August 26, 2008
Posted: 09:36 AM ET

From
Vets for Freedom will air a new ad Wednesday, 'I am the Surge'.
Vets for Freedom will air a new ad Wednesday, 'I am the Surge'.

(CNN) — Vets for Freedom, a group of Iraq and Afghan combat veterans, is urging Sen. Barack Obama to acknowledge success of the surge in Iraq in a new ad airing Wednesday.

“Senator Barack Obama credits the improvements in Iraq to anything but the surge,” says Sgt. Gabriel Herrera.

“But, I know the surge worked. I was there,” Travis Quinlan adds.

The “surge” refers to President Bush’s decision to send an additional 30,000 troops into Iraq beginning in January of 2007. The presumed Republican presidential nominee, Sen. John McCain, was a strong supporter of the president’s decision to send more troops to Iraq.

CNN Election Center: Where do the candidates stand on Iraq?

The 30-second spot, “I am the Surge,” will begin airing in Denver, the site Democratic National Convention. The Democrats’ theme Wednesday night is “Securing America’s Future,” and they plan a salute to the nation’s veterans that evening.

The featured vets urge Obama, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, to follow the lead of fellow Sens. Joe Lieberman and Lindsay Graham and cite a resolution the pair put forth which recognizes the success of the surge overseas.

“So call Senator Obama,” Herrera says, “and tell him to support our success by supporting Senate Resolution 636.”

Vets for Freedom will spend $1.1 million dollars to run the ad for four weeks according to a press release. After airing for a week in Denver, the spot will run for a week in Minneapolis, Ohio, Michigan and Colorado.

Filed under: Barack Obama • John McCain


Pick Me! Pick Me!   August 26th, 2008 11:25 am ET

They should have used the $1.1 million to help their fellow veterans with their rehab.

What a waste of money. They should know better.

Greg Pottstown, Pa.   August 26th, 2008 11:23 am ET

Do you trust Obama, McCain or the vets that were in Iraq. If you say the vets then you also trust McCain.

Kevin   August 26th, 2008 11:22 am ET

To all those who are blaming McCain for his vote to "invade" Iraq, you need to start adding your VP noms name in the mix. Biden voted for it to. Change you can't believe in.

Dave   August 26th, 2008 11:22 am ET

If the surge worked, why are we still there, getting more troops blown up daily? And if these vets support McCain, why has McCain consistently voted to cut their pay and benefits? John McCain only TALKS about supporting our troops; when it comes time to actually DO something to back those words up, he falls short every single time. If people will actually look into McCain's record instead of just listening to his rhetoric, they'll find out who's really an empty suit in this race.

Chryssa   August 26th, 2008 11:21 am ET

I don't know how ANY vet could be for McCain. Republicans are happy to send them to war, then act like they've never heard of them when the return home and need help. This isn't about the surge - it's about vets being able to live normal, healthy lives after war. And so far, that doesn't happen often enough.

WordsMatter   August 26th, 2008 11:21 am ET

As a 29 year navy vet, I can tell you that the military and vets will vote 85 percent for McCain. Why? Because we were successful in Iraq because of the surge and McCain is a big reason why the surge was put in place. McCain had the courage to support the surge and he will reap the benefit of such courage.

angus   August 26th, 2008 11:19 am ET

Saint Obama refuses to face reality once again…..Imagine that

SCvoter   August 26th, 2008 11:18 am ET

CNN, why is this story at the top of your politics page? Is it really the top story of the day? Please start earning the moniker you've given yourselves. Try BEING the best news team in the business. Make the tough calls. What would Murrow say?

Carrie Goodeagle Hayden, Idaho   August 26th, 2008 11:18 am ET

Impeach Bush and Cheney, they both lied. Don't deny it. What about Scott McClellan the once-upon-a-time Press Secretary, is he lying about the liars?

Mark-Virginia Beach   August 26th, 2008 11:18 am ET

Funny how this "resolution" comes just before the elections and is sponsored by Lieberman and Graham, two fixtures on John McCain's backside constently. If anyone actually listened to Senator Obamas comments about the surge, he certainly DOES acknowledge the impact of the surge ALONG with many other factors.
The sad part is that the surge has been successful, much in part by the $$ we have been giving to the militias NOT to attack us. Sounds like paying the mob for protection. stop the gravy trainin and see how quickly the violence will surge..

mike   August 26th, 2008 11:17 am ET

we have to have a resolution that pat's ourselves on the back???

pannie   August 26th, 2008 11:17 am ET

yawn

Eric Jack   August 26th, 2008 11:16 am ET

Just this week Gen. Petreaus acknowledged that the Sunni Awakening had a greater significance and started before the surge! The surge still has not rectified the political conditions in Iraq! Yet when will these vet groups condemn our ever going to war!

Tom L   August 26th, 2008 11:16 am ET

The recent gains in Iraq, whether caused by surge or not, show that in fact the Iraq operation WAS the right way to go. Huge gamble on the part of Bush, in which he defied half his nation, and the rest of the world, to give a real shocking wake-up call to the Arab world post 9-11. And now, guess what, his gamble and his faith in the ability of the US military to pull it off, has succeeded.

Bush can now retire from office knowing that he did the right thing, and that he made the world a very significantly safer place for the future. And that the liberal's gloom and doomsaying was wrong, wrong, wrong!

That's the REAL message that Democrats and liberals are so terribly unwilling to face, and so therefore so afraid of.

Minneapolis   August 26th, 2008 11:16 am ET

We won't fall for these tactics from Democrats OR Republicans.

We loved Ron Paul's ideals of limited government…Now we will vote for Bob Barr because he is the only candidate in a political party that stands for what we do. Limited government: individual rights (be gay or not), abortion (have one or not –but don't let the government get involved.), lower taxes, get out of Iraq and Afghanistan–and for that matter Japan, Germany, UK, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait….! Only Barr is campaigning on these issues.

the others have a messed up mish-mash of conflicting messages.
How can dems say "hands off my body" then force government programs for healthcare, welfare…?
How can repubs say "limited government" then occupy most of the countries on the planet? with you and I footing the bill?

Go Libertarians!!

Ron L   August 26th, 2008 11:16 am ET

These people need to hear the WHOLE context of Baracks answer in regards to the surge. He has never said it did not work, he has said there are additional events that occurred to supplement it's success. By the way if it were so successful why don't we have 10,000 to 20,000 fewer troops in there than before the surge. The last I heard we still have not reduce troop levels below what we had in Iraq before the surge began. This smoke and mirror definition of SUCCESS is an insult to all of us.

eye's of the wise   August 26th, 2008 11:16 am ET

THE G.I BILL WORKED !!!

ClintonDem4Cynthia08   August 26th, 2008 11:15 am ET

Thank goodness for the demise of the Democratic party. Because of the splintering, and bad blood we have been able to increase our numbers by the thousands. 2008 will be the year of the Green Party. Dems and Repubs are past tense now.

Joe   August 26th, 2008 11:15 am ET

umm? Should we burn house, so we can say water put out house? Or just not burn house? What to do? What to do?

Farrell, Houston, Tx   August 26th, 2008 11:15 am ET

Republicans like John McCain measures what works by the number of U.S. soldiers that weren't killed in Iraq. I detest anyone who uses the blood of soldiers as a measure of success. One American soldiers life is one too many and remember we have lost over 4,000 American men and women and still counting. Have we forgotten our soldiers died in a war that was based on lies and failures of the Bush administration and McCain. Now Bush is agreeing to a timetable that McCain doesn't want and it doesn't take a genius to figure that one out. McCain has nothing going for himself but to attempt to keep a war going and that isn't going to help our economy.

Eddie   August 26th, 2008 11:14 am ET

Freedoom is not free. Obama wants to make forced servitdue, against the constitution. Not help others to be free. He wants to provide the world everything and americans pay for it per his push for more money to the U.N. Health care for the illegals ? It looks like anti-american liberal leftist??? Tax and spend???

Patricia   August 26th, 2008 11:14 am ET

The vets of the surge deserve credit for what they did, but this article makes it sound like all those who died and fought before and after the surge were not as important. My daughter served in Iraq, I have an investment in this war also. And I am glad that there are a lot of veteran's for Obama - she is one of them. She sees the "big picture" that includes ALL of the factors that resulted in the progress that has been made. Plus Obama is in favor of reasonable withdrawal with a deadline. Iraq wants that and even Bush/Rice are starting that conversation.

jimmy   August 26th, 2008 11:14 am ET

THE TRUE AMERICAN PATRIOTS ARE THE ONES WHO PUT THEIR LIVES ON THE LINE FOR OUR GREAT COUNTRY. MCCAIN WAS IN THE FRONT LINES AS A FIGHTER PILOT AND THEN ENDURED 5 YEARS AS A POW. IT IS IN HIS FAMILY' TRADITION TO JOIN THE ARMED FORCES IN DEFENCE OF OUR COUNTRY. HE EVEN HAS A SON SERVING IN IRAQ. MCCAIN ALSO HAS MORE EXPERIENCE AND JUDGEMENT TO BE COMMANDER IN CHIEF. COMPARE ALL THIS WITH OBAMA'S CREDENTIALS AND YOU HAVE TO BE AN IDIOT
NOT TO KNOW THE DIFFERENCE. OF COURSE IF YOU THINK PUTTING YOUR LIFE ON THE LINE FOR OUR GREAT COUNTRY
MEANS NOTHING TO YOU, YOU ARE PROBABLY AN IMMIGRANT
AND DONT YET KNOW WHAT AMERICA IS ALL ABOUT AND THAT AMERICANS ARE PATRIOTIC .

Ken in Dallas   August 26th, 2008 11:14 am ET

First of all, it's stupid to let the Republican propaganda machin hijack the English language AGAIN. "Surge" is a brand name for what the Republicans don't want to call what it is, an escalation. "Troop surge" is a sickening euphemism.

Obama has repeatedly acknowledged that a troop escalation has yielded a tactical advantage, and McCain ignores those acknowledgments to hang on to his excuse for beating that drum. McCain further lectures us about the fragility of progress, ignoring the obvious implication that "fragility" means that the escalation has yielded ONLY tactical advantage, not strategic progress.

You could say McCain's half right about the war: escalation wins battles. What he denies is that the escalation hasn't settled anything, that it hasn't worked strategically. Anything but the facts, ma'am, ANYTHING BUT THE FACTS.

Chesapeake, Va   August 26th, 2008 11:14 am ET

How many more did they see die because of the surge?

thomas   August 26th, 2008 11:14 am ET

The surge reduced the rate at which Americans are dying on foreign soil. Americans are still dying in on foreign soil. If that is success then pat yourself on the back. The point is that when America has lost so much, do you stil think you're winning?

larry King Live   August 26th, 2008 11:14 am ET

Why is the media making Obama look like world leader the max people to his rally has been around 70000 + look at this link below a new party formed in india the guy as 1 million + people come to see him now thats a world leader ….what you think folks…

http://www.ibnlive.com/photogallery/933-12.html#view_start

Floridian for Obama   August 26th, 2008 11:13 am ET

Three of my family members have been killed in this war. So you tell me if it's working. I my eyes, I just cant see it when I visit my cousins graves. All of whom were under the age of 25.

Cynthia   August 26th, 2008 11:13 am ET

I guess those veterans making the commerical already have their benefits and are not worrying about the one that are serving in the military currently. Wow, how selfish.

Independent American for McCain   August 26th, 2008 11:12 am ET

Independent Latino for Obama:

You sir are an idiot. Has the surge worked…absolutely..I would rather see us spending money on the war in Iraq to attempt to put some stabilizing effect in the Middle East than to spend it on burying folks from another attack on American soil. Since our courageous troops has gone to Afghanistan and Iraq how many planes have been flown into buildings in the U.S.? I agree Bush has made some decisions I did not like, but our government was originally founded for common defense against our enemies and that is what we are accomplishing. I want to get out of Iraq, I want our soldiers back home, everyone does. We have to stay and finish the job. God Bless the greatest country on earth ( even though some think we are mean).

Earl   August 26th, 2008 11:12 am ET

These vets for freedom are smucks. I'm sure they all have good paying jobs, good health care benifits and have the community support of the republican community at thier side. What is amazing is that if one is so pro kill the bad guy, why is it that we have over 7000 Americans 6 feet under and Bid Ladin free. Bush has had at least 7 years and more than 150,000 military personel with a united international community to begin with. Vets for freedom if they are so politically concerned about what is good and what is right, why are they so new on the sceen. What they are now are Black Water employees.

Carmon Minneapolis MN   August 26th, 2008 11:11 am ET

I'm so sick of these toy solders playing this political game. Are you solders or are you running for office. I’m mean seriously some of these guys are just plain dumb if they think they are the ones keeping the violence under control. NO. The money our government is paying these terrorist is keeping the violence down. They act like just because they have been over there they know every thing that’s going on when in fact our whole country is being played like fools by the Republicans and there fake war on terror in Iraq. Yeah there may be some soldiers over there for McCain but most of them want to come home so that’s why they support Barrak. All of these soldiers for McCain are so quick to jump on the bandwagon on how Barrak is not giving all the credit to the surge but what did they have to say when McCain wanted to keep the war going for as long as he could maybe even 100 years and now that the Iraqi people have wanted us out of there country NOW ALL OF A SUDDEN McCain supports a withdrawal date. HE IS So Fake and so are these so called veterans for McCain. Of course they support McCain they are out of harms way now. But people like my brother are still over there. You fake vets need to get over yourselves and stop pushing this political BULL, and if you think the surge is so great why don’t you go back over there and fight so that my love ones can come home. I will pray for you.

Eric   August 26th, 2008 11:11 am ET

This surge talk is ridiculous. If you rob my house should I pat you on the back because you wiped your feet first? We should not have been in Iraq in the first place. Any veteran who bothers to read the record also knows that Sen. Obama has supported service members and veterans more than Sen. McCain on pay, health care, housing, and education.

Donna from Colorado Springs   August 26th, 2008 11:08 am ET

I wonder how McBush found some veterans he could buy off to say nasty things about Obama? Sounds suspiciously like the way Bush swift boated John Kerry, doesn't it?

Zman   August 26th, 2008 11:07 am ET

Yes the surge worked if you can recognize and admit that we should not have been there in first place.

Pam   August 26th, 2008 11:06 am ET

Do these veterans know McCain voted against the bill expanding benefits for veterans?

The Duke   August 26th, 2008 11:03 am ET

If it is working we are we losing so many live and the debt keeps getting higher each day. If the legislature was fully aware of the success then why don't they take their retirement funds and use it to fund the surge?

Mickey the Fish   August 26th, 2008 11:03 am ET

Who cares if the surge worked? The point is, we shouldn't have been there in the first place. Obama is losing focus by not driving this point home.

Ian   August 26th, 2008 11:03 am ET

The surge DIDN'T work. It quelled the violence but DID NOT bring the political reconciliation. The surge was a complete FAILURE.

Joe in StL   August 26th, 2008 11:02 am ET

Republican veterans: "Boo!"

Scared yet?

Lacy   August 26th, 2008 11:02 am ET

Veterens should think long and hard before trying to tear down Obama. Afterall, John McCain voted against increasing veterens benefits "because there'd be less incentive to stay in the military"

LeRoy   August 26th, 2008 11:02 am ET

Just another Swift Boat group tactic.

Upon Further Review   August 26th, 2008 11:01 am ET

Sure it worked, PAYOFF MONEY ALWAYS WORKS.Some of these people were given more money a week than we make in a month.Where do you think all that missing cash went.Things will get ugly as soon as they use all that money to buy new supplies.

Gerald F.   August 26th, 2008 11:01 am ET

No surprise that Senator Obama is taking this position. Remember he was also claiming the Russian military stopped fighting because he "Asked Them To" as well????????????????????????????

Travis   August 26th, 2008 10:59 am ET

This should be a fair trade

McWar admit that it was wrong to go into Iraq for oil

Obama admits the surge worked.

Wes   August 26th, 2008 10:59 am ET

Our troops are 6 to 1 for Obama. Yeah, the surge for Obama is working.

Michael "C" Lorton, Virginia   August 26th, 2008 10:58 am ET

You know, if you send enough troops in the beginning, the mission is easier to accomplished……and if you need additional troops…….just send them……but please get off this kick of of the word "surge,"…..please…….

Q   August 26th, 2008 10:55 am ET

Have the American Standards fallen so low that sending more troops to quell violence which George Bush and John McCain so senselessly started now a definition of success?

Pathetic!

Edwin   August 26th, 2008 10:55 am ET

Oh great, it's 2004 all over again with the manipulable sheep falling for the Republican terror machine.

STOP SCARING AMERICANS INTO AGREEING WITH YOUR AGENDA!

bob   August 26th, 2008 10:54 am ET

great the surge worked…the war is over…the troops can come home!

Joe   August 26th, 2008 10:54 am ET

More swift boat politics.Why do you think that the majority of the military is for Obama?They would like to be thought of as more than just sand bags to stop bullets. When the GOP says work hard and you can be rich like me, well don`t you think these guy`s work hard? There just dieing to make you rich. READ MY LIPS NO MORE WAR!!!

Ms. D   August 26th, 2008 10:53 am ET

Cnn,

I wish you will let us comment about James Carsville comments!! He is so negative.

Obamalism   August 26th, 2008 10:53 am ET

The tribal uprising and suni partnership WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN POSSIBLE IF NOT FOR THE SURGE.

Joe   August 26th, 2008 10:52 am ET

If Obama thought it worked, he should have said Yes, instead of coming up with some wishy-washy answers?

Dana from Chi   August 26th, 2008 10:51 am ET

Of course a surge will work for a litttle time. But like Obama said it takes political works too. If one group don't agree to come together on certain issues, it will be right back at fighting!! You can't solve a political issue entirely with just fighting!!

Lisa   August 26th, 2008 10:50 am ET

As a former US soldier, this soldier only knows the Military aspect of the surge. I suggest this soldier look at the surge from all sides, not just a combat one. huahhh

anon   August 26th, 2008 10:49 am ET

man, I wonder how many people bashing these vets are vets themselves.

The surge worked! Why can't Obama admit it? We have had a President for 8 years who refused to admit he was wrong. Do we need another?

Mad as a mother.....Dem   August 26th, 2008 10:48 am ET

How can I acknowledge the success of a mistake? This is what I was say if I were the democratic presumptive nominee.

Yes we can!   August 26th, 2008 10:48 am ET

Another Swift boat attempt to discredit a democrat. I hope they don't take this one lying down. It is time for Democrats to stand up strong against the Republican attacks.

Jean   August 26th, 2008 10:48 am ET

I am surprise that McCain seems to get so much traction on the idea of the working of the surge. The fact that we were there and are still there in large numbers is drowned out by this constant drum beat.
Do we want to, or better yet do they want us there forever? Do we want our families to get some relief from the burden of fighting?
We need to move toward progress and what is better for all.

karen - Missouri   August 26th, 2008 10:47 am ET

So why don't you report on the Vietnam Veterans and Iraq veterans who are campaigning AGAINST McCain…they have been ever since primaries. Their website is good. But then, we ALL know CNN doesn't report news…just does McCain's work for free.

TESAP; SAVANNAH, GA   August 26th, 2008 10:47 am ET

THE SURGE WORKED??? SO WHERE IS THE VICTORY???

POST……THIS………….

Paul   August 26th, 2008 10:46 am ET

The analysis I have heard is that it was not as much the surge as the putting local militias on the payroll that brought about the declines in violence. What happens when the money runs out?

Mike D   August 26th, 2008 10:46 am ET

if this "veterans" group wanted to actually HELP the troops, they should have used the money to get the troops ARMOR and SUPPLIES so they don't GET KILLED!
what a joke.

ThinkSmart   August 26th, 2008 10:44 am ET

I was part of the surge too. We were briefed if we did an outstanding job it will give room for political gains and the likelyhood of us going back will decrease. We did everything we were suppose to do but it didnt help. I feel like I went back over tehre for nothing, I wish I could meet the soldiers in this video. I bet the never left the wire. Overall the surge did not work!!! The military always completed our missions

Anonymous   August 26th, 2008 10:42 am ET

I thought the military was not supposed to be used for political purposes.

bernj   August 26th, 2008 10:39 am ET

McCain has PTSD and the media knows it but will not report on it. Come on CNN. Do your job.

This is just another Swithboat attack. Some old neocon games. It will not work this time.

Rob Vukovic   August 26th, 2008 10:38 am ET

A noun a verb, the surge, POW! Is that all there is Sen McCain?

John in Ohio   August 26th, 2008 10:38 am ET

I'm a disabled Iraq war vet for Obama.

Silken   August 26th, 2008 10:38 am ET

I guess you can consider it has worked IF you call bribing one faction
of muslims NOT to kill the other with american tax payers money!!!
I say get the troops out, they are burn out from repeated tours and their familes are paying the price !
If the muslims do not have enough respect for one another than to kill
each other well so be it!!
Lets not forget it was an ilegal war based on false proganda and BIG
OIL for BUSH Cheney and McBush

This We'll Defend   August 26th, 2008 10:38 am ET

Of course the surge is working. We're paying the capricious warlords millions of dollars to not shoot at us.

B. Thompson   August 26th, 2008 10:38 am ET

Everyone knows that Rumsfeld short changed the troops from the beginning. The surge was actually the additional troops that were needed all along. If you were there, you should know this.

KATHLEEN   August 26th, 2008 10:37 am ET

What a story!!!! How many verterans actually took aim at Obama?
How many hundreds of Veterans are for Obama? Thousands.
Please it is of ultimate importance that you stop "soundbiting"
your CNN stories.

I was feeling like it was maybe true that last nights "first night"
conventions was "wasted' until Kennedy's and Michelle spoke.

Then later in the evening, I watched the real coverage, with no
speaker being cut off by cameras and then the coverage became
all about Wolf and others Cnn commentatory. The real coverage
with no interuptions on stage was on C-Span. What a difference
in the messages ALL of the speakers had. It became clear that
too much that was happening on stage was cut off by CNN.

Larry King negative show with Ben Stein and Reagan IMMEDIATELY
after the Positive Convention was a JOKE. Terrible Coverage for
what should have been a positive night for all Democrats. CNN
stole their/our thunder.

James Carville's negative comments about Michelle were atrocious.Michelle was absolutely beautiful and delivered a
perfect speech.

USMC 68-71   August 26th, 2008 10:37 am ET

I AM a Veteran and I support Barack Obama.

McCain is no friend of ours. He's great at finding ways to get into wars, he's great at flip-flopping on TORTURE, and terrible at supporting Vets after they come back.

Obama supports the Vets. McCain doesn't.

NO to McCain. YES to Obama!

StuCop   August 26th, 2008 10:36 am ET

The surge in pay-offs and bribes to the Sunni's worked…huge sums of American Taxpayer's dollars going to bribe Sunni insurgents…and also allow them to buy weapons…we funded and armed insurgents and terrorist…and paid them not to fight…that's what worked…and that's what will fall apart and is falling apart now and the surge will fail as it was destined to from the start…

Terry, Dallas Texas   August 26th, 2008 10:36 am ET

Hey surge vets!
How are you enjoying that GI benefits bill? You know the one that McCain REFUSED to vote yes to? He must be so grateful for your service to our country.

Democrat   August 26th, 2008 10:35 am ET

They need to come out hard promoting Obama and discrediting McSame and his lies. DO NOT fall for swift- boating. Repukes play dirty, you play dirtier. We just talking about the future of America. Do not let McBush continue Bushs' ways 4 more years.

Sam   August 26th, 2008 10:35 am ET

How much did they pay some of those teenagers to appear on this AD?

I served 8 years in the U.S. Military (got out in 2007) and I have never seen anybody that young who cares about the surge or the success of our military in Iriq. All the young kids care about is their rotation of duty. they wanna be out of Iriq. So, STOP TWISTING THE TRUTH.

Tim, mississippi   August 26th, 2008 10:34 am ET

SURGE WORKED, THAT'S WHY WE NEED TO STAY IN IRAQ, IN CASE IT FAILS AGAIN.

Jatovi, NC   August 26th, 2008 10:34 am ET

Swift Boat anyone? The right wing needs to be more creative.

Independent, Georgia   August 26th, 2008 10:34 am ET

If we can get McBush to admit that he was wrong about going into Iraq in the first place, that he was lied to by Bush and his cronies, then I might listen to his whining about the surge working. There shouldn't have been a war, there shouldn't have been a surge, we shouldn't have spent all this money and killed all these people - US soldiers and the many, many civilians…

cheryl (RETIRED VETS FOR OBAMA)   August 26th, 2008 10:33 am ET

It is ashame that some Vets refuse to adknowledge that McCain was wrong on voting for the Iraq war, do they not understand that we lost over 4000 thousand of our military brothers and sisters due McCains poor judgement. It was Obama who defended the welfare of our troops by voting against the stupid war. Obviously the Vets that are for McCain served in a different military than what I served in, the troops welfare always comes first. PERIOD!

John Air Force Vet   August 26th, 2008 10:32 am ET

Nice to see McBush has two words in his vocabulary SURGE-POW. Yet he would not support to new vets benefit package. He gets 100% disability! But does not support the vets-just war. The Iraq war was a republican/BUSH conspiracy! If Obama was the president we would have gone after Bin Lauden and had intense diplomatic relations with Russia before things got out of had. He would have respected the use of our troops and we would not be in debt over our ears.

al in memphis   August 26th, 2008 10:31 am ET

What the difference between a resolution acknowledging the surge work versus one acknowledging the war was not necessary. Or what about a resolution that says the American people want their political leaders to get to work on the real issues. Help fix a healthcare system that allow millions of working people to go bankrupt because of health issues. Let's have a million dollar ad about that.

DUTCH   August 26th, 2008 10:31 am ET

what was accomplished in the quote
unquote surge?

CM   August 26th, 2008 10:31 am ET

I see some people here are still thinking that Hillary and Bill are taking over Obama tonight. One guy even has it on 'good authority". Please be sensible enough to not come back on here after the roll call is finished and Obama makes his acceptance speech on Thursday

Billy   August 26th, 2008 10:30 am ET

2004 all over again. Will America fall for it?

jason, tx   August 26th, 2008 10:29 am ET

apparently these vets don't want benefits when they are done with their careers or injured. McCain cares far less for vets than Obama.

Terry   August 26th, 2008 10:27 am ET

Anybody ready for the Second American Revolution yet? Isn't it time to do away with our current system of electing our leaders? Yes, it is. If Americans really paid attention to what was going on, they would be marching in Washington and removing all of these politicians and trying them for treason for their actions.

arc, Lugano CH   August 26th, 2008 10:26 am ET

For an illegal war waged by Bush/Cheney and supported by Hillary.

gl   August 26th, 2008 10:26 am ET

This is laughable, Obama has said the surge helped in reducing violence but he didn't use the language they were expecting. All they really want to hear is, "John McCain was right". Ain't gonna happen buddy

That right and ain't gonna happen becasue if we didn't invade Iraq there would be no need for the Surge. When is McCain going to admit it was bad judgement to invade Iraq in the first place. Yes, I hope the Obama camp point out his voting recording for the vets.

Rob   August 26th, 2008 10:26 am ET

We need a Veteran for Presdent that supports his troops in battle;likes the American flag.We nee McGovern for President.He can't be bought out ;told not to run like Hillary.

Sharon   August 26th, 2008 10:25 am ET

Obama will not admit to anything Good someone else does.

He wants it to seem, that his idea to withdraw is the Reason America is withdrawing.

Does he care about our vets, our service members, our wounded Heroes………. NO

Obama Only Cares about Obama and winning.

larry wi   August 26th, 2008 10:25 am ET

Perfect, make him get off of his high horse make believe fantasy, and admit to the facts. He still doesn't have a clue, and never will.

Angela   August 26th, 2008 10:25 am ET

Both of these candidates are just plain scary for the future of our country- NO , we should not have gone to Iraq to begin with- especially with the real battle in Afganistan- the Iraq's now say for the latest agreement all US troops must be out before 2011-it's their country- what are both of these candidates going to do- both have no answers- yes, violence is down overall but how can we ever consider this any kind of success when most Iraq's dont feel safe to leave their home, high unemployment, women forced to wear veils , women's rights much less now than even under Saddam, lack of basic medical care , lack of reliable electricity , etc etc etc etc- that country is a total mess and Bush and Cheney need to be held accountable for that-

Mac in Nova Scotia   August 26th, 2008 10:25 am ET

I am a Viet Nam Vet 69-70 and I am voting for Obama. I don't want McCain to send my grandchildren into a war as useless as the one I was in or a war like Iraq that never should have been started in the first place. OKay the surge worked but it was only one piece of the big picture. Some of you guys are getting sucked in by McCain's use of his P.O.W. status as a political weapon. I don't hear him mentioning the 58,260 names on the Viet nam Wall that sacrificed far more than he did.

Will from NYC   August 26th, 2008 10:25 am ET

boycott cnn

Catherine   August 26th, 2008 10:24 am ET

I use to think that CNN was a equally critical and positive of both Obama and McCain but lately it seems CNN has joined the ranks of Fox News and in the tank for McCain. I guess David Gergen and James Carville will be the next Hannity and Hannity.

rhoward   August 26th, 2008 10:24 am ET

Thought the Republicans weren't going to air negative ads in Denver this week? Didn't take them long to change their tune, did it?

nc raleigh   August 26th, 2008 10:24 am ET

no this time it don t work
obama 08

Henry Blankett   August 26th, 2008 10:24 am ET

"Vets For Freedom" is a GOP front group formed in 2006 to help defeat Democratic opponents. Many of its staffers are also staffers for the McCain campaign, as well as other Republican politicians.

Linda from Prescott AZ   August 26th, 2008 10:24 am ET

I admire all who have gone to Iraq, although I am so sad that they went on this mistaken mission and so many lost their lives.
If McCain is elected you can count on seeing a lot more blood shed, he is so war infused/minded that he yearns to constantly do battle. He was a pow, okay, that was30+ years ago, he was part of a lost war and he cannot get over it.
Your loyalties lie in the wrong place.
McCain is a very bad joke.

S. Boatman   August 26th, 2008 10:24 am ET

Mccain Just Wants Obama To Say He Was Right . . . . Its Not Going To Happen!

Praetorian, Fort Myers   August 26th, 2008 10:24 am ET

It appears the Democratic party supports vets–but doesn't respect their ability to express an intellectual viewpoint.

I bet those U.S. fighter pilots who were fired at with S. Husseins surface to air missiles from the ceasefire of Gulf-1 until the recent invasion of Iraq also appreciate us taking the initiative.

Billy J   August 26th, 2008 10:24 am ET

Wow! Throw enough cops on the street and I bet crime would come down in my neighborhood too, along with the cops being safer, If this surge was such a good idea, why didn't we do it, when we first got there. Oh yeah…. it wasn't about people, it was bout showing off our shock and awe. I am glad it is working enuff to get us out. We should start withdrawing as soon as we can.

In the meantime, since he was smart enough not to allow comment. I would like to state that Jack Cafferty is an effete hack. I don't think I have ever seen a less professional 'commentator' in CNN's stable.

Mikey   August 26th, 2008 10:24 am ET

Okay….

Fact: McCain receives low marks from MOST veterans groups
Fact: Obama receives higher marks from MOST veterans groups
Fact: U.S. Military stationed overseas are donating to Obama at a rate 6 times higher than for McCain.
Fact: Obama voted for the New G.I. Bill, while McCain avoided the vote entirely - apparently not willing to take a real stand one way or the other.
Fact: McCain has not voted for 6 of the 7 funding bills over the last year. Obama has voted in favor of 3 of those seven bills.
Fact: Obama supported reasonable time between deployments, McCain did not.

If we had followed Obama's judgment, we would have saved hundreds of billions of dollars, 4,200 American lives, countless Iraqi lives, and avoided the destruction of Iraq and the displacement of hundreds of thousands of people. We would have more money to combat terrorism and would have focused on Afghanistan and Al Qaeda, not on Saddam Hussein and Iraqi oil.

But then if you can find a few vets and fund an ad, you can say anything, even make a pseudo draft dodger (W) look more patriotic than a bona-fide war hero (Kerry).

The McCain camp, like the Bush campaign of 2004, know no shame!

Theresa - Minneapolis   August 26th, 2008 10:24 am ET

I would certianly hope the surge is working being that it was also an enormous SURGE in our money being spent there!

I am so sick of this!!

Michael   August 26th, 2008 10:24 am ET

What does Obama know about the military, other than what he sees on paper? He never served, never been an active participant in an AOR, never been to a military funeral. Pointed, what does Obama know about the military?

R.I.F.   August 26th, 2008 10:23 am ET

I notice that negative ads about Obama race to the top of the ticker but whenever someone puts out one about McCain CNN reluctantly puts it in the middle or towards to bottom of the ticker. Don't believe me? Watch. The ad that Obama released yestarday hitting McCain on the economy debuted around the bottom of the ticker and quickly fell off. CNN = McCain's campaign arm.

Chipster   August 26th, 2008 10:23 am ET

These Veterans need to wise up. The listen to the GOP rhetoric but don't bother to notice that the GOP, including McCain, have voted consistently against veterans benefits. The President sent them to a war based on deceit, inadequately equipped, and has failed to provide adequate health care for them on their return.

President Bush refused to send the number of troops needed right from the beginning. It's no surprise that sending more soldiers would make a difference on the ground but has it actually achieved anything to change the hearts and minds of the Iraqi people or the political stability? Veterans should take a closer look. We still haven't captured or killed those who actually attacked us on 9/11!

Xavier, Saint Louis, Missouri   August 26th, 2008 10:23 am ET

Please! The surge did not work alone! The US is paying our enemies to behave and not attack our troops! The almighty dollar works, not the surge!

TC, Fl   August 26th, 2008 10:23 am ET

Hey Obama-blivions, don't forget it's the Bush/McCain/Clinton/BIDEN war in Iraq.

Jeff   August 26th, 2008 10:23 am ET

If democrats were at all interested in "Securing America's Future" they wouldn’t have nominated this arrogant egomaniac to be the democratic nominee.

ObamaAllTheWay   August 26th, 2008 10:22 am ET

This idiot Sgt. Gabriel Herrera does not represent our troops, Obama did acknowledge how successful and courges our troops were, but the big picture this war is wrong and not worthy to die for, our troops should be spending their precious time in Afganistan as obama sujested, that is the war that count, that is the place where the bad guy live. People listent to this wise and great leader he is looking 50 years ahead. Yes we can with President Obama.

Dude   August 26th, 2008 10:22 am ET

The Democrat leadership voted for the war in Iraq. But, once the troops got there and the going got tough, the Democrats immediately started undermining their mission and American foreign policy by rewriting history and reverting to the baby-killer rhetoric of the Vietnam era. It's no wonder that some of the veterans are using a 527 to amplify their voices. Saddam is gone. Our troops positively verified that Iraq does not have WMDs. Our troops removed a festering enemy from the world stage in a dangerous era. They also worked hard to develop a relationship with the Sunnis and enable the "awakening" movement that has also helped put Al Queda in Iraq on the defensive.

McCain got that "boots on the ground" are important to victory when everyone else was talking about defeat. Yes, America could have used better intelligence and made better choices in the region. But, suffering a defeat at the hands of ANY Middle Eastern or Muslim foe is the worst and most dangerous decision that America could ever make. Iraq will be on it's own soon and they'll make their own decisions. But, they'd never have had the chance without the help of America's military.

Jim Schimmer   August 26th, 2008 10:22 am ET

Fear again….
What is the purpose of this war????

There are sooo many bad people governing nations.. How abt wage a war on all of them with our tax $??

ignorant people….

Brian   August 26th, 2008 10:22 am ET

How has the "surge" worked? Its as if nobody remembers the indented purpose of the "surge". It was a strategy that was supposed to quell violence so the Iraqi government could strengthen itself. There was at one point diplomatic milestone that they were hoping to achieve by reducing violence. There was also a timeline to achieve them. By adding more solider of course we reduced violence but the strategy has not worked if there has been no diplomatic progress.

Thomas   August 26th, 2008 10:21 am ET

Know the facts "Do they know Teddy-Kennedy, Kerry, Edwards all voted for Iraq War ?"

Know the facts, you have convinced me. I won't be voting for Kennedy, Kerry, or Edwards for President in the 2008 election.

I will be voting for Obama though.

Congratulations on convincing me.

Maggie Muggins From Selwyn   August 26th, 2008 10:21 am ET

The entire campaign of McCains is based on him being a POW and a surge in an illegal war. The whole world is laughing at how ridiculous this tired old man appears and how his answer to everything is a recollection of being a POW.

It's clear the citizens of the U.S. have a distinct choice in this election and that choice is to regress back to the 50's & 60's or emerge into the 21st century with the rest of the modern societies in the world.

As far as experience is concerned just what good experiences has John McCain given Americans over the decades he has been a Washington insider? Experience is only counts if it's a good experience and if it was not so good then the old adage of "YOU CAN'T MAKE A SILK PURSE OUT OF A PIG'S EAR" will apply.

Shaking my head   August 26th, 2008 10:20 am ET

Obama said one of America' greatest failings that he told the Rev. Rick Warren at Saddleback church was that "we still don't abide by that basic precept of Matthew: that whatever you do for the least of my brothers, you do for me." I can't believe I agree with him on something, you are proving it with every word.

PA   August 26th, 2008 10:20 am ET

Sure the surge worked, but you can add 130 thousand police officers to a city in the US and crime will go down, then what, do you really think that when they are removed from Iraq the insurgents won’t continue their activities? Do we really want to use our military as police while we pay the enormous bill? It makes no sense!

Napoleon Complex   August 26th, 2008 10:19 am ET

Glad to see that the Bush Administration is adopting Obama's foreign policy objectives. Withdrawal from Iraq, redeployment to Afganistan, diplomatic solutions to the Iran issue.

Face it, Obama is much smarter and has better judgment that McCain ever will. Fear and intimidation has worked for the Republicans in the past, but it won't work this time.

Give me a break   August 26th, 2008 10:19 am ET

Oh by the way. Quit asking why are we there in the first place! We are there; deal with it. Whinning about the fact we should have never been there in the first place isn't going to solve the problem.

And for those of you that think McCain should be tried as a war criminal for supporting it I guess you won't mind seeing Hillary and Joe standing next to him as defendents since they voted for it as well!!

Rudy NYC   August 26th, 2008 10:19 am ET

Veterans spending over a million on political advertising. That's a lot of money for the average enlisted person or group of them.

What's wrong with that picture?

CC   August 26th, 2008 10:18 am ET

Yawning……You will always find those for and against any cause. Let's see what the next attack against Obama will be.

Infantacide rules!!! vote obama ;-)   August 26th, 2008 10:18 am ET

NORA, FLORIDA August 26th, 2008 9:58 am ET

No Disrespect to the Vets of this country but to spend 1.1 million dollars for foolishness is crazy. Put that money to good use, like better healthcare coverage and housing for many vets who are homeless

I guess the same could be said about the 4 day event in denver, I wonder how much that is costing, and how many mouths could have been fed with it. Instead in true Dem fashion Obama will just start a global poverty tax to "feed the poor."

Keep our USA safe! McCain 08   August 26th, 2008 10:18 am ET

YOu BO supporters makek me SICK! We are tallking about our men and girls who are there and thantks to the surge they will be coming home…… The BO supporters better pray every night if he gets elected.
Dem. gone repub.

Anonymous   August 26th, 2008 10:18 am ET

"The Surge" has become a brand name, owned by McCain, just like "Support the Troops" and now "POW."

Cory in Little Rock   August 26th, 2008 10:18 am ET

I've always wondered why McCain is for sending more troops, spending more money on military equipment but is against giving our troops health care and an education once they come back…

Oh yeah… I believes that if we make our troops too intelligent, they won't go back to war!

Mc   August 26th, 2008 10:17 am ET

Doug, I guarantee some of us with boys over care a LOT about the surge. I didn't want us there and I would almost agree with you that the whole thing is borderline illegal, but my son feels he is doing something good over there and a self-righteous blowhard is not what we need right now. We must win or get out. This back and forth, partisan garbage is what has hurt us all along.

V. Veteran   August 26th, 2008 10:17 am ET

4000+ dead U.S. Troops and who knows how many with disabilities and PTSD which, would have NEVER been the case if the powers-that-be didn't invade a country which we had NO BUSINESS BEING IN, in the first place.

The blood of those dead are on the hands of those who insisted on sending the troops into Iraq and on those who insisted that we stay.

Tony   August 26th, 2008 10:17 am ET

SWIFT BOAT! SWIFT BOAT! SWIFT BOAT! SWIFT BOAT!

It really is ashame that so many Americans are apathetic, lazy, whiny and just plain IGNORANT.

Anyone want a re-fill of their Kool-AId?

Bendo   August 26th, 2008 10:17 am ET

Ok, lets get the reply atack ad up pointing out all of what the otheres have said and discredit this asap!

Anonymous   August 26th, 2008 10:17 am ET

A Congressional Resolution on the success of a strategy? Was there one when Clinton bombed Kosovo? Will there be one about the overall disaster that invading Iraq in the first place has been?

Duke   August 26th, 2008 10:16 am ET

This stuff really speaks to the Republican's continued insult to the intelligence of the average American. You can't blame them, this stuff worked last time.

Let's see if the American people will allow the Republican's to swiftboat the country 2 times in a row. Wake up America.

McCain has a built in advantage with the miliary because he is ex-military. Obama is receiving more donations from servicemen than McCain. That should tell you something.

Sick & Tired of Nobama   August 26th, 2008 10:16 am ET

I have it on good authority that Hillary and Bill will take over the convention tonight. The delegates are voting her in and Nobama out. Bye Bye nobama, too bad for you.

Betty   August 26th, 2008 10:16 am ET

Maybe they should spend 1.1 million helping returning injured soldiers instead of wasting it on nonsense like this.

These ads won't work this time. What a waste of money when so many vets need help.

Obama/Biden '08

NotFallingInLine.org   August 26th, 2008 10:16 am ET

Yes Mr. Herrera the surge did work. Thanks to President Bush and John McCain we have over 4,200 Americans dead. And to think that we did all this for a successful surge.

William Horne II   August 26th, 2008 10:16 am ET

Screw the vets. They need to keep drinking at their VFWs and American Legions and stay out of the way of constructive change in an America in which they have no place.

The Bush Twins : George and John   August 26th, 2008 10:15 am ET

Vets For Freedom ?. They're going to spend 1.1 million on an ad to try and get Sen. Obama to say the surge worked ?. Isn't it obvious who is backing this ad ?.
Shouldn't the Vets For Freedom be putting the money to better use?. Such as helping the service members that are in need when they return home to find they aren't gettin the proper medical care their government should be providing. There is a long list of things they could do to help other vets. It's a shame they are going to let McBush use them this way

fella from Chicago   August 26th, 2008 10:15 am ET

Obama will never give credit to the inroads the "surge" accomplished, because to do so he would have to give recognition to the President and Senator McCain that their plan of adding additional troops worked. For those who keep harping on Senator McCain's vote for going into Iraq in the first place let me direct you to the votes of Senators Clinton and Biden. See a difference? And if Senator Biden had his way in splitting Iraq into three distinct territorial bodies as he wanted previously, we would be fighting on many more fronts then we are now. Finally, Senator McCain will leave Iraq when the people there have a chance to establish democracy without bullets and bombs flying around them. 4,200 precious American lives have been lost from a volunteer Army over 5 years, but let us not forget over 70,000 American lives were lost in Viet Nam in a shorter time span and we left there with the sour taste of defeat in our months. I'm with Senator McCain; never again!

kenny   August 26th, 2008 10:15 am ET

Thank you, finally some recognition in the media of how the majority of veterans really feel on the war. I've spoken to numerous veterans who served in Fallujah during some of its darkest hours and I can tell you that every single one of them echoes this sentiment. They are not "fake" vets in anyway just because they go against your opinion.

Sick & Tired of Nobama   August 26th, 2008 10:14 am ET

Nobama is a hard head and won't comply. We don't need this clown America, get off the hope dope and see reality.

Is Anybody Listening???   August 26th, 2008 10:14 am ET

How many times does the man have to acknowledge that the surge made strides toward the security in Iraq? Why is it nobody's listening? It's really confusing. I've heard him address that on many occasions. Yes, the surge has had a definite effect in Iraq, but if the truth is important aren't there other mitigating facts that also contributed to the success?

For example, didn't this government pay the Sunni's $300 each to turn their allegiance to the United States and the millitia laying down their weapons? Those as well is a determining factor that made a great difference.

Furthermore, surge or no surge, we have invaded another country without provocation. We are occupying a sovereign nation based on lies. That is the greatest admission that needs to be pointed out here, not whether or not the surge was successful.

There weren’t any WMD's and there was no Al Qaeda in Iraq, those were flat out lies. We are in Iraq under false pretenses.

Now that's the TRUTH……

Ted   August 26th, 2008 10:14 am ET

We went to Iraq to protect America's future. The soldiers there respect the job they are doing and anyone saying something different disrespects them, their fallen friends and our country.

Have some respect for America and our soldiers.

Of course most Obama supporters have no idea what it means to wear the uniform and serve this country.

Oh, and McCain voted for our troops EVERY time. Obama was on vacation most of the time and didn't even cast his vote.

Angela   August 26th, 2008 10:14 am ET

These are NOT objective veterans. They are Republican veterans.

Why don’t they ask the most important question of the Iraq war. Why did Bush, Cheney & McCAIN vote for this immoral war? Please ask Why doesn’t McCain admit that voting for this unwarranted war was the biggest make he made AND that he must apologize to the American & Iraq people, including you veterans

How about them apples?

ron   August 26th, 2008 10:13 am ET

here comes another flip flop probably beginning with i have always believed yada yada yada and people actually believe this man

Joe Black   August 26th, 2008 10:13 am ET

Good News! the RNC is running out of steam and ideas !!!

Now the re-United dems will tear them apart.Bring it on, now !
POST THIS CNN

Shaking my head   August 26th, 2008 10:13 am ET

Or better yet, you could be a bunch of selfish people and just leave Iraq and who cares if it falls apart, not our problem right? So long as we're ok, that's all that matters right?

Obama 08   August 26th, 2008 10:13 am ET

CNN: Do your job: who are these vets; how many do they represent; how did they rasie the money for their ad; are they servicemen and women or people of higher ranks??

McCain's hollow threats to Russia are a resuly of him supporting the invasion in Iraq as well as the chaos in Afghanistan!

McCain lacks the judgment and temperment to be Commander in Chief and should immediately release the 90% of his military records.

Sherry, Atlanta   August 26th, 2008 10:12 am ET

I HAVE TO QUESTION THE AUTHOR OF THIS AD. . .MILITARY PERSONNEL ARE IN SUPPORT OF SENATOR OBAMA.

THIS SOUNDS LIKE 'MCCAIN CAMP', DOING WHAT THEY DO BEST.

ENOUGH OF MCCAIN/BUSH TACTICS!

OBAMA/BIDEN '08-'12

H. Shakur   August 26th, 2008 10:12 am ET

Who cares about the freakin surge! Bring our troops home already! Iraq doesn't want us there any more! Instead of preaching for resolution, and wanting to hear a politician agree to a surge that shouldn't have taken place in the first place because of an ill advised war , you need to be thinking about getting home to your families as soon as possible instead of being used as a puppet for some political party! Your families need you and you're playing politics! We know you all did a hell of a job over there, but Obama's on your side more often than McCain is! Wake up! And come HOME!

JB, Boston   August 26th, 2008 10:12 am ET

Look, there is no argument. You can be a closed minded dem if you choose, but, that doesn't change the fact (and History) that MANY DEMS wanted to abort the surge and move forward with a full pull out. They were wrong. And being a dem, and acknowledging this shows you are healthy and understand your party is not always right.

Obama wanted a full pullout. Even during the Primaries he was demanding a full pull out.

The surge worked, and now, Obama himself is no longer demanding a full pullout. And just a reminder, Obama was saying months before ALL troops out within months.

He cannot say that anymore. So, Obama can hum and hah and try to make something sound more supportive of his ideas, BUT HE WAS WRONG!!!!!

There is no harm in being wrong. We all are wrong sometimes. I am still voting for Obama, but, COME ON. Grow a set, and admit you were incorrect. Actually, that is a good slogan. You can use it if you want!! : )

Rudy NYC   August 26th, 2008 10:12 am ET

The "Surge" came too late to achieve what it really could have achieved. Don't forget that immediately following the fall of Baghdad Rumsfeld began pulling troops out of Baghdad, and Iraq in general. The GOP wanted to keep the promise of a short war, "just like Kuwait". Remember?

Congressional Democrats, including curiously McCain, Biden and Obama, objected and pointed out that more troops were needed to consolidate gains. That political stance continued until 2006 when Democrats began calling for a pullout, to end the war.

Now the Republicans wanted to bring in more troops, which they named like everything else they own, "The Surge". How much more effective could the Surge have been had troops been brought in as soon as Baghdad fell instead of removing them? The Surge was 5 years too late folks. How many lives could have been saved?

Stacy   August 26th, 2008 10:11 am ET

Do those veterans with all the respect acknowledge that the war in Iraq was and is a mistake?
Does Mc Cain acknowledge that it was and is a mistake?
What about all those who lost there in a war Iraq.
They also has to acknoledge something?
So at the end of the day I will ask those veterans acknowledge what?

BudInTexas   August 26th, 2008 10:11 am ET

Over 4,100 dead in Iraq.

Over 1,000 dead from the surger.

Over 47,000,000 without health insurance.

More Americans living in poverty than ever before.

And all we get is - the surge worked, drill here drill now, and the hell with real Americans who are suffering.

Now that is the real McCain (whoops sorry - he was a POW)

Obama = 2nd Carter Term   August 26th, 2008 10:11 am ET

Tony August 26th, 2008 9:42 am ET

Can anyone say…….."Swift Boat"??????????

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

I hope you and others keep saying it b/c that will backfire on you so fast. These are guys that are there and have been there. They are expressing views. Go ahead and bash them. That makes more people vote for McCain everytime you do.

Election Watcher   August 26th, 2008 10:11 am ET

Despite what he'd have us believe now (and heaven knows he's changed his story more times than anyone can count) Obama is ON RECORD saying that had he been in office at the time HE TOO WOULD HAVE VOTED TO GO TO WAR! Despite what he says about opposing the war, he has voted IN FAVOR of every single defense spending bill since taking office. So my question, is who are we to believe?

Alex, USMC   August 26th, 2008 10:11 am ET

Hey, Conservative Former Marine–

Current Marine here.

Just from an objective spending standpoint, Obama has actually voted to increase the benefits and pay of the Marines more than John McCain. John McCain has pushed for greater funding for the war, Obama has voted for more money for the war-fighter (the individual Marines).

I'm not saying vote for Obama. but from a purely objective level, Obama has actually increased the funding for the people fighting the war, even though he believes we should be out of Iraq. So yes, he'd cut funding…but that happens whenever you end a war. The important question in my mind is whether the people who fight the wars are taken care of.

Intereting stat– do you know under who's watch the largest pay raise for enlisted service members has seen in the past 20 years happened? Bill Clinton. Conservaties typically vote for more money to the military, less money/benefits to the actual people in the military.

vic nashville,Tn   August 26th, 2008 10:11 am ET

2008 is Mc Cain year
Hillary 2012 / Mc Cain 2008

gl   August 26th, 2008 10:11 am ET

If i was barack obama i would do more to tie iraq into the economy…..Gas average was 1.39 before we went to iraq…. It is now 4 dollars a gallon….we are giving 200 million to the sons of liberty in iraq which is …more!

John nice comment. I hope Obama camp read these comments.
After the Convention Obama camp have to hit back with bricks. Very great comment.

Steve (Iraq Veteran)   August 26th, 2008 10:10 am ET

Don't lump all veterans together please. I am a veteran and would never support McCain. What I want to know is why is the senate wasting time with a Resolution that says the Surge worked, do we really need to waste time on that just so people can use the vote against other people. These grown ups are so childish.

Earl   August 26th, 2008 10:10 am ET

Let me guess….McWar is paying them money to stir the pot about the

Surge…..give me a break….are you ever a bunch of bitter people

gt   August 26th, 2008 10:10 am ET

get your head out of your butt , yes it work , but now lets get the troops home.

JOKE   August 26th, 2008 10:09 am ET

THIS IS A BIG JOKE . YOU BREAK MY CAR AND HELP ME FIX IT THEN YOU WANT THANKS AND PAYMENT. THIS THE SAME TYPE OF STUPIDITY THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT. WE SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN THERE IN THE FIRST PLACE . TO MAKE THIS STATEMENT IS MINDLESS. MORONS.

OBAMA……08

Bob   August 26th, 2008 10:09 am ET

Does anyone actually think that talking to voters about the war is going to help McCain and hurt Obama?

Brina   August 26th, 2008 10:09 am ET

A Noun, The Surge and POW.

kristopher   August 26th, 2008 10:09 am ET

Geez! I'm tired of hearing about "the surge' and how it's worked to perfection! It's common sense to say that "in a police state adding more police will lower violence!", wow that's groundbreaking news there! Common sense tells you if you added 25% more police anywhere crime would go down. The real question is why isn't Iraq stepping up and taking control of their own country? Why is it we're going broke on this war while the Iraqi gov. has a surplus of oil revenue approaching $79 billion!

McBride, SLC, UT   August 26th, 2008 10:09 am ET

We should have never been there in the first place!

Mike, Syracuse, NY   August 26th, 2008 10:08 am ET

Jim, true the Sunni Awakening started before the surge. However if you look at US casualty figures month by month (I did, you can google them), you will see that they kept going up. The month after the first surge troops started arriving casualties started to fall, and have been falling ever since. So the influence of the Awakening is debatable, but the fact that the surge worked is not.

Judgement over Experience   August 26th, 2008 10:08 am ET

Surge? You've got to be kidding me? WE SHOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN THERE IN THE FIRST PLACE. You repuglicans are disgusting and the same ones that are spouting this idiotic rhetoric have not lost a son or daughter to this senseless war. How do you people sleep at night?

Curtis   August 26th, 2008 10:08 am ET

It is too bad that people do not understand military tactics or their own candidate’s short comings. The Dem heroes "Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and yes "The One" Obama will not admit the success of the surge or thank our troops for the work "WE" have done. I think my mouth would hit the floor if Obama let us know where he stood on a single issue and stuck with it, without changing his mind every 5 seconds.

This trio is one of the most destructive forces on the planet. If they had their way they would dismantle the military and use the remains as planters. In some ways I wish Obama would win. That way the sheep will finally have their eyes forced open and see what you should have long realized. It is a shame it will take this level for people to be educated.

Fire away people I know what is coming!

Erika, KS   August 26th, 2008 10:07 am ET

Oh me, oh my! Who cares what the wife has to say? She didn't have a first-lady look about her. How very unprofessional to dress to casual. This whole convention is big dog and pony show. Fakers, all of them.

Mike in ATL   August 26th, 2008 10:07 am ET

CNN now is the time for your channel to lay it out in the open the voting records of Mcsame and Obama when it comes to the military. Cos it looks here that "vets for freedom" think McSame is on their side. He has never been. He voted against all that is good for the better life a military family need. Pls let the world know McSame voting record in the senate on military issues. PLS PLS PLS

Winny   August 26th, 2008 10:07 am ET

The issue is not about the surge, it's the war. We should not have been there in the first place. The number of lives lost, those injured, money spent, families that are suffering beyond comfort because they lost their loved ones or have returned injured mentally and physically. That is the problem. We are spending money in a country that we could be using to build the infrastructure of this great country. Dishing out money like we don't need it here. Come on. The surge i