March 5, 2008
Posted: 11:00 AM ET
 Obama is challenging Clinton's claim of experience.
Obama is challenging Clinton's claim of experience.

(CNN) – Fresh off defeats in Ohio, Texas, and Rhode Island, Barack Obama signaled Wednesday he will be more aggressive in targeting Hillary Clinton's claim she is the more experienced candidate.

"I think that this week she made a series of arguments about why she would be a superior candidate," he told reporters in San Antonio. "She made the experience argument that she’s been making repeatedly, particularly around foreign policy and her ability to handle a crisis."

"I think it’s important to examine that claim and not just allow her to assert it, which I think has been going on for quite some time. She has made the argument that she is thoroughly vetted in contrast to me. I think its important to examine that argument."

Clinton sharply questioned Obama's readiness to be president in the closing days before Tuesday's primaries, repeatedly asserting on the campaign trail his candidacy is based solely on his initial opposition to the Iraq war. She also launched a tough ad in Texas that suggested the Illinois senator isn't equipped to handle a foreign policy crisis. Exit polls in both Texas and Ohio showed voters overwhelmingly gave the nod to Clinton when asked which candidate is better prepared to be commander-in-chief.

"One of the things that I hope people start asking is what exactly is this foreign experience that shes claiming?" Obama added. "I know she talks about visiting 80 countries. Its not clear…was she negotiating treaties or agreements or was she handling crises during this period of time? My sense is the answer is 'no.'"

"I have not seen any evidence that she is better equipped to handle a crisis. If the only criteria is longevity in Washington then she's certainly not going to beat John McCain on that."

– CNN's Chris Welch and Alexander Mooney contributed to this report

Filed under: Barack Obama • Hillary Clinton


Derrick   March 5th, 2008 1:50 pm ET

With Hillary's arguments for experience it's hard to tell where Bill's experience ends. Is she suggesting that she and her man are one? How feminist is that?

gene   March 5th, 2008 1:49 pm ET

You poor obama supporters, when you try to claim all this expeience , and try to say that it exceeds Hillarty's expeience, what planet have you been living on? If you mean that eight years in the U.S.Senate and now chair person on the Armed service committee and eight years as First Lady, equals Illinois senate, working in the gheeto on poverty issues and two years as a U.S. Senator, of which he has been running for President for 1 year, comes even near to her experience. She has visited 80 nations and knows many of the current head of states. I think she will release her tax returns earlier, as she would do that for the general election, but I also think that Obama should release all of his letters to an from Rezko, his appointment bboks, list of number of meetings he had with Rezko, with time and date along with purpose, dates of time of meeting with Rezko and his wife in regard to the purchase of the $ 1,900,000 house and later purchase of a portion of the adjoining lot from Tezko's wife, a list of the companies involved with the three state pension boards and the $ 300,000 in contributions. So let the records and the tax returns be released.

Devaan   March 5th, 2008 1:49 pm ET

Wake up and smell the coffee folks! Hello…Hillary is not genuine. She is extremely vain and simply wants to go down as the first female president. She is so conceited with little regards for people and has demonstrated this during her debates. She has also demonstrated a shameless lack of originality both in her speeches and ideas, yet the media overlooks this. Even those who can see through her are just not speaking up, and Barrack is too much of a gentleman. For me, it's nothing personal, it's just what she's shown me over these months. I beleive someone's personality says a lot about what you can expect from them, and I will be only too happy to give examples if called upon.

Devaan,
New Jersey

Dote'   March 5th, 2008 1:49 pm ET

You go Hillary!!!!!!!!!!!!! Keep doing it . You fought a good fight and you won.

ken   March 5th, 2008 1:49 pm ET

Lets see Obama's and his country loving wifes tax returns also

Yvonne   March 5th, 2008 1:49 pm ET

I think we can all thank Rush Limbaugh for Clinton’s win last night. Republicans crossed over to keep the feud going within the Democratic Party. For once, the two Democratic candidates need to take the high rode and keep their eyes on the November election. Why don’t they just combine forces and call it a day. If we don’t wake up, we will be dealing with McCain for the next 4-8 years. God Help Us All!

ferris_b   March 5th, 2008 1:49 pm ET

There are several claims that Barack has gone negative… I must be failing to see it in the above article. He is questioning her claim of having 'foreign experience." I see examining claims as a good practice. She doesn't have that experience. In fact, all she really can claim is 6 years as a Senator and being married to the President of the United States, marriage doesn't equate to experience by proxy. Experience by proxy is no experience.

Judging the above posts, I think we are more divided than CNN has believed. I guess once you get a couple of wins, people feel like they can expose their true divisive nature.

I can see why Clinton supporters are so divisive… it comes straight from Clinton herself. It is quite unfortunate for the party.

Hillary 08   March 5th, 2008 1:48 pm ET

Everyone needs to go to the Houstooo.con Press and read the article about Obama.

Ellen   March 5th, 2008 1:48 pm ET

I have noticed how the Clintonistas want to view Barack's raising the question about, what does Hillary have to say to support her claims of experience, as negative campaigning. This is not negative campaigning by any measure, since he said nothing negative about her. Rather than attack her character and credibility, he is asking her to explain the basis for her repeated comments throughout this campaign, which she has never done. To see countless actual examples of negative campaigning one just needs to look at all the direct negative attacks Hillary has made against Obama's character. This is not a gotcha moment. This is another moment of hypocrisy though. So ugly, so desperate, sooooooo Hillary.

ZCB in New Jersey   March 5th, 2008 1:48 pm ET

This is sad that people have such negative things to say about Senator Obama. No one discussed what either candidate can do about the current state of the economy, lack of jobs, tax increases, foreclosed homes, affordable childcare and healthcare. How about some of the Obama critics and even some Clinton critics take a look at what either of them plan to do if they get into the White House. That is what affects you! It is more important to be educated instead of jumping on team Clinton.

Side Bar: I am not a religious person, but I believe that there is power in words so here goes "Senator Barack Obama will be the next President of the United States"…I just had to claim that victory for him!

John   March 5th, 2008 1:48 pm ET

SO SAD. You are going to lose Obama, you need to face up to it
Let's see. you have two years in Washiington.Illinois state senator
doing very little for your state, other than voting present on important issues. That's about it. Now as for the great Lady. Been in Washington for many years helping others. Then, first lady for Bill's eight great years as president. Has helped create programs to help others. A great US SENATOR. ;She's there to do the job she has been elected to do.You started campaigning when you walked into the town. Don't you think you should acquire some knowledge first. WE don't need another play it by ear, and hope for the best. We need Hillary, the best choice period.

Debbie Maha   March 5th, 2008 1:48 pm ET

Obama mentioned a "knock out" before , what happened? He and his so called supporters are not better than the others. I still have a lot of doubts and uncertainty about him. If he is that good, he should have won the nomination by now. Either Hillary or McCain will get my vote.

Linda K   March 5th, 2008 1:48 pm ET

Obama - I'm one of those sitting on the fence! I'm the "anyone but an old warloard, an old man…I'll vote the Democratic ticket WHOEVER"

BUT…negative campaigning is not the answer. Just tell the American people where YOU stand and what YOU believe…you don't have to be a Washington insider to become president…just be YOU!

By the way…why don't you choose Lou Dobbs as a running mate! THAT WILL ENSURE A WIN!

hkitty   March 5th, 2008 1:48 pm ET

Yeah,

I think her engagement on the national and international stage during the 1990s as First Lady do constitute experience, especially given how active of a First Lady she was. Being on the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee, etc. count. Representing and helping a state that was attacked on 9/11 count. Her point is that none of these three candidates have ever acted in the capacity of President because none have ever been President, but she was involved in many ways the closest of all of them. Regardless, McCain still has more experience, than her, but she is next and Obama is no where near this level. Period!!! Democrats pull your head out of the clouds. If you really want Obama as President, push for the joint ticket with him as VP. Doing so will give him the street creds to go up against Rep in 2016. It will also ensure the Dems win in Nov and keep the WH for almost 2 decades. Think people, think!!!

Renee Las vegas   March 5th, 2008 1:48 pm ET

Put your Seat belts on….Game On!!!!!!
Obama what took you so long? role your sleevs up and lets rock and roll !!!!!

BreKa   March 5th, 2008 1:48 pm ET

Charlotte, you see how discriminating you are, what is wrong with Obama mentioning Africa? Say something reasonable next time.

kevin   March 5th, 2008 1:48 pm ET

Obama can not win the white house with MONEY. He spent twice as much and lost. He is all rehtoric and if you notice he has become more the SAME in his speeches. Game over for OBAMA.

Go Clinton.

Brad   March 5th, 2008 1:47 pm ET

I'm a middle of the road Republican and I am continuously humored by watching you democrats fall into this "Hillary is more Experienced" trap.
1. She is counting 35 years from the day she graduated law school +/- a year or two.
2. She is counting 8 years as First Lady (only the positive parts of Willy's tenure)……….Give me a break
3. Running on the ability to be Commander in Chief…..John McCain would chew her up and spit her out.
4. Obama has more years of legislative experience than she does.
5. Obama isn't just speeches. He has defined his p[rograms as well as she has.

Now the Clinton campaign is going to try and re-institute Florida and Michigan. The arrogance of this family is amazing.

You Hillary supporters need to step back, get educated and then make your determination based on facts, not her BS

dofogo   March 5th, 2008 1:47 pm ET

Bring it on Obama. Hillary is just getting warmed up. Besides, not only does Hillary have the experience, she's got the stuff to back up that experience. And well over 30 US Generals and high ranking military officials have faith in Hillary's vast experience to lead this country as Commander and Chief. So bring those questions on…we welcome them!

vjh   March 5th, 2008 1:47 pm ET

clinton brings up the fact about exp and what to do in a tough situation.well heres one for her.what do you do if Bill finds another woman in the white house?I don't want someone who has to deal with this again.my vote at first was for her or Huckabee.but to here Obama the last 2 months changed my mind.to see those 2 on the same ticket was a great plan.But now he doesn't need her.She will need him more than he will need her.she complained about the media and now the seen has changd on him.but guess what it is about to hit her again.People will begin to bring up her taxes,taken documents from a guy who committed suicide,her exp,and much much more.it will come from the poeple an not the media.this will bite her big time.The REP are so scared that they are trying to get H Clinton in that they are teaming up on Obama.They don't want him to win the DEM nominee.Cunningham and Clinton said the same things but in a different way.Remember about the light from above.They have teamed up.we better wake up.Bush say that Obama better focus on Clinton.He hasn't said it about her on Obama.

Tony   March 5th, 2008 1:47 pm ET

If HILLARY wins, I'm voting for John Mc Cain, really she is such a calculating lesbian phony. Anyone voting for her is clearly a bigoted, lesbian loving communist. Long Live real Up-And-Coming Young Democrats® of All Colors. Hillary also won because of Hispanics who hate black dudes. Sad, but these are the signs of the time.

Sue   March 5th, 2008 1:47 pm ET

Why won't the media post both candidate's actual experience??

QuietStormX   March 5th, 2008 1:47 pm ET

I've been saying this forever! Hillary has never held a public office but for her Senate seat. Before that she was a First Lady and wife of Bill Clinton. Barack has more public office experience than she does. Where is this money coming from to loan her campaign five million. What deals have President made around the world? Who pays for the plane Bill and his daughter uses??? Where are those latest tax returns and W.H. records…. Answer those questions Hillary and Bill.

Plus: I don't see a ticket with her or bill on it with Barack Obama! She needs Barack to help her win the general. I will not VOTE for Hillary period!

Ketoe   March 5th, 2008 1:47 pm ET

Experience

Hillary campaign began as the sure thing, lots of money, the machine, labor, endorsements, the black vote, the hispanic vote, and working folks. Lets talk about her experience at running something her campaign. She has lost the black vote, labor vote, the machine has crumbled, and she had to loan herself money. (Money she can load to her campaign in the democratic primary but states the primary voter do not need to know where this money comes from she will file her taxes after the primary IF she win) She has had to fire staff, reshuffel staff, and she laughs and whoops it up when she wins (see Ohio), but bails on voters when she lose( see Virginia, wisconsin, etc) Thats EXPERIENCE. WOW

Haley Rodman Clemson   March 5th, 2008 1:46 pm ET

Hillary and Obama both have the same stance on issues, weak resumes and a sense of entitlement to the party's nomination. This pillow fight is getting a little meaner. Now Obama is flailing with a pair of bunny slippers. I can't help but picture these two at a sleepover, in a pillow fight where one or both of them got hit in the face and is fighting and crying at the same time. Big Daddy McCain needs to pop in on the slumber party and finally put them to rest.

McCain/Lloyd Hansen 2008

Maxie   March 5th, 2008 1:46 pm ET

Hillary will lose to McCain because a private group of Republicans will do a Swift Boat Thing based on her numerous legal problems in the past. I would now like to see Obama point out some of her past issues, including losing health care, and point out that he has more years as an elected official. Keep it sharp and simple.

Jodi   March 5th, 2008 1:46 pm ET

Our country is already in debt.. It has taken more Security ($$$) to watch Obama then any other candidate. What is going to happen if he becomes president???

MSW   March 5th, 2008 1:46 pm ET

I don't think Mr. Obama is in much of a position to question anyone's experience much less Clinton or McCain. More hot air…

Brian   March 5th, 2008 1:46 pm ET

If people would actually do their research, they might actually see that the claims of a back door meeting between the Obama campaign and the Canadian gov't never happened. Both the campaign and Canada have refuted the memo as being grossly distorted. Also, how is Sen. Obama asking Sen. Clinton to provide concrete examples of her experience going negative? He is only asking the electorate to pay attention to the actual political issues and exaggerated claims of the Clinton camp, as opposed to the underhanded ads the Clintons are running.

Please, people, look at every candidate's website. They all have plans and real goals laid out for the voters to review. You will see that Obama is not just fluff and stuff, but truly has a vision of what this country can be.

Go Obama!

GoHill   March 5th, 2008 1:46 pm ET

Hillary has shown us she is willing to put aside ego and do what is best for the country and the party. She is willing to have the best of all scenarios under these crazy circumstances, a joint ticket. This shows HER to be the uniter, not Obama, as he has professed.

Obama needs to be willing to do the same- otherwise his EGO is trumping reason and the good of the party and country. I hope he proves man enough to reach out to the 50% or more of voters who want Clinton for president.

Let's face it- 50% of the votes, counting the independents and republicans (who are not registered voters with the democratic party) does not and will not give Obama a mandate. He can not win the election with less than 50% of the democrats behind him . Furthermore the DNC will have to get the superdelegates to vote the will of the party and not the will of republicans and independents.

That is just how the system works. Obama be man enough to unite the electorate and the party. If you can not/ will not do that, then we know you can not unite the country. Hillary can and WILL do all of that.

Joseph   March 5th, 2008 1:46 pm ET

Anyone who thinks that Hillary does not have the experience has not been doing their homework. Read more and talk less. Have any of you really looked into her record as a senator or anything that she has been a part of.? I do not think so. You are just sore because people are realizing that Obama does not have as much experience. Even in the US senate he shows very little record of crossing party lines. Quite frankly his lack of foreign policy experience shows when he makes such a comment as being willing to talk to our enemies with no preconditions. I look forward to that coming out in a future commercial. I personally do not want an Obama-Nation.

DfromNy   March 5th, 2008 1:45 pm ET

Wow, if we count her years in the White House , why don't we nominate Nancy Regan as a VP?

Hillary proves that despite the fact that she can't win this nomination, she goes forward. She is ready to throw mud another day.
She doesn't care about voters or she would respect them. She is ready to drag the party behind her no matter what happens.
She is only interested in herself-Period!

It would be Hillayous if it weren't so sad.
Keep on plugging her message Cnn.

Jewel Montgomery Dallas, Tx   March 5th, 2008 1:45 pm ET

This "Dream Ticket" that was mention here on CNN is a joke. Hillary knows many will not vote for her who supported Obama. She will do anything to beat McCain just llike she will do anything to win the Democratic nomination. I am a democrat but I will never support Hillary. I will vote republican first. She proved in the debates that she cannot be contained. Those who modirated the debate could not stop her if she wanted to say something. I hope she is not the one to answer a phone at 3′0 clock. She is too firery. I see no compasion in her. Maybe it was distroyed with her dealings with Bill.
The media has given her a a free ride concerning the reporting of her taxes.
Hillary had to go negative to get a win. Is it worh it? She is handing John Mcain the presidency.

Renee Las vegas   March 5th, 2008 1:45 pm ET

Put your seat belts on….Game On!!!!!!!
Obama what took you so long,? …Role your sleeves and lets rock and roll !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Rick - Syracuse, NY   March 5th, 2008 1:45 pm ET

Obama is saying she might not have the experience? That's funny coming from the rookie. There's way to many jokes that could be made out of this at his expensive… maybe I better leave this one alone, hahahahahaah:)

Benjamin   March 5th, 2008 1:45 pm ET

The truth of the matter is Senator Clinton has 35 years of institutional knowledge and experience in how the government works at local, state and federal level in the United States. She will be more adept, as president ,to use the all the tools of statecraft available to solve problems be it domestic and international.

Jason   March 5th, 2008 1:45 pm ET

I love how you Obama supporters have been playing the "holier than thou" card during his winning streak. Such as, "we've had enough of dirty politics, she's doing a smear campaign, keep to the high ground, etc. etc. etc." but now that politics as usual apparently worked, you're saying, "It's about time Obama. Go on the offensive Obama, etc., etc, etc."

Either he is about change, about changing politics, about changing the divisiveness in this country or he's about winning. I have a feeling over the next few weeks, you're going to see that Obama is about winning, by any means necessary. He will go dirty, he will go negative, and he will get nasty.

I wonder how you will all react to your candidate then. My guess, is that you will love it. You are a bunch of sheep.

Go Clinton, IL   March 5th, 2008 1:45 pm ET

Hillary wasn't sitting in the White House baking cookies for 8 years! She was one of the most prominent first ladies in history and was very active in Bill's presidency, advising him on policy as well as traveling the world as an envoy for the United States. Before that she performed similar duties on the state level for 12 years as the first lady of Arkanasas. This doesn't even include her activities in politics prior to Bill becoming govenor, nor the fact that she's now in her second term as the senator from New York. Regardless of all of her experiences on her own, of which there are ample, it seems to me that even if there were none, this notion that her time as first lady, and the unique manner in which she fullfilled that role, didn't help to provide her with a myriad of experiences that will make her a better President is just absurd! Hillary didn't get where she is today because of Bill, nor for her recipes in the kitchen. She's where she is because she has the right recipe for America's future!

Fay (the Texan who voted for Obama)   March 5th, 2008 1:45 pm ET

It was very disappointing to see Mr. Obama lose Texas. I know he'll get the most delegates for the caucus (the fiasco that it was). Half of the people there said that if she's on the Nov. ticket they will not be voting period. I'm an Independent and I feel the same way.

I love how Mr. Obama has been taking the high road but I do think that now is the time to shine some light on this manipulative woman! He doesn't have to go negative (which I don't see him doing).

Rick, Kansas   March 5th, 2008 1:44 pm ET

Hillary is running a two pronged campaign… Sympathy and Fear. She is trying to say we will be vulnerable if anyone other than her gets the Presidency When things get rough she whines or cries to get the sympathy vote. Does this mean that if that red phone rings at 3:00 am she will cry?

Patrick Anthony Drake   March 5th, 2008 1:44 pm ET

JUDGEMENT may be best estimated having more than ONE quantity of analyses.

Jesse Boren   March 5th, 2008 1:44 pm ET

Clinton is the one getting a free ride from the media. I guess they want to let the right wing do it for them after she wins. There is still a lot of dirt on her that hasn't been discussed much. The Dems are so stupid that I'm sure they will elect Hillary, I've never thought otherwise. You are talking about the party that choose Kerry. How stupid can you get. They always choose the worst person. I have voted a lesser of two evils all my life but that ends now. I will never vote that way again because you still got evil in the end.

Follow the Money   March 5th, 2008 1:44 pm ET

OBAMA CANNOT WIN - HE LOST OHIO.

ONE MORE THING, HISTORY TELLS US THAT IOWA ALWAYS CHOOSE THE LOSER WHILE NEW HAMPSHIRE ALWAYS CHOOSE THE WINNER.

BY THE WAY, OBAMA IS NOT A MUSLIM. THE "H-word" is now forbidden. It's just like using the "N-Word"

Ann   March 5th, 2008 1:44 pm ET

The voters are going to get to see the real Obama I am afraid the more this goes on, Hillary does not appear to have anything to hide, I could be mistaken but she does not appear to be a person hiding a secret she is afraid America is going to find out. Now back to Obama, the negative ads will start, the negative comments, they already have, her phone ringing ad, he responded back to her using her own Fearmongering (Spelling) ads as he called them, but isn't all part of the campaign? Has it not gone on forever and forever? If you do not bring out the negative, how can you appreciate the positive???

Ann
Decatur, AL

BL-NYC   March 5th, 2008 1:44 pm ET

SORE LOOSER.
Why is it that Senator Obama did not challenge the experience claims a year ago? Odd…
He is just not ready.

Rich K   March 5th, 2008 1:44 pm ET

Besides great speeches, what exactly has Senator Obama done? He touts his anti-war speech at a time that he was not privy to the information exchanged in the US Senate that convinced the Senate ,at the time, to back the President and try to stand united. He critisizes policies by those who dared to try to make a difference. If HE had ever written a policy he would know that humans are flawed and at times even our best intentions need to be tweaked once implemented (can you say NAFTA). He has no track record, just great words, and he has a large number of followers fooled, It's "the Emperors New Clothes"!

Joe   March 5th, 2008 1:44 pm ET

Why is CNN and the other media talking about Clinton's connection to fundraiser Norman Hsu who swindled investors out of millions of dollars and made illegal donations to Clinton.

An Army Veteran   March 5th, 2008 1:44 pm ET

Obama/Powell in 08! Should scare the bejesus out of old Grandpa Munster.

Houston Texas   March 5th, 2008 1:44 pm ET

Let's face facts. Neither Obama nor Hillary have any experience in foreign policy and both of their domestic policy platforms are based on bigger government and tax increases. This is not a change for the future, this is a return to the 1970's.

Question   March 5th, 2008 1:43 pm ET

Think about how badly he handled NAFTA, and how his wife speaks.
That is just lack of experience for him, and carelessness for her.

All you Sen. Obama lovers need to start looking at the facts. And check out the websites. Talk is cheap, and cheap shots are what you are doing.

TAA in Atlanta GA   March 5th, 2008 1:43 pm ET

One has to laugh and question Obama about his so many tired preacher sermons about how we can pull people together and unite the parties, well where is all of this when HILLARY has already suggested that maybe there can be a joint ticket and run together and beat the Republicans. Not a word of such from the preacher Obama. I cant help but think where is his pulling together and uniting the country when he isn't even man enough to say anything about that. One wonders if he can take a back seat to a woman, hummmm maybe it is something in his upbringing that prevents him from doing so????????

Paris   March 5th, 2008 1:43 pm ET

And Obama has the experience???
The guys has no clue when it comes to foreign affairs.
Iranian goverment is responsible for killing our sons in Iraq and likes to meet with them!!! We don't need that kind of a president.

Did anyone notice how saaaaaaaaaad CNN anchors looked last night.

Thank you TX and OH.

Dennis   March 5th, 2008 1:43 pm ET

I've been asking about Hillary's experience for a long time. I'm glad it is about to become an issue. When asked last week for an instance comparable to the 3 a.m. crisis call that appears in her ad, she couldn't come up with anything. That is because there isn't anything. Questioning a credential touted by the opposition is not negative in and of itself. It is how the criticism is made. And for you Clinton supporters, why is it going negative when Obama questions Hillary's experience, but it is "drawing distinctions" when Hillary calls into question Obama's record?

Deb IL   March 5th, 2008 1:43 pm ET

Obama evades and deflects, then accuses Clinton of negativity. Poor baby! Real working people aren't buying it. To quote George Bush, "It's hard work" campaigning Senator. I'm tired of the attitude everyone should step aside and hand him the nomination because he is fresh, new, and it's the politically correct thing to do. By the way, why does he frown all the time when he speaks, the man never looks happy.

Rose - Baltimore, MD   March 5th, 2008 1:43 pm ET

Obama do not accept VP post from Clinton. You had better reject and denouce it publicly, it is a trick to get your votes for the remaining primaries before the nomination. You are better than that. She has smeared you all this time and even endorsed Mccain over you. Let her reap the fruits of her own divisiveness that she has sown. If she gets the Dems nomination due to superdelegates, McCain will win in fall as prez then you can come back again in 2012!

Randy - Denver   March 5th, 2008 1:42 pm ET

What the elections showed last night is that for all the talk of change people do not waht change they simply want more of the same. I can simply point out to those who say he spent twice as much and still did not win that 2 weeks ago she had margins of over 20% in Texas and 30% in Ohio, he SIGNIFICANTLY cut into those margins, even with Ms. Clinton going negative. I have friends in Texas and Ohio who were telling me they got letters and emails about Mr. Obama being anti American and that he is secretly a Muslim, yep these stories are still out there and unfortunately lower income, less educated people (and in some case bigoted) still believe these stories. So I would say considering the bad press of last week (Rezco and all) and the continuing lies about his patriotism he did real well and I would point to the delegate numbers to prove my point. for all her "Great Victories" last night I notice she barely amde up any in the delegate count. But I guess that will mean little to the Clintonistas, they will now begin to cry foul when Mr. Obama has decided to question Ms. Clinton on HER experiance, when he starts to bring HER record under scrutiny. But keep this in mind folks he will be MUCH kinder to her than the Republicans should we be so unlucky as to have her as the Democratic choice.

merlon from nc   March 5th, 2008 1:42 pm ET

dick chaney, rumsfeld and colin powell had 100 years expecience combined and messed everything up!

spider   March 5th, 2008 1:42 pm ET

Yep. This isn't negative campaign rhetoric, Obama is speaking the truth. Compare their congressional records and it's plain to see who has been working for the American public rather than positioning themselves for a negative campaign using lies and innuendo.
Hillary claims these were big wins, but they were not. It's easy to see that the general public and polls nationwide are for Obama and her continuing in the campaign will only do severe damage to the Democratic party. It's time for her to do the right thing!
Go Obama!

~ Jan, New Jersey   March 5th, 2008 1:42 pm ET

Sadly, you have to play harder when the opposing team gets down-right raunchy and evasive with their tactics. I say "Go for it, Senator Obama!" We're behind you all the way!

Let her finally disclose her tax records! Put her money where her mouth is, fer pete's sake!

As to her experience at 3am when a crisis hits the nation - what the heck? Doesn't this feel like the paranoia that fueled the 50's with us being encouraged to build bomb shelters because of a possible attack by the Communists?

Come on! Concentrate on the domestic violence that plagues our very own country! We've got mothers killing their children, all coked up and high on something. We've got brothers, fathers, sisters killing each other. RIGHT HERE! YES! In the United States! Let her address THAT at 3 o'clock in the morning! We are a diseased society.

Somebody needs to focus everyday issues, not go looking for another war to get us into at 3am. Please………………

Senator Obama, you have so much to show the Clinton's of the world and I for one am proud of the gentlemanly way in which you've handled your campaign so far.

Now, dig in and bump their name off the ticket!

AJ   March 5th, 2008 1:42 pm ET

What's to debate? Obama has been a "no show" politician for years. He has done nothing in his "career." His lack of judgement and honesty is right out from in connection with his "boneheaded," crooked land deals and his attempt to end around the American public with the Canadian fiasco.
This guy is a liar and an empty suit.
Sam - Trying to compare Laura Bush to Hillary is one of the most idiotic comments I have heard from the Obamazombies. Clinton was always involved in policy during her years in the white house. Laura Bush is the most do-nothing first lady ever.
I have never voted for a republican in 30 years. If Obama wins the nomination, or is on the ticket in any way I will be voting for McCain and urge all Hillary supporters to do the same.

MMIK   March 5th, 2008 1:42 pm ET

She's out of her mind. Obama or nothing. It's not over yet and If the superdelegate vote her way then Obama supporters will not vote

Jo   March 5th, 2008 1:42 pm ET

Obama God Bless you. But be careful don't fall into Hiliary's trap. don't let the world think that you are as dirty and desperate as she is. God be with you man!!!!

Please don't censor this.

Brian-Trinidad   March 5th, 2008 1:42 pm ET

What a joke the Messiah is turning out to be!And what a joke the Democrats are turning out to be,letting this joker run wild with his silly logic.Does he really think people believe that his tiny background and experience in the Illinois State Legislature is what voters look for in a President?Might as well give it to McCain now.

Jodi   March 5th, 2008 1:42 pm ET

I do not understand why Obama would lie about his Muslim back ground. He was raised Muslim until he was 6 years old.. You cannot say you were never a Muslim…

How could you Obama fans not see that we need experience in the office we are in critical times.. Clinton's are tried and true.

Obama needs to concede so that he does not ruin it for the Democratic Party!

Go Hillary!

Oregon Voter   March 5th, 2008 1:42 pm ET

Umm, has Obama even watched any of the debates? Hillary stomps him on foreign policy issues and she totally owns him when it comes to discussing how to handle foreign policy emergencies. She's endorsed by dozens of generals and admirals and has used her power in the senate to visit places like Iraq.

Obama vows to meet with Hugo Chavez personally within the first year of his presidency. Give me a break. After he interns with Hillary for 8 years THEN he might be ready for the top spot. But it's really silly to believe that Barack has any experience at all.

Now, of course, maybe Obama wants to have a land deal with Hugo Chavez… that would explain wanting to meet him within a year.

Chelsea   March 5th, 2008 1:41 pm ET

When will CNN do a story that compares their Senate records to one another, when will you guys show the world all of Hillary's "substance and solutions", when will CNN break the story of Paul vs Clinton all over the headlines like you did with Rezko? Huh CNN, looks like you took Ms. Clinton's crybaby bait, you probably won't even post this one……

Andy   March 5th, 2008 1:41 pm ET

HAHA democrats! We will see who the American people would rather have answering those 3AM calls and who in fact has the ACTUAL Experience to be commander and chief. GO JOHN MCCAIN!

Black Man For Hillary   March 5th, 2008 1:41 pm ET

neither of these two should be claiming "experience." I do believe that Clinton knows more and has more influence in D.C.

Anyone can bring a message of Change to D.C., but, how are they going to get the congress to go along with them? Does he plan to veto every law he doesn't agree with? Will we have 4 years of a do nothing president? Where does all his campaign money come from? (welfare checks)

david   March 5th, 2008 1:41 pm ET

yes we can show you clintonians the we are bacccccccccccccccck

jp/michigan   March 5th, 2008 1:41 pm ET

Obama lectures about corruption in Washington and Kenya but" been noticeably silent on the issue of corruption in his home state."

Realty Check   March 5th, 2008 1:41 pm ET

At first, Sen Obama denied his team had a conversation with the Canadian diplomat about NAFTA, then, he admitted the conversation, but said it was taken out of context. which is it? On top of that, he is still only a senator, why was he, or his team getting involved with diplomats from another country? I heard the pundits say that it was a rookie moment. SOOOO? what does that say about his experience and his understanding of foreign policies and decorum?

If, in fact, the allegations were true, that there is possibility of double-speak on the part of his campaign, why wouldn't the American people want to know NOW rather than later?

Tony R., your comment about blue collar workers is demeaning - as if they have no brains to judge for themselves. Do you really think that Hillary's ad was saying that she will physically answer the phone, or do you think she meant that she will know what to do when a crisis call comes in? I'm on the side of the "blue collars", and happy to be there!

pth   March 5th, 2008 1:40 pm ET

some of you people are crazy, either of these two are better then what we got and lets keep our eye on the prize, we need a supreme court that is going to be balanced…. lets not self destruct. Hillary is a fighter and does know how to get things done, Obama is inspirational and uniter….. Dream ticket, um yeah!!! We need them both in what ever combination it is… he needs her as much as she needs him…… start emailing them and letting them know that….. lets not be short in our seeing…..

Tafoya A. Hubbard   March 5th, 2008 1:40 pm ET

Let's get ready to RUMBLE!!! I hate that he has to get a lil down and dirty but you can't play nice with the Clintons. If Hillary was on the right side of the Iraq war you supporters would want her to say it every 5mins. Don't get mad that HE was RIGHT and SHE was WRONG!!! I have been saying since this campaign started that she DOES NOT HAVE 35yrs experience and McCain has MORE yrs than that so what is she going to say to him???? I hate it had to come to this I wish everybody could play nice.

I do not want this "nightmare" ticket either.

God Bless Us All Now!!!

Linda   March 5th, 2008 1:40 pm ET

This is a common sense strategy Sen. Obama should have used from the moment she touted "35 years of experience", for she has done which endows her with super presidential qualifications.

Sen. Obama's legislative career is far longer than Sen. Clinton's, as are his senatorial accomplishments in IL. And unlike Sen. Clinton, Sen. Obama didn't get an added boost to his efforts for being the spouse of an ex president.

That is truly why Mrs. Clinton is so well known to Americans. Her private or public career record didn't propel her nomination then or now. It is her affliation with a 2 term governor, a 2 term president, and unfortunately, something of a 2 timing husband, which has propelled her onto her own political stage.

Sen. Obama didn't have that lofty, insubstantial credential. He had to accomplish his the good old, democratic way…. on his own merits; and the Obama Camp should never cease stating that fact, along with reminders of her past 'Vast right wing conspriracy' theories, and her present inaccuracies regarding 'press bias'.

The facts of Sen. Clinton's senatorial record, and that of her husband's presidential one (if she still wishes to claim it), should be front and center from the Obama on a daily basis to remind America of all the poor to disasterous decisions this couple has made, and the wonderful campaign promises they didn't keep.

Go for it!!!!

Adrian, NY   March 5th, 2008 1:40 pm ET

This in not Obama going negative, it is a question you have to ask when she makes these claims. Being first lady is not a position in government, the only position she has held in government was Senator.

I think Obama has run a positive campaign trying to stay above the dirt of the "kitchen sink" attacks from the Clinton campaign and continues to run on issues. John McCain says he is better on security and points to the fact that he was involved in every major military operation since 84. What does Clinton point to?

Obama raises a very valid question. If her answer is 7 years in the senate compared to his 3 then we can judge from there on the issues. If she says being first lady, then she proves what she has continued to prove over the course of her negative campaign…. She is full of crap.

Andy   March 5th, 2008 1:40 pm ET

Please explain this to me, Clinton supporters.

There's no way she can cut into his delegate lead, so he will come out of this in June with more pledged delegates. Thus, superdelegates would have to overturn the election results for her to win the nomination. If this happened, the Democratic party will be irreparably divided, and McCain will landslide. These electability arguments coming out of the Clinton camp overlook this reality. This is the reality of the situation. From here on out, her efforts damage the party and our chances to win in November. I see no cogent arguments to the contrary.

Go Clinton   March 5th, 2008 1:40 pm ET

Hillary wasn't sitting in the White House baking cookies for 8 years! She was one of the most prominent first ladies in history and was very active in Bill's presidency, advising him on policy as well as traveling the world as an envoy for the United States. Before that she performed similar duties on the state level for 12 years as the first lady of Arkanasas. This doesn't even include her activities in politics prior to Bill becoming govenor, nor the fact that she's now in her second term as the senator from New York. Regardless of all of her experiences on her own, of which there are ample, it seems to me that even if there were none, this notion that her time as first lady, and the unique manner in which she fullfilled that role, didn't help to provide her with a myriad of experiences that will make her a better President is just absurd! Hillary didn't get where she is today because of Bill, nor for her recipes in the kitchen. She's where she is because she has the right recipe for America's future!

NMartinez   March 5th, 2008 1:40 pm ET

Will look who the crybaby is now?
Obama goes making backdoor deals with Canada on NAFTA,Canada exposes him, he denies this ever happened, then says he knew about it but he didn't sanction it. Are we to believe he desn't know what his top people are doing on his behalf?
What does this say about his leadership skills? - He has none!
What does this say about his honesty? He has none! (first he says he didn't know, then he said he did know)- A liar outright!
What does this say about his Transparency in government? Sounds like BUSH POLITICS to me! - sending his dogs to make backdoor deals with Canada. Is this his idea of an open conversation with the American people?
Let's not get on dirty politics - read the "HUMAN STAIN" - Obama has successfully been using the "race-baiting" card from the beginning. He is just like his cousin Odinga of Kenya, strong-arming the black leaders that casted their support for Hillary, by threatening them to move over to his bandwagon or else.
The longer Hillary stays in this race, the more you will learn about your Trojan Horse Obama. Google: Obama and Sinclair, Obama and Odinga, Obama's church and Farrakan… and on and on?

So his big fight back at Hillary is "where are your taxes?" - cause I need to find something to kick some dirt back on you. Only thing is, Hillary had nothing to do with this one, this one he did ALL on HIS OWN!

Sridhar Prasad   March 5th, 2008 1:39 pm ET

Obama,
If you have to regain the momentum, you ought to be tough and do not hesitate to be crticial of Clinton and start laying the ground work in PA ASAP.

Go OBAMA!!!

Ketoe   March 5th, 2008 1:39 pm ET

Make me understand, you're up 20 points in the polls, you need to win by at least 65% to have a chance to get close in delegates, you have staked your claim on Texas and Ohio, and you have the brand name, democratic machine behind you in Ohio, a large hispanic vote in Texas, and when its all said and done, you do not gain in delegates, you're still behind in popular vote, and you have still won fewer states, BUT you claim victory, a hugh victory. What Spin!

Hillary has only won big states or states with a large hispanic population. (new your, texas, californis, new mexico, arizona, etc). Barack has won in the south, east and west, and in the midwest. Some say a democrat can't win without the big states, and he cannot win big states, so Hillary must be the candidate. Democrats will win new York and California, lose Texas and fight it out in Ohio Florida, and Missouri, with Hillary or Barack That's how it always is, this is why its called a primary. But the GOP wants Hillary because with Barack GOP states will be in play, states like Alabama, Georgia, Virginia and Colorado. Hillary will win the normal blue states, and hope she can win Ohio, Florida, and Missouri. barack will win the normal blue states, and fight it out in Ohio, Florida, and Missouri, but he will be in play in so many other states that Hillary will not. So while she is campaigning to be President of the Big states, Obama for President of the UNited States.

Finally all this jabbering about experience, please. Ask those same people what have Hillary or McCain has done and I will bet their answer will be the same, I don't know. At the same time if Hillary has so much experience why have she not been able to do anything about health care, she has been on the scene since 92, touting health care plan. Experience. She voted for Iraq, but she says it was based on the information she got from President Bush, info that she did not read. Experience, She promised New York 200,000 jobs, did not deliver, but during the debate she said that was based on Al Gore becoming President. Her experience seems to be based on bad judgements reached by bad judgements. great she won New York Texas, California, and Ohio, thats 4 out of 50, she has won a total of 14 states give or take 2.

The One   March 5th, 2008 1:39 pm ET

All I know is in America,when you are running a race ,the one leading at the end of the race wins. I have not seen any event in America,that let the second place finisher get the first place trophy. The WORLD is watching and so are we. If he(Obama) doesn't get the nod,we know there is no REAL democracy here. We'll know that it will always be dictated by the majority,and that will let minorities know to get from under oppression any way you can.That is the risk America is taking,don't go negative,stay positive and sleep good at night.Obama08

clarissa Wittenberg   March 5th, 2008 1:39 pm ET

I am deeply concerned about the ugliness of the Clinton strategy. She is deceptive and hides her income tax. A joint income tax, according to her, which could tell us more about her and Bill Clinton's finances. We do not know who has funded the Clinton Library nor the Clinton Foundation. We do not know to whom they are beholden.Nor has the press or even the public really acknowledged the role that Bill Clinton will play in the White House, in fact, we may never know even if she is elected. Her experience in the WH was social and health care planning. We know what happened to health care planning. Be aware that she has said she will have universal health care by the end of her second term. Lots of presumptions there. Let's hold Hillary responsible for her real record.

John   March 5th, 2008 1:39 pm ET

Hillary darling, what exactly IS your crisis experience? Watching Giuliani and Schumer on 9/11? I did that too. Visiting foreign countries? Yep, same here. Underhanded tactics when your down in the polls? Well, you've got me there…

Lawrence   March 5th, 2008 1:39 pm ET

These comments are outrages about Hillary's experience…
You bloggers are out of your mind.

Being a First lady for eight years alone is substantially more experience than Obama. It is the kind of experience that you cannot buy. It is the kind of experience that even running as a state senator of Illinois for 10+ years cannot compete with.
Everyone learns from being an under study. If you don't think she picked up some serious experience as a First Lady you are kidding yourself…… She also had quite a few years in Arkansasas well.
I am sure most of you know that she was no MArtha Stewart stay at home kinda wife by now…..

Go Hillary and yes……… I am a man

working mom   March 5th, 2008 1:39 pm ET

Please review past elections, the states that went red or blue and electoral college votes per state. Then do some simple math. To win in the general election, you must win the big states period. Hillary does that, Obama doesn't. Until elections become one man (or woman) one vote, then the electoral college will continue to determine who is president with the occasional "help" from the Supreme Court. Trashing each others candidate is rather pointless. Clinton supporters will not vote for Obama and Obama's will not support Clinton. If Mr. Obama receives the nomination, your new president will be John McCain.

CWW   March 5th, 2008 1:39 pm ET

Someone already alluded to this. Hillary is doing what the Republicans do, send uneducated white people messages that scare them into voting for them. Hillary can't win without the Republican tactics she loves to criticize. And people she is still losing, she was projected to win Ohio and Texas by 20 points just weeks ago. She won TX by 4 points. Don't be ignorant and think she did something huge here.

Elizabeth   March 5th, 2008 1:38 pm ET

Clinton supporters are so pathetic.

Clinton has *NOT* been vetted. . .She says she has been and the faithful flock on her every word.

As part of her *experience* she helped her husband get elected president.

I want to know when she first heard allegations/rumors about Katherine Willey.

I want to know when she first heard allegations/about Jennifer Flowers/

I want to know if before she did her "stand by my man" routine, she knew or should have known that he was unfaithful. This was her professional *experience*that makes her qualified for the White House–It is relevant.

I want to know if in her *experience* that makes her qualified to be President she lied about her husband's personal characteristics to get him elected.

She trashed these woman. I want to know if this woman who wants to be the first female President of the United States had knowledge of her husband's issues before she trashed other woman and raped these women's lifes and reputations to enhance her husband and her professional career.

Barack Obama is an inspiration to me because of his moral code of conduct. I am far more flawed and just a beginner. GAME ON you Clintonians!

My guess is that she has done things that could get her years in prison. We will see if Teflon Bill has the goods to keep deflecting

Angela   March 5th, 2008 1:38 pm ET

Nevermind HER experience. She can handle herself … let's talk about YOU! Ranting and raving about your Iraq speech from 6 years ago doesn't cut it anymore. What else you got?

Our boys are giving up thier lives for a Pres who lacked Exsp. we cant afford that again, look at us now. Education does not qualify EXP MR OBAMA.

J. in PA   March 5th, 2008 1:38 pm ET

Why does she want someone who she is constantly tearing down as unqualified to be her vice president?
Hillary's nasty words will come back to haunt the Democrats in the general election.
Gimme a break about this "experience" she has. McCain will chew her up and spit her out on this point in the general. Experience means nothing without judgment. Let's get a clear contrast in this election, not more of the same!!!

Greg McBride   March 5th, 2008 1:38 pm ET

Senator Obama is a good man, BUT, we need a President, not a
Motivational Speaker. I am tired of hearing about hope and change with no substance how it is going to be done. Clinton and McCain can work with The House/Senate to get things done and Obama has bascially been like a rock star without mentioning any issues! He gets the crowd wound up, preaches about change and hope, than no substance, it is redundant and people are ignorant to think someone with no plans can change Washington!

Anonymous   March 5th, 2008 1:38 pm ET

Hillary's experience is cumulative and I am sure she was well aware of many of the policy decisions in the W.H. All this negativity towards Hillary is biased. Do you realize the Repub started that smear because they didn't like Clinton after losing the WH to the Dems and they certainly couldn't accept a strong, career type woman as a First Lady. They were living in the cave-man times where the wife was subservient to her husband. Based on all this negativity, sexism still exists.

Why don't you investigate his legislative record and realize that he was given preferential treatment by the Senate president. He also hasn't spent enough time in Congress and has one of the worst records with being bi-partisan. So much for unity.

Francie   March 5th, 2008 1:38 pm ET

Thank you, Rhode Island, Ohio and Texas.

We love you!

Hillary is on her way to the White House.

Chuma   March 5th, 2008 1:38 pm ET

Let the battle begin!!!! Don't forget McCain while you are in the process. His only experience is as a soldier. That is by far not enough to make a President. What we need as a President is someone who understands the people, and have the ability to bring about the economic changes neccessary to restore the world's confidence in USA. Bush and the republicans have failed us and will continue to fail us (since McCain is trunpetting "proudly" that he will keep USA in Iraq for a 100 year and have confessed that he has no clue about the economy). Democrats and disenfranchised Republicans and Independents we must rally around Obama for president and Hillary for VP to ensure that we do not let these clowns (Bush and McCain) back in the office!!!!

stacy   March 5th, 2008 1:38 pm ET

i live in Texas, and believe me Obama is no Angel. He Attacks his opponent & is misleading about his oponents too. Have any of you Obamaniacs read about his background or his personal beliefs?? He speaks of change, but has never actually told us how he will bring our troops home or when. He has no idea how to fix the economy, and what will he do when McCain starts to attack him. I know he will talk about not voting for the war in Iraq. Let me ask you this, did you think when the government told us about WMD's that we should go to iraq??I'm sure some or maybe even most of you did. So maybe you should think about that before you vote or attack Hillary.

Independent NJ   March 5th, 2008 1:38 pm ET

Where is her "experience"? Where are her tax returns? Where is her records from being First lady? First lady is definitely not experience. Why are people voting for a president just because she is a woman and a Clinton. Being a Clinton alone should scare Americans. The Clinton administration resulted in a separation of Republicans and Democrats. Congress and the House are the most inefficient, ineffective groups of people because their focus is off the country….Thanks Clinton…
I will never vote for a lying, cheating , divisive woman, with a name that disgraced this nation. Apparently playing the victim and dirty politics works for the media and ill-informed voters. Very Sad…Obama is the people's choice, Clinton is the Machine….Who do you want to answer the phone at 3 am??????

Amy, IL   March 5th, 2008 1:37 pm ET

Obama is still in the lead with delegates. For her to suggest that she's in the lead is dishonest. For her to try to claim Michigan and Florida is cheating. She's trying to steal the nomination and the media is encouraging it. Shame on you Senator Clinton.

Darth Vadik, CA   March 5th, 2008 1:37 pm ET

well of course he does,
he has way more legislative experience than her, 8 yrs in the Illinois senate where he has sponsored or cosponsored over 820 bills, plus his time as a senator where he has sponsored or co-sponsored 427.

And to you Hillary supporters name one important senate bill that Hillary has sponsored and co-sponsored, just one.

I can name two major ones from Obama:

1. Coburn/Obama government transparency act in 2006
2. Lugar/Obama nuclear proliferation & convention weapons reduction act

So, stop this crap about Hillary having more experience than him, she really doesn't.

heartlight 3, Maui, HI   March 5th, 2008 1:36 pm ET

I am very disappointed in the voters. I had hoped that we as a people had progressed to the point where we saw through the tactics employed by Karl Rove and the Republican attack machine. Apparently we have not. If that is so, I'm afraid we will deserve what we get.

Grant   March 5th, 2008 1:36 pm ET

Finally, he should have done this on the weekend. It definately cost him Texas as they like a fighter who throws the sink back! I know he tried to take the high road but he is dealing with the Clintons…what did he expect…I am interested in what foreign policy decision she made 35 years ago when she was 27?! She has been Senator for 6 years…the other decisions were made by Bill not her! Who is actually running here? Unofficial third term of Bill? Plus get off this Commander in Chief and answering late night phone calls platform, (Neither of them in reality are remotely qualified to deal with military issues and it is becoming laughable) McCain will slaughter any nominee on this point and the Republican Machine will have a field day knocking the Dems around on this…stick to the economy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Tina, North Carolina   March 5th, 2008 1:36 pm ET

Way overdue, Sen. Obama. That experience claim is ridiculous. Being the First Lady does not give you experience as President. And when she got a job she could sink her teeth into HEALTH CARE, she failed-miserably!!
She's got a couple of more years in the Senate…so what!

35 years of experience!!! At what??

C'mon Sen. O. Let's get cracking…you've been way too nice.

ES   March 5th, 2008 1:36 pm ET

Lets get real. The only real change this country needs is Hillary Clinton who will turn this country around with her universal HC, green jobs, get us out of foreign oil dependency and the Iraq war, change to a better educational system, etc. She will deliver these changes because she had proven herself as a fighter for the issues that confronts us esp those who are struggling everyday because of lack of. She is resilient and for those of you who has questions about her 35 years of experience , go to hillaryclinton.com and you will be inspired by what she had accomplished. She is a role model for all young men and women who wants to reach their god given potentials. So you can bash her all you want but I think she has the strength and the ability to withstand whatever attacks thrown at her. Her plans are not just promises for change and hope but they are solid and she will get those done when in office. She is a walker, a doer and not just a talker. Action speaks more than words. But maybe many people just want to be reinforced with speeches that makes you feel good and tingly because they do not want to see the reality out there. Do the speeches come from someone you think can deliver? Very doubtful indeed.

laura   March 5th, 2008 1:36 pm ET

Hillary did not win on exeperience. The results contineu to show that she's the choice of the uniformed, uneducated and most likely bigoted in America. Preventing wins like that is the reason superdelegates exist.

Mike, Arkansas   March 5th, 2008 1:36 pm ET

CNN?? Why is the media so hush hush about Hillary scandals vs. Obama.. Obama I cant hardly find anything yet CBS had 42% of his information segment about his church, muslim, etc.. yet hardly anything but 3% devoted for Hillary segment the next night of negativity! I dont see you having any articles about her past roles in scandals and investigations and shreading of documents etc. Why is that? Have you gotten some pay for not doing this news? Probably wont post this either will you?? Got to be hush hush!

Joey   March 5th, 2008 1:36 pm ET

Obama wants change? All I have seen him change so far is his mind and where he stands on issues. Read his book and see how much he likes the guys he is now denouncing. As for people that think that is rejecting their support, it's not. Think about it!

Kelin   March 5th, 2008 1:36 pm ET

The likely hood of Hillary talking about her 35 years of experience is about as likely as her getting those taxes done and out to the public…….

For those of you who have half a brain, Yes Hillary won last night…that is a whopping 14 states…..and still maybe picked up 5 whole delegates to cut into Baracks lead. I think the general elections should be held up until 2012 that way we can have more primaries and by then Hillary could catch up.

It is this simple…..She cannot catch him in states won, popular vote, or delegates….
* the Supes are going to go with the will of the people
* Barack has a better coalition of voters that include some of Hills demographics. WHile Hill thanks to Bill will NOT get over 10% of the vote from African Americans, a core Democratic group…..the supes know this.
* By Sunday Barack would have mopped up Hillary again in two more states and his delegate lead would have increased.

rb   March 5th, 2008 1:36 pm ET

Old White House Politicians in Washington, BE Ready!

Mr. Obama is coming and will fire you all!

Will he fire all old school Washington Politicians?

OR
What he is going to do with old politicians like (Kerry, Kennedy, Roy Laverne Brooks, Chairman Jay Rockefeller, Byron Dorgan, and Christopher Dodd)?

Will Mr. Obama forgive and forget the whole thing since they endorsed him?

Very interesting!
Wake up and think!

Ron W., SC   March 5th, 2008 1:36 pm ET

Nice try… But Obama's argument doesn't hold water.

Clinton is merely stating that she has MORE experience than Obama, which isn't saying much at all. Heck, I think my Labrador Retriever has more forein policy experince than Obama!

obaddz   March 5th, 2008 1:36 pm ET

Why can't Hillary see that, people don't like her, I can't stand this woman,I wonder how Bill stand her, I hate everything about her, and I hope Obama no matter what happen, won't run with her because I will definately not Vote for, Obama/ Hillary. Hillary is a real witch, they said Obama supporters are delusious but I think Hillary supporters are in Denial, Tell me, the math doesn't add up, she is not winning and another factor, she is not likeable, I bet so many superdelegates will vote against her when secret voting kick in during the convention, I am sure there are her close friends that won't come up openly against her but will definately vote against her in dark. Obama is just likeable, Hillary need to stop!

Jennifer in San Antonio   March 5th, 2008 1:35 pm ET

I'd never support that ticket. As a black voter, I will never vote for that woman. She has dismissed and demeaned the "black voter." I don't feel that Latinos and White women are the base of the democratic party. I feel the average american is the base of the democratic party and for some reason Hillary, her supporters and most of the media have forgotten that, that includes black people. Black people have voted for whites all of our lives and our vote was considered valuable. Now that we have an awesome black candidate, somehow black votes have been devalued. However, the black people are beginning to unite like we never have in a very long time. We are uniting for a coming cause. We are voting "FOR" something; not "AGAINST" someone. The latino vote was "AGAINST" a black man. Hillary Clinton has added to that conversation and has lost a very valuable ally in the black Americans. Not all black Americans, but at least 85 to 90 percent.

Osama AZ   March 5th, 2008 1:35 pm ET

Go go go Obama…. the game is not over yet…. I believe 100% your change will work… Please "Change the White House to be Black House"… We hope you will win and take care of our people in Africa and your brothers in Asia and Middle East….

Derrick   March 5th, 2008 1:35 pm ET

Go Obama!, Let Hilary explain her experience to the American people. Being a first lady is not foregn policy experience.

Shocked   March 5th, 2008 1:34 pm ET

"Only in American can a sheepherder from Kenya marry a white girl" Barak Obama. I can't believe that he said that? I am shocked. Is this the beginning of the end?

ibeam   March 5th, 2008 1:34 pm ET

It is time for Obama to highlight Hillary Clinton record of mis deeds and phony claims. Hillary Clinton does not have the moral values to claim the title of Commander in Chief. Her husband dishonored the title and Hillary would do the same. The problem with Clinton is not her gender, or her commander and chief experience. She has none. Unless you have been in the military you can never claim expereince as a military leadership. It's morals… Clinton has poor moral values.

w   March 5th, 2008 1:34 pm ET

Obama should also answer himself on that question — what is his foreign policy experience ??? Saying No to Iraq vote doesnt count as he wasnt there to vote… Only through experience can you gain good judgment… go Hillary!!!!!

Helen Seagull   March 5th, 2008 1:34 pm ET

I believe that the people are now realizing that Hillary Clinton is the best candidate to oppose John McCain. It is evident that she is intelligent, strong and certainly has good judgement.

Although Obama may have attracted the attention of the young people, much like the "rock stars" do, he is definitely NOT READY yet to lead this country, which is fraught with problems. Perhaps in 8 years, after he has become seasoned, he will be ready.

It is about time, that America, the most progressive, most admired country in the world, catches up with the rest of the world in electing a woman President. GO HILLARY.

Keith Hunter   March 5th, 2008 1:34 pm ET

If Hillary's years in the White House as First Lady had any substance to them we would all know exactly what the logs showed that she has not released. For a candidate to run with the First Lady experience as part of her platform and not having taken the steps to have the proof available at the beginning of her campaign smacks of a tactic that claims experience without providing the known documentation that would proove or disprove the claim.

If I remember correctly, Bill Clinton was paid by the Arab country that wanted to own a port in the United States that Congress soundly rejected as being against the National Security Interests. Is this why the Clintons' won't release their tax returns or divulge the income sources that provided a loan to her campaign?

Why does CNN and the media not dig into these matters that go to the core of the Clinton claim for experiences and national security record?

J from PA   March 5th, 2008 1:34 pm ET

Show us your taxes!

Where is the money coming from?

If your so vetted where's the returns.

What are you hiding?

Solutions how ABOUT ANSWERS?

Mike   March 5th, 2008 1:34 pm ET

To all of the Hillary fans…she won't beat McCain because no red state will turn blue with her as the nominee and some blue states will turn red. People hate her and will never vote for her. The right-wingers will come out in droves to vote against her. Obama will put red states in play because he's campaigned in all states and he'll keep the blue states that John Kerry and Al Gore won.
Keep going Obama!!! Go after her claim of experience. If being in the White House counts as experience, then the White House chef should be running for president.

margarita cart   March 5th, 2008 1:34 pm ET

Clinton-Obama!!! Stop the fight. Unite for the benefit of everybody.

Tina, North Carolina   March 5th, 2008 1:34 pm ET

Way overdue, Sen. Obama. That experience claim is ridiculous. Being the First Lady does not give you experience as President. And when she got a job she could sink her teeth into, she failed-miserably!!
She's got a couple of more years in the Senate…so what!

35 years of experience!!! At what??

C'mon Sen. O. Let's get cracking…you've been way too nice.

zlm1791   March 5th, 2008 1:34 pm ET

First he says on te campaign trail that she has to take the good with the bad for the Bill CLinton Presidency. Now he says she can't use that experience at all?

Peter S, Georgia   March 5th, 2008 1:33 pm ET

Hillary was not sightseeing in China in 1995 when she took the Chinese leadership to task - on their on soil - for violating human rights. At the Fourth World Conference on Women, "Speaking more forcefully on human rights than any American dignitary has on Chinese soil," according to the New York Times which has not been kind to her lately, then First Lady Clinton spoke up for human rights. But I suppose that does not count for experience to the Obama supporters.

Hillary was not sightseeing in the Balkans in 1999; she was negotiating with the government of Macedonia to accept refugees. But I suppose those refugees were not fashionable enough for the Obama supporters.

In 2005, the Franciscans International honored Senator Clinton through their "Africa Desk initiative" for "her work to eradicate extreme forms of poverty by providing micro-loans specifically for women around the world." But I suppose that does not count for experience to the Obama supporters.

Mike, Austin TX   March 5th, 2008 1:33 pm ET

I've been scratching my head for six months while she's waved her banner of "experience." She has as much experience as the white house receptionist. If I'm a doctor, does my wife have the authority to write prescriptions or treat patients? And if she's talking about being in the Senate longer than Obama, we're talking 3 or 4 years difference… has she really been "tested" much more than he has in this short time? Furthermore, take a look at the pieces of legislation they've both written or sponsored. Most of Hillary's bills have to do with nonsense like making formal motions to congratulate the champion lacrosse team at Syracuse or renaming a building after Warren Berger. All of Obama's legislation (many co-written with GOP counterparts, showing the ability to make progress across party lines) have substantive value, like nuclear leak accountability from power plants in the U.S., weapons nonproliferation and cooperative threat reduction.

This isn't Obama going negative, this is fact. No scare tactics, no buzz words, he's just asking voters to look at her so-called "experience".

CL Relf Deltona Florida   March 5th, 2008 1:33 pm ET

If experience was such a big deal then why isn't Joe Biden still in the race?

BL-NYC   March 5th, 2008 1:33 pm ET

Here goes Mr. I did not do it, you did again!!!
It blows me away… This guy is such a baby…
Yes, she has much more experience and I would NEVER want to see him negotiate anything with another country at this stage of his early government experience… He is simply not ready…
She is thoroughly better in contrast to him!!!
Examine it (without lying and pointing blame)…

Cris in Texas   March 5th, 2008 1:33 pm ET

She has more than you. What do you have Obama? a speech? What else??

Chuck   March 5th, 2008 1:33 pm ET

Other than maybe Political Science 101, NOBODY KNOWS what foreign affairs/military experience Obama has. at least Hillary is a member of the Armed Services Committee. Does he know what a rifle feels like? Can he name one general or admiral that is on his side. Bush got us into Iraq because of his "judgement", are we condemned to four more years of nail-biting, nervous "judgements" from Obama?

FELTON, Pa   March 5th, 2008 1:33 pm ET

…..Just wondering….If Hillary becomes President, how will she feel sitting at the desk of the Oval Office…think she'll wipe it down every day?……Must seem like returning to the scene of the crime.

Mercedes   March 5th, 2008 1:33 pm ET

Hillary is selfish. She does not have one authentic bone in her. Look at how she has acted throughout her campaign. She will say and do anything to let herself look good even if she is hurting her own party.

She is fake!

Tony, Powell, OH   March 5th, 2008 1:33 pm ET

Did I really see this comment???

"obama is going negative! what a phony, so much for hope!! go hillary 08″

Wow, if that isn't the pot calling the kettle black, I don't know what is. All the moderators/commentators could talk about last night is that Hillary's wins came as a result of mudslinging. I find it incredible (and I'm a McCain supporter by the way) that ANYONE supporting Hillary could find fault with Obama "going negative".

Andrew, Atlanta, GA   March 5th, 2008 1:32 pm ET

Obama doesn't have a leg to stand on in comparison to Clinton. To say or IMPLY that Obama has MORE or even EQUAL experience to be president compared to Clinton is absolutely delusional and utterly false. You might agree or like Obama more, but Clinton is the more experienced candidate overall.

The only real thing he can say that works in his favor, at least in the SHORT-term (he will be crucified by Republicans in the long-term because of this, and ultimately lose) is that he didn't vote for the war in Iraq. Of course this is misleading anyway because he wasn't a U.S. Senator at the time. In other words, he couldn't vote against the war because he couldn't vote!

C'mon Obama. Stop pretending you have more or equal or better experience. Stop giving vague promises of "change" without specific, concrete plans that actually differ substantially from Clinton. In my opinion, Obama IS the status quo. Clinton is the real agent of change in this election.

Kristy   March 5th, 2008 1:32 pm ET

It's a sad thing when Americans keep voting based on fear. I can't believe that 3:00 am phone call ad actually swayed people. When are we ALL going to learn that this nation needs to heal and move forward–and leave our fear behind us?

Obama still has the delegate lead which he'll definitely keep, even if it's narrow and the superdelegates will do the right thing: vote for the person who received the most pledged delegates (not to mention popular vote and states).

Obama: yes we can!

Anonymous   March 5th, 2008 1:32 pm ET

Here goes Mr. I did not do it, you did again!!!
It blows me away… This guy is such a baby…
Yes, she has much more experience and I would NEVER want to see him negotiate anything with another country at this stage of his early government experience… He is simply not ready…
She is thoroughly better in contrast to him!!!
Examine it (without lying and pointing blame)…

Cynthia, Los Angeles   March 5th, 2008 1:32 pm ET

CNN has made the statement that "The American people are tired of all of this" in reference to the Clinton/Obama campaigns. I, being an "American People" am not tired of this. The political process we see in action on the Democratic side is amazing to watch and is waking us up. What I am tired of, is CNN telling us what we should be thinking and biasing the vote.

Bob D   March 5th, 2008 1:32 pm ET

Obama is going negative? Like Hillary didn't do that a long time ago.
BTW, if HC is so in tune with those that have to work for a living, I wonder how she got $5 million of her own to contribute to her campaign. Haven't seen a multimillionaire yet who understood what it was like to have to count pennies to see if you could go out to McD's for a meal.

James M.   March 5th, 2008 1:31 pm ET

Joe…actually Obama did not lose anything. He gained enough to continue his lead in delegate count. He also maintains more than half a million popular votes than Hillary. However, this is the nomination process and not the general election and therefore the delegate count is key…which Obama win