April 27, 2008
Posted: 04:00 PM ET

From
ALT TEXT

(CNN) — Hillary Clinton's big win in Pennsylvania on Tuesday kept the New York senator's hopes alive as she and fellow candidate Sen. Barack Obama continue to campaign for the next two upcoming primaries in Indiana and North Carolina. With both campaigns still in full swing and no immediate end in sight, the Sunday morning talk shows hashed out the current stats with strategists, surrogates, party leaders, and even one of the candidates, in an effort to answer the question: Who's leading the race for the Democratic nomination?

Indiana Senator Evan Bayh, a backer of Sen. Hillary Clinton, and former Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, a supporter of Sen. Barack Obama, stopped by ABC's "This Week" to talk campaign politics. Sen. Bayh made the case for looking at the popular vote instead of the delegate count to determine a frontrunner. "The most important thing to look at is the aggregate popular vote. The pledged delegates are important, but they are just intermediaries representing the people themselves," he said. But Daschle argued that examining only the popular vote leaves out a large segment of the Democratic voting population, the caucuses. "That basically says to all caucus states who don't keep track of the popular vote per se that you don't count," Daschle said.

*******

It was a Senator showdown on CNN's "Late Edition" this week between Clinton supporter Sen. Charles Schumer (D-New York) and Obama backer Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Missouri). Sen. Schumer interpreted Clinton's Pennsylvania win as a change in the tide. "Hillary Clinton now has the momentum," he said to CNN's Wolf Blitzer. But Sen. McCaskill disputed Schumer's assertions. "If you drill down and look at the superdelegate race, right now, you see where the momentum is," referring to Obama's surge in superdelegates in the past week despite his loss in Pennsylvania.

*****

CBS' "Face the Nation" featured a surprisingly subdued conversation between Obama strategist David Axelrod and Clinton advisor Howard Wolfson. While Wolfson asserted that Obama's failure to capture the blue-collar vote is a detriment to his general election prospects, Axelrod reminded viewers of Sen. Clinton's status as the inevitable nominee just a few months ago. "We won two-thirds of the primaries and caucuses that have taken place.How do you go from inevitable nominee to not winning two-thirds of the primary?" he asked moderator Bob Schieffer.

******

On NBC's "Meet the Press," Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean dismissed an argument made by Clinton supporter Gov. Ed Rendell that the popular vote is a better indication of the lead than pledged delegates because they are "elected in a very undemocratic way" as the Pennsylvania governor put it. "I don't agree with it," Dean responded to host Tim Russert. He later continued that the rules "have been in place for the last 25 years. That's what we've got to go by, whether you like the rules or you don't like the rules."

******

The final word went to Sen. Barack Obama, who appeared on "Fox News Sunday" with host Chris Wallace. The senator from Illinois put his Pennsylvania loss in perspective. "It's not like I've been winning in states that only have either black voters or Chablis-drinking, you know, limousine liberals," he told Wallace. "There's a reason why we won twice as many states and won more delegates and won a larger popular vote."

Filed under: Sunday Roundup


meg morgan   April 27th, 2008 8:59 pm ET

Poor former Sen. Daschle–he is so shaken by his lose of his Sen. spot that is does not think clearly–or maybe he lost his Sen race BECAUSE he does not think clearly –Anyway,if that communicator is the best Obama can do, it is not right for our country and its future

tom, Boston   April 27th, 2008 8:30 pm ET

We know who's leading, CNN,

despite your relentless attempt to misinform and mislead us.

mitch from ark.   April 27th, 2008 7:58 pm ET

she's not leading in the popular vote ,anyway.she cannot rightfully win this nomination,but is willing to put her own party at risk,to fullfill her own greed for power.i'm glad i remained independent.obama '08

inewstube.com   April 27th, 2008 7:54 pm ET

It seemed like Wallace was really trying to help out Obama with some of his answers about how to appeal to "blue collar voters". Overall, a pretty tame interview.

Jeff   April 27th, 2008 7:49 pm ET

The popular vote argument is weak.

1. Clinton is using numbers from MI and FL, both states don't count.
2. The Democrtic nominee needs 2025 delegates to win, not a specified or higher number of individual votes.

That being said perhaps the rules are flawed, but change them before the next time,…not in the middle of the contest.

Allen In NC   April 27th, 2008 7:27 pm ET

We are going to have to check with hillary on that one… It's her race…. ask her bet she says she is…. LOL…. ;)

Vig   April 27th, 2008 7:21 pm ET

I don't want someone who is Mr. Congeniality dealing with the likes of the Bin Laden's around the world. We finally are able to see the beginning of the end of the Bush years, Bush who everyone wanted to have beer with. Sorry, I've had enough of Mr. Nice Guys.

Ben   April 27th, 2008 7:19 pm ET

Hillary has spent the last two months saying "count all the votes". Now, she's saying "Don't count the votes in Iowa, Maine, Nevada or Washington". Also, only count MY votes in Michigan. Don't count Obama's votes at all.

What a hypocrite.

SLO Bear   April 27th, 2008 7:16 pm ET

It's time for the Clintons to stop trying to jam the "I" in team; please, please be good losers.

polanco from NJ   April 27th, 2008 7:08 pm ET

Just remember senators is either Ms Clinton or Mr Mccain
NOBAMA !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

jimmy vekmen   April 27th, 2008 7:08 pm ET

MCCASKILLE'S MINISCULE EVALUATION OF MISSOURI VOTE FOR OBAMA IS NOT GOING TO STAND UP IN THE GENERAL ELECTION.
THAT WIN WAS BEFORE OBAMA'S PASTOR PROBLEMS

American   April 27th, 2008 7:07 pm ET

hillary is losing, obama is winning.

lets fouse on the G.Bush The Third,

Ben   April 27th, 2008 7:07 pm ET

I can't wait until Hillary is gone…

love2008   April 27th, 2008 7:06 pm ET

No need. None of my comments ever get posted.

Molly   April 27th, 2008 6:53 pm ET

IF OBama is so great - and going to change our country - WHY can't he clean up the crime and killings in Chicago - his own home town?
He needs to go back home and clean up his town/state before he even thinks he can "fix" America!

GO HILLARY -YES YOU WILL!
Obma is all Talk No Action.

Red October   April 27th, 2008 6:53 pm ET

slow day eh

Blackout   April 27th, 2008 6:46 pm ET

Get ready for the "American blackout 2008″ in November!
It doesn't matter if Hillary wins the Democratic election she will not win the presidential election. Millions of African-American votes will "magical " disappear.

Fazio   April 27th, 2008 6:44 pm ET

Hillary's surrogates will do anything to spin, twist and manipulate the perception that she is ahead. Interestingly, though, their contention that she is ahead in the popular vote includes the rogue primaries held in Florida and Michigan — races in which not all candidates names were on the ballots, and were recognized by all candidates at the onset, not to count.

You can't have it both ways Hillary.

So stop your lies and false spin. The American people are smarter than you think.

This conduct, however, is telling of the conduct of the Hillary camp throughout the race - lies, manipulation and distortions for power at any cost…

Drop out now Hillary. For the unity of the Democratic party.

ross   April 27th, 2008 6:43 pm ET

how does barack obama have time to go on fox news but he doesn't have time to have a real debate with hillary clinton? that doesn't make sense to me. it seems like if he is taking time away from meeting with voters he could take time to have one more debate.

Sara from Arizona   April 27th, 2008 6:32 pm ET

Big win???OBAMA 08′

Divine inspired race   April 27th, 2008 6:27 pm ET

Every so often in the history of mankind the universe sends him a blessing. We have that in Obama. Along with that blessing evil rears it's ugly head, we have that in Clinton. Furtunately goodness always has the last word.

Cora Portland, Oregon   April 27th, 2008 6:27 pm ET

OBAMA '08!!

Grif   April 27th, 2008 6:25 pm ET

Well if you are??? I'm afraid Obama will have..l The Love Sick Blue's, come November.. If not before… Bias will get you Nowhere….

Alice   April 27th, 2008 6:24 pm ET

Obama is ahead in the delegate count and ahead in the popular vote

what a dumb headline - "who's leading the democratic race?" —
gee, I wonder who that could be

Susan MO   April 27th, 2008 6:23 pm ET

Hillary Clinton should win.

Obama refused for a one on one debate with Clinton.

The big question is WHY?

He says to get over the 'tik & tak'…………………….but it sounds like he is afraid for another debate.

This is not good for one running for president,

More changing to Clinton.

Grif   April 27th, 2008 6:22 pm ET

No More. You must really be Love Sodden, by the Idiot Obama..

Dan (TX)   April 27th, 2008 6:20 pm ET

Obama is leading by all legal measurements - total delegates. That's all that matters - plain and simple.
Attempts by Clinton to "count" popular vote in states that violated party rules is pure wishful thinking on her part. She may as well count votes by people in other countries as well - for all the good it does her.
If the Democratic party abides by its rules and the candidates abide by their written statements, this primary will be decided by the superdelegate votes.
Wonder if it'll go down that way or not……

Wayne   April 27th, 2008 6:20 pm ET

Who's leading?. What a ludicrous question.

politics of fear   April 27th, 2008 6:11 pm ET

With just one more advantage- getting the SDs to vote for Obama out of fear of inciting racial tensions- Obama will finally steal the nomination. The Obamas have really skillfully used race to divide the party. Politics of fear?

Whew… wouldn't want the AA to not vote or the newbies to stay home.

Go Obama.

who cares   April 27th, 2008 6:07 pm ET

You knocked the best candidate to loser's place.

The guy left standing can't win.

So we democrats can feel good about the half-black guy getting the nomination.

Price to pay? Losing in Nov.

Dee from Texas   April 27th, 2008 6:05 pm ET

What kind of question is that. You are the media and if you don't know who's leading the Democratic race, why would you be asking laymen.

people's choice   April 27th, 2008 6:05 pm ET

When all is said and done… Hillary wins.

She suffered all the handicaps and Obama was given all the advantages.

Ilona Proud Canadian   April 27th, 2008 6:03 pm ET

Where is everyone?

peter pan   April 27th, 2008 6:01 pm ET

billary is losing, obama is winning.

its time to fouse on G. Bush the Third!

kick harder   April 27th, 2008 6:01 pm ET

Before or after the DNC, Howard Dean, the party leaders, the celebrities and the media swiftboated her?

To most of us, Hillary is the winner.

Always was and always will be.

kick harder   April 27th, 2008 5:59 pm ET

He kicked the good woman until she fell behind, then relaxed just a bit and she came roaring back.

So now he is back to kicking, bashing, lying, and playing the race card.

She is the winner no matter the outcome since the deck- or should I say the bandwagon- was stacked against her.

BL / New York   April 27th, 2008 5:59 pm ET

I can not wait to NOT vote for Obama.

by cheating   April 27th, 2008 5:57 pm ET

By cheating, having the media ignore that you are playing dirty, by strategic playing of the race card (not fearmongering), thugging at caucuses, throwing away the votes of Fl and Mi- and inciting hatred, Obama is ahead by a nose.

On a level playing field- Hillary would have trounced him by now.

Keep kicking her, she ain't dead yet.

fair play   April 27th, 2008 5:53 pm ET

Hillary Clinton is if you take away all the pro-Obama advantages.

Stephan David   April 27th, 2008 5:53 pm ET

How come Bill Moyer and Rev. Wright didn't get any press? A man accused of treasonous acts should be allowed to defend himself.

Oh… wait a minute, I thought we were in America. My bad.

jim   April 27th, 2008 5:51 pm ET

obama for president
pure and simple

Stephan David   April 27th, 2008 5:47 pm ET

Who's leading? The organizations who are getting filthy rich off of these campaigns, that's who!

Obama 08   April 27th, 2008 5:46 pm ET

Clinton trying to change the rules AGAIN…why weren't Dean's comments on Meet The Press included. He restated that the rules are clear that the pledged delegates were the determining factor…

To count Michigan with only one of the names on the ballots is no different than the ballots in communist countries!!

In a democracy we need a leader who plays by the rules!!

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room. Download this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

Follow us on Twitter

CNN on TwitterGet Ticker updates the moment they appear online via the Web, SMS, or instant messages.
Follow politicalticker

Categories
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNN makes reasonable efforts to review all comments prior to posting and CNN may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2008 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com