March 3, 2008
Posted: 03:44 PM ET
 Obama's campaign downplayed an economic advisor's conversation with a Canadian official.
Obama's campaign downplayed an economic advisor's conversation with a Canadian official.

(CNN)Barack Obama's campaign manager downplayed reports Monday an economic advisor discussed the Illinois senator's position on NAFTA with a Canadian official, characterizing the meeting as an "informal" discussion not under the direction of the campaign.

"This is being reported as if somehow this is an official meeting of an Obama representative and the Canadian government," Obama campaign manager David Plouffe said in a conference call with reporters. "That was not the case. He was essentially doing a walking tour and was essentially having a casual conversation and the report on that conversation was not accurate. "

The meeting was first reported last week by Canadian television network CTV. The report referenced anonymous sources that said one of Obama's chief economic advisors, Austan Goolsbee, said the candidate was only talking tough on NAFTA for political reasons, and would likely not seek to change the trade agreement with Canada if he became president. Both Obama's campaign and the Canadian embassy immediately denied Goolsbee had ever made such a suggestion, and did not reveal Goolsbee had ever spoken with the Canadian government.

But the Associated Press reported Monday it had obtained a memo from a Canadian diplomat essentially confirming CTV's story and stating Goolsbee said Obama's tough talk on NAFTA was "more about political positioning than a clear articulation of policy plans."

Goolsbee denied Monday he ever made such a suggestion, and the Canadian embassy issued a statement saying there was it had "no intention to convey, in any way, that Senator Obama and his campaign team were taking a different position in public from views expressed in private.

“The Canadian Embassy and our Consulates General regularly contact those involved in all of the Presidential campaigns and, periodically, report on these contacts to interested officials. In the recent report produced by the Consulate General in Chicago, there was no intention to convey, in any way, that Senator Obama and his campaign team were taking a different position in public from views expressed in private, including about NAFTA. We deeply regret any inference that may have been drawn to that effect.

Plouffe told reporters Monday that the Clinton campaign was pushing the story as part of their so-called "kitchen sink" strategy.

"We understand we are in the closing days of a campaign here and the Clinton Campaign is trying to make a lot of this and I think in some part, heel their own problems on their NAFTA positioning," Plouffe said. "This is part of the kitchen sink campaign the Clinton campaign telegraphed last week. They're throwing anything and everything out there to try to revive their flailing campaign."

UPDATE: Speaking with reporters Monday, Obama said he was unaware Goolsbee had met with a Canadian official.

"It turned out that the Canadian consulate in Chicago contacted one of my advisers, Austan Goolsbee, on their own initiative, invited him down to meet with him, he went down there as a courtesy," Obama said. "And at some point they started talking about trade and NAFTA, and the Canadian embassy has confirmed that he said exactly what I've been saying on the campaign trail, which is that I believe in trade, but it's important for us to have labor/environmental standards that are enforceable."

– CNN Ticker Producer Alexander Mooney

Filed under: Barack Obama


Ayyub, Richmond, Va   March 3rd, 2008 6:03 pm ET

AY! Clinton News Network, Hillary is not going to beat the GOP just ask Limbaugh.

Shelby08   March 3rd, 2008 6:02 pm ET

Obama Take the High Road, Right! Its seems your campaign manager, David Plouffe, can do all your dirty work for you. Your campaign has gone very negative against Sen. Clinton it's just done by David Plouffe, not you, right? Sen. Clinton didn't come up with this story, nor has the Clinton campaign pushed it. I heard it first this morning on CNN and they seem to favor Obama in their reporting. But, by all means, explain away what was actually said by your representatives. I would like clarity from the Obama camp on any issue. I'm sure the voters in Ohio would too!,

It's Time For The Right Change! Hillary 08

Patrick   March 3rd, 2008 6:01 pm ET

To all the Obama followers… PLEASE USE YOUR INTELLIGENCE AND READ THE REPORT ABOVE!

IT DOES NOT SAY HILLARY'S CAMPAIGN IS MAKING IT UP, IT SAY's A CANADIAN TV (since CNN, MSNBC, FOX are drooling over Obama)
Reported this. The AP obtained a memo today that was sent to Canadian officials after the meeting took place that highlights all the talking points fot he meeting!! Hillary has every right to request that he come clean!! The American people have every right to know whether he is making side deals with other countries. No wonder he was attacking Hillary on this….LOL he thought he had it all worked out!!

OHIO, TEXAS, RHODE ISLAND, & VERMONT HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW ABOUT THIS "SIDE DEAL".

Goo Hillary!!!

4Hillary   March 3rd, 2008 6:00 pm ET

CNN - Please Post ~ Important Endorsments

~Two Former Admirals Endorse Senator Clinton~ 3/2/08
Senator Clinton today is proud to announce the endorsement of two distinguished, retired admirals, Vice Admiral Donald C. Arthur and Rear Admiral Stuart F. Platt. They join an eminent group of 30 retired admirals and generals who have endorsed Senator Clinton to be our nation’s next Commander-in-Chief.

Many of our nation’s most distinguished military officers stand proudly with Hillary Clinton because they believe that she has the strength, experience and leadership necessary to be President and Commander-in-Chief. They include five former general and flag officers at the rank of four stars, including two former chairmen and one vice-chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. In addition, more than 2,000 veterans and military retirees are members of Senator Clinton's national and state veterans’ steering committees.

Adding 2 more to the list ….GOOO HILLARY!!!!

Tony, Enterprise, Alabama   March 3rd, 2008 5:56 pm ET

That is the problem with Barack Obama, he downplays everything; and, so far, the media is letting him get away with it.

From Rezco to Nafta he never has to answer for anything.

I saw a recent Faux News gathering of Obama supporters, none of them could name anything he has accomplished, or any of his positions on anything. They all said they support him "because we like him"…the same thing George Bush supporter's named.

We have had almost 8 years of a not qualified President, can we afford 4 more?

The media needs to act like journalists again and peel the onion. There are layers and layers of Obama to uncover.

Get busy!

concern citizen   March 3rd, 2008 5:55 pm ET

Hillary talks about the entire situation as proof that Obama is all talk and no action. Obama is saying one thing to voters and having closed meeting with Canada saying something different. However, she has flip flopped many times. She told the people in Ohio she was aganist NAFTA and there were quotes from interviews and books that contridicted her statements in which she supported NAFTA. She stated that she voted for the war based on the evidence presented to her. Jay Rockafella who is a member of the senate intelligence committee stated she did not read the document before she voted for the war. This is horrible. How could she have based her vote on evidence when she did not read the documents with the so call evidence? Is this the type of leadership the country wants in which a candidate does not read information before voting for war? This should be discussed in the media.

CHERYL   March 3rd, 2008 5:55 pm ET

IS THIS WHY BORACK LOOKS SO BAD IN THIS PICTURE?

HE LOOKS BEATEN DOWN!!!!!!!!!

GO SENATOR CLINTON!!!!!!!!!!!

Virginia   March 3rd, 2008 5:54 pm ET

I wouldn't be surprised if someone from the Clinton camp planned this whole NAFTA fisaco. The Clinton camp will not stop even when the facts are clear . Truly, she can only run on a kitchen run campaign. That has been obvious since Obama has gained momentum.

I trust the American people are smarter and tired of the politics of hate.

Now she is a qualified president for sure, but definitely not a president that America needs right now to unify the country. There are more people that hate her than the anti-Obama's. There are more people inspired by Obama than Hillary. There are more young votes involved for Obama than Hillary.

Go OBAMA '08

OBAMA4LIARS   March 3rd, 2008 5:54 pm ET

LIAR LIAR LIAR…TEXAS Latinos

CHERYL   March 3rd, 2008 5:54 pm ET

THE BOTTOM IS ABOUT TO FALL OUT OF THIS WHOLE FARCE!

THE SOONER THE BETTER!!!!!!!!!

CHERYL   March 3rd, 2008 5:52 pm ET

I LIVED IN CANADA FOR TWO YEARS.

THE CANADIANS ARE GOOD HONEST PEOPLE!

THEY WOULD NEVER BUY INTO HIS CRAP EH!

Arni, Austin,TX   March 3rd, 2008 5:51 pm ET

I want to know if Goolsbee was acting on behalf of Obama? Is Obama committing to those words that he WILL renegotiate NAFTA?

I thought it thowing all in kitchen sink. This looks like sink is being thrown at Obama!

Politics at lowest ebb. Disgusted at this. If Hillary will primary, I will vote McCain.

Go Obama!

OBAMA4LIARS   March 3rd, 2008 5:50 pm ET

OBAMA IS A LIAR…OBAMA IS A LIAR>>>FINALLY THE IDIOT GETS EXPOSED>>TYPICAL

grace babcock   March 3rd, 2008 5:49 pm ET

Has anyone figured out how many of Sen. Obamas senatorial and high profile superdelagates voted for the war? Just a thought. Hillary did not do it all by herself. Grace B Poetland Maine

Matt NC   March 3rd, 2008 5:46 pm ET

How does anyone come to the conclusion that the Clinton Campaign is pushing this story? Obama is not a Saint nor is he an Earth Angel sent by God. He is capable of making mistakes like everyone else. So, why can't the Obama supporters stop blaming negative press on the Clinton campaign. This is absolutely crazy. This man is not the answer that America is hoping for. I personally think that the Obama supporters are beginning to realize that the Dream that Obama has been talking about for almost a year is about to awaken to the reality of a nightmare- He is a FAKE.

Grif   March 3rd, 2008 5:45 pm ET

In a "Word" . Cheat!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Asian's from Obama to Hillary   March 3rd, 2008 5:45 pm ET

The more I had upclose and personal with Obama, the more I do not trust him. He's fraud! He's talker! He's two faced!

Be a real Man. Tell the truth!

jade   March 3rd, 2008 5:45 pm ET

he ditto heads, the canadian CONSERVATIVE govt., like Rush "pigman" Limbugger, is doing what they can to get Hillary to run, so McCain can beat her.

suckers.

Capital G   March 3rd, 2008 5:45 pm ET

I am growing sick of this campaign, it is on the verge of turning into politics as usual and it sucks. I believe all of us are joining in the fighting with each other like kids in a School yard, like anything we do is ever gonna make a difference in Washington to benefit the people.

I want McCain, vote Clinton, voteObama, and in the end democrat or republican, it all remains the same. No health care, Nafta in place, Amero on the rise, gas, Schools, Iraq, and everything else will continue to squeeze all that is left out of this Country. So do enjoy the fighting over the internet, because it will not compare to when you are standing in the food line to feed your family.

Peggy Goederer   March 3rd, 2008 5:45 pm ET

I'm seeing parallels between Barack Obama and Jimmy Carter, and wondering how far they go.

They're both men of high ideals seen as "outside" the political establishment campaigning at a time when the public is/was totally disgusted with the political establishment.

Jimmy Carter's presidency is generally viewed as a failure. My understanding is that part of the reason is that he refused to play the usual Washington "ball" game - trading favors for votes. He got in the way of the legislators and their pork, and they retaliated by refusing to let him accomplish anything.

You could say he was too moral.

I'm wondering whether Barack would encounter similar problems. Could he work effectively with our not very moral or idealistic legislature?

Latina Voter   March 3rd, 2008 5:44 pm ET

Finally, the media has showed some backbone. Because of the media Obama had been Flawless, but TRUE COLORS always show up in due time. Example: Real Estate dealings with Rezko, Conversation RE: NAFTA with a Canadian official for political reasons and a friend to an activist. HMMMMMM!!!! Mr. Words Matter. As you can see your actions are not high. ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THEN WORDS. It is easier to give a speech, then to make a decision. No one will ever no how you would of voted regarding the war. (With your voting record you would of voted present.) You did not have a voice at that time. So your going to have to say a lot more, then I was running for Senate at the time you were making your speech against the war. Your judgement is being tested now.

Hillary Clinton 2008!!!!!!!

ANTI CLINTONS   March 3rd, 2008 5:43 pm ET

Get rid of NAFTA< so what is wrong with that? go Obama!

4Hillary   March 3rd, 2008 5:42 pm ET

Obama supporters - ask yourselves this:

1) If there was a "side deal" being made…Don't you think it is in the best interest of Canada to stick to the story the Obama camp is saying??

2) CTV has said they are "sticking to there story" about the meeting because they received the information from a valid source.

Last week Obama said that the "meeting never took place"…..Today, when the AP got a hold of a copy of the memo now he says…."there was a meeting" but NAFTA was not discussed!?? Are you guys not concerned about this?? What if it is true?? You think the Bush years were bad…well you have seen nothing yet if Obama wins. Don't you think you deserve the "truth" before you vote??? I do.

burnham scott   March 3rd, 2008 5:42 pm ET

The well oiled CARLYLE machine is firing on all cylinders.

Bill   March 3rd, 2008 5:42 pm ET

This is the type of negative campaigning that will truly hurt the Democratic party in the General election. If this discussion occurred while an Obama supporter was giving a tour, this is nothing more than an Obam supporter's view as to what Obama stated in the debate. That does not make it Obama's view. This Nafta statement by Clinton really is negative campaigning at its worst. Rush Limbaugh has said he wants to keep Clinton in the race because she will work harder to destroy Obama and go negative than any Republican would to win the presidency. That is how bad she wants this presidency….she is willing to destroy her own party. I do not argue her qualifications, but I do question her integrity and character. Dodd mentioned last week that neither party should go negative. Two days later she throws the "Are your babies safe" ad. Now, Nafta, and has inflamed an issue that seems like a pretty innocent conversation. The sad thing is Obama has not spent time going negative about not disclosing her tax returns to the public.

Byron in CA   March 3rd, 2008 5:42 pm ET

First it never happend, (untill documentation comes out it did) then it happend but not the way they say it did. Can't help but wonder what the next statement from obama will be. He needs to go back to his empty phrases like Change we can believe in instead of dealing with facts.

Wayne   March 3rd, 2008 5:42 pm ET

Why did they use such a sad photo of OBama? There are plenty of photos where he is smiling. CNN..I guess you dont mind bleeding credibility.

Matt   March 3rd, 2008 5:39 pm ET

How can a cheerleader for NAFTA (Clinton) question Obama on this issue ?

Have people in Ohio forgotten that Clinton SUPPORTED NAFTA ?

jc   March 3rd, 2008 5:39 pm ET

And Hillary's complaining about how SHE'S attacked in the press?

Hey, Canada — go back across the border, eh?

Vig   March 3rd, 2008 5:37 pm ET

Oh here we go. First his words were misinterpreted. Now the conversations are being played down. This IS business as usual and not change we can believe in. Obama got a couple of slogans that resonated with the disgusted American people and he's been using these to prove his believability. Let's face it - Americans don't really know what he's really all about.

Puddytat   March 3rd, 2008 5:37 pm ET

I don't know why anybody would be worried about either one of the Dem.s beating McCain. McCain doesn't stand a chance against either one of them.

Republicans ELITES … who drive that campaign … have betrayed the American people too many times to think that they will ever be heard again.

November guarentees a big win for either Hillary OR Obama . That is why Hillary should take this all the way to a Brokered Convention … cause it's a slam dunk for whichever the lucky Dem. nominee is . The people are not going to get behind McCain … they never have and WON'T . For the RICH to cram McCain in the nose of their base was political suicide for the REPUBLICAN PARTY.

After the coronation of McCain , you can stick a fork in them …they are done.

If any of them feel like I do … after the coronation , the channel changes and there will be no news watched until Nov.'s election
when my vote goes to anyone BUT REPUBLICAN … RIGHT DOWN THE THE TICKET.

Dave   March 3rd, 2008 5:32 pm ET

What is that people want from their president. If they want to be uplifted, go to church every Sunday. Otherwise, think of what Obama has done, nothing, nada, zero, other and stood on the podium and made worthless speaches. Look at his voting record since he came to the senate. His voting rocord on Irag is exactly same. Just like every debate, he repeatedly said I agree with Hillary. I just wished Hillary should have let Obama answer the question on the new Russian leader. I think he knows absolutely nothing. I also don't like Obama pulling this strong arm on black politicians to back him. This is a racism at its worst. We let Obama get away with it. I just don't understand why is it that people in this country are so afraid of attacking prominent blacks. Being a president is different from being a preacher. I just want Americans to know that.

RG Torian   March 3rd, 2008 5:32 pm ET

The Canadian government denied any such understanding was made, denied that any official of the campaign had such a meeting. You Obama haters are so blind you can't even read! Obama did nothing wrong, this person was not doing the Obama campaign bidding, he was a private citizen speaking his own mind. You can't hang this on Obama but you can show some integrity and admit that Hillary and her prospective "co-president" husband lied before, during and after his 8 year term as president. We don't need that national nightmare again.

Sonya   March 3rd, 2008 5:32 pm ET

CNN is no longer a reputable source; if you want to be Pro-Clinton then stand in line with Fox News Network and state that you will be supporting Clinton 100% so that the American public is not duped into believing that your network is giving equal coverage.

sunshine in nj   March 3rd, 2008 5:31 pm ET

Hillary Clinton is turning green, with jealousy that is! Not matter what crap she and her campaign "dig up" on Obama, it does nothing to sway voters - too bad!!! She has tried everything, and expects Obama to answer to all this and guess what, he does!!! He never swore that the meeting didn't happen, what he said was that the story that came out was not true (his statement was truthful). Then, when the real story came out, he commented on it. I hope all of you also took note that he did not jump up and down, he didn't get sarcastic, and he didn't cry the blues calling himself a victim. He addressed it and moved on. This is the kind of person who should be president…..not that raging maniac who cannot control herself, her husband, or her campaign (and you want her to be in charge of everyone's business)…..no thanks. Come on Ohio and Texas - FINISH HER OFF! Obama '08

kathleen   March 3rd, 2008 5:31 pm ET

Whatever Obama and Canada have in the initial talks.
I am sure a fair agreement will be met. Obama respects
Canada as we all do and we want to keep them as our
allies. Canada is like part of us.
Obama will make the negotiations palable for both.

CANADA WE LOVE YOU . YOU ARE OUR FRIENDS
OBAMA IS A GOOD FAIR MAN.

I think a lot of what is being said now is exagerated
by our media,

WE do not want 32 years of the Bush's and the Clintons.

OBAMA 2008

Mike   March 3rd, 2008 5:30 pm ET

TO CW in DC,

I wonder how much a state senator in Illinois earns per year? Must be enough to afford a $1.65 million house. Where did Obama get that money?

Independent in Texas   March 3rd, 2008 5:30 pm ET

We have Obama saying that was not what was stated or implied, we have Austan Goolsbee himslef state that was not what he said or implied, and WE HAVE THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT STATING THIS WAS NEVER STATED OR CONVEYED IN ANY WAY. In fact the Canadian government issued a statement dispelling this allegation.

We have Hillary still saying this is an issue and a concern. So many lies by Camp Clinton and so little time left.

Think before you vote   March 3rd, 2008 5:30 pm ET

Of course, the Obama camp must be wondering why ALL the negative stuff about Obama not come later, when the nomination has been clinched. If he is the intelligent person you think he is, then he should realize that ALL DIRT will be uncovered SOONER or later.

If Hillary does not stumble into things like this, then, you can count on McCain digging even deeper, and finding out SO MUCH UNBELIEVABLY MORE. It is tough to be in the public eye, since ALL CLOSETS WILL BE open. If Obama wanted to have closed closets , then you should not have run for office.

Senator Clinton has already undergone that painful process. And , not only did she survive but actually thrived to the dismay of many who think a woman should not be involved in historically male dominated affairs.

Clearly, senator Clinton deserves to be the NEXT president of the United States.

Mike   March 3rd, 2008 5:28 pm ET

Obama's open lie to the American people about NAFTA is shameful. You can chant "Yes we can" a thousand times, but without vision it is nothing more than empty words.

OBAMA / REZKO '08!!!!

arizona for HILLARY   March 3rd, 2008 5:27 pm ET

PEOPLE NEED TO OPEN THEIR EYE'S AND JUST LOOK AT OBAMA.FIRST HE DON'T HAVE A LOOK TO BE A PRESIDENT.MAYBE KENYA NEED A PRESIDENT RIGHT NOW.HE IS SAYING ANYTHING TO GET A VOTES.STOP LYING AND BE HONEST MR.OBAMA.WE HAVE A BUSH WITH NO EXPERIENCE AND SEE WHAT WE GOT.WE DON'T NEED ANOTHER BUSH RIGHT NOW.MAYBE 20 YEARS FROM NOW.WE NEED HILLARY TO FIX THIS MESS.SHE IS THE ONLY ONE WHO CAN FIX ALL THIS.SO I WOULD SUGEST OPEN YOUR EYE'S PEOPLE AND VOTE HILLARY 08.

H I L L A R Y 08.

For all who flunked math   March 3rd, 2008 5:27 pm ET

I just played the CNN delegate game, everyone should try it. If Sen Clinton wins Ohio, Tex, Penn, RI and splits everywhere else by very narrow margins, Sen Obama and Sen Clinton will be virtually tied without the super delegates. So will the Obama people please stop saying Sen Clinton should drop out. Some of us are not caught up in the Obamania, aren't looking to elect a rock star, and are concerned about fabrication, dodging the issues and copy cat rhetoric and should have a chance to vote for our candidate. Both candidates have every right to take the fight to the convention, and we can end up a stronger party by ending up with both on the democratic ticket. Are all you Obama supporters saying if the ticket were Clinton/Obama you would stay home? Or are you going to vote for McCain and whoever he seconds? Not that I think Sen Obama is going to ask Sen Clinton to VP but if the ticket were Obama/Clinton what then?

BAKERSFIELD   March 3rd, 2008 5:26 pm ET

hillary did not write the ap article of course the canadiens will deny and of course obama will deny. i've read it and it contradics what he said. he said no more washington politcs, okay ohio theres your evidence. obama supporters its ok to jump ship

Ochoano   March 3rd, 2008 5:26 pm ET

The liar goes to the rocky mountain states and says: You can keep your guns, he goes to the west coast and says: I am for the environment; he goes to Wisconsin and Ohio and says: I am against NAFTA; he goes to Texas and says I am against the Irak war and I am an immigration reformist. He goes to the south and says: I care for all races and he goes to the east coast and says: I am liberal. The rethoric is really paying off but the question is for how long. I am pretty sure that little by little the illusionist express will derail and the ones left on would be the naive young voters and the well to do liberals. He is trully an opportunist and his campaign people have subtly sold it to the naive to make him a MTV star.

Sharon   March 3rd, 2008 5:17 pm ET

CNN is bias. They need to announce that the Canadian has rejected any such thing with Obama or his people. They put out a statement rejecting this. I saw it on another channel. HOW COME CNN DIDN'T SHOW THIS STATEMENT. HOW UNFAIR? YOU DID SHOW HILLARY TALKIN ABOUT OBAMA AND CANADA, SO SHOW THE STATEMENT DENIEING IT TOO.

GO OBAMA!!!!!!

Bertha   March 3rd, 2008 5:16 pm ET

Hey from Canada! I have been of course watching from the outside, namely from Canada. What I have observed is that Sexism is alive and well in the USA, Racism comes second. As well, the media has been very biased, hence the observation. When is the media going to stop the molly-coddling of Barrack Obama. From my viewpoint, it is the media who has put Mr. Obama on the petestal and has helped him with the Hilary bashing. Mrs. Clinton is a great politician and has done a lot for your people and country. The American people should be honored and proud in having her as President. She would make a Great President not to mention the fact that the Americans would be making history. When was the last time you had a former first lady run for president? I wish I had more space to write. Thanks for you time.

Phil, KC, MO   March 3rd, 2008 5:10 pm ET

How is it that the Clinton campaign is criticizing Obama for his stand on NAFTA? Are our memories so short? Does anyone recall that it was President Clinton who signed NAFTA into law? Is there any evidence to suggest that Hillary opposed NAFTA then? There is certainly plenty of evidence to the contrary. Now they're accusing Obama of taking a stand for political expediency. Definitely a case of the pot calling the kettle black (no racial inference intended).
Aside from the outrageousness of the charge, I'd say this is a non-issue. They're both guilty. Call it a draw.

Nancy   March 3rd, 2008 5:09 pm ET

Cami writes:
Cami March 3rd, 2008 3:34 pm ET

I have truly grown to despise Hillary. I don't want to vote republican, but if she is the nominee I will simply not vote at all.

Cami don't you think that Hillary supporters feel the same way if Obama wins?

Peter   March 3rd, 2008 5:07 pm ET

Hillary's getting lame….and desperate….

Go Obama!

Steven Harper   March 3rd, 2008 5:06 pm ET

Canada owes Bill Clinton a BIG favor.

You see, when Bill was still President, and the french speaking province (ie. State) of Quebec was voting on a referendum about whether to separate from Canada or not, Bill Clinton staged a news conference with planted reporters and questions. Bill basically said the US would not support separation.

So now, Bill was in Canada on Saturday, asking to for a favor in return. Or maybe he was there to tell Canadian officials that Hillary was joking about NAFTA.

Vince   March 3rd, 2008 5:06 pm ET

Who cares what one low level flunkie told another low level flunkie.

THIS, IS THE PROOF OF UNTRUTHFULNESS???

Manuel TX   March 3rd, 2008 5:06 pm ET

Stay strong Hillary!

:)

Rick   March 3rd, 2008 5:06 pm ET

Has anyone noted what either of these 2 are saying about NAFTA in Texas. The answer is Nada, Zip, Zilch. Why? NAFTA happens to be popular in Texas. According the the WSJ (I won't plagerize), 1.6 million jobs have been created in TX in the last 10 years vs. a loss of 10K in Ohio. Exports from TX are 4 times what they are in Ohio. And TX has seen a net domestic migration of 667K vs. a negative 362K in Ohio (ex: foreign immigrants). NAFTA has helped in TX. Also helping in TX is a low tax rate and no personal income tax. Ohio ranks ahead of only 3 states in economic competitivenes - they have the 3rd highest corporate income tax and 4th higher personal income tax in the country.

Seems the argument in OH should be about much more than NAFTA. - but then neither of these 2 are advocating lower overall taxes. So instead, they use NAFTA as a stalking horse for much bigger problems.

Ralph   March 3rd, 2008 5:06 pm ET

The independent voters will be questioning the timing of Obamas bad press and Clintons good press. Amazing how the news turned on a dime after SNL slammed CNN and the next primary approached. Coincidenal? Only if you are not an independent voter. And what's up with all these Clinton supporters saying you go girl? Can you imagine what the response would be to that many Obama fans saying you go brother? Those most vocal about sexism are proving to be hippocrits when it comes to what they want.

KF   March 3rd, 2008 5:06 pm ET

Boo-hoo Obama. I mean let's look at the facts - he said no one ever spoke with the Canadians when in fact they did. More mistakes by a young politician not ready for the white house. She has what it takes to win this nomination and that is what all you Obama supporters are scared of…. well you should be.

Keith, GA   March 3rd, 2008 5:05 pm ET

Obama's toast in OH and TX (if it ever makes the airwaves).

mjc   March 3rd, 2008 5:05 pm ET

deborah, speak for yourself, ITS A TIE.. THAT MEANS HALF OF US WANT HILLARY… WAKE UP.

Matt, Indiana   March 3rd, 2008 5:05 pm ET

WE do not want you Obama.

GO HOME!

Go HILLARY 2008!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ok, seriously people. This is not American Idol. Obama may have that "rock star" appeal because the main stream media has made him out to be some sort of golden boy, but can you all really be that thick? The man is a liar. He's inexperienced and he will do major damage to this country. Remember the last President we had that was inexperienced? I believe you do, his name is George W. Bush. Do we really want another 4 years of Bushism's? Be smart! Get your facts straight and open your eyes or you are going to end up with a bunch of broken promises if Obama ever ends up as President.

Another thing, most of Obama's wins are coming from Republicans who no longer have to vote for McCain since he has all be wrapped up the nomination. They are doing this knowing that Obama is the weaker choice and that there is no chance in hell they will vote for him in November. They don't want Hillary to win because they know she is the only one who has a chance to beat their "McOldy".

So say NObama and YES to Hillary!

VOTE HILLARY!!!!!! The only candidate who can bring about REAL change that this country needs!! Not empty rhetoric like Obama. He needs to drop out of the race ASAP so the Democrats can put their focus on Hillary defeating McCain in November.

GO HILLARY GO!!!!

zak   March 3rd, 2008 5:05 pm ET

I was undecided until this latest attack from Hillary's camp. I have just decided to vote for Obama. He could throw so much garbage at her, but he doesn't and she slings mud daily and it's sickening. She is turning a lot of people off by this, but she doesn't have a clue. I think the country is sick and tired of this kind of cheap politics, called the Clintons. By the way the Candian government was on tv and has denied this attack by Hillary and her arm waving ridiculous tactics. I think the American people from Texas and Ohio are going to send a loud message to Hillary Clinton tomorrow and I don't think she's gonna like it. I know I am.

Go Away   March 3rd, 2008 5:05 pm ET

Yeah right, show your daughters what they can be:
liars, sleazy, shrill, plastic, angry, psycotic, condescending,
need I go on about Billary?

Rudy F.   March 3rd, 2008 5:05 pm ET

Can ONN (Obama News Network), I mean CNN, bury this story more? This is relevant news that says a lot about the true nature of the Obama campaign.

Rudy F. (California)

joyo   March 3rd, 2008 5:04 pm ET

well even clinton said the media has to help her win we all know cnn is clinton news network, i am sick of all the cable stations,they admitted they need to help her investigate obama last i checked it's not the media's job i thought they were supposed to just tell the news please can we get a national public station besides cspan

Abe   March 3rd, 2008 5:04 pm ET

FInally people will see he is a politician like everyone else and says stuff just to win points. If this had been Hillary people would have been going nuts over this but with Obama we will just let him tell us what he ment to say. At three in the morning you dont get a second chance to explain.

VOTE HILLARY

CHANGE+Experience

p.s isn't he calling the Canadians liers?

Canadian   March 3rd, 2008 5:04 pm ET

Come on you coward. You can blame a lot on Hillary, but for once be a man and admit, we cant really trust what you're saying because its just politics as usual right Obama.

We do NOT want you to be out President.

Vote for Hillary.

pat   March 3rd, 2008 5:03 pm ET

The "MEMO" is a lie… People, wake up to smell the coffee. Words do not matter. No proof it is real. Obama's fingerprints are not on it,

Mani, NJ   March 3rd, 2008 5:02 pm ET

This is not a popularity contest, its a crucial election that is going to decide our future and our children's future. If we Americans actually thought of it this way, we would not even give Obama the time of day. He is a nobody with no ideas for this country. Yes, he is cool and witty but he is not suited to be our president. Hillary will do just as Bill did, she will clean up the mess in this country. She is only in this election because she cares about this country otherwise she really does not need the crap she gets from everyone.

Go Away   March 3rd, 2008 5:02 pm ET

WE DON'T WANT YOU HILLARY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

JJ   March 3rd, 2008 5:02 pm ET

Leave Hillary out of it… "Obama Cult Members" …You are starting to see the real Obama! SCARY!!!

Mimi, CA   March 3rd, 2008 5:02 pm ET

Direct mails are funny now, aren't they?
Obama 2108

mjc   March 3rd, 2008 5:01 pm ET

sounds like a ROOKIE MISTAKE.. something we could expect MANY of if he gets nomination and presidency. he thinks he can say nothing wrong, his words are golden.. reality check mr. obama. why don't YOU drop out.

BSC   March 3rd, 2008 5:01 pm ET

This is a true story. Also, this is why people should be thinking twice about Obama. He is not ready to lead this great country.

Eli   March 3rd, 2008 5:01 pm ET

We can argue back and forth about this NAFTA thing and neither side can say what truely happened, but the TRUE FACT that can not be wrong is that OBAMA said at first he pr his campaign had not spoken with them (he denied this several times). Now we find out he did speak with them but they misunderstood him.

Barney, Long Island   March 3rd, 2008 5:00 pm ET

Texas, Ohio, Rhode Island: Don't trust this guy and fall for his phoney baloney speeches. Vermont fits in with Obamamania..You people are too smart to fall for his tactics.

Bill   March 3rd, 2008 5:00 pm ET

By the way, MSNBC has reported that the Canadian Parliment was arguing about this issue today, not denying that the meeting took place.

The point is, Obama said one thing to voters, why his top adviser on this issue is telling another government something else. This is not the kind of politics we need.

steve   March 3rd, 2008 5:00 pm ET

Deborah,

We want Hillary, all of us, all of us who have voted and will vote for her tomorrow.

Clinton won 8,558,402 votes in the first 25 Democratic primaries, 229,220 more than Illinois Senator Barack Obama. Of the total votes cast for the two Democratic leaders, Clinton had 50.7 percent and Obama 49.3 percent, acording the the polls.

JP SW   March 3rd, 2008 5:00 pm ET

It will too late to have buyer's remorse after the details the Feds have on Obama come out.

Don't stick your head in the sand and deny what the memo said was true when Obama's adviser met with officials in Canada. Canada does not want an incident because that memo was released and they are taking the heat. It's true and the meeting was recorded.

Hillary Clinton for President!

Bebe   March 3rd, 2008 4:59 pm ET

OBAMA campt did not downplay this issue . It was denied by him and the Canadian Government. It would be nice if CNN could report the news accurately fro Obama as it does for Hillary Clinton. It is the most biased network for political news. All for Clinton. Only negative news is reported againand agin on Obama but CLinton just gets a blip on the negatives and the repetition on the positves if there is any at aall.

John Clinton   March 3rd, 2008 4:59 pm ET

That Canadian official was a PLANT! That was a PLANTED question.

Just like in Iowa and Wisconsin!

Don't trust anything from the Clintons.

As well, get the facts straight. Clinton is using a candid conversation during University tour visit as a silver bullet.

Sharon Moody SC   March 3rd, 2008 4:55 pm ET

It's amazing how when Hillary cried fowl blaming the media for what she considered unfair coverage how quickly they responded and the old "dump truck" effect backed right in on Senator OBama. Ironically or strategically, which I personally believe, in the final hours of Super Tuesday 2. How about showing the video that show Canadian Governemnt Officials angrily denying allegations tied to this so called memoand taking a firm stance on the culprit that started all these rumors against Senator OBama. This would at least let American's see both sides of the story but of course that would be too much like right. How about the media get back to being fair and impartial and please media personnel stop campaigning for Hillary Clinton.

Bill   March 3rd, 2008 4:54 pm ET

No one who supports Clinton is confused here. No one has said Obama met with these officials. The problem here is that when asked Obama and his campaign denied this ever happened. Now that its come to light, they are saying it did happen, but we are misunderstanding. So, its one or the other. The problem is it now shows that you can not trust Obama 100%..They could have admitted last week, but knew that would harm him, especially since Obama was busy attacking Clinton on NAFTA.
The issue here is he could have told the truth last week. NEW POLITICS. HE did not. Change we can not believe in, because its buisness as usual.

Ron   March 3rd, 2008 4:54 pm ET

I ask everyone who reads this..HAVE YOU EVER BEEN IN A ROOM WITH 4 OTHER PEOPLE WHEN SOMETHING IS DISCUSSED, AND WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT IT LATER, EVERYBODY HAS A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT INTERPETATION OF WHAT WAS DISCUSSED??? Frankly it was kind of dumb for both Hillary and Barack to say they would consider dropping out of NAFTA. They both know AIN'T NO WAY it is going to happen!!! There may be a little tweaking, but the U.S. will not withdraw from it completey, no matter who is the President.

Eyes Wide Open   March 3rd, 2008 4:54 pm ET

Yeah, show what your daughters can be…. HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

smart grrl in ls mo   March 3rd, 2008 4:54 pm ET

just a little more of OBAMA's inexperience showing….

Black Female Voter....   March 3rd, 2008 4:53 pm ET

I am NOT voting for Obama, he makes me puke! I am not going to be pressured into voting for him just because he has brown skin! He is patronizing the Black Community by impersonating a Black Preacher, he's not, so why does he give sermons? What a croc of crap! What happened to separation of Church and State? This guy doesn't know anything about being Black or White for that matter….How can this country even consider him?

If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything and I'm not falling for Obama!

Vote for Hillary! She’s our only hope!

snnn   March 3rd, 2008 4:53 pm ET

the guerillas FARC in Colombia are looking foward for Obama, after the army in Colombia killed No2 from FARC they found letters mentioning the possible door opening an emisary from Ecuador mentioned in a secret meeting INTERESTING Ah.

Dave, Evergreen CO   March 3rd, 2008 4:51 pm ET

non-issue

KE   March 3rd, 2008 4:50 pm ET

Sens. Feinstein was on Fox news yesterday speaking up for Hillary. Very good.

It is sad that at this stage of this election year crdibility of the candidate is still a major issue. Let's move on! Hillary is the future.

Larry, GA   March 3rd, 2008 4:50 pm ET

This really only helps Sen. John McCain. Many people already believe that Sen. Hillary Clinton is a proven liar (tried and true, proven and tested). If they start to believe that Sen. Barack Obama is one as well, it will only help the Republicans.

Krissy   March 3rd, 2008 4:50 pm ET

Hillary is so desperate! The confusion has been cleared up by Canadian officials. She lives in the mud, and wants to bring the whole country into the mess with her.

OBAMA 08!

Spirit of America   March 3rd, 2008 4:49 pm ET

OHIO, are you listening? The truth may be late, but it is still liberating. Why vote for anyone who supports legislation which cost Ohio tens of thousands of good jobs? Don't fall into the abyss tomorrow. Don't promote hypocrisy and NAFTA. Help make Ohio (and America) beautiful again. Put a woman, the only one who really opposes NAFTA, in the White House.

steve   March 3rd, 2008 4:49 pm ET

knew this all along- Obama is deceptive. Worst than a liar.
I can believe Americans can be fooled by this guy.

The truth will set us free. Obama can run but he can’t hide

Todd   March 3rd, 2008 4:47 pm ET

The Canadian government has abosolutely confirmed this meeting through their memo–some people posted here that they were denying it those people are mistaken. Obama did this and must be held responsible.

Martin   March 3rd, 2008 4:47 pm ET

Ok, so you are racist if you say anything about Obama. What about black people demanding that other blacks vote for Obama. This should be about the issues not black and white. If it was the other way around and Clinton supporters were saying "All white people should vote for Clinton, because this is our time," people would freak out. Obama lied, got caught, and then blamed it on Clinton.

Jack   March 3rd, 2008 4:45 pm ET

It's a disgrace that CNN is reporting so heavily on these two stories today — both of these stories, the Canadian thing and the Rezko thing — are weeks old.

Shame on you, CNN.

Penny Libby - Micco Florida   March 3rd, 2008 4:45 pm ET

Barack Obama is basing his campaign on judgement. His judgement was wrong on this issue and it was wrong on Rezko. Sen. Obama admits he made a mistake in his dealing with Tony Rezko.

What is there to say about that other than his judgement is not quite as squeaky clean as he claims. He needs to tell the truth about NAFTA and his land dealing with Rezko. THis is not last minute distractions … he is holding up his campaign with Judgement. HMMM!

Donna   March 3rd, 2008 4:45 pm ET

The Obama supporter need to wake up! Hillary did not put this out. Obama got caught and now as usual is trying to swim his way out. The guy is a horrible liar!

Hillary is the best choice for president!

SH   March 3rd, 2008 4:45 pm ET

Canadian news media reported on this when it happened, go look it up.

GetReal   March 3rd, 2008 4:44 pm ET

Senator Obama is back peddling again just like on campaign financing!!

Todd   March 3rd, 2008 4:44 pm ET

This is the most incredible outrage. The press needs to really look into this, because it WAS an important person in Obama's campaign who spoke to the Canadian consulate, and he DID tell them a very different thing than he's been telling voters.

OBAMA CANNOT BE TRUSTED.

Mike   March 3rd, 2008 4:44 pm ET

These posts are pointless, it's just people who support one or the other spewing garbage.

Belle   March 3rd, 2008 4:44 pm ET

HEY CNN!!!!!!!!

You HAVE BEEN REPORTING FOR WEEKS THAT NEITHER DEMOCRAT CAN GET ENOUGH DELEGATES TO WIN!!!!!!!!

However, If Clinton loses Texas by a few delegates, but WINS OHIO and Pennyslvania….THIS IS A DIFFERENT BALLGAME!!!!!!!!!

Plant   March 3rd, 2008 4:43 pm ET

The Canadian official was a PLANT! That was a PLANTED question.

Just like in Iowa and Wisconsin!

Don't trust anything from the Clintons.

Y.Lee   March 3rd, 2008 4:43 pm ET

Could you guys at CNN stop with the strong adjectives on your political headlines? SLAMS BLASTS HAMMERS, this is stupid. They are overused "descriptions' that have lost their definition in the political arena. You guys study English for a living, why don't you use it?

MJ   March 3rd, 2008 4:42 pm ET

What about the release from Canada saying it was their mistake?

Jed in Texas   March 3rd, 2008 4:42 pm ET

And you didnt believe Dennis or Ron Paul when they said you will be lied to and often by Hillary,Obama and McCain.

Switcher   March 3rd, 2008 4:40 pm ET

I SWITCHED TO HILLARY a long time ago. Come join me!

Reggy   March 3rd, 2008 4:39 pm ET

People! This is only an attempt by Hillary to get the NAFTA subject off of her. Her support of NAFTA was exposed by Obama and now she is crying like a baby and acting like a kid. Why when something negative comes out it has Hillarys name wrote on it. I might as well call Hillary supporters a bunch of BATS, because you people are blind. So since you are blind direct your RADAR to voting for Obama.

Go Obama

gozinct   March 3rd, 2008 4:38 pm ET

You can either support Clinton or Obama, or McCain for that matter, but please do not use the tidbits of vile that each campaign has dispensed for your arguments. Have you forgotten that all politicians will lie to get what they want? Hundreds of millions of dollars have been spent to get our votes. That fact is the only thing that gives me hope that average Americans may have a say about the uncertain future. They need us! Let us use our collective voice to push issues on which we can all agree: education, economy, good jobs, health care, peace, and security. In recent elections divisive issue like abortion and gay rights have confused large blocks of voters. These are two issues that, not unlike the Clinton/Obama debate going on here, cannot be settled. When all is said and done we will vote for the person who will do the best for us individually. That may mean different things to different people, but please let us just (as the song says) accentuate the positive and eliminate the negative. That will make us all feel better when the race has ended.

Deborah   March 3rd, 2008 4:38 pm ET

WE do not want you Hillary

GO HOME

Go OBAMA 2008!!!!!!

HG   March 3rd, 2008 4:38 pm ET

BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO-what horrible coverage by CNN, look at this ticker almost every article is related to Clinton. I can see why Bill Cunningham called it the ClintonNewsNetwork.

CNN WATCHER   March 3rd, 2008 4:38 pm ET

This is a major gaffe by Obama. It shows that he is all words an empty suit and will say anything to get elected. It goes to the heart of his character and shows that at the heart he is just another dishonest politician. Worse thatn that he is a politician that lacks any expereince and has dupped many people. He had it right in his debate when he characterized his supporters as dillusional. He has deluded them into thinking that hi is honest and or capable. Obama is nether. Please put an end to this campaign Texas, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Vermont, and vote for Hillary Clinton. As much as her detractors discredit her she is a tough and capable women. Men stop voting against her becasue she is a women . It is time to have a female president and HRC is more then capable. Women you may not get another chance to vote for a female presidental candidate i your lifetime. HRC is cabable and qualified. Please men and women do not be afraid of a strong women. She is a great role model for the YOUNG WOMEN of America. Dad's who have daughters show your daughters that a girl can be anything that she wants to be in this country. What greater shining light can we be for the Taliban who discriminate against woemn. Lets role lets do it!

Sharon, Raleigh NC   March 3rd, 2008 4:38 pm ET

I have never in my lifetime seen such blind allegiance to a person, particulary a POLITICAN.

I don't beleive Hillary Clinton's campaign had anything to do with the Obama campaign talking to the Canadians about NAFTA. Let's take Hillary out of this story and Obama supporters just THINK at least for ten seconds that Obama is not this perfect individual sent her from above to save us and that some things that comes from his campaing and his mouth is not always 100% true.

If he wins the nomination and his "policy flip flops" and his "Chicago dealings" come out who will you blame then?

pat   March 3rd, 2008 4:37 pm ET

It is only a matter of time before Barack Obama faces a comedown after the emotion he's "inspired" in the U.S. presidential nomination race.
Soon he Will Have Nowhere to Go But Down, if not against Hillary but certainly against MaCain.

At some point his free ride wil end,just like any other "superstar".

Obama, you cannot be elected president if you do not withstand the tough questions, how long are you are going to pretend no to know about Rezko?, to double talk to get out of tough questions? , to use the race card?

Obama you already fooled the people you were going to fool. Supporters are starting to suffer from the Obama Comedown Syndrome, and are starting to ask questions, such as, tell us your plans to deliver on sweeping promises to unite the country, bridge the racial divide and break the partisan logjam in the U.S. capital?; an so far Obama has been mute about specifics. Why?

Eunice, Maryland   March 3rd, 2008 4:37 pm ET

Down playing real issues is typical of Obama style. He hates it whenever the truth comes out about him. Once again he has lied to American people. Obama is two faced. He will tell voters anything to get their vote. I am an African woman living in America but I feel very sorry for America if this man wins election.

Wake up America.

Teresa   March 3rd, 2008 4:37 pm ET

I just read the Canadian article for this comment and I must say Hillary has a lot of apologies to make first to the Canadians, the Obama campaign, and to the trusted voters who voted for her. If she does stuff like this to incriminate others, I could imagine what she'll do in office. This little fiasco just lost her thousand of votes. Not only did she embarrased herself but the people that endorsed her. Not to mention this may create a national incident over just words.

Toyin, Marietta, GA   March 3rd, 2008 4:36 pm ET

so if one of Clinton's adviser make i comment, i should hold her responsible for it? Basically some are saying don't vote for Obama because his advisor said something.

Joe   March 3rd, 2008 4:36 pm ET

Obama has been Mr. Flawless. Of course we're told since childhood, "If it seems too good to be true, it's too good to be true." A vote for Obama is a wasted vote.

Hillary '08!

Annamica, OH   March 3rd, 2008 4:36 pm ET

Finally, the media has showed some backbone. Obama lied to you Ohio, stick with Hillary!

Democrat08   March 3rd, 2008 4:36 pm ET

Sen. Durbin just went on television and said that there was no meeting. The Obama campaign needs to get its talking points straight.

mike   March 3rd, 2008 4:36 pm ET

Look who got caught with his pants pulled down. Just shows his lack of experience and now he is blatantly lying about it. All politicians are the same. Obama is no Messiah, and like it or not Clinton is tougher. She is the best candidate to get in the ring and slug it out with the republicans. That's what it will take to beat McCaine.

kaylee   March 3rd, 2008 4:36 pm ET

Don't give a CANADIAN official this much power.
OHIO and Texas please vote Obama!

Thsi should be rejected by voters for a Canadian politician, with an unknown agenda, interject himself in our presidential election. He probably wants a pro-NAFTA candidate (not Obama) to win the elections.

Obama '08

Alice Rea   March 3rd, 2008 4:36 pm ET

Hillary will beat McCain if this is the case.
Obama is too weak of a candidate in debates and one one one.

Too many unknowns about Obama before the election in November to take the risk.

Jenny from IN   March 3rd, 2008 4:36 pm ET

Wow… all I see on here is the desperation of the Clinton camp and her supporters.

I guess you'll spin everything you hear into something that isn't true to get Hillary elected.

Much like Hillary herself, it's sleezy.

He didn't have a meeting with the Canadians. It was informal. The Hillary camp has pushed lies before to try and get elected.

Hillary is LUCKY Obama is enough of a competitor to not have to dig up ALL THE NUMEROUS SKELETONS IN HER CLOSET.

Obama '08

Eli   March 3rd, 2008 4:35 pm ET

CLINTON going negative again because she has pointed out another Obama lie. Obama the golden boy getting a little bronze. Keep on and before long he will be just dirty, like his good friend(you know the indicted one, the one that sold OBAMA his home for 300,000.00 below value and on the same day paid full price for the one next door for himself) HILLARY08

Kshama   March 3rd, 2008 4:35 pm ET

Fact Check:

The Canadian news channel released the details after the Obama camp denied any such conversation took place. Now the story by the Obama camp is that the conversation took place but there seems to have been some miscommunication? Then, the Obama camp accuses Hillary Clinton of deceitful tactics and says this is her campaign's way of throwing the kitchen sink>.

HMMMM.. Everything that happens to Obama is Senator Hillary Clinton's fault. Well, I know folks it's hard tobelieve, but we actually have an "angel" in Obama amongst all of us "corrupted" citizens.

Texas Terry   March 3rd, 2008 4:35 pm ET

I really like that Obama is serious looking in the picture accompanying this article…… As if he is not as "full of himself" when someone from his campaign at a crucial time has done something stupid. I've heard a lot of things that have come out recently now that many are searching for "things that are not right with Obama's campaign". If you have your ears and eyes open maybe some of this will sink in and you will realize Obama is not the candidate you thought he was.

Clinton for President!

Ian   March 3rd, 2008 4:34 pm ET

Just goes to show that Obama will make an excellent president. He's got the duck and move maneuver down pat. I guess his idea of changes is just telling a new set of lies.

Chuck   March 3rd, 2008 4:34 pm ET

Wow, Obama is starting to fall, and he is not dealing with it well. I give him a month before the MSM turns on him.

frank   March 3rd, 2008 4:34 pm ET

once again obama supporters…. this shows what kind of phony obama is… he is blinding you all with is speeches of change.. as it turns out it is barack obama will who will say anything to get elected…..

justin   March 3rd, 2008 4:34 pm ET

Everyone needs to realize that cnn,nbc,msnbc, and every network has nothing to talk about for 24hrs. lets get the facts right! An obama official was walking on a tour and having a conversation. The conversation and supposed memo said "he (obama) was not in any way saying that he would completely remove Canada from trade agreements,so Canada need not be concerned about news reports of his trade policy because there have not been any meetings to discuss so yes in fact it is politcal talk, because neither candidate can meet with Canada and do anything"

all of you sheepish people who watch the tv tube and find something from Hilary to bait you into, maybe you should stop and wait to see how quickly hillary is "honored" to be with Obama after he wins the nomination and all of a sudden she is on board witht he democratic party. its called the kitchen sink. Obama has a lot of 'supposeds" but he has not been tied with anything but talks from rezco,canada,maybes with louise farrakhan and ect. I mean dang, what else did he supposed do? he was a muslim, an anti-christ ect. just admit you dont like the black man and we can get past the "silly season"

OBAMA 08

Chinese Lobbyist   March 3rd, 2008 4:34 pm ET

The Clinton's have been nice to China. Good trade and military policies. Please re-elect Hillary so that we continue to make *affordable* products for US and so that our military can grow to match yours.

Vote Hillary

ray c. N.S. Canada   March 3rd, 2008 4:34 pm ET

The democratic race for nominee has been exciting for Canadians at most all levels. I wish to add only to this blog that those who resort to fear, can only do so by actually circumventing truth and righteousness. For the two cannot mix. If any one candidate stands out in such a manner, one must consider where the root of their deliverance is coming. One will not make sound or righteous decisions if they are grounded in a manner such as fear. If fear should be used successfully, what would incline you to think this tactic will not be used again, when pushed? Wisdom and prudence is seldom availed by such tactics.

Bill   March 3rd, 2008 4:34 pm ET

I can not believe the comments I am hearing from the Obama supporters.

Take credit when you guys do something, but denial when something like this comes out. How does this become Hillary's fault. Obama attacked her on NAFTA and then lied about this memo. For those of you claiming its not true, you must not be watching the news because everyone is covering it and it is true. Point is that Obama people met, then Obama and his campaign lied. Of course they are backing off this now. Also, how does this make CNN racist? If someone lies it does not matter what color they are.

There are many questions out there. This started a week ago and they tried to cover their butts and failed. It seems that while our press has had a love affair, not everyone has.

You have to ask yourself was all the speeches just a ploy to get your vote. Obama supporters, be big enough to admit that your man can be wrong. How about his campaign and supporters threatening black delegates for Clinton? This is not right either.

Hillary Clinton has never been charged with any crime. There has never been any evidence that she has ever done anything wrong. You can write about old scandals all day, but they are all gossip and not real. This is real. The memo states clearly that Obama was poltical positioning on NAFTA. Can you trust that nothing else has a political spin from this campaign.

We need real leadership. Obama is not ready and Hillary Clinton is.

Hillary 08

Brian   March 3rd, 2008 4:34 pm ET

Hillary Clinton flat out sucks. If she gets the nomination, this party will be in ruins.

Krishna & Ranga   March 3rd, 2008 4:33 pm ET

Folks consider this. Obama says he did not know what his adviser was telling the Canadian official. How are we to trust his judgement as President when he is not aware of what is happening around him much less what is happening in this wide world.

ALEX MORALES   March 3rd, 2008 4:33 pm ET

TEXAS FOR HILLARY! Obama uses words to win votes, his lying came through this time and was proved. The guy is a great guy, but its not so gret to decieve people simply because you want to win the election. We can't afford to just "hope" …there is hope in everyone…we are not in the luxury with the problems we face…to put someone in office and hope. We need a track record and a strong candidate. WAKE UP and VOTE HILARAY!

Kirby Lafayette La.   March 3rd, 2008 4:33 pm ET

Hey cali indie, look @ your state's condition, now imagine it getting much worse if Mcain or clinton gets into office. African americans are used to bad economy dealings , job loss , & all other hardships. So those of you who are hurting due to mindless politicians keep voting the way you are and find yourself stuck in another rut for 4 more years. One would think you all learned a valuable lesson over the last 8 years. Geniuses.

Kate   March 3rd, 2008 4:33 pm ET

THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY WILL BE DONE AGAIN AFTER THE CLINTONS HAVE HAD THEIR WAY WITH IT ..

Mike   March 3rd, 2008 4:33 pm ET

It will be such a joy to have so much space on this threat that's not filled with Obama supprorters aka "cry babies…"

So naive.

Come March 4th, Hillary will once again prove that she is the "come back kid."

Hillary 08!

Stewie   March 3rd, 2008 4:33 pm ET

I don't understand ANY of the Clinton supporters.

These words about NAFTA by Obama's economic advisor are a CHARACTERIZATION, almost word of mouth, and they were never uttered by the candidate himself.

What Clinton supporters forget is that Clinton DID support NAFTA many, many times, and that Obama himself confronted her during the debate and all we heard from her were excuses and crickets.

She should not open her mouth to accuse him now. She will continue to portray herself as a hypocrite of the grandest kind.

This is all part of her desperate strategy to revive her moribund campaign. To quote her: SHAME ON YOU, HILLARY!

Martha   March 3rd, 2008 4:33 pm ET

I have a slight feeling that this may not get published by CNN (Clinton News Network) but you all need to tune in the most recent news, it seems like you are following the issues from behind and in news media nano-second matters. Canadian government is flatly denying this. Tune in then let's talk again. Hillary is going down, poor freak!

LatinoNation   March 3rd, 2008 4:33 pm ET

So let me get this straight that if a person hustles you this is its ok? and you would allow that person to sell your soul just to be right? wow !

jess   March 3rd, 2008 4:32 pm ET

I know your game CNN

you want this thing to continue until the convention.

This allegation was already proven false.

This is my last post.

Don't swallow the press.

I am done with your network

RT   March 3rd, 2008 4:32 pm ET

CNN your headlines are false and misleading!!

Herman   March 3rd, 2008 4:32 pm ET

Again, just smoke and mirrors to distract the voters from the real issues at hand which is the war and economy and in this country. Same old tactics that will not work this time because the people are focus on the real issues at hand.

I to will vote for McCain if Billary wins…

One lady told me that if Hillary wins she is moving to Australia….

Go Obama!!!!

ww-New York   March 3rd, 2008 4:32 pm ET

How funny! Hillary cries and the media, change their focus off her "do anything" motto! UNREAL.. How quickly people forget how the Clintons have lied and still will do anything! I can't stand this. I'm so sick of the Clintons. Let's discuss the case "HILLARY" is involved in. All the news about Obama doesn't have proof. However "Hillary" is a part of a case!

Mark, Newfoundland, Canada   March 3rd, 2008 4:32 pm ET

I hope someone else has said it here too but neither of the two of them have any intention of renegotiating NAFTA. They are both just acting like they would to please voters in Ohio. Neither of the two of them want to renegotiate NAFTA because NAFTA helps the rich and the rich pay for these people to get elected.

Get real. Both of them are liars just like every other politician in your country and my country and any country in the G8. I really hope someday you all will see that and unite behind a real cause, that real cause being, humanity. As opposed to right now, we the right and the left are too busy arguing with each other but unimportant issues like abortion, gay rights, Iraq, terrorism, when they should be focusing on the economy, education and health care and actually trying to get control of your goverment back from the corporations.

What scares me is that it may be too late and you all better pray to whatever God you believe in because the big empire is about to fall and it is going to get nasty and make the great depression look like the best economic times ever.

We need a revolution before we are all poor slaves to the rich elite or before we are all dead from starvation and disease.

And remember, all empires fall, all of them. History as always showed us that.

Jayson   March 3rd, 2008 4:32 pm ET

He should speak to someone in Canada and ask why they are moving away from such a "fine" government healthcare program….

ALEX MORALES   March 3rd, 2008 4:32 pm ET

Obama uses words to win votes, his lying came through this time and was proved. The guy is a great guy, but its not so gret to decieve people simply because you want to win the election. We can't afford to just "hope" …there is hope in everyone…we are not in the luxury with the problems we face…to put someone in office and hope. We need a track record and a strong candidate. WAKE UP and VOTE HILARAY!

alison   March 3rd, 2008 4:31 pm ET

why doesn't CNN show the Canadian Parliament today - the actual members of Parliment are getting up to speal and each speaker is supporting Sen Obama's story and saying this is being engineered through the government of Canada and there is no truth to this story

and why isn't CNN reporting on the fact that Bill Clinton was in Canada Saturday night ?

And who is Brenda Stronach - a minister in Canada and her connection to Bill Clinton

PEOPLE - THIS IS DIRTY TRICKS 101–

Please–

smart grrl in ls mo   March 3rd, 2008 4:31 pm ET

The OBAMA campaign will say ANYTHING…. and later they're going to be telling others that it was only for CAMPAIGNING purposes

vl   March 3rd, 2008 4:31 pm ET

Oh boy, this truly shows just how hypocritical Obama is. HE started the negative attack ads (with untrue information), HE COPIED her "red phone" ad, so what does this show me about him? HE'S A "COPY CAT".

Barack, GET OVER IRAQ!!! Give us something NEW to hear. Your stance on NAFTA is false as well. I believe millions of Americans have heard David Gergen, DeeDee Myers and many others state "Hillary DID OPPOSE NAFTA while her husband was President." I'm sorry if your "followers" can't understand the fact that it would be using poor judgement for the "First Lady" to openly disagree with her husband, the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES! Get real, get an education! Also, I have done research on the CTV, both online and with friends who live in Canada. They tell me it is true what was reported, Obama was just giving lip service to Ohio voters.

What about Obama's pal, Rezco? I for one wish CNN would have done some reporting on this a long time ago.

What about Oprah stating kids in the US are spoiled? Then standing on the stage in Iowa to state "We as black people need to stand behind this black man", that isn't racist?

I could go on, like forever, but I feel like I'm gonna barf from all the Hillary bashing, uneducated (can't spell and rotten grammar) Rev. Jim Jones style (Don't know who he is? LOOK IT UP!) Obama groupies out there! At least Clinton supporters don't swear, and spew hateful, "words" from their mouths or posts

Sacha   March 3rd, 2008 4:30 pm ET

I'm reading this from the other side of the Atlantic, and this does seem like a mountain out of a mole hill. The Canadians deny anything dodgy really happened, Clinton is running round like a rabid dog trying to get a bite, and Obama is getting flack for something a junior advisor might have said.

All seems a bit strange

Alice Rea   March 3rd, 2008 4:30 pm ET

Wake up America!

Isn't it better to find out All about our candidates before we vote?

Thank you CNN

Kenneth Matthews   March 3rd, 2008 4:30 pm ET

I am watching MSNBC and they are showing a clip where the Canadian Legislature is denying the information given in the letter. They continue to show the clip, but on CNN I do not see it. More of the Bias News

don from Canada   March 3rd, 2008 4:29 pm ET

The real fact that the Canadian news (CTV) reported was that the Clinton and Obama camps both met with the Canadian government to tell them that they were talking tough on NAFTA but that this was more political positioning than substance so you should report the whole story. Clinton is just as guilty in this as Obama. Also one note: the current Canadian government has strong ties with the Bush/Republican government and this makes me wonder if they released this to hurt Obama's campaign because Obama has the only real chance to beat McCain in November? This is just a thought!