March 11, 2008
Posted: March 11th, 2008 09:50 AM ET
 Could Clinton and Obama appear on the same ticket? Clinton appears to be fueling the speculation.
Could Clinton and Obama appear on the same ticket? Clinton appears to be fueling the speculation.

(CNN) - It's an idea that's increasingly getting kicked around, especially by one campaign in particular.

The prospect of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama running on the same ticket has long been the subject of speculation, even before voters started weighing in at the polls earlier this year.

But following Clinton's wins in Texas, Ohio, and Rhode Island last week - a trifecta of victories that essentially salvaged her presidential hopes - the New York senator and her surrogates have repeatedly raised the issue themselves; raised it so often, in fact, that Obama made sure to shoot down the idea at a campaign event in Mississippi Monday.

"I want everybody to be absolutely clear," he said. "I'm not running for vice president. I'm running for president of the United States of America."

"This kind of gamesmanship, talking about me as VP but not ready for commander-in-chief, that's exactly the kind of doublespeak, double-talk that Washington is very good at," Obama added.

Obama isn't the only one who thinks Clinton has something up her sleeve when she raises the issue. CNN Senior Political Correspondent Candy Crowley says the Illinois senator's campaign clearly recognizes its rival benefits from the increased speculation of a joint ticket.

"They understand that this is a way for the Clinton campaign to play some politics here," Crowley said. "If you suggest to voters, who might have some question about Barack Obama's experience, but they like his message of hope and change, that they could have both, and that maybe he could get eight years of seasoning, that's the suggestion here."(Watch Candy Crowley's analysis of Dem dream ticket talk)

Obama's comments Monday followed a week in which the prospect of a joint ticket was pushed by Clinton or a member of her campaign on at least four different occasions. Clinton herself raised the issue twice - once with a CBS interviewer on the morning after her March 4 primary wins, and on Friday during a campaign stop in Mississippi.

"I've had people say, 'Well I wish I could vote for both of you,'" she said. "Well, that might be possible some day. But first I need your vote on Tuesday."

Former President Bill Clinton also weighed in on the possibility over the weekend, calling the possible ticket 'unstoppable.'

"I know that she has always been open to it, because she believes that if you can unite the energy and the new people that he's brought in and the people in these vast swaths of small town and rural America that she's carried overwhelmingly, if you had those two things together she thinks it'd be hard to beat," he said in Mississippi Saturday.

And Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell, a fervent supporter of Clinton's, said on two different occasions he thinks whoever wins the Democratic race should offer the vice presidency to the other.

Gloria Borger, a senior political analyst for CNN, called the comments a Clinton "talking point."

"They're trying to say to people, you know 'wink, wink, if you make Hillary Clinton the nominee, she'll bring Barack Obama along.' It's a talking point, which is that with Hillary you get two for the price of one—if she is at the top of the ticket."

But there's no denying the Clintons recognize the strength Obama would bring to a presidential ticket. Each has attracted a distinct segment of the Democratic electorate: He consistently does well with upscale voters, independents, and African-Americans while she has performed well among women, older voters, and members of the working class.

"Thee Clintons clearly believe that Obama on the ticket would both unify the party and be a draw, particularly to those African-American voters who have been flocking to him. There is clearly some sense it would cement a Democratic victory."

So would Clinton herself accept the No. 2 slot should Obama finish the race on top?

"I don't make any predictions," Borger said.

– CNN Ticker Producer Alexander Mooney

UPDATE: Clinton said Monday all the V.P. speculation has taken on a life of its own:

"This thing has really been given a life of its own. A lot of Democrats like us both and have been very hopeful that they wouldn't have to make a choice, but obviously democrats have to make a choice, and I'm looking for to getting the nomination and it's preliminary to talk about whoever might be on whose ticket," she said while campaigning in Pennsylvania. "But I believe I am ready to serve on day one."

Filed under: Barack Obama • Hillary Clinton


John   March 11th, 2008 8:03 am ET

Wake Up Hillary! It's past 3am! Stop dreaming about a presidency that you cannot win!!!

Hillary Plays The People!

She knows most Americans don't try to find out information about the candidates. She knows most Americans believe what they see on tv, or read online.

This has allowed Hillary to run a campaign based upon one lie after another, and one attack after another all in attempts to make Obama look bad, and to make her look good.

Luckily, alot of Americans are informed! We know the truth about Obama, and we know the truths about Hillary and Bill.

Obama has been an elected official 4 more years than Hillary, which gives him Real Experience In Office! He has worked great with politicians in both partys. He has worked on military and foreign matters more than Hillary. From the beginning, he knew that a War in Iraq was mistake that was not needed. Instead, he knew that Afghanistan and searching for Bin Laden was what was really needed.

It's great that Americans are starting to inform themselves about Obama! The more that people are informed, the more they like Obama, and the more they see Hillary for what she really is... a liar!

Now, she is contradicting herself!!! One day seeing Obama isn't fit for office, then the next day offering him VP, just so she can win instead of him.

carlo   March 11th, 2008 8:03 am ET

What is all of this "Hillary can do better?" SHE IS LOSING! And just think us Obama supporters are supposed to be drinking the KoolAid.

Don't forget, Bill had even less experience than Obama, and heck, most of us voted for him, including me. Hindsight is 20/20.

Paul - Manchester, England   March 11th, 2008 8:02 am ET

I have watched the Democratic race, like many others in the UK, with great interest. I cannot see how Hillary Clinton's outburst has in any way aided her cause. Just as when I was a child I used to whistle when I was nervous or afraid, it seems Hillary throws out these sort of deflections when she knows she is 'up against it'. I do not doubt she could be a good President, but it seems to me that what America needs right now is not just 'perspiration' of the Clinton's "work hard to fix things" type, but real inspiration of the sort that Obama clearly offers. He may not be truly tested yet, but honestly, is she? I dont recall JFK being in senior Political Office before 1960, but he wasn't that bad was he? Please America, give the world the triumph of Hope over huburis....we will thank you for it.

Paaa   March 11th, 2008 8:01 am ET

How can Hillary control the oval the white house when she wasnt able to control the ORAL office under Bill?....

Tony   March 11th, 2008 8:00 am ET

Sometimes it really amazes me how naive the media is. They've been pushing this story for a couple of days when we all know this is just a political maneuver. Noneless, I have to say it's a smart move from the Clinton campaign. They knew Obama would reject the offer so the issue is now not whether Clinton would consider him as VP but how he actually rejected it. This way he appears somewhat arrogant and egotistical, looking for his own interest and not the one of the Country. This issue forced him to be on the spot and not talking about the real issues and what's important to the Mississipi people (in preparation for today's primaries) but how he adamantly rejects the VP spot.

Senator Obama, still a rookie sir.. still a rookie. Hats off to the Clinton camp for this brilliant strategy.

mick   March 11th, 2008 7:59 am ET

The Clintons do know what they are saying and doing.
It is a known fact that Obama is not ready for ths White House or V.P, however with Bill Clinton At the White House Obama could get a good start if anythin,g happen to Hillary, maybe you people should wake up and look at the whole picture, we need change and two Presidents in the White House is Change. Obama does not have a chance

JENA from Woodbridge   March 11th, 2008 7:58 am ET

I cannot believe that Hilary play the dream ticket to win Mississipi. Like I said before, she's EVIL. She doesn't care about the party or America. The only thing she cares about is winning, go back to the white house for Bill to find another Ms. Lewinsky because she's old with lot of rinkless.

Listen my friends, HILARY is not good for the white house again. If she can vote for the war in IRAQ means she doesn't have good jugement to be our President.

Let us vote for OBAMA who can bring all Americains together. Who can bring back americans people on top of the word again.

GO OBAMA 08

PJohnson   March 11th, 2008 7:56 am ET

Bill's the VP choice for HIllary, no doubt about it.

Walt, Belton,TX   March 11th, 2008 7:51 am ET

Slick willie's just trying to feel out the public about him becoming Hillary's running mate. That way he gets to stay at the Vice President's mansion while Hillary is at the White House.

Ladies: The line forms by the servants' entrance........................

Jeff   March 11th, 2008 7:50 am ET

Who's leading the popular vote ie. all democrats in America that voted incl. Mich and Florida.

Who's more popular amoungst the the voters.

Guess Who.

Do the maths.

Tim, Boston MA   March 11th, 2008 7:49 am ET

WATCH WHAT YOU WRITE, SAY OR DO: THE FASCISTS ARE WATCHING YOU! ENJOY YOUR FALSE SENSE OF SECURITY AT THE EXPENSE OF EVERYONE'S LIBERTY!

Ante   March 11th, 2008 7:48 am ET

I am a Nigerian but i have been following closely the presidential nomination of the democratic party. Never have i been most nauseated than the diabolical sugestion made by Hillary that Obama who has won more pupolar votes, more states and above all more hearts of both Americans and the rest of the world to take up the vp slot i truly think she must be hallucinating or better still be an Alice in wounderland let her vent her fustration at her campaign crew or better still throw in the towel and support Obama so that the Democrat can concentrate on the presidential race proper

Sarah   March 11th, 2008 7:48 am ET

I cannot believe CNN and all of there negative comments about Hillary Clinton. Saturday night live tells the true story - I think CNN has a hidden agenda. Pay attention America !! Read between the lines.

This country needs a women and needs someone with experience !!

Go Hillary !!

Anne Webb   March 11th, 2008 7:47 am ET

I wish the press would stop pushing the idea of a Clinton – Barrack or a Barrack – Clinton ticket. BOTH candidates have said this is prematrue and they are focusing on their campaigns. So why does the press keep pushing this? Isn't there some other important news to report on? Last I heard we were still at war!

peter   March 11th, 2008 7:45 am ET

Hillary is as corrupt as everyone says she is that is clear. Obama though is all talk and has absolutly no substance behind him and no experience. The media has given him a free ride. But if he gets the nomination I feel some things from his past will come out and show he is not as high and mighty as he claims. Remember obama is someone who has been in politics for awhile now and claims to be above everyone else in Washington.only one person has the right ideas and the experience and just because he is running as a republican doesn't mean he is going to do the same exact thing as bush, he is on record as opposing many of his ideas. He is very much a different republican a better one.

McCain '08

Rick   March 11th, 2008 7:44 am ET

Hillary cant win without Obama and Obama can win by himself.

Hillary cant beat McCain, but Obama CAN

Hillary is always ME ME ME,

Obama is always WE.

It was We who formed this country, not the ME ME Clinton

Steve-Ohio   March 11th, 2008 7:44 am ET

I am not sure what point Mr. Davey is attempting to make. It is however obvious that the uneducated of which he speaks may have recieved a history lesson from him.

LJB- House of Rep – 1937-1948
Minority Leader Senate – 1953
Majority Leader Senate – 1954-1960

JFK – House-1946-1952
Senate- 1952-1960

Kennedy did not choose Johnson under the same conditions as suggested ( lack of experience--you know.......who do you want answering the phone at 3:00AM ).

Do your homework....must have skimmed the Cliffnotes version.

John Kay   March 11th, 2008 7:43 am ET

Hillary has been using one of the best politician (Bill) to get the nomination. Now she is trying to use the best politician (Obama) to realise her dream.

She has claimed all the successes of Bill Clinton and will soon claim that of Obama. The question is; When is she gonna be independent of other people's achievements and lead on her own?

Ready on day one?????????????????????"'

Tom   March 11th, 2008 7:42 am ET

It blows my mind how anyone can give the big "H" an advantage in the experiance column. Hello, she's only been in the senate 8 years.
Obama what 4? Not much difference.
Of course though it was Ok for her to run for her first office with "ZERO" experiance and never have even lived in New York state. She didn't even know the layout of New York State and certainly not the wants and needs of the New Yorkers but that was acceptable. She new she could take advantage of Bill's coatails. Why do you think his office is in Harlem?
Enough already with the experiance issues. Let's vote for integredy which will exclude her.

Greg   March 11th, 2008 7:42 am ET

EGObama says, "With all due respect" but he did not decline with decency or manners. I think they have a name for that if it were a female.

Ron   March 11th, 2008 7:42 am ET

Jobs, Healthcare, Bring troops home and balance the budget People!
Lets stick with the agenda.Potty mouths are not fit to vote in a grown up election.Nothing but a bunch of nasty teenagers on here

Dan   March 11th, 2008 7:40 am ET

I use to love the political season, but this campaign has become bitter and never ending. The egos out here are absolutely unbelievable. At some point in my life, I would like to vote for a real candidate and not the "lesser of the evils". I don't like McCain (no change), I don't like Hilary (same old thing), I don't like Obama (I need more than inspiration), Paul is obsolete, and Nader is a narcissist. So, who can I vote for that will bring vision and intelligence to this race?

Ali   March 11th, 2008 7:39 am ET

She won't win without him and will only hurt his chances at winning if she is connected to him. She is poison.

T.Lowder   March 11th, 2008 7:38 am ET

Don't settle for less. Let your party and the people tell you they don't want you. Don't concede or give into this VP nonsense! It will never work it will only hurt you in the long run. Look at what happend to former VP Al Gore. He was VP in name only The Clintons technically ran both offices. And look how Al's presidency campagain turned out?
Lace up your gloves and fight the good fight until it is done Mr. Obama!

OBAMA 2008

AER   March 11th, 2008 7:38 am ET

"Politics has become so bitter and partisan, so gummed up by money and influence, that we can't tackle the big problems that demand solutions. And that's what we have to change first. We have to change our politics, and come together around our common interests and concerns as Americans. BARACK OBAMA, email to supporters, Jan. 16, 2007

IF BARACK OBAMA CANNOT UNITE THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY, HOW CAN HE "HOPE" TO UNITE THIS NATION? He talks the talk for unity, but does not walk the walk. He wants to be President only because then he does not have to compromise with anyone. As VP, he won't be the "lead dog" and he knows that unless you are the lead dog the view never changes.

He's just another political hypocrite. Let's see what he does to unite his party.

Jack from Illinois   March 11th, 2008 7:37 am ET

How can you credit Hillary with Texas when it is clear that Obama won more delegates there than Hillary?

Obama won Texas.

Obama '08

Richard   March 11th, 2008 7:36 am ET

I will never vote for Obama or is it Osama ( No difference)!
What is Obama good at? Dividing the Democrats! Talking!
That sums it up!

Go Hillary 2008!

Sara M   March 11th, 2008 7:35 am ET

Obama voters are disillusioned if they think Obama is "Clearly" winning.

Dems CANNOT WIN without Ohio, Texas and Florida. They simply CAN NOT WIN.

McCain is pretty popular in ALL of those states, and what's more, popular in New York, New Jersey and many other states that Obama LOST.

If Obama can't win those states, he can't win the election.

People fail to point out that the little red states that Obama won over Hilary are REPUBLICAN STATES...and McCain got more than DOUBLE the votes than Obama got....Obama can't count those as a win, and any delegate who's not stupid should be able to figure that out if they weren't caught up in the mind-boggling fad of promises that can't be kept.

When it comes down to Republican versus Democrat, HILARY HAS MORE VOTES.

When you remove all of the delegates that will go towards republicans instead of democrats, Obama loses by a long shot.

If we vote Obama, we vote McCain.

And that's not even getting started on the fact that no one has addressed that Florida and Michigan could have purposefully broken the rules, screwing the voters over, just so Hilary couldn't get the delegates there, and knowing it would push Obama out of the race if Hilary won. (Because Hilary would be winning if they were counted, both in counts, AND in popular vote!)

Has anyone stopped to think if maybe the lead-men in charge WANTED florida and michigan to not count?

Think about it.

Scott   March 11th, 2008 7:33 am ET

Sex in the White House...humm...even Kennedy was guilty! Scandal in the White House (why do you think it is white...Brides wear white no?) Mud slinging in a campaign....always what they can't do versus what I can. Truth is, the way Government runs, neither accomplishes anything. Proof....go back and listen to the Bush promises 4 and 8 years ago......humm...delivered nothing but fake WMD's that are live IRD's on our troops he sent over! Imagine what that trillion dollars would do at home towards National Healthcare, Education, homelessness, infrastructure, etc. When I find a candidate that actually is "of the people, by the people and for the people" then perhaps it will be worth my time and energy. Until then, this is Fox Reality TV and most of the World is watching and laughing along! I wonder, what would Goerge, Thomas, Benjamin and the 37 other founders think of how we have run the Country? Anyone look in their tombs to see if they have rolled over?

Barb   March 11th, 2008 7:31 am ET

I want to vote for Obama for "president", not the vice president. If Obama wins the nomination, he wil certainly get my vote. If Hillary were to wrangle the nomination, I will vote for McCain, and I really don't want to do that. I'm a woman in my mid-forties who will not even consider casting a vote for Hillary. I remember the 90's all too well. Oh has she returned the silver and art work she and Bill stole from the White House when they left?

Lydia   March 11th, 2008 7:28 am ET

Clinton has no plans whatsoever to name Barack Obama her running mate. This is Clinton being her usual patronizing, condescending and arrogant self. She is #2 in total number of votes cast. She is #2 in total number of delegates. She is #2 in total number of pledged delegates. She is #2 in total number of states won. For her to suggest a Clinton-Obama ticket is insulting.

Darryl   March 11th, 2008 7:28 am ET

****Mail-in ballot suggested as possible Florida-Michigan ****

This is a bad ideal, see you can not ensure every will get the right information, or verify their right to vote. illegals may try to tilt the ballots.

Polling place it the only was to ensure that proper voting is taking place.

I don't see how we can allow the Bush Administration blow trillions of dollars on a needless war but we can't spend money to properly hold a election to the Highest Office in America, we need to get real.

We need to review what the Attorney General is doing spending $25 million to his own firm, this looks like a Ethic violation or conflict of interest.

In the Bush Administration, American we have took our eyes off the prize.

James, FL   March 11th, 2008 7:27 am ET

Hillary Clinton deserves a better VP candidate and Bill Richardson
is the man! Remember there are more Hispanic voters than blacks so Richardson will solidify the Hispanic votes on both parties to vote for Sen. Clinton. Sen. Clinton/Gov Richardson 08!

PATTY   March 11th, 2008 7:25 am ET

PUT IT THIS WAY, OBAMA'S VOTING RECORD;
The Truth About Obama's Voting Record
Posted by RollinTruth on Thursday, January 17, 2008 3:07:53 PM
The tendency of Barrack Obama to vote "present" on controversial matters during his time in the Illinois State Senate is getting some media attention lately, and his campaign has sought to dismiss the criticism by claiming there were good, sound political strategies involved in Obama's decision to avoid voting.

The most absurd aspect of the whole story is not his votes - which are already pretty absurd - but rather his attempted defense of those votes. Obama's defense of not doing the job he was elected to do? He couldn't vote on those bills, because his votes would've been used against him when he ran for reelection.

HUH? Since when is it a legitimate argument to say, "I didn't vote on that bill, because it would hurt my political future." Even worse is that much of the liberal press has actually accepted this ridiculous, indefensible opportunistic point of view. So, pretty absurd and inexcusable, right?

Oh, but wait - it gets better! Not only does he admit his votes (or lack thereof) were based on purely political calculations, and not only does the mainstream media accept and defend his argument. Deciding to just take the ball and run with it, Obama and his supporters say that not voting out of personal political opportunism is in fact an example of true leadership on these issues he wouldn't vote on!

What is interesting is that during all this examination of Obama's record in the Illinois Senate, nobody is raising the issue of Obama's serial non-voting in Congress. Let's take a look at how he voted during his long one-year career in the U.S. Senate:

He skipped voting on 26 of 59 budget, spending, and tax measures – that means he didn't bother to vote on 44% of these measures during his entire career in the Senate. He skipped NINE out of fifteen votes on health related measures. He skipped voting on FIVE of six transportation measures in 2007. He skipped voting on FOUR of five welfare-related measures. He skipped voting on about half of environmental-related measures. He skipped voting on half of education measures. He constantly skipped out on votes relating to farm subsidies and agriculture expenditures.

He voted AGAINST a bill that would deny legal status to undocumented immigrants convicted of aggravated felonies, domestic violence, stalking, violation of protection orders, crimes against children, or crimes relating to the illegal purchase or sale of firearms. But then he voted FOR a bill reducing the number of guest workers. Now, regardless of one's view on immigration in general, if you had to choose between allowing in MORE criminals or MORE legal workers, which would you choose? That's all I'm saying!

He skipped voting on future military funding for Iraq, as well as multiple other Iraq funding measures, skipped voting on the Iraq Withdrawal Amendment, after first voting AGAINST it a few months earlier; and he also skipped voting on the measure designation Iran's Revolutionary Guard a terrorist organization. But he's been running around the country for months saying he opposes the war and that he'll end the war, while being unwilling to go on record about any of it. I'm not saying he should have voted for a withdrawal, I'm just saying he's like a lot of cowardly liberals who say something but are unwilling to actually risk backing it up with action.

Finally, in an apparent attempt to continue his strong record of leading by non-example from his grand days in the Illinois Senate, Obama skipped voting on two of three abortion-related bills in Congress. At least on this issue, his vote - or rather, non-vote - has remained consistent, I guess.

Well, that's one way to ensure the Republican candidate won't be able to attack him for his record in the Senate - just avoid having one!

MD in CT   March 11th, 2008 7:25 am ET

Bill's Good Idea: A Combined Hillary-Barack Ticket

Fine, have Hillary stop campaigning now and become the vice-president. That would show she is not power hungry. If Obama accepted the vice-presidency then the ticket should read:

1) HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT,

2) BILL FOR MONARCH, and

3) OBAMA FOR SERVANT TO THE CLINTONS

Randy   March 11th, 2008 7:25 am ET

Dream on Billary, Take note Superdelegates!

Randy   March 11th, 2008 7:23 am ET

Of course she benefits, it's just another one of her ploys to try to move "under the table" like the slithering snake she is!
She again proves that she will do anything to try and win this election, at any cost, and any sacrifice, she is hood-winking the electorate and playing on their fears and emotions.

Danny in Pittsburgh   March 11th, 2008 7:23 am ET

Curious that so many posters here who are praising Hillary for "trying to unite" the party are the same ones insisting they'll vote McCain if Hllary's not the top dog on the ticket.

We all need to take a deep breath here and remember that 4 more years of anything resembling the Bush presidency may DESTROY our country as we know it. McCain represents that. And as it stands now, if things "ended tomorrow", Barack Obama would be the democratic nominee.

All this political claptrap aside (and I admit, Hillary's been the engine driving it)...don't get so wrapped up in the battle that you lose sight on the objective of the war.

Kimberly   March 11th, 2008 7:15 am ET

THIS IS GREAT ONE FROM PETER..............

Its really like something out of a movie, where the hero has been beaten by some villain who suddenly changes tone and offers respite and some reward of personal gain if he will only give up fighting the good fight.

Oh wait, am I allowed to call Hillary a villain? I don't want to make her cry or anything

taylor   March 11th, 2008 7:10 am ET

"America The Beautiful' is 100% hilarity, by the way.

Rick, Maryland   March 11th, 2008 7:09 am ET

People act as if she's doing this to help her in Mississippe, she
doesn't need Mississippi, just the way Obama brushed off his
losses in Ohio, Texas and Rhode Island.
Wait till Pennsylvania, another big state, Hillery will wipe out
Obama.
Why can't he just buy the election, oh sorry, he is, outspending
Hillery, 2 and 3 to one and maybe he could get a good deal on
the White House like he did on his own house, what 250,000.00
off.
Go Hillery, 2008.

dan   March 11th, 2008 7:08 am ET

It's questionable how someone behind gives ideas to somebody ahead, get ahead & then give some advice to your followers.what advantage does clinton have to suggest she has better offers for obama, give me a break.

Velle   March 11th, 2008 7:07 am ET

When pigs fly, Hilary! Enough already Hilary, just tell Bill to tell the Emir of Dubai that the UAR will not have the "back door" into the White House that he promised. He'll probably at least let you keep the $1 million contribution for Bill's library!

taylor   March 11th, 2008 7:04 am ET

I have 35 years of experience in saying that I have 35 years of experience!

lpreito.   March 11th, 2008 7:02 am ET

Mr. Obama just take the second sit, you got nothing to loose anyway!

Tom Swift, NH   March 11th, 2008 7:02 am ET

`
I am a 55 year old Independant that votes mostly Republican for President.

This year I am open to voting Democrat. I was hoping Joe Biden would be in the running, but it was not to be.

Voting for Obama is a possibility – I need to see more.

One thing is certain: I will never, ever vote for a ticket that has Hillary Clinton on it. Not ever.

rj   March 11th, 2008 7:02 am ET

America the Beautiful.....is your head buried in the sand?? Have you not seen every poll indicating Obama would beat McCain and the same polls saying McCain would beat Clinton? Watching Spitzer apologize with his doting wife standing by his side sure reminded me of some other politician doing the same thing–but only after lying about it first. Who was that..let me think...oh yeah...the Clintons. Hillary went through that at least three times that we know of. is that the vast experience all her fans talk about?? will she be able to stand in front of the country with him by her side and lie just as well as he did when she says....'i did not have sex with that woman'.

CHERYL   March 11th, 2008 7:01 am ET

VOTE SMART VOTE SENATOR CLINTON!!!!!!!!!

CLINTON!!!!

CLINTON!!!!

CLINTON!!!!

Mike   March 11th, 2008 7:00 am ET

Not a real smart tactic for the Clintons. One of the biggest appeal sof Obama is that he is break from the Clinton sleaze. Show what do the Clintons do - they get sleazier!!

Lucille   March 11th, 2008 6:53 am ET

give a break, OBAMA PRESIDENT OF U.S.A. YEAH RIGHT,i had been a Democrat for so many years, when we get to November Elections, all the Rich people will be voting for Mcain, not for A Muslin wanta be..wake up...one way or another, they will be in the white house for another 8 years....not this losser Obama even the name is ridicules..

GO HILARY, FOR PRESIDENT...

taylor   March 11th, 2008 6:53 am ET

What a miserable tactic from someone without any principles. The Clintons have gotten downright pathetic.

CHERYL   March 11th, 2008 6:53 am ET

YOU PEOPLE NEED TO GIVE IT A REST!

BORACK OBAMA WOULD BE POISON TO SENATOR CLINTON'S TICKET!

I HAVE NO IDEA WHY ANYONE WOULD SUGGEST THAT HE BE ON IT!

THERE IS WAY TO MUCH SCANDAL INVOLVING HIM! THE GOP WILL HAVE A CARNIVAL WITH IT!!!!!!!

MY VOTE IS FOR SENATOR CLINTON ONLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Rita   March 11th, 2008 6:52 am ET

I believe Clinton and Obama would be a very powerful team but one that wouldn't work as I feel they would both be wanting to 'play ' President.

Michael D   March 11th, 2008 6:52 am ET

Spitzer, Hillary Super Delegate supporter, Bill Clinton supportive husband. Sex Scandal, cheaters and liars to thier families and the voters that believed in them. Hillary how can we trust your judgement .
You can't run your canpaign without going broke, we don't need you adding to our problems.

Nando   March 11th, 2008 6:51 am ET

Well Hillary just lost another super delegate Gov. Spitzer was a long time supporter of the CLINTONS!!!!! That figures!!!!

ABC ABC ABC ABC !!!!!!!!!!!!

Heather   March 11th, 2008 6:50 am ET

Hillary is proposing a shared ticket as it is yet another tactic to get her a spot, any spot, on the ticket. If she doesn't come out on top in Denver, then she can lay claim to the VP spot as the inevitable choice.

Why Obama would ever consent to sharing the ticket with her is beyond my understanding. Even as top of the ticket, it raises the spectre of Hillary and Bill just down the hall doing Heavens knows what. The conspiracy theorists would have a blast!

And, I'm not buying the idea that there are no policy differences between Obama and Hillary. Looking at their voting records and CVs, that's just not true. For instance the bankruptcy bill and the Iraq war: she was for them before she was against them. And, the shared presidency of Bill & Hill has a lot of legislative baggage, e.g., welfare reform. Why are 'downscale' voters still voting for Hillary given this record?

BCarlisle, San Ramon CA   March 11th, 2008 6:50 am ET

All of this is just talk, exactly what Obama is about, all talk no action. Does it really matter what Hillary says about VP ect. She in my book made her point and got Obama fired up and mad, he does not look good when he is mad. The motivational speaker look is better. Without that he hasn't a chance. Keep hammering Hillary we all love a good fight (don't anyone deny it otherwise your just lying to yourselves!)

Hillary 08! VP W. Clark....Obama is to green!

Rick, Maryland   March 11th, 2008 6:49 am ET

Obama reject's the idea but that's the closest he will ever get to the
white house, he's a Chicago thug and he's proving it.
I wouldn't hire him as dog catcher.

miss independent   March 11th, 2008 6:47 am ET

we dont need speeches but clear solutions.. thats what hillary is all about.she knows what shes talking about and her experience says it all..
i dont think barrack would do anything since hes alawys flip flopping with issues like NAFTA and climate.he said he would invade pakistan and yet he he says he doesnt support the war in iraq..he is contradicting himself flat out..
the man just says whatever makes the people like him..we dont need a popstar or someone likeable,we need a leader.hes a good man and thats all there is to him..he is too young and doesnt fully understand or grasp the meaning of being commander in chief of the most powerful and unpopular country today..
wake up and see who brings actions to their promises..

Ronald, American living abroad   March 11th, 2008 6:45 am ET

HRC's only HOPE is that she can get near the White House on Obama's coat tails. She should be ashamed of her duplicity. James Carville's slight of hand on Larry King Live was indiciative of the desperation of the Clinton control freaks in the Democratic party. The Party and the Country has had ENOUGH of the Clintons and their divisive form of politics.

Why aren't they releasing those tax returns? Spitzer's misdealings were first noted by dubious financial transactions. What are the Clinton's trying to hide?

I bet this one won't get posted!

Lori   March 11th, 2008 6:39 am ET

Hillary has been saying for the last 13 months...Obama is not qualified enough to be President. So why would Hillary want someone who is not qualified to be Vice-President? Since Obama is in the lead..maybe she should be his Vice-President!!!

Sincerely,
An "O-ba-ma-Momma"

Ito, Yokosuka Japan   March 11th, 2008 6:32 am ET

HRC is garbage. Everything that comes out of her mouth needs to be sanitized.

This shows how arrogant and elitist she really is. And to think the tax payers are paying for this dribble.

Why don't they make politicians resign their positions before they start campaigning and running their mouth.

Julio   March 11th, 2008 6:19 am ET

She's pure evil.

Carrie Pa   March 11th, 2008 6:17 am ET

No more Clintons and Bushes! Our country is better then this.

Jocee   March 11th, 2008 5:21 am ET

Anyone who thinks Hillary is trying to unite the party has just been taken advantage of by the Clinton monster. You people should not be allowed to vote at all, because your maturity level is the same as a 3 year old childs maturity level. It is very difficult for you guys to make rational decisions and you should get medical attention to correct your
shortcomings as adult humans.

Pat in WA State   March 11th, 2008 5:14 am ET

Have all of you Hillary supports ever checked to see who her major backers are? She has the identical top donner list as John McCain!
Get real and wake up. With Hillary you wil get the same old same old! She is claiming she has won the big states and all of the states Obama has won don't count! When did not living in New York, California or Texas mean that my vote isn't as valued!

Francis, the Netherlands   March 11th, 2008 5:10 am ET

Most of what I see here in these comments is nothing but name-calling and mud-slinging; at each other as well as at the candidates. And lots of threats: if this or that person is not the nominee, I'm voting republican. A year, even half a year ago everyone expected a *Democrat* to take over from G. Bush. But now?

On the bright side: come November you don't have to complain you lost the Presidency to Ralp Nader, spoiling it for you in Florida! You don't need him to do that any more.... you're better at it than anyone else.

And this process is held up to the rest of the World as the standard for Democracy... it makes you wanna cry!

New York expat in Santo Domingo   March 11th, 2008 5:09 am ET

why am I always being moderated when I say nothing inflamatory – what I add is a little wonkey, bigger picture perspective to add some analysis and content to the debate, rather than slinging cute barbs and obvious repeates of past blogs... I get to feeling that intelligent discourse is not particularly admired by my dear CNN moderators. What gives?

carrie   March 11th, 2008 5:04 am ET

this is really strange.i think hillary is mentally unbalanced,as well as her husband.these clitnons are delusional.she claims she won the big states,yet hse is 100 delegates behind,how pathetic.texas is a rep state,which she won because rep and illegals voted.she will never win against mccain.she should be begging obama for the vp spot,which she would never have
OBAMA ALL THE WAY

jock   March 11th, 2008 4:59 am ET

Hillary is tried and tested in over 80 countries. As the wife of a visiting US President she was entitled to and professionally negotiated her way through incalculable amounts of complimentary tea and cookies. Does this mean that by Hillary’s childlike reasoning that Laura Bush is also tried and tested to be President.

Hillary has also had numerous experiences of answering the White House phone at 3am but unfortunately the callers always said CAN I SPEAK TO YOUR HUSBAND PLEASE !!

BenInNewZealand   March 11th, 2008 4:58 am ET

Leaving aside Obama for a moment, the real problem with a Clinton candidacy is her electability. To win the election in November, the Democratic nominee will need to win the swing vote composed of independents and Republicans disenchanted with the Bush Administration. They'll need to win this vote in the usual key states such as Florida and Ohio to take the election. There has been a Republican president for 20 of the last 28 years. Bill Clinton reversed this Republican predominance by winning the swing vote and by being a charismatic candidate who could pull in this vital demographic. Unfortunately for him and his wife, Hillary lacks both the charisma and the support of those outside the democratic faithful. Worse than this, there are many who are actively anti-Clinton and would happily work to derail her campaign.

Due to this and despite his inexperience, Obama is the only viable option for the democrats if they intend to win the White House.

Gene Edochie   March 11th, 2008 4:48 am ET

Joint ticket indeed.
if Obama was so in experienced why then does Hilary need the partnership so badly. How could you ask Obama to be a running mate and be your number two. wat an insult!!!!
Hilary is a terrible person, very dishonest....she is simply playing politics and i wonder how come most people refuse to acknowledge this.
Obama exudes so much peace, love, calmness which were the factors that worked in favour of Bill Clinton as a president.
Everyone talks of experience but the truth is this, 'a bit of experience mixed with intelligence is what any one needs to overcome any challenge'. experience without intelligence cant get u anywhere.

OBAMA IS ARGUABLY THE BEST MAN FOR THE JOB.

food for thot   March 11th, 2008 4:48 am ET

this is getting interesting,hillary really thinks she would be the nominee by controlling the DNC,she better think again if she steals this nomination there would be blood all over the world,the world is watching, americans abroad are watching and waiting for change is coming to america so clintonistas get use to it.
OBAMA 4 LIFE!

Politra   March 11th, 2008 4:47 am ET

Hillary is very BAD in math:
She offered joint ticket ! Its a joke of the year !
For this everyone should hate her. For her self-contradiction, for her egoism and for her sense of (dis)proportion !

She is a very BAD American:
She views, Ohio=rest of USA

Media is also BAD in math:
On the 4 March, media coverage was not proportionate to the result !
Media should not view : Ohio=rest of USA , as Hillary views it.
Is it true that Hillary is the winner of Texas !!!!!!

GLORIA   March 11th, 2008 4:42 am ET

NO, SHE WILL NOT, BECAUSE THE CLINTON 'S ARE WITH THE DIRTY TACTICES, I AM A INDEPENTEND WHO WAS LOOKING FORWARD TO VOTE FOR OBAMA BUT AFTER ALL OF THIS NASTY ATTACK ON BARAK I THINK THAT THE CLINTON CAMP WILL TEAR THE PARTY APART, AND AM LOOKING AT RON PAUL AND IF AM THINKING THIS WAY OTHERS ARE TOO.

DP   March 11th, 2008 4:39 am ET

NO–Hillary doesn't benefit from this. She looks ridiculous. Just like she looks ridiculous when she says she WON Michigan. She was the only Democrat on the ballot. lol Does she think she is playing solitaire?? Well..she might. She seems to think this is all about her.
She lies to the people who want to trust her and then trust her, like leading sheep to the slaughter. She will slaughter their hopes and dreams of a woman as President. She will dishonor the trust Americans put into this Office of President. NOTE: Hillary and Bill Clinton have the experience of dishonoring Americans, the American Presidency and the White House. And let's not forget, our economy!
Where are our jobs? Oh, yes, Bill signed NAFTA and Hillary thought it was good. Greed begets Greed. Since more of us are poorer, let's unite and win the Obama Nomination and Make a Real Statement.

john   March 11th, 2008 4:34 am ET

This seems to be an attempt to sabotage a Democratic victory in November so that Hillary can come back and try again in 4 years without Obama as President.

JRec, PA, Independent   March 11th, 2008 4:33 am ET

Sen. Clinton is better off without Obama in her quest to be the 1st Female President of the United States. Why would Hillary wants a VP who is proven to be a plagriarist, someone we can't trust to answer the 3 a.m. phone call and unpatriotic. John Edwards is far better off candidate for VP and a respected Statesman.

Joe   March 11th, 2008 4:24 am ET

Give me a break! The entire DNC is doing nothing but what they do best...create nothing but chaos and then blame others for it. These two (Obama/Clinton) are exactly the same. They are fighting like second graders to see who is going to be first in line...NEITHER of the two have what it takes to lead this country. Anyone who leads this country today will be unpopular because hard decisions have to be made and these two want to be 'liked'....and the boss just isn't 'liked'. Is he?

King   March 11th, 2008 4:17 am ET

My sugestions are very simple and the best , Hillary call off your campaign and wait . After the convention, then discutions will start as to who will be the VP. As for decception they say you can deccive all the people one time but for ever you can`t. Hillary it`s over. Try again the next eight yaers. God bless your efforts. Amen

Jarone Johnson   March 11th, 2008 4:13 am ET

Hillary's offering of the VP position to Obama could have been successful, but her recent shake up in her national campaign office didn't get the timing right. The Clintons are professional politicians and the crying episodes, the "they're ganging up on me", the 'Obama Picture", the Chicago Developer connection, and the Hilarious SNL Hillary, all were calculated timely maneuvers. Her latest attempt will backfire because it got out too early and gave her constituency too much time to think about how ridiculous her vp offer was. She probably figured that the folks in Mississippi would take a little bit longer to piece everything together, but she forgot that the Mississippi schools are now competitive with the California schools and the kids there are now able to help their grandparents, (Hillary's biggest supporting group in Mississippi), figure out what is right and what is wrong!

ladlaw   March 11th, 2008 4:13 am ET

The dream ticket started with reporters asking questions about weather or not it would happen. Clinton has effectively addressed this issue. I think Obama used bad judgment when he denounced the possibility of being on a ticket with Hillary. I believe he played right into her hands. I believe that when pressure is put on them for the sake of the party to join tickets- she will have a defense – he refused. If he had said, "sure, but I'll be on top" he would have prevented alienating the party or offending the Clintons. Hillary is not going away. If she does not get the presidency, she will still be involved in capitol hill – she will have the power to help him or hurt him. Life says/experience says, "Don't burn your bridges!" it obvious Obama hasn't learned that lesson yet!

MahoganyShotgun   March 11th, 2008 4:05 am ET

hmmmmm, who would be crazy enough to take a VP slot with Hillary. Just imagine...

President Hillary
President Bill

...Vice President (Anybody)

The Vice Presidency would be at best ....a joke.

ObamaforPres08   March 11th, 2008 4:02 am ET

It's so unfortunate that Hillary speaks of change but is still interested in engaging in the same deceptive practices. Hypothetically, let's say they did run on the same ticket with her in the No. 1 spot. If she did win the presidency and something were to happen to her on "Day One" the Vice President would have to step in. How can she say on one hand, that Obama is not ready to be Commander in Chief on Day one but say he'd make a fine Vice President on the other? If he's good enough to run for Vice President, then he's good enough for President...the person in that No. 2 slot HAS to be!

But we don't have to talk about hypotheticals here because he's in the lead, he's going to win the nomination and he's not bringing her along on the ticket!

OBAMA '08

ABC = Anybody But Clinton   March 11th, 2008 4:01 am ET

ew.......something stinks in here.....oh Hillary's at it again..........

Think for a moment   March 11th, 2008 3:58 am ET

I find it funny to read these posts. First there are the unwaivering supporters of one of the candidates. Then the statement how the other is a joke. Over and over again. Post after post. This is going to be the reason why the Democratic Party could lose in November. Boil it down and you find that both candidates are generally after the same thing. Different approaches maybe. It was brought up the age issue. Kennedy had the same thing said about him. I do not have the transcripts, but Lincoln was most likely hounded on the issue. But perhaps that is what we need. McCain is in his 70's. Hillary will have just turned 61. Thinking about it, who do they really represent. The youth of America, or the aging? Maybe that is why Obama is having an easier time connecting with the younger generations. .... As for the delegates from Florida and Michigan. We keep hearing how Hillary won those states. Ok – Floridians may not have all voted. Obama was not even on the ballot in Michigan, because he withdrew when they were going ahead with the early vote. No matter what happens, it is not going to please the other. Split the delegates, re-vote or leave them out. You have to remember why we use delegates. In the forming decades, it was not possible to have everyone cast ballots in a timely basis. So you vote, and your delegate goes and eases the process on election day. The U.S. has too large a population to handle that now. We have enough to go to a popular vote. The margins may be closer, the results are the same. The 2k election showed that. Enough ranting people. Go read a book, better yet, read a book to a child or an elderly person. As a final thought/laugh – How many times are we going to let Florida screw up an election before we finally finish the wall cutting them off from the rest of the country?

NEVERCLINTONS   March 11th, 2008 3:57 am ET

Hillary says Obama is all about speech but check this out; what exactly did she do in China...delivered a speech of course: what did she do in Kosovo and Ireland...also delivered speeches. Now she tries to take credit for everything.
Is there any real treaty or policy that came into effect or being as a direct consequence of Hillary's speeches? I dare say none whatsoever...so what foriegn experience does she precisely have then besides having tea with international dignitories as a first lady?
Of course, she needs Obama on that ticket more than Obama could ever need her for anything. But most importantly, the whole world is watching and the Democratic party must not only do justice in this primaries, but MUST ALSO BE SEEN to do justice and fair play in the process, or else she is doomed. Hillary is only doing the Democratic party a severe disservice by her methods.
Let Hillary preach to the Pennsylvania, Michigan and Florida Voters about joint ticket with Obama. Trust me, she will never do this in those states.

Randy   March 11th, 2008 3:52 am ET

Mc Lame, uh Mc Same as Bush and McCain!

MikeinOhio   March 11th, 2008 3:47 am ET

I hope the people in Mississippi who are voting today are not dumb enough to fall for this new Clinton ploy. They only want votes so she can say she won the popular vote. They do not care one bit about Obama. I can just see what role he would play in a Clinton/Obama administration–NONE! It would be Billary, Billary, Billary. Obama would be made out to be a POS. Don't fall for it voters.

rusty   March 11th, 2008 3:47 am ET

The Clinton's are delusional, manipulative, and dishonest. Their campaign has been a disaster, and it is now beginning to hurt the Democratic party, and its chances in the general election. They represent old politics, and the whole world is seeing how superficial it is. Obama is right in denouncing, and rejecting this new tactic of theirs. Seeing all of the different tacts the Clinton's have taken in these past few weeks, it amazes me that there are still people out there who would prefer those two back in the White House.

Epluribusunum   March 11th, 2008 3:43 am ET

For it to work, a "dream team" has to be mutually compatible. Are Obama and Clinton compatible at the core level?

One summons our better angels by articulating an audacious vision that we can be the change that we aspire to. - Yes, we can! The other derides and despises "the vision thing", and appeals to people's baser instincts through Rovian electoral dirty tricks.

One wisely and presciently warned Congress and the nation against the folly of the Iraq misadventure. The other cynically triangulates for personal political gains by blithely subscribing to not ONE, but TWO war authorizations!

Richard Nixon and Spiro Agnew were a compatible team. So are Bush and Cheney. Contrariwise, FDR and Truman were a positive compatible team. But JFK and LBJ were a tragic mismatch, on a personal and national level.

At the core level, Obama and Hillary Clinton appear to have nothing in common. How can they be "a dream team", other than just for the sake of getting more votes in November 2008?

NEVERCLINTONS   March 11th, 2008 3:42 am ET

Obama is fending off attacks from Hillary, Bill, Chelsea and the Republicans and yet he has come thus far.
Notice that Hillary is yet to return any monies gotten from any of her contributors of questionable character, unlike Obama...and there are indeed too many of them.
Hillary herself did confess in their debate in Texas that it was an honor for her to be in the presence of Obama so why should Obama now play second fiddle to her? Why didn't she talk about the joint ticket in Ohio and Texas? She has been campaiging already in Pennsylvania, but she will not mention the joint ticket gimmick there because it is not to her advantage.
The name Clinton is synonymous with scandal...there seem to always be some kinda scandal about them wherever they go and Obama does not need that in his political life...may be that is the experience Hillary means that Obama doesn't have.
Right now, too many wars have been fought and the world is uneasy too: The one true person or personality the world doesn't need right now is Hillary as we are all witnesses to her antics and ethics in this campaign. She could never unite anybody and always after her own personal interests no matter who gets hurt in the process.

Brenda Waters   March 11th, 2008 3:41 am ET

Apart of the condescending arrogance of Senator Clinton, it shows her total LACK OF JUDGEMENT AND EXPERIENCE – a VP is also supposed to be 'ready-on-day one', should something happen to the President. Senator Obama would never make the reverse'coalition'- he has better judgement and grasp of the position of President – not for his personal ego and ambition – but what is best for his country and the Democratic Party.

BIG DIFFERENCE – your choice America – you don't have room to make another mistake – the now expanding world is seriously questioning your credibility. This time your choice must reflect
CHANGE, if you are to regain your status on the World Stage.

Brenda Elizabeth Cowley-Waters
Paris/London/Dublin/EU

Jenan   March 11th, 2008 3:41 am ET

Thankyou Obama for your Clarity on this matter. Obama made it very clear as to his position on this notion that has been floated about by the Clinton Campaign. One only has to look a t how she has run her campaign, to know , " She is not about Change" , in Washington. The idea of a joint ticket , regardless of the nominee, is impossible. She does not have the values or character of Obama, C'mon folks , Who would want to be a VP attached to Billary , I can't imagine anyone wanting to accept that ticket, it would be political suicide.

signed ..A Canadian supporting Obama '08

Lynne   March 11th, 2008 3:38 am ET

OBAMA tells the TRUTH! All he has to do is to continue to tell the truth and take the high ground and ONLY RESPOND TO THEIR LIES by TELLING THE TRUTH and then MOVE ON TO WHAT HE CAN AND WILL DO as PRESIDENT of the USA.

SHE IS A MESS and I HOPE CNN continues to point out all the ways she plays SILLY games while the IMPORTANCE of OUR COUNTRY will go to the person people believe to be BEST QUALIFIED, MOST TRUSTWORTY, and HONEST.

HILLARY and BILL (the IMPEACHED team) continue to SHAME THE FACE of this COUNTRY by their actions. It is TIME for OBAMA who will, and YES WE CAN, turn this country back towards the COUNTRY WE LOVE and HONOR. GO BARACK and MICHELLE!!!!

Randy   March 11th, 2008 3:35 am ET

It's 0300am and the Red phone rings, who is going to answer it? Hillary does; "Bill it's for you"!

Norm   March 11th, 2008 3:33 am ET

I'm a registered Republican, but I haven't voted for one in eight years. My vote will go to whichever Dem gets the nod. However, for some of you to say that you won't vote if Obama is on the ticket, and others to say they won't vote if Hillary is one the ticket, is simply hypocritical. Wait, scratch that, it just plain stupid. You realize, of course, that John McCain is just G.W. Bush in sheep's clothing, don't you?

In case you haven't noticed, our country is heading downhill fast. Enough non-votes by Democrats will guarantee at least four more years of the same.

Think about it.

averagejoe   March 11th, 2008 3:26 am ET

I have to agree with Matt that bringing this VP issue out is simply brilliant for several reasons. First, by merely being open to and echoing the sentiments of a majority of democrats of the possibility of a "dream ticket", BO's true colors were exposed. He's become so arrogant now (Bush-like) that he's so blinded by his personal ambition and forgets about party unity (rk, Xyndau, rowena, and Oregon voter discussed this thoroughly). Loyal dems will find this very disturbing and will exhaust more efforts to stop him from achieving his selfish goal. Second, this issue may be viewed as a gambit which BO naively took. By dismissing the hopes of the democratic base for a "dream ticket", he voluntarily removed himself from the VP short list (good riddance!). When HC's momentum continues to grow up to the time PA, KY, IN, WV, MI, and FL vote (or re-vote), superdelegates will realize who's the clear party champion and affix their blessings to her party nomination. They will not question her decision should she pick a different VP other than BO. They will also recognize that BO's version of "playing by the rules" (i.e. disenfranchising MI and FL voters and forcing superdelegates to his side up to the point of totally disregarding their independence and political wisdom) is simply self-serving and anti-party base (thanks, Joseph of LA, CA!). Lastly, has anyone noticed the sound of desperation (even perhaps fear) from BO's camp that they're now clamoring for HC to drop out of the race? Even though they won't admit it, it's clear that time is not on their side and inevitably, HC will be nominated by the democratic majority by the time the dust has settled. It's just like selling the stocks while the market price is higher and cashing in with a higher return now; they don't expect a favorable return in the days (and weeks) ahead because they're spiraling downwards and probably mimicking the economic recession.

Nic   March 11th, 2008 3:24 am ET

BOOOOOOOOOOOOOH CLINTONS:::::::::::First your campain add with a Obama supporter at sleep.Sure she will want Obama to pick up the phone when it rings.That helped you get along in Ohoi ,Texans took their time.Now you wanna use another tactice with Obama as your VP?That grid you have for the white house please let it go.I know Chealse will one day be running for president too..This is not a your Family house.Who on this great Nation will want thier kids to be corrupt the way you and your campain board has been.Going around and deciving old minds and those who don,t have any knowledge of the things and happenings around them.
If it were you on Senator Obama,s shoes will you take his call for you as VP?Don,t forget we are still waiting for your Tax cut returns so the American people can know were your money is coming from.Pennslyvania is Obamas.You missed it all.Instead of asking for a dream ticket better take a Bus ar Train ticket to NY and help out your freind.Stop disgracing this great Nation.

Hillary   March 11th, 2008 3:23 am ET

Wayne...you said...

"Obama's arrogance is getting more than a bit annoying! First he says he won't run for president again if he doesn't win this time, now its how he won't even consider being vice president. It's he's way or no way (an attitude we've had in the White House for 8 years now already). I begin to see why so many Hillary supporters are saying they would vote for McCain rather than see this arrogant baby in control of the country."

Do you think that the emotional and physical effort it takes to run for President of the United states is akin to a walk in the park? If Obama says he will not run again, that is his prerogative. The Road to the White House is a long and arduous one...many of us could not even do it ONCE!!. And why should he consider being subject, as Vice President, to Hillary's whims after all of the criticism and insults that she has heaped on him...? I, frankly, find you arrogant for making statements based on silly suppositions, and not thinking through your statements with any clarity of judgment.

David   March 11th, 2008 3:21 am ET

This is Hillary just playing the game again, desperate to win and at any cost. Just like her stealing all the delegates in FL and MI by saying they should be reseated without a new ballot. Under no interpretation is that fair.

To those who suggest it, Bill cannot be VP. Read the constitution and ammendments 15 and 22 closely. And that's coming from a Brit who appears to know more than some of the Americans posting here!

Frances   March 11th, 2008 3:21 am ET

Obama responded like a jerk to the idea of being on the ticket with Hillary! Suppose she responded in such a manner if he considered her for V.P.! The media has coddled him so much that he feels he is entitled to special treatment and that he is the heir apparent to the presidency of this country!
OBAMA THE UNREADY! UNREADY FOR PRESIDENT. UNREADY FOR V.P.
GO HILLARY!

Robert M. Reidy N.Y.   March 11th, 2008 3:21 am ET

What egotistical arrogant self aggrandizing crap !!!

Just how stupid do these Clinton's think we are ?

This deceitful, completely disingenuous political ploy points up
the kind of old worn out politics that we the people are down right sick to
death of.

Out with the old and in with the NEW !

VOTE OBAMA
VOTE OBAMA
VOTE OBAMA

Gerard van Beusekom-Fretz   March 11th, 2008 3:20 am ET

If you really want someone with experience. One that even is willing to knock at YOUR door at 3 a.m. Well I know someone in Havana who desperately needs a new job.
However if you bother about the quality of one's experience...

Barb Townsend   March 11th, 2008 3:20 am ET

BTW if Senator Clinton wins through hoodwinkery and chicanery in FL TX and MI then I will be a McCainocrat just for the pure cussedness of it.

With Obama i am votong for something. Don't take away that dream from millions of people through trickery and lies. Don't do that.

JH   March 11th, 2008 3:15 am ET

billary is great lier family in AMERICAN HISTORY watch movie "PRIMARY COLOR " make u puke

Billy   March 11th, 2008 3:11 am ET

I feel so sorry for Bill clinton,it must be a real nightmare to be married to this women.

david   March 11th, 2008 3:11 am ET

Hillary is shameless playing for a tie, now that there is no way of her securing the nomination through primary voting. does she think she can persuade Obama supporters to stay home and let her steal thing thing with the promise that he'll be on the ticket? has she realized that he brings new voters into the Democratic fold in the general election, voters she cannot herself attract? is she willing to drag the party through a damaging convention deadlock to force obama to put her on the ticket as his running mate, which he would otherwise have no incentive to do? all of this speaks very poorly of her.

Anvar   March 11th, 2008 3:10 am ET

Probably, Clinotons palnned this proposal before campaign started and now they forgot that they are not front-runners!!!

Barb Townsend   March 11th, 2008 3:10 am ET

Perhaps I am judging Senator Clinton too harshly but everything she has done lately in the way of an attack really rubs me the wrong way.
Senator Obama is ahead in the race and yet she is promoting the idea of him being her VP -which may have scored her a few points for appearing to be the front runner. Positioning.

There is a backlash to this kind of behavior though.

Jane   March 11th, 2008 3:09 am ET

Wow, Hillary is really desperate. She is going to get creamed on Tuesday in Mississippi by double digits, and I am eager to see it happen.

It's time for a change for the country.

Obama '08

Craven   March 11th, 2008 3:09 am ET

The thought of either one of the Democratic nominees becoming president makes me cringe, but for the Republicans it's a win-win situation.

JDB   March 11th, 2008 3:06 am ET

As every survery has shown, Obama carries a general election at higher percentages than Clinton – both in Electoral College math and in Popular Vote. Seriously, what good is a Clinton candidacy if she can only carry the "blue" states – and not even carry the states that Kerry did? Nobody divides like a Clinton.

bobby   March 11th, 2008 3:05 am ET

New York,do us all a favor and take her back,she worthless

paycheck   March 11th, 2008 3:02 am ET

Keep it going obama,keep throwing mud on her face,ive had it with that witch

Danny P, Bangkok, Thailand   March 11th, 2008 3:02 am ET

It's like, "Since I'm losing, why don't you be VP so I can be President?" What a bright idea! But only if you were having a 1st grade conversation in the playground at recess. Hill didn't have the experience to take care of Bill when he was the president, what makes you think she can take care of America, or the rest of the world for that matter.

Every president learns in office–unless they' took "US President 101" in college. The major difference is that some presidents learn fast while others come to the end of their term without getting it!

Robin Wagner from ct   March 11th, 2008 3:01 am ET

Hillary Clinton , Just up to her same old same old. Tricks and depictions . Trying to make it out that she is in the lead . Her so called BIG states has been blue anyways , Barack Obama is right to stand up to this point . He has a lead in delegates and also won more states 29 out of 40 mean Hillary only won 11 . And he also has the poplar vote. And won 12 in a row . She been saying all along he has no experience .
But yet he can be her VP.? huh . first of all the number 2 is telling American people whom can be her running mate. If that was not bad enough the person she said had no experience . HUH ....
So ask your self as voter . Why is it she been lieing and playing these dirty tricks. And why is it she more BUSH like than McCain. We already have this in Whitehouse already.
Lies and Bully and hide thing from American people . And using fear to get what they want . In the end you'll be asking yourself like you do now with Bush why did I vote for him. Same with Hillary . WHY did I vote for her ,
AND BILL .?

bobbynoodle   March 11th, 2008 3:00 am ET

Very glad to see obam sling some mud in her face,Ive had it with her and her tactics

Yves larochelle   March 11th, 2008 2:55 am ET

It is pure RACISM in my opinion. They think that it's not normal for America to have Obama as a President because he is not a member of the traditional select clan. Bill is also seeking a third mandate and Hillary thinks it is God given that she will be President.
Would it be possible to buy the nomination, some would be attempted to offer more than a VP role.

bobbynoodle   March 11th, 2008 2:49 am ET

take her back,new york,please,you cant do better then this

bobbynoodle   March 11th, 2008 2:46 am ET

Rodhams just lost another super deligate in her freind Eloit spitzer HA HA HA HA HA

Vote Obama   March 11th, 2008 2:38 am ET

I think that Hillary Clinton is desperate for votes, and she's trying to get voters attention on Obama being her VP to try to change voters mind about Obama and the changes he's trying to bring to this country, which it is not going to work. The politics that Hillary is talking about, are suggestions her husband made in 1990s. Times have changed, so we need that same change in the white house. OBAMA DOES NOT NEED HILLARY AS HIS VP, because she doesn't stand for change.

I knew that something was going to go wrong during the primary, so I decided that if Hillary win the nomination, I will never vote again. What happened in FL and MI is a disgrace of what is to come of this voting procces now and in the furture , and the media doesn't make anything different than what was done in those two states. You took Hillary Clinton out the spot light, and decided to put everything negative about Obama on, trying to discredit his name, so in a-way you have been a little bias.

WE WANT NEW, AND WE WANT CHANGE!!!
DO THE RIGHT THING!!!

VOTE FOR BARACK OBAMA

Mike in Oahu   March 11th, 2008 2:37 am ET

Opportunistic, caniving, forked tongue, shrewd...

The Clintons will do anything and stoop to whatever tactics they can in order to get what they want. Before they start offering "dream tickets" there needs to be a "reality check"! Who in their right minds would want to work for (or with) that shrew. She's got more balls than spalding.

If the Dems go for Hillary then I'm going for McCain.

Richard   March 11th, 2008 2:34 am ET

Obama is leading in every statistical category that is important, even with a revote in FL and MI Clinton will not be able to catch up. Unless a miracle saves clintons campaign the only way she will become the Democratic nominee is through overriding the popular vote. With that said I don't see a debate but people vested in a candidate willing to chop down the opponent to try and find a reason a avenue for her to become nominated. Regardless of your beliefs please believe in democracy.

Hillaryisajoke   March 11th, 2008 2:34 am ET

Well, a least with Elliot Spitzer proving that he is among the highest order of hypocrites who claim to support the rights of women while actually trampling on them, Bill and Hillary have someone who they can commiserate with. Billary + Spitzer = the worst thing to happen to women in 100 years yet Tina Fey thinks they represent a new feminist ideology. Behold the power of delusion on the far left.

hjohnconroe   March 11th, 2008 2:33 am ET

Clinton is a joke,a tottal jerk

Judith   March 11th, 2008 2:31 am ET

America the Beautiful, maybe you were sleeping but it was, Hillary's campaign mamnaging skills the made her run out of money and have to loan her campaign 5 million bucks, NOT OBAMA'S campaign....

The worse thing Obama could do is share a ticket with Hillary Clinton...Thank God he set the record straight.... And he is ahead in all ways above hillary, she should drop out not him...
I would love to see an Obama/ Edwards ticket

GO OBAMA

john   March 11th, 2008 2:30 am ET

Also, I find it just a bit repulsive that all of these clinton supporters are in essence telling Obama to get to the back of the bus and wait his turn.

Peter   March 11th, 2008 2:30 am ET

Buying donuts for Hillary's campaign staff: $125,000

Hillary loaned her campaign: $5,000,000

Hillary's fear mongering 3am ad: $2,000,000

Splitting the FL and MI delegates evenly between the two candidates: Priceless

shannon   March 11th, 2008 2:30 am ET

to anybody who thinks that hillary is tying to unite the party is truly mistaken.. U cant see through this? If she wants a dream ticket so bad,she should a least accept the vice president position. but no it will only work if she is on top of the ticket.. ha ha ha that is funny. Notice how most of her voters aren't the most educated.. I said most not all.....

The Voice of Reason   March 11th, 2008 2:30 am ET

Obama '08 President of the United States of America

Clinton '10 Governor of New York

Thats the only way she can run anything besides Bill.

FELLOW AMERICAN   March 11th, 2008 2:26 am ET

OBAMA should reject and denounce BILLARY's offer.

OBAMA 08!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Thomas   March 11th, 2008 2:24 am ET

Those of you democrats with constant evil personal attacks should be ashamed. You represent all that is wrong with this country.

fm   March 11th, 2008 2:23 am ET

and what experience did bush ii have

The_Commentator   March 11th, 2008 2:23 am ET

Any ticket with Hillary's name on it will simply mean another Republican in the White House. Hillary and Bill are completely delusional. This is just another strategy to play to the black vote in Mississippi...hoping that African Americans will embrace Hillary because she's offering (maybe) Obama a seat at the table. This strategy will backfire.

Pauli   March 11th, 2008 2:22 am ET

deb

u may be gud @ grammer, but u cant count. 2008 and 2016? wut happind too 2012?

I'm no Democrat, and from all the ranting I see here, I PRAY this kills the Democratic Party; Heaven help us if we ever elect another Democratic president....

John Adkisson   March 11th, 2008 2:22 am ET

Her comments about Obama joining HER ticket prove two things: (1) she believes she is losing; and (2) she is correct!

CAM   March 11th, 2008 2:19 am ET

I would like to know how you dems think that hillary has any
experience to run the country???
she is still a junior senator. and being an ex-presidents wife is not
qulification for the job!
independent in id.

jean claude   March 11th, 2008 2:18 am ET

Clinton is trying to fool voters into believing that a vote for her is also a vote for Obama. I wonder how many people will believe that one......... Should be obvious it's a trick. That'll turn off people for sure. People don't like being tricked, makes them feel stupid. Way to go Hillary, make the voters feel that you think they are stupid. It just doesn't stop with these Clintons does it. I predict Miss. will go 70/30 for Obama. I wish the Clintons would just disappear-go back to Arkansa or Harlem or wherever.

john   March 11th, 2008 2:18 am ET

Somebody ought to ask Al Gore if he benefited from seasoning under the Clintons. She's #1 in Gall though, you know the unmitigated kind.

Dom Ferroni   March 11th, 2008 2:16 am ET

Who are we kidding? We all know Bill will be her VP! lol

fm   March 11th, 2008 2:15 am ET

lets say if obama was nominated would he be able to name bill clinton vice-president and if so lets say obama for whatever reason if elected president god forbid something happens to him would bill clinton become president.

PJW   March 11th, 2008 2:14 am ET

Politics at their worst brought to you by those who do it best....

Thomas   March 11th, 2008 2:08 am ET

How about an Obama/Romney ticket? Perhaps we could actually get politicians in Washington to get something done if they weren't so caught up in partisanship. Obviously it will never happen but what a concept of having our politicians working together for the common good rather than to satisfy the political aspirations of their party.

Well stated Earl. Hillary, thanks for playing and goodbye . . . hopefully forever.

mary   March 11th, 2008 2:06 am ET

NO, HILLARY DOES NOT NEED A LOSER---
LETS GO HILLARY!!!!!!

deroy   March 11th, 2008 2:04 am ET

this is as arrogant as the clintons can get.
they are in second place and want to put obama in his place.

this is directly from bill clinton. the nasty man.

NinaPolen   March 11th, 2008 2:02 am ET

I am absolutely stunned by the depths of manipulation, underhandedness, and just plain filth which Hillary Clinton is bringing to her campaign. It is repulsive to me and I would rather vote for McCain that put someone of that moral fiber in office. Barrack Obama, by contrast, is brilliant and is basing his campaign on what he really believes in. The fact that he is crystal clear on his beliefs and ethics while keeping policy minutiae fluid enough to work with other good minds shows that he is a natural-born leader with the intelligence and respect to listen to others with respect to trivial details. His fundamental character outshines any degree of "experience" which, frankly, Hillary has much less of that she blabbers on about.

Stan Clemons   March 11th, 2008 2:01 am ET

Not only should Barack Obama ridicule the notion, he should outright denounce and reject the idea and state that he will neither seek nor accept such an offer. The whole idea reeks of racism and is potentially destructive to the party. Also, what is her opinion of the readiness of New York's blind Lt. Governor to step into the job on day one when Spitzer Resigns.

Martin in PA   March 11th, 2008 2:01 am ET

I'm rather amused that certain Hillary Clinton supporters (NOBAMA and America the Beautiful) show up multiple times in this comment section, while some of us can never make it onto the comments.

Are the positive comments about Hillary so sparse that CNN is trying to "pad" the section with several posts by the same people??

"Get Real" CNN – OBAMA '08!

Hillary For President!!!!!! Ohio   March 11th, 2008 1:59 am ET

>>> Hillary 08<<<

anonymous   March 11th, 2008 1:58 am ET

I don't mean to be rude, but when Senator Obama starts reacting like this–first he says that he lost three states because of all of the attention that Hillary was getting since SNL, and now he screams that he will not be a VP candidate. These kinds of reactions are from a 5 year old kid. This week's SNL showed the 3:00a.m. phone call ad, and sort of replay of Senator Obama in the White House and Hillary helping him out because he doesn't have enough experience. It was funny, but like they say "every joke has an element of truth in it". When the Clinton campaign says that Senator Obama is not ready to be a President, but is ready to be a VP, you don't have to scream: "What do they want to say?" I think we all know that with these kinds of reactions Senator Obama will NOT beat McCain in the fall. "Commander-in-chief test" simply implies that Senator Obama doesn't know very well the ins and outs of how Washington works and how to work with other people there. You can't just go in and say "I am different, and I will make change"; in order to do that you have to learn to work with people from both parties, and not forget that these people are much more knowledgeable and will push on you to do what they think is right. You need to know how to work around it, and how to get what you think is right. President Bush doesn't really want to work with anybody and that's why we are in so much trouble right now as a country. Senator Obama, please take a VP position at least for the next 4 years, and then you'll be able to really talk to these people and really "MAKE CHANGE". A recent article pointed out that Senator Obama started asking other people to help him learn how to do things once he arrived into the Senate, well here as a President you won't have a whole lot of people to ask how to work with Congress. You need to be the leader and to know what to tell people. If you listen to your daughters and follow their advice on what to do, then you probably won't get very far. Obama people, please help make the change. Don't obandon Senator Obama, but help him learn from Hillary how to make real changes. Congratulations that you are in the lead, but when people tell you to do something do it instead of being stubborn. Stubborness doesn't help anybody and it doesn't get people very far. HILLARY '08, Obama-VP (no hurt feelings)

Rick   March 11th, 2008 1:58 am ET

To everyone who says Obama is going to win because he is ahead is wrong. Neither can win at this point because there are simply not enough delegates left without Florida and Michigan. It therefore doesn't matter who is ahead, it's going to be up to the DMC and Superdelegates.

Presidential qualifications does not = Vice-President qualifications. If you think Hillary is saying two opposing things by saying he would make a good VP but a bad President, you are wrong. VP would be great for him to gain the experience he needs to handle everything that he is currently extremely weak in (such as international relations).

I don't think this is just about her wanting to win either. Yes of course she wants to win. After putting all the time and effort into it thus far, wouldn't you want to win too? Yes, she wants to win, but she is also trying to unite the Democratic Party. The Republicans already have a nominee, we need one asap. While I think a Clinton/Edwards ticket would be better than a Clinton/Obama ticket, I think either would be an incredible force against the republicans. They would be unstoppable. The people loves Obama because he speaks to people's hearts, but Clinton is great because she can actually get things done and knows how. There would be no learning curve like there would be if Obama went in with someone else. And this way, he would gain the experience he needs to be an amazing president later on.

Don't get me wrong, Obama would be a great president. But I think he would be even better in another 8 years.

troy   March 11th, 2008 1:58 am ET

well the truth is that Hillary has to understand that she and Bill are saying that Obama is not good enough to be president but that he is good enough to be her vice,

somehow I had this foolish notion that the vice president had to be ready at all times to be the president, but you see, because she will try anything to get the votes of the people, she will say anything, no matter how dumb it sounds,

not to mention the racial overtones that it implies. He is good enough to be second but not first. if she has not notice she is behind. Hillary you should pretent that it is day one, pratice saying, Mr. President Obama, again, again, now that was not so bad, good girl.

Democrat for McCain   March 11th, 2008 1:56 am ET

NObama. I am voting for McCain. An Occidental College graduate will never be my President.

Crystal in CA   March 11th, 2008 1:55 am ET

Obama doesn't want no part of Billary and their gaggle of scandals. He knows that there will be more scandals involving the Clintons because they are too secretive about things.

Hillary is a piece of work. She is definitely in her own world...delusional as they come.

Bill   March 11th, 2008 1:55 am ET

"If we really don't want change, and prefer four more years of the
same, then our choices are Mrs. Bill Clinton or John McCain.

Women's History Month   March 11th, 2008 1:52 am ET

NO TKO's Obama as Michigan and Florida will be counted and you got trouble as you can't carry the "Big Delegate States and I for one have had no one tell me what is exactly your problem there but obviously with Rezo's trail things could get really bad fast for you if its your home state Republicans with the plan Right?
HillaryClinton.com Volunteer to win the remaing states starting with Mississippi tomoroow Make those Calls Guys and Girls Your Future Depends on It....Give Hillary your time just go to her website and events and call call call Mississippi then its on to Pennsylvania Go Hillary Go!!!Come Let's Make History Girly Style for our celbrating Month of Women's History We are writing the Book right Now this Moment and Travel to see the History in the Makin

blindman   March 11th, 2008 1:52 am ET

Terry March 10 6:14 pm. Obama has no say so about Fl. or Mi. it is the
D.N.C. that will not set the delegates of those states to imply that Obama has the last say about it is really funny. But I hope there is a re-vote so that those delegates will be given to the right canidates in the right way and not the way someone like u thinks they should be given
out. Remeber that Clinton was the only canidate that didnt take her name off the ballet like the other people did. Lets even the playing field and after a re-vote if she wins those states then more power to her. But let it be fair.

d.n.c

FrankSmith   March 11th, 2008 1:50 am ET

Those with (a) a brain bigger than a bird, and (b) are learned, can allow the facts (the real numbers) to stand. Given that hard numbers do not lie, here are the facts:

Pledged delegates: Obama = 1,347; Hillary = 1,200 (+147 for Obama)

SuperDelegates: Obama = 206 (up from a low 90); Hillary = 238 (down from a high 250). Net gain for Obama, deficit for Hillary

Total numbers: Obama = 1,553; Hillary = 1,438 (+115 for Obama)

Texas Caucus (still counting) Obama = 23,918; Hillary = 18,620 (+5,298 for Obama). This will give more delegates to Obama, showing that he won Texas!

So, even if Hillary wins PA, MI, FL, and the rest of the remaining states (let us grant her this) there is NO way she can overcome the deficits to Obama.

Major reason: Regardless of her wins, delegates are given "proportionally." So, people need to deal with these numbers and chill it for goodness sake!!! Hillary is out of a place to go or hide; the remaining superdelegates know these numbers and they are giving Hillary plenty of tome to "hang herself!!!

shaun   March 11th, 2008 1:47 am ET

There's no way in hell I'd ever vote for hillary. She is the very reason why obama's campaign is geared towards change and unity, and to all those who've been blinded by the true character of this beast I'd like to say wake up. It's this kind of blatent deception that's riddled this country for 8 long years, and to think that there's still some americans who fall for it is a discredit to everyone else who see's the light. You people make us look bad to the world and if it doesn't stop, america will be in twice the trouble we're in now.

Trang, Fremont, CA   March 11th, 2008 1:45 am ET

Obama would help Clinton on the ticket, but Hillary would be a liability on the ticket.

They might have similar stand on issues, but their character is different.

John White, Texas   March 11th, 2008 1:44 am ET

Sen. Clinton is using a low down and dirty tactic to gain an advantage in this race. She will not win because she is just not good for this country and for the Democratic Party.

barack08   March 11th, 2008 1:41 am ET

question,
Is obama competing with Bill and Hilary Clinton, I thought there was not a third term for any American President. when did the constitution change? This is the kind of dictatorship America as the LAST HOPE should not accept. 16 yrs of Clinton as president would be boring and full of sex scandals. I am also hearing that Bill and Eliot are peers often meeting and going out for Darts.

Californiajon   March 11th, 2008 1:39 am ET

This behavior clearly demonstrates the total lack of character in Hillary Clinton. She clearly lacks any scruples, decency, or sense of fair play. It is precisely this kind of behavior that has made our country hated by others around the globe. Barack Obama is a brilliant man who can lead this country well into the 21st century. He shows the morals and decency that would make us hold our head high in the world community. No president is capable on day one – but he will certainly be the quickest to learn in decades!

Rod   March 11th, 2008 1:38 am ET

Senator Barack Obama has won twice as many contests, leads in delegate count, and holds a lead in popular vote.
Clearly we can win without Hillary.

nikki   March 11th, 2008 1:36 am ET

I do think the Democratic party needs to be united come November. We can not afford another 4-8 years of Bush/McCain. Remember everyone thought Dubya was going to be a one-term President, and look what happened?

I don't like the idea of an Obama/Clinton and I don't like the idea of a Clinton/Obama ticket. There are too many other choices that could unify the party better!

Personally I think Obama would do well to ask Edwards to be his running mate. Richardson or Biden would also be good choices I am an Houstonian, so I also think the Mayor of Houston would be a good running mate. Mayor White showed remarkable leadership and humanity after Hurricane Katrina! Or Mayor Villagrosa from Los Angeles would be a great choice too! I am not impressed with the way Clinton has ran her campaign, but make no mistake I will vote for her over Bush-McCain any day of the week. The stakes are simply too high not to vote for whomever is on the Democratic ticket!

Franklin   March 11th, 2008 1:35 am ET

Need a cure for all this Billary/Obama nonesense? Vote McCain.

Michael Guinn Ventura, CA   March 11th, 2008 1:34 am ET

Dear "Solutions"– Hillary is the one who has caused all this DIVISION in the Democratic Party! Barack Obama is the FRONT RUNNER and all you Clinton Cling-ons need to learn to count or play a little nicer! We're supposed to be on the same team- But the most polarizing woman in politics won't stop with her Karl Rove tactics and you people just go on and on about Barack not be worthy to even be on the ticket with her--ONCE AGAIN–OBAMA HAS THE LEAD!
And no- I'm not in college- just a college graduate. I've been a Democrat for over 40 years and this whole thing has become sickening to many of us.

Lynn, Lake City, Michigan   March 11th, 2008 1:33 am ET

Obama-Clinton or Clinton – Obama; I don't think either is a good combonation, there are a lot of supporters that only support one candidate or the other, I think the democrats have the general election already wrapped up not matter who wins, and once again Hillary's comment would come back to haunt her if she were the nominee. Anyone that votes for her and they think they are getting both will likely not support her when she reveals her real choice for V.P. and I would bet it is not Obama...I think bringing somone else in who has stayed outside of the bickering would be the most beneficial, I personally like the buzz about there being an Obama-Gore ticket!

Michael, North Carolina   March 11th, 2008 1:30 am ET

If Sen. Obama ends up with more pledged delegates, and popular vote, and Sen. Clinton still ends up getting the nomination, then I believe most of the supporters of Sen. Obama should vote independent, or should vote for Sen. McCain. Sen. Obama has done more to earn the nomination than she has. Sen. Obama can bring in new and younger voter's. He also has more crossover appeal by being able to turn a red state into a blue state. Sen. Clinton cannot do this. Sen. Obama is all about the furture of this nation. Sen. Clinton is about the past. SEN. CLINTON ALSO NEEDS TO RELEASE HER TAX RETURNS.

YES WE CAN
OBAMA/EDWARDS '08

Mike   March 11th, 2008 1:30 am ET

Why does it take sooo long to get anything posted here?

Are you biased, Why can't Senator Clintons supporters have a say?

Nanthu   March 11th, 2008 1:28 am ET

Gold medalist is asked to accept a Silver and give the Gold to the looser.

hahahahaa

JohnSmith   March 11th, 2008 1:27 am ET

Those with (a) a brain bigger than a bird, and (b) are learned, can allow the facts (the real numbers) to stand. Given that hard numbers do not lie, here are the facts:

Pledged delegates: Obama = 1,347; Hillary = 1,200 (+147 for Obama)

SuperDelegates: Obama = 206 (up from a low 90); Hillary = 238 (down from a high 250). Net gain for Obama, deficit for Hillary

Total numbers: Obama = 1,553; Hillary = 1,438 (+115 for Obama)

Texas Caucus (still counting) Obama = 23,918; Hillary = 18,620 (+5,298 for Obama). This will give more delegates to Obama, showing that he won Texas!

So, even if Hillary wins PA, MI, FL, and the rest of the remaining states (let us grant her this) there is NO way she can overcome the deficits to Obama.

Major reason: Regardless of her wins, delegates are given "proportionally." So, people need to deal with these numbers and chill it for goodness sake!!! Hillary is out of a place to go or hide; the remaining superdelegates know these numbers and they are giving Hillary plenty of tome to "hang herself!!!

Joseph Edgecombe   March 11th, 2008 1:27 am ET

Shirley Chisholm for President....not Vice Presidemt.

Shirley Chisholm revolutionized America and became a revolutionary woman known around the world as one of the top 10 most important women in the world which dismissed all negative notions of the potential of black America, as she constructed the foundation for a renewed and revolutionized American society.

TODAY....

Today barack obama has been accepted/adopted and popularized by white American media and society far ahead of getting any concrete facts and information of is presidential run.
American society has turned him into a pop-star (idiot) instead of a serious political candidate like Shirley Chisholm .

Hillary Clinton is a woman candidate who of course brings the potential of a woman candidate to the presidency of the USA, who naturally brings issues of black America to the presidency because of the shared black America and women’s movements together because of the Shirley Chisholm presidential Campaign era of the early-mid. 70's, where she carried the needs of everyone in the country.

bettyc, Havre de Grace, MD   March 11th, 2008 1:27 am ET

I am one of those female senior citizen Democrats that Clinton thinks she can depend on. Where the cable people and the pollsters get there numbers is beyond me. I do not know a single soul in my age group who supports her. The opposite is true. We learned long ago what is, is. We do not want a totallly corrupt, unprincipled person in the White House. Enough of the Bush Clinton musical chairs. Look what has happened to this country in the last twsenty years. If Clinton manages to steal the nomination, I will be changing my registration, and voting for McCain. I will not waste my vote on Clinton, either as president or vice president.

J. Wong   March 11th, 2008 1:27 am ET

I was glad that Obama addressed this speculation. A ticket with Hillary, in either position, means my vote goes to McCain.

Michael Guinn Ventura, CA   March 11th, 2008 1:25 am ET

This latest ploy of the Rove, I mean Wolfson... I mean Clinton campaign is being called "smart" by her supporters, "pretentious" by most of we Obama supporters, and several things by Keith Olberman of MSNBC--none of them nice. (Way to go Keith!)
Obama is AHEAD in STATES
Obama is AHEAD in DELEGATES
Obama is AHEAD in POPULAR VOTE
OBAMA IS THE FRONT RUNNER!
With 35 years of experience in politics, one would think one would KNOW that.

Lynn, Lake City, Michigan   March 11th, 2008 1:23 am ET

Clinton- Obama ticket, I doubt it would happen, Obama will not be Second on the ballot, and Hillary despite her words would not put him second. All that her "hints" are leading to is a lot of angry voters who think they are going to get both, when chances are, in the general election rolls around no matter who wins the nomination, both names will Not be on the ballot. The democratic party could lose a lot of support if there are peopl who turn their vote to Clinton actually thinking that she is going to make Obama Vice President.

Klark   March 11th, 2008 1:22 am ET

The Red telephone rings at 3am.

Ring Ring

"Hello, this is Hillary"

"This is an emergency, maam... Mr. Obama has won twice as many states as you. He's won more of the popular vote than you. He has more delegates than you. What are your instructions?

"Ok, offer Barack the number 2 position"

"Is that a good decision, maam?"

"Don't question me. I have years of illogical whitehouse experience!"

Click.

Pat Va   March 11th, 2008 1:21 am ET

Is this woman delusional or what? Who in their right mind would want to be on a ticket with the likes of her!!! Excuse me while I go take a shower...the very thought of this manipultive shrew with her diry politics makes me feel icky!!!!

Trisha, Detroit, Michigan   March 11th, 2008 1:18 am ET

Dream Ticket??? I disagree. My dream ticket would not have the last name Clinton on it. Barack Obama would be smart to drop a hint about who he is considering for V.P. though, I think it would help his experience argument, and it may get voters to see out side of the Clinton name being on the ballot at all. Depending on who Obama has in mind, It may help some of the undecided voters swing his way. For example, a ballot with BARACK OBAMA and AL GORE on it would most likley win him the nomination. I think that would be a dream ticket, and it might also satisfy some of Hillary's voters who want another 8 years of the Clinton administration...but do NOT necessarily want a Clinton.
AL Gore as a Vice President for the second time around may be the key that Barack Obama needs to seal up the nomination and win the general election.

Mike   March 11th, 2008 1:18 am ET

Why would the Obama or anybody for that matter want to engage in a menage a trois with Hillary & Bill Clinton. She's ready on day one? No wonder she's on the comedy show! She has a profound grasp of the obvious – she is a LOSER and the DNC needs OBAMA. The sooner Hillary smells the coffee, the better the DNC's chances against Senator McCain, an American Hero.
Mike

nikki   March 11th, 2008 1:18 am ET

Can anyone tell me the name of the US President that did not have to learn on the job? If you are thinking still, I will wait. The answer no one. They all had to learn on the job. That started with G. Washington on down.

People please tell me how anyone in America has ever gained experienced without getting the job that they are seeking? You get experience from actually doing the job itself. That's it, and nothing else. So that means whoever gets the vote for President in the General Election will be learning on the job, because there is no job that can prepare a person to be President, except being President. I am sick of hearing people saying Hillary has experience. If living in the White House made a person ready to be president, then we could say the driver, the cook/chef also have the experience to be President.

People research the candidates and stop letting the media spoon feed you untruths!

Dan Wouk   March 11th, 2008 1:18 am ET

All this talk about lack of experience is simple subtefuge. Who really has experience being a president until they actually are? Given the same condemnation of Obama's experience that Hilary is trying to use to her advantage, she would have disqualified Abraham Lincoln as a presidential possibility. His experience consisted of 1 term in the U.S. House of Representatives and a failed campaign for the U.S. Senate before he was made his party's nominee for President.

Character, creativity and the ability to include, rather than divide, Senator Clinton, are characteristics that some of us find far more valuable in a President than what you or John McCain seem to have to offer.

JT   March 11th, 2008 1:16 am ET

In the end Hillary will win!! Obama as VP is a bad idea.

Obama winning all these red states are meaningless in the general election because more than likely they will vote republican.

Superdelaegates knows that. The purpose of the superdelegates is to make judgement on who is the best candidate to win in the general election. If they are going to simply follow the result of the caucuses then we do not really need superdelegates.

Hillary should not select Obama as Vice President because he will be so busy explaining about his relationship with Rezko, NAFTA gate and his plan for Iraq (I think his adviser said that what his saying now as a candidate will change when he becomes a President).

Hillary will win!

Go For REAL Change   March 11th, 2008 1:14 am ET

How ironic...The red phone ad implied that Obama was not ready for the Presidium of the USA. Now the VP has to be ready in case the President is not able to fulfill his/her duty. It is total double talk on the part of the Clinton campagn to offer the the VP ticket to Obama. Well...I guess the Clinton's now feel that Obama is ready for the job.

#2 Clinton (in terms of deligates and popular votes) askes #1 Obama(in terms of deligates and popular votes) to be #2 VP. #1 replies to #2 "THANKS BUT NO THANKS" . Who the heck is Clinton's advisor!? This just sealed the fate of the Clinton campagn...ITS OVER BABY!!

Obama 08!

Mr. From Ohio   March 11th, 2008 1:13 am ET

CNN please quote Hillary Clintons own words in January stating that "the number one requirement for the VP is that on day one, he is ready to be president."..Hillary your words just finally caught up with you...Not this time Clintons!!!!

Obama 08 Change is needed

Cynthia Cooper   March 11th, 2008 1:11 am ET

Obama made a point right on target.Clinton needs Obama to be VP so that she can win General election.It shows confidence of her winning alone.NY People should do better job of electing their representative.NY Governor(Democratic) is in Prostitution Scandal, One of the state rep (Democratic) said Roger Clemens should be let go free and definitely we all know the dirt Hillary clinton brings.

Dan Wouk   March 11th, 2008 1:11 am ET

The arrogance of the Clinton campaign is mind boggling. Obama has said it best- by drawing attention to the fact that he has won more than double the states she has, has more elected delegates, more total delegates and beats her popular vote count by over 84,000 votes. And that 84,000 vote count includes the irrelevant results of the Florida and Michigan votes which present a distorted and inaccurate picture of these states with Obama not even on the Michigan ballot and many Floridians noting that they didn't vote in the primary because they knew it wouldn't count.

At one point I might have voted for Clinton had she been the real nominee but now given her nasty campaign rhetoric and tactics, I'll write in Obama if she steals this election.

go away obama !!!!!!!!!!!!!1   March 11th, 2008 1:08 am ET

obama supporters research your canidate he will not put on a flag pin look it up on you tube... He is getting Donations from islam!!! and farrante RESEARCH YOUR SO CALLED CANDATE!!!! OMG I am amazed so many of you Blindly follow someone you know nothing about!!!!!!!! are you serious? Id really Like a dem in the white house but if Obama wins over Hillary Im sorry I will not be voting for Him and I hope Hillary does not put him on her ticket if she wins....
Hillary 08!!!!!!!!!!!!

Kevin   March 11th, 2008 1:08 am ET

Every time I watch Hillary on stage, I feel this country have a hope. Every time I watch Obama on stage, I feel G.W. Bush is campaign again. G.W.Bush said he will bring Dem. and Rep. together during his campaign(Obama say the same). G.W.Bush said he will change Washington. Yes, he is (bad way). Obama think he can win the general election without Hillary's supporters, wrong!! Obama think he can win the general election without MI, FL voters, Wrong, wrong!! What's up Obama?

Go Hillary 08!!!

Robert   March 11th, 2008 1:06 am ET

Mr. Obama should be out of the picture! It should be Clinton-Edwards ticket! And will be a sure win!!!

Clinton – President
Edwards – Vice President
Obama – Motivational Speaker

LaLainKCMO   March 11th, 2008 1:05 am ET

Earl, you said it buddy!

During Bill Clinton's presidency, my father called Hillary the most polarizing person in politics. I thought that was his old-school conservative voice talking, but now I see the man is right!

But Brian Davey ... what are you talking about? Too soon? You talk like there's a time frame for these kinds of things. The only time frame is the wrong time and the RIGHT TIME.

This is definitely the RIGHT time for a change in how business/politics are done in DC. Read the chapter on politics in The Audacity of Hope, he's more ready than you think.

Yes We Can. Si Se Puede.
Obama 2008

Caryl S. Foster   March 11th, 2008 1:05 am ET

Regardless of who you support, on the topic at hand, it is hard for anyone not to admit that it was deceptive for Senator Clinton and her campaign to state that Senator Obama is not ready to be Commander-in-Chief but is ready to be VP given that the single most important criteria in the selection of a VP is that person's readiness to serve as Commander-in-Chief.

No matter how you spin it, it is a deceptive oxymoron put forth by the Clintons for the sole purpose of attempting to convince undiscerning undecided voters that a vote for Senator Clinton will also get them Senator Obama.

For all of us discerning decided voters, this is as clear as day.

So let us all just admit it, chalk one up for Senator Obama for correctly calling Senator Clinton on it, and let's move on to the next topic at hand whatever that may be.

Pon Mao   March 11th, 2008 1:04 am ET

Hillary Clinton keeps saying that she's a fighter, who is she fighting against? Is she going to start another civil war? or is she going to start wars with other countries? That's really scary.

Why can't we have peace on earth? Maybe because we have too many politicians like the Clintons?

Against the Cult   March 11th, 2008 1:02 am ET

CNN please cover the Rezko trial, Obama's name and activities have come up several times now and you are yet to point this out.

Eric Keller, Detroit, Michigan   March 11th, 2008 1:01 am ET

I think that this was a strategic move by Hillary which again shows how desperate she is. In my opinion, Hillary already has a candidate to share her ticket with IF she wins the nomination...and I can almost guarentee it is not Obama. I would even go so far as to say that she has probably had a vice president in mind long before the primary elections even began. I doubt she would end up putting him on the ticket anways, which will turn a lot of enthusiastic voters away if they vote for her thinking that they will get Obama to...Remeber not to count your chickens before they hatch. Unless my math is wrong she is in no position to be talking about making Him her Vice President!

rhy   March 11th, 2008 1:00 am ET

Hey Mississippi
Vote for Hillary!!!! if you research obama youll see he shouldnt even be in this race!!!! Please find out who it is your backing before you vote tomorrow!!!!.....I can tell you all after what i have Learned about Obama I would never ever Vote for him.. Sorry but I hope Hillary wins so we can turn things around in this country.. If you research obama youll find out why.. for starters he himself explains why he wont put on a flag pin!!! He wont say the pledge... Watch Fox News People or research Him and his wife She has a lovely paper you should read.. Please dont be stupid all i ask is you find out the truth before you vote!!! Go Hillary!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

OBSERVER   March 11th, 2008 1:00 am ET

Obama wants no part of V.P. talk, because he doesn't care about in uniting the party.
He will leave a deep scare in Presidential Campaign, like Ralph Nader did. He could get enough experience being V.P and he could build his career further with more dignity!

Ani   March 11th, 2008 1:00 am ET

I have life long been a democrat. I am a woman. I do not struggle with my choice to support Barack until you mention Clinton. The only person other than a republican that I CAN NOT vote for is Clinton. Not for Pres, Vice Pres or my cleaning lady. I have been a delegate for Obama in Nevada and will be forced to vote independent if she should appear on the same ticket as him. We have to stop the same old, good ol' boy politics that epitomizes the Clinton legacy. And that is why I would have to go against my heart and dream for our country and vote against a Clinton/Obama ticket or even Obama/Clinton. I fervently support who he is. I dream of a new day and not more of the same old Day 1 again. I support experience of judgment and not of being a showpiece, or a non-elected co-president, or whatever her experience was all about. She has proven that she is willing to do and say whatever to manipulate people who either don’t care or have time to hear what it is that she is saying. My Grandmother for a time when she was blinded by the idea of a woman as Pres, did for a minute support Hillary. However as her dream of a woman bleed into the dream of the right person, she split from the “easy” and came to her senses and now supports CHANGE!! Our family won’t vote for any Clinton… This is arrogant with a lack of respect, or more of her same.. Shame on you hillary Clinton. You’ll be shocked when America doesn’t support you, especially if you bully your way to this nomination.

HC   March 11th, 2008 1:00 am ET

Obama is lucky to just be considered for VP.

Hillary is, by far, more intelligent, more experienced, more capable, more able to deliver, much more hardworking, more qualified to be in the Oval Office, is more about substance than rhetoric, has already achieved so much more ... and the list goes on.

I will not vote an OBAMA_CLINTON ticket. (Sorry Hillary but you are by far too good to be his VP).
This is not about race or gender. This is purely about who is ready to be President. I will sooner vote McCain if there is a Obama_Clinton ticket. because Obama does not have the experience to be President and the Oval Office is not training camp.

I liken Obama's ambition to be President to someone who demands to be conferred a Bachelor's degree without doing the 4 year college.

Drew Rocker   March 11th, 2008 12:59 am ET

Hillary must have a humiliation fetish. Barack effectively belittled her over this issue and the press replayed it relenetlessly.

Iceman   March 11th, 2008 12:58 am ET

Why wont anyone state the obvious??
Hillary is telling Obama to go to the back of the bus!! I hope this blows up in her face more than Bill Clinton's remarks in S.C.

Maine-iac   March 11th, 2008 12:58 am ET

Oh come now. The dream ticket is McCain and Jeb Bush.... yikes!

barbara   March 11th, 2008 12:57 am ET

Hiliary and Obama – a Dream ticket?

It would be much wiser if a President picked someone they could be civil with.

There are some other good strong Democrats to choose from.

John - Spokane, WA   March 11th, 2008 12:57 am ET

How come CNN does not report the relationship of Obama and convicted Terrorists Reese & The Woodland Group. The Woodland Group gave Obama money to run for Senator. This story broke on Saturday but CNN hasnt touched it so far. Wont matter, words getting out anyway and they'll be left at the gate.

L. Tran, TX   March 11th, 2008 12:57 am ET

Clinton or Obama alone cannot beat McCain, especially if the democrats got mad and stay home or will vote for McCain.

With Obama on the Democratic side, if McCain can resist the fundamentalist Republicans, he will get the independents and the centric democrats.

With Clinton, the fundamentalist Republicans will vote anyway.

Who's on first...

Angie   March 11th, 2008 12:55 am ET

I guess Hillary supporters really are blind. How can you possibly think this is a "unifying" gesture? She is in 2nd place! This is not unifying, it's insulting to the frontrunner. If she had secured the nomination it would be a unifying gesture. Obama is not arrogant for speaking up on this. He should not let Hillary cast herself as the frontrunner. Secondly, who wants to play 3rd string to Bill? Look at what 3rd string did to Al Gore. I think people forget how all of the scandals from the Clinton years (and I was a Clinton supporter) contributed to the loss of the WH to Bush II. Even if Hillary were to win the nod, Obama shouldn't accept a VP spot from her. When the Clinton's sink, they take everyone down with them.

Rachel P. - CA   March 11th, 2008 12:53 am ET

Obama is strong enough on his own – and Clinton is beginning to realize that. If he's not experienced enough or McCain is a better candidate (according to her) – then why would she put him on her imaginary ticket? Oh, that's right. Because this is happening in the alternate universe where she becomes president.

Obama 08 – working with ALL Americans to get things done (not just blue states)

Tasha   March 11th, 2008 12:50 am ET

I have to be honest, the thought of another Clinton in the white house truly makes my skin crawl. I just can't get past her fake smiles, empty words and nasty-snide remarks, that make her seem like a 'fighter' to her devout followers. When I listen to her speak most of the time I'm thinking everything thats coming from her mouth is just another manipulative tactic to get what she wants, but she could honestly care less about whats really going on...and I just flat out don't trust a thing the woman says. And as cruel as that may sound I just get the most troubling feeling at the thought of her being in the white house.

I use to be a supporter of hers, but I just don't think she knows how to lead is down the path of unity...and more than anything we need someone who can pull this country together and stop the Democrat on Republican bickering.

And I think Obama is the man for the job.

AtlantaVoter   March 11th, 2008 12:47 am ET

Since Obama is winning so many of the so-called "Republican states" I wonder if Republicans are voting in the Democratic primaries there? I know it's not a new idea but it does make me wonder.

I'm sure they are just itching to get their claws into him in the General Election.

They will make his campaign against Hillary look like a walk in the park.

You Obama kiddos need to wake up. Having no problematic history because you have NO history is not necessarily a good thing. Go back and look at his very brief Senate history and you will see that his major goal has been to stay above the fray - even if meant not getting the work done that he was sent there to do.

This isn't high school. The goal is not necessarily to get the most friends. It's to get the job done.

Hillary can get the job done.
Hillary 2008

Bob   March 11th, 2008 12:47 am ET

I believe all three, Obama, Clinton, and McCain are qualified to be the president. However all three display some undesirable traits. McCain has anger management problems, and has the Republican ideology, that I fear will be the ruin of this country. Compairing Obama and Clinton, Clinton is devisive, but has more experience and better work ethic, while Obama is a silver tonged, new blooded, idea man. Personally I'd like to see, Clinton as president, Obama as vice president, Edwards as Attorney General, and McCain as Secretary of Defense. I feel Edwards is well qualified to go after all the illegal, and immoral big business's that have permeated since Bush came into power. My choice of McCain for Secretary of Defense is based on my belief, that our enemies would fear his anger and tanascity, kinda like a bull dog on a leash. I truly believe, if Clinton and Obama were on the same ticket, they would be elected by a very mandating landslide, effecting the total destruction of the republican party for many years to come, that's what would restore this country to it's rightful place in this world.

Peachy Keen   March 11th, 2008 12:46 am ET

Sadly, the Democrats are going to lose in November. If Obama loses, his supporters will vote for McCain. If Hillary loses, her supporters will vote for McCain.

Any way you look at it, McCain is the big winner in this whole Democratic mess.

Our society has evolved from people voting for a party to people voting for people.

Ron   March 11th, 2008 12:45 am ET

Dream Ticket ..NOT GOING TO HAPPEN!! Why....
Hillary has been insulting..Hillary has tried to demean Baracks successes in the smaller states....Hillary has repeatedly said Barack is not qualified to answer that 3:00am phone call...Hillary would try to steal the election with Super Delegates...Hillarys actions during the campaign are a PERFECT example of way American Politics has been the last 12 years and America is really getting tired of it. If Hillary was another male doing the same thing, she would lose about 30% of the women vote she is currently getting. Is she qualified..YES..does she have the right character..ABSOLUTELY NOT!! I want to see a woman become President, but NOT THIS ONE!!!

James M.   March 11th, 2008 12:45 am ET

I think Obama makes a great point in reminding us that HRC has said he is not good enough to be president of the US, but somehow he is good enough to be Vice President? She again loses credibility.

Obama can win both the nom and the general election without her...and he certainly will.

Obama '08

Joanna Chan   March 11th, 2008 12:41 am ET

Read carefully people. Not once does Obama flat out say he would turn down a Clinton offer for VP. All he says is that he is "not running for vice president." He or his staff chose his wording very carefully, everyone else including the media just filled in the blanks. He wouldn't dare make such a definitive statement because you know if Clinton really does win the nomination, he would accept the VP offer in a heartbeat. Otherwise, who knows what the political climate will be or where Obama's status will be in 4-8 years? Running with VP clout can't hurt. You want to see Obama in the White House for 8 years or 12-16? Think about it.

DM   March 11th, 2008 12:38 am ET

Will a Clinton clan lover please show me all of Bill's experience before running for president besides being governor in the state of Arkansas and a womanizer. It seems to me all the claims the Clinton's are making about Obama's inexperience is about the same as Bill's when he ran for president. Should we find a way to take away Bill's presidency because he was inexperienced at the time he took office. Don't you ever wonder why the Clinton's didn't move back to Arkansas after his presidency? They are all out for themselves. Don't be fooled. FOOL you once shame on them, FOOL you twice, shame on you.

jack   March 11th, 2008 12:38 am ET

how can a second place candidate start making decisions about the VP? Got to love the that scenario. Does she honestly think Obama would want to run with her. He wants to be the PRESIDENT!! and will not stop at anything less. Go Obama!

biged55   March 11th, 2008 12:38 am ET

this reminds me of the scene in "it's a wonderful life" where Jimmy Stewart is considering working for Mr. Potter, and then he realizes he cannot sacrifice his principles for a cushy job.
Obama needs to stay on the high moral ground to achieve his goal.

D   March 11th, 2008 12:37 am ET

I do not believe in Democratic party anymore. I am not angry with Hillary- she does not surprise me anymore. But I am angry with the Party. I am angry with Al Gore. Why are they even letting this happen.

SB   March 11th, 2008 12:36 am ET

You have to win to offer the VP position. It's an easy concept if you are educated!

OBAMA '08

MAP, Sr...   March 11th, 2008 12:34 am ET

MONSTER.....

Nice Try, HA HA HA HA !!!!!!

Nana   March 11th, 2008 12:34 am ET

Experience? Other than family businesses, how many corporations would hire the wife to do the husband's job? Would you invest if they did? Hillary does not have executive experience, she was a spectator.
She is shrewd and opportunistic and exactly the kind of politics we should all be sick of by now. My hope is for Obama and Richardson.
Change is not a slogan, it is a dream for what we could be if we worked together to care for each other and our world. ps. 61, white, female, retired corp vp...

Laughing at all of this...   March 11th, 2008 12:31 am ET

The real question each and every one of you should be asking yourselves instead of bickering over Hillary and Obama is: "What am I really contributing to the success of the Democratic Party in November?"

I mean, really, the real issue is stopping the Republicans from taking office again. Isn't our time better spent forging real plans instead of infighting like a bunch of losers?

Joseph Edgecombe   March 11th, 2008 12:31 am ET

LET US STICK TO THE FACTS

As Political Pioneer Shirley Chisholm Stated in 1972 Presidential Campaign againsr Richard Nixon, On the News program ISSUES and ANSWERS...Show "Time for Shirley Chisholm" When she would accept The V.P. Position??

She stated....

She is running for the Presicidency of the United States...and you can believe that.

Political Rasism is still alive and we must look to our political LEADER SHIRLEY CHISOLM Who addressed and conqured all of these issues and created much needed change in america so others like Barack Obama could follow in her footsteps.

Joseph, Boston

Gavin   March 11th, 2008 12:30 am ET

CLINTON IS WINNING BLUE STATE BIG TIME * * * * *

barack would need help to get into the executive branch....

I JUST KNOW SENATOR CLINTON IS READY 4 THIS JOB ON DAY 1 –

Kerry   March 11th, 2008 12:30 am ET

Experience does little for great leaders. Great leaders are born. You either have it or you don't.

Hillary has nothing. She is a fabricated. Everything that she has is due to Bill. That is why Bill can be anywhere he wants at 3am.

To combat McCain's age, Obama will need a man of similar background to McCain. To combat Obama's youth and charisma, McCain will need someone of similar background to Obama.

So, clearly, Hillary does not match the VP criteria that Obama requires.

Hillary-Persistence&Smarts 08   March 11th, 2008 12:30 am ET

Obama isn't manipulative? If he isn't, how in the hell has he fooled so many people? After all, he has little or nothing to offer. Ok twin ticket; Hillary and Ron Paul.
Go HIllary! Sulk and whine Obama. Those are two traits you are really polished at.

Kemic - Houston, Texas   March 11th, 2008 12:28 am ET

Hillary is posturing as though she were leading but instead, she is losing in all categories...pledged delegates, popular vote and states carried. In fact, she likely won't be able to close the gap before the convention. And last I checked, the team with the most points at the end of the game wins. Period. Using Clinton logic, the New England Patriots should have been awarded the Lombardi Trophy because (as far as the Patriots were concerned) they were the better team. I used to post on these blogs thinking that people cannot possibly be that stupid. But I know better now.

OBAMA '08

ROSE   March 11th, 2008 12:28 am ET

Senator Hillary Clinton has insights how a President does his duties. Being in The White House for eight years I'm sure she learned alot.

kelly   March 11th, 2008 12:28 am ET

It is not unreasonable that Hillary clinton is preparing for Obama as a VP. She does actually lead in the POPULAR vote by about 50,000

patrick   March 11th, 2008 12:26 am ET

im glad barack went after hillary on this vp thing i wish he would go after her on her experience perhaps it might be good to bring up the northern ireland conflict she says she helped resolve but the truth of the matter is she had no part in resolving that conflict that is just one of many lies she has told about her experience

Crowne   March 11th, 2008 12:25 am ET

Obama could never do a job as Vice President or President....too much blah blah blah, paperwork, actual WORK and long hours...!
Not too glamourous! He could not do it,,,he has no experience doing it!

Maryann   March 11th, 2008 12:25 am ET

I find it odd that Mc Cain is now the Republican Nominee and he himself has not mentioned or inferred who his VP would be.
Just curious why Hilary is indicating who hers might be when no one does this before they are the official nominee? Is she a bit self serving here?

floridalove   March 11th, 2008 12:24 am ET

I don't Hillary in Obamas' ticket. She is a disgraced to our party. she should however, run with McAngry after she endorsed him, this seems to be the most logical thing to do for her. Ah!, last, she should leave our party and join republicans once and for all.

So Much Vitriol   March 11th, 2008 12:24 am ET

Can the Obama supporters be civil and talk about the issues or anything besides just slinging insults at the other side and claiming Clinton is the divisive one? I think it's telling that Clinton is willing to make an overture towards unity (and no, she didn't say that it necessarily meant she was on top of the ticket) and Obama instead flatly denies it and would basically tell 50% of democratic voters that he doesn't care what they think. I can't imagine anything more arrogant and misguided than to tell 50% of your voting base to go take a flying leap. This is just more evidence of Obama's general ill-preparedness to be President. Obama, and his supporters need to grow up, get some real life experience, stop with the hate mongering, and stop claiming the other side is the negative one, as they call their opponent a monster. No one capable of thinking for themselves is buying it.

Tommy in St. Louis   March 11th, 2008 12:23 am ET

There is a lot more to this than what Candy Crowley is saying. The Clintons are playing head games. First, they are trying to dangle this bait in front of Obama, hoping he would be stupid enough to go after it. (Thank God he's not!) Secondly, they are trying to fog up voters' minds, make them think she is the frontrunner, because only a frontrunner could talk like this, when in fact she is not. They are treating Obama and his supporters in a very arrogant and condescending way. But the good nes is, none of this will really benefit her – her campaign is pretty much on its last legs, and Pennsylvania is going to be just another state in which her double-digit lead in the polls disappears, and she will make very little, if any, gain in terms of pledged delegates.

Sandy M   March 11th, 2008 12:23 am ET

Obama will never be president! Mc Caine will crush him like a ant. I wanted Hilary for sure. But i will turn to mccaine if it happens. The heck with change. I want security and safety for our nation. I want peace, but not at the price of being stupid. When Clinton was president i seem to remember the people voting for him for a second term, because he did a excellant job. Those were a great eight years to me. maybe you folks missed it.Hilary has taken all the big and important must win states. Guess you missed that too. If Florida and the other state would have been accepted, she would have won everything.It is amazing to hear people say change. What kind of change?? Change his underwear?? Thats all the man says for pete sakes. I see President McCaine if he gets nominated, you watch.

Dave   March 11th, 2008 12:22 am ET

One thing I can't stand is a person judging another without knowing that person. The Obama supporters always attack Hillary for being divisive, manipulative and stoop to anything. It appears the description fits more for Obama than Hillary. The guy has support of all blacks and pressuring black superdelegates to change over to Obama because he black. Just imagine if Hillary said all white superdelegates vote for me because I am white. Do you think that will go well with media but Obama gets away with it. Lets do this, at the end of primary, whomever garners the most popular votes gets the superdelegates. Lets do away with the delegates and go with the popular votes. I think Obama and his cult followers would scream injustice. The delegate system is old and outdated. Lets go with the popular vote. As a Hillary supporter, I will take that given that we do the primaries over again for Florida and Michigan. How dare the Democratic party to not count the participation of millions of voters. It is undemocratic at best. I hope Obama people are listening. Get your immature, thumb sucking, slime ball to your home and have him stay there. The world doesn't need his kind.

ddudine   March 11th, 2008 12:21 am ET

George Washington wasn't experienced either. Neither was Abraham Lincoln. Nor was John F. Kennedy. But they too were extraordinarily intelligent, and good and honest people. Barack Obama is in good company. He'll be fine. He'll be a breath of fresh air. We need that. The world needs it, too. Hillary Clinton does little more than tell people what she thinks they want to hear. No wonder her campaign people are falling apart.

Jen B.   March 11th, 2008 12:21 am ET

It is true that Clinton needs Obama, he does not need her.
It is true that Hillary needs Bill. At least until this campaign is over.
I don't see her as strong and independent at all; most woman with far fewer resources would have ditched a spouse like hers a long time ago.
The respect I had for her and her campaign at the beginning has gone and I am somewhat cynical about anything she has to say now as she travels the country to win voters.

kiss my grits hillary   March 11th, 2008 12:20 am ET

KISS MY GRITS HILLARY YOUR THE AIDE....

OBAMA IS THE PRESIDENT !!

ROSE   March 11th, 2008 12:20 am ET

Somebody needs to tell Senator Obama that winning primaries and caucus's is different then doing the duties of a President.

Jon   March 11th, 2008 12:19 am ET

Just a ploy to try and make Obama supporters think they will get something out of defecting.

seth, minneapolis   March 11th, 2008 12:19 am ET

Hillary wishes she was Barack Obama too.

Sandra   March 11th, 2008 12:18 am ET

Obama is arrogant because he doesn't want to be Clinton's (aka The Losing Candidate) vice president? He's not arrogant; he's sane. Having Hillary as your vice president would be like having Lady MacBeth watching your back. Are there enough food tasters in the world to make that work? To say Obama has baggage is nuts. In the interest of party unity he has steered clear of HER scandals ... but the Republicans won't. Hillary would have to defend the debacle of her attempt to reform health care, travel gate, Vince Foster, her amazing investment ability, etc. This kind of "experience" isn't a positive. Even the Republican Chicago papers admit Obama isn't implicated in the Rezko trial - one ill-advised real estate deal and Rezko's contributions donated to charity aren't a smoking gun.

Jeries   March 11th, 2008 12:18 am ET

i hope she doesn't put OBAMA. I would never ever vote for Obama. He lacks experience and his own ideas. He has not accomplished 1 thing for someone to vote for him. False Hope and Speeches are not going to help Hillary. Hillary should pick a better running mate. I believe in Hillary and hate the idea of OBAMA. People should stop judging Hillary because of her husband or prejudged reason but rather on the issues. Hillary is the only candidate who can fight and beat the republicans. She has the strength, ability, and real heart to make it to the WHITE HOUSE. Stop the hate toward the Hillary and open your eyes AMERICA!

HILLARY IS READY !

HILLARY '08!

EXPERIENCE+CHANGE=HILLARY

Valmont   March 11th, 2008 12:17 am ET

THAT'S JUST ABSURD!

I think this is her last political move/game/stance, when she lost Pennsylvania, she is GONE !!

No more cheap politics, no more double standard.

Viva Obama!

Patricia   March 11th, 2008 12:16 am ET

RealClear politics reports the current popular vote as:
Obama: 13,025,003 49.4%
Clinton: 12,421,316 47.1%

Carlos   March 11th, 2008 12:16 am ET

Obama/Colin Powell '08!!!

Johnny Chan   March 11th, 2008 12:15 am ET

The more I look at the response of Obama, the more clear it is that he is in it more for himself (or his race only) than for the Democratic Party. If he can get the nomination from the Republican Party, he will. The hard question for the Democratic voters (and in particular the superdelegates) is who stands a higher chance in the general election? The US people have got to be completely out of their mind if they are going to elect into the highest office someone who has professed a clear and long time "friendship" with well-known terrorists like Aires and racists and anti-semitists like his church reverend who has an unapologetically race (meaning black) agenda.

Floridian   March 11th, 2008 12:15 am ET

...Let me repeat myself as an independant to you democrats. Any ticket with Hillary on it means 8 more years of a republican president. End of Story.

nora from pittsburgh   March 11th, 2008 12:15 am ET

As a Pennsylvania voter, I am sure to be sick to my stomach for the next SEVEN weeks for the way she campaigns.

Funny story, though. On our evening news, there was a story about HRC visiting Washington & Jefferson College in nearby Washington, PA. The college kid they interviewed said "We really wish Barack was coming but we'll go see Hilary. We hope he comes later. As long as it's not McCain".

Tracy   March 11th, 2008 12:14 am ET

Her experience is all lies. She claims to have helped Ireland achieve peace, the man who won the nobel peace prize for his work in brokering peace in Ireland refers to Hillary as nothing more than a cheerleader who did nothing but walk around with Bill. Her trip to Bosnia that she claims she had to go on because it was too dangerous for the President? Guess who else went? Sheryl Crow and the comedian, Sinbad ! It was to entertain the troops...A USO trip!!! Who released that today? A former Clinton adviser who supprts Obama.

Wake up Hillary supporters, you're swallowing the bait hook, line and sinker.

ousmane   March 11th, 2008 12:14 am ET

I think this is another game been played by the Clintons. These folks calculated everyhing but this time it will not work. Americans underatnd better. They are ready to be double standard as long as the votes are coming. Please stop playing with our mind.

OT

Texas Democrat   March 11th, 2008 12:13 am ET

From what I can tell the Obama supporters are a self-righteous, snooty and hateful bunch. Any gesture from the Clinton Camp will be viewed with cynicism and malevolence. If Obama wins the nomination, I, a Hillary supporter, will make sure to vote for McCain so I won't taint Mr. Holiness Obama.

Crowne   March 11th, 2008 12:12 am ET

We cannot find a specific news report that indicates that Hillary Clinton has actually offered the VP spot to ANYONE. She was asked by the media and it has been proffered by the media that the "dream team' would be Clinton/Obama...the whole issue is totally absurd.
We fail as citizens of the United States to see how the candidacy of Pres/VP is some kind of a "dream" team. The positions are REAL jobs with intense job responsibilities, most of which are no DREAM. Please voters...the job is no DREAM!

ATL Republican   March 11th, 2008 12:12 am ET

Earl, you think Demos and Repubs agree on something? What planet are you on? Obama is the last person who needs to be in the White House. He will be so over whelmed, all he can do is run. If you love this country then you'll want the best for it. Let me help you out, it's not Obama.

Thomas   March 11th, 2008 12:11 am ET

Doesn't matter when all is said and done Obama will stand no chance against McCain in november.

Susan   March 11th, 2008 12:11 am ET

Hillary, for the good of the democratic party...just go away. You are a proven point as to why things don't get the job done, and we the people are sick to death of being ignored. This race is not about you, but it is about WE THE PEOPLE, and not you!!!!!!!!!

SKH   March 11th, 2008 12:11 am ET

I have read threw alot of what has been written and guess its my turn to put my nickle in.
I remember the Billary years. We were lied to, mis-informed, and as for not being in a war WHY was my daughter who was in the Navy sent to Kosovo? When you get down to it Kosovo was a stepping stone to the middle east.
HRC might have the experiance in cheating, lieing, munipulating, and double talk but I've seen or heard nothing that has giving her the experiance that would make her any better the OBAMA. Doesn't she realize that if you hang with pigs you get dirty?
Obama is trying to run a clean campaign by not throwing dirt at her and he has enough that he could. People should respect that.
As for a dream ticket. NO WAY!!! Not even with Obama as pres.
How can she be VP to him after all shes said about him? I think hes got more brains then that.
OBAMA 2008, LETS SEND BILLARY BACK TO THE PIGPEN WHERE THEY BELONG!!!!!

Shayne   March 11th, 2008 12:10 am ET

The message that Senator Obama should consider the Vice Presidency sounds very much like Senator Clinton's earlier position that he (Senator Obama) should wait his turn !

Johnny Chan   March 11th, 2008 12:10 am ET

The more I look at Obama's response to the possible (note the key word here : possible) ticket with him as the VP, the more I am convinced that he is not in this for the Democratic Party but for the Democratic Party with he himself as the presidential nominee. If he can get a nomination from the Republican, he will. The Democratic Party, esp. the superdelegates, need to think hard and deep who stands a greater chance in the general election. Yes, both candidates have supporters who like and dislike the others. However, do you think the US people are going to elect someone into the highest office who professed a clear "friendship" with terrorists like Aires? Are you kidding me?

Maryann   March 11th, 2008 12:09 am ET

Commenting on the different type of delgates that Hilary said there are.....Is she saying she would ignore any delegates that come from a Caucus as opposed to a Primary? Did she not know that for many many years there are caucus's in specific states? Did Bill not count his delegates from those type of elections when he ran for President. Cannot anyone tell her that she does not reinvent the wheel. She cannot overturn the pledge delegate lead. It has never been done this way before and the world is not made for just her election. The process is the same for all president elect's. Is this a Narsissistic candidate or does she think she runs the way the US votes these days?

Lynn in NM   March 11th, 2008 12:09 am ET

Obama would be making a big mistake if he lets Hillary be his VP candidate. Of course, he should be "on top" since he has won the majority of the states. This is Hillary's way of trying to wheedle more votes. Be smart. Vote for Obama!

Tom   March 11th, 2008 12:08 am ET

Would CNN stop referring to Texas as Hillary's "victory"? Obama won more delegates. CNN is just part of the media spoiling for a fight ... and I am beginning to think 4 more years of Clinton deception, obfuscation, and psycho-drama.

Mildred   March 11th, 2008 12:07 am ET

Obama is the MAN. Go Obama.

nht   March 11th, 2008 12:07 am ET

i'm sick of obama, make him go away, same old, same old speech

Z   March 11th, 2008 12:06 am ET

Obama and Clinton a dream ticket??? HAHAHAHAHAH

You Dems are so funny!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

frances elizabeth   March 11th, 2008 12:04 am ET

In your dreams, Hillary. Sigh.

Wade Ens   March 11th, 2008 12:04 am ET

Hillary wants Obama in the White House to answer the phone for her at 3:00 am in the morning.

It's too bad Obama told Ohio and Texas he would open up the free Trade deal. But told Canada it was just political campaigning and nothing to it.
What else did Obama say that was just politicing, personally I think we should be able to trust a leader.

Time to consider McCain ?

Ron   March 11th, 2008 12:04 am ET

I am dumbfounded that CNN the "Best" has not seen through this Politics 101. The Clintons have you and Ms. Croowley duped. "The Keep them Guessing" strategy works only if you are dumb enough to let it happen or if you are a PARTY to this dumbness. Which one are You? You all have chased this dog enough... Why don't we look under her coat tail a little. She's just standing there waiting for you all to be thrown another bone! Chase this one! Let's get real!
Barack is the true leader.
He may have lost Texas in the popular vote, yet won the delegates...Hm!! She has not beaten him by a hughe majority yet. Those states he lost garnered him enough votes, i.e. Texas etc., to easily project that with the votes he will pick up by being the nominee allows him to win the state in November.
The Hillary and Bill show gets 2 times the coverage Barack does on your show. Rather than showing several live feeds from Barack you show Ms. Crawley talking about what she thinks Barack is saying, yet you show live feeds of Bill and Hillary. Giving them twice as much air time. Come on guys you can be better than that. Do I have to watch MSNBC? You're almost getting to the "Fix News" acclaim.. Only Jack is calling it straight!

ralph tyler   March 11th, 2008 12:03 am ET

Hillary Clinton is just a pain. I would rather have 4 more years of Bush.

True Democrat   March 11th, 2008 12:02 am ET

Hillary's brand of politics is exactly what Obama is campaigning to end... I believe the American people are smarter than to fall for this latest trick from the deceitful and woefully mismanaged Clinton campaign.

NEVER has the candidate in first place accepted an offer of VP from one of the lesser candidates. Does Hillary somehow think she's ENTITLED to the Presidency? It would seem that way since she's offering positions as though she's clinched the nomination. It's presumptuous, insincere and insulting.

The simple reality is that Sen. Obama will win this nomination by sea and by air... he will lead her in delegates and the popular vote by the convention, and the Super Delegates will ratify his nomination. Hillary should concede with what dignity she has left and perhaps Obama will see past all the personal attacks she has brought against him and extend her a position in his White House.

Hope. Change. Strength. The right choice for America!

OBAMA '08!!!

Walter G   March 11th, 2008 12:01 am ET

Why has Obama not got anything to say about the Presidency of Bill Clinton?
Where was Obama during Bill Clinton's presidency?
What does he have to say about the economic management of the Clinton years?
Why are the media so mute on all the good benefits that African Americans, and all Americans enjoyed during the Clinton years, but only refer to his failings?
Why is it that the media show John Kerry endorsement of Obama as a positive when Kerry LOST could not even beat Bush in 2004?
Is there a possibility that Kerry is supporting a nominee who will lose to McCain?
Why doesn't Obama specify what changes he would make to back his claim that he would do politics in Washington differently?
Does Clinton not spell out the changes she would make?
It was noticed in the debates in Texas and Ohio that instead of outlining the "changes" he would make, he merely agreed with those that Clinton has outlined. Did he copy most of Clkinton's health care proposal, and merely inserted a little twist regarding how people would pay for it? Experience tells people like Canadians and some EU countries that some plans like health care MUST be mandated for all, with government financial support for those who cannot pay.
INexperience is revealed when one tries to say " yes, I agree with universal coverage, but I don't want to mandate it.
Well check human nature in the Western world, Mr. O!!!. What would happen if all some state governments governments said " Well, to drive an automobile, drivers' licences are NOT mandatory, you can still drive if you want to - without penalty?

be human   March 11th, 2008 12:01 am ET

hilary..?
obama...?
hilary..?
obama...?

its funny how politics has so conveniently been labeled a game.... its a race for da precidency, not about who is a better person, or a fit leader. its like being at a store where 2 competetitors, wid thier product being, hilary and obama respectively, are waging marketing wars to da people of america. this so called blog is evidence as to how divided the people are in this counrty. we preach freedom and liberty to the world, yet are unable to to stand next to our fellow man with different opinions. the president only represents wat da people vote for, and our last 2 elections testifies wat kind of gunho soceity we are emerging to be. i think whoever may become president, either hilary or obama, dey wil have a lot on their plates and will have a very difficult time on delivering on promises dey make now. the whole idea of elections, campaigning, and wat not is jus to get votes. and guess wat, regardless of the out come, it will mostly affect the average american families, the people, us. a president doesnt make a nation, we, da people do. and unless we bond togeda, wats da worth of defending this great nation, of the divided........?????

Think Beyond The Obvious   March 11th, 2008 12:01 am ET

Hillary and Bill mentioned about the dream team not because of not what the majority of you think the reason is. Hillary and Bill aren't stupid! They both know very well that Barack will flatly reject the idea-and it worked!

If Hillary becomes the nominee, she is not obligated or pressured to ask Barack as her running mate. She can choose anyone she wants as Barack already rejected the notion of being the V.P. It is not because she wants the black votes.

You guys are so easily fooled!

To moderator: I dare you reject my comment

Liz   March 11th, 2008 12:01 am ET

Candy Crowley should go back to writing about municipal politics. A serious political analyst/reporter she is not. (Nor are any of the rest of the pack). She is so biased toward favoring the Obama camp that she makes a mockery of journalism. When I turn on CNN I expect to hear unbiased commentary and facts, not the consistently skewed reportage that we are subjected too. Goodnight and goodbye CNN.

MujerPorHillary   March 11th, 2008 12:00 am ET

I honestly think it would be good for Obama to be vice President and Hillary Clinton the President. Think about it, after more experience, Obama could run for president in the future. I know he knows she's a great candidate. Consider it Obama.
I know if he runs for President in the future, he'll get elected. But Hillary through her experience would be the best president now.
I wish Obama was more humble to accept Vice Presidency if Hillary gets nominated. I'm sure Hillary would accept Vice Presidency if he gets nominated.

ABC=Anybody But Clinton   March 10th, 2008 11:59 pm ET

Ummm...has anyone told Hillary that she is LOSING the race?

Texas Voter   March 10th, 2008 11:58 pm ET

Obama can't win the states necessary to win in November. Ohio, Pennsylvania, Florida, etc. If he couldn't win those swing states he he can't win in November. Obama '08 will end up with a Republican in the White House again.

Maria Avare Florida   March 10th, 2008 11:57 pm ET

A Vice President does not have to be ready on day one, Only the
President has to be. Ideally Obama, second on the ticket, could learn
on the job, during Clintons 4 year Presidency. Then later become a
great leader more ready to respond to that red phone call! The vice president is a helpmate, not the decider. The chance that Hillary wouldn't survive is slim to none! Still, its safe for Hillary to choose him, because Obama is a fast learner and he would follow her lead.

G.N. Penley   March 10th, 2008 11:57 pm ET

The Clintons are great at double-speak, mudslinging, and lying, lying, lying. And neither of them can imagine losing to anyone. We've all known that for decades. So what's new?

Marcie Bodeaux   March 10th, 2008 11:56 pm ET

It is not all that far-fetched to suggest a Clinton/Obama ticket when they BOTH carry over 13 million votes! If Clinton wins the nomination, it would be a good to include the other half of the party. Let’s be inclusive, why not?

As of 3/8/08 the popular vote total looks like this: Obama has 13,025,003 votes (49.40%) to Clinton’s 12,421,316 votes (47.10%)

But with Florida and Michigan thrown in, Clinton flips to the top with 13,620,611 votes (47.40%) to Obama’s 13,601,217 votes (47.30%)

This is a close race folks. But you would not know it if you listen to those who say Clinton should step aside and let the Democratic Party prepare for the general election. No way. Why do you think Michigan and Florida bucked the party? They wanted to have a say in the selection of a candidate. So, now just keep your socks on and let all of the states vote. Let’s see who comes out on top when all states have voted.

Huh?   March 10th, 2008 11:55 pm ET

I thought Hillary had campaigned for McGovern against Nixon. So why is she trying to pull a Hubert Humphrey and cripple the front-running Democrat for the general election? On reflection had she decided the Nixon presidency wasn't so bad?

Z   March 10th, 2008 11:55 pm ET

Another Democrat circus act!!!!!!!!! HAHA

Thank God for Republicans!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

McCain 2008

Voter   March 10th, 2008 11:54 pm ET

GO HILLARY! KEEP MOVING ON, KEEP GOING STRONG, GO ALL THE WAY!

Dayahka   March 10th, 2008 11:54 pm ET

Presumably then, JFK at 44 should have been Johnson's VP? And pray tell, Hillary, was JFK too young to be C-in-C?

Debbie   March 10th, 2008 11:53 pm ET

Clinton offering the VP position to Obama is not hers to offer, Hello, he's the front runner, he has more votes, won more states. Bill may have been able to blow smoke in your face but that no reason to be delusional. Nobody in the Clinton camp want to admit that Obama has won more states and the majority of states that he lost to Clinton in is not by a wide margin. a 51% – 48% victory in Texas is as close to a tie as anything. And all this talk of corruption, oh I'm sorry I meant experience is overrated.

Samuel from Texas   March 10th, 2008 11:52 pm ET

Hillary would not make a good vice president. She would stab obama in the back

Dayahka   March 10th, 2008 11:50 pm ET

No more Maui Wowee for you, Bill...This is not a dream ticket, it would be a nightmare ticket for Obama to select Hillary as his VP.

Terry   March 10th, 2008 11:50 pm ET

The only dream ticket is Hillary and Bill minus Obama.

How I See It!   March 10th, 2008 11:49 pm ET

Reality is setting in with Senator Clinton. She knows that she has fallen behind, and the best thing for her to do is come up with an inclusive plan to attract Senator Obama's supporters.

Give it up Hillary! That is so low. If you can't win people honestly, just go sit down.

She can't win by herself and she can't win with Obama.

In her heart she knows it's over, but I guess she is trying to keep her dream alive. Well, keep dreaming, but it's time for her to take it somewhere else.

Kurt   March 10th, 2008 11:48 pm ET

Vote Hillary! She is WAY more qualified and not only has the experience but more importantly has the KNOWLEDGE to be president.
Obama will LOSE to McCain. Obama is the next McGovern

Justjean   March 10th, 2008 11:48 pm ET

Come on Mississippi. Show us all what you think of this person's arrogance...offering the front runner the second position, then saying today what Obama had the wisdom to say all along...it is too early to be talking about VP candidates.

Jean   March 10th, 2008 11:48 pm ET

Hillary is just being gracious to Obama, as if to say IF the super delegates make her the Demo candidate, trying to soften the blow and disappointment, there might be a place for Obama as VP.......but Barrack has said before "it's NOW or never for him to be President....Michelle has said he will not run again....he is trying to create some urgency for HIM to be the candidate now,....OR he'll just go home......I've always said.....Obama is ADHD...unless he can travel the world as President, he has no interest in sitting in the oval office, alone, with no audience to cheer him on......he is not party loyal, Michelle is not proud to be an American --- I love it that the Clintons are finally snaking out the TRUTH about Obama, so his supporters can think this over.....it is for sure the super delegates will look at the much bigger picture.......Hillary 08

TJ Earle   March 10th, 2008 11:47 pm ET

Hillary Clinton like her husband are frauds. Like the rest of them including George Bush they think the American people are ignorant, naive, and intellectually lazy, every nation on this planet is working towards change but this country. It is not that we the people don't want it but we have people in power who are trying to keep us where they want us. It is time to rise up and demand more and get results. Go Obama.

Cruiser66   March 10th, 2008 11:46 pm ET

This is just plain stupidity from the Clintons. Obama has more pledged delegates. He has more popular votes. My logic is not the greatest, but how can the loser suggest that she should be first and he second. I think it was a ploy that backfired. I also think that the Clintons will do and say whatever they think my work. Moreover, if anyone believes that Hillary would actually be the "REAL" President if she should become president is living on Mars. BILL will be president again.

Ozz   March 10th, 2008 11:45 pm ET

There is also a problem with the way the MEDIA say thing too about these officials running to be the next president of this country.

We all know that the MEDIA have to make money from advertisment from these candidates when they run a commercial, but they the MEDIA need to be more open minded as well. I see a lot of BIASNESS a lot of times which is bad for one candidate or another...

Think about what i'm saying? You know who you are.

LA, CA....

Mary Mittelsted   March 10th, 2008 11:45 pm ET

Hillary is showing how desperate she really is. She knows that she will not win the nomination fairly, so she and her husband will try anything and do anything and say anything to win. If they do somehow cheat and win the nomination, I will vote for McCain. For the sake of the democratic party and the country she should suspend her candidacy. But that is the problem, it is not about the country or the party, it is about her and her husband's legacy.

Ray Rheaume   March 10th, 2008 11:45 pm ET

Hillary's offering "2 for Tuesdays" starting on March 11th.

Does this mean we get 'double coupon days" in November?

Ed K.   March 10th, 2008 11:44 pm ET

I think Hillary would be foolish to have him on the ticket. Electing a women will be hard but electing a women and a Black man would be impossible. The country is getting there but it has a ways to go.

Trevor   March 10th, 2008 11:43 pm ET

One more thought... I think Hillary's campaign has finally "jumped the shark" in suggesting that Obama be her running mate while she's actually losing the race to him. This is no doubt a turning point... I can't wait for her to point out his lack of experience again after suggesting he be her VP... doing so would be nothing more than delusional psycho-babble... how dumb do you think we are Hillary? You set yourself up for it.

And another thing... how comfortable do you think Hillary will be sitting at the same desk, in the same exact office, where her husband on multiple occasions fornicated with an intern? It's got to get to her at some point, I mean... c'mon really, think about it... would you want to take over your ex's job and their office where they were caught screwing around with the help... on the desk? Yeah... good luck with that!

Kimberly Sterrett   March 10th, 2008 11:41 pm ET

Subject THIS IS CLOSE

The Doctors Says:

A French doctor says, "Medicine in my country is so advanced that we can take a kidney out of one man, put it in another, and have him out looking for work in six weeks."

A German doctor says, "That is nothing. We can take a lung out of one person, put it in another, and have him out looking for work in four weeks."

A British doctor says, "In my country medicine is so advanced that we can take half a heart out of one person, put it in another, and have both of them out looking for work in two weeks."

The American doctor, not to be outdone, interjected, "You guys are way behind. We are about to take a woman with no brains, and no heart, put her In the White House, and then half the country will be out looking for work."

Hillary-Persistence&Smarts 08   March 10th, 2008 11:41 pm ET

You know what? I initially thought of a Clinton/Obama ticket after Bill came up with the idea but I would rather she had McCain as her vice president then that nobama swell headed nonothing fueled by who knows what kind of bizarre trip with his who knows what is up church of his and Farrakan? Spare me, really. Nobama is a sickening dude with nothing to offer except his meaningless charisma which signifies nothing and has no direction.
p.s. He should be happy if Hillary wanted him to be vice president because it's a big jump from being a senator and he sure isn't qualified to be president.

Anne Marie   March 10th, 2008 11:40 pm ET

Hillar y somehow think that she is entitled to the president's position in the White House despite her second place position. I don't know why she doesn't just move in. This presumptuous behaviour should not be tolerated by the electorate. America reject Hillary and her Republican tatics. Obama 2008.

Steve   March 10th, 2008 11:40 pm ET

Hillary to Obama: Back of the bus!

Ed K.   March 10th, 2008 11:40 pm ET

Wolf,
I notice CNN is now back to pushing Obama. I watched this weekend and today and all you see and hear is Obama, Obama and Obama. I've heard his HOPE speech until it's starting to get real old. Why can't CNN just report both Candidates evenly? After bashing Hillary for months she gets a little reprieve from CNN and wins Texas and Ohio then the Obama fans complain because CNN stopped giving him 80% of their air time and it looks like CNN is responding to their cries. Just be fair!!!!!

Luke   March 10th, 2008 11:39 pm ET

I don't like a liar to be the VP of Hillary, he's good only in singing but no solution in doing something, talk and talk can't solve the problem.

kfutrell   March 10th, 2008 11:39 pm ET

Where does Clinton get off suggesting that O'bama be vice president when O'bama is in 1st place? I thought O'bama wasn't ready to be President, now she's suggesting she be vice president? That statement contradicts her earlier statement that a vice president should be ready day 1. When called on it, now she's stopping all that talk. Sorry folks, Clinton makes me sick. She flip flops all over the place. I have voted republican all my life. This is the first election that I am going to vote democrat. O'bama makes me feel something that I haven't felt in a long time. Hope. If O'bama doesn't win the democratic primary I will vote for Mccain even though I don't like him. I just don't like Clinton more.

Leah, PA   March 10th, 2008 11:39 pm ET

It's a good test that clearly shows Obama is in the game plainly for the power

smustaro   March 10th, 2008 11:38 pm ET

The more I read , the more I see, we're all getting to the same page. If " They " give this nomination to Obama, about 50% of all Dems are going to be voting for MC Cain. That's roughly the amount of the state splits. He's slightly ofer 50% of the vote in most places. Keep it up rude people.

steve   March 10th, 2008 11:38 pm ET

UNBELIEVABLE! This totally ticks me off!! This is more clintonesque doublespeak, designed only at re-framing obama as #2. There is NO concern for the party or sincerity in the idea...its disgusting, pretentious, and frustrating! Albeit only time will show if voters are stupid enough to make it effective. C'mon billary...compete above board. But then you know doing so exposes your shallow self-serving agenda and need for power.

One Voice   March 10th, 2008 11:38 pm ET

NEVEROBAMA needs to wake up! Your candidate (Hillary) sure thinks enough of Obama to suggest on multiple fronts the possibility of a joint ticket. Oh but maybe that's her self-serving, political machine at work....she really doesn't mean it, does she? At this point, Hillary has shown her true colors, as well as proven that she will do WHATEVER necessary to get the nomination...America is really TIRED of the same ole politics. Isn't there a two term limit on the Presidency....Bill can't run again. Enough of the Clintons and thank goodness we're getting out of the Bushes.

Barack the Vote!

anne   March 10th, 2008 11:38 pm ET

To the Clintons "the end justifies the means".Hilllary will trample over anybody or anything to get what she wants.Lies or truths are interchangeable if Bill or Hillary want to achieve something.

TEE   March 10th, 2008 11:37 pm ET

Senator Clinton is trying her sympathy trick, again. She has no intentions to joint ticket with Senator Obama. Ask her about the running her possible running mate from Pennsylvania.

JJ in NY   March 10th, 2008 11:36 pm ET

GOD LOVES AMERICA AND AMERICA HATES HILLARY. Her sleazy attempt to short-circuit Obama's campaign is backfiring. This is yet another example of the woman who would be queen but can't even manage her own campaign .

Juanito   March 10th, 2008 11:35 pm ET

The comments on many of these blogs, and particularly this one, are truly frightening. First, illiteracy is apparently running rampant with so many people unable to write 3 – 4 coherent complete sentences that are spelled properly. These people get to vote - how scary. Second, people who see their vote choice being between Clinton and McCain have no credibility in the Democratic party and must secretly be wishing for a Bush third term with continuing international mayhem. Finally, it amazes me that so many Democrats want to chose a strident, manipulative, moody, rude, angry, reactive and deceitful human being for President. These are the qualities of Republicans. I am giving my head a shake.

Harry   March 10th, 2008 11:34 pm ET

Anyone who some how thinks that a Clinton-Obama or Obama-Clinton ticket is unstoppable is CRAZY.

I WILL NOT VOTE FOR OBAMA-CLINTON CLINTON-OBAMA.

I am a big, huge Obama supporter. I'm trying to help him win my state (Pennsylvania). And if Obama took the VP under Clinton, I would lose respect for him because it would be proving that he's really not going for change. Could the argument be made that he's trying to unify the party? Yes. However, Clinton winning the White House is a bad thing, worse I believe, than John McCain.

That said, if it's an Obama-Clinton ticket, I'd be rather unhappy too. The Clinton's have had a negative influence on American politics. This is unfortunate, given that Bill had a decent 8 years in office.

I'm 22, born in 1985. In the White House (VP!) was a Bush. Then a Bush was president. Then Clinton was president. Then a Bush. The last thing I want is another Clinton. Not only do I think that she'll be extremely polarizing (more than G.W. Bush), but I can't stand the thought of a Democratic royal line, just like the Republicans have the Bush's. I've never been too keen on Camelot. We don't need a Waterlot.

teachnator   March 10th, 2008 11:33 pm ET

Where's Hillary's experience? There is none. Where's her "likeability"? There is none. Where are her ideas to change America for the better? There are none. She & Slick Willy are the most dirty, despicable, disgusting "couple" in America. Please stop taking a swill of their KoolAid & think for youself. Vote McCain or Obama. Or... a true Dream ticket – "Mr. Experience" McCain, "Mr. Change" Obama! Try that for once, America! I'd vote for it!

wheres tax records hillary?   March 10th, 2008 11:33 pm ET

HILLARY IS DESPERATE AS EVER. ACTING LIKE SHE'S IN THE DRIVERS SEAT WHEN YOUR CLEARLY LOSING IS A NEW LOW– EVEN FOR THE CLINTONS.

LIKE OBAMA SAID IN ONE OF HIS DEBATES.... " HILLARY CAN BE MY AIDE" SOUNDS LIKE THE RIGHT POSITION FOR HILLARY.

BILL CLINTON TO EVEN SUGGEST THIS IS BENEATH AN EX-PRESIDENT. JUST GOES TO SHOW HOW LOW A CLINTON WILL GO TO SUIT THEIR MEANS. CORRUPT.

OBAMA '08 : REAL CHANGE – FOR REAL AMERICA

Trevor   March 10th, 2008 11:31 pm ET

Ok, I have a comment. Since 1981, the Vice President or President role has always been filled by a member of 2 families... the Bushes and the Clintons. It began with W Senior under Reagan and may continue with the election of Hillary. Electing Hillary would continue the 2-family domination of presidential politics to a minimum of 32 years of 2 families holding the hightest power (4 yrs as VP and 28 yrs. as President). Am I the only one who sees something inheretingly wrong with this??? Why wouldn't we elect someone outside of these two families during a span of 32 years to these capacities??? Just doesn't seem right. Why doesn't this ever get pointed out in the media? I predict that in 30 years it'll be Jenna vs. Chealsea :-) Just food for thought...

Ozz   March 10th, 2008 11:31 pm ET

Who is Obama running agains?

The wife/the Husband? The former President Clinton make a lot of cynicism/racial remarks witout knowing he is saying it, because when you get right down to it, in is head he is looking at who is ahead of his wife in this election to be President of this country.

The former President Clinton is wondering how could a black man be winning agains a white woman. So race is a factor in his head and the blacks that is voting for the Clinton should look in to these remarks that Senator Clinton Husband is makiing and think about them very HARD.

My opinion is; there should be no more Clinton elected to live in the WHITE HOUSE. Did people forget why the CLINTONS left the WHITE HOUSE?

Obama will be the next President and he will be a very good one too because he is a thinker for the people and all the people and not just one group like the Clintons are doing now. And OBAMA see what is taking place in this country from the bottom up.

Without an open mind and a brain to go with it, no one should be the president of any country.

LA, CA...
.

traci   March 10th, 2008 11:30 pm ET

I hope that this is read. Review Hiliary voting record. She sponcered a bill and voted against making English the offical language of the United States Of America. Now I ask you, how can this monster become President. She is the worst type of liberal. I believe that government should help people but not carry people. I work at a hospital and I see people from other countries, do not speak english getting Medicare/Medicaid. However my own grandmother went into a nursing home used her savings 1st, then applied for Medicaid. She made $3.00 over the limitation amount. We had to hire a lawyer for $3.00 a month. This is the Dems in action. Lets give everyone a free ride EXCEPT Americans.

smustaro   March 10th, 2008 11:30 pm ET

Despite the need to hate, Hillary is the old guard Democrat.
It is her duty to try & unify this. How many times have we heard her say "We're friends", referring to Obama? How many times have we heard her say she is honored to be running with him? How many times has she said she would not be opposed to being with Obama?

You miserable people will use anything to make her bad. I'm so tired of hearing this.

If your candidate Obama was a sincere Democrat, he'd be making an effort, any effort but instead he continues to divide this party. He is dividing our country by race now too. All of that work, all of the gains we've made are going. How we will survive this campaign is going to be a miracle.

Wayne, Wentzville MO   March 10th, 2008 11:28 pm ET

Any ticket with Hillary on it, is a sheer ticket to absolute disaster. Senator Barack Obama isn't going to be egged on by the Clinton folks, because he's much smarter than that. She's trying to fight her way back into the Whitehouse by any and every means necessary., and Americans are saying "NO!"

Senator Barack Obama will choose on his own, whom he feels is the best choice for the VP job. Whoever his choice for the post is, it most certainly will not be Hillary, that's for sure.

julian riano   March 10th, 2008 11:28 pm ET

What prideful man. This is a petty way of saying he would not consider a join ticket, I would then find my self undecided. Considering McCain isn't that bad a guy the Democratic Party has blown a good thing time and again. al gore lost because he was so smug and so can Obama.

Penny Leonard   March 10th, 2008 11:28 pm ET

1) Hilly Clinton Whined when she felt she was not getting enough CNN air time so Cnn ran scared and gives her Chelsey and Bill and her speaches all the time and longer time and Obama gets only 1 min of free time of talk. 2)She whined when she said at the last debate she ALWAYS gets the first question and she "feels" she is tough and should be the next Commander in Chief !!!3)She yells shame on you Barack Obama on TV!! 4) She goes on SNL and jokes around !!5)She and Bill say Obama could be considered as VP to try to trick the Miss. voters into voting for her!! the old "okie odk" 6)She knows she can not win this primary unless she WHINES about Florida and Michigan votes and the news people cave in to her moods and hormonal swings...The only CHANGE in Hillary is to CHANGE RULES to force news people into talking about this Florida and Michigan.....NO take responsibility Clintons.....Oh and WHERE ARE THOSE TAX RETURNS?????NOW

Gina   March 10th, 2008 11:27 pm ET

When will this woman give up?! She has no shame and she's delusional.

Louis James   March 10th, 2008 11:27 pm ET

Saying you won’t take the v.p. spot doesn’t convince anyone of your drive to become president. I feel Obama made a huge political mistake here. Don’t be surprised if Hillary uses this against him. If Obama wants the presidency so much, he should be willing to take a v.p. spot on any presidential ticket. Also, Obama is exhibiting his own hypocrisy here since he campaigns on being the person most able to unite people and America. Yet he can barely bring his own political party together. He is just barely the front runner as the race is essentially tied. Clinton may still win. If the delegates and super-delegates have to elect a the party’s nominee, they may not be so thrilled by Obama’s indignation at the idea of serving the party and America as vice president.

Anonymous   March 10th, 2008 11:27 pm ET

I really cannot comprehend all of the hate for Hillary on these forums. Do you guys realize all of the things she's done for our party and America as a whole? It's a much easier life to work a 9-to-5 job and sit at home watching movies with your kids. Hillary spends 12+ hrs/day working for the American ppl and the Dem party. Show some respect please.

I like Obama and I appreciate that he has never said any of the spiteful things ya'll are saying.

dan in MA   March 10th, 2008 11:26 pm ET

I've been pushing for the Dream Ticket since August...It was so obvious...Hillary and Barak working side by side! Only together could they ensure victory against the Republicans...Now, some Democrats think Obama can go it alone...I disagree...We need real unity...not just hype. I believe Hillary has the better chance against the Republicans in general, and McCain specifically...She's more aggressive and has a record as an agent of change, from the time Jimmy Carter appointed her to work giving legal aid to the poor, to her work getting handicapped children better access to the public school system, to her time as the most progressive First Lady in our nation's history. We all knew she was gonna run this year. This is our chance to make maximum historical impact...She is our best shot at securing the goals that all Dems want.

Karen   March 10th, 2008 11:25 pm ET

By now I shouldn't be surprised when I read a comment that says: "Obama only hold speeches." Did you listen to the debates???
Would you call those speeches? Both candidates hold speeches at every rally, or wherever they are, when they talk to potential voters. They are called "stump speeches". So the statements referring to the often made statements that Barrack Obama only hold speeches doesn't hold water.

America4ever   March 10th, 2008 11:25 pm ET

Me thinks Senator Obama protests too much. And this whole, Obama for VP has been summized by the media and not actually said by the Clintons. Case in point, each newsbroadcast I watched tonight had no footage of either Clinton saying Obama should be VP, but every outlet showed Obama's saying I am not running for VP. This is balanced reporting?

bob   March 10th, 2008 11:24 pm ET

Never in one hundred year

VOTER FOR TRUTH, DIGNITY   March 10th, 2008 11:24 pm ET

She & Bill are desperate. Obama is winning and they will
do anything to get your vote. They will do anything, at any
cost to win the nomination. This is just a ploy to get us
to vote for Hillary, so that if we choose her over Obama,
the Americans will feel that they are doing the right thing
for both Obama and Hillary.
The problem with that is that Hillary and Bill do not keep
their promises. She would trick us by saying. after she
would win the nomination, that she changed her mind!!
Do not put anything past her and her husband, Bill.

OBAMA for Pres. 2008 Nothing Less.

sad   March 10th, 2008 11:23 pm ET

I have waited all my life to vote for a qualified, capable woman to be our next president. I know older women have been quick to jump on this opportunity because we have never had this opportunity in the history of our nation(wow). Why aren't the younger women more attuned to this opportunity?

sharong   March 10th, 2008 11:23 pm ET

One last thing before I go to bed . . . "She's melting" I loved your comment and quote from the "wizard of oz"! You are right on!
You got Hillary in a nutshell!

Gene   March 10th, 2008 11:22 pm ET

Hillary's the BEST!!!!!!!!! GOOOOOOOOOOOOO Hillary!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :)

Terrie in Texas   March 10th, 2008 11:21 pm ET

Enough already. Honestly, coming together would bring the Democratic Party together. I'd like to see them together, not fighting each other. I'd like to see the Obama voters and Clinton voters come together for the good of their country and kick the Repubicans out of The White House.

W B   March 10th, 2008 11:21 pm ET

I wonder is it fair that Hillary Clinton and John McCain have tabs to story about them on CNN Politics and Barack Obama doesn't. Only CNN can answer that one, maybe they just overlooked it. But I think it would be more balanced it they take those two off or add him; so people that wants to know about story written about him can be found on their site.

BLONDIE   March 10th, 2008 11:21 pm ET

FIRST OF ALL, THE MEDIA IS PUTTING A SPIN ON WHAT HILLARY AND BILL SAID. ACCORDING TO THE SOUND BITES NEITHER ONE SAID THAT THEY THINK OBAMA SHOULD BE VP. THEY MERELY STATED THAT THE TWO TOGETHER WOULD BE UNSTOPPABLE. THERE WAS NO MENTION OF WHO WOULD HAVE TOP BILLING. ONCE AGAIN THE DEMOCRATS THAT HATE THE CLINTON'S HEAR WHAT THEY WANT TO HEAR. AT LEAST SHE WOULD DO WHATEVER IT TAKES TO UNITE THE PARTY. IT DOESN'T SEEM THAT OBAMA WOULD CONSIDER IT. JUST WORDS!!!! HE IS A SELF-RIGHTEOUS EGOMANIAC. REMEMBER WHAT GOES UP MUST COME DOWN.

WestCoastMessenger   March 10th, 2008 11:21 pm ET

HILLARY CLINTON has made a masterful move, as did John Kerry in moving Edwards into the VP slot in the '04 campaign. It may sound distasteful to the junior senator from Illinois, but in the end he gets a promotion, and this is truly a GOLDEN TICKET. Here's what's going to happen: 1) Hillary sweeps Pennsylvania, 2) Hillary sweeps Florida in a re-vote. 3) Hillary will have a substantial lead in the popular vote, 4) SuperDelegates will see the benefit of moving in this direction, based on the Good of the Nation for the Good of the States. The competitor has not been able to close the deal otherwise, this is a grand settlement in compromise.

Esther   March 10th, 2008 11:21 pm ET

Can Sen. Obama count how many ELECTORAL VOTES in general Election means: Florida, Michigan, California, New York, Ohio, Arizona, Texas, Nevada, New Jersey, MA and the rest states that Hillary Clinton won?????
Attention Sen. Obama: Could you ask to Al Gore what happen en 2000? or John Kerry in 2004????
Sen. Obama the red states you won are and will be RED STATES in general election... you will be red or republican votes in November 2008, please don't get ilusion now it is just "game" for republicans!
Hillary Clinton is the best candidate to win 2008 the general election for the democrat.

Anonymous   March 10th, 2008 11:19 pm ET

dirty politicians

G   March 10th, 2008 11:19 pm ET

I can't figure out why Mr. Obama doesn't suggest that Hillary could be John Edward's VP running mate? :o )

Teresa W.   March 10th, 2008 11:19 pm ET

The only way I see Hillary Clinton winning this race is by cheating because even if, she wins any or all states, she will still remain behind by the number of votes. The math is clear, the votes have spoken. The people have spoken that they want Obama and not Hillary. For all the Hillary Clinton supporters, this race is based on ethnicity not the issues. Rather than voting for the qualified person such as Obama for a true political change, you rather place your vote is based on popularity which is common for those whom are uneducated about the Clinton history. If, Obama is nominated for president, the Clinton voters will vote against Obama and vote for McCain whom already knows that the Clinton supporters will based their votes on a certain race to remain in the white house rather than a African American. For 200 years, there has only been a white president in the white house. The government is not about to change a 200 year old tradition. But traditions can be changed. It's time for change people, our government is corrupt/broken, our economy is falling, the healthcare system sucks, our military system is faultering. Please, for once, let's put the right person in the White House. I want our children of American to know that this is a fair and just country of democracy. Not the Tyrants of a corrupt country. We should show the world that we are not indifferemt about race or new frontiers. We are the leaders of democracy.

Oh Really   March 10th, 2008 11:19 pm ET

Sen. Clinton has some **** nerve. You're effectively still in SECOND place, yet you offer second place to the person currently in FIRST. What gall. This isn't a horse race or a game of marbles. This is for the Presidency of the United States. Your utter lack of decorum and respect sickens me. If Sen. Obama were to even entertain such a notion, it would tarnish his credibility and campaign, which is what the intent was. We are not buying what you are selling, Clintons. It is no longer the 90's. We cannot go back in time.

Alex   March 10th, 2008 11:19 pm ET

The Clintonites are such snobs! You can almost hear them say "flyover country" under their breath. Small states doesn't matter to them. Not big enough for them, you see. Well, isn't that how Democrats lost the general election twice in a row? Wow, what a smart strategy, aren't we all amazed by it the third time around.

H.Cummings   March 10th, 2008 11:19 pm ET

Give me a break CNN – this is propaganda from a losing team, quit floating this crap out there, start making less of a deal of this garbage and more of the FACT that Obama is winning in all catagories and if anyone was to be VP, It would be Hillary – But she doesnt qualify!

Obama-Edwards 08!

John   March 10th, 2008 11:18 pm ET

Obama supporters are so stupid. They said Hillary needs Obama, Obama does not need Hillary. Actually Obama needs Hillary more, the reason is that his background. Hillary win all the big states except IL. If this is republican party, Hillary win the nominate already.

Diane   March 10th, 2008 11:18 pm ET

What a farce! She can't win based on delegates, the super-delegates are jumping over to Obama and so she starts acting like she already has won. If this is what the Democratic party is allowing to happen I think I'll go Independent or Republican! Someone at the head of the Democratic party had best start reeling in this couple! They are no longer the 'power couple' and Hillary isn't owed the presidential candidate spot just because she stuck with Bill through all his problems. Remember she said that was for love, not politics. Oh, I guess I almost forgot that we couldn't trust anything she says or does!

Charlotte   March 10th, 2008 11:18 pm ET

I cannot believe the Obama-bots, they actually believe Rush was able to get Republicans to vote for Hillary. Isn't it Obama who is always talking about the Obamakins?

ab   March 10th, 2008 11:17 pm ET

from all those blogs pro I feel, hear, read tremendous amount of hate from Obama's supporters. They go with hate, no spelling, no good grammar, hate, hate, ridicule, insults..... they are ignorant, not intelligent to me. They lack any modesty, any respect, any thing which makes human being human -real human. They call pro-Hillary people old and uneducated. How arrogant! How intelligent is this comment?

Why crowds get so hypnotized? Not only in this case, but in history it was few of leaders ( which were nothing to be proud of – they caused a lot of suffering).

In Obama's response is very much of arrogance, very much of some kind extreme egoism and selfishness, not being able to cooperate with party he claims is part of. And complete lack of diplomatic approach to this subject.
Obama is very self centered individual. All is about him, not nation, not people. He will not care about this nation if elected.... if he would think about us, he would not say either he will be elected or forget it. What kind of approach is this? Very immature, selfish, not caring about anything else but himself and himself and himself. His glory. Not people, economy, education. Not the service to people, to country. It is either him or no one?
Is there anything to un-hypnotize people?

Mark   March 10th, 2008 11:15 pm ET

Rather than campaigning, Bill should give advise to Mr. Spitzer and Hillary to Mrs. Spitzer. We'll see Billary will achieve more of these experiences once they are in WH

Gillis Phoenix, AZ   March 10th, 2008 11:15 pm ET

YOU CAN’T HANDLE THE TRUTH!

If your orders are always followed. Why would it be necessary to transfer Santiago off the base? If all Obama brings is the speech he gave in 2002. Why would it be prudent in your “judgment” to make him your vice president? YOU CAN’T HANDLE THE TRUTH!

You hid your tax returns and are doctoring your documents. My fellow democrats I move that we go to the article of impeachment, candidate Hillary has rights.

HILLARYous, is it?

Frankie   March 10th, 2008 11:13 pm ET

The Clinton's and Vanilla Ice.....3 things that should have been left in the 90's

sand   March 10th, 2008 11:13 pm ET

I think HIllary has integirty and is qualified...Obama is the most arrogant male I have ever seen...I am a Demo but I will not vote for him ....he needs an serious attitude adjustment and his wife certainly needs one...I am a woman and I cant see any woman voting for this man, as he certainly does not know how to respect a woman ,,,,and is so self absorbed it make me sick

Abralex   March 10th, 2008 11:12 pm ET

He is going to be the president of The United States of America.You can't even be the VP when he become the president because you are not the kind of person America needs at this moment.

Esther   March 10th, 2008 11:12 pm ET

Well, since "independent or republicans" are supporting Sen. Obama (can you watch de red states he won?) there are a lot coincidencies betwenn He and all republican politicians. For me Sen. Obama represent the secure ticket for Republicans keep de White HOuse.
In a normal primaries, where Florida and Michigan votes count...we are talking about more 200 hundred delegates "discount" to Hillary Clinton! Please, the democracy of this country in the right to express politically in the vote. If Democrat Party want to rules de constitutional right of the democrats.... Now I could understand why republicans are laugh a lots about how stupid things happen in the blue party.
Hillary technically are winning in the BIGGEST States, traditionally blue, so real democrats are decide, BUT republicans are supporing Sen. Obama (monetary and with vote) and are destroying the Democrat party! What going on now?
Since republican are select the candidates, now they will playing in the democrats primaries and in consecuenses.......the Democrats will divided and destroy. Can Sen. Obama understand that or He will be the next Joe Lieberman?

J. McKinney SW MO   March 10th, 2008 11:12 pm ET

Sorry, I mistyped above. Her mother said she was "crying and trembling", not shaking and trembling. Correction.

Jim from Kingwood, TX   March 10th, 2008 11:12 pm ET

We the people are tired of dynasties (Kennedys, Bushes, Clintons). My wish is that BOTH Clintons would go back to private life and be do-gooders like the Carters. That is where their work is need the most.

Frankly, the most important issue to me is health care. Hillary had 8 years as the surrogate Vice President to do something about it (her goal). She FAILED miserably. Why should I believe that she can NOW do what she couldn't before?

It is time for change and I believe that it starts with the Presidential ticket and continues with Congress. VOTE OUT ALL the Congress (especially Senators) ,that have been there more than 8 years.

Elect Obama and let him lead by inspiration, like Reagan did in the 80's. We need a strong cheerleader now that can rally America behind the government.

Hillary, go back to New York, or Arkansas, or wherever you are from.

Frankie   March 10th, 2008 11:12 pm ET

America the Beautiful is the dumbest poster I've ever read.

ATB, you do know that Hillary is not Bill and she wasn't the President back in the 90's? She was his wife. That's it. The "Clintons" weren't President. Bill Clinton was. By your logic, Chelsea or Roger Clinton could be President.

I'm frightened that people this dumb are allowed to vote.

Jesse   March 10th, 2008 11:11 pm ET

Last time I heard Obama is in the lead! Hillary has the right to inflate her ego and pick any VP she wants, but she looks really ridiculous doing so! Its a way for her to attract glorified undecided voters. Obama will not be taken by her manipulations!

Gerry   March 10th, 2008 11:11 pm ET

All HIllary should do is focus on releasing her tax information, the presidential papers and a list of donators to the presidential library and the Clinton charity.

That all has to be vetted before Obama would ever consider her as VP.

Little Lance   March 10th, 2008 11:11 pm ET

What are you people ragging-on about? The Idea of a combo ticket has been around for a long time. This is nothing new. When did Edwards drop out? That was day one for this suggestion.

LMAO   March 10th, 2008 11:11 pm ET

These comments are hillarious. the Obama camp is NUTS!!

Hillary never offered him the VEAP, though she should have, she simply talked about a joint ticket.

J-O-I-N-I-N-G...Remember that old slogan called unity? I swear I heard that some where during this primary season.

By the way, equating the VP slot to the Commander in Chief is also quite silly. How many presidents were actually sworn in from that position? 2 out of 43?

PeterO   March 10th, 2008 11:10 pm ET

Too funny.... almost all analysts agree that he will have the lead in delegates and popular vote with or without FL and MI, and she has the audicity to ask him to be VP at this point.

Cindy   March 10th, 2008 11:10 pm ET

Hillary's being totally disengenuous. Sorry, but I do not trust this woman. Why offer him the VP spot? Why not offer herself as the VP instead?

It's so obvious.. she is so totally incensed that this young upstart Senator is stealing her thunder. She offers him the opportunity to allow her to ride on his coattails? Gimme a break. She is not the nominee.

No respect, Hillary. You show no respect to your opponent, or the Democratic process in place.

Come Wednesday, after Mississippi is done voting, you'll return back to your normal kitchen sink self. You're so obvious.

sharong   March 10th, 2008 11:10 pm ET

For America the beautiful and Anne E:
I voted for Bill Clinton twice and yes, I thought he was a good President, even if he had no morals. Hillary showed how prestige
hungry she was even then. Threre was women coming out of the
walls saying they went to bed with Bill. Most women would forgive a man one short affair but would not stay with a guy who was cheating on her all over the place for years and having it brought out on national
TV! Why didn't she divorce him? She wouldn't be 1st lady anymore!
Now it's payback time, so she's making him go out and campaign for
her to atone for his sins! It's no wonder the man has aged so much
in the last 10 years, she's got him by the balls. I never liked her then and I do not like her now! I remember seeing a bumper sticker on a car back then that said, "IMPEACH THE PRESIDENT . . . AND BILL TOO! She was arrogant and pushy and manipulative back then too.
I believe Barack will straighten things out but it may take him longer
than 4 years to undo the damage Bush has done.

Charlotte   March 10th, 2008 11:10 pm ET

Yes, It shows her desire to unite the party.

brenda   March 10th, 2008 11:08 pm ET

I think it is a wonderful idea! President Clinton and VP Obama. History would surley be made because then we would have the first woman and the first black in the oval office. These two groups of people have been kicked around and never allowed to advance since the beginning of this country. The white man has always ruled and look at where that has gotten us! Im tired of wars and corruption and spending like there is no tomorrow. Women are always better at budgeting money and "running the household". A famous Frenchman sat back and observed this countries birth and the role that each person played. It was determined that, in fact, the women of this great country DID and continue to do the hard work. If you really wnat to know what this country is about and where we all came from, read DEMOCRACY IN AMERICA by the great Alexis DeTocqeville.

Elle   March 10th, 2008 11:07 pm ET

While it is strategy on Hillarys part,it only shows her brilliant mind and
allows us to view Obama on the defensive,showing himself rather undemocratic and arrogant in his effort to reject the thought of being a VP.Furthermore to consider Hillary as part of his team is not even a consideration in his campaign.
Obama does not lead the popular vote unless you leave FL and Michigan out of the democratic race which would be unconstitutional.
In addition as a Indiana resident I have the confidence to see Hillary win here as well as Pennsylvenia which puts the majority vote back in Hillarys corner even without seating FL and MI.
Obama is not viable as a candidate.He has not any primaries that will be secure the democrats the white house in the general election.
For a better tomorrow Hillary 2008

The Truth   March 10th, 2008 11:07 pm ET

Look, I'm waiting for the Obama/Clinton sex scandal to come out... You can smell the sexual energy in the air between these two. I look for the ticket to happen, eight years of hillary and then eight years of Barack, with a love child born between them midway. Billary O'Clinton...

Paul   March 10th, 2008 11:07 pm ET

As a Delegate for Senator Obama in Colorado, I voted for Clinton in 1992, I did not know him or the first lady, as most did not. Senator Obama, represents America just as Bill Clinton. Senator Obama has provided leadership and directions in both parties. Senator Obama , won't lead us to UN-NEEDED wars, when others (Clinton's) did so politically . We are in a time, that does not need division, no matter here in the USA or World Wide. I truly believe America is ready for change that We All Can Believe In.
By the way, I was terminated by a private employer, after being asked after the Caucus, who I was pledging too. They were non supporters of Obama, of course they were Hillary's. (O:

korn   March 10th, 2008 11:07 pm ET

Please All,

either Obama-Clinto or Clinton Obama would make a best case against Mccain, the media again love to spin this up!

Byron in CA   March 10th, 2008 11:07 pm ET

I understand it's much more entertaining for CNN to spin this in a negative light at Mrs. Clinton, but in fairness to each candidate, why don't I see the other side of the coin in a positive way for Mrs. Clinton if the report is to be really valid. You know, perspective!

Michele   March 10th, 2008 11:06 pm ET

I am so glad that all of the Obama supporters are so well educated. I have a headache from reading all of the broken English coming from these young, educated people. Take your above $50,000 income and buy yourselves a better education!

m.procope   March 10th, 2008 11:06 pm ET

Obama should ask Bill Clinton to be his running mate.
merv

Byron in CA   March 10th, 2008 11:05 pm ET

I understand it's much more entertaining for CNN to spin this in a negative light at Mrs. Clinton, but in fairness to each candidate, why don't I see the other side of the coin in a positive way for Mrs. Clinton if the report is to be really valid. You know, perspective!

Brian   March 10th, 2008 11:05 pm ET

Barack is wrong about one thing, this is not same old Washington politics. This is a new level of trickery and deception that she's sunk to...

Akua   March 10th, 2008 11:05 pm ET

I pray for Obama and God will take him to the finish line....ahead of Hilary and MCcain eventually

Joann Kujawa--MN   March 10th, 2008 11:05 pm ET

I have previously always supported the Clintons. Not anymore. Hillary is being arrogant and ruthless and is trying to destroy the Democratic Party with her antics. Superdelegates, take note!!! She stepped over the line when she said Obama wasn't qualified to be President. He's held elective office longer than she has and has more national security experience than Bill Clinton did when he ran and Bill did well in that area. I had been feeling so positive and hopeful about America with an Obama wins. Now Hillary has turned this in to something cynical and sleazy–like it's a big game. I feel deflated.

Matt   March 10th, 2008 11:05 pm ET

Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton need to move to Asia and leave the rest of the country alone. Politics don't need them. The country doesn't need them. She needs to realize she is not destined to win and just drop out. She is losing big, and Pennslyvania isn't going to close the gap one bit unless she wins by like 80 points.

I saw someone say "Obama wants to leave 5 million out in MI and FL" WRONG! Obama actually supports finding a way to redo the vote. Considering Obama wasn't even on the MI ballot, and didn't campaign in Florida, how is it fair to just give those states to Hillary?! In Florida, they voted on namesake alone, which is exactly why Clinton lead in every poll from the beginning of her campaign until January, people didn't know Obama! I have no problem witha woman being the President, but not this woman.

Clinton supporters need to quit whinning and Clinton needs to do whats right if she wants a Democrat to win in November. She is tearing down Obama and ruining his chances in November. All she is doing is hurting her chances for 2016...

OBAMA 08!

Mark   March 10th, 2008 11:05 pm ET

Once Obama gets the VP experience, he will be the part of the establishment and later, he will not be able to claim that he is an agent of change. As Hillary P, Bill will be the high profile diguised VP or chief adviser to P.

Clinton/Obama or Obama/Clinton ticket will be long term disaster for the country. Because though both of them are democrats, they are fundamentally different. Clinton is the opportunist who used all her links to grab the power. And Obama is a self made person who came to this far using his own talent.

Valerie Lucious   March 10th, 2008 11:05 pm ET

Anyone with any sense can see what Hillary is doing. I had great respect for her before this race. Seeing the tactics she uses makes me wonder how any woman can vote for her. We just don't operate or think like that.

Dave   March 10th, 2008 11:03 pm ET

CNN: Please stop reporting that Clinton won Texas! When the caucus votes are finally done being counted Obama will receive the most delegates from that state!

V. Sheldon   March 10th, 2008 11:03 pm ET

Hillary's tactics are to cloud the real issues at hand, sow discorrd and
fear,confuse and spin the issues. This is nothing more than another spin cycle from the Clinton's and their operatives and it will come back to haunt them. They are banking on the ignorance of the electorate and their fears. In this they are no better than GW Bush and Karl Rove. It is time to categorically reject these fear tactics and have some sort of substantive discussions. Unfortunately, get Bill and Hill together and the issues just naturally cloud, and the political lies begin. I hope this whole tactic comes back to bite Her.
Reject these spin tactics, America!

Charlie Tree & Mr. Hsu   March 10th, 2008 11:02 pm ET

IN THEIR DREAMS!!

vicky staggs   March 10th, 2008 11:02 pm ET

In response to the person who said if Obama wins the nomination, "I will become a McCain Ocrat: " Many many more people will become McCainoCrats if Hillary wins the nomination. Most of my fellow Republicans can't wait – Hillary has been despised for so long (even by many yellow dog Democrats) around here, everyone knows it's going to be a vote against Hillary instead of a vote for McCain if she wins the nomination. In Obama's case, a lot of Republicans like him as a person, but don't agree with his policies – he's seen as a more competitive opponent because he's so likeable. Let's face it...Hillary looks like the textbook example of the word for female dog. vs

Texas   March 10th, 2008 11:01 pm ET

Someone please remind Hillary that Texas is a "red" state! She keeps saying that Obama only wins the small states that are "red" and she's won all of the big ones. Yes, Texas is big and red! She narrowly won the popular votes (not delegates) because Republicans here want her and not Obama. Obama does not ever need Hillary! Give me a break........

Jacque Bauer   March 10th, 2008 11:01 pm ET

IN THEIR DREAMS!

Dominique Bera   March 10th, 2008 11:00 pm ET

For many months, I was okay with a Clinton-Obama or an Obama-Clinton ticket as I was very proud of the Democratic party and both Hillary and Barack for the civil way they were conducting themselves. But ever since Hillary got up and starting screaming, "Shame on you Barack!" I have been just apalled at her negativity. I hope she loses and loses bad! Barack Obama shouldn't even consider Clinton for a running mate. She would stab him in the back to take him down. That's just who she is. She will try to win this election at any cost. I can't believe she's comparing herself to, of all people, John McCain when it comes to "experience!" How absurd! Obama has no more or less experience than Bill Clinton had, and his presidency turned out just fine. Obama will make a fine president. Hillary Clinton will make neither a fine president or vice president. She's ripping our party apart for her own advancement. Her divisive, self-serving tactics are appalling. If she wins the nomination (God forbid) I will vote Green!

Obama all the way!!

KAY   March 10th, 2008 11:00 pm ET

There are several differences in Obama and Billary....for all you Hillary supporters...she has her husband and daughter out there stumping for her, because BILL was a president and not a good one (don't make me go there....he CLOSED military bases all over the US); I digress....

One thing Obama can do that Hillary can't is FILL at 20,000 arena with voters, with more outside listening over an intercom. Hilllary can pull maybe 2,500. TOPS. AMERICA HAS THEIR NUMBER and it isn't Hillary 2008!

We are looking for freshness in this party and you will not get that with Hillary....

IF by chance she pulls this off with the super delegates; then every person in the United States that voted for Obama and the super delegates took it away from him....America should be screaming fraud and get Hillary out of the whitehouse immediately.

For you Hillary voters...she could care less about you...you are a HEADCOUNT...NO A PERSON – JUST A VOTE....she is evil and feels it is her god given right to the CIC. The world is watching Obama and they are happy to see someone new for this world...and it ain't BILLARY (remember .. you get THEM BOTH AND THAT SCARES THE HELL OUT OF ME AND SHOULD SCARE YOU TOO.

KE   March 10th, 2008 11:00 pm ET

Why America always demonized by some and even Sen. Hillary Clinton? They stick their heads out and some people would love to use it for their political gain. If you ask common people on the street why they don't like Amarica or even Hillary Clinton, I bet they have heard time answering why.

Sen. Clinton gave people benefit of doubt about possibilities of working with Sen. Obama. I think it's a good gesture than saying flat "no" to the question. Now we know that won't work so it's a good thing.

Somebody wrote here that how Sen. Obama has stolen the election. Funny that's how I felt from the beginning although it's hard to point out why.

I remember I was surprised when Sen. Obama was invited by Black Union he didn't attend because he was too busy campaigning in Ohio.

John B of Dallas   March 10th, 2008 11:00 pm ET

Listen up, everyone! It's time to do some thinking and searching for yourself. Hillary is just using manipulation to spread negative thoughts, doubts and simple phrase sound bites. Any you know what? It's working! So, PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE get a true perspective on these candidates. Where are those web sites that do "fact checks"? The simple statement is that NO CANDIDATE has experience at being president, unless someone's running for re-election. George Bush has experience at being president. This idea about being ready on day one is just nonsense. NO ONE could be ready on day one to be president!

Young Rep   March 10th, 2008 10:59 pm ET

Obama's reponse is pretty weak and he needs to be stronger aganist Clinton's attacks if he is going to stand up aganist the Republications... Personally Obama ran 8 years to soon IMHO.. he would be a shoe-in if he ran in 2012 or 2016. I find it crazy that Obama who's part of the Congressional Black Caucus(CDC) doesn't have a single leadership roll. He's the only Senator and he's running for President. That doesn't make sense but maybe someone could give me a reason for this. I like the way Obama has gotten so many people involved in the election process even though I don't agree with him on several issues. And please, I don't want to hear any Obama supporters bashing on McCain cause your not going to change my vote. I've already done more homework then most people and I tend to see alot of Obama supports being very rude to people who don't like or won't vote for him.

Lilly   March 10th, 2008 10:59 pm ET

Please see some great videos about Obama to support why he would be a great president. He has been saying what he is saying today for years. It is definitely refreshing.........for a politician in this century. NO SPIN.....

Anonymous   March 10th, 2008 10:58 pm ET

There are no better people at political spin than the Clintons. I can't help but think that making history is at the heart of their rlelentless banter. While I admire Bill Clinton, (now that he is an ex-President) I think that Hillary Clinton is an egomaniacal person who is ruthless and untrustworthy. She does not have the temperament that we need in the White House at this time.

Would both of you PLEASE go back into private life and be do-gooders like the Carters. We have had enough of Clinton-esque. We are tired of dynasties (Kennedys, Bushes, Clintons). History has shown us that vision often times means more than experience.

We want change...not more Clintons.

Karen   March 10th, 2008 10:58 pm ET

Obama a uniter???
Obama does not want politics as usual?

Obama has inspired bitterness on the internet
I've never seen or heard or read before.

Obama supporters read what you're writing.

My vote just switched. I don't want to be in company
with such bitter, complaining people.

borrega   March 10th, 2008 10:57 pm ET

Obama gives a good speech and I admire his effort...however, Hillary is a stronger candidate and a natural leader. Obama gives a good presentation and means well but I could not sleep at night if he would win the nomination...I truely believe that if Obama wins the nomination the democrat party will not win the election...because if the ballot is Obama vs. Mccain.... unfortunately the republican party will win. I believe the republican's are supporting Obama more than Hillary because they know that it will be easier to win at the end. If Obama wins the nomination I will have to go to the republican side.

OLIVIA   March 10th, 2008 10:57 pm ET

Im catholic, if Hillary loses, ill vote for mccain. Who cares about cheap talk.

Matt   March 10th, 2008 10:57 pm ET

"t's called reaching out and trying to unite the party you negative immature Obama supporting pin heads."

Umm, no. If the witch wanted to unite the party, she should drop out...

bochk   March 10th, 2008 10:56 pm ET

Obama is just no different from other politician. He is certainly exploiting his star power. He has no experience or qualification whatsoever. He is not even qualified for the VP job. Clinton should choose John Edwards instead.

Karen, NJ   March 10th, 2008 10:56 pm ET

REAL CLEAR POLITICS ELECTION 2008

Democrats Obama-Clinton Spread

Total Delegates 1589 – 1470 Obama + 119
Pledged Delegates 1378 – 1223 Obama + 155
Popular Vote 49.4 – 47.1 Obama +2.3
Popular Vote (w/FL) 48.3 – 47.2 Obama +1.1
Nat'l RCP Average 47.5 – 43.8 Obama +3.7
Pennsylvania 35.8 – 47.5 Clinton +11.7
North Carolina 47.3 – 38.5 Obama +8.8

General Election McCain-Obama McCain-Clinton
National Obama +5.0 Clinton +2.0
Pennsylvania Obama +2.0 McCain +0.3
Ohio Obama +0.2 Clinton +0.5
Florida McCain +9.3 McCain +5.6

More General Election Polls | Charts | Latest Polls

So.... who's leading again? And what about FL? Obama does MUCH better than McCain in FL... a win? Yep! Remember, FL is GOP Land... or IS IT!?

Lora B.   March 10th, 2008 10:55 pm ET

Well, I don't think Obama is ready to be president, although he would make a good vice president.

Obama spoke out against the war, however, we don't know how he would have voted on the issue since he wasn't in the senate at the time.

Maybe Obama would have gone on vacation to Hawaii when it came time to vote to give Bush the authority to use force against Saddam, just like he did when it was time to vote on important gun legislation as a state senator. Or, perhaps he would have voted "present" like he did the other 112 times as a senator.

As vice president, Obama would get lots of on-the-job training on how to make really difficult decisions on really important issues since he appears to be decision-challenged.

Francesca   March 10th, 2008 10:55 pm ET

You have to go back to the start of this. Hillary had just beaten Barack up badly – and she was asked by CBS whether she'd consider him for vice president. If you listen to her answer, and how she's been speaking on this, she was cornered and she was afraid of coming off too mean and nasty as the gracious victor of the Ohio primary if she dismissed or didn't answer this question. So she said it could happen as long as she was on the top of the ticket. Her answers ever since have been always been conditional. She was never serious about it. Now she's caught and she has to spin her way out of it. Bill's been slightly more serious but that's only to play mindgames with the public to get them to see Barack more as a veep than a president. Barack should ignore this and get back to his uplifting, hopeful message.

Mandy   March 10th, 2008 10:55 pm ET

CNN stop moderating the blogs that question Mr. Obama!! Boy this really shows how biased you really are!!!

beachnan   March 10th, 2008 10:54 pm ET

What's the matter CNN-can't put something on that is pro-Hillary. You do put a lot of nasty comments by the Obamanites, who by the way, are being divisive, by their usual personal insults. Please post my comments about the votes. The young and obviously inexperienced backers of Obama need to realize that the elections are all about the electoral college, and Hillary's wins reflect a much stronger candidacy than her opponent. For all their blustering, you would think their candidate was ahead by millions of votes-not so. Grow up.

Janel, St. Paul, MN   March 10th, 2008 10:54 pm ET

I believe for most Obama supporters that the thought he would agree to a VP position is unthinkable!

We've supported him because of his leadership, his vision and his desire to change Washington. Should he become a VP candidate, his supporters would become most terrificly disappointed and many, I believe, would not vote for a Clinton-Obama ticket.

This woman–Clinton–will stop at nothing. She is disgusting!!

Michael Kelow   March 10th, 2008 10:52 pm ET

I'm tired of Hillary playing these little nasty political stunts. This is a new day and the American people are not dumb. What experience does she have at commander in chief. None! Let's check her record. She couldn't construct the health care coverage for all Americans when her husband was president. Remember she was over that, that failed. She also voted for the war in Iraq. Another mistake in judgement. Then She claims to bring the soliders home from Iraq in 60 days, but she can't even bring Bill home a night. We don't need all this drama over again in the White House.

maya   March 10th, 2008 10:51 pm ET

Uh, Jude, with all due respect, how can you possibly say that all states that voted blue will be blue in the general? It's more the big swing states such as Ohio, New Jersey, New York, Florida, etc that are the key. They are called swing states for a reason- and Obama has not shown up to this point that he can capture them. Very concerning esp since we will be running against a moderate Republican (McCain) who will attract many moderate Dems and Independents.

Marie H.   March 10th, 2008 10:51 pm ET

Sorry folks!!!! Presently the race is about tied. Neither one can make it to the nomination. It is really sickening to hear Obama followers telling Clinton to quit!!!!! How about Obama quitting and going back to wherever he came from. Open your eyes you Democrats. Just maybe when the REAL Obama finally steps to the plate, he will make Bush look good. Bits and pieces are beginning to unravel and it can be practically guaranteed, there is more to follow. At this time he is a bad choice for anything. Hillary should not even conside him as a running mate, nor should she consider being his running mate, IF he continues to mislead you Hillary "basher" into believing he is something he is not, thereby getting the nomination. Heaven help us!!! The only solution at this time is Hillary Clinton!!!!

Britt   March 10th, 2008 10:51 pm ET

Hilary is out of control. Why would the person that is in the lead, Obama, bow down and agree to be her VP. How can the person that is in second place approach the person that is in second place and offer them the "chance" to be their standin. If anything she should be his VP. She clearly thinks that she is more deserving of the nomination but it is obvious that we the American people do not agree.
I am so sick of the Clintons and their high and mighty attitude. As a young black woman this is one of the many, many, many reasons why I will not be voting for Hilary. At this point the only way that she can secure the nomination is to cheat (and I don't put anything past she and HONEST Bill). If they allow the delegates from FL and MI to count I will change my party affiliation.

Melissa Atlanta, GA   March 10th, 2008 10:51 pm ET

This strategy on the part of Clinton machine is not only smart it demonstrates just how savvy they are and exposes just how naive Obama is. Clinton has been hinting at a joint ticket for a couple of weeks now and this has helped her in OH and TX. Voters are thinking "well, I like them both, they are both mostly the same; if I choose Hilary, she will get Obama as VP." So voters are thinking they can have their cake and eat it too. And only now is Obama reacting to this saying that he is not running for VP. Obama needs to win some of Clinton's campaign advisers to his side.

vicky staggs   March 10th, 2008 10:51 pm ET

I am a Republican who appreciates the high road that Barack Obama has taken thru all of this. I am not sure if I am going to vote for John McCain or Barack Obama: but I am not voting for Hillary Clinton. How can anyone in their right mind not see thru Bill or Hillary? How dense can a person become? Vicky

Donna R.   March 10th, 2008 10:49 pm ET

After reading so many of these comments I see just how this election has divided this country. Hillary Clinton's statement was to let the country know that she is open to having the "Dream Ticket" that most of the country would like to see. But after Barack Obama's statement today I see his willingness to divide this country to achieve his goal. I thought he represented change and of bringing this country back together again. I thought that he wanted what is positive for this country, and yet he is showing a side of himself that represents more of the same. He should have kept people guessing on where he stood.

Pennsylvania for Obama   March 10th, 2008 10:49 pm ET

Everytime I see Lanny Davis or that lady Kiki on cable news, I am going to donate $1 to the Obama campaign. I want other Obama supporters to also do the same. YES WE CAN!

caldreamin   March 10th, 2008 10:49 pm ET

This Blog is overwelmingly bias for Obama. Obama needs to not burn bridges. If Hillary gets MI & FL scheduled for a re-vote, she gets a mandatory 50+ superdelagates before results of the election are final. If Obama was a better politician, he would have not painted himself into a box today. He just looks petty. He has fallen for Hillary's trap and he is the one who can't be magnanimous and gracefully concede that unity is the way to win an election. It sounds like a continuation of politics of the past and he is a hypocrite!

Edgar   March 10th, 2008 10:48 pm ET

Jay and Ed – please get real because your hatred of the Clintons is beyond basic political science studies.

Know more about you candidate before you talk bad about the Clintons!!!

keith   March 10th, 2008 10:48 pm ET

Never.

Please stop begging Hillary. You're disrespecting yourself.

BTW...where are your papers that document your real wages and real proof about your "35 years of experience".

We're waiting for the real story.

Client 9 needs your help though.

Pennsylvania for Obama   March 10th, 2008 10:48 pm ET

I don't think this is playing out too well for Hillary and Bill. It was a good tactic but didn't pan out for them thus far. They will say and do anything to be in the White House. Most Americans do not trust the Clintons, which is mostly due to them lying to us in the 1990's.

SG   March 10th, 2008 10:48 pm ET

I think Obama is doing well to point out the hypocrisy of Clinton's suggestion, and the presumptive arrogance of subordinating the leader to the number 2 position. I hope he, or his surrogates, go further to point out that it is 1) a purely political ploy to woo his supporters (youth, blacks, high-earners and educated) whom she can't get on her own; and 2) intended to change public (and accurate) perceptions that he is the front-runner. If he already has decided that he would not accept a VP offer (and I hope that he wouldn't), he should tell voters in no uncertain terms: "you can't get 2-for-1 by voting Clinton. If you want me, I need your vote NOW."

Bill Zitterkopf   March 10th, 2008 10:47 pm ET

The comment has been analyzed as one that is gaming or strategic against Obama. I don't believe that it was meant to be strategically against him, instead, it is ultimately significant when democrates look at defeating republicans, particularly John McCain. The combined ticket with Hillary as the President will result in a win, the other may not.

Edgar   March 10th, 2008 10:46 pm ET

Ed – the Obama supporters are the ones who had to many kool aid drinks.

How well do the Obama supporters know him and his political views! Get ready because the Republicans will turn every stone to find out who he really is even go to the extreme can call him the Anti-Christ!!!

Wake up – Liberal democrats this could back fire huge!!!!

Cindy   March 10th, 2008 10:46 pm ET

The inflamatory remarks resolve nothing. Having worked in a precinct that voted 90% Obama in Texas , the people on the streets understand the power of both of these candidates beiing on the same ticket. The vast majority approved and encourgaged this move. For a campaign that talks about unity, bringing all together, being inclusive, pride seems to be getting in the way of sanity.

Whether it is Clinton/Obama or Obama/ Clinton this is the right move for the Democratic Party and America. The first step in bring hope for the future to reality.

GGamma   March 10th, 2008 10:46 pm ET

Forget about join ticket or dream ticket, whatever you call!..just let see who will be in the finish-line of this MARATHON including bill!!

Jallen   March 10th, 2008 10:45 pm ET

Liars can make figures, but unfortunately for Hillary, FIGURES DON'T LIE. She is not the frontrunner. Her bogus VP offer was just sad. What a pretentious and dispicable move. I think this was even lower than Rush Limbaugh's "republicans vote for Hillary" stunt ( Which has seemingly become a considerable source of votes for her). So spare me any comments that Obama is unable to unite the party, when the only crossover votes she is pulling in are republican votes against Obama that will never vote for her in the general election.

J. McKinney SW MO   March 10th, 2008 10:45 pm ET

What scares the heck out of me is all the young people who are voting for Obama because they are caught up in the "superstar frenzy" of it all, but have no idea what this country needs. For instance, the girl who was in the "3 a.m." ad of Clinton's, where she was the little girl sleeping, and she is now 17, and is working feverishly for Obama. Her mother said she went to one of his rallies, and after shaking his hand, she was 'shaking and trembling'. Good God! That kind of stupidity is just what we need deciding who will run this great country. We need Hillary, and the super delegates should decide who to vote for using the reason they were developed. Good heads who understand politics the the problems of the country, deciding who best can run the country, and who can win the election from the Republicans.
We need Hillary's experience, and I think/hope the superdelegates have the good sense to vote in this way.

Ishondo   March 10th, 2008 10:44 pm ET

Well let’s see, supposedly Obama supporters can not write grammatically correct, and Clinton supporters can not add. Did I miss something? When did the term of Office change from every four years to every eight then back to four? (See deb 3/10/2008 6:47pm ET) To speak of experience is like an HR representative only looking at your resume if you have a degree. Guess what, only 24 percent of the American population had received a Bachelor’s degree by 2006. That is a total of 56,068,000 who have an education greater than a Bachelor’s degree, out of 233,194,000 Americans over the age of 15. Now if experience is all that matters then why is unemployment only 4.9 right now instead of 76 percent, because people have natural talents that allow them to do the job. Like any job what matters is who will be able to live up to their responsibilities in that job. Hillary plays politics, which tells me she will play politics in office. We have seen what playing politics has brought us for the last seven years. She also can not control her staff or her husband, which is quite disturbing in itself. What would be best is to pay attention to how a campaign is run to see how the individual in question would run their office. It is easy to see that the Obama campaign is a well oiled machine. Sure he has had a few missteps but nothing like the chaos of the Clinton campaign.

Last thought to leave you with, Obama has been pulling in independents, young voters, and Republicans. If Clinton ends up on the ticket anywhere you can guarantee that all those voters will either stay home on Election Day or vote for McCain and all the ground the Democrats have gained will be for nothing.

Zion   March 10th, 2008 10:44 pm ET

There should be an investigation opened on the Clinton’s and their relationship with the Republican Party. It is truly not clear any more if the Clintons are supporting the Democratic Party or the Republican Party. The way this election has been run by the Clintons suggests that they are willing to sacrifice the stability of the Democratic Party. The day to day comments about the front runner of the Democratic Party, Barack Obama, reverberates a subliminal message that is stereotypical about African Americans in America. This is not helping the Democratic Party and it is helping the Republican by supplying ammunition that will help the republicans win this election. This is an attempt to continue the Clinton-Bush presidency read and beware to make a well educated decision based on the real facts that are not discussed or presented in the main stream media.

Roger, AR   March 10th, 2008 10:43 pm ET

Hillary just knew that a lot of democrats would love to see the dream ticket. I don't understand why Obama is so angry toward Hillary for suggesting it. Hillary didn't say who would be vice-president. She just mentioned that the dream ticket may be possible someday. This really makes Obama look bad to me. Also, Obama's telling Americans that he was opposed to NAFTA and then telling Canada that he didn't really mean what he said is double-speak.

E1944   March 10th, 2008 10:43 pm ET

Frequently John Edwards is mentioned as a possible running mate
on the Democratic ticket for VP. The no experience is a tag hung on
Senator Obama . John Edwards has one term as a US Senator. It
was unremarkable to say the least . Not once have I heard anyone questioned his experience when he was running for President
nor his experience as a possible VP who is a heartbeat away from the
Presidency. If Hillary is considering Barack as a prospective running
mate she is likely looking for someone without the high negatives
she has. Good choice but this is not a win win for Barack and he's
smart enough not to tarnish his career running as the VP on the
ticket with Hillary. I'm all for doing the right thing for the Democratic
Party but he would have to be out of his cotton picking skull to run
on any ticket with her or he can kiss his political career goodbye.

His message of change has resonated with our young people and
we(I'm 63) have done such a lousy job of choosing our elected
officials me thinks they could not possibly make any worse choices.
Some of us voice the opinion that they're too young but I think
just the opposite people. The age advantage( if it is an advantage)
is not working. Fresh ideas from our young people is not any more
or less important as our experience. The experience we have does not
give us any more advantages than the young with their new ideas.
And since they're paying for this mess our experienced elected officials have us in now we must have a new day. The time has come
for us to move over and allow the wonderful young people we have in
this country to fix the mess we have made.

Jamal Simmons on CNN   March 10th, 2008 10:41 pm ET

What are your credentials?

A Florida   March 10th, 2008 10:41 pm ET

Go Hillary!!! If she doesn't get in then McCain it is!!! No Obama BS

Michael   March 10th, 2008 10:40 pm ET

1) Hillary is playing the same game that Clinton played for years and was appreciated by African American folks who were misled to believe that Clintons are theri saviors. Clintons love themselves than anything else, not even this country.
2) When Obama is winning, suggesting him to be the Vice President also tells Hillary's superiority complex.
3) Hillary thinks that Obama is navive and he miserably needs a VP position that she is ready to offer.

Shame on the Clintons!

sharong   March 10th, 2008 10:40 pm ET

For PollyAnn:
If Barack Obama supporters are delusional, gee, there's a whole
lot of us! Majority rules!
And for those FEW of you who think he's arrogant, he ain"t got nothing
on Hillary . . . she invented the word.
Oh yea, she has 35 years of experience , , , serving tea to foreign dignitaries and going to foreign countries with her husband and
taking pictures of the place.
And for America the beautiful: Where did you get your information that
Barack Obama was involved in radical groups and criminal activiites?
Most of his adult like was spent in college (he has a Harvard Law degree) and in the politics? Are you saying politics is criminal activity? You spew the same BS as Hillary, no wonder you like her!
As for Michigan and Florida, let them have a "do over". A lot has changed since January, it may not turn out the way Hillary thinks it would. There votes should be counted. It isn't the voters fault that Hillary's friends decided to break the rules of the DNC. Another sneaky tactic of hers.

Henry   March 10th, 2008 10:40 pm ET

I am still trying to understand what her EXPERIENCE is. What did she do, what did she accomplish that is so significant ? Someone please tell me. Aside from knowing the layout of the White House, and where the "high priced" bedrooms are that were "rented out" to the highest bidder during the first Clinton presidency, just what is it that she brings on "Day One." Most of those foreign dignitaries that she hung out with are gone. If she did something that we don't know about then maybe it is time that they released those White House papers that may reveal something,..... oh, sorry, the Clinton archivists won't release anything..hmmmm, I wonder why. Furthermore, shame on Geraldine Ferraro who said that Obama is only doing as well as he is doing because he is Black. Shouldn't she be fired, or is being called a "monster" worse.

Obama Takes the Bait!   March 10th, 2008 10:40 pm ET

Obama just does not get it.

Chris in Orlando   March 10th, 2008 10:39 pm ET

I love how Obama pops junk about Washington... despite racing his whole political career to become one of them.

He was campaigning for Senate as a state lawmaker. He began campaigning for President before he even held a subcommittee hearing in Washington. OH WAIT, HE NEVER HELD ONE...

WTH?

Barack Obama knows something many of us are just starting to figure out: whites will vote for someone who they see as half-white. In the end, Obama has spent his life trying to snub whites, and using his mixed-heritage to advance along the ladder.

"This kind of gamesmanship, talking about me as VP but not ready for commander-in-chief, that's exactly the kind of doublespeak, double-talk that Washington is very good at," Obama added.

NEWSFLASH, GENIUS: YOU ARE ONE OF THEM. AND WITHOUT DOUBLE-RACE, YOU'D BE NOBODY.

Dot   March 10th, 2008 10:39 pm ET

Have any of the HRC supporters asked themselves why Rush Limbaugh and Anne Coulter want Hillary to win? Could it possibly be because they knoa that they have ammunition against her? Bill Bradley said as much on PBS. They knoa who donated money to build the Clinton library and they knoa about HRC's brother accepting money to ensure pardons. If yuo think she is any different than McBain, WAYSA?

TerryD   March 10th, 2008 10:38 pm ET

Barack Obama is the most puffed up self-centered person in

America and he is way to arrogant ; but as we will all remember that

HIS PRIDE CAME BEFORE HIS GREAT FALL.

Barack Obama get real, you have won only Red States that

Republicans will win in a nation election,

you have won only states where the majority of the voters are black.

And another thing Barack Obama should remember is that, Hillary R.

Clinton, the first female president in 2008, only suggested that he may

become her Vice-President .

And because of your arrogant response, your learning curve about the

ways of politics will take you an even longer time to be learn.

m.procope   March 10th, 2008 10:38 pm ET

The real news story is that Obama will ask Bill Clinton to be his Vice President.That is the winning strategy,and you can count on it.
Merv.

deep_eye   March 10th, 2008 10:38 pm ET

The clintons have made my flesh crawl since the 90s. By the way, was the rest of the country in suspended animation during those years? Am I the only one who seems to remember the scandals, bimbos, IMPEACHMENT, shady deals? Do we really want to go back there?
She is showing everyone what you will be experiencing if she is elected, so no crying later if she gets the nomination. Re the argument that Republicans want to face Obama – wake up, morons. They want to face Billary, McCain would pulverize her, they are terrified of Obama because they see a contest they cannot win. Every poll that I have read says something like 47-49% of the voters in America absolutely detest Billary, add in all of the other groups and it's McCain in a cakewalk.
Obama – '08 – '12 Thank God, somone with honesty, finally.................

Andrea   March 10th, 2008 10:38 pm ET

I used to like Hillary, then went to neutral and after her recent behavior its turned to DISLIKE! I watched a documentary about a week ago on Obama, I used to be ambivalent towards him, after watching the documentary I am convinced he is exactly what this country needs. All I ask is that he leaves dear old Hillary off his ticket.

dprichardson   March 10th, 2008 10:38 pm ET

I heve another comment as for the ny govener how long has the sexual desire be going on let us think at least since god created eve and now we make it our business to decide what is moral and what isn't for our country we should be worry out who is coming in and what we have going out before we worry about how's having sex and who is'nt . at this moment we have more companies leave herwe to go ove seas because of cheaper wages and cheaper isn't always better(toy recall) think what is more important our security and safty or who is sleepy with who?

President-to-be Obama   March 10th, 2008 10:37 pm ET

Carole in Canada, I don't know what your "USA ELECTION POLLS" source is, but based on your source and your comment one of two things is true:

1) You read the numbers backward
2) You are deliberately spreading lies

I have seen so much of lies and deceit posted on blogs and sent via forwarded emails this year it makes me sick. I really hope people do their own research and don't buy into this crap.

Carole, we really don't need foreigners trying to undermine our elections; certain candidates are doing enough of that as it is.

Keith   March 10th, 2008 10:37 pm ET

I got to give it to Hillary. She knows what she is doing, manipulating her way into winning Pennsylvania by having to constantly mention this ridiculous notion of a Clinton-Obama ticket. Will not happen. No way no how. Who knows what her view will be next week? They change faster than her moods. We've seen comical Hillary, misty-eyed Hillary, angry Hillary, crying Hillary, etc. At least Obama's views are consistent, plus he does not resort to "fear" in order to get his point across, case in point, that awful 3 a.m. TV ad with the little girl. Obama '08.

beachnan   March 10th, 2008 10:37 pm ET

I do not want Obama on the ticket at all. I don't think he has the experience to lead, and I think he is too arrogant to believe he should be in second position. If the Democrats ran their primaries, like the Republicans, and had a winner take all, Hillary would have 260 electoral votes to Obamas 190. The caucuses have been a joke, and his winning mostly "red" states also proves very little. When the big election comes, winning the big states with the most electoral votes is all that matters. We need a strong candidate who can win the big states. Hillary is the one has won the big states. Now Obama wants her to split the delegates from Florida when she was the clear winner and both their names were on the ballot. How arrogant?!!!! Clinton is the best choice, and as far as I am concerned, no Obama on the ticket at all, would be just fine.

Liban   March 10th, 2008 10:37 pm ET

Thinking analytically about this...

1) Clinton in november would never actually choose to have Obama as her running mate. It's all deception to get the support of the blind and undecided. But we know that already ^_^.

2) Obama would never accept it, even if she offered it. They wouldn't see eye to eye on things, and they don't exactly love each other.

3) This strategy makes her look like the "nice guy", or the compromiser, and Obama like the "mean guy", by him unwilling to make the same offer to her – he's obviously not into the deception business.

4) Bottom line: Don't get it twisted. A vote for Clinton is a vote for Clinton.

Butch   March 10th, 2008 10:37 pm ET

I've liked Obama from the start. My wife has been torn between the two. In this past week or two, Hillary has talked about experience that her and McCain have and Obama has only a speech. That statement slid my wife towards Obama, because of how insulting it was for all the people who support Obama, thanks Hillary. Now Hillary's talkin all this VP stuff. Are you kidding me? Dream ticket...dream on Hillary. If in some miracle you get the nod, my vote is McCain.

eddie   March 10th, 2008 10:36 pm ET

Hillary's prez, Barack's veep and Bill's back in the White House hangin' out with an intern smokin' cigars....... hmmmm

Bobby   March 10th, 2008 10:35 pm ET

NO NO NO!. Hillary, go home! No more Clintons. Obama has the lead and Hil is just desperate to latch onto this star.

keeping obama honest   March 10th, 2008 10:34 pm ET

why does obama's website show him wining nevada and texas? he lost both in terms of popular vote. seems like hes lying pretty blatentely on his website.

segun   March 10th, 2008 10:34 pm ET

how ironic how dubius and power hungry hillary will offer someone who you think is not ready and leading in delegate vp what a joke. shameless hillary do your math.

Elizabeth   March 10th, 2008 10:32 pm ET

Hey, CNN, why don't you post the story about what Clinton backer Geraldine Ferraro said today about Barack? Oh yeah, that's right, you're station has no courage.

Paul   March 10th, 2008 10:32 pm ET

She has less than one term in the Senate over Obama for experience. He's been in elected office four years longer than her. He has the kind of vision that she will never have. Oh yeah... and he's winning. I think we can safely bag the VP talk.

Obama '08

Dian Mo   March 10th, 2008 10:32 pm ET

Yes. The reason that Clinton benefited from so-called 'dream ticket' talk is that Obama responded in an elegant way, which reflects that he is inexperienced the politician.

The 'dream ticket' question brought out by CNN's Wolf Blitzer. Clinton did good reply and she put Obama in the VP position immediately in the interview. Obama only said that the 'dream ticket' is different comparing with his single ticket. Now, he is constantly emphasizing that he is running for the president and not for VP.

If Obama made his version of so-called 'dream ticket', the answer to this question could be different.

Alex   March 10th, 2008 10:32 pm ET

I hate this political gamesmanship on Hillary's part. She is causing the Democratic Party to turn on itself and become divided. The Republicans are laughing at us, because they have rallied behind McCain...while we spend millions on millions to try to win the nomination. I truly don't believe Hillary is in this for the "Greater Good" but for her "Greater Good." I hope we can rally behind one candidate soon, or we will hand over the Presidency to McCain over our petty politics.

Shawn   March 10th, 2008 10:32 pm ET

Hillary Clinton is one of the most self-serving conniving politicians that I have ever seen. If she wins the nomination, consider me an "ex-Democrat" !

Donald   March 10th, 2008 10:31 pm ET

Obama hurts himself and our country by running for President before he got experience. His and Hillary's ticketsare so similar, it pains me to see them destroy our party's chance to change the world. We know from history, when one runs for himself, what he wins is for himself. Successful Politics is about hope, new ideas, & our nation's future. Our country is so in need of unselfish people right now, we're almost bankrupt. The Iraq war harms us physically, emotionally, spiritiually, and financially. With the war and the economy together, we're really hurting. China, Muslins and many other former allies are preparing to dance in the streets. How can anyone put self above country–if Obama does not yield, McCain will keep us in Iraq for the next century.

Obama, please, don't be an opportunist when you can be so much more. Give our country and all of us a chance. Join Hillary. Be the
dream team.

keegan   March 10th, 2008 10:31 pm ET

The audacity of the Clinton's to even suggest something like this. She sure does benefit from it because what they really was suggesting was that they would be willing to take a back seat to him because they felt that they could eventually undermind his endeavours as President, Plus it would keep her in position for 2016 front runner position. They realize that they have no possible way of beating him so they are willing to settlte and wait. But you guys in the media are giving her hope when there really is none and making implications on her behalf. Oh The Audacity Of Hope.

Lbrte   March 10th, 2008 10:31 pm ET

When will everyone out there understand what the clinton's really are now? For the Hillary fans out there, are you beggining to understand who or what you are supporting. She is willing to make Obama her vice president. After all the effort her supporters have put into her campaign, the time involved typing your comments on your disapprovals for Obama. She wants to now put him on the ticket with her. I hope all of you can now understand how wishy washy she really is. Hillary has proven herself to be the person Obama supporters have tried to make you understand all along. Do what ever it takes to win, even if it means letting down her own supporters. She ( Hillary) will go to any extreme level to try and win. She has just solidified the reason why I am for Obama.I see Obama as the one with consistancy, good judgement, unwavering, and committed to his country and all people. what he says is what he means, bottom line. I trust Obama to make the right choices for America.

Kathy   March 10th, 2008 10:31 pm ET

Good Idea for Clinton/Obama, not the other way around.
Experience is knowledge and better results.

American living in Canada   March 10th, 2008 10:31 pm ET

America the Beautiful: don't be so naive!!! It's Hillary and her husband who have the criminal activity in their pasts!! Obama has never been convicted of any criminal activity or affiliated with any radical groups. Get your facts straight!!!

Obama 08!!

BNS   March 10th, 2008 10:30 pm ET

People need to read the NYT article on Obama's record in Congress. They also have to read the article on Obama's record in the Illinois legislature.

After that, if they still think Obama is the person to lead this country, then they need to seek out a good shrink and see him/her at least once a week for the next 4 years.

If Obama is actually elected, then they will need to increase their visits to twice a week.

dprichardson   March 10th, 2008 10:30 pm ET

i truely don't think either one would make a wonderful prseident but if worst comes to worst i'd rather it be hillary thom obama i believe we will be in for trouble we haven't ever seen if he gets into the white house

NC   March 10th, 2008 10:29 pm ET

Please remember hillary is doing because the media has sold the idea that her supporters are uneducated. That means this is something they would fall for but the Obama supporters or people with a hint of decency would not.

NYC, NY, New Yorker   March 10th, 2008 10:29 pm ET

C. Wilson
I second that

Go Clinton/Powell'08

Sheila   March 10th, 2008 10:29 pm ET

Can Hillary supporters get any more negative? She is behind in the popular vote, the delegate vote and states won..What audacity that any of you would expect a front runner to agree to a deal to be VP. Would you expect Obama to do that had Hillary been front runner? Sorry Hillary supporters, like it or not, if Hillary wins the nomination, she will need every Obama supporter vote she can get.. This isn't a very good way to unite the party..If anything, it's destroying the party..Maybe that is the plan?

Jeanne   March 10th, 2008 10:28 pm ET

Obama could only wish he could have a mentor like Hillary. I wish she would quit talking about him being her VP. I want her to win the nomination, but I don't want him involved in her administration at all. I know she is just trying to be nice, but the longer this goes on, the less I like him and the more you see his many faces. He needs to just sit back and watch the process for a few years...well, 8 of Hillary's presidency.

hilarious   March 10th, 2008 10:28 pm ET

hillary acts as if the presidency is her birthright. and what is the whole point of that 3AM ad? what is she doing answering calls? shouldn't she be working? we need a president, not a receptionist.

Coline   March 10th, 2008 10:28 pm ET

No, I don't think it helps her. I think that Americans have seen how fake she is and realize that she is just doing what she cans to win. She is playing the dirty politics game. Obama on the other hand isn't going for it. There is a video of him responding to that "dream ticket" idea that is floatin around. Watching the video clears everything up, and everything he says is very true!

Tom Overberg   March 10th, 2008 10:27 pm ET

Watching Anderson cooper- Again CNN fails to tell the world that the NY goveror is a Democrate. Another exampleof double standards in the media. Why CNN is is not D for Democrate behild the name of the NY govenor?

Amanda   March 10th, 2008 10:27 pm ET

This idea nauseates me! Why can't Clinton attempt to win on her own merits and not game playing and cheating to win? Doesn't she have any pride? Her behavior is becoming downright despicable!
How anyone can support her is beyond me...

Jeff   March 10th, 2008 10:27 pm ET

If Barack Obama were to somehow, miraculously not win the nomination and decide to be Clinton's runningmate, his presence would offset a portion of the extra Republicans who would turn out of Election Day.

The Dream Ticket is the one poll after poll keeps showing will trounce John McCain. Its the Obama / NotClinton ticket.

Vote for the frontrunner with 11 years of experience, not the divider with 7 years. Vote for Barack Obama!

Truth   March 10th, 2008 10:26 pm ET

For all you Hillary cronies Obama is 46 even if for some odd reason he doesn't get the nod he can run on his own again in 4 or 8 years without being VP he doesn't need Hillary.

bond   March 10th, 2008 10:26 pm ET

Scoreboard Obama

Paul   March 10th, 2008 10:26 pm ET

Hillary has basically already lost. Like Huckabee did , she needs a miracle. Hillary supporters should save there breath and go do the math, that is if you know how. You will be greatly disapointed. Even with Michigan and Florida she is finished for the most part.

YOU LOST, take it like a woman, or man, whatever you are.

Wicca Rich   March 10th, 2008 10:26 pm ET

I am a white man 37 years old who is registerd as a independent, but I tend to vote republican.
This will be the first time I have ever voted for a democrat.
But this so called dream ticket whos dream is it?
Not my dream more like a night mare.
If Hillary wins the democratic nomination thin I will vote for McCain.
If Obama wins and he puts Hillary as his VP thin I will vote for McCain.
I didn't vote for the Clintons the first time thay ran and I will not vote thim back in.
Right now my vote is going to Barack Obama but if he goes for this dream ticket that will change.

Todd Coulter   March 10th, 2008 10:26 pm ET

CNN= Clinton News Network

Phillivethedream   March 10th, 2008 10:25 pm ET

Wow! If she is'nt as slick as old slick Willie; might even be where he got his slickness from. I mean good lord. They, Hillary & Bill know that they have lost. Keep in mind, "The Clinton Machine"! A system by the Clintons to WIN at all cost, by any means. So because they can't win the White House out right, because america has said no, now they come up with the ideal to force Obama to put her on his ticket. They know what they're doing. Just the right amount of pressure and then Obama has to make the call. Yes or no to Hillary on his ticket. Well I for one say hell 2 tha nawl!!! The Clintons are way too power hungry to be that close (Vp Hillary) to just stop there. They would not stop until they win. Got to put em down. Leave no option or no way. Send the Clintons home, and invite them to visit the White House.

Jackie   March 10th, 2008 10:25 pm ET

Why does CNN continue to suggest that Hillary Clinton "won" Florida and Michigan? For once and for all, the DNC has not recognized the primaries in either state. Therefore, there was no winner. CNNs job is to report the news, not manufacture it. It is clear that your coverage of this affair is one-sided and driven by the Clinton machine. This will be a moot point when Senator Obama wins the Democratic nomination. So stop the double speak, and stick to your journalistic role!

Bill   March 10th, 2008 10:24 pm ET

Being a Vice President is akin to being the backup Quarterback on a NFL football team. Can you name the backup QB of your favorite team?

VOTER FOR TRUTH AND DIGNITY IN AMERICA   March 10th, 2008 10:24 pm ET

Of course Hillary benefits from this ploy. Hillary knows she is
losing this race and, I believe, that She and Bill dream up these
plans to do whatever it will take to win. It is a known fact that the
Clintons think, 'hey will not lose, or that losing this race is NOT
an option. Therefore, anything goes.

Bill announced this weekend during his campaigning for Hillary,
that A Clinton/Obama ticket would be "unstoppable". That may
be true, but I believe that the trick is to get Hillary the nomination
by playing on peoples emotions, that the Great American people
will think they are doing a good thing by voting for Hillary would
be voting for Obama, too. The problem with that plan, it is a win
win situation for Hillary. That does not necessarily guarantee
the American people that she will choose Obama in the end.
And certainly does not guarantee that Obama would even ever
want to be Vice Pres. under such an unscrupulous couple.

Hillary blames others for all of her problems and who is to say
should Obama ever be V.P, under her, that she wouldn't blame
him if things would go wrong for her.

In all actuality, Obama is a very wise and smart man. Too smart
for the Clinton's I think he has them all figured out. Something
the Clinton's never counted on.

OBAMA 2008 for Pres. Never V.P. under Hillary and Bill.

s.positive   March 10th, 2008 10:24 pm ET

Clinton spinning...

marge   March 10th, 2008 10:23 pm ET

Personally, I think that the Democratic Party will NOT win the nomination if Obama is the nominee. Many many people will vote for McCain if Obama is the nominee because of too many scandals and past involvments with radical groups and criminal activity. I think that the Clintons know how Obama will be attacked and are actually trying to protect him.

This is a blessing that President Clinton would suggest this idea.

Ignorance IS NOT BLISS...its just Ignorance!!!!!! I KNOW the dems will not win if Hillary is the nominee EITHER!!!!! I know many people that will just stay at home....The DNC knows this too!!!!!

alice2   March 10th, 2008 10:23 pm ET

Clinton is behind and wants to make people think that she is the front runner and therefore will probable win, so vote for her and she will let Barack be on the ticket as VP. I don't think that will happen. If she does get it, the Republicans will bring out all the dirt on her during the White House years. Bill's sex scandel, Watergate, the way he (Bill) lied to the American people, also there is more corruption that has happened since they left the White House. People did not like the Clinton's when they left the White House. They wanted them OUT, (tried to impeach him) and do not want them back again. Hilary is not trustworthy, too many lies. She needs to turn in her tax returns, and also documents about her accomplishments, her 35 years experience especially the foreign affairs experience. (What a joke) My vote goes to BARACK OBAMA, Change we can believe in.

Darryl2   March 10th, 2008 10:22 pm ET

I have to give Mrs. Clinton credit for such a well thought out tactic. I have already voted for Mrs. Clinton. However, I would give the world to go back and change my vote now that her true colors are showing.

This is underhanded politics at its best. It is quite apparent to the well informed and educated voter what she is doing. However, what we are overlooking is how does this resonate with the misinformed and under-educated.

My point is there is a bit of prejudice and stereotyping being done here. Hillary is banking on the average African-American voter not being well educated. These comments are merely a tactic to either (1) swing the African-American vote her way or (most probably) keep the African American voter from turing out to vote for Mr. Obama.

Rumors build in the under-educated portions of the population. That segment of the population does not turn to CNN or read the Political sections of the newpaper on a frequent basis. Mrs. Clinton's statements could easily translate into rumors that Mr. Obama is running as Vice President with Mrs. Clinton. Therefore, a large segment of the "targeted" voters will not show up for future Democratic Primaries and Caucuses.

Don't get me wrong. I do not believe this tactic will work as the African-American population is more intelligent than many in the Political arena believes. Mrs. Clinton, please campaign on the issues and what is best for this country and leave the negative and sneaky politics out of this.

This is a message from a once avid Hillary Clinton supporter.

Enrique   March 10th, 2008 10:22 pm ET

It's the spring of 2002. It's 3am and the red phone is ringing in Hillary's house. It's George W. Bush. They conference John McCain. The three of them agree that the US should invade Iraq.

David Murphy   March 10th, 2008 10:22 pm ET

Oh, so if Barack's a good boy he can be Hillary & Bill's VP? Hahahahaha! Guess what Hillary? The whole world is watching and we're not going to have democracy hijacked this time around.

Dee   March 10th, 2008 10:22 pm ET

Hillary is open to the possibility of having Obama as her VP should she win. That isnt ASKING Barack, that is called speculating. Obama is NOT open to this idea should he lose. So Obama supporters...who is divise now? Double-speak indeed...he IS the King of it!

As far as his 'if I'm good enough for VP, I am good enough for President' crap, well..thats not what Clinton is saying: she is saying that should she have to step down as President someday, better Obama in charge, inexperienced as he is, than McCain, mini-Bush that he is.

Typical Obama sheister-talk...he is finally showing his true colors...

jo.c   March 10th, 2008 10:20 pm ET

Hillary Clinton is the next President. It is important for everyone to understand that this is where things will land. She does not need Obama. Obama needs Obama; Obama will only serve Obama. He is on an Obama trip. Obviously, he has a lot joining in on his trip. This is a serious matter; that someone that no one knew 6 months ago now thinks he is very popular. What gives?

Ted   March 10th, 2008 10:20 pm ET

Yes Canada is for Obama in the hope of a safer world.

Ana   March 10th, 2008 10:19 pm ET

The more I read and hear Obama supporters, the more I realize how fanatic they are, and it is scary. They sound like the far right that gave us Bush and Cheney. They are so unwilling to yield and compromise. the only difference between fanatic ultra right wingers and these Obama supporters is that they are on the other side–ultra left wingers. What happens to the early media reports that said that the Obama supporters were highly educated? Educated people bring reason, knowledge and logic to the argument–these people blogging here just "spit" insults and complaints. A note: If the goal is for the Democrats to win the White House, we must win in Florida and Ohio, which Senator Clinton won by a good margin. Senator Obama has won many small states that never vote Democrat in the general election. (Also, many republican voted for Obama this time, but they will vote for McCain in November–do not fooled). As to why Senator would be best fitted for VP– He should gain the experience needed to be a great president later.

NancyD   March 10th, 2008 10:19 pm ET

Oregon Voter,

If you read more, you will find out that Obama is in the lead – in both delegates and popular vote...if he's winning, and Clinton is NOT winning, why would he consider being VP? When he is in the LEAD for the presidential nomination?

Kentucky   March 10th, 2008 10:19 pm ET

The truth of the matter is that although Obama would be a very good president is not the reason we are all voting for him, its because no one can stand THE CLINTONS!!!!!! The country is more intelligent that what we were 20 years ago. NO MORE CLINTONS!!!! We tried to impeach the last one.

marge   March 10th, 2008 10:19 pm ET

OMG!!!!! Clinton supporters should be hanging their heads in shame!!!! LOL!LOL!
Hillary isn't in any position to be talking about her VP....LOL!LOL!LOL!
For those of you that don't want hill to be Obama on her ticket...LOL!LOL! Don't Fret...LOL!LOL!
Hillary's isn't going to have a ticket!!!!!! LOL!LOL!LOL!

Mary   March 10th, 2008 10:19 pm ET

For everyone out there that thinks being first lady for eight year means nothing as experience it would help if you would check with other first ladies and the ones that are deceased check on what they accompolished when they were first lady.
Hillary Clinton, Nancy Reagan, Barbara Bush, Lady Bird Johnson, Jacquline Kennedy, Mayne Eisenhower, Laura Bush and Roselyn Carter and many more first ladies could be mentioned. These ladies were all very worthy of their service to the country.

I doubt there is a world leader who doesn't identify with Hillary Clinton.

William   March 10th, 2008 10:18 pm ET

If this isn't the best evidence that Hillary is divisive and would be divisive to this country – which is exactly what this country doesn't need – I don't know what is.

It is the ultimate in arrogance and insensitivity to tell a competitor they could be a good second in command to them.

It's also the ultimate in bad judgement.

She is proving that she is not qualified to be president. America needs to pay attention.

Kimberly   March 10th, 2008 10:17 pm ET

I haven't read any comments yet but I'll bet the "Obama Cult Members" are at it again. .....Okay I read a few of their evil remarks... I was right. Do these "Cult Members" work? Are they out to destroy our country? ...the World?

I Used To Love her, PA   March 10th, 2008 10:17 pm ET

If anything, as a former fence sitter leaning towards Hillary, now I know Hillary can't be trusted. if you align her Hillary/Obama ticket with what she was saying last week in regards to Obama's experience, now its evident that shes just an empty suit, who lives and dies by the polls. Shes the type of person that has to look at a poll before she makes a decision. That was evident in her vote to go to war in Iraq and i think its evident here, in her "proclomation" to make Obama VP. Its ridiculous, she has an outside chance, at best. So her asking Obama to be VP is completely ludicrous.

Sorry Hillary. You lost my vote and my support.

Kim, Los Angeles, CA   March 10th, 2008 10:17 pm ET

HILLARY BENEFITS. THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY BENEFITS.
AMERICA BENEFITS. WE COULD HAVE 16 YEARS OF DEMS IN CHARGE AT THE WHITE HOUSE,

Andrew   March 10th, 2008 10:17 pm ET

i have noticed that people seem to be fairly negative to Hillary for no appernt reason other then the fact that she was part of the 'horrible' 90's. i am not saying i voted for her or that i didn't vote for her it is just dissapointing to see people jump to conclusions. i do beleive Obama will bring change to politics- he already has short term wise, by revamping the Democratic Primary. however i do not beleive he can change politics for long term. Go as far back in history you want-FDR, Washington, Scipio, Pericles, even to the Sumerian empire with the election of the Ensi and Lugal; its all the same politics sling mud, make false images, and make promises they can't keep. I am not trying to be cynical but in running for any office all you can really offer is your word, and make sure that the other person won't keep his. Besides the Primary is not about the people it is about the party. This is not a general election. It is fallacy to think that the person with the most popular votes should win by default. Let the party deceide between Hillary and Obama for which one would benefit the party the most and be able to win among Dems, Reps, and Ind.

C00Smith   March 10th, 2008 10:16 pm ET

I used to think Hillary had simply been immersed in politics for so long that she couldn't understand that this kind of political posturing and gamesmanship, rather than Republican dirty tricks, was the reason she was so disliked. I have come to think that she actually understands it all quite well. She is perfectly happy with her small inner circle of friends and advisers who admire this kind of behavior. The public just exists to be manipulated and made a fool of. She is an excellent politician; not such a great person.

To Joanna   March 10th, 2008 10:16 pm ET

Obama not only leads by over 150 delegates but also over 600.000 popular votes. No way for Clinton supporters to spin these numbers, they are losing, period.

Lisa   March 10th, 2008 10:16 pm ET

Why is the standard line that Clinton won Texas? Once both primary and caucus votes were counted, Obama netted 99 delegates to Clinton's 94. Hmm, that sounds like an Obama win.

La Raza   March 10th, 2008 10:16 pm ET

Irritated in Cali

Si se puede. Hillary needs Obama, Obama does not need Hillary my friend. I mean my punk friend.

OBAMA 08!!!   March 10th, 2008 10:15 pm ET

No to Hillary...Yes to Edwards as VP and CNN's John King is HOT!

Lisa   March 10th, 2008 10:14 pm ET

Once again you people have to have something to complain about at this point you want the democrats to get back into the white house then you fuss about him and complain about her it does not matter which one is the head or tale as long as it one or the other.and if it don't go your way about whichever one your voting for you are going to vote for mcclain go ahead 99.9% of you probably voted republican anyway and now you are feeling the stiffness just as everyone else or more so,now you say you will vote for mcclain it really don't make a difference until it 's on paper and mcclain gets in there and thats a very big IF now . and the only thing we all will have to do is shall out is more money except if you are rich as cream,so to tell you the truth I'm really tired of hearing and reading all of this stuff and they obama and hillary fighting each other,and the republicains are loving this kind of media fighting it's so sad that neither will have enough delgates by august it will come down to the superdelgates to pick then thats another problem as well ,so who is standing on the side of UNITED WE STAND? DIVIDED WE FALL? this is what the democratic side has done it's time for UNITY,people get real.

John, Brookline, MA   March 10th, 2008 10:14 pm ET

Hillary and the talk of Obama as a vice presidential candidate reminds me of the Bolsheviks and the Menshiviks. 'Bolshevik' means majority, and 'Menshivik' minority. The Bolsheviks were the minority, but called themselves the majority, and the majority let them get away with it, There is Hillary, like the Lenin, like the Bush administration, creating her own reality. Keep point out that she is losing, Barack.

Bertha - old democrat   March 10th, 2008 10:14 pm ET

March 10th, 2008 6:50 pm ET
Joanne said it so much better than I can.
So, I quote her:

"A perfect case for cynicism! Human conduct is wholly motivated by self-interest. Obama, without a political trail by which the measure of the man may be taken is just an opportunist , politicians of his caliber are a dime a dozen, witness today's news on New York's governor. Nonetheless, those so easily fooled by politicians will keep on swallowing the bs handed out. Once these people are in office, they do whatever darn they please….thanks to those voters who put them in office who lacked the tools by which to analyze the candidates."

VA   March 10th, 2008 10:14 pm ET

THIS COMMENT IS FOR THE PERSON THAT SAID OBAMA IS WHINING ABOUT FLORIDA/MICHIGAN..I BELIEVE THAT YOU HAVE THAT BACKWARDS...HILLARY IS DOING THE WHINING...OBAMA HAS SAID THAT HE WOULD ABIDE BY WHAT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY SAYS....FLORIDA POPULATION....17,789,864...TOTAL PEOPLE THAT VOTED.....1,684,390
MICHIGAN POPULATION....9,938,444..VOTERS...593,837
I KNOW THAT IF MY STATE THOUGHT THEY HAD TO HAVE THE FIRST SAY AND WE KNEW ALL ALONG THAT OUR VOTES WOULD NOT COUNT..I KNOW I WOULD NOT BOTHER VOTING.. FOR PEOPLE TO THINK THAT THE DEMOCRATS WOULD JUST LET IT SLIDE AND COUNT IS STUPIDITY...OF COURSE THEY HAVE TO COME UP WITH A FAIR PLAN......I AM BETTING ALOT MORE WILL VOTE AND THE STATISTICS WILL BE QUITE DIFFERENT OVERALL.

Mike   March 10th, 2008 10:13 pm ET

It's a little more complicated than what Obama is saying. Yes, he is in the lead with delegates and states (popular vote is virtually tied), but its not always about who the best candidate is, but its also about who will win the presidency. Remeber, winning the democratic primary doesn't guarantee the presidency, there's a whole half of the country that has to decide as well.

Yes, Obama is leading in polls against McCain, but that is just a snapshot of things to come. I truly believ that given time for the Republicans to hone their attack, Obama has a lot that's yet to be revealed. He has so much running against him, and I can see a lot of democrats, especially Clinton supporters, defecting to McCain's side, especially if the democratic position doesn't get resolved soon.

But it is important to note that Obama seems overconfident to the point of arrogance. If he doesn't take this "deal," and ends up losing the nomination, he will be seen as an extremely divisive figure that hastened the democratic process and gave the republicans a lot of ammunition. There's a good chance that if that situation occurs, and Hillary doesn't pick him as the nominee, he could very well be finished in politics.

He needs to be objective, take things into consideration, and come up with a valid, well thought out decision on this. That's the sign of a good leader that is concerned about what's best for our country, not one that's out to win a race and has his own best interests in mind.

As for delusional comments: Not being able to name Obama's accomplishments but still supporting him is delusional. Cheering loudly while he blows his nose is delusional. Handing over a child for him to kiss while sick is delusional. Seeing huge partisanship when it comes to his supporters is delusional. Ignoring controversies without even considering them or self-educating on them is delusional.

People, do some true, unbiased research on Obama. Really look at him, his actions, and his professional history. Ignore the "messages of hope and change," and seek out substance. Look at his voting records, and people he's worked with. There's no way you'd vote for him if you did that. Try naming five things about him you DON'T like. If you can't do that, you are delusional. Don't be blind.

simple thought ?   March 10th, 2008 10:13 pm ET

EXSPERINCE, without it we are confused.

Robin   March 10th, 2008 10:12 pm ET

Obama has said it all! He wants no part of their outfit and I do not blame him. He is ahead and has popular vote. Why should he settle? Hillary Clinton just cannot deal with the fact that she is no longer top dog. It is she who should ask that is beg for the # 2 spot!

ahna   March 10th, 2008 10:12 pm ET

YOU 'VE GOT TO BE KIDDING!!!!!!!!

Ken Wright, Portland, OR.   March 10th, 2008 10:12 pm ET

The height audacity! The height of arrogance!

The height of overconfidence! The height of self-importance!

Hillary is no dream for Senator Obama to have on a ticket!

Hillary is no dream for the Democrats to have on a ticket.

She and Bill are tearing the party apart.

Hillary is no dream on a ticket because you get Bill with her.

Those two politicians with the least amount of veracity in politics do not, with anyone, a dream ticket make.

Even though I won’t vote for you because of the mess the party is in, with that Screamer Howard Dean at the helm, and no clear cut resolution to hold to the party rules to keep the unseated Michigan and Florida delegates off of the convention floor, I believe, Senator Obama is head and shoulders the better candidate.

Disorganization and incompetence produce my resolve that no Democrat candidate gets my vote.

I’m disgusted with the shenanigans.

noemi   March 10th, 2008 10:12 pm ET

To answer the title of this article the answer is yes, Hillary benefits from it because she is trying to unite and Obama is being arrogant on the eve of MS primary.

MS please see who he really is before you vote for him!

Ron   March 10th, 2008 10:11 pm ET

This entire situation is ridicous. If Obama was behind in delegates like Clinton, he would be talked about more neagatively. It's about DOI me standards, race and ignorance. Sen. Clinton isn't the type of person I would vote for in any situation. Now that I know how she works! Unfortunately there are many voters who have the same mindset as he Clintons. Nothing will change and people will continue to complain about the same people they keep electing.

jujub   March 10th, 2008 10:11 pm ET

I can't believe this…why on earth would Barack Obama want to be within 100 feet of Hillary Clinton any time in the future?

She has spent months bashing his his religion (he's Christian not Muslim), his Church (what about the priests who abused children folks or McCain's buddy who is an Anti-Semite), his patriotism (he was singing the National Anthem not saying the Pledge of Allegiance), his drug use (fully disclosed in a book he wrote years ago), his middle name (means Beautiful not Terrorist) ; his voting "present" as an Illinois Senator (something that is a political vote, not an absentee vote), his experience (he has 3 more years in an elected judicial position), his position of NAFTA (his other book wrote of his position and the Clintons did the wink wink to Canada), his Senate bills and record (far more substantive bills and resolutions than HRC); his absence after his announced his presidency (she has voted less than him and has also been absent); his purported plagiarism (while she plagiarizes his words); his lead in the race for the nomination (she is behind folks)….need I say more. Hillary: You and your supporters are truly delusional.

Ethel   March 10th, 2008 10:11 pm ET

What is this? Only accepting comments from Obama supporters? You're only displaying comments condemning and ridiculing Hillary and Bill Clinton? That's been done before, and it did not succeed, and the voters will speak for themselves. We don't need help making our decision who to vote for.

To America the Beautiful   March 10th, 2008 10:11 pm ET

America the Beautiful

Where did you learn math, George Bush?

Even if Hillary got all of Michigan and Florida's delegates she still wouldn't win the nomination. In fact if she wan 100% of Michigan and Florida delegates she would still be over 600 delegates short of the magic number.

She currently needs an average of 60% of the remaining state delegates and superdelegates the rest of the way, even if you include Michigan and Florida. The magic number of delegates is 2025 without Michigan and Florida and 2208 if Michigan and Florida end up revoting. Do your research before spouting your mouth off.

Democrat in Houston   March 10th, 2008 10:11 pm ET

Go Hillary!!!!....THE SMART CHOICE FOR ALL AMERICANS

Gerry - former republican   March 10th, 2008 10:11 pm ET

Brian – Trinidad is righit.

Clinton is interested in the Democrates winning the White House.

Obama is interested in Obama getting the nomination.

Go Hillary!

Pia   March 10th, 2008 10:11 pm ET

Charlotte,
I can see you are still delusional that your gal Hillary can win. I'm so sorry you have been brainwashed or as Obama put it today in Miss. ,'bamboozled' by the Clintons. There is hope, though, you can always get de-programmed.

noemi   March 10th, 2008 10:10 pm ET

Jay – are you serious Obama would pick up CA & Texas! Have you not read the results on who they voted for Hillary!

Wake up and see who won those states. If Hillary is not the nominee her supporters would run to McCain as well as vice versa!

They both need each other and whoever is on top it will keep the party united! This is the real test to see if Obama is a uniter any other VP would not unite the party or country.

Get real please!

Tricia   March 10th, 2008 10:10 pm ET

Hmm...didn't Eliot Spitzer make a big deal during his campaign about what he was going to do in office starting on day one too?

p denton   March 10th, 2008 10:10 pm ET

The Clinton/ Obama ticket works for me-pd

Drew   March 10th, 2008 10:10 pm ET

You idiots who keep calling Obama supporters "delusional" and "crazy", or even a "cult", need to shut up and watch as the YOUTH change America. I am tired of listening to middle-aged white women rant about Hillary and her so-called "experience" when they really know nothing about her. Its the same thing over and over: "she's got the experience and the solutions to be the commander in chief." Ha. Get a clue. She is once again deceiving all of you as she has done many times before. She is a liar, a cheater, and a crybaby. I will not be called an ignorant "punk" and a "delusional" young voter by these arrogant older people. Look you've had your chance but your generation has put this country into such a big mess that it will be very hard to get out of. This is not a cult, this is excitement. Why? Because somebody who represents US is here, and that somebody is Barack Obama. Before you criticize this man, do your research. Read his book. Watch his documentary. You will find that he is a great American, and his life has not been nearly as littered with controversy and lies as Hillary Rodham Clinton's.
Obama-AnybodybutHillary '08

Lee   March 10th, 2008 10:09 pm ET

This article contains an error in the statement: "But following Clinton's wins in Texas, Ohio, and Rhode Island last week — a trifecta of victories that essentially salvaged her presidential hopes." It now appears that after the caucus votes are added in, Barack Obama won Texas. This fact needs to get more attention.

Mary   March 10th, 2008 10:09 pm ET

@Brian

HILLARY hurt the party by running, period. The country doesn't need a redux of the scandal-plagued Clinton years.

VA   March 10th, 2008 10:08 pm ET

Hillary is one of the most corrupt politicians of our time. If she's on the ticket, I'm voting for Nader. Obama is our best hope for uniting this country, His experience is real – not like Hillary's – he wasn't just married to the president or governor of Arkansas for 16 years

Will   March 10th, 2008 10:08 pm ET

Why does the mainstream media continue to perpetuate the illusion that somehow Hillary Clinton still has a shot at securing the Democratic nomination?

WE AREN'T BUYING IT SO STOP SELLING.

Once again the media will sell out its integrity for the sake of ratings and trivial non-stories that are positioned as facts and real news.

Obama   March 10th, 2008 10:07 pm ET

"My name is Barack Obama, and, as you may have heard, I’m running for
President.

I would like to speak today about Michigan and Florida.

I want to take you all back to last New Year’s Eve in Iowa. I said to folks
then that Al Gore lost in 2000 because he was a divisive candidate. His way
, I say to you, was the politics of the past.

Al Gore wanted every vote in Florida counted. I say to you, that’s the
politics of the past.

And now, in 2008, Hillary Clinton wants the January vote in Michigan and
Florida counted. That’s the politics of the past.

If they can’t be counted, she says, there should be a re-vote in new
primaries. With secret ballots. And no on-site campaigning. The politics of
the past.

She wants all police officers to have the chance to vote. All the
firefighters. All the nurses and factory workers and supermarket cashiers.
All the young parents and handicapped and elderly.

Definitely the politics of the past.

Now I say we can have a re-vote. Certainly.

In a caucus.

A caucus. Where we can postpone voting until we sway all those not with us.
Yes, we can.

A caucus. Where we can bully and intimidate all those not with us. Call them
racists and bigots until they change their minds. Yes, we can.

A caucus. Where we can lock out all those not with us and vote without them.
Yes, we can.

A caucus. Something we can have to ourselves.

Yes, we can.

We are the ones we’ve been waiting for.

kmiller   March 10th, 2008 10:07 pm ET

NO WAY !!! Obama should connect himself with the Clintons.

He should not sully himslf with thier con acts.

The only ticket needed is one way back to NY.

scary scary stuff to think they can geta free ride from Obama.

Get real folks !! We really dont need this kind of BS when it comes down to doing business with other countrys.

person   March 10th, 2008 10:07 pm ET

Well, does experience as a First Lady count? Clinton supporters, name one time when Hillary Clinton responded to a moment of crisis like 9/11? If she is making that argument, then only one person can be and should be president again–good old George Bush! Also, although the U.S. economy was better when Bill was pres., Bill Clinton did not have to deal with an economy in recession. Any candidate who becomes president will have to deal with an economy in recession, the exorbitant costs of a prolonged and unnecessary war, a huge debt, a weakening dollar, and with an America that has lost its reputation for the virtues that we celebrate as part of our Constitution. So, we need a professor of Constitutional Law, a great speechmaker, and a person who can gather all of the help we can get from the Republican and Democratic party in order to turn this country around. Guess who? Barack Obama. By the way, when a talented basketball player joins the NBA, he might play better than older, veteran basketball players simply because of his talent. Barack Obama may not have the same experience as Hillary Clinton, but he has enormous talent–which would last the two terms he will be President after he wins the 2008 election.

Kinkan   March 10th, 2008 10:07 pm ET

Dear everybody, don't be fooled by the way the Clintons playing this game. It's one of many they have been trying to trick our mind. If you're smart enough you see immediately what they're doing. We know what we need for the next leader, don't we?

noemi   March 10th, 2008 10:07 pm ET

all I read is Obama is in the lead, Obama is # 1, yet he has not been able to win 1 big state. How is he going to win the election if he can't win CA, NY, NJ, Ohio, Texas or even Florida!

Please people get some reasoning behind your Obama fever! Take a look at who he really is before you annointed him the savor of America.

How much has he done for America besides preach and preach about change and a new way of doing things!

Put America first and not your hatred of the Clintons who by the way already provided on their promises = peace and prosperity!!!!

AnneinPA   March 10th, 2008 10:05 pm ET

Where or when has Obama said directly " I will not be the Vice Presidential candidate?" He hasn't ! I have to laugh at Hillary's boldness and challenge. With neither one able to get to the magic
number 2025, if he refuses to unite the Democrats with a joint ticket
he looks like a divider not a uniter.

Hillary '08!!!!!!!!!!

Jay   March 10th, 2008 10:04 pm ET

All the people who will vote for McCain if they don't get their precious (that's a laugh) Hillary don't deserve to have a Democrat in the White House anyways.

Christine   March 10th, 2008 10:03 pm ET

She is just trying to unite the democratic party. And she isn't far behind in the race. She will get Pennsylvania which has much more delegates than Mississippi. Don't forget, she won Ohio, and there hasn't been a democratic nominee elected for president that didn't win Ohio in the primaries in over 100 years. I will not vote for Obama if he becomes the nominee.

HILLARY '08

Mary   March 10th, 2008 10:03 pm ET

Mississippi. please consider Hillary when you cast your vote Tuesday. We belive that Hillary would be a great President for all of America.

kevin   March 10th, 2008 10:02 pm ET

Sorry this might be the wrong forum for this but I can not seem to get a response from CNN, so I guess I have to blog it. Obama leads Clinton 1,347 to 1,200 in pledged delagates according to the summary page of CNN's political ticker. However, if you go into each state individually on the site his lead in pledged delegates is only 1,287 to 1,172. In other words, Obama leads Clinton by 115 pledged delegates instead of the 147 being reported, which amounts to a 28% overstatement. I sent CNN an e-mail offering to send my Excel adding up their State by State numbers but they only auto responded to me. I'm not saying that this is some vast conspiracy, but come on CNN your numbers should add up.

Sue   March 10th, 2008 10:00 pm ET

Maybe Hilliary has already set her sight on Elliot Spitzer's position as Governor of NY!

JCH   March 10th, 2008 10:00 pm ET

Why are Obama supporter so angry, vicious and cynical??? What happened to the talk that these are both good candidates, and we would be happy with either??? I feel that the moveon.org liberals are wratching up the nasty rhetoric against a woman (such as calling her a "monster"), whom only a year ago supported and four years ago begged to run against Bush, and it is REALLY turning off moderate, normal dems. After all, isn't the guy their supporting supposed to be about getting past negative, divisive politics. The more that liberals take this scorched-earth approach against one of their own; the more and more I think that Senator McCain (who seems to be a moderate and a good man) wouldn't be a bad choise in November if, at a minimum, as a way to put it back in the face of these ultra liberals hijacking our party.

denise   March 10th, 2008 9:59 pm ET

Matt–Obama has just as much experience or more than Bill Clinton. Besides, anyone who teams up with the Clinton's are ruined forever. Any politician who owes the Clinton's favors can never pay them back. It is best to stay away from them.

Brian of florida   March 10th, 2008 9:59 pm ET

It dont matter who is running as what or who is on top.They are both enemies of america.All of you loud mouth libs better watch yourselves.I know you think your views are the views of all americans about these clowns because of the liberal media.But understand this there are many of us who will never accept or swear allegience to either of these traitors.We hear you talk of acceptance and free speech but you supress any you disagree with.It is on your head libs what is comming if you elect either of them.We will not let you hide behind democracy in order to subvert it.You better be ready to fight and not with words.GOD BLESS AMERICA

rw in ct   March 10th, 2008 9:59 pm ET

I do not believe Clinton wants this man on her ticket. From ABC News, Mar. 5th:

Accused Illinois fixer Antoin "Tony" Rezko is in debt by $50 million and relies on "family" handouts of $7,500 a month to pay monthly costs, according to a previously sealed court transcript reviewed by ABC News.

Rezko's bleak financial picture raises the question of how the Rezkos were able to buy a vacant lot adjoining the home of Sen. Barack Obama in 2005, at a time Rezko says he was already in deep debt.

John   March 10th, 2008 9:59 pm ET

IT is good for Obama be the VP, he will get 8 years of traning and be ready late on. When people gets sick, they are looking for the most experienced doctor, so does a country. Hillary is the one qualified for president or else McMcan.

Lily   March 10th, 2008 9:58 pm ET

Shame on you BILLARY!! Thats not gonna happen!!

Joe Black   March 10th, 2008 9:57 pm ET

Hillary has floated this idea time and time again during her campaign.

It is an effective way of neutering Barack Obama – by implying that he is Vice-Presidential material only, and also by implying that a vote for Hillary is a vote for Obama.

Obama and Hillary are offering two distinct choices this year, and they do not converge.

Obama stands for honesty and integrity, while Hillary represents the "old school" anything-for-a-buck anything-to-win mentaltiy.

Hillary chastizes Obama for taking $16,000 from a developer, while at the same time she made $11 MILLION DOLLARS last year from her Husband's friends.

Who are Hillary's 11 Milion Dollar friends? We don't know all their names – yet. But we do know it includes Vin Gupta, Norman Hsu and the goverment of Dubai (the same guys who wanted to control our ports).

Unfortunately, if Hillary wins the nomination, this data will come out in the general election, and McCain will make mincemeat of her.

Which is OK by me. Obama or McCain – both are honest, decent people who do not take huge sums of money from bad people.

ben   March 10th, 2008 9:56 pm ET

OBAMA/EDWARDS OR VICE VERSA FOR 2008. OTHERWISE, I WILL STAY HOME ON ELECTION DAY. WHY WASTE MY TIME?

Mary   March 10th, 2008 9:56 pm ET

Hillary Clinton is quite capable of winning the White House without Obama on the ticket. Hillary and Bill both were asked about this dream ticket. I thought they handle it nicely by not putting Obama down in any way. Neither of them appoarched the subject of Obama being VP, so he doesn't need to get so arrogrant about Hillary. He has always been rude if he was asked about Hillary being VP. Personally I don't think they are the dream team. Obama doesn't like Hillary and he has always protrayed that.

Dan Abrams we know that MSNBC is againt Hillary as a Presidental candidate so your facts shoot down on her just adds to biased journalism.

Jake   March 10th, 2008 9:56 pm ET

Let's discuss the Superdelegates. They were created to give the party a say in the nomination process. They have a responsibility to do what they feel is best for the Democratic party and to help select a candidate who a) has the best chance of winning and b) will better serve this country. I have far more faith in them than the American people, a lot of whom I would argue don't even vote based on the issues. How else do you explain the fact that Hillary is voted as significantly stronger on the economy and yet those same people aren't voting for her, despite citing it as THE most important issue? I will tell you this as someone who was in his 20's a short while ago, most young people follow trends more than they follow the issues. And voting for Obama is the trendy thing to do.
People need to just let the Superdelegates do their job and stop telling them how they should vote. It's in their best interest to pick the most electable and best President.
We gave the American people a voice in 2004 and they choose Bush. Nuff said.

Rebecca   March 10th, 2008 9:56 pm ET

Experience for President is not having tea and cookies in China and vacationing on 80 other countries.

Experience for President is not waking up Bill on the couch at 3 am to tell him the phones for him.

Experience for President is not being a radical feminist.

Experience for President is not being a bully and yelling at people when they don't agree with you.

Experience for President is not the ability to escape scandals.

Experience for President is not keeping secrets that you claim are part of your crucial experience.

Experience for President is not being corrupt, mean, dirty, hateful and so on.

Please tell us what other crucial experience you have Hillary, because so far we have not heard or seen any that pertains to your job application.

Paula Miller   March 10th, 2008 9:56 pm ET

Dream Ticket? I call it my worst nightmare ticket. I am so worried that Hillary will do something so" out of site" to get the win. She is ruthless. I was considering her nomination at first, but she is not the one to run our country. She is trying to destroy Obama. We should stand up for him and not let this happen. Obama wants to run a clean campaign. He is being knocked for what he stands for -CHANGE in politics. He will not stoop to Hillary's level. If she wins the democratic primary, I know a lot of people, beside myself, that will not vote for her.

Paula CA

Ada   March 10th, 2008 9:56 pm ET

I just talk to someone about this, and he said the Clintons must think they are more stupid people than wise people in this country. My response was, maybe they are more stupid people in this country. I mean the Democrats.

Pia   March 10th, 2008 9:55 pm ET

More spin from the desperate Clintons. If Obama does give the VP to Hillary, he had better get himself a food taster.
Clintons=corruption

VP   March 10th, 2008 9:54 pm ET

This wouldn't surprise me at all.

Which woman in her right mind would support her husband in infidelity besides her political ambitions. So if she doesn't win the nomination, she would be much more humiliated for her support for her husband.

I think this is a good lesson for people who doesn't have the self esteem to show what they are beside their personal ambitions.

Jack   March 10th, 2008 9:54 pm ET

Obama/Rezko '08: "Change without experience"

julie, ca   March 10th, 2008 9:53 pm ET

Last time we all checked, Barack Obama was in the lead.

Again, I'm offended by the Clinton arrogance that I've seen throughout this campaign.

Anonymous   March 10th, 2008 9:53 pm ET

shame on you hillary & bill

Mark   March 10th, 2008 9:53 pm ET

I think Obama's excellent reply pointing out Hillary's hypocrisy on this issue says all we need to know. Why would Hillary want a VP who, according to her previous claims, isn't qualified to be president?

(... unless, of course, Obama actually *IS* more than qualified, with more actual legislative experience than Hillary has.)

It's much to Obama's credit that he didn't offer her the VP slot, especially when there are so many far more experienced, positive, charismatic candidates for him to choose from, such as Al Gore, Bill Richardson, Federico Pena... people who actually served more than tea in the White House.

How arrogant do you have to be to offer the clear front runner in the race a seat on the back of the bus anyway?! Hillary Clinton's campaign is increasingly running against political reality.

She's only saying what she's saying because she's trying to bamboozle people into believing that she's even remotely close in this race, and that voters can get a "two-for-one" deal.

(This offer not valid in the continental United States, Alaska, Hawaii, and any other U.S.-held territories.)

Let's face it. She's desperate. Soon enough, she'll be suggesting that *SHE* should be Vice President. I hope Obama shoots that suggestion down too, because Hillary Clinton is the opposite of change.

Tony, Enterprise, Alabama   March 10th, 2008 9:53 pm ET

She may have benefited from the possibility in the beginning, but not now.

He has demonstrated such complete arrogance toward Senator Clinton, President Clinton and all of Hillary's supporters that he would no longer be accepted on the ticket.

Let the Independents and Republicans that voted for him elect him President. NEWSFLASH...they will be voting for John McCain on Election Day.

This Democrat is confident that Senator Clinton will win the nomination. Failing that, I will be writing her name in on my ballot in November.

I will never vote for Barack Obama, the pretender to the Presidency.

We cannot afford another Bush.

Anonymous   March 10th, 2008 9:52 pm ET

Hillary is proving that she is a cheap politician and has learned nothing but cheper mentality in 35 years in politics..she is a fraud and people should teach her a lesson..she is good for nothing..urghhh

Monique from NC   March 10th, 2008 9:52 pm ET

It makes perfect sense. Hillary is ready on day one – Barack has about 8 more years before he's ready. What a great ticket they would make!

Jake, California   March 10th, 2008 9:52 pm ET

This woman is truly a Monster.

She's a a witness in the Paul vs Clinton case and in that case she lied earlier about a lot of things too that she'll have to talk about in court.

There's no way she can be the democratic nominee when she's going to be serving jail terms like Martha Stewart!

Please don't listen to this monstrously woman America, she's a total destruction.

Mississippi, North Carolina, Oregon, Virgin Island, South Dakota etc will say no to her. I don't know what Pennsylvania is thinking...PA please save America and say no to this woman. Puerto Rico you should do same...

Gregory   March 10th, 2008 9:52 pm ET

Why is CNN giving this crap the light of day? Does anything the Clinton's say automatically turn into headlines. The person in second place in a two person race offers the leader the number two position. That's senseless. I guess this is "the silly season of politics."

After Hillary gets pummeled in Mississippi, I wonder how long it will take you to start talking about Pennsylvania.

Are you aware that a Hillary Clinton supporter, superdelegate is about to be indicted for being a part of a prostitution ring? How does that compare to Rezko, who by the way gave money to Clinton's national co-chair that wasn't given to charity. Run tel dat!!!

Dustin   March 10th, 2008 9:51 pm ET

Deb, you are the one who is ignorant. Last time I checked terms for president are 4 years not 8. "HIllary – 2008 and 2016" Your lack of even the most basic knowledge in the American Government is frightening. I hope other Hillary supporters aren't as uneducated as you.

Matt   March 10th, 2008 9:51 pm ET

I am very proud that Mr. Obama said that he in not running for vp. Clinton is a political prostitute and she must win any way she can because she is bought and paid for by the lobbyists in Washington DC. This will make our country bought and paid for by the lobbyists as long as she is in office. If she is on the ticket with Obama anywhere I will vote for McCain! I just prey that Obama does not choose her for his vp, They said that they can teach him how to be a corrupt politician Like Hill and Billy “HILLBILLY” by August!
She is only trying to steal this nomination because she will never get more pledged delegates than Obama! She must also need help with arithmetic!

Franklin   March 10th, 2008 9:51 pm ET

It 's come to the point that I am more disgusted with the political coverage in America than the politics, and that is saying a lot. The motives behind Mrs. Clintons statements are obvious, and yet you ask us, "Does Clinton benefit from so-called 'dream ticket' talk?" Why not frame the question,"What is the reason for Mrs. Clinton suggesting the 'dream ticket'?". Please, for the sake of America, start asking the tough, meaningful questions of all the candidates as well the current office holders. In my opinion, we desperately need a new direction from the leadership of this great country as well as the coverage of the people we have entrusted to run it. Please do your part, for the good of us all.

Helena Montana   March 10th, 2008 9:51 pm ET

No thank you! I don't want Hillary Clinton on any ticket! She's not even in the lead in the delegate count. How can she presume such a notion? Thank goodness Senator Obama has spoken out.

Barack Obama for President 2008!!!

xyndau   March 10th, 2008 9:51 pm ET

Senator Clinton tried to hold out hope of unifying the party after the primaries are completed. At no time, and I went back and looked at the transcripts of her comments, did she "offer" the VP slot to Obama, but rather implied – in the context of understanding that voters had a tough choice and wanted both choices, when only one could be made – that sometime down the road maybe something could happen. Bill Clinton also did not imply that an offer was being extended to Obama, but rather Bill Clinton was reflecting out loud the obvious that were, in fact, both Hillary and Obama on the same ticket, they would be unstoppable.

It is the MSM that took Hillary and Bill's comments and parsed them into a conclusion that Hillary was offering the VP slot to Obama. That was not the case. Instead, Hillary and Bill were leaving that door open for future consideration. Perhaps its time for the MSM to start parsing Obama's every word in the manner it does the Clinton's. The MSM can start by looking at the last year of the West Wing TV series, and in particular the episode where Jimmy Smitts was at the convention addressing the delegates – compare Smitts "convention speech" to Obama's recent speech and you might be surprised (and for that matter, look at many of the speeches in the West Wing series for rather remarkable similarities in Obama's "prose" and his stump speeches). But of course, that would mean that the MSM would actually have to say something critical of Obama (the MSM doesn't mind repeating Hillary's or other parties criticism of Obama, but has demonstrated an inability to be critical on its own initiative).

METhinks   March 10th, 2008 9:51 pm ET

I wonder what kind of help you have in your company? We the people, are the ceo's of our vote. Now the executive. the Congress, and Senate are our employees. Therefore how do we select as an employer, the right person to represent us best? Do as any good business CEO would do, get their resume and see which one can fill the job requirements best. No doubt I would choose Hillary. We need someone that is well known and respected by the world leaders. The leaders are not going to bow down to someone they know only by name. We cannot afford on the job training. It would take some time for the leaders to gain confidence on a new face. The world has attitude changed negative against us due to the decider. We can't afford to blow this!

denise   March 10th, 2008 9:50 pm ET

It seems to me like the Clinton's are desperate...I'm wondering why are they so desperate? Why is it that some people never change? Only someone that does not look at a person as an equal human being would suggest that Obama be a VP running mate. Hopefully, this will show those that are stuck in yesterday or stuck on stupid that Hiliary Clinton has no respect for those who don't look like her. By the way, America we need to see those tax returns....I think she has something to hide......

Joe   March 10th, 2008 9:50 pm ET

This is really hard to comprehend.. the Clintons must really think that Democrats are idiots..

If Obama is not fit, according to the Clintons, to be the Commander-in-Chief, Obama is fit to a heart beat away from the presidency on day one.. after all, that's what the criteria for vice president is..

Now go figure...

May God take the Clintons away from the American political scene.. go away Clintons... enough insulting the intelligence of Americans... shame and REALLY shame on you.. no one can pull you out of gutter.. you belong in the gutter..

Amy   March 10th, 2008 9:49 pm ET

If Obama were her VP, I would fear for his life.

Alex Mackin   March 10th, 2008 9:49 pm ET

CHANGE... to what??? Utopia according to barack obama? And UNITE... unite who exactly????

It's been cute so far i must admit, BUT the world hasn't changed in the last year for barack obama, and nor will it. Can you think of anyone who's proclaimed themselves an american messiah and managed to do anything about it?

He's a man with a microphone on an ego-trip, but disguises it by trying to make it sound like its all about 'us'; when its perfectly clear it is all about HIM. His goals add up to an impossible transformation of politcs itself..... i can see him a few years from now, taking all the heat in the world when everyone else realises he is just a clever POLTICIAN who could sculpt his voice like a preacher and criticize like a backseat driver.

Hope In Action   March 10th, 2008 9:49 pm ET

Co-presidents Hillary and Bill, with Obama as number three? That's not a dream ticket, that's Nightmare on Pennsylvania Avenue. I get the feeling Obama will maintain his integrity. The arrogance of her to "offer" him a VP position. I can't believe it. And, if this country decides to go back to the past with the Clintons, we will have missed a superb opportunity to take our country upward and onward. They told MLK it wasn't the time, that the civil rights movement was going too fast, that it was too idealistic, that the country just wasn't ready yet to stop lynching people and oppressing people. But, the time for justice is always "right now", it is always ASAP. I wonder if these Hillary supporters think the freedom riders were idealistic and brainwashed? Standing for change and standing for justice always has a sense of urgency. We have a chance at our very fingertips right now to get on the road to the future. In fact, it is long overdue that we take steps in that direction. Let's not miss that chance. I've been exposed to enough Hillary supporters now to see how they operate from a position of fear and identity politics. They refuse to see Obama for the incredible INDIVIDUAL he is. Instead, they stereotype him. I can't believe some of these posts that are so insulting. I just pray the people in this country with sense will outnumber those who are stuck in the past. Going backwards to the Clintons would truly be a disaster for us and the world.

Erin   March 10th, 2008 9:49 pm ET

I hope that the voters can see through this and vote for Obama.

Mike   March 10th, 2008 9:49 pm ET

The arrogance and self-centeredness of the Clintons is breathtaking. It appears that the "vast right wing conspiracy" might have been right about some of the stuff they threw at the Clintons back in the 90's.

Angela   March 10th, 2008 9:48 pm ET

I need to say this because this is whats going to happen you watch and see..........in 1992 in Colorado Amendment Two appeared that it was going to be defeated by a large margin. All our polls told us it was so. We in the Lesbian and Gay community were over confident like Mambo Obama's supporters are...........we were high fiving and planned victory celebration (but we weren't mean spirited towards our oppenents like Obama's supporters are towards Hillary.....................well we lost by a big margin. People in polls said they were going to vote a certain way...Our way ..........we Lesbians and Gays were so full of faith and hope..........people didn't vote the way we thought they were going to vote. People said one thing and on election night voted opposite of what they said they were going to vote. Obama is in this race for his own ambition. He really thinks he is going to win. Blind ambition. Everyone is afraid to speak the truth for fear of appearing bigoted or racist. Come election night if he is the candidate............he will not win. Vote Clinton 2008 Viva Clinton Viva the only Democratic candidate who will win. Paz en el mundo

Trista   March 10th, 2008 9:48 pm ET

Hillary is such a joke. Thank goodness that Obama has the sense to nip this one in the bud. AUGH! At one point, I considered voting for Hillary, but her typical Washington political ways make me ill.

OBAMA minus Hillary is the way to go!!

VP   March 10th, 2008 9:48 pm ET

Hillary.. you think you are ready to serve the day one.

The truth is... the rest of us do not!!!

Republican Joe   March 10th, 2008 9:48 pm ET

Having voted republican the last three elections, I would only consider voting dem without Hillary on the ticket. For what's worth, I am not the only one that feels this way - having talked to a dozen of my friends/colleagues, all have agreed they are "likely" (including myself) to vote for Obama, but never Hillary. Dems best shot at winning this election is to nominate Obama.

BTW, all this talk of "experience" is complete BS - what has this great wisdom (gov't in general, including Hillary) brought us - debt, rising healthcare, irresponsible fiscal spending, etc. It's time for leadership not ONLY wisdom.

Peace out

bruno, switzerland   March 10th, 2008 9:47 pm ET

we're watching this with great interest over here. it's amazing how the clintons can tear down obama as totally inexperiened and then suggest he be her vice-president? it's like with one mouth they say he can't do the job of being president, with the other mouth they say he should be her vice-president, just so she can get all the voters back that she lost to him. if she were ever to get the nomination who would be left to vote for her after such dirty deeds. oh yeah, she will still have those clinton fans that swallow all this dirty politics and dirty deeds and dishonest politics. thank god even more and more hillary supporters wake up and see what she is really like. a lot of us over here really think that her negativity looks so grim compared to obamas message of hope. her negative campaign really sticks out compared to his and we're wondering how come some people still support her?

VP   March 10th, 2008 9:47 pm ET

Hillary... you are Hillarious!!!

speakkup   March 10th, 2008 9:46 pm ET

Go Obama!!! The Clintons are desperate and deceptive!!! And Hillary seems bi-polar in her behavoir. The American people are tired of the Clintons still playing the same old game of politics – divisive and negative!!!

Obama has shown an even-tempered personality throughout the campaign – he has stayed above the cut and run negative politics!

Hillary Clinton has shown a spectrum of irrational behaviors throughout the campaign – from a misty-eyed, desperate candidate in NH to a scolding school MOM in OH, to a consillatory candidate at the debates, to an arrogrant candiate at her much needed winning in TX and OH, to again a desperate candadiate in MS speaking on adding Obama as VP. I don't know about most people but clearly to me she seems to borderline bi-polar in personaltiies. Or maybe it's just the timing of the month which I can somewhat understand for most women but not for a commander of chief potential!

Tom in NC   March 10th, 2008 9:46 pm ET

We will never vote for Hillary and politics as usual. You Hillary supporters are to arragant for your own good. You are dividers.

linda   March 10th, 2008 9:45 pm ET

hilllary,, its time to stand up and face the issues here ,, not think of ways to back-stab,, dirty play is just that,, dirty,, we dont need that,, someone whos goin to get things done the way it should be done,,,, GO ABAMA,,,, by the way hillary,, tell bill to stand back,, hes had his turn,,(OUCH)

Carl   March 10th, 2008 9:45 pm ET

Anyone else sick of hearing about Boeing and their complaining right now? Protesting the contract? Are you serious? This is a competitive market and capitalism. I work for an engineering firm, and we go after contracts against other firms. The one that presents themselves the best and shows they can do the job right gets the contract.

Instead of asking "why didn't we get it"... they are throwing a sick tantrum and blaming our own government. Last time I checked, foreign cars are kicking our rear ends in the market... I guess planes are next.

Boeing, grow up and stop complaining.

Kerry   March 10th, 2008 9:44 pm ET

Bill, your judgment on a presidential candidate is as bad as your facts about who leads in the popular vote. Actually, OBAMA is leading in the Popular Vote, Delegates and States. Do a fact check.

Lynn D   March 10th, 2008 9:43 pm ET

Senator Obama is sly politician despite what he and his campaign say. Senator Clinton has more experience and is modest about her accomplishments. Senator Obama should step aside and have respect for Senator Clinton's senority. His chance may come in the future. The time now is hers. And as for Michigan and Florida why is a redo needed when the voters have already spoken? If the table was turned, how many people would be pushing for a revote? Senator Obama was on both ballots and the voters spoke. He was on the Michigan ballot as uncommitted. His name was on the Florida ballot. If Howard Dean is out there reading this, I suggest to him that he release the delegates for Michigan and Florida. Mr. Dean, a redo would be unfair to Senator Clinton. She didn't campaign in either state and she won. She left her name on both ballots. Senator Obama could have done the same. Let's all stop the unfair treatment of Senator Clinton. Stop wasting money and let the votes from Michigan and Florida stand. And finally, CNN has been bias, too. Someone once told me they didn't watch CNN because it was "Clinton News Network". What happened to you CNN? You know Senator Clinton would be the best president. Let Senator Clinton have her well deserved time as President of the United States.

joedee   March 10th, 2008 9:43 pm ET

Hillary will go to ANY length to win. Including looking her supporters and the world in the eye and lying through her teeth. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see what game-player she is.

Whomever she would choose as a VP would be 3rd in command right behing Bill Clinton and then Hillary.

Why would Obama sully his reputation by even considering being Hills' VP?

Rattler   March 10th, 2008 9:42 pm ET

It's a sign of defeat from both Clintons. Yeah, they need Obama. And Obama and America don't need them period.

Character Counts   March 10th, 2008 9:41 pm ET

Don't you read your own headlines – "Obama Rejects Clinton's VP Offer"?

Elois Rice   March 10th, 2008 9:41 pm ET

The American People have decided that Senator Obama should be the next Commander in Chief. He has shown himself to be a leader, he uses good judgment and he thinks before he speaks. Hillary can be Vice-President as long as Obama is there to keep her in check.

cwu   March 10th, 2008 9:41 pm ET

Clinton's offer of VP to Obama is another way to emphasize Obama's major weakness on experience. Hillary is signing that were Obama to win the nomination he will eventually need an experienced VP, older and wiser. Which lead us back to the choices of either Obama with his lack of experience or the fear that Obama's VP will be some potential nightmare, such as, Dick Cheney. Funny thing the media and the "experts" can't even follow Bill's strategy!

Karen   March 10th, 2008 9:40 pm ET

It's true. Hillary will stoop to ANYTHING. She's now lying about not knowing about the coverup prostitute ring story which broke today about her NY Gov. Spitzer. Voters please, end her candidacy!!!

crazy   March 10th, 2008 9:40 pm ET

All of this stuff about Hiliary doing anything to win, blah, blah blah isn't making me want to vote for Obama, it is actually making me want to vote for Hiliary. I want a President that is going to stand up for our country.

He claims our government is corrupt, well he is part of this government that he is calling corrupt. He claims that he didn't vote for war..but i don't remember seeing him in the Senate at that time..I could be wrong.

Anyway, I don't want another 4 years of this BS so my vote is for Hiliary

Pon Mao   March 10th, 2008 9:40 pm ET

Only a Clinton can make a loser appears to be a winner! I just wish the Clintons know something called human decency!

Jim   March 10th, 2008 9:40 pm ET

This is the same old politics that we've come to know and detest from Washington, notably the current regime, and now from Clinton.

I am a die hard Democrat, but I'll vote for Nader before I cast a vote for a woman who will clearly say or do anything– including praise her Republican rival while at the same time denigrating her Democratic opponent– in order to obtain power.

Do the math! Her campaign cannot hope to match, let alone exceed, Obama's delegate total. Even if she wins every contest from now until the convention with a 10% margin! So now they float this nonsense about well, they might consider Obama as a number two. They've got to, as they have no other hope of selling Her Imperiousness as a viable candidate to the super delegates and the convention as a whole!

Just say no to politics as usual. Just say no to the candidate who voted to send our troops into the Iraqi quagmire. Just say no to the Rovian slimeball politicking we've come to expect out of Washington beltway politicos.

Say yes to hope and change!

Obama 08!

Glenn   March 10th, 2008 9:39 pm ET

Hillary cannot even manage her own campaign. How in the Hell is she ever going to run the country. The way she has run her campaign sounds an awful lot like the way Bushie has run the country. BLIND LOYALTY TO PEOPE WHO SCREW UP!! Sound familiar "Your doing a heckova job Brownie" (substitue, Mark Penn et,al for Brownie) There is no way that BARACK needs to play second fiddle to her. He leads and she is desperate. Maybe if she had planned for a campaign after super tuesday that it would be over, but apparently life after super tuesday was not even on their radar scope.

WELL HILLARY, A FUNNY THING HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO YOUR CORONATION, LOL.

OBAMA '08

Russell Nc   March 10th, 2008 9:38 pm ET

It is nothing but a ploy by the Clintons to try to get more votes for her.

Rattler   March 10th, 2008 9:38 pm ET

No Way . Bill should offer his opinion to the NY Gov on how to lie thru his predicament and yes Hillary to advise Mrs Gov at this time. This is the only pairing Billary can do best right now.

The Clintons have too much stinking baggage from their WHouse yrs. We don't need them back.

Mandy   March 10th, 2008 9:37 pm ET

Sooo, when I say to Mr. Obama that I want to vote for both of them, his answer would not be "that might be a consideration in the future"?

If Mr. Obama is so eliquent and such a good guy what exactly would his answer be?????

I guess trying to be polite and positive for the party isn't the correct thing for Hilary to do.

I guess she should just say hell NO he doesn't have the experience.....,double talker.....etc., etc...

Go Hilary

Lamont,Jackson,Ms   March 10th, 2008 9:37 pm ET

I'm a Mississippian, the idea of our news channels favoritism for certain canidates is a for sure notion, that racism is still alive and ongoing. When Mrs.Clinton was here, her telecast was on three different T.V. Channels. Barack could only be seen on the internet ,I think that's unfair.

Steve   March 10th, 2008 9:37 pm ET

If Hillary is on the ticket you can bet McCain will win. Hillary is and always has been a very divisive character. She will turn off too many Independant voters and the Neocons will rally to get Repub voters to the polls to keep her out of office.

Obama appeals to a much broader audience. He'll draw far more Independant votes than HIllary will. He'd have a good chance of beating McCain. If Hillary gets the nomination, you can count on four more years of a Republican Whitehouse.

Adam in Pittsburgh   March 10th, 2008 9:36 pm ET

Lets get real.....shame on you New York Governor who raised money for the Clintons....Lets get real! Meet me in Mississippi! Wait, I mean meet me in states where blue collar white workers and white women make up the majority....and in Puerto Rico where they have more delegates than New Hampshire. Shame on you Senator Nelson for voting to approve stripping your state of delegates and then you try to blame everyone in the politcial system but yourself and your buddies in Florida.

Jake   March 10th, 2008 9:36 pm ET

Whoever posted OBAMA will drive America down. Look at America Now dum dums. Some of you up here are delusional, and I don't know if its just ignorance or what, but wake up.

American is already headed down, to the point that Foreign countries are just pouring money to buy the FOR SALE AMERICA.

WE ALL NEED TO STOP TEARING EACH OTHER APART ABOUT THIS SITUATION CAUSE FOR DEMOCRATS ITS TEARING YOU ALL APART, YOUR NOT DEMOCRATS, YOUR HILLOCRATS OR OBAMACRATS. We all are not retarded here, we see what is going on, and politicians have been doing it for years. Its up to the American people to decide who the president will be and they will do so. But one thing I do Know, have some respect and try not to be so offensive while posting your opinions.

Laura   March 10th, 2008 9:36 pm ET

It's obvious that you guys keep supporting the Clinton campaign.
You alway put up misleading delegate numbers. Then the other day, you said that Barack's lead over McCain was about the same a Hillary's klead over McCain, when Barack's lead was twice as much!

Shame on you "journalists" for your lack of ethics.

LS

Liz in Texas   March 10th, 2008 9:35 pm ET

How about Obama/Edwards? or Obama/Richardson? Or my son even suggested Obama/Guiliani!!

I will take Obama/anything....no Clinton in there please. Clintons are nothing but politics as usual and now they're playing dirty pool.

Adam in Pittsburgh   March 10th, 2008 9:34 pm ET

Obama/Edwards!!!!!

Gloria Blake   March 10th, 2008 9:34 pm ET

If Obama doesn't accept the VP slot if offered to him, he really does not care about the Democratic Party and its people. On the other hand, he did say that WashingtonDC is a place where good ideas go to die. So why is he in such a hurry to get there?

SWING STATE FAMILY   March 10th, 2008 9:34 pm ET

"This thing has really been given a life of its own." Clinton
-------------------------------

Ok, tell me, of all the people here, who is seriously stupid enough to believe that ?

jujub   March 10th, 2008 9:33 pm ET

I can't believe this...why on earth would Barack Obama want to be within 100 feet of Hillary Clinton any time in the future?

She has spent months bashing his his religion (he's Christian not Muslim), his Church (what about the priests who abused children folks or McCain's buddy who is an Anti-Semite), his patriotism (he was singing the National Anthem not saying the Pledge of Allegiance), his drug use (fully disclosed in a book he wrote years ago), his middle name (means Beautiful not Terrorist) ; his voting "present" as an Illinois Senator (something that is a political vote, not an absentee vote), his experience (he has 3 more years in an elected judicial position), his position of NAFTA (his other book wrote of his position and the Clintons did the wink wink to Canada), his Senate bills and record (far more substantive bills and resolutions than HRC); his absence after his announced his presidency (she has voted less than him and has also been absent); his purported plagiarism (while she plagiarizes his words); his lead in the race for the nomination (she is behind folks)....need I say more. Hillary: You and your supporters are truly delusional.

Adam in Pittsburg   March 10th, 2008 9:33 pm ET

Obama/Edwards in 2008!

I will vote for McCain if HIllary is on the ticket.

Ellie   March 10th, 2008 9:33 pm ET

Do you remember when you were a "kid" and your mother told you "NO"? And you tried and tried to convince her to change her mind, and in the end the answer was still NO?????

WELL HILLARY AND BILLY BOY: THE ANSWER IS NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Tubby The Tuba   March 10th, 2008 9:33 pm ET

Hillary is manipulative...she would NOT offer anything to Obama..she is lying again. She is soooo willing to let the front runner for the presidency of the US of A be her Vice?...but he is good enough to be the President. According to her, John McCain is better prepared to be the president than Obama? Doublespeak....Old politics....same ol Clinton.

aware   March 10th, 2008 9:32 pm ET

Barack isn't ready for a president or a vice president spot. However, his refusal to consider a vp spot shows his arrogant me first and only me egomania and power hungry character.

Give it up Barack! You are a loser!

Hillary the HOPE of 08 and the smart choice! Yes, we will! :)

derek steinbeck   March 10th, 2008 9:30 pm ET

Barack Obama should be happy to become VP. If he doesn't want the job and gets more experience there, well I believe he never will have another chance to become our president. By the way there are other great contenders for VP. The black congress man Ford would be a great choice or Mr Rundell from Pennsylvania or Ben Nelson from Florida or Mr Strickland from Ohio, a must win state for the Democrats.
Who is Barack Obama, that being a VP is not good enough for him?
For the first time the press gave Obama a little negative coverage and he got cold feet. That shows that he is not ready. Under Hillary Clinton as President he would learn more to be ready, but may be he never is ready for the top job!

Derek Steinbeck

clinton   March 10th, 2008 9:30 pm ET

does anyone know this quote?

"we should on all Occasions avoid a general Action, or put anything to the Risque, unless compelled by a necessity, into which we ought never to be drawn." George Washington

Can anyone tell me obama's campaign is running against the meaning of this quote?

You know obama is following the principals of the first and most notible commander in chief in the histoy of the united states.

Some are calling his lack of attacks against hillary clinton as weak, but he obama knows something george washington knows and america has forgotten. Washinton message was to chose your battles and chose them wisely and to take part in battles which mean little to america and its well being.

One battle he is fighting is spreading hope as did george washington who was elected as the first commander in chief. So far his voting against the war in iraq follows the quote of values. Did hillary clintons choice follow his quote? Comaparing each persons campaign thus far do you believe hillary resembles anything that our country was founded on? Beyond the choice to very quickly go into iraq which clearly does not follow the greatest commander in chief's vision, please convince why to vote for hillary? What has hillary done worthy of mine and other obama supporters votes without a tear down of obama and without comparison of the two if obama was not in the picture why should i vote for her?

Becky Montgomery   March 10th, 2008 9:30 pm ET

Note to DNC: trying to force these two on the same ticket: NO. It won't fly.

Mark   March 10th, 2008 9:29 pm ET

From what I read NPR.org reported Obama victorious.. but it is nice to see you guys are going to pick the winner, along with Fox, and company.

Bravo mainstream media.. and here I thought the people were going to be responsible for once.

John Smith   March 10th, 2008 9:29 pm ET

Because NUMBERS do not lie, I hope this will help all advocates to look at these and chill off:

Pledged Delegates: Obama = 1,347; Hillary = 1,200 (+147 for Obama)

SuperDelegates: Obama = 206 (up from 90); Hillary = 238 (down by 25)

Total Pledged + SuperDel
Obama = 1,553; Hillary = 1,438 (+ 115 for Obama)

Texas Caucus
Obama = 23,918; Hillary = 18,620 (+5,298 for Obama)

Even if Hillary wins all the remaining states (including MI and FL), the odds of catching up to Obama is virtually impossible. So, this is a done deal folks! Note that any win will result in shared number of (proportional) delegates for these 2 candidates. Also, note that some SuperDels have started to shift to Obama. If you cannot deal with these numbers as facts, you must be a "blind" advocate!!

Derrick   March 10th, 2008 9:28 pm ET

To America the Beautiful
What are you smoking! The Clintons are absolutely the most scandolous couple in the history of American politics. Hilary Clinton receives hundreds of thousands from Insurance companies and then tells you want to give you universal Health Care. Hilary Clinton votes for bankruptcy reform to make it harder for average American to get out from under debt. The Clintons support NAFTA. The Clintons received 10 million from Saudi Arabia for their library. She has numerous ties to questionable fundraisers one doing time in jail (Hsu) and the other fleeing the country to avoid prosecution. She lies about negotiating peace deals in Kosovo and N. Ireland. I was in my 30's when the Clinton's were in power and recollection of the historical facts do not bear this out.

Obama has been extremely restrained because you Clintonites will scream that he is going negative when he points out her problems. Face it America unless Jesus Christ himself is running you can tie EVERY candidate to someone that is questionable.

By the way how much experience did Bill Clinton, Ronald Reagan, Jimmy Carter, and George Bush have before getting elected. Remember this was the knock on Clinton. Oh but I forget you memory only goes back to 2000!

robert   March 10th, 2008 9:28 pm ET

So, Hillary "won" the "big" states, huh. BS. Numbers do not lie! Obama won the popular vote as well as the delegate count!

Consider the top 9 "big" states that have voted so far
State . . . . . . . Obama . . . . . . . .Clinton
California . . .2,126,000 . . . . . . .2,553,000
Texas . . . . . 1,358,000 . . . . . . .1,459,000
New York. . . . . 698,000 . . . . . . .1,003,000
Illinois. . . . 1,302,000 . . . . . . . .662,000
Ohio . . . . . . 982,000. . . . . . . 1,212,000
Georgia . . . . . 704,000 . . . . . . . .330,000
New Jersey. . . . 492,000 . . . . . . . .603,000
Virginia . . . . 627,000 . . . . . . . .350,000
Washington . . . 354,000 . . . . . . . .316,000

Total . . . . . 8,643,000 . . . . . . .8,487,000

---

California . . . 167 . . . . . . 203
Texas . . . . . 99 . . . . 94
New York. . . . . 93 . . . . 139
Illinois. . . . 104 . . . 49
Ohio . . . . . . 66. . . 75
Georgia . . . . . 60 . . . 27
New Jersey. . . . 48 . . . . 59
Virginia . . . . 54 . . . . 29
Washington . . . 53 . . . 25

Total . . . . . 744 . . . 700

SJ Thornton   March 10th, 2008 9:28 pm ET

Who does she think Hillary is!?
1: Hillary insults the voters in "smallers" states.
2: Hillary compares herself to a Republican and then wonders why people hate her.
3: Hillary insultes the African- American community.

What is wrong with her? Don't people see what she is!

kcmo   March 10th, 2008 9:28 pm ET

I think all these CLINTON supporters need to rethink WHY she would say OBAMA is not ready to be president but he can be vice president? This is her last ditch attempt to get the votes that she would otherwise lose.

If Obama was not ready then why make him #2? THINK AMERICA!

Darlene   March 10th, 2008 9:27 pm ET

As a Canadian I have been engrossed in the democratic run. It is amazing how the story before the Ohio/Texas primary win regarding meeting with some of our politicians regarding NAFTA were smeared in the states..thanks to the Hillary Campaign. Our news media, and subsequently our government were not only disgusted at this "leak" within the government, but our Prime Minister expressed a sincere apology to the Barack Obama, and ensured that the source of this false story would be found...it's 3:00 in the morning Hillary, and your phone is ringing...it's the Canadian Government...are you ready to answer?

Rob   March 10th, 2008 9:26 pm ET

The reality is the Hillary is Bush II. The republicans know McCain's campaign is a joke. They are actually pulling for HIllary. She's as much in the pocket of corporate America as any republicans ever have been. Look at the republican style fear ads put by Hillary. Come on people..don't get fooled AGAIN!!!!

Steve   March 10th, 2008 9:26 pm ET

I'm gonna laugh when Michigan and Florida become relevant, their delegates get seated, and Hillary becomes the nominee! Nobody gets to 2025 without them!

Toe Smashin   March 10th, 2008 9:26 pm ET

What is wrong with you people?
The Republicans must certainly be eating this up: Democrats are so split they have resorted to name-calling within the party.

Please, please, if we really are interested in unity – and we certainly can't win if we are this divided – we have got to stop slamming each other. Disagreeing with you about who is the best candidate does not make a person an idiot.

Come on, let's pull it together, even if we have to bite our lips to do it. It *IS* our only shot at changing things.

7Sisters   March 10th, 2008 9:25 pm ET

Hillary Clinton is far more qualified than Senator Obama who does not have a good track record in the Illinois state legislature nor as a US Senator. His arrogance in running for the Presidency is astounding after just a year or so in the Senate.

As a twenty-something year old who has never missed a vote in any state and local primary or general election, I am deeply disappointed in my peers for blindly following this Obama trend as what they perceive as the "cool" thing to do.

If Clinton does prevail, and she is smarter and more seasoned, her in depth responses to questions (Obama just uses the "ditto" approach and then adopts them as his platform), I hope she picks someone like Joe Biden who is extremely qualified or one of the state's governors. Just not Obama. My gut says he is not to be trusted.

Antoinette   March 10th, 2008 9:25 pm ET

Go Obama!!!!!!!

He doesnt need her, she needs him

Liz   March 10th, 2008 9:25 pm ET

If you look at it fairly; Obama and Clinton are tied. Hillary won Florida- if Obama wanted to have Florida not count then he should have decided to take his name off the ballot. Florida's votes should count toward the popular vote. The delegates should decide based on individual judgement and what they determine are the important factors. Obama won caucuses that favored his base and didn't represent the actual votes of all the citizens of the state. I'm not saying he wouldn't have won, I'm just thinking it is a factor to consider. I give so much credit to Obama for running such a tough race and I like what he has to say about education. I will not vote for him if he wins the nomination and does not offer the vp spot to Clinton. It appears that Hillary offered it knowing that if she wins, she would like to make an effort to unite the party so that the entire democrat base would vote in the General Election. I think it is true most of her supporters will consider voting for Obama, I guess we are behaving like our candidate pick (fair and uniters)- I don't get all the hate, didn't Clinton fight for minority rights and healthcare and weren't the 90's good....Both Clinton and Obama should be able to fight for this important job.

Bagga   March 10th, 2008 9:25 pm ET

I am rather surprised that Obama haven't went back to basic yet "talking about change."

Donny Ott   March 10th, 2008 9:24 pm ET

Personally, I think that Hillary can do much better than Obama as VP. The audacity of arrogance, though, to insist on going from a virtual zero to straight to the top with only a few hundred "present" votes on thorny issues in the state senate in between. Truth be told, if Obama is the Democratic nominee, we are likely looking at least another four years of a Republican Administration in the White House.

Contrary to Jude and others' comments, polls from many of the swing states are already showing that key parts of the Democratic Party (e.g., Latinos and "lunch-bucket" Democrats) would favor McCain over Obama in a General Election - including even in a state as blue as New Jersey. And, if Obama's camp succeeds in disenfranchising Florida voters, you can bet that one will go red as well.

NO TO BARACK "PRESENT" OBAMA.

Hillary for President!

Muzza   March 10th, 2008 9:23 pm ET

While my respect for BO is very low, I can understand why Clinton would offer him a VP role – she is trying to maximize the likelihood of Democrats voting in November and that's a good thing. Given they have split the popular vote 50/50 it would make sense for them to do a "dream ticket". Ultimately, however, the more senior and experienced candidate should lead and that is Clinton. It's disappointing that Obama, the so-called "unifier" (sarcasm), could not, just for once, put his arrogance aside and show some humility and respect in response to Clinton's offer. He could have politely addressed the issue by returning the statement and saying that he would hope Clinton would be his VP should he win the nomination. No, as always, Mr. Audacity of Arrogance couldn't think beyond his own need for power and adulation. Perhaps Clinton should look elsewhere for a VP...

Kizeem   March 10th, 2008 9:23 pm ET

Whoever wants Hillary Clinton as VP is looking to have a prostitution ring operated by Bill Clinton, and Eliot Spitzer as legal adviser in the Whitehouse.

Americans are not crazy. Hillary and campaign are delusional.

NO THANKS TO HILLARY CLINTON AS ANYTHING EXCEPT SENATOR, and this is because I don’t live in NY City.

Michigander   March 10th, 2008 9:22 pm ET

The only thing that will happen if Clinton is on the ticket, either as the presdential or vice-president candidate, is the election will go to Sen. McCain. Why? If Hillary gets the nomination without a majority of the popular vote (sounds like the 2004 presidential race...) but all the superdelegates feel she has "paid her dues," there will be an open revolt in the Democratic Party. The Obama supporters will either stay home or cross over and vote Republican. Many conservative Democrats (yes there are a few of us!) remember Sen. McCain has reached across the aisle, much to the displeasure of his own party.

This political trick of "offering" the VP spot is the same as the Clinton campaign's refusal to remove Clinton's name from the Michigan primary ballot. Im my opinion the only way she got 50%+ of the vote was primarily by name recognition; note 40% (including yours truly!) voted "uncommitted" just to ensure not all delegates (if they're ever seated much less admitted to the convention) went to her.

RO   March 10th, 2008 9:22 pm ET

Its seems some people don't realize this:

Clinton and Obama splits the Democratic vote evenly.
Clinton carries the core democratic vote (the ones who will vote blue come the general election).
Obama carries the independants and Republicans (the ones who normally vote red in the general election).

Some Obama supporters will not vote for Clinton if she becomes the nominee.
Some Clinton supports will not vote for Obama if he becomes the nominee (I'm one of them).

Ok, if Clinton becomes the nominee, the traditional blue states are guaranteed. She might even eek out a win in PA/OH/ or FL (the swing states). However, if Obama becomes the nominee, the democrats may not carry those traditional blue states, and he might not make inroads with PA/OH/ or FL.

A joint ticket would be great, but only if Clinton is at the top of the ticket. I frankly think she can do better than Obama. He is falling quite flat, kind of reminds me of John Kerry in '04. What a disappointment.

Elizabeth Arnett   March 10th, 2008 9:22 pm ET

This country was founded on the idea that we can use laws to appeal to reason and create a lasting union. The Democratic party made rules and doled out consequences for its primary elections. Now cry-baby Hillary wants to re-do the elections. She thinks that some states are more important than others.

Here's Sen. Obama using reason to prove why he deserves the Democratic nomination:

"I don't know how somebody who's in second place is offering the vice presidency to the person who's in first place."

"If I'm not ready, how is you think I'd be such a great vice president?"

Here's Senator Clinton playing dirty:
"I've got lifetime of experience, Senator McCain has a lifetime of experience, and Senator Obama has a speech he made in 2002."

I have two questions for you, Hillary:
1. What have you accomplished, with your lifetime of experience?
2. Who do you REALLY want to win? The

kevin from alaska   March 10th, 2008 9:21 pm ET

Michigan:Mitt Romney::Texas & Ohio:Hillary Clinton

It's over folks.

Mark   March 10th, 2008 9:21 pm ET

I think the Clinton campaign created a meme. That would be a self replicating idea. The essence of the idea is that with Obama as VP, Clinton is president and Obama is not.

The Clintons get style points.

jeff   March 10th, 2008 9:21 pm ET

I think this will be great the I have a dream ticket,free health care,free college, free everything,free at last free at last thank god free at last. The dam rich people will pay for this,anyone who makes over 25000. a year. Bring all the troops home so we can fight the war here on are own soil. just think of all the oil we will save, we wont have to fly are planes over the ocean, the ships over the sea this will be a perfect world.

changing times   March 10th, 2008 9:21 pm ET

Can we say Conflict of Interest. A Vote for McCain is a Vote for Hillary and Vice Versa.

No wonder the Republicans are now saying I'll vote for Hillary ... Ann Coulter/Cunningham and Hannity Signing On Board.

Let's say that the Democratic nomination battle had been winnowed down to two candidates, and that one of those two candidates (let's call him Barack Obama) was a huge favorite to win. Meanwhile, the GOP nominee has been all but decided. (We'll call him John McCain.)
Now let's imagine that Obama's opponent (we'll call her Hillary Clinton) was desperately slinging every piece of mud she could at him without regard to whether or not her attacks would help John McCain.

Finally, imagine that you found out that Clinton's chief strategist was not only her campaign's leading advocate for these attacks - but was also the CEO of a public affairs firm whose DC-based lobbying subsidiary was headed up by John McCain's top adviser.

Would you say this posed at least the appearance of a conflict of interest for the strategist in question?
What would you think if you found out that it's all true? Well it is true

Peter   March 10th, 2008 9:21 pm ET

Hey, Barack, you should not have turned down VP so quickly and so rudely because I think your chances of a cabinet position are pretty slim.

D.Casey | Sebastopol, CA   March 10th, 2008 9:21 pm ET

Of course Clinton benefits by flying the idea of Obama as her VP... it's yet another sad example of how the Clintons will do or say just about anything to win.

And honestly, all this talk about needing a fighter for President... I'm TIRED of fighters in the White House... I want a President that:

1) I can trust
2) who can say "Nuclear" not "Nucular"
3) is eloquent and able to give a speech that motivates people, including Congress
4) doesn't have years of debts & baggage from political backroom dealing

Can you say... Obama? And let's face it... he doesn't NEED her on his ticket. I see Obama picking someone like Biden or Richardson.

NEVER BAMA   March 10th, 2008 9:21 pm ET

'America the Beautiful' is exactly right. If by sheer LUCK, Obama becomes president-The US will wish Bush was back!
How arrogant of him to shot down a potential VP offer. That's just plain stupid and rude. Thankfully so, because I wouldn't want him as a VP either. I'm a republican and seriously considering voting for Hillary. She talks the talk and can back it up. She's not a quitter-If she were a man, she'd be praised for her determination. This is the kind of leader this country needs. Obama is nothing but a smooth talker and a push over. Convienently absent for votes he fears may shed him in a bad light. He'll needs LOTS of advisors to tell him what to do. I'm sure the middle east can't wait for him to be in office!
Keep it up Hillary!

will   March 10th, 2008 9:20 pm ET

to all dems look at what is happening tonight in New York we do not need that in the white house again. another sex scandal and yes he is a clinton support i am shocked. gov of newyork was client number 9 what client number is pres. bill clinton number 1 i would bet.

Nancy, Oklahoma   March 10th, 2008 9:20 pm ET

I don't think I have ever been more disgusted in an election than now. Hillary's behavior is disappointing. Is she a Rep or Dem. Honestly I can't tell the difference. Do primary voters find these tactics edificating attributes for President? We need to elect someone to be proud of. I sincerely hope the superdelagates are watching carefully. The Clinton's are trying to steal the nomination. All hell will break loose if they are allowed to do so.

SWING STATE FAMILY   March 10th, 2008 9:20 pm ET

Somebody put these crazy Billaries in their place ... it's insane. Their is the truth and then there is Billary World (and the media lives in Media world, taking their clues from SNL)

Yeah, I bet ... this is the kind of democracy the world is waiting for.

Democrazy a la Hil-liar-y Clinton !

Jim in FL   March 10th, 2008 9:20 pm ET

I guess this means that Elliot Spitzer's wife will now run for Governor of New York.

D   March 10th, 2008 9:20 pm ET

I DONT BLAME BARACK FOR DISSING THAT B.S SHE ONLY SAYING THAT TO WIN VOTES AND SHE KNOW SHE CANT DO IT. ITS ALL TALK

B Dogg   March 10th, 2008 9:19 pm ET

You really get to know a candidate when they are campaining. So far we can put together that Hillary will lie, she will belittle Obama. All of this for her political career. I truly don't believe she really cares about all Americans. It's all about her.

LB   March 10th, 2008 9:18 pm ET

DEFINITELY NO JOINT TICKET!!!

Hillary is usng Senator Obama to get votes... telling voters if you vote for me first you could get a chance to vote for both of us. Outrageous!!!!
I have gone beyond losing all respect for Hillary Clinton and will not be voting for any ticket that she is on!!

Tacheel   March 10th, 2008 9:18 pm ET

I've been a die-hard Democrat all my life but Obama amazes me. The more he talks the less I like him. Good enough to be President but too good to be Vice-President? Let's just step back and crown you king and let you rule forever . . . maybe THAT would make you happy.

Jake   March 10th, 2008 9:18 pm ET

I disagree with you Jake. You must be a Hillary Supporter who don't realize that the Billary's will do anything they can do to get into the white house, and she is resulting to whatever it takes to do so. How can you trust someone like this. Most people who pay attention this democratic battle, are delusional if they can not see what the clintons are doing.

Personally I am tired of Hillary and her bickering and she is the one who is destroying the democratic party to the point if she was to win the nomination, 70 % of Obamas backers will not support her even if he was on the ticket with her. She knows this but she don'[t care because she rather tear the party apart rather than build it up.

Then, Hillary always talking about her experience and what shes done in the white house. If shes done so much why is she holding up the process and blaming the Bush Administration for the hold which after the debate she lied during, the Bush Administration put out the truth. What about the Clintons tax returns they are not release with all the oil money they have made.

The American people are just ready for change and all the bull crap that Hillary will continue to throw.

OBAMA
EDWARDS
2008

AJ, IL   March 10th, 2008 9:18 pm ET

Obama has to be quick on the draw to rebuke Hillary's brand of politics. First and foremost, Obama is the leader in total delegates, pledged delegates, contests won, and total popular vote. Hillary needs the Obama factor alot more than Obama needs Hillary's baggage. If Obama is the nominee, who would he select as VP? One guess is an older military type such as Virginia Sen. Jim Webb. The other is a woman governor such as Kansas Governor Kathleen Sebelius. She is an intelligent well-spoken leader with experience running a state. More importantly, she could really solidify the woman vote for Democrats among those women who wanted to see a woman president or vice president.

Obama / Sebelius in 08!
OR
Obama / Webb in 08!

Chris Mannoia   March 10th, 2008 9:17 pm ET

Obviously, this "dream team" talk is a Clinton campaign move to put the idea of the inevitablity of Hillary Clinton's Presidency.

Not so; Obama is ahead in delegates, popular vote, and states won; he should be the next President of the United States.

If HRC wins the nomination, I think that he will come under great pressure from his supporters, the DNC, the Clintons, and black leaders who understand how high the Senator has come, and how far he can still go.

No matter what happens, Senator Obama has a great future ahead!

Catrina, Bay Area, CA.   March 10th, 2008 9:17 pm ET

Talk about arrogant. Who is winning in delegates here? Come on people this is so manipulative and arrogant. Why aren't more people seeing right through her? We don't see Obama pulling stunts like this.
Oh wait that's right, because he's in this for the RIGHT reasons.

OBAMA "08

annette   March 10th, 2008 9:16 pm ET

I am so pleased, this Spitser deal came out just now. How do you deal with this Hilly?
Mr. Obama, will as usual have the most gentleman way of dealing with this. If it was not Mr. Obama running against what's her face she would be off the agenda by now.

We cannot afford 4 more years of G.W.Bush   March 10th, 2008 9:15 pm ET

A vote for Hillary is a vote for McCain. Hillary is very thirsty but nothing other than power will quench her thirst. She is not a monster. What about a dragon? this one fits better!!!

Democrats it's time to wake up!! Hillary is leading us to the cliff.

James   March 10th, 2008 9:15 pm ET

Hillary is unliked by most Americans. In fact many just hate the Clintons.

She thinks she can use Obama's star power and broad appeal to cheat and steal her way to the white house.

I'm glad Obama said no. He's the DNCs only hope to win against the likable McCain.

So the DNC superdelegates now have a choice. STEAL the nomination from the voters and give it to 14-state loser Hillary and lose in November to that "Maverick".

Or give it to Obama and have a good chance of not only winning but winning big around the 50 states.

Is the DNC stupid/suicidal? We'll see.

Michael, Baghdad   March 10th, 2008 9:14 pm ET

Hillary can definately do better.

If she can convince Al Gore to be her VP running mate, that would be an unstoppable ticket!

If Obama can't win by delegate count before it get to the hands of the DNC, he won't win.

With the vast experience of Bill clinton backing her, that is a fact that would be extremely hard for the Dems to ignore. Especially if she can convince Al Gore to join her on the ticket.

That is a triple-threat combination that McCain would not be able to overcome. You can't argue with 24 years of combined White House exerience, versus Obama's none!

Anonymous   March 10th, 2008 9:14 pm ET

Obamah getting to cockey. This is just a beginning , Just like Bush, if he do win he's going to disappoint a lot of people. I can see it coming, my now will go to Hillary.

Man, he can sell a head off a nickle!

Benny Brown
Jacksonville Fla.

mike   March 10th, 2008 9:13 pm ET

Although Obama won more state, I think Hillary leads the popular vote if Michigan and Florida counts. Obama is misunderstanding what Hillary mean. Whoever win the DNC nominee, should take the other into VP. Yes we don't know yet who gonna win, it can be Obama-Hillary or vice versa, but if Obama want to take Oprah instead as a VP. He gonna lose it in November.

Sorry guys...it's time for change   March 10th, 2008 9:13 pm ET

It is unfortunate that the democratic candidates can not REALLY take the gloves off for the fear of giving the republicans ammo...because honestly....the Clintons have been involved in SCANDALS for years.

They have already played the Rezko card on Barack and hmmmm... sorry Hillary the only thing you are beating OBAMA in is SCANDAL!!

The numbers don't lie!

WISDOM   March 10th, 2008 9:13 pm ET

To those of you die hard Billary supporters who are saying that will vote for McCain if Billary losses.... Well it's totally up to you. No body is stooping it. But just remember what you did to this country and tell your kids about what you did. Hillary is such a double standard in every aspect. I just can't believe people are so simple enough to believe everything Hillary says. I think people with a minimum intelligence could figure out what she said is contradictory.

If Obama is not ready for the president, how can he be good enough to be the VP? Sometimes, it makes me wonder: Does Hillary really think public are so stupid?

A. B. Conacher   March 10th, 2008 9:12 pm ET

The voting was held and the votes should count as they were taken. Having a revisitation of the original vote would be a ridiculous waste of time and money. Voters in Michigan and Florida should be able to have their voices heard and their votes counted: disenfranchising these people would be unethical and unconscionable.

Brian   March 10th, 2008 9:12 pm ET

Politics is politics... and most politicians are what people would call crooked. Hillary is a politician and her political stunts make sense. If the delegates were switched around the Obama campaign would be doing the exact same.

I've been a Clinton supporter since John Edwards was out and I will stay with her. I believe that Former Pres. Clinton did wonderful a wonderful job as President and that Hillary can do the same.

As a Democrat, I have to say that if Obama gets the DEM Nominee there will be a check next to McCain name on the ballot.

Where is the DNC?   March 10th, 2008 9:12 pm ET

People – especially Florida and Michigan voters: Did anyone catch Senator McGaskell tonight on CNN? It seems that the defacto position of the Obama campaign is to let the current situation regarding Florida and Michigan stand. They're not taking any active role. They must have done some polling that shows that redos would again favor Clinton. Officially, they'll say that this belongs in the lap of the DNC. The DNC's position is that the candidates and the states need to put together a plan. REMEMBER EVERYONE – Obama's position is to disenfranchise the millions who voted and deny them the opportunity to have their votes counted in a redo.

p.s., Is she one of the emerging women in the Democratic party? I'm not impressed.

Bill C   March 10th, 2008 9:12 pm ET

is it possible that mr. goody-two-shoes Eliot Spitzer is a felon ? He
ought to fit right in with Billary and the Chicago-mob connections of
Obama. Pelosi ought to be having tantrums that the dems are now
the party that is the king (or should I say queen) of sleaze ? Just like
Geraldine Ferraro's hubbie had ties to the NYC mob. birds of a feather know how to flock together. Time for McCain to find the jugular...

Jay   March 10th, 2008 9:12 pm ET

Carole in Canada, if you're including Michigan and Florida in that count, fuhgetaboutit! If those states end up counting, it won't be by January's primaries...they're poisoned.

SKC   March 10th, 2008 9:11 pm ET

Both Senators Obama and Clinton have to be very careful in the VP argument. On one hand, an Obama ticket without Clinton can open up an opportunity for Senator McCain to select a white woman who can attract Hillary's female votes. On the other hand, a Clinton ticket without an Obama could encourage McCain to select an African American VP, even if that choice is Condi. Still, it seems the debate on the Democratic side is more of personalities than issues. Raising taxes on the rich and raising the minimum wage is no serious economic agenda. And surrender from Iraq is equally dumb...but MAC is probably not ready and was actually not expecting to be nominated NOW. May be he, too, can wait till after Chuck Norris?

Michelle   March 10th, 2008 9:11 pm ET

Hillary is so sad. I suppose there is someone dumb enough to fall for this, probably more than I dare think about. She is sad, pathetic and totally despicable :-)

She is trying to mind screw people. Sadly it works on some.

B Dogg   March 10th, 2008 9:11 pm ET

I really liked Hillary until I got to know what kind of person, and candidate she really is.

dee kay   March 10th, 2008 9:11 pm ET

FORGET OBAMA.....WHO WANTS HIM ANYWAY. WHAT A DEVISIVE CANDIDATE.

HILLARY, JUST WIN IT AND THEN SHOVE IT DOWN OBAMA'S THROAT.

YOU HAVE MY VOTE HILLARY.

JAMES IN BAMA   March 10th, 2008 9:11 pm ET

I THINK THAT IT ALL PLAYS INTO HILLARY'S HAND BECAUSE PEOPLE SEE THE WAY THINGS ARE. AND THAT IS, THAT OBAMA AS ENERGETIC AND WITH ALL HIS HOPE AND CHANGE SPEACHES JSUT IS NOT READY TO TAKE ON MCCAIN, AND THEY SEE IT AS A WIN WIN FOR THE PARTY TO HAVE OBAMA AS V.P. THEY KNOW OBAMA IS NOT ELECTABLE AGAINST MCCAIN AND HILLARY CAN TAKE WHAT THE REPUBLICANS LIKE MCCAIN AND ROVE CAN DISH OUT. OBAMA IS NOT A BAD PERSON, BUT BECAUSE OF HIS TOTAL LACK OF EXPERINCE HE IS NOT ABLE TO COUNTER THE ATTACKS (ALTHOUGH VERY LIGHT SO FAR) THAT HAVE COME HIS WAY. AND I DONT THINK THAT HE WILL STAND MUCH OF A CHANCE IF THE REPUBLICANS PUT FORTH ANY EFFORT ON PUSHING THE ISSUES AND QUESTION HIS EXPERIENCE, QUALIFICATIONS, OR HIS STANCE ON MANY TOUGH ISSUES THAT ARE OUT THERE. AND WITH HIS NAFTA-CANADA DEAL, AND THE FACT THAT SPEACHES ABOUT CHANGE AND HOPE WILL NOT DEFLECT EVERY OTHER POINT BROUGHT UP BY ANYONE WHO IS AGAINST HIM, I THINK HE IS A MUCH WEAKER CANNIDATE THAN MANY PEOPLE SEE HIM AS. EVEN WITH THE BIG BLOWS HE HAS TAKEN FROM HILLARY, AND HER NOT SEAMING TO WANT TO PUSH HIM TO MUCH ON IT. I THINK MCCAIN WILL BREAK HIM UNDER THE PRESSURE IF HE IS PUT THERE. SO LETS GET HILLARY THERE TO FIGHT IT OUT AGAINST MCCAIN, AND ASK OBAMA TO GIVE US SOME HOPE AS A V.P. AND THEN IN 4-8 YEARS WHEN HE CAN SEE WHAT IT TAKES TO GET THERE WE CAN PUT HIM UP AND EXPECT HIM TO WIN. AND A FURTHER NOTE. LETS RE-DO IF POSSIBLE THE MICHIGAN PRIMARY, IT WAS NOT FAIR THE FIRST TIME. AND AS FAR AS THE FLROIDA CONTEST, I DONT SEE HOW IT COULD HAVE BEEN ANY FAIRER. NO ONE CAMPAINGED, MADE APPEARENCES, OR HAD ANYTHING TO DO WITH IT AND THE POEPLE VOTED. EVERYONES NAMES WERE ON THE BALLETS. SO LET THOSE VOTES AND DELEGATES STAND WHERE THEY WERE CAST!!! AND NO MATTER WHAT, WE HAVE TO SEAT ALL OF THE FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN DELEGATS EVEN IF THERE IS NO RE-DO. WE NEED THEM THERE TO SETTLE THIS OUT, AND THE QUICKER THE BETTER!! THANKS.

Bob, Kapaa, HI   March 10th, 2008 9:11 pm ET

This just confirms the Clintons will do anything, say anything, to try and hoodwink the American voter. Absolutely ridiculous.

I am a big Obama fan, but if Hillary ends up on this ticket, in any position, I will vote for John McCain.

Adam in Pittsburg   March 10th, 2008 9:09 pm ET

To the poster above....Senator Nelson from Florida supported the move that led to the loss of delegates from his state. He should be fired by the voters in Florida because he helped them lose that right. Florida voters are smarter than that and are not blaming the DNC, the RNC, the republican governor, Obama, Clinton, Edwards, Bush, etc. They need to place the blame on the people who wanted to move the primary, which is every democratic member who voted to approve the move.

Gina   March 10th, 2008 9:09 pm ET

From Boston,
Here's the quote:
'Hillary Clinton told a CBS interviewer earlier this week, shortly after she ended a string of 11 losses with wins in Texas, Ohio and Rhode Island, that a joint ticket "may be where this is headed. But of course we have to decide who is on the top of ticket. I think the people of Ohio very clearly said that it should be me."

Bryan in VA   March 10th, 2008 9:09 pm ET

Why is the Clinton News Network proclaiming a Texas victory for Clinton? Obama won more total delegates in Texas!!!

Frank, Dayton, Ohio   March 10th, 2008 9:09 pm ET

Exactly what was the Clinton campaign expecting Obama to do, embrace them and say "oh, yay, I get to run for VICE president with Hillary"?!!

Good for you, Barack Obama, for calling her bluff on this!

Kate   March 10th, 2008 9:08 pm ET

Good for him. Don't take the bait.

Obama's vision for America does not include the ugly, divisive tactics of HRC's.

He is not going to play the "sidekick" figure that HRC and her old white crowd think that minorities should play. You know, like that asian boy in Raiders of the Lost Ark, or the black partner to the white cop. Sorry, he will not be the "bone" that HRC throws to the African American community in a spirit of tokenism.

Hillary can not win mathematically. She can't catch up. She;s hoping to try to steal the nomination in the back room. Problem is, if the first AA candidate in US history is robbed, the AA community (not to mention the millions of young people) will sit out November. She is guaranteed a loss if she steals it. By refusing to allow her to steal the nomination and put him as VP to quell the outrage, he is calling her bluff.

Matt from NH   March 10th, 2008 9:07 pm ET

this is once again a poor attempt for hillary to try to look like a president. She is pretty much a joke now, all day my friends and i Laugh about her new attempts. We are thinking of starting a pool to see what comes next. this is exciting politics...lol

Mandi Locke   March 10th, 2008 9:06 pm ET

Hillary Clinton needs a major reality check. She knows that there is NO way that she can capture the nomination unless she continues to play dirty and grasp at political straws. Wake up, Hillary! You won't be at the top of ANY ticket this fall and hopefully Obama is smart enough not to ask you to be his VP. Disgusting politics equals disgusted public opinion.

Hank in PA   March 10th, 2008 9:06 pm ET

I agree that Hillary could do much better in a VP Choice. JOhn Edwards is a real live public servant with the kind of experience America needs.

Obama needs to replace his slogan - yes we can - it really is more like - yes I can - as his past dealing make it clear that he is in it for himself, not for the good of the country.

Smart Men for Hillary '08

James   March 10th, 2008 9:05 pm ET

Obama may be winning more states and delegates, but he isn't winning the majority of the Democratic base. Clinton is.

This is an election to choose who will represent the Democratic party in the general election for President, and Obama does not represent the party. His followers are mostly new voters, independants, Republican cross-overs, and of coarse, the African-American community who are supporting him just because he is half black. They've abandoned Hillary (who they strongly favored before Obama became a household name), because they are voting with their hearts rather then their heads. I understand it. But when you add up all his supporters, again, they are not the Democratic base, and it's the superdelegates job to protect the party and the base.

Obama permanently placed a wedge between his supporters and those of Clintons today by flatly rejecting the idea of being Clintons VP. At least she recognizes we need the ENTIRE party to win in November, but Obamas arrogance showed all of us Democrats that he is more concerned about himself then the party, and if he is our nominee, half the party will walk away from him and the DNC, and McCain will win.

Adam in Pittsburg   March 10th, 2008 9:05 pm ET

Hillary needs more real leadership experience. She should run for Governor of New York considering her superdelegate friend will be stepping down in the next few hours.

Tony   March 10th, 2008 9:04 pm ET

my family has 6 votes, if not for Hillary, they will go to Mccain. it is called the silent majority. good luck to all.

Adam in Pittsburg   March 10th, 2008 9:04 pm ET

NO DREAM TICKET FOR YOU CLINTON LOVERS. IF YOU STEAL THIS NOMINATION, YOU WILL NOT HAVE OBAMA AS YOUR VEEP. YOU WILL THEN LOSE TO MCCAIN IN NOVEMBER AND OBAMA WILL RUN AGAIN IN 2012 AT AGE 50 AND WIN THE WHITE HOUSE.

IF WE DEMOCRATS LOSE THE WHITE HOUSE IN 2008, YOU WILL HAVE BILL AND HILLARY TO THANK JUST LIKE IN 2000 WHEN GORE LOST ARKANSAS AND TENNESSEE.

Lovell Sewell   March 10th, 2008 9:04 pm ET

Hi, Bloggers

Here I go again have to give people a reality check.
First Clinton supporters I am getting to point that everyone of you not a real Democrat because if that would have been Obama that lost 11 straight states and won only the big ones Democrat would have been thrown him over aboard. You all this is not fair but instead of admitting it you will stand by your supporter. If any you was in sport and your candidate was winning and someone came and took it from them you can not tell me you will not be upset. We need to stop belittling our candidates and stand for them when they are wrong and when they are right.

1. Let’s compare the beginning of this race Michigan and Florida was stripped of their delegates. Obama and Hillary knew this and the Governors of these states knew. Not one was concern about the people now thanks to Hillary because she wants the votes want to seat these delegates. After now she is loosing. Why was neither Governor Kris nor Governor Granholm worrying about the people in their states then? Also, where was Hillary Clinton?

2. Hillary Clinton wants the super delegates to erase the popular vote from delegates sign by states. Now she saying even the ones that voted in states can change their minds.

3. Hillary Clinton brought up Obama being her VP. Trying to lie for she can pick up Obama voters.

4. Hillary Clinton going to say her and McCain has long life experience Obama don't. When ask to prove she dodge the answer. Along with not furnishing her tax records and who furnish Bill Clinton library.

5. The media trying to tie Obama with Rizko, but now we have a Govenor Spitzer of New York who endorses Hillary Clinton and with one voice saying she will pray for his family and with the same voice take all the fundraising he did off her website. I wonder if she going to give back all the money he gave her campaign. Obama had to for Rizko and that was just a friend, here we have a Governor and they are friends. So how many friends she has that do dirt why everyone try to slang Obama for his friends.

I am not saying we going to loose because people want vote for Hillary like some of her people saying about Obama people. I am saying here is dirty politics at it best and I hear people speak on Change and yet let the Clinton use our party anyway they want. This should not be called Democrat party this needs to be called the CLINTONS PARTY. This is the reason she will have a hard time winning.

Dave   March 10th, 2008 9:04 pm ET

Re: America the Beautiful-
Check Hillary's long track record of scandals. It is commonly agreed that she is the most divisive candidate, indeed the polls show Obama with an edge against McCain.

from chicago   March 10th, 2008 9:04 pm ET

Being from ILL. Please tell me what he has done for my State? I myself haven't seen it. Oprah tells every-one he's great , but I still don't see it. When Bill Clinton was in office, I thought the economy looked good, people from every race seemed too be happy, most had a job making a avg. income. The country was strong & the seemed too be moving in the right way. I do support Hillary , hoping Bill would lend support if need be. I feel Barack is not ready for this task. Because you sign people up too vote in my book won't make him strong enough too beat McCain let alone run this country.no ill feelings toward Barack or his family. this country needs too unite too get this country back too the super power it once was. We don't want Ted Kennedy teaching Barack on how too run the White House. Pushing him on un-popular bills he wants too get through the Senate.

Nina   March 10th, 2008 9:04 pm ET

Hey Jude – Not this blue.
I hope Hillary comes to her senses and doesn't degrade herself by being on the same ticket with Obama.
If the youngsters of the US are so obsessed with this Pied Piper they vote him in – I want Hillary in the Senate, or better yet, as a Supreme Court Justice.
This life long Dem will see and vote red if the Piper gets the nod.

Oh, and before you spout off on Hillary's supporters being ignorant, I am a Mensan.

Clare   March 10th, 2008 9:03 pm ET

the Clintons are only voicing out what many of us believe to the case. the obama followers call Hillary arrogan and with a sense of entitlement. What makes you think that obama is not suffering from the same? he is arrogant to think that he can be the president of the US just because he is cashing in the discontent with the present president. he talks about changes, what changes? what is he going to change? he and his followers want ALL of the democratic votes, yet he does not think about the party or that matter the country. His candidady is all self-serving his ego. threatening people that this is "our only chance" to vote for him. If you truly are a dedicated individual to your country and truly believe that we need to change, then you persist.

Hillary will never benefit from having obama as vp. he would. not only the obama followers need to wake up and see reality, more importantly obama has to wake up.

CNN stopped censoring my comments.

Just the Facts   March 10th, 2008 9:03 pm ET

SHe is according to the CNN report "fueling the idea"…I say she can put all the gas she wants in this car but it isn't going anywhere!

Speak for yourself!   March 10th, 2008 9:02 pm ET

Senator Obama does not represent the people in America who believe that the government is owned by the people....or if you think that – explain his position then (which is opposite what you wrote) to the voters in Michigan and Florida? Is that not for his own political gain that those votes NOT count? So much for the government owned by the people...LOL!!!

I will not vote for Senator Obama if he is #1 on the ticket. I do not support nuclear weapons and Senator Obama does. I do not support anyway that parrots their opponent and then twists words to be their own and I certainly do not support anyone who insists on playing 'follow the leader' when they want to play leader. Who would they follow then?

He is just too inexperienced and green. His campaign mgmt has huge flaws (Canada, IRAQ) and they made a major error in Michigan by willfully taking his name off the ballot. Now that was just void of thought.

So just speak for yourselves instead of the blanket statements that only show your own naive and ignorant manners.

Gina   March 10th, 2008 9:02 pm ET

From Boston,
In an article posted here by CNN Clinton was quoted as saying that "they would have to decide who would be on top and that the people in Ohio have cleary stated they thought it should be her."
That pretty much sounds like she thinks she should be on top to me.

priscilla   March 10th, 2008 9:02 pm ET

HILLARY HILLARY JUST WHEN I THINK YOU HAVE PULLED YOUR DIRTIEST TRICK YOU SURPRISE ME WITH YOUR NEW LOWEST LOW!!! I WILL NEVER VOTE FOR HILLARY AND I KNOW MANY DEMS WHO FEEL THE SAME WAY... IF YOU GUYS FALL FOR THIS ONE... I HAVE A BRIDGE I WANT TO SELL TO YOU..... ITS NO WONDER HILLARY SUPPORTERS ARE NOT AS SMART AS OBAMA SUPPORTERS YOU GUYS NEED TO USE YOUR NOGGIN!!!!!!

OBAMA!!!!!!!!!!!!

ct   March 10th, 2008 9:02 pm ET

I agree with Wayne -well put.
"Obama's arrogance is getting more than a bit annoying! First he says he won't run for president again if he doesn't win this time, now its how he won't even consider being vice president. It's he's way or no way (an attitude we've had in the White House for 8 years now already). I begin to see why so many Hillary supporters are saying they would vote for McCain rather .................."

this is how he cares for poeple and this country? Translation: if he will not get elected, he will just forget it all... we do not want someone like this to be a president. How arrogant, how rude to people.

And Clintons just go from what people say.

I do feel this crazy push to vote for Obama – or..... or what?

Bill   March 10th, 2008 9:02 pm ET

When you look at the current state of affairs anyone with any common sense would realize that experience is not getting the job done. Our economy is in shambles; Americans are losing jobs; illegal immigration is out of control and is a major drain on our economy etc. Additionally, Hillary has demonstrated that the only thing important in this race is preserving her own self interests. The tactics that she is employing against Obama are without merit and lack any real substance and is viewed as very divisive to the Democratic party that is the best position to get us out of this fiasco created by the current administration. Further, when Florida and Michigan moved their primaries up their administration knew or should have known of the consequences of that decision. The only reason Hillary want to seat the delegates is because she believe those states have the swing votes to propel her into the oval office. Hillary represents the old guard and it is time for real change. Vote with your conscience or we will all be doomed if we are not willing to act and think outside the box. We need politicians that represent the American people and not their own self interests.

Andrea   March 10th, 2008 9:01 pm ET

I am very disturbed at the nasty, vicious rhetoric that I see coming from Obama supporters every day. For supporters of someone who supposedly stands for unity, you sure do a hell of a job representing your case to the other half of the party. I know it just drives you wild but half of this party supports Senator Clinton. She is a fine candidate, with many years in public policy and public service. Senator Obama is also a good candidate. A joint ticket would unite the party and make us unstoppable in November.

If I have to hear much more of this misogynistic, whiny crap, I do not think I will be able to bring myself to vote for Senator Obama should he become the nominee.

Jim Williams   March 10th, 2008 9:01 pm ET

Actual Texas Results give Obama 6 delegate win!

Obama Total Earned Delegates 99
Caucus Delegates 38 Primary Delegates 61

Clinton Total Earned Delegates 94
Caucus Delegates 29 Primary Delegates 65

Actually, if you include both the caucus vote and the primary vote together, Mr. Obama not only wins the delegate math, but also the popular vote in Texas. Obama won by tens of thousands of votes cast. If you have a problem with counting the caucus vote in the popular total, then you have a problem with the sate democratic party.

The American Voice

Susan   March 10th, 2008 9:00 pm ET

People are obsessed with the fact that Obama has 99 more delegates at this point than Clinton but COME ON GUYS, do the math: THAT IS A DIFFERENCE OF LESS THAN 1% IN THE NUMBER OF DELEGATES BETWEEN THEM.

The fact of the matter is, Obama has not reached the number of delegates required for the nomination and when Pennsylvania, Florida and Michigan get to weigh in, he is going to see his slight lead disappear. So, I think it would be best if he checked his arrogance at the door and refrained from counting anything out at this time.

scbrown   March 10th, 2008 9:00 pm ET

Didn't the Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick endorse OBama.

Detroit Mayor refuses to resign because of his current sex scandal and alleged illegal acts.

I believe he is a superdelegate. Michigan delegates don't count, maybe this is the reason why the obama camp dont want them to count.

KC, Texas   March 10th, 2008 9:00 pm ET

I don't like the "dream ticket" idea, 'cause Obama has too many unknown issues with Tony Rezko, Illinois heath board corruption, and he said one thing about NAFTA and Iraq war and then told foreign officials that it's just "polictical positioning".

Obama is not qualified for VP.

Politix88   March 10th, 2008 8:59 pm ET

Hillary Clinton can't win the nomination on her own. This is why she's pushing the idea of a joint ticket that has no basis in reality. If you were in first place during a contest, would you tell the second place finisher that you'd be happy to take second place instead? If you said someone's terrible for a job, why would you hire them as a back-up? Come on – now, this is a fairy tale!

It's too bad Hillary Clinton doesn't think she has what it takes to win the nomination on her own. Maybe that's a self-esteem issue she should work on, while she remains the junior Senator from the State of NY. It just doesn't sound like she has the confidence to be the President right now. Maybe she should wait 8 more years.

Cathy   March 10th, 2008 8:59 pm ET

Hillary realizes the ONLY way many of us would hold our noses and vote for her is if Obama was also on the ticket. But, Obama won't hold his nose and run with her - he knows that she is a HUGE liability to his presidency and would be the fastest way of ensuring the Republicans keep the White House.

Hillary wins Republican votes because of "the plot" to have her run against McCain - no matter who wins the election, they win.

Obama wins Republican votes because they're sick of the petty divisiveness of the two-party system and want to move away from voting for a party to voting for a candidate instead.

See the difference? Obama doesn't just unite Democrats, he unites Americans.

Christian Detres   March 10th, 2008 8:59 pm ET

I personally resent the tabloid "Spy vs. Spy" campaign coverage CNN is indulging in. Obama clearly said he is not RUNNING for the VP, saying he is in this race to win it. He did NOT say that he would not accept the position if it was rightfully offered in the event of Hillary gaining the nomination. There are a lot of people out there that believe in the possibility of this ticket – and look forward to it. Of course, there are many that don't. To Obama supporters that don't, I clearly understand the umbrage you take at such hubris on Hillary's part. The offer is ill-timed (at least in the sense of fair-play) and clearly politically motivated. She is saying what a lot of people are thinking though, and Bill's "unstoppable" comment is, for better or worse, absolutely true. So I call on Democrats – and more importantly on those that would do anything to keep another Republican out of office – to give the idea some thought. I think you'll find it to be an intelligent decision for the party and for this country.

HILLLARY 08   March 10th, 2008 8:59 pm ET

How long are you going to leave my comments on moderation CNN? not enough obama supporters on here for you?

Ed   March 10th, 2008 8:59 pm ET

Somebody help me please! Is there a school of presidential experience in America that those aspiring to be president would have to go through before becoming president? While I am still on this, I hear Hillary talk about her experience every other time and one example she talks about is her participation in the women's event in 1997 in China. Americans should know the truth. The women conference brought together women from all walks of life. Uganda for example had a woman vice president, the Irish republic president at the time was also a woman. In protocal therefore a wife of a president in Hillary who would have been representing women of America would be way down the line.

In Northern Ireland, her privilledged position was what was keeping her close to the peace process. Helping mobilize the women is not any diplomatic duties at all. Women emancipation didn't start with Hillary Clinton and she shouldn't be telling Americans the importance of her role in mobilizing that many women around the world do. George's Bush's wife has and still does this from time to time around the world like wise the likes of Tony Blairs wife who has delivered so many intellectual speeches on international stage. It doesn't make any of them experienced in presidential affairs because neither of these work do subject them to the fragile decision making situations great presidents and leaders of the world go through. If Hillary can be so experienced because of her spouse's position, what would we then say about a wife of a man like Nelson Mandella? Winnie has herself struggled against all evils of appathide while herself going through the pains of living without a husband who was incarsurated for 27years.

Americans should demand real substance from a presidential candidate and not some cheap politicking Hillary is touting.

Ed
London, UK

Adam in Pittsburg   March 10th, 2008 8:59 pm ET

This brings up so many memories from the 90's. A powerful male democrat in power sleeping around on the taxpayers dollar.

Why is so many women out there want to support Hillary and place Bill Clinton back in the White House after he lied to the American people and was impeached by the House?

jr.   March 10th, 2008 8:59 pm ET

Wemon of America you'll can make Histori this election the first women president fo the U.S.A. and realy chage the world.

Where is the DNC?   March 10th, 2008 8:58 pm ET

Obama knows what the super delegates know – you can't win in the general election unless you win the reliably Blue states – those that Clinton has won. Obama can play it anyway he wants but the reality is his states – caucuses mostly – are reliably RED states that republicans always win. Democrats are headed for a train wreck if the popular vote remains split. It made sense for Clinton to extend this offer. When voters wake up to the obscene amount of money already poured into this race and the millions for Florida and Michigan to redo their votes, they will be understandably exasperated with the DNC – WHERE ARE THEY!!!

Finally, if Clinton were a man, we'd be ready to coronate her. If Obama were a woman, he never would have made it past the first debate.

Sunny   March 10th, 2008 8:58 pm ET

Hillary knows how to get what she wants.She scheme and manipulate the voters to vote for her.I hope they see it and vote for OBAMA because his real deal.Bring hope and real change the people.If somehow shes become nominee we will vote for Mc Caine because he has best expreiece compare her.

Kevin   March 10th, 2008 8:57 pm ET

She is really awful.

And it Time. For Her. To Go.

Black Man in Dixie   March 10th, 2008 8:57 pm ET

And I was told that the "intellectual" crowd was voting for Obama? Wouldn't know it by seeing the tone of most of the post for him here.

The republicans still have plenty of tricks (terrorist, gay marriage, taxes, etc...) up their sleeves folks. If we dont' have a darn good ticket, we'll lose in November.

hillary 08:   March 10th, 2008 8:56 pm ET

Hillary can do better than to put a fraud on the ticket. People only vote for obama because they are mad at the Clintons. He is boring, lame and a crock. My vote is for her, will stay with her! PERIOD!

raj   March 10th, 2008 8:56 pm ET

What happen to hillary??? She don't want to answer night call anymore????

Florence   March 10th, 2008 8:56 pm ET

Bill Clinton failed to heed his own counsel when president, and if he has played a role in his wife's campaign, that too has been a failure, judging by the chaotic ups and downs she has suffered. He has armed her by putting his foot in his mouth on many occasions, and their sense of entitlement appears to be their biggest downfall.

The comparisons between the two candidates have been astounding.
Hillary has been shrill, Sen. Obama has been composed.
Where Hillary's temper has been all over the map with her crying and screaming, he has maintained his dignity.
She called attention to her lack of shame when she said shame on him. As an ex-president, Bill has more than abased himself and the post he held by insulting Sen. Obama.
It seems that Sen. Obama has proven already that he might be in a better position to teach them both, while Hillary and Bill just cannot do anything right.

Judge   March 10th, 2008 8:54 pm ET

US has enough from unexprienced presidents. Let's acknowledge that we need somebody with making well thought decisions for US. Let's also acknowledge that Obama is better on rhetorics. Finally, who are we going to elect for President of USA – A qualified person or a public speaker? You like both? Let's set the right priorities...qualification #1, speaker #2. Thanks.

fuzzi   March 10th, 2008 8:54 pm ET

Barack Obama is 220 Second to none nice try Hillary.

Jack   March 10th, 2008 8:54 pm ET

Yes she does, some politicians always benefitted from blantant hypocrisy and do whatever it takes, some politicians controlling and power comes before their party and their country. They deal with devil if required. I hope CNN also stops this rediculous headlines about clinton obam ticket, clinon obama, obama no 2 etc etc. Who you fooling?

Ron Switzer   March 10th, 2008 8:54 pm ET

Why can't any of you come up with real questions that make a difference.
The truth is we are all so alienated that the frustration of common people have no effect on politicians or the news-media at all.
Fathers who pay child support get no tax relief, the quality of life and the possibility of retirement is just becoming a dream.
Help is nowhere in sight.
I can't believe we have no voice.

California Voter   March 10th, 2008 8:53 pm ET

I think so; if about 70 percent of a recent poll favored such a ticket. However, neither candidate is in a position to name a VP at this point.

And Jude, red states and blue states do make a difference in the general election. Remember the democratic primaries and caucuses distribute delegates proportionally. In the general election, it is winner take all. Go to real clear politics and work it out for yourself!

Anna D.   March 10th, 2008 8:51 pm ET

CNN – YOU ARE DISGUSTING. YOU ARE SO FOR OBAMA THAT HILLARY ONLY GETS A GOOD POINT EVERY 8 OR 9 COMMENTS. I KNOW THIS TO BE UNFAIR BECAUSE I HAVE WATCHED EVERY SINGLE POLITICAL PIECE PUT OUT. IF OBAMA SAYS SOMETHING, YOU REPORT IT WITH 40 PARAGRAPHS. IF HILLARY SAYS OR DOES SOMETHING, SHE GETS A 3 SECOND PARAGRAPH. YOU HAVE LOST A LIFELONG VIEWER OVER YOUR UNBALANCED REPORTING. I HAVE SWITCHED TO FOX. THEY REALLY ARE FAIR AND BALANCED. HILLARY WILL WIN THE BID AND THE WHITE HOUSE AND I HOPE AND PRAY SHE ISN'T FOOLISH ENOUGH TO PUT OBAMA'S NAME ON THE TICKET. SHE DOESN'T NEED HIS INEXPERIENCED FLIRTATIONS. HE HAS BOYISH CHARM AND NOTHING TO BACK IT UP.

v.ananthan   March 10th, 2008 8:50 pm ET

WE don^t want OBAMA as vice president for HILLARY...

We want somebody like Edwards ....

-Hillary supporter.

Grif   March 10th, 2008 8:50 pm ET

The way I see it, and I guess I also was a dominant father.
Still Hillary Clinton was born into a Republican Family, who inurn married into a Democratic Family.
Consequently, say's Hillary carry on, Why? She is running for Office now, William had his chance..

Hillary also has obligations to her own roots. She want's what best for the World she inherited.
Don't you dare to blame her, when it's you want control ...

Well not of Hillary, and the future she wants for her AMERICA!!!!

I suppose, I should leave my own Signature...... Grif!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Frank, Ft. Lauderdale   March 10th, 2008 8:50 pm ET

Now the Clinton's are playing the ultimate political game (and they are truly master politicians–just what we don't need running this country any longer). The game is called "Make everyone think your opponent is secondary–tinge of racism??–and that you are the leader and soon all the sheep will follow in your path." I certainly hope that in this day and age that the American people are smart enough to see through this desperation act by the Clintons. Hey Hillary, while you're at it, why don't you hand pick right now which states you would like to President of the United States (because it's obvious that you've written off two thirds of the states (that voted for Barack) because only the one third that voted for you counts). It makes me sick to my stomach that you choose the States that matter (those that delusionally voted for you), while the other States are just swept to the side like foolish, little children.

Chris In California   March 10th, 2008 8:50 pm ET

I do not think Hillary Clinton actually made an offer to Barack Obama asking him to be VP on her ticket when she becomes the nominee. But, I think the fact that she has expressed that it is something she has considered was a very decent gesture by Senator Clinton. Barack Obama has lost his momentum and will certainly not gain it back with Mississippi alone. Next will be Pennsylvania and probably Florida and Michigan. These are states Hillary will likely win to continue her momentum. I believe she will be the Democratic nominee when all is said and done. I think Barack Obama having attacked her as he did about her having said that if she becomes the nominee, a Clinton-Obama ticket would be a consideration and a possibility for her. I think Barack Obama should have been more gracious than he was. He could have taken it as it was meant – in a complimentary way – rather than turning around and attacking her as he did.

Arthur-Texas   March 10th, 2008 8:50 pm ET

Obama is being given a golden opportunity.He ahould take the offer to be in Hillarys administration.
While there he could observe the intricate details of the white house and learn how to be a good administrator.
Hillary can teach him how to be a good commander in chief,so when his opportunity to run for president in 8 years he can claim a little experience.

Bob Stephens   March 10th, 2008 8:50 pm ET

Hillary, I am convinced after watching your campaign for the last couple of weeks, that you are very sick lady. How anyone could even think about electing you for President, is beyond me. You couldn't string 2 truthful sentences together if your life depended on it.

Maybe, Barack will give you a job tending the bathrooms in the Whitehouse, so you better start being nice to him.

Nathan Pomeroy   March 10th, 2008 8:50 pm ET

think Hillary has been damaged by the media. All this talk about Obama being all the hope in the world is highly unlikely. Remember when the Clintons was in Office 8 years ago, job rates were at the highest levels ever and the world a great respect for America. You can talk about race if you would like, but with 90% of African Americans voting for Obama it isn’t because of Hope it is race. If you talk to the people on the streets you will realize that African Americans find that this is their shinning star (Obama) to take over America. If I was a betting man I would bet you that if Obama takes the decratics over Hillary his running mate with be another African American

Wayne   March 10th, 2008 8:50 pm ET

Nobody wants the VP job with Hillary and Bill. Obama is not the first to shoot it down. Biden shot it down as well.

J. Wright   March 10th, 2008 8:49 pm ET

Hillary, give up already, we can see right through you. You are contradicting yourself and making yourself look bad.

Thank goodness Obama cleared up the V.P. speculation. She is just trying to trick people to vote for her under the falsehood that Obama could be her V.P.

After the mess this election has become, I don't see them working together in the White House. Furthermore, Hillary does not have the ability to unite the country. Her nomination would be the best thing that could ever happen to McCain.

ml   March 10th, 2008 8:49 pm ET

maybe Obama was just being tested? And came out as arrogant as always......not the uniter, not democrat, not thinking about the nation, just himself.
why he thinks he is the one? What is so great on him? What people see in him? I see no leader, just this arrogant, selfish man who does not see people or nation, but himself – his picture in WH, maybe it is his wife push?
What in Earth makes hi think so overly highly about himself? Some humbleness, and modest would be beneficial to him and his wife.
It is so much arrogancy in Obama's campaign, how come people do not see it? He is so much power thirsty, so much to be the"one", well, I am afraid he is the "one" history will not be proud of.

tom   March 10th, 2008 8:49 pm ET

This is the latest example of Clintons doing whatever they can to win. If she wins the nomination, I will vote Republican even though I'm a life long Democrat. In fact I'll try to start a Democrats for McCain movement. She is a vicious back stabbing almost human being that should consider another line of work.

Sandra from Ohio   March 10th, 2008 8:48 pm ET

Here we go again Hilliary Clinton one of her superdelegates is involved in illegal sex scam surprise!!! surprise!!! And this is someone that you want as president no one learned any thing from the Clinton era? We need change from the good old boys and girls better wise up America Obama 08

HCheng   March 10th, 2008 8:48 pm ET

Obama can turn Hillary's trick on itself.

How about float the idea of appointing Bill Clinton the Secretary of State to continue his peace effort in the middle East?

And create a new cabinet position for Women's Afffairs under his presidency and consider Hillary on the short list?

Obama got more than one million votes than Hillary. Time for him to do some trash talk too!

jr.   March 10th, 2008 8:48 pm ET

Mr. Obama you say you have always been against the war but you voted for the funding of the war you are eithr againts it or for it. you can not have it both ways. You must think the young people are so naeive.

Thomas H.   March 10th, 2008 8:46 pm ET

WHY ISN"T ANYONE SEEING THAT CLINTON WOULD NOT OFFER THE VP SLOT IF SHE REALLY THOUGHT SHE COULD WIN. SHE CAN"T SO SHE"S TRYING TO CON OBAMA...

Malloy   March 10th, 2008 8:46 pm ET

How sad I feel right now, This is so like George McGovern all over again. A great speaker and superb at getting the non-political wishful thinkers to back him. However, for those of you who are not students of history, George went down in flames; taking the Democrats with him. Yes, I voted for McGovern. So did all the true believers. But politics at this level is not about cheerleaders, If it was simply about getting a bright person with great ideas to lead our party, then we would not have had W destroying our country and the lives of so many people for the last 7 years.

Arthur-Texas   March 10th, 2008 8:46 pm ET

Obama is being given a golden opportunity.He ahould take the offer to be in Hillarys administration.

Achille   March 10th, 2008 8:46 pm ET

A looser saying to a winner, I'll offer you the VP slot.
It's simply MONSTERIOUS.

Rosemary Storaska   March 10th, 2008 8:45 pm ET

Obama has done the last inexcusable thing! Right now on CNN a camp representative is “spinning” the dilemma over Michigan and Florida has a negative thing against Clinton. When asked what “her problem was” over both candidates paying and outside contributors paying so that thousands of people have their votes count, she said, “Obama will do what the party agrees to do” as we follow the rules. Did I not see for myself that Obama ran campaign ads in Florida? When asked how they felt about the people of MI and FL she only responded that Obama cares about them. Hugh? He cares but he does not want to “work together” to resolve it? I thought this is what Mr. Obama stands for, “working together” to resolve problems regardless of party? So yes, Hillary promoting the unity theme only brings out what we now all know—Obama has been riding the tails of money and influential people to get where he wants to go and how he gets there has rarely entered into the equation as long as it is benefiting “HIM”. One word about an Obama nomination will send women and many men in this country into the now forming, “Democrats for McCain” column.

Mara   March 10th, 2008 8:45 pm ET

Y'all are behind. See Political Punch. Hillary is apparently unaware that Bill is offering Obama the VP slot. Those Clintons.....

Susan Norton   March 10th, 2008 8:44 pm ET

Does Obama realize that Kennedy and Carter both won the White House without winning the majority of states? If it weren't for the caucuses, Obama wouldn't even be in the race. Hillary is very close in the popular vote (and ahead if one just counts democrats) and if Florida and Michigan were counted or revote, Hillary would be ahead now. Why do you think the Obama supporters don't want those states to count?
Obama says that he has the judgment to be president because he was opposed to the war from the start and Hillary shouldn't be president because she voted for the resolution. At least she's in some good company with her vote: Kerry and Edwards are two of the many senators who voted for the resolution. According to Obama, they too don't have the judgment to be president.
I am glad Obama made it clear that he isn't interested in VP. His wife has also said that he won't run again for President.
Obama is a little too arrogant for my taste.

David   March 10th, 2008 8:43 pm ET

Will you, CNN, PLEASE, stop pandering to the Clintons' political machinations by continuing this talk of a dream ticket with Obama as VP. It is preposterous for the second place candidate to deign to accept the leading candidate at her VP choice. It only serves the Clintons' interests. Neither candidate will choose the other; the feelings are becoming much too tense and personal.

I agree with many of the comments here: the Clintons' are masterful politicians who, I fear, will succeed in bringing down the first real hope for inspiration change that we have seen for many, many years.

I am glad Hillary is a fighter. If she is nominated as the Democratic candidate that is ALL that she will be doing with the Republicans and conservatives. Hillary's use of the Republican playbook (fear mongering and negative advertising to tear down the opponent) only forshadows the future with Hillary and Bill.

Hillary's marginal, but evident, victories in Ohio and Texas are victories over inspiration and eloquence. How sad that she had to tear the beauty and value of inspired speaches.

There must be a better way. I certainly hope that far-sighted people continue to see that way, as I do, in the possibilty of Barak Obama.

Paula, Farmington New Hampshire   March 10th, 2008 8:43 pm ET

I am a woman of a certain age, a devout NON Republican. I just want to say that Hillary Clinton has so turned me off (and I had been an admirer earlier) that I am tempted to stay home in Nov if she "wins" the nomination. She is such a "bamboozleer" and outright lying politician (which I am so fed up with) that her mere voice or image on tv or radio makes me turn it off (as I do with Bush-–too painful) God forbid that this country falls under her self-serving sway for power. She is a baddie in disguise

Andy   March 10th, 2008 8:43 pm ET

Obama is an arrogant. He is not prepared for anything so vice-presidency would be a gift. Of course you can be a great vice-president without being ready to be president. He is given the chance to learn. The fact that 18-24 years old voted for him, says nothing about his ability to lead. Those kids would vote anybody who is giving a dance on the stage and is reciting some slogans. Obama cannot win the nomination, none of them can win it. There is a limit of how much arrogance is acceptable from this guy. At least half of the Democrats will not vote in November or will vote McCain.

linda hemmingsen   March 10th, 2008 8:43 pm ET

answer all the questions about resko obama how did you get the money for your house if he was bankrup as the media states?????????his wife didn't have money so with all the lawsuits after resko who gave you the money?

Tech Recruiter   March 10th, 2008 8:43 pm ET

Hillary is once again being hypocritical. If Obama is so inexperienced, why in the world would she want him as her VP?

p   March 10th, 2008 8:43 pm ET

I'm an independent moderate. I like Obama but am willing to consider McCain. If Hillary is anywhere on the Democratic ticket, that makes my vote easy. Obama/Edwards...now that's compelling. Here's a good way to put my feelings about the Clintons – I would vote for George W. before I vote for Hillary. Clear enough?

Pon Mao   March 10th, 2008 8:42 pm ET

Only a Clinton can make a loser appears to be a winner! The Clintons really know NO SHAME !

Beverly   March 10th, 2008 8:41 pm ET

Jack please visit youtube and ta ke a look at the video that Hillary Clinton does not want you to see

Summer   March 10th, 2008 8:41 pm ET

I would love to hear what a hard core Hillary fan thinks of this.

If she were my candidate and she just finished telling me how horrible Obama is and in the next breath said oh by the way lets join forces I would be irate.

-Anyone but Hillary 08

WY   March 10th, 2008 8:41 pm ET

Hey CNN,

Guess what? The caucuses (the 2nd half of the "two-step") make Texas a draw.

Anytime someone can blow a 20 point lead, yeah, it's a loss.

Hillary is seriously grasping at straws if she thinks Obama would ever consider the 2nd spot.

She will self-destruct and take the Democratic Party with her if she gets the nomination.

Diana   March 10th, 2008 8:41 pm ET

Obama will be the Democrat Nominee for sure. Hill can try all she want to; the people has spoken and they love Obama for their president.

I was watching Campbell Brown's show on Monday and was disgusted to see Campbell's bias-ness towards Obama. She interviewed two people and each time the questions were stared to criticize Obama and to put up Hillary.

Campbell, if you cannot control your bias attitude towards Obama; get off the show and do some background work. American wants to see fair and plain politics; not you hidden agenda.

linda hemmingsen   March 10th, 2008 8:40 pm ET

hillary has never thought she was intiled to be president the media started saying it and you foolish people believe everything they say. it is up to you who you vote for but mark my words obama will never be president all the independents and republicans who have sided with him did it for his nomination he has already shown he is weak when confronted on something he doesn't like he runs off the stage. the republicans say they have voted this way so he would win you reap what you sow another opportunity down the drain.

Jeff, Huntington Beach, CA   March 10th, 2008 8:40 pm ET

"NEVEROBAMA" says "GOD LOVES AMERICA AND HILLARY CLINTON!"

I have to wonder if some of you folks are for real.
Get real... Seriously.

A Bag of Chips   March 10th, 2008 8:40 pm ET

This reminds me of two people playing chess. One is clearly behind but they are offering a draw!!!

Texan   March 10th, 2008 8:39 pm ET

Obama leads in delegates, popular votes and he's taking some of Hillary's super delegates. Go figure. She better worry if he wants her as his VP. I wouldn't want a snake in the ground behind me.

Jon Stewart and SNL are looking for ratings. They will have them for awhile.

Creshia Foote   March 10th, 2008 8:39 pm ET

Why in the world would Barack Obama want to tie himself to the Clinton legacy? And if he is not competent enough to be president what changed?

Besides isn't the Clinton trial in California tied to felon Mr Paul due to start in October this year? Oh I forgot the MSM is not reporting on that!!

Also please tell Campbell Brown to chill out! I live in Michigan and we dont want any re do where Clinton backers are doing the funding.

Mike in NYC   March 10th, 2008 8:39 pm ET

Jude said:

<>

He has no shot at the red states in November.

So what if he won most red states by a double digit margin - those were Democrats, and the liberal wing of the party to boot.

Most voters in those states are Republicans, and they aren't voting Obama in the general election.

Then again, they won't be voting Clinton either, which is why McCain will win in the end. Not something I'm looking forward to, but that's the way it is, kids.

Grant   March 10th, 2008 8:38 pm ET

Just another diversion to fool voters, especially the ones lower down the social economic scale which the Clintons prey on....talk about desparate, in any other country, this candidate would be laughed out of the room, but in America, that type of comment is given merit...talk about ultimate power.....too bad for Obama, you can never win with the Clintons...

leslie   March 10th, 2008 8:38 pm ET

The wave of the future for the democratic party is a 50 state strategy. The old big state strategy has cost us 2 past elections. We need every state. Obama realizes that....any democratic candiate will carry NY, NJ, CA etc.... Hillary has no gold hold on these states if she lost her bid as the candiate for november....this is all pure spin from the clinton campaign. Secondly, I don't know why CNN keeps refering to this story about the VP....Obama is ahead by every measurement right now. He has run a good positive campaign.

Speak for yourself!!!!!   March 10th, 2008 8:38 pm ET

Obama does not represent 'the people of America who believe that the government is owned by the people'. He is a politician. Do you really think the people of Florida – who he is NOT supporting feel that they own the government? Duh! Please do not make such blanket statements, they reinforce how naive you are.

A new SurveyUSA poll has Hillary up by 37 over Sen. McCain among Latinos in Florida (67-30). The poll has Sen. Obama down by 7 to Sen. McCain among Latinos in the general election swing state (42-49).

This is really no claim – I can just say the I will NOT vote Blue is Senator Obama is the top of the ticket. Period. Not an opinion....just fact! I oppose nuclear weapons, Senator Obama is pro nuclear weapons, and I do not support devisive healthcare proposals, or someone who can do no better than to parrot what Senator Clinton has said and essentially copied 2 specific areas of her economic plans and ideas. Read the history and time frame of both. Or don't and be blind. Senator Obama is not a Democratic Team participant and that is a shame. He cannot take the White House alone!

A vote for Senator Obama = Senator McCain in the White House.

JimP   March 10th, 2008 8:38 pm ET

I don't care if God is VP; if Hillary is anywhere on the ticket then I'm voting Republican.

Timo   March 10th, 2008 8:38 pm ET

A joined ticket, HRC, you make me laugh again. What a desaster ... What about this one ?? Edwards is endorsing Obama, add his 26 Delegates and just seat Florida and Michigan as voted in January. In both states around 50/50 then and it doesn't cost any money at all ...
Doing then, what has the Clinton camapaign to say then ?? Vote again ?? Early vote invalid, another flip flop ??
No, seriously, I don't understand WHY so many superdelegates are still keeping their endorsements silent ??
EDWARDS, GORE, RICHARDSSON etc, a solution is up to you !!!!!!!
What are you waiting for ?? Are you scared you may endorse the wrong candidate ?? Are you scared about your own political career ??
Especially GORE, because he has nothing to loose ....
Timo, foreigner residing in Taiwan, quite amused, what is going on in your country. You faiuled with Kathrina and you even cannot organise an election ??
No problem to revote FL and MI, but where would a punishment will be ?? Don't even consider to halfe the delegates like the republicans did ?? Oh, nono, Clinton campaign would not tolerate this ...

Whuzi   March 10th, 2008 8:37 pm ET

Is it being mean if I say she has more "less educated" people voting for her. Thats what the polls say, so I'm just reading from that. If people are so uneducated that they fall into that slot, I don't see them being educated enough to understand something as complicated as politics. Maybe thats why these people are so easily fooled by the Clintons. Thats probably why they come on CNN blogs and TYPE IN ALL CAPS because they can't figure out how to turn off the CAPLOCKS.

E Popp   March 10th, 2008 8:37 pm ET

He's gonna be sorrryyy...when John Edwards joins Hillary for a ticket that can't be beat!

Ted   March 10th, 2008 8:37 pm ET

Hi Guys – love from Canada

Obama – you have won! Hillary is nothing without your backing. Look at the facts. You have at least 50% of the democratic people and likely more.
A good number of republicans will stay home as they will have a hard time supporting a man with an adult diaper on. You also have many republicans that will vote for you as they are basically tired of the same old and won’t vote for Hillary as they hate Bill. Many won’t vote at all!
If by chance you don’t win the democratic nomination, run as a third party candidate. Dispel the notion of the donkey or elephant symbols of the old regime and aspire for something new. Make the new symbol the American flag (no animals) Take the high road and do not stoop to the old politics. Focus on the people, their respect and their dignity and they will take you all the way.

No one expects you to solve all the problems but to give them a fighting chance so that they can once again respect and support their government and their nation.

As I said, mathematically you have already won with or without the democratic ticket.

Best wishes from a 50 plus, white Canadian citizen.

Bring back world respect to North America. Canadians are behind you!

tmike   March 10th, 2008 8:36 pm ET

WE don't need another bush in the White House.

Please Hillary ..........go away

bimmer   March 10th, 2008 8:36 pm ET

Obama is a loser, an impersonator, a plagiarist, a flip-flopper and the most liberal in the senate.

How long can he fool others?

Iggy, Maryland   March 10th, 2008 8:35 pm ET

Hillary and Bill Clinton are desperate right now. They're under-siege. You folks know what desperate people do...in this case, the Clinton strategy is to change the tone of manipulation tactics.

Folks, beaware of the Clintons, they are clear cut dangerous creatures from a different planet. The Clintons don't care about the welfare of the Democratic Party. They care about their dynastic control. They're determined to derail the Democratic Primary to their oon advantage. Listen to what the governor of New Jesersy and PA have to say on the evening News "We support the Clintons and we will make sure she wins the revote primaries in Florida and Michingan". Folks these governors from these two states are idiots and are the one destroying our Democratic Party Systems in America today. They sound like corrupt officials with no moral authoriy. How can they know that she is going to win the revotes? Have they been corrupted by the Clintons? I don't think they're worth being governors. They act like bunch of idiots. All the care is Hillary the Greedy Woman.

I truly believe that the Clintons and their THAGS who support them are in the high gear of stealing the nominee from OBAMA in order to advance the STUPID AND IDIOT CLINTONIAN DYNASTY.
People if you love Democracy, don't vote fro these thugs of Hillary. Cast your vote for OBAMA tomorrow and April 22. Can't you see that Hillary Clinton and her Husband Bill are liars. The have lied to you before and you want to believe them again. Don't vote for her.

Hillary and those governors in Penny State and New Jersy are CORRUPT STUPID IDIOT MANIPULATORS WHO WANT TO STEAL THE NOMINEE AND FRACTURE THE DEMOCRATIC PARY.

Brian   March 10th, 2008 8:35 pm ET

Clinton will not win look at the delegates 1,553 to 1,438 (is this counting the Texas Caucus?) The race is over Clinton CANNOT overcome this lead. She will need to dominate all remaining elections by like 65% (won't happen). Contest is over let Obama pick Richardson as VP and lets move on to defeat McSame!

Liz Foster   March 10th, 2008 8:35 pm ET

I would like to speak for myself, since certain political analyst feel that they speak on behalf of the "wishes" of most democrats... IDO NOT "WISH" to "HAVE BOTH" on the Democratic Ticket. I strongly support Sen. Obama, and have no confidence whatsoever in Sen. Clinton's ability to lead this country properly. I would not vote for Hillary Clinton in "any" position on the democratic ticket. Let me add that I support Sen. Obama. NOT BECAUSE HE IS AFRICAN AMERICAN, but rather because HE IS QUALIFIED, DEDICATED TO THE CAUSE, AND CAN GET THE JOB DONE WELL! By the way, I am PROUD that he happens to be African American.

Patricia in NH   March 10th, 2008 8:35 pm ET

Hillary's ploy to plant a seed in the minds of 'some' has backfired.... Hey Hill.... There may be an opening for Gov. of NY..... go for it... on second thought, I wouldn't wish that on the citizens of that great State... so Hillary, just go home.

Grif   March 10th, 2008 8:35 pm ET

My Dear Claire Mccaskille, I would run for cover, if I were you!

' Borack Obama? I don't know who you mean? I don';t know the guy..

Yes run for cover, because you will in the near future.....

Still that's just one, of my many: Predictions........ in 2009

changing times   March 10th, 2008 8:35 pm ET

Funny how Clinton supporters, blindly follow and even endorse Hillary's ridiculous campaign antics. You can't tell me this is really how they believe someone should behave. It's a disgrace and everybody knows it.

I respect Obama's stance to try to stay as positve as possible, but she is really pushing it. I admire his self-control and discipline.

Obama for President of the United States of America!

scbrown   March 10th, 2008 8:34 pm ET

Obama is running a mississippi ad about a comment that Hillary clinton made, which she later apologies.

What if Hillary ran a radio ad about the OBama " wasted soldier" comment that he later apologies for?

The media would have slam Hillary for doing this.

I believe Mississippi people will remember his comment as well.

Bewitched   March 10th, 2008 8:34 pm ET

You can check out both of the canidates and find out the whats what on these two canidates at Wikipedia.... This told me multitudes about the two and who has what experience.... I think you'll find it very enteresting...

Anna, Las Vegas   March 10th, 2008 8:34 pm ET

Hillary Clinton seems to want to make the case that "so many people" like BOTH Clinton and Obama to the point that they cannot make up their mind to vote for either one of them. I don't know who she's talking to, but quite opposite, it seems like a lot of voters only want their candidate. And let's face it. A lot of people that voted for Obama, republicans and independents alike, would never vote for Clinton.

This whole "dream ticket" thing is just pure political strategy for the Clinton camp. They are so good at the politicizing. It is kind of sad that Hillary Clinton can't talk about just the issues, but always needs to be on the attack in one way or the other.

Peter in Canada   March 10th, 2008 8:34 pm ET

Sorry to butt-in with my 2 cents...but politics is politics is politics.
This is a cheap political trap by Hillary. If he says that he would even consider her proposal it destroys his credibility as the "candidate of change" and would be seen by most as a defacto admission on the "experience" issue. It also misleads voters into believing that this is somehow a possibility, so a vote for her is really a vote for Obama as well.
A big part of "Change" involves changing out career politicians such as the Clintons...that's "Change you Can Believe In".
Any acceptance of a VP slot by him would virtually END his political career...so forget the dreaming folks!
If by some catastrophe he loses this thing, look for him to exit Washington politics ASAP!

Jeff - Michigan   March 10th, 2008 8:34 pm ET

It seems to me that Obama is simply saying. "I'm winning! that's what really matters. Political unity doesn't matter in one of the most important elections in history."

Clinton did not offer Obama the vice president spot, as the Obama campaign is spinning the issue. Hillary has simply left open the option of political unity. Obama has ruled out the idea of political unity during a very close race which has a very real possibility of splitting the Democratic party and allowing the republican candidate to take the general election.

Sometimes a compromise for political unity is more productive in the real world than a stubborn political ego.

JBL   March 10th, 2008 8:34 pm ET

Hillary, you can do sooooooooo much better than Obama! WHEN you win the nomination, a better choice for VP would be Edwards or Gore. Obama clearly doesn't know what he's doing. Not only is he not ready for the presidency, he's not ready for the vice-presidency either. A year in the US Senate does not a president make (or VP for that matter). I'm voting for Hillary either way, but I hope she is careful with her decision for running mate.

eye opener-open your eyes America-PA   March 10th, 2008 8:33 pm ET

Excuse the Clintons, they're ignorant, arrogant, cocky, deceptive. obnoxious-(throat gagging), cut throat, among everything else that you can think of that is contrary to any thing positive, but most of all desperately wicked. Like President Obama said, he's running for President of the United States, and He not playing politics as usual or that same-old, same olddddddddd.
He doesn't need her all like that, she needs him. The 27 states that Obama has won whether Primary/Cacauses, big/small, doesn't matter; that she discount so much. Believe me, if she were to win which she's not, she will need those states in the GE. What she fails to realize is that, that Obama has won half the states, which to my knowledge no canidate has ever done in history(correct me if i'm wrong-anybody). But my point is what i said, above. HE DOES NOT NEED HER, SHE KNOWS SHE NEEDS HIM AND DESPERATELY, WHETHER SHE WINS OR SHE ACCEPTS VP.

Shirley in California   March 10th, 2008 8:33 pm ET

The Clintons are just out there to say anything, do anything to get political advantages for themselves! I have no reason to believe the Clintons meant what they said. Just watch them twist and turn everything to benefit themselves only!

Dawn   March 10th, 2008 8:33 pm ET

It's exactly what the DEM party needs so we can move on and sail to victory in November.

Clinton should be at the top of the ticket for the following reasons:

1. She has broader support (whites, women, white men, latinos, elderly people).

2. She has more experience and that WILL matter both in terms of winning against McCain AND once she actually gets to the whitehouse.

3. According to SUSA polls she already has 271 electoral votes which neither McCain nor Obama have. She puts into play bigger states (electorally) that Obama shows losing to McCain: FL, Tennessee, Arkansas, New Jersey, PA and West Virgina.

4. To seal the nomination, Hillary should demand that caucuses don't count (since they disenfranchise so many voters), demand FL/MI be seated, and count only DEMOCRATS who voted in the primary (not Republicans or Independents).

Rick   March 10th, 2008 8:33 pm ET

Hillary is amazing, saying that Obama lacks experience. Correct me if I am wrong, but aren't they both 2 term Senators? Hillary talks about her time as first lady being experience, what a crock. Does that mean Laura Bush is qualified to run the country. First lady makes apperances and goes to dinner they have nothing to do with policy.

Rose   March 10th, 2008 8:32 pm ET

All, I can say is that her campaign has hit a new level of Audacity!!! She's not even ahead to make such a comment...If which I doubt she becomes the nominee I with others I spoke to we will vote for McCain

Rose,
Riverview, Fl

Slick Willy   March 10th, 2008 8:32 pm ET

This brings up so many memories from the 90's. A powerful male democrat in power sleeping around on the taxpayers dollar.

Why is so many women out there want to support Hillary and place Bill Clinton back in the White House after he lied to the American people and was impeached by the House?

David   March 10th, 2008 8:31 pm ET

So much for the whining that the media is pandering to Obama. Did the evening news tonight lead with Obama's win in Wyoming, that he is poised to win again, and win more delegates in Mississippi, and that over the weekend, in a special election, Senator Obama helped a first-time U.S. Congressional candidate win election in a heavily Republican Congressional district, and that Senator McCain campaigned for the Republican candidate who lost in that election?

Heavens no. Three more demonstrations of Obama's strength? The Clintons got the media diverted to focus on the VP issue.

Yvonne   March 10th, 2008 8:30 pm ET

I will not vote for any ticket that has Hillary Clinton on it. John McCain will get this Democrat's vote over Hillary Clinton (and Bill). We need someone in the White House who knows how to treat people in a respectful way. The Clintons have respect only for themselves and "temporarily" for those who may vote for them (and it is a 'them', not 'her).
Any intelligent world leader will see through Hillary's facade and see her for the selfish and power hungry individual she is. Bottom line is SHE IS NOT A GOOD PERSON. I would not choose her as a friend, nor will I vote for her on any ticket.

Barack Obama is a respectful and honorable person who will make a remarkable world leader and gain the respect of other world leaders through discussion and problem solving. He will also be ready to make difficult decisions taking into consideration others' points of view. He will get my vote as long as Hillary is not on the ticket with him. She is way too devisive and there are too many people who truly dislike her as a person.

Dre   March 10th, 2008 8:30 pm ET

I just want to know why is it that Hillary's "35 Years" of experience isn't being examined. I've heard various reports from officials as well as citizens of some of the foreign countries (like Ireland) in which she visited or as she put it "worked" as the First Lady that claim she had nothing at all to do with any treaties made or conflicts resolved. As a news organization it is your responsibility CNN to investigate and report such claims. You can do a side by side comparison piece if nothing else. I just think with the latest load of crap released Hillary has pulled up her skirt, bent over and showed her tail to the American people with the same arrogance Bush had when he won his second term.

Jack   March 10th, 2008 8:30 pm ET

more of the same from the clintons, and still some people can't see through it. i am a Obama Sspporter, but i will not vote for in the fall if she is anywhere on the ticket. besides she already has a v.p. I can't stomach voting republican, so i will sit this one out. Obama And Edwards '08.

Yes we can!!!!!

Jen, Gainesville   March 10th, 2008 8:25 pm ET

Another dirty trick of the Clintons. The Party and the country are better off without them.

Karen Lawrence   March 10th, 2008 8:25 pm ET

Everytime I see or hear anything about Hillary I lose faith in the democratic process. She makes me ashamed to be a woman and she is killing the progress for women after her. I am truly ready for this to be over. I know enough now to know that Hillary is not my choice.

Tonja   March 10th, 2008 8:25 pm ET

I thought Obama was all about uniting the party. Him taking the VP is no way a demeaning job. After some time as VP then he could at least say he has more experience than he has now. It seems it would be good for him.

When he was elected for office he called Hillary and asked for help. I think she would be good to learn from and he must have felt that way or else he would not have called her to begin with.

It seems she offered him an olive branch and he rejected it. Hillary was trying to unite the party. I have to give her credit for that.

Obama says he is in first place, and by his eyes he is. But if you take an electoral vote by the states each have won and count the numbers by each state, meaning the number each state is worth, then Hillary is winning. Don't you think the Democratic Party is going to really look into that.

Face it, the Democrate party wants to win the Presidents seat so they are going to look at which one will win with the biggest numbers and as that stands right now that would be Hillary. I think Obama made a huge mistake by saying no.

Plum   March 10th, 2008 8:25 pm ET

Clinton's dismissive tone has been a constant in her campaign and this implication that Obama should accept the VP position from her is no exception. She also said that she and McCain would bring a lifetime of experience to the job but Obama would bring a speech. The only people who are more qualified to be president are ex-presidents, so her argument that she is more experienced is full of holes. Obama brings his own experience and set of skills to the table that are no less valuable than hers.

This dismissive attitude signifies that if she were to be elected president, she would only listen to the "big" people. She argues that she should be the nominee because she's won the big states. This attitude is extremely disrespectful of the smaller states. Also, she got support for her campaign mostly from big donors and ignored the smaller donors (and yet some people voted for her because they thought she was more for campaign reform than Obama?).

I was extremely disturbed by her attacks on Obama in the runup to the Ohio and Texas primaries. The attacks were not only damaging to Obama but to the entire Democratic party and show that she is only interested in her candidacy at the expense of everyone else.

MARIETTA,GA   March 10th, 2008 8:24 pm ET

wayne.professor obama is a very smart man who graduate magna cum laude from harvard,do you think he is dumb.
not only is he the smartest candidate,he is teaching us that good really can triumph over evil.david did not have any experience when he went up against goliath,his own brother try to silence him,but he still went ahead and win the battle.how many experience did tiger had when he entered professional golf?experience is good but it is limited to you who has it ,insperation and motivation is for everone and that is why obama is winning.he is more credible , people are taugh to speak truth,but the older we get the more we tends to drift away from that,but to the younger folks it is fresh in their mind so obama will continue to win this vote.

Ron Malloy   March 10th, 2008 8:24 pm ET

Too bad. I thought Democrats might see their dream ticket. Of course we all know, even though we don't want it to happen, that an Obama nomination will lead to a "President McCain." OK, I know I know, so many would love to see that. However, the Democratsdo not. They will have a rude awakening if Obama is the nominee. Clinton/Obama might beat McCain; even that leaves room for doubt. Republicans keep outmaneuvering the Democrats. The Obama nomination may prove to be the greatest Rove accomplishment of all times.

Mike   March 10th, 2008 8:24 pm ET

Senator Clinton is far more qualified tthan Obama to run this country . Obamas camp states that he is running for President (and not Vice President). Obama is young enough that after considerable experience as VP he could/would run again. If his arrogance does not consider this, the opportunity for a Black candidate (or female for that matter) might not present itself for awhile. Senator Clinton has PROVEN that it is SHE who can win the BIG states!

Take the offer... Deal vs. No Deal? DEAL!

dcrep   March 10th, 2008 8:23 pm ET

Clinton's ploy is especially dishonest because her relentless attacks on Obama's qualifications greatly reduces her value as a VP pick whould he win (and will hurt him in the general in any event). She is deliberately undermining the viability of the "dream team" with him as Pres because she wants it only with her as Pres.

Ray   March 10th, 2008 8:22 pm ET

I personally will not vote for Obama as president even if Clinton is the VP. If Obama is the Nominee I will be voting Mccain and hoping he wins and trying to talk Hillary into rerunning in 2012. I really don't think at this point that Obama will get the nomination though. If people are smart and have watched the Hannity special I cant see how anyone could vote for him.

Subhash Durlabhji   March 10th, 2008 8:22 pm ET

I think the basic Clinton attitude is if I'm not going to be nominated, I'll make sure McCain wins so I can win in 2012, McCain will be too old to run again. She does not care about ANYTHING except being President, and it is NOT because she really thinks she's this country's savior. The presidency has sadly become a ticket to riches and fame, who cares about the country's fate? Do you see Bush even for a moment having any regrets about ANYTHING he has done? His oil industry buddies and his defense industry buddies will keep him and the next two generations of Bush well supplied with everything they could ever want. And he has already said he wants to have his term hurry up and end so he can make money writing books (ha!) and giving speeches. There are a handful of politicians who rise above this kind of thing, but Clinton certainly is not one of them. Some even run for president but don't ever get beyond first base. One has gotten to third and the vision of those millions slipping away has the Clintons seeing red.

Poor Obama. Well, maybe this is good practice for the general election against McCain.

curtis in WI   March 10th, 2008 8:22 pm ET

Does Sen Clinton benefit? – not at all. Se only looks disingenuous and desperate since she has made it plain in the past that she has no intention of naming him VP and he has stated repeatedly he has no intention to be her VP.

She just looks like she is trying to ride his coattails and just squeak past him to win the nomination. And it is so blatantly transparent it is doomed to fail.

Chris - Hemet. Ca.   March 10th, 2008 8:22 pm ET

From "Slick Willy" to "Slick Hilly" these people will do ANYTHING for the power of the presidency. If Obama is ahead in seated delegates at the end of this primary and the superdelegates choose Clinton as the nomination this old "boomer" will be sitting home in November. I refuse to vote, once again, for the lesser of two evils!

joe tex   March 10th, 2008 8:22 pm ET

Obama campaign should continue to let the American people that at the end of the day, Hillary is still part of george bush and same ole Washington politics.

Ticket of HOPE: OBAMA AL GORE   March 10th, 2008 8:21 pm ET

Typical Billary Clintons: Double Speak, Double Speak, POWER, POWER, POWER , NO MATTER WHAT IS THE PRICE AMERICANS ARE PAYING!!!

JOHNSON   March 10th, 2008 8:21 pm ET

i am a black man ,,,and i support hillary,,,when we had clintons,,country was doing good,yeah bill did some messing aroud ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,but thats not hillary fault.and hillary is good and she is very forgiving.

so me and my family will be voting for hillary

John Stevens   March 10th, 2008 8:21 pm ET

Great poiltics on Clinon's part. And the Obama people can not say it's negative.

If one lesson is to be learned during this primary season – it's that the 'system' is very undemocratic. In Wyoming – just 15% of the registered Democrats 'elected' 12 delegates whereas millions of people in MI and FL will elect 0. Just 10,000 people 'voted' in Wyoming – that 1 delegate for 800. Anmd that from a state that will NEVER vote Democrat .... and will via the Electoral College gives no votes to the Democratic Nominee !!!

All the states should have primaries – either physical one or mail-in – and only registered Democrats should select the Democratic nominee IMHO.

Anton Mitton   March 10th, 2008 8:20 pm ET

Why should Obama, the one that is winning in the delegate count and in the popular vote, consider the #2 slot? It doesn't make sense, unless you are a Clinton, and you know you have no chance in winning, barring a party coup. There's more than a little of a sense of entitlement from the Clinton camp.

To 'from Boston', "That may be where this headed, but of course we have to decide who's on top of the ticket," Clinton said Wednesday on CBS The Early Show. "I think people of Ohio very clearly said it should be me."

To 'Wayne', it's not arrogance when you are number #1.

aisha   March 10th, 2008 8:20 pm ET

HI SONIA…………

I AM REPUBLICAN.AND I AM SUPPORTING A WOMAN WHO WILL MAKE HISTORY AND OPEN DOOR OF OPPURTUNITIES FOR OUR DTRS..

I AM A WOMAN AND I AM PROUD OF HILLARY,,,,,SHE IS STRONG,NO WOMAN CAN EASILY FORGIVE A MAN FR CHEATING BUT SHE DID FOR HER DAUGHTER ….SO I LOVE HER FOR THAT

Theresa   March 10th, 2008 8:20 pm ET

ALL IS FAIR IN LOVE AND POLITICS!HILLARY IS LIKE WALKING ON EGG SHELLS?? SHE HAS BEEN REALLY GOOOOD AS FAR I BELIEVE!! LOOK AT THE PAST ELECTIONS WHERE IS THE MUD SLINGGINGS????

GUESS ILL GO TO ANOTHER SITE I CAN SEE MY COMMENTS ARE CENSORED . WRITTEN BY ONE OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE!!!
AGAIN THAT THEIR VOTE OR OPPINIONS WOULDNT COUNT ANNYWAY

Gloria Strong   March 10th, 2008 8:17 pm ET

What the Clinton campaign has doing for the last two months is politics at its worst: it's all spinning, spinning, spinning.

Let me ask all of you who are not decided yet: what do you think Hillary Clinton's presidency would be like? Do you think she'd be straightforward with the citizens of the United States or more similar to what we have now in the White House?

bill   March 10th, 2008 8:17 pm ET

This has all gotten out of hand. Just let the media caucas and let them tell us who wins. They dirty obama's face a bit for a day or two and its back to news as usual. Freedom of speech should mean FAIR and accurate. The news programs should read" Its time for Hillary bashing." Does it matter that we the people should elect a president on truth and percision not the truth as media mogals see it. I for one am sick of it!! Report the news not idiotic things like the child actor voting for obama. I here by challenge the media to report info which helps us vote responsibly. Sorry another deaf ear!!

Karen   March 10th, 2008 8:17 pm ET

That shows you how she lies to what suits her. Not long ago. He was not a worthy opponent. Now she wants him as VP. Should we trust her?

john davis   March 10th, 2008 8:17 pm ET

Hillary is getting more pathetic and desperate by the day. She's just trying to ride on Obama's wave. But she's in for a Wipeout. hee hee.

joe tex   March 10th, 2008 8:17 pm ET

I wish the Obama campaign would stick more to what got them this far, continue with his speeches that inspire the new generation. I too wish he would go negative, but he is too good of canidate to do that . Hilllary will do anything to win the nomination. She complained about Obama's tactics...What about her tactics...People?????

Gary   March 10th, 2008 8:16 pm ET

It suggest to me that she is a very smart and a master of the political system and would make a very strong leader who does not give up even under overwhelming odds.
"strong leader "
Yes she should be the one to answer that phone call.

David   March 10th, 2008 8:16 pm ET

Nice try Hill. The only thing which out weighs your tumerity is your ineptitude. Ready day 1? It's day 400+ since you started the campaign and your still not ready.

You're an embaressment to the women of the US. Shame on you for not being forthwright re: taxes. Shame on you for not being forthright regardeing the 1990,s White House papers, shame on your secrecy regarding your land deals. Shame on you for being a cad while your husband steps out on you, and it's appears you promote that... If this is what the women of the US want as they're role model and thinks this woman represents thier interests best... then frankly, they deserve you.

Kwame   March 10th, 2008 8:16 pm ET

Why is it that CNN frequently profiles Hillary Clinton or a representative without offering similar or equal courtesy to the Obama side..
There seem to be serious bias..

VALENTINE   March 10th, 2008 8:15 pm ET

I think hillary and bill are going nuts these days,how the hell would they ask BARAK OBAMA to be a vice presidential candidate when he is too far ahead of them these shows how desperate the clintons have become since they thought hillary could get the nomination on a silver platter......SHAME ON YOU HILARY AND BILL OBAMAILL BE OUR NEXT PRESIDENT COME RAIN COME SHINE

Simon   March 10th, 2008 8:15 pm ET

What's all this nonsense about being ready on day one? How many times have we heard that? It's really starting to get on my nerves! She keeps saying that she is ready on day one, and suggesting that Obama is not. Why is she offering him VP if she thinks he's not ready? You have got to be kidding me. Someone is talking before thinking and I think that someone is Hillary. And what's with the whole offering him the VP anyway. She's way behind! Who is she kidding. And what about the changing the rules in the middle of the game!? She is spinning out of control and I really do not hope that she will get anywhere near that presidency. The only thing she is ready for on day one is to screw something up.

nicholas   March 10th, 2008 8:15 pm ET

Hillary is like Stacy from the movie "Waynes World"...

"If you're not careful, You're gonna lose me!"

sha right.... you cant get more desperate than this. Give it up.

Ravi   March 10th, 2008 8:15 pm ET

It's pretty rich of the losing candidate to offer the winning candidate second place. Then again I suppose different rules apply to Clinton politics. What's about Hillary's tax and White House records? Are they going to be released anytime soon? Or could it be that she may not have actually saved the world in a fiscally responsible manner?

richard   March 10th, 2008 8:15 pm ET

Attention Attention Obmaniacs. If Hillary wins we are almost guaranteed 16 years of Democrat rule. If Obama wins we may only have 4 or 8 years. He is untested and unsure. His wife even declared that he will make mistakes. This is not a position where you can make mistakes. See BUSH

JoeySky18   March 10th, 2008 8:14 pm ET

The democrat party is now split in 50/50. No matter what Obama supporters want to believe, Hillary got 50% of the popular vote. The Democrat party need to unit and come up with the winning ticket for general election. And the unity ticket is the most clear way to achieve that.

Hillary has done her party to unit the party. She recognized that Obama also has 50% support from Democrat voter and deserves to be on the final ticket. Obama did not do his part.

Instead of touting and mocking Hillary offer, he could have said that "I truly hope that Sen. Clinton would also accept the VP ticket that I will offer". He apparently doesn't have the interest of the Democrat party in mind. He just reject one of the two possibilities to create the winning ticket for Democrat party. And if he did offer her the VP ticket later, I don't think she will take it. And i don't think her supporter will vote for Obama.

marla   March 10th, 2008 8:13 pm ET

Why woul Hillary wants Obama on her ticket?, it would be a training camp, and also no Obama/Hillary , she would do all the work and he would take all the credits like the last two debates.

A Bag of Chips   March 10th, 2008 8:13 pm ET

Okay people, THINK!!! Since Hilary "wants to unite the party" , why doesn't she offer to be Barack's Vice-President since she is currently behind?

Brenda in SC   March 10th, 2008 8:12 pm ET

Weather your red or blue – we are suppose to be Americans voting for the person we think is BEST for the OFFICE of the PRESIDENT of the US, Don't let CNN, MSNBC. FOX NEWs or anyone else decide your vote, listen to what they say, weigh the pros and cons and vote you feel is the best for the job. Stop with the pettiness, call each other liberal or whatever, stop talking about hairdos, pantsuits, and things that don't have anything to do with the job. We need someone to help the economy, get us out of the 12 Billion dollar a month war, create American jobs, freeze the interest rates, put controls on the gas prices and so on and so on. I grew up around DC and I know the press and the dropped messages by parties etc. Also know that the media has to consideration of who can afford ad space, who knows who, who is a friend of whom, etc. If you really want to take back control – vote for yourself, don't let the media or others decide your vote.

Jane   March 10th, 2008 8:12 pm ET

How are they going to unite a nation if they can't even get it together in their own party. What a joke. Whether Clinton or Obama wins, I am voting for McCain. Obama only has his silly substanceless speaches and the Clintons are known for being shady. Is this all the party has to offer us? Better luck next time. I'll take my chances with the Republicans.

t   March 10th, 2008 8:12 pm ET

everyone watch this video this talks about peter paul and the clintons. This is really who you want to be pesident?

Theresa   March 10th, 2008 8:10 pm ET

I SEE , THIS IS WHAT IM TALKING ABOUT !
CENSORSHIP?? AND WHATS UP WITH HIS HOUSE??
HAVENT HEARD MUCH ABOUT THAT .WAITING FOR HIS COMMENTS??LIKE HES WAITING ON CLINTONS TAX RETURNS??HA!HA!!

Leeza   March 10th, 2008 8:10 pm ET

Oh yeah she wishes.

Jose Card - Independent   March 10th, 2008 8:10 pm ET

Clinton's baggage will become Obama's if he picks Hillary as his V.P.
Obama is safer inviting Anybody But Hillary to join his ticket.

Losers have no say. I give Hillary credits for staying upbeat under such challenging times, but she is just as good a liar as Bill Clinton is.

John   March 10th, 2008 8:09 pm ET

Uh Oh, Hillary.....the truths are becoming more apparent.....time to either A) cry B) claim the media is against you C ) say all the big boys are picking on you, the girl E) push out your lower lip and pout.....one day, somewhere years from now you might just learn that lies, deceit and fabrications don't work, they come back to haunt you....you totally deserve it, gal

ORK   March 10th, 2008 8:09 pm ET

Could some please get this woman diagnosed for sycophantisms! Hurry!

Slick Willy   March 10th, 2008 8:08 pm ET

This brings up so many memories from the 90's. A powerful male democrat in power sleeping around on the taxpayers dollar.

Why is so many women out there want to support Hillary and place Bill Clinton back in the White House after he lied to the American people and was impeached by the House?

Will   March 10th, 2008 8:08 pm ET

I find it simply amazing that the Clintons could think the voters to be so, so stupid as to not see past her ploy!

Not only is it political "gamemanship", but underhanded and sly.

Nick in Las Vegas   March 10th, 2008 8:08 pm ET

Hillary is brilliant. She knows exactly what she's doing with this. That is why I voted for and continue to support her. I would love to have a smart President, one who truely understands "the system". This clearly makes Obama look like an ego-maniac. If he drops Clinton's support, then Clinton supporters will likely drop him, myself included.

**And for the idiots who claim Hillary is loosing, this is still a race too close to call, MI & FL have yet to be counted and pledged Democrats are not the only factor in how the democrats will choose their nominee, besides. GET REAL.

Hillary all the way!!!

Mel   March 10th, 2008 8:08 pm ET

Hillary is the most EXPERIENCED according to Emperors Club!!!!

grow up   March 10th, 2008 8:08 pm ET

I'm getting a little tired of Hillary supporters saying that barrack Obama isnt ready to be president. There has been only one non encumbent who was ready for the presidency on day 1. that was Cleveland because he had been president four years earlier. Sleeping in the white house and even advising the president dont make you ready to be president. having a former president at your side doesnt make you ready to be president. There is a learning curve, its a complicated job. So you get the smartest and most energetic people you can find and you listen to their advice and make the best decision you can. Obama is just as ready as clinton is.

Ron   March 10th, 2008 8:07 pm ET

The math is very simple. Obama is ahead in pledged delegates and the popular vote. He has won more states than Clinton. From what the Clintons are doing to win this election, it is not a hyperbole to call them monsters. What's most puzzling is that the DNC has been bending to the whims of the Clintons. I'm gonna make a prediction, and I hope I'm not wrong. The Clintons will STEAL the nomination, they will pick their vp and the majority of Americans will rather have John Mccain in the White House than the Clintons with their bag of scandals.
1.All candidates agreed that FL and MI were not gonna count. Clinton flouted the rule and now every one is trying to make amends to accomadate her because SHE MUST WIN.
2. Michigan which is traditionally a caucus state may now have a primary in the event of a do over, why? because Hilary Clinton does not like caucuses
3. HILARY CLINTON AND JOHN MCCAIN HAVE MET THE THRESHOLD FOR COMMANDER- IN -CHIEF. DEMOCRATS, IF YOU HAVE ANY EYES, THERE GOES YOUR DREAM TICKET.
MCCAIN/CLINTON 2008

Speak for yourself!   March 10th, 2008 8:06 pm ET

Obama does not represent 'the people of American who believe that the government is owned by the people' – most of us I would hope are smarter than that and know he is in it for himself. Period. He is a politician – wake up folks. Great lip service with little to show for performance. Oh – sorry – so the voters in Michigan and Florida think what of Senator Obama's failure to support their votes? Government owned by the people ??? LOL Please do not make blanket statements – they are insulting to the rest of us with a brain.

Not that the men will care much but women should go and just take a peak at the clinton site. They have an area which describes what her experiences have been overseas on behalf of women. She has cited some of it with her activities in Ireland but there is a tremendous amount of information there.

I will not be voting 'blue' if Senator Obama is at the top of the ticket. I do not believe nor support anyone who is in favor of nuclear weapons (Senator Obama is) , devisive establishment of healthcare, can't do current duties although the rest of the seasoned Senators seem to be, and is as inexperienced and green as they come. Pie in the sky = McCain in the White House!

La Raza   March 10th, 2008 8:06 pm ET

God Bless Cafferty. He is the only one who tells it like it is.

Chris, Middletown, CT   March 10th, 2008 8:06 pm ET

She benefits from weak minded supporters who believe her ever changing positions....I mean....does her healthcare plan support illegal aliens?? (you bet it does) – does she support drivers licenses for illegal aliens? (you bet she does) – will she say anything to get elected – i.e. saying her opponent is not qualified....then lets it leak that she would consider him for VP (wait...I thought he wasn't qualified....) – you bet.....Obama has been consistent....support him

Brian   March 10th, 2008 8:05 pm ET

A blatantly political move by a losing candidate in order to try and sway in indepedents and undecided democrats...With her recent attack ads and this sudden "endorsement" of Obama for VP she is really beginning to personify the "monster" she was characterized as by one of Obama's aides...very pathetic actions on her part and I hope that voters of the remaining primaries realize that...obama and edwards in '08!

Theresa   March 10th, 2008 8:05 pm ET

WHAT IS TAKING SO LONG !EVERYTHING IM SAYING IS ON TV STATIONS FILM??WHY NOT TALK ABOUT IT??

Neal C   March 10th, 2008 8:05 pm ET

I was at a party this weekend when the topic turned to politics, 9 people present. 7 had voted for Obama, 1 for Clinton, and one for McCain during the Texas primary. All said how discusting her latest ploy really is. "You have done so well boy, that I might jus let you be my VP".
Just remember, she will return to her true colors on Wednesday!

Jamie   March 10th, 2008 8:05 pm ET

Bill Clinton didn't have any more experience than Obama when he became president-so let's stop saying that he's not ready. This is Hillary playing low political games to get a vote, it would be career suicide for Obama to team up with the Clinton's-how many presidents do we need in the White House??

nilla   March 10th, 2008 8:05 pm ET

Can somebody tell Obama to grow up and stop that bickering.

Tom Swift   March 10th, 2008 8:05 pm ET

`
I am an independant that generally votes for Republicans for president.

I might vote for Obama this time around.

I will never, ever, ever vote for a ticket with Hillary on it.

Period.

bud   March 10th, 2008 8:05 pm ET

If Clinton somehow steals the nomination through back room dealing with super delegates, which is her only hope at this point, she will absolutely NEED Obama on the ticket. No Obama, no presidency cause the Obama's supporters will flee in droves and want no part of this slimy campaign. The Dem can kiss the presidency goodbye for another 4 years.

David   March 10th, 2008 8:04 pm ET

Given her comment last week, Hillary thinks John McCain is ready to be Commander-in-Chief. Hillary should offer the VP job to him. They could announce it on SNL.

Hillary's problem is she was given a turn-key campaign for NY Senator and really has no idea how to build a campaign organization, unlike Senator Obama who learned the hard way.

At this point in her campaign, when it comes to discussing VP, she needs to adopt one of Bill's sterling accomplishments as her slogan: Don't Ask, Don't Tell.

The Great Divide   March 10th, 2008 8:04 pm ET

It could be debated, but there are many that would be in agreement that Ted Kennedy was not cast in the same mold as Robert. That being stated he did enjoy tremendous support within the Democratic Party. In fact Ted Kennedy held sufficient support to almost guarantee he’d be the nominee of a united Democratic Party, had he made a timely run. As Barack Obama rightly points out, it’s all about fundamental decisions. Ted Kennedy unwisely decided to stake claim to the nomination against the Democratic President seeking a second term. Regardless of the outcome, Ted Kennedy’s decision held no option for the President, Jimmy Carter or Ted Kennedy to move forward with a united Democratic Party. Fast forward to 2007, Hillary Clinton does not run in 2004 but instead she makes a decision to run for the nomination and presidency in 2008. Barack Obama made a very captivating speech at the convention for Kerry. Now examine the options with regard to the maintenance of Democratic Unity the ultimate goal of the party and all its members.

Clinton decides not to run and Obama throws his name in the hat. The Obama campaign and candidacy would be more defined by the public and media from the perspective of where is HILLARY. The status of the candidate would be cast in the vein of a Kerry and the Republicans would take every advantage. Now, Obama is far more skilled then Kerry, he may win the general election, but the starting point and the preferred position for the Democratic Party is not one where the Republicans are armed with the question of where is your most high profile candidate. Second option Clinton and Obama both run and after a rigorous and divisive campaign, Obama wins and the party is divided moving into the all important election. Third option, Clinton wins and the party is divided moving forward. Fourth option, Obama fades quickly and the party is united behind Clinton. Fifth option Obama decides, that although he has strong support there is no probable scenario where the Democratic Party will be united. He does not run and the party is united behind Clinton.

If there is another probable option I don’t know what it would be. The most likely outcome of both candidates running is the one we see unfolding at present. In making this fundamental decision the test or standard to be applied is not based on the final outcome. Party politics is ultimately about uniting behind a strong candidate. Obama may win the nomination and go on to win the Presidency but the fundamental decision can not be applauded in light of the divisive outcome that was reasonable and probable with regard to unity and party fortunes.

There was a political consensus held even by the Obama camp that Clinton would face certain and overwhelming pressures to seek the nomination. In examining this decision you have to step out of the box as it’s not about liking Clinton or Obama. I’m not stating that he won’t win or that he had no right to seek the nomination. I am stating that with regard to fundamental decisions and getting it right from day one, Obama in the vein of TED KENNEDY many years before, got it wrong. The lack or failure to understand the important aspects of unity or the willingness to make judgments from a utilitarian perspective have place America and the world at risk. This decision should never have been about Clinton or Obama but the existing political realities upon which he was expected to grasp and act.

Jenna   March 10th, 2008 8:03 pm ET

Too all in Despair:

Unite your party and stop acting like a bunch of hate mongers, do you think that your personalities will change if Obama is elected? I dont think so...

Jenna

Anonymous   March 10th, 2008 8:03 pm ET

Hillary is so desperate. Obama is winning. He's not stupid. Why stop his lead?

Chanda   March 10th, 2008 8:03 pm ET

I have always thought from the get go that a combine ticket would be whats best for the party and they would make an unstopable team!!!! I do not think he has enough experiance and that as VP he would get that experiance he needs to be president later not now and we would have 2 great presidents for 16 years!!!!!! Its what this country needs I wish they would set their differences aside and realize this is whats best for the country.

Jonny   March 10th, 2008 8:02 pm ET

Asking Obama to be her Veep is the ultimate insult and illustrates how this woman will stop at nothing to gain power.

Theresa   March 10th, 2008 8:02 pm ET

SHE HAD SAID SHE HAD NEVER FELT COMPELLED BEFORE TO BACK A CANDIDATE?? WHAT IS UP WITH THAT STATEMENT?/
BUT SHE WOULD GO DOOR TO DOOR IF SHE HAD TO??NOW

AND BARRACKS WIFE HAD NEVER BEEN PROUD OF AMERICA IN HER ADULT LIFE UNTIL NOW !!! PEOPLE WAKE UP HERE!!

Brenda in SC   March 10th, 2008 8:01 pm ET

I think Obama out to say I would consider VP position because he is not going to make President. The newest press release about his terrorist ties, along with his ties to Rev. Wright who speaks non so Christian-like toward white or Jewish Americans as well as his wifes continued disrespectful remarks about America, he better wake up and consider the offer while it is be considered. You see the name Connie Rice being thrown out there now to off-set the African American vote. The press is the one who started this and the Clinton just answered in a polite way. Me ,myself and I don't Obama has the qualifications to be President yet and certainly to win an election against John McCain who does have experience. I am not a John McCain voter but I do respect him. I don't have respect for a couple because you do have to include Michelle Obama in this as you will represent the White House as well that have ties to Resko, the Weatherman, the Trinity Church including Rev. Wright and LF. Michelle Obama doesn't respect Americans or her country. VOTE HILLARY – the best PERSON for the job.

Audrey (PA)   March 10th, 2008 8:01 pm ET

For those people who are dreaming … red states will go blue and blue states will also be blue when Obama is the nominee. I don't think so. Here is why…

1) Nearly 70% of senior citizens are voting for Hillary because of her maturity and her fine record of service in the senate and Washington. If Hillary is not the nominee, they are likely to go for McCain as he also has accomplished much in his life. Hence, blue state may not be always blue.

2) Most Republicans are conservative and Obama was named the most liberal senator last year. Hence, these republicans will never vote for Obama and hence, red states will never go blue when Obama is the nominee.

3) Some people are just voting for republicans because of lower income tax rate under Republican president. However, income tax will increase drastically if Obama is the president. For instance, Obama is going to give driver license to millions of illegal immigrants.

4) According to the polls, McCain is more favorable than Obama in economic issues and hence, this time of economic recession condition, people may just not go with Obama.

5) So far Obama is attracting Independence but they are always changing their mind on different issues. It is just too risky to count on Independents. Also, there are polls that show McCain is attracting Independents.

6) Hillary is attracting more of the democratic based, such as blue-color workers in most of the states and they may get disappoint at the results and won't just vote if Hillary is not the nominee or not in the joint ticket. If Obama can't gain ground on his owned party voters, can he expect that other party members will vote for him? It is too risky to take.

Texas voter   March 10th, 2008 8:00 pm ET

why a lot of peoples think OBAMA..BLA.BLA going to get very small ,small changes to win nominee...even him "I'm running for president of the United States of America" HEY stop walking on the sky young boy....you going to fall down......heheheh..

Dems2008   March 10th, 2008 7:59 pm ET

Dear America the Beautiful,
ou are just as delusional as Hillary! WHat scandal? He has not been linked to anything, but your beloved Hillary has many, many scandals under her doo brown pant suits!!

Get a grip! Vote Obama and stop this madness!!

Larry Hoover   March 10th, 2008 7:59 pm ET

was Hillary with Bill when he answered the phone when the CIA said they had Ben Laden in their sites and wanted permission to shoot?
Is this the experience she is talking about?

Stev   March 10th, 2008 7:59 pm ET

Let's look at the facts: Hillary is ahead with th epopular vote and the super delegates. She has the most experience, Obama is a first term Junior senator who ranks 99th in the senate as far as senority, it is a joke to think he has the knoledge and experience to be President, Hillary will eb ready on day one and she can get us out of the mess Bush has created. In recent poll eHillary has also been proven to be the one that can beat Mccain NOT Obama. Obama just wants to be President but Hillary wants to make America a better place and she has the ability to do it. If Obama obtains the dem nomination we will see the greates Voter remorse ever for this country. Please America don't be brainwashed by this man who's "star Power" will soon fade away and people will be wondering what on earth they were thinking when they supported him!!!

Emilie   March 10th, 2008 7:57 pm ET

This is obviously a desperate move on the part of Clinton. How can she, being in second place, even suggest such a thing? As for the media, they seem to be going along with these spin tactics. If you shove the idea that you've already won down peoples throats, maybe it will really happen? Is she delusional? What is even scarier, is that some people are jumping on the band wagon! HELLO! Obama has the majority.

maya   March 10th, 2008 7:56 pm ET

And what's with Obama using the word "hoodwink"? Talk about injecting race into the issue (isn't that Malcolm X?) and talk about negative!

Jenna   March 10th, 2008 7:56 pm ET

With all due respect, Junior Senator Obama is not able to see that even though he won the states he has, they are not states that will pull in the election and win the Republican party.

If he is unable to see this equasion, how will he ever run a country...
If he is VP he can learn and maybe be more electable next time.

Jenna

shane   March 10th, 2008 7:56 pm ET

this chick is crazy

franklahai   March 10th, 2008 7:56 pm ET

It looks like most people post on a blog "without reading" at least 2-3 previous blogs. This is based on my reading of over 15+ comments here: Given that numbers do not lie;
Here are the numbers:

Pledged Delegates: Hillary = 1,200; Obama = 1,347 (+147 for Obama)
SperDel: Hillary = 238 (down from 250; Obama = 206 (up from 50)

(Note Obama is waiting for Texas Caucaus; he is ahead in large numbers: 2,3918 (vs. Hillary = 18,620; deficit of "5,298)

Totals: Obama = 1,553; Hillary = 1438
Deficit for Hillary = 115

With all the BIG states Hillary has WON, how would she overcome these deficits? She would be lucky to come in 3rd place!

Theresa   March 10th, 2008 7:55 pm ET

OPPS WILL YOU NOT POST MY COMMENT OR HAS SHE BOUGHT U TOO! (OPRAH)

Belle   March 10th, 2008 7:55 pm ET

Could all of you Hillary Haters take a step back JUST FOR ONE MOMENT?

Just for one moment...Hillary Clinton loves this country. She does what she says she is going to do. She took on National Healthcare when NO ONE had the guts to. She has consistently felt NAFTA should be reviewed and ALL contracts in WTO be looked at and renegotiated. She has the support of 27 flag officers. She has been vindicated by CNN's own article trying to degrade her about experience. She practices things like learning how to forgive. You can spin it all you want, but she stands on her record, and only asks that you personally research it. I have...I used to hate Hillary Clinton...well...I was wrong!

I judged her based on her husband's actions. Figured she had to know what was going on...and should have left him...but guess what? What if you don't believe in divorce? Talk about commitment...what if you do believe in commitment? Doesn't REAL commitment mean no matter what? How many of us have that kind of commitment?

Most folks just leave with I loved you the best I could...yadayada...but really they are saying they NEVER were committed in the first place.

So here is Clinton...she is AHEAD in the popular vote; (Unlike Obama Democrats, I believe ALL Democrats' vote should be counted, and NOT disenfranchised by some party leader who should NEVER have that kind of power in the first place) She has won 298 Electoral votes vs. Obama's 190 in his RED states.

But she believes in the Democratic Party. She knows neither will have the votes to win. You can say all you want Obama is ahead...but sealing the deal is having ENOUGH to win. Neither do. The Party is divided. Clinton offers the Olive Branch and Obama ridicules her for it.

I think Clinton is showing more leadership than Obama ever could.

Mike in NYC   March 10th, 2008 7:55 pm ET

I'm no fan of Clinton, but VP is all Obama can hope for.

Spin it all you want, Obamaniacs, but he doesn't have, and never will have, the demographic breadth needed to win the general election.

Blacks, liberal whites, and independents/republicans who would never vote for a white candidate with a record as liberal as his - this is all he has.

He'll have a lead in delegates (who knows, maybe even a lead in the popular vote) going into the convention. Then the collision of fantasy with truth will occur, and we'll have fireworks galore! I envision a truckload of illusions being destroyed in the process.

Sherrie in CA   March 10th, 2008 7:55 pm ET

Here's my recommendation:

Go to each candidate's website and read their proposed policies and plans. Read them well. Then, when some new little blurb comes over the Internet or on TV, whether it's about NAFTA, or Obama's religious beliefs, or about Clinton's experience...DO SOME RESEARCH!!

Before clamoring to these forums, ready to accuse someone of this or that, make sure what you're stating is TRUTH. There's so much garbage out there that it's actually become pretty comical to read these boards.

I've chosen my candidate based on their platform, their history, and how they've run their campaign. I refuse to fall prey to ridiculous innuendo, short-sighted remarks, or insulting tactics. I would hope that all of us are just looking to elect someone who can move us past this current administration and on to something better - while still maintaining our integrity.

That's just my recommendation...

Mark from San Diego   March 10th, 2008 7:55 pm ET

Obama doesnt' need the Clinton baggage and all that comes with it. It will completely undermine his message of change if he accepts a VP positon from her or adds her to his ticket. The Dems need to dump her as quickly as possible.

dem08   March 10th, 2008 7:55 pm ET

HILLARY= winner, first women president, awesome, great, beautiful, intelligent, fighter, caring,determination, will, strength, experience, strong etc. FOR THESE GREAT REASONS AND OF COURSE A LOT MORE, I WILL VOTE FOR HILLARY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

THANK YOU HILLARY FOR FIGHTING FOR OUR VOTES HERE IN FLORIDA. WE FLORIDIANS ARE READY TO VOTE FOR YOU THE SECOND TIME.

AS FOR YOU OBAMA, DON'T EVEN BOTHER TO ASK FOR OUR VOTE , SHOULD YOU WIN THE GENERAL ELECTION, WE WILL REMEMBER HOW YOU ARE TRYING TO DISENFRANCHISE OUR PRIMARY VOTE. SHAME ON YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Denny Sangiovanni   March 10th, 2008 7:55 pm ET

I don't know why people think it's Clinton idea. Every body was thinking that way about them, even the news did speculation about it long time ago. Also they keep saying that African american don't vote for Obama cause he is black, but Obama's pundits keep saying that Missisipi is coming and Obama will win cause there are a lot of African American in Missisipi (??). Why are we so naive?

Dems2008   March 10th, 2008 7:54 pm ET

There is NO end to her madness. Senator Obama came out of no where and has really blown up!! The country is so tired of partisan politics and lobbyist controlled politics. Please go away...quietly!! She cannot catch Senator Obama and if she were winning we would not hear any of this crap. She would be blasting a totally different tribe. She has done some good, but she has mostly done bad. Scandal after scandal, lawsuits, misrepresentation and screaming into mic after mic. Can she tone it down a little. We hear you, we just don't like what we are hearing!!

B 'n T   March 10th, 2008 7:54 pm ET

You know, the media takes something, re-works it to suit them, and then plasters it all over the place and people buy it as gospel.

Folks, here's what Clinton said (not only is it printed here but I've seen the video):
"I've had people say, 'Well I wish I could vote for both of you,'" she said. "Well, that might be possible some day. But first I need your vote on Tuesday."

NO where does she say anything about a Clinton/Obama ticket. NO where does she even suggest a joint ticket in any shape, form, or fashion. This is all pure news media hype. So don't pick on Clinton & don't pick on Obama... go to the source of this tripe and rip the MEDIA for trying to "create" news instead of "report" the news.

Patricia   March 10th, 2008 7:54 pm ET

I am outraged by this blatant political gamesmanship by the Clintons. It's just her way of positioning herself as the front-runner (which she is NOT). Shame On You Hillary Clinton.

karen   March 10th, 2008 7:54 pm ET

Oh yeah, I forgot. Hillary needs to go home and get ready for her gig as a Material Witness in the Paul v. Clinton case. Check it out and make yourselves familiar with it, because its going to be a media circus if she gets the Democratic nod. Karl Rove will have a ball with it and the Dems will shoot themselves in the foot with an unelectable candidate. Why would Obama want to run with someone like her? Guess what? He wouldn't!!!

ds   March 10th, 2008 7:54 pm ET

The Clintons sound like they are asking Obama to move to the back of the bus.

Vig   March 10th, 2008 7:54 pm ET

Obama wants to be top dog. He wants a free elevator ride to the top. What has he done to deserve the Presidency? Absolutely nothing. He was bored in the senate and impatient with the process of dealing with legislation. Seems to me he's one of those people who wants something for nothing. Hillary should treat him like an irritant.

Nelson   March 10th, 2008 7:54 pm ET

Hillary should take some time to make a serious attempt at working on her marriage.

JOHN   March 10th, 2008 7:54 pm ET

AND NOW WE FIND OUT THAT VIARAGOZA CLINTONS CO CHAIR AND MAJOR OF L.A. RECIEVED OVER $7000 IN CONTRIBUTIONS FROM REZKO. WHAT? THIS IS SO LOW OF HILLARY TO SUGGEST OBAMA TAKE THE V.P. SPOT.... THROW THE COON A BONE AND HE'LL TAKE IT. THIS LADY IS GONE. I'LL NEVER VOTE FOR HER.

Ed   March 10th, 2008 7:53 pm ET

It concerns me that Hillary Clinton and her husband have not come to the realization that she cannot win the nomination. This newest suggestion that Obama act as Vice-President is ridiculous. She is behind and statistically cannot catch up. If these delusions of hers continue I would suggest that she get some medication and leave the reality of policy making to those that can actually see things clearly. Hillary Clinton represents all that is wrong with the Democratic party. One need only watch that nasty mean Hillary Clinton supporter, James Carville, offer to put up money for new elections in Michigan and Florida to understand that they are not the what we need. This nasty political maneuvering is typical of that hateful political style that started under Bill Clinton and continued under George Bush. It is time for a change! Go Barack Obama!!

jimmy vekmen   March 10th, 2008 7:53 pm ET

Obama on lobbyists.! Does Senator Obama who has received endoresements from some Unions think that these Unions ecpect nothing in return for their endorsements?

LOBBYING IN WASHINGTON, D.C. HAS BEEN AND WILL CONTINUE TO BE PART OF THE POLITICAL SCENE NO MATTER WHO GETS ELECTED PRESIDENT.

Bebble   March 10th, 2008 7:52 pm ET

Hillary can do better than choosing Obama. A CLINTON/EDWARDS ticket is what she should do. Remember Clinton won the big states and this race is far from over.

The media staged this....they asked the question over and over.

Obama is too full of himself. He's a spoiled child who wants the top prize or nothing. He will do damage in any position that gives him power.

CLINTON/EDWARDS
'08

Theresa   March 10th, 2008 7:52 pm ET

Obama BROUGHT TO YOU AND PAID FOR BY THE ONE AND ONLY
OPRA !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!i lIKE HER SHOW BUT SHE SHOULD NOT BUY THE NEXT PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE HERSELF???????????
HAS SHE BOUGHT HIS COVERAGE?? HAS SHE BOUGHT THE SILENCE?? OHHHH NO ONE CAN SAY ANYTHING ABOUT HIM!!

WHAT IS UP WITH THIS ?? ITS AS IF SOMEONE OWES HIM SOMETHING??

Jen   March 10th, 2008 7:52 pm ET

I WOULD VOTE FOR A MONKEY FOR PRESIDENT BEFORE I WOULD VOTE FOR HILLARY. SHE THINKS AMERICA IS STUPID AND ONLY APPEALS TO THE WEAKEST OF HUMAN BEINGS. GO BARACK OBAMA!!!

Anonymous   March 10th, 2008 7:52 pm ET

Clinton says Obama isn't experienced to be Commander-In-Chief, but he's good enough to be VP. That only proves that she's willing to use Obama to get elected. She's an egomaniac. I am so sick and tired of her political games. People need to wake up and smell what she is slinging. If you want to set this country back another ten years, vote for Clinton. She's the same old thing. She isn't about change. She'll say and do anything to get elected. You cannot trust The Clintons. That has been proven in the past, and if you vote for her, you'll get burned again.

Christine   March 10th, 2008 7:51 pm ET

Is this a return to Jim Crow laws?

Hilary is in second place but asks a Black man who has raised more money, has more delegates and is leading in the popular vote to take step aside and be her back-up?

Democracy spelled with a large or small "d" still means majority rules. Except within the Clinton campaign. If she wins the nomination with superdelegates I'll vote for McCain.

I'm from Missouri which Hilary thought "counted" until last minute votes swung us to Obama at which point the Clinton's decided we didn't count any more. (see the trend?)

Mark   March 10th, 2008 7:51 pm ET

In every single poll I've seen for months, Obama does far better matched up against McCain than Hillary Clinton does. Why in the world would democrats who want to win in November, attach themselves to a lesser candidate.
Hillary Clinton is a liability and it's absurd and laughable that someone who is losing would start making statements like this. The Clinton's aren't smart, they are desperate and although they are manipulative enough to fool people, this is so blatant that everyone but her most staunch supporters will reject it. They are irresponsible with their power...

Casey, Atlanta   March 10th, 2008 7:51 pm ET

The Ultimate Check Mate:

If I were Obama, I would offer Clinton the Vice President ticket right now! In the wide open, at a podium, "a one time, right now, now-or-never" deal- take it or leave it!

What would this do: 1) it would swing the momentum immeidately back in his favor as the one who is bargaining from the position of power- instant credibility 2) it would eliminate any talk of his needing to consider her once her wins the nomination 3) he could say this is the style of "no pre conditions " he is referrring to- which would eliminate any suggestions that he would be negotiating from a position of weakness- when he says he would meet with all world leaders and 4) effectively end the nomination race by either showing Clinton as the human General Electric- Power (hungry) company, or end the nomination race by having her accept, consildating power and moving forward to beat John McCain.

The Ultimate Check Mate! (Disclosure: I am a Clinton supporter, this is just what I would do if I where Obama)

Rex, Houghton, MI   March 10th, 2008 7:51 pm ET

Whatever the politics may be, Clinton looks desperate. I am sad that the Clintons going out this way—they truly look pathetic as they grasp for anything that is floating.

karen   March 10th, 2008 7:51 pm ET

come june there will be a lot of people left with their mouth hanging open, let me school you younguns every move by the Clintons is a well thought out strategic move, these are two highly intelligent people you will all be eating crow in the next few months, you obama supprorters are so gullible it's like taking milk from a baby, you won't even see it coming, by the way I have never seen such a nastier more hateful group of people and you claim to be the followers of a uniter.

Teresa   March 10th, 2008 7:50 pm ET

In today's New York Daily News, columnist Michael Goodwin writes: "It's a dream team all right, as in dream on. It's a fantasy because, in the Clintons' pitch, naturally, she is on top of the ticket and Obama is her No. 2. That's rich of her, considering that Obama leads in both the delegate race and the popular vote. Forget those pesky voters – Hillary has declared herself the winner!"

Goodwin calls it a sign of desperation on Clinton's part and compares her to a con artist trying to sell a house she doesn't own. He says the joint ticket offer looks like an olive branch, when it's really a knife aimed at cutting Obama down to size.

Jane   March 10th, 2008 7:50 pm ET

I am loving the division in the Democratic party. Ah behold the great uniters!! How are they going to unite a nation if they can't even get it together in their own party. What a joke.

Percy F. Lage, Oklahoma   March 10th, 2008 7:50 pm ET

"Maybe the first thing he wanna change is to give FL to Mexico and MI to Canada after selling out Ohio."===============

Why would Obama want to reward FL and MI? If you put it to a vote, both states would go in a heartbeat! But I'm not sure Mexico would want a state that wasn't smart enough to know "how" to vote. And Canada would probably require MI to clean up the rust and pollution first. As for Ohio, nobody's buying.

LIZ ALCORN   March 10th, 2008 7:50 pm ET

THE CLINTONS HAVE BEEN DOING ALL SORTS OF TRICKS IN ORDER TO WIN. THEY DO NOT CARE ABOUT ANYTHING ELSE BUT BEING THE FIRST AT ANY COST. OBAMA, ON THE OTHER HAND, IS HONEST AND DO NOT GO DOWN THAT LEVEL. AS PEOPLE WHO VOTES FOR SEN. H. CLINTON, ARE SAID TO BE THE 'NOT SO SMART ONES', SHE PROBABLY IS HOPING THEY DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT SHE IS DOING.

Willard   March 10th, 2008 7:49 pm ET

Who wrote this story? is CNN now the official spokesperson for Barack Obama? Why? he can't defend himself from a woman? How is he gonna defend himself from Ahmadenajad? It's obvious that you are supporting Obama, everybody can tell. This is a democracy and I would like to remind you that while you might be getting hyped by your superstar, there are people here in America who are voting for Hillary and that their vote must count as well regardless of how you guys feel about her. Have you no shame CNN? Since when did you decide to join FOX News? Is that it then? If you can't beat them join them? Shame on you for going that low!

citizen3591   March 10th, 2008 7:49 pm ET

Hillary Clinton is vile. Catty. Artificial. Illogical.

And by saying that Barack's ready to be VP, which is the same as ready to be president, she is also showing the hypocrisy of her "kitchen sink" attacks.

Hillary stinks.

FTS   March 10th, 2008 7:49 pm ET

why obama said he won more popular vote? most of his win are from caucus which invovles much much less people than primary. it appears to me that in number, there are more people vote for hilary than obama.

btw, caucus is not democratic at tall, it bias people who do not have time, or needs to look after the kids, or do not have a reliable transportation. why not get rid of caucus for next election.

Shana   March 10th, 2008 7:49 pm ET

Could someone please tell me about Hillary Clinton's experience? I researched this and couldn't find that she has any experience that is superior to that of her opponent. Thank you!

Shana
Chicago, IL

Jane   March 10th, 2008 7:49 pm ET

I am loving the division in the Democratic party. Ah behold the great uniters!! How are they going to unite a nation if they can't even get it together in their own party.

PCS / North Carolina   March 10th, 2008 7:48 pm ET

Wayne wrote March 10th, 2008 6:24 pm ET

"I begin to see why so many Hillary supporters are saying they would vote for McCain rather than see this arrogant baby in control of the country."

You can tell the difference between Obama and Hilary supporters in these blogs. Obama suppoerters are sincere and talk to the point. Where as, Hillary supporters talk trash, and make acrimonious personal attacks.

Some of these are sarcastic and derogatory, and some are pure racism: "fairy tale", "Slum lord", "king Obama", "Hot air" "Obama supporters are sheep / pathetic " Obama Zombies….pathetic, "Rock star", "Obama supporters are cult members / sheep ", “king obama”, “Obama go back to Kenya” "Do you know why it is called White House" "Arrogant baby" are only a few of those.

THIS SHOWS HOW MUCH HATEFUL WE ARE AS A NATION.Towards another person of different color, religion, or nationality, but maybe even of the same ethnicity.

It's a shame to see people get so ugly and make such desperate attacks against each other when in disagreement, but then again, this is the politics that we have had since the 1980's, so many people don't know any better. Shame on anyone who personally attacks a person or a candidate, simply because they want "their" side to win. I mean, sure, anonymity on the Internet brings out courage in many. However, is that really courage? What does all this say about America? Come on folks! Wake up! World is watching us, they may think this is South Africa in the 1980's.

mamady sylla (london)   March 10th, 2008 7:48 pm ET

My estime to Hillary has vanished when she said her and mc cain are ready to govern not Obama and only 1 speech( in 2002) is Obama's record. I can' t believe Hillary went that far! Going for your rival against your partner?
So how can these 2 work together?
My understanding is that hillary will destroy the democraty party if she is the nominee.

Tanya   March 10th, 2008 7:48 pm ET

Clinton seems to be grasping at straws and will likely do just about anything (no wait, she will do anything) to win this nomination. Next up, there will be more talk from the Clinton campaign about going after pledged delegates. She mentioned in a speech yesterday that pledged delegates don't always have to remain "pledged" to the same person – they can switch to apparently! Is this the kind of person we want running our country??

GO HILLARY 08 Agatha Kerry, Yorba Linda, CA   March 10th, 2008 7:48 pm ET

Listen Up
Obama's speak in Canton, MS praised all the 'big wigs' first....the ones giving him money and voting for him....in the audience.

He talked in general terms of how he was going to save the people in Mississippi from being poor, etc...:that's why he moved to Chicago???" I wonder what the Mississippians thought about that comment. It made so sense to the poor people in Mississippi.

Obama's celestial speeches are not reaching the people who want real answers. The poor people already pray for someone to help them, not someone to pray for them.

greg   March 10th, 2008 7:47 pm ET

I have learned a lot about Hillary in these past two weeks, because when times are tough a politician shows his/her true character.

Hillary will say or do anything to get elected, including using the Republican strategy (from Karl Rove) of destroying the credentials of your opponent rather than building yourself up. Her recent behavior is exactly what I am sick of – divisive, smear politics. It is especially revulsive to see her use these tactics against a fellow Democrat.

If you like the way politics has become divisive and ugly, then vote for Hillary. She clearly represents "more of the same".

I have switched my support to Obama, who has shown himself to be a quality person whose behavior I respect. With Obama we have at least the hope of change.

Chris   March 10th, 2008 7:47 pm ET

The dumbing down of America. Orwell continues to roll over in his grave!

Chicagoway   March 10th, 2008 7:47 pm ET

For the good of the democratic party, there should never be this so called dream ticket. Because of the incessant bickering between the two candidates, the dream ticket actually will help the republicans in the general election. I can just see McCain bringing up qoute after quote from the candidates attacking each other and using that against them. All the republicans can do in this election is attack the democratic candidates. They cannot successfully debate the issues so why give them something they can use. STOP the dream ticket talk.

Also, I am starting to get Hillary confused with a republican with the way she attacks like a rabid dog.

scott   March 10th, 2008 7:46 pm ET

She can do better. its a joke how he claims he cant do his ral job because hes campaining I hope Missipppi remembers ttuesday he didn't have the time to go to the state of black america conv. in New Oreleans. this year because he was busy, Hillary showed up and gave a war plan speech at here real job also that same week makes you think who really is working for the people and a change?

Vikki, Tennessee   March 10th, 2008 7:46 pm ET

Hillary Clinton for PRESIDENT!

I'm for Clinton/Edwards – If I had to I'd vote for Clinton/Obama but that guy just really irks me.

doublepromo   March 10th, 2008 7:45 pm ET

VM today at March 10th, 2008 6:15 pm ET wrote:

"She is just pulling trick after trick out of that old tired bag of hers."

=================================================

The weathered Jack Palance-looking saddlebag one she wears on her head? Oh, wait a minute, that is her face! Shrillary looks like the Trix wabbit.

KS   March 10th, 2008 7:45 pm ET

from Boston : "I don't recall Hillary ever saying that she would be in the first position with Barack being the VP. For all the comments out there, unless it came directly from the candidate explicitly saying this, then everything you and the pundits say is just your opinion. Stop twisting things around. I believe Bill and Hillary just echoed what people out there said that it would be a dream ticket."

Hello, she said that the people of Ohio have voted that they wanted her on top.

John Q   March 10th, 2008 7:44 pm ET

This whole thing is like the scene in Empire Strikes Back – Hillary is Vader and Obama is Luke....

Hillary – "Join me! With our combined strength, we can end this destructive conflict and bring order to the galaxy!"

Obama – "I'll never join you!"

Jean   March 10th, 2008 7:44 pm ET

If this is such a novel idea, why doesn't Hilly go for VP with Obama as President.

Geoff, NH   March 10th, 2008 7:44 pm ET

Neither will ever run as the other's VP.
For the sake of argument, lets disregard the delegate counts here. Suppose Clinton was to get the nomination, and offer Obama VP. He would be a fool to accept, because he would alienate every voter who has respected him as the new future of America by allying himself with one of the embodiments of all that is wrong with our government, a political dynasty. He would not be able to garner the support neccesary in 4 years (people seem to forget, noone ever said it was an 8 year job..,, Carter,,, Bush Sr) to win. On the other had, were Obama to get the nomination, Clinton would never accept VP because shes too proud. So, why anyone has speculated about this possibility, i don't know.

Phil Newton Murphy, Oregon   March 10th, 2008 7:43 pm ET

#2 Clinton offering #2 to #1 Obama? Obama should give that #2 all the attention it deserves: None.

Only in Clintonville do we witness the mysterious alchemy of turning #2 into political gold. But it's still just a lot of #2 in my book.

Mike - Sammmanish, WA   March 10th, 2008 7:43 pm ET

These Clintons just get slicker and slicker, don't they. Take a hint – GO AWAY!!

The Obama   March 10th, 2008 7:43 pm ET

And what is the crap from the Clinton Camp thatsays "Obama could be ready by summer?" Ready for what?? He is already leading in votes, states, and delegates.

Clintons and their acolytes are just delusional.

T Mitchell   March 10th, 2008 7:43 pm ET

Hillary is still playing dirty tricks, this is just the latest. She is trying to create a false illusion that there will be a combined ticket for those people that don't want to see things get ultra-ugly. Her goal is to steal the votes of those that like Obama and will vote for him, but they also aren't happy with the barrage of attacks Hillary is launching that is tearing the party apart. She thinks that she can scare people into buying into the fear she is peddling and hold the DNC hostage while doing it.

Hillary has now resorted to terrorist tactics and manipulations for her own personal benefit.

Alberto   March 10th, 2008 7:43 pm ET

Obama wins in the "red" states and those with large minorities. Anyway, red states will go republican in the general election thus not much menning in Obama's mostly caucuses victories..

nk   March 10th, 2008 7:42 pm ET

This devious trickery the Clintons are using to try to make the public see a Clinton/Obama ticket will only confirm to everyone of her improper ways of winning. Is this how she would run her White House? With trickery and misleading the public? Come on! Obama has won twice as many states as her. He has more pledges delegates. Hillary read the facts... you are losing the nomination and you are using any desperate attempt to trick the voters! People learn who a person really is under pressure, Hillary is under pressure to win the nomination and she is showing her true personality...someone unable to stick to the truth and win by any means necessary, even if it involves unethical ways

Grif   March 10th, 2008 7:42 pm ET

I think you mean.... 92 and, a half, comments...

eva   March 10th, 2008 7:42 pm ET

Dear Senator Obama, just try to win the Presidency in November without Senator Clinton supporters!!!. You will be surprised!!!

Just the Facts   March 10th, 2008 7:42 pm ET

SHe is according to the CNN report "fueling the idea"...I say she can put all the gas she wants in this car but it isn't going anywhere!

Barbara   March 10th, 2008 7:41 pm ET

It isn't really about the VP position....it's part of her underhandedness in the way that she and her husband campaign.
First you tear him down, then praise, then hit him again....and hopefully in the process the Democratic voters are smart enough to realize that she doesn't care about the Party, she only cares about herself, as usual.

She is doing the dirty work for the RNC and has no conscience about the effect it will have. I once considered voting for her, but thankfully I came to my senses and voted Barack Obama. He has much more than she will ever have....INTEGRITY.

Soon there will be a lawsuit against her and her husband by a former contributor....will the MSM cover it, or will they continue to cover only the news that is favorable to Clinton?

Cheer   March 10th, 2008 7:41 pm ET

To the moderator, I am wondering what takes so long for you to moderate. I hope that you are not trying to suppress my voice.

MARYLOU JONES   March 10th, 2008 7:41 pm ET

HILLARY WOULD BENEFIT ONLY IN THE FACT THAT THE TICKET WOULD BE A SURE WINNER AND A REPUBLICAN DEFEAT. THAT'S IT! THEN SHE WOULD BE STUCK WITH A WHINNY, SNIVELING, ARROGANT VICE-PRESIDENT WITH VERY LITTLE EXPERIENCE IN ANYTHING. SHADES OF DAN QUAYLE... OBAMA PREACHES HE IS NOT ONE OF THE WASHINGTON ESTABLISHMENT AND IN ONE ASPECT THAT IS TRUE. HE SHOULD BE IN WASHINGTON DOING HIS JOB ON THE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE!!! HIS WHOLE PERSONA IS A LIE AND IT IS BEGINNING TO CRACK. WHY IS HIS PICTURE ON THE FRONT PAGES OF GLOBE AND ENQUIRER? THE OLE BONES ARE RATTLING AROUND IN THE "CLOSET"!!

David   March 10th, 2008 7:41 pm ET

Thats not change!!! Sounds more like recycled policy to me. The Democratic party must chose between the two Obama or Clinton. It may look like a "Dream ticket" but dream have a way of becoming nightmares and nightmares have a way of becoming Reality! I'm a new democratic voter with no experience, but I'm smart enough too know all you so called "Experienced Voters" have been screwing this thing up for the past 18 yrs. Obama 08 for change and hold the Hillary!!! If Sen. Clinton is attached to the ticket, I won't even vote for him......NO Clinton 08 is my call.....

avm   March 10th, 2008 7:41 pm ET

"The only ticket Hillary needs is a ticket back to New York. Hey Big Apple, take her back, please–she's not ready for prime time." I AGREE–BUT SHE IS NOT FROM NEW YORK. SHE IS FROM SOMEWHERE ELSE–FROM ARKANSAS? BUT SHE HASN'T BEEN THERE IN YEARS. DOES SHE KNOW WHERE SHE IS FROM?

SHANE IN CHICAGO   March 10th, 2008 7:41 pm ET

HIILLARY . . . . . WOULD YOU LIKE SOME EGGS AND TOAST WITH YOUR "WAFFLE"?.

Kate   March 10th, 2008 7:41 pm ET

Obama is simply more electable.

Obama has a 50 state strategy and can compete in the red states. He will put them in play with his broad appeal.

Hillary is loathed by republicans and not muhc liked by independent voters either. Even Democrats are getting tired of her.

She can only win in deep blue states, that any Democrat could win easily.

John Kerry had an 18 state strategy but lost. Hillary has a doomed 14 state strategy - she has only won 14, and has lost everywhere else in a landslide! McCain is popular with independents, Obama is the only choice for the DNC.

Hillary is simply a loser. She is unlikable. Frankly,. we're all starting to hate the Clintons because of their sleazy cheating tactics.

Michael   March 10th, 2008 7:41 pm ET

I thought she already auditioned for VP slot with McCain. Will her Husband take the slot if McCain doesnt? Republican are doing better even without campaigning. That speaks Volume. Wish they cant concetrate on issues. If she is in the solution bussiness then please offer those solution if not you have already endorsed McCain and his health care plan something you said was very dear to you. For her to qualify she must first proove she can manage and run her campaign. I dont think campaign should be about attacking your opponents instead you should present your plans and what you will do when elected. Leave the Media to dig dirts of your opponents and if they cant find any let them be judged by merits and character. My vote goes to the candidate surrounded by people of sound mind. What Hillary is doing is send a message to young girls that if your husband cant control his libido, its okey to stick with him as long as you can get elected or benefit in some sort. Bad example to set especially if your base is mainly women

earl illingsworth   March 10th, 2008 7:40 pm ET

Put simply, answer's, "No"! Hillary will fight to the finish,and I don't blame her,because Florida and Michigan are in her win column ,past and present. She has decisively won seven of the eight largest states, having lost only Obama's Illinois(Home State). The Republicans are voting for Obama in a big way (numbers),since John McCain has become the default candidate,(Romney's Concession,forget about when the preacher withdrew?) for they believe Obama to be vunernable. The great Senator Hillary Clinton from "New York State", has offered up more than a Olive Branch, and there seems to be no takers,and a great opportunity loss for Senator Obama. Remember this , Hillary was literally torn to pieces and shredded by the Republican Party over Bill's," Infidelity, and White Water" and stood tall! BRAVO !!!

Paul   March 10th, 2008 7:40 pm ET

The Clintons want to send Obama to the back of the bus, but we won't let him. Obama is winning in pledged delegates, he's won twice as many states, and he's going to be our next president. Yes we can!

Cheer   March 10th, 2008 7:40 pm ET

The Clinon's call for the front runner to be a VP simply reveals the twisted mind of Clintons.

PMC   March 10th, 2008 7:40 pm ET

Obama says he will not take the #2 position of VP.
Well, that is Strike 1 for Obama!
Strike 2 is that he will not win the Democrat nomination.
Strike 3 is that Hillary Clinton will actually win the Presidency.

See ya, Obama

Illinois 2   March 10th, 2008 7:39 pm ET

Hillary sure does not need Obama for a Vice President besides, he is to much for himself to accept a second place on the ticket. Hillary should go back on him for not being in a position to have a voice or vote on his claim of the RIGHT DECISION ON THE IRAQ WAR.
When Obama ran for the senate he had very little opposition in this race, so to say that he is something special is just not true.

Melanie   March 10th, 2008 7:39 pm ET

Hillary is a despicable lying scumbag who has nothing better to do than lie to the faces of her own supporters! Frankly I find her worse than her husband (and I don't think highly of Bill).

Honestly, Mrs Clinton build a bridge and get over it! You will never be in the white house!

And I am sure if Michelle Obama ran for President, she would beat her husband and Clinton together...

Phil   March 10th, 2008 7:39 pm ET

Re: Hillary's 3am in the morning ad....The Sequel:

Same ad~EXCEPT at the end: the voice over: Its 3 in the morning: Do you know where you husband is?

Well, its experience (perhaps even an experience from her WH days) but just how relevant is it.

BO can renounce and denounce, but its still funnny

this is Ridiculous   March 10th, 2008 7:38 pm ET

I'm no Obama fan, but it is ridiculous for Clinton to talk about him being her running mate. Get over yourself Clinton!! Whether you are a democrat or a republican you must admit that the Clintons are shady.

CLINTON OBAMA 08   March 10th, 2008 7:37 pm ET

CLINTON OBAMA 08

this is an unbeatable ticket. I am getting goosebumps and thrills just thinking of this.
lets make history democrats. lets get the best of both wolrds
the 1st woman president
the first african amrican VP 08 and president 16

this is from a true democrat

Audrey   March 10th, 2008 7:37 pm ET

For those people who are dreaming ... red states will go blue and blue states will also be blue when Obama is the norminee. I don't think so. Here is why...

1) Nearly 70% of senior citizens are voting for Hillary because of her maturity and her fine record of service in the senate and washington. If Hillary is not the norminee, they are likely go for McCain as he also has accomplished much in his life.

2) Most Republicans are conservative and Obama was named the most liberal senator last year. Hence, these republicans will never vote for Obama and hence, red states will never go blue when Obama is the norminee.

Kiki   March 10th, 2008 7:37 pm ET

Obama is ahead in delegates for the democratic convention. Hillary is far ahesd in delegates for the presidential election...Something like 260 for hillary and 199 for Obama. These are the really important numbers.

BL-NYC   March 10th, 2008 7:37 pm ET

Quite honestly, this could be Senator Obamas chance to actually get some experience!
He is not ready to Govern our Nation, not even remotely ready!!!
He did mention that "this is the kind of doublespeak, double-talk that Washington is very good at." That funny... He does that EVERY SPEACH!
And... Why does he keep putting down our Nation, our Government, he has no pride at all when it comes to our country... Seriously!!!

Greg   March 10th, 2008 7:37 pm ET

Given that she has to either: 1) attempt to convince the Superdelegates to overturn the will of the people due to the fact that Obama has an insurmountable lead in pledged delegates (which anyone with a pulse realizes that this would end any serious chances for the Democrats to win a general election in November); OR 2) attempt to use her political machine to force Florida and Michigan into spending a ton of money to re-stage the primaries even though they clearly broke the rules (wonder if they would be pushing this hard for a re-vote if they didn't come out ahead in the unchallenged voting), I would say that she is in absolutely no position to suggest that Obama should be her VP candidate.

At this point, it is looking like the Democratic nomination is his to lose and it goes without saying that he would not offer the VP post to her. She would be nothing but a drag on the ticket and, even worse for the Democrats, she would help mobilize Republuican voters who want to see her political life extinguished.

genbeg   March 10th, 2008 7:36 pm ET

First she pretended to cry (well sob) on national television. Then she appeared on SNL and Jon Stewart. Now she's offering Obama a VP nomination after talking and running negative ads about his lack of experience? What a mess.

Hillary is extremely desperate and this is definitely a testament to her shady Washington bureaucracy. Talk about a hypocrite.

Grif   March 10th, 2008 7:36 pm ET

Why comment!!! When they are ignored.. not worth the INK!

Lisa Salt Lake City, Utah   March 10th, 2008 7:36 pm ET

Are you sure that she doesn't want a McCain/Clinton ticket? She has been so complimentary of McCain's attributes while tearing apart Obama's.

Sean   March 10th, 2008 7:36 pm ET

Hilary you say that Obama does not have enough experence to be President, yet he has enough experence to be the V.P. Where do you come up with this junk. The only reason you want Obama on the ticket with you, is because you know that you can't win without him. Also you are not even in the lead when it comes to the delegates so why are you deciding who is the V.P is. Don't you think you are getting a little ahead of yourself. The person who is leading should be picking a V.P and you are not in the lead. Obama will win in November and will become the next President. Without you Hilary!

Obama Edwards 08

CZ   March 10th, 2008 7:36 pm ET

As an Obama supporter, I actually admire how cunning this move it on the Clintons' part. It's by far the most coniving thing they've done, way more so than the 3am ad or the SC race-baiting. This is nearly a move to set up a checkmate as far as publicity is concerned:

- By saying this, you're essentially criticizing your opponent, yet doing so under the guise of "unity"
- By doing this, you put the pressure on Obama: you can take away his "uniter" label (I'm actually willing to bet money she'll do this in the next debate) becuase a) you came up with the idea, and b) when he rejects it, you come out smelling like roses.
- If he were stupid enough to even admit that he would entertain the idea, it's a wrap. Many of the people who support him either couldn't stand Clinton before all this, can't stand her after her "win at all cost tactics", or can't stand her because most of her supporters are insufferable. He'd lose support by the truckload.
- You also get some of your more fanatic supporters to buy into it, since they're fine with Obama being a token but not being the man in charge. So you have them put pressure on the aforementioned Obama supporters.
- You make people forget the fact that you've basically run your entire campaign on this silly notion that you're more "experienced" because you were married to the president before.

Touche indeed.

Lance   March 10th, 2008 7:36 pm ET

The only way Obama will ever get my vote is if he is running as Hillary's VP. If he gets the nomination I'll be voting republican for the first time in my life. Obama is a pompous jerk.

Tehran   March 10th, 2008 7:36 pm ET

Maybe Clinton dont understand how the government works. Offering Obama VP means if anythings happens to her then he would be President. If she had the interest of the country at heart, why would you want so one so inexperienced to be in that position either. This dirty political games are getting tiresome with the Clintons.

BobC   March 10th, 2008 7:35 pm ET

"maya March 10th, 2008 6:23 pm ET

All polls show that the Dems are evenly split between the 2 candidates. And about 62% of Dems state that a "Dream Ticket" would be a good idea. Seems that she is just speaking to-and recognizing-the general feeling. Like the idea or not, don't start bashing her about an idea that fits the polls!!!"

The real problem isn't the democrats. The key is the independents. If 62% of democrats think it's a good idea, then are 38% that don't, plus all the Republicans and Independents that want nothing to do with Hillary. Sounds like a formula for losing, to me.

Brenda Waters   March 10th, 2008 7:35 pm ET

Again, Senator Rodham shows her total arrogance:

1) HE IS LEADING, DEAR! hadn't you noticed?

2) Your berate him at every turn for his lack of experience, judgement, etc., and then offer him your Second-in-Command??????????
Surely, a contridiction, and BAD JUDGEMENT.

3) With your staff-turnover and reputation as ' rather stressful to work FOR (NEVER WITH – I' am Clinton) – you will find it hard to get anyone to sigh up with you – the White House staff will flee in terror (before you fire them as was your wont when the Clinton First Lady arrived).

4) Always the 'Clinton', when are you going to stand alone?

5) DREAM TICKET – CLINTON & VP former Pres CLINTON – it was always what you really wanted since Hillary Rodham got lucky way back in College and hooked a dreamticket to the White House, once, but twice, mmm – bad judgement in thinking a rookie would be a push-over. We wil see how 'ugly it will get out there' when Senator Rodham Clinton lets her present highly-restraigned guard down, and the REAL HILLARY COMES OUT!!!!!!!!!!!

Brenda Elizabeth Waters-Cowley

xavier   March 10th, 2008 7:35 pm ET

To Solutions –

If you think Clinton is trying to unite the party then you must be one of the uneducated voters that she attracts.

Mary   March 10th, 2008 7:35 pm ET

To the blogger above........the events going on in Puerto Rico (PR) is not fair.

1) PR recently changed their election from a caucus (which would favor Obama) to a primary (which favors Hillary). Is this fair b/c they know which process favors which candidate and the leaders there are long time Clinton supporters.

2) PR has 55 delegates, which is more than official states such as Kentucky, Mississippi, Wyoming and the all-mightly New Hampshire. Is this fair?

3) PR is a "winner take all" primary. Is this fair when the rest of the country is divided proportionally?

All of these favors the Hillary campiagn and I think real investigative work needs to be done to look into who helped make these rules.

T. Campbell   March 10th, 2008 7:35 pm ET

Read in between the lines. By saying that Hillary wanted to put it out there she would offer Obama the VP spot. Fishing to see whether he would do the same, because she's thinking about throwing in the towel. Depending on how PA looks for her

Randy Porter Mo.   March 10th, 2008 7:34 pm ET

I don`t think she will gain anything from it. Hillary should keep sticking it to him and keep him on yhe ropes.Her constant offensive moves is what gave her the three victories last week. Obama is a cry baby with thin skin and seems to choke when being attacked, so I don`t know why she would even be so kind as to make the offer. Obama is just going to make her look silly by snubbing the idea of being number two. He sure has no intention of asking Hillary to be his VP. Hillary can`t win anyway, because if it comes down to super delegates, they will go with Obama. They will give in to the fear of racial riot or claims of discrimination, instead of voting the way their heart tells them two. The whole super delegate system should be outlawed. What gives these people the right to cast two votes, when it is illegal for you and I to do the same.

Kelly   March 10th, 2008 7:34 pm ET

Obama has FOUR MORE YEARS of elected office.
Hillary is a nice wife, but being a wife is not a job.
Hillary has 8 years in elected office.
Obama 12 in US and Illinois Senate

Bill Clinton was a governor with no FP experience and only 12 years in office
He beat the far more experience Bush Sr.

anne in wisconsin   March 10th, 2008 7:34 pm ET

Why do you Obama supporters continue to act like Obama is that far ahead and that Hillary is just a spoiler? It's not over yet and it's likely going to be *very* dangerously close–one large set of supporters–Obama's or Hillary's–may feel disenfranchised if this is not done carefully! Obama will need Hill supporters to win the General–Hill will need Obama supporters–Neither of these candidates is in a sure fire position! There will have to be a compromise of some sort that must take difficult issues into account–there is no "fair and obvious solution". What if he has the popular vote and say, 100 or so more pledged delegates yet he's failed to win any major swing state that Democrats need to win? Get real, do you think Wyoming is going to vote Democrat? Obama over McCain? No. We need the big states AND some of the small states–someway or somehow these two have got to work together OR we should just get Al Gore to run.

GO HILLARY 08 Agatha Kerry, Yorba Linda, CA   March 10th, 2008 7:33 pm ET

Obama would feel emasculated if Senator Clinton had to help him out. His male ego can not handle a woman VP. That's why we need a woman President. Hillary Clinton is smarter and more experienced and doesn't worry about being emasculated.

4Hillary   March 10th, 2008 7:33 pm ET

Why is BO so afraid of Hillary?? Are you hoodwinking again BO??

J. Cavins   March 10th, 2008 7:33 pm ET

Obama should announce he would like Bill as his VP.

BGIV in NC   March 10th, 2008 7:33 pm ET

ARROGANCE ARROGANCE ARROGANCE!!

I wish someone from the press would really take some time to point out emphatically that BARACK HAS MORE DELEGATES, HILLARY IS IN SECOND PLACE!

Hillary would make a fine VP, even president of cranium in sphincter.

Unbelievable!!!

Jan   March 10th, 2008 7:33 pm ET

It scares me to think that the same group of people who have run up huge college debts, maxed out their credit cards, thought they were really getting a deal when they bought a home with zero down and a sub-prime rate, think that Obama is the pied piper who will magically make everyone in Washington change and he will do it overnight. Or maybe they think that if you don't have a plan and connections it will all go away! Do you really think that at 12:01 pm January 20, 2009, that all the ladies and gentlemen of the Congress will just lay down and roll over for Obama? Hello! Wake up America. This country is in a recession. But of course GWB isn't going to tell you and many of you just don't want to believe it unless he says it. Wake Up! Hillary and her connections and cohorts are the only ones who will be able to deal with the horrendous mess that GWB ;has created.

Joy   March 10th, 2008 7:33 pm ET

to America the Beautiful-are you kidding? No way Obama can compete with the Clinton's on scandal and sleaze–please educate yourself on this subject.

Allison Marie   March 10th, 2008 7:33 pm ET

With the media giving Obama a free ride it's one way of fighting back!

I'd rather her select someone else.

Uncounted in Florida

Mary   March 10th, 2008 7:32 pm ET

Wolf is Pro-Clinton.....watch out.

Leebo   March 10th, 2008 7:32 pm ET

Don't do it, Barack!! She needs you, but you sure don't need her!! (In fact, I'd lose all respect for you if you pick her. Seriously. She can't even run her own campaign.)

And, one more thing – OBAMA WON TEXAS!!

Truthspeaker   March 10th, 2008 7:32 pm ET

Hillary and Bill have always preyed on the poor and blacks to get votes. Now that they have turned from her, her psychology is kicking in. She is twisted in her thinking. She is a loser and is preying on the poor and blacks to twist their minds that they can have both if they just vote for her. The USA would be better off without the Clintons in Washington. You're a sucker if you vote for her!

talmis   March 10th, 2008 7:32 pm ET

I hope that the ARROGANT attitude of Obama costs him the election!

it is sad to see how he proclaims himself as the "uniter" and then dismisses any possibility of collaboration with Hillary Clinton. This is a toddler's behavior, is it going to behave like that if he gets elected?, is that his style of negotiation?...
Hillary was opening a hand no matter what...and he is so arrogant that does not know how to answer properly to an offer like that, OK we get that you are running for president, but, what if you do not win?, are you going to move to the republican party?, start your own party?....childish!!!!, immature!!!

IN ADDITION....
Just a reminder...FLORIDA IS ONE OF THE BIGGEST STATES AND EVEN IF THE DEMOCRATS DISMISS THEM TO ELECT THEIR CANDIDATE...THEY WILL PLAY A BIG ROLE IN THE GENERAL ELECTION!!!....
FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN SHOULD BE COUNTED!!!..., then we will see if Obama stays in such an arrogant and anti-uniter position

The Obama   March 10th, 2008 7:32 pm ET

Clinton is desperate, grasping at any straw she can find. She is going down for the third time. Do not believe any of the trash that her campaign is spewing. If she is nominated, she will NOT pick Obama.

And Obama is the candidate of change, he does not need her.

So don't believe her lies. Vote out the old establishment, the time to take out the trash is long overdue. Just say No to Clinton and her lies.

Richard Rodriguez Rivera   March 10th, 2008 7:31 pm ET

Media, open that closet to see how many skeletons come out. will it be like the the TV series the monster family full of ogers.

james, newport, KY   March 10th, 2008 7:31 pm ET

Clinton is getting very desperate.

Nobody likes you Hillary, go home. (wherever that may be!!!)

New York expat in Santo Domingo   March 10th, 2008 7:31 pm ET

And, she's pandering for votes from her own loyalist superdelegates who she was counting on to hand the election over. She needs to give them justification to take her over Obama. The risk, which is short-sighted and tremendous, is what this does to the actual party and public members: they will reject her, those who supported her, and the party until she's no longer a part of it. This cannot be brokered in a back room, it'll need to see the light of day – the public demands it given recent Bush/Gore history. In that case, she's cooked, too. Party leadership needs to step in NOW to stop these shinanigans that derail the process and issues of real import to win the General Election

sick of hill's insanity   March 10th, 2008 7:30 pm ET

Hillary is doing this to "trick" voters into voting for her! If he's so inexperienced, why would she want him? She's doing it to get those voters who are leaning towards Obama (but AREN'T leaning toward her) but haven't made a full committment to him.

Billary's scandal-riden end in the White House just makes me sick. If she was willing to bow down and let Bill get away with making her look like a fool in their marriage, what will she do for the US?

Voting for her will make a country already looking like fools (with our tap-dancing... C student... coke-head president... caught up in a stupid war that he can't end – scratch... WON'T end...) look like bigger fools.

Regarding the post by "from Boston"... obviously she means he'd be the VP.... she said, "But first I need your vote on Tuesday." It doesn't say OBAMA needs your vote on Tuesday!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Uthea Romero   March 10th, 2008 7:30 pm ET

Hillary Clinton for President and John Edwards for Vice-President would be the better vote. I always have vote republican in the past and would vote for John McCain if Hillary and Obama are on the same ticket.
I do not see them as a dream ticket, how could Hillary choose Obama, he is so inexperience and would be a grave mistake to her platform. Especially, when John McCain makes his VP choice.

sharon   March 10th, 2008 7:29 pm ET

Racism isn't as prevalent in today's society as it was 30 years ago
(I speak from experience) Hardly anyone thinks badly of interracial
marriages anymore, for instance. Whites and blacks attend the same
school, use the same toilets, restuarants etc. And just to show you
that his race DOESN'T make a difference with most voters, Barack
Obama has done exceedingly well in the south, including Texas,
where "Ms Ironsides" barely squeaked out a victory. If you counted the
caucuses, Barack actually won.
He is the most honest of the 3 candidates, the most sincere, the least
critical and has acted like a gentleman in spite of the barrage of insults spewing from "Old Ironsides" mouth! He has been level-headed and steady as a rock! What he lacks in experience (if that's
what you call what Hillary supposedly has) he makes up for it with his steadfastness, level-headedness and judgement.
And he is gonna walk all over Mr. Ancient McCain (if he lives that long)
in November! because with McCain, you get 4 more years of Bush!
I wouldn't be surprised if he announced Dubya is his running mate!

Anonymous   March 10th, 2008 7:29 pm ET

After the negative ad (3 A.M) placed by Clinton recently, I am just wondering how negative she could go if she became the president and apply the same technique whenever she has to fight an issue. This kind of negativity is not good for the nation or the world. We have to think about these things before selecting the right candidate for nominee, rather than going thru pain for 4 or 8 years. I guess some great leaders have to come out and help the nation now rather than later.

bakersfield   March 10th, 2008 7:29 pm ET

he will not get the spanish vote, to deep of divide created by the african americans. obama double speaks all politicians do they are almost all lawyers. listen to what they don't say. what he is not saying will he decline the v.p. if he is not the nominee. so put all this together for me will you.
have a question?
obama wins younger voters and voters over 50,000.00, clinton wins votes from older and below 50,000.00, poorer and older people would not or can not be there for the caucus's it makes since with this type of demographic that he would win the caucus's. the states go with caucus's because the dnc pays for it primary's the states pay for . so are these caucus's really a reflection of the state and during the general election do they have caucus because doesn't it seem to reason if they are all primary's in the general election obama won't fair as well just like i don't believe he would even be in the lead now if it wasn't for the caucus's example texas hillary won the primary but lost the caucus can somebody bring this up in explicit detail during the news, i'm sure this would be something the superdelegates would like to consider.

Agatha Kerry   March 10th, 2008 7:29 pm ET

Obama would be terrified to have Senator Clinton as a VP.
My daughter tells me that guys tell her "not to emasculate the guy" when she tries to take care of him. LOL.

Obama would feel so emasculated if Senator Clinton had to help him out. That's why it is so easy for Senator Clinton to offer Obama the VP role because she is smarter and more experienced and doesn't worry about being emasculated.

Bryan J   March 10th, 2008 7:29 pm ET

It's obvious that those Hillary supporters who site Obama's "criminal activity" or "affiliation to religious groups" are the same types of people who voted for George Bush for two terms. They fall for all of the unterhanded political tactics that take your ocus off of the candidates' true qualities and get you off into the weeds. For a Hillary supporter to suggest that Obama is involved with criminals is laughable. Where is Hillary Clinton's finance director fro her Senate campaign? In jail for falsely recording HER campaign contributions. Then she donates $5 Million to her own campaign nad Lord knows where that money came from. I think it's taking longer for Hill to produce tax returns than it did for Bush to send troops tothe Gulf Coast after Hurricane Katrina!

Rick   March 10th, 2008 7:29 pm ET

It will never work, Hillzila and Billzila will never get Obama on a ticket with them. Obama is smarter than the monster twins of Hill and Bill. We all know that the only way Hillary can win is to get Obama on her side, but why would the front runner want 2nd place. Oh I forgot, Hillary got all that experience from sliming fish, but it seems with all her experience Obama is still out in front . Status Quo, thats what Hill and Bill want, same ole same ole but the change train is coming so get out of the way ...........

BobC   March 10th, 2008 7:28 pm ET

This fall, when it comes to choosing Obama or McCain, I will be one of those coveted undecided voters. But I will NOT vote for a ticket with Clinton on it in either spot. Clinton in the top spot is just more politics as usual. Clinton as VP would represent a betrayal of Obama's primary message and would validate the Clinton mantra that he is all talk.

Paul, Northern Ireland, UK   March 10th, 2008 7:28 pm ET

I cannot believe that people actually vote for that woman. Are people really that stupid?! I'm from the UK, and have been glued to this democratic race (and watching McCain when I couldn't sleep, which put me out like a light). Clinton is sneaky, snide, sleeked, insincere, vindictive, and power-hungry. She would sell her own grandmother, just to win. She really must have a big problem with insecurity, given how she tells blatant lies about Obama, then goes out of her way to be publicly offended when she gets a taste of her own medicine (re: "Shame on you, Barack Obama!")! After everything low-down and nasty she has said about Obama, along with the fear politics strategy she has adopted recently, I was shocked that people were still voting for her. She appears to be very good at covering things up and making the public forget how nasty and underhanded she can be, but surely, SURELY you people who support her can see through her? I wouldn't want someone with her character and attitude running MY country, and I'm astounded that so many of you Americans want a person of such ill repute to run yours!
Obama is, by a country mile, the best candidate, and on so many levels. If you're smart, you'll vote for him

Lynn   March 10th, 2008 7:28 pm ET

...and Obama keeps windening the gap...another superdelgate today...that amkes 44 for Obama since Super Tuesday and -5 for Hillary...give it up Hillary...you are dividing the party and showing your lack of integrity which is needed at this time in American history.

You've answered her barack...just keep doing what you are doing!!

Phil   March 10th, 2008 7:28 pm ET

If Hillary wins the nomination, which she could well do, he may regret turning his nose up at the idea of a vice presidential spot on her ticket. If he loses this time around, it will mean his inexperience has been recognized by the voters, and being vice president would be a good way to accrue some experience and credentials to make him a viable candidate 8 years down the road. I hope he doesn't let his arrogance get the best of him.

Anonymous   March 10th, 2008 7:28 pm ET

I don`t think she will gain anything from it. Hillary should keep sticking it to him and keep him on yhe ropes.Her constant offensive moves is what gave her the three victories last week. Obama is a cry baby with thin skin and seems to choke when being attacked, so I don`t know why she would even be so kind as to make the offer. Obama is just going to make her look silly by snubbing the idea of being number two. He sure has no intention of asking Hillary to be his VP. Hillary can`t win anyway, because if it comes down to super delegates, they will go with Obama. They will give in to the fear of racial riot or claims of discrimination, instead of voting the way their heart tells them two. The whole super delegate system should be outlawed. What gives these people the right to cast two votes, when it is illegal for you and I to do the same.

Jason   March 10th, 2008 7:27 pm ET

This is in response to saying that Obama is complaining and whining about the same old politics.

Let's see here. Clinton is saying the pledged delegates shouldn't matter to the superdelegates because she knows she won't win if the superdelegates voted the way their states did. Clinton is saying the media is favoring Obama, but after she wins three states, those talks stopped. I bet after the Wyoming victory and tomorrow's Mississippi victory, those talks will resume. What about the statement that even pledged delegates don't have to officially vote their way their state does. Yeah, you're right, Obama is a whiner, not quite.

The reality is she is trying to find any kind of scapegoat to win the nomination, cuz she's not getting the win from the american people, especially those that she is belittling in the "not important" states. I forgot that only people who live in big states opinions matter.

G   March 10th, 2008 7:27 pm ET

I might consider Hillary as VP with Barach as President. Though, I don't think Barach could put up with Hillary's garbage. This would not be a dream ticket but it would be better than the other way around.

SHANE IN CHICAGO   March 10th, 2008 7:27 pm ET

"I'M PROUD TO HAVE RUN WITH BARACK"
"SHAME ON YOU, BARACK!"
" . . .WHO DO YOU WANT ANSWERING THE PHONE?"
"HE'D BE A PERFECT VICE PRESIDENT."

. . . . . . . BOTTOM LINE, I DON'T LIKE THE CLINTONS . . . . .AND BY "CLINTONS", I DON'T MEAN BILL 7 HILLARY, I MEAN ALL THE HILLARIES I'VE SEEN SO FAR. HARD TO KEEP TRACK.

Janet   March 10th, 2008 7:27 pm ET

This is just another example of Hillary trying to win by any means. So far, she's cried, told voters that they helped her find her voice, claimed the press was victimizing her, and suggested that votes from MI and FL should count even though Barack wasn't even on the ballot in MI. She's been riding Bill's coattails into the White House since the beginning of the campaign and now she's trying to ride Barack's. Is this the kind of woman we want to be the first female president? I don't think so. I want the first female president to be a strong woman with integrity who achieves the presidency on her own merits.

onecandidate   March 10th, 2008 7:27 pm ET

Which democrat (not a spelling mistake) is promising to end the war?
Both.
Which one voted for it?
Clinton.
Which one votes to fund it?
Obama.
Which one will end it in a year?
Niether.

Ron Paul is the only candidate.

CA   March 10th, 2008 7:26 pm ET

To Solutions,

We all can tell by your hostility and imature name calling that you are for Hillary!.

Why doesn't CNN show clips of Hillary in the debate when she said and I paraphrase..."With all this mud slinging some will stick"

All she does is sling mud. in fact, I am waist deep in her mud right now.

Obama for VP..this is arguably as good as Obama has to swppe OH, TX, RI and VT or he is a loser.

Where is john edwards in all this???

David T., Toronto, Canada   March 10th, 2008 7:26 pm ET

Why on earth is no one in the Democratic Party calling Hillary Clinton out regarding her overt praise of John McCain while at the same time criticizing Obama? Is this supposed to help the party?

She MUST be well connected! Then again, maybe she has pictures??

Steve Boyer   March 10th, 2008 7:26 pm ET

Obama is running for PRESIDENT, not vice president. And righ tnow, he has more votes, more states, and more delegates than Clinton. How dare any of you suggest he is only "good enough to be her VP?" HE IS WINNING!!!! She is not even fit to be on the ticket. Google search her history and read about her crimes.

Rebecca - CA   March 10th, 2008 7:26 pm ET

She's getting desperate again............................ can't blame her, her advisers must have broke the news to her.... She needs him in order to win in Nov....... but he doesn't need her. She must also know that.....without him agreeing to give her the top spot , her only hope will be to convince the super delegates (the Dem establishment) to go against the will of the people....and steal the nomination. Still, without Sen. Obama on the ticket, she likely loses much of the coalition he has created, energizes the Repulicans......and "poof," there goes her self-described life-long ambition..... up in smoke!

The super delegates need to be concerned..... if they overturn the will of the people, it may be at their own peril.

Jane, College Park, MD   March 10th, 2008 7:26 pm ET

I see through her so so clearly.
It is yet another deceptive Karl Rove strategy to get the people of Mississippi to vote for her. When she gets to PA, she will pounce on him again. Mrs Hillary Jerkyl and Hyde.
PA, we are relying on you to put an end to this treacherous drama by the Clintons.

Linoq   March 10th, 2008 7:25 pm ET

The fact is that those are all distraction by the MONSTER. When she was not attacking but discussing policies she was losing ground. Now she went so negative that uneducated people that made up their minds at the last moment voted for her. She will do her best to keep this campaign about anything but fair policies discussion.

Superdelegates, where are you?!?!?!?!??!

Chuck   March 10th, 2008 7:25 pm ET

Dream Ticket!!!
Bill and Hillary are dreaming!!!
They have been since his impeachment!!!
This NY governor scandal reminds us of
why we should not vote for Hillary!!!
The first lady of NY and the former
first lady–standing by her man!!!!

C.Jeyabalan   March 10th, 2008 7:25 pm ET

Inexperience! inexperience!! inexperience!!

What is her experience?

She is not able to manage her husband and her compaign team; do you expect anyone to believe her that she would manage a Super power?

Never. Let's not think about this.

Experience means CLOSED LOOP. Inexperience is OPEN MIND. I will vote for OPEN MIND. Open minded Barack is my choice for today and tomorrow.

Rawr Veroflraptor!- Ca   March 10th, 2008 7:24 pm ET

Its things like this that really help me desicion to never vote for Hillary, period. If she somehow steals the nomination, I'm writting in Obama, or maybe, just maybe, voting for McCain. Anyone would be better than Billary. You got to admit though, that the Clinton's are SO good at manipulation.

HILLLARY 08   March 10th, 2008 7:24 pm ET

Once FL & MI delegates count a revote or not, HILLARY WINS THE NOMINATION! Hillary has won all the major states needed she will have the majority of the vote, more delegates and that will be that. So for all you little dweebs who are dilusional about how significant obamas little red state wins are, think again, they aren't. Get over it Hillary will be the next President of the United States, she is the most qualified her accomplishments back up her abilities to make things happen for ALL Americans, not just the few as obama has demonstrated nothing but getting into bed with rezko, exelon; lying about NAFTA and the IRAQ WAR and the lack of conviction to follow through on anything and obama has got to have won of the most arrogant demeaner I have ever seen. A 1 1/2 year U.S. Senator believes he is entitled to the Presidency, why? because he was a community organizer for 3 years? a state senator who failed at making tuff decisions? who has never accomplished anything during his time in National Service that includes tending to his FOREIGN POLICY DUTIES? I don't think so, NO OBAMA, HE ISN'T DESERVING OF THE HARDEST AND HIGHEST JOB IN THE UNITED STATES!

Justin from West Haven, CT   March 10th, 2008 7:24 pm ET

Clinton/Spitzer '08

The Dream ticket for federal investigation.

Clinton-Peter Paul
Spitzer- the US attorney

Kirby   March 10th, 2008 7:24 pm ET

It doesn't really matter – alone or together they are unelectable. The Dems can't get their act together to find someone worth a second thought.

Rick   March 10th, 2008 7:23 pm ET

I do not know why people are blaming Hillary. Hillary just mentioned that it is possible that one day she and Obama could be on one ticket. President Clinton said it would be a dream ticket to have both on the same ticket because Obama has infact mobilized a good amount of African American support who tend to live in urban areas and Hillary has carried the rural areas. Obviously the Clinton campaign can only say Clinton/Obama and not Obama/Clinton because she is still running for president and she also feels she is better prepared than Obama.

Media is adding its own spin to what was told by Clintons.

One thing is clear Obama is just acting defensive about a ticket with Clinton… this shows how arrogant and over confident he is about himself. He could have just said yes a ticket is possible but weather its Obama/Clinton or Clinton/Obama, only time will tell. “Fox painted by the media hype as a Lion is infact thinking it is a Lion” One rain-wash will expose everything.

Bill   March 10th, 2008 7:23 pm ET

The race is over. At last the "Billary" ticket has thrown in the towel. They finally have admitted they can not win on their own...they need someone else to get them back to the White House. Obama has really stepped up to the plate today and said no way to this final ploy of the Clintons. Finally, AMERICA WINS! No more Bush and no more Clintons....what a breath of fresh air this will be.

Illinois   March 10th, 2008 7:23 pm ET

The ONLY way to bring the party together at this point, whether anyone likes it or not, is to put them both on the same ticket. That way neither side gets the chance to alienate the other candidate...which is a stupid thing to do because we'd definitely lose the White House if people resorted to vindictive behavior just because their candidate didn't get the top spot or the nomination. While both senators are running for president and not willing to take the VP slot AT THIS TIME, it will be a very different point of view once one of them becomes the nominee.

I can't understand why people think that these two candidates will end up hating each other. It doesn't make any difference what happens on the campaign trail....it's all politics and anyone who has any common sense about politics knows that. At the end of the day neither one cares about what one has said about the other....it's all political positioning.

Anonymous   March 10th, 2008 7:23 pm ET

Please people start seeing just how devisive and corrupt Hillary Clinton is and for the person who thinks she is brillant with political acumen I don't agree with that at all. Why on earth would we as a nation ever want a person in our highest office with the kind of junk Hillary is putting out.It really says something about those you continually tell us what a great political Bill Clinton is because he has duped, connived, and lied his way into the White House. They are corrupted on evry level. I say this says more about us them them.I was fooled by them (Bill and Hillary) once I have finally awaken and will not be fooled again! Just one more thing, Let's examine Hillary judgement I' m remembering how she stood by the Gov.of New York with his immigration views what happening with him right now.Oh well, I guess another one of Bill's friends has been caught!!!!

Kim   March 10th, 2008 7:22 pm ET

For those touting Obama as VP then as President in 2016, have you forgotten Al Gore??? Obama would no more be able to springboard to president after serving under Hillary Clinton than Al Gore was able to use his vice-presidency as a springboard to the presidency after 8 years of Bill Clinton. Obama would be better served to stay in the senate.

Sarah L, Fayetteville, AR   March 10th, 2008 7:22 pm ET

Let's be clear, if Hillary cared about unifying the party, she wouldn't still be in the race.

Paul   March 10th, 2008 7:21 pm ET

Clintons are now making people realize are they really sure to have Obama as President ...the more posts I read it is evident that even Obama supporters deep inside their heart are now skeptical to see him as President. People are now forced to think how important experience is for the post of 'President of USA'. Talk and personality are important but the most important for a President is to be able to take decisions when asked upon and not just say 'I am present'. Hillary is the one who can take decisions; Obama needs some more time to mature.

Vote Hillary 08

Anonymous   March 10th, 2008 7:21 pm ET

THIS IS COMPLETELY REDICULOUS! HOW CAN SOMEONE WHO IS BEHIND IN THE POLES SAY TO THE PERSON AHEAD SAY "HEY YOU WOULD BE A GREAT VP FOR ME." SINCE WHEN DOES SECOND PLACE GET TO DO THAT?

Ben in Minneapolis   March 10th, 2008 7:21 pm ET

CNN you are so predictable. Set up blogs for these obsessed Obama sheep to rant and rave. I hate to say it, but I am another in long line of Clinton supporters turning to FOX news for un-baised reporting. Honestly makes me sick.

Life28SBK   March 10th, 2008 7:21 pm ET

Hillary Clinton is a secret Obama supporter also... lol

Darnell   March 10th, 2008 7:21 pm ET

...Would someone mind informing Bill and Hill that Barack Obama is running for President of the United States.

shawn   March 10th, 2008 7:20 pm ET

who cares if they dance in the streets . we will dance in the streets too when barack obama is president. I moved from N.Y. to P.A.. Hillary Clinton did nothing for N.Y. then and can't do anything for U.S.A. today

prakash chand for HILLARY   March 10th, 2008 7:20 pm ET

Obama better takae the offer before he is out of a job.

He will be good butler.

yvonne guy   March 10th, 2008 7:19 pm ET

hillary keep flip, flopping, she cannot make important judgement, because she has no control, over which one of her split personalites will appear & at what time it will appear, i suddenly hope america won,t let it out at 3:00 am

cate kennedy   March 10th, 2008 7:19 pm ET

Obama aka Barry S is not worthy of any office. He's motivated by ego , has little or no experience in politics let alone in running an office for this government, and should be put out to pasture to run an evangelical organization.

If Obama is on any ticket many of us will jump platforms and vote for McCain. Barry is just too dog gone dangerous and annoying!

Find another one Hillary!!

doug   March 10th, 2008 7:19 pm ET

Obama is very arrogant to deny VP. Wait and see if he can win in November if he is a democrat nominee. I like Hillary make a offer because she wants to unite the party and wants democrat to govern for 16 years. He is not ready to be a command in chief and he needs to learn more while he is vp. He is smart but he is very arrogant and he might hurt his political career.

Brian   March 10th, 2008 7:19 pm ET

Jazz, actually you are completely and utterly wrong.

The fact is that the Constitution gives the VP two roles: to break ties in the Senate and to be there if the President gets sick or dies. Those are the only two roles of the Vice President.

I think that being qualified for both if them is absolutely a prerequisite. Anyone who disagrees is a complete moron; sorry to bring the truth.

nikki   March 10th, 2008 7:19 pm ET

to all of the shrillary supporters, please answer this question how much "experience" did bill have in 92' before he became president? All the fairytales about her 35 years of experience need to be exposed for what they are down right lies!!!!!!!!!...

OBAMA 08'!!! YES WE CAN!!!

Noans   March 10th, 2008 7:19 pm ET

McCain/Clinton 08 – two dividers, not uniters. The economy sucks and more of our brave soldiers are dying because of oil, as Karl Rove finally admitted on FOX "NOISE." But Senator Clintoon avoids discussing these pressing issues for Americans by making the conversation about her and her "moral right" to be the nominee. Senator Clinton voted for this war and the Lieberman amendment to give Bush the same unfettered power to attack Iran whenever he feels like it and she says she has better judgment than Obama, who was AGAINST the war. Senator Clinton supported NAFTA, until she began running for the nomination. The Canadian government apologized to Obama and his campaign and stated it was Senator Clinton's campaign who contacted them and gave them the "wink, wink" comment. So much for change, honesty and trustworthiness from Senator Clinton. Now she is trying to send Obama to the back of the bus by saying a vote for her is a vote for Obama. I don't think so. Why would anyone vote for a candidate who lies to us, refuses to accept the democratic voting process and our votes for the nominee and refuses to accept responsibility for her votes. If Senator Clinton refuses to count and accept my vote, then I will return the favor by not voting unless Obama becomes an independent. Senator Clinton is just like Bush. Remember 2000 AND 2004? Hillary is pulling the same crap. She would rather see a Republican in the White House again rather than unite the party and win the White House by accepting our votes and the fairly elected delegates.

Obama/Edwards 08, Obama/Richardson 08, Obama/Dodd 08, in other words, Obama and any body else but Senator Clinton.

Jed in Texas   March 10th, 2008 7:19 pm ET

No.Hillary should just turn out the light and say goodnight.

Eli   March 10th, 2008 7:19 pm ET

Why is that Hillary can say its possible but of course I want the top and people go off on her, I dont see why either candidate can not say that. Obama can say I dont want Hillary on the ticket(VP or not) no where and its ok. I mean these two people have gotten close to the same votes so they would be a dream ticket. Hillary sees that but Obama does not want any part of it because he thinks the people voting for Hillary are true DEMOCRATS and will just switch over to him. WELL HES WRONG. Ive talked to many who will not vote for OBAMA in the fall. Hillary sees that if she gets the nomination to pick Obama would be great but Obama does not see that if he got the nomination he should pick Hillary (WHAT A STUPID MAN)

Terry, TX   March 10th, 2008 7:18 pm ET

ONE THING IS SURE:

Obama does not deserve to be Hillary's VP, but Gov. Eliot Spitzer does.

Maestroh   March 10th, 2008 7:18 pm ET

Just imagine: if a person is THIS arrogant – sitting in second place and offering the silver medal to the leader – as a senator, just IMAGINE how bad she'd be once elected?

Did we learn nothing from the past 7 years?

Richard Rodriguez Rivera   March 10th, 2008 7:18 pm ET

She knows she don't have neither the popular vote nor the delegates, so she is now throwing a smoke curtain to see if she can blind the Obama supporters. But you what, She is behind and is not convincing anyone with her charade. She is down and is gonna stay down. Obama 2008, he is the idoneous commander in cheif, thoughtful and with the best proven judgement. What else is there?

Coby Austin, Texas   March 10th, 2008 7:18 pm ET

America the Beautiful wrote:
Many many people will vote for McCain if Obama is the nominee because of too many scandals and past involvments with radical groups and criminal activity. I think that the Clintons know how Obama will be attacked and are actually trying to protect him.

This is a blessing that President Clinton would suggest this idea.

You are sick. Scandals? What Rezko? Dont forget that the Clintons have a friendship with Mr. Rezko also. The Clinton scandals completely outweigh what people are calling scandals from Obama. Stop falling for these snakes called "The Clintons"

Brian   March 10th, 2008 7:18 pm ET

Nothing, and I mean nothing, will draw out Republican voters to the polls in November like a Hillary Clinton Democratic Candidacy. And I think about half the Democratic voters fell as though they can never vote for her, either. She is so divisive and evil.

If she is the Dem Nominee, McCain will win in one of the greatest landslides ever.

Politico Jonze   March 10th, 2008 7:17 pm ET

I can't believe Clintonites are seriously chastising Obama's camp for turning down the potential "Dream Ticket". I just can't believe it took Obama so long to shoot down the possibility.

Also to his stance of not running again or not accepting the VP spot is simple – it gives Hillary's campaign another "out" in that she could then say, hey Obama will run again in four or eight years, this is my last chance – if you like us both, give me the shot now and then Barack next time around.

It's to they point she is looking for sympathy votes it seems. Hey a vote is a vote right?

George   March 10th, 2008 7:17 pm ET

i tell ya Obama people are scary....

tim   March 10th, 2008 7:17 pm ET

a post-racial candidate should not be using terms from a racially divisive man. .

When a uniter says things like "THEY Hoodwinked you," I kept asking who is the you?

JL From PuertO RicO   March 10th, 2008 7:16 pm ET

Well I don't see the terror and the bad things from the Clinton's we were much better with Bill as president. The Bill scandal blahhhhhhhh the people that repeat this just doesn't have anything more to say. So what he is a little loose? lol. I don't care about that all I want is a great president to lead the US to were it was 8 years ago, so if that's one of the reasons why people are criticizing Hillary remove it from your list =).

If she has been reelected with a good margin as a new York senator then something good she most have done there so she isn't useless.
as Obama approved lots of help and support for the victims of Hurricane Katrina, Hillary approved lots of help and support for the 9/11 event.

Both are great candidates but I don't want change all I want is someone to fix things back to how they were.

PR for Hillary!!!!!!!!!!!
I just hope Hillary wins PR and with us get the little boost she needs to be the candidate for the democrats =).

K   March 10th, 2008 7:16 pm ET

NOOBAMA 08

VOTE CLINTON OR NADER 08

Ilene, Livonia MI   March 10th, 2008 7:16 pm ET

Sneaky lying Hillary. She wants to steal his votes. She knows only the uneducated like her. She is playing into their stupidity. She would never ask him. She is lying as usual. Her lips are moving and that means she is lying.

Sal   March 10th, 2008 7:15 pm ET

Still trying to pimp the minority Vote

Shame on who ?

HILLLARY 08   March 10th, 2008 7:15 pm ET

no obama! HILLARY/CLARK 08!

Ilse   March 10th, 2008 7:15 pm ET

If I were Obama, I wouldn't be so quick in closing the door to the VP post. It might hit him in the back. He is now setting the stage for Hillary choosing someone else since Obama is flatly rejecting the number 2 spot. Careful, you might be sorry.

Also, why is Obama, who claims to be the all-inclusive candidate, the candidate for all the people, refusing to seat Florida and Michigan and by doing so excluding million of voters? Well, don't tell me. We all know why.

And one more thing: Obama needs Hillary as much as Hillary needs Obama. He can't win without her supporters on his side. And right now he is alienating her supporters and Hillary is courting his supporters. Now that's inclusivity.

Hillary for all the people.

Clilntonite   March 10th, 2008 7:15 pm ET

Obama is not ready for the big leagues. He will get totally sideswiped by the McCain and republican onslaught...

Hillary has more people coming to vote that don't have cars or phones..They will not show up for Obama..

Latinos want Hillary Plan and Simple!! We will not settle!!

Hillary 08

K   March 10th, 2008 7:15 pm ET

CLINTON, OBAMA AND MCCAIN MORE OF THE SAME

bluebird   March 10th, 2008 7:14 pm ET

obama play the race card again like he did in South Carolina, Obama is using racial language to attack Clinton in Mississippi. Obviously, to get chummy with the voters in language he thinks will work.

... .. See, I was trying to explain to someone the 'okey-doke.' Y’all know the okey-doke? It’s when someone’s trying to bamboozle you, when they’re trying to hoodwink you. They are trying to hoodwink you.

Doc   March 10th, 2008 7:14 pm ET

How good Are experienced presidents, anyway? Suppose you had to choose between two Presidential candidates, one of whom had spent 20 years in Congress plus had considerable other relevant experience and the other of whom had about half a dozen years in the Illinois state legislature and 2 years in Congress. Which one do you think would make a better President? If you chose #1, congratulations, you picked James Buchanan over Abraham Lincoln. Your pick disagrees with that of most historians, who see Lincoln as the greatest President ever and Buchanan as the second worst ever, better only than Warren "Teapot Dome" Harding. Both served in what was probably the most difficult period in American history, where slavery and secession tore the nation asunder.

HILLLARY 08   March 10th, 2008 7:14 pm ET

How the hell is this an ALL DAY STORY? The media and the public continue to ask Hillary and Bill if she would give obama the V.P. she says maybe, Bill says it would be an unstoppable ticket and the media reems them for it, the MSM is back to their old dirty coverage. Don't ask em if you don't like it, other wise shut the hell up!

K   March 10th, 2008 7:14 pm ET

NOOBAMA 08!!!

Illinois voter   March 10th, 2008 7:13 pm ET

From the beginning, Hillary Clinton has run a positive campaign based on her experience.

From the beginning, Obama has run an anti-Hillary campaign. Many people interpret Obama's message of change to mean "not Hillary".

It is Obama's fault that his campaign strategy prevents him from consideing Hillary as a running mate. If Obama is going to benefit from the anti-Hillary vote, he deserves to suffer the consequences of citizens voting for Hillary based upon the possibility of a Hillary/Obama ticket.

Hillary or McCain '08

bill Latimer   March 10th, 2008 7:13 pm ET

What about a Clinton-Clinton ticket?

ABC (anyone but Clinton)   March 10th, 2008 7:13 pm ET

Just when it looks like the arrogance of Billary can't become any greater...her "experience" is a joke. By her rationale, Laura Bush then qualifies for the same degree of experience (minus the Senate years) based on her 8 years as first lady and "visits to (insert number) countries."

It's time for fellow Democrats to wake up and realize that the point of the election is to elect the most visionary nominee who can guide this country over the next few years and improve our standing in the eyes of other nations. Re-electing Bill, this time as a puppetmaster, should not be an option.

Denis da Silva   March 10th, 2008 7:13 pm ET

Does it make sense that she keeps claiming that he won't be ready on day one, yet she wants him to be V.P. ? Does she know who would become President if she had a heart attack on day one? Does she make any sense? Come on even Clinton supporters can't touch this one.

j miller   March 10th, 2008 7:12 pm ET

for those of us who remember; and that does not include you "twenty somethings" when Bill Clinton was president the budget was in the black and we could afford a loaf of bread and a gallon of gas all out of the same paycheck. My vote is with Hillary.

Maurice Jamall   March 10th, 2008 7:12 pm ET

I recall Pres. Clinton's comment when John Kerry selected John Edwards as his running mate. He said that when the candidate makes that choice he knows he has done something right for the country. He has chosen someone who could run the country should anything happen to the president. Hilary Clinton has made no bones about the fact that, in her judgement, Obama is unfit to be C-i-C. What kind of person would risk leaving the country in the hands of an unready? Or maybe she thinks he is ready. What sleazeballs these Clintons are. I used to doubt my Republican friends when they went on and on about the Clintons. Now I know what they mean. She will risk the country's safety in order to get Obama's voters. OR.. she is a mud-flinger who will do and say anything to win the Whitehouse. Either way, SHE has demonstrated to my satisfaction that she is unfit for the highest office.

augustcandi   March 10th, 2008 7:12 pm ET

it would be great if he (obama) got another woman as VP when he becomes president..haha im sure Hillary would love that!

KE   March 10th, 2008 7:12 pm ET

All the super deligates should consider Michigan and Florida when they make decision and who they want as the party leader. Did Sen. Obama served long enough to the party or not?

Sen. Obama may have the "style" but he has no "face". That's how I still feel about him. I don't know what her really represents. It amazes me still how people are so willing to vote for someone who don't know much about and with so many unexamined smokes in the backyard, so willing to wait till he is elected to find out.

Re-vote in Michigan and Florida is also ridiculous. Caucuses are ridiculous also in the big states. Why punish voters who voted to vote again. Why punish tax payers to pay to vote again? This problem should be solved by the party leaders and the states and the candidates. That's what they were voted for to bigin with by the people and paid for by the tax payers.

Sen. Clinton has been right about this all along when she asked voters to hire her for the job. You don't really want to vote for someone and then be told your vote really don't count and don't matter after you already voted.

Next is Pennsylvania, mothers and fathers and grandparents, businessmen and businesswomen and young folks it's time to vote again regardless of your skin colors. I'm for Hillary.

Sal   March 10th, 2008 7:12 pm ET

Obama / Rishardson 08 sounds Great

rich   March 10th, 2008 7:12 pm ET

In my neck of the woods, we would say Hillary Clinton has the gall to suggest that Barack could be VP to her when the woman is running behind by every measure. The gall. Its not even funny.

karen   March 10th, 2008 7:12 pm ET

Obama would lend Hillary credibility, but he would be foolish to align himself with her. Thankfully, Obama is a brilliant leader and won't have any of it!

Ray   March 10th, 2008 7:12 pm ET

Obama should reject, denounce, or whatever else it takes to make the Clintons stop suggesting this. Hillary's disapproval rating is too high, and that ain't gonna change before November (in fact, it may only get worse). She will drown the ticket if she's on it in, and we'll lose the Presidency once again to the Republicans.

If she truly wanted unity, she would offer herself as VP to the clear front-runner in this race – but instead, she borders on delusional with this VP offer to Obama. She talks about states like Florida and Michigan as if she won them with even a shred of legitimacy. It's amazing. If only she would just go away, but alas, that won't happen. Obama, steer clear of these deceitful Clinton countermeasures if you can...and if you can't, then strategize with your team on how to firmly respond. Don't get any of this on your shoe.

Clinton supporters – this VP tactic is beyond low, and you know it. You might want to spread the lie that this is about "unity", but trust me, we know better! This isn't a "win at all costs" game!

Joel   March 10th, 2008 7:11 pm ET

DREAM TICKET OF CLINTON-OBAMA TOGETHER MAYBE THE ONE DEMOCRATIC CHANCE FOR OBAMA TO BE ONE DAY (8 YEARS HENCE)\ THE PRESIDENT OF THE US. CLINTON MAYNOT ACCEPT
BEING VP TO OBAMA ..IN WHICH CASE OBAMA LOSES.
JUST LOOK AT THE STATES CLINTON WITH OBAMA'S WINS.
OBAMA'S WINS ARE AND WILL BE VOTING REPUBLICAN WITHOUT CLINTON IN THE TICKET. A MCCAIN – BLOOMBERG (NYC MAYOR)
WILL WIN OVER OBAMA AND AN Y OTHER DEMOCRAT) BESIDES CLINTON.. OBAMA STILL CLINGS TO HIS AMBITIOUS SPEECHES
AND REFUSES TO ACCEPT HIS INEXPERIENCE REALITY. REPUBLICANS HAVE NOT YET NOR EVEN BEGAN TO CAREFULLY
SCRUTINISE AND LOOK CAREFULLY AT HIS INADEQUATE RECORD TO BE ELECTED PRESIDENT. THERE WILL BE A TORRENT OF REPUBLICAN NEGATIVE ADS IF OBAMA BECOMES THE DEMOCRATIC NOMINEE. AND THE ELECTION CAMPAIGN WILL BE NOTHING LIKE THE PRIMARIES IN WHICH OBAMA IS COMING OUT UNSCATHED. . MCCAIN WILL MAKE OBAMA LOOK LIKE AN AMATEUR . IRAQ WAR IS THE ONE AND ONLY OBAMA
RALLYING CRY. BUT EVEN THERE, OBAMA JUST DOES NOT HAVE THE FOREIGN POLICY AND WAR EX[ERIENCE THAT MCCAIN HAS.
IF MCCAIN PICKS A FORMIDABLE VP LIKE MAYOR M. BLOOMBERG
OF NEW YORK. OBAMA IS FINISHED. BLOOMBERG OF NY HAS UNLIMITED RESOURCES FOR THE REPUBLICANS.
OBLY HILLARY AND OBAMA TOGETHER CAN WIN.

Alan   March 10th, 2008 7:11 pm ET

It seems, given the banner for Clinton rallies atop CNN's home page daily, and Blitzer's repeated slant towards the Clinton's, that CNN is biased against Obama. This is so irresponsible of a news network the magnitude of CNN, and it's a shame that politics have come to this. I will continue to point those I know who TRUST CNN to take a second look at this network's true colors.

NEVEROBAMA   March 10th, 2008 7:11 pm ET

JB- Judgement is not really a factor for Obama considering he NEVER voted for the war. It is one thing to oppose the war and another to have voted against it. The experience Hillary talks about is only in part the 8 years as First Lady but what she has done since she graduated law school. Her determination to help children, fight for Civil Rights and human rights for 35 years which is more than Obama's 2O years.

MSNBC had a very good documentary of Hillary her life, triumphs and her determination against the insurance companies to give insurance to those who need it. Our fight in not that Obama is a good person which he might be but we need to restore america and Hillary is just the person to do this.

VERY BIG HILLFAN!!!

Gnomepark   March 10th, 2008 7:11 pm ET

Thank you for the offer Mrs. Clinton......but no thank you.

Go Obama!

Sam Rose   March 10th, 2008 7:11 pm ET

Hillary is #2 in pledged delegates?

Obama is in the lead....he is the one that the citizens of the US want to be the nominee-

NOT HER!!!! If he is not good enough to be commander in chief on day one–how could he be VP?
She needs to decide which lie she is going to align with-
This is CLEAR double-speak-and just makes her and Bill look stupid-

More slime-y tricks by the Clinton's-proving once again–they will do and say anything to get votes–

I am sick of the Clintons-and so is most of the USA.

Obama '08

John   March 10th, 2008 7:11 pm ET

The way I look at the whole pingpong game of VP and President,is that – it is abundantly clear that the Democrats have a very talented strong field of candidates visavie Hillary and Barack.The best one will win the nomination and Presidency.Hypothetically,if Obama is not the winner as a nominee:will he go back to the senate?Someone is burning the bridges as they cross them.I think Hillary will win all the way to the White House.Obama should avoid saying no to the VP slot!!,just incase he misses the President's slot! Go Hillary Go!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

gregg 45   March 10th, 2008 7:11 pm ET

it is always rascism is it not when it comes to hillary,,, think obamanites,, obamanation,,,,,,,,,,hillary has always backed the blacks in this country, why for one instance do you really believe obama will? is it because he has the best of both,, or just the hue .... everytime one says anything about obama it is racist,,,its ok to say nasty things about hillary,, shes a white woman,, so she is a fair target,,, think b4 u vote,,, put the church preacher back where he belongs,,, on sunday , go hear his sermon,,, btw , quinn, he does not represent me or my ideas,, the antichrist has arrived and the sheep are following,, good luck,, obamanites greg in north carolina

Sal   March 10th, 2008 7:10 pm ET

Hillary appears to be having a melt down.

april 23 reality will set for the clintons, and thier tarnished legacy because of a greed to have power like Bill.

A women will be president. Hillary is not a presidential women.

She can't inspire. She may loose as senator after this is over.

Same old experience is irrelevant because her judgement continues to be wrong.

Obama 08

RC   March 10th, 2008 7:10 pm ET

I am not surprised her campaign is the one pushing this. If she does manage to steal the Dem. nomination she will need Obama to win. Otherwise she will indeed lose.
When I say steal I do mean steal. Seeing here latest comments suggesting that pledged delegates (caucus, primary or otherwise) have freedom to move thus suggesting the will of the public is irrelevant. I cannot believe she can get away with suggesting that and not be punished at the polls. If she manages to get the nomination than no wonder the U.S. is in the state it is in.

Polly   March 10th, 2008 7:10 pm ET

Excellent SEnator Obama , separate your self from dishonesty, lack of integrity and the Iraq war, the old status quo, politics as usual, and specially from the Clintons, thousands and millions are voting for you because you are not part of the status quo nor are you under the spell of the Clinton Clan.

Yes We Can, we want a different US of AMerica, no more Clintons,
GREEATT, denounce, denounce and separate yourself as far away as possible from the dishonest Clintons.

George the Prognosticator   March 10th, 2008 7:10 pm ET

Hillary barely won Texas. And she certainly did not win any of the states in a high percentage that she needed to claim a "victory." The fact is that people still do not like Hillary and that Obama will continue to lead her in pledged delegates until the race is over. Then the DNC will need to instruct her to step down to avoid ripping the party to shreds.

Personally, if Hillary gets the Dem Nom, I will vote Republican out of protest. She hasn't won it by popular vote and if the super delegates hand it to her, the DNC will be facing the downfall of the Democratic party as a whole.

Thanks for listening!

Beverlee   March 10th, 2008 7:10 pm ET

She would never pick him, this is just a way to suck in more votes....WAKE UP AMERICA!

Democrat in CT   March 10th, 2008 7:09 pm ET

Let's get real. There is no landslide here in any direction. 100 or so delegates are NOTHING. It's still anyone's game. Obama is a charismatic guy with no experience. He would do well to get in as VP and gain some experience for the future, when he would have more qualifications under his belt to be President. The voters need to think about who can beat McCain: If it is an Obama-McCain run, it will be Inexperience vs. Experience and we will end up with another republican in the white house. If it is Clinton-McCain, then we are comparing apples and apples PLUS Clinton's background in the economy (where McCain lacks). She can win against McCain, Obama would have a hard time.

If I were her, I would choose Edwards or someone other than Obama as her VP should she win the nomination. There's been too much water under the bridge to have it be an amicable team. He clearly has a problem with it, even though she doesn't. He doesn't deserve the opportunity with that attitude, and that is what it would be-an opportunity. He's a young guy, he has time. What there isn't time for is a learning curve–This country is a mess, thanks to our current President.

I don't expect this will be printed as the editor is extremely biased towards Obama, but I'll send it anyway.

SIMON   March 10th, 2008 7:09 pm ET

the news people asked clinton in the first place and obama said the same clinton said about the dream ticket in the first obam a and clinton debate

4REAL   March 10th, 2008 7:08 pm ET

Hillary and Spitzer has been drinking some of the damage water. He don't want to leave and neither do Hillary. At least Hillary was rejected by Obama for telling her no way. Now she can't stand to be rejected. Spitzer needs to resign and so do Hillary.

Tom   March 10th, 2008 7:08 pm ET

I will NOT vote for Clinton. Not for president, not for vice president, not for dog-catcher. I am Dem and want to vote Dem. But if the name Clinton is on the Dem ticket, in ANY capacity, my vote goes to McCain.

1988 – George H W Bush
1992 – William Jefferson Clinton
1996 – William Jefferson Clinton
2000 – George W Bush
2004 – George W Bush

Anybody else see a pattern here????

No More Clintons, No More Bushes!!!

spider   March 10th, 2008 7:08 pm ET

Hillary has no shame and is further alienating the American voters, young and old alike, from voting at all in an election that we had all hoped would bring about the kind of change we need.
Way to go, Hillary. Your manipulative and transparent power hungry ways will bring on the demise of the Democratic party and we could end up with four more years of war, torture, economic collapse and the further alienation of our youth.

I've seen it all   March 10th, 2008 7:07 pm ET

Leopards don't change their spots. For those who were too young to remember the Clinton years or those who are losing their memory – you need to take a walk down memory lane.

1. They cut 250,000 personnel from the military – ever wonder why so many of your National Guard neighbors are going overseas for a second and third deployment? Thank the Clintons for making those cuts.

2. Let's see – put together a former Walmart lawyer, a $20 million donation from the Chinese government, normalization of China trade relations, and now you can figure out why HIllary's promising to bring back jobs that started going over there during the Clinton administration.
What I think would be interesting for CNN to do is to dig up some of those campaign stops the Clintons made in Ohio and Pennsylvania – and replay the promises they made back then – and then measure the promises against the reality.

3. Johnny Huang, Norman Hsu – just google them – you'll figure out the rest.

Aaron   March 10th, 2008 7:07 pm ET

Obama supporters are sheep! Baaaaaahhhhhh!!!

Ram   March 10th, 2008 7:07 pm ET

Hillary lost my respect, as little Ihad for her ,by playing this game. This is pathetic that she and Bill are stirring up this speculation inorder to try and make people consider that she is "experienced" and that Obama needs "seasoning".

This very act of Hillary and Bill shows how desperate the Clinton team is and showcases how they'll do "anything" to turn a situation to their benefit.

What a bunch of LOSERS!!

bigben   March 10th, 2008 7:07 pm ET

Hey Obama , go win some more republican states.

R   March 10th, 2008 7:07 pm ET

I would prefer her going for John Edwards, but I'm sure there's no losing with this ticket although I don't think Obama is a good to be at the office

AJ   March 10th, 2008 7:07 pm ET

You people are nuts...
Clearly Hillary has won the larger states that we are going to win come November. I think Clinton is very smart to talk about the point of a Clinton-Obama ticket, he just shows his inexperience and arrogance even more by saying he will not take VP.

Hillary Clinton will stand up for Americans and make the changes that we need. We do NOT need Obama's leadership when he has no proven experience... where does that get us? We made a change 8 years ago with Bush – and where did that get us? WAKE UP people, get off your stupid Obama train and realize that Hillary Clinton is the answer to what so many of us have been waiting for.

His response just makes me not like him even more. His campaign is all about a new direction and change in politics? Yet what about the woman who called Hillary a monster... do you really think that isn't what Obama has said about her?

maya   March 10th, 2008 7:06 pm ET

Whoops- I meant Independents. Don't want to spoil my point with a spelling error!

A CANUCK   March 10th, 2008 7:06 pm ET

Hillary is getting soooo desperate !!! Barack Obama doesn't have to
"play second fiddle" to anyone...... that's a very old saying.....I hope you
young uns understand it !!

Alan   March 10th, 2008 7:05 pm ET

DOES CNN ENDORSE THE CLINTON'S?

Sasha   March 10th, 2008 7:05 pm ET

NEVEROBAMA,

God has nothing to do with politics! Please keep ignorant religion out of the mix...............

Offbeatrock   March 10th, 2008 7:05 pm ET

Hillary had one chance to deliver on healthcare, but she did not.
By now Hillary should have won the nomination due to name recognition. But she has not been able to do it either. It is unlikely that she will be able to deliver on any of her promises because she has not proved herself to be a good manager. On the other hand by a fair comparison Obama has done remarkablky well in his career so far. Obama is a better choice and more than likely to deliver on the promises than Hillary, be it Healthcar, Economy, or Iraq War.

Last Point – do not listen to Bill Clinton. The man is a liar and has no credibility

Kelly, Austin, Tx   March 10th, 2008 7:05 pm ET

Many people responding to this issue forget that it wasnt either one of the campaigns that initially brought up the thought of the "dream ticket". It was people like you and me, responding to stories brought up by the MEDIA that having both candidates running would be an unstoppable ticket. It appears the MEDIA has also forgotten they fueled this and as is their usual course of action have decided now to blame it on Hillary. During one of the debates in January, each candidate was asked this same question and each candidate said it was too soon to even consider. I also believe that this question was asked during a debate that was sponsored by CNN itself! How outrageous of CNN to now turn it into some kind of of controversy and an evil tactic on Hillary's part to respond to what many of us DO think would be a great ticket. I think it is great that after all of the distortions of fact that the Obama campaign has thrown out there and that the media has all but ignored (NAFTA discussions with the Canadians,flip flop on IRAQI withdrawal with the Scotsman, just to name a few) she has it in her heart to even consider it!

K Warren   March 10th, 2008 7:05 pm ET

Is it possible that because Sen. Obama is leading in both the popular vote as well as delegate, he does not want to waste our time talking about taking the number 2 position? Is it also possible that Sen. Clinton is trying to encourage Obama supporters to look more favorably upon her because she "says" she might consider him for the number 2 position?

I think that there is more arrogance being displayed by the Clinton camp than the Obama camp due to the answers of the above questions.

Understand the value of such rhetoric, and you will have a much better understanding of the gamemanship being displayed by Hillary. I really prefer to have a grownup (Obama in this case) running the country than someone (H. Clinton) who just wants to fool folks in the same manner as Bush. No thanks to Hillary Clinton.

Shawn   March 10th, 2008 7:05 pm ET

So what will the Democrats do if/when Obama wins the most delegates BUT if Hillary is leading the popular vote? Then they have a quandry – pick the delegate winner or the poular vote winner. Refer to Florida in 2000 regarding their quandry. "Selected not elected"

john thomas   March 10th, 2008 7:05 pm ET

i jwant to join others in urging senator obama to consider mrs clinton as his running mate. she is bright and competent. it is unfortunate that she has a propensity to cast herself as a victim.

Gary   March 10th, 2008 7:05 pm ET

I think there is something goin on, I think after PA, it will be a CLINTON/OBAMA ticket! I would love that to happen. There's something that we do not know.....

Good Grief   March 10th, 2008 7:05 pm ET

1. Denial – Check.
2. Anger/Resentment – Check.
3. Bargaining – Check
4. Depression – Pending
5. Acceptance – Pending

Val in PA   March 10th, 2008 7:05 pm ET

Obama embodies the essence of our beautiful melting pot. He engages us in the dialogue, unlike the other candidates that talk at us, and around us, but never really to us. With Obama you not only feel like you will part of the election process, but also a real part of building the nation, helping our fellow americans that are suffering, and redefing our image around the world.

The historical elements of this election go far beyond the contenders. We are looking at possibly changing the red vs. blue landscape to purple. We have an opportunity to show the world that we are a diverse, accepting nation, that affords all citizens the opportunity to lead the nation to a better place. This is a beautiful, beautiful thing. Someday, we may perhaps be the "great nation" we have only claimed to be.

Geoff Diss   March 10th, 2008 7:05 pm ET

The nonsense, arrogance and hypocrisy that Clinton gets away with is incredible. First, she mocks him, and dismisses him as unprepared for the presidency; now she wants him as her 'replacement'. And she's running second. lol

OBAMA 08   March 10th, 2008 7:05 pm ET

I GUESS IT HELPS HER AS MUCH AS ANY OF HER OTHER DELUSIONS.

john   March 10th, 2008 7:05 pm ET

Headline asks: "Does Clinton benefit from so-called 'dream ticket' talk?"

Duh, gee, good question, duh.

Of course it does and you and everyone else knows it. CNN stop patronizing us!!

Shola   March 10th, 2008 7:04 pm ET

Once again people talking without reasoning. Let me pose this question to you. If Obama had asked Hillary Clinton to become his VP when he won 11 states in a row, many would have crucified him for been arrogant. So why is that Clinton wins just two states out of the about 15 states and she then decides she can offer Obama the VP spot? Please answer this question before you attack Obama for been arrogant and foolish because HIllary is the one that is borderline humorous or very arrogant.

dave   March 10th, 2008 7:04 pm ET

Obama comes up again

As a state senator, Barack Obama was consulted on the makeup of a state board...

At the center of controversy in the Tony Rezko trial. The defense showed a 2003 memo to jurors today listing Obama's name, among others, including Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan, as having discussed the Illinois Health Facilities Planning Board.
Among the recommendations on that memo included Stuart Levine, who will act as the government's chief witness in the case. Levine has admitted to taking part in a kickback scheme while he served as a member of the board.
I will post that memo later today when it is released. The government has accused Rezko of stacking that board to ensure that Levine and others would vote his way to make money.

Also today, Jill Hayden, who headed boards and commissions for Gov. Blagojevich testified that Rezko or "T.R." as she said he was referred in the office, held powerful sway over appointments to 300 boards. She said she dealt with Rezko often and that his recommendations, more so than others, usually stuck.

Dan, TX   March 10th, 2008 7:04 pm ET

Hillary already has Marc Rich selected as her VP.

Hillary/Rich '08 !!!!!!!!!!

Joe   March 10th, 2008 7:03 pm ET

The Hillary should give it up and take her loving husband with her. I turn the station when she comes on the t.v. Obama has my vote and wish him success.

Joe

maya   March 10th, 2008 7:03 pm ET

Uh, Jude, with all due respect, how can you possibly say that all states that voted blue will be blue in the general? It's more the big swing states such as Ohio, New Jersey, New York, Florida, etc that are the key. They are called swing states for a reason- and Obama has not shown up to this point that he can capture them. Very concerning esp since we will be running against a moderate Republican (McCain) who will attract many moderate Dems and Independants.

CJ   March 10th, 2008 7:03 pm ET

Cry me a river. The only ticket Hillary needs is a ticket back to New York. Hey Big Apple, take her back, please–she's not ready for prime time.

Isn't there something you can do to keep her away from a camera? If I hear her voice one more time I'm going to move to Canada.

Who cares about Hillary–let's move forward. This country needs someone who will bring us change. Hillary is old news.

This is the best comment yet! I love it – thank for giving us the best message>>> One way flight back to New York and a sock in her mouth to shut up her monotone whinning voice. errrrrrrrrrrrrrr!

Len   March 10th, 2008 7:03 pm ET

Hillarious Clinton has no chance to be President.

She will never win a state that Gore or Kerry lost. She may even lose some of the blues because independents hate the Clintons.

Derrick   March 10th, 2008 7:02 pm ET

It is clear to EVERYONE that Barack Obama IS NOT EXPERIENCED! What is the big problem with having him do some training behind Hillary Clinton?!

I think it would be good for him to see how reality works and that this his babbling talk of hope and change are just more political maneuvering, just like the Canadian NAFTA report.

WAKE UP OBAMA FANS! He is blowing hot air, and you are inhaling it! Good, clean, and fair politicians DO NOT make it this far in the game without cheating, lying, and taking money from special interests groups. Barack Obama did some bad, secretive deals to get this far! YOU BETTER BELIEVE IT!

Hillary 08' 12'

Gil - California   March 10th, 2008 7:02 pm ET

Not only is Hillary not qualified to be president, she is not qualified to be in politics (sorry NY). She is not going to win but even as a loser I would not be surprised to see her turn on anyone who did not support her.

She is still putting all her hopes into stealing the election by using the Super Delegates. Failing at that she will do everything in her power to sink Barack's chances so she can run again in 4 years. It will do no good, I won't vote for her then either. No Hillary, NEVER!

CJ   March 10th, 2008 7:02 pm ET

Cry me a river. The only ticket Hillary needs is a ticket back to New York. Hey Big Apple, take her back, please–she's not ready for prime time.

Isn't there something you can do to keep her away from a camera? If I hear her voice one more time I'm going to move to Canada.

Who cares about Hillary–let's move forward. This country needs someone who will bring us change. Hillary is old news.

This is the best comment yet! I love it – thank for giving us the best message>>> One way flight back to New York and a sock in her mouth to shut up her monotone whinning voice. errrrrrrrrrrrrrr!

Dancindukes   March 10th, 2008 7:02 pm ET

Is she going to leave her ego to Harvard Medical School?

John   March 10th, 2008 7:02 pm ET

"...vote for both of you"??? What rational-minded person can't tell the huge differences between Hilary and Barack ...even if personal integrity alone was the only characteristic considered? I'll tell you what I'd like to vote for – I'd like to vote both Bill and Hilary off our continent (preferably to the moon).

James   March 10th, 2008 7:01 pm ET

Senator Clinton's argument for Sen. Obama as VP is now a boomerang. Sen Obama needs to cut an effective commercial on this issue in the PA primary

Double-speaking and hair-slitting arguments, exemplified by the Clintons, galvanize the Republicans to oppose all moves by Democrats.

A Clinton presidency = gridlock in Washington + payday to lobbyists.

mike   March 10th, 2008 7:01 pm ET

Watching this clinton rally from scranton. Does she just copy everything Obama talks about earlier in the day. She is a joke.

Judy   March 10th, 2008 7:01 pm ET

Hey Hillary....SCOREBOARD

That's right, do the math, the only way you can win is to somehow steal the nomination from Obama. He won't be happy, his supporters will go elsewhere, president McCain.

Pay attention superdels and Democrats, are you ready to lose the next generation for that old bat?

Lana   March 10th, 2008 7:01 pm ET

I will NOT vote for obama without clinton. I will vote for clinton without obama. If Clinton does not win the nomination then I will push for LOU DOBBS to run for president as an Independent.

RS   March 10th, 2008 7:00 pm ET

Hello Clinton News Network:

Sen. Obama has decisively wiped out all this joint ticket BS Hillary, Bill & Wolfoson have been sending your way to amp up.

Have some shame and post about Sen. Obama's reply and cover it on TV as much as you've covered the absurdities of the Clintons.

Wisconsin   March 10th, 2008 6:59 pm ET

What more do people have to hear before they realize that Hillary will say anything to get elected???

First Obama doesn't have experience, now he has enough.

At 3am the girl in the ads wants Obama for President and so do we all!

BTW When will Wolf get off the Hillary bandwagon? Dream ticket! Hell no Hillary Must Go!

RW   March 10th, 2008 6:59 pm ET

Smart move by Hillary.

If Obama wins, that two-face will probably try and stiff her on the VP offer so she's getting the idea out there now so it'll have so much steam by the convention that he cannot deny her at least an offer of VP.

Hillary also potentially takes some fence sitters away from Obama in the remaining contests and superdelegate race. It's a long shot, but it could help even things up.

We_Are_For_Obama_And_Hate_Clintons   March 10th, 2008 6:59 pm ET

Question for CNN: (And News Media)

There are thousands of notes like above about Hillary's fear mongering ads, dirty tactics that she uses to win WhiteHouse at any cost, distroying innocent peoples' lives and tons of other dirty things that she does to win this election; all of those are protrayed on-line.

Whey does'nt CNN and News Media read these notes (America's Voice) how the country feels about her and think about her?

Especially to Hillary and Bil Clinton..! Or CNN is protecting them?

Cami   March 10th, 2008 6:59 pm ET

I could actually go for a Clinton/Obama or Obama/Clinton ticket, if it would put an end to all the internal bickering. If Obama is ahead with delegates, states, and popular vote, though, he should be the nominee.

Randy - Denver   March 10th, 2008 6:59 pm ET

Jazz please read your US history the qualifications for vice president are EXACTLY the same as for president, and not only that for a long time the loser in the presidential race was the vice president. sheesh folks even the basics are lost now!

wendy   March 10th, 2008 6:59 pm ET

My comment is about Gov. Spitzer. If the leader of my party betrays his marriage vow to his wife ,how can I trust that person to represent me who he doesn't even know? I also didn't like the fact that he dragged his wife to the podium with him to help wash his dirty laundry. I felt so sorry for his wife and children for the negative publicity that they are having to endure.
Please do the right thing, Gov. Spitzer, and resign immediately.

maggie   March 10th, 2008 6:58 pm ET

Hey, bimmer! I agree with everything you said. Too many unanswered questions about Obama. We need to find out everything before we put him in charge of anything!

Louis   March 10th, 2008 6:58 pm ET

Just so you know, Obama won Texas. by at least 3 delegates and anywhere from 5-20K votes.

Laura J Walker   March 10th, 2008 6:58 pm ET

Can you people in the media be any more obtuse?

The Clintons are masters of the political game - masters! They're showing you and Barack Obama who owns this game. CLUE: It isn't you and it certainly isn't Barack Obama!

Obama can't stand to be upstaged and he's showing it now. If Hillary Clinton has done anything it is to show how shallow and image-based this man is. His own Senate colleagues have called him a dilletante. Somebody with an ego that huge can't stand being in the shadows - be it the U.S. Senate or the Vice-presidency. So when he sticks it out there with his outraged righteousness ("Don't be hoodwinked"), who wins? C.L.I.N.T.O.N!

Hillary Clinton learned how to play hardball with three brothers. Believe me, having that as your learning base pays off!

Clinton is spinning the media and Barack Obama round and round and I love every minute of it!

Texas4Obama   March 10th, 2008 6:58 pm ET

Hillary is it time for you to get a hearing aide!

Senator Obama said NO to your silly suggestion.

Get over it and stop trying to fool the uneducated voters!

Shame on you Billary!

Means and Ends   March 10th, 2008 6:58 pm ET

Why doesn't Obama more forcefully use this to drive home his own point when he is asked about it, i.e:

"I think it's a great idea. Frankly I'd be a little concerned about Senator Clinton's ability to govern without polarizing the country into years of gridlock, but I think that with the benefit of a couple years as my number 2 she could likely transition into that kind of leadership should anything happen to me. So yes, I would certainly consider adding her to my ticket if I should win the nomination and if I come to the conclusion that this is the best way to unite our party going forward."

amy   March 10th, 2008 6:57 pm ET

come on ladies in American do we really want someone that can't keep her word when it benifts her own agenda. She has nothing else to throw at Obama so now she want his voters to think she will ask him to be VP are you kidding. If you don't thinks he has the exprience why would you want him as you pick. than again you don't think your voter are smart enought to get it.shame on you Hilary Clinton

HeatherDem   March 10th, 2008 6:57 pm ET

Candy Crowley (a very obviously pro-Obama reporter) can SAY that Clinton's offer of VP is just political maneuvering, but it's also the case that if Obama were to say "yes" then Clinton would have to come through. Therefore, she must also be sincere. I'm so sick and tired of everyone questioning the motives behind everything anyone whose last name is Clinton says or does.

Christine   March 10th, 2008 6:57 pm ET

Hillary should suggest that she, herself, run for VP since she is the one losing in terms of popular votes, delegates AND states.

David, Silver Spring, MD   March 10th, 2008 6:57 pm ET

Why is HRC suggesting a Clinton-Obama ticket?

1) She knows she can't win without him.
2) It's the closest she can get to being endorsed by Obama.
3) She realizes just how qualified he is to step in and be President.
4) She's trying to keep her name in the news until she starts throwing mud two weeks from the Pennsylvania primary.

The Objective Observer in NY   March 10th, 2008 6:57 pm ET

I kept hearing this crazy idea of a Clinton & Obama ticket. Base on the little I know about our politics, Sen. Obama political career would be permanently tarnished should he foolishly decide to join force with any Clinton. Apart from the few fixated fanatics who are unable to think out of the box, most Americans know these Clintons are plitical liabilities. They are the shameless masters of dirty politicking/politricking. Just look at the many spins and distortions they have engineered since these primary elections started

MCNEIL   March 10th, 2008 6:57 pm ET

HILARY CLINTON SHOULD PICK JOHN EDWARDS FOR VP AND ONLY HIM.......... FORGET ABOUT OBAMA........

Mark   March 10th, 2008 6:56 pm ET

Of course it is ridiculous that Hillary should "offer" Obama the VP slot. He is ahead in this race by every measurable statistic. By the way, did everyone notice that CNN has finally updated the delegate count? Obama now leads in overall delegates by about 115, and in pledged delegates, his lead is almost to 150 (Nearly the TOTAL delegates that Pennsylvania offers...). Hillary is losing, and her desperation would almost be funny if it wasn't so pathetic. Actually, forget that. It IS funny.

As for the superdelegates- I would venture a guess and say that most of them actually follow politics pretty closely. They are not likely to be hoodwinked and double talked the way the voters in some states (Ohio) are. Hillary's "spin" might work with people who are too lazy to actually read a whole story, but the superdelegates will see through all that crap. They will be paying attention to things like: Who is actually managing their campaign better? Who has the best fund raising capability? Who is ahead in nearly every poll against John McCain? Who is drawing the most new blood to the Democratic party? Who have the people chosen as the Democratic candidate, or who has the lead in PLEDGED delegates? Who is most likely to attract "swing" voters? etc., etc.

Even if the Republicans try to mess up our primaries by crossing over to vote for Hillary, do you think our superdelegates won't notice?

We_Are_For_Obama_And_Hate_Clintons   March 10th, 2008 6:56 pm ET

Question for CNN: (And News Media)

There are thousands of notes like above about Hillary's fear mongering ads, dirty tactics that she uses to win WhiteHouse at any cost, distroying innocent peoples' lives and tons of other dirty things that she does to win this election; all of those are protrayed on-line.

Whey does'nt CNN and News Media read these notes (America's Voice) how the country feels about her and think about her?

Michael-Miami Beach   March 10th, 2008 6:56 pm ET

I am an undecided voter living in FL & my take is that this is an EXCELLENT idea for Clinton. However, for OBAMA this is a very bad idea as he stands for freshness & change. I make no judgement as to the need for such traits....There are many quality people to choose with Bill Richardson being an excellent selection.

Zach Barker   March 10th, 2008 6:56 pm ET

Hillary Clinton would contaminate the ticket, that is what the other side is counting on

Looking 2 or 3 years ahead   March 10th, 2008 6:56 pm ET

If Obama wants to get to the white house, it will have to be as an apprentice-hands-on-training VP to Hillary Clinton. Trying to do otherwise is just simply not possible anymore. He cannot be allowed to face McCain by himself in November. You can count on it, but, after June, there will be so much dirt flying around, and so many republican attacks that the American people will be CONVINCED that Obama is like an enthusiastic college graduate trying to become the CEO of the most successful organization in the world. It will look simply ridiculous. Next to McCain’ experience, foreign policy knowledge, patriotism, and integrity, Obama will be exposed as that he really is – - an unproven leader who cannot be taken seriously. Can you see the landslide yet? At that point, Democrats will be asking how could such a selection ever been made? Today, Senator Clinton is talking about a joint ticket. If Obama were smart, he would jump on it immediately. He can potentially write history as the first African American to be in power for sixteen years, 8 as a VP, and 8 as the President. Is it not what he wants? That seems a no-brainer to me.

prcleburne   March 10th, 2008 6:56 pm ET

A man and a woman on the same ticket. Hmmmmm. Clearly the man should be on top. ( Before you ladies go crazy , this a sexy, not a sexist , comment )

Ellie   March 10th, 2008 6:55 pm ET

Where is exactly is her proof of 35 yrs experience? Yes, she was a Governor's wife and she was a "first lady" but all those things she claimed to take owenrship of..please. She is a carpetbagger. If she wanted a senate seat, why didn't stay in Arkansas? Because she knew NY was her ticket into the big league and the voters in NY bought into it. Let's hope the rest of the US does not buy into the Clinton song and dance.

maggie   March 10th, 2008 6:55 pm ET

No Obama! Hillary can do much better. How 'bout Clinton/Rendell. Now that would be unstoppable!

Caryl S. Foster   March 10th, 2008 6:55 pm ET

Thank You Senator Obama for clearly stating for all to understand what is nothing but the Clinton's obvious attempt to "hoodwink" and "bamboozle" undecided undiscerning American voters.

It only remains for you to Thank the Clintons for publicly confirming that you are indeed ready to serve as Commander-in-Chief even if or perhaps because you would only bring a speech to the White House.

Thanks to the Clintons!

Randy - Denver   March 10th, 2008 6:54 pm ET

Earlier she said that she could ahve him on HER ticket as VP because he could be ready to be C in C by this summer. Sounds good but lets follow this reasoning out... if he is ready to be C in C by this summer he should have no problem, after he gets all the briefings after November, taking over in January... therefore her argument about him being "not ready" is by HER OWN WORDS not an argument and so I should no longer have to listen to her degrade his experiance over hers. Not likely but then again Ms. Clinton has often shown an inability to follow a thought to its logical conclusion.

Me personally I think a better dream might be say Obama and oh a governor from lets say NM or Kansas or Missoouri.. several good options from those small unimportant states... maybe even a centralist republican....

fred   March 10th, 2008 6:54 pm ET

Wow that is very interesting. To say hey, "you are not ready for the presidency but you can be next in line". Talk about tryin to manipulate the system. What's funny is that Hillary thinks that people who vote for Obama are dilusional and talked over. Well she obvousily believes that they are delusional if she thinks that they are going to be in line with her and say Hey Obama you can be next. Who's really the delusional one. One comment in on this page said that Obama people were immature and that Hillary is trying to unite the party. That's fine but she has to have the nomination in order to unify the party. Right now she is in second place and doesn't seem likely to get into first place unless she makes a devil with the devil. Also, she needs the superdelegates to go against the people and vote for her. Trust me this is one person who has looked at the facts and chosen Obama, and I am not delusional. I am a college student who along with everyone else can change the world like Obama can. How can you sy that college students are delusional, considering how we are paying thousands of Dollars to get an education? It is a little silly. People just need to face the fact that America needs to change and Hillary cannot give us that change.

OBAMA 08 YES

4Hillary   March 10th, 2008 6:54 pm ET

Obamabots will soon wake up from the daze they have been in and realize they have been "hoodwinked" ..."bamboozeled"!! He REALLY needs to come up with some new words...Someone please lend him some new words! So much for Mr. Uniter and being above the "silly politics" . Bet he gave that one another "wink-wink" He is the Same ol' Same ol'!!!

There goes OB playing the race card again in Mississippi..."vote for me cuz' I am AA"! How about letting them know what you are offering as President..........well, he would need a plan wouldn't he??..., well I guess "words" are all he can offer!

AA should be outraged for him to suggest you have to decide based on race then on something else other then race.

Nicole   March 10th, 2008 6:54 pm ET

It is bizarre, and very arrogant for her to even suggest it. Who in their right mind would suggest that the person who is beating them across the board become their second in command. And why is the suggestion even being taken seriously by the media?

Either she knows something no one else does, or she has finally lost her mind.

Jenny   March 10th, 2008 6:53 pm ET

Hillary, it is sad for you to be in this country and face so many blind people and medias

I appreciate your courage!

God Bless America, God bless Hillary Clinton!

2008 Clinton

Cathy   March 10th, 2008 6:53 pm ET

Why do people keep implying that John Edwards has more experience than Barack Obama? Edwards served one term as a US Senator (6 yrs). Obama served as an Illinois State Senator for 8 years and then as a US Senator for 3 years for a total of 11 years in elected office. That is in addition to his years as a community organizer, civil right attorney and law professor.

Zach Barker   March 10th, 2008 6:53 pm ET

Wolf Blitzer,

You just don't seem to get it.....There is a reason we are voting for Barack Obama, it does not include Tonya Harding...I mean Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Obama Guy   March 10th, 2008 6:53 pm ET

Keri-Texas March 10th, 2008 6:14 pm ET

I don't want a dream ticket. If Obama gets the nod I am voting McCain. I vote Hillary and Edwards as the dream ticket.

Obama needs to quit and go be a minister or a motivational speaker or the next American Idol, but commander-in-chief. NO!!!
===============================================

Keri please log off and go read a book...I will vote McCain before I watch Hilary back door her way to the President seat...how about see go take care of her own state for a change seems they have an opening coming up soon there for Gov. your beacon of Woman empowerment and hope is a fraud...she's a pretender in Cheif...I swear Hilary supporters are clueless you gotta be a women

Deb, IN   March 10th, 2008 6:53 pm ET

The woman is brilliant if you ask me, she knows as does everyone else(with any common sense) that if Obama is the nominee that he will lose to McCain in November.
Ever wonder why Obama is getting so much Republican support? Because the Republicans have their nominee and have had him since February 5th. They are voting for Obama because he will be easier to take down in November.
Wake up America unless you want another Republican in the White House 4 more years.

mike concerned democrate   March 10th, 2008 6:53 pm ET

Great close company of Hillary Clinton – SPITZER!!! What a team..

Spitzer endorses Clinton, says nation in ‘crisis’
By Jeremy Jacobs
Posted: 05/14/07 03:21 PM [ET]
New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer (D) endorsed Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) for the presidency

Condog   March 10th, 2008 6:53 pm ET

No Bama! As President or VP.. Mrs. Clinton is the only valid candidate in the contest today. She possesses the skills to lead the United States forward toward better health care and to stop spending 12 billion a month on the "WAR"..
Step up and support Hillary for President !
Obama never took a stand on voting in his short senate seat. PRESENT is not a vote. With no convictions how can you lead?
Vote for HILLARY as I did in Ohio. She has more diplomacy, clout , and wisdom than Obama could ever wish for...!

jp/michigan   March 10th, 2008 6:53 pm ET

I believe Barak Obama is 'hoodwinking' the American people. I do not trust a man who states he has had a 20 year relationship with a crook like Rezko and state' I did not know he was like that'. He is a bone head or very naive, but he isn't trust worthy.

Eileen from Hillarys own Back Yard Upstate NY   March 10th, 2008 6:53 pm ET

THAT IS HILARIOUS!!
WOULDNT HE REALLY BE HER V VP- AFTER BILL?
I CANNOT BELIEVE THE REMAINING SUPERDELEGATES ARE NOT COMING FORTH TO END THIS MESS. HELLO EDWARDS, RICHARDSON, GORE, ETC- SPEAK UP AND MAKE HER GO AWAY!
FIRST SHE WANTS TO STEAL FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN VIA THE US MAIL- OH THAT WILL WORK AND NOW THIS

UNREAL!
IF SHE THINKS THE ONLY 2 WITH "EXPERIENCE" ARE HER AND MC CAIN-PERHAPS SHE SHOULD HAVE MC CAIN RUN AS HER VP!!

OBAMA '08

Renee Las Vegas   March 10th, 2008 6:53 pm ET

There actually was a time when a dream ticket was feasible to many. But that was before we got a real good whiff of "That Woman"

Debby   March 10th, 2008 6:53 pm ET

Yes,she does benefit because she always mentions issues and why she would be a better commander and chief. I find it funny that Cafferty and Borger talk about Obama being ahead and never include those Michigan and Florida votes. If these 2 states are a do over than it will put Clinton over the top if the votes stay pretty much the same.

CNN why don't you post everyone's comment. You sure post alot of Hillary bashing on here.

Peg   March 10th, 2008 6:53 pm ET

I would not like to see Obama on her ticket, she can do better than him. He is so inexperienced. He needs some more time to be the Commander n Chief. She is a leader. I would rather see John Edwards on her ticket when she wins the nomination.

Go Hillary

Leano   March 10th, 2008 6:52 pm ET

I must say at first that while many have said that Hillary is ready on day one, they have not given us the reasons why she is. It is the simple perception that since she's a Clinton and has been around the white house and therefore she's experienced that has misled people about her. Senator Clinton simply is a Clinton, and that is the only thing that seems to have qualified her for the presidency, though her supporters may see it differently. Clinton yes has been around, but her experience whatever it may be does not in anyway make her the best candidate for the US Presidency... But I must say i find it insulting that even more after making the insulting argument that Obama's crazy to have run for presidency and having failed to give us thoughts on whether she thinks that Obama' not ready to be president, now she wants to present to us the argument that Obama' campaign does not matter, that she's one, and that she'll give Obama a shot at V.P...This is an insult..........Vote for me and Obama will be V.P..voter manipulation...What she's trying to do is take advantage of the fact that voters have expressed that they like them both..She's trying to manipulate us to win...But hey, we did not say that the dream ticket would be a top issue, we did not say that we want a dream ticket that much, that if one of them offered it, we will vote for them on that basis...We just thought that they both would be good presidents.....But we want one of them to win by doing their do....She's subjecting us to a choice that will ultimately marr the issues, and our judgement on what's best for America...We cannot have that....We want to hear who she is, what she stands for, and even tell her what to stand for, and if she does not stand for what we seek, we do not vote for her....Ultimately if in our judgement she's the best Candidate, then she gets the nomination; the we can talk about V.P...That is why Obama is real and genuine on this, that it is presumptuous to talk about V.P positions..This thing goes through stages....Just do not manipulate the process. Be a little more principles Clinton........

Earl   March 10th, 2008 6:52 pm ET

Finally Democrats and Republicans can agree on something. Hillary is divisive, manipulative, and is not good for America.

Obama '08

Jay   March 10th, 2008 6:52 pm ET

Obama has a shot at securing purple states. Accorrding to Survey USA, in a McCain/Obama contest, Obama leads McCain in Colorado, Nevada, VIrginia, and North Dakota; all would be red state pickups (vs. 2000 & 2004) for the Democrats. On top of that , in a McCain/Clinton contest, McCain leads Clinton in Washington and Oregon; both would be blue state pickups for McCain (vs. 2000 & 2004). Hillary does best in foregone blue states, that any given Democrat would win.

Brian Davey   March 10th, 2008 6:52 pm ET

Obama hurt the Party by running for President to soon. He would have been wiser to support a candidate raise funds for them then been their VP Edwards/Obama Ticket would have been unstoppable. I don't know why all these talk show put on so many uneducated people talking from their hearts and not from history as we know it. Kennedy chose Johnson as a running mate under the same conditions as Hillary is now. Obama needs the experience that being VP can bring him

joanna   March 10th, 2008 6:50 pm ET

A perfect case for cynicism! Human conduct is wholly motivated by self-interest. Obama, without a political trail by which the measure of the man may be taken is just an opportunist , politicians of his caliber are a dime a dozen, witness today's news on New York's governor. Nonetheless, those so easily fooled by politicians will keep on swallowing the bs handed out. Once these people are in office, they do whatever darn they please....thanks to those voters who put them in office who lacked the tools by which to analyze the candidates.

markus   March 10th, 2008 6:50 pm ET

wow, Hillary supporters are THAT blind, huh?

my favorite was the following posted by America the Beautiful, saying Hillary should NOT choose Barack because...:

"...because of too many scandals and past involvments with radical groups and criminal activity. I think that the Clintons know how Obama will be attacked and are actually trying to protect him."

WHAT???? I think you have your candidates confused...

this is just as delusional as Hillary HERSELF, offering Vice President to THE FRONTRUNNER, like it's HERS to offer!

what a joke!!!!

C. Wilson   March 10th, 2008 6:50 pm ET

This is a planned Clinton strategy and it also gets her press coverage. All of Obama's press coverage has been "hoodwinked" talk and whining. I would rather have the tough talk.

Obama will be whining when FL, MI, and PA speak. I live in Indiana and I can't wait for May 6.

I think the header to this story is a blatant disregard to what Sen. Clinton stated, it was placed there to stir the anti-Bill sentiment.

Just wait and see... Obama will be spending January in IL and Hillary will be back and Pennsylvania Ave.

By the way, I will be a McCainacrat before I am a Obama Dem. If it isn't Hillary, I will vote Republican for the very first time.

anonymous   March 10th, 2008 6:50 pm ET

Someone should point out to Hillary that the only reason she narrowly won the popular vote in Texas is because republicans would rather run McCain against her and not Obama. It was those republicans that put her over the edge. If Ohio speaks for the nation, why bother to hold elections in the other states? this woman is delusional! If she manages to steal this election, she can't win without Obama. She needs him and he doesn't need her! Also, if everyone agreed not to seat Michigan and Florida delegates, why not just subtract their total number of delegates from the total number needed to win the nomination and be done with it?

Adam - TX   March 10th, 2008 6:50 pm ET

Go Hillary – Way to reach out and try uniting the Democratic party!

When Barack loses Penn, he NEEDS to drop out and become your VP. He cannot carry the general election despite picking up those handfuls of RED midwestern states. Democrats need to start thinking general election strategy and get over the pointless delegate count!

Ed   March 10th, 2008 6:49 pm ET

"God and America love Hillary"?
Umm, okay. I guess you have a direct line to both. And they say we're drinking the Koolaid!!!

Don't throw your vote away.

VOTE FOR OBAMA!!!
VOTE FOR OBAMA!!!
VOTE FOR OBAMA!!!

Franklin   March 10th, 2008 6:49 pm ET

Apparently, hypnotism is not myth. Where is the intellectual gallantry to challenge the Clintons? How is it, the runner-up proclaims victory daily and goes unchallenged? When in history, during a presidential primary, has the losing candidate call upon the victor to accept the vice presidential role?

Senator Barack Obama has won twice as many contests, leads in delegate count, and holds a lead in popular vote. Is there anyone else out there who is not subjected to this mind-altering approach by Senator Clinton? Are you able stand out?

Lake Mary, FL

Franklin

Michael Dunn   March 10th, 2008 6:49 pm ET

Hillary shows no shame; she will say and do anything to get the nomination! People take a close look at this politician, if there is any buyer's remorse to be had I hope Clinton supporters are having it! First with her suggestion that pledged delegates should change their vote, break their word, go against the democratic process, and with this....Absolutely shameless, it's horrible to see things devolve to this; she truly makes me sick, this is the exact reason why Americans have grown to distrust and even dislike politicians.

Mike D   March 10th, 2008 6:48 pm ET

Don't be fooled!

Irritated in Cali   March 10th, 2008 6:48 pm ET

OB supporters, you think you can win the white house without Senator Clinton's supporters? Think again punks, stop offending everyone with your constant attacks.

Pollyann   March 10th, 2008 6:48 pm ET

Please be reminded when Obama spoke of his supporters that they are "DELUSIONAL".

Tito   March 10th, 2008 6:48 pm ET

Only foreign policy experience Hillary had was traveling to the STATE OF DENIAL and occasionally visiting her friends in the SOVERIGN STATE OF LA-LA LAND!

matt   March 10th, 2008 6:47 pm ET

she is brilliant, Bill is brilliant! placing Obama in this position.. Brilliant!

He has placed himself in a position where he cant say he would like her as a Vice President. This gives her full opportunity to take what every one is dreaming of!

I personally feel Obama must learn a lot more before he becomes president. Being Vice president for 8 years would really make him a stronger unbeatable canidate in our future

wild schield   March 10th, 2008 6:47 pm ET

now thats what ya call a reach around

Maria in TX   March 10th, 2008 6:47 pm ET

The Clintons have always had trouble telling the truth, but it seems that they do not do well with MATH, either.

Hillary, go get your taxes and if you ever get ahead in the delgate count, then you can start picking a running mate. Until then act like what you are.......a loser!

deb   March 10th, 2008 6:47 pm ET

I can't believe all of the ignorant ranting going on here in support of Obama. Most of the pro-Obama bloggers can't even write a grammatically correct sentence let alone say anything intelligent. Obama keeps saying over and over "change", "change" only because he knows too many people don't even remember or realize what a wonderful president Bill Clinton was. He's implying that the Bush and Clinton administrations were the same when nothing could be further from the truth. We had a SURPLUS of revenue when Clinton left office, people had jobs, the ecomony was booming, etc., etc., etc. , not to mention the war in Iraq. Obama doesn't have much of a "history" either so how anyone can blindly vote for him is beyond me. Hillary is the right person for the job. She's strong, smart and extremely capable.

HIllary – 2008 and 2016

Obama – "possibly" 2020 and 2024 (only after he's had a little experience)

Leo Daugherty, Charlottesville, VA 22902   March 10th, 2008 6:47 pm ET

I agree completely with Candy Crowley, but I would go further. When the Clintons thought this up, they knew of two other things that would benefit Hillary. First, they knew that Obama would be too prideful to accept the deal ("Me at the top or I walk"); second, they knew that he will never agree to make HER the SAME deal. So they knew that this great twofer dream-ticket idea could not ever become reality, and they also knew that, because he rejects the deal outright, Obama increasingly might get perceived, especially in the eyes of all those white male Democrats who are moving to Hillary, another Shirley Chishom, Jesse Jackson, or Al Sharpton - as just another big–ego African-American who wants to jump straight to the Presidency from nowhere with no experience. Did the Clintons do all of this consciously? Of course they did. That's why I'm for them. They are experienced.

Saska   March 10th, 2008 6:47 pm ET

Now that Obama's turned the tables on her, Hillary was caught off-guard today and made a statement that it was too early to talk about VP's. So, either she disagrees with her surrogates (except for Wolfson, who publicly disagrees with Bill, and they both disagree with Penn.... I can't keep track anymore) or she can't figure out what her message is. I suspect the "dream ticket" was nothing more than a line of BS to try and get the Mississippi voters to vote for her, as she so blatantly says, and it'll all be over tomorrow.

No one in the Clinton campaign ever thinks before running his or her mouth.

Vivien from NY   March 10th, 2008 6:46 pm ET

Hillary would not help Mr Obamas ticket he needs someone with REAL experience , not 35 years of so called experience with no accomplishments.

lacinda sutton   March 10th, 2008 6:46 pm ET

people wake up the news doesnt want hilliary to win.
obama has broke the law here. buying land/ he and his wife hate america... stand up /stand up

Never   March 10th, 2008 6:46 pm ET

Hillary can forget it. This just makes my resolve for Obama (or ANYONE ELSE) for that matter OTHER than her even stronger. Peace out HRC.

I might have thought differently a few months ago before she decided to show her true negavive colors to the world. You reap what you sow Hillary.

AL   March 10th, 2008 6:46 pm ET

Hillary's got that backwards she's still loosing.
Something tells me she's the kind that if she comes second...she won't want to play no more...

NickNasc   March 10th, 2008 6:46 pm ET

Hillary is out of Gas...Even the comments of the BillaryBots are getting more desperate in tone. I am waiting to see next ," I Know you are but what am I?" This is sad.

brianinmississippi   March 10th, 2008 6:46 pm ET

Think about it America...she has the experience...and he could learn a lot...this would be great....we would have Democrats in the office for at least 16 years! Go Hillary 08!

Willie   March 10th, 2008 6:45 pm ET

Obama will not win Flordia and Michigan do-overs(again), Pennsylvania, Kentucky, West Virgina, and he will probably lose in Indiana. Thats the bottom line. Obama needs to be the VP and thats it.

Jay   March 10th, 2008 6:45 pm ET

Clinton doesn't benefit, and Obama suffers too. I know that the more the idea gets mentioned in the media, or by the Clintons, it pushes me a little closer to switching from Obama to McCain.

Ron R   March 10th, 2008 6:45 pm ET

O my lord people...have you had enough yet? Reject this woman and her devisive campaign and lets get on with our future instead of living in the past.

Oregon Voter   March 10th, 2008 6:44 pm ET

Apparently Barack is not a uniter, but instead cares only about his selfish ambition. He won't even entertain the idea that both Hillary and Barack be on the same ticket. How arrogant! Considering that the two of them are dead even, he really shouldn't be acting so foolishly.

Obama and many vocal Obama supports appear to be the dividing factor in this election, not uniting.

D.   March 10th, 2008 6:44 pm ET

No. Please . The Clintons are the GREAT MASTERS !

Senator Clinton needs Senator Obama – he does not need her.

Please do not vote in advanced believing this woe cry. Unless you see this in writing by both cndidates please do not vote on this lie.

Look at the SNL- NOTICE BILL WAS NOT IN HER BED! What are they saying- Bill lost her the election and he is lost out of her life?

VP Spot   March 10th, 2008 6:44 pm ET

Obama thinks he is some kind of mandate. It is a very tight race and he is not going to get the magic number of delegates either. Nothing has been decided as yet – its not over yet. There is no guarantee that Obama will be the nominee and if he is – well, he does not stand a chance anyway because he needs Hillary supporters and you all know how that will pay out now don't you.

WAKE UP!!!!   March 10th, 2008 6:44 pm ET

PEOPLE WAKE UP!!! THIS IS ANOTHER TACTIC. FOR THE HILLARY SUPPORTERS, YOU MUST BE SOMEWHAT DISAPPOINTED. HILLARY AND BILL SAID HE WOULD BE A GREAT VP. DO YOU GUYS KNOW THAT VP IS SOMEONE THAT YOU THINK IS READY TO TAKE CHARGE IF SOMETHING WERE TO HAPPEN TO THE PRESIDENT. SO DOES THIS MEAN THAT HE HAS THE EXPERIENCE NOW?!?!? HILLARY'S DOUBLE TALK!!!!!!
HOW COULD ANYONE SUPPORT HER?

Paul   March 10th, 2008 6:43 pm ET

It is virtually impossible for Hillary to win the nomination according to the numbers. She's needs to win at least 59.5% of the remaining delegates to include superdelegates. Any states where she gets less then 59.5% and her magic number goes up. After Pennsylvania it will likely be in 62-64% if things go according to current polls. Almost impossible. Give up so we can focus on John McCain.

concern citizen   March 10th, 2008 6:43 pm ET

Hillary is presumptious in thinking she is the nominee when she is 140 pledge delagates behind Obama. Her arrogance and entiltlement is evident. In addition, it is a ploy by Hillary to get people to vote for her. First, she states the voters' voices (pledge delagates) don't count. Second, she is advocating for the super delagates to override the majority votes. Third, she is resorting to a vote for her is a vote for Obama since he should be vp. She is making all of the decisions without being attentive to the voters who clearly want Obama since he is ahead. I am puzzled by her comments.

sharon   March 10th, 2008 6:43 pm ET

No Hilary would not benefit if Obama is her VP choice. He is so arrogant he makes me sick. I am tired of all his whining and crying. I will not vote for him, I would rather vote for a man like McCain instead of a baby like Obama. He has so many people brain washed with no subtance to go with it. The press talk about what would happen if Obama lost, that there would be so many disinfranchised voters. My daughter says the same thing. I told her that sometimes kids need to grow up. We older women have been disinfranchised over and over and we still believe tha our vote will count one of these days. You don't always get what you want the first time. It takes an adult to realize that you don't give up when things are not going your way.

Shannon, Charlottesville, Virginia   March 10th, 2008 6:42 pm ET

the clintons have no chance of getting the nomination, but let's suppose they steal it as they are clearly trying to do–the clintons have no way of winning UNLESS obama is on their ticket, so of course they need him–but he does NOT need them, thank god.

the clintons are delusional and dangerous and should bow out now.

mona   March 10th, 2008 6:42 pm ET

Hillary are you for real. If you were winning would you settle for second place? Now I know I don't want you to answer the phone at 3 a.m.
Hopefully the rest of the remaining states that have vote realize it now.
If this is your advisors thinking for you. YOU NEED TO GET OUT NOW!!

Teresa   March 10th, 2008 6:42 pm ET

People, people, these are politicians both Hillary and Obama. Do you honestly believe everything you are hearing??? Hillary is the one with the right stuff for this very important job in the white house, and Obama has a whole lot to learn, though I do hand it to him for learning the political game... Politics people, not hype. Go Hillary get the job done

Texas Independent Voter   March 10th, 2008 6:42 pm ET

Does HILLARY BENEFIT FROM A DREAM TICKET? The answer is obvious...of course she does. Hillary needs Obama, he doesn't need her.

Hillary draws the older white voter and the less educated. What does that tell you? They are easily fooled by Hillary's deceitful tactics and the older white voters would probably not vote for a black President. They don't like change and sure don't like to take chances. They are happy with the same old thing repeated over and over and over again.

TODAY MY 95 YEAR OLD WHITE MOTHER-IN-LAW SAID OBAMA WOULD MAKE A GOOD PRESIDENT. My husband and I have joked about our supporting him and hell freezing over before she would ever recognize a black president. Well ladies and gentlemen I think hell just froze over.

Go Obama.

Susan   March 10th, 2008 6:41 pm ET

Why didn't Hillary offer to be VP to Obama since she's in second place?
If she really wanted to bring everyone together, that's what she would do.

Sue   March 10th, 2008 6:41 pm ET

This is a game about perception. She is trying to convince voters that if they vote for her, they will get Barack Obama on the ticket. Obama would be crazy to be on her ticket. Don't forget what Hillary did to Al Gore when he was VP. I'm sure that Bill will do the same to Barack. If Hillary becomes the nominee, I am going to do a write-in vote. I can't vote for her nor can I vote for a 72-year-old with a hair-trigger temper who is also a war lover. My only hope is Barack Obama!

Guch   March 10th, 2008 6:41 pm ET

I was thinking what was wrong with Clintons that they are offering such a best post to a guy whom they were undermining the whole month.
Now, it is ok for me to guss what they want. hahaha .....
back to The White House! it seems a littel harder now because she is behind him in all count.

Ellen, Pasadena, CA   March 10th, 2008 6:41 pm ET

I am an Obama supporter, but if some of you think the answer is to vote for McCain IF Hillary somehow bullies her way into the nomination, then you don't understand the last 7 years of Republican rule/ruin. If you must, leave it blank, for crying out loud. A vote for McCain would be a vote for more wars, more nation-building, less progress, and more voodoo economics.

Regarding MI and FLA: Where were the Floridians when their party leaders were selling them out by trying to move the primary up despite warnings not to? That's when they should have spoken up. And, in Michigan: In a democratic country, you CAN'T count votes in a state where there was only 1 candidate on the ballot. Capisce? That's what the ballots look like in totalitarian states.

Charlotte   March 10th, 2008 6:41 pm ET

His refusal to consider this, shows he is not the uniter he claims to be. It also frees Hillary from having to choose him as a running mate. She can say, "I offered." Then the dream ticket, I doubt either really wants, is over.

kahtleen   March 10th, 2008 6:41 pm ET

It's disgusting to me that HILARY would be so bold as to think she can decide at this point who will be a running mate for her!
She is turning me off..........

akaDoug   March 10th, 2008 6:40 pm ET

Yeah right!! Who in there right mind would attach their rising star to a sinking ship! Even if he were gracious enough to accept I would never vote for Billary! Been there, done that, time to move on!

And Obama's smart enough to never offer the VP spot to Clinton, there are too many better choices out there than her!

But the media is all for it! After all the media seems to be paid supporters of the Clinton campaign there days.

More states, more delegates, more votes and more money make Obama the only choice!

GO OBAMA!

James RR, PA, Independent   March 10th, 2008 6:40 pm ET

The notion that Obama thinks he is ready to be a President is absurd.
He lacks experience and there's ample of doubts revolving his integrity and honesty as candidate. Obama fooled so many young voters early on and tried to do the same with their parents but failed. His double talking, secret dealings with foreign countries, involvement with corruption, questionable patriotism to his country and his continued bashing of Sen. Clinton doesn't fit him to be Vice President let alone President? He disrespected over 1 million voters in Florida who voted for Sen. Clinton by calling their votes a merely
"Beauty Pagent". He fits the category of the President of the Unprofessional Senator (U. S.) with Karl Rove as his Vice President.
I trust Sen. Clinton to answer that 3 a.m. phone call and make the right judgement for our country and the American people.

Mr. Bilek   March 10th, 2008 6:40 pm ET

The Clintons are so very very predictable in so very very a tiresome way. Self serving, self absorbed, self interested – is this what we need today? Isn't this what we've had, at least as far back as the Reagan years?

Is the globe excited, intrigued, hopeful about either a McCain or Clintons Presidency – NO!

Is the globe excited, intrigued, hopeful about an ObamaPresidency – Yes (WE CAN)!

W has so squandered US good will, internationally ( domestically, he is equally disastrous) that a same old same old Clintons/McCain presidency will just allow our credibility and influence to wither further.

The Clintons Campaign is so phony, it's doomed before it's administration reaches Day One.

Andrew   March 10th, 2008 6:40 pm ET

Man, am I glad to see all the folks supporting Obama. To anyone who thinks this race is "tied", I'd really like to point out that even after Hillary's "landmark victories" in Texas, Ohio, and (laugh inserted here, and I was a Rhode Islander for four years) Rhode Island, she trails him by the same amount she did before, 110 delegates. Seems close? If Hillary had won by 15% in Texas, instead of 4%, she would have made up about 20 delegates. So, she only needs five Texases. No problem.

Incidentally, If Michigan and Florida were counted, even if they went OVERWHELMINGLY Hillary, she still wouldn't take the delegate lead. She still wouldn't be close. Also, it won't because they're pretty much tied in Michigan, but its nice that that's an irrelevant point. And Hillary was the only one who campaigned in either, so what does that tell you?

As for your lovely, ridiculous "big state argument," anyone think Texas is actually going Dem in the national? Or California and New York red?

Well done. Good ol' common sense and math.

Al, Sacramento Ca   March 10th, 2008 6:40 pm ET

I am a Hillary supporter, but Obama does have a point. She is putting him in second. But Obama should not sound too arrogant either, if either one wins it's a dream ticket and they both know it, just neither one is ready to claim second until this primary is all over, us Democrats better not blow this chance.

Hillary-Edwards would also be a dream ticket!

Hillary- President
Obama- VP
Edwards- Attorney General Wow!!

kelly WI   March 10th, 2008 6:38 pm ET

Notice she only hints. thats to try to fool would be Obama voters.
Her on any ticket would be a nightmare. The country is on to her schemes and duplicity. They can try to spin all they want.
Maybe she could ask her good friend and super delegate E. Spitzer to run with her. oh guess not. She needs to be president to pardon him. Wonder if billy was with him. lol more sleazy dem NY politians.
NY sure picks some doozys. lol

Polly   March 10th, 2008 6:38 pm ET

Jude,you forgot one small thing Blue can turn Red as easy as Red will turn blue and if BO will continue with his highly annoying arrogance states like Florida and California can and will do it very easy.

Don, San Francisco   March 10th, 2008 6:38 pm ET

Clinton wanted to appear as if she was willing to bring the Party together at the Convention despite and increasingly negative and divisive primary campaign. Her attempt was, however, a too thinly veiled attempt to attract voters and superdelegates to jump on the Hillary for President wagon (a wagon most appear to be jumping off of). Obama supporters saw through and were insulted rather than swayed and Clinton has ended up looking more deperate than magananmous.

D R   March 10th, 2008 6:38 pm ET

Read Obama's book! It will open your eyes! He has been through much adversity. He has not had a silver spoon stuck in his mouth like Hillary! She has NO CLUE what middle or low income is?

Disgusted   March 10th, 2008 6:38 pm ET

I cant believe all of the stuff i have read about this. The more i read the more Hillary supporters sound like brainwashed zombies. I mean is it even fathomable that they are supporting the Clintons push for the votes in Florida and Michigan to count. How desperate do we need to get here. Saying she wants Obama as a V.P. Please, save your pretentious pandering for people with no imagination and no intelligence. You are the picture perfect image of what we do not and never need for our country. I hope this serves as a reminder to how deceptive Hillary's campaign is and how desperate they are to get to the top. People of Penn. do the right thing and end her run to the white house. We need this nightmare to end so we can move on to realistic and positive change.

Harvey   March 10th, 2008 6:37 pm ET

The party benefits from it. this ticket would almost ensure a Dem president..............whoever it is they face a battle to get anything done they say as the senate / house can stop anything whether majority or not

4 shame   March 10th, 2008 6:37 pm ET

America the Beautiful March 10th, 2008 6:06 pm ET

Personally, I think that the Democratic Party will NOT win the nomination if Obama is the nominee. Many many people will vote for McCain if Obama is the nominee because of too many scandals and past involvments with radical groups and criminal activity. I think that the Clintons know how Obama will be attacked and are actually trying to protect him.

This is a blessing that President Clinton would suggest this idea.

You must be a crackhead. This is one of the dumbest things I have ever heard."a blessing that President Clinton would suggest this idea". LOL...Please get help.

joe m.   March 10th, 2008 6:37 pm ET

what i don't understand is how she can try to sell this VP slot for obama, when she said that any VP choice she makes will be based on the requirement that the VP is ready to be president. with all her attacks against obama not being ready, how will this work? i doth think the sen. speaks with forked tounge. this appears so transparently a ploy that it is insulting to the intelligence of any voter. these kinds of contradicting messages reinforce the belief that sen. clinton is willing to say and do anything to win. yes, she is a fighter, but it appears more and more that she chooses to fight dirty.

Rebecca   March 10th, 2008 6:37 pm ET

Hillary Clinton NEEDS the "Dream Ticket" to win, Obama does not.

Hillary Clinton NEEDs Florida and Michigan to revote, Obama does not.

Obama is in First Place, Hillary Clinton is in Second Place.

Hillary Clinton and her campaign, husband, daughter, and supporters are swinging all all costs, even if it's giving John McCain a great advantage.

Please STOP!

Jenny, Rio Vista, CA   March 10th, 2008 6:36 pm ET

Dream ticket– very funny. Clinton on any part of a ticket would be a NIGHTMARE.

The republicans are chomping at the bit. They can smell Clinton and all her baggage getting closer. They know the leaders of the democratic party have no spine and they can picture them caving in to the slimy Clintons.

Once that happens........democrats will lose so many voters they will wonder what happened..... AGAIN!!

The November election was handed to the Democratics all wrapped up with a bow on top. Slowly but surely, it is coming unraveled and not one party leader has the guts or the no-how to stop it.

Harry Reid is pathetic, Howard Dean is pathetic, Nancy Pelosi does nothing but wag her finger, and what are we left with. BTW: Howard.... good planning. You tell Michigan and Florida their delegates will not count... but you forgot to plan what would happen if the situation that we are in occurred. Very clever. What a chump. I hope the DNC fires your pathetic a..s.

Bob from Buffalo   March 10th, 2008 6:36 pm ET

Hillary will do anything to get into the white house at all costs! It's not going to happen. If Hillary is either the democratic nominee or VP to Obama, which won't happen I'M VOTING FOR McCain.
Do we really believe that she will ask Barrack to be the VP if she wins the nomination after all the negative attacks she's made on Obama?
Come on America wake up!! How can you not see through this shallow woman???

Ron, Honolulu HI   March 10th, 2008 6:36 pm ET

To date, voters have chosen Obama to be president since he has more popular vote and more deligates. So it seems Clinton is leaving it up to herself who becomes president. Ummm...???

Jayson   March 10th, 2008 6:36 pm ET

I don't think Hillary is really in a position to offer the VP slot to anyone; she's losing.

Hillary is the worst possible choice for a candidate. She's really just the opposite side of the George Bush coin; devisive, selfish and cruel. She couldn't build a consensus that the sky was blue,She has no aptitude for leadership and would be a disaster in a position of authority. I don't support Obama because I think he's that GREAT of a candidate but because I know Hillary is truly that BAD. I've voted for Democrats for 24 years but if she slimes her way into the nomination that streak ends this year.

Jill   March 10th, 2008 6:35 pm ET

Clinton has too much "Old Washington" experience. No where near the 35 years she thinks she has but still, way too much.

We don't want anymore "Old Washington" way of doing things.

We want Change.

We want Obama!

Clinton will divide the dems and reps just like her husband did if not more than he did.

Clinton has way too many corruptions, scandles, lies and mistrust to be our President.

Brenda   March 10th, 2008 6:35 pm ET

The Clintons were not almost Impeached-DR. He was impeached. Only Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton have been Impeached. That is the Clinton Legacy. Both Johnson and Clinton were acquited of the charges. But the bottom line is there were both IMPEACHED by The House of Representatives. You remember, "I did not have sexual relations with that woman". Again, we are espousing Clinton's definitions-broad, and vague. I hope the Senate censures Hillary for all of the CRAP she is doing to the Democratic Party. Then her legacy can be that of Aaron Burr and Joseph McCarthy-good group. Hillary for Govenor of NY. Great Job-35 years experience. WIlly can be Lt. Govenor. NY deserves those Carpetbaggers. Oh, as an aside, Andrew Johnson returned to Tenn. and became a distinguished US Senator!! :)

Slap Stick, FLORIDA   March 10th, 2008 6:35 pm ET

Of course she does. She figures that they will get elected if Obama is on that ticket. My Goodness folks, she may be a liar but she is not STUPID.

John   March 10th, 2008 6:34 pm ET

Hillary is starting to sound as delusional as Dubya Bush.

leah   March 10th, 2008 6:34 pm ET

sheer desperation!

OBAMA '08

cindy   March 10th, 2008 6:34 pm ET

The Clintons have 1 less VOTE today their BIG SUPPORTER and friend Governor Spitzer ,Who was caught today in a prostitution ring .
Like Obama always say "same old same old .. thats why you cant send the same cast and characters back to Washington and expect a different result".

Carolyn   March 10th, 2008 6:34 pm ET

Folks,

Clinton does not think that Obama can be President – hence her 3AM ad. Of course, she thinks that he would make a good Vice President??? Duh.... someone needs to remind the Clintons (that includes Bill too) of the Constitution – the VP is second in line to the president and HAS to answer the phone at 3AM!!!

I am a bit suspicious here – Obama is ahead in the delegate count and in the popular vote, but with Clinton "suggesting" that he VP, is she trying to convince voters out there that she is ahead when she is not? It is a political move on her part and it is going to backfire. More proof to vote for McCain.

At the end of the day, Clinton NEEDS Obama's supporters, not vice-versa, but I suspect that this so called "dream-ticket" will turn Obama supporters away – they will either stay at home or vote for John McCain.

Kiki   March 10th, 2008 6:34 pm ET

Be careful with Obama. He just talks but did nothing useful or successful, ever. Just voted not to punish child predators or to help energy special interests in Illinois and accepted money and defended Rezko and pressed the wrong button when he had to vote on important staff that required he to take a position. That excepting when he voted 'present"

Nadeem Tahir   March 10th, 2008 6:34 pm ET

HILLARY IS THE PRESUMPTIVE NOMINEE BECAUSE EVERYONE KNOWS THAT THE SUPER DELEGATES WILL ALL VOTE FOR HER BECAUSE THEY ARE DEMOCRAT PARTY REGULARS AND SHE HAS SOLID SUPPORT OF THE DEMOCRATS AND THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY. WHEN THEY VOTE SHE WILL GO WAY OVER THE TOP. THAT IS WHY OBAMA IS TRYING TO CHANGE THE RULES AND SAYING THEY SHOULD VOTE FOR HIM. THAT IS BALONEY AND IT WILL NEVER HAPPEN. TO FORCE ANYONE TO VOTE A CERTIAN WAY IN ILLEGAL . OBAMA HAS BEEN GETTING THE VOTES OF PEOPLE IN WYOMING WHO VOTE REBUBLICAN AND THEY ARE SCARED TO SEE CLINTON AND THAT IS WHY THEY HAVE BEEN VOTING FOR HIM.

rowena   March 10th, 2008 6:33 pm ET

Obama is hypocrite just like Ophra. He's not willing to unite the party. He has his own agenda , his political ambition to be president . To hell with the american people who voted for him, he will drive America down with him.

JDB   March 10th, 2008 6:33 pm ET

Maybe she should offer the VP slot to McCain as long as she's at it. She's already endorsed him repeatedly. She clearly is no Democrat.

Joanna   March 10th, 2008 6:33 pm ET

Can anyone calculate the voters state by state? I do think Hillary won more voters but less delegates now. Because in the big state, a pledged delegate represents more voters than in the small state. And in the primary, a pledged delegate represents more voters than in the caucuse.

Arthur-Texas   March 10th, 2008 6:33 pm ET

Why is cnn'c Candy Crowley interjecting her personal opinion in the Clinton-Obama ticket? I thought news correspondents were just to report the news and not make personal comments about it.
That is wrong, and that is why I have swiitched to Fox news.
Hillary does not need Obama on her ticket to win in november.
She can go toe to toe with Mccain on the matter of national defense.
She would have to take valuable time to train Obama fix all of our countries problems and that would just drag Hillary down.

Tito   March 10th, 2008 6:32 pm ET

Only part that Hillary and Bill can play good and make it believable is on the Jerry Springer Show!

EFM   March 10th, 2008 6:32 pm ET

Obama is a Johnny-come-lately who would be lucky to get the VP spot. He should appreciate the offer, get some experience, and run again in eight years.

alh   March 10th, 2008 6:32 pm ET

lol...Mr. Winey-pants Obama! "Waaaa...I don't want to the second place ribbon,.... I wanna be first, I wanna be first" . Well then, earn it.....build up experience under Senator Clinton and then run for President in 4 or 8 years. OPen your eyes people...he is a politician just like the rest of them. In fact, he's even better than the rest of them because he makes you actually 'BELIEVE" what he's saying. lol What a joke. The idea of him running this country makes me want to move to England or somewhere! Another 9-11 is bound to happen if he is Commander in Chief.....our enemies will laugh us off the map, and no lofty, "hope" filled Obama SPEECH will change that fate. An Obama presidency is horrifying!

She didn't say WHO would be VP   March 10th, 2008 6:32 pm ET

Maybe Hillary's leaving the option open that SHE'd be VP. Whoever's on top of the ticket will need Democratic supporters from the "other side", and really there's about equal supporters on both sides. So, we'll need each other in the end.

James   March 10th, 2008 6:32 pm ET

Ah, I can finally see the hidden wisdom of this line of argument: the way to get the nomination is to use Obama's delegates....

By that same line of reasoning the Patriots could have beaten the Giants, if the Giants would have given them some of their points.

Hillary, this is the way it works: get the votes, then you get to pick the veep. Or maybe you are more like Huckabee: into miracles instead of math. At least Huckabee never offered to have McCain be his veep.

Hallie   March 10th, 2008 6:31 pm ET

Clinton – Obama? Hahahaha yea right, who wants a phenomenon like Obama when you can get Bill Clinton as VP! Or someone like Wesley Clark. Old yes, but fully and loyally in the pocket of the Clintons! Charisma? No way anyone can have a bigger personality than Bill or Hill. Youth? Pshhh, who needs youth when you have EXPERIENCE! I mean, who cares if the Clintons were corrupt and secretive, they fought and beat those Republicans to a pulp! And after 8 miserable years of infighting and partisanship and getting absolutely nothing done, 8 more years of infighting and partisanship is exactly what we need because this time it's with the Clintons! YES. Fresh face? Change? Who needs change my dears when we have the Clintons? Can't you hear the choirs singing, the heavens parting...the only change we need is to boot the Bushes out and go back in time to the 1990s! Because the Clintons equal gods and Hillary Clinton equals feminist goddess and it is her right as a woman scorned and derided by all of those horrible people to be President of this great country. If she must fight to the Convention, she only proves to be what we love most about her – she is a fighter! She will FIGHT John McCain, the 71 year old man, and DESTROY him.

Jason Smith   March 10th, 2008 6:31 pm ET

I think he needs to "Denounce and Reject" Her suggestions of a combined ticket!

This is just another prime example of pitiful tactics from Billary Clinton.

She/He will stop at nothing...to get what they want. They will step on any and everyone to obtain more power.

I truly hope people will see it for what it is. She is losing and is now ACTIVELY making efforts to destroy a party that has no choice but to deny her what she seeks. The people have spoken and she is losing.

Stay tuned for more dirt from the Billary Coalition!

Jason Smith
Rochester Hills, MI

Patrick, NYC   March 10th, 2008 6:31 pm ET

The idea of the #2 offering the Frontrunner the #2 position is laughable... That only shows one thing: desperation.

caywen   March 10th, 2008 6:31 pm ET

I think it's an ok strategy that isn't very underhanded. I also think it lacks inspiration and is not very well thought through. It will fail miserably. Democrats are tired and are increasingly willing to extend Obama's lead. And if Hillary pulls out some underhanded delegate snarfing, say hello to President McCain.

RW   March 10th, 2008 6:31 pm ET

Oh yea... Ron Paul thinks its a good idea and he is going to consider that!!!

Amused, Las Vegas   March 10th, 2008 6:31 pm ET

Jude March 10th, 2008 6:25 pm ET

"To all the folks who claim Red won't go Blue…stop your stupid analysis"

From the item on Rove: 'At one point during the speech, Rove reportedly lashed out at some of the students, saying, "You got a chance to ask your questions later and make your stupid statements, let me make mine." '

It seems Rove wants to make his own 'stupid statements' first.

Similarly, you want to make your own 'stupid analysis' and not hear anyone else's.

How Rovian of you.

David   March 10th, 2008 6:30 pm ET

She would be the only one who would benefit. She is trying to scam the voters into thinking that if they vote for her, they will also get Obama as her VP. First, he isn't interested in being her VP. Second, there is no guarantee she would even do it. Third, why would he be interested when he leads her in states won, popular vote, as well as the delegate vote. She should be on her knees begging him to ask her to be his VP. It will be the only way she can get back into the White House unless she can pull off a steal in Florida and Michigan. Isn't it amazing how Florida keeps screwing up the elections? Its time they learned a lesson about trying to bend the rules to their will.

jaymzz   March 10th, 2008 6:30 pm ET

can 1 really benefit from stupidity the hillary's campaign is showing? 1 day they call obama an inexperienced dreamer, next they offer him a vp spot? r they really as delusional as they successfully present themselves 2 b or simply plain retarded?

Goodheart   March 10th, 2008 6:30 pm ET

No, the Democratic Party benefits because with both of them on the ticket, as Bill Clinton said, they would be unstoppable. Their is no way McCain has a chance if all of those who voted for both Democratic candidates turn up at the polls in November.

This is key. Despite Obama's campaign talk about all the new voters he's brought in, recent polls show he would lose many white middle aged males who will defect to McCain. It's only smart to have them both on the ticket. Of course, Hillary benefits.

Observer   March 10th, 2008 6:30 pm ET

Look at all the comments.. CNN cannot post enough of comments ridiculing Hillary..

Obama comes across as an egnomaniac..

Obviosuly he is not prepared.. he could have been gracious and deflected responding to this ... who is playing dirty now???

DKM   March 10th, 2008 6:30 pm ET

Either Hilliary is out of touch with reality (like we need more of those) or she is really arrogant to be talking about a VP slot for Obama when he hasn't been consulted on or approved of such a proposal, AND he is the one in lead. Anyway, I am sure her tactic is a bait and switch. (Can Bill be VP?) If Obama suggests putting her on his VP ticket, I will be incredibly disappointed. Hilliary needs to show integrity and campaign with honesty. So many different Hilliary's to choose from...

Peter   March 10th, 2008 6:30 pm ET

Clinton supporters need to ask themselves what possible reason the Clintons have for this concerted effort. Clearly there is no benefit to declaring a running mate at this juncture. They are trying to steal Obama's moment simply becasue they failed to destroy it.

Its really like something out of a movie, where the hero has been beaten by some villain who suddenly changes tone and offers respite and some reward of personal gain if he will only give up fighting the good fight.

Oh wait, am I allowed to call Hillary a villain? I don't want to make her cry or anything...

jkk   March 10th, 2008 6:30 pm ET

Wake up Hillary, not gonna happen. Obama will be the nominee and if you want to be part of the train, you better hang on to Obama's tail coat. Or better still, get out of the race if you are too shamed to acknowledge the change that's about to sweep across the country.

Joseph, LA, CA   March 10th, 2008 6:29 pm ET

It is at moments like this that we can measure the true character behind people.

If Mr. Obama's goal were to unite the nation, he has to unite his party first. By refusing the suggestion, he is telling the voters, "Choose Me, or Else!" He could have simply said that it is a consideration given how close the voting has been.

Mr. Obama forgets he has no mandate. His lead in both the delegate count and the popular vote is slim to say the least. He must show he can unite the party.

And by claiming he is an agent of change, but when Florida and Michigan comes up, his steadfast insistence of "Playing by the Rules" seems odd. If he wanted to play by the rules, that's Washington without any change. And if he wanted to play by the rules, his argument that the Super Delegates vote the same way as the pledged delegates is nonsense.

It does not take a deep thinker to sort these facts out. Does Mr. Obama think we are delusional?

Carole in Canada   March 10th, 2008 6:29 pm ET

FYI PER USA ELECTION POLLS...
Popular Vote

* Clinton Leads by 245,884

Laura Long   March 10th, 2008 6:28 pm ET

Mission Accomplished Deja Vu
This talk by the Clintons begs the question: Does our country need four more years of a leader so detached from reality? The fight for the nomination is not over, the mission is not accomplished and all of Bush's banners and Bill's words will not change that.

Angela   March 10th, 2008 6:28 pm ET

TEXASDEM – I agree – Biden would be a great VP – Evan Bayh has been mentioned as well –

Obama supporters are awful

mimi de la cruz for OBAMA   March 10th, 2008 6:28 pm ET

Senator Obama is beating both Clintons and now they want him to take second place on ticket.Do they have some information we don't about Barack hitting his head on a wall or something. To call these two disingenuous is to insult all the disingenuous people of the world.

PD from CA   March 10th, 2008 6:28 pm ET

Is this woman capable of running a campaign that isn't sleazy and underhanded? Is this the kind of President she'd be? Of course it is.

Liz T   March 10th, 2008 6:28 pm ET

Hillary just looks pathetic, inappropriate and increasingly desperate with this ploy. There was a time I would have been happy to see them both on the ticket. Now I don't even want her as VP.

Obama-Edwards08!!

Time 4 Action   March 10th, 2008 6:28 pm ET

Obama
most states
most delegates
most popular votes

Obama – Next President of the United States of America

B. Smart   March 10th, 2008 6:26 pm ET

. . .Wyoming sure didn't fall for it. Hillary Clinton is a con Artist extraordinaire. She starts talking nonsense when she's about to wander into states that
she thinks consists of less educated people to whom she can pander her
double speaking lies and distortions. At this point you figure that everyone has caught on to her by now. But she figures that she is
about to speak to the voting segment that doesn't know that two plus
two equals four(NAFTA). Since when does the loser tell the winner where he is going to
be on the ticket?

OBAMA /KENNEDY 08.

Franky   March 10th, 2008 6:26 pm ET

To be honest, I think is too early to talk about it. Who knows, maybe in a couple of months from now it'll probably be different. But I think in some sense is just a way for the Democrats to "re-fuel" their engines......so far, they haven't stopped since....

JoJo   March 10th, 2008 6:26 pm ET

Obama didn't sell out the voters in MI and FL. Their state did. The man of integrity was and is just following the rules. I guess the solutions Clinton speaks of is changing the rules so that it fits you. Who cares about the message that this send to our children. If you look at the majority of primary elections, half the country doesn't get a chance to vote anyway. Even Clinton thought this would be over after super Tuesday...that's why she didn't start "caring" about MI and FL until she realized she needed them. Typical Clinton tactic, you're only valuable when she can get something from you.

Bill   March 10th, 2008 6:26 pm ET

I think the media is making more of this than there actually is. This is not an new subject and I have not seen anywhere were Clinton has said Obama should be her VP, other than people would like to be able to vote for both of them. She is still in this race and of course has every right to speculate. I see no harm here, only the media and bloggers blowing this out of porportion to create negative news for Clinton.

I find it funny how the media reports that Obama leads the popular vote, when that is not true.

Obama over reaction to this story makes him look arrogant, with a swollen head.

Charles   March 10th, 2008 6:26 pm ET

This is just stupid. Not only has she decided that since Iowa has decided for the rest of the states and that all of the states that went for Obama doesn't matter, she has now decided to declare herself the winner and try to make herself look good by offering the VP position to Obama. Since there seems to be a gigantic disconnect with Clinton and the rest of the Democratic voters we should recap the facts! Obama is winning the popular vote! Obama is winning the most states! Obama has more delegates! Not only does she think that super delegates can over rule the voters, she has decided that she can over rule the voters and the super delegates. This is the lowest of lows and we don't need that kind of politics! We need change! Not the kind of change that shut down the government twice when Bill Clinton was President! Dont get me wrong I have always defended Bill Clinton but that has nothing to do with his wife. The biggest reason I don't like her is because I believe that PACs and lobbyist have corrupted our government and she takes money from the very same people that are charging us $4 for a gallon of gas while Obama doesn't!

Billary Huckabee   March 10th, 2008 6:26 pm ET

Billary, Please!!! He would never lower himself to be on a ticket with you. This is not change, this is needing a "food tester" for eight years!!! To challenge "John I need a Mc Cain" on Iraq and foreign policy...someone like Joe Biden or Chris Dodd would be perfect or one of the many respected "Women Governors" who is not tied to every scandel ot the 90's. Billary is only attempting to tear down the party so in 4 years if the Dems lose, she can say "I told you so". But, she doesn't realize that in 4 years...no one will vote for her again, except the delusional Billary Huckabee supporters!!!

By June 6th, Billary and the rest of the Clintons will be done...two speeches at the Dem convention and back to New York to carpet bag!!!

Alice   March 10th, 2008 6:26 pm ET

Maybe Obama should run Hillary's "generous" offer by Al Gore, who's been there, done that . . . . .

Xyndau   March 10th, 2008 6:26 pm ET

Ok, Hillary did her part to try and unify the party, now she can get really tough on Obama. He had his chance, and cannot whine when Hillary get tough on him in the coming weeks.

yemiray   March 10th, 2008 6:26 pm ET

Alan J. unfortunately its neither the media nor an American idol issue..its the American people that has spoken and they prefer Obama as the president. Are you reading the election results upside down?

---
There are many other more qualified VP potentials out there. Obama isn't qualified for either slot on the ticket. Just because Obama has hit a nerve with the public doesn't make him qualified to lead the free world. This ain't American Idol, and I wish the media would stop treating it that way

rk   March 10th, 2008 6:26 pm ET

I thought that OBAMA was all for bringing the party together bring people together. I thought he was all about reaching out for the best of the party. Again all talk and no substance.

The only thing this shows is that he has no desire to do what is best for the party and lacks the eperience to know better!!!!.

Carrie Pa   March 10th, 2008 6:26 pm ET

This is a Clinton tactic to get votes from Obama supporters and undecided voters. It doesn't work on me. My vote will go for Obama.

LC   March 10th, 2008 6:25 pm ET

Are the Clintons making these suggestions in PA, or do they just think

those in Mississippi are stupid enough to fall for this craziness?

(It smells like more racism to me, or is that just desperation?)

Steen   March 10th, 2008 6:25 pm ET

Why are we even having elections in states that Clinton's campaign thinks are unimportant?

Richard   March 10th, 2008 6:25 pm ET

The Clintons want so badly to get back in the White House! She would never consider Obama and is willing to lie through her teeth about it.

citizen_c   March 10th, 2008 6:25 pm ET

There is another myth being propigated by the Clinton campaign ... that a Democratic Presidency is inevitable.

With Clinton on the ticket, the Republican base would be energized in ways that popping a giat D-cell on McCain's back would not do. She would bring something to the White House that the American people are sick and tired of dealing with ... baggage.

I'm surprised CNN made no mention of Clinton in their Spitzer article. After all, he is a big supporter of hers. Just goes to show, with friends like that ...

Quinn   March 10th, 2008 6:25 pm ET

Hillary is a master manipulator. Here is yet another example of how she wants people to think that SHE not Obama is the presumptive nominee.

The thing I don't like most about Hillary is the sense of entitlement she has about the winning the presidency. Her "35 years of experience" is a crock to everyone (except her supporters). If you thought George W. Bush was arrogant, you ain't seen nothing yet.

Obama represents the people in America who believe that the government is owned by the people...not the other way around.

Hillary should stick to letting SNL and Jon Stewart make her case for her. She is just a mess right now.

Jude   March 10th, 2008 6:25 pm ET

To all the folks who claim Red won't go Blue...stop your stupid analysis....Give people the vote before putting it in the bag. Obviously the Blue will stay blue so all those who voted blue will vote Obama. At least he has a greater shot of getting some of the other Red ones...Hillary has no shot at all....Period!!!

JAC465   March 10th, 2008 6:25 pm ET

Desperate times call for very, very un-presidential, win at all cost desperate measures. I wish Barack went negative but he's too good for that. What else will Hillary come up with sense she can't come up with the big W (win).

When she loses a state she says its okay we split the delegates but when she wins one even though the result is the same she takes it for all it's worth and makes a big deal about it

Should she be fighting for all delegates instead of cherry picking states? But then again she is fighting for two states that didn't count to begin with. I wonder would she even care if she was winning????

maynard   March 10th, 2008 6:25 pm ET

hillary is a loser.the whole clinton team are losers.hillary might have don,t a lot better if she did,nt use the mud slinging techniques that
she and bill are using and have used.It would have helped out to if the last name was anything but clinton.

if i were hillary i would stop and look at my political career and do some serious thinking . She might be cutting her own throat witn the help of bill.

from Boston   March 10th, 2008 6:25 pm ET

I don't recall Hillary ever saying that she would be in the first position with Barack being the VP. For all the comments out there, unless it came directly from the candidate explicitly saying this, then everything you and the pundits say is just your opinion. Stop twisting things around. I believe Bill and Hillary just echoed what people out there said that it would be a dream ticket.

Wayne   March 10th, 2008 6:24 pm ET

Obama's arrogance is getting more than a bit annoying! First he says he won't run for president again if he doesn't win this time, now its how he won't even consider being vice president. It's he's way or no way (an attitude we've had in the White House for 8 years now already). I begin to see why so many Hillary supporters are saying they would vote for McCain rather than see this arrogant baby in control of the country.

Hank   March 10th, 2008 6:24 pm ET

WHEN will Hillary stop endorsing McCain? No Republican would ever endorse a Democrat under similar circumstances. With a candidat