August 7, 2008
Posted: 04:30 PM ET

From
Sen. McCain took questions at a town hall event in Ohio Thursday.
Sen. McCain took questions at a town hall event in Ohio Thursday.

LIMA, Ohio (CNN) – John McCain offered a new justification for the Iraq war Thursday, arguing that if Saddam Hussein were still in power, he’d be a petro-dictator intent on using today's sky-high oil revenues to obtain weapons of mass destruction.

A voter at an Ohio town hall meeting Thursday asked McCain how he would vote on the 2002 war resolution if he had to do it again, given the advantage of hindsight.

“What do you think that Saddam Hussein would be doing with oil at $120, $125, $130 a barrel?,” McCain asked. “What do you think he’d be doing? I’ll tell you what he’d be doing. He’d be doing what he said he was committed to doing. And that’s acquiring and using weapons of mass destruction, which he did twice before.”

The Arizona senator elaborated on his other reasons for supporting the war resolution, including Iraq’s noncompliance with the U.N. mandated cease fire, as well as Saddam’s “brutal” human rights record.

Ultimately, McCain concluded, “If he were still in power, I believe that the world would be far worse off, especially with all the money he’d be making off of oil.”

Filed under: John McCain


Len in Washington   August 7th, 2008 4:32 pm ET

So…are you saying the war really WAS about oil after all?

"Trust me, my friends."

Obama supporter: Now McCain is FINALLY getting equal time and scrutiny!   August 7th, 2008 4:32 pm ET

New day..new message…a desperate man/

Bob Indianapolis, IN   August 7th, 2008 4:32 pm ET

Using this pretzel logic, it would be in the interest of the US to invade Saudi Arabia, as the majority of the hijackers during 9/11 were Saudi. Blowing up mecca might turn the whole Arab world against us, but that's the cowboy mentality, isn't it?

H Jay   August 7th, 2008 4:33 pm ET

Grandpa McCain forgot the the price of oil is higher because we went to war in Iraq in the first place.

Nate Hussein   August 7th, 2008 4:33 pm ET

At least Saddam kept the oil flowing. Is it always fear, fear, fear with this guy?

zina   August 7th, 2008 4:33 pm ET

How many times does this man have to tell us the truth about his Iraq war stance, and we just turn our heads?

We need sanity and peace.

Obama '08

Morgan   August 7th, 2008 4:33 pm ET

What? Isn't that the justification Bush used?
So it is okay to stage preemptive war against countries that have oil or something we want? Isn't that called Imperialism?

Tell me McCain misspoke.

Ken, LA California   August 7th, 2008 4:34 pm ET

This is exactly why we dont need him as president, he will lead us to another dumb war, they said Oil will be cheaper after the war, well it is now more expensive. Where are the WMD's, why have you killed 4000 of our brave soldiers for nothing?

LT for Obama   August 7th, 2008 4:34 pm ET

So he and his goons got rid of him and yet oil more then doubled this year. Way to go.

Becky   August 7th, 2008 4:35 pm ET

And imagine the horrible state of America if McCain was in power. Point made.

Jimmie G   August 7th, 2008 4:35 pm ET

Without the Iraq war, oil wouldn't BE at $120 a barrel.
And we wouldn't have spent so much of our tax dollars, and worse, American blood.

James   August 7th, 2008 4:35 pm ET

John my friend, the reason gas prices are crazy is because supplies are tight (war in the middle east), the dollar is weak (Thanks George for your un-funded, un-ending war) and demand is going up (no convervation and alternatives based energy plan)

Invading Iraq and GWB CAUSED these problems!!!

Filipina   August 7th, 2008 4:35 pm ET

You vote war coz you are a warmonger,,,,obviously you are not watching the news about the new book of Ron Suskind.

rumpusgoopus   August 7th, 2008 4:35 pm ET

So, McCain is now officially insane, right?

Jon   August 7th, 2008 4:36 pm ET

It's nice to know that John McCain could read the future the back in 2002–he knew oil prices would get this high, and was determined to get rid of Saddam before he could take advantage. Who knows what vision of the future McCain will have next that might drive the U.S. into it's next ill-conceived war?!

Well, McCain must have lost his Magic 8-Ball, because these days it would be telling him to drop out of the race before he's humiliated in November.

jk   August 7th, 2008 4:36 pm ET

With that Justification then we may as well bomb bomb everyone making money off oil.

justin in CO   August 7th, 2008 4:36 pm ET

"cause & effect" was never analogous to "chicken & egg", mr. mccain. you can't just put one before the other at your convenience.

Willow, from Iowa   August 7th, 2008 4:37 pm ET

If Hussein were still in power, at least IRan would have a balance in the region. We took out Hussein, leaving Iran with the strength in the region. If we had spent these 700 billion dollars on alternative energies 8 years ago, we would be almost completely energy independent by now.

JoelWhy   August 7th, 2008 4:37 pm ET

ARE YOU KIDDING ME?!? It's pretty obvious that one reason oil is so expensive is BECAUSE we invaded Iraq!! Wow, and I used to have a bit of respect for McCain. How far he has fallen…

Sean, milwaukee, WI   August 7th, 2008 4:37 pm ET

So the war was for oil?

Greg, San Francisco, CA   August 7th, 2008 4:38 pm ET

This is specious reasoning at it's finest/worst.

Obama08   August 7th, 2008 4:38 pm ET

What an idiot…

obamacrat   August 7th, 2008 4:38 pm ET

Wow! I can't beleive he said that. I hope Obama is all over this ridiculous statement. The Iraq war is justified because Saddam would have obtained WMDs with all the money he made off exploiting the oil market. That's crazy talk old man!

Wilson, Seattle   August 7th, 2008 4:38 pm ET

Oh my gosh! Prices wouldn't be so high if we hadn't invaded Iraq! This argument is VERY weak.

Aaron Allison   August 7th, 2008 4:39 pm ET

Probably the same thing our president has been doing with our money…destroying the planet and our nations image all at the same time.

dAVE   August 7th, 2008 4:39 pm ET

Wrong again McSame.

This disastrous war should NEVER have happened, and we all know it.

Ken Pittsburgh   August 7th, 2008 4:40 pm ET

This is pure crazy talked so we go to war five years before high fuel price to keep fuel low .We wre told that this war was not about oil.

Adam, Los Angeles   August 7th, 2008 4:40 pm ET

Isn't that putting the "cart before the horse"? Sounds like someone needs a course in logic.

In any case, I'm glad McCain finally admitted it: THIS WAR IS ABOUT OIL AND CONTROL not about terrorism or wmd's

Anonymous   August 7th, 2008 4:40 pm ET

You have got to be kidding me.

Obama's vacation timing is perfect. McCain with several days in an uninterrupted media spotlight (just what he wanted).

He might concede the race next week.

AL in West Palm Beach, FL   August 7th, 2008 4:41 pm ET

McClueless… there was no attempt. there was no weapon…

THERE WAS NOTHING

Lil Kim of North Korea is killings his own people too… does that mean you'd start another Korean war given the chance?

My friends… if we elect this old white-haired dude, we're in trouble.

Matt   August 7th, 2008 4:41 pm ET

Another misleading headline by CNN.

Along with spin in the article.

Somehow, CNN loves to help aid Obama into a dishonest campaign.

Childish and dishonest.

Nick   August 7th, 2008 4:41 pm ET

Wow, never thought someone this blind could make it this far:
1. We could of heavily subsidized oil in this country and reduced gas by $1/gallon easily if we didn't spent all that money in Iraq.
2. We wouldn't be wasting fuel driving tanks and airplanes around the desert, which causes an increase in demand.
3. We wouldn't of created instability in the region which is a chief cause of a lot of this speculation.

Sadaam had palaces with the nicest amenities. He had no problems with money at oil's current price. Yes, giving him more money would be a bad thing, but maybe McCain should of voted for alternative energies in the past so we wouldn't be so frigging dependent on that oil. Solving the problem instead of prolonging it, what a novel idea.

edw   August 7th, 2008 4:41 pm ET

The only reason we are in this war is because of oil. The criminals that attacked us on 9/11 are not in Iraq, they are in Afghanistan. McCain signed off and voted for this wrong war. He gets millions from the oil companies and he will sell us out for another dime.

Gorbashov - Long Beach, Ca.   August 7th, 2008 4:42 pm ET

Are the hundreds of thousands of dead Iraqi's far better off? How about the almost 4200 dead Americans are they better off?

You senile old man. You are a disgrace to humanity!!!

What happened to the McCain of 2000???

Sold his soul to the devil and will do and say anything to reach the White House.

Disgusting!!!

Watermann   August 7th, 2008 4:42 pm ET

CNN. don`t you know or even remember that it was the US who provided Sadam Hussein with all his weapons to attack Iran, or are you that short minded?

biffington, biff   August 7th, 2008 4:42 pm ET

McCain is speculating more than those who actually drove the price of oil up!!!

That is QUITE a stretch!

The mental gymnastics it takes for him to get to THAT conclusion would qualify McCain for the OLYMPICS!!

Mark, Pasadena, CA   August 7th, 2008 4:42 pm ET

The Crypt Keeper is an idiot. The entire reason oil is $120/barrel is because we are over there stirring things up for no good reason. Oil traders use the excuse of "regional instability" to drive up their profits. If none of this had ever happened, and Hussein were allowed to pump oil unimpeded, we would be looking at oil prices in the $30-$50/barrel range. As far as security goes, Hussein was being well-contained for years. Even if did have WMDs, nobody has ever explained how Iraq could have delivered them to US territory. Absent that, it's not our problem.

Josh   August 7th, 2008 4:43 pm ET

One of the strongest upward pressures on oil prices the past 5 years has been our military engagement in the region. McCain falls victim to the fallacy of the pre-determined outcome. If we hadn't removed Hussein by force, the Middle East would be more politically stable, which would mean lower oil prices today. Give it a rest, old man. You've done unspeakably courageous things for your country in the past; let us move forward into the future with our eternal gratitude for your service.

Anonymous   August 7th, 2008 4:43 pm ET

McCain's strong suit is town hall-style meetings? He really wants to go toe-to-toe with Obama in a venue where a script is worthless? He wants to challenge Obama in a setting that requires off-the-cuff responses?

Obama should suggest they have one every other day.

Gary of El Centro, Ca   August 7th, 2008 4:43 pm ET

So in hindsight, McCain would still have invaded Iraq because Saddam was a bad man and had oil at his disposal. That tells you what we can expect if McCain gets elected. Using that criteria, we will soon be invading virtually every country in the Middle-East. What a swell idea…….NOT!

kendall   August 7th, 2008 4:44 pm ET

How dumb does he think we are? Oil prices surged after the Iraq war started, Oil prices go up when there is a war, I said it before McCains strategy for the White House is to tell so many lies that no one knows exactly where he stands.
This is not the 2004 McCain r the 2000 McCain, Just imagine the 2009- 2012 McCain, it will just get worse.

That statement is insulting

sherry for Obama   August 7th, 2008 4:44 pm ET

your the reason the oil is so high mc-have -no-shame
Sinnce the the white house has been with Bush evrything has gone up………..

Mitchell   August 7th, 2008 4:44 pm ET

Not True, Obama would go have tea with him and the whole world would sing be as one.

Incoherent Economics   August 7th, 2008 4:44 pm ET

McCain … did you ever stop to think that if Saddam were in power the region would be much calmer and the price of oil would be well below $100 per barrel.

Don't you and Phil Gramm believe we are in a psychological recession and that the psychological impacts on the price of oil are superior to the effect of supply & demand ? (you non-economist).

ls   August 7th, 2008 4:44 pm ET

OH MY GOSH - the mindset of McCain is WRONG. To say a man, whose sons were killed, and his life destroyed was based on speculation.

Well, there's your answer to why a lot of American's were killed and STILL are being killed, because of OIL.

CNN, your posting of MCCAIN ALL day long has finally made me literally SICK! THIS IS TOO MUCH !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

OBAMA 08   August 7th, 2008 4:44 pm ET

Well if thats the case…a McCain presidency means war with Iran and Venezuela.

I hope no one has any 18-21 year old children.

R.I.F.   August 7th, 2008 4:44 pm ET

WHAT!!!!!!!!! This is supposed to be the foreign affairs guru???

This is the silliest answer I've ever heard. Money was the least of Saddam's worries. He had access to enough money when gas was $30 a barrel to buy whatever he would've needed to make WMDs. What an idiot. Why doesn't the media call him on the bull.

CNN = Jerry Springer of news   August 7th, 2008 4:45 pm ET

This man really scares me. No hindsight and he is even trying to tie in the oil prices to WMDs!! WWIII seems a certainty if we elect this senile, bitter old man who is still trying to make up for Vietnam. The US will soon become the lost Roman Empire with this way of thinking. Overextending our military presence while owing countries like China trillions of dollars - not very patriotic if you ask me.

seeing the truth   August 7th, 2008 4:45 pm ET

COUNTRY FIRST? MY FRIENDS, CHCK OUT EXXONMCCAIN.COM TO SEE HOW MCCAIN IS REALLY COUNTRY FIRST.

Terry from VA   August 7th, 2008 4:45 pm ET

This old dude is out of his mind and out of touch. Please God in heaven help us.

Conrad   August 7th, 2008 4:46 pm ET

Did McCain ever consider the possibility that the high cost of oil is partially attributable to the war in Iraq?

Dayahka   August 7th, 2008 4:46 pm ET

Don't you remember, John, or is your memory gone too, that we were not allowing him to sell oil freely anyway, and so he'd still be facing sanctions and unable to profit in the way you suggest. And isn't it sort of odd, now it's not that the US went to war to find WMDs, but to prevent him from being able to buy them when the price of oil went up six years later. Tongue disconnected from your brain, old chap?

arc, Lugano CH   August 7th, 2008 4:47 pm ET

WMD in Iraq = Bush/Cheney Lies = Hillary Supporters for McCain

Hannah   August 7th, 2008 4:47 pm ET

That is absurd. So Senator McCain would still enter into a war in Iraq, knowing that the reasons were false? That is essentially what he is saying here because the advantage of hindsight tells us that all the evidence of WMD was false.

DB   August 7th, 2008 4:47 pm ET

If George Bush and John Mccain hadn't invaded Iraq, the region would be much more stable, in which case, as anybody who understands the economy would know, there would not have been a huge run up in the cost of oil. Yes, the price oil would obviously be increasing due to increased global consumption, but the huge RUN UP was caused by the unstable situation.

Once the Bush administartion started to negotiate with Iran, as Obama has suggested all along, and Congess started talking about cracking down on speculators, also as Obama has suggested all along, oil prices started to come back down.

It is obvious to any rational obserer that the failed Republican policies are to blame for high and unstable oil price.

voter   August 7th, 2008 4:47 pm ET

Fear mongering!! (and btw, Canada/Mexico provide us WAAAY more oil than the middle east)

Stop diluding yourself to suit your agenda McSame! You'll find ANYTHING to justify a WAR because you want "winner" written next to your name in the history books. My children will NOT fight a war for you!

war drill war drill war drill

mike E DANVILLE,VA   August 7th, 2008 4:48 pm ET

Mcwar just likes to start fights and have someone else do the fighting for him. Send Mcwar to the inner-city on one of the corners and have him start his own war. Not only start it but fight it too. I feel more threatend by whats going on in our own communitys than in Iraq.

DR. YES   August 7th, 2008 4:48 pm ET

wow!you voted for the war ,so,saddam wouldnt get rich,when the price of oil went up?o…….kay……..whatever…..you must have gotten one of bush's "memos",too…..maybe you should drop out of the race,and write a book about how you were mislead by a forged letter or something.i hear there's lot's of money in it.

Brian Phoenix AZ   August 7th, 2008 4:48 pm ET

What about the 80 billion that the Iraqi's are making off it and the US is still funding this unholy war?????

Jason   August 7th, 2008 4:49 pm ET

Huh? The prices wouldn't be as high as they are if we hadn't gone into Iraq.

Mike   August 7th, 2008 4:49 pm ET

Gas wasn't expensive when you voted, or did you forget again. Idiot! Please dont vote for this guy. At least vote for a real Republican in Barr.

Jeanne   August 7th, 2008 4:50 pm ET

what a thing to say………….shameful.

Ann   August 7th, 2008 4:50 pm ET

But the price of oil is more than triple what it was when Saddam was in power BECAUSE of the war! Man- McCain is better at Orwellian newspeak than I thought!

stephy   August 7th, 2008 4:50 pm ET

why doesn't the white house just admitt that the war in Iraq is all about oil. Our soldiers are giving there life for the greed of George Bush. Why can't americans see the forest for the trees. there's a reason why other countries don't like america, it's because they know why america invaded Iraq, and it wasn't for WMD.

stephanie hacker   August 7th, 2008 4:50 pm ET

Well now isn't this special. First it was Saddam was a dictator hell bent on getting WMD's, then it was becasue he committed genocide on his own people in the 80's while certain Administration Officials held hands with them, then it was to liberate the Iraqi people. McCain just does not get it. He and his party claimed it would be a swift and fast victory, the Iraqi's would throw candy and flowers at us and the best one is hey their oil would pay for the war. While we as taxpayers are paying billions of dollars for this war, the Iraqi Government is sitting on a 79 billion dollar surplus. And the beauty of all this is we are paying them interest for holding their money. Is this what John McCain calls winning in Iraq? Just wanted to ask that question. I along with the majority of Americans now want to know John McCain what is your definition of victory in Iraq? We though it was "Mission Accomplished" several years ago aboard the big boat Fly Boy George was on. thx for all your support

Shawn   August 7th, 2008 4:52 pm ET

Nice Speculative Justification, McSame. Sounds like something Bush would say.

Fear Talk Express : Full steam ahead!

Jonathan of Tampa, FL   August 7th, 2008 4:52 pm ET

I really think John McCain has gone insane. He is using the worst hypothetical scenario I can think of. I can tell you the reason oil is where it is today is because of The Iraq War. Look at your calenders when oil started to rise. Just like George W., McCain thinks it's cool to drop bombs on people who might have a weapon that could get into the hands of a terrorist and may end up being used against America. He will drop a bomb if someone sneezes wrong and call it the threat of getting Americans sick. Come on America..do not buy into this war mongers fearful philosophies on why we should kill and train people in the middle east to think like Americans.
If John McCain is telling the truth how come he is not leading "INVASION: THE SURGE IN IRAN"? I mean, the threat of Nuclear weapons is a serious threat. Come on McCain don't be lame and play games, what is it you are saying? Be consistent. Be real and have a tiny bit of morals.

-K&H-   August 7th, 2008 4:53 pm ET

Was there proof of WMD's because I can remember we found none.

seeing the truth   August 7th, 2008 4:53 pm ET

one would think that after saying the same talking points , pandering and lying as long as John has…one would think he would not need Que cards…guess it must be memory loss. that happens at that age i guess

SimonSays   August 7th, 2008 4:53 pm ET

Ummm…hello…Iraq had an embargo against selling its oil on the open market. That's why they needed the oil for food program. So what is he talking about Saddam taking advantage of high oil prices???

Ian   August 7th, 2008 4:53 pm ET

Amen.

As someone who worked over there during the "U.N. Sanction" years, I personally saw oil being smuggled out of Iraq in trains of tankers.

We definitely weren't cutting into his income, and let's not forget all the other resolutions he broke, kicking the weapons inspectors out numerous times and taking pot shots at American pilots enforcing the no-fly zone.

People seem to have short memories in this country.

Everyone complains about the current cost of the war, but I'd like to know how much money we spent policing Saddam Hussein from 1991 until the current war. That was over a decade of wasted resources trying to keep that man in line.

Good riddance.

JA Cook   August 7th, 2008 4:53 pm ET

The US should invade any country that has what we want unless they voluntarily turn it over to us at what we decide is a fair price.

McCain 08
Better than Bush

Paul   August 7th, 2008 4:53 pm ET

Oil wouldnt be $130 a barrel if the likes of you hadnt gone and messed the world up in the first place!!

Army Vet in Charlotte   August 7th, 2008 4:53 pm ET

He must really be joking with this.

One of the BIG reasons for oil's price increase is INSTABILITY IN OIL-PRODUCING REGIONS, LIKE THE MIDDLE EAST. Iran did it a few weeks ago with their missile testing to raise oil prices and make a few million more bucks. Doing something like starting a war is sure to make prices go up, not down! This says something about his grasp of economics.

And for the record, Saddam had given up his nuke program years before we invaded. And he had no ties to terrorists either, so those are out.

If you want to talk about a brutal human rights record as a justification for invasion, then let's go after Saudi Arabia next. Public executions, subjugation of women, complete lack of religious freedom, etc.

Another Canadian   August 7th, 2008 4:53 pm ET

This is so Ridiculous and sad that Mr. McCain is still trying to justify that horrible war . You do not need to do that anymore Sir. Please move on with the real issues at hand . Loss of Jobs and house foreclosures have got to be the # 1 issue !

K.   August 7th, 2008 4:54 pm ET

Wow, WMDs. Haven't heard that one in a while. McCain's dusting off the oldies (no pun intended).

Lyndon   August 7th, 2008 4:54 pm ET

These people can only fool the American people. They will swallow any line hook line and sinker. They were duped into getting rid of Saddam for the Iranians(i.e. curveball and Akmed Chalabi) and they gladly went along because the big oil companies were complicit and satiated. I don't know about the average Joe, but "fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me."

Praetorian, Fort Myers   August 7th, 2008 4:54 pm ET

Go home McCain–as crazy and adolescent as Obam is–you are old enough to have more common sense.

Libertarians–no games, no crap, just commons sense and the constitution/bill of rights.

Thank you for your support.
Bob Barr 2008

karen-phoenix   August 7th, 2008 4:54 pm ET

McCain is out of his mind!! You can not project "what ifs"!! McCain is sooooo out of touch with reality. All he wants is an excuss for war, war and more war. No Draft, No more wars. Out with the very old, and in with young, educated, good judgement, and no radical temper!!! mcCain scares me!!!! Go Obama

Joe   August 7th, 2008 4:54 pm ET

if we had not gone to war, would our economy be this bad?????????!!!!! This joker is just like Bush. I guess Saddam cause the mortgage mess too.

Mary, Dallas, Texas   August 7th, 2008 4:54 pm ET

War monger.

Citizen for Boysenberry Jam   August 7th, 2008 4:54 pm ET

This unjustified war against a fully contained Saddam Hussein is WHY gas prices got this high. How many straws can this fool grasp at?????

Arthur   August 7th, 2008 4:54 pm ET

So while the Iraq government has an $80,000,000,000 surplus from their oil reserves, the United States is still bearing the full cost of this invasion and occupation, and somehow it's Hussein's fault? Is McCain incapable of using reason? This man is wackier than W.

Dave   August 7th, 2008 4:54 pm ET

I don't know, the same thing all the other middle eastern states do? Fund terrorism, oppress their people, live like kings while their people suffer…we don't mind allying with them though.
The reason we went to Iraq turned out to be a lie, you can't fix that with hypotheticals 7 years later.

Mattk   August 7th, 2008 4:55 pm ET

except the UN already had sanctions against what he could use the oil for and price, etc……MCCAIN IS TOO OLD AND HYPOCRITICAL!

Ell TX   August 7th, 2008 4:55 pm ET

Unbelievable! The man has a one track mind!

Dennise   August 7th, 2008 4:55 pm ET

HA! That's funny, when Saddam was in power, our petro wasn't that high. Next justification for war please

Shirley   August 7th, 2008 4:55 pm ET

MCcain,
American loss over four thousand men and woman in this War.
What you think he would have been doing is not worth the lives of four
thousand service men and woman.
Saddam's brutal human rights issues is no our business, we should
take of our own human rights ISSUES. Your reason for the War
resulution is sick.
Thanks.

Tony Z- MD   August 7th, 2008 4:56 pm ET

Where is this logic? We did not find WMD. So, he would have acquired this all of a sudden. So, are we now the UN enforcer while other countries were not in agreement? Sounds like a WarHawk.

When he is talking about "human rights"- Is China next on the list?

I wish the Straight Talk Express and Maverick were here to see this. They would not recognize this guy at all. So sad.

Adam   August 7th, 2008 4:56 pm ET

Hey McCain, if we didn't go into Iraq we would have billions of dollars to invest in renewable resources. You are a warmonger, all you know is to kill and destroy for power. You will be dead in 20 years and have no vision for the future, leave the rest of the civilized world alone.

So the Bush team decided I want that   August 7th, 2008 4:56 pm ET

So the Bush team decided I want that and so here we are 5 years later, trillions of dollars in debt and countless of lives lost so he (Bush) can have control of that oil.

Capt'n Fatty   August 7th, 2008 4:56 pm ET

oh McNuggets please shut up

Cathy   August 7th, 2008 4:56 pm ET

Everyone knows the war wasn't about WMD but the oil. Bush and Cheney have a nice fat bank account waiting for them after January.

JEric   August 7th, 2008 4:56 pm ET

Wow this is going to come back and bite him. Outright stupidity that's all I can say.

Jim Thompson   August 7th, 2008 4:57 pm ET

Listen, even though Paul Wolfowitz, Cheney and the gang said that we'd be paying for the war in Iraq with Iraqi oil, IT HAS NOT HAPPENED!! Even though the government of Iraq is raking in billions in oil revenue, it is still, you and I, the American taxpayer who are footing the bill for this mess. The military has a name for stuff like this. FUBAR.

Neil K, Lake Forest CA   August 7th, 2008 4:57 pm ET

Senator, oil prices have skyrocketed in part because we are IN Iraq. Do you not get that?

An American   August 7th, 2008 4:57 pm ET

Wow, unbelievable!

Mike Philly   August 7th, 2008 4:57 pm ET

That is the stupidest thing I've ever heard in my life. He took her question and turned it into something completely different. I'll bet if CNN tracked her down and asked how she felt about that answer, she'd tell you she's really pissed off to have been used that way.

JS   August 7th, 2008 4:57 pm ET

Did McCain just confirm that a primary motivation for the Iraq War was oil?

SidearmS   August 7th, 2008 4:57 pm ET

You have to be kidding me…

No, seriously, did McClain just pull WMDs back into the discussion?

Isn't he speaking in a town in which one his campaign managers DOOMED to outsourcing because he lobbied for DHL?

Meanwhile, the member of Saudi royalty known as Osama Bin Laden is still alive, and he IS profiting from the high price of oil. So three cheeers for that (sarcasm there folks).

Remember, as the article from a few weeks stated, "speculators were allowed into the market by a THEN REPUBLICAN CONGRESS."

And remind yourselves again, just how much money is Iraq making from oil revenues this year?

Everytime I think McClain (who I used to like a lot) sinks low like this and can not sink any lower, he one-ups himself.

Sad, just plain sad.

JB, Nashville, TN   August 7th, 2008 4:57 pm ET

Expensive gas is always a good reason to bomb another country. I think the price of Guiness is too high — can we invade Ireland??

Charlie Cameron   August 7th, 2008 4:57 pm ET

Now McCain is nostradamus, to bad 26 years ago he didn't predict high gas prices.

Chris from NY   August 7th, 2008 4:58 pm ET

What a wonderful reason to sacrifice the lives of thousands of American soldiers. Saddam may have been the worst dictator that ever lived but he was never worthy of a drop of blood of any American soldier. To hear that we invaded a sovereign country for the simple reason of violation of human rights is disgusting. If there's enough reason to invade a nation why haven't we invaded china. China has been one of the world's violators of human rights and they are still ecnonmically and politically thriving. Same are for countries in the thrid world countries and how many have we invaded or are threatening to invade them too if they have natural resorces especially oil?

Phil in KC   August 7th, 2008 4:58 pm ET

Aha! So it finally comes out - this war really was all about the oil.
We knew it, but it's interesting to hear a Republican finally admit it.

APS in Hawaii   August 7th, 2008 4:58 pm ET

Yes, and this is why McCain comes across as an intellectual nut case. There is no way that Bush would have gotten the public behind a war with Iraq if it was not for 9/11 and the lies that followed. I am personally upset with the Democratic nuts that took impeachment off the table. There needs to be safe guards in place to prevent this type of misleading the public from ever happening again. There should never be a war without a direct threat and proper justification.

bridgette   August 7th, 2008 4:58 pm ET

How worse off can the world be. Everyone hates us. We have lost just about all of our allies. The oil was not this high before we went to war. Supposedly, atleast this is what we were told, that the war would pay for itself through Iraq's oil reserves and that has just not happened. This man truly does not know what he is talking about. And all jokes aside he is not ready too lead. Celebrity or not I trust American under Obama's leadership. Because the more I hear this guy talking the more he scares me.

Change   August 7th, 2008 4:58 pm ET

Well this man is cazzy, on what world is he living

gate   August 7th, 2008 4:58 pm ET

I guess senile McCain forgot that there was an embargo against Iraq and he couldn't sell that oil unless it was through the UN oil for food program. He also forgot to mention that Saddam got those WMD's and permission to use them from the Reagan administration.

Those who forget their history are doomed to repeat it. What a moron. I'm sure his ignorant followers are eating it up though. Good job on the fact checking CNN.

MD Indepedent   August 7th, 2008 4:58 pm ET

Seems like more of the same… The politics of fear are at play by the Republicans before an election. I reject this nonsense rhetoric as pandering for votes. Everyone knows that Saddam didn't have the weapons that Bush and McCain said he had. This is just a hypothetical statement from a proven liar.

Jordan - San Marcos TX   August 7th, 2008 4:58 pm ET

Keep going John, you're saving the Obama Campaign a lot of work.

Darryl Miller   August 7th, 2008 4:58 pm ET

That a fat lie,just remember Micheal More 9/11 video where he tape Dick Chaney say they're all fools. The American public will pay whatever we set the preice of gas they will pay what ever….

Look at the video

kev from florida   August 7th, 2008 4:59 pm ET

I believe the world will be far worse off if men with the mindset of our current President are allowed to continue running this country.

Mikey   August 7th, 2008 4:59 pm ET

Perhaps McCain did not get the memo that there were no WMD in Iraq. Is he now saying it is okay for us to attack a sovereign nation because we don't like their leader? Should we start making a list of future engagements under a McCain presidency now?

Oh, and by the way. Wasn't Iraqi oil supposed to pay for rebuilding? Where the heck is all of the oil money? Are we still not pumping any oil 5 years later? Or do we have no control over the money? (boy, that would be a surprise!) If the oil was supposed to pay for this mess at $30 a barrel, why do we have $120 oil AND a $1 trillion bill for the war? Who's pockets are full of oil money???????????????

Asad Aftab   August 7th, 2008 4:59 pm ET

It is funny how John McCain came up with this conclusion. He is trying to justify the war in Iraq and this is the best he has? Iraq war was fought for self defense, a clause in International Law. Its his frustration and unpopularity for the prime post that is making him make such meaningless comments.

LB   August 7th, 2008 4:59 pm ET

John McCain knew in 2001 that these six months was going to happen? And his answer was to go to war with the country as a solution?

When all you have is a hammer, suddenly all your problems begin to look like nails.

Give that man a Klondike bar :)

Sten, CA   August 7th, 2008 4:59 pm ET

Yeah. We believe that!! McCain could barely remember his bearing let alone see into the future that oil prices were gonna go up that's he voted for the war. Hmm, I still believe in the tooth fairy and I will bet I could sell John an ocean front property in Arizona.

Reality Check Richmond Virginia   August 7th, 2008 4:59 pm ET

oil? well at least one of these jerks admits it.

NoMoreRebulicans 08.

Harold   August 7th, 2008 5:00 pm ET

McCain's comment shows that 5+ years in captivity has rendered his brain unuseable. He should seriously consider declining the nomination - or the party should demand he do so-in order to allow a sane person to run on the GOP ticket.

spudmctater   August 7th, 2008 5:00 pm ET

Uh, the war is the reason why prices are so high, you nitwit!

We pre-emptively invaded a country that had not attacked us and destabilized the Middle East.

Does anyone actually think the Iraq war was a GOOD idea? Apparently McCain does!

Ian   August 7th, 2008 5:01 pm ET

So in other words, it's not okay to make billions of dollars from oil revenue?

Jack   August 7th, 2008 5:01 pm ET

What a clown McCain is. Four thousand American lives later, of course the war was about the oil and greed. How does a man runnig for president make a statement like that so proudly. What a shameful old man. McCain would bring four more years of Bush.

biffington, biff   August 7th, 2008 5:01 pm ET

OK. SO NOW… HE "KNEW" THE PRICE OF OIL WOULD SKYROCK AFTER 2003, SO BECAUSE OF THAT, WE WOULD NEED TO GO IN AND TAKE SADDAM OUT..

BECAUSE SENATOR McKARNACK-THE-MAGNIFICENT, KNEW SADDAM WOULD SOON BE RECEIVING AN OIL PROFIT WIND FALL, AND THAT HE 'KNEW" HE WOULD USE IT FOR WMD !!!

Really guys…. really???? 'this' is better than Obama????

really?

McMillan   August 7th, 2008 5:01 pm ET

What a long winding spin to answer a very simple question. What McCain conveniently choses to forget is the fact that if Saddam was in power, the price of oil wouldn't be this high given the oil output on the supply side from stable Iraq.

Hey McCain, you can take your audience for fools but not the rest of us.

Gerry in Virginia   August 7th, 2008 5:01 pm ET

If you think John McOilmanbush, will ever admit he "the maverick" has made a mistake in wanting to go to war, you are ever so mistaken. There are some, and McBush is one of those, who believe it's o.k. to invade a country, kill its leaders and citizens so that they might steal from that country its wealth.. All in the name of democracy. And we wonder why the rest of the world looks at us as tyrants… Our ever so brillient BUSH is in China right now telling the Chinese how to run their government (as though he has done such a fine job here in his own yard). All the while begging for more money from the Chinese so we Americans can keep killing Iraq's country. When will our people and politicans learn to keep their nose out of other countries business and tend to our own problems first… When are we, the Citizens of the United States going to demand our military leave Iraq NOW and for god sakes keep that thug George W. Bush padlocked in the white house until his term is up…..

Sue   August 7th, 2008 5:01 pm ET

Let me get this straight. John McCain is justifying his support of the Iraqi war in 2002 based on what Saddam Hussein would do if he were alive today? That just does not make sense. I think McCain is having another senile moment.

Geoff, LA, CA   August 7th, 2008 5:02 pm ET

I seem to recall that oil was between $40-$50 per barrell BEFORE we invaded. McCain is out of touch with Americans who are not lifelong politicians.

PW, CA   August 7th, 2008 5:03 pm ET

If Saddam were still around we wouldn't be in this mess…..why would it be different now than before we invaded his country? The only reason the prices are so high now is because bush and his gang are purposely keeping certain fields in Iraq shut down allowing no production…..that's why we invaded the country…..he and his buddies wanted control…..is there anyone who has not yet seen the pictures of daddy bush and the sheik?

Bushwhacked in Eugene, OR   August 7th, 2008 5:03 pm ET

What a lame, lame way to spin this! McCain can sputter all he wants, but that war vote is indefensible.

Oil may not have gone so high without the war; we certainly would have spent fewer billions of American dollars on a fruitless effort that has cost untold lives; maybe this, maybe that.

And this may tries to distance himself from the Bush administration? Please — he just can't hide his true colors.

Wayne H   August 7th, 2008 5:04 pm ET

What would the price of oil be today if we didn't enter Iraq? Any educated feedback on that one?

jason   August 7th, 2008 5:04 pm ET

mcshame you are a loser bro oil prices are jumping because your Bush buddy is the one making the prices with EXXON

Ed   August 7th, 2008 5:04 pm ET

If Saddam was still in power, the only person who would benefit from sky-high Iraqi oil is Kofi Annan's son. Guess McCain already forgot the heavy U.N. sanctions in place while Saddam was in power and that the Oil for Food program was the only legitimate way Saddam could get Iraqi oil to market. Saddam had to sell Iraq's oil for pennies on the dollar in return for food and medicine because Kojo Annan ran the most corrupt program in the history of the U.N.

Waaaiit a minute   August 7th, 2008 5:04 pm ET

hmm so why isnt the US attacking Iran then?

Montana is Obama Country   August 7th, 2008 5:04 pm ET

dealing with hypotheticals is all he has..

Bush agrees to 2010 time-horizon

Oil is down

Tire gauges work in reducing daily consumption..

This guy is too OLD tooooo LEAD… even a horse to water..

Ian   August 7th, 2008 5:04 pm ET

When he says that Saddam had aquired WMD twice before, is he referring to the weapons we sold him?

Also, gas didn't go up this high until we invaded Iraq.

Joe Matt   August 7th, 2008 5:04 pm ET

Huh? So he would've voted for a lie because he knew oil would dramatically rise in price. John McCain can "tell you" what Saddam Hussein would do? Is that kinda like how he "knows" how to catch Osama Bin Laden? Is John McCain a psychic? If so, then we definately should elect him to office. On the other hand, if he was a psychic why didn't he cheating on his first wife leading to his divorce. Or why didin't he "know" how to prevent a visit to the Hanoi Hilton? Maybe his psychic powers have grown since then. Sheesh

Charles   August 7th, 2008 5:05 pm ET

So, Mr McCain, using that line of gibberish, if Brittney had not shaved her head and was still in power, do you think she would have a chance of a cabinet post in your administration?

And volunteering your wife for the topless beauty contest in Sturgis???
Nothing is connecting too well for you upstairs these days, is it John? Are you a firetruck today? Or is it biker Thursday? Tapioca Tuesday?

Do you really think that the American public would trust you with all of the important decisions that are going on in our country right now?

Dan, Maryland   August 7th, 2008 5:05 pm ET

Maybe, just maybe…if there wasn't so much turmoil in the middle east (ie Iraq), the prices wouldn't have jumped so high in the first place…McCain, you're a riot, I can't help buy laugh, I miss the McCain of 2000, you know, the respectable guy.

Darin   August 7th, 2008 5:05 pm ET

Gimme a break…..What other "what if's" can this clown shoe babble on about? What if Bush hadn't been elected president? What if the current oil cartel wasn't in Washington? What would the cost of crude be then?

jd   August 7th, 2008 5:05 pm ET

That's taking stupidity to a new lower level. Saddam was limited by the amount of oil he could sell by UN sanctions. None of the price surge would have helped him much. All of the war has helped the dictator of Venezuela, the Iranians and the Russians.

Mad as hell and not going to take it anymore   August 7th, 2008 5:05 pm ET

McCain does not understand … the issue is not whether Saddam should have been toppled = but how it was done — circumventing the Constitution and Lying to the American public should be an impeachable offense (certainly registers higher than what Clinton did) … we would have succeeded in toppling Saddam in other ways (including economic) — but that was not the way that the neo-cons decided to drive this thing … and now there have been probably 500,000 people killed so that Americans can drive Humvies … John - bite me — go back to Phoenix now and just leave us alone!!!!

austin   August 7th, 2008 5:06 pm ET

WHAT!! don't speculate on what he would do. we found no wmd and were so tight on what that country could and couldn't do. he couldn't order a venus fly trap on the internet without someone knowing.

just a crock of bull dung to try and tie todays oil prices, which have gone up drastically with this war, to removing him and his wmd's. wasn't there and oil for food program in place? sell the oil and all they could buy the proceeds was civilian supplies?

Glenn Doty, Columbia, SC   August 7th, 2008 5:06 pm ET

So McCain has finally admitted that we invaded Iraq for oil.

Congrats to him for honesty, even though it's 5 and a half years too late.

As for the effect on the price of oil:
When we invaded, Iraq was pumping out the same volume/day as it is now. During the intervening 5 years, Iraq's output was consistantly lower than before the invasion. The instability that our invasion caused has caused price fluctuations, often increasing the fundamental price of fuel by as much as 30.00/bbl (though right now the additional "security concerns" increase is less than 5.00/bbl.

Since the invasion, Iraq has exported ~4 billion barrels of oil. Our invasion cost 1.6 trillion dollars thus far. Which means that if the invasion was actually about oil (McCain has finally admitted it), the cost of oil from Iraq's military misadventure have cost an additional ~400.00/bbl - before we pay regular market price for them.

Empirial expansion is not a good way to obtain oil. McCain should revert back to lying about this again… the truth just makes him look even more stupid about energy.

Kelvin   August 7th, 2008 5:07 pm ET

So senator McSame by your logic the US should attack the Saudis since they funded the Sept 11th attacks and Bin Laden's family ties are there?!

NICK , WATERTOWN SD   August 7th, 2008 5:07 pm ET

MCSHAME, MCSHAME, YEA AND IF WE HADN'T INVADED IN THE FIRST PLACE WOULD GAS BE 147 $ A BARREL!? NO. WHAT A TOOL MCSAME HAS TURNED OUT TO BE.

Don Child   August 7th, 2008 5:07 pm ET

Um …. isn't the US action in Iraq a big part of the reason for the higher oil prices? We create instability, the price goes up, and McCain blames Sadaam? duh

Bill from ALabama   August 7th, 2008 5:08 pm ET

McCain is telling the truth about the threat Hussein would have been if he were still there garnering today's,price of oil……….there is a big difference.

California Gold   August 7th, 2008 5:08 pm ET

Since Sadam is dead and gone and we are paying through the nose for fuel. Given your rationale Senator McCain, who do you suggest the United States of America next hunt down and kill over the price of oil? Obviously we need to keep murdering until everyone who can raise the cost of oil is dead.

That brings us to the McCain pledge for 100 more years of war.

DAREN IN MIAMI   August 7th, 2008 5:08 pm ET

WAR FOR OIL!!!! OLD MAN JUST TOLD ON HIMSELF!!!!

Jo Ann   August 7th, 2008 5:08 pm ET

McCain is so sick and I am tired of looking and listerning to him-Bush
had Saddam killed so he could try and take the oil what did it do but get a lot of people killed for a lie and oil is still high.

Bill from ALabama   August 7th, 2008 5:08 pm ET

Heck,it looks like I am the only guy caring about your absurdities,CNN.

Kim, Charlotte, NC   August 7th, 2008 5:09 pm ET

So, in other words, we went to war for oil? Or did I miss what he was saying when he spun his answer. This is really sad…over 4100 soldiers are dead because of him and those who voted over a lie to the American people. I hope you all know that McCain will keep over half the staff that G.W. Bush has.

So pathetic……………..

dave   August 7th, 2008 5:09 pm ET

Wow.

So much pandering to do, so little time to do it in.

I had a lot more respect for John McCain a few years ago.

True   August 7th, 2008 5:09 pm ET

All Hypothetical BullShiza! I have one too, John McCain is better off dropping out so the world can be a better place.

Sherry, Atlanta   August 7th, 2008 5:10 pm ET

ARE WE GOING TO 'WAR WITH CHINA', BECAUSE OF CHINA'S HUMAN RIGHT'S VIOLATION.

YOUR A REAL JOKE—MCCAIN

Mark Wagner   August 7th, 2008 5:10 pm ET

Yet another lack of understanding on McCain's part. Considering the price of oil was around $30-$40 when we went into Iraq, how can he say if we didn't go into Iraq oil would be at the price it is now?

Does he not understand that our Middle East policy, especially what we've done in Iraq, has had a big impact in the cost of oil today?

Again, will someone tell me how town halls meetings are where McCain does his best? Do people who report that not watch those town hall meetings? Seems if he gets a question that isn't pre-selected to match his current policies, his answers are always so ignorant.

JoeJ   August 7th, 2008 5:10 pm ET

Does this guy really think that we'd be dealing with oil at $120, $125, $130 a barrel if it weren't for his war?

Veterans for Obama   August 7th, 2008 5:10 pm ET

war-monger!

JulesT   August 7th, 2008 5:11 pm ET

Finally the truth, we went to war over oil. All those lives lost, and for what? It has done no good. Wish McCain would stop insulting our intelligence.

Matt from NYC   August 7th, 2008 5:11 pm ET

Or… if we had never gone in… and the Iraqi resistance hadn't blown up most of the Oil production devices, and therefor cut the supply from Iraq, and caused billions of dollars in reconstruction….

MAYBE OIL WOULDNT BE 125 BUCKS A BARREL YOU SHMUCK

Jean, CANADA   August 7th, 2008 5:11 pm ET

So you are finally admitig that the only "plausible" reason for invading Iraq is because we didn't wan't them to have access to the large amounts of Oil stored in THEIR "Sovereign" lands…..??!!!! After the enormous death toll (US, Allies and Iraq's)……this is all about OIL??!!!!

THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION SHOULD BE TRIED for TREASON!!!!

Marlon   August 7th, 2008 5:11 pm ET

Yeah, I'd much rather have a backwater dictator whose country is under all sorts of economic and trade sanctions than U.S. oil companies who get a free ride from the government and have Americans by the balls in control of Iraqi oil. People don't seem to understand that American oil companies don't care about the pain of American consumers any more than Saddam Hussein, AND they have much more power to raise prices. Oil probably wouldn't be AT $120 a barrel if we hadn't invaded Iraq.

Now he's trying to use the same old Iraq scare tactics that got us into this misguided war in RETROSPECT? God, McCain is so dumb! How dumb does he think we are? It makes me so mad!

JB   August 7th, 2008 5:11 pm ET

Iraq was being embargoed. He wouldn't be getting that money.

You are confused, old man.

dona   August 7th, 2008 5:12 pm ET

We already knew this. Please, please give McCain the news coverage he is whining about!!!! America needs to see the real McBush!!! Let the media fawn on him for a while. At least, America will begin to be informed at his "oil hungry-warmongering" ways!!!

Selah Brown   August 7th, 2008 5:12 pm ET

At last someone is telling the truth - this war has ALWAYS been about oil…from the very beginning. This is why is it is vital that we rid ourselves of our dependancy on foreign oil, and oil period. Than no one ever has to die or kill for oil again.

Rus   August 7th, 2008 5:12 pm ET

Even if this premise made any sense (e.g. no WMD ever found), who says the price would have ever gotten this high without the Iraq war?

Farrell, Houston, Tx   August 7th, 2008 5:12 pm ET

McCain is a total nut case. Saddam never controlled oil pricing, OPEC did when Saddam was alive and OPEC still does. McCain needs a history lesson on the middle east and stop using lies and fear that only tells informed people how misinformed he is.

BWJ   August 7th, 2008 5:13 pm ET

If Saddam were still isolated and contained as he was when we invaded Iraq, the price of oil would likely still be stable and McCain's fear-mongering would be even more laughable than it is in this story.

citizen   August 7th, 2008 5:13 pm ET

I thought we had sanctions and Iraq could only use their oil for food? Or was that not the case!!!! So how exactly was he going to be making the big bucks?

jesse   August 7th, 2008 5:13 pm ET

Wow! These republicans are actually scientists! They had discovered the time machine in 2002 and traveled in 2008 to see how high the oil prices would be and how many weapons saddamm hussain would be making in 2008!

That's why they attacked Iraq, but had a difficult time explaining their action since they weren't allowed to disclose about the time machines….

Bunch of fanatics……

eli   August 7th, 2008 5:14 pm ET

Right on, John! Let's invade Iran too! And Saudi-Arabia, since al the 9/11 hijackers came from that country! Keep 'em coming…"bomb, bomb, bomb Iran." "100 years in Iraq"

The Truth   August 7th, 2008 5:14 pm ET

The cause of the Iraq War was Oil period! McCain and Bush say repeatedly that we are getting oil from a part of the world that does not like us very much. With rising demand for oil in the rest of the world (Russia, China, India), those countries would reach a point where they would not have to sale oil to us. That would have destroyed our economy. I am sure the Oil executives briefed Bush on this threat very early on in his presidency. The Bush administration felt that they had to install a government that was friendly to the United States and would continue to sale us oil at a reasonable price. I think that was the rationale for going to war. Sounds logical, right? Iraq was just the easiest target for the installation of a U.S. friendly government (We basically dismantled their military during and after the first gulf war, they had a crazy dictator nobody liked, and they were under U.N. sanctions). We invaded them expecting that their people would love us for doing so. However, they were not happy with our presence and we dismantled their military and police force which created a law enforcement void that Al Queda exploited. This is what happened folks and I strongly believe that those that think otherwise are foolish.

Ryan   August 7th, 2008 5:14 pm ET

What a doofus….how can anyone vote for this clown? After all that's happened he still clings to the WMD theory. How can someone be so out of touch.

deb   August 7th, 2008 5:14 pm ET

So McCain thinks this is a good reason to go to war and lose over 4,00 Americans lives with untold hardship for injured vets and the families of all servicemen not to mention a million Iraquis killed, many children? For oil? So spending billions each month in Iraq somehow off sets his view about the expense of increased oil if we were not invading such a country? Where is this logic when he voted against all the recent bills that would have supported new energy sources like wind power? So going to war for oil is OK with him? Wake up people, if he wins we will invade Iran, Pakistan, you name it. We will be a broken nation with no army left and ruined finances. Thats how Al Q. will win.

Out with McWar   August 7th, 2008 5:14 pm ET

Well who do you think has been holding the money bag for the last almost 8 years after invading Iraq for not one reason just a pack of made up lies to frighten citizens ?The crooks that come to mind Bush,Cheney , G raham, Rove, McWar ,Haliburton and the list goes on and on.
McWar
Get your your story straight before you open your Frog mouth then grin like one.
We are fed up with your made up lies you no doubt have Buffalo chips in your head .

Peter (CA)   August 7th, 2008 5:15 pm ET

How sad Sen. McCain has become. It's the instability in the Middle East that has led to this gouging. If Saddam (yes, a brutual dictator but one of many) was still in power, more stability in the Middle East could have led to the oil flowing more freely. Prices may not even have jumped. We no longer have any way of knowing but it is a ridiculous stretch for McCain to come up with this.

Kim   August 7th, 2008 5:15 pm ET

Is this McBush's confession that the Iraq war is all about oil?

Travis   August 7th, 2008 5:15 pm ET

That a boy McWar…..WMD…….are you ever stuck in neutral.

McWar got caught with his pants down with this question and he

blurbed what he was programmed to say……but guess what McWar

I'm going to watch it again, and I'm sure you probably said the war was

over OIL.

Raymond K Hessel   August 7th, 2008 5:16 pm ET

Ultimately, McCain concluded, “If he were still in power, I believe that the world would be far worse off, especially with all the money he’d be making off of oil.”

Oh. As opposed to say all those oil corps I guess. Yes, I feel much better now.

When are we going to Venezuela and Iran? You gotta love McWar and his rationales.

DJ Los Angeles   August 7th, 2008 5:16 pm ET

McCain is a pathological liar just like Bush and Cheney.

jeff   August 7th, 2008 5:16 pm ET

What McCain fails to acknowledge publicly is that one of the main reasons oil prices are so high is because of the invasion of Iraq. He knows this though and hopes to continue talking about paris hilton so the american people are distracted from the mess him and the rest of the rubber stamp republicans have gotten us into

CB   August 7th, 2008 5:16 pm ET

Does he really think Americans are that stupid? The price of oil was half of what it was today BEFORE THE WAR. Everybody knows the Bush/Cheney war has caused the price of oil to rise.

CB   August 7th, 2008 5:16 pm ET

You still never answer the question.

Adam, Plano, TX   August 7th, 2008 5:17 pm ET

really mccain? you don't think that if we had never gone to Iraq, oil prices would have never gone so high? you're completely out of touch.

Brenda   August 7th, 2008 5:17 pm ET

This guy is too old.. thats it too old… plus looking more and more senile…

gary   August 7th, 2008 5:18 pm ET

YOUR PROBABLY RIGHT JOHN. GOOD THING SADAM IS OUT OF THE PICTURE.

AML31   August 7th, 2008 5:18 pm ET

If McCain had supported alternative energy over the last 26 years, we wouldn't have needed foreign oil and we wouldn't be a trillion dollars in debt and would't have lost 4000 American lives. What a " little jerk" to coin one of his idiotic expressions.

Mike   August 7th, 2008 5:18 pm ET

I wonder if mcOil really is this stupid or he just thinks we are that stupid. The Iraq war caused the high oil prices you dangerous, crazy old man.

Mark Webb   August 7th, 2008 5:19 pm ET

Kerry was right: this guy is really dangerous!!!!
4000 boys killed for big oil, and he has no regrets???
Shameful!!!!!!

kayla   August 7th, 2008 5:19 pm ET

mcsame has no substance. his only words in his vocabulary is WAR AND SURGE. and to attack sen. obama. so that americans don't see his lack of substance. wait for the debate.

McCain:SmallWeakCowardlyMan OffersMoreOfTheSame TearsOthersDownToBuildHimselfUp   August 7th, 2008 5:19 pm ET

Yep, JohnnyMac, it was about oil all the time, and you've lied the whole time and changed your tune with every note sung by the lyin', cheatin' Bush administration. Thanks for all the "straight talk" you dried up, old, geriatric mess.

lovable liberal   August 7th, 2008 5:19 pm ET

Johnny, this might be slightly plausible if you had, y'know, said ANYTHING like this in real time. Here you go rewriting history again. This is really a stupid rationale.

Terry, Butte, Mt   August 7th, 2008 5:20 pm ET

Obama should have a field day with this one.

Rita of Dallas   August 7th, 2008 5:20 pm ET

He is really reaching. Yes Saddam used chemical weapons on his own people. I wonder where he got the material to make them. And this was over 20 years ago. Why didn't the US do something then? Bush and his cronies wanted this war and the Congress allowed it to happen. Shame on them

DonnieJ   August 7th, 2008 5:20 pm ET

Would oil be at $120, $125, $130 a barrel if we never invaded Iraq, John?

Steve   August 7th, 2008 5:21 pm ET

OMG. Another Republican falsehood to take us to war. What is it going to take to get these war mongers out of office?

Dan   August 7th, 2008 5:21 pm ET

Booo. Did we scare you?

OBAMA RICHARDSON 2008   August 7th, 2008 5:21 pm ET

Sounds like some PURE speculation that is highly unlikely since it's been proven that Sadaam was nowhere near any kind of real development of WMDs. You can't punish someone for something they didn't do but in theory may be capable of doing 5 years in the future if oil prices shoot up to $130 a barrell.

Bob, San Francisco, CA   August 7th, 2008 5:21 pm ET

Nevermind the fact that the turmoil in the Mideast created by Bush's policies and the war is largely responsible for the current price of oil.

Rob   August 7th, 2008 5:21 pm ET

Saddam was always opposed to radical Islam. The Iraq war brought Al Queada to Iraq. The war was and is stupid, wasteful and criminal. Only McBush is crazy enough to not see this.

Justin (ny)   August 7th, 2008 5:21 pm ET

EVERYBODY RUN FOR YOUR LIVES - UNLESS MCCAIN IS ELECTED THE WHOLE WORLD IS DOOOOOOMED

BE SCARED OF ANYBODY BUT MCCAIN

Luke   August 7th, 2008 5:22 pm ET

We knew the war was about oil all along anyway.

Justin (ny)   August 7th, 2008 5:22 pm ET

EVERYBODY RUN FOR YOUR LIVES - UNLESS MCCAIN IS ELECTED THE WHOLE WORLD IS DOOOOOOMED

BE SCARED OF ANYBODY BUT MCCAIN

thats pretty much what the rethuglican argument is these days

FEAR FEAR FEAR FEAR

IT WON'T WORK THIS TIME

OBAMA 08

skunkrat The Marine   August 7th, 2008 5:22 pm ET

McCain is one STUPID man, now he is using hypotheticals to justify this illegal war. Dose he ever stop talking about war? Did anyone suggest to him that if we had not started this ILLEGAL WAR , then maybe oil would be $60.00 a barrel.

Hiram   August 7th, 2008 5:22 pm ET

If I were the Obama team I would be pouncing on McCain's comments until next week. What a moron? He should really keep his comments to a minimum until the debates if he really wants to win.

Nicki   August 7th, 2008 5:22 pm ET

So I guess he just told us we went to war for oil. Thanks for getting this out there CNN.

Phong Nguyen   August 7th, 2008 5:22 pm ET

If the US can help stabilize Iraq and establish a pro-US democracy there successfully, President Bush can score a big one in history!

Nora   August 7th, 2008 5:23 pm ET

Does he think Americans are idiots ? Maybe ( Rs. ) ?

Larry, Apex, North Carolina   August 7th, 2008 5:23 pm ET

This guy is an idiot.

Tecki   August 7th, 2008 5:23 pm ET

This is absurd. "You see, if we hadn't invaded Iraq, then, uh, gas prices would be high."

Is McCain getting desperate? Oh, and I thought w