Wait, so Hillary Clinton gets credit for Bill's coming back in 1992 and 1996? My wife graduated from an Ivy league college, can I put that on my resume?

Wolf has been adamantly supporting Clinton all year…

With all respect, I believe CNN needs to make a prominent, visible apology for Sen. Clinton and her team for the treatment shown by cutting out in the middle of her speech to present Sen. Obama's lenghty, not new speech. Combine that with language used by many CNN commentators and it forms a pattern.

I agree, I think Obama is being a little pompous. He may very well win the nomination, I do not believe he will win in November. I want a person of substance, not pretty speeches. I am a Reagan democrat who will vote for McCain if Obama is the democrats nominee. I'm not fooled by a cheer leader, we just had one of those for 8 years.

Yes, count Hillary out. She and the other half of the "Dynamic Rollover Duo," Rep. Pelosi, can _both_ be counted out. It is insulting for Clinton to call herself the candidate for change when she has had plenty of opportunities to vote for change, but has instead rolled over like a little doggie every time Bush and the repukeblicans give the slightest pushback. Good bye, Hillary. The dust from Obama's campaign is now obscuring the view. I think I'll look to the future.

Most of this history is about Bill Clinton, not Hillary Clinton. Notwithstanding the carpet-bagging allegation, Hillary Clinton has never faced serious opposition for any elected position.

Not a bad piece at all Wolf. There is much more fairness and balance in this article that I have seen in virtually any CNN election article. I'm loving you again. Obama may be flexing his muscles and smiling broadly for the camera, but at the end of the day the Clintons are loved by many. People haven't forgotten her contributions, particularly on child heathcare and even immigration. Many also recognize her as an authority in foreign relations. It is an uphill battle for her, but hardly over at this point.

The only way she can get out of trouble is to continue to hurl dirty tricks at Senator Obama. She is trying to win this race by any means necessary and she is willing to tear her opponent down in the process. I dont want her to "bounce back" she has shown her true colors. She is an evil woman and she is only interested in the position of US PRESIDENT for the fame and not the responsibilities that comes with it. Obama is for the people and I hate to see her try to rip him apart. It makes her look bad. I hope Obama asks about her not releasing her taxes at the debate tomorrow. Im sure her campaign staf has her prepped to side step it somehow.

Dear Wolf:
I don't think your argument to "not count Clinton out" holds any water. To say Hillary's campaign is not out simply because her HUSBAND's political career was full of comebacks makes no real sense. In fact, it is likely to backfire against her — people want change, not another another Clinton merely for Clinton's sake.
Aris

Thank you Wolf Blitzer. I agree with you 100% and hope Hillary does make it. We need the change of a woman in the White House and she is it.

THANKS WOLF: February's primaries are gone. March is HILLARY's month!!!! She is the most qualified candidate for president and people will make a mistake if she will not be given a chance to prove that. Obama can inspire but he cannot lead!!!! He needs more experience to solve the problems that we have right now.

I have never doubted HILLARY's persistence to win this race! She has the tested brand name and that is her advantage. If course, she can fight with her experience and expertise. She has put alot of energy & commitment to this campaign that is very admirable!!!!! The Texans & Ohians including voters from RI & VT will see this & support her!

the only reason she is still alive is b/c of bill clinton and his political machine. if obama had lost in 10 straight contests by double-digit margins, the clintons and the media would be clamoring for him to step down and concede.

the double standard is ridiculous.

Wolf, for someone who comes across as a pretty intelligent guy, I'm surprised by your suggestion this isn't really over. The comeback's you speak of are irrelevant. First, Bill Clinton's NH comeback was early in the game. We've already have had more than half the country speak now, and the majority are saying no to another Clinton candidacy. Second, your other bounce backs for Clinton are meaningless, because they are in fact coming back to haunt her. The fact she didn't get rid of Bill long ago is diminishing her campaign.

Wolf,

This is not New Hampshire in 1992 — a race Bill actually lost, you will recall — nor is it New Hampshire in 2008 — a race Hillary won by a very narrow margin in terms of both the raw vote and in pleged delegates. Narrow victories (much less losses that are "moral victories") don't help Hillary Clinton now. She needs blowout victories to merely just pull even with Barack Obama. The unavoidable reality here is that Obama is going to be the democratic nominee, barring a remarkable game-changing development (or a very unlikely hijacking of the process by the superdelegates — a turn of events that appears very unlikely now).

To use a football analogy, Senator Clinton is down by two touchdowns and there are less that two minutes on the clock. She needs (1) a length of the field TD drive, (2) a successful onsides kick, and (3) a second TD drive, all against a defense against which points have been hard for her to put on the board throughout the entire game. It may be possible, but at this point Don Meredith would probably be singing "Turn out the lights, the party's over . . ."

Wolf, thank you so much from the bottom of my heart for not trashing the Clintons like all the rest of the media. It's very disheartening and sad watching all the media so biased against the Cllintons. You have given me "HOPE" knowing that there are still some fair and balanced reporters in our country. You have my greatest respect!!! I am sure half of the voters in this democratic elections who voted for Hillary feel the same way. THANK YOU!!!

Wolf…this is EXACTLY why I will not support Hillary Clinton…we do NOT need this again for the next 8 years! Enough is enough.

The one contributing factor to all of Bill Clinton's "combacks" was this - HE HAD THE SUPPORT OF THE PEOPLE! It is becoming increasingly obvious that Barack Obama has the support of the people as well. The people like Bill Clinton, Hillary, not so much. Of all the scandals Bill went through, all of them were, for a lack of a better term, extacurricular activities. None of them were because of his job performance. Hillary is losing her grip on the demographic that could her the most and her grip on the reality that she is going to lose this nomination. Obama in 08!!!!!

Does Mr. Blitzer work for CNN or the Clinton campaign ?

Is Wolf moderating tomorrow's debate? Based on what I just read, I foresee some more softballs lobbed to Senator Clinton. Nice job, Wolf, aiding and abetting the Clintonian ripping apart of the Democratic party with your unrealistic drivel. Hillary has to take somewhere around 58% of the remaining pledged delegates to draw even. For once the Clintons should consider somebody other than themselves. She wants to give America a voice yet would drown out the wishes of voters by stealing the election via poaching pledged delegates and strong-arming superdelegates??? Cut me a break ~ this is the biggest fairytale I've ever seen.

Thank you Wolf for at least mentioning the scandals of those days….support for any candidate aside someone really needs to remind people why they should vote for anyone but her…..The Clinton scandals list is long very very long……………

Wolf after openly biased against Hillary, now trying to keep the ball rolling! Why? The media needs the hype of the race otherwise their viewership tails off. Obama / McCain with 9 months to go is just not as compelling as Obama / Hillary. The Media Elite is here at work again. They crowned their man OBAMA a bit too soon apparently.
IKE cautioned that the military indusrial complex was in danger of taking over our democracy - now its the media.

Waht does Bill Clinton's political career have to do with Hillary Clinton's political career? Come on!!!!! Who is running for President… Bill or Hillary? Let's focus on whether Hillary can make a come back on her own now, not based on Bill's past performance.

Wolf, you're right, but she needs to win BIG in Texas and Ohio - like 60-40 and I don't think that's gonna happen.

We in Israel had a lady Prime Minister who ran this nation during very difficult times including a war. If anyone thinks a woman leader cannot be tough, think of Golda. If Hillary is anything like Golda, the U.S. will have a great President. So far all of Obama's rhetoric has been words, words, words. He calls for change but I'd like to hear him say specifically change to what!! And what is he going to change? The constitution?

Thanks for reminding me how horrible the Clintons really are.

Hillary needs to stop her negative campagin against Obama who will be the democratic nominee and bow out gracefully to save her legacy.

So what you're saying, Wolf, is that you want us to believe she still has a chance so we'll watch CNN's debate tomorrow night…

Come on, Bill Clinton coming back in NH is a lot different than the current situation. It is February 20, and she's trying to stage an epic comeback in TX and OH. The margins she needs are pretty much unattainable.

We know the media wants to keep the battle alive to keep ratings up, but let's be realistic (as Hillary likes to say).

I am a Barak supporter, but this is the most negative "positive" piece on Hillary I have ever seen.

but hillary is not bill and it is not the 90's. time for a CHANGE!

I would say wait and see what she does in Ohio before I count her out and Penn. as well.
But I'm for Obama but voted for Hillary.
Obama '08

Wolf , she is out already. She has no new plans and everyone is obviously tired of her negative attacks. Her attack makes it worst for her to come back in the race.!!!

Wolf,

When you talk about the comeback kid you need to remember that was Bill not Hillary. Hillary had her chance to comeback last night but she couldn't pull it off.

at what point in this campaign are you going to stop slanting all your coverage to obama. do you not feel ashamed of yourself for always finding ways to trash the clintons. will you ever ask obama the hard questions or dig into his life. will you ever question his accomplishments oh wait he does not have any . and what about his drug use? his voting present rather then taking astand his support of the chaney energy bill?
oh that right you only trash the clintons. so does that make you a talk show host rather then a real reporter?

THANK YOU Wolf for an honest piece. No one should be counting Hillary out just yet. Yes, Obama is doing very well and is ahead - but not by all that much. To say Hillary should give up when the race is relatively close, and with many states to go, is not only premature - but just plain stupid.

Great analysis Wolf, as you say, Hillary is a fighter and will come back.

Thank you, Wolf Blitzer, for remaining neutral and not joining the bandwagon of Obama supporters. I am a Veteran of OIF III and I will support Hillary first, McCain second. There is no way that I could vote a junior senator who does not have that much experience to the most powerful position in the country. Many people are voting for him so that they can say that during their lifetime, a black man was voted into the white house. He is an ICON to many Americans and that is blinding their judgment. Many people actually look past his iconic figure and realize that America is in trouble and that we need a president who has a plan to fix America. Obama does not have that plan right now, but his supporters seem to not care. Many of his supporters just brag about how they voted for a black man. That is nothing to brag about. Don’t vote for us because you feel like you owe us something, vote for us because you feel like we deserve it. Obama is a political rock star and 80% of the black population feels like he should be president, while approximately 20% feels like he doesn't deserve that kind of position because he hasn't earned it. Are we sell outs? No we are not. We just feel like he would not represent our race well at this time because he lacks the experience that the other two candidates possess.

Hillary would distroy this country!

I was a big supporter of President Clinton and I had a great deal of respect for Hillary and her civil and community service. However, I have great concerns that the Clinton's are too politically savvy. Hillary has seemed to learn the Washington trick of aspirations, taking positions and votes with an eye to their future goals.

I was very disappointed at the NAFTA treaty, welfare reform, and Marriage Act that President Clinton supported and Hilary said that she would have supported (DOMA).

Perhaps Sen. Obama has not been in DC long enough to have learned those games, but that is exactly what is so refreshing about him. He seems to be real. For God's sakes he even admits that he smokes.

I think President Clinton has hurt his reputation in his being an attack dog for his wife's campaign. Hilary is seeming desperate with all of this plagiarism nonsense, and attack on his campaign of hope.

After 8 years of President Bush, this country needs hope, a real inspirational president who admits his flaws and admits he needs us all to work together to solve the problems of our country. Bill Clinton may have admired JFK, but Obama seems to have learned more from him and embodies his spirit better.

Bush, Clinton, Bush…Clinton? A string of family presidents is not what the founding fathers had in mind.

Senator Obama, keep offering us hope, keep challenging us to be better. We need a real leader of our country, a real person, a figure of inspiration. We need a fresh wind to blow through DC and the White House.

Wolf, if Clinton wins every single contest through the end of the primary season by 10%, she'll still be behind in pledged delegates by about 60. How can you say she's not done, with that said?

I am a former republican, now and independent, and a Hillary supporter. I too will be voting for McCain if Obama wins the nomination. However, I do not believe that will be the case. My feeling is that she will prevail in Texas, Ohio and RI, and that will carry her to a big victory in PA.

Ditto, Ditto, Ditto

Thank you, Wolf. It's nice to read an article that's just looking at the race and doesn't seem like the author is absolutely salivating for the Clinton downfall. Even my mother, who is a rabid Republican with no love for the Clintons, said about the media, "Why are they treating her like that?".

Hillary Clinton's time is over. She had her moment. She had 8 years in the White House. It's time to turn the page with a man who will honor & elevate the Presidency. Barack Obama will make us proud, each & every one of us. It's time for Hillary Clinton to step aside. Yes we can Hillary. Yes. We. Can. You need to step aside.

Most of these are examples of Bill Clinton bouncing back. She is not Bill Clinton. She has proven that throughout this campaign.

Exuse me, but when did this campaign become Obama vs. Hillary & Bill? Last I checked, Hillary's name was the one on the ballot. Half the commentary in this article is about Bill, who isn't even a candidate this time around. And besides, didn't we see in SC what happens when Bill steps into the process?

If you want to argue that Hillary shouldn't be counted out yet, then fine…but do it on her merits alone, not those of her husband's.

i agree with you Wolf, you cannt count out the clintons. but with Obama leading by more than 150 delegates, i think the contest is for him to loose. lets face it Mrs Clinton may win Ohio and Texas but not with a big margin, and with delegates divided proportionally it will be very difficult to catch up!

I agree with you, however, what is being missed by most pundits is the degree of change that Americans want. Sen. Obama gives the appearance of being capable to take the country in a totally different direction, he offers the hope of that. It seems to be the best "giving the people what they want" candidate offer to date.

"I'm not fooled by a cheer leader, we just had one of those for 8 years." Please Elaborate. In what ways can GW Bush can be compared to Barack Obama?

-Wolf, why do you equate Bill with Hillary? That 's unfair to her.

-I am not counting her out either but I don't know she wins without blowing the party up.

Obama '08

Stop relying on her husband, stop relying on attacking Obama, stop relying on tactics and go on sincere merit. Then step aside and let Obama take the podium for the democratic party.

Where's the beef, Wolf. Show us some mathematics that says Hillary still has a chance. You're keeping a race going that's over, sir. She has lost. She has no mathematical chance.

I agree!

Hillary is in this to win it.

I can't believe that so many of Mrs. Clintons supporters have abandoned her for what they believe to be "the next best thing."

What happened to supporting your candidate, this race is far from over, we have two more debates yet, PLUS Hillary will win in both Texas and Ohio.

It is experience that we need to run this country, and Hillary has the experience and the stamina to do it!

It's time to move Hillary back into the White House and let her do what she does best.

I can't wait to see Mrs. Clinton give her first interview as Commander In Chief.

Hillary has worked for this, she has earned this, she deserves this!

I believe that Hillary can do in Ohio and Texas what she did in Florida … and that was a clear win.
Obama keeps talking … but saying nothing.

Hillary '08

I personally believe that if Hillary does decide to stay in, she needs to change away from negative campaiging. I know this is unlikely, but I wish that she would remember that in the end, she and Obama are on the same team. The real battle is for the White House in November.

I was a Hillary supporter, but she lost me. I'm deeply disappointed in how she's run her campaign. I know that I am not alone. And it will damage the Democratic Party if she does get the nomination via some type of backroom politicking. She is pushing for the Michigan and Florida votes to count in her favor, even though Obama was not even on the ballot in Michigan; this does not say much about her character as a potential world leader, that she would change teh rules after everyone has agreed to them simply to win.

Hillary needs to consider how she will fare after this race if she doesn't get the nomination. By attacking Obama (and really, the people who voted for him in the process), she may seriously damage her images long term.

I also think it's worth noting that I was a big Bill Clinton supporter, and I have been turned off by his behavior while campaigning for his wife.

JimF,

You have to understand "news." Clinton was giving a speech as the results came in so as she was losing, she would be on television in Ohio, distracting people from her devastating loss. For CNN to play her speech for any longer would be falling directly into the trap she laid out for them.

The most timely news last night was the winning of the Wisconsin primaries by Obama and McCain. Clinton's speech was not "new" or even relevant to the events that took place last night. Her primary goal was to DISTRACT voters from the events that took place.

CNN was covering the most prominent, timely and relevant news at that moment. End of story.

Sad day for America
So many Zombies are following Obama and have not idea what hell is headed our way
please see Obama for the very dangerous, self centered man that is feeding you a "good speech"…all empty words
you know he is the devil in a good suit
open your eyes before it is too late

Thanks for reminding us about all the horrible things that went along with his presidency.

Also, get over the speech thing. Yes, they cut over to his speech because he was the WINNER that night and it was his VICTORY speech. Had Clinton won, I can absolutely guarantee you hers would have been put first over his.

AND PLEASE STOP SAYING ALL HE CAN DO IS GIVE SPEECHES! Speak for yourself instead of reciting the same tired rhetoric the Clinton campaign has. For someone who claims all Obama does is offer words, Hillary (and her supporters) keep restating the same words over and over and over again. Find a new argument, because that one obviously isn't working.

I am a stauch democrat and a business owner. If the choice becomes Obama and Mccain in November, I would seriously consider voting for McCain. At the end of the day, experience MUST be a key deciding factor. It's the primary criteria I'd hire someone to work for me. Why would anyone do less for our country. Obama is an intelligent and articulate man. Now he needs to get the experience needed to become a world leader, and when he does, I will be the first to campaign and vote for him.

I also will vote for McCain if BO is the nomine and your right he is pompous.
BTW how did the likes of Jack Cafferty snake his way onto the political panels on the Sit Rm.
he is just full of venom and bitterness toward HRC.
Reb

Wolf why don't you call Senator Obama on his lie about the Michigan primary: it was his choice to take his name off the ballot so now that he lost there he wants to remove the delegate votes Senator Clinton won removed. Who said we lived in a democratic country. Its time you so called journalists got real and checked your facts.

If you believe Obama has no substance, please go to his website and study his accomplishments and policies. He has much sustance. Also, would someone please tell me what Clintons 35 years of experience is. She has yet to describe it. Fighting the Republicans is not experience its stupidity.

I agree with you Wolf. Never underestimate the Clintons. They will use every tactic they can to win. Remember Hillary is the "say-anything and do-anything to win" candidate. I believe the Obama camp learned there lesson after New Hampshire, 'TAKE NOTHING FOR GRANTED'! The ten straight consecutive wins of Obama post-Super Tuesday just reinforces the Obama campaign to work harder. I know I am. I will donate more and call more to help the Obama campaign achieve its primary goal.

Just to think, I have never been involved in political campaigning in my life.

Obama in '08!

It is amazing how the political spin machine works

US media is a joke

Mr. Blitzer, you are a journalist not a cheerleader!

If Hilary was ahead in delegates and won 10 in a row, you guys would be singing good bye Obama. Instead all the headlines say how Hilary needs to turn around!!!!

Shame on you CNN You have no integrity

What can I say? It's not over till it's over…it's not over till the fat lady sings? Like a basketball game…you feel good when your team makes a basket, when the other team makes a basket you get anxious…save your energy till the final minutes of the game…thanx for being so candid with your privileged insight…

Yippee! Yippee! Yippee!
It's Obammy for me!!
All the jelly beans I want,
and even the Ice Cream is free!

But now it's time to pay the tab,
where is that Obama cad?
Oh it looks like I have to pay
I get to pay the bill today,
and all my ice cream's melted away!

I watched obama's speech last night when he was asking voters to please vote early and not wait to March 4. I had to wonder if this is because of the up coming debates. For all his denials I do believe he is afraid to debate Hillary because he has such little substance and taking the front runner position his flaws are starting to show. Watching his debates are like watching a pep rally at a High SCHOOL FOOTBALL GAME.

CNN makes more money if they can make it a close race by bolstering the underdog, closer race makes more coverage and more trumped up excitement, which leads to the intended result of higher ratings and advertising dollars. CNN went to garbage in the course of this primary season.

I'm not counting her out, but… I was a Hillary supporter, and I would vote for her now if she is honestly and farely nominated. However, I voted for Obama (in California) and I will be supporting him all the way through November. The issue is and was CHANGE, ever since the last elections. Change everything and everyone. Throw out the bath water, the baby, the tub, and everyone involved in the nonsence of the last 7 years. We need REAL change, of everything, and everyone.

I only hope that you are correct that the democrats will wake up and get beyond the pretty boy image and vote for substance. I have to say that you Wolf are the only news person on CNN who actually covers the news, with comment,,not the other way around as most of your fellow workers do. Obama has gained all this attention mainly because of the type of comment coverage he has received at CNN. The selection of who gets to voice their opinions is interesting too.
Please try to encourage your producers to promote more straight news covereage, and less direction of how people should think. Keep up the good work Wolf, you are in a sea of egomaniacs.

Wow! All I can say is WOW!!!!!

Wolf, you just came across as a hypocrite. Are you running for office?

You and the rest of the media SMEAR her for weeks on end and can't stop panting over Obama and then have the nerve to say 'don't count her out?' Is it green or red kool-aid in your cup?

You even have a ticker that encourages white men not to vote for a woman and then say 'don't count her out.'

Wow!

I'm tired of hearing Obama saying the same thing over and over and over. His words are tied to nothing — bubbles floating in the air.

McCain will take him down and the country will be no better off than it is now.

Where is CNN's coverage of the 80 different districts in Clinton's home state that failed to report any votes for Obama even in Harlem?

I totally agree that CNN needs to make an apology to Sen. Clinton and her team. I was watching her speech and couldn't believe they cut out in the middle to present Sen Obama's lengthy boring speech that went on forever. I was very upset.

THere definitely is a pattern among the CNN commentators, they have annointed OBAMA…..and everything, and I mean everything, is blamed on the Clintons. It would be nice if just one time they would have something good to say about Pres Clinton and Hillary and Chelsea. Obama's wife doesn't get any flak for her comment about "her being very proud of her country for the first time"…..it's just very unfair. Fair and Balanced CNN is not.

Hilliary is washed and so his her husband. Sure Bill did some good things while he was in office but so did Bush and where did that leave us? All the attacts need to just go. It's stupid and childish, why cant they just run respectfully? I am for Obama simply because he represents true change neither McCaine or Clinton can say that. They sit and run a decent campaign until they start loosing or in MCaine case being fearfull of not being able to withstand the financial backing Obama has, the only way I would even consider voting and that is if Obama wins. Should it be Hilliary vs Mc Caine I will not vote in November!!

CNN make an apology? Never. At least not with all the Anti Hillary and Pro Obama discussions/footage running wild on CNN. Last night was the last time I will ever watch CNN. Not that it matters of course but the level of bias reporting taking place made me sick to my stomach.

No Sound person would count Hillary out just yet and the next 2 weeks will be very telling.

Barring a huge mistake from Barack himself or his wife and surrogates, he is poised to take both Texas & Ohio to the shock & suprise of everyone.. - This will be a "Shock & Awe" moment.

Stay tuned.

@Charlotte….how do you know that Obama is not a person of substance? All he can do at this point is give speeches just like Hillary. He can only tell you what he believes and what he wants to do at this stage in the election process….he cannot act on these things until he becomes president.

I just don't understand where people are coming to the conclusion that Obama is not a person of substance. Prove it!

Pompous? He won the Wisconsin primary by 17 points! His speech was the more important of the two. She knew when he would be coming out to speak and she chose to speak into his speech. If anyone is owed an apology it's Barack Obama. Hillary should apologize, first for not being graceful enough to admit she lost and congratulate the winner during her speech, and secondly for taking up his time.

Wolf, Hillary is NO Bill! He may have made his comeback well enough, but he had the likeability factor going for him. Hillary's negatives compared to Bill's are very high.

Thanks, Wolf, for reminding us of the sleezy Clinton years and their politics. Maybe Hillary should go back to Ark. and run for something since she IS a carpetbagger.

Bill's comeback in 1992 was due in large part to a sizable block of voters that Hillary just simply do not have.

Talk about being pompous! Hillary Clinton went into this race believing it was a sure thing.

Fortunately, not all Americans agree.

As for me, if Clinton wins the nomination through her negative attacks, I'll not vote Democrat for the first time in my life.

I agree we shouldn't count Hillary out in the sense that she's still around to do plenty of damage to Obama.

I have to question when Blitzer says "Obama has won ten contests in a row — almost all of them by significant margins." His worst showing was a win by 17 percent.

Wolf,

Senator's Clinton and Obama have both announced that they will commence a phased withdrawal of our troops from Iraq within the first year of their presidency.

During tomorrow nights debate, would you and Campbell Brown please ask Senator's Clinton and Obama what their plans are for redeploying our troops to Afghanistan in order to continue the fight against Al Qaeda; what will be the level of troop involvement in Afghanistan in terms of actual numbers; and how they believe that redeployment will affect Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Syria, Iran and Israel, and what they anticipate the perception of the people in those countries will be towards the United States following the redeployment?

Shane from NY wrote, and I like these comments:

"Ok Obama was involved in the Senate's drive for improved border security and immigration reform. In 2005, he co-sponsored the "Secure America and Orderly Immigration Act" introduced by Sen. John McCain(interesting right). I'm just starting, he was also involved in adding three amendments to Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act in 2006.

There was "Lugar-Obama" which expands the Nunn-Lugar cooperative threat reduction concept to conventional weapons, including shoulder-fired missiles and anti-personnel mines. There was the "Coburn-Obama Transparency Act" which provided oversight for our government website and where funds were being allocated(keeping them honest).

He is a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee which focused on trying to curb wmd's. Obama worked with Russ Feingold to eliminate gifts of travel on corporate jets by lobbyists to members of Congress and require disclosure of bundled campaign contributions under the "Honest Leadership and Open Government Act". Sounds like he is just talking about fighting lobbyist.

He also introduced the "Iraq War De-Escalation Act" to put a cap on our troops. He sponsored 2008 Defense Authorization Act which provided safeguards for our disabled veterans(he cares about our troops). So I think we can stop talking about his experience now. Seems like he did a lot in Congress

The media is generating a lot of Obama's support. You're being unfair like cutting Hillary's speech while allowing Obama the opportunity to exercise his "verbal diarrhea" just as he always does. I think he's all talk and no substance and John McCain will beat him in November. I believe he has gotten where he is by so much emphasis on him by the media. People better wake up and take note.

Rad article, Wolf! I'm glad you reminded us of all the scandals surrounding the Clintons. That really make wish I had voted for her now….NOT!

Charlotte, reagan democrates left the party a long time ago and betrayed us; go ahead and make my day; I am Obama all the way to the white house.

Great points, Wolf. But, that's President Clinton's record…his comeback. Senator Clinton has yet to run how her own merits; she's a modern day carpet bagger and reminds me of a whiny, old mom who won't shut up. Boy, I'm starting to sound like Cafferty!

Apology to Clinton? She lost! She should have take that time to congrtulate Obama, but instead she totally ignored the fact that she got blown out in Wisconsin, didn't even mention it, and proceeded to make her regular stump speech. Sorry, Obama won, he gets priority.

Thank You Wolf! Is it so hard or so bad to give Hillary a bit of good exposure? Her voters really get upset when we watch the media always beaming on Obama. I am one of her supporters and I have watched CNN more than ever since this political campaigne has started. I like CNN but hey you guys have to consider us viewers who do still carry hope for her. Personality and character doesn't keep our country safe and in good economics. It is experience, wisdom, and powerfull back up that gets the job done right. Now is not the time for all the great talk of change, we need some one who will do what they say, not say what they will do. Nothing against Barak, just need more experience.

Right on jimF!!!!!

To jimf, CNN doesn't but Fox covered this. They had reports that Obama got wind of Clinton's speech so decided to cut her off. His camp was not happy he had to say some of this as it was to be for the debate.

She has a formidable Clinton machine, built over 20 years. True. The only problem is that machine is failing to show up or the machine has lost the sharpness or became rusty.

If Obama lost 10 primaries/caucuses in a row, the media would have written him off. For Clinton, even after 10 straight loss, CNN is waiting the machine to start somewhere.

With all respect to Wolf Blitzer… we all know how much you personally like Hillary Clinton but please let your personal preferences out of your journalistic job!!! We all know that CNN anchors can get out of their way to attack Obama, last example is Lou Dobbs, who after saying on the air that Bill Clinton was personally calling him to support Hillary, he is now attacking Barack and Michelle every time he has… Come on… where are not dumb! we know how to conect the dots… I feel sorry for Lou's viewers!

Rad article, Wolf! I'm glad you reminded us of all the scandals surrounding the Clintons. That really makes me wish i had voted for her now…NOT!

@JimF….why should anyone apologize for cutting Hillary off during her speech? I believe i've seen them do this before…not directly to Mrs. Clinton but cutting off the person who is giving the speech in order to hear the 'winner's' speech. Barack was the winner of the night, he was preparing to give his speech, and it's only right that CNN would turn the camera's to him to give the winner the spotlight.

If Obama wins, what will happen to all the Democrats who voted for HILLARY in CA, NY & NJ? Will they support Obama? I don't think so! At least if Hillary wins, these big blue states will back her up. I need someone who brings substance to the table- GO HILLARY!

Well I understand that CNN is bias for Obama for a while now, it's not new.

I think is unproffesional from their part.

Re: Clintons possible "comeback" - they did not have the forces to deal with now that they had a few years ago.

Barack Obama and the spirtual changes taken place in America are going to be too much for them to overcome. The Clintons style of politics are not acceptable any longer. America needs Obama more than he needs it.

Thank you Wolf, for coming up with some thing of a positive for Hillary. I think she can do it. God bless us all!

Why is it that the Media is spinning in favor of Hillary Clinton? Is it because she is a "player" and will protect the status quo better?

Go Obama!!

"The fact is: no automatic delegate is required to cast a vote on the basis of anything other than his or her best judgment about who is the most qualified to be president."

The above is a quote from HRC. I really get irritated when I see stuff like this! What do these college grads not understand about the meaning of the word "represent" ? I'm certain that Jefferson would vomit if he were alive today to see this.

Average Joe: Stop the Shameless Self-Promotion

I'm an regular CNN.com reader. I have to say that it gets really annoying reading headlines like "Blitzer: Don't count Hillary Clinton out," or "Dobbs: Kick Immigrants Out." Really, the headlines without the names are sufficient.

Wolf, I hope your right about Hillary bouncing back. I had HOPE for 7 years that this current President would turn things around but he didn't. I don't need another 7 of HOPE without SOLUTIONS. Hillary 08

I think it's funny that Clinton supporters are outraged that CNN (along with every other news channel covering the election) switched to Obama's speech in the middle of Hillary's speech. While it is common to show the entire concession speech of the losing candidate and the victory speech of the winning candidate, not once did Hillary even mention Wisconsin, thank her supporters there or congratulate Obama on his victory (which is the customary thing to do). When it became clear she wasn't going to do that, the speech ceased to be a concession speech and turned into a regular stump speech. CNN has no obligation to, nor should they, televise a stump speech. They did the right thing and switched to Obama who gave another great speech. I would call it a "victory" speech, but when it comes to Obama, what else could it be?

Mr. Blitzer if we can't count her out than can you please let us know how She can stop Obama? I feel the only thing that can help her is if Obama falls from grace. Which can happen, but other than that she can't stop him. The momentum is too strong. I am a Obama supporter but I do believe he has a long, long way to go.

Clinton needs to stop slinging mud if she wants a chance. The negative campaign is a turn off and will ensure Obama a democratic nomination. At this point, Clinton has a cliff to climb if she wants a chance at winning.

It's so nice to hear people say experience and substance is important. Unfortunately, I think it may be too late for Senator Clinton. The media bias towards Obama and the public's rapture with a "messiah" has all helped them fail to realize this election is really very important. Well everyone has a legacy and it will remain to be seen who was right and who was wrong should Obama go on to be President. I am quite sure the media will so crazy for Obama even when he sneezes and the American people will swoon and faint over him even if by chance he cannot accomplish all that he promised to accomplish within the 1st year of his Presidency. I know that no candidate can accomplish everything they promised but I still think Mrs Clinton is pragmatic and practical in her solutions for America. One thing is for sure, if Obama should become President he will then surely be part of an establishment which he is so clearly trying to distance himself from. It remains to be seen what MSNBC and CNN will cover if Obama cannot deliver on any of his promises if he should become President.

Yah! Yah! to that one!

Look. If she wanted her whole speech broadcast, she should have won. Was it poor sportsmanship to step on her speech? Yeah, it was. But I suspect he was just sick of all the low blows she was throwing and decided to get some getback. Don't hate the player, hate the game.

Also, what I just can't seem to understand is that so many Clinton supporters talk about Obama's lack of substance. His policies are similar to Clinton's. The main difference between the two is in style not substance. He doesn't talk policy on the stump where she does, but his website outlines all of his positions and issues.

Wolf, I am truly perplexed by the almost mesmerized adulation being shown for Obama. He says nothing and and Hillary and Mc Cain are right with they say words are nice but where is the substance. I have been a life long Democrat and for the first time in my life I will vote for a Republican (while I hold my nose) if Obama is the nominee. We need a president who has a plan and has the experience to deal with the multitude and magnitude of problems he or she would face in November, By the way I agree with you, do not count Hillary out!!!!!!

All the cable stations showed the rest of her speech. I did think Obama's was too long, but Clinton also came on late and it was clear that she was not even going to talk about the election, much less concede. Obama was the winner, and they were right to switch to him. I do wish he would have kept his speech to 20 minutes.

Obama was in a stadium with 20k people, and his people had planned on him speaking on a certain schedule.

Charlotte - most national polls show Obama winning against McCain, and show Hillary losing to him. I personally think that with all her negatives and the wide swath of scandals that she and Bill have been in, Hillary is unelectable.

But I am shocked that someone would vote to extend Bush's disasterous presidency (which is McCain's plan) just to make a point.

In Obama's speech from Houston, Texas last night, he talked about slavery and the Martin Luther King march. But if the Clinton campaign just mentions the name Jesse Jackson they are hit by the media for playing the race card. So who do you really think is playing the race card? My opinion is the only real change Obama is wanting is the change from white president to black president.

Hmmm… Hard for me to buy this comparison between Bill and Hilary, Mr. Blitzer. Logic says that by now, the only way she could win is by cheating. Similar, but then again the comparison fails: last time Bill cheated, he had a good time!

Clinton came back to win the 1996 presidential election because his opponent was Bob Dole. Hillary, for the nomination, is facing Barack Obama. Quite a difference in how the opponents stack up. Plus Bill had charisma and was a very good speaker. Hillary sounds like she is yelling - her voice grates on people and she definitely is not appealing to the eye.

Can anyone tell me what is insightful about Wolf's post? Thanks for the history lesson Wolf, but what does this have to do with Clinton v. Obama. Clinton is done. Her message does not resonate even with those that are supposed to be her core supporters. The HRC campaign have been grasping at straws for months now, they can't articulate an attack on Obama that people accept.
Polls show that people think he is most qualified to be commander in chief … wasn't that the lynchpin of her argument.
At this point she has to go negative to make up ground … but what makes you think that going negative is going to work now.
Don't be afraid to say it, Clinton lost.

CNN besides the everyday beatings that you give Hillary the least you could have done was played her speech to its entirety. Arent you supposed to present all the facts and let the voters decide????

It does seem to be consistent that Obama is hailed as the second coming and Clinton is treated very poorly. I have a gut feeling that if Obama gets the nomination the Republican Party will celebrate…..

There we go again with this crap. Talk about media bias. If Obama had lost 10 in a row, the MSM will have hit the nail on his coffin by the 5th loss. If Obama lost in SC, the race would have been over then. Now you tell me don't count them out? The only folks giving the clinton's a lifeline is the MSM. Fundamentally, they're biased in favor of the Clintons.

Obama was written off last fall even before the first vote was cast. The reason being because Hillary had called him naive and irresponsible. The MSM piled on at that time. he had to claw his way back up.

bottom line, this race is essentially over. If Hillary doesn't win both Ohio and TX decisively, this race is essentially over. Give me a break!

You have a title that says Hillary but discuss Bill, thus perpetuating your myth that she is nothing without her husband. Hardy har har….

You got your wish and wiped her off the face of the map. Congrats.

I am a Hillary supporter but I want to congratulate Obama on a great campaign and his wins. He certainly has sparked and set a tone with many people.

Obama is a good man but not there yet in experience. He has good writers and policy makers and everything looks good on paper. However what happens when he sits behind that big desk and everything comes at him at once? As Perot says the president often lives in a bubble and only knows reality as what his people feed him.

We have two wars and a bad economy. It is the wrong time to place a man in office just because it makes history. We need strong, smart leadership. Hillary knows the job, she has seen it from Bill's administration for 8 years, she knows what to do. She has gone up against big pharma and knows the battle.

Dont gamble your healthcare, jobs even lives away on what looks good. Go with what you know is the solution, Hillary.

I also agree with both previous comments. CNN did cut out her speech and that was wrong and extremely biased. Whatever happened to objective journalism? If Obama gets the nomination I am definately voting for McCain. I too do not believe in sensationalism. Bush was elected by these same sensationalists and weve seen what became of that.

Wow, yes Bill may have come back in New Hampshire but we're WAY past that now (by the way, Hillary also "came back" in New Hampshire but that's old news). For her to be faltering now is a huge problem: not to mention it's almost mathematically impossible for her to make up the lost ground without a huge mistake by Obama. But it is kind of funny that Blitzer basically helps Obama here by outlining all the scandals that we have almost forgotten the Clintons have been through…

And would you zealous supporters get real? What are the news agencies supposed to do when her speech is delayed and then the WINNER of the night's primary starts his? Just forget his speech? And was her speech "new"? It wasn't at all. And I don't care what anyone thinks about "substance" and "accomplishments": if you didn't spend so much time on CNN.com blogs spewing nonsense you could go to the candidate's websites and, in Barack Obama's case, read 64 PAGES worth of substance. Just because he gives a good speech doesn't mean he DOESN'T also have something to back it up. That's the point everyone seems to be missing here.

I agree with Wolf's comments. I am also dismayed at the lemming-like following that Obama has engendered. I have watched each debate and have seen his speeches numerous times on TV. Each week, he seems to become more arrogant. As a contrast to Hillary Clinton who speaks about her detailed specific plans, he seems to simply say the word "change" over and over as well as "they said we couldn't do it".(in "preachertalk"). There is absolutely no substance to this man and I cannot for the life of me see why anyone believes that he is fit to become the leader of the free world. Lest you think that I'm a Clinton democrat.. my final comment is that I'm a registered republican.

JIM & CHARLOTTE youd rather be lead into a 1,000 year war in iraq and recession than vote for a logical thinker & leader ? You two and those like u are the reason America's reputation and economy are in the toilet. But dont worry … smart logical voters like myself will save you from yourself and elect OBama so he can improve the futures of our children. USA !!! USA !!! USA !!!

It is nice to hear something somewhat positive about Hillary Clinton. The press and news media has been so negative. Adding to the feeding frenzy of the Obama hype. It is a little tenuous right now - but I would not count Hillary out either. Thanks.

No No No. If the tables were turned and Obama had lost 10 races in a row there wouldn't even be a discussion of a come back. The media pile on for Obama to get out now would be so intense.

Yesterday is was Ohio and Texas. This morning it is now West Virginia and other states that will save her delegate losses. Do the math people.

Hillary Clinton lived by the machine, and is now dying by the machine. She has no native popularity. She had zero experience coming to the New York Senatorial post. She was a candidate of conveyance for those who wanted access to power. They used her to get in and they thought they needed her to win the Presidency. Obama did the opposite. He took his message from the ground up, and made the machine listen. The machine knows what's best for it, and most of all it wants to win. The machine just dropped Hillary like a hot potato…

You speak of the "Clintons" as if Hillary and Bill were running together. Do people of the United States want a president whose strength is having an ex-president for a husband? Is this Bill Clinton's way to get a third term?

I marvel that literally every available article and analysis written since last night continues to talk about "what Clinton needs to do to come back" or "not to count her out". I've never been a conspiracy theorist, but it looks an awful lot like encouragement for Clinton voters. Can we get one story about what Obama needs to do to keep winning states by blowout margins, to win the nomination? Can we get some analysis or comment about how he has run a vastly superior campaign to that of Clinton, while not engaging in ridculous accusations (plagarism) negative attacks ("why won't he debate me?") or misleading advertising ("She's worked the night shift, too.")
BTW - in '96 Clinton was up against Bob Dole, who was seen as another ancient white man (are you listening John McCain) looking to bring us back to the past - no one wanted that and Clinton won rather easily. As to Hillary's senate campaign - she ran as the wife of the popular former president, at a time when many democrats were still furious at the theft of the 2000 presidential election. She also ran in a state that reliably votes democratic, AND she ran against Rick Lazio, not exactly the greatest candidate we've seen here in the Empire State…

Not that his come back kid Wolf was New Hampshire. We are way past New Hampshire this season. Yes, mathematically she can return to a dead heat or slightly ahead.

I believe though that the Wisconsin victory that was much larger than the pendents predicted. I predict Hillary is through. But it's so close if I were her, I would not quit till the very end.

ok lets test this Blitzer theory on March 4 at 8 p.m eastern. I think election is won with mind not with machine. ok let's see how clinton machine works in the days to come. I think this machine didnt work for 25 states that Obama won. How would it work for just two states? i think she is out. anyway Blitzer will not accept it but i am sure he will announce Obama as the projected winner on March 4 at around 8.30 p.m. eastern.

Wolf is still in love with Hillary and wants to see her as President.

She can do nothing wrong in Wolf's eyes.

What about unbiased reporting?????

Obama will win to be the worst president in the US history.
I don't want to miss that.

GO OBAMA!!!

CNN, as every other source of media, is driven by ratings, not loose forms of etiquette. To suggest that CNN should apologize for switching to Obama's speech is about as silly as suggesting that criticizing the president should be considered treason.

From Illinois:

Finally……., someone calling it as it is, plain & simple !

Hey Charlotte,

Go to Obama's web-site if you want "substance".

Apology for clinton???? Are you crazy .. he won.. you earn tv time.. you just don't get it. when the patriots lost the superbowl did we focus on them.. we payed attention to the giant's. He planned to come out after he won.. he had 20,000 people waiting. CNN is is doing a great job covering the election. If hillary wins… then we should pay attention to her.. did anyone see ron paul speak yesterday.. come hilary.. if u win u win.. but if u lose do it with pride and admit defeat.. that goes to the hillary supporters as well !!!

You cannot fault the networks for cutting away from Clinton's speech last night. She was the loser and Obama the winner, what were the networks supposed to do?

The "lengthy" argument holds absolutely no water - you think CNN got a copy of his speech before he went on stage and knew that it was going to be 45 minutes long?

Because Obama has a command of the language and is talented at inspiring people to follow him, does not mean he has no facts behind his positions. He clearly is not just a pretty face - read his book. Or watch him debate. There are facts and substance there. It is easy these days to fall into the trap of false choices spewed out by the media and the political candidates. I believe all three candidates have well thought out positions on the issues. The question for us as Americans is determine which is best, in our view, for this country. Yes, too often in this day and age a pretty face means an empty head. But not this time. Invest some time in exploring the possibility.

wolf blitzer.. are you an unbiased newsman or analyst? … you can't be both… your reporting has clearly favored hillary from the beginning.

It is nearly impossible for her to catch Obama, and even if she does and somehow pulls out the nomination, then the dems would be handing victory to McCain. Hillary does not have the ability to pull in enough independents and moderate republicans. Leaving the republicans in charge for another four to eight years would be criminal. The party needs to begin uniting around who can beat McCain….. and that, without doubt, is Obama.

I agree that CNN was a bit rude cutting off Hillary's speech. I don't need another cheer leader in my life. I need a can-do person. As you are speaking now in regards to senior voters. I am voting early for Hillary. Speeches by Obama are getting very tiring. Same old stuff and saying nothing.

Nobody wanted to hear Hillary's speech. She's got nothing going for her at this point. Obama is where the democratic party is going. His speech is what matters, not something the loser whines about, or hearing her lunatic claims that she'll still pull this off.
CNN was absolutely correct in going to Obama's speech. They shouldn't have bothered with Hillary in the first place.

The problem with all this "comeback kid" narrative is that while it certainly applies to Bill, that does not necessarily translate to Hillary. Bill had the charm and charisma to recover from set backs. Hillary seems to do worse when encountering problems. For example, bringing in Williams and going very negative actually hurt her worse in Wisconsin. She can't let her white knuckle grip off the process, and thus can't roll with the punches.

Why did Hilary fail to use her experiece to vote against the war? With 35 years of experience and still couldnt make a reasonable judgement.Remeber Bush is well experienced.So Hilary should not even mention her experience…

Dear Americans,
I am watching very careful your politics for the last 30 years.
I can not understand you.
Now you are DESPREAD and you are grabbing the "change".
Simple, you have $10 in your pocket, how you are going to spend $20? By borrowing from China?!!
America and the world has a big economical and political challenges rite now. It is YOU to chose.

Your dilemma is: new and very , very fogy / trust me on it; I still couldn't understand Obama, unless he leads the country to Socialism/
or to restore your economy and international political power by choosing the known , experienced and respected?

Heal you wounds first. If he has something to give to his country and the world will come, you are too yang any how. Help now to heal the country, do not walk over the one how has serve very , very well to America. why he is so eager? I like dreaming, dreaming is good and leads you ahead, but the question is "Is he the one?"

Hello, once you did a huge mistake: you vote for Bush-twice. Seven yours ago, he was the One. Think , what did you do to yourself and the entire world with your irrational choice. Or my be you do not care that Russia and China are laughing . My be you deserve to suffer a little bit more, but we Canadians care.

Hillary has been losing and to date has to acknowlege that. Why should Obama let her have free air time? Letting her drone on and on without even the courtesy of mentioning her loss would be a stupid tactical move.

i think 2 weeks is plenty of time for Hillary to get her message across and for people to see the Obama campaign for what it is…i personally am tired of the same speech which is partly not his. change and hope okay great change what hope for what??? Hillary is talking about getting stuff done and Obama is talking about how great what he is doing is. the republicans will tare him apart in November, McCain is already doing it and its already working !!!!!

Dear Wolf to answer your question I am a independent voter, college educated,senior woman and I support Senator Clinton because I believe she is the best candidate to get this country out of the mess we are in. Also why don't you ask Senator Obama why he wouldn't put his hand over his heart in a proper civilian salute to our flag! Oh I am also a air force veteran.

CNN doesn't have to apologize in this situation, and to believe it does lends an air of entitlement to those who support the Clinton campaign. Her vote to authorize the war and her support of NAFTA (and subsequent "flip flopping" into going against it) should be enough for us as voters to NOT vote for her. And anyone who thinks Obama is pompous and not McCain is incredibly dense and has not done enough homework on McCain. He can be as pompous as they come in terms of his tone and dealings with other. If you're going to not support Obama, at least be more intelligent in your reasons they spouting superficial lines made for lazy thinkers.

Obama's campaign has been just like every other politician's — inflate your own accomplishments, distort your opponents' records, intentionally take statements out of context, promise the moon to people if they'll vote for you, etc. — that isn't change, that's more of the same, which essentially makes Barack Obama a liar and a hypocrite — just like every other politician. He fails his own standard… how ironic is that?

I voted for one Republican in my life — Thommy Thompson, who was the governor of WI at the time when I lived there. I voted for him because he was moderate and had experience; McCain also matches those criteria. Experience trumps rhetoric, known trumps the unknown. Obama loses on all counts. If Hillary isn't the democratic nominee, I'll be voting for McCain.

After weeks of waiting I am still waiting to hear what "change" Obama is going to do. I still hope Hillary can make a come back but if she doesn't then we will have another 4 years of bad luck in the White House.

JimF, why should CNN apologize? Every other network did the same thing. Seeing the pattern??

Thanks Wolf, one somewhat positive comment regarding Hillary Clinton….. followed up by dredged up, sick of hearing about it, old news about her husband. Try a positive spin once in a while, you might like it!

In the meantime, maybe you could spin a little about Michelle Obama, no one seems to want to talk about HER negative attitude regarding "the other candidate" or how she's just now proud of her country….. in the words of Bill Clinton (since you loved to bring him up)….. GIVE ME A BREAK!

They gave recognition to the WINNER " OBAMA". If Hillary would have won (once again, sorry Hillary for losing) they would have cut off Obama for the winner. Obama is the winner, therefor people want to hear from the WINNER!!!!

YES WE CAN!!! OBAMA 08

To Charlotte,

Bush, a cheerleader. McCain, a cheerleader. Yes and Yes.
Obama not.
I bet you voted for Bush. And now you are going to vote for
another of Bush cronies.

CNNs fairness towards the race is questionable. You are always highlighting Senator Obama and downplay Senator Clinton. Your fair and unbiased approach is no longer there. Will you even get around to comparing their senate careers or is it over by your judgment? I'm an Independent voter who will be voting McCain before I vote for Obama. So far he has been a good CHEERLEADER at the rally but has not shown he can even be effective.

They were cutting away from what should have been a concession speech (instead, another arrogant attempt to ignore yet another one of Obama's blowout victories) to a victory speech. Hillary, as the clear loser, should have scheduled her speech more appropriately.

i think you are being a serious offender comparing Obama with Bush..
you had better apologise on that…Dont worry ..its a bitter pill to swallow!! an afroman on 10 -0 to the biggest US political Dynasty machine. Give it up Give it up.. Go Obama.. Go Obama ..i feel like am fired up and i know charlotte is too
see you in Texas to for the true colours!!!

Scandal after scandal!!! Hopefully the new scandal the Clintons will cook-up with Flo and Mich will be the last! This generation is not moved by the Clinton name. We will chose the leaders of our future and we refuse to be governed by our grandparents and parents misdeeds!!!!!

Wolf, I miss the days when a journalist didn't offer opinions just facts. The landscape has changed so much that people who used to be thought of as un-biased journalist now serve as pundits. I find it unacceptable personally, and wish you and others who want to hold the title of journalist move away from this type of journalism. If you want to be an entertainer then just do that and get a show like Chris Matthew's Hardball.

It's a sad day when people are talking more about the journalist/reporter/anchor than they are their subject.

HILLARY WILL PREVAIL,WHY NOW DID BLITZER TODAY FINALLY OUT WITH SOMETHING POSITIVE ON THE CLINTONS ITS NOT OVER ,NO WAY ITS ONLY JUST BEGUN, SO YOU HANG ON FOR THE ROLLER COASTER RIDE YOURSELF, THANKS I DIDNT KNOW YOU KNEW HOW TO BE FAIR.

C'mon, Wolf! Your secret enamorment of Hillary Clinton is so apparent, and you have been cowtowing to the Clintons for years now stopping just short of having your nose up their tushes all along.
Be honest and tell the public how badly you'll miss them being in the daily news with all their sleaze and scandal. I guess you'll have to start reporting the real news along with the other mainstream media.
It's been so long since any of you have done your jobs, you may need to retrain your journalistic skill set and senses.

Remember you and your investigative journalist (???) buddies complicitly marching us into the war in Iraq along with the Bush administration before any of you even did your homework. You swallowed that bugled mess along with all the Clinton trash back in the 90s.

Thats because Wolf cannot see the light and lives in the same world as Hillary, STATUS QUO

It has appeared to me the entire political season that CNN has had a hands off stance