There are different standards for Obama from the media. No one questions Hillary's judgement for being married to a lying and philandering man for however many years. No one questions her judgement over her dysfunctional life. Nope.

But, put a black man up for President and the rules change.

I'm so sick of it.

Hillary Clinton, "my race or the republicans for four more years, then I will run again. Yes, yes, the plan is working!"

When it looks like Obama is down, they help him out a little!

When it looks like Obama is up, they kick him a little!

Don't be fooled folks. Obama has already won. The media wants to prolonged this race to August.

What else are they going to report on once the Democratic race is over?

The Iraq war? The economy? The environment? Maybe, report something about John McCain? None of these issues sells commerical and ad spaces!

The only candidate in this race with the stamina to withstand all the hatred and disrespect hurled at her from all those vicious, divisive Obama supporters is the one who's tough enough for the most difficult job on the planet. Hillary will be the last one standing.

The truth hurts doesn't it.

NObama.

Hillary in 08.

...and you want to interpret a little dent in his poll numbers as losing support? Right. He leads this contest, and he will secure his party's nomination.

In fact, I'm going to his web site to donate $50 right now.

McCain 08

I find it utterly disgusting after the epic failure of the American public to oust W from office in 04 that we are falling for the same 1990's political sleaze.

At any point Obama could make an issue of the American disgrace that was the Clinton years. Lies upon lies told to the populace with a smile on their face. People call Obama phony, yet we are duped every year by the same used car salesman, whine and moan about it for 3 years, and then vote for them again.

Our problems in the U.S. aren't about hope v experience or good and bad candidates. This is about our crashing undeniable failure to hold our elected representatives accountable. Instead we dance to the puppet masters strings every election cycle.

I know that I speak for a lot of people that do watch CNN and Fox that we've had enough coverage of Wright and all of you should be focused on other important current events that's happening around the world and in our country. Shame on you for dragging this Wright thing on and on.

Senator Obama has moved on, you should too.

While Bill Clinton, Chelsea Clinton, Al Gore, Ed Rendell, Barabara Streisand, Cher, Stan Lee, Brad Pitt, Mike Wallace, Larry King et al may be called to testify and be deposed starting in May, Hillary alone has been protected from explaining her role in her husband’s fraud charges.

In an astonishing ruling by the Judge, Hillary Clinton may NOT be deposed about her role in the illegal solicitation and cover up of the largest contribution made to her Senate campaign until after the presidential election. This is the same contribution Hillary denied knowing about or receiving when Lloyd Grove of the Washington Post asked her specifically about it and her relationship with the donor, Peter Paul, in August 2000. Its the same contribution her finance director David Rosen was criminally tried in May, 2005, or hiding from her and her campaign. Its the same contribution the FEC fined her campaign for hiding from the voters in three false FEC reports by her treasurer between 2000-2006. (www.paulvclinton.com)

Equally surprising as the ruling was the judge’s request to Hillary defense lawyer David Kendall to “say hello to his ( Judge Munoz”) friend Bill, also a partner in Kendall’s law firm”
The decision to shield Hillary Clinton from civil discovery for an additional seven months, thereby delaying a long postponed trial, was made by the judge on his own, without any request by Hillary or her lawyer to make the ruling. No discussion was permitted by Paul’s lawyer before the decision was made. Judge Munoz’ unilateral decision effectively saved the floundering campaign and hopes of Hillary Clinton to win her party’s Presidential nomination!

Had Senator Clinton be forced to testify under oath, as a material witness and beneficiary of the fraud that her husband is being sued for before the Democratic Convention, her remote chances for being nominated the party candidate would have been unquestionably destroyed.

Hillary has never publicly commented on the case in which she was a defendant from 2003-2006. Nor has Hillary ever commented on the videotaped phone call she made to Peter Paul the day he began spending more than $1 million for her Senate campaign, the false statements she made through Howard Wolfson to the Washington Post denying working with Paul or receiving any contributions from him, the sworn Declaration she made under oath where she refused to deny any of Paul’s allegations, the role her White House aide Kelly Craighead played in coordinating Paul’s expenditures and befirending Paul’s Japanese business partner during a White House visit and many other unanswered questions of illegal conduct.

Obama "08!!

Don't be fooled. North Carolina is the big prize, not Indiana. If Hillary can't 'close the deal' and win North Carolina, then this race is over – despite what the media and the Clinton campaign portray.

He jumped into a campaign for which he was NOT prepared – one, by the way, that will be child's play compared to what the winner will face in the race to the general. We've been saying it from the beginning – he's brilliant, but he's unelectable.

In eight years, his vision backed by cabinet experience on Hillary's cabinet and some foreign affairs seasoning, will be irresistible to all.

Hillary '08/12, Obama '16/20!!

If the media wouldn't have been so led astray by the Clintons on these tabloid-esque implications, maybe the voters would've been informed more about the issues rather than fluff. It would be a true dis-service to our country if people elect a President based on this type of disinformative election process.

- is sabre-rattling with Iran. Do we really need another middle eastern war?

- is proposing a gas tax holiday that experts of all stripes say is a "sham" and "pandering"

- would be bringing an impeached president back to the White House, someone she can barely control and has made millions through vague, shady deals

- is willing to destroy the Party by damaging the frontrunner and alienating the Democratic base: African-American voters.

It's incredible how many of you Hillary supporters are fine with the above. I'd love to see someone respond with an intelligent answer that doesn't rely on dragging Obama's name through the racist mud.

Belated Congrats to Candy on her recent accomplishment!!!

That's where you're wrong. It was just ruled last week that Clinton wouldn't have to testify until after the election by a biased judge. Check again.

Sorry about his luck......it ran out!!!

Game is over! Obama is winning!

I'm an Obama supporter, but polls don't mean anything as when it comes to voting they have been proven wrong.

But if we were to believe the polls, they really don't help either candidate. While Senator Obama's is going down, there is no gain for Senator Clinton. That should be disturbing as well. We'll know on Tuesday.