<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama camp: Clinton won&#039;t compete in battlegrounds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/</link>
	<description>All politics, all the time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:07:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris In California</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716893</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris In California</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716893</guid>
		<description>Oops - I thought this was Jack&#039;s blog...lol

Anyway, I still feel the same. I do not think Hillary has waved a &quot;white flag&quot; at all. I think she will go on to win the nomination and the presidency and that she will serve the people well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops &#8211; I thought this was Jack's blog...lol</p>
<p>Anyway, I still feel the same. I do not think Hillary has waved a "white flag" at all. I think she will go on to win the nomination and the presidency and that she will serve the people well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diamond</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716887</link>
		<dc:creator>Diamond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716887</guid>
		<description>Hillary Clinton pursues a falwed strategy that has failed Democrats for years. This woman has ZERO creativity.

You cannot win the prewsidency by winning 5 big states. Do&#039;t be deluded. EVERY SINGLE SURVEY OUT THERE shows Obama doing better against McCain - even in New York. 

This woman is unelectable. Her negatives are too high.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary Clinton pursues a falwed strategy that has failed Democrats for years. This woman has ZERO creativity.</p>
<p>You cannot win the prewsidency by winning 5 big states. Do't be deluded. EVERY SINGLE SURVEY OUT THERE shows Obama doing better against McCain &#8211; even in New York. </p>
<p>This woman is unelectable. Her negatives are too high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HUGH BOYLE</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716882</link>
		<dc:creator>HUGH BOYLE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716882</guid>
		<description>IF SHE CANT HAVE IT HER WAY (CLINTON), WHY SHOULD SHE TRY.  HOW IS SHE GOING TO TELLTHE PEOPLE OF NO CAROLINA THAT THERE STATE DOESN&#039;T MATTER.  IN MY OPION SHE DOESN&#039;T MATTER.   HUGHIE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IF SHE CANT HAVE IT HER WAY (CLINTON), WHY SHOULD SHE TRY.  HOW IS SHE GOING TO TELLTHE PEOPLE OF NO CAROLINA THAT THERE STATE DOESN'T MATTER.  IN MY OPION SHE DOESN'T MATTER.   HUGHIE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716880</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716880</guid>
		<description>Obama has not been able to prove himself in the states where it counts.  There is no question he is the candidate of the Black People. There is a question as to his standing with the majority.  I for one will not vote for someone just because he is black nor would I vote for someone just because he is white.  I will however vote for someone because he is a member of my group - A Naval Aviator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama has not been able to prove himself in the states where it counts.  There is no question he is the candidate of the Black People. There is a question as to his standing with the majority.  I for one will not vote for someone just because he is black nor would I vote for someone just because he is white.  I will however vote for someone because he is a member of my group &#8211; A Naval Aviator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthur</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716879</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716879</guid>
		<description>By throwing &quot;the kitchen sink&quot; at Obama prior to the Texas-Ohio primaries Hillary proved what many suspected about her - she will do anything to win.  She gave the Republicans ammo to fight Obama with in the general election in November, were he to be the nominee.  I&#039;ve never seen anyone go to those lengths in other internal party elections in Ireland or the UK.  It is as if she was saying to the Democrats &quot;If I&#039;m not going to be the nominee then I&#039;ll make sure you lose.&quot;  I was not committed either way before that stunt but now, if she wins the presidency, it will cast a long shadow on politics for a long time.  Bizarrely its almost exactly as Obama said in the beginning - the politics of fear vs a new hope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By throwing "the kitchen sink" at Obama prior to the Texas-Ohio primaries Hillary proved what many suspected about her &#8211; she will do anything to win.  She gave the Republicans ammo to fight Obama with in the general election in November, were he to be the nominee.  I've never seen anyone go to those lengths in other internal party elections in Ireland or the UK.  It is as if she was saying to the Democrats "If I'm not going to be the nominee then I'll make sure you lose."  I was not committed either way before that stunt but now, if she wins the presidency, it will cast a long shadow on politics for a long time.  Bizarrely its almost exactly as Obama said in the beginning &#8211; the politics of fear vs a new hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yakoto</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716878</link>
		<dc:creator>Yakoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716878</guid>
		<description>Yes, given the recent sharp negative, foul and defeatist remarks and utterances of Mrs Hillary Clinton and her campaign team, Sen Clinton would n&#039;t  be able to compete meaningfully in forth coming battlegrounds.

Instead, Hillary Clinton should start preparing her acceptance speech to concede defeat for the Democratic nomination  compaing sooner than later.

Barak Obama, all the way!
Obama go on, foward ever!
Obama winning ways!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, given the recent sharp negative, foul and defeatist remarks and utterances of Mrs Hillary Clinton and her campaign team, Sen Clinton would n't  be able to compete meaningfully in forth coming battlegrounds.</p>
<p>Instead, Hillary Clinton should start preparing her acceptance speech to concede defeat for the Democratic nomination  compaing sooner than later.</p>
<p>Barak Obama, all the way!<br />
Obama go on, foward ever!<br />
Obama winning ways!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter in Canada</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716877</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter in Canada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716877</guid>
		<description>I am beggining to believe all this campaigning is just &quot;smoke and mirrors&quot; at this point.
Hillary&#039;s strategy is becoming incredibly clear, it is referred to as &quot;the NUCLEAR OPTION&quot;.
If you cannot win (and she can&#039;t) then you hold the Democratic Party hostage until you get the nomination or you will destroy them or any chance of a presidential win for ANYBODY Democratic.
This shows her true character.  Is this waht America wants for &quot;Commander in Chief&quot; ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am beggining to believe all this campaigning is just "smoke and mirrors" at this point.<br />
Hillary's strategy is becoming incredibly clear, it is referred to as "the NUCLEAR OPTION".<br />
If you cannot win (and she can't) then you hold the Democratic Party hostage until you get the nomination or you will destroy them or any chance of a presidential win for ANYBODY Democratic.<br />
This shows her true character.  Is this waht America wants for "Commander in Chief" ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AngryinMN</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716873</link>
		<dc:creator>AngryinMN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716873</guid>
		<description>I almost forgot: How about path to Washington DC goes through Washington State?

Obama 08

Anyone but Hillary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I almost forgot: How about path to Washington DC goes through Washington State?</p>
<p>Obama 08</p>
<p>Anyone but Hillary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joanna</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716871</link>
		<dc:creator>joanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716871</guid>
		<description>What would this guy do if he did not have Hillary to kick around?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What would this guy do if he did not have Hillary to kick around?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716869</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716869</guid>
		<description>The lead that Obama has is too big for Clinton to make up. She might win PA but Obama will win NC and then we are back to where we started. At the end of the process, I think Obama will maintain over a hundred delegate lead and the Super Delegates will flock to him and bring this fight to a close</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lead that Obama has is too big for Clinton to make up. She might win PA but Obama will win NC and then we are back to where we started. At the end of the process, I think Obama will maintain over a hundred delegate lead and the Super Delegates will flock to him and bring this fight to a close</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716867</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716867</guid>
		<description>Huckabee has as much claim on the Republican nomination as Hillary has on the Democratic one. After all, according to the Clinton campaign logic, McCain won CA, NY, NJ, MA all states that Republicans lose in the general, while Huckabee won the South and more self-identified Republicans in SC and FL. So if we are to ignore delegates, states won and vote totals and all that matters is selective states that you are &quot;supposed&quot; to win then I guess Mike Huckabee is preparing for his nomination. If delegates and votes don&#039;t matter in who should be nominated, what would prevent such future &quot;moral&quot; claims to nominations, no matter how far behind candidates are? The Clinton campaigns argument is flimsy considering if it were applied to the Republican race that that would mean Huckabee has as equal a claim to be nominated as Hillary does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huckabee has as much claim on the Republican nomination as Hillary has on the Democratic one. After all, according to the Clinton campaign logic, McCain won CA, NY, NJ, MA all states that Republicans lose in the general, while Huckabee won the South and more self-identified Republicans in SC and FL. So if we are to ignore delegates, states won and vote totals and all that matters is selective states that you are "supposed" to win then I guess Mike Huckabee is preparing for his nomination. If delegates and votes don't matter in who should be nominated, what would prevent such future "moral" claims to nominations, no matter how far behind candidates are? The Clinton campaigns argument is flimsy considering if it were applied to the Republican race that that would mean Huckabee has as equal a claim to be nominated as Hillary does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IF, Portugal, Lisbon</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716868</link>
		<dc:creator>IF, Portugal, Lisbon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716868</guid>
		<description>The general election won&#039;t be about Pensylvania or Ohio. Her margin in Texas was negligeble to start with and has all but vanished this last day. The ganeral election will be, as the nominee elections, about each of the United States (if the United part survives Clinton&#039;s campaign). So, how can Clinton win the general election if she doesn&#039;t seem to be winning the nominee &quot;contest&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The general election won't be about Pensylvania or Ohio. Her margin in Texas was negligeble to start with and has all but vanished this last day. The ganeral election will be, as the nominee elections, about each of the United States (if the United part survives Clinton's campaign). So, how can Clinton win the general election if she doesn't seem to be winning the nominee "contest"?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: morrow</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716864</link>
		<dc:creator>morrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716864</guid>
		<description>OK - so who&#039;s the strongest candidate in the Nov. general election?  Isn&#039;t Clinton is way ahead in that statistic?   My count is this:

263 - Electoral college votes of states Clinton has won
193 - Electoral college votes of states Obama has won

The electoral votes from states Clinton has already won, plus Pennsylvania (or one or two of the other states yet to vote), would put her over the 270 required to elect a president.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK &#8211; so who's the strongest candidate in the Nov. general election?  Isn't Clinton is way ahead in that statistic?   My count is this:</p>
<p>263 &#8211; Electoral college votes of states Clinton has won<br />
193 &#8211; Electoral college votes of states Obama has won</p>
<p>The electoral votes from states Clinton has already won, plus Pennsylvania (or one or two of the other states yet to vote), would put her over the 270 required to elect a president.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoBama</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716861</link>
		<dc:creator>NoBama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716861</guid>
		<description>Obama is Desperate!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is Desperate!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716859</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716859</guid>
		<description>In analysis Obama won a lot of caucus states that democrates will not win, and the so called battleground states he won are marginal at best.  I think Clinton makes a powerful argument that she won the major states, and the fact that neither will have enough delegates to win, well the bottom line question, is experience to lead our nation forward.  I have a dream is different than I know how to lead.
This election should not be about race or gender, but, in reality it is.
Obama has the advantage being a male.  It doesn&#039;t matter what race he is, the good old boy club makes it difficult for a woman to advance.
I wonder why reporters don&#039;t press the question to afro-american voters why are you voting for him at a 70% clip, I think the bottom line it because of race.  And when women are asked the same question, well it is about gender.  But, really, isn&#039;t the bottom line question about who can best solve our problems, deal with Washington, because, lobbyist will be a player no matter what Obama says, or what Clinton is accused of the lobbyist friend.  It always boils down to leadership skills and how make government work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In analysis Obama won a lot of caucus states that democrates will not win, and the so called battleground states he won are marginal at best.  I think Clinton makes a powerful argument that she won the major states, and the fact that neither will have enough delegates to win, well the bottom line question, is experience to lead our nation forward.  I have a dream is different than I know how to lead.<br />
This election should not be about race or gender, but, in reality it is.<br />
Obama has the advantage being a male.  It doesn't matter what race he is, the good old boy club makes it difficult for a woman to advance.<br />
I wonder why reporters don't press the question to afro-american voters why are you voting for him at a 70% clip, I think the bottom line it because of race.  And when women are asked the same question, well it is about gender.  But, really, isn't the bottom line question about who can best solve our problems, deal with Washington, because, lobbyist will be a player no matter what Obama says, or what Clinton is accused of the lobbyist friend.  It always boils down to leadership skills and how make government work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: v.a.</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716858</link>
		<dc:creator>v.a.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716858</guid>
		<description>OBAMA PLAYED THE RACE CARD BEFORE SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTIONS TO GET VOTES FROM AFRICAN  AMERICANS  AND AT THE SAME TIME HIS SUPPORTERS TRIED TO SHOW THAT THE CLINTONS WERE RACIAL AND NOW IT IS BACKFIRING !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OBAMA PLAYED THE RACE CARD BEFORE SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTIONS TO GET VOTES FROM AFRICAN  AMERICANS  AND AT THE SAME TIME HIS SUPPORTERS TRIED TO SHOW THAT THE CLINTONS WERE RACIAL AND NOW IT IS BACKFIRING !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716857</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716857</guid>
		<description>The same way Senator Clinton neglects the small states she lost in primaries and caucuses, the same way the small states will neglect her if she becomes the nominee. Large states are not the only states that make up America, it&#039;s all of them.

Her inconsideration of  votes in the states she lost and recent polarized tatics could come back to hunt her if she&#039;s not carefull.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The same way Senator Clinton neglects the small states she lost in primaries and caucuses, the same way the small states will neglect her if she becomes the nominee. Large states are not the only states that make up America, it's all of them.</p>
<p>Her inconsideration of  votes in the states she lost and recent polarized tatics could come back to hunt her if she's not carefull.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George from Minneapolis</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716853</link>
		<dc:creator>George from Minneapolis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716853</guid>
		<description>The big states that Hillary has won will vote for ANY DEMOCRAT in the general election.  Barney could run as a democrat and he would win Cal, Ny, Nj etc.

So, Hillary saying she &quot;won the big states&quot; does not matter in the general election because a democrat is going to win them no matter who it is.  

Can Hillary say that she can win some of the states that Obama won in the general election or be competitive?  NO.  Democrats best chance in the general election is with Obama.  That is obvious for us intelligent people.  Who happen to be voting for Obama in droves.  Coincedence ???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The big states that Hillary has won will vote for ANY DEMOCRAT in the general election.  Barney could run as a democrat and he would win Cal, Ny, Nj etc.</p>
<p>So, Hillary saying she "won the big states" does not matter in the general election because a democrat is going to win them no matter who it is.  </p>
<p>Can Hillary say that she can win some of the states that Obama won in the general election or be competitive?  NO.  Democrats best chance in the general election is with Obama.  That is obvious for us intelligent people.  Who happen to be voting for Obama in droves.  Coincedence ???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris In California</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716852</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris In California</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716852</guid>
		<description>Jack - I think you are biased in favor of Barack Obama. Can you even come up with ONE sincere and honest probing question regarding Barack Obama. Your support for Barack Obama is obvious. I think your tactics are tabloid, not true journalism by any legitimate standard.

Having said that, I think Hillary Clinton will be our next President and I think she has all of the experience, skill, and dedication to this country to do the job well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack &#8211; I think you are biased in favor of Barack Obama. Can you even come up with ONE sincere and honest probing question regarding Barack Obama. Your support for Barack Obama is obvious. I think your tactics are tabloid, not true journalism by any legitimate standard.</p>
<p>Having said that, I think Hillary Clinton will be our next President and I think she has all of the experience, skill, and dedication to this country to do the job well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nevada for Obama</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716849</link>
		<dc:creator>Nevada for Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716849</guid>
		<description>Obama is running a 50 state presidential campaign and rightly believes that every state counts. Clinton runs a hit and run cherry pick campaign which is a loosing strategy. Obama has put the red states in play for the first time in many years. He has won 15 out of the last 17 contests, and yes including Texas!.

 Pensylvania is just another state like every other state, and Obama will do well there. Clinton is on the run, and kept drawing fire wall after fire wall. Pensylvania is the new fire wall. After pensylvania, her next fire wall is Puerorico. What a shame!!. 

CNN POST MY COMMENT FOR A CHANGE!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is running a 50 state presidential campaign and rightly believes that every state counts. Clinton runs a hit and run cherry pick campaign which is a loosing strategy. Obama has put the red states in play for the first time in many years. He has won 15 out of the last 17 contests, and yes including Texas!.</p>
<p> Pensylvania is just another state like every other state, and Obama will do well there. Clinton is on the run, and kept drawing fire wall after fire wall. Pensylvania is the new fire wall. After pensylvania, her next fire wall is Puerorico. What a shame!!. </p>
<p>CNN POST MY COMMENT FOR A CHANGE!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: horace from The Golden State</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716843</link>
		<dc:creator>horace from The Golden State</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716843</guid>
		<description>isn&#039;t it so nice to hear from the clinton campaign that all the voters in all the states that obama has won will be irrelevant in the general election.  i&#039;m sure that all those millions of voters who voted for obama will be happy to hear how the clinton campaign regards them.............meaningless!  nice spin hillary.  good judgement NOT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>isn't it so nice to hear from the clinton campaign that all the voters in all the states that obama has won will be irrelevant in the general election.  i'm sure that all those millions of voters who voted for obama will be happy to hear how the clinton campaign regards them.............meaningless!  nice spin hillary.  good judgement NOT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nevada for Obama</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716842</link>
		<dc:creator>Nevada for Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716842</guid>
		<description>Obama is running a 50 state presidential campaign and rightly believes that every state counts. Clinton runs a hit and run cherry pick campaign which is a loosing strategy. Obama has put the red states in play for the first time in many years. He has won 15 out of the last 17 contests, and yes including Texas!.

 Pensylvania is just another state like every other state, and Obama will do well there. Clinton is on the run, and kept drawing fire wall after fire wall. Pensylvania is the new fire wall. After pensylvania, her next fire wall is Puerorico. What a shame!!.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is running a 50 state presidential campaign and rightly believes that every state counts. Clinton runs a hit and run cherry pick campaign which is a loosing strategy. Obama has put the red states in play for the first time in many years. He has won 15 out of the last 17 contests, and yes including Texas!.</p>
<p> Pensylvania is just another state like every other state, and Obama will do well there. Clinton is on the run, and kept drawing fire wall after fire wall. Pensylvania is the new fire wall. After pensylvania, her next fire wall is Puerorico. What a shame!!.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trev</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716841</link>
		<dc:creator>Trev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716841</guid>
		<description>Clinton won&#039;t compete in battlegrounds?  Florida, Michigan, Ohio, PA, NJ?  Obama will give it his best shot in Idaho though.  

Look, it is true that Obama is stronger in WA, WI, VA and Maybe OR.  The.  Those states are important (Hillary never said they were not).  However, if you asked me which states I would like to win, it would be the ones with more electors in the general.  By not wanting to count Florida and Michigan, Obama is effectively waiving the white flag in those states.  No thanks!

Hillary 08</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clinton won't compete in battlegrounds?  Florida, Michigan, Ohio, PA, NJ?  Obama will give it his best shot in Idaho though.  </p>
<p>Look, it is true that Obama is stronger in WA, WI, VA and Maybe OR.  The.  Those states are important (Hillary never said they were not).  However, if you asked me which states I would like to win, it would be the ones with more electors in the general.  By not wanting to count Florida and Michigan, Obama is effectively waiving the white flag in those states.  No thanks!</p>
<p>Hillary 08</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MM</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716836</link>
		<dc:creator>MM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716836</guid>
		<description>Obama is only &quot;winning&quot; &quot;red&quot; states...and the race only counts Democrats...Republicans are 98% white (the other half of the race).  In November he will need to win &quot;blue&quot; states (which he can&#039;t) and he&#039;ll have to win over 50% of whites...which looks very unlikely.  He should have given serious thought to negotiating a VP slot to get more recognition, then run after Hillary&#039;s 2 terms.  The Dems have screwed up this perfect scenario that would have given them time, and both branches (Congress and Executive) of government to reverse the Reagan/Bushes era.  They don&#039;t have to move to the middle if they figure it out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is only "winning" "red" states...and the race only counts Democrats...Republicans are 98% white (the other half of the race).  In November he will need to win "blue" states (which he can't) and he'll have to win over 50% of whites...which looks very unlikely.  He should have given serious thought to negotiating a VP slot to get more recognition, then run after Hillary's 2 terms.  The Dems have screwed up this perfect scenario that would have given them time, and both branches (Congress and Executive) of government to reverse the Reagan/Bushes era.  They don't have to move to the middle if they figure it out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren P</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716833</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716833</guid>
		<description>Why do I get the feeling that if Hillary wins, she will claim ala Bush to be the President of the states that voted for her? I realize the importance of the big states, but it seems that she is willing to cast down all the other states just because they don&#039;t support her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do I get the feeling that if Hillary wins, she will claim ala Bush to be the President of the states that voted for her? I realize the importance of the big states, but it seems that she is willing to cast down all the other states just because they don't support her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: California Independent</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716829</link>
		<dc:creator>California Independent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716829</guid>
		<description>Obama thinks Clinton should beat him in red state North Carolina that is 21% AA?  Could someone please get him to shut up.

So far, Clinton has won 163 Democratic delegates to Obama&#039;s 82 for the GE.  The number of Clinton supporters who refuse to vote for Obama exceed the Obama supporters who won&#039;t vote for Clinton.  24% of Clinton supporters like McCain.  Obama is susceptible to McCain in 3 democratic states.

They can spin all they want.  Statistically they are the weakest candidate.

Oh yeah, good line.... North Carolina is more indicative of the GE result that Pennsylvania.  NC has 3 GE delegates to PN&#039;s 21.  Nice math Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama thinks Clinton should beat him in red state North Carolina that is 21% AA?  Could someone please get him to shut up.</p>
<p>So far, Clinton has won 163 Democratic delegates to Obama's 82 for the GE.  The number of Clinton supporters who refuse to vote for Obama exceed the Obama supporters who won't vote for Clinton.  24% of Clinton supporters like McCain.  Obama is susceptible to McCain in 3 democratic states.</p>
<p>They can spin all they want.  Statistically they are the weakest candidate.</p>
<p>Oh yeah, good line.... North Carolina is more indicative of the GE result that Pennsylvania.  NC has 3 GE delegates to PN's 21.  Nice math Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Candi</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716824</link>
		<dc:creator>Candi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716824</guid>
		<description>If the people of Pennsylvania is so studpid that they will let Hillary dictate how to cast their vote for her then you all are studpid. Hillary don&#039;t care about you people, don&#039;t you get it by now. People of any states to follow should not let that monster get on stage with her old fashion sense of direction and say vote for me because of my experience, foreign policy or whatever. Hillary is a fraud and there is something she left in the White House she can&#039;t find that is damaging to her and Bill and she needs to get back in there to remove it. Okay let her get back there and you people will be down the tube. You think she threw the kitchen sink at Obama she will stones  to the American People, because you put her were she wanted to be but not because she like you but because she like herself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the people of Pennsylvania is so studpid that they will let Hillary dictate how to cast their vote for her then you all are studpid. Hillary don't care about you people, don't you get it by now. People of any states to follow should not let that monster get on stage with her old fashion sense of direction and say vote for me because of my experience, foreign policy or whatever. Hillary is a fraud and there is something she left in the White House she can't find that is damaging to her and Bill and she needs to get back in there to remove it. Okay let her get back there and you people will be down the tube. You think she threw the kitchen sink at Obama she will stones  to the American People, because you put her were she wanted to be but not because she like you but because she like herself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JamesD</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716823</link>
		<dc:creator>JamesD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716823</guid>
		<description>Clinton spokesman asks how Obama can win the general election if he can&#039;t win PA? A better question should be, how can Hillary win the general election if she can&#039;t win the most primary delegates?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clinton spokesman asks how Obama can win the general election if he can't win PA? A better question should be, how can Hillary win the general election if she can't win the most primary delegates?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joan</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716822</link>
		<dc:creator>Joan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716822</guid>
		<description>As if Pennsylvania, Michigan, Florida and Ohio are not battleground states. 
If they continue to show resistance to revotes in Michigan and Florida be sure to lose in the GE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As if Pennsylvania, Michigan, Florida and Ohio are not battleground states.<br />
If they continue to show resistance to revotes in Michigan and Florida be sure to lose in the GE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer C.</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716818</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716818</guid>
		<description>With Obama in the general election this will not be an ordinary party line Democrat/Republican election.  My 68 year old Republican father, who has never voted Democratic, admires McCain but can&#039;t stop talking about Obama&#039;s vision for America.  My 66 year old Democratic mother voted for Obama saying, &quot;he is the only one speaking the truth&quot;.  I am a 41 year old , Republican, mother of two, former Catholic school teacher who hopes our country sees the gift in Obama.  He has integrity and courage and speaks frankly about our universal concerns.  We have a real leader in our midst and maybe we have forgotten what one looks like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Obama in the general election this will not be an ordinary party line Democrat/Republican election.  My 68 year old Republican father, who has never voted Democratic, admires McCain but can't stop talking about Obama's vision for America.  My 66 year old Democratic mother voted for Obama saying, "he is the only one speaking the truth".  I am a 41 year old , Republican, mother of two, former Catholic school teacher who hopes our country sees the gift in Obama.  He has integrity and courage and speaks frankly about our universal concerns.  We have a real leader in our midst and maybe we have forgotten what one looks like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: champ</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716815</link>
		<dc:creator>champ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716815</guid>
		<description>Why should the Clinton&#039;S&#039; campaign set the agenda and the media continue to buy into it? It&#039;s like getting to an Olympic and dictating what race should the race commissions deem important. OR, It’s like a football match, where the goal poles keep moving and moving. Hilary, you’ll be surprised we will win you on your own field!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why should the Clinton'S' campaign set the agenda and the media continue to buy into it? It's like getting to an Olympic and dictating what race should the race commissions deem important. OR, It’s like a football match, where the goal poles keep moving and moving. Hilary, you’ll be surprised we will win you on your own field!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ken</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716813</link>
		<dc:creator>ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716813</guid>
		<description>It is absolutely insane to think that Obama can&#039;t win the Democratic &quot;big&quot; states if he faces McCain in the general election.  They are Democratic states !  He will carry those states if Clinton is not in the picture.  Are American&#039;s that stupid to buy into Clinton&#039;s weak argument?  I cannot be the only smart American here.  Read carefully..... Except for Texas (Which Obama won as a whole) THE DEMOCRATIC BIG STATES WILL STAY SIMPLY THAT&gt; DEMOCRATIC ! REGARDLESS WHO IS THE NOMINEE.  Weak argument. Anyone who has half a brain would understand that.  You want to know the big difference between American&#039;s and the rest of the world ?  Americans love to be told what to think.  That&#039;s why they buy into every B.S that is pumped out my the Media.  Sorry CNN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is absolutely insane to think that Obama can't win the Democratic "big" states if he faces McCain in the general election.  They are Democratic states !  He will carry those states if Clinton is not in the picture.  Are American's that stupid to buy into Clinton's weak argument?  I cannot be the only smart American here.  Read carefully..... Except for Texas (Which Obama won as a whole) THE DEMOCRATIC BIG STATES WILL STAY SIMPLY THAT&gt; DEMOCRATIC ! REGARDLESS WHO IS THE NOMINEE.  Weak argument. Anyone who has half a brain would understand that.  You want to know the big difference between American's and the rest of the world ?  Americans love to be told what to think.  That's why they buy into every B.S that is pumped out my the Media.  Sorry CNN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Realistic</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716812</link>
		<dc:creator>Realistic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716812</guid>
		<description>Hillary is winning the states that ANY Democratic candidate would win anyhow, but she has no chance outside of those states.

By contrast, Obama will take not only the blue states but a lot of the red ones as well.

Hopefully, the Democratic leadership understands this and will be euthanizing the sad but lingering remains of the Clinton campaign soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary is winning the states that ANY Democratic candidate would win anyhow, but she has no chance outside of those states.</p>
<p>By contrast, Obama will take not only the blue states but a lot of the red ones as well.</p>
<p>Hopefully, the Democratic leadership understands this and will be euthanizing the sad but lingering remains of the Clinton campaign soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bakersfield</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716809</link>
		<dc:creator>bakersfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716809</guid>
		<description>why don&#039;t you let my posts thru
Can someone explain how caucus’s are a reflection of the peoples vote
Example
Texas
Popular vote Clinton 51%  caucus 44%
Popular vote obama 47%   caucus 56%
Plus only 41% of the precincs have been reported the others might have somehow come up missing
So tell me if I’m wrong but this tells me that caucus are not the will of the people of the state, it is the will of the few that are able to show up. 
me and other voters in california are voting for experience and i guantee i will vote for mccain if hillary is not the nominee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why don't you let my posts thru<br />
Can someone explain how caucus’s are a reflection of the peoples vote<br />
Example<br />
Texas<br />
Popular vote Clinton 51%  caucus 44%<br />
Popular vote obama 47%   caucus 56%<br />
Plus only 41% of the precincs have been reported the others might have somehow come up missing<br />
So tell me if I’m wrong but this tells me that caucus are not the will of the people of the state, it is the will of the few that are able to show up.<br />
me and other voters in california are voting for experience and i guantee i will vote for mccain if hillary is not the nominee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sameer</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716807</link>
		<dc:creator>Sameer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716807</guid>
		<description>More Obama stays in the race, more he is exposed. All those people who voted for him in the Super Tuesday, half of them will not vote now for him if the voting were to happen today. He has been exposed, he is not that goody goody as he sounded at the beginning, as a matter of fact he is very arrogant and devisive person. He is the reason the party is now so divided.

As Tom Brokaw said in an interview with the Canadian news channel, he is flying 35,000 ft above, it is time now he comes down to earth and face the reality. He can&#039;t go on to win the general election just by winning over 90% of black votes. Lets accept the fact, most of the states he won are red states and irrelevant in the general election because these states will go to the Republicans anyway.

Clinton is a fighter, througout this campaign she has been fighting tough against all odds and still standing hard on ground. Do we think Obama can handle the pressure she has been? I admire her for what she has done for the country, what has Obama done so far except criticizing Bill Clinton&#039;s legacy and talking empty talks? Bill Clinton was the best president we had in the recent history and Obama will never ever be able to reach his legacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More Obama stays in the race, more he is exposed. All those people who voted for him in the Super Tuesday, half of them will not vote now for him if the voting were to happen today. He has been exposed, he is not that goody goody as he sounded at the beginning, as a matter of fact he is very arrogant and devisive person. He is the reason the party is now so divided.</p>
<p>As Tom Brokaw said in an interview with the Canadian news channel, he is flying 35,000 ft above, it is time now he comes down to earth and face the reality. He can't go on to win the general election just by winning over 90% of black votes. Lets accept the fact, most of the states he won are red states and irrelevant in the general election because these states will go to the Republicans anyway.</p>
<p>Clinton is a fighter, througout this campaign she has been fighting tough against all odds and still standing hard on ground. Do we think Obama can handle the pressure she has been? I admire her for what she has done for the country, what has Obama done so far except criticizing Bill Clinton's legacy and talking empty talks? Bill Clinton was the best president we had in the recent history and Obama will never ever be able to reach his legacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D.Kimbro OHIO</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716805</link>
		<dc:creator>D.Kimbro OHIO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716805</guid>
		<description>I am truly interested to see what will happen if Clinton doesnt win in Pa. I guess she is shooting for another piric victory like the one in Texas. How can you continue to count that states as a win when you came away with less delegates.  She will not get the type of margin needed to solidify anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am truly interested to see what will happen if Clinton doesnt win in Pa. I guess she is shooting for another piric victory like the one in Texas. How can you continue to count that states as a win when you came away with less delegates.  She will not get the type of margin needed to solidify anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron, Las Vegas</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716803</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron, Las Vegas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716803</guid>
		<description>People forget there is a difference between a primary election and a general election. Just because you lose a primary election ia state does not mean you lose the general election there. This whole thing about winning big states is one big falsehood. Many of those will go to whomever the democratic nominee is. By stating all the states she has lost as not important, Hillary has set herself up for defeat. No one likes to be told that their state does not count or is not important. Remember they are running for president of the US, not just some of the big states.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People forget there is a difference between a primary election and a general election. Just because you lose a primary election ia state does not mean you lose the general election there. This whole thing about winning big states is one big falsehood. Many of those will go to whomever the democratic nominee is. By stating all the states she has lost as not important, Hillary has set herself up for defeat. No one likes to be told that their state does not count or is not important. Remember they are running for president of the US, not just some of the big states.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carlo</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716799</link>
		<dc:creator>carlo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716799</guid>
		<description>How is it that Clinton gets to tell us which states are the Key states?  I thought that the race was for the President of the United States, you know, that country with FIFTY states!  I&#039;m starting to wonder if the media is afraid of Hillary.  I know Obama&#039;s problem-poor thing-he&#039;s a gentleman.  Doesn&#039;t he know that you can&#039;t treat Hillary like a lady?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is it that Clinton gets to tell us which states are the Key states?  I thought that the race was for the President of the United States, you know, that country with FIFTY states!  I'm starting to wonder if the media is afraid of Hillary.  I know Obama's problem-poor thing-he's a gentleman.  Doesn't he know that you can't treat Hillary like a lady?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ga Mike</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716796</link>
		<dc:creator>Ga Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716796</guid>
		<description>The most populous states that Clinton is touting as victories are going to be states that Dems win anyway. Give me a break, this whole thing is a fairy tale. There is some truth to what the Obama camp is saying about the old strategies in Washington. 50 + 1 leads to the same gridlock that exists in Washington right now, a country and 2-party system divided by red/blue states and republican/democrat. This is exactly what Obama is trying to change. He has gone on record to say that one way to reach across the aisle is to consider Republicans as members of his cabinet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most populous states that Clinton is touting as victories are going to be states that Dems win anyway. Give me a break, this whole thing is a fairy tale. There is some truth to what the Obama camp is saying about the old strategies in Washington. 50 + 1 leads to the same gridlock that exists in Washington right now, a country and 2-party system divided by red/blue states and republican/democrat. This is exactly what Obama is trying to change. He has gone on record to say that one way to reach across the aisle is to consider Republicans as members of his cabinet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dwayne</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716791</link>
		<dc:creator>Dwayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716791</guid>
		<description>Clinton&#039;s Campaign continuously attempts to define the nomination process by their own criteria’s, seemingly oblivious to the fact that they are behind both in Pledge Delegates and the popular vote. Now it’s another attempt to define the fight for the nomination based on who wins the state of Pennsylvania.  For the Clinton Campaign wherever she stands to be victorious becomes the nomination defining state, this is just too absurd.  Were they not given the same rulebook as the Obama Campaign?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clinton's Campaign continuously attempts to define the nomination process by their own criteria’s, seemingly oblivious to the fact that they are behind both in Pledge Delegates and the popular vote. Now it’s another attempt to define the fight for the nomination based on who wins the state of Pennsylvania.  For the Clinton Campaign wherever she stands to be victorious becomes the nomination defining state, this is just too absurd.  Were they not given the same rulebook as the Obama Campaign?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716790</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716790</guid>
		<description>HILLARY and FERARRO 08 FIGHTERS FOR AMERICA YES WE CAN!
REAL SOLUTIONS FOR REAL AMERICANS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HILLARY and FERARRO 08 FIGHTERS FOR AMERICA YES WE CAN!<br />
REAL SOLUTIONS FOR REAL AMERICANS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom, Iowa</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716788</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom, Iowa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716788</guid>
		<description>Who wrote this article? It makes no sense. Three paragraphs in it mentions some named &quot;Plouffe.&quot; Who are they? Who do they represent? Someone needs to edit this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who wrote this article? It makes no sense. Three paragraphs in it mentions some named "Plouffe." Who are they? Who do they represent? Someone needs to edit this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TSR</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716787</link>
		<dc:creator>TSR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716787</guid>
		<description>Ridiculious is what i call her campaign,,,,,,,,John Mcsane will win Pennsylvania in the general election if the democrats elect Hillary and Bill to the party&#039;s nomination,also he&#039;ll probably win Ohio and Texas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ridiculious is what i call her campaign,,,,,,,,John Mcsane will win Pennsylvania in the general election if the democrats elect Hillary and Bill to the party's nomination,also he'll probably win Ohio and Texas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AngryinMN</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716777</link>
		<dc:creator>AngryinMN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716777</guid>
		<description>&quot;Pennsylvania...path to 1600 Pensssylvania&quot;???  Like it was 4 years ago with Kerry/Edwards ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Pennsylvania...path to 1600 Pensssylvania"???  Like it was 4 years ago with Kerry/Edwards ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom,des moines</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716776</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom,des moines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716776</guid>
		<description>People who support Obama should know 1 thing, and that is u need to win blue states, and not red states like AL,AK,GA,ID,KS,ND,UT,LA,NE,VA,WY and MS, as u know John McCain will win most if not all of the red states anyway. all I can say to Obama supporter,that is not 2 late to join the winning team and be part of the team that will beat John McCain in the gereral election. Go Hillary!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People who support Obama should know 1 thing, and that is u need to win blue states, and not red states like AL,AK,GA,ID,KS,ND,UT,LA,NE,VA,WY and MS, as u know John McCain will win most if not all of the red states anyway. all I can say to Obama supporter,that is not 2 late to join the winning team and be part of the team that will beat John McCain in the gereral election. Go Hillary!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716773</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716773</guid>
		<description>I am so tired of hearing the same old noise from Hilliary.  She couldn&#039;t win in November with all the Republican attack machine waiting patiently for her. So forget it Hilliary and aren&#039;t you tired of this losing battle you&#039;re fighting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am so tired of hearing the same old noise from Hilliary.  She couldn't win in November with all the Republican attack machine waiting patiently for her. So forget it Hilliary and aren't you tired of this losing battle you're fighting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TAR HEEL</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716769</link>
		<dc:creator>TAR HEEL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716769</guid>
		<description>just leave it to obama&#039;s campaign to point out that he is competing in a racially mixed state like he is himself ...what will he think of next to actually speak on the issues ..oh wait he does ....fact is obama doesnt have to do anything but coast statisically he only needs 47% of the last contests to win the nomination because he is so far ahead in the delegate count ..............

         ooooohhhh thats gotta hurt hillary geraldine and gloria steinem whats next will they protest that he should have given them a head start because they are women ......they will think of something stupid to say tommarrow just wait you&#039;ll see</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just leave it to obama's campaign to point out that he is competing in a racially mixed state like he is himself ...what will he think of next to actually speak on the issues ..oh wait he does ....fact is obama doesnt have to do anything but coast statisically he only needs 47% of the last contests to win the nomination because he is so far ahead in the delegate count ..............</p>
<p>         ooooohhhh thats gotta hurt hillary geraldine and gloria steinem whats next will they protest that he should have given them a head start because they are women ......they will think of something stupid to say tommarrow just wait you'll see</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716763</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716763</guid>
		<description>The Clinton campaign falsely portrays that if they win a big state in the primary that Obama cannot win that state in the general election. This position is flawed...The democrats will win CA, NY, NJ, MA and yes OH and PA with either of these canidates. This is mostly true with all of the states...Obama does bring into play the possibility to win states that have traditionaly voted republican and Hillary does not...this is an undisputed fact (republicans HATE Hillary)

All canidates try to spin their message to benefit them but Hillary Clinton does in a way that disrespects the american voter, treating us as if we are stupid. We should all be outraged over her behavior!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Clinton campaign falsely portrays that if they win a big state in the primary that Obama cannot win that state in the general election. This position is flawed...The democrats will win CA, NY, NJ, MA and yes OH and PA with either of these canidates. This is mostly true with all of the states...Obama does bring into play the possibility to win states that have traditionaly voted republican and Hillary does not...this is an undisputed fact (republicans HATE Hillary)</p>
<p>All canidates try to spin their message to benefit them but Hillary Clinton does in a way that disrespects the american voter, treating us as if we are stupid. We should all be outraged over her behavior!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charle/Amsterdam, Netherlands</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716761</link>
		<dc:creator>Charle/Amsterdam, Netherlands</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716761</guid>
		<description>and here I am thinking that the USA consisted of 50 states plus some far away regions like Puerto rico, Guam etc. From the Clinton point of view the USAc osists merely of a handful of bigger states like California, Florida, New York and Pennsylvania, provided she wins those states. Is Texas still a worthy state or has it lost its status afterthe full election results?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and here I am thinking that the USA consisted of 50 states plus some far away regions like Puerto rico, Guam etc. From the Clinton point of view the USAc osists merely of a handful of bigger states like California, Florida, New York and Pennsylvania, provided she wins those states. Is Texas still a worthy state or has it lost its status afterthe full election results?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GAURAV</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716760</link>
		<dc:creator>GAURAV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/obama-camp-clinton-wont-compete-in-battlegrounds/#comment-716760</guid>
		<description>CLINTON SHOULD GIVE UP, SHE CANNOT BE THE NOMINEE, SHE NEVER LEARNED TO REPRESENT THE WHOLE COUNTRY. OBAMA MAY NOT HAVE WON SOME BIG STATES BUT HE DID NOT GET BLOWN OUT EITHER, HE GOT HEALTHY VOTES IN NY AND CA. HE WILL WIN THOSE STATES IN NOV. REMEMBER PEOPLE WHO VOTED FOR OBAMA , WILL VOTE FOR MCCAIN IF OBAMA IS NOT THE NOMINEE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CLINTON SHOULD GIVE UP, SHE CANNOT BE THE NOMINEE, SHE NEVER LEARNED TO REPRESENT THE WHOLE COUNTRY. OBAMA MAY NOT HAVE WON SOME BIG STATES BUT HE DID NOT GET BLOWN OUT EITHER, HE GOT HEALTHY VOTES IN NY AND CA. HE WILL WIN THOSE STATES IN NOV. REMEMBER PEOPLE WHO VOTED FOR OBAMA , WILL VOTE FOR MCCAIN IF OBAMA IS NOT THE NOMINEE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
