February 5, 2008
Posted: 04:18 PM ET
Clinton is calling for one debate a week.
Clinton is calling for one debate a week.

NEW YORK (CNN) — Hillary Clinton’s campaign said Tuesday it was calling for a debate a week between the New York senator Barack Obama between now and the March 4 primaries.

In a conference call with reporters, Clinton communications director Howard Wolfson said the campaign had already accepted four invitations for faceoffs throughout this month, including forums on CNN and FOX.

Earlier this cycle, a Democratic debate co-sponsored by FOX and the CBC was canceled after the major candidates refused to participate.

The Obama campaign said it has yet to make a decision on any of the proposed one-on-one debates.

Filed under: Barack Obama • Hillary Clinton


Maureen Poorman   February 6th, 2008 4:12 pm ET

Obama, you gotta push it!!!!! Do we really want another Clinton in office?

Didn't we see enough of Hillary already? Standing by her 35 plus years of political experience really isn't the best background…hasn't anyone told her we US citizens are sick to death of the same old politics? Is she going to win the office and then go through some kind of dramatic change?

And her age IS a factor – no one's afraid to tell John McCain – obviously no one wants to mention this to Hillary. She's just too old. She looks really rough just from the time she's spent on the campaign trail. She'll never survive the rigors of President of the US. And I'm a female that would love to vote for the first female president.

And really Bill….stay at home!

Nicholas Holman   February 6th, 2008 12:59 pm ET

This is to prevent Obama from being where he needs to be — out on the trail.

Jose Zepeda   February 6th, 2008 11:56 am ET

Obama will continue to lead and distribute purity and honesty, nevertheless Clinton can't seem to be honest and 100% with all of her answers. We need a president who will make change to this country, and that is OBAMA 08

MP Flinn   February 6th, 2008 11:24 am ET

Senator Obama's strength comes from getting "with" the people on the ground. Senator Clinton's 8 years in the WH gave her many such opportunities. Once-a-week debates (like using TIVO) are intended to prevent us from seeing his crowds at rallies, hearing him speak and answer questions in person, unfiltered by the so-called pundits of the media. This is a Clinton tactic from a weakening campaign; don't fall for it.

64-year-old woman and I'm for Obama and real change

Susan-Ohio   February 6th, 2008 10:56 am ET

Hillary is running out of money, this is why she wants the Debates. They said that on Television today. Barack FOR SURE is not afraid of a debate. He is a fighter! YOU GO BARACK!

Susan   February 6th, 2008 10:47 am ET

All of you people out there who criticise and down Barack or anyone else who presents fresh ideas to make things work for the American people are just like some of them that are now working in the whitehouse. This is what Barack is trying to change, the mentality of people. He is a man who wants to work together with all people for the common cause. This is why we don't get anything done in the White House. Always a power struggle. This is why the United States is in the shape it is in right now. EGO! Thinking about there ownselves instead of the American people. It's time for something new and fresh who can get the job done and can work with people. We cannot afford again to choose someone who is incompetent and who is not working in the best interest of the American people.
There is nothing fresh and new about Hillary. Hillary is not forerunner yet, so lets all be meek and humble in our thoughts.

Susan   February 6th, 2008 10:33 am ET

Obama is the only one that I have ever seen besides John Kennedy that could and would get the job done! I sincerely believe that. He is fresh and comes with new ideas on change for the better for the American people. We have to move on America. Lets put someone in there who can get the job done. He needs are help. Lets do everything we can to support him. Those of you who are only in word, must also display deed so we can help Obrack get where he has to go, THE WHITEHOUSE..

Susan   February 6th, 2008 10:26 am ET

Obama is the man for change. He has integrity and is superior in bringing all people together to get the job done. His message is about uniting and changing the white house mentality as well as working for the common good of the American people. I'M FOR THAT! YES WE CAN!

MarylandJD   February 6th, 2008 7:05 am ET

Obama does not want to debate. Half the people that support him does not know what he really stands for.

Clifford Wilson   February 6th, 2008 4:38 am ET

Vote Obama!!!

I am a born again Holy Spirit filled man speaking my heart… I am 47 years old and white and non partizen.
I believe it is time for positive change and it is high time we the people took responsibility for our selves. Universal Healthcare is a good idea but we must as a majority, live healthier so that folks who really need health care have it.

Clifford Wilson   February 6th, 2008 4:18 am ET

I beleive it would be better if each canidate gave us a 15 minute speach and Then a debate all in one day because I want to see who can go toe to toe with McCaine! also do we really want to chance further embarresment from Former President Clinton? As……..First Man?

BigBob   February 6th, 2008 12:43 am ET

Obama won mostly red states. That doesn't bode well in the general election when those states are likely to go Republican anyways.

Karry Ling   February 5th, 2008 10:12 pm ET

Red Democrat,

"Hillary has better name-recognition."
In times of change i wouldn't call it advantage, we're not talking about DVD-Players here. Name recognition might work for ignorants or uneducated people, but in this case it is rather the opposite. "Clinton" has some worn out aftertaste. 20th century. I guess it's a perspective thing, though.

"Hillary has more money."
"Some people say" she's a bit short on campaign money. Hence the Fox deal? What's all the money worth if the person appears totally artificial? You can't buy all the people, you're really poor if you have to. Wealth shouldn't play any role in elections, but unfortunately it does.

"Hillary is better in debates."
Technically maybe. Shrill parrot talk might impress naive folks but puts them to sleep shortly after. I rather listen to authentic HUMAN stutter. Nobody is perfect, but Hillary wants to be. Also, the more Barack talks, the more popular he gets, his appearance is really calm and presidential.

"Hillary has Bill."
..because without him she wouldn't be where she is. This is about Hillary not Billary. Yet she seems to need his support.

"Hillary wants to win."
They all want to win but i think Barack has more fun doing his thing, which is healthy for the back. Hillary is doing it for herself, not for the people. I dislike this "at all costs" approach, it smells bad and will lead to misery. Hillary has some skills but she's a maniac (just look at her pics over the net with her eyeballs almost popping out) and the personification of crave and fall. History will decide. :)

Ms. Rene Freeman   February 5th, 2008 9:49 pm ET

I totally agree that if she was leading with a high percentage, she would not be asking for debates. She is stunned! She thought she was a shoe in for the position.
Something to think about. I constantly hear how Bill Clinton was the first 'black' president and that they both totally understand the trials and tribulations that African-Americans are still faced with. WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME he was stopped because he was driving an expensive car? Think about.
They have both played the gender card and the race card and are showing their true colors.

viveka   February 5th, 2008 9:01 pm ET

I would love to see hillary Clinton in the white house and hope she wins. Obama is a good orator but that seems to be the limit to his credentials……This country needs to have a strong leader come in which I truly believe Clinton is. I do hope everyone realises that with voting for Obama they might just be voting for a very good actor / performer versus a seasoned and capable leader.

Cheers to Hillary – we really do need a clinton back in the white house to clean up after the Bush reign !!!!!

TrueBlueMajority   February 5th, 2008 8:38 pm ET

Calling for lots of debates is not the kind of move a frontrunner makes.

Mike   February 5th, 2008 8:14 pm ET

It is not in his favor for two primary reasons. One, she gets free use of air time. Two she has her husband campaigning while Obama himself is stalled debating.

It is not only not in his best interest, but it gives Hillary an unfair advantage.

irma   February 5th, 2008 8:10 pm ET

Oh that's right; Obama and his supporters only want him to do scripted speeches since he doesn't do well on the spot. Doesn't like to answer questions about detail, only likes to talk in generalizations about change.

Daniel Walker   February 5th, 2008 8:09 pm ET

The lady who would be king should be careful what she wishes for.

irma   February 5th, 2008 8:07 pm ET

Uh hello Dave; Yes, Obama has refused to do debates. He claimed they were pointless. Haven't been on the Obama train long have you?

irma   February 5th, 2008 8:04 pm ET

Yes, Yes, Yes! The ratings would be high! I rarely watch T.V. because it is so "Reality" driven about "Reality" that I am not interested in. However, Hillary and Barack hammering out the issues, I am there! Please do it!

J. G.   February 5th, 2008 8:00 pm ET

She is weak at campaigning and good at debating.
Since she is better at debating than campaigning, why not request more debates.
Everywhere Obama goes to campaign, he does remarkably well so there is an added benefit in keeping him off the campaign trail and restricting his movements to be at the debate locations.

BarronLV   February 5th, 2008 7:38 pm ET

Red Democrat……..DITTOS…………..Well Said and Bravo!

Emanuel   February 5th, 2008 7:36 pm ET

Obama should have responded yes. Is he afraid that voters will start realizing that he is just alot of hype? That he lacks substance on specific issues? Maybe he's afraid that voters will start asking: WHERE'S THE BEEF?

Red Democrat   February 5th, 2008 7:34 pm ET

You know, it's interesting to see how many people on Obama's side are AGAINST the idea of more debates. Why is that? How on EARTH is discourse and debate a bad idea in a political contest? All the comments seem to reflect that more debates are favorable to Hillary. I agree – but don't we want the chance to choose the BEST player to represent our team? Why should we (as the democratic party) SHIELD Obama from these contests just so he doesn't get hurt? Isn't that the same as admitting that he's a weaker candidate? I like Obama. I think he'd be a SHOE-IN in 2016, and I bet he'd be great. But right now, Clinton is the Democratic party's biggest gun. Shouldn't we use our biggest gun in the upcoming gunfight? Shouldn't we PAVE THE WAY for an Obama presidency before sending the fresh-faced newcomer into battle? Isn't the possibility of 16 years democratic control of the white house better than the possibility of 8? He's young. He can run again.

Obama stutters in debates. He blinks a lot. He's not GREAT at them. I think that means he needs a few years practice. We're not picking a president, we're picking a CANDIDATE to run in a RACE. Why go with our second best? Is is just because liberals like to root for the underdog? Seriously, Obama supporters, EXPLAIN it to me. I like him too, but is he ready for the big leagues if he can't hold his own in a debate?

"Hillary has better name-recognition."
"Hillary has more money."
"Hillary is better in debates."
"Hillary has Bill."
"Hillary wants to win."

Personally I find that last item a refreshing change from '04 and '00, but I keep hearing Obama supporters mention these points like they're BAD things.
Obama supporters please respond: Don't say it's not FAIR that she's a stronger cadidate… Explain why we don't want those strengths on our side come November. Why throw all that over the rail?
And don't forget, I like Obama too, so don't accuse me of bashing.
Why does the democratic party CHOOSE to remain divided on this? Seriously, I'd love some Obama supporters to respond.

dave   February 5th, 2008 7:29 pm ET

hi bilary supporters, has obama refused any debate? why are you wasting your time and debating on what somebody has not said. this is the same as changing obamas records and words; the tactics bill used in the past. Obama has not refused any debate so stop blackmailing him.

PAST vs FUTURE
LIGHT vs DARKNESS
BELIEVE IN YOURSELF

CHANGE WE WILL

kenya   February 5th, 2008 7:26 pm ET

Here America!!!,

If you want to work for a poor boss, go for Obama. If you want to work for a rice boss go for Hillary. that the different between those two.

It just like a car saleman and the car owner.
You can email if you know better than me

Arthur Holmes   February 5th, 2008 7:20 pm ET

I hear dumb people. There they are over there saying things just to hear themselves talk. A debate a week, what a pathetic request. Hillary is so experienced that she will think every little issue to death and then come to the American Citizens with a long-winded story and tears as to why we should agree with her. Obama bashers are just upset because they realize that Obama is the best choice for president. Get over yourselves Clintons it's Obama's turn to lead this country.

George from Minneapolis   February 5th, 2008 7:16 pm ET

Barron:

Obama is the headliner. He would never be her V.P… he is the star…. perhaps she can be secretary of health.

BarronLV   February 5th, 2008 7:13 pm ET

Okay Kids, FACE IT, Look for a CLINTON/OBAMA Ticket in November. Democrats want to WIN the White House. So stop all this division. UNITE Dems!

Deirdre   February 5th, 2008 7:12 pm ET

If Hillary wins big tonight, will she still demand a debate every week for the remainder of the campaign? I bet she will not, since she would be afraid of making a mistake, and Senator Obama would be free to go for a knock out punch.

Matt Scott   February 5th, 2008 7:12 pm ET

If you Clinton supporters didn't have your heads so far up Hillary's ***hole you would have already went to Obama's website and LOOKED at the very DETAILED plans he has for the country.

George from Minneapolis   February 5th, 2008 7:11 pm ET

How can Hillary win a debate when she does not even answer the questions. When she is asked a question she gives spin and not a straight honest answer.

I want someone who talks straight not a person who talks out of both sides of their mouth like Hillary.

Hillary is as phony as a 3 dollar bill. Obama is correct, she will say anything to get elected except give a straightforward answer to a question.

She must think the American people are pretty dumb.

R. Rodriguez   February 5th, 2008 7:05 pm ET

All of the Obama backers haven't checked who this man is and you are entrusting him the presidency of the USA? This man is a creation of the media. No substance and lots of fanfarre so called 'inspiration' with no real change. Barack Husein Obama is his full name. His father and grandfather are islamic foreigners, and part of Obama's family is islamic. This is true, do your background check. Another fact: Rezko (in jail now for bribery of politicians) helped Obama buy his current million dollar home. Another fact. Check for yourselves. There is nothing different about this guy, wake up america ! You are drinking his coolaid.

Brit   February 5th, 2008 7:01 pm ET

I am a 16 year old supporter of Barack Obama. I have been doing all that I can to help his campaign

Mary   February 5th, 2008 7:00 pm ET

As you can see by the comments, regarding the issue of debating weekly, our audience is very immature. Guys have your fun, someday you will understand the real purpose of voting. We all vote for the candidate that we like. This is America, and that stand for Freedom to choose. I don't know why Mrs. clinton wants a weekly debate, but its her chose to suggest, and Obama's chose to refuse. We are a Democrats, and our stand is to support our party. Win, lose or draw Mrs. Clinton is in the race to win as Obama. Lets support them, they are our leaders in the Democratic Party.

SJ CA   February 5th, 2008 7:00 pm ET

"
If there are debates, which I agree with Hillary Clinton there should be, could someone tell Obama that it is very ignorant to raise his finger while the other candidate is talking.

If he was a true professional he would know that during a debate there is a question and answer phase and a rebuttal phase.
"

I think ALL the candidates need to learn how a debate works – no one seems to follow good debate procedure. On that note, though, I really hope that someone can get a new stock photo for these articles.

NickNasc   February 5th, 2008 6:54 pm ET

You ask WHY??? How about , lets keep Barak off the road and too busy repeating the same thing on TV every week while the REAL Clinton who is running for office has 100% of HIS time to Campaign. I am not sure why she wants to Debate him so bad…she Always look like the Slippery non-answer type and he outshines her everytime with Facts and straight answers.

Claire, Austin, TX   February 5th, 2008 6:54 pm ET

UGH. Just tell your supports to go to your website and read your stuff and compare it with his website. Why more debates?? What a WASTE of time. All they do is cover 2-3 issues plus random stupid questions.

Molly Weasley   February 5th, 2008 6:53 pm ET

There have been at least 15 debates already. Why should any Democrat agree to debate on Fox News, the Republican channel? I hope Obama doesn't fall for this trick. Hillary's just trying to get free publicity.

Dem08   February 5th, 2008 6:50 pm ET

There is nothing wrong with debating. Why are the Obama supporters overall so bothered by this..This election is about issues.
Jaena, why does it matter to you what the ratings were for the town hall meeting. Ratings are like polls, mean very little. Did you watch? Or do you prefer to also speculate about Clinton like other Obama supporters who do not take the time to research canidates.

Hillary will prevail in 08

Nancy TC   February 5th, 2008 6:43 pm ET

If there are debates, which I agree with Hillary Clinton there should be, could someone tell Obama that it is very ignorant to raise his finger while the other candidate is talking.

If he was a true professional he would know that during a debate there is a question and answer phase and a rebuttal phase.

Lower the hand Obama. It is very annoying.

Pete a foreigner   February 5th, 2008 6:40 pm ET

THE U.S. ELECTION is very important because whoever wins the Presidential election on 2008, it will affect not only Americans but also billions of people around the world. HILLARY IS THE BEST CHOICE. THE WORLD WILL BE IN GOOD HAND UNDER HILLARY. I FERVENTLY HOPE SHE WIN.

Jon   February 5th, 2008 6:39 pm ET

I wouldn't suggest having a debate once a week. Although we could hear more of them from Hillary and Obama just to clarify of few other important issues they stand for. Hillary's strength of being a great communicator and organizer and someone who gets-the-job-done comes from all the years she worked as an attorney, child advocate, woman leader, wife of a: politician, former governor and former president and now as a senator herself. Hillary will stand up and do more for our country than her counterpart. We need to send her back to the White House so she can continue her service to the American people.

Dozirulf   February 5th, 2008 6:39 pm ET

Er… Who are these people who claim that Clinton should be the nominee because ONLY SHE can beat the Republicans???

Have you looked at the competition, lol? McCain? Romney? Huckabee?

Obama would make mincemeat of any of these clowns just as easily as Clinton could. If anything… the fact that Clinton is so disliked nationwide makes HER the risky nominee.

When Ohio votes, Obama gets MY vote.

go believe   February 5th, 2008 6:38 pm ET

I believe Hillary will win. Go Hillary!

Jaena from Boston   February 5th, 2008 6:38 pm ET

Why is it she wants to debate?. Could it be she wants more television coverage…. low on funds? hmmmm….. Interesting…

"We’ve picked up some e-mail traffic indicating that Nielsen has delayed the release of yesterday’s national cable overnight ratings “due to an issue loading necessary reference data updates.”

The numbers are to be released at 9 a.m. Wednesday. Which means we won’t know how many people tuned in to Hillary Clinton’s town hall meeting on the Hallmark channel until after Super Tuesday."

Mike from MA   February 5th, 2008 6:38 pm ET

Again Obama is showing his true calling card. He is afraid of answering questions at his "rally's" and now he is trying to get out of answering questions of the people.

If he can't take the heat now, just imagine how he would be in the big house.

I no longer want to hear from people that there reason for voting for this guy is because he will bring "change".

We need experience and everytime I see Hillary Clinton being asked a question, she never stumbles and she never talks around an issue.

She knows her stuff and you can tell that she does everytime she answers a question.

LisaMpls   February 5th, 2008 6:37 pm ET

Many of the posts on here are sick and wrong.

Allison   February 5th, 2008 6:36 pm ET

Lets go Hillary a debate a week is perfect lets see if Obama can keep up with you and answer direct questions without sidestepping doubt it though because that is not what he meant.

Marti San Diego, CA   February 5th, 2008 6:35 pm ET

I'd love to see Romney challenge McAmnesty to a debate each week. Perhaps then the Republicans would wake up and realize that McCain doesn't have a clue on most of the issues.

His only answer would get tiring after a while.

“Look, I was a foot soldier in the Reagan Revolution, I’m proud of my record, I’m proud to have people like Jack Kemp and Phil Graham supporting me.”

LisaMpls   February 5th, 2008 6:34 pm ET

Numerous Obama supporters on here are instructing him to limit his debates or not debate at all. Why? That is such a selfish maneuver by them. "Oh please, Obama, you know you don't always do as well in the debates, so please don't do them." What?? I as an American demand to know where he stands on the issues compared to Hillary. Stump speeches only get us so far. And issue pages on their websites only get us so far. At least Hillary has been taking more questions since Iowa, so we know where she stands on a broader range of issues. I don't care if Obama can get more people attracted to him by going around holding rallies…I can watch them on tv every day and see the exact same thing. We need more in depth debates. You sound ridiculous telling your candidate to not debate because that is not his strongest suit. What you're saying is, hide your stances from us so we can only hear your pretty speeches. Don't answer the tough questions because you look weak doing it. Maybe he doesn't have all the answers! And maybe, just maybe, you won't like all of his answers! But you won't know that if you keep sheltering him.

HyeWave - Glendale, CA   February 5th, 2008 6:30 pm ET

Her Majesty HRC is asking too much in so little time. She has alredy lost half the race. Her Majesty wants to slow down the Obama Tsunami. She is so worried that she needs to come-up with plan B, C, & DD for Drop Dead . Mr. Obama should ignore her new tactic or minimize it to one debate a month max. Obama is the clear choice for all Americans and subsequently the whole world…

rb in socal   February 5th, 2008 6:28 pm ET

For someone who has so much experience and name brand recognition, who's views and accomplishments by now should be well known, the question becomes – why does the Clinton campaign ask for a debate a week? Obviously to get Senator Obama off the campaign trail because as more folks come to know about him and what his plans are (check his web site if you are asking "what plans?"), his support continues to surge. A republican friend of ours yesterday said he wished he had changed his party affiliation by the deadline so he could have voted for Senator Obama today. I never thought I would have heard that from him.

Senator Obama, you are making great progess so I know your campaign is not going to let Senator Clinton's campaign dictate your strategy. Keep doing what you do so well and best of luck.

Go vote everyone!

Leigh   February 5th, 2008 6:28 pm ET

uhhh what momentum are you speaking of with Obama? I've checked several different poll sites and Hillary is ahead in every single one in…..why would she worry? and of course she wants debate because she knows that Obama can't ride on the coat tails of the Kennedy's and (hahahah) OPRAH forever……if he's forced to debate, he knows he will lose even faster. She making it quick and painless for him…..Obamanites should be grateful. I think it's uproarious the comment "hillary can't ride his coattails" HAHAHAHA i mean honestly!!! Ride the Coat tails of doing nothing and saying nothing???? Being a Lawyer and talking like one??? oh my god, i'm sorry that is TOO funny. I love the pompous nature of the voters for Obama…. you know very well that Obama has no chance and in the long run he'll be forgotten as quickly as the kegs the college kids supporting him drank last night.

Jon   February 5th, 2008 6:28 pm ET

Its a smart move. If Obama says no, it makes him looks scared

LisaMpls   February 5th, 2008 6:27 pm ET

Ok, ENOUGH about the comments that Hillary "cried." She teared up for one second. Watch the video and see for yourself. And I would only hope you would tear up too when you go back to your roots and have your long-time mentor giving a very heartfelt introduction (he was tearing up, too). And did you think Plexico was weak to have cried after he won the Super Bowl? Did you think TO was weak to have cried when people were hounding him about Romo dating Jessica Simpson? Did you think Mitt was weak when he teared up in December? Or Obama when he teared up towards the end of his NH speech? Come on!! ENOUGH WITH THE DOUBLE STANDARDS!!! Getting a little teary now and again displays heart and honest emotion.

Gene   February 5th, 2008 6:27 pm ET

Nonsense, we 're talking about American's health care crisis, deficit, war in Iraq, reclaim our future, repair our image abroad and provide jobs for Americans…Who cares about debate?

Mike in Atl, GA   February 5th, 2008 6:25 pm ET

To Jr.

That phrase you used is pure genius!!! You should have coined that and sold some tee shirts man! Make money off good ideas!!!

Hillary is desperate… Is the crying not working with the ladies Hill?

Ratgurl   February 5th, 2008 6:24 pm ET

Why is my commentary not being posted? It's not nearly as harsh as these Obama haters!

earl illingsworth   February 5th, 2008 6:23 pm ET

Debate and Debate as much as you can Senator Obama. There's just one caveat, "FOX Network" is a mouthpiece for GOP, only to throw back any disparaging comments/remarks in your face down the road. I would refuse their offer,let Hillary fly solo! As far as Public TV, CBS, CNN,and ABC ,I definitly would debate Hillary, their monitors our very versed with integrity and seem to have the general publics interest at hand. It could be the definitive moment of your great career and future. Great Question!

Brian   February 5th, 2008 6:19 pm ET

Obama is scared of debating her, that's why he doesn't want to agree to this. He isn't a candidate of substance at all, all his campaign events are more like pep rallies. Well we as a nation face some serious challenges and some serious issues, and pep rallies aren't going to solve them. For all you Obama supporters who had never even HEARD of him 4 months ago, wake up. This guy is all show, and we need substance.

In response   February 5th, 2008 6:18 pm ET

People should not have to have college degree to understand what a candidate is saying or what he stands for and Lord knows he is not the only person to write a book. Nothing wrong with keeping ones views and intentions clear and simple. As far as his being deep, or complex – well that is a matter of opinion.

GO HILLARY

Hovaz - Glendale, CA   February 5th, 2008 6:18 pm ET

Her Majesty HRC is asking too much in so little time. She has alredy lost half the race. Her Majesty wants to slow down the Obama Tsunami. She is so worried that she needs to come-up with plan B, C, & DD for Drop Dead . Mr. Obama should ignore her new tactic or minimize it to one debate a month max. Obama is the clear choice for all Americans and subsequently the whole world…

Dave Milk   February 5th, 2008 6:15 pm ET

A request for more debates, historically is the tool of the desperate, so
they can say. See he's afraid to discuss the issues, where in fact she has no desire to either.

Jay   February 5th, 2008 6:15 pm ET

Whoa whoa whoa Folks,

Can we keep this civil? I'm an Obama supporter and I agree with Dennis, Obama hasn't said he won't debate. It's kind of a busy day. Give them a chance.

Secondly, to everyone saying "Substance over style" implying that Obama has no specific plans and is all about rhetoric,. Well, I hate to tell you this but that claim is rhetoric in itself. Obama has very, and I mean VERY specific plans laid out for everything from Iraq to the economy to healthcare to everything else. If you would like to take the time to read them, look for his "Blueprint for Change." Be warned, it's quite long and will take some time to read. Much more time than to memorize "35 years" "ready on day one" and "It's universal – that means everyone! Like magic!"

I watched the last debate. I thought both of them did well and were very specific. It seems both sides of this have put on blinders and only choose to remember the positives of one candidate. Ask any republican or independent who will admit it: they both looked good.

Now, I support Obama for specific reasons. One, I think his healthcare plan is more realistic and much more likely to get republican support (you know how republicans feel about mandates). Two, he is CONSISTENT. Three, when people say "substance over style," well, I have to say I've never seen a politician with as much substance as Barack Obama. On top of everything else, he has some how managed to inspire an entire generation to become engaged in the political process. That's what I call substance, with style…

Katie   February 5th, 2008 6:14 pm ET

Hilary knows the only way she can look good is by using her super-polished politifcal double talk while Obama deliberately carefully thinks through matters.

She is a TV persona and belongs on soap operas.
He is a thinker and a statesman.

Another cheap publicity stunt by the Hillary camp – Hilar-ious!

Suzanne   February 5th, 2008 6:14 pm ET

THERE'S NOTHING WRONG WITH WANTING TO DEBATE OBAMA…OBVIOUSLY SOME PEOPLE DID'NT PAY ATTENTION TO THE OTHER DEBATES…HILLARY IS THE ONLY CANDIDATE WHO'S GOT ENOUGH BALLS TO QUESTION BARRACK OBAMA ABOUT WHO HE IS, HOW HE VOTED, HOW HE STANDS ON THE ISSUES..I MYSELF DON'T HAVE ANY HEALTH INSURANCE, UNDER OBAMA'S PLAN I STILL WON'T HAVE ANY BECAUSE HE ONLY WANTS TO GIVE INSURANCE TO CHILDREN AND THAT'S FINE BUT WHAT ABOUT THE REST OF THE PEOPLE IN THIS COUNTRY THAT HAVE NO INSURANCE??? HILLARY ON THE OTHER WANTS TO INSURE EVERYONE…I DON'T MIND HAVING TO PAY FOR INSURANCE AS LONG AS IT DOESN'T COST $500 A MONTH. HILLARY'S PLAN IS NO DIFFERENT THAN WHEN YOU WORK FOR A COMPANY YOU ALL SPLIT THE COST OF THE INSURANCE PROVIDED BY THE COMPANY YOU WORK FOR..HILLARY'S ALWAYS TOLD US ABOUT HER RECORD..SHE'S NOT A FLIP-FLOPPER…LIKE I SAID SHE'S THE ONLY ONE WHO HAS ANY BALLS TO ASK OBAMA QUESTIONS ABOUT HIS RECORD..WE ALL KNOW THE NEWS MEDIA SEEMS TO BE AFRAID TO ASK OBAMA ANYTHING. I HOPE YOU ALL GET EGG ON YOUR FACE JUST LIKE YOU DID IN THE NEW HAMPSHIRE PRIMARY.

Carrie   February 5th, 2008 6:13 pm ET

Today, Obama supporters care about the votes, not debates or name calling.

John   February 5th, 2008 6:12 pm ET

If Hillary debates herself it should be a good one because she never gives a straight answer and when she does she lies. Just think about the one debate she gave 2 different answers with in 5 minutes. I would love to see Hillary debate Hillary.

Jose Card - Independent   February 5th, 2008 6:12 pm ET

Hillary knows she will lose or not win on Super Tuesday so she is dragging on and on. Her robot talk needs not to be repeated weekly.

First, she said Obama are good running mate and now she wants to tag herself on him longer by offering to debate once per week.

Hillary thinks she is bigger than the party so she won't let go of Obama to fight against McCain.

President Carter and Senator Kennedy saw through the Clintons and made an easy choice – Obama.

Michael   February 5th, 2008 6:11 pm ET

Same old Clinton tactics…I never realize how 'slime ball like' they are. They are like the Patriots, they will do anything to win, even cheat. This family is about as dangerous as the Bush family. I am ashamed of ever voting for Bill. I guess not only will I never vote for a Bush, but I will never vote for a Clinton again.

This is not sports Clintons, no more dynasties!!! If you want one, move to China Hillary! You losers took campaign money from them before, maybe they will have you. Good riddens!

Peace   February 5th, 2008 6:10 pm ET

Obama has to make a lot of trips so that people see him physically and know him well. Hillary does not need that as most people recognise the name Clinton and know her. Why should Obama rescheduled his plan and abide to her request, That is bulldozing!

VJ, Ohio   February 5th, 2008 6:09 pm ET

Yes! Hillary is winning all of the debates that I watched so far. Obama never provide more specifics in detail for his plans, rather fumbles by diverting general statements, which I am not able to buy on it. I am sure, lack of experience is making him to not to accecept this challenge of vigorous debates.

Go Hillary! Go! We need you in WhiteHouse to cleanup the mess that Bush left us as his legacy.

MartyGee   February 5th, 2008 6:09 pm ET

Gov. Brown of CA was doing well and a threat to Bill Clinton in the 1992 primary in NY. Governor Clinton suggested a series of debates (my memory is something like five debates in a week to 10 day period).
Foolishly, Gov Brown thought himself an excellent debater.
He crammed day and night prepping for these debates. Governor Clinton ignored debate prep and instead used all this time campaigning throughout NY state.
The debates had no impact (although Gov. Brown WAS an excellent debater) while the personal appearances of Bill Clinton were evidently effective.

So – maybe 2 debates both to be held in sunbelt so that immediatedly preceeding or following these debates huge outdoor rallies to be held. Neither to be allowed on Fox.
2 hour format better than 90 minutes and format to be agreed on stresssing candidates questioning each other. The last half hour or 45 minutes of second debate likely to have Sen. Clinton desperate and taking huge risks.

Jr., California   February 5th, 2008 6:09 pm ET

More debates will just favor Obama. People are getting to know about the man. And the more you put this man in front of the world, the better. Hillary is yesterday's news. WE WANT SOMEONE NEW!!! HAVEN'T YOU HEARD? CAN YOU SMELL WHAT BAROCK IS COOKIN'?

Independent for Obama   February 5th, 2008 6:08 pm ET

This is obviously Clinton trying to pull Barack off of the Campaign Trail. In head-to-head campaigning, she will lose.

I hope the world can see this:

With Hillary Clinton, this election is about her and her ego. How many times do you hear her saying the word "I" in speeches?

With Barack Obama, this election is about US. How many times does he use the word "WE" in speeches?

The distinction is clear.

YES WE CAN! YES WE CAN! YES WE CAN!

dan   February 5th, 2008 6:08 pm ET

Hillary is smart to request this. She knows that Obama will falter if he has to go off his carefully scripted grand "Kennedy" messages and really answer a question — for example, about how it is that health care plan is superior if, as independent economicsts have analyzed,, it would cost 25% more than he says but cover 50% fewer people than Hillary's. Obama lovers are niave.

Will   February 5th, 2008 6:08 pm ET

Sen. Clinton sunk herself by crying again! Who wants a President always crying. That trick backfire, now you see she will say or do anything to win. Obama should not debate her, silence is deadly. Let her make her case one on one with her supporter. Hillary by your own airtime! Rumble young man Rumble!!!!! Go OBAMA Go!!!!!!!!!

rafael   February 5th, 2008 6:07 pm ET

Does girl power comes from CRYING?

Truth   February 5th, 2008 6:06 pm ET

Hillary doesn't get it.

It is the inspiration, stupid!

oliver   February 5th, 2008 6:05 pm ET

Candidates are campaigning for the benefit of the country, aren't they? So one can see this campaign as politics already. If we judge both candidates by how they behave and what they choose to do and say in this pretty stressful period, it seems Obama handles the situation more sensibly than her. She's already made big tactical mistakes during this campaign. Calling for one debate a week shows everyone she's panicking. Another wrong move. In these moments of her life that require fast and lucid reaction, her experience and knowledge are not used wisely.

Becky Montgomery   February 5th, 2008 6:03 pm ET

As a Texas voter, I am hoping to see Obama IN PERSON, and don't want that chance diminished by a debate rehashing the same points. Hillary tries to overstep her time and says the same things over and over. If we are going to debate, let's talk about listing her "35 years" of experience and talk about how less than a year of that was serving the Children's organization. Let's debate the 15 years making money at a law firm. Let's RELEASE all the documents she wants to keep sealed. Let's go over all the scandals. She wants to debate because Obama is a gentleman and doesn't bring these things up. McCain won't mind talking about them at all.

I have submitted many things that never get posted; hoping this one makes it.

Intellectuals   February 5th, 2008 5:55 pm ET

Hillary should debate herself……with all the flip-flops she has had …

Obama '09-17

SS   February 5th, 2008 5:54 pm ET

dear Andrew from above…………….that is too bad that there is one Republican based network on tv in Fox. not all networks need to babble on and on about the dems and universal healthcare and vacating Iraq!! fox presents more of a fair view on politics than does cnn who screams liberal all the time.

Chris   February 5th, 2008 5:53 pm ET

Obama as Plato and Clinton as Aristotle? The photo accompanying this story closely resembles the two philosophers at the focus of Raphael's "School of Athens." Obama's idealism contrasted with Clinton's realism? An amusing and thought-provoking coincidence.

gus in mia   February 5th, 2008 5:53 pm ET

i think its a great idea to have some deeper input on their views, and see who changes their story from week to week. truth is both would be great, then again anyone thats not a republican would be great!!! even ross perot!!!

Tou, Minnesota   February 5th, 2008 5:52 pm ET

This isn't a Highschool Debate Club, it's the Presidential Primary. Instead of calling for debates, Hillary should be out there speaking to people to let them know her message and her differences from Bill. It's time to get votes and to quit instigating arguments with your Democratic colleague and trying to make yourself look better. This isn't reality TV and she's not on The Apprentice. Quit with the smear tactics and playground fights. It's us, the people that matter, not her opponent. Right now, it should be about the issues affecting the people of the United States, not the issues that she has against her opponent. We already had 17 Democratic debates. If she didn't get her word out in those debates, 100 more doesn't make any difference. Enough with the talk, we demand action.

nj   February 5th, 2008 5:52 pm ET

are you OBAMA supporters affraid of a debate!!!! LETS GO HILLARY!!! LETS GO HILLARY!!!!

Lourdes   February 5th, 2008 5:52 pm ET

The obama haters are on fire tonight….must be worried about the Clintons losing steam. For those of you who say Obama has no substance, it's because you'e so used to hearing everything wrapped up in easy to digest sound-bytes that you resent having to do any work to understand what he's saying. Just because he's not SIMPLE, just because he explores the COMPLEXITY that truly defines all of the important issues we are facing, doesn't mean his rhetoric is empty. Go out and read his books…..especially the first one, which he wrote before coming into the spotlight…then perhaps your opinion on what the guy stands for will sound more like Clinton mongering hate-talk.

Obama 08 all the way.

For Hillary   February 5th, 2008 5:52 pm ET

Hillary – if Obama agrees to more debates would you please ask him to tell the voters who he is, what he is all about. What he has done for Illinois since he has been their representative and what his voting record has been. We know he points out what he thinks you have done wrong, but has he done anything wrong? Or maybey he is another Bush who would never accept responsibility for HIS decision to go to war and to stay there till this very day. Obama is all talk and pretty speaches, but that will get America no place with people who want to kill us. We need strong, smart leadership. Hillary is that experienced person.

Hillary for President.

Misha   February 5th, 2008 5:52 pm ET

Rick made the suggestion to make each debate about a single subject..

1-Health Care
2-Balancing the Budget
3-International Affairs
4-Education and NCLB

********************
I could actually appreciate this type of format. It would really force both candidates to talk about the subject in an in-depth and meaningful way. No quick one-liners or dancing around the subject just to get to the next!

Eric   February 5th, 2008 5:50 pm ET

I agree that there's almost too much sensory overload for debates right now. That being said, I really enjoyed the last debate they had in Los Angeles. It was civil and driven by the issues. Those debates I can handle. The negative name calling debates are atrocious.

While I'm on this thread I'll let everyone know I voted for Hillary today. She will do everything that Barack Obama says he'll do and she'll do it more efficiently, faster, and with more substantial results. I like Barack, and I'll vote for him if he gets the nod, for I think he would do an fine job. I just think Hillary will be better. I'm from California, I'm an independent, I'm young, and I'm a man. Who says I can't vote for Hillary?

Charlotte   February 5th, 2008 5:49 pm ET

Eileen, and they say Hillary supporters are uneducated white women? I understand Obamas' being against debates, he needs a pulpit ,with no questions please! He is the best at Rallys. I'm not impressed by endorsements nor pulpit politics. I am one of 5 million absentee voters in California, I voted for HILLARY and NO I haven't changed my mind .

Ardnuas   February 5th, 2008 5:49 pm ET

We already know their positions………… please NO more debates!!!!
This is why she is a divider, SHE LOVES TO FIGHT WITH PEOPLE…. They are going to give the same answers to the same questions over, and over again. This women wants to fight with the republicans !!!!!!

Bukky   February 5th, 2008 5:49 pm ET

Why does Hillary think she can dictate Obama's schedule?

TJ   February 5th, 2008 5:49 pm ET

Could be a good idea. Since she wants us to remember her husbands administration maybe then someone could ask her about Travel-gate, NAFTA and Mr. Foster. And, if she has studied the Universal health plan in Canada and the UK and how her's will differ and be successful.

Frank   February 5th, 2008 5:48 pm ET

Hillary is going him a favor by giving him some practice so that in case he get the nomination, the Republicans don't just chew him up and spit him out in small pieces! This guy is in no shape or form ready for a debate with the other party; if he gets the Democratic nomination, we are definitely looking at another 8 years of Republicans in the White House! What a tragedy and what a tragedy to see so many Americans clueless about what makes a candidate strong!

Sam   February 5th, 2008 5:47 pm ET

I don't see a reason for this many more debates. The last one was a snooze fest. I guess in the leadup to a national election, they might get a little more animated, but this seems like a transparent attempt by the Clinton campaign to play on her strengths. She delivers the applause lines that Obama stays away from.

Lucy   February 5th, 2008 5:47 pm ET

I have noticed that CNN posts more ProBama comments than ProClinton comments. Why is this? Isn't this one of the things we are supposed to be CHANGING?!?!?

Scott, Royal Oak   February 5th, 2008 5:47 pm ET

Whenever someone like "Adam" at 4:36 tries to rudely characterize all Obama supporters as "naive", I like to point out the fact that, statistically, Obama supporters have obtained a higher level of education and earn more income.

We're not all a bunch of sheep, buddy. Just because his speeches are inspirational and he is about 90 times more personable than Hillary doesn't mean he's an empty suit.

I've read his book. I've read his plans, including his health care plan, and I find them more convincing than Hillary's and less likely to be manipulated by the Republicans in the general election.

Also, let's not forget, there are not these MAJOR policy differences between Barack and Hillary that you try to suggest. I perceive Obama to be a more intelligent, capable, and frankly, less corrupt politician. That's why he's getting my vote.

Please do not insult me and other Obama supporters with your unfounded generalizations and your nasty way of presenting them!

Tiff   February 5th, 2008 5:47 pm ET

Sorry Hill camp, demanding another debate is not a good sign for you kids.

I think what happens today will be more than enough. Let the people speak!

Dan   February 5th, 2008 5:46 pm ET

Trying to have frequent debates is a good strategy for Hillary. She does well one-on-one and far and away won the last debate before Super Tuesday. She has command of all of the issues, and manages to convey substance and incorporate details in her concise responses and rebuttals. Although Obama may be an inspirational speaker in his prepared speeches, I do not feel that he is nearly so adept at debating effectively and thinking on his feet. The more debates, the better for both candidates to better define their differences, goals and plans for the future of the country.

PDA   February 5th, 2008 5:46 pm ET

Question – Why do so many of you hate Hillary? I just don't understand – do you somehow feel threatened by her intellect? What has she done personally to you? By the way I voted for Obama today – not joyfully but because there are just too many things about Hillary I just couldn't get past. But I can honestly say that I don't hate her.

jean   February 5th, 2008 5:46 pm ET

the only experience I hear that Obama has is in thestreets of Chicago. Hillary has the RESUME…. a good one. I'd hire her.

Renee   February 5th, 2008 5:46 pm ET

Every time he debates, he gets better and has more opportunity to explain his positions. Hopefully, he can quiet all these people who say he has no substance (that do not bother to log on his website and READ his positions)

Jim, OR   February 5th, 2008 5:45 pm ET

If Hillary is such a great debater as all her little minions here claim, please explain why her numbers have been on the decline for the past 2 months when it seems like we've had a debate every week to 10 days. Is she hoping that we will all suddenly fall in love with her cackle? If we are going to more of them, let's have an actual debate. I've been in debates and none of these are really debates. How about the same rules as the Lincoln-Douglas Debates. (You remember those? Tall skinny guy from Illinois with "no experience" who turned out to be our greatest President…)

Barbara   February 5th, 2008 5:44 pm ET

His indecisin on wether to debate each week is just like His "present" votes as senator. If Obama knows where the problems are in this country and knows the solutions than he needs to debate Hillary Clinton and stop hesitating.

Magellan - SC   February 5th, 2008 5:44 pm ET

No way. We have heard a lot already. It is clear and we now where everyone stands on all issues. Another debate will only be full of retorique questions.
Given that Hillary is the one asking for debates, She must be on a hot seat, scared because the lead has vanished away and that the momentum is shifting on the other side.

No more debate is necessary. Let the winner win.

Carl   February 5th, 2008 5:43 pm ET

Too much…too little…too late.

How about a compromise maybe everyother week.

The people need to hear from each of them on their
own platflorm not some commentators debate.

Natalie   February 5th, 2008 5:43 pm ET

Ah, smart move Hillary… wrap him in debates so he can lose his momentum while you go on the attack hoping he will slip up.

Hilary is running scared because everyone said the last debate was a tie, and even a win for Obama, when she should have won. I guess the Kumbaya is over LOL!

I have three words for Obama: Just say NO!

Ty   February 5th, 2008 5:42 pm ET

Hillary has deply all sort of tactics in this campaign.

After her loss in Iowa, there was the emotional outbreak. Right before the South Carolina, there was the tactic of "divid then conquer". Eventually she comes to term that even Kennedys do not agree with her methods. She finally tries the "high ground" imagery.

My point is that Clintons (with Bill) are in this capaign for themselves. There is no consideration for the country. Winning is the only thing they really care about.

Weekly debate will not produce any positive result. Frankly, people may be turned off if they are bombarded with the same message. Both candidates have similar positions on most policies. To parse over every nuances is not necessary.

She lacks of authenticity to be a true public servant. We need someone who is truly thinking for the people not just in it for the win.

Texas   February 5th, 2008 5:42 pm ET

Go Senator Clinton!

Andrew   February 5th, 2008 5:42 pm ET

Oh lordie, Obama hasnt accepted a challenge in the mere couple of hours since it was levied.

Also, lets be clear, Obama has been freezing Fox out because they have openly compared him to Osama on a name basis and have been nothing short of full of bigotry and racism without apology. I say do as many debates with the other networks as you want, but the first thing a democratic president needs to do is put Fox back in its rightful place – good for tabloid-esque filler news, bad for actual news.

SS   February 5th, 2008 5:41 pm ET

you've got to be kidding me. if he rejects the call then he looks bad and if he does it is worthless. their stances on issues arent going to change and the same types of questions will be asked week after week. all that would happen is the moderator would try to stir up a controversy and start a political slug fest. enough of this crap from the hillary camp!! and whoever said obama cant debate is stupid. maybe that is because he is always defending his position on a misstep accusation from hillary! i say cast your vote for a true candidate…..a true conservative……..McCain '08!

Hard worker 9   February 5th, 2008 5:40 pm ET

I'm a black male and would love to see the day there is a black presedent, but I would have to admit I don't know much about Obama but he seams to be a standup guy.
People all of a sudden don't like the Clintons before obama, we where praying to get the clinton back in office.
Obama has a great chance of winning the demacratic nominie, but when it come to fight for presedency the conservertive repulicans needed to win will not vote for him, they will vote for the Clintons. I want a democratic in office and this is the first chance we had in a long time. Go Hillary

KB   February 5th, 2008 5:40 pm ET

Of course supporters are afraid to have Obama debate over the real issues…Anyone that says he has been rocking the debates, hasn't been watching them. While Obama hasn't been doing poorly in the debates (ala Ron Paul), he simply hasn't been able to match Hilary's step in them. She has been concise and deliberate. She has shown the paths to the solutions that Obama continually harks on with no solutions of his own. In the last debate all he could muster as a battle cry was "I was right about Iraq, and therefore I will be right about everything else" Give me a break…

Di   February 5th, 2008 5:40 pm ET

Obama couldn't handle a debate a week….he would leave crying!!!

Go Hillary Go!!!

Karen from Minnesota   February 5th, 2008 5:40 pm ET

Last night on the Hallmark channel Hillary had a town hall covering her stand on a variety of issues. I was so proud to be a part of this meeting even tho it was via TV. What have we heard from Obama besides sound bites?

A lot of great speech -making, good use of sound bites but I still do not know what he stands for. What does he stand for?

If he is the nominee he will have to be more specific or the Republicans will eat him alive. This is a first for me: giving the Republican nominee a look-see. I would hate to vote for a Republican because of the potential of two vacancies on the Supreme Court. We do not need any more Republican appointees.

Go Hillary, we need you!

Patrick   February 5th, 2008 5:39 pm ET

Hillary destroys Obama in every debate!!

CLINTON 08!!

Jolly Potter   February 5th, 2008 5:39 pm ET

These so-called debates are not really debates at all. In my Senior year I was Chairman of the Debating Society and we had real debates where one person took a position on an issue and was asked to defend that position and the other person took the opposite point of view and defended that position.

i dont see a lot of that in these debates so i would like to propose a motion as follows:

This house believes that Senator Clinton's vote on Iraq to give President Bush authority to declare War on iraq was a grave error of misjudgment.

For the motion: Senator Barack Obama (5 minutes)

Against the motion: Senator Hilary Clinton (5 minutes)

Chairman: Tim Russert

Each have a 2 minute summing up rebuttal

A panel as well as Viewers then cast a vote on the relative arguments

Why can't we have this kind of debate ?

Peggy   February 5th, 2008 5:39 pm ET

these comments are so sad, im beginning to really dislike america

Chris   February 5th, 2008 5:39 pm ET

Of course she wants to debate, CNN & Blitzer in particular, are obviously biased. How many times did he ask Barak "Is that a swipe at Sen. Clinton?" 2-3 by my count. How many times did he ask Hillary "Is that a swipe at Sen. Obama?" You guessed it, a big fat "0″!!

Do we expect a FOX debate to be any more "Fair and Balanced"? I doubt it.
Think of the ratings (read: fired up Repub. Base) that FOX will get if Hillary get the Nomination. 24/7 Hillary trashing is a windfall for FOX and the Repub. Party.

With McCain as the Likely Nominee, the Conservatives are not as fired up(I understand the VP Nod could change this) as they would be. The only way for the Repubs to bridge this gap is for Democrats to unite their party for them. Hillary WILL unite them.

THIS WILL HURT THE DOWN TICKET RACES, even IF she CAN win the general.

ann esposiro   February 5th, 2008 5:39 pm ET

Obama you should accept the challenge that Hillary is offering you for future debates. If you don't it will appear that you are backing down. Ask Oprah to help you. If she is not available you can always ask Ted Kennedy.

DS   February 5th, 2008 5:39 pm ET

Do you ever wonder what is wrong with people who think "what more could they possibly say?" The point of a debate is not to hear in the basest terms what each candidate thinks about a given issue, but to begin to grasp which candidates understand, analyze, and think about the difficult and sometimes incredibly complex issues that will be faced by a leader of any kind (government or otherwise).

The greatest thinkers of any generation could spend YEARS discussing moral and political issues (and have… think Hawthorne, Jefferson, Thoreau…these men made a LIVING on the lecture circuit discussing just these issues) and not at any point come to a conclusion or an end. Finding out where someone stands on complex issues is more than making a simple black and white statement about what you believe… and THAT is what is wrong with politics in this country. We think there are simple answers to anything…and the truth is a person's qualification to lead is learned over time…tested and re-tested.

The more we see of these candidates (both of whom I bear powerful respect for) opnly discussing their views on some of the most difficult questions of our time, the better, if you ask me.

Rollin   February 5th, 2008 5:38 pm ET

It's ridiculous. Afraid? Hiding from the issues? What about the other 10 debates they have already had? Including the last one not so long ago. Is there something more that you expect to find?

One thing that is ridiculous is people adopt the mantra of Obama is inspirational but I don't know what he stands for so there's nothing there. That is just crazy. He has stood before you and answered every question asked. He went tit for tat with Hillary during the last debate comparing their plans and philosophies, everything one said, the other had their version, so there is no way you can say you don't know what he stands for.

He has been as clear as HRC has and if you don't believe so I would ask you to point out to me what HRC has been clear on that Obama has not.

Josh   February 5th, 2008 5:38 pm ET

What else could they possible discuss? They have already had 18 I think.

madeleine   February 5th, 2008 5:38 pm ET

It doesn't seem to me that we need so many more debates at this time
but certainly it won't hurt Obama. He's been showing pose and intelligence in
every debate so far. Clinton's stern and very strong position on issues is a bit scary
in the sense that she doesn't appear like someone who can take advice from or listen
to other people.
Words are cheap. There are 2 facts to remember: she voted for the war
and she and Bill weren't able to improve our health care system while in office.
Time for Obama!

Linda   February 5th, 2008 5:37 pm ET

Scaredy cat? Does that comment reflect the overall maturity of Hillary supporters?

Personally, I won't watch four more debates. They've been fascinating, but I have other ways to spend my time. One or two more would be plenty.

I've read many comments that Obama should run again in eight years. Have you actually contemplated what the United States could look like after eight more years of the Clintons? Do you honestly believe a Democrat would have a chance at the White House? We'd be more likely to get Jeb Bush.

Obama is ready to lead and the time is now. If we wait, it will be too late.

(And a note to all of Hillary's supporters. Please answer this: What's democratic about the same family controlling the White House for sixteen years?)

bridgette   February 5th, 2008 5:37 pm ET

I am debated out. I have watched them all. Republicans and Democrats and I can't take a debate a week. They both have been very specific about what they want to accomplish. So lets not do that.

I don't understand why she wants to do that. But that just sound plain crazy to me.

bob   February 5th, 2008 5:36 pm ET

Desperation at its worst. I can't believe people are trying to spin it any other way.

Whatever.

Daniel   February 5th, 2008 5:36 pm ET

Go Hillary.

Barak is so sensitive. Everything is on his terms. Hillary goes out and does things even if she doesn't want to. It's part of the job.

Hillary all the way. Also she does make him look dumb.

ConsiderThis   February 5th, 2008 5:36 pm ET

How about a series of debates between Michele Obama and Bill Clinton. Now, that would be worth watching!

Crystal   February 5th, 2008 5:36 pm ET

Why Hillary? Just why? A debate a week is just too much for the American people to digest, especially if we have to take in your condescending attitude. What you are trying to do is inject confusion, misquote, and misrepresent, as usual. Win at any cost, huh Hills? Lord help us. We need change.

Go Obama!!!!!!!

SC Tyler   February 5th, 2008 5:36 pm ET

Great idea Hillary. Obama's Camp is scared of this idea because he can't debate. Everything that comes out of his mouth is garbage. The only thing Obama talks about is the Iraq vote. I wish he would stop because he can't change my mind. I'm with Hillary til the end..

Hillary '08

Farrell, Houston, Tx   February 5th, 2008 5:35 pm ET

Did Hillary ask Obama if she could caucas in Michigan and Florida. The answer is no. The debate is closed and not up for further discussion.

ann esposiro   February 5th, 2008 5:34 pm ET

Hillary Clinton only voted for the war in Iraq because she was given misinformation by the Bush administration. She has long since retracted her stance on Iraq once it was obvious this was Bush's war. She has been consistant in her desire to end the war in a timely manner. Yet there are many who are not listening. It is my opinion that Hillary Clinton is a true American and has the deep conviction to bring respect back to the United States of America. She has true leadership qualities and has the ability to turn this country around and undo the mess that Bush is leaving us with. Her intelligence, calm manner, and steadiness under pressure leaves me no other choice but to say she has the qualities of a "true winner".

Heather M.   February 5th, 2008 5:34 pm ET

You know… I can't help but wonder…

Men complain enough about women wanting to "talk" too much about everything- is this really the image they want to project for her?

(Mostly said in humor… but only mostly…)

Rob   February 5th, 2008 5:34 pm ET

Let's talk about identity politics. My wife was a Silicon Valley executive and now teaches while raising two children. (Me, I support her for president… off topic.) She identifies heavily with Hillary Clinton and takes the Primary competition with Obama personally to the point she cannot see any positive aspects of Obama.

I'm convinced many of Clinton's and Obama's supporters are equally embittered by the contest so that, no matter who our ultimate nominee, vital constituencies in the Democratic coalition are likely to pout and abstain. Don't do it! Let's be adult in our our own best interests. Let's vote, volunteer and commit to the party.

Let's understand this for what it is: The 2,008 General Presidential Election is the last opportunity to reclaim the country for ALL of us. ALL of our interests are best served by a president who will work for progress for working people, for disfranchised minorities (women AND ethnic interests) and for the restoration of our constitutional and democratic institutions and liberties. If we don't unite behind whichever candidate prevails, another Republican administration will be positioned to complete Bush's systematic destruction of America.

beth   February 5th, 2008 5:34 pm ET

Great Idea to Emphasize her strengths.. Now she can clear up all the untruths going around get all the facts!..

Dowell   February 5th, 2008 5:33 pm ET

I feel that Obama is the best at Debates…he is not pre-wired…he is authentic…every debate…I see him as being like me…and that makes me give more money…every time…It makes me travel back and forth on the east coast getting people educated about what we all can do…through Obama…

ABC   February 5th, 2008 5:33 pm ET

buh-bye Hillary

give it up, you're only prolonging the agony

Obama will win, now and in November

Yes We Can

Bob, Florida - RFO   February 5th, 2008 5:33 pm ET

The question about debates verses speeches is irrelevant as a measure of candidate’s qualifications to be President of the United States. Debates make sense at lower government levels such as District Representatives, school boards, County Councils, Mayors, etc.

At the Presidential level debates is mainly a method to try and define some form of comparison with easy criteria that layman can understand. It’s the equivalent of a beauty pageant or criminal lineup! During the State of the Union address President Bush did not get up and debate congress he delivered a speech!

If debates are an important aspect of being President then we need to change to a parliamentary system where a Prime Minister routinely debates the opposition party during Prime Minister's question time!

Hillary, as a "policy wonk" is very good at the detail. However I question her ability to get past the "I hate Republicans" frame of view. She will make a perfect cabinet secretary but has too narrow a point of view to be anything else!

Go Barack '08

Tran   February 5th, 2008 5:33 pm ET

I believe that Hillary is smart but she 's not that smart and strong enough to be the United State President. Please think twice before you vote.

julie   February 5th, 2008 5:33 pm ET

Clinton has seen the polls and done the math. She is going to lose. She knows it. Now she wants to break the Democratic boycott of Fox and get Barack off the campaign trail and away from the voters. The more people see him, the more they like him. The more people see her, the less they like her — which is why she came in third in Iowa.

Dave   February 5th, 2008 5:33 pm ET

Barack raised $32 million in January. Hillary raised $14 million. She's desperate and will do anything to get more support. Sorry Hillary, the politics of hate and divisiveness are out, and unity and hope are in. Go Obama '08!!!

brian   February 5th, 2008 5:32 pm ET

hundreds of millions gone already for this election…mmm…i wonder what a few hundred million would do in darfur? since we obviously don't care, lets flush many more greenbacks down the #### receptacle with a bunch of pointless, say nothing debates and see what comes out the other end. remember folks, all we get from these debates is just that – a bunch of crap!

PAC   February 5th, 2008 5:32 pm ET

It appears to me that alot of people in this country have forgotten the good times we all had when President Bill Clinton was in office.  The country was out of the red and into the black with a surplus.  Do you not feel that the President had at that time gone to Hillary and asked her opionion on issues he was contimplating on to turn the country around?  Everyone should know that Hillary is a very intelligent woman who was a member of the National Honor Society and a leader in her school years.  I honestly feel that she helped her husband, now she can help all of us and turn this country around.  I believe in Hillary Clinton and feel that she is our best choice to help our troubling country.

Matt   February 5th, 2008 5:32 pm ET

What are they going to talk about??

Neither of them has any experience worth mentioning.

Ande   February 5th, 2008 5:32 pm ET

How many times does America really want to see those two debate????

Hillary needs to stop all of this She just needs to rest that voice of hers. She is starting to sound like a very old lady who smokes way too much.

JT   February 5th, 2008 5:32 pm ET

Go Hillary! Take the House! Obama wont do this… It exposes his lack of experience or "real" ability to manage government. He is a great motivational speaker, and a politician for politicians. He would be yet another elected official to promise the world, and deliver nothing. Obama can save his speaches. We need someone who can inspire but more importantly, actually deliver. It was the last Clinton who pulled this country out of federal deficit and recessionary economics, it will take another to get us out. Obama would give everyone a great speach while they lose their homes, lose their jobs, etc. But is that what people want?

Im ready to place my vote.

Bob, Florida - RFO   February 5th, 2008 5:31 pm ET

Debates verses speeches are irrelevant as a measure of candidate’s qualifications to be President of the United States. Debates make sense at lower government levels such as District Representatives, school boards, County Councils, Mayors, etc.

At the Presidential level debates is mainly a method to try and define some form of comparison with easy criteria that [We the people ...] can understand. It’s the equivalent of a beauty pageant or criminal lineup! During the State of the Union address President Bush get up and debate congress he delivered a speech!

If debates are an important aspect of being President then we need to change to a parliamentary system where a Prime Minister routinely debates the opposition party during Prime Minister's question time!

Hillary, as a "policy wonk" is very good at the detail. However I question her ability to get past the "I hate Republicans" frame of view.

She will make a perfect cabinet secretary but has too narrow a point of view to be anything else!

Go Barack '08

Gigi   February 5th, 2008 5:31 pm ET

Why on earth would we want a debate a week?? One when all the questions would be on the most pertinent subjects is enough . . . if they would only stay on topic and actually answer the questions. Is that too much to ask for?

ao   February 5th, 2008 5:31 pm ET

FEATURE THE MIT STUDY ABOUT CLINTON AND OBAMA HEALTH CARE PLANS – LET SOUND SCIENCE AND RESEARCH BE HEARD!!! LET THE TRUTH BE SPOKEN!!! HILLARY IS RIGHT ON MARK WITH HER COST, WHICH ACTUALLY IS LOWER THAN OBAMA'S WITH BETTER RESULTS (ACTUALLY EVERYONE COVERED). THIS IS A SCIENTIFIC FACT BASED ON SOUND RESEARCH AT MIT – BEFORE CRITICIZING ME, CHECK IT FOR YOURSELF!!!

Harry   February 5th, 2008 5:30 pm ET

The more debates, the better. So far Hillary hasn't been up to snuff. The only thing that'll tick me off is if they agree to anything on FOX. The democrats should never legitimize the Republican Propaganda machine called FoxNews. Nor should they agree to any debate during the general election on FoxNoise. They'll never be fair, and it makes them money.

Carl   February 5th, 2008 5:30 pm ET

Too much…too little…too late.

How about a compromise maybe everyother week.

The people need to hear from each of them on their
own platflorm not some commentators debate.

Robert in Albuquerque   February 5th, 2008 5:30 pm ET

you know what I find sad.. DEMS tearing the part apart. Hillary AND Obama supporters are making me sick with the hate posts.

Latinos for OBAMA   February 5th, 2008 5:30 pm ET

Do I hear desperation in her voice? She's terrified that Obama has caught up so quickly. Why else would she ask for more debates?

America is looking for a new, fresh face in office. God knows theres nothing new and fresh about the Clintons!

I'm an independent and have voted democrat in the last few years. If Obama doesn't win this race (which by the way would only be possible through manipulation by the powerful Hillbill machinery), I WILL VOTE AGAINST HER in November.

Democrats need to vote wisely unless, they want another 8 years of Republicans in the office.

Anthony Sampson   February 5th, 2008 5:29 pm ET

This is my 3 cent response. Barack's opponents are desperate. We, the American people have spoken. We love Obama. What are they trying to prove? Madam H., we are not interested in your revenge on your hubby. And what would you call him the first man or would you be the first lady regardless of your outcome in the poles. The domestic roles are twisted far enough. Let us move on. I love you and Bill but lets go our seperate ways.

3 Cents,

Anthony

Lisa   February 5th, 2008 5:28 pm ET

Clinton was the leader of her Debate Team at Wellesley. But in this case, you can have all the debate skills in the world, and still not be a good candidate

MAMA's for OBAMA!!!

Obama 08

Stephen   February 5th, 2008 5:28 pm ET

i think Hillary should be careful,she seems not to learn from her mistakes;she figures that more debates will favour her because she is perceived to perform better than Obama in debates…but maybe she should remember that she will be facing an ever growing in confidence Obama who also seems to learn fast,i saw the debate at the Kodak Theather…and there is no way she was winning that one,i think Obama was the one driving home the points;i say the Obama camp should accept this challenge,they have nothing to loose,Obama debates so well……

BlackScorpio   February 5th, 2008 5:28 pm ET

By all the comments thus far, I can tell for the most part people are like sheep… they will follow whoever is telling them what they want to hear. Obama makes a pretty speech and touts how he was always against the war in Iraq… like someone else pointed out, it is SO EASY for him to say that now when he WAS NOT in the Senate to cast a vote in the first place. Lots of people in America were against the war in Iraq, but we didn't have a vote. The media has given Obama a free ride – no doubt because is a Black man and they don't want to seem to be conducting a "high tech lynching." I'm for Senator Clinton – but trust me, if Obama gets the nomination over Clinton, then you will all be crying come November because we WILL have another Republican in the white house.

cici   February 5th, 2008 5:28 pm ET

CLINTONS – just go back to Arkansas. No more presidential dynasties. A new day….go OBAMA.

M. Brathwaite, Virgin Islands   February 5th, 2008 5:28 pm ET

Positive Clinton headlined stories has ran all day and I for one has notice how there are so many last minute positive stories of Clinton all over the web media. I believe its an attempt to influence last minute undeciders in her favor as there were a large percentage of undeciders in places like california and New Jersey.

As usual the coniving prejudice american media at work with their subtle racism.

Bob, Roxboro, NC   February 5th, 2008 5:28 pm ET

Perhaps debates not sponsored in any part by news outlets would provide better information. Sorry CNN, but when I watched Wolf Blitzer cut Ron Paul off so abruptly while allowing Mcain and Romney to grimace and have unfettered speaking,,, I was appalled.

These debates are news worthy no matter who sponsors them. Having corporate news have control, undermines the credibility.

Randy - Denver   February 5th, 2008 5:27 pm ET

I am not really surprised she is asking for more debates, whe knows a few things. First if he refuses (since we have covered their two major differences over and over and over again) her supporters will say he is scared to debate her because they feel she is a stronger debater (I do not think so but that will be the line). Second she knows that it really will not matter much because after the second or third one people will stop tuning in and he will be wasting time in these "debates" and not out where people can see him so she wins again. Of course if the debates are on specific subjects instead of wasting time type questions (dream ticket.. as if those who support Mr. Change want Ms. More of the same on their ticket) it might be acceptable but in all honesty the debates so far have been basically pointless…

Constance F. Brown   February 5th, 2008 5:27 pm ET

Why more debates?

I truly do not think it is necessary.

Personally, I will not change my vote. I am steadfast and unmoveable!

I think that Mrs. Clinton is wonderful, but I have decided and that is that.

Thank you

Janel, St. Paul, MN   February 5th, 2008 5:27 pm ET

Senator Clinton,

If you are still in the race four weeks out, then Senator Obama should debate you. He won last time. . .and he'll win again.

Obama 08!!!!

jkbowman   February 5th, 2008 5:26 pm ET

In other words, "You're surging — I'm losing the fund race — I think I need the free TV."

That said, I'm all for giving free airtime to the candidates. But let's give them 20 minutes a week each to speak directly to the American people without distortion. Debates are informative, but they're sound bites of defense and spin. They're usually decided not by who has the best and most clear vision, but who gets in the most cheap shots. — I'd like to see the race get away from that.

Mark in Austin   February 5th, 2008 5:26 pm ET

I'm fairly surprised at how divided the democratic party is right now. Both the main candidates are truly great, yet based on the comments here, it seems that you if you like one of the candidates you hate the other. Personally I support Hillary because I think she is the most informed of the two candidates (and quite frankly, the Barack Obama media blitz has made me feel a bit like a tool), but I would not hesitate to vote for him in the general election should he get the nod. To all the Obama supporters out there (i.e., Hillary haters), please examine why you hate Hillary so much. Is it just because she is running against Obama? Regardless of who wins the nomination, I hope we can come together to put a democrat in the WH in '08.

B, USA   February 5th, 2008 5:26 pm ET

THIS WOMAN WOULD DO ANYTHING TO GGET ELECTED ! IS THIS SUPPOSED TO BE A FEBRUARY SURPRISE ? OBAMA SHOULD AGREE TO IT ONE THE CONDITION THAT DICK MORRIS AND SEAN HANNITY BEALLOWEDTO BE PART OF THE MODERATORS

Shereef   February 5th, 2008 5:26 pm ET

Dear Dennis;

This is the internet! Please leave your common sense at home. It may disrupt the space time continumn.

Joanne, Indianapolis   February 5th, 2008 5:26 pm ET

I'm confused. If Hillary is winning in the debates, how come he's gaining in the polls?
Anyone?

Robin Durrance   February 5th, 2008 5:26 pm ET

Hey – thanks again to the Obama Campaign for firming up my support for Hillary. A wise and experienced candidate has already thought of the responses, reactions and consequences for the hypotheticals. I bet the HRC campaign already knew the Obama camp would have to ponder the offer.

Rollin   February 5th, 2008 5:26 pm ET

A debate a week is a LOT of rehashing of the same issues and would not be productive. I don not really believe there would be any point to it. A strategy like that would work only to HRC's benefit, since she started as the "anointed one" and began at the top of the polls based on name recognition alone.

Such a strategy would take Obama away from what he needs to do – campaign. In every state in which Obama has spent a significant amount of time the poll numbers have changed drastically. You have to prepare for debates and fly to wherever they are being held. With primaries every few days after Super Tuesday, only Hillary stands to benefit, and THAT would she would want to keep Obama off the road.

Look at how the numbers have changed in California and in every other state where Obama has spent time. Hillary held on to her lead in Florida because Obama never made it there. Same thing with Michigan. It is not a rule, but it is clear the numbers change when Obama campaigns. That is what she seeks to avoid.

Give her another debate. But one a week? No, that's crazy. I mean really, the idea of campaigning once a week is just ridiculous. None of these claims of anyone is afraid. The idea is just ridiculous.

Bill Peterson   February 5th, 2008 5:26 pm ET

Of course she wants weekly debates.
Her money is drying up and her support is shrinking.
With dwindling support and no money for advertising, it makes perfect sense.
I would do the same, but Obama would be wise to be as shrewd as she is and not take the bait.

dajackg   February 5th, 2008 5:26 pm ET

So, so interesting to watch everyone project. Either Hillary only wants to debate because she's scared, or Barack DOESN'T want to debate because HE'S scared.

C'mon people. This thing isn't even CLOSE to being over.

Adarrah for Obama   February 5th, 2008 5:26 pm ET

Hillary is out of $$$. She needs to get her face in the media for free. Especially since she ecpect Obama to still all the headlines.

Obama 08′

Justin in CA   February 5th, 2008 5:25 pm ET

And if you don't know the issues by now you really don't care anyway

Smile   February 5th, 2008 5:25 pm ET

NO MORE DEBATES…….

chris   February 5th, 2008 5:25 pm ET

Hillary had won the previous debates, but Obama has been steadily improving to the point where he easily beat Hillary hands down during the last debate. This whole idea is a ploy. She wants to try stopping Obama's momentum and keep him off the campaign trail (which is what primaries are designed FOR); plus, she's doesn't have the money to compete as well on the trail. She's got nothing to lose. Plus, she's trying to corner Obama with the stupid false dilemma: if you aren't afraid, why not debate me? huh? you chicken? pathetic. And many keep buying into the calculations.

Justin in CA   February 5th, 2008 5:24 pm ET

A desperate move to say the least. I like Hillary but she will give the republicans something to rally around. She is the only person they hate more than thier own nominees.

Jordan V   February 5th, 2008 5:24 pm ET

Anyone who knows anything about debating knows it is a rhetorical tool, not really a judge of who has a better handle on the issues.

Hillary is clearly better at debates than Obama. Her speaking style is specific, and well tailored to the 30-60 second sound bites that help promote the idea that you're winning in a televised debate.

Obama clearly speaks better in speeches than Hillary. His way of working crowds and speaking lyrically is perfect for orating in front of a large group of people.

In short, Obama typically comes off better in a 15 minute speech. Hillary in a 1.5 minute speech. That doesn't imply one is a better candidate than the other; rather, it simply applies that they each have different rhetorical strengths.

In the first televised debates, between JFK and Nixon, voters listening on the radio thought Nixon had won, while voters watching the debate though JFK had won. Both audiences received the same messages from the candidates, yet perception was radically different. The implication here (and it's well known among anyone who debates regularly) is that debate is as much, if not more, in making the audience believe you're winning a simple policy debate as actually making better points.

So obviously Hillary would like to debate every week. She clearly comes off better in debates. Whether that means she's actually making better points is debatable however (pun!). Similarly, one would expect Obama to hope that they each be given the opportunity to make a speech to the American public every week.

One side-point to realize from all this is a counterpoint to the earlier comment that whoever debates better can deal with foreign leaders better. Foreign relations are about discussions between leaders. Public debates are about the audience. So don't fool yourself. If either Hillary or Obama tried to "debate" a foreign leader like they debate each other for us, it would be as big of a confrontational disaster as when Bush essentially insulted Musharaf during a Pakistani press conference.

JW   February 5th, 2008 5:23 pm ET

Again, Obama is good at make speach with transcript. Comparing to Hillary, Obama does not have edge to bring on his policy and issue discussion in debate.

We need face to face discussion between the candidate. If Obama's supporters have been accusing Clinton for "negative campaign", why they don't ask their candidate to accept the invitation for debate. That is the platform we can see the difference.

It shows how weak Obama is.

Vote for Hillary.

rafael   February 5th, 2008 5:23 pm ET

No he's not "scared" of women but you all should be scare of Bill and his many women….

John   February 5th, 2008 5:23 pm ET

Haha what a joke.

After the debates, can Hillary be forced to give a stump speech immediately following Barack? I think that will be about fair.

Or is she too scared?

She's a better debater. He's a better orator. We get it.

Lynn in St. Louis   February 5th, 2008 5:22 pm ET

The reason for having debates is to really examine the candidates' positions and be able to ask them deep questions. The reason that Obama would not want to participate is that there is no RAH RAH in debates.

Why do Obama supporters need to get nasty when it comes to Hillary Clinton. Just because I favor Hillary does not cause me to san nasty stuff about Obama.

ALL Democrats should remember that once the primaries are over and the slate is announced, ALL Democrats should support THAT slate.

kevin   February 5th, 2008 5:22 pm ET

Obamas claim to international peace keeping is "I lived overseas as a child" ! What a JOKE people wake up all he is is a Tony Robbins wanna be..

CJ   February 5th, 2008 5:22 pm ET

OMG she expects us to listen to that voice once a week?

Oops, maybe I shouldn't have said that…… don't want to hurt her fuzzy little feelings and make her cry again.

MICHELE   February 5th, 2008 5:22 pm ET

THE ISSUES ARE IMPORTANT AND I THINK THAT'S A GREAT IDEA. THIS WAY "WE THE PEOPLE" WILL GET TO MAKE A REAL INFORMED DECISION ON WHO HAS THE LEADERSHIP AND SKILLS TO RUN THIS COUNTRY. GO HILLARY ! I'M AN INDEPENDENT AND YOU HAVE MY VOTE!

Leo   February 5th, 2008 5:22 pm ET

Let's wait and see what happens today … Super Tuesday, remember? It's the day we have been waiting for. I'm not sure I understand the lack of focus. I have made my decision. I am going with Barack Obama. His words alone have inspired me to step up, work harder, and make myself a better person. This man has helped me already, without even taking office. Listen to his speeches; open your heart and hear what this man has to say. We have the opportunity to make history. We have the opportunity to unite this country like never before. Thank You! GO OBAMA!!!!!!!!

Dianne   February 5th, 2008 5:22 pm ET

It would appear that Hillary's suppoters want the debate and Obama supporters do not. Why?

Hillary does better at debates talking to panelists and Obama does better at talking to people. That being the case, Hillary should go on shows and talk about what she believes and Obama should stick to what works for him by talking to the people.

I do not believe that Hillary should decide or dictate what forum the political discourse should follow. If people want to listen to her they will watch her on television and people will go out to see Barack. They both win and we still get to decide.

Arshad   February 5th, 2008 5:22 pm ET

She is out of money. Looking for free publicity. She can't beat him on stumps as he draws 10-20000 wherever he goes. She can't match him on TV ads either. That's the only things she can do now. Keep talking!!!!!!

Dawn   February 5th, 2008 5:22 pm ET

I don't think Obama is scared to debate Hillary. I think this is simply politics. IS she going to cry to get her way. This senator is no feminist. Women want a strong candidate that is no afraid of confrontation and the real issues. She keeps talking about children and she only worked for a year with the Childrens defense fund and spent 15 years as a corporate lawyer. WOW! that's not on her website. Tell the truth and maybe people would vote for you? (that would be interesting) She just seems desperate.
Let's be real. As a democrat I will vote for McCain before I would vote for her.

Lynn in NM   February 5th, 2008 5:21 pm ET

I think she should have her debates – as long as she gives up her paycheck while she is doing all of this campaigning. Why should we be paying her salary when she isn't doing anything? I think we need a one month campaign like some of the foreign countries. They have been campaigning for 3 years now and it's getting tiresome. Do your job Hillary!

Cheryl   February 5th, 2008 5:21 pm ET

What else could they possibly have to say??? I don't think any new information will be gained from either Obama or Hillary.

We know enough, because the truth of it is that neither one of them really know what they will do in office until they get there. Unfortunate but true…and plus, they know that they can't tell americans the real truth about the state of the country, which is that all constituencies will have to make sacrifices to balance the budget and make this country financially strong again. So since Americans don't want to hear the real truth, why bother with a debate??

I'm so tired of hearing both of them say basically the same thing in different ways…..

Signed,
Please God, no republican in 2008

Remi Iloh   February 5th, 2008 5:20 pm ET

I think we should congratulates all the political aspirants for their efforts to bring back change to America in one form or the other knowing fully well that CHANGE is a gradual process and it doesn't come in a day.

Be that as it may, it is note worthy to say that, the debates conducted so far have been very relevant towards a better democratic change in the history and restoration of America.

Without mincing words, I think and I believe strongly in Hillary Clinton and there is no doubt that she is ready and interested in participating in any debate either now or in future.

Hillary is a tested and trusted candidate!

Kentucky for Obama   February 5th, 2008 5:19 pm ET

Good Grief!! What a desperate little hussy! Is she going to cry during a debate? Boo-Hoo… Vote for me..I'm sliding in the polls…Boo-Hoo! That would be the only "new" thing she can do. We've already heard her spiel…ad nauseum. Stand your ground, Obama!

Mark   February 5th, 2008 5:19 pm ET

Far from being "afraid" (you people can only WISH he were afraid), Senator Obama is simply TOO SMART to take Hillary's ridiculous bait! Those of you on here claiming Obama is "afraid" to debate Hillary simply demonstrate your shocking level of political ignorance. Do you really fail to understand that, if the shoe were on the other foot, Hillary and her advisers would run from a similar challenge from Obama like a scalded cat??? Jeez — grow up!

d   February 5th, 2008 5:17 pm ET

WHAT ARE YOU AFRAID OPRABAMA ?……………………………..

Clinton agrees to debate on Fox
After joining the Democratic National Committee and the party's other contenders in a boycott of debates sponsored by the Fox network, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's campaign said today that it has accepted an invitation to a Fox forum scheduled for next Monday, The Huffington Post's Sam Stein reports.

But her Democratic rival, Sen. Barack Obama, has not yet done so.

Mike   February 5th, 2008 5:17 pm ET

if you guys get off the bandwagon and see that Obama is nothing but a bunch of nice words, then you'll realize who the better leader will be. At every debate, Hillary has specific plans and goals and says how everything will be funded. From Obama, all you hear is "lets bring together the red and blue states, i dont know how, but let me woo you with this nice little speech that someone wrote for me". Its true…watch his commercials and turn on the tv right now. Excuse me one second as I go vote for Hillary…

Calindependent   February 5th, 2008 5:17 pm ET

Hillary is a better debater, no question,

Can't blame her for wanting a chance to show off her stuff.

Fact is, she's probably spent a million dollars and a thousand hours honing her debate skills.

She is unbelievably perfect in the debates, smiling a perfect smile and jotting down fake notes on her pad when Obama stoops so low as to actually say something that hurts her chances of getting elected.

I wish Obama would rise above all of it, even stop chastizing republicans, lobbyists, big pharma, that is the way to the healing this nation needs.

truth is, all people are good people, at least in part, yes, even our current president, and all three top contenders are lightyears more evolved than the one we have.

Adam, New York   February 5th, 2008 5:17 pm ET

Hillary Clinton 2008! For the win!

Crabby Alice in Florida   February 5th, 2008 5:17 pm ET

Stop with the "if you vote for Obama it will be worse than having Bush in the White House". I didn't vote for Bush in either of his terms, but I bet alot of you Obama haters did. You guy put bush in, so why in the hell should anyone listen to you.

Lydia   February 5th, 2008 5:16 pm ET

Great idea. The more we see them, the more we get to know them.

As for people who claim this is "calculating" and a "tactic," it's a plan, people. Someone who wants to be president should be planning all the time, not just reacting.

Ronnie Hooten   February 5th, 2008 5:16 pm ET

I can say as a military veteran, if Obama wins I will be voting for Sen. John Mccain in November. Experience does matter to more people. Hillary is my first choice to lead this nation, if not her then John Mccain.

Chris, Orlando, FL   February 5th, 2008 5:15 pm ET

B-b-b-because B-b-b-barack O-o-obama is a stuttering fool in debates. He's got a worse command of the English language than Bush. Doesn't really help him when his arguments lack substance, either. Hillary will cream him.

5Jayne   February 5th, 2008 5:15 pm ET

Sounds like Hillary is afraid of Obama's momentum and wants a positive headline for herself tomorrow. Maybe she thinks the real headline will read, "Clinton loses Big"! Besides, they have had 17 debates. Enough, already! Let's just vote and get the show on the road.

White   February 5th, 2008 5:15 pm ET

why is a debate a week necessary? just stupid

Danny in Pittsburgh   February 5th, 2008 5:14 pm ET

When will anyone take on the real issue in this campaign?

For the ever-growing Obama camp…the issues are as real as they are to any other candidate. But there's an injection of something NONE of us have seen in national politics in quite a long time, something that elevates this candidacy–and this candidate far above and beyond the status quo of "another Clinton" or a "retooled John McCain."

It's HOPE. With hope comes possibility. With possibility comes potential change.

Obama supporters are voting for the possibility that with enough UNITED voices behind him, we can move the entire nation forward with as many contributing opinions, ideas and proposals on the table…a TRUE America ruled by democrats, republicans, independents, Libertarians….

An America that maybe…just maybe…can first identify itself as AMERICAN first…and political party or philosophy second.

sad reality   February 5th, 2008 5:14 pm ET

There should be equal debates with other networks and not to have the bias and spin we are seeing by CNN. We may have a far shake on the issue, one problem Obama has to detail the issues and plans, Opps them means you have do more than make a speach that says nothing. the old white hairs of Ted will not behind your either. TRUE LEADERSHIP WITH FACTS IS SENATOR CLINTON

jess   February 5th, 2008 5:14 pm ET

It is so amazing how Clintonites fall for silly tactics. But if there are to be debates, let's talk about Iraq again and the mandates she wants on healthcare. She already admitted that she might use fines as an enforcement issue. BAH! Enough is enough. Let's vote for real substance and leadership.

Obama '08

jason   February 5th, 2008 5:14 pm ET

Hillary Hillary Hillary…. Sounds a bit desperate. The last thing she wants is Obama going around the country spreading Hope and Change in everyday peoples lives. She would rather be on the FOX network. (We need to look into this latest trick) Maybe Rupert is giving her more coins if she is on his channel? People let's get to researching. Isn't that where she made her MLK statement?… She needs to fall back and let the American people speak. Barack is such a gentleman and I hope he would never debate with the FOX channel. Who will moderate Bill O Reily. Yikes! Or the other psuedo journalist who spread all those nasty lies about him in the summer. I 'll take Wolf anyday. At least he had some balls to confront Hillary in the last debate about her vote for the war. Everyone seems to be scared of the Clintons. I wonder why?……

Mark Nickels   February 5th, 2008 5:14 pm ET

The Clinton camp is clearly worried about tonight….Must be that 13 point Zogby poll lead for Barack in California, more than enough for him to make up for pre-cast Clinton votes. (BTW, Zogby tends to poll below trends). The calendar of states coming up clearly favor Obama as well, whether or not he wins California tonight.

Hill Supporter from Minnesota   February 5th, 2008 5:14 pm ET

That's right it's a tactic because Obama can't take that much in-depth questioning.
If his camp thinks it's tough now, just imagine how the republicans will demolish him.

GO HILLARY!!!

polisticks   February 5th, 2008 5:12 pm ET

This is amazing how so many people now all of a sudden dislike Hillary (she had wide margin leads not long ago). You guys have listened for soo long to the right wing political smear engineers that now it's impossible for Hillary to get a fair shake. Don't you guys think that if Obama wins the republicans won't do the same thing to him…they will try to destroy him, they tried and failed to destroy the Clintons but they failed. Currently they still HATE Bill and Hillary. I have nothing against Obama, but the whole thing seems so contrived and the media (CNN) has joined in along with Fox and now the voting Democrates has joined in the act!! Please vote for the best person and not because it's the fashionable thing to do!

Christina   February 5th, 2008 5:12 pm ET

This a ploy. She has to be kidding?! Debates take time, prep, etc. no one has time for a debate a WEEK. This smacks of desperation. I wager anyone 5 bucks that when she comes out on top, she will drop this much like they did w/ claims of voter fraud in Nevada. Image a front runner asking for MORE debate time, how laughable. Just one more thing that makes me question her judgment……..I think he should call her on it. I would love for her to tell the poor how she will garnish their wages if they don't purchase insurance! Or how she will deport illegals on the first bus out of here! We don't need to hear more. I'm really disappointed that her campaign has become so silly as of late – and that's saying it mildly folks.

Lilly   February 5th, 2008 5:11 pm ET

People SHOULD know by now what the stances of their candidates are, but unfortunately, many do not. I think this would be an opportune time to give the American people specifics on a broader range of issues and even on issues that do not usually get enough media attention. Come on Obama!

Hillary Clinton '08

Anonymous   February 5th, 2008 5:11 pm ET

Hillary Clinton is so pathetic. And desperate. Enough to go on Fox. First she calls for Florida delegates to be counted, after she and others agreed to not campaign there. Now, when things are tied, she wants debates.

Why doesn't she just tear up before every primary. THAT has worked for her so well.

Desperate. Pathetic. L-O-S-E-R.

Bukky   February 5th, 2008 5:10 pm ET

**************************************************

THEY HAVE HAD 18 DEBATES, THATS 18. WHAT MORE NEEDS TO BE SAID THAT HAS NOT BEEN SAID.

HILLARY SUPPORTERS ARE RIGHT SHE ONLY WANTS TO DEBATE BECAUSE SHE KNOWS PEOPLE LIKE HER STYLE OF DEBATE BETTER.

SHE'S RUNNING OUT OF MONEY

NEEDS MORE TV TIME BETWEEN NOW AND MARCH 4

WANTS TO PULL OBAMA AWAY FROM THE ROAD BECAUSE SHE KNOWS THE MORE PEOPLE HE MEETS THE MORE GROUND SHE LOOSES. PEOPLE LOVE THIS GUY…

*************************************************

Roberto   February 5th, 2008 5:10 pm ET

Of course the Clintons want her in a controlled environment that she can be scripted for, and the networks toss her "puffballs" for questions. Obama simply kills her in environments where he speaks extemporaneously to people on the issues the people want to talk about.

akaDoug   February 5th, 2008 5:09 pm ET

What a great idea! That way Clinton can remember what it's like to talk in front of a large crowd! Plus if she starts working on it now she can cry during a debate…that's a sure fire winner!

Wake up people…the Clinton's are once again playing you!

Joe Sunrise Fl   February 5th, 2008 5:09 pm ET

This is bad move by Hillary. It shows that she is desperate. From the voice and drama coaching, Bill attacks and Now asking for debate.
Hillary doesn't have to do all of that !!! We already know what she has under her belt . There is nothing more to do than hope for people to continue voting for her. We all know her already her resume and intentions. It's just that Obama brings a new feeling that she will never be able to match. After all she is doing great, no need to show her worries.

I like Hillary's tenacity but Obama for ever

Carol   February 5th, 2008 5:08 pm ET

What does Hillary have to hide in any debate. Her life has been dragged through the mud since her husband was President. I want to see a little meat in this campaign.

Tom   February 5th, 2008 5:08 pm ET

With or without the debates Hillary outshines Obama in many fronts. But in the debates it is waaaaay more obvious!!!
Go Hill all the way to the White House!

o. v. wong   February 5th, 2008 5:08 pm ET

Or maybe he doesn't want to commit to more debates because he won't have to after today…have you or anyone else considered that alternative explanation? Some of you are so simple minded….I would suggest you all step back and look at the big picture for once.

If you're a Democrat voting today, consider who is the best candidate that represents the future of the party in the years to come. Who's best positioned at building a majority that will be able to deliver such important issues as immigration reform, social security reform and healthcare reform? You won't be able to do it if you win the White House by a 51% majority, otherwise we'll be talking about these same issues 4 or 8 years from now.

Good luck and God Bless America!

Obama '08!

Dennis   February 5th, 2008 5:08 pm ET

Wow, talk about jumping to conclusions. Just because Obama hasn't accepted a debate schedule doesn't mean he won't debate Clinton any more. If Obama had proposed a debate schedule, then he'd be getting derided as desperate by Clinton supporters, and Clinton would be getting bashed as being afraid. Really, none of this means anything yet. How many more debates and talent shows do we need anyway? Unless there are new topics to cover, what is the point of constantly rehashing the same thing? With the exception of the last debate, they usually just end up attacking each other.

Question   February 5th, 2008 5:08 pm ET

What could they possibly talk about each week? How many ways can Hillary say her vote on the Iraq war wasn't a mistake? She only wants more debates because Obama doesn't attack her. She can stick to her talking points (a la Bush) and brainwash the ill informed.

AJ   February 5th, 2008 5:08 pm ET

Trying to have frequent debates is a good strategy for Hillary. She does well one-on-one and far and away won the last debate before Super Tuesday. She has command of all of the issues, and manages to convey substance and incorporate details in her concise responses and rebuttals. Although Obama may be an inspirational speaker in his prepared speeches, I do not feel that he is nearly so adept at debating effectively and thinking on his feet. The more debates, the better for both candidates to better define their differences, goals and plans for the tuture of the country.

QuietStormX   February 5th, 2008 5:07 pm ET

Wow, what I've read from people supporting Hillary. They want the debate to highlight their candidate period. He knows that. It's not saying he is weak on this but, why would he help his opponent?

You people make me sick. Going back to the past, is not moving foward!

BOOMER FOR OBAMA   February 5th, 2008 5:07 pm ET

Could Clinton be running out of money to run an extended campaign??

-Hillary 08   February 5th, 2008 5:06 pm ET

===change Washington===will Obama change the constitution??

Jane   February 5th, 2008 5:06 pm ET

Obama says nothing in the debates anyway. Why can't people open their ears and eyes and see him for what he isn't. At least you can understand Hillary. I can see she isn't afraid . Go girl!!!!

Charlotte   February 5th, 2008 5:06 pm ET

Eileen, and they say Hillary supporters are uneducated white women? I understand Obamas' being against debates, he needs a pulpit ,with no questions please! He is the best at Rallys. I'm not impressed by endorsements nor pulpit politics. I am one of 5 million absentee voters in California, I voted for HILLARY and NO I haven't changed my mind .

Worc. MA   February 5th, 2008 5:05 pm ET

The debates actually give the candidates a chance to discuss policy. All the news outlets and commercials show is rhetoric, sound bites that really say absolutely nothing. I say good for Hillary Clinton for wanting more debates. It give the opportunity to have a campaign that talks about the issues. She has a clear plan for this country and the American people need the opportunity to be educated on this to make up their mind, and a good debate is the perfect way to do so.

TJ   February 5th, 2008 5:05 pm ET

This is the only way for her to get any air time on any of the networks. They are so pro Obama it's not even funny.

William A   February 5th, 2008 5:05 pm ET

Ahhhh It's Obama who didn't accept Hillary's Invitation.
So, it's Obama who must fear a debate with Hillary.
But I'm not surprised the HIllary hate mongers turned
it around again so it looks better for Obama.
And you say Hillary will do anything to win !
Obama needs more debates as so far no one is clear
on what his message is or where he stand on any given issue.

Darrell Edgley   February 5th, 2008 5:05 pm ET

I agree with many of the posts here, we do not need a debate a week. I think we know the major policy differences and this could get "stale" quick.

We need the Democrat candidates to get on with their campaigning, staying positive when they can and think of the real issue …. making sure the Republicans are "out of here" in Jan 2009 …. 350 days until Bush leaves.

Of the two, I favor Obama. Time for a change, "YES WE CAN".

If he does not get the nomination, then Hillary over McCain, who looks a shoe in for the Republican nomination despite West Virginia today (questionable tactics mind), but that’s “Republican Politics”.

LisaMpls   February 5th, 2008 5:05 pm ET

Dear ABC, do you care to comment on how Obama will enforce his mandate that all children have health insurance??? Do any other Obama supporters?

Sven   February 5th, 2008 5:04 pm ET

Why not have more debates?

There are so many questions that have not been asked or answered. What about:

1.Campaign finance reform
2.Afghanistan
3.Social Security
4.Details about each economic stimulus package
5.Experience in international relations
6.Why Obama and Clinton both voted to fund the war in Iraq, if they thought the war was wrong

These are issues that have not been discussed in depth, and there are many more. I want specifics!

Carol   February 5th, 2008 5:04 pm ET

The sad thing all of you Obama supporters can't see is he has turned into everything he said he was not about. How sad for him that he caved.

-Hillary 08   February 5th, 2008 5:04 pm ET

————————-

Wish things were easy

Inspired kids will be the fate, they have no idea they get inspired on many things

One more thing Bill did so many good things except media don’t acknowledge

!!!!!!!!! Hillary 08 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
……………

Jack from WV   February 5th, 2008 5:04 pm ET

HRC in her day was one of the best lawyers in the Nation you don’t get that way without having good debate skills and she has honed them for years being married to Bill has taught her some things as well. I just don’t want to hear her “voice or see those tears again. She is too calculated and well rehearsed too much for me.

Dave, Santa Barbara CA   February 5th, 2008 5:03 pm ET

Alex says frontrunners rarely demand debates. I sort of agree, except I can't remember a frontrunner EVER demanding a debate.

Hmmm….

Bennett   February 5th, 2008 5:03 pm ET

Might be a good idea if they actually said anything in the debates. If Hillary loses it is not be cause she is a woman, it is because more people thought there was a better candidate. Both are good and flawed candidates, but this does smack of desparation on the part of the Clinton campaign. At least wait until after today is over.

BeFair   February 5th, 2008 5:03 pm ET

This is a great idea..! Enough of 'We will Change, We will dream, We WIll Hope' kind of talks. Get him to the table and talk about issues. That's the best way to judge who is the bestcandidate to be the President. Not by hearing speeches containing the 'Change', 'Hopes' and 'Dreams' words. Only college students can get inspired by this kind of inspirational talks by a football coach. Because these kids still don't realize the problems faced by their parents.

Enough of this Footbal Coach – Get him to the table.

mike, wi   February 5th, 2008 5:03 pm ET

Come on! Obama people! what 's wrong with debate? I would rather see four debates to get to know more about the candidates than watching meaningless endorsements on TV… Plus, all the media now is favoring Obama, Hilary is namely "speechless" on Tv. I want to listen to candidate talking to make my descision. Not to biased reporters and ads…

TH   February 5th, 2008 5:02 pm ET

Sorry Eileen, I don't believe your story at all! I think your just looking to complaign. Oh, by the way, I'm not for Hillary at all!

Scott   February 5th, 2008 5:02 pm ET

Doesn't this cow get tired of chewing her cud? Does she know that she is not the be all and end all of the Democratic party just because her last name is Clinton. I wish the Dems didn't have this "love" affair with the Clinton's and would see them for who they are. Instead Dems compare and contrast the Clintons to the Bush's, wow reaching high there Dems. As an independent I can safely say that I will NEVER vote for a Clinton.

James   February 5th, 2008 5:02 pm ET

Obama doesn't want to accept because he knows that once people know his positions, they wont vote for him and see that he's full of it. Obama won't accept. Why? Because he can't handle himself during debates, just like he can't handle himself running the country.

o. v. wong   February 5th, 2008 5:01 pm ET

To AJ: Obama has spelled out all of his public policy views and positions in specific terms, you're just not looking or care to look for them. He did it in the last debate unless you didn't watch it. And if you still think he doesn't have any specific plans, you can always go to his website and look for them. Stop being a troll!

OJC, Phoenix, AZ   February 5th, 2008 5:01 pm ET

More debates? Do we really need to have 30 Debates?

HillBill is lame…

Go Obama!

Crabby Alice in Florida   February 5th, 2008 5:00 pm ET

Tell her no Obama. You have it and she knows it. She just wants you to slip up. The more a front runner is on TV, the better chance for one big mistake.Look how much Bill messed up by being in front of the camera so much. Maybe one more debate…….so she can lose her cool, because she will.

Alison, FL   February 5th, 2008 5:00 pm ET

Eileen, as long as you voted for the person you wanted to vote for that's all that matters!

Joseph   February 5th, 2008 5:00 pm ET

I think that the more people hear Obama speak the more attractive a candidate he becomes. I think that the Clinton camp might want to reconsider this position.

I won't be surprised to see Obama extend his lead in pledged delegates by tomorrow morning.

As for the superdelegates, they should not have any say in who the nominee is. The nominee should be decided by popular vote only.

Gus   February 5th, 2008 5:00 pm ET

Some Obama supporters are really ignorant….. Save me from these people pls…. GO HILLARY and her smart supporters! I'm proud to be one of them!!!!

Eric - Chicago, IL   February 5th, 2008 5:00 pm ET

I'm reminded of another Illinois politician with only 6 years exp in the illinois senate, and 2 years exp in the federal government.

He ran for president and won.

President Lincoln.

Could you imagine him being defeated by Douglas because he lacked "experience"?

Brando   February 5th, 2008 5:00 pm ET

Barack YOU NEED TO LEARN HOW TO DEBATE ie. no sttuters, or "uhs", uhms". That FIRSTdebate against McCain, that's THE ONE that's gonna count. He's gonna kill you.

george   February 5th, 2008 5:00 pm ET

Hillary, you're a great debater but why do we need to hear Obama say "I did not mean to say that" over and over again? He talks nice on tv and goes to dirty politics the next day. I for one don't want to hear him speak again but then, I would tune in to hear your ideas. Just the same, the less I hear and see of Obama the better! If you don't win Hillary… it's McCain for me.

LisaMpls   February 5th, 2008 5:00 pm ET

"In South Carolina debate Clinton said she is going to pull troops from Iraq in one year and in California debate she says she will not give us definite date for pullout?" – Seth

Seth, with all due respect, I think you are incorrect with this point. In the SC debate Hillary said she will likely be able to get most of the troops out in one year. She never agreed to the idea of getting them all out because she was always honest in stating that it is a complex situation. You can't just pick a random date and expect to stick to it as the safe choice.

Also as to your driver's license point. I believe Hillary always said that she would try and support her governor even though she did not like the idea of driver's licenses for a few reasons. One being that it distracted from larger immigration reform. The other being that it would require DMV workers to ignore the federal laws on the books regarding illegal immigrants.

I might be wrong, but that is what I remember.

Benjamin   February 5th, 2008 4:59 pm ET

I am amazed how people spin this against Clinton.

People ask if she has better things to do, than show the American people how her and her opponent compare to each other? Isn't that the point of all this?

Obama realizes that he looks much weaker without a crazy rally around him.

Anyone who thinks Obama did better in the last debate refused to listen to both sides. Typical that they drool over anything Obama says, but jumps at any point Hillary makes and begins to declare liar, or "oh please", or "whatever".

Jane   February 5th, 2008 4:59 pm ET

I think Hillary is the one to do the job. I saw her on David L. last night. She looked great and seemed ready to be the leader she is. If it takes more debates, I am sure she is ready for that too.

A. Harrison   February 5th, 2008 4:58 pm ET

Debates are needed to keep a focus on the Doer and the Talker.

HILLARY 2008!

Ray   February 5th, 2008 4:58 pm ET

awwww, Looks like Obama and his fans are nervous. He stinks at Debates and you all know that.

Lorraine   February 5th, 2008 4:58 pm ET

Ba-rock the vote babeeeeeeee! You got 'em running scared!!!!

Smile   February 5th, 2008 4:58 pm ET

I do not want to see anybody debate EVERY week. That is totally overkill….she needs to concentrate on her townhall meetings and other things….I would rather Obama come to my town or anywhere near so I can go to one of his rally's….Hillary is trippin.

James   February 5th, 2008 4:58 pm ET

Well this is a good idea because as someone said talk is cheap and thats all Obama has so debates would make him clarify this "change" he keeps talking about. I doubt if he wants to be specific so he will probably not debate her because he knows her plans are more detailed then his and frankly he will lose every debate to her.

Abe   February 5th, 2008 4:58 pm ET

Obama is great with speeches but is terrible at debates. Hillary just calling him out to explain what he means by "change"

Amy   February 5th, 2008 4:57 pm ET

Clinton wants Obama to waste time listening to her "same old – same old" self-serving soundbites instead of actively campaigning because she knows that the more voters see him in person, the more likely she is to lose. Those who are interested can find out the candidate's positions – and the differences – easily. Nothing new is said. The point is that she needs a controlled format where she can spew forth her memorized bits to look good. All candidates do that in debates. If they actually get into it – they're accused of "piling on" on "abandoning the politics of hope." What's the point? Let him campaign – why be obligated to waste time with her?

Sarah   February 5th, 2008 4:57 pm ET

What's next . . . Bill debating Michelle Obama? Chelsea debating Obama's kids? Michelle Obama is the most impressive of all four of them. She's amazing!

L, Williamsburg, VA   February 5th, 2008 4:56 pm ET

The Clinton camp wants weekly debates because they are losing their grip on the nomination. It is no longer a certain coronation. Underdogs always call for debates. Leaders have everything to lose.

Martha   February 5th, 2008 4:56 pm ET

I guess she knows that her campaign is running out of funds and she is looking for some free air-time … I hope this won't make her cry again ! After all this is 'hard work' too.

Martha

Brenda   February 5th, 2008 4:56 pm ET

Give me a BREAK!!!!!!!!!! How many times do we need to here DAY 1, and IF I KNEW THEN WHAT I KNOW NOW………
Give it up Hiliary!!

Dem08   February 5th, 2008 4:56 pm ET

Why are people making a fuss over this? Why are you calling Clinton desperate and calculating. This is what politics are about. Are you afraid to have Obama debate the real issues?

The post here only confirm whats been going on. People do not research their own canidates and even know why they are voting for them. How many anti-Hillary supporters took time to watch her town hall last night? Even if you do not vote for her, you deserve to know what she really stands for. I am convinced more than ever that some Obama supporters are only supporting him based on overblown speeches and because he is the "in" thing.

Sad what America is becoming.

Good Luck Hillary. If Obama is the canidate he says he is, then he will have no problem debating the issues.

ERICA   February 5th, 2008 4:56 pm ET

Hillary out shined Barack in all the debates and will continue to. Maybe the Obama camp is a little scared, they cant take out debate Clinton machine. Go Hillary!

Jason - Visalia, CA   February 5th, 2008 4:56 pm ET

Sounds like another nail in the Clinton campaign's coffin

Stacy Clarks, Texas   February 5th, 2008 4:56 pm ET

what for?!?!? they pretty much have the same ideas except for the one that really matters in this day and age – Iraq, and Obama clearly has that!! so why do i need to hear her ramble on and one about the same thing every week? Maybe 1 more debate, but once a week is plain stupid. She's desperate, and quite frankly, this turns me off from her! shame on you hillary!

OBAMA/EDWARDS 08!!!

Rosado   February 5th, 2008 4:56 pm ET

We will have the opportunity to deal with ideas and not empty words.

Lili   February 5th, 2008 4:56 pm ET

Senator Obama should accept,it should work to his advantage – right??

After all his supporters seem to think he has nothing to hide- right??
RIGHT?!?!?

Afraid he'll actually have to come up with answers that are not all full of hot air?

Mark   February 5th, 2008 4:55 pm ET

Ask ANY political pro: When a candidate starts asking for lots of debates, it's for two reasons. 1) The one asking for them is playing defense, seeing their advantage slip away, and 2) The one asking is hoping to rile up his or her supporters, goading them to claim falsely (as you see here in large numbers) that their uncooperative opponent "has something to hide or to fear." Utter nonsense. No political operative worth a dime would let his or her winning candidate accept such a pointless "sucker challenge" — EVER!

MD   February 5th, 2008 4:55 pm ET

Pretty obvious game plan.

A debate format works better for Hillary, as Obama is limited to 1 minute answers and 30 second rebuttals. As he is running on a vision, it's difficult to convey the vision in that short amount of time. Since Hillary runs on sound-bites without a vision, it works best for her.

Obama should wait and save his debating strength for the Republicans. Continue attracting the crowds to ever larger venues (our first arena president) and continue gaining momentum.

Hillary wants the debate format because she's betting that Americans won't feel comfortable seeing a woman "attacked" and, knowing this, Obama will be gentle (like he was in the last debate). If he "attacks" her, she can send out her attack dogs to play up the race card once again.

The Clinton's play a political game of personal destruction. Politics is personal to them. Obama had better not forget that.

Obama, tell her that you relish debates but will debate the Republicans. Until then, its time to continue to meet the voters up close and personal.

Anonymous   February 5th, 2008 4:55 pm ET

Debate? That last event was not a debate, it was a social chat.

Alan, Bonita Springs, FL   February 5th, 2008 4:55 pm ET

Please note I don't see anything in this report indicating Hillary's corner is DEMANDING debates. That's a far cry from CALLING for them.

Remember — Hillary is an attorney. She knows when you're coming out bargaining you always shoot high, figuring at least they'll get two a month in compromise.

I think debates are an excellent way to go, not desperation at all from either side. They'd BETTER be ready to debate, whoever wins, when they must go up against the Republicans.

Pat in MIchigan   February 5th, 2008 4:55 pm ET

unless there are additional issues to address I think we have covered their positions on the issues about 17 different times already

QuietStormX   February 5th, 2008 4:55 pm ET

Who are they requesting more debates? To help her go on and on talking and taking over the debate. You don't get enough questions answered because or her prolonged answers… One a week is four too much. You can follow any candidate online and newspapers plus c-span.

Jay   February 5th, 2008 4:55 pm ET

So let's see, Obama raises $32 million in a month, and Hillary raises a third of that. Sounds like someone is concerned about losing and looking for some free coverage.

Ryan   February 5th, 2008 4:54 pm ET

Is there real a need to have a weekly debate? Every other week should be fine or the candidates will run out of issues to debate, unless Mrs Clinton is planning to cry every time when she feels that she is losing ground.

Tina   February 5th, 2008 4:54 pm ET

How does asking to debate make it desperate? Pro Obama's are against it…I wonder why? It couldn't be because his true self comes out could it. The Pro Clinton's do not seem to have an issue with these two debating more often.

I say let them debate.

WallyWutMD   February 5th, 2008 4:54 pm ET

I support Obama, but honestly, I think Hillary is a better debater than he is. That doesn't mean that her policies are better than his (because they're not). It just means that she's a more seasoned politician. No one can beat her in a live debate, and she knows it, and is trying to use it to her advantage. Fortunately, it seems that most Americans don't really want another seasoned politician in the White House, and Obama is a welcoming change to the filthy world of politics. Obama should accept her challenge. He might not be able to tap dance around the issues as well as Hillary, but people will be drawn to his honesty, and composure in the face of the Clinton machine.

Hillary08   February 5th, 2008 4:54 pm ET

Obama is the media darling… and the debate flunkee. He's probably going to be very busy picking up Teddy's dry cleaning.

DE, NV   February 5th, 2008 4:54 pm ET

One thing I like this stuff……it is FREE speach …free opnion….after all it is free country. You can comment what ever you want…. .The fact you will see tomorrow and at the dem. convention. …..you will see who the majority of American voted for… I have voted for Hillary at the caucus in Nevada. Even though Culinary union workers endorsed Obama… but it was meaning less.

Susan   February 5th, 2008 4:54 pm ET

One cry per week, one outburst by Bill per week, one apology from Bill per week . . . why not one debate per week?

matthew   February 5th, 2008 4:53 pm ET

excellent idea! let them tell us about their differences themselves and talk about it openly.

GO HILLARY!

chris   February 5th, 2008 4:53 pm ET

Unlike well-scripted and even more well-rehearsed speeches full of lofty rhetoric delivered to friendly audiences, the one-on-one debate forum requires in depth knowledge of the issues and that the participants be required to answer sometimes tough questions. Obama does not do too well under this kind of scrutiny, so it is understandable that his handlers are hesitant to commit. Hillary, on the other hand, IS prepared, IS extremely knowledgeable, and IS ready to step up to the plate. Is he perhaps a little afraid of debating her?

Stirring talk doesn't mean a thing without the depth of experience to back it up.

Hillary "08.

frggerou812   February 5th, 2008 4:53 pm ET

i am div. between the to cand.the swing is to hillary because off of more international time with other countries.

Ravi Bosco   February 5th, 2008 4:52 pm ET

Spin…spin all the way from the Clinton machine… with money and fame running out for them, its a clever trap laid out for Obama, to prevent him from getting 'connected' directly to people – which is a real threat to Clinton's 'right' to reign…Hope Obama rejects this outright because it's ill conceived!

Laurie   February 5th, 2008 4:52 pm ET

This is not about despareration. This is about getting the best president and to be honest Obama is weak in the debate forum, he does not stand up for himself or his record very much because his record is a weak one. He has never had to make a tough decision and his record shows this, I wonder why the media has not jumped on that band wagon? Voting present over 150 times???? He hasn't even voted most that 5 or 6 times since September of 07. Give me a break, you want to talk a windbag, that is Obama in a nutshell. I have hope what I need is a strong leader with strong record and he doesn't have a strong enough record on any issue to make me feel comfortable.

Deirdre   February 5th, 2008 4:52 pm ET

If Senator Obama decides not to debate her, will Hillary cry again!

Can I EVER get posted?!   February 5th, 2008 4:52 pm ET

No one is RIGHT all of the time. It is arrogant to say so. We make tough decisions and learn from mistakes and then gain EXPERIENCE. Obama needs to do more debates and town hall meetings and show us that he can answer the tough questions. No more pulpit rallys!!!

Vote for REAL CHANGE, Health care for ALL- HILLARY 2008

CDR   February 5th, 2008 4:52 pm ET

The momentum of the movement that is "The Future of America," can only be prolonged by today's events but America is long past overdue for CHANGE.

When the people lead, our leaders will follow! The people are moving and the loosely knitted fabric that is America is becoming quilted ever more tightly into a coalition of everyday people who demand a new direction and more from our leaders. There are those that would leave the fabric divided. There are those that would leave holes in America and allow our Nation to continue to come apart at its stitches. However, the people have chosen to unite for one UNITED STATES and one AMERICA.

We look forward to a future of a a stronger AMERICA where the least of us has opportunity to prosper. Where we re-invest in the foundation of this Nation… that is the American people because without the American people there is no America. This is a Nation governed by the people and for the people and for so long we have not had our voices heard but TODAY WE VOTE for CHANGE. And, the people will prevail over the establishment that has oppressed the everyday American, that has left our children in debt, shipped our jobs oversees, and made it ever so hard to succeed in the Land of Opportunity. Today we are not without HOPE we are not without a VOICE.

PLEASE Get out and BARACK the VOTE for OBAMA and for a Nation United.

-CDR

b.   February 5th, 2008 4:52 pm ET

Barack does not need to spend his time in debates. No more debating. He needs to be out speaking to people.

ANYONE but Hillary   February 5th, 2008 4:52 pm ET

Hillary's plan for the mortgage markets will be a disaster.

Home prices are going to suffer when she freezes mtge rates and stops foreclosures completely.

But that doesn't matter cause she has

GIRL POWER!

Bill Mott   February 5th, 2008 4:51 pm ET

Talk is cheap and Obama has done a lot of talking , but very little action, at least Hillary has been making changes right along, she can back up her 'talk'.
And when Hillary finally wins this election she will have defeated all three parties, The Republicans, The Democrats(old guard w/Obama), and the news media. He has every news commentator singing his praises and knocking "The Clintons", at Hillary Clintons expense.. Go Get Em, Hillary.. You are the best , most prepared and most inteligent candidate out there on either side and in the news media, too.

Gil - California   February 5th, 2008 4:51 pm ET

Just more tv to avoid, that woman's voice grates worse the Babs and Rosie combined.

Tony G   February 5th, 2008 4:51 pm ET

I think the American people that will vote need to see both Obama and Hillary debate the issues. The voters then will see that "EXPERIENCE" is most important and not the charm of Obama!!!

John   February 5th, 2008 4:51 pm ET

Hey Obama if you can't denate with Hillary..How you are going to negotiate with world leaders…

If obama is the president the america will not be #1 country in the world.

EU,China,Russia,India and Brazil will definitely beat in economy.

Already the dollar value is dead under ocean.

b.lee   February 5th, 2008 4:50 pm ET

One debate a week is a desperate call for help from Mrs. Clinton, she couldn't even wait until all the numbers are in from Super Tuesday.

Sylvia   February 5th, 2008 4:50 pm ET

coward OBAMA….thought he was sooooo good at talking
he is SNAKE OIL
stop drinking the KOOL AID people
talk is CHEAP and so is he
if he wins, our country deserves him
8 years ago we were taken in by a smooth talker by the REPUBLICANS and now the DEMOCRATES fall for the same old sh–

linda, OKC OK   February 5th, 2008 4:50 pm ET

DESPERADO!!!! Maybe she'll shed a tear or two on national television.

08bama!!!!!!!

Jazz   February 5th, 2008 4:50 pm ET

No crying. Just the symptoms of the common cold. Everybody gets one sooner

or later. Don't Hate…… APPRECIATE! The one thought that will unite the demo-

cratic conservatives and republican party more than the thought of president

Hillary Rodham Clinton is the thought of president Barack Hussein Obama.

To change Washington, will Obama change the constitution or boot the demo-

cratic majority in congress? Thanks but no thanks. Vote Hillary? YES I DID!

YOU CAN TOO!

Jim   February 5th, 2008 4:50 pm ET

LOL…………..Clinton is about out of money and Obama is raking in money every day like there is no tomorrow.

Of course Clinton wants all the debates she can get ( FREE AIR TIME )

This woman is such a joke.

the one   February 5th, 2008 4:49 pm ET

Hey McCaskill. you better check how many times Hillary voted present before writing anything, while you're at it go type Hillary Clinton + Peter Paul in youtube….

Independant

kigozi   February 5th, 2008 4:49 pm ET

WOLF, AS A VETERAN ANCHOR, YOU NEED TO BE FAIR, THE CNN POLITICAL ANALYST CALLED GLORIA BORGER IS AN OBAMA SPIN ANCHOR WHO SPINS EVERYTHING IN THE OBAMA FAVOR, SO DOES THAT LOUD ROLAND MARTIN

Al in Wpg   February 5th, 2008 4:49 pm ET

Sounds like Hillary is getting ready for an upset tonight.

Republicrat   February 5th, 2008 4:49 pm ET

Not necessary. People should know by now what the candidates platforms are. A weekly debate would just be overkill.

Joe   February 5th, 2008 4:49 pm ET

It's sad to see so much hate for Hillary. Such irrational hate, for no good reason.

People should LOVE this idea of having more debates, not hate the idea. Just more irrational, blame Hillary, hate junk.

LisaMpls   February 5th, 2008 4:49 pm ET

I think there is way more ground to be covered…we don't need them to hash out the same few topics every time. So, I agree that the moderators would have to ask new questions. There were some great new ones asked during Hillary's national town hall last night and even by Letterman. I agree, make sure to ask both candidates the same questions. They could have debates focused on just a few important issues that have been pretty much overlooked.

Go hilary   February 5th, 2008 4:49 pm ET

Yes we want more debates. Hillary 08!

obama are you scared of a women?

Boogie   February 5th, 2008 4:49 pm ET

the reason Obama loses in debates is because he can't preach his sermon and NOT be asked tough questions.
When you start forcing Obama to give explanations to HOW he's going to CHANGE everything…he makes a silly twit of himself and starts pointing fingers.

Clinton wants to take away the fluff factor from Obama and show Americans that when you strip away the big patriotic stump…he really falls short on the real issues.

Nick   February 5th, 2008 4:49 pm ET

If there were a way to be easily sarcastic in a post so we could make fun of all the people who make un-inteligent comments, than this would be so much more fun.

KB   February 5th, 2008 4:49 pm ET

CNN should get it straight. Her campaign ACCEPTED the invitation from FOX to participate in the debate. No word on whether the Obama campaign has accepted.

So who is it thats afraid?

J   February 5th, 2008 4:49 pm ET

I think it's a GREAT idea. Then perhaps I can actually hear Obama SAY something of substance. Seems like a great guy, but he doesn't really lay out his plan for this "change."

John Hardina   February 5th, 2008 4:49 pm ET

She's PATHETIC!!! How can ANYBODY trust her?

Funny...   February 5th, 2008 4:48 pm ET

This is pretty funny.. First the Michigan, Florida delegate drama, now the 2nd round of crying before a big primary.. No this?? This is better than One Life to Live.. Seriously..

Barb   February 5th, 2008 4:48 pm ET

Go for it!!!

She or Bill continue to challenge but this one is for you. Push and make her tell how her health care plan is going to make the low income people suffer (forced to pay for insurance and forget the food for your table and the rent, etc).

Push and make her name the foreign country's which are financially supporting she and Bill.

Push to find out why the White House papers have not been released.

Push to find out where Susan McDougal is. Why is she not out supporting the Clintons–she went to jail rather than testify against Bill.

Kobe, LA   February 5th, 2008 4:48 pm ET

In the last debate Mrs. Clinton was trounced on the issue of Iraq. I don't think she wants to engage in that discussion again. On healthcare, I think people are beginning to focus on the issue of just how she plans to enforce her mandate — going after people's wages is not something she seems eager to discuss in public. Finally, on her economic plan, freezing interest rates for 5 years on subprimes is yet another risky proposition. She may get more than she bargained for from debates going forward. Be careful what you ask for.

d.a.   February 5th, 2008 4:48 pm ET

THE ONLY TIME B.O. IS CALLED ON HIS ISSUES AND LIES, IS DURING DEBATES. WE NEED THE DEBATES.. YOU CAN REALLY SEE THE TRUE PERSON BY GETTING CAUGHT OFF GUARD…HILLARY IS THE ONLY CHOICE, B.O. COULDN'T EVEN COMPARE TO WHAT SHE HAS TO OFFER. UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE, IS JUST ONE ISSUE. JUST BY HIM SAYING UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE , HE IS ALREADY NOT FOLLOWING THROUGH ON HIM CAMPAIGN PROMISES. NO B.O.!!!!

Undecided   February 5th, 2008 4:48 pm ET

There's nothing wrong with a healthy debate. It's good for the democratics because I've seen the Clintons taken a beating in the press and a lot of hype about Obama. So I don't who is better and if its media spin or not. At the end of this, I think it's good. Because then we will really see who is ready to lead on day one. Honestly I still like both candidates and I am undecided voter in a later caucus.

Carrie   February 5th, 2008 4:47 pm ET

The exit polls today must be good for Obama. The Clinton Machine smells defeat. Why would they suggest more debates on this glorious day?

Obama 08! YES WE CAN!!!

Emily Coletta   February 5th, 2008 4:47 pm ET

I don't think he should do it.

Obama's a superior orator, but the thing about speeches is that you have time to reflect and examine what you're going to say.

Hillary, on the other hand, is uninspiring but where she really shines is at the debates where she can give lackluster, but quick responses. Obama looks clumsy in comparison.

So, Obama, just don't agree to attend the debates. Do what you do best. Leave Hillary to sit by herself.

Roger   February 5th, 2008 4:47 pm ET

I do not understand. Even Barack Obama himself said the people don't know him. Well here is a way to get to know him. What I have found is that the only effective way Obama can talk is in front of crowds where all he has to do is say yes we can. When it actually gets down to having to talk about the issues one on one he is unable to get a clear message across. I wouldn't accept either if I knew I was up against Hillary. She would win over so many voters by her demonstration of her knowledge of the issues and her plans and visions for America.
Hillary 2008

Swerdloc   February 5th, 2008 4:47 pm ET

Just like American Idol. Or Survivor. Or Dancing With the Stars. Or…

Laurie   February 5th, 2008 4:46 pm ET

I love watching the debates between the two. I hope that the Obama camp will accept. The debate really show each candates weaknesses and stregnths.

L. West   February 5th, 2008 4:46 pm ET

The photo selected depicts Senator Obama, though he is gesturing, as if he were sleeping. Surely, of all the photographs taken during that friendly debate you could find one which depicts both at their best. The unflattering shot while his eyes were closing sends a message. Seems a bit misleading and puts him in a negative light. Was that intentional?

StopwatchingMSNBC, Rochester, NY   February 5th, 2008 4:46 pm ET

Sorry Hillary, you two had your chance for eight years, and you couldn't give us health care. -Melissa in CA

No, she just gave us the childrens healthcare plan.

If we do not know their position by now. We never will. -Ron

Some people don't watch MSNBC or CNN to get that anti Hillary message, so they want to know what the hype is about. Maybe they are still undecided and want to hear more about foreign policy which they haven't reall touched on in any debate.

The only reason why you don't want the debate is because Hillary wins every debate on issues of substance except the Iraq vote.

JR, Missouri   February 5th, 2008 4:46 pm ET

How convenient. I suppose that if Clinton still had her huge leads in national/state polls, she wouldn't want any extra debates at all.

Funny how she always wants to change the rules of the game to try and maximize her benefit (e.g.-Nevada balloting, Michigan/Florida primaries), especially when the tide is turned against her.

Note to the Clinton camp: Piling up sand bags won't help you in the face of a tsunami of change to a new generation of politics in America.

Sue   February 5th, 2008 4:45 pm ET

What are you Obama people afraid of? So far the media people have propped him up and he has done a rock star tour without answering any tough questions. We are electing a President. Don't you want to know what he really stands for and what he would do about all the serious problems that America faces? So far he hasn't shown me anything except nice speeches and empty promises.

GO HILLARY 2008

Jimmy VALENTE   February 5th, 2008 4:45 pm ET

Just desparate..

"Hillary will" is desapearing because of her ego, and paranoÏa..

America does notneed another paranoïa for 4 years again..

Obama is the man America was waitng since a long long time.
Hillary never brougty successfully her healthcare wher her husband was 8 years in the white house.

Get out of Here The Clintons!.

You will be beaten again by this folk who is really really smart President!.

Jimmy VALENTE

Ph.d

sandra longley   February 5th, 2008 4:45 pm ET

Obama is making so many misstatements he's tying factchecker up running them all down..Someone has got to call him on this stuff and its not going to be the media, altho, CNN did run a story on the ticker on superbowl sunday about the nucleor reactor leak and obamas caving into republican pressure, and a 200,000 contribution to his campaign by the Excelon corp, bet you did'nt read that…more ammo for debates…..we can…hillary

Terry, Texas   February 5th, 2008 4:44 pm ET

Hillary wants to prove to all the Obama people that he is a student still learning and she is much more experienced. Obama can fool the gullible people but will never fool the smart voters. Hillary loves to debate against Obama for one main reason. She is smarter and more experienced and she will be our next president.
Obama is a good speaker thats it and fools alot of people with his words.
Actions are the real words. PRESENT, PRESENT, PRESENT.
WOW I CAN'T BELIEVE ANYONE WOULD VOTE FOR OBAMA.

MJ   February 5th, 2008 4:44 pm ET

There may be a darn good reason why the Obama campaign has declined the offer.

Go to Youtube and search "Fox Attacks Obama". Fox News misrepresented Obama badly throughout the campaign unfairly and some could even call slander.

Eileen Polanco   February 5th, 2008 4:44 pm ET

Hi! When i went to vote this morning i did not like the way the candidates names were set up.
Hilary's name was in the first colum and Obamas name was the last one. It was difficult for me to find his name. i have asked a laddy to help me and she told me, OH!?Hilarys name is here, the first one. But i am here for Obama i told her.She got mad at me i don't know why.Eileen

sara   February 5th, 2008 4:44 pm ET

Thank god, Hillary is the most common sense of the two and will smoke Bama like at the Kodak.

Pete   February 5th, 2008 4:44 pm ET

I am not surprised Hillary has asked for this. Not unusual when people do drastic things when they realize that there back is against the wall.

GO OBAMA!!!!!!!!!!

Tom, Rockport ME   February 5th, 2008 4:44 pm ET

I'm a Hillary supporter– but the reason for this is clear. Obama is winning the money race. If the race goes on and on, Hillary will run out of money long before he does, and won't be able to campaign with the same intensity. A debate every week keeps her in the mainstream media for free.

Too bad it comes to this– I hope that the voters will, sooner than later, start to choose substance over style.

Bob   February 5th, 2008 4:44 pm ET

If Obama won't do it, can they try to get Ron Paul? He's always making crazy suggestions, like shutting down our imperial bases and following the Constitution, but nobody ever actually explains why those things are such bad ideas.

James   February 5th, 2008 4:44 pm ET

The last debate was actually really useful in finally seeing differences between the two candidates policies and thinking patterns and actually had discussion of substance. Although it was dubbed a "Love Fest", because apparently it should be a Hockey fight, but most voters and esp. Democrats found they got to know their candidates better.

As long as they can keep it civil…it is a great idea…esp. if they have the type of free-flow discussion they had last time with Wolf (I was pretty happy with his moderation). Really no more of this 30-60-90 sec answers and let them convince Amercians who is the best candidate.

At worst the Democrats get a lot of free press, they both get practice in Debating the issues and the public gets to know both of them better and their positions to make an informed vote during the primaries and in November and it will fire up the Democrats too.

I heard from some Republican friends that watched the last one after the Republican debate that both Democrats seemed more Presidential than any of the Republicans and surprised themselves to consider voting for Obama and Clinton in November. (they were really shocked to admit that)

Ado   February 5th, 2008 4:43 pm ET

She wants to take up Obama's time so he can't be out meeting people on the campaign trail. In a debate he is at the mercy of her distortions and her underhanded digs.

These debates have been nothing more than candidates trading cheap shots.

Obama, get out there and meet the people. When they meet you in person and see what you are about, they will know who should be our next president.

Obama 08!!!

Murray   February 5th, 2008 4:43 pm ET

She wants to debate because she obviously has confidence in the superiority of her policies, arguments and experience. Obama is a tremendous speaker and the fact Clinton has no fear in taking him on is testimony to her confidence and belief in her policies. Sure Obama is a charismatic figure and very likeable, but his policies and arguments are somewhat questionable at times. On the other hand, Clinton's more extensive experience and more tightly woven policies indicate she is more suitable for this JOB.

ANYONE but Hillary   February 5th, 2008 4:43 pm ET

YAY! U GO GRL! LOL! GRL PWR! GO SOCIALIZED HEALTHCARE!

Let's freeze mortgage rates! YAY!

Let's ban foreclosures! YAY!

That'll fix the economy!

idiots.

Debate Tactics   February 5th, 2008 4:43 pm ET

The plan is for Hillary to begin breaking down during the debates now and hope her blubbering will attract a few more sheep.

Kat   February 5th, 2008 4:43 pm ET

Someone's freaking out! It's actually a good strategy, try and keep him off the campaign trail while he's preparing for the debates. Hopefully the Obama campaign won't bite. Accept one debate, nothing substantial will be gained by four.

Linzy   February 5th, 2008 4:43 pm ET

Clinton folks

please give it up. If you're trying to convince us that you're the best candidate you should have done that while in the White House the last time. You're an excellent speaker – granted. However you as a candidate don't inspire me at all. If anything all the issues in SC have really pushed me to vote for Obama or John McCain.

Had Obama not run I truly would have voted for you.

I've listened to you and Universal Health Care doesn't work without the funds to pay for it. The last time I checked most of our jobs were headed overseas, primarily to India. If we move toward a Universal Health Care system paid for by American tax payers we will be more broke than we already are. I've already been part of a Universal Health Plan and the idea of missing at least one third of my check does not appeal to me.

Last but not least, it's highly unlikely that you'll be able to run the WH with Bill constantly in tow. He's been too much of a distraction over the last several weeks. A lot of us believe that it won't be any different this time. Co-President then, Co-President now. I like you but no thanks.

Paul   February 5th, 2008 4:43 pm ET

Excellent idea! Especially if the debate is structured closely along the guidelines established & followed during the Democratic Los Angeles affair. A frank discussion of positions, policies and concrete proposals about resloving our common problems ~~ especially those inherited from the Bush administration. That means, no demogoraphy, demonlogy, ribald teary flag waving patriotism, references to religion (espeically born-again Christianity) etc.

Sig, Los Angeles CA   February 5th, 2008 4:42 pm ET

One debate a week? Fine! The more people get to know Obama, the more he moves up in the polls.

Laura   February 5th, 2008 4:42 pm ET

Good idea since most Obama supporters are simply caught up in Obama's empty but lofty rhetoric.
Anyone with political chops cam expose Obama's lack of debate skills and lack of substance on the issues due to his inexperience and cowardly approach where he never actually takes an official stand (ie, he doesn't vote yes or no in order to keep his proverbial nose clean).
THese debates expose him while they shed light on the Clinton resume.

He's a great sound-bite artist, but when Clinton speaks you get the policy answers and a sense of her readiness as well as insight into her understanding of the inner-workings of the highest office.
When Obama debates, he stutters and repeats himself. Hillary has always been the better debater.
How else can her campaign compete with his rockstar armor?

AKB   February 5th, 2008 4:42 pm ET

He is terrified that he'll have to answer a question and offer details. He is a sham propped up by the media drooling over him.

Fred   February 5th, 2008 4:42 pm ET

HILLARY can face any challenge thrown on her. She is ready anytime and she will be ready to take the WHITE HOUSE anytime. One tough woman. I really admire her. Obama stutters on debates and his thoughts are disorganized. Mc Cain is too slow on debates so HILLARY stands out. Bet you, she can go on debate tomorrow if required. That is HILLARY!

Ray, Venice, CA   February 5th, 2008 4:42 pm ET

What you have here is a situation where on candidate is a better speaker (Obama) and the other performs better in debates (Clinton). If Obama refuses to comply with the Clinton camps request, they will be able to spin it like Obama is scared to face Hillary….or some other non-sense like that. This is viewed as a no lose situation for the Clinton camp and I hope Obama is able to expose what they are doing before the spinning begins.

Obama should agree to 1/2 the number of debates that Clinton wants but only under "certain" circumstances. Then his camp could set unreasonable circumstances and when Hillary refuses to accept the conditions, the Obama camp can turn the table on her. This will show he is able to compromise and she is the one who is scared to face him…or some other non-sense.

Since when did Hillary become so desperate??? Will she cry if he doesn't agree to debate her???

Greg, Phoenix, AZ   February 5th, 2008 4:42 pm ET

Yeah, because that's exactly what we need.

They are so desparate.

Stepfon Lewis   February 5th, 2008 4:42 pm ET

if he turns her down… he'll look like he's scared. in all actuality i don't think its a good decision for her camp. do they think she's blowing him away or something?.. she lost about 10 points after the last one.

James Nelson   February 5th, 2008 4:41 pm ET

Great, more forums where she can say more stuff she obviously doesn't mean about things she has no intention of doing.

Tell us more about your incredible experience. That's always riveting.

Better yet, tell us why the insurance and pharmaceutical lobbies are funneling vast sums your way and how that will actually help with your wonderful universal healthcare plans.

Or why defense industry lobbyists are doing the same and how you really, really want to get the troops home right after you get elected. Well, almost right after. Maybe. Never mind the actual vote for the war or the pro-war cheerleading you were doing right up until 2005…

Oh, never mind. Just go on making crap up and hoping we'll believe you. If it worked for George W. it ought to work for you.

Julie   February 5th, 2008 4:41 pm ET

Obama does well when he has a prepared speech about abstract issues (change, hope, etc.) but when he has to talk about his policies, he fumbles. These debates demonstrate that behind all the rhetoric, he's actually someone we don't want in office, we want someone with solid, well thought out ideas.

Jon, Pittsburgh, PA   February 5th, 2008 4:41 pm ET

Listening to the candidates debate the issues is a bad thing?
Hillary is desperate? LMAO.

I'd prefer to listen to debates about the issues and proposed solutions to our nation's pressing problems than to listen to both of these candidates give campaign speeches.

Maybe people could then choose substance over rhetoric.

Bukky   February 5th, 2008 4:41 pm ET

Oh come on… We already know the differences. That last debate was pretty clear. There have been 18 debates. what more do you need to say that you have not said in the past 18 debates.

She's hoping that she can get Obama to slip up or get angry with her for something. She wants FREE TV time because she can't afford the TV time that Obama can This is just a ploy for her to stay on TV without spending money she doesnt have.

I say Obama should put off any further debate until After March 4… That way she actually HAS to raise money…

Mark   February 5th, 2008 4:41 pm ET

This is a familiar political tactic, typically adopted by the candidate who fears he or she now has something to lose, and wants to pull his or her surging opponent as often as possible into a forum where, the one suggesting frequent debates hopes, the challenger will "slip up" and create an opening. My bet? The Obama camp laughs it off. The Clinton camp must proceed cautiously here; accurately or not, pushing this suggestion too hard or for too long will make them look "desperate."

HJ, Richmond   February 5th, 2008 4:40 pm ET

Both candidates are just going to stick to their individual talking points and hope they can trip the other one up. Its time to vote

PW Va   February 5th, 2008 4:40 pm ET

Shrill voice versus misty eyes….hmmmmmmm…I'll take the misty eyes, please!

StopwatchingMSNBC, Rochester, NY   February 5th, 2008 4:40 pm ET

Only Obama supporters would look at this as something bad for our democracy. Come on. Why wouldn't you want people to be informed on the candidates positions before voting? Maybe it's because she has substance to her candidacy and she doesn't just tell people what they want to hear.

Illinois Democrat   February 5th, 2008 4:40 pm ET

Very interesting! Which aspect is more revealing? Mrs. Clinton's sudden interest in weekly debates, or Mr. Obama's wait-and-see reply? Think of it this way, if the Clinton team was confident about the results from Super Tuesday, would they really be looking for weekly opportunities to give Mr. Obama MORE coverage on TV? Or is the Clinton camp truly worried about the advent of an Obama victory on Super Tuesday, followed in quick succession by a series of additional Obama victories in Washington, Louisiana, Maryland, Virginia and Wisconsin?

Paula in Virginia   February 5th, 2008 4:40 pm ET

She never answers any questions in the debates!

Damian   February 5th, 2008 4:40 pm ET

If talk is cheap, then Obama must be 'free', cause all he does is talk.
The Dems and America will be counting the cost though, if he wins the nomination!

John from VA   February 5th, 2008 4:39 pm ET

Great Idea!!! Anyone can make great speeches….but can you stand up and defend what you say???!!! (Obama)….

terry in colorado   February 5th, 2008 4:39 pm ET

just go away already. Your voice is annoying all of us.

corey   February 5th, 2008 4:38 pm ET

Hillary Clinton is such a joke … comparing herself to the NY Giants… haha… She is such a desperate clown…

Hillary Clinton has alot of crying in her future… Barack the Vote baby!!!

Christian, Tampa FL   February 5th, 2008 4:38 pm ET

I wonder what this is about, because Obama did his best in the one on one debate and I think that multiple debates would largely help him.

Maybe Hillary wants to bore everyone to death and take all the excitement out the campaigns, thus falling back upon her default advantage.

RFB   February 5th, 2008 4:38 pm ET

She beats him hands down at every debate. No wonder OBAM hasitates to make a decision about one on one debates. She is prepared with answers, no stuttering around trying to come up with something that sounds good and makes sense.

Brian   February 5th, 2008 4:38 pm ET

Sure, let's bring on some more debates! It will be good practice for Barack in the general election match up!

Obama '08!!!

Jo   February 5th, 2008 4:38 pm ET

gives Obama a chance to Flip on the war AGAIN!!

David Margolis   February 5th, 2008 4:38 pm ET

Needless to say, no candidate will ask the other candidate to stipulate to anything unless the proposing candidate believes she will benefit. One could argue that Hillary believes she is the superior debater and that Obama loses ground after debates. However, the results from the debates have been very mixed and Obama's momentum has increased despite of (or even perhaps because of) the debates.

I believe Hillary's plan here is to take Barack out of the realm where he's most comfortable: meeting with voters one on one and interacting with the people directly. Barack is also more comfortable when he has time to prepare speeches in advance, whereas debates require at least some degree of improvisation. If I was advising the Obama campaign, I would say "beware of Greeks bearing gifts" — Clinton's advisors obviously believe it's to her advtange to do this, so he should consider it carefully before agreeing.

Joe   February 5th, 2008 4:38 pm ET

I LOVE this idea! The more debates the better! I can't believe people would have something against this, you are quite pathetic if you're against MORE debates between two AWESOME candidates.

Kevin   February 5th, 2008 4:38 pm ET

Each debate ought to focus on one main issue too.

1-Health Care
2-Balancing the Budget
3-International Affairs
4-Education and NCLB

Clinton wants more debates to help voters to make informed decisions…

Go Clinton 2008!!!!

Ricki   February 5th, 2008 4:38 pm ET

Go Hillary! You shine in debates!

Cheryl   February 5th, 2008 4:38 pm ET

I don't think I can take that. She is much to shrill and harsh on the ears.

Corey   February 5th, 2008 4:38 pm ET

The misogynism that is surfacing during this campaign is nauseating. When asked why particular people don't back Clinton their answers are vague and without substance. It comes down to "Well, I just don't like her."

Marie   February 5th, 2008 4:37 pm ET

I wish EVERYONE would stop campaigning the day of. I am sure Obama will participate in numerous debates; he couldn't expect to be electable otherwise. So, for one day I wish: Media quit with the bogus tickers, Hillary quit it, Obama quit it, and folks, follow your own judgments. If someone can change your mind one way in 10 seconds, and then the wind blow and you are just as moved, there's a problem, I think. I am not saying be inflexible. I am saying that if you know why you're doing what you're doing in the first place, you shouldn't be THAT easily swayed.

Janet Bell   February 5th, 2008 4:37 pm ET

Of course Hillary wants a debate a week, that's where she has a slight edge. How about a weekly speech in a huge auditorium and broadcast on all the networks. Would she want that? I don't think so.

open your eyes - FL   February 5th, 2008 4:37 pm ET

Just how deep is the Clintons' strategy bag… Good Lord.

Considering that Hillary has such a problem answering several things such as her vote for war and how she'll penalize people in her health care plan I'm not so sure this is the greatest idea for her. It might encourage Barack to pull even more Clinton nasties out of the bag. Although it also might actually be entertaining watching her dodge and swerve the questions… kind of like the kids on MTV asking her to explain her electability problem and her awful record of pork barrel spending in NY. She didn't directly answer a single one of the questions. Bet she wasn't expecting that from a bunch of stupid, uninformed, American Idol teeny-boppers. Her mood went from boisterous to sullied in an instant. She probably thought she'd get on there and steal some of Barack's support… man did that backfire.

z,new york, ny   February 5th, 2008 4:37 pm ET

why? so she can:

1. muddle her answers to iraq war vote questions?
2.avoid explaining what her penalty for not taking her mandated health plan is?
3.try to advertise her rallies or national town halls during the last 10 seconds of the debate?
4. triangulate more while Obama clearly lists (and even ticks off with his fingers) all his points so that everybody can understand?
5. Confuse Wolf Blitzer even more so that he'll ask her again if she's being naive?

JA Cook   February 5th, 2008 4:37 pm ET

Hillary, please just answer the lingering questions…

On how to enforce your health care, you've admitted that garnishing wages is one way, so we'll let that one slide.

My biggest question is how can you go to the White House without Bill?

With him with you, my vote is elsewhere.

No freelance Presidents! No third terms!

No Bill Clinton in '08!!

Sam   February 5th, 2008 4:37 pm ET

Challenging an opponent to as many debates as possible has always been the resort of a losing campaign desperate to capture headlines… I wonder what her internals are telling her about today's vote to make her so desperate….

Sis   February 5th, 2008 4:37 pm ET

On Fox? What does Hillary have up her pants suit sleeve? No thanks.

T. Renee   February 5th, 2008 4:37 pm ET

I think this would be a great thing!! I am an Obama supporter and I thought he did a great job at the debate in LA. The debate really demonstrated that he can be specific about his proposed plans and policies.

Obama '08!!

me   February 5th, 2008 4:37 pm ET

You mean "Barack" the vote!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

J. Steven Alter   February 5th, 2008 4:37 pm ET

Of course the Clinton Campaign wants as many debates as possible. The questions should be, 'What format and type of debate?' If the debates will permit in depth and thoughtful discourse on the complex and challenging topics that currently face all Americans, I am certain that Senator Obama would welcome the opportunity; if, on the other hand, Senator Clinton and her campaign wish to promote a short answer format in which complex issues like Healthcare, Iraq, or the Economy are reduced to two minute rehearsed answers and canned quips — well, we can all just listen to another stump speech.

The simple fact is that our challenges are rarely simple, and demand thoughtful investigation, dialogue, and debate. Obama is a serious candidate with real thoughts and ideas for our future (I happen to believe the same is true for Clinton, BTW, though I believe Obama's vision is the better to lead us forward), and if we give both candidates the opportunity to truly debate the issues, we will all benefit.

Perhaps the debates should be topical — one for Iraq, one for the healthcare, etc.?

Anonymous   February 5th, 2008 4:37 pm ET

I hope obama Flat Says NO!!! The truth is he does good in debates but more on the level of people seeing him for who he is, and his honesty and integrity comes though, but at the same time that is not his most comfortable setting.

in debates you have to give consistent sound bites, and have memorized lines… and Obviously Obama likes to Think before he speaks and actually answer the question being asked with some thought, which doesn't work well in a fast paced debate.

I'm sure he'll have to do a debate between no and then, but I hope they just do One with Fox and maybe One with CNN and call it a day!

1 or 2 debates is enough!!!!

john   February 5th, 2008 4:36 pm ET

How about a debate with every day people that have questions that don't get ask by the media or that the canidates know are coming

scott,manchester NH   February 5th, 2008 4:36 pm ET

doesnt it sound like a more "logical consideration" that if we dont read in this news snippet that mr Obama is enthusiasticaly in support of that kind of debate schedule, that what SHOULD BE the MOST important element of running for prez (debating and making your case to the american people) might pose a problem for the less experienced candidate………..

…………..is all the answer we need about who's got what it takes…??

maybe Oprah can be there with obama to help with that too…

Adam   February 5th, 2008 4:36 pm ET

They need more debates because clearly in the few they have had, the American public hasn't realized how "empty" everything Oba says is actually. Talk about a man leading on a surplus of NAIVE Americans. The fact that someone with his ideas and credentials has made it this far only exacerbates the fall of America in the rest of the world's eyes.

WAKE UP AMERICA – Hillary '08. We need leaders with the ability to materialize the changes we all want! Don't be a victim of false promises 12 months from now.

Adam, New York   February 5th, 2008 4:36 pm ET

Go HIllary! Obama is afraid to face off with you because he has NO SUBSTANCE!

eg   February 5th, 2008 4:36 pm ET

she is an excellent debater. all I can say to you Obama star struck fans is SCAREDY CAT SCAREDY CAT

MissouriDrew   February 5th, 2008 4:36 pm ET

Get ready to get blown away Obama!!

Dirty-Media   February 5th, 2008 4:35 pm ET

I am so tired of haters – you are all so pathetic

Inspire people – what about economy – inspire that too

ABC = Anybody But Clinton   February 5th, 2008 4:35 pm ET

Ummmmmmmmmmmm…..no. Isn't she out of hot air yet? How is she going to answer her "I will garnish the wages of those who won't pay for Health Care" comment?

jess   February 5th, 2008 4:35 pm ET

WHAT A PLOY!!!

Rex, Toledo, Ohio   February 5th, 2008 4:35 pm ET

Debates are played out. We've heard plenty from both of them. Obamas truths and Clintons lies. I've made up my mind.

Tim, MN   February 5th, 2008 4:35 pm ET

Of course Obama doesn't want debates, there's no speech writer to write INSPIRE speech for him, he'll have to use his own wisdom and experience to make his point, which he clearly lacks to compare to Hillary.

Frank   February 5th, 2008 4:35 pm ET

How superficial can you people be?!!!! If he is not scared of being discovered that he has really nothing to offer and that he has to be told what to say and what to do for each appearance, why would be not come out and let the people hear him talk about issues?

Independent in IA   February 5th, 2008 4:35 pm ET

Clinton eats him alive in debates. The Repubs would chew him up and spit out the little pieces.

Anon, San Francisco   February 5th, 2008 4:35 pm ET

You mean I'm going to have go hear that rambling rationalization for her Iraq vote once a weeK?!

"35 years…"

"Ready on day one."

There, I just saved everyone a bunch of time. Now I'm off to vote for Obama.

BCNU purple state, usa   February 5th, 2008 4:35 pm ET

If she would ever say anything more in-depth than "ready on day one", "35 years of experience", and boo-hoo-hoo it might be worth it. Otherwise it's just a waste. He'd mop the floor with her again and again anyway. He's much quicker on his feet and is not afraid to venture outside of slogan land.

Steve   February 5th, 2008 4:34 pm ET

Ah yes, that's exactly what we need – at least once a week hearing candidates spin issues that they both agree on into 90 second bites, with the occasional personal insult that results in the spontaneous media explosion. Fantastic. Hillary Clinton is the only person in the world who could actually enjoy such contrived and obsolete politics.

natthedem   February 5th, 2008 4:34 pm ET

Now she wants to debate on FOX?

Ken, Austin TX   February 5th, 2008 4:34 pm ET

Funny how I don't remember Clinton requesting any "one on one: debates when she was ahead of Barack by 20%+. We are tired of hearing your "words" and your constant talks of experience, HIllary. Don't you get the point…we are great need of someone who is ready to take on some serious actions!
Barack Obama 08 all the way!

Dirty-Media   February 5th, 2008 4:34 pm ET

************************************

You are afraid of facts comes out strait and need a cooked story

All you haters – Media is dirtier than politics and there should be more debates instead

Hillary 08

************************************

CHERYL   February 5th, 2008 4:34 pm ET

THIS IS GREAT! IF BORACK IS STILL AROUND AFTER TOMORROW HILLARY CAN PUT HIM IN HIS PLACE LIKE EVERY OTHER DEBATE! EXPERIENCE WINS EVERY TIME! GO HILLARY! FLORIDA IS BEHIND YOU!

Andy   February 5th, 2008 4:34 pm ET

Certainly interesting timing. The Clinton regime must think this is advantageous to them. Solely on those grounds, I would avoid it if I were Obama.

Harvey   February 5th, 2008 4:34 pm ET

all of you say Obama is such a great speaker so where does all this fear come from? You should be proud and say YES WE CAN since its the only 3 words you can comprehend. You are right talk is cheap without substance–Obama proved that so I can agree with you Go Hilliary 08-16

Jared   February 5th, 2008 4:33 pm ET

1.) Hillary is running out of money, and wants free radio time.

2.) She is trying to stop the inspiring of people by Obama.

3.) She is scared about tonight. Notice the first requested debate. Feb 7th. Does someone want to curb the Super Tuesday news?

4.) No thanks Hillary. I'm too busy campaigning and speaking to the people.

John Dolan   February 5th, 2008 4:33 pm ET

Let's see if Obama accepts he has been hiding behind his speeches but when the lights are out and the media goes home no one knows where he stands on the issues. He is a very weak candidate for the white house.

BRC   February 5th, 2008 4:33 pm ET

Sounds more to me like she calling him out to start dealing with the tough questions…
More info is better than less people!
Sheesh!

Roman, Philadelphia   February 5th, 2008 4:33 pm ET

She wasn't calling for these debates when she was the front-runner. She wasn't demanding that Florida and Michigan have their delegates seated when she was the front-runner. The spin is so strong I think I'm getting dizzy.

Antonio   February 5th, 2008 4:33 pm ET

seems like these obama supporters are worried that Hillary will kick his butt. Man if I was Obama, I would take it the challenge and gain experience. But you know what I'm not him and I'm glad. He will suck in all of them liked he sucked on the last one. Ummm, Mmm, Umm. Man he sound more like GW than a president.

Matt   February 5th, 2008 4:33 pm ET

Hillary always performs well in these debates.

Substance over style. Hillary '08.

Dem08   February 5th, 2008 4:33 pm ET

Are you Obama fans worried. You know Hillary has won all the debates and she clearly is the best debater. It would be great to see these two go head to head on issues. If Obama is as great as you all think, then there should be no reason to over blow this idea.

I feel some or afriad that their canidate can not keep up.

Matthew   February 5th, 2008 4:33 pm ET

It's a tactic to detract time from the campaign trail. The Clinton campaign knows that the more time Obama has to spend in each state the bigger the lead he is going to accrue and this is a way to marginalize that effect.

Allan Woodland Hills, CA.   February 5th, 2008 4:33 pm ET

Sounds like Howard Wolfsons bravado is gone…….he should be careful for what he wishes for……..
GO BARACK

nc voter   February 5th, 2008 4:32 pm ET

Clinton is not expected to win anything until March. She is also probably low on cash. This is a strategic way to get publicity and try and keep some momentum.

If Obama declines she will say he does not want to discuss the issues.

Seth   February 5th, 2008 4:32 pm ET

Anytime Hillary Clinton speaks in debate I am confused.She keeps changing her postion in every debate.For example:

In South Carolina debate Clinton said she is going to pull troops from Iraq in one year and in California debate she says she will not give us definite date for pullout?

Before Nevada caucus she said she would approve to give drivers license to all illegal immigrants and in California debate she says she will not?

I am confused……………..

Sis   February 5th, 2008 4:32 pm ET

No thanks Hillary. We know you are a policy wonk. But because of your divisiveness you can never deliver. I am voting for change that will get things done with Obama.

mike   February 5th, 2008 4:32 pm ET

Why? So it can take him away from the big Mo he gets by actually getting his name out and campaigning in states that do not know him. Smart but desperate on her part….and she is supposed to be the frontrunner? It is becoming clear that Sen. Clinton is going to have to work really hard if she gets the nomination because her boat has a ton of holes right now.

Jason   February 5th, 2008 4:32 pm ET

She does rock the debates, there's really no denying it (if you've been watching them).

Jeff, Dallas TX   February 5th, 2008 4:32 pm ET

She wants the debates because she knows that she can take Obama on the issues.
With all due respect to Obama, she generally always favors better on the debates.
I'm a little dissapointed he has not stepped up and agreed. If he truely wants to be President he should be able to go toe to toe with a policy wonk like Hillary.

Ratgurl   February 5th, 2008 4:32 pm ET

What can she possibly have to say that hasn't already been said? Does she have nothing else to do??? Try being a Senator for NY. You still carry the title, and you're still getting the paycheck! Campaigning shouldn't take as much time as our government takes for it. The public could use a break, too!

Eric - Chicago, IL   February 5th, 2008 4:31 pm ET

I like Obama's face in this picture.

AC, Silicon Valley, CA   February 5th, 2008 4:31 pm ET

…and who will be paying for these debates?

Brandy, NJ   February 5th, 2008 4:31 pm ET

Obama doesn't like one-on-ones because it shows his true lack of understanding and intelligence on issues. This isn't a matter of him being ignorant but rather lack of experience. Another 8 years and he will have had time to make true difference in congress … gain a better understanding of the issues facing the nation … and then he will be ready to lead the nation to greatness.

Clinton has the experience today. She may not be inspirational like Obama. But she has the knowledge, experience and the fight in her to get some of the nation's toughest issues in check. Then it will be Obama's turn.

Clinton today.
Obama tomorrow.

Dan, NJ   February 5th, 2008 4:31 pm ET

CALCULATED.

Dowell   February 5th, 2008 4:31 pm ET

This is not needed…I'd rather have Obama just take over the country…one state at a time…the more he gets out…the more we all can start to get down to business…we are worker bees for a new government…and we are ready!!!Let the entertainment industry get writers and get shows…we have our world to take back…Hillary should debate solo

S. Hunt   February 5th, 2008 4:30 pm ET

hmm…What is he scared of?

BABucher, NYC   February 5th, 2008 4:30 pm ET

One debate a week is a bit excessive, considering there's going to be months of campaigning left, and not a whole lot of differences in the issues. No one would watch after a few!

This is clearly an attempt by the Clinton campaign to corner Obama, especially since Clinton's been a slightly stronger debater and Obama the better stump speaker.

Eric - Chicago, IL   February 5th, 2008 4:30 pm ET

Hillary should be pushing for less debates. With every successive debate I've seen Barack's performance go from lackluster to phenomenal, with Hillary just doing "OK" in each of them.

The more debates there are, the more chance for Obama to prove he is a candidate of substance, which counters one of the biggest arguements against him.

Jen, Gainesville   February 5th, 2008 4:30 pm ET

I do not learn anything new from the debates. Merely sound bites. Useless.

J. McCaskill, MS   February 5th, 2008 4:30 pm ET

Of course Obama haven't said he would do that. Why? Because he has no substance. When discussing the issues, he know he will lose to Hillary Clinton. The only issue he talks up on is the subject of Iraq. It's easy to say what you didn't do when you were not in the Senate to vote. Then again he probably who have abstained from voting. I don't think you can vote present in the U.S. Senate.

Hillary Clinton '08′

suzy   February 5th, 2008 4:30 pm ET

Excellent!!!!
Nothing is better than watching Hillary in a debate to truly appreciate her knowledge,
her experience, and her person.
GO HILLARY!!!!!!!!!!

stan pitts pa   February 5th, 2008 4:30 pm ET

HRC you are starting to sound desperate, are you scared you might lose big tonight?

Jatts4Clinton   February 5th, 2008 4:29 pm ET

That is very brave of the Clinton Camp.

Another reason why she is a better candidate this time than Obama. She is a brave woman, and she can handle the Republicans more strongly, as she has proven in all the debates.

Also one more thing, on the iraq vote thing, well, if I am even a senator during when the vote was conducted, than I should not make a issue on that either way. He has shown his leadership skills by voting Present so many times, when he had the chance to vote Yes or No in IL state senate and then being absent in some crucial votes at US senate as well.

Sorry Obama, I'll vote for you in 2016 for sure.

TN   February 5th, 2008 4:29 pm ET

Why not? I would love to hear them debate more. But please ask the same questions of both candidates.

JB Hull, IA   February 5th, 2008 4:29 pm ET

What could possibly discussed in four more debates that hasn't been covered yet?

LisaMpls   February 5th, 2008 4:29 pm ET

Why has the Obama campaign yet to make a decision about the debates? We as the voters deserve to see them facing off on the tough issues. In MN we've seen countless commercials from Sen. Obama. They don't help in deciding who will be the better President. However, the previous debates sure helped me decide for whom I'm voting tonight. You can read the candidate's issue pages all day long, but they seem to come alive during the debates.

NO MORE BUSH!!!   February 5th, 2008 4:28 pm ET

NOTHING MORE THAN A POLITICAL PLOY BY hILLARY TO MAKE PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT SHE AND BARACK ARE GOING TO RUN ON THE SAME TICKET, SO JUST LIKE WITH BILL, SHE IS TRYING TO RIDE OBAMA'S COAT TAILS ALL TEH WAY TO THE WHITEHOUSE….

saire   February 5th, 2008 4:28 pm ET

HILLARY NEEDS MONEY. It is her purpose for calling for the debate plus she is losing.

go home hillary!!!!!!!!!!!

Kevin   February 5th, 2008 4:28 pm ET

If they're all as good as the one on CNN last week, I say bring it on.

HH   February 5th, 2008 4:28 pm ET

I thought they said they will get delegates from left to right and wrap this thing up on Feb5.

California for Obama!

Evin   February 5th, 2008 4:28 pm ET

Her campaign is in panic mode, and this is evidence. Clearly, she's hurting for attention — first with yesterday's crying reprise, and now by seeking free air time.

One debate a week would be ridiculous, unenlightening, and perhaps even counterproductive to the Democratic race. Obama should agree to, at most, one debate over the next month. Stick to your guns, Barack!

saire   February 5th, 2008 4:27 pm ET

hillary is trying to start a fight on tv. obama does not have to do it. hillary knows she has lost.

AJ   February 5th, 2008 4:26 pm ET

Obama doesnt want to debate. Then he has to come up with specifics and he doesnt have any. He's a snake oil salesman that can only speak in platitudes.

teddy orlando fl   February 5th, 2008 4:26 pm ET

OMG can you say desperation

Blessing Orage   February 5th, 2008 4:25 pm ET

I think the latest smear has begun even before the polls close at the washington post where you are asked to click on a picture to see Sen Obama's grand mother and boom you get hit with information that Sen Hillary Clinton has swept all 22 states including Illinois. This is a blatant attempt to influence the votes! It is morrally wrong!!!!!!!

this is wrong! We should have no moral authority to put the country to war trying to give other countries the voice and opportunity to elect whom they choose!

This is absurd!

Blessing
California

Trading wine for beer   February 5th, 2008 4:25 pm ET

Great idea!!

Frank Ruzicka   February 5th, 2008 4:25 pm ET

Total desperation when the "front runner" is asking for a debate, period.

I love CNN   February 5th, 2008 4:25 pm ET

Usually it's the underdog that calls for frequent debates.

Hillary Clinton refused to debate her primary opponent in 2006.

Dowell   February 5th, 2008 4:24 pm ET

This is not needed…I'd rather have Obama just take over the country…one state at a time…the more he gets out…the more we all can start to get down to business…we are worker bees for a new government…and we are ready!!!Let the entertainment industry get writers and get shows…we have our world to take back…Hillary should debate solo…Personaility 1—on one stance…Personaility 2-On the other…

I know Obama would hate to see a message like this one that I have typed…but we have to get him in office…

Alex   February 5th, 2008 4:24 pm ET

Looks like she's scared of losing now.

Frontrunners rarely demand debates.

Alison, FL   February 5th, 2008 4:23 pm ET

Of course!…lol…is this a joke?? Now she wants a war of words..does she really think the American people want to listen to her talk consistently???..TALK IS CHEAP HILLARY!

Mike M   February 5th, 2008 4:23 pm ET

Desperate Times Calls For Desperate Measures. I'm sure she wouldnt want the debate if Obama hadn't stolen her thunder.

Just keep crying on TV….

UGOGIRL   February 5th, 2008 4:23 pm ET

Way to go girl, you ROCK THE DEBATES!

Scott, Royal Oak   February 5th, 2008 4:23 pm ET

you've got it, Hillary. take some cough drops and bring it onnnnn.

Logical Consideration   February 5th, 2008 4:22 pm ET

Sounds like someone is suddenly worried about a tide of momentum going the other direction?

Xavier, Washington, DC   February 5th, 2008 4:22 pm ET

A debate a week? Does she not have other things to do? I guess she wants to slow Barack down by making him pause his campaigning so they can keep making the same arguments over and over. Don't let her dictate your schedule, Barack.

Peter   February 5th, 2008 4:20 pm ET

The Obama people laugh at this. They know his weaknesses. He will do as few debates as possible. Did you see Clinton back up in the National Polls? Well, CNN won't report it, but it's true.

Melissa in CA   February 5th, 2008 4:20 pm ET

The Clintons are getting desperate.

Frankly, I'm tired of their tactics and games.

We need honest honorable people in power.

Sorry Hillary, you two had your chance for eight years, and you couldn't give us health care.

Time for a new generation.

Ron   February 5th, 2008 4:20 pm ET

Why!

If we do not know their position by now. We never will. Another reason for a nationalone day primary. This thing lasting for months is ridiculous. All this money taht could go to more important things is a waste

trisha2   February 5th, 2008 4:19 pm ET

that's because the man is scared.

SecondSage   February 5th, 2008 4:19 pm ET

Get her, accept the challenge.

You're not afraid of her.

Obama '08

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room. Download this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

Follow us on Twitter

CNN on TwitterGet Ticker updates the moment they appear online via the Web, SMS, or instant messages.
Follow politicalticker

Categories
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. All comments should be relevant to the topic and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. You are solely responsible for your own comments, the consequences of posting those comments, and the consequences of any reliance by you on the comments of others. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying and other information you provide via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2008 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com VIP