February 8, 2008
Posted: 03:26 PM ET
CNN Anchor Wolf Blitzer.
CNN Anchor Wolf Blitzer.

WASHINGTON (CNN) — Former President Bill Clinton is still out there actively campaigning for his wife. He has toned down his comments in the face of some severe criticism, especially in the days before and immediately after the South Carolina primary. In defending Hillary Clinton, he was accused of going way too far in criticizing Barack Obama. The argument was that other campaign leaders should do that – not a former President of the United States.

“She’s the best qualified person to be president I’ve ever had a chance to support, and I feel strongly about that,” Bill Clinton told a reporter from WCSH in Portland, Maine on Thursday. “And I think there’s nothing wrong with me saying that.” He then added: “But what I learned from that whole dustup, and all the things people saying that I didn’t, is that as long as I’m promoting her no one can have an objection; but I can’t defend her. Someone else has to do that.”

There is no doubt that Bill Clinton is a huge asset for his wife’s campaign. He remains extraordinarily popular among Democrats. But there is also no doubt that he can – and probably has – hurt her chances by aggressively defending her record. He now openly acknowledges that. Other surrogates and supporters will have to do the defending for him.

I started covering Bill Clinton in November 1992 – just before he was elected. I then stayed in Little Rock for nearly three months during his transition to the White House, and then became CNN’s Senior White House Correspondent for seven years. It was clear to me then – and it remains clear now – that he is one of the most astute political strategists out there. Politics is in his blood. He truly understands the process even as he occasionally makes some serious blunders. When he does, he is among the best in damage control.

– Wolf Blitzer

Filed under: Wolf Blitzer


Sandra   February 12th, 2008 8:15 pm ET

Wolf, why in the world don't you report that the republicans are voting for Obama in every state that has open primaries or caucuses to defeat Sen. Clinton. Your bias against Sen. Clinton is appalling.

BW   February 11th, 2008 10:23 am ET

I have vigorously supported the Clintons all my adult life. I have given money, campaigned, and voted each time Bill was on a ticket (and dragged anyone I knew along with me). I was equally delighted to see Hillary join the Senate from my former home state of NY. I have supported him; I defended him; and I forgave him for allowing his personal indescretions to divide our nation.

I have since become enlightened and learned from my mistakes (unlike Bill). The Clintons lack integrity and will do ANYTHING to WIN.

QUESTION: As a taxpayer, we pay (and rightfully so) for Bill's Secret Service protection. Now that Bill is campaigning around the clock for his wife, is the Hillary Campaign reimbursing the federal budget for the extra agents, travel, and numerous overtime hours–must be in the millions by now !!!

No more votes for the Clintons and I AM NOT COMING BACK!!!

Anyone but Hillary

steve   February 9th, 2008 10:08 am ET

hey u venomous obama supporters dont eva abuse him, see for urself wat ur how mny women have u ditched and slept with!!!!Atleast he realized his mistake and now is playin role of a heroic spouse to a heroic woman
GO HILLARY GO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
MADAM PRESIDENT 08

mmy   February 9th, 2008 10:03 am ET

I just read interesting articles in New York Times about Obama's earlier years. Has anyone done a thorough check into this person? He may have much to hide……..

Sandra Compton   February 9th, 2008 9:39 am ET

Hillary is the most experienced an understands the issues better.She will win a debate against mccain.In this time of crisis here an around the world no one has the experience and background she has to tackle these problems. cnn has always been my news station,but why are you so in favor of obama? This totally shocks me that you can be so unfain toHillary.

Dusacre   February 9th, 2008 8:59 am ET

For November 2008, ABC (Anybody But Clinton)

Nobama   February 9th, 2008 2:05 am ET

Bill just tell it as it is. But Media and Obama campaign are more than happy to spin his words. Shame on you!

Love Bill!
Love Hillary even more!

HIllary for President!
Nobama for talk show host!

Seattle for Hillary!   February 9th, 2008 1:50 am ET

Bottom line. More substance to Hillary. And Universal Health Care!
Go Hillary 2008!

Bimmer   February 8th, 2008 8:47 pm ET

Wolf:

Why do hate Hillary?

Ashley - Bay Area, CA   February 8th, 2008 8:45 pm ET

Bill Clinton, although liked by just about everyone I know, ruined any chance of Hillary ever getting my vote! When he decided to cheat on his wife in their house, in Americas house, he humiliated Hillary & our country. It's as if everyone forgets that happened! Hillary couldn't keep track of her husband in her own home, & I am supposed to somehow believe that she can keep track of an entire country?! Her husband cheated on her & she stayed with him. That shows she is a weak person! I want someone strong in office, that's why I voted for Barack Obama!

Dana in Maryland   February 8th, 2008 8:40 pm ET

Clinton was an effective ( notice I didn't say good ) President because as has been mentioned above, he is a master manipulator and though I have slightly more respect for Hillary, She is not above the same tactics. Both like to take credit for things they really had nothing to do with. But hey, that is politics right? I don't see that sort of person in Obama and while as an independent I've voted republican more often than not when confronted with the worst choices the democratic party could dish up, in Obama, I feel like I can support his social ideals and his natural respect for others. The Clintons lost my trust long ago. and I'd vote for McCain who I disagree with on many issues before I'd vote for Hillary because I feel like he can be trusted. With Obama, I get both trust and a sense of someone who has his priorities straight and for whom being president is about our country, not about him.

Anita   February 8th, 2008 5:26 pm ET

Another Canadian for Clinton

sg   February 8th, 2008 5:21 pm ET

Wolf after long ttime I have heard some positive about Clintons from CNN. You have already damaged her before super Tuesday and we were very disappointed with CNN. CNN constantly bringing Gloria and Rollin Martin. As soon as I see Rollin I already know what he is going to say. Lou Dobbs is really fair and balance. Clinton does not deserve to be treated like this. This country was prospor when clinton was president. We are given one more chance and we should welcome this.

Scott, Royal Oak   February 8th, 2008 5:21 pm ET

Carl -
Glad to see you've joined the 900 commenters crying about the alleged CNN bias against the Clintons. Thanks for showing me how to be an "original" poster. Keep crunching those numbers, big guy…

JOYCE GILLIAM   February 8th, 2008 5:21 pm ET

FROM ARKANSAS
LET THE VOTERS NOT FORGET THE CLINTON YEARS IN AND OUT OF OFFICE, LETS GO FORWARD WITH OUT WITH THE OLD,IN WITH THE NEW, OBAMA FOR PRESIDENT.CAN'T BE ANY WORSE THEN THOSE YEARS.I WORKED IN HUD REPOS.THEN AND HAD MORE WORK THEN EVER IN MY LIFE.PEOPLE LOOSING HOMES TO MORTAGE CO

marie   February 8th, 2008 5:20 pm ET

For the life of me, I cannot fathom why anyone thinks putting Hillary in office will magically bring back the golden Clinton years. Yes, times were a whole lot better. Yes, I voted for him myself. But she is her own person, and more importantly, the world is a very different place. Vote for her because you believe in her, her stance on the issues that matter to you, and her ability to make change happen, not because of what life was like when her husband was president. To those who think Obama is all about sunshine and rainbows and silly dreams, I say returning to the '90s is the one dream we can safely say is IMPOSSIBLE.

For Hillary   February 8th, 2008 5:19 pm ET

To all of you who bash Hillary - what have YOU done? She has quite a Resume. You could not hold a candle to her. She is running to be President of the United States - that is not exactly a small accomplishment.

As far as the Clinton's past goes - what's in YOUR past!! Give it a rest.

Charlie   February 8th, 2008 5:19 pm ET

Wolf, what do you have to say about Obama's clothes? What a silly chauvenistic remark to make about Hillary's clothes. She has a well thought out plan for every area of government. How about talking about policies. She'd win easily against either Barrack or John. All you guys out there who think a man has to be in the White House, It's time to admit that Hillary is the best for the job. Let go of your "good ole boys club" and be brave.
It's great to have so many new voters, but let's make sure they're informed voters. These kids need to know the history of the 90's when our economy was excellent and we lived in peace. Let Hillary bring that back for us!!!!

Isobel   February 8th, 2008 5:17 pm ET

Surely it must be illegal to have a perjurer and disgracer of the White House back in office… which is what will happen …. What is this world coming to ????
God help us …..

omatseye   February 8th, 2008 5:17 pm ET

Hillary Wins nomination…. Democrats loses!

GP   February 8th, 2008 5:16 pm ET

If Antichrist appears in the U.S. he will sure get his 666 marks on million. Americans gravity to new people, strange people, people with charisma and easily impressed. I am amazed how easy it is go impress American. Hillary is a good person.

Elizabeth   February 8th, 2008 5:14 pm ET

Ann. . .the economy was not great. . . . we were all living a lie. . .Remember Enron. . . the financials of many of the leading companies in America were fraud. .. . the fraudulent filings were during the Clinton administration. . .they were revealed and hundreds of thousands if not more workers lost their retirement (stock incentives) because of the turning of the eye of the Clinton administration.

He sold everyone that times were good. . . but like taking a loan, you get the money up front and pay for it later.

Harrison   February 8th, 2008 5:13 pm ET

Obama has neither charisma nor substance! Neither empty chatter nor empty rhetoric provide a speaker and the fanatics with "empty promises!"

ABB - ANYONE BUT BARACK

Do your homework! It will not take you long to determine that Hilliary has an extensive record for everyone to review, rebuke, and even praise! What do you find when you review Barack's record? Absence of anything of substance, absence of any depth on any topic! What a surprise! There is NOTHING THERE!

Leah   February 8th, 2008 5:13 pm ET

Wolf, i do not understand why you guys are not reporting anything about Barack Obama!!!!!!!!! You keep giving the clintons more air time as usual talking about Hillary's outfit!!!! are you serious!!!!!!!! Bill Clinton is a spouse just as Michelle Obama is, we haven't even seen her anywhere talking to the crowds or anything. I am from another country and all i have to say is that if Hillary is the nominee for DNC party, do not even think for a moment that the international crowd will give a hoot about listening to what she has to say, especially because they will be dealing with the same old folks!!! only this time it will be a woman. You guys think you are ready for a woman president, but is the world ready???????? considering their way of politics and their views culturally about women, forget it. On the issue of Obama's experience, this man is not only experienced but he's as intellegent as they come something Hillary does not have. She's so tied to the past that it will be the same OLD stuff, especially given that Hillary has a lot of special interests and lobbyists even funding her campaign. And she has the nerve to talk about change!!!!!! NEED I SAY MORE!!!!! IF Obama is not the president, something is really wrong with America!!!!

RT   February 8th, 2008 5:11 pm ET

DDrbc

Here is what you said about Bill Clinton. "Who cares who he slept with? JFK was a rabid womanizer. It's time to give Bill the props he deserves. - PLUS he's not afraid to back a woman candidate for President."

Pick apart that statement and see how foolish it makes you look. Keep drinking the Kool-Aid Clinton supporters……..

You folks will say anything in their defense against a pretty serious track record of scandal and debauchery.

Sharon   February 8th, 2008 5:11 pm ET

+

Sen. Obama Blasts Cheney's Energy Policy - however He Voted For It

Way to go

DAVE   February 8th, 2008 5:11 pm ET

FED UP WITH ALL THE POSITIVE SPIN THE MEDIA IS GIVING OSAMA AND BASHING THE CLINTIONS. HILLARY WAS RIGHT IT TOOK A CLINTON TO CLEAN UP AFTER THE FIRST BUSH AND IT WILLBE A CLINTON CLEANING UP THE BUSH MESS AGIN.

mary   February 8th, 2008 5:09 pm ET

hey bill needs keep up the good work if his name was on the ballet we would have voted for him

Joe Jacques   February 8th, 2008 5:08 pm ET

Hillary, experience? What a joke? She spent the majority of her working life as a corporate attorney and then sat on the Board of Wal-Mart where she did not have enough guts to speak up for unions. She then became First Lady and failed at the only major initiative she tried, health care. She has since then become a Senator primarily on the merits of her husband's name and reputation. When you really examine the records, it is Obama who has a lot more experience working for the poor and disadvantaged. Bill Clinton is the one who has experience in the Clinton family, not Hillary. But he's not running last time I checked, or is he?

paulette, Glendale, CA   February 8th, 2008 5:08 pm ET

All of you who are Clinton haters-there is no pleasing you. You would prefer a dem candidate who would make a better preacher than a statesman leader. Or are you supporting a snarly, bad tempered, too old for the job republican. It would be fair if each one of us evaluate the impact that the Clintons had on their lives. For me, it was a positive impact. I was gainfully employed, did well financially and my investments were compounding and I did not have to be hide from my non american relatives, who thought we made much too much of Bill's indiscretions and to look beyond and get a life. Now after 8 years of Bush, its the reverse of all of this. I, for one, would like the two-fer. CNN has done much to promote a negative stance about the Clintons and the rest of you Clinton haters are either walking in lock step or using it as a crutch to support your already biased views of them.

tomdavie   February 8th, 2008 5:08 pm ET

I love all this 'educated' nonsene

If educated upwardly mobile yuppies had a brain, they would see Obama has no actual experience on a national scale, and its irresponsible to stick someone like that in charge of 10,000 nuclear weapons.

But no. All they see is its 'trendy' and FAST TRACK. They all worship Obama because they are also chaffing at the bit to MOVE UP the ladder, just like Obama is going from entry level to KING in one fell swoop.

Thomas   February 8th, 2008 5:07 pm ET

Hi Wolf. I really like your show (The Situation Room). Please continue to be fair and balanced in your covering of the news?

I was extremely disappointed to hear the attacks that the fomer president made about Sen. Obama, but I was even more disappointed to hear Sen. Clinton make that comment about what she percieved as the legacy of the Rev. Dr. Marin Luther King Jr.: Saying Dr. King's legacy is that it took a president of the U.S. to sign civil rights into law. I see King's legacy as much more than that! He was a uniter, not a divider. He was inspirational in his deeds ( incredible non violent civil disobedience demonstrations), inspirational in his speaking (inspiring people to act and stand for moral correctness), and these two things mentioned entailed a great deal of matters. So, for Sen. Clinton to say Dr. King's legacy was merely that it took a president to sign civil rights into law was intensely disappointing to me!

I want all of us Americans to be united, and I feel Sen. Obama is the one to move us closer toward that purpose.

Goodbye for now, Wolf, but be aware, I will always be watching The Situation Room. I love the graphics, the music, and especially your delivery of the news!!!

Julia   February 8th, 2008 5:04 pm ET

I find it highly ironic that half the comments on here are accusing Wolf Blitzer and CNN of a bias towards Clinton, and the other half are accusing them of a bias towards Obama. I think it's pretty fair coverage when the "bias" is split in half so nicely, don't you?
Anyway, a very nice blog today Wolf. I was a child during Bill Clinton's administration, and even growing up with conservative Republican parents I still noticed how much he helped this country over his eight years in office. I do agree however, that he is out of line in his tactics. There is a huge difference between defending your wife and her campaign versus attacking someone. I think the Mr. Clinton should know better because as you said, he is an astute political strategist. He should understand that attacks only bring down a campaign.

I forgot to tell you this in my last comment, but excellent coverage on Super Tuesday! I stayed up all night watching CNN, and for once I actually somewhat understood what was going on!

Shaireen   February 8th, 2008 5:03 pm ET

Hi, I live in Canada and I love to watch debate between Clinton and Obama but why Obama rejects to participate in a debate sponsored by The Politco and ABC7

Robert   February 8th, 2008 5:03 pm ET

How come we have not heard what Michelle Obama has to say??? I think it is appalling how the Media is so biased. I guess beating up Bill is good for ratings!!! When I listen to Obama I hear a lot of “We are ready for a Change!” “I’m asking you to believe in Change”, yet I don’t ever hear how he is going to change things? It is apparent that he doesn’t know how he is going to change things. If the economy keeps going the way it is, it will take a lot more than “Inspiration” to get this country back on track. If we (the Democratic Party) don’t get behind Hillery soon, we will be looking at McCain (Bush 3) in the white house for four more years!!!

Woz - Los Gatos, CA   February 8th, 2008 5:01 pm ET

Bill Clinton won on charisma.

Barack Obama will win on charisma.

Hillary Clinton has no charisma.

End of story.

For Hillary   February 8th, 2008 5:01 pm ET

For everyone out there that does not want Hillary and dislikes Bill - there are more that do! Don't much care who does not. Bills personal life was never anyones business, the press is the one that made it everyones business. The press should shut up and bud out - then and NOW.

HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT!!

Sean Chong   February 8th, 2008 5:01 pm ET

We need a politician to rule us, not a CEO, nor a chramastic speaker!

Lisa- Greensboro,NC   February 8th, 2008 5:00 pm ET

To Independent:

"Take the Clinton name away and she is nothing", you said?
Take the name away and you still have a brillant woman who has done much in the last 30 years. The Clinton name didn't buy her a degree from Yale and it didn't buy her where she is today. It amazes me to see so much jealously toward both of the Clintons. Bill was a wonderful President and Hillary will be a brillant one.
No matter how much coverage CNN or other media gives him. He will still be in her shadow. She is the real deal.

Anonymous   February 8th, 2008 4:57 pm ET

Liability! Can she really keep him reined in?

Kevin   February 8th, 2008 4:57 pm ET

To DDrbc, et al - I agree, I don't care who Bill Clinton slept with or where or whatever.

He lost me though when he came on t.v. and looked me directly in the eye, wagged his index finger at me, and in a very condescending manner simply stated "I never had sexual relations with that woman"

He lied directly to me and then got caught and then tried to slip out of that.

We had a great (almost) eight years under the Clinton/Gore administration. Then because of his oval office antics, we lost the White House for eight painful years.

He abused his power and his position.

I may be proven wrong, but I don't believe a President Obama will abuse his power and position - even for a sexual dalliance.

And the fact that I believe a politician again says lots about the power Obama has already.

Ann   February 8th, 2008 4:56 pm ET

For all those here who have posted "sick of Clintons"…
yeah…let's not go back to the Clinton days..

Who really wants a balanced budget with no deficit,
reduced government spending, a great economy,
no war, those school programs for better education
that benefitted our kids…really…

Life is so much better when you have something to complain
about, right?

Elizabeth   February 8th, 2008 4:55 pm ET

Liability. . . The man makes a press event to tell everyone that he is taking a backseat in the campaign.

If Hill really was in command of her campaign, she would yank him from the tour and then when asked would say that it is her campaign and she was calling the shots and that Bill was busy getting her drycleaning done and making her green tea.

Nicole, Wisconsin   February 8th, 2008 4:55 pm ET

Fact Check: Sen. Obama Follows Hillary's Lead On Gulf Coast Recovery Plan
2/7/2008 1:03:02 PM

In May, Hillary introduced a comprehensive Gulf Coast Recovery Agenda.

Three months later, in August, Sen. Obama released a very similar proposal.
Today, Sen. Obama "introduced" the same plan he released in August.

BETH   February 8th, 2008 4:55 pm ET

GET OVER BILL CLINTON! JUST BECAUSE BOTH CLINTONS ARE SMARTER THAN YOU STOP LIEING/

v.ananthan   February 8th, 2008 4:53 pm ET

HAS OBAMA BOUGHT CNN?

ALWAYS FINDING STUFF IN FAVOUR OF OBAMA !!!!!!!!!!!!

YOU TOO BLITZER ……………

I Carscallen   February 8th, 2008 4:52 pm ET

Surely it can't be legal for a Bill Clinton …disgracer and perjurer …in the the White House and Grand Jury to be allowed back in the White House … what is this world coming to … ????

Jim Russell   February 8th, 2008 4:51 pm ET

Have we forgotten that Bill examplified that it is ok to smoke pot as long as you do not enhale, and oral sex is not adultry - cheating on your wife.

American   February 8th, 2008 4:51 pm ET

Bill Clinton defends his wife,why shouldn't he,from what i have seen from Obama he is running a popularity contest,couldn't believe on one web sight he wouldn't cross his heart and say the pledge of Allegiance.

Stacy Clarks, Texas   February 8th, 2008 4:51 pm ET

It funny to see the hillary supporters say Bill is not running, and clinton is, and in the same sentence say Bill clinton years were the best in this country. Well reality check, hillary was not president then, and how does being first lady account for "experience" and how did she contribute to the clinton years being the "best in this country"

That's a contradiction, i suggest you pick one, either way, Barak is much better equipped to win against the Repubicans in November!

Obama/Edwards 08

ps: who else is annoyed that Edwards has yet refused to endorse a candidate. This can break this dead heat race, and hopefully propel Obama forward!!

kay   February 8th, 2008 4:49 pm ET

I am 41, in my life time and in my opinion Bill Clinton has been the Best president. We have never seen better economic times than we did in the 90's. His stand for AIDS and OBESE children really says alot about his character. With all of the issues we are facing in the world… social security diminishing, lack of health care, our economy, the war, immigration, global warming. Can we really afford to vote for Obama? I realize the republicans have been pushing Obama because they feel he could never become our president BUT what if???… It is possible…. maybe the Republicans and Media will stop for a moment and think to them selves… If our Plan back fires… Do we want Obama running our country with NO experience. THINK ABOUT IT. SOON WE WILL REACH "THE POINT OF NO RETURN"

Jenny   February 8th, 2008 4:48 pm ET

I agree with Veronica and I hope people really begin to understand this — both candidates stand for the same things and have good solutions for helping the country. And both are very smart and would surround themselves with good cabinet members. We are voting on leadership abilities. Morals. Character. And this is why I'm supporting Obama and not Hillary. Obama has integrity and Hillary (and Bill) hae less. As much as I supported the Clintons — through everything when they were in the White House — it really is time to move on. In all respects. She is NOT, in any way, a uniter. Smart, yes. Dedicated to good causes. Yes. But she is polarizing and the country, and every one who deeply cares about the next decade and beyond needs to understand the implications of putting her in the White House. There will be more scandals, and shady dealings. It will be a missed opportunity to heal the country and inspire people to become activists. Obama is not inexperienced either. I'm tired of hearing that. She is threatened by how much people are moved by his authenticity and I hope people understand that, whereas she is smart politician, so is Barack PLUS he has integrity.

grace seitz   February 8th, 2008 4:48 pm ET

Bill Clinton was the best president in many many years. I hope Hillary gets to be our next president. Bill will help her tremendously. Will be nice to have real brains back in the White House.

Janet   February 8th, 2008 4:47 pm ET

I would like to see Hillary and Bill do her POKE-POKE-CLAP-CLAP dance together on stage …I think the Clinton supporters looooooove that stuff and I have to admit I get a good laugh out of that too !

Janet

NOBAMA NO WAY   February 8th, 2008 4:47 pm ET

I TOTALLY AGREE!!! MEDIA FAVORITISM FOR OBUMMER!!

"How can you shown Obama"s stump speech in Seattle for almost in its entirety "without giving Clinton equal time. Its as if you have a favorite candidate in this race. Come on be fare."

SUPPORT HILLARY CLINTON!!!

Nina   February 8th, 2008 4:47 pm ET

i AM SICK AND TIRED OF CNN AND WOLF BLITZER, HE JUST PLAYED 10 MINUTES OF OBAMA IN WASHINGTON STATE AND THEN INTERVIEW ED COLIN POWELL AND TRIED HIS BEST TO GET HIM TO ENDORSE OBAMA. CNN AND WOLF BLITZER MAKES ME BELIEVE FOX NEWS NOW. I BELIEVE FOX IS FAIR AND BALANCED. I USED TO BELIEVE THAT ABOUT CNN BUT NO MORE.
NINA
ARKANSA

JA Cook   February 8th, 2008 4:47 pm ET

" ….don't think Bill was divisive or created distractions, did you forget already how prosperous our country was during those Bill years. He cleaned after first bush messes, now that Obama is in race every body thinks IT"S FANCY TO SAY DIVISIVE JUST LIKE OBAMA. HE SAYS THOSE WORDS TO MAKE PEOPLE FOUL AND MAKE THEM CRAZY JUST LIKE GEORGE W.BUSH, DON"T you all forgot WHAT GEORGE BUSH GAVE US. IF OBAMA GETS WHITE HOUSE, HE DOES EXACTLY SAME THING, WE NEED ANOTHER CLINTON TO CLEAN UP AFTER SECOND BUSH….."
*******************

It is absolutely frightening to think that a group of people that write things like this will have impact on who leads our country… There is a sad pattern here on these blogs.
Scary and as I said, sad.

David Florida   February 8th, 2008 4:47 pm ET

Howard Dean has pointed out that when Democratic nominations come down to Superdelegates and conventions they have problems.
The last two occasions show this clearly. Adding electoral college votes for the two elections.
Republicans more than 900 votes
Democrats less than 70 votes.
Has this been pointed out to the candidates ?

Three months ago this race was such that Republicans struggled to even find candidates, so big was the advantage. Now we have a divided party that is tearing itself apart. How did Democrats manage to achieve a position like this ? These two results show just how damaging it can be, how leads are cast aside for personal gain and how the Republicans get landslide victories.

ClintonFatigued   February 8th, 2008 4:45 pm ET

The Clinton's getting puff piece articles right before this weekends voting…….

Obama who?

Is Bill running again or is this perjured, disbarred, impeached serial adulterer just digging the spotlight as usual?

Mrs. Bill Clinton would be nowhere near the presidency is she were simply Hillary Hornswaggle.

ABC.

Roxie   February 8th, 2008 4:45 pm ET

Rush, Ken Starr and their ilk have suceeded in haveing people see reality as they have created it. The anti clinton opinions reflected here prove that you can fool most of the people all of the time.
Obama is counting on that and the GOP love it.

Hillary 2008

Why does the GOP still fear the Clintons?

vicki   February 8th, 2008 4:43 pm ET

Gotta tell you CNN–I am so concerned with this Obama frenzy. Last night there was a wonderful special on CNN with Anderson Cooper about the problems facing the nation–enormous tasks ahead. I believe that before Oprah came out for Obama he was a virtual unknown–Oprah kick-started this whole frenzy along with the internet youth craze. Every time that Obama speaks his speeches are the same thing over and over…..He has yet to tell me what exactly he intends to do in each of the enormous tasks that CNN proposed to the american people. I think this is why Hillary wants these debates because she knows in her heart that he cannot handle all that will be infront of him. I say shame on the media for making Bill Clinton the scapegoat for Obamas tactics. Bill Clinton is not racial nor did he plan any kind of attack on black america. Lou Dobbs said it best when he said that Bill Clinton had some of the best answers for americas problems. Hillalry Clinton gets my vote because she is most presidenial like and experienced. This media frenzy has just been beneficial to Obama, very straticigally planned. I want to hear him give specific answers. If Obama gets the most delegates there will be a frenzy in Florida and Michigan because the voters will–more than ever want to be counted. Gotta tell you CNN Obama is not ready if he doesnt have these answers on his sleeves. The men out there better wake up……………

M   February 8th, 2008 4:42 pm ET

Veronica Ward listen to Wolf, that politics in the of blood of Bill Clinton and he does it good. At least one knowns what they are good at stick to it. Obama has the charisma but no experience in another couple years, he will be matured after been trained by the Clintons.

Go Hillary 08!

Any one who says that their mother didn't do good by training them is laying. Behind every good man is a woman so verse versa.

B.Pierce, Arkansas   February 8th, 2008 4:42 pm ET

Wolf, Why is it that every time you mention Democrats , Obama's face appears on the screen. You are supposed to be fair about all candidates, also i just watched Obama talk for about 10 minutes on your show, that looks like free advertisement.

Anne in East Aurora   February 8th, 2008 4:42 pm ET

Maybe someone has reported on this, and I have missed it. But is anyone taking a serious look at the folks behind the candidates? I mean literally.
OK, no big surprise that McCain, Romney et all are surrounded by white guys.
I mean 'the crowds' at an Obama or Clinton event. Watch their faces. The 'crowd people', up close, to Clinton are taking pics,usually by cell phone, and often are looking around kind of disengaged. They're checking out the action and the action is not always HRC.
Now take a look at the folks at an Obama crowd. Yes, the most 'all-American' mix of any candidate, but also engaged in a way they aren't at a Clinton event. Facial expressions- reacting to words. Smiles, cheers, solemnity. Engagement!
CNN should be pulling in their psychologists and get them looking at reels of film. Anything quantifiable going on here?

charlie   February 8th, 2008 4:41 pm ET

Liability! Any man that will go to a public hearing and state he is telling the truth and onlt the facts that support it about past events is a liability.

hillary should of divorced him long ago.

owen   February 8th, 2008 4:41 pm ET

Do you know why Obama does better wih more educated voters. It's because we know the truth and the facts. By the way, what experience is Hillary counting on when she has consistently made errors in judgement (such as the iraq war, iran, No child left behind Act " ) without satisfactory explanations? wasn't Bill clinton around to advise her? Or was he just as naive as she claimed to be?

The Clintons politics has always been divisive and people who know them or have examined their actions know this.

You know Chealsea Clinton may have more experience than Obama?
I mean she was in the white house so i'm guessing she should be able to lead to. So when she's 45 she just might have 35 years of experience .

Lets all tell ourselves the truth. Vote for intergrity,honesty and character.

vote for change. Obama 08!

krk, MN   February 8th, 2008 4:40 pm ET

Simple, Over sized baggage, which she can't get rid of even if she wanted.

Barack Obama Supporter from Lawrence Kansas   February 8th, 2008 4:40 pm ET

Bill Clinton is a huge liability, not only to his wife's campaign, but to the country.

I used to respect him, but for the way he lied, attacked, and distorted Barack Obama, I will never respect him, nor will I ever vote for Hillary.

He is dishonest, greedy, power hungry, and full of himself, and HE JUST CAN'T STAND IT THAT HE IS NOT THE ONE RUNNING. Him and Hillary are seething and drooling for power just like "Schmeigel" in The Lord of The Rings.

THE BOTTOM LINE:

Hillary will lose because she already has over 100,000,000 people who can't stand her, don't trust her, and WILL NEVER VOTE FOR HER. She cannot attract Independents and Repiublicans. She will lose.

Barack Obama represents a CLEAN BREAK from the past, can INSPIRE MILLIONS, and has already garnered the support of Republicans and Independents.

Bill Bennett, the conservative radio show host, said on CNN Tuesday night: WE REPUBLICANS ARE PRAYING EVERY NIGHT THAT HILLARY WINS THE NOMINATION. She is the only hope for Republicans in November.

Obama 08

seaofwhite   February 8th, 2008 4:40 pm ET

Very funny, Wolf. The same was asked about Hillary by Time or People back when Bubba was running for President.

Turns out, they are both a liability, but it didn't stop him from being elected - twice.

W, Calgary, Canada   February 8th, 2008 4:40 pm ET

Dude - if the Dems run Hillary then the Reps win. If you really want to change, you have to go Obama. He would win against McCain… Hillary would not. And, Obama does not have chances in the future. He's already said he won't run again… once for the family is enough. See… he isn't wanting of the achievement of president - he'd like to make a difference and has one good effort available. I'd be the same. To put your family through this twice is simply self-centered. Oh, and Hillary has not done so much in New York… gimme a break!! And, her health care plan… like ours up here in Canada… you're being suckered… she cannot ever deliver that - it's an over the top quantum leap for you guys. At least Obama's health plan is a big improvement that is actually debatable and could be argued to a reasonable, positive conclusion that can be implemented. Hillary will give you nothing and simply blame the Reps… like she does already. Why can't Clinton supporters grasp the reality of what can be done if you try hard versus what can be dreamed and dropped on the floor. Idealism will get you - McCain!!! C'mon!!

Brad   February 8th, 2008 4:38 pm ET

Hillary isn't entitled to 'her turn'. The way she acts like it's owed to her has chased away a lot of potential supporters. If we're going to keep electing the same two families, we should have skipped that revolutionary war business.

NOBAMA NO WAY   February 8th, 2008 4:38 pm ET

It's about time the media starts covering something besides the hot air balloon Obomber.

If he's so wonderful, why can't he speak without his teleprompter?? That's the only time he sounds "motivating" - because he's reading. I can sound motivating when reading a short sentence at a time! No suprise he didn't want to have a DEBATE with Hillary - she eats him alive in debates, because she is smarter and knows the issues and what we need to do to fix the problems our country is facing.

Hillary Clinton is BEST PREPARED TO BE PRESIDENT!

DEFLATE THE HOT AIR BALLOON!

VOTE SENATOR CLINTON FOR PRESIDENT 2008

COMCAST.NET   February 8th, 2008 4:37 pm ET

TO GAVIN , YOU SAID THAT YOU THE VOTERS DECIDE WHO YOUR NOMINEE WILL BE, BUT THE SUPER DELEGATES WILL DECIDE WHO WILL BE THE CHOICE, WHICH MEANS YOUR VOTE DOES NOT MEAN NOTHING, YEAH THATS A FUNNY NAME FOR YOUR PARTY DEMOCRATIC WHEN THE BOSSES DECIDE MAKES ME GLAD I HAVE AND ALWAYS WILL BE A REPUBLICAN, BY THE WAY GAVIN WHAT WAS BILL CLINTONS EXCUSE FOR NOT SERVING IN VIETMAN JOHN MCCAIN SERVED HIS COUNTRY AND LOST 5 YEARS OF HIS LIFE IN ENEMY HANDS MY WIFE AND I WILL PROUDLY CAST OUR VOTE FOR MCCAIN IN NOVEMBER ON THAT SUBJECT ALONE

Chats   February 8th, 2008 4:37 pm ET

I like them both, but I am for HIllary Clinton. I was for her long before Barack ever decided to run. Now I know he has the right to run - but frankly I think he is a spoiler. She was SO far ahead - everfy poll showed that she would have beat every Republican candidate and she had everyone's backing. Then Barack came in and now everything is split down the middle.

The way I see it is we could have had it all. I think HIllary easily would have won and Barack could have waited 4 or even 8 years - would still be a young man (52) and then he would have won - imagine that - the first woman president AND the first black president - now THAT would have made history!!! And been wonderful for the country.

But he just couldn't wait - so now no matter what happens now the Democrats will be divided - women will be mad or blacks will fill cheated..and watch those Republicans swoop in and win again. What a waste!

King, GA   February 8th, 2008 4:36 pm ET

Deligate count so far: Clinton 1,033; Obama 937. Clinton leads in popular vote also. Another big story today is that Hillary is winning New Mexico. Winning is on Hillary's side, CNN (bunch of media junkies) on Obama side. Money doesn't buy presidency. Obama's millions of dollars won't affect my voting. I voted for the person I thought is the best for the economy, healthcare, education, foreign policy and the nation in general. If it were not for Wolf, I wouldn't watch CNN anymore. Wolf, you are the only one controlling your emotion. Please can you train Jack Cafferty and Gloria (whoever her last name is) how to control their emotions and be a real journalists? Thank you in advance!

JADA   February 8th, 2008 4:36 pm ET

PLEASE…SHHHHHHH, AND VOTE

William Sharp   February 8th, 2008 4:35 pm ET

Bill, in many ways was a great president. Barry Bonds in many ways was a great baseball player. But for serious flaws (which will never be forgotten) neither Bill nor Barry will go down with the best of their occupations (Bill will rank considerably higher than George W). Using baseball Hillary has been on deck for a long time as the favorite in the on deck circle but her batting average is not overwhelming. Perhaps a pinch hitter?

Yeah Right   February 8th, 2008 4:34 pm ET

Wolf, at least you are finally almost coming clean that instead of being a journalist, you are one of the surrogates that comes to poor Mrs. Clinton's defense whenever reality bites at her heels. Hold back the truth Wolf, you can do it. Tony Snow's job looks sorta cushy doesn't it?

rudy cosentino   February 8th, 2008 4:33 pm ET

How can you shown Obama"s stump speech in Seattle for almost in its entirety without giving Clinton equal time. Its as if you have a favorite candidate in this race. Come on be fare.

Paul   February 8th, 2008 4:32 pm ET

I've always been a supporter of Bill Clinton, and I would've voted for him again if I could. However, he really needs to slowly fade out into the background, and let Hillary and her own supporters shine. He also needs to be less publicly critical of the candidates, as it only seems to hurt them in the long-run. All he should be doing is going out to those places who want to hear him, specifically, and speak on behalf of Hillary's merits and keep the speeches positive.

John in Columbus, OH   February 8th, 2008 4:32 pm ET

I will not vote for Hillary, not even in the General. I'd rather McCain be President.

She will say anything, do anything to be President.

marie   February 8th, 2008 4:30 pm ET

It's true, he should really just step aside and hand her the presidency because she has a little more experience. And we should all support that, regardless of how we feel about her, her stand on the issues, and what kind of president we think she'd be.

Please. I dread what a long campaign might do to fracture the party, but that doesn't mean roughly half the party should just give up fighting for what we believe in.

Independent   February 8th, 2008 4:29 pm ET

Hillary is running as a Clinton. Take the Clinton name away and she is nothing. Take the Clinton image out — however controversial — and she is nothing. All she has is Bill Clinton. So how can he be a liability?

The Clinton camp just failed to account for the possibility of an Obama factor and now they are not quick-thinking enough to handle him. They thought she would just come, say she is a woman, and win without a sweat. They were wrong. Now the Clintons are decreasing and Obama is increase — and America with him.

Summer   February 8th, 2008 4:29 pm ET

I have been thinking not cheering on the side line of Clinton nor Obama. However, now I am leaning against Obama, for two reasons.

1) Clinton has been preaching us about her 32 years of experience, and that to me is a shameful statment. becuase, in 32 years, I have not seen a change, so are the Clintons determin to get in the White House to sing the same song and make it a retiring house (senior citizen house)? She should be ashamed to have the audacity to tell us her 32 years of experience, to me its has been 32 years of nonsense.

2) Her health care plan "universal health care", well, didn't she make that promise since 1991? At least, I have counted 16 promises of getting "unversal health care" plan coming out of her mouth since 1991, so it has been all talk, and now she wants use that line again? We have been fooled once, but you can't fool us again.

Please someone from CNN double check my fact about her 16 promises in regards to her health care plan since 1991. That should be a good question to ask her.

Thanks,
~Samer

In Change, I believe, in experience I doubt!

c.k.   February 8th, 2008 4:28 pm ET

I think Obama is nothing but dreams , facades and slogans, he isn't saying what he would do to fix this country. He watched hours of tapes of Bill Clinton speeches and is now imitating him. He then listens to what Hillary says and he adopts what she says. He is a non person with no personality or presence he has to copy someone else. He isn't even a full term senator no experience, the job of the President of the United States is not a place to get "ON THE JOB TRAINING!!!!" Wake up Democrates half the party is saying if Obama wins the nomination they will vote republican!! So the republicans will retain the White House. Stop trying to just be PC Obama is NOT ready.

Ynot19   February 8th, 2008 4:27 pm ET

Frank…I understand your point but if what you say is true.. The Great Hillary should have defeated "inexperienced" Obama badly in the democratic debates, which has not happened. Every analyst indicated the one-on-one debate was a tie at best with Hillary winning the first half and Obama the second half. Did you listen to Hillary's response on the Iraq war…. It was painful.

Hillary will energize the GOP and will not win any independents. When both of these happens, she will lose to McCain..The numbers are just not there… I am going with Obama

Damian   February 8th, 2008 4:25 pm ET

Gore's biggest mistake was distancing himself from Bill Clinton in 2000…
and that's essentially why he lost.

Bill's modified role, will work very well for Hillary's campaign.

At the moment, America can only dream of having the same peace and prosperity, that was Bill's Presidency.

The only candidate that can realistically achieve this is Hillary.
Remember it'll take a Clinton to clean up after a Bush!

jessica   February 8th, 2008 4:25 pm ET

Why does CNN keep bashing the Clintons???? Why do they not focus on Michelle Obam stating she would think about supporting Hillary if she becomes the nominee? Yeah so the change that Obama preaches where is it? Or is it that no bad media attention is given to the Obama because they are affraid of the Al Sharptons of the world. Why is last week all day the interview with Michelle Obama was played all day? Where is Hillarys segment on her life's work? CNN please stop being so bias and favoring the Obamas. GIve the Clinton's the same respect and air time as the Obamas.

Sam   February 8th, 2008 4:24 pm ET

The Clintons have had their turn and are the past. I am waiting on the Hill and Bill Clinton reality show. As long as it is not in the White House.

Moses   February 8th, 2008 4:24 pm ET

Democracts, stand behind Hillary, this is her time, she has worked hard in her whole life, and she can deliver what she promises, look at what she has done in New york. If Democracts cannot stand now for a woman, you will never see a woman president again. Obama is a good guy, but he has more chances in future. He should now give in and run with Hillary. Hillary for president and Obama for Vice president, and in this way, Obama can slowly gain the experience everyone doubts about. It is time for Democracts, unite yourselves and get the republicans out, and if you do not do it now, it will never be again.

W, Calgary, Canada   February 8th, 2008 4:24 pm ET

Bill Clinton was a poor president in a time when he needed to do nothing for an economy that was running itself. Hillary has not "stood on her own"… she has relied on Bill and does very little to stand as a legitimate, strong example for her gender. I agree, Bill is an astute politician. But that's gamesmanship, and it is time we had a president who really meant it and not just someone who wants to "win" another game in their personal career of collecting victories and listing achievements. For all you folks who praise Bill Clinton as president, I guess you must simply have such low personal standards that you'd be equally as happy to vote for the next American Idol champion to be president. Indeed… the standing ovation has lost all meaning in this world.

Carol   February 8th, 2008 4:23 pm ET

I try not to listen to the whole "distortion in media" conspiracy … but … I saw someone on CNN the morning after Bill Clinton made the Jesse Jackson comment in South Carolina and that person said it was a very small part of the conversation and that the question put to Bill Clinton at the time was about Jesse Jackson !!!

I'm Canadian, so I'd prefer if a democrat wins … even though our dollar went from .60 to 1.00 in the past year under Bush. But the idea that the media is leading the voters to think a certain way is disturbing.

James   February 8th, 2008 4:21 pm ET

Liar & Liability!

Adarrah for Obama   February 8th, 2008 4:21 pm ET

Bill and Hillary blast Sen Kennedy for No Child Left Behind and don't mention that she voted for it. Even more troubling, NAFTA is Bill's baby.

Anna Ghita   February 8th, 2008 4:21 pm ET

Good job, Mr Blitzer.

Mike J.   February 8th, 2008 4:20 pm ET

Wolf thank you finaly something good said about the Clintons.Can you if CNN has the guts.Do a report about how the media played a big part of Obamas success.Ask americans if the media was not pushing for Obama and changing peoples words around to get him nominated if they would have different fealings towards Hillary Clinton.I think Cnn and other media channels should appoligize to Hillary Clinton.If it wasnt for the media the democratic party would have Hillary Clinton as their nomony.So if she loses and Obama gets the nomonation the white house goes back to the republicans it is on the medias shoulders for the relentlis atacks on Clinton and the shoving of Barak Obama down our throats.

Mike J.

The Decider   February 8th, 2008 4:19 pm ET

Come on Wolf and CNN.. you have 5 BS articles on the Clintons on here and only 1 on Obama. Give me a break. All you people that whine CNN is backing Obama better take a look back at all of the articles for the so called establishment "status quo" and that includes the Republicans. Talk about a long shot fighting his way to the top and will probably get the shaft in the end is pretty sad. Open your eyes America, nothing is going to change with McCain or Clinton!!!!!!!!!

JA Cook!!What's wrong   February 8th, 2008 4:17 pm ET

I don't think Bill was divisive or created distractions, did you forget already how prosperous our country was during those Bill years. He cleaned after first bush messes, now that Obama is in race every body thinks IT"S FANCY TO SAY DIVISIVE JUST LIKE OBAMA. HE SAYS THOSE WORDS TO MAKE PEOPLE FOUL AND MAKE THEM CRAZY JUST LIKE GEORGE W.BUSH, DON"T you all forgot WHAT GEORGE BUSH GAVE US. IF OBAMA GETS WHITE HOUSE, HE DOES EXACTLY SAME THING, WE NEED ANOTHER CLINTON TO CLEAN UP AFTER SECOND BUSH

Ann Independent Media,PA   February 8th, 2008 4:15 pm ET

Just to set the record straight. The Center For Media and Public Affairs CMPA did release a report that found all news networks were favoring Senator Obama 2-1 in their news coverage. Senator Clinton finished last, this included the Republicans too.

Ellie Garcia   February 8th, 2008 4:14 pm ET

He will always defend his wife.Whatever anyone thinks of him he is first and foremost a husband.

Jorge from California   February 8th, 2008 4:12 pm ET

Wolf,
you know that both of these people are bad for America! you know and you at CNN are affraid to tell all the nasty things that they have done! you hide the electoral fraud that they did in California, in the peter paul case, you guys don't talk about all the deals that Bill Clinton have make with minning companies en the ex-soviet union, getting more than 100 million dollars. you guys at CNN say that you keep the honest, but you hide the fact that hillary takes money from special interests…. why don't you talk about how much money she takes from them and how Barack Obama is rasing money form regular people like me!

MD from MD   February 8th, 2008 4:12 pm ET

Hillary is her own person, that is true. I thought she was inevitable about one month ago. I woulda voted for her…

BUT — Her husband stepped in and repeatedly reminded us that he wants a piece of the pie. Why didn't he just let her shine? He knows that when he speaks, people listen so he abused that power and overshadowed the actual candidate.
She's a strong woman right? Well why did SHE LET HIM make a mockery of their campaign. How ANTI femanistic. Pathetic….my husband doesn't come to work and fight my battles!

The Clintons reminded me of the past and LOST my vote.

ExHillary supporter

Audrey   February 8th, 2008 4:12 pm ET

Really Wolfe, Bill is trying to get back in the White House for himself. I'm not sure Hillary is running for herself as President.

GO OBAMA

cici   February 8th, 2008 4:11 pm ET

Billy is a LIABILITY ..no doubt… he's wants a third term in the WH. Both Clintons have way too much negative history, too many unresolved and illegal issues (ex missing WH furniture, Foster's death, White Water, mistresses) to put them in again. They are bold-faced, power/greed-driven politicians. No more Dynasties! Vote NO to Hillary; YES to Obama!

cb   February 8th, 2008 4:11 pm ET

Why doesn’t the media pay more attention to what Obama has done throughout this career, how he stands on issues both past and present . And by the way who couldn’t be an intercity organizer?

If Obama gets the nomination Ted Kennedy & John Kerry will be telling him how to run this country, he just doesn’t have the experience.

I also think that many of Hillary's supporters will vote for McCain.

Bob   February 8th, 2008 4:10 pm ET

The tiger can't change his spots. Oh, wait, he did! Good for him!
-Jack Handey

MG   February 8th, 2008 4:09 pm ET

of course politics is in his blood and it comes so natural to him because by nature he is a self serving, egotist that will do and say anything to win. He then worries about the ourcome later which he addresses with more lies, half truths and distortion. One of the biggest reasons he wants back in the White House is to validate his status in the world and to cover up and make up for all the mistakes they made the first time. These are divisive bad self serving people. Wake up America before your fooled again.

Hillary   February 8th, 2008 4:09 pm ET

Bill Clinton years were the very BEST in few decades of America history - no matter how media cover and put him on wrong spot - Some of you need to learn how acknowledge the facts or some day you have to

Hillary 08

Dennis   February 8th, 2008 4:09 pm ET

We have to be able to go with a 50 state campaign. Which candidate would be able to do that successfully for the Democratic Party.

Russell Nc   February 8th, 2008 4:08 pm ET

Bill should go hide. He disgraced the office and was only the second president to be impeached.

Natalie   February 8th, 2008 4:06 pm ET

Please–HILLARY Clinton is running, not Bill. Bill is not allowed to run again. This seems to be confusing a lot of people who think voting for her means getting the '90s back, and it really has to stop. I think that's one thing Obama supporters and true Hillary supporters could easily agree upon.

Moses   February 8th, 2008 4:05 pm ET

Atleast Wolf you have today something positive about Bill Clinton. Unfortunaltely no one in Cnn, supports the Clintons, even after a flourishing period he was in office. I wonder where this so called the best political team on television went to school, they are the worst political team on earth. Caffertery, shame on you, try to show that you really went to school sometimes. Dont show your hate on television network, everyone hates you.

Felly   February 8th, 2008 4:04 pm ET

Bill Clinton is a liability, and I approve this message.

LL   February 8th, 2008 4:04 pm ET

To Mike
In case you didn't notice, CNN covered Michelle Obama in a lengthy special interview right before Super Tuesday and played it again and again.

mike February 8, 2008 3:48 pm ET

Why don't you cover obama's wife to the same degree? Or when Oparah or Ted Kennedy make even more deliberate attacks, why don't you spend 10 hours a day discussing that? Oh yeah, it's the ratings. The same way AC spends time criticizing the media covering Brittney Spears, all the while he's showing clips of her in some crazed mental state.

Lawyer2B   February 8th, 2008 4:04 pm ET

Penny, the Republican Party with all its money and power are 0 for 4 versus the Clintons. The GOP never defeated Bill Clinton in a Presidential election and they won't defeat Hillary this time either.

Bill   February 8th, 2008 4:04 pm ET

Wolf, what a shame!! You and the CNN political team are so in love with Obama. I am very disappointed. I have always been a loyal CNN viewer and I hate to see how biased toward Obama you at CNN are. I expected more from you.

Reality Check   February 8th, 2008 4:04 pm ET

For hillary supporters to not like how CNN reports the news they sure spend a lot of time on this blog…if you really stood for what you believed in you wouldn't be posting on CNN blog.

do   February 8th, 2008 4:03 pm ET

Wolf, Legislation says that no President can run for President after eight (8) years; Hillary took Bill Clinton's last name in marriage; doesn't that break the Law? Bill is still going to be the President!! This error slipped by with Bush Senior, and Bush Jr.; This is not healthy; It is saying that we are a revolving, sick, retarded country; and no one else can do the Job; If the Clinton's win, this means over 30 years two families have led this Country; The Clinton's need to get there daughter married and enjoy their grandchildren!!

JA Cook   February 8th, 2008 4:03 pm ET

Bill Clinton served us with two terms of divisiveness and distractions. As an accomplished master of spin and adjusted truth, he knows full well what he's saying and doing.

He's Hillary's major flaw in my book and I cannot vote to help restore him to the White House for a third term.

Lawyer2B   February 8th, 2008 4:03 pm ET

Michelle Obama's comments about Hillary Clinton have been the most vile, dark and disturbing words I have ever heard. She was up there saying them, but it was Rush Limbaugh's tone, content and tenor.

CNN hasn't even touched Michelle Obama for her attacks.

Paul   February 8th, 2008 4:02 pm ET

I think both the Clintons are a liability to our Country. I keep seeing people talking about how Clinton is the best because she is "seasoned", "knows how to do things in Washington", she learned so much from being the "First Lady". For me all I've seen out of the people running this country for the last 30 years is how well they can screw the average American, myself being one of those. To mention a few with Reagan we lost company paid retirement when he started the breakup of labor unions with the ATC group, and eventually created the "your on your own retirement" 401K plans that the individual has to contribute to even tho you're not paid enough to live paycheck to paycheck. The Bush(s), tax cuts for wealthy and Corporations and too many other things to list. The Clintons with NAFTA, and all the scandles, lies and everything else they brought shame to the White House with.

Looking back on all this makes me think of a part of the Declaration of Independence that is so fitting to this time in our nations history.

"But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."

For my part I think it's time for the New Guard to move in.

Obama '08

Linlo   February 8th, 2008 4:02 pm ET

Why does CNN leave people who aren't HIllary Supporters "in moderation"?
While Bill's out there in Louisiana right now doing it all over again? It really is the Clinton News Network.

Cheryl Roberts   February 8th, 2008 3:59 pm ET

I would like you to ask Donna Brazile a question. The same people created the super delegates rule that made the rule about throwing out Michigan and Florida delegates. Why is one ruling OK and the other wrong? Sounds like someone just likes some rules and not others…

When a person puts their support behind a candidate I take notice. If they are people I elected and respect I listen to them. Many super delegates influence people to vote in the primary they same way they have committed their support. Why do you think the super delegates shouldn't be involved and part of the voting to elect a president? Is it maybe because they are not supporting your choice for President?

The RULES say the super delegates can and will vote the way they want to vote and will have votes that count.

If you want to say throw out those rules because the popular vote of the public is not being reflected - then bring back all those votes from Michigan and Florida and the delegates behind those votes. That would be just as fair - wouldn't it?

Get real - you follow all the rules or none.

Carl   February 8th, 2008 3:59 pm ET

Oh well, at least they had one nice thing about Clinton today. 1 out of 3,6673 for CNN isn't bad.

My numbers show Obama will come out on top of this next stage with nearly 100 delegates. He would have to do much worse than expected in the university and black demographics and Clinton much better in women to pull anything out. One pundit said she had a chance in Maryland which is 29% black and the 5th highest in college graduates. I don't see it happening.

donnajp   February 8th, 2008 3:58 pm ET

I loved Bill Clinton as president because he loved being our president and did such a wonderful job that we had a surplus not a deficit. I believe people either love the Clintons or hate the Clintons - and 50% love him

bpk   February 8th, 2008 3:58 pm ET

Yeah we're back to glorifying the Clintons. Much better.

Mark S   February 8th, 2008 3:56 pm ET

Sen. Obama Blasts Cheney's Energy Policy, Doesn't Mention He Voted For It

Steve   February 8th, 2008 3:56 pm ET

It's about time Hillary got some attention—Obama and his wife, Oprah supporting Obama and the Kennedys have dominated the news..

Maybe, Hillary can get the budget back in the BLACK like her husband, Bill, did

Roz   February 8th, 2008 3:56 pm ET

if Obabam wins…we lose. Get ready for it.

Boomer 4 Obama   February 8th, 2008 3:56 pm ET

He's not that poular anymore with THIS Democrat!

In the '90's:
I believed him.
I defended him.
I excused him.
I prayed for his speedy recovery after heart surgery

but, now, I absolutely dread the thought of another Clinton presidency!

Madeliene   February 8th, 2008 3:56 pm ET

This is what baffles me about Bill Clinton. He is an astute political strategist, so how would he not know that he was making a mistake when he was so vigorously defending his wife? If he truly believes that Hillary is the best candidate that he has ever seen, why can't he bolster her image? Why can't he use his political talent to help all the American electorate see what he sees in Hillary's candidacy?

I think that President Bill Clinton has hurt her campaign and unfortunately Hillary's campaign has not capitalized as it should have on his extreme political talent.

I hate to sound cynical here, but is Bill Clinton seeing the error of his ways because Hillary loaned $5 million of their money into this race?

We will have to see.

Penny   February 8th, 2008 3:53 pm ET

Just saw posted on MSNBC , Bills at it AGAIN! The Repubs will eat him alive!

FRANK   February 8th, 2008 3:52 pm ET

Sounds to me like an job application for Senior White House Corrospondent ….

This guy is convicted of perjuy and lost his law license. He and his wife are arguably the most talented spin doctors out there - that does not put them in my hall of fame though. His great presidency though let to George Bush and the Iraq war. They were not able to campaign for Al Gore because they were a liability - nat THAT great. American just have a short memory.

Some of the worst leaders in history had been very, very popular at some point in time. That doe snot make them great politicians - effective but not great.

Frank

Bill in NC   February 8th, 2008 3:52 pm ET

Sorry Wolf, I have to disagree with you. I loved the '90s and everything Bill Clinton did during his time in office. However, I've lost a whole lot of respect for him in the past few months. He trudges around the stage like a drunk and keeps jabbing Obama by taking his words entirely out of context. The way the Clintons have been campaigning against Obama is despicable, and is precisely the thing that needs to change in politics.

You're right. He and Hillary are career politicians, and that is why they're using all the dishonest tactics to try to bring down Obama.

Obama can't be stopped!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

GO UB Bulls!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Independent   February 8th, 2008 3:52 pm ET

This time he can be the best in damage control for everyone but Blacks. We don't forget. He has certainly lost his standing in the black community forever. We pick up on operative words very well. Even if the comments were not racial, they were insensative. We don't dislike Hillary, but she will not get the votes of those who were really voting for Bill.

Lauren   February 8th, 2008 3:51 pm ET

So Wolf, what you are saying is that you are indeed completely biased towards Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton. If it wasn't clear from the first three paragraphs of this article, then you confirmed it in the last.

Seriously, does anyone actually believe that when Bill Clinton compared Obama's candidacy to Jesse Jackson's, he was just "defending" his wife. I can't follow the logic of that argument… but then maybe that is because, unlike Wolf, I haven't been "following" the clintons since 1992.

Ann Independent Media,PA   February 8th, 2008 3:50 pm ET

CEO"S of the top news networks must have reeld these Anti-Clinton journalists in. All the glorification Of Senator Obama(For Now) has chilled and hopefully news worthy political reporting will prevail.
Somebody had to do it.

Sam   February 8th, 2008 3:50 pm ET

Just because Bill hasn't had a chance to support Obama, does not mean that Hillary is the most qualified candidate. Did you read how Slick Willy phrased that sentence? Go ahead Bill, support Obama. It's okay.

Mark   February 8th, 2008 3:48 pm ET

Well, good for him.. I think he helps.. Unlike Obama, hes not all talk.. He actually does stuff.. Did we forget what Obama said during the debate? I will be right on day one, then later on he said you can't always be right.. HE ONLY SAYS WHAT YOU WANT TO HEAR. now hes in New Orleans, where was he 2 years ago?? why didnt he want to help then??? The clintons did.

mike   February 8th, 2008 3:48 pm ET

Why don't you cover obama's wife to the same degree? Or when Oparah or Ted Kennedy make even more deliberate attacks, why don't you spend 10 hours a day discussing that? Oh yeah, it's the ratings. The same way AC spends time criticizing the media covering Brittney Spears, all the while he's showing clips of her in some crazed mental state.

Wolf, how about you start seriously covering the resumes of the candidates…show us what each have actually done, not just how well they feed us hot air…because as of late, that's all you seem to cover, "hot air".

Linlo   February 8th, 2008 3:48 pm ET

Yet, there is ole Bill already doing it again - twisting words and spewing his garbage in Louisiana!

Theresa   February 8th, 2008 3:47 pm ET

He is a liability, because as soon as I hear Bill Clinton or see his face, I donate another $20 to Obama.

gene   February 8th, 2008 3:46 pm ET

The only people complaining about President Clinton campaigning for his wife is the media and Obama supporters. You have Obama's wife out on the campaign trail and saying all kinds of comments that have racial overtones and derogatory things about Clinton. When President Clinton defends Hillary its a sin and a outrage, because he was a former President. CNN, MSNBC and FOX has been relentless in anti Clinton bias (I will say, not quite as bad as MSNBC, they are shamless. ) . I no longer watch MSNBC and I think that everyone that thinks the same as me, should quit as well. I am staying with CNN, because the are the best of the worst. I just will turn it off when Cafferty , Gloria and Martin are on. This is a really ugly bunch. Not for their looks, but because of their extreem bias.

Cheryl Roberts   February 8th, 2008 3:46 pm ET

Bill Clinton can never be a liability to any campaign. Including Hillary's. The reason Bill Clinton's remarks were construed to be negative or about "race" was the soundbite the media wanted. Barack and the media wanted to stop the influence that Bill Clinton has so they have made up a negative view. Guess what ? It isn't working. As Gore knows if he had asked Bill Clinton to help him in 2000 we wouldn't have had the mess of the last 7 years with Bush.

If Barack wasn't running against Hillary he would have asked Clinton to support him.. wouldn't he?

Barack continues to negatively attack Hillary yet he is not being called a sexist - why not? Why did he get away with placing his hand on Hillary during the debates without being called sexist?

Shirley Davis   February 8th, 2008 3:45 pm ET

Hillary is her own woman. She will be a wonderful president, clean up the mess left by Mr. Bush, and make History. Who cares who she is married to!! lLeave it alone.

Carlos Nevarez   February 8th, 2008 3:45 pm ET

Remember, this Election will be marked down in the History books. Not only there might be the First female or african american President. If Hillary wins the Election, that will be the First of its kind. Now it's obvious that Bill Clinton is just trying to defend his wife. People make mistakes in life. I sure ain't perfect.

ash   February 8th, 2008 3:45 pm ET

since it is a DIVIDED situation and such situations call for survival and rebuilding relationships later. I am going for:

Mothers vote for another mother
Sisters vote for another sister
Daughters vote for another daughter.

If not now, when, and if we fail this time, it may be many many years before another woman will gather courage to stand and be counted.

Hillary has taken the step and now it is up to us to support her and be counted.

Darren   February 8th, 2008 3:45 pm ET

Who cares! Haven't you already run through this discussion several time on the air?

Having been discussed to death already, it is clear that he is a liability to her campaign. Otherwise why have they muzzled him?

Personally, I say let him keep talking because it merely demonstrates what will happen if he happens to make it back to Oval Office. The past is the past and we should move on with Obama, the future of the progressive movement in the US.

Sharon   February 8th, 2008 3:43 pm ET

Wow,
That was really nice of you Wolf……In watching all the coverage lately, I thought EVERYONE at CNN hated the Clintons…..
Those were really nice words overall………congratulations. You've earned a little respect back :)

Cathy   February 8th, 2008 3:43 pm ET

I wish Bill Clinton would just keep his mouth shut. I really don't think I could stand him in the White House again.

Theresa   February 8th, 2008 3:42 pm ET

I don't want a third term for Bill. Not now or ever! That is all this campaign is about.

bpk   February 8th, 2008 3:42 pm ET

Politics as usual. Bill is sorry he defended his wife? Hillary had to loan her campaign her own money? I don't feel sorry for them.

Notice the large Hillary Campaign ad on the CNN politics front page. I don't think it's an unrelated coincidence that the Clintons are getting a lot of attention today.

The manipulation continues.