February 10, 2008
Posted: 10:38 PM ET
Sens. Clinton and Obama, and former Sen. Edwards before the CNN Democratic debate in Myrtle Beach, S.C.
Sens. Clinton and Obama, and former Sen. Edwards before the CNN Democratic debate in Myrtle Beach, S.C.

(CNN) — CNN has learned that former Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards met with Hillary Clinton Thursday in North Carolina, and is meeting with Barack Obama Monday, to discuss a possible primary endorsement.

The Thursday meeting, which took place at Edwards’ home in Chapel Hill, was followed by a Saturday night session during which the former North Carolina senator and several longtime advisers discussed many issues, including which candidate he should endorse.

The Obama campaign is enjoying a weekend of positive news, after winning four contests in Louisiana, Washington, Nebraska, and Maine. An endorsement by Edwards would provide additional momentum going into the next round of primaries.

At a Chapel Hill party yesterday for Edwards supporters, he gave no indication who he might endorse, or whether that endorsement is imminent. Some advisers are encouraging him not to endorse.

The former candidate is weighing a number of considerations before making his choice - including electability, and who will best promote his ideas.

There are policy considerations at play: there is a sense within the Edwards camp that Clinton's policies could be better for working class Americans. But Obama's anti-lobbyist proposals are more aligned with Edwards’ politics.

In response to a CNN report that Elizabeth Edwards may favor Obama over Clinton, sources close to the Edwards family flatly deny that she favors one candidate over the other.

Filed under: Barack Obama • Hillary Clinton • John Edwards


Toni   February 11th, 2008 3:12 pm ET

Edwards was my choice for President from the start. When he suspended his candidacy I decided on Hillary . I believe she is better qualified than Obama on many levels. Her health care position is more in agreement with Edwards , her work for the poor in this country is also par with Edwards. Obama has the establishment backing him up. The media initially ignored Edwards, forcing him to step down, the media is now ignoring Hillary hoping she'll do the same. Mr. Edwards, please endorse Hillary, do not let big business win. I hope Mr. Gore will also do the same.

Lola   February 11th, 2008 1:01 pm ET

Barack is winning the admiration across the board, because has America's health insurance companies money and best interest at hand and heart.

I'LL VOTE FOR HILLLARY!!!

Damian   February 11th, 2008 12:45 pm ET

Looks like Edwards will endorse Obama.
Which is unfortunate, as Hillary is supported by the poor folks.
She is much more in line with Edwards on social economic issues!
And if Edwards has any credibility left (and is not just making a play for Vice),
he will Endorse Hillary!

Hillary 08!

Cincinnati Slim   February 11th, 2008 11:51 am ET

Every poll indicates that an Obama/Edwards ticket would beat McCain…Clinton/Edwards would be a toss-up !

Both Edwards and Obama will be able to carry some Red/"Fly-over" states which Hillary could not . This is essential if the Dems are to win the Whitehouse !

McCain vs. Clinton is too close to call. Crooked local Republican boards of elections (like Ohio's Ken Blackwell….) could still throw the election to the Republicans if the electoral map looks like the last two presidential elections !

Winning heartland/Red/"fly-over" states is the essential to Democratic victory…

Whose had Enough   February 11th, 2008 11:44 am ET

John Edwards could beat McCain….can Obama?

Sen. Obama better enjoy the weekend. While he''s an excellent and charismatic speaker at campaign events…..he will have a tough time delivering the "youth" vote to the polls should he get the Dem nomination.

He will be subjected to attacks in the general election that will make the 2004 "swift-boating" of John Kerry look like childs play.

John Kerry would be President today had Diddy delivered with MTV''s "Vote or Die" in 2004. They stayed home on election day.

Lani   February 11th, 2008 11:37 am ET

The problem with dems is that we are still living in the past with this Iraq war. No one cares anymore about who voted for. People are more concerned with domestic issues like heathcare, the economy, immigration and social security. This is where the dems are failing we are electing a guy who is more foreign policy and less domestic. We are voting for someone because they are a good person with hope and not a good president. This will be our downfall in Nov. Remember that Hillary and McCain are much stronger on domestic issues. Foreign policy is one piece of the puzzle and both Hillary and McCain will be stronger on those issues as well. Dems should use reason when they vote and not vote with our heart. The heart is a very dangerous thing to make a decision with. Think about when you are in love. And you're in love with someone who is a good person (nice guy) not a good partner (doesn't have a job, doesn't know how to manage money etc.). You still keep going back to that person even though your head tells you this person would not be good marriage material. Yet you go ahead with your heart and wind up in a miserabe marriage. This is the same thing that is happening right now right with the Dems. We are not thinking rationally about who can actually solve our problems. We are only concerned with who is a good person and gives us hope. And we aren't being logical and reasonable about who can solve our problems. Dems you should be reasonable. Vote with your head always. Would you allow a doctor with no experience and lack of a concrete plan to operate on you even though they are a good person? No! Then why would you vote for someone to fix the country who has no experience and no substance to run our country!! We have problems in this country that are unreal. Foreign policy is the least our of worries because again Dems are living in the past about that. We are voting for someone because they were against the war. But the war started 6 years ago. We should no longer be focused on this. In reality it will take us many years and at least a few presidencies before we are fully out of Iraq and considering the reconstruction costs. We may be sorry if we pit Obama up against McCain. McCain will easily win out especially when it comes to issues that matter like domestic issues and even foreign policy. People will vote with their heads in the general election. But you know I guess Dems have not learned their lesson since McGovern, Carter and Bush

claw714   February 11th, 2008 11:32 am ET

i think it dosn't matter who he endorses, or who even wins the democratic nomination. I think that most TRUE democrats won't have much of an issue on which of the two come out with that nomination. Both candidates are for uniting the democratic vote, unlike the circus McCain is serving up with the Republicans.

j   February 11th, 2008 11:26 am ET

John Edwards is doing the right thing right now and hopefully support Obama. –We need to get as far away from intrenched Washington poltitcal insiders as we can.—– No more "Yalies" and Skull and Bones` elite a_ _ hole buddies.

Tony   February 11th, 2008 10:55 am ET

Edwards was my favorite democrat from the start. Now, I hope hr will endorse Obama. Maybe Edwards could be Obama's Viise president!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LKB   February 11th, 2008 10:48 am ET

I like Hillary, but feel that at this crossroads, we need someone with a new vision and a leader not part of the "old school" Washington system- Barak Obama!!

S.B. Stein E.B. NJ   February 11th, 2008 10:41 am ET

I would think that Edwards would be more inclinded to endorse Obama given most of the time that agree on policy issues. I would like to see that endorsement. I don't think it will happen anytime soon.

As for Edwards being a V.P. selection, it is a possible idea. I doubt hat he would take it now. Someone had previously mentioned attorney general for Edwards; that would be a good possiblity. If he was selected as a possible person to fill an open Supreme Court slot, I could see that as well.

Get real   February 11th, 2008 10:37 am ET

Chico,

You didn't read or follow news enough apparently when Clinton was president. You over estimate how good things were, just because of the economy, which was NOT his doing. Repeat after me.. NOT his doing. It all happened under the first Republican majority in 50 years, as did this surplus Dems take credit for all the time. Clintons= scandal and disgrace. Vote McCain.

Lionel   February 11th, 2008 10:27 am ET

I hope that John Edwards would see what I honestly think; that the Republicans are licking their chops if Barak Obama is the Democratic candidate. They will come out in force, and it will be another 8 years of the Republica Party.

ChicoSez   February 11th, 2008 9:55 am ET

Linking Bush and Clinton is like linking Cain and Abel. or saying day follows night means that night and day are the same. Get Real, under the first Clinton Administration we had eight years of peace and prosperity but most Obama backer are too young to remember how it really was, so they parrot right wing big media lies about bad things were. The 90's were great. If peace and prosperity is returning to the past I'm all for it. So keep trashing the Clintons and even if Obama gets the nomination, there won't be party left to support him. Theres always the green party.

Mike   February 11th, 2008 9:50 am ET

Edwards is nothing but a political opportunist.For all his talk about poverty being the cause of his life, he's done nothing to help poor people in North Carolina.

Steven Grumman   February 11th, 2008 9:40 am ET

I think he should endorse Obama.

Edwards is not one of the "old school" politicos. He has introduced fresh, intelligent ideas - contrary with what traditional politicians like Hillary offer.

And, living in the Philippines, I've seen what damage a vengeful, female president can do. And this is the last thing America needs, having just barely survived 8 years of misrule by an idiot.

Tiffany   February 11th, 2008 9:40 am ET

Is this the US Presidency or a royal dynasty?

4 yrs Bush
8 yrs Clinton
8 yrs Bush
…STOP!!!!

These 2 families have torn this nation apart for 20 years already.
Let's get a new perspective going.
Let's get somebody who doesn't have an agenda in continuing the bipartisan bickering.
Let's get some CHANGE!

OBAMA '08
Yes We Can!

Max   February 11th, 2008 9:32 am ET

We did our part. We the people voted. If there's a split and the superdelegates have to actually do something, such as conduct decision making votes, what's wrong with that? OTherwise, can someone please explain why else there are superdelegates? Is the name "super" just because of their elected position (e.g. senator, governor, etc.)? No, superdelegates are ALSO elected officials entrusted with making decisions for our country and if it does come down to a so-called brokered deal, so what? Superdelegates are, at the end of the day, independent of a nominee–they can switch affiliation. Let them do their job in this extenuating circumstance or else, get rid of them and make them be pledged to a nominee like the unsuperdelegates.

Lorenzo   February 11th, 2008 9:05 am ET

Between the Clintons and the Bushes, we more closely resemble an oligarchy style of government than a constitutional democracy. Obama-Edwards… yes we can!

Paula   February 11th, 2008 9:00 am ET

People! Hillary takes money from lobbyist. Does that mean anything to you? When politicians take money from lobbyists, they are obligated to entertain the interests of the lobbyists not the American people.

Be smart, think things through before voting for her. Besides, this election WiILL go to John McCain if she is elected.

My husband is in Iraq. Who are most of the service members hoping for? OBAMA

jd   February 11th, 2008 8:56 am ET

OBAMA/EDWARDS 08!

ttj   February 11th, 2008 8:49 am ET

It's true that they don't need him. They can muck around in the gutter on their own account. All these people that are pleading for Edwards' endorsement on behalf of their candidates should get a life! They ripped off his ideas and now he is supposed to endorse them? Give me a break! Democratic voters get what they deserve from the poor choices they make. Go Obama! Go Hillary! Go get lost!!

Liz   February 11th, 2008 8:30 am ET

John Edwards please endorse Obama! Hillary Clinton may have some good ideas but she will not be able to get anything done. The Republicans hate her and will never work with her. Obama can bring the parties together to get the things done that this country needs! Hillary brings to much "baggage to the white house. Go Obama!!!!!!!!!

STEVEN   February 11th, 2008 8:28 am ET

John Edwards nor the super delegates should be able to determine the outcome of the Democratic nominee. The PEOPLE of the United States are the voters. Michigan and Florida votes should be counted and since Clinton won they should go to her. No revote as some of the newspeople who are so biased towards Obama want–If those two states get a revote–all states should get a revote after the Rezko/Resko indictment. As a registered Democrat, I will vote Republican in the General Election if it comes down to the super delegates or John Edwards.

BH   February 11th, 2008 8:27 am ET

He should endorse the one who offers him a VP position ( if he still has a dream to help Americans )

MIKKI ROBERTS   February 11th, 2008 8:23 am ET

MY EARLY VOTE WENT TO EDWARDS, IF HE ENDORSES OBAMA, AND OBAMA WINS, I WILL HAVE TO REVERT BACK TO THE REPUBLICAN PARTY. MY VOTE NOW IS FOR HILLARY

Jerry   February 11th, 2008 2:49 am ET

I couldn't think of anything more sensible than an Obama/Edwards ticket for the general election. Thus, looking at the already struggling Clinton campaign, an endorsement for Barack Obama would come at just the right time. Admitted, it might achieve a lot when issued just before Ohio and Texas, but a couple of really significant victories in the next couple of days will do the same if not give Obama even more momentum. Looking at all the alternatives out there, there just aren't any if the country truly wants a break from what happened in Washington over the last 20 years.

ObamaDrone   February 11th, 2008 2:45 am ET

He should definitely endorse Obama. No one else can be trusted. We must all drink the kool-aid together.

David, Seattle, Independent   February 11th, 2008 2:37 am ET

Hillary's universal healthcare plan is unrealistic. You can't take one of the most profitable industries in the country with tens of thousands of employees and dispose of it. At least Obama is willing to work with the industry in order to get people covered. It's realistic and it's a step in the right direction.

Starchild, San Francisco, CA   February 11th, 2008 2:04 am ET

John Edwards made millions of dollars as a trial lawyer suing doctors in unjustified medical malpractice suits, driving up the cost of malpractice insurance and consequently making health care more expensive for everyone.

It would be highly ironic if he ended up being part of a ticket headed by someone promising to promote affordable health care.

Heather   February 11th, 2008 2:00 am ET

I think suggesting Edwards take VP under Obama is an insult. You are asking a seasoned US Senator to take the back seat to a single term US Senator that has spent 2 of the 3 years he has been in the Senate campaigning for President.

If you have really researched and understand the candidates proposed policies you would know Clinton and Edwards are and have been more in line. The biggie being the plan for actual Universal health care.

In the last debate Edwards attended he very clearly asked Obama to explain why his health care plan leaves 15 million people out and why as a US Senator he only voted present on 136 votes. This is huge.

Clinton takes heat for making a decision based on the information she had and her vote. At least she takes a stand and does not play it safe to try and avoid having to be held accountable for her vote. If the options are Yes, No or Present and you do not agree with some language in a proposed bill then vote No. Voting Present was nothing more than trying to save face.

John Edwards is a great man and would best serve this country as Attorney General to continue his great work for equality.

Hillary is clearly the best candidate to stand in the General Election against McCain. How can a person with less than 3 years of US Senate experience going to beat McCain? NOT GOING TO HAPPEN. The Republican are going to chew Obama and spit him out.

HILLARY is the best candidate for the job.

YES WE WILL, HILLARY!

Larry   February 11th, 2008 1:57 am ET

If we want real change in Washington, Edwards (I supported him before switching over to Obama) should give his support to Obama. They have more in common and want to same…REAL CHANGE in Washington.

I believe an Edwards/Obama ticket would be a great for America.

Although I have no problem with having a woman as President (it is time for a change in America), I just believe that Hillary's close connection to and contributions from Corporate America will inhibit her ability to take on the K Street lobbyists and also to take on the Corporations who have a chokehold on democracy that we are experiencing at this time.

KRF   February 11th, 2008 1:57 am ET

I hope Edwards keeps out of this until the convention. I would hope he, as well as the political pundits who have been wrong so many times this year, would give the rest of the country a chance to think for themselves. I'm tired of seeing this constant drum beat for all things Obama. I desperately want to see a Democrat back in the White House, but not this candidate, not this time. He may be pretty and speak a lovely tune, but he's got NO experience to back his image. Not the kind of know-how that is absolutely essential at this point in time. To me, Obama is just the Democratic version of candidate Bush in 2000. Appealing, likeable, but a neophyte. I'm not willing to see another person go into office with a slim resume and expect to learn ON THE FLY how to do the most important, most incredibly complicated job in our country. No matter who the VP is, no matter who the Cabinet will be, the president makes the final decisions, so that individual better have the wisdom and the seasoned insight to decide the fates of all of us and future generations. I just don't have any confidence that Obama is that person. If he gets the nomination, I will be forced to vote for McCain because, even though he's a Republican, he's had the knock-downs, the challenges, the set backs–that Obama hasn't experienced yet–and he's come back every time.

NORMAN   February 11th, 2008 1:56 am ET

YOU KNOW WHAT???

CNN IS GUILTY OF POLL TRENDING AND MIND CONDITIONING!!!

THEIR STATS AND NEWS ARE SKEWED IN FAVOR OF THE GUY!!!

JOURNALISM IS SUPPOSED TO BE NON PARTISAN AND OBJECTIVE!!!

TO CNN WHAT COMES AROUND GOES AROUND!!!

KARMA CNN, KARMA MARKED THIS WORD - KARMA!!!

GO REPUBLICANS!!!

Gil - California   February 11th, 2008 1:13 am ET

"if Clinton were a caucasian male we wouldn't be having these discussions?"

Give me a break, if Clinton were a caucasian male, she wouldn't be leaning on Bill's presidency and would hardly be named Clinton, now would she?

Isaac   February 11th, 2008 1:12 am ET

2 hours in moderation for a pro-Hillary commentary? Come on guys…

Virginia voter   February 11th, 2008 1:12 am ET

Mary, do you think Hillary would be fighting for you if she had lost both states??? She didn't fight for your votes before the primary did she? Do you really think she would care about your votes is she had a large enough lead in the delegate race to beat Obama without them? Didn't hear her say a word until things stared getting tight. I do think that all voters should be heard, but the delegates were stripped before the primaries started. That was the time to protest. Do you really think it's fair to change the rules after the fact? You should petition to have your state party leaders replaced. They're the ones that screwed you, not the candidates.

Esther   February 11th, 2008 1:12 am ET

The Democrat nomination NEVER GOING TO FINISH if Florida and Michigan vote will be count ! I am Florida Voter and I am feeling very up set about what decision the party will be do about it and have to ve ASAP!
In another hand dear friends I am convence that the Republican Party has been succesfull voting as independents in the Democrat primaries in all center states tradicionally Republicans! They are supporting as independents voter Obama candidate and also with money if you see the astronomic contribution received by him recently.
John Edwards decision in this point will be important and as a woman voter I will be evaluate his decision.
Don't forget that Florida is one of the major state with big electoral vote: 27 and since now our vote NOT COUNT….. NOT WILL BE COUNT on November 4, 2008!

GO HILLARY, VIVA HILLARY!!!!

CK   February 11th, 2008 1:07 am ET

Do you want to help working Americans or change lobbyist policy? lobbyists will always be in washington, but lets help the working Americans voice ACTUALLY be heard. Edwards please, endorse Clinton, she is the right person to run this country. Senator Clinton has proven herself and will help the people who really make this country run (working Americans) survive and live better!

Paul   February 11th, 2008 1:07 am ET

Hillary is more in keeping with Edward's message. I would hope and certainly do expect that he is not the type to jump on a cult-like bandwagon in favor of an ill-prepared, if change-embracing candidate. Clinton-Edwards, now THERE'S ticket that would crush the GOP come November. And by the way, don't discount Hillary quite yet - I know Obama hasn't.

HILLARY 08!

Tinatruong   February 11th, 2008 1:05 am ET

America's economy is so bad at the moment. You need to choose a candidate to wake up economy (find solutions …) better than a person just talk change but change what ( from rich to poor, from black to white hehehe) Very funny.
Hillary Clinton is a lady who can find solutions for America's econmy and listen to the people's voice…..
Vote for her now,

Gil - California   February 11th, 2008 1:04 am ET

Obama/Edwards 08/12

Kash79   February 11th, 2008 1:02 am ET

This has nothing to do with Edwards Endorsement, but am I the only one who thinks CNN coverage stinks.

I think if FOX is a propaganda news- CNN has become noise. Especially- the biased coverage of Democratic primaries is a final nail in the coffin.

Blitzer reports everything as if its the end of the world, dobbs well he is well documented freak- Ironically, Cooper in vain phrases reporting to make it look unbiased.

Ironically, even after all these years, Larry King is the only tolerable show. At least he brings guests from all spectrums which eventually balances out.

CNN is a reflection of the demise of broadcast journalism in this country.

John   February 11th, 2008 1:02 am ET

Well now that Obama's swept the weekend and will most likely do so next week, I'm betting on another sit down and cry session with Hillary. "I just want to do the best thing for my countrym," well in that case you should've voted against the war in Iraq, where hundreds of good men and women have died because if ignorant egotistical views like yours.

504LA   February 11th, 2008 12:41 am ET

To Darrell, it's the other way around. She has brought specific issues with specific solutions. I've only heard him echo her issues, but falls short of specific solutions on his ownl.

jay mo   February 10th, 2008 7:26 pm ET

obama/edwards 08!

hal   February 10th, 2008 7:26 pm ET

I remember last fall whenever Edwards or any other Democratic candidate criticized Hillary (for taking PAC money for example), her campaign invariably fired back a response with this annoying formula: "John Edwards is trying to redirect attention away from his failed campaign and the fact that his message has not been well-received by the voters, as can be seen from any number of polls. Senator Clinton is demonstrating her leadership…". I guess after this weekend, the Clinton camp will have to come up with a less stereotyped response.

Ryan Rogerson   February 10th, 2008 7:26 pm ET

Obama/Edwards would be a combo that could change the country and bring our good standing back to the world stage.

Ms T.   February 10th, 2008 7:25 pm ET

Stop it.
Now you Hillary supporters know that from the beginnig Edwards had more in common with Obama and still does. Edwards should and needs to join with Obama. I don't think that Edwards should side with Hillary just because more poor people lean toward her. If this were to occur this would really be a poor excuse in my book and I am poor as well. I think that some poor people side with Hillary because of her husband but if they did the research they will find that during the 1990's more poor people were imprisioned, the welfare reform forced more poor moms to go to work for sub-minimum wage jobs and the daycare/babysitters raised the poor children and lets not forget the poor 800,000 to 1,000,000 Rwandans who died while the world watched.

Obama/Edwards 08

Molly   February 10th, 2008 7:23 pm ET

Senator Edwards, remember that in your debate you called H.C. the status quo. You said you wanted change and you stood with Obama after Iowa, now stand with us again, so we CHANGE America.

mary   February 10th, 2008 7:22 pm ET

I am from Michigan and I voted in the democratic primary and my vote doesn't count!! That is wrong!! I am an American too! It's not the fault of the Michigan and Florida voters that the states screwed up, but apparently we are taken the fall for it. So, now I don't have a say on who will be our President. If Obama feels that the super delegates should vote for the people's choice then he should feel that the Michigan and Florida residents should have their voice heard too. But, he won't fight for us because Hillary won both states!!, he won't be fair. I WANT MY VOTE TO COUNT1

Ben   February 10th, 2008 7:22 pm ET

I do not understand how any American in their right mind can expect Edwards to endorse Hillary. She carries more baggage than a freight train, is ill tempered, profane and despite all the rhetoric will allow Bill to be co president. She has flip flopped more than Kerry and lied at every turn. Is SHE the person we want representing us in this ever more dangerous world?.

S.C.   February 10th, 2008 7:22 pm ET

Come on Edwards! Endorse Obama!!!!!! I think a Obama-Edwards ticket sounds good to me! YES WE CAN! Remeber Edwards, Obama doesn't take money from lobbyists.

ben of NC   February 10th, 2008 7:22 pm ET

yes Edward can!

Tlc   February 10th, 2008 7:22 pm ET

Senator Obama is leading in the popular vote. He is leading in the delegates, aside from the supers. If Senator Edwards honestly cares about the will of the people he will endorse Senator Obama.

Chris   February 10th, 2008 7:21 pm ET

please endorse obama he inspires us the most and thats the most important thing we need because without inspiration and a nation behind you idc how much experience you have your not going to change this country and obama is the only one who has that much support

Aillyn   February 10th, 2008 7:20 pm ET

It won't make sense if he endorses Hillary. Edwards has much more in common with Obama. A lot of their views are the same. His views oppose too much with Hillary. Even the unions that were endorsing Edwards are now endorsing Obama, plus Kerry who ran with Edwards in the last election is endorsing Obama. For Edwards to endorse Hillary would make no sense at all.

Ito, Yokosuka Japan   February 10th, 2008 7:20 pm ET

Obama/Edwards sounds a whole heck of a lot better than Obama/HRC (give me the willies just writing it).

Robert, Kentucky   February 10th, 2008 7:19 pm ET

Good for Edwards. I hope he is doing well. Obama/Edwards ticket in 2008!

Henry   February 10th, 2008 7:19 pm ET

Obama - Edwards will be a winning ticket!!!! Please endorse him. Dont fall to the constant deceptions of the Clinton Machine.

jer   February 10th, 2008 7:18 pm ET

I think Edwards does not want to muddy up the waters by interjecting his endorsement until one of them has the tidal wave of momentum. Personally a lot of people are hoping he gets into either of their administrations in some manner of labor, attorney general, or vice president. I agree that after Tuesday if Barrack wins everything Edwards may endorse him. He has stayed out as a favor to Hillary to see if she could regain momentum. If she wins Virginia he may endorse Hillary.

MB   February 10th, 2008 7:18 pm ET

Obama / Edwards '08!

yns   February 10th, 2008 7:17 pm ET

I am a former Edwards supporter and I support Hillary Clinton. Edwards had much substance to his campaign. I was so sad when he suspended his campaign!

Hillary has substance in her campain! That is why I am with her now. She has answers to the tough questions. I believe that she should be our next president of the USA.

Not all of Edwards' supporters have gone to Obama. I have not and will not!

Maybe it would be better if he does not endorse at all!

Let's all take a look at the candidates and make up our own minds. It would also help if the media quit interfering and would report the facts instead of their own biased opinions!

john may   February 10th, 2008 7:17 pm ET

as a Canadian it may not politically correct to make any comment on the U.S. politrical scene. - However the fact is that what happens south of the border has a profound effect on us Canadians.
Therefore if Billary Clinton wins the Democratic we will have a personal day of mourning and if Mr Barack Obama wins we will have a personal day of celebration
- if not lobby for a national holiday.

On the other side.If John McCain wins we will run for cover… just as we did when it seems that Barry Goldwater might get elected

James   February 10th, 2008 7:17 pm ET

Great. Can not wait for Attorney General John Edwards in an Obama administration. As for Gore, I hope he throws his endorsement in for Obama this week as well.

TR   February 10th, 2008 7:17 pm ET

Hillary's campaing is funded by lobbyist, if he endorses her his bragging rights about not being affiliated with lobbyist would go flying out of the window!

He should just stay neutral and left the voters decide for themselves. Hillary already has enough help.

PS: Whatever happened to Clinton Machine??!~

Zach   February 10th, 2008 7:17 pm ET

Obama/Edwards 08, that is a great tag-team. Edwards shares the same views as Obama so he should endorse him. Hillary doesnt care about the people, she wants the win and only the win, thats why she only goes for the "large" states while Obama goes everywhere, just as Edwards would be doing. Obama '08

Steven Furtado, Kunkletown PA   February 10th, 2008 7:17 pm ET

As much as I like Obama, lets not count Edwards out just yet. This time next year, we might just be calling him Vice-President Edwards. :-)

stephan hall   February 10th, 2008 7:16 pm ET

Edwards should endorse Obama. Whether or not he will be on his ticket for vp remains to be seen but its clear by the way americans have voted so far that Obama is the way too go. Clearly the Clintons are played out and hopefully america will see this and make the right choice.
Obama is a special kind of person thats got the chance to make a real difference in the world with his fresh ideas and policies.
Obama 08!!!

BW, GA   February 10th, 2008 7:16 pm ET

Yes Edwards - pls support Obama. Obama/Edwards '08 is the ticket to The White House.

Ashley, Detroit   February 10th, 2008 7:15 pm ET

Obama/Edwards 08!!!!

abdul   February 10th, 2008 7:15 pm ET

I can't believe a word Hillary says. It sounds and looks unauthentic, even when she cries at the most opportune times (pre-new hampshire primary). She has a political stink you can't wash.

BDT   February 10th, 2008 7:15 pm ET

Obama\Edwards 08 a winning ticket for change and respect for U.S.

Hillary   February 10th, 2008 7:14 pm ET

It doesn't matter who he endorses. Obama's train will be leaving the station Tuesday after the Chesapeake primaries. Whoever refuses to jump in will be left out.

Geo.W   February 10th, 2008 7:14 pm ET

Senator Edawards, Please Don't pull a Kerry.He wanted Gerhart,and did not
endorse You.Don't do the same.
Be a WOMANIST like your wife.Endorse Hillary R Clinton who will get the changes ,you and all of us want.Not a Rookie 2 year Senator.You Can't TRUST.
I know you'll do the Right Thing.
Thank You
Always GW (former Union organizer) & Vet

douglasdao   February 10th, 2008 7:14 pm ET

In this type of political meeting, you meet with the person you are saying "no" to first, i.e. - Hillary. Edwards is meeting tomorrow with Obama, to whom he will say "yes."

Anonymous   February 10th, 2008 7:12 pm ET

Senator Edwards, please make the right decision and support Hilary.
She is the only candidate that is working hard for the American people
and her policy on the congressional health insurance is long overdue.
I think that she is right to enforce health insurance on the american people.
Isn't this the same idea as having mandatory car insurance? Many people with
Substantial insurance are broke when a family member is diagnosed with a
terminal illness. This is caused by the millions of uninsured Americans who goes
to the emergency room and are unable to pay. The people with insurance are paying
for it as a result, but when you get sick then the insurance company drops you. America is the leading country of the world but its people are in so much trouble.
Even a country such as Taiwan provides health insurance to all its people. Are we not better than taiwan? Obama is inspirational when he speaks but is he able to get the job done?Obama is promoting that he'll be change for the US ,but would this change bring improvement or diaster?

sam   February 10th, 2008 7:11 pm ET

Senator Edwards, please make the right decision and support Hilary.
She is the only candidate that is working hard for the American people
and her policy on the congressional health insurance is long overdue.
I think that she is right to enforce health insurance on the american people.
Isn't this the same idea as having mandatory car insurance? Many people with
Substantial insurance are broke when a family member is diagnosed with a
terminal illness. This is caused by the millions of uninsured Americans who goes
to the emergency room and are unable to pay. The people with insurance are paying
for it as a result, but when you get sick then the insurance company drops you. America is the leading country of the world but its people are in so much trouble.
Even a country such as Taiwan provides health insurance to all its people. Are we not better than taiwan? Obama is inspirational when he speaks but is he able to get the job done?Obama is promoting that he'll be change for the US ,but would this change bring improvement or diaster?

Tammy, Los Angeles   February 10th, 2008 7:11 pm ET

Edwards would go against all he talked about supporting lobbyists if he endorses Hillary. Also, Elizabeth Edwards was the one who convinced him to run again. I have a feeling she's convinced him to become active again. There is a reason most Edwards endorsements have gone Obama lately.

Jimmy Carter gave a silent endorsement in an article this week for Obama when he said that what Obama has done has been "extraordinary" and inspired himself and his wife.

Michael Moore gave a silent endorsement in multiple interviews this week where he mentioned an "immoral" vote to vote for Hillary when she supported giving authorization for war.

And I've also hear rumors of the Al Gore endorsement that I'm sure would be a tough one to come out. Even though they have worked so hard for each other on environmental issues.

abigi   February 10th, 2008 7:10 pm ET

LEADERSHIP IS NOT ALL ABOUT RETHORICS.

IS ABOUT TRACK RECORD AND POLICIES.

A VOTE FOR OBAMA MEANS ANOTHER 8 YRS OF REPUBLICANS IN THE WHITE HOUSE.

THIS MOVEMENT BY YOUNG VOTERS WHO ARE STILL LIVING WITH MOMMY AND DADDY WILL NOT HELP AMERICA.

HOW CAN WE AFRICAN AMERICANS TURN OUR BACKS ON THE CLINTONS?

MR.EDWARDS,DO THE RIGHT THING BY ENDORSING HILLARY.

Bill   February 10th, 2008 7:09 pm ET

Will John Edwards's endorsement really help either candidate?

Charley O'Malley   February 10th, 2008 7:09 pm ET

Barack Obama is a moving speaker and a likable guy. He is also a great Christmas gift for the Republicans! Only one Democrat has ever one the White House since 1964, Clinton. The Republicans gave Carter the White house in 1976, when Reagan and Ford fault it out to the convention. In fact, no candidate has won the white House in the last 50 years (at least) where the two candidates have duked it out till the convention, none. He was routed 4 years later. Clinton has centrist views, and could win, Obama, forget it. Not a chance. Ask Humphrey’s where all those young voters were in the general election, home not voting. Then he has the hidden racist factor, one the press doesn’t want to talk about. 5-% of the voters who claim they will vote for him won't. Ask Ford, in Tennessee. So its up to the voters, Clinton or it’s all setting up for Gore in 2012!

Kimberly Peacock   February 10th, 2008 7:08 pm ET

Figures Edwards will support Obama. They just like to get Hillary.

I dont agree with the social agenda of the republican party but I will never vote for Obama. It says the image is more important than substance.

Edwards if you had not given up,

McRumi   February 10th, 2008 7:07 pm ET

Given how Edwards kept attacking Hillary as "status quo," how could he possibly endorse her?? Would seem deeply hypocritical.

Jf   February 10th, 2008 7:07 pm ET

Think for a minute, of our country as a very large bus, that we are all riding on down a road. The bus has been driven really hard the last 7yrs, and almost nothing has been spent on her maintenance during that time. Her tires are almost bald, her brakes are failing, and there is almost nothing left in the fuel tank… Up just ahead, there is a fork in the road. At that fork there is a sign. On that sign is an arrow pointing one way that says “Full service gas station just ahead”, and an arrow pointing the other way that just says “A new direction”… Which way would you want the bus to go?

I can only hope that John Edwards will try to convince people that we need to get the bus serviced BEFORE we head down that “A new direction” road.

I believe that road will still be there in 4 or 8yrs, and at that time, when the bus is road worthy again, if that sign is still up, I’d be happy to see what’s down “A new direction” road.

Steve   February 10th, 2008 7:06 pm ET

ALL the momentum is going Obama's way. So just let that fresh breeze pick you up, John, and join the chorus! Some one has got to convice the Party fuddy duddies (i.e. "Super"delegates) to not stand in the way of the public will–Change Can't Wait–Obama in '08! "We are the ones we've been waiting for…"

Voter   February 10th, 2008 7:06 pm ET

It just amazes me how much people to support someone so willing to divide the nation with red and blue lines again. Edwards just wants to help the people like Obama does. If either one is getting an endorsement then it's Obama.

Isabel   February 10th, 2008 7:05 pm ET

Clinton/Edwards would be more ideal. John would have the responsibility to check on Clinton's scruples.

Violet Cauthon   February 10th, 2008 7:05 pm ET

I voted for John Edwards in our state's caucus via absentee ballot. That was, of course, before he suspended his campaign. Edwards has policities closest to my political stance and I fervently hope he influences Clinton or Obama to fight for his ideas. I also don't see him accepting Vice-President but I would really, really like to see John Edwards as Attorney General over the decimated Department of Justice. I could see John Edwards cleaning house of the Bush evangelical law students and the other right-wing idealogues hired by Ashcroft and Gonzales. I could see John Edwards being the housecleaning Attorney General for the United States. With him over Justice, maybe Conyers, Leahy, Levin et al would finally, FINALLY receive the information they've requested from the Bush White House over and over again.

James   February 10th, 2008 7:04 pm ET

Sen. Edwards,

I think many of agree that Obama/Edwards is not only representative of the direction we would like to see the nation move towards, but is a very strong, electable ticket as well.

That said, I ask that you endorse Sen. Obama irrespective of if you are asked to be his running-mate or not, because it is what's best for the country.

Thank you.

jim davis   February 10th, 2008 7:04 pm ET

if clinton is the nominee this will be the first time in 40yrs. i will not vote. bush 4ys clinton 8ys. bush 8ys. what does these people think we are stupid/? the clintons were behind going to court to stop the vote in nv. i made the mistake of voteing for our gov. here im mi. against my better judgement i thought we needed a female in office. my mistake. now she is crying about mi. and fl. being counted everyone knew what the rules were going in now she wants to change the rules on that how can i support someone like that. never happen; sounds like bush to me.

Michelle in KS   February 10th, 2008 7:02 pm ET

OBAMA/EDWARDS is my dream ticket!

An Al Gore endorsement can't hurt either…what a slap in the face from the former VP to his President…..

Rich in Seattle   February 10th, 2008 7:02 pm ET

Hillary is the establishment, if he wants what is best for the "regular folks" he knows who he needs to support. The choice is obvious.

Carol   February 10th, 2008 7:02 pm ET

If you watched the debate in which Edwards aligned himself with Obama
as agents of change, as opposed to Clinton as a voice of the past,
one wonders why this is an issue at all — unless Edwards is less
direct and honest than we thought…

rlkidd   February 10th, 2008 7:02 pm ET

I hope John Edwards endorses Obama, perhaps running as vice president.
New blood in the white house, not the same old political hacks.

John Harrington   February 10th, 2008 7:02 pm ET

please endorse hillary!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ur health care and other policies are exactly the same
GO HILLARY!!!!!
GO EDWARDS!!!!!!

Love Hill   February 10th, 2008 7:02 pm ET

He was part this 2008 campaign. If he needs to discuss with Hillary and Obama before deciding who to endorse, that tells us a lot about him.
He is bargaining his support. That is so cheap of him. What else does Edward need to know about Hillary and Obama ???

Naushad   February 10th, 2008 7:01 pm ET

I hope Mr.Edward choose the right candidate for Democrats. I like Mr.Obama but I
believe he needs some maturity both in US and outside of this country. We had one naive G. Bush and look wher it took this country. This country right now does not only need hopes but also needs a leader who is connected with real world outside US. I must admit it is tough to ignore Mr.Obama but this is a crucialmoment for this country and unfortunately Mr.Obama is not ready yet. He is also supported by two proven losers in De.Party named Kerry and Kennedy. It makes me love when Democrats criticizes Bill Clinton.I just want to politely remind the Democrats that Bill Clinton is the only success story Democrats have in last 25 years. I believe Bill is more black than any other black candidates I have ever seen including loser Kerry and Kennedy.

Jordan, New York   February 10th, 2008 7:01 pm ET

Hillary's a great candidate. She's been a phenomenal senator for the state of New York, and she'll continue to be a phenomenal senator for us. However, It's time that the Democratic Party recognizes the new direction that we're moving. Obama is racking up win after win by ENORMOUS margins (today's Maine caucuses were supposed to be close, they weren't). If we're going to prevent the party from being fractured, we need to start coming together NOW. We need Edwards (and Gore and Bill) to put their weight and credibility behind the more popular candidate. We need to preserve the enthusiasm that Obama has instilled in the party. We can't let it deteriorate with the relentless politicking that's characterized the Clinton campaign thus far.

Sistah   February 10th, 2008 7:01 pm ET

Hmmm…..Mrs. Edwards and her pals like Obama. As you may forget, when Mr. Edwards was trying to get a word in at the debate, BILLARY was the main one bickering.

Now her campaign manager is NO MORE - but at least BILL has quieted down and let her fight her own battles (without the crocodile tears).

By the way, isn't Obama winning Maine today and the everything in the next two weeks? ;)

He'll get OHIO too! I'm from there and the Plain Dealer is endorsing him as well many others.

Obama '08 and '12

Anonymous   February 10th, 2008 7:01 pm ET

Clinton is a better candidate than Obama with much experience. I am confused why people don't see this!!
But then again…alot of people voted for Bush to be back in the office.

Edwards should not endorse anyone. But if he must….Clinton is the best person for it.

HILLRY 08!!!

Maria Dafaxina   February 10th, 2008 7:01 pm ET

BARACK for me is like coffe and milk, i can not start may day without it! I wil vote Obama for may childrens, for may parentes and for The United States of America!!!!!!!!!!!!

Deogwon   February 10th, 2008 7:01 pm ET

The only reason I could see Edwards either not endorsing Obama or staying neutral is if he wants Clinton to pick him as her running mate because if you look at the issues, Edwards has a lot more in common with Obama than he does with Clinton. Edwards and Obama stand for change. I was a supporter of Edwards in 2004, and I was shocked that voters picked Kerry over him, but I will be even more shocked if Edwards picks Clinton over Obama.

Rick   February 10th, 2008 7:00 pm ET

Mr Edwards if tiy are really an agent for change and really want to see your programs evolve into something workable then you need to endorse Mr Obama. His influence with the young is what is going to change America and Washington for the best. If you choose Hillary then you are no better than the rest of the Staus Quo and Washington. Do the RIGHT THING, choose to change the STATUS QUO and vote for Obama………………

Marc, WSU   February 10th, 2008 7:00 pm ET

Al Gore is on the boards of Apple, won the Nobel Peace Prize and has his hands full outside of Politics. He's being intelligent by staying out of the political elections.

TSR   February 10th, 2008 7:00 pm ET

Hey Kat i thought Hillary was always over the top to start with. Rewind three months ago and no one gave Obama achance to beat her . How ironic that you are begging the same man to help her that was critizing every thing he stood for in the debates.Americans have great memories

Charles   February 10th, 2008 7:00 pm ET

Finally, United state and its greatness are on the same side again, This is really the beginning of rebuilding the lost wonderful name we once heard.
Smart Americans are voting for Obama.

aware   February 10th, 2008 6:59 pm ET

It is too early. John Edwards needs to remain neutral!

Hillary the Hope of 08 :)

marge   February 10th, 2008 6:59 pm ET

"Yes! Come on Senator Edwards PLEASE make the right decision and support HIllary. She is the best person for the job and we need you to help put her (us) over the top. She can bring the changes you and so many of us want.
Hillary 08″

Keep on dreaming!!!!! Did you watch any of the debates when Edwards was in the race? He would be one of the biggest Hypocrites in history if he endorsed Hillary!
Manadory contributions to her health care plan is a change Americans can live without!
Wonder how much these Billary supporters are going to "love" her when she starts going after their wages????

Brad, Columbia, S.C.   February 10th, 2008 6:59 pm ET

I'm sure North Carolina is the last place Obama wants to be Monday, on the eve of a very big primary trifecta.

I wonder who set that date. If it was Edwards, surely he must have known that's bad timing, even though Obama would not turn down the invitation for risk of letting an endorsement slip away. If Obama set the date, well, I'd be very surprised. Unless that means an Edwards endorsement were to come sometime Monday.

Either way, I still believe Edwards is holding back until a front-runner is established. I think he very much wants to be VP and doesn't want to burn any bridges.

But anyway, I see Obama-Edwards as anything but a slam dunk. Especially against McCain, don't you think Obama would do well to pick someone with more experience and credentials than Edwards, himself nearly as green as Obama? How a senior Democrat with strong foreign policy/security bona fides? (I was about to say Wesley Clark, but he's already endorsed Clinton …)

Hopemonger in NYC   February 10th, 2008 6:58 pm ET

I really hope Edwards endorses Obama, I know that in my circle of friends without exception every single person that was an Edwards supporter turned their support to Obama after Edwards suspended his campaign. It seems like a no brainer. I mean how can you run a campaign on the need for change in Washington and getting lobbyists out of the political process and then endorse Hillary Clinton who everyone knows is beholden to those same interests. Also, I have personally seen the way that Obama's call to service and his call to be better Americans has engaged people in caring more for those in need and struggling in this country. I mean the day after Super Tuesday, there was post after post on the Barack Obama web site not about the election results but about how to make donations to the Red Cross to help people in the tornado ravaged areas (all made in honor of Senator Obama). My 2 cents.

Bubba   February 10th, 2008 6:58 pm ET

I like Edwards and think that he was entertaining during some of the debates - he always knew how to ruffle Clinton and Obama's feathers. With that being said, it is still clearly way too early for him to announce any endorsement. I am all for an Obama - Edwards ticket, but he should wait.

In 'Fade In' magazine when Oliver Stone interviewed him, he said that he would not run as a vice president to any of the candidates - which I found funny, as we will see him go back on that shortly.

Obama '08!

RobinH   February 10th, 2008 6:58 pm ET

I respect Sen. Clinton experience, drive and intelligence, but Senator Obama's experience in the real world, as a community organizer, as well as his ethics and his electability make him a better choice for Democrats. His ability to expand the party means coat-tails for every down-ticket race, from the Congress to local school board.

Voters with time and inclination should read his Blueprint for Change, 59 pages of small font, nitty gritty, specific policies to make America stronger and better. The first two pages are devoted to 15 specific ethics reforms that would reduce the influence of big-moneyed special interests on DC decision making This is the 'type of change we can believe in' the type of legacy that outlives any presidency.

Anna   February 10th, 2008 6:57 pm ET

Wouldn't it be hypocritical for Edwards to endorse Obama since he wants universal health care, like Clinton and unlike Obama?

jeffrey   February 10th, 2008 6:57 pm ET

For Senataor Edwards PLEASE……PLEASE endorse Barrarck Obama, he is the best to lead America. He can put back America to its golden time.

xavier   February 10th, 2008 6:56 pm ET

PK:

Given that Obama has more states, more votes, and more pledged delegates, how can you make the statement that more people vote for Hillary? that doesn't even make sense. If you represent the people that support her then she has already lost.

Beverley   February 10th, 2008 6:56 pm ET

I respect John Edwards a lot. And although I never thought he'd get far with his poverty platform - it was a honorable campaign. I think John Edwards is very smart! He can't possibly think that Hillary is the future (if anything her experience should be packaged as a quick fix) - Obama and democrats like him are the future.

Democrats are not Republicans! While the Republicans are trying to make McCain bend over and submit - Democrats like ex-republican Jim Webb, Heath Shuler and Barak Obama are doing what is best for the country - not the party!

I'm glad he met with both camps - I hope he gets some concessions. I'm glad he didn't endorse before super tuesday, because that's when the bulk of the country and the nominee should be able to win on their own merit not an endorsement - But over half of the states have voted and this is an appropriate time to hear from Edwards because he does represent a portion of the voters!

Maria   February 10th, 2008 6:56 pm ET

I like Senator Edwards, and I know that there is tough pressure on both sides for an endorsement, but it is clear that Senator Obama has a stronger message and during debates, the two of them sided together much more often.

I'm a New Yorker who agrees that it should be Obama/Edwards 08!

Maddie   February 10th, 2008 6:55 pm ET

John - Please throw your endorsement to Sen. Barack Obama, a smart, gifted visionary that has breathed hope into a nation hungry for change.. He is the Kennedy of the younger generation, a generation that will become completely disenfranchised if and when backroom politics, something machine Democrats are so good at, cause "fixers" to lean on the Super Delegates to elect Sen. Hillary Clinton. We need a fresh outlook! We need to look forward.

pam Eugene OR   February 10th, 2008 6:55 pm ET

Look at the momentum for Obama John. He is our future and Hillary is our past. I don't know what each of them is promising you but please see what is best for all Americans. We need a pick a candidate very soon and start to work against McCain now. A brokered conference would be terrible for all democrats. The Clinton years are over and for good reasons. She is way too too divisive and has far too many negatives to unite the people.One half of the country hates her, not a mild dislike, a total hatred of her.
If you can not endorser Barack please don't say anything.

Alex K   February 10th, 2008 6:55 pm ET

YES WE CAN
end Clintonian corruption

YES WE CAN
end Clintonian deception

YES WE CAN
end Clintonian lies

WE LOVE OBAMA
in New York City!

Ellen   February 10th, 2008 6:54 pm ET

Hillary Clinton is the most qualified to put our dreams into action. It would be great to have Edwards endorsement. She really has worked all her life to improve the lives of people who are not as advantaged as some of us.
As for Obama and the lobbyists — I'm from Illinois and believe me that's a new thing. Last night he bragged about being from Chicago and knowing how to do politics the Chicago way. Hmmmmm
I remember being young and wanting everything right now but this time I think we need someone with both dreams and experience. Hillary Clinton has already worked through the theory Obama is just thinking about. She will take us where we want to go.
Good Luck to all of us.

Ricky   February 10th, 2008 6:53 pm ET

Wow, your decision can carry a lot of weight but only if you choose the right person. You are torment to choose between your mother and your bother. Which one will it be the future or past?

Matt   February 10th, 2008 6:53 pm ET

He will endorse Obama, the smart choice. The only choice, really.

Hillary's time is up.

Salz   February 10th, 2008 6:52 pm ET

He should endorse Obama. He's more well-rounded, and is now pulling in huge votes. Join the Cause, Edwards. Change, we believe in it!

Jean   February 10th, 2008 6:52 pm ET

I think Clinton would be better at fullfilling any deals made with Edwards because she's a more intelligent, experienced politician .

The Youth in NC   February 10th, 2008 6:52 pm ET

Speaking for the youth. The future of this country lies with the youth. The youth are mesmorized by Obama. Invest in the youth by endorsing Obama. Not only that, all of the polls indicate that Obama would make the best candidate against Mccain, or any one else. An endorsement for Clinton would keep things the same, a vote for Obama will bring about change. Do what is right.
Obama 08!!!

Terrell Newkirk CA   February 10th, 2008 6:52 pm ET

Edwards will make the right decision and support the surge of Obama.

Go Obama/Edwards or Obama/Clintion 08.

AJ, IL   February 10th, 2008 6:51 pm ET

Edwards should have endorsed Obama before Super Tuesday Feb. 5th when he had the chance to look authentic. Since some superdelegates have already left the Edwards camp for Obama, I don't think his endorsement will carry much weight. The real question is what position is Edwards jocking for. I don't think he should be on the VP ticket. It needs to be someone new and currently in an elected office who shares Obama's view of change and was and still is against the Iraq War.

Obama in '08!

unreal   February 10th, 2008 6:50 pm ET

so sad cnn needs help

rabblerouser   February 10th, 2008 6:50 pm ET

It's not over yet - but I do wonder how things would have worked out if the media hadn't run a relentless smear campaign against Clinton. There's some force (and it's not the people) that wants Obama to get this nomination. I'm not sure why or who they are, but the media reflects this and has consistently been out to get Hillary from the outset. It makes me realize that we the people really don't choose our leaders, we just think we do…

John Edwards should support Clinton because he is a champion of the poor and so is she. What we don't need is four years of on the job training.

Betty   February 10th, 2008 6:50 pm ET

CNN seems very slanted toward Clinton. Luckily, the country is in favor of Obama.

MARIA 2325   February 10th, 2008 6:50 pm ET

Edwards knows who is the best for the job ,Obama is a good speaker and I do not believe he will do what he promises , he does not show his plans. I can compare with a president in South America , He was young and offered a lot , his speeches were like Obama, when he was in the govenment , led the country the worst inflation . Hilary is a smart woman with experience and a good work plan

AMP   February 10th, 2008 6:49 pm ET

You people (Obama supporters) have lost your minds! Even if Hillary Clinton didn't pick up another delegate from here out, she has almost HALF of the delegates needed for nomination as I type, so the Obama/Edwards ticket is TRULY funny! Your guy is going to get exposed SOON enough for selling you guys nothing but smoke!

Cherish   February 10th, 2008 6:49 pm ET

Hillary is the status quo candidate - if Edwards endorses her, I wouldn't be more surprised if I woke up with my head sewn to the carpet.

All this Gore/Edwards Obama endorsement talk is enough to keep a smile on my face all the way to Texas & Ohio! (knock on wood.)

Did you know four major Texas newspapers have endorsed Sen. Obama?!

Together, we can. Together, we will.

Obama '08!!!

Sherry in Kentucky   February 10th, 2008 6:49 pm ET

Not that CNN will post this. . . and not that John Edwards bothers to read the CNN blogs. . . but if you are reading this. . . Please endorse Barack. We need to unite the party against McCain. Hillary will divide us.

cj from seattle   February 10th, 2008 6:49 pm ET

Only Obama could get his endoresment. Hillary's whole campaign conflicts with Edward's platform of change from the status quo. And as Billary put it herself she has been part of the washington machine for 35 years (and if that is not status quo I do not know what is). I think Eddy wil endorse Obama after this upcoming tuesday, it will build on his momentum and will help him in texas ohio and pennslyvannia where he desperetly needs to do well. Momentum is everything. And I think Hillary is knows it wil soon be over (but not after a bitter fight). And I think it would be odd for gore to step back in the political arena (it would sure help obama, but endorsing his running mate's wife's enemy takes gusto, but then again look at Kerry…).

Sally   February 10th, 2008 6:49 pm ET

If Edwards is so worried about the poor people as he says he is, he certainly will endorse Hillary Clinton, but if he is more worried about a position that Obama may give him, as I heard talk before about Edwards being Attorney General if Obama is elected, then he will vote Obama. His ideas are so close to Hillary's when it comes to the poor and they both had the same Healthcare plan, I don't know why he would even have a hard time deciding on who he should endorse. We shall see which is of the most importance to him.

Lcf   February 10th, 2008 6:47 pm ET

I am commenting to CNN about the coverage today and how very obviously slanted it is toward Clinton. Ms. Crowley's coverage today was obviously pro Clinton.
Also, Fox is reporting another number with delegates than CNN-CNN more slanted toward Clinton. I think it's pretty sad that Obama was behind by less than 100 votes before yesterdays races, but now is behind by 133 according to CNN-if that continues, I as a democrat and many more will stay home and become discouraged for November and you can guarantee a Republican win.

Narian   February 10th, 2008 6:47 pm ET

Yes! Come on Senator Edwards PLEASE make the right decision and support Obama. He is the best person for the job and we need you to help put him (us) over the top. He can bring the changes you and so many of us want.
Obama '08

Trey   February 10th, 2008 6:46 pm ET

Edwards will endorse Hilliary.

If he doesn't he is showing how phony he is.

Remember Hilliary and Edwards have basically the same positions on healthcare….

NT   February 10th, 2008 6:45 pm ET

I hope he endorses Obama. We need a new perspective in Washington. Obama also brings in so many young people into the process.

Bree   February 10th, 2008 6:44 pm ET

I don't understand why Clinton supporters' primary argument for her is that "she can bring about the change"….so what? As if Obama can't??? He seems to me to be much stronger and have a much more balanced and clear head on his shoulders. Look at the coalition he has built in just this campaign alone!! The man is certainly capable of action as well as inspiring a nation and uniting a people. I cannot fathom not supporting him.

Chris   February 10th, 2008 6:44 pm ET

Edwards is a smart guy, he will go for the obvious winning team. Contrary to popular opinion, the ability to inspire is a more precious presidential quality than having spen 8 years in the white house next to the guy who had the ability to inspire.

Yes We Can!

Ryan   February 10th, 2008 6:43 pm ET

Edwards always struck me as being a man of principle, which is why I have so much respect for him. I hope he goes with the candidate that represents his views and doesn't follow the hype of a rockstar. If he wants to give the goals of his candidacy any chance, he'll throw his support to Hillary.

Carol   February 10th, 2008 6:43 pm ET

I was just listening to the NBC evening news. They reported that Barack Obama was meeting with John Edwards, but they said nothing about meeting with Hillary Clinton. Barack Obama has been made by the media, he is not President material, at this point. It's so sad that the country likes someone for President,who does not even have a platform.

Bree   February 10th, 2008 6:42 pm ET

"Most of the poor people vote for (Clinton)"…that is not necessarily true. Wealthier democrats seem to be more likely to vote for obama, but that doesn't mean most do and it certainly doesn't mean that most poor people do not. Don't skew statistics.

SH- Alabama   February 10th, 2008 6:42 pm ET

We need Edwards in the next government. Let him endorse the one that will put him on their ticket.

richard   February 10th, 2008 6:41 pm ET

Actually I have heard reliable rumor of Gore enorsing Hillary. Main complaint is the junior senator Obama has no experiance in several main issues.

Facts and opinions gathered on the net.

Hey Obama please release the following documents please:
- Your Columbia University Transcripts. (has refused so far)
- A list of your friends, roommates and bosses during your time in New York. By the way this is required for a security clearance. (has refused so far)
- Documents regarding your time in the Illinois Senate. (Obama refused and now says the documents were lost)
- The documents concerning your house purchase and the purchase of the lot next door and the subsequent purchase of part of that lot by you.
- A document showing how you handled the "gift" from Rezcko on your house purchase. (If not on your tax return during the year you purchased your house then you have violated federal law?
- A list of the people who have bundled your contributions, including any money from overseas sources.
- A transcript of the conversations that you had as a sitting U.S. Senator with Railla Odinga while he was running for the presidency of foreign government( Kenya).
- An explanation of your wherabouts during the period Nov 3 through Nov 8, 1999, while a State Senator from Illinois.
It seems lots of folks make judgment without researhing information first. Senator Clinton made lots of money on her book…and is still recieving royalties. She was paid over 8 million and certainly has other resources. The deal with the uranium mine…if you had done your research..would have shown President Clinton said ..no..to any involvment. That is the part the press doesnt tell. Check out Media Matters. I dont think most of Hillary's supporters realized she was short of money…and once they knew…the donations came in. Senator Obama asks for donations all the time. Senator Clinton and her husband never recieved any money from Rezko. Senator Obama's main contributor from the beginning of his career has been Rezko. Rezko also has close ties with Auchi…who has been found guilty by of deals relating to nuclear plants in Iraq. That makes Obama three times removed from that situation. Auchi is the reason Rezko is in jail now…due to flight risk. Check sites out about Rezko. Rezko also contributed funds to George W Bush. You can say…well…Clintons' had Hue. Some differences….Hue got his money from big investors. Obama got his money from misuse of taxpayers funds. Rezko said he couldnt pay for the heat in the buildings in Chicago. People going without heat in a Chicago winter? Chicago gets cold. During that time…Rezko gives a thousand dollars to Obama for his political career. I find it hard to believe that Obama didnt know about these conditions in his district…when the City Of Chicago was taking Rezko to court for this. Obama wrote a letter of recommendation for Rezko to get funding for his housing. Those letters are available to see at a website …taylor marsh. They have government heading on them. You cant tell me that Obama didnt know that Rezko was under federal investigation when he go a deal with him to buy his house. Check it out. Senator Obama hasnt been that honest about all of this.

Come on sheeple this is BIG media and the republican walking you into a trap. Edwards supporters it was BIG media that made him have to drop out. It is BIG media that gives Obama legs with there love fest. We are being divided. He is a good speaker, but when the lights fade and the arena empties the good speker will be all alone. Do the research people. Don’t be tricked again.

paul b moyer   February 10th, 2008 6:41 pm ET

Edwards best bet is to back Clinton if he ever wants to be President in the future .
It's quite evident that the afroamerican communty forgot who surported them in the past , Obama is an exciting candidate but when the vote is 70-80% this clearly is a prejudicial vote.

david birmingham, alabama   February 10th, 2008 6:40 pm ET

as a former Edwards supporter who voted for Obama on February 5th, I would love to see him endorse Obama. Hillary Clinton offers us only a slightly better vision of the future than do the Raepublicans. Barack Obama is the future. The contrast between young, vibrant Obama and old warmonger McCain will make this a much easier victory for the Dems. Can't fathom Hillary adding states that Kerry didn't win in 2004; I can however see Obama doing this.

joe   February 10th, 2008 6:37 pm ET

SENATOR EDWARDS

IF YOU REALLY ARE FOR THE WORKING PEOPLE..

YOU SHOULD SUPPORT SENATOR CLINTON

LISTEN TO YOUR HEART

anonymous   February 10th, 2008 6:36 pm ET

Edwards, it would be good for all of us including yourself and your political career to support Barack Obama.

Larry Judge   February 10th, 2008 6:35 pm ET

The CNN political team keeps saying this presidential contest is not about race, but it is quite apparent from most of the team's commentary that they keep playing the race card in all of their comments. I also do not feel that coverage of the two democratic candidates is equal. It is quite evident that this is an Obama newsteam.

Laura   February 10th, 2008 6:33 pm ET

Edwards is too late, he should of come out before Super Tuesday. He's been gone a long time in the world of politics. He wasted his endorsement by not doing it sooner.

Ann   February 10th, 2008 6:30 pm ET

I sure hope that John Edwards does not endorse Obama..
I have spent all day reading today, I have yet a clear picture of
anything that this man has done…so he wrote a book, he first
voted in the Senate in March of 2005, is that possible? That is
the extent of his political career? And…he's running for President?

What is wrong with the people in this country that they
are persuaded by a bunch of dreams and ideals… none of
which have ever been acted upon by this man?

I am starting to get a picture here of someone with almost
no experience who is being pushed onward by some sort
of "cult" type hype from the Internet..

I am shocked and concerned…

I guess if you can "talk the talk" you can just about pe