorrow morning…

Andrea   February 5th, 2008 6:48 pm ET

Shame on you Cafferty for displaying e-mails from around the world. yes, this great country has a great impact on the world, but this is OUR country's election. NOT THEIRS!

Stan   February 5th, 2008 6:48 pm ET

Wolf, I enjoy your show, Congrats on a job well done!

Luc Vienneau   February 5th, 2008 6:43 pm ET

I just heard you mention that many people around the world are watching this presidential race. As a Canadian, I can speak to this sentiment. It is because your government makes us all a little nervous. With undeclared wars & Patriot Acts & the SPP/NAU, we in Canada especially have a little to worry about.

scout   February 5th, 2008 6:43 pm ET

Wow, are people getting nasty or what? Just an FYI… there is a lot of "editing" and moderation going on here!

Allison   February 5th, 2008 6:42 pm ET

Jonathan,
My condolences to you and your family on the loss of your brother. I further more agree that out troops need to be brought home as in our family have lost a cousin on October 4th and still have 5 cousins over there fighting. I have with great confidence that Hillary Clinton will be bringing our troops home after she is elected. Hang in there as this is the most difficult time in your life.. May peace be with you and your family.

Fraudulent Sam   February 5th, 2008 6:40 pm ET

Surging cost of Gasoline Crushing our Economy

As today’s Presidential hopefuls try to face issues, why does this issue remain hidden from the election fore front? Its time that the alternative fuels stop being used for race competition sponsored by companies like Red Bull, Monster Energy, and Mountain Dew.

Silence D   February 5th, 2008 6:39 pm ET

I can't wait for the results to come in tomorrow declaring anyone but Clinton the winner.

SAY NO TO FASCISM! SAY NO TO HILARY!

FREE PEOPLE FOR A FREE AMERICA!

jonathan   February 5th, 2008 6:36 pm ET

Dear people of the united states,
In this day and age it is important to remember that there is a war going on ..people have seem to have forgotten..The reason am letting u guys know this is because my brother came home in a body bag today …..We need change in this world and the republics need to get out of office …My family morns the lost of my brother ….and iam turned off on the election…I hope who ever wins …bring s home our troops …lets not forget em ….god bless the USA ……
support our troops
not the political crap
jonathan

Kate S   February 5th, 2008 6:35 pm ET

Not sure if you read all these comments, but I wanted to thank you for all your hard work during these primaries. It's amazing how much dedication you all have, and it's very clear how enthusiastic everyone at CNN is about this election. It makes me wish I could work there. I see in your Wiki that you are from Buffalo, which is neat because I went to UB as well. I'm curious as to what your political position is but maybe we'll never know. Thanks again for bringing your excitement to my CNN addiction days! -political junkie in Seattle

Heidi   February 5th, 2008 6:21 pm ET

I voted this morning. I always hand deliver my absentee ballot to the polling place.

I live in California, in an ultra-conservative small town and I NEVER thought I would see this, but there are OBAMA shirts everywhere. This is a town that went for Tom McClintoc against Schwarzenegger last time… Religious, extreme conservatives.

I voted for Obama.

I am a woman, and for me, everytime I see her speak, I just think she's being dishonest. With Obama, I have a strong gut feeling that he is honest.

I have a 17 year old son who will have to register with the selective service this December and I think that Hillary would say anything to get me vote, but then change NOTHING if elected and so Bush's 14 permanent military bases would become a reality in Iraq, and given the state of the military, they would eventually HAVE TO DRAFT.

I cannot support that for this phony war for Exxon.

Peace   February 5th, 2008 6:21 pm ET

Please do not come and tell us again the Polls were wrong. Most people trust Zogby Poll and he is very professional on his work.

Raum   February 5th, 2008 6:17 pm ET

I like Wolf, CNN has the best election coverage hands down.

Obama/Edwards 08!

Jo Ann   February 5th, 2008 6:12 pm ET

Wolf,
Glad to see you are keeping yourself fit! Five miles is impressive! Now how about adding some muscle building.

To Peter @ 4:01PM, I am afraid that you might be right, but MSNBC is doing the same thing.

Aaron, NC   February 5th, 2008 6:02 pm ET

Wolf,

Thank you so much for what you do! Keep up the blogging-I love to see the behind the scenes work that you all do.

You truly are the best political team on television!

Aaron

JoeyBLS   February 5th, 2008 6:01 pm ET

Hi Wolf,

This is the first election in MANY years that has renewed life into voters and has given new excitement in our election process. Many voters, old and young, will be voting for the first time. As one watches CNN, the words 'conservative' and 'liberal' are thrown around as often as the words 'democrat' and republican'. Can you please explain (on-air) what defines a 'conservative candidate' and what defines a 'liberal candidate'?

Thank you,
JoeyBLS

Joan   February 5th, 2008 6:01 pm ET

Wolf can show bias against Clinton as he was during the CA debate, and Clinton can set him straight - as she did. I actually flinched when he exhibited such an "unjournalistic" display as he did with his question of her regarding her support of the inspectors at the beginning of the war.

Lynn in St. Louis   February 5th, 2008 6:00 pm ET

I hope that CNN will give fair coverage to all the candidates running in the primaries. If you and your reporters (with fancy titles) support a candidate, they should let us know by wearing big buttons so we can decide if what they are saying is reporting or editorializing.

Richard Almond   February 5th, 2008 5:54 pm ET

The nature of your questions and commentary in debates and interviews suggests a definite pro-Clinton bias. Are you aware of that? Is that the intent, as part of your careful preparation? For example, the "dream ticket" question to Obama is a clear Clinton message: Hillary is the top position, will you accept Vice President gracefully?

To all the Hill-Billy's   February 5th, 2008 5:53 pm ET

It's funny that you say CNN is biased because they are focusing on Barack so much….If Hillary was actually doing something rather than normal politicking and breaking out the tears for the camera then maybe they would….In a race of Issues Vs. Character Obama wins on both ends, and to those that just think that Obama is a pulpit politician come to Illinois where directly after he was elected to the senate he was right back out among the community talking to the people and working with the people of Illinois to make things happen….rather than taking a vacation like Hillary.

I'd rather take a chance on someone that follows through on what they say, rather than someone that says what they need to get elected and then changes their plan once they are elected but thats just me… Obama '08

The Dejected American   February 5th, 2008 5:52 pm ET

Having tuned into CNN since the closing bell of todays dismal performance of the stock market, it would appear that there is 5 candidates still in the race.

Wolf, there is 6 candidates still in this race.

Kristine   February 5th, 2008 5:50 pm ET

After years of watching cable news I finally have to say something about you Wolf.

Your bias towards all conservative moral people in this great country is outrageous. You are my least favorite commentator on CNN. Bias’ in the new media has and always will exist however you are by far off the charts. Your lack of personality and friendliness turns people off. Who hired you? I am a proud republican and hope your candidate Hillary goes down in flames. I have no problem voting for a women but Hillary is not the one. If she were a true feminist she would have dumped her lying cheating husband years ago. I guess she had ulterior motives.

With the amount of time and effort you have put into being prepared each day, why can’t you find time to see both sides. My distain for you is not just aimed at this election but is a result of years of unfair reporting. It is not healthy for me to spend time letting your opinions infuriate me so I will discontinue watching your station but only when you are on.

Gwen F   February 5th, 2008 5:50 pm ET

I am addicted to CNN coverage of the political races. Without CNN and Cspan we could not really be a democracy. An educated electorate, is helping to change politics—Please keep the politicians honest.

Obama 2009

S. Hunt   February 5th, 2008 5:50 pm ET

Wolfe, I hope you have plenty of coffee, it is going to be a very long night. Kind of like going into labor, can't wait to see what our citizens have delivered.

DAVID M KEATING   February 5th, 2008 5:50 pm ET

WOLF YOU GET IT. HE IS A WINNER.

Elicka   February 5th, 2008 5:46 pm ET

Hey Wolf–I'm a long term CNN watcher, but lately, it's felt more due to the lack of good alternatives than your good reporting. This "best political team on television" thing. Says who? You need to stop that, as you sound ridiculous, and saying it every three seconds doesn't make it true. More something FOX would do. Or Bush. So, if CNN is looking to promote itself through the repetition of baseless propaganda, instead of being "the most trusted name in news" (there you go again), er, mission accomplished . . .

shawn   February 5th, 2008 5:44 pm ET

Wolf thank you for being "fair and balanced" unlike the other network that doesn't practice what they preach…Thanks again!!

Charlotte   February 5th, 2008 5:41 pm ET

Wolf, please, what ever you do, do not refer to a Hillary win as a beauty contest. That was so male chauvinistic.

Ken   February 5th, 2008 5:40 pm ET

Can anyone ever imagine Walter Cronkite talking about himself — pontificating on what he eats for breakfast like it could matter in the least.

We have made the media — even the news media — celebrities, and the news will never be as good as it once was.

Wolf: You are not the point. Fade into the background. Be a non-personality that is focused on what we should be focused on, and that is not you.

Janette, Honolulu   February 5th, 2008 5:39 pm ET

I've been a moral supporter of CNN until this election! However, clearly CNN wants McCain to win, and reinforces the states that Huckabee and McCain have won, while barely mentioning all the delegates Romney has accumulated and the big states in which he has won by securing a VAST majority of the votes. McCains wins consist of almost ties in states where his military record really matters a lot.
Liberals are loving Huckabee and McCain right now, because they know Romney is the only chance the Republicans have in a general election!!

Why must CNN underestimate the intelligence of its viewers?!

I nominate Anderson Cooper for president!! The spin stops in the AC zone….but don't get me started with his clearly anti-Romney and pro you-know-who political team!

Janette, Honolulu

Seeking Honest Nominee   February 5th, 2008 5:38 pm ET

Don't underestimate how angry and disgusted many Republicans are with McCain. I've already conversed with over forty republicans who will not support McCain if he wins the nomination. I've heard responses from, "I'll write in a candidate," to "I won't vote at all for President." And yes, I've heard several say "Hillary will get my vote before McCain will - at least you know what you get with her." It's not a conservative or far right problem. It is an honesty, integrity and character problem with McCain. Mavericks may inspire legends but they never inspire trust because they don't use ethical means to get things done - they are mercenary. That's the problem with McCain - anything to win. (West Virginia is a small example.) Many Republicans simply don't want to put another back-room dealing, nasty-tempered crooked-talker in the White House. Been there. Done that. The anti-McCain vote simply doesn't want to make the "Crooked Talker" our President. We'd rather see a Democrat in there than an egotistical, cut-throat, backstabbing politician that we have to be responsible for. Some disenchanted voters may justify it and say, "He is, at least, a Republican, the lesser of two evils." But he is still evil (as in NOT good for the country.) That's what the anti-McCain vote is all about - we simply won't give him our vote.

Wayne, Florida   February 5th, 2008 5:35 pm ET

Since the Democratic party is acting so stupid about not counting their delegates, I want my vote to count. I am a Demorcrat , I am going to fight very hard to have all democrats change to Republican so all people will have a say so.

Joe Sunrise Fl   February 5th, 2008 5:35 pm ET

For those accusing CNN of favoring OBAMA, would check POLITICO.com , ABC, FOX or any other network LOL it's not any different. Because it can't be different folks ! The man is just the main subject of discussion LOL Don't blame the networks, Blame is rhetoric, Blame is elegeance, blame is apperance, blame is race, blame is background, blame is abilities to capture people everything that makes OBAMA the "Phenomenon".

Hillary is a good politician guys !!! But can 1 of you tell me why she should get the spolight ? What 's new !?! We've seen and heard about her in the past 16 years right ?

Pharaoh   February 5th, 2008 5:34 pm ET

That's right let's not forget that CNN was riding the "inevitable" nominee wave until Obama won in Iowa. I think he rightly deserves the good press he has gotten. Another thing to consider if you haven't voted yet is republicans will vote if Hillary is the nominee even if they don't like their candidate. I think Obama has a much better chance to win the general election. He is already attracting independents and republicans in open primaries.

judith rocchio (pronounced like Pinocchio)   February 5th, 2008 5:34 pm ET

Dear Wolf or to whom it may concern:

My daughter in Rome tells me there were CNN reporters covering the big Democrats Abroad rallies today and this evening. She had just come from an exciting rally for Obama. Why aren't you broadcasting any of this?

Thanks,
Judith Rocchio

Questions for Dems Abroad, ask: Tina Marisa Rocchio @ 011 39 347 744 3094

6 hours ahead.

Sam   February 5th, 2008 5:32 pm ET

Wolf I am a Die Hard CNN observer but if CNN does not stop talking about todays first exit polls, and then not showing them you are going to lose a lot of observers including me. Stop saying you are going to show exit poll results and just show them.

Carl MN   February 5th, 2008 5:32 pm ET

Nice quick blog Wolf.

I suggest all the posters calling Wolf biased to turn back your TV channel to FOX news…

College girl in Texas   February 5th, 2008 5:31 pm ET

I may not know you politically; but if I don't speak out now, when it counts then I am less than who I should be.
I believe in Hillary. I would like to see her become the first woman president. I believe that she is the most qualified to:
1) get us out of Iraq - in a responsible way,
2) restore our integrity, credibility and prestige internationally,
3)RESTORE OUR ECONOMY - try to undo some of the terrible unfair tax cuts and stop the horrid budget deficits (NO ONE can EVER claim that this administration was "conservative" - they just spent without paying!!)
4) put emphasis in public education on federal aid for early childhood education and special education - rather than on test taking
5) establish fair health care where EVERY citizen benefits and every citizen pays,
6) and follow and respect our Constitution.

Not that I don't think Obama will try to do some of these things: but he hasn't don't anything yet - just rhetoric. He talks a good game, but when he had to actually dirty himself by actually voting in the Senate to fund the war - he voted to fund it. Sure he spoke out against the war when his vote didn't make a difference. Leading is about making tough decisions, and Obama might be a good leader in the future, but he hasn't done enough to prove to me that he can get us out of the dark hole Bush has left us in.

I can't vote today, (the Texas primary is in March), but you can. Please consider Hillary on her own merits. If you can vote for her today - please do; if you can't, please forward this to someone in one of the 21 states who can.

C   February 5th, 2008 5:31 pm ET

Hey Wolf, you gonna start attacking Clinton again and start blowing sunshine up Mr. Obama's behind? That's a typical day for you and CNN.

Charlotte   February 5th, 2008 5:30 pm ET

Wolf, you will be fine. Obama is not in favor of debates because he is a pulpit politician. His interview with you on Iraq. He said, "I will pull all troops out of Iraq in 16mos." When pressed by you he said "I would keep the opitions open." So, pulpit politics is his forte, questions and answers are not.

David   February 5th, 2008 5:27 pm ET

It is sort of sad that the news media has drastically changed from something that informed the people to something that is driven by revenues. In the old days it was a given that the news segment was not a money maker. Instead, the news segment was seen more as a public service. Today the news segment is a 24 hour 7 day a week revenue stream.

I do enjoy watching CNN. I was glued to CNN on 9/11. Even so it is still sad that so much energy and time is put into drawing more viewers in order to gain a larger revenue share.

I just hope CNN doesn't try to spin all the numbers that will be reported tonight. Just report the facts, draw some interesting conclusions, and do some interviews. Don't spin the numbers with conjecture and opinion. Leave that up to the actual candidates.

Brian   February 5th, 2008 5:27 pm ET

What is this, the Hillary Clinton cry room?!?
Obama 08!

HH   February 5th, 2008 5:26 pm ET

Great job on the five miles run.

How fast were you running?

dj4wrd   February 5th, 2008 5:22 pm ET

For all of you upset with Wolf letting us know about his day and how he preps, relax. He's not on air talking about breakfast. He's mentioned on air to check his blog. So what. It's a loooooooong day. Can you imagine trying to fill an entire day with "We don't know anything yet. We are anxiously waiting for results." That's what's going in this early part of a long day. I highly doubt Wolf will be talking about his blog or breakfast in 4hrs. And to Wolf - nice work! I appreciate your commentary and look forward to a long evening of watching the results. Cereal or eggs this morning? Hopefully a bloody mary to help you through too!

Big Doug   February 5th, 2008 5:21 pm ET

Peter - Thank you for your comment cause it is right on the mark… CNN has consistently shown that they are for OBAMA.

If it were not for the press and their desire for $$$ and ratings, Obama would not be anywhere near where he is in this race… HILLARY WILL PREVAIL and win the nomination. See you at the Pepsi Center in Denver this August. Go Hillary!

Peter February 5, 2008 4:01 pm ET

This doesn't have to be a long night. I can give you CNN's results right now:

If Clinton gets the popular vote and looses the delegates, Obama wins.
If Clinton looses the popular vote and gets the delegates, Obama wins.
If Clinton wins the popular vote and wins the delegates, Obama wins.

LC   February 5th, 2008 5:21 pm ET

Uh, oh… Wolf is pumped… that probably means we'll have to listen to the phrase "the best political team on televion" every 30 seconds instead of every 60 seconds! Wolf, if you really were the best political team on television, we would know it - you wouldn't have to tell us after every breath!

Al from Westport, MA   February 5th, 2008 5:21 pm ET

Wolf,

Now I see why you are so “Breathless”… “Breathless Blitzer”

Remember when Colin Powel said something to the effect… “Don’t get all breathless on me Wolf.”

Love that Jack Caferty!

Keep up the good work!

Josh   February 5th, 2008 5:20 pm ET

Hey Wolf. Just wanted to say keep up the good work. Just wanted to show the Situation Room some love from up here in Canada. Super Tuesday is just as super up here. Can't wait to see the results. Let's go Hillary.

P.S. LOLz for Peter's comment.

edward   February 5th, 2008 5:19 pm ET

No wonder you're one of the greatest in our time.Many of us look up to you.Good job Wolf.

daniel proulx   February 5th, 2008 5:18 pm ET

Keep the good work, Wolf.

This is from a french canadian citizen who won't miss The Situation Room for a million !

Kirk   February 5th, 2008 5:18 pm ET

You guys are great!

Paul, Atlanta   February 5th, 2008 5:17 pm ET

Best biased political team! That's CNN!

mgb   February 5th, 2008 5:17 pm ET

Word up Wolf -B!
Can you imagine Wolf running for president?? hehe..I have heard him talk..and he sounds the same even when he is not reading the prompter!..
"i always look forward to Wolf saying "CNN can now project that Obama is goin to win.." i repeat CNN can now project Obama will win…"

Good job Wolf!..and to the best political team on television..as wolf would put it!
Good job!

ralph davidson   February 5th, 2008 5:16 pm ET

wolf-i dont think this country is ready for obama. go hillary

Kirk   February 5th, 2008 5:15 pm ET

Look forward to an exciting long night with your professionalism, charisma, and outstanding teams. You guys are absolutely fantastic!

DAVID M KEATING   February 5th, 2008 5:13 pm ET

WOLF YOU GET IT.

oliver   February 5th, 2008 5:12 pm ET

"Experience and common sense policies should win out. Hillary has great policies and should not be ignored."

Dem08, are you speaking about Iraq ?

Robert Vorthman   February 5th, 2008 5:11 pm ET

Holy moly 5 miles everyday! What kind of treadmill do you use that is soft on you knees?

Pat   February 5th, 2008 5:11 pm ET

TO PETER……

If Clinton gets the popular vote and looses the delegates,Peter loses
If Clinton looses the popular vote and gets the delegates, Peter loses
If Clinton wins the popular vote and wins the delegates, Peter loses

You are too weird!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Stephina   February 5th, 2008 5:11 pm ET

To Lorraine

Yes, I have also noticed the decline in the Stock Markets when Obama has won a primary and the rise of them when Clinton has won.

Obama presents too much uncertainty to the world. European countries do not support Obama. He is popular in Germany and some other parts of Europe with the youths in those nations. However, political support from EU nations is not in favor of Obama. The same holds true for Isreal, who depends heavily on US support.

There are so many other influences that will play a part in the election, so if I were betting money, the final 2 choices will be Clinton & McCain.

JWW   February 5th, 2008 5:09 pm ET

I agree with Peter Wolf. Just think Wolf all this fatigue will be worth it. In the morning you will have Barack almost in office. Your Boss don't seem to care about your performance. Most supervisors would have you under control by now. CNN is about to lose a lot of viewers and then when the boss sees that maybe he will put you back in line like the guy you used to be when he hired you. Most people would consider what you are doing and leading a crooked crime.

Valerie   February 5th, 2008 5:07 pm ET

Hi Wolf, thank you for your consistent excellent journalism! As your northern CDN cousins…we will there with you, watching this MOST important election for both of our countries! Go Barack!!

Jeremy   February 5th, 2008 5:05 pm ET

Is it just me, or are 90% of the 'Hillary Lover' comments completely unintelligible? I'm also amazed by the posts from people saying, "OMG, CNN IS IN LOVE WITH OBAMA AND WON'T POST MY NEGATIVE COMMENT ABOUT HIM!" when a majority of the comments on here are anti-Obama.

Get over it Clinton lovers. Just get in line with the other sheep.

Obama '08

Kiera   February 5th, 2008 5:04 pm ET

I think if Obama Wins all the primars and delagets tonight then it wuld be very hard for Hilery to chatch up

Barry   February 5th, 2008 5:03 pm ET

Never ending blather from a talking head.

Sam   February 5th, 2008 5:03 pm ET

LOL - CNN Results: Obama Wins

If Clinton wins more states, she won't do it by "quite enough"

If Obama wins more states by 1/2 a percent it will be a HUGE VICTORY and a CRUSHING DEFEAT for the Clinton Camp.

I can hear those CNN anchors now "This has got to be a HUGE dissapointment for Hillary" or, conversely "Hillary didn't deliver the decisive blow today, meaning this is a long haul for her with lots of toug contests coming up".

It's laughable, but sad because it's true.

ObamaSUPPORTER   February 5th, 2008 5:03 pm ET

Wolfe,
I truly think you and your team do a great Job! I love your programs and coverage. Keep up the good work.

Dennis   February 5th, 2008 5:03 pm ET

Clinton supporters need to get off this "the media hates Hillary and is pulling for Obama" tune. It is getting stale and it isn't true. Notice the link to the fact check piece? Notice the spot on the ticker about Hillary being on Letterman? Hillary is getting plenty of coverage here today.

PS   February 5th, 2008 5:01 pm ET

Hi Wolf

What your CNN's independnt man is thinking. Is he searching for another Ross Pero or Ralph Nader? You guys deserve a break. Why don't you ask for that to your boss.

Adele   February 5th, 2008 5:01 pm ET

Everyone seem to be down on Obama. I am just fed up with the Clinton's. Do we really want to have anot