<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bill Clinton: Hillary would be winning with GOP rules</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/</link>
	<description>All politics, all the time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:07:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Don in No. Virginia</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931494</link>
		<dc:creator>Don in No. Virginia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 05:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931494</guid>
		<description>Bill has every right to bemoan the current system that got him elected in &#039;92 and &#039;96; if it weren&#039;t for that woman he didn&#039;t have relations with he could of sought repeal of the 22nd Amendment and extended his monarchy, you know the one that told us that the genocide in Rwanda wasn&#039;t genocide, the first World Trade Center bombing, Oklahoma City, don&#039;t ask, don&#039;t tell; now he won&#039;t have the chance to sit on the Supreme Court.  

As for Jim and others who, as Democrats(?) state that if Barak Obama wins the nomination (news flash, he&#039;s going to win the nomination)  &quot;I for one won&#039;t be voting for him&quot; this makes you either a Republicrat or a demogogue, not a Democrat.  Primaries are fights, not coronations, its the only way to ensure a tested contender ready to withstand the rigors of the office.  Please take your ball, go home and leave my party, we don&#039;t need you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill has every right to bemoan the current system that got him elected in '92 and '96; if it weren't for that woman he didn't have relations with he could of sought repeal of the 22nd Amendment and extended his monarchy, you know the one that told us that the genocide in Rwanda wasn't genocide, the first World Trade Center bombing, Oklahoma City, don't ask, don't tell; now he won't have the chance to sit on the Supreme Court.  </p>
<p>As for Jim and others who, as Democrats(?) state that if Barak Obama wins the nomination (news flash, he's going to win the nomination)  "I for one won't be voting for him" this makes you either a Republicrat or a demogogue, not a Democrat.  Primaries are fights, not coronations, its the only way to ensure a tested contender ready to withstand the rigors of the office.  Please take your ball, go home and leave my party, we don't need you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nelson, OSLO</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931493</link>
		<dc:creator>Nelson, OSLO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 05:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931493</guid>
		<description>I never new that experience on the Clinton camp means stupidity and childishness. They still not understand what is happening to them in these elections. I think Jack was right when he ones said on CNN&#039;S  situation room that some months behind be4 the elections started she was seeing herself as president. She was not complaining and we were not hearing all these rubbish.

Years to come daughter Chelsea will be running for president. She has been campaigning for MUMMY. To the Clintons, that is experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never new that experience on the Clinton camp means stupidity and childishness. They still not understand what is happening to them in these elections. I think Jack was right when he ones said on CNN'S  situation room that some months behind be4 the elections started she was seeing herself as president. She was not complaining and we were not hearing all these rubbish.</p>
<p>Years to come daughter Chelsea will be running for president. She has been campaigning for MUMMY. To the Clintons, that is experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931492</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 05:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931492</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s the MATH!!! Do Democrats really want to lose AGAIN?

McCain vs. Obama:
McCain - AK, ID, MT, UT, CO, WY, SD, ND, TX, OK, KS, NE, AL, LA, IN, AR and TN.
Leaning McCain - MO, IN, KY, CT, ME, NH, KY, VA, NC, GA, MS, FL, PA, NJ, OH, OR and WV.
Leaning Obama - WI, RI, MD, MI, IA, NM, SC and CA.
Obama - IL, NY, MA, WA, VT, DE, HI, MN and DC.

McCain vs. Clinton:
McCain - AK, ID, MT, UT, CO, WY, SD, ND, TX, OK, KS, NE, MS, AL, GA, NC, SC, VA and LA.
Leaning McCain - WI, NV, OR, MO, IN, KY, AZ, CT and ME.
Leaning Clinton - AR, NM, TN, NH, MD, OH, PA, MI and IA.
Clinton - CA, WA, HI, IL, MN, FL, NY, MA, NJ, VT, DE, DC, RI and WV.

Clinton has the best Delegate Chance to win in November.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here's the MATH!!! Do Democrats really want to lose AGAIN?</p>
<p>McCain vs. Obama:<br />
McCain &#8211; AK, ID, MT, UT, CO, WY, SD, ND, TX, OK, KS, NE, AL, LA, IN, AR and TN.<br />
Leaning McCain &#8211; MO, IN, KY, CT, ME, NH, KY, VA, NC, GA, MS, FL, PA, NJ, OH, OR and WV.<br />
Leaning Obama &#8211; WI, RI, MD, MI, IA, NM, SC and CA.<br />
Obama &#8211; IL, NY, MA, WA, VT, DE, HI, MN and DC.</p>
<p>McCain vs. Clinton:<br />
McCain &#8211; AK, ID, MT, UT, CO, WY, SD, ND, TX, OK, KS, NE, MS, AL, GA, NC, SC, VA and LA.<br />
Leaning McCain &#8211; WI, NV, OR, MO, IN, KY, AZ, CT and ME.<br />
Leaning Clinton &#8211; AR, NM, TN, NH, MD, OH, PA, MI and IA.<br />
Clinton &#8211; CA, WA, HI, IL, MN, FL, NY, MA, NJ, VT, DE, DC, RI and WV.</p>
<p>Clinton has the best Delegate Chance to win in November.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BMjersey</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931491</link>
		<dc:creator>BMjersey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931491</guid>
		<description>I absolutely agree. I believe Bill is just saying this because Hillary is losing. If it were the other way around (Hillary leading in delegates), then he wouldn&#039;t be saying a word. Besides, the way the democrats distribute the delegates is done a lot more fairly. For instance, if one candidate wins a state by let&#039;s say 52 percent, why should they automatically win the delegates of the other 48 percent who voted against them? Bill is just digging for anything at this point to stop Obama&#039;s delegate count from rising, which most likely will not happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I absolutely agree. I believe Bill is just saying this because Hillary is losing. If it were the other way around (Hillary leading in delegates), then he wouldn't be saying a word. Besides, the way the democrats distribute the delegates is done a lot more fairly. For instance, if one candidate wins a state by let's say 52 percent, why should they automatically win the delegates of the other 48 percent who voted against them? Bill is just digging for anything at this point to stop Obama's delegate count from rising, which most likely will not happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al-Houston</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931490</link>
		<dc:creator>Al-Houston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931490</guid>
		<description>Another truly ridiculous comment by Bill, he is so pathetic it&#039;s almost comical !!! If, If, If------------------ IF I HAD A FIFTH ID BE DRUNK RIGHT NOW TOO. CLINTON&#039;S PLEASE GO AWAY AND STOP WHINNING, YOU LOST UNDER THE RULES YOU AGREED TO, ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!!!!! YOU&#039;LL GO DOWN AS THE BIGGEST POLITICAL CRY BABIES IN HISTORY.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another truly ridiculous comment by Bill, he is so pathetic it's almost comical !!! If, If, If------ IF I HAD A FIFTH ID BE DRUNK RIGHT NOW TOO. CLINTON'S PLEASE GO AWAY AND STOP WHINNING, YOU LOST UNDER THE RULES YOU AGREED TO, ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!!!!! YOU'LL GO DOWN AS THE BIGGEST POLITICAL CRY BABIES IN HISTORY.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texican</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931488</link>
		<dc:creator>Texican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931488</guid>
		<description>I love it when the Obama and Clinton supporters use such intelligent arguments to substantiate  their support for their candidates.  You can tell the Obama ones by their lack of respect for anyone who is not in favor  of Obama.  You can tell the Clinton ones by how they focus on 
Obama&#039;s ties to Rev. Wright and his whining when challenged by the media.

This is a fight between the left wing and the extreme left wing of the Democratic party.  Whomever wins will lose in November.

The major loser is the Party itself.  It took 40 years for the  McGovern peaceniks  to take over, but now they are in control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love it when the Obama and Clinton supporters use such intelligent arguments to substantiate  their support for their candidates.  You can tell the Obama ones by their lack of respect for anyone who is not in favor  of Obama.  You can tell the Clinton ones by how they focus on<br />
Obama's ties to Rev. Wright and his whining when challenged by the media.</p>
<p>This is a fight between the left wing and the extreme left wing of the Democratic party.  Whomever wins will lose in November.</p>
<p>The major loser is the Party itself.  It took 40 years for the  McGovern peaceniks  to take over, but now they are in control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john m</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931487</link>
		<dc:creator>john m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931487</guid>
		<description>Bill is right
on the money.

Remeber the REAL election is the general election;
the general election is the winner-take-all system;
the winner-take-all system delivers Hillary Clinton as the clear winner
over Obama.

We need to win the REAL election -- not a &quot;practice&quot; election as in
the Democratic primaries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill is right<br />
on the money.</p>
<p>Remeber the REAL election is the general election;<br />
the general election is the winner-take-all system;<br />
the winner-take-all system delivers Hillary Clinton as the clear winner<br />
over Obama.</p>
<p>We need to win the REAL election - not a "practice" election as in<br />
the Democratic primaries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ezuma</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931486</link>
		<dc:creator>Ezuma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931486</guid>
		<description>PA the big decision is in you hand, vote for Hillary. Bin &quot;L&quot; is watching, Hamas is also watching and remember Iran with &quot;NUKE&quot;. Think about jobs, healthcare etc. We have a lot at stake and we can&#039;t afford Mr. Obama the Orator in the white house. PA make sure Hillary wins with a big bang.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PA the big decision is in you hand, vote for Hillary. Bin "L" is watching, Hamas is also watching and remember Iran with "NUKE". Think about jobs, healthcare etc. We have a lot at stake and we can't afford Mr. Obama the Orator in the white house. PA make sure Hillary wins with a big bang.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loyalty to the Party</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931485</link>
		<dc:creator>Loyalty to the Party</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931485</guid>
		<description>No one really cares about the people.....you all think its  a game...if our pick doesnt make it...we&#039;d rather  vote for  McCain because we aren&#039;t real democrats...we&#039;re use to not sticking to our party because we have no idea what it means to be a liberal..you all are sheep. I don&#039;t care who gets in..I&#039;m voting for the democrat...even if it is Hillary..wake up...it;s called loyalty to the party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one really cares about the people.....you all think its  a game...if our pick doesnt make it...we'd rather  vote for  McCain because we aren't real democrats...we're use to not sticking to our party because we have no idea what it means to be a liberal..you all are sheep. I don't care who gets in..I'm voting for the democrat...even if it is Hillary..wake up...it;s called loyalty to the party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Weiss</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931484</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Weiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931484</guid>
		<description>Well Mr. President, the 2000 presidential election showed us that the electoral college isn&#039;t the best system. Barack Obama has received MORE votes than Hillary Clinton, so the delegate math shows that accurately. Even with Michigan AND Hillary Clinton&#039;s Florida votes counted, Barack Obama still leads. So the system the way it is now is pretty accurate and representative of the electorate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Mr. President, the 2000 presidential election showed us that the electoral college isn't the best system. Barack Obama has received MORE votes than Hillary Clinton, so the delegate math shows that accurately. Even with Michigan AND Hillary Clinton's Florida votes counted, Barack Obama still leads. So the system the way it is now is pretty accurate and representative of the electorate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris -- Cleveland</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931482</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris -- Cleveland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931482</guid>
		<description>I really think she IS in the wrong party, except she&#039;s burned too many bridges to admit it. And the Republicans would never have even her brand of BS on their side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really think she IS in the wrong party, except she's burned too many bridges to admit it. And the Republicans would never have even her brand of BS on their side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miri</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931481</link>
		<dc:creator>Miri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931481</guid>
		<description>Because I am a patriotic American if HRC wins the Democratic nomination, I will campaign and vote for McCain.
Here&#039;s why.
The Clintons have taken $15 million (w/ ano 20 on account) from the Emir of Dubai. This occured while HRC sat in the US Senate. Dubai is a repressive antiSemitic anti Israel oligarchy and no friend of the US. Nor does the Emir give away money out of the goodness of his heart. He owns the Clintons. This is not influence peddling. It&#039;s treason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because I am a patriotic American if HRC wins the Democratic nomination, I will campaign and vote for McCain.<br />
Here's why.<br />
The Clintons have taken $15 million (w/ ano 20 on account) from the Emir of Dubai. This occured while HRC sat in the US Senate. Dubai is a repressive antiSemitic anti Israel oligarchy and no friend of the US. Nor does the Emir give away money out of the goodness of his heart. He owns the Clintons. This is not influence peddling. It's treason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruth in  Philadelphia</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931480</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruth in  Philadelphia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931480</guid>
		<description>Yes, isn&#039;t it silly how the Obamites get excited about their candidate&#039;s winning  the Dem primaries ( a nice thing, no doubt) in  states with very few Electoral College votes and/or states with big Republican majorities that will go GOP in November?   Not very realistic, is it?

Yea, but let&#039;s go rah rah rah over Obama&#039;s 30-14 majority of states won and demand that the candidate who won the states that the Dems can and must win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, isn't it silly how the Obamites get excited about their candidate's winning  the Dem primaries ( a nice thing, no doubt) in  states with very few Electoral College votes and/or states with big Republican majorities that will go GOP in November?   Not very realistic, is it?</p>
<p>Yea, but let's go rah rah rah over Obama's 30-14 majority of states won and demand that the candidate who won the states that the Dems can and must win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cdanders</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931479</link>
		<dc:creator>Cdanders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931479</guid>
		<description>So Jim, all those states (like Georgia, Alabama, South Carolina, Virginia, Nebraska, .....the list goes on and on) that voted for Obama but mostly vote Republican in the General Election, shouldn&#039;t count in the Democratic Primary contest? So the millions of people who cast their ballots, many die-hard Democrats, should just be neglected because their state more often than not votes for a Republican candidate. Well, shoot, John McCain won New York and California and they overwhelmingly vote for a Democrat so sounds like Romney or Huckabee have a new argument to make. Oh wait, they actually know how to lose graciously. Grrr, I wish Penn would just end this nonsense....but looks like we&#039;ll be waiting for NC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Jim, all those states (like Georgia, Alabama, South Carolina, Virginia, Nebraska, .....the list goes on and on) that voted for Obama but mostly vote Republican in the General Election, shouldn't count in the Democratic Primary contest? So the millions of people who cast their ballots, many die-hard Democrats, should just be neglected because their state more often than not votes for a Republican candidate. Well, shoot, John McCain won New York and California and they overwhelmingly vote for a Democrat so sounds like Romney or Huckabee have a new argument to make. Oh wait, they actually know how to lose graciously. Grrr, I wish Penn would just end this nonsense....but looks like we'll be waiting for NC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931478</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931478</guid>
		<description>Why is it that President Bill Clinton is campaining at one end of the state while his wife is at the other end, and then they complain that Mr. Obama is out spending her on advert&#039;s. Maybe if they travelled together as husband and wife they would have the extra cash to spend on advertizing. Maybe she does not want him near her? Or maybe he thinks he is running for office again? Either way two people campaining against one who is the underdog?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it that President Bill Clinton is campaining at one end of the state while his wife is at the other end, and then they complain that Mr. Obama is out spending her on advert's. Maybe if they travelled together as husband and wife they would have the extra cash to spend on advertizing. Maybe she does not want him near her? Or maybe he thinks he is running for office again? Either way two people campaining against one who is the underdog?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931474</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931474</guid>
		<description>Funny that Hillary &amp; Bill are admitting that they can’t win.

Even funnier is how they always try to change the rules and the goal posts.

That goes to show you that the only CHANGE Hillary can give America is to try to change the rules in the middle of the game.

Sorry Hillary but America wants REAL CHANGE!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny that Hillary &amp; Bill are admitting that they can’t win.</p>
<p>Even funnier is how they always try to change the rules and the goal posts.</p>
<p>That goes to show you that the only CHANGE Hillary can give America is to try to change the rules in the middle of the game.</p>
<p>Sorry Hillary but America wants REAL CHANGE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931473</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931473</guid>
		<description>Sweet mother of mercy, how many different BS ways can the Clintons invent to try to prop up the fiction that Hillary should really be winning?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweet mother of mercy, how many different BS ways can the Clintons invent to try to prop up the fiction that Hillary should really be winning?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RG(TX)</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931472</link>
		<dc:creator>RG(TX)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931472</guid>
		<description>For all the Obama supporters yall will be very disapionted when he looses. Don&#039;t yall get it,He&#039;s just getting a little fame until the end when he looses to Hillary or Mc Cain cause he will not beat one or the other.It all comes down to a fair chance,thats why he&#039;s doing good for now lol... We need a woman like Hillary thats been in the front seat before.She knows her stuff &amp; will get this country back the way it was before Bush took office.Ask yourself,whould you get in a car with a un experiance person who never drove before? Or would you get into a car with a experiance peron?Also get off the Lewinsky thing.What ever happen between them doesn&#039;t have anything wrong with how Bill ran this country.He still ran it well.It sounds like to me that people are mad cause they didn&#039;t get a something from Lewinsky like he did or didnt get licked.Get over it.I know he left office with a smile which yall didn&#039;t lol..Either way he got the job done twice lol.. &amp; one last thing he don&#039;t need anyone else to forgive him,as long as his wife does is what matters.So when Obama looses, just say you was warned.

Clintons 08</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For all the Obama supporters yall will be very disapionted when he looses. Don't yall get it,He's just getting a little fame until the end when he looses to Hillary or Mc Cain cause he will not beat one or the other.It all comes down to a fair chance,thats why he's doing good for now lol... We need a woman like Hillary thats been in the front seat before.She knows her stuff &amp; will get this country back the way it was before Bush took office.Ask yourself,whould you get in a car with a un experiance person who never drove before? Or would you get into a car with a experiance peron?Also get off the Lewinsky thing.What ever happen between them doesn't have anything wrong with how Bill ran this country.He still ran it well.It sounds like to me that people are mad cause they didn't get a something from Lewinsky like he did or didnt get licked.Get over it.I know he left office with a smile which yall didn't lol..Either way he got the job done twice lol.. &amp; one last thing he don't need anyone else to forgive him,as long as his wife does is what matters.So when Obama looses, just say you was warned.</p>
<p>Clintons 08</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad    IL.</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931471</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad    IL.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931471</guid>
		<description>All Hillary supporters should donate more money so Hillary can pay off  super-delegates . Barack Obama has been buying the vote&#039;s from the super-delegates, Patrick Murphy for one.  How low must he stoop too win. Bill tell Hillary to hire someone from Chicago Political Machine. They   wrote the book on bribery. Obama  is good at this. Look at his land deal and his house. Look how he  got into office, bribes, lawyers and alot of  the Race card .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All Hillary supporters should donate more money so Hillary can pay off  super-delegates . Barack Obama has been buying the vote's from the super-delegates, Patrick Murphy for one.  How low must he stoop too win. Bill tell Hillary to hire someone from Chicago Political Machine. They   wrote the book on bribery. Obama  is good at this. Look at his land deal and his house. Look how he  got into office, bribes, lawyers and alot of  the Race card .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931469</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931469</guid>
		<description>When will these people just go away... that is when will the Clintons go away?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When will these people just go away... that is when will the Clintons go away?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931467</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931467</guid>
		<description>So, Republican = Good (as demonstrated by the last ~8 years).  Thanks Bill, I was having trouble with that one.  You couldn&#039;t stand by your wife when you were president, why bother to stand by her sunk ship now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, Republican = Good (as demonstrated by the last ~8 years).  Thanks Bill, I was having trouble with that one.  You couldn't stand by your wife when you were president, why bother to stand by her sunk ship now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931466</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931466</guid>
		<description>Speaking about democratic superdelegates, some of them reason that they should follow their electorate. Some of the have even gone as far as defecting from Hillary to Obama on these grounds.

I wonder what would the superdelegate count in this race be if ALL superdelegates were consistently sticking in their decision between Hillary/Barack to their electorate choices? Like if Ted Kennedy, Bill Richardson, and Bob Casey honored their voters&#039; choice and threw their support behind Clinton? 

Has anybody made such a estimate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking about democratic superdelegates, some of them reason that they should follow their electorate. Some of the have even gone as far as defecting from Hillary to Obama on these grounds.</p>
<p>I wonder what would the superdelegate count in this race be if ALL superdelegates were consistently sticking in their decision between Hillary/Barack to their electorate choices? Like if Ted Kennedy, Bill Richardson, and Bob Casey honored their voters' choice and threw their support behind Clinton? </p>
<p>Has anybody made such a estimate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Real Hillary Clinton</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931465</link>
		<dc:creator>The Real Hillary Clinton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931465</guid>
		<description>DickMorris.com:
    HILLARY CYNICAL ON NAFTA
    By Dick Morris
    04.13.2008

    Nothing is as hypocritical as Hillary’s attempts to persuade us that she always opposed NAFTA. Her official schedule includes several meetings to back ratification and participants recall that she was strongly in favor. There is nothing in her memoirs to suggest anything other than strong support for one of her husband’s major achievements. And, in our personal phone conversations throughout 1993 we discussed the need to get NAFTA approved to boost Bill’s reputation for effectiveness, somewhat tattered after the defeat of his stimulus package.

    Full Story</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DickMorris.com:<br />
    HILLARY CYNICAL ON NAFTA<br />
    By Dick Morris<br />
    04.13.2008</p>
<p>    Nothing is as hypocritical as Hillary’s attempts to persuade us that she always opposed NAFTA. Her official schedule includes several meetings to back ratification and participants recall that she was strongly in favor. There is nothing in her memoirs to suggest anything other than strong support for one of her husband’s major achievements. And, in our personal phone conversations throughout 1993 we discussed the need to get NAFTA approved to boost Bill’s reputation for effectiveness, somewhat tattered after the defeat of his stimulus package.</p>
<p>    Full Story</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NickSanDiego</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931464</link>
		<dc:creator>NickSanDiego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931464</guid>
		<description>Yes Bill and if the outfield in Baseball were only 30 feet from home plate EVRYONE would hit a HOMERUN TOO! 

How many Hillary people just twitched when they read his statement.  How does it feel to worship such a man?  A sad desperate pitiful man.  That is what he has become.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Bill and if the outfield in Baseball were only 30 feet from home plate EVRYONE would hit a HOMERUN TOO! </p>
<p>How many Hillary people just twitched when they read his statement.  How does it feel to worship such a man?  A sad desperate pitiful man.  That is what he has become.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Real Hillary Clinton</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931461</link>
		<dc:creator>The Real Hillary Clinton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931461</guid>
		<description>DickMorris.com:
    BILL &amp; HILL’S GAME: GOOD COP, BAD COP ON TRADE
    By Dick Morris And Eileen McGann
    04.16.2008

    Published in the New York Post on April 16, 2008.

    People have always accused Bill Clinton of wanting to be all things to all people. Now he and Hillary have found a way to do it in her campaign.

    The former first couple has a carefully choreographed pas-de-deux in which they take opposite sides of an issue, depending on Hillary’s political needs of the moment.

    Full Story</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DickMorris.com:<br />
    BILL &amp; HILL’S GAME: GOOD COP, BAD COP ON TRADE<br />
    By Dick Morris And Eileen McGann<br />
    04.16.2008</p>
<p>    Published in the New York Post on April 16, 2008.</p>
<p>    People have always accused Bill Clinton of wanting to be all things to all people. Now he and Hillary have found a way to do it in her campaign.</p>
<p>    The former first couple has a carefully choreographed pas-de-deux in which they take opposite sides of an issue, depending on Hillary’s political needs of the moment.</p>
<p>    Full Story</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meghan</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931460</link>
		<dc:creator>Meghan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931460</guid>
		<description>Hillary has said that the elections are like the Superbowl. So where does that leave us now. Hmm, Hillary&#039;s like oh but if all my yards gained on certain parts of the field could count as more- I would be winning. And how is she the underdog now?! During the game when the underdog pulls ahead they are still the underdog. And in this race the underdog WILL win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary has said that the elections are like the Superbowl. So where does that leave us now. Hmm, Hillary's like oh but if all my yards gained on certain parts of the field could count as more- I would be winning. And how is she the underdog now?! During the game when the underdog pulls ahead they are still the underdog. And in this race the underdog WILL win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931459</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931459</guid>
		<description>_____Jim   April 21st, 2008 11:08 pm ET

Bill is right. In fact Obama is ahead because of all his wins in those states that will undoubtedly vote Republican in the general election. In state by state match ups in the key swing states Hillary beats McCain whearas Obama doesn&#039;t. It will come back to bite the Dems in the general election if they nominate Obama. As a Democrat, I for one will not be voting for him._____


Jim, you&#039;re you&#039;re saying is totally stupid, you&#039;re saying that because your candidate is losing, if she were winning you&#039;re wouldn&#039;t be saying that. The reality is that Barack is strong, he&#039;s been fighting against the 3 Clinton: Hillary, Bill and Chelsea Clinton and he&#039;s winning, period !!!

Why Bill&#039;s complainning ? When he ran for prez it was the same rules, these are the rules that enabled him to become prez and now is complaining about the same rules because his wife is losing, if she were winning he wouldn&#039;t be saying that, so you guys make me sick, you&#039;re pittyful, it&#039;s not the rules, it&#039;s your campaign tha has been the nastier, the more stupid, the most liar campaign ever in the history of the Democratic Party, period !!! don&#039;t blame the rules, Jimmy Carter became Prez under the same rules, Bill became Prez under the same rules, who&#039;s Hillary to be over the rules ???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>_____Jim   April 21st, 2008 11:08 pm ET</p>
<p>Bill is right. In fact Obama is ahead because of all his wins in those states that will undoubtedly vote Republican in the general election. In state by state match ups in the key swing states Hillary beats McCain whearas Obama doesn't. It will come back to bite the Dems in the general election if they nominate Obama. As a Democrat, I for one will not be voting for him._____</p>
<p>Jim, you're you're saying is totally stupid, you're saying that because your candidate is losing, if she were winning you're wouldn't be saying that. The reality is that Barack is strong, he's been fighting against the 3 Clinton: Hillary, Bill and Chelsea Clinton and he's winning, period !!!</p>
<p>Why Bill's complainning ? When he ran for prez it was the same rules, these are the rules that enabled him to become prez and now is complaining about the same rules because his wife is losing, if she were winning he wouldn't be saying that, so you guys make me sick, you're pittyful, it's not the rules, it's your campaign tha has been the nastier, the more stupid, the most liar campaign ever in the history of the Democratic Party, period !!! don't blame the rules, Jimmy Carter became Prez under the same rules, Bill became Prez under the same rules, who's Hillary to be over the rules ???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931458</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931458</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t this about winning back the White House??? Shouldn&#039;t that be the main issue? Why nominate Obama (winning through idiotic Democratic process) if he cannot win...just because he is a few delegates ahead? Clinton is by far the superior candidate. Let&#039;s go with the stronger candidate. Even the polls are showing she can beat McCain better than Obama

GO HILLARY!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn't this about winning back the White House??? Shouldn't that be the main issue? Why nominate Obama (winning through idiotic Democratic process) if he cannot win...just because he is a few delegates ahead? Clinton is by far the superior candidate. Let's go with the stronger candidate. Even the polls are showing she can beat McCain better than Obama</p>
<p>GO HILLARY!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama Express</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931457</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama Express</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931457</guid>
		<description>Well that settles it!  It&#039;s time for Billary to just quit the Democratic party and join the Republicans where she belongs!  I&#039;m sure should would fit in really well there!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well that settles it!  It's time for Billary to just quit the Democratic party and join the Republicans where she belongs!  I'm sure should would fit in really well there!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefanie</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931455</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931455</guid>
		<description>STOP!!  Dems, be smart about this election- don&#039;t you want a dem in the White House no matter what?  You would actually cross party lines and vote for McCain just because YOUR democratic candidate of choice does not win?  You must not be voting on the issues as you claim.  Don&#039;t cut your nose off to spite your face.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>STOP!!  Dems, be smart about this election- don't you want a dem in the White House no matter what?  You would actually cross party lines and vote for McCain just because YOUR democratic candidate of choice does not win?  You must not be voting on the issues as you claim.  Don't cut your nose off to spite your face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931453</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931453</guid>
		<description>Dan from Illinois and the other misinformed:
 Hillary is tapped out in money because most of her donors are wealthy contributors who already donated the maximum amount. Obama has more supporters (and votes to match) who do not give the maximum amount in one lump sum that their candidate wastes on pizza and Dunk&#039;n Donuts. Hillary&#039;s experience as first lady has not taught her how to run her campaign. Obama, as a former community organizer, knows how to bring people together for common goals and can balance his own finances - a hint at how he&#039;ll work as President. 
Also, MI and FL disenfranchised themselves. Can we all put this to rest? They chose not to follow the rules they agreed on. The alternative is anarchy and a defunct political process. Think about this logically.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan from Illinois and the other misinformed:<br />
 Hillary is tapped out in money because most of her donors are wealthy contributors who already donated the maximum amount. Obama has more supporters (and votes to match) who do not give the maximum amount in one lump sum that their candidate wastes on pizza and Dunk'n Donuts. Hillary's experience as first lady has not taught her how to run her campaign. Obama, as a former community organizer, knows how to bring people together for common goals and can balance his own finances &#8211; a hint at how he'll work as President.<br />
Also, MI and FL disenfranchised themselves. Can we all put this to rest? They chose not to follow the rules they agreed on. The alternative is anarchy and a defunct political process. Think about this logically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TimW</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931451</link>
		<dc:creator>TimW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931451</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately for Obama and his bandwagon supporters, Montanta, North Dakota, Idaho and similar states that he toutes that he won, will NOT win him the presidency.  They will more than likely not even vote Democrat!

New York, California, tomorrow, PA....and simliar sized states WILL win you the election and they ALL voted for Hillary.  

The superdelegates need to realize that fact and put a candidate on the ticket that has a good opportunity to win ni November.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately for Obama and his bandwagon supporters, Montanta, North Dakota, Idaho and similar states that he toutes that he won, will NOT win him the presidency.  They will more than likely not even vote Democrat!</p>
<p>New York, California, tomorrow, PA....and simliar sized states WILL win you the election and they ALL voted for Hillary.  </p>
<p>The superdelegates need to realize that fact and put a candidate on the ticket that has a good opportunity to win ni November.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tigerakabj</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931452</link>
		<dc:creator>tigerakabj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931452</guid>
		<description>So now if the entire system was different, she would be winning?  Note, add to list: caucuses, small states, latte sippers, activists, Richardson, Craig, AA, young people, old people, now the entire democratic primary system doesn&#039;t count.  Funny that she was a Goldwater Republican back in the day.  I&#039;m waiting when Hillary herself says Bill doesn&#039;t coun&#039;t.  Sigh.

Pennsylvania, lets end this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So now if the entire system was different, she would be winning?  Note, add to list: caucuses, small states, latte sippers, activists, Richardson, Craig, AA, young people, old people, now the entire democratic primary system doesn't count.  Funny that she was a Goldwater Republican back in the day.  I'm waiting when Hillary herself says Bill doesn't coun't.  Sigh.</p>
<p>Pennsylvania, lets end this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Real Hillary Clinton</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931450</link>
		<dc:creator>The Real Hillary Clinton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931450</guid>
		<description>DickMorris.com:
    UTS ON NUKES: HILLARY’S MAD NEW POLICY
    By Dick Morris And Eileen McGann
    04.21.2008

    Published in the New York Post on April 21, 2008.

    In last week’s Philadelphia debate, Hillary Clinton said she would commit the United States to a retaliatory attack against Iran, presumably with nuclear weapons, if it dropped the bomb on Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates or Kuwait.

    Asked if “it should be US policy now to treat an Iranian attack on Israel as if it were an attack against the United States,” Clinton astonishingly responded that she’d use American nukes not just to defend Israel, our traditional strategic ally, but also other neighboring states such as the UAE, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait from an Iranian nuclear attack.

    Full Story</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DickMorris.com:<br />
    UTS ON NUKES: HILLARY’S MAD NEW POLICY<br />
    By Dick Morris And Eileen McGann<br />
    04.21.2008</p>
<p>    Published in the New York Post on April 21, 2008.</p>
<p>    In last week’s Philadelphia debate, Hillary Clinton said she would commit the United States to a retaliatory attack against Iran, presumably with nuclear weapons, if it dropped the bomb on Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates or Kuwait.</p>
<p>    Asked if “it should be US policy now to treat an Iranian attack on Israel as if it were an attack against the United States,” Clinton astonishingly responded that she’d use American nukes not just to defend Israel, our traditional strategic ally, but also other neighboring states such as the UAE, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait from an Iranian nuclear attack.</p>
<p>    Full Story</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chuck</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931448</link>
		<dc:creator>chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931448</guid>
		<description>Remember total count of ELECTED delegates (those elected by the people in PRIMARY elections not caucuses) is Clinton 1073 Obama 1089. If Clinton wins 20 Delegates (89-69) tomorrow she will have the lead of delegates ELECTED by the voters, not picked by caucus attendees.

Obama&#039;s lead comes almost entirely from those able to go to precinct caucuses and sit there for 4 hours and if the delegates were given out in winner take all it would be all over she would be endorsed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember total count of ELECTED delegates (those elected by the people in PRIMARY elections not caucuses) is Clinton 1073 Obama 1089. If Clinton wins 20 Delegates (89-69) tomorrow she will have the lead of delegates ELECTED by the voters, not picked by caucus attendees.</p>
<p>Obama's lead comes almost entirely from those able to go to precinct caucuses and sit there for 4 hours and if the delegates were given out in winner take all it would be all over she would be endorsed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill, PA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931446</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill, PA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931446</guid>
		<description>Hillary knows that she can&#039;t win and that she might be too old to run after Obama&#039;s two terms. An Obama loss to McCain would provide an opportunity for her to run in 2012. Look at everthing she&#039;s done since she realized that mathematically she couldn&#039;t win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary knows that she can't win and that she might be too old to run after Obama's two terms. An Obama loss to McCain would provide an opportunity for her to run in 2012. Look at everthing she's done since she realized that mathematically she couldn't win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad in CA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931445</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad in CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931445</guid>
		<description>After tomorrow and after Clinton&#039;s win we will hear more whining and complaining from the Obama people.  I am so tired of listening to them. No matter how close she gets and no matter how weak Obama is in the general election, the Dems would rather put up a weaker candidate. And we wonder why the Dems always lose the Whitehouse?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After tomorrow and after Clinton's win we will hear more whining and complaining from the Obama people.  I am so tired of listening to them. No matter how close she gets and no matter how weak Obama is in the general election, the Dems would rather put up a weaker candidate. And we wonder why the Dems always lose the Whitehouse?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fred up north</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931442</link>
		<dc:creator>fred up north</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931442</guid>
		<description>I named my  new dog Hillary, but as soon as I called her name ,she bit me !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I named my  new dog Hillary, but as soon as I called her name ,she bit me !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931440</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931440</guid>
		<description>Bill himself won the &quot;DEMOCRATIC  NOMINATION  in 1992 &quot; under these  same rules.Now he thinks these rules should be change because they don&#039;t fit her wife.It seems all is about the Clinton</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill himself won the "DEMOCRATIC  NOMINATION  in 1992 " under these  same rules.Now he thinks these rules should be change because they don't fit her wife.It seems all is about the Clinton</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Young Voter</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931439</link>
		<dc:creator>Young Voter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931439</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe I used to like Bill Clinton!  Now I just think he is as sneeky as his wife.  I would think a former president would carry himself better.  And the whole deal with their daughter campaigning but not answering the tough questions!  Could you imagine this family living in your neighborhood let alone running the country!  They are doing way too much damage to our democratic party by staying in.  They would rather fight to the end and ensure that a republican wins rather than respectfully stand down to ensure a democrat takes office.  Selfish!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can't believe I used to like Bill Clinton!  Now I just think he is as sneeky as his wife.  I would think a former president would carry himself better.  And the whole deal with their daughter campaigning but not answering the tough questions!  Could you imagine this family living in your neighborhood let alone running the country!  They are doing way too much damage to our democratic party by staying in.  They would rather fight to the end and ensure that a republican wins rather than respectfully stand down to ensure a democrat takes office.  Selfish!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931438</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931438</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, aren&#039;t these the same rules that got Bill the democratic nomination? He didn&#039;t seem to have a problem with the rules when he was winning. The Clinton&#039;s smell like a  Hypocrites yet again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, aren't these the same rules that got Bill the democratic nomination? He didn't seem to have a problem with the rules when he was winning. The Clinton's smell like a  Hypocrites yet again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ewsc</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931436</link>
		<dc:creator>Ewsc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931436</guid>
		<description>typical white male from MI:
Way, Way to many Democrats do not want Obama in the White House and will Vote for McCain just so Obama loses.

if that is true I am moving to Canada.  If our country decides the outcome of the next four years out of spite, and votes for another warmonger over peace and prosperity, we deserve the hell we will become.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>typical white male from MI:<br />
Way, Way to many Democrats do not want Obama in the White House and will Vote for McCain just so Obama loses.</p>
<p>if that is true I am moving to Canada.  If our country decides the outcome of the next four years out of spite, and votes for another warmonger over peace and prosperity, we deserve the hell we will become.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Portland, Oregon</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931435</link>
		<dc:creator>Portland, Oregon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931435</guid>
		<description>Keep it up you Obama idiots. November is not that far out. And we will have the last laugh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep it up you Obama idiots. November is not that far out. And we will have the last laugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Getty1206</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931434</link>
		<dc:creator>Getty1206</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931434</guid>
		<description>I am so tired of the hateful and angry and whining Obama supporters. PLEASE JUST SHUT UP!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am so tired of the hateful and angry and whining Obama supporters. PLEASE JUST SHUT UP!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dori in AZ</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931432</link>
		<dc:creator>Dori in AZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931432</guid>
		<description>What the ____?!?  Every time that man opens his mouth, something other than his tongue falls out!  And, they PAY this man big bucks to speak?

I&#039;m confused.  Didn&#039;t Bill Clinton run and win as a Democrat?  Isn&#039;t Hillary running as a Democrat?  Did they not understand and agree to play by the DNP rules?  Are we supposed to change the DNP rules mid-stream to suit Bill and Hillary?  Do we have time to start the campaign over, and bring back every Democratic candidate so that we can have a quick  &quot;do over&quot; that will count, of course, only if Hillary comes out ahead?

Clintons = moronic and shameful disgrace to our country.

Hillary would better serve her country if she&#039;d leave the Democratic Party (since it isn&#039;t being ABUSER  - whoops!   I meant USER - friendly to her).   The sooner she leaves the party, the better for everyone involved.

Except the poor Republicans.  I&#039;m sure they can hardly wait....!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the ____?!?  Every time that man opens his mouth, something other than his tongue falls out!  And, they PAY this man big bucks to speak?</p>
<p>I'm confused.  Didn't Bill Clinton run and win as a Democrat?  Isn't Hillary running as a Democrat?  Did they not understand and agree to play by the DNP rules?  Are we supposed to change the DNP rules mid-stream to suit Bill and Hillary?  Do we have time to start the campaign over, and bring back every Democratic candidate so that we can have a quick  "do over" that will count, of course, only if Hillary comes out ahead?</p>
<p>Clintons = moronic and shameful disgrace to our country.</p>
<p>Hillary would better serve her country if she'd leave the Democratic Party (since it isn't being ABUSER  &#8211; whoops!   I meant USER &#8211; friendly to her).   The sooner she leaves the party, the better for everyone involved.</p>
<p>Except the poor Republicans.  I'm sure they can hardly wait....!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimmy vekmen</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931430</link>
		<dc:creator>jimmy vekmen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931430</guid>
		<description>THE ELECTORAL COLEGE IS THE DECIDING  FACTOR IN THE ELECTION OF OUR PRESIDENT.
HILLARY HAS THE BIGGEST STATES WITH THE MOST ELECTORAL COLLEGE VOTES.  GO FIGURE IT OUT.
IF THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE VOTES ARE IN THE MAJORITY FOR HILLARY.  OBAMA CANNOT WIN THE ELECTION. HILLARY WILL NOT WANT THE VP SPOT UNDER OBAMA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THE ELECTORAL COLEGE IS THE DECIDING  FACTOR IN THE ELECTION OF OUR PRESIDENT.<br />
HILLARY HAS THE BIGGEST STATES WITH THE MOST ELECTORAL COLLEGE VOTES.  GO FIGURE IT OUT.<br />
IF THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE VOTES ARE IN THE MAJORITY FOR HILLARY.  OBAMA CANNOT WIN THE ELECTION. HILLARY WILL NOT WANT THE VP SPOT UNDER OBAMA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931426</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931426</guid>
		<description>Is there any wonder why most americans are cynical of the older generation of politicians. Clintons, Bushs and McCains should all retire into the sunset and do us all a favour.  Best wishes to Barack Obama and the next generation of political leaders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any wonder why most americans are cynical of the older generation of politicians. Clintons, Bushs and McCains should all retire into the sunset and do us all a favour.  Best wishes to Barack Obama and the next generation of political leaders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931425</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931425</guid>
		<description>This is why the Democrats keep losing and Republicans keep winning the White House. The Democratic party are idiots and they set up some idiotic system to pick a nominee. Why not pick the nominee in an easy winner take all like we conduct our Presidential nominees????  No...they have to use unfair methods that excluse certain groups of people. Then they disenfranchise two whole states. They they focus on the weakest candidate. Clinton SHOULD be the nominee by all accounts. THE DEMOCRATS DESERVE WHAT THEY GET IF THEY NOMINATE OBAMA BCEAUSE THEY ARE IDIOTS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is why the Democrats keep losing and Republicans keep winning the White House. The Democratic party are idiots and they set up some idiotic system to pick a nominee. Why not pick the nominee in an easy winner take all like we conduct our Presidential nominees????  No...they have to use unfair methods that excluse certain groups of people. Then they disenfranchise two whole states. They they focus on the weakest candidate. Clinton SHOULD be the nominee by all accounts. THE DEMOCRATS DESERVE WHAT THEY GET IF THEY NOMINATE OBAMA BCEAUSE THEY ARE IDIOTS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931424</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931424</guid>
		<description>Hillary should win the nomination regardless of what party!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary should win the nomination regardless of what party!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimmy vekmen</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/21/bill-clinton-hillary-would-be-winning-with-gop-rules/#comment-931423</link>
		<dc:creator>jimmy vekmen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnpoliticalticker.wordpress.com/?p=6584#comment-931423</guid>
		<description>OBAMA  MAMA YO MAMA  NOBAMA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OBAMA  MAMA YO MAMA  NOBAMA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
