July 22, 2008
Posted: 11:30 AM ET
CNN

Watch Obama's press conference Tuesday.

(CNN) — Sen. Barack Obama said Tuesday he was pleased with the reduction of violence in Iraq since the deployment of more U.S. troops, but said it was a result of several factors, not just the surge.

Related: McCain camp hits Obama over surge

"We don't know what would have happened if the plan that I preferred in January 2007 — to put more pressure on the Iraqis to arrive at a political reconciliation, to begin a phased withdrawal — what would have happened had we pursued that strategy," Obama said after landing in Amman, Jordan.

"I am pleased that as a consequence of great effort by our troops — but also as a consequence of a shift in allegiances among the Sunni tribal leaders, as well as the decision of the Sadr militias to stand down — that we've seen a quelling of violence," he said.

Listen: CNN's Sasha Johnson reports on Obama's Jordan visit

But, Obama said, a functioning Iraq will ultimately depend on the capacity of the Iraqi people to unify themselves, get beyond sectarian divisions and set up a government that works for the people.

Full story

Filed under: Barack Obama • John McCain


S. Shay   July 22nd, 2008 3:49 pm ET

Obama acknowledged the obvious, there has been a reduction of violence in Iraq, he has said nothing about the so-called success of the surge because it’s not only been military effort that has reduced the violence. John McCain is making himself look more and more irrelevant every day. While Obama talks about things the American people care about, Afghanistan and OBL, bringing troops home, McCain is still talking about something that doesn’t agree with his own philosophy nor is it something the AP care about. If the surge is working and we are succeeding in Iraq then McCain should be in the forefront talking about leaving Iraq since things are better. Yet, he talks about staying there. Are the AP supposed to be dumb enough to side with McCain on his contradictory stance? I don’t think so.

john williams san diego, ca.   July 22nd, 2008 3:45 pm ET

The more obama talks without a teleprompter, the better McCain looks.

Marc PDX   July 22nd, 2008 3:37 pm ET

PS. the EU3 and the UN have been trying to pressure Iran to change since 2003. But, then, Iran hasn't had to deal with Obama yet – so I'm sure his mix of pressure and judgement will resolve the problems that the rest of the world couldn't in no time.

(Pssst! The king has no clothes!)

Dan in Phoenix   July 22nd, 2008 3:35 pm ET

Obama continues to show me that he has a better grasp of the situation in Iraq today and was right about opposing the war from the beginning. McCain on the other hand wants to give all of the credit to the surge which is actually only a component of the lessening of violence. No one who knows what has really happened in Iraq would give all of the credit to the surge. Obama sees that the ultimate soloution rests with the Iraqis and not with the US military. Our military has done everything we asked and more with great courage and honor but this war has still done great damage to our image, our military and our economy. Of the two candidates only Obama seems to grasp the overall effect of this war and only Obama was right from the beginning. McCain is a throwback to the good old Cold War days and wants to be sure that our involvement is perceived as a victory and not just a success. He has never to my knowledge defined what would be a victory. Obama has shown better judgment than McCain when it comes to Iraq.

Marc PDX   July 22nd, 2008 3:34 pm ET

Obama said: "I am pleased that as a consequence of great effort by our troops — but also as a consequence of a shift in allegiances among the Sunni tribal leaders, as well as the decision of the Sadr militias to stand down — that we've seen a quelling of violence."

Marc said: This was all due to the surge. Sunni's changed allegiance because the grew sick of Al Queda killing Iraqis (specifically Sunnis). Al Queda killed Iraqi's as a desperation attempt to stir up civil war since they were getting their butts kicked by way of the surge (remember?). The Sadr militia also stood down because they were getting their rear ends handed to them on a platter and Muqtada Al Sadr himself fled to Iran, where he remains… all because of (you guessed it) the surge!

So, you can try to simply increase the pressure on Iraqis (or Al Queda or the Sadrists or Iran) to change, but I doubt you find the same results that the surge brought. But you can try… (after all this is how you gain experience)…

Progressive Indie   July 22nd, 2008 3:33 pm ET

Ok, yes the surge may have helped to bring down the violence in Iraq. But why did we have to resort to a "surge" in the first place?
It's because our fearless and mindless president did not want to send the proper amount of men and equipment in the first place.

Every general that said the war could not be won with the limited amount of resources Bush and Dumsfeld would allow was asked to resign or decommissioned (fired). Then several years into the war and billions of dollars spent they decide to increase boots on the ground?

This war was a lie and Bush and his entire admin should be put in prison for it along with the other 30 felonies this president has committed. But we have ot wait until his term is out to prosecute him for his crimes since we can'not arrest a president while he is serving his term.

I can only hope that Obama will not pardon Bush for his crimes against the United States and the World.

DOWN WITH THE NEO-CONS.

Obama 08!!

kim hussein taylor portland, oregon   July 22nd, 2008 3:32 pm ET

"put more pressure on the Iraqis to arrive at a political reconciliation, to begin a phased withdrawal"

duuuuhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! only the insane see any other options besides obama's!

let's start listening to the SMART people of america, and not the morons and evil-doers we're stuck with for 181 more days!!!!!!!

bush's invasion has gone on for 7 YEARS and things have only continued to get WORSE and we are in more danger than we have ever been b/c of him! how does CONTINUING the failed invasion of iraq, and starting mccain's "more wars" help america???!? it doesnt!!! surely you mccain people know the definition of insane, doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result—mcCON will do the insane!!!

patricia Mo   July 22nd, 2008 3:32 pm ET

If it wasn't for our more troops in Iraq Mr. Obama wouldn't have been there. Thank God for people like McCain that has the sense to Know what is needed in Iraq and has a clear vision and plan. It is very important we win this war in Iraq and send a clear message to Terrorist abroad as well we will prevail and keep our country safe, even if it means to continue to stablize Iraq. It would be a grave mistake to not put our country's security first. Mr. Obama lacks the experience and his vision show it. He is a very scarey man.

Erika, KS   July 22nd, 2008 3:32 pm ET

It isn't hate, it isn't fear, it isn't even innuendo if it's true. Obama isn't experienced enough to handle the crap that Bush is leaving. He's part of the problem by his wishy-washy votes. He'll do and say anything that looks good in the press. Empty suit. Give me substance. But it's not him!

Mike from Westchester   July 22nd, 2008 3:30 pm ET

Oh, and Mike, Syracuse: Please get over yourself, ALL Americans have a right to an opinion, not just the ones who served in the military. What Constitution are you looking at? Obama is a U.S. Senator and has certainly EARNED the right, beyond being wildly intellegent, poised, and diplomatic, with obvious leadership qualities and excellent insight and judgment. The best candidate for President I have seen in my entire adult life – and I'm no spring chicken – Eisenhower was President when I was born.

therealist   July 22nd, 2008 3:27 pm ET

"Obama said after landing in Amman, Jordan.."

So why did Obama wait until he got to Jordon to wonder? He could have just ask the Iraqis if he really wanted to know the truth.

MMN-Milwaukee WI   July 22nd, 2008 3:25 pm ET

Mike of TX:

Once US stops paying the sunnis, Shiites, and Sadr Malitias not to fight each other the full blow civil war that Bush et al denied will be back forget the surge.

New Orleans 4 Obama   July 22nd, 2008 3:25 pm ET

Okay, ya'll are killin' me here! First of all, to comment on Jindal being slated for VP. You're kidding, right? Ya'll need to look at what has just happened recently here in Louisiana. Jindal came thisclose to being recalled because he got "punked" by the LA Legislature. They voted themselves a 300% raise and it took people petitioning for his and their recall for him to reverse himself and veto it! Come on now! He has potential but he has no "cohonanas" yet.
As far as McCain goes……never mind, he's too easy a target.
I appreciate the way Obama looks at the country, what it should and can be. I appreciate the fact that unlike a lot of others, not only does he have an opinion, he is acting on it. He was correct when he said that WE are the ones We have been waiting for. Obama 08/12

therealist   July 22nd, 2008 3:25 pm ET

Funny how Obama believes that self responsibility and stability is something that the Iraqis should achieve on their own. Because when it comes to Americans and their self responsibility.., well, they have to have the governments help. Evidently, Obama thinks Americans are too stupid to be responsible for themselves..

Marc PDX   July 22nd, 2008 3:21 pm ET

Cut and run? But for those of you who think McCain is a warmonger…. we're getting out of Iraq and ramping up the war in Afghanistan and maybe Pakistan (if Obama doesn't "refine" that position). Dems are warmongers!

Rave   July 22nd, 2008 3:21 pm ET

Why are we only talking about violence in Iraq. Violence has reduced after the surge… and also left several people in America – Jobless, Homeless, Gasless ??
Who cares if there is violence in Iraq when our own home is on fire? There are more countries with much worse violence..Somalia, Sudan, other African, Mid-East countries?? Are we going to start invading them.
McPain is dumb shi…… We are desperately in need of a leader like Barack Obama. Some people call him a muslim, but I see him as as decent, family loving, church going human being. He will be a perfect role model for our youth in the country
OBAMA (2008 -16)

Kristara Barrington   July 22nd, 2008 3:20 pm ET

Bush said, in April 2007, "when the Iraqi's ask us to leave, we'll go. They are a soveriegn nation with a democratically elected government".

Well George & John … based on what their Prime Minsters said to a German magazine (don't want to hear claims of liberal American press) … It is time to GO.

Stop trying to spin this another way.

NotFallingInLine.org   July 22nd, 2008 3:17 pm ET

Thank you, Senator, for pointing out the obvious.

We're supposed to trust YOUR judgment? You're nothing but a rhetorician-without-a-record wearing a nice suit.

The Democratic Party leadership has betrayed our core principles of democracy and has failed us all.

Midgea NFIL

PHIL TEXAS   July 22nd, 2008 3:14 pm ET

PLEASE READ OBAMAS BOOK "DREAMS OF OUR FATHERS""
VERY SCARY

YOU WILL BE CHANGING YOUR MIND TOO

PHIL TEXAS   July 22nd, 2008 3:12 pm ET

OBAMA IS CANDIDATE OF CHANGE! ! ! !

YES, , , CHANGING HIS MIND!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ON ALL THE ISSUSES///////////////////////

NewYorker Magazine Rocks   July 22nd, 2008 3:12 pm ET

Hey news media…

I'm still waiting for that picture of Obama somewhere in the Middle East, riding on a donkey with shooting stars in the sky beyond and flying angels all around him…

We must not delay the 2nd coming of the Messiah.

gotcha   July 22nd, 2008 3:11 pm ET

The obama idiots are scared silly.. They are scared that my darling Senator McCain will win, which he will, of course. I never heard such horrible blogs as they are writing. If they werent scared the blogs would be like they were written by a normal person, instead of a kool aid drinker. We will win, Senator McCain.

JD   July 22nd, 2008 3:08 pm ET

Mr. Obama has 143 days of actual on-the-floor working experience at the Federal level. Why, that's almost 4/10th of an entire year.

Wow, just wow. And SOME people have the nerve to say that he is inexperienced…….

no no no!   July 22nd, 2008 3:08 pm ET

LOVIN OBAMA

RealityKing   July 22nd, 2008 3:04 pm ET

i.e… If I'm elected, America troops are pulling out and we're not coming back to help no matter what happens.

Elly   July 22nd, 2008 3:03 pm ET

MCSame and others like the above blogs try to paint Obama as inexperienced
please tell me where experience has got American
down a path of constant war
I think most americans are willing to try *good judgement* and so do other countries apparently
Poll From Canada
Which U.S. presidential candidate would have a more positive influence on the Middle East?
John McCain 31%
Barack Obama 69%
This is not a scientific poll
point made!!

Elly   July 22nd, 2008 3:02 pm ET

MCSame and others like the above blogs try to paint Obama as experienced
please tell me where experience has got American
down a path of constant war
I think most americans are willing to try *good judgement* and so do other countries apparently
Poll From Canada
Which U.S. presidential candidate would have a more positive influence on the Middle East?
John McCain 31%
Barack Obama 69%
This is not a scientific poll
point made!!

sarah   July 22nd, 2008 3:01 pm ET

and still oblahblah cannot admit that he was wrong and mccain was right the surge worked. what an arrogant self righteous creep. he sound more like bush than anyone else in the government. ( i was not wrong, i just was not as right as i thought i was)

Bayousara for Hillary in November   July 22nd, 2008 2:58 pm ET

Oh….

I thought the elections were over.

Still goin' at it, Obamaians and McCainians?

Tony   July 22nd, 2008 2:57 pm ET

Couldn't agree more!

This comment by Heather Wilson, R-New Mexico was hysterical, especially after the last 8 years. Another republican completely out of touch with reality!

Her comment/statement was:

"He's not listening to the whole of what the Iraqi government was saying — he's hearing what he wanted to hear and what he thought would help him politically, which get backs to Senator Obama as a candidate for the presidency," Wilson said. "He has his finger in the wind, trying to figure out which way the wind is blowing, and he is not leading.

"He is no way sophisticated enough, I don't think — I mean he is frighteningly inexperienced when it comes to international affairs and national security policy," she added. "And he heard what he wanted to hear from the Iraqi government, without any context around it, and took that simple message and decided it helped him politically. That's the antitheses of what we should expect from a president of the United States."

Mark, B'ham., Al.   July 22nd, 2008 2:54 pm ET

The Cut and Run tactics of Obama and his lefty friends will not give the Iraqis the oppurtunity to stabalize and build thier country up to stand up for its self. Look at the Balkans, they are not as far along as Iraq is.

Christopher in TN   July 22nd, 2008 2:53 pm ET

Does McSame do nothing but react to what Obama says? What exactly is his plan for ending the war? We've heard nothing but what's wrong with what Obama is saying. Maybe he should have a press conference on the Iraqi-Pakistani border and tell us EXACTLY what his plan is! "Experience" my hindquarters!

Peter (CA)   July 22nd, 2008 2:53 pm ET

The surge has worked? Well, thank God that the bravery of the American troops has helped. But is seems naive to say the surge "worked"—sort of like "Mission Accomplished".

Whatever advantage we have is fragile and so much of it is based on factors such as paying the different factions. How long can we keep that up? Sadr may have been dealt a few setbacks but this is a dangerous man who will ultimately strike back with all of the force he can find.

But even if the surge is the reason for the changes, logic says we cannot pull back until the job is done. How long is that going to be? 5 years? 10 years? more? How many more American lives are we willing to lose? 1000? 5000? 10,000? How many more billions do we flush down the drain since the Iraqi government seems very comfortable letting us finance this mess?

The Right Vote   July 22nd, 2008 2:52 pm ET

Good point, Sandy! At some point we cannot occupy Iraq any longer. Iraq is telling us in a big way that the time has come for our troops to start exiting. Obama is recognizing the boundries of a sovereign nation with its own government. If we don't leave – then we are not practicing the idea of democracy.

Obama is right.

bernadette   July 22nd, 2008 2:51 pm ET

it is the Republicans who are frightening – they are once again resorting to Rove/Bush/Cheney fear tactics since McCain would have to change his views towards Obama's if he bothered to listen to what the Iraquis want. Since they don't have reason to fall on, they fall on 'fear-mongering' once again. McCain is starting to sound more and more like Guiliani- a noun, a verb, and 911

twofacedtony   July 22nd, 2008 2:50 pm ET

Is Obama going to withdrawal from Europe too? Or do we treat them differently??

HanoiFilms   July 22nd, 2008 2:49 pm ET

It is not the surge that succeeded, that is McCain's spin. The success stems from the Iraqis, primarily the Sunnis not cooperating with Al Qaeda. Let give the due to those who deserve it. That is why the generals still see the situation has reversible.

Joe Citizen   July 22nd, 2008 2:48 pm ET

This is a leader I can get behind …. I can't follow John McCain

Farrell, Houston, Tx   July 22nd, 2008 2:46 pm ET

McCain's arguments against Obama and Iraq are going to create his own demise. A fool should see it is not wise to continue this argument when Iraq has proven to say and do the exact opposite of what McCain is saying. Iraq did it to GWB and he has reversed, so what idiot would continue to bash Obama. McCain is going to fall like a deck of cards.

kayla   July 22nd, 2008 2:46 pm ET

even the iraqis want the u.S. out of there. why does the bush administration still want to stay. hum! i smell a big rat.

HRC supporter   July 22nd, 2008 2:42 pm ET

I always find it hilarious that Republicans say that Americans need to be responsible for themselves, a theory I actually agree with, but the Iraqi people, THEY need our help, lol…such hypocrites.

Vigla   July 22nd, 2008 2:39 pm ET

Lisa, you keep saying the same thing every day. "Obama looks scared out there" "He looks out of place" "He's elitist next to the troops", etc.

Not only are you blind, but you have no idea what you're talking about. He looks great and presidential. Imagine McCain making the rounds…he'd have to turn up his hearing aid to hear people talking to him and then make stupid comments like Iraq being next to Pakistan or not knowing the difference between Sunni and Shia.

You are ridiculous and everyone knows it. I'm calling you out.

Obama/Hillary 08   July 22nd, 2008 2:38 pm ET

Iraqis have to provide security to their country while we back them up. We cannot be in the forefront forever.

Smart Republican   July 22nd, 2008 2:37 pm ET

Say no to Jimmy Carter's second term.

what?????   July 22nd, 2008 2:30 pm ET

Mr. OBAMA violence is down in IRAQ plain and simple. D-O-W-N SURGE OR NO SURGE, but it worked so quit whining and admit MCCAIN was right NOW that is judgement in world affairs. Whiner.

aware   July 22nd, 2008 2:29 pm ET

Give it up Obama. :(

You were wrong about the surge, and you are wrong about Education and Drilling…!

Your charisma won't get you to the White house. You have no credibility or gravitas not to mention no experience or no judgment.

You can't even make a coherent, consistent statement with a team of 300 plus foreign affairs advisors! :)

MattH   July 22nd, 2008 2:29 pm ET

"Obama is 1000% CORRECT!"
1000 percent? *sigh* .These Obama supporters are really starting scare me.

doofus Cape Coral Fl   July 22nd, 2008 2:28 pm ET

the purpose of the surge was NOT less violence, athough that is certainly desirable. The purpose was to enable the Iraqis to strengthen their own government by means of conciliation and compromise. That has not been done yet.
We really would be in trouble if the large number of troops we sent did not reduce violence but did the Iraqis use that "peace interlude"well?

Independent-woman-4-Obama   July 22nd, 2008 2:28 pm ET

Well said, Sen. Obama! Ultimately, the Iraqi people have to come together to forge a strong, safe country. Sadly, the Bush/Cheney/McCain plan to bring democracy to a nation of tribes has failed and we will witness this when the Troops leave and they are in charge. Bush/Cheney/McCain wanted their oil, now that Big Oil is in there, they can consider it a success!

The war with Iraq has nearly BANKRUPTED our nation! But people like the "Puma-Hillary-or-else" still will vote for another failed GOP president!

The REAL war on terror is in Afghanistan. And we face enormous problems as a nation, which we need to solve.

One BIG question that no one from the McCain-side has dared to answer is: HOW WILL MCCAIN PAY OFF OUR NATIONAL DEBT OF $10 TRILLION AND GIVE US TAX BREAKS????????????????????

How can we afford more war? Remember McCain's little foreign policy statement/song????????????????????????????????????

BOMB………..BOMB…………………….BOMB IRAN. HOW WILL WE PAY FOR ANOTHER WAR?

susie   July 22nd, 2008 2:26 pm ET

When is Obama going to keep his promise and debate McCain?

SS   July 22nd, 2008 2:26 pm ET

McCain's remark about the surge and what Obama suggested prior to the war's "success" is a woulda coulda shoulda statement.
The reality is that Obama can suggest ideas, but can only make progress with the present. So until he becomes president, everything else is heresay.
Typical GOP to focus on everything but the present.

Ellie in Aurora, CO   July 22nd, 2008 2:26 pm ET

He has such a great grasp of the world situation. Thank goodness!! We sooooo need a smart president and someone who can say more than surge, surge, surge!

Kay   July 22nd, 2008 2:23 pm ET

Is it not really sad, that to this date one cannot establish what we really have gained with this war. With over 4000 American lives lost, and an untold number of innocent Iraqi's, not to mention all the woundered Soldiers on both side, we still have some leader's talking about how successful this war is. Can any of these heartless men explain to the widow's and widower's how to put their lives back.

JO-ANN FROM NEW YORK   July 22nd, 2008 2:21 pm ET

OBAMA KEEP ON DOING WHAT YOU ARE DOING….LET THE HATERS HATE…THAT'S WHAT THEY ARE GOOD AT…HATING….

MCCAIN IS GETTING DESPERATE AND SAYING ANYTHING TO GET PEOPLE AGAINST YOU….BUT IF PEOPLE WOULD LISTEN INSTEAD OF JUDGING, THEY CAN SEE THE GAMES HIS CAMPAIGN IS PLAYING…

OBAMA JUST CONTINUE TO USE YOUR EXCELLENT JUDGEMENT AND GOD BLESS YOU….

Sammy   July 22nd, 2008 2:21 pm ET

First they said we cant leave Iraq because there is too much violence. Now that its better they say we cant leave because it would get bad again. Based on those two arguments there will never be a time to leave.

When all is said and done everyone was told over and over again that we would only be there so long as Iraq wants us there. And now that they dont Bush and McCain are scrambling about what to do.

Sammy   July 22nd, 2008 2:18 pm ET

Did I hear somebody say that the Dems allowed our enemies in Vietnam to win and now they want the same enemies in Iraq to win? How did Vietnam become our enemy? People should be schooled in our history. This sense that we have to fight to make our point is archaic and dangerous! So for all of you unschooled war mongers who believe that being involved in a war for war's sake is a noble thing, make a push to get Bush to serve a third term and let him name McCain as his Secretary of War. Then you'll be very happy: we'll have the very thing you crave.

Jill American   July 22nd, 2008 2:17 pm ET

So Hillary was right … hmmmmm.

Obama/Hagel .. no way … Hagel is anti-choice and if Obama picks him it will alienate even more women! Women do make up 51% of the US population.

Shannon   July 22nd, 2008 2:12 pm ET

I think it is time we start bringing our troops home, and shifting the billions of dollars we are using to help Iraq, back to our country so we can help ourselves.

George   July 22nd, 2008 2:11 pm ET

As a father od a Marine that was part of the surge, I take issue with Obama not relaizing or admitting that the surge worked. He insults everyone in uniform suggesting that his plan may have worked. If I had only picked the right numers on Sat, I would have won 6 million dollars. Please Obama, grow up and admit that the surge worked. It is ok we all know it did. Be a man turn loose of the left for one minute and say "The Surge Worked" if you can. How sad that you can't realize the sacrifice these people made to make sure you can travel there without fear.

NOBAMA is a NOVELTY being used by the left. How sad……

Sandy   July 22nd, 2008 2:10 pm ET

We cannot have our soldiers living there forever just to make sure things go smoothly at some point they need to stand on the own.

Phil Newton Murphy, Oregon   July 22nd, 2008 2:07 pm ET

He's right.

He was right about getting in (shoudn't have) and right about getting out (should, with great deliberation and care.)

He's just right.

Gimme A Break   July 22nd, 2008 2:05 pm ET

McCain and the conservatives always say we are winning like it is a game. Games have definite beginnings and endings. What are the goals, and definitions that amount to a win? These conservatives are just giving the Iraqis a blank check and all the time they want. Aren't the conservatives the ones that oppose welfare, big government, and entitlements? I guess Iraq doesnt count.

Mr. Obama, shift the focus to where it should have ONLY been Afghanistan. That is a legit war.

Obama '08. Finally bring some respect back to our nation.

Michael   July 22nd, 2008 2:04 pm ET

Obama would show what kind of man he is if he simply said "John McCain was right–the surge was right–and I (the great redeemer of mankind if you listen to MSNBC) was wrong." That kind of modesty and truth is simply not in him or his supporters.

Fed up with the lies   July 22nd, 2008 2:03 pm ET

Lisa July 22nd, 2008 12:14 pm ET

If you're going to bring them home, bring them home. All talk and no substance.
______________________________________

Uh, Lisa…there has to be an election before President Obama can bring the troops home. You McCain types keep forgetting that no Senator can start the withdrawal. As soon as President Obama takes office, the talk will turn to action and you will feel like a fool.

W.   July 22nd, 2008 2:03 pm ET

How does one go about "securing" an "earned victory?" Either an earned victory is secure, or it is not secure, earned, or a victory.
Sound and fury, stuff and nonsense from another Rebublican Tucker..

Jason   July 22nd, 2008 2:03 pm ET

Isn't this what the dems have been saying for oh 3-4 years. Its up to the Iraqis to decide what to do with their own country. The "great divider" Bush clearly doesn't understand English too well.

Obama has a plan, rather than McScam who will stay the course for 50-100 years. Win what? What is the United States trying to win now?? There has never been a plan for victory offered by Bush or any Republican't

In my eyes, the U.S. has given Iraq everything Bush promised. 1: Get Rid of Saddam (check) 2: Thrust our twisted version of democracy down your throat (check) 3: Free (well U.S. tax payer funded elections) ((check)) 4: Bush's version of Iraq's constitution (check) 5: New Schools, New Infrastructure, Billions of dollars that SHOULD have rebuilt America (check)

I am sick of anyone who continues to support McCain or Bush.. Where are the WMD's Bush promised?? HE LIED and should have already been impeached… That Lie led to 4000+ dead. What did Clinton's lie about oral secks lead to?? Zero deaths and he was impeached for lying about oral secks.. I guess in the Conservative mind oral secks and lying about it is worse than 4000+dead over a lie about WMD's!! If McCain is elected president I firmly believe he will start WW3.. He has a lot of anger left over from his POW days and will unleash it on Iran!!

If you want more war and more of the same. Elect McCain.

Nom Deplume   July 22nd, 2008 2:03 pm ET

Seriously liberals, when Obama is president, and doesn't pull troops out on his timeline, but discovers some new, important reason not to, are you going to hold his feet to the fire??? America wants to know.

Because if he doesn't pull out, and you don't call him on it, I predict that the backlash will be awful, and I predict a lot of libs being spit upon or kicked to the curb (figuratively and literally). Think Bill and Hill had it rough when they backpedaled on their centrism after taking office? That will be a tea party compared to what awaits Obama if he doesn't deliver the pullout.

And I hope his appeasement efforts are successful for your sakes. Lord help you if another 9/11 happens. Best stay indoors. I have long predicted that if such an event occurs, folks won't be lynching just muslims but liberals as well. Not wishing, just saying.

Fed up with the lies   July 22nd, 2008 1:59 pm ET

Thank God Sen. Obama isn't buying in to the surge mentality and is still planning on getting us the heck out of Iraq. Pulling out of Iraq months ago would not have been a defeat for the U.S. As a matter of fact, the established goal was met the day the Iraqui Dictator Hussein was hanged.

What would have happened was that about a thousand more troops would be alive today.

Unfortunately, Sen. McCain still doesn't understand that other factors helped lower the attacks. In fact his surge wouldn't be successful until absolutely no attacks occur. And that just isn't going to happen.

Obama '08

onaje   July 22nd, 2008 1:59 pm ET

Just like "why we went to war" is a thing of the past, so is the idea that Obama didn't support the surge. The issue today is what to do next and I think Obama is dead on by saying that Iraqi stability is in the hands of the Iraqi people.

The President doesn't take orders from generals, the President sets the agenda while listening to what's going happening on the ground.

M.S. Indiana   July 22nd, 2008 1:59 pm ET

ANGIE, So why are we fighting in Iraq and not in Afghanistan ?? and what about all those countries harboring terrorists ?? oh wait they don't have any oil for us to exploid

CP   July 22nd, 2008 1:58 pm ET

@ Lisa

You're obviously all talk and no original thought. How can Obama bring them home if he is not President yet? Just a question.

Anthony   July 22nd, 2008 1:58 pm ET

I look at this and say WOW finally a person after 8 years who has a brain. Who looks at situations for what they are rather then what they could be. The man has spoken to Iraq's Prime Minister and he said..>He wants us gone. So for Bush and McCain to be worrying about the oil and to keep us there is a little out of hand. I see it like this, if you voted for Bush then you have NO RIGHT to complain about Gas Prices, Our Economy, or The War because you supported this idiot. I did not. I think Obama is honestly a YOUNGER better Candidate. Times have changed and its definitely time for a change. I am not a Republican nor Democrat, I'm an Independant who has the right to be my own person rather then be marked by one of these two parties but in all honesty its time we Get a Democrat in Office to take the Torch out of Bush's hand whose other hand is no where but on his money. Its time we WAKE UP AMERICA and See that skin color or religiion does not matter. We are one as a nation and need to see this for what it is. An eye opener for you GOP's who have honestly lost your minds and go on to rants about nothing sort of like McCain right now who looks like an idiot because the Leader of Iraq wants us gone . And the surge didn't work. It was supposed to be over by now and the Iraqi's were supposed to be running their country but is it like that ….NO…so therefore your plan didn't work.. Another Faulty Lie filled plan by the Bush Administration. I hope they arrest his a22 for lying under oath as a president about WMD's which is way more dangerous then a Blow job

William, from Cali   July 22nd, 2008 1:57 pm ET

The only thing that we, can be sure of in this World; is that situations will change. And with that change, our "policies" have to adjust to that change. The 'future predictors" are in limited supply; and the "critics from hindsight", are at the highest premium.

Uchenna in MD   July 22nd, 2008 1:57 pm ET

To all warmongers in support of McCain: Trace your family tree back to Adam (for the Christians) or to evolution and count the number of people in it. I bet they are less than 1000. 4200 people have died unnecessarily in Iraq for crying out loud! Vote for Peace!!!

Republican for Barack Hussein Obama.

ron   July 22nd, 2008 1:56 pm ET

what does McCain mean by winning the war in Iraq. We have the rights to the oil wells .Daddy Bush can sleep at night W hanged he arch rival.

The Surge   July 22nd, 2008 1:55 pm ET

The Surge is a "TACTIC", Obama is talking about a comprehensive Iraq "STRAGEDY". As an ex military man McCain should understand the difference. Touting that "the surge worked!" is like saying " We threw a great punch " when someone else is saying we shouldn't be fighting, lets stop. McCain should say "the surge worked..so we can come home " THAT would be a stagedy or conversely he could say "the surge worked, so we should stay longer" Just saying 'the surged worked'…whether you agree the reduction in violence is due entirely to the surge or not.. is not a saying anything about what we are doing invading another country.

What is winning in Iraq anyway? Is it a reduction in violence, an independent, self governed Iraq, an Iraq not able to threaten its neighbors? Or is it an Iraq with oil controlled by US companies, an Iraq with 50 US bases, an Iraq with a US puppet government?

If it is the former, we've won. Lets leave. We had such an Iraq when Saddam was in power and the thousands of US and hundreds of thousands of Iraqic dead does not justify the invasion. If it the latter…then you make your own call….but I don't think the cost is justified even then.

Bill from ALabama   July 22nd, 2008 1:54 pm ET

Obama simply can't amit he was wrong about the surge! He can't admit that America's involvement in Iraq brought about a new Democracy in the Middle-East. He can't admit his judgement may not be all that great after all !!!!

Obama 08: white, 60 year old woman   July 22nd, 2008 1:54 pm ET

I am looking forward to hearing from Senators Reed and Hagel when they get home. They certainly seemed totally in agreement with Obama at his press conference in Jordan.

McCain has two ads on the internet on how the media is in love with Obama. Perhaps they should be explaining WHY THAT IS OBAMA'S fault. To use this as a reason for not supporting Obama is pathetic.

Since his whining McCain is getting equal coverage. From what I have seen this will only help Obama.

Messiah complex   July 22nd, 2008 1:53 pm ET

Obama… the man of the future… playing the what if game.

Obama is always going back instead of forward.

What if 9/11 never happened? Where would WE be now. We don't know THAT either.

Uncle Sam   July 22nd, 2008 1:53 pm ET

Barack Obama has made a foreign policy blunder on his trip to the Middle East, proclaiming that he wanted to "make it absolutely clear that Israel is a friend of Israel's."

This type of mental lapse could indicate a more serious underlying problem for the freshman senator.
That he doesn't know what the heck he is talking about.

Last Honest Man   July 22nd, 2008 1:52 pm ET

This is an incredibly dangerous person.

REG in AZ   July 22nd, 2008 1:52 pm ET

Current results seem to support what Obama says with there being little doubt that Iraq's security and progress is in the hands of the Iraqis, since the over throw of Saddam it has really always been that way. More than the surge, what the Iraqis have done to stop the fighting between Iraqis and in settling some of the differences between factions within the government is what is really responsible for the current progress. It is time to take American politics and American troops out of the picture.

perfect   July 22nd, 2008 1:52 pm ET

Obama, now trying to take credit for the success of the surge.

He opposed it, it worked, and now he wants to claim credit for it.

Of course the Iraquis will ultimately have to step up to the plate… we need Obama to tell us the obvious.

Tejano   July 22nd, 2008 1:52 pm ET

Let us not forget that we are electing a President not American Idol. The President is the leader of our Nation not a puppet of the International community. Don't put your country at risk. Vote for the one True American in this Race. John S. McCain, Death before dishonor. Semper Fi.

An American Whiner   July 22nd, 2008 1:51 pm ET

What the GOP is not telling you is that the violence was not quelled by the surge. THE VIOLENCE WAS QUELLED A A COMBINATION OF SEVERAL KEY OCCURENCES:

A shift in allegiances among the Sunni tribal leaders, as well as the decision of the Sadr militias to stand down, Iraq military forces growing in power and quelling violence, and finally the surge.

IF THERE WERE NO EFFECTS BUT THE SURGE, THERE WOULD STILL BE WIDESPREAD VIOLENCE THERE.

a southern bell for OBAMA   July 22nd, 2008 1:51 pm ET

OUR NEW PREZ. ROCKS.

IT'S TOO MUCH, SMART, HONEST & GOOD LOOKING.

AND HE LOVES US. HOW SWEET IS THAT???

Barack O'Moron   July 22nd, 2008 1:50 pm ET

The very fact that Obama can be in Iraq mouthing off is because of the surge! What a moron!

David from Ohio   July 22nd, 2008 1:49 pm ET

There's no one with and R after their name at the VP level that doesn't make me shudder. No, let's not "cut and run" (that's the latest slogan right?), let's stay there forever and ever. The problem with Iraq, as with the economy and ever other issue in America today, is that the conservatives, with their black and white world view, have been given the opportunity to govern. They've failed miserably and their only refuge is to attack anyone that offers a solution that's different from their stilted worldview. Newsflash–the conservative movement, as at the beginning of power in 1980, is intellectually and morally bankrupt. So go ahead and get on with the "The Democrats lost Iraq" myth you'll perpetuate for the next 25 years.

Ms. RDS   July 22nd, 2008 1:49 pm ET

Did the republicans send out a memo that says to all surrogates…."No matter what the topic is just make sure to mention the surge at least 10…make that 11 just to be safe."

Sheople yes, people no so much.   July 22nd, 2008 1:49 pm ET

The false prophet pretends to be the Messiah, once again.

The sheep will follow.

The people can see through the media hype.

Demagogue   July 22nd, 2008 1:48 pm ET

The surge- that Obama was against- WORKED.

Now the troops can withdraw on a careful timetable.

Malaki can be on board because things are now improved.

Obama is trying to take credit for a plan that he criticized but that has worked.

How sleazy and dirty is Obama?

AJ.Hnakel   July 22nd, 2008 1:47 pm ET

PLEASE PLEASE don't take our Govenor!!

A NATION OF WHINERS for OBAMA   July 22nd, 2008 1:47 pm ET

WHAT AN AWESOME PRESIDENT !!!!!!

WE ARE GOING TO GET BACK IN STEP WITH OUR OBAMA.

Chad, Wisco   July 22nd, 2008 1:46 pm ET

I do not support this war currently, however I am amazed at how many people now claim that they never supported it. Based on the information at the time (that even had Colin Powell wrong) attacking Iraq was the correct thing to do. I challenge everyone to quit complaining about how we never should have been there and take your cause to how we are going to leave. Complaining will not bring back the men and women who lost their lives.

salt of the earth   July 22nd, 2008 1:46 pm ET

It is the surge… and its success, that now permits a withdrawal of troops.

Duh….

Obama is trying to take the credit for the success of a plan that he strongly and wrongly opposed.

HOW arrogant and self-serving and hypocritical is THAT?

@ANGIE (clueless)   July 22nd, 2008 1:45 pm ET

Jindal is one of those once in a life time politician that is so very rare in these days and age. This guy is a genuine genius with a burning desire to be effective. The changes he has managed to make in LA and the accomplishments he has done in 37 years are rare……very very rare. I do believe we are a fortunate country to have someone like Jindal in governement. Jindal is the sort of person who will set a new standard and raise the bar on what effective leadership ought to be, should be and will be!
—————————————————-
Are you clueless? Jindal is a guy who has not held the same office for more than 2 years in a row; he's held a lot of positions, that's for sure, at least 3 times resiging an office to accept a position in another job.

in the 1 year he has been in the office of governor of LA, at least one recall petition was supported because of Jindal's position to double legislators salaries… he also is known for CUTTING public programs, hospitals and clinics.

Did you know he was a HINDU until high school. How does that fit into your Republican mold? His REAL name isn't even "Bobby" — it's Piyush Jindal (FACT)…

It would be a welcome change for people to do some research before exposing their ignorance… but then, it would help if McCain did that, too.

BUSH & McCAIN

DUMB AND DUMBER

BY the WAY… JINDAL is 36 years OLD. I don't know what you think he might have accomplished in, say, the first 10-20 of those years, dear.

TJ Johnson   July 22nd, 2008 1:45 pm ET

My question to you Obama is: If it is Iraq's responsibility to care for itself without the US, why is Afghanistan different? Why should Americans defend Afghanistan but not Iraq???

Bayou Joe   July 22nd, 2008 1:45 pm ET

The future of Iraq is in Iraq's hands… Wow what a revelation… Tell us something we don't already know…. Like where is your money coming from to buy the presidency. With the poor people that allegedly support you and the downtrodden minorities scraping to pay their bills, where is the MONEY coming from. Venture to Guess Overseas
Arab Money… which is illegal. But then what are a few illegalities.

McCain and ( ) for President. Semper Fidelis (Always Faithfull).

jet in memphis   July 22nd, 2008 1:44 pm ET

good job may God bless you and lead our soldiers away from harm's way.

Obama the way to go

@ANGIE (clueless)   July 22nd, 2008 1:44 pm ET

Jindal is one of those once in a life time politician that is so very rare in these days and age. This guy is a genuine genius with a burning desire to be effective. The changes he has managed to make in LA and the accomplishments he has done in 37 years are rare……very very rare. I do believe we are a fortunate country to have someone like Jindal in governement. Jindal is the sort of person who will set a new standard and raise the bar on what effective leadership ought to be, should be and will be!
—————————————————-
Are you clueless? Jindal is a guy who has not held the same office for more than 2 years in a row; he's held a lot of positions, that's for sure, at least 3 times resiging an office to accept a position in another job.

in the 1 year he has been in the office of governor of LA, at least one recall petition was supported because of Jindal's position to double legislators salaries… he also is known for CUTTING public programs, hospitals and clinics.

Did you know he was a HINDU until high school. How does that fit into your Republican mold? His REAL name isn't even "Bobby" — it's Piyush Jindal (FACT)…

It would be a welcome change for people to do some research before exposing their ignorance… but then, it would help if McCain did that, too.

BUSH & McCAIN

DUMB AND DUMBER

Dems Unify & Vote Big   July 22nd, 2008 1:44 pm ET

A fantastic Obama press conference. His tour abroad makes McCain's trips look like a grade school fieldtrip.

Wisconsin   July 22nd, 2008 1:44 pm ET

Obama Bashers:

LOOK IF YOU WANT TO HATE FINE, BUT GIVE SOME FACTS AND TALK ABOUT ISSUES!

REPUBLICAN COWARDS LEAD BY MCWAR NEVER TALK ABOUT ISSUES AND HOW MCWAR IS BETTER USING FACTS!!!!

LIKE LISA:

"All talk and no substance." What are each one of your post then LISA!

LIKE Catty:

Who just now figured out what Obama has been saying for over a YEAR NOW.

I A VOTER am sick of hearing your CRAP McWar!!! Talk about the issues!

Adam   July 22nd, 2008 1:44 pm ET

A big difference between Obama and McCain seems to be where the responsibility gets put. McCain says, "It's all because of the surge. The surge is what made it safer." Obama seems to realize that it goes much further beyond this. "It was also the Iraqis themselves who made it safer." I trust the person who is less egotistical and willing to see that it will take EVERYONE to make Iraq safe, but mainly the Iraqis. It is their country, and if they want it to be a safe and happy place then that is on them.

Sheople for Obama   July 22nd, 2008 1:44 pm ET

Obama opposed the surge.

The surge has worked.

The success of the surge now enables Obama's plan to withdraw, and Malaki's call for American withdrawal.

Without the surge… it would all be just talk…none of it would be possible.

Obama Christian   July 22nd, 2008 1:44 pm ET

I like the phrase someone ahead of me used…"recovering Republican." I am a recovering Republican in Kansas and very worried our country may not recover from the damage of the last 8 years. If McWar gets in I am sure we will not. Either he is stupid, senile, or clueless confirmed by his last "mis-spoken" comment regarding the tensions on the "Iraq/Pakistan boarder." Give me brilliance over experience any day of the week. If we would have stayed with President Carters energy plan from 30 years ago we would not be in the mess we are in today.

Wisconsin   July 22nd, 2008 1:43 pm ET

Obama Bashers:

LOOK IF YOU WANT TO HATE FINE, BUT GIVE SOME FACTS AND TALK ABOUT ISSUES!

REPUBLICAN COWARDS LEAD BY MCWAR NEVER TALK ABOUT ISSUES AND HOW MCWAR IS BETTER USING FACTS!!!!

LIKE LISA:

"All talk and no substance." What are each one of your post then LISA!

LIKE Catty:

Who just now figured out what Obama has been saying for over a YEAR NOW.

I A VOTER am sick of hearing your CRAP McWar!!! Talk about the issues!

David W.   July 22nd, 2008 1:42 pm ET

Obama you twit, the surge caused Sadr to stand down. He didn't just do it on his own. Geez what a knumbskull you are to suggest the Surge didn't have anything to do with reduced violence.

The folk see through you despite the Media's fawning over you. So enjoy the ride, it's over in November.

Messiah complex   July 22nd, 2008 1:42 pm ET

The infallible one has spoken.

His perfection is astounding.

Democracy itself over loyalty to democratic party   July 22nd, 2008 1:41 pm ET

Pompous self-serving windbag

Jason for Obama '08   July 22nd, 2008 1:41 pm ET

It's sad that McCain and the Republicans see their only out as just attacking Obama's points on different issues. McCain wants the American public to belief that the surge, by itself, is what has led to the quelling of violence in Iraq. In fact, the decisions by ordinary Iraqis to turn against the insurgents, Sadr's decision to agree to a cease-fire, semi-political stability, and the surge all worked together to calm things down. The surge, by itself, WOULD NOT have done everything that has been done at this point. The decision of the PEOPLE to turn things around is what has changed everything. They have HOPE!

Al-Maliki agrees with Obama that there should be a working timetable for withdrawel from Iraq. End of story there, no more Bush "translations" that are wrong! McCain wants to occupy Iraq for 100 years, which is what was done in Japan following WWII. Get the policies that are the same age as you out of here McCain!

Obama has always believed Afghanistan should be the focal point of the fight against extremist activities; look where forces have been built up, supplies replenished, and numbers increased in the region. Where is Osama? You mean to tell me Hussein is suppose to make-up for dropping the ball on not catching the person RESPONSIBLE for 9/11? Take the U and H out of BUSH and that'll tell you what you get!

The distraction of the ignorance that got us in Iraq needs to be ended ASAP! Let McCain focus on the countries he remembers, like Checkloslovakia, Burma, the U.S.S.R., and others that haven't been around for 15 years or more. Meanwhile, let Obama focus on the future, improving America's image around the world and bringing us all the hope that we have so desperately needed for a long time now.

Vote Obama!

I had a dream today…. a dream of hope…. a dream of change….
From the Rocky Mountains to the foothills of Georgia….
I had a dream today…. Obama '08/'12

BTHogan   July 22nd, 2008 1:40 pm ET

"The Iraqi people are absolutely responsible for the outcome once we move out. We have given them the fishing pole, the bait, and showed the the best spot to fish at the lake but we cannot stick around and do the fishing for them. We have taught them to fish, it is now time for them to fish without us."

We took their fishing poles and destroyed them, and that was after we'd poisoned the lake.

And that's why the Iraqis must become independent and self-sufficient. We're the worst thing that ever happened to them – we were in the 80s, when we helped Saddam brutalize his people and the region, and we are today. God help them.

McCain & Bush Manipulate / Change "THE RULES"   July 22nd, 2008 1:39 pm ET

In 2004, John McCain said "when the Iraqi's want us to leave, we will"

In May 2007, President Bush said," it is the soveriegn government of Iraq that will determine when US troops are no longer needed in their country".

The two gentlemen are the standard bearers for the Republican party's agenda.

Both the Iraqi Prime minister al Maliki and his 2nd in command have both echo'd Senator Obama's call for our troops to be completely out sometime in 2010. Seems the "naivety" claim touted by McCain about Senator Obama has been revealed as political gobble-de-gook.

McCain and Bush feel politically insulated from the rest of the country's concerns by there being a war in Iraq. They describe failure as US troops leaving Iraq.

This war was started under false pretenses because the Bush administration was floundering politically in 2001. Do the research and see what was being written & reported about George Bush's lack of leadership accumen at that time. He felt he had to do something to protect his chance at a 2nd term.

Similarly, McCain believes the war and fear-mongering about another potential terrorist attack is good for his politcal career. Unfortunately 4200 young Americans have paid for this type of job insurance with their lives.

That's not patriotism. That's not success.

Now that the US-backed, elected Iraqi leadership wants us to leave, let's see what "spin" Bush and McCain come up with to justify continuing our presence there.

DJ, LA, CA   July 22nd, 2008 1:38 pm ET

Yes that is absolutely correct. The future of Iraq should be determined in 16 months solely by the Iraqi's. It is up to them. I'm sick and tired of my tax dollars and $10- $12 B spent every month to pay to Cheney's Haliburton and more windfall profits to the petroleum industry.

McBUSH   July 22nd, 2008 1:37 pm ET

GO BAMA!

GO BAMA!

GO BAMA!

GO BAMA!

GO BAMA!

Lisa   July 22nd, 2008 1:36 pm ET

I don't think Obama has a clue to what he's doing. He looks terrified to be there and can't wait until he gets home. He will say and do whatever it takes to get votes.

Ron democrat turned independent   July 22nd, 2008 1:34 pm ET

sen. obama said he would listend to the commanders on the ground.( as long as it agrees with is vast milatary experience) which i guess general petraes did't do.re troop removal from iraq. he quotes the obvious like it was his personal observation, about having more troops in afgahnistan. we just forced al qeada from iraq so they have to save face by going to afghanistan. if we pull out of iraq to chase them out of afghanistan, whats to stop them from going back to iraq. not the iraqi army they only have confidence and loyalty because they are proped up by us forces. take them away to soon and they will revert to what they were and it will all have been for naught

Rave   July 22nd, 2008 1:34 pm ET

First…. think about what are we getting in return to run their (Iraq's) security, police, army ??? Are we being paid for these services – NOOO. Are we really destroying the terrorist roots – NOOOO….
People like Bush, Cheney, McCain get paid with hefty contracts that suck up our Tax dollars.
Every American by now clearly understands this.
Still, why do some Americans support this McPain's war policy.. cause they have to. Democrats want us out, so Republicans want to stay.
Are you guys crazy?? Look at ourselves. We cant afford to sacrifice our troops and resources for years to come – for some country's security that doesn't even want us there.
Get out and get out as soon as possible. Obama is leading us in the right direction
OBAMA (2008 -16)

Lee-- Dallas, TX   July 22nd, 2008 1:33 pm ET

I’d for one like to thank Barack for what he’s doing overseas. I can’t remember the last time we had so many world leaders and citizens of other nations as anxious as they are now in hearing what one of our premier political figures has to say.

Not to mention when he speaks, he actually knows what he’s talking about and is able to construct constructive and articulate statements. I’ve grown accustomed over the past eight years of people domestically and abroad running from the presence and words of these ‘politicians’. Barack appears to be genuine in his ability to actually want to hear the concerns of these individuals.

It will be amazing or should I say less so, the criticism he will face for being liked by those other than left of center Americans or those disaffected by the last eight years. Who knew being liked around the world would be such a bad thing.

Casey   July 22nd, 2008 1:32 pm ET

Well said, Senator Obama. While you make intelligent statements based on facts, McCain is over here whining about media bias and trying to blame 30 years of no real energy legislation (and by some bizarre logic, high gas prices) on YOU. What a laugh!

Does he REMEMBER where he's been for the past 26 years? IN CONGRESS…

We have BUSH (DUMB) and god forbid we end up with McCain (DUMBER)

morefromLA   July 22nd, 2008 1:31 pm ET

I saw Obama's 45 minute press conference this morning. Presidential is the first word that comes to mind. Intelligence and command are two others. If only Bush were presidential. If only McCain had the command to remember a four part question and answer it intelligently. Republicans should quickly realize that Barack Obama is Karl Rove's good twin. He has taken McCain's supposed large advantage in foreign relations and significantly reduced that advantage not through the dark forces of lies and distortions that play to our fears but through the forces of light exemplified by good judgement and vision that call to our courage. "President Obama:" Get used to it, the man shows he has the right stuff.

Richard   July 22nd, 2008 1:31 pm ET

I am a republican voting for Obama. He is right on Iraq and McCain is wrong. I believe it is Obama who has the better judgement.

Obama /Hagel 08

AJ   July 22nd, 2008 1:30 pm ET

It is ironic that the republicans are saying that McCain is a better Commander in Chief – CIC (and a large percentage of ignorant electorate also says that). Obama's Afghanistan, Iraq, Middle East tour has proved that he will be a better CIC. He has articulated the job of CIC better than McCain has – just saying that you will listen to commanders on the ground is not good enough for the CIC. The CIC has to lay down the overall strategy that is best for the our and Iraq's security (including our and their economic security which is in doldrums) and well being and let the commanders in the field execute (tactical) the overall strategy. If not, you are not a CIC but a subordinate to the generals who are in the field and armed forces!!!!

Francisco in NY   July 22nd, 2008 1:30 pm ET

Why doesn't WhamBama preach this in his church ? Practice this at home buddy and maybe people will take you seriously !!

Corey Gabriel   July 22nd, 2008 1:30 pm ET

Not only has McCain never defined his versions of "victory" or "success" in Iraq for us, but he has failed to give us a geography lesson as to where he thinks the "Iraqi/Pakistani" border is. Old John is getting confused more and more.

Marj,Paso Robles, Cal   July 22nd, 2008 1:29 pm ET

The Messiah has spoken.

17 year old future politician   July 22nd, 2008 1:29 pm ET

Its funny how so many republicans were against the war when Bush was president, and as soon as Obama runs against McCain they all-of-a-sudden support the war. Listen voters, after over 4 years of U.S. Influence the Iraqi government should be able to handle themselves, they are not a bunch of 5 year olds, how can we legitamitly claim to be helping the Iraqi government by ignoring al-maliki's support for withdrawal…this will make us look like dictators and continue to kill our relationship with the countries around us. Republicans, stop bashing Obama on inexperience and the stupid notion that he is all talk, because I have yet to hear any plans McCain has on any of the big issues in America and abroad. We are not idiots, we know it is YOUR canidate that is infact ALL TALK.

Obama/Sebelius 08′

Mark   July 22nd, 2008 1:28 pm ET

There is no better time then now to pull out from the middle east. These people have been fighting for more years then we could even imagine and as we can all see there is nothing we can do to change the issue over there. If we stay were hated if we leave were hated. So lets do the best thing possible leave but leave with an understanding dont come knocking on our door with your issues and try to drag us in to a fight, because next time we wont be so nice.

Janice   July 22nd, 2008 1:27 pm ET

and to add at the time we went to war 90% of the population approved of this. Granted it hasn't turned out how anyone wanted it to and its time to leave but you people need to get off your soapbox and stop acting like you were against it all along. Neither Obama or McCain is what this country needs.

Vote Scooby Doo -

Gregg   July 22nd, 2008 1:26 pm ET

I agree with senator Obama on this one. The Iraqi people have to control their own fate. the longer we do everything for them the longer it will take. A time line is the one thing that we have failed at. We needed a timeline 2yrs ago and should have stood by it. the end result will be the same if we leave today or 10yrs form now. Why am I the only one that can see that? we walk away and if it all falls appart then we strike from a distance. Boots on ground has been proven NOT to be the answer. Did we learn nothing from the Russian's in Afganistan? From the Iraq/Iran conflict? We trained these insurgents to defeat there enimies, which ironically is now us. Obama has my vote as long as Glenn Beck is his running mate!!

Christopher   July 22nd, 2008 1:26 pm ET

From the understanding I've acquired I think the money we're paying Sunni & Shia militia to stand down is working more than the surge, of course having a few thousand troops standing behind those dollars helped a little bit too!

What!!!   July 22nd, 2008 1:26 pm ET

I thought the surge didn't work?!?! So how did the decrease in violence happen?

"But, Obama said, a functioning Iraq will ultimately depend on the capacity of the Iraqi people to unify themselves, get beyond sectarian divisions and set up a government that works for the people."

Just follow our example of treating diversity in the US. That will work.

Willow, from Iowa   July 22nd, 2008 1:25 pm ET

Obama is right. The only way we could guarantee that their country would be Democratic is to stay another 100 years. Its ultimately up to the people in Iraq to make their own destiny. Its a Civil War and we need to get out of it and let them figure it out amongst themselves. We've given them the tools, now they need to do it.

McCain keeps saying that without the surge, Obama couldn't even safely go there. If we had done what Obama wanted all along, we wouldn't even have needed the surge. Which is just another way of saying escalation.

Michelle   July 22nd, 2008 1:24 pm ET

Response to comment about Obama "looking presidential":

Hello! An ACTOR can LOOK presidential. Maybe that's all Obama is.

And do you know that Obama is staging fake interviews? Journalist
Andrea Mitchell complained about it on Chris Matthews's show.

enlightened voter   July 22nd, 2008 1:24 pm ET

I know what would have happened with that plan, NOTHING! It just shows he was wrong along with other Dems and it would absolutely make them burn to have admit something GWB did right. This guy's arrogance is more than Bill Clinton ever dreamed. He is totally a hack and empty suit. He was supposed to be better than Hillary????

Gary of El Centro, Ca   July 22nd, 2008 1:23 pm ET

What a pleasure it is to listen to Obama discuss world affairs in a thoughtful and intelligent way. What a contrast to the chest thumping cowboy mentality we have seen from the Bush administration and now the McCain campaign.

JD   July 22nd, 2008 1:21 pm ET

O'bummer was against the surge before he was for the surge before he was against the surge!

Janice   July 22nd, 2008 1:20 pm ET

I just have to say that to all the idiots who think Obama voted against going to war with Iraq – Hello he wasn't even a senator when this whole thing started so he did not have a vote. He might of had an opinion but not a vote.

JD   July 22nd, 2008 1:20 pm ET

well thank you Captain Obvious.

Change We Can't Possibly Believe In   July 22nd, 2008 1:20 pm ET

Apparently Sen. Obama now supports the surge and would have us believe that he always has. He also now would have us believe that he always felt the war in Iraq was winnable.

What does he take us for?

tony   July 22nd, 2008 1:18 pm ET

I meant the war on terror in my post.

bill for barack   July 22nd, 2008 1:17 pm ET

There must be only a handful of deluded stooges around the world who do NOT realize the truth of this. Unfortunately one is in the White House and the other aspires to be.

Wesley   July 22nd, 2008 1:17 pm ET

The surge would have been irrelevant if we had listened to Obama in the first place. This was a war …. INVASION… that should have never occured. We invaded a sovereign nation unprovoked. Sounds to me like the surge was a way of cleaning up an unnecessary mess.

OBAMA was correct all along.

Anonymous   July 22nd, 2008 1:16 pm ET

The surge would have been irrelevant if we had listened to Obama in the first place. This was a war …. INVASION… that should have never occured. We invaded a sovereign nation unprovoked. Sounds to me like the surge was a way of cleaning up an unnecessary mess.

OBAMA was correct all along.

FactCheck   July 22nd, 2008 1:16 pm ET

> HA! Very well, Obama, now, you need to change your debate and
> give the credit to the tireless efforts of our military and diplomats who >have crafted a situation on the ground that you and the media have
> tried so hard to hide.
> The man is clueless.

Talk about clueless… try looking up "Al-Sadr" and "cease fire" and tell me again about how it's all because of the surge. Next time, try doing a little homework before you spout off.

Scott Brown Palm Bay Florida   July 22nd, 2008 1:16 pm ET

McHussian strikes again! Why not offer the terrorists a happy meal and some of your freshly made kool aid that all of your followers drink-it works on them. The CHOSEN ONE delivers such good speeches and when you take the teleprompter away there is nothing left.

tony   July 22nd, 2008 1:15 pm ET

Can anyone define what success in Iraq is? According to McCain , we have already succeeded in Iraq. Succeeded in what? If we have already succeeded, can we pull our troops from Iraq and concentrate on the real war of terror against Al Qaeda in Afghanistan?

Michael "C" Lorton, Virginia   July 22nd, 2008 1:14 pm ET

Spoken like a "true" President. There are no winners in a war; it all boils down to who is left……..and I agree……the Iraqis need to take control of their country and their lives.

JimBlanco   July 22nd, 2008 1:14 pm ET

I find it fascinating that while Democrats attempt to portray themselves as highly educated do-gooders, they are almost exclusively the first to resort to childish name calling and most often offer the most ignorant blog comments possible. Just an observation…

E for Obama   July 22nd, 2008 1:14 pm ET

What surge policy? The surge is over!!! Is that McCain's argument, hypethicals. Well, here is a hypathetical, if Obama was president in 2000 we would not have invaded Iraq AND we would be succeeding in Afhgan where the terrorists are!

Wake up people!!!

FactCheck   July 22nd, 2008 1:14 pm ET

Of the $341 MILLION DOLLARS A DAY that the US is wasting in Iraq, how much of it comes from the Iraq's own economy? Nada! This, despite the fact that the Iraqi economy has doubled over the last year. How dumb are the McCain supporters to not see through this?

Mikey   July 22nd, 2008 1:14 pm ET

McCain campaign: "……. rather than securing the victory our troops have earned and the surge has made possible,"

Is this the same campaign that just criticized Obama for suggesting that if the surge has been successful, it would allow us to exit sooner? Didn't they say it was as bad a Bush's "Mission Accomplished" proclamation? Are they now making the same proclamation less than a week later? How stupid are these people?

What are the odds that we will end up with a stable western friendly government in Iraq? Still very slim at best, right? How about getting Bin Laden? How about being welcomed as liberators? Less of a failure is still a failure! Thank you GWB and JSM.

Also, they said that if we followed Obama's advice, we would have "lost" the war. What a crock. Had we followed Obama's advice, we would have never gone in at all and would have saved over 4,000 American lives, who knows how many Iraqi lives, and hundreds of billions of dollars. Plus we would have been able to focus on terrorism and avoided making hundreds of thousands more enemies through the Muslim world.

Perhaps McCain wants to snatch victory from the jaws of defeat in Viet Nam, too. Then on to free Czechoslovakia from Soviet control. Hope he doesn't send troops to patrol the border between Australia and Iran.

Janet   July 22nd, 2008 1:13 pm ET

Wake up CNN your idiotic threads highlighting John McSames attacks are getting monotonous. Also your racist headline "Barack's presidency could be bad for race relations" is race baiting" Stop it! And these lopsided polls that you cite as valid are also bogus. Are you polling minorites? NO ! So they are only based on a few whites who are predominately conservative. This is not a valid estimate of what all of the population thinks. It's just CNN's. Just because you have a few minorites as newscasters doesn't make your news fair and balanced.

FLA   July 22nd, 2008 1:12 pm ET

You Obama supporters are voting for a farce. He can't back up what he says now with what he has said in the past. He is only saying what you WANT to hear.

Will you people wake up…HE WILL NOT bring the troops HOME. He will not be able to once the commanders tell him it is not in the interest of our country to leave prematurely. He has already backed off of his knee jerk reaction to the "Pull them out now" approach.

Puppet for Pelosi and Reid 08!!!

Walter, Long Beach   July 22nd, 2008 1:11 pm ET

How much longer is the press going to simply repeat John McCain's lies without pointing out that they are lies?

Sean   July 22nd, 2008 1:08 pm ET

So Obama offers reasoned stances backed by examples and evidence, while McCain offers non-stop, rhetorical shrieking about how Obama wants to surrender without ever actually explaining how that point makes any logical sense, or how McCain would define the "victory" he claims that only he wants.

Yeah – I'll go with Obama, thanks.

Obama Supporter 2   July 22nd, 2008 1:08 pm ET

Slider,

If Obama is clueless what does that make McCain?????

Kris from AZ   July 22nd, 2008 1:08 pm ET

It is true. Wethere is be now or later. Iraqis determine their future. We won the war. Now they have to make peace with them selves.

NoMcSame   July 22nd, 2008 1:07 pm ET

McSames cry of victory in the surge is equal to Bush and his mission accomplished statement. No war no need for a surge. No war and Iran would still be in check. No date set for exit means that thwy will keep us there for 100yrs. The peple of Iraq must learn to fight for themselves. They were good at it before so they can clean up their own house better than we can.
Obama08

Nia Hussein- Phoenix, AZ   July 22nd, 2008 1:06 pm ET

What say you Mr McKeatingFive?! What exactly is your specefic plan for our troops? Since you want to continue our stay over there what is your specific pan while we are there?!

Chris   July 22nd, 2008 1:06 pm ET

POLITIC SOLUTIONS REQUIRES STABILITY. STABILITY REQUIRES SECURITY. SECURITY REQUIRES LAW AND ORDER VIA TROOPS. Out of the hundreds of advisor schooling Obama on the basics of foreign engagements, you would think someone would have learned the basics already…….I guess they're too busy planning the next photo op and staged show to bother with specifics. Scary notion folks…..vote Mccain Jindal in November and not role the dice on this one. The stakes are too high!

SOUTHERN HOTTIE   July 22nd, 2008 1:04 pm ET

For ARB,

you're a bitter, little person.
go away.
and take McCain with you.

Cynthia   July 22nd, 2008 1:04 pm ET

And that is where it should be. The money being spent in Iraq could be better used in other places – especially here in the U.S.

Dave, Illinois   July 22nd, 2008 1:04 pm ET

How freakin gullable can you Obamites get? Good lord, Obama is basically saying that the success accomplished in Iraq the last year would have happened without the Surge. What a pile. Obama simply cannot lower his over-inflated ego to admit he is wrong.

Chris   July 22nd, 2008 1:02 pm ET

OMG…the most ultra liberal magazine the NY Times is refusing to publish Mccain's OP ED unless he meets their editing demands and change his positions on Iraq? What a revelation…..NOT!

Hmmmm, wasn't it also the NY Times that published a story claiming Mccain cheated on his wife based on a feeling some unnamed anonymous staffer had claimed? Oh NY Times, what a tangle web we weaved once we decide to deceive the public in pushing our own agenda! Once again, the NY Times stepped up to prove that journalism as lowered the bar of integrity and standards even lower then many had thought possible.

Jane, MD   July 22nd, 2008 1:01 pm ET

Can one of you Republicans tell me how you intend to pay for the continued occupation of Iraq?
In case you have been in a coma, AMERICA IS ON SALE, and the rest of the world, including those from oil rich countries, are buying America, real fast. Wake up you slumbering Republicans.

Brian   July 22nd, 2008 1:01 pm ET

Even from reading all the previous comments for both sides….Obama is still the obvious choice. As long as the Republican party keeps bringing up non-issues like religion and trying to take away everyones God-given right to marry – even if they are the same sex – the party is not going to succeed. Obama 08!!!

Lisa   July 22nd, 2008 1:01 pm ET

Unless McCain can give me a valid reason why they decided to ignore Bin Laden and instead focus on Iraq…he can shut his pie hole.

And Nate…our troops should not be dying trying to stabilize Iraq. Whose fault is it that they are? Not Obama's fault…thats for dang sure.

DC   July 22nd, 2008 12:59 pm ET

Lisa July 22nd, 2008 12:14 pm ET

If you're going to bring them home, bring them home. All talk and no substance.
______________________________________________________

Lisa, he cant bring them home he is still a senator and cant do much…if he is president he will do that…..why do you act so dumb???

AREYOUFORREAL   July 22nd, 2008 12:59 pm ET

If BO make you sick. Take two asprins and get off the blog.

DD, New York   July 22nd, 2008 12:59 pm ET

P.S. And he's got 300 advisors???!!!! 300???!!!

DD, New York   July 22nd, 2008 12:57 pm ET

Is it me, or is Sen. Obama a bit presumptious that he WILL be our next president? Is it arrogance? Or is it delusional? I find all of his aura to be a bit scary.

Frank, Missouri   July 22nd, 2008 12:56 pm ET

Absolutely right !

Dave   July 22nd, 2008 12:56 pm ET

Nate, The Iraqi government is asking for us to pull out. They don't want us there or need us there.
The GOP is measuring the success of the troop surge by the drop in monthly deaths of American soldiers. That is such a joke.
There are still terrorist attacks in Iraq, they haven't dwindled in numbers. There are still various militant factions fighting for control of different areas, and this hasn't reduced either. The only reason less US troops are dying is because the US used the extra troops to bunker themselves in defensive positions. The people dying now are the civilians and the Iraqi police. The surge hasn't reduced the violence or death, just redirected it.
US troops are still dying there. We are still sinking this country deeper and deeper in debt for a lie brought to us by the GOP. Our economy is in shambles, and we are loosing ground in the war we should have been focusing on in the first place. The generals are asking for more troops, but Bush is ignoring them and committing everything to Iraq.
Bush and the GOP have done nothing but lie to us while they tanked our economy and fought the wrong war. McCain wants to continue this. Obama actually tells the truth about the surge, the situation, and what the Iraqi's want. He's willing to do what needs to be done.

And if you want to find a flip-flopper. Take Lieberman, McCain and his bunch. They attack Obama's plan for Iraq while it mirrors what the Iraqis want. They attack Obama's energy plan, but praise Picken's plan even though Pickens says stop drilling and start finding alternatives.

At least Obama is willing to talk to us like adults instead of slinging mud and giving us no substance like McCain.

JimB   July 22nd, 2008 12:55 pm ET

It seems some republican politicians would-be politicians are always quick to take not just jumps, but flying leaps, at even the smallest glint of even a suggestion that any of their strategies have worked. Any nit-wit knows that if you continue to put enough war fighters on the ground, eventually you will begin to suppress the enemy. And even any nit-wit knows that doing so is not free. It has a cost, and that is not just measured in dollars.

America, when are we going to stop electing officials who push their personal agendas, while convincing many Americans they are representing ours? When are we going to elect a president who listens to us, and who acts in accordance to what the majority of Americans want?

Most of don't want to send more troops to Iraq. Most of us don't want to waste more billions on an area of the world where practically every inhabitant hates us. Most of us want out of this situation. Most of us want our troops home. We want jobs, health insurance, education…a future with our families here, not over there dying in Iraq.

ANGIE   July 22nd, 2008 12:54 pm ET

LISA he has to be elected first do you have any common sense????

White/female/age 55/Texan   July 22nd, 2008 12:52 pm ET

Slider – you are the one who is clueless.

"I am pleased that as a consequence of great effort by our troops — but also as a consequence of a shift in allegiances among the Sunni tribal leaders, as well as the decision of the Sadr militias to stand down — that we've seen a quelling of violence," he said.

R.I.F.   July 22nd, 2008 12:48 pm ET

It's funny because the guys who have been embedded in Iraq for years have said numerous times that it was a lot more than the "surge" tharr has brought down viloence.

DJ in TX   July 22nd, 2008 12:47 pm ET

I still say, if the surge so called "worked", why can't our troops begin to come home. It wasn't just the surge. The US IS PAYING the Sunnis to fight Al Quaida. Obama is right, Al Sadr has worked something out with the Iraqi government to stand down and we still have 150K tropps there (more than the initial 130K that went).

But what has it gotten us? What benefit has it brough to the US?

– Iraq wants us gone
– We are pretty much doing this alone, no real coalition (only 4K British troops)
– Not one dime from the now 30 – 40 billion in Iraq's oil reserves
– gas prices still going through the roof
– 4200 American servicemembers dead
– untold amounts of Iraqis dead
– no WMD's found
– no ties to 9-11
– Iraq's government getting friendly with Iran

What have we "succeeded" in (according to McCain).

– The Taliban is strong and resurgent
– Osama bin Laden still alive (or least not confirmed dead)
– Pakistan refusing to allow us to use their land to track Osama

Sure we've succeeded all right. Just please explain what.

BTW – I'm a Desert Storm veteran.

malik   July 22nd, 2008 12:47 pm ET

Since I belong to that region I know what Obama is talking about, he is right when he said he will go against Al-Qaeda in Pakistan if Pakistani Govt. is not cooperating with us, Pakistan is the biggest challenge for next administration. In Pakistani Al-Qaeda plans all there killings either against our troops or innocent civilians in Pakistan and Afghanistan, they still roam freely on north western cities of Pakistan and kills innocents people on daily basis and here we are stuck in a country which has nothing to do with September Attack. The only way to do it is not just pull out from Iraq and increase our troop level in Afghanistan but to rebuild the country bottom up and make sure the funding which is our tax payer's money goes to the projects not in the pockets of corrupt Govt. of President Karzai.

Silence Dogood   July 22nd, 2008 12:47 pm ET

Generic speech from a generic politician:
" I think all the parties involved might or might not have had an effect, and some change stategy in the future would be a good course and it is in the hands of the people."

al   July 22nd, 2008 12:46 pm ET

***********************************************

NOW, REPUBLICANS WATCH AND LEARN.

THIS IS HOW DIPLOMACY WORKS NOT BY FORCE BUT BY LETTING EVERYBODY INVOLVE CONTRIBUTE TO ATTAIN THE OBJECTIVE.

STOP THE MADNESS. VOTE OBAMA.

Safety & Comfort   July 22nd, 2008 12:46 pm ET

Obama needs to turn the discussion back to the economy. If the war is the talking point of the election Obama will not win.

rw   July 22nd, 2008 12:45 pm ET

I agree… it is just not the surge; Sunnis supporting terrorists started co-operating with US Forces; that dropped a major reduction in violence; Maliki also stepped up Iraqi forces role; cracking on Iranian supplies, Al-Sadr working a peace deal with Maliki etc.. etc. lot of factors, just not the surge!!! McCain tell the 100% truth not part of the truth!!!

Love Huckabee   July 22nd, 2008 12:42 pm ET

See, McCain is a complete idiot. Did you see him on the Today show, he didn't answer the question, talked over her, and blamed Obama for everything. He's losing, and I love it.

Seriously Folks   July 22nd, 2008 12:42 pm ET

Ease up with the CAPS!

Bob Indianapolis, IN   July 22nd, 2008 12:42 pm ET

Why is no one mentioning how much we are paying the Sunnis not to fight?

Frostlanta   July 22nd, 2008 12:41 pm ET

July 22nd, 2008 11:48 am ET

"YEA, THANK YOU. IRAQIS NEED TO TAKE CARE OF IRAQ.

I WANT MY TAX $S GOING TO AMERICANS FIRST. I AM

EVEN WILLING TO PAY MORE TAXES TO REBUILD

MY AMERICA. WE HAD NO BUSINESS GOING INTO

IRAQ IN THE FIRST PLACE & WE HAVE NO BUSINESS

STAYING THERE. LETS REBUILD LOUISIANA"

I completely agree with you Dr. Mimi De la Cruz, It won't be long before CHANGE is here.

Obama 08, 12

Foreign observer   July 22nd, 2008 12:40 pm ET

The money surge made the difference – not the American soldiers surge.

Mark   July 22nd, 2008 12:39 pm ET

"I am pleased that as a consequence of great effort by our troops — but also as a consequence of a shift in allegiances among the Sunni tribal leaders, as well as the decision of the Sadr militias to stand down — that we've seen a quelling of violence," he said. (Barack Obama)

This guy needs to get a clue.
Obama needs to be honest wtih himself and the american people. The Sadr militias did not stand down because of kumbya diplomacy, they were defeated and surrendered.

And this guy wants to be our president?

We are screwed to say the least.

Foreign observer   July 22nd, 2008 12:37 pm ET

Not the few thousand of American "surge" soldiers made the difference. Be honest – 100 000 Sunni fighters on American pay role made the difference !!! Stop these payments and the soldiers will face again violence.

Pater servius, Ft. Myers   July 22nd, 2008 12:35 pm ET

Urrh. Mr. Obama–perhaps you should be a little more expansive in your simple explanations:

Do you think the Sadr militia's are STANDING DOWN because they just "decided to"? When in fact most likely cause was that they were running out of hiding places–and they were nearing the point of being exterminated by surge military forces? Or perhaps because Sadr was having supply-chain problems getting men and weapons across the border from Iran and Syria because routes were shut down by coalition and Iraqi forces?

I know little about foreign policy—but I know BS when I hear it.

no no no!   July 22nd, 2008 12:35 pm ET

Catty July 22nd, 2008 11:50 am ET

For all the democrats viewing Obama as their savior, Read between the lines. He is NOT bringing the troops home, he is moving them to Afghanistan. No more lives will be saved, and the war will not end.
_____________________________________________________

Catty….if you were to punch me in the face why would i hit the person standing down the street? does that make sense to you ? we should NEVER have been in Iraq, we were only there because of the lies perpetrated by Bush and supported by McCain. if we kept our eyes ON the ball instead of the OIL may be those 4,000 soldiers would still be alive. the USA has the best military in the world and yet we fail to bring justice to the 3,000 who were killed on 911…..but no worries, EXXON got their no bid contract in Iraq, McCain's lobbyist friends must be very happy.

MCCAIN08…idiot

kendall   July 22nd, 2008 12:34 pm ET

I believe and support our troops however I agree that if it weren't for Iraqis participating in the Sons of Iraq program and daughters of Iraq program and the Al-Sadr callig his militias to back down as a paid campaign to Al Sadr to stop shooting at U.S. troops and Al Queada killing innocent Iraqis that made Iraqi men mad has contributed to the reduction, but Political Tactics that state that McCain is the reason when was one of many to support the escalation. That he know how to win wars, by saying the surge worked, General Petraeus is to thatnk because the surge worked, not McCain, give credit where its due.

Mike, Syracuse, NY   July 22nd, 2008 12:34 pm ET

Hey Mel, I served for 22 years. I've earned the right to have an opinion. More than can be said for Obama.

Maggie Muggins From Selwyn   July 22nd, 2008 12:33 pm ET

Can anyone in the U.S. define what a victory is in Iraq if so help McCain out with this poser as he is completely asea on this issue.

Elect McCain he is the only chance for America to make George Bush look like a genius.

Kathryn Irby - Metairie, LA   July 22nd, 2008 12:33 pm ET

As usual, Obama is correct in saying this. The Iraqis have to learn to defend themselves sooner or later, and sooner would be more ideal.

Steve (Independent)   July 22nd, 2008 12:33 pm ET

While I am an Independed (Ex-Republican), I am leaning very heavily towards Obama.

I think the Republicans need to wake up and smell the coffee…

Steve USN (Ret) Vietnam Vet.

Susan   July 22nd, 2008 12:32 pm ET

better than being someplace we are not wanted. McLame just does not get it. They have nothing to add to the conversation other than their old tired rhetoric. America is not buying it anmore, Johnny boy. Over 4,100 dead Americans for GBW's and Cheneys illegal war which you want to continue is more than enough! Go home!

Mb   July 22nd, 2008 12:32 pm ET

How wonderful to have someone represent the US in such an articulare and intelligent way. But also the visuals are great. having the 3 of them on stage looking groomed, relaxed, and competent says more than words could ever say in restoring confidence and respect to our country.

Mike, Syracuse, NY   July 22nd, 2008 12:32 pm ET

Why can't Mr. Judgement admit he blew it? The surge worked. If Obama's plan had been followed Iraq would be part of Iran by now. Does anyone really think Maliki would be saying we can leave if violence was still at pre-surge levels? Obama was there 1 day, and now he thinks he knows it all. What a fool!

Just Curious   July 22nd, 2008 12:30 pm ET

Why does CNN have Obama ads on almost every page of its website? If they are going to so strongly champion one candidate over the other, they should change their name from CNN ( Cable News Network.) to OEN ( Obama Election Network) Cable and mainstream news organizations have completely lost all credibility with their open and unapologetic bias in favor of one candidate. The American people have a RIGHT to unbiased journalism, and we are not getting it. The news is no longer news; it is propaganda for the Obama campaign. This is the USA, not some Communist country with the government in control of the media. It is truly tragic.

Jude   July 22nd, 2008 12:30 pm ET

It befounds me why McCain would get all the credit for the "non-violence" in IRAQ when we know that "the surge" wasn't the main reason why violence has slowed. We all know the US government is paying off the sectarians to stop violence!

Jamal kansas   July 22nd, 2008 12:30 pm ET

It is funny when you know that Republicans pay bloggers to spew there nonsense agendas like we are listening to Republicans try harder Because we won't Obama wait you already know that Obama 08

AA   July 22nd, 2008 12:28 pm ET

What do you mean sir?

That you see the situation for what it is?

That after talking to the highest commanders in the military and hanging-by-a-thread allies that there is absolutely no other realistic way for your country to get out of the biggest, most poorly planned and corrupt mistake made in the history of your country?

But, but, but, you didn't say that we would win, and, and, you play basketball, and your name is foreign'ish.

Jan, Knoxville, TN   July 22nd, 2008 12:28 pm ET

Isn't Barack just wonderful! I deeply believe he can turn things around for our country and the world.

BR   July 22nd, 2008 12:28 pm ET

Earlier in 2007, the war was lost according to BHO, then Bush enacts the surge strategy and we are winning. Now BHO wants to somehow claim a stake to it. The kool-aid drinking minions of the left are really unintelligent.

NY State of mind   July 22nd, 2008 12:28 pm ET

Slider

I'm in the military and I don't need any thank you from Obama. Him being my President will be thanks enough!!

Brian   July 22nd, 2008 12:26 pm ET

Take a look at this press conference. That's Barack Obama on the ground in the middle east, speaking the truth with Chuck Hagel sitting behind him. Hagel is a prominent, respected Nebraska Republican who, on the verge of retirement, has few remaining political aspirations.

As a result, he has committed himself to standing behind what's RIGHT … not what's politically convenient for the Republican party. And that is ending the war in Iraq… a costly mistake from the beginning.

He knows Obama is right, and is the only politician with the courage to see this madness brought to a resolution.

OBAMA '08!!!

Jamal kansas   July 22nd, 2008 12:26 pm ET

this is true because if the people in iraq would not have agreed to stop fighting us and start fightiong extremist for a FEE of course the troop surge would never have worked

Mike in Columbus   July 22nd, 2008 12:25 pm ET

Catty,

Good point… lets just keep them in Iraq forever… its benefitted us so much so far!!!!!!!

Those kids who want their parents home are just a bunch of cut&run whinners, right?

atypical   July 22nd, 2008 12:24 pm ET

I'm in support of helping the Iraqi people help themselves and that can be achieved by starting plans for withdrawal in the not-to-distant future.

We shouldn't have been there to begin with, at least not for the reasons we were; so it makes it all the more important the manner in which we leave, but leave we must.

Obama 08

Foreign observer   July 22nd, 2008 12:23 pm ET

So Irak has enough money to pay the thousands of Sunni fighters in mid of 2010. Until then US has to pay them. Thats where the surge results came from ! The term "surge" was nice propaganda.

Obamacan   July 22nd, 2008 12:23 pm ET

WOW….
America – We just had an opportunity to listen what a real soon to be president sounds like.

If we take into consideration that according to many, foreign policy is where Obama is supposedly weak, I don’t know what McSame and the Republican party will do when he gets to speak on an area where he’s strong.

McSame will forever regrets challenging this guy to take this trip.

I couldn’t be happier I switched party.

Republican for Obama 08.

Mike, TX   July 22nd, 2008 12:22 pm ET

What Obama cannot admit is that all this progress in Iraq happened because of the surge. The Iraqi government has completed 16 of 18 political objectives set out.

By saying that the future of Iraq is "ultimately in the hands of Iraqis" is just a stupid recognition of the obvious.

Most know that had we followed the Obama plan, R&D (retreat and defeat), Iraq would now be experiencing ethnic violence on a national scale.

Keep up the stupidity Obama.

Roofin Reality, Houston, Tx.   July 22nd, 2008 12:22 pm ET

Still waiting for a majority of the bloggers to give facts and not just say things like "All you Obama supporters make me sick." That's just one example. I'm still looking for facts, just the facts folks.

MMN-Milwaukee WI   July 22nd, 2008 12:21 pm ET

Let the truth be told, if the US stops spending $800,000 a week to bribe the warring factions of Sunis, Shiites, and Sadr militias not to fight each other the Surge will look like a joke. As usual the GOP thinks money or brut force will solve any problem in the world.

Canada   July 22nd, 2008 12:20 pm ET

I love how Barack Obama always considers the BIG PICTURE when analyzing the facts. He gets it. He's Presidential.

Obama – Pickens on the ticket. Just kidding but Pickens has a brilliant short and longterm plan.

Julie, WI   July 22nd, 2008 12:19 pm ET

I don't understand why the so called "nobamas" even listen to what the Senator has to say if they don't like what he stands for. I for one don't get it, if you are that repulsed with Obama then change the darn channel. Why sit and listen? I don't get that analogy!

Amy   July 22nd, 2008 12:18 pm ET

Isn't this what had to happen after the Civil War in the US? AS long as the union troops were present in the south, the south was unable to deal with what had to become their new way of life "getting along". Don't get me wrong it took a very long time to get where the south is today… but maybe we can learn from our history and try to help the Iraqis not repeat the issues we had post civil war in the south.

Eventually, the only people who can solve the problems in Iraq will be Iraq. If the troop surge truly worked by itself then we should be able to leave… so what is McCain and Bush afraid of? I think it is the fact that we have been paying these people to not attack us…. no one reports that when they talk about this surge strategy.

The surge strategy =paying off our enemies nto to fight us… kind of like the mofia days.

Lisa   July 22nd, 2008 12:14 pm ET

If you're going to bring them home, bring them home. All talk and no substance.

a southern bell for OBAMA   July 22nd, 2008 12:14 pm ET

MCBUSH CONTINUES TO SPOUT FOR THE IGNORANT

"WE ARE WINNING", "WE ARE WINNING"

WINNING WHAT??????

WE ARE BORROWING A BILLION DOLLARS PER DAY, FOE THE

IRAQ WAR. HOW DOES THAT MAKE SENSE TO ANYONE OTHER

THAT THE FOLKS THAT ARE MAKING MONEY, NAMELY GEORGE,

DICK, MCCLUELESS & COTHIEFS. WAKE UP AMERICA, THINK !!!!!

Troy, MT   July 22nd, 2008 12:13 pm ET

I want to take the smirk off of McPain's face. He's creepy. The thought of him being in charge with such obvious insecurities, is frightening.

Obama 08

KP   July 22nd, 2008 12:12 pm ET

Obama is a born leader. He is a good listerner and is willing to incorporate all ideas to make a policy or strategy work. He is also willing to admit mistakes and try again. He doesn't exclude anyone who has a valid point to make unlike the leadership we have been forced to endure for the last eight years.

Obama for America and America for Obama!!!

NY State of mind   July 22nd, 2008 12:12 pm ET

Oil prices have fell between 10-14 dollars over the last week

Gas has fell 1-2 cents in same time period!
Oil drop about 8%
Gas less than 1%

Gouging in this country is suppose to be illegal but is being done at all levels

Unemployment on the rise again

More factories moving or closing

Millions without health care

Thousands losing homes monthly

Price of food on the rise

Heating oil over 5 dollars a gal. in NY already

2% of the people in US control 80% of the money

Vote with your heads, not your hearts (party line)
It will take us all to turn the ship around so stop yelling at each other, grab an ore and start rowing. It’s a long way to the shoreline!!!

Obama 08
CNN please post!!

Matt   July 22nd, 2008 12:11 pm ET

Even in a speech about Iraq, Obama disses the troops by making it out to be some kind of coincidence American Forces have succeeded over there.

Yeah, Obama, keep telling yourself we would have failed if Sadr hadn't turned tail and run.

YOU ARE A DISGRACE OBAMA!!

Darlene, NH   July 22nd, 2008 12:11 pm ET

Our next POTUS is speaking excellently. We will win this election and take our country back. We will stop the torture (that may still be going on), and we will put the rogues in jail who violated our Constitution.

Kick the bums to the side and let's move forward in getting our country to be number one in decency and honor.

Obama 08

P.S. McPain is screaming about nothing again. Please hurry up November; I can't wait to send this guy back to the Senate, for good.

John   July 22nd, 2008 12:10 pm ET

ARB, you're statements are illsupported and hate-driven… We really have no use for them in this forum. Kindly stop your blind hatred and take some time to objectively review senator Obama's positions, history and character. I have given Sen. McCain the benefit of doubt and reviewed his policies, read his books and even attended a rally and while I respect him for what he endured for our country during the Vietnam War, I believe his judgment is clouded and ill-suited for the challenges ahead.

Steve   July 22nd, 2008 12:10 pm ET

@Angie: Are you insane? Osama bin Laden is from Saudi Arabia, NOT Iraq. I hope I read your post incorrectly, as it would make me even more sad to think that someone in America is that stupid.

BO is very much on the mark as far as talking of the people of Iraq need to stand up and live with each other. Whether they pick democracy is hinged on their abilities to confront their problems and deal with them in some sort of singular solution.

Saddam was not a good leader, he killed hundreds of thousands of his own people, his family bathed in the blood of the Kurds, and needed to be replaced; However, it was never the job of the US to replace him. We had that opportunity to do that in 1991, and we did not for some reason. Afghanistan IS the correct place that should have been attacked, that is where the 9/11 bombers were trained, and where OBL was being harbored. That is where we should be focusing on, and where we need to 'win' .. If any war can truly be won…

These comments from a 10 year Army veteran that fought in Panama, Iraq/Kuwait, and did one tour in Bosnia. I have seen the 3 mile Road of Death, and can tell you no war is "won", it is simply put on hold till someone else wants to kill us.

Nate   July 22nd, 2008 12:10 pm ET

Obama's policy woudn't give the Iraqis a chance to stablise their country. He wanted to leave them high and dry.

A NATION OF WHINERS for OBAMA   July 22nd, 2008 12:08 pm ET

THE IDIOCY OF THE INVASION HAS BEEN FOLLOWED BY

MORONIC MISMANAGEMENT OF THE ENTIRE IRAQI WAR.

WE NEED A CEO THAT CAN REORGANIZE THE LARGEST

ORGANIZATION ON EARTH. TO BE SURE, MCCLUELESS IS

A FEW NOTCHES BELLOW GEORGE, IF YOU CAN IMAGINE THAT.

soy   July 22nd, 2008 12:07 pm ET

It is logical that if you put enough US troops on the ground in Iraq that violence will reduce to nothing in that nation. That was never the issue with the surge. The issue was we can't continue to be the personal security army for the sovereign nation of Iraq. They need to take responsibility for their security and for the future of their nation. The fact remains that if the reduction in violence is only as a result of us being there and our men and women in uniform being trained and capable. But ultimately we can't remain their indefinitely and the Iraqis need to take responsibility and till they do that no real victory has been achieved. The victory that McCain speaks of is only temporary. It can only be solidified if the Iraqis can keep themselves secure.

James Hussein, SC   July 22nd, 2008 12:06 pm ET

South Park Conservative – The war is lost. What have we won and what can we win? If you don't have an answer, then we lost before we started.

Catty – Obama is no savior! Yes, Senator Obama would like to see troops slated for replacements to Iraq sent to Afghanistan. The folks who are already in Iraq will come home. The ultimate plan is to end both wars and get our American citizens HOME.

Debby, NJ   July 22nd, 2008 12:06 pm ET

OBAMA '08
BARACK THE VOTE !!!

georgia   July 22nd, 2008 12:05 pm ET

Biffington
I agree !!!! It's all they got & McShame Manchurian Candidate has already started !! What a loser !!!! Obama 08 !!!!!!!!

baracomama   July 22nd, 2008 12:04 pm ET

Tell me why we still need troops on the ground?
Why we still need a strong military presence in Iraq ?
I Thought McCain said he won the War !!!!!
Everyone has all gotten on the same page, Idiot Bush, The Iraq Government, The Iraq people, The American People. Even Blackwater has deciced to pull out

But Not Bomb,Bomb, Bomb Bomb McCain

Slider   July 22nd, 2008 12:04 pm ET

Did anyone get a load of how Obama handled the question referring to how the situation has changed in Iraq as opposed to 2006?

I suggest the man get a teleprompter because he can't even handle a staged interview.

Once he got through stuttering and his "uh's", he says, "Hindsight is 20/20, and we had to change the political debate in this country".

HA! Very well, Obama, now, you need to change your debate and give the credit to the tireless efforts of our military and diplomats who have crafted a situation on the ground that you and the media have tried so hard to hide.

The man is clueless.

Licht   July 22nd, 2008 12:04 pm ET

What Obama says here is so true. It hurts because I am so used of hearing Bush and McBush lies.

Cynthia   July 22nd, 2008 12:04 pm ET

CNN can you all pin Senator McCain down to an answer of what we will "win" when the Iraq war is completed because I have never got a clear understanding of it.

Montana is Obama Country   July 22nd, 2008 12:04 pm ET

I WILL Vote for BARACK OBAMA in Nov. 2008 for President of the United States because he is a LEADER and shows quality in understanding the complicated dynamics of countries with historical conflicts..
We can't fix everything all the time BUT we can support others when they need it and STEP back when necessary…!!

True LEADERSHIP……….

Barack the Vote……… Yes >WE< Can..

McCain = War   July 22nd, 2008 12:04 pm ET

Exactly, Iraq is the country of the Iraqi people. You would think this would be common sense, but obviously not to all. A 'perfect', 'totally safe' country has never existed since the beginning of time. Our job, as voters, is to make OUR country the best we can make it and ensure that we don't re-install a president that perpetuates war for the sake of dominance.

John   July 22nd, 2008 12:04 pm ET

This is the central point. We should stop policing the rest of the World and worry about our own people. Help the homeless, the sick, the poor first then help other countries minimally. Look at Japan, we bombed it and we built it back 10 times better than it was before. Let Iraq fend for itself, if it fails it fails.

US ARMY   July 22nd, 2008 12:04 pm ET

Billy, we agree with you
"What? If Obama's elected, then black people would be judged by the content of their character rather than the color of their skin? That's obviously not what we want to do!"

Only conservative, bigots, racist, facist would summount something like this. However, yes, every morning I watch the sun rise here over this US Army base and I imagine a new day dawning on November 5th 2008, yes Black and every person of ethic, the American Land of Dreams and opportunity, the rainbow country will turn Gold as the sun burst reveal a new dawn of a new era. America and the world will be changed in that instant can you see the change taking place right before our eyes. yes, it is a glorious day to wake up too, November 5th, 2008 and again in 2012, however keep your eyes on the sky, if you are not attentive you just might miss the sunrise.

OBAMA for US MILITARY,…YES WE CAN!

vjh   July 22nd, 2008 12:03 pm ET

A little off topic, but I have a feeling that Hagel will be Obama's choice for VP. What a great strategy that would be ! I really like the two of them together-they compliment one another.

Rob   July 22nd, 2008 12:02 pm ET

This is why Obama is the right choice. He acknowledges that the surge was helpful in bringing down violence despite his earlier opposition to it. But he also recognizes that its time to move forces to Afghanistan and fight the real war on terror over there. He will work with the Iraqis to ensure that they continue down the road of a political solution while phasing out the troops there. Ultimately, Iraqis have to be able to defend their own borders themselves. The fact remains that we never should have been there in the first place, so all of the "success" we've had is relative.

McCain really should have no shot in Nov. He has no plan for the economy and is going so far as to blame Obama for high gas prices because of his opposition to more drilling – as if we started more drilling tomorrow gas prices would just drop in half instantly. Obama has looked very Presidential during his Middle East trip and appears very comfortable in talking and negotiatiing with other world leaders. So, the argument that Obama is not credible on foreign affairs is slipping away fast.

The only solid support McCain probably has is from extreme right-wing evangelicals and racists who will be picking the lesser of 2 evils from their point of view. For some, sad to say, it may come down to picking a white guy vs a black guy and that's sad. But I think most of the country is full of good intelligent people who will vote for Obama because they see him as the candidate that can really make a difference.

Florida democrat   July 22nd, 2008 12:01 pm ET

President Obama!!!!!

Brendan H., San Antonio, TX   July 22nd, 2008 12:01 pm ET

I hope all you avowed, right-wing intelligentsia took note of a man that can actually put a sentence together and not have to read from prepared notes like fearless, Jet-Pilot!

AND A BULLETIN FOR ALL!!!

It appears we are now going to "finish" the fight we started in Afghanistan against a peoples that took on the ruthless, Soviet Army and sent them home in tatters! Many of the Western Nations have tried to tame the beast that is the under belly of Asia – and never succeeded. Learn from history!!!

ali   July 22nd, 2008 12:00 pm ET

its nice to have some intelligence in foriegn policy,and not just bluster and spin by the propaganda specialists of the republican war machine.

Paula   July 22nd, 2008 12:00 pm ET

OMG, I have been dreaming of a Mccain Jindal ticket….am I dreaming or is it really going to be true? Honestly folks….it matters not if you are a dem, a repub or an indie….you need to read and listen to this guy. Jindal is one of those once in a life time politician that is so very rare in these days and age. This guy is a genuine genius with a burning desire to be effective. The changes he has managed to make in LA and the accomplishments he has done in 37 years are rare……very very rare. I do believe we are a fortunate country to have someone like Jindal in governement. Jindal is the sort of person who will set a new standard and raise the bar on what effective leadership ought to be, should be and will be! Sorry for going on and on…but I don't get excited over a politican ever….but I must and I need to do it now. Win or loose, this country needs to know that we will be ok with someone like JIndal around in washington….and that is all I have to say.

ANGIE   July 22nd, 2008 12:00 pm ET

Catty the war in afghanistan must be won thats a war worth fighting for our protection and saftyness THATS WHERE THE TERRIOST ARE!!!

California Gold   July 22nd, 2008 11:59 am ET

If anything Vietnam taught us we might be able to throw all our military might at some "enemy" and sacrifice our youth for some vague cause (Iraq: people who hate us and scare us), but you can not "win" the people of the country. Iraq belongs to the Iraq citizens, not us. If the US were invaded would we surrender our lives to the invader? No. We would still be Americans and want our country back in our hands. Iraq isn't any different.

Debra, Alton   July 22nd, 2008 11:58 am ET

I am still trying to define winning. McCain continues to say we are winning! I agree with Obama and that is Iraqi should determine how their country moves forward.

Mike - Texas   July 22nd, 2008 11:58 am ET

mccain's entire argument for the presidency seems to be based on the success of 1 aspect of 1 battlefield strategy.

obama is correct here, and he gets my vote.

Obama 08: white, 60 year old woman   July 22nd, 2008 11:58 am ET

Cathy: Obama is recommending moving 10 000 troops to Afghanistan which is what the commanders on the ground have asked for. There are around 130 000 troops in Iraq. You do the math!!

Rick   July 22nd, 2008 11:58 am ET

Another Obama quote from his publicity-stunt, oops I mean fact-finding trip: “Israel is a strong friend of Israel.”

lol…what a moron….this guy couldn't run a lemonade stand.

Dan, Mpls, MN   July 22nd, 2008 11:58 am ET

McCain keeps touting that he knows how to win wars and Obama doesn't. Does anyone know what war he was involved the US actaully won? Is he talking about Vietnam? Is being shot down and then taken as a prisoner the criteria for winning a war?

In boxing, I thought all along that the one who got knocked out lost. I guess I was wrong. According to McCain, he is the winner

David Goldman for OBAMA   July 22nd, 2008 11:58 am ET

WHAT A NOVEL IDEA !!!!!

ALL FUTURE AMERICAN WARS SHOULD BE CONDUCTED

THE WAY CLINTON DID IN KOSOVO, WITH THE HELP OF

OTHER NATIONS & ESPECIALLY THE HELP OF THE PEOPLE

WHO ARE UNDER OPPRESSION. WE ARE GETTING KILLED

BY THE IRAQIS EVERY WEEK. THAT CAN ONLY MAKE SENSE

TO GEORGE, DICK & MCCLUELESS.

Ms. RDS   July 22nd, 2008 11:57 am ET

Thank you Obama for noting ALL the factors that contributed to the decrease in violence. The McCain camp wants to take all the credit for the surge and reduction in violence. McCain keeps saying if they listened to Obama then he wouldn't have been going to Iraq b/c it would be too dangerous. That's like the arsonist wanting credit for putting out a fire he started, that doesn't make a whole lot of sense. I say if we had listened to Obama we wouldn't be there in the first place!

HF from PA   July 22nd, 2008 11:56 am ET

Angie you are clueless…Bin Laden is from Saudi Arabia…his 2nd in command is from Egypt. The terrorist are gaining strenght in the hills of Pakistan because the current administration chose to divert limited resources to Iraque

ARB   July 22nd, 2008 11:56 am ET

ALL YOU OBAMA SUPPORTERS MAKE ME SICK, IF YOU EVEN THINK FOR ONE SECOND THAT'S HE GONNA BE ABLE TO TURN THIS COUNTRY AROUND, YOU'RE DEAD WRONG!!!

dwho   July 22nd, 2008 11:56 am ET

Brilliant.
A brillinat leader speaks brilliantly and boldly. Obama represents such.

Phil, FL   July 22nd, 2008 11:55 am ET

If we had surged in Afghanistan instead of going to Iraq, Bin Laden might have been taken care of by now.

But the cowboy had to go after Saddam becauses he "wanted to kill my daddy".

The right thing, THE WRONG WAR !!!!!

An illegal war is never the right thing to do.

Obama '08 (Stop the Warmongering !! )

Judgement over experience   July 22nd, 2008 11:55 am ET

Hey South Park Conservative – what exactly are we winning? Seriously though. We lost the day we invaded the country with over 4500 troops dead for NO reason, billions of dollars a month in debt and higher gas prices and all over a lie. And mccain supported this from day one. I will take Obama's judgement over mccain's and bush's so called 'experience' any day. We have won nothing and lost alot.

RED STATE   July 22nd, 2008 11:55 am ET

Ah yes, I remember now.

McCain had the unfortunate problem of not knowing the difference between Sunni and Shia, and also thought that Iran was equiping Al Qaeda with weapons.

Barack on the other hand
KNOWS WHAT HE IS TALKING ABOUT!!! Clearly stats his position, and gives a correct descrpition without Hagel having to interrupt him by whispering in his ear the correct response.

Will, NJ   July 22nd, 2008 11:55 am ET

We have successfully accomplished our goal of unifying all terrorists against us and creating more from displaced refugees. So now, McCain can tout his national security experience after him and the Bush administration worked so hard to stoke the fire.

Debby   July 22nd, 2008 11:54 am ET

Well now Obama is changing his tune after seeing whats taking place on the ground in Iraq. I wonder if he will be so quick to withdraw the troops even in 2012. Obama really hasn't done anything over there to be called Mr. President. The media is just giving this rock star press coverage. All the hard work and decisions that are working were made already there.

Marcelo   July 22nd, 2008 11:53 am ET

I listened to the whole press conference and was very impressed with Obama's understanding of the situations in Iraq and Afganistan. Without using words like "good vs evil," Sen. Obama was able to describe the complex situations we have going on and the competing forces. He also pointed out that Gen. Patreaus' opposition on Iraq redeployment is understandable given the General's areas of responsibility (namely, the Iraq and Afganistan theater), however, as the President of the United States, our leader must consider a wider range of issues and manage our resources economically, politically and globally, not just militarily. Sen. Obama very eloquently stated that the POTUS must not follow a military leaders' advice blindly but rather, take it into consideration with many other factors, when making a strategic decision.

My respect for Sen. Obama has grown deeper and it is my sincere hope that he continues being the light for the America in such dark times.

ali   July 22nd, 2008 11:53 am ET

why cant mccain get just one thing right.the surge has helped.but,we have armed the sunnis,to the teeth,and al-sadr has been revamping his mehdi militia,for months,now.it doesnt matter when we leave iraq,their destiny is in their own hands.now,if mccain could come up with a definition of victory,we wouldnt be left wondering how many years we are going to have to keep fighting there,for something we cant control.bush caused this war and mccain supported him for it.how dumb!

aaa   July 22nd, 2008 11:53 am ET

yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! go obama your a rock star!!!!!!! tell the world how its done in America

McCain is ghetto   July 22nd, 2008 11:53 am ET

Obama, you are the man with common sense and brilliant judgement. At least you know what your talking about unlike mccain who keeps spouting 'surge' from his lips every ten minutes forgetting we should not have been there in the first place.

Tony   July 22nd, 2008 11:52 am ET

Hear! Hear Obama.

However, if your answer to ending the war in Iraq is to withdrawal the troops and send them to Afghanistan to be murdered or maimed for life, then you just lost my vote.

The only reason I will vote for Obama is so that no republican gets the opportunity to appoint justices to the Supreme Court at any time in the foreseeable future.

If McCain were to win and name possibly 3 justices to the Court this country will stay in the sewers and continue to be a global laughing stock.

Hopefully the American people have finally opened their eyes, taken a look at the damage of the last 8 years and vote DEMOCRAT!

McCain08   July 22nd, 2008 11:51 am ET

Obama, you make me want to puke. "i dont know what would have happened if the plan i had promoted in 2007 – to put pressure- hadnt worked" you are making yourself look silly now, everybody knows you are wrong so just give up trying to brainwash people of your views.

the Surge is the only thing that turned Iraq around. it allowed the Iraqi government focus on getting their country up and running because THE INSURGENTS were being erradicated.

Nothing to do with your idea of pressuring the iraqi government as Bush was doing that anyway…..

Will in Richmond, VA   July 22nd, 2008 11:51 am ET

That's just it.

We must look at the whole story of the war and the reasons behind the decrease in hostilities being more than the Surge.

By the way, since we succeeded, can everyone come home now?

Catty   July 22nd, 2008 11:50 am ET

For all the democrats viewing Obama as their savior, Read between the lines. He is NOT bringing the troops home, he is moving them to Afghanistan. No more lives will be saved, and the war will not end.

Xavier, Saint Louis, MO   July 22nd, 2008 11:49 am ET

Obama is 1000% CORRECT! The low level of violence in Iraq didn’t take place because of the "surge." That's what McCain wants people to believe. The U.S. dollar has helped reduces the amount of violence, because we are paying our enemies to behave and not attack our troops. The almighty dollar wins again!

J. Richter   July 22nd, 2008 11:49 am ET

We put the Sunni militia under our payroll and tehy turned against Al Qaida.

At the same time we have a asurge that perpetrates the $2 billion a month war in Iraq at the expense of our own country and economics.

This is not our country. They dont want us there. Our economy is suffering. We've been there for six years and have done what is needed militarily. The rest is up to them.

If we did what Obama wanted based on his strategic thinking and judement:

We would have 4000+ American kids still alive.
We would have 30,000+ American kids healthy and with all their limbs.
We would have a military that isn't near the breaking point.
We would have $800+ billion still in our Treasury.
We would have finished the job in Afghanistan years ago.
We wouldn't been seen around the world as Imperialist.
We wouldn't have an empowered and emboldened Iran.

Jayson   July 22nd, 2008 11:49 am ET

We also don't know what would have happened if Osama Ben Laden had been hugged more as a child either….. Who cares what might have happened if your plan had been implemented? The fact is that the surge was implemented and all the pieces fell into place to lead to the levels of violence dropping off dramatically. You can't take credit for that just like you can't take credit for anything else thought up by the military and put into action by the President.

Dr.Mimi De La Cruz for OBAMA   July 22nd, 2008 11:48 am ET

YEA, THANK YOU. IRAQIS NEED TO TAKE CARE OF IRAQ.

I WANT MY TAX $S GOING TO AMERICANS FIRST. I AM

EVEN WILLING TO PAY MORE TAXES TO REBUILD

MY AMERICA. WE HAD NO BUSINESS GOING INTO

IRAQ IN THE FIRST PLACE & WE HAVE NO BUSINESS

STAYING THERE. LETS REBUILD LOUISIANA.

Biffington, Biff   July 22nd, 2008 11:48 am ET

Obama said today…..
"I am pleased that as a consequence of great effort by our troops — but also as a consequence of a shift in allegiances among the Sunni tribal leaders, as well as the decision of the Sadr militias to stand down — that we've seen a quelling of violence," he said.

But, Obama said, a functioning Iraq will ultimately depend on the capacity of the Iraqi people to unify themselves, get beyond sectarian divisions and set up a government that works for the people.

_ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
so… HE PRAISED AND ACKNOWLEDGED THE HARD WORK AND CONTRIBUTIONS OF OUR FIGHTING MEN AND WOMEN…

"THEN" took it a step further as to what will facilitate "A FUNCTIONING IRAQ"….

mark these words….. the idiots will twist, downplay, and 'partial-quote' this all day to attack and minimize what he said…. ITS ALL THEY GOT, FOLKS….. ITS ALL THEY GOT!!!!!

Abby   July 22nd, 2008 11:48 am ET

In about 30 minutes, Senator McCain will respond as his whole strategy has been reduced to waiting for Senator Obama to speak and attacking with something lame that wont even sell newspapers taht they are forced to reject it.

US ARMY   July 22nd, 2008 11:48 am ET

SO PRESIDENTIAL, look at HAGEL- NEBRASKA will go DEMOCRATIC. Can you see what BARACK is cooking?!

PUMA - Murphy   July 22nd, 2008 11:47 am ET

This is one of the smartest things this man has said. While I am not an Obama supporter, he's actually struck a cord with me. I believe this is something that HRC would be in line with.

The Iraqi people are absolutely responsible for the outcome once we move out. We have given them the fishing pole, the bait, and showed the the best spot to fish at the lake but we cannot stick around and do the fishing for them. We have taught them to fish, it is now time for them to fish without us.

Richard, St. Paul, MN   July 22nd, 2008 11:46 am ET

You used 'stability' and Iraq in the same sentence! Good Joke!

Capt. Smash, Salt Lake City, Utah   July 22nd, 2008 11:46 am ET

Seven years later and still no OBL. The McWar camp and the GOP wants to make Iraq the 51st state. Take there oil put the Iraq people on reservations and build casinos. And they wonder why the rest of the world does not like us?

Mike   July 22nd, 2008 11:46 am ET

Iraq cannot function without our complete takeover. One way to ween ourselves off of foreign oil dependance is to simply take over the Middle East. Then it will be considered an extension of America, and no longer foreign. It's brilliant. Why didn't McCain come up with this?

South Park Conservative   July 22nd, 2008 11:46 am ET

Wait? Obama is admitting a "reduction in violence" and "stability" in Iraq? I thought this war was lost? Oh, Senator Reid! I think you need to speak with the junior senator from Illinois and school him on your story line.

Capt. Smash, Salt Lake City, Utah   July 22nd, 2008 11:46 am ET

Seven years later and still no OBL. The McWar camp and the GOP wants to make Iraq the 51st state. Take there oil put the Iraq people on reservations and build casinos. And they wonder why the rest of the world does not like us?

Ian   July 22nd, 2008 11:45 am ET

A government that works for the people? What an interesting concept.

jason, tx   July 22nd, 2008 11:44 am ET

Stick that in your Craw mr. McCain.

karen-phoenix   July 22nd, 2008 11:44 am ET

Obama is so so right!!! Circle of life!!! Out with the old and in with the new. I'm 64, a recovering republican and every time I seen McCain I switch channels. I DO NOT want to be reminded of all the failures we have had in Vietnam and Iraq. Not to mention jobs, health care and the economy. Peace is Patriotic and this is what Obama represents.

Mel   July 22nd, 2008 11:44 am ET

OBAMA IS CORRECT WE ARE IN THE MIDDLE OF IRAQS CIVIL WAR. WE CAN'T FIX THE SITUATION ONLY THEY CAN.

wmelpaul   July 22nd, 2008 11:44 am ET

Now why would we do that? Halliburton can't make a dime in Afghanistan. What is this guy crazy? Pick another country…one with big oil like Saudi Arabia, but not Saudi Arabia, that's where we take innocent people for torture. Remember, waterboarding people is the only way Dick Cheney can forget the fact that he has a lesbian for a daughter.

carolflowery   July 22nd, 2008 11:43 am ET

quote from Barak today during a press conference there
"always stay away from the words never and always" lolololololol

G   July 22nd, 2008 11:42 am ET

It's nice to hear some common sense for a change. Of course, momentarily, the sheep will appear to spout right wing talking points. At least it's entertaining watching them spin. Time to begin a secure withdrawal from Iraq. We can't afford the occupation.

Greg, NY   July 22nd, 2008 11:42 am ET

I can't wait to hear what Hagel has to say after this trip. As a very good friend to McCain, it'll be great when Hagel puts him in his place.

ANGIE   July 22nd, 2008 11:42 am ET

Thats right have we all forgotten thats where bin laden is from thats where the 911 attacks were planned thats where the terriost are gaining strenght!!!

Capt. Smash, Salt Lake City, Utah   July 22nd, 2008 11:41 am ET

"If Sen. Obama had had his way, the troops would have been out by this past March, and Sen. Obama voted to cut off funding for our troops in Iraq," McCain said to reporters

Yes, yes, you are so right McWar and if Obama would of had his way 4200 Americans would still be alive. We would have saved 4 trillion dollars and had lower oil prices. Keep talking Mcwar you are helping Obama win this thing.

I am still waiting for someone to tell me what we have gained by this war in Iraq? What have we gained?

McWar/Hadji Now thats something to think about!

Lorna, NY   July 22nd, 2008 11:41 am ET

Hello Mr. President!

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room. Download this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

Follow us on Twitter

CNN on TwitterGet Ticker updates the moment they appear online via the Web, SMS, or instant messages.
Follow politicalticker

Categories
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. All comments should be relevant to the topic and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. You are solely responsible for your own comments, the consequences of posting those comments, and the consequences of any reliance by you on the comments of others. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying and other information you provide via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2008 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com VIP