March 1, 2008
Posted: 12:58 PM ET

From ,
 Clinton last appeared on Stewart's show in 2003.
Clinton last appeared on Stewart's show in 2003.

(CNN) – Sen. Hillary Clinton is scheduled to appear on Comedy Central’s ‘The Daily Show’ on Monday, March 3, according to a press release by the cable outlet.

Clinton has previously appeared on the political talk show but her upcoming appearance will be the first since announcing her run for the White House in 2007.

The scheduled appearance comes a day before crucial primaries in Ohio, Texas, Rhode Island, and Vermont where some pundits believe Clinton must do well in order to keep herself in the race for the Democratic nomination.

Sens. Barack Obama and John McCain, the two other leading contenders for the White House, have both appeared on the popular show since the presidential campaign started in early 2007.

–CNN’s Sasha Johnson and Martina Stewart

Filed under: Hillary Clinton


DP   March 1st, 2008 5:48 pm ET

God Bless you Hillary! HILLARY 2008

Garry   March 1st, 2008 5:01 pm ET

HILLARY WILL WIN! What's happening to you people? Hillary is the best person for the job!

Wake up!

Hang on President Hillary Clinton! Wow that sounds good.

melody   March 1st, 2008 5:01 pm ET

I am a woman, white, physician and although someone who has positive discrimination towards women, I support Obama in this race. It is not a matter of age, experience, it is rather vision and being able to inspire people (Remember Bill Clinton, he was a great presedent). It's rather general understanding which I see in Obama. However, Clinton wold make a good president. But I believe Obama would make better..

Laura   March 1st, 2008 4:58 pm ET

Ronaldo since Madeline Albright is not a natural born US citizen, she is not eligible to become president.

lorraine   March 1st, 2008 4:57 pm ET

Hillary is right about the free trade- in British Columbia which is in Canada our forestry which used to be the number one industry is almost a thing of the past, some of the free trade act good – others do need to be be looked at, nothing wrong with that as you do not know how somethings work till you try it. Hope everyone remembers to go and vote for Hillary, also I think it is kind of a good thing to have someone like Bill Clinton there for her to chit chat with as he too is very brilliant and has a remarkable knowledge of the whole world and what is really happening in it.

Edward Cottongim   March 1st, 2008 4:57 pm ET

I have never voted for a Republican, if Obama wins, I will vote Republican for the first time.

Jayjay   March 1st, 2008 4:56 pm ET

Hillary Clinton is the right person to be President at the right time. Folks, I'm from downstate Illinois, and oh boy, do we know better than to trust Chicago politicians!

Laura   March 1st, 2008 4:55 pm ET

I don't see Obama on with O'Reilly either.

Joan   March 1st, 2008 4:55 pm ET

Hillary will be great on the show. She has a great sense of humor. I'm rooting for her not because she's a woman….I'm voting for her because I am!
How naive people are. Do you really think Barack Hussein Obama will change anything in Washington? The real change is that someone other than GW Bush will be in the White House; that's real change. Someone needs to tell Obama that the President doesn't run Congress; so what change is he suggesting? All he says about change is he want to change 'the way Washington does business'. What does that mean? He's part of Washington sitting as Senator from Illinois. I don't think a community organizer has the qualifications to run the US. It's so sad to see how many people are fooled by words. Very sad, indeed.

Allah   March 1st, 2008 4:53 pm ET

Barack HUSSEIN Obama – Louis Farrakhan

Jane   March 1st, 2008 4:53 pm ET

Hillary has already lost! She can't catch up. If she stays in too long (like Huckabee) all she does it hurt her future viability and damage the party's chances in November.

Please Hillary, for the sake of the party, do the right thing! Please drop out after March 4th.

You will make a fine Senate majority leader. I hope you will send President Obama your health care plan so he can sign it!!!!!!!!

~~G O D E M O C R A T S 2 0 0 8 !!!!!!!!!!!!!~~

April   March 1st, 2008 4:48 pm ET

Reality check- there is no piece of legislation of value that Hilary has proposed for New Yorkers. Recognition of a lacrosse team or naming a street or building for Thurgood Marshall, do not count as change for New Yorkers at large. I think the Clinton entitlement train needs to stop somewhere in Buffalo.
Go Obama!!!

Holly, Kansas City, MO   March 1st, 2008 4:48 pm ET

Gosh, I love it when people (mostly Hillary people) type in all capital letters. When intelligent comments can't be produced, JUST YELL!! The louder you yell and cry, the more it makes you correct!! I think they have been watching their leader HRC too much these days…

Tom   March 1st, 2008 4:46 pm ET

Whose audience has the bigger collection of kooks, dupes, freaks, fools and idiots: Stewart's, Bill Maher's or Stephen Colbutt's?

Holly, Kansas City, MO   March 1st, 2008 4:45 pm ET

Thank you for the warning CNN. Now I can cancel my regularly scheduled "Daily Show" viewing. ^__^

serina   March 1st, 2008 4:44 pm ET

my only question is why are the africans americans not screaming racism when their leaders who support Hillary are being pressured to switch to Obama?
I am just wondering what the Obama folks call that?

kris   March 1st, 2008 4:44 pm ET

get you tissues ready

Why won't she go away   March 1st, 2008 4:43 pm ET

Mrs. Clinton is such a drag. She has no idea how to connect with people because she has no true feelings for anyone but herself. She thinks everything she feels, thinks, says, does, etc is absofreakinglutley the only correct way, and if you don't concur there is something wrong with you! She is a cold self serving individual. I don't think we can take the chance to let her become president, because she might throw a hissy fit after she answers the phone at 3 o'clock in the morning…

Do you want the many faces of Hill or do you want the rock solid consistent moral judgement of Barack? I'll take the latter, thank you very much!

All I want to resonate is …YES WE CAN.

Obama '08

Lucy   March 1st, 2008 4:40 pm ET

I hope she gives her concession speech on the Daily Show.

John   March 1st, 2008 4:37 pm ET

Hillary 2008!!!!

I just saw her in Fort Worth and she was wonderful. She has a ton of support here in TEXAS.

Hillary….We've got your back here in Texas!!!!!!!

Ronaldo   March 1st, 2008 4:37 pm ET

Pat Stone 2 words bro: "Spell check"

VOTE OBAMA   March 1st, 2008 4:34 pm ET

I strongly dislike the word "experience" and I love
the word "momentum".

OBAMA POWELL 2008

:)   March 1st, 2008 4:33 pm ET

Clinton is anywhere where there is free publicity.

cordova   March 1st, 2008 4:31 pm ET

Obama held to one solid message consistently, Hillary changed her messages constantly,
Obama maintained his competent campaign staff, Hillary had to let go of some of her staff.
Obama's organization especially in caucus states was superior to Hillary's,
Obama showed how to run Fiscally responsible campaign, Hillary and McCain had serious financial troubles.

Obama ran his campaign successfully, Hillary did not.

We don't want fighters like Hillary. We want achievers like Obama.

Just Me   March 1st, 2008 4:30 pm ET

Why is it that none of the candidates do not mention Native American issues. All concerns are of white, black and hispanics. Native Americans have serious issues to.

A concerned american voter who supports Obama.

Kelly Anne   March 1st, 2008 4:30 pm ET

For the sake of the party, Hillary, please do the RIGHT THING and drop out now!!!!!!!!!!!!

Danielle, OH   March 1st, 2008 4:30 pm ET

We cant let Obama win the nomination! I have never voted republican and I would like to be a lifelong democrat.

Christine Dohlmar   March 1st, 2008 4:29 pm ET

Elaine gets some help. I would advise you don't watch Jon Stewart Monday, you may explode. Go Hillary!

Ronaldo   March 1st, 2008 4:29 pm ET

Tanya in Chicago:
Blah Blah blah!!!….. And what can Billary do??? what experience does she have ???other than having her husband do her homework for her??? "is America ready for a women president"?? Yes..Yes Yes….is america ready for Billary Clinton as president/???No..No…No!!! really Tanya you need to stop voting with your emotions…Billary is not the right "Women " for the Job…On my mothers eyes I would vote for Madeline Albright, or Nancy Pelosi before I vote for Billary…If you want to stand up for a woman president who has made her own history and not riding the coat tails of her husbands deeds as president

Realist - DP, IL   March 1st, 2008 4:27 pm ET

Some pundits/pontificators are saying Clinton has do like 58-42 to get even thats a spread of 14%, Obama been doin better than that
HI – 76-24
WI – 58-41
D.C. 75-24
MD – 60-37
VA 64-35
ME – 59-40
LA – 57-36
NE 68-32
US VI – 90-8
WA – 68-31
(% from NyTimes.com) Margin/Avg-my nice excel work
State Obama Clinton Margin
Hawaii » 76% 24% 52%
Wisconsin » 58% 41% 17%
District of Columbia » 75% 24% 51%
Maryland results » 60% 37% 23%
Virginia results » 64% 35% 29%
Maine » 59% 40% 19%
Louisiana results » 57% 36% 21%
Nebraska results » 68% 32% 36%
Virgin Islands results » 90% 8% 82%
Washington results » 68% 31% 37%
Average = 37%
Average (WI,MD,VA,WA) = 27%

Obama (11-0)
Hillary (0-11)

Power to the People

Fuzzy Math Free Since '99

Chris, Orlando, FL   March 1st, 2008 4:26 pm ET

GOOD! We love you Hillary!

MARYLOU JONES   March 1st, 2008 4:16 pm ET

OH QUIT WITH THE OBAMA OPPOSED THE WAR!! HE GAVE A SPEECH. WHICH PROBABLY WASN'T EVEN HIS WORDS!! THAT'S IT! HE DIDN'T HAVE TO VOTE ON IT. HE WASN'T EVEN IN THE SENATE THEN. THEN HE SAYS 2 YEARS LATER, WELL, I AM NOT SURE WHICH WAY I WOULD HAVE VOTED. FLIP FLOP, FLIP FLOP. OBAMA SAYS ANYTHING TO WIN. HE HAS ABSOLUTELY NO EXPERIENCE IN FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO SPEAK OF. EXPERIENCE DOES COUNT!! IT COUNTS IN EVERY PHASE OF LIFE SO WHY IN THE WORLD WOULD YOU GIVE THE JOB OF PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES TO A ROOKIE?? OUR ECONOMY IS CIRCLING THE DRAIN!!! OUR DOLLAR IS WAY DOWN AGAINST FOREIGN CURRENCY. WE ARE STRUGGLING TO STAY AFLOAT AND WAGING A WAR ON TWO FRONTS. OUR INFRASTRUCTURES ARE COLLASPING. BEEN TO THE GROCERY STORE LATELY?? WE NEED SOMEONE WITH EXPERIENCE IN THE WHITE HOUSE ON DAY 1. IT MUST BE HILLARY CLINTON IF WE ARE GOING TO MAKE IT THROUGH THIS RECESSION. VOTE HILLARY CLINTON FOR PRESIDENT!

d   March 1st, 2008 4:13 pm ET

wow, the comments were interesting; must admit, this primary is way to long in duration; on with the show; hillary has 2 votes in this household; i don't see obama as a worker; needs more time as a senator or governor; not mature enough to run this nation; i feel he is getting his ideas from advisors; then makes pretty speeches; "were almost there" or does that mean "i have a dream" someone elses dream; if its not hillary, then it must be mc cain.

Bubba   March 1st, 2008 4:12 pm ET

will she cry when Jon asks a question?

Bubba   March 1st, 2008 4:11 pm ET

in tx, yes

Brenda from Texas   March 1st, 2008 4:07 pm ET

Go Hillary…..

Hillary '08

Marguerite Nash   March 1st, 2008 4:01 pm ET

Was I the only one that read the artitcle on Senator Clinton taking $170,000 for her campaign from a disbarred attorney from a troubled firm? She pretends to fight for women and yet as I read the article, I was confused whether she is actually standing up for women or the money meant more to her than the women she says she cares about.

You can read the article on MSNBC/

Shame on you Hillary!!!!

RAFi68   March 1st, 2008 3:58 pm ET

why you dont put the things that i write in here , do i make a good point cnn…

Ann, MO   March 1st, 2008 3:54 pm ET

Interesting poll on CNN today. Have you ever embellished your resume? 77% say No. Maybe that is why Hillary is losing. People do not like the fact that Hillary is staking claim to her husband's resume.

CHRIS NY   March 1st, 2008 3:52 pm ET

Can Republicans vote in a Democratic Primary???

Lee   March 1st, 2008 3:40 pm ET

Vote for Hillary "The Joker" is on her side!

Greg   March 1st, 2008 3:39 pm ET

Maybe he could ask her about the Superior court case in California
Clintons vs Peter Paul for Campaign Finance Fraud, should get a laugh

John - Spokane, WA   March 1st, 2008 3:36 pm ET

Good move for Hillary ! New poll today shows 81% of people asked said Obama is getting a free ride from the media and is going easy on him. Only 19% said Hillary was getting the free ride. Appearantly this is overwhelmingly obvious in the media on the coddling of Obama. Hillary also gets endorsement today from 5 star General .

HERE COMES HILLARY !!

Becky Montgomery   March 1st, 2008 3:29 pm ET

I love Jon Stewart and can't wait to see this. He is VERY intelligent and perceptive and will ask good questions. I don't know that she will "get" his sense of humor and tone. The audience will be younger, smart people. That's all I am saying….

KAREN   March 1st, 2008 3:24 pm ET

Has everyone forgotten about Michigan and Florida?? Hillary won both which if counted would put her easily ahead of Mr Obama.
The people in Michigan and Florida should not be punished for getting out and voting….the popular vote should count above all!!!
I wish the African American nation would realize what is really at stake here and vote for a person who can get the job done instead of having to just say " We can"

Lori   March 1st, 2008 3:24 pm ET

Rise Hillary Rise!!

vincentjohn   March 1st, 2008 3:22 pm ET

Hillary on Jon Stewart…. give me a break… Why doesn't she want to go Bill O'Reilly or another fox news show…… What is she afraid O" Reilly will rip her another butt hole….. Hillary you and your bunch of wimps should pack it in and go home…..

O'Reilly has asked you so many times, what are your so very afraid of…. Simple questions that you can't answer… Shame on you…

Jon Stewart that's so lame….

GoHills   March 1st, 2008 3:22 pm ET

Time for OBAMA to drop out of the race. He's done. Stick a fork in him. The only people voting for him are Repubs who know he can't beat their guy. It's time to elect a REAL candidate… Hillary Clinton! Come on Democrats, don't be so naive… you know that a large portion of Obama's votes are from Repubs who don't have to vote for their own party now that McOldy has the nomination all but wrapped up. Come general election time, those same voters will be voting for McOldy and Obama will lose this race and we will have ANOTHER 4 years of GWBush's policies… we cannot AFFORD this!!! Be smart, vote Hillary!

HILLARY '08!!

Obama all the way....   March 1st, 2008 2:55 pm ET

And this is newsworthy????? I think John Stewart should be concerned about his ratings! I bet money on the fact that she is practicing an * authentic, emotional connection* moment in front of a mirror right now! Welling up a tear or two to sway the women voters in Ohio and Texas. Well, I am a women voter …..and I won't fall for her load of fake crap!!!!

GOBAMA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Robert   March 1st, 2008 2:30 pm ET

I think some people need to think about what they are saying before they say it. Obama's "present" votes are perfectly normal in the Illinois Leg. It's a way of asking for compromise or amendment, NOT a way to duck the hard choices. People here are saying that Obama is all inspiration but not perspiration. Well, the Clinton campaign is worried about his large ground forces overwhelming them in the Texas Caucuses BECAUSE of their hard work for Obama. That's what inspiration does. It LEADS. It motivates people to action. The president doesn't "work hard and make change happen." The president inspires thousands or even millions of people to act in sync to make that change happen. Clinton has a few fat cats funding her campaign because of what she can do for them. Obama has convinced over a million individuals to donate to him because they know he can do what's best for the country.

Pia   March 1st, 2008 2:30 pm ET

Any third rate actress would jump at the chance for free television exposure and Hillary Clinton is no exception.

ZAREH   March 1st, 2008 2:30 pm ET

. HILLARY IS THE BEST FOR THIS COUNTRY, PEOPLE OPEN YOU EYS DONT FOOL WITH THE WORDS—SHE IS THE ONE

Kate   March 1st, 2008 2:27 pm ET

Hey
I'm not American but am still intensly following the run for US presidency. Just wanted to say that here in Europe people will have to stifle their laughter in case this Obama buffoon is elected in November. After Bush, just another sign for not taking the US seriously anymore. McCain or Clinton give a much stronger impression and show leadership skills where Obama is just talking and talking and talking….

yaumb   March 1st, 2008 2:27 pm ET

I love all this talk about Hillary's "experience." Fact is, John McCain has more political experience and goodwill built up – on BOTH sides of the aisle – than anyone in the race.

Obama appeals to the Utopians, but translating that Utopia from the high-level concept down to the practical application is something that nobody in his campaign or, to be frank, his supporting throng really knows how to do.

Clinton is relying strongly on her gender and the few good echoes that still resonate from her husband's presidency – but in terms of her own experience she has precious little more than Obama does as a legislator in her own right. As a spouse, sure, she has years… but unless we accept the idea of Bill Clinton being the puppet for Hillary that doesn't really count.

Sadly, the large majority of the American people still seem to see this election in soundbites and rhetoric instead of voting with their conscience on the issues. For me, John McCain is far from the perfect candidate… but he is certainly the best option when you consider who else is eligible.

Chris   March 1st, 2008 2:26 pm ET

This is unbelievable. How can people support Hillary?

2 of her biggest arguments – Health care and Nafta. Nafta is good for country but she flip flops when she visits states like Ohio. Healthcare? Well didn't you have 2 TERMS Of presidency with your husband as president. If you did not get something done in 2 terms , how will you get it done in next 4 years?

Obama – doesn't have experience but at least he looks sincere.

McCain – Has experience but in last few years he seems to be making a pact with the devil just to win the republican nominaton.

Out of the 3 evils – I will pick Obama because he has less experience in being one.

donna   March 1st, 2008 2:26 pm ET

I saw the response from Obama to Hillary's 3 am call add. I thought it rather amusing that his response was the real threat was from afganistan and yet he can't be bothered to hold a meeting regarding afganistan in the committee he chairs, after all if that is where the real threat came from should he be more involved and concerned in keeping the country safe to at least hold meetings regarding it.

E. C., Houston, Texas   March 1st, 2008 2:25 pm ET

Good for Senator Clinton, who in the last week has shown the Voters just how unqualified Obama is for the position of President…..

michael   March 1st, 2008 2:23 pm ET

Sen. Clinton accepts donations from troubled firm
1 march

pd4hillary   March 1st, 2008 2:23 pm ET

I don't care about Hillary's tax returns, I care about mine. That is why I am voting for Hillary. The slime attacks of the Republicans have been adopted by the Obama supporters. Let's drag out every personal item on them and find something to hammer about for years. I don't care because no one is ever perfect about anything, but if you have some memory, you will remember how well we all did in the 90s with the Clintons. For goodness sakes, recognize that they know how to run an economy!! And, right now, that is all I care about. I don't care if the person who drove us in the ditch is the same person that can drive us out of it. Just get us out. My sense is that the person driving us in the ditch, still has more driving skills than the one who has never driven. Not only that take into account the amount of hydroplaning we hit. Come on and let's get real about winning the election in November, getting the economy back on track, getting everyone healthcare and start enjoying a prosperous and peaceful life again. The Clintons– and yes I count both of them, because they have always had a deep intellectual respect for each other and have always drawn on each other for decision making– they know how to run a country!
Do you want out of Iraq? vote Clinton
Do you want to turn the economy around? vote Clinton
Do you want to once and for all have universal health care? Vote Clinton
Do you want core Democratic values to become part of mainstream American values again? Vote Clinton
This is a no-brainer!!

Athan from MD.   March 1st, 2008 2:23 pm ET

if BO wins in Texas will be ONLY BECAUSE REPUBLICANS WILL VOTE FOR HIM.

"With John McCain well ahead in the race for the Republican presidential nomination, and because Texans can vote in either party's primary, Republicans have been voting in the Democratic race, University of Houston political scientist Richard Murray said."

WAKE UP DEMS.. VOTE HILLARY!!

Peg   March 1st, 2008 2:23 pm ET

LET'S GET THIS THING OVER WITH! i'M TIRED OF IT ALL! HOPEFULLY THE DEMOCRATIC POWERS THAT BE WILL END IT VERY, VERY, VERY SOON.

WE'VE HAD ENOUGH AND THE PARTY NEEDS TO FOCUS ON ONE CANDIDATE AND MOVE FORWARD!

PS in VA   March 1st, 2008 2:23 pm ET

VL—NO, I am not 18, thanks though. I know who BIll Clinton is, I voted for him!

I also remember George Bush running against Bill Clinton saying he was the most experienced candidate and Clinton lacked experience. Ironically, Bill's argument was that he gained real experience working with ordinary people instead of gaining it in Washington.

Well, can't Obama use the same argument Bill Clinton used against George Bush. If being a governor is the only experence needed to become president, then Huckabee would be the only candidate qualified in this election.

Shey   March 1st, 2008 2:21 pm ET

Despite everything she's done during this campaign I will not vote for Hillary under any circumstances, even if it means sitting out this election, I will not vote for McCain either.

Hillary lost my vote forever when she consistently rolled over and played dead and fetched for Bush. She's been Bush and Co's lapdog for the past several years……….UNTIL it wasn't prudent to do so because NOW she wants to be president.

IF you've been paying attention for longer than the past 6 months…you'd know this is the truth.

tito   March 1st, 2008 2:21 pm ET

Obama is the one who can beat Republicans in November! Independents and Republicans will support Obama in November because he is reaching across the party lines! Can Hillary win republicans or independent voters, not really? She is so divisive person and everyone will vote for McCain come November! Don’t give republicans chance in November and Vote Obama!

sivananthi   March 1st, 2008 2:21 pm ET

FOR THE FIRST TIIME IN THE NEAR PAST SHE CAN TALK TO THE VOTERS DIRECTLY WITHOUT MEDIA INTERPRETING NEGATIVELY WHAT SHE IS SAYING ………………………………….

From School of hard knoks   March 1st, 2008 2:20 pm ET

CNN, and to most of your reporters Like Don King called Hillary supporters" the lunch bucket crowd those type of Democrats " This one of my main reason for supporting Hillary's I'm sick of CNN reporters putting Hillary hopefuls down. Some of the your reporters if not all have continued to say the "Well Educated and the Wealthy," Meaning that someone like myself and my family are not Educated. The NPR crowed are not with Hillary. This is just not true. I would say its the opposite.
So i will never again look at CNN without the knowledge that you are never going to give the straight news to American citizen! We have lost something very vital. So many vital parts to our country are in ashes, we walk in the fog of disillusionment of what our country has become. We can no longer expect the news media to be unbiased unopinionated or acting in our country's best interest.

abby   March 1st, 2008 2:19 pm ET

I'm hoping for Hillary to make it! I still haven't figured out what Obama stands for. In the several debates that I have seen he points fingers at her and drops a bunch of names (Ted Kennedy, etc…) Atleast she has a plan and has the experience to know how to follow up and make these plans happen!

Clinton in '08!

None of the Above   March 1st, 2008 2:18 pm ET

Obama, Hillary, McCain…they are all the same person. None of them are willing to press any change that the country needs because they are all puppets to Special Interests aka Big Corporations. They can't make any real moves without releasing the bonds of their masters. The only candidate that had any chance of real change was the one that hadn't already served up their soul on a silver platter to Big Business…. Ron Paul. But since he chose not to pander to special interests, Big Media has intentionally ignored him, thus never giving a chance to a politician that won't scratch the backs of the other candidates masters. They don't want him to have any chance because they know he would uphold the great Constitution of this country that has been torn to bits, not for just the past 8 years, but for the past 100 years! He wants to abolish the Federal Reserve System which is a non-government institution OWNED BY THE BIGGEST BANKS IN THE WORLD!

You want change? You think that things are bad and only going to get worse? Go take a in-depth study of the Constitution and see exactly what is wrong with this country and where it went wrong! You'll see that anyone who is funded by the huge banks (all Obama, Clinton and McCain's top 10 campaign contributors are 3-5 of the biggest US banks, which coincidentally all are member banks of the Fed) will have no chance at any real change that can make a true difference. You'll see! You'll see! WAKE UP! WAKE UP!

Jan E   March 1st, 2008 2:18 pm ET

As a resident on upstate New York, let me tell you …

This premise that Hillary has "experience" is puzzling and is being used by her supporters as a given!! I know that Obama is focusing on her lack of good judgment but that is because this is the more obvious of her shortcomings. If we put aside her lack of good judgment for a second, anyone who is accepting her "experience" has a lot of education to go through. Hillary got into power mainly because of her husband's influence in the party and not on her own merits, to deny that is unreasonable. She got the powerful position as the NY Senator after her husband twisted few arms and called in favors from the NY power brokers. She never had a history in NY to run on nor the qualifications to warrant it. As a resident in her district in New York, I see nothing but misery around me from her lack of action to help upstate areas. This is real folks!! not politics. She has been representing this area since she was elected and the people here are baffled how she won again after failing miserably in her first term!!

I am not saying there was fraud or anything like that, but suffice to say that people here are depressed and have become cynical about the system that they are tuning out and giving up, allowing her and her husband's influence to trump the representation process.

If you are supporting Hillary because of her so called experience, look at what she has done to her constituents in NY. We are the ones who had that "experience" with her, and it was not a good one!!

Abby   March 1st, 2008 2:18 pm ET

March is Women History Month. Yeeeaaaah Hillary will make history!!!!

Shirley in California   March 1st, 2008 2:18 pm ET

Juan Carlos(Vegas): I understand that you and many others have the fear that Obama might be targeted by the republicans. Let me tell you, he will be. And, Hillary will be too! So far, we have seen a whinny, angry, sarcastic Hillary who plays racial, gender, fear cards on the public and demonstrates the jaw-dropping worst of the dirty politics when she is frustrated and when facing challenge from her party opponent. She is there struggling to figure out what to do and yet to get a solution to her problem for several weeks now. Juan, can she really face any other challenges? So far, she is a joke!

Politra   March 1st, 2008 2:17 pm ET

Hilary Clinton is simply a political mediocre. She can only act as commander in chief, but never can truly perform that. Compared to her ability she has already gained more than enough. For her, politics is a way of building someone’s carrier. That is why she could compromise with her husband few years ago.

Brian   March 1st, 2008 2:17 pm ET

I hope she has learned how to sing opera…..

zerville   March 1st, 2008 2:15 pm ET

I am getting sick of people touting Hillary an experienced and capable in this Presidential race..
I think her opponent has failed to challenge this free ride all along..

Also she claims her plans has details while her opponent lack details.. I have read both plans on economy, healthcare and policies..But she has no better details than Obama!!!

Where is Hillary 35 yrs of experience from?
By being the first lady for Bill Clinton for 8 yrs?
By being a Senator and not really known for any major legislative but the costly and wrong decisions of Iraq war?

The only Healthcare project she is known for during Bill years failed due to her serious inabaility to work with others but have it her way..

So where is her proof of credibility for God's sake??? What pivotal goverment position has she held to prove this credibility and experience pitch?

Hilary has not held a goverment position apart from being the first lady and then a senator with nothing major done.

She is more known for her high temperament and uncontrollable personality that cannot handle presssure of leadership but hides under the umbrella of fighting for the people as an excuse for irate tempers and inability to handle perceived defeats.

let's call it what it is and stop this illusion..

dean   March 1st, 2008 1:58 pm ET

well, jeez, now she's on t.v. making lots of promises but failing to mention how she will raise the taxes to do it.
you better start saving and hiding your money before she chases more jobs out of the country.

James   March 1st, 2008 1:57 pm ET

Hillary, for the good of the party, please DROP OUT NOW!!!!!

Quit gracefully, otherwise you will ruin the DNC chances in November against the RNC.

PLEASE HILLARY, DO THE RIGHT THING!!!!!!

Devin   March 1st, 2008 1:56 pm ET

If experience truly was what mattered in this election, Bill Richardson would be the President in 2009.

Anonymous   March 1st, 2008 1:56 pm ET

these two phoneys deserve each other

Athan from MD.   March 1st, 2008 1:56 pm ET

If BO wins will be ONLY BECAUSE REPUBLICANS WILL VOTE FOR HIM.

"With John McCain well ahead in the race for the Republican presidential nomination, and because Texans can vote in either party's primary, Republicans have been voting in the Democratic race, University of Houston political scientist Richard Murray said."

WAKE UP DEMS.. VOTE HILLARY!!

kate   March 1st, 2008 1:53 pm ET

How long is Obama going to go on about the mistake of going to war? We all get it. We shouldn't have done it. But make no mistake, he didn't vote for it because he couldn't. The fact is, we are there. The real issue now is how are we going to get out? Immediately as he claims, I don't think so and neither does Obama. Instead of cheering wildly at his rallies, listen to what he is saying. It is not much. We all want change, but who can provide it? Don't fall for all the hype….go with the facts.

Ray   March 1st, 2008 1:52 pm ET

Clinton can't win against McCain because her disapproval rating is too high. Obama polls well against McCain and is our only hope of having a Dem in the White House. Both candidates are great – one can win, the other cannot.

I'm honestly interested in this answer (please CNN give me a chance to ask the question) – just exactly what rabbit will Hillary pull out of her hat to win the general election in '08? Do you believe Clinton will somehow, after all these years in public life, suddenly win over the people who are averse to her? How will this happen? She will lose against McCain according to every data point I've seen. If you don't think so, tell me why not!

Obama '08

king from toronto   March 1st, 2008 1:51 pm ET

bill was a year younger than obama when he ran fro president,had no experience.yet the same people who voted for him,is sayin the same thing about obama.i'm confused!lol you people make me laugh,lol obama o8

Rod   March 1st, 2008 1:51 pm ET

Way to go Anthony make the youth of America seem like they don't matter. DId you learn this tactic from Hillary? She seems to be able to avoid whole states like they don't matter too.
Good job.
11 Wins and counting straight for Obama. Thats not just the informed young people in America. Nice try

Rolly Txs.   March 1st, 2008 1:50 pm ET

Those people who are attending concert for Obama are not really voting for him, they just want to hear and see the performer. Obama will loss this nimination I am very confident. He had lots of donations from his brothers and sisters from the mosque but I know people will realize this soon and will put him nothing but on the stage just to deliver poem of concession which is his masterpiece.

Jim   March 1st, 2008 1:50 pm ET

Thank God this will be over March 5th. Then all of you Clintonistas can return to the American Idol message boards.

Kevin Topeka, KS   March 1st, 2008 1:31 pm ET

No one can convince me that race is not an issue in this election campaign. 85 to 90% of the African American vote going to Obama!?!!. Come on!! That kind of percentage can only be based on bias. I would say the same thing if Hillary were getting 85% of the female vote. But she's not. Who would have known that the Hillary would lose that kind of support from African Americans, after all the Clinton's have done for all minorities in this country. But she did. It is a shame.

Tony, nm   March 1st, 2008 1:21 pm ET

seems that Hillary Clinton's supporters have decided to inundate the commentaries lately

which I think is a good thing

it's quite interesting to finally see who these people ARE and what they have to say about their candidate

But as an Obama supporter, who of course believes in the power of words to transform lives and offer direction in scary times, I am not very moved by angry, bitter, even sometimes hateful attacks against the man I feel is the better choice.

I hope the great state of Texas, my neighbor, votes overwhelmingly for Barack Obama. In my view, His actions speak louder than Her words.

Juan Carlos(Vegas)   March 1st, 2008 1:20 pm ET

Tanya From Chicago, I wish my English were as well as yours to be more explicit when I write. I agree Obama is a successful senator, but he does not have the experience to lead this country. The republican will do everything to hold the power. Obama has not seen the republican machine working to hold the power. People cry when between democrats are attacks, let's wait the generals. We'll have the dirties presidential run, Obama will be attacked ( license for illegals,his color, his middle name, etc, etc.) and we'll see him falling down.

Hillary For Ohio   March 1st, 2008 1:20 pm ET

HILLARY 08!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Johnny Hodge   March 1st, 2008 1:20 pm ET

I am with Hillary all the way. I don't believe someone has to have a ding-a-ling to be President and it doesn't scare me to have a strong woman who is brilliant and tough, over a man scared of his own history with a wife who does not fully respect America (until her husband was running for President). AS FOR ARCADE FIRE THE BAND: ouch Arcade Fire. I used to have respect for you. Your albums and lyrics made it seem like you understood the world. How mistaken was I? At the end of the day EXPERIENCE, REAL STRENGTH (see Hillary), and CREDIBILITY (not afraid of your own history) really matter. I am a true Democrat who believes that if a candidate does not know how to handle tough issues (see RUSSIA, CHINA, ETC.) then I cannot support them. and no having a SUPER TEAM around you doesn't count (see GW BUSH). I have been proud of America since I was born. Nobody is perfect and to pretend so makes you arrogant and stupid. Do bands do this to increase album sales by the way? I hope not….or to be seen as having picked the COOL PERSON over the PRACTICAL. Pathetic indeed. REMEMBER picking the cool person over the practical smart one gave us GW BUSH instead of AL GORE. (in the electoral college anyway-lol)

Laurence "Keeping it real"   March 1st, 2008 1:19 pm ET

Let's stop being delusional. Hillary has no chance to win. Evidence of this is in her campaign spinning this B.S. about Obama having to win all four of the upcoming primaries by wide margines to justify all the money his campaign has spent on them. Boo hoo! Poor Hillary can't get out of her own way. He has won 11 straight state elections by huge margines and she still gets the benefit of the doubt in the bias media. What does this man have to do? After defeats on Tuesday Hillary will be expected to bow out gracefully. If she doesn't she will reduced to a disgraceful exit. And in the aftermath to follow, the democrat(ic) party may be mortally wounded in the process. Right now she has become the democrat(ic) party's worst enemy. That's what you get when you have this high-minded belief that the world owes you something. In this case it's the United States of America owing her the presidency. Thank goodness for reasonable people this time around. Obama '08

CMouzourakis   March 1st, 2008 1:19 pm ET

When my guy friend (a closeted sexist) said Sen. Clinton does not deserve to be elected because she cries for votes (and only well-known because of her husband), I had to see it for myself. I missed those times when she, according to him, was blubbering like a toddler during a tantrum. So, my friend and I looked for those videos on YouTube. Her voice wavered and her eyes looked a little misty, but we felt she showed a little humanity, not expecting sympathy votes.
Bravo, Tanya! Well said.

beckett70   March 1st, 2008 1:19 pm ET

I'm glad she is going on Comedy Central. It lends credence to the fact that Hilary is a a fun loving, happy, and very humerous individual. That is not widely known and it should be . Some people think she is just a
dry ,policy ridden, and pragmatic individual, and that is just not true.

anthony   March 1st, 2008 1:19 pm ET

I am a 49 year old Democrat and have voted in numerous presidential elections.I consider myself very well educated and versed on many issues facing not only democrats but the country. I am very dismayed that suddenly 18 year olds are driving the focus of this campaign, a demographic that in the past has shown very little interest in the issues. I think Obama is a great campaigner, however it is not enough to vote for someone simply because they are young, give great speeches and seem to embody change. I am sure most people who are voting for Obama are doing so only because of the momentum his campaign has mustered regardless of whether they really know any substantive issues he proposes. Politics has become a popularity contest driven by the media.

Tanya, Chicago   March 1st, 2008 1:17 pm ET

Just to be clear, I am not a paid HRC staffer. I wish someone paid me for my views. I am just someone who is worried about the economy and the other issues mentioned in my post. Glad that I could make atleast few people think…

former hillary supporter. Jumping ship   March 1st, 2008 1:16 pm ET

i was for hillary but not anymore. she is in the way. her fall is inevitable. evacuate the titanic or you will fall with her.

Dick Pittenger   March 1st, 2008 1:16 pm ET

When Obama came out against the War, he was in a crucial campaign running for the Illinois Senate. It was at a time when everyone wanted to bomb Iraq back to the Stone Age. He took a great risk, but courageously pointed out all the hazards of going to war with a nation 60% Shiite, and a 3rd rate power that even if it had WMD, it had no navy, no air force, no ICBM's, no way to in any way challenge the safety of the U.S. Hillary caved at a time when she needed to be strong. Please don't insult our intelligence by claiming that Obama would have done the same thing as she if he had been in the US Senate instead of running for Illinois Senate. He combines extraordinary intelligence with an unmatched courage to hold unpopular positions.
I am hopeful Obama will lead the Democratic Party back to its historic liberal stance, and away from the Clinton-era submission to Newt Gingrich's Contract With America, which should have read Contract With Rich America.

Rebecca - Fresno, CA   March 1st, 2008 1:15 pm ET

Good for Hillary that she has such loyal supporters. For those of us who don't, the experience mantra just doesn't resinate. I, for one, took a very close look at her "experience" and found her experience as an elected legislator to be less than Sen Obama. For me, her experience as First Lady is inconsequential with regards to actually being the president. I mean she is definitely qualified to write a book about the presidency from her perspective. Overall, I find them equally qualified.

What we are left with are to choose between the candidates themselves and their approaches to governing. If you believe an open-minded fresh approach can open new avenues toward progress, you support Obama. If you believe age translates into experience and partisonship will allow for progress, then Hillary might be your choice. I have chosen Obama 08, not for his ability to give a great speech, but for his proven ability to unite others around a common goal and move things forward (just look at his campaign as poof of that)….. the future is bright!

doug   March 1st, 2008 1:15 pm ET

now the last 4 times i have posted on this site they remove it, so lets see if this one makes it. i want to know what the media is going to do to go after Obama's camp for stealing Hillary's video. if the tides were turned they sure would be going after her. i think the media has been so unfair to her, they have questioned everything about her but not 1 time have i seen them question anything about Obama, not 1 time. what are you all affraid of. what is the problem with questioning Obama about anything. why aren't you doing it. i am so sick of the media giving him the green light at every corner while you give the red light to Hillary everytime. and the biggest culprits are M.S.N.B.C AND CNN. I AM LOOSING MY INTEREST IN WATCHING THESE SHOW'S. i would hate to stop watching but i just cant sit here and see the one sidedness of these 2 stations. i am very disappointed.

Steve   March 1st, 2008 1:14 pm ET

I've read a lot fo coment above that all kinds of emotions will appear on The Daily Show, and htat Hillary will or will not bash Obama. For those of you who have not seen this show, IT'S A COMEDY SHOW!
The people being interviewed are generally given about 5 minutes in between 11 advertisements to state their case, or plug their book, or talk about their movie. John Stewart, who is an incredibly bright and well-informed guy, is a master at controlling the situation. I expect Hillary to talk about herself (duh), and make veiled references to Barack. She won't cry, and she won't get nasty. The audience won't let her do it, and neigher will John Stewart. John will tease her about various things, she'll laugh, say a few sound bites, and it'll all be over.
Larry King, this ain't.

Juanita   March 1st, 2008 1:14 pm ET

To Alice Rea: thank you for the compliment that only the young who don't remember Amerian/World History are voting for Obama. Wow! I'm still young.
I'm a 61 year old retired white female professional. My first memory of politics is the 1952 presidential election. My dad was so certain Stevenson would win and as we listened to the radio for election results he got mad that Stevenson wasn't winning. I can remember the Korean conflict and when a truce was announced. I remember John and Jackie Kennedy coming to Milton-Freewater, OR to campaign in May 1960 and the list goes on.
I'm not a "robot" to Obama; I'm not on medication, I'm not mesmerized by Obama.
Hilary supporters shouldn't insult those who do support Obama. It will most likely backfire if Hilary does get the nomination and we remember how we were taunted for our support of her opposition.

Matt B   March 1st, 2008 1:14 pm ET

Too bad Stewart is clearly for McCain. They are totally old pals now.
I hope Barack goes on the Colbert Report!

Interesting   March 1st, 2008 1:13 pm ET

1. Polls say McCain will beat Hillary.
2. Polls say Obama will beat McCain.
3. Being a fighter in Washington gets nothing done. Proof, Hillary as 1st Lady with Healthcare.
4. The value of Experience depends on the type of experience. Bush Sr ran the CIA & was still a horrible president. Clinton is so divisive that while she might be right on issues, Washington won't let her get anything done.

Obama will have the will of the people on his side. He will win a landslide, (that's what republicans believe).

Also, the press mentioned this only a few times, that many of Hillary's super delegates are endorsing her out of fear. The Clintons run almost a fund raising mafia. That's why Obama has made huge contributions to super delegates, to show he can provide just as the Clintons.

Rowena of Texas   March 1st, 2008 1:12 pm ET

Obama supporters, what are you prouds about Obama? His lies and speeches? Is this the man you like to be your leader? He's trying to convince people that he's Christian because mostly Americans are christians. And better check carefully, he's donations mostly came from his own religious sector. Mostly postings who support Obama came from one person with different aliases. Anyway, I am very confident that you gonna loss, lots of talks no action.

kROCK   March 1st, 2008 1:12 pm ET

Nice to see the voice of Hillary supporters actually being displayed on CNN!

I'm extremely proud of my fellow Americans that are waking up from the star-gazing that is the "American Idol" factor.

Just look at the records, the facts.. they will lead you to HILLARY for President!

Do some digging… speeches of Obama's dating back to 2004 until now.. just watch the complete change in opinion!

TEXAS 4 HILLARY!

Jin Wong   March 1st, 2008 1:11 pm ET

Hillary has shown strong leadership. She appears very calm in going on for the campain despite of loosing last few states. That is a kind of person we need to lead our country. She is the best choice for our presiden.

Mark   March 1st, 2008 1:11 pm ET

Good idea. Showing humor = being human.

Peter   March 1st, 2008 1:11 pm ET

If I were an Obama supporter, I'd be sick of the experience argument too since he's on the losing end of it – and most of his foreign policy experience took place by the time he was ten years old.

If a well run campaign were the mark of a qualified president, perhaps Obama's campaign manager should be president. Perhaps Karl Rove should be president for life.

The Daily Show should be enjoyable, two people who actually know what they're talking about.

nadeem   March 1st, 2008 1:10 pm ET

Newsweek has a great line

"the Clinton post Feb 5th strategy has reminded us of th bush Post Iqar invasion strategy – non-existent"

Bev   March 1st, 2008 1:09 pm ET

Is Hillary auditioning for a job as a stand up comic? Did her mocking of Obama during her speech at the rally give her the idea that maybe she can become a stand up comic if she fails in her bid for the Whitehouse or is she planning on joining hubby on the speakers trail as the comic relief? Hillary doesn't strike me as someone who can laugh at herself. She takes herself and her program to seriously. So we can expect that she will use the comedy to mock her opponent and mean every word of it. My opinion is that she won't mean it as a joke even if she claims it is.

Kim in Ohio   March 1st, 2008 1:09 pm ET

To Joe in Florida – You are exactly on target! Why isn't Senator Obama outraged that Democrats in Florida were disenfranchised? Although I have voted for Democratic presidential candidates for over 30 years, if Obama is the nominee, my vote will be for McCain in the general election. I've studied political science and done my research – it's the only choice I will have since I didn't drink the kool -aid.

David Galazyn   March 1st, 2008 1:09 pm ET

Do you want to know what is scary? The Clinton supporters have picked up Stockholm Syndrome from the Mrs. C. The media is not biased toward Obama. I love all these posting like "CNN WONT POST THIS CAUSE I HILLARY" (Note the bad grammar, obviously Clinton supporters don't have spell check on their computers, but it think the last sentence of this paragraph explains why). CNN has been posting the comments that people leave as long as they are not prejudiced in anyway. Many of the Clinton Supporters are becoming aggravated that so much has gone wrong with their candidate. Her activities as of late, are somewhat wishy-washy and people do not know what to make of her as a person. Obama was such a good packaged candidate that he sold himself easily to a lot of Americans. The only reason you now see pro-Clinton comments is because her campaign is forwarding these postings to her supporters. Now they say things are fair, however that is not the case. Lets be realistic any hardcore democrat is not going to vote for McCain because they are upset over Hillary losing. Those are just the words of Clinton supporters trying to scare other people into voting for her.

To you Clinton supporters you really have to be more careful with your words. You are starting to come across looking crazy.

Dylan from CA   March 1st, 2008 1:09 pm ET

I simply cannot fathom how Hillary, her campaign and her fembots that post on this site think they will garner support for her by insulting Obama's supporters over and over again.

I watch the debates beginning to end, I have read both plans for change, I have more than informed myself on the qualifications and vision of the candidates… and I chose Obama.

The more I am told I am part of a "cult" or "dilusional" or "uninformed," and the more I hear "Hillary or McCain," the more I understand how completely out of touch Hillary and a large percentage of her supporters (although most of her supporters actually do have common sense.) It's time for YOU to wake up.

Adam H   March 1st, 2008 1:08 pm ET

Anybody taking bets that she will cry?

Apostolos   March 1st, 2008 1:08 pm ET

They're both great and I'd like either one of them to win. I just wish they hadn't had to run against each other.

Tim   March 1st, 2008 1:08 pm ET

How much do you want to bet that she tries to find a moment to cry on the show.

Pathetic. Desperate.

It's time to go back to the trailer, Hillary.

Robert Bergley   March 1st, 2008 1:07 pm ET

It's really impressive how Hillary's few supporters on campus, on campus, are being urged (at least by each other) to surge upon the CNN comment section to give the misguided impression that Hillary has more support in Texas.

Why would anyone want to elect someone to office that has to have the people in their campaign resort to these sorts of tactics?

The bottom line is that Hillary's "experience" has supported lots of bad legislation and represents that she's further entrenched in a system with a lot of flaws and problems.

Change means new blood and a new perspective in Washington.

We've seen time and time again how the Clintons let the Republicans run ramrod all over them.

Let us not forget how they tried to kick Bill out of office any way possible, they hate Hillary just as much and are going to resort to the same sort of tactics and gum up the works on capital hill.

Don't forget:

HILLARY SUPPORTED THE PATRIOT ACT AND THE WAR IN IRAQ

It isn't a long composed, well-drafted argument for voting for Obama because it DOESN'T HAVE TO BE.

If you can sum up why she shouldn't be president in so few words, that really says something.

mir   March 1st, 2008 1:07 pm ET

So what will Obama say now, that going on the Jon Stewart program = fear mongering???! The only problem with Obama is he contrives fiction from fact. Sorry, but painting Hillary as the fear candidate, who's now appearing on -Oh NO, The Daily Show (that will sure scare *everybody*) –is the heart of the problem. He's deflecting the fact of his limited experience and fictionalizing his own limitations by framing the judgment card. Huh. At 3am, as someone posted, Obama will hit the snooze button and hope the problem will go away in his dreams.

Ed, Philly   March 1st, 2008 1:06 pm ET

Hillary's chances of beating Obama in the delegate count is slim to none. IF she becomes the Democratic nominee, it will be the best possible thing for the Republican party.

The Democrats have the Congress majority and they can't get anything accompished.

Now she may lose Texas, so suddenly the TX caucus system is not proper.

Hillary is the definition of what's wrong with this country. If things turn bad, it's not my fault. It's Obama's enormous spend on commerials, it's his negative flyers, it's the TX voting system, it's the Bush administration. Maybe GW should shed a tear during the national address.

Ann Aloha FairMedia, PA   March 1st, 2008 1:06 pm ET

At least we know Jon Stewart won't spin the show to favor Senator Obama…the way the media does to glorify him…
Nevertheless when to right change takes place…I hope all the people that polarized Senator Obama(especially the media) will eat their crow well and not cry about it.

Patty   March 1st, 2008 1:06 pm ET

You know it is a real eye opener reading comments such as these. A vast majority of the Obama supporters express their support for him by repeating the same mantra of invectives against Hillary. They tout her lack of experience yet feel Obama's lack is not a problem. They disregard any criticism of Obama as being unfair journalism but just relish when a negative story appears again about Hillary. For those who feel he so likeable to fix the world, then remember he thinks Canada has a President, and he knew absolutely nothing about the new leader to be of Russia. He also hinted that when he pulled out of Iraq and if AlQaida continued or strengthened, he would do whatever, which was to me reinvading and pulling another George Bush routine which is the opposite of what Obama is using as his sole platform to run on – I was against the war. So now he thinks it would be fine to reinvade Iraq if needed?????? Sorry, to go back to another thread here, I want Hillary answering that phone at 3:00 AM. The rock star, eloquent speaker image will soon fade and I want to know what more is behind that facade before it is too late.

Inquiring minds of Central California   March 1st, 2008 1:06 pm ET

Nobody cares. File Hillary clinton under the Bill Richardson and other has-beens category.

Ken   March 1st, 2008 1:06 pm ET

To all of you who think Hillary is the best choice to be our next president, I have this to say :

WAKE UP !!!

She and Bill have had this plan since the early 70's. He would run and hopefully become president, and then a few presidential terms later, she would run because he was so charming. Well, they're trying to fulfill that dream. Unfortunately, Bill was not so charming. A great speaker, I'll give you that. But charming? Hell no. Snake charmer, maybe!!

She makes all kinds of campaign promises when running. Just as she did when she ran for the Senate seat in 2000. But she did not fulfill those promises. In fact, NY is worse off because of her.

Obama on the other hand has done alot of wonderful things as a State Senator of Illinois, and as a United States Senator. He has really helped the poor and disabled citizens of Illinois and has the good of the people in mind when voting for the various bills. And for those of you who will say "he only voted "present" for several of the bills that were put in front of him"… remember, he explained why he voted "present". He could not, in good conscience, vote "yea" for the bill in the wording that it was being presented. So by voting "present", it would not get approved in the way it was worded, and could be revised and re-submitted.

This guy has shown that he really cares about the American people. Hillary has shown that she only cares about herself.

Please try and see the difference.

Krishna & Ranga   March 1st, 2008 1:06 pm ET

One time correct vote by Obama does not mean better judgement for all time to come. nor Hillary is going to be wrong every time. As is human every President has judged issues correctly & incorrectly. Ultimately it is the experience folks. From childhood till death we always have to bank on experience and draw from it as we grow.. It iis therefore good for our nation if we vote for a person with more accumulated experience and among Democrats that person appears to be Hillary.

Jefferson Madison   March 1st, 2008 1:04 pm ET

How could Hillary possibly win against McCain? She is running EXACTLY THE SAME CAMPAIGN!!

jt   March 1st, 2008 1:03 pm ET

Hillary will win! More smarter!! More polished!!!

Obama still sleeping having a dream!! Wake up do something in Afghanistan, you are the chairman of the sucommittee that has something to do with NATO (that has troops fighting there). You have not done anything except good speeches.

Obama did not vote for the Iraq war, because he was not in the senate at that time. He was just a war protestor. He did not have the privelage to see the strong evidence provided that we needed to go to war. If he did, he probably voted for it just like most of them did.

Now he is now in the senate and has the responsibility to do something in Afghanistan. He is not doing anything. He is just making speeches saying he could have done better. Like what, not doing anything…just talking? speeches??

Hillary is a better choice!!. She is smarter!! More polished!!.

B. Smart   March 1st, 2008 1:03 pm ET

Here we go again. Its about the same old faces on the same old talk
shows. Same old faces. Clinton,Bush,Clinton,Bush…………….

OBAMA 08.

Jed in Texas   March 1st, 2008 1:03 pm ET

Hillary can be funny Im sure but the last thing we need now is another comedian in the White House.Look what Mr.Chuckles has done for us.I would rather see her cry and mean it and THEN GET MAD AS HELL AND DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT. I have more respect for horse thieves than for Texas politicians or any other ones for that matter, they are the lowest form of life on Earth.

Steve R., New York   March 1st, 2008 1:03 pm ET

This country and the world are ready for someone like Obama. He should choose Joe Biden as his running mate. Biden, or someone like him (Bill Richardson?) will bring the added experience that some are concerned about. Such a change will be a breath of fresh air to Americans and our allies who want to respect us again. Today, America is widely despised and not trusted by many of our allies after seven years of manipulation by Bush/Cheney.

Obama is practical on matters such as civil liberties, foreign relations, and restoring jobs in America. Most importantly, he spoke out strongly against the Bush/Cheney spin machine which McCain and Clinton bought into regarding Iraq. Someone posted that 90% of America supported the Iraq war at the time. Please, 90%?..a lot of people were bamboozeled but I suspect the quiet majority was strongly opposed to this illegal attack on a sovereign nation.

Hillary continues to insult our intelligence when she proclaims "had I known then what I know now, I would not have supported the war."

I'm no smarter than Hillary, but I knew. How? I read and listen. We were lied to and the press reported we were being lied to. One example? Go back and read Joe Wilson's op-ed in the NY Times in the run-up to the war. We were told by Cheney, Rumsfeld, Bush, Rice, and others that we were unpatriotic if we questioned the reasons for going to war. I'm glad that Obama questioned it.

Now McCain scares us with such self serving comments as, 'if we withdraw from Iraq, then our brave men and women in uniform will have died in vain'. Sadly, they did die in vain. These innocent victims followed the orders of their deceiptful Commander In Chief and were sent in to kill innocent Iraqis.

Obama simply wishes to end the madness. I fully support his intent to withdraw. Iraqis can never allow us to "win" after we killed so many of their brothers and sisters. Besides there is no war to win; it continues to be nothing more than an illegal attack. We have nothing against Iraq except for their past leader.

I look forward to voting for Barack Obama as a statement to try to restore our standing in the world as we try to seek peaceful relations with other countries, like-minded or not.

vl   March 1st, 2008 1:03 pm ET

To PS in VA, ………..ah, excuse me, Bill Clinton was the Gov. of Arkansas….just so you know. You must be like what, 18?

Tim Richardson   March 1st, 2008 12:51 pm ET

My fellow Americans: John F Kennedy did not have much experience either but he kept us from going into world war III. The country needs a new direction. But what scares me the most is that President Bush and the elite will rig the election…Now we all know how the democrats are turning out in large numbers,the largest in our natin's history..Yet President Bush told reporters with so much confidence that he guarantees that Mccain will wiin in Novermber and that he will be there to help him. Now that sounds pretty scary to me…Please we must look out for the possibility that they will rig the election. How can stop it? Remember who's ever President, will have experience advisors around them…

Jim   March 1st, 2008 12:41 pm ET

I would rather see a new Wilmore piece or even a Hodgman reair.

marge   March 1st, 2008 12:40 pm ET

AR March 1st, 2008 10:20 am ET

At least logic won't be required. Latest example – HRC campaign says Obama will be in trouble if he doesn't win all of the contests next Tuesday because he spent so much. I guess that's why we had president Perot and why Mitt Romney is the Republican nominee, right…? no…wait

Who is advisng her????? This was the most senseless statement they have made thus far.
The pressuer is NOT on Obama …its ON Hillary…
She is BEHIND in delelgates…She has LOST 11 straight!
Obama doesn't even have to win,and will still be rewarded MORE delegates than Hillary. Its all about the delegates!!!!!!
*******IT"S DO OR DIE FOR BILLARY TUESDAY ..MAKE NO DOUBT ABOUT IT***********

Terry   March 1st, 2008 12:40 pm ET

Hillary Says She Can 'Answer Phone' my 2 years old do some thing…LOL

ClintonNever   March 1st, 2008 12:39 pm ET

Tanya – Aren't you the one that works for HRC campaign?

Come on! You people make me sick. This is one reason why we shouldn't want to have Hillary to be the democratic nominee for the presidential race, leave alone becoming the president.

CNN – Not even 1 of the 100s of comments I said so far have been posted. THANKS! And I have no idea why people (INCLUDING the candidate herself) whine about media's bias for Mr. Obama. What a bunch of losers.

MARILANA   March 1st, 2008 12:37 pm ET

OBAMA DIDN'T VOTE FOR THE WAR, BECAUSE HE WASN'T THERE. HE HAS ONLY BEEN IN THE SENTATE FOR 3 YEARS. HE WASN'T EVEN PRESENT. HE ONLY MADE A SPEECH AT A RALLY. DON'T BE FOOLED…TEXAS, OHIO, PENNSYLVANIA, VERMONT…VOTE HILLARY CLINTON!!

maggie   March 1st, 2008 12:37 pm ET

Good Luck, Hillary! We love you!

Bill   March 1st, 2008 12:37 pm ET

If your biggest argument against Hillary is that she will cry, then you are really mis-informed. First, she has never cried. This is stupidty at its best. I must ask why are Obama supporters so hateful toward Senator Clinton. I can atleast understand the republican position, but not Obama supporters. You all come across looking silly. You claim your more intelligent, yet you have no real argument against Clinton and most of you can not support real reasons for your own candidate to be elected.
Bash Hillary as much as you like. It shows your imaturity and true lack of knowledge on this women. All the things that are thrown out here are rumors and speculation, nothing factual. The facts are..Hillary is the most experianced, best qualified and should be our next President. Also, the women who dislike her seem to be even nastier. Is there some jealousy going on??

Hillary will always be thier for us, regardless of the outcome of this election. Smart people should really look at the issues that face this country and vote for substance over super stardom.

Also, I watch the Daily Show every day. I have never seen anyone boo Clinton.

BkMSW   March 1st, 2008 12:35 pm ET

Lets see if CNN posts this, as I frequently comment on these articles and have yet to see my comments posted.

Am I the only one who thinks Hillary is VERY UNSTABLE?? I am sorry. While I believe we do need someone in the White House with experience, I also believe that we need a leader who can keep their COOL. Period. Not some hothead who gets aggressive because something is "personal" to her.

Obama '08

phil   March 1st, 2008 12:34 pm ET

I guess I missed the foreign policy and economic experience Hillary Clinton has?

lin   March 1st, 2008 12:33 pm ET

CNN

Cyndi, MD   March 1st, 2008 12:27 pm ET

Hillary couldn't get her health care plan done 15 years ago – and that was with an ally in the white house – her husband. What makes her think she can do it now? She is so polarzing!! No republicans would ever vote for her health care plan! They would go out of their way to make sure she fails – again!

Obama has the right leadership skills to get everyone excited about making positive changes for the whole country. That is what it is going to take. You need to be able to get other people to join your effort. That is the only way any health care plan is going to get approved by congress.

She knows she has NO WAY of ever getting ANYTHING through congress – she lacks the leadership skills to accomplish anything in congress – unless she agrees to another tax break for the republicans!

We NEED Obama to lead this country. He has what it takes!

kathleen   March 1st, 2008 12:16 pm ET

For the people that think Hillary is getting a bad rap with
CNN and the media is that Hillary showed her true colors
and Obama is an honest man. Did anyone ever tell Hillary
the "Honesty is the Best Policy." NO. I can't listen to her
voice and cackel of a laugh. I believe the same women
that will vote for Hillary are the same ones that voted for
BUSH. Come on tell the truth, DID YOU VOTE FOR BUSH?

The nastiness that began in this DNC race, began with
Hillary. Obama just goes about his business until SHE
attacks him!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Mark   March 1st, 2008 12:15 pm ET

Why is CNN approving these 4 paragraph comments that are obviously generated by activist campaign groups? seriously guys… moderate well or not at all?

Mark   March 1st, 2008 12:10 pm ET

No one would have even known of Hillary if it wasn't for Bill

Anonymous   March 1st, 2008 12:07 pm ET

cnn shame on you…all your presidential news coverage leans in favor of obama..give Hiliary a chance…Thank you

Liz   March 1st, 2008 12:05 pm ET

As a onetime Hillary supporter, I have found that Senator Obama is the better choice (as apparently, a majority of Democratic voters have all over the country). The more I learned about Hillary, the more uneasy I became. It is not just her traditionally old "machine politics" of slash, burn, and blame, but frankly, she is too difficult to admire or even like (reminds me of Richard Nixon).

Obama may not be perfect, and he is not the messiah the media likes to make him out to be, but he is a leader people will follow. He is a uniter (and I am sick of the Clinton "blame game"), he is certainly likable, and finally, he is NOT named Bush or Clinton!

NO TO HILLARY   March 1st, 2008 12:05 pm ET

I believe that most of the people that want Hillary to win
were stupid enough to vote for Bush TWICE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

steve   March 1st, 2008 12:05 pm ET

Obama is a cheerleader, we need a LEADER.

Obama stop copying Hillary's programs, stop copying speeches, stop copying slogans.

You will not fool me Obama!

Shannon   March 1st, 2008 12:05 pm ET

Shrillery and McBush are not the future of this country. It will be business as usual. More lives lost in Iraq, continued high prices at the pump, and useless leadership.

Not to mention slick Willy roaming the WH, if Shrillary wins. Yes, Shrillery will be able to complete her stolen Wh china collection, but what will the people get.

I would vote for Shrillery in a minute if she were honest, but she's not, so she will NEVER get my vote. Vote for a selfish, self-centered liar if you want. I won't sell my soul so that Shrillery can be the first female president.

America deserves a leader who cares about them, not self-centered ambitions.

Obama 08

Maureen Mack   March 1st, 2008 12:04 pm ET

I have never donated to a political campaign before this year. However, I have donated to Hillary Clinton, the last time just last night, primarily in response to the overwhelming television/media pundits calling the election ahead of time in favor of Obama. The continual bashing of Clinton and the nature of the remarks is plain sexism. What I would like to say to the men out there who still fear a woman as the president of the United States is: "It will be okay. You will be okay. Change IS hard. "

Maureen D. Mack
Eau Claire, WI

NO TO HILLARY   March 1st, 2008 12:04 pm ET

jON, YOU COULD HAVE ANYONE YOU WANT ON YOUR SHOW.
Why a liar.????? This guest will make you very unpopular. Can
you cancel or stay home sick in bed.

Barry   March 1st, 2008 12:04 pm ET

Stewart is gonna grill her on her supposed 35 years of experience… He's asked several guests before whether or not her time in the whitehouse should be considered part of that; he's obviously skeptical.

I'm sure we'll hear plenty of her insincere cackling laughs during the segment though.

P.Y.California   March 1st, 2008 12:04 pm ET

I really love Obama supporters on this pages.
"I want an HONEST POLITICIAN in the White house"
Is not an HONEST POLITICIAN an OXYMORON ???

Audrey in CA   March 1st, 2008 12:03 pm ET

Oh, I know! This is to give her concession speech, right??

Bob   March 1st, 2008 12:03 pm ET

Beyond the shameless pandering of Hilary's past, (making a flag burning a federal crime, promotion of the patriot act, etc,) her acrimonious nature makes here unfit to be in any managerial position, certainly president. That her campaign has been so utterly outflanked and outwitted by Obama's serves testimony to her abysmal ability to lead. Following the faux patriotism predominant at the time of the Iraq vote not only demonstrated her lack of judgment, but reinforces her lake of managerial skill. Finally, Hillary as a democratic nominee will make McCain president.

Barry   March 1st, 2008 12:03 pm ET

Elle: Really? last 11 primaries say otherwise.

decider1136-Texas   March 1st, 2008 12:02 pm ET

If Texas goes to Obama, I think the McCain camp stands a very good chance of getting in. Say hello to your new President Mr McCain who got a zero rating from Sierra Club on his environmental record……….

Hillary supporters, Im all for an Independent ticket with HRC. I wont readjust my vote to Obama.

midora   March 1st, 2008 12:01 pm ET

I think Obama should cry to make fun of Hillary. "Please vote for me, cuz I'm such a sensitive guy, and my feelings would be so hurt if I lost….waaah waaah waaah".

ml   March 1st, 2008 12:01 pm ET

Obama made many mistakes, and still does, but it seems that it does not matter. Hillary made mistakes, but she is being hit hard for them. We are only human beings, all of us. NO one is perfect. Hillary is just more stable, i feel secure with her, not with Obama -he is constantly changing his stories, opinions. The one which really did it : he denounced Hillary video ( the 3 am one, but immediately he made a copy of it with his ending versiong. How smart – and original was this? Well, i do understand then that he denounced himself.
And it is good Hillary talks to people. Why not? Each of candidates does.

Raine   March 1st, 2008 12:01 pm ET

When I see Hillary only one word comes to mind, desperation. I hope and pray that Obama wins all of the primaries on March 4th or at least 3 of them. And to that person who said if you took away Obama's speeches what has he got?? Well, obviously you haven't checked on him so you don't know anything about him except what Hillary has been feeding you all which mostly were lies! Now If you'll actually bothered to look at his site you'll know he has done more for America than simply give inspiring speeches!

In any case, go Obama! Keep the faith people! Nobody said change is going to be easy so we should never give up. Keep calling!

katie   March 1st, 2008 12:00 pm ET

Jon, ask Hillary is she has to return the $30 Million of money in
donations she has received or will she get to pocket the money
after she loses.

OBAMA POWELL 2008

Bill, Tx   March 1st, 2008 12:00 pm ET

Maybe she'll do something different (again) like wear a dress?

Ed K.   March 1st, 2008 12:00 pm ET

Mary,
You hit the nail on the head. Also the reason Obama is getting the good treatment by the media is for one reason and that is so the republicans can win by a landslide in the general election. The rich / republicans own the media and can't afford Hillary as president so they are taking her out early. After Hillary is gone they will start bashing Obama, so he will fall from grace and McCain will became America's little darling, the Obama fans want know what hit them. Currently the Military Industrial Complex is running our country with our V.P. pulling the strings. Bush is just set out front playing president while the rich make a killing off the war. When people tell you the war is not going as planned by the Bush gang you should realize it is really going just as planned. They are making billions every day and they will do just about anything to keep this money coming in. I would love to see Hillary get the nod but it looks like the republicans have duped us again. Obama will be staked out for the kill in the general election and we will have 4 more years of republican rule and blood sucking. I had HOPE this Obama spin would ware off our young people and our Black community but it only gets worse. Obama is White when he needs to be and then Black at the tlip of a hat. He is not the second coming of nobody but how do mature Democrats get this across to these Obama fans? It's like a game to them and they don't seem to know this is real life and we as a nation are interviewing candidates for the hardest job in the world and we must look at things like experience, not how cool a guy is. We can only pray they come to their senses in Texas, Ohio, Penn and the remaining states so we can put Hillary in the office she has worked so hard for. This women is the real deal and it's shame on us if she is not our next president. Obama will be around for the next 8 years and if he proves himself he could take the next 8 years. Just think, no republican rule for 16 years!!!

Audrey in CA   March 1st, 2008 12:00 pm ET

@ Theresa,
I did research and I support Barack Obama.
And my research was careful.
And I can spell.

Hillary supporters – even if your candidate wins by 20% in all four states on Tuesday, which I don't think you expect even in your dreams, you still have a long and difficult road to the nomination. (I've done research here, too, and my math is even better than my spelling.)

I do like Jon Stewart though…

OBAMA 08!!

Bev   March 1st, 2008 12:00 pm ET

On is she going to tell us all how experienced she is and how Obama isn't experienced enough and how is was absent. Perhaps she should have been asent instead of voting for the war. She didn;t do her homework before making that vote or she wouldn't have voted as she did. Obama did his homework.

I worked on several staffing panels and because of union agreements we sometimes had to hire/promote the person with the most seniority and experience or because they were members of a targeted equity group and who met the minimum qualifications over another with less seniority and experience and who was actually better qualified, the better candidate for the job. Not to put Unions or Union agreements or employment equity down. They are needed but sometimes we got a so so person instead of an exceptional person in the position. Sometimes we got mediocracy. Experience and seniority alone are no guarantee that the person is the best one for the job.

19 year old -- first time voter   March 1st, 2008 12:00 pm ET

To Andrea Fuentes:

I live in TX, and I can tell you……….democrats will not vote for OBAMA!!!!!!
My roommates and I are already turning the TV off everytime we see SAINT OBAMA…..As a young woman who loves JOHN Stewart…I hope he will at least more fair to Sen. Clinton….

There was a previous post "former democrat", I'm going to start looking into that as well, I will change to Independent. I would rather vote for Mccain than Obama and his lovely "finally proud of america" wife BO……..

I hope John Stewart will not be drinking the Obama kool-aid

Thanks

Jonathan, Providence, RI   March 1st, 2008 12:00 pm ET

The headline of this article is yet another example of the endless parade of defamatory portrayals of Senator Clinton by the press. The article is positive, but the headline 'Clinton to take on John Stewart' implies that they are in some sort of fight. Just reading the headline might make one think that Clinton is embroiled in a back-and-forth conflict with the comedian, when in fact the exact opposite is true! So good job CNN, keep pushing for Obama, no matter how obvious your bias has become! Thanks for betraying the nation by painting Clinton, who is by far the most qualified and competent candidate on EITHER side, as a vindictive back-stabber. I'm just glad she's been strong enough to stand up to you and your defamation and favoritism for 20 years even as she keeps fighting to improve the lives of Americans.

Tara F. - TX   March 1st, 2008 11:59 am ET

I cannot believe the number of Obama supporters who are falling for Barack Obama's tired "judgement on the war" stance.

NEWSFLASH: He WAS NOT in the Senate and COULD NOT VOTE one way or the other … duh. It's easy to say what you would or would not have done when you weren't even in a position to vote … it's kind of like Monday Morning Quarterbacking.

That seems to be Mr. Obama's standard defense to any and every question posed to him. It's an old and tired response. It's not about a "past vote", but who has the best plan to deal with the state of our country at present … ECONOMY, HEALTH INSURANCE and, of course, getting out of IRAQ, safely.

I just hope people realize hope, change and "I didn't vote for a war that I wasn't in a position to HAVE to vote", aren't going to solve our post Bush problems.

This is not American Idol for crying out loud, it's the leader of the free world we're electing. After much thought and studying the issues, I would do myself and my country a huge disservice if I were to vote for anyone other than Senator Hillary Clinton.

Angie, Seattle WA   March 1st, 2008 11:58 am ET

I like Stewart's show… and I like Hillary a lot! Looking forward to seeing it. Thanks for the reminder!

Lester   March 1st, 2008 11:58 am ET

Oct. 2004: "One of Clinton's laws of politics is, if one candidate is trying to scare you, and the other one is trying to make you think, if one candidate's appealing to your fears, and the other one's appealing to your hopes. You better vote for the person who wants you to think and hope." William J. Clinton

Independent for Obama   March 1st, 2008 11:58 am ET

1. Hillary Clinton voted for the war ONLY BECAUSE the majority of america was in support of it. A PURELY POLITICAL REASON FOR THE VOTE. She didn't read any of the reports, but instead relied on the LYERS who wrote them. SHE FAILED AMERICA BY VOTING FOR THIS UGLY DISASTROUS WAR.

2. Barack Obama, on the other hand, WAS ADVISED by his campaign not to oppose the war, because most of the country at that time was for the war. THIS IS CALLED MORAL COURAGE. Something Hillary Clinton cannot ever claim to have.

john   March 1st, 2008 11:58 am ET

CNN THE CLINTON NEWS NETWORK ONLY ALLOWS HILLARY POSTS AT THIS TIME IN THE MORNING….

IVE NOTICED THIS FOR AWHILE NOW, BUT EVERY MORNING, SOMEONE WHO IS MODERATING THE BLOGS HERE OBVIOUSLY HAS A PRO-CLINTON PRO-NAFTA PRO-CORPORATE STANCE AND DOESNT LIKE THE FACT THAT OBAMA IS FOR CHANGE …

HILLARY IS GOING DOWN IN TEXAS AND OHIO….SHE WONT WIN BY THE LARGE MARGINS SHE NEEDS NO MATTER WHAT…BARACK HAS DESTROYED HER OVER AND OVER AND SHE HAS NEVER WON BY ALOT IN ANY STATE…ONLY BY A FEW POINTS…BUT BARACK HAS WON BY DOUBLE DIGITS OVER AND OVER AGAIN…THAT SAYS SOMETHING….

Why   March 1st, 2008 11:57 am ET

Why are all you women stating that Hillary should be President and Obama Vice. It will never happen because of Bill. No one wants to take orders from Bill and Hillary. Obama will NEVER be Vice to Hillary. So, forget about it.

Mike   March 1st, 2008 11:57 am ET

It is comments like "Barack and Roll" that indicates the poor political and educational understanding that Obama supporters have. Obamas supportes simply see a hip, smooth-talking, VH! icon, Obama is simply a lot of empty words (and even the empty words aren't his own.)

If we are relying on the college vote to guide our political future, we are in serious trouble. I respect anyone who opts for higher education, yet face it, college students lack the TRUE life experiences to understand the REAL political issues.

Hillary will be great on "The Daily Show," for she knows how to articulate.

Obama will have his concert in Ohio, after it's over he can do what he does best, plagiarize the groups lyrics and transform them into a speech.

Hillary 08!!

melania   March 1st, 2008 11:57 am ET

So… now that the Clintons are crying that she isn’t getting “fair coverage” …all we see is ads about her?

Have any of you that are screaming the "experience" card, actually ever even LOOKED at what he's done? Do any of you know that he has actually been in elective office longer than her? Clinton may have more experience in Washington than him… but there are many (even those in important political positions) that don't necessarily see that as a good thing. Sometimes it takes a fresh view. It's been happening that way in business for many, many years.

And it also doesn’t look like this “fear inducing” ad that she used will be working all that well, because low and behold… Barack is being endorsed by Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller… he praised Obama as: "the most qualified person – Democrat or Republican – to lead our country in the face of enormous challenges – the very real threat of terrorism, economic uncertainty, and instability at home and abroad." But it's only the young voters just throwing their blind trust at him? OK!!

On another note, I would just add that not all of Obama's voters are "young" OR "delusional". I personally am an extremely well educated woman, am not "young", and am certainly not delusional. I also happen to know MANY other people from several different generations that support Obama and have done their own diligent research as well, which is what everyone should do… not just listen to what the candidate, or especially, what the media says!

Bean Counter, Motor City, MI   March 1st, 2008 11:57 am ET

I wonder if John will float her a bunch of softballs like he did B.H. Obama.

emmy   March 1st, 2008 11:56 am ET

Hillary i am your no.1 fan and after you do the Jon Stewart show..go over to do the Colbert Report he is just great..i laugh so hard when i watch him my stomach hurts

TIME FOR CHANGE   March 1st, 2008 11:56 am ET

Tanya, Chicago: THOSE WERE A LOT OF WORDS JUST TO SAY " HILLARY 'O8.

I BELIEVE AS MANY AMERICAN DO HILLARY CHANGE BEGANS AT THE TOP. BREAKING THE CLINTO/BUSH STRANGEHOLD WILL INSPIRE AMERICAN TO SUPPORT THIER LEADER. OBAMA NEEDS A CHANCE JUST LIKE CLINTON AND BUSHS HAND THEIRS.

ONE THING IS FOR SURE…NO ONE PERSON CAN FIX THIS MESS IN FOUR YEARS.

I SUPPORT THE DEM NOMINEE WHOEVER IT IS… CAN YOU AND OTHER HILLARY SUPPORTERS SAY THE SAME???

Matt Meyer   March 1st, 2008 11:55 am ET

Am I the only oine out here who thinks John Stewart is goig to tear her apart? As a regular viewer of The Daily Show, I've seen John Stewart tear through plenty of politicians for their silly games. I can't want to hear him take her on regarding her fear-mongering. This will not be a happy appearance for Clinton. Did anyone see the episode after the last debate? John Stweart ragged on her for whining about having to answer questions first and overall stated that she was grabbing at straws. Direct quote from John Stewart after a clip of Obama responding to Hill's "reject vs. denounce" silliness:

"He's KILLING her."

Melanie   March 1st, 2008 11:54 am ET

I hope my TV will be set up by then, so I can watch! Honestly, its a good way for her to cry again! Fool me once, shame on you! Fool me twice, shame on me! It won't work Hillary, pack your bags and go home!

Sarah Smith   March 1st, 2008 11:54 am ET

where are the tax returns?

and WHO is Chelsea's dna father? she does not have one single resemblance to bill.

heliosmou   March 1st, 2008 11:53 am ET

I think what we will see is a woman who has a great sense of humor.

emmy   March 1st, 2008 11:53 am ET

so glad she will be on the Daily show..she is the best

Elle   March 1st, 2008 11:52 am ET

Soon to be president Hillary Clinton, to appear on 'The Daily Show.' She has huge, huge, huge support from US.

Andrea Fuentes, Miami FL   March 1st, 2008 11:52 am ET

Guys, I wish nationwide we Democrats would tone down the hatin' rhetoric. Any bashing or dirt brought up against either Obama or Hillary will probably come back to haunt us for November.

I happen to support Obama, but am not going around bashing Hillary on the internet. I kind of hope for a dream ticket with both of them… probably just dreaming as Hillary probably wouldn't accept VP.

I admire her strength, intelligence and convictions, but think Obama can unite people in a unique way that this country RED OR BLUE badly needs.

Look forward to The Daily Show; love Jon Stewart!

Jonathan   March 1st, 2008 11:51 am ET

Let's quickly remind ourselves this is politics and that means things are not ever going to be fair or truly clean. I mean look at Bush, he hustled his way into his first term and then used fear from 9/11 to get re-elected, this is a prime example of manipulating politics at its best.

I really like Hillary Clinton. She is a very intelligent woman and I can't deny part of her appeal is because I have fond memories of her husband's time in office, but i would prefer Obama in the White House as the President. He may not have the experience, but he has the judgment and a certain like-ability that will come in handy while negotiating deals that are in the best interest of Americans. It seems to me a great deal of people are petrified of real change.

I define one example of change as meeting with your enemies. Look at it this way. What parent tells their 8 year old child" when you go to school tomorrow, go right up to Timmy and knock the *%&4 out of him because he is mean and I hear he has the ability to hurt you because he has been doing push ups. There is no need to communicate with him because you are better than that. Use violence to solve your issues and you won't ever feel insecure, like your dad does when he hits me."

We are teaching our future generations there is no place for dialogue and violence is the way to solve issues and then you wonder what is happening to the youth of America and why there will be street gangs. They are just following the examples set by our government.

I define real change, for the good of ALL Americans as:

Barack Obama.

OBAMA 08

You are not Funny   March 1st, 2008 11:51 am ET

Love how you Hillary Clinton workers come to this site and post under many different names. You are not fooling anyone. It is a easy way for you to make your five dollars per hour. You are the same kind of people that voted for DUB-YA twice. Not this time.

Obama 08

Caryl   March 1st, 2008 11:51 am ET

I have always believed that your coverage was objective and honest up
until the political races . You have consistently anointed Mr. Obama
and because of your slanted perspective some Americans may become disenchanted because of your own inaccurate reporting. I have attended events for Senator Clinton and can tell you with complete accuracy that hundreds are turned away because only half of the gymnasiums are opened for these events. cnn pans their cameras on the "closed side" Falsely stating that crowds are slim when former president Clinton stumps for his wife. I live in a srongly populated republican county in Ohio. Mr. Clinton could have filled up our high school many times over. Shame on you CNN!

joe   March 1st, 2008 11:51 am ET

I AM A FLORIDIAN

IT WOULD BE A DIFFERENT STORY IF OUR VOTES IN FLORIDA

WERE COUNTED..

MANY HERE WILL VOTE FOR MCCAIN IF OBAMA IS THE NOMINEE

HILLARY 08!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Paul   March 1st, 2008 11:51 am ET

Hillary Clinton for president. I will watch the show!!!

Chris   March 1st, 2008 11:50 am ET

Dems crack me up sometimes. I read all these posts concerned whether Obama will be able withstand the "repugs dirty attacks", and how it pains them to see Hillary pull a page out of the Republican play book.

The Dems give lip service to being the party of choice and the party that stands up to disenfranchised voters.

However, what happened when Ralph Nader announced he was running for President? Dems couldn't toss the hate fast enough. I don't agree with Nader on much, but he is one thing that most politicans are not — sincere, and that says a lot about him.

These same Dems who believe in choice schemed to keep Nader off the ballot in as many states as possible in 2004, citing technicalities. Weren't they disenfranchising those who wanted the choice to vote for Ralph?

Hypocrites.

POPE in Boston   March 1st, 2008 11:50 am ET

The fact is Hillary and Obama's platforms are almost identical. Both candidates are backed by staffs who are intelligent, knowledgable and patriotic Americans. Both are itching to get to the White House to get this country on the right track again. And by extension, the world. Both are forces to be reckoned with. So then it comes down to nuance.

Obama does have a plan. And he does have experience. Just like Hillary. And just like McCain. And those who categorically say Obama has neither are just wrong. Plain and simple. Google Obama's Blueprint for Change online and read it. Go to his website and learn about him. There is substance behind the man and the rhetoric. And the fact that he is able to mobilize people the way he has in this campaign says something about what of President he will be when he is dealing with partisan issues here at home, as well as foreign relations around the world.

And please don't compare Obama to Bush. Bush rose to power because he is a Bush. He could've run on name recognition alone. Obama came from nothing. And the recognition he is getting right now is founded on his hardwork as a public servant for 20 years. No, he didn't come out of nowhere. So, please, if you want to have an intellectual and mature discussion about who is qualified for the job, don't throw around the "no experience, all rhetoric" line. Because the irony of that, is THAT is all rhetoric.

Discuss the issues and policies and discuss how each candidate affects the American populace they are going to govern. Right now, it's a fact that Hillary is polarizing people on a very superficial level, which is categorically wrong, but a fact nonetheless. Obama, on the other hand, is bringing new people into the process and is giving hope to those who feel they have been disenfranchised for the last 7 years. Much like Howard Dean did during his run. And despite Dean's ill-advised, seemingly un-presidential yell that was the harbinger of his campaign's downfall, he was qualified to be president. John Kerry was qualified to be president. Al Gore was qualified to be president. But there are reasons why none of them motivated enough people to get behind them. And the beauty behind Obama, as a leader, is that he can overcome those hurdles that rendered Dean, Kerry and Gore un-elected, as he is already proving to so in this campaign.

So imagine then what a man of substance, who is easily more intelligent, more reasonable, more accessible and more transparent in his politics than this current president or any run-of-the-mill American politician in recent history, can do as the Leader of the Free World in 2009 and beyond. Imagine the good he's already espousing and the good he can do for our country and the world.

Gary   March 1st, 2008 11:48 am ET

You dont listen to the news to close. Bill Clinton had experience about foreign policies when he was Gov. of Ar. You keep knocking the Clintons. Hillary is your only hope for real changes for the better.She also can defeat MCcain for office. Keep believing your God Obama,that can bring you rock bands ,smooth talk and alot promises he wont be delivering if he make office.You white males want regonition in the voting ,why ?most of you are bias against a woman president and follow the leader to the dreamer Obama.These young people of America will be crying later if Obama makes office and our country goes to hell.He calls himself Christain give me a break. Christains dont keep things from the country ,dont critisize others by threatning super delagates to join him or loose out on history.They sure dont promise everyone that they can change the world.Only one can do that its not your God Obama,its the real God.

seg   March 1st, 2008 11:48 am ET

i think Democrats are going to blow this election . . . AGAIN!

Barry   March 1st, 2008 11:47 am ET

OMG Obama is TRYING to buy young votes with his rock concert…

Wait what's Hillary doing on the Daily Show then?

Dugolo   March 1st, 2008 11:47 am ET

Hillary is a panderer. She has no principles. She'll do anything to be president.

Anyone remember in 2005 when she co-sponsored a bill with Sen. Robert Bennett, a Utah Republican to OUTLAW FLAG BURNING??? This was a veiled attempt to curry favor with the right wing. Even Antonin Scalia agrees that this is protected speech.

This is why people find her calculating.

"It's hard to see this as anything but pandering," New York Times editorial page.

Moira Armstrong   March 1st, 2008 11:47 am ET

Once again an article where CNN lets the bad comments pile up against Hillary: censoring out the good ones. They only lets so many good comments in and then they stop the comments thread. CNN: Communist News Network. This is the stuff they do in Russia and China.

Maria Christine V from Dallas TX   March 1st, 2008 11:46 am ET

Oh please! Obamabots claim they have been respectful toward Hillary in these post?

Now that's truly fairy tales and pixie dust!

anonymous, chicago, il   March 1st, 2008 11:46 am ET

So, why has Hillary not released her tax returns?

Why has she accused Obama of running a Karl Rove-style campaign and then thereafter releases her own fear-mongering ad?

Why after the candidates agreed not to seat Michigan and Florida delegates for not following election rules, is she now arguing that they should be seated?

Why is Hillary's campaign threatening to sue Texas for the way delegates are allocated in that state?

Why has Hillary delivered speeches supporting NAFTA and now she claims she never supported NAFTA?

Why is she coming across in the debates as a mean, petty, combative and very negative candidate?

Alex from IL   March 1st, 2008 11:46 am ET

A day late and a dollar short, I say. She should have shown up on the Daily show sometime in the past year.

Jack - Houston, TX   March 1st, 2008 11:45 am ET

I'm really worried that Obama won't be able to handle all the mess left by President Bush….

I don't really like Hillary, but I just find myself more comfortable with her handling the two most important things: the economy and foreign policy

decider1136-Texas   March 1st, 2008 11:45 am ET

Here is something else that this Obama leaning news station wont print. Im leaving the Democratic party. Im disgusted by the prejudice I hear and see. Demos are included in that.
The required convention here is causing havoc, most of us dont have an experienced chair and no one knows what to expect the night of the caucus. Tried to get help and got a really laid back half reply that didnt even begin to answer all the many questions for a process that is too darn complicated.
If the pastor from illinois is elected im voting independent.

Lynn, SC   March 1st, 2008 11:44 am ET

Senator Clinton is ready to serve from Day 1? We need her to answer the phone at 3 a.m.? She wasn't ready for Super Tuesday, nor was her campaign. Would the media please ask how we are to believe that she is ready to serve as president and she can't even run an effective campaign … Please!

bdc   March 1st, 2008 11:44 am ET

she doesn't have presidential experience, she hung out for 8 years. She didn't have a security clearance. She wasn't in on any important meetings.

HER EXPERIENCE IS A LIE. That's why she was wrong on Iraq, wrong on Iran, pays millions $$$$$ to consultants for her campaign, why her campaign message keeps changing. She doesn't know what she's doing.

Remember when she defended special interests in the CNN debate with Edwards….? Yeah, that changed quick b/c someone told her that was wrong, she didn't realize that…

Enough is Enough   March 1st, 2008 11:44 am ET

She'll do anything. But she can't stop the Movement.

Larry from LA   March 1st, 2008 11:44 am ET

Here' my comment. I can't stand Hillary's face anymore. Actually both faces. Now I understand how people who were once in love get divorced. In time the real personality comes out just like Billary. If there is a god in heaven please let anyome but Hillary be President.

Jane Curran   March 1st, 2008 11:44 am ET

Kudos for John Stewart for giving Hillary an opportunity to show her abilities and applied intelligence….not just great speeches. My goodness, I was a great speaker in college, but it doesn't make me a presidential candidate. She is the only candidate who knows enough about events in the world to deal with them effectively. Also, WOMEN, let's not forget that black men got the right to vote before women….and now it looks like some would prefer it if women kept their rightful place…you know, like "Iron my shirt" comment at one of her rallies. Women are coming together for her in these last days before March 4th. They do not want our rights eroded more than they are now. Go get 'em Hill!!

Rudy   March 1st, 2008 11:44 am ET

I'm going to vote Democratic regardless, but the Dems better settle this thing soon if they want any of my financial support. I gave generously in '04 and '06, but I'm not going to pay for them to fight one another.

Gail   March 1st, 2008 11:44 am ET

I ALSO HAVE BEEN A LIFE LONG DEM.

THE MEDIA AND THE ESTABLISHMENT DEMS HAVE LOST IT

I AM GOING TO VOTE FOR SOMEONE OTHER THAN THE MAN IF HILLARY GETS OUT….

I THINK YOU WILL BE SURPISED HOW MANY WOMAN WILL STAY HOME OR NOT VOTE AT ALL ..

I WILL BE THE FIRST TO HAVE HILLARY RUN AS AN INDEPENDENT

AFTER ALL ALL OF HER YEARS OF HARD WORK AND DEDICATION TO THE DEM. PARTY HASN'T PAYED OFF. MAYBE SHE NEEDS TO RETHINK HER POLITICAL PARTY AND RUN AS AN INDEPENDANT

GAIL

James M.   March 1st, 2008 11:44 am ET

Alice Rea, why don't you move to the USSR circa 1976? What does the religion of Obama's father have anything to do with the integrity of the man that is Barrack Obama? That's like saying, why doesn't anyone ask how can Hillary stay with her husband after he was impeached for being an adulterer?

MIchael   March 1st, 2008 11:43 am ET

Hillary is a very Intelligent person, We do not want the Obamas in the white house. Did you see when Michelle Obama started swinging her arms like she was ready to breakdance when she found out Hillary lost a few weeks ago.. The Obamas are definetely Presidential material.. If they win the White house will be called ( MY CRIB )

Rikki, S. Africa   March 1st, 2008 11:43 am ET

Hillary you are the BEST !!!!!!

Monk Babu   March 1st, 2008 11:42 am ET

Obama complained that McCain and Bush drove the bus into the ditch and that there are only so many ways to bring it out! Great comment! Obama argued that you need judgment and not experience for a president. Bush had the right judgment to invade Iraq but no experience to dealing with the after effects of the initial invasion. People like Collin Powell had great experience in warning the President to be careful about the after effects of the initial invasion. Unfortunately President did not have the right judgment (or was too arrogant) to listen to people like Collin Powell.

What worries me is that Obama will dig a bigger hole when he tries to bring the troops back home, and later (as he pointed out) that he will go back when terrorists camp in Iraq. Imagine the scenario, at that point when he wants to take out the terrorist he will start negotiating Syria and Iran. Obama is not a fighter, he will bend his back to please Iran and Syria. Create a bigger mess and drive many more buses in to bigger ditches…

What you need is experience to make the right judgments at the right time based on what information you have in hand. Clinton made the right judgment to vote for the War based on the information that was available. Obama has hardly made tough choices. He quoted Terri Shivo (spell?) case as his toughest choice in his Senate! Wow, and even then he had no guts to stand up for it! Terri Shivo is one life, but the choices he has to make when dealing with Iraq and other places is many many lives.

Believe me, he wants to capitalize on his race and background, but is not willing to get vetted when some of his other background is brought forward!

Ronald, American living abroad   March 1st, 2008 11:42 am ET

Hillary does better when she doesn't speak . . . maybe she will do a mime act . . . or just run her fingernails along a blackboard. That will definately inspire her supporters.

angelita   March 1st, 2008 11:42 am ET

Obamamaniacs read the following that I took out of an article written by someone regarding Sen. Obama and the war.

THE WAR IN IRAQ

Let’s start with his signature position against the Iraq war. Obama has sent mixed messages at best.

First, he opposed the war in Iraq while in the Illinois state legislature. Once he was running for US Senate though, when public opinion and support for the war was at its highest, he was quoted in the July 27, 2004 Chicago Tribune as saying, “There’s not that much difference between my position and George Bush’s position at this stage. The difference, in my mind, is who’s in a position to execute.” The Tribune went on to say that Obama, “now believes US forces must remain to stabilize the war-ravaged nation – a policy not dissimilar to the current approach of the Bush administration.”

Obama’s campaign says he was referring to the ongoing occupation and how best to stabilize the region. But why wouldn’t he have taken the opportunity to urge withdrawal if he truly opposed the war? Was he trying to signal to conservative voters that he would subjugate his anti-war position if elected to the US Senate and perhaps support a lengthy occupation? Well as it turns out, he’s done just that.

Since taking office in January 2005 he has voted to approve every war appropriation the Republicans have put forward, totaling over $300 billion. He also voted to confirm Condoleezza Rice as Secretary of State despite her complicity in the Bush Administration’s various false justifications for going to war in Iraq. Why would he vote to make one of the architects of “Operation Iraqi Liberation” the head of US foreign policy? Curiously, he lacked the courage of 13 of his colleagues who voted against her confirmation.

And though he often cites his background as a civil rights lawyer, Obama voted to reauthorize the Patriot Act in July 2005, easily the worse attack on civil liberties in the last half-century. It allows for wholesale eavesdropping on American citizens under the guise of anti-terrorism efforts.

And in March 2006, Obama went out of his way to travel to Connecticut to campaign for Senator Joseph Lieberman who faced a tough challenge by anti-war candidate Ned Lamont. At a Democratic Party dinner attended by Lamont, Obama called Lieberman “his mentor” and urged those in attendance to vote and give financial contributions to him. This is the same Lieberman who Alexander Cockburn called “Bush’s closest Democratic ally on the Iraq War.” Why would Obama have done that if he was truly against the war?

Recently, with anti-war sentiment on the rise, Obama declared he will get our combat troops out of Iraq in 2009. But Obama isn’t actually saying he wants to get all of our troops out of Iraq. At a September 2007 debate before the New Hampshire primary, moderated by Tim Russert, Obama refused to commit to getting our troops out of Iraq by January 2013 and, on the campaign trail, he has repeatedly stated his desire to add 100,000 combat troops to the military.

At the same event, Obama committed to keeping enough soldiers in Iraq to “carry out our counter-terrorism activities there” which includes “striking at al Qaeda in Iraq.” What he didn’t say is this continued warfare will require an estimated 60,000 troops to remain in Iraq according to a May 2006 report prepared by the Center for American Progress. Moreover, it appears he intends to “redeploy” the troops he takes out of the unpopular war in Iraq and send them to Afghanistan. So it appears that under Obama’s plan the US will remain heavily engaged in war.

decider1136   March 1st, 2008 11:42 am ET

OK Clinton supporters, here is something to note.
All I did was question Obama, I dont even have a real criticism of him, except his lack of experience, but my comments are repeatedly refused by this Obama leaning news station. If it happened to me I bet it is happening to a lot of people.
No, I didnt even call anyone names, which is what Im seeing a lot of people here doing to Hillary. Does anyone question the bias of the news media?

someone smiling in Texas   March 1st, 2008 11:41 am ET

Obama is sure full of surprises, middle name, terrorist friends, voting threats, corrupt money for his campaign, photo of non-american attire and last but not least unable to answer a simple question are you liberal? I know where were getting, what Martin Luther King did for this country changed the lives of many people and mostly African-American People because he had a dream and now Obama is forcefully trying to do the same in forcing African-American people to vote for him for what? so that tomorrow he can say he was the only Black man to be president of the United States even if he doesn't know what the most important job in the world is all about. People dont be fooled, he's not your Sunday preacher and the only reason I say this is because I've seen some of his rallies on TV and many people behind him say Amen after he finishes a sentence or counter attack on Hillary or McCain. I know African-American would like to make history………look a Bush now……..and me being a Latino would like a Mexican-American to be president as well, but just because I want that doesn't mean I will vote for Pepe or Pedro because he's Latin or Mexican…….I would Clearly vote for the most prepared person and in this case is Hillary.

Very Eloquent   March 1st, 2008 11:41 am ET

Tanya, your post goes right to the nitty gritty of issues our country is in now and the next President is going to face. I couldn't agree with you more. I fear if Senator Clinton is not the nominee for the democratic party, expect another 4 years of Republican leadership in the Whitehouse. Lifelong democrats who are the base of the party are WILLING to throw this election away to the GOP if Hillary is not the nominee for their party. Can I blame the base of the party for doing so? NO. These people who support their party are REALISTIC, they're not easily swayed by poetic words that can easily seduced the young and naive.

I'm a libertarian, my man is Ron Paul, but I would be happy to vote for Senator Clinton if she's the nominee for the Democratic Party come November election.

Normal Joe   March 1st, 2008 11:41 am ET

Who cares what she has to say anymore?

BO08

Gail   March 1st, 2008 11:41 am ET

I also have been a life long DEMOCRAT

Gail   March 1st, 2008 11:40 am ET

I also have been a life long Democrat ! And I love Hillary however the media and the leaders of the democratic ESTABLISHMENT

kathleen   March 1st, 2008 11:40 am ET

We don't care about Hillary making an appearance on
Jon Stewart. I used to like Jon. Hillary is deceitful and
will say anything to win for money, power and prestige.
Actually, Jon is just giving her free publicity here.

OBAMA-POWELL 2008

OBAMA-POWELL 2008

OBAMA POWELL 2008

JJ in NY   March 1st, 2008 11:39 am ET

Enough of these phony and scripted appearences for Billary. How about releasing your tax returns and the Clinton library records that document her schedule and agenda as first lady. It would definitely show that she ain't no lady .

M Uddin   March 1st, 2008 11:39 am ET

I don't think it is going to change the reality that she is the agent of lobbing and special interest. She has accepted so much money from them that she can't bring real change for common people. I would like to hear exactly what is her experience of 35 years. I only know that she gave George Bush the blank check to go to war to Iraq and Iran. I want to hear from her what exactly she is going to do as a President and how she is going to funds those programs. I want to hear details as she is demanding from Senator Obama.

Erik   March 1st, 2008 11:39 am ET

Being First Lady does not qualify anyone to be President. On the "experience" front, Senator Obama has been an elected official since 1996, longer than Senator Clinton has considerign she was first elected in 2000. Her recent fear-mongering television ad is appalling. She is clearly running scared and depending on Karl Rove tactics.

Tony   March 1st, 2008 11:38 am ET

Good. Don't need another show with Obama dancing. Twice on Ellen was enough. But I guess he has alot of time to work on his dance moves since he's often "missing in action." He's been the chair of a critical committee that's supposed to oversee NATO in the war in Afghanistan for over a year. Hasn't held one meeting. He also failed to show up for a key vote on the Iranian Revolutionary Guard to help the troops in Iraq. Too busy campaigning. He didn't even bother to show up at last week's Black Forum in New Orleans. Hillary attended. That's Obama for you. A man who likes to vote present but rarely IS present.
Go Hillary!

Beverly   March 1st, 2008 11:38 am ET

Thanks for giving equal time to all the candidates.
I will be watching. Go Hillary! I voted for you.

maynard   March 1st, 2008 11:38 am ET

hillary will all gods wisdom is washed up it didnt help with good old billy boy comes on the scene and shots off his mouth.

hillary is from the old school and omama is from the new school. its time for change so hillary and the folks that think she is the greatest
better take some deep looks inside and see who they want to run this country

remember eight years of ther clintons is ENOUGH

reader-of-many-sources   March 1st, 2008 11:38 am ET

Looking forward to your fake laughter, Hillary. I'd rather nominate Jon Stewart for President.

pupnannie   March 1st, 2008 11:37 am ET

One thing for sure, if obama gets the nomination, heaven forbid, we can quit worrying about him being President, because the Republicans will tear him to shreds. I'm sure they are very busy gathering information about him for their national campaign. John McCain says he will not run a negative campaign, he won't have to, they will do it for him. Swift boat will look like kindergarden stuff compared to what they will do to obama and he will deserve it. The media has had their darling obama for the primaries and if he wins the nomination it will be because of them. I have never seen such bias in my life. Reporters are suppose to report the facts and you should never know who they are backing. Just like a referee in a ball game. I am sure they all have their pick of who they want to win but they certainly can't show it or they would be out of a job. I for one will never watch CNN again if obama wins the nomination as I will blame them. FOX has been much more fair to Hillary then CNN. The republicans say they want HIllary to be the nominee as they think they can beat her but they are using reverse psychology as they really want obama because they KNOW they an beat him. Why else would Dick Morris ask republicans in Texas to vote for obama. They don't want to go up against Hillary. Get smart Americans, vote for the most qualified, not the one that says change, as there can be change for the worse too. We had lots of change under bush and look where it got us. Wake up and cast your vote for Hillary Clinton.

Chris   March 1st, 2008 11:37 am ET

Google " Hillary Truth" and you will see Hillary's true colors.

Why should Obama be the VP when he is winning? It doesn't make sense. Plus based on how active they were on the Senate, Obama is a lot more experienced than Hillary.

As a President, Obama will fix the country. Hillary will run the country just like how she ran her campaign.

Think people.

from Boston   March 1st, 2008 11:36 am ET

I have read the blog and it is true, the Obama supporters are such hate mongers that they are irrational. They can be equated to the far right wing of the Republican party who have an attitude that it is my way or no way. Too bad many good candidates are not still in this race. Hillary is more informed and her answers during debates are concise, and thoughtful. She shows she has a grasp of domestic and foreign affairs. So what if she didn't succeed the first time trying to bring about health care reform (don't forget the Republicans didn't like the fact that she was a First Lady and Bill appointed her to head this up). I do believe that Obama's lack of experience is a very big factor and his stretching of the truth of his actual accomplishments are something to be questioned.

Many Clinton supporters will back McCain just on the experience factor and because he has demonstrated that he can work across the aisle.

Tony   March 1st, 2008 11:36 am ET

Good. Don't need another show with Obama dancing. Twice on Ellen was enough. But I guess he has alot of time to work on his dance moves since he's often "missing in action." He's been the chair of a critical committee that's supposed to oversee NATO in the war in Afghanistan for over a year. Hasn't held one meeting. He also failed to show up for a key vote on the Iranian Revolutionary Guard to help the troops in Iraq. Too busy campaigning. He didn't even bother to show up at last week's Black Forum in New Orleans. Hillary attended. That's Obama for you. A man who likes to vote present but rarely IS present.
Go Hillary!

a chair of a committe that's Hillary was right on the mark, when it came to judgement and following through, where was obama? He was voting for something he said he was against. obama is weak and again came out with an ad claiming his credentials are that he was against the war. But when it came to putting up, he shut up, this argument is old and boring and has no relevance. When has obama negotiated and was instrumental in resoluting peace, when has obama ever stood up for human rights in other countries, when has he held a sub-committee hearing that oversees Europe and Nato actions in Afghanistan? NEVER!

gerry   March 1st, 2008 11:36 am ET

Hillary's chatter abouit beinjg experienced is bare-faced dishonesty.

She spent many a night in the White House conjugal bedroom wondering who Bill might be consorting with that night.

That trauma,and the probability of the poor woman having flashbacks,is enough reason to prevent her from going back in there.

Too dangerous for us.

Rehab for Bioll, therapy for Hill.

Gerry
Pembroke Pines

Ann Marie   March 1st, 2008 11:34 am ET

Can't wait to see the show. I am sure she will get a fair shake on this show as opposed to mainstream media. This show seems to inform us more than mainstream media anyway.

Lee   March 1st, 2008 11:34 am ET

Hillary is the best.
Obama was trying so hard to get in all the shows, I saw him moving everywhere, using his "street smart", he said that's good communication… He thinks he can get into White House with these tricks… what a joke, American people aren't that stupid and blind.

PAUL   March 1st, 2008 11:33 am ET

THE TRUTH HURTS AND THAT IS WHY IT IS NOT BEING PRINTED.

JON STEWART,
aSK HILLARY WHY SHE DIDNT BUY "THE BEST POLITICAL TEAM ON TV" AND A SITUATION ROOM. IT SEEMS LIKE IT WAS OBAMA'S BEST BUY OF THE CAMPAIGN,

Dan   March 1st, 2008 11:33 am ET

Canadian news say their story about obama -NAFTA is true that he's playing politics trade agreement

Ralph Michael Garber   March 1st, 2008 11:32 am ET

H.Clinton & B. Obama are running and get coverage on CNN. What in the world is Billy doing – - he gets far more coverage (time) on your news coverage than Michelle. I still think you should register as a political machine for the Washington establishment – - there might be some added tax benefits for CNN.

The truth is, neither B. Clinton or M. Obama should get all the time on TV as the candidates. In order to give B the "voice" – - you have to do the same for M – - as capable as Michelle is, she is not the x-pres., and her words are not as notable to the critical population (undecides) as Bill. Yes he is experienced – - and experienced politician (as is H). Your measure of coverage becomes a travisity. Hopefully, others with recognize your bias, and listen to the candidates instead of the more experienced politicians. Mike

Jan E   March 1st, 2008 11:32 am ET

Please take a second to ask yourself this question and answer it honestly:

If Hillary was not the wife of a popular president, would she has risen to the status she has right now? Strictly on her own merits and not the fame of her husband, Do you think we would be talking about her now?? You and I know the answer to this one!!

If there is any similarity between a candidate and G.W. Bush, it is that she was propelled to the political seen because of her relation to a former president like Bush to his father!!

Christiane   March 1st, 2008 11:30 am ET

Hey Mrs. HRC, will you crying in the Daily Show? Then can everybody see , that you are a Actress.
Obama 08

Lisa Gross   March 1st, 2008 11:30 am ET

I love you Obama! Just a few more days and we will finally have our nominee to go up against Grandpa McCain. We need a fresh face and a new start for America! McCain and Clinton represent the past and everybody knows that if you live in the past you fail to grow! I feel that there is a bright future for the U.S.! OBAMA, OBAMA, OBAMA, take it to the polls!!!!! Texas, Ohio, Rhode Island, and Vermont vote to end the nomination process and help us get the republicans out of office and help heal America! God Bless Everyone!

Interesting   March 1st, 2008 11:29 am ET

It seems Clinton supporters can't remember history. Most presidents were never in washington because 90% were Governors. Bush Sr tried to use the experience argument on Bill Clinton. Here's what Bill said:

"The same old experience is not relevant. You can have the right kind of experience and the wrong kind of experience."

It's amazing that Obama hasn't thrown that back in their faces.

No to Hillary Clinton   March 1st, 2008 11:29 am ET

I do not have confidence that Hillary Clinton would make the right decision in the moment when it counts. With all of the information available to her about Iraq, she made a decision that was politically expedient. Rather than voting with her head, she voted to go along with the majority of members of the Senate. She did not have the courage to stand up to the truth. No to Hillary Clinton, he so-called experience did not help her make the right decision when it counted.

viv   March 1st, 2008 11:28 am ET

Everyone pay attention, Hilliary has not displayed in consistency in her campaign. you all keep knocking obama but I believe he can be the president. she talks about missing in action. I don't see her on the senate floor doing her job so who also missing in action. I think it is time to clean house. As far as obama and his hope and change. I see that you and everyone else is looking for hope and change and it is constantly being said in every who speaks. so apparently his words are not empty because you all want what he is offering. so think about it people. OBAMA 08 for PRESIDENT!!!!!

Basic Logic   March 1st, 2008 11:28 am ET

hmmmm … Landing a punch with a 16 ounce (Hillary) glove should be more devastating than one with a 6 ounce (Obama) glove … yet Obama keeps gaining.

I think you've accidently shown why Clinton is ineffective.

So sorry….

Don Fitzgerald, Chicago   March 1st, 2008 11:24 am ET

I have been a life long Democrat and it pains me to see Senator Clinton adopting a page out of the Republican play book. She should stop the fear-mongering and speak the truth about Senator Obama. Distortions and half truths are not rhetorical tools she should be employing. They are generally the favorite tools of the Republicans. That is why they are so worn out and meaningless. So, come on, Senator Clinton, you are better tnan that, stop with fear-mongering and speak to the high ideals our Party champions, as Senator Obama is doing!!!
SUPPORT OUR TROOPS, BRING THEM HOME, ALIVE. NOW.

Janet   March 1st, 2008 11:24 am ET

This is a very bad idea for her. Unless she has pre-screened all of the questions, she will fail miserably. She has a terrible personality and lies through her teeth. She lies so much that she can not keep up with her lies. Well if she lies in her upcoming trial in California, that is perjury and she will go to jail this time.

Mark   March 1st, 2008 11:23 am ET

I am so sick and tired of hearing the same old "experience" mantra. What matters is judgement and character. Hillary loses on both accounts. She has blatantly participated in say-anything-to-win tactics. She is too power-hungry to see what's good for this country. 35 years of change?? What did she do at the age of 25 that *really* made a difference for this country?

lame.

Barack and Roll, baby!

dee   March 1st, 2008 11:23 am ET

It is so easy to be INDEPENDENT…choose the best of 3…and I chose OBAMA….

Randy   March 1st, 2008 11:22 am ET

Well it looks like to me all you Clinton haters are coming out of the wood work but I don't think anybody heard a peep out of you losers when Bill was in office and everybody had a job and was eating good and living the good life, just hope if the muslin Obama gets in which I don't think he will he might not make the four years, so keep on hating the Clinton's it's good to get it off your chest and don't waste your vote on Obama

Charlotte   March 1st, 2008 11:19 am ET

I quit watching Oprah way back, when became so black. A school in Africa when schools in Chicago needed and still need people like her. Oh wait she said, American kids are spoiled brats.

Juanita   March 1st, 2008 11:18 am ET

We're agreed, it's "Jon Stewart" not "John Stuart". I haven't seen the "John Stuart Show" but I thoroughly enjoy the "Jon Stewart Show". I'd really like her to appear on the Colbert Nation. That would be fun.

pd4hillary   March 1st, 2008 11:18 am ET

Anonymous and Dave are absolutely right!! Obama supporters if you really want to see him become President, push for VP now and President in 8 years. Clinton supporters are more centrist and will slide to the moderate candidate that the Republicans are putting forward. The Rep will beat Dems in Nov because the Dems, despite all the false and hyped rhetoric about Obama's draw of independents, Obama's predominant support is from the left in the party. In other words, Dems are fielding a less centrist candidate. McCain will pick up the middle 5-10% and that is all that is needed. Plus, you have to look at the states that are swing states, Ohio, Florida, Penn, so on, Obama will not be as competitive there as Clinton, just look at the matchups. Throw into the fact that Florida has been completely disenfranchised by the Dems, especially if Obama is given the nomination without Floridians having a say, the Nov election is already lost. The idea that winning in a Republican state during a Dem primary translates into a Nov win, does not hold water. Look at the swing states!!

Judy   March 1st, 2008 11:17 am ET

Hillary is the most qualified to run for the President of the United States. But, because she is a woman, she must be tougher and then she must be softer, and then she must be prettier, etc. When will we ever elect a woman president, if not now.
Think about it. If Senator Obama, with the same resume, wit and charm were a woman, would we listen???

dave   March 1st, 2008 11:17 am ET

obama,08,o hell
hillary 08 o really

PAUL   March 1st, 2008 11:15 am ET

HEY JON STEWART,

ASK HILLARY IF SHE KNOWS HOW MUCH OBAMA PAID FOR A "THE BEST POLITICAL TEAM ON TV" AND A SITUATION ROOM. THAT IS WHERE SHE SHOULD HAVE SPENT HER MONEY. BECAUSE THESE 2 BUYS HAVE HELPED HIM TREMENDOUSLY.

from Boston   March 1st, 2008 11:15 am ET

Obama was not in Congress at the time so he should stop pretending that he actually had a vote about the war.

kate   March 1st, 2008 11:15 am ET

Sorry, but if that phone does ring at 3 a.m. and the country is in trouble, I want Hillary there. There is not enough time for Obama to site and chat with foreign leaders as he wants to do. Obama has great ideas but in reality, he cannot carry them out. Not enough experioence from Obama for me to put in in the Oval Office.

Jess   March 1st, 2008 11:15 am ET

I'm hesitant to support a leader whose followers are so hateful. When you hate someone so much, and idolize another so obsessively, it usually means you are lacking strength and confidence within yourself. I am looking forward to Hillary in 08.

usa, maryland   March 1st, 2008 11:14 am ET

1-Talking about Hillary: 35yrs of experience; how does this benefit the country when those experiences can not give her the basic wisdom she needs to make sound judgements and run the country. talking about being ready day one; how about getting it right day one? All these yrs should have sharpened the sense of judgement and helped make sound decisions. Got to be realistic here. 35yrs, great but it all sounds like a bragging thing that only "benefits" one person, not the country. sound judgement is the measure; and it appears Obama has it despite his relatively short life in politics. you are right, no room for trial and error and that's why you should vote for Obama.`

decider1136   March 1st, 2008 11:14 am ET

I agree that the last video was poor. It was not a good choice, but remember that a candidate's campaign is run by a lot of people, not just the candidate. It could be easy to view that thing and not really realize at that moment that the video wasnt the right message. Still that shouldnt overshadow the whole campaign.

Leah   March 1st, 2008 11:14 am ET

can't wait to see you, hillary.
hillary 08!

Laylah   March 1st, 2008 11:12 am ET

I hate to use the right -or left- wing conspiracy theory, but what is Jon Stewart doing by having his personal choice of presidential candidate on his show 8 hours before the polls open? Besides ratings, that is. There will be more to this encounter than meets the eye, beyond just crying. Billary is looking for an election day headline. She loves to create controversial news coverage.
Does this mean that now Oprah will have Obama live on her show on Monday, too. Beware, Billary, her ratings are a lot higher than Jon Stewart's, with a largely 30-70 year old, female audience.

Bob   March 1st, 2008 11:12 am ET

She is someone who use the country for their political gains…..

Say no to Clinton dynasty……

maxine   March 1st, 2008 11:12 am ET

Don't tell me Hillary isn't getting media attention. CNN has had more articles about her than any another. Also, Tanya in Chicago is posted on every Hillary article today. How much power do the Clintons really have; can't talk about Chelse, can't talk about Hillary's voting history, can't talk about the Clinton past–Google Clinton Convicts, can't talk about NAFTA and above all we can't press Hillary for her tax records and her WH records…..HMMMM Media doesn't like Hillary doesn't make a case for me..Fox news loves her, they are constantly defending her over Obama….so people chill. Hill and Bill will get into the WH again….and nothing will change…she doesn't play well with others. :) Live and learn.

Mary Smairat   March 1st, 2008 11:12 am ET

This is another "play" on the American people, apparently people in politics undermine the intelligence that we posses. I refuse to believe that Lewis had a change of heart and jumped over into the obama campaign because he truly believed it was the right thing to do… THIS IS POLITICS MY FRIENDS! Unfortunaltely the American people are not taking the time to peel back the outer layer of propoganda that the media is presenting. It is a shame that in today's world, we are letting the media companies control and determine what information in important for us to see. I refuse to believe that this country is that corrupt… the only hope that I have left is in Hillary Clinton. She just might be the last patriotic American left in this country. If this were a job interview… I hope those obama supporters are ok with not getting the job of their dreams because of dirty politics… if this were the "real world", the person with the most experience and credibility would get the job based on merit. For those of you who are working… this should make perfect sense to you.. for those who dont see it this way… well when you dont get success in life you will feel the injustice.

obma is not who he says he is, nor does he have the merit to be given this position. There is alot of information that we are not seeing… doesnt that trouble you? For example, if someone were to tell a rumor about you and you were hurt by it, yet there was NO way for anyone to see the truth, wouldnt that be upsetting to you? Wouldnt that be injustice to you? Look at it that way… when we see the Hillary bashing continue… dont you stop and think that there is somthing sketchy about how THE MEDIA IS PORTRAYING OBAMA LIKE THE NEWEST CELEBRITY IN TOWN!". I love rap music… but I do not want a president who listens to Jay-Z "I got 99 problems but a bi*ch aint one" (he played this song when he came out for a speech). Do you want a president with his own sneaker out (he has a new air force one on the market).

Unfortunately, if Hillary Clinton is not the candidate for president I WILL NOT VOTE IN NOVEMBER… this does not make me less of a democrat (as if that matters… hello we live in a FREE country). I refuse to buy into the propoganda and dirty politics of the Republican party. See, they must be really nervous about the country's sentiment with the Republicans productivity with the Bush administration. What better to put all of their energy and money into obama… at the worst they would have either mc cain or another puppet in office.. obama. There is alot of sketchy business going on.. too bad the media wont play fair.

Frank   March 1st, 2008 11:11 am ET

I CAN NOT HELP BUT WONDER IF HILLARY IS MISSING THE GOOD OLD DAYS WHEN THE PEOPLES HOUSE WAS AVAILABLE FOR RENT?

PERHAPS HILLARY HAS A NEED LIKE BILLY BOY TO BE ABLE TO PARDON ONE OR TWO POLITICAL CRIMINALS THAT THE CLINTONS HAVE BENEFITED FROM?

I NOT THINK THAT THIS COUNTRY CAN GO BACK TO TIME IN OUR HISTORY, HILLARY & BILLY BOY ARE THE PAST.

OBAMA REPRESENTS A UNITED COUNTRY OF WE THE PEOPLE.

Eli, Bay Area CA   March 1st, 2008 11:10 am ET

Here's the bottom line of the General Election. Clinton supporters, YOU should READ this

Isn't TWENTY EIGHT (28) years of Bush I, Clinton I, then Bush I I ENOUGH????????????????

Liam   March 1st, 2008 11:10 am ET

Hillery Clinton's resume, In a Nutshell.

I married a man who became a State Governor, and then the President of the USA.

Everything that he did that worked, was because of my help.

Everything that failed, was because I had nothing to do with them.

When you marry the right person, you get to jump to the head of the line, instead of having to work your way to the top, on your own merits, while all the while screaming Experience, Experience, Experience.

Jericho   March 1st, 2008 11:09 am ET

You would think that if Hillary was so smart, that she would learn, from EXPERIENCE, that her husband is a unfaithful, rapist, and womanizer. But she knows without him, she can't become president.

She didn't run for president 4 years ago because Karl Rove would have stop at nothing to destroy her. This year, no Karl Rove, no Bush. Only her good buddy McCain – who will play nice with her.

To ALL OBAMA SUPPORTERS   March 1st, 2008 11:09 am ET

And noone knows about Obama's chief financial aid being apart of a bank who ruined peoples lives by giving low income people loans with hidden fee's and high interest rates, knowing they couldn't pay. This has been documented.
And noone knows about Obama's ties with special interest groups, Lobbyists and PAC's. During his 2007/2008 Presidential campaign, he has taken money from medical/pharmasutical groups, and then lies straight to our faces saying he hasn't.
Obama criticized Edwards for receiving money from Unions backing him before Iowa, but now that a major Union has spent over $1m campaigning for Obama in Texas and Ohio, it's suddently ok.
And noone knows that Michelle Obama has visited a very rural poor community and told them to become school teachers and nurses because the corporate world just isn't for them.

*sighs* cmon CNN. This will prbly not get posted because it brings out horrible truths about Obama.

Obama only has momentum because these supposed college educated kids and near sighted adults only see the sparkly glitter in front of the camera, and not the solutions behind it.

Jenny   March 1st, 2008 11:08 am ET

What is wrong with Clinton supporters? We are all Americans, and we can vote for whomever we choose. All I hear are comments from Clinton supporters saying Obama supporters are somehow delusional or stupid. Is this how you and your candidate are supposed to unite the country?

I respect people that want to vote for Hillary. But I don't agree with them. Yes, she has SOME experience. But she's corrupt. She got bought out in the 90s when she tried to get us health care the first time. She's lucky Obama is enough of a politician to not pull out the vast amount of skeletons in her closet.

She has run a bad campaign. She won't release her tax returns. Everything is about her. She has done whatever she can to try to tear apart this party and scare them into voting for her.

STOP TRYING TO BELITTLE OBAMA SUPPORTERS. It makes you look worse than you can imagine. There's nothing wrong with us. We're intelligent people who have done our research and WE CHOOSE OBAMA. If it makes you feel better, then fine, go right ahead. Hillary has no problem denouncing anyone who doesn't support her.

OBAMA 08

Ron   March 1st, 2008 11:08 am ET

One other thing. Everyone is now trying to say Obama will not be able to survive the BIG BAD REPUBLICAN ATTACK!! Frankly a lot of you sound like cowards hiding from the playground bully!! I believe, not only will he handle it, if they get out of hand he is smart enough and calm enough to use it against them. You all seem to forget, you've got to be pretty smart to take on the Clintons and win!!!

C Lee   March 1st, 2008 11:08 am ET

Eight years is a long time but don't we all remember George Bush's first speech after becoming the president elect. Hope, unification, ending of bipartisanship etc were his words. If you need to refresh your memory, you can see it again on youtube. We all know what happened. He has become one of hte most devisive president in the history of this nation.

Saying is absolutely not the same as achieving. Americans should not make emotional decisions based on moving speeches.

Anonymous   March 1st, 2008 11:07 am ET

listen to the ads
clintons phone is ringing,ringing through the entire add
obamas phone only rings four times.
decide who do you want to pick up the phone at 3 am.

Independent Voter, TN   March 1st, 2008 11:07 am ET

I have a sense that McCain and the Republicans are just licking their lips waiting to see who the nominee is.

I think a moderate is going to appeal to the majority of Americans because of all the partisan BS that's been going on for the past 30 years. George Bush ran as a moderate, but unfortunately he fooled us all. Hillary has too much baggage and Obama seems to be nothing more than an empty suit who (it should be noted) was really going nowhere until Oprah endorsed him.

McCain is the only horse in the race who has proven to be bi-partisan in his dealings in Washington and has a record of accomplishment to run on.

I'll probably vote for the grownup.

Mickey in Oregon   March 1st, 2008 11:06 am ET

All I have seen so far in this campaign is that Obama is a good speaker, but I don't hear any ideas from him on what his stance is. He keeps harping on how he didn't vote for the Iraq war. But he doesn't mention he voted for the surge. He has talked about health care but essentially he has taken Clintons platform and twisted it around to sound like it was his idea all along. Doesn't he have anything else to speak about.

He has no agenda for foreign policy, economy, jobs, family, or inflation. He hasn't interacted with any foreign leaders and he hasn't convinced me on how he can make a change.

I think Clinton should have been more aggressive in their debates. But I think she was afraid that people would portray her as "picking on poor Obama."

Anonymous   March 1st, 2008 11:05 am ET

Regarding David's comments—You are right on. The best long term bet for the Democrats is a Hillary/Obama ticket. I strongly believe that McCain will easily win if Obama is the nominee. Counter to what Obama believes, Obama supporters would be more likely to support Hillary and it is unlkely that the majority of Hillary supporters would turn to Obama. In general, Obama has more than 90% of the African American vote and democrats leaning toward the left of the party. This block will never vote for a republican; however, Hillary's more moderate supporters would definitely find McCain's more moderate positions perfectly acceptable.
The Democrats should push for THE SIXTEEN YEAR PLAN! Hillary could lead us in the right direction for the next eight years, followed by a then seasoned Vice President Obama taking the presidency for the next eight years. At that time, Obama would be a very young 52 years old. Democrats should be working together for the long term benefit of the party. It would be great for them to come to this conclusion very soon and trample John McCain.

Laura   March 1st, 2008 11:05 am ET

I can't wait to see it. I miss nice HIllary, it will be nice to see her.

This campaign has not brought out her best qualities.
Whining about debate questions, beyond the grave Ann Richards endorsement, Michigan and Florida delegate votes, plagurism attacks, not able to control her emptions, she's all over the place.

Having just seen her new attack ad referring to the 3:00 am white house call, she has made it clear to me who I want in charge in a moment of crisis and It is not her.

Experience is useless if you don't learn from your mistakes, she has not learned anything except better campaign tricks via Rove.

rhurst   March 1st, 2008 11:05 am ET

CNN header Clinton to take on Stewart ,,,,please "take on" does anybody else think of a prise fight when they hear these words..You can be sure if it wasObama appearing CNN would wording would be "he graces the stage" . Everything you read from CNN and see on tv begins with Obama fires back,,,,,yes CNN this makes him seem so powerfull,,,,,go Hillary I cant wait to see you on Stewarts show

Trev   March 1st, 2008 11:04 am ET

I think it makes sense for her to go on the show. She needs to try and connect with younger voters. As for the timing, it makes sense to do it late because 18-30 year-olds make up their mind on who to vote for later.

BTW, it is fun to listen to the Obama supporters launch personal attacks on Hillary supporters. Great way to foster unity. Stick to talking about the candidates. I think Hillary supporters should do the same thing, but I find fewer examples of her supporters insulting Obama supporters. Speaking of sticking to the candidates, it is interesting that Obama responded to a "fear monger" ad with another "fear monger" ad. Doesn't sound like change to me.

Hillary 08 (without the hate)!

James   March 1st, 2008 11:04 am ET

Bill Clinton circa 1992 himself said it best:

If one candidate wants you to vote on your fears, and one wants you to vote on your hopes, choose hope.

rowland   March 1st, 2008 11:04 am ET

Experience is important but not everything. How much experience did Bill have before becoming President? The answer coming up after the break…………………………………..Welcome back….Bill Clinton had no experience. He was the govenor of Aransas….if that doesn't prepare you to run the most powerful country on the planet, I don't know what would!
Vote your conscience, vote for competence, stick to the issues people.

Chris   March 1st, 2008 11:04 am ET

tick tock…tick tock. Time's running out for you Hillary. Can't be soon enough. We've avoided the potential disasters of either an Edwards or Clinton Presidency, and that's a victory in and of itself, regardless of the eventual outcome of the general election.

I want to thank Senator Obama for sending Hillary packing. It's the greatest contribution he could make to the country.

Of course, I'm going to vote McCain come November.

me   March 1st, 2008 11:04 am ET

Clinton all the way! AMerica loves you!

no longer a democrat   March 1st, 2008 11:03 am ET

Hi,

I and my 5 family members changed our affiliations from Democrats to Independent yesterday. I am disgusted my the way the media has been sexist and potrayed everything as pro-Obama. The left extreme of the democratic party has taken over. Last night I saw that Quicny Jones and someone I REALLY admire Dr. Maya Angelou endorsed Hillary CLinton, YET NO ONE HAS ANYTHING positive to say about HILLARY CLINTON

The Obamabots think that all the Hillary supporters will vote for him this November should he be the nominee, well they should think again…..and I am not the only one.. c-span had 4 callers to say this as well…they will support mccain or nader or write in hillary

As for John Stewart, maybe he will have the guts to question Obama while Mrs. Clinton is on his show……….

CNN I KNOW YOU TEND TO BE MORE PRO_OBAMA, BUT STILL PLEASE POST THIS…I HAVE NEVER POSTED ON CNN BEFORE.

THanks you.

Ardnuas   March 1st, 2008 11:02 am ET

Time for her to start CRYING again………….or saying how unfair she is being treated!!! We want a women president, but NOT THIS WOMEN!
Obama/Edwards08 Si Se Puede

Luz   March 1st, 2008 11:02 am ET

Why is the headling of this"Clinton to take on John Stewart"? That was the link leading into this article even though the title here is "Clinto to appear in the Daily Show". Nothing in the content explains why the contentious title.

Is it because John has been too quick to pick on Hillary but has left Obama mostly un-touched? I am sure there is as much unused material from the Obama campaign as he has presented against Hillary. I used to like John Stewart. He was my one person I would like to meet. He has thrown some deserved punches to Hillarry. But as of lately he has been blind to his own bias against her, and then mock Hillary for pointing it out.

Kelly Anne   March 1st, 2008 11:02 am ET

Maybe she will announce she is dropping out for the good of the party?

Please Hillary, don't ruin 2008 for the Dems! The longer you hang on with no chance to win, the better it is for the GOP.

DO THE RIGHT THING!!!! We know you will!!!

king from toronto   March 1st, 2008 11:01 am ET

all she does is gives armunation to the republicans,to use against democrats,this is all the experience and leadership she talks about.she's destroying the party.

Jan E   March 1st, 2008 11:01 am ET

It is really sad that there are so many people who are still fooled by Hillary's campaign, I wonder how people can allow their rational judgment to be suspended like this and not take the time to look at what Hillary done to create divisions and ill feelings in the country. Yes she is tested and the test results are in, she can create enemies quicker than any other politician, she is a fighter for sure, but only for her personal ambitions and power. She has proven over and over that she is not reliable and will go wherever the wind blows to score. Yes, Hillary thrives on conflicts and will succeed in creating new ones. A leader that can resolve conflicts, she is definitely not. Good luck to all !!

Deborah   March 1st, 2008 11:01 am ET

Go home Hillary going on Jon Stewart is not going to change minds. You are not the right candidate for the Democrat Party. You try to have people believe you have experience. I realize that Barack does not have experience as President and neither do you. Give it a break and stop dividing the party. Democrats want OBAMA. Go home to New York and play your dirty politics. Evil Evil woman.

What ever it takes to get elected you are desperate!!!

Obama exemplifies a Presidential demeanor he is not catty desperate. He did not whine when he lost races
He did not FAKE a CRY He did not try to find someone else to blame when he lost races, He did not resort to gutter politics when he lost states in the primaries/caucuses. You are setting the clock back for women everywhere with your pitiful displays.

I am a former Bill Clinton supporter and I tell you I WOULD NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER EVER VOTE FOR YOU . You are a FAKE and YOU ARE EVIL. YOU PLAY DIRTY AND IT is NOT GOING TO HELP YOU WIN . PEOPLE SEE YOU FOR WHO YOU ARE (this is the reason you are not winning) You must now come to grips with the fact that we voted for Bill Clinton in 92 and in 96 NOT YOU. You are not going to ride his coattails into the Whitehouse. I do not care that you are a woman or that Barack is a Black man. I will vote for the best candidate and that candidate is OBAMA!
GO HOME AND WATCH AFTER Bill.

VOTE OBAMA FOR PRESIDENT 2008!!!!!!!!!!!

pd4hillary   March 1st, 2008 11:01 am ET

Actually, I thought her humor in the debates was right on!! But then again, I'm not brainwashed by Obama rhetoric that thinks it is blasphemy to critique him.

On the Iraq war vote, those senators thought they were being given inside information that the general public did not have. That information was skewed by the White House to present a very narrow picture. Obama as an outsider was no different than any of the rest of us. It was a guessing game as to whether they had weapons or not, posed a threat or not. He just happened to guess right, but it really was a 50/50 shot. Not a sound judgment call. Guarantee if he had been given the misinformation that senators like Hillary were being given, he would have voted the same way. Besides, I thought he was all about the future, not the past.

Check out his policies:
open for vounchers for public schools
not in favor of universal healthcare
open to letting "No Child Left Behind" stay in place, as is
While he and Hillary are on the same page on a lot of issues, her page since she was the first to come out with her policies and he just did "ditto," there are a few core issues they are not and these are Democratic issues. Beware of a Republican in Democrat clothing.

Enough of this craziness, Democrats in Texas and Ohio vote for Hillary to vote for true Democratic principles. Then, when she wins, we will hold her accountable to fulfill these promises. And, she will. It really is in her to do it!!!

No-good-judgement   March 1st, 2008 11:01 am ET

Can someone let know what is the difference between O and a church pastor?? To claim SAVIOR of world??? Everyone seeing Matrix knows THE ONE is not speaking to save the world, HE is fighting to save the world till his last breath… It is true ONE!!!

Jeremy C.   March 1st, 2008 11:01 am ET

First off, to Paul Brown… I commend you on your comments and shame on you to the two you said shame on him. Let the man speak his mind. Secondly, I also am willing to bet that she cries while on this show. It's happened twice now and I'm sure she's thinking, with a national audience, that the third time will be the charm.

I'm going to be voting for Obama because I want a change in my government. If you look at their policies, they are basically the same. There are small differences, but this isn't about policies. This is about politics and how one goes about those politics. I'm voting for Obama because of how he will do things.

K   March 1st, 2008 11:00 am ET

All people in TEXAS and OHIO..let's finish the game..let's finish HILLARY…

A Democrat   March 1st, 2008 10:59 am ET

We have to be united guys. Democrats need to stop killing each other before this nominee is chosen. I'll vote for either one, because both of them will make changes for good. But lets stop saying "Hillary is too desperate just to have power, or Obama is all words and no substance" because we all know that this is only going to change things for the worse. I'm a little offended about how much supporters have gone out of their way too try to destroy the other candidate. Either one will be a fine president. Lets focus on that.

Obama 08 or Hillary 08 I don't care

Mary   March 1st, 2008 10:59 am ET

The Canadian Government has already been quoted as saying there is no truth to that comment, and it is all over the Canadian news
Wonder who thought they would that lie out there!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

MikeinOhio   March 1st, 2008 10:59 am ET

Why don't you Hillary supporters realize that she has absolutely no chance whatsoever to defeat McCain in November because there are so many dems who will not vote for her. It is unbelievable that you cannot see how much the Clintons are despised in this country. Wake up, dems! Vote for Obama if you want a dem in the WH!

Kabi   March 1st, 2008 10:58 am ET

Mark my words people..ESP TO ALL HILLARY SUPPORTERS
SHE will cry and show some sort of emotion…GOD when will she learn her lesson?
I still cannot understand why her supporters still support this crying baby

BTW- I support Bloomberg..whosoever he endorses- I am voting for him/her

Mark   March 1st, 2008 10:58 am ET

John –
Excellent job on the Oscar ceremony earlier this week. Do America a fvor by asking Mrs. Clinton once again to release her tax returns, and for her husband to release his White House papers.
We would be ill-served to learn of a Clinton "smoking gun" on Wednesday, March 5, following these all-important primaries.
If the phone does ring at 3:00 am, it conceivably could be the IRS also asking her to release the returns, or perhaps the Secret Service reporting Bill yet again "missing in action."

Great job,

Andy, New York, New York   March 1st, 2008 10:58 am ET

This piece extracted from the news item above is such an understatement: "The scheduled appearance comes a day before crucial primaries in Ohio, Texas, Rhode Island, and Vermont where some pundits believe Clinton must do well in order to keep herself in the race for the Democratic nomination."

MUST DO WELL? What are the pundits' concept of WELL? Unless by WELL they mean beating Obama by 15 points in each of the four states on Tuesday, then Hillary will be saying FAREWELL!

How, do you, as a candidate with a 50-point lead a year ago, with the full backing of the nationwide DNC establishment, with the CLINTON name recognition, with 130 million dollars in campaign funds and with early backing of the majority of super delegates go to throwing the kitchen sink at a candidate whom you claim has no experience for the job that your 35 years experience qualifies you for?

If you cannot sustain your commanding lead by running a successful campaign, how can you be trusted to maintain America's lead as a superpower and run a successful national government?

Pardon me, ma'am, but your slip is showing and your halo is slipping.

Phyllis/ PA   March 1st, 2008 10:57 am ET

How does one go from being a community organizer to candidate in such a short time? We will find out when it is too late.

The only reason that Obama has been doing so well is simple. After the Bush administration, people will vote for anyone. People have no interest in knowing anything about Obama. He constantly claims to show how he makes god "judgments". Guess this is why he maintained a long term , 19 year relationship, with Rezko. Good judgment is also why he held meetings with Wiliam Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn. Ayers is the founder of the Weathermen and Dohrn was a member. (For those to young to know, the Weathermen were the most natorious and unrepentant violent figures of the sixties.)
Of all the churches that Obama choose, he selected one that is lead by Jeremiah Wright who admires Farrakhan. (Wow, great judgments!)
There are more examples but anyone who takes the time to look into any of these will learn much. Rezko goes to trial March 3. Unfortunately, elections are the next day. Not enough time to show the complete Obama/Rezko relationship. Most unfortunate.

Ron   March 1st, 2008 10:56 am ET

This should prove interesting. It will depend on if Jon feels like just being humourous, or if he is in one of his tough question moods. If he is in the tough question mood, Hillary will wish she hadn't come on. As far as some of the other Hillary supporter statements I have been reading..1) Hillary is in this positon because her campaign was VERY POORLY ran. 2) Just because she is the FIRST women to be a serious candidate is NOT a good enough reason for her to be selected. 3) On the Iraq war vote..You all need to remember she admitted she didn't even read the FULL report before voting. Does that REALLY sound like someone that is going to be ready day one?? and 4) If you look at her campaign objectively you have to admit many of the tatics have been less than admirable. Instead of remaining focused on her own strengths, she has tried to blame other forces like the media for her plight. I really hope she doesn't win because she basically blew it!! She's a fighter all right, but isn't it more important to be a WINNER.

Flem   March 1st, 2008 10:56 am ET

Oh PLEASE!!! Can't this woman have a single original thought? Obama did it, so now…SURPRISE…Hillary is going to do it as well (of her own accord, she'll be certain to remind you).

Guaranteed her "advisors" have told her to cry, because "victim-Hillary" is what won her New Hampshire. Sorry Shrillary; we americans have wised up since then, and are well aware of your "croc" tears.

Buh-Bye, Heinous Lady. On your way out, don't the the door hit ya where the Good Lord split ya.

Tom   March 1st, 2008 10:56 am ET

Hillary has the experience necessary to be president. She's lost some battles (1993 healthcare) won some battles (1997 SCHIP for children) and has a unique type of experience. I think that 8 years as a U.S. Senator, 8 years as a U.S. First Lady, and 12 years as a First Lady of Arkansa. During her whole career she has fought to make healthcare affordable and accessible to children and the uninsured. Hillary has been battle tested and even if you don't agree with her no one can doubt her sincerity. The policies she supports aren't just for campaign bumper stickers but are issues she's been fighting for her whole adult life.

Here's a question for Obama supporters: If he hadn't been a Senator when he voted to increase funding for the war in Iraq what would he be saying about that issue now? We all know the answer don't we. The truth is that there are a number of people who are like this. But, that won't solve the issue of what do we do in 2009. I think Hillar's plan has the best chance for success and the best chance to lead this country in a new and positive direction.

Raphael Houston, TX   March 1st, 2008 10:56 am ET

SO ASK YOURSELF–Why are you supporting HE who shall remain nameless? it's hope? change? Hope for what? Change for what? You want someone who is only able to attack the Iraq war when it's convenient? (when he wasn't in the US SENATE, he was a state senator) as his only evidence being I never voted for a resolution (of course that's convenient in the SENATE)? THEN WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT— HE has nothing! Offers nothing!!! WAKE UP AMERICA— HE who shall remain nameless is there for change- WHAT CHANGE? WHAT HOPE? WHAT DO YOU WANT HIM TO ACHIEVE??? Yes we can–Yes we can what? IT's OUR CAMPAIGN? OUR CAMPAIGN FOR WHAT? TO TAKE BACK WHAT? We are not the proletariat rising against the Bourgeoisie…Yes CAN WE DO? YES we do WHAT???— if Barack is in the white house what will he do? Do you know? All I know is that he talks a good talk, and spins his wheels… and we MUST VOTE FOR HILLARY, a straight talker– YES WE CAN!! GO HILLARY 2008… AT 3AM I want the most experienced DEMOCRAT ANSWERING THE PHONE!!! HILLARY CLINTON!!!

AtlantaVoter   March 1st, 2008 10:55 am ET

When the phone rings in the White House it's for real — Obama won't be able to say "oh, that's not what I meant" the next day.

Get real folks and stop drinking the Kool-Aid. We need someone who already knows the right answers as leader of the Free World. You don't get on-the-job-training with this job.

Hillary Clinton 2008

Janel, St. Paul, MN   March 1st, 2008 10:55 am ET

This should be interesting.

When Jon was interviewed by Larry King and asked about the candidates, Jon replied, "Hillary. Well, people recognize her name. She was the one who was married to the president."

John Z.   March 1st, 2008 10:55 am ET

I read the comment from Tanya (Chicago) and I agree with it 100%!Further to her remarks, one of the reasons that some Democrats are backing Obama is that they think he has a better chance of beating McCain in the general election. But the latest poll released on Friday from Pew Research shows both Clinton and Obama with a similar lead over McCain (50-45% vs. 50-43%, respectively). So where's the Obama advantage?

Gary in CT   March 1st, 2008 10:54 am ET

Why is it that any other woman in the United States who supported the household while her husband pursued his interests, took backseat to his career ambitions, and suffered through 35 years of sustained abuse by being lied to, cheated on, and publicly humiliated would be considered mentally abusedand in dire need of sunstantial pshycological treatment but Hillary is considered worthy of becoming the stable leader of the free world? Just look at her mood swings people!

A. K.   March 1st, 2008 10:54 am ET

Don't trust Clinton !! …. Ohio and Texas vote for Obama!

Clinton's ad was fear mongering !!! Her answer was wrong!!!

Of course she has many experiences, but bad experiences.

Texas for Hillary   March 1st, 2008 10:53 am ET

Anyone question Hillary's Experience?

Everyone on earth knows Hillary is CO-president who help bill make critical dicision. they do supior job in US history, they create 27 million jobs, it is the best time to be American in history. The real experience is not enough?

Why this highest job is "No experience required!!"

Judgement?

If obama have judgement, he should know his long time friend —middle east business man is corrupted. If Obama have brain, he will not buy a house which he can't afford, asking Rezko pay for the land, which is "bone head mistake"

Vote for Iraq is right judgement based on the intelligence and threat at that time. Things turn to wrong because the intelligence failture.

Obama always say "It is washington's fault, it is bush's fault", Why he never criticize his home state where Chicago is the most corrupted state?——Because he is one of them!!!

Wake up! You are going to vote another Bush, and much worse than bush, he is Hilter!

Hillary all the way!

Sue, NY   March 1st, 2008 10:53 am ET

Who cares!

MA   March 1st, 2008 10:52 am ET

Hillary has being playing the victim card.

-She went to court because navada workers supported Obama
-Now she is threatening to take taxas to court for the way they run the primaries in the state.
-She blame the media for supporting Obama.
-She wants women to vote for her because she is a woman
-She cry for sympathy
What a poor woman

Bill from Pa.   March 1st, 2008 10:51 am ET

Hillary is the one we need to lead our country.

Obama is cool, however I'm not looking for cool.

I want a smart women to run our country.

Thank you CNN for allowing to share my view point.

Austin, Texas   March 1st, 2008 10:51 am ET

Here's the bottom line of the General Election. Obama Supporters, you should read this. Hillary supporters, you already know because you're apart of it, like myself.

McCain will turn alot of independants voting for Obama due to his border aisle stance in the GOP. Obama is far left wing, and his supporters will slowly move once we get into the issues and solutions.

McCain will pick up more of the Latino vote than Obama. With Hillary out of the race, the Latino vote will sway a little more towards McCain. (Not saying all will, but a portion), which will increase McCain's already large Latino vote.

Obama will be pressed on national security, a field the only arguement he has for is, (I was against the war in Iraq). This will only hold up for so long. Fact is, we are there now, and it's not about looking to the past, it's about looking to the future.

And the biggest one:

The Majority of Obama supporters support him for his charisma, his charm, and his idea's of hope. Clinton supporters support her for her experience, her loyalty, and working with the Republicans on many topics. She has worked with McCain on many things.

Clinton supporters will be more likely to vote for John McCain over Barack Obama in a General Election due to the Experience factor. Obama has no military experience, nor does he have any foreign affairs experience. Altho heading a subcommittee for NATO in Afghanistan, he neglected it, had no meetings, to run his presidential campaign.

Electability is a huge thing right now. Obama supporters have less reason to not vote for Clinton, than Clinton supporters have for not voting for Obama.

This is a college educated theory. It is not fact, and I could be wrong, but it's something to look at. I myself cannot see myself voting for Obama. He makes me nervous in a time of turmoil. I cannot risk having Obama in office when there are so many people out there looking to harm us. I am a dedicated Hillary supporter, but will vote for John McCain in a General Election based soley on the fact, he is much more experienced in the field we are walking into. Obama is not.

PS in VA   March 1st, 2008 10:51 am ET

Tanya from Chicago—Your post is ridiculous!

I am sick of the experience argument! Bill Clinton had no experience either according to everyone when he was running. George Bush had experience—So everyone says. Now, experience is a big issue for Obama? If Hillary is so experienced, wouldn't her campaign had run better the Obama's? They both started out with $100 million dollars and she ran out of money. If she can't run a campaign why trust with running the country? Or are you counting on Bill to do the job?

Yes, change is not a bad thing to desire. We are sick of the corruption from these people. Character matter to some of us. Tell Hillary to release her tax returns and papers concerning her schedule while in the White House. Until then, we're not buying it!!!

Wayne   March 1st, 2008 10:51 am ET

CNN is intimidated by the clintons so now they only post pro Clinton comments. Not even Huckabee has lost 11 straight. This race should be over. Clinton has less experience as a public elected official. Obama was in elected office for 5 years before hill won her first office. Plus her Iraq vote led to 4000 deaths, 30000 wounded trillion dollars gone. That shouldn't be rewarded with the white house.

Mary   March 1st, 2008 10:50 am ET

It is interesting to me when I read these forums to see how deeply the Hillary hate goes. Most supporters of Clinton say positive things about her and hope that she can win against Obama. The Obama supporters are just plain mean and filled with hate.
It's all very discouraging.

John, Las Vegas, NV   March 1st, 2008 10:50 am ET

I'd like John to ask one question of Hillary. "Hillary, how do you think Democrats would react if Republicans had aired the same red phone ad you just ran implying that neither you nor Barack were fit to answer the call?" I can tell you they would be OUTRAGED at the backhanded smear of either of them. Any any Democrat should be equally outraged at Hillary's ad. If Barack becomes the nominee, if I were the Republicans I would just replay Hillary's red phone ad over and over to emphasize that Barack isn't ready to answer that call and McCain is ready.

Joe   March 1st, 2008 10:50 am ET

Obama is a flip flop period. Now calling the Canadians and telling them not to worry that he won't get rid of NAFTA! I just heard that news. What a joker. Then he slams Clinton for fear tactics because of her legitimate ad and what does he do but run basicly the same exact ad…so is he saying that he is using scare tactics as well? Nope…didn't think so. This guy is a joke!

paul, nyc ny   March 1st, 2008 10:49 am ET

Has anyone noticed the change in tone in the media towards Barack Obama? It is almost as if the press is realizing that they have been backing him so much that they forgot to ask him what he is all about or going to do other than CHANGE?

Even the rhetoric about Hillary's sinking campaign from a week ago has changed to "you never know she could come back". They no longer wonder aloud why she is in the race but question whether she will upset the race. Barack did it by winning. He did it once by stopping his winning streak.

The benefit of the Daily Show will be just that she gets to lighten up after working real hard.

WIsh you luck Hillary. WIN!!!

Alice Rea   March 1st, 2008 10:48 am ET

To All Americans:

Why isn't anyone seeing that this campaign is for the President of the United States.

I don't think any one that is voting for Obama is old enough to understand the importance of a resume or the condition of our country.

Granted Obama can speak but that isn't going to proove anything about his performance.

We know very little about Obama. Stop thinking that anytime people ask questions they are trying to smear him.

I want to know of any of criminal ties. I want to know about the radical groups that are supporting him. I want to know why he doesn't explain to the public that his Father was a Muslim. I want to know why he doesn't mention that his mother was an Athiest/ Agnostic.

His views and values are relevant. His connections with radical groups are importtant. His church needs to be explored.

Please let's not close our eyes to this being about smearing a candidate. ALL candidates should be investigated.

evans o.oseki, norway   March 1st, 2008 10:46 am ET

Wao…..she`s so full of despair and ready to do anything regardless of danger. Dems in foreign lands have spoken and said by voting that all they want is Obama. They live abroad and understands from outside, what the USA need. If Her Royal Highness, madam choose me or see hell does`t see this, then she has nothing to do or say about foreign issues. What will become of the Clintons after the show of shame they`ve been up to?

Carmen   March 1st, 2008 10:45 am ET

Ken your represent the typical man with your comment.

Hillary still gets my vote , and it is OK to cry.

Hillary is a strong women lets not forget that. 2008

John White, Texas   March 1st, 2008 10:44 am ET

How is this important to me as a voter? Why should I care about Hillary Clinton being on the daily show? I do not watch this particular show.

Shock and Awe   March 1st, 2008 10:44 am ET

There is a certain thing to this I just don't understand…
Hillary had a great commercial!!! Just another attempt of HE who shall not be named to be unoriginal (YEA WHAT SHE SAID, I AGREE WITH HILLARY) btw- I didn't vote for IRAQ? Well of course he didn't vote for it – HE wasn't even in the US Senate— how can he even say this as a positive!!!! How do we know that he wouldn't have voted with the other 77 Senators like John Kerry and Chris Dodd that both supported the RESOLUTION like Hillary Clinton— The likelihood here is for Obama to be in this group if he was in the senate— he would have joined the 77-23 vote. Obama has claimed that he regrets (in the Texas Debate) some of his other votes about not voting against a bill that was 98-0 claiming he was complacent… He who doesn't vote when it counts, when it matters… as a president do YOU want someone who votes along party lines or someone who you can trust to vote with what is in their conscience… Clinton's vote (and the other US Senators) was based on faulty evidence brought by the Bush administration and this point can't be underscored enough!!!

SO ASK YOURSELF–Why are you supporting HE who shall remain nameless? it's hope? change? Hope for what? Change for what? You want someone who is only able to attack the Iraq war when it's convenient? (when he wasn't in the US SENATE, he was a state senator) as his only evidence being I never voted for a resolution (of course that's convenient in the SENATE)? THEN WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT— HE has nothing! Offers nothing!!! WAKE UP AMERICA— HE who shall remain nameless is there for change- WHAT CHANGE? WHAT HOPE? WHAT DO YOU WANT HIM TO ACHIEVE??? Yes we can–Yes we can what? IT's OUR CAMPAIGN? OUR CAMPAIGN FOR WHAT? TO TAKE BACK WHAT? We are not the proletariat rising against the Bourgeoisie…Yes CAN WE DO? YES we do WHAT???— if Barack is in the white house what will he do? Do you know? All I know is that he talks a good talk, and spins his wheels… and we MUST VOTE FOR HILLARY, a straight talker– YES WE CAN!! GO HILLARY 2008… AT 3AM I want the most experienced DEMOCRAT ANSWERING THE PHONE!!! HILLARY CLINTON!!!

Juanita   March 1st, 2008 10:44 am ET

James: It's "Stewart" not "Stuart" and you say it is one of your favorite shows?????

I still find it hard to believe that most of those who comment for Hilary or Barack will vote for the other in November. My feelings are not so flexible that I can spew hate one month and then gush warm fuzzy feelings the next. Are we really that shallow?

I doubt if any of the comments put out really change anyone's mind but it gives the commentor a sense of power. Not so bad really.

Patrick   March 1st, 2008 10:44 am ET

Knowledgeable people: What are the odds Billary will cry this weekend so she can connect with the people?

Raum   March 1st, 2008 10:43 am ET

Hillary: "Shame on you John Stewart, eat your peas!"

Alice   March 1st, 2008 10:43 am ET

Two smart people can make things done. Vote Hillary! We can get Bill's advice for free. Two presidents' experience! What a fortune for this country!

Obama makes me scared. He voted over 100 times " present" on important issues. His judgement is a joke.

gail   March 1st, 2008 10:43 am ET

I can't understand why the Barak-supporters are so willing to endure another term in which an inexperienced blowhard fumbles the presidential reins. Hillary is, by far, the best candidate put forward; 'forgive' her her gender and put her in the White House where she belongs.

Charlotte   March 1st, 2008 10:42 am ET

What is wrong with you Obama-bots, Sen. Clinton did not cry. Sen. Clinton became a little emotional when speaking about her love for this country. Beats the hell out of being proud of your country for the first time in your life. Sen. Clinton gets a little upset at Obama for his lies about her health care plan that she cares very much about. I am proud she has the courage to stand up for what she believes in and will fight for it. Unlike Obama who now says Al Qaeda in Afghanastan was more important then the war in Iraq, yet never held a meeting while chairman of that committee for 14 months? He's a real leader alright. Furthermore, when he was supporting Kerry he said he is not sure how he would have voted on Iraq. He puts politics, and his dreams of the presidency above all else.

Pat   March 1st, 2008 10:42 am ET

I believe it was Einstein who said that great works were "1% inspiration, 99% perspiration," meaning that hard work is the overwhelming factor in success. Obama is certainly inspirational, but Hillary has proven time and time again that her hard work pays dividends. What a team they could be! But I think Hillary should be the leader . . . She has the experience Barack lacks. She won't make the mistakes he will inevitably make. He could learn and grow as vice president. He could ensure us of leadership in the future. By "spending" him now, who will we have in 2016?

Ron   March 1st, 2008 10:42 am ET

Oh Hillary Oh Hillary were art thou Hillary.Hillary has become the Mother of America and thats what this country needs right now.She will hold you fiscally responsible.Take care of the bullys picking on our country,Provide nutrition to our status in the world and put us on the right road to freedom and prosperiety any other vote will surly be the end to us.Poverty ,Hunger,Rich getting Richer at your sons and daughters expense and dont forget your grandchildren either.Vote Hillary means a vote for a Great America Again and back on the right path.Its up to you to steer the wheel in the right direction

jess_meadow TX   March 1st, 2008 10:41 am ET

WHAT REALLY MATTERS

Time and again our nation has been tested. Tested by forces within and outside. It amazes me how everytime we have emerged stronger, better and more prominent. Nothing appears to be different this time. The impending recession, the fractured employment strutcure and the growing burden of healthcare demands. Each of these elements does its share to slow our growth.

On a similar corollary, it needs immense pressure, heat and time for a DIAMOND to be made. In political parlance it means immense struggle, never ending desire and experience respectively. Who would even get close to saying Hillary lacks any of these elements.

The change form this only means settling for GRAPHITE. We have diamonds and we dont need graphite. Experience is the key. If you would choose an experienced interventional cardiologist for your heart' it should be natural for us to select someone we can trust. Experience matteres, matters and only matters.

No offence to the other guy, remember with pressure, heat and time, he has potential to be a diamond to. At this time, I am sorry, far from it.
I had a chance to go through every fine print of HIllary's policies which sound a sturdy solution to our contemporary problems.

There is no stopping Hillary. Go HILLARY go. HIllary, a resonating victory awaits you…

HIllary '08 , TX
HILLARY ALL THE WAY '08

jess   March 1st, 2008 10:40 am ET

If she attempts more humor like she did in the debate, the ratings will hit rock bottom.

corky   March 1st, 2008 10:40 am ET

Iam looking forward to seeing the show. Hillary should ask Obama if all he can campaign on is the Iraq War how come he isn't opposed to taking endorsements from fellow senators who voted like her such as Kennedy, Kerry, Dodd,etc.etc. to name a few. Hillary is a better canidate to lead this country out of all the problems the Bush administration got everyone into. Don't tell me experience doesn't count because it does. Obama to this date I do not know what he is all about just speeches a whole lot of nothing. Have fun and Good Luck on Tuesday. Hilllary 2008 Cnn Please post this.

Ken   March 1st, 2008 10:40 am ET

Yeah, I have seen what I hoped to see in my life time I really like Jon Stewart, he asks the tough one's I'd like to see her answer, "What took you so long?" "Obama and McCain were here after their Run" Quiet is kept she didn't need him until now. Watch the Spin Factor, watch the same old politics. As for a Presidential Run, I prefer seeing what's been lacking, Good Common Since. The most qualified canidates did even make to the finals, All I see is a person who saw the Power of America and had big dreams, A candidate that seen it all in Washinton i.e. most experienced. And a guy who felt the need to see something good change for America, And stood up, check his past, He's always stood up, Obama is where he is now because he stood UP. And made many accomplishments, i.e. first African American President at Harvard Law School. Turned down Huge Job Offers, to be a Community Organizer, Standing UP on principle

Carmen   March 1st, 2008 10:40 am ET

Hillary all the way in 08.

No-good-judgement   March 1st, 2008 10:40 am ET

If O is so goood, just wonder why John Edwards didnot endorse him right away??? Let true fighter fight for you not just speak for you…

Ken   March 1st, 2008 10:39 am ET

OK…..my prediction:

Hillary will cry at least one time on national television prior to March 4th. She is behind in Texas and needs to sway the "sympathetic" vote to push her over the edge.

Mark my words, she will fake at least one visible, emotional display in public. It' all an act and part of the strategy.

Poor Hillary. If I cannot cheat, fearmonger and lie my way to the nomination, then I'll just have to cry.

Ladybug   March 1st, 2008 10:39 am ET

Paul Brown shame on you for your statement……………

Mike in TX   March 1st, 2008 10:38 am ET

Good, maybe this will help her win over some of the 10% of college students that are able to think for themselves.

KDC   March 1st, 2008 10:38 am ET

6 years as a Senator is vast experience? Sure, he's got Obama beat unless you include his state legislature experience. Oh wait, she includes all of Bill Clinton's terms in the white house as well. And what did she do there? Oh yeah, the failed health plan, poorly executed and a good example of her effectiveness as a leader. New York with less jobs than she started? Oh, that's this administration is the excuse. No creativity in execution there. Why won't she release her taxes? What's she hiding there? What about the documents so we can actually see what she did while Bill was in the White House? I want transparency in my government and she's already showing she's not willing to do that.

Hillary has proven much to this country: divisiveness, ineffectiveness, and secrecy. I can get that anywhere. Obama is someone who has already shown to be more intelligent, calm, logical, and sensible than any other candidate. Living in Louisiana, I've already experienced a governor that cried and was ineffectual. I'm not about to vote a similar candidate into the White House.

Pat Stone   March 1st, 2008 10:38 am ET

The county is taking the wrong road when it comes to electing the Democratic nominee. Everything seems to indicate that Obama is going to win, and this will be a huge mistake.
The press, though this is "unpopular" to say, is in fact protecting Obama. He is fighting with 6 OZ gloves while Hillery is being made to fight with 16 OZ gloves. I've got news, John McCain is not going to use any gloves. This will be a bear nuckle fight, and Obama is going to loose.
The issues that McCain is going to bring up don't apply to Hillery. She in fact, has a much better chace of winning over McCain.
The so call "Dream Team" would in fact have the better chance to beat the GOP in November, but Obama won't pick Hillery if he wins. He feels he doesn't need her, and in fact feels like she would be a liability. Hillery on the other hand, I think is smarter than that and I beleive would pick Obama as her running mate, and bring to the table the support he currently enjoys.
The fact is that Obama is not ready, and his record on the sente proves this, but no one cares, why ? because there are those who just simply don't like Hillery and would see "anyone" win over her, at any price….and the price, is steep in deed.
Obama is destined to be a "one term" President. If I were Hillery, I would not accept being his running mate if asked and wait four years then run again against him. Provided he wins, which I don't think he will. Regardless of the Presidential race outcome between Obama and McCain, four years from now, Hillery will be able to say "I told you so". Why ? if Obama wins, because he doen't have the experience to deal with the domestic issues, and he will be a much weaker President than Carter on Foreign Policy issues. If McCain wins, because the weaknesses that he has, and which Hillery has been trying to expose, will result in the Democrats loosing a golden opportunity to win the White House. At a time when we are in a ressession and at war, he's just the wrong person to have in the White House. Period. This is not the time to pick a President based on "popularity". We need someone with guts and experience to get the job done, regardless of how we feel personally about them (or her, in this case). there is simply, way to much at stake.
The Hillery first, Obama second ticket, would have the greatest chance of creating unity among the democrats and cooperation across party lines to brake a stalemate that has existed for the past 12 years or so, since the Moinica fiasco, which by the way, was fuled by the GOP in an effort to control the Congress, Senete and the White House out of greed for power.
It might be to late. If Hillery looses Texas, I think she would quit because she doen't want to tear the Democratic party if the fight were to come down to Super Delegates. I beleive her loyalty and service to the party are greater than her own amitions for Presidential office and the historical implications of that achievment. That would silence some who beleive otherwise, not not all. There are those who would kick her when she's down. Hatered is indded an ugly thing devoid of humanisum.

Ladybug   March 1st, 2008 10:38 am ET

You get my vote April 22……from Pa.

david   March 1st, 2008 10:38 am ET

In Texas, the same people that voted for Bush over Gore are voting for Obama over Hillary. Then they will vote McCain in Nov to put him in the WH.

Now, many people love Gore and Hate Bush. If Obama or McCain get it, in a couple of years you'll be wondering why you weren't smart enough to elect Hillary.

I just can't believe how stupidity can repeat itself over and over. There is not much difference between Clinton and Obama except that she more prepared for the job and can beat McCain particularly with O has her running mate. Obama can not. They are going to chew him up and spit him out. Raise your IQ and get a democrat in there people! The only sure way will be a Clinton/Obama ticket. If you like one with your brain…you will like the other.

VOTE HILLARY NOW
VOTE CLINTON /OBAMA IN NOV

We all know Obama will happily take her offer for VP, but she can not accept to be VP for someone that will be learning from her. Please don't screw it up America…get it right!

Cosmic Comedy Queen - Hillary is the Change!   March 1st, 2008 10:38 am ET

Go Hilary! We are routing for you! You ar the only man for the job!

JCL, Kentucky   March 1st, 2008 10:37 am ET

Check Reality Again works for Obama — paid staffer!!!

JMV   March 1st, 2008 10:37 am ET

"Now, one of Clinton's laws of politics is this. If one candidate is trying to scare you and the other one is try get you to think, if one candidate is appealing to your fears and the other one is appealing to your hopes, you better vote for the person who wants you to think and hope."
-Bill Clinton, 2004

Bill PA.   March 1st, 2008 10:37 am ET

Paul Brown shame on you…………………………………………

Sue   March 1st, 2008 10:36 am ET

Thanks Tanya. I am so tired of the Hillary bashing! Also so what if she cries! Lets get to the issues we as Americans are facing and vote for the one person best suited to handle the issues. I say, ready on day one with Solutions for Change….Go Hillary! Obama is a sweet talking Bush….no idea on what to do only has words.

Linda   March 1st, 2008 10:36 am ET

I agree with Tanya that we have no time for trial and error, hoping for Anything new just to revitalize our government….even a fresh face like Obama, who is capitalizing on the fears of another White House dynasty in the making, cannot solve all our problems… his campaign is also a fierce, hard-hitting machine – packaged as hope and renewal, when it's just another way to derail the democratic party…I'd love to see him as VP and be groomed into the change-leader we all hope him to be… but will his competitive nature be able to handle a strong female president as his boss?

Bill PA.   March 1st, 2008 10:36 am ET

Hillary is always composed………………….08……………………………………..

Thank you CNN for all your support…………………………………………………

Paul Brown   March 1st, 2008 10:35 am ET

“It’s 3 a.m. and your children are safe and asleep. But there’s a phone in the White House, and it’s ringing. Something’s happened in the world. If Hillary Answers…. "Bill, It's for you…"

dee   March 1st, 2008 10:34 am ET

GO HILLARY, I WILL BE WATCHING. YOU WILL WIN , HANG IN THERE.

J. Preston   March 1st, 2008 10:34 am ET

Obama and judgement- the guy risked his and his family's health by smoking cigarettes all of his adult life and we are being asked to trust his judgement ! Wake up Obama supporters !!

elaine   March 1st, 2008 10:33 am ET

I AM SO SICK OF HEARING ABOUT HILLIARY EXPERIENCE. THE ONLY EXPERIENCE SHE HAS IS HOW TO BE A LYING DECEITFUL WIN AT ANY COST POLITICIAN. IF SHE IS SO EXPERIENCE THAN WHY DID SHE VOTE FOR THE WAR….NAFTA…INCREASING TAX LOOP HOLES FOR COMPANIES THAT GO OVERSEA'S WITH OUR JOBS….MISMANAGING HER CAMPAIGN….FAILED AT THE FIRST ATTEMPT FOR UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE…SHADY DEALINGS IN WATERGATE AND TRAVELGATE..VOTED TO MOST BELOVED DEMOCRAT OF BIG BUSINESS IN FORTUNE 100 MAGAZINE…RECEIVED MORE MONEY FROM SPECIAL INTEREST THAN ANY OTHER REPUBLICAN OR DEMOCRAT…I COULD GO ON BUT WHAT'S THE USE….CLINTON SUPPORTERS CAN'T SEEM TO GRASP THAT THEIR GIRL IS POWER HUNGRY AND CORRUPT AND SHE WILL DO AND SAY ANYTHING TO WIN…SHE IS ENTITLED SO SHE FEELS…

Jacques   March 1st, 2008 10:33 am ET

This is not the smartest move, a last minute appeal to young voters from a woman who has proven her inability to deliver one liners or have any comedic timing what-so-ever.

Lets hope someone writes better lines for her than the Xerox and SNL lines.

WomanWithHope   March 1st, 2008 10:32 am ET

STOP THIS GARBAGE TALK.
CLINTON IS THE BEST CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT. SHE WILL NOT CRY AND HAS NEVER CRIED IN PUBLIC YOU IDOTS. TEARING UP IS NOT CRYING YOU FOOLS.

James Smith   March 1st, 2008 10:32 am ET

I love John Stuart. He's a funny and smart man, and his show is awesome. I'm sure Sen. Clinton will show America how warm, engaging and funny she is.

Listen, the Clinton camp did not say Sen. Obama MUST win all states big to remain viable. No one is that stupid. They said he SHOULD win the four states big, considering how much he's outspent Sen. Clinton. Read carefully, folks.

Tim R   March 1st, 2008 10:32 am ET

No, we don't have time for "trial and error", which is what we would get with Hillary.

She tried to get universal health care and failed [due to backroom politics and unwillingness to compromise].

She voted incorrectly to let Bush invade Iraq, and we're paying an enormous price.

She supported NAFTA, and is now trying to change her tune, and we've lost a ton of jobs overseas.

Obama's history and experience are far superior to Clinton's.

This is a no-brainer.

BTW, why won't Hillary release her tax returns? What is she hiding?

Johan Bc Canada   March 1st, 2008 10:32 am ET

perhaps she can sing our national anthem: "Oh Bamada."

Indie in Iowa   March 1st, 2008 10:32 am ET

Hey there is another guy running who opposed the war, Nader. Obama better come up with something better. He is not the only one who opposed it from day one. Also Nader has been getting it right from day one since before Obama understood what a vote was.

NH resident   March 1st, 2008 10:31 am ET

Tanya Chicago….thanks, well said…..

Junebug   March 1st, 2008 10:31 am ET

Zeena why are sooooooooooooo against Hillary…….???

The best you can say is crying………….

Hillary all the way 2008.

Wayne   March 1st, 2008 10:31 am ET

At last the worm has started to turn. Americans are waking up to the fact that the media has tried to push Obama down our throats, while constantly disparaging Hillary Clinton. It's great that Hillary is going to do this show. Sometimes showing a little humor goes a long way. SNL proved that last week! Rock On Hillary!!!!!

Teresa C   March 1st, 2008 10:30 am ET

When we are obligated to vote for a President we really should look deep into our candidates and do our very best to make the right choice. My son is in Iraq for the 2nd tour. when he comes home for R&R people always ask him how he feels about the invasion of Iraq? He answeres them with this.. " be carefull who we vote for" So please look deep and really think about who we vote for.. It may cause one of your children to end up in War.. Hillary Clinton is my choice, after CAREFULL research and deep insight.. She has always been making CHANGES and I believe she will continue to do so.. Please do your homework Americans!!!

Junebug   March 1st, 2008 10:30 am ET

The Clintons are the best……………………………….Whoa

s.positive   March 1st, 2008 10:30 am ET

Too late, Her game is over…

Alice   March 1st, 2008 10:30 am ET

American love Hillary!

Hillary 08!

Check reality again!   March 1st, 2008 10:29 am ET

Tanya works for Clinton – paid staffer

Ben from D.C.   March 1st, 2008 10:29 am ET

Remind me not to Tivo that…

truth   March 1st, 2008 10:28 am ET

Obama himself is a cheating show! Lots of the political shows will follow him in the future to make people smart.

Mike Piazza   March 1st, 2008 10:28 am ET

She is routinely booed by the younger studio audience of the Daily Show. Should be interesting, if nothing else…

KC, Dallas Texas   March 1st, 2008 10:28 am ET

Think about this: if Obama doesn't talk…what else make you think he is qualified? None, right?

He said, "my friend gave me those words, I think it's good, so I used it in my campain."

Google his fundraiser friend, Tony Rezko, who was arrested last week.

Wake up folks!! Don't just criticize Hillary on voting for entering Iraq, back then 90% Americans support it. It's Bush who abused the right to let the troops stay until now.

Hillary 08!!!!

Pedro in AZ   March 1st, 2008 10:27 am ET

It is in the interest of this GREAT NATION to elect someone with experience and unquestioned LOYALTY to the United States of America. Someone who has dedicated his life and placed his life on the line for THIS country. That person is JOHN SYDNEY MCCAIN.

Stop Obama before it is too late.

dee   March 1st, 2008 10:26 am ET

Tanya- I can understand your plea as I used to be Hillary supporter myself ..how can Obama be VP when he is winning now?

david   March 1st, 2008 10:26 am ET

Dang your long winded. Tanya…but made some excellent points.

Wake up America before it's too late! I know lots of Repugs voting for Obama in Texas today because they know he can't beat McCain in Nov.

VOTE HILLARY…GET A DEMOCRATE THAT IS READY AND KNOWS WHAT TO DO IN THE WHITE HOUSE! PLEASE DON'T BE STUPID AGAAAAAAAAAAIN.

Texas for Hillary!

Reality check   March 1st, 2008 10:26 am ET

Great, always love to see Hillary on television. She has a great sense of humor and is quick with answers. you gotta' love Hillary!

Zeena   March 1st, 2008 10:25 am ET

god..I am 10000000 % sure she is going to cry in that show…MARK MY WORD

Happyhillary   March 1st, 2008 10:25 am ET

I am looking forward to seeing this show!
Hillary will win!

Kat, Huntington, West Virginia   March 1st, 2008 10:24 am ET

thank you Tanya! Very well said and I only hope people read your post and spread that message. I could not agree more. Stop with the slams and making fun of Hillary, look at who is best for this job and vote for leadership and experience. Hillary!

elrali   March 1st, 2008 10:22 am ET

Obama must be the PRESIDENT.
Clinton can be a great VP.

elrali   March 1st, 2008 10:20 am ET

Hillary, please retire from the race !

AR   March 1st, 2008 10:20 am ET

At least logic won't be required. Latest example – HRC campaign says Obama will be in trouble if he doesn't win all of the contests next Tuesday because he spent so much. I guess that's why we had president Perot and why Mitt Romney is the Republican nominee, right…? no…wait

Bill J from Pa.   March 1st, 2008 10:20 am ET

Love you Hillary………………………………..08…………………………………………

Tanya, Chicago   March 1st, 2008 10:18 am ET

It makes me really sad to see that we are again heading in the wrong direction. I had the same feeling 5 years back when we decided to invade Iraq. Most of people were fired up that time and wanted to bomb every camels butt in Iraq. Yes, I remember that! But look what we have bombed? Its our Social Security, our Economy, our freedom, Our Education system, Our Medicare, Our Health Insurances and everything else.

Our Currency value has lost 25% of the value in the last 5 years. Now those who can still afford a European vacation soon realizes that anyone in Europe has more buying power than well to do families in US. I know, some economists will soon correct me by saying that this is good for our economy and good for our exports. But think who is benefitting from this! We all know that the jobs that are outsourced to other countries are not coming back to US easily until it is no longer profitable for the US companies to operate in other countries.

I can understand that people are so desperate for change but that does not mean that we should vote for a person without any experience. We have to be very careful what we wish for as democracy is a powerful tool in the hands of people. We know that in certain parts of the world even Hamas and Communist are democratically elected to office! So before voting not just think about what’s good for you, think about what is good for our country. Vote with your Brain and not your Hearts… I know I said too much but you get the idea!

You know the funniest part? Even if Obama does not deliver the change he promised in Washington and around the world, no can blame him because all he said was "Yes we can", and Obama can rightfully point out that everyone else have to do their part for any meaningful change to happen!

I honestly don’t think that we have time for trial and error when our economy is heading towards a recession and our foreign polices is already in a great depression. I agree that Obama is a person who knows what is wrong with the world (bullet pointed list of changes) but knowing everything that is wrong with the world enough? We all know what wrong with this world; we need a plan to fix the problems. To the people who are still ignorant about the issues affecting the world, listing the problems itself may be a huge deal but not to sensible people who really cares how to bring real change in everyone’s life.

And do we elect Obama just because he opposed the Iraq war first (when everyone knew its wrong but still had to agree to invade because the White House presented an excellent case for the Iraq War)? Well we made a big mistake by invading a country without a good plan, but again why are we doing the same mistake again by voting for a person without a plan? Am I just going nuts here or is something really wrong here?

We all know Obama is a good, honest man and we want him to serve this country for a long time. So what’s wrong if he becomes the VP and getting some real experience before becoming the president? After all it’s all in the interest of this great nation!

democracy   March 1st, 2008 10:15 am ET

WHat is she going to do : cry?
what is she going to say: blah blah blah, her old same stuff, attacks on Senator Obama, because she can never focused on what she says she has done in 35 years.
who cares where she appears, I just h ope that the people of this country sees through her phony crying, her mean personality and ugly words.
We want change, and we dont want more Clintons or Bush ……….

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room. Download this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

Follow us on Twitter

CNN on TwitterGet Ticker updates the moment they appear online via the Web, SMS, or instant messages.
Follow politicalticker

Categories
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. All comments should be relevant to the topic and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. You are solely responsible for your own comments, the consequences of posting those comments, and the consequences of any reliance by you on the comments of others. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying and other information you provide via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2008 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com VIP