February 25, 2008
Posted: 04:00 PM ET

ALT TEXT

McCain said he must convince Americans the U.S. policy in Iraq is succeeding. (Photo Credit: AP)

ROCKY RIVER, Ohio (AP) — John McCain said Monday that to win the White House he must convince a war-weary country that U.S. policy in Iraq is succeeding. If he can't, "then I lose. I lose," the Republican said.

He quickly backed off that remark.

"Let me not put it that stark," the likely GOP nominee told reporters on his campaign bus. "Let me just put it this way: Americans will judge my candidacy first and foremost on how they believe I can lead the country both from our economy and for national security. Obviously, Iraq will play a role in their judgment of my ability to handle national security."

"If I may, I'd like to retract 'I'll lose.' But I don't think there's any doubt that how they judge Iraq will have a direct relation to their judgment of me, my support of the surge," McCain added. "Clearly, I am tied to it to a large degree."

The five-year-old Iraq conflict already is emerging as a fault line in the general election, with the Arizona senator calling for the U.S. military continuing its mission while his Democratic opponents urge quick withdrawal.

While most Republicans continue to back the war, many independents and Democrats don't. That presents a significant challenge for McCain and an opportunity for either Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton.

McCain acknowledged the war will be "a significant factor in how the American people judge my candidacy."

The lead Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, McCain has consistently backed the war although he's long criticized the way it was waged after the Saddam Hussein's fall. He was an original proponent of President Bush's troop-increase strategy, having called for more troops on the ground for several years. Last spring, McCain went all in on the war by embracing it as Bush took heat for boosting troop levels to quell violence.

McCain already has signaled that he plans to make Iraq and national security a major part of his general election campaign. He daily accuses both Obama and Clinton as wanting to "wave the white flag of surrender." Democrats, for their part, are arguing that McCain's candidacy is simply a continuation of Bush's "failed" policies. They have seized on a McCain remark in which he suggested that U.S. troop presence — at some level — could extend 100 years or more.

While McCain attracts voters across the political spectrum, he is sure to face resistance this fall for his Iraq position in swing states like Ohio, which has seen high numbers of residents die in Iraq.

Over the next eight months, McCain said he would take the same approach when discussing Iraq that he's taken all year as he won primary after primary on his way to securing the GOP nomination.

He said he would "tell them that I understand their frustration and their sorrow over the sacrifice that has been made and then I try to explain to them what's at stake and what's going on there now. And that's the best I can do."

McCain said his candidacy will be successful "if I can convince the American people, the people of Ohio, that this is succeeding, that the casualties will continue down, although there are occasional spikes."

"So I have to, and I believe can, make an argument that the surge is succeeding, that we will end this war and have the Iraqis take over those responsibilities as we more and more assume support roles and then withdraw," he added.

McCain referenced a USA Today poll that showed most people believe the troop-increase strategy is succeeding. "Now, still the majority of Americans want out of Iraq. And, I understand that, too. So do I," McCain said.

Asked why he asked to retract the "I lose" remark, McCain said much else could happen before the general election that could impact his chances.

"There could be other things that happen both domestically and politically," he said, adding that the economy and subprime mortgages weren't the issues three months ago that they are today.

"We've got many months to go before the general election. But is Iraq an important part of the judgment that people will make of me, of course."

Filed under: AP • Iraq • John McCain


TheLeftNut   February 25th, 2008 9:35 pm ET

Praetorian,

You are such a victim of conservative spin! Let me spin it to the Left for you…

Iraq is an American interest—>What's that mean? Only after we invaded?
Oil is an American interest—>So we should invade Venazuala too?
The security of our allies in the middle east and Persian Gulf is an American interest–So our boys and girls should die to protect them? It's not their job to fix thousands of years of conflict?
Keeping America safe from foreign terrorists–by killing them in Iraq and Afghanistan is an American interest? They weren't in Iraq until we invaded it–Afghanistan is slipping away because our troops are too busy in Iraq.

Our armed services personnel understand– No they don't, they are following orders(like you said)–they have no choice and they can't speak out because it's against military law to engage in behavior that jeopardizes moral

Where's Osama Bin Laden? Iraq? NO. Afghanistan? NO. Pakistan?Yes (so should we invade that country too).

United States is where our constition is. Not Iraq, not Afghanistan.

Bring'em Home Now!

Jenny Clarkus   February 25th, 2008 8:59 pm ET

Where are John McCain's supporters? Probably not hanging out here at CNN. This is liberal media, folks. Go elsewhere if you want to find conservatives.

Jose A. Nieves   February 25th, 2008 8:40 pm ET

To all you folks who are saying you'll vote for McCain instead of Obama, your Jim Crow ways are coming to an end! You dislike Hillary and you hate Obama more because of his skin color, what a shame…

Mike   February 25th, 2008 8:30 pm ET

Wow there are a lot of YOUNG sheep prowling the message boards these day's. For all of you 18 year olds out there with a "supposed" purpose. McCain never said we were going to fight this war for another 100 years. He said our military would probably be in Iraq for another 100 years much the same as Cuba (Kennedy) and Korea (eisenhower) and Japan and phillipines and Kuwait (clinton) and Turkey, Spain, France, Germany and the countless hundreds of countries we have had a military presence in a half century or longer. Grow Up. And if your not intelligent enough to figure this out, your not intelligent enough to vote. Yeah CNN I know "your comment is awaiting moderation".

Candace   February 25th, 2008 8:20 pm ET

McCain you won't win. There's no need to worry.

Closely Watching   February 25th, 2008 8:17 pm ET

….ummm, Senator McCain, I think every time you open your mouth to speak you widen the gap between yourself and Senator Obama even more, and the gap isn't in your favor. Wishing Castro dead and pledging to stay in Iraq for 100 years if needed were apparently just warm-ups for the things to come. This is going to be one interesting general election indeed.

V.Green   February 25th, 2008 8:03 pm ET

I wonder why he would be so clumsy to say that? That's just disappointing, if the Republicans aren't even gonna come with their A-game then we might as well vote now.

For the record, i'm definitely NOT a McCain supporter but if he doesn't even have the good judgement to AVOID starting a public discourse about him losing, complete with details as to HOW & WHY he'll lose before he's even secured his party's nomination, well, that's just unecessary self-flagellation to me.

It's ironic that he's simultaneously trying to convince America that HE CAN AVOID making clumsy blunders like THAT when he has 'all de powa in de world…', yeah right, whatever dude.

Man, so that means we're not even gonna get to see how good Obama MIGHT be before he becomes president. I like Obama but not THAT much, he still has to show me more afterall, this whole process is basically an interview.

Well let's see if McCain feels like being a president tomorrow, I get the impression that he's moody. Although, I don't know that a moody, nuclear president is what I want for Christmas.

And all that stuff about being in Iraq for a hundred years, that was so antagonistic both domestically and internationally.

But I'm sympathetic to the Republicans, It sucks that they don't have better options than McCain, he's definitely NOT champion material.

Yep, It'll be a gooood year, I'm sorry, that was mean, but it will be, see that was me being mean again….

Amanda   February 25th, 2008 8:01 pm ET

Before you bash the 100 year remark, have you considered that we still hold a significant military presence in both Germany and Japan, both of which were demilitarized after WWII? If we stay in stable countries with no means of waging warfare for decades, we certainly need to remain in a country that 1) is hostile towards America, 2) has its own military, and 3) had that military trained by Americans.

Also, regarding the "America, love it or leave it" remark, what else is there? Honestly, where are your varying degrees of patriotism? Are you proud of your country or not? No one and no place ever has been nor ever will be perfect, but at least America is resilient enough to survive a bad presidency. Be proud of the country you believe in. If you are not happy with the state of your country and not willing to try to fix it, you should legitimately shut up or get out.

Papagano   February 25th, 2008 7:54 pm ET

His remark is evidence of lack of experience. Experience can't get into a closed mind, afterall.

Steve, Cedar Rapids, Iowa   February 25th, 2008 7:49 pm ET

Senator Obama said it himself." If you like the policies of George W.Bush then vote for Senator McCain". Think about it people, we elect Senator McCain we will have basically 12 years of the Bush policies and no one to blame but ourselves. Senator McCain seems almost eager to debate Senator Obama on the issues and the war. I say be careful what you wish for, you may get it. Remember he said that we could be in IraQ for up to 100 years. That won't fly with many citzens.

nick nemeth   February 25th, 2008 7:48 pm ET

he is right. we need to stay in iraq to succeed. american lives may be lost and that is terrible, but we are saving the lives of the iraqi people who depend on us to survive.

Bob   February 25th, 2008 7:45 pm ET

McCain, you could lose over a lot more issues. Why don't you ask Mitt Romney to get back in the race in your place and save our party.

You are not fit to be president.

el Roberto   February 25th, 2008 7:41 pm ET

It still amazes me that back in December this "supposed" GOP "nominee" was getting 5% in all the "polls". Now he is the "runaway" leader? Over 90% of these comments are negative about McCain. So where is his support? They control minds with media bias. The establishment was so afraid of losing their "control" over the populous, they did and are still doing everything in their power to ignore Ron Paul. Just compare the fund raising and remember McCain was in the negative up until about a month ago when he "supposedly" makes a great comeback. With the support of whom? I hardly see any Pro-McCain adds on youtube or myspace. No big crowds of followers. Ron Paul just had a rally at the University of Texas that drew a crowd of 4000! So who is supporting this guy???

I smell rigged elections.

Jack from California   February 25th, 2008 7:39 pm ET

John McCain still wants to "win" in Iraq - WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? Does John McCain think a 100 year presence will make the Iraq people love us? After the capture of WMD's and the removal of a Dictator, whats next?

Just for the record Anton - Perpetuating another Republican lie, Dwight Eisenhower started the Vietnam adventure not JFK.

Jed in Texas   February 25th, 2008 7:32 pm ET

Guess we would still be in Vietnam if McCain had a say in it.

Chris   February 25th, 2008 7:31 pm ET

If McCain thinks that he can convince the American people that the war in Irag is still needed then he not only doesn't understand the will of the people, he is fighting an yphill battle as I believe most americans are ready for our sons, daughters, fathers and mothers to come home and stop fighting an unjust war, it time for the Iraqi people to stand up for themselves, it time to let America recuperate from two wars during this Bush Administration, both of which are failed efforts to get an approval rating.

Kim, Dallas, TX   February 25th, 2008 7:28 pm ET

It needs to be said that not all Obama supporters are 18 year olds. Look at the post polls. He wins in virtually every age bracket. I am a white baby boomer and I voted for Obama. The educated part of the country is voting for Obama as well. We can easily see what he has to offer. I will vote for someone with good judgment over someone who is a warmonger any day of the week. Obama knew the war was a mistake, McCain and HIllary both voted to go to war not only with Iraq, but also with labeling Iran's military as a terrorist group. McCain wants to bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb Iran. I DO NOT want another war happy nutcase in the white house whose next step might be to press the button. McCain has changed so many of his stands, he is the biggest flip flopper around. Hillary will say what you want to hear and cannot maintain a level personality. Obama is our only clear choice.

GO OBAMA!!

mike   February 25th, 2008 7:28 pm ET

well, he is used to be in a war situation. I think he likes to fight. and he must have killed many poor, innocent vietnamese during his service, in name of justice. May be we can argue that he fought for USA, well, that does not mean the war was a just one.

For him, he likely would have no problem to bring us/the country to another war with anyone if he wanted to.

For me, he will not have my vote for that very reason.

b-more   February 25th, 2008 7:19 pm ET

I am so sick of reading Republicans say we are winning. Who cares, we should not have invaded that country. We could have killed Saddam with one bomb in the middle of night. Then let the will of the people prevail.

It was, nor will it ever be worth one U.S. life. We can stay there for one hundred years, which we probably will, however there will never be a day when a U.S. soldier can safely leave the base and stroll the streets without getting killed. They do not want us there, and we don't belong there. Please try to see this from there perspective.

John McCain is a hanger on at best, and he is insane to boot. He is a huge hypocrite and mostly a liar, but today he spoke the truth, before he realized it, and then began to lie again.

Bostonpatriot   February 25th, 2008 7:14 pm ET

MacCain is the only choice if you are talking national security and the economy. Barak is just a little boy without a clue compared to Macain when it comes to these issues. And when independents and moderate democrats get in the the voting booth they will vote with their heads and not their liberal guilt.

Jenny Clarkus   February 25th, 2008 7:14 pm ET

Wake up America. Half of our population still believes in family, the military, and helping other countries move towards democracy. Don't be so sure everyone wants a liberal in office.

Also, only irresponsible people leave a country in dire straights. Responsible people go the distance and do what they have to do to help Iraq stand on its own. You don't just cut and run.

And for all you sensationlistic types, McCain rightly said "I could lose". He didn't say "I WILL LOSE", so grow up and stop twisting words. He's honest at least, and he actually has a platform. Better than OBLABBA.

River   February 25th, 2008 7:14 pm ET

To Dean,

I am not supporting McCain and certainly don't support George W. McCain is another George W. in my opinion.

Go Huckabee!!!

floridian   February 25th, 2008 7:13 pm ET

The Iraq war will not be Sen. McCain's albatross cause once either of the Democrats is chosen they will be put on notice to provide a specific exit strategy and they will FAIL. It is easy to say, at this time, I will pull the troops out and get the votes that come with that ridiculous promise. But when the real campaign comes we will find that the American populace will want specifics and none will be given by the Democratic nominee or if they are given they will be significantly different than what we are hearing now. Can't you all remember how different the promises are during a primary versus a general election campaign? Think in terms of that and not what you are hearing now!

Anita M   February 25th, 2008 7:00 pm ET

So many comments from so many ignoramuses! They can't spell, use incorrect grammar, and then have the gall to make disparaging remarks about a certain candidate. Can anyone truly think that Obama is as qualified or ready to lead this country now as Clinton? Dream on. He may be ready in a few more years but definitely not now. He's a babe in the woods compared to her even though he is a talented speaker albeit laced with unity, hope and change??? The country faces too many problems and Obama's policies that he's lately included in his speeches sound suspiciously similar to Senator Clinton's who has always spoken in depth about all the issues and solutions to the problems. Plagiarism by Obama? You bet! Hasn't anyone caught on yet? Wake up before it's too late!

Darth Vadik, CA   February 25th, 2008 6:58 pm ET

Trollmaster, CA

THAT IS THE BEST COMMENT I HAVE HEARD ALL DAY,
PROPS TO YOU…

kevin from alaska   February 25th, 2008 6:57 pm ET

Correction: you SHOULD lose over Iraq.

Tony   February 25th, 2008 6:54 pm ET

It's funny all the Democrats wants to pull out of Iraq.

I bet you if either Obama or Hillary gets in, NONE OF THEM WILL PULL OUT OF IRAQ. They don' thave the BALLS to do it.

Imagine pulling otu of Iraq and then have Al Qaeda build a base there, then attack the US - Democrats would be FINISHED in that scenario.

They're all saying withdraw, but the bottom line is, none of them will withdraw the troops.

Dan   February 25th, 2008 6:50 pm ET

The only viable anti-war Republican candidate left is Ron Paul. Americans who consider themselves a Republican can vote for someone else other than McCain. Having said that I have to add that Ron Paul has no chance of winning. So who can you vote for if you are a Republican and you do not support the war in Iraq? You can always choose not to vote, your vote does not matter anyway. The elections are fixed, the house always wins in the end (this statement only makes sense to people who gamble but it is true).

Donald, Butte, MT   February 25th, 2008 6:50 pm ET

IRAQI, IRAQI, IRAQI!!!

Enough is enough!!!

Like this country doesn't have other more pressing problems facing it other than this self-imposed mess.

John McCain wake up and smell the roses. Americans are tired of this fiasco and the constant lies and manipulations coming from our party.

Its time to face reality and MOVE ON!!!! Didn't you get the message in 2006. Americans are tired of this crap!!!

Cydonia   February 25th, 2008 6:49 pm ET

It still amazes me that back in December this "supposed" GOP "nominee" was getting 5% in all the "polls". Now he is the "runaway" leader? Over 90% of these comments are negative about McCain. So where is his support? They control minds with media bias. The establishment was so afraid of losing their "control" over the populous, they did and are still doing everything in their power to ignore Ron Paul. Just compare the fund raising and remember McCain was in the negative up until about a month ago when he "supposedly" makes a great comeback. With the support of whom? I hardly see any Pro-McCain adds on youtube or myspace. No big crowds of followers. Ron Paul just had a rally at the University of Texas that drew a crowd of 4000! So who is supporting this guy???

I smell rigged elections.

buffalo   February 25th, 2008 6:47 pm ET

I couldn't agree with you more Prohet MCcain.

Glenn   February 25th, 2008 6:47 pm ET

"Iraq is an American interest.
Oil is an American interest…" - Praetorian.

You nailed it right on the head. Good ol' fashion texas tea is our (financial) interest, for this president and the rest of his oil tycoons that is. Oh yeah, and something about Iraq and democracy is somewhere there too.

Give it up. It's people like you who blindly adhere to military policy because you always think that our government is always benevolent and right. This is perfect example of inverse ad hominem fallacy. This administration is a complete and utter failure and the whole world knows it, it's just obstinate people like yourself who can't fathom living without someone telling you to follow orders.

Brian   February 25th, 2008 6:45 pm ET

Fair enough. You lose.

Kim   February 25th, 2008 6:44 pm ET

Maybe if she ever said anything positive, then the media would have something positive to report about her. Instead of her constant sarcasim. Months ago I was torn because I believed they were both stellar candidates. But, her refusal to express any regret over her decision to vote for the war, only reminded me of G.W.B. And her initial response, "If you're looking for a candidate to apologize for the war, there are others you can vote for" (paraphased). How arrogant!!! I could not stand the thought of another stubborn, bullheaded President leading our country. Male or Female..There is a significant difference between strength and stubborness.

Rationale   February 25th, 2008 6:42 pm ET

Than you so much Mr McCain, finally I can breathe!!!!!!!!

K. Street,Washington   February 25th, 2008 6:39 pm ET

Yes John,that and the fact you would Pardon all the treasonous criminals that will come to light soon.

Valerie   February 25th, 2008 6:39 pm ET

He took the words right out of my mouth. YES — Senator — you are an honorable man, but you will lose. To Obama.

becca   February 25th, 2008 6:34 pm ET

right now, clinton is the only one who knows exactly how she's going to get all of the troops out and obama will have to ask someone else how to do it. i cannot vote for obama, so please mr. mccain, admit defeat and get us out of there. staying in a losing war IS defeat. at least he's honest and more moderate than the other right-wing nutbags.

btw, in case you people didn't know, john mccain's son in serving in iraq. he just doesn' talk about it.

Avis C, Richton Park,IL   February 25th, 2008 6:32 pm ET

DUH! Among other things, like your "connections to Lobbyist"!

LaLa in KCMO   February 25th, 2008 6:31 pm ET

We spend more in one week in Iraq than we do on Cancer research.

Yeah, you're gonna have to convince us BIG TIME.

k. lee   February 25th, 2008 6:31 pm ET

He finally see's the light!!!!

Tou   February 25th, 2008 6:27 pm ET

Let's all be honest now and propose a new bill. Anyone running to be President of the United States should be prevented from running if they are mentally unable to. The man may have been a good senator in the past, but it's obvious his mental state is degrading. Now I'm totally against age discrimination or anything like that but it's clear, he has become incapable of leading because of natural causes which has handicapped his judgment. I really think that when they asked him if we'll be in Iraq for 50 years, he really thought they were asking him how old he was. " 100 Years! "

Ray - NJ   February 25th, 2008 6:27 pm ET

you have my vote if Obama gets the nomination!!

Texas4Obama   February 25th, 2008 6:25 pm ET

Ya think McCain?

Wow, you're almost as brilliant as Bush!

A note to those who said they'll vote for McCain if their choice for democratic nominee doesn't get the nomination…

Seriously? All that does is give us another term with a republican in the White House, and if that is the last thing our country needs. Don't vote out of spite, it will get us nowhere. She said it herself, their position on policy is almost the same. There are a few differences, and I for one could live with Hillary if she won, but I could never bring myself to vote for McCain. If you do, you'll have no one to blame but yourself. Please vote with your head, and don't get sucked into all of this mud slinging, it's unseemly!

Obama '08
YES WE CAN!

Patty Atlanta GA   February 25th, 2008 6:24 pm ET

THIS MAN IS AN ADULTERER - CASE CLOSED!

tc   February 25th, 2008 6:23 pm ET

At least McCain knows the truth!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Tim, Boston MA   February 25th, 2008 6:22 pm ET

according to your own poll, CNN,

the number one thing people want our govt to do for a better economy and a better life here is

TO PULL OUT OF OTHER SOVEREIGN COUNTRIES THAT WE'VE BEEN OCCUPYING!

which part of that demand don't you elites understand?

becca   February 25th, 2008 6:20 pm ET

i like john mccain but this war can never be won. we could be there for 100 years and we would still lose. that's why we have to just get out now. they don't want us there - let them deal with their own problems.

Farrell, Houston, Tx   February 25th, 2008 6:19 pm ET

John McCain doesn't recognize that Americans now have a voice, so don't try that Bushy stuff on us.

Dean   February 25th, 2008 6:19 pm ET

The (ultra-right wing conservatives) Republicans that continue to attack McCain are the same 30% of the population that still believe that George W is doing a good job. Open your eyes and minds, people!

John Austin   February 25th, 2008 6:19 pm ET

The bush administration is responsible for getting America into Iraq with all the lies that they fabricated. I do not think that Americans need to honor these lies anymore. This in no way takes away from the bravery our soldiers have displayed. Americans are extremely proud of them, and rightfully so; however, America does not need to honor the lies that brought us to Iraq. McCain will continue to honor all those lies. Obama will bring our soldiers home.

Anonymous   February 25th, 2008 6:18 pm ET

The bush administration is responsible for getting America into Iraq with all the lies that they fabricated. I do not think that Americans need to honor these lies anymore. This in no way takes away from the bravery our soldiers have displayed. Americans are extremely proud of them, and rightfully so; however, America does not need to honor the lies that brought us to Iraq. McCain will continue to honor all those lies. Obama will bring our soldiers home.

Richard Seagraves   February 25th, 2008 6:15 pm ET

Are there any more venomous people on the planet than Americans on boards such as these who don't like Republicans? For a party that preaches about change, inclusion, hope, and judgment, the voters for that party are a distinct contrast to those ideas.

I have truly never seen more immaturity and recklessness on behalf of a political party than some of the positions you people take. I am actually sick to be a part of a democracy that incorporates so much hatred towards people who believe differently than you. The attitude many on this board perpetuate is the reason the world is chaotic, unpredictable, violent, and disheartening. Your attitudes leave no hope to those affected by your policies and words.

As one fine American once said, however, "hypocrisy is the greatest luxury Americans possess".

Dean   February 25th, 2008 6:14 pm ET

Let me correct my prior post, "there's little doubt in my mind that we will NOT remain in Iraq in large numbers beyond 2012…"

I recognize that this is (at least) 4 years longer then most of us would like to be there.

Mark   February 25th, 2008 6:14 pm ET

If the Clintons run Americas Health System like they ran their campaign, we will all be in critical condition.

ari   February 25th, 2008 6:14 pm ET

He makes too many slips of the tongue and it is even not funny. Don't know much about the economy,(remind me of a song) confused how to sell continuing Iraq presence (100 years); I will loose, no I won't; its almost sad to watch, how he has to sell the conservative agenda which he don't wholeheartedly belief in. He was a kind of maverick with his own agenda, now relinguished to play the part in the political machine. Maybe they can stop the drama, plant a microphone and read his lines. Playing the fool doesn't suit him, and think the confusion is related to what he has to say and actually belefs, which makes anybody confused. Reagan was sometimes comical with his ignorance this is more like a drama.

katie   February 25th, 2008 6:12 pm ET

I shudder just at the thought of McCain winning the presidency. America's credibility round the world, or whatever left of it, would be totally shot. A president who wants our military to be in Iraq for a hundred years? We've been in Korea for only 50 years and we have definitely outlasted our welcome.

Faith-An   February 25th, 2008 6:11 pm ET

DIStortion of the facts…You people ought to be ashamed. McCain said that IF necessary he would leave troops in Iraq for 50 years or even 100 years. That as long as they were there to keep the peace and no one is getting killed it would be okay. That we have troops in Germany and other countries that have been there for years.. I am not a McCain supporter but distorting the facts to make your un-informed comments are not even civilized. I don't know if you folks are being mean or just ignorant.

rlkidd   February 25th, 2008 6:06 pm ET

McCain doesn't have to worry about losing the election because of Iraq.
He lost over immigration

Horace P Manure   February 25th, 2008 6:05 pm ET

CORRECTION:

You will lose because your nomination is the second time the Republicans have thrown you under the bus.

And you're a tired old white guy with nothing to offer but more of the same crap we've suffered with for seven years.

Mike Birmingham, AL   February 25th, 2008 6:02 pm ET

To McCain and the rest, victory in Iraq is defined as staying there.

We are only creating more terrorists and more anti-American sentiment every day we continue to occupy Iraq.

This makes our country safer how?

McCain deserves to lose on this issue because he's wrong about it.

Darth Vadik, CA   February 25th, 2008 5:59 pm ET

JayR,

If Obama can not only withstand the Clinton machine, he will trounce the Republican machine.

Although I would like to thank senator Kerry for choosing Obama to give the keynote speech at the Democratic Convention.

That was a new beginning for the Democras, we had a feeling, but we weren't sure just yet….

…NOW WE KNOW.

Trollmaster, CA   February 25th, 2008 5:58 pm ET

Mission Accomplished

We've turned a corner

Stay the Course

The surge is working.

The only Repubilcan plan for Iraq is to keep changing worthless bumpersticker slogans.

McCain WILL lose the election. Americans see the invasion of Iraq has caused far more problems than it solved. We don't want to see the US econmony permanently bankrupt and ruined by borrowing more money on this failed crusade.

Yeah Right   February 25th, 2008 5:57 pm ET

"If I may, I'd like to retract 'I'll lose."

If we may, we'd like to retract the war.

T-Train   February 25th, 2008 5:57 pm ET

I can't wait until the general election, when Obama finally has to go into more detail than saying, "We're going to change this country."

His huge following of 18 year olds buy into it, but it won't be long before everyone realizes that he doesn't have any real ideas or relevant experience.

I think everyone agrees that the war needs to end. The worst way for us to let it end is to give the Presidency to Obama so he can surrender.

I just hope our next President isn't elected because he's good at giving speeches. I'm confident that people will come to their senses before November.

Bill   February 25th, 2008 5:57 pm ET

McCain will be a good and honest president who will reach out to the best that America has to offer, for example Petraeous and company and a vast number of others who can contribute exceptional talent and maturity. He will be a President whom we can trust to do the right thing, using American competence and counsel, the best in the world.

ROB   February 25th, 2008 5:57 pm ET

IT'S PEOPLE LIKE McCAIN THAT PROTECT UNPATRIOTIC PEOPLE
LIKE MOST OF YOU. IF LOVING OUR COUNTRY AND SACRIFICING
SELF FOR COUNTRY JOHN McCAIN IS A TRUE PATRIOT. THIS TYPE PERSON WILL MAKE DECISIONS ON WHAT THEY FEEL IS BEST FOR OUR COUNTRY. THEY WILL NOT CHANGE TO THE TUNE OF
WHAT THE MEDIA PLAYS UP.

Jose A. Nieves   February 25th, 2008 5:55 pm ET

I smell a landslide…

Jeff from Jersey   February 25th, 2008 5:55 pm ET

Dear Brendan from PA.

I don't recall 90% of the people in this country ever voting for ANYTHING by that margin and most certainly NOT for the biggest blunder in american history.I also know that the President and his other rats lied about everything connected with this shameful war.You are worried about "gang land" america you need look no further than the whitehouse!Bush not only knew about the mis-information,he encouraged it!
He wanted to go to war in Iraq from the instant he even THOUGHT about running for president!He was so hot to go there that he dropped Bin Laden from the #1 priority just so he could go to Iraq!For McCain to keep us there as long as he wants your great-grandchildren will be fighting in Iraq!The ONLY way to save american lives is for the US to pull out of Iraq immediately and let the UN and the reat of the world that we are so busy "saving" get off of their butts and take over.It's our mistake and it's about time we admitted it and let someone else do some of the heavy lifting for a change!Will we "lose face"?No more than we already have and every day we delay bringing our troops home guarantees the certain loss of more american lives to NO GOOD PURPOSE BUT PRIDE!

John H.   February 25th, 2008 5:54 pm ET

War Sucks, I just want it to end. Then show me how to get gas back to at least 1.50. and fix the darn economy. Put price gougers in jail and you know who you are.

Independent-Latina-voter, Salt Lake City, UT   February 25th, 2008 5:54 pm ET

Yes, Iraq WILL cost the Republicans this election. Bush blew it.

Bob   February 25th, 2008 5:54 pm ET

I think the only way he could possibly win is to just go ahead, admit that there's really only one party, and ask Hillary to be his VP.

Tim B, KS   February 25th, 2008 5:54 pm ET

Even though I'm going to vote Democrat this year (barring Hillary actually winning, in which case it'll probably be Nader), this is the one thing that I really respect about McCain–his candidness. He will say what he believes, and not really say what you want to hear. Sure, he has some spin, but to a much lesser degree than other politicians have. I am not affiliated with any party, but I do disagree with a lot of McCain's views, so that is why I wouldn't vote for him.

I wouldn't vote for Hillary because she fails rule #1 in the book "How to Win Friends and Influence People", and that is that you have to understand the perspective of others before you can make the best decision for everyone. I think that she thinks that the only other perspective in the world is that of her campaign strategists, and I'm sorry to say that that is very wrong.

The reason why her only two memorable moments in her campaign had to do with her being conscious that other people exist in this country–when she cried that she has to comb her hair on some days, and that she cried that her having to comb her hair is not as bad as other people have it.

It's few and far between when Hillary is cognizant of U.S. Citizens, and when she finally acknowledges them, she is praised. Unfortunately for her, that is her ultimate downfall in this Democratic election–her negligence for the average American.

William E. Sabin   February 25th, 2008 5:54 pm ET

McCain will be a good and honest president who will reach out to the best that America has to offer, for example Petraeous and company and a vast number of others who can contribute exceptional talent and maturity. He will be a President whom we can trust to do the right thing, using American competence and counsel, the best in the world.

Hal   February 25th, 2008 5:48 pm ET

McCainiacs need to wake up this guy is all over the map. He has changed his stance on EVERY issue.

1. The Religious Right has too much influence in our party (2000). Jerry Falwell is my best pal (2007)
2. A tax cut is bad for the economy especially wlhen we are proparing for war( 2004). No new taxes (2008)
3. We need comprehensive immigration reform (2006) . We need to deport all them Messicans (2008)
4. Torture is a crime and the U.S. should not be using the same tactics as the terrorists and N. Vietnam (2006-7). We should not have our military torturing people because they are not trained to do it but it's okay for the CIA to do it (2008).
5. Lobbyists are bad for the political process (2000-8). But it's okay for me to have them run and finance my campaign (2008).

McCain a man of integrity??? Who will say anything to get elected.

The GOP has lost it's mind and my vote.

lekano   February 25th, 2008 5:48 pm ET

You had better have a good answer for your Iraq statement. Else you going down.

JzB   February 25th, 2008 5:45 pm ET

As a president Macain may bring sense of confidence when it comes to defence and security, but in the mean time a country that is economically weak within may not bring lasting stability and security.

Honey   February 25th, 2008 5:40 pm ET

No John, you're more likely to lose because you're too much like the clown we have in office now. America wants change. They want Barack Obama in the White House, not some clueless old goat.

John   February 25th, 2008 5:38 pm ET

Americas first steps into the 21st century reeks of decomposition under this republican zoo aka Bush/Cheney freak show.
McCain would do himself a favor to pause before he touts this administration with accalades it doesn't deserve over a failed Iraq war that spends $177 million each and every day. Republicans should remember that some Americans can read, and we've seen the Intel used by this administration that perpetuates the "ugly American" term heard all around the world. Except now they mean it.

Praetorian, Ft Myers, FL   February 25th, 2008 5:38 pm ET

Our troops all take an oath to support, uphold the constitution of the United States, to protect and defend the President, and to follow the orders of their superiors in defense of American interests. They have pledged to lay down their lives if necessary in protection of those interests.

Iraq is an American interest.
Oil is an American interest.
The security of our allies in the middle east and Persian Gulf is an American interest.
Keeping America safe from foreign terrorists–by killing them in Iraq and Afghanistan is an American interest.

Our armed services personnel understand–do we?

Arthur   February 25th, 2008 5:34 pm ET

Mcain is right on the mark. He will lose as he backs up Iraq war. We as a great super power. If we can not win the war in a few months, we have been defeated by our enermy.
We have showed the world that we are a loser. It is time to bring someone (who against war) to lead country.

SAM   February 25th, 2008 5:32 pm ET

No dumb wars! we are not going to be dying at the whimp of any war monger… I'll salute your service and vote against your dumb wars anyday. The art of war is like a game of chess to you i notice, win, win, win… in the course of the ups and downs in your war games, people die sir! it could be me or the relative of my reader. We Want Change!

Gary of El Centro, Ca   February 25th, 2008 5:25 pm ET

Having been so intimately involved in the Viet Nam mess, John "My Friend" McCain should have been the first to realize the sooner we back out of this thing the better. To say that pulling out will cause bad things to happen and we must therefore stay, is to ignore the reality that bad things will happen whether we leave now or 100 years from now. Bad things did happen when we left Viet Nam. Is he saying we should have remained in Viet Nam to prevent those bad things from happening? He reminds me of a gambling addict at the craps table, throwing good money after bad and thinking if he just stcks with it long enough, something good will happen.

Colo   February 25th, 2008 5:24 pm ET

We need to end this WAR and fix this country………DEMs all the way..McCain is over baby!!!!

Michael   February 25th, 2008 5:19 pm ET

As much as I dislike Hillary Clinton, I'd even vote for her over this guy. I think he may still be shell shocked, but even a broken clock is right two times a day…and he is right on with this statement.

I do have to add, you should not have said that you may lose, you will lose, my friend!

TheLeftNut   February 25th, 2008 5:19 pm ET

Gary wrote: "stay there until the job is done and the country is able to look after itself"

I'm sure our troops didn't sign up to protect the Iraqi constitution or to be baby sitters.

Wake up, Gary!

John J.   February 25th, 2008 5:18 pm ET

I rather have Mcain as a president than a crying president (Hillary).

Paula   February 25th, 2008 5:18 pm ET

I was not in favor of this war. I felt that we should have done something about Saddam Hussein long before we did however, I felt it was wrong that 9/11 was used as a platform and justification for invading Iraq and hunting him down. That being said, we are there now and have been working hard to help and make changes. I wish we never sent our troops over and I wish we could yank them right back out of there but we simple cannot just pack up and leave now. Those boys fought hard over there to make a difference, some gave their lives for it. I think it would be a slap in their face not to see it through to the end and have a plan for bringing them home. If my choice comes down to Obama and McCain it'll be a tough decision and this is one of the issues that I side with McCain on though I believe we have to have a real plan in place to finish this up and eventually bring our boys home.

Mike NYC, NY   February 25th, 2008 5:18 pm ET

100 years, 100 years, 100 years. You pretty much lost the second you uttered that ridiculous notion…

Tim T.   February 25th, 2008 5:17 pm ET

Remember 'Nam? "Knee deep in the big muddy, and the ol' fool says
push on." Fast-track to 2008 and you have the same ol' story with a new set of words.

PDC   February 25th, 2008 5:16 pm ET

Sorry guys. I can't bring myself to be afraid anymore. I'm just not going to live in fear, and mindlessly pull the lever for the GOP because their warmongers is the only thing keeping me safe.

Thanks but no thanks. Live in fear if you want, but I'm done with it.

Wiselectorate   February 25th, 2008 5:15 pm ET

The earlier you come to terms with the electorates the better. The days of Texas, arrogant, bunker mentality diplomacy is over.

slapstick, FLORIDA   February 25th, 2008 5:15 pm ET

Ohh what reality show was he watching. It finally hit ole boy that his mouth has cashed a check that his tush can't cash. Maybe Nader can run Republican; they are funding him right? LOL what a joke Nadar.

Bob Mullins - Logan Utah   February 25th, 2008 5:14 pm ET

Dear Mr. McCain.
Although I was willing to pu
t Romney in the Whtie House, I knew he could not make it for who he is.

Again, I tell you, you will not make it into the White House for, who you are.

Obama will beat Clinton, and he will be the next President of the United States.

As far as those who say you have integrity. I say you don't. You claim to be a Vet ot the Hanoy Hilton, I say, so what.

Let me tell you "like it is", or things as "they really are".

Obama will win this Fall. He will be President next year, and many will cry and complain about his politics and his answers. Nevertheless, he will be there. America deserves what America votes in, or I mean "manipulates the vote to get in".

O'Grimacy   February 25th, 2008 5:13 pm ET

There aren't even conditions for victory laid out anywhere.

We'll just stay until we win isn't a condition for victory. That's called a permanent garrison.

Oliver   February 25th, 2008 5:12 pm ET

Americans will choose the most accomplished, seasoned and experienced leader. And we all know who that is.

WestCoastMessenger   February 25th, 2008 5:12 pm ET

Three cheers for John McCain if he loses over Iraq. $9 trillion cheers for the American public if McCain does not prevail.

Praetorian, Ft Myers, FL   February 25th, 2008 5:11 pm ET

To Brendan in Philly!!

What a pleasure to see reason, logic, and respect for American traditions and values in your comments. So many adults in our country are driven by feel good answers to complex and painful questions.

I do hope you are college bound! Our nations future is dependent on more clear headed young people like yourself with their feet in reality–and the desire to serve the nation. Keep your own mind–and never forget liberty, freedom, and democracy are worth fighting for. Our proud armed forces serving around the world certainly will not. I won't. And I can surely tell you that John McCain won't.

CLP   February 25th, 2008 5:10 pm ET

Mr. McCain… ya think! Hello 3/4 of the country is beyond wanting an end to the "Conflict in Iraq". Honestly you can't call it a "war" when there isn't another army or any combat troops to fight and you can't call it a "war" when we're "managing" someone else's civil war and are exposed to the repercussion of a people who feel they are defending their land against a foreign occupier.

Anton   February 25th, 2008 5:10 pm ET

At least McCain is being honest…remember Obama is being compared to Kennedy…and look what Kennedy did with Viet Nam, and Lyndon Johnson, another liberal democrat after JFK, only escalated our involvement in Viet Nam. I wouldn't be surprised at all if Obama escalated the "so-called" conflict in the Middle East…and all I can say is that I'm happy that I'm not of draft age anymore:)

Christian, Tampa FL   February 25th, 2008 5:10 pm ET

Well, it's good that McCain wasn't in denial for a moment. He will lose not only over Iraq, but also because he supports failed economic measures and an obsolete approach to foreign policy.

To elect McCain, as nice of a person as he may be, would be disaster right now. We need a leader who can build bridges with countries all over the world, and Obama can do that much better than either Clinton or McCain.

Ryanne Ball   February 25th, 2008 5:09 pm ET

The facts are that the major things the majority of Americans are worried about are
A. healthcare
B. the war in Iraq
C. the economy

Well, we know from what McCain has said in previous debates/ speeches that he doesn't support universal healthcare, he is more than willing to continue the war in Iraq for "100 years", and that he doesn't know much about the economy. If this man is elected it will be a sad sad day for Americans, and I will hang my head in shame.

Jason   February 25th, 2008 5:07 pm ET

To the poeple calling John McCain a "loser". First off, this man is a war vet that fought and practically gave his life for this country. After returning home he has spent the remainder of his life working to improve it through politics. He has gained the respect of both his constituents and his peers and has risen all the way to being the presumed nominee for the President of the United States! A loser?? You are the loser my ignorant friend. I challenge you to accomplish a fraction of what he has in your lifetime.

If you don't agree with the man, fine, that's more than fair and your right. But don't go around bashing him from your little computer chair.

And as far as the "100 years" comment of his, yes that sounds bad… but we still have forces in Vietnam, Korea, and even Germany! That's 50+ years and we won't be leaving any time soon. It's a realistic estimate of how long "some" U.S. presence will be required.

Michael Obama   February 25th, 2008 5:06 pm ET

Of Course Iraq is going to make him lose. 60% of the united states thinks it is a mistake and won't vote for him because of that.

Harsh Reality   February 25th, 2008 5:06 pm ET

At least McCain is brutally honest about what he thinks, especially compared to Bush. I don't agree that McCain should be our next President, but I do applaud his honesty.

robert williams   February 25th, 2008 5:06 pm ET

Bring all the troops home now! Stop squandering lives and money on a futile attempt at quixotic nation building for people who largely hold our values and way of life in contempt. Let the Iraqis know it's over. Set a date and end it.

Jackie   February 25th, 2008 5:05 pm ET

Duhhh…you are a quick one, McCain. Have fun debating!!! You will lose.

Victor Canas   February 25th, 2008 5:05 pm ET

We are in Iraq . Agree or not…doesn't matter.
The future President of the United States must deal with it and nobody is better than John McCain to get the job done. Also, he's able to make decisions even when they're not popular.
The situation in Iraq is better now than it was a year ago…John was right and unpopular when he had the courage to do the right thing.
John McCain is also the person to bring a humane solution to the immigration issue, once resolved even the economy will improve.

Bing, St. Louis, MO   February 25th, 2008 5:03 pm ET

Let the Dems and Ralph flog each other. Don't shoot yourself in the foot John.

Will   February 25th, 2008 5:03 pm ET

Indeed, since our objective and incisive media is too deeply infatuated with Senator McCain to accurately report on the "campaign finance reformer's" hypocritical career-long relationships with Washington lobbyists, Iraq is probably the only thing that McCain can fairly be judged on. God knows, if you swooning media nitwits had your way, you'd make Iraq seem all rainbows and ponies so that your favorite candidate could have a clear path to the White House.

Gary   February 25th, 2008 5:02 pm ET

At least he's honest about it.n I'm sure he know's when need to stay there until the job is done and the country is able to look after itself, unlike the Dems (and the american people) who don't see the big picture and just want the troops home.

..whiners

J   February 25th, 2008 5:01 pm ET

If my options are Hillary Clinton, or Barrack Obama, it's pretty clear we are going to be a lot safer with John McCain than either of the other two. If the truth be known, it isn't John's development of this mess in Iraq, this has been in the works by others that are now not willing to support him. Ask yourself why. He wants out of Iraq more than any of you know, but he is NOT going to leave our flanks unguarded. Ask him about his plans for the country, the drought, the energy problems, our needs for green living, our carbon footprint, the problems that created the horrible fires these past summers. Ask John specifics, you'll get answers, ask Hillary or Barrack, you'll get spin.

Paul Abeln, Bloomington, Minnesota   February 25th, 2008 5:01 pm ET

In simple terms the November election will be a referendum on the Iraq war. Want another four years of a similar tack? Fine, vote McCain. Want us to do a graceful exit from Iraq, vote differently. The US voting public is not as nuanced as the contributors to this blog. The Iraq conflict will be the topical issue. Plus, I see a large number of young voters expressing their response to Iraq. McCain has certain good qualities. But his support for this dumb war will doom his chances in November.

OC   February 25th, 2008 5:01 pm ET

"As Senator McCain has said on a number of occasions, it isn’t troop presence that the American people object to – it’s the loss of American lives.” -

What americans object to is the 11 billion dollars per month spent on a war that does not battle al Qaeda or terrorism and does not make us any more safe….. The 11 billion per month should be spent
on education, infrastructure and goodwill in the US and abroad. After 100 years maybe war will be viewed as an outdated and antiquated form of dispute resolution…..That should be the goal and the change in mindset we are looking for. For those of you who view this as idealism - consider instead that it is idealistic to believe that the planet can survive another 100 years of war and divisiveness.

Beverly   February 25th, 2008 4:59 pm ET

McCain would have alot of Democrat votes if he was not such a strong supporter of the war. The American people respect him.
The war will cost him .

Cable King Pittsburgh PA   February 25th, 2008 4:59 pm ET

and McKain should be President because . . . . . . . . . . . .

pia   February 25th, 2008 4:56 pm ET

I protested against this war before it started and it has to end yesterday

I will never vote for you because of your stand on the war - Pia

TheLeftNut   February 25th, 2008 4:55 pm ET

YES! We need to stay in Iraq so we can catch Osama Bin Laden!

Wait a minute…

Pat   February 25th, 2008 4:55 pm ET

His position on the war makes him a loser. His comments regarding future relations with Cuba. Was I the only one who heard him say that Cubans were some of the ones who tortured him and his comrades in the POW camp, and that we should continue to have nothing to do with Cuba?

Don   February 25th, 2008 4:55 pm ET

I vote McCain who represents strength, integrity and proven leadership . . . other then McCain, we all lose.

marie   February 25th, 2008 4:55 pm ET

I have a question for everyone on this site - I was a small child during the Vietnam war - but I have vivid memories of seeing footage of the war on television. I know there are volumes of photographs documenting the horror of what happened there.

Don't you all think its disturbing that GW Bush hasn't allowed any of the war in Irag to be covered in this way? I remember several years back there was a big stir, because there was a photographs of coffins draped in flags being shipped back to the U.S. and from that moment on - nothing else.

I just feel as if we can't make an educated decision about anything - unless we truly know what's happening and TRUTHFULLY, it seems to me if we saw the horrors of it all - we would all be so outraged - we'd be out on the streets in full force. It's like by keeping us uninformed or unaware by not allowing us to see images of the war, we forget - some how.

AaronK   February 25th, 2008 4:55 pm ET

OK, I just want to throw this out there. Let's say that the US policy in Iraq is currently working, even though there is no way to say for sure that it will continue to work indefinitely. Shouldn't we, as Americans, ask the question: Is this what US policy should be? Should we actually be in Iraq? Should we actually have military bases in any country other than our own? America is looking very un-American at this time in our history… makes me sad.

Bill   February 25th, 2008 4:53 pm ET

The American people just aren't used to "straight talk ". Eight years of John McCain should help to solve this problem.

Mike & Ike   February 25th, 2008 4:52 pm ET

fight the real enemy — LIBERALISM! Didn't you just read the front page article on CNN? 80% of the United States population is Christian. Christians want people free. Why? So they can CHOOSE what God they want to worship. FREEDOM! VOTE DEMOCRACY, VOTE MCCAIN!

AJ, IL   February 25th, 2008 4:51 pm ET

McCain you will lose on many fronts, not only Iraq. You will lose on the economy, foreign policy, the environment, and energy. Even campaign finance reform, you will lose on.

Obama in 08!

Evergreen State Guy   February 25th, 2008 4:49 pm ET

It's not just the war that is going to topple McCain in November. He's the wrong GOP candidate period! The liberals planned and executed well their idea of pushing him as the front runner. Liberal news outlets, moderate dems..all endorsed him. The rest of America was fooled, and now the mostly likely-to-be-beat republican candidate is in the November ballot.

Thanks all those who voted for McCain in the primaries. You basically just voted for Obama!

I applaud you libs….well done this round!

AP   February 25th, 2008 4:49 pm ET

Come on, dude. You're gonna lose. The sonner you accept it, the less painful it will be.

J   February 25th, 2008 4:49 pm ET

If my options are Hillary Clinton, who's husbands Presidency delivered the events of 9-11 to our shores, or Barrack Obama who wants to sing 'coom-by-ya' while wearing a turban, it's pretty clear we are going to be a lot safer with John than either of the other two. If the truth be known, it isn't John's development of this mess in Iraq, this has been in the works by others that are now not willing to support him. Ask yourself why. He wants out of Iraq more than any of you know, but he is NOT going to leave our flanks unguarded. Ask him about his plans for the country, the drought, the energy problems, our needs for green living, our carbon footprint, the problems that created the horrible fires these past summers. Ask John specifics, you'll get answers, ask Hillary or Barrack, you'll get spin.

John of Delano Minnesota   February 25th, 2008 4:48 pm ET

Ah hate to break it to ya, but Nadar isn't going to take a single vote away from the Republicans. That guy is going to kill the election for the Democrats once again. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!

Elizabeth   February 25th, 2008 4:47 pm ET

My husband and I just voted early in Dallas for Barack Obama and will caucus on March 4th.

We have supported him from the beginning. My husband is an Iraq war vet and I am a social services caseworker. We need his leadership. We need a wise candidate and not one that changes with the wind

Rodney Dallas TX   February 25th, 2008 4:45 pm ET

Correction: You WILL lose over because of Iraq.

Bob Mold   February 25th, 2008 4:45 pm ET

Saying he "could lose" doesn't equal saying he "will lose", nutbags.

If you're all so dense that you think Obama or Clinton will pull you out of that war and promise you the world, then you deserve to wallow in your delusions. Obama couldn't even show up for Katrina folks, let alone anything else. Silly Democrats falling for charisma and rhetoric again, which is why you're going to lose this election again!

Obamacan   February 25th, 2008 4:44 pm ET

Duhhhh!!!

Gary Dufresne   February 25th, 2008 4:44 pm ET

Withdraw quickly from Iraq? Do we need another 9/11 to wake up? The US got it's wake up call once . How many times have we been attacked since then?
Lets not forget the Dems will tax everyone and the only people that win are the special interest groups

God Bless America and WAKE UP People!
Vote for John McCain

Frank Lee   February 25th, 2008 4:44 pm ET

"I could lose over Iraq" he says?

No, you will lose over Iraq, John.

Bank on it.

John   February 25th, 2008 4:41 pm ET

Never under-estimate the democrats ability to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. This is a party thats lost 8 out of the last 11 cause they run on a platform of blame rather than solutions.

consultantaz   February 25th, 2008 4:41 pm ET

I just have a few questions for our ever not present senator: Just what is the "mission" in Iraq ? Now that we have perhaps some semblance of information on what got us into this quagmire, are you regretting of your vote ? Can you explain how one of the top intelligence agencies in the free world could not "connect the dots "? Where are you on national security while thousands from several countries cross the Arizona border EVERY NIGHT ? And, dare I ask - what did you, as Chair of the Select Committee, do to the Tribal Land Trust Agreement ?
Just a couple of questions from someone who is scared plenty at the prospect of chief War Department cheerleader getting to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue

Jorge Mariani   February 25th, 2008 4:41 pm ET

I would like for any candidate to show its support for our troops and also, to clearly indicate to the world, our commitment to Iraq and to deal strongly with terrorist groups and terrorist support nations, since they are one and the same groups.

Mr Mc Cain will have my vote any day!

Brendan, Philadelphia   February 25th, 2008 4:40 pm ET

MP-Pennsylvania February 25th, 2008 3:55 pm ET

YES IRAQ WAR matters. It drains our resources. The prsident of this country should think about the people here. there health care, education. This is unwanted war. Please let people fight their own wars. If presidents of this country really want to help the world, first set an example here."

Dear MP from PA,

In 2003, I was a Junior in HS, now I am a senior about to graduate in May. As it comes to my recollection, I recall 90% of the population voting to go into Iraq for the war, do you not recall this? Although aware of the WMD scandal, who is to say that President Bush knew of the CIA's errors? As far as I am concerned, it was us the American people who allowed such quick action. We may have been duped, but did we not allow ourselves to do be so. I believe that as a people, as a historical civilization, we will be much better if we are to empower the children and women of Iraq to take a stand against tyranny, injustice, fear and live for a better tomorrow. Is that now what we stood for here in America, freedom from oppression, fear, and tyranny? Think of the sacrafice our brave men of women are giving to provide young children the chance to live and learn from caring people, not homicidal Islamic extremists. Just recall what happened in that school in Russia.

Take that thought with you to the ballot box when you are about to vote for the candidate who best gives those kids a chance to learn and play free from "gang-land" influence and violence (because if we leave, that's who is going to be at the soccer fields, not American troops.).

Jeff from Jersey   February 25th, 2008 4:40 pm ET

Your absolutely right!I probably would have voted for you even though I'm a life long Democrat because of your candor and independent thinking but your position on the war is unthinkable to me and I'll not vote for you BECAUSE of that.Staying there for as long as you think with the HUGE tax increases to pay for it is much more of a national disgrace than leaving would EVER be.Americans are already going without medical insurance,losing their homes and warehousing our seniors.To continue to compound the worst mistake in our history is idiotic AT BEST!

Brian   February 25th, 2008 4:35 pm ET

Hellloo!! Of course the Iraq war matters, it is what is bleeding the money and the life out of our country! It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure that one out. Billions of dollars sent over there completely unaccounted for not to mention the loss of life…and let's not fool ourselves - it is all about money for Uncle Sam and friends.

Mr. Thomas Paine hit the nail right on the head with this undenialble truth -

“To establish any mode to abolish war, however advantageous it might be to Nations, would be to take from such Government the most lucrative of its branches.”

….and this folks is ALL this war is about. Period!

Brian M. From Fort Mill, S.C.   February 25th, 2008 4:34 pm ET

The only way he could convince us that the Iraq war is working is for the Iraqi government to meet most, if not all, of their benchmarks. In other words, he has absolutely no control over them.

His bigger problem is to be able to get more Republicans excited enough to vote. They're not voting in the Primaries, so he shouldn't hold his breath. If more democrats than republicans vote, then you don't have to be smarter than a fifth grader to know that the democrats will win.

Now, for the other problem: Congress! Nobody talks about that. If more democrats than republicans vote in November, then the Democrats will automatcally have a wider majority. That means that, either Obama or Hillary will have a relatively easy time of getting things done.

Michael   February 25th, 2008 4:34 pm ET

To my fellow republicans: how could you not see this? Why nominate someone who is unelectable? Wasn't this your case against Ron Paul? If voters will decide who to elect based on the war…the Ron Paul is and always has been more electable than John McCain. He remains the republicans best shot at the white house.

The revolution will not be televised…

Bruce   February 25th, 2008 4:34 pm ET

I was there in Rocky River, OH this morning and was never so proud to be a Republican. The difference between the parties has never been greater and Senator McClain will make a fine President.

The Democrats are presenting two well qualified candidates so our Country will get the chance to select between the two parties that person who most closely reflects their own ideals.

For me, that person is Senator McClain.

Brian Rehak   February 25th, 2008 4:33 pm ET

A serious 'political gaff' — which means a politician blurted out the truth in a moment of weakness. He can, and he will lose over Iraq.

josh   February 25th, 2008 4:33 pm ET

that picture is priceless

applecrispbetty   February 25th, 2008 4:32 pm ET

Yes, you lose because of Iraq and Nader. You and Nader will split the votes of those who want a 70+ year old crazy head for president.

nic   February 25th, 2008 4:31 pm ET

As if his efforts to maintain Bush's economic policy isn't enough…yes, Senator, there are many reasons why you will lose.

Ben   February 25th, 2008 4:31 pm ET

He just lost!

Tom Johnson New York   February 25th, 2008 4:31 pm ET

I noticed you're only publishing anti-McCain comments here CNN. What gives?

Dennis   February 25th, 2008 4:31 pm ET

Iraq is one of the biggest issues heading into the general election. While I'm not currently one of his supporters, McCain is probably smart to start addressing it now.

Georgette Becker, Imperial Beach, CA   February 25th, 2008 4:31 pm ET

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! At least he's being honest.

Dick---vermont   February 25th, 2008 4:31 pm ET

I am so glad that you decided to run for president, that makes it 100% sure that some one with a brain will be our next president and a dem. george w did a very bad service to your party and I think the people that stayed with him will be history very soon and they deserve it

Robin   February 25th, 2008 4:30 pm ET

Let's face it. If Mrs. Clinton and Mr. McCain run for Nov. 08, then he has a upper hand on Iraq. He supported the war when it was popular and he is supporting it now. She just goes with any direction that wind blows.

Ralph   February 25th, 2008 4:30 pm ET

If he continues to support and endorse that quagmire in Iraq, he should lose. A loss by McCain is a win for America.

John   February 25th, 2008 4:29 pm ET

you know it loser.

McCain = NAIVE   February 25th, 2008 4:28 pm ET

McCain doesn’t understand that no matter how we effective his surge is, it still doen’t negate the fact that it was WRONG to go into Iraq in the first place. Now he wants to stay there forever? Two mistakes do NOT make a right.

How can McCain tell the Iraq government that he is willing to stay in Iraq for 100 years? With that type of logic, Iraq government will not be pressed to fix their government as fast. McCain don’t you know that its not good to tell them this?

McCain’s statement shows how NAÏVE he really is!!!

David B   February 25th, 2008 4:28 pm ET

I won't vote for McCain, and Iraq has a lot to do with it. I'm amazed that he and so many other Bush apologists JUST DON'T GET IT: People like myself never doubted that we could win a war in Iraq — but we know that there was (and is) no reason to have gone to war in Iraq.

So when Bush and McCain try to say 'it's OK, we're going to win the war in Iraq,' they're missing the whole point.

anonymous   February 25th, 2008 4:27 pm ET

Obama is going to rip him on the Iraq war and why we should spend countless years there instead of building our economy.

Ethan   February 25th, 2008 4:27 pm ET

In paragraph three, did McCain really say "I can lead the county," or is that just sloppy journalism by CNN again?

Tom Johnson New York   February 25th, 2008 4:26 pm ET

We need to stay in Iraq until the job is finished — period. Responsible adults don't walk away from a country in the throws of democracy. Wake up America!

Jessica, Michigan   February 25th, 2008 4:26 pm ET

I believe we need to pull out of Ir