April 24, 2008
Posted: 10:45 AM ET

From
CNN

Watch Carville and Richardson square off on Larry King Live.

(CNN) – After weeks of verbal brawling, New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson and James Carville spoke for the first time on CNN’s Larry King Live Wednesday night. Richardson – now a supporter of Barack Obama – called Hillary Clinton backers like Carville ‘a dynasty’ that is ‘clinging to the throne.’

The CNN contributor defended calling Richardson a ‘Judas’ in a New York Times interview after the governor announced his endorsement of Obama.

“I said it. I was quoted accurately. I was quoted in context. I thought it was an appropriate metaphor,” Carville told King. “If it would have been the Fourth of July, I would have said ‘Benedict Arnold,’” Carville said.

Richardson called Carville’s response “typical of the reaction of Clinton supporters.”

“They feel they’re a dynasty. They’re clinging to the throne,” Richardson added.

Watch Carville and Richardson clash over whether the results in the Florida and Michigan primaries should help determine the Democratic Party’s nominee, whether Obama should agree to more debates before Indiana and North Carolina vote May 6 — and whether the primary race has become so negative it’s hurting the party’s prospects in the general election.

Filed under: Barack Obama • Bill Richardson • Hillary Clinton • Larry King Live


MikeT   April 24th, 2008 1:40 pm ET

This is a double standard. It is like when Bill said Obama was a fairy tale which is true. He's not.

Now he is attacking me and every other Hillary supporter, get over yourself Richardson.

HILLARY 08

Debbie, TX   April 24th, 2008 1:40 pm ET

All campaigns are rough & tough. If you think Hillary is being tough on Obama, just wait and see what the Republicans and their minions do to him if he gets the nomination. Unfortunately, he's like all of us, he's human and has some skeletons that the Republicans are going to use against him. The Repbulicans wrote the book on dirty tricks and smear tactics. Look what they did to McCain in his race against W. And he was a Repblican. This campaign stuff ain't nothing compared to the pressures you must overcome when you are the President. Besides, if you are not smart enough to see through campaign BS, you don't need to be voting. Quit whining and get on with it.

Cory   April 24th, 2008 1:40 pm ET

All of this is really making me lose complete and utter faith in America as a society. The sheer idiocy and manpower that steers individuals like George W. Bush and Hilary Clinton towards the White House is completely overwhelming. The lies, the spinning, all of it.

The audacity of hope, indeed.

Joanne   April 24th, 2008 1:39 pm ET

What a shame. Richardson is so bitter no pun intended. Obviously, he dislikes the Clintons for personal reasons and this is not a reason to hurt Hillary or to humiliate her in this way. Obama and Richardson are both very arrogant. He is angry but Hillary was not the {PRESIDENT) that gave him the opportunity of his lifetime. How easily they forget. What a shame. Hillary is a woman with great intellect and her own person. How dare he demean her that way. I think the media is doing this adequately.

Friends like him they do not need enemies. Jamal said something last evening that was very disturbing. He could not get over how angry the Black people were towards the Clinton's during his Radio call-in. This tells me they are voting for Obama for all the wrong reasons.
Wow!!!!!!
Please do not say this is not voting because of RACE. It is. I hope the American people wake-up because there is good in both these people but Obama just does not get it and Hillary does. Wisdom!

Go Hill Go!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

WH   April 24th, 2008 1:38 pm ET

Who are all these young and educated supporters? Are you talking about high school students because that's who he is counting on. New young voters and anybody that will sign up and vote…..for him.

Again I ask the question because on the rallies I have seen, the people sitting behind Obama are neither young or look educated.

Quinn - PA   April 24th, 2008 1:38 pm ET

Your comment is awaiting moderation.
It was Okay when he was the Clinton's Court Jester!

Now he's looking for a place in the Obama kingdom!

Pragmatist, SoCal   April 24th, 2008 1:37 pm ET

The Clintons seem to have their supporters hypnotized. When Obama was campaigning on Hope and a unified NATION (vs the divisive red/blue, black/white, rich/poor, blue collar/ educated), THE CLINTONS were the first to inject race into the running. Where they didnt lead with the negativity they fueled it. When Obama FINALLY hit back – oh, NOW he is a negative campaigner. so its OK for the Clintons to be – just no one else.

They dismiss states who vote for Obama as insignificant, voters who vote for him as silly and inexperienced – dumb, they comment that they superdelegates who back him are "irrelevant and insignificant". The only time any of these count is whenever SHE benefits.

I started this process with very high regards for both her and her husband, but the longer this goes on the more my respect and admiration diminishes, buried under the pettiness alnd length to which they and their supporters, surrogates and mouthpieces are willing to go to get a nomination…..sad….

Audy   April 24th, 2008 1:36 pm ET

I think Richardson is pathetic. I have been in many a chat room and out into the community and they people who are the rudest are the Obama supporters who are claiming the whites are racist. I don't understand where he gets off with this line of attack. If a Clinton supporter says something we demonize them, but if an Obama supporter says something it's the word of God. I tell you what if there was ever more of a Bias in this country I've never seen it, and I hope after this is over everyone realizes the truth! I can't believe I am actually still in the democratic party. I will tell you one thing though… after the treatment Obama supporters have given me I don't think I will ever support him!

c   April 24th, 2008 1:35 pm ET

mike in va….they probably got their education same as everyone else,our shotty education system. been this way for years,just takes some to leave school and realize how bad and wrong it was.

Independent   April 24th, 2008 1:35 pm ET

Seriously, Carville scares the CRAP out of me. I find him even scarier than Hillary.

GG   April 24th, 2008 1:35 pm ET

I watched him on Larry King… The man (the Gov) needs help. There's no other way to describe Gov. Richardson than to say SEXIST.

Gov, this question is for you. Do you wish you could have made it this far, instaed of Hillary?

I still think you are let down..

By the way, there's no throne. People vote here.

K   April 24th, 2008 1:34 pm ET

Mike in Virginia,
Amen! I think "Urban" was left off the moniker…

Anthony-Minneapolis,MN   April 24th, 2008 1:33 pm ET

Richardson is right but I would one up him further, I believe the Clintons intend to steal the nomination or the minimum hurt Obama so badly and give Republicans ammunition against Obama. She is acting like a spoiled child how decides to take her ball home and cry because she isn't getting her way.

I believe you can no longer have a rational discussion with Hillary Clinton supporters because I believe they are to ignorant, to uneducated to understand something as complex as if you don't beat Obama in the last 10 primaries by a margin of 65% to 35% you can even get close to his numbers to say this should go to the convention.

Caledonia, NY   April 24th, 2008 1:33 pm ET

I hate Carville but I also love the guy. Richardson is a backstabber of epic proportions. Obama seems to me to be the Anti-Christ. A smooth talker that can move thousands of people to tears without saying much at all. I respect Hillary for sticking to her guns and fighting hard to win the nomination, even when people like Richardson are telling her to give it up.

Obama mama   April 24th, 2008 1:33 pm ET

Its funny to me that former members of Bill Clinton's administration are supposed to back Hillary just because. Richardson doesn't owe Hillary anything. He was appointed to a post and served Bill. That's it. Has he forever given loyalty to any Clinton that does anything? He's right– he ran against Hillary and nobody was offended. They're just mad. Maybe her feelings are hurt. I'm suprised she didn't cry before Pennsylvania like New Hampshire…

James Carville won't say why he's only upset with Richardson. There have been other Clinton defectors, but James is still so upset by Richardson. That's more interesting to me…

get real   April 24th, 2008 1:33 pm ET

Go away Judas! Has Obama offerred you the VP spot or what? Obama still couldn't win the latino vote with you on the ticket. Do you know why? I think it has something to do with Latinos being tired of Blacks accusing them of taking their jobs.

Good luck Obama winning that vote even if Richardson is on your ticket!!!

mad dem   April 24th, 2008 1:32 pm ET

I am also from Florida. When I voted in the primary, it was with the understanding that the vote would not count because my state broke the rules of the DNC. I think Florida and Michigan should not be counted. Rules are there for a reason. If you decide to break a rule, be prepared to suffer the backlash. Florida should stop being in the middle of everything and know that our state government knew the rules as well. Obama and Clinton both signed off on the rules. I think this should be a dead issue. And for all fairness Florida nor Michigan should not even want to have their votes counted. Yea, send the wrong message to the kids, if you break a rule, instead of being punished we will make exceptions. I am very disappointed in my state. Be strong and take your punishment like adults.

nord   April 24th, 2008 1:32 pm ET

Richardson is a has-been and because he is backing Obama and going against the will of the voters in New Mexico, he will not be relected next time. Keep looking for that new home in Texas cause the folks in New Mexico are about to kick your butt to the curb. .

Richardson would be washing dishes today if it wern't for the Clintons who made him what he is today. JUDAS is to kind of a word to place on him, I can think ofa lot of more appropriate adjatives to call him.

John Smith   April 24th, 2008 1:31 pm ET

I guess "folks" in small towns and states are "smarter and more educated" than folks in the BIG states!! Hillary is from NY–

NY, PA, FL, CA etc. (except TX), continue to amaze us! Just look at the "wisdom" of the smaller states– Indianna, NC, Iowa etc.– . Left to them, this madness would have been over with before now!!

shirley   April 24th, 2008 1:31 pm ET

Those people who say Senator Obama disenfranchised Florida and Michigan voters are sounding like idiots. The DNC made that decision, Hillarys said it is Obama fault, the media prints her lie and now some of you actually believe it.

ROBERT   April 24th, 2008 1:30 pm ET

I find it funny that people say that Hillary will do anything to become the first woman president. Isn't that what Obama is doing? He wants to go into the history books as the first black president. I know Michelle Obama would like to be the first black female president….why else would she pushing Obama so hard. I personally don't have anything against him. I just don't think he has what it takes. He's a junior senator with no track record behind him and I don't like the way he is playing to the black community. As I see it right now it's race against gender.

Sue   April 24th, 2008 1:30 pm ET

James Carville is a spin nut. The Clinton are be beaten by the American people not Obama, he is just driving the train for change.

bob   April 24th, 2008 1:30 pm ET

AND OBAMA ACTS LIKE HE IS ENTITLED TO BE

THE WORLD LEADER….HIS ARROGANCE IS OBVIOUS

AND ONLY 3 YEARS IN US SENATE….SCARED OF THAT!!!!

Jan in Virginia   April 24th, 2008 1:29 pm ET

Tessa,

Is that who you really are or are you a plant pretending to change your support from Clinton?

Did it ever occur to you that maybe Clinton is doing this because she believes that she is the best candidate for the party and that her supporters are encouraging her to keep on. I believe she is the better candidate. I wil never vote for Obama and there is a large percentage of the Clinton support that won't either if he gets the nomination. That's a fact if you just read the news.

She's not destroying anything and people that tell you that are just people that want her out so Obama can have it.

Carl LaFerney   April 24th, 2008 1:29 pm ET

For someone young and educated, you have no manners and no respect for anyone other than people that agree with you it appears.

I find that appaling and shame on you and your attitude.

Even at 26, I'm well aware of how social security won't be around when I retire, so I must rely on two things: myself, OR, my government to take care of me.

I choose myself everytime because I trust myself. The government is a last resort, not a first one. This is why a MAJORITY of people over 40 will not vote for Obama, because they know what his future tax plans will do to their retirement funds.

Obama may bring necessary changes needed to improve our country, but people against him feel that he can do far more harm than good to this nation. It's as simple as that.

I applaud your support, but we simply disagree. It has nothing to do with education or age or anything for that matter…

shirley   April 24th, 2008 1:28 pm ET

Governor Richardson, an honest man of integrity, is called a 'traitor' for voting his conscience instead of 'political payback' , this says a lot about the Clintons. The news media smoothed this comment over the same way they have smoothed over Hillary's support of NAFTA and the Columbian Trade Deal and Hillary saying 'screw 'em' in reference to Southern voters. That comment has been verified and yet received 1 little blurb in the news while Senator Obama's 'bitter' word in describing the feelings of some American voter's got 5 days of front page news, all negative. Guess what? I am becoming very 'bitter' about this bias reporting.

Barbara   April 24th, 2008 1:28 pm ET

That is a lot of Bull, did I hear you say the Obama campaign make negative remarks? what or who have been listening to? Clinton is a Negative person, and of all people, try to use dirt, but then, look at her background. Anyone who stays with a man, who not in his own house, but our house (The White House) have sex with an intern young enough to be his daughter, and stand up and lie to the American people is bad enough but to do sucha thing is downright
dirty, and sick and what that says to us the american people screw you, "In your face" and then have the audacity to talk about a man about his minister, not the man, and just what standards are these
Clintons trying to hold Obama to and the pitiful people that vote for them. i feel so sorry for america if that is all they can produce,I will
not vote at all

Sarah in TX   April 24th, 2008 1:28 pm ET

Obama negative? did you watch the ABC debate? How many times did he get negative vs her? did you see the last commercial Hillary put out in PA? Why not show the great accomplishments of past presidents… why show pearl harbor/osama etc.?

Clintons push the OLD button push the OLD button push the OLD button
Obama deflects and then pushes back at the end and the Clintons say "see, it's him!! no fair, whaaaa =("

Is he negative b/c of the "bitter" comments? is that it? are you even in touch with America? lots of us are bitter… old politicians haven't lifted a finger for us and we can't go anywhere in the world without being looked down upon… let alone inflation, gas prices, war etc. etc. We are bitter and optimistic that with the right president things can change – not same old politicians and politics that never changes anything.

Patty-California   April 24th, 2008 1:28 pm ET

The remaining states should have the opportunity to vote in a democratic primary for the candidate of their choice. Also, more debates between the two candidates could help those undecided voters.

NY   April 24th, 2008 1:27 pm ET

Bill Richardson is just seeking for VP position which he will never get he has missed his opportunity and as they say, Opportunity comes but once. Had it been that Obama won in PA the tune will change that he is able to win in the big states. But now that Hillary is showing that is best, better and good leadership, Obama camp is crying like a baby. After all Obama said that he is having problem with the seniors the reason is because he doesn't respect seniors and that is why he is having problems with seniors. As you all can see Obama is very arrogant and kioki towards every one unless those Black voters who thing just because he is black all black people should vote for him.

Another thing is that leaders are naturally born and some are leaders and some followers. To me I believe Obama is a follower and not a leader. He may be handsome but if your parents are mixed like him definitely he/she will be handsome/beautiful. As you all know Catholics put George Bush in the White House and for the first time Catholics voted for Hillary that to show you people she is better candidate to help the country.

Also, black people should ask themselves a question if Obama is big in black community and past leaders why wasn't him at Martin Luther King memory service? See to show his arrogancy too big to attend.
All I can say, he should look for a VP position or gather more experience before looking for the highest job in the world. No one will hire a freshman to head his/her company take Dow Jones for example they will never ever take someone with MBA to be a CEO or handle their most strategic position.

Go Hillary '08

running away   April 24th, 2008 1:27 pm ET

CNN,

Carville is right. Obama is running away from debates and a re-vote. Whatever Richardson talked didn't appeal to me as logic. Obama is scared of re-vote. He knows that he is going to loose. We don't want a president who is scared and running away from things.

Whiney   April 24th, 2008 1:27 pm ET

Ohhh, little Obama is afraid of the big bad wolfe. Hillary is making him uncomforable. Well, he has not seen anything yet if he becomes the nominee.

I do not view her ads as negative – I veiw them as part of a campaign where she is trying to win and has every right to bring up ads that will make people think about the past, present and future and who could best handle the world's problems. She is strong and he is weak.

Independent-woman-voter-for-Obama   April 24th, 2008 1:26 pm ET

Roger: The Clintons THREW THE FIRST STONES. The Obama campaign has had no other choice but to defend and attack back or risk looking like wimps. Its pathetic that attacking and destroying your opponent IS the only way to win in our country! This says a lot about how we have been influenced by the AM Radio hate-mongers. Can we rise above all the mud???

Poor James Carville, his face says it all, "I am one mean & anger dude." James, you claim to be a Catholic, a Christian. How about some grace?

PS. Roger, in South Carolina it was Bill who FIRST played the race card. Its been downhill ever since.

Eric-Illinois   April 24th, 2008 1:26 pm ET

Richardson you are so sad. "Cling to the throne?" Obama is the one who seems to fell this nomination should just be annointed on him….him being the new Messiah and all. Your disloyalty is breathtaking…I am so so very sorry I once thought of voting for you. What job did Obama and his Chicago hacks promise you to make you turn your back on experience and skills in favor of snappy speaches and feel good silliness?

Kathy   April 24th, 2008 1:25 pm ET

Thank goodness Richardson dropped out of the race!

mad dem   April 24th, 2008 1:25 pm ET

I don't want to see another debate if it is not going to focus on issues. I don't care about their personal business, such as where they worship or who they have had so called "contact" with. I want to know what each one plans to do about: Economy, Gas prices, Education(making school districts more accountable, not just testing)(college more affordable for kids who parents pay taxes), Health Care (for everyone and the price of insurance, medications), Housing( So we will not have so many Americans homeless) AND Crime( So our kids can stay safe). I have real concerns, because I have children who must grow up in this great nation. I can't even watch Ms. Clinton, because she is very negative. It was not long ago, that we defended her husband against those who wanted to impeach him because of his personal life. Did we ever get a conclusion to Whitewater? Obama has yet to come out swinging her dirt and I say good for him and staying out of the norm of politics. I think debates can only get ugly, if our dear media friends keep taking us back to things that are not important. STAY FOCUS AMERICA

TGO in CT   April 24th, 2008 1:25 pm ET

I have to commend Bill Richardson for voting the way he feels led. Personally, I think Carville was way out of line with his remarks… Just because Richarson has his own mind and is not afraid to express his choice?… Isn"t that one of our constitutional rights???
I didn't hear Bill Richardson calling names…. To me, that only shows who the more professional person was…With supporters like Carville, I can see why Hillary is behind and will never get the nomination…

BAKERSFIELD   April 24th, 2008 1:25 pm ET

RICHARDSON KNOWS HE BACK STABB THEM, ALL THEY DID TO HELP HIS POLITICAL FUTURE – HE CAN'T BE TRUSTED.

leicheco   April 24th, 2008 1:24 pm ET

How can anyone be upset because Richardson backed Obama?
Just because he worked with the Clintons at one time does not entitle the Clintons to his support. He admits that the Clintons have done alot for him, but he does not own them his pledge! Come on people this is the future of America we are talking about, maybe he knows something about the Clintons that we don't, and he just does not want the dynasty to go on. We have already had to many years of the Clintons and the Bushs. I hope that we can end it now…..has anyone noticed that HRC showes signs of being a female Bush?

Mike in Virginia   April 24th, 2008 1:24 pm ET

"The Young & Educated for Obama",

Sir/Mam,

Please, please, PLEASE tell me where you received your education. With sentence structure like yours, I would like to ensure that I do not send my children there.

Thanking you in advance,

Mike

Andrew from PA   April 24th, 2008 1:23 pm ET

Richardson has no leg to stand on. He and the Clintons go way back and for him to betray them for his own personal gain was just a back stabbing move. If he had waited to endorse, he'd be picking Hillary right now because she's making the big news. Now he's trying to get his guy back into the race, because suddenly that cabinent seat is starting to look out of reach.

Its all politics, and he's just the guy trying to get left overs from the king / queen.

CW4Barak   April 24th, 2008 1:23 pm ET

Bottom line is the only candidate running now who is fresh and new and offering something different, real change–is Obama. Clinton is not only running on her husband's record, but also for his 3rd term….McCain is running for Bushes 3rd. By the way Jeremiah Wright is a better man and American than a lot of the people who are judging him. Bill Ayers wasn't convicted of anything. Obama did nothing illegal with Rezko. Michelle Obama has a right to her feelings and comments…if its the 1st time she is proud of her country, then that's how she feels, doesn't mean that's how Obama feels….even though they are married they don't share the same brain or mind, had separate up bringings and exposure. Clinton & McCain are the real elistist…they are just great pretenders!

Jeanne   April 24th, 2008 1:23 pm ET

Clinton backers are free to make up their own minds. Richardson made his decision. Others are free to do the same. No one should be criticized for who they support.

They still need to figure out how they're going to handle Michigan & Florida. It's pretty clear that there's going to be no decisive victory for either candidate and Michigan & Florida have to be represented somehow. McCain is already using it as fodder for his campaign.

It's doubtful the DNC will ever get organized enough to make a responsible decision and the Democrats are likely to be fighting about it all the way through to the convention & beyond.

Geri   April 24th, 2008 1:22 pm ET

I thought Richardson was obnoxious and maybe a little bitter that he didn't make it. I was hoping for him or Biden but am very happy now that he dropped out..

kayla   April 24th, 2008 1:22 pm ET

i don't think Obama should have anymore debates with Hillary. all she wants to do is attack him like a pitbull like she is

RichardC   April 24th, 2008 1:22 pm ET

roger- the voters do have a choice, its called Obama vs McCain in the fall. Hillary can't win, under any circumstances, except coup by superdelegates, or Obama falls under a bus. Her campaign is trying to rationalize their continued existence, but they're just helping McCain too much. Is she an (R) now?

People are eager to get rid of Bush, but don't confuse that with with a need to vote in this primary. The primary is over, Obama won. Now people need to accept that, get behind him, and take out McCain.

Since we are where we are, I say let them vote in 2 weeks at Indiana and SC, but the superdelegates should step in after that and end it. Since Obama will only be about 180 delegates short and Clinton about 350 short, they should give it to Obama and lets be done with this.

GloriafromPA   April 24th, 2008 1:21 pm ET

I watched the entire show last night and found Richardson to be on point, while Carville was clearly desperate for Hillary. Seems, now, the person who wins IN should be the nominee. I thought we were just going to disenfranchise all the caucus states from the popular count, and include the two states who lost the privelege to be counted in the process. Yes, that sound fair, in a Clintoneque sort of way. We will be a strong party after Hillary has finally given her concesion speach. We will hear from all the states – then it's buh-bye Hillary.

Very Disappointing   April 24th, 2008 1:21 pm ET

I used to like this guy….he seems backwards. Funny how he says he will support him, but calls his supporters names. Weird and contrasting. Just polarizing at the best with much spin.

Robert in Albuquerque   April 24th, 2008 1:21 pm ET

Being a voter in NM I have to say if it wasn't for that Clinton dynasty, you Mr. Richardson wouldn't be where you are today. You've lost my vote and more over, my respect.

George   April 24th, 2008 1:20 pm ET

Carville is a spin doctor, a good one, but those who spin the "truth" are what is wrong with our politcal system. Politicians usually don't say what they mean and rarely come out with a straight forward answer. I think Richardson won this round as he came over as being more sincere. I think the fact that Hillary's camp, Carville being the talking head for it, want Michigan and Florida to count only because they won. Obama wasn't even on the ballot and didn't campaign there. If Clinton had loss those states I think she would be speaking another tune. I think Obama should be the nominee with Hillary right there as VP. Then if she does a good job as VP, then she can be President as she would then have experience. Stop the phony talk and negative bashing and unite the country not just the Dem. party.

Dylan   April 24th, 2008 1:20 pm ET

Well said, Gov. Richardson. So glad you picked the right candidate to represent your party.

I have lost all respect for Mr. Carville.

Ignore Carville 2008   April 24th, 2008 1:20 pm ET

Why can't Jimmy just go off quietly into the sunset? His relevence card was played about 10 years ago. He doesn't have any others.

Eye Opener - Las Vegas   April 24th, 2008 1:19 pm ET

I am baffled by the comments of Governor Richardson alluding to the Clintons with words like "Dynasty" and "Throne".

In all seriousness, does the governor hate the Clintons so much that he denigrates Senator Clinton's quest for the presidency as monarchial and dynastic? While the governor is entitled to his opinion that Senator Obama is the better candidate for him, it is hypocritical for him that his decision to support Senator Obama was brought about by the negativity of the Clinton campaign. As a politician himself, he is well aware that political campaigning is a contact sport and negativity as well as distortion of facts are on both sides. ALL politician/candidates, Governor Richardson included, do what they must to earn votes and win – this is a fact.

Governor Richardson should stick to his own advice that people should choose their next president based on facts and solutions being offered by the candidates and more importantly, who is best qualified to lead the country and steer it in the right direction – not on negative campaigning and accusing your opponent of monarchial and dynastic ambitions.

Garret, Los Angeles   April 24th, 2008 1:19 pm ET

We are not clinging to the throne. We are voting for the best candidate. We have had enough of change. We changed from paying $2.35 cents per gallon of gas to $3.97 cents. That's enough change for me.

Hillary 2008 and 2012.

Voter for Hillary   April 24th, 2008 1:19 pm ET

Um, young and educated–that wasn't Hhillary's campaign that put up that picture of obama in a turban–it was an independent group. Hillary actually condemmed it.

Obama is the one that made the "bitter" and "clinging" to guns comments. It was not broke by the Clinton campaign, but by a person in the media who happened to be in the audience.

dabrain   April 24th, 2008 1:19 pm ET

Richardson is not "bitter" towards the Clintons. That's a foolish comment. They appointed him because of his credentials. He is free to support whosoever he wants to support!!!! He is an American and enjoys the same rights as everyone else. Moreover, Barack Obama was responsible (and everyone knows that) for registering many new voters (especially in the African American community) in Illinois when he was a community organizer, so that Bill Clinton could go on to win the state. So would you say then, that the Clintons owe Obama as well? And “Roger,” no one is saying that the States that have not had their primary should not!! Each camp agrees on that. Carville was insinuating that the Obama camp doesn't want those primaries to happen! That was pure spin! — and you bought it because of your bias!!! And if you were paying close attention to the campaign you would realize that 90% of Obama's responses were to refute the negative attacks by the Clintons. The backlash that would happen if a black man (Obama) offends or is a bit rough with a white woman (Hillary) would cause some loss of the white vote (remember New Hampshire). I think that he has been pretty composed in the way he has responded even at debates. I don't know if I would have been the same since I have no patience for nonsense. I would have called it just that like I am calling your comments!! NONSENSE!

Gloria   April 24th, 2008 1:19 pm ET

My opinion of Governor Richardson has surely changed after hearing his remarks. Carville shouldn't have called him a Judas during the Easter season. We don't have Kings or Queens in our country, Governor although George Bush has been acting like a king during his administration. Does Richardson want to exclude Michigan and Florida from the General Election also? The people in these two states want their votes counted as they should be. Obama wasn't on the Ballot in Michigan by his own choice, he had his name removed, he didn't have to do that. I still believe in Government OF the people, BY the people and FOR the people. ALL the people, not just SOME of the people.

Olga, CA   April 24th, 2008 1:18 pm ET

People,

Let everybody know what you think. Otherwise, the Clinton campaign is going to steal the nomination. Way to go, governor Richardson! One decent person!

Rebecca   April 24th, 2008 1:18 pm ET

What does the United States call other countries who change their rules in the middle of an election to favor a particular canidate. Corrupt. That is exactly what Hillary Clinton and her team want to do. Change the rules in the middle of an election. According to the official rules this election is finished and Obama is the winner. Therefore, no more need for another debate so they can team up on Obama 3 to 1 again.

I know Hillary won't quit until she is knocked out all the way, so Obama please knock her out. Give her a good solid knock out punch that lands her sprawling on the ground. Then give her a couple of good kicks to make sure she doesn't get back up. We're getting sick of her and her buddies nasty mouths.

Jen in PA   April 24th, 2008 1:18 pm ET

“You think those parking spaces off the West Wing are yours, but they belong to the American people, and you have to earn the right to use them.”

~Bill Clinton, "My Life", in response to the Republicans telling him not to run in 1992.

Oh, the irony…

Fay (the Young Texan who voted for Obama)   April 24th, 2008 1:18 pm ET

Richardson is only bitter against the Clintons because they threw him under the bus when he didn't bow down to King and Queen Clinton. Like I said the other day (and I still believe), you have to be smoking serious hash to vote for that woman. I'm 23 and all my friends agree on one thing. If she somehow nickels and dimes her way to the general election, she's lost most of the African American and young vote. Where will that leave her? Hmmmm….

cc, Chicago   April 24th, 2008 1:17 pm ET

This is alot of smoke. The negative campaigning was initiated by the Clinton camp and the Obama camp while being negative at times has been more reactionary in that they responded to negative attacks by Clinton. It's part of their stated strategy to trap Obama in his high road pledge.

Frankly, right now all 3 candidates are disappointing. They had 6 weeks before the Pennsylvania primary to go to Washington and do some work. Don't tell us what you would do as President. You are a sitting senator. Why not prove it by proposing legislation? It's not like any of the candidates are state Governor's and therefore outside Washington's legislature and can only talk in theory. How bad would HRC look if Obama answered her negative attacks with legislation to deal with the economic issues we're facing? And how much would HRC enforce her "ready on Day 1″ argument if she proposed legislation rather than negatively attacking Obama? For McCain, he's got a golden opportunity to be seen doing something by proposing legislation while the democrats beat each other up. They all talk about change. It's time they start walking the walk.

AMG   April 24th, 2008 1:17 pm ET

Excellent points Carville. Richardson looked stupid and without valid arguments that is why he resorted to talk about "dynasties". He is truly a Judas.

Who Let Carville Out   April 24th, 2008 1:16 pm ET

Carville and his Judas remarks need to crawl back under that rock he slithered out from. Richardson is a man of honor and character who had the guts to stand up to the Clintons and he cerrtainly didn't deserve that comment.

Hillary is running around saying that the PLEDGED DELEGATES are not bound to anyone now and trying to get them to go against the popular vote she so desperately is trying to claim. We know that Super Delegates have latitude…that is unless you go against the Clintons.

Annamica, OH   April 24th, 2008 1:16 pm ET

Richardson is vying for a spot in the cabinet again…he will do whatever it takes, even if it means saying such hateful things about the people who helped him. There is no loyalty in politics, and Richardson is a prime example. Obama is still party to "the politics of the past" as he puts it.

John, Brooklyn, NY   April 24th, 2008 1:15 pm ET

If the Clinton campaign is genuine in saying that both Barak and Hillary are strong, viable candidates and that, at the end of the day, it is both side's highest priority that a Democrat win in November, then Richardson's decision to support Obama certainly doesn't rise to the scale of "betrayal" that Carville has portrayed.

This kind of you're-either-with-me-or-against-me rhetoric from the Clinton camp exactly reflects the kind of divisive, partisan, angry, and mean-spirited politics that the American people are tired of. James Carville, Geraldine Ferraro, Robert Johnson (to name just a few) – through both their absurdly hostile statements and their brittle defensiveness – help DEFINE the kind of politics that Obama pledged to bring to an end.

Alonzo Demetrius   April 24th, 2008 1:15 pm ET

Wow! When Carville gets mad, watch out!

Texas Guy   April 24th, 2008 1:15 pm ET

I saw this….and Carville epitomizes what the Clintons stand for: An old politics built on chameleon-like rhetoric and win at any costs.

Even the Republican McCain has run a more decent/fair campaign.

akaDoug   April 24th, 2008 1:15 pm ET

Richardson is right! The Clinton's are acting like they deserve this nomination, instead of trying to earn it! Clinging to the throne is such a perfect line! God Bless people like Richardson that have the courage to look outside the system and pick who they feel is best qualified, instead of blindly following the status quo!

End the drama, vote Obama!

JUNIOR   April 24th, 2008 1:15 pm ET

RICHARDSON IS RIGHT! I RESPECT HIM FOR STANDINDING FOR THE RIGHT THINGS AND ISSUES.AND NOT JUST STICK TO THE CLINTONS BECAUSE HE WORKED WITH THEM.TIME HAS CHANGED,SO HAS CHOICES OF WHAT CAN IMPROVE THE SITUATION IN AMERICA!HE KNOWS HOW OLD WASHINGTON POLITICS WITH THIER LOBBYST WORK.SO HE CHOSE A SMARTER AND DELIGENT CANDIDATE ON BEHALF OF AMERICA! NOW ARE NEW APPROACHES NOT OLD GAME!!!

Venus   April 24th, 2008 1:14 pm ET

YES! Hillary – take Carville and Bill and pack it up! This is over!

Hillary you needed to win Penn-State by 64%! And, now to stay in this race you will need to win the rest of the states by 68% and you need a lot of money!

So much for you clinging to throne! I bet you feel bitter now!

Carville needs a cave to live in! He was NASTY toward Richardson on Larry King!

Welcome Mr. President Obama!!!!!!!!!!

Brian (in PA)   April 24th, 2008 1:14 pm ET

Sounds like sour grapes from Richardson.

Felly   April 24th, 2008 1:14 pm ET

The Clintons are polarizing. No more Bush-Clinton, Bush-Clinton dynasty, period.

Obama Voter 08   April 24th, 2008 1:14 pm ET

Most of the old Clinton regime have turned against them big time. Doesn't anybody bother to ask why? There has got to be a reason why they are all jumping ship, they are not all crazy or 'Judas's' as that hillbilly Carville makes them seem. Maybe like most of america they know the Clintons and don't like their evil ways.

Steve in California   April 24th, 2008 1:13 pm ET

Carrville's counter to Richardson's "throne" comment was correct. People are voting in an election. No one is clinging to a throne. Why did Obama suppress the Florida/Michigan revote? We're a democracy. Many Democrats will not recognize the legitimacy of an Obama nomination without a valid vote in Florida and Michigan.

Rj   April 24th, 2008 1:13 pm ET

Carville is absolutely right! There are many Judas in the Democratic Party nowadays… They should all be hanged!

These so called LEADERS that should set good example of loyalty to their constituents are Blatantly betraying them. SHAME ON THEM!!!

These Elders are asking their supporters to support them but have different standard in supporting their constituents. SHAME ON YOU!!!

DNC Traitors & Judases:(Voted against the will of their Constituents)
Ted Kennedy
John Kerry
Nancy Pelosi
Bill Richardson
Gov. Henry

***Will you join them????*** SHAME ON THEM!!!

Getting tired of this   April 24th, 2008 1:13 pm ET

I saw the show too and had an entirely different view of it. I thought Carville came across like a school child and Richardson came across as a senior political leader who resents the Clinton view that they somehow own him just because they once gave him a job.

And his comments that the Clintons are trying to hold on to the throne is very much in line with what many many people believe. HRC's air of entitlement from the beginning of this campaign has been palpable. It found its manifestation in her decision to ignore small states, her contention that the race would be over by Feb 5, and her spending habits, which were pegged to the "close this out early" arrogance. And it is a big reason why she is losing now.

rose, texas   April 24th, 2008 1:12 pm ET

people like richardson r traders. if he had made it in the race i know i would not b voting 4 him. the only reason that he endoresed obama is because he thinks he will b one of the cabinet members. that is why hillary has 2 win .. go hillary go…….

bigben   April 24th, 2008 1:11 pm ET

He is mad because his endorsement meant nothing

katharyn   April 24th, 2008 1:10 pm ET

I feel that Richardson was right stating that Clintons are like "dynasty" and I believe that most ( maybe not all people) who support Hillary are supporting her because they are too afraid of losing their jobs or status…or because they feel that they "owe" her allegance.

Joseph Adewole   April 24th, 2008 1:10 pm ET

I wonder why Clinton supporters are like the Clintons; Richardson has done the right thing, some of Clinton supporters don't even have conscience..think of what is right and do it not looking unto anyone to make up your own mind.

Mike   April 24th, 2008 1:09 pm ET

What ever one has to be thinking about right know is why are conservatives supporting clintons? Next why are the clintons running a campaign that is inline with what the GOP runs? Who is for the people I am tried of hearing that the clintons help someone out so that person most back the clintons. I am joining a big percentage of Americans that if the clintons get the nomination without leading in states, votes, and delegates, its republican all the way. Michigan and Florida broke the rules lets show the younger generation that if you brake the rules you get punished plus Michigan did not have everyone on the ballot and still the clintons could not win big.

Thomas   April 24th, 2008 1:09 pm ET

Puh-leeze.

Carville is a paid mouthpiece who has been riding the Clinton coattails since 1990, when Bill started his run for the presidency.

Richardson is a man who has earned his own way in this world. Yes, Clinton appointed him to positions but it was on his own merit.
Bill Clinton did not make Bill Richardson the man he is. He did it all on his own.

Richardson has ever right to be bitter towards the Clintons for the way they have acted. They acted like they were entitled to and owned his vote and endorsement.

Ernest   April 24th, 2008 1:09 pm ET

Roger and Toronto girl, I think that you are missing the point. We are talking about the future and not the past. Gov. Richardson is right and an honest man.

Shawn   April 24th, 2008 1:09 pm ET

Richardson has shot himself in the foot. It's not nice to play so nice with the Clintons all these years and then stab them in the back. So much for loyalty.

Marc   April 24th, 2008 1:08 pm ET

It must eat up Richardson inside to know that his lame endorsement didn't help Obama at all in PA. In reality, all he did was alienate himself from the hispanic community.

tonybama   April 24th, 2008 1:08 pm ET

Carville`s response is typical of the Clinton camp, extreme bitterness toward anyone who doesn't support them. So many Clinton supporters are so hateful of Obama. if you really think about it, whats to hate about him. His views are pretty similar on most issues to hers. Most of his negative campaigning is in response to hers, and the Clintons have repeatedly said that negative campaigning is a necessary part of politics. Maybe someone from their side can fill me in as to the reason for this intense hatred.

I see it from the Obama side as well, but its been after the kitchen sink strategy and Tanya Harding strategy were implemented, and doesn't seem as widespread.

By the way, is Hillary going to denounce the latest North Carolina Republican attack ad. If not, this should cause her great harm within her own party. You can't keep trying to run as a Republican.

Toronto Guy   April 24th, 2008 1:08 pm ET

Richardson's is doing the right thing in helping the coutry instead of helping a family. He knows that Obama is the better candidate and the better candidate should win! thats the criteria. you should not vote for the candidate that helped you in the past.

Betty   April 24th, 2008 1:07 pm ET

One thing I noticed when watching this last night was that yes Bill R is very bitter toward the Clintons and that he was extremely nrveous he kept moving around in his chair biting at the corner of his lip eyes were blinking 60 miles an hour
He was not comfortable in his appearance at all
He supported BO oh well but why does he feel the need to go out and bash the Clintons every chance he gets??
Is that considered negative?
Bill R refused to respond to why BO refuses the revote in Mich and FL when people had offered to pay for it
Of course he did have to say why should BO do a debate after he was attacked at the last one OMG
He is concerned that BO will fall on his face the way he did the last time
BO has him by the neck and it shows
All the print of Hillary attacking Hillary going neg has any body seen the clips of his stumps or the ads he puts out or is it racist to comment on BOs negativity?
I thought at one time Bill R was an ok guy but after the last few weeks -He is just a pansy little creep
Does Bill R get it that when Bo bashes Bill Cs years in office he is bashing him as well??
Bill R keeps pounding on his years of service well according to BO they werent worth any thing!
So BO thinks Bill R is as dumb as the rest of us typical white people

ajks   April 24th, 2008 1:07 pm ET

Carville has stated before that "the Michigan and Florida votes not being counted is like stopping a ballgame in the third quarter." I say that when everybody knows the rules before the ballgame starts you do not change the rules after three-quarters of a game. He seems to think Clinton deserves the nomination as "her" right–no matter how many rules they have to change.

Ed in GA   April 24th, 2008 1:07 pm ET

I feel that the Clintons was helped more by the Richardson cabinet appointment since he helped them cultivate and solidify a Latino base that Hillary is still enjoying now. The thought of him owing them something is laughable to the highest decible.

Steven   April 24th, 2008 1:07 pm ET

Having seen this show, I was disgusted with Richardson. He is obviously personally very angry at the Clintons, and this anger is clouding his judgment about what is best for the country. He sounds like a child who is going to take his toys and go home. Very disappointing.

Tim   April 24th, 2008 1:06 pm ET

Obviously growing facial hair makes one loose their intellect.

Stacy G.   April 24th, 2008 1:06 pm ET

In Your Dreams, Toronto Girl! I saw this episode as well, and Governor Richardson is NOT AT ALL BITTER. The Clintons, as well as their supporters, including James Carville, who is an idiot! are the one's who are bitter!

Governor Richardson owes nothing to the Clintons, every position he held with that administration, HE EARNED! He did a great job in the process. No one owes anything to their employers, past or present other than to do the job, they are being paid to do!

There are also numerous other people working in Senator Obama's campagn who were with the Clinton Administration as well, so that should tell you something about the Clintons. Or perhaps you have been under sniper fire, with Hillary Clinton, in her delusionary world as well!

I say Bravo!, to Governor Richardson for taking a stand for a candidate and a movement he sincerely believes in, as well as all the other elected officials who have come out in endorsement, and support of Senator Obama.

Bill   April 24th, 2008 1:06 pm ET

Carville represents the dark side of American politics. In 1996, when Bob Dole, a man who had volunteered for combat when he could have gotten a deferment and then was nearly blown in half trying to rescue a fallen comrade, challenged then First Lady Hillary Clinton's notion that "it takes a village" to raise a child, Carville called him a liar.

Now Carville pointedly ignores white and African American Democratic leaders supporting Senator Obama and kicks the most prominent Latino politician in America to the curb. I guess the Clinton campaign wasn't content with alienating African Americans.

kayla   April 24th, 2008 1:06 pm ET

atleast he's not a puppet to the clinton's like carville

Darlene   April 24th, 2008 1:06 pm ET

I felt Richardson's sincerity in why he endorsed Obama. I think in the beginning didn't think Hillary would be a bad President he just thought Obama would be better to bring about the famous "CHANGE". However, Richardson has now been bashed for his decision to join Obama almost as much as Obama has for Rev. Wright, which I could tell was starting to leave that bad sour Clinton taste in his mouth.

Very eloquently he pointed out that some like Carville are more interested in the Clintons taking over the party again than the actually Presidency or the good of the Democratic Party.

It is all about the Clintons and their faithful followers and their attitude of entitlement at all cost.

Cynthia   April 24th, 2008 1:06 pm ET

Bill Richardson said in the interview on Larry King Live that all states should be able to vote. I do believe that the negativity is dividing the Democratic party. One important thing that was said in the Presidential race when Bill Richardson was still a candidate – that all candidates had agreed that Michigan and FLorida would not be counted because they did not follow the rules set by the DNC.

Info   April 24th, 2008 1:05 pm ET

Carville is a bitter old man

Dave, California   April 24th, 2008 1:05 pm ET

You know things are bad for the party when democrats start insulting and abandoning Bill Clinton's presidency. Interesting how it took another democrat for them to see what the republicans knew all along.

Tim   April 24th, 2008 1:05 pm ET

I think it was Richardson who once said "since when was it so bad for someone to have experience". Seems he doesn't really do what he means. I used to have a lot more respect…but like many of the elders in this party they think to highly of themselves. I'm a supporter of Clinton's not because I want a dynasty, but after listening to the input from her and Obama, I really believe she has the experience to do a great job. Obama gives great speeches…period.

Tex-gal   April 24th, 2008 1:05 pm ET

I believe Bill Richardson is not in tune with Democrats, we all have a different view of who we support and why. We can judge a candidate by his/her merits, actions, and policies, each one is advocating.

I support Hillary Clinton for president of the U.S. and I do not want to be influenced by Richardson, any super delegate, or the DNC. I was listening to one of Obama's campaign speeches and I clearly heard him say "I believe in some form of evolution". Pure existence is actuality, it can not be modified, a person is perfect in actuality. This country was established under the Judeo-Christian believes. You either believe in God, or you do not. I know this is a country of immigrants composed of many religions and believes,but when I heard this, I was completely astound. I will not vote for Obama. He would be a danger to this country.

Danny   April 24th, 2008 1:04 pm ET

Carville you are right take on. Look Richardson support Obama but he said Obama not going to win that's flip-flop like Obama and Kerry. McCain is Bush third term bad McCain better than Bush this is flip-flop
Mr. Obama and this is not a President of the United States. He doesn't place his hand over his heart in the presence of American flag this is not
a President of the United States people.

Hillary 08 President.

dwho   April 24th, 2008 1:04 pm ET

Bill Richardson is right Hillary Clinton backers like Carville, 'a dynasty' that is 'clinging to the throne'.

America's form of government is a Demoncratic system. Every American has a free will regardless of affiliations to vote for a CANDIDATE who he/she determined is capable to run this country.

But lame supporters like Carville think the White House is a throne that belongs to either the Clintons and Bush's familes or that should be owned by such families.

Such supporters tend to believe that the government should be OF THE BUSH'S FAMILY, BY THE CLINTONS' FAMILY AND FOR THE CLINTONS AND BUSH'S FAMILIES.

Such supporters think that every one should pay homage to the Clintons and Bush's families by saying HAIL THE KING'S FAMILIES or VOTE for the Royal FAMILies. A person who will not hail or vote for the royal families will be denigrated or ostracized

With such belief system the American people are just followers of the royal families in the eyes of such lame supporters.

Maria   April 24th, 2008 1:04 pm ET

Governor Richardson enforce the latino stereotype of "oportunismo"; he kept the nation in "suspense" while deciding which candidate was better for HIM, his career and political future.. going against his constituency and the interest of the latino community as a whole, that he as one of their leader should have always represented. The diversity of the latino community is their strenght and so far a majority has been united behind the candidacy of Sen. Clinton that better represents their concrete interests and also knows the socio-economic aspects of the countries of origin of latinos/as.
Latinos have a unique opportunity in this election to embrace the interesting moment in history to support a capable women as the leader of the most powerful nation in the world, "Less developed" latin-american countries have done it: Argentina, Chile, as well as important countries such as Germany.
What matters to latinos more than an “abstract change” is how the concrete programs offered by the candidates will impact their lives as part of an important minority group in the USA.

richard - Minneapolis   April 24th, 2008 1:04 pm ET

If you ever wanted to see a characterization of the race between Clinton and Obama, last night's "debate" between Carville and Richardson was it! James Carville, while declaring that he'd support Obama if he became the nominee, was steadily tearing Obama down, making pejorative comments about Bill Richardson, and demanding that FL's and MI's illegal votes be counted so his candidate, Hillary Clinton, could be declared the nominee. James Carville was arrogant and condescending, ranting, holding to the crazy point that the candidates should hold more and more debates (as if 21 aren't enough!) and refused to retract his "Judas" comments about Bill Richardson. (He declined to say why he refused to indict Robert Reich, another Clinton's Secretary of Labor, who also chooses to support Obama.)

Bill Richardson was civil, consistent and showed great integrity. He stated the obvious – that Hillary and Bill feel entitled and will pull (have pulled) every trick in the book to have their way at the peril of the whole democratic party.

Last night, James Carville epitomized Hillary Clinton's campaign: angry, demanding, condescending. Bill Richardson, fortunately, was the Obama image. I like Bill Richardson!

Obama '08!

Mat   April 24th, 2008 1:02 pm ET

Clinton makes the argument that Super Delegates should make their own choice, not on the popular vote. But when one of these SD makes a choice on who he or she thinks is best against their state and not for Clinton – her campaign freaks out!! It's one rule for her and another for others.

Carville is blowing smoke and spining crap. If Obama wins NC or IN then it's over – there is no way she can come back – I'm so sick of the Clinton campaign!!

Paris   April 24th, 2008 1:02 pm ET

Great show, Carville is right.
It is the primaries and candidates still need to EARN people’s votes.
They must answer more and more questions and have debates.
Wanting the debates to stop and call out the nominee when people are still Voting is more like “Clinging to the throne”!

Lee WV   April 24th, 2008 1:02 pm ET

Clinton is clinging to the experience issue and electability issues.No president that has ever been elected to a first term has had experience.First lady (or Second )whichever the case is is not experience.It's an insult to my intelligence to try to tell me that because 10% of voters or less in the so called big states liked her better than him that he cannot take the 45% that did and build on that and win these states against McCain.Richardson made a wise choice and many others to come will.Carville can vote McCain if he wants.

wonder   April 24th, 2008 1:02 pm ET

I watched the show too. Richardson was so anxious to talk and interrupted Carville a lot. I feel he's really in pain to face Carville. Why he cannot relax a little bitWhat Carville said is reasonable to me.

John WA   April 24th, 2008 1:02 pm ET

Richardson is a wise man. He served the President well. He owes nothing to the former presidents wife. In primaries all the states usually don't vote.Some people seem to not know the difference between a primary and a general election. Also, to say that a person would not win a state in the general because they lost the primary is not a valid arguement-especially if the results were close. Hillary is playing people for fools. She is very aware of how she spins this. Why do you think so many people that have known her for years are backing Obama?

TOOTIE   April 24th, 2008 1:01 pm ET

Richardson is a Judas, with friends like him who needs enimies?

Klaus from Vancouver   April 24th, 2008 1:00 pm ET

Enough of the debates! It's getting silly and trivial. Obama was right about the ABC debate. It took 45 minutes before actual issues important to country were discussed. He even decided not to go after Clinton on embelishing her heroism in Bosnia. He wants to take the high road. He wanted to disdcuss issues effecting the average American citizen and not lapel pins and gafs.

In the Presidential race, we'll be lucky to see four debates. So why should their be another in the Democratic primary, where we have already seen 20+/-? Because Clinton is looking for free advertisement and she is behind in the race. Her campaign is also broke. Hillary also likes to twist the knife into Obama on trivial issues and pretends she's Annie Oakley. Obama has had enough of that type of negative / destructive campaigning and will now go directly to the voters and state his platform. That's how it should be this point foward.

Kent from TX   April 24th, 2008 1:00 pm ET

This race really is not that close. When was the last time Clinton won a state by >20%?

But more than that, how many Republicans is Hillary going to align herself with in her desperate attempt to get the White House. There's a reason why Governor Crist (R) in Florida is fighting so hard for the Democratic primary votes to count. It's because the Republicans know Hillary Clinton is MUCH easier for McCain to beat.

People hate Hillary. Rush Limbaugh and Fox News can't wait to make her the foil.

DAN   April 24th, 2008 1:00 pm ET

What a traitor Richardson is, You hear these people say how close these two candidates are on everything so why wouldn't you support your friends who basically helped make who you are. Humans build alliances and friendship all through life which is why loyalty means something. How well would we know Richardson if it wasn't for president Clinton, not much if not at all. Carville was right on the money as Richardsons face was twitching, Carville put him to the test about Obama trying to run from everything, disenfranchise millions of voters by refusing a revote in MI and FL and not debating Hillary in N.C. these are serious matters and if you run from these issues you can't be the president of the most powerful country in the world. Hillary or McCain that's all it comes down to in the end.

@americans   April 24th, 2008 12:59 pm ET

who is not going to be bitter towards the clintons. calling someone a judas is just despicable; who is jesus in this context? Hillary!

americans dont think so!

A Citizen   April 24th, 2008 12:59 pm ET

I watched this program and it is obvious that Richardson is still in "campaign"mode. He repeated the same things he repeated mercilessly during the campaign and debates. He needs some new material. Additionally, I believe he did make false representations regarding his endosement. I have the utmost respect for Carville. I think he can be a character, and he is a bit eccentric, however, I did contact his office directly, at the beginning of this campaign. This primary has been railroaded by the powers that be in the DNC and the media and the Obama campaign. I ttrust Carville's honesty and straight shooting. He tells it like it is, and he has nothing to gain one way or the other. Richardson on the other hand has much to gain….and nothing to lose. I do not believe Hillary is running for President to continue a dynasty…I believe she is running for President because she loves our country, is ambitious, and would like to make a real difference. Additionally, I do not believe she has been unduly negative in this campaign. She has drawn comparisons and contrasts, and speaks up for herslf. Nothing wrong with that. We are electing the next President of the United States for goodness sake….a little bcakbone is needed for the job!

Jesse   April 24th, 2008 12:58 pm ET

The only reason why this campaign isn't going negative is because Obama's trying to run a positive campaign. Hillary's been the one going negative and on the attack. if Obama did stooped to her level, the story would be very different and it would be politics as usual.

Anne   April 24th, 2008 12:58 pm ET

I watched the show. An extremely amusing exchange. Carville's right of course – Let the people vote!

John J   April 24th, 2008 12:57 pm ET

I think Carville makes sense. Why they did not count the voters of Florida and Michigan? Regardless of the bureaucratic rule by DNC boss, votes casted by the voters onstitute support of voters. Clinton may not have the delegation counts per the Big party rule, but she certainly has the support of larger population of voters. How would you think that you can win without Florida and Michigan? What Obama is afraid of for the re-vote? He knew he was going to lose those states.

Kevin   April 24th, 2008 12:57 pm ET

I also watched this show and noted some other key things:

– As a Clinton supporter, Carville was obviously trying to find ways to bait Obama into a debate. However post ABC, Obama will be much more aware of the efforts to tarnish his campaign.
- Carville "quoted" Obama repeatedly changing subtly each time to finally conclude that Obama had stated Indiana will be the tie-breaker and whoever wins the state should get the nomination. lol, Unbelievable spin!
- Richardson stated clearly that Obama is thus far favored and sooner rather than later the party should rally behind a candidate rather than utilize negative attacks. He did not state Hilary should concede or that the remaining states should not count.

I'm sorry but Richardon did well to temper his comments despite the snipings and mis-statements of Carville. It was evident that the debate was merely a forum to provoke Richardson and an effort to get Obama to answer the calls to debate.

Helen   April 24th, 2008 12:57 pm ET

As a person who likes Governor Richardson, I was surprised that he supported Obama over Clinton. My perception of Obama is that he should have waited until he had more experience to run for President. Had he done this, we would not be in the pickle we are in right now and Clinton would already have been nominated. I personally don't think he can win in November.

Obama 08   April 24th, 2008 12:56 pm ET

Richardson is right and all he was saying was that the negative campaign needs to stop.

carol   April 24th, 2008 12:56 pm ET

These comments are a JOKE!

Paid Clinton bloggers, must be…

Supers should have loyalty to their COUNTRY not the Clintons!

What is best for the COUNTRY?

And it ain't slick Willie!

lym   April 24th, 2008 12:55 pm ET

I watched the show as well, and though Richardson made very good points. Obama has tried to stay positive…it is Hillary who is very negative time after time. I dont think Richardson is bitter at all. He knows how the Clintons operate, and apparently have brain washed both Roger & Toronto Girl.

Darryl   April 24th, 2008 12:54 pm ET

i saw this show and Richardson is very bitter toward the Clintons who help him .
———————————————————————————————

You mean USED him.

Obama 08

Current Democratic Delegate- & ex-Obama supporter   April 24th, 2008 12:54 pm ET

Just like Richardson (who I used to respect) is Just another pathetic "BANDWAGON" politician. They swing with the wind and are betting on the "hope" of an Obama win and then a little "payback" to help them get re-elected. Richardson's endorsement speech was a pathetic display of reading something that was obviously written, or heavily re-written, by Obama. It was sickening to see him spend the first 2-3 minutes talking about how Obama's most recent "SPEECH" was what turned him. Gee, I guess I would expect someone to endorse based on "ISSUES" rather than "SPEECHES"… Apparently he's no more immune to the pied piper than many other Americans. It's really sad to see…

–> As a former Obama supporter (and current Democratic Delegate) I'm amazed that so many people are blind to one of the worst dbl standards that has gone on this yr. I guarantee that if Hillary had been going to a church for the past 2yrs that had been "preaching" divisiveness and hateful (anti-Black) concepts she would be "OUT" of this race and most likely "OUT" of politics. You would have seen people like Al Sharpton leading the charge to remove her from office… Obama has over "20 YEARS" with Wright being his "spiritual advisor". He was married and had his children baptized by him. So where's the outcry to remove Obama from politics???… Where’s Al Sharpton???

I couldn't care less about a persons particular church beliefs (catholic, Mormon, atheist, etc.. ) but the hateful and divisive beliefs/comments that Obama chose to remain around speaks volumes about his “judgement”, “character”, and true beliefs in regard to “unity”…

Again, what would have happened if the situation had been reversed and it was a white "preacher" spitting out black hatred… Answer: Hillary would be history. The same should apply to Obama.

–>I prefer someone who "embellishes" something (sniper fire) to someone who "lies" about being around hateful/divisive preaching for 20yrs until called out on it and then "admits" that "yes" he did see it and he "CHOSE" to continue showing his support to such thoughts by remaining their and having that person (Wright) marry him and baptize his kids. You can't talk about "Judgement and Character" without giving that a lot of weight… A lot of weight…

Clinton or McCain in 08.

Kim, Kansas City   April 24th, 2008 12:53 pm ET

I watched this last night and came to the conclusion that Bill Richardson may love his country more than his loyalty to the Clintons but I also think He loves himself more than his country. I think the only reason he endorsed Obama was for his own Political gain. He saw the momentum leaning toward Obama and figured he could further his political career by siding with who he thought would be the nominee.I hope his true colors show and that Obama should watch who he surrounds himself with if he is the nominee, they just might turn on him also.

roslyn   April 24th, 2008 12:53 pm ET

I think richardson is very bitter towards hillary, and sometimes i wonder why, obama run negative ads towards hillary, as soon as she strikes back, it is too negative or is racial, i am getting sick of this, i am a black woman, and it got to the point now, if obama wins, i'm not even bothering to vote…

Fred up north   April 24th, 2008 12:53 pm ET

Carville , repeat theese words : President Obama! President Obama! President Obama! President Obama! President Obama!!!!!!!

Drew   April 24th, 2008 12:53 pm ET

Well her tiara is about to topple.

Ron, Las Vegas   April 24th, 2008 12:53 pm ET

Just goes to show you that the Clinton's and some of their supporters are no better than Bush. I applaud Richardson for not being another Brownie or Myers. You do what is good for the country and not what is good for an individual. I would say that Carville's blind support of the Clinton;s is an act of treason and he is the Benedict Arnold. You can not commit treason against a person, only against a nation.

Manuel TX   April 24th, 2008 12:52 pm ET

Richardson is a joke.

As a Hispanic, I'm saddened that this guy is so visible.

Go back to New Mexico and prepare to lose your governorship.

:)

mary   April 24th, 2008 12:52 pm ET

If I lived in New Mexico I would never vote for Richardson. With friends like him, you don't need enemies. That guy would not be anything if it wasn't for the Clintons.

Nanc, MN   April 24th, 2008 12:52 pm ET

Poor Bill did have that same dazed and confused look that Obama had at the last debate after James got done slapping him around. Call Carville anything you like, at least he doesn't get cute and try to restate what he said or meant, like others that shall remain nameless.

Phillip-Little Rock   April 24th, 2008 12:52 pm ET

I saw the show too, Toronto Girl, and it sounded to me like, just because Clinton helped him long ago, now he's supposed to be in lockstep with their style of politics. Carville is hammering about another debate, first of all, anyone who still needs to hear the issues after 20 debates is just someone that will never make up their minds and both campaigns are better off without them.

One thing you're all forgetting is, after this election, no matter who wins, we all lose. Then, people will have to go about repairing the relationships that were fractured because of the deep divisions that it caused.

Let's begin the process of unifying ourselves as a community and as a party.

Lyn   April 24th, 2008 12:52 pm ET

As usual, the high road versus the back road. Enough of this nonsense! Our young adults are learning from this process. Have we all forgotten that?

Obama Supporter in Indiana

Louis   April 24th, 2008 12:52 pm ET

Last time I checked, nothing in our Constitution or Bill of Rights requires any citizen to support a specific candidate for office regardless of their personal history with that candidate. Carville supports Clinton. Richardson supports Obama. This is democracy at work. Any objections?

Kel from Auburn, AL   April 24th, 2008 12:52 pm ET

Toronto Girl, I can't blame Richardson for being bitter against the Clintons. He supported the candidate he thought would be best and they called him Judas. Judas! That guy is the most historically significant traitor of all time, and they called him Judas. What a campaign of nasty people.

Dwayne in San Diego   April 24th, 2008 12:52 pm ET

All Hail to the Queen! Alas, the Emperess has no clothes! All of this is smoke and mirrors and when all the votes (legitimate) are counted and the delegates and the states won are counted, Obama will win the nomination and the Presidency and restore the democracy to its rightful place. Case Closed!

GO Obama! (a.k.a. Maximus Decimus Meridius!)

fr: Canada   April 24th, 2008 12:51 pm ET

You can sure tell James Carville has worked with the Clintons ,he is crying and whinning about Michican and Florida every time I see him on T.V. If Billary would had won on Feb. 5th we would not be hearing about this.The figured they had it. Bill Richardson was excellent on debating him. Since Hillary can bring up Rezko, and William Ayres. Why has know one brought up the Clintons Civil Fraud Case In Los Angeles.RE PAUL VS. ClINTON? I am amazed at what the Clintons can get away with. How come CNN you have not touched on the subject.????? Do you the media have a protection on Clintons roll in it. Mr Paul has taken a lie dector and has been telling the truth on the monies he loaned her and that she is lyin in saying he did not. We will see if CNN post's this.

OBAMA 08/12

A Grandmother   April 24th, 2008 12:51 pm ET

Carville should have his own show, it would be more informative and
entertaing than anything that is now on TV. Also as fair.

SB   April 24th, 2008 12:51 pm ET

To "roger" and others – It is true that Obama and his campaign have also been negative at times. HOWEVER, this is a case of swordplay versus machine guns and Obama has every right to "scream" about the Clinton campaign's behavior. The Clintons have consistently taken the lead in going negative and have crossed over the line into behavior that is not consistent with being in the same party: 1) Bill implying that while Hillary and McCain are patriotic, Obama is not; 2) Hillary saying outright that she and McCain are ready to lead, but Obama is not up to the task. It is no coincidence that McCain regularly echoes Clinton's attacks without having to launching his own new ideas. If the Clintons wish to get the nomination of the Democratic Party, then they have to play for the team as well as for themselves.

Saqui Huq   April 24th, 2008 12:51 pm ET

James should be ashamed of himself for his comment. I had a great respect for him. I was a Bill supporter then, and with all the negetive scandal I was afraid he might loose! Both James and George did such a fantastic job then. What happened to them now? They tuned 360 degrees in their deminor? I loved Hillary too. The way she stood up with grace during Clinton era. Now I lost all respect for her. She is a disgrace for all women, Lying through her teeth? About everything just to win? She is not going to win the Nomination and will have to live with her lies! She will also not win in the general b/c I know at least 100 people in NY among my friends who will not vote for her, period. B/c the way she carried herself in this campaign. Saqui

Cynthia   April 24th, 2008 12:51 pm ET

Bill Richardson said in the interview that all states should be able to vote period, point blank and simple. The negativity started with the Senator Clinton campaign and Senator Obama had no choice but to fight back. One more important thing that was said was when was in the Presidental race – that all candidates had agreed that Michigan and Florida would not be counted because they did not follow the rules set by the DNC. If everyone is allowed to break the rules in this country – where would we be? The DNC Chairman said they would meet after all the elections have been held and figure out some type of formula to have those delegates seated in a manner that will be fair to both candidates and I think that is the right thing to do.

JENA from Woodbridge   April 24th, 2008 12:50 pm ET

Carville should apoligized to Governor Richardson. The Clintons thinking that they can change the rules. If Hilary is the nomanee, I will not vote at all.

CR   April 24th, 2008 12:50 pm ET

I agree with James Carville regarding his comments about Richardson's endorsement of Obama.

Richardson' s statement “They [the Clintons] feel they’re a dynasty. They’re clinging to the throne” reflects, in my view, very bad on him. First, because the Clinton administration tremendously helped Richardson's political career — and he should be thankful for that. Second, during the Clinton administration we experienced economic prosperity, many social programs were implemented, and we had a relative period of peace. Richardon should praise the achievements of the Clinton years. Finally, there is NOTHING wrong with Hillary's ambition to become the first female president of the United States! The fact Hillary is a Clinton does not signify she belongs to a dynasty. This is a stupid argument! Americans should vote for the best qualified candidate. Period.

Simply put, I would love to experience, once more, the economic and social prosperity of the Clinton years. This is the kind of CHANGE I am voting for!

Hillary 08!

Willam from Texas   April 24th, 2008 12:50 pm ET

Richardson obviously thinks he is going to have some kind of role in the Obama administration, should he become the prez. If he stabbed the Clintons in the back, he would most likely do the same to Obama in the future.

Mike   April 24th, 2008 12:50 pm ET

Richardson is trying to "cling" to a position in the Obama whitehouse.

TheTide   April 24th, 2008 12:50 pm ET

The Clintons go Negtive 100% of the time, and Obama just reacts – the amount of dirt on that empire of theirs is astounding – she is lucky he has not resorted to teh same GOP tactics she has.

The man still has identity, Clinton changes her words and actions based on what part of the country she is in and what her numbers look like.

Debby   April 24th, 2008 12:49 pm ET

I don't get Richardson he tells Clinton he would back her then says the campaigns were getting negative so he backs Obama. Why back anyone if both campaigns were negative. This man needs to go back on his meds.

TAHARI in CT 4 OBAMA   April 24th, 2008 12:49 pm ET

AMEN Richardson! Im so glad you escaped Fantasy Land by the skin of your teeth!

Mary   April 24th, 2008 12:49 pm ET

He (Richardson) knows them better than we do.

Ellen   April 24th, 2008 12:49 pm ET

I concur with you, Roger.

And, why won't Senator Obama agree to debate Senator Clinton in Indiana and North Carolina, as Mr. Carville asked repeatedly during this segment? A debate is the only vehicle in which voters have an opportunity to judge both candidates at the same time. I understand that Senator Obama is unable to perform in such venues, but I can guarentee you that he will have no choice but to debate Senator McCain should he ultimately win the nomination. Shouldn't our president be confident enough to discuss his positions? Why does he continue to hide?

And, yes, Governor Richardson has lost all credibility. Other than discussing dirty politics, which Senator Obama has a major hand in, he is unable to articulate why he ultimately agreed to endorse Senator Obama.

lia,denver   April 24th, 2008 12:49 pm ET

I sent you a comment, it wasn't offensive or anything, but it was not favoring Clinton. You did not publish it, so CNN's bias is very clear.After all, Clinton is advertising on CNN website. … I will try again. I think Bill Richardson is right, Clinton's have an annoying sense of entitlement to presidency. They are turning around people's choice, just to get elected…

souza   April 24th, 2008 12:49 pm ET

If Obama is bitter about Clinton leading in the popular vote maybe he should cling to his religion and guns for support.. Richardson is doing Obama's dirty work.

Paul   April 24th, 2008 12:49 pm ET

Shame on Howard Dean and the media for portraying the primary as too long and divisive. It is you, collectively, who have made this a grueling, nasty battle, not the candidates.

If it would be better to have had just one candidate by now, why allow the votes to be staggered over such a long period of time? Wasn't it just a few short years ago we were "disinfranchised" by winning the popular vote and losing the presidential election?

Isn't allowing every vote to count what makes America great? Back off, talking heads, and let the votes speak for themselves.

Marshall   April 24th, 2008 12:49 pm ET

"Richardson is very bitter toward the Clintons who help him"

Using your logic, you should never go against a former boss, friend or anybody that has giving you any help.

I guess I am missing something.

Kris from AZ   April 24th, 2008 12:48 pm ET

Richardson has a mind of his own and does not have to answer to the so called man(Bill). I think it was a good relationship between the 2 but Richardson does not have to agree on what Bill agrees with or with voting for Hillary. Rishardson is not a trader. He does not have to answer to anybody (like the Clintons) He was a hard worker and did things on his own merits. It has nothing to do with loyalty. I agree with Rishardson over poeple want to cling to a dynasty. Didnt we get that it stinks after the two bushs …I dont get poeple.

The Young & Educated for Obama   April 24th, 2008 12:47 pm ET

Ok Roger and knuckleheads alike:
If I remember correctly Hillary had pictures of Sen. Obama in a turban saying he is Muslim! That didn't work! Now he's playing the race card! That didn't work! Now he is an Elitist! That didn't work!
Hillary got strong arms from throwing that kitchen sink and Sen. Obama have been more than nice to this Republican Hillary!
How dare you even say Obama have been Negative let me tell you he is been a DECENT UPSTANDING MAN!
Thats why I know I could never run for president cuz by now she would be MUD with all the Junk and Baggage she's got in the trunk! I would have hit her Hardddddddd!!!!!!!

Cnn For Me   April 24th, 2008 12:47 pm ET

I have plenty of ex bosses… Get it EX BOSSES. Who gave me a job. I work for a pay… You are not giving me anything. Why are we looking at this man as if Clinton saved him from slavery? he gave him a job… that he did well. Thats it. Let me see you bend over for your boss when his wife needs your support on something that YOU DO NOT SUPPORT… I mean cmon… You own him don't You???

again… God help us all.

Ron   April 24th, 2008 12:46 pm ET

The Clinton years were the best years the country as had in the last two plus decades. the shape the country is in right now the last thing it needs is an idealist like Obama. He knows if he goes into another debate that the precedence as been set for the moderators to ask him to explain his answers which he as not been asked to do before. because he always talks in generalities and not in specifics he shows he as no real idea of how he will attain the wonderful future he talks about when pressed to explain. Richardson sounds like Casey the must read off the same pages when promoting Sen Obama , they are so syrupy you would think they are feeling romantic towards him the country needs somebody to get them out of this mess vote Clinton

Linda   April 24th, 2008 12:46 pm ET

It's true what Gov. Richardson said. The Clintons act as if there supposed to be in the White House. Hillary Clinton is a liar and will tell the American people anything just to get back into the White House. She's been talking about healthcare for 15 years. Why couldn't she get this done? She cant be trusted. Slhe thinks she's going to lie all the way into the White House. Now she's trying to count the delegates from Michigan and Florida. Obama wasn't on the ballot, he didn't even campaign in florida. She's thinks everybody is stupid.

Phil in KC   April 24th, 2008 12:44 pm ET

I missed the beginning of the program. While I normally like James Carville, I thought Richardson came off a lot better in terms of what I did see.
Personally, I like debates. I think they give you insight into the candidate and let you know where they stand. But, after 20 debates, what more is there to learn? Yes, Hillary is a better debater. Big deal. It sounds to me like the Clinton camp is just looking for more opportunities to beat up on Obama.
If they keep bloodying their opponent, it will only help the Republicans. Because it will damage Obama if he is the nominee and it will turn off the voters if she is the nominee.
I, like Carville, have said that I would vote for the eventual nominee, whoever it might be. But Hillary is making that VERY hard. If she becomes the party's nominee, I will not be voting for her as much as I will be voting against McCain.

Helene   April 24th, 2008 12:44 pm ET

Yes, Lady Macbeth she is. Except that we don't have royalty in this country and that after 8 years of Clinton and 8 years of Bush, it is time for a change, a real change. Obama !

Jaime   April 24th, 2008 12:44 pm ET

I wish I'd seen the show. Regardless, Carville & his disdain is about to be out of a job….

woody   April 24th, 2008 12:44 pm ET

if Richardson is Judas, then Bill Clinton is Jonah because he was swallowed by a whale….! LOL!

gini   April 24th, 2008 12:43 pm ET

what is up with Obama and his supporters always trying to clump groups together. the 'typical Clinton supporter!' geez could he be more narrow-minded? Sucks for him, as a Clinton supporter, I actually thought Richardson took the high road by ignoring Carville at first, but now, he seems more like a 'typical' Obama supporter.

YOU NEED TO KNOW   April 24th, 2008 12:43 pm ET

After Gov. Richardson made his decision for the GOOD OF THE COUNTRY the Clintons treated him like DIRT….I wouldn't blame him one bit if he's bitter towards the Clintons.

Blake   April 24th, 2008 12:42 pm ET

Other way around Toronto Girl. Do you really think with the whinning the Clintons do they are hunky doory with their friend and fellow NFL Super Bowl watcher endorsing the other guy? Who is bitter? Why would Richardson be bitter. He has endorsed the winning and likely nominee. It is the losers who get bitter. I have not seen many former Obama supporters endorse Hilary, but I see them every few days it seems like for Obama.

John, Indianapolis, IN   April 24th, 2008 12:42 pm ET

Gov. Richardson, you are a very honorable person! The Clintons have a group of idiots like Jame Carville, who they never give a straight answer/talk. You corner and bet him well!

dems unite   April 24th, 2008 12:42 pm ET

DEMS UNITE, CLINTON AND OBAMA POLICIES ARE THE SAME, DON'T VOTE FOR MCCAIN JUST BECAUSE YOUR CANDIDATE DIDN'T GET THE NOMINATION … WE DON'T NEED A BUSH 3RD TERM, LOOK AT GAS PRICES, THE WAR IN IRAQ, THE ECONOMY!

cnn please post my comments instead of posting comments that only lead to further divisiveness among democrat!

RT   April 24th, 2008 12:41 pm ET

Hey Folks, don't forget that it was Carville who attacked Richardson.

Grif   April 24th, 2008 12:41 pm ET

If you don't shout LOud enough, they're not going to Listen…
The Black Vote, want's to steal all Base's…..

Angus McDugan   April 24th, 2008 12:41 pm ET

Toronto Girl – Makes you wonder what he knows about the Clintons doesn't it?

Marc in DeKalb, IL   April 24th, 2008 12:40 pm ET

Merit, not entitlement, in 2008.

April in Texas   April 24th, 2008 12:40 pm ET

Good grief.. I am getting the impression the Richardson Endorsement is much bigger than I thought.. The Clintons and their supporter(s) mainly Carville still seem so upset. Well WTG Richardson for choosing the best canidate instead of those who feel they are owed something.. Talk about an elite atitude the Clintons have that hands down..

Respect is earned not bought….

Obama 08

Jay   April 24th, 2008 12:40 pm ET

Richardson is coming off as a punk. He needs to shut up.

If Hillary is winning still, there is no reason to drop out. Richardson should worry about New Mexico, you know the State that voted for Hillary!

Scott ATL   April 24th, 2008 12:40 pm ET

I used to like Carville. Now he just seems like an instigating bully. The kid in the school yard that kept the fight going…lol I can see now that Clinton surrogates will not get their "payback" from the Clintons if they can't get them to the White-house. If Obama won in MI or FL, Carville would have a crochet baby with knitted eyeballs trying to keep them from being counted. (Well, I guess when you can't when fair and square, you'll try anything…) Hillary called FOX News fair and balanced for cry'n out loud…lol You know they'll do anything to win now… I hope FOX starts to use that "sound-bite" in an advertisement…

The desparation is paletable…

Carville, you said that if Obama wins, you have a check made out for the maximum contribution ready and waiting with his name on it… Guess what… You can keep it. We got him already…

I know you like to think you're still relevant and necessary, but when the politics change in Washington, so will the need for folks like you and Rove…. (Never thought I'd mention your two names in the same sentence, but that's who you're starting to remind me of…) What makes you any different.

Bill, stick to your guns… I would go to the mattresses for you and so would alot of others who can see with a logical eye, what's going on…

Jeff - Dallas   April 24th, 2008 12:40 pm ET

Can we remember why Hillary is a Senator in New York to begin with? She is a carpetbagger! Prior to making the decision to run for the Senate, she had never had a residence in the State of New York! She chose not to run for the Senate in Illinois or in Arkansas, even though she had lived in both states.
Instead, she was handpicked by her predecessor, Patrick Moynihan in New York, knowing that being a NY Senatorial position offered the best stepping stone to an eventual run for the White House. Why did she abandon Arkansas, her adult home state? Because she will stop at no manipulation, mis-representation, political posturing and down right dirty tricks, to extend the Clinton dynasty.
How can anyone believe anything she says or does, without thinking about her past?

Tubby The Tuba from Texas   April 24th, 2008 12:39 pm ET

Go Bill Richardson. I love your state. You would make an awesome Vice-President (in training for President).

Susan MO   April 24th, 2008 12:38 pm ET

Carville, give it a rest you lose

Its got to be Hillary!!!!!!!!   April 24th, 2008 12:38 pm ET

Sounds like obama supporters think that people that are not of their statuer CLING to everything to be on their high and mighty Holier than thou level, What an Elitis pompus Jerk, Or better yet JUDAS! richardson has lost my respect.

Hispanics for Hillary Clinton NoW and FOREVER!!!

cecil   April 24th, 2008 12:38 pm ET

Sen. Clinton didn't get her double digit win, a win is 50% plus 1 correct.
9.2% isn't 10.
A win is a win.
A lose is a lose. and 9.2 is 9.2 period.

Sen. Clinton faces uphill battle in North Carolina, well welcome to Sen. Obama world this round.

Mixen   April 24th, 2008 12:38 pm ET

I really like Bill Richardson. His support of Obama has had a big influence on me.

Christian, Tampa FL   April 24th, 2008 12:38 pm ET

Bill Richardson is so much cooler than James Carville, and he's absolutely right. Hillary feels entitled to the Presidency and she'll do anything to get it even if she has to destroy the party. Personally, I want to see the Clinton dynasty ended and I hope Barack Obama can achieve that. The Clintonian saga has lasted too long.

A&A   April 24th, 2008 12:37 pm ET

i saw this on CNN and was deeply disturbed by the comment of Bill Richardson…as he was trying to spin every question in Obama's favor he looked desperate and miserable…poor man, poor poor man..

erick macc   April 24th, 2008 12:37 pm ET

To say we will atact a conuntry when you are not presadent is very negative before she even is a presadent it scares the hec out of alot of people she does not no what she is getting into like they say never let a women do a mans job god made us men we are the leading roles on earth. except it don,t push buttons even when you are trying to gain the worlds trust.

proud army and navy mom   April 24th, 2008 12:36 pm ET

i like richardson, he tells it like it is

Vince - Phoenix   April 24th, 2008 12:35 pm ET

Whaaa…. whaaa….

we need 100 more debates!!!! whaaaaa……. everybody against hillary is stupid……. whaaaaaaa! Barack is running…… Whaaaaaa

This dude's act is SO tired……

but hillary-ites eat up!

Judas Richardson   April 24th, 2008 12:34 pm ET

Bill Richardson is effectively irrelevant. Once his term as governor ends he will fade into obscurity.

Chris   April 24th, 2008 12:33 pm ET

I think Bill Richardson looked like rather silly last night. He is a traitor and has no loyalty at all. He owes the Clinton's out of loyalty. But Bill is thinking that endorsing Obama, he might get the VP ride. I THINK NOT!

Tamika   April 24th, 2008 12:33 pm ET

Why isnt CNN(the most watched news channel in my opinon)covering where Mr. and Mrs. Clinton are going to be tomarrow and why? Are you afraid of them like everyone else is..why isnt anyone covering "The Hillary Movie".. if this were Obama.. it would be OVER!!!!! you all should be ashamed of yourself as journalists…I am sure you wont be posting this!..people go to you tube and see the movie(full)for yourselves and wake up!!!!.. google Clinton V Paul (California April 25th 2008)…

If i get this posted it would be a miracle…and then you'd remain my MOST watched news channel(maybe)

KBest   April 24th, 2008 12:33 pm ET

James Carville used to have my respect as a very articulate CNN Analyst, until recently. His unapologetic attack and name calling on Bill Richardson is uncalled for. That is not the direction America should be headed.

Ascension to the America Presidency is not supposed to be a do-or-die affair for the Clintons and their surrogates. It is only in a Monarchy and other Theocracies that you cannot vote your conscience. Democracy is open-mindedness, James, and if Obama's message can win Bill Richardson to his side, what then is his sin in endorcing Obama? James, respect yourself, because some of us respect you a lot. Your blind loyalty to the Clintons does not give you the arrogant right to castigate others who have not tagged along.

Bill, your comporture is commendable and exemplary. You have behaved in a manner conformable to what is right, proper and expected. Your choice of word is not 'Judascious' and 'Idiotic'. You have my respect for following your conscience and watching your mouth.

mitch from ark.   April 24th, 2008 12:32 pm ET

bill richardson is an honorable man,who is being chastised,for making a choice,he has every right to make.james carville's demeanor seems to be lightening up a bit,now that hillary's basically out of the race.he said hillary needed tx ,oh. and pa.,to stand any chance ,in the delegate race,and she lost texas,even though they claim it as a win.

Michigan Voter   April 24th, 2008 12:31 pm ET

Richardson is a STUD!

Gerald F.   April 24th, 2008 12:31 pm ET

Maybe Senators' Clinton and Obama could both take some much needed rest and let these two boys (Carville & Richardson) just duke it out with cream pies for a while instead of just name calling? ( Easier on the hearing than shouting constant "Nah-Nahs" at one another on national tv.)

lip   April 24th, 2008 12:31 pm ET

Carville and Hillary are Dinosaurs from the long extinct Clinton period of prehistory.
Listen to Hillary explain her logic on her lead over Obama. Hillary is delusional. This is quite similar to her delusional recounting of the hail of gun fire as she and Chelsea ran from the back of the plane to the waiting crowd of "children" who greeted her with flowers (in the hail of gunfire). A psychiatrist would probably explain this condition as shellshock after living with Slick Willy for all those years of relationships with other women. Do we really want this character and her entourage (to include this wacko James Carville) messing with our White House again?
Think it over folks…there is very little time left.

Sharilyn Fletcher   April 24th, 2008 12:31 pm ET

Hillary's Camp will stop at nothing to get her the nomination. Bill and Hillary used the Black community to push their political agenda. Now, it is very clear what they really thought of Blacks. Also, the big guys are setting up themselves to steal the nomination from Obama. They will regret it. Black folks are not just going to sit and let this happen.

Sharilyn

Fishers, Indiana   April 24th, 2008 12:31 pm ET

Barack Hussein Obama will never be elected President of the USA.

Enough said.

To describe it as a monarch was a poor choice of words and very disturbing to hear from Richardson, but consider the source.

Hillary Clinton '08 & '12

Bob, Lyons Oregon,   April 24th, 2008 12:30 pm ET

I agree with Bill Richardson. James Carville is just as nasty as Clinton, you can see it in his face, just like you can see it in her face. She feels its owed to her. When she was ahead, she agreed that MI and Fl didn't count, because they didn't follow the rules of the party, but now that she is behind, she wants to count them, when its totally and utterly ridiculous. Especially now that she has tried to make it look as if its obama's fault these 2 states don't count. He followed the rules. I just find it interesting, they the clinton's and some of their supporters are so unscrupulous that they can even consider these 2 states. She will do anything to win. I want an honest president working for us. They can call her a fighter, but it's not fighting that she is doing, it's deviding the party with her negatives, and this democrat is leaning more and more to McCain, if Clinton becomes the nominee because of her tactics. I think Obama is the best candidate to work for the american people. Honesty is the best policy, and I do not see this woman as honest, nor her husband anymore. I still do not see what experience she has over obama, other then being the president's wife. I have not seen it. Id love to see a woman as president, but one with scrupels not her, she would have alot of convincing to do, to get my vote, as I am sure alot of others feel the same way. Several months ago, I might have considered going over to her, but with all her negatives, and win at all cost's shows me she is a very selfish person, and only cares about herself, not the american people. She says words count, and her words have resinated with me, and the only way I would vote for her, is the same way alot of McCain voters (as his mother put it) hold my nose to vote for her.

Obama 08, 12

Toronto Girl   April 24th, 2008 12:30 pm ET

i saw this show and Richardson is very bitter toward the Clintons who help him .

roger   April 24th, 2008 12:30 pm ET

I think Carville makes some good points, I watched the entire show 1) why should the states that have not held theri primaries have a choice 2) the Obama campaign make negative remarks about Hillary but scream when she makes one about him. If Richardson or anyone else thinks this campaign has been negative or it is going to hurt the democrats in the general they are just blowing smoke…..

tessa   April 24th, 2008 12:29 pm ET

Richardson said it perfectly… that they are clinging to a throne. I feel that Hillary Clinton does not care what she does to the Democratic party, she wants to go down in history as being the first woman president. She's the elitist and is so extremely arrogant. I really had so much respect for her and in the beginning was on her side but I have truly lost all respect for her. I simply could never vote for her because of this.

A. Harrison   April 24th, 2008 12:29 pm ET

After listening to Gov Richardson idiotic argument It's my opinion that we are in a Twilight Zone now.

Point blank, Obama and his surrogates don't want the Democratic race to continue, they want to cut to the chase, disenfranchise Florida and Michigan, and claim some sort of "legal" but truly invalid victory (remember 2000).

How is Senator Clinton claiming the throne when she gets out there and works hard for her votes, half the things Barack says came out of her mouth first. This race is totally about likeability, cause I don't see anyone left out there running for President that is a true change from Bush and qualified at that.

NJ in FL   April 24th, 2008 12:29 pm ET

Whenever Barack speaks about the issue of Florida and Michigan, he never fails to mention that his name was not on the Michigan ballot, but he also avoids to say that his name was on the Florida ballot and that people did vote for both Clinton and Obama.
I for one would like to know why he left his name on the Florida ballot and decided to remove his name off the Michigan ballot.
What's wrong with the remainder of the states having their say before any super delegates state who they will back. Since they were to be the tie breaker, it seems that they should have kept their mouths shut until all states had their primaries.
Something doesn't feel right, when Guam and Puerto Rico will have their say, but not Florida and Michigan.
In the end all democrats will come together and vote in the general election, lets hope that the votes are for what is right for our country and not on the race thing.

Jay Shah   April 24th, 2008 12:28 pm ET

James Carville is the Clinton's lap dog. He is a political figure with no office. So therefore he can say or do whatever his Masters i.e the Clintons tell him to and he has no public backlash to fear.

Please Indianians and North Carolinians…help end this drama and vote against Billary.

Timothy   April 24th, 2008 12:28 pm ET

Gov. Richardson is absolutely right the Clinton's think they are apparent heirs to the throne. After Sen. Clinton whose next their daughter.

Bayou Joe   April 24th, 2008 12:27 pm ET

How petty and childish. The world is watching our grown ups insult each other. No wonder the young have no respect for tradition and
their elders. Shame on you two. I guess they reflect the values of their candidates.

God help us all.

Texas Vet   April 24th, 2008 12:27 pm ET

I hope James Carville continues to get interviewed. He is a little bit like a Doberman on speed. He represents the way the Clintons feel about anyone that doesn’t support them. It is interesting that a lot of people who “worked” for the Clintons are supporting Obama. I salute their bravery, if Hillary gets elected payback will be hell.

Maybe Hillary will have James attack John Edwards. No, John Edwards has not yet endorsed a candidate.

But nearly 50 of his most prominent backers lined up behind Senator Barack Obama yesterday, in a gesture designed to give Mr. Obama a heavy boost of support less than two weeks before the North Carolina primary on May 6.

The group includes Ed Turlington, Mr. Edwards’s former national general campaign chairman; three North Carolina members of Congress; and 46 local activists, philanthropists and business leaders, among others. (Not surprisingly, given Mr. Edwards’s background, the list holds the names of 20 lawyers.)

Things just got tougher for the Clintons in North Carolina.

Sandi Giles-Ashton   April 24th, 2008 12:27 pm ET

What is wrong with Richardson? Why did he turn on Hillary? He seems very angry (so what if Carvell made some comments). We are not hanging onto the throne. Is he trying to get the VP with Obama? Well, I sure won't vote for Obama if Richardson is on the ticket.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Jamaal Kansas   April 24th, 2008 12:27 pm ET

Why should he Debate all Hillary want to do is Debate him so she can attack him directly Barack will get no more votes from antoher Debate because they have already had about 21 debates

CHICANO ART, ARIZONA   April 24th, 2008 12:27 pm ET

I was proud of Gov. Richardson when he ran for President and quit before the contest hit his state and mine in Arizona where he might have done better than in NH. He quit. He dissappointed me because he gave up so easily. That is why I like Hillary Clinton. She is a fighter and I need someone that is going to fight for me, like universal healthcare.

Just one more thing… Richardson was not projecting the positive image Obama's camp wants to portray because the more they are percieved to be politicians the more their augument of being above politics that much more ridiculous.

Kay-Arizona   April 24th, 2008 12:26 pm ET

Why shouldn't the Florida and Michigan democrats who bothered to vote be factored in for the popular vote? The DNC, in all their flawed logic, said they would not seat the delegates that resulted from these primaries, but that does not mean they don't exist. The voters were still there.

Over two million democrats bothered to come to the polls and cast their ballots, and Richardson wants to forget they exist because they didn't vote the way he wanted them to.

With that kind of logic they might decide to forget the democratic party exists in November.

Speaking of destroying the Democratic Party for the advantage of one candidate !!

Luke in Dallas   April 24th, 2008 12:26 pm ET

Mind you Sen. Richardson, she has 15,095,663 voters on her side.

“Typical of the reaction of Clinton supporters” is serious personal attack to all the people who voted for Hillary!!

Michael   April 24th, 2008 12:26 pm ET

Why to the Dems always blow it? I told everyone I know early in the primaries, they should have picked Edwards, a white Southern male with strong labor ties. The "Reagan Democrats" will never vote for a black, or for Hillary. Now we have all this stupid bickering and the unimaginable prospect of a McCain presidency!

Jordan   April 24th, 2008 12:25 pm ET

Richardson is right again… Nice Bill!

ss   April 24th, 2008 12:24 pm ET

Carville is the man. The metaphor that Carville used on Easter time is the best I’ve seen. Richardson has no loyalty. You will see – if Obama continues to not perform Richardson will get out of his boat in a hurry.

B.NYC   April 24th, 2008 12:24 pm ET

Dear Gov. Richardson,

News Flash… Half (if not a bit more) of the Democratic party support Senator Clinton. If you have not checked lately, Senator Obama has lost ALL of the big states dispite spending four times the money the Clinton camp. invested…

Dynasty? Thats a good one sir… Seems you would not have a job if it were not for President Clinton (because you are kind of a joke).

You are not going to change the minds of Clinton supporters, we know who the strong person in this race is… You can beat her down but she has never quit and never made lame excuses…

Sorry man, your guy is only supported by 1/4 of the country… Get a grip.

B.

DZ in Austin   April 24th, 2008 12:24 pm ET

Jumping on the back of a band wagon doesn't mean you know how to play an instrument. I'm guessing the ride on the Clinton band wagon got a little rough, so Richardson jumped off looking for a smoother ride. Too bad he left his dignity on the road between them. While I understand he never promised to endorse Hillary, I am convinced he did promise not to endorse anyone and he broke that promise. Judas is as Judas does.

Jim   April 24th, 2008 12:24 pm ET

GO Richardson!! Put them in their place dude!

DD, New York   April 24th, 2008 12:24 pm ET

Bill Richardson, if Obama wins the nomination, you will quickly find out he cannot win out against McCain! You will realize you have made a terrible mistake in supporting Obama. And if, by some chance, Obama wins the nomination and goes on to the presidency, you will quickly learn how inexperienced, inept and wrong for this highest job in the land! I do believe Carville went soft on you, to boot!

Alex H   April 24th, 2008 12:24 pm ET

I love how Carville said everyone should stop whining… and then started whining!

Deo   April 24th, 2008 12:23 pm ET

Richardson knows the Clintons better than most of us. Indeed, I always wonder why the Clintons do not want to concede, and seem to be ready to play any kind of foul to win. I hoped they would show their maturity, like John Eduards, or other candidates who have dropped out of the race. It's obvious, Clinton can't overtake Obama. Why does she want to force the Superdelagates to go against the will of the voters? Why doesn't she show love to the Democratic Party that she and her husband have been serving for so long and drop out for the good of the Party and all Democrats?

Wish this race is over soon and look forward to having a Democrat in the White House come November.

ashish   April 24th, 2008 12:23 pm ET

too much acrimony, we're all on the same team

Gail   April 24th, 2008 12:23 pm ET

This is so true. No they are on the debate mantra. Obama had agree to debate in NC on April 19 and Clinton Agreed to the 27….therefore there was not agreement. The candidate which is behind, always wants more debates, and that is Clinton.

Stop the madness

elli   April 24th, 2008 12:23 pm ET

I do not wish to undermine the prior accomplishments of the Clintons. However, I would like to see a change from the Busch-Clinton-Bush tradition, i.e. Obama or even McCain as a president.
BTW:Politico recently reported that Clinton is prob. not going to get that double-digit win in Pennsylvania after all.
With 99.5% of precincts reporting, she's at a 9.2% lead; and the votes left to be counted seem to be in Philadelphia….

cecil   April 24th, 2008 12:23 pm ET

She started with a lead of almost 20 points. But her final margin was 9.2% period. CNN, CBS, NBC, ABC Just state the facts please, you have them!

This was no blowout.

All those White Americans really help her in Penn.
.
All those African Americans really help Sen. Obama in Penn..

Clinton faces uphill battle in North Carolina, welcome to Obamas world.

9.2% in Sen Hillary play ground not bad . Lets see how she does in NC.

Obama Supporters Lets continue to give of our time and money.

Sen. Obama 08

ShannonL   April 24th, 2008 12:22 pm ET

Richardson is a traitor…plain and simple. Not only did he turn his back on the people that made his career happen, he also turned his back on NM voters when he endorsed Obama, even though Clinton won his state….and this is after promising his state that he would endorse the winner.

So not only has he lied to the Clintons. He also lied to his entire state and broke a promise he made ot them.

With friends like Richardson, who needs enemies?

Angry Democrat   April 24th, 2008 12:22 pm ET

I have absolutely had it. I can't believe how much Clinton repeatedly changes the rules of the game as she goes. I come from a very split political family and I have always argued on behalf of democatic candidates and causes but I have lost ALL trust in Clinton. If Barack Obama does not win the nomination, I will vote for McCain. It makes me ill to even say that, but I could not live with myself putting Hillary Clinton in the White House after her horrific and careless campaign. She does not care about how badly her and her husband damage our party in their selfish push to get back into the White House. I have lost respect for both of them. If Obama does not come out of this with his well-deserved nomination the democratic party will lose all of it's excitment and young life that has been drawn to it, more specifically drawn to Barack Obama. I have confidence that the superdelegates can see through the Clinton Spin.

sandie   April 24th, 2008 12:21 pm ET

Why hasn't any one mentioned that the fact that Hillary want to count FL. and MI now that she needs the votes and delegate.Is this not more proof that she is not a truthful person. She signed off on the rules now she's trying to go back on her word!! Think people this is not a person that means what she say, she'll say or do any thing to win.

Jen - Left Coaster   April 24th, 2008 12:21 pm ET

I agree with Carville. Instead of the candidates' supporters debating, let the candidates debate. I know they have had myriad debates, but let's hear the issues. What was omitted in this article is that Carville and others recommended a revote, therefore, both candidates having a fair opportunity. I am not sure what is wrong with that. It is fair for both candidates. I am offended by Richardson's comment that Clinton supporters are clinging to the throne. I vote on the issues, not on a throne. Period.

The Young & Educated for Obama   April 24th, 2008 12:20 pm ET

I AGREE! The Clintons believe they are 'ENTITLED' to the presidency and that is NOT HOW THIS WORKS!
ITS the PEOPLE who elects its president! If you LIE and DECEIVE the people you are NOT FIT to be President!
After May 6th this flip flop of a race will be put to rest because the Smart ones heard enough LIES from Hillary!

Obama 08/12

Tony Z- MD   April 24th, 2008 12:20 pm ET

HRC supporters listen to Richardson and other former Bill Clinton cabinenet members. The DNC and America need new life. Clinton lost Gore the White House.

White Middle-Aged Female in PA for Obama   April 24th, 2008 12:20 pm ET

That says it all.

Obama '08 and '12

Mike from Westchester   April 24th, 2008 12:20 pm ET

Go Richardson! You got to love this guy. He took on a charter member of the Clinton liars' club last night.

The biggest joke line from Carville was that Indiana should be the "tiebreaker". LOL. What tie? Consider the porportional rules, Obama is killing her.

138 up, including superdelegates. With NC and OR going big for Obama, he will be 150 up come June 3. There will probably be less than 250 superdelegates to go at that point, so HRC will have to get over 80% of the remainder when Obama is the clear pledged delegate winner at about +175. Not happening unless the Clintons do something really underhanded, which, of course, would kill her chances in November.

Sorry, but Hillary will never be President. Just the way it is. We all need to rally behind our candidate, Barack Obama.

vic nashville,Tn   April 24th, 2008 12:20 pm ET

Best show in 2008 . We have to crate new award for Larry . The award should be the best in the whole planet . I love you Larry
James Carville did a good job, we have to count FL and MI or redo and need more debates. The show made Hillary supporters more strong because we have valid reason to support her
Hillary 08

Belle   April 24th, 2008 12:20 pm ET

YET ANOTHER OBAMA CAMPAIGN LIE!!!!!!!

CNN WHY DO YOU CALL CLINTON DIVISIVE? LOOK AT WHAT OBAMA'S CAMPAIGN DOES?????

Do you REALLY think us voters are so stupid we don't recognize this?

What about Carville calling Richardson to task on the revote in FL and MI and the OFFER from the Clinton campaign to fund it??? What about the argument between the two that Richarson finally had to agree with Carville.

Why don't you try some fair reporting?

fred   April 24th, 2008 12:19 pm ET

Boy I am sure glad I found out how stupid Richardson is!!!!

lk   April 24th, 2008 12:19 pm ET

wow…..we really are about to lose this election….

Jay, Georgia   April 24th, 2008 12:19 pm ET

JUDA!

Hillary-ious   April 24th, 2008 12:19 pm ET

There should be absolutely no question that the votes in Florida and Michigan should NOT count and here's why:

Everyone knew going into those primaries that the results were not going to count for anything. It was very common knowledge. The media was calling it a "beauty contest" at the time for that reason. As a result, many people who might have otherwise voted in those states may not have. In other cases, people may have voted in the Republican primary instead, since it at least had some meaning. No matter how hard Hillary and her supporters try, they cannot make those results fair in the slightest, so they should not count, period. Of course, there is also the tiny issue that Obama's name WASN'T EVEN ON THE BALLOT in Michigan…

And there's one more hitch to Clinton's plan to try to argue that the popular vote has more meaning than delegates-

Many of the caucus states do not even record the popular vote totals. These are states that DID play by the rules, and held their caucuses by the book, and only delegate totals were recorded not popular votes. Hillary is conveniently leaving these states out of her calculations, along with ALL other caucus states. Keep in mind that this is coming from the candidate who wants "every vote to count", and "every voice to be heard"…

Just another example of how she is willing to twist anything to her advantage. SHOW SOME CREDABILITY AND SENSE OF FAIRNESS HILLARY!! Your lame arguments are transparent to most voters.

Thomas in Florida   April 24th, 2008 12:18 pm ET

Way to go Richardson…perfect analogy.

How dare WE the PEOPLE get in the way of the Clintonian Dynasty.

Sharon   April 24th, 2008 12:18 pm ET

Love how Richardson is bashing the ONLY SUCCESSFUL DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENCY WE'VE HAD IN DECADES!!!
Richardson did such a bad job last night on Larry King…..he sounded defensive and just kept coming back to "it's gotten so negative" UGH….does everyone who backs BO have to WHINE so much?????? He couldn't hand the race either and dropped out….

Richardson was a traitor, James Carville did not have a bad reation to any other BO backer….Richardson OBVIOUSLY did something bad behind the scenes that James is refraining from letting the media know….

Ricarson is now on a campaign of his own trying to save his skin….

African for Hillary   April 24th, 2008 12:18 pm ET

James Carville is honest , smart and straight talker , i watch CNN becuase of him .

Dave   April 24th, 2008 12:18 pm ET

Who is this Bill Richardson?? Why does he feel he is relevant?? He is nobody and his opinions are worth foxtrot alpha.

Brett   April 24th, 2008 12:17 pm ET

The most divisive comments I have ever heard, Governor Richardson. Talk about biting the hand that fed you for 8 years. Now you're not only going to insult Mrs. Clinton and her husband, but also their SUPPORTERS? An abhorrence on politics. Dispicable. I'm glad you supported Obama!

Andrea L   April 24th, 2008 12:17 pm ET

That it's Governor, call your fellow democratics name…. maybe you don't need our vote to win…… If you are VP I will defintely vote for MCain

Stacy Clarks, TX   April 24th, 2008 12:17 pm ET

peace to the world and the democratic party!!

OBAMA 08!!

DEMOCRATS 08!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Jane, NC   April 24th, 2008 12:17 pm ET

The Clinton campaign has not said anything at all about other endorsements except to express gratitude for those they received. Bill Richardson is the only one they've made an issue of, and for good reason. The irony is that his endorsement has, of course, probably made little difference in the Obama campaign. Naturally, Richardson did this in his own self- interests, and now the other irony is that the side he gambled would win just might not.

SueB   April 24th, 2008 12:17 pm ET

Carville's comments are inane. It's like he's putting some sort of voodoo curse on anyone who doesn't tow the Clinton line. It's time for Hillary, Bill, Carville and all their little gang to go home now and let the grown-ups talk.
More politicians should be like Richardson and have the courage and backbone to do the right thing for the country instead of what the Clintons command them to do.

Vince   April 24th, 2008 12:16 pm ET

Very accurate description by Richardson, notice how angry Carville looks.

Windy Vincent   April 24th, 2008 12:16 pm ET

It was Bush the father and then come Clinton the husband,now Bush the son,then it will come Clinton the Wife.Later come Bush the younger brother and again Clinton the daughter and this will continue forever with this two family dinasty WOW,people in USA preach their intelligence and democracy.Hey,this's a demostration of craze as you continue to recycle same family for leaders and why race play a big role in your politic. China,Syria,Iran,Cameroon,DPRK,Iraq etc has won cause we all see your system is full of lies racism.

Sharon   April 24th, 2008 12:16 pm ET

Richardson did such a bad job last night on Larry King…..he sounded defensive and just kept coming back to "it's gotten so negative" UGH….does everyone who backs BO have to WHINE so much?????? He couldn't hand the race either and dropped out….

Richardson was a traitor, James Carville did not have a bad reation to any other BO backer….Richardson OBVIOUSLY did something bad behind the scenes that James is refraining from letting the media know….

Ricarson is now on a campaign of his own trying to save his skin….

Shubert   April 24th, 2008 12:16 pm ET

He said it, which is the truth. It is sad to see that is happening in the U.S. being the promontory of a democratic world.
Even our American politicians are not free – Tell me “What happen to freedom”

Tan in Dallas   April 24th, 2008 12:16 pm ET

"typical of the reaction of Clinton supporters" ???

This comment is even worse than being a judas.

Regina   April 24th, 2008 12:16 pm ET

Dear Governor Richardson,

Thank you for your courage, your honesty and your endorsement for Barack Obama, the true hope of the people.

DWC   April 24th, 2008 12:15 pm ET

Hillary needs to put Michgan and Florida to REST!
There was NO DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY IN THOSE STATES!
There she goes again with mis-truths!
SHE IS NOT AHEAD IN THE POPULAR VOTE!

LET ME SPEAK PLAINLY! HILLARY HAD SEVEN YEARS IN THE US SENATE TO PROVE SHE WAS PRESIDENTIAL MATERIAL AND SHE FAILED!!!
SHE HAS ENDORESED AND SUPPORTED GEORGE W. BUSGH IN ALL HIS BANK RUPT AND DESOLATE POLICIES FOR SEVEN YEARS!

THE HOUSING CRISIS DIN'T HAPPEN YESTERDAY???

PENSYLVANIA AND OTHER STATES DID NOT LOSE JOBS YESTERDAY TO NAFTA!! CAN YOU SAY NAFTA????
THE WAR IN IRAQ DIDN'T START YESTERDAY???
WE STILL HAVEN'T FOUND BIN LARDIN

WHAT HAS HILLARY DONE AND SAID IN THE US SENATE FOR SEVEN YEARS TO PROVE SHE IS AND WILL BE PRESIDENTIAL MATERIAL EXCEPT STROKE RACIAL SUSPECION AND STRIFE AMONG REPUBLICANS????

SURE PEOPLE ARE CLINGING TO THEIR GUNS AND RELIGION, IN DIFFICULT TIMES, WE CLING TO THEM IN GOOD TIMES THESE THINGS ARE THE BACK BONE OF OUR AMERICAN IDENTITY AND PRIDE!

IF SHE SUPPORTS GUN OWNERS RIGHTS, HOW COME AS AN AMERICAN I CAN NOT OWN A GUN IN NYC?????????

FOR THOSE OF YOU MY FELLOW AMERICAN WHO BELIEVE IN FAIRY TAILS AND DISNEY WORLD WHEN WE ARE LOOSING JOBS, LOOSING OUR HOMES OUR IDENTITY OUR STANDING IN THE THE WORLD I SAY LET HILROD LEAD THE WAY THE WAY SHE HAS DONE FOR SEVEN YEARS IN THE SENATE

FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO BELIEVE IN THE YOUND HUNK OUTTA KANSAS!

I SAY GOD BLESS AMERICA! GOD BLESS AMERICA! I SAY GOD BLESS THIS SACRED LAND!

WHY DID IT TAKE SO LONG FOR HILLARY TO GET ON BOARD????

Charlie Wilson's War   April 24th, 2008 12:15 pm ET

More Debate? we had 21 that is a world record!

Rebecca   April 24th, 2008 12:14 pm ET

Bill Richardson is one of the most honest, thoughful politicians I have ever seen. He's always right on, and proves that again here. His service to this country as well as the world is truly remarkable, and he deserves the respect of the Clinton campaign for it.

Thanks for defending Barack, Bill, and for staying involved! We know that you are supporting him for all the right reasons!!!!

African for Hillary   April 24th, 2008 12:14 pm ET

I am not convinced by the reasons Mr Richardson gave for suddenly supporting Obama .. He seems self serving and low quality man to me.. Mr Carville is spot on..

AZM   April 24th, 2008 12:14 pm ET

It's nice watching so many democrats slamming each other… gotta love the loyalty in the party.

Jen   April 24th, 2008 12:14 pm ET

well said Richardson. The Clinton's believe the democractic party is theirs and therefore they can do whatever they please. No more Clintons in the White House should be America's rallying cry!

Jan From Florida   April 24th, 2008 12:14 pm ET

It's so sad that Richardson only endorsed Obama because he
really thinks Obama will give him the V.P. spot.

Ricjardson may really be in for a big surprise if Clinton is the nominee
or if it turns out to be the dream team ticket with Obama/Clinton
or Clinton/Obama

Richardson will be left out in the cold, yes and he is a Judas.

Johnny Boy   April 24th, 2008 12:14 pm ET

Richardson is RIGHT. ALL OF YOU KNOW IT IN YOUR HEART!!!!

stephany   April 24th, 2008 12:13 pm ET

The Clinton campaign has been acting really immature. We need a reliable adult to run the White House. The Democrate Party is truly divided. This is proof of it. There was a time you respected the older generation. Now, it's the younger generation who has to teach the older generation how to behave and how to speak to one another.
If Hillary really had a solution, she would realize that arguing and name calling and telling false stories is the not a solution but a problem. If she is going to fight for us then she needs to be a responsible adult and learn to be truthful as much as possible.

Linda. Boston, MA   April 24th, 2008 12:13 pm ET

That's EXACTLY how they are acting – like they own the Democratic party and that she is somehow entitled to the Presidency. I guess somewhere along the way they forgot that the Democratic party is fundamentally based on democracy.

Kate   April 24th, 2008 12:13 pm ET

I'm not a fan of Richardson but I agree with his statements. I feel the supporters of Hillary are doing so based soley on her husband's presidential legacy. Hillary is not Bill. Living in the White house does not equal experience. Riding the coattails of your politically powerful spouse, does not equal experience. She has lied repeatedly throughout this campaign, resorted to Republican fear tactics, and even today showed just how arrogant she is. To declare yourself the winner of the popular vote before any legitimate process has taken place, is downright laughable. Who really wants to have the Bush-Clinton families in control of this country for another 4 years?

gerard morei   April 24th, 2008 12:12 pm ET

Richardson is realy a full time flipper, he only look for a good possition for him and doesn't care about the rest of the people, specially about his own community, the Spanish Community. His State vote for Clinton and him is going against his own State will. He better have a job with Obama if Obama wins otherwise he will be unemployed for long time,he is done with the Spanish Community and he realy is like Judas,period.
Hillary for President 2009!!
THE PEOPLE'S CHOICE

Michael   April 24th, 2008 12:12 pm ET

If the truth hurts….

No more dynasty's in America..especially in the White House.

mike   April 24th, 2008 12:12 pm ET

Carville and the Clintons continue to prove Richardson's point. They have this attitude of entitlement to the presidency. While the defections of previous Clinton supporters may be hurtful, that is politics, as the Clintons love to say. When it suits them to play political games they justify it. When it works against them, they whine and complain. Carville needs to give this one up.

Jeff - Dallas   April 24th, 2008 12:11 pm ET

Gov. Richardson has it right. The country needs a fresh start. The Clintons are not the right choice for what our country needs. It took strong personal convictions for Richardson to do what is right and endorse Obama.
Carville got it wrong. Richardson is not a "Judas", nor a "Benedict Arnold". Richardson is a PATRIOT who made a difficult personal decision for what he believes is the correct direction for the country.

Independent Thinker   April 24th, 2008 12:11 pm ET

I used to be a fan of Richardson's. Now I think "Judas" is a generous way of defining him. He was a nobody before the Clintons gave him prestige. Now he's back to being a nobody again, even to this Hispanic-American!

jb   April 24th, 2008 12:10 pm ET

How many faces does richardson have?

Mel   April 24th, 2008 12:10 pm ET

I am proud of the way Carville conducted himself. I am disappointed in Richardson. For one, Carville never talked against Obama. Richardson make negative statements against Clinton. Now, that's disappointing. Carville said that, although he supports Clinton, he would absolutely support Obama, if Obama gets the nomination. Richardson NEVER said that he would work for Clinton if she gets the nomination. Based on the way Richardson performed in the discussion, I agree with Carville's initial characterization of Richardson .

Andrea   April 24th, 2008 12:09 pm ET

Please Richardson! you are such a pathetic opportunist and I will be so happy to see that you don't get reelected. How could they be "clinging to the throne' when the country is voting for her? It is like you are just writing off half the voting public by saying that!

Michelle   April 24th, 2008 12:09 pm ET

No more debates! I know it's good for ratings (as Carville kept pumping) but it's not good for the Democratic party. Hold your ground, Obama!

Richardson, you rock! God bless you!

I'm wondering how the U.S. could criticize other countries for racial injustices (racial cleansing, racial suppression, racial bias, etc.) if the new president in 2008 (and this would be my worst nightmare) was Billary Clinton…a candidate(s) who won by inciting racial bias and divided the country along the lines of race, gender, economics and religious culture. That will be some diplomatic calling card and give us just about zero credibility in the eyes of the world.

The only way we can reclaim the disaster of the Bush/Clinton legacy and regain some respect in the world is by showing we are a true democracy (a melting pot that promotes freedom and values all citizens) in which a bi-racial man (who is incidently also the best qualified presidential candidate for the job I have ever had the honor of voting for in my lifetime) can be elected president.

Jeff Radun   April 24th, 2008 12:08 pm ET

Clinging is a word that he shouldn't be using.
Sounds familiar
The candidate he is supporting said the same thing about many of Hillary's supporters.
If Obama wins and wants to have the people supporting Hillay to support him I the fall I would have the back stabing Richardson not say to much negative about Hillay's supporters weather they are close to her or just the people voting for her.
The people who voted in PA for her are not clinging as Mr Richardson and Mr Obama point out.

Xavier, Saint Louis, Missouri   April 24th, 2008 12:08 pm ET

I have to agree with Richardson. Clinton and Obama agreed to follow the rules of the DNC before this race started. YOU CAN NOT CHANGE THE RULES OF A GAME ONCE THE GAME HAS STARTED. This is just another desperation move by the Clintons; do whatever it takes to win. Please! This game is over and all Democrats should support Obama so we can defeat McCain in November. Case closed!

Mekki   April 24th, 2008 12:07 pm ET

WELL SAID RICHARDSON.
CARVILLE NEEDS TO SHUT UP AND MOVE ON. HIS WIFE IS A Republican strategist and i am wondering what's carville intension here.
he add more hate to this campaign and at the end he has nothing to lose, he gain both ways !!
SO PLEASE CARVILLE < THINK BEFORE YOU TALK.

Michael G Ventura, CA   April 24th, 2008 12:07 pm ET

Richardson v Carville- James Carville is not a man of reason. He is funny, knowledgable, and most of all the politician's politician.
Gov. Richardson hit the nail on the head! And it's appreciated.
The debate issue is ludicrous. There have been 21 debates and no one who saw them can question their stands on the issues.
Carville wants to play American Gladiator with the election and Barack Obama doesn't NEED to play that game. HE is the front runner. Period.

Alfredo   April 24th, 2008 12:07 pm ET

Suddenly Bill Richardson showed up in CNN after Obama lost Pennsylvannia. Why! Are you afraid Hilalry is winning. You should worry and that is what you deserve you selfish and traitor.

Great   April 24th, 2008 12:07 pm ET

Hillary should give Democrats a break and drop out…. what is she trying to prove here? The country will break into racial riots if the nomination is stolen from an African-American and given to a white elite. There is no way she can get the nomination, so she should cool off and take a trip to Hawaii :) (where Obama was born, incidentally)

Jack Mpls   April 24th, 2008 12:06 pm ET

Richardson is really worthless, banking on Obama after his own state voted and guess what he did it for his own progression in his career otherwise why did he do it. It is obvious the latino vote is still for Hillary, it just makes Richardson look even worse for that.

Madison , PA   April 24th, 2008 12:06 pm ET

Richardson is right… THIS IS NOT THE DYNASTY…We are tired of BUSH- CLINTON -BUSH… No more CLINTON
Better McCain or Obama.

Sharon Minnesota   April 24th, 2008 12:06 pm ET

I watched some of this but it was too painful to continue to the end. OMG, is this fight ever going to end

Obama, please drop out so we can get on with winning in November with Hillary,

Chris Banner   April 24th, 2008 12:06 pm ET

It doesn't make any sense to see two democrats destroying each other on Larry King,…. This is how far our party has gone, really?
I believe that it is time for Change, that CLinton should not only step down, but also appologise for all her antics towards Obama.
But I guess she won't, given that the "dynasty" has to rule…. By the way we live in a free country with lots of freedom of speech, so Carville had the right to say what he said even though he was wrong to compare Richardson to Juda.
My point is Richardson had the right to support Obama …So Carville should just get on with his own business and let other people express their opinions..

Ann   April 24th, 2008 12:06 pm ET

Bill Richardson is a disappointment. A mediocre man.

Justin   April 24th, 2008 12:05 pm ET

Nice Richardson, take that SOB down.

Harvey, Tampa, FL   April 24th, 2008 12:05 pm ET

I saw this on TV and I came away with two things:

1) Carville couldn't seem to look King or the TV viewers in the eye.
2) Carville comes across as condescending, and uninterested in any counterpoint to his statements. He also looked "sour" where Richardson looked upbeat and interested in what was being said.

Richardson was very likeable and I felt comfortable with him. I found Carville to be extremely arrogant and unpleasant.

gerry   April 24th, 2008 12:05 pm ET

Richardson is right. All one hears from the Clinton campagin is spin, spin, spin

T in Kzoo   April 24th, 2008 12:04 pm ET

Honestly CNN, I'm tired of all the "clashing," the "bashing," and the "CNN in the Rumble (oops, I meant election) Center," especially when it's only helping McCain.

Tell the Democrats to stop tearing each other up and focus that energy on McCain like we used to. If this doesn't happen soon, the Democrats will be forever known for snatching defeat out of the jaws of victory.

Dems 08

Edd   April 24th, 2008 12:04 pm ET

To Richardson the traitor: It is actually called "having the gratitude to all the good things the CLINTON's have done to your career" . You made the wrong choice, the LATINO Community hates you since you have betrayed them! They voted HILLARY in all Latino community states and you did the exact opposite, sot it is not only a betrayal to the CLINTONS but to the Latino Community as well. Such a shame!!!!! Any yeah, you shoudl grow your beard longer, to repent for your sins!

JJ   April 24th, 2008 12:04 pm ET

Hillary clinton needs to understand the Presidency is not a family property

momma obama   April 24th, 2008 12:03 pm ET

Dear Mr. Richardson
Thank you THank you Thank you. I think you have finally said, you said something everyone is so afraid to say even mention.

I am very proud of you. None is willing to admit the truth and reality. and if one says it one is unpatriotic, or disrespectful or gets call a name by the billary supporters.

the reality is that we have a democracy, however, the clinton and the followers want us to have a dynasty at whatever cost. The clintons have turned to use every tactic in the Republican book and worst. You know I have much respect for Senator McCain, he is very honest and very respectful which I know is not valued now a days specially with the media. Also Senator Obama, very respectful and honest and he while he tries to not give in to the old same old billary's stuff, the media presses for that . this whole thing reminds me of people magazine and their obsession over britney s. it is the same with the media including cnn and the clintons. the news have become sort of tabloids via tv.

I just wanted to thank you for telling the truth without fear and knowingly that they will come after you…………..clintons and their network.

Deb   April 24th, 2008 12:03 pm ET

I have a lot of respect for Gov Richardson, but last night I found his arguments and statements on larry King ridiculous. I think Richardson would have been better served by staying nuetral and seeing who took the nomination since his state supported Mrs. Clinton and he would have been well positioned to be a VP choice.

Mike   April 24th, 2008 12:03 pm ET

I wish Carville & Richardson were running against each other!

I Love Carvilles quick wit plus he is a political genius.

Hey Richardson, shave that Grizzly Adams beard won't you, you look ridiculous!

Go Hillary!!!!

stacy   April 24th, 2008 12:03 pm ET

thought Mr. Richardson did a very poor showing in trying to back his
cause. Carville is tough and usually correct.

Julie   April 24th, 2008 12:02 pm ET

We are clinging to our throne ;the country; and our guns and our religion. because we want to keep them! Obama would like to see us lose them. end of story!

frank   April 24th, 2008 12:02 pm ET

Bill Richardson acted like an impartial judge ready to save the democratic party from derailing in the midst of negative and selfish campaign of the Clintons. I often wonder whether the Clintons really love the democratic party or pretend to be so!

Nancy   April 24th, 2008 12:02 pm ET

OBAMA – RICHARDSON '08

Concerned Democrat   April 24th, 2008 12:02 pm ET

I think Gov. Richardson should look up the definition of a dynasty. I don't think that because her husband was president that Mrs. Clinton thinks they are a dynasty. Now if you look at the Kennedy family, there is a family who believe they are a dynast, clinging to a throne. To qualify as a dynasty there must be multiple generations in power.

If I were Obama I would be so proud to have the endorsement of another person who doesn't know what they are talking about.

Great   April 24th, 2008 12:01 pm ET

Carville reminds me of Snape, the only difference being that Snape was actually on the good side.

Kansas Veteran   April 24th, 2008 12:01 pm ET

What's the matter Bill didn't Hillary offer a good enough job in the dynasty that you were so much a part of, sour grapes.

Jessica   April 24th, 2008 12:00 pm ET

Refering to Richardson as Judas implies that Carville is relating Hillary Clinton to Jesus…

Thou shalt not worship false idols.

That can't make faithful Christians too happy with Carville and Clinton.

Bob, NY   April 24th, 2008 12:00 pm ET

The entire power hungry DNC leadership has lost it's mind. And focus on the people's work..

An American in Canada   April 24th, 2008 12:00 pm ET

RICHARDSON SAID “They feel they’re a dynasty. They’re clinging to the throne,” Richardson added.

CAN YOU BELIEVE THAT, HE HAS TAKEN THE PLUNGE AND HAS PARTAKEN IN THE OBAMA KOOL-AID.

A DYNASTY {LOL}

THE THRONE {LOL}

RICHARDSON YOU ARE THE ONE THAT IS CLINGING, CLINGING TO OBAMA FOR A POSITION (IF HE WINS) IN THE CABINET….

ONCE A BETRAYER ALWAYS A BETRAYER
AND OBAMA WOULD NOT HAVE A PERSON LIKE YOU
CLOSE TO HIS THRONE! {LOL}

Quinn - PA   April 24th, 2008 12:00 pm ET

It was Okay when he was the Clinton's Court Jester!

Now he's looking for a place in the Obama kingdom!

Ron, TX   April 24th, 2008 11:59 am ET

Richardson is ten times the man Carville will ever be…

It's hard to take someone like Carville, who is a self-admitted Clinton crony, seriously when they argue in favor of Clinton…

Bridgette   April 24th, 2008 11:59 am ET

These politicians don't own loyalty to each other they owe it to the American people. And I think it is hypocritical to have James Carville on a show as an analyst between the Clinton's and anyone he won't be bias. They are now back to the FL & MI story. She is a looser. I once supported her and actually voted for her. I am glad I have a chance to correct that in November when Obama is the nominee.

Jessica   April 24th, 2008 11:59 am ET

Its hilarious that Hillary is trying to say she has the popular vote, counting Michigan and Florida, when Obama wasn't even ON the ballot in Michigan and didn't campaign in Florida, because he, and the other Dem candidates, actually stayed true to their word and FOLLOWED THE RULES. Keep dreaming and clinging Hillary, those delegates are never going to get seated.

LifeLongDemocrat   April 24th, 2008 11:59 am ET

Regardless of who you're supporting it will be disturbing if the nominee only has half of the Democratic vote. Can he or she bring the other half into the fold? I think not making a nice trek for McCain to 1600 Pennsykvania Av!

Hillary can bring it all together!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!2008 and 2012!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Kevin Callahan   April 24th, 2008 11:58 am ET

Way to go guys!

2008… yet again, our leaders snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room. Download this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

Follow us on Twitter

CNN on TwitterGet Ticker updates the moment they appear online via the Web, SMS, or instant messages.
Follow politicalticker

Categories
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. All comments should be relevant to the topic and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. You are solely responsible for your own comments, the consequences of posting those comments, and the consequences of any reliance by you on the comments of others. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying and other information you provide via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2008 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com VIP