June 23, 2008
Posted: 03:30 PM ET

From

WASHINGTON (CNN) – A federal judge Monday promised to rule "as soon as possible" on a Congressional demand for White House documents and testimony, but not before expressing reluctance to do so, and scolding both parties for refusing to compromise.

"I didn't volunteer for this," lamented U.S. District Court Judge John Bates during a contentious three-hour hearing focusing on the balance of powers between the executive and legislative branches.

The battle stems from the House investigation of the controversial firing of nine U.S. attorneys by the Justice Department.

The Democratic-controlled House asked the judge to enforce a subpoena ordering former White House Counsel Harriet Miers to testify, and for Miers and White House Chief of Staff Josh Bolton to produce internal documents on the issue.

The White House has refused to hand over the material, asserting executive privilege.

Justice Department attorney Carl Nichols, representing the government, said the judge could avoid "putting his thumb on the scale" by throwing out the lawsuit, but that a decision to support Congress would "fundamentally alter the separation of powers."

White House Counsel Fred Fielding and House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers, a Michigan Democrat, were among hundreds of onlookers in the ceremonial courtroom three blocks from Capitol Hill.

Bates appeared eager to find a solution which would avoid the court's intervention. He suggested sending the parties away to try further negotiations, but lawyers for the two sides accused one another of complete intransigence.

At one point, when House counsel Irv Nathan said Congress had the authority to send the Sargeant-at-Arms to arrest Miers, Bates suggested perhaps they should have done so.

Bates also indicated that it would be possible for the government to simply run out the clock. He said an appeal is certain no matter which way he rules, and the subpoena will expire when the current Congress leaves office in December.

Nathan acknowledged the outcome of the November elections will determine whether the next Congress chooses to re-new the subpoena.

Bates said he would give the matter the "time and attention it deserves" before ruling.

Filed under: President Bush


James, Redlands, CA   June 23rd, 2008 8:35 pm ET

I don't expect the Congress to do anything. This is just an effort to document the complicity of the Bush administration for history. The House is not going to send anyone to jail and force Bush to pardon then (or commute sentences like Scooter).

But it will be more testimony to way in which the Bush administration has used the Constitution like toilet paper. It will help to cement his place in history as one of the worst Presidents in history.

He and Chaney should be impeached. But they've put this country and the world in such a mess that I think I would do us great harm as a nation.

The sad thing is that they know that and continue to thumb their noses at us. Chaney has already said "So" to what the American people think and believe.

Joyce in Florida   June 23rd, 2008 8:29 pm ET

The Bush Administration is a disgrace and they are getting away with it. That judge should be FIRED. Why is everyone afraid to go against a President who has broken laws and should have been impeached years ago? Executive privilege my butt. I am sick and tired of hearing that comment as an excuse.

TheTruthHurts   June 23rd, 2008 8:26 pm ET

This judge is like most. Trying to protect his hide by not having to piss off either side. Guess what? That's the j.O.B. of a judge. Sure they should have compromised, but your job wouldn't exist if that happened every time.

What a joke? We can guess the answer.

Capt. Smash, Salt Lake City, Utah   June 23rd, 2008 8:26 pm ET

This judge must be one of the family; you The Bush Crime Family1

Look how many people still support Bush and this Bush crime family.

It's a done deal   June 23rd, 2008 8:26 pm ET

This judge is obviously a Republican. He should be dismissed and replaced with someone who isn't biased.

Long Arm of the Law   June 23rd, 2008 8:20 pm ET

I say yes — ARREST HARRIET!! Arrest anyone that has anything to do with the most corrupt administration in our nation's history. If she' s the only one we can reach at this moment — bring her in!

And then don't stop until Bush and Cheney are sitting in the Hague!

saga for Obama   June 23rd, 2008 8:16 pm ET

the chickens are going to come home to roost for the Bush administration…look forward to watching the new Fox reality show…Presidential Pardons, live from the white house. for to long they have been beyond the law, now we suffer… and people want to vote for Mr. Mccain? 4 more years? no way

Helen, NY   June 23rd, 2008 8:14 pm ET

These democrats have no other job. They just want to spend time and our money to go after George Bush. Some of the federal judges are also in link with these democrats.

Perla   June 23rd, 2008 8:09 pm ET

Every time I hear a Bushie claim "executive privilege," I say "Impeach the bums."

REPUB OF LA.   June 23rd, 2008 8:03 pm ET

What a waste Congress is!!!!!!! Get ready for 60% tax people. lmao
Get ready for crappy hospitaL care!!

Franky   June 23rd, 2008 7:52 pm ET

Run Mr. President!! Run!!! We gotta run!!!!

PMuffet   June 23rd, 2008 7:51 pm ET

I am willing to bet this judge is a Bush appointee to the bench.

independent   June 23rd, 2008 7:46 pm ET

sounds like the judge doesnt want to do his job.how much does he earn?this administration should be on a road-trip, in orange jumpsuits,on an old gray bus.one way trip to leavenworth.

Cynthia   June 23rd, 2008 7:39 pm ET

I guess everyone else wishes they had the luxury of being reluctant to do our jobs – in the real world you would probably be fired.

Nader   June 23rd, 2008 7:28 pm ET

Judge, in case you don't get it, you are part of the government and we are pissed!

Mike from kentucky   June 23rd, 2008 7:22 pm ET

It will never happen says King Bush

Mark   June 23rd, 2008 7:01 pm ET

The Democrats have turned even more disgusting than usual. They claim the Repubs are the divisive, hate-mongers, but this tribunal is all about getting press coverage. The supposed CIA leak was a non-issue. There were NO LAWS broken. Check the facts. That's why there were no charges other than a trumped up obstruction charge.

I was hopeful when the dems took control that things would change. I was right, except not for the better.

NORA, FLORIDA   June 23rd, 2008 6:57 pm ET

Wait a minute, What the hell does he mean he didn't ask for this. FIRE THIS IDIOT!!!! AND REPLACE HIM WITH SOMEONE WHO WANTS TO DO THEIR JOB.
I'm not concerned about his feelings or opinion (reluctancy). It is the law that he is suppose to be enforcing. Maybe he needs to be reminded of that.

Michelle from Colorado   June 23rd, 2008 6:55 pm ET

It would take a pretty stupid person not to realize that Bush has trounced on the Constitution of the United States time and again. And the way he has been able to do this is to fire lawyers with a conscience and get judges with none to hem and haw about how just or injust this was. slight of hand, folks. WSe don't need a judge to tell us whether Bush is a crook or not. We need one to punish him. But since Bush stacked the deck in his own favor, it will never happen.

Floridian   June 23rd, 2008 6:54 pm ET

Look, I support Obama, but I understand where this judge is coming from – this is a politically motivated investigation and a no-win situation.

Also, for everyone who says federal judges are lazy – there are lazy people in every profession, but most federal judges are very highly educated and do a really excellent job.

Gorbashov, Long Beach, Ca.   June 23rd, 2008 6:51 pm ET

Shut up and do your job…………………and start throwing members of the Bush Crime Family into jail!

jack shadenfruede   June 23rd, 2008 6:50 pm ET

I did not sign on for this WAR.Judge Bates is a disgrace.By tipping his hand about running out the clock he should take a job on TV.God save us with people like Bates in command of a court.

Upon Further Review   June 23rd, 2008 6:36 pm ET

Stand up like a man Bates.Hes scared the neocons will get him next.Do your duty and dont be a chickenlittle.

Vietnam Vet   June 23rd, 2008 6:34 pm ET

sO? tHROW HER BUTT IN JAIL UNTIL SHE DECIDES TO COMPLY WITH THE SUBPOENA!!

IT'S PRETTY INTERESTING THAT WHEN OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS
GET INTO A LITTEL HOT WATER THEY JUST HAVE TO RESIGN THEN EVERYTHING IS OK

I'M TIRED OF THIS CRAP – - -THROW THEIR BUTTS IN JAIL

Loretta from California   June 23rd, 2008 6:31 pm ET

Reluctantly? Are Judges suppose to express reluctance. Wouldn't this be perceived as a derelict in duty. Nice try Dems but the oil man has probably taken care of this ruling in advance.

Edward   June 23rd, 2008 6:30 pm ET

Perhaps this man should be something other than a judge. He "didn't volunteer for it."

What's the problem? If you decide according to the rule of law then Cheney and Bush and their criminal administration will ruin your career, judge? Like they did to Valerie Plame, committing treason, I believe, in so doing?

I cannot understand how this administration has been able to destroy our country, enrich themselves, break laws, cause the deaths of thousands, and no one will hold them accountable. Are there no people of values and substance at all involved in our government? To know that the brilliance of the founding fathers has been bequeathed to such an insatiably greedy, venal, and intellectually vapid group breaks my heart.

Sue in MI   June 23rd, 2008 6:29 pm ET

We have to get some answers from this White House-maybe it does mean arresting some criminals here. They are so afraid to talk….because they know they have been doing illegal things. I sincerely wish Pelosi had been the leader we expected her to be and gone after this administration a year ago! They are arrogant, Fascist in their beliefs, and have hurt this country. They deserve to be tried for war crimes as well. I hope this judge has a conscience and the ability to rule.

James in Florida   June 23rd, 2008 6:28 pm ET

This Judge is trying to hender a Federal Investigation and is probably a Republican. Contempt Charges should be filed on Bush aides and they all should be made to testifi under oath including Bush and especially Cheney and Car Rove.

If this Judge does not want to rule and uphold the law, let him be prosecuted for contempt himself.

I think this Judge should be investigate immediatly.

Mcshame   June 23rd, 2008 6:26 pm ET

Bush should be brought to justice with mccains lies

Bush Is An Idiot   June 23rd, 2008 6:24 pm ET

A little too late, the cookie jar is open and the contents are gone (our Constitution), but whatever.

D. Holiday, OH   June 23rd, 2008 6:22 pm ET

It's about time…burn baby burn! :-)

Enlightened Voter   June 23rd, 2008 6:12 pm ET

Those nine people were fired and their careers ruined because they disagreed with bush. BTW John MCWar supported their being fired. What does that tell you people? The repubs and mcwar will eliminate those in their way.

Peter North   June 23rd, 2008 6:10 pm ET

John Bates …

Do your job and rule in a timely manner. We'll be watching you.

We can impeach you if you begin to forget whose interests you are suppose to serve.

Anyone know who appoint Bates to the Federal judiciary?

Linda of Atlanta   June 23rd, 2008 6:10 pm ET

It seems to me that the Judge should require the Administration to turn over documents and require Administration officials to testify. If he doesn't, what will stop this Administration from repeating their practice of firing Democratic U.S. Attorneys who refuse to participate in the selective prosecution of Democratic public officials? The idea that Republicans can hide their dirty deeds behind executive privilege is outrageous. And it cannot be permitted to go uncheck.

linda from South Dakota   June 23rd, 2008 6:09 pm ET

sowhose bush payin off in this investigation???? let the truth be know,,,,, under the bush administration,, theres lot that isnt told to americans,, wonder why.. ummm come on judge,,, have it checked out …

Texas Trail Dog   June 23rd, 2008 6:07 pm ET

Why weigh contempt. They're guilty as Hades of giving the CIA Lady's name to the newsman. They along with the newsman who released the Agent's name to the press should be tried as traitors. The newsman, Bush, Cheney are three traitors as large as Patrick Henry.

Ardnuas   June 23rd, 2008 6:03 pm ET

We need judges with some BACKBONE to stand up to the Bush Administration….. but, it will NOT happen.

Brian G, Sugar Land, TX   June 23rd, 2008 6:00 pm ET

Looks like Bush has bought off the Judicial Branch of government.

Executive privilege, my backside. Bush uses this phrase to cover up his mismanagement and out and out lies.

Bush has got to go! We can not wait for the elections, we need impeachment NOW! Where the heck is Congress in all this?

Jaime   June 23rd, 2008 5:58 pm ET

Shut up and do your job judge, I know you didn't volunteer for this you unpatriotic piece, but you do work for me (the tax payer) so get to work you lazy public leach and put everyone in the Bush crime family behind bars. Sorry, but the hand greasing will stop in Novemember….

Oregon calling   June 23rd, 2008 5:58 pm ET

It's about D@#$#M time!

Paying attention to the REAL issues? No more warmongering Please!

Obama / DeFazio 08 :-)
(hey a person can dream, can't they)

What in the world!   June 23rd, 2008 5:58 pm ET

Any U.S. District Court judge who laments ""I didn't volunteer for this," from the bench needs to find a different line of work. Federal judges are appointed for life, yet this type of complaint from the bench smacks of one forced to rule against someone they favor. That is not impartial.

Our courts fortunately are the barricade of our country's Constitution and laws. When politicians have trampled rights, liberties and freedoms, failed to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States, then the courts are there to ensure the law of the land is upheld.

So to hear a U. S. District Court Judge "lament" about doing his job it alarming.

If you can't stand the heat, then get out of the kitchen.

Patrick Henry   June 23rd, 2008 5:55 pm ET

Bravo!!

It's about time this administration (especially top staff–including GWB) were held accountable for skirting the law and the constitution in pursuing their own personal agenda–and not the public trust.

Mimi De La Cruz for OBAMA   June 23rd, 2008 5:54 pm ET

THAT JUDGE SHOULD BE FIRED.

HE DIDN'T ASK FOR THIS?

THAT'S HIS JOB.

IT'S WHAT JUDGES DO, I THOUGHT.

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room. Download this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

Follow us on Twitter

CNN on TwitterGet Ticker updates the moment they appear online via the Web, SMS, or instant messages.
Follow politicalticker

Categories
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. All comments should be relevant to the topic and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. You are solely responsible for your own comments, the consequences of posting those comments, and the consequences of any reliance by you on the comments of others. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying and other information you provide via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2008 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com VIP