March 28, 2008
Posted: 09:15 AM ET
Clinton's campaign says it had nothing to do with the donors message.
Clinton's campaign says it had nothing to do with the donors message.

WASHINGTON (CNN) — MoveOn.org, a grassroots powerhouse that supports Sen. Barack Obama for the Democratic presidential nomination, launched a fundraising drive Thursday to counter Sen. Hillary Clinton's wealthy supporters.

Her supporters have recently argued with their checkbooks that superdelegates should vote their conscience at the Democratic National Convention in August.

MoveOn's drive sets up a face-off that illustrates the widening gap in the Democratic Party between some of its traditional financial backers, many of whom support Clinton, and a Netroots donor base that leans toward Obama.

Twenty of Clinton's major donors sent a letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi Wednesday that suggested they might rethink their support for the party's congressional efforts this cycle if Pelosi did not alter her publicly stated view that superdelegates should support the party's pledged delegate leader — a position that would be fatal to Clinton's presidential bid.

"We have been strong supporters of the DCCC," they wrote. "We therefore urge you to clarify your position on superdelegates and reflect in your comments a more open view to the optional independent actions of each of the delegates at the National Convention in August."

The DCCC — Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee — assists the party's House candidates.

A day later, MoveOn.org announced its fundraising drive to demonstrate its support for Pelosi's position

"It's the worst kind of insider politics — billionaires bullying our elected leaders into ignoring the will of the voters," wrote organizers in an e-mail to the group's members. "But when we all pool our resources, together we're stronger than the fat cats. So let's tell Nancy Pelosi that if she keeps standing up for regular Americans, thousands of us will have her back. And we can more than match whatever the CEOs and billionaires refuse to contribute."

Senior advisers to Clinton's campaign denied Thursday the campaign had anything to do with the donors' message to Pelosi.

Full Story

Filed under: Hillary Clinton • Nancy Pelosi • moveon.org


John   March 28th, 2008 1:27 pm ET

Keep Move on .com off the nomination quagmire.They move on .com will probably find a better person to support in Nader & Co.

Jonah   March 28th, 2008 1:28 pm ET

This is big, people - the Clintons do not want a populist base for the party. They want to revive the politics of the 90s, which effectively killed the Democratic party. As Bill Clinton's presidency resulted in losing the House, another Clinton presidency will result in ignoring a populist policy in favor of moneyed interests, those represented in the now infamous Hillary Petition.

Ardnuas   March 28th, 2008 1:28 pm ET

Thank you…. MoveOn………..Keep doing it !!!
Obama/Edwards08 Si Se Puede

skh4450IL   March 28th, 2008 1:29 pm ET

I'm in!!!

WDC   March 28th, 2008 1:30 pm ET

This election is truly revealing some unattractive political tactics that usually go unoticed. Great reporting! Not this time! Obama 08

RJ   March 28th, 2008 1:30 pm ET

Once again, this is the work of Hillary lies.

Arthur-Texas   March 28th, 2008 1:30 pm ET

MoveOn.org.is a far left organization that has been hurting the Democratic party for a long time.
All of the candidates they endorse have not done very well in elections,eg John Kerry.
Obama will not benefit from this left wing organizations support.

Jeff Spangler, Arlington, VA   March 28th, 2008 1:31 pm ET

I believe it was a mistake for MoveOn.org to endorse in the primary so I've opted out of helping them with their Obama-centric projects, but their stance against lobbyist money is a good one.

Willy   March 28th, 2008 1:32 pm ET

Here come the liberals!

Rick in Florida   March 28th, 2008 1:32 pm ET

Of course, Hillary…………..you had NO KNOWLEDGE of these fat-cats trying to blackmail Pelosi. We believe you……SURRRRRE we do.

How stupid do you think we are???? Just take your old-style, back-room politics back to Little Rock (or whatever other rock you and your liar-in-chief spouse crawled out from under) and just GO AWAY!!!!

MM   March 28th, 2008 1:33 pm ET

I find it VERY hard to believe that the Clinton camp had nothing to do with this letter. Do they think we are that stupid?

I can't believe those people were basically threatening Pelosi and other democrats…which in turn is them threatening citizens. What jerks.

WD   March 28th, 2008 1:33 pm ET

Before you start bashing the idea of Superdelegates, do some research and find out WHY we have them in the first place.

Chris   March 28th, 2008 1:34 pm ET

Again Hillary, we do not want you. Move On who has been anti-Bush this whole time is now Anti-Hillary, that ought to tell HIllarys' supporters something.

Quit Now Hillary !

Michelle in Los Angeles   March 28th, 2008 1:34 pm ET

I applaud MoveOn.org's response to Hillary's "fat cats". Remember, it is we the people, not we the rich and few.

biased_report   March 28th, 2008 1:36 pm ET

Can you prove that the Clinton campaign is using money to buy superdelagates as you state in the second paragraph of this report?

Steve   March 28th, 2008 1:37 pm ET

I find it very hard to believe that Mrs. Clinton didn't know beforehand about the letter that was sent to Ms. Pelosi. I think it very poor of the Clinton campaign to attempt intimidating Ms. Pelosi, one of the most repected and powerful members of the Democratic party, into thinking and speaking they way they want her to. I guess, if you can't win fairly, it is okay to threaten and intimidate those who don't agree with you.

amy   March 28th, 2008 1:38 pm ET

Is the letter posted anywhere for view?
Does anyone know the identities of the "20 millionaires" that want to buy the election/nomination and use their money to force Hillary down our throats?

I for one want to know who these people are so I can ask them who the hell they think they are.

breanna   March 28th, 2008 1:38 pm ET

Moveon.org needs to just move on.

v.ananthan   March 28th, 2008 1:38 pm ET

OBAMA IS COPYING EVERYTHING FROM HILLARY NOW AND MOVE ON ORG IS WASTING THEIR MONEY………………….

Marc in DeKalb, IL   March 28th, 2008 1:42 pm ET

Sure, it had nothing to do with the Clinton campaign, it just happened that they were all Clinton supporters with a large financial stake in her campaign… coming together and jointly sending letters at the same time to a single individual.

It was all just one big coincidence, right?

Nonna   March 28th, 2008 1:42 pm ET

MoveOn is totally right and I totally support them!
Go MoveOn and I hope we can stop this Hillary demand to be president!

Vince Los Angeles, CA   March 28th, 2008 1:43 pm ET

I don't understand you Hillary people…you bash Obama for speaking about HOPE and then you turn around and encourage Clinton to stay in the race HOPEING she'll get enough….what exactly????? She CANNOT gain enough votes to catch Obama….what part of that do you guys not understand…it seems as though you are hoping against hope that somehow, someway the numbers will reverse….THEY WON'T…it's mathematically impossible given the number of Democratic voters left, the system in place for allocating delegates and the science of probability….But I gotta tell you…it's fun watching all of you HOPE Hillary's chances change….

StopwatchingMSNBC, Rochester, NY   March 28th, 2008 1:44 pm ET

I have also left Move On because they endorsed a candidate before the general election. What got me was they held the vote on who they should support the day before the California debate where many may have changed their minds to either candidate based on that debate. At that point Obama had momentum and they were already in for Obama but tried to pretend they were nuetral. Anyone who saw that debate new Hillary won hands down. Most of us Hillary supporters saw through that and left Move On.

so what   March 28th, 2008 1:45 pm ET

The leftists who are NOT members of the democratic party now want to make the decision of who the party nominee is.

Won't work.

The democrats want Hillary.

You independents should not have been allowed to vote in the democratic party primaries.

no money   March 28th, 2008 1:47 pm ET

I have NO money and I support Hillary.

The DNC actions have been corrupt.

Open primaries screwed the democratic party.

Only registered party members should have a say and a vote in who the party nominee is.

Everyone is free to register with one party or the other.

RT   March 28th, 2008 1:47 pm ET

Hmmmmm, I wonder why the DCCC wants Hillary elected? Maybe its all the POLITICAL FAVORS she will owe them if she becomes president thanks to their generous donations to her. Since she almost has no hope of winning, they are worried that they are going to LOSE out on their INVESTMENT and want to make sure they get what they paid for!!! Such corruption….

SR(Queens, NY)   March 28th, 2008 1:48 pm ET

Count me in MoveOn!!!

Speaker Pelosi - Please take the courageous (and right) step and endorse OBAMA!

*************OBAMA FOR PRESIDENT**************

Former Obama supporter   March 28th, 2008 1:50 pm ET

like Obama doesn't have wealthy supporters? You Obama supporters seem to think that he is the underdog; well he isn't, so stop acting like it. You all like to act like the victim all the time.

lawyers   March 28th, 2008 1:50 pm ET

Obama can only win if he is allowed to cheat and steal this nomination.

Registered democrats have been disenfranchised so that independents could have a say in deciding our nominee.

The Democratic Base will unite- in solidarity with all Democrats- white, black, latino, asian, young, old, rich, poor, male, female, elite, bluecollar- We will unite for Hillary and for the people.

You 3rd world election fixers will lose.

The people's will is stronger than Obama's lawyers. Try to block the vote in America, and watch the wrath of the people implode the party.

Chris from Texas   March 28th, 2008 1:51 pm ET

I love the Hillary apologists here.
"Don't listen to them! We'd rather have the wealthy elite represent America!"

Do you people even listen to yourselves anymore?

April in Texas   March 28th, 2008 1:52 pm ET

I am just wondering if they feel like that strongly worded letter was a mistake now? Hillary sadly is her own worst enemy. I am an Obama voter and I currently in good faith can not see me voting if she steals the nomination after all the rule changing she has done just in this campaign alone. That is giving her the benefit of doubt that she really did believe her story on Bosnia. Heart of all this is pursuade me to vote for Hillary even though I have seen her change the rules as I am worried she may change the rules in the whitehouse as well as her views on issues.

Obama 08
Austin Texas

michael, ny   March 28th, 2008 1:53 pm ET

Mrs Clinton, sorry America does not belong to you or your moneyed supporters.

On the side note though, will you tell us how much deb t your campain is in right now?

Moe   March 28th, 2008 1:53 pm ET

Obama is just a puppet control by the political enemies of the Clintons, McCain will be the next US President!!!

enomisa   March 28th, 2008 1:54 pm ET

Thank God Hillary is willing to stand up for the people's right to vote and is willing to remind people the role of superdelegates.

The people are behind Hillary- No Nos Moveran.

Start a new leftist party of America and you can freely vote for Obama.

The democrats- members of the democratic party- WANT Hillary.

Plain and simple.

Obama will not steal this nomination.

Ray Warren   March 28th, 2008 1:54 pm ET

Who is financing MoveOn.org other thasn mutli Biilionaire financier George Soros! What hypocracy!

anonymous az   March 28th, 2008 1:55 pm ET

Moveon.org takes on Clinton's financial backing??? With all of the money coming from the Obama campaign you've got to be joking.

Jay Graham, Dallas, TX   March 28th, 2008 1:55 pm ET

I supported moveon.org during Patreaus-Betrayous fiasco. And they are doing the same mistake. These big donors are not only supporting Hillary, but support many congressional democrats. This is going to be a rift in the party. First of all Pelosy had no business to open her mouth. She as a speaker should be neutral. I can't support to moveon.org anymore.

jeremy   March 28th, 2008 1:55 pm ET

kudos to Moveon.org. They are stepping up to support the democratic party. unlike the HRC supporters that only care about power. this alone proves that HRC doesn't care about the democratic party. it they did they wouldn't start this infighting with Pelosi.

Same old washington politics here, using lobbyists and their money to influence. I am happy to see that the Pelosi is sticking to her guns and ignoring this desperate attempt by HRC.

YES WE CAN!!!!!!!!!!!
let's take our country back
OBAMA 2008

NICK PA.   March 28th, 2008 1:55 pm ET

HA GUYS
DON`T YOU THINK WE SHOULD FIND OUT WHO THESE FAT CATS ARE. IF THEY HAVE GUTS ENOUGH TO SEND THAT LETTER THEY SHOULD STAND UP AND BE COUNTED

enomisa   March 28th, 2008 1:56 pm ET

Move on Move on.org

We are Democrats and we do not care what you think.

We will fight to preserve the people's right to vote.
We know that Hillary is right about superdelegates.

You do not represent us.

Start your own party and vote for Obama

Frank   March 28th, 2008 1:56 pm ET

Hillary all the Way!!!

I am curious about this "Law Professor" issue regarding OBAMA.

Questions that the University of Chicago must answer are:
1) What was the name of the people that were call Law Professors at the time Obama was a Senior Lecturer?
2) What is the difference in function of the 2 titles?
3) Why do they say it is the same thing when there are 2 distinct titles.

The reason why OBAMA used the Law Professor title instead of the title of the position that was given to him is simple. IT SOUNDS MORE IMPORTANT!! MORE IMPRESSIVE AND IT LOOKS BETTER ON A RESUME — BUT, THAT IS NOT EMBELLISHING HIS RESUME, NO Because he is he TEFLON MAN and nothing sticks to him. After all the Media and all those upscale liberals who are educated just do not want to see objectively who he really is.

honkey white boy from cali   March 28th, 2008 1:56 pm ET

I am very happy they are stepping up and doing something these old wind bag, money grubbing, power hungry people need to be shut down and Obama is the person to do that. I bet the Clinton's are rather upset because they love the special interest that is exactly why she has not released those returns yet you are going to see the million slide uder the table to those 2. get out of the race Hillary you are not bigger than the party or the voters so move over and make room you could not manage your campaign and you certainly can not do a better job in the white house except line your pocket with more of our money your true intention anyway Go Obama '08

Go Obama '08

P.S. All the people posting imaginary running mates with Obama stop he already has a choice and it is no one in the public eye now least of all john Edwards if he was going to take him he would already have his endorsment

PAUL PROVIDENCE RI   March 28th, 2008 1:57 pm ET

I call this letter to Ms. Pelosi a form of black mail. The Clinton machine will do anything to get this bid. I don't understand the press for not making a bigger deal about this letter. I don't like Nancy Pelosi because is won't reach out for the American people, but I am glad she stood her ground on this. If we could get rid of the Clintons, Pelosis and the Reeds, maybe we could get something done in Washington

Hillary Soprano'   March 28th, 2008 1:58 pm ET

look at these mob style tactics Hillary and her cronies engage in, they hardly ever bring up dirt on actual issues it's always personal with them, from day one the only thing Obama attacks is her policies, he has not used anything personal against her and we all know he could and be very successful. Any personal negatives she receives is from her on doing. Now she has a mob hit on Pelosit the freakin' speaker of the house, is she crazy , are they crazy and are the Hill supporters blind,deaf and dumb?? The Carvilles, Lanny Davis the list goes on they are all drinking some good stuff, they even support Hillary's "mispoke" excuse, are u kidding me these are very intelligent individuals well at least they sound like they are, how can they not tell when someone is blatantly lying, she told the same story three time's to open forum's with a straight face sometimes with a smile and she MISPOKE!!…please if Obama said something like that it'd be over, lying is lying.

Johnboy   March 28th, 2008 1:58 pm ET

Why the difficulty accepting the truth and the rules?

Clinton and her backers only pointed out the truth.

Get out of our Democratic system and don't vote in our Democratic Party primaries.

Democrats ONLY should decide the nominee of the party. Florida and Michigan need to vote.

Stop impeding the democratic process.

EBC   March 28th, 2008 1:59 pm ET

Suuuuure you DIDN'T know Sen. Clinton. Just like you DIDN'T know your Billy Boy was cheating in the next room to you in the White House you both shared, WHILE you were home!!! How lame is that? I'd hate to think what he did while in Arkansas. NO wonder you come off so bitter and full of deceitfulness. YOU learned from the best, Bill Clinton himself.

Just like you claimed repeatedly you were ducking and dodging bullets and enemies were swarming all around you in Bosnia…

Just like you claimed you single-handedly negotiated the Irish Peace Treaty!!!

I mean one minute you play the "innocent" victim and the next your are clearly pointing your fingers at everyone else BUT YOU!!! Of course we Americans believe YOU Sen. Clinton, I mean the poll clearly shows that by the drop in your numbers!!!

Are you kidding us? YOUR campaign HAD everything to do with the Letter to House Speaker Pelosi, it has your name written all over it. It's YOUR supporters who are doing all YOUR dirty work, Sen. Clinton….and yet you still claim the "innocent" victim here.

Yeah okay…..can you say perscription drugs and LOTS of it!!

bobbi   March 28th, 2008 1:59 pm ET

The Clinton stance seems to be rooted in the 90's ……and they seem to be trying the very same tactics that have hurt this country in the last two elections . Power , money and lies it is absolutely time for A CHANGE …………BARACK OBAMA for ' 08

An Agnostic Democrat   March 28th, 2008 2:06 pm ET

The Clinton campaign denying they had anything to do with it is as laughable as James Carville saying he has no connection to Hillary's campaign. He's as tied to the Clintons as one can get without being genetically grafted to one of their backsides - which IMHO, is where he belongs along with all the other slimey and corrupt operatives, surrogates and coporate donors.

PJ   March 28th, 2008 2:16 pm ET

Does anyone seriously think these young college kids are going to make regular donations to the Democratic National Party? That's the funniest thing I have heard all week.

charlotte   March 28th, 2008 2:52 pm ET

Obama and Pelosi are both too liberal for me. I prefer a more central liberal. I don't know why everything that happens, Hillary is behind it? If she is this powerful we definitately need her on our side.

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

Categories
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNN makes reasonable efforts to review all comments prior to posting and CNN may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2007 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com