"Redactions" another word for forgery.

Examine the Venom that spued from Rev. Wright towards all except , of course, OBAMA!

Now they can start working on her tax records. No way in hell they will take the time to edit the jucy parts.

Clinton-Obama in 2008
Obama- in 2012 or beyond!

Despite all the hate out there.... If Obama wins and doesn't select Clinton as his running mate, he and the Democratic Party will come up the losers during this election cycle.

-female feminist extremists who think they are another sex

-ignorant and border line racist bipolars

-Borderline Republican

-Far Right Republicans posing as Dems

-don'l like the truth and would rather be lied to

-was mistreated as a child and hold deep seated emotional issues

The BOTTOM LINE come Nov the Democratic party needs to be united and The GOP expelled from the White house if you've been here the last 8 years there is no question as to why either.

I recall many public white figures resigning, going on unpaid suspension from their job, being fired, and generally being publicly crucified for saying racially inflammatory remarks.

This happens regardless of whether the remarks were intentionally bigoted, poorly worded to allow several interpretations, or are a far stretch to be considered racial at all. No regard is given to the character of these individuals based on their lifetime achievements. Our society casts them out completely without a second thought, and rightfully so.

Why now, in the rare public case of a black man making clearly intentional, heavily bigoted remarks, do we alter our definition of a bigot to exclude Wright based on the color of his skin? We owe him the respect of completely rejecting him from our society to signal that we don’t tolerate anyone like him. He owes every American an apology and should remove himself from public influence.

WHERE MAY I ASK, ARE HIS RECORDS????????????????????
WHERE ARE HIS TAX RETURNS FROM PREVIOUS YEARS BESIDES THE ONE YEAR HE RELEASED????????????? WHERE ARE THE RECORDS FROM HIS REZKO DEALINGS????????????????????

You people will never be happy.

Go find a rock and crawl under it if you are going to be so pessimistic in life.

OBAMA IS OUR PRESIDENT.

We need him, he whole world needs this guy

"What is she hiding? Why was information removed?"

What is it with people and their apparent inability to R-E-A-D... The National Archives controls the documents and when / how they can be released - it is up to them to release it, not the President / First Lady. Information was "redacted" (blacked out) for privacy reasons... phone numbers, addresses, social security numbers, etc.. Not a big deal.

As for her tax returns... yes, she should release them, but enough of the harping. 20 years' worth of Clinton tax returns are already available to the public; Obama released *one* year of his tax returns, for 2006. Let me try an Obama nutjob's approach to this when I ask, "What is he hiding by not releasing ALL of his tax returns?!????!???"

Chill out people.... Rabid pitbulls are more pleasant to be around than Obama supporters....

WHEN YOU START PICKING ON HILLARY SUPPORTERS ,S COMMENTS,,

IT LOOKS BAD ON U AND UR CANDIDATE ,,AND IT SHOWS EXACTLY WHAT UR CANDIDATE IS ,,ARROGANT,,,,

AND BY THE WAY ,,,,,,WE ARE IN AMERICA,,,FREE SPEECH ,,,,,YOU GOT SOMETHING TO SAY ,,,,,,SAY IT ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,OR SHUT UP

It is the National Archives that are saying that it will take one to two years to process the remainder of the documents for proper release!
You are all so quick to judge, but you don't want to give proper procedure a chance to take place.

It's no wonder Obama generally looks squeeky clean (until recently). He's got a horde of mindless automotons whom most can't even name one single accomplishment of Obama, doing the dirty work for him.

You're all acting like a bunch of cattle being herded by Obama, but little do you know your being led to the salughter…

The only things that are being edited are phone numbers, addresses and other personal information.

GEEZ...give her a friggin' break already!

GO HILLARY!!!

TELL ME ABOUT THE ILLUMINATI. MAYBE YOU ARE PART OF THEM AND THAT IS WHY YOU AR SUPPORTING YOU KNOW WHO?

THANKS

" March 18th, 2008 2:14 pm ET
I'm sorry but we need to see everything. Why erase about 5000 schedules? What Americans should be asking is " What are really in these 4000+ schedules that had been retracted. Scams of course. Why would anyone even vote for this woman."

there are certain things which cannot be publicized. If you would read the full article, you would – maybe – notice that social security numbers will not be disclosed ( do you want to know them?) , phone numbers, and others -these are none of public business. You must agree with this.
Also personal things, or national security issues cannot be disclosed. It is up to government to decide, not you.

People who accuse one candidate of playing the gender card won't win me over with a candidate accused of playing the race card, who says "it isn't about race" but, judging from many of the fearmongering comments on this blog (and his pastor's), it is, still, in 2008, about race after all.

In the same token, people who accuse one candidate of not having enough experience can't win me over without showing me the "35 years of" experience the other candidate claims (but only now is beginning to release to the public, and will not be fully disclosed before the election is over).

In spite of all the media snippets being thrown our way today, no one seems willing or able to discuss the real issues: Senator Obama STILL leads in pledged delegates and short of a blow out in the remaining primaries will continue to lead at the convention. Florida isn't going to have a re-vote, and it looks very unlikely that the original Florida votes will be permitted to stand. The real questions for today are: how much will the Michigan re-vote affect the total count, were the superdelegates watching today's news events, and how are they going to respond? The superdelegates are most likely going to be the "decider" of the Democrat nomination, but only in the sense of providing enough votes to reach the 2,025 needed. People worry about the superdelegates taking the vote away from the American people, but Pelosi, the convention chair, has already hinted this won't happen by telling the media it would be bad for the superdelegates to go against the vote of the people.

Pelosi's statement that Senators Clinton and Obama will not appear on the same ballot also appears to be not only a response to Clinton's "dream ticket" idea, but also a warning that dealmaking would not be permitted - the delegate count will most likely be how the superdelegates make their final decision.

This seems to suggest most of the superdelegates will end up voting for whoever comes to the convention with the most delegates, which at this point appears to be Senator Obama, but, again, admittedly could change, although it is unlikely this will occur.

But where's the blog thread on that?

McCain will walk all over Hillary's "experience" fairy tale.

Stop the speech preaching BHO!

Anyone but a liar and a racist 08!

NO NO NO
GO GO GO
HILARY HILARY HILARY
RUN RUN RUN
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I know you are just one person writing this in in many different names, so just drop it, you're jig is up.

GO OBAMA !!!!!

The greatest uniter of our nation's history.

YES WE CAN !!!!!!

For Immediate Release
Jun 21, 2001 Contact: Press Office
202-646-5172

NEW LAWSUIT LAYS OUT ILLEGAL SCHEME BY CLINTONS TO HELP HILLARY CLINTON’S SENATE CAMPAIGN

$2 Million in Unreported Campaign Contributions for Hollywood Gala Fundraiser

Judicial Watch Client Alleges Pardongate Role by Former DNC Chair Ed Rendell And Names Major Hollywood Stars Such As Brad Pitt and Barbra Streisand As Witnesses

(Washington, DC) Judicial Watch, the public interest law firm that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, filed a lawsuit yesterday in California state court against Bill and Hillary Clinton, and Hillary Clinton’s Senate campaign committees (among others) on behalf of a major Clinton and DNC donor, Peter Paul. Mr. Paul, an international businessman who has had a distinguished career in philanthropy and in production and marketing, gave approximately $2 million in direct, in-kind contributions last year for Hillary Clinton’s Senate campaign. Mr. Paul gave the money in support of the “Hollywood Tribute to Bill Clinton” held on August 12, 2000. The lawsuit seeks damages from the Clintons and others over the fraud scheme. Among the lawsuit’s allegations:

* Mr. Paul paid the $2 million to the Clinton campaign as part of a $17 million offer to Bill Clinton to work with Mr. Paul’s companies after he left the Oval Office. This contribution was never reported to the Federal Election Commission, and Mrs. Clinton and her campaign lied to the media about the contributions and Mr. Paul’s funding of the gala tribute.

* Mr. Paul discussed a potential presidential pardon for prior felony convictions in return for his political contributions with then DNC Chairman Ed Rendell.

* The Clinton campaign knowingly allowed a foreign national to attend the “Hollywood Tribute” in exchange for a $27,000 contribution. This foreign national later attended the India State Dinner.

* After telling The Washington Post that they did not and would not accept any contributions from Mr. Paul, Mrs. Clinton’s campaign finance director, David Rosen, demanded Mr. Paul make another (never reported) $55,000 contribution for a separate fundraiser for Mrs. Clinton to a third party – a pro-abortion group in Illinois.

* Mr. and Mrs. Clinton made repeated calls to Mr. Paul to thank him for his financing of the Hollywood Tribute. Mr. Paul also had extensive discussions with Chelsea Clinton, Al Gore, and many aides and others to the Clintons regarding his funding of the Hollywood Tribute and his plans to work with Mr. Clinton after he left office.

* Hollywood stars, such as Brad Pitt, Barbra Streisand, John Travolta, and Cher, are named as witnesses in the complaint.

Mr. Paul has documentary evidence of his close relationship with the Clintons, including checks, thank you notes from the Clintons themselves, and candid video and photographs. Mr. Paul, who faces indictment on alleged securities violations, is eager to cooperate with the U.S. Justice Department, so that all involved are brought to justice.

To view the court document CLICK HERE
© Copyright 1997-2002, Judicial Watch, Inc.

Hate Hillary and the Phony Clintons. Clintons have more scandals and lied to American's more than any other presidents (They might come close to Bush)

This is very thin as far as showing any hands on experience.