March 18th, 2008
03:30 PM ET
3 years ago

Archives to release Clinton's first lady schedules

 The National Archives will release Hillary Clinton's schedules while first lady.
The National Archives will release Hillary Clinton's schedules while first lady.

WASHINGTON (CNN) - Over 11,000 pages of Hillary Clinton's schedule as first lady are set to be released to the public on Wednesday, the National Archives announced.

The documents are among those the Obama campaign has long said need to be made public in order to fully evaluate the New York senator's experience and tenure while First Lady.

In a statement Tuesday, the Archives said the documents are from the files of Patti Solis Doyle, the director of Clinton's scheduling while she was first lady, and later the manager of her presidential campaign. Doyle stepped down from managing the campaign earlier this year after a string of poor showings in primary contests.

“Arranged chronologically, these records document in detail the activities of the First Lady, including meetings, trips, speaking engagements and social activities for the eight years of the Clinton Administration,” the statement said.

The documents are among those that were the center of a legal battle between the Archives and Judicial Watch, a conservative public interest group that has long urged a speedier release of files from the Clinton White House years.

In a court motion earlier this month, the Archives promised to release the schedules by the end of the month, but said it will need "one to two years" to process remaining documents, including over 20,000 pages of call logs - an indication those documents won't be released by the November 4 presidential election.

According to the Archives statement, 4,746 of the schedules have redactions, information removed before being released, that largely relate to privacy concerns and include "social security numbers, telephone numbers, and home addresses."

The documents will be available for view on the Clinton Library's Web site.

– CNN Ticker Producer Alexander Mooney


Filed under: Hillary Clinton
soundoff (393 Responses)
  1. JV

    Why is this not surprising. How long have the Clinton's been out of the white house? atleast 8 years right? That was plenty of time to get ssn, telephone numbers etc. off the records.

    Releasing partial documents, laughable! But really, who cares. You all just run your campaign with dignity and move on with the election.

    GO OBAMA!!!

    March 18, 2008 03:49 pm at 3:49 pm |
  2. Terry

    Just feed us a few bread crumbs, most American will only focus on the headline and not the jest of the whole story. I lived through the Clintons and no longer want to experience the hell all over. Go away Hillary Go Obama 08

    March 18, 2008 03:50 pm at 3:50 pm |
  3. What A Difference

    When I thought Hillary was a decent person, no one could be prouder. But when she showed her true colors in NH, I along with my friends were shocked.

    What a difference this presidential campaign has made in my opinion of so many people, Hillary and Geraldine Ferraro...it's amazing.

    Well, I'm not in the dark any longer and my vote will go to someone else. I won't say who, but I'm excited about the process.

    March 18, 2008 03:51 pm at 3:51 pm |
  4. Will-South Dakota

    Well 35 years of experience is now in the open.....America will know exactly how she shaped the world, foreign policy while first lady.

    March 18, 2008 03:51 pm at 3:51 pm |
  5. YOU NEED TO KNOW

    Senator Obama does not condone the statements nor does he share the same thoughts as Rev. Wright. So why is it people are saying that I just looked at the video OF Rev. Wright and it's horrible and I'm not voting for Barack Obama. This is stupid…..wake up and realize that Senator Obama finds the video just as offensive as many of you HE DID NOT SAY THOSE THINGS AND HE WAS NOT IN THE VIDEO….DON"T LET YOUR OWN PREJUDICES GET IN THE WAY OF MOVING THE COUNTRY FORWARD

    Obama 08

    March 18, 2008 03:52 pm at 3:52 pm |
  6. Helen

    Leah - you are so full of it!

    All I need to say to you and all readers –the Economy is the # 1 Issue and I am confident that Sen. Hilary, if successful, would be best to handle the present crisis.

    Good Luck Sen. Clinton

    March 18, 2008 03:52 pm at 3:52 pm |
  7. Anonymous

    where is Obama when Hilary is in White House?

    March 18, 2008 03:54 pm at 3:54 pm |
  8. Jay in Arkansas

    I'm sure they burned all the contradictory information.

    March 18, 2008 03:55 pm at 3:55 pm |
  9. KCBob

    If Hillary wins (steals) the nomination then we will have 4 more years of Bush fiscal policies. There is no way she will win against McCain, and I dont think our economy can take much more republican greed and corruption.

    I am all for having a woman as President...just not Hillary Clinton. Please vote for who is best for our country! Do not pick a person because of their sex or skin color! Anything else is treason.

    If you put aside your prejudice then the choice is clear.

    Obama '08

    March 18, 2008 03:55 pm at 3:55 pm |
  10. Megan O. Toronto, ON, Canada

    about time to see Hillary's 11,000 pages of "experiences"

    March 18, 2008 03:55 pm at 3:55 pm |
  11. hard left!!!!!

    Amazeing. ppl complain about Obama sittin in church for 20 years listioning to a raceist pastor. Well i've lived my whole life in America listioning to raceist remarks. does tht make evrybody in America raceist?? Obama 08

    March 18, 2008 03:57 pm at 3:57 pm |
  12. shirley

    If Hillary had not claimed she was "Co-President" during Bill's term, no one would have asked for supporting documentation. I am much more interested in seeing her 2006 tax return as she has made such an issue of holding back when every other candidate has released their's, I now feel there is something in that return that Hillary doesn't want voter's to see until after the election.

    March 18, 2008 03:57 pm at 3:57 pm |
  13. just joe

    Hey...loved the headline for this story.......on anotherCNN page we were headlined that the Hillary Papers were going to REVEALED.
    You guys better act a liitle less partisan......hate to see you looking and acting like the F Network

    March 18, 2008 03:57 pm at 3:57 pm |
  14. Nando, Florida

    I have a Feeling that when they release those tax returns we will see a Lot of foreign names that sound like Arabic and Indian names .

    HILLARY ready to sell us out on DAY ONE!!!!!!!!!

    March 18, 2008 03:58 pm at 3:58 pm |
  15. Tim

    SOME of the documents. Not all.

    Tax returns...still no...not yet.

    It's the same old Clintons playing the same old game.

    And this is why 47% of the country says they will never vote for Hillary.

    March 18, 2008 03:59 pm at 3:59 pm |
  16. John

    Why do people always rush to say something bad about our next president? They go out of thier way to do it. Whlie Obama lies about everything, they choose to ignore it, and crucify a very good lady
    Idiots apparently can't remember that tax filing day is and has always been APRIL 15. And besides that, it's not anyones business but hers.

    March 18, 2008 04:00 pm at 4:00 pm |
  17. KJ, CA

    Enough already. From reading these comments almost all of you are either Clinton or Obama supporters and I am appalled at the level of anger/hate spewing from a lot of them. Keep it up and you might as well just hand the keys to the White House to John McCain.

    March 18, 2008 04:00 pm at 4:00 pm |
  18. Val

    Dana Point, Ca

    You could not have said it better.

    March 18, 2008 04:00 pm at 4:00 pm |
  19. Harry, NY

    FYI: A schedule means nothing as far as experience. It does not show any sort of actual involvement or attendance for that matter.

    This is very thin as far as showing any hands on experience.

    March 18, 2008 04:00 pm at 4:00 pm |
  20. dlyn

    If you can't release papers from the white house years when Bill was in office, then you absolutely can't be trusted and there will be NO vote. How true to form, HRC statement today on Barack Obamas comments . . . ."I haven't read it. . . ."just like the little "inconsequential" incident of sending the US into an illegal war. . .she didn't "bother" to read that either !! No way, if you can't be bothered by reading the paperwork, then you're not entitled to sit in the office !

    March 18, 2008 04:01 pm at 4:01 pm |
  21. WArt

    THe most interesting information has been redacted. What does that tell ya.

    March 18, 2008 04:01 pm at 4:01 pm |
  22. Charlie

    White guy for Obama.

    Hate Hillary and the Phony Clintons. Clintons have more scandals and lied to American's more than any other presidents (They might come close to Bush)

    March 18, 2008 04:01 pm at 4:01 pm |
  23. Vote Obama

    PENNSYLVANIANS READ BELOW ABOUT THE CLINTONS RELATIONSHOP WITH ED RENDELL AND THE LAWSUIT THEY'RE CONVENIENTLY KEEPING FROM US ALL!!!!!
    ======================================================

    For Immediate Release
    Jun 21, 2001 Contact: Press Office
    202-646-5172

    NEW LAWSUIT LAYS OUT ILLEGAL SCHEME BY CLINTONS TO HELP HILLARY CLINTON’S SENATE CAMPAIGN

    $2 Million in Unreported Campaign Contributions for Hollywood Gala Fundraiser

    Judicial Watch Client Alleges Pardongate Role by Former DNC Chair Ed Rendell And Names Major Hollywood Stars Such As Brad Pitt and Barbra Streisand As Witnesses

    (Washington, DC) Judicial Watch, the public interest law firm that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, filed a lawsuit yesterday in California state court against Bill and Hillary Clinton, and Hillary Clinton’s Senate campaign committees (among others) on behalf of a major Clinton and DNC donor, Peter Paul. Mr. Paul, an international businessman who has had a distinguished career in philanthropy and in production and marketing, gave approximately $2 million in direct, in-kind contributions last year for Hillary Clinton’s Senate campaign. Mr. Paul gave the money in support of the “Hollywood Tribute to Bill Clinton” held on August 12, 2000. The lawsuit seeks damages from the Clintons and others over the fraud scheme. Among the lawsuit’s allegations:

    * Mr. Paul paid the $2 million to the Clinton campaign as part of a $17 million offer to Bill Clinton to work with Mr. Paul’s companies after he left the Oval Office. This contribution was never reported to the Federal Election Commission, and Mrs. Clinton and her campaign lied to the media about the contributions and Mr. Paul’s funding of the gala tribute.

    * Mr. Paul discussed a potential presidential pardon for prior felony convictions in return for his political contributions with then DNC Chairman Ed Rendell.

    * The Clinton campaign knowingly allowed a foreign national to attend the “Hollywood Tribute” in exchange for a $27,000 contribution. This foreign national later attended the India State Dinner.

    * After telling The Washington Post that they did not and would not accept any contributions from Mr. Paul, Mrs. Clinton’s campaign finance director, David Rosen, demanded Mr. Paul make another (never reported) $55,000 contribution for a separate fundraiser for Mrs. Clinton to a third party – a pro-abortion group in Illinois.

    * Mr. and Mrs. Clinton made repeated calls to Mr. Paul to thank him for his financing of the Hollywood Tribute. Mr. Paul also had extensive discussions with Chelsea Clinton, Al Gore, and many aides and others to the Clintons regarding his funding of the Hollywood Tribute and his plans to work with Mr. Clinton after he left office.

    * Hollywood stars, such as Brad Pitt, Barbra Streisand, John Travolta, and Cher, are named as witnesses in the complaint.

    Mr. Paul has documentary evidence of his close relationship with the Clintons, including checks, thank you notes from the Clintons themselves, and candid video and photographs. Mr. Paul, who faces indictment on alleged securities violations, is eager to cooperate with the U.S. Justice Department, so that all involved are brought to justice.

    To view the court document CLICK HERE
    © Copyright 1997-2002, Judicial Watch, Inc.

    March 18, 2008 04:02 pm at 4:02 pm |
  24. Sandra

    To anyone and everyone stating anything about Mr. Wright: Listen to Obama's speech. Listen to it all. Absorb it people. It is all about what we are and what we are not. It is all about the very things you stand there and complain about... well? WELL? Are you ready to make it better? Lets do it ...

    GO OBAMA !!!!!

    The greatest uniter of our nation's history.

    YES WE CAN !!!!!!

    March 18, 2008 04:03 pm at 4:03 pm |
  25. Democratic

    I am not voting for Obama – he is did not do what he has promised. He is "going" to give us CHANGE!!! After the pastor's speech what we got is just lip-service. He is just like all them politicans ... he needs the black vote, therefore he cannot abandon the pastor.
    To answer Dana Point – Separation of Church & Politics is only on paper. The early settlers came to American because they were prosecuted for their religion. Also these people were "criminals" – they "killed" and took most of the Indians who had helped them. So get over it ... there is no separation of Church & Politics.
    I did not see Obama separate himself completely from the pastor ... so wake up!!!

    March 18, 2008 04:03 pm at 4:03 pm |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16