I cannot understand why you keep deleting my posts and you would publish racist posts from someone like that 'Mad In Texas' jerk!!!!

Anyway,

I will try to post it again.

Hillary the truth hurts! You did support NAFTA! You did say that you would go after people's wages for healthcare! America is over you Hillary!!!! The truth of the matter is, you thought that you were owed the White House, and you are not owed anything!!! I know people that have said that if you win the nomination, they'd vote for McCain. I will not go that far! I would never vote for "100 year McCain" who came out and said that he hopes another leader would die, but I hope that you do not get the nomination and continue the same politics of Washington!

HRC she's the definition of Liers

What a disgusting, wrong, dishonest, and dirty political hit job.

Also, if she doesn’t plan on forcing people to purchase health care... then maybe she should not use the term mandate..

PS... Hillary you are not a good actress and you did not just see these flyers... they have been out for weeks... but nice way to start drama. Just what we need... More drama from the Clintons

Main Entry: mandate
Function: transitive verb
Inflected Forms: man•dat•ed; man•dat•ing
: to make mandatory or required

Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Law, © 1996 Merriam-Webster, Inc.

Obama she claim "Meet me in Denver" as he rides his way to the nomination.

But think of this:
Hillary can parade her record as it relates to first lady "35 years of experience and "I've been tested". However, if it's something Bill did wrong or made a mistake, she states "It wasn't me"!!! talk about double standards!! She never stops!!!

Nafta was signed by your husband Bill and you supported it... and you have not explained how everyone will have health insurance.. what if they wish to opt-out? can they?

Outraged – please.

and stop with the standing ovation – that was for both candidates after the conclusion of a great debate. geeez.

she started this dirty mailings in Winsconsin and now Obama is dishing out same

She called Obama "a change we can xerox", and but when she is called out on her changing positions on NAFTA, Billary is crying foul!

Now she is saying meet me in Ohio; well, Obama is going to clobber you on the side of your head in Ohio, because all the charges in the mailer are TRUE!!!

Billary, PUHLEEEASE, stand for what you believe in – you voted for Iraq war, you want a mandated or forced health care, your supported NAFTA trade deals that outsource our jobs overseas!!!
Dont change your positions just to win an election!

GO OBAMA!!!!

Bill is the one that signed NAFTA after Bush 41 got it going. She admits it is not being handled correctly and wants to have it reviewed and corrected.

As far as the debate Campbell kept cutting her off so how could she say very much as she was very forceful in keeping the policy parts of the plan front and center.

Mike
Alabama

Given part of her plan is to REQUIRE Americans to have health insurance, doesn't that mean you have to have it regardless of affordability or you face fines?

It is Obama's duty to point out the differences since all of the Clinton supports seem to think he has no policy behind his speeches. His health care plan will work to make it more affordable and have a buy-in system for Americans, but will NOT require you to have your own insurance except for your children. I think that is a reasonable difference between the two.

And to those remarks about childishness, lets not forget Clinton calling him out for plagarizing his national campaign co-chair who told him to use the material and said after she pointed it out that it was no big deal. All of that refuting evidence, and she still felt the need to bring it up at the TX debate.

Now riddle me this Clinton supporters. Many people say Obama has no accomplishments. Fine. Tell me then what she has done in her 35 years of public service. Please refrain from touting things her husband accomplished while in office.

I also do not think her smirk was appropriate in her closing statement in the TX debate when she was reminding America that she stayed with her husband who had an extra-marital affair in the oval office then lied about it to the American people. Nothing funny about that at all my friends. Is that the kind of moral value we can expect in another Clinton White House?

CLINTON SUPPORTERS! GET YOURSELF TOGETHER. HER AND HER HUSBAND ALSO SUPPORTED NAFTA. STOP NEGLECTING OBAMA BECAUSE OF HIS RACE. HE IS THE CANDIDATE THAT WE NEED TO CHANGE THIS ENTIRE NATION.

CLINTONS UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE WILL SURELY BE UNIVERSAL BUT AT A GREAT COST! PLEASE DO YOUR RESEARCH!

She supported NAFTA. She said so in her book.

She supported the war in Iraq. She said so with her vote.

She has proven she does not have the judgement to be president. She has proven this over and over again.

And for the record, everything he said in the ads is true!

We need.....strenght! Hillary showed weakness when she went with the status quo....and voted for the War! she signed a death warrent for our children....Obama voted ...no! against the War!...

He should Strenght! and did not go with the status quo!

I wish Hillary would stop! the acting...ie: "tears"..."emotional" breakdowns...we need a strong! leader....she's...too!..."emotional"!

But if she wants to keep high-lighting her weaknesses and boo-hoo'ing because Obama is pointing out her errors in judgement, then let her do what makes her happy.

Most of Hillary's voting record (Bill's too, for that matter) and the issues they support are abyssmal at best, terrifying at worst. In numerous speeches she has said that she would "garnish wages, if need be" in order to put her "universal health care" program in place. Garnish wages? That's not "universal," that's communism. Then there is NAFTA, which anyone with good memory function recalls both Clintons supported vehemently. NAFTA, which has increased Latin American trade corruption ten-fold. Plus their is the fact that while a senator she voted FOR the Patriot Act; she voted to read your emails, tap your phones, etc. And of course there her archive, which she and Bill refuse to release to the public – and now her tax reports too. All of this is public information, readily available via a good Google search. For all these reasons and many more, I have never understood the hype about her. It seems so Orwellian. I don't even really understand how she can run as a Democrat, but that says much about how much our party has sold itself – spinelessly – hook line and sinker.

I don't think Obama's ad is such a shameful action, considering all of the immature allegations Hillary as shot his way. I'm still waiting on someone to call her on all the so-called "plagiarism," in her campaign. "It takes a village," Maya Angelou. And the direct Edwards rip-offs. Also, it would be nice if someone would ask her to spell out her 35 years of service. Does sleeping next to an American president for 8 years while he is in office constitutue "experience'? In that case, all the wives of politicians should take over.

And how is pointing out an IMPORTANT flaw in someone's policies or ideas going against his change platform. If I recall correctly, you STOLE his "Yes We Can" platform in Wisconsin when you released a mailer that attacked HIS healthcare plan.

I smell a hypocrite...

Look at the facts – there are a lot of people out there making $50 – $75 k who would be perfectly able to afford the types of insurance that these campaigns are offering. Under Obama's plan, if you don't feel like it, you don't have to get it. Then later when you get sick, you do. How does he plan to force THEM to pay for it, if this is such a big problem?

What makes King Obama so great that he does not have to defend his plans down to the last detail? He can just say "No war in Iraq, and health care for all" and we are supposed to dance in the streets? His plans are actually much weaker and more naive than Hillary's (on health care and foreign policy).

Obama 08!

That being said, I am disappointed that Barack went negative like this. He had the lead, he has the momentum; he really didn't need to do this.

Sen. Clinton’s continued belittlement of Sen. Obama via her claims that his campaign is all empty promises fails to impress me. Sen. Obama’s blueprint for America (available on his website) does outline substantive policies that he has developed.

Furthermore, I personally believe it to be both arrogant and ignorant of Sen. Clinton to claim that she has it all figured out, and that her plan is the paramount solution. NOBODY has all the answers to the problems that America faces today. The most important characteristic of the next president is going to be their ability to work together with the best minds America has to offer to reach solutions.

I don’t want someone who is “ready to be commander-in-chief on day one.” Someone like that is far too eager to become a “leader.” Once someone gets it in their head that they’re a “leader” the opinions of everyone else fade away and they indignantly thumb their nose at 30% approval ratings as they continue risking the lives of Americans all over the world for the benefit of no one, whilst they run the economic and intellectual future of this country into the ground back home.

Give me a president who is cognizant of the fact that they are in office not to be a “leader,” but to be a REPRESENTATIVE in a government that is of, for, and by the people.

Give me Barack Obama.