Feeling the heat from the Clinton camp? Shame on you CNN.

Its hard to belive, obama got this far with no experience — just 2004 he got elected Senate and also Delivered keynote address- Nothing else ….he can inspire but dont you think we need more than this

Obam's whole campaign is based on nothing but hype and fluff..

———-

Hillary is just playing the game to get as many votes as she can. She'll say anything to get elected. Just as Bill said he didn't sleep with that woman, but we all know he did. He didn't inhale either lol.

so true.

What bothers me is that this constitutes a special announcement. And why, for that matter, is it news when Hillary promotes it, but not when Barack does?

I am a fan of Obama's but I find some of the comments by those supporting him here a bit ridiculous. Cut Hillary some slack–both candidates pander from time to time, and Obama is certainly not infallible. Pretending he is helps no one.

Once again Hillary at her best promising everything just to get nominated...

A president needs to play by the rules, be honest and forthright...which
is Obama

At this point anything you say about someone's ability to lead is just speculation, saying "Obama is too inexperienced" is really "I think Obama is too inexperienced", which is fine for you to think, but to phrase in absolutes is childish. Clinton is a worthy choice, Obama is a worthy choice. Now take off the bibs and sit with the grownups, act nice and think about what you want o say.

To get the DC vote, they'd have to add one from Utah (R). She will fight to get the DC vote WITHOUT THAT, and she'll be in the same old Clinton stalemate for 4 years.

Getting an extra vote and also giving the GOP one sounds like compromise... smart compromise, and that's an OBAMA platform concept – not hers.

His compromising and unity are your only hope, DC. Don't be fooled by her smoke and mirrors.

Although she's been in Washington now for 16 years–how often did she raise her voice for DC voting rights before? This sounds like a base pander.

You guys (and every other Obama-bot commenting on this post) are simply wrong regarding Hillary's position on DC voting rights. Bill Clinton promoted DC voting rights as has Hillary. The most recent example is the S.1257 DC voting rights bill introduced by Joe Liberman in May of last year. Hillary voted for this bill as did Obama. Hillary has promoted DC voting rights for several years. Obama is late to the party but he too is in favor...or at least he voted for S.1257.

Obama's support for drivers licenses for illegals is pandering. He did not have a strong position on this topic until he was pushed for a straight answer in one of the televised debates by Tim Russert. His concern is not so much with hit and run issues but with trying to build some sort of record with the Hispanic community. He would have none otherwise. He selectively is promoting this position too. It was not part of his campaign in SC. Obama in no way has "pushed" this reform on the Senate floor.

For Anna from Missouri,

If you want to follow the DNC rules and dismiss the voters from MI and FL, you should not in any way then endorse that the rules be CHANGED to force super delegates to vote in alignment with their states. You will abide by the rules won't you.

Obama may have been a good president in the 60s, but this is NOT the 60s anymore. We need a strong, dependable person who can get this country back on track.....and Hillary is the one to do it!

Hillary 08

Jan

When Bill Clinton first entered office, D.C. had full voting representation in the House. Two years later, when Newt and Co. took over the House, it was taken away. Until a constitutional amendment is ratified, it is the House that decides voting representation for D.C. However, if the sitting President and House are from the same party, the President has considerable influence. It was at this point (~1995) that D.C. issued the "Taxation Without Representation" vehicle plates, and Bill Clinton ordered them placed on White House vehicles. To say that the Clintons did not work for D.C. representation is incorrect.

I became a Hillary supporter after the Iowa caucus, when she said in an interview that "it was my fault. I take responsibility" for the poor showing in Iowa. THAT is leadership. The last President or candidate utter those words was Ronald Reagan. I have yet to hear Obama take responsibility for any of his poor finishes, or any other issue.

An interesting development being reported. Republicans in Virginia are planning to vote for Hillary Clinton! Since most believe McCain will receive the Republican nomination, that some of the polls suggest a close Obama-McCain race, and that McCain has a slight edge over Hillary, the thought is that support for Hillary in tomorrow's primary benefits McCain. (In Virginia, voters can vote in either the Democratic or Republican primary.)

Whatever the reason, call or e-mail your Virginia friends and have them vote for Hillary!

The nine C's of leadership include: creative, communication, character, courage, conviction, charisma, competent, common sense, and crisis.

Only one of the nine C's of leadership that relates to experience – competent. I think Obama wins hands in almost all of the other areas. Competent is something that should be a given at this point – but it takes a lot more to be a leader!!!

As far as crisis – no body knows for sure how either of them will act in a crisis – but with strong character, courage, and conviction known – that probably give us a pretty good idea.

Go Obama '08

Has louder DB in sound with many backers does not make the change good for this country. We can not take another chance, we just can not afford another change without clear vision. Hilliary Clinton does show her clear vision for put this country on track. Make American to be proud again!

GOOD LUCK HILLARY – WE'LL ALL WIN IF YOU WIN.

I won’t try for fake evenhandedness here: most of the venom I see is coming from supporters of Mr. Obama, who want their hero or nobody. I’m not the first to point out that the Obama campaign seems dangerously close to becoming a cult of personality. We’ve already had that from the Bush administration — remember Operation Flight Suit? We really don’t want to go there again.

What’s particularly saddening is the way many Obama supporters seem happy with the application of “Clinton rules” — the term a number of observers use for the way pundits and some news organizations treat any action or statement by the Clintons, no matter how innocuous, as proof of evil intent.

The prime example of Clinton rules in the 1990s was the way the press covered Whitewater. A small, failed land deal became the basis of a multiyear, multimillion-dollar investigation, which never found any evidence of wrongdoing on the Clintons’ part, yet the “scandal” became a symbol of the Clinton administration’s alleged corruption.

Enjoy,

GO HILLARY
HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT

Please give us all 'in detail', a breakdown of Hilary's experience that you've drawn reference to?

C'mon give us an education and compare it side-by-side to Obama ... we're waiting.

Note: Don't bother to mention the 8 years as first lady, unless you figure that Laura Bush is a suitable Presidential candidate.

... waiting eagerly.

Insurance is one area that the Republicans have promoted corporations that allows them to make huge profits off the health of people. Insurance to provide health care to humanity should not be on the stock market. This action has greatly increased insurance premiums. Insurance companies will not agree to losses. If their profit margins are threatened by any reduction, they simply raise premiums and take away benefits. I have attended meetings at insurance companies that consistently have a theme to continue huge increases in a specific timeline.

You can thank President Reagan; he had the idea to use stock markets to offset the cost of Medicare that did not work out. Instead, insurance companies developed stock markets on health insurance to make huge profits in the stock market and fatten the pockets of their CEOs. This should be a crime!

Watch the debates, listen to the speeches....

Hillary knows what she is talking about.
Obama repeats what she says.

Hillary has exact details to what she plans
Obama flounders in his attempt to answer

Anyone can stand up and repeat CHANGE, CHANGE, CHANGE – Don't be blinded by smoke and mirrors and see that Obama is NOT the right man at the right time. We were stupid enough to vote for Bush...don't make the same mistake and be blinded by someone who can preach and say a couple of words that make him sound like he knows what he is talking about. Listen to what they are both saying.....then tell me who makes sense...then tell me who has ideas that are of substance and not just a man holding a mic – screaming for you to believe in CHANGE> I dont know about you but how can I vote for Obama when he has yet to explain what the changes he will be making are. He talks about experience and without contest Clinton has more.

Watch the debates, Listen to what they are saying.......He isn't saying much!

experience,experience,experience......... (IN WHAT NOW?!)

oh, here you go...

whine, whine, whine,whine,whine

wait a minute...

cry,cry,cry,cry,cry