<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Schneider: Clinton losing among whites and blacks in California</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/</link>
	<description>All politics, all the time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:07:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blake</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-480768</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 07:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-480768</guid>
		<description>As a young progressive....18 and a male by the way and I&#039;m for hillary. And no, i&#039;m not buying into the hype that obama cultists spew. Don&#039;t misunderstand, I like and agree with obama&#039;s ideas and dreams, however idealistic rhetoric means nothing to me. As a realist and a pragmatist, at least i understand that ideals don&#039;t  change reality ex. Bush. Spreading democracy anyone?. HIllary Clinton understands the realities, and change with bi-partisanship is never easy as orating a pre-written scripted immediate demand for change. Ah yes..of course the republican spin machine is simply going to  fall over for the saintness of obama. I still remember the swiftboating and &quot;flip-flopping&quot; kerry against a draft-dodging and war mongering candidate that should&#039;ve lost by double digits. A anti-war vietnam veteran and a purple heart recipient...thats as patriotic as u can get. Kerry failed to get tough, which i see also in Obama. 

Of course its understandable that the &quot;youth&quot; should be behind such a &quot;cool&quot; canidate. Understandable as I am also part of the mtv generation, Where obviously style is valued over substance. It peeves me greatly as this country&#039;s reputation and status is at stake. Particulary, when i ask many of my peers why they support obama, they say change,i ask what change? they respond with again change. What constitutes as change?How is he different from Hillary in healthcare or the economy?Then they start ranting and attacking hillary on personality, dynasty, evil politicians etc, Stuff that has nothing to do with her qualifications as commander in chief. I have also never seen such blatant bias in the MSM against such a qualitfied candidate that has actual substance and experience.
Note to hillary-haters and obama cultists: perhaps it would do better for your cause if  you would prefer to enlighten us about the specifics of  obama&#039;s qualifications, policies etc and how they  are better than hillary&#039;s.then maybe just attacking hillary and spouting conspiracy theories about how corrupt and racist the clintons are.just a suggestion. 
GO HIillary!!! Congratulations on winning my home state California.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a young progressive....18 and a male by the way and I'm for hillary. And no, i'm not buying into the hype that obama cultists spew. Don't misunderstand, I like and agree with obama's ideas and dreams, however idealistic rhetoric means nothing to me. As a realist and a pragmatist, at least i understand that ideals don't  change reality ex. Bush. Spreading democracy anyone?. HIllary Clinton understands the realities, and change with bi-partisanship is never easy as orating a pre-written scripted immediate demand for change. Ah yes..of course the republican spin machine is simply going to  fall over for the saintness of obama. I still remember the swiftboating and "flip-flopping" kerry against a draft-dodging and war mongering candidate that should've lost by double digits. A anti-war vietnam veteran and a purple heart recipient...thats as patriotic as u can get. Kerry failed to get tough, which i see also in Obama. </p>
<p>Of course its understandable that the "youth" should be behind such a "cool" canidate. Understandable as I am also part of the mtv generation, Where obviously style is valued over substance. It peeves me greatly as this country's reputation and status is at stake. Particulary, when i ask many of my peers why they support obama, they say change,i ask what change? they respond with again change. What constitutes as change?How is he different from Hillary in healthcare or the economy?Then they start ranting and attacking hillary on personality, dynasty, evil politicians etc, Stuff that has nothing to do with her qualifications as commander in chief. I have also never seen such blatant bias in the MSM against such a qualitfied candidate that has actual substance and experience.<br />
Note to hillary-haters and obama cultists: perhaps it would do better for your cause if  you would prefer to enlighten us about the specifics of  obama's qualifications, policies etc and how they  are better than hillary's.then maybe just attacking hillary and spouting conspiracy theories about how corrupt and racist the clintons are.just a suggestion.<br />
GO HIillary!!! Congratulations on winning my home state California.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qing</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-475896</link>
		<dc:creator>qing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-475896</guid>
		<description>I do not think any Demo favor Iraq war once the facts were exposed. We can&#039;t always go back to see what one thing over the others. I strongly apposed war at time. But I understood there are some complications during their decision processes especially with made up reports by Bush Admin.

Clinton is more elect-able than Obama. She was attacked by Republicans for years. We know what would look like when compete with Republican nominee. 

In addition, Clinton got detailed plans for executions. How long will get Obama there and how? If the medical insurance is not mandatory, how much difference it will be from now? It is off track of Democ’s mission. What Republicans held to against him is a mystery since he had never been an effective contender in the past.

I am more concerned of his connection with Louis Farrakhan. What else? Any explosive bomb will take Demo out of the picture? Do you really what to see that happen?

Go Hillary!!!!!!!!! Universal Medicare is the way of USA!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not think any Demo favor Iraq war once the facts were exposed. We can't always go back to see what one thing over the others. I strongly apposed war at time. But I understood there are some complications during their decision processes especially with made up reports by Bush Admin.</p>
<p>Clinton is more elect-able than Obama. She was attacked by Republicans for years. We know what would look like when compete with Republican nominee. </p>
<p>In addition, Clinton got detailed plans for executions. How long will get Obama there and how? If the medical insurance is not mandatory, how much difference it will be from now? It is off track of Democ’s mission. What Republicans held to against him is a mystery since he had never been an effective contender in the past.</p>
<p>I am more concerned of his connection with Louis Farrakhan. What else? Any explosive bomb will take Demo out of the picture? Do you really what to see that happen?</p>
<p>Go Hillary!!!!!!!!! Universal Medicare is the way of USA!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca - CA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-475310</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca - CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-475310</guid>
		<description>Thank you SEZME....for some actual &quot;relevant&quot;  information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you SEZME....for some actual "relevant"  information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sezme</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-471423</link>
		<dc:creator>sezme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 11:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-471423</guid>
		<description>Friends:

For a change… your vote matters.

Why Obama matters (see bottom for supporting docs):

Barack Obama opposed the Iraq invasion, indisputably, flatly, boldly,
and with political courage, the same week Clinton voted for the war
and caved to the FOX-media tide.

In 2006, Israel killed hundreds of Lebanese civilians with US cluster
bombs provided by the Pentagon, slaughtering 140 kids (in fact, pieces
of the bombs continue to kill children today.) In response, Senator
Obama voted to limit the Pentagon’s cluster-bomb spending. Clinton,
who could be fairly described as a media cheerleader for the same
Israeli bombing raids, voted against the proposal, helping to defeat
it.

Boldly, in the May Day Rallies of that same year, Obama took another
unpopular but righteous position when he was one of only two US
Senators (Kennedy was the other) to march with illegal immigrants –
families who come here from dire poverty to try to eke out a decent
existence, something any upstanding father or mother would not neglect
to do if they found themselves stuck in a Mexican slum where there is
no clean water, no way of earning money, and plywood and sheet metal
for walls. In the most recent debate, Clinton scapegoated these
immigrants, arguing they take jobs from the US poor, something studies
repeatedly have shown to be a fallacy.

Obama has put together a universal health care package that amounts to
a real sea-change, and he also has provided details to balance its
costs responsibly, which will help his chances of bipartisan success.
Further, the plan includes a Medicare choice that would open a channel
to the development of a national health plan, such as they have in
Canada and Britain, where health care is thought of as a public
service, like how we already deal with the mail, national security,
the police, environmental protection, road service, schools, and so
on….

For a change… your vote matters. 

you know but u just dont wanna accept it...obama is aleader..hillary is just another politician</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Friends:</p>
<p>For a change… your vote matters.</p>
<p>Why Obama matters (see bottom for supporting docs):</p>
<p>Barack Obama opposed the Iraq invasion, indisputably, flatly, boldly,<br />
and with political courage, the same week Clinton voted for the war<br />
and caved to the FOX-media tide.</p>
<p>In 2006, Israel killed hundreds of Lebanese civilians with US cluster<br />
bombs provided by the Pentagon, slaughtering 140 kids (in fact, pieces<br />
of the bombs continue to kill children today.) In response, Senator<br />
Obama voted to limit the Pentagon’s cluster-bomb spending. Clinton,<br />
who could be fairly described as a media cheerleader for the same<br />
Israeli bombing raids, voted against the proposal, helping to defeat<br />
it.</p>
<p>Boldly, in the May Day Rallies of that same year, Obama took another<br />
unpopular but righteous position when he was one of only two US<br />
Senators (Kennedy was the other) to march with illegal immigrants –<br />
families who come here from dire poverty to try to eke out a decent<br />
existence, something any upstanding father or mother would not neglect<br />
to do if they found themselves stuck in a Mexican slum where there is<br />
no clean water, no way of earning money, and plywood and sheet metal<br />
for walls. In the most recent debate, Clinton scapegoated these<br />
immigrants, arguing they take jobs from the US poor, something studies<br />
repeatedly have shown to be a fallacy.</p>
<p>Obama has put together a universal health care package that amounts to<br />
a real sea-change, and he also has provided details to balance its<br />
costs responsibly, which will help his chances of bipartisan success.<br />
Further, the plan includes a Medicare choice that would open a channel<br />
to the development of a national health plan, such as they have in<br />
Canada and Britain, where health care is thought of as a public<br />
service, like how we already deal with the mail, national security,<br />
the police, environmental protection, road service, schools, and so<br />
on….</p>
<p>For a change… your vote matters. </p>
<p>you know but u just dont wanna accept it...obama is aleader..hillary is just another politician</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sezme</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-471386</link>
		<dc:creator>sezme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 11:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-471386</guid>
		<description>Friends:

For a change… your vote matters.

Why Obama matters (see bottom for supporting docs):

Barack Obama opposed the Iraq invasion, indisputably, flatly, boldly,
and with political courage, the same week Clinton voted for the war
and caved to the FOX-media tide.

In 2006, Israel killed hundreds of Lebanese civilians with US cluster
bombs provided by the Pentagon, slaughtering 140 kids (in fact, pieces
of the bombs continue to kill children today.) In response, Senator
Obama voted to limit the Pentagon’s cluster-bomb spending. Clinton,
who could be fairly described as a media cheerleader for the same
Israeli bombing raids, voted against the proposal, helping to defeat
it.

Boldly, in the May Day Rallies of that same year, Obama took another
unpopular but righteous position when he was one of only two US
Senators (Kennedy was the other) to march with illegal immigrants –
families who come here from dire poverty to try to eke out a decent
existence, something any upstanding father or mother would not neglect
to do if they found themselves stuck in a Mexican slum where there is
no clean water, no way of earning money, and plywood and sheet metal
for walls. In the most recent debate, Clinton scapegoated these
immigrants, arguing they take jobs from the US poor, something studies
repeatedly have shown to be a fallacy.

Obama has put together a universal health care package that amounts to
a real sea-change, and he also has provided details to balance its
costs responsibly, which will help his chances of bipartisan success.
Further, the plan includes a Medicare choice that would open a channel
to the development of a national health plan, such as they have in
Canada and Britain, where health care is thought of as a public
service, like how we already deal with the mail, national security,
the police, environmental protection, road service, schools, and so
on….

For a change… your vote matters. 

STOP acting like u dont know...clinton is a politician barack is a leader

obama08!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Friends:</p>
<p>For a change… your vote matters.</p>
<p>Why Obama matters (see bottom for supporting docs):</p>
<p>Barack Obama opposed the Iraq invasion, indisputably, flatly, boldly,<br />
and with political courage, the same week Clinton voted for the war<br />
and caved to the FOX-media tide.</p>
<p>In 2006, Israel killed hundreds of Lebanese civilians with US cluster<br />
bombs provided by the Pentagon, slaughtering 140 kids (in fact, pieces<br />
of the bombs continue to kill children today.) In response, Senator<br />
Obama voted to limit the Pentagon’s cluster-bomb spending. Clinton,<br />
who could be fairly described as a media cheerleader for the same<br />
Israeli bombing raids, voted against the proposal, helping to defeat<br />
it.</p>
<p>Boldly, in the May Day Rallies of that same year, Obama took another<br />
unpopular but righteous position when he was one of only two US<br />
Senators (Kennedy was the other) to march with illegal immigrants –<br />
families who come here from dire poverty to try to eke out a decent<br />
existence, something any upstanding father or mother would not neglect<br />
to do if they found themselves stuck in a Mexican slum where there is<br />
no clean water, no way of earning money, and plywood and sheet metal<br />
for walls. In the most recent debate, Clinton scapegoated these<br />
immigrants, arguing they take jobs from the US poor, something studies<br />
repeatedly have shown to be a fallacy.</p>
<p>Obama has put together a universal health care package that amounts to<br />
a real sea-change, and he also has provided details to balance its<br />
costs responsibly, which will help his chances of bipartisan success.<br />
Further, the plan includes a Medicare choice that would open a channel<br />
to the development of a national health plan, such as they have in<br />
Canada and Britain, where health care is thought of as a public<br />
service, like how we already deal with the mail, national security,<br />
the police, environmental protection, road service, schools, and so<br />
on….</p>
<p>For a change… your vote matters. </p>
<p>STOP acting like u dont know...clinton is a politician barack is a leader</p>
<p>obama08!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hamza</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-471316</link>
		<dc:creator>Hamza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 11:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-471316</guid>
		<description>few questions:
- What Bill will be called if Hilary get the white house?
- Is America short of Talents and Leaders so it is either Clintons or Bushies? I mean this is quite inspired by Third World All-Time leaders?!
- Clinton should stick to its strength, being anything but fun and a source of inspiration! I mean she looks bad when she waves and try to connect to the audience
- Hilarys seems better for VP role with all these Policy Details, President should never worry of the details! I mean this is why there is a Cabinet!
- Obama is appealing to non US citizens, US is not a fortress for its citizen what happens in D.C. affects the Globe, and in Future the space! maybe more delegates to UN representatives?
- Kerry! Oh man ...  no comment
- I cant really understand the Latin Americans Position?! I mean would someone explain what Hilary has accomplished so they are running in her favor? I am trying to understand what polarize or motivate Latin American Votes
- Arab/ or Middle East American voters?
- on Migration: why not proposing a points system?! like Canada, AUS, NewZ, and UK ... later EU</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>few questions:<br />
- What Bill will be called if Hilary get the white house?<br />
- Is America short of Talents and Leaders so it is either Clintons or Bushies? I mean this is quite inspired by Third World All-Time leaders?!<br />
- Clinton should stick to its strength, being anything but fun and a source of inspiration! I mean she looks bad when she waves and try to connect to the audience<br />
- Hilarys seems better for VP role with all these Policy Details, President should never worry of the details! I mean this is why there is a Cabinet!<br />
- Obama is appealing to non US citizens, US is not a fortress for its citizen what happens in D.C. affects the Globe, and in Future the space! maybe more delegates to UN representatives?<br />
- Kerry! Oh man ...  no comment<br />
- I cant really understand the Latin Americans Position?! I mean would someone explain what Hilary has accomplished so they are running in her favor? I am trying to understand what polarize or motivate Latin American Votes<br />
- Arab/ or Middle East American voters?<br />
- on Migration: why not proposing a points system?! like Canada, AUS, NewZ, and UK ... later EU</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nathan</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470962</link>
		<dc:creator>nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 08:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470962</guid>
		<description>CNN may not like it, but Hillary is the democratic candidate!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNN may not like it, but Hillary is the democratic candidate!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470938</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 08:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470938</guid>
		<description>whats with all the hillary campaign spamming. its too obvious, guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whats with all the hillary campaign spamming. its too obvious, guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yvette W.; Princeton, NJ - I'm SOOOOOOO Tired of the media trying to manipulate us....</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470908</link>
		<dc:creator>Yvette W.; Princeton, NJ - I'm SOOOOOOO Tired of the media trying to manipulate us....</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 08:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470908</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m TRULY disgusted with CNN, MSNBC, et al. - 

As I recall, CNN gleefully reported last night  that their &quot;oh so reliable&quot; polls indicated that the &quot;Obama surge&quot; had not only &quot;closed the gap&quot; in California, but that Obama had actually OVERTAKEN Clinton in Cali...This completely contradicted the polls that were taken on Sunday (02/03/05)...

Needless to say, I was stunned  and very suspicious of CNN&#039;s report of  30 POINT INCREASE for Obama virtually OVERNITE....

Well, not only did Hillary win Cali, but thse results were more consistent  with previous polls...Was this intentional or just a mistake???  

In my opinion, these false reports are a DELIBERATE attempt to infuance the outcome of the California primary...

I don&#039;t know about you guys, but I&#039;m TIRED of the media (CNN, MSNBC, etc.) trying to MANIPULATE the outcome these primaries....

Hey CNN - &quot;Yellow Journalism&quot; SERIOUSLY jeopardizes your LEGENDARY JOURNALISTIC INTEGRITY ...After all, you can&#039;t fool all of the people all of the time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm TRULY disgusted with CNN, MSNBC, et al. &#8211; </p>
<p>As I recall, CNN gleefully reported last night  that their "oh so reliable" polls indicated that the "Obama surge" had not only "closed the gap" in California, but that Obama had actually OVERTAKEN Clinton in Cali...This completely contradicted the polls that were taken on Sunday (02/03/05)...</p>
<p>Needless to say, I was stunned  and very suspicious of CNN's report of  30 POINT INCREASE for Obama virtually OVERNITE....</p>
<p>Well, not only did Hillary win Cali, but thse results were more consistent  with previous polls...Was this intentional or just a mistake???  </p>
<p>In my opinion, these false reports are a DELIBERATE attempt to infuance the outcome of the California primary...</p>
<p>I don't know about you guys, but I'm TIRED of the media (CNN, MSNBC, etc.) trying to MANIPULATE the outcome these primaries....</p>
<p>Hey CNN &#8211; "Yellow Journalism" SERIOUSLY jeopardizes your LEGENDARY JOURNALISTIC INTEGRITY ...After all, you can't fool all of the people all of the time...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xx</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470811</link>
		<dc:creator>xx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 07:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470811</guid>
		<description>Mmm...

Here you go again! Even though she is winning, your title still says &quot;loosing&quot;.
You are supposed to be a journalist. Not a trumpet for Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mmm...</p>
<p>Here you go again! Even though she is winning, your title still says "loosing".<br />
You are supposed to be a journalist. Not a trumpet for Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bev</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470755</link>
		<dc:creator>Bev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 07:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470755</guid>
		<description>I have been watching CNN for a long time and have always felt you were fair until this election.  I have never seen a network so biased. I think you are so afraid to say something bad about Obama because you might get accused of being a racist and losing your jobs.  When Hillary wins CNN always has an excuse why she won.  You need to tell it like it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been watching CNN for a long time and have always felt you were fair until this election.  I have never seen a network so biased. I think you are so afraid to say something bad about Obama because you might get accused of being a racist and losing your jobs.  When Hillary wins CNN always has an excuse why she won.  You need to tell it like it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leslie Somerville, Seattle, Washington</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470678</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie Somerville, Seattle, Washington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 07:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470678</guid>
		<description>I am happy for you Hillary that you kicked Obama&#039;s butt today.
HILLARY CLINTON 08</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am happy for you Hillary that you kicked Obama's butt today.<br />
HILLARY CLINTON 08</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coleytot</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470520</link>
		<dc:creator>coleytot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470520</guid>
		<description>As a canadian political observer, I am fascinated of how you conduct your election.  I just love watching the debates, lots of improvement from 2004 getting away from the negative attacks and focus on the issue especially on the democratic side. HURRAY for that.  I hope that the media will focus on the issues and positive comments.  I applauded most of your political commentator (CNN) the way they presented the facts objectively without bias except for Bernstein?? It seems he is spinning bad thoughts about the Clinton&#039;s. OVERALL you guys are doing a GOOD JOB showing to the whole world what DEMOCRACY is all about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a canadian political observer, I am fascinated of how you conduct your election.  I just love watching the debates, lots of improvement from 2004 getting away from the negative attacks and focus on the issue especially on the democratic side. HURRAY for that.  I hope that the media will focus on the issues and positive comments.  I applauded most of your political commentator (CNN) the way they presented the facts objectively without bias except for Bernstein?? It seems he is spinning bad thoughts about the Clinton's. OVERALL you guys are doing a GOOD JOB showing to the whole world what DEMOCRACY is all about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca - CA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470511</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca - CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470511</guid>
		<description>Why is it that I keep seeing this &quot;experience&quot; argument brought up?  Hillary actually has less legislative experience than Mr Obama.  Those of you that believe that, are you sure it is not because you have heard her name out there for so many years?  Don&#039;t confuse her accomplishments with Bill&#039;s....side by side their  (Barack&#039;s &amp; Hillary&#039;s) experience is pretty much the same....except, he has never been a First Lady, and he accomplished all of this at a much younger age.  Barack and Michelle:  No baggage...no scandal....a breath of fresh air, not old bad memories.  I am making another donation.... change is in the air!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it that I keep seeing this "experience" argument brought up?  Hillary actually has less legislative experience than Mr Obama.  Those of you that believe that, are you sure it is not because you have heard her name out there for so many years?  Don't confuse her accomplishments with Bill's....side by side their  (Barack's &amp; Hillary's) experience is pretty much the same....except, he has never been a First Lady, and he accomplished all of this at a much younger age.  Barack and Michelle:  No baggage...no scandal....a breath of fresh air, not old bad memories.  I am making another donation.... change is in the air!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isabelle</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470443</link>
		<dc:creator>Isabelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470443</guid>
		<description>Obama won states tonight that for the most part will vote republican in the fall period.  I like him just fine, but I think the republicans will hand his butt to him if he&#039;s the nominee.  The press has been jumping all over anybody who dares criticize him, but the republicans don&#039;t care and it will work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama won states tonight that for the most part will vote republican in the fall period.  I like him just fine, but I think the republicans will hand his butt to him if he's the nominee.  The press has been jumping all over anybody who dares criticize him, but the republicans don't care and it will work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470369</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470369</guid>
		<description>Both, Obama and Clinton are excellent people for the job.  We should be happy that we don&#039;t have to vote for the lesser of the evils, like the Republicans have to.
This said, I root for Hillary, because Obama will be president for sure down the line), but he still has time to gain more experience and Hillary is 60, this may be her only shot at the job. And yes, she has much more experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both, Obama and Clinton are excellent people for the job.  We should be happy that we don't have to vote for the lesser of the evils, like the Republicans have to.<br />
This said, I root for Hillary, because Obama will be president for sure down the line), but he still has time to gain more experience and Hillary is 60, this may be her only shot at the job. And yes, she has much more experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kapil</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470323</link>
		<dc:creator>Kapil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470323</guid>
		<description>Does the biased CNN and Bill Schneider ever feel the shame of the egg on its face? Are you in a denial mode or something? Why would you just not accept Sen Clinton&#039;s win over Sen Obama? Are you sexists that you would not accept a woman winning over a man?

Grow up CNN, grow up Schneider!!

You cannot get a media&#039;s darling to be the next President of the USA. Americans have a mind of their own.

Learn a lesson from the egg on your face, else you&#039;d be the next to face people&#039;s ire,

I dare CNN to publish this post. Lets see if they&#039;re man enough to read their own criticism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does the biased CNN and Bill Schneider ever feel the shame of the egg on its face? Are you in a denial mode or something? Why would you just not accept Sen Clinton's win over Sen Obama? Are you sexists that you would not accept a woman winning over a man?</p>
<p>Grow up CNN, grow up Schneider!!</p>
<p>You cannot get a media's darling to be the next President of the USA. Americans have a mind of their own.</p>
<p>Learn a lesson from the egg on your face, else you'd be the next to face people's ire,</p>
<p>I dare CNN to publish this post. Lets see if they're man enough to read their own criticism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Ooi</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470246</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Ooi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470246</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not that we &quot;hate&#039;&quot; Obama because he&#039;s black. His speeches make broad &quot;wonderful&quot; statements but where&#039;s the substance? How does he plan to unite all Americans when his campaign was so heavily grounded in appealing to the African American community in the inner cities and deep South? The man just does not come across as being practical or worst still, smacks of insincerity. If there was an African American personlaity that I could have voted for , Collin Powell would have fitted the bill better as a man who spoke his conscience in admitting the mistakes on his speech to the UN. Obama is conveniently absent from having to make all those tough calls.

Some people want change at all cost but some changes can be for the worse. We have already lost almost 8 years to the Bush administration, but going for another greenhorn in the Oval office does not make things right. America cannot afford another failed experiment whether Democrat or Republican. 

Will Mr. Schneider care to have some salt with his crow?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's not that we "hate'" Obama because he's black. His speeches make broad "wonderful" statements but where's the substance? How does he plan to unite all Americans when his campaign was so heavily grounded in appealing to the African American community in the inner cities and deep South? The man just does not come across as being practical or worst still, smacks of insincerity. If there was an African American personlaity that I could have voted for , Collin Powell would have fitted the bill better as a man who spoke his conscience in admitting the mistakes on his speech to the UN. Obama is conveniently absent from having to make all those tough calls.</p>
<p>Some people want change at all cost but some changes can be for the worse. We have already lost almost 8 years to the Bush administration, but going for another greenhorn in the Oval office does not make things right. America cannot afford another failed experiment whether Democrat or Republican. </p>
<p>Will Mr. Schneider care to have some salt with his crow?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470243</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470243</guid>
		<description>HILLARY CLINTON is Tracy Flick as portrayed by Reese Witherspoon in the movie &quot;Election&quot;.

Tracy Flick is an overachiever. She is smart, brilliant, and ambitious, but cold, ruthless and manipulative and running for school president.

Matthew Broderick (her teacher) cannot stand her so he persuades a less smarter but more popular jock everyone likes and who is basically an overall good guy (similar to Obama) to run against her. Tracy does her opponent in, then slowly drives Matthew Broderick, the voice of conscience, into ruin.

I swear, watching what is happening now is like seeing a rerun of &#039;Election&#039;, only real-life adult version. 

Everyone should watch the movie &#039;Election&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HILLARY CLINTON is Tracy Flick as portrayed by Reese Witherspoon in the movie "Election".</p>
<p>Tracy Flick is an overachiever. She is smart, brilliant, and ambitious, but cold, ruthless and manipulative and running for school president.</p>
<p>Matthew Broderick (her teacher) cannot stand her so he persuades a less smarter but more popular jock everyone likes and who is basically an overall good guy (similar to Obama) to run against her. Tracy does her opponent in, then slowly drives Matthew Broderick, the voice of conscience, into ruin.</p>
<p>I swear, watching what is happening now is like seeing a rerun of 'Election', only real-life adult version. </p>
<p>Everyone should watch the movie 'Election'.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samson</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470240</link>
		<dc:creator>Samson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470240</guid>
		<description>I am an Asian American in Los Angeles, CA.  I really tried hard to find reasons to vote for Obama.  I&#039;ve gone to his website to read up his issues.  I&#039;ve gone to his rally.  I watched the debates.  But in the end, he reminded me too much like Bush:  arrogant, condescending, chauvinistic.  He rallied behind change, yet has he changed Illinois politics much?  He voted &quot;present&quot; because it&#039;s part of the Illinois &quot;rough and tumble&quot; politics.  Instead, he should&#039;ve voted yes/no on important issues if he were as independent and free from &quot;same old&quot; as he claimed.  I would&#039;ve loved to vote for the first African-American president today, but Obama was not the man.  I&#039;m glad my vote helped California be Clinton Country!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am an Asian American in Los Angeles, CA.  I really tried hard to find reasons to vote for Obama.  I've gone to his website to read up his issues.  I've gone to his rally.  I watched the debates.  But in the end, he reminded me too much like Bush:  arrogant, condescending, chauvinistic.  He rallied behind change, yet has he changed Illinois politics much?  He voted "present" because it's part of the Illinois "rough and tumble" politics.  Instead, he should've voted yes/no on important issues if he were as independent and free from "same old" as he claimed.  I would've loved to vote for the first African-American president today, but Obama was not the man.  I'm glad my vote helped California be Clinton Country!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dar1031</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470238</link>
		<dc:creator>dar1031</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470238</guid>
		<description>YES  HILLARY CLINTON WINS CALIFORNIA BY A   LANDSLIDE
 
SHE IS NOT THE STATUS QUO CLUTCHING HER PEARLS AT THE THE YACHT CLUB LIKE SOME NONINFORMS PONDER..

 YES CLINTON TAKES CALIFORNIA... READ EM AND WEEP. THE NUMBERS HAVE SPOKEN..

GO ALL THE WAY HILLARY CLINTON  
 GO   VOTE FOR CLINTON  BECAUSE YOUR GREAT GRANDMOTHER COULD NOT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YES  HILLARY CLINTON WINS CALIFORNIA BY A   LANDSLIDE</p>
<p>SHE IS NOT THE STATUS QUO CLUTCHING HER PEARLS AT THE THE YACHT CLUB LIKE SOME NONINFORMS PONDER..</p>
<p> YES CLINTON TAKES CALIFORNIA... READ EM AND WEEP. THE NUMBERS HAVE SPOKEN..</p>
<p>GO ALL THE WAY HILLARY CLINTON<br />
 GO   VOTE FOR CLINTON  BECAUSE YOUR GREAT GRANDMOTHER COULD NOT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jasira</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470204</link>
		<dc:creator>Jasira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470204</guid>
		<description>Its funny that people are complaining about race &amp; gender being a factor in this election. It was always a factor in politics. In 230 some odd years there&#039;s never been a racial minority, female, or combination of both so close to receiving a US Presidential nomination.  Were there never any that could do the job?  Of course there were but bigotry and prejudice held them back. White males and white women have been keeping white males in the most powerful positions of political office since this country began and only now, after re-electing the worst President in our history and allowing this country to crumble, are they desperate enough to consider the possibility of giving someone &quot;different&quot; a chance.

I am black and since gaining the right to vote over 20 years ago I have always done so for one white male or another for President. Racial minorities have demonstrated our willingness to cast our votes for people who don&#039;t look like us. Black people helped carry Bill Clinton in office with over 80% of our vote.  Black women afforded Hillary and many other white women the opportunity to sit with the most powerful leader in the free world as his First Lady - a title no black woman has worn.   Black people voted overwhelmingly for Gore and Kerry. It was not us who dropped the ball and allowed Bush a 2nd term. 

This time its the majorities turn to us show that they can vote for people who don&#039;t look like themselves or aren&#039;t the same sex as themselves. As a black woman I say that I&#039;ve already proven myself and done my part. I like Obama&#039;s message. I think he can be a voice of reason in this troubled world. I think he can do the job well with the right advisors as every President needs. I trust that he&#039;s got black people&#039;s best interest at heart as well as the rest of America and I have never had that comfort. I&#039;m not going to feel guilty about voting on that basis alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its funny that people are complaining about race &amp; gender being a factor in this election. It was always a factor in politics. In 230 some odd years there's never been a racial minority, female, or combination of both so close to receiving a US Presidential nomination.  Were there never any that could do the job?  Of course there were but bigotry and prejudice held them back. White males and white women have been keeping white males in the most powerful positions of political office since this country began and only now, after re-electing the worst President in our history and allowing this country to crumble, are they desperate enough to consider the possibility of giving someone "different" a chance.</p>
<p>I am black and since gaining the right to vote over 20 years ago I have always done so for one white male or another for President. Racial minorities have demonstrated our willingness to cast our votes for people who don't look like us. Black people helped carry Bill Clinton in office with over 80% of our vote.  Black women afforded Hillary and many other white women the opportunity to sit with the most powerful leader in the free world as his First Lady &#8211; a title no black woman has worn.   Black people voted overwhelmingly for Gore and Kerry. It was not us who dropped the ball and allowed Bush a 2nd term. </p>
<p>This time its the majorities turn to us show that they can vote for people who don't look like themselves or aren't the same sex as themselves. As a black woman I say that I've already proven myself and done my part. I like Obama's message. I think he can be a voice of reason in this troubled world. I think he can do the job well with the right advisors as every President needs. I trust that he's got black people's best interest at heart as well as the rest of America and I have never had that comfort. I'm not going to feel guilty about voting on that basis alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470183</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470183</guid>
		<description>absentee ballots and early voting played a large role in the Clinton victory... its got its upsides and downsides.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>absentee ballots and early voting played a large role in the Clinton victory... its got its upsides and downsides.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aloha Independent for Unbias and Objective Media Coverage</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470107</link>
		<dc:creator>Aloha Independent for Unbias and Objective Media Coverage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470107</guid>
		<description>Here We Go Again
The downplay of a Senator Clinton&#039;s victory by bias and subjective reporting runs rampit. This report is evident of that statement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here We Go Again<br />
The downplay of a Senator Clinton's victory by bias and subjective reporting runs rampit. This report is evident of that statement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca - CA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470085</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca - CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470085</guid>
		<description>I am a democrat (white woman, over 50)...never voted any other way, because there was always a Dem available to trust and support.  If Hillary were to win the nomination, I will vote for &quot;Character&quot; first.... gotta give that one to McCain.  It is not over just becuase of Cali&#039;s vote.  I predict that many of these predominantly Red states with predominantly white voters who have voted overwhelmingly for Obama are anti-Hillary voters.  Like I said, when it is a choice between Hillary and John McCain, we would have to actually &quot;believe&quot; Hillary to support her...the only thing I believe about Hillary is that she is an extremely ambitious politician... not at all a champion of the people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a democrat (white woman, over 50)...never voted any other way, because there was always a Dem available to trust and support.  If Hillary were to win the nomination, I will vote for "Character" first.... gotta give that one to McCain.  It is not over just becuase of Cali's vote.  I predict that many of these predominantly Red states with predominantly white voters who have voted overwhelmingly for Obama are anti-Hillary voters.  Like I said, when it is a choice between Hillary and John McCain, we would have to actually "believe" Hillary to support her...the only thing I believe about Hillary is that she is an extremely ambitious politician... not at all a champion of the people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boogie</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470076</link>
		<dc:creator>Boogie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470076</guid>
		<description>PEOPLE...don&#039;t be fooled by these angry comments!!!
Most voters don&#039;t spend there time being influenced by hateful rhetoric on the web...they have real jobs and real opinions.

If Clinton wins the nom...a TINY percentage of sore losers will vote against her...the rest of the country is NOT that angry...only us nerds on the internet.

I&#039;m a dedicated Hillary supporter...but, I&#039;m a DEMOCRAT FIRST...both candidates will do pretty much the same thing in reality.

I think Obama is a arrogant, government demonizing, televangilist...but, I&#039;ll still vote for him if he wins...we HAVE TO SAVE OUR SUPREME COURT NOMINEES!!!
Take a chill and live to fight/vote another day.
Many people died so we could have this choice!
It&#039;s a privlege.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PEOPLE...don't be fooled by these angry comments!!!<br />
Most voters don't spend there time being influenced by hateful rhetoric on the web...they have real jobs and real opinions.</p>
<p>If Clinton wins the nom...a TINY percentage of sore losers will vote against her...the rest of the country is NOT that angry...only us nerds on the internet.</p>
<p>I'm a dedicated Hillary supporter...but, I'm a DEMOCRAT FIRST...both candidates will do pretty much the same thing in reality.</p>
<p>I think Obama is a arrogant, government demonizing, televangilist...but, I'll still vote for him if he wins...we HAVE TO SAVE OUR SUPREME COURT NOMINEES!!!<br />
Take a chill and live to fight/vote another day.<br />
Many people died so we could have this choice!<br />
It's a privlege.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SF, CA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470063</link>
		<dc:creator>SF, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470063</guid>
		<description>Zipo,

My parents are not illegal immigrants, and I ALWAYS vote Democrat - REGARDLESS of race, gender.

My brother in MN voted for Obama.

Stop your generalizing, and you&#039;ll be a much happier person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zipo,</p>
<p>My parents are not illegal immigrants, and I ALWAYS vote Democrat &#8211; REGARDLESS of race, gender.</p>
<p>My brother in MN voted for Obama.</p>
<p>Stop your generalizing, and you'll be a much happier person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470060</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470060</guid>
		<description>mike you got it right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mike you got it right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guy strohmeier</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470056</link>
		<dc:creator>guy strohmeier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470056</guid>
		<description>Ben, You can be sure that no Republicans I know will ever vote for Hillary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben, You can be sure that no Republicans I know will ever vote for Hillary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hillary</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470053</link>
		<dc:creator>Hillary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470053</guid>
		<description>Without looking at the final vote and comparing that to the electorate, you can&#039;t be sure whites really voted for Obama as much as they say.  People often lie so they don&#039;t appear racist.  Also, you can&#039;t take an exit poll of the early voters.  I believe the white vote was close, but I&#039;m skeptical that more whites voted for him than for Hillary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without looking at the final vote and comparing that to the electorate, you can't be sure whites really voted for Obama as much as they say.  People often lie so they don't appear racist.  Also, you can't take an exit poll of the early voters.  I believe the white vote was close, but I'm skeptical that more whites voted for him than for Hillary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470034</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 05:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470034</guid>
		<description>The only thing I hate from Barack Obama is that it looks like he just knows how to talk all the good things while everyone has already known that he can&#039;t even do a thing to whatever he wanted to say in his ad!.  All he wanted to do is &quot;I want this, I want that....blah...blah&quot; in his ad.  And I have to say that it looks like CNN is being angry with the results from California!.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only thing I hate from Barack Obama is that it looks like he just knows how to talk all the good things while everyone has already known that he can't even do a thing to whatever he wanted to say in his ad!.  All he wanted to do is "I want this, I want that....blah...blah" in his ad.  And I have to say that it looks like CNN is being angry with the results from California!.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470022</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 05:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-470022</guid>
		<description>Missouri was a near draw, with a negligible difference.  Barely goes one way or the other...look for it to tell you nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Missouri was a near draw, with a negligible difference.  Barely goes one way or the other...look for it to tell you nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnnaLee</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-469987</link>
		<dc:creator>AnnaLee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 05:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-469987</guid>
		<description>This title is ridiculus. Completely biased, misleading, how dare you call it &quot;reporting&quot;? The media&#039;s bias against Hillary is almost disgusting. What&#039;s their problem? Shame on you CNN!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This title is ridiculus. Completely biased, misleading, how dare you call it "reporting"? The media's bias against Hillary is almost disgusting. What's their problem? Shame on you CNN!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SF, CA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-469968</link>
		<dc:creator>SF, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 05:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-469968</guid>
		<description>Gary, get past your sexism.

Countries all over the world have elected women as their leaders.

There are 3 Latin American countries (which are seen as &quot;macho&quot; countries) who have women presidents.  Nicaragua has also had a woman president.

Our neighbors to the north had Kim Campell.

Our British friends had Margaret Thatcher for 12 years.

India had Indira Gandhi.

The Philippines has had Corazon Aquino, and they currently have a woman leader.

Should I go on?

Get out from under your rock.  You are GOP so, what can we expect?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary, get past your sexism.</p>
<p>Countries all over the world have elected women as their leaders.</p>
<p>There are 3 Latin American countries (which are seen as "macho" countries) who have women presidents.  Nicaragua has also had a woman president.</p>
<p>Our neighbors to the north had Kim Campell.</p>
<p>Our British friends had Margaret Thatcher for 12 years.</p>
<p>India had Indira Gandhi.</p>
<p>The Philippines has had Corazon Aquino, and they currently have a woman leader.</p>
<p>Should I go on?</p>
<p>Get out from under your rock.  You are GOP so, what can we expect?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sa</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-469965</link>
		<dc:creator>sa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 05:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-469965</guid>
		<description>This voter believes Bill Clinton was right &#039;on the money&#039;  when he pointed out, over and over, how this contest was about race.   STUPIDLY - about race.   The race issue is plastered everywhere we ALL look, folks!    Hasn&#039;t the last  seven and a half years of stonewalling and extreme partisanship taught us Democrats anything?

Just because I am a &quot;Hillary&quot; woman - does NOT mean I am against Barack.   Obama (from my perch) is eloquent and he DOES have Kennedy-esque visions.  Hillary and Barack each share MLK-esque visions ... or, as I&#039;d like to call them John Lennon &quot;Imagine&quot; visions.   These are the visions we Americans need to fix our eyes upon ... that we may all day &quot;live as one&quot;, free of any and all racial hatred.

Remember, &quot;Headlines&quot; sell ... they draw our attention and rile us internally making us lose our focus.   Remember - our focus should continue to be upon change, be it via Hillary or Barack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This voter believes Bill Clinton was right 'on the money'  when he pointed out, over and over, how this contest was about race.   STUPIDLY &#8211; about race.   The race issue is plastered everywhere we ALL look, folks!    Hasn't the last  seven and a half years of stonewalling and extreme partisanship taught us Democrats anything?</p>
<p>Just because I am a "Hillary" woman &#8211; does NOT mean I am against Barack.   Obama (from my perch) is eloquent and he DOES have Kennedy-esque visions.  Hillary and Barack each share MLK-esque visions ... or, as I'd like to call them John Lennon "Imagine" visions.   These are the visions we Americans need to fix our eyes upon ... that we may all day "live as one", free of any and all racial hatred.</p>
<p>Remember, "Headlines" sell ... they draw our attention and rile us internally making us lose our focus.   Remember &#8211; our focus should continue to be upon change, be it via Hillary or Barack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-469963</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 05:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-469963</guid>
		<description>Mike -- 

I wouldn&#039;t write Hillary off too soon for getting along with Republicans, if you knew anything about her, she has a very strong , successful record in the Senate for working across the aisle with Republicans and Democrats alike. Hillary is the one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike - </p>
<p>I wouldn't write Hillary off too soon for getting along with Republicans, if you knew anything about her, she has a very strong , successful record in the Senate for working across the aisle with Republicans and Democrats alike. Hillary is the one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joey</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-469950</link>
		<dc:creator>joey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 05:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-469950</guid>
		<description>Choosing a president because of cool factor could lead to disaster like Iraq war, Bay of Bigs, Cuban Missile crisis, etc.   We need a president who look at this jot with a serious ideas how to solve it.  Just find a cool way to say I bring change and nothing more.  I like JFK, the myth even though, he was before my time.   His speeches were very elegant and no hint of arrogance.   I like Obama too but his thin on specifics, and more rhetorics just do not cut it for me.   And when I listen to Senator Obama&#039;s speeches, I detect a hint of arrogance and smugness unlike JFK
Joey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Choosing a president because of cool factor could lead to disaster like Iraq war, Bay of Bigs, Cuban Missile crisis, etc.   We need a president who look at this jot with a serious ideas how to solve it.  Just find a cool way to say I bring change and nothing more.  I like JFK, the myth even though, he was before my time.   His speeches were very elegant and no hint of arrogance.   I like Obama too but his thin on specifics, and more rhetorics just do not cut it for me.   And when I listen to Senator Obama's speeches, I detect a hint of arrogance and smugness unlike JFK<br />
Joey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SF, CA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-469936</link>
		<dc:creator>SF, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 05:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-469936</guid>
		<description>Zipo, get a life!

I am Latino, and I have voted for a female African American candidate for posts in the past.

Your message of &quot;We need to deport all those illigal immigrants who are coming here to kill Americans&quot; shows your immense racial animosity toward Latinos and Asians.

I voted for a white woman, because she is the most experienced person to lead this country.  She doesn&#039;t vote &quot;present&quot;, she has ideas, and she&#039;s not only about blowing hot air.

SF, CA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zipo, get a life!</p>
<p>I am Latino, and I have voted for a female African American candidate for posts in the past.</p>
<p>Your message of "We need to deport all those illigal immigrants who are coming here to kill Americans" shows your immense racial animosity toward Latinos and Asians.</p>
<p>I voted for a white woman, because she is the most experienced person to lead this country.  She doesn't vote "present", she has ideas, and she's not only about blowing hot air.</p>
<p>SF, CA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-469925</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 05:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-469925</guid>
		<description>Biased, oh yes.  No sooner did cnn call Clinton the winner of California that the pundits were spinning that she&#039;ll have some problem related to dollars to fund her campaign.  Can you let us ride the high and not rush to go &quot;there&quot;?  If it was Obama who they were discussing we&#039;d hear about how great and filled his pockets are.

I have no worries about her funding-- all interested parties, lets back her,  go to HillaryClinton.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Biased, oh yes.  No sooner did cnn call Clinton the winner of California that the pundits were spinning that she'll have some problem related to dollars to fund her campaign.  Can you let us ride the high and not rush to go "there"?  If it was Obama who they were discussing we'd hear about how great and filled his pockets are.</p>
<p>I have no worries about her funding&#8211; all interested parties, lets back her,  go to HillaryClinton.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isabelle</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-469919</link>
		<dc:creator>Isabelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 05:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-469919</guid>
		<description>I hope Hillary wins the nomination and chooses Obama as VP.  In 8 years he will win and be really ready.  I haven&#039;t heard him say much of anything specific and John McCain and the republicans will tear him a new one I&#039;m afraid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope Hillary wins the nomination and chooses Obama as VP.  In 8 years he will win and be really ready.  I haven't heard him say much of anything specific and John McCain and the republicans will tear him a new one I'm afraid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BOB</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-469905</link>
		<dc:creator>BOB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 05:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-469905</guid>
		<description>Republicans would vote for Hillary , in the ceneral election, but not fo for , the kid on the block . For the republicans will, dump all his dirty laundry out for the public to sort threw. May find a loose check , from Farrakhan. And many more from the great state of Ill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans would vote for Hillary , in the ceneral election, but not fo for , the kid on the block . For the republicans will, dump all his dirty laundry out for the public to sort threw. May find a loose check , from Farrakhan. And many more from the great state of Ill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zina</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-469894</link>
		<dc:creator>Zina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 05:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-469894</guid>
		<description>Obama did wonderfully tonight!!  He did much MORE than was expected!  Missouri was just called for him!

I&#039;m so proud to have caucused for this man!

Obama &#039;08</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama did wonderfully tonight!!  He did much MORE than was expected!  Missouri was just called for him!</p>
<p>I'm so proud to have caucused for this man!</p>
<p>Obama '08</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isabelle</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-469879</link>
		<dc:creator>Isabelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 05:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-469879</guid>
		<description>Obama won states that WON&#039;T vote democrat in November...but the media doesn&#039;t mention that.  Vote for Hillary..stick it to the man!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama won states that WON'T vote democrat in November...but the media doesn't mention that.  Vote for Hillary..stick it to the man!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve, NYC, NY</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-469853</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve, NYC, NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 05:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-469853</guid>
		<description>People need to read this and maybe do some of their own investigation.  Listen to Obama during the DEBATE, NOT the speeches.  His speeches are prewritten and nothing more than motivational.  But you see in his debate how he never answers the tough questions.

 	 February 5, 2008 11:58 pm ET

One of the comments here was saying Obama was just so holy because he doesn&#039;t deal with lobbyists. Was that commentator aware that the silver tongued serpent of Hyde Park makes extensive use of them as campaign advisors? He refuses to discuss that with the press–but then again, he stiff-arms the press…even those segments of the press that fawn all over him. He is not the Christ-like figure some here are making him out to be. He&#039;s as phony as most other politicians–he just fools you because he strings words together well. Maybe he&#039;ll get the nomination, and maybe he&#039;ll get elected in November, but all you &quot;change&quot; folks better remember one crucial point….be very careful in making requests, because in the end, you will get what you asked for, but not in the way YOU intended….I smell Jimmy Carter more than I smell Bobby Kennedy (BTW–happen to notice who Bobby Kennedy&#039;s offspring decided to endorse…just a thought).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People need to read this and maybe do some of their own investigation.  Listen to Obama during the DEBATE, NOT the speeches.  His speeches are prewritten and nothing more than motivational.  But you see in his debate how he never answers the tough questions.</p>
<p> 	 February 5, 2008 11:58 pm ET</p>
<p>One of the comments here was saying Obama was just so holy because he doesn't deal with lobbyists. Was that commentator aware that the silver tongued serpent of Hyde Park makes extensive use of them as campaign advisors? He refuses to discuss that with the press–but then again, he stiff-arms the press…even those segments of the press that fawn all over him. He is not the Christ-like figure some here are making him out to be. He's as phony as most other politicians–he just fools you because he strings words together well. Maybe he'll get the nomination, and maybe he'll get elected in November, but all you "change" folks better remember one crucial point….be very careful in making requests, because in the end, you will get what you asked for, but not in the way YOU intended….I smell Jimmy Carter more than I smell Bobby Kennedy (BTW–happen to notice who Bobby Kennedy's offspring decided to endorse…just a thought).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-469845</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 05:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-469845</guid>
		<description>The thing that bothers me about Hillary is that people seem to either love her or hate her.  That will not bode well in the general election.  I seriously doubt that she can attract independents like she does the Democratic base, and she certainly will not pull many Republican votes.  If we want a Democrat in the White House, Obama is the only sure winner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing that bothers me about Hillary is that people seem to either love her or hate her.  That will not bode well in the general election.  I seriously doubt that she can attract independents like she does the Democratic base, and she certainly will not pull many Republican votes.  If we want a Democrat in the White House, Obama is the only sure winner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just My 2 Cents</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-469818</link>
		<dc:creator>Just My 2 Cents</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 05:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-469818</guid>
		<description>Only Ignorant Democrats would give their vote to a Republican.  I am an Obama supporter and if he is not the nominee, I will NOT VOTE FOR ANY REPUBLICAN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only Ignorant Democrats would give their vote to a Republican.  I am an Obama supporter and if he is not the nominee, I will NOT VOTE FOR ANY REPUBLICAN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: latino</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-469815</link>
		<dc:creator>latino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 05:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-469815</guid>
		<description>if america elect black prezident they are going to have cituation like in kenia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if america elect black prezident they are going to have cituation like in kenia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-469779</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 05:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-469779</guid>
		<description>Any Democrat who says they vote Republican if Hillary is the candidate is guilty of making her unelectable.  If your party majority wants her, then you should accept the majority rule of vote, and give the White House to the Dems.  The House and Senate NEED a Democratic White House to get things done in this country!!

Don&#039;t be too sure that Republicans won&#039;t vote for Hillary after what their party did to America the last 8 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any Democrat who says they vote Republican if Hillary is the candidate is guilty of making her unelectable.  If your party majority wants her, then you should accept the majority rule of vote, and give the White House to the Dems.  The House and Senate NEED a Democratic White House to get things done in this country!!</p>
<p>Don't be too sure that Republicans won't vote for Hillary after what their party did to America the last 8 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GARY</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-469778</link>
		<dc:creator>GARY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 05:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-469778</guid>
		<description>WE ALREADY HAD CLINTON IN OFFICE, SO WHY WOULD WE WANT HER AGAIN?  I&#039;M NOT READY FOR A WOMEN PRESIDENT, ESPECIALLY A CLINTON.  I&#039;M A REPUBLICAN, BUT I WILL ADMIT THAT I DO LIKE OBAMA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WE ALREADY HAD CLINTON IN OFFICE, SO WHY WOULD WE WANT HER AGAIN?  I'M NOT READY FOR A WOMEN PRESIDENT, ESPECIALLY A CLINTON.  I'M A REPUBLICAN, BUT I WILL ADMIT THAT I DO LIKE OBAMA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chelsea</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-469775</link>
		<dc:creator>chelsea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 05:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/05/schneider-clinton-losing-among-whites-and-blacks-in-california/#comment-469775</guid>
		<description>can someone please tell me why everyone likes obama so much other than the fact that he&#039;s for change (they&#039;re all for change) or the fact that they&#039;re just jumping on the bandwagon?

go asians and latinos! right on!

rock on, hil, rock on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can someone please tell me why everyone likes obama so much other than the fact that he's for change (they're all for change) or the fact that they're just jumping on the bandwagon?</p>
<p>go asians and latinos! right on!</p>
<p>rock on, hil, rock on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
