<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Clinton, McCain may have won California</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/</link>
	<description>All politics, all the time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:07:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Carmen Arizona African</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-480896</link>
		<dc:creator>Carmen Arizona African</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 09:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-480896</guid>
		<description>carmen   February 6, 2008 10:46 am ET

I live in Arizona, and I am also an African-American woman. I don&#039;t subscribe to the ideas or notions that Black and Latinos don&#039;t get along in general. We have no issues with Black and Latinos in Arizona. As an African-American, I cannot understand why any Latino would have a problem voting for another person of another minority. When I drive down the street and see signs for immigration reform, and letters to send &quot;them back to Mexico,&quot; there is not one Black person ever in the group. Nor is it African Americans calling for the closing of the borders, and suggesting that we round &quot;these people up,&quot; or are currently deporting them seperating them from their families. I think it is time for the Latino community to wake up and realize that we may not have everything in common, but we&#039;ve been where you have been, and perhaps……..we may be your stongest ally. Again we find a group of people looking at race, instead of the facts. It is White American that is trying to remove you from the United States, not the rest of us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>carmen   February 6, 2008 10:46 am ET</p>
<p>I live in Arizona, and I am also an African-American woman. I don't subscribe to the ideas or notions that Black and Latinos don't get along in general. We have no issues with Black and Latinos in Arizona. As an African-American, I cannot understand why any Latino would have a problem voting for another person of another minority. When I drive down the street and see signs for immigration reform, and letters to send "them back to Mexico," there is not one Black person ever in the group. Nor is it African Americans calling for the closing of the borders, and suggesting that we round "these people up," or are currently deporting them seperating them from their families. I think it is time for the Latino community to wake up and realize that we may not have everything in common, but we've been where you have been, and perhaps……..we may be your stongest ally. Again we find a group of people looking at race, instead of the facts. It is White American that is trying to remove you from the United States, not the rest of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joanne</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-477798</link>
		<dc:creator>Joanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 00:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-477798</guid>
		<description>I too have been disappointed by CNN election coverage; it seems so biased against Clinton, and so pro-Obama.  I think both candidates are great, however personnaly believe Hillary is more qualified.  That said, the consistent negative coverage of Clinton&#039;s wins (they aren&#039;t &#039;really&#039; wins) by CNN, combined with thier jubilant hype of Obama, has made me switch to primarily watching MSNBC coverage.  What really struck me Tuesday was how the media (with CNN leading the bandwagon) creating this overwhelming Obama &#039;momentum&#039;, and the fact that the voting public didn&#039;t take thier lead---voters made thier own decisions without the &#039;help&#039; of the obviously flawed television news coverage.  Would they do this to a man???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too have been disappointed by CNN election coverage; it seems so biased against Clinton, and so pro-Obama.  I think both candidates are great, however personnaly believe Hillary is more qualified.  That said, the consistent negative coverage of Clinton's wins (they aren't 'really' wins) by CNN, combined with thier jubilant hype of Obama, has made me switch to primarily watching MSNBC coverage.  What really struck me Tuesday was how the media (with CNN leading the bandwagon) creating this overwhelming Obama 'momentum', and the fact that the voting public didn't take thier lead-voters made thier own decisions without the 'help' of the obviously flawed television news coverage.  Would they do this to a man???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yazoo</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-476919</link>
		<dc:creator>yazoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 22:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-476919</guid>
		<description>Obama is a uniter not a divider.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is a uniter not a divider.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fairness</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-476871</link>
		<dc:creator>Fairness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 22:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-476871</guid>
		<description>Your editorial ethics stink. I don&#039;t care if you post this or not. I&#039;m satisfied knowing tht you have read it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your editorial ethics stink. I don't care if you post this or not. I'm satisfied knowing tht you have read it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-476853</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 22:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-476853</guid>
		<description>80+ percent blacks voting for Obama. Ummmmm ... now why is no one calling that racism?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>80+ percent blacks voting for Obama. Ummmmm ... now why is no one calling that racism?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barb miller</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-476768</link>
		<dc:creator>Barb miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-476768</guid>
		<description>keep going Hillary, you may not always be right in every decision, but having the experience you have, is what the country needs. To me, I think your the best choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>keep going Hillary, you may not always be right in every decision, but having the experience you have, is what the country needs. To me, I think your the best choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-476702</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-476702</guid>
		<description>Wow,

Didn&#039;t know the Latinos and Asians were so racist in America...scarey!!!  That&#039;s just what this country doesn&#039;t need anymore of ...divisions...Even before this woman can get into office, she and her husband are planting more divisions!!!

Time for change...

Thank God, everyone in this great nation is not racist...and thank God the population of Latinos that can vote legally are so small.  America is a great land though.  The only land on earth that would allow noncitizens to have such a crucial voice in our country.  And to &quot;Jesse Diaz&quot;, the blacks in Dallas are not running for office, Hillary is...It&#039;s funny that you seem to believe that she is the answer to the problems of Latinos.  For the record, the country (black or white) doesn&#039;t have a problem with Latinos, just ones that are here illegally.

Can&#039;t wait till Americans see what Hillary and Bill (Slick Willie) Clinton are doing, and unite against it!

YES WE CAN!
OBAMA &#039;08</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow,</p>
<p>Didn't know the Latinos and Asians were so racist in America...scarey!!!  That's just what this country doesn't need anymore of ...divisions...Even before this woman can get into office, she and her husband are planting more divisions!!!</p>
<p>Time for change...</p>
<p>Thank God, everyone in this great nation is not racist...and thank God the population of Latinos that can vote legally are so small.  America is a great land though.  The only land on earth that would allow noncitizens to have such a crucial voice in our country.  And to "Jesse Diaz", the blacks in Dallas are not running for office, Hillary is...It's funny that you seem to believe that she is the answer to the problems of Latinos.  For the record, the country (black or white) doesn't have a problem with Latinos, just ones that are here illegally.</p>
<p>Can't wait till Americans see what Hillary and Bill (Slick Willie) Clinton are doing, and unite against it!</p>
<p>YES WE CAN!<br />
OBAMA '08</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca - CA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-476469</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca - CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-476469</guid>
		<description>STEPHEN.... You&#039;ve got to be kidding me....you viewed a photo taken of Mr Obama in which it wasn&#039;t even clear whether or not he might be talking to someone else at the time, so didn&#039;t immediately drop another conversation to focus his attention on &quot;her&quot;....and that is the reason for the strong Latino vote for Hillary.  Sorry, I don&#039;t buy that......... I have Latino colleagues and they don&#039;t buy that either....they&#039;re too smart for that.  With that logic, should I then choose to vote for Mr Obama, because he was a gentleman and pulled out her chair for her?  Please... vote your choice, but please base your choice on more than that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>STEPHEN.... You've got to be kidding me....you viewed a photo taken of Mr Obama in which it wasn't even clear whether or not he might be talking to someone else at the time, so didn't immediately drop another conversation to focus his attention on "her"....and that is the reason for the strong Latino vote for Hillary.  Sorry, I don't buy that......... I have Latino colleagues and they don't buy that either....they're too smart for that.  With that logic, should I then choose to vote for Mr Obama, because he was a gentleman and pulled out her chair for her?  Please... vote your choice, but please base your choice on more than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-476464</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-476464</guid>
		<description>Hey guys let us talk constructively here and stop all these racial bigotry and hatred.....It does not matter who wins the democratic nomination, democrats will have to come together to win in November......Let us not sound like experience has nothing to do with been a president. I think both candidate are great people and they deserve some admiration no matter who you support or will vote for.

by the way, i am an independent voting Hillary because i just feel she has the best shot and most qualified. Yeah, a friend of mine talked about her vote for the war!!! common people, that was a tough call at that time and coming from New york, you will see how difficult it would have been to vote against the war. The American people supported the war from start.....now that things have gone south, it quite easy to distance ourself from it. lets come together and solve it that is moving forward. As for Obama, listen guys, he wasn&#039;t even in the Senate then when the votes were cast, so how would you know for sure how he would have voted!!!!! think about it....quite easy to say i kick against the war....you did not vote against it....so i am kind of amazed when people say he never supported the war????  Anyway, for me, whoever the democratic nominee turns out to be, that is who i am voting for in the general election. i just can&#039;t stand the republicans this coming year.

Please note, there is nothing wrong is having Bush-Clinton-Bush ??? Clinton if she is the best candidate.....don&#039;t vote wrongly because you just want to break that dynasty, that will be a dump idea from my point of view. That is what led us into having George Bush in office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys let us talk constructively here and stop all these racial bigotry and hatred.....It does not matter who wins the democratic nomination, democrats will have to come together to win in November......Let us not sound like experience has nothing to do with been a president. I think both candidate are great people and they deserve some admiration no matter who you support or will vote for.</p>
<p>by the way, i am an independent voting Hillary because i just feel she has the best shot and most qualified. Yeah, a friend of mine talked about her vote for the war!!! common people, that was a tough call at that time and coming from New york, you will see how difficult it would have been to vote against the war. The American people supported the war from start.....now that things have gone south, it quite easy to distance ourself from it. lets come together and solve it that is moving forward. As for Obama, listen guys, he wasn't even in the Senate then when the votes were cast, so how would you know for sure how he would have voted!!!!! think about it....quite easy to say i kick against the war....you did not vote against it....so i am kind of amazed when people say he never supported the war????  Anyway, for me, whoever the democratic nominee turns out to be, that is who i am voting for in the general election. i just can't stand the republicans this coming year.</p>
<p>Please note, there is nothing wrong is having Bush-Clinton-Bush ??? Clinton if she is the best candidate.....don't vote wrongly because you just want to break that dynasty, that will be a dump idea from my point of view. That is what led us into having George Bush in office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sinnester1</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-476410</link>
		<dc:creator>sinnester1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-476410</guid>
		<description>kudos to stephanie,all you obama supporters should read her statements and try to respond with an educated response</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kudos to stephanie,all you obama supporters should read her statements and try to respond with an educated response</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-476262</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-476262</guid>
		<description>Obama keep talking about Hillary&#039;s Iraq vote. Well, he would have most likely vOTED PRESENT. Part of the change hoped for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama keep talking about Hillary's Iraq vote. Well, he would have most likely vOTED PRESENT. Part of the change hoped for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre - Believer.</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-476260</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre - Believer.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-476260</guid>
		<description>Cheryl,

You are just a little too self-serving in your beliefs for ANYONE to take your comments seriously.  Whatever sense of Clinton entitlement that you got stuck in your mind that suggests to you that Obama is &quot;lucky to even sit next to Hillary during the debates&quot;  must be purged from your thinking and never expressed again.  It makes you look like an idiot.  Even Hilary has learned to respect the genius in the Obama campaign (movement).  They are neck and neck in delegate votes and that scares many that it is really a possibility (likeleyhood) that Obama will be the Dem nominee.  That&#039;s the November reality that is striking fear into the hearts of so many, yourself included!

Give yourself the fix you need -- Vote Obama!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheryl,</p>
<p>You are just a little too self-serving in your beliefs for ANYONE to take your comments seriously.  Whatever sense of Clinton entitlement that you got stuck in your mind that suggests to you that Obama is "lucky to even sit next to Hillary during the debates"  must be purged from your thinking and never expressed again.  It makes you look like an idiot.  Even Hilary has learned to respect the genius in the Obama campaign (movement).  They are neck and neck in delegate votes and that scares many that it is really a possibility (likeleyhood) that Obama will be the Dem nominee.  That's the November reality that is striking fear into the hearts of so many, yourself included!</p>
<p>Give yourself the fix you need - Vote Obama!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ANGEL</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-476257</link>
		<dc:creator>ANGEL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-476257</guid>
		<description>YOU ARE RIGHT CHERYL , I AM WITH YOU</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YOU ARE RIGHT CHERYL , I AM WITH YOU</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hsolinap</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-476229</link>
		<dc:creator>hsolinap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-476229</guid>
		<description>GO  HILLARY.................

WE ARE ON YOUR SIDE WHATEVER OTHERS WILL  SAY ABOUT YOU. ESP. THOSE PEOPLE IN MSNBC, FOXNEWS, CHANNEL TWO ,CHANNELS  41, 29,5
9, AND OTHER NEWSPAPERS WHOSE AGAINST. YOU. 

THEY ARE ALL PLASTIC PEOPLE.

GOD BLESS YOU.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GO  HILLARY.................</p>
<p>WE ARE ON YOUR SIDE WHATEVER OTHERS WILL  SAY ABOUT YOU. ESP. THOSE PEOPLE IN MSNBC, FOXNEWS, CHANNEL TWO ,CHANNELS  41, 29,5<br />
9, AND OTHER NEWSPAPERS WHOSE AGAINST. YOU. </p>
<p>THEY ARE ALL PLASTIC PEOPLE.</p>
<p>GOD BLESS YOU.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ratgurl</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-476219</link>
		<dc:creator>Ratgurl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-476219</guid>
		<description>A significant number of people in California have been disenfranchised by the recent Primary elections by only being able to cast “provisional” ballots, which (if my information is correct) are not actually counted.  This happened to a friend of mine who drove me to the registrar of voters because my polling place was not open at 7am when I arrived there to vote.   He figured as long as he was taking me to the registrar, he’d cast his ballot there as well.  It was not until he checked his ballot receipt the next day that he noticed, in tiny letters, the word “provisional” printed on it.  They did not notify him that if he voted at the registrar’s office instead of his polling place that his vote would be provisional, and thus not counted.

In addition to this first-hand experience, I am hearing stories about college students – a very large percentage of them – having to vote provisionally due to some error with the registrar’s office. It is imperative in this day and age that our civil liberties not be trampled on and that our votes, ALL of our votes, are counted legitimately and properly.  That is, after all, what being American is about.  Those people who took the time out of their day to contribute what they rightfully can and should to the betterment of this nation should not be denied their voice.  If you have the resources, I beg you to please investigate these events, and expose any possible fraud that may have been perpetrated on these voters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A significant number of people in California have been disenfranchised by the recent Primary elections by only being able to cast “provisional” ballots, which (if my information is correct) are not actually counted.  This happened to a friend of mine who drove me to the registrar of voters because my polling place was not open at 7am when I arrived there to vote.   He figured as long as he was taking me to the registrar, he’d cast his ballot there as well.  It was not until he checked his ballot receipt the next day that he noticed, in tiny letters, the word “provisional” printed on it.  They did not notify him that if he voted at the registrar’s office instead of his polling place that his vote would be provisional, and thus not counted.</p>
<p>In addition to this first-hand experience, I am hearing stories about college students – a very large percentage of them – having to vote provisionally due to some error with the registrar’s office. It is imperative in this day and age that our civil liberties not be trampled on and that our votes, ALL of our votes, are counted legitimately and properly.  That is, after all, what being American is about.  Those people who took the time out of their day to contribute what they rightfully can and should to the betterment of this nation should not be denied their voice.  If you have the resources, I beg you to please investigate these events, and expose any possible fraud that may have been perpetrated on these voters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rey</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-476183</link>
		<dc:creator>Rey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-476183</guid>
		<description>Hey Rick,Maryland.... if the world considers the U.S. idiots it&#039;s probably due to the fact the people like yourself can&#039;t spell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Rick,Maryland.... if the world considers the U.S. idiots it's probably due to the fact the people like yourself can't spell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: open your eyes - FL</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-476152</link>
		<dc:creator>open your eyes - FL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-476152</guid>
		<description>artseafartsea - 

We&#039;re all for having a woman president... just not one as corrupt, superficial and feminist as Hillary.  Throw in philandering, side-dealing Slick Willy again and it makes for a sickening combination that shouldn&#039;t be in politics anywhere... maybe Kazakhstan... if you catch that reference.    

Open your mind.  It&#039;s obviously slammed shut.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>artseafartsea &#8211; </p>
<p>We're all for having a woman president... just not one as corrupt, superficial and feminist as Hillary.  Throw in philandering, side-dealing Slick Willy again and it makes for a sickening combination that shouldn't be in politics anywhere... maybe Kazakhstan... if you catch that reference.    </p>
<p>Open your mind.  It's obviously slammed shut.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale London UK</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-476024</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale London UK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-476024</guid>
		<description>Europe is watching with interest.
The US often does itself a huge disservce internationally. Ever thought about the principles behind the bully boy being ganged up on?
Lots of us outside the US would love to see the female touch and a more international approach. Lets face it, women who make it to the top in politics and business allost always had to be better to get there!
Europe for Hillary!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Europe is watching with interest.<br />
The US often does itself a huge disservce internationally. Ever thought about the principles behind the bully boy being ganged up on?<br />
Lots of us outside the US would love to see the female touch and a more international approach. Lets face it, women who make it to the top in politics and business allost always had to be better to get there!<br />
Europe for Hillary!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victoria Hogan</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-475931</link>
		<dc:creator>Victoria Hogan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-475931</guid>
		<description>The important factor in the California result was the early voting.  A large chunk of voters voted by mail and that process began weeks ago.  The early voters didn&#039;t know Edwards would be dropping out, didn&#039;t know Kennedy or Shriver would endorse, and could not have been influenced by any of the other developments that created a surge for Obama in the days just prior to the election.

The votes may not be fully counted in California until Friday so the gap will continue to narrow a bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The important factor in the California result was the early voting.  A large chunk of voters voted by mail and that process began weeks ago.  The early voters didn't know Edwards would be dropping out, didn't know Kennedy or Shriver would endorse, and could not have been influenced by any of the other developments that created a surge for Obama in the days just prior to the election.</p>
<p>The votes may not be fully counted in California until Friday so the gap will continue to narrow a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-475883</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-475883</guid>
		<description>Fact 1. I would vote for Obama. Fact 2. The next president will be a Democrat. Fact 3. A majority of Americans will not elect a black person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fact 1. I would vote for Obama. Fact 2. The next president will be a Democrat. Fact 3. A majority of Americans will not elect a black person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F M</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-475784</link>
		<dc:creator>F M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-475784</guid>
		<description>Rick should not be telling folks about &quot;who thinks&quot; he can barely spell....Hillary&#039;s name......Talk about someone who really was left behind by G W.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick should not be telling folks about "who thinks" he can barely spell....Hillary's name......Talk about someone who really was left behind by G W.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marc</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-475774</link>
		<dc:creator>marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-475774</guid>
		<description>Anyone who thinks Obama is going to win Washington State isn&#039;t from Washington State.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who thinks Obama is going to win Washington State isn't from Washington State.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: King, GA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-475616</link>
		<dc:creator>King, GA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-475616</guid>
		<description>CNN, now I know why you are not posting my comment. However, I don&#039;t stop telling you that you are BIASED. It is the truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNN, now I know why you are not posting my comment. However, I don't stop telling you that you are BIASED. It is the truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TellItLikeItIs</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-475527</link>
		<dc:creator>TellItLikeItIs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-475527</guid>
		<description>Brandy, NJ   February 6, 2008 7:58 am ET


Blacks have traditionally been supportive of clinton, except of course it appears in the case if a black is in the running, then their vote seems to sway based on race.

While whites are more evenly split as awhole, racially. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So if a white person votes for a black person then they&#039;re voting by choice and if a black person is voting for the best candidate of their choice who happens to be black then it&#039;s called voting by race? Is it possible that blacks are voting for the person that they think is the &quot;BEST&quot; choice who just happens to be black? You&#039;re so ignorant and biggoted that you don&#039;t even know it. Just because Hillary is not everyone&#039;s favorite like yours doesn&#039;t mean there&#039;s an agenda behind the way they vote. Maybe it&#039;s them who are the smart ones and not you. 

Obama supports and cares more about women&#039;s rights then Hillary does(look it up) and yet the majority of women still support Hillary? I don&#039;t see anyone making that an issue, do you? Who cares, because there are women voting for Obama and there are blacks who are voting for Hillary. You&#039;re definitely one who either doesn&#039;t understand change or want change to happen. You&#039;re the problem not the solution to what&#039;s going on in this country and the world around us.

I haven&#039;t heard about women being the majority of Hillary&#039;s support nearly as much as I have about blacks voting for Obama. Does it matter that Obama has won the white vote in California and Connecticut and a bunch of purely white middle states by landslides? His voting support transcends race which is more proof that he upholds his message. This is what people are talking about when they say that Hillary&#039;s supporters are ignorant and dumb. You prove that point way too easy. Just another example why Obama is winning with the educated voters. Wow.



OBAMA &#039;08</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brandy, NJ   February 6, 2008 7:58 am ET</p>
<p>Blacks have traditionally been supportive of clinton, except of course it appears in the case if a black is in the running, then their vote seems to sway based on race.</p>
<p>While whites are more evenly split as awhole, racially. </p>
<p>--------------------------------------</p>
<p>So if a white person votes for a black person then they're voting by choice and if a black person is voting for the best candidate of their choice who happens to be black then it's called voting by race? Is it possible that blacks are voting for the person that they think is the "BEST" choice who just happens to be black? You're so ignorant and biggoted that you don't even know it. Just because Hillary is not everyone's favorite like yours doesn't mean there's an agenda behind the way they vote. Maybe it's them who are the smart ones and not you. </p>
<p>Obama supports and cares more about women's rights then Hillary does(look it up) and yet the majority of women still support Hillary? I don't see anyone making that an issue, do you? Who cares, because there are women voting for Obama and there are blacks who are voting for Hillary. You're definitely one who either doesn't understand change or want change to happen. You're the problem not the solution to what's going on in this country and the world around us.</p>
<p>I haven't heard about women being the majority of Hillary's support nearly as much as I have about blacks voting for Obama. Does it matter that Obama has won the white vote in California and Connecticut and a bunch of purely white middle states by landslides? His voting support transcends race which is more proof that he upholds his message. This is what people are talking about when they say that Hillary's supporters are ignorant and dumb. You prove that point way too easy. Just another example why Obama is winning with the educated voters. Wow.</p>
<p>OBAMA '08</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mort72</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-475491</link>
		<dc:creator>mort72</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-475491</guid>
		<description>ANY OF THOSE COMPLAINING ABOUT CNN&#039;S COVERAGE OF THE VOTING LAST NIGHT REGARDING HILLARY, SURELY HADEN&#039;T WATCHED MSNBC.THEY SURELY WERE WATCHING AN ELECTION ON MARS.

CNN IN COMPARISON,WAS LIKE HEARING WALTER CRONKITE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ANY OF THOSE COMPLAINING ABOUT CNN'S COVERAGE OF THE VOTING LAST NIGHT REGARDING HILLARY, SURELY HADEN'T WATCHED MSNBC.THEY SURELY WERE WATCHING AN ELECTION ON MARS.</p>
<p>CNN IN COMPARISON,WAS LIKE HEARING WALTER CRONKITE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-475489</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-475489</guid>
		<description>Obama claims that he will be the uniter. The democrat party has never been so divided and this all happened because of him. If Obama wins, we will have another Bush. Promise one thing and do the total opposite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama claims that he will be the uniter. The democrat party has never been so divided and this all happened because of him. If Obama wins, we will have another Bush. Promise one thing and do the total opposite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann Independent Media,PA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-475412</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann Independent Media,PA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-475412</guid>
		<description>WOW Do you notice the trend of concern voters that notice the bias and subjective media coverage from most of the major networks? I bet if you email the CEO&#039;s offices about your concerns, there would be some attention brought to this issue. If you are not satisfied, write your congresman or senator and demmand fair and objective media reporting for ALL candidates especially if these networks are recieving public funds through the government.
With that said...
I agree...even AGAINSTS ALL ODDS and THE MEDIA MACHINE...THE CLINTON MACHINE P R E V A I L S ! ! ! ! ! !
Sneator Obama should have done much better but couldn&#039;t deliver...especially with the endorsements that the media sensationalized and the downplaying of Senator Clintin&#039;s progress(even during all the election results).  Gotta hand it to Senator Clinton...she earned every vote and every state she won. I hope Senator Obama finds his true political worth without the media gloryfying him so he can have a true sense on his ability to run a campaign.
I feel the exit polls should ask the questions...Did the media have a part in your decision? Did you think the media overall provide fair and objective coverage to all the candidates, if not  who do you think the media favored?
In the past 24 hours my posts have not been included in blogs because I asked these questions...So much for fair and objective media coverage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW Do you notice the trend of concern voters that notice the bias and subjective media coverage from most of the major networks? I bet if you email the CEO's offices about your concerns, there would be some attention brought to this issue. If you are not satisfied, write your congresman or senator and demmand fair and objective media reporting for ALL candidates especially if these networks are recieving public funds through the government.<br />
With that said...<br />
I agree...even AGAINSTS ALL ODDS and THE MEDIA MACHINE...THE CLINTON MACHINE P R E V A I L S ! ! ! ! ! !<br />
Sneator Obama should have done much better but couldn't deliver...especially with the endorsements that the media sensationalized and the downplaying of Senator Clintin's progress(even during all the election results).  Gotta hand it to Senator Clinton...she earned every vote and every state she won. I hope Senator Obama finds his true political worth without the media gloryfying him so he can have a true sense on his ability to run a campaign.<br />
I feel the exit polls should ask the questions...Did the media have a part in your decision? Did you think the media overall provide fair and objective coverage to all the candidates, if not  who do you think the media favored?<br />
In the past 24 hours my posts have not been included in blogs because I asked these questions...So much for fair and objective media coverage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: King</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-475396</link>
		<dc:creator>King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-475396</guid>
		<description>Clueless haters! Most of you even don&#039;t know why you hate this intelligent woman.  Alas! Are you a bunch of sexists? I&#039;m a man voting for her because of her excellent issues. She will be one of the best leaders. She will prove it for you...just wait and see. Go Hillary!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clueless haters! Most of you even don't know why you hate this intelligent woman.  Alas! Are you a bunch of sexists? I'm a man voting for her because of her excellent issues. She will be one of the best leaders. She will prove it for you...just wait and see. Go Hillary!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Give me a Break!</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-475302</link>
		<dc:creator>Give me a Break!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-475302</guid>
		<description>What the heck?  Someone is comparing Obama to Hitler?  Good grief!  And for the record, Hitler&#039;s book wasn&#039;t called My Struggle.  This is possibly the most absurd thing I&#039;ve ever heard, next to people placing a vote for Hillary Clinton - who is more like a communist than a democrat.  When someone starts saying that everyone should have the same benefits, be it the guy taking orders at McDonalds or the guy in the corner office, you have to see the remark for what it is - communist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the heck?  Someone is comparing Obama to Hitler?  Good grief!  And for the record, Hitler's book wasn't called My Struggle.  This is possibly the most absurd thing I've ever heard, next to people placing a vote for Hillary Clinton &#8211; who is more like a communist than a democrat.  When someone starts saying that everyone should have the same benefits, be it the guy taking orders at McDonalds or the guy in the corner office, you have to see the remark for what it is &#8211; communist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve   Blaine Washington</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-475273</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve   Blaine Washington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-475273</guid>
		<description>In California you can not ask someone if their are a citizen when registering. They even have registers that speak Spanish for this very purpose. Try going to a McDonalds and ask for a large order of French fryes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In California you can not ask someone if their are a citizen when registering. They even have registers that speak Spanish for this very purpose. Try going to a McDonalds and ask for a large order of French fryes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: georgia dem</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-475266</link>
		<dc:creator>georgia dem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-475266</guid>
		<description>GO HILLARY!!
why is  it that if I vote for Hillary I am stuck in the past
that makes as much since as George Bush saying if I am against the war
I don&#039;t love America
********************************
good grief
I made my decision by watching ALL the debates 
***************************************************
and I picked  who I think will be the best president
I do not let the likes of OPRAH
or Ted Kennedy or John Kerry OR CNN
tell me who to vote for
I am a grown woman and a business owner
I have a brain and I know how to make a decision
this is for the PRESIDENT
NOT AMERICAN IDOL
OMABA is NOT the one!!
they say if you get to know Obama you will want to vote for him
well I got to know him and I voted for Hillary!!
************************************************</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GO HILLARY!!<br />
why is  it that if I vote for Hillary I am stuck in the past<br />
that makes as much since as George Bush saying if I am against the war<br />
I don't love America<br />
********************************<br />
good grief<br />
I made my decision by watching ALL the debates<br />
***************************************************<br />
and I picked  who I think will be the best president<br />
I do not let the likes of OPRAH<br />
or Ted Kennedy or John Kerry OR CNN<br />
tell me who to vote for<br />
I am a grown woman and a business owner<br />
I have a brain and I know how to make a decision<br />
this is for the PRESIDENT<br />
NOT AMERICAN IDOL<br />
OMABA is NOT the one!!<br />
they say if you get to know Obama you will want to vote for him<br />
well I got to know him and I voted for Hillary!!<br />
************************************************</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Naida</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-475260</link>
		<dc:creator>Naida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-475260</guid>
		<description>Boy D, you are right about CNN being excited only when OBAMA won a vote-How great that was_Nothing Hillary did was good enough for CNN.Excude Lou Dobbs who was interested in ALL.
I watch them all the time.Am so dishearted to find them so one sided.
GO HILLARY.
Bend,Oregon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boy D, you are right about CNN being excited only when OBAMA won a vote-How great that was_Nothing Hillary did was good enough for CNN.Excude Lou Dobbs who was interested in ALL.<br />
I watch them all the time.Am so dishearted to find them so one sided.<br />
GO HILLARY.<br />
Bend,Oregon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-475247</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-475247</guid>
		<description>Congratulations to Hillary! She ran well, she prepared her whole life for the presidency, and she prepared well. I sympathize with her that there is a greater FORCE at hand. I contributed to her campaign in the past but right now OBAMA is what the country needs. Bush and all his cronies with 1 million years of experience have devastated our country!! It&#039;s definitely not all about experience. OBAMA is WISE, and wisdom beats Experience any day!
Neither Hillary or McCain CAN STAND against an inspirational movement - they will be swallowed-up by it. I feel sorry for Hillary losing her dreams to some UNKNOWN, young senator. How can he it be that he is standing toe to toe against a political maverick like Bill Clinton and his well-know first-lady, senator wife??  How can it be that Obama is able to collect more money than these long-time democratic institutions?? This movement is more than meets the eye and Hillary&#039;s little campaign efforts are futile against it - God always has the final say. YES! WE CAN!! 
Contribute to the Obama movement - its the power of the people!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations to Hillary! She ran well, she prepared her whole life for the presidency, and she prepared well. I sympathize with her that there is a greater FORCE at hand. I contributed to her campaign in the past but right now OBAMA is what the country needs. Bush and all his cronies with 1 million years of experience have devastated our country!! It's definitely not all about experience. OBAMA is WISE, and wisdom beats Experience any day!<br />
Neither Hillary or McCain CAN STAND against an inspirational movement &#8211; they will be swallowed-up by it. I feel sorry for Hillary losing her dreams to some UNKNOWN, young senator. How can he it be that he is standing toe to toe against a political maverick like Bill Clinton and his well-know first-lady, senator wife??  How can it be that Obama is able to collect more money than these long-time democratic institutions?? This movement is more than meets the eye and Hillary's little campaign efforts are futile against it &#8211; God always has the final say. YES! WE CAN!!<br />
Contribute to the Obama movement &#8211; its the power of the people!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Good Grief</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-475235</link>
		<dc:creator>Good Grief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-475235</guid>
		<description>Maybe Latinos are voting for Clinton b/c she&#039;s promising them so many hand outs.  I&#039;m an educated Latina, but have no doubt that a majority of uneducated Latinos would vote for Hillary b/c 1) she&#039;s willing to dish out lots of money and lots of welfare and 2) believe what you like to believe, but I&#039;ve encountered a lot of racist Hispanics, inlcuding within my own family.  
At the same time, LEGAL CITIZENS do not like illegal immigrants, so I believe that they just are not aware that HIllary is promising amnesty to illegals.  We need to educate everyone here.  
I CANNOT understand why anyone would vote for Hillary Clinton.  Were these people around when her husband was the president?  Say what you will about Bush, he didn&#039;t corrupt our country on his own, he inherited most of the mess.  Use your brains people!  Hillary is a horrible person and would divide our country more than it already is.  AND you&#039;ve got to ask yourself, who would the terrorists, illegal immigrants, special interests groups like to see as president...probably Hillary.  That&#039;s enough to make me vote for anyone but.  As a woman, I would LOVE to see a woman in office...but a woman deserving of leading this country...that is not Hillary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe Latinos are voting for Clinton b/c she's promising them so many hand outs.  I'm an educated Latina, but have no doubt that a majority of uneducated Latinos would vote for Hillary b/c 1) she's willing to dish out lots of money and lots of welfare and 2) believe what you like to believe, but I've encountered a lot of racist Hispanics, inlcuding within my own family.<br />
At the same time, LEGAL CITIZENS do not like illegal immigrants, so I believe that they just are not aware that HIllary is promising amnesty to illegals.  We need to educate everyone here.<br />
I CANNOT understand why anyone would vote for Hillary Clinton.  Were these people around when her husband was the president?  Say what you will about Bush, he didn't corrupt our country on his own, he inherited most of the mess.  Use your brains people!  Hillary is a horrible person and would divide our country more than it already is.  AND you've got to ask yourself, who would the terrorists, illegal immigrants, special interests groups like to see as president...probably Hillary.  That's enough to make me vote for anyone but.  As a woman, I would LOVE to see a woman in office...but a woman deserving of leading this country...that is not Hillary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cathy Lyons</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-475122</link>
		<dc:creator>Cathy Lyons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-475122</guid>
		<description>Hillary can thank the Latinos for California because they all think she&#039;s going to do great things for them...But so did the Conservative Evangelical Christians who heartily supported Bush in &#039;04.  And then Bush never panned out with his promises to ban gay marriage or end abortion, because in actuality, no President or Presidential hopeful can necessarily deliver such high and mighty promises.  It&#039;s Congress that usually makes the final judgement, and if Congress doesn&#039;t support the President, then his/her promises to whomever about whatever are pretty much moot. So there ought to be no whining should such hopes for the betterment of certain people go unmet by well intentioned albiet vote-mongering Candidates who win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary can thank the Latinos for California because they all think she's going to do great things for them...But so did the Conservative Evangelical Christians who heartily supported Bush in '04.  And then Bush never panned out with his promises to ban gay marriage or end abortion, because in actuality, no President or Presidential hopeful can necessarily deliver such high and mighty promises.  It's Congress that usually makes the final judgement, and if Congress doesn't support the President, then his/her promises to whomever about whatever are pretty much moot. So there ought to be no whining should such hopes for the betterment of certain people go unmet by well intentioned albiet vote-mongering Candidates who win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doug</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-475054</link>
		<dc:creator>doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-475054</guid>
		<description>The longer view:

As is ever true, we will get exactly the President we deserve, no more and no less.  This is the way of democracy, and unfortunately , it does not bode well for us. Lets not forget this country just elected George Bush twice.  We will again elect a government that reflects our ignorance and fear, because as a nation we are primarily ignorant and fearful.  This has nothing to do with our candidates; it has to do with ourselves.  We are a country on a steep decline, economically, morally, culturally,  And ultimately, we are a people in denial.  Our thinking, our actions, our beliefs are entirely out-of-step with the realities of our world and our place in it.  It doesnt matter who we elect, not one bit.  

But there is a sliver lining.  Our country&#039;s decline allows the rest of the world to catch up a bit and rise a few pegs out of the extreme poverty billions are in.  As we continue spend our way into national bankruptcy the rest of the world will benefit. This is the way of the universe, no?  Mother Nature and her cycles is a determined force.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The longer view:</p>
<p>As is ever true, we will get exactly the President we deserve, no more and no less.  This is the way of democracy, and unfortunately , it does not bode well for us. Lets not forget this country just elected George Bush twice.  We will again elect a government that reflects our ignorance and fear, because as a nation we are primarily ignorant and fearful.  This has nothing to do with our candidates; it has to do with ourselves.  We are a country on a steep decline, economically, morally, culturally,  And ultimately, we are a people in denial.  Our thinking, our actions, our beliefs are entirely out-of-step with the realities of our world and our place in it.  It doesnt matter who we elect, not one bit.  </p>
<p>But there is a sliver lining.  Our country's decline allows the rest of the world to catch up a bit and rise a few pegs out of the extreme poverty billions are in.  As we continue spend our way into national bankruptcy the rest of the world will benefit. This is the way of the universe, no?  Mother Nature and her cycles is a determined force.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lola</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-475023</link>
		<dc:creator>Lola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-475023</guid>
		<description>Jorge, what does watching Oprah have to do with Asians and Latinos? Plenty of both races watch her show. If you are trying to suggest that her political views are the reason why Obama is doing good you are wrong. As you can clearly see having endorsements does not equal more votes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jorge, what does watching Oprah have to do with Asians and Latinos? Plenty of both races watch her show. If you are trying to suggest that her political views are the reason why Obama is doing good you are wrong. As you can clearly see having endorsements does not equal more votes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-475005</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-475005</guid>
		<description>I am a Dem and will not vote for Obama due to the media bias in his favor. And besides, no person EVER has done more to hurt the Democratic Party than Barrack Obama. Because of his Cult of Obama, the Republicans are going to win in November.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a Dem and will not vote for Obama due to the media bias in his favor. And besides, no person EVER has done more to hurt the Democratic Party than Barrack Obama. Because of his Cult of Obama, the Republicans are going to win in November.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-474999</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-474999</guid>
		<description>Look the Media is owned by big corps. the very thing Obama supports in his websites-freemarkets economy-a license to steal from the american voter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look the Media is owned by big corps. the very thing Obama supports in his websites-freemarkets economy-a license to steal from the american voter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Naj Castilione</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-474919</link>
		<dc:creator>Naj Castilione</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-474919</guid>
		<description>Obama won mid-America, RED states.  Hilary did not come close to his numbers?  I LOVE Bill Clinton, but why do we want to go back to the Clinton era?  And why are Hispanics so mad at blacks?  A lot of white people like me voted for Obama.  Alaska, Idaho, Colorado..do I need to go on?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama won mid-America, RED states.  Hilary did not come close to his numbers?  I LOVE Bill Clinton, but why do we want to go back to the Clinton era?  And why are Hispanics so mad at blacks?  A lot of white people like me voted for Obama.  Alaska, Idaho, Colorado..do I need to go on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca - CA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-474900</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca - CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-474900</guid>
		<description>Hey Jessie Diaz???  So it is just about &quot;race&quot; in your part of the country?  Sadly, this is why you are blinded by the &quot;electability&quot; dynamic.  When I was told that Latinos will not vote for a Black candidate, I thought this must be wrong.  It is people of color, in general, that have had to struggle to obtain the American Dream.  So suddenly, a White Woman who has no identification with your struggle is your candidate?  Why don&#039;t you then support a Hispanic candidate, if it is all about &quot;race&quot; with you?   So, apparently, while blinded by your racism, you will throw your support behind a candidate that cannot unite even the Democratic party, much less the rest of the country.... and you help to elect another Republican... now that is really progressive of you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Jessie Diaz???  So it is just about "race" in your part of the country?  Sadly, this is why you are blinded by the "electability" dynamic.  When I was told that Latinos will not vote for a Black candidate, I thought this must be wrong.  It is people of color, in general, that have had to struggle to obtain the American Dream.  So suddenly, a White Woman who has no identification with your struggle is your candidate?  Why don't you then support a Hispanic candidate, if it is all about "race" with you?   So, apparently, while blinded by your racism, you will throw your support behind a candidate that cannot unite even the Democratic party, much less the rest of the country.... and you help to elect another Republican... now that is really progressive of you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CHERYL</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-474855</link>
		<dc:creator>CHERYL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-474855</guid>
		<description>CNN IS BIASED AND NEEDS TO BE BOYCOTTED! HOW MANY TIMES DOES SOMEONE HAVE TO SAY THIS BEFORE SOME FAIR REPORTING HAPPENS?????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNN IS BIASED AND NEEDS TO BE BOYCOTTED! HOW MANY TIMES DOES SOMEONE HAVE TO SAY THIS BEFORE SOME FAIR REPORTING HAPPENS?????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CHERYL</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-474827</link>
		<dc:creator>CHERYL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-474827</guid>
		<description>HILLARY WON BECAUSE CALIFORNIANS ARE NOT STUPID! AND DID NOT FALL FOR BORACK&#039;S SMOKE AND MIRRORS TACTICS!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THEY KNOW THAT THEY CANNOT AFFORD TO GAMBLE ON WHO CAN CHANGE THIS COUNTRY! HILLARY HAS PROVEN HERSELF! IF BORACK WAS NOT BLACK HE WOULDN&#039;T EVEN BE IN THIS RACE! HE IS LUCKY TO EVEN SIT NEXT TO HILLARY DURING THE DEBATES! AND HE KNOWS IT!!!!!!!!! HILLARY GAVE A LOVELY SPEECH LAST NIGHT! BORACK SOUNDED SPOILED AND RUDE LIKE A BABY!!!!!!!!!!!! HE WILL HAVE TO ADMIT DEFEAT IN NOVEMBER, LETS SEE IF HE CAN DO IT LIKE A MAN!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HILLARY WON BECAUSE CALIFORNIANS ARE NOT STUPID! AND DID NOT FALL FOR BORACK'S SMOKE AND MIRRORS TACTICS!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THEY KNOW THAT THEY CANNOT AFFORD TO GAMBLE ON WHO CAN CHANGE THIS COUNTRY! HILLARY HAS PROVEN HERSELF! IF BORACK WAS NOT BLACK HE WOULDN'T EVEN BE IN THIS RACE! HE IS LUCKY TO EVEN SIT NEXT TO HILLARY DURING THE DEBATES! AND HE KNOWS IT!!!!!!!!! HILLARY GAVE A LOVELY SPEECH LAST NIGHT! BORACK SOUNDED SPOILED AND RUDE LIKE A BABY!!!!!!!!!!!! HE WILL HAVE TO ADMIT DEFEAT IN NOVEMBER, LETS SEE IF HE CAN DO IT LIKE A MAN!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: camie</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-474814</link>
		<dc:creator>camie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-474814</guid>
		<description>One way to truly unite the  Republicans is to nominate Hillary. I really don&#039;t think she&#039;d win the race against McCain- the Independents would defect to him in droves, the Republicans that would vote for Barack won&#039;t vote for her, and the 40- 50% of Dems that dislike her politics and policy will have  a hard time punching a ballot for her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One way to truly unite the  Republicans is to nominate Hillary. I really don't think she'd win the race against McCain- the Independents would defect to him in droves, the Republicans that would vote for Barack won't vote for her, and the 40- 50% of Dems that dislike her politics and policy will have  a hard time punching a ballot for her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-474803</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-474803</guid>
		<description>Like it or not Republicans will bring up race through the swift boat group against Obama and Move-on.org will operate down on their level.  That will activate the Republican turnout.  All Hillary has to do is show up and that activates the base.

Either way it is not going to be nice and will again devide the Nation.

Bob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like it or not Republicans will bring up race through the swift boat group against Obama and Move-on.org will operate down on their level.  That will activate the Republican turnout.  All Hillary has to do is show up and that activates the base.</p>
<p>Either way it is not going to be nice and will again devide the Nation.</p>
<p>Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlotte</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-474780</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlotte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-474780</guid>
		<description>Why do all the news people and pundits have to divide us in groups? I for one find it replusive.  Hopefully, a majority of people vote for the best candidate.  I am a white woman, over 50 and  yes I voted for Hillary.  Not because she is a female but because I truely believe she is the best person for the job.  I am one of the cross over democrats who voted for Reagan.  I did so, not because I thought he was best, but because I didn&#039;t trust McGovern.  Now I have the same feeling for Obama.  I don&#039;t trust someone who says something, then says he didn&#039;t say that.  Someone who can not look someone in the eye when they talk, is sneaky.  When you have rallys the closest person to you, is behind you.  You look out and over people and have a prepared speech.  A crowd of people who want to be inspired will react like the person next to them, they get wrapped up in the frenzy.  If he were on his pulpit with only one person, what would the reaction be to, yes we can, yes we can?  Think about it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do all the news people and pundits have to divide us in groups? I for one find it replusive.  Hopefully, a majority of people vote for the best candidate.  I am a white woman, over 50 and  yes I voted for Hillary.  Not because she is a female but because I truely believe she is the best person for the job.  I am one of the cross over democrats who voted for Reagan.  I did so, not because I thought he was best, but because I didn't trust McGovern.  Now I have the same feeling for Obama.  I don't trust someone who says something, then says he didn't say that.  Someone who can not look someone in the eye when they talk, is sneaky.  When you have rallys the closest person to you, is behind you.  You look out and over people and have a prepared speech.  A crowd of people who want to be inspired will react like the person next to them, they get wrapped up in the frenzy.  If he were on his pulpit with only one person, what would the reaction be to, yes we can, yes we can?  Think about it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David in California</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-474720</link>
		<dc:creator>David in California</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-474720</guid>
		<description>Please stay in the race Mitt!  You are the only hope for THE GOP and the country.  

McCain and his back door policies are just dispicable!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please stay in the race Mitt!  You are the only hope for THE GOP and the country.  </p>
<p>McCain and his back door policies are just dispicable!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sig, Los Angeles CA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-474520</link>
		<dc:creator>Sig, Los Angeles CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-474520</guid>
		<description>Hillary should thank early voting.  Results show Obama won those who made up their mind in the past week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary should thank early voting.  Results show Obama won those who made up their mind in the past week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: artseafartsea</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-474492</link>
		<dc:creator>artseafartsea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-474492</guid>
		<description>The only reason Obama got support among white men is that they are so afraid of having a woman, white, black or red, for president.  But wake up America (and also CNN).  We will have a woman president in November!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only reason Obama got support among white men is that they are so afraid of having a woman, white, black or red, for president.  But wake up America (and also CNN).  We will have a woman president in November!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NB</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-474331</link>
		<dc:creator>NB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/how-clinton-mccain-may-have-won-california/#comment-474331</guid>
		<description>I never thought I would see the day when the Democratic party would be so racially split, at least the Democratic Party in my lifetime.  It is really sad,because for the first time in eight years we have the opportunity to  unite as a party and take back the White House. I&#039;m a Democrat because I believe in health, liberty and the persuit of happiness for ALL Americans, not just for a select few, mainly the rich.  We are the party that stands up for the poor, the disadvantage, the left behind. What happened? We have forgotten why we are democrats and have turned on each other. Blacks are voting for Barak Obama because he is black and we know it. Maybe women are voting for Sen. Clinton because she&#039;s a woman. No different than during the 70&#039;s, whites voted for Ronald Reagan because he preached getting people off welfare (we knew the &quot;people&quot; they were referring to). Race and gender has always been a divisive issue for our country, but the Democratic party should not become the poster child for racial divide. I am black and a female, but I have no allegience to Barak Obama because he&#039;s black or Hillary Clinton because she&#039;s a female. I will vote for the person who is best suited to run this Nation, will represent my interests, and leave this Nation better for my children and grandchildren than how this current administration will leave it. Democrats, let&#039;s unite. Leave your emotions out of this decision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never thought I would see the day when the Democratic party would be so racially split, at least the Democratic Party in my lifetime.  It is really sad,because for the first time in eight years we have the opportunity to  unite as a party and take back the White House. I'm a Democrat because I believe in health, liberty and the persuit of happiness for ALL Americans, not just for a select few, mainly the rich.  We are the party that stands up for the poor, the disadvantage, the left behind. What happened? We have forgotten why we are democrats and have turned on each other. Blacks are voting for Barak Obama because he is black and we know it. Maybe women are voting for Sen. Clinton because she's a woman. No different than during the 70's, whites voted for Ronald Reagan because he preached getting people off welfare (we knew the "people" they were referring to). Race and gender has always been a divisive issue for our country, but the Democratic party should not become the poster child for racial divide. I am black and a female, but I have no allegience to Barak Obama because he's black or Hillary Clinton because she's a female. I will vote for the person who is best suited to run this Nation, will represent my interests, and leave this Nation better for my children and grandchildren than how this current administration will leave it. Democrats, let's unite. Leave your emotions out of this decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
