February 5, 2008
Posted: February 5th, 2008 06:58 PM ET

The "change vs. experience" debate continues to play out.

(CNN) - It’s the great debate in the Democratic Party this election: change vs. experience. And early exit polls from the Democratic contests show that debate continues to rage, and is a key factor in whether voters are choosing Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton.

Out exit polls show that 74 percent of voters who supported Obama Tuesday did so because they want a president who can bring about change. That compares to 11 percent of Obama voters who said they want a president who "cares about people," and 3 percent who said they want an experienced president.

Meanwhile, Clinton voters said they wanted experience first and foremost - 45 percent of the New York senator's supporters named experience as the key reason for their choice, compared to 29 percent who said change and 15 percent who said they wanted a candidate who cared about people.

Clinton has tried to appeal to “change voters,” saying she is the one with the experience to bring it about. But these exit polls indicate she may not be making that sale.

Related: Watch CNN's Candy Crowley analyze how Clinton will fare in Super Tuesday states

–CNN Senior Political Analyst Bill Schneider

Filed under: Bill Schneider


Debbie   February 5th, 2008 9:00 pm ET

I'm with you Bob! Everyone running has enough experience. We need someone who won't divide us any further, but will be willing to work with everyone, not just those who fear us or already agree with us, like Bush.

Bob T. - Napa, CA   February 5th, 2008 8:50 pm ET

If experience is touted to be the primary factor in determining who should be our next "FEARLESS LEADER OF THE FREE WORLD" – why is not our Incumbent Vice President running for election – on the record of the CURRENT ADMINISTRATION"S EXPERIENCE?

We do not need the kind of "EXPERIENCE" the Bush Administration has burdened us with – in the World's eyes! – Thank you. Look at what we are left to deal with – in terms of cleaning up all the messes created by the current administration. The Republicans will be lucky if they are even able to take back control of Congress for the next 12 years in my opinion....

We need some FRESH thinkers in Washington, in order to establish the faintest hint of CREDABILITY with the rest of the World's nations. I will Take Obama in a HEARTBEAT over any of the other candidates from either party – even an Independant Candidate.

Any other like minded individuals out there who think the same thoughts – please respond!

mr.fair tax   February 5th, 2008 8:48 pm ET

CHANGE , YOU DEMO'S
DON'T CRY TO ME WHEN YOUR KIDS AND GRANDKIDS WIND UP CURSING YOU OUT ONE DAY!!!
IF THEY ARE LIVING IN FREEDON AT ALL!

RICK   February 5th, 2008 8:46 pm ET

If this had not been used before, most would say ..Obama.... you are no Jack Kennedy.

Lynn   February 5th, 2008 8:42 pm ET

Change can't be judged by WORD. If all the word is empty,
what will you expect from the candidate?

mk   February 5th, 2008 8:33 pm ET

Change, change, and change is necessary especially when people with so called 35 years of experience intentionally undermined the peace and security of not just Americans but other innocent people around the world by voting to wage war this was based on fallacy. This is why it is so important that we have new generation of leaders who will make use of every available means in any given moment before resulting to the use of force. I do believe that Obama has enough experience to shape the future of America as well as the entire world. I believe this because his record of bringing people together is clear. Obama will eradicate the idea of bieng with us or against us. This concept has made the world a dangerous place for all.

By the way, how many years of experience does one need to be a good president? Is it 5, 10, 20 or 100 years? I hope you get the message. It is time for politicians of the old order to give way to agents of cahange like Obama.

Ruthie Rader   February 5th, 2008 8:25 pm ET

They look like they're singing a duet in that photo-split.

Yeah! Watch out, everybody: Here come your new American idols!

Cue the baying hounds.

Ross   February 5th, 2008 8:07 pm ET

Would someone please inform Obama's supporters that race is not an issue. I can imagine the outcry should Hillary reveive 90% of the white vote. But of course that would be a vote for Hillary for the wrong reason. As usual, Bill was right.......just shouldn't have said so out loud

moba10   February 5th, 2008 8:01 pm ET

ABC News WILL print it

Jonathan Forbes--Independent   February 5th, 2008 8:01 pm ET

Come on, who says that Hillary Clinton has more experience than Obama. 8 years as first lady (an unelected postion)–does that give her experience? No it does not. She is in the first half of her second term of U.S. senator. Obama is in the latter part of his first term, but he has been a state senator as well.

If you count it up, Obama has had more experience in elected office than Hillary Clinton has.

John   February 5th, 2008 8:00 pm ET

Go Obama 08

moba10   February 5th, 2008 8:00 pm ET

CNN = Clinton News Network LMAO

Debbie   February 5th, 2008 7:55 pm ET

I hesitate to bring this up because I'm afraid that we're getting into a race battle here, but I'm white and I support Obama. What I want to know is why we keep calling him a black candidate. If I'm not mistaken, his mother was white. Why can't we claim him as white also?

laverne turner   February 5th, 2008 7:50 pm ET

hey rechi i'm black and i voted for obama but all of the black elected officials endorsed hillary clinton. the black democrats are not being racist we are doing what iowa set the trend for, so don't cry because obama is winning be happy because unracist white people are leading the bandwagon now stop being silly and put that good guy in the white house.

Olav   February 5th, 2008 7:49 pm ET

Iraq is part of todays problem, but it is also the part of the solution.When the billions of dollars spent to no good in Iraq can find a better way to be spent in the US economy. Bring the boys home !

Debbie   February 5th, 2008 7:48 pm ET

I guess using JP's argument, I would have 13 years as a lion tamer...I'm a teacher!

Leslie   February 5th, 2008 7:47 pm ET

Wade – I don't think anyone old enough to vote should be referred to as "girls". Thank you for showing your sexism and reminding us women that we have a long way to go to be treated equally. Makes sense now why you won't entertain voting for someone who is intensely qualified to be president, but who happens to be female.

wade   February 5th, 2008 7:40 pm ET

When your experience allows you to vote wrong on the biggest vote in the last 8 years (Iraq) I don't see how it counts for anything.

A boomer who saw Vietnam play out should have known better, and would have except for trying to position herself politically.

Girls, take heart, there WILL someday be a women candidate - not a wife following in the footsteps of her husband - that we can all support and that will be the 1st women President, but at this time we should be looking forward, not backward.

Olav   February 5th, 2008 7:40 pm ET

Of course we all expect change. Any president coming out of this election will have to be better than GWB.
Hope to see Barack will take John Kerry as a running mate. That team should be experienced.

Frank McElwaine   February 5th, 2008 7:38 pm ET

CNN should show a graph by state showing delegates available,committed,uncommitted prorated states, how it goes to conventions, etc. it would be a great draw especially for those sports addicts now that NFL is finished . I'm an alternate delegate from Pa CD7. Most voters don't understand how the delegates are even elected,etc..It would be informative and increase your followers and prform a civic service.
Frank McElwaine West Chester,Pa.

Can I EVER get posted?!   February 5th, 2008 7:35 pm ET

JP- By your argument, then Obama would REALLY not stand a chance against McCain since he has even less experience than HiIllary. And even Hillary's critics- including Obama himself- don't doubt her experience.

Another Question   February 5th, 2008 7:32 pm ET

Name me 5 president besides Reagan and Kennedy who had tons of great experience and was remembered as a great president.

I'll name you 2 who had only a few years of experience and changed the nation. George Washington and Abraham Lincoln.

Can there be change with only 10 yrs Federal Experience....

Yes there Can!!!

Rechi   February 5th, 2008 7:27 pm ET

If we look at the statistics, it's very clear that among black voters this has become a very racial issue as almost 90% of them are voting for Obama and that's the reason Obama is winning. If the whites also started voting the way black are voting, Obama will not win a single state. It's a shame for a democratic country when one group of people become tend to become so much racist. Sorry for America indeed...

Duop Wuol, Colorado Springs, Colorado   February 5th, 2008 7:19 pm ET

Our country is at war, Our foreing policy is somehow broken, the economy is nearing what we may never imagine, and we are deeply divided. Any one who is going to become our next president must deal with these vital issues.

Prakaithip   February 5th, 2008 7:19 pm ET

On The Job Training is NOT ACCEPTABLE. Not now, not ever for President... it's too risky folks. Look what happened with Bush. Clearly, Kerry had more experience. Wakeup.

Vic   February 5th, 2008 7:19 pm ET

Bill,
What does it really mean? It is fine that people desiring change voted for Obama and who chose experience voted Clinton. What percentage of democratic voters choose change v.s experience is the only significant factor to make sense of your post. Thanks

Deanna   February 5th, 2008 7:14 pm ET

change ,shmange. All dems want something new. I think a shot for a woman to run the country is actually the most refreshing thing the U.S has had to offer in decades.

HIllary   February 5th, 2008 7:12 pm ET

Thanks for NAFTA and the 90's hillary. now please leave this race gracefully

theresa lv   February 5th, 2008 7:10 pm ET

Still have NOT been able to figure out what HRC's experience is. Experience making bad judgements and sending people to their death is not the type of experience I prefer.

JP   February 5th, 2008 7:09 pm ET

I really wish someone would clarify this "35 years experience" Sen. Clinton keeps touting–essentially since she's been out of law school. By the same standards Obama would have 25 years experience. I'm sorry but being the governor's and president's wife without national security clearance doesn't count for much. If someone doesn't start calling her on this soon, I'm sure the Republicans will– if she's the nominee. Not to mention if this is her main strength, it doesn't hold a candle to McCain.

Eric   February 5th, 2008 7:00 pm ET

What this actually means is that Obama voters voted for change and Hillary voters voted for experience. You did not give us the overall numbers Bill although they probably back up your premise.

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room. Download this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

twitter
Categories
Powered by WordPress.com VIP