May 10, 2008
Posted: 11:18 AM ET

From
Sen. Hillary Clinton campaigns in West Virginia.
Sen. Hillary Clinton campaigns in West Virginia.

CHARLESTON, West Virginia (CNN) — West Virginians will head to the polls Tuesday for the state's Democratic primary between Sens. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. But what will the vote there really mean after new delegate totals show Obama with a sizable lead?

Some say it could send a sobering message to Obama's Democratic supporters.

West Virginia is expected to go for Clinton big time — and the polls show it.

Clinton has a 43-point advantage over Obama, 66 percent to 23 percent, according to a survey from the American Research Group released Friday.

The poll was conducted after Tuesday's primary results and carries a margin of error of plus or minus 4 percentage points.

"This state is really Hillary Clinton's wheelhouse. It's an older population, socially conservative, blue-collar workers," said Kennie Bass, a political reporter for WCHS in West Virginia.

Read the full story

Filed under: Barack Obama • Hillary Clinton


Mira   May 10th, 2008 1:04 pm ET

The results will mean NOTHING.
WV always goes to to the republicans anyway.
Obama was smart enough to divert his efforts where he knows he will win.

A big Clinton win in West Virginia would not mean anything.

By the way, the race is over, Obama already won. It is time for the Clintons to leave.

more Obama rules   May 10th, 2008 1:04 pm ET

Washington insiders are responsible for the mess we are in. The old style politicians broke our government.

UNLESS they are Ted Kennedy and other elite superdelegates… then they are cool because their votes give Obama the nomination.

Without the votes of Washington Insiders Obama can not win the nomination.

Ponder that.

Ready For "THE END"   May 10th, 2008 1:04 pm ET

What does it mean; it means that Hillary will have won one of the less diverse states in the union. That is not to disparage West Virginians– only to say that blue-collar, White people have been her strongest demographic all along therefore it makes sense that she has such a huge lead. That still isn't any reason for Barack not to be campaigning there. Nevertheless, it will barely dent Barack's delegate lead and if superdelegates keep falling behind him, Hillary may wake up Wednesday to find herself even further behind in the delegate math.

With that said, it is time that we start behaving as USAmericans and not as White, Black, Hispanic, Jewish, Catholic, male, female, blue-collar, white-collar, college-educated, etc. individuals. In case you haven't been paying attention, foreclosures are sweeping the nation and have affected EVERY demographic CNN tracks (to our disadvantage); our infrastructure is crumbling; the price for necessities such as food and fuel are skyrocketing; we are fighting wars on multiple fronts and our military is stretched thin; later this year Medicare will begin paying out more than it takes in (the same is projected to happen to Soc Sec. in 2017). With all of this going on, watching many of you act like high school kids up for the prom queen/king ("I won't vote for her/him because his supporters insulted my candidate…") would be hilarious if it weren't so scary. Wise up people: vote for a candidate because you believe in their policies and that they will improve upon the current conditions. Regardless of who loses, all three candidates are wealthy and elite and you'll never see them at your local bowling alley, bar, shooting range or gas station.

It's time that we remember, for which it stands, the 'Unite' in the United States of America. "United we stand, divided…"; I'm sure you can finish that.

Media Blackout May 15th   May 10th, 2008 1:04 pm ET

Oh….. and that WV primary??

Obama is trying his best to allow Hillary to go out on a high note. Rather than trying to take WV away he will let Hillary win and hopefully she will feel like she's leaving on a high note.

Not sure why many of you are not aware of this since it was the MEDIA who mentioned this 3 days ago….. but a story is a story right?

Ron L   May 10th, 2008 1:04 pm ET

And by the way I also agree with some of the other writers. CNN did increase it's coverage of Hillary that last four weeks. I don't think they wanted her to necessarily win. They just wanted this competition to be as close as possible to keep their viewership up.

I will be VERY HAPPY to see the day our News Media MATURES and realizes by devoting some much time ( an OFTEN EXAGGERATING what is actually happening) to this they do the American public a disservice. We hear very little in regards to the extremely high drop out rate of Americas High School Students and other really important issues.

Tony   May 10th, 2008 1:04 pm ET

"I cannot find one reason why a Democrat would not vote for Obama other than racism "

Statements like the above (from an Obama supporter) are incredible in their arrogance, naivete, and stupidity. I've tended to vote Republican all these years, but I have to tell you that while I find some of what Obama says inspiring, I DO have some reasons other than racism that would keep me from voting for him, namely base of experience.

An issue that has become more and more obvious to me (and others) is the incredible arrogance of Obama supporters, and many Democrats in general. He IS NOT a savior, nor omnipotent, or anything else. He's a candidate. I think many of you Democrats have bottled up your angst for so long that you're allowing it to whip you into a frenzy. Know this: The world is complicated, and your simplistic views of how things will change are most likely NOT going to happen. It's NOT because Republicans are evil nor is George Bush the anti-christ. It's because the world is complicated and the U.S. is filled with people that think only of themselves (liberals are much more this way than conservatives, by the way). Get over yourselves, and realize that pretty much everybody is as smart as you…maybe more so.

Jack - Miami   May 10th, 2008 1:04 pm ET

OOOOOOOO I KNOW ….I KNOW ….PICK ME!!!!

IT IS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR CNN TO PLAY THE ROCKY THEME FOR HRC AND SAY THAT SHE IS THE COMEBACK KID AND OBAMA IS IN TROUBLE AND THE RATINGS WILL STAY UP FOR ANOTHER FEW WEEKS.

RATHER – WHAT CNN SHOULD BE SAYING IS THAT HRC IS PLAYING THE RACE CARD AND IS TEARING THE DNC APART. SHE HAS BECOME A VILE AND DISGUSTING CHARACTER.

WEST VIRGINIA – BEAUTIFUL PLACE BUT YOUR OWN SAKE – CATCH UP!

MC CAIN 08

Kirk   May 10th, 2008 1:04 pm ET

HAPPY MOTHER'S DAY HILLARY !!! " YOU ARE AMERICA'S MOM "
Michigan Mothers For Hillary !!!!!

Dim   May 10th, 2008 1:03 pm ET

What does it mean? At this point, it doens't mean anything.
It's over. Let's start thinking about November.
These are distractions from the real fight with Mc Cain.

Gerry In Toronto   May 10th, 2008 1:03 pm ET

This contest and none of the reamining primaries mean anything, since all Obama needs to confirm the nomination is 35 more pledged delegats.

It's time for all Clinon supporters to join the Obama movement and ready for the November fight against McBush.

LifeLongDemocrat   May 10th, 2008 1:03 pm ET

This means a lot contrary to some of the above. it is a boost for Hillary and her supporters and makes me wonder what the problem is with Obama. The bigger question is what is he going to do to garner the Hillary vote. Haven't heard anything close to addressing that but he isn't the nominee yet.
Obama:
Pick a staunch Hillary supporter for VP if you are the nominee and that would help. Those female Governors who came out for you are not viable candidates. That is why they came out for you but it backfired!

lime   May 10th, 2008 1:03 pm ET

It means that Hillary should consider a third party run for the white house. There are 3 partys in play now. The republicans, The Obama supporters, and the Hillary supporters. I believe with states being winner take all, Hillary could rack up alot of electoral votes. I believe she would win NY,PA,NJ,CA,FL,MI,OH,etc. no candidate would reach 270 electoral votes, She is just stronger than Obama.

Marge Hibbing Mn   May 10th, 2008 1:03 pm ET

It will show the Democrats in DC who are drooling over obama that this country doesn't want him. Not the rock bed base the ones who have supported this party for decades.

Just because the youth are so zoned out by someone they think is a rock star and make more noise and chant and wave the DNC is drooling, yes drooling thinking they will STAY in the party. They won't. They'll be gone maybe even by November.

There are emails circulating about starting a new branch of the Democrat Party and proposing Hillary as the candidate. We don't want that. We want our branch of the Democratic Party that is splitting to go to McCain and knock the socks off the weak kneed weak butt obama so the drooling members of congress will see the real truth. WE DONT' WANT OBAMA AND WE WON'T GET HIM.

king   May 10th, 2008 1:02 pm ET

United we stand, divided we fall.

A Sobering Message?   May 10th, 2008 1:02 pm ET

Right now Obama is ahead by 164 delegates. Even if West Virginia reduced the gap by 14, Obama would still be ahead by 150. How could that send "a sobering message" to Obama supporters?

JC   May 10th, 2008 1:02 pm ET

Did you see the Republicans are rushing to attack Obama even before Hillary concedes?

I think they are worried about running against Obama.
This tells me that Obama is a more viable nominee than Hillary is.

i'll say it again   May 10th, 2008 1:02 pm ET

It means the race card was overplayed by Obama and we are tired of his divisive sort of unity.

It means "ANYone BUT Clinton" is okay to say- even if you get ugly, nasty and vulgar about it.

But "ANYone BUT Obama" is NOT okay to say. It is apparently RACIST. Even if you simply exercise your right to vote and say it.

joe dirte   May 10th, 2008 1:02 pm ET

if she wins by that margin she will only pick up a difference of 10 delegates, barely even a dent in obama's lead.

please report on paul vs. clinton

Carol   May 10th, 2008 1:01 pm ET

Why is it for the past several months we get fed this line of tripe, "This State is the Important One, it will define the fact that I'm more electable"

All the states decide the President Hillary, even the ones that aren't 100% "white hard working Americans". You know the majority of the states, full of white, black, yellow, brown, and red And guess what we all get to vote, even those who aren't white are hard working and we ALL are important and decide who's President.

John Smith   May 10th, 2008 1:01 pm ET

As a minority, I owe a lot to West Virginia (in particular, WVU). I had all my education and skills that I remain proud of today.

But, I remain deeply disappointed in any state that would vote overwhelmy to send any Clinton back to the White House.

In particular, the Clintons have–
1. been impeached
2. lied consistently to the people of this nation
3. deep dark blood in their hands.

I do not hate the Clintons' I just do not see how they could be "moral leaders" of a nation like this one. God Bless West Virginians; I still love the state that raised me!

Jose   May 10th, 2008 1:01 pm ET

Even if she wins WV by 100%; they only have 28 delegates and if the polls are correct, if she wins by 43%; i.e 63% for Clinton and 37% for Obama. She will have 17 delegates to Obama's 11 delegates; Obama will make up the difference in superdelegates; since the election in NC, he have gotten 9 SD; he will get more before the WV.

Well, in General election, WV only contributes 4 electoral college votes; Obama can let McCain have them and he can easily make up for it else where.

We all know that, not everyone will vote for Obama; Even if Jesus comes today, not everyone will accept him; so stop CNN should stop thinking that it will be a big deal if WV did not vote for Obama.

In all these analysis, you guys forget that 90% AA that are not voting for Hillary or do you think if the nomination is stolen from Obama; the AA will kick it aside and vote for Hillary?

The last time I checked, the most reliable base of the democrats is the AA and if they refuse to vote for Hillary come November because of a perceived injustice, I do not see how she will get the nomination even with her blue collar advantage.

The truth is Obama & Clinton have divided the democrate base and each have a piece, with the other's cooperation and help, one of them is doom to fail come November. The other factor that is not being considered is Obama's attraction of new voters, it is very possible that new voters and huge voters turn-out might be the ones that will tilt the balance in this year's elections.

K   May 10th, 2008 1:01 pm ET

Hillary should run as an Independent. Her own party has betrayed her with idiotic rules such as don't count FL and Michigan even though we want their vote in November. Allocate delegates instead of use a normal winner take all approach that causes no problems. Use undemocratic caucuses where the average working American with a life doesn't have time to sit and scream about politics all day. Howard Dean is a joke and the DNC is the reason we will lose in November. Hillary run as Independent and you will most likely win.

Obama rules   May 10th, 2008 1:01 pm ET

It means "ANYone BUT Clinton" is okay to say- even if you get ugly, nasty and vulgar about it.

But "ANYone BUT Obama" is NOT okay to say. It is apparently RACIST. Even if you simply exercise your right to vote and say it.

emma   May 10th, 2008 1:01 pm ET

I agree with you W. Virginians…Go Hill! We know Obama is an elitest, he made those comments right here in San Francisco. No wonder he is just going to give up and let Hillary win in the next two states. SUPER DELEGATES have to see there is no way we will win in Nov. with Obama, and everyone knows it! HILLARY 08.

M.E.M Kansas city   May 10th, 2008 1:01 pm ET

Look out a hillary meltdown is on it's way. Watch for her performance .

Keith   May 10th, 2008 1:00 pm ET

Remember W. VA. Only I look like Goldilocks the litle White Girl. I am the one who should get all the white votes. What? Iowa and Indiana? Large percentage of white voters supported Obama?! 'What Ever' ! Just Vote right and Vote White! Hillary

Isobe   May 10th, 2008 1:00 pm ET

I think Obama must rush down there, spend Saturday-Tuesday in order to bring the first Clinton volcano win down as quickly as possible. Where he has reached needs a sobering reflection and he needs not take anything for granted.

Clinton never wavers-he has to fight.

R Deutsch   May 10th, 2008 12:59 pm ET

I want more than anything to believe that Barack Obama could be a JFK-esque inspirational leader and then be an effective, 'change agent' to truly change the political culture. I want a President who is not only highly intelligent, tough and courageous, but who will surround themselves with dynamic, change agent 'thought leaders' who will get this country on an upward course. What we need is both Barack and Hillary, and I just pray that they will find a way to combine their talents to help the country through this dark age.

My concern is that there are too powerful of forces in the environment of today's politics such as the industrial lobbying machine and the religious extremists whose selfish issues drive their politics despite the 'burning of Rome' on all of the other more important issues, that will block any real positive change on the big issues. We are likely expecting too much from Barack and his ability to be all that we want him to be. In my 60 years, I have never felt before as I do today that our way of life is in such jeopardy. Bush has driven the US down the path of economic, political, environmental and moral destruction as never before, and his departure from power is overdue and cannot happen soon enough. January seems so far away. We have wasted 8 years in solving the core, fundamental problems with our economy, the environment, society and the world, and we desparately need change.

I remain optimistic (despite the pessimistic tone of my comments) that we will elect new leaders who will have the strength of conviction, the fortitude and the intelligence to lead us out of this wilderness.

sick of hillary   May 10th, 2008 12:59 pm ET

means nothing in the scheme of things…she can't win the nomination no matter how big she wins WV and Kentucky…she will also get a win in PR but lose Oregon, Montana and SD….so the delegate count will basically be a wash and by June 3rd, she will still be trailing by somewhere between 140 – 150 pledged delegates as well as trailing by the number of states won, popular vote and will, by then, be trailing in the super-delegate count…this is over, everyone knows it, even people within her own camp…valiant effort, but it's over Hillary…Hillary supporters need to move on and consider what's best for the party, and switching to McCain just because you don't like Hillary losing to Obama, is not whats best for the party….the divisions within need to come to an end…Hillary supporters, accept this end result…regardless of how big she wins WV or Kentucky, it doesn't matter anymore

Manuel TX   May 10th, 2008 12:59 pm ET

Wow.

It's funny (but so typical) to see all the Obamabots insulting WV residents with their smug superior comments.

It's this attitude that will cost Obama millions of votes in the general election.

Good job guys. :)

Wanda Cummings   May 10th, 2008 12:59 pm ET

I am a disabled vietnam era veteran and I do not understand has the country lost it's mind. Why would anyone ever vote for someone who does not pledge allegiance to our flag that same flag that our troops carry into battle the same one that so many are ready to die for. I recently saw a photo with some of his family and three unknowns and another three unknowns just how much do they know. I am sorry our money clearly reads in god we trust what of this. Commander and chief not for me he's not. I've seen the ceremonies at the tomb of the unknown soldiers how much will change what will the new traditions be and when Obama talks of change I think he means a lot more than anyone realizes. God help us all and especially Hillary Clinton Please! Please! Never Quit! And what is this poverty tax bill and how much is this going to cost me.

ralph benno   May 10th, 2008 12:59 pm ET

The democratic race is not about Obama and more about Hilary. Obama was jus t the tool for the democratic party to topple the Clinton power in the party.

This election is about internal Demcratic party politics. and get back at Bill ploy.

The november election is about poor and rich, white and black, old and young. All gourp are only worry about what is for them.

Obama can not do it.bring all of us together.. ..As a 30 yr democratic..I will vote for Mc Cain . My views are shared by the millions.

Tom   May 10th, 2008 12:59 pm ET

Ok, two more comments after scanning others – Why is it that because West Virginia is comprised of mostly white people who will vote for Hillary, it automatically follows that they are racist? If that's true then aren't blacks in North Carolina, Georgia, Alabama and so on racist also? If that's true, who's the bigger racists and who did this first? Blacks began voting at an 80% -90% clip for Obama LONG before whites voted for Hillary at, what, 60% -40%? WHO's voting race?

Second, I like the question of having a poll to see who would win the Presidential race if all 3 of these candidates were running………………THAT would be interesting – If it's Obama v.s. McCain, it's another lesser of two evils vote and that easily goes to McCain.

JFH   May 10th, 2008 12:59 pm ET

lol, Sounds like a plan to me!!! Hillary Clinton Candidate of the Moderate Party!!!

Leave the Democratic Party to Dean, Kennedy, Kerry and the MOST LIBERAL Senator to loose in November!!!!

I'm there!!!! Hillary '08

dis   May 10th, 2008 12:59 pm ET

It means that low income, hardworking white people who could not go to college DO NOT COUNT.

Only low income hardworking black people who could not go to college should count.

Ranjii   May 10th, 2008 12:59 pm ET

Just think…We can have Hilary as president, Mccain an VP and Rush Limbaugh will be their first appointee to the Supreme court.

Brent   May 10th, 2008 12:59 pm ET

"If not Hillary…then McCain"

I can't think of anything more ridiculous than these comments I read here and elsewhere. If it didn't have consequenses that directly impacted the rest of the world I would say you get what you deserve. But there is nothing rational about voting against your interests just because your angry your candidate didn't win the nomination.

Danny   May 10th, 2008 12:59 pm ET

I disagree with the poll I don't think she have that much lead. So, the point is the poll and the MEDIA just try to play game with Clinton family only. I think she might have about 10 point lead. If Hillary win in WV can
any body call Obama to drop out? because she won 4 of 5 state and 1 draw after WI. I think the MEDIA don't need to hate Clinton family like that.

Handsome IN Everett, WA   May 10th, 2008 12:59 pm ET

CNN is in denial about the Dem primary. Because CNN's favorite candidate is out of touch and losing they pretend as if there is a chance for her. Hilary is done long time ago. It does not matter wther she wins W. Virginia or not. CNN you should know better and let Clinton's dynasty rest in PEACE.

Go Obama '08

Pam   May 10th, 2008 12:58 pm ET

West Virginians are a weird bunch. They have been on the loosing end so long until they just go for the underdog as a way of life. They really don't care about elevating themselves and demonstrate that by being #48 in teacher pay. Why would we expect anymore out of the people in that state? How can they help shape a brighter future for this nation when they haven't made it happen for themselves?

By the way, where in the world is Senator Robert Byrd? I thought he was against the war and voted against it. Why hasn't he stepped forward for Obama? That just tells you a little about the weird attitude of West Virginians.

Michael in MO   May 10th, 2008 12:58 pm ET

This is foolish. Obama cannot win the general in Nov. Do your research – not sound bite surfing. Every legitimate statistic regarding this race shows Senator Clinton the only one to beat McCain and secure the majority of States. If you do not want 4 more yrs. of a Republican presidency, than use your head and vote for Senator Clinton. She is clearly the most qualified individual – black/white/purple – that our party has seen in generations. Senator Obama is not ready – putting him up as the nominee now is throwing away our opportunity in Nov.

I, like millions of democrats, will be forced to vote for McCain as independents in the Fall if he goes forward. We will without question make sure that he does not make it to the presidency. These are not bitter comments of the moment that will wash away over time. These are very real facts folks.

JC   May 10th, 2008 12:58 pm ET

To the other JC:

"JC May 10th, 2008 11:40 am ET

WV will never vote for a black man. That's the bottom line. Older voters are racist and everyone knows it. That's why Hillary takes them."

That is a dangerous statement.
Not all older voters are racists.
Several seniors on CNN blog page are far from it.
Let's not give more fuel to the fire.

Gringo   May 10th, 2008 12:58 pm ET

I love all these Obama people on this board saying that if you don't vote for Obama, you are ignorant, biased and a racist. Dismissing the entire state of West Virginia on those grounds just shows how elitists you morons really are.

PCS / North Carolina   May 10th, 2008 12:58 pm ET

Todd Parks wrote May 10th, 2008 11:28 am ET

"I'm writing here because CNN closed their forum on a previous article related to West Virginia and the upcoming primary but I find it so offensive that because Hillary Clinton is up considerably in West Virginia that it means we (West Virginians) are obviously inbreed, redneck, and racist."

Todd, appreciate your opinion, and you may be correct to some extent. Howevere, the "WHITE" "BLACK"

just asking   May 10th, 2008 12:57 pm ET

It means people are tired of falsely being labeled racist just because they do not think Obama is the best candidate.

If everyone who doesn't vote for Obama is called a racist… what kind of president will he make?

Everytime someone disagrees with him or criticizes him, that person will be called a racist.

That is an unnecessary distraction at this time of crisis.

We know we can call Hillary anything we want and even be ugly and vulgar about it and she still keeps on going. She is not sidetracked and offended whenever people voice a disagreement with her. That is a true leader.

Obama thinks he is perfect and demands that everyone must agree .
Clinton realizes she isn't perfect and goes on doing the best she can for ALL Americans.

Chief lagosboy, NJ   May 10th, 2008 12:57 pm ET

Of cause she should do well in W. Virginia this is Uncle Daddy State. This is Hillary's fan base. I thought it was illegal to inbreed!

Our President Obama 08’ & 12’

CNN   May 10th, 2008 12:56 pm ET

It means that CNN is biased and will not post truthful comments that are NOT pro-Obama- even if they are civil.

Only Hillary haters are allowed to post here.

Mark from Seattle   May 10th, 2008 12:56 pm ET

Wow, what a biased "report"… everyone knows it means nothing if Clinton wins here. The race is over. the delegate lead is insurmountable. Obama would never pick Clinton as a running mate. He is against everything she stands for.

Tim MN.   May 10th, 2008 12:55 pm ET

This is just shocking that the Democratic party regardless of who else is running WILL NOT nominate a woman! The media has taking Hillary to the cleaners and all she has done her ENTIRE adult life has worked tirelessly to better her fellow citizens lives. And her track record shows this , she has no secret agenda she ACTUALLY has AN agenda and the know how to turn this country around and even though I hate this phrase she's been "thrown under the bus". If the Democrats are looking for "new blood" to liven up the party than answer me this. How old is Ted Kennedy? Robert Bryd? John Kerry? and so on and so forth.Shouldn't they start thinking about giving up their seats to "new blood" several of them should have retired 30-40 years ago LITERALLY! I'm having huge yard signs made saying "you didn't nominate Hillary;McCain 08″ I am an Independant and my vote will count and after all is said and done the democrats better watch out when their seats are up for grabs because people don't like their non action and no accomplishment way of running the senate. I feel sorry for Obama letting these old guard Democrats send him to slaughter knowing he can't win against a war hero but they are going to doit only because they are too sexist to nominate a woman shame shame shame. And when obama get annilated in november they will all be pointing at Clinton saying this is her fault what a bunch of crap! Like john Kerry after bush won his second term acting like a spoiled brat well John and Ted if I recall Clinton won your state but you turned your backs on her let's see what your state thinks of you two when your seats are ready to be turned over to your "new blood" I am sure some 19 year old female college student would be a shoe in to replace either of YOU!

west va.& kentucky are just pep rallys   May 10th, 2008 12:55 pm ET

WVA AND KENTUCKY ARE JUST PEP RALLY'S FOR THE CLINTON EGO.

SHE NEEDS TO STEP ASIDE, UNIFY THE PARTY , AND STOP TRYING TO TEAR IT APART.

IF SHE'S THINKING ABOUT ANY KIND OF RUN IN 2012- SHE MIGHT BE VERY WELL RUINING THOSE CHANCES AS WELL!

STEP ASIDE GRACEFULLY SEEMS TO BE IN HILLARY CLINTONS BEST OPTION RIGHT NOW.

AFTER ALL SHE HAS A RE-ELECTION BID COMING UP FOR HER N.Y. SENATE SEAT, AND NEW YORKERS WONT FORGEWT HOW SHE WAS SO DIVISIVE WITHIN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY.

So What   May 10th, 2008 12:55 pm ET

Quoted by the most famous Vice-president Dick Cheney . " So What " . The media need to let it go . Why do you all flip-flop so much just the other day it was Obama has sealed it up . Why keep giving Hillary campaign any false hope . Obama has already said he was going to lose West Virginia by a big spread . What is there something new we need to know . It's already known West Virginia is like a little Pa . Where even before the primary begin . Gov. Rendell said he don't see people from rural town voting for a black man . Is he a Prophet ???? Obama doesn't need to worry about the rest of the primaries he needs to gear up for the Republican attack dogs in the general .

HH   May 10th, 2008 12:55 pm ET

Its over!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Your own news anchors said so, so you can not have it both ways.

Lana, California   May 10th, 2008 12:55 pm ET

Like polls are always accurate anyway. I'll believe the 43% IF it happens. Besides, this was always a given for Clinton since before this thing started, just like NC was a given for Obama many months ago too. Plus, unlike the people running the Clinton campaign, I give the voters in WVA more credit for their intelligence and critical thinking skills. I am sure they will realize that when Obama is the nominee, that he will carry on much of the traditional issues and concerns that Clinton ALSO addresses. I mean really my fellow Democrats – given the choice of Obama or McCain, which person (and party) will follow YOUR values and issues and act on them better? I venture a guess it is not McCain.

The math doesn't add up to a Clinton nomination unless there is some serious political trickery and manipulation going on behind closed doors. I pray for the sake of our party, it does not come to that.

I'm all for Clinton to have one last day in the sun and to get the respect and recognition that is hers. But, after that, let's unite around our presumptive nominee and take back the White House.

Obama 08/12

Eric   May 10th, 2008 12:55 pm ET

The idea of so many whites voting for Hillary Clinton is astonishing for so many reason. One, Barrack Obama has so much in common with the people of some the states. Barrack Obama was not born with a silver spoon in his mouth. Two, African American voted for Bill Clinton, Al gore, John Kerry without regards to whiteness. Third, black has never had a black successful candidate for president like Barrack so of course they going to vote for him higher numbers.

K in TX   May 10th, 2008 12:55 pm ET

It will send a sobering message to Obama supporters that attacking Hillary and her supporters only divides us further and ensures a McCain victory in November. She has the right to continue her campaign so stop your hateful attacks or pay the consequences.

JFH   May 10th, 2008 12:55 pm ET

There seems to be a true irony that now a faction of the Democratic party has taken a page out of the Bush playbook, stop counting votes once your guy is ahead. Is Katherine Harris working for Obama???

Take it to Denver!!! Hillary '08!!

Gringo   May 10th, 2008 12:54 pm ET

Good for Hillary. I've disliked her for 20 years, but compared to Mr. Empty Suit, she looks like Churchill.
All you Obamaistas will wonder what hit you in November. Knowing all the words to Kumbaya isn't gonna cut it in November. Dems are going to shoot themselves in the foot AGAIN !!

Can you say McGovern.

Ian   May 10th, 2008 12:54 pm ET

It means the same as a last place team winning games in the last weekend of the baseball season. Moral victory, sure, but in the long run it doesn't mean much.

John Z.   May 10th, 2008 12:54 pm ET

Sobering message, you bet! Recently Gallop revealed through its polling that Obama has the support of the same coalition of voters, namely, African-Americans and liberal intellectuals, that John Kerry had but lacks the support of white, blue-collar workers. If Kerry couldn't make that coalition work for him four years ago, why does Obama think that it will work for him now? It would be better to go with Clinton who has a broader base of support. But the Democrats aren't very smart, are they?

Th3rdpwr   May 10th, 2008 12:54 pm ET

Oh, for crying out loud! If I have to endure talk of another "critical" state that Senator Obama HAS to capture to win the presidency, I'm going to puke. W.Va. reflects a very specific type of voter concentrated in this particular state. They're no more important than any other demographic in winning the national election. Consequently, W. Va. isn't important specifically, just its type of voters; a demographic which is located throughout numerous areas in this country, along with many other necessary American voters..

ransom   May 10th, 2008 12:54 pm ET

Why such hatred against Mrs. Clinton from people who claim to be staunch Democrats? You are handing the presidency to McCain with this kind of vitriol. And, it seems to me that those ridiculing West Virginians as uneducated, red-necked illiterates should consider leaving the Democratic Party and aligning themselves with another.

Jay in ATL   May 10th, 2008 12:53 pm ET

Hilaary Please drop out of the race, I supported you and hey; you win some, you lose some. There is always 2012 and you need to preserve what decency you have left!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Greg, Phoenix, AZ   May 10th, 2008 12:53 pm ET

Absolutely nothing.

The fact that West Virginia voters would be this out of step with the rest of America doesn't say too much about the fine citizens of WV does it.

Rob-BC Canada   May 10th, 2008 12:53 pm ET

It means the most to cable news.It will no doubt bring out all the pollsters and spin doctors.In the bigger scheme of things it means little.If Obama is allowed to start the Presidential campaigning as soon as possible he will have no difficulty convincing voters by November that the Democratic are the only choice for any hope of a change in America's current financial, social and international problems.By the way, Hillary Clinton has no place in that government.She is currently campaign to undermine Obama's elect ability,contrary to any spin or excuse she presents.

Sean Dunn   May 10th, 2008 12:53 pm ET

What is should mean is that Camp Clinton is recruiting loyal subjects for the fall election of Barack Obama. It should mean that she is starting to weave a story together that will bring the party together to win the White House, Senate and House. She should be building up the 95% overlap between her story and his story. She should go out gracefully – winning WV for teh party.

Unfortunately, what is does mean is that Hillary and Bill are so narcissistic they will put their point of view out there, for all to see, even if it burns everyone around them. Sound familiar? That's right. It's should. It's 1992 -2000 all over again.

Get off the stage, please. It's not yours anymore.

Clinton Supporter   May 10th, 2008 12:52 pm ET

nate – I like your comment – but all one has to do is take a look at these blogs to see the hate-filled comments posted by Obama supporters – sure gonna be tough for Obama in the general election if he is the nominee – I have nothing against him at all (just prefer Hillary) but the majority of his supporters on these blogs are disgusting and have already alienated many Democrats.

thetruth   May 10th, 2008 12:52 pm ET

YES WE CAN, YES WE CAN, WE DID IT WE WONNNNNNNNNNN,

Mark   May 10th, 2008 12:52 pm ET

As my daughter points out from the NY Times, time to reuinte the party and move forward…You all want McSame, join the Republican party and stay there.

stand up   May 10th, 2008 12:52 pm ET

It means the people will not accept a nominee forced on us by the DNC and the democratic party elites and the left wing extremists.

Most democrats- in a FAIR race where all of the votes were counted and where caucus votes were not overweighted- prefer Hillary Clinton.

Tom   May 10th, 2008 12:52 pm ET

Why isn't Obama trying to show he can win over white voters in this state instead of just giving up on it entirely? What does that say about him and his lack of concern for folks in MI and FL as well as WV? This is all fitting right in with the pattern that was established long ago about his character and what he REALLY believes in. I have news for the U.S. citizens – it's not us. Can you imagine Hillary NOT going to North Carolina because everyone said she'd lose there? She went and lost as expected………but she went there knowing that. That's character.

A.M. Saqib   May 10th, 2008 12:51 pm ET

Mr. Bill Schneider whatever it will mean but one thing for sure. Hillary Clinton will have another semi-artificial thing to boast and to create non-sense. Anyhting can be expected from 'Clintons', and what I am saying right now is without prejeduice. You can see yourself, the final outcome is so obvious, and if there was any consideration of the party, Democrats, Hillary Clinton would have bowed gracefully, instead making a most rediculeus argumnent, just to hurt 'Obama'.

I will not hesitate to go that far that she is perhaps using the race by showing that white blue coillar worker are with her; so what. Do you think blue collars workers in United States are only whites? Come one give us a break, Hillary!

On the surface 'Clinton' and particulary former president Bill Clinton, appear to have a very supportive heart for blacks in this country, but if anything this primary election has shown spade as spade.

It is about time 'Hillary' type of people must realize that America is no longer "Black and White'; and some how it is hard to swallow for the older generation.

If anything 'Obama' has brought about is the fact that he can unite the nation, let alone democratic party. Hillary Clinton is making things worse every day and not better.

A.M. Saqib
Houston., Texas

PCS / North Carolina   May 10th, 2008 12:51 pm ET

If she wins big, then she can leave with grace. If not, her political future is in question. There is no way she is going to be the nominee. It is all about her political future and campaign debt. If she continues to bleed Obama, and if he looses in November, then, there is no way she is going to make it in 2012. Remember Edwards in 2004. So there is no guarantee of her coming back, or even Obama coming back in 2012, if DNC dose not get to the white house this time. Because, GOP will sell our country to China, India and the middle East.

cnn rocks   May 10th, 2008 12:50 pm ET

signed,sealed and delivered,
obama 08
cnn,the best political team on tv!

Randy   May 10th, 2008 12:50 pm ET

I'd rather deal with Hillary than Obama. At least if she lies, she does it in plain sight. Obama has fooled everyone with lies wrapped up in talk of unity and commonality. Neither one have anything in common with me but I'd rather live with Hillary's lies over Obama's anyday.

McCain/Huckabee '08

Linda in CA   May 10th, 2008 12:50 pm ET

I admire Hillary for staying in the race to give everyone a chance to vote. She may win W.VA., but it is only because of the demographics of the state. It would be wonderful if the voters read the issues and not just vote for a white woman who has nothing in common with them. Race will always be an issue to some uninformed people. It is sad that color matters.

Independent   May 10th, 2008 12:50 pm ET

Wouldn't it be a shocker if the race were truly tighter? Clinton is still pinning her hope on stealing the election. Not Clinton, Not Anymore. I hope the people in West Virginia look at the person, and not what they promise and pander to. It still wil not help her. Obama is to far ahead. Go Obama 08

mn   May 10th, 2008 12:50 pm ET

i hope she wins…over that obama….although it seems hard…HILLARY 08

Nicole   May 10th, 2008 12:50 pm ET

The trump card Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton held in her faltering bid for president — her support among the superdelegates who can control the fate of the Democratic nomination — began slipping from her grasp on Friday as Senator Barack Obama moved into the lead on this front, with uncommitted delegates declaring their allegiance to him as others deserted her.

Mrs. Clinton publicly vowed to fight on for the nomination while campaigning on Friday in Oregon. But a new, more conciliatory tone crept into her stump speeches, as she shied away from the more spirited attacks on Mr. Obama that characterized her recent primary battles, instead engaging him more gently on the issues while aiming her fire on Senator John McCain of Arizona, the presumptive Republican nominee.

Clinton advisers say attacks on Mr. Obama are no longer enough to change the momentum or the outcome of the nomination race. So continuing to attack him on the campaign trail, at this point, would probably inflict more long-term harm on Mrs. Clinton than on Mr. Obama, her advisers said.

Mr. Obama made his own peace offering to the Clinton camp, albeit a tactical one, suggesting he would be open to helping her retire her campaign debt. “I’d want to have a broad-ranging discussion with Senator Clinton about how I could make her feel good about the process and have her on the team moving forward,” he said. “But as I said, it’s premature right now. She’s still actively running, and we’ve still got business to do right here in Oregon and in other states.”

She is starting to concede the nomination….This is from the NY Times, published today…Let see if CNN has the guts to publish the article

Craig A. Carroll Hastings, MN   May 10th, 2008 12:50 pm ET

I agree with the premise that this contest should tell the Obama zealots that all is not what they believe. W Va. could very well be a harbinger of November. As for Hillary. It's over irregardless of the outcome.

Anna, IL   May 10th, 2008 12:50 pm ET

Bill Schneider's " What might West Virginia's primary mean?" article is truly disgusting. It's no secret to the viewers that Mr.Schneider wants Hillary to be the nominee instead of Obama, but to suggest that Obama needs Hillary is laughable. Have you thought for one second that Obama will need his own supporters in November? Your polls are wrong. There are more Obama supporters who wouldn't vote for Hillary. You, the elite media, are the one who needs a reality check. You are so out of touch with the mood of the country, it's incredible. Hillary has lost all her dignity during past few months. The answer is no, no, NO! What part of "no" do you not understand? Unless you're really campaigning for McCain, it's time for you to rethink your coverage.

BGIV in NC   May 10th, 2008 12:50 pm ET

She is exiting the race with all the tact and grace of a blind, three legged, pregnant yak.

JA Cook   May 10th, 2008 12:49 pm ET

It means that in West Virginia, Hilllary has a stronger appeal. It doesn't change the fact that Obama has received more votes and more delegates nationally.

The largest vote getter would be the most electable. Since Obama has won more states, more delegates and more votes overall, it appears that Hillary is the one who is less electable.

Franky   May 10th, 2008 12:49 pm ET

Man, I just wrote a good comment here. Ohh well….

Anyway, do you know what's the most unfortunate thing about this??? She couldv'e used a win like this VERY, VERY EARLY ON….

And according to Hillary, if white people can trust her and not my boy, then why did she not win as many states to make it competitive???? Ohhh and by the way, what about the young white kid who's 18 or over??? I wonder who he votes for??? Hmmmm, since he's white and young and according to Hillary, he'll probably vote her…but wait a minute, is that true??? I wonder if that's true….

Ricardo Williams   May 10th, 2008 12:49 pm ET

That's OK if Hillary needs a consolidatory victory to heal her bruised ego. She already sealed the votes by making it an issue of race. I just want to remind Hillary that Blacks always voted for Whites in the past. Infact we didn't have a choice, as all the candidates were White.
I hope Hillary gets out of the race after her victory so we can focus on bigger issues rather race. Hillary, Bill, McCain, Rev Wright, Pat Robertson, Fox, CNN are all the same. A deeply engraved hatred fuelled by racism. It is time for Change. We are one people regardless of race, age, beliefs, color, rich, and poor. I hope Cnn posts this one.

K in TX   May 10th, 2008 12:49 pm ET

It will send a sobering message to Obama supporters that attacking Hillary and her supporters only divides us further and ensures a McCain victory in November. She has the right to continue her campaign so stop your hateful attacks or pay the consequences.

Steve   May 10th, 2008 12:49 pm ET

nate May 10th, 2008 11:22 am ET
We at Camp Obama recognize the tremendous support HIllary has and we recognize her impressive capabilities. Our policies and goals are virtually identical and therefore respectfully request all Dems come together around the nominee.

Paul May 10th, 2008 11:22 am ET
It means nothing, just like her promises.
*******
Funny. Nate gets it…Paul doesn't.

Stuart in L.A.   May 10th, 2008 12:49 pm ET

Those who don't want to vote for Obama are doing so because they don't like or bleieve in the magical Obama, not because Hillary is winning or losing. We will either stay home or vote mcCain if he comes out with ideas that we like.

Venus   May 10th, 2008 12:48 pm ET

I forgot to add in my post!

W-Virginia will also mean that you have less money to run your campaign considering you are spending $1-million dollars a day!

So let's see – you have about $31,000-million dollars including the loan of amount $15,000-million dollars you gave to keep your campaign alive – so —–you win W-Virginia and lose the race to the White House!

No thanks Mr and Mrs Pander Bear   May 10th, 2008 12:48 pm ET

it means that Hillary continues to attract voters based on the fact that she is a white femaie. period. people in this country need to grow up a little bit.

Ogechi   May 10th, 2008 12:48 pm ET

It never ceases to amaze me how the "feminist" movement and white power movement always trump common sense in this country.

R.I.F.   May 10th, 2008 12:48 pm ET

Nothing. We know she's going to win big so who cares. What about those states that Obam awon 70% to 30%. Oh yeah, they don't count because Obama won them. This race is over and stop trying to add drama and divide the party CNN.

Ric Shaw   May 10th, 2008 12:48 pm ET

The simple answer to "What might West Virginia's primary mean?" is…nothing. The remaining primaries are simply an exercise in democracy to let everyone have their say, but everyone except Hillary knows and accepts this thing is over. The superdelegates are trickling toward the Obama camp, and that momentum won't be stopped by WV because there was no doubt in anyone's mind Hillary was going to take this state by a significant margin. Of course, she will use this as another futile argument to stay in the race. But hopefully she is just using this win as a way to go out on top and bow out gracefully.

Mary   May 10th, 2008 12:47 pm ET

What will WV mean once its over?

It will just mean 5 primaries are left before this thing is finally over.

While I know that the people from WV are very nice people, whoever wins this or any of the remaining primaries will not change the fact that Obama will have the most pledged delegates.

Enough trying to change the rules or the math or the game.

These rules and the math was agreed to by both parties before the primaries.

Also, whatever happens in the primaries does not really indicate who will win those states in the elections.

IF Hillary doesn't like the rules then she should join in reforming the rules for the future. Again, you can't change the rules once the game is close to over.

Lets unite

conservative   May 10th, 2008 12:47 pm ET

Absolutely nothing! The dems are in a process so bizarre that it defies description! If this process gets their "unqualifieds " in the presidency beware America ! We are in mortal danger as a country and few of the new generation can see it , know it ,or care ! All the libs care about is crowing about their enlightened mensa !

Marjorie Helms, Amherst, NY   May 10th, 2008 12:47 pm ET

What does a West Virginia win mean for Hillary? Why, it means that there's still one state where backward, racist beliefs will still translate into victory for a white candidate! Hillary will put on her best 'blue-collar' face (despite the fact that she's a millionaire many times over), and tell the nice, white voters of WV that they can count of her to protect their jobs. What a crock! She's never worked a day in her life, and she knows that she has to play the race card, yet again, in order to claim that she still belongs in this race. Please, Hillary, come home to New York, where you can continue making promises to us about new jobs!

walt   May 10th, 2008 12:45 pm ET

It means…. nothing!

Women for Obama!   May 10th, 2008 12:45 pm ET

This story is over people! There is no way Hillary can win.

Check the FACTS!!!!! IT is IMPOSSIBLE for her to win-unless she somehow convinces the super delegates-through some ridiculous scheme to overturn the will of the voters and overturn the super delegate pledges-thus completely destroying the party and any chance of the Dems winning the general election….um and I just can't see that happening. It makes NO SENSE for her to stay in. I'm all for women and the movement but you have GOT to know when to fold em. AND if she really does support the party like she claims then she would see what she is doing. At this point it's for purely selfish reasons that she remains.

You know, the sooner her followers wake up to the facts and join the winning team the sooner we can begin to heal America and defeat the Republicans in the general election.

Noah   May 10th, 2008 12:45 pm ET

If Obama loses, it means that he is not the front runner. How is that he is being crowned the nominee when he is still losing major contest.

Superdelegates need to wait till the voting is over and the media is wrong for crowning Obama King when the voting is not over.

Obama can not win without Hillary and Hillary should be the nominee.

lol   May 10th, 2008 12:45 pm ET

go hillary, stay in the race. since the dnc treated you so bad, run as an independent. your supporters will vote for you!

JAMES IN BAMA   May 10th, 2008 12:44 pm ET

A Middle East policy adviser for Barack Obama has left the campaign after acknowledging having held talks with Hamas, FOX News confirms.

The Times newspaper in London first reported Friday that the campaign was severing ties with the adviser, Robert Malley.

Malley said he had been in contact with the Palestinian group, but only through his work for a “conflict resolution think tank,” and not on behalf of the Obama campaign, the newspaper reported.

Obama spokesman Bill Burton told FOX News Malley was “an ancillary adviser who never met with Obama, literally one of hundreds of informal advisers who from time to time offered advice on Middle East policy.”

Another Obama spokesman told The Times Malley “has no formal role in the campaign and he will not play any role in the future.”

Hamas, which is labeled a terrorist organization by the State Department, is a touchy issue for the Obama campaign.

Hamas adviser Ahmed Yousef said in a recent interview, “We like Mr. Obama, we hope that he will win the election,” and presumptive Republican nominee John McCain has poked fun at Obama for the apparent endorsement.

McCain has said he would be Hamas’ “worst nightmare”; he told “The Daily Show’s” Jon Stewart Wednesday that he could “guarantee” Hamas would not endorse him for president.

Obama accused McCain of “losing his bearings” and engaging in a smear campaign for the remarks.

Click here to read the article about the Obama aide in The Times.

FOX News’ Major Garrett contributed to this report.

Zachary   May 10th, 2008 12:44 pm ET

Wow does Hillary control the media or what? Umm this state also has less delegates than Puerto Rico………

Peg   May 10th, 2008 12:44 pm ET

It will not send a sobering message to Obama supporters. We know why he is not campaigning in this "red" state. It's important Hillary bow out gracefully and if she wins W. Virginia and Kentucky big…she'll be able to leave the campaign under postive circumstances. If she continues to "fight" and becomes negative toward Obama, the Supers will weigh in much faster to end this thing once and for all.

Hillary has been a good campaigner and should be allowed to exit on her own time……we should be gracious winners.

barry   May 10th, 2008 12:43 pm ET

What does WV mean?…Nothing…it is much later than you think and IT IS OVER !!! Deal with it….

Asa For Hillary!!!!!   May 10th, 2008 12:43 pm ET

Obama will not stand a chance up against McCain and Hillary will so i think if the democrats really want to win this election, Hillary is their best bet!

lorraine   May 10th, 2008 12:43 pm ET

I hope Hillary gets such a large percentage of the votes that it knocks the wind out of Obama sails, these people in West Virginia are finally showing the rest of the country what others are too laid back to come out and be heard, wake up America we are down to the wire (almost) and Hillary needs your support NOW.

cj   May 10th, 2008 12:43 pm ET

i love politics…….go obama

Rodney   May 10th, 2008 12:42 pm ET

It means nothing. Unless Clinton knows something that may reverse the tide the best thing she can do for the party and America is to stop now and help Obama bring the party together. By her continuing it will only help dividing the party and the Republican.

Larry, Hazleton, Pa   May 10th, 2008 12:42 pm ET

This will allow Mrs. Clinton to leave the race with grace. The voters of W.V. need to remember that the most important thing we do is to make sure that Obama is elected in the fall. It will be awful for all of us if Mr McCain were elected. Hard to imagine 4 more years of BushCheney.

Venus   May 10th, 2008 12:42 pm ET

It would mean that Hillary won the state big time!

It also means another state and we march forward!

This also means – Hillary is closer to getting the door slam on her!

Go Obama!

Jack - Miami   May 10th, 2008 12:42 pm ET

It proves that a good portion of the WV population needs to catch up with this century and not fear change. Their younger generations are suffering and the older ones simply dont care. That is why they cannot attract new business who want a progressive environment to their state. Jobs and economy will never improve in WVa until they want progressive change. BTW – I was born and raised there.

Sean   May 10th, 2008 12:41 pm ET

All things considered, it won't change the reality that Hillary can't come back at this point. She'll win the state, but Obama has some wins coming up soon too. It's still over, and we still need to stop pushing racial divisions and bring the Democratic party together.

Kris In Atlanta   May 10th, 2008 12:40 pm ET

Instead of holding on to ancient racial ideas, West Virginians have an opportunity to be part of history. Truthfully, Obama and Hillary are very much the same ideologically. So why does the state favor Hillary so heavily? Quite simply, race has been the center of much strife in the entire history of the state and it continues to be today. The majority of West Virginians are good people who are blue collar in every way. And if they look closer, they will see that Obama has a lot in common with them. He is a man who knows adversity, challenge, and poverty. He worked his way though college-with no wealthy family or connections to back him up. He worked hard and it apayed off. And wisely, he knew Iraq was a disaster in waiting, which shows he was much wiser than Bush or McCain and stood up for what he believed. He is where he is at today because of the man he made himself into-not because of his spouse. Obama is West Virginia and he is America. And he has my vote in November.

paul oregon   May 10th, 2008 12:40 pm ET

so!!!!!!!! if shes not going to get the nomination whatsthe difference
only the people that support her really care life goes on. hillary needs to think of some one besides of herself.

Jane   May 10th, 2008 12:39 pm ET

She is going to lose very big in Montana in a few weeks, and that will send her crashing back to reality that she's history. Then we won't have to hear anymore about the woman, and she can get on her broom and fly away with her evil flying monkeys, never to be seen or heard from again.

FreshAir   May 10th, 2008 12:39 pm ET

A: Nothing.

Those needing a dose of sobriety would be those thinking this makes any difference. The math is the math is the math is the math is the math. It would be nice if the media could bother to deal with reality before posting such misleading and pointless stories. ITS OVER. Capiche?

Joe   May 10th, 2008 12:39 pm ET

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Bratt   May 10th, 2008 12:39 pm ET

ARG is a unrelible sourse and you know that. They predicted victory for Clinton in Indiana by 17 points and lost in NC for her by 3 %… Nobody trust this group EXCEPT B. Schneider who is one of the biggest Clintons supporter at CNN. Look at other polls released today – the margin is within 10-14 points… and that will give HRC about 15 delegates from 28..Who cares? Meanwhile Barack will have 2024 and the contest will be over even before Oregon, dear Bill Sch.

JAMES IN BAMA   May 10th, 2008 12:39 pm ET

IF THE DEMOCRATS COULD HAVE WON ANY OF THE THREE STATES OF EITHER FLORIDA, OHIO, OR WEST VIRGINIA WE WOULD HAVE WON THE WHITE HOUSE AND PUT OUT G.W. I DONT THINK BARRACK HUSSIEN OBAMA WILL BE ABLE TO WIN ANY OF THOSE STATES. AND CONSIDERING THE SIZE OF OHIO AND FLORIDA EVEN IF HE TOOK A RED STATE LIKE KANSAS OR NEVADA IT WONT MAKE ANY DIFFERENCE BECAUSE OF THE WINNER TAKE ALL WAY IT IS IN NOVEMBER. AND WITH THE WAY HIS CAMPAING HAS HANDLED THE MICHIGAN AND FLORIDA ISSUE HE WILL PROBABLY LOOSE MICHIGAN AS WELL. I AM A LIFE LONG DEMOCRATE WHO IS FIGHTING FOR OUR PARTY IN A RED BUT INCREASINGLY BLUE HUGH. BUT OBAMA SEEMS TO DIVIDE MORE THAN HE UNITES AND HE PULS FROM AL THE WRONG DIRECTIONS.

easy choice   May 10th, 2008 12:38 pm ET

If everyone who doesn't vote for Obama is called a racist… what kind of president will he make?

Everytime someone disagrees with him or criticizes him, that person will be called a racist.

That is an unnecessary distraction at this time of crisis.

We know we can call Hillary anything we want and even be ugly and vulgar about it and she still keeps on going. She is not sidetracked and offended whenever people voice a disagreement with her. That is a true leader.

Obama thinks he is perfect and demands that everyone must agree .
Clinton realizes she isn't perfect and goes on doing the best she can for ALL Americans.

Inevitable   May 10th, 2008 12:38 pm ET

thought small states didn't matter … hmmm ………… she can get 100% of the votes she's still be behind …………….

time for Hilary to quit …………. and rally around Obama ………. to unite the democratic party …….. I'm a 00% sure if Obama was in Hilary's position Hilary would've wanted Obama to quit …………..

NiceSpin   May 10th, 2008 12:37 pm ET

Nice spin CNN. Hillary winning West Virginia means absolutely nothing. The pulse of the country is not centered around a bunch of uneducated miners with almost no diversity in the state. Yes, she'll win. She'll win big and still won't make a dent in Obama's lead. Superdelegates will continue to trickle towards his campaign. Why not do something rare and just report the truth. She'll win West Virginia and Kentucky by large margins and it's too late to mean a single thing except that she gets to leave on the note that she got those votes.

Scot   May 10th, 2008 12:37 pm ET

Huh?

What will West Virginia and Kentucky tell us that we don't already know?

And maybe an Obama resurgence in the West will be a suprise.

Dane Clune   May 10th, 2008 12:37 pm ET

NOTHING!

The Lord Almighty   May 10th, 2008 12:37 pm ET

Are you KIDDING me? IT'S OVER. The people of West Virginia are going to be as important to this election as they always have been. Which is NOT AT ALL.

Joe   May 10th, 2008 12:37 pm ET

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Mary   May 10th, 2008 12:36 pm ET

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZZZZZZZZZZZZ

Peter   May 10th, 2008 12:36 pm ET

It doesn`t mean anything, if Clinton wins with 40% (70-30)which is not that unlikely it means she would net around 12 delegates, that is a huge win but not enough at this point. She could probably win Kentucky with huge margins as well, probably not 40%, I think Obama will campaign harder in Kentucky since it is a bigger state. But still, if she wins with 40% she will net around 21 delegates. Thats 33 total which will cut Obamas total lead from around 165 to 132.
Obama will win Oregon the same day Kentucky votes and he will probably win with 15-20% which will net him 8-10 delegates, Clinton could win Puerto Rico with the same margin, giving her the same net delegate win (8-10).
So you could go in to the last two primaries with Obama ahead with around 130 in the pledged lead, but the problem for Clinton is that Obama will win Montana and South Dakota easily, probably with 15-20% which means Obama will win the pledged delegate lead with 135-140 if everything goes according to the polls.

Clinton would do well in WV if she exceeds expectations, but that means more than 40% win, which could be quite difficult. So, WV doesn`t mean that much since Clinton is expected to win big, to get some momentum should would need to win by more than expected.

Ranjii   May 10th, 2008 12:36 pm ET

I guess this will show her whiteness…….Go MC'Cain

Brad   May 10th, 2008 12:36 pm ET

It means that Hillary didn't hear political analyst John King on Tuesday
night.

OMG   May 10th, 2008 12:36 pm ET

So what. It is a big waste of time for Obama to spend more money and time in WV right now. He will have plenty of time to do that in the fall. It is fine for Hillary to go as she can lay the groundwork for his policies and the Democratic platform there. Obama should be focusing his time and energy on McCain and the Republicans.

Clearly this is a great place for Hillary to do what she can to support the party. Same with KY. Good places for her to lay the groundwork for further campaigning by the Dems in the fall.

Insofar as Clinton vs Obama? It's over, folks. Now everyone should be working for the Party…..I would like to think that is what Hillary is doing.

David   May 10th, 2008 12:35 pm ET

The facts are people make choices between what is available. When it comes in november Hillary Clinton will not be on the ballot. West Virginians will have to choose between Obama and McCain. If they are true democrat they have to choose for Obama.

The suggestion that hard working white people won't vote for Obama, is so silly for Hillary Clinton, because she is just suggesting that all those millions of white people who voted for Obama are lazy.

That's is selfishness.

Deadhead for Obama   May 10th, 2008 12:35 pm ET

I hate to say it, but I actually agree with what some of the Hillary supporters are saying in these blogs about the negative comments coming from fellow Obama supporters. Some of the comments are really going against Obamas message. Theres no need for name calling or bashing, it only brings us down to their level. Let's be the better people, and if that's "elitist", oh well. What's wrong with trying to make things the best they can be, "be all that you can be", haven't I heard that somewhere before. There's nothing unpatriotic about striving for perfection, actually setting a good example. With all that said, this race issue is still a problem that isn't going to go away any time soon. I wish it would but sadly racism still exists in this country, even with all the progress that has been made. As Democrats one and all lets not let an issue that we have fought for so hard, divide us.

Vote Democrat '08

Blayze Kohime   May 10th, 2008 12:35 pm ET

West Virginia's primary means 'x' number of delegates divided up amongst the two candidates. Stop trying to make it more or less than it is. Most people involved here aren't even thinking logically, they're just automatically taking the side of their candidate.

Do the math. CNN provides a handy delegate counter for this, so even you people that don't major in math can do it.

ANDROLOMA, Commerce City, Colorado   May 10th, 2008 12:34 pm ET

Invading West Virginia has got to be a better idea than invading Myanmar.

sick of hillary   May 10th, 2008 12:34 pm ET

means nothing in the scheme of things…she can't win the nomination no matter how big she wins WV and Kentucky…she will also get a win in PR but lose Oregon, Montana and SD….so the delegate count will basically be a wash and by June 3rd, she will still be trailing by somewhere between 140 – 150 pledged delegates as well as trailing by the number of states won, popular vote and will, by then, be trailing in the super-delegate count…this is over, everyone knows it, even people within her own camp…valiant effort, but it's over Hillary…Hillary supporters need to move on and consider what's best for the party, and switching to McCain just because you don't like Hillary losing to Obama, is not whats best for the party….the divisions within need to come to an end…Hillary supporters, accept this end result…regardless of how big she wins WV or Kentucky, it doesn't matter anymore

Dr. Vincent Petrosino   May 10th, 2008 12:34 pm ET

Excuse me, but why don't you just tell the truth about West Virginia? It is a unique state made up of less than 5% African-American folks, its white folks are poorly educated and poorly employed. The whole state is just made to order for the people Hillary has attracted all along. But they resist change just like the rest of the blue collar workers who refuse to listen to the call by young voters who see change as the most important deterrent to this mess created by Bush and his gang. The people in West Virginia, finally, would not vote for Jesus Christ if He was black. Thank God it is the only state in the union with these demographics.

Jason   May 10th, 2008 12:34 pm ET

It will mean that Hillary Clinton just had her best day remaining in the primary race and only gained a net of 12 delegates out of the 150 she is trailing. Obama picked up nearly that many in one day with superdelegates. It will show that the only demographic that Hillary is able to court now is the one the Democrats will not be able to count on in the fall.

Hillary can resign now or get "fired" later, but she can't win . . . with or without the Michigan and Florida delegates counted.

Tom from Atlanta   May 10th, 2008 12:34 pm ET

whatever happens in West Virginia, stays in West Virginia. She should run for senate in West Virginia, NewYork would not be a safe bet for her when her re-election comes around.

Eric in CA   May 10th, 2008 12:34 pm ET

The last sentence of this article doesn't make a lot of sense. Obama should consider adding Clinton to his ticket to win West Virginia? It has 5 electoral votes. The main concern with Clinton, in a lot of voters minds, is her strong negative poll numbers. That could easily scar away plenty of voters to more than erase the WV delegation.

What a win in WV means, really, is another week of fund raising and Super Delegate wooing for Hillary. It means another week of comments on ticker articles along the lines of "she should just disappear" and "I'll vote for McCain before I vote for Obama". I'm kind of tired of the whole thing. I suspect that many of the people who post here are stoking the fire. The kind of people who show up to protests, not because they believe in the movement, but just to throw bricks through windows.

marylee wagerman atlanta,ga   May 10th, 2008 12:34 pm ET

NOTHING CNN

IT WILL MEAN NOTHING

OBAMA 08

Chris from Ohio   May 10th, 2008 12:34 pm ET

An important story within the North Carolina primary that is getting buried, is the North Carolina U.S. Senatorial race. In this competitive race an African American candidate Marcus W. Williams was defeated by a white woman candidate Kay R. Hagan. African Americans overwhelming voted for Hagan over Williams, at the same time they voted for Obama. This clearly suggest that African Americans do not merely vote on the basis of race otherwise Williams would have faired much better. Indeed, black and white North Carolinas recognized that Hagan"s stand on the issues were far better than Williams. They saw race and beyond it.

Sharon - NC   May 10th, 2008 12:33 pm ET

If Hillary takes the majority of the older, white conservative blue collar voters, that's wonderful for her. Same old, same old. However, Obama has brought out multitudes of new voters, young and old, black and white, and has inspired a new interest in our country and its future. I think that's much more remarkable and important to our country than getting the same historical voters and votes. I think it indicates that Americans are finally looking toward the future, instead of looking for what someone can promise them anything (but ultimately never deliver) in order to get their vote at that moment. New and inspired voters represent our future; older, white conservative voters dismiss the future and tend to go for old guard politics and old guard ideas. They are not the future; they are the past. Older, white conservative voters are but a small part of the people in this country. If Hillary wants to hang her hat on them, she should. She is one of them.

Emily   May 10th, 2008 12:33 pm ET

West Virginia doesn't mean anything at this point; it's a state tailor-made for Hillary's conservative side. Here's hoping that the media doesn't paint this as yet another "turning point" in the race, when everyone already knows that Clinton will win big here and it's changing no one's mind…the last thing we need is another fictional turning point.

Allison Marie   May 10th, 2008 12:32 pm ET

This is something the super delegates should look at closely, a lot of voters want Clinton more………..let the process finish & count Florida & Michigan.

Clinton 08/12

Larry Buchas   May 10th, 2008 12:32 pm ET

It means Barack Obama has to make some campaign stops to promote education. Many of his ideas promote the advancement of education from pre-school up through college.

It also means he needs to promote his energy alternatives, including clean coal.

And Barack needs to realize areas such as Huntington, Wheeling, Clarksburg and Morgantown are potential campaign stops waiting to directly hear from him.

Please visit real soon!

Anonymous   May 10th, 2008 12:32 pm ET

Is cnn (clinton network news) trying again to boost their candidate ?
West Virgina's primaries might mean nothing..really nothing…
Please Hillary,drop out instead of using the race card to divide people…

Obama 08

Dave   May 10th, 2008 12:32 pm ET

If you count FL & MI delegates then Clinton would have a delegate lead of 26 and then WV becomes much more important. Obama supporters are really wanting to play down how important these final states really are. I would not be surprised if the courts end up hearing a case about the FL & MI votes. After Obama's big win last week the media was ready to declare him the winner of this race? I think this will be decided for a long time.

John McCain is looking better and better every day. I really don't think either Obama or Clinton will beat him come Nov. This country tends to support Presidents who are in the opposite political party then what is in Congress. Look at the congressional approval ratings….I don't think the country wants to give Congress a veto free president.

Jon   May 10th, 2008 12:32 pm ET

Even if she had 100 percent, it wouldn't make a difference! Not only that, they and the main stream media are acting like Obama can't win any of her base over. There's a lot of time between now and Election Day. In political time, that's an eternity.

Benjamin   May 10th, 2008 12:32 pm ET

The same thing Obama's win in IDAHO said to Clinton's supporters.

Daniel, WV   May 10th, 2008 12:32 pm ET

. . . It means that West Virginia has approximately 28 delegates to be split, give or take a few.

gk   May 10th, 2008 12:31 pm ET

Do not underestimate the power of hope that Obama brings with him. It is stil possible for people in West Viriginia to connect with Sen Obama (and the other way around) once they "get" what he stands for – hopefulness, excitement, energy, possibilities of a bright noble future, goodness, kindness, generosity, justice…and so much more. For those who have very little material comfort, these immeasureables that Obama offers – fills a hunger that is so welcome today, something we have all been waiting for. It might take time and effort to get this message across, but there is still time between now and the general election. Obama foot soldiers – you can do it!! March onwards.

Independent   May 10th, 2008 12:31 pm ET

The poll and "demographics" only show the racial divide emphasized by the Clinton Campaign.

EC   May 10th, 2008 12:31 pm ET

NOT a darn thing. Why are we EVEN playing these foolish game?

We ALL know she's was going to win WVA, but she won't win 100% of the votes!!

So how many total delegates would she win… and how many will he win? Even if Sen. Obama walks away with any number of delegates, he still retains the LEAD.

ARE Americans still in denial? This is NOT news.

dave   May 10th, 2008 12:31 pm ET

It is a demographics thing; I don't understand why Hillary appeals to them. She's pretty much as elite as the come. If the residence of wv took the time to learn the truth, they might see that a candidate that was raised by a mother on food stamps might be more sympathetic to their plight.
The people of WV are good people, I served with one in the Navy, and they are bright. I would urge them to look beyond the rhetoric to the facts.

cameleon116   May 10th, 2008 12:31 pm ET

National polling firm Rasmussen Reports announced on Friday that it will stop polling people about the presidential campaign of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton because her opponent, Sen. Barack Obama, will win the Democratic nomination.

The company's vice president of finance and operations, Michael Boniello, distributed an e-mail stating that after 19 months of tracking the Democratic race, it is now clear that Clinton will remain a close second.

Tim   May 10th, 2008 12:31 pm ET

West Virginia also voted for Bush in 2000 & 2004. How does this send a "sobering message"? ;)

OT: Why does everyone call McCain "McSame"? I think McBush sounds so much cuter (and equally accurate).

DJ   May 10th, 2008 12:30 pm ET

It doesn't mean nothing!! please cnn dont try to spin this into a tight race

Sandy   May 10th, 2008 12:30 pm ET

We've known from the start she'd win this state by a large margin. Big deal.

Clinton thought she had this sewn up. Look at her early ads sitting in one of her rooms at her house. She looks like 'The Queen' .

The way she spent her campaing money, at first, was insane…demanding only the finest of everything…right down to the biggest floral arrangements and the priciest tablecloths. She didn't think she'd ever need to 'watch her pennies'.

She & Bill must be shellshocked that more people prefer Obama instead of her….HOW DARE THEY!

I've been supporting both Clinton's since 1992 and I've had many arguments with friends who couldn't stand them. Well, now I see just what they saw and I can't believe it took me this long to 'get it'.

I've been appalled at the things they've both said and done and I know I'm not alone. I know many people who voted for her earlier and they've all said they regret having voted for her instead of Obama.

She represents the past and Obama represents the future. If the good people of West Virginia and Kentucky don't see it that way, too bad.

GOBAMA '08

Jason from Colorado   May 10th, 2008 12:30 pm ET

Oh no, Hillary might pick up a net gain of say, 9 delegates? Boy, that would be tragic.

OBAMA 08!

David, Silver Spring MD   May 10th, 2008 12:30 pm ET

It means word travels slowly in the West Virginia hills.

It means that some folks there have been beaten down so long they don't believe in their power and capacity to make things right, and therefore are willing to suspend disbelief and listen to Hillary when she promises to make it all right again.

It means that even in the state where John Brown pushed the cause of abolition into the American consciousness some people can't move beyond racial divisions to let us work to solve our common problems.

JC   May 10th, 2008 12:30 pm ET

It just means West Virginia supports Hillary.
However, they are a small state so they don't count in her book.

Meagan   May 10th, 2008 12:29 pm ET

1860 1696 Which number is the largest? Add about 15 or 16 numbers
to each number. Which number is still the largest?

beckleyj   May 10th, 2008 12:29 pm ET

what did SC mean? What did the VA, MD, and DC primaries mean? What did GA, AL mean? Is one landslide victorie at the end of the season more important than six in the middle? I'm still sober . . . what have you been drinking?

David Thinks!   May 10th, 2008 12:29 pm ET

The next few contest will prove that Hillary is the "correct" nominee to represent the "broader" base of the party. Obama is so far in his Oprah-Winfrey Ivory Tower that you've got to wonder if he will give away free cars when he becomes President-and no one will be able to afford the gas for them. Hillary is experienced on the issues that matter to 'average' Americans and knows how to deliver to fix many of the problems facing "the people". Obama and his supporters seem to be on some cheerleading team about "changing" history – but that doesn't put food on the table, secure your job, create new jobs, create healthcare for all etc. Hillary's ideas hit the soul of what the problems and solutions are for the next President while Obama just keeps yapping and droning on like he's trying to win a toast-master's trophy. Go Hillary go..despite the pundits with an agenda.

Milbs   May 10th, 2008 12:28 pm ET

Why is CNN focusing on West Virginia? Is it because it is the only place Clinton is doing well? For balanced reporting, why don't you also include how she's doing in Oregon, or at least how the rest of the primaries are leaning.

Ben   May 10th, 2008 12:28 pm ET

It will mean nothing at this point, although the media is going to do all it can to make this last until the convention.

OBAMA FAN   May 10th, 2008 12:28 pm ET

Nothing!

Ed, Santa Fe, NM   May 10th, 2008 12:28 pm ET

meaningless…. the woman cannot give up the spotlight, can she?

IT'S OVER…. GO HOME, HILLARY

JRC   May 10th, 2008 12:28 pm ET

So, the "little" states only count if HRC wins them?? She needs to make up her mind. I'm not sure Washingon wants or needs a manipulative whiner in the White House.

Sb from West Virginia   May 10th, 2008 12:27 pm ET

I will never vote for Hillary cause she is dividing the country. She and her so call campaigne has played it so dirty i cannot beleive it and now they are trying to divide us on race again

Jack   May 10th, 2008 12:26 pm ET

This won't look good for Obama…..

he needs not just African-Americans and young voters to beat McCain, but he needs to find a way to get Hillary's supporters of Hispanics, Jews, and whites (Catholics and blue-collars)

Anonymous   May 10th, 2008 12:26 pm ET

What might West Virginia's primary mean? That there is a correlation between in-breeding and poor dental hygiene with a proclivity towards racism. Just kidding, it obviously means that Obama is "fundamentally" flawed.

WVguns   May 10th, 2008 12:26 pm ET

The full story says that 70% of West Virginia households own a gun.

If they value their constitutional rights they should vote Obama – NOT CLINTON.

The Prohibition On Confiscation of Firearms law was signed into law October 4, 2006. It prohibits the confiscaton of a firearm during an emergency or major disaster where the possession of such firearm is not prohibited under Federal or State law. In other words the police or federal agencies can't just take your guns citing an emergency as long as you aren't violating any other laws related to gun ownership.

Barack Obama voted for this law, guaranteeing the right to bear and Hillary Clinton voted against.

Hillary Clinton wants to take guns from law-abiding WV voters and Barack Obama will support your right to hunt and bear arms.

Matthew Daye   May 10th, 2008 12:26 pm ET

It means about as much as the gold watch at a retirement party. As far as I've seen, Obama isn't even campaigning there. He's mostly letting her win so she can go out with a bang. Why waste money in states you don't have much of a shot in winning that you don't entirely need?

Honestly, this will be Hillary's last hurrah and he's simply letting her have it.

JT   May 10th, 2008 12:25 pm ET

WV is part of this great nation, and it happens to have much more Clinton's supporters than Obama's. Let their voice be heard, just don't call them harding-working White Americans. It's an insult to harding-working none-white Americans.

Jack Robertson   May 10th, 2008 12:25 pm ET

Mrs. Clinton's expected wins in West Virginia and Kentucky will be pyrrhic victories at best. They will also be a tragic testimony to the 'success' of her decision to play the race card as a last, desperate gamble to salvage a dying campaign. The real tragedy however will not be the deceived voters of either West Virginia or Kentucky or Mrs. Clinton's eventual defeat in her bid for the Democratic nomination. By remaining in the race long past her 'best before' date, and by using tactics of divisiveness at a time when her party needs unity more than ever, Hillary Clinton risks inflicting irreversible damage on the eventual nominee (Senator Obama) and the party's candidates throughout the country in November. Whether by default or by design, her refusal or inability to retire from the race with any semblance of dignity intact sets the stage for a McCain victory – essentially four more years of a costly, losing war and economic policies that have brought the United States to the brink of ruin.

L MIAMI FLORIDA   May 10th, 2008 12:25 pm ET

HILLARY WINNING THE W V WITH A 43 POINTS LEAD MEANS

THAT HILLARY IS STILL A PLAYER. SHE CAN EVEN BE THE

NOMINEE. ESPECIALLY WITH ALL THE INFO THAT IS COMING OUT

ABOUT OBAMA'S PAST AND SCANDALS .

COUNT OUR FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN VOTES .

NO HILLARY ======== NO FREAKIN VOTES

WE WILL STAY HOME

WE DON'T WANT OBAMA . NO WAY JOSE!

HAVING OBAMA AS PRESIDENT IS LIKE HAVING ANOTHER BUSH =========== INEPT INEPT INEPT =================== AND

MORE LIES , SCANDALS , AND COVER UPS ENOUGH OF OBAMA !

NOT TO MENTION== HIS RADICAL WIFE MICHELLE

MICHELLE OBAMA GIVES ME THE CREEPS !

BELIEVE ME I AM A VET BUT I THINK THAT THE OBAMAS ARE TOTALLY RADICAL FOR OUR WAY OF LIFE .

====THIS FLORIDA VETERAN IS FOR HILLARY ALL THE WAY !

WAKE UP AMERICAN S ! THIS GUY OBAMA IS NOT GOOD FOR OUR DEAR COUNTRY ! WAKE UP BEFORE IS TOO LATE !

Susan, PA   May 10th, 2008 12:25 pm ET

BUSH(vp),BUSH(vp),BUSH,CLINTON,CLINTON,BUSH,BUSH
W.Virginians are smart. They know its Clinton's turn.
Whit House only for Bush-Clintons.

GO America.

Amused   May 10th, 2008 12:25 pm ET

The results in the West Virginia primary means nothing. I support the Democratic party as a whole. I have not picked sides for the entirety of the primary. I did not vote in my primary as I am simply waiting for the nominee to emerge, and it's almost guranteed to be Obama. In order for Hillary to catch Barack's delegate total she must win roughly 85% of EVERY state, which is definitely impossible. I respect her choice to give everyone a chance to choose and stay in the primary to the end, but she has two chances to win, slim and none, and slim is packing his bags.

I have also found it quiite amusing to watch everyone who has been posting for the past few months. You all argue and fight over who is better and don't even notice that it's like a tennis match. Obama's supporters blast Hillary for everything she does wrong and vice versa. This is why the Democrats are probably going to, sadly, lose the General Election.

Johnjones   May 10th, 2008 12:24 pm ET

Fine. She'll win West Virginia by a huge amount. And so what? Whatever else you want to say about superdelegates, they can count. The more of them that go to Obama, the more of them that will go to Obama. The supers are the "race to watch" while West Virginia, Kentucky and the rest of the primaries are simply sideshows now.

SteadyFreddie   May 10th, 2008 12:24 pm ET

It means Shrillery has firmly locked in the Mullet vote

Tell me, will David Duke be stumping for her there?

Ken   May 10th, 2008 12:24 pm ET

I think it is wrong of the media to portray Obama as the nominee for the contest is NOT over.

Obama CANNOT beat McCain in November. We need Hillary Clinton to win the nominee, and then she CAN beat McCain in November.

Obama is already acting as if he is the winner, and yet he as well as Clinton do not have the necessary delegates to win. I watched how the media followed him at the House of Representatives yesterday, and I find that his acting as if he were already the President.

Someone should bust Obama's bubble, and let him be able to humble himself and act as a normal person.

Right on Day1   May 10th, 2008 12:24 pm ET

We all know this means very little. Obama can't help but be very aware of the issues blue collar whites have with him. So this primary is about a month too late & about 160 delegates too few.

Obama will reveal another 10-15 super delegates next week. When that happens it will blunt any notions that WV had any significance.

Not to mention that on the 15th we will know how much money Clinton actually owes. It may be another nail that blunts anything positive out of WV.

Ann Marie   May 10th, 2008 12:24 pm ET

It means I will not be visiting West Virginia any time in the near future. I think Hillary is a Republican. Maybe Hillary is trying to get back in the White House, so Chelsea can have a White House wedding.

G. Hill   May 10th, 2008 12:24 pm ET

I hope she wins by 100%. This Obama guy is a character!!! All talk and NO SUBSTANCE, Not to mention he is an elitist, a racist, a friend with a terrorist and a wife who does not give a hoot about the country unless he becomes president. I feel sorry for this country. This just proves that there are a lot of ignorant people in this country who do not know how to think anymore. They need someone to do it for them. This country would go to hell in a hand basket if he was elected…and let me tell you all something else….Think Hard about this because once you put him in office, it is virtually impossible to get him out!!!!!

mary   May 10th, 2008 12:24 pm ET

It means very little. This process is over. She can't possibly win this in any legitimate way. A big win in West Virginia is not unlike some late wins that Huckabee racked up. Doing well in a state like this doesn't change things. It seems everyone knows this is over but the Clintons. It's time for her to start paying off her debt, especially to the small vendors, dating back to the contest in Iowa.

Joyce in WV   May 10th, 2008 12:24 pm ET

Was this story really coming from Charlestown, WV or Charleston, WV, which is the state capital? Both are cities in WV, but at some distance apart. It is a common mistake made by folks who don't know much about the state.

Mark   May 10th, 2008 12:23 pm ET

Unfortunately the primary in West Virginia really means nothing at this juncture. The 50+ in conservitive blue collar votrer in rural america has had it's opportunity to keep in tact the direction of this country over 30 years ago and let it go. So why is their vote going to mean anything to a 30 year old American whose inherited this mess due to lack of responsibility and vision? Only if it's starts to vote with intellectuality instead of ideology, for the future Americans not the past they have given away. This election is about tommorrow not yesterday.

I am a 55 year old man whose ranks started in the Union Trade Labor Movement over 35 years ago. I was smart enough to leave and venture into the businees world and have done very well. I am also proud to be a fathered of a 1 year old boy. My vote is for his future.

OBAMA 08

Jeff   May 10th, 2008 12:23 pm ET

it won't send a "sobering message" to me. anything she wins in west virginia will be canceled out by oregon. it's over hillary. barack is kneeling down and running out the clock on this game.

carol mcfarlane   May 10th, 2008 12:23 pm ET

It doesn't say anything new – only confirms Hillary's taunts that she has the vote of the 'hardworking white blue collar Americans' – a stupid bait, if you ask me. It sends a message that her followers are not a part of the thinking, smart electorate! Of course she doesn't care how that reflects on her – the fact that she is in fact exploiting folk with sound bites, and dumbing down America. That she is in fact the leader we DO NOT need, one who would use demographics and doubting Thomases to get her ends.

Shame on her. The world is watching her tactics and Americans should wise up.

The polls will change over the weekend.

Regardless, the electorate changes after the primaries, so CNN, you should not be using scare tactics either!!! "…this should be sobering for the Democrats…" Please don't resort to sensationalism to improve your ratings.

kevin   May 10th, 2008 12:23 pm ET

Actually, I am sorry to say, I believe it says that WV appears to simply be bigoted…..

marc   May 10th, 2008 12:22 pm ET

I know religion can not be made an issue in politic in our country
but,I think it plays an important role in the selection as to who is
going to be the next president of America. I won't vote for Obama
because in his younger age he studied in Indonesia which is a
Muslim country. Remember Iran at the time of President Reagan
and latelty 9/11/01. In the Philippines Mindanao where some
americans were beheaded, because of hates, In my mind peace
and security comes first so that countries will prosper and i urge
each and every fellow Americans to vote H. Clinton the First WOMAN
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

Mike from WI   May 10th, 2008 12:21 pm ET

The benefit of having Clinton on the ticket for WV or KY would be far less than the trouble it would cause in bigger delegate states. I don't understand the argument that 'Republican-Lite' is going to satisfy those who prefer the real thing anyway. Best for Obama to play to his limited strengths in these states, and not worry so much about the inevitable losses, which probably will be less than Hillary's losses in western predominantly white states like Idaho.

Syqueen   May 10th, 2008 12:21 pm ET

West virginia will just mean that it's time for her to get ready to get out after june 3rd .Even if she win by 70% to 30% .She is gonna get 19 delegates to 9 for Obama.This is not helping her .That's why Obama didn't try to fight to close the gab.

David   May 10th, 2008 12:20 pm ET

I am from West Virginia and I know that Barack Obama is going to be the nominee and I am going to vote for him. However, I have been supporting Hillary Clinton this nominating season because I think she would be the best President. Let me make this clear RACE AND GENDER HAVE HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THE WAY I HAVE VOTED. So before all you high and mighty Obama supporters call me racist and look down upon a whole state remember racism is all over the country not just West Virginia. And while this state has its problems I love my home.

Ray   May 10th, 2008 12:20 pm ET

To the W VA voters…their ignorance and racism
To Hillary…A false hope
To Obama…nothing
To the rest of America…one step closer to the end

will   May 10th, 2008 12:20 pm ET

yawn. This is getting really tiring now. I'd really like to see the Democrats focus their attention on McCain now instead of all these silly irrelevant primaries. CNN – you need to stop dragging this, Obama is our nominee and everyone knows it.

BillieJean in Idaho   May 10th, 2008 12:19 pm ET

I just read the newsweek article,"Clinton says Obama can't win White Americans". Then we wonder why we have racial divides in this country.

West Virginia doesn't mean anything except they have that Hillary can fire up her campaign with the "race card". I guess if you are a Clinton and you are loosing you will do or say anything to save face.

ellianna   May 10th, 2008 12:19 pm ET

Barack Obama WILL win the DEMOCRATIC NOMINATION for President of the United States! West Virginia means nothing other than the fact that BILLARY will proclaim a BIG VICTORY — and continue to try to find some ugly, damaging, deceitful way, to spin the victory and march herself right to the Convention!! IT IS TRULY DISAPPOINTING AND DISHEARTENING TO SEE THAT THE MOST CORRUPT TWO INDIVIDUALS ON THIS EARTH ARE HILLARY AND BILL CLINTON!!! THEY TRULY CARE ONLY FOR THEMSELVES!! AND THEY KNOW FULL WELL THEY ARE TAKING DOWN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY EVERY MINUTE OF EVERY DAY CONTINUING ON IN THIS RACE THAT RIGHTFULLY IS BARACK OBAMA'S VICTORY!! As you said in the Ohio campaign, Hillary: SHAME ON YOU HILLARY CLINTON AND BILL CLINTON!! HOW DO YOU SPELL AMERICA?????

Mike   May 10th, 2008 12:19 pm ET

What is she fighting for? is she the democrat or an independent candidate? The democratic party goes by rules and because she is losing to Obama, she want to do everything to suit her. This party doesnt need people like her. It needs people like John Edwards to can accept defeat and quit. What is 28 delegates compared to over 100?
I need a break. Its time to get behind Obama and move the party forward. People have rejected the third term for Clintons in the White house. We need either Obama or McCain period.

kia   May 10th, 2008 12:19 pm ET

CNN Stop trying to make this about Race. It's over. Your loving Clinton has cross the Loosing Line.

pat   May 10th, 2008 12:19 pm ET

you have only 500,000 vote that obama is a head of hillary if she picks up 2 or 3 hundred thousand votes in w.v. then on to kentucky where you have 2 to 3 million voters she is leading in polls 66 to 29 an she picks up about i million votes shes back in the ball game for popular votes. go hillary you can do it.

Geriatic   May 10th, 2008 12:19 pm ET

PLEASE CNN, STOP TRYING TO PORTRAY DRAMA, WHERE THERE IS NO DRAMA. W. VIRGINIA WAS ALWAYS GONNA BE OVERWHELMINGLY FOR CLINTON. WITH 28 DELEGATES AT STAKE, AND BEING VERY GENEROUS TO HILLARY, I GIVE HER A 20-8 SPLIT FOR A GAIN OF 12, HARDLY A MAJOR MOMENTUM SHIFT.

matt   May 10th, 2008 12:19 pm ET

West Virginia is indeed a swing state. It's been a democratic state for a while until GW Bush won the state in 2000 and 2004. Losing West Virginia is going to be a big wake up call for Obama and his supporters. Question again is why can't Obama win the swing states? Instead, it shows Obama can only win the red republican states like North Carolina and Mississippi, states that the republicans are going to outnumber the democrats and win in the general election. HILLARY '08

Roger   May 10th, 2008 12:19 pm ET

Where has time yielded for you the people of West Virginia? Are you indeed better off then you were 16 years ago? Are you ready for many more years of the same? Sometimes pursueing a change can bring on the feeling of uncertainty and uneasiness. However, it is time to take that first step for a change for the better. Please vote for Barack Obama, West Virginia. This is for the future fo your children and grandchildren.

mya, Obama   May 10th, 2008 12:19 pm ET

West Virginia means it's time to 'suck-up' to Clinton's supporters: She's a wonderful candidate, America is a great country for having dedicated civil servants like Bill and Hillary Clinton, having said that, it's now time to hand it over to a new generation. Allow me to introduce PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA!!!!!!

Relevant   May 10th, 2008 12:19 pm ET

"Some say" is a "weasel words" phrase, and any first-year journalist knows this.

You can not report something as "news" while saying "some say"… cite your sources, or, admit that you just expressed an opinion as fact, and renounce yourself as a true news establishment.

CNN is the Clinton News Network… this has never been more clear. Report the facts; do not report your pipe dream wishes about your chosen candidate in the form of a "news item".

The truth from my perspective as an Obama supporter is that the WV outcome will not send me a message of -any- kind. I don't care about the results of a primary that was a foregone conclusion.

CNN please stop showing your tremendous bias, and quit trying to drum up interesting dramatic headlines where there are none! If you want to keep luring your readership back, do it on the basis of real journalism, not tabloid-like sensationalism. The damage you've already done to the election by this is incalculable.

Mary - Independent   May 10th, 2008 12:18 pm ET

I believe that Hillary Clinton will do what she thinks is right. If she gains votes in the remaining states over Obama, then there might be a change of who would be the Democratic nominee. Those people who are pushing to get Obama in the White house should not tell her to quit. That is not democratic and Americans have the right to have their votes counted.

Steve   May 10th, 2008 12:18 pm ET

OK. Remind me. Who is Clinton again? Oh, yeah, the powerful candidate Democratic Party maven who lost her lofty position to a young upstart, right?

It's over. Clinton is so far behind, and disappearing in the rear view mirror of the Obama campaign bus, that this primary means nothing. She is beyond bankrupt fiscally and socially.

It means nothing. Less than nothing.

having their say   May 10th, 2008 12:18 pm ET

it maens that they get to vote.

Patrick from Hazard, Kentucky   May 10th, 2008 12:18 pm ET

This is really no surprise for me, its the same way here in Kentucky. I am a huge Obama supporter and when I listen to people talk politics, they ALL say one of the same 4 things.
"I ain't votin for no Muslim."
"He won't say the Pledge!"
"He and his Pastor are racist!"
"I think he is the Anti-Christ!"

No matter how hard I fight or how much proof I show them that these things are false, they refuse to believe me.

Art Vanderleigh   May 10th, 2008 12:18 pm ET

Hillary is staying in the race because "she knows something"—
Obamaniacs beware!

god bless america   May 10th, 2008 12:18 pm ET

Clinton does not get support from "older population", she got support from "mature population". Obama had caught my eyes four years ago, however, his reputation does not sustain with time. Look closely, you can find the twinkles in Bush's eyes in Obama. Obama got a free ride from the press which stirred up a fashion trend in younger generation. But, will it last?

kris   May 10th, 2008 12:18 pm ET

west virginia's primary means that HILLARY is still going strong. she barely had time to enjoy her win in indiana (my home state) before people were calling for her to quit the race. really?! SHE'S STILL WINNING STATES, and by all accounts, will win w.v. BIG TIME.

she deserves the nomination at the most, and at the least, a v.p. spot.

Mr Plum   May 10th, 2008 12:18 pm ET

It means that this nation still struggles to overcome the racial divide. Have you ever wondered why the more racially diversified states are "blue" while the other states are "red"? It's not simply liberals against conservatives.

count the votes   May 10th, 2008 12:17 pm ET

It means that the people should have been allowed to vote and their votes should have counted.

Why should Obama be our nominee just because the same old tired washington insiders make the decision for us?

Aren't you tired of it too?   May 10th, 2008 12:17 pm ET

Nothing.

RICK   May 10th, 2008 12:17 pm ET

NO, WEST VIRGINIA WILL HAVE NO BEARING ON THE OUTCOME OF THIS RACE. LET'S ALSO BE VERY HONEST, THIS IS ALSO A VERY RACIST STATE WITH A VERY LARGE "RED NECK" POPULATION WHICH HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH "BLUE COLLAR" WORKERS.

alex   May 10th, 2008 12:16 pm ET

who cares about her big win still obama

Shannon   May 10th, 2008 12:16 pm ET

It shows that a large group of democrats want HIllary Clinton to be our president, and that the campaign of hope and change doesn't have a chance in the general election. The Obama campaign has run the most negative campaign ever, with the help of the media. Hillary Clinton, one of the greatest champions of children's rights, women's rights and the rights of African Americans didn't suddenly become a racist hate monger. That is how the Obama campaign, the media, and most of all his supporters portrayed her. There are millions of democrats who will not vote for Obama because of this horrible destruction of one democrat by another democrat. His actions never matched his words, and people like Jack Cafferty and Roland Martin on CNN were on everyday destroying the character of Hillary Clinton. Anderson Cooper the other night even mocked a Hillary supporter on the air, I guess CNN has given up on journalism. Just read the posts here by Obama supporters, have you ever read such hate. It's going to be my goal between now and the general to show as many people as I can the pages and pages of posts here on CNN that I have printed out. These posts show people how hate filled the Obama campaign is, how racist it is, and how his supporters seem to endorse violence and hate to get him elected. Good luck Obama in the general, you're going to need it, this lifelong democrat will never vote for you, and I know many more who won't. I say bravo to the people of WV, and be prepared to be attacked, I have already read here how racist and ignorant the people of WV are. It's just typical Obama rhetoric, all part of the campaign of hope and change.

voters only   May 10th, 2008 12:16 pm ET

It means the DNC messed up by fixing this primary for Obama.

It means Obama screwed up by exploiting the race card too many times.

It meand that the people should have made this decision. Hard to do when their votes are disenfranchised and when the votes from the flawed, undemocratic caucus format count as much as the votes from primaries.

It means Democrats will lose in Nov. And it will teach the DNC, and the WASHINGTON INSIDER ELITES THAT BROKE WASHIGTON, a much needed lesson.

Drew, Central FL   May 10th, 2008 12:16 pm ET

"Some say it could send a sobering message to Obama's Democratic supporters."

That small minority is talking about a state that comprises roughly half a percent of the country's population. Obama will still have an INSURMOUNTABLE lead.

This is just getting painful to watch. She's already lost. She's just running out the clock. It's saddening.

It's time to stop this travesty and get behind Obama and mend tensions. Democrats have to get ready for the real fight in Nov. The real opponents are McCain and the GOP.

Dems UNITE ! ! !

BillieJean in Idaho   May 10th, 2008 12:16 pm ET

The media injects race into all of its polls so let's be honest about it.

My daughter in law is from West Virginia and she says there is no way they will vote for an african american man before Hillary. She believes the true democrats will vote for him in the general over McCain, but in the primary they are going to make their first choice Hillary due to the age and makeup of the state.

Luckily, there are not very many states like Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Kentucky and Tennessee that are left in the US or we would never get past the racial issues in this country.

tom   May 10th, 2008 12:15 pm ET

Its funny how WV is a small state, and a red state, yet Clinton now insists that it actually does count!

Tammy   May 10th, 2008 12:15 pm ET

It means nothing. He know that going into the primary for that state. People need to stop thinking that putting Clinton on Obama's ticket as VP is a good thing. With all of Clinton's negatives it will divide the party more and the people voting for Obama (such as myself), will end up not voting or not voting Democratic.

Dick in Sioux Falls   May 10th, 2008 12:15 pm ET

All Obama needs to do in West Virginia is to point out that only he (and Sen Orrin Hatch) advocate removing the Social Security
Tax cap which would guarantee Social Security forever! Hillary has resisted the idea because she and Bill have too many rich friends.
Only he has set forth a plan to give $1,000 Tax cut to lower and middle income America.
Only he has resisted NAFTA, and not campaigned for it vigorously from its inception, as Hillary has done.
It is ridiculous to suggest as Hillary maintains, that she has been an enthusiastic champion of middle income America.
It is Obama who worked as a community organizer in Chicago, helping lower and middle income Americans to pull themselves up out of poverty, and received national recognition for it. Hillary has nothing like that in her resume.
And being brought up in Lake Forest, Illinois, is not being a part of middle income America.

Don   May 10th, 2008 12:14 pm ET

CNN Plz post my Comment.
Hope U'll say the same when it comes to South Dakota, Montana and Oregon.

Kevin   May 10th, 2008 12:14 pm ET

Finally a state that isn't stupid and can see through Obama's false hopes. Connections to terrorists, racism, wealth distribution, the list goes on and on. I've had enough of Obama. "Change we can believe in," yeah right. You've got to be an idiot to believe that.

Vahe   May 10th, 2008 12:14 pm ET

That's a shame for CNN to have such an idiot Political Analyst as Bill Schneider

Realistic   May 10th, 2008 12:14 pm ET

It will mean about the same thing as a three-point basketball goal by a team down 22 points with 9 second remaining. Yes, it is exciting and will cheer up the fans of the underdog, but in the big scheme of things it will be totally, utterly meaningless since this primary race is effectively over.

You may switch channels to a competitive game now …..

BTW, let us never forget:

(1) Hillary voted for the war, and

(2) Hillary agreed that Michigan and Florida should not be counted.

Go Hillary   May 10th, 2008 12:14 pm ET

1 down, 5 to go.

I mean it… Hillary, please GO!!

al   May 10th, 2008 12:13 pm ET

AH so now we know that Hillary is in "Hill Billy Country" now and should get a BIG WIN. Thats funny. So this is where the HARD WORKING white people live and they will not vote for Obama.

I wonder if the folks of West Virginia will allow themselves to be BRANDED as RACIST and this is what the Clintons have pushed and are about to use the people of the state to PROVE a point that "race does matter" and West Viginians are living proof of it.

Obama 08
YES WE CAN – YES WE WILL

Jamey Columbus   May 10th, 2008 12:13 pm ET

In the words of demographics… WV may not matter.. its a mccain state…….

Doug from Cali   May 10th, 2008 12:13 pm ET

Don't follow the logic, the GOP in W.VA will paint Obama as a pro-gay, pro-choice far left liberal and they won't to Hillary…or it won't work? They have voted the same about 95% of the time. This is an idiotic take and goes to show the vapidness of talking heads like Schneider. Like Obama's going to ask Hillary to be VP in order to win W.VA. What a schmuck.

sally   May 10th, 2008 12:13 pm ET

Hillary has really gone more right wing than the Repubs – her true Goldwater roots are showing, she only went Dem for Bill, as they say
.

Is this article implying she is anti-gay, anti-civil union, anti-womens right to choose? Thanks for being such a great womens candidate. God help us if the Dems think this stance is going to win the general election. West Virginia is not even important in the electoral college.

Why are we so bent on having the least educated deciding the most important office in the world? Cnn what is she promising you?

Concerned American   May 10th, 2008 12:13 pm ET

She needs to quit and I am sick of CNN announcing these insignificant "closing the gap" updates. Let's hear more about Obama's significant gains.

Washinton Insiders for Obama   May 10th, 2008 12:12 pm ET

Wow… superdelegates will decide who the nominee is.

So the old Washington insiders who broke washington will now HAVE to give the nomination to Obama. To pander to the threats of youth who never bothered to vote before and to appease African Americans.

This is NEW politics? Sounds like the same old crap to me.

Obama should be denouncing the support of the superdelegates. After all they broke washington and are all washington insiders.

Instead he will be the nominee ONLY if they vote for him.

How sadly ironic that all is.

GrannyRyan53   May 10th, 2008 12:12 pm ET

This means nothing because the race is over! Hillary is behind by every objective standard! She can't catch up! She can't win! She will likely continue to bash the Democratic nominee because she is a "sore loser."

CNN please post this!

JM   May 10th, 2008 12:12 pm ET

I've been trying to find a blog to leave this comment on. So far this is the only one i've found and my comment does't go with the subject.

Anyway, I've been hearing about Obama finding a V. President they keep saying Hillary.
Well, what if he asked another African American man to be his V.P. Someone like COLEEN POWELL.
To me that would be the best ticket ever offered in any Presidental Election.

Mary L.   May 10th, 2008 12:11 pm ET

Wow, the voters are getting it. Senator Obama is nothing more than a talking, walking machine. All air and no subsatance. Believe he has bribed the superdelegates with $$s for their next campaign or promised favors. Does the people want all of America to look like his South Chicago area with is proverty and crime. And lets not forget, the very corrupt Chicago political maachine that has helped him so far, Rezko, Ayers, Rev. Wright, the Black Liberation Theology Church and its hateful teaching that the BLACKS ARE THE CHOSEN PEOPLE. Wake up, voters, this man is not the leader we need or want. Vote for anyone except Obama. Even his wife hates America.

Bob from Virginia   May 10th, 2008 12:11 pm ET

"Some say it could send a sobering message to Obama's Democratic supporters" Some Hillary supporters you meant to say. They are the only ones that think a big win here means anything.

Christopher   May 10th, 2008 12:11 pm ET

What West Virginia means is simple: America still has a long way to go to rid itself of racial prejudice. It's that simple.

erica   May 10th, 2008 12:10 pm ET

Since I can see the barrage of racist claims coming from Obama-bots:

For the last time, if someone doesn't vote for Obama, it does not mean they are racist!!!

Hillary supporters don't cry sexist at everyone who doesn't vote for her.

Get over yourselves!!! Substance, people.

Drew, Central FL   May 10th, 2008 12:10 pm ET

"Some say it could send a sobering message to Obama's Democratic supporters."

That small minority is talking about a state that comprises roughly half a percent of the country's population. Obama will still have an INSURMOUNTABLE

Hamilton, Kansas City   May 10th, 2008 12:10 pm ET

(what happened to my comment?)

It will show that even with all of the lies, double-talk, smearing, and pandering that there are still many racists in this country who would vote for Hilary over Barack Obama.

skyjuice   May 10th, 2008 12:10 pm ET

The numbers will change slightly towards Barack before tuesday's primary but she'll still lead by at least 15 points. Kentucky he will do slightly better. Puerto Rico is Clinton's land but after that, it's all his with SD,OR and MT.

OBAMA 08′/12′

MichaelMichigan   May 10th, 2008 12:10 pm ET

It's pretty interesting that Obama supporters are such bigots toward the people of West Virginia. I thought he and his supporters were for change, warm fuzzies, and hugs? Not if you happen to be from West Viriginia. This Clinton supporter will be voting for McCain in the fall. He and his supporters disgust me.

Die Hard Obama Supporter   May 10th, 2008 12:10 pm ET

It does not mean anything. It is time to land this plane Hillary. Try and avoid sniper fires as you land!

Luis   May 10th, 2008 12:10 pm ET

Well, at this point it will mean a lot to her exit strategy but nothing to overall race… how many delegates are at stake? She might win big but it won't change the status of the race. She needs to retire very soon, otherwise the democratic party will have to thank the Clinton's for a big win for McCain in November.

Dems2008   May 10th, 2008 12:09 pm ET

It also means, 1 down and 5 to go until we can really get this long awaited pre season over.

Everyone will eventually realize we are just one country and we all have the same basic values.

We need a big coalition–not just rural white people. We are not as resitant to change as some would have us be.

Mark Ferbet, Grain Valley Missouri   May 10th, 2008 12:09 pm ET

Hillary Clinton has been sounding more like a member of the Republican Party over the past weeks… and I am beginning to believe that only those that want to continue the policies of W. will support her. Those Democrats that don't represent the party, but tend to vote Republican, or on hot bed Republican issues, Gun Control, Abortion, Gay Marriage, Etc.. Etc… Many Republicans are disinfranchised with their own Candidate.. and they will vote for the next best… Clinton… another truly Savvy, Old School Politician, just like McCain.

The states that vote for Clinton represent more of the same… those that vote for Obama… want change… significan change in Washington D.C.

These folks will likely not even research Obama.. but will only vote against him because they think he's a Neo Liberal… which he is not.

David Thinks!   May 10th, 2008 12:09 pm ET

The next few contest will prove that Hillary is the "correct" nominee to represent the "broader" base of the party. Obama is so far in his Oprah-Winfrey Ivory Tower that you've got to wonder if he will give away free cars when he becomes President-and no one will be able to afford the gas for them. Hillary is experienced on the issues that matter to 'average' Americans and knows how to deliver to fix many of the problems facing "the people". Obama and his supporters seem to be on some cheerleading team about "changing" history – but that doesn't put food on the table, secure your job, create new jobs, create healthcare for all etc. Hillary's ideas hit the soul of what the problems and solutions are for the next President while Obama just keeps yapping and droning on like he's trying to win a toast-master's trophy. Go Hillary go..despite the pundits with an agenda.

Being frank   May 10th, 2008 12:09 pm ET

If PENSYLVANIA , the big state couldn`t help her? Is it WEST VIRGINIA, the small state that will help her.
THIS GAME IS JUST OVER FOR THE CLINTONS,PERIOD. SHE NEEDS TO FACE THE FACTS!!

drew   May 10th, 2008 12:08 pm ET

Senator Obama has some work to do in West Virginia, certainly. But it is a small state that has not been vital to Democratic success. What is refreshing is that Obama is still campaigning there, fulfilling his commitment to serve as President of a United States of America.

for obama nj   May 10th, 2008 12:08 pm ET

it really doesn't mean anything, i cannot understand why people will waste their vote on hillary……and as far as the white votes, the chosen vice president will draw those voters….but there are many, many whites in obama's corner…..hillary is not all that!!!

Pete   May 10th, 2008 12:08 pm ET

Its means they are just as backwards as theyve ever been. You can't say that WV is an important swing state and then disenfranchise all the others that obama has won.

Jean   May 10th, 2008 12:08 pm ET

Go Home Hillsilly!!!!!

Chris - WI   May 10th, 2008 12:08 pm ET

HILLARY WILL WIN WEST VIRGINIA & KENTUCKY…. THEN WHAT WILL OBAMA DO AFTER TWO IMPORTANT STATES ARE LOST?? I KNOW WHO WOULD NEVER WIN THESE TWO IN THE GENERAL!

MP-Pennsylvania   May 10th, 2008 12:08 pm ET

This was news yesterday. Why CNN has same thing over and over when it is about Hillary.
Only thing Obama got was Wright.

Clinton Net Work

liar Obama   May 10th, 2008 12:08 pm ET

The people are not deciding the nominee. The Washington Insiders will vote and decide for us.

Obama the man of change… who speaks of a broken washington… and of the old washington insiders who broke it- must NOW ask those old washington insiders to GIVE him the democratic nomination.

Ted Kennedy and the superdelegates are nothing but old washington insiders. Now they will vote and select the party nominee- NOT the people.

Obama should be shunning and denouncing them- instead he is courting them. What a hypocritical liar.

very smart lady   May 10th, 2008 12:07 pm ET

Good for West Virginia. Somebody better wake up and smell the coffee. Obama will be the worst thing possible for America at this time. Maybe a great win for Senator Clinton will at least wipe the smirk off Obama's face. He and Michelle have too much baggage to be president. He hasn't a clue how to lead. I am afraid of the terrible genes he has, also. You know, they say blood tells, and so does genes. If Senator Clinton loses, I will vote for Senator McCain.

wakethehellup!!!!!   May 10th, 2008 12:07 pm ET

This mean don't cound Hillary our and the SD's need to wake up!

isn't it ironic   May 10th, 2008 12:07 pm ET

Obama the man of change… who speaks of a broken washington… and of the old washington insiders who broke it- must NOW ask those old washington insiders to GIVE him the democratic nomination.

Ted Kennedy and the superdelegates are nothing but old washington insiders. Now they will vote and select the party nominee- NOT the people.

Obama should be shunning and denouncing them- instead he is courting them. What a hypocritical liar.

Kelvin   May 10th, 2008 12:07 pm ET

It will mean absolutely nothing, just delaying the inevitable.

Obama 08′

Chas   May 10th, 2008 12:06 pm ET

The results from West Virginia will be irrelevant. Obama has already locked up the nomination, and we already know that he doesn't do well among supporters of Sen. Clinton. But Obama could put other states in play (e.g. Colorado) that normally vote Republican, and he's also attracted many new voters. He may not win the election, but I think it's time that Democrats tried a different strategy and gave up trying to out-Republican the Republicans.

Hamilton, Kansas City   May 10th, 2008 12:06 pm ET

It will show that even with all of the lies, double-talk, smearing, and pandering that there are still many racists in this country who would vote for Hilary over Barack Obama.

Hal   May 10th, 2008 12:06 pm ET

It is my sincere hope that the people of W. Virginia do not live up to the stereotypes of them put forth by the media but I would not be surprised if in a two person race between a OMG "black" man and a white lady that the results are out of line with the rest of the civilized world.

The oldest, whitest and most poorly educated state in the Union. Hmmmmmmmm I wonder why Hillary will win there. It is not like they will vote for the Dems in the general election anyway. So this is hardly a bell-weather state for the DNC to be looking at.

Bobby tray   May 10th, 2008 12:06 pm ET

It doesn't say a thing as it was expected. . . Only the media is going to make a big deal about it. Talk about creating news.

Amy   May 10th, 2008 12:06 pm ET

Hillary has shown more interest in West Virginia than Obama. She has been making stops in this state since last summer. I have yet to see Obama come to WV.

Marty   May 10th, 2008 12:06 pm ET

It means nothing in the grand scheme of things. Obama is the nominee. I know CNN favors Hillary, but it's time for you – and especially Hillary shill Wolf Blitzer – to let her go.

Obama 08

BV   May 10th, 2008 12:05 pm ET

West Virginia? 28 Delegates? Demographics that overwhelmingly favor Clinton?
Wow, what significance. If WV is such a big deal, why wasn't Mississippi a big deal?
Mississippi has slightly more delegates and demographics that HEAVILY favored Obama. Nobody questioned Hillary's ability to 'win the black vote' in the general election after Mississippi. Double standard much?
Quit trying to add significance to any remaining state primaries. The math hasn't changed since March. I know you media types are aching for this endless Christmas present to keep on giving, but its just getting silly.
OBAMA is the Nominee. Sorry, true story.

Mich   May 10th, 2008 12:05 pm ET

Nothing.

Its all decided now that RACE played a big role, and Obama was beneficiary of it.

He is winning superdelegates from all over the muslim world, his distant cousins. Dems aer hell bound seeing Rezko and Wright in White Hosue dining with OhBama.

Its the Math stupid!   May 10th, 2008 12:05 pm ET

Lets see….
NC Obama 65 /Clinton 50
IN Obama34 / Clinton 38
Total from Primaries Obama 99 / Clinton 88
Say she gets 75% popular vote in beautiful WV
WV Obama7 / Clinton 21

Here's the REAL message

Today Obama 1861 / Clinton 1698, currently at a 163 deficit with only 217 delegates to go, which will always be split….something to think about while discussing messages

JerzyMD   May 10th, 2008 12:05 pm ET

It means she won West Virginia. Its amazing how we come up with so many spins and twists to something that is very simple, whoever has the most votes wins. It doesn't matter who has the most votes in the third quarter because at the end of the game whoever has the most points wins. END OF STORY.

Fred   May 10th, 2008 12:05 pm ET

Oregon will make up the differance for Obama. We have been right on picking the Presedent. And believe me we didnt vote for Bush. 1st or 2nd term. What a bad pick that was . Any body that voted for him should blame them selfs for the way this country has gone.

LINDA,FL   May 10th, 2008 12:05 pm ET

It does not mean more , than MS and WA for example.
Please, add those to Your picture to make it complete.

CNN, It is not a fair in this article.
And that makes people upset.

Alex in MA   May 10th, 2008 12:05 pm ET

What might WV primary mean?

NOTHING. ABSOLUTELY NOTHING! IT'S OVER HILLARY. LET'S MOVE ON!

walrusk1   May 10th, 2008 12:05 pm ET

Who cares? This race is done.

DELMARVA   May 10th, 2008 12:05 pm ET

Hillary could win 200% of the vote in West Virginia's primary and she still wouldn't win the nomination.

David, Paducah, Kentucky   May 10th, 2008 12:04 pm ET

A win in West Virginia, regardless of the margin means absolutely nothing. The overall spread is too great and its too late in the primary season. The States demographics are custom made for her, just like some of the other States were custom made for Obama. The primaries in all of those States refelcted that.

Dems2008   May 10th, 2008 12:04 pm ET

Not much… WV will probably go to the republicans if thy don't get concrete solutions to their poblems. They don't need to be pandered to or scared into thinking Clinton is the ONLY answer to their problems.

Dinah   May 10th, 2008 12:04 pm ET

Its a tragic end to the Clintons..
They're trying to end this in a higher note by winning big.
So,a 46-year-old, 1st term Black senator could topple the clinton dynasty…
Do we need any more proof
about his ability to make WORLD a better place for all??

Kirk   May 10th, 2008 12:04 pm ET

Can Obama Handle The Stress ?

Obama 57 state strategy:
Whoops, Obama in Oregon today:

It is wonderful to be back in Oregon," Obama said. "Over the last 15 months, we"ve traveled to every corner of the United States. I"ve now been in 57 states? I think one left to go. Alaska and Hawaii, I was not allowed to go to even though I really wanted to visit, but my staff would not justify it."

The Times' conscientious Robin Abcarian thought she heard something different there. She checked her tape recorder. It had captured what he had actually said — 57 states now.

He even paused before he said "57″ as if he was thinking about the number

Wow this is funnier than any Bush fowl-ups

Hillary 2008 , Ready To Lead On Day One

super irony   May 10th, 2008 12:04 pm ET

It means that Obama can not seal the deal with the people so the superdelegates must decide who the democratic party nominee is.

The superdelegates are the old Washington Insiders that Obama rants against. They are responsible for the broken Washington.

Ironically Obama must now appeal to the old Washington insiders who broke Washinton, in order to secure himself the nomination.

How sad for the candidate of change.

Brian from Iowa   May 10th, 2008 12:04 pm ET

A friend of mine — an Obama supporter, nonetheless — told me in the kitchen we work in last night that the "…[fanatical] supporters are beginning to show themselves for the general election."

Indeed. Post-partisan politics, I think not.

Let the PEOPLE have their votes counted: do NOT force a viable candidate from the race until every voice has been heard!!!

Kevin M   May 10th, 2008 12:03 pm ET

WV & KY will offer Hillary an opportunity to exit on a high note. Hillary and the media will magnify the significance of 4 ECV in the fall to overwhelming significance. Hillary will have a week to argue that she is more electable. Obama will likely have a majority of the pledged delegates after Oregon and will continue to campaign against McCain until the superdelegates put him over the top by June 6th at the latest.

Jim Nammack; Kentucky   May 10th, 2008 12:03 pm ET

Why is it that Sen. Clinton is the only one that needs to do the math? The way things are going now, she will not have the 2025 delegte votes needed to win her party's nomination on the first ballot. But, the way things are going now, neither will Sen. Obama have the 2025 delegate votes needed to win his party's nomination on the first ballot. So why doesn't CNN and the rest of the media hop all over Obama and ask why is he still running, what is his exit strategy, why can't he do the math, and so forth and so on?

CNN seems to think that it is a case of the candidate with the most votes winning the Democratic nomination. Totally wrong. It is a case of the candidate with 2025 delegate votes winning the Democratic nomination. That will not happen on the first vote taken at the convention. After that first vote, in which neither candidate wins, the pledged delegates become unpledged and can vote for whomever they please. And they will. It will become a free-for-all. With her expected big wins in West Virginia and Kentucky, Clinton will have a good chance at winning more total votes among the general public than Obama, and she will try to use that to sway delegates to vote for her on the 2nd and 3rd ballots. If, after a few convention votes take place and neither candidate has gone over the top with the required 2025 delegate votes, the delegates will start considering compromise canditates, such as Al Gore.

Don't expect to learn any of this by watching CNN.

Joss   May 10th, 2008 12:03 pm ET

Even if she wins 100% it still won't help her towards becoming the nominee. If she cares about the future of the democratic party and of Obama's chances at becoming the next president over McCain then she needs to drop out before West Virginia.

You lost Hillary. Sorry – face it.

Haneefah   May 10th, 2008 12:03 pm ET

This is just what most people are talking about, Senator Clinton is really playing the race card and a lot of white people are falling for it also. She is really telling White people to show their racism and let the world know that they will not tolerate any other race in the White House but White people. Senator Clinton said it herself that the only hard working people are White people and White Blue Collar workers. She did not say that their are Black, Latino, Asian, African, etc. Blue Collar workers. I am an African American woman, I teach and I am insulted that she feels that white people are the only people that work.

Haneefah
Stone Mountain, GA

PJ Boise ID   May 10th, 2008 12:02 pm ET

It will mean with Hillary's help, Obama will be the next president (not as a vp though). If Hillary keeps attacking him she can run against McCain in 2012.

Ken   May 10th, 2008 12:02 pm ET

Obama can not and will not win in November.I have been a registered Democrat for over 20 years.I have always voted for a Democrat.But what I am seeing now,with in the Democratic Party sickens me,I will register as an independent.
Go Hillary,fight the good fight.

Demian   May 10th, 2008 12:02 pm ET

God help us , if Obama puts Clinton on the ticket. With a Clinton in the White House, it would be an inside plotters heaven. Also,

Maybe W. Virginia will surprise all of us by keeping the expected Clinton victory to a smaller margin.

Michael in MO   May 10th, 2008 12:02 pm ET

Media mavens have decided that Barack must be the nominee – not the voters. Unfortunately, we are a 30″ sound bite/video clip culture, and tend less to think/research the truth. It is long overdue for all of us to finally stop playing the American Idol game and acknowledge the hypocracy of Obama. He is an empty suit – a proven racist, and a pathological liar. He does not offer this country leadership in any tangible sense – he offers words. He offers hope. We don't have time to "hope" for "change." For someone who touts not being a part of the Washington system, his "change" platform is one of the oldest politcal dog-n-pony shows known.

Both Senator Clinton and Obama represent a unique opportunity via race or gender. The difference lies in experience and tenacity, which Senator Clinton offers in volumes. If Obama were white, older, and lacked the orator skills he has, he would have gone the way of Dennis Kusinich months ago, as he is no different – admirable for change, but not leadership material. This man has no vested interests in the needs of Americans and the betterment of our country, domestically and internationally. He is in this for one thing only – Obama. For the country's sake, please get real and vote for Hillary. Research the facts and positions – educate yourselves. Without question, you will find Hillary to be the obvious choice for president.

Glenn, Cary, NC   May 10th, 2008 12:02 pm ET

So now the Obamabots will say:

1) Insulting things about West Virginia and West Virginians
2) Insulting things about supporters of Senator Clinton
3) That Senator Clinton and her supporters and West Virginians are racists because they are white
4) That it doesn't matter because Senator Clinton has long been favored in West Virginia (never mind that Senator Obama was always favored in NC, that one counts because he only lost half of his early lead)
5) That it doesn't matter because Senator Obama has already won (not true)
6) That it doesn't matter because Senator Obama is going to win anyway (could be, you never know, have you kids ever heard of a man named Thomas Eagleton?)
7) That CNN is biased because they occasionally say something about Senator Clinton that isn't nasty

Just thought I would save you all the trouble of reading all the other comments.

Robert   May 10th, 2008 12:01 pm ET

Go Hillary..Show em that this race is NOT over!

Paul   May 10th, 2008 12:01 pm ET

Tell us something we dont know…!!

It wont make any difference! Even Obama has admmited that
he doesnt have a chance in WV..

He is too far ahead, Clinton is as good as gone!

Josh   May 10th, 2008 12:01 pm ET

What might West Virginia's primary mean?

Nothing.

nyangena   May 10th, 2008 12:01 pm ET

There is a demographic group that will not vote for hilary or Obama in any election (ferminist vs racist).but lets face it out of the two, Obama attracts a larger constituency .

Steve   May 10th, 2008 12:01 pm ET

who cares? it's over. she is doing more harm to the dems than anything at this point.

Mary   May 10th, 2008 12:01 pm ET

West Virginia is holding firm because has made this a race war. It is a shameful way to get votes in difficult times like these. He 'new-base' is listening to her and so is the media.

right to vote.   May 10th, 2008 12:01 pm ET

It means EVERYone- even poor white people have the right to vote for the candidate of their choice, without being branded racists.

It means that the racial divide Obama created to fuel his rise will work against him in Nov.

He chose to divide by race.

OBAMA CANNOT WIN IN NOVEMBER!!!   May 10th, 2008 12:01 pm ET

IT MEANS OBAMA CANNOT WIN THE LARGE STATES NEEDED FOR THE GENERAL!

WE WILL BE GETTING McCAIN!

HILLARY IS OUR ONLY SAVING GRACE!

IF SHE IS DENIED WE ARE DOOMED!!!!!!

Lucy   May 10th, 2008 12:00 pm ET

Hillary would be getting even higher numbers if Republican women were allowed to vote for her in this state.

Dems2008   May 10th, 2008 12:00 pm ET

I doesn't show anything.

Once Clinton leaves the race, we will all coalese behind our democratic candidate. Obama could't have lead the way without a big portion of the white vote and we all know the differences between Clinton and Obama were minute–it explodes when you compare McCain and Obama.

Once women realize that McCain will do his best to overthrow Rowe v. Wade, replacing retiring judges with overly conservative one and expanding tax breks for the wealthy (do you like crumbs)?

This race was exciting to say the least– but its now a done deal!

A Sobering Message?   May 10th, 2008 12:00 pm ET

Right now Obama is ahead by 164 delegates. Even if West Virginia reduced the gap by 14, Obama would still be ahead by 150. How could that send "a sobering message" to Obama? Ridiculous.

B, USA   May 10th, 2008 12:00 pm ET

NOTHING !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

After all according to HRC small states don't matter

We have a NOMINEE already

Just another trick up their sleeves to say HRC won by large margin. It's over and better luck next time.

Kirk   May 10th, 2008 12:00 pm ET

It Means Obama Can Not Win The White Lunch Bucket Folk !!! He Can't handle The pressure , Look At What Obama said

Obama 57 state strategy:
Whoops, Obama in Oregon today:

It is wonderful to be back in Oregon," Obama said. "Over the last 15 months, we"ve traveled to every corner of the United States. I"ve now been in 57 states? I think one left to go. Alaska and Hawaii, I was not allowed to go to even though I really wanted to visit, but my staff would not justify it."

The Times' conscientious Robin Abcarian thought she heard something different there. She checked her tape recorder. It had captured what he had actually said — 57 states now.

He even paused before he said "57″ as if he was thinking about the number

Wow this is funnier than any Bush fowl-ups

Hillary 08 ,

CNN is a Joke   May 10th, 2008 12:00 pm ET

Wait… so after Tuesday's primary you couldn't WAIT to pronounce the race over and call the remaining contests meaningless, but now West Virginia – a state there has NEVER been any question would go to Hillary decisively – could send a "sobering statement" to the Democratic party.

You idiots never cease to amaze me. What happened to "journalism"? It's all sensationalism. You're as bad as Fox "News".

GO OBAMA!

Juan Carlos(Vegas)   May 10th, 2008 11:59 am ET

It means that even some Democrats will not ever vote for Obama, so He is going to lose on November. (I meant the corrupt media is going to lose on November)

Bitter Surburban voter   May 10th, 2008 11:59 am ET

It shows Obama's race will be a factor in the general election.

linda-Texas   May 10th, 2008 11:59 am ET

Senator Obama's in not an accurate representation of the majority of voters in this primary election. With the voters of two state being disenfranchised by the DNC and the questionable results of the caucuses, the primary election is a complete farce.

The true majority will have their votes counted in the general election. Senator Obama may win the nomination but I would not put any money on him winning the general election.

Karen   May 10th, 2008 11:59 am ET

Clinton is showing her true color: if not the party nominee, then the VP; if not the VP, then split the party; if cannot spilt the party, then damage Obama for her ambition in 2012.

I'm sure Limbaugh and Hannity are appluding her effort; she is their gun.
That is why Obama is fighting on both fronts. In fact, fighting this ego-driven Clintonism is more challenging then fighting McCain. If you still do not realize it, then face it now: this primary is the main battle field in this election year, simply because political cancer emboddied by Clintion is too pervasive and too deep in our system.

Wake up, Clinton voters. Given the high turnout this primary season, I do not see how McCain can win even if half of you vote for him. You can stick to Clinton and lose, or vote for Obama and win the election. It is your own choice.

started   May 10th, 2008 11:58 am ET

Obama started a really hateful, bad divide when he played the race card to secure the black vote. He was exploiting race for his own advancement. Now it is backfiring on him.

It was wrong to call the Clintons racists.

We all know that they are not.

So now he is the one responsible for the lack of unity in the party.

It will not unite in Nov.

Marc - don't be fooled WV   May 10th, 2008 11:58 am ET

Hillary and Bill are multi-millionaires. Hillary does a good job of making you all believe she is there for you when in fact she is only there for herself and her huge EGO.

Just ask upstate New Yorkers IF Hillary kept her many promises to them. The answer is NO. Vote for hope and a new change of direction and philosophy in Washington. Vote Obama and get this thing over with.

Steve   May 10th, 2008 11:58 am ET

It will show that Hillary's poorly-worded statement about her "base" is correct. She is very popular among poorly-educated, blue collar workers. They will vote overwhelmingly for her, mainly because they actually think she's a blue collar gal, based upon what she's told them. Anyone who wears blaze orange "deer hunter" pantsuits MUST be blue collar, right???

Unfortunately for her, (and fortunately for the rest of the US) this particular segment of the population isn't very big. If it was, she'd be in the lead, now. Thought the Clinton machine, as broken and creaky as it is right now, will try to make a very big deal of this win, it really doesn't mean anything at all, on a national scale. Perhaps, when she loses her job as New York Senator, she can get a job as Senator from West Virginia, representing the people who she seems most closely-aligned with in philosophy and outlook.

jo jo   May 10th, 2008 11:58 am ET

Apparently, older, socially conservative, less educated, non-black blue-collar workers are a scary bunch of critters….. and 70% of them in WV have a gun. Yikes! Sounds like the Appalachians are the great divide for racism. Virginia didn't have such a problem in giving Obama a win. Hill Billy must have a nice ring to it in WV.

Hillary can use WV and Kentucky as feel good states for her and make the descent of her campaign plane more comfortable. She can then put on her coal miner outfit and stump the states to win them for Obama iin the fall — ha ha — fat chance as there will not be much in it for her then.

vic nashville,Tn   May 10th, 2008 11:58 am ET

race is not over

Roland   May 10th, 2008 11:58 am ET

It will show that Clinton has connected with her sheet-wearing base . . . WV and KY (the home of the Klan). Remember, she should win these by a tremendous margin because of all the racists who live in these two states.

(Shame on you CNN. All I have done is clarify what you are too scared to put in print . . . you pandering bunch of weenies.)

An Outsider's Perspective   May 10th, 2008 11:58 am ET

If I were a West Virginian, I would be incensed with my persona being labeled as "uneducated", "those who did not attend college", and so on, proclaiming to the world at large that 66% of my state belongs to this category!

It would be bad enough that the Newsmedia were creating this label as it analysed the demographics of my nation and found this statement to be true.

It would be infinitely worse that someone who wanted my vote would define me as uneducated and driven by my closedminded inability to absorb and become part of the world at large – or even the mosaic of my country, America! I would consider that the candidate was insulting me – implying that if it wasn't for my lack of education, my ability to analyse not being present, this candidate could easily hoodwink me into voting for them.

If I was American, I would be ashamed that in the world's largest superpower a single state could hold this large a percentage of its population unable to grow with the advanced strides that humanity has made as it hurtles off to conquer new worlds. This would not be something I would want to parade day in and day out in the news.

I would want West Virginians to hold all their traditions dear and gain from education in this current age!

As a Canadian onlooker it is good to see that you as a country can elect a woman or a black man. You have come a long way America. Hopefully, you will be able to say that your people are educated, that your people are healthy, that your people have ideals, dignity, and integrity and that you truly are a just society.

This will happen someday, if not today or tomorrow.

Mike   May 10th, 2008 11:58 am ET

This just shows that outside the black community Obama has minimal support. He only goy 1/3rd of the white vote in his 'blowout' in NC. Blacks make up 12% of overall voters. They always vote Democratic anyway, so Obama as a candidate doesn't bring any new demographics to the table. McCain will appeal to the mainstream voters and independents much more than Bush ever did. He'll get the conservative vote, because they have no other tolerable choice. He'll get a lot of the Reagan Democrats. Unless the Dems nominate someone with broader appeal (i.e. Clinton), they will be toast in Nov. If it's one thing the Democratic Party excels at, it's snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. They always default to the most liberal choice, and most Americans aren't that liberal.

Outsider   May 10th, 2008 11:58 am ET

If this is a reflection of a significant part of American voters, then Obama's supporters should avoid confronting them, otherwise the former may be absebt or vote for MCain in the election

The DA Enforcer   May 10th, 2008 11:57 am ET

This just goes to prove that there are still bigoted, hatred-filled, and Hell-destined Americans. For somebody not to like anybody else who is not native-born white, this speaks volume of their evil nature. God commanded us to love everybody. And for somebody to dislike somebody just because of their skin color is a fact itself that the bigots have no place in America.

Vote for a candidate based on your conscience and not skin color.

I am not even a black by skin color but this is what we ,the whites, should do – follow our conscience.

In my job, I would prosecute you to jail whether or not you are black, white, blue, or whatever.

An American in Canada   May 10th, 2008 11:57 am ET

I hope they come out and vote for her by 90 points or more…

That would be marvelous… Thanking you in advance, West Virginia!!!

Caroline   May 10th, 2008 11:57 am ET

What will it mean? If she keeps her lead, it means that West Virginians would rather elect a provably corrupt lyiing pandering divisive white woman than a decent man of mixed race.

Nothing particulary against West Virginians; one could say that about any person that has thus voted for Clinton, and I can't figure out why anybody votes for her.

I couldn't figure out why anybody voted for Bush either. And especially the second time.

I would never in a gazillion years vote for that horrible woman!!

stacy   May 10th, 2008 11:57 am ET

Go Hillary, save us, stay in.

andrew   May 10th, 2008 11:57 am ET

A big win in West Virginia will not mean a thing to the nomination.

What it might mean otherwise is that the media will continue to fuel Billary's delusions, giving them time to stay in the news some more.

With each day she remains in the race I am donating funds to an account that will go to support her Democratic challenger in the next Senate race. Her race-baiting pandering is, as P. Noonan wrote, "vulgar." This is what Senator Kennedy was referring to regarding her lacking the character to be considered for VP.

faye, NV   May 10th, 2008 11:56 am ET

It has been said by Obama that Billary will win and by large numbers. She wants to prove how white she is and that whites will not vote for a black man.

So sad to how low she will go. I see America people are still with slavery thinking. This country will never change and people like the Clinton's should not be in any office.

This campaigne has made me sick.

Jonas   May 10th, 2008 11:56 am ET

Its a nice day out here in New Jersey. I was just thinking about buying myself a sandwich. So is there anything interesting in the news today? How about the gas prices around the country.

peter   May 10th, 2008 11:56 am ET

What happened? Obama suporters lost their voice? Usually there is a lot of hateful comments in everything about Hillary. They don't get it
Regardless who is the nominee, Hillary has given voice to millions of people. I am one of them. GO HILLARY

Hillary/McCain   May 10th, 2008 11:55 am ET

I'm a Hillary supporter but I'm not so sure she will win this big time. The main stream media has already kicked her out of the race. Many people in West Virginia who were orginally going to vote for her and are listening to the news, may not vote for based on what the main stream media has been saying. Then when she doesn't win West Virginia big time the main stream media will claim that this is proof that more and more people want her to quit. It goes to show you the power of the media in dictacting what happens in this country and world. The main stream media has been trying to kick her out of the race since January and it's depressing.

David   May 10th, 2008 11:55 am ET

Hillary should run as an independent.

Susan Missouri   May 10th, 2008 11:55 am ET

Hillary is still be in the race!

She is very intelligent, for the people… all the people, experienced, and a fighter.

We feel she will win the democratic nomination!

Hillary 08!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

john   May 10th, 2008 11:55 am ET

Clintons Last gasp. maybe a net 15 pledged delegates immediately nullified by 17 supers declaring for Obama.

This last gasp is all about Hillary's ambitions maybe the vice presidency and the Clinotn legacy it is not about the electorate the party or the Country.

TimeToUnite   May 10th, 2008 11:55 am ET

it is clear that Obama is doing minimal campaigning in West Virginia and Kentucky. He is focusing on Oregon and the general election. Today is Obana's 50 state voter registration drive. It's a movement. Obama supporters please go to his Website and find locations near you to help! Obama's campaign is a movement…a truly amazing time in our lives to see Americans of every corner pull our country up! Sorry CNN we have all moved beyond the Clinton's failed quest to capture the nomination. With 9 delegates supporting Obama on Friday, it looks like Washington is looking beyond as well. Please post!

Obama Supporter   May 10th, 2008 11:55 am ET

West Virginia wake up, a vote for Hilary is a vote for higher gas prices, no healthcare resolution once again, high food prices, no advances in alturnatives fuels, high insurance rates, more NAFTA, bad goods from China, nothing will change. She is bought and paid for by oil and other lobbyist. She is broke and in debt, niice way to run a campagine, good going Hilary. Is this the way you will run our country? You are no Bill Clinton!

She is old school Washington business as usual. West Virginia is doing well to want more of the old ways of Washington.

She can not win!!!

sozzi   May 10th, 2008 11:54 am ET

It will mean that White Working Clas voters will only vote for a White Candidate, Which is NOTHING.

walli   May 10th, 2008 11:54 am ET

simply put; absolutely nothing!!!

ColinBeau   May 10th, 2008 11:54 am ET

What does it mean? It might mean that sje picks up a few points and then Barack will crush her in Oregon and get those points and more. I hope that he gets it– I voted Republican the last few times for president, but I feel that we can't have the same status quo in there… She won't accomplish anything– talk at work is also that the US is so convoluted right now, that regardless of who gets in the white house, it will be so difficult to bring about change that any one in there will only be setting the stage for success or failure for the person who is in there down the road– Clinton (Bill) only looked successful because the aftershocks of Reaganomics were still eeking out huge capital gains… he was no better than George Senior. FACT. I think Obama will make lots of mistakes and screw up, but no more than Hillary or McCain– it's the team he has that will enable change— He has a greater potential to get people in his cabinet who are willing to take an educated, well thought-out risk rather than the "we know what the people want to be fixed, and we know how to do it!" kind of attitude.
She will win West Virginia, but c'est la vie, I am hoping to God, Buddah, Allah, and/or Vishnu that this will end soon— Good luck Mr. Obama and don't let WV sweat you any…. I believe he can do it!

Jason Means   May 10th, 2008 11:54 am ET

What does it mean…? Sadly it means that the good God fearing people of West Virginia are easily fooled by shady politicians.

Obama will loose by large margins in the "Mountain State" because he stands for change (something old crusty WV voters just don't want) and because he's black.

And before everyone starts hooting and howling about my commets – let me remind one and all that I live in WV, and have to put up with its crusty welfare population every day. I can't even tell you how many times people have approached me at work or on the street to tell me that they're voting for Hillary because they think Obama is a sleeper cell Muslim – or, that they just couldn't vote for anybody who's name rhymes with Osama.

With that type of insane logic, Obama doesn't stand a chance. All I can say is that I wish him luck in the general election and hope that the rest of the country doesn't pay too much attention to this upcoming WV primary… I'm embarresed enough as it is.

There is a lot.....   May 10th, 2008 11:54 am ET

There is a lot to be said about this article. But to imply that Hillary Clinton is the only way the Democratic can win West Virginia, is a heck of a statement. Truly, is there no other good running mate that Obama can select that would increase the chances of getting West Virginia? I think when it comes to selecting a VP, all this will factor into it and we will just have to see who he picks!

MR. AMERICA   May 10th, 2008 11:54 am ET

MR. AMERICA thinks them West Virginians is clingin to them guns, bibles, and white candidates….

kay, NM   May 10th, 2008 11:53 am ET

WV primary is irrelevant. Important states are: IO, ID, AL, AK, MO,MS, SC, VA, WY, IN, WI, ND, SD, TX etc. where Obama will win landslide in November!

Susie   May 10th, 2008 11:53 am ET

I pray every day and night for a miracle that will make Hillary the nominee. If only I could believe the Democratic Party has not lost its bearings and, once more, will nominate a candidate who cannot be elected. I am one of the most liberal people I know. I was totally against the Iraq war from the beginning. I have voted for every Democratic nominee since Carter. I was sure Kerry could never be elected before his nomination was confirmed (I was right) but I knew he was qualified just too liberal to be elected. I cannot vote for a candidate as inexperienced and uninformed about the issues as Obama.I don't know if I will stay home or vote for McCain but I know I cannot vote for Obama. This is not spite nor is it racism; I simply do not believe Obama is qualified to be President.

Moses   May 10th, 2008 11:52 am ET

Note to CNN, know one cares about the West Virginia hill billies, the race is over already.

Democrat 08

Rob - Georgia   May 10th, 2008 11:52 am ET

Like it or not, Obama cannot win the general election with the African American vote alone. Not enough of the white Democratic base support him and will go for McCain. I know blacks will support Obama until the very end but it just won't happen in November. If these so called "educated" people support him you would think they would be smart enough to see that. Obama winning in November is a pipe dream. We must have a Obama/Hillary ticket or a Hillary/Obama (even better) to win the White House.

Fred   May 10th, 2008 11:52 am ET

That dishonesty is not important. All that matters is that they are white

Bubble Burster   May 10th, 2008 11:52 am ET

Give it up CNN, it's over. For one, ARG is a joke, you know it, I know it, the world knows it. I can conduct a better poll then the pirates at ARGGG.

Second, no matter what the outcome is, the race is done. It's just a matter of going through the motions until May 20th.

Third, I comfirmed today that both Obama and Clinton got the support of 200 Superdelegates each sometime before the month started. Yeah I caught that "comfirmation" garbage you tried to pull in yesteredays story about picking up Superdelegate support.

You are shameless and transparent at this point. Go back to reporting the news instead of creating it. That's what Fox is for.

Joe, Maine   May 10th, 2008 11:52 am ET

Once again…CNN (Clinton News Network) can spin all they want. The race is over.

robert jones   May 10th, 2008 11:51 am ET

IT'S OVER HILLARY CLINTON!!!!

s.positive   May 10th, 2008 11:51 am ET

nothing much, The matrix is against her

Gatsby   May 10th, 2008 11:51 am ET

All this primary will do for Hillary is confirm that she still has support amongst the same voters she always had support from.

john q public   May 10th, 2008 11:50 am ET

This primary will not influence outcomes at all. It is pretty meaningless.

Brian   May 10th, 2008 11:50 am ET

It will be the same as the losing team scoring a hail mary TD in the losing seconds of a blow out. The only winners are the bookies.

Scott C   May 10th, 2008 11:50 am ET

The main stream media will do anything to make this race look like it isn't over.

Since Tuesday they have called the race for Obama and said it was over. They said West Virginia was going to go heavily for Clinton, as was Kentucky, but it didn't matter, because she still couldn't win.

Now here we are half a week later, and they must be worried about their ratings, because it is now time to sew doubt about Obama again to get people to tune back in.

A black guy just plain isn't going to win in West Virginia and Kentucky… It has nothing to do with policy that they are voting for Clinton, they are a VERY rural, red neck, hillbilly place, and they are racist. In the little time I have spent in West Virginia I heard more racial slurs than anywhere else I have been in the country.

West Virginia means nothing, they are, and always were going to go to the Republicans in November.

Let it rest CNN, stop picking at the wound of the Democratic race while it is trying to close.

dave in RI   May 10th, 2008 11:50 am ET

….and this is news why? Isn't there already a story on the ticker based on Clinton's huge lead in WV. At least her lead matches something……her ego

Dawn   May 10th, 2008 11:49 am ET

It means nada. This will not do anything and CNN knows it!
tHis is the reason for all the West Virgina stories. You want to make it to something. She can keep going all she wants. Obama needs to focus on Mccain and ignore Mrs Clinton. She wants attention. We the America people have decided! Obama 08! Tell her to continue her race baiting.
Obama should never consider the Clintons for any position.

no race card   May 10th, 2008 11:49 am ET

It means the Obama campaign screwed themselves by playing the race card to secure the African American vote. It was hateful and created a division in the party.

Now they are stuck with calling everyone who does not vote for Obama, a racist.

It isn't true.
Low income, uneducated African Americans are Obama's black base. They are the equivilent of Blue-collar white voters.

DrFill   May 10th, 2008 11:49 am ET

What might WV mean?
Uh…..nothing
DrFill

James, Wichita, KS   May 10th, 2008 11:49 am ET

Hey GENIUS… what was the percent for Obama in Kansas, Idaho, Alaska, Colorado, Minnesota, Georgia, etc… all 65%+ wins by Obama.

West Virginia means very little at this point.

D.   May 10th, 2008 11:48 am ET

I've said it before and will say it again, that region of the country is not just socially conservative, it's big time Klan territory. Which is not to say that everyone in West Virginia is a gap toothed idiot, as I'm sure some people unfortunately think… I actually like the state myself. But the point is that there are enormous numbers of people who do live there who would die before they saw a black man in the Oval Office.

Concerned Canadian   May 10th, 2008 11:48 am ET

It means there are large pockets of the population that are in the Democratic base that will vote for Hillary Clinton and not Barack Hussein Obama.

This means head to head , straight up guts poker style election versus McCain, Obama will lose. I'll bet anyone on this. I'll even give the person 3 to 1 odds. Any takers ? No. I thought so.

She carried the big states in the primaries..Obama didn't. In a general election Obama won't be able to duplicate that result in the big states versus McCain. If anyone is talking about the math that really really really counts and I mean really count….Hillary Clinton is the person for the job to go up against McCain if the Dems want a realistic chance to regain the White House.

Gee..I must be a political genius for saying this. So proud of myself. The DNC should hire me as chairman….I will do a 100 times better job than that screaming heehaw guy Howard Dean. What a piece of work that guy is. If I were him I'd start putting applications in all over the place because he's losing his present job pretty soon.

Matt   May 10th, 2008 11:48 am ET

Not much at this point in the game….run the numbers. Hillary has to get 85 percent or more of the remaining vote to win the popular vote… not a chance…I dont think that the Superdelegates are unwise enough to go against the popular vote in a a nomination of this historic magnitude.

I guess the thing that amazes me the most is that West Virginia is behind Hillary…..It is largely a blue collar state….How in the heck did she convince them that she is on their side when she and her husband have made millions on the exportation of blue collar work? Is West Virginia so
narrow minded that all that they are concerned with is coal? I would hope that most Americans would have more integrity than that.

Julie   May 10th, 2008 11:48 am ET

The Dems CANNOT win in November if they cannot carry states such as West Virginia, Pennsylvania, Florida, California, and Indiana…. all states that Hillary Clinton has won.

Yes, Obama has won more states, and also leads in the popular vote, but we need to remember these are the primaries, and in order to win the white house in November, we NEED the big swing states that Hillary has won.

It's time to seriously consider a "dream ticket," for without one, McCain will easily win. Let's get our act together people!

Jonathan of Tampa, FL   May 10th, 2008 11:48 am ET

She will do great in this state. The problem is this state is not a snapshot of the entire United States of America, it's not diverse enough.

Joseph Adewole   May 10th, 2008 11:48 am ET

Nothing!! She has outlived her usefullness to The Americans; you only need to go to Google website and find out about Hillary; those people supporting her now are the people that want to divide America. Hiillary cannot deny the fact that she made a donation to a terrorist organisation, what of watergate and others to say a few. the Clintons even have the gut to visit and campaign in America Universities when no University is good enough in America for Chelsea……Are Americans really God loving? Otherwise Black and White Americans should live together as brothers and sisters so that the world outside America will be a better place; if we all look unto Americans as leader and the Clintons are engaged in what they are saying and doing about White voters Black voters, where is your leadership quality?

charlize   May 10th, 2008 11:48 am ET

It doesn't mean much really. Say the voting is 66 percent to 23 percent, as mentioned in the article above. Even so, WV has only 39 delegates at stake, so it would be 25 Clinton, 10 Obama; a net gain of only 15 for Clinton, which won't help her much, both in delegates and popular vote. Even for statistical purposes, she couldn't say either, that after WV she got the biggest beating in the race, since Obama has beaten her by much higher margins IN A GREAT NUMBER OF STATES, for example in Idaho she beat her 80 to 17 (63-point lead); in Hawaii it was 76 to 24; in D.C. it was 75 to 24; inj Kansas 74 to 26, to only mention a few. Even though it would be her highest-percentage beating over bama ever, IT DOESN'T MEAN MUCH REALLY, AND THE MEDIA SEEMS TO AGAIN BE GIVING HER TOO MUCH IMPORTANCE AND KEEPING HER IN THE RACE IN ORDER TO KEEP HIGH RATINGS, that's all.

mud   May 10th, 2008 11:47 am ET

it has no bearing at all!! When will you, the press, realize that you have done enough damage to the democratic party already by making people think Clinton has had any chance at all since April. She coil win the rest of the states by 70% and STILL MOT HAVE ENOUGH DELEGATES!!!

It's OVER, get it through your thick skulls!!!!!!!!!!

L   May 10th, 2008 11:47 am ET

It really won't mean anything. Just like all the states that Hillary dismissed after she lost – she lost DC by 50%. Obama losing WV, even by a large margin, isn't a big deal, he has still won double the contests.

end it.   May 10th, 2008 11:47 am ET

w. virginia likes hillary. okay, but even if she wins 100% there and then 100% in kentucky, she still won't have more delegates than obama nor will she have won the popular vote.
it's funny how she says she's won the "important states" but when addressing w. virginians she says every state is just as important…
but her argument for nomination is that she can carry the "important states" in the fall….
end it hillary, get out now and let us unite!

Bill - Charlotte   May 10th, 2008 11:47 am ET

It will mean a lot to "Hillary in Wonderland."

Marty   May 10th, 2008 11:47 am ET

west virginia means nothing race is over

Mohammad, Los Angeles CA   May 10th, 2008 11:47 am ET

This evil woman will never give up.

Media Blackout May 15th   May 10th, 2008 11:46 am ET

I saw The Gimmick Candidate last night. She did a terrific job in dividing the Democratic Party even more during her speech. Why, as a matter of fact, she laughed it up when the Gov said he will place Obama's picture on a milk carton citing: "Where in the world is Obama'. Sounds like a movie coming soon to a theater near you huh Hillary? Another reference to the Middle East and you just laughed…… and laughed….. and laughed……. I'm glad you had a great time with that joke….

I particularly liked her comments around Obama didn't care for Kentucky because she was the only candidate there. But the one that grabbed my heart the most is when the Gimmick Candidate said her base was right there in the audience, which was filled with white older voters.

Thank you Gimmick Candidate for showing the world the type of racist you are. I guess you never had to show your real side because you and your Gimmick husband always thought you had black folks in your hip pocket, but now you're under stress the real side comes out with ease without a blink of an eyelash.

Pack up your trash Gimmick because NYS will NOT be reelecting you for ANYTHING!

Ludovic   May 10th, 2008 11:46 am ET

It will mean the same thing then Hawai, missisipi, NC or any other state obama won with a similar margin.

Indiana man   May 10th, 2008 11:46 am ET

it means that us dumb -low income– stupid white folks – who work our hearts out are smart enough not to vote for a liar and panderer.
the lady has a mental problem'
go back to arkansas if they will have ya.

SLDV2000   May 10th, 2008 11:45 am ET

It means that West Virginia will for the first time in the states history be able to decide anything consequential in it's Primary history. They should mark this date down in their history books…oh that's if they could learn to read and write.

poyoray   May 10th, 2008 11:45 am ET

This means if the superdelegates choose now, then this will be one of the most undemocratic primaries in history. It means that some of Hillary's strongest states are being taken away from her.

It means the supers are not waiting to decide until everyone votes and after more than 40 contests, they get to be the ones to tell voters that their votes don't count.

It is dividing the party by deciding on a nominee until everyone gets a chance to vote. The best way for them to unite the party would be to let everyone vote and see what the results are and then make a decision.

D Taliga   May 10th, 2008 11:45 am ET

West Verginaen how cane you vote for Hillary whom made politics from your children blood and sent them to Iraq to be killed 30,000 wounded and killed as well trillions of USD you pay.that it was popular.She supported the war just to be the next president.
it is her judgment.also whom finance her all corruption of lobbyist.
She stop to be Democrat when a Democrat will concide alone

Looking towards November   May 10th, 2008 11:45 am ET

Not a thing!

what it means   May 10th, 2008 11:45 am ET

It means that the race card Obama played in SC and has continually OVER played is now coming back to haunt him.

You cand not be a uniter and then use racial division for your own political gain as Obama did.

It proved him to be a lying, hypocrit

Joan   May 10th, 2008 11:45 am ET

Hey CNN, It means that YOUR candidate Hillary Clinton will win the nomination. Won't you be happy?

peter   May 10th, 2008 11:44 am ET

West Virginia kows that she will not win the nomination even the result is 100 to 0. They are clever people and they dont want to swim in a dry river. They will go to Obama.

PD from CA   May 10th, 2008 11:44 am ET

What will it show? Nothing. Obama isn't even campaigning in the state. He's moved on to a national campaign against McCain. There have been Hillary states… there have been Obama states. That will continue until June. The point now is that regardless of how well Hillary does in any upcoming primaries (barring some impossible sweep of all upcoming primaries), she cannot win the nomination unless she has enough superdelegates committed to overriding the voters' choice. And that's not going to happen. The "Hillary states" just weren't enough to give her the win.

Des,Toronto   May 10th, 2008 11:43 am ET

What do you expect with her most recent statement that Obama cannot get the white votes and how they are flocking to her. She plays the race card against her opponent ,who by the way is in the same party. She is extreemly divisive. In any event Obama is not revengeful or vindictive and will be president for all the people, whether or not they voted for him.

Obama 08 and 12

Ding   May 10th, 2008 11:43 am ET

Hey..is she still running ????

sue   May 10th, 2008 11:43 am ET

So she wins West Virginia! It doesn't change the math. OBAMA is the presumptive nominee. Hip Hip Hip Hooray!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

why the racist labeling?   May 10th, 2008 11:43 am ET

I'm confused:

When low income, uneducated African Americans ( the black equivilent of blue-collar white workers) support Obama- that is a good thing, and not racist (even at 90-95% rates).

When low income, uneducated white Americans ( the so-called blue collar workers) vote for Clinton at rates of 60-65% it is considered racist.

Can someone explain this double standard to me?

Terry H   May 10th, 2008 11:43 am ET

Hillary could win the last few states by 100% and the party leaders will STILL refuse to GET IT! Americans, true americans, people who want to save their country, want HILLARY! Well, the party may screw Hillary in this primary but the patriotic democrats will screw the party come November. NO OBAMA! NOT NOW NOT EVER!

just asking   May 10th, 2008 11:42 am ET

When low income, uneducated African Americans ( the black equivilent of blue-collar white workers) support Obama- that is a good thing, and not racist (even at 90-95% rates).

When low income, uneducated white Americans ( the so-called blue collar workers) vote for Clinton at rates of 60-65% it is considered racist.

Can someone explain this double standard to me?

Mike   May 10th, 2008 11:42 am ET

Let's not forget they're also mostly white. Just like North Carolina is mostly black. Why is the "race issue" the pink elephant in the room that you Democrats refuse to address? I suppose it wouldn't be politically correct, would it? It's going to be fun to sit back and watch your party implode.

Dana Mulder   May 10th, 2008 11:42 am ET

Whatever happens,Obama must go and campaign in West Virginia.
Otherwise he'll be criticized for not caring for the small states after he's sealed the deal..his most wins has come from small states..so he must show up there..
By the way…
Go OBAMA 08 !!

Jack   May 10th, 2008 11:42 am ET

It is wonderful to be back in Oregon,” Obama said. “Over the last 15 months, we’ve traveled to every corner of the United States. I’ve now been in 57 states? I think one left to go. Alaska and Hawaii, I was not allowed to go to even though I really wanted to visit, but my staff would not justify it.”

The video below is submitted for your enjoyment. You just know that of Sen. John McCain had said this, they’d have shipped him off to a nursing home…

The O   May 10th, 2008 11:42 am ET

it just means that there are alot of uneducated people in WV. Oh but I jest, "WINK WINK" it does not mean a thin. Does it put here in the lead of any of the numbers NO!!!!!!!

BARACK THE VOTE!!!!!!!!!!!

Marc in DeKalb, IL   May 10th, 2008 11:42 am ET

1.) 43 points was the result of the latest ARG poll. It was 15 points the time before that. The polls have been WILDLY fluctuating in WV, indicating it is unlikely they mean anything. Still, Clinton *WILL* take the state….

2.) It will mean nothing. 28 delegates are stake. She is behind significantly more than that. Even if she pulls off a 40 point lead and gets most of the delegates, it is too little too late.

Fishers, IN   May 10th, 2008 11:41 am ET

Barack Hussein Obama will never be elected President of the USA.

Think about it!

Enough said.

Hillary Clinton '08 & '12

leon   May 10th, 2008 11:41 am ET

TO ALL HILLARY SUPPORTERS!!!!

Let's start a ride to vote for McCain or do not vote. Let's show we will never support Barck Obama who has painted himself as false politician as someone he is not. He is an average politician who is moved by his political ambition and will say anythng to confuse voters and create a false image.

OBAMA go home! GO to Illinois with your whole family and try to fix your state first. Do really something for teh African-American community but something for real and then came back.

JC   May 10th, 2008 11:40 am ET

WV will never vote for a black man. That's the bottom line. Older voters are racist and everyone knows it. That's why Hillary takes them.

Indiana man   May 10th, 2008 11:40 am ET

be like me and others in west virginia
buy a copy of GLOBE magazine this weekend and find the real hilary clinton..
the list goes on and on….
happy reading folks

josh   May 10th, 2008 11:40 am ET

Hey guys was just wondering do you think Hillary should run as an independent. She could and she could possibly win. What do you all think?

Tee   May 10th, 2008 11:40 am ET

Does this mean the people of WV are racist?

double standard   May 10th, 2008 11:39 am ET

Why is it wrong or racist to say that WV is full of hardworking white voters? Isn't that true?

Wasn't SC full of hard working African American voters?

gerald strother   May 10th, 2008 11:39 am ET

TAKE A LOOKS A REAL POLLS <Rasmussen Reports
5/4/2008
N=840

Hillary Clinton 56%
Barack Obama 27%
Unsure 17%
Source

David from Bremen   May 10th, 2008 11:39 am ET

IT MEANS CLINTON IS WASTING TIME AND MONEY ! NO MORE NO LESS !!!

HD   May 10th, 2008 11:38 am ET

She will win West Virginia, Kentucky and Puerto Rico.

Obama will win Oregon, Montana and South Dakota.

Obama will continue to pick up more superdelegates than Clinton.

Michigan and Florida will be settled and she will pick up about 20 more delegates than Obama.

With this, she can not catch him in pledged delegates and the Superdelegates will confirm his appointment before she and McCain have a chance to destroy him further.

Then Obama will pick John Edwards as his vice-presidential candidate which will help Obama win white rural voters in Pennsylvania, Ohio, North Carolina, Kentucky, Virginia, West Virginia, Arkansas, Tennessee, Texas, etc.

Indiana man   May 10th, 2008 11:38 am ET

yea, we are dumb, low income blue collar workers here… and most of us are white and know enough not to vote for the bosnia snipper gal.
and we also get the magazines that other towns get. does that surprise you ????
we have been reading the GLOBE magazine may issue.
it tells us more than we really want to know about hilary..
local grocery and gas station convience stores have plenty of them to sell to.
to bad the clinton regeme didnt get them all bought up… ha ha.

Shirley Armstrong   May 10th, 2008 11:38 am ET

wake up people Obama can say anything and get away with it he is saying he does not use under handed politics. Just listen to him he sure does and he gets away with it WHY because the media is in awe of him. he WON THE SENATE BY DEFAULT HE HAS NO EXPENICE HE BASHES HILLARY AND GETS AWAY WITH IT. HE HAD AN AFFAIR THE MEDIA WONT COVER IT. WHAT ABOUT THE PASTOR HE HAS THE SAME VEIWS AS HIM HIS WIFE HATES AMERICA WHY WHY WHY IS HE STILL THE FRONT RUNNER

No Reservations   May 10th, 2008 11:38 am ET

Obama supporters are going to wake up and realize on November 5th that blacks, college students and hard left radicals are the only ones who voted for him!

Jon, Los Angeles   May 10th, 2008 11:37 am ET

In short, West Virgina is a bastion of cavemen. We are in 21st century but if they are stuck in time they would vote for McCain. I cannot find one reason why a Democrat would not vote for Obama other than racism and vote for McCain so that we remain in Iraq for 100 yrs and jobs shipped to overseas. Those Dems would be voting against their interest. But again, if one is stuck in 16th century anything can happen at the polling box.

David Lynch   May 10th, 2008 11:36 am ET

CNN. Stop using Carl Bernstein as a political consultant when talking about the Democratic primary. Its obvious he never says anything good about Hillay. Instead he comes off like an Obama hack. Boy, has he fallen from his former days. In order to be "Fair and Balanced"
cut out his commentary. It makes CNN, my favorite network look really biased.

Otherwise thanks for the great job you are doing on political coverage.

gerald strother   May 10th, 2008 11:36 am ET

NONE DO THE MATH IT IS OVER FOR HER !!!

JN   May 10th, 2008 11:36 am ET

She can have WV. She still ISN'T going to WIN the presidency. As much as she wants to send out hate e-mails, brag about how she can be president because of the WHITE vote, still be very deivisive, etc, her chances of winning are rapidly deteriorating!!! Take a look at the march today for "voters of change"! That ought to tell you about change we need in America! Go Barack…Don't worry, she can win the next six contests and never catch up with you!

This WHITE, 42 year old married female is very PROUD of you Barack and can't wait til the day she conceeds the race. I will be waiting with baited breath until she makes that announcement .

Frank, Dayton, Ohio   May 10th, 2008 11:36 am ET

It only shows that West Virginia really is a backwards state. But they have a right to their vote.

Ex-Hillary supporter   May 10th, 2008 11:35 am ET

It means Clinton's racist remarks the eve of West Virginia's primary were deliberate and timely and will bring her a win she craves.
Fortunately, the rest of the country is more enlightened, Obama will be the nominee and the country will benefit from a well deserved break from the Bush/Clinton years.

mike from texas   May 10th, 2008 11:35 am ET

CNN showing the poll, but they never show the how many delegate in
West Virgina. It is not the perfect report .

Norm   May 10th, 2008 11:34 am ET

Why can't people see a Hillary/Obama ticket that gives the dems the house for 16 years………. when has that happened? Obama still young he could use the experience. ..Hello!

david   May 10th, 2008 11:34 am ET

In short – it means nothing. As a democrat, I'm willing to part with WV's five electoral votes, in order to have a candidate that is more than the lesser of two evils.

Hillary can milk her racist white base in WV and KY, and then what? The people have spoken. Hillary should concede and then start immediately sucking up to Obama and the party. Personally, I think she's a horrible choice for V.P., but that really is her last shot – Hillary '16. I think she'll be 69 (ha)

Edward   May 10th, 2008 11:34 am ET

I'd like to see a poll of who people would vote for if all three candidates ran for President of the United States: Obama (Democrat), McCain (Republican) and Clinton (Independent).

Ken @ Charlotte, NC   May 10th, 2008 11:32 am ET

Although I have never lived in West Virginia I have traveled and worked extensively in state. I am acutely aware of the reason there are few African-Americans there. This state is 100 years behind all others in many areas. If Hillary wins West Virginia as expected I would say it was because her temperment was a close match for the people who live there.

HD   May 10th, 2008 11:32 am ET

West Virginia is important to the democratic party. Every state is important in the big picture. In the current race between Obama and Clinton (which is over by the way), this state is worth 26 delegates. She is spending all of her hard earned money on this state and will likely net a total of 10 delegates. He still leads pledged delegates by 150+.

Obama announced 6 superdelegates yesterday. This in itself erases the benefit in delegates that she will gain from West Virginia. More superdelegates will follow.

So bottom line is that a state that is one of the oldest and lacks social progression is obviously a great state for Hillary. It is 95% plus caucasian and lots of those rural folks won't vote for a black man. Period. So should those value reflect the values of the democratic party as a whole? I don't think so but everyone has an opinion.

If she wins by 44%, then she will only gain 10 delegates because he will get around 8 and she will get around 19. That is soooo small given the demographics in the area, the amount of money she is spending (which by the way her campaign is broke) and there are only two other contests up ahead where she will likely win….Kentucky and Puerto Rico (which has more delegates than New Hamphsire or Kentucky for some weird reason b/c Puerto Rico does NOT get votes in the general election….c'mon Howard Dean).

Sick of Her   May 10th, 2008 11:31 am ET

It will mean she will keep crowing about how she is the only one who can win "hard working" uh "white hard working" American voters. That just isn't true. Obama didn't get here with just the black vote. I am a hard working w/woman who strongly supports Obama.

Ardnuas   May 10th, 2008 11:30 am ET

It means this women is a NUT, and she is trying to DESTROY the Democratic Party. The Clintons' have NO SHAME…..NONE!!!!!
Obama/Edwards08

@americans   May 10th, 2008 11:30 am ET

Well, the polls show Hillarious closing in on Obama in N.C and leading in Indiana. What did the results turned out to be at the end of the day? DEAD WRONG!

So, CNN go ahead with your polls. Hillarious can win 100% WV votes and delegates and it wont make a dent on Obama's lead in popular votes, most pledged delegates, and his increasing super delegates count!

At this stage in the game, Hillarious is irrelevant! GAME OVER!

OBAMA WON!!

YES WE CAN!!!!!

Tina   May 10th, 2008 11:30 am ET

It means nothing. It is a prime demographic for Hillary and she has been expected to win WV all along. She's just trying to move the goal posts yet again…her win here will be cancelled out by an Obama win in Oregon, nothing that happens from here on out can put her in the lead.

It's over.

Educated Clinton Supporter   May 10th, 2008 11:29 am ET

What it will show is that Obama doesn't have a chunk of Democrats that he will need in November.

Obama doesn't think he needs these voters or he will be trying to court them. If Obama or his followers think that they will change their minds come election time, it shows they are living in kool-aid land.

Don't think for a minute that the DNC isn't worried about this.

Rob   May 10th, 2008 11:29 am ET

Get a clue Clinton News Network. She is done. Start reporting on some real political news.

Reality Time Hillary   May 10th, 2008 11:29 am ET

Question….. Hillary has ridden on the coat tails of her husband's presidency. Obama, a virtually unknown, has ridden on hope and inspiration and carries a little more than half of the country. Why is that she could not close the deal?

John Pittsburgh   May 10th, 2008 11:28 am ET

Why do you keep stringing the Hillary fans along? It's like when you act like you're throwing a ball for your dog but you don't really throw it. …It's sad.

After further review,Texas   May 10th, 2008 11:28 am ET

I know folks in the Bluefield area and we joke about the perception out of staters have and they tell me dont believe the polls.They do know panderers when they see them but they also have hope for a more prosperous West Virginia.They have been lied to for years and they want Change and change in their pockets.

Todd Parks   May 10th, 2008 11:28 am ET

I'm writing here because CNN closed their forum on a previous article related to West Virginia and the upcoming primary but I find it so offensive that because Hillary Clinton is up considerably in West Virginia that it means we (West Virginians) are obviously inbreed, redneck, and racist. Because we are voting for Hillary Clinton by a majority, many Obama supporters are blogging that we hunt from the back of pick up trucks and attend klan rallies…its so degrading…we cannot vote for Hillary just because we want to apparently…I am a 23 year old graduate student getting my masters in English Education and I was raised by a registered nurse and a coal miner. I come from a family of hard workers who have enstilled me with good morals that are not racist or redneck. I find it so offensive that when my state gets a say, many people in the United States play up on a stereotype which is so offensive…I know Sen. Obama isn't making these comments but I find it offensive that he's not working to win votes here…and I don't appreciate many of his supporters degrading myself or Appalachian heritage. I am going to step off of my soap box now.

jo   May 10th, 2008 11:25 am ET

basically West Virginians won't vote for a black guy. shocker.

lou from iowa   May 10th, 2008 11:25 am ET

Let her go out on a couple high notes. I wasn't supporting her, but I sure feel sorry for her when I see her campaigning anymore.

yappy   May 10th, 2008 11:24 am ET

Who cares ? She is acting wierder and wierder. I think she may have a break down before this is all over. Amazing that the young ,charasmatic black man is taking down a giant. Who would have known ? This Alaskan is extremely happy about that. I am tired TIRED of the Clintons.

honkey white guy from cali   May 10th, 2008 11:24 am ET

Hey Clinton News Network It means nothing duh!!!!!! He Has already won this one

fred   May 10th, 2008 11:24 am ET

Go Hillary!!

If not Hillary…then McCain!!

Paul   May 10th, 2008 11:22 am ET

It means nothing, just like her promises.

Jeanne   May 10th, 2008 11:22 am ET

It won't mean anything. Clinton can only win the nomination by superdelegates over ruling the pledged delegates & popular vote, where Obama has the lead, and it doesn't look like this is going to happen.

nate   May 10th, 2008 11:22 am ET

We at Camp Obama recognize the tremendous support HIllary has and we recognize her impressive capabilities. Our policies and goals are virtually identical and therefore respectfully request all Dems come together around the nominee.

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room. Download this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

Follow us on Twitter

CNN on TwitterGet Ticker updates the moment they appear online via the Web, SMS, or instant messages.
Follow politicalticker

Categories
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. All comments should be relevant to the topic and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. You are solely responsible for your own comments, the consequences of posting those comments, and the consequences of any reliance by you on the comments of others. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying and other information you provide via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2008 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com VIP