<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clinton campaign takes aim at press over coverage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/</link>
	<description>All politics, all the time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:22:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sum Guy</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616966</link>
		<dc:creator>Sum Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 02:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616966</guid>
		<description>Negative...  WOW!!!  What I see is Billary being negative and Obama defending themselves and only then pointing out what the Clintonites are doing.  Obama is clearly trying to unite the party, in fact he&#039;s trying to unite people far beyond the party.  Hill just tries to polarize everyone more and more.  Tell you what, Obama as the nominee will win this election, regardless of what third parties arise.  Hill as nominee will keep the Republicans in office.  I&#039;ll vote third party over Billary Clint, and I bet there are many others as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Negative...  WOW!!!  What I see is Billary being negative and Obama defending themselves and only then pointing out what the Clintonites are doing.  Obama is clearly trying to unite the party, in fact he's trying to unite people far beyond the party.  Hill just tries to polarize everyone more and more.  Tell you what, Obama as the nominee will win this election, regardless of what third parties arise.  Hill as nominee will keep the Republicans in office.  I'll vote third party over Billary Clint, and I bet there are many others as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave in Richmond, VA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616965</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave in Richmond, VA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 02:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616965</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get it.  Is he sunshine and angelic choirs, false hope and empty promises?  Or is he personal attacks and gutter politics.  Seems to me you can&#039;t have it both ways.
Supported NAFTA - check
Won&#039;t release records - check
accepted most lobbying money of any candidate - check
being sued for making promises she never intended to fulfill in return for campaign funds and support(Paul v. Clinton) - check
Slams Obama for a 529 in his favor while pretending she has no control over one her FRIENDS formed in her favor - check

She has lost perspective.  Perhaps she&#039;ll be ready after a bit more seasoning as a Senator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't get it.  Is he sunshine and angelic choirs, false hope and empty promises?  Or is he personal attacks and gutter politics.  Seems to me you can't have it both ways.<br />
Supported NAFTA &#8211; check<br />
Won't release records &#8211; check<br />
accepted most lobbying money of any candidate &#8211; check<br />
being sued for making promises she never intended to fulfill in return for campaign funds and support(Paul v. Clinton) &#8211; check<br />
Slams Obama for a 529 in his favor while pretending she has no control over one her FRIENDS formed in her favor &#8211; check</p>
<p>She has lost perspective.  Perhaps she'll be ready after a bit more seasoning as a Senator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vic nashville,Tn</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616964</link>
		<dc:creator>vic nashville,Tn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 02:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616964</guid>
		<description>Obama is getting free ride  from CNN,NBC, FOX, and CBS ( because these medias need news but not the facts) 
  Now she is back 
Hillary  08</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is getting free ride  from CNN,NBC, FOX, and CBS ( because these medias need news but not the facts)<br />
  Now she is back<br />
Hillary  08</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LL</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616963</link>
		<dc:creator>LL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 02:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616963</guid>
		<description>The reason Obama is getting such good press coverage is because he is running an incredible campaign!!!  He was twenty-plus points down in the national polls when this started and now look where he is. And don&#039;t say it is because of CNN and others in the press.  The analysts are giving their opinions and their opinions seem to be in line with the voters and the momentum...Obama&#039;s campaign has taken a vastly different approach of how to organize and raise money and it has worked.  And yes, the media is reporting that and analysts who have two eyes and rational thought have acknowledged his success in the media.   He has not gone negative and has attacked Clinton only when attacked.   Look, just because Clinton (who is qualified to be President) has run a historically bad campaign and people are reporting on it as they should be does not mean their is a bias...I did not hear complaints from Clinton supporters when she was up in the polls and was seen as the &quot;inevitable&quot; Democratic nominee.  Give credit where credit is due.  Obama has outplayed Clinton in every which way and that is why he is winning and that is what is being reported by the media.   Stop crying just because Hillary is about to be upset like the Russians were upset by a young-upstart group of Americans in hockey in the 1980 Olympics.   Hillary Camp...where is your pride?....where&#039;s your dignity?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason Obama is getting such good press coverage is because he is running an incredible campaign!!!  He was twenty-plus points down in the national polls when this started and now look where he is. And don't say it is because of CNN and others in the press.  The analysts are giving their opinions and their opinions seem to be in line with the voters and the momentum...Obama's campaign has taken a vastly different approach of how to organize and raise money and it has worked.  And yes, the media is reporting that and analysts who have two eyes and rational thought have acknowledged his success in the media.   He has not gone negative and has attacked Clinton only when attacked.   Look, just because Clinton (who is qualified to be President) has run a historically bad campaign and people are reporting on it as they should be does not mean their is a bias...I did not hear complaints from Clinton supporters when she was up in the polls and was seen as the "inevitable" Democratic nominee.  Give credit where credit is due.  Obama has outplayed Clinton in every which way and that is why he is winning and that is what is being reported by the media.   Stop crying just because Hillary is about to be upset like the Russians were upset by a young-upstart group of Americans in hockey in the 1980 Olympics.   Hillary Camp...where is your pride?....where's your dignity?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill in houston</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616962</link>
		<dc:creator>bill in houston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 02:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616962</guid>
		<description>one difference between Obamas attacks and Billary&#039;;s

Obamas are TRUE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one difference between Obamas attacks and Billary';s</p>
<p>Obamas are TRUE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franky</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616961</link>
		<dc:creator>Franky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 02:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616961</guid>
		<description>You know, I think the Hillary campaign is reading my e-mails!!!!!  I&#039;m starting to get superstitious.  Hillary a bit of advice for you..............don&#039;t make me go over there and charge you!  I don&#039;t mind people taking some of my ideas but if I see that it can help you, I&#039;m afraid I&#039;m going to charge.  And plus, you think it&#039;s easy?  It&#039;s not easy sweetheart, it&#039;s not easy...........Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I think the Hillary campaign is reading my e-mails!!!!!  I'm starting to get superstitious.  Hillary a bit of advice for you..............don't make me go over there and charge you!  I don't mind people taking some of my ideas but if I see that it can help you, I'm afraid I'm going to charge.  And plus, you think it's easy?  It's not easy sweetheart, it's not easy...........Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616957</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 02:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616957</guid>
		<description>... Right, because its not the message that&#039;s failed, its the messenger.  The HRC Campaign sounds increasingly desperate by the day now - almost schizophrenic in its messages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>... Right, because its not the message that's failed, its the messenger.  The HRC Campaign sounds increasingly desperate by the day now &#8211; almost schizophrenic in its messages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grace</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616958</link>
		<dc:creator>Grace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 02:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616958</guid>
		<description>Its funny and I just dont get it.  I think Hillary think we Americans are stupid. I started supporting her and sudenly she got very negative, lying and playing nasty tricks. So I as a decent American decide not to support someone who has been nothing but drama driven in the last month. She seems very defensive is really scary.  Hillary just dont act presidential. She acts like we Americans owe the clintons 4 more years. I dont think so Hillarry!!!  I read where you said that NAFTA was one of Bill Sucess story and you did champion NAFTA. Now she is saying that maybe it was not the best idea after all. The point is she did support NAFTA. NAFTA is responsible for many job lost in Ohio over 50,OOO jobs have closed and moved overseas. I have many  relatives in Ohio and because of  NAFTA they lost their jobs. Tomarrow hillary will try to say that she thought at first  NAFTA was good but it has been proven otherwise. The same with the Iraq war she voted for it and then she said that maybe it was not a great idea. Again her campaing is correct when she says anything to get elected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its funny and I just dont get it.  I think Hillary think we Americans are stupid. I started supporting her and sudenly she got very negative, lying and playing nasty tricks. So I as a decent American decide not to support someone who has been nothing but drama driven in the last month. She seems very defensive is really scary.  Hillary just dont act presidential. She acts like we Americans owe the clintons 4 more years. I dont think so Hillarry!!!  I read where you said that NAFTA was one of Bill Sucess story and you did champion NAFTA. Now she is saying that maybe it was not the best idea after all. The point is she did support NAFTA. NAFTA is responsible for many job lost in Ohio over 50,OOO jobs have closed and moved overseas. I have many  relatives in Ohio and because of  NAFTA they lost their jobs. Tomarrow hillary will try to say that she thought at first  NAFTA was good but it has been proven otherwise. The same with the Iraq war she voted for it and then she said that maybe it was not a great idea. Again her campaing is correct when she says anything to get elected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mary</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616956</link>
		<dc:creator>mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 02:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616956</guid>
		<description>Give him your vote but then don&#039;t complain when he doesn&quot;t deliver.  You will get what you asked for and the rest of us will have to suffer thru it as we did when the religious right gave us St. George.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give him your vote but then don't complain when he doesn"t deliver.  You will get what you asked for and the rest of us will have to suffer thru it as we did when the religious right gave us St. George.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pfunk</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616954</link>
		<dc:creator>Pfunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 02:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616954</guid>
		<description>This is hilarious, she&#039;s been using clean tactics?!? pfft I may not have attended Yale, Harvard, Princeton, or even Brown but I certainly wasn&#039;t born yesterday. She&#039;s attacked Obama over &quot;plagiarism&quot;, supporting the Patriot Act (which she supported twice), she&#039;s maintained the idea that he is somehow muslim which has instilled a sense of further alienation towards the islamic community in America, although there is a difference between being muslim and being a terrorist, which sharia law doesn&#039;t even condemn. She&#039;s attacked every entity of his being, whats sad is that, I&#039;m not even islamic, and yet I&#039;m offended by most of her remarks. She&#039;s going to have to fight harder than that to win &quot;sympathy&quot; votes, because lets face it, that&#039;s all she had when she skated into the U.S. Senate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is hilarious, she's been using clean tactics?!? pfft I may not have attended Yale, Harvard, Princeton, or even Brown but I certainly wasn't born yesterday. She's attacked Obama over "plagiarism", supporting the Patriot Act (which she supported twice), she's maintained the idea that he is somehow muslim which has instilled a sense of further alienation towards the islamic community in America, although there is a difference between being muslim and being a terrorist, which sharia law doesn't even condemn. She's attacked every entity of his being, whats sad is that, I'm not even islamic, and yet I'm offended by most of her remarks. She's going to have to fight harder than that to win "sympathy" votes, because lets face it, that's all she had when she skated into the U.S. Senate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick from Houston</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616951</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick from Houston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616951</guid>
		<description>How bout this:

MOST OF THE PEOPLE HERE ARE DEMOCRATS!!!

This kind of tactic, as many of the recent tactics that she has pursued, are VERY DIVISIVE.  This is the type of thing that will lead to disallusionment from the supporters of the losers campaign--this could cause us problems in NOvember trying to reach out to the other side&#039;s supporters.  

I honestly hope, more and more that she does not win the nomination and that she leaves the campaign trail as soon as possible-for the betterment of the party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How bout this:</p>
<p>MOST OF THE PEOPLE HERE ARE DEMOCRATS!!!</p>
<p>This kind of tactic, as many of the recent tactics that she has pursued, are VERY DIVISIVE.  This is the type of thing that will lead to disallusionment from the supporters of the losers campaign&#8211;this could cause us problems in NOvember trying to reach out to the other side's supporters.  </p>
<p>I honestly hope, more and more that she does not win the nomination and that she leaves the campaign trail as soon as possible-for the betterment of the party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marge</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616950</link>
		<dc:creator>marge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616950</guid>
		<description>Aaron Harris   February 25th, 2008 6:06 pm ET

I think the media has given Hillary a bad image. 
 

WRONG!!!!! Hillary already had a bad image!!!! The media is NOT to blame because she is losing!!!!  The media is NOT to blame because she is being &quot;out spent&quot; and out manuvered...
I wish the media attacks could shame her into dropping out!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron Harris   February 25th, 2008 6:06 pm ET</p>
<p>I think the media has given Hillary a bad image. </p>
<p>WRONG!!!!! Hillary already had a bad image!!!! The media is NOT to blame because she is losing!!!!  The media is NOT to blame because she is being "out spent" and out manuvered...<br />
I wish the media attacks could shame her into dropping out!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura-TX</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616949</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura-TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616949</guid>
		<description>Whatever! If Obama does win, it wasn&#039;t HIS win, it was the media and especially CNN. Everyone gave him a break because he is best buds with Oprah and Sharpton. And noone in the media wants them as a enemy.

Hillary is hated by Obama and his cult. 

I&#039;m voting and caucusing for Hillary! 

It&#039;s Hillary or I contemplate another candidate. No Obama cult for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever! If Obama does win, it wasn't HIS win, it was the media and especially CNN. Everyone gave him a break because he is best buds with Oprah and Sharpton. And noone in the media wants them as a enemy.</p>
<p>Hillary is hated by Obama and his cult. </p>
<p>I'm voting and caucusing for Hillary! </p>
<p>It's Hillary or I contemplate another candidate. No Obama cult for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616944</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616944</guid>
		<description>This is my second time stating my opnion.  Now I know why the first one never got printed.  I agree with all those people who says CNN is biased. Obama does no wrong but Hilary is constanly put through the ringer. I think you all should spend a day looking at your prgrams objectively, maybe you will see our point. You also have company, Meet the Press, HardBall, all of of you have never given Hilary a chance, no respect to her supporters. I will say again, Democrats who have already voted were not thinking. This country is in deep crisis and I cannot believe you are putting the job of recovery into the hands of a junior senator based on charisma and speeches instead of Hilary with her experience and achievements. Republicans know better, that&#039;s why they chose Mccain. If Obama wins the nomination, well, it is almost guranateed another 4 years of bushonomics. Go Hilary.
CCN. Please print this.  Don&#039;t be bias.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is my second time stating my opnion.  Now I know why the first one never got printed.  I agree with all those people who says CNN is biased. Obama does no wrong but Hilary is constanly put through the ringer. I think you all should spend a day looking at your prgrams objectively, maybe you will see our point. You also have company, Meet the Press, HardBall, all of of you have never given Hilary a chance, no respect to her supporters. I will say again, Democrats who have already voted were not thinking. This country is in deep crisis and I cannot believe you are putting the job of recovery into the hands of a junior senator based on charisma and speeches instead of Hilary with her experience and achievements. Republicans know better, that's why they chose Mccain. If Obama wins the nomination, well, it is almost guranateed another 4 years of bushonomics. Go Hilary.<br />
CCN. Please print this.  Don't be bias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616943</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616943</guid>
		<description>CNN should be forced to explain how much money they received from Obama and Oprah for airing Obama&#039;s ads on their network.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNN should be forced to explain how much money they received from Obama and Oprah for airing Obama's ads on their network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renee</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616942</link>
		<dc:creator>Renee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616942</guid>
		<description>I agree with Wolfson - the media has been chastizing Hillary ever since she started running for the presidency.  Obama is portrayed as the goody 2 shoes guy while the media faults Hillary for all that is negative.  Hillary is strong, intelligent, and witty.  Obama needs to be called to task, to prove that America does come first...if Hillary did not sing the National Anthem and place her hand over her heart while so doing, the media would have been all over that.  Yet, Senator Obama, is allowed to get away with this.
Obama says he is ready to start day 1 and get it right day 1.  Well, Obama, as a political figure got it wrong on that day he dishonored the American flag and the people of America.!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Wolfson &#8211; the media has been chastizing Hillary ever since she started running for the presidency.  Obama is portrayed as the goody 2 shoes guy while the media faults Hillary for all that is negative.  Hillary is strong, intelligent, and witty.  Obama needs to be called to task, to prove that America does come first...if Hillary did not sing the National Anthem and place her hand over her heart while so doing, the media would have been all over that.  Yet, Senator Obama, is allowed to get away with this.<br />
Obama says he is ready to start day 1 and get it right day 1.  Well, Obama, as a political figure got it wrong on that day he dishonored the American flag and the people of America.!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kc</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616937</link>
		<dc:creator>kc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616937</guid>
		<description>Completely agree. Media never reveals Barack Hussein Obama&#039;s middle name and his Islamic background from his father.

Can anyone name one, just one accomplishment for Obama? MSNBC can&#039;t, Foxnews can&#039;t, CNN can&#039;t, can you? You never thought about it, huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Completely agree. Media never reveals Barack Hussein Obama's middle name and his Islamic background from his father.</p>
<p>Can anyone name one, just one accomplishment for Obama? MSNBC can't, Foxnews can't, CNN can't, can you? You never thought about it, huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: betty</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616935</link>
		<dc:creator>betty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616935</guid>
		<description>shame on Obama.  Shame on CNN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>shame on Obama.  Shame on CNN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy2</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616934</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616934</guid>
		<description>Obama has been negative ever since SC, remember the 4 sheets of paper at the debate. The biggest issue in this race is that anything can be said about HRC, but you have to walk on eggs when you say anything about BHO. That&#039;s a very good deal for him. If whites voted 80% to 90% for Hillary, that would be racial, turn that around and it&#039;s OK. Another good deal for Obama. I wish people would take time to look past the nice words. Where is his record on anything!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama has been negative ever since SC, remember the 4 sheets of paper at the debate. The biggest issue in this race is that anything can be said about HRC, but you have to walk on eggs when you say anything about BHO. That's a very good deal for him. If whites voted 80% to 90% for Hillary, that would be racial, turn that around and it's OK. Another good deal for Obama. I wish people would take time to look past the nice words. Where is his record on anything!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: radi AZ</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616933</link>
		<dc:creator>radi AZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616933</guid>
		<description>CHECK THIS OUT.
Just go trough this blog and count how many mean messages from  
OBAMA supporters are there. It&#039;s gone tell you who is dividing  people,
I Think OBAMA represents this supporters, and NEWS MEDIA is supporting them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CHECK THIS OUT.<br />
Just go trough this blog and count how many mean messages from<br />
OBAMA supporters are there. It's gone tell you who is dividing  people,<br />
I Think OBAMA represents this supporters, and NEWS MEDIA is supporting them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margie in New York</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616932</link>
		<dc:creator>Margie in New York</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616932</guid>
		<description>I have been a supporter of Hillary&#039;s for a few years.  Hillary turned me off because she has changed into an establishment policy toting bureaucrat.  Barack is not running a negative campaign.  He is not distorting her record at all.  This is what campaigning is all about. She should know that.  Hillary&#039;s camp issued a photo of Barack dressed in Somali garb and so what?  Barack is part African and and he is a Christian.  To squash the ignorance of people who have never been outside of the USA, there are times when heads of state travel to other countries, they are required to dress in traditional dress of the countries they visit.  I thought Hillary said she is more experienced than Barack on Foreign Policy.  She should know that issuing that photo was a bunch of ignorance!  That is why her camp is denying circulating that photo!  HA!  Foreign Policy experience my foot!!!

Hillary and her camp on the other hand, has attempted to distort Barack on plagerism, a fairytale of  in-experience, civil rights and list goes on.  Barack has stayed above the fray.  Barack&#039;s campaign has distributed a flyer criticizing her healthcare plan and her vote on Nafta, she is upset?  When you throw a punch, you should be able to take a hit when it comes back at you!   This is political campaigning.  The flyers are is not a personal attack...she should know this, she has been through worse personal attacks.  She has to deal with her husband&#039;s scandal and the personal attacks she had to deal with from it! 

If we did not have this war, it would have been a good time for Hillary to be President, however, the men in the Middle East do not want to speak with a woman and we need to sit and talk to our enemies to work out all of this nonsense with the war!!  Yeah!  Violence is down, why?  Who is paying the insurgents to make it look as if the USA is winning?  The oil barrons are!!! 

So what&#039;s up?!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been a supporter of Hillary's for a few years.  Hillary turned me off because she has changed into an establishment policy toting bureaucrat.  Barack is not running a negative campaign.  He is not distorting her record at all.  This is what campaigning is all about. She should know that.  Hillary's camp issued a photo of Barack dressed in Somali garb and so what?  Barack is part African and and he is a Christian.  To squash the ignorance of people who have never been outside of the USA, there are times when heads of state travel to other countries, they are required to dress in traditional dress of the countries they visit.  I thought Hillary said she is more experienced than Barack on Foreign Policy.  She should know that issuing that photo was a bunch of ignorance!  That is why her camp is denying circulating that photo!  HA!  Foreign Policy experience my foot!!!</p>
<p>Hillary and her camp on the other hand, has attempted to distort Barack on plagerism, a fairytale of  in-experience, civil rights and list goes on.  Barack has stayed above the fray.  Barack's campaign has distributed a flyer criticizing her healthcare plan and her vote on Nafta, she is upset?  When you throw a punch, you should be able to take a hit when it comes back at you!   This is political campaigning.  The flyers are is not a personal attack...she should know this, she has been through worse personal attacks.  She has to deal with her husband's scandal and the personal attacks she had to deal with from it! </p>
<p>If we did not have this war, it would have been a good time for Hillary to be President, however, the men in the Middle East do not want to speak with a woman and we need to sit and talk to our enemies to work out all of this nonsense with the war!!  Yeah!  Violence is down, why?  Who is paying the insurgents to make it look as if the USA is winning?  The oil barrons are!!! </p>
<p>So what's up?!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616931</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616931</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t believe Nader should get any time.  What has he done in the last twenty years  that makes him qualify as a presidential candidate.  His ego  brought him into the race in 2000 and cost the Democrats an election.  How could he have thought Gore and Bush were alike?  It does not say much for his judgment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't believe Nader should get any time.  What has he done in the last twenty years  that makes him qualify as a presidential candidate.  His ego  brought him into the race in 2000 and cost the Democrats an election.  How could he have thought Gore and Bush were alike?  It does not say much for his judgment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sue</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616930</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616930</guid>
		<description>FInally someone speaks out.....I think I have read this on this blog for the past severla months.  Obama biased and now maybe CNN will listen as well as all other reporters</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FInally someone speaks out.....I think I have read this on this blog for the past severla months.  Obama biased and now maybe CNN will listen as well as all other reporters</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: king from toronto</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616929</link>
		<dc:creator>king from toronto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616929</guid>
		<description>so wait! obama wins 11 straight.and he dose not deserve to be rewarded for victories.tell that to olympians.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so wait! obama wins 11 straight.and he dose not deserve to be rewarded for victories.tell that to olympians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moderate dem</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616928</link>
		<dc:creator>moderate dem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616928</guid>
		<description>With you all the way Hillary. You are one of the most steadfast fighters we could have for women&#039;s right, for children&#039;s rights and for the right of every american to have healthcare. The Harvard definition of Universal: Everything minus 15 million.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With you all the way Hillary. You are one of the most steadfast fighters we could have for women's right, for children's rights and for the right of every american to have healthcare. The Harvard definition of Universal: Everything minus 15 million.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tanesha</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616927</link>
		<dc:creator>tanesha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616927</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a non-voting Canadian that is totally glued to the primaries.  I have noticed that the media is almost endorsing Barrack and is very down on Hillary not matter what she does.  Barrack is riding it too.  I think the media is responsible for whoever get elected</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm a non-voting Canadian that is totally glued to the primaries.  I have noticed that the media is almost endorsing Barrack and is very down on Hillary not matter what she does.  Barrack is riding it too.  I think the media is responsible for whoever get elected</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616926</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616926</guid>
		<description>Reading through the comments here I see the same old pattern.  Senator Clinton&#039;s supporters try to counter the media bias for Obama (which is indisputable) and what they get in return is more bias and more hatred.  Now that&#039;s divisive.  Obama is in serious danger of losing a large segment of the Democratic constituency he will need to win in the Fall.  But I doubt that he and his supporters care because they&#039;re too busy right now doing and saying whatever it takes to win.  Politics as usual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading through the comments here I see the same old pattern.  Senator Clinton's supporters try to counter the media bias for Obama (which is indisputable) and what they get in return is more bias and more hatred.  Now that's divisive.  Obama is in serious danger of losing a large segment of the Democratic constituency he will need to win in the Fall.  But I doubt that he and his supporters care because they're too busy right now doing and saying whatever it takes to win.  Politics as usual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan from california</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616925</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan from california</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616925</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe what this democratic primary has become.  I was unsure of who to vote for but went with Obama because I feel he is the best politician for this moment in time.  The rest of the world will see us in a better light with Obama as our President.  With that being said, it is all politics.  Both of these politicians are more concerned about their image than truly addressing a problem and arriving at a solution.  One thing comes to mind in particuliar, both their comments about the housing and loan situation in this country.  Look, you don&#039;t justify stupid actions by consumers who made bad decisions without doing there homework.  If you don&#039;t make enough money to buy a home just because it is packaged in a nifty ARM doesn&#039;t change the reality....You still can&#039;t afford it.  So now Hillary wants to freeze interest rates and put a moratorium on forclosures.  Hello it is called a market economy and if you believe in democracy and capitalism you can&#039;t try to manipulate the market.  Let the homes values fall and the prudent people of this country benefit from the knowing greed of the people who couldn&#039;t afford what they bought.  Obama would never say this because it is politically incorrect but very true.  I don&#039;t care how great your persona, if you are a successful politician you have made some shady deals along the way or you would not be where you are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can't believe what this democratic primary has become.  I was unsure of who to vote for but went with Obama because I feel he is the best politician for this moment in time.  The rest of the world will see us in a better light with Obama as our President.  With that being said, it is all politics.  Both of these politicians are more concerned about their image than truly addressing a problem and arriving at a solution.  One thing comes to mind in particuliar, both their comments about the housing and loan situation in this country.  Look, you don't justify stupid actions by consumers who made bad decisions without doing there homework.  If you don't make enough money to buy a home just because it is packaged in a nifty ARM doesn't change the reality....You still can't afford it.  So now Hillary wants to freeze interest rates and put a moratorium on forclosures.  Hello it is called a market economy and if you believe in democracy and capitalism you can't try to manipulate the market.  Let the homes values fall and the prudent people of this country benefit from the knowing greed of the people who couldn't afford what they bought.  Obama would never say this because it is politically incorrect but very true.  I don't care how great your persona, if you are a successful politician you have made some shady deals along the way or you would not be where you are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616924</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616924</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s about time CNN gets crawled on the carpet for their bias reporting. They didn&#039;t even mention today that Hillary received the endorsement of 27 flag star generals</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's about time CNN gets crawled on the carpet for their bias reporting. They didn't even mention today that Hillary received the endorsement of 27 flag star generals</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jbird</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616923</link>
		<dc:creator>Jbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616923</guid>
		<description>It is clear that the media elite are swept up in Obama mania and nowhere is it more apparent than on CNN. He can do no wrong and senator Clinton can do nothing right according to every analyst on the network.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is clear that the media elite are swept up in Obama mania and nowhere is it more apparent than on CNN. He can do no wrong and senator Clinton can do nothing right according to every analyst on the network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baldwin</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616920</link>
		<dc:creator>baldwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616920</guid>
		<description>MARCH 4
No more devisive tactics,lies,and  THEATRICS.
No more HILLARY.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MARCH 4<br />
No more devisive tactics,lies,and  THEATRICS.<br />
No more HILLARY.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amada</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616918</link>
		<dc:creator>Amada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616918</guid>
		<description>Hillary 08.
glad the truth it coming out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary 08.<br />
glad the truth it coming out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.J. Sproet</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616916</link>
		<dc:creator>C.J. Sproet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616916</guid>
		<description>If Mrs. Clinton wishes to win the election she should, for a starter show a real human face, but instead shows a  plastified and artificial 
behaviour, fitting a cheap cabaret performer but not a presidential 
candidate. Please madam, get real.

Cor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Mrs. Clinton wishes to win the election she should, for a starter show a real human face, but instead shows a  plastified and artificial<br />
behaviour, fitting a cheap cabaret performer but not a presidential<br />
candidate. Please madam, get real.</p>
<p>Cor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616914</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616914</guid>
		<description>Obama is splitting the Democratic Party. He has no hope carrying the Jewish, senior citizen and blue dog vote. He is as liberal as Mondale and possibly as stupid as Gore. I never would have thought that it would be in America&#039;s interest to have 4 more Republican years. I&#039;m on the McCain train, please Mr Maverick, save us from this chamelon and fake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is splitting the Democratic Party. He has no hope carrying the Jewish, senior citizen and blue dog vote. He is as liberal as Mondale and possibly as stupid as Gore. I never would have thought that it would be in America's interest to have 4 more Republican years. I'm on the McCain train, please Mr Maverick, save us from this chamelon and fake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: betty</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616910</link>
		<dc:creator>betty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616910</guid>
		<description>I always wonder wehter CNN is the contributor behind Obama campian.  It is the only reason I can consider why CNN and some reporter continue reporting bias fact and stay behind Obama.  This kind of media should be dimished in US.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always wonder wehter CNN is the contributor behind Obama campian.  It is the only reason I can consider why CNN and some reporter continue reporting bias fact and stay behind Obama.  This kind of media should be dimished in US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rumpusgoopus</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616906</link>
		<dc:creator>rumpusgoopus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616906</guid>
		<description>The reason there&#039;s a difference is because when Clinton attacks Obama, it&#039;s usually a very cheap shot, and usually completely untrue.  When Obama &quot;attacks&quot; (and I&#039;m using the &quot;attack&quot; word here loosely.  A more appropriate word is usually &quot;distinguish&quot;), it&#039;s usually true and not a cheap shot.  Take a look at the latest complaints from the campaigns about each other.  Clinton complained about Obama being a liar and practicing dirty politics by him pointing out reasonable differences in policy (which were true), Obama complains about the Clinton campaign trying to perpetuate the myth that Obama is Muslim.  Honestly, the media hasn&#039;t done nearly enough to point out how negative of a campaign Hillary is running.

Luckily, it appears America is figuring that out on their own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason there's a difference is because when Clinton attacks Obama, it's usually a very cheap shot, and usually completely untrue.  When Obama "attacks" (and I'm using the "attack" word here loosely.  A more appropriate word is usually "distinguish"), it's usually true and not a cheap shot.  Take a look at the latest complaints from the campaigns about each other.  Clinton complained about Obama being a liar and practicing dirty politics by him pointing out reasonable differences in policy (which were true), Obama complains about the Clinton campaign trying to perpetuate the myth that Obama is Muslim.  Honestly, the media hasn't done nearly enough to point out how negative of a campaign Hillary is running.</p>
<p>Luckily, it appears America is figuring that out on their own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hillary08</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616904</link>
		<dc:creator>Hillary08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616904</guid>
		<description>It is such a same that Hillary cannot adequately run her campaign because the media doesn&#039;t really care what she has to say. Any little thing she does she gets negative media press. It is so funny how CNN states they moderate their comments, more select positive feedback for Obama. Such an injustice. Wow this is reverse discrimination now. The black man is getting all the praise and glory and the white woman is being shunned. Wow this is just crazy. I am so disappointed with the media and those of you who are buying into this Obama thing. Obama has been negative towards her, but too bad when you turn on the t.v. that is not what you see. Good job to SNL who noticed this and did a skit on about it. Shame on you Obama and shame on the rest of you who don&#039;t see how biased the media is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is such a same that Hillary cannot adequately run her campaign because the media doesn't really care what she has to say. Any little thing she does she gets negative media press. It is so funny how CNN states they moderate their comments, more select positive feedback for Obama. Such an injustice. Wow this is reverse discrimination now. The black man is getting all the praise and glory and the white woman is being shunned. Wow this is just crazy. I am so disappointed with the media and those of you who are buying into this Obama thing. Obama has been negative towards her, but too bad when you turn on the t.v. that is not what you see. Good job to SNL who noticed this and did a skit on about it. Shame on you Obama and shame on the rest of you who don't see how biased the media is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Keiser</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616901</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Keiser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616901</guid>
		<description>She and her people are manipulative, conniving political agents that blatantly say anything in the hope that it will change the focus from her losing.
Hillary keeps changing faces and one never knows what personality will show up. 

I don&#039;t know if — one day, she is happy or — the next second, she is ready to start war with a country because they made her angry and put out nation at risk. 
   Hang it up Hillary....The fat lady is ready to sing....GO HOME</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She and her people are manipulative, conniving political agents that blatantly say anything in the hope that it will change the focus from her losing.<br />
Hillary keeps changing faces and one never knows what personality will show up. </p>
<p>I don't know if — one day, she is happy or — the next second, she is ready to start war with a country because they made her angry and put out nation at risk.<br />
   Hang it up Hillary....The fat lady is ready to sing....GO HOME</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616899</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616899</guid>
		<description>RE: &quot;YES!!! Finally, someone has the guts to come out and say it. I completely agree with what Howard Wolfson is quoted as saying here.&quot;

Has the guts?  He gets paid to say these things.  It&#039;s his job, people.  

You&#039;re the ones with the guts to keep bringing it up.  And most everytime you&#039;ve brought it up, I&#039;ve checked out the allegations and made up my own mind (as most voters do.)  So thanks for doing that.  

Obama &#039;08!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: "YES!!! Finally, someone has the guts to come out and say it. I completely agree with what Howard Wolfson is quoted as saying here."</p>
<p>Has the guts?  He gets paid to say these things.  It's his job, people.  </p>
<p>You're the ones with the guts to keep bringing it up.  And most everytime you've brought it up, I've checked out the allegations and made up my own mind (as most voters do.)  So thanks for doing that.  </p>
<p>Obama '08!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ava</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616897</link>
		<dc:creator>Ava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616897</guid>
		<description>I am think that you are not that old or your just not that intelligent about what she has done for you and women around this world.

Let me tell you something, I am not the most ardent Clinton fan if I could be considered one at all. But the astounding stupidity of people just sounding off about her is about all that I can take.

She has put a great many womens issues on the for front of Americas politics. Which would have not otherwise made it without her.
She has travel this world over and help a great many helpless and troubled women to find a voice in Nations were women are not considered viable citizens. Where killing women is not a sin. Where beating,stoning, burning, mutilating, raping, degrading women is okay.

So just stop the B.S... She has saved lives and has given a voice to a great many voiceless. She helped and continues to help single women with children who are underpaid if paid at all. She has advocated for those who cannot speak. 

What in heck have any of you whiners done to top that. 

Whether she wins or not , she will continue to help the minorities the voiceless abuse children and women. 

What have you done. What? 

If at anytime in your life that you think anyone will be able to walk into Washington D.C and rid it of corruption, lobbiest, deal cutting you are one of those DELUSIONAL OBAMA FOLLOWERS.

You cut out lobbiest and Corporate America you cut out you jobs. High and Low income.

Get an education on womens issues and how our government works before you People Bash.

Not liking someone for points of view is one thing. To bash on issues that have nothing to do with what is going on is to sell Americas best chances down the drain with narrow minded thinking</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am think that you are not that old or your just not that intelligent about what she has done for you and women around this world.</p>
<p>Let me tell you something, I am not the most ardent Clinton fan if I could be considered one at all. But the astounding stupidity of people just sounding off about her is about all that I can take.</p>
<p>She has put a great many womens issues on the for front of Americas politics. Which would have not otherwise made it without her.<br />
She has travel this world over and help a great many helpless and troubled women to find a voice in Nations were women are not considered viable citizens. Where killing women is not a sin. Where beating,stoning, burning, mutilating, raping, degrading women is okay.</p>
<p>So just stop the B.S... She has saved lives and has given a voice to a great many voiceless. She helped and continues to help single women with children who are underpaid if paid at all. She has advocated for those who cannot speak. </p>
<p>What in heck have any of you whiners done to top that. </p>
<p>Whether she wins or not , she will continue to help the minorities the voiceless abuse children and women. </p>
<p>What have you done. What? </p>
<p>If at anytime in your life that you think anyone will be able to walk into Washington D.C and rid it of corruption, lobbiest, deal cutting you are one of those DELUSIONAL OBAMA FOLLOWERS.</p>
<p>You cut out lobbiest and Corporate America you cut out you jobs. High and Low income.</p>
<p>Get an education on womens issues and how our government works before you People Bash.</p>
<p>Not liking someone for points of view is one thing. To bash on issues that have nothing to do with what is going on is to sell Americas best chances down the drain with narrow minded thinking</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyu Reisch, Radcliff, Kentucky</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616892</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyu Reisch, Radcliff, Kentucky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616892</guid>
		<description>Wolfson, you are right. Obama and his mean wife attacked Hillary from the beginning, media never said one word negative. The Clinton&#039;s said one word, media made a big deal, twisting and look bad. I don&#039;t trust CNN anymore, I cancelled MSNBC and FOXnews month ago, I would better to watch movie than News Channel. All of CNN Political Team are Obama supporters, they spread garbage from their mouth, there&#039;s nothing to listen, they just say whatever is good for Obama. This is crazy and not fair at all. People who supported Obama will regret soon. Hillary, keeping fight, God is in your side, because God knows you are way better than Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wolfson, you are right. Obama and his mean wife attacked Hillary from the beginning, media never said one word negative. The Clinton's said one word, media made a big deal, twisting and look bad. I don't trust CNN anymore, I cancelled MSNBC and FOXnews month ago, I would better to watch movie than News Channel. All of CNN Political Team are Obama supporters, they spread garbage from their mouth, there's nothing to listen, they just say whatever is good for Obama. This is crazy and not fair at all. People who supported Obama will regret soon. Hillary, keeping fight, God is in your side, because God knows you are way better than Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616890</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616890</guid>
		<description>Why can&#039;t the Clinton campaign just suck it up and realize that they are losing because of their own mistakes. It&#039;s not everyone else&#039;s fault. Hillary had every unfair advantage possible going into this campaign and she is now losing which is hard to fathom. You can&#039;t blame the media for following a winner. If Obama was losing he&#039;s be yesterday&#039;s news. But he&#039;s pulling off a modern day political miracle against the odds and that&#039;s a big story, get over it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why can't the Clinton campaign just suck it up and realize that they are losing because of their own mistakes. It's not everyone else's fault. Hillary had every unfair advantage possible going into this campaign and she is now losing which is hard to fathom. You can't blame the media for following a winner. If Obama was losing he's be yesterday's news. But he's pulling off a modern day political miracle against the odds and that's a big story, get over it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandra, CA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616891</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandra, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616891</guid>
		<description>Hillary is not running against Barack, she is running against Americans.  We want our country back, and we won&#039;t get it back with Hillary.  It will stay in hock, as it has been for the last seven years.

Sandra
Dana Point, CA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary is not running against Barack, she is running against Americans.  We want our country back, and we won't get it back with Hillary.  It will stay in hock, as it has been for the last seven years.</p>
<p>Sandra<br />
Dana Point, CA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toulde BOGHE</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616889</link>
		<dc:creator>Toulde BOGHE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616889</guid>
		<description>She was inevitable winner somewhere but now she is inevitable loser….</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She was inevitable winner somewhere but now she is inevitable loser….</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick from Houston</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616887</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick from Houston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616887</guid>
		<description>Lame!!! 

I can&#039;t help but laugh at the whole campaign.  Wolfson is sloppy, and I mean sloppy.

If Hillary Clinton survives Texas and Ohio, she should fire that guy as soon as possible.  He makes her campaign look weak and desperate.

Honestly, I am hoping Obama wins both Texas and Ohio so the entire thing gets done with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lame!!! </p>
<p>I can't help but laugh at the whole campaign.  Wolfson is sloppy, and I mean sloppy.</p>
<p>If Hillary Clinton survives Texas and Ohio, she should fire that guy as soon as possible.  He makes her campaign look weak and desperate.</p>
<p>Honestly, I am hoping Obama wins both Texas and Ohio so the entire thing gets done with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: THANK GOD IT'S FINALLY COMING TO LIGHT NOW</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616886</link>
		<dc:creator>THANK GOD IT'S FINALLY COMING TO LIGHT NOW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616886</guid>
		<description>go Hillary, go!!

go, Hillary, GO!!!



GO, HILLARY, GO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>go Hillary, go!!</p>
<p>go, Hillary, GO!!!</p>
<p>GO, HILLARY, GO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adrie</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616885</link>
		<dc:creator>adrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616885</guid>
		<description>HILLARY HAS BEEN BIASED AGAINST.  OH WELL I GUESS I&#039;LL HAVE TO VOTE FOR NADAR!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HILLARY HAS BEEN BIASED AGAINST.  OH WELL I GUESS I'LL HAVE TO VOTE FOR NADAR!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: THANK GOD IT'S FINALLY COMING TO LIGHT NOW</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616882</link>
		<dc:creator>THANK GOD IT'S FINALLY COMING TO LIGHT NOW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616882</guid>
		<description>hillary will be the eventual winner, anyway</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hillary will be the eventual winner, anyway</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JOHN</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616880</link>
		<dc:creator>JOHN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616880</guid>
		<description>DID SOME ONE SAY NADAR&#039;S GOT MY VOTE, THAT&#039;S IT I CAN&#039;T TAKE ANYMORE, MA MA TAKE ME HOME AND PUT ME TO BED, I&#039;VE HEARD ENOUGH, OMG.  OMG.  OMG.  DID I SAY OMG.?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DID SOME ONE SAY NADAR'S GOT MY VOTE, THAT'S IT I CAN'T TAKE ANYMORE, MA MA TAKE ME HOME AND PUT ME TO BED, I'VE HEARD ENOUGH, OMG.  OMG.  OMG.  DID I SAY OMG.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: changing times</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/26/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616881</link>
		<dc:creator>changing times</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-campaign-takes-aim-at-press-over-coverage/#comment-616881</guid>
		<description>I agree with Kelly.  Everyone must admit no one gave Obama a second thought a year ago.  Hillary was so sure of herself, people just wrote him off and no one bothered to investigate his record or see what he had to offer. 

It&#039;s really a testament to his brilliance and leadership that he took a virtually unknown campaign and brought it to the point it is today.  He did that without ever bringing up any of a number of dubious issues surrounding HIllary and Bill still to this day.  He never smeared her personally or tried to humiliate her.  Now all of you want to hate him because he&#039;s done such a good job that he&#039;s overshadowed Hillary.  

The press as well as many others are amazed at the savyness, intelligence and leadership of what he&#039;s accomplished and none of you can deny what a great job he&#039;s done agains such a well known name as Clinton-give him credit.   That&#039;s news what more can be said?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Kelly.  Everyone must admit no one gave Obama a second thought a year ago.  Hillary was so sure of herself, people just wrote him off and no one bothered to investigate his record or see what he had to offer. </p>
<p>It's really a testament to his brilliance and leadership that he took a virtually unknown campaign and brought it to the point it is today.  He did that without ever bringing up any of a number of dubious issues surrounding HIllary and Bill still to this day.  He never smeared her personally or tried to humiliate her.  Now all of you want to hate him because he's done such a good job that he's overshadowed Hillary.  </p>
<p>The press as well as many others are amazed at the savyness, intelligence and leadership of what he's accomplished and none of you can deny what a great job he's done agains such a well known name as Clinton-give him credit.   That's news what more can be said?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
