Comments on: Blitzer: How much time should Nader get? http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/ All politics, all the time Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:07:36 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Dave http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-616222 Dave Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:47:03 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-616222 Nader is the worst of the nanny state socialists who'd put the US economy on even shakier ground than we are now. Give him equal time and watch his candidacy vanish into thin air. Nader is the worst of the nanny state socialists who'd put the US economy on even shakier ground than we are now. Give him equal time and watch his candidacy vanish into thin air.

]]> By: Charlie http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-616221 Charlie Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:46:53 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-616221 His entry into the candidate field has been matched with the movement of support of every intelligent, rational individual I know. Please give him more time - he's one of the few to acknowledge with truth the issues we face. His entry into the candidate field has been matched with the movement of support of every intelligent, rational individual I know. Please give him more time – he's one of the few to acknowledge with truth the issues we face.

]]> By: jim williams http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-616219 jim williams Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:46:23 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-616219 F ralph nader. He should be given zero airtime. He's obviously only doing this because he wants attention and to feel important. he probably just wants to throw a wrench in the whole process. If he was so worried about this before, why announce it just now? he needs to stick to consumer rights and leave politics alone. F ralph nader. He should be given zero airtime. He's obviously only doing this because he wants attention and to feel important. he probably just wants to throw a wrench in the whole process. If he was so worried about this before, why announce it just now? he needs to stick to consumer rights and leave politics alone.

]]> By: B Goldstein http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-616197 B Goldstein Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:44:58 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-616197 Ralph Nader running for president, after the disaster he helped institute in 2000, is nothing more than an attempt to pat his own back. He is trying to prove a point with no thought for what his point will do for the well-being of his country. I hardly find that "presidential behavior." He knows he cannot win. He also knows that his part in this crucial election could be a repeat of his last attempt. No candidate is perfect, but we live in a democracy and we choose the best from what we've got. I have no issue with him calling on the democratic candidates to support aspects of his own platform. Let them meet and have him offer his support to the candidate he likes best. If he really wanted to run, he would have put his hat in a year ago. He could have backed out respectfully when it was clear he could no longer win, having again brought his ideas into the public forum, much like Dennis Kucinich did. If he wants to serve in public office, he should run for a race he can win instead of hoping like an egomaniac that he can have another 15 minutes of fame. I forgive him for 2000. 2008 is just an ego-trip. So, to answer your question, Wolf, he is not running in any primary. Right now, he is insignificant. Come September, you have no choice but to let him dig the democratic party a few feet into the ground. Your job is to cover the news. Unfortunately, that means giving him the due he probably ought not deserve. Let's hope he comes to his senses before then. Ralph Nader running for president, after the disaster he helped institute in 2000, is nothing more than an attempt to pat his own back. He is trying to prove a point with no thought for what his point will do for the well-being of his country. I hardly find that "presidential behavior." He knows he cannot win. He also knows that his part in this crucial election could be a repeat of his last attempt. No candidate is perfect, but we live in a democracy and we choose the best from what we've got. I have no issue with him calling on the democratic candidates to support aspects of his own platform. Let them meet and have him offer his support to the candidate he likes best. If he really wanted to run, he would have put his hat in a year ago. He could have backed out respectfully when it was clear he could no longer win, having again brought his ideas into the public forum, much like Dennis Kucinich did. If he wants to serve in public office, he should run for a race he can win instead of hoping like an egomaniac that he can have another 15 minutes of fame. I forgive him for 2000. 2008 is just an ego-trip.

So, to answer your question, Wolf, he is not running in any primary. Right now, he is insignificant. Come September, you have no choice but to let him dig the democratic party a few feet into the ground. Your job is to cover the news. Unfortunately, that means giving him the due he probably ought not deserve. Let's hope he comes to his senses before then.

]]> By: Adam http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-616190 Adam Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:44:30 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-616190 If he gets .4% of the vote, give him .4% of the coverage. Savvy democrats will have learned their lesson from Florida 2000, and will marginalize Nader as early as possible. Besides, in a field where McCain and Obama are already hoping to grab independents, Nader will get even less than he got in 2000. He doesn't belong at debates. No offense Mr. Nader, but what have you done lately? For Gen X voters, like me, Nader is little more than a distraction--correction, an old distraction. If he gets .4% of the vote, give him .4% of the coverage.

Savvy democrats will have learned their lesson from Florida 2000, and will marginalize Nader as early as possible. Besides, in a field where McCain and Obama are already hoping to grab independents, Nader will get even less than he got in 2000. He doesn't belong at debates.

No offense Mr. Nader, but what have you done lately? For Gen X voters, like me, Nader is little more than a distraction–correction, an old distraction.

]]> By: Larry G http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-616157 Larry G Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:41:44 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-616157 Can third party candidates take votes away from Democrats and Republicans? Of course they can! Mainly because there exists a certain group of voters in this country, myself included, that are sick of the "same old, same old" in Washington. While I am currently an Obama supporter, I welcome, with open arms, diverse opinions and anyone willing to "take on the establishment." Give Nader some time. Don't stifle the views of those that confront a sick, corrupt and dying political system. Can third party candidates take votes away from Democrats and Republicans? Of course they can! Mainly because there exists a certain group of voters in this country, myself included, that are sick of the "same old, same old" in Washington. While I am currently an Obama supporter, I welcome, with open arms, diverse opinions and anyone willing to "take on the establishment." Give Nader some time. Don't stifle the views of those that confront a sick, corrupt and dying political system.

]]> By: Barbara M Campbell http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-616151 Barbara M Campbell Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:41:32 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-616151 Let Nader prove voter interest by getting supporters to sign petitions. CNN can decide the number of signatures that would be appropriate (per state, for example). Let Nader prove voter interest by getting supporters to sign petitions. CNN can decide the number of signatures that would be appropriate (per state, for example).

]]> By: B Goldstein http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-616145 B Goldstein Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:41:24 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-616145 Ralph Nader running for president, after the disaster he helped institute in 2000, is nothing more than an attempt to pat his own back. He is trying to prove a point with no thought for what his point will do for the well-being of his country. I hardly find that "presidential behavior." He knows he cannot win. He also knows that his part in this crucial election could be a repeat of his last attempt. No candidate is perfect, but we live in a democracy and we choose the best from what we've got. I have no issue with him calling on the democratic candidates to support aspects of his own platform. Let them meet and have him offer his support to the candidate he likes best. If he really wanted to run, he would have put his hat in a year ago. He could have backed out respectfully when it was clear he could no longer win, having again brought his ideas into the public forum, much like Dennis Kucinich did. If he wants to serve in public office, he should run for a race he can win instead of hoping like an egomaniac that he can have another 15 minutes of fame. I forgive him for 2000. 2008 is just an ego-trip. Ralph Nader running for president, after the disaster he helped institute in 2000, is nothing more than an attempt to pat his own back. He is trying to prove a point with no thought for what his point will do for the well-being of his country. I hardly find that "presidential behavior." He knows he cannot win. He also knows that his part in this crucial election could be a repeat of his last attempt. No candidate is perfect, but we live in a democracy and we choose the best from what we've got. I have no issue with him calling on the democratic candidates to support aspects of his own platform. Let them meet and have him offer his support to the candidate he likes best. If he really wanted to run, he would have put his hat in a year ago. He could have backed out respectfully when it was clear he could no longer win, having again brought his ideas into the public forum, much like Dennis Kucinich did. If he wants to serve in public office, he should run for a race he can win instead of hoping like an egomaniac that he can have another 15 minutes of fame. I forgive him for 2000. 2008 is just an ego-trip.

]]> By: Marie http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-616113 Marie Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:39:20 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-616113 You did not post my comment so I will try again! Why are you asking us? CNN decided that Edwards should have no coverage, so he is out of the race. Hillary Clinton has a major support base, and since you cannot drop her from air time, you have shown her in every negative aspect that you can. You are pushing to get her out of the race! To your dimay, she is still in the race! And still a strong candidate! And Obama gets every positive media slant you can give him and it is almost 24/7! And then you conduct CNN polls and say he is winning! So, again, why are you asking us? You did not post my comment so I will try again!
Why are you asking us?
CNN decided that Edwards should have no coverage, so he is out of the race.
Hillary Clinton has a major support base, and since you cannot drop her from air time, you have shown her in every negative aspect that you can. You are pushing to get her out of the race! To your dimay, she is still in the race! And still a strong candidate!
And Obama gets every positive media slant you can give him and it is almost 24/7! And then you conduct CNN polls and say he is winning!
So, again, why are you asking us?

]]> By: Kim, Dallas, TX http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-616109 Kim, Dallas, TX Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:39:06 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-616109 I find his decision to run again a bit distasteful. He cannot win and he knows how he has affected the past elections. If he can't tell how he ruined our country by being the obstacle that allowed Bush to be president, then there is something very telling wrong with him. He may have good ideas, but they parallel our Democratic candidates that have put months into campaigning. I would treat him about the same as we did when Colbert tried to run. If Nader really wanted to enact change, why wait until he is into another four year term to make changes. He could act as a catalyst for change within Washington. If he really feels as though he is the only one who can do this in Washington, then he appears to be a bit disillusioned. He's 74 and hasn't done anything to make the changes as of yet. Why waste the time we could have learning about candidates and issues that really matter and not someone simply trying to appease his own ego. I find his decision to run again a bit distasteful. He cannot win and he knows how he has affected the past elections. If he can't tell how he ruined our country by being the obstacle that allowed Bush to be president, then there is something very telling wrong with him. He may have good ideas, but they parallel our Democratic candidates that have put months into campaigning. I would treat him about the same as we did when Colbert tried to run. If Nader really wanted to enact change, why wait until he is into another four year term to make changes. He could act as a catalyst for change within Washington. If he really feels as though he is the only one who can do this in Washington, then he appears to be a bit disillusioned. He's 74 and hasn't done anything to make the changes as of yet. Why waste the time we could have learning about candidates and issues that really matter and not someone simply trying to appease his own ego.

]]> By: Sharon http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-616108 Sharon Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:39:02 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-616108 Give him fair air time, he's running the same as the others are. He deserves to be heard just the same. ;) Give him fair air time, he's running the same as the others are. He deserves to be heard just the same. ;)

]]> By: YounMale http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-616095 YounMale Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:38:31 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-616095 Use a simple equation First he already lost an election so he's already out 30% Second receiving less than one percent of the vote the last time he campaigned (2004) knocks off another 20%. Finally as a person who's run for president more than four times and not won a single significant margin take 4 x 10% and knock off 40% for wasted time. That leaves 10% of the time he'd be allowed as a viable candidate. Since there are three +one candidates. He should be allowed 2.5% of time or one and a half minutes on every hour (excluding commercials) of debate. But rather than place him in the precarious position of possibly blah blah blahing over his alloted time and being forced to shut up, I suggest that a quick 90 second ad be allowed at the very beginning of each debate (prior to anything important). Use a simple equation
First he already lost an election so he's already out 30%
Second receiving less than one percent of the vote the last time he campaigned (2004) knocks off another 20%.
Finally as a person who's run for president more than four times and not won a single significant margin take 4 x 10% and knock off 40% for wasted time.
That leaves 10% of the time he'd be allowed as a viable candidate.

Since there are three +one candidates. He should be allowed 2.5% of time or one and a half minutes on every hour (excluding commercials) of debate.

But rather than place him in the precarious position of possibly blah blah blahing over his alloted time and being forced to shut up, I suggest that a quick 90 second ad be allowed at the very beginning of each debate (prior to anything important).

]]> By: Doug http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-616077 Doug Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:36:59 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-616077 This is ridiculous. I'd bet that most of the people attempting to brush Nader aside as some sort of fringe loon haven't the slightest clue regarding the policies he advocates. Why should we only get coverage of wealthy elites? Why should only those with money be given media coverage and a fair shot at the presidency? Give him equal time and let each candidate's message speak for itself. Anything less is biased censorship. This is ridiculous. I'd bet that most of the people attempting to brush Nader aside as some sort of fringe loon haven't the slightest clue regarding the policies he advocates. Why should we only get coverage of wealthy elites? Why should only those with money be given media coverage and a fair shot at the presidency? Give him equal time and let each candidate's message speak for itself. Anything less is biased censorship.

]]> By: Judith, Ridgewood, NJ http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-616076 Judith, Ridgewood, NJ Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:36:58 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-616076 He should get an occasional reference, but not be included in the debates. He only wants a forum for his views...we want to elect a president. Its a distraction. He should get an occasional reference, but not be included in the debates. He only wants a forum for his views...we want to elect a president. Its a distraction.

]]> By: Karen http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-616055 Karen Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:35:20 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-616055 Nader should get exactly enough time each day to remind the American public that we got stuck with Bush because Nader pulled votes from Gore. Nader should get exactly enough time each day to remind the American public that we got stuck with Bush because Nader pulled votes from Gore.

]]> By: lidtu http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-616052 lidtu Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:35:04 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-616052 these guy works for republicans. i dont trust these guy. these guy works for republicans. i dont trust these guy.

]]> By: Reality check http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-616048 Reality check Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:34:55 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-616048 I say turn Nadar loose on Obama, you sure don't let Hillary say anything. Oh, wait, you do let her answer sexist questions that are tied to Bill. I say turn Nadar loose on Obama, you sure don't let Hillary say anything. Oh, wait, you do let her answer sexist questions that are tied to Bill.

]]> By: news fairness (a oxymoron) http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-616043 news fairness (a oxymoron) Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:34:21 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-616043 Who elected Wolf or any other pundit to decide for us all who is the viable candidate. CNN marginalized Rep. Ron Paul & Rep. Kucinich, More galling what you did to Edwards when he attacked the holy grail of corporate greed? Non coverage and heaped scorn, shameful. Who elected Wolf or any other pundit to decide for us all who is the viable candidate.
CNN marginalized Rep. Ron Paul & Rep. Kucinich, More galling what you did to Edwards when he attacked the holy grail of corporate greed? Non coverage and heaped scorn, shameful.

]]> By: Chitown http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-616027 Chitown Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:33:12 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-616027 Please don't give this egomaniac any more media exposure because ultimately, whether you agree with him or not, he can only help the republican party. Anybody out there who votes for Nader would obviously never vote for McCain...but what they don't get is Nader vote = McCain vote!. Nader is not an idiot and must recognize this fact, yet he has no regard for the American people...keep him out! Please don't give this egomaniac any more media exposure because ultimately, whether you agree with him or not, he can only help the republican party. Anybody out there who votes for Nader would obviously never vote for McCain...but what they don't get is Nader vote = McCain vote!. Nader is not an idiot and must recognize this fact, yet he has no regard for the American people...keep him out!

]]> By: Martha http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-616025 Martha Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:33:03 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-616025 By many accounts, Ralph has a fear of germs that may well be hypochondriacal. When he was interviewed in July 2000 for CNN, his main concern before the interview was "Did you wash that [earpiece]?". According to his former editor David Sanford, Nader refuses dinner invitations from anyone with pets, because he thinks cats cause leukemia, and simply hates dogs. By many accounts, Ralph has a fear of germs that may well be hypochondriacal. When he was interviewed in July 2000 for CNN, his main concern before the interview was "Did you wash that [earpiece]?". According to his former editor David Sanford, Nader refuses dinner invitations from anyone with pets, because he thinks cats cause leukemia, and simply hates dogs.

]]> By: Oregon http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-616023 Oregon Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:32:49 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-616023 Give him the percent of time equivelent to the percent of popular vote he got in 2004. 0.4% of your time. Give him the percent of time equivelent to the percent of popular vote he got in 2004. 0.4% of your time.

]]> By: Anonymous http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-616021 Anonymous Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:32:42 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-616021 i don't trust these guy. i don't trust these guy.

]]> By: Jesse Burkhardt http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-616017 Jesse Burkhardt Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:32:37 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-616017 Nader, who has been running for president essentially since 1968, is an ego-driven buffoon who deserves NO air time. He is using the press to spread his garbage that only he is pure enough to solve all our nation's problems. He pops up every four years and gets the press to hand him a megaphone. He deserves to be ignored. He has lost all credibility, and it's absurd we are wasting time on him. Nader, who has been running for president essentially since 1968, is an ego-driven buffoon who deserves NO air time. He is using the press to spread his garbage that only he is pure enough to solve all our nation's problems. He pops up every four years and gets the press to hand him a megaphone. He deserves to be ignored. He has lost all credibility, and it's absurd we are wasting time on him.

]]> By: Kraig http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-616009 Kraig Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:32:24 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-616009 He should get JACK. This guy comes and goes. He never has been veiw as a serious candidate in any election. I wish he just go away and leave the REAL candidates to run. He should get JACK. This guy comes and goes. He never has been veiw as a serious candidate in any election. I wish he just go away and leave the REAL candidates to run.

]]> By: Anonymous http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-615994 Anonymous Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:31:40 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-615994 Ralph Nader is not a legitimate candidate. Ralph Nader is not a legitimate candidate.

]]> By: Tania http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-615986 Tania Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:31:16 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-615986 Honestly, whoever becomes president should create a position for Ralph Nader within the electoral system. He should be the registered Devil's Advocate for debates during the primaries and the general election, to ensure that the candidates actually address the issues and make substantive statements. He'll never be president, but he does an excellent job of asking the questions candidates don't want to answer. Honestly, whoever becomes president should create a position for Ralph Nader within the electoral system. He should be the registered Devil's Advocate for debates during the primaries and the general election, to ensure that the candidates actually address the issues and make substantive statements.

He'll never be president, but he does an excellent job of asking the questions candidates don't want to answer.

]]> By: Steven Rife http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-615985 Steven Rife Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:31:08 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-615985 Ralph Nader should get little if any air time. He always runs, he always loses, it appears to be a total ego trip for him to run for president. Too bad he can't think of anything better to do with his money... Ralph Nader should get little if any air time.

He always runs, he always loses, it appears to be a total
ego trip for him to run for president.

Too bad he can't think of anything better to do with his money...

]]> By: elibajai http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-615966 elibajai Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:30:13 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-615966 NOTHING!!!!! Don't waste your time on this guy. He and the people who vote for him needs psychological evaluation. NOTHING!!!!! Don't waste your time on this guy. He and the people who vote for him needs psychological evaluation.

]]> By: Jeff http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-615959 Jeff Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:29:56 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-615959 He should get 0.4% of the airtime, which he has already exceeded. He should get 0.4% of the airtime, which he has already exceeded.

]]> By: Marin http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-615952 Marin Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:29:42 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-615952 Nader is useful for bringing into focus issues that have not been in front plane so far. It would be interesting to see Obama and McCain face Nader in at least one debate, to see how they respond to his positions, and to measure his ability to influence the agenda debated. As someone who leans towards Democrats candidate, I must still confess to the possibility that there are voters with strong leftist preference, to the point that they are thinking - "If there is no Independent option, I do not care who wins the election". They should know about Nader as existing choice. There is one thing CNN should NOT do, and that is taking on it's shoulder's the 'lessons learned' from 2000 and 2004 elections, and in order not to 'compromise' chances of major candidates, rule out Nader up front. That is up to voters, not media to think of. Finally, the question that can be answered only empirically is - how would Nader influence the ratings of the debates? Nader is useful for bringing into focus issues that have not been in front plane so far. It would be interesting to see Obama and McCain face Nader in at least one debate, to see how they respond to his positions, and to measure his ability to influence the agenda debated.

As someone who leans towards Democrats candidate, I must still confess to the possibility that there are voters with strong leftist preference, to the point that they are thinking – "If there is no Independent option, I do not care who wins the election". They should know about Nader as existing choice.

There is one thing CNN should NOT do, and that is taking on it's shoulder's the 'lessons learned' from 2000 and 2004 elections, and in order not to 'compromise' chances of major candidates, rule out Nader up front. That is up to voters, not media to think of.

Finally, the question that can be answered only empirically is – how would Nader influence the ratings of the debates?

]]> By: Janann http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-615948 Janann Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:29:24 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-615948 Nader should play by the rules like everyone else, not take the shortcut. He would've gotten pounded in the primaries and would have to go away. Nader should play by the rules like everyone else, not take the shortcut. He would've gotten pounded in the primaries and would have to go away.

]]> By: Ross Cooper http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-615928 Ross Cooper Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:28:11 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-615928 Not a minute more than you gave Ron Paul! Your show is garbage. Ron Paul 08' Freedom Not a minute more than you gave Ron Paul! Your show is garbage.

Ron Paul 08' Freedom

]]> By: Larry M. http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-615918 Larry M. Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:27:08 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-615918 You have already given him too much coverage. You have already given him too much coverage.

]]> By: Faith-An http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-614754 Faith-An Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:19:27 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-614754 Will Nader be a part of the CNN debate Tues night? I hope so. We need a third candidate to referee. Will Nader be a part of the CNN debate Tues night? I hope so. We need a third candidate to referee.

]]> By: Jerry Eckert http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-614746 Jerry Eckert Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:18:59 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-614746 How much time to Nader? Zero! Running for President is clearly a hobby of his in which he indulges for his own amusement with total and callous disregard for the consequences to the nation. Nader's time came and went as a consumer advocate. As a politician he has only negative consequences to offer. If he is stupid enough to not realize what he did in Florida in 2000, then he is unqualified on the basis of mental incompetence to lead the country. Zero! How much time to Nader? Zero! Running for President is clearly a hobby of his in which he indulges for his own amusement with total and callous disregard for the consequences to the nation. Nader's time came and went as a consumer advocate. As a politician he has only negative consequences to offer. If he is stupid enough to not realize what he did in Florida in 2000, then he is unqualified on the basis of mental incompetence to lead the country. Zero!

]]> By: Amy Jacobson http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-614742 Amy Jacobson Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:18:52 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-614742 All the Democrats (who are afraid of losing votes to him) will say no time, and all the Republicans (who need him to take away indy votes) want to give him plenty of time. Independents, wish there was a more viable independent candidate, but until that happens, an American voice that respects every human in the most basic way should not be silenced. If you don't agree with his message, don't listen to him. If he scares you because he tells it like it is, you shouldn't be in politics. All the Democrats (who are afraid of losing votes to him) will say no time, and all the Republicans (who need him to take away indy votes) want to give him plenty of time. Independents, wish there was a more viable independent candidate, but until that happens, an American voice that respects every human in the most basic way should not be silenced.

If you don't agree with his message, don't listen to him. If he scares you because he tells it like it is, you shouldn't be in politics.

]]> By: Athena http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-614453 Athena Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:59:21 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-614453 As the mainstream media, whether we Americans like that fact or not, you must realize the power you hold over the presidential race. You have marginalized candidates like Ron Paul, Denis Kucinich, and Mike Gravel, condemning them to obscurity when their views may actually have been supported by many voters. While such voters should have been better informed, one must recognize that many trust greatly in media like CNN to thoroughly educate them. Personally, I am appalled at the disregard you have held for Mike Gravel, who is still in the race as a Democratic nominee yet is COMPLETELY ignored in your coverage of the party's campaign. He may have no delegates, but by refusing to mention him as a candidate, you convey false information and also disrespect. You cannot change the detrimental attitude you chose to take with regard to these highly intelligent, yet underfunded and thus ignored candidates. Yet you can make up for it by giving Ralph Nader the air time he deserves. I understand that CNN simply will not give him the same amount of air time as it gives Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, or John McCain. But Nader deserves a report on his viewpoints and his legacy so that voters will not be misled by CNN into supporting the problems that a two party system entails. Perhaps, unlike the forgotten Gravel, he might be included in a debate with the candidates? As the mainstream media, whether we Americans like that fact or not, you must realize the power you hold over the presidential race. You have marginalized candidates like Ron Paul, Denis Kucinich, and Mike Gravel, condemning them to obscurity when their views may actually have been supported by many voters. While such voters should have been better informed, one must recognize that many trust greatly in media like CNN to thoroughly educate them. Personally, I am appalled at the disregard you have held for Mike Gravel, who is still in the race as a Democratic nominee yet is COMPLETELY ignored in your coverage of the party's campaign. He may have no delegates, but by refusing to mention him as a candidate, you convey false information and also disrespect.

You cannot change the detrimental attitude you chose to take with regard to these highly intelligent, yet underfunded and thus ignored candidates. Yet you can make up for it by giving Ralph Nader the air time he deserves. I understand that CNN simply will not give him the same amount of air time as it gives Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, or John McCain. But Nader deserves a report on his viewpoints and his legacy so that voters will not be misled by CNN into supporting the problems that a two party system entails. Perhaps, unlike the forgotten Gravel, he might be included in a debate with the candidates?

]]> By: Independent-Latina-voter, Salt Lake City, UT http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-614449 Independent-Latina-voter, Salt Lake City, UT Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:59:04 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-614449 None, zip, nada........ zero! Nader is an egomaniac, a spoiler! He ruined Gore's chances of being elected. People let's send a clear message to Nader, DO NOT give a single vote. None, zip, nada........ zero! Nader is an egomaniac, a spoiler! He ruined Gore's chances of being elected.

People let's send a clear message to Nader, DO NOT give a single vote.

]]> By: Zach http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-614440 Zach Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:58:37 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-614440 As little as possible, thank you. As little as possible, thank you.

]]> By: Maureen Bruschi http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-614432 Maureen Bruschi Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:58:10 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-614432 In response to your question about how much air time to give Ralph Nader in the course of the upcoming general campaign, I would say certainly no more than was given Dennis Kucininch. Obviously Nader has no chance of winning and likes to hear himself talk . He probably won't even get on the ballots in many states. Quite honestly, if he was on CNN, I would be forced (as difficult as that would be) to switch to another station. He's a "Johnny come lately" and I'm sure will not get out and campaign like Clinton, Obama and McCain. In response to your question about how much air time to give Ralph Nader in the course of the upcoming general campaign, I would say certainly no more than was given Dennis Kucininch. Obviously Nader has no chance of winning and likes to hear himself talk . He probably won't even get on the ballots in many states. Quite honestly, if he was on CNN, I would be forced (as difficult as that would be) to switch to another station. He's a "Johnny come lately" and I'm sure will not get out and campaign like Clinton, Obama and McCain.

]]> By: Jennifer Bugg http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-614428 Jennifer Bugg Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:57:53 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-614428 We're on a national Date with our future significant other, and Mr. Nader is the nerdy guy at the bar who keeps yammering in our ear and inviting us back to his place to see his new boat. Zero time, Wolf. We're not idiots waiting for Mr. Nader to enlighten us and we're well aware (we Americans) that no candidate is a perfect match. Let's take the time to get to know the candidates who might actually lead this country, their values, and their thought-processes. We're on a national Date with our future significant other, and Mr. Nader is the nerdy guy at the bar who keeps yammering in our ear and inviting us back to his place to see his new boat. Zero time, Wolf. We're not idiots waiting for Mr. Nader to enlighten us and we're well aware (we Americans) that no candidate is a perfect match. Let's take the time to get to know the candidates who might actually lead this country, their values, and their thought-processes.

]]> By: Scott in Minnesota http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-614425 Scott in Minnesota Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:57:40 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-614425 Nader looked at his checkbook and decided to make a few bucks, again. Let him on the ballot... legally we have to. But if you let him in the debates Wolf, well... I'm a little low on money too, so... I'd like to announce my candidacy for President of the United States! Make room on the debate stage for me Wolf, I'll be filing my paperwork shortly... Nader looked at his checkbook and decided to make a few bucks, again.

Let him on the ballot... legally we have to.

But if you let him in the debates Wolf, well... I'm a little low on money too, so...

I'd like to announce my candidacy for President of the United States!

Make room on the debate stage for me Wolf, I'll be filing my paperwork shortly...

]]> By: Frank Aabye http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-614421 Frank Aabye Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:57:30 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-614421 Give Nader what he desreves zip zero coverage, he is old hat no cattle, his run is laughable if not ridiculas Give Nader what he desreves zip zero coverage, he is old hat
no cattle, his run is laughable if not ridiculas

]]> By: Steve Harris http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-614420 Steve Harris Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:57:23 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-614420 Perhaps it's long since time that everyone, even third party candidates who register only marginally in opinion polls should be included as fully as the two major parties' candidates. They sure don't get a fair shake thanks to biased election laws, it'd be nice if the media didn't decide for us which candidates are "viable". Our democratic-republic could use more than two strands of its vast political tapestry represented in the media. If Nader has enough support to make it on ballots throughout the country, he deserves equal time. Perhaps it's long since time that everyone, even third party candidates who register only marginally in opinion polls should be included as fully as the two major parties' candidates. They sure don't get a fair shake thanks to biased election laws, it'd be nice if the media didn't decide for us which candidates are "viable". Our democratic-republic could use more than two strands of its vast political tapestry represented in the media. If Nader has enough support to make it on ballots throughout the country, he deserves equal time.

]]> By: arthur from Boston http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-614378 arthur from Boston Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:53:32 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-614378 about 3 tenths of a second, about the total number of votes he got in 2004 about 3 tenths of a second, about the total number of votes he got in 2004

]]> By: Ryan http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-614365 Ryan Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:52:28 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-614365 I am glad that CNN's talking heads are finally acknowledging (albeit indirectly) their influence on the election. Wolf, to answer your question, you should "give" Nader as much time as time as you "give" any of the other candidates (the arrogance of this notion is incredible). This will probably come as a complete surprise to you, but its not up to you, Wolf, to decide for America which candidates are worth listening to. You are supposed to report the news, not manipulate it. I am glad that CNN's talking heads are finally acknowledging (albeit indirectly) their influence on the election. Wolf, to answer your question, you should "give" Nader as much time as time as you "give" any of the other candidates (the arrogance of this notion is incredible). This will probably come as a complete surprise to you, but its not up to you, Wolf, to decide for America which candidates are worth listening to. You are supposed to report the news, not manipulate it.

]]> By: gorn by any other name http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-614326 gorn by any other name Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:49:36 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-614326 Don't give him any air time unless and until he is on the ballot in at least 40 states. From that point, give him air time equivalent to his polling numbers plus 5%. If he's polling at 2%, give him coverage at 7%. That gives him a fair chance to increase his position without wining about lack of coverage. If he can't increase his polling accordingly, drop down to his polling level. In the last two months of the campaign, you shouldn't give any coverage at all to a candidate that has not exceeded 10% in the polls (already being generous here) because they can't have any chance of winning or doing anything but playing spoiler. Don't give him any air time unless and until he is on the ballot in at least 40 states. From that point, give him air time equivalent to his polling numbers plus 5%. If he's polling at 2%, give him coverage at 7%. That gives him a fair chance to increase his position without wining about lack of coverage. If he can't increase his polling accordingly, drop down to his polling level. In the last two months of the campaign, you shouldn't give any coverage at all to a candidate that has not exceeded 10% in the polls (already being generous here) because they can't have any chance of winning or doing anything but playing spoiler.

]]> By: MICHAEL BURNETT L.I.N.Y. http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-614325 MICHAEL BURNETT L.I.N.Y. Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:49:31 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-614325 WHAT TIME IS IT? FORGET IT' HIS TIME IS UP!!!!!!!! SEE YOU BYE!!!!!! WHAT TIME IS IT? FORGET IT' HIS TIME IS UP!!!!!!!! SEE YOU BYE!!!!!!

]]> By: Joe Klein http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-614323 Joe Klein Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:49:27 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-614323 he's knowledgeable. What does it matter that he won't win. He's promoting issues. If the democrats want those votes as a boost they can adopt an issue (aren't they supposed to be for consumers anyway)? he's knowledgeable. What does it matter that he won't win. He's promoting issues. If the democrats want those votes as a boost they can adopt an issue (aren't they supposed to be for consumers anyway)?

]]> By: Erwin http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/blitzer-how-much-time-should-nader-get/#comment-614321 Erwin Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:49:15 +0000 http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=5544#comment-614321 I believe you are answering your own question; Nader may not lack interesting opinions and the rules of democracy say let him speak. But the news media, especially the mainstream kind-, do not see much promise in Nader, since he's not the big story. So I don't think you will give him much airtime. The likes of Hannity and O'Reilly will embrace him, for sure (and claim to be "Fair & Ballanced" about it), because they'll do anything to take votes away from the Democrats, which is, of course, what Nader will do, regardless of the small numbers. I believe you are answering your own question; Nader may not lack interesting opinions and the rules of democracy say let him speak. But the news media, especially the mainstream kind-, do not see much promise in Nader, since he's not the big story. So I don't think you will give him much airtime. The likes of Hannity and O'Reilly will embrace him, for sure (and claim to be "Fair & Ballanced" about it), because they'll do anything to take votes away from the Democrats, which is, of course, what Nader will do, regardless of the small numbers.

]]>