Bill has every right to bemoan the current system that got him elected in '92 and '96; if it weren't for that woman he didn't have relations with he could of sought repeal of the 22nd Amendment and extended his monarchy, you know the one that told us that the genocide in Rwanda wasn't genocide, the first World Trade Center bombing, Oklahoma City, don't ask, don't tell; now he won't have the chance to sit on the Supreme Court.

As for Jim and others who, as Democrats(?) state that if Barak Obama wins the nomination (news flash, he's going to win the nomination) "I for one won't be voting for him" this makes you either a Republicrat or a demogogue, not a Democrat. Primaries are fights, not coronations, its the only way to ensure a tested contender ready to withstand the rigors of the office. Please take your ball, go home and leave my party, we don't need you!

I never new that experience on the Clinton camp means stupidity and childishness. They still not understand what is happening to them in these elections. I think Jack was right when he ones said on CNN'S situation room that some months behind be4 the elections started she was seeing herself as president. She was not complaining and we were not hearing all these rubbish.

Years to come daughter Chelsea will be running for president. She has been campaigning for MUMMY. To the Clintons, that is experience.

Here's the MATH!!! Do Democrats really want to lose AGAIN?

McCain vs. Obama:
McCain - AK, ID, MT, UT, CO, WY, SD, ND, TX, OK, KS, NE, AL, LA, IN, AR and TN.
Leaning McCain - MO, IN, KY, CT, ME, NH, KY, VA, NC, GA, MS, FL, PA, NJ, OH, OR and WV.
Leaning Obama - WI, RI, MD, MI, IA, NM, SC and CA.
Obama - IL, NY, MA, WA, VT, DE, HI, MN and DC.

McCain vs. Clinton:
McCain - AK, ID, MT, UT, CO, WY, SD, ND, TX, OK, KS, NE, MS, AL, GA, NC, SC, VA and LA.
Leaning McCain - WI, NV, OR, MO, IN, KY, AZ, CT and ME.
Leaning Clinton - AR, NM, TN, NH, MD, OH, PA, MI and IA.
Clinton - CA, WA, HI, IL, MN, FL, NY, MA, NJ, VT, DE, DC, RI and WV.

Clinton has the best Delegate Chance to win in November.

I absolutely agree. I believe Bill is just saying this because Hillary is losing. If it were the other way around (Hillary leading in delegates), then he wouldn't be saying a word. Besides, the way the democrats distribute the delegates is done a lot more fairly. For instance, if one candidate wins a state by let's say 52 percent, why should they automatically win the delegates of the other 48 percent who voted against them? Bill is just digging for anything at this point to stop Obama's delegate count from rising, which most likely will not happen.

Another truly ridiculous comment by Bill, he is so pathetic it's almost comical !!! If, If, If—————— IF I HAD A FIFTH ID BE DRUNK RIGHT NOW TOO. CLINTON'S PLEASE GO AWAY AND STOP WHINNING, YOU LOST UNDER THE RULES YOU AGREED TO, ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!!!!! YOU'LL GO DOWN AS THE BIGGEST POLITICAL CRY BABIES IN HISTORY.

I love it when the Obama and Clinton supporters use such intelligent arguments to substantiate their support for their candidates. You can tell the Obama ones by their lack of respect for anyone who is not in favor of Obama. You can tell the Clinton ones by how they focus on
Obama's ties to Rev. Wright and his whining when challenged by the media.

This is a fight between the left wing and the extreme left wing of the Democratic party. Whomever wins will lose in November.

The major loser is the Party itself. It took 40 years for the McGovern peaceniks to take over, but now they are in control.

Bill is right
on the money.

Remeber the REAL election is the general election;
the general election is the winner-take-all system;
the winner-take-all system delivers Hillary Clinton as the clear winner
over Obama.

We need to win the REAL election — not a "practice" election as in
the Democratic primaries.

PA the big decision is in you hand, vote for Hillary. Bin "L" is watching, Hamas is also watching and remember Iran with "NUKE". Think about jobs, healthcare etc. We have a lot at stake and we can't afford Mr. Obama the Orator in the white house. PA make sure Hillary wins with a big bang.

No one really cares about the people…..you all think its a game…if our pick doesnt make it…we'd rather vote for McCain because we aren't real democrats…we're use to not sticking to our party because we have no idea what it means to be a liberal..you all are sheep. I don't care who gets in..I'm voting for the democrat…even if it is Hillary..wake up…it;s called loyalty to the party.

Well Mr. President, the 2000 presidential election showed us that the electoral college isn't the best system. Barack Obama has received MORE votes than Hillary Clinton, so the delegate math shows that accurately. Even with Michigan AND Hillary Clinton's Florida votes counted, Barack Obama still leads. So the system the way it is now is pretty accurate and representative of the electorate.

I really think she IS in the wrong party, except she's burned too many bridges to admit it. And the Republicans would never have even her brand of BS on their side.

Because I am a patriotic American if HRC wins the Democratic nomination, I will campaign and vote for McCain.
Here's why.
The Clintons have taken $15 million (w/ ano 20 on account) from the Emir of Dubai. This occured while HRC sat in the US Senate. Dubai is a repressive antiSemitic anti Israel oligarchy and no friend of the US. Nor does the Emir give away money out of the goodness of his heart. He owns the Clintons. This is not influence peddling. It's treason.

Yes, isn't it silly how the Obamites get excited about their candidate's winning the Dem primaries ( a nice thing, no doubt) in states with very few Electoral College votes and/or states with big Republican majorities that will go GOP in November? Not very realistic, is it?

Yea, but let's go rah rah rah over Obama's 30-14 majority of states won and demand that the candidate who won the states that the Dems can and must win.

So Jim, all those states (like Georgia, Alabama, South Carolina, Virginia, Nebraska, …..the list goes on and on) that voted for Obama but mostly vote Republican in the General Election, shouldn't count in the Democratic Primary contest? So the millions of people who cast their ballots, many die-hard Democrats, should just be neglected because their state more often than not votes for a Republican candidate. Well, shoot, John McCain won New York and California and they overwhelmingly vote for a Democrat so sounds like Romney or Huckabee have a new argument to make. Oh wait, they actually know how to lose graciously. Grrr, I wish Penn would just end this nonsense….but looks like we'll be waiting for NC.

Why is it that President Bill Clinton is campaining at one end of the state while his wife is at the other end, and then they complain that Mr. Obama is out spending her on advert's. Maybe if they travelled together as husband and wife they would have the extra cash to spend on advertizing. Maybe she does not want him near her? Or maybe he thinks he is running for office again? Either way two people campaining against one who is the underdog?

Funny that Hillary & Bill are admitting that they can’t win.

Even funnier is how they always try to change the rules and the goal posts.

That goes to show you that the only CHANGE Hillary can give America is to try to change the rules in the middle of the game.

Sorry Hillary but America wants REAL CHANGE!

Sweet mother of mercy, how many different BS ways can the Clintons invent to try to prop up the fiction that Hillary should really be winning?

For all the Obama supporters yall will be very disapionted when he looses. Don't yall get it,He's just getting a little fame until the end when he looses to Hillary or Mc Cain cause he will not beat one or the other.It all comes down to a fair chance,thats why he's doing good for now lol… We need a woman like Hillary thats been in the front seat before.She knows her stuff & will get this country back the way it was before Bush took office.Ask yourself,whould you get in a car with a un experiance person who never drove before? Or would you get into a car with a experiance peron?Also get off the Lewinsky thing.What ever happen between them doesn't have anything wrong with how Bill ran this country.He still ran it well.It sounds like to me that people are mad cause they didn't get a something from Lewinsky like he did or didnt get licked.Get over it.I know he left office with a smile which yall didn't lol..Either way he got the job done twice lol.. & one last thing he don't need anyone else to forgive him,as long as his wife does is what matters.So when Obama looses, just say you was warned.

Clintons 08

All Hillary supporters should donate more money so Hillary can pay off super-delegates . Barack Obama has been buying the vote's from the super-delegates, Patrick Murphy for one. How low must he stoop too win. Bill tell Hillary to hire someone from Chicago Political Machine. They wrote the book on bribery. Obama is good at this. Look at his land deal and his house. Look how he got into office, bribes, lawyers and alot of the Race card .

When will these people just go away… that is when will the Clintons go away?

So, Republican = Good (as demonstrated by the last ~8 years). Thanks Bill, I was having trouble with that one. You couldn't stand by your wife when you were president, why bother to stand by her sunk ship now?

Speaking about democratic superdelegates, some of them reason that they should follow their electorate. Some of the have even gone as far as defecting from Hillary to Obama on these grounds.

I wonder what would the superdelegate count in this race be if ALL superdelegates were consistently sticking in their decision between Hillary/Barack to their electorate choices? Like if Ted Kennedy, Bill Richardson, and Bob Casey honored their voters' choice and threw their support behind Clinton?

Has anybody made such a estimate?

DickMorris.com:
HILLARY CYNICAL ON NAFTA
By Dick Morris
04.13.2008

Nothing is as hypocritical as Hillary’s attempts to persuade us that she always opposed NAFTA. Her official schedule includes several meetings to back ratification and participants recall that she was strongly in favor. There is nothing in her memoirs to suggest anything other than strong support for one of her husband’s major achievements. And, in our personal phone conversations throughout 1993 we discussed the need to get NAFTA approved to boost Bill’s reputation for effectiveness, somewhat tattered after the defeat of his stimulus package.

Full Story

Yes Bill and if the outfield in Baseball were only 30 feet from home plate EVRYONE would hit a HOMERUN TOO!

How many Hillary people just twitched when they read his statement. How does it feel to worship such a man? A sad desperate pitiful man. That is what he has become.

DickMorris.com:
BILL & HILL’S GAME: GOOD COP, BAD COP ON TRADE
By Dick Morris And Eileen McGann
04.16.2008

Published in the New York Post on April 16, 2008.

People have always accused Bill Clinton of wanting to be all things to all people. Now he and Hillary have found a way to do it in her campaign.

The former first couple has a carefully choreographed pas-de-deux in which they take opposite sides of an issue, depending on Hillary’s political needs of the moment.

Full Story

Hillary has said that the elections are like the Superbowl. So where does that leave us now. Hmm, Hillary's like oh but if all my yards gained on certain parts of the field could count as more- I would be winning. And how is she the underdog now?! During the game when the underdog pulls ahead they are still the underdog. And in this race the underdog WILL win.

_____Jim April 21st, 2008 11:08 pm ET

Bill is right. In fact Obama is ahead because of all his wins in those states that will undoubtedly vote Republican in the general election. In state by state match ups in the key swing states Hillary beats McCain whearas Obama doesn't. It will come back to bite the Dems in the general election if they nominate Obama. As a Democrat, I for one will not be voting for him._____

Jim, you're you're saying is totally stupid, you're saying that because your candidate is losing, if she were winning you're wouldn't be saying that. The reality is that Barack is strong, he's been fighting against the 3 Clinton: Hillary, Bill and Chelsea Clinton and he's winning, period !!!

Why Bill's complainning ? When he ran for prez it was the same rules, these are the rules that enabled him to become prez and now is complaining about the same rules because his wife is losing, if she were winning he wouldn't be saying that, so you guys make me sick, you're pittyful, it's not the rules, it's your campaign tha has been the nastier, the more stupid, the most liar campaign ever in the history of the Democratic Party, period !!! don't blame the rules, Jimmy Carter became Prez under the same rules, Bill became Prez under the same rules, who's Hillary to be over the rules ???

Isn't this about winning back the White House??? Shouldn't that be the main issue? Why nominate Obama (winning through idiotic Democratic process) if he cannot win…just because he is a few delegates ahead? Clinton is by far the superior candidate. Let's go with the stronger candidate. Even the polls are showing she can beat McCain better than Obama

GO HILLARY!!!!!!!

Well that settles it! It's time for Billary to just quit the Democratic party and join the Republicans where she belongs! I'm sure should would fit in really well there!!!

STOP!! Dems, be smart about this election- don't you want a dem in the White House no matter what? You would actually cross party lines and vote for McCain just because YOUR democratic candidate of choice does not win? You must not be voting on the issues as you claim. Don't cut your nose off to spite your face.

Dan from Illinois and the other misinformed:
Hillary is tapped out in money because most of her donors are wealthy contributors who already donated the maximum amount. Obama has more supporters (and votes to match) who do not give the maximum amount in one lump sum that their candidate wastes on pizza and Dunk'n Donuts. Hillary's experience as first lady has not taught her how to run her campaign. Obama, as a former community organizer, knows how to bring people together for common goals and can balance his own finances - a hint at how he'll work as President.
Also, MI and FL disenfranchised themselves. Can we all put this to rest? They chose not to follow the rules they agreed on. The alternative is anarchy and a defunct political process. Think about this logically.

So now if the entire system was different, she would be winning? Note, add to list: caucuses, small states, latte sippers, activists, Richardson, Craig, AA, young people, old people, now the entire democratic primary system doesn't count. Funny that she was a Goldwater Republican back in the day. I'm waiting when Hillary herself says Bill doesn't coun't. Sigh.

Pennsylvania, lets end this.

Unfortunately for Obama and his bandwagon supporters, Montanta, North Dakota, Idaho and similar states that he toutes that he won, will NOT win him the presidency. They will more than likely not even vote Democrat!

New York, California, tomorrow, PA….and simliar sized states WILL win you the election and they ALL voted for Hillary.

The superdelegates need to realize that fact and put a candidate on the ticket that has a good opportunity to win ni November.

DickMorris.com:
UTS ON NUKES: HILLARY’S MAD NEW POLICY
By Dick Morris And Eileen McGann
04.21.2008

Published in the New York Post on April 21, 2008.

In last week’s Philadelphia debate, Hillary Clinton said she would commit the United States to a retaliatory attack against Iran, presumably with nuclear weapons, if it dropped the bomb on Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates or Kuwait.

Asked if “it should be US policy now to treat an Iranian attack on Israel as if it were an attack against the United States,” Clinton astonishingly responded that she’d use American nukes not just to defend Israel, our traditional strategic ally, but also other neighboring states such as the UAE, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait from an Iranian nuclear attack.

Full Story

Remember total count of ELECTED delegates (those elected by the people in PRIMARY elections not caucuses) is Clinton 1073 Obama 1089. If Clinton wins 20 Delegates (89-69) tomorrow she will have the lead of delegates ELECTED by the voters, not picked by caucus attendees.

Obama's lead comes almost entirely from those able to go to precinct caucuses and sit there for 4 hours and if the delegates were given out in winner take all it would be all over she would be endorsed.

Hillary knows that she can't win and that she might be too old to run after Obama's two terms. An Obama loss to McCain would provide an opportunity for her to run in 2012. Look at everthing she's done since she realized that mathematically she couldn't win.

After tomorrow and after Clinton's win we will hear more whining and complaining from the Obama people. I am so tired of listening to them. No matter how close she gets and no matter how weak Obama is in the general election, the Dems would rather put up a weaker candidate. And we wonder why the Dems always lose the Whitehouse?

I named my new dog Hillary, but as soon as I called her name ,she bit me !

Bill himself won the "DEMOCRATIC NOMINATION in 1992 " under these same rules.Now he thinks these rules should be change because they don't fit her wife.It seems all is about the Clinton

I can't believe I used to like Bill Clinton! Now I just think he is as sneeky as his wife. I would think a former president would carry himself better. And the whole deal with their daughter campaigning but not answering the tough questions! Could you imagine this family living in your neighborhood let alone running the country! They are doing way too much damage to our democratic party by staying in. They would rather fight to the end and ensure that a republican wins rather than respectfully stand down to ensure a democrat takes office. Selfish!

Hmmm, aren't these the same rules that got Bill the democratic nomination? He didn't seem to have a problem with the rules when he was winning. The Clinton's smell like a Hypocrites yet again.

typical white male from MI:
Way, Way to many Democrats do not want Obama in the White House and will Vote for McCain just so Obama loses.

if that is true I am moving to Canada. If our country decides the outcome of the next four years out of spite, and votes for another warmonger over peace and prosperity, we deserve the hell we will become.

Keep it up you Obama idiots. November is not that far out. And we will have the last laugh.

I am so tired of the hateful and angry and whining Obama supporters. PLEASE JUST SHUT UP!

What the ____?!? Every time that man opens his mouth, something other than his tongue falls out! And, they PAY this man big bucks to speak?

I'm confused. Didn't Bill Clinton run and win as a Democrat? Isn't Hillary running as a Democrat? Did they not understand and agree to play by the DNP rules? Are we supposed to change the DNP rules mid-stream to suit Bill and Hillary? Do we have time to start the campaign over, and bring back every Democratic candidate so that we can have a quick "do over" that will count, of course, only if Hillary comes out ahead?

Clintons = moronic and shameful disgrace to our country.

Hillary would better serve her country if she'd leave the Democratic Party (since it isn't being ABUSER - whoops! I meant USER - friendly to her). The sooner she leaves the party, the better for everyone involved.

Except the poor Republicans. I'm sure they can hardly wait….!

THE ELECTORAL COLEGE IS THE DECIDING FACTOR IN THE ELECTION OF OUR PRESIDENT.
HILLARY HAS THE BIGGEST STATES WITH THE MOST ELECTORAL COLLEGE VOTES. GO FIGURE IT OUT.
IF THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE VOTES ARE IN THE MAJORITY FOR HILLARY. OBAMA CANNOT WIN THE ELECTION. HILLARY WILL NOT WANT THE VP SPOT UNDER OBAMA

Is there any wonder why most americans are cynical of the older generation of politicians. Clintons, Bushs and McCains should all retire into the sunset and do us all a favour. Best wishes to Barack Obama and the next generation of political leaders.

This is why the Democrats keep losing and Republicans keep winning the White House. The Democratic party are idiots and they set up some idiotic system to pick a nominee. Why not pick the nominee in an easy winner take all like we conduct our Presidential nominees???? No…they have to use unfair methods that excluse certain groups of people. Then they disenfranchise two whole states. They they focus on the weakest candidate. Clinton SHOULD be the nominee by all accounts. THE DEMOCRATS DESERVE WHAT THEY GET IF THEY NOMINATE OBAMA BCEAUSE THEY ARE IDIOTS.

Hillary should win the nomination regardless of what party!

OBAMA MAMA YO MAMA NOBAMA

No, Bill, that's not the reason at all. You have to play by the rules given, and by the rules, Obama is way ahead so that she cannot catch up. Because of this, we need Hillary to drop out so we can start unifying the party and start fighting McCain. Winning big states in a primary does not mean anything in general election!!! Hillary is so full off "it."

I guess Bill Clinton run under the same rule .This has shown that the Clintons are say anything ,do anything to win.Your time is over.
OBAMA 08

This reminds me of the movie Big Daddy where the kid is playing cards with the adults, and every hand he screams "I win!" When quizzed, he explains the rules (that change every hand) and not surprisingly he wins! If only we could change the rules to suit our situation…

Bill does have a point on how the dems need to look at the way they appoint delegates.

The Clintons have gone from being laughable to being downright pathetic. This all boils down to Hillary NOT being ready from day one.

She failed to win the most states, she failed to win the most delegates, she failed to win the popular vote, she failed to raise enough money to re-energize her campaign, she failed to run an organized campaign…she failed, she failed, she failed. Why would the American people want this person to run our country? Aren't we in bad enough shape as it is?

I'm backing a leader with a vision, new ideas who knows how to inspire a new generation to change the world. Thank God for the Democratic system.

Obama 2008!!!

So wait, let me get this right. The argument I'm hearing in the posts is that Hillary can win against McCain in certain states because she has gotten more electoral votes there in the Democratic Primaries? And who is she running against currently, another Democrat?

Yeah, because beating another democrat in the same state = beating a republican in that state. How about we look past the system and look at what the people want.

Let's try this on for size, we should go with the candidate that has the biggest following, the better message and a chance at unifying the country, not tearing it apart? If we could pick one candidate and all the voters (new and old) can come together, then the GOP has no chance! Why are we fighting amongst ourselves?

Now, let's face facts. She is out of it! It is mathematically impossible that she wins. Do you really think the DNC is going to put her on the ticket if she has less electoral votes, less popular votes, is already having problems with campaign money, is not making friends with the "higher-ups", but happens to get the most superdelgates?

It's been a good battle, but it's over. The longer this goes on, the worse it is going to get. It's a shame really, we had a good chance at doing something good this election, but we can't even keep from tripping over our own feet.

Democrats will prove they are indeed the DUMBOCRATS if they put up Obama as their nominee.

Only DUMBOCRATS would think that you do not need EXPERIENCE or KNOWLEDGE to be the President of the United States.

Only DUMBOCRATS would think that all you need to be the President of the United States is a big mouth promising change that you have not done your entire life till you run for President.

Only DUMBOCRATS would think that the the Presidency of the United States is a job that does not require EXPERIENCE and KNOWLEDGE from its applicants.

DUMBOCRATS YOU ARE ALRIGHT.
AND DUMBOCRATS DESERVE TO LOSE THE GENERAL ELECTION IN NOVEMBER.

If your had the FL and MI Hillary would be ahead on all counts and the automatic delegates need to consider this fact.

I guess that depends on what your definition of IF IS?! Oh the big IF. If the Clingons would go away we wouldn't have to listen to all their excuses day after day; if Mr. Clingon would shut his mount, maybe the earths temperature would go down some; if Mrs Clingon would put a bag over Mr Clingon's head she sure would do the world a big favor!

That's because Hillary is a Republican. I don't remember Bill whining about the rules in 92 and 96.

Bill, all the what "IF's" in the world would not resolve this right now. Only the facts sir and they are that she is not winning. If you want to play by the GOP rules then maybe you should join the GOP simple as that. But since this is not the GOP, put a sock in it will ya. You all can not seem to balance your nomination campaign budget (you have already run that into the red), what makes you think we want you messing with our National Budget. America has your (the Clinton) numbers and we really do not particularily care for the way they are adding up.

And that's the reason we should either get rid of the electoral college or award it proportionally.

Al Gore lost with approx 500, 000 more votes
It Kerry would have won Ohio, Bush would have lost with approx 2.5 mil more votes.

If the DNC was using the winner takes all systems, Obama who is up in the popular votes would be losing the delegate vote.

How can we preach democracy to others when ours needs updating.

It is always a problem when you are losing the competion, Billary will want the ruls to favour them and when its doesn't it will be criticized.

Everything is wrong when his wife lost and every vote count when Hillary won, but when Barry Obama wins , its should not count or not important.
Typical Bill wants Hillary to win at all cost.

That is the reason I think Hillary will run for the Republican in the next election. She and Bill will destroy the democrats and switch to Republican.

If Hillary is the right MAN for the job why is Bill campaigning for her.

OBAMA LOVERS STOP HATING

the man has a point PERIOD!

you have to stop denying FACTS!

and another fact is after she wins PA and you count in every americans vote. SHES WINNING THE TOTAL POPULATION VOTE TOO

so if you want to keep on crying,
Go cry on Jeremiah Wrights shoulder,

How racist can someone be, and obama not even notice it.

If he is president, our country gets bombed.. would he notice it?

The DNC created this mess, now they want to end it early. If..they had allowed Florida and Michigan to have their primary when they wanted we wouldnt have that problem.

If they had said all Primaries had to be over by May 1, there wouldn't be a question where we are now. All states have the right to vote to select their candidate. Its not fair to change the rules in midstream.

The DNC has been so busy trying to control the outcome of this race we all have a real mess on our hands and its all their fault.

Poor leadership and stupid decisions on the part of the DNC,not either of the candidates that are still standing and all democrats will pay the price. Back off DNC and let it take the course you set for the selection of the candidate. If you feel you have to correct any of your mistakes, you better fix them all.

Now that the race is as close as it is, Obama is probably wishing he had convinced his surrogates to get PA to also move it's primary up earlier than what was initially permitted by the DNC. This would have permitted him to take a fully paid, free ride to the Convention without spending the gobs of cash he spent in PA. With FL, PA and MI having the most older voters (in QTY, not % as MI doesn't rank 3rd as percent), Obama doesn't want those states to count in the primary and likely hopes those voters won't make it to the polls in Nov.

But guess what, they're not getting any younger or any more liberal six months from now than they currently are! If he loses even one of these states, or Ohio, and I think he will lose at least 3 out of 4 of those states–possibly all 4–in the general election, he will become a statistic…. a leading candidate to almost become President. Yes, he'll get to appear on Oprah twice a year until 2012 as she helps him rebuild his war chest for the next race, but he will lose in 2008 against McCain.

Wake up America! I truly believe Obama is sincere, genuine and wants to bridge divided sides together. But he has been strongly endorsed by too many people that are out of touch with America. Elites of the Democratic Party who are VERY LIBERAL. John Kerry, his wife Theresa, Ed Kennedy, the Daley Machine, Jan Schakowsky, Nancy Pelosi, Jesse Jackson and the "neutral" DNC Chair Howard Dean. There are numerous others, whom the press downplays, instead focusing on central figures who also support him such as Sebelius and Richardson (that by the way was only strategic to benefit the party to not lose all Latinos in the general election if Obama wins–why do you think he waited to endorse until after his state was won by Clinton??? ) We need to give Obama a chance to prove himself in a different capacity that he actually achieves change on both sides of the aisle and change in WDC…. which by the way, you've got to wonder why he hasn't attempted any change since he's been in the U.S. Senate…. Why hasn't anyone asked this question?

HERE'S WHAT I PREDICT:

Once the general election begins and if Obama is the Democratic candidate, Republicans will multiply the dirt found thus far by the Clintons by 100 to offset McCain's gaffe comment about being in Iraq another 100 years. No American over 60 in states besides IL is going to vote for Obama and most over 40 will likely still choose McCain, especially Latinos in FL, TX, AZ, NM and CA. With Schwarzenegger being a popular Governor of CA, with McCain's moderate stance on tax issues and social issues, his superior stance on foreign policy and his renegade tactics even within his own party to question ill-thought policies or procedures, Obama might even lose the motherlode state of CA delegates! He'd get crushed in such an outcome.

McCain will win more of Hillary's supporters than Obama would win, which gives him the edge. And he would win less of Obama's supporters if he were to run against Clinton. You crunch the numbers. Only 5-10% in total aggregate votes is likely to be just enough to get Hillary to win states like FL, PA, OH and NJ against McCain, states in which he'd likely win by those margins or better against Obama. And she may even barely win states like AR, TN, MI and MO against McCain, ones Obama would lose. She might even win AZ (McCain's own homestate) and NM against McCain, which Obama would lose. Yes, she will lose AK, KS, UT, MT, ID, SD, ND, NE, MS, WY, AL, but so will Obama! Both will lose TX as well, although Hillary's pull on the Latino vote would force McCain to spend limited resources there to win TX, whereas, he'd need to spend no cash there to win against Obama. Yes, Obama may win CO, IA, WI and OR against McCain, states that Hillary would likely lose to McCain, but is that enough to make up his shortages?

These are very tough choices for superdelegates to make the ultimate decision. Do they continue to lose elections with elite, out-of-touch candidates like Al Gore, Howard Dean (we almost drank the kool-aid on that candidate!) and John Kerry? Or do superdelegates vote for the candidate who will win the general election? Yes, these former presidential candidates are all interesting, eccentric intellectuals, but Obama is just more packaged and polished. Will his new, fad-like appeal fade as buyer's remorse sits in over the summer? Can Democrats take this risk? Go ahead, but it will just push our country into further debt as McCain leads us into the next forest.

Let me guess; going to try to change the rules now? Obama still has the popular vote. I'm sure it's ticking you guys off that he is doing so well. Maybe it's time for someone other than a Clinton and Bush to be in the White House.

Lets see, Bill and Hi trash the prominent African American that the Democratic party has been boosting the profile of. They trash their party leadership. they trash the last two Democratic Pres nominee's (Gore/Kerry). They trash the caucus system they helped set up. Now they are trashing the rest of the Democratic party nomination system….WOW! And Democrats love em to death …Lol

Liar…They would eat her alive. Every lie would be exposed, they've been preparing for her for 6years and they're ready… but lovely barack threw the curve ball…so now they just don't know what to do. and bill get ready to go to jail this september, hillary won't be able to presidential pardon you for your financial corruption trial in september.

Bill Clinton sounds as if he would favor undemocratic rules. The fact is, the Republican system is unfair in many ways to voters who vote for the other guy. The rules the Democrats use aren't perfect for their nomination process, but to think someone winning by only 51% to 49% is somehow deserving of all the delegates from a state is hardly logical.

I guess that's the whole point though, if the Democratic primaries were winner-take-all, the people in small states and states that don't "matter," wouldn't matter as much as "big" states. That would have taken care of that troublemaker Obama, who had the nerve to come along and start winning the popular vote, electoral delegates, superdelegates and dominate the national poll numbers, total states won and campaign treasure chests while eating into her 20-30+ point advantages in her key states (Like PA).

Ask yourselves this question, if Hillary was still losing under the winner-take-all rules in an alternate world, would Bill Clinton still suggest winner-take-all states are better than porpotionate? Of course not.

As a Canadian, I think the Electoral College has its own issues as well. The artificial electoral votes (points) poorly represent the will of the people (popular vote) making candidates focus on swing states only. I know it was designed to off balance high density areas of population, but it's just too artificial causing even bigger problems.

By the way, I think it's deplorable how negative this campaign has become and how sad it is when people don't research anything. Sure both sides are getting negative, but I saw one side (Obama) try to keep above it for months and stay mostly factual and honest. If you do one ounce of research his arguments and explanations hold up. While on the other side, (HRC) they use arguments which are disproven or seen as hypocritical within three seconds of thinking back to previous statements made by them or blatant evidence. Unfortunately people take everything their candidate, the media or a close one says as truth without exploring things further.

Hillary has too big a ego to step down gracefully. All she knows is to backstab and lie.Who would want that to lead a country

All of you people who are screaming "I'll vote for John McCain if my Democrat doesn't win!" should be ashamed of yourself. You say you want out of the war and want changes made to the economy? You think you'll get that with McCain? I doubt it.

Get over your egos. When it comes to the issues Barack and Hillary are pretty much on the same page. The execution may be different but they both seem to care about moving beyond what we are currently dealing with. An administration that thinks the Constitution is a piece of toilet paper and that the lives of the citizens (below the upper 3 percent) are disposable.

He's right. If you hold everything the same she'd be ahead right now. The problems here are, of course:

a) Obama has run a much better campaign than Clinton has. Does anyone really think that if the rules were different Obama and his campaign wouldn't have adapted to the different rules? It would be like saying "well if we only counted the states that went D in the last general election Hilary would be winning". Of course she would be but Obama would have campaigned much differently under a different set of rules.

b) Democrats were up in arms over the electoral college vs. popular vote screw up in 2000. What would it look like if the same party that complained so strongly ended up electing the candidate that had far fewer popular votes?

If Hillary would have sealed the deal by super Tuesday, she wouldn'
t have said nothing about the voters of Michigan and Florida. She only started wanting to count MI and FL votes when she fell behind. Just to think of it, Hill actually agreed to not campain MI and FL because both states moved their primary's up. So she was willing to disenfranchise voters then, so why all of sudden with the change of heart.

Well, well, well. The excuses have already begun and Hillary hasn't even lost yet. Maybe she should switch back to the GOP. If you can't take the heat then get out of the kitchen.

Yes and if frogs had wings they wouldn't bounce their butts on the ground. LOL

Hillary would be willing if Democratic primaries were like the electoral college…because the electoral college seems to be such a logic powerhouse…

between the debt of her campaign and bills wishing we played by gop rules, i have had enough. my god i am a democrat, stop this insanity fellow dems. make a stand for sensibility and vote for our beliefs, not clintons rule changing BS.

Lol, you listen to more of Bill and Hil's stupidity and wonder again …Why do so many Democrats bow down to them?

So go join the Republican Party and good luck!

Obama would just change his tactics to win again. What if doesn't count because both sides would change how they do things. How stupid do you think everyone is.

"People suffering economically in small towns get bitter and cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment" to explain their frustration."

Barack Obama, "Unifier"

“Religious suffering is at the same time an expression of real suffering and a protest against real suffering. Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the sentiment of a heartless world, and the soul of a soulless condition. It is the opium of the people.”

Carl Marx, Father of Socialism

And if I could design the game after I lost so that my score would put me ahead, I would be the nominee. How low can Bill take the office of Presidency … I thought it was over when he got blown

Then the Clintons should switch to the Republican party. I don't remember Bill whining about how Democratic primaries are counted when he was running.

IF ifs and buts were candy and nuts, we would all have a merry christmas.

Face it, if they were running with GOP rules, Obama would have run a different strategic campaign. Obama has played by the rules put in place. Hillary has constantly acted like Karl Rove in trying to constantly change the rules after the fact when she didn't like the results.

She has continually lied, played the very same GW/Rove politics that we have bashed for 8 years, she has proven she will do anything for power including fantasizing about sniper fire that never happened in speeches, having people in her campaign spam emails that are full of lies trying to play on the fears and racism that we bashed GW for after 9/11 and in 2004, flip flopped like no one since I watched the IHOP cook sunday morning on trade while making $800k on it with Bill, $300k for her chief strategist, and sending a fundraiser to tell Canadians not to listen to her tough talk on trade.

If all the democrats want is a left wing GW/Rove who is only loyal to friends and special interests, corruption, lying to justify their actions, having no ethics, etc., then what is the point of voting for a major party? Might as well vote 3rd party rather than sell our souls against our own self-interests.

Mabye Hillary should become a freaking republican.

So, instead of whining about it, why not just join the Republican Party? The Clintons have already been acting like it, anyway. Then in 2012, Obama can hand Hillary her butt on a platter all over again, this time in the general election when she runs against him as the Republican nominee, and he wins re-election in a landslide.

Nice spin Bill!! After IA Hills campaign has come up with more spin, more negativism and more and more Karl Rove playback tactics. Boy the rich people are going to be unhappy when Obama gets the nomination and they see their TAXES going up. (Like it will really hurt them)….. I'm 61 and for Obama but this whole campaign is getting sickening. Drop out Clinton and lets get down to the real nitty - gritty.

She should run as a republican in 2012!

Oh come on! Okay Bill, I know this is hard for you to understand but the GOP rules are not the rules Hillary is running under! I know that you feel that rules don't really apply to you but the democratic party luckily doesn't agree with you. Too bad you can't influence your way out of the rules.

Wake up–all of you people of hate. Can't you understand what he's saying? It may not be the GOP now, but in the General Election you will play with the NEW RULES. There will be a different way to select a winner. If this had been the General Election, she would have already won. Obama can't win in the General Election!!!!! It is far from a Caucus. Also, I refuse to bite the hand of the President who created so many jobs in the 90's, gave us the Family Leave Plan, turned the deficit into a surplus, supported equal pay for women, and finally, was the first to do something about deadbeat DADS. That's why every new employee has to be reported to the Dept of Human Services now. Maybe, this pertains to a lot of you angry men of hate. Bill Clinton was one of the best Presidents I have seen in my lifetime. I had a very hard time, as a single mother, until he became President. My daughter feels the same way. Most of you are probably African American or first time voters, but, I say "Walk a mile in my shoes or the shoes of most single mothers, and you will want results that will benefit your child or children. The color or age of the canditate won't matter. I believe that Obama is too arrogant and out of touch with older people in general, but especially older women. He hasn't shown that he even cares about their vote. He has mostly gone for the school age first-time voters that really haven't had a taste of life and how hard it is.

I noted with some dismay that all the experts gave hints today as to why people might not vote for Obama and what dirty tricks the GOP might use against him. Yet, it was Mrs. Clinton, who voted to race into Iraq and in effect, bring in al Qaeda, turn Iraq over to Iran on a silver platter, create a trillion dollar bill for the tax payers and create a black hole in Iraq from which America cannot escape. None of these things are being cited by any of you to remind the voters her huge mistakes. Her mistakes have caused people’s lives and livelihoods. She helped to create the bitter people, whose bitterness she now hopes to cash in on.
Additionally, she will never be able to overcome the specter, which the GOP will surely gender up run ceaselessly, of Bill Clinton chasing interns around the White House as well as surreptitiously answering that Red Phone, when it rings. With Mrs. Clinton, I fear, we will see a landslide of George McGovern’s experience. But, just maybe that ‘s the agenda.

Democrats need to start acting like Republicans, unified and for the common good our the party. Democrats act like spoiled children, everybody wants their own way. Hillary should have had her turn and then Obama, but noooo, we had to pit one against the other and now we have this mess. Look how "Democrats" have turned against the Clintons, judging by reading these blogs, as good as they were for this country. Republicans would never villify Reagan or any other Republcan's legacy this way. You wonder why we can't win elections.

it is sick to see comments on the other article about Hillary launching ad with laden's images in it. Barak supporters are making vile comments because they think its a negative tactic! HAVE THEY ALL FORGOTTEN THAT THERE ARE TWO WARS ON AND THE PERPETRATOR OF 9/11- YES, LADEN- IS STILL OUT??? Since when did tracking and going after our enemies became bad politics? I tell you, the fluff has taken over and removed barak's supporters from reality and dumped them in the make-belief world of fluffy words! I hope CNN publish these comments- normally, it throws in a couple of pro-Hillary comments and closes the article for comments. It is the whole Bush-story again- that time it was the right media was blinded; this time its the looney left!

Would she do us all a favor and please switch to the GOP. She already has done enough for them for the next 20 years. Just think Bill you guys could make History once again. The Clinton's get impeached from both parties.

Please PA I beg of you to make us proud and don't be a miror image of the States on either side of you. The press is saying you can't think for yourself and can only follow not lead. This is your chance to make a difference…..unless Hillary has intimidated you to!!!

If the Democratic system was used to select the president, then Al Gore would be president. Gore won the popular vote. Think about that Bill

That's a pretty big "if"…

I once had the greatest admiration for the clintons but with all their lies and dishonesty to the American people, I have lost all respect for them. At a time when America need honesty and real leadership, the Clintons are recklessly underming and exploiting the good of America for their own selfish political ambition.
Obama 08.

It surpises me that people would vote for Clinton. After all of Bush's lies and how some many countries have lost respect for the States because of them, why would you want another liar in as president. She has been caught in so many lies its unbelieveable. Good Luck to Obama

To All Who Promise to Vote for McCain if their candidate of choice does not win: What does that really say about you?? Hillary and Barack are virtually the same on the issues. So what are you voting on? Do you want our sons and daughters in Iraq for years and years to come? Do you want everything to stay status quo? What will you be gaining by doing that? I think you know the answer…"nothing!" It will be 4 more years of the same Republican oppression.

Obama is winning the popular vote with Dems., yet, according to Bill, Hillary would win in the electoral battle. Sounds an awful lot like the 2000 presidential election, and I wasn't too pleased with that result.

HIllary is so full of hypocracy, she grew up in this rich suburb of Chicago. Went to one of the best High Schools in the State and pretty much grew with a silver spoon in her mouth. She grew up a Republican and she is now showing her true colors. Go and join the GOP that is where you and Bill belong.

Wow! According to Bill, Hillary would be winning if:
this were a republican race.
this was a primary and not a caucus
this was not sexist
this was not racist
this was counting the two states that didn't follow the rules
this was not negative
this was not unfair
this was not a media plot
this was decided by electoral votes
this was not decided by popular vote
this was not decided by delegates
this was not decided by traitors like Richardson
this was not people picking on Hillary

winning? Bill, it sounds an awful lot like whining to me.

This is another STUPID thing said by our Ex-President!!

HELLO!!!!! Hillary IS NOT in the GOP, the Democrats have thier own rules and the Clintons are constantly trying to change/reinterpert them.

The fact of the matter is Hillary has had a POORLY ran campaign and in all likelihood going to LOSE…DEAL WITH IT!!!

This is to "Jim" . You are saying that if Obama becomes the Democratic nominee. That Democrats will abandon there party, and not vote for him. That is ludicrous. He has been honorable in the way he has run in this race. He has done nothing to tear down the party unlike his rival.

Well Bill, if your wife didn't have the Clinton name, and you were not a former President , oh wait, a former Impeached President. then Hillary may not be where she is in this race right now. Pretty much everyone in America knows you and your wife. The Democratic voting system worked for Bill when he ran. For him to say his wife would have already won if they voted like the GOP is a non-issue. They don't vote that way. The issue is Hillary, with the Clinton name, and riding on her hubby's coat-tails has NOT YET, probably cannot, lock in the nomination.
Then you take Obama, a virtually unknown 15 months ago, who has locked in more states won, more delegates won, and more of the popular vote.
Just going against the "Clinton" name alone and coming out ahead is a huge win. Now add in all the negativity from one's own party, ALL the Clinton's campaigning, and the spokes people for the Clinton campaign who can't seem to answer any direct questions, you take that all into consideration. and I think Obama is ahead in ways Hillary never will be.

For those that state Hillary is winning the states that the Republicans will win…. well, please take a break from that Clinton Kool-aid Pitcher, wipe the purple off your upper lip and actually read intelligent articles (of which there have been many - search engines can be your friend, honest) that have repeatedly debunked that claim.

As an example, who among you REALLY believe California will go Republican?

Then why the hell doesn't she be a Republican once and for all?! Make it official! We'll be more than happy with that switch. Thank you Billary!

OBAMA '08

Ok Bill! Since Hillary would be winning if it was under Republican rules and since she seems to want to be a conservative why don't you both switch parties and maybe she can run on the Republican ticket in 2012. You hobnobbed with Republicans George W. and George H. Bush for awhile so since you both are in the elitist group now join them.

Yes Mr. Clinton, you are right. It seems rather interesting that all of a sudden you find the Republicans so intriguing. First it would be better to use their system, then airing a t.v. add playing to people's fears, just like Republicans do. Oh by the way Mr. Clinton, he would still be ahead in the popular vote. This all makes sense to me now. The Clinton's will do anything to win the election. 1) They said Obama couldn't beat McCain, then said he would be a good vice president, 2) Complained about the rules in regards to Michigan and Florida. 3) Lied to the American public(rings a bell dosen't it?) 4.) Laughs and jeers their fellow Democratic opponent. 5) Played the race card and now just recently the gender card to Ann Curry 6) Need I say more? Do the math all you disillusioned Clinton supporters. If she won every remaining state 60-40 and won over half the remaining super delegates she would just squeak by with a win and that is leaving out the fact that he would still have the popular vote. Enough of this, lets show her the door and come together to accomplish more than fear and division, which seems to be alright with Clintons as long as it means winning. He has my vote now and in November. To quote an old president (Bill Clinton), play to peoples hopes rather than their fears and you will win their vote. Well Mr. Obama you have my vote tomorrow in Philadelphia.

I can't believe it's come to this. Spin, spin, spin. Bottom line: Obama's ahead and we're not Republicans. Gee, Bill, what if the table were turned? Would you be so insightful then? Please, please, please, Pennsylvanians, vote for Obama so we can end this thing.

Obama and his arrogant persona will turn away all the Independents and the college students with the youth vote are seeing this arrogance and are turning from him also.
Talking down to people seem to be the character that superceeds his intentions and maybe that in itself will be his downfall.
Jim said it best for me:
Jim April 21st, 2008 11:08 pm ET

Bill is right. In fact Obama is ahead because of all his wins in those states that will undoubtedly vote Republican in the general election. In state by state match ups in the key swing states Hillary beats McCain whearas Obama doesn't. It will come back to bite the Dems in the general election if they nominate Obama. As a Democrat, I for one will not be voting for him.

My friends that were for Obama are calling me daily to say how disappointed they are in Senator Obama…especially since he's gone more negative on Senator Clinton.

How about the popular vote? Obama is winning BIG in that category. The electoral college is a flawed system. It's the reason we have Bu**sh** as president. Obama has earned his spot as the front-runner and soon-to-be winner of this race. Now, Bill, if you would please just shut up.

Obama '08

Most Votes
Most States
Most Delegates
Most Money
Get It silly Billiary!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Obama o8

Post my comment Pleeezzzzzzzz

I used to respect the Linton's very much, but after what i have seen and heard since this elections started, it's very amazing how they think that they're entitled to the presidency. it's very vital now that it's either them or the republicans, and that's a very self-centered attitude. the rules are good only when they work in your favour? what a joke from Hillbillschesels. It's a shame and a disgrace for the american people.

Hilliary had the money, the demo estab and the exp of participating in her husband national campaign. Hillary's money is gone, the demo estab is leaving her and her husband participation is killing her campaign. Accept the fact that Hillary has ran a bad bankrupt campaign.

Didn't she start out as a Republican?

I used to be Obama supporter, after I heard his comments about bitterness, his pastor, the way he handled these issues. First lieing that he never heard of those statements later agreed that he did. How can he lie, if he lies now how can we trust his presidency. His judgement in all these cases is very poor. We don't really know him, as time goes we are getting to know who really is. He can say rhetoric all he wants, all tis rhetoric sppech is alo borrowed, how can he manage our country & fix our issues.

Most Votes
Most States
Most Delegates
Most Money
Get It silly Billiary!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Obama o8

Well, heck, how would she be doing if she were running under the rules of the Green Party, or any other party. Confirms all my suspicions that Bill Clinton is secretly a blithering idiot.

just to let the guy who made a comment about the caucus in Texas that he did not go to but his .. i qoute "friend" went to where all the obama supporters made his friend leave because they were yelling and rude and he goes on to say thats the only reason we won…..are you seriously making that comment… our caucus ran smooth despite the few out bursts from clinton supportes…when they realized they were loosing…..furthermore the caucus exisit so people who are truly involved with politics get a chance to be seen and heard!!!!

i had respect for mr. clinton up until his wifes campain that is. These "SUPER" delegates need to end this mess unless they want to keep all the huge tax breaks that mcain will continue, maybe those rich "SUPER" delegates want the tax breaks to continue

Will this ever end?????????????????????? Let's face it we are doomed as a nation.

Anyone but Clinton or McCain

And yet …. another metric !

Pathetic! If you don't like the rules, don't play.

So, It was all peachy keen when it worked for YOU, but when it's not overwhelmingly tilting in your wife's favor…then it's a flawed system. Who's whining now? Mr.Clinton…stop.

Bill,
Do you even know what you say sometimes…any way you can spin this to make it look like your pathetic liar of a wife would win??? Wake up!!! this is the democratic party race…not the republican race that your wife has entered in to..how many votes does she need to become John McShame's VP???

I really hope shes loses tomorrow..what am I saying, she has already lost!!!

I am voting for Abama. McCane scares me. He has the presence of all the thing my parents warn me to stay clear of. They say he has a temper. They wont release his medical records, he will most likely not make thru a full term. Hillary does play it any way she can do win, that’s also frightening to me. Abama seams to have been on the defensive, telling me if you need to attack, then there's something they are affaid of. i personally like Abama, I really think he for the people. From what I have herd, alot of the money for his campaign comes from a lot of supports. That says something. Here I have written the view of a simple carpenter.

Has anybody wondered about Hillary's electability? She is considered not trustworthy by 58% of Americans - is that right? I love the argument that Obama is closing the gap in PA due to money. If I were a superdelegate and currently an elected figure, I would love to be on Obama's team and benefit from the same fundraising. Raising money is part of the game and Obama is winning that game - you don't think the superdelegates know come November that Obama will dominate McCain in spending? The Clintons already claim money is important in getting support so come November better vote Obama. Note I am an independent and undecided however listening to the Clinton logic is painful - no wonder Obama wins the intelligent vote.

And Bill, if we were in England, Hillary would be crowned Queen. The thing is we are the Democratic Party and these are our rules, the same rules that you won by. Hillary maybe should run as McCain's Republican Veep since both she and you prefer their ways. She seems to abide better to the dirty campaign tactics of the Republicans.

If the way we elected our delegates was different, then the campaigns would have been run differently. Don't insult my intelligence, Mr. Clinton.

Hillary Clinton
is a FIGHTER

Even with these distrous Howard Dean-DNC rules, she will still pull it off.

INDIANA
4
HILLARY

Who the heck cares? We all can do what if situations! If her last name wasn't CLINTON, Obama would already be the nominee! See how easy it is to manipulate the what if or if it was scenario!

Obama played by the rules that were set. Now the Clintons are complaining about the rules because they are LOSING. Werent they just talking about who can take the heat? Look, its like this. Before Iowa Hillary had everything on her side. Democratic money, former President, house hold name, the list goes on and on. A skinny black guy with a funny name was able to inspire millions to the cause. Now, the Dem party is inploding. They are using their former pres and first lady to bash their only hope for the nomination. Now how smart is that?

I thought Hillary was a Republican.

They're just trying to break us all down so that we (Obama supporters) will go away. Guess what, Bill, we're not going away. In fact we're going to follow all of this with great scrutiny so you & your wife can't get back ito the white house unless it's done fairly.

You thought being the president aged you? Just wait til you've gotten through this summer!

Sad

Thats why its the democratic party

He is trying to make up an exucse and a reason so the Super's can endorse her

Yeah…and if Hillary Clinton was winning, he would accuse the republican system as un-democratic.

The truth is, Bill prefers a less democratic system that favors his wife.

Bill Clinton is an idiot. And so his his wife. And it seems they are teaching their daughter the Clinton playbook as well.

The Clintons = Pathetic

I guess Hillary should run for the Republican nomination. She'd fit in fine right Bill?

RIGHT ON BILL—–YOU TELL IT LIKE IT IS —–WE NEED THE CLINTONS BACK IN THE WHITE HOUSE TO PUT OUR COUNTRY BACK WHERE IT BELONGS——-OBAMA WOULD BE A STEP BACKWARDS——WE DON'T NEED A PRESIDENT STILL USING HIS TRAINING WHEELS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

moving those goal posts again?

Hillary wins "big states", but not by "big margins", and most of those states will vote Democratic anyway regardless of whose name is on the ticket, if Barack does get the nomination over her, when the General Election comes around and Hillary's name isn't there, most of them will vote for him. I myself will vote democratic this election no matter if Hillary or Barack is on the ballot. I think everybody just needs to chill out, this has turned into a popularity contest or sporting event, we should be having arguments about the candidates' issues, which in reality, aren't really that different.

But this is not a gop contest. maybe hillary should join the gop.

I AM A DEMOCRAT

I JUST DONT UNDERSTAND WHY WE DONT USE THE SAME

FORMULA AS THE ELECTORAL MAP AND RNC IN SELECTING

OUR NOMINEE…

THE SILENT MAJORITY OF DEMOCRATS ARE UPSET WITH

FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN AND HOW OBAMA KEPT QUIET…

HE IS NOT OUR LEGIT NOMINEE AND HE CANT WIN IN NOV

BECUZ HIS VICTORIES ARE IN REPUBLICAN STATES EXCEPT

HIS HOME STATE OF ILLINOIS…

I WILL VOTE IN NOV FOR EITHER HILLARY OR MCCAIN

Hillary It Is A Honor Voting For You !!!! , Thank You , For Supporting My Family , My Values And This Great Country . God Bless .

HILLARY 08″

It's good to know that ole' Bill and Hill will soon be gone.

HILLARY THEN SHOULD HAVE RUN AS A REPUBLICAN.

SHE VOTES AS ONE & THEY ARE WELCOME TO HER.

Who is Barack Obama? We don't know him? his 3 A is from his church. Remember when Obama answered John McCain about AlQaida, his answer just like his pastor comment about AlQaida.
I love Hillary Clinton, just first time I saw her. Why did she not run as a president.
Make Obama as a president just make more a problem for Americans poeple. We will not concern about the real issue but this country will talk about who is real Obama. It will never ending. Anerica will pay high price pay for choosing Obama

So go join the Republican party whiner. LOL

Bill - I USED TO like you; but you have become a pathetic joke - Ex-Presidents are supp