<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clinton wins New Mexico Democratic caucuses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/</link>
	<description>All politics, all the time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:07:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: true democrat</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544875</link>
		<dc:creator>true democrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 03:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544875</guid>
		<description>if a caucuses  do not matter,  why are you obamites so happy?  listen, obama needs to win blue state to win a presidency, and you need to be a true dem to see, change is progressive and difficult, not popular and dream filled.  c&#039;mon democrates, we have everything on the line, let momma fix things, sonny has a lot to learn yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if a caucuses  do not matter,  why are you obamites so happy?  listen, obama needs to win blue state to win a presidency, and you need to be a true dem to see, change is progressive and difficult, not popular and dream filled.  c'mon democrates, we have everything on the line, let momma fix things, sonny has a lot to learn yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaby</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544874</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 03:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544874</guid>
		<description>That slight win in NM means less for HIllary, and still a greater return for Obama. 


Go OBAMA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That slight win in NM means less for HIllary, and still a greater return for Obama. </p>
<p>Go OBAMA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Independent</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544865</link>
		<dc:creator>Independent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 03:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544865</guid>
		<description>Is CNN trying to to pull another Florida for Hillary? Why is this news? Didn&#039;t everyone know the NM race was 49-48 and the delegates divided almost evenly? Is this super tuesday win supposedly reported a week later supposed to somehow slow Obama&#039;s momentum and help Hillary&#039;s image? Who at CNN makes these decisions? Has it really gotten this bad? Wow!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is CNN trying to to pull another Florida for Hillary? Why is this news? Didn't everyone know the NM race was 49-48 and the delegates divided almost evenly? Is this super tuesday win supposedly reported a week later supposed to somehow slow Obama's momentum and help Hillary's image? Who at CNN makes these decisions? Has it really gotten this bad? Wow!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544850</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 03:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544850</guid>
		<description>Trading beer for wine - good for you - you got the message posted - I tried 5 times and CNN blew all 5 away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trading beer for wine &#8211; good for you &#8211; you got the message posted &#8211; I tried 5 times and CNN blew all 5 away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oscar Carter</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544844</link>
		<dc:creator>Oscar Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 03:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544844</guid>
		<description>If people are really for change, please consider Mr. Obama over Ms. Clinton.  It is so clear to me being for change that Mr. Obama is the right choice.

And this idea that he does not have the experience, I know from experience that experience is overrated.  (please excuse the pun)

Oscar Carter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If people are really for change, please consider Mr. Obama over Ms. Clinton.  It is so clear to me being for change that Mr. Obama is the right choice.</p>
<p>And this idea that he does not have the experience, I know from experience that experience is overrated.  (please excuse the pun)</p>
<p>Oscar Carter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deann</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544836</link>
		<dc:creator>Deann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 03:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544836</guid>
		<description>I would project that, if democratic has paying the race vs. gender, the next president should belong to republican; the history has told us the fact...

democratic party should stop this, to look at a candidate qualification, should review that person&#039;s history, background, the experience, as a human, they need nine months to proceed then to grow up, nothing can jump up without taken this step, if not, it must fail, it is fairy tale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would project that, if democratic has paying the race vs. gender, the next president should belong to republican; the history has told us the fact...</p>
<p>democratic party should stop this, to look at a candidate qualification, should review that person's history, background, the experience, as a human, they need nine months to proceed then to grow up, nothing can jump up without taken this step, if not, it must fail, it is fairy tale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly, Kansas City, MO</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544823</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly, Kansas City, MO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 03:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544823</guid>
		<description>Oh boy!  Clinton wins!  (Finally...)

Their counting took so long that it almost seems irrelevant now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh boy!  Clinton wins!  (Finally...)</p>
<p>Their counting took so long that it almost seems irrelevant now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544820</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 03:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544820</guid>
		<description>New Mexico was a Primary not a caucus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New Mexico was a Primary not a caucus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sparkle, MO</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544815</link>
		<dc:creator>Sparkle, MO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 03:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544815</guid>
		<description>Interesting how many posters would like to vote for Hillary simply because she is a woman. And then there are the fake Democrats who would vote for someone like McCain if HRC is not the nominee. How childish can you get? People with this mentality should have their vote stripped from them, but alas this is the good ole U.S. of A.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting how many posters would like to vote for Hillary simply because she is a woman. And then there are the fake Democrats who would vote for someone like McCain if HRC is not the nominee. How childish can you get? People with this mentality should have their vote stripped from them, but alas this is the good ole U.S. of A.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: juan</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544809</link>
		<dc:creator>juan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 03:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544809</guid>
		<description>Correction sir Electorial Votes not deligates!!!!!!!!! delegates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction sir Electorial Votes not deligates!!!!!!!!! delegates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marie</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544810</link>
		<dc:creator>Marie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 03:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544810</guid>
		<description>To Obama&#039;s supporter.
Whatch out for what you are looking for.  You may just get it.
Hillary is best. She gets my vote. Go Hillary! President 08</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Obama's supporter.<br />
Whatch out for what you are looking for.  You may just get it.<br />
Hillary is best. She gets my vote. Go Hillary! President 08</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544805</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 03:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544805</guid>
		<description>March 4th - Go Hillary

Hillary &#039;08 The real change!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>March 4th &#8211; Go Hillary</p>
<p>Hillary '08 The real change!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wise electorate</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544767</link>
		<dc:creator>Wise electorate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 03:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544767</guid>
		<description>Hilary camp should  reject  the  victory in New Mexico.
WHY?

&quot;Because caucus do not matter. Its is undemocratic as only party activist  participate&quot;

Hahahaha!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hilary camp should  reject  the  victory in New Mexico.<br />
WHY?</p>
<p>"Because caucus do not matter. Its is undemocratic as only party activist  participate"</p>
<p>Hahahaha!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maxine</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544755</link>
		<dc:creator>maxine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544755</guid>
		<description>Hillary people, remember it is a caucus and it doesn&#039;t count or matter, I believe that is what the Clintons have said when Obama won caucuses. Too bad.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary people, remember it is a caucus and it doesn't count or matter, I believe that is what the Clintons have said when Obama won caucuses. Too bad.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Newton, Chicago, IL</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544750</link>
		<dc:creator>Newton, Chicago, IL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544750</guid>
		<description>Hillary wins New Mexico!

...and loses several superdelegates...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary wins New Mexico!</p>
<p>...and loses several superdelegates...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nyron  Cameron</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544732</link>
		<dc:creator>Nyron  Cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544732</guid>
		<description>show some love guys to the 1st lady.... stop hating way to go Hillary..All the people who are talking about Obama win, win, he&#039;s willing the small states.we all know that Algore won more votes than Bush but the deligates was what gave him the presidency so guys don&#039;t watch that.

Hillary has one the major states lets name them...NY, NH, MA,CA , AR,NJ and thats what counts , now she will win TX &amp; PA for sure , however ; she is not stupid she will call Obama to run as VP..If he say no good luck to him.. Both of them are unstoppable.. Unite to win, divided to fall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>show some love guys to the 1st lady.... stop hating way to go Hillary..All the people who are talking about Obama win, win, he's willing the small states.we all know that Algore won more votes than Bush but the deligates was what gave him the presidency so guys don't watch that.</p>
<p>Hillary has one the major states lets name them...NY, NH, MA,CA , AR,NJ and thats what counts , now she will win TX &amp; PA for sure , however ; she is not stupid she will call Obama to run as VP..If he say no good luck to him.. Both of them are unstoppable.. Unite to win, divided to fall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D.</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544712</link>
		<dc:creator>D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544712</guid>
		<description>Texas, Ohio, vote for Hillary Please1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Texas, Ohio, vote for Hillary Please1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544707</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544707</guid>
		<description>Viva Clinton Viva I&#039;m not a obamican I&#039;m a Hillaryite go Woman Go and win the Presidency you will!!!! Viva Viva</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Viva Clinton Viva I'm not a obamican I'm a Hillaryite go Woman Go and win the Presidency you will!!!! Viva Viva</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yolanda alvarez</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544704</link>
		<dc:creator>yolanda alvarez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544704</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t mess with TEXAS........  go Hillary !!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don't mess with TEXAS........  go Hillary !!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LatinoNation</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544615</link>
		<dc:creator>LatinoNation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544615</guid>
		<description>we are Obama  100%,  FOR tHE NEX PRESIDENT OF USA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we are Obama  100%,  FOR tHE NEX PRESIDENT OF USA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apolinar mtnez</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544614</link>
		<dc:creator>apolinar mtnez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544614</guid>
		<description>go hillary 100% obama you going down</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>go hillary 100% obama you going down</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Pittman</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544577</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Pittman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544577</guid>
		<description>Why vote in Nov if I vote is not going to count any how? Because of the super delagets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why vote in Nov if I vote is not going to count any how? Because of the super delagets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jose</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544564</link>
		<dc:creator>jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544564</guid>
		<description>since i used to live in texas , i know a lot of texans that will VOTE FOR HILLARY  THEY ALWAYS VOTE FOR A SMART PERSON AND IN THIS RACE THE SMAT ONE IS HILLARY CLINTON

GO HILLARY  , AND TEXAS BE SMART AND VOTE HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT IN 08</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>since i used to live in texas , i know a lot of texans that will VOTE FOR HILLARY  THEY ALWAYS VOTE FOR A SMART PERSON AND IN THIS RACE THE SMAT ONE IS HILLARY CLINTON</p>
<p>GO HILLARY  , AND TEXAS BE SMART AND VOTE HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT IN 08</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BUKKY</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544562</link>
		<dc:creator>BUKKY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544562</guid>
		<description>Its a caucus... and we all know those activists dont matter... LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its a caucus... and we all know those activists dont matter... LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544508</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544508</guid>
		<description>Does anyone remember when Bill Clinton ran?  He said &quot;CHANGE&quot; he said such some experiences are good and some are bad but you need more than experience you need vision.  WOW! It&#039;s amazing how we are now see Hillary say experience.  LOL!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone remember when Bill Clinton ran?  He said "CHANGE" he said such some experiences are good and some are bad but you need more than experience you need vision.  WOW! It's amazing how we are now see Hillary say experience.  LOL!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 08</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544504</link>
		<dc:creator>08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544504</guid>
		<description>go obama!!! cant believe u came so close in NM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>go obama!!! cant believe u came so close in NM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hunter McCandless</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544503</link>
		<dc:creator>Hunter McCandless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544503</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t wait till March 4th!!  My favorite movie is being released to DVD and Hillary will run out of excuses.  Hil, say hello to Rudy from a former NY&#039;er when you go hang with him to study how bluffing to win one state of 50 doesn&#039;t work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can't wait till March 4th!!  My favorite movie is being released to DVD and Hillary will run out of excuses.  Hil, say hello to Rudy from a former NY'er when you go hang with him to study how bluffing to win one state of 50 doesn't work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YoungVoteForHillary</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544488</link>
		<dc:creator>YoungVoteForHillary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544488</guid>
		<description>No downplaying a victory!  Young voters love Hillary!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No downplaying a victory!  Young voters love Hillary!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charlotte</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544464</link>
		<dc:creator>charlotte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544464</guid>
		<description>49% to 48%.....she really blew him away...   Hillary&#039;s &quot;experience&quot; scares me, talk about caving in to special interests.......it will be more of the same... let&#039;s move on!  Obama&#039;s &quot;lack of experience&quot; means he does not owe as many favors and can make his own decisions.   So far, his own personal life decisions seem pretty solid to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>49% to 48%.....she really blew him away...   Hillary's "experience" scares me, talk about caving in to special interests.......it will be more of the same... let's move on!  Obama's "lack of experience" means he does not owe as many favors and can make his own decisions.   So far, his own personal life decisions seem pretty solid to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Easy</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544463</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Easy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544463</guid>
		<description>You Obama fanatics are deaf dumb and blind.  Your votes are so important for all of us, please read and inform yourselves before you vote for Obama.  Don&#039;t let the media bias against Clinton mislead you.

Hillary will win Texas, Ohio and PA!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You Obama fanatics are deaf dumb and blind.  Your votes are so important for all of us, please read and inform yourselves before you vote for Obama.  Don't let the media bias against Clinton mislead you.</p>
<p>Hillary will win Texas, Ohio and PA!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 31 yr Old Voter</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544429</link>
		<dc:creator>31 yr Old Voter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544429</guid>
		<description>They said the delegates were already awarded. HA geez looks like the HRC campaigners are pretending to be like OBAMAMANICS!!!!

GUESS THEY CANT THINK OF THEIR OWN SLOGANS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They said the delegates were already awarded. HA geez looks like the HRC campaigners are pretending to be like OBAMAMANICS!!!!</p>
<p>GUESS THEY CANT THINK OF THEIR OWN SLOGANS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deann</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544428</link>
		<dc:creator>Deann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544428</guid>
		<description>In New Mexico if a winner is Obama, Not Clinton, the media will be in favor and report THEIR NEWS totally different, They MUST CLAIM and Making BIG TALK by saying that: Obama is another VICTORY AGAIN, but look at today&#039;s news, the media has not mention too much, their interest is clear, because they try to avoid that news for Hillary will deliver to the public.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In New Mexico if a winner is Obama, Not Clinton, the media will be in favor and report THEIR NEWS totally different, They MUST CLAIM and Making BIG TALK by saying that: Obama is another VICTORY AGAIN, but look at today's news, the media has not mention too much, their interest is clear, because they try to avoid that news for Hillary will deliver to the public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rosemarie</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544427</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosemarie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544427</guid>
		<description>Why do people HATE (that is a very strong word and what has she done to these haters)

She is a brilliant woman, to still be standing after the Garbage CNN and everyone has thrown at her is quite remarkable.   At least she tells us what she is going to do, not like Sen.Obama, yes we can!
Yes WE and I emphasise it again WE, meaning you and I, not him and the government.

Try giving the lady and chance and make it a fair fight.    By the way, what is Sen.Kerry doing endorsing Sen.Obama, oh wait now, didn&#039;t he also vote for the #114 Joint Resolution on Iraq!!!

How pure are you now Mr. Obama, being endorsed by a man who voted for the same resolution that Hillary did.......someone needs to bring this up on National Television, then ask Sen.Obama the same question, come on Hillary supporters, lets get something going!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do people HATE (that is a very strong word and what has she done to these haters)</p>
<p>She is a brilliant woman, to still be standing after the Garbage CNN and everyone has thrown at her is quite remarkable.   At least she tells us what she is going to do, not like Sen.Obama, yes we can!<br />
Yes WE and I emphasise it again WE, meaning you and I, not him and the government.</p>
<p>Try giving the lady and chance and make it a fair fight.    By the way, what is Sen.Kerry doing endorsing Sen.Obama, oh wait now, didn't he also vote for the #114 Joint Resolution on Iraq!!!</p>
<p>How pure are you now Mr. Obama, being endorsed by a man who voted for the same resolution that Hillary did.......someone needs to bring this up on National Television, then ask Sen.Obama the same question, come on Hillary supporters, lets get something going!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane C. Bonacci</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544409</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane C. Bonacci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544409</guid>
		<description>Hang in there, Hillary.  I know you will win!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hang in there, Hillary.  I know you will win!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcia Seattle WA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544404</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcia Seattle WA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544404</guid>
		<description>Go Hillary!!!!!!! Eat that Obama.......The man of all talk, but can he walk the talk........He sure can make speeches but no real facts to back the words.....remember words are free.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go Hillary!!!!!!! Eat that Obama.......The man of all talk, but can he walk the talk........He sure can make speeches but no real facts to back the words.....remember words are free.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dorian</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544397</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544397</guid>
		<description>Boy, right now you Obama supporters are sure living in a fool&#039;s paradise.  Hillary never said  caucuses don&#039;t count, never!  She said she hadn&#039;t expected to win in most caucus states because caucuses are dominated by activists, which her supporters are not.  Also, while you are all minimizing her win in New Mexico because it was by a slim margin, don&#039;t forget how Obama &quot;cleaned up&quot; by getting the majority of the 500 or so votes cast in Alaska, and in the much bigger state of Missouri, he squeaked out a won by only 5000 votes ( a mere drop in the bucket compared to the overall number of votes cast in the state).  And, while you are high-fiving each other about how many more states your boy has won, don&#039;t forget that Hillary won Florida by a huge margin and Michigan by a substantial percentage.  All you star-stricken Obama-ites just might be celebrating too soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boy, right now you Obama supporters are sure living in a fool's paradise.  Hillary never said  caucuses don't count, never!  She said she hadn't expected to win in most caucus states because caucuses are dominated by activists, which her supporters are not.  Also, while you are all minimizing her win in New Mexico because it was by a slim margin, don't forget how Obama "cleaned up" by getting the majority of the 500 or so votes cast in Alaska, and in the much bigger state of Missouri, he squeaked out a won by only 5000 votes ( a mere drop in the bucket compared to the overall number of votes cast in the state).  And, while you are high-fiving each other about how many more states your boy has won, don't forget that Hillary won Florida by a huge margin and Michigan by a substantial percentage.  All you star-stricken Obama-ites just might be celebrating too soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NM Transplant</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544383</link>
		<dc:creator>NM Transplant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544383</guid>
		<description>New Mexico&#039;s democratic primary is called a caucus but is not handled like a caucus.  People check ballot boxes, just like a regular election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New Mexico's democratic primary is called a caucus but is not handled like a caucus.  People check ballot boxes, just like a regular election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimdon</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544369</link>
		<dc:creator>jimdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544369</guid>
		<description>some how i feel as if someone is looking over my shoulder and when i make a comment someone doe&#039;snt care for i get censured,,,or im always being moderated and can never find my post&#039;s,,,,i have made dozen&#039;s of post&#039;s in these blogs but never seem to get posted,hhmmm
i&#039;ll see what happens with this one,and if i feel censured,there will be no more post&#039;s from me,,we will see.......jimdon,,st, petersburg,,florida</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>some how i feel as if someone is looking over my shoulder and when i make a comment someone doe'snt care for i get censured,,,or im always being moderated and can never find my post's,,,,i have made dozen's of post's in these blogs but never seem to get posted,hhmmm<br />
i'll see what happens with this one,and if i feel censured,there will be no more post's from me,,we will see.......jimdon,,st, petersburg,,florida</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544361</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544361</guid>
		<description>C wrote:

&quot; Please try harder to offer objective reporting! &quot;

I cannot agree more. CNN was so busy bashing Hillary that they and other central media did not even explain the reason behind moving Fla primary. Dems. of other states have no clue. Here it is:

The DNC rule &quot;not to schedule a primary before February 5″ was not violated because of Florida democrats but rather, because the REPUBLICAN legislature tacked the earlier primary date on a bill that provided for paper ballots in Florida that had to be supported by democrats (a previous experience proved the need of a paper trail). So the democrats were unable to stop the movement of the primary to an earlier date. To now punish the democrats by not counting their delegates is an outrage! Obama ran lots of cable TV ads in Florida. If anything, that should be a reason to count the primary votes! Florida democrats feel disenfranchised and insulted by the DNC. They worked hard for this election and the democrats had a record turnout. The individual voters should not be punished for the State&#039;s decision. No caucus, no splitting even, no re-voting! Count the voice of Florida democrats!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C wrote:</p>
<p>" Please try harder to offer objective reporting! "</p>
<p>I cannot agree more. CNN was so busy bashing Hillary that they and other central media did not even explain the reason behind moving Fla primary. Dems. of other states have no clue. Here it is:</p>
<p>The DNC rule "not to schedule a primary before February 5″ was not violated because of Florida democrats but rather, because the REPUBLICAN legislature tacked the earlier primary date on a bill that provided for paper ballots in Florida that had to be supported by democrats (a previous experience proved the need of a paper trail). So the democrats were unable to stop the movement of the primary to an earlier date. To now punish the democrats by not counting their delegates is an outrage! Obama ran lots of cable TV ads in Florida. If anything, that should be a reason to count the primary votes! Florida democrats feel disenfranchised and insulted by the DNC. They worked hard for this election and the democrats had a record turnout. The individual voters should not be punished for the State's decision. No caucus, no splitting even, no re-voting! Count the voice of Florida democrats!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sparkle, MO</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544357</link>
		<dc:creator>Sparkle, MO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544357</guid>
		<description>Smells fishy, but congrats to HRC (she needed it)

OBAMA 2008!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smells fishy, but congrats to HRC (she needed it)</p>
<p>OBAMA 2008!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ROCCO</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544350</link>
		<dc:creator>ROCCO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544350</guid>
		<description>SHE&#039;S GOING TO WIN.. HAHA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SHE'S GOING TO WIN.. HAHA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KMAN</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544333</link>
		<dc:creator>KMAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544333</guid>
		<description>Something you Hillary supporters should consider ... she will never carry Independents and has no chance of drawing over a significant number of Republicans in a general election.  You seem to forget that Rebublicans by and large hate her and Bill ... and far too many loyal Democrats are simply sick and tired of the Clintons.  NY State you keep her along with her earmarks totaling over a 1/4 billion dollars!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something you Hillary supporters should consider ... she will never carry Independents and has no chance of drawing over a significant number of Republicans in a general election.  You seem to forget that Rebublicans by and large hate her and Bill ... and far too many loyal Democrats are simply sick and tired of the Clintons.  NY State you keep her along with her earmarks totaling over a 1/4 billion dollars!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chemoztlan</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544309</link>
		<dc:creator>chemoztlan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 01:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544309</guid>
		<description>Hillary all the way!
I think it&#039;s time Barack went into specifics so people really knew what he really inspires in people....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary all the way!<br />
I think it's time Barack went into specifics so people really knew what he really inspires in people....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WAKE UP AMERICA!!!</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544308</link>
		<dc:creator>WAKE UP AMERICA!!!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 01:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544308</guid>
		<description>Just as I predicted days ago on this very same site.  

Why else would slimy Bill Clinton all of a sudden feel so compelled to go watch the SuperBowl with Richardson?

Does Florida 2000 come to mind anyone?

ONLY THIS TIME, THE GOVERNOR ISN&#039;T RELATED TO THE WINNING CANDIDATE OF HIS STATE.

America has turned into one of those countries we have always scolded for holding unfair elections that cheat the people out of their votes.

SHAME, SHAME, SHAME ON AMERICA!

And, shame on CNN  for holding my comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just as I predicted days ago on this very same site.  </p>
<p>Why else would slimy Bill Clinton all of a sudden feel so compelled to go watch the SuperBowl with Richardson?</p>
<p>Does Florida 2000 come to mind anyone?</p>
<p>ONLY THIS TIME, THE GOVERNOR ISN'T RELATED TO THE WINNING CANDIDATE OF HIS STATE.</p>
<p>America has turned into one of those countries we have always scolded for holding unfair elections that cheat the people out of their votes.</p>
<p>SHAME, SHAME, SHAME ON AMERICA!</p>
<p>And, shame on CNN  for holding my comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy DeWitt</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544306</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy DeWitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 01:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544306</guid>
		<description>Why does the media hate Hillary Clinton?  Obama steals her ideas for the economy, etc., alters them slightly, and claims they are his.  Does the media ever call him on this?  No!  Obama owes most of his wins to independent voters, not democrats.  Does the media examine this and offer that many of those independents lean republican and only voted against Hillary, not for Obama.  No!   They have spent more than one year attacking Mrs. Clinton.  In spite of the FACT that she alone creates plans to save the economy, health care, medicare, foreign policy, the media ignores this talent.  Even when her ideas are obviously stolen by Obama, the media reports that the two candidates have similar plans.  When did the press become as corrupt as our government?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does the media hate Hillary Clinton?  Obama steals her ideas for the economy, etc., alters them slightly, and claims they are his.  Does the media ever call him on this?  No!  Obama owes most of his wins to independent voters, not democrats.  Does the media examine this and offer that many of those independents lean republican and only voted against Hillary, not for Obama.  No!   They have spent more than one year attacking Mrs. Clinton.  In spite of the FACT that she alone creates plans to save the economy, health care, medicare, foreign policy, the media ignores this talent.  Even when her ideas are obviously stolen by Obama, the media reports that the two candidates have similar plans.  When did the press become as corrupt as our government?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: juan</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544281</link>
		<dc:creator>juan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 01:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544281</guid>
		<description>Go Obama you got my vote!!!! I&#039;m on the ground in Texas now tell my people about you!!! See you in Texas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go Obama you got my vote!!!! I'm on the ground in Texas now tell my people about you!!! See you in Texas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544248</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 01:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544248</guid>
		<description>&quot;And the funny thing is that all these so-called commentators have their degrees in journalism, not government, political science, or history. What the heck do they know? They had probably never even heard of Barack Obama 4 months ago.&quot;

Huh?  I spent nearly 40 years in radio and television news and can tell you that most &quot;commentators&quot; do NOT have degrees in journalism...where did you get that idea?   News people have all sorts of degrees and some (like Peter Jennings) never went to college. 

And almost everybody in the news business remembers Barack Obama&#039;s spellbinding speech at the 2004 Democratic convention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"And the funny thing is that all these so-called commentators have their degrees in journalism, not government, political science, or history. What the heck do they know? They had probably never even heard of Barack Obama 4 months ago."</p>
<p>Huh?  I spent nearly 40 years in radio and television news and can tell you that most "commentators" do NOT have degrees in journalism...where did you get that idea?   News people have all sorts of degrees and some (like Peter Jennings) never went to college. </p>
<p>And almost everybody in the news business remembers Barack Obama's spellbinding speech at the 2004 Democratic convention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bernie</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544208</link>
		<dc:creator>bernie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 01:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544208</guid>
		<description>how many large states has obama won ?he won all the states that will be won by republicans in the the fall.he has had a free ride but i think he will have to explain his record instead of just preaching.just remember the ninty&#039;s when we had a safe and prosperous county.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how many large states has obama won ?he won all the states that will be won by republicans in the the fall.he has had a free ride but i think he will have to explain his record instead of just preaching.just remember the ninty's when we had a safe and prosperous county.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geri</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544206</link>
		<dc:creator>Geri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 01:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544206</guid>
		<description>I live in a caucus state &amp; I certainly wish they&#039;d go for a primary.  Iowa will never do that because it has to be 1st in the nation.  This last one was a joke.  Bitter cold night, held at 6:30 and confusion galore. The people who work 2nd shift couldn&#039;t partake.  As for you Obama supporters ...you know where you can go.  You are such nasty people and your &quot;leader&quot; is such a good Gof fearing person and a presacher on the campaign trail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live in a caucus state &amp; I certainly wish they'd go for a primary.  Iowa will never do that because it has to be 1st in the nation.  This last one was a joke.  Bitter cold night, held at 6:30 and confusion galore. The people who work 2nd shift couldn't partake.  As for you Obama supporters ...you know where you can go.  You are such nasty people and your "leader" is such a good Gof fearing person and a presacher on the campaign trail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gerry</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544117</link>
		<dc:creator>gerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 01:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/14/clinton-wins-new-mexico-caucuses/#comment-544117</guid>
		<description>to all you obama lovers media included are you trying to show your ignorance ever time you nblog or are ye really ignorant cant ye mindless fools see that he is just a preecher that the repulican party want to go against because he has no substance.get  a life he is no saviour how sade is your life no one is going to make your life better but yourself.  the clintons are respected by the rest of the world and at the moment usa is a laughing stock. wasters vote for obama because their easly led</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to all you obama lovers media included are you trying to show your ignorance ever time you nblog or are ye really ignorant cant ye mindless fools see that he is just a preecher that the repulican party want to go against because he has no substance.get  a life he is no saviour how sade is your life no one is going to make your life better but yourself.  the clintons are respected by the rest of the world and at the moment usa is a laughing stock. wasters vote for obama because their easly led</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
