March 5, 2008
Posted: March 5th, 2008 06:00 AM ET

(CNN) - Clinton's Texas win can be attributed to some of the same factors that led her to prevail in Ohio: Overwhelming support from seniors, voters worried about their financial status, and late deciders. Her big margins among these blocs were key in tilting the state to her favor.

Among 65 and over voters, she bested Obama by 37 points. On those voters worried about their financial situation, Clinton held a 13 point advantage. And among those voters who decided in the last three days, Clinton bested Obama by 23 points.

The big margins in those categories were hard for Obama to make up elsewhere.

Clinton was also buoyed by Latino voters in Texas– that group went for her over Obama by roughly 35 points, and constituted about a third of the electorate.

CNN Senior Political Analyst Bill Schneider

Filed under: Bill Schneider


johny   March 5th, 2008 11:17 am ET

c'mon americans, you are smarter than you think. choose your president who can lead the world in all aspect, not for yourselves. experience in world politics is bigger than just a big oratorical mouth. we dont need an orator in this world , we have lots already. you need a leader that is strong mentally, experienced , and knows what to do in time of crisis. make the universe happy again , a lady president for you is not bad. she's strong, give her a chance to lead your great nation

EBK   March 5th, 2008 10:58 am ET

Congratulations to Hill. I wish it was Obama in her position but congratulations to her. I am sure she is happy with her divisive ways. I don't know if CNN will post this comment but doesn't it say something when the higher education folks who know how to fact check etc etc are voting for Obama? Hmmm! I think that says something. The other people not highly educated are giving the presidency away to Hill. That frightens me!

Corinna   March 5th, 2008 10:57 am ET

Come on now, there were nearly 3 million Democratic votes cast and only 1.3 million Republican, how many people decided to be spoilers? Even as little as 3 percent changed the outcome. It is sad.

Shane   March 5th, 2008 10:48 am ET

Bill, as a Barack Obama supporter I believe that everyone should take a deep breath and take a good hard look at the results. Yes Hillary one and thats what she needed to do, but Obama still has his delegate lead which is what matters. The reason why I am not worried is because the young people are voting and voting more for him than for Hillary. have come to the conclusion that if the democratic party wants to see a democratic president in 2008 than they must listen to the young voters because we have spoken and are speaking for Obama and the young people will be mad if the DNC does not listen because they will fill like their vote did not matter if the DNC nominates Hillary Clinton and thats a risk in my opinion that the DNC will not take. That is why Barack Obama is going to be the Democratic Nominee.

Brian   March 5th, 2008 10:48 am ET

I will never vote for Clinton. Barack Obama has conducted himself and his campaign with sincerity, integrity, intelligence, honor and grace. He showed that again in his remarks last night.

It's a shame that large numbers of people in our country continue to fall for the kind of dirty politics Clinton's campaign relies upon.

If my fellow democrats aren't smart enough to reject this kind of politicking, then we don't deserve to take back the White House in November.

t-bone   March 5th, 2008 10:47 am ET

What are you hiding Hillary? Release your 2006 returns now so we can see who is really funding your campaign.

Hmmm...I guess it would show that Slick Willy is up to his old tricks.

Black Man For Hillary   March 5th, 2008 10:46 am ET

I keep hearing the statement that Clinton won due to mud slinging. One thing about that, if Obama was as clean as his zombies claim, the mud wouldn't have stuck.

HILLARY '08 "Yes SHE will!"

Cindy   March 5th, 2008 10:45 am ET

Hillary is the one we need. Obama he full o f himself.He lied.The questions just goes over his head because he has in order what the next attack will be on hillary.
Hillary is a strong women she has done so m uch.She has the experiences.Obama well he will be in the white house..Oh al-q isn't in Irag to build a home base. He said that and tried to cover it up by pointing fingers at Bush. The war is real and I do not want a 911 attack on our american people.

Bayou Joe   March 5th, 2008 10:44 am ET

Thank you Raza for bringing it on for Hillary. Texas did it's part now we need to seat the Florida and Michigan delegations or is this too much for the Obama fanatics. Read the writing on the wall, O has been exposed and it's all downhill from here. Hillary will win the nomination. You saw it here first. No Bama for president.

t-bone   March 5th, 2008 10:44 am ET

What are you hiding Hillary? Release your 2006 returns now so we can see who is really funding your campaign.

I guess it would show that Slick Willy is up to his old tricks.

RealityKing   March 5th, 2008 10:40 am ET

A study of the three broadcast network evening news programs indicates John McCain's media fortunes have taken a dramatic turn south since early January. McCain recieved just 30% positive coverage.

On the otherside, ABC and CBS gave Obama 90% positive coverage, NBC 73%. While ABC gave Clinton 68% positive, CBS 50%, NBC 38%.

FoxNews seems to be the only place to get balanced political coverage these days..., sad really. Don't you think??

independent   March 5th, 2008 10:40 am ET

woohoo!

Alex Mackin   March 5th, 2008 10:38 am ET

2 great presidents for the price of one!

oh, and barack as VP.

then all three of them will be there to pick up that phone at 3 am.

GO HILL!

John   March 5th, 2008 10:38 am ET

One of the factors that you did not consider is the "Primary Crossover". I am a Republican and voted for Hillary to keep her in the race to keep the pressure on Obama. As the main stream news media and the RNC and John McCain are not at this time. At the polls I was with friends that were doing the exact same thing. Clinton by no means came out of this winning on her merits and campaigning, but by Republicans trying to secure a campaign that will bring out the truth and allow McCain a victory in November.

cindy   March 5th, 2008 10:37 am ET

HILLARY DID NOT WIN BIG!! regardless of where her base came from!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Is the media and the American people not looking at the same numbers I'm looking at? Her own husband and many strategists, stated that she had to win BIG in Ohio AND Texas. Well people look at the numbers that are right in front of you. The only state that she leads Obama in by 10% is Ohio (and I wouldn't consider this winning BIG). She didn't win BIG in Texas people!!! There's a three % difference in that State between Obama and her.

SHAME ON YOU MEDIA! – Don't be fooled by the media people.

"Obama STILL LEADS and will become the democratic nominee for President!"

Where are your TAX RETURNS Hillary???? YOU stated at the last debate that you would make them available in "2 WEEKS", now, you're justifying releasing them in April by stating that April's the tax month— WE notice Hillary…. What are you hiding or rather what are you maniuplating??

Mariann Pepitone   March 5th, 2008 10:34 am ET

If Hillary wins the nomination for the presidency maybe that dream ticket can come alive. Clinton/Obama ticket would beat McCain in a landslide. And if Hillary only wanted one term it would give Obama the chance for the presidency which I think he would win. I think Americans would like that ticket. But we have to wait and see what happens.

Slap Stick, FLORIDA   March 5th, 2008 10:34 am ET

Clinton needs to win more than just big states and Latino/Hispanic voters come November Election and have not shown that she can do that. Obama has won over republicans, whites, blacks, youth, etc... and the youth will definately be a force to reckon with in November and Obama has managed to get them out.

Obama 08

Abu   March 5th, 2008 10:33 am ET

I do really hope that Obama is going to be nominee as presidential
Candidate for the Democrats because I support his Campain, and most
Europien and other Countries is behind him. He is a man for Peace, honest and also a person American People have to be trust.
I believe he can solve American Economy through good diplomatic
relationship with World Leaders. The World need Peace and Obama
can help to solve World´s Conflict.

Mariann Pepitone   March 5th, 2008 10:29 am ET

I states a long time ago on the message board that Obama would not win CA, NV, TX, AZ, and he didn't. I am glad for her because I feel that she has more experience to run this country than Obama. Obama is just a junior senator and I think he jumped to quick to run for the presidency. He should have waited another four years. Hillary will win in PA like she did in Ohio. If she wins in other big states she will win the nomination for the presidency. I believe she is the one to beat McCain not Obama. Hillary can match McCain's experience in a debate. Obama is a good speaker there is no doubt about that and he should try again later. He can draw crowds like no one else can. But I am a Clinton fan from the days of Bill Clinton. If Hillary wasn't running I would back Obama up because I am a democrat to stay.

An Agnostic Democrat   March 5th, 2008 10:28 am ET

To quote Hillary: "They don't count." Aren't these the same people that put Bush in office? No more Bushes or Clintons. They are all cut from the same soiled cloth.

Joe   March 5th, 2008 10:27 am ET

What we saw yesterday is that the undecided vote, the swing vote, chose to vote Fear over voting Hope. This reflects sadly on the US.

Hillary's brought out the same tactics Bush has used in his elections: Negative, negative, negative, Fear, Fear, Fear. This is the kind of manuvering that precipitated the War in Iraq. Hillary is desperate and is willing to manipulate at all costs.

We can not be motivated by fear, we must consider values.

adrian   March 5th, 2008 10:27 am ET

clinton wins big states only because ,its more difficult for obama to reach out to people in such states. Even so, obama was able to close the margin impressively.

Its only a matter of time before Obama eventually becomes the nominee,as he has better appeal,better managerial skills, intelligence and most importantly he is a genuine individual.

John, N.H   March 5th, 2008 10:27 am ET

God bless hillary

Lynne   March 5th, 2008 10:26 am ET

Way to go Hillary – There is no way that Obama will be the Democratic nominee now. She has won all of the big blue states and he has won none of those. He has won small red states which won't win in the general. Thank God that America woke up to what a slippery, polished Chicago Pol he is though in the past week he has slipped up by lying and getting caught. No way Obama supporters, that guy is going down and soon. I wonder how Teddy and John Kerry feel today.
What a couple of losers they are to have in your corner. Neither of them have ever really achieved anything except devastation of people and issues that affect our country. Go Hillary, You are our girl!!!!!

Tom   March 5th, 2008 10:24 am ET

The Democratic Party has to count Michigan and Florida, otherwise they will have a candidate for the "48 States of America" not of the USA. In 2000 they went to court to count the votes in Florida. Now in 2008 they don't want to count the votes in the aforementioned two states. The GOP could use this to capture the vote in November.

CultureGeek   March 5th, 2008 10:23 am ET

I suspect that the Limbaugh endorsement had an awful lot to do with it. It's ironic after she raised all that fuss about the difference between "denounce" and "reject."

Isn't it funny how she does so much better in states where Republicans can vote in the Democratic primary?

Sam   March 5th, 2008 10:20 am ET

Thank you Texas. Obama is winning the caucus and is leading in overall delegates. YES WE CAN!!!!!

Takisha   March 5th, 2008 10:20 am ET

Mrs. Clinton keeps claiming that she is better with the foreign policies. But her past experience clearly shows not only her lack of good judgment on Iraq also it shows how the Clintons failed to prevent or to stop the Rwanda Genocide. How can we trust her or his advisor (husband) again? We can only see a repetition of the past and not a new change as we see it with Obama…
T.B.

CH, Texas   March 5th, 2008 10:20 am ET

Texas loves Hillary!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

YLR   March 5th, 2008 10:19 am ET

Don't get too comfortable Hillary.

We should also suspect that at 3am you will be running another desperate ad that seems to have worked in your favor. I suppose it was because that's the only way you can swing the vote to your side.

IF HILLARY BECOMES THE NOMINEE WE ARE VOTING MCCAIN!!!

OBAMA FOR PRESIDENT '08!!!!!

ABC   March 5th, 2008 10:19 am ET

The difference was in the Texas – Mexico border counties where Team Obama lost in large numbers with the over 30 year old Latinos and Latinas.

Counties with large HRC wins:
El Paso 34,000+
Webb 24,000+
Hidalgo 40,000+
Bexar 20,000+

Total lost to voters in the border region 118,000+

ABC '08

mike nyy   March 5th, 2008 10:18 am ET

Are we forgetting the caucus?

Nelson, Colorado Springs Co   March 5th, 2008 10:18 am ET

Good Job Sen Clinton, Trick Trick Trick, Lies, Bill Schneider forgot to tell how you won. With help from a lot cross over votes from Republican trying to stop Sen Obama.

rock on Hillary   March 5th, 2008 10:18 am ET

Clearly we have a candidate in Hillary who has shown great courage, strength, tenacity and may I say, leadership worthy of being called President and Commander-In-Chief. She was the one that led her campaign out of dispair, she was the one who inspired them to rally, and she will be the one to lead them to victory in the fall. All the political experts, all the talk about delegates, all the hillary bashing, did not quell the voters will. In spite of terrific odds, in spite of those caucus debacles that disenfranchise so many, in spite of months of slanted media coverage, in spite of people telling her to quit, she came back to win. And people, the states that she has won the eventual nominee will have to win in the fall. That is a matter of fact. Period.

Jean N. McGuane   March 5th, 2008 10:16 am ET

Hillary won because FINALLY some in the media are starting to ask questions about Obama. The Rezko trial just started and will be going on for weeks with new developments every day; NAFTA -gate which was big in Ohio (my state); and the history of Obama's lack of accomplishment in the Senate are going to cause questions to be asked. Obama has been kept from the media; the last Q&A session allowed only 8 questions. Imagine if Hillary had curtailed reporter's questions to 8 what the reaction would be. Obama is an empty suit and I think Hillary's big win in the big DEMOCRATIC states (including Florida), are beginning to take its toll on the Obama campaign. Idaho, Utah, Alaska, Georgia, Nebraska, Texas (and even Mississippi) are not going Democratic in the national election in November no matter who the Democratic nominee is. I think those wins for Obama were "empty" wins as far as the electoral college are concerned. As Geraldine Ferraro argued in the NY Times last week, the highest percentage of support that Obama is getting from rank and file Democrats is maybe in the 15=20% range. Hillary has won Ohio decisively and she will win PA decisively. I think Democrats need to take a deep breath and ask themselves who they want to pick up the phone at 3:00 a.m. I think she won that argument and I think that is why she will win the nomination. Obama has already peaked and even if he picks up MIssissippi and Wyoming, these states are Republican in the national election. Michigan and Florida are not. Let's understand the map as well as the numbers before we crown Obama King.

Neal   March 5th, 2008 10:14 am ET

It is time for America to ask that Obama leave the race. It is clear that Hillary has won the most popular votes. She has won every Big state and Obama has not won one! If Florida and Michigan had counted Hillary would have this thing wrapped up!…..

I challenge all Hillary supporters to donate to her campaign this week. I am and I hope the rest of America does the same. We need a strong and intelligent President….VOTE FOR HILLARY! … GO HILLARY!!! ….. HILLARY 08!!!

Faizan Ali   March 5th, 2008 10:12 am ET

Congratulations to her and her campaign.

Adam in Indy   March 5th, 2008 10:12 am ET

Thank you TEXAS!

HILLARY 08!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Jules   March 5th, 2008 10:10 am ET

First, I would like to congratulate Hilary on her wins. Somehow I have lost some of that excitement for the election, as I am not impress with her willingness to speak for McCain about his experience, while criticize her own democratic teammate. She uses low politics to knock him down; yet she is willing to adapt the things that work for Obama. I am trying to figure her out as she appears to be fake, resentful and bitter as she expects that she should not have any challenges to being in the white house as if it is her right.!

piecrust   March 5th, 2008 10:09 am ET

HILLARY 08 –
I'm so proud of your resilience to combat the naysayers, if you believe profoundly in your causes to serve the less fortunate, this moment is for you!!!

Berkeley   March 5th, 2008 10:09 am ET

Obama people: you are great, please join us and let us put an end to this ridiculous Republican Administration.
Imagine all the we can do with 12 billion dollars per month we are spending in Iraq. We can solve many of our problems and create good will through out the world whille still taking care of our national security.
Our presence in Iraq is only justified because of the interest of the oil companies, who are not eager to find alternative ways of solving the problem.
They say: "If ain't broken don't fix it". Of course, the more gas goes up the more money they make. Look at Exon. They look after their interest.
Do we?

Alex   March 5th, 2008 10:09 am ET

Question: How would either candidate benefit if John Edwards were to throw his support in either direction?

Lawrence   March 5th, 2008 10:08 am ET

I listened to a woman last week in Texas say that Barack wont win because he's black. Who was that woman a hispanic who said that blacks wont help them if they get in office, thats what divides this nation.

Edsmug   March 5th, 2008 10:07 am ET

In 2000 was Al Gore experienced and no match to Bush, yet Bush won though close call and quite controversial indeed. In 2004 Kerry was also experienced and the world was rooting for him but Nay, Bush carried the day and has been at the helm to date. So this time roun America has this one candidate the rest of the world sees as the uniting factor to a polarised world and bitter critics of the USA seem to warm up to him. Thay are all ears and indeed they know if Democrats nominate Hillary it's all over Mac-Cain will sail through and the world will be even more polarised in the next 5 years of Republican rule.

So take heed America, the rest of the world has seen what Obama can Inspire and bring a change much needed in American foreign policy and bring in a new school of though.

Be warned Democrats – once bitten twice shy

Dora Ratkillah   March 5th, 2008 10:07 am ET

Gee, such an erudite analysis. I'm sure my 10 year old neighbor can do better than that. So much depth!

YOU NEED TO KNOW   March 5th, 2008 10:06 am ET

I used to feel that even if Hillary won the Dem nomination I would vote for her in the General. But after seeing how low her campaign will go, how low she will go on a personal level in being dishonest and lifting up the Republican candidate over her Democratic opponent, I think it's shameful. She's was losing this race when she tried to run it on the up and up, but now she's gone negative and will go again, in her MEANS justifies the ENDS mentality.

I CANNOT IN ALL GOOD CONSCIENCE VOTE FOR HILLARY....I WILL EITHER VOTE DIRECTLY FOR MCCAIN OR INDIRECTLY BY NOT VOTING AT ALL. I'M LEANING MORE TOWARD THE LATTER.

Larry Cooper   March 5th, 2008 10:03 am ET

I am constantly amazed at all the coverage that just states the obvious but doesn't deal with the unknown issues. what is happening with Michigan and Florida primaries. My understanding is that no delegates are being counted and thus even Obama will not get to 2025 delegates if Clinton stays to the end of the primaries. What is the Democratic Party doing about this ?

Gerard Shea   March 5th, 2008 10:02 am ET

Make no mistake. Al Gore will be the next President of the U.S.. He'll either be drafted by the DNC or he'll make his debut with proper timing. C'mon, does anyone really believe he's not going to be the next President? It's all about timing. All about timing. Strategy and tactical politics. You'll see.
Gerard / Monterey,CA

Rosemary   March 5th, 2008 10:02 am ET

What? Too stunned to comment? GOOD! Hey, Michelle – if Barry can't keep track of what his campaign advisors are saying to Canada, how can he keep track of the White House? Anyone looking at the maps on CNN sees that the ONLY constituency he can count on is in urban areas.

Dirk Hannema   March 5th, 2008 10:02 am ET

After all the talk and counting of delegates, it would be interesting and refreshing to go back to the actual votes which each candidate got.

Could you indicate where the total popular vote-count (not delegates) stands as of today for Obama and Clinton, compiling all votes casted in all states ?

Dirk Hannema, France

Deborah   March 5th, 2008 10:02 am ET

Get ready for a call for a do-over in Mich and FL, Sen Obama keeps harping on his delegate lead, a lead he would not have if Mich and FL counted. Howard Dean is going to be forced to address the Mich/FL issue because the Dems can't win the White House for either candidate without FL and they can't completely disenfranchise the FL voters. As a Floridian I think the first vote should stand because:

1. The only candidate that actually campaigned in FL is Sen Obama, he ran two ads on National Networks that were aired in FL before he pulled them so he already broke the rules.

2. All of the candidates in the race at the time of the FL primary were on the ballot and since none were allowed to campaign here, the vote should be valid as it was on a level playing field, except of course for point #1.

3. The Florida voter turnout for the first primary was overwhelming and decisive, doing it over will just cost the state 10million dollars of tax payer money. Florida voters already paid for their primary once, Gov Crist would love to lord it over democrats in the state that he had to pay twice for their votes to count. Making it much easier for him to be re-elected at the end of his term or giving him a chip to play if he turns out to be the VP nominee on the Republican side.

I urge all Democrats to tell the DNC no, we don't want a do-over, just enforce the rules equally (either a penalty for Sen Obama for campaigning in the state or counting the delegates already elected by Florida Dems). Either way it puts Florida voters in play and the pledged delegate count will more closely reflect the wishes of the Democratic Party electorate. (PS counting Florida gives a huge leg up Senator Clinton in the popular vote)

Michael   March 5th, 2008 10:01 am ET

But somehow Obama comes out with more delegates in Texas and she touts this as a "big win". Clinton is apparently poor at math.

GO Hillary   March 5th, 2008 10:01 am ET

It is about time that people started to come to their senses.

Obama stole this election via all the DNC mistakes made in this process. Allowing independents and republicans to choose the nominee of the democratic party- this disenfranchises the core democratic base.

Now they argue that maybe the superdelegates should not do what they were intended TO do- which is follow the wishes and votes of the registered democratic voters. Now they want the superdelegates to follow the popular vote. Unfortunately the republicans have been voting Obama, BUT this is a democratic party primary and the superdelegates should follow the will of the party faithful.

Then the DNC used 3rd world tactics to deny the right to vote to registered voters of 2 states.

Then many people who would have voted, COULD not vote in the caucus system. Primaries afford the right to vote to ALL who want to exercise it.

Without all that mismanagement and all the pro Obama media bias and attacks on Hillary- She would have won the nomination by now.

Let us all hope it is not too late to salvage this corrupt election process.

Allene Bailey   March 5th, 2008 10:00 am ET

Yea Hillery!!!
We prayed for you to win, and you DID!! You will be our President!
Keep on keepin on, we are behind you 100%.
We love you!!

CNN, Please Stop the Madness...   March 5th, 2008 10:00 am ET

It is going to be war from now on... What a shame, because Hillary will not be able to close the delegate gap, and the dems will be wounded even before we start the general election. But what does that matter as long as she can get back in that White House, right? NOT!!!!!!

In this war, Hillary, please be sure to remember Peter Paul, your tax returns, your husband, your true nature, etc, as all these things will show you for the coniving, sneaky rattle snake that you are.

I have not, and will not be fooled by your antics of late. You can go on as many talk shows as you want, but you can't change who you really are inside and you will never be able to close the gap between you and manipulation, cheating ,and dirt, nor do you wish too, Mrs. Clinton!

Obama '08

Mike   March 5th, 2008 10:00 am ET

I do not get why all of you Obama followers are telling Clinton to drop out because she is not going to get the delegate count... HE IS NOT GOING TO GET IT EITHER!!!

By saying that you are telling half of the nation their vote did not matter... It is obvious by last night's vote that some people do not believe Obama is the best candidate... Why is he afraid to finish the race he started??? I sure do not want a candidate that is afraid to finish the battle when the going gets tough!!!

True democrats know that to win the general election the states that Clinton has won are huge!!! If Obama can not carry them McCain will win... Why do any of you care about Clinton's tax returns??? I know that I am still waiting on mine to come back and I don't ask or want to know what other people got back!!! It sounds to me like everyone here is really searching for reasons to not like one of the candidates instead of looking at the issues... I think that is partly the media coverages fault.

Rena Hardin   March 5th, 2008 10:00 am ET

GO HILLARY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

hope4change   March 5th, 2008 9:58 am ET

Hillary used the lowest form of politics to win fear and bigotry. She is behind the whisper campaign about Senator Obama being a Muslim. I want her to release her tax returns and White House documents then we will see who has buyers remorse. Can't wait for the other shoe to drop.

Anna   March 5th, 2008 9:58 am ET

I knew we could do it. Thank you for uniting Latinos
Si se puede!!

Petra   March 5th, 2008 9:58 am ET

Thank you Texas and Ohio. Sanity is coming back? DoesObama really believe he can talk to voters one way and then behind their back go and talk to the Canadians the other way?

Hillary all the way!

Hope   March 5th, 2008 9:57 am ET

Without hope, there is NO FUTURE!
Mr. WINKY-Obama is starting to melt and the Amerian people are beginning to finally get a real look beneath those layers of "words" he so honorably stands behind. His shaky past is catching up to him and he thinks we are so dillusional that we couldn't possibly be capable of reading between the lines. The biggest lesson Mr. Winky will learn from this arrogant atempt to be president is that when you disrespect people through empty words and promises, you will end up eating those words and the only promise you will get back and honor you will have achieved, is the desprespect you have rightfully earned. America does not need another underqualified president in office. America needs a person who's roots with American patriotism run so deep that there is no mistake that when she reaches out, she has the American people behind her. America is the BEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD! Let's keep her that way with someone who is proud of her, Hillary Clinton.

Chris from California   March 5th, 2008 9:56 am ET

OHIO! RHODE ISLAND! TEXAS! You did good! You have spoken for all of the rest of the Hillary Clinton supporters in our country and we are grateful to you for it. YOU ROCK!

The superdelegates, if they are truly dedicated to the Democratic party, will have to take note that Hillary Clinton has won in the large states that will be important in taking back the White House in the general election. Barack Obama has only been able to get the smaller states, many of them that are usually Republican "RED" states – states that WILL be voting for John McCain in the general election. If that happens, our party will suffer under another Republican presidency for 4 to 8 more years. Please do right by our party, Superdelegates. We need you..

I think it is also time for John Edwards and Bill Richardson to get out there and endorse Hillary Clinton. She has EARNED your endorsements by speaking out and working hard on the causes that are near and dear to your own hearts over the long haul. Please endorse her now when it will really matter.

From PA   March 5th, 2008 9:56 am ET

I don't like Obamas politics

BUT

a HIllary-Obama ticket would be unstopable!!!

Maineman   March 5th, 2008 9:55 am ET

It's a big deal that Hillary won, ending he huge losing streak, but they aren't big wins by numbers. The fact that Obama came from behind nearly 20 points in Ohio to win 44% of the popular vote is a big deal. He also won 48% of the vote in Texas! This was a huge success for Obama in that he picked up a lot more of the delegates he needs to win and will probably pick up more once the results of the caucuses are tallied. GO OBAMA!

Bill   March 5th, 2008 9:55 am ET

Most of the young voters, 18-25 need to understand that thier brain has not fully developed. Medical fact.

Rather they are acting on inpluses, that is why they are voting for obama. They see obama like they view bubble gum music.

Not to offend our youth, however you need to have real life experiences
to fully understand how things work.

Take some time to review medical information, then go and vote for the real leader.

Fav   March 5th, 2008 9:55 am ET

Thank God for Clinton's wins!!
It is a relief to know that Obama's tactics (hiding his identity and selling himself to us as a true African American) are not working!! The big states, the ones that truly count, know that Clinton is the only one w/ the power, the might, the brains, the experience and the attitude to beat McCain.

Obama, get over it!!! America doesn't want you!! You're not American enough to be our president - OUT Obama!!

Goooooo Hillary!!! Mrs. President 2008!!

CAROLYN   March 5th, 2008 9:54 am ET

BILL,

BY WHAT MARGIN OF VOTES DO YOU THINK HILLARY CLINTON WILL HAVE AGAINST THE REPUBLICAN ATTACK MACHINE WHEN THEY THROW THE KITCHEN SINK AT HER. EXPERIENCE IN DIRTY POLITICS WILL NOT WORK VERY WELL WITH THE CREATOR OF DIRTY POLITICS. I REALLY WANT THE DEMOCRATES TO WIN THE GENERAL ELECTION. HOWEVER, I DO NOT SEE THAT HAPPENING WITH HILLARY CLINTON. THE REPUBLICANS ALMOST IMPEACHED HER HUSBAND. I NEED NOT TO SAY WHY. I THINK WE ALL KNOW THE ANSWER. HOW WILL HILLARY SURVIVE THE REPUBLICAN MACHINE WHEN HER HUSBAND'S SINS REAPPEAR AND BELIEVE ME THEY WILL. REPUBLICANS WILL NOT BE AS FORGIVING AS GOD.

carlavaness   March 5th, 2008 9:54 am ET

while I am confident Sen. Obama will win the nomination in the end. I find it particularly disturbing that a state (Ohio) who is devistated by the loss of jobs due to the unfair playing field of NAFTA, which was orchastrated and indorsed by Bill Clinton, and fully supported by Hillary Clinton, they now still support the Washington insider that delt them the blow. And Texas, Maybe life is good for an oil rich state, but I gotta tell ya, your "home boy" has put the hurt on the rest of the nation. The man doesn't even know what a gallon of gas costs, much less how its affecting the economy. We here in Wisconsin, have the every day reminders of insider Washington politics as usual devistation, to this great state, as well as the rest of our great nation, and we are ready for, and willing to clean our house, offer our support to a man who is hungry for change in the way this country treats its people, and the rest of the civilized world, a man who is willing to listen to people who know, a man who puts people before politics. Ohio and Texas? You kind of deserve four more years of the same politics as usual, and life as you know it now. Carla, In the "CHANGE " state of WISCONSIN

Zwarmeck   March 5th, 2008 9:54 am ET

Billay (Bill and Hillary) Clinton's win is mainly due to scare tactics that work. It tells us what kind of Presidency they will run once elected.

Praetorian, Ft. Myers, FL   March 5th, 2008 9:54 am ET

I'm glad to see her efforts not only redirected earlier "herd" behaviors of the Democrats–but also shined some scrutiny on Mr. Obama which is long overdue.

It will be interesting to observe how they will resume their campaigns after last night.

blair   March 5th, 2008 9:53 am ET

so, basically... all the people that voted for clinton... the people that helped her win ohio (which she will use in the convention) are people that were either scared by her tactics and/or people over the age of 65. please tell me this is not fair game to use at the convention. all because she was holding on for dear life in this race, trying at anything to win. i was once thrilled to call either clinton or obama a candidate for presidency, she has now proven me wrong. some how she has officially begun to turn the democratic party against each other. admirably , obama has kept up a pretty clean campaign compared to that of hillary recently. it is maddening to me that people over 65 years could possibly decide this election. what about the incredible amounts of youth moved by obama... to come out, support, and vote for the first time. he brought out the numbers from the beginning. because he brings out the numbers the hillary supporters are out to match it.
republicans all across texas (i know, because they are my friends)voted for clinton because they are afraid that if barack obama wins the nomination mccain will surely lose in the general election.
get out of here hillary. you are giving us a bad name.

Obama support in Iowa   March 5th, 2008 9:53 am ET

Hillary – release your tax returns!!

JT in Dallas   March 5th, 2008 9:53 am ET

Well Dr. Dreamer gets a reality check! I guess he didn't WISH and HOPE hard enough!

We want someone who will fight, did fight, can fight, and does fight. We need a strong experienced candidate.......Clinton 08!

Kevin "Kay Dee" Dennis, Los Angeles CA   March 5th, 2008 9:52 am ET

HGTV- HILLARY GOES NUTS WITH KITCHEN SINK!

Brian, Colorado Springs, CO   March 5th, 2008 9:51 am ET

Dude, she won by 3%. She was ahead by 20% just two weeks ago. She didn't "win", she hung on, barely. She needed to win by 20-30% to even start catching up. You guys know this and even reported this info just days ago. Now it's suddenly big wins? Give me a break. Media bias is out of control.

I never believed that media coverage truly affects the populace opinion until today.

Nancy   March 5th, 2008 9:50 am ET

Congratulations...."Yes we will" chants the crowd.

Cruiser66   March 5th, 2008 9:50 am ET

Hillary won Texas because, unfortunately African Americans did not show up at the polls in the large numbers needed to turn the election toward Obama. I believe African Americans are still very disillusioned with the political process and the dirty politics. Hillary was negative and obviously that's what Americans want. I had hoped that we had risen above the dirty politics and the negative slamming of oponents. Obviously, I was wrong. The world is watching and we are showing them just who we are. Too bad. I hope Obama does not get negative, even if it means he will not win the election. We need somebody in this country in a leadership position, who still has some self-respect.

Maryland

Gary   March 5th, 2008 9:49 am ET

OK Wolf, There are three things that are driving me nuts:
i) The Clinton people talk about winning the "big states" as though only they could win them in November against McCain. I think a lot more Clinton supporters would be willing to vote Obama to stop the Republicans than would swing the other way to help her. My guess is that the youth vote would stay home and the independents would go for McCain over Clinton.
ii) Why does Clinton keep claiming Michigan and Florida as victories? In Michigan hers was the only name on the ballot for heaven's sake. Has she no shame?
iii) What happened to the release of her tax return and why has the media let this slide? She put $5 million of her own money into the campaign – is earning interest paid by her own donors as income – and so her finances are very much a part of why she's still alive politically and I think people have a right to know what's going on there.

Trish   March 5th, 2008 9:48 am ET

This is a great political contest and neither candidate can win this nomination without Super Delegates. The states of Michigan and Florida also should be heard from. Their exclusion in this process is completely unfair and those states are very important in the general election. Something must be done to have their voices count. The longer this race goes on, the more apparent it is that substance will prevail over style, as it should be. Thanks for waking up America!

David, Ventura CA   March 5th, 2008 9:48 am ET

wow what a surprise the latino vote put her ahead i'm not that surprised considering mexicans out number all of us so in places like california and texas were she won it makes since and since they don't like black people they voted for her she won based on race in those 2 states by far, but in ohio she convinced people she was a fighter and went negative on obama so this women will try everything and anything to win it's left up to the remaining states to vote for change instead of more corrupt politicians like hillary..

GOBAMA 08!!

wait a minute   March 5th, 2008 9:48 am ET

Congratulations to Hillary! But I won't vote for her in the general election. This is going to be easier for McCain to win the White House.

I can understand why seniors favored Hillary to Obama, because she will force everybody to pay for health coverage. But is it going to help seniors get better health care? I think they will be disappointed.

Will illegal immigrants have to pay for their health care as well?
Since they don't exist on the paper, can Hillary force them to pay for their share?

Obama definitely was hurt by the incident with the Canadian consulate communications. Why did they initiate the invitation to Obama alone, but not Hillary's campaign? It really made me wonder why.

take off the blinders AMERICA   March 5th, 2008 9:48 am ET

You go Hillary you let them all know that it is hard to keep a good woman down!!!! I find it funny that when Obama wins it's good job Obama from his supporters but when Hillary wins it's she used fear and dirty politics to win. Her 3am ad is a clear reality of what can happen in this country!! I am proud of her and her campain they know what it takes to get the job done!!!! KEEP FIGHTING HILLARY!!!

JUST AN FYI TO THE OBAMACIANS: ALL POLITICS ARE DIRTY!!!! OBAMA'S HANDS ARE NOT CLEAN AND SOME OF YOU ARE STARTING TO SEE CLEARLY NOW!!!

Curious Jon.   March 5th, 2008 9:48 am ET

Was it just me or did anybody else hear the crowd chanting 'Yes She Will' while she was making her speech last night?

It saddens me because in my opinion that seems to show personal ambition rather than common effort in the case of Obama's 'Yes We Can'.

I am an Obama supporter and I frankly saw blood in the water before the primaries when he started facing a bombardment of allegetions in the days leading to March 3rd that derailed him off the issues and put his campaign in defense mode.

It is also amazing to also note that Older Ohio voters overwhelmingly went for her in the hopes that she would help them get their jobs back, jobs allegedly stolen by NAFTA. I wonder if they stopped to think that it was actually her husband Former Pres. Bill Clinton that launched NAFTA.

I LOVE AMERICA and all the civil rights changes it has been through but I have no doubt expressing my fears that like another user (Gurgalax) said in a previous post that it might have been a racial divide that actually called this race on Tuesday.

On a final note, the race is still on and I hope they both put on a clean fight in the days come.

acameron   March 5th, 2008 9:47 am ET

So now the press Loves, loves, loves Hillary. Does anyone want to publically question the less than credible actions and contacts of the Clinton past! Start probing! Start publishing! Be fair! Only Clinton 'leaks' are not the only newsworthy items! So sad. The title of 'slippery Bill' was not a mistake! If Hill/Bill win the nomination I will definitely vote for McCain!

Sharon from Michigan   March 5th, 2008 9:47 am ET

It's time for Barack to use his intelligence to outdo Hillary.. He needs to show that her experience level isn't any better than his. Being first lady does not constitute a Commander-in-chief. None of the candidates have experience in that job. McCain has been involved in most things, but didn't make the right decisions. Obama's intellect allows him to look ahead in situations and evaluate. Hillary wasn't a Senator before New York... Her health care plan failed under the Clinton years. She's older, but was also a part of that Washington politics that Barack wants to change, such as lobbyists, etc. The Clinton's took the towels when they left the White House for Pete's sake.. This country still needs "Change".. Bill Clinton started NAFTA, now Hillary is an opponent, just in time for OHIO.. Wake up people..

Independent   March 5th, 2008 9:47 am ET

Those voters responded to Clintons last minute negative attack ads that will only hurt the party in the general election. At least Huckabee had the decency not to use such tactics after he was down in the polls.
Congratulation Hilary for showing the world how self centered you are.

Bill   March 5th, 2008 9:46 am ET

I'm a white male, voting for Hillary. From Pa. If Hillary does not

get the Democratic nomination, then I will be voting for McCain.

Obama is just not the kind of leader I an looking for.

Racewatcher   March 5th, 2008 9:45 am ET

After all this campaigning we honestly know very little about Obama and the things we DO know point to his being a typically divisive and deceptive politician. He is not an agent of change, unless you mean changing your position to whichever way the political wind is blowing. And why is it that when matters of public record which point out these contradictions are brought out, people say Clinton is not playing fair? Not playing fair by telling the truth?

Dallas   March 5th, 2008 9:45 am ET

Will now Hillary release her tax returns like she stated in the last debate "After Texas and Ohio" she said.

Hillary, we won't forget what you said.

I wonder if the media will actually remember this.

Thanks.

taruna   March 5th, 2008 9:45 am ET

You guys in the big world of media made sure she wins..if you have any conscience left have a look at yourselves and see what you did in the last 3 days,

Its ok...after all what goes around will finally come around..

Jesse - San Antonio TX   March 5th, 2008 9:45 am ET

So the question is now:

Is Michelle Obama still proud of America?

yoshi927   March 5th, 2008 9:45 am ET

That's it, I'm moving to Vermont. :D

No, seriously. Good for Clinton. I still hope that Obama makes it through, though.

JDC   March 5th, 2008 9:44 am ET

What an amazing night .... I am glad to see the momentum swing to Hillary ... Hillary's tenacity and dedication are inspiring. It make me want to volunteer my time and effort to support her in the upcoming Pennsylvania primary ...

What a nation does when in peril?   March 5th, 2008 9:44 am ET

Today I woke up with a sickening disappointment, I woke up not wanting to watch TV anymore. Here are facts: America chose to have a candidate continue to play her dirty games over someone who echoes the hope sounding in our heart of hearts, America chose to believe a candidate who has been nothing but fake experience over someone who offers empowerment of the people. You would think we'd learn from the increase of homeless people/unemployment but you can think again.

Hilary Clinton is all tactics and strategy to win, she only wants to win no matter what and you know what, those who voted for her...deserves her and her despicable facade.

This is America for you, ladies and gentlemen.

Reid   March 5th, 2008 9:44 am ET

RACE! RACE! RACE! The Clinton strategy of defining Obama as the "BLACK" candidate paid big dividends in Ohio and Texas. The exit polls in Ohio found that 8 out of 10 voters who found race to be an important factor in their decision voted for Clinton. The black brown divide was just as strong in Texas as it was in California, Arizona, and New Mexico. Great job Hillary. Just like Karl Rove in his prime! Keep dividing the democrats and McCain will cruise to victory in November. What's next? Lawsuits over Florida and Michigan and a plea for the Superdelegates to overturn the majority of states and voters? Arrogance that defies description. "I deserve it" so lets destroy the party.

Beth B.   March 5th, 2008 9:43 am ET

There's more spin coming out of the Clinton campaign than a Texas twister. The truth is is in the numbers. Count the total delegates and there's only one winner: Senator Obama.

Independent Texan   March 5th, 2008 9:43 am ET

I am neither a Democrat nor a Republican. I am, however, keenly interested in world affairs and a devotee of the American political system. Election nights for me - even primary election nights in other states - are Superbowls that require me to watch returns and analyses until the networks cease to report.

Something happened in Texas over the weekend that has me still in a state of disbelief. What I learned from the Clinton campaign's ads and verbal pronouncements is that, should Barack Obama become the Democratic nominee, one should cast their vote instead for John McCain because Obama is too inexperienced (John McCain brings a lifetime of experience to the White House, Senator Obama has a speech he gave in 2002), he is unethical (slum landlord friend Rezco) and is duplicitous (NAFTA-gate).

Interesting. Competitors within the same party generally have slapped at each other's records ("My resume is bigger than your resume") or highlighted gaffes. They realize the risks involved in destroying each other's political reputation. Apparently this year is different. Well, it is the year of change...

Reality   March 5th, 2008 9:43 am ET

Let's not forget her fear-mongering, mud-slinging, and blame-it-on-the-media mantra...

I swear, Ohio is like Scooby-Doo. Someone yells "BOO" loud enough and they run like cockroaches. It happened in 2000, 2004, and now again in 2008.

Get ready to hate politics again, folks....

Thomas Jefferson   March 5th, 2008 9:43 am ET

Hmmmm....a few people out here eating crow today, ha? As I have said a thousand times. This race should come down to Hillary Clinton, John McCain, experience, stances on issues, plans for the country, and integrity. This race should not come down to race and superficial, wobbly rhetoric.

Garry Lemons, Arkansas   March 5th, 2008 9:41 am ET

Texas, Rhode Island and OHIO!
Thank you for coming to your senses and realizing WHO the best person to lead our country was and IS!
You finally realized that Senator Obama is a good man, a good speech giver but NOT the best one to get this country our of the mess we have been in for 7 1/2 years!
Senator Clinton is the ONLY one man enough and with the experience to get the job done.
maybe now the people of this country will ACTUALLY base their vote on experience and not gender or race.

Go Hillary!!

james   March 5th, 2008 9:41 am ET

Who won the 10% of the Republican votes cast in the Democrat primary, it would be interesting to see how they influenced this contest.

kriss g   March 5th, 2008 9:41 am ET

I think the real poll to view is how many registered republicans voted for Hillary in TX and OH? Rush Limbaugh's push should be measured, as the democrats should know if this was in fact an empty victory for Hillary. Do we have statistics on this?

Moe, Larry, the cheese!   March 5th, 2008 9:41 am ET

Who really is Railla Dinga from Kenya? What is his connection to Barack Hussein Obama? Who dares to provide a thorough investigative report on them?

Joyce, NY   March 5th, 2008 9:40 am ET

Great! She won the important blue states that the dems rely on come November. More importantly, she's won the crucial and critical swing states – Florida and Ohio (if we ever learn anything from 200 and 2004). Those are very important factors in this race.

It's really all about the candidate. No amount of money, media support, best team can cover lack of substance and weakness. I do like Obama believe it or not I just think that this is not his time yet. It's a question of electability now. Hilary have higher numbers in Ohio and Florida than McCain.

I think if Obama lose in Pennsylvania, he should seriously consider the VP spot in order to make a formidable team for the dems. The big reliable states have spoken. The only one he carried was his home state of Illinois.

Paula   March 5th, 2008 9:40 am ET

Bill,
Watching this with great interest from Canada, I feel really badly that the U.S. media has made such a HUGE deal of the Obama Nafta thing. Up here it was nothing barely making news. Obama has always said "Nafta is in need of amending" he never said anything to the contrary.
What about Clinton's husband who signed it in?/ She supported it then? She is a dirty player.. we should put her in the NHL draft and let her play some hockey up here.
Barack Obama is a decent, kind man no matter what Clinton says she can't change that!
In the words of the Late Bobby Kennedy " Progress is a nice word, but change is it's motivator-and change has it's enemies" end of quote.
In response to the 3 a.m. call.. well I would say Barack is level headed, has sound judgement and will have his two babies in the next room.. you can bet he would do the right thing no matter what the challenge.
America isn't used to seeing this kind of goodness in politics..I pray they don't let it slip away.
Paula , Canada

Tricia   March 5th, 2008 9:39 am ET

Strange how that red phone ad helped Clinton. Older Americans and women are so easily scared. As a Brit this is so noticable. In America men have gone to war but apart from Pearl Harbor and the World Trade Towers the homeland has been safe. My mother lived through bombs dropping from the sky (World War II started in 1939 for Britain), I walked to school past bomb sites left from that war in the 1950's and learned to live with the threat of bombs exploding when the Irish Republican Army was waging it's war of terror in England. I thought we might be about to see a new America. It is such a shame that the older folks and the "soccer mums" are likely to make that impossible. The younger generations deserves better.

Sharon   March 5th, 2008 9:39 am ET

Senators Clinton and Obama both have a lot of supporters, and we may be getting back to that question of a shared ticket. Although Sen. Obama's supporters surely won't agree with my opinion, I think the Democratic Party should support the continuation of the nomination process. If Sen. Obama can't convince voters that he has enough experience to address the economy, that could spell serious trouble for him in the fall. Also, the fact that a lot of his delegate advantage has been from caucuses should be a concern (that he is winning the caucuses in Texas, but not the popular vote), because there are no caucuses in the general election, and the caucuses system may have inflated his actual support among main stream voters.

Stephanie   March 5th, 2008 9:38 am ET

Clinton's win in Texas and Ohio was manipulated by the media. Clinton whined about the media being softer on Obama. Honestly I really didn't see the distinction. All I saw was Hillary whining about a ghost issue. But guess what... the media suddenly started helping Hillary look for dirt on Obama and just days before a critical election the media breaks with a story about Renzo and links it to Obama – even though Obama has not been linked to any wrongdoing. Then the media comes out with an unsubstantiated story about an Obama affiliate talking about NAFTA in Canada. Without the media pandering these two stories, Obama would have won Texas and Ohio.

bleedinheart   March 5th, 2008 9:38 am ET

So... The joke goes on.
Tearing the Democratic party apart might seem like a good thing to some but the rest of the world sees the bitterness and hate coming out of this power struggle.
The silliness of arguing about middle names, race, gender, farrakan, Wright, Muslem, (etc.) is simply "mud slinging" and is a negative reflection on America AND democracy.
The world is laughing at America and wondering why they would want a Democracy type government if this is what to expect from "elected" Senators.
Every time Clinton speaks she MUST show her contempt toward President Bush. Her snarly hate is Obvious and repulsive. Where is her respect for the "Office" of the President of the United States of America?
If a person can not respect the "Office" do they deserve to sit in it?
Not with my vote.

jp/michigan   March 5th, 2008 9:37 am ET

Hillary will go all the way. The American people finally see Obama as the calculation cunning politician he really is. The candidate for hope and change , is like all the politician in Washington , that he call the status Que. His campaign is making mistakes, hard mistakes. The media is finally taking a good look a Obama past and present, the way the have looked at McCain and Clinton. Gosh guy! Not much difference is there.

Let the Truth Be Known   March 5th, 2008 9:37 am ET

Can she be trusted what about the Taxes? and Dubai Port World Deal?

John in Charlotte   March 5th, 2008 9:37 am ET

You know Hillary, if you lose the caucus, and lose the delegates, you don't really "Win Texas."

Hillary needed to win Texas by double digits, she failed, it's over.

Obama 08

al   March 5th, 2008 9:36 am ET

was very amazed at clinton's comments giving a thumbs up for the republican candidated whilst she tore down her own party collegue. I think this is nasty politics and i am looking forward to mcCain using her own words against the democrats. Beside when the dust is settled i think the dems will take a good look at clinton and her campaign and vote against her as a sign of protest in the up coming elections.

Ray Ito   March 5th, 2008 9:36 am ET

If the Clinton camp was so negative in their strategy how come these demographics liked, and supported her?ti win? How was her 'dirty' politics able to persuade these folks?
We must not forget that the Clintons know how to play the game of national politics, and Obama does not. Hillary said from the onset that she's in to win – and win by all means.

Somebody needs to remind Obama that national politics is different from a 'religious movement' because if he doesn't realize this quickly, his support base will evaporate. Besides, the world of today is not going to play by those standards of 'turn the other cheek'. Terrorists won't turn the other cheek, and so, America will always prefer a strong leader – not a preacher.

Dallas Voter   March 5th, 2008 9:36 am ET

Why did CNN close the comments for the Texas Caucus complaints?

I was there and saw it all firsthand: total chaos, election judge NOT present, casting votes on notebook paper–AND NOBODY verifying validity of persons casting votes!

...No wonder the Democratic Party has such a problem winning–they are so disorganized!

Lissa   March 5th, 2008 9:36 am ET

No one on CNN is talking about the other 'group' that helped Hillary win Texas yesterday – The Republicans. I've heard about the Latinos and the Seniors and the Women and the African-Americans on the news all morning, but Republicans turned out in full force yesterday to vote for Hillary yesterday. We believe McCain will have a much easier time beating her than Barack. The majority of people in our line last night were Republicans against Barack. I know people all over the state that voted for her. She only won our state by 3% and we don't wonder why. Barack should feel pretty good that we were concerned enough to make the effort.

Claude Calgary   March 5th, 2008 9:35 am ET

Balonie, Texas was a tie! where was this big sweep Hillary was suppose to have. Tubbin and Blitzer are totally wrong about the change in momentum.

will   March 5th, 2008 9:34 am ET

Obamamania is ending.... Hillary may actually win this thing!

Voter   March 5th, 2008 9:33 am ET

I respect Hillary Clinton. She fights for poor people, people who do not have extra pennies for political donations, people who do not have free time to go to vote. What a difficult fight! Best wishes to her.

David, Gilbert Arizona   March 5th, 2008 9:32 am ET

Isn't Obama still in the lead with more delegates?

Eric   March 5th, 2008 9:32 am ET

The Older vote has let us younger folks down. Our country is in worse shape then ever and its time for the older generation to give us younger generation a chance. Sorry but you failed us for too long, your judgement stinks, we as young adults and our kids are in worse shape in the pas 10 years then ever before and its time for the younger generation to lead this country and we want Obama the polls show.

Brian G, Sugar Land, TX   March 5th, 2008 9:32 am ET

This election is more exciting the the Houston Livestock Show and Rodeo! Ride 'em cowboys and cowgirls.

That there trophy for best in breed ain't bin awarded yeet! Yee Haw!

Jen   March 5th, 2008 9:31 am ET

THANK YOU OHIO AND TEXAS!

AT LAST, SOME VOTES USED COMMON SENSE TO VOTE. THEY VOTED FOR SUBSTANCE NOT SPEECHES

THEY VOTED FOR EXPERIENCE

THANK YOU OHIO!!

GO HILLARY!!!

HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT!!!!!

kiran   March 5th, 2008 9:31 am ET

What I heard from some people I feel it is true. Just because of BILL CLINTON everybody voted for HILLARY. Otherwise It is OBAMA right from the beginning. This is NOT A FAIR WIN FOR HILLARY. SHE CHEATED.

Lee   March 5th, 2008 9:31 am ET

Bill, why are you still so favor for Obama? You need to be fair...
CNN really played ugly this time and you should be ashamed for yourself and shut up your big mouth.

Blayze Kohime   March 5th, 2008 9:30 am ET

Her win could also be due to overwhelming support by Republicans who didn't wish Obama to win, as Texas was an open primary. I would like to see the number of Republicans that voted if that information were available, because I know they were calling on their people to vote in the democrat primary rather than their own. Its not out of the question since there were far more voters in the democratic than republican primary if the number say anything.

Ed Barczak   March 5th, 2008 9:30 am ET

Am watching the news program with Heidi Collins and Tony Harris. The segement that they just completed with two African-Americans (a man and a woman – sure wish I could remember their names), to me, was the best presentation of the Democratic Race shown to date. Both individuals presented valid points, had given great information; and finally, neither one showed a bias to either candidate. If they were to represent one or the other, I could not tell. I will admit that I have been extremely hard on CNN during this primary seasons; however, I will be fair "CONGRATULATIONS CNN" on this televised segement; this proves that you can be neutral if you want and if you try.

clairvoyantclair   March 5th, 2008 9:30 am ET

83% of blacks voted for Obama, while 16 % supported Clinton.
67% of whites voted for Clinton, while 32 % supported Obama.
64 % of Hispanics voted for Clinton, while 32 % supported Obama.

Is anyone else seeing these 3 500 lb prejustice gorillas being ignored by the media or is it just me??

Sally   March 5th, 2008 9:30 am ET

I thought the people of Texas were Smart.

I was Wrong.

Thanks for screwing up our Country by voting for Hillary.

How could you?

california love   March 5th, 2008 9:29 am ET

Only people who believe in HEARTS, RAIMBOWS, UNICORNS, AND THE EASTER BUNNY vote for OBAMA...

Vote SMART...

MC Cain 08

joseph   March 5th, 2008 9:29 am ET

thank GOD the Barack Hussein Obama commercials will end, at least until the general election.

CLINTONFIGHTER   March 5th, 2008 9:28 am ET

HILLARY CLINTON IS A FIGHTER! SHE WILL WIN THE NOMINATION!

OBAMA LIED ABOUT NAFTA!!! WHAT ELSE? REZKO??

THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE OPENING THEIR EYES TO FOOLS GOLD!!

HILLARY 08

Eli SF Bay Area   March 5th, 2008 9:28 am ET

Memo to Mrs. Clinton, Howard Wolfson, Terry McAuliffe, et al

If you think the Clinton sleaze machine of slash and burn using fear mongering, RACE baiting, Islamophobia, questioning Obama's Christian crendetials, etc. will win Mrs. Clinton the nomination you're dead wrong!!

If by chance she does get the nomination do you think for one minute African American voters and others will forget your tactics? No, I don't think so!

Mrs. Clinton, McCain's best recruiting tool!

sKeptic   March 5th, 2008 9:28 am ET

Someone in the news media should investigate the suspicious timing of a Canadian official's disclosure of a preemptive 'conversation' with an Obama campaign economic advisor about NAFTA ... on the eve of a primary vote in Texas and Ohio ... not leaving enough time for all the details to emerge.

Could this be a favor called in by the Clinton Clan?

In politics allegations don't have to be true to have an effect, as we've learned from those sly republican tacticians.

graceann, new york   March 5th, 2008 9:28 am ET

well, congratulations hillary. you've succeeded at your goal of further dividing the democratic party, and not with your skills or much boasted experience, but with your negative campaigning that would be enough to make a republican proud. and of course, when you're ahead in the delegate count, its all about the numbers, but now that you've lost your hold on the lead, suddenly your campaign tells us to ignore the numbers that are favoring your opponent. a mccain vs. clinton general election scares me because it has the potential to be a very dirty race, as we've seen with hillary's success in that department, i doubt she'll stop the slinging it any time soon. i would love to vote democrat in the GE despite the democratic victor, but hillary, please stop all the negative campaigning because you're making it very hard for me to stand behind someone who so desparately wants to kill the movement the young generation has found in barack obama. this race should be about the issues, the qualifications and the much needed victory of the democratic party. stop clouding these important voter concerns with your devisive and manipulative campaigning.

Alaina   March 5th, 2008 9:28 am ET

It appears that seniors, Latino voters and people concerned about their financial situations are the only ones with any brains.

They know the JUNIOR senator doesn't have a clue and will have to "Google" every question that comes his way for the answer.

yemiray   March 5th, 2008 9:27 am ET

I have an advice for Obama campaign.

1. Avoid silly mistakes like that of the Candian consulate..there are too many of them cropping up days to each of your crucial primaries every now and then.

2. Tell your candidiate to learn how to fight back and go on attack when necessary. Good guy doesnt win elections. We have seen what happened to Dukakis, Kerry & Gore. Someone told me thats why the Clintons are the epitome of American politics they know when to hit back and when to go on attacks.. Soft attitudes has cost DEMS too many elections in the past.

3. If Obama can not go on attack and counter very well, then he's not worth a candidate, Hilary should be the one Because the Republicans will shred him apart in the general election if he plans to continue with the usual disastrous soft approach of the failed Dems of the past. It has fail each time.

TYSPOCK , COLUMBIA, MD   March 5th, 2008 9:27 am ET

Many thanks to the people of Texas, Ohio, and Rhode Island for putting the interest of our great nation first ! Giving what we face as a nation and a planet, we need a president able to make hope a reality ! Experience does matter, we need our best teachers, firefighter, police officer, doctors, pilots, newspersons etc etc. – Can you imagine showing up for work only to be told you have too much experience so we need to replace you with someone new because change is better? If that is the kind of change we can believe in – than we are in some serious trouble !

Nina Grey   March 5th, 2008 9:26 am ET

I'm watching CNN this morning, after Obama won Vermont, and Clinton won Rhode Island. Clinton appears to have won Ohio by 10 percentage points, and Texas by 3 at this point, with the caucuses still out and Obama leading in them by 4 points.. An interviewer talked with two people about what Clinton and Obama need to do now. The problem is, she was talking with a Republican, and a Democrat who clearly is alighed with Hilary Clinton. She should have had a third person on who was an Obama supporter. I was surprised to hear John Harris call it a good interview.

Richard, St. Paul, MN   March 5th, 2008 9:26 am ET

The 65 and over voters who are worried about their financial situation should vote Democrat this year, regardless of who wins the nomination. The Republicans have sold them out a long time ago, along with our national pride, economy and well being.

James   March 5th, 2008 9:25 am ET

Hillary's politics of sleaze won the day, but won't win the election. Hillary now says Obama could be her VP. Who is she kidding. Obama won more states, votes, and delegates. Hillary just squeaked out two victories tonight through slander.

lori altoona Iowa   March 5th, 2008 9:25 am ET

I'm telling you the media for over one month buried Hillary in negativity, most especially CNN.....Jack Cafferty is offensive day in and day out with his hatred toward Hillary....What won the election was women finally got fed up with the media bias. CNN can say whatever they want to, it was blatantly one sided. Every day I would write in and complain, most of the time, my blog comments were never put on....this is way before Hillary or SNL said anything about it. CNN helped Hillary win because the ground swelled up with anger about unfair reporting and women around the country decided that we were not going to let CNN bury her.....because of the commentators and reporters irritation with the Clintons. Your coverage was not normal election complaints. IT WAS WRONG. Women across the country will make sure that Hillary does not lose this election...but give yourselves credit because the media is the reason that people got fired up and fired back. They traveled to the primary states, they donated 35 million dollars for a reason. Wake up. You guys are giving all these polls...the media persuaded america to jump in and Help Hillary. America expects unbiased fair reporting.

jama Ohio   March 5th, 2008 9:25 am ET

Obama should step aside to Hillary. He has not won a big state yet. If he stays in the race it will be a republican in the white house.

bruce ellzey   March 5th, 2008 9:24 am ET

The polls that say Obama would score better vs McCain are in error. Insiders know that many, if not most, Latinos would shift to McCain if Obama is the candidate. This is mainly because they like McCain's stance on immigration. Add the fact that Clinton trounced Obama in Florida and it is clear that Clinton would be the stronger candidate.

Carol   March 5th, 2008 9:23 am ET

Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi 2008!!!!

jacob   March 5th, 2008 9:23 am ET

at the very most it is a tie in texas. people should remember her and her husbands land deals in arkansas, the clintons are slim. she says she is tested, lets see, she was in the white house while good ol' bill played with cigars and interns, yes that is tested. she says she is tested, she and her husband are responsible for a great number of u.s jobs going overseas with nafta, yes that is tested. a test that she will continue to lose hopefully not as president.

JB, Boston   March 5th, 2008 9:23 am ET

And didn't both Bill Clinton and James Carville say that Hillary would have to win Ohio AND Texas big?

That did not happen, Obama is still up over 100 pledged delegates and just shy including Superdelegates. It is over Hillary. If you don't bail out soon, when it comes time to meet McCain (of course that will be Barack in the general election), all he is going to have to do is say "whatever Hillary said about Obama is true"

Regardless, this in-fighting is going to ensure McCain the WH!

Satch   March 5th, 2008 9:23 am ET

Yes Clinton won Ohio, and possibly Texas. But is everyone forgetting that Obama had made up 20 points in both states giving her a run for her money in 2 states where she had a wopping lead?

Clinton has never made up that much ground in this entire campaign.

Of course she will tout her wins. But do you really think she even cares about the very people that voted for her? It's all about Hillary..
We shouldn't fall into this dangerous trap. If she ever becomes president, it would be more like Ohio who?? Texas who?? etc...

She thinks the US should be renamed, "The United States of Hillary Rodham" because she would definately drop the Clinton part after she gets what she wants.

WAKE UP AMERICA !!! Do you really want to go backwards instead of forwards.
And all the women and over 60, please reconsider your voting patterns. Let's NOT prove the theory "You can't teach an old dog new tricks" No disrespect to all the beautiful women out there.

Angelica11   March 5th, 2008 9:23 am ET

WOW!!
Finally justice is served.

Think - FL   March 5th, 2008 9:22 am ET

Amazing the groups that are on the verge of deciding which way this country heads... recent immigrants, feminists, 65+ and steel workers?

Can you say... name recognition...? And the other half of the country is dying to vote for another war hawk and relic of American politics. What the...

Time to move...

Terry, El Paso TX   March 5th, 2008 9:22 am ET

I would be happy with a Clinton-Obama ticket or an Obama-Clinton ticket. I think the two of them should flip a coin to see who gets the top spot and start running for the presidency together.

What is the obstacle? The usual one: ego. Both want the presidency desperately for their own personal fulfillment.

Clinton wants to go down in history as the first woman president and she wants to do a great job of it to make up for the problems we all remember with her husband's presidency.

Obama wants to go down in history as the first Black(ish) president, and he wants to be a new Franklin Roosevelt who saves the country from being led into a Republican-administered disaster and points the country in a new direction.

The point is, they agree on 95% of the issues and it won't change our lives very much to have him or her in the top slot.

Last night at my Texas precinct convention (sort of like a caucus), 250 people crowded into a room where only a handful met four years ago. Two-thirds of them were Clinton supporters. I was with the Obama supporters. Both groups of voters were friendly and cordial. All of us were courteous and cordial. Clinton-ites and Obama-ites were friendly, chatting with each other, and understanding of the other person's point of view. The people I spoke to said they would be happy with either candidate, though we all were enthusiastic about our own choice. It was a group of good, Liberal voters behaving the way people are supposed to behave in a democracy.

CJAM457 OH   March 5th, 2008 9:20 am ET

Being from Ohio, I think a lot of seniors here are a little colour blinded and didn't want Obama to win, they voted for Hillary in despiration and not because they think she could lead the country better, but because she was white. The media can spin this any way they'd like, but the end result was fear of having a multi coloured person win, that's why Hillary won. Let's face it folks, there's still a lot of racism in this country and it's not going away any time soon.

We'll See!!!   March 5th, 2008 9:20 am ET

That's My Girl!! Go Hillary Clinton.

Jenny   March 5th, 2008 9:18 am ET

I was totally moved by this great lady!

I can help tearing when I heard what she said last night– We're going to do it for everyone across America who's been counted out -
but refused to be knocked out. For everyone who's stumbled - but stood right back up. And for everyone who works hard - but never gives up.

I know she can, she can do this! Never give up!

Go Hillary 2008!
Hillary 2008, You are my proud! You are America's proud!

Fiyah_Startah   March 5th, 2008 9:18 am ET

Now with all fairness, Hillary should be kind enough to call up Rush Limbaugh at his radio station and personally thank him and all the other idiots who voted for her in TX and OH to tip the election and carry out, this "soap opera." It's discussing to know that so many Republicans would do such a thing, I know because people I'm close with voted for her when they're conservatives...This is too much.

JB, Boston   March 5th, 2008 9:18 am ET

Hummmmm-

People over 65 in the South. Could the remnants of a world where blacks aren't equals come into play???????

Of course not, it's Hillary's solutions!!!!

sandra lief   March 5th, 2008 9:17 am ET

i think you have it all wrong why Oboma lost,Its going around hes musslem and if we get into war with them he couldnt look at it like a white person will, the talk going around about him is very bad now, he wasnt raise in us. i see know reason hell get out of this talk.Clintons machine had friend on blogs spreading all this and it worked. he hasnt a chance now.hes not one of us.so so sad.

John   March 5th, 2008 9:17 am ET

All Hillary is doing is splitting the party, good job Hillary way to guarentee Mccain winning, Iwill never ever vote for Hillary Clinton Under any circumstances. Obama is our only hope and we still have hope even though you can go negitive for things that Hillary has done and ten time worse. Throw stuff at the wall and hope it sticks, like thats a motivating campaign, Hillary campaign of fear and hate that a really good way to motivate. Obama has the delegetes Obama has the Positive message and the backing of the people, Just because she can scare up votes in the old south and buy off with favors the union leadership including my union. People need Obama to win I don't think all you rich folks understand how mad we are out here in the real world, if something dosen't change then people are going to have another Boston tea party and it's not going to be against the British. We demand change. Bill and Hillary are not change. Barack we belive in you. At 3 am we want you maning the phone, Hillary stop splitting the party your going to ruin this country and disenfrancise our party. It's not your party, it is ours. Obama is the nominee hands down. We don't want more White water, more impeachment, more Clinton gates, that the expirence that Hillary brings thats not the kind of expirence that motivates people. Hillary we don't need your flawed judgement in our white house. Ohio and Texas it is a shame that you could be bought so cheaply with a 70's Goldwater campaign add. Shame on you folks
Clinton going on = a MCAIN win In NOV.

Robert   March 5th, 2008 9:17 am ET

These victories say a lot. She has on every big state manage to convince the people that she is the most qualified. Maybe other people should start listening in greater detail to the great thoughts that obviously have won the hearts and minds of these states.

Michael   March 5th, 2008 9:16 am ET

Has anyone heard what the Reublican turnout was for Hillary? Always interesting when the conservative Republican talk show hosts are urging their constituencies to vote for someone other than a candidate they would genuinely support.

anon   March 5th, 2008 9:16 am ET

Voters who made up their minds in the last three days in both TX and OH went to Clinton. This shows Obama is weakening. People are giving him a second look now that the media has taken off the kid gloves and their love affair with him has ended.

Even if he does win the nomination, his momentum is waning and more and more questions are arising.

People are starting to see Obama is all talk and all politics.

micki   March 5th, 2008 9:16 am ET

I THINK THAT HILLARY SHOULD RECEIVE THE DELEGATES FROM MICHIGAN AND OF FLORIDA. SHE WON IN FLORIDA AND IN MICHIGAN, OBAMA NEVER EVEN PUT HIS NAME IN ON THE BALLOT IN MICHIGAN, WHY SHOULD ANYTHING CHANGE JUST FOR HIM. IF HE CARED HE SHOULD HAVE PUT HIS NAME IN ANYWAY, KNOWING VERY WELL THAT THOSE DELEGATES SHOULD COUNT, REGARDLESS!!
YOU KNOW HE DOES NOT HAVE TO SAY ANYTHING IN HIS CAMPAIGN AGAINST HILLARY YOU ALL DO IT FOR HIM, SHE HAS TO BE A LITTLE NEGATIVE JUST TO GET PEOPLE TO REALIZE HE HAS BLEMISHES AND IF THE TRUTH BE KNOWN PROBABLY MORE. HE DOESN`T EVEN NEED A CAMPAIGN CHAIRMEN, HE HAS THE MEDIA. I AM NOT READY TO BE A MINORITY THANKYOU.

Lori Kirstine   March 5th, 2008 9:16 am ET

This comment is addressed to Jamal Simmons, CNN Democratic Strategist...

It's unfortunate that CNN allows someone with this bad an attitude, and a "poor sport" as well, to spread his personal atttacks on Hillary Clinton, on what was a great night for her!! What's really sad is that CNN allows this to continue!! Come on, CNN, let's try being impartial, at least when you're on the air!!
Jamal, get over it, she's the more qualified candidate, end of story!!

Lori Kirstine

Mike   March 5th, 2008 9:16 am ET

Obama is a liar. He said he wanted to change Washington, but he is part of Washington itself, same with Hillary. I think the one really out from Washington is John Edwards

stone   March 5th, 2008 9:16 am ET

The Clinton landslide should put Obama in his place and make him a little less arrogant. He's accomplished very little in his career that distinguishes him. He cannot win this thing!

Brian   March 5th, 2008 9:16 am ET

Delegates are the problem. With the current lead in PLEDGED delegates for Obama, Clinton basically has to "win out." Clinton's Texas Primary win was not resounding enough to make a difference in the nomination race thus far. She did close the delegate gap to less than 100. If we have these virtual ties until the end, Obama will still likely win, though Clinton could win PA and change the direction. That will be her target in the coming month. She will practically move the whole campaign to PA – it is the last of the big states, and her best hope for making up a significant lead in delegates. Clinton can close the gap with a 70/30 win in PA and ties in the rest of the states. But statistical dead heats are not in her favor. 60/40 must become the rule, not the exception for Clinton.

PA will be the true Clinton firewall. She must win there to push the delegationtowards a dead heat. Even then, when Superdelegates decide the nomination, it could fracture the Democratic party regardless of who the Superdelegates give the nomination to.

Obama has to not lose sight of what has worked for him thus far: taking the so-called high ground. He stepped down to attacks and the numbers pulled even. His camp was slow to respond to attacks in the preceding days, and as a result, he lost. Obama can't afford to lose many more battles if he still wants to win the war. It seems now he is content to play to "not lose" rather than playing to win- a dangerous strategy for such a close race.

bob   March 5th, 2008 9:15 am ET

AND THAT IS BECAUSE OBAMA SPEND TWICE AS MUCH

ON ADVERTISEMENT AND HILLARY STILL WON IN TEXAS AND

OHIO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

GO HILLARY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Confused   March 5th, 2008 9:15 am ET

Why isn't it racism when 85% of the African American vote is for Obama? No other demographic group is breaking 85% for ANY one candidate.

On the blogs, African Americans claim their vote is based on the issues. But on the issues, both candidates are very similar- with Clinton coming out slightly ahead in all polls in strengths on virtually every concern of the electorate.

So it is CLEARLY a vote based on race. Why not just own up to it?

Monito   March 5th, 2008 9:15 am ET

Good work Hillary!

Now let the flood of comments like "If Hillary wins the nomination I'll vote for McCain" begin, and Obama talks about fear 8-[
He should take a closer look at his viral campaign!

Houston Texas   March 5th, 2008 9:15 am ET

While immigration, NAFTA, health care and the economy are all very important issues; the issue that dwarfs all others is GLOBAL WARMING. Ralph Nadar / Al Gore for president!

Charlotte   March 5th, 2008 9:15 am ET

Obamas' concession speech says it all. He cannot speak without referring to AFRICA. I think the people are tired of "I did not vote for the war in Iraq." The NAFTA flub showed how he is just like what he preaches to change. Mississippi is mostly black, therfore, he most likely will win there. But, who knows for sure.....

T.M.   March 5th, 2008 9:15 am ET

I guess Hillary Clinton has once again "found her voice". Too bad it's such a negative one. All that she has accomplished is a continual divide within the democratic party, which will continue to give the republicans a greater advantage. It's time for her to put her whole personal agenda aside and look ahead to what is best for the party. Even if she wins the nomination, which is virtually impossible, she has critically damaged the integrity of the democratic party; and I hope that the superdelegates are smart enough to see this. At this rate, not only will the partisan politics continue in Washington, they will also continue within the democratic party. And that will be very sad.

Houston Texas   March 5th, 2008 9:15 am ET

While immigration, NAFTA, health care and the economy are all very important issues; the issue that dwarfs all others is GLOBAL WARMING.

juan   March 5th, 2008 9:14 am ET

The problem about Hillary winning was negative campaigning just a few days before tuesday. I believe she got a free ride with the media this time around which was very noticeable and alot of people fall into this dirty politics without doing any research about the truth and facts about eigther of the candidates. I guarantee that if more of us in this country would study and review each candidate, we would see very different results in these primaries. Remember that Clinton is a franchised name and Obama is just different so, people are going to be skeptical. Remember that Obama has been an underdog through out his campaign, he was 20 points behind in Texas and Ohio and still was a close race, yes he won 11 straight which shows that in a smaller state he can cover alot of ground so the people can be more familiar of what his message is too the people not just by what the media says. One more thing is that, I feel that the media controls these elections and they should be even on the positive and the negative of each candidate, since the media plays a great role of who will be president .

jfs   March 5th, 2008 9:14 am ET

Congrats..................Three Things;;;;;;;;;;

Taxes????
Taxes????????

Results........Where's the testimonies of the 300,000 new jobs you promised to create in UPSTATE NEW YORK during your last Senate race????? One would be suffice....

GO OBAMA

Tuturocks24   March 5th, 2008 9:14 am ET

All talk no answers Obama!

Mark, Chicago, IL   March 5th, 2008 9:14 am ET

I don't understand how the Clinton ads are negative towards Obama? The ads are asking legitimate questions – the questions being asked are the questions that I have considered in throwing my support behind Clinton.

I do not want an inexperienced novice politician as President. The nation and the world are in a critical stage and having a political novice who says alot of nice things but hasn't shown any proof he can deliver is worrysome. To me, Obama is Bush-ditto, just on the Democratic side. It can be a disaster if Obama is elected, just as Bush has been a disaster for the Republicans. At the time, it sounded good but Bush had no legitimate track record in politics so there was nothing anyone could attack against him – a plus for the campaign just as it has been for Obama. You can't contrast yourself with someone who hasn't done anything except for putting the experience and actions front and center – which Hillary has done but then gets the mantra of going "negative".

I honestly think these primaries have more to do with sexism than anything else.

Deb   March 5th, 2008 9:14 am ET

Our Prayers have been answered!

Hard work and tenacity have been American traditions from day one.

With Hillary at the helm we have a tenacious leader who knows how to work!

My take on what happened last night is where ever there wasn't a college campus or a street corner for the BO thugs to hang out and twist arms victory went to the candidate who can deliver!

Yes we can and will!

skylark   March 5th, 2008 9:14 am ET

Congratulations are in order but not to Hillary. CNN as well as other media sources are single handedly destroying any faith we might have had in fair elections. With your monster headlines every time Hillary issues an attack and no monster rebuttal when the truth is told
you are appealing to the most gullible among us.
Obviously you don't care as much about the truth as you do the headlines. Also your site is so obviously dedicated to the status quo that you are willing to burden your country with 4 more years of bleeding retirement funds, wars, poverty for the many and wealth for the few, global warming and outsourcing of jobs. There is only one reason for your bias toward Hillary and that is that she will not be able to beat McCain.
Shame on all of you.
I am an American. I do not pledge allegiance to any political party.
And neither should you.
I know you will not publish this but at least you might read it.

Hooligan   March 5th, 2008 9:13 am ET

Once again, this just proves the disparity between generations . . . I wonder how many of them aren't voting for Obama just because he is "black."

Obama '08

Cris in Texas   March 5th, 2008 9:13 am ET

This Latina gave her my vote in Texas. Hillary make us proud!!

Mel   March 5th, 2008 9:12 am ET

As shown last night the game isn't over until the last bell rings! We should applaud Hillary Clinton for her "never give up" attitude. Both Clinton and Obama believe strongly they would be the best candidate for the nomination and are willing to fight for it. I like that. Democrats are fighters and shouldn't be lambasted for it. At least, in the end they can both claim to have fought the good fight! Now, we the voters need to take a GOOD look at their records, experience, advisors, and plans, not just whats on the surface and decide who will be our next President. Go Democrats!!

Sue, NY   March 5th, 2008 9:12 am ET

It's a shame that the only way she can win is to go negative on a fellow democrat. I for one am not interested in that type of candidate. I am also not interested continuing Bush/Clinton dynasty. It's time to move on to a new direction.

Sally   March 5th, 2008 9:12 am ET

Way to go, Hillary! Keep on rocking!

Just out of curiosity, how about having a Clinton/Obama ticket for the November election? You two have it sewn up, just put your resources together. The public is speaking, and the public likes you two. Give the public what it wants - a winning ticket with two competent, likeable, intelligent individuals to be in the White House.

Phil Craig   March 5th, 2008 9:12 am ET

Hillary Clinton has proven that she's able, impressive, and presidential. However, her performance has done very little to mitigate her negatives. As a democrat, I fear that the reservoir of "Clinton hate" among republicans and independents will result in a strong ANTI Hillary vote. And in the end, an ANTI Hillary vote is the same as a PRO McCain vote. The bottom line is this... and it's something that every democrat needs to consider carefully: Hillary Clinton WILL succeed in solidifying the conservative base of the Republican party for McCain.

Odalia M. South   March 5th, 2008 9:11 am ET

I am a Florida resident and I want my vote to count. It is imperative that the rest of the country (including the media) know that we went to the polls and casted our vote. It is time for Florida officials to do the job that they were elected to do. We elected to represent us and act responsibly. They already stole one election and now they want to deny our rights. Bill you are an esperienced reporter that can make a difference in the way you deliver your reports, please support our vote. One last thing, my husband turns on to CNN but I have the remote and we have agreed that the moment any of you say "The best television team ........bla bla bla" I get to change channels. Fair?

Patrick of Albany NY   March 5th, 2008 9:11 am ET

She just keeps winning the big states.

OC   March 5th, 2008 9:11 am ET

A lot of talk about how Obama can't win the presidency without winning
big states. Please explain how Clinton can win when she only wins
rural areas and low income less educated people – traditionally areas that goes to the republican. Please explain how, even though she has adopted all of Obama's hope message, she can be a uniter and bring this country together.

NIC   March 5th, 2008 9:11 am ET

Congrats to Hillary. For all those Clinton Haters, because I know they are just getting ready to rev up the engines this morning and inject their spin on the matter. Before they start attacking her and insulting her about the primaries, that, and what ever else, she was a clear winner last night. Thats right, clear. Even thought some of the numbers apear to make it closer then what it is, just look at the voter turn out and the final vote count. Hillary, won in Ohio and Texas by more then 100,000 votes in each! I think thats alot, I dont know about you, but thats alot in one state, not a nation wide election which of course would be closer.
Im from Connecticut and Hillary lost by less then 20,000 votes. The percentages points are alot more misleading. Like Barack beat Hillary by 30,000 in Vermont and vice verse in Rhode Island. Thats closer then the percentage margin reflects. I guess it really is about perception. Look at it anyway you may. Everyone has a different take on the matter. Regardless of what I or anyone else thinks, things will go on. The question now becomes, what if Hillary wins PA? where do we go then? States like NC, IN, KY, OR etc etc might decide it or not.. But those states are in MAY! To the convention we will go! Better start racking up superdelegates, because this is increasently looking like where its heading. Oh yeah, lets not forget about MI and FL. Howard Dean and the other leading democratic are working behind the scenes trying to figure out how to some how include them. Penalize or not, votes are votes. Huge dilema now. Lets see what happens, to be continued.................

D McKee   March 5th, 2008 9:10 am ET

That's what Leadership is all about. As i mentioned earlierHe's a Sprinter but She''s a Long Distance runner. Hail to the Chief!

Scott   March 5th, 2008 9:10 am ET

So the Democratic party is being lead by the ignorant and those over 65, outstanding!!!

REDman   March 5th, 2008 9:10 am ET

Redman here
I am Native American and for Clinton. To the Obama supporters and the media that makes me a walmart democrat.
However, I am not uninformed, undeducated nor ignorant.

On the issues, Clinton wins all polls.

Clinton is true to her word about caring for the average hard-working Americans. Years back she worked on the Navajo Reservation to provide Legal counsel. I doubt any of the other candidates have ever even been on a reservation.

On popularity, Obama leads.
Vote the issues.

Jan   March 5th, 2008 9:10 am ET

Go Hillary!!! keep the momentum going.
Keep fighting!!! We know you are a great fighter that's why you are the Senator of New York. Can't wait for this to end and see you emerge as the Nominee for our great Democratic Party.

Jennifer   March 5th, 2008 9:08 am ET

She's played the game the same way Obama has...Deal with it..... He printed and sent out misleading flyers in Ohio on her campaign. She brought to attention the "flip-flopping" going on concerning the NAFTA conversations. If Obama and his campaign had that same type of information on Clinton they would have jumped at the chance to use it.

He requested the polls stay open 2 hours late in the BLACK cities, i.e. Cleveland, Toledo, Cincinatti.. due to bad weather....so those are the only cities in Ohio that faced bad weather last night?!?!?! He's playing the race card as much as the next person. He knows he NEEDS that black vote. The fact is he can't win big states...He hasn't won big states and that's a legit issue his team needs to identify and figure out if he wants to win in Nov. McCain is winning them all. The little states he's won are red states....he has cross over republicans voting for him in large numbers.....please don't be so blind to believe that's due to people jumping on the Change hype..Those same repubs or many of them will cross right back over in Nov and vote McCain. Pay attention to the 04 election with Kerry..The same thing happened and that's Obama's fan....go figure...

So everything is okay when the Obama team uses it...It's justified...
When it's Clinton's team...it's lying, dirty...Guess what people...Obama is using the same "good ole" politics he's trying to say he's above...Just b/c it's a smoother, prettier package doesn't mean it's still not isht.

No she shouldn't drop out of the race. You don't enter a race to not see it all the way to the end. There are 12-13 more states left. These two aren't running to be President of the 40-42 United States of America...They want all the states to vote and they should. The people living in the states left to vote should want their fair chance to be heard. It's insane to suggest she drop out and then say for the betterment of the party...Please...If he's so concerned about the party, he should be the "bigger man" and step aside...Since clearly people still want to vote for her. People still feel she can be the leader....And people aren't stupid...don't downplay her winning to she played the fear card.....and if she did...SO WHAT!?!? She just played it before Obama could.

We should be fearful of our country's state of well-being. We should be fearful of what's going on in the world, our colleges, high schools, homes, etc....She didn't play on a fear that isn't real.

In their speeches last night. She mentioned the ways she's different from Obama's campaign WITHOUT naming him directly. He put her right out there with McCain...He's the one not caring about joining the party....He can disagree with her ways without naming her directly. That way there's no divide in the party. People need to look at the bigger picture. Not voting for Hillary if she wins is insane. Hillary is NOT worse than another 4 yrs of a repub..Obama fans, stop being selfish and unite the party gracefully if your candidate doesn't win. As Hillary fans should do as well. The main objective is to NOT have another repub in office....PERIOD!!!!

Last- it's easy for Obama to say he opposed the war...He wasn't in senate to vote for the war so his "opinion" which is all it is, doesn't matter. He gets no applause for that...He couldn't vote and since he couldn't vote he has no way of knowing how he truly would have voted at that time once he was presented with the opportunity. He wasn't privy to the same sentate info and reports those made their decisions based on...Hillary voted for the war ONLY after the inspections team was complete and as LAST resort....She nor anyone else had any indication their PRESIDENT would go against the grain...She believed in her President as she was supposed to do...

david   March 5th, 2008 9:07 am ET

Not a big deal. it is just a win not a big win. In Tx Obama will get more delegates. she running a negative campaign. She is saying Obama is Muslim. she playing race and religion card at this time. but still i dont think she will close the delegate gap. one thing is sure. for clintons, if they dont win, they a republican in white house. people have seen how dirty campaing she is doing.

Mike   March 5th, 2008 9:07 am ET

What happen to all the talk by the media that Clinton had to win big (70%) in Texas and Ohio to stay viable as a candidate? I have hear nothing to explain why her close wins are now considered a "BIG" win.

Alice M . Burns   March 5th, 2008 9:07 am ET

When I opened my email this morning, there was an offer to me of a free coupon worth about $4.00 if I would vote for Hillary Clinton in the general election. I am insulted by this shameful offer to think that someone thinks my vote could be bought. No telling what all she offered to the Latinos. Ratz to Hillary Clinton from me.

Sherry   March 5th, 2008 9:07 am ET

Dont get me wrong...I like Hillary and if not for Obama, I would vote for her. That being said – how many of the "democrat" vote in Texas were republicans doing just as rush limbaugh suggested?

Folks dont let dirty politics keep screwing the American people!

Madona   March 5th, 2008 9:06 am ET

It is a good thing that Sen. Hillary Clinton won Texas and Ohio, the next big challenge for Haillary will be miss and wyoming which Hillary atleast should win about 40% of the vote to catch up with Obama.

Adam   March 5th, 2008 9:06 am ET

While Clinton and Obama are very similar on policy, some of the Clinton supporters are adamant in supporting "her experience" in bringing about those policies. In fact, her history and experience will only do one thing – she will galvanize the Republican Party and we will be gridlocked. There is a deep disdain for her that will polarize this county like we've not seen in some time.
I'm afraid Democrats will lose the majority in the House and Senate with Clinton in office and nothing will get done. Why can’t people predict this simple reality? 20 years of Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton. Really? Is that the best we can do? Go Obama for America and the world.

me3   March 5th, 2008 9:06 am ET

Seniors are more realistic, and I guess we have to give them the "wisdom" of their years. Voters also realized who actually has a plan to get them out of this financial crisis, and the late deciders finally saw Obama's kinks once he really had to face the "tough" questions. I hope it's not too late to turn this thing around.

OhioNate   March 5th, 2008 9:06 am ET

Clinton won Ohio thanks to the REPUBLICANS who answered Rush Limbaugh's plea to destroy the primary. These same REPUBLICANS will vote for McCain in the general election. Hardly a victory for Clinton, although at this point she'll take any vote she can get.

Obama wants to change the way things are done in Washington, but can he get there without flinging poo back at his opponent? He appeals to the educated, but it is the uneducated, trailer park Jerry Springer likes who vote for poo flingers. Add to that the Limbaugh Republicans, and it becomes a tough win. Will Obama deliver the knockout punch, and will it be by remaining honorable and dignified, or will he stoop to the lowness of Washington politics as usual?

Phyllis/ PA   March 5th, 2008 9:06 am ET

If ever there was a reason to vote for Hillary, people got one last night. She kept her chin up and campaigned hard in spite of the media and a string of losses. This should prove that she can handle the job of president.

A proud Hillary supporter in Pennsylvania. Yes, Pennsylvania is ready and waiting for you to knock Obama off his pedestal.

Phil-1   March 5th, 2008 9:05 am ET

Texas caucus – some elder people were scammed out of there vote as reported by fox news. CNN should check into this story.

Oh Really   March 5th, 2008 9:05 am ET

Fear, tricks and negative ads win again. Is this REALLY what we want for the future of America?

Yes We Can!   March 5th, 2008 9:05 am ET

We the people control the outcome of this race. Dirty politics won a few battles, but the war will be won by those of us who believe in real POSITIVE change in America.

Ann   March 5th, 2008 9:05 am ET

If Clinton gets the ticket...I'll have to become a Republican REAL QUICK! "My Friends...."!

Vivian   March 5th, 2008 9:05 am ET

Hillary won the way the Clintons always win. Dirty politics! fear mongering, untrue statements, spinning information, running wild with negative rumors, etc.... Hillary is only getting votes fromn people who are lazy and don't want to make change. It's more like "let's just go with a familair name so we on't have to participate and we can just be spectators". That is the attitude of people who are afraid of taking on too much work to make change. We need to get more involved in our goverment and not less. The name that is familiar should not decide who we elect. We are the ones who are responsible to help make changes in our lives. We cannot depend on self seeking politicians to move us forward. Hillary has a terrible record of voting in the senate, she has lawsuits against her that would prove the crook that she is, but people are familiar with her name so they just voe fo rher. That is so stupid! I will voe for MCcain if Hillary is the nominee.

Jan17   March 5th, 2008 9:05 am ET

Welcome to the big leagues Obama, Good job Hillary. Obama she kicked your butt. You are a liar. Thank god people woke up and realized you are not the one to lead this great country. Stop stealing ideas, get your own. Answer tough questions,. Oh I forgot you don't like the media ( refs) as you called them. Hillary went negative on you, that was by your own doing, oh but wait everything ugly that comes out aganist you it's Hillary fault. Are you accountable for anything? NAFTA/Canada, first you didn't know, then you did know. Your the same washington . Hillary is tough baby can't touch that. What does CHANGE mean to you? You can't seal the deal, you can't win the big states.
Michelle are you still proud of your country. awwww.

Stamford   March 5th, 2008 9:04 am ET

Why hasn't the question been raised as to why Obama has failed to unite the Democratic Party? Is he being carried only by the African-American vote ?

Also, why isn't it being reported as to what the delegate count would be if Florida amd Michigan were counted ?

CNN...will you posted these questions ?

J. McKinney SW MO   March 5th, 2008 9:04 am ET

However she did it–thank God she did it. Now we need to keep on like this or better. GO, HILLARY!! I think some of the slow learners are starting to catch on about Obama.

wycliffe   March 5th, 2008 9:04 am ET

No more lations in play for Clinton and the race ahead looks favorable for Obama.

Charlotte   March 5th, 2008 9:03 am ET

She won because she is the best choice period!!!!!!!!

bonnie j   March 5th, 2008 9:03 am ET

hillary is real not fake , she is the one to help this country to get back on its feet. cnn. will you show jack nickolsons add on endorseing her, it is great, and obama put one out with jack counter acting him. i feel obama should not of done this , jack is endorsing hillary not obama ,so now he is trying to steel her emdorsements. hillary has a chance and obama cant admit it, i hope you can cnn. cnn. lets get real , time to start talking about whats up with rezko , and why would he vote present on protecting our children from sexual preditors.

D R   March 5th, 2008 9:03 am ET

Demographics suggest Latino voters, and the under educated are deciding whom we should run for president! That makes me even closer to jump to the republican ticket!

Dan   March 5th, 2008 9:03 am ET

The Clintons are like VD on the body politic – it never goes away.If she is the nominee I just won't vote. I can't immagine that people really want to continue with a devided government. With Bill out of control in public housing again. With the tabloids being the leading edge of the news again. It has been said that Obama is vague but we know already what they are like. Don't be fooled that somehow they will bring back the 90's. The 90's weren't that great and all they will bring back is the bad stuff.

HILLARYman   March 5th, 2008 9:03 am ET

Clinton has been screwed by the media since the start of the election process. if that were not bad enough, the media then tried to paint her and Bill as racists. Give me a break! African Americans then played that race card to the hilt. Then the young- who have never voted before and may never vote again, began a love affair with likeable Barack. If NOT for all of that, on a level playing field, based solely on the issues, she would be way ahead of Obama by now.
It may be too late for her to catch up after the unfair handicaps. But the truth is, the CORE Democratic base is staunchly BEHIND Clinton. The Democratic party has to take that into account with regard to Superdelegates. The Superdelegates are intented to retain the nomination of the party nominee to the votes of the registered party members/voters. Crossover republicans and independents have less of a say in who the democratic nominee is, then the registered democrats do. In that very important way, Clinton is ahead.

Marlene Deutsch   March 5th, 2008 9:02 am ET

I've lived in Rome, Italy for over 30 years, and this is the first time I've been so excited about an American presidential campaign. I've been watching Obama with interest ever since his famous convention speech some years ago when I was so favorably impressed by him. I think it would be wonderful were he to get the nomination for all the obvious reasons, but most of all, for what it will do for the image of America abroad. We are not popular right now in Europe because of Guantanamo & tales of kidnapping & torture, Iraq, the Calipari fiasco, special anti-terrorist laws that spy on the American people & for other reasons.
However, for the first time, if the other candidate (Hillary) gets the nomination, I won't tear my hair out. She's a very valid, intelligent & knowledgeable candidate & has a lot going for her, but she surely does not representative the "new" as Obama does, except for the fact that she's a woman. My concern is beating McCain, & I have a gut feeling that Obama has a better chance of doing so than Hillary. If the idealists outvote the cynics, Obama will get the nomination, if not, I won't have difficulty voting for Hillary, but opposing a true war hero is not easy for anyone, much less for a woman or a black man.
In closing, if people come to realize that despite McCain's sympathy & obvious expertise regarding war & his courageous stand against torture, which he knows all about, his policies mirror those of his predecessor, then perhaps the Dems have a chance...
Thanks for giving me an opportunity to sound off! Best, Marlene Deutsch

Timothy B. Robinson   March 5th, 2008 9:01 am ET

I LOVE TEXAS, OHIO, AND RHODE ISLAND!!! GO HILLARY!!!

WS   March 5th, 2008 9:01 am ET

It's very impressive that Obama congratulated Clinton on her wins yesterday, especially after she refused to acknowledge his wins during the past few contests. It shows that he isn't into politics as usual.

I do have to respectfully disagree with the evaluation of how Clinton won... she won through the use of fear tactics and negative campaigning, and pulling everything out of the "kitchen sink".

Go Obama! Keep working to unite the Democratic Party!

Disappointed Texan   March 5th, 2008 9:01 am ET

Hillary would not have won Texas if it were not for the Latino vote. They can't wait for socialized health care!

It was close....Obama supporters showed their stuff...way to go!

D.   March 5th, 2008 9:01 am ET

People start to see the true color of Obama. He's no other than the same old politicians. That's why the later deciders overwhlemingly voted for Hillary last night. People, please continue the trend!

When I watched Obama's speech last night, I felt his speech was even more empty than ever. The first time I heard his speech was the night when Hilllary won New Hampshire. I had to admit that I got inspired. I thought he's gave a very good speech, and was actually thinking I needed to reconsider my vote. However, as time goes on, his speech is still are just words, change, change, ... nothing else, and day after day I feel his speech is emptier and emptier. I'm certain now that I won't vote for empty words.

Heather   March 5th, 2008 9:00 am ET

I think it is horrible how Hillary is running. She is using the same fear tactics and might I add same ad that John McCain used in September. Why also is anybody not talking about Mark Penn and who he runs company's with. He is in cahoots with Glaxco SmithKline and even HALLIBURTON. Hillary is bent on getting whatever she wants she is unprofessional. Using satuday night live quotes to start debates. Listen if you whining about getting the first question I have some news Hillary when your president you get the first question all the time. Please stop your campaign. If she is the nominee I will vote for Ralph Nader and If she gets elected I will stop watching television and looking at the internet. And running on the curtails of your husband does not stand for a lifetime of experience. If that was the case Ellinor Roosevelt should have run. Only experience she has is scandal and manipulation. Wall Mart board and what about her illegal campaign funds she raised over 4 billion in one night with no payment to hollywood performers. If she wasn't such a great lawyer she and her husband probably would have been in jail! She is old politics , old washington, There are so many sinister things in our future we need someone who can stand up for us not fall in line. What about her IRAN vote. SHE STINKS! SHAME ON YOU HRC! I'm never voting democrat again if she gets the nomination.

LIZ Keesee   March 5th, 2008 9:00 am ET

If Michigan and Florida were counted, wouldn't Hillalry Clinton be far ahead in total votes(popular votes) and be entitled to the super delegates by Obama's rationale?

Moe, Larry, the cheese!   March 5th, 2008 9:00 am ET

Media-"could you please tell us more about Rezko Senator Obama?"
Obama-"I already answered like 8 questions, I am outa here."

Can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.

If you think thing are heating up for Obama, wait until the Republicans get him fully in their sites, they will peal him like a rotten banana.

Ted in Pittsburgh   March 5th, 2008 8:59 am ET

sentence should read: "The power is yours..."

Mike   March 5th, 2008 8:58 am ET

CNN people say the red phone ad is negative. I don't think so. I do not see anything negative in it at all. The negative stuff came from Obama himself: the Rezco trial and the Canadian Consulate meeting. This negative stuff put a big question mark in front of us: Is he really a new type of politician?

Dian Mo   March 5th, 2008 8:58 am ET

Clinton's Texas/Ohio/Rhode Island win leads to the recovery of the momentum of her campaign. It is good for Americans to have more time to think if Obama could be better politician in real or just in mouth.

Comparing with the success of EU (European Union) in the last half century, people of USA should understand that there would be more opportunities for USA and Canada if there would be an EU style relationship between two countries. Then USA and Canada should follow the example of EU treats East European countries to establish the graduation system to help Mexico up. The NAFTA is just the beginning of such relationships.

The young people of USA should understand the following two facts:

1.) Obama is the same politician as the other candidates, to whom Obama is criticizing.

2.) Obama could not be the leader for the 21st century based on his politics view on NAFTA. If the president of USA could not understand the importance of how to deal with two closed neighboring countries, how could your next president help USA to return to the leadership position of this world?

carlo   March 5th, 2008 8:58 am ET

Okay, Bill and all of the people who will flood this comment post with "go Hillary". People in Ohio are extremely racist. I have relatives who live there, and they say that Ohio is one of the most segregated places in the country. It is a proven fact that the more uneducated someone is, the more likely they are racist. In addition, the older someone is, the more likely they are racist. That is why Obama is leading among the educated and the young. We see past race, and look at the character of an individual. That awful comment the Hispanic lady made in Texas about Obama was distasteful, but, unfortunately true.

We have to accept the fact that until the baby boomer generation dies out, we will never have real change in America. They are going to keep minorities (yes, that includes you, too, latinos) for as long as possible. For proof, look no further than the fact that Ohioans voted for the woman who has championed NAFTA! They say that their number 1 concern is the economy! That speaks volumes to me.

As far as Obama getting large majorities of the Black vote, white candidates (including Bill Clinton) have been getting those votes for years, even with people like Sharpton and Jesse Jackson voting.

I have talked with a lot of people today, and the consensus is clear: If the superdelegates take this from Obama and give it to Hillary, we hope she can win in November without us because if Obama is out, all of the enthusiasm you see will be redirected to the Republicans, and his supporters will stay home and watch you lose more of your children in Iraq and more of your blue collar jobs.

Ted in Pittsburgh   March 5th, 2008 8:57 am ET

Congratulations, Hillary. Your negative campaign seems to have resonated with many of the voters of Texas and Ohio. By the time the Texas caucus is counted, your victory will be entirely pyrrhic, as you will not have made a dent in Obama's delegate lead. The power is your to take this all the way to Denver so that the race can be decided by superdelegates in backrooms, rather than by the people. I predict you will sue for redos in Florida and Michigan, even though you and Senator Obama pledged to abide by rules of the Democratic National Convention. You will do anything to win, regardless of the consequences. You will single-handedly destroy the Democratic Party. If, you somehow manage to literally steal the nomination from Senator Obama, you will convert tens of millions of young, energized Obama democrats into McCain republicans.

Gary   March 5th, 2008 8:56 am ET

CNN Stated Tuesday that who ever looses Texas and Ohio should drop out. I think it's time for CNN to start backing up what that say.

Mr. B.   March 5th, 2008 8:56 am ET

Uhhh, I thought Hillary was supposed to win by 20 to 30 % in Texas ?

It's my understanding it's so close she actually may not win as many Delegates ?

As far as Ohio, the margin became less and less all night.

You should look at the differences between each candidates win loss margin. Hillary has only beat Obama by more than double in (1) One state. Obama has beat Hillary by more than double in (10) ten states.

It's all in the numbers !

America Is Ready
Obama 08

Alex   March 5th, 2008 8:56 am ET

It really was a set of convincing wins for Sen. Clinton. Voters are now beginning to think their positions and are seeing through the speeches of Sen. Obama. He is definitely an outstanding speaker, but he must now be more specific about his policies and plans of action if he wants to regain his momentum. If his camp is complaining about the allegations hurled at him, they must know that this is nothing compared to what it would be like in a national campaign against the Reps.

Andrea H.   March 5th, 2008 8:54 am ET

I watch Cnn because you report most comprehensively and quickly...However, I am at the end of my rope listening to your analysis of the analysis of the analysis....Why are you so unwilling to present ALL the possi bilities?! Like it is still possible for Senator Clinton to win the nomination!. In almost every instance, you diminish Hillary and buoy up Obama....It seems you are more interested in telling people how you think it should be rather than how it is....If you are the best political team on TV...we are in trouble....we need nonprejudice, factual, critical thinking, fair and creative reporting.....oh, and why all the talk about a black president and it's almost a secret that Hillary is a woman...how about addressing the prejudices about that?!

Paul   March 5th, 2008 8:53 am ET

Bill, do you really think that the Republicans who voted for Senator Clinton to keep the race alive in favor of John McCain are going to tell the exit polters what they did. I have a gut feeling that alot of conservatives voted for Hillary, not because they like her, but to give Senator McCain an edge for multiple reasons. I know it happened because they were bragging about it multiple conservative radio talk shows yesterday.

Ryan, Houston TX   March 5th, 2008 8:53 am ET

Hillary Clinton is running a "politics as usual" campaign. She's tried to scare up votes with the red phone commercial and the appearances on SNL and The Daily Show were transparent attempts to appeal to young voters. During a previous campaign, Bill Clinton was quoted as saying "Give me hope or give me fear, I'll take hope any day." And now his wife is running against hope. As a Texan, I'm completely disappointed in the outcome of the election here. And I know one thing, should Senator Clinton take the nomination, this Democrat will be voting for McCain. I may not agree with him on the issues, but he's a person I can respect...and his pollsters don't have to tell him where he stands on a given issue.

Tom, Iowa   March 5th, 2008 8:53 am ET

Don't forget Rush Limbaugh asking Republicans to vote for Hillary! On 1200 am in San Antonio last night, Republicans were calling in saying that they "switched for Hillary."

What a joke!

sky   March 5th, 2008 8:53 am ET

She needed to win by a huge margin in order for it to make any significant difference. All Barack needed was to stay close in those states and he did more than that. People, most especially the media, forgot that last week in order for her to stay alive she had to win by double digits. She needed something much more than this to overcome the significant Obama lead. It only prolonged the inevitable.

JR from Philadelphia, PA   March 5th, 2008 8:53 am ET

Know this, HIllary Clinton: You "won" by engaging in GOP-style politics of desctruction and fear-mongering, the same tactics used by Bush Rove et al. By having to resort to "going negative" on Barack Obama, you've proven you have no real record to stand on. Will you finally release your tax returns so you can be available to the same scrutiny as Sen. Obama? Should you go on to obtain this nomination, you will not be rewarded with my vote and I suspect a lot of other Americans who are sick of politcs-as-usual feel the same way. Now excuse me while I go make another donation to Sen. Obama's campaign.

RFI Santa Rosa CA   March 5th, 2008 8:53 am ET

Reasons for the late deciders' choice of Hillary? Add CNN and other media who gleefully hyped the minor Obama issues the Clintons sought to make into big negatives. CNN gets to keep covering an exciting race and democrats are less likely to win in the fall.

Michiel W   March 5th, 2008 8:52 am ET

I have been watching this race from the beginning. Senator Clinton had a rather large win in Ohio & Rhode Island last night and a 3% win in Texas. Millions of people voted in these states. Yet I just heard Senator Obama on CNN saying (paraphrasing here) I still have more delegates so it doesn't really matter if Senator Clinton won! Is Senator Obama saying the rest of the primaries are irrelevant? Isn't the reason for the superdelegates exactly what is happening now? When the race is so close, they are the tie breaker? And how exactly will the superdelegates be dispersed? If you won the state, should the delegates (superdelegates) go to the person who won the state, or be dispersed proportionally? Also, still wondering where the popular vote stands, if anyone has the info would appreciate knowing. I find the delegate apportioning somewhat disturbing, when one candidate can win the popular vote and the other get more delegates!

Kathy   March 5th, 2008 8:52 am ET

Obama will sweep up in Wyoming and Mississippi. If the Democrats allow the superdelegates to nominate Hillary and overturn the will of the people, they will lose the youth vote, the minority vote and the Independent vote, reinforcing the cynicism that is so prevalent in todays political realm.

Nonetheless, I must say that i have learned a great deal from the Democratic party throughout these primaries. It turns out that Democrats are just as racist, intolerant and closed-minded as Republicans. The similarities should provide some comfort to the Democrats that will be stuck with John McCain as their president in November!

LifeLongDemocrat   March 5th, 2008 8:52 am ET

This is the real role of the superdelegates: who can bring in the large states, the ones that win elections? Hillary can and they should come to her aid and give her their votes. Howard Dean should call Hillary and Obama in and make her the presidential nominee and he the VP. This will set up a Democratic dynasty for the next 16 years...go Dems!

If they want to lost votes to McCain, give the nomination to Obama, 25% of Clinton voters will go to McCain, ensuring a Republican win.

Make the right choice Dems (DNC)!

Kate   March 5th, 2008 8:51 am ET

Oh yea, it is up to PA now!!! We are the ones to make the difference... and talk about change......I think finally the voters are listening to the words of the candidates and hearing exactly what is being said by whom.... Go Hillary, Pa loves you...............

ny independent   March 5th, 2008 8:51 am ET

Wait, here's a novel idea. Perhaps, and I'm just guessing here, that Hillary won those states because her capabilities outweigh those of Senator Obama, at least for the voters in those states.

Not fear.

Not "stealing" the election.

Not negativitiy.

Just, that many think she's the better candidate. Many, dare I say it, are inspired by her. Senator Obama does not have the corner market on the idea of change and inspiration. If Obama supporters are under the illusion that there are no Hillary supporters, then they are sorely mistaken. I'm not saying that she'll get the nomination. I'm just saying that there are millions of Americans who support her far more than they do Senator Obama.

Let this contest go on and see what the voters have to say.

Even if either candidate won by large margins the remaining states, neither of them would have enough pledged delegates to secure the nomination. It's going to come down to the superdelegates. Let's just see what happens.

Linda   March 5th, 2008 8:50 am ET

I have some concern that the politics of fear won in Tuesdays' elections.
Many of us see thru these negative ads and yearn for an America where political differences are debated with respect and intelligence.
Please, no more red phone ads, no more insinuations about peoples' names–we are a better people than this. With the two Democratic candidates in agreement regarding most issues, I will vote for the one whose leadership style most closely resonates with me. I want a leader who is visionary,intelligent and unifying. The details can be worked out under his leadership by the policy wonks. We desperately need Barak Obama.

Amy in Iowa   March 5th, 2008 8:50 am ET

Thank you Texas. Obama scored big. There was no firewall for Hillary. She is way behind in delegates. Even with her dirty politics and mudsling, Obama supporters keep moving forward.

B. Smart   March 5th, 2008 8:50 am ET

Hillary lost the texas caucus 52-48. She won the state by 4 pts. Big Deal.
Its the delegates that count. But I guess Hillary will take the word "win"
any way she can get it. She also had help from the media in trying to
tear Senator Obama down. Speaking of media, They have now hyped
her as the momentum candidate. It is now her turn to be stabbed in the
back by the media. Watch how the Clinton scandals from the past emerge since it is her turn to be "dethroned". Its all a big media game.
In the mean time, I will get my real unbiased information from CSPAN.

Greg, NY   March 5th, 2008 8:50 am ET

How about the fact that she was up 20 points just a month ago? That might have had something to do with her win last night.

Also, how were there so many undecided voters, this campaign has been going on for the last 14 months. You'd think that would be enough time to make a decision.

These same people are only going to have a few months to make a decision on a general election candidate, so good luck to them.

Wambi   March 5th, 2008 8:50 am ET

She won by pushing out lies and fear mongering.
Give me abreak, this is the next president after having gone to war on a parc of lies. These old folks are fearful and manuplatable.

bennie   March 5th, 2008 8:50 am ET

Go Hillary..."never underestimate the intelligence of the voters"...you are so smart. You really deserve to be the nominee!!!

Les   March 5th, 2008 8:49 am ET

As a Barack supporter, I and my candidate want to say congratulations to Senator Clinton eventhough she has never afforded us the same in our string of 11 victories. It is okay, we know she is petty and has not honor. We know she is unwilling to thank states where she is not the winner because they are somehow not worth her time. I am scared though, if she gets the call at 3 am and there is something happening in a state that didn't go to her in the election, is she going to hang up the phone and go right back to sleep? Is she really in it, to win it, FOR the American people?

Now, I want to say that there was a media bias there for awhile because the Clinton's kept shooting themselves in the foot, but does it make since to turn the media focus simply because she is whining about it and digging up all the dirt. I ask the media to actually start reporting the facts so that the American people and HRC supporters may educate themselves as to the lack of integrity and honesty held by Hillary and her campaign. Here are a couple topics of investigation so you don't have to do the thinking yourselves: Paul v Clinton, Federal Election Fraud; Clinton tax returns; Clinton White House documents release; Clinton's voting record in Senate (votes 13-15 in Senate session S 2248); Clinton vs Obama voting record this year, oh I will do the work for you it is 3 vs 11, she just doesn't like to show up to make decisions; ........

Sarah C   March 5th, 2008 8:47 am ET

Why are all these reporters making it seem like a last-minute Clinton win? She's been up in the polls in Ohio and Texas for weeks – only three weeks ago she had a 20 point lead in Ohio. The polls got closer and closer, and the election was a tight race, but it's not as if Hillary suddenly picked up steam or momentum. She simply managed not to lose the states which were her's to lose from the beginning.

matt   March 5th, 2008 8:46 am ET

congrats Hillary, but it was a not a huge margin win, it's amazing to see Obama match upto her in Texas & almost close in Ohio. Considering the fact that Obama is new, and people know Hillary for a long time. So, that's something we need to consider. I think Hillary's negative & false attacks on the final day might have been the reason that she won Ohio. However, AMericans should understand that politicians are willing to do just abt anything, just to win the votes. Atleast Obama is honest in what he says & what he does. I think Obama will win Mississippi and the rest of the states, and be the nominee in the end, and eventually will be the President, because with McCain we will probably have a 3rd term of Bush. Please should understand that, and they will probably be happy to run against Hillary, because it's easy for them. Obama is the only candidate that can make AMerica safer both economically and military wise. I do respect Hillary & McCain, but in reality it's Obama that can bring Real Change that people want. Please post my comments

deeanna jacobs   March 5th, 2008 8:45 am ET

HILLARY 08 is certainly the come-back kid on March 4, 2008
Just the beginning. Hillary Rodham Clinton will beat Barack Hussein Obama by a large margin again in Pennsylvania

Go HILLARY we are waiting for Pennsylvania

matt   March 5th, 2008 8:44 am ET

congrats Hillary, but it was a not a huge margin win, it's amazing to see Obama match upto her in Texas & almost close in Ohio. Considering the fact that Obama is new, and people know Hillary for a long time. So, that's something we need to consider. I think Hillary's negative & false attacks on the final day might have been the reason that she won Ohio. However, AMericans should understand that politicians are willing to do just abt anything, just to win the votes. Atleast Obama is honest in what he says & what he does. I think Obama will win Mississippi and the rest of the states, and be the nominee in the end, and eventually will be the President, because with McCain we will probably have a 3rd term of Bush. Please should understand that, and they will probably be happy to run against Hillary, because it's easy for them. Obama is the only candidate that can make AMerica safer both economically and military wise. I do respect Hillary & McCain, but in reality it's Obama that can bring Real Change that people want.

go ohio   March 5th, 2008 8:44 am ET

i knew i could count on some common sense from my state
WAY TO GO OHIO
as ohio goes,so goes the country
obama wont get in there even if he gets the nomination
and this proves it
<3way to go america

kenneth obanor   March 5th, 2008 8:43 am ET

ARE AMERICAN BLIND AND DEAF?

This is the big question i and so many people arround the World keep asking ourselves.
Denying Barack Obama at this crucial moment of America history of the ticket to be the president of the united state of America is largely undermining her unstable internacional relationship with the middle east, Russia, and most countries that are presently having a cold war with the United States.

The policy of not wanting to engage in democratic and peaceful dialogue with the so called America enemies which has been endermic in Washington for decades is tearing the whole country down. What the US need at this time is a president that is able and willing not only to unite the country but also to create a good image with the outside World. All over the World there have been reactions from people from all Works of life expecting a “change we can believe in”. A change that will not undermine the peace we all are waitng for in the middle-east., a change that can beef-up relationship with cuba, venezuela, north korea and so many country that constitute themselves enemies not of the US but of Washington.
Americans cannot say they are not seeing and litening to the popular reaction of the internacional communitee.

Barack obama fill this gap of that president that can deliver the US at this critical situation.

Kenneth

Spain.

Mark   March 5th, 2008 8:43 am ET

It's really a shame that this race has to stretch on longer, while the Republican party is united and starting their run toward November. These 2 are doing nothing but dragging the party down.

I also think that the votes to this point show Clinton's divisiveness and are indicative of how many people just flat out despise her. She cannot win against McCain, even though he is directly tied to Bush. She should just quit, and let the Democratic party have a real chance in Novemeber. Otrherwise, we're going to have 4 more years of Bush 2.0

Carol from CT   March 5th, 2008 8:43 am ET

I think the VOTERS are speaking. Now if the media would leave off with their retoric and let the Voting public at large finally have their say we could all get some rest at night. The public at large is not stupid. They know whats wrong in this country and with our government and they will have the confidance to VOTE for the Canidate that will has the most experience to begin to repair the problems that have worsened over the last eight years.

kenneth obanor   March 5th, 2008 8:42 am ET

ARE AMERICAN BLIND AND DEAF?

This is the big question i and so many people arround the World keep asking ourselves.
Denying Barack Obama at this crucial moment of America history of the ticket to be the president of the united state of America is largely undermining her unstable internacional relationship with the middle east, Russia, and most countries that are presently having a cold war with the United States.

The policy of not wanting to engage in democratic and peaceful dialogue with the so called America enemies which has been endermic in Washington for decades is tearing the whole country down. What the US need at this time is a president that is able and willing not only to unite the country but also to create a good image with the outside World. All over the World there have been reactions from people from all Works of life expecting a “change we can believe in”. A change that will not undermine the peace we all are waitng for in the middle-east., a change that can beef-up relationship with cuba, venezuela, north korea and so many country that constitute themselves enemies not of the US but of Washington.
Americans cannot say they are not seeing and litening to the popular reaction of the internacional communitee.

Barack obama fill this gap of that president that can deliver the US at this critical situation.

tom   March 5th, 2008 8:42 am ET

Although a small percent of her votes, unanticipated anti Obama Republican voters looking to cause a little mischief may have pushed Hillary over the top in votes in Texas.

Reality Check   March 5th, 2008 8:41 am ET

Talk about drinking kool-aid. Clinton supporters believe she has experience!?!? She has the same experience as "Socks" the cat who was in the White House for the same amount of time. Oh yeah, and she has experience failing at even coming up with a viable *recommendation* for universal health care. Let's not talk about the war, savings and loans scandals, etc.

Guatemala   March 5th, 2008 8:41 am ET

YEAHHH!!!!!
congrats to hillary!
and thanks to the poeple in ohio, rhode island and texas for keeping the dream alive!!!!
next stop the white house.

Houston Texas   March 5th, 2008 8:41 am ET

Hillary needs to send a formal thank you note to Rush Limbaugh for helping her win Texas.

Lilarose in Oregon   March 5th, 2008 8:41 am ET

It is about time that seniors are being given credit!

We are strong and intelligent, we have learned most of our life's lessons by now, we are plentiful, and we are LOYAL!

Arul Vigg   March 5th, 2008 8:41 am ET

A evry interesting article !!! very well written and thoroughly intriguing...i agree with it!
Arul Vigg.

Sandra from Michigan   March 5th, 2008 8:41 am ET

It's sad that fear won over hope.

Hillary may have won last night, but she is writing the script for her defeat if she wins the nomination. Hillary can't beat John McCain with that "red phone" ad. And the republicans will be more than happy to point out the fact that it was Bill Clinton who pushed NAFTA through.

Barack Obama, we need you more than ever! Go Obama!

Julie J.   March 5th, 2008 8:40 am ET

I just wrote about how Obama's comments reflected those of the President of Iran. I am writing from San Diego, CA. Thank you for this opportunity to express my opinions about the results of the primary election.

Julie Jacobson

Dave Ayers   March 5th, 2008 8:39 am ET

Way to Go Hillary!! Thank You Texas and Ohio!!!!!!!!!!! U Guys Rock!

Hillary 08!!

Dem Reality   March 5th, 2008 8:38 am ET

Obama and McCain.....Obama has my vote.

Hillary/Bill clinton and McCain......McCain has my vote

None of them are perfect.......but the Clintons have proven themselves to be the most untrustworthy and suspect of all the candidates.

End the Bush,Clinton,Bush, Clinton (20 years)....Regime and method of politics.

A Republican ready for change, because If its gonna be "business as usual".....I'll stick with my own party.

Good luck Dems......lose it to the Republicans again and you might as well pack it in.

ELAINE   March 5th, 2008 8:38 am ET

I/VE BEEN AROUND LONG ENOUGH TO KNOW A CORRUPT POLITICIAN WHEN I SEE ONE....GUESS I WILL BE VOTING FOR MCCAIN AS I JUST CAN'T VOTE FOR SOMEONE WHO IS CORRUPT AS SLICK HILLIARY....MAYBE NOW SHE CAN OPEN HER TAX RECORDS OR IS SHE AFRAID WE WILL SEE HOW MUCH MONEY HER AND SLICK WILLY MADE FROM THEIR ARAB FRIENDS IN DUBAR????GO HILLIARY.....THIS COUNTRY IS DUMB ENOUGH TO PUT HER IN THAN WE DESERVE HER...HA HA OHIO....YOU JUST REWARDED THE PERSON WHO SENT YOUR JOBS OVERSEE'S...SHE HAS BACKED NAFTA ALL THE WAY...HOW DUMB CAN YOU BE.

Dave, PA   March 5th, 2008 8:38 am ET

Sorry CNN, looks like Hillary has prevailed once again...and Im sure you are disapointed. On to Pennsylvania it is! Looks like you have no choice but to print something nice about her for a change!

GO HILLARY!!

Elder   March 5th, 2008 8:38 am ET

She was suppose to win the whole primaries and caucuses.
Give credit to Obama, Because he has gone very far.
I will not vote for Obama, because he does not explain about the issues concerning our nation. Besides, This is no about Obama.
Its all about the nation, and the problems that the nation faces.

Lisa   March 5th, 2008 8:37 am ET

If it's Hillary against McCain I will not vote in Nov, because As a true Americans I will not support an another 4 year of fears, lying , stealing, and killing people who are not in agreement will you.

Tired   March 5th, 2008 8:37 am ET

Sillary you are a big liar. You make women look bad. Get some wisdom...........

Justin   March 5th, 2008 8:37 am ET

Let's get Obama another pillow 'cause it's going to be rough ride from here on out.

Zach   March 5th, 2008 8:37 am ET

Texas does not distribute delegates on a strict proportional basis. Why is CNN representing it as such? Clinton may have won the popular vote in the primary but it is not correct to day that she won Texas. Please provide a real breakdown of how the delagates will fall.

Bob Allen   March 5th, 2008 8:36 am ET

You have overlooked one major factor in yesterdays election, especially in Texas. For the past few days, and especially yesterday, the right wing airwaves including Rush Limbaugh and Shawn Hannaty have been urging republicans to cross over and vote for Hillary. The fact that so many white males voted for Hillary should not be surprising since so many of them, I believe, were influenced by these right wing broadcasters. The election results were rigged!

RT   March 5th, 2008 8:36 am ET

A major reason why Hillary Clinton should continue is, regardless of all his talk and caucus wins, Barak Obama is yet to win a single big state. Win a big state before you claim the right to be the nominee to win the big country! Go Hillary! Last, but definitely not the least the best political team should get a reality check!

John in Columbus, OH   March 5th, 2008 8:36 am ET

Blacks will punish race-baiting Hillary in the General if she steals the nomination. At least 25% of the Democratic Electorate will either not show up or switch to McCain. The Democrats lost in 2000 and 2004 by thin margins. It will be wider in 2008.

Also, Obama will not accept a VP position. Black Superdelegates for Clinton are now in their last term. Just my prediction.

Mark   March 5th, 2008 8:35 am ET

Looks like I'll be forced to vote for McCain – because I cannot and will not vote for Clinton, under any circumstance.

Dee   March 5th, 2008 8:34 am ET

As an Independent voter and a liberal American, I was supporting Obama so far- I was quite excited abt him..now the Democrat race is looking ugly and Hillary looks more and more dishonest and mean day by day.

Ot the other hand, McCain has changed his tone about Iraq war and he considers himself liberal and welcomes Independent voters..I am going for McCain

Don't it make my Brown Eyes blue   March 5th, 2008 8:34 am ET

Have fun being Obama's Vice President. You will not be the Nom Hill. Howard Dean will say "look you old bag, you are his VP". I can't wait till he goes negative on you.....I mean those 527s...that he has nothing to do with.

randy   March 5th, 2008 8:33 am ET

Obama did great last night and I hope and pray he got the normination.cause he have won more vote more state and delegates so mathematicaly hilary don't stand a chance.OBAMA 08!

Jay Tuck   March 5th, 2008 8:33 am ET

Aren't you guys a bit early?
Texas caucuses are only about 1/3 in.
And Obama's leading there. It can still go the other way.

I think CNN should be more carerful in its reporting.
You always pop up a picture and a check with the "winner of a state".
But this is not the general ("winner-take-all") election.
You got it wrong in Nevada.
And now you're rushing Texas before the results are in.
Please be responsible.

Jay Tuck
Hamburg, Germany

dee   March 5th, 2008 8:33 am ET

Well, Mrs.C.......your blatant plagiarism...that was Mondales ad...did you get permission?.......just added to your nasty tactics but gained you nothing.....you will still lose the nomination

Dene in Charleston, SC   March 5th, 2008 8:32 am ET

I guess we have to give her credit. Hillary won 3 out of 4 primaries (Texas' caucus still being counted). And how did she do it? With good old-fashioned negative ads and dirty tricks. Isn't it strange how that Canadian memo (disavowed by the Canadian government) came to light just 4 days before the primaries? And the picture of Obama in African garb. And Hillary's Nixonian remarks about Obama's religion. Dirty tricks and negative campaigning. Maybe that's what it will take to win in November. But then, what have you really won? I thought we were aiming for something better this time. I'm really disappointed. And McCain is looking more attractive.

But wait a minute. Isn't that exactly what the ultra right-wing, hater-mongering, "conservative" talk radio folks were trying to do by sending out their legions of republicans to vote for Hillary. An estimated 10% of the Texas voters described themselves as republicans. And what was her margin of victory there?

Moe, Larry, the cheese!   March 5th, 2008 8:32 am ET

Finally, now that the media is beginning to report the TRUTH about Obama, the American public doesn't like what it sees. Do the research yourselves, it is amazing how every trail that leads from Obama ends at something dirty, evil, and repellent. When all the details about the Rezko connection are made public, the Obamaniacs will not be able to downplay this as some kind of a Clinton dirty trick. It is an Obama dirty deal, and the public needs to know the truth.

Hmmmmm.....   March 5th, 2008 8:31 am ET

You go girl... tear up that Democratic Party in HRC fashion!!!

I support BHO!!! YES WE CAN

No offense, but wouldn’t Barak’s caricature be Curious George??? I think he looks like Curious George!!!

YES WE CAN

Deborah   March 5th, 2008 8:30 am ET

Why isn't anyone discusing the fact that many of the voters in Ohio who voted for Hillary said that race was a factor? These same Democrates will expect Blacks to support Hilliary in the Fall if she manages to win the nomination. I for one will not vote for Hillary. She will do any thing to win including spilt the party.

Obama should not consider being her running mate because when you lay down with dogs you get up with fleas.

mary Cusack   March 5th, 2008 8:30 am ET

Doing the happy dance. All you mean spirited Obamatons with your nasty insults.... You are the party dividers!!! Now time is on her side. little by little the truth about your messiah will leak out and he will be revealed for what he is. Hillary aint perfect, no politician is. But at least she never claimed to be a Goddess

Wayne, Greenville TX   March 5th, 2008 8:30 am ET

I attended the Democratic causus in my precinct last night – out of 36 attendees, there were 25 votes for Barack Obama, and 11 for Hillary Clinton.

It will be interesting to see the statewide causus results.

Hmmmmm.....   March 5th, 2008 8:29 am ET

You go girl... tear up that Democratic Party in HRC fashion!!!

I support BHO!!! YES WE CAN

No offense, but wouldn’t Barack’s caricature by Curious George??? I think he looks like Curious George!!!

YES WE CAN – go big "O"

William   March 5th, 2008 8:29 am ET

My opinion is, no matter who you back come nomination time, be it Hillary or Obama, we all need to stick together and back the democratic party. We can't have another four years of Bush policies, it has nearly ruined our country. If Obama wins, then we need to back him. If Clinton wins, we need to back her.

The republicans are split on trying to guess which candidate will lose to McCain. I say both are strong candidates and either of them will win against McCain if we stick together.

I'm hoping that in the end, both candidates will put aside their differences and run on the same ticket. The democrats will be unstopable. It will be a landslide victory, then maybe we can start working on putting this great country of ours back on it's feet.

Just my two cents.

CLINTON FOR PRESIDENT   March 5th, 2008 8:29 am ET

THANK YOU TEXAS!

THANK YOU RHODE ISLAND!

THANK YOU OHIO!

HILLARY IS THE ONLY CANDIDATE WE CAN COUNT ON!!!

^ ^ CLINTON 2008 ^ ^

Kim, PA   March 5th, 2008 8:28 am ET

Pennsylvania is ready for Hillary!
Way to go Texas, Ohio, RI! You've helped prove that Hillary is a WINNER in the states that will matter in Nov.

FLORIDA should count too!!!!

GO HILLARY!
to the HILLtop we go!

Jack   March 5th, 2008 8:27 am ET

Hillary is a two-for-one Deal! We not only get a great President. We also have behind the scenes advice and influence of the most positive U.S. President in modern history. Senator Clinton has proved her abilities these past couple of weeks – what indignant Obamans call dirty politics is, well, politics! Thats the way it is and we Democrats need someone with thick skin who knows how to win the election and win with Congress and World leaders as President.

Kyu Reisch, Radcliff, Kentucky   March 5th, 2008 8:27 am ET

Seniors are experienced, they think more than young teens, they know better than blind followers. I am a senior, I trust Hillary, she will do the job on day one. We need the President who is brilliant, experienced and powerful. She is the only one who can solve our problems in nation and with foreign countries. American voters, you are smarter than some of candidates, please trust Hillary, she will do the job way better than other candidates. She will get back America.

MARLENE MARTINO   March 5th, 2008 8:27 am ET

THAT WAS GREAT HILARY, KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK. SHOW THEM ALL HOW IT IS DONE. YOUR DOING GREAT.

Anonymous   March 5th, 2008 8:25 am ET

I wonder if any of the networds would put together a map shaded to show the winnings of Hillary and Barack according to the percentages they've won in each state? I like the fact that Democrats award the candidates the share they've won, but the networks show maps that show Republican-like "winner-take-all" graphics. I'd like to see a “Democratic” graphic that shows exactly who has won what percentage of each state!

Bob, Lyons Oregon   March 5th, 2008 8:25 am ET

Well, she only won because of her negative attacks and I for one do not want her as a president. She will do anything to win, and fear is the way she will lead. I am so disappointed in people, that they listened to her bull and her attacks. As far as I am concerned she is tearing the democratic party apart. I will continue to vote for Barack Obama, but if she becomes the nominee, I will vote for McCain. Wake up people and smell the distaste in your mouth.

Mom In PA   March 5th, 2008 8:24 am ET

Obama 2008!!

Stay the course Mr. Obama. You are a GOOD man!!! The American people are ready to see truth. If you vote for a poltical who goes negative and plays on your fears, they will keep it negative during their time in office.

I will chose HOPE! I will chose TRUTH! I will chose OBAMA!!!!!!!

Marie,   March 5th, 2008 8:23 am ET

She probably win Texas but with a very small marge. Obama still have delegates number on his side and the course is not over yet. But last night when she claimed that she win also Florida and Michigan I thing that show a lot of arrogance.... Hope Richardson and Edwards will endorse Obama soon, I don't think that will be a good idea, to extend too long this course for the democrat party. I have the feeling that Mrs Clinton will go more negative and nasty now,than ever . And I think you will see Obama campain reply on the same way...Oufffff

Vicki NH   March 5th, 2008 8:23 am ET

Senator Clinton’s campaign has not gone negative on Obama. The Senator is just pointing out inconsistencies in the Obama rhetoric. Four things have come to light what else is out there. His campaign talked to Canada about NAFTA and then he lied about it. He has not held oversight hearings with the committee he chairs on NATO. He has not answered all the questions regarding his involvement with Rezko. He claimed in the last CNN debate that he has released all the data on the earmarks he has received for his state since he has been a US Senator but he only released the data for 2007, where is the data for 2005 & 2006? IF THE PRESS IN THIS COUNTRY WERE DOING THEIR JOB THEY WOULD BE BRINGING UP THESE QUESTIONS. To the press corps WAKE UP and start doing your job !!

Bubba   March 5th, 2008 8:22 am ET

Hillary looks better in a cowboy hat than Barack. That's the secret of her popularity in Texas.

david   March 5th, 2008 8:22 am ET

YEEEEEEHAW! ...I TOLD YOU WE HAD HER BACK IN TEXAS!!!

GO HILLARY GO!

MADAME PRESIDENT.

RobJohnson   March 5th, 2008 8:22 am ET

Although I'm not a Hillary supporter, I'l give credit where credit is due. She and her people worked very hard, with their back against the wall, to make this happen. They should all be very proud today.

Even though I support Obama, it's only fair that he have to earn the nomination if he's going to go up against McCain, and Hillary obviously isn't going to let him have it without a fight.

Unlike some people, I view a long primary season as absolutely healthy, both for the Democratic Party and this country. It's great to see people so excited about politics, and now they will stay engaged for the next several months.

May the best candidate win!

Sarah   March 5th, 2008 8:21 am ET

And what about Rush Limbaugh? How has he impacted the race by encouraging Republicans to vote for Clinton in order to drag out this race and tear apart the Democratic party? Surely Clinton's "win" in Texas can be at least partly attributed to him.

Johnny C.   March 5th, 2008 8:21 am ET

It's interesting to see how many racist are in the Democrat Party.

They are imploding.

Worst.Party.Ever

LaShawn , Pensacola FL   March 5th, 2008 8:20 am ET

How many Republicans voted for Clinton? Remember Rush Limbaugh. He told republicans to vote for her thinking she is the weaker candidate.

Mad in Texas   March 5th, 2008 8:19 am ET

What's wrong with how you won. You can make excuses all you want too. The same can be said about Obama. He won because most all the black voted for him. As one would expect. However, they're voting without taking in the bad qualities of the man. REZKO and his degrading attack along with media on Clinton. People seem to forget how he started along with Edwards in the second debate an hateful attack on Hillary. So I am tired of all the excuses that she is using attack ads. So is he. Full of untruths. Why can't you just admit it. SHE SMOKED HIM AND HE MIGHT AS WELL GET USED TO IT FROM NOW ON TO THE END> HILLARY CLINTON 08

George   March 5th, 2008 8:19 am ET

Thank you Ohio
Thank you Texas
Thank you Rhode Island

Hillary has been exposed to the Republican Machine for 12 years. Barack is just now having to deal with it. In the next few weeks it will be obvious to all Democrats who can win the general election. I'm sorry, but Barack cannot.

Hillary 08

Toochi   March 5th, 2008 8:18 am ET

I firmly believe that the voters who were undecided before March 4th were swayed by the allegations that the Clinton campaign made about the Canadian NAFTA memo and about his lack of action on the EU subcommitte. Why Obama's camp didn't answer to those allegations swiftly?... I don't know. What I do know is that they need to start disputing those allegations STRONGLY and start htting the Clinton camp back or Obama will get more of what happened in Texas last night.

Obama 08   March 5th, 2008 8:18 am ET

This is for all of the future Latinos candidates. When the time come and you put fourth a viable candidate for any elective office. African American will not forget...Boy, have y'all been duped by the Clinton...

TRUTHSEEKER   March 5th, 2008 8:17 am ET

Clinton's win can ...and is attributed to the slander and fear based campaign she waging. Her win in Ohio is based on semi ignorant people that would vote for the devil himself if he had a white skin. These are the same voters that Carl Rove tapped into when George Bush ran for office. He used a campaign based on fear and division....and for all of Hillary's phoney denouncing of his tactics she is no better. In fact.. she is worse because she is giving the Republicans ammunition and paving the way to the Democratic party's next presidential loss.

A.J.   March 5th, 2008 8:17 am ET

pp

Bill   March 5th, 2008 8:16 am ET

She may win Texas, she may win Ohio, she may win Pa but this Independent voter will not be helping her.

If she wins in August my Independent vote will not go for her husband to return to the white house and govern the United States again.

This is why I am an Independent. I vote for the person and not a party. John if Hillary is it you can plan on my vote

Caron Speas   March 5th, 2008 8:16 am ET

I am encouraged by last nights results. The late deciders tell us something. That people are finally realizing that, although Mr. Obama casts his nose up into the air and spouts fine words as a polished politician, he lacks heart, and a soulful connection with average Americans. He campaigns like any college professor would, but does not know suffering. I can't "feel" him.

Rick   March 5th, 2008 8:16 am ET

I HATE TO BE THE ONE TO TELL ALL OF THE OBAMA SUPPORTERS OUT THERE, BUT " I T O L D Y O U SO" NEVER EVER COUNT A CLINTON OUT, SHE IS A WELL OILED MACHINE AND WILL KEEP RIGHT ON RUNNING UNTIL THERE IS NO MORE RUNNING TO DO, SHE WILL NEVER COWER DOWN, SHE WILL NEVER QUIT. SHE IS IN THIS THING FOR ALL OF THE RIGHT REASONS AND AMERICA HAS FINALLY SEEN A PART OF OBAMA THAT I KNEW WAS THERE BUT COULDN'T SEEM TO HEAR CNN, MSNBC OR FOX SAY THAT HE HAS FLAWS JUST LIKE ALL THE REST OF THEM. IT SURE TOOK LONG ENOUGH FOR THE MEDIA TO CATCH ON, AND LOOK HOW FAST HILLARY RESPONDED TO THE CALL WHEN IT HAD BEEN KNOWN THAT OBAMA WAS SECRETLY TALKING TO CANADA ABOUT TRADE AGREEMENTS. HE WAS BUSTED IN A LIE AND WE CAN'T HAVE THAT OUT OF SUCH AN UPSTANDING PERFECT (SO SAYS HIS CAMPAIGN) PRESIDENTIAL NOMINEE NOW CAN WE?

YOU GO HILLARY, SHOW THEM WHAT A REAL DEMOCRATE IS MADE OF, FIGHT ON ON FRIEND, FIGHT ON.

Trev   March 5th, 2008 8:15 am ET

I think this is a good indication of electability. Clinton can win Ohio in the general. Obama cannot. When you ad in the fact that NJ and MI are in play for McCain if Obama wins, Clinton has the better argument. Clinton is also better on the issues, as demonstrated by most exit polling last night.

Hillary supporters. Let's not gloat about this. We need to move forward to the next set of contests. That which does not kill us makes us stronger.

Hillary 08

Ann Aloha FariMedia, PA   March 5th, 2008 8:14 am ET

Well, Well, Well, I guess 50 Million raised in February, Union Endorsements and Spending 4x the amount than Senator Clinton...And Senator O bama still couldn't deliver.
The PEOPLE have spoken.
I am anticipating the hostile Obamanites getting on here and try(as usual) to spew hatred and insults at Senator Clinton and her supporters.
Even republican and independent imposters are sure to get on the band wagon to downplay this slaughter by Senator Clinton.
America Spoke and now it's time to listen...Senator Clinton should be recognized for kicking some royal buttocks.
Have a Great Day

michelle   March 5th, 2008 8:13 am ET

her whole demeanor is a turn off!!
she could care less about her party , Hillary is all about Hillary not the american people
almost 30 years of Bushes and Clintons ...you call that democracy!!
I think not , thats Monarchy!
Even if she did win she will NEVER win against McBush
so americans can welcome themselves to 4 more years of war
and maybe even war with Iran with an already burnt out military
dont be surprised if MCBush brings in a draft for that reason alone, having the military mind he does.
you asked for it you GOT it!!!
the democratic party has a train wreck on their hands!!!!

Anyone but Hillary!   March 5th, 2008 8:13 am ET

Are the Cllintons planning to file their tax return this April? And what happened to their return from last year's filing. Hillary knows nothing about taxes as she agrees with the current AMT tax rules where you can not claim your children or elderly parents as dependants? The tax code does not support families- it penalizes hard working americans that have achieved a nice salary and it does not take into consideration the amount of children or elderly parents that need to be supported. Shame on our government for subjecting everyone to AMT. It was supposed to be used for people with several types of unusual investments. Now everyone in America can be subject to AMT without having unusual investments. Its a scam.

Latina for Obama   March 5th, 2008 8:12 am ET

what about the republicans that voted for her? that is why she got it there, because of Rush's help, but you k now the reason for that.Besides the margin she has on Senator Obama is marginal, so how is this a win?
when is cnn going to report on her tax returns?\
when is cnn going to report on the court matter of Clinton vs. Paul?
what about the white house papers she is delaying?
\what about her and Bill's link to Rezko?
what about her dirty tactics on the latest issue with Canada ?
\what about her dirty tactics of fear and the pictures and what she is doing to those pictures of Senator Obama?

she voted for Iraq................ can CNN report on that?

jj   March 5th, 2008 8:11 am ET

OK Obama, isn't it time for YOU to step aside, people are finally seeing that you are all talk or stealing ideas from Clinton. It's amazing that in the beginning, you had no answers, and funny how now, you mirror a lot of Clinton's. She's the leader, YOU'RE the follower. You talk up a good storm but don't deliver. You need experience, that's all there is to it. Too many people see you as the divider of the party, a large number of people who voted for Clinton will switch to McCain if you get the nom. Can't you see that, you're the spoiler, not Clinton. Why don't you realize it and give your ego a rest.

Stu   March 5th, 2008 8:10 am ET

Why do you pretend to know something about politics? Let's see you said McCain was done for several month ago and what happened? Let's see you said Clinton was done for at least a month ago and what happened? Gee, you guys sure know your business. Like weathermen, when you are wrong, which is more often than not, you never admit it.

Keep up the wonderful work. Don't let the facts get in the way.

attilio presciutti   March 5th, 2008 8:09 am ET

How about that? Hillary did it again. I see from some of the comments by the great team at CNN that either the team is blind , deaf , and dumb or they just don't like the idea of electing a leader that has support of one of the greatest minds our coutry has ever had. Yes !!! Bill Clinton. In previous comment I sent to CNN i stated they would be eating CROW after the march 4th primaries . Start eating great minds at CNN. And it aint over yet. If you're looking to be on the winning side!!! maybe it's time to start your push for Hillary abd get off Obama's band wagon that's about to lose it's weels. Eddie – from Rochester, N.Y.

Skye   March 5th, 2008 8:08 am ET

OK so Hillary won 3 states but it proves nothing to me. Her margins were not that impressive and her celebration was presumptuous. Confetti how contrived…they tried to make her look like the winner of the presidential general election. Her moaning, crying, and misleading attacks paid off. She had the press wrapped around her finger. The screaming and moaning bit got the press and other succers to pay attention. The problem with this scenario is most people usually divorce the screaming drama queen in favor of a more intelligent, stable, peaceful, and forward thinking life style.
All we heard from the press for the last two weeks was…”what can Hillary do to win this thing?” Poor Hillary she’s a woman and they are treated differently. Another wish fulfilled for her (Cheep advertising.) Well I hope now it is Barack’s turn. (African American Man Leads in Delegates, States won, and the Popular vote… how impressive at this point. Who would have thunk.) I hope you the press spend the next 2 weeks discussing how Barack can win. I hope he brings out all the ammunition and relentlessly fires back.
Through all this pundentry nothing was said about how Obama is being out campaigned by Hillary, Bill, and Chelsea. Three against one! There was more said about his out spending her. It was nothing more than a whisper that the Republicans were told to vote for Hillary to prolong the race and create a more divisive Democratic party. This reality is the Republicans dream come true a split in the Democratic Party with infighting and Hillary manipulating her way to the nomination. How stupid is this country? Are we again going to play into Republican hands? You ain’t seen anything until you see a campaign waged against Hillary by the Republican Party. They are the masters of the dirty fight.
The press does help fulfill dreams. Unfortunately there are people in this country who are so easily swayed who buy into the hype, lies, deceit, and promises made to them.
If Hillary manipulates her way to the nomination I will be voting for McCain. I am going to my City Hall today to change my party affiliation to Independent. That is just a start.
And just a note to Howard Dean whom I campaigned for in his run for the presidency if you seat the delegates in Florida and Michigan you will really prove yourself a looser. You made the rules you should stick by them. “Those delegates should not count!” And no redo’s…. you made the bed now we all have to sleep in it.

Fern
Waltham, MA

Mark   March 5th, 2008 8:06 am ET

The Obama hot air balloon has been deflated by the next President
of the United States of America "Hillary Clinton". She is the only one that can beat McCain with her experience. You go girl

Di   March 5th, 2008 8:04 am ET

OHIO >>RHODE ISLAND>>TEXAS

SLAM DUNK!!!

"As goes Ohio...So goes the Nation"

GO HILLARY!!!
THE COME BACK QUEEN!!!
~
(Hmm...maybe Bwark Obama will be too busy in Chicago next week)

David   March 5th, 2008 8:04 am ET

People are having buyer's remorse with Obama and it shows.

Anne   March 5th, 2008 8:04 am ET

Congratulations to Hillary! She won on her message and her solutions. It is about time the media started examining Obama more closely. Why does he refuse to talk about Rezko? America deserves the truth. Also, why is it dirty and fear tactics when Clinton runs ads and pure genius when Obama runs the same. Time to get real, open your eyes America, Obama does not have the experience to turn around our economy. You may not like her, you don't have to like her, but she is the best qualified and can right the ship.

David   March 5th, 2008 8:02 am ET

Did you notice how Hillary was beating about the bush when asked what is the experience she has be toutingthat qualifies her for the office. Please, would someone be bold enough to make her give a straight answer and also to tell her to quit lying about negotiating opening an border, also when is she going to release her white house record at least we would be able to back up all she has been saying.

Dalmo   March 5th, 2008 8:02 am ET

Congratulations Obama!

It's hard someone want changes happen so fast when still exist old politic methods that fascinate majority of people.
Unhappy lies still fascinate and convince many people at any place of the world. They seem more attractives to the eyes of poors, ignorants, less educated, conservative minds etc.
Congratulations Mr. Obama! You are beeing a example of new generation of politics at USA, showing honesty and dignity making politic. You are a big winner fighting against old politics and conservative minds of the own democrates.
Obama, you keep firmly making your honest politic and with quality at USA, without to use lies to win primaries. We are with you at Brazil and in the world.

Go Obama!
Hugs from Brazil to USA.

Independent for Obama   March 5th, 2008 8:02 am ET

THANK YOU HILLARY.... WE ARE SO PROUD OF YOU...

YOU DID SUCH A GOOD JOB SPLASHING COLD WATER ON HOPE AND TEARING DOWN A POSITIVE CAMPAIGN... WAY TO GO...

YOU DID A GREAT JOB RUNNING FEAR MONGERING ADS... FANTASTIC...

YOU DID SUCH A WONDERFUL JOB TAKING SO MUCH MONEY FROM SO MANY HUGE CORPORATIONS...

THANK YOU FOR DIVIDING THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY EVEN FURTHER AND MAKING IT POSSIBLE FOR THE REPUBLICANS TO WIN.

THANK YOU FOR HIDING YOUR INCOME TAXES FROM US!!!

SINCERELY,

YOUR IGNORANT, BLIND FOLLOWERS WHO ONLY WANT YOU TO WIN, AND WHO REFUSE TO ASK YOU ANY SERIOUS, HARD QUESTIONS

Maggie, Texas   March 5th, 2008 8:01 am ET

She sure did! Way to go Hillary. It's not over yet!

Deborah in FL   March 5th, 2008 8:01 am ET

Like it or not this is most likely going to mean a new vote in FL...please everyone, make a statement that Florida COUNTS. Go back to the polls or caucuses or whatever the party decides we need to do and let your vote be heard. I don't think there is any way that the party will be able to adopt the previous election results even though they were fair in that the only candidate to run a campaign ad here was Barack Obama (by mistake he says) and Sen Clinton still won the state and everyone was still on the ballot. The only way the moved up primary date (that our illustrious lawmakers touted as making Florida's voice heard) makes sense for us in Florida is if we all go back and vote the same way we did in the first place. The handwriting on the wall is that we will have to go back to the polls, so be prepared.

Sarah   March 5th, 2008 8:00 am ET

She is the BEST WOMAN FOR THE JOB !!!!!!!

GO HILLARY !!!!

Roy   March 5th, 2008 7:59 am ET

Finally, we are waking up and we are able to differentiate between talk and walk. I am proud of the democrats in Texas,Ohio and Rhode Island. They are awesome!! They have proven that we the people can be above media manipulation.

Go Hillary Go!!! You would be the best President we ever had!!!

Barbara   March 5th, 2008 7:59 am ET

Oh the media was so slow to give Hillary credit. I believe the gender factor is very much at work against Hillary. People are supporting and voting along racial lines, not character and hard work, as we should
like to believe. A male candidate would not have had to encounter this kind of bashing. We have not come anywhere in this country.

Richard   March 5th, 2008 7:59 am ET

Obama – So your magic wand was bent! Words are not everything, but solutions are. Hillary has solutions!

Hillary we love you! Hillary 2008!

Byron Pope   March 5th, 2008 7:58 am ET

When is someone going to wake up and realize that slick lawyers like the Clinton's have out smarted the founding father's about no one can run for President after leaving office. The Constitution should read that an ex-presidents wife cannot run for President after her husband time is up. I submit a proposal to admend the Constitution so this will never happen again in order to give new talent and new ideas a chance. Does anyone think that bill clinton will keep his mouth shut if his wife wins?

j. h.   March 5th, 2008 7:57 am ET

Well Hillary you only seem to win if you spread rumors about Barack Obama in your smear campaigns. He only attacks you in defense. Barack Obama trys to keep the focus on the voters needs and not try to smear your reputation or put doubts of half truths and lies out about you. The world is watching the U. S. election very close and with your actions they will say it's the same old politics as usual. You seem to forget how many skeletons that Barack Obama can attack you with and not have to fabricate some trumped up half truths!!!!

Myrna   March 5th, 2008 7:56 am ET

The Important thing is that OBAMA HAS MORE DELEGATES, AND HE WILL WIN THE NOMINATION.. HE HAS MORE SUPPER DELGATES! AS FOR THE OLD FOLKS , AND THE LATINOS, WHO REALLY CARES?? THE YOUNGER LATINOS VOTED FOR OBAMA, WE NEED CHANGE IN THIS COUNTRY ,WE DO NOT NEED ANY MORE OLD FOLKS RUNNING THIS COUNTRY.. I AM 57 AND HAVE LOST MY JOB, AND CURRENTLY LOOKING FOR WORK, DO YOU SEE ME WHINING?? I FIGURE I WILL WORK UNTIL I AM 100 IF I HAVE TO, I HAVE 6 GRANDS TO CONSIDER ABOUT, AND WE NEED SOMEONE LIKE OBAMA TO INSPIRE AND GET THE COUNTRY RIGHT BACK ON TRACK.. OBAMA 08

Philly for Obama   March 5th, 2008 7:56 am ET

People in Ohio and Texas fell victim to a false sense of fear.

Pennsylvania has a great sense of hope! We know the real truth.

Obama 08'

James   March 5th, 2008 7:56 am ET

I am very disappointed in CNN. The evidence that they have favored Clinton for the past few days has shown.The is a shame.

Sarah Smith   March 5th, 2008 7:55 am ET

Yipee! SIX COUNT EM! SIX MORE MONTHS of

DEMS DIVIDED!! Until the convention end August..

This will be BETTER FODDER for HEADLINES

than how GRIM the future is for the common american.

negative GNP, job reductions, cutbacks,

rampant inflation! oil at $120!

$ worth 1/2 Euro!

Who wants to read about ALL THAT???!!!

Thanks Bill C for starting it ALL with the

IRRATIONAL EXHUBERANCE during YOUR TERMs!

The DOT.COM bubble, the TELECOM meltdown,

Enron skyrocketed (thrived/flourished) during YOUR TERMS!

and it is NOW the tip of the ICEBERG of financial mismanagements

pd4hillary   March 5th, 2008 7:55 am ET

Hillary brings the double-whammy. Take care of national security and the economy. Obama sucks wind!!

Robin   March 5th, 2008 7:55 am ET

Everybody says that we don't like negative campaign, but the people who decided in the last 3 days, they voted for it. I think the big problem for Democrats will show up in November, since Clinton team's approach to the primary elections is weakening the party. Lots of negatives generated by her and her team that will be used against the Democrat nominee by Republicans. Maybe she thinks, if she is not going to be the Democrat nominee in 2008, it is better to have a Republican in White House this November, so she can run for 2012. That is sad.

caroline   March 5th, 2008 7:54 am ET

She is talking about solution. Maybe I misunderstood, but I don't see any solution in this campaign: 60 days all solgers back from Iraq?? The universal health care? I need solution from this woman who is just full of herself .

James R, Texas   March 5th, 2008 7:54 am ET

We voted for Clinton for a very simple reason, she is the real candidate for real CHANGE. Obama might have fooled voters from the previous State primaries and caucauses but not my State of Texas, Ohio and Rhode Island. Obama can't fool american voters any longer. His speeches will not put food on our tables, will not pay our bills and will not fix the econmy and health care and americans now understand that clearly. Vote for Hillary all the way to the White House!!!

Sandi from Grand Rapids, Michigan   March 5th, 2008 7:54 am ET

March 5th, 2008 7:23 am ET
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
Barack Obama will still win.

He just overestimated Ohio and Texas voters. He didn't point out the irony of Hillary's stand on NAFTA. He failed to clearly and repeatedly make the point that it was Bill Clinton who got us into NAFTA.

He also didn't point out that first lady experience doesn't necessarily qualify as national security experience to answer a "3am phone call".

He's smart. He won't make those mistakes again. Hillary however will try to stay with this NAFTA thing, and her "red phone' ads, and she will be called out on it.

pd4hillary   March 5th, 2008 7:54 am ET

Alright Hillary supporters, it's time to donate, donate, donate. He is outspending her 4 to 1, but she is hanging in there, We've got to help her keep going. Go Hillary!!!

Maggie   March 5th, 2008 7:53 am ET

Even with Clinton winning the big states last night we are still getting the negative media remarks. Why should Clinton give up now because she is behind in the delegate count. If Michigan and Florida delegates were included she would be ahead. If Obama had won those states we would be hearing the media wanting these delegates to be added in for him. The people are showing us that they want Hillary and her ability to win all these big states should tell you that she can win over McCain in November. Obama is incapable of carrying those essential swing states like Clinton can. What democrats should now do is to make sure that Clinton wins all of the upcoming primaries and caucases so that she can win the nomination. She will then go on and win over McCain because she is the only one that can do so.

Even with the interviews this morning on CNN they were giving Clinton the hard questions and as usual being soft with Obama. Obama is not strong enough for the presidential office. We need a fighter and he does not have that backbone. Clinton is the fighter and she will prevail.

Don't lose your vote by voting for Obama because voting for him is like voting for McCain in November. Be smart with your "X".

I am proud of you Clinton for doing so well last night and I know you can win that final race in November and become the first woman president. Good luck with your campaign and I am behind you 100%.

Melissa   March 5th, 2008 7:53 am ET

The thing I find so depressing is that Hillary's going negative worked so well. All of her experience did not work for her –until she took it to a manipulative, negative image of children sleeping in their beds being put at risk. I am old enough to remember that first manipulative ad, of the nuclear bomb going off. And, yes, it scared the hell out of me. But I was a kid - it is a shame that adults fell for this sort of negative manipulation.

It's true that you get what you ask for... are we absolutely certain that we want a President that resorts to any tactic to win? Is that really what is great about America? Or is America a place that calls people to be their best selves, treating one another with respect, even when we are on opposite teams?

I hope that Obama stays his course and does not fall into the trap of negativity as well, and shows that real strength comes from answering that sort of attack with renewed respect and determination.

Rick   March 5th, 2008 7:53 am ET

I may be only 1 vote, but if Hillary wins the Democratic nomination, I will not vote for her and I will vote for McCain the better evil of the two.

KMAN   March 5th, 2008 7:53 am ET

It's kind of depressing to think that so many of Hillary's supporters won't live long enough to see her complete a 4 year term, yet they want a say in the future that belongs to the young.

Liz   March 5th, 2008 7:52 am ET

This makes sense. Seniors have the wisdom of their years and want ecomonic health and national security for their descendents. I think they see what's real within Senator Clinton.

Contrary to Obama's claims, Karl Rove said Hillary is the one who has reached across party lines over the past six years, while Senator Obama stays perched on the left edge.

It's nice to see the right-wing media provide honest and fair discourse regarding Senator Clinton. I get the sense she has a lot of respect from Republican politicians who dislike her husband.

JB   March 5th, 2008 7:52 am ET

Hilary won on negative ads. As a lifelong democrat I will never vote for her. She will say and do anything to win. The public has again been duped. The public gave us Bush and now they are on the verge of giving us Clinton. All her "experience" is a joke. The ads are silly. But she will go to no lengths to destroy the spirit of Obama. She has won the battle, but will lose the war,

Kimberly in Texas   March 5th, 2008 7:52 am ET

Texas isn't won yet...there is still the caucus to add in and then a true winner can be announced.

Also, why isn't anyone talking about Hillary's taxes and her own court scandal going on regarding campaign fraud...the media is so easily manipulated.

Get a clue and be fair to both candidates....

Ray - NJ   March 5th, 2008 7:52 am ET

Its all Hillary now!! Here we go!!!! Hillary Clinton, President of the United States!

Evian Bidet   March 5th, 2008 7:51 am ET

The last three day deciders were Rush Limbaugh followers acting on his advice. That is when he proposed his listeners vote for Hillary. I can't believe CNN has not been reporting this. It is why Obama lost Texas, in my opinion.

LIZ   March 5th, 2008 7:51 am ET

Last night is a night that all media and americans knew would happen. She is a pro at this and knows what to do to get her words across!!!!
She is a fighter and can stand anything that is put against her!!

I am so proud!!!

Obama is not a bad candidate either......I like him. but I think Hillary has want it takes.....also.....there is too much racism going on since these primaries. Isn't it funny how all voters for Obama are in the high black communities?!?! I am affraid of the outcome when one of them wins and the other doesn't........

But nevertheless....Hillary is back and running her campaign hard!!!

A TRUE FUGHTER!

Rob   March 5th, 2008 7:50 am ET

Republicans wake up and rejoice your nominee has finally won! No, I’m not talking about John McCain I am referring to Hillary Clinton. She has finally broken the 12-0 streak of Barrack Obama. Just how did she do it when all the polls had her chasing or with a small lead in OH and RI, well its simple Republicans knew they had their candidate selected so there was no need to vote on their own ticket in light of that a percentage of them voted for the obvious person to beat in Hillary. We now live in an age where American Idol has support from web sites to vote for the worst act in an attempt to keep the less talented or even horrible singers on as long as they can to make us all suffer for a couple of laughs. Thanks Hillary for being our Sanjia now we get to watch months of the Democratic Party ripping each other apart while McCain can focus on a true run for the White House.

changing times   March 5th, 2008 7:50 am ET

congratulations madame president!!

You've proven Democrats will respond positively to fear and smear tactics and fall back on their prejudices instead of what inspires them. I guess we can look forward to more negativity as this race moves forward since it worked so well for you this past week.

Funny how she couldn't point to anything that qualifies her to answer the"red" phone. She just kept talking about Obama on CNN this morning. Interesting.

cindy   March 5th, 2008 7:49 am ET

Well hooray for Hilary, but my first choice was Edwards, my second was Obama, and my third is McCain. So guess i'll just be voting republican if Obama isn't the nominee. Wonder how many other people will switch parties come November. If i can't have change, I'll go with the most experienced(McCain). Hilary talks about making healthcare mandatory and has made the comment of where would we be if social security weren't mandatory. Well excuse me but over the last few years all i have heard is how we need to fix social security and how it's going broke. So are we supposed to put a bunch of our hard earned money into yet another account that the government can borrow from any time it wants and have that go broke too. Then who will pay the healthcare cost.

noemi   March 5th, 2008 7:49 am ET

I agree its difficult for Hillary to catch up with pledeged delegates as long as Florida & Michigan are not counted. But be what it is we will now see how Presidential Barak is a/k/a how tough he is in time of crisis.

Mark   March 5th, 2008 7:49 am ET

Time for Hillary to release the tax returns and Bill's White House papers.... lest we forget a lack of transparency so evident in the past few weeks.

Louis Sifa   March 5th, 2008 7:49 am ET

I think that on the contrary the Media is unequally biased towards Hilary, maybe not particularly flattering to her personality because that would be a herculean task for anybody but as regards to her political stance after Obama won over 60% in 15 states! Hilary won over 60% in only Arkansas, she didn't win that much even in New York. The only reason why Hilary is still in this thing is because the Media goes along with her own desperate campaign pitch! That only some states matter and even those she barely scrapes by! The American people have spoken! Because Hilary is a woman is no reason for us to pander to her life time personal ambition at the expense of democracy. The American people are not a game to be played!

Dena   March 5th, 2008 7:48 am ET

Obama is a brave leader far more than Hillary can ever be. When Hillary lost big she hid from the media and was no where to be seen ; however, although Obama lost last night, he was out there giving America information and support to see us though this fight. He is a man that has achieved the impossible. Hillary is a spoiled and arrogant senator from New York, The Latino voters for Hillary are hurting America by allowing Hillary and her corrupt lethal operatives from New York and Washington to gain a stronger grip on America. OBAMA is fair minded, extremely intelligent, humble, and brave leader. Please help get the arrogance out of washington – let's get America back on track- VOTE OBAMA

Independent in IA   March 5th, 2008 7:48 am ET

That Clinton got the 'older' vote is not at all surprising...these are the folks who know history, and that it takes a knowledgeable, strong head and heart individual to guide this country through its problems.

While Obama promises to 'fix' Washington, the older generation remembers the "Chicago Politics" of the last century and realize that absolutely nothing has or will change with that style of thinking or acting....witness the hand-washing of Resko et al. Also witness the "Present" votes that made sure not to offend anyone who counted.

Flowery speeches are not going to sway the older crowd. Hope is not going to flow down the walls and turn into milk and honey, and Kumbaya is not going to be sung soulfully around the dinner table while the kids joyfully recount their exciting day at school.

Like Lou Dobbs, I don't have a dog-in-this-hunt...I'm a Populist....the People come first....and so far I'm not being shown much. I'm a Realist, and neither candidate in the Democratic Primary field has substantively answered questions to my satisfaction....but I'm certainly not going to depend on 'Hope' to get the job accomplished.

teresa hammond   March 5th, 2008 7:48 am ET

now is the time for the american people which are also called voters demand hillary clinton to make public her income tax . This is something that should be pressed!!!!!!! We would like to know where she got the 5 million to loan to her campaign. I would like to know how much stocks they(hilliary and bill) have in foreign markets and gas and oil markets..... the american people should know that a holder of congress does not make that kind of money, and i believe a x president only makes 400 thousand a year.......where did the 5 million loan come from... hilliary if you don't have anything to hide show us NOW!!!!! DO-NOT wait until we have no other choice

Understanding Texas vote   March 5th, 2008 7:48 am ET

What happened in Texas? Republicans were told to vote for Hillary. The Republican race had been settled. According to the radio talk show hosts, REPUBLICANS PREFER HILLARY. Those who called in say she is easier to beat in November.

Jason G., Pennsylvania   March 5th, 2008 7:47 am ET

A Win, is a a Win, is a Win! Seniors are American Voters too. Ask John McCain! Maybe if Barrack didn't just rely on the African American Voters, since that is what this race is really summing up to, maybe he wouldn't have lost such a coveted state.

Hillary, I believe, is going to sweep in PA this April. Her base is strong here. I can't wait to see the anaylsis of PA come our primary elections.

Kandy Eldred   March 5th, 2008 7:47 am ET

Obama was saying (after the Texas primary)... "Where else but America can a sheepherder from Africa come over ... marry a white woman & have their son run for president?" I believe that anybody who runs for president should have their ancestrial line mostly from America... how do we know that a candidate who has an immediate family member not being American doesn't really have some secret underlying loyalties to somewhere else?

Brenda Cheek   March 5th, 2008 7:47 am ET

Shame on the media! Just because Clinton whines and cries about unfair media coverage you guys change your tune and start changing the way you portray Hillary. We all know and people should not forget what the real Hillary is like! What happened to staying neutral? She played you like a violin!!! Give her credit, it worked. Now from here on out, how about staying neutral?

Dee   March 5th, 2008 7:46 am ET

Yup..he should prepare for the next ones...anyway he was winning a lot and getting over confident...

Robert   March 5th, 2008 7:46 am ET

John King with his fancy map also indicated Clinton won on the white votes, not just latino votes. The late decider vote for Clinton goes to show that, finally, people are waking up from the trance that Obama's empty eloquent speeches have put them in. The fact is you can't change hard-core Obama supporter's mind – they're too deep in trance. They're calling for Clinton to drop out, but too stupid to do the math. If you look at the TRUE popular votes – in primary states – Hillary is way ahead. Caucus have 'fake' counts – 'fake' just like Obama.

Jags, TX   March 5th, 2008 7:44 am ET

And the fight continues in the democrats. Pull up a chair and a nice bucket of popcorn america.. the fun is just beginning!!

Josephine   March 5th, 2008 7:43 am ET

Results are questionable. What was the turn out of Republicans voting for Clinton due to the conservative radio talk show hosts advising Republicans to vote for her? To my knowledge this has not been discussed in the exit polls. The results would be interesting to know.

nabee   March 5th, 2008 7:43 am ET

Sen. Clinton stated no Democrat Presidential Canditate who has lost Ohio has never won the General Election. The country is looking for leadership that will not only transform America for the better, but I believe the american people really want to lead the World with a Real Democracy, where your voice to the leadership is thru the vote. Did the misinformation concerning Barack Obama's "real" position on NAFTA affect him in negative way in Ohio? These political tricks are what disgust other Nations and the World. The Youth who have provided the energy for change will have to continue to debate the facts not innuendo so We can Truly move this Great Country Forward.

Katy Hill Prescott Az.   March 5th, 2008 7:42 am ET

Too bad folks don't realize that Clinton will give away another large portion of their paycheck to support welfare programs for the unwed mothers, the illegal immigrants, the drug addicted, and the unemployable while she garnishes the same check to pay for her health care coverage of folks who have to many kids to support because they don't know how to use birth control. No wonder the Hispanics, uneducated and poorer faction vote for her.

SUE, Michigan   March 5th, 2008 7:42 am ET

Ha! She's back, and Obama had better watch out, because now the real questions begin for him. I don't want to hear any crap about delegate counts and "she can't win." Yes she can, and yes, she did. The DNC better figure out a way to include Michigan and Florida in this process, and fast. We count too, and we want Hillary!!! GO Girl!

bimmer   March 5th, 2008 7:40 am ET

It was intersesting that Obama spent a good part of concession speech last night talking about emptiness. He also alluded to race and religion. Not a single word about change.

Angelika   March 5th, 2008 7:39 am ET

Hillary's only winning because a lot of feminists are being total idiots, desperately wanting a woman in the White House. Then there's the older people–like my grandpa–who want a familiar face, and of course those swayed by her nasty tactics of the falsified NAFTA report (WATCH THE VIDEO, HILLARY FANS, AND SEE HOW 'TRUE' YOUR BELOVED CANDDATE IT), and her mention of Obama's relationship with Rezco.

NEED I REMIND EVERYONE OF THE NUMEROUS CLINTON SCANDALS SHE'S TIED WITH: TRAVELGATE, WHITE WATER, THAT ONE GUY WHO KILLED HIMSELF IN CENTRAL PARTK...

Hillary does NOT have 35 years of experience, idiots. Most of those "35 years" comes from her being the WIFE of a GOVERNOR or PRESIDENT. Yeah, she's a bit involved–but IN THE BACKGROUND.

And look at what happened. She pushed the SAME EXACT Health Care plan then, and it FAILED. She's not being realistic with it. Obama's at least covering children; Hillary wants to force everyone to get it, and you can't simply do that.

4Real   March 5th, 2008 7:39 am ET

Will you find some more dirty tactics to use against Obama again?

Case   March 5th, 2008 7:39 am ET

I can not see a Democrat winning the White House. The Democrats will fight the whole way and McCain will run away with this election.

I hope McCain will keep some of that Maverick he is known for and not bow down to the GOP at every corner.

The GOP is full of crooks and liars.

Small government= biggest government ever
Low taxes= only for the extremely rich
Fiscal responsibility= greater debt than all other administrations combined

Ohio needs to leave, their voting record stinks.

Also we need to change the general election to proportional votes not winner take all; the Electoral College is outdated and leaves me with a feeling of disenfranchisement.

Realistic Independent for Obama

brian   March 5th, 2008 7:38 am ET

A question for those in Ohio and Texas. How does it feel to have voted for the woman who is married to the man who tooks your jobs away with NAFTA? Voting for the same tired Rovian style of politics. You must be proud.

If Hillary faces McCain, the dems are toast and millions of first time voters will be lost. Whendems can't see the forest for the trees no wonder they keep losing elections.

This country needs to turn the page and only one man can do it, Obama.

Ann   March 5th, 2008 7:37 am ET

Don't forget her decision to stir up lies and half-truths, insinuate on national television that Obama is a Muslim and practice general nastiness! The politics of of fear always goes over well with the elderly.

Clinton may have won in Ohio and Texas, but I fear she just gave the presidency to John McCain. I won't vote for McCain, but I won't vote for her either.

AJ   March 5th, 2008 7:37 am ET

Perhaps the late deciders actually thoght about Obama's Canadian fiasco and realized the "the hope of the world" is nothing more than a liar and a denier. Deny, Deny, Deny all you want Obama, but if you should win the nomination, the Republicans will bring all of your dirty dealings to light and hopefully we will never see or hear from you again. I have always been a democrat but if Obama wins the nomination, I will be voting for McCain and urge all Hillary supporters to do the same. Obama will be ANOTHER national disgrace.

maria   March 5th, 2008 7:35 am ET

She can thank to the medias big time... cnn and all... because they did fall for her 'crying'.... shame on you media...

Thy   March 5th, 2008 7:32 am ET

Good for her. This gets her back in the race, but as long as Obama retains that delegate lead (which shouldnt be too difficult) he will have the nomination. I'd hate to see something brokered by the superdelegates.

Obamacan   March 5th, 2008 7:30 am ET

Clinton will prolong this agaony on herself as well as those around her

Bill   March 5th, 2008 7:30 am ET

OK Hillary, now lets get to Pa. Pa. loves you.

Hillary all the way...............................08...................................................

Offbeatrock   March 5th, 2008 7:29 am ET

Obama will prevail

BGIV   March 5th, 2008 7:29 am ET

How about the 18-25 crowd? Did they just sit around and have primary watching parties and forget to go vote?

Raman   March 5th, 2008 7:29 am ET

Sen. Clinton's win in Texas and Ohio gives her the much needed monentum.

Her win is still not certain, unless she capitalize this monentum to win the next week's primaries or atleast narrow the margins by which Obama has been winning his primariy states.

Sen. Clinton's win does make Bill Schneider and Cafferty look like school boys at predicting/molding electorate views though.

Where is Maaaarrrrti?

One who wants a future   March 5th, 2008 7:28 am ET

Good job Hillary! I, for one, am glad someone is calling out Obama. His supporters follow him so blindly, willing to jump off a cliff if he tells them to. And, the media fails to take him to task on his policies (if he has any). Finally, someone refused to placate his every whim and I love it! He's a fraud and liar. He lied about his NAFTA policies, and then, had the gall to send one of his team to go talk things out with Canada. Here's a news flash Obama: there is no need to go whinning to and blaming other countries when a campaign doesn't go your way.

Everyone that is upset with Hillary's campaign strategies should take a look at his reactions. If he can't defend himself against someone in his own party, he will fold as the Republicans have an easy time ripping him to shreds. McCain is no political infant. He has played this game before and he will take delight in tearing down Obama.

Moveover, half the nation just doesn't trust this guy. I have been a democrat all my life, was raised by union card holding democrats, but I will not be able to bring myself to vote for Obama. When I look into his eyes or listen to him speak, I shiver with distrust. I don't know what I will do when the general election rolls around, but I do not I will not be voting for Barack Obama. I know I am not the only democrat who feels this way.

Mary   March 5th, 2008 7:26 am ET

Is anyone else noticing that Obama seems to forget the small towns and rural people, and focus on the rich metro areas. Seems to be a similiar scenario, George Bush. I think it is also time for him to get a new speech writer. His same preacher style rhetoric is getting old.

Doreen Augusta Maine   March 5th, 2008 7:26 am ET

No has mentioned that Obama has run an honesty, respectful campaign. I hope the old saying - nice people can never win - isn't true. I don't know that Obama is nice (in the sense of being weak), but he is certainly honest and trustworthy, and doesn't throw all the Clintons' illegal activities at her. But, if she is the Democratic nominee, one can be sure that the Republicans will big time. That is not something I want to hear (again) or watch. Lets end this battle with an Obama win.

Apham Nnaji   March 5th, 2008 7:25 am ET

I guess I am not at all surprised at the press. The story should be that she had about 20 points lead just two weeks ago and Obama was able to make it very competitive. This drama is very good for the media who is loving every bit of this because it improves your ratings. She has not and will make and dent into Obama's lead to effect any mathamatical change with the won delegates.

Ron   March 5th, 2008 7:24 am ET

Great News and a little more comforting.Come on Pennsylvania Hillary needs you now more than ever.Deliver her the knock out punch shes worked so tirelessly for.She deserves it.Go Hillary 08!

Ben   March 5th, 2008 7:23 am ET

Hillary won because she is more qualified and more experienced. These are major victories for her, and you should be giving her a lot more credit. I have not seen reporting this dry given to the Obama campaign. Eat your heart out CNN, your boyfriend is going down.

Sandi from Grand Rapids, Michigan   March 5th, 2008 7:23 am ET

Barack Obama will still win.

He just overestimated Ohio and Texas voters. He point out the irony of Hillary's stand on NAFTA. He failed to clearly and repeatedly make the point that it was Bill Clinton who got us into NAFTA.

He also didn't point out that first lady experience doesn't necessarily qualify as national security experience to answer a "3am phone call".

He's smart. He won't make those mistakes again. Hillary however will try to stay with this NAFTA thing, and her "red phone' ads, and she will be called out on it.

simple thought ?   March 5th, 2008 7:22 am ET

and GOD said to his children, not so fast?
remember the wisdom of your elders?
when all seems dark, they'll guide you to the right choice.
now come home little obamanites and support the real chance for change.
change for the better?
a woman ?

Davidson   March 5th, 2008 7:22 am ET

Bill,
We should also note that a great majority of these folks are also very uneducated and believe the scare tactics that the Clintons employ.

The majority of older people are of course concerned about healthcare and long-term care, do not understand the huge cost of the Clinton plan and monetarily would be worse off.

I expected that Clinton would begin using scare tactics, and put her in the same category as Bush and McCain. What I don't understand is the American people, the politicians, except Obama, manage by fear – the big question is if you are afraid, all the time, how can you move ahead – seems like the old same old stuff.

Scott   March 5th, 2008 7:21 am ET

I guess democrats in Texas and Ohio want to lose in November, because that's what's going to happen if Clinton wins the nomination. Democrats chose the wrong candidate in '04 and will choose the wrong candidate in '08 if Clinton wins.

Joe (Wayland, NY)   March 5th, 2008 7:21 am ET

Why isn't CNN reporting on Clinton's "dirty" campaign ad which showed Obama with much darker skin? (If you don't know what I'm talking about, it was noted on Huffington Post and Daily Kos.)

Hillary Clinton is just plain shameless. She will be a disaster for our country. Everyone who complained about Bush and his deceitful campaigning and manipulating people's fears for political gain – do you really think Hillary Clinton is any different? If so, you're a fool!

gary   March 5th, 2008 7:21 am ET

People should not forget that Clinton won Florida and Michigan decisively which would give her another 300 delegates. Do you actually think the democrats would give up these two states. As for those who say Obama did not have a chance in these states they should also think about the fact that he is able to make his own decisions and is obviously swayed by outside and inside interests.

CHERYL   March 5th, 2008 7:20 am ET

YAY! SENATOR CLINTON!

YOU GO GIRL! WE ARE WITH YOU!

jeff oklahoma   March 5th, 2008 7:17 am ET

Ahhhhh... this has become a race again and with one major difference. Barrack Hussein Obama is no longer the untouchable, media prima donna that he once was. Imagine the sheer terror in the Obama camp that the media will actually begin reporting such stories as the discussion with Canadian officials and the Rezko trial soap opera. I do find it quite amusing that his campaign began spinning the Clinton wins as nothing much last night, instead they focused on the Delegate lead which is nonsense. Add in the popular vote which has obviously tightened and the near reality that Florida-Michigan will count in some form or another. Another thing for the young voters to begin looking into about their messiah. His speech in 2002 at the national convention was indeed eloquent and he spoke out against the decision for the war yet... in a 2004 interview he stated, "I am not sure how I would have voted had I been privey to the information provided to Senator Kerry and Senator Edwards"... sounds fairly similar to the Kerry flip-flop does it not? pair that answer with his continued funding of the war which he touts as "just support of the troops"... however, he could have LED the fight, could have joined Dennis Kucinich and others in removing funding and effectively ending the war.... he CHOSE not to, plain and simple... the anti-war candidate that only spoke out in 2002 and then in his run to the white house. I am so pleased to see Hillary moving her way back to Pennsylvania Avenue!

Yo   March 5th, 2008 7:17 am ET

There were no surprises Tuesday. I think the only truth regarding the outcome of these primaries is that we should put no faith in the polls. Senator Obama successfully decreased the anticipated margins for Senator Clinton in these two states where she placed a significant amount of reliance since Super Tuesday. I think it is clear that he is reaching Americans with his 'speeches'. The ultimate truth for the democratic party is that Senator Clinton could not mount a successful campaign against Senator McCain with all the 'baggage' that she carries from her terms in office and from her 'experience'. It is clear that the republicans are ready to 'eat her alive'.

Mike from Maine   March 5th, 2008 7:14 am ET

I am a local delegate for Obama from my hometown that will cast my delegate vote for Obama in Augusta on the 31st. of May. If Hillary wins the nomination I will have the largest McCain sign on my lawn all summer long. The country needs something new and the Clinton dynasty did well enough for our country when it had it's chance, but hey guys, this isn't the 90's. There ways wont work in this day and age.

PhilT   March 5th, 2008 7:13 am ET

"It's 3 AM Senator Clinton. The NIE report on the is in on the vote to authorize the President to go to war with Iraq. Do you want to read it before tomorrow'a vote?"

"No, thanks. I've already decided to do what's best politically. I'm tired as well. I just want to sleep. Give me the executive summary in the morning."

Is this who we want answering the phone?

Being involved in local Get out the vote campaigns, I've learned one thing from my group's opposition. Negative campaigning at the last moment before your opponent has a chance to respond convincingly works well. I had hoped the boters in Texas and Ohio would have taken this tactic by the Clinton campaign as an isult to their intelligence. I was wrong.

You can fool some of the people all of the time, you can fool all of the people some of the time, but you can't fool all of the people all of the time. Senator Clinton's "fun" with our countries future goes on.

We live to fight her and her campaign's tricks another dqay.

Phil T. – bedford, NH

Tammy   March 5th, 2008 7:12 am ET

In Senator Clinton's speech last night, she made a statement that "no president has ever won without winning Ohio." Can someone please inform her on her history. John F. Kennedy won without winning Ohio.

IHNCNH   March 5th, 2008 7:11 am ET

You've got to be kidding me...what is wrong with people!!!

Michelle   March 5th, 2008 7:11 am ET

YYYYYEEEEEEEE HHHHHHAAAAAAA YOU GO HILLARY CLINTON

YOU'RE SUPPORTERS ARE STRONG AND MANY AND WE LOVE YOU. WE GOT YOUR BACK AND WE ARE WITH YOU ALL THE WAY TO THE WHITE HOUSE.

YOU GO GIRLFRIEND!!!!!!!

Michael, Orlando FL   March 5th, 2008 7:10 am ET

Shame on you Texas and Ohio. You had a chance to end America's nightmare and send the Clintons home. You blew it!

Lena   March 5th, 2008 7:09 am ET

If Hillary wins the nomination I can almost promise you she won't win the Presidential election. The Republicans know Hillary can't beat McCain that's why they're "helping" her! It's a good strategy but if she wins I will be voting for a Republican for the first time in my life.

bonnie j   March 5th, 2008 7:08 am ET

good for her, she is back, but not over.I would like to hear what happened as to why voters were turned away in texas were told they didnt have to vote again, there should be an invesigation as whom told them that and why.here is a comment for all the young voters out there, you are playing with your future, when you are voting with out knowing the issues at hand.this is what i mean,my daughters did a little survey of there own, they are 18 and 21. they asked students and there friends. they said they wanted obama, because hillary was wrong for not leaving bill, because obama is hot, because hillary is evil, because obama wants change all though they didnt know what changes he was going to make, and they couldnt resite our National Anethum . in clueding my daughters, i think it is great that young voters are getting involved, but i wish they would really think this out and think about how this can affect there future. i am voting for hillary , because i am thinking of all the issues she can solve, for better future for the united states of america.
bonnie J, rome N.Y.

John   March 5th, 2008 7:07 am ET

Didn't go your way did it? Are you crying now? ALL of CNN show their
obvious disgust for a great lady, and obvious support for the SHOWMAN. What do you think about her now.?.She's a fighter and a WINNER. Obama should for once is his life, do what is right for AMERICA. QUIT.

Chuck Lauria, Suwanee, Georgia   March 5th, 2008 7:07 am ET

Perhaps one of the most famous quotes in U.S. History was made by FDR: "The only thing we have to fear is fear itself." Democrats & all Americans would be wise to take heed of these words as the Clinton campaign tactics continue to morph to the dark side & become more & more "Rovesque".

Lynda   March 5th, 2008 7:07 am ET

Congrats to Hillary!!!!!!! I am really tired of hearing about negativity and fear cards. The things that Obama are being confronted with are things he should be explaining. These will not go away as he would like. I am also a little tired of hearing that race is not playing a part in this election???? Even the news media says Obama should win this area or that area handily because it has a large African American population! That's not about race?? Obama needs to get real, things are really going to get tough from here on out. Finally, the press will be looking at him even closer and the Republicans will be putting him under a microscope. If he has anything to hide it will be in the headlines.

MIwacth   March 5th, 2008 7:06 am ET

This proved that Americans' voter can't be bought by flooding the air with ads. And late deciders proved that people want to know more about Obama before closing the deal for him. Especially the incidents happened within last 48 hours. Conclusion is Obama deserved to be tested. Americans can't be fooled by more ads.

josh   March 5th, 2008 7:06 am ET

YOU MAKE ME PROUD AS A MAN, TO KNOW THAT YOU ARE FIGHTING FOR MY,MOTHER, WIFE AND DAUGHTER, GRANDMOTHER AND EVRY WOMAN WHOS EVER BEEN STEPPED ON IN THIS WORLD CONGRATS YOU GODSEND YOU!!!!!!!!

Larry   March 5th, 2008 7:06 am ET

She succeded in making her negative campaign work against obama. I personally for one am very exhausted about this sort of politics. I blame obam somewhat for allowing himself to be bullied by hilary. If hilary wins the nomination by her negativity which seems to be working, she would have succeded in dividing the democratic party and watch the African American votes going for John Mccain. It is time Black America, our vote is our voice and our power. It seems majority of America cannot just bare the thought of a black president even amongst the so called "DEMOCRATS"! Maybe as black people in America, its about time we wake up and realize that the so called democatic party does not mean FAIRNESS, PROGRESSIVENESS. All this has been a mess, the divisive politics of hilary has finally worked, lets see if Good or evil prevails this time, history has shown it that America usually gets it wrong, i mean George Bush was elected twice running under the campaign of fear and it worked for him. America America, the fact is race is always going to be an issue in this country, so i encourage every african american reading this today, Pls consider voting for John Mccain if and only if Hilary wins the democratic nomination in a dirty manner. We will make our voices be heard this time around, the Black vote is not a right of anyone party!!

josh   March 5th, 2008 7:04 am ET

GOD BLESS YOU HILLARY. god knows your destiny no matter what happens you Will win.and yes I'm a psychic.

Kasia   March 5th, 2008 7:04 am ET

We knew Hillary would come through in the important states. It's time for Richardson and Edwards to endorse her now. And perhaps Obama should bow out and start building his resume for a real run next time.

don from Canada   March 5th, 2008 7:03 am ET

You forgot to mention that Clinton's win can be attributed to the right wing, George Bush loving Canadian government, for releasing misleading documents aginst Obama helping Clinton win these two buig primaries! I am sure this Canadian government would love to see Clinton win the democratic nomination so McCain can trounce her and keep the Republicans in power for another four years.

vanchava   March 5th, 2008 7:02 am ET

It looks to me that Obama will get the most delegate out of Texas due to the counties he won etc Dallas, Houston, Austin. I'm not sure about San Antonio

Ella, Virginia   March 5th, 2008 7:02 am ET

Keep going Barack!! We know that you WILL be the nominee!! Hillary's desperate tactics are just a smoke screen!!

ChicoSez   March 5th, 2008 7:01 am ET

How will the Obama camp spin this one? The only way to win in Nov is a Clinton/Obama ticket.

Made in America!!!   March 5th, 2008 7:00 am ET

America needs a President you will deliver.. Hillary has been making CHANGES for a long time now and her record PROVES IT!!! We want Real Change, and not someone who still needs to be tested and has show some back bone. I say we look for a Clinton/Obama Campaign.

Mike Goodwin   March 5th, 2008 6:59 am ET

Why does cnn.com have a Hillary Clinton link next to a John McCain link in the header on cnn.com/POLITICS/ and no link for Barack Obama??

This is subtle, but it suggests that she is the candidate who will run against Sen. McCain. Besides not being fair, the last time I checked, Sen. Obama was ahead in the total delegate count!

So much for objective reporting.

SN   March 5th, 2008 6:56 am ET

What appened to all the endorsements that Obama had in all these states? I thought CNN predicted Obama will win in all these States! I guess Ted Kennedy has to work still harder and Opera has to spend more money! She better be on the look out that she dosen't file Chapter 11 now!

YOU GO HILLARY!

Sean   March 5th, 2008 6:56 am ET

Well... thanks to the media and a lot of dumb Americans the Clintons can continue to break down the Democratic Party. I don't want to hear the blue collar workers in Ohio and Texas complain when the factories continue closing and they can't find jobs! You had your chance to get "CHANGE" but you chose to have more of the same! When will you people get it? What we are really beginning to see is the deep seeded racism this country still has. You can see the racism in the "Latino Vote" and the 65 and older group "seniors". Good job Democrats – Keep on voting for HRC because that's the easy road for McCAIN! What a bunch of idiots, the party leader couldve been chosen tonight but instead – the Republicans get to sit back and watch Clinton continue to bad mout h and ruin the partys character.
Haven't you Democrats ever wondered why you've only had 2 Dem Presidents in the last 40 years in office? (Clinton/Carter)
PREPARE YOURSELVES FOR FOUR MORE YEARS OF BUSH SUCKERS!!! (unless Obama wins)

Victor   March 5th, 2008 6:54 am ET

THIS IS WHAT A PERSON WITH PERCEPTIVE COMMON SENSE SEES: I see one campaign within the democratic party, running a professional and dignified race. I see the other campaign doing anything and saying everything to win.

Clinton campaign is without morrality. How can people want someone leading our country, who is deceptive, doesn't stop at anything to get a result, rearranges truths, has no respect the vote of the people of america, and will risk degrading a fellow democrat in order to get what SHE wants?

Hillary is not for the people. She is for herself. She basically says, all of these votes, that people have taken the time to register, doesn't mean anything, it's up to a handful of americans to decide who gets the nomination. WRONG! Then, why did we vote???

This is a model of how she will carry on business. SHE WILL ONLY RECOGNIZE, RESPECT, AND TAKE ACTION FOR THOSE WHO SHE DEEMS ARE IMPORTANT TO HER AND HER INTEREST. The usual protocol in Washington.

Hillary is not running to lead the people. She is not running for the people. She's running for herself and her glory. That's why she doesn't care what she says about Obama. When you have no scruples, your hands aren't tied on any mode of operation; just, whatever works.

I do not trust Hillary. I see that she is fairly underhanded, and manipulative. She is divisive. She ignores whatever isn't appealing to her own interests.

I don't think Obama is so great, but, he holds himself to more of a professional and dignified call to leadership. I believe he cares about what he says, and want just say anything. I believe that what comes out of his mouth, is not just a manipulative ploy. I believe that Obama transcends the usual protocol of politics. I believe that he has a connection and understands what the MAJORITY of voters want.

Alex Mackin   March 5th, 2008 6:53 am ET

By the way, the fact the democratic race is going is continue is GREAT news for the democrats. McCain will fade from the front pages. All this hubbub about the party destroying itself is overstated i think. Nowhere have you heard that the party's been damaged. Its been talked about and talked about, nothing else!

Plus if we go to the convention undecided, the excitement just before the election will be much, much greater than on the republican side, which will have been decided long ago and will have faded from the news.

KEEP THE RACE, KEEP THE PRESS

Pat Russeau   March 5th, 2008 6:53 am ET

Maybe now Wolf Blitzer and Jack Cafferty will not be so anti Clinton and pro Obama. What happen to fair and impartial news reporting. The top two quilty people on CNN are Jack Cafferty and Wolf Blitzer. I am a Lou Dobbs independent, but I'm all done with CNNm sorry Lou, but they are too much for me. Bill Schneider is too pro Obama for my taste also, but no one really cares about him one way or another. The stars are Wolf, Jack and Lou. Lou knows how to be pro no one and for the people. It is a shame that Wolf and Jack can't do the same.

DISGUSTED   March 5th, 2008 6:53 am ET

The media bought into her SNL victimization and Hillary got even dirtier with free reign. The reality is that there is no way in heck she can with the general election. She is too divisive. She is either intent in tearing down the democratic party if she doesn't win, or is helping McCain win. More people would vote against her than for her in a general election.

Garvin   March 5th, 2008 6:51 am ET

Please ask the Question :- When does a 80,100, 200. delegate count lead declare a mandate on who should win the Democratic Nominee or an expression of what the country wants?? And if Florida and Michigan had there delegates counted Hillary would be in the lead?

TERRY   March 5th, 2008 6:51 am ET

yaaaaaaa the comeback girl ..... finally everyone is seeing OBAMA for more than his eloquent speeches .... his friend in Chicago under indictment ... The NAFTA wink and nod to Canada ... he will ONE DAY make a great leader .... in about 9 years ... after PRESIDENT HILLARY CLINTON

BL-NYC   March 5th, 2008 6:50 am ET

Senator Clinton won despite (and against) all odds. Obama spent double the money and his cult is huge...
This is the kind of leader we need, the kind that will not back down and hold her head high...

John   March 5th, 2008 6:50 am ET

Why at the top of this website webpage their is a link to only John Mc cain and Hillary Clinton and their is none for Obama isnt he the democratic candidate with the most delegate come on CNN stop sleeping with Clinton and play fair.

Belle   March 5th, 2008 6:50 am ET

Obama will continue to try and do damage control....

Clinton perhaps stopped her bleeding...

More states left to vote....still a nailbiter

What happens if Obama is called as a witness in the Rezko trial?

John Karsten   March 5th, 2008 6:49 am ET

Well, I see nothing changed last night as everyone expected. Oh well, I guess we will be hearing hail to the Queen in Jan 09. God help us...........:-(

Alex Mackin   March 5th, 2008 6:48 am ET

Barack Obama and his supporters have elevated themselves into another world, at which the rest of the planet looks at a distance. Hillary clinton is the grounded candidate who can best tackle America's challenges in the 21st century with a realism and rationale that's been absent in the white house for the last 8 years. Plus, she brings someone with her that's done the job before. Can't top that.

malka   March 5th, 2008 6:48 am ET

Thanks to Ohio and Texas for Hilary's win. They certainly do understand what a great president she will make. SHE IS RIGHT FOR THE COUNTRY!!!!

ruffdeezy   March 5th, 2008 6:48 am ET

Obama is still dominating in the delegate count. I don't think she can reach him. Winning texas by 3% and Ohio by 10% does not close the gap. Obama will be president if he's the nominee, Mccain will be president if Clinton is the nominee. I think Obama has won a total of 26 states now. He should be the nominee.

my favorite Obama quote:

"We are one nation.....We are one people....And our time for change has come!`

Go Obama!

John Schamber   March 5th, 2008 6:46 am ET

This is for all the media outlets. How many times do you have to wake up with egg on your face? Hillary Clinton proved many of you wrong.... once again. I wish the news media would get back to reporting the news and not commenting on the news. Too many in the media give their opinions and personal comments about a candidate. Your opinion doesn't matter – just the voters, so please shut up with all the opinions!

Thanks,
John
Mobile, AL

Bill W   March 5th, 2008 6:46 am ET

I don't get it. She is Pro NAFTA and brought the large Indian outsourcer into America. So how does she become anyone's choice on economic issues? I just have to figure this was the race card, the rebels down there voted against the black man, and the gender card, the women came out in droves to vote for the woman. Sad that we still live in the dark ages. This could have been over, this monarchy, but people are too stupid.

Scott C   March 5th, 2008 6:46 am ET

Clinton can talk all she wants to about these wins in Texas and Ohio. Congratulations to her. She still trails in the delegate count and can't make up the ground to take the lead.

As for the arguement that she won the "big states" like California, New York, Ohio, and Texas, please go look at the raw data here on the CNN website. Even Obama's losing vote total in those states is more than the Republican winner and almost more than the top 2 Republican winners combined. The Democrats will carry those states no matter which one is the nominee. Hillary can't manage a win in any state that isn't traditionally Democratic while Obama could win any state in a race against McCain.

Obama has the coalition to win in the so-called "red states" come November along with the "blue-states". It makes me sick to hear candidates and the media talking about not bothering to campaign in a state because of how it voted in '00 or '04. Is that really trying to bring the country together? How do you affect change when you only involve 13 out of 50 states, Senator Clinton?

Obama '08! Yes we can!!

Ohio Democrat   March 5th, 2008 6:45 am ET

Yes!! Don't count Hillary out. We did a good job here in Ohio.

Amy in Iowa   March 5th, 2008 6:45 am ET

Hillary kept Bill Clinton hidden away so she could win. Bill Clinton won't be hiding should he ever get a chance to get back in the White House. This campaign is a cover for a third term for Bill. It is well known that Bill tried to change the constititution to allow for a third term.

carrie   March 5th, 2008 6:44 am ET

I CAN NOW UNDERSTAND WHY THIS COUNTRY SEEMS TO GET WORSE EVERYDAY.WHEN WE HAVE SO MANY IGNORANT PEOPLE WHO WILL ACTUALLY VOTE FOR HILLARY WITH HER DIRTY TACTICS,BECAUSE BARRAK IS OF ANOTHER RACE.COME ON,WE SHOULD HAVE EVOLVED FROM THIS.SO SHE IS USING THE RACE CARD AND THE EXPERIENCE CARD AGAINST BARRAK,IF SHE MISTAKINGLY WINS THE DEMOCRATIC NOMINATION,WHAT WILL SHE USE AGAINST MCAIN.HE IS WHITE AND HAS ALOT MORE EXPERIENCE THAN SHE AND HER PHILANDERING HUSBAND COMBINED.HILLARY IS A CLOSET REPUBLICAN.SHE WANTS TO DIVIDE THE DEM PARTY AND THE COUNTRY.I MIGHT AS WELL MOVE TO AUSTRALIA.

laura   March 5th, 2008 6:44 am ET

Buyers remorse!!! People are finally realizing that Hillary is the viable candidate and that Obama is a fake!

The longer this goes on, the better. Obama will be exposed and Hillary will win big.

GO HILLARY!!!!! NObama!!!!!!

Bill Grisenthwaite   March 5th, 2008 6:43 am ET

Everyone forgets that Obama's lead is artificial, because Senator Clinton won both Michigan and Florida and received NO DELEGATES. The voters in those states are being disenfranchised. Senator Clinton has won most of the big states.

Jared   March 5th, 2008 6:42 am ET

Only in the recesses of an egomaniacal mind could one consider last night a victory. After seeing huge double digit leads evaporate within weeks, Clinton needed to win big to make any case to continue this fight. Not only did she not win big...or big enough...but she's facing a remaining primary schedule that will most certainly see Obama's lead increase further. This an Evander Holyfield-like moment – will someone please throw in the towel for her before her reputation and dignity disappear completely?

Jim Hoover   March 5th, 2008 6:42 am ET

Clinton encouraged NAFTA.She does not disclose her tax . She loans 5 million dollar to her campaign.She charges 2% interest on her loan.The donors of Clinton campaign pay for her loan interest. With so much negative against her, she still wins!!! I have no idea why this is happening?

Amy in Iowa   March 5th, 2008 6:41 am ET

Obama won and is still leading in delegates. Clinton won the popular in Texas based on her "fear" card strategy and the media.

Orlando from Sevile, Spain, Europe   March 5th, 2008 6:40 am ET

Our view on these Democratic Primaries and Caucuses is this is much like a tennis match. Mr. Obama keeps the lead in sets, but Ms. Clinton is winning every matchpoint.

The point is time is running out. There are no many sets ahead, and numbers clearly favour Mr. Obama. And, eventually, there must be a tie break.

If Mr. Obama shows just half the toughness we could see in Ms. Clinton, surely he will be able to clinch his nomination. Anyway, whatever happens, I wish good luck to Democrats. You might need it.

Annamica, OH   March 5th, 2008 6:38 am ET

Thank you! Thank you TX, OH, and RI for making Hillary Clinton the comeback kid!

vanchava   March 5th, 2008 6:38 am ET

I was suprised. I was sure Obama would win by a slight edge. This is great for her but I still don't understand how she will make up the math.

DEMOCRAT!   March 5th, 2008 6:37 am ET

you know why she won. because she scared people with her adds. She is soooo desperate and I hate it. what a jerk.

steve o   March 5th, 2008 6:33 am ET

just do the math, Hillary can not win this thing. If she continues to stay in the race, it is only to damage Obama so She can run again in 2012. The question is when would the democrats reliaze this and rally around Obama. My guess is not soon enough. Obama will win the nomination but lose the general election thanks to Bill and Hillary Clinton. Old dreams don't die easily

Robin Wagner from ct   March 5th, 2008 6:32 am ET

OH WOW 2% not a big win looks like he won cacause in tex . AND DELEGATES > Barack Obama

Darshan   March 5th, 2008 6:31 am ET

Seeing these figures will no doubt enrage Obama's youth vote, for many of whom this election represents their political awakening after years of indifference.

To see their choice of nominee being undone by a demographic (>65) which has little to do with the next 8 years in america beyond cashing in social security cheques would undoubtably be disheartining.

What would be of more interest is where the voters who identified themselfs as republicans voted (some 1/10ths according to exit polls) and whether these votes were done in good faith or an attempt to hijack the democrats to suit their needs.

-Obama/Edwards 08

David J. Brien   March 5th, 2008 6:27 am ET

Its Great to watch Democracy at work,slow at times but thats part of the nature of the "beast"!! Hundreds of thousands of People involved,many differant and Opposing Voices,and not one death or injury attributed to this rather Marvelous System,unlike many other places in the World,and just recently!!......you should give your selves a pat on the back America. As one of your Northern Cousins, (I'm Canadienne), I wish you all the very Best America, A Woman or a AfroAmerican man? America! You have come Sooooo! far, that I'm not sure if you realise what you have accomplished to this point, it is a Monumental achievement! and even more so, when one or the other is Elected!!! Again ,the very Best of Luck! D.J.B. Vancouver,B.C.

J.R. Vierria   March 5th, 2008 6:24 am ET

Wait a minute! Democratic primaries award delegates proportionally right? Then what was this about Latino counties in the south not having an equal number of delegate representation as those whiter counties (of same size) further north or closer to larger cities? I must have heard it wrong . . . otherwise it would seem to suggest that a vote cast by a non-Latino has more "worth" than that of a Latino voter in the south. Since Hillary carried those counties near the border, she was not awarded delegates proportionally. How was this magic number arrived at? How many Latinos does it take to equal a white vote 1.3, 1.7, 2, just what is the math? And why is one registered voter's voice more important than another? Seems unconstitutional.

CHRIS in Orlando   March 5th, 2008 6:15 am ET

Tonight's results showed something important: Obama's shady land dealings, and his campaign's lies on the trail, are beginning (FINALLY) to be noticed by the media, reported, and judged as reason to doubt his candidacy by voters everywhere.

Obama does well in caucuses, where voters stand in front of each other and raise their hands. When voters don't feel pressured by others, however, Clinton whoops him. The privacy of a voting booth = votes for Clinton. Remind me, are there any caucuses come November?

Tonight Obama's lawyer tried to loot the Clinton campaign's conference call. Despicable. But when someone will enter into suspicious land deals with criminals, should any other tactics surprise us?

Hillary '08... Yes We Will!

Dottie Herman   March 5th, 2008 6:04 am ET

CNN and the entire neww mefdia can take credit for Hillary's victory by ignoring Obama for an entire week (as they did to John Edwards) and also featured all of Hillary's kitcchen sink attacks on Obama whether true or not. This shows who really picks the President of the United States. You must be very proud.

Marc Kulkin   March 5th, 2008 6:02 am ET

Bill, As Hillary looks for a rationalle for gaining the nomination, I pose the following possible analysis:

What if only the votes of registered Democrats were used to apportion delegates, would the delegate totals change?

Judith   March 5th, 2008 6:01 am ET

How many illegals voted in Texas?

Nathan   March 5th, 2008 5:58 am ET

If Clinton can get a do over in Michigan and Florida on the same day as Pennsylvania she would probably be leading in delegates.

Closely Watching   March 5th, 2008 5:57 am ET

Couldn't help but noticing that when Clinton FINALLY scores a few wins Obama congratulates her in his speech...too bad she was never gracious enough to do the same. Her speech was, as usual, full of the
word 'I' while his was nothing but 'We'. The people of this country will prevail and Obama will win this contest!

Obama '08

Charles, Maryland   March 5th, 2008 5:57 am ET

Bill,
Can it really be the white men in TEXAS have found the character to admit their error and voted for Hillary? Or did they finally realize that the cupcakes the conservatives and republicans had sold them were actually buffalo chips? No matter if it was a newly discovered sense of character, or Haaaay! These ain’t cupcakes!!! The white men in Texas that showed up and voted smart deserve credit.

OPRAH   March 5th, 2008 5:56 am ET

great job hillary

Agatha   March 5th, 2008 5:55 am ET

COMMON SENSE RULES !!! After 8 years of the Bush Administration and delusional thinking we want someone who will work for the people. Hurray for Hillary Clinton!!!

Obama's time will come when he starts doing his job, like going to work for the American's who voted for him. He complains about the conditions in Afghanistan when he has the power to hold Foreign Relations meetings to hold NATO accountable to our American solider's condition over there, but he has not attended ONE meeting. What part of Common sense don't you get when it comes to WORKING FOR THE PEOPLE, like Hillary Clinton has done for years.

The two CNN commentors, black guys, keep trying to wash the mud off their faces by saying Hillary Clinton does not have any experience. She GOES TO WORK for the people who elected her. Your guy, Obama, thinks his charisma is more important than attending the meetings he was elected to go to by his state.

What about Obama's 140 "PRESENT VOTES" instead of voting a "yes or no" in his Illinois state congress. He votes neutral on issues such as allowing sex shops and adult show next to schools and other areas where children are playing.
He has two little girls and he allows sex shops to be located next to schools? Who paid him off to make him vote "present", instead of "NO" on that bill?

His entire campaign is based on him being better than Hillary Clinton because of his judgement.

The American people who vote for Hillary Clinton will be the people who have common sense and who work hard for their money.

mnjam   March 5th, 2008 5:55 am ET

This country needs change. Not a senile man versus a woman whose votes come entirely from geriatrics.

Margi   March 5th, 2008 5:54 am ET

If Hilliary manages to steal the election, I, an Obama supporter, will vote for McCain. I hate dirty politics, and this has become real dirty.

Joe NJ   March 5th, 2008 5:54 am ET

You can't win the nomination without winning the big states and the battleground states.

Presidential Politics are not only about numbers; the DNC Party elders know this and the superdelegates know this. That's why the system was created.

All of you over educated Obama supporters who only rely on book smarts and never were able to learn the lessons of life; you are in for a rude awakening!

AHH! Look how poorly these spoiled snobs act when they don't get their way. Mom and Dad have always made sure you've gotten everything you wanted; now you have no idea how to act when you don't!

It must really sting to be slapped into reality by the calloused hand of the American worker.

AGAIN, this is PRESIDENTIAL POLITICS! It's not for the faint of heart. and it's not for amateurs..Put on your big boy pants and stop whining!

Obaby-bama has boxed himself into a corner and good luck to him in getting out.

BTW!! WHERE IS THIS HUGE "DOMINATING" DELEGATE LEAD THAT YOU ARE REFERRING TO?

CA,NV,NM,TX,OH,NJ,NY,MA,MI,RI,FL,NH,TN,AZ,AK= 263 ELECTORAL VOTES add 21 for PA = 285 and the WHITE HOUSE!

THAT IS THE ONLY MATH THAT MATTERS!! DEAL WITH IT!

Adrian O'Connor   March 5th, 2008 5:52 am ET

CNN is unbelievably lopsided in its coverage of the Democratic primaries. As observed from outside the US (I'm Irish) this news channel has all but endorsed Obama. Like all papers or news organisations of record it is surely your job to give a balanced review and comment. Stop trying to make the news happen and start reporting it.....fairly. regards etc.

Former Clinton Supporter   March 5th, 2008 5:51 am ET

Wonderful, MSM, because of your help, she wins TX and OH...now you want to tell the truth...it's mathmatically impossible for her to win the nomination. Clinton's ego and desire to win will tear down the democratic party.

Tanny Loyola   March 5th, 2008 5:51 am ET

Hillary win in texas and ohio, she
doing great and do hard for the
campaign, we the supporter of hillary
are always there to call you and wake
up you only Hillary is the answer what
now facing crises In America, Hillary
have urgent respond for the big
economic problem the crises with made
by President bush, hillary can do a lot
of changes and good future of America.
I'm pray for you victory we believe for
you aim, vision and goals of America. I
watch last night live in CNN news i see
your victory and also the victory of
TEXAS and ohio country. You make a
right choose people. Thank you for
supporting Hillary by win of Hillary is
also your win. I'm never stop doing
blog in washingtonpost.com, im fight
for the right and truth and also by
guiding the holy spirit of almighty
God. I make 24hrs blog and anwers the
supporter of OBAMA of there wrong
belief, they are keep atten. with me
there and also the supporter blogger of
Mccain's, Mccains supporter is agree
with me and they are now Hillary
campaign do. yeahhhhh Thanks to God.

Supporter of Hillary from Philippines
Tanny Loyola

RICK CARVER   March 5th, 2008 5:50 am ET

"OBAMA" YOUR NO HILLARY CLINTON !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

VoterforHILLARY   March 5th, 2008 5:50 am ET

WHOOOOAHHHHH. Go Hillary!!!!!!!!! I can't wait to see you in PA!!!

You are the one who will lead this country to do better AND to be better!!

I support you Hillary all the way!!!!

PENNSYLVANNIA FOR HILLARY

Martin   March 5th, 2008 5:49 am ET

Another factor in Ohio for Clinton is Racism. Since the Klan has one of it's largest chapters in Ohio, Cincinnati is one of the most racial divided cities in the US, and having lived and worked in Ohio I've experienced first hand significant established racism there. Lots of "sunset" towns. It looks like Ohio has once again had a negative impact upon the US political situation. Looking forward to when they lose their electoral college votes and even better if they lose congressional seats as most of the young people (especially educated ones) are fleeing that dump of a state.

Maryam   March 5th, 2008 5:47 am ET

Bill Clintons ebdorsement of Louis Farrakhan Million Man March and
Reunion article New York Times during his Administration. Health Insurance Companies have started increasing rates in preparation for Universal Health Care how do Sen Clinton plan on combating this? if the prices increases so drastically iin some instances before she take office.The Health Insurance alrady would have one up on Sen Clinton because she will only be able to reduce cost to where they wanted it ,This game being played by the Health Insurance will still create unaffordable Health Insurance because of rate hikes occuring now.I couldnt afford it before the increases and now I making decision between food,utility cost and rising healthcare cost. I dont want to end up in a food line or the welfare line. Her new ads have children of Caucasion and Latino . I think it represents separations and if she plan to cross the party lineand get her so call change to move America ahead this is not wise it worked for TX,NM, CA ,Fl largely populated with Whites and Latino to help her wins.

KE   March 5th, 2008 5:46 am ET

Another math.
Here is winner takes all state delegates in November math. At this stage.
Hillary 1646
Obama 1270

Question.
Is Obama's NAFTA scandal fundamental blunder for someone who is applying for a top official position in the country? If he gets a nomination can he (with his own words) convince voters voted for Hillary to get behind him? (Challenges ahead)

Chijioke   March 5th, 2008 5:45 am ET

Clinton's success is based on the fact that CNN started giving her coverage lately. I had commented on this fact several times before even the Clinton campaign knew where their problem was lied. Negative and unnessasary coverage of what President Clinton said and what not . You guys in media can make and break. I could liken you to liquor. Turn-on and turn-off. Whenever I watch people like Kellyann and Carl Bernstein, I get so upset. It does not matter what topic was raised, they always go straight to the Clintons. They have a deep rooted hatred for this family . These are the kind of coverage Mrs Clinton received. Thank you for waking up.
I used to think that the press is supposed to educate and not impose their opinion on people knowing that the population in general can be tilted either to the right or to the left easily, and that is why it is hard to get the middle. People like Lou Dobb who can think and analyze things for themselves without the Schneiders, Bernsteins and their likes.
Bill, remember when President Bush the senior was mad with you in
2000, when your reporting was tilted away from his son, President Bush. That is how I feel sometimes when I listen to you guys. Lou Dobbs will always be the BEST. Jack Cafferty is another one those that always find fault with the Clintons. Too bad.

andre   March 5th, 2008 5:42 am ET

GO HILLARY'08
YES SHE WILL WIN!!!

She's the best for America and to the World.

From Portugal!

Jerry Eversole   March 5th, 2008 5:42 am ET

Hey man, why don't you just call it like it is instead of being totally one sided. You "CNN" people are trying to be an Obama free tv campaign promoter for him. At least give it a 50-50 call and don't be negative to one "as you now are" and be a man about it and be even handed. You should not be telling people who will win or how people should vote, only how they did vote.
Fair and Balanced is just a click away and more and more people are going there. They don't like it but they at least know it's a biased station and they can read between the lines.
Thanks in Advance and Please ...... give them both 50-50 unbiased reporting.

Former Clinton Supporter   March 5th, 2008 5:39 am ET

Good job media, you did it. You gave Hillary the wins in TX and OH!!! Hillary is a disgusting mud slinger and only won because she used scare tactics and everyone knows that!!!!

OBAMA 08!!!!!!!!!

Andrea Fuentes, Miami FL   March 5th, 2008 5:35 am ET

Clinton's win was also influenced by a flurry of positive publicity about her (SNL appearance, etc.) and her hard campaigning on the ground.

But I believe the perfectly timed mudslinging about NAFTA and Rezko worked in her favor. Had those issues been brought up even a day or two before, those stories would not have "had legs.' It's unfortunate that she showed that negative campaigning and smear tactics still work in the United States of America. That is quite disappointing.

Willy   March 5th, 2008 5:35 am ET

Down to the Big Media's 3 liberals; McCain, Obama & Mrs. Bill Clinton, hold your nose folks.

Ito, Yokosuka Japan   March 5th, 2008 5:34 am ET

Props to Clinton. This was Obama's to win and he couldn't deliver when he had to so he deserved to get the rug pulled from under him. He has no one to blame for these losses but himself.

That said, the silver lining is that Clinton made little more than a very small dent in Obama's delegate lead so this still spells disaster for her in the long run.

I'm sorry, but if she can't get the popular delegate vote, she is toast. If she can't win this without the super delegates she is in TROUBLE.

Clinton can't just can't run even keel with Obama. She has to win big in big states cause the small states won't do it for her.

The greatest disappointment here is that she had to get where she is today by running a negative campaign. So everybody looses when that happens. If we can't win fairly and honorably, then we don't deserve to win. So Clinton, in essence, is saying that she doesn't deserve to win but she will do what she must to win, even if it means dishonoring her and the democratic party in the process. That's pathetic and I hope Obama is vindicated in the end by holding the popular delegate vote. And I hope Clinton is embarrased in the end, put to shame, and exposed for the self-serving opportunist that she really is...cause we all know what she is really about...and that is divisiveness, blame-gaming, finger-pointing, and not taking responsibility for that bad with the good. Clinton is a low-life and don't let her cooky smile deceive you.

Shame on the media for wanting this drawn out longer than it needs to be. They are faciliting the process becoming a mochery of what should be a decent process.

Props to McCain for being the only truly decent candidate in what the Clintons and the media have turned into a game.

Ronda Clough   March 5th, 2008 5:34 am ET

Madam President has such a nice ring to it.

Does It Matter   March 5th, 2008 5:29 am ET

To say that I'm disappointed would be a gross understatement. If Clinton wins the nomination, I'll be voting for Nader.

cecil   March 5th, 2008 5:28 am ET

WELL DONE, BILL,.... EXCELLENT ANALYSIS! LOOKS LIKE THE OLD GEEZERS AND THE FICKLE MINDED ARE WINNING THE DAY . TOO BAD A DYING GENERATION IS DECIDING THE FUTURE OF THE YOUNGER GENERATION......

Jim, American in Paris   March 5th, 2008 5:25 am ET

Long live Texas and long live Hillary our next President!!!

Dr Renee Levant   March 5th, 2008 5:21 am ET

However in terms of delegates She wins only 2 since she won by a very small margin.

And it is likely that Obama will receive 6 or 7 delegates from his larger victories in Caucuses.

So really since Texas chooses their delegates and winner by the TWO STEPS

The OVERALL DELEGATE WINNER in TEXAS is most LIKELY OBAMA

And Clinton fails to make up the gap of Pledged Delegates from all the March 4th Races

Teta Eubank Wagner   March 5th, 2008 5:18 am ET

Democrats should strongly support Barack Obama NOW.
Clinton will continue her fear-tactics ads, as she did within the past week. This will hurt the Democrats in the November election.
Obama is a man of integrity, the finest and most charismatic candidate either Democrat or Republicans have had a chance to vote for within the past half century. A fine president serves to inspire and lead, and has the good judgment to choose his cabinet wisely, bringing the talents of both liberal and conservative thought together in the best interest of all our people in America.

Thanks for giving me a chance to express my opinion.

Gregor   March 5th, 2008 5:18 am ET

Ok everybody, keep calm. The math is simple: There are 3253 pledged delegates at stake. 2642 are pledged now (over 81%). States with high black population are coming up: Missisippi, North Carolina, even in PA are much more blacks than hispanics. On 04-22 (PA primary) 2960 delegates will have been pledged (91%): And HRC will still be (minimum) 120-140 pledged delegates behind, with less than 300 delegates coming up:
OBAMA SUPPORTERS – LET´S BE HAPPY ABOUT THIS VIEW!!!
WE ARE GOING TO WIN THIS!!!
But: HRC, please stop damaging our party with your dirty campaining.

Juan Carlos(Vegas)   March 5th, 2008 5:17 am ET

Corrupt media do not ever underestimates Senator Clinton, She is a fighter. I had a lot of fun watching long faces on TV. How many times the media have tried to take her down, but Clinton is a bad motoscooter jajajajaja.

Rasheeda   March 5th, 2008 5:14 am ET

Did Hillary win by Ohio and Texas Republicans taking Rush Limbaugh and others advice by voting for her?? What have your polls showed in regards to this?

The Analyst   March 5th, 2008 5:11 am ET

Obama has shown again he can't win the big states that determine the election winner in November.

There will still be a swing in delegates today – around 20 more to Hillary than Obama. It eats into his lead slightly – bringing it down below the 100 mark. That can be eroded if Hillary builds on the momentum from today. If Florida re-runs its primary then the cat will surely be amongst the pigeons.

Obama found it easier in earlier contests because there was not a big gap between contests to allow voters/press to analyse his policies and character. With Rezko now on trial and doubts surfacing about Obama's honesty I can see this not being decided until June.

Dan Du Bois   March 5th, 2008 5:06 am ET

Texans to whom the debates were "important" or "very important" went for Clinton by landslide margins. Combined with those who made up their minds during the last week, shows that she won the most recent debates. I also think the last two Saturday Night Live skits helped substantially.

ToddT   March 5th, 2008 5:05 am ET

Momentum, momentum, momentum.... Hillary's campaign is unstoppable. Obama may want to listen to President Bush’s words stating that he should concentrate on the primary before he starts attacking Senator McCain and President Bush. Additionally, Obama may want to spend a few days doing his job in the Senate, which has been neglected for the last year. Maybe some progress can be made in Afghanistan before Hillary becomes President. By the way Mr. Obama, Hillary is gaining in the delegate counts by wins in Ohio, Rhode Island, and Texas. Obama’s campaign my want to hire a delegate counter so he knows that he is losing the delegate lead. And the trend is just starting.

Rodney   March 5th, 2008 5:03 am ET

I AM SO PROUD OF ALL THE VOTERS IN TEXAS, OHIO AND RHODE ISLAND. I WORKED THE POLLS ALL DAY IN TEXAS WITH SOME AMAZING SUPPORTER FOR HILLARY AND WE DID IT!!!!!!!
"For everyone here in Ohio and across America who's been ever been counted out but refused to be knocked out, for everyone who has stumbled but stood right back up, and for everyone who works hard and never gives up - this one is for you," Clinton said before supporters in Columbus.
Hillary Rodham Clinton, March 4, 2008
You see hope is not defined by just the spoken word, it is defined by the reality that we can actually do anything that we are willing to work hard and fight for. She will lead us to a more prosperous union.
GO HILLARY 2008 PRESIDENT!

David   March 5th, 2008 4:59 am ET

If America fails to rise again the press needs to be standing at the fore of the blame line, I hope you all are listening to the superior argument of Obama. why does the press help in spreading wrong information? It is very clear Hillary would rather have McCain win than see an Obama in the white house because of selfish pride. You can be sure you all will be so sorry in years to come if she is allowed to have her way. What is hurt this election most is the sensationalism attitude of the press chasing mindless stories. If it got no sleaze then the press is not interested, while there is so much misinformation out there.

CNN, I wonder why you guys decide to descriminate against accurate and precise comment yet you post a whole lot of lame arguement.

Jon, Los Angeles   March 5th, 2008 4:55 am ET

This win by Clinton is NOT impressive as she got help from Rush Limbaugh and his followers. Obama is the true Champion.

Barry Davidson   March 5th, 2008 4:50 am ET

I identified a "RUSH L" republican Clinton "crossover" voter in my Dem caucas tonight. He represented 1 out 9 voters for Clinton in our north Dallas caucas. The RUSH L voter in my opinion out an effect on the out come of the election sense it was so close.

John, Las Vegas, NV   March 5th, 2008 4:47 am ET

She who cackles last, cackles best

Alex from IL   March 5th, 2008 4:46 am ET

CNN needs to stop pretending like like this was a big win: she was only ahead by a percent or so. Several weeks ago, obama was 20+ points behind.

Anyways, I attribute this win also to late deciders: constant complaining that the media was somehow against her paid off big time, and no journalists bothered checking their sources on any of the stories her campaign made them report. Moreover, the main-stream media didn't bother to mention that she STILL hasn't revealed her tax info, something obama did months ago. Or that she uses corporate and PAC money while obama depends on over 1 million individuals donating.

Jennifer, NY   March 5th, 2008 4:44 am ET

Congratulations to Hillary Clinton! She is clearly the best candidate, and may I say from New York – to all those people who believe the old Rove propaganda, she is a nice lady, extremely competent, and a terrific Senator.

Wisconsin   March 5th, 2008 4:41 am ET

Texas was so close that journalist who are not bias towards Clinton would call it a tie. Yet this article talks about overwhelming support form groups and big margins.

LOL

You would never know the results were 52% to 48%

Good journalism would be talking about a tie,

But then again this is CNN, basically Fox News but in bed with Clinton..

AnnAloha FairMedia,PA   March 5th, 2008 4:40 am ET

50 Million, Union Endorsements and Out Spending Senator Clinton 4-1 in some states....and still didn't deliver.
The PEOPLE have spoken.

David   March 5th, 2008 4:39 am ET

If America fails to rise again the press needs to be standing at the fore of the blame line, I hope you all are listening to the superior argument of Obama. why does the press help in spreading wrong information? It is very clear Hillary would rather have McCain win than see an Obama in the white house because of selfish pride. You can be sure you all will be so sorry in years to come if she is allowed to have her way.

Rod in upstate NY   March 5th, 2008 4:38 am ET

Attribute her win to Democrats. Senator Clinton has been carrying registered democratic voters typically by 57% in every primary. It's been indies and crossover repubs that have skewed voting to Obama. This democratic majority is why Hillary Clinton is staying in and is very worthy of the Superdelegate swing vote.

Dave Froyalde/Washington   March 5th, 2008 4:37 am ET

Way to go Hillary!!! There is no stopping now for you to be the eventual nominee of the democratic party. Please continue to do what you are doing. The voters of Ohio, Texas and Rhode Island are smart enough to know that what you are offering to the nation are clear and specific anwers/solutions to our countrys' problems. CONGRATULATIONS!!!

Ravi   March 5th, 2008 4:30 am ET

the world outside of america -if they think there's a world out there- is not surprised by today's winners! after all, a war-mongering nation can only choose a war-waging 'commander-in-chief' – McCain or Clinton!

nathan   March 5th, 2008 4:01 am ET

Remember why John kerry lost…he was weak in national security. Obama can never win against Mc Cain. We need a democrat in white house. Hillary is our best chance

glucose merchant   March 5th, 2008 4:00 am ET

John McCain should make Mike Huckabee his running mate and Senator Obama should make Senator Rockefeller his running mate as well, as we head to November.

John R. Webb   March 5th, 2008 4:00 am ET

We have to remember that it is Sen. Hillary Clinton that is runing for president. We are talking about apples and orangers when we speak of Sen. Hillary Clinton as just Clinton. Sen. Hillary Clinton has a mind of her own, she has a plan to bring us, the people of the United States of America back to where we should be, so just remember it's Sen. Hillary Clinton and Not Bill Clinton who is running for president. Since this all began Obama has played the race card. Take a look at the numbers it comes out as Sen. Hillary Clinton as President of the United States of America. Thank You. (Disabled Viet Nam Vet. 1963-1965)

kevin   March 5th, 2008 3:58 am ET

I told you America. Clinton is the best candidate and it showed tonight. It is time for Obama to think VP at best.

Claudia   March 5th, 2008 3:53 am ET

QUESTION: Do you know why Hillary won Texas, Ohio and Rhode Island?

ANSWER: Because half the country can't stand the arrogant, juvenile, and insulting behavior of the Obama supporters. You call Clinton supporters a bunch of poor, uneducated old people and yet, my friends and I are all professionals with advanced degrees and are all 30 and under. But yet you persist with these false labels and verbal attacks.

LESSON FOR OBAMA SUPPORTERS TONIGHT: You Reap What you Sow.

Demetri Demo   March 5th, 2008 3:50 am ET

Before the inevitable "OBAMA SUX", "HILLARY NEEDS TO DROP OUT" smears begin, at this point, as democrats, we have to realize that we will not win the general election if we grow to hate one candidate or the other.

I for one will be pleased no matter which one is nominated, because BOTH are great for the country. Don't lock in to one candidate or the other; just because Obama or Hillary wins the primary, that does not make him or her president!

Do not make the democrats of the opposing candidate your enemy! We all will need one another come November!

Tony   March 5th, 2008 3:41 am ET

The DNC has to make this a positive issue and focus the attention on the fact that these two democrats are working on ideas of change for the country and that the country is considering what type of change to make. They need to point out that McCain and the status Quo politics are a thing of the past. Because the Republicans are now going to go into the mode of reframing every argument and be able to point out that the democrats can not make a decision on what they want to do. These are the two messages moderate, non party affilated voters will be considering during the next few months. The next few months are very important, now that the Republicans have their canidate. If McCain moves quickly now to solidfy his base by suggesting a conservative running mate and then starts to reframing the debates to favor the republican views, and he has the time to do so, he will make big gains with moderate voters and regroup his conservative base. I sure hope the DNC can get on message and head this off while Clinton and Obama finish this up. Time is not on our side as Dems right now.

Mary   March 5th, 2008 3:39 am ET

To all the Hillary Haters (who have no idea why they hate her), to all the morons who post their unoriginal thoughts here every day (you know who you are) and to all the idiots who will waste a vote for McCain if she gets the nomination...HAVE A NICE DAY.

Love you Hillary!   March 5th, 2008 3:35 am ET

You just keep up the fight.

I know that you can't catch Senetor Obama in the delegate count but eventually people will see that you deserve to be our presidential candidate!!!

We'll take this all to the convention and cause chaos until they give you the nomination...even tho you have less delegates! You can't beat Senetor McCain but that's ok we'll follow you forever you witch you!!!

Patti   March 5th, 2008 3:28 am ET

I am so thrilled for the victories Hillary had tonight. Our country will be blessed when she becomes first our democratic nominee and second our President. I hope everyone remembers to Vote Smart...Vote Hillary 2008, the best candidate for the most important job in the United States. She is the only candidate that genuinely cares for each and every one of us, the only one who will be ready on Day One... Vote Hillary...2008

elizaveth   March 5th, 2008 3:28 am ET

I hope we can get rid of the Obama Pout. The media has given him a total free ride, actually disapponted that Hillary won. Sorry CNN,MSNBC and all the males who can't stand the fact that a woman can actually win. You should be ashamed of yourselves.

kathy   March 5th, 2008 3:26 am ET

Now let's see how everyone–including CNN–downplays Clinton's BIG win. Don't worry, Hillary, you supporters have your back. NICE JOB!!!

Kathy   March 5th, 2008 3:25 am ET

I really think she won Texas and Ohio and RI because the press finally are taking a hard look at Obama. Hillary has always been better on the economy, health and foreign affairs. People are seeing Obama for more than hype and hope now. They are looking at his past and future realities.

Dave K   March 5th, 2008 3:21 am ET

Constitution vs. DNC rules?

I don't know the law well enough but doesn't the constitution trump party rules?

19th and 26th Amendments prohibit the federal government and the states from forbidding any citizen to vote due to their sex or age (if over 18). Nothing specifically addresses the issue of denying a citizen the right to have his/her vote counted regardless of "a political party" rule but I have to believe that the right to have a citizens vote count would be upheld over a political party "rule" no?...

Ellizabeth Couch   March 5th, 2008 3:21 am ET

Hurray Hurray for Hillary – keep up the good work. I'm watching and praying for you. Our country looked good when you were in Washington.

Texans for Hillary   March 5th, 2008 3:21 am ET

Us well-heeled Texans voted for Hillary too!

Gayle from Oregon   March 5th, 2008 3:18 am ET

Go Hillary! We need you. I would love to see us Oregonians have a say in this primary. Let the voters decide! This is a democracy right?

k. rove   March 5th, 2008 3:16 am ET

I was truly undecided until the last moment. I was leaning towards Clinton due to her better presentation of issues and solutions vs. slogans and rhetoric. I was disturbed by the "3am" spots, however. . .when Hillary got that call at "3am" to make the right call on the Iraq war, she failed the test. While I'm sure Obama would be a fine democratic nominee, I feel Clinton would be a better president. So, at least in the primary, she got my vote, with deep reservations. I easily could have gone either way, but felt it was too soon in the nominating process to send her packing.

Angela   March 5th, 2008 3:16 am ET

"Yes We Will"...........Viva Clinton Viva!!!!!!

Tom   March 5th, 2008 3:13 am ET

Obama looked VERY weak tonight in his speech he NEVER looked forward and was looking and reading off the prompters!

Agnita   March 5th, 2008 3:08 am ET

Again, CNN the biased news channel

Mary - Independent   March 5th, 2008 3:01 am ET

Congratulations Hillary! Keep up the momentum and win the rest of the Primary Elections. You have a lot of supporters who want to see you as the first female Commander-in-Chief in History. THIS IS CHANGE!

Derek Steinbeck   March 5th, 2008 2:55 am ET

How wonderful it is! After all she went through , she deserves this great victory. She had to fight against the media who reported most of the time in favour for Obama and she had to fight in all states against the advantage that Obama had regarding money. So many ads have been running , sometimes his advantage was 4 to 1 , but still he couldn't beat Hillary Clinton. Even that all the Hillary Clinton haters who never would vote for a Democrat helped him as well .
I congratulate her formidable stand and wish her all the best to win the nomination. Only she is strong enough for the tough struggle that the USA faces and she is the only one who can win the election with John Mac Cain, who I regard also as an American hero and I have a lot of respect for him. It's good to see that the people slowly understanding the champion for America, Hillary Clinton

Derek Steinbeck

SAM   March 5th, 2008 2:51 am ET

Well Done. Now its clear – HILLARY '08

Janice Hough   March 5th, 2008 2:47 am ET

We worry if McCain is too old to be president. Is anyone wondering if some of these 65 + voters might be too old to vote for president?

John in KY   March 5th, 2008 2:44 am ET

3 of 4 ain't bad "GO Hillary"

tony   March 5th, 2008 2:42 am ET

if yon add up the super by the state they won hillary has a big lead in supers if you go by winer take all like in november its even bigger

Ron Az   March 5th, 2008 2:42 am ET

Schnider needs to re-evaluate his thought process's!! The way I see it is, Hillery got the seniors vote because seniors are much wiser then the young and inexperienced. Why do news people always say seniors vote because they are afraid of their retirement, Or savings or such dribble as that. Maybe seniors just know when people are right and can see through young people. It really doen't take a genius to see that Obama is inexperienced and people want an experienced person in the whitehouse. If you want to see Mc Cain squirm, ask him whet he is going to do about the econemy. He'll be the first one to tell you he doesn'y understand math. How is he going to rework the econemy.

Angelica Ayala   March 5th, 2008 2:37 am ET

I agree, I am latino and Obama came down here, I heard him speak and heard her speak; My vote was for Hillary! (She is true at heart... he can WOOO you with his speech, but she has experience to back her words.) She did many things as First lady , as senator, as a true person. Imagine what she will do as president! On the other hand he has been senator, okay and now running for president...hmm that's it ..Do we really know him? The argument he makes that he was right from the start... he wasn't even on the senate to agree or opose the war. Please I can say I was right from the begining but who really knows my opinion if I never had the chance to really vote on it . GO HILLARY 2008 !!!!

Peter B   March 5th, 2008 2:35 am ET

This race is the most EXCITING I think I have ever witnessed and may go down in history as such.
Unfortunately, as a Democratic (Liberal in Canada) supporter, I worry that this split between these two EXCELLENT candidates may hurt the Democratic Party for the fall election against John McCain. The Democrats need to decide soon so they have enough time to build a national campaign, including financial support, to defeat the Republicans in November...GOD FORBID another REPUBLICAN in the White House....even though I like John McCain!

MJ   March 5th, 2008 2:31 am ET

The momentum for Obama has finally been broken. It goes to show you that when Obama is scrutinized, just a fraction of what Hillary went through, he fails the test. Also, the people that decided are not the young voters who are still in College, and under their parents healthcare, but by ADULTS who have real jobs and real issues in the real world. Congratulations Hillary. Onward we go!!!!

Cathy   March 5th, 2008 2:30 am ET

I think perhaps the older vote is going with Hillary because they have seen alot of presidents come and go. They know what they are getting with Clinton, not with Obama

Amie Alexander   March 5th, 2008 2:29 am ET

Texas, which I live in, literally had some of those republican groups that abandoned there party to vote for Hillary because they knew McCain had he nomination locked in. They want Hillary up against McCain so they can win. He will pull all her dirty secrets out.

ToddT   March 5th, 2008 2:29 am ET

Hillary Clinton is a proven winner. Democrats all the way!

marnell burke austin, tx   March 5th, 2008 2:26 am ET

Hillary Clinton won, not because of her "Red Phone" add or negative statements, but because people were getting burnt out on Obama.. Every time you turned on the T.V. or radio it was Obama, Obama. The media's negative comments towards her had the biggest influence in her turn around.

Vig   March 5th, 2008 2:26 am ET

The best is yet to come. Hillary Clinton – you're looking at the next President of the USA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Geneva from OHIO   March 5th, 2008 2:24 am ET

Before we have any Obama supporters claiming she won based on negative attack adds...I will point out....I live in Ohio. I voted for Hillary. I have received FOUR negative brochures slamming Hillary and using misquotes to get attention. I have seen TWO adds about why you shouldn't vote for her....I went to a Hillary Rally, and head nothing negative about Obama. I received nothing about Obama....and it isn't for lack thereof. Ohio voted for Hillary based on the economy and unions, and only 16 % of young voters that shouted for Obama showed up to vote and 35 percent of that number voted for her.

She has won the popular vote in a convention the popular vote wins nearly every time.

incredible   March 5th, 2008 2:22 am ET

Obama supporters fueled by the pro-Obama bias media (including you CNN) continue to argue that Hillary won using negative campaing. What is negative about exposing the truth?. THE GUY HAS NO EXPERIENCE. THERE IS NO AMOUNT OF HOPING OR PRAYING THAT CAN CHANGE THAT……..ONLY EXPERIENCE.

Isn't he running on the 'promise' of change?, so we can honestly speculate, question and raise concerns about how ready we think he is to 'change and act' when the time comes to act. He is simply not ready.
Is he experienced?: he is not
Has he heard a single hearing in the arms judiciary and foreing services committee? He has not.
Has he waffled about NAFTA and even lied about it? He has
Has he kept his word about campaing finance reform? He has not
Is he planning to? He is not.
Has he not been hypocritical in his support "off " one year (when did not have to vote about it) and then "on" the next of the Irak war? He has been.
Isn't his health insurance plan leaving 15 million uninsured? Yes it is

So what is so negative about exposing his weaknesses.
If he speculates about the promise of the future. We are entitled to question his readiness. HE SIMPLY IS NOT READY!!!!!

Esther   March 5th, 2008 2:22 am ET

Big super Tuesday II for Hillary Clinton!!!!! Still more states waiting for her to win and she will do very well.

What else she need to demostrated that is the clear best democrat ticket for the general election on November 2008?

Thanks Texas, Ohio, Rhode Island and voters in VT for the big night!!!!

GO HILLARY CLINTON, the next President of the USA!!!
God bless America!

TW, MILWAUKEE, WI   March 5th, 2008 2:19 am ET

GO HILLARY!!!!! THE VOTERS HAVE FINALLY SEEN THROUGH THE OBAMA SPIN....WHEN THE SPEACHES ARE ALL OVER, WE NEED A STRONG AND PROVEN LEADER WHO CAN LEAD THIS COUNTRY AND STAND UP TO THE UNCERTAIN CHALLENGES AHEAD...HILLARY CLINTON IS THAT PERSON. SHE NEEDS TO GO ALL THE WAY....IF ANY ONE HAS TO THROW IN THE TOWEL, ADIOS BARACK.

KAMEEDAH   March 5th, 2008 2:19 am ET

Wake up everyone, Hillary's win should be a wake up call to all dems who chant "yes we can" Your guy cannot make the cut. Hillary has once again proven that she is the peoples choice. The candidate who wins the bigger states should be nominated because that is what counts in November. Ihope CNN and other news channels can now get over the Obama fever. I have said it several times that it is Clinton haters, and students who do not pay bills that vote for Obama. Anyone who is concerned about the future( war, economy, foreclosures and jobs )will not take a second chance at inexperience. I hope we continue to support Hillary

california love   March 5th, 2008 2:16 am ET

Only people who belive in HEARTS, RAIMBOWS, HEARTS AND UNICORNS voted for OBAMA..

Oh I forgot, also the ones who belive in the EASTER BUNNY...

Dan   March 5th, 2008 2:16 am ET

Good lord. When will these "analysts" quit their bias in their reporting. The whole wording of 95% of the cnn articles smack of obama bias. Just look at his wording above insinuating these are the only groups that picked her.

haynes   March 5th, 2008 2:16 am ET

What ever happened to the good old Days of One Voter One vote.

Mike   March 5th, 2008 2:14 am ET

(PLEASE post for Hillary's supporters, we deserve this)

Gee, do you hear that? What? Oh, It's all the Obama supporters crying!

For weeks now, the Obama supporters have been going on and on about Hillary's campaign, that it would come to an end on March 4th (due to her losing Ohio & Texas), well, THAT didn't happen now did it?

So, how does it feel to have egg on your face?

Go Hillary!

You are truely "the come back gal..."

helen   March 5th, 2008 2:14 am ET

CNN has been very bisa through out the coverage of this election. Tonight will be the last time I will read and serve their net.

P. C.   March 5th, 2008 2:12 am ET

Obama supporters were at the polls in Austin TX telling Clinton supporters that they couldn't attend the caucus.

Tobias   March 5th, 2008 2:09 am ET

Still for Hill!
;-)

MARYLOU JONES   March 5th, 2008 2:07 am ET

HILLARY CLINTON SHOWED THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES TONIGHT THAT SHE IS A FIGHTER! SHE IS THE ONE WE WANT IN THE WHITE HOUSE TO FIGHT FOR US! TO FIGHT FOR OUR DOMESTIC NEEDS, JOBS, HEALTH CARE, EDUCATION, GREEN ENERGY SOURCES, REPAIRING AND REBUILDING OUR INFRASTRUCTERS, SECURING OUR BORDERS AND OUR SEA PORTS. SHE WILL FIGHT TOOTH AND NAIL TO GET THESE THINGS DONE. SHE WILL FIGHT FOR US IN THE WORLD BY RE-DEPLOYING OUR TROOPS WHERE NEEDED, TO REDUCE OUR DEBT TO FOREIGN COUNTRIES, TO REDUCE OUR DEPENDANCE ON FOREIGN OIL, AND TO RAISE THE ESTEEM OF THE UNITED STATES IN THE WORLD! A FIGHTER IS WHAT WE NEED! EXPERIENCE DOES COUNT, HILLARY PROVED THAT TONIGHT! VOTE HILLARY CLINTON FOR PRESIDENT!

Latino Supporter for Hillary   March 5th, 2008 2:04 am ET

Look at the map of the U.S. and you will see that Sen. Clinton has won the southwest–states with huge Latino populations. All the talk of pushing her out of the race leaves a question wide open for the Democratic Party elders and her opponent's supporters: will you move to disenfranchise Latino voters? By margins, in some states, by 2-to-1, Sen. Clinton captured the Latino vote. To devalue the Latino vote, may become one of the party's most notable mistakes.

Larry   March 5th, 2008 2:03 am ET

Congratulations Hillary- greetings from PHILIPPINES.. You deserve to be the next US president. I have the feeling that you will be a catalyst for real change.

CHINO   March 5th, 2008 2:03 am ET

Now that is what we call THE COME BACK KID!!!

GO HILARRY IN 2008!!!

CHINO OF ORLANDO, FLORIDA U.S.A.

ManhattanMichael   March 5th, 2008 2:01 am ET

All the way to the White House...send Nobama back to Illinois and let him grow up a little more.

HILLARY 2008!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

JP SW   March 5th, 2008 2:01 am ET

And RI and Ohio and Texas...YES!

Nothing can stop Hillary now! PA is next and she will win that.

You can argue all you want about delegates. Who do you think the Democratic Party will want to be the nominee? He who won several states that will not win the presidency or she who can win the states that will win the electoral votes!

Go Hillary...Thank You Texas and Ohio and RI...you ROCK!

Well......   March 5th, 2008 1:59 am ET

Winning is only part of the entire analysis.......Senator Obama spent 4 times more money in Texas than Senator Clinton. No wonder he does not want campaign financing – he would have lost by a landslide had he not put so much money into the state. That to me is just buying the votes....simple.

Hey, anyone know from the campaign how much Obama camp actually collected in February? They hadn't disclosed as yet that I know of.......probably alot less than what they touted!

Go Hillary! Strong, capable, informed, experienced, formidable and a winner!

Lora   March 5th, 2008 1:59 am ET

That sounds like a nice, objective analysis. Good reporting, Bill.

HIllary came back with a bang. No knockout–yet–but certainly off the ropes.

Hillary '08   March 5th, 2008 1:59 am ET

Yes she will!!!

Yes we will!!!

Hillary Rodham Clinton, President of the U.S. '08

Lin   March 5th, 2008 1:56 am ET

Hillary wins because people realized she has a clear plan and she is not just talking about "change". I hope she can carry this momentum and win the nomination as well as presidency. This country does need someone like her to get back to its property.

Austin, Texas   March 5th, 2008 1:56 am ET

I'm proud to be a texan and to have contributed to Hillary's run for president. I believe she is the only one capable of bringing us out of the hole we're in.

Austin Texas   March 5th, 2008 1:56 am ET

I'm proud to be a Texan

LOM   March 5th, 2008 1:56 am ET

Did anyone let Jamal Simmons know that Senator Clinton was the projected winner of Texas? He sure didn't seemed convinced during Larry King Live with Lanny Davis.

PETER ORIAVWOTE   March 5th, 2008 1:52 am ET

Congratulations. Keep this momentum please. Victory is yours.

Gary for HILL   March 5th, 2008 1:51 am ET

HILLARY is a fighter with substance. The Latinos of Texas carried her, she will be grateful for that! OHIO is a bell weather state, whoever wins in OHIO, she will win the nominations and the WHITE HOUSE!!!
People in WY, MS, & PA! Join the the bandwagon!!!!! VOTE HILLARY!

BlackMAN 4 Hillary 08   March 5th, 2008 1:51 am ET

Hillary just shows me u should never give up! You never know what blessings lay ahead. never count a fighter out! All the fighters know Hillary will fight for us!
Hillary Congrats from Texas

Manuel TX   March 5th, 2008 1:50 am ET

Go Hillary!

Way to fight for it!

We worked our butts off for you here in TX. :)

The COMEBACK KID part II.

shaun   March 5th, 2008 1:49 am ET

Bring it on baby, bring it on...WE WILL NOT ALLOW YOU TO HAVE THIS VICTORY, NO WE WON'T...NO... WE..... WON'T

GO ANYONE BUT HILLARY

Josh   March 5th, 2008 1:49 am ET

CONGRATULATIONS SEN. CLINTON!!! WE ARE ALL PROUD OF YOU!!! We know you can go on to win Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Kentucky and Indiana...because you have already won the KEY states needed to succeed in a campaign.

Hmm....looks like the good (CLINTON) will prevail over the evil (OBAMA)!

"YES WE CAN....YES WE DID...AND YES WE WILL!"

HILLARY '08, '12!!!

Angela   March 5th, 2008 1:47 am ET

Oh my gosh!!!! I listened to Obama's speech…

Is anybody but me HORRIFIED that in his speech he claimed that 'only in America could a young man who used to herd goats in Kenya move to America and marry white girl'???

Marry a white girl? is that what most black men aspire to do? marry a WHITE girl???

I was horrified….

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room. Download this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

twitter
@wolfblitzercnn: New SitRoom start time. Beg. mid-Jan, we're on 5-7p ET. Our excellent team can focus on 2 solid hrs. Less becomes more.
Updated: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 06:45:58 -0800
@psteinhauserCNN: New CNN Poll: Tiger Woods' standing with Americans takes a big hit but there appears to be a big racial divide - http://bit.ly/6dW44s
Updated: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 05:28:45 -0800
@wolfblitzercnn: Trifecta -- NOT. My Redskins, Bills and Packers all lose this weekend. Very sad.
Updated: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:40:09 -0800
@HornickCNN: RT @andersoncooper: Interactive: The top 10 Health-Care-Reform Players http://bit.ly/6C3OlX
Updated: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:47:50 -0800
@HornickCNN: RT @cnn_oppmann: CNN.com: Mexico City approves same-sex marriage. http://bit.ly/5RyMnk #mexico
Updated: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:46:26 -0800
Categories
Powered by WordPress.com VIP