September 3, 2008
Posted: September 3rd, 2008 12:13 PM ET

From
Steve Schmidt is a top aide to John McCain.
Steve Schmidt is a top aide to John McCain.

ST. PAUL (CNN) – John McCain's campaign Wednesday called the tough media scrutiny of Alaska Governor Sarah Palin a "faux media scandal designed to destroy the first female Republican" vice presidential nominee.

The McCain campaign has been engaged in an increasingly fierce offensive against media coverage of McCain's choice of running mate that has questioned how her experience would be applied to the vice president's job.

"Governor Sarah Palin is an exceptional governor with a record of accomplishment that exceeds, by far, the governing accomplishments of Senator Obama," wrote senior adviser Steve Schmidt in a memo sent to reporters Wednesday morning. "Her selection came after a six-month long rigorous vetting process where her extraordinary credentials and exceptionalism became clear."

Watch: Palin set for center stage

"This vetting controversy is a faux media scandal designed to destroy the first female Republican nominee for Vice President of the United States who has never been a part of the old boys' network that has come to dominate the news establishment in this country."

Over the past several days, the McCain campaign has been questioned about the Palins' business dealings and political affiliations, and the governor's reformer record. The Palins and the campaign have issued statements on the pregnancy of 17-year-old daughter Bristol, and the two-decade old DWI arrest of the governor's husband Todd.

The campaign, which has spent the summer complaining about news coverage of the presidential race, has spent the past few days pushing back on blogosphere rumors – including the release of a blizzard of memos and documents in recent days many of which had not yet been reported in mainstream media outlets.

As reporters continue to press for details on the thoroughness of McCain's vice presidential vetting process, Schmidt, a former senior adviser for President Bush's 2004 re-election team, said the Arizona senator "picked his governing partner after a long and thorough search.

"The McCain campaign will have no further comment about our long and thorough process. This nonsense is over. .The American people get to do the vetting now on Election Day – November 4th."

Filed under: Popular Posts • Republican National Convention • Sarah Palin


<
Rickhou   September 3rd, 2008 2:34 pm ET

If Britney Spears little sister got so much attention. Being all over the media and magazines about having a baby. Do you really think that media are going to leave the Gov. Palin's family alone. NO WAY!. She’s running for V.P.
The media was trashing Lynn Spears (britney’s mother) for being a horrible mother. People was giving her so much heat for not controlling her daugthers. That had nothing to do with being a republican or democrat. It’s the media. That’s how they work. So eveyone who wants to blame the media for being an “angry left” and not treating Gov. Palin fair, is wrong. If this would have happen to Obama’s family the coverage would be the same. Wake up and realize the media is out there for only stories and it’s working because we’re ALL on here reading and commenting about it.

Keri   September 3rd, 2008 2:34 pm ET

with a record of accomplishment that exceeds, by far, the governing accomplishments of Senator Obama"

Obama:
B.A in political science from Columbia University, with a specialization in international relations
J.D. in Law from Hardvard, graduated magna cum laude; President of the Harvard Law Review
12 years (92-04) teaching constitutional law
7 years State Senator: sponsored more than 800 bills
4 years Senator for Illinos, a state with 12.8 million people

Palin:
Bachelor's in journalism from University of Idaho
4 years Wasilla City Council (8000 people)
6 years Wasilla mayor (8000 people)
1 year "Ethics Commissioner of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission"
20 months governor of a state with 660,000 people

Do they really think we're THAT stupid?

Part of the Angry Left   September 3rd, 2008 2:33 pm ET

Its the Republican way, if you don't like the truth, just blame the people who find it, remember... where there is smoke, there's fire.

Maureen / California   September 3rd, 2008 2:33 pm ET

Since when is it sexist to question a candidates' credentials? There is a reason that the Republicans NEED to pretend that sexism is the reason that Palins' credentials are being questioned. They need this spin because they have no answers to the questions asked of them on Palin by the journalists. I have witnessed it several times over the past few days. Tucker Bounds dodged SIMPLE questions asked of him by Campbell Brown two days ago. It was funny. He later cried about this to McCain who then announced that he was cancelling an appearance on Larry King. That is hilarious!!! Also, the Republicans are blaming the media for even discussing the pregnancy of her daughter. But Sarah Palin and the Reps are making a point to tell the media that they are proud of her choice to keep the baby and get married to the high school boy that is the father. By making this religious/political statement, they are opening the door for debate. They can't have it both ways. By the way, I voted for Hillary and I do not think that she lost because of sexism. But sexism does exist and It is a shame that the Republicans are making a mockery of it.

Kris   September 3rd, 2008 2:33 pm ET

Palin was a gimmick. plain and simple. I feel sorry for her daughter. She really put her daughter out there for her political gain. She saw how the media went after Obama, Hillary and Michelle. Why would she think that they would not go after her? Anything new or different goes under the microscope for better or worse. Surely she knew that??? McCain knew that. But he did not care. I really feel bad for Sarah and her family.

Ron   September 3rd, 2008 2:33 pm ET

We the public did not get Palin into two ethics scandals.
We the public did not join an Alaskan Anti-American political party.
We the public did not secure earmarks in the millions for Alaska.
We the public did not lie about a pregnancy.
We the public did not tie ourselves to Abramoff.
We the public did not say global warming was made up.

Don't blame the media. Palin and McCain did this to themselves.
http://www.impalin.com
http://www.therealmccain.com

JD   September 3rd, 2008 2:33 pm ET

People - get over it! Palin is condemned for not staying at home to raise her family even though she has extended family support. Wasn't it Hillary who said "IT TAKES A VILLAGE – to raise a child?" Talk about double standards. Bill Clinton's extra "relationships" didn't appear to slow him down from running/ruining the country. But yet Palin is told to stay home??? Perhaps Michelle O should stay at home to raise her two girls instead of relying on her mother to help! Okay CNN, will you publish this!

charlie marks   September 3rd, 2008 2:33 pm ET

I don't see the media doing to PALIN NO MORE THAN SEAN HANITY IAND FOX NEWS IS DOING TO OBAMA

I Like My Rights   September 3rd, 2008 2:33 pm ET

Two things:

1 – I'm suprised (well, not that much) that neither candidate picked a running mate that has the experience to take a real run at strengthening our economy and making us energy independent. Those are two huge issues that only seem to be addressed when gas prices are in the headlines. Which brings up the larger question...why aren't we focusing on the issues we face and the policies of each candidate instead of trying to attack each other over political party affiliation. Ignore stupidity and move on!

2 – There are so many illogical and irrational comparisons made in the comments about this article it's sickening. Let's face the truth people, there is a double standard on both sides, both republican and democrat. In the end neither is for the people. It's about controlling Washington, not change, regardless of what politicians tell you.

Quick question....How far are we willing to scrutinize another person's life before it becomes a witchhunt and not a debate.

MARY   September 3rd, 2008 2:33 pm ET

Won't it be FUN TO see Palin and Hilliary go at each other's throat if McCain wins and Hilliary decides to run in 2016 against Palin? WHAT A HELL OF A CAT FIGHT. I put my money on HILLIARY.

robert, oakland ca   September 3rd, 2008 2:33 pm ET

"False" media scandal? You're kidding me. McCain brought this on himself, FAR too many questions about this rabbit out of the hat that need to be asked. To do otherwise would be irresponsibly turning a blind eye.

When asked by charlie rose (in an october interview along with Janet Napolitano) if she knew what bush's economic policy was in OCTOBER 2007 she paused, smiled and said "well sure we all hear about it in the media"... give me a break.

Guess what Sarah Palin said earlier this year to the New Yorker:

"Something's kind of changing here in Alaska, too, for being such a red state on the Presidential level. Obama's doing just fine in polls up here, which is kind of wigging people out, because they're saying, 'This hasn't happened for decades that in polls the D' "–the Democratic candidate–" 'is doing just fine.' To me, that's indicative, too. It's the no-more-status-quo, it's change."

ron   September 3rd, 2008 2:32 pm ET

Since your into reporting background of candidates, why don't you bring up the fact that OB has admitted to taking cocaine in his youth or is it more important to know that her husband had a "reported: (not cooberated) DUI 22 years ago. I did not realize he is running for VP but OB is running to be president.

Ah yes, then their is good old pontificating Joe. Has any reporting been done about his son's lobbying ties to his dad. Oh yes, I know, both OB and good old Joe are democrats so we don't want any negative reporting.

Ben   September 3rd, 2008 2:32 pm ET

More Liberal hypocrisy. It'd be funny if it weren't so sad.

Independent Vote   September 3rd, 2008 2:32 pm ET

With this ticket McCain/Palin should I feel more safe regarding our national security?

Particularly, if Palin ends up being President because of McCain's health conerns.

This a new face. and, new person being introduced and before the above mentioned reason; America (press or not) will go over Palin's record with a fine tooth comb. DID THEY THINK WE WOULD JUST VOTE FOR HER BLINDLY, OR FOLLOW THEIR SPIN?

Some of us do vote because of policy.

This camp CAN cry FOUL all they want but they have a bigger problem than MSM...the National Enquirer is digging deep and digging wide.

That's one news outlet (and I use that term loosely) they won't be able to put the brakes on, and, and they are speaking directly to the demographic the campaign is targeting. Oh, and they are willing to pay for their info, photos, video, etc.

Irene Ross   September 3rd, 2008 2:32 pm ET

marryann,
If you were a lifelong Democrat as you ask us to believe there is no way no how would you vote for this McCain Palin ticket....so just another closet Republican.

Tamara   September 3rd, 2008 2:32 pm ET

GOP just admit you made the wrong choice. JUST ADMIT IT! I am a woman and I would love to see a women in the white house but not a woman who Has a disabled child and a daughter whom she is going to have to support., not to mention being there for her other childre. Super woman is just a super hero. AMERICANS ARE NOT THAT DUMB!

victor,nj   September 3rd, 2008 2:32 pm ET

I AM WATCHING C-SPAN NOW AND THEY HAVE REPUBLICAN WOMEN CALLING THE MEDIA COVERAGE OF SARA PALIN SEXIST AND SOMEHOW ARE BLAMING IT ON OBAMA. I AM CONVINCED NOW THAT THE REPUBLICANS WILL DO ANYTHING TO WIN THIS ELECTION. I HOPE VOTERS DONT FALL FOR THIS PLOY. WHEN IS IT SEXISM TO QUESTION A WOMANS QUALIFICATION FOR A JOB. THESE AS BECOME A SOAP OPERA. ALL THEY WANT IS SYMPATHY VOTES.

Are You Kidding ME   September 3rd, 2008 2:32 pm ET

This is Beyond Belief:

John McCain and his Repbulican party are trying to do anything and everything to ensure this campaign is not about issues.

First they take a comment that Obama has been stating well before he won the democratic primaries: Quoting Obama (I get it, I don't look like all the presidents of the past, I have a funny sounding name and big ears) and they say that Barack is playing the race card. As if being Black in America is a net plus for him in his effort to become president.

Next, they focus on the fact that Barack is a celebrity... Have you noticed no issues yet.

Now they are crying sexism because people are trying to find out who his VP choice is. Obviously, if he would have picked someone more known, the media would not have to focus so much on her. But alas if we are talking about sexism we are not talking about the Economy, about the fact that the world over now has great disdain for America and that thousands of U.S men and women are dying in Iraq for oil.

The truth is McCain and his party will ensure that this race will never be about issues. Of course they will make mention of an issue here and there to keep the public off guard, but that's no different than a football team who thows the ball on everydown sneaking in a running play just to keep the defense thinking. Needless to say, if McCain did not want to make this issue about sex he would simply tell his people to eliminate it as one of their most IMPORTANT issues in their talking points to the media. This is a carefully orchestrated strategy that is design to insult the intelligence of every American, Republican or Democrat.

Now after this issue loses its wind, and as we grow closer to November 4th, we shall all be slammed by issues of Rev. Wright, Michelle Obama's first time in my life I am proud of my Country comment and of course the infamous clinging to guns and religion comment. However, at no time will we ever here a true plan of how a McCain presidency will be different than what we have endured for the last eight years or his vision for this country.

I am an independent, thus not for Republican or Democrats and it is for the very reasons mention above that I have escaped from the big two parties.

However, given the insulting nature of McCain's campaign on the intellegence and basic common sense of Americans, there is NO WAY I could ever cast a vote for McCain or Palin who McCain and the Republicans have reduced to simply:

A LADY FOR HIRE!!!!

RONE   September 3rd, 2008 2:32 pm ET

Palin should show the American People this Trig's birth certificate if she is this child's real mother and not Bristol...they forced Obama to produce his birth certificate...we are not stupid!!! Where are Sean Hannity and Limbaugh on this one?

wrob from GA   September 3rd, 2008 2:31 pm ET

Obama may be a different kind of candidate – but who is more risky? McCain does not have the judgement nor the thoughtful temperment to be President. It's scary – really. He is stubborn with a don't-confuse-me-with-the-facts mentality and not inclusive at all. We see where that got us for the last eight years. We don't need more of the same. Let's give Obama a chance. We don't need to be the laughing stock of the whole world audience.

john   September 3rd, 2008 2:31 pm ET

Palin is a breath of fresh air. If you are a Republican or not, you must admit she clearly offers a different choice for the American people.

I find her to be the most interesting a genuine of the POTUS/VP candidates. Too bad the Clinton News Network had to try the hatchet job approach out of the gate instead of doing a study of the person and her background.

The only reason that Palin's daughter is an issue is because the MEDIA made it so. Any somewhat objective person that watched the grilling CNN gave McCain's aid and contrasts it with their breathless following of Obama's overseas trip can't help but conclude who gets the more favorable and biased treatment.

Simon   September 3rd, 2008 2:31 pm ET

New From Mattel:

Caribou Barbie!!!
Comes with helicopter, telescopic rifle and wolf pack
(Snowmobile, pork barrel, DWi Husband and pregnant daughter optional)

Sandy   September 3rd, 2008 2:31 pm ET

WHATS GOOD FOR THE GOOSE IS GOOD FOR THE GANDER. I SWEAR THIS IS SO UNFAIR THAT SHE CAN'T GET THE SAME TREATMENT OBAMA GOT. I SAY DIG IT UP AND THEN PROVE US WRONG. IF THERE IS NOTHING TO HIDE THERE SHOULD BE NO FEAR. I STILL THINK EXECUTIVE EXPERIENCE MEANS NOTHING WHEN DEALING WITH WAR, CAN SHE HANDLE THE TASK IF NEEDED?

SBAMA   September 3rd, 2008 2:31 pm ET

Earmarked 26.9 Million for a town if 7000
Led Ethics reform but under investigation
Reduced funding for a Museum and stopped a Library expansion but got a popular sports complex approved.

Wow, did she get her scout badge as well?? What a maverick!

Franky   September 3rd, 2008 2:31 pm ET

"People PLEASE STAY FOCUSED!
This is about the issues, McCain has embraced the policies of Bush. He has actually said that he would vote against his previous bills. I don't care about Palin's personal life, I want to know what is her vision for this country and it is the same ol same ol. She is a right wing nut!"

To be honest, my boy has been focusing on Senator McCain. Is the people in the shadows talking about Sarah. Plus, there are a lot of people living in the United States, is no secret! LOL!!!

Plus, the McCain campaign have been acting very eccentric...

PghBob   September 3rd, 2008 2:31 pm ET

I have been comparing news reports and commentaries across the various news outlets and what I see is a concerted effort to turn any small thing into a scandal. I don't know if this is driven by the newsies hunger for ratings or hunger for taking sides. When you see the usual suspects including the NYT and WP engage in it too.... it smells of media types trying to spin things for their own candidate. Obama may be a talented orator but he has not shown me substance. Palin is at least on par with him experience wise or better. A pregnant teen daughter is hardly a "scandal" in this day and age. I am sick of Wash DC insiders who lie to us and dont represent us. Palin is a breath of fresh air. I hope DC doesn't ruin her.

Jackson   September 3rd, 2008 2:31 pm ET

Politics is a full contact sport for both genders. If you are afraid of getting hit, stay off the grit iron. Obama has been getting slammed for two years....welcome to the big leagues rookie!!

TESAP:SAVANNAH, GA   September 3rd, 2008 2:31 pm ET

Can't take the heat............... get out of the race........ McCain was not up in arms when people attacked Obama's children........... DEAL WITH IT MCCAIN................

BARACK THE VOTE PEOPLE................. :)

Neutral   September 3rd, 2008 2:31 pm ET

Is Palin the presidential candidate or John McCain?
That old man still needs someone to whisper in his ears and give him advise. Where is this country going with these two, nowhere that fore sure.
She might have some experience in hunting moose and is just a show case for the rupublicans to bash Obama and take the attention off americas real problems.

Now the ship is sinking and the repubs are still lieing to the people to cover up their failed policies.

What a disgrace.

mark   September 3rd, 2008 2:31 pm ET

they put forth a woman with ZERO qualifications to step into the presidency at a moment's notice (with a running mate who would be the oldest president EVER) and they're surprised? come on! She's against stem cell research, ran a town of 7000 people and has been out of the country ONCE. She's our best and brightest? what's happening...

Brad K   September 3rd, 2008 2:31 pm ET

Paranoid much? Now it's all a vast media conspiracy?

The Republicans are losing all credibility with the American public with their transparently hyperbolic claims about Palin's experience. In a word, they're making fools of themselves.

Mike   September 3rd, 2008 2:30 pm ET

Watching Campbell Brown unprofessionally treat a McCain advisor while questioning him about Gov. Palin's experience was an obvious blatant attempt to demean Gov. Palin, and McCain's decision making. There is no way in hell Obama was treated like that when he first came out to run. A senator only 2 years when he officially announced, with VERY LITTLE foreign policy experience and no executive experience, he was given a free ride. Why? Because media people like Campbell Brown are so infatuated with Obama that they cannot see straight. Her knees quake whenever she thinks about Obama. CNN refused to apologize for Campbell Brown which shows utter ignorance or a conspiracy. Take your pick. Neither one is a very attractive choice, but they are the only choices. Not only does McCain have to overcome the dollars of Obama to get his message out, McCain also has to fight the free positive media for Obama and the negative media of himself and his running mate.

SC Obama Supporter   September 3rd, 2008 2:30 pm ET

This is comical. I'll tell you what...John Mccain may not know much about the economy, or how many houses he and Cindy have; he may not have known Sarah Palin before last Wed.,or how to complete a speech without using "my friends" as a verbal crutch, but he sure knows alot about how to lose a presidential campaign. He's got plenty of experience doing that. This election is his grand finale. Obama by a landslide....

Anon   September 3rd, 2008 2:30 pm ET

Palin is the dumbest VP pick in the history of the republic. We should THANK the media if they care enough to point out this fact.

charley   September 3rd, 2008 2:30 pm ET

I just love the way the left bloggers and the mainstream media keep bashing this great republican ticket. They are grasping at straws. The American voter will decide who wins on Nov 4. not them.

Laverne   September 3rd, 2008 2:30 pm ET

You republicans are such hypocrites. The way Michelle Obama was treated by the republicans and the media was a disgrace. Not once did McCain say hands off when it comes to family, but Obama defended Palin and her family. And if women should be treated equal then welcome to the REAL world of politics, she deserves the same scrutiny as all the others. The republicans hide behind their so called extreme social views that are suppose to be the gateway to heaven, but you never practice what you preach. After watching that memorial service of a convention last night, I am convinced that it is time to move in another direction! Thanks Repubs for opening up my eyes!

Obama/Biden!

Jan   September 3rd, 2008 2:30 pm ET

Chosing Sarah Palin was a brilliant move.

Democratic criticism of her in the form of....

1) not enough experience
2) too young
3) children to take care of

....only makes anyone with a bit of reflection realize what a misogynous culture we have. Children were never an issue with Obama or any other male candidate (the Kennedy's, with their hoard of children, comes to mind). Obama was briefly criticised as being too young and inexperienced, yet he won his primary, and his age and lack of experience seem to be accepted. However, for a woman to be too young, too inexperienced...and as a 2nd in command, no less is far less acceptable. I am surprised the media isn't criticising her for being too pretty or too feminine.

Clearly, Obama is TOO YOUNG and INEXPERIENCED....and Palin on the ticket forces everyone, like it or not, to realize we have forgiven these shortcomings in Obama...because he is charasmatic and a MAN.

Given this, I am a Democrat who is changing her vote to McCain. At least #1 will have the experience a president MUST have. Hopefully, Palin will have the time to learn as she goes and be prepared should the unlikely demise of McCain come about. I do not want my president to "learn as he goes", which is what Obama would HAVE to do.

TF   September 3rd, 2008 2:30 pm ET

I think Justin Timberlake wrote a good song for Steve Schmidt. It's called "Cry me a river". This is what you get when you vet you VP pick for only 15 mins.

I hope to God the guy she wrongfully fired has some emails or recording laying around.

Neal   September 3rd, 2008 2:30 pm ET

This is so hyperbolic as to belong more to a Soap Opera.

ben   September 3rd, 2008 2:30 pm ET

Does this mean that the press is no longer McCain's 'base'?
Toughen up, Johhny boy.

Ben in NM   September 3rd, 2008 2:30 pm ET

To the Republicans it doesn't matter, Palin will just be a puppet who will be told what to do by her handlers. She has a background in broadcasting, and hair that will cover the transmitter they'll put in her ear when she debates Biden and makes any kind of public appearance.

Lisa   September 3rd, 2008 2:29 pm ET

Ummm, vetting is what journalists should do. It's their job. Stop trying to avoid answering legitimate questions by calling it "Liberal Media Bashing".

McCain's selection of Sara Palin is an example of his reckless "Hail Mary" tactics.

McCain's pandering to the Right Wing with his selection of running mate has jeopardized National Security.. By choosing Sara Palin, McCain is pandering to the Right Wing. This results in the scary possibility of having a completely unseasoned politician step in his shoes.
1. McCain is the oldest running candidate
2. McCain has had 4 bouts of cancer
3. The VP position is the "heartbeat away"
"Do you want Sara Palin, a former beauty pageant contestant, a mom of 5 children, an inexperienced politician to have to deal with a Twin Towers situation? Would she have wisdom and diplomacy to deal with international crises? Without seasoned, proven advisors (like Biden)?" When McCain chose her for VP, the newscasters had word like "risky gamble". If you vote for McCain, do you want to have a risky gambler as YOUR president?” This is a very scary proposition.

How very Royal to pronounce that:
"The McCain campaign will have no further comment about our long and thorough process. This nonsense is over. ." The importance of a VP who can deal with diplomacy and knowlege is not "nonsense"..and the issue is FAR from "over".

David   September 3rd, 2008 2:29 pm ET

So . . . 10 years of Palin's 11 1/2 years of 'administrative experience' were over cities smaller than most public school districts. And this counts as administrative experience? Really?

heartlight 3, Maui, HI   September 3rd, 2008 2:29 pm ET

Vegas, what are you talking about? I never heard obama say anything against women that could reasonably be construed as an attack. You're making things up.

Lori, Houston Texas   September 3rd, 2008 2:29 pm ET

If Palin said NO to the VP offer, she'd still be the unknown Gov of Alaska. She's the one who brought the media scrutiny upon her family. And if McSame had actually VETTED her properly, no one would be voicing their varied opinions of her and her famiy now. Can't blame the dems or media on this one, repubs. You own this one.

Ann   September 3rd, 2008 2:29 pm ET

BACHELOR DEGREE DOE THAT QUALIFY FOR VP WITH ZERO EXPERIENCE

WE JUST NEED HER TO ANSWER QUSTIONS SPECIFICALLY THAT ALL I CANNOT BUY AN ITEM WITHOUT SEEN IT

gl   September 3rd, 2008 2:29 pm ET

The only person to blame for this scrutiny Palin is receive from the media is John McCain for not vetting her longer than 5 mintues.
She will be a heart beat away from being our next President so all far and game!

Jim   September 3rd, 2008 2:29 pm ET

Obama will not comment, because his own mother was unwed and pregnant with him at age 17. He is a smart man to stay out of it while the angry leftist media circles around the Mccain camp.

D   September 3rd, 2008 2:29 pm ET

People People, Palin is nothing but a smokescreen. Repubs got everyone in a frenzy over this woman and no one is paying attention to the fact that McCain still hasnt addressed any ISSUES. Not the media, not the bloggers, no one! What is McCain's plan? Im trying to be objective here, and take in everyones opinion, but all im getting is his service to the states. But wait, wasn't it the repubs that trashed John Kerry in 04', never once honoring his service to the states? This is a joke! Palin is a joke, Mccain is a joke, Bush is a joke! and if we aren't careful America will be a SERIOUS joke to all who watch...or are we already? Its so rediculous geeze I can just poke myself in the eye with a pencil!

jason   September 3rd, 2008 2:29 pm ET

if there was a media scandal, they wouldn't publish his opinion that it was a media scandal...

funny how he didn't object when attacks at Obama were comming from every which way...

Steve - southern Illinois   September 3rd, 2008 2:29 pm ET

I'm not crazy about quoting Jesse Ventura. But he was right on when he mentioned on Larry King last night how the Repbulicans spent the entire campaign in 2004 trashing John Kerry, a Vietnam War Hero. Now that they have the war hero their argument for anything negative about McCain is that he was a P.O.W.

Ernest Morgan Longview WA   September 3rd, 2008 2:29 pm ET

How come the media is not talking about the church video of Sara Palin, and the video commercial with High School kids that looks like a cult, seems like they are afraid to go after her the way they did Obama and these are word out of her own mouth.

Questioning   September 3rd, 2008 2:29 pm ET

Yes, blame the media, blame the democrats, blame America because they simply will not accept your VP political nominee. Get upset with American woman because all of us "did not fall in love with her story as a mother." An issue the republican party introduced. Get upset with Americans who question her stance on abstinence only education. Get upset with Americans who refuse to accept that her experience as governor is enough when the republican party first ran as the party of "experience."
I will not be chastised by this campaign for seeking out my own information. For too long the Bush administration told the American people not to question, but merely accept their word because they knew what was best. Well, you better believe that this independent will question and will continue to question both parties and at the moment, the democratic party is the only one providing answers whether I like them or not.

eye's of the wise   September 3rd, 2008 2:28 pm ET

Give me a break Mccain, you are alway's whining about media coverage when it does not favor Mccain, Obama has been vilified for all sort's of issue's and I have not heard him complain not once, this is certainly time of change, all of a sudden white people are crying racism (geraldine ferraro) and sexism but for year's have been telling black men and women to stop crying and get over these issue's, for the Mccain camp to say that the media is just trying to destroy the V.P pick because she is a woman is another case of Mccain losing his bearing's and showing he does not have the temperment to be President

The Republicans are comedic GOLD!   September 3rd, 2008 2:28 pm ET

Well she does have that non-sexist beauty pagent experience backing her up.

teddy of orlando   September 3rd, 2008 2:28 pm ET

GARBAGE – SIT HER DOWN IN THE SITUATION ROOM WITH WOLF AND SEE IF SHE IS EVERYTHING THE GOP IS SAYING SHE IS ..... MY GUES IS I DOUBT IT

Soldiergal   September 3rd, 2008 2:28 pm ET

Raising questions about qualifications is hardly sexist. These are the same people who think that because Barack Obama knows a former member of the Weather Underground, he is practically a domestic terrorist. Personally, I'm more interested in knowing how Mrs. Palin could slash funding for teenage mothers' programs and support abstinence-only educations, given the reality of teenage pregnancy both nationwide and at home. Clearly the abstinence program doesn't work, as study after study has proven.

Noans, South Pasadena   September 3rd, 2008 2:28 pm ET

No one in the press is "bashing" Palin. They're just doing their job... finding out who she is, what she's voted for and against... and how she's governed. The Republicans are pulling their hypocritical crap, again. Remember, these are the same Republicans who called Michelle and Barack, "unpatriotic", not to mention other false slurs. I think it's great that we have a woman on the ticket but the question is, "Is Sarah Palin qualified to be VP?" That's a legitimate question. McCain has a history of serious skin cancer, but wouldn't allow the press, like Cheney, to study his health records thoroughly. So far we know that Palin wants to overturn Roe versus Wade; believes in creationism that should be taught on schools; doesn't believe we have a climate crisis; doesn't believe sex education, including abstinence, should be taught in schools and that polar bears, who are dying because of the melting polar caps, should be taken off the endangered list. McCain appears to have picked Palin in a panic after the DNC convention so of course the press and public are going to ask questions to find out who Palin is and what she really stands for, so stop whining, Republicans. The press vetted Obama and Michelle and Palin and her husband will get the same vetting. Stop your whining and use of the patriotic card. We're all patriotic, Democrats, Republicans and Independents and we have a right to know who we are voting for or against!

mary   September 3rd, 2008 2:28 pm ET

If you want media to leave family out of it don't bring the Boyfriend along!!!!!

ChuChu Rocket   September 3rd, 2008 2:28 pm ET

John McCain picked his VP, now it is time for "the Maverick" to stand up for his judgment. (Or the lack of)

steve   September 3rd, 2008 2:28 pm ET

Wait until the swarm of journalist decending on Alaska start to find out what the McCain camp didn't bother to find out about her. Somebody has to inform the public. We can't just sit back and swallow the MCain spin. And it's not about Bristol – it's about Sarah and her wacko fundamentalists ideas, abuse of office and complete lack of qualifications for VP.

Marcia Rowley   September 3rd, 2008 2:28 pm ET

FACT: Obama is running on "change" but yet the FIRST executive decision he makes after becoming the nominee is to appoint a blow hard Washington insider - WAKE UP Democrats. MCCain/Palin are the two that will demand change. Most Eems DO NOT KNOW THE FACTS - when I ask WHY Dems are supporting him - they say "change" but when pressed they don't even know what that means. Don't just vote for Obama because he gives a good speech. He has NO foreign policy experience and his the running for PRESIDENT - He is going to raise taxes (regardless of what he says) he has LESS experience and ZERO credibility once you look at the FACTS not the empty words. We need McCain/Palin to envoke change.

Patty   September 3rd, 2008 2:28 pm ET

OK smart people – just what woman would be good – good enough for anyone????? I doubt that there is any one woman that would satidfy anyone of you hateful, disgusting people. You just love to rip em up because you can't face them and look them in the eyes and blog the crap you do on here.

PA Independent Against Hypocrisy   September 3rd, 2008 2:28 pm ET

The ghost of Lee Atwater rides again.....

Talk about the party of old ideas, they are running the 1988 campaign all over again. Too bad for them the American people saw it before and are wise to it now.

Mark C-Virginia-US Navy Retired-ProObama   September 3rd, 2008 2:27 pm ET

Hey CNN did this story get sent to you by Faux News, come on guys. There is alot of smoke, aleast go look for the fire.

Debbie   September 3rd, 2008 2:27 pm ET

We all know (whether you are a Democrat or Republican) that the media has pandered to the Obama campaign. WE, the people, are all talking about it. It's been said on the news, etc., so – why deny it? No matter who you are for – Obama has had pretty much a free ride with this campaign. And, for voters like me – I am really, really confused about why both parties could not have put up better candidates. Are we that desperate in this country to put up this group of people for the highest office in the country?

Bla Bla Bla   September 3rd, 2008 2:27 pm ET

Obama has textbook knowledge but he doesn't have any real world experience. He's all TALK. Which he's very good at btw but he's not ready to lead this country by no means.

Thank you McCain   September 3rd, 2008 2:27 pm ET

Way to go McCain, tell us like it is.

We can vet the candidate for vice president in the voting booth, when we vote for her. Stupid people asking questions.

After all, we already know she's got some skills on the court, is an excellent marksman, and that her daughter is pregnant, all relevant concerns I want answered when considering whose hands to put my life in for the possible next 8 years.

And foreign policy experience? Alaska is near Russia!!!
Palin has been the quiet sentinel of the Bering Strait for 20 months now!!! Cuz let's face it, if we're gonna be invaded, Russia is coming through Alaska. And Canada.

wskee   September 3rd, 2008 2:27 pm ET

Obama has said he will fire anyone in his campaign who addresses the issue of Palin's daughter. How is he attacking their family ? (directed at "Vegas" above...maybe what happens in Vegas' head should stay in Vegas' head)

Rob   September 3rd, 2008 2:27 pm ET

Obama needs to hammer home the fact that he's been under intense scrutiny and bashing by the Republicans for 18 months. I think most normal Americans realize this and realize the hypocrisy here. How dare the Republicans protest our need to know more about a potential VP that we know for all of 5 days and seems to have some baggage. How dare they. They make me sick to my stomach.

CNN POST!

Chris, PA   September 3rd, 2008 2:27 pm ET

It's unfair to focus on "how she will raise her children." I don't recall any MAN running for public office being asked these questions. However, it is also unfair for her to exploit her own daughter for the sake of the right wing agenda.

As a Hillary supporter who splits ticket every election, neither side seems to be working very hard for my vote. The way I see it, the choice is between one side wanting to take away all my money and the other side wanting to take away all my rights. How pathetic in these very serious times.

Ibis Robinson   September 3rd, 2008 2:27 pm ET

Am I being weird in asking this? I remember when I had my kids, I never wanted to put them down. My husband and I used to fight over who got to hold the baby! At four months of age, Palin's baby is always being held by her daughter. Certainly when Palin is making speeches, etc. she obviously can't hold the baby, but it struck me as really weird this morning when they took a family photo that the daughter was still holding the baby!!! Is that what happens when you give birth to so many kids? You lose interest in loving and holding them and it becomes natural to hand them off to an older sibling? They say the bond between mother and child is exteremely important, particularly in the first few months. Ancient societies had women strapping babies to their backs and chests in order to keep mother and child together while moms worked in fields. Our modern day backpacks hold our babies close to our bodies while we hike, shop etc. for much the same reasons. Why on earth does this woman not hold her baby? She portrays herself as a family values candidate...and believe me I have serious concerns and issues about her so called values and her parenting abilities, but aside from all that I can't for the life of me understand why she or her husband don't hold the baby and it is always in the arms of it's older sister!

Jazzplayer   September 3rd, 2008 2:27 pm ET

If y'all had done your job, then the media wouldn't need to do it for you. After 8 years of facts being hidden, lied about and covered up in every possible way, do you honestly expect this country to take what you say a face value? It's our job to question. If you were so proud and happy with her values, background, experience, etc. – then y'all should have disclosed ALL of it when the decision was announced. Don't get mad cuz y'all got caught, yet again, with your pants down around your ankles.

Tony   September 3rd, 2008 2:27 pm ET

So in other words, we're supposed to shut up and not scrutinize her at all, even though she will be the second most powerful person on earth. Why? Oh, because she's a woman. Who is being sexist here?

NoMcSame No ReThuglicans   September 3rd, 2008 2:26 pm ET

Can you say unfit mother? I can. If Hillary's daughter would have come up with a bun in the oven all hell would have broken loose. Good Job Hillary and Bill for raising such a fine daughter.

Jesse   September 3rd, 2008 2:26 pm ET

When your platform is not to teach on safe sex and your own daugther gets pregnant it makes a person wonder about their homelife.

Quinn - Houston, Texas   September 3rd, 2008 2:26 pm ET

The media can't even interview her. McCain is keeping her in a cone of protection.

Thank God for the media. SOMEONE has to vet this woman. One day (within the next 4 years) she may be our president.

Very Scary!!!!!

joel   September 3rd, 2008 2:26 pm ET

All the things that are being reported are true. So what is there to be defensive about. It's not like people are making up lies about her. These are all facts and documented facts at that. McCain did a poor job of selecting a running mate just like he would do a poor job of running the country. And when someone calls you on a mistake you say I'm not talking anymore. Well that sounds just like a guy they call W.

Do you really think that if Joe Biden's wife belonged to a secessionist group we would ever hear the end of it. But Palin's husband was a member of such a group and it barely gets mentioned.

Palin has a lot more skeletons in her closet and they will come out eventually and McSame will have nobody to blame but himself.

Ed   September 3rd, 2008 2:26 pm ET

I am a moron who voted for bush twice and I will never in my lifetime vote for a republican again. Furthermore I recall John Kerry being a war hero but the lifeless republicans spun him into a traitor, and I felt so bad for him. So here I when I say how is somebody a war hero when they just get shot down over Vietnam by chance? I thought republicans were all about the family and yet Palin must have turned her back on her kid because she went out and got knocked as 17 year old, how pathetic?

Swing Voter in Virginia   September 3rd, 2008 2:26 pm ET

People PLEASE STAY FOCUSED!
This is about the issues, McCain has embraced the policies of Bush. He has actually said that he would vote against his previous bills. I don't care about Palin's personal life, I want to know what is her vision for this country and it is the same ol same ol. She is a right wing nut!

NoMcSame No ReThuglicans   September 3rd, 2008 2:26 pm ET

Can you say unfit mother? I can. If Hillary's daughter would have come up with a bun in the oven all hell would have broken loose. Goot Job Hillary and Bill for raising such a fine daughter.

Independent   September 3rd, 2008 2:26 pm ET

The role of the media is to scrutinize the candidates.
Why was Palin a surprise pick? Because she lacks experience.
Why was Obama a dark horse? Because he lacks experience.
But Obama has been managing his campaign brilliantly, better than any other candidate. That takes organization and planning and the ability to delegate to good people.

The campaigns that complain are the ones not getting the job done–poor organization, bad judgement, including poor selection of key people. They try to shift the blame to someone else.

For the president, the buck stop here. No complaints, just get the job done.

Pa Voter   September 3rd, 2008 2:25 pm ET

Love the Repubs' mis-information/distraction efforts, appear to work for that group in attendance last night.
Steve Schmidt, {a former senior adviser for President Bush's 2004 re-election team} knows that republican voters prefer the "Dumbed down" talk. One thing for sure, he knows how to get dumb guys elected to political office

How many houses do you have John MCCain? "I was a POW".
Great , Just Great!

average woman   September 3rd, 2008 2:25 pm ET

She is quite a woman with many accomplishments. She is running for # 2 in the nation. If she is as strong as Hilary, she will survive these attacks. Now days if you run for office someone will try to ruin you for life with rummers. She should not be treated as the weaker sex and immune from the type of slander that is common in all political campaigns just because she is a woman.

Pecos45   September 3rd, 2008 2:25 pm ET

Steve Schmidt: Another old white guy.
That's all the Republicans are today, the party of old white guys with no new ideas.
Shut up and sit down.
Lead, or leave.
I am in Thomas Jefferson's camp on this. If the government is not responsive, it is the right of the people to overthrow it and establish a new one.
I'm ready to vote for anyone except a Republican.

Tommy   September 3rd, 2008 2:25 pm ET

This is a joke. The hypocrisy of the Repubs.
if Barack Obama say" they are going to portray as someone scary"
you accuse him play the race card
When someone inquire about Palin
You are a sexist,
Even accuse Obama campaign of blogging
Repub leader Palin is a crusader for abstinence, daughter is pregnancy instead of saying we are all human, errors happen
Repubs reply" if it was Obama's daughter , he would aborted it"
Does the GOP take responsibility for anything, instead of blaming others. What cowards

He using Palin as scapegoat to cover up the real issues o f the american people , even Rick Davis say this election is not about issues.
My respect for John McCain had died, his pursuit for presidency outweighs his country first slogan. There is noway Palin even as she is being tutor by the Bush people is ready for North Korea , Mid East, Russia. I know Doochey and Cindy McCain claim Palin has foriegn policy experience due to Alaska being close to Russia.

What I find disturbing about John McCain is his temperament, disrepect to women( calling his wife a c5nt. What kinda of man refers to his wife that way

Andy   September 3rd, 2008 2:25 pm ET

Oh..and go online and look at the Anchorage newspaper where it says none of the people that should have been were contacted about this VP pick.

Jim   September 3rd, 2008 2:25 pm ET

It is really amazing how they have been reporting this issue. Even on CNN...putting Jamie Lynn Spears next to a picture of Palin's daughter. Very negative coverage. Commentary is now becoming front page "News" on CNN and other liberal news sources.

Marc PDX   September 3rd, 2008 2:25 pm ET

If it was a male candidate who had a baby OR a 17 year old pregnant daughter, this would be a story for about 24 hours max. But since it's a woman it's a major outcry. The Democrats and the liberal MSM are NOT so tolerant or diversity-friendly after all. But they are Hypocrites big time!

Merlin Cambrensis   September 3rd, 2008 2:25 pm ET

It's not about Sarah Palin – whoever she is.

It's about John McCain's screwing up the most important decision of his Presidential campaign.

Let's not let the spinmeisters deflect us from what's really crucial to our country.

boss will   September 3rd, 2008 2:25 pm ET

John McCain is 72 years old with health problems and he picks A VP withe out vetting her. Palin has to be in study hall every day 24/7 for 2 months the to learn about the world she lives in. The one thing we learned about 9/11 was we need A President with good judgement McCcain gets a F for picking a VP with training wheels she can not even do a interview . The F is for putting politics before his country

go Obama

Patricia Weller, Westminster, Maryland   September 3rd, 2008 2:25 pm ET

First, after knowing what I now know -

- Palin is an unknown
-Palin's claim to foreign policy experience is that Alaska is close to Russia
- Palin wants creationism taught in schools
- Palin wants abstinence only taught in schools
- Palin has a record of firing people for dubious reasons
- Palin is of the fanatical religious right variety

then I would have to say that IF IT IS TRUE that there are Democratic feminists who refuse to vote for Obama and instead will vote for McCain BECAUSE he has Palin on the ticket, those women are NOT the sharpest tools in the shed. I say "if it is true" because it sounds like something, among a whole lot of somethings, that was cooked up by Karl Rove.

Second, what's the true story about Palin and her claim of garnering the "Ms Congeniality" title in a beauty contest? Did she lie in her bio or what?

Third, can you just imagine what James Dobson, Focus on the Family, the fanatical religious right, would have said if Chelsea Clinton would have gotten pregnant at 17? They would have gone on and on about the moral decay of our country and no family values, etc., etc. I believe children of politicians are off limits, too, but the hypocrisy of the GOP base needs to be highlighted nonetheless.

OBAMA-BIDEN '08

Ann   September 3rd, 2008 2:25 pm ET

It's only been two weeks , what will happen over the next 60 days if she can't stand this? I feel comfortable meeting her future son in law this lad sounds charming

Jesse--Maryland   September 3rd, 2008 2:25 pm ET

For those of you who keep claiming that McCain didn't vet Palin, I only say this:

PROVE IT. Show us evidence. Give us a reason to believe you other than, "I don't like her, and I don't like McCain!"

Shrill accusations without evidence do nothing but cloud the issue, and they say more about the accuser than the accused.

Ex-Republican for Obama   September 3rd, 2008 2:25 pm ET

Does one or two days qualify as a "long and thorough search"?

POD, Atlantic City, NJ   September 3rd, 2008 2:25 pm ET

The only question is the following: Are John McCain, Barack Obama and Joe Biden subject to the same high ....or low....level of scrutiny by the media. If the answer is yes then it is fair. If the answer is no then it is not fair.

Gary Moore   September 3rd, 2008 2:25 pm ET

The republican party wants the US media to leave Sarah Palin alone and stop picking on her because she's a girl. What is going to happen when she has to face real problems in the world? Terrorist don't beleive in women's rights. They also don't want her family involved, but parade them around at every chance they get. Her daughter is seventeen, where was the parenting? The conservative religious leaders are turning a blind eye to this.

Dave   September 3rd, 2008 2:24 pm ET

Are you republicans blind, deaf and dumb?
Obama is not even in this article. Obama is not attacking Palin's personal life or the situation with her children. He said months ago that the candidates families should be off limits for political tools, and he again stated that when the issue of Palin's children came up. He's not attacking her family at all.
McCain is ticked off at the media checking into Palin's troubled political history. She backed and is being backed by dirty politicians that are being investigated. She is being investigated for her own issues.
The Obama campaigns only comments is that McCain has been talking all about experience and blasting Obama for a lack of experience....and then McCain (the oldest and most medically unsound person to ever run for president) picks someone who has virtually NO political history besides charges of corruption and abuse of power.

McCain has not been able to say word one to Obama about Palin because Obama has been a perfect gentleman about the issues sorrounding her. McCain is just ticked off at the media for trying to do their jobs.

terri   September 3rd, 2008 2:24 pm ET

Is Bristol in school? Is Levi? Are they going to stay in school – finish high school, go to college? I am just having a hard time dealing with this – I have two kids and I want to encourage them to stay in school and get a full education – hopefully without having babies until after they graduate and get married – is there something wrong with that nowadays? I guess I'm just old-fashioned. It's distressing to me – the Republicans and all hugging and happy. Does anyone understand what I mean? How do you explain this to your kids when they are watching it on TV?

Amelia   September 3rd, 2008 2:24 pm ET

When I heard the announcement that Sarah would be our VP candidate I felt physically sick because my first thought was "What wil happen to us if McCain dies?" Doesn't he care enough about us to make sure there will be a qualified person to carry on? What about US?

NotFallingInLine.org   September 3rd, 2008 2:24 pm ET

Carly Fiorina just said that the leadership of the Democratic Party faied to denounce the media’s gender bias against Hillary Clinton AND THAT THE LEADERSHIP OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY WON’T STAND BY AND LET SEXIST ATTACKS AGAINST SARAH PALIN GO UNANSWERED.

It's hard to count the ways in which the Palin choice is so perfect politically…

The leadership of the Democratic Party failed us all.

Foreign observer   September 3rd, 2008 2:24 pm ET

It is worst that an ambitious Barrakuda as she was called by a Republican will not hesitate to throw anybody and any good idea under the bus just to receive and to keep her power.

Andy   September 3rd, 2008 2:24 pm ET

PHIL TEXAS – What are you smoking down there? How can you jump on the Palin bandwagon with so little information about her? Is it because she can dress out a moose or shoot a rifle. Important knowledge to have for the jobs you are putting her in.

Please give this matter serious thought and do some research. OK?

Anne/stone mountain Ga   September 3rd, 2008 2:24 pm ET

To VEGAS..and any body else.... When have you heard Obama attacking women or children.???? Dont believe everything you hear. Tell me a time through out the primary and until now that he's done that? You can't

Kevin Leo (Jonesboro, GA)   September 3rd, 2008 2:24 pm ET

McCain's camp has to be the most hypocritical, two-faced campaign in the history of politics. When Barack defends himself, he is accused of playing the race card. As soon as people question his ridiculous VP choice, they cry sexism!!! He claims he is putting country first but pulls a rabbit out of the hat to pick Palin!

Even if the Palin selection was not based on her gender, is she truly the best that the GOP has to offer?!?!

Candice   September 3rd, 2008 2:24 pm ET

So the Dems are running scared, and have pulled out all the stops on this one. They promoted state governors in the past – anybody remember Bill Clinton? But now a governor is not qualified. Puleeze. And what about the Dem's attack dogs memo on Politico, page now pulled, where they documented their attack strategy and even stole (and partially published) Palin's social security number. How low can the democrats go? Why are only Democrat families off limits, but not Palin's?

Sal   September 3rd, 2008 2:24 pm ET

she's NOT QUALIFIED, that's why for the scrutiny

mark   September 3rd, 2008 2:24 pm ET

Its not about the canned speeches written by Rove, its about a broken republican party and platform and its candidates (both of them) decision-making process. They made an decision making and experience an issue not the dems. Careful what you wish for, the American public is not as dumb as Schmidt and Rove think they are. For their sake, they better hope their relationships with those Florida and Ohio voting machine company's holds up.

Chris, Tustin CA   September 3rd, 2008 2:24 pm ET

Palin's first child was born eight (8) months after her elopement.
Apparently that apple didn't fall far from the tree.
McCain married Cindy one month after he divorced Carol.

When did the DEMS become the Values Party?

Newly Independent   September 3rd, 2008 2:24 pm ET

In response to SERIOUSLY:

You do realize you are comparing the Dem Pres candidate to the Rep VP Candidate? Maybe you should be comparing Obama to McCain, and not Obama to Palin???

Seems like the top of the Dem ticket is lacking, evidenced by Obama's choosing of Biden... Don't you think?

andrew s. rostolder   September 3rd, 2008 2:24 pm ET

if the shoe were on the other foot i'm sure the r n c would not wish to talk about it.........................NOT

NYC Independent   September 3rd, 2008 2:24 pm ET

This was to be expected. McCain does not like or care for anyone including the media, that disagrees with him. Questioning him is also something that just isn't done in his world. He has been censoring the media all during his primary and post-primary campaign and on many accounts the media has obliged him. He has not received and equitable amount of negative coverage as studies have shown. Now, he's furious because he is finally getting a feel of what objective media attention is all about. Senator Obama has had every hair on his head reviewed, examined and studied. Now its McCain and Palin's turn. Welcome to the real world.

PCL   September 3rd, 2008 2:23 pm ET

Obama has spent nearly two years under intense media scrutiny. He has been researched by both the Clinton and McCain campaigns looking for dirt. Despite the attempt by the Republicans to use the "Jedi Mind Trick" on us by saying that Palin is qualified, we need to use what is left of the campaign season to find out who she is.

There has already been so much dirt, I am sure the Republicans are sorry they did not go with Romney or Pawlenty. This dirt is going to dog her into November.

Gary   September 3rd, 2008 2:23 pm ET

THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH GENDER!

Maybe the GOP should have vetted her a little (maybe alot) more carefully. They took a risk with Palin, hoping to lure disgruntled Clinton supporters. The only problem with that: she is NOT Hillary Clinton and True Clinton supporters find it an insulting form of pandering.

Kari from a farm in Wisconsin   September 3rd, 2008 2:23 pm ET

We have a 50/50 chance of having McCain as President. McCain has a very good chance of a return of malignant melonoma (trust me, been there, done that with my mother – who died from that cancer). Who wants to take ANY chance of an unvetted V.P. candidate who recently asked, "What does a V.P. do?", leading our country through economic, international and environmental plight? Not me...I will vote for Obama/Biden.

Frank   September 3rd, 2008 2:23 pm ET

I guess that this is a complaint that we should all take seriously.

After all, if anyone knows a "faux media scandal" its the Republicans. In fact, its what they specialize in.

JC   September 3rd, 2008 2:23 pm ET

Methinks the Republican machine doth protest too much...what are they afraid is out there about Palin? Probably a lot, since none of her colleagues or friends in Alaska were even called about her background and policies. It is also offensive that McCain's people will think that anyone will fall for their carefully chosen phrasing - claiming she has more "governing experience" than Obama. Well, yes, as a governor, she does. All of 22 months. And more than McCain. Her public position has been inconsistent; she is a known supporter of Alaska's secession, yet now wants to be for uniting America. Please. Her nomination was another of McCain's "hasty decisions" and now the RNC has to live with it.

KDH   September 3rd, 2008 2:23 pm ET

Why do the dems say the vetting was not good enough? Are they saying that a woman with a pregnant teen age daughter cannot be the VP? Rediculous.

c   September 3rd, 2008 2:23 pm ET

go to mediatakeout.com for pictures of sarah palins daughter and her behavior then tell me she can run her family and the whitehouse.

Rob K.   September 3rd, 2008 2:23 pm ET

As an independent that left the republican party, they are just covering up a huge tactical error by McCain. He screwed up big time by panicing and nominating someone with so little known about her and her track record.
Executive experience??? Then I should be ruler of the world. Are you kidding me???
The VP for McCain is extremely important. His bad health serves a continual reminder that Palin will likely lead this country during his term in office if elected. If George Bush is unqualified think about the disaster that awaits us.

GOP- out to lunch for the past 8 years and now promises to be "out of touch" for the next four years.

Vote McCain/Palin if you hate this country and want to see it fail. Join the crazy Pumas!

McLame Lays An Egg   September 3rd, 2008 2:23 pm ET

Cindy and Sarah, the perfect women for a cowardly bully who has temper tantrums and lies to the American people. He lied when he said the American people are excited about Sarah. What American people? We don't know Sarah, and neither does he. John talked to her for all of 15 minutes, and while I understand his heart couldn't take more than 15 minutes on the phone with a beauty queen who's (not wife), our standards are different.

I want the media to take her through the wringer, because John doesn't know her. So somebody is going to have to be an adult.

Not that I'm keeping score, but Sarah was selected last Friday, 6 days later we are still talking about her, and not in a good way. I'd say Barack made the best choice and one that Americans can understand.

Obama/Biden 08

McCain/Palin 0-Never

CW   September 3rd, 2008 2:23 pm ET

Truth: Palin is a liability. Let's hope she'll drop out! Betting is at 12% chance right now.

Brian in VA   September 3rd, 2008 2:23 pm ET

Republicans accuse democrats of being socialist. What do you call it when you push moral and religious values on others and call it law? C-O-M-M-U..........

Rich   September 3rd, 2008 2:23 pm ET

To use Palin's own words about the complaints regarding the examination or criticism of a candidate's background, it is "whining."

Monica Harvard   September 3rd, 2008 2:23 pm ET

How can some Democrats talk about scandal with the likes of Bill Clinton who cheated on his wife in the oval office orTed Kennedy who was involved in a very mysterious cover up of a young woman's death? You may not agree with Palin's politics but she lives what she believes and as a Democrat, I respect that – plus the Republicans listened to what American's want – a woman in one of the top jobs. We almost had that and blew it.

laurie   September 3rd, 2008 2:23 pm ET

Hmmm...wonder if her speech will mention her involvement in AIP, the separatist group that strives to have Alaska secede from the United States (including her videotaped speech for their 2008 convention–) -Country First, right?

Kat, Huntington, West Virginia   September 3rd, 2008 2:23 pm ET

to Seriously! If you want to make sure everyone sees the facts then make sure you have the facts. BO was not a US for 4 years. He has barely been working in the senate for over 100 days before he became a full time presidential candidate. And, no matter how much you want to pretend that his educational pedigree makes him more qualified let me remind you that W has a degree from Yale!! And we all know how that turned out!
McKinney 08

tlhwraith   September 3rd, 2008 2:23 pm ET

Lol, oh what irony.

The only thing more sad than McCains whining is the fact that people come on blogs and such and defend him and Palin!

Honestly, we know next to nothing about Sarah Palin, yet the GOP operatives are dutifully defending this woman hand over fist. Most of them don't know her, haven't worked with her, anything (and blgo commentors know even less). All they are doing is defending "their team" against "our team".

At what point is someone in the GOP going to step up and say that Palin may not have been the best choice and that trying to spin their way out of it only hurts us as a nation. I don't have a problem with Sarah Palin per-se, I don't know her, but for some to show such fanatic devotion to someone that is so new is kind of scary.

I say let the media do their job. This lady is signing up to have the second most powerful position on the planet, not to run a PTA. If she can't stand the media scrutiny, charter her a plane back to Alaska and be done with it.

In the meantime, spare us the false outrage and the "what about Obama" diversions? If you want to be constructive GOP operatives, stop using talking points and start looking out for the best interests of us a nation. We need competant leadership not a bunch of spin-doctors trying to turn maneur into gold.

Cecil   September 3rd, 2008 2:23 pm ET

Fair game. If you bring a total unknown into your campaign, you must expect that SOMEONE will need to inform the public about them.

Since the McCain campaign believes the public is on a strictly need-to-know basis when it comes to Palin's background and "qualifications", the media is left to do the digging themselves.

Since when has any public figure running for office been off-limits to public scrutiny? Equal rights means equal responsibilities... every candidate faces the same scrutiny.

Obviously, those with skeletons in the closet have the most to fear from the process. It sucks that Palin's family is getting the rake here, but she made the decision to run, and her past seems to be outpacing her.

Campbell Brown is a hero   September 3rd, 2008 2:23 pm ET

...and an inspiration to real journalists everywhere.

A lot of folks who pretend to be journalists would be well-advised to stop acting like stenographers and actually ask some intelligent questions like she did.

The Rector   September 3rd, 2008 2:23 pm ET

Everyone of you needs a lesson in civics. The office of the president is, by design, very weak. The real power of the federal government lies in the House and the Senate, while the supreme court hold us all hostage. There is not much difference between the parties when it comes right down to it. Sure they will all say what their respective supporters want to hear during the campaign, then give themselves a raise and go on vacation for five years. Read The Declaration of Independance, the scarriest part is, then as now, the userper at the head of the corrupt government is George the second. To para-phrase...it is their right, it is their duty to throw off such government and provide new guards for their future security... The entire system is broken and those in a position to change it are not willing to do so.
It's been two hundred and thirty years, it's time to update this patheticaly antiquated sestem of government so it can represent the people, instead of the Bankers, and the landed gentry. And by the way neither of the two parties has ever garnered more than thirty percent of the electorate, that fact alone tells you how disenfranchised the American people are.

Therese   September 3rd, 2008 2:22 pm ET

If you can't take the heat get out of the kitchen. If the McCain campaign is going to select an inexperienced person whom no one knows to be the VP and potentially be the most powerful women on the planet, they also need to believe the media is going to have a field day. This is America... But I seem to remember when Obama was still in the primary and negative media attention was being thrust on him the Republicans were all for it. You can't have it both ways people. In the end it will be up to the American people to see if she can deliver.

Carol   September 3rd, 2008 2:22 pm ET

OK GUYS, youv'e had your FUN ? Now let's get on with the election process. It's not about Sarah's family it's about her record and WHAT SHE CAN DO FOR THE COUNTRY AND ALL AMERICANS. Media heads, – go out and get real jobs or try to inform the public about the REAL issues here. We are looking to pick a President who has choosen his running mate. Start thinking about what the candidates have accomplished and what they CAN accomplish in the next term. THINK about the set up of the Senate and Congress and what the relationship with the President will be. Will they be able to get business sucessfully accomplished? That is the REAL issue here.

Karen on Cape Cod   September 3rd, 2008 2:22 pm ET

Since when don't people have the right to scrutinize a WANNA BE Vice Presidential candidate?

Howard316   September 3rd, 2008 2:22 pm ET

How can a person who wanted Alaska to be separate from the Union be a vice-president? She didn't want to be a U.S. citizen at some point. She left the mayor's office in debt while she came into it with zero debt. That shows how she can manage mismanagement. She's under investigation right now for firing a state official over no good reason. She just can't be a VP for this country, and McCain needs to do something else, otherwise this is a free ride for Obama/Biden to White House. McCain team is extra vulnerable now from attacks by Democrats.

Nia Hussein- Phoenix, AZ   September 3rd, 2008 2:22 pm ET

p.s....it's okay for the media to bash Obama with lies created by the GOP, but it's not oaky for the media to actually do some incestigative reporting on Palin who has a few skelotons in her closet. It is not okay to vet the POW either cause well he is a POW, so no negative news at all on him. Just keep cranking out GOP lies on Obama...Something is about to come flying out of the closet on Palin and they are trying to attack the media now too quite them down before it makes headlines

READY...FIRE...AIM...MCCAIN   September 3rd, 2008 2:22 pm ET

O YEA AMERICA THIS IS THE MAN WE WANT AT THE HELM ???

A GOOD DOG CATCHER WOULD MAKE BETTER DECISIONS.

YOU MEAN TO TELL ME, OF ALL THE REPUBLICAN LEADERS

PALIN WAS THE BEST CHOICE FOR VP ???

MCNOTHING IS OUT OF HIS FEEBLE SENILE OLD MIND.

Toughguy   September 3rd, 2008 2:22 pm ET

The republicans are such frauds. They say one thing and do another, and who is this guy Schmidth to say that he don't want to hear anymore about Palin. He can tell her to go back to Alaska if she want to get away from the heat. Americans have the right to know everything about the person that may end up running our country. I say find out as much as they can and expose it. They did it to Obama and she is no different, no matter how much they whine.

Oboma/Biden 08

C.K., MN   September 3rd, 2008 2:22 pm ET

Isn't it the Media's job to scrutinize a profile of Presidential or Vice Presidential candidate? The voters need to know everything about an individual candidate so they can make informed decision which candidate they should vote for.

The RNC don't want informed citizens, they want ignorant citizens as usual...

Paul, Atlanta   September 3rd, 2008 2:22 pm ET

Rubbish! Sarah Palin has a very shady past and was only selected because McCain couldn't get anyone else to join his trip to nowhere. You betcha the media (and the rest of us) are going to scrutinize her. This woman is a fluff piece and nothing more. Even my most die-hard Tepublican friends think that McCain needs his medication adusted. He had so many highly qualified men and women he could have tapped and he went will this? Give me a break!

Marc PDX   September 3rd, 2008 2:22 pm ET

Totally SAD and totally hypocritical. The media and some factions of the Democratic party want to destroy Sarah Palin for the crime of being a woman and a republican. Come to think of it these same groups destroyed another woman, Hillary Rodham Clinton, for the crime of ?? what? Just being a female? At any rate, Sarah Palin is apparently completely unacceptable to these people based on her gender. Talk about a witch hunt! But it's not going to work. If there's nothing wrong with her background (and I haven't heard anything real so far) then it just shows how far women still have to go within our society – including within the Democratic Party. And that has turned out to be the surprise of 2008!

bruja   September 3rd, 2008 2:22 pm ET

Vegas: Sorry, I forgot: Palin is maybe just very stupid:against science, education, sex-ed (don't know about Aids), womens rights, but for moose hunting, rifles, sex (obviously), bridges to nowhere, oil, war....
Or she is simply crazy....You choose!

Americanwoman   September 3rd, 2008 2:21 pm ET

Andrea, don't speak for me! I voted for Hillary, then watched the Dems & media trash her. I won't put up with it again!!

I will vote for McCain, not because of Sarah, but I like her too. I want a proven and capable leader. Someone who has served his country proudly and bravely is a plus. Obama just isn't it.

alvino   September 3rd, 2008 2:21 pm ET

The media did not create the scandal, the moose hunter from Alaska did. To use a "Bully Pulpit" to tell media what they can cover and disclose is Un-American. Of all people, the little old war hero should know that. AMERICA FIRST!

john   September 3rd, 2008 2:21 pm ET

its so disgusting how many ignorant people are worrying about the fact that she has a baby or too many kids or what she looks like or wears or what her daughter does...WHY WHY WHY are we not concerning ourselves with SOMETHING IMPORTANT! Because the average person is an idiot, I am convinced. Do not forget that Obama has virtually no experience either, just a few years as a state senator, that is it. But because Palin is a woman, she is subjected to all this ludicrous crap.

scott   September 3rd, 2008 2:21 pm ET

I don't recall any media outlets firing attacks at Biden who is ridden with corruption. I motered the coverage by the media surrounding the DNC. The DNC was praised, heralded, and spun positivly by the media. Now, contrast that with the RNC coverage which is biased, devoid of any praise, and raising doubts in the minds about Palin. The coverage is not fair and has a definite agenda to advance the DNC. Going after Palin's family, the daughter, the husband's DUI 22 years ago, anything that might look bad, is despicable when contrasted wiht Biden's poor history. Especially going after a poor minor like this is terrible; making her the focus of politics and using this poor minor to ruin Palin.

Bobby   September 3rd, 2008 2:21 pm ET

Please!!!!! I know for one the TRUTH HURTS!!!!!! The media can lie from time to time but ANYONE can SEE whats going on with the RNC!!!! PALIN has alot of skeletons like most people do but most people did not be picked for VP. This hold charade the RNC has going in picking Palin will be brought out by my PICK for PRES. AND VICE PRES> come debate time. Let's let the RNC with their OLD SELVES continue with this CRAP!!!!!!! I am so tired of Most people in this country especially these so-called PUMA crap and OLE REBUPS

Rich   September 3rd, 2008 2:21 pm ET

Sarah Palin is being prejudged when we hardly know her. Of course, she is being attacked by the media by constantly questioning whether or not she is fit to be both a VP and a mother. This is blatant sexism. Is Barack Obama ready to be President because he is the father of two children? When will he have time for them? Give me a break. This stuff belongs in the same dump as racism. Question: will women who objected to the blatant sexist reporting on Hillary Clinton also protest the sexist attacks on Palin. Or, does principle trump partisanship?

BlueDog   September 3rd, 2008 2:21 pm ET

puhLEEEEEEAZE...what a bunch of babies the McCain/Palin team are turning out ot be. After listening to the GOP dish out endless garbage about Obama and HRC (he's a Muslim with terrorist leanings, she's a lesbian who hates America) now we're just supposed to shut up about Palin? Questioning her judgment as mayor and governor is now "nonsense" that "needs to stop"?

Hello, no. Media! Keep asking! Schmidt is a bully whp can't handle it when somebody stands up to him.

NY4O   September 3rd, 2008 2:21 pm ET

If her time as governor & mayor make her more experience than Obama, doesn't it also make her more qualified than McCain since he was never Mayor or Governor of AZ.?? When wwe consider how many aircraft he destroyed we see he was a professional at blowing it.. even at an early age..

Brian in VA   September 3rd, 2008 2:21 pm ET

Typical republican tactic...never addressing the issues that Americans really care about...they know how to campaign, they have no idea how to govern.

sam   September 3rd, 2008 2:21 pm ET

GO CAMPBELL BROWN and CNN!! The American people want to know!!!!

Dave From Philly   September 3rd, 2008 2:21 pm ET

Sen. McCain created this situation. His rush to steal the democratics thunder backfired. Do the republican expect the American public and the media just to accept his unknown choice for vice president and move on without any questions?

I never thought of Sen. McCain as being McSame, but his recent treatment of the media, is starting to remind me of President Bush.

TD   September 3rd, 2008 2:21 pm ET

Sure, complain about the media good ‘ole BushMc people! You need a scape goat. What happen to the “moral police” Mrs. Palin coming to this earth for fixing every injustice! When cat came out the bag, crying started; media unfair, its all lies, DWI doesn’t matter, woman is being attacked., etc. etc. Such Hippocrates!!!

Catherine   September 3rd, 2008 2:21 pm ET

As an unbiased Canadian observer, I'm very confused about the media's approach with Gov. Palin. Campbell Brown's interview with the McCain aide the other night was appaling! I watched with my mouth hanging open. She (Campbell) reminded me of a nasty, sarcastic middle school girl, who was coming off of her ani-psychotic medication. Grow up!

Robert   September 3rd, 2008 2:21 pm ET

The media is just doing what McReckless failed to do - thoroughly vet his running mate.

JB   September 3rd, 2008 2:21 pm ET

The media need not destroy Palins miniscule reputation.....she will do a great job of doing that on her own. Check your local television listings to find out when the Jerry Springer show aires starring the Palin family.

Jeff Taylor   September 3rd, 2008 2:21 pm ET

This is BS – The Repukelicans and McCain can stuff it – compare the current controversy to if Chelsea Clinton had wound up pregnant at 17 and the savage Republican attacks that would have ensued – she's getting off easy. I'm sick and tired of the Republican's and their "don't do as we do – do as we say" mentality and the "oh well – that's life – things happen" when it's on their side of the court. So – it's okay for a 17 year old girl to commit sin and have a child out of wedlock but not okay for a same sex couple who are as joined as the law will allow to adopt because they are living in sin – must be differnt levels of "sin" huh. Interesting. Lucky for the Republicans the 11th Commandment didn't come down – "Though shall not commit hypocrisy" – they couldn't exist.

Emma   September 3rd, 2008 2:21 pm ET

Seems it is too hot in the kitchen for the Republicans. Everyone in their sane mind except John McCain knows that Palin DOES NOT have one shred of credentials which will qualify her to step into the role of Vice President.

Forget this nonsense of attacking her as a woman. From one woman to another, PALIN DOES NOT HAVE THE EXPERIENCE TO BE VP. There, I have said it.

I don't want a former mayor negotiating peace talks. My dog can do better! At least he only barks when their is danger around, and Palin spells danger for the US. Get real America! Palin is going to ruin the opportunity for a truly qualified woman to fill the role of President and/or VP. We want a qualified woman, not a TOKEN.

Foreign observer   September 3rd, 2008 2:21 pm ET

It is astounding that McCain with his extraordinary judgement looked around and couldn´t find a VP who is more experienced and more gifted.

larry wi   September 3rd, 2008 2:20 pm ET

Funny but just about all of the alligated negative issues referencing Sarah Palin actually in reality mirror Obama, interesting! Reading the post from "seriously" indicats that even when the facts are definately in Palins favor, and are in black and white that the Obama supporters fail to recognize the differance, also interesting! Oh well most people prefer to go all out for the under dog, no matter what's at stake or the outcome....

Keith   September 3rd, 2008 2:20 pm ET

Palin is an extremist and a danger to our country. The public will be able to see through her last-second schooling!

RightWing   September 3rd, 2008 2:20 pm ET

There is no Faux report. Everything is true. They mean they want the Fox news just to do the reporting for the country.

Michael   September 3rd, 2008 2:20 pm ET

I hope O'Riley asks Obama about Rev. Wright, his stand on partial birth abortions, William Ayers, his 'not my pay grade' answer, how increasing taxes on businesses will increase workers wages and keep inflation low. And force him to admit that the surge worked and made possible for the current withdrawl plan that Bush is working out.

Not Impressed   September 3rd, 2008 2:20 pm ET

The Republicans want a free ride. In order to get us to believe their fairytale regarding Gov. Palin, they must first get the media in line. And, as usual, the media will stop asking the tough questions regarding their VP pick. If Obama would have picked a similar candidate for VP, the Republicans would be calling for his head on a stick. We cannot lose sight of the objectives of this election; to elect a president that will bring real change to this country. McCain misses being the "celebrity." He misses being the center of attention. He listend to Obama's acceptance speech and panicked. Now he has to sell his decision to his voters and the American people as a whole. Once the convention is over that is when the real fun begins.

Enlightened Voter   September 3rd, 2008 2:20 pm ET

Vegas – before you blindly attack Obama remember he was the only one that supported Palin and the privacy of her family. When you repuglicans lie, atleast glance at the facts first so you won't be caught lying in public. I know its hard to do because you hate so much but you can do it, I promise.

And Seriously!?! – thanks for the truth and the logic cause its a fact. Obama is infinitely more qualified than Palin and to my standards even mccain with his lackluster 20 some years as a repuglican puppet that has done nothing for people but fattened up those corporate pockets.

Kim   September 3rd, 2008 2:20 pm ET

To the one saying "Those who is without sin cast the first stone" bs...too bad it's Palin and her uber rightwing conservatives constantly casting stones at other people who wants the freedom to choose (MOSTLY in the cases rape, a issue Palin still doesn't care for), who wants some type of sex education in schools so their daughters won't be stupid enough to have unprotected sex and get knocked up like her own. And when some unknown teenage girl gets pregnant that same rightwing conservatives have a history of not praising or support but rather bashing and insult. It just so happens that because these stories are of Palin's daughter, it's all fine and dandy by the likes of you. Don't play double standard.

As a democrat watching all of this, these cries of sexism from Palin, the GOP and old bitter Hillary supporters still crying is pathetic. Attacks are going all around to EVERYONE. It's called Politics as dirty as it all is. Obama gets attacked, McCain gets attacked, Hillary got attacked, and if they find someone on Palin (which the media obviously did instead of McCain's campaign) she will get attacked if what they find is deemed negative.

This is to choose the leader of our country and their running mate. We need to discuss their pros AND cons. On the first days that Palin got announced her pros were announced in galore by the GOP, unfortunately for them McCain probably did not vet enough because she obviously has a lot of skeletons in her closet that slowly came into light bringing concerns to the American public hence so much discussions on so many of her bountiful issues.

Bobby   September 3rd, 2008 2:19 pm ET

Please!!!!! I know for one the TRUTH HURTS!!!!!! The media can lie from time to time but ANYONE can SEE whats going on with the RNC!!!! PALIN has alot of skeletons like most people do but most people did not be picked for VP. This hold charade the RNC has going in picking Palin will be brought out by my PICK for PRES. AND VICE PRES> come debate time. Let's let the RNC with their OLD SELVES continue with this CRAP!!!!!!!

JS   September 3rd, 2008 2:19 pm ET

Republicans, Stop Supporting Failure; Makes You All Look Foolish! Hypocracy is defined as a pretense of having a virtuous character, moral or religious beliefs or principles, that one does NOT really possess. The definition of Republicanism! The vetting process is over ..... I think not.

FemaleDemDisgustedbyMcPalin   September 3rd, 2008 2:19 pm ET

No one is attacking her! You can't just dump an unknown on the American public and not expect people to ask questions. If she can't handle this, how will she handle Putin and Karzai?

OBAMA/BIDEN 08!

Don't Forget The Wolves!   September 3rd, 2008 2:19 pm ET

Hey, Help the Polar Bear, don't forget, she was also responsible for the aerial gunning down of other species of wildlife. What a nut!

mel   September 3rd, 2008 2:19 pm ET

hey mccain, where's your sense of humor – at least these are truths –
how about lets tell lies like you do.

Phyllis   September 3rd, 2008 2:19 pm ET

I cannot believe how LOW some people in this country are stooping in order to really slam Sarah Palin. I am voting for McCain and Sarah Palin this November because they are HONEST, COURAGEOUS under fire and really care about our country. The opposite party is doing everything possible to take control of the White House and they are not reputable enough to be there. They are only for their OWN personal gain and not for the good of our country. They are liars and have been for many many elections already and yes, PEDDLING the lies in hopes that they win over TRUTH!!!
I am proud to be a REPUBLICAN and will never go for the democratic ticket ever again. THEY DO NOT DESERVE MY VOTE!!!!

Bill   September 3rd, 2008 2:19 pm ET

Obama's experience....Palin's experience...looks about the same to me. He's qualified but she's not ?? How does anyone really arrive at that conclusion. I'm having a hard time visualizing either of these two sitting across from Vladimir Putin.

indiePA   September 3rd, 2008 2:19 pm ET

Puh-le-e-e-e-e-e-ze!! What the "media" is doing to Ms. Palin is no different than what the swiftboat guys did through the media to John Kerry or the "impeachment" of Bill Clinton. Get over it1 Isn't it amazing that ,when the shoe is on the other foot, it hurts?? Both campaigns should stop the rhetoric around the candidates. I want to hear ISSUES. Let's face it, no one, and I mean NO ONE, is an angel. These are politicians. What counts is how one candidate vs. another is going to go about solving 8 years of a total mess.

Chris   September 3rd, 2008 2:19 pm ET

some of the posts are unbelievable on here. just b/c steve schimdt and some people on here say something enough times doesn't make it true. how about you stick to the issues?

Amber   September 3rd, 2008 2:18 pm ET

I agree with McCain. The media has no business digging up information on his VP pick. He wants her. The conservative base likes her. That should be the end of it.

Anonymous   September 3rd, 2008 2:18 pm ET

Where is the media investigation of Resko?

There was nothing to investigate, just tenuous links that Obama had no part in personally.

Where is the media investigation of Ayers?

Ayers was never charged for any crime, first off, and second off, people have looked into this and there is nothing further to investigate. He is from Chicago and donated to Obama's campaign, that is the long and short of it.

Where is the media investigation of Michelle's role in the non-profit?

Where is the media? America no longer has a free press. Wahhhhhhhhhhh.
Watch FOX news if you want lies spoon fed.

Larry   September 3rd, 2008 2:18 pm ET

Can ANYONE here tell me the age of the VP canidate daughter when she became pregnant???? I know she is 17 now but wondering what age was she when this happened.

Ash   September 3rd, 2008 2:18 pm ET

Media will not go after some one if teh candidate is qualified and clean. McCain camp is blaming media for their own incompetencies

Ron democrat turned independent   September 3rd, 2008 2:18 pm ET

she was born and raised in the coldest state of the union Obama was born and raised in the vacation haven of Hawaii she worked hard to get where she is Obama as cruised to his senate position hell according to Michelle he won't even plunge the toilet or take out the trash. there is a big diferrence between these two candidates my money's on her

Enough Already   September 3rd, 2008 2:18 pm ET

Come on, people!! Its enough to know that McCain vetted her. She is an exceptional governor with a record of accomplishments. You don't need to know what those accomplishments are. That's immaterial. Geez, let's have a little trust here. Yeah, just like we did with those WMD's.

The Times They Are A Changin'   September 3rd, 2008 2:18 pm ET

This is getting funnier by the minute. It was OK when the right and their toadies raised all kinds of fake issues about Barack & Michelle (remember the famous whitey tape + terrorist fist bump?) but now, they can't handle any scrutiny so they just stop talking. They'll probably limit all press access to Sarah unless she has a handler nearby.

There's so much more ugly stuff out there about the Palin clan-if it wasn't so bizarre and if our national security didn't depend on it, it has the makings of a great TV show.

Greg Rodgers   September 3rd, 2008 2:18 pm ET

Firstly,

Obama stated that going after family members should be off limits, and going after children is ridiculous. This was on all of the news outlets. I am not sure why people are saying that Obama has gone negative.

Next, Sarah Palin is an unknown. Lets face we do not know anything about her and she is now in the position of running this country? I think not.

Furthermore, the Republican party created this media nightmare on its own. Its the media's job to deliver information to us whether good or bad. If McINSANE and Palin can not handle it now then what make you think he can handle it later?

Obama has taken shots from the media scrutiny the crazy pastor and the New Yorker magazine. He didn't moan he took it, called it nonsense and moved on to become the DNC Presidential Nominee.

This BS about Palin being having more experience is SPIN and is ridiculous. RNC you can try to feed it too us but we are not going to eat it....

OBAMA/BIDEN '08

NotFallingInLine.org   September 3rd, 2008 2:18 pm ET

"Faux media scandal" is right.

The Obama-loving media that helped to sink the best candidate we had running this time is now at a total loss as to how to deal with McCain's choice of Sarah Palin.

They're reaching for any scandal. And they'd better watch out lest they've failed to learn from what happened to Dan Rather in 2004...

Female who respects people for their accomplishments not just their gender   September 3rd, 2008 2:18 pm ET

Would the country still have voted for Hillary if she had been a W clone?

Shakes Head   September 3rd, 2008 2:17 pm ET

Thank God for Comedy Central, since the Daily Show and Colbert are the only ones I have seen show the clip of Palin openly admitting that she had no idea what it was the VP actually does on a daily basis. And that was 1 MONTH ago.

But wait, she was a fierce highschool basketball player?! Oh ok, I feel better now. Thanks CNN.

AV   September 3rd, 2008 2:17 pm ET

So If you say anything about her good or bad it's sexiest?

sb   September 3rd, 2008 2:17 pm ET

It is funny John McCain selected her to create a buzz and a frenzy, but now crying because the very thing he was hoping to get-he got–lot's of buzz!! Quit whining! Tough Republicans are really just a bunch of bullies who cry when they get stood up to.

mark   September 3rd, 2008 2:17 pm ET

This is not an issue anyone should "forget about" and its shameful to cover it up since it so directly speaks to this candidate's now evident dangerous decision-making process. To me this "non-issue", means either McCain is impulsive and uncomfortably politically-expedient or he is a slave to his Rovian handlers, both of which traits were embodied by current President. I am sad the straight-talk express conversations and access to Mr. McCain (not to mention his new partner) are gone (don't exist for Palin) as they were one of the things I found enderaring and Rooseveltian (word?) about Mr. McCain. As someone who wanted to see real post-partisan unity, I lost hope in McCain's ability to deliver on that promise. I further think talking about "unity" by annointing a little known far right unknown candidate and through ultra comfrontational and party line Republican talking points is laughable, uncomfortable and almost humorous if it was not so condescending and manipulative (talk about words alone). Now strongly favoring Obama who looks more likely to make a real effort to achieve a post partisan/racial/gender environment. Seems like a pretty clear decision.

CHRIS   September 3rd, 2008 2:17 pm ET

"This vetting controversy is a faux media scandal designed to destroy the first female Republican nominee for Vice President of the United States who has never been a part of the old boys' network that has come to dominate the news establishment in this country." GO FLY A KITE STEVE BOY, SHE DESTROYED HERSELF AND THE REPUBLICAN PARTY!!!!!
OBAMA/BIDEN 08!!!!

beth   September 3rd, 2008 2:17 pm ET

oh yeah, that's the media's job silly. if you are going to be in the public spotlight then suck it up. if she would just come clean about baby trig, then everyone will go away for awhile. i just feel really bad for her family....it's obvious country first ( or maybe second) since as a former member of the AIP she wanted alaska to withdrawal from the union, SARAH second, and somewhere after that she considers her family. i'm sorry, but as a longtime republican and a Christian, i see nothing about her that displays the love of Christ or the love of a mother.

john   September 3rd, 2008 2:17 pm ET

mcold not check her but he say he can check 20 millions illegal in 24 hours (kennedy m ccain AMNESYTY)

Tony   September 3rd, 2008 2:17 pm ET

This is so funny. The Dems are showing their true colors. They doi not want a woman in charge of anything. The repubs have more females in charge than the Dems ever did. The media bias no matter the party is so one sided. There is no defense for their actions.

She is a strong candidate and NOBAMA & BIDEN do not have near the experience in running anything as she does. Biden is a suit. NOBAMA is a community organizer. NOBAMA says she only ran a city as Mayor. Of course he wants to forget she is a Gov. Help me for a minute is NOBAMA running against Palin??? Sounds like it. You know they are scared when NOBAMA has to compare his record to the VP choice. Is she perfect – no. niehter are you. Can she lead – ask Alaska.

The media does not like a woman with this type of power. Go compare the Newspaper, Editorials and Mags for yourself and then respond. You will be enlightened.

Alma Harris   September 3rd, 2008 2:17 pm ET

The media has chosen to put Bristol's pregnancy in the spotlight. I don't need to hear about this private family crisis over and over and over again. Get to the point and get off it. Do you realize what stress you are causing a first time mother in the second trimester of her pregnancy? Turn off the TV, Bristol.

I would appreciate hearing about the issues and leaving the young mother and the future father out of politics. Gov. Palin and her husband should put their family off limits to the press, much as Bill and Hillary did with Chelsea, and Prince Charles did with William and Harry.

KLangg   September 3rd, 2008 2:17 pm ET

As a woman Republican, I am amazed to see my Republican congressman and all of these speakers at the convention talk about her "proven track record as a leader". I am losing respect not only for McCain, but for the whole Republican party. Please do not insult my intelligence. She is in no way qualified to be VP of our country. It is not sexist to say that, it is common sense. My congressman is not helping get McCain's vote, he is losing my vote for his re-election because I now question his judgement too!

larry buchas   September 3rd, 2008 2:17 pm ET

We haven't even seen the beginning. She is a radical right-wing idealogue.

Never mind her lies about the bridge to nowhere, her PAC command role for an indicted Senator, anti-Jewish preacher, $27 million in pork received, banning books in her town library, $95,000 charge to the state of Alaska for her troopergate scandal.

Lynn   September 3rd, 2008 2:17 pm ET

I get cold chills thinking about Sarah Palin stepping into the presidency. How can anyone feel comfortable knowing someone so inexperienced could be at the helm in times like these? The width and breadth of America is NOT Alaska!!!

Darlee   September 3rd, 2008 2:17 pm ET

SO, this morning, I hear this woman from the RNC say that the pregnancy issue just makes Palin more real. that it makes her seem like she lives next door and has the problems everyone has.
Her statement was that teenage pregnancy is just like one of those things that just happen.

Wow, I agree with a conservative republican! I was dizzy at the thought. This is what liberals have been saying for YEARS!
So guess what? The abstinence only BS is just that. Teach them sex ed

Captain Cannabis   September 3rd, 2008 2:17 pm ET

The very idea of Governor Palin being more qualified than Senator Obama is laughable. If the American people couldn't see through John McCain before I believe they'll find him a little more transparent now. Oh, and we went from having only talked to her once before making the decision to a six month long vetting process....that didn't include her. What a joke. John McJoke

Joyce   September 3rd, 2008 2:17 pm ET

The negative media coverage on Sarah Palin is disgustingly obvious. She is more qualified than Sen. Obama to run for VP (and he's running for President). She has more executive experience as a governor for 2 years with more accomplished during those 2 years than others have made during 2 terms. I do not know enough about her at this point and I am not learning more about her from the media.
From her bare outline, she seems to be a very impressive woman.
The media is spewing tabloid trash and it is over the line. . She deserves fair coverage instead of the "National Enquirer" treatment...and her teenage daughter and infant baby should be left out of it.

OBAMA&BIDEN 2008   September 3rd, 2008 2:16 pm ET

GUESS WHAT? WHO IS SARA PALIN? A STRANGER REDNECK IT SEEMS. BUSH in DRAG.

Nia Hussein- Phoenix, AZ   September 3rd, 2008 2:16 pm ET

Here we go...unless the news is good don't report on it the same thing they are doing for McKeatingFive. If it's bad and cover it up or barry it. I can seeif reporters were asking petty questions but the questions have bee focused on her foreign policy experience, economic experience etc... pundit and surrogates can't answer the questin or stick to a vague script. And then they claim sexism or soem conspiracy theory that the media is trying to destroy her...no people really want to know about Palin. the sad part is the media will bend for McCain and contunie with the glowing media attention and burrying of info that they give him

think.   September 3rd, 2008 2:16 pm ET

Or how about this take: "YOU MAKE YOURSELVES LOOK BAD."

bruja   September 3rd, 2008 2:16 pm ET

Vegas: When did Obama slander any women? Pay attention! Dont talk, think. Can you?

jim, kansas city   September 3rd, 2008 2:16 pm ET

"the smart" voter, could you not ask the same question about Obama, doesn't he have two daughters, who is going to watch them if he gets elected. Or wait a minute, females should stay home cook, clean, and watch the kids. I am appalled by Obama supporters, I mean this is big time sexism. Its digusting.
I agree media should be free and they should be allowed to report on anything, but they should do it with dignity and fairness. How come CNN does not search into Obama's past and his not so clean relationships from the past. I think there should be some fairness, most of you Obamabots criticize Fox, but if it werenot for Fox we would never know about Wright, I know that for a fact. I highly doublt it "academicly looking" Blitzer would look into that, or "green planet" Cooper.
Looking Cambell Obrien on the day Palin was anounced as VP pick, you would have to be litteraly a moneky not to see a bias in the media.
Advice for Cambell keep a Midol handy and chill out, you have kids as well, I see you more on TV than Palin, somebody must be watching your kids as well.
Now I know how Hillary supporters felt, this kind of sexism in USA its unbeliveable and shocking.
Who knows what people from overseas read the treatment that media are giving to VP pick for GOP.

tomiwa   September 3rd, 2008 2:16 pm ET

Obama:
B.A in political science from Columbia University, with a specialization in international relations
J.D. in Law from Hardvard, graduated magna cum laude; President of the Harvard Law Review
12 years (92-04) teaching constitutional law
7 years State Senator: sponsored more than 800 bills
4 years Senator for Illinos, a state with 12.8 million people

Palin:
Bachelor's in journalism from University of Idaho
4 years Wasilla City Council (8000 people)
6 years Wasilla mayor (8000 people)
1 year "Ethics Commissioner of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission"
20 months governor of a state with 660,000 people

Executive experience is never the sole requirement for presidency, if so Neither Obama nor Mccain will be on their ticket. You just look at the resumes above (I hope somebody can post mccains educational record). No wonder Obama's jugement is so sound and is organzational skills is reflected in the way re runs his campaign. its like high school, Obama is the smart "weak Guy" while Mccain and the GOPs are the Dull Bullies.

Mccain does not possess any international relations skill (he does not even understand diplomacy). He sticks to what he knows "WAR".....and some Americans are buying that.

Female who respects people for their accomplishments not just their gender   September 3rd, 2008 2:16 pm ET

What would Hillary say to all of her former supporters who are now on the McCain bandwagon just because he put a woman on the ticket? Do you think she is proud of the fact that so many of her "supporters" only supported her because she was a woman, and not because of what she has accomplished and what she believed in? Maybe she will vote for McCain/Palin just to advance women towards the White House, but I doubt it.

Liviu   September 3rd, 2008 2:16 pm ET

I would like CNN to cover Todd Palin's afiliation with AIP.
Also her speaches at the AIP conventions.

LATINA FEMALE   September 3rd, 2008 2:16 pm ET

PALIN IS A THROW BACK TO THE 1700S.

McIdiot McCain   September 3rd, 2008 2:16 pm ET

The stage will get crowded with all of John's women. Let's see there's Carol, the first wife he cheated on when he had an affair with Cindy Lou. Okay, Cindy Lou–the bimbo beer princess, and now Sarah, the hockey mom-grandma-heart beat-away-beauty-queen. Wow, John, I can't keep up.

Lumberjack   September 3rd, 2008 2:16 pm ET

When a McCain Spokemans (Tucker Bounds) can't answer a simple question or provide ONE instance of her making an executive decision while Governor of Alaska you can't sit here and tell me she's at all qualified for the position. That dog doesn't hunt Tucker. My hat's off to Campbell for asking the tough questions and demanding an answer. Ther American people have a right to the Truth!

Mark - California   September 3rd, 2008 2:16 pm ET

Yes having a family maybe a full time job but it's nothing compared to being VP of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, if thats the case then you stay at home moms are underpaid and you now have the qualifications to be VP. Lets look at her experience and she is lacking not becuase she's a woman if she was a man I would be saying the same thing.

bernadette   September 3rd, 2008 2:16 pm ET

what nonsense! Every candidate for national office should expect to come under public scrutiny – its part of the process – and if the McCain people didn't understand it or don't like it, too bad. They need to grow up and take their punishment for acting on impulse instead of deliberate judgment. We all know McCain picked Palin because he could not get Lieberman and wanted to shake things up to get some momentum for his campaign. It was never about what is best for America – it has always been McCain doing and saying whatever he thinks will get him elected. Now that he has made his choice, they should live with it and the consequences of her real stance on issues and real past (anti-maverick) coming out into the open.

Newly Independent   September 3rd, 2008 2:16 pm ET

I think Obama just likes to target women b/c he thinks they are weak candidates.

Case in point, the woman he ran out of the IL race due to technicalities...

Case in point, the treatment of HRC.

Case in point, the treatment of Sarah Palin.

Obama never comes out and attacks the women himself, he just has his surrogates and pundits do it for him.

Blacks want equal rights, and so does everyone else.........

michael minorgan   September 3rd, 2008 2:16 pm ET

how can you COMPLETELY AND THOROUGHLY vet someone then have the man running for prseident only meet her ONE TIME!!!!!!!!! Give me a break. If this is what his decision making process is then Americans should really be scared if they win!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Woman from WV   September 3rd, 2008 2:16 pm ET

OK Tbone says "If they are all upset, just show us how she is qualified. Until I see it, no one is buying it. What did she do as leader of the Alaska National Guard. The question has been asked but not been answered. Why?"

GIVE THEM A FREAKING CHANCE. These idiots have been out for blood ever since they announced her name for God sakes. Tonight is the first time she has a chance to speak to America since the announcement. SO SHUT UP AND LISTEN TONIGHT before you all go condeming her.

To me, she seems quite intelligent and a "Ray of HOPE" for this country. The men in power have used the last 200+ years to screw things up so bad – its probably going to take a few good women a little while to fix it! Give the poor woman a chance to speak on the issues and leave the personal lives of this family (and everyone) where it belongs.....not in the public view. How would you like for the whole country to be digging into every little thing that has ever happened to you or within your family? Things that you prefer to keep private among family. I don't really care if the president or any politician smoked pot years ago, got a dui years ago or has a freaking affair. That does not mean that they can't do a good job at running the country. I don't agree with some of those things, but having an affair, or having a pregnant teenager sure don't have much to do with how they do their jobs.

I was a HUGE Hillary fan, but the media lost her that race also. So let the people make up their own minds and stop nit picking at every little aspect of her life. Let her prove that she can get the job done. I for one, have a lot of respect for her from what I've heard so far. SO LET HER SPEAK BEFORE YOU JUDGE!!!!

I'M A HE** OF A LOT LESS SCARED OF WHAT SHE CAN DO THAN I AM OF WHAT OBOOMA WILL DO TO THIS COUNTRY! BE AFRAID, BE VERY AFRAID if Obama gets in office....think I'll have to find a new, safer country to move to....how's the whether in Austrailia?

GO PALIN....Go show these idiots what a woman can really do!!!!

By the way....how can Obama be a good father and be president at the same time? SEXISM all around us but everyone is scared to death to say anything against Obama because of his race (by the way what is his race? Kenyan/American?) Yea Right!

pj4521   September 3rd, 2008 2:16 pm ET

LOVING IT!! Obama hits a grand slam and mcbush can't find his way out of the dug out. What a pathetic display from the grand OLD party.

Ken in NM   September 3rd, 2008 2:16 pm ET

Oh okay just because now they are saying she was vetted for 6 months that must mean it's true. Just like WMDs.

Specialist G   September 3rd, 2008 2:16 pm ET

If she can't make "abstinence only" work in her own family, how is she going to make it work for the country? More hypocrisy and moral bankruptcy from the Taliban wing of the GOP. That "Adam and Eve Rode Dinosaurs To Church" stuff may play well with the tent show preachers, but real America is turned off by it. We've had an oil company shill as VP for the last eight years. We can't afford another one. Send Grampy McSame and Caribou Barbie packing in November.

Obama-Biden 08

dick bohanon   September 3rd, 2008 2:16 pm ET

wow the republicans are whining again
never mind that the tactics they complain about are straight from their playbook.
never mind that the playbook is straight from 1938 germany
(read "human smoke")
substitute "democrat" or "liberal" for "jew"
and you have Goebbels exact strategy for
winning the mind(less) war
i belong to no party
but ridiculous behavior from the RICO statute political party must be commented on.
dont you get it?
the republican party can not be trusted
how many lies does it take to convince you?
when you care enough about this country (and not just yourself)
whats good for america will hopefully prevail.
but dont let facts get in the way of your "truth".
the powers that be didnt in 1938 germany

lou   September 3rd, 2008 2:15 pm ET

Too Bad...You should have vetted her better. too bad we arent buying your fear and hate Johnnie.... You and your cheerleader are a bad joke...America is moving on.....

Richard Marko   September 3rd, 2008 2:15 pm ET

What I do not understand is WHY the media continues to allow the McCain camp to define this topic. What did the McCain camp expect when you select a person that could possibly become the President someday, talk less of an unknown? The facts are simple, McCain picked Sarah Palin because she was a woman, and because she was attractive. The first reason was to lure Hillary supporters, and the latter was to counter Obama's good looks that some women seem to like. Pure and simple. It had nothing to do with experience for goodness sake. Have you ever heard of Olympia Snow, Elizabeth Dole, Gov. Whitman, or even Carly Fiona?

Could the media community please do their job and continue to report on Gov. Palin?? Gov. Palin's daughter is fair game because the EXTREME right presented her as holier than thou; her stance on sex ed; and the vetting (or lack thereof) process and judgement of John McCain.

Sunny, Southampton, NY   September 3rd, 2008 2:15 pm ET

I am Republican who votes in every election, but I will not vote for Gov. Palin.

I don't know what is worse, the fact that she's a fundamentalist who believes that creationism and abstinence should be taught in schools, or that she has no national experience, no idea what a Vice President's job entails and until lately had no idea what the issues are – though her speechwriters tonight will try to make it appear otherwise. She also says she doesn't believe in global warming and hasn't personally seen any signs of it. Apparently, she hasn't noticed the dramatic changes that have been affecting her state, its coasts and the endangered polar bear population.

I can shoot too, that's not so unusual. I am not impressed. My daughter is not pregnant because I taught her well and watch her closely (It's called family values), and if she were, I would want her to have the right to choose – a right which Sarah Palin does not support and would work to take away. I believe strongly in the separation of church and state. I do not believe Sarah Palin does and that troubles me – a lot.

Choosing her to secure the evangelical vote was a terrible idea for this country. Shame on those who did it. Gov. Palin should be focusing on her own messy family's immediate needs and that of her state instead of running for higher office. This country need leaders ready to hit the ground running right after the election, not one who needs to hit the books to learn what she does not know.

CNN loves McCain   September 3rd, 2008 2:15 pm ET

Anyone who actually believes Palin is more experienced than Obama was STUPID enough to vote for Bush twice!!

Really, maybe we should have IQ testing as a prerequisite to voting again!

John, North Carolina   September 3rd, 2008 2:15 pm ET

A few years back the Republican party successfully quashed the media for reporting anything that was against the party. They did this by holding a carrot and a stick over them. If your news organization wants to be embedded during the Gulf conflicts, then you better report what we tell you to report was their mantra. Today, after so many negative stories of corruption and moral turpitudes committed by the party, they have less power and this is a blessing. I hope this time the media doesn't bow to them and continues to report the facts as they appear.

Ruwena LRA   September 3rd, 2008 2:15 pm ET

Sara Palin's baby will need undivided attention from her. It is not the baby's fault that she has dissabilities. Mothers love is very important. Is she going to leave the baby with nurses. Put politics away now. Please, sarah be sysmpathetic.

jim   September 3rd, 2008 2:15 pm ET

CNN, please remind people that Obama VERY STRONGLY urged people not to drag Palin's daughter into this. He pointedly said that he was the son of a teenage mother. Please remind people of this. Please don't try to make it sound like Obama is attacking Palin for her personal issues. Palin is being attacked for her hypocrisy in office: after coming out swinging last friday and saying (noone asked her, she volunteered this in a speech) that she was against the Bridge to Nowhere, and earmarks, and had fought corruption, it turns out that: She was for the bridge to nowhere before she was against it, she hired lobbyists and brought in 20million in earmarks to Wasilla, and she has her own cronyism scandal going. For just under 2 years in office, that's a lot.

Bill   September 3rd, 2008 2:15 pm ET

If Sara was a man, he would have been laughed off the ticket in five minutes... or probably never even considered.

The real story here is that its less than 70 days to the election, and McCain is trying to firm up his _base_ !!!

Joan L.   September 3rd, 2008 2:15 pm ET

The only reason that McCain didn't pick one of the truly "viable" female candidates is because each and every one of them is more intelligent and experienced than he is.

Joan L

Bigdog in Texas   September 3rd, 2008 2:15 pm ET

*Why did KB Hutchinson not want to run with him?
*He wanted a woman and she has the skills and skins and the ability. He scrambled because they would not accept Joe (no allegiance) Lieberman as his partner in crime. The Media new these answers and did not rush these stories.

Calling a woman on her scandals, reporting her record or is not sexist, it is journalism. All is fair, barring the children. But how do you run a senate of adults when you cant run your town or house with out discord. What is fake is the GOP attempt at throwing her at the country and thinkg nothing will be said. Dont Drink the Koo-Aid,,,,,,

Jason, Los Angeles   September 3rd, 2008 2:14 pm ET

Has anyone actually detailed her "extensive" accomplishments while governing the 3rd least populous state in the union? I don't understand what she's done? And anyway, by the flawed Republican logic, Palin is far more accomplished than McCain even. What a joke. Remember when Palin asked her interviewer, on CNBC, what a VP's job is? Remember when Karl Rove slammed Kaine for his lack of experience as the governed or Virginia (the 12th most populous state)?

The Republican party is more desperate than ever...and they gave us George Bush!

Marina   September 3rd, 2008 2:14 pm ET

McCain always loses his cool when faced with questions he doesn't want to answer. If he's not ready for scrutiny, he shouldn't be running for president. The selection of a running mate is a telling decision, and rightfully so.

Mireille   September 3rd, 2008 2:14 pm ET

McCain "picked his governing partner after a long and thorough search"–yeah, a long and thorough search of the other candidates on the short list, maybe. The eventual choice, I don't think so. Kudos to the reporters for doing the vetting that McCain and camp obviously didn't do here. And, as for your perceived "faux media scandal.." get a grip. Your obvious attempts to "work the refs" is pathetic and won't fly this go round.

Brent   September 3rd, 2008 2:14 pm ET

Is McCain suggesting that he didn't think the media would look into the person he picked as VP??? Come on now, every candidate gets scrutinized by the media, and most of them don't whine about it.

Besides, if McCain didn't realize that by picking a VP with no experience the media might ask a few uncomfortable questions aqbout her, then McCain is crazy. He picked her, he's going to have to live with his pick being scrutinized. That's just the way it goes.

Jay   September 3rd, 2008 2:14 pm ET

As soon as I need a moose field dressed here in Florida I'll consider Palin.

Tim   September 3rd, 2008 2:14 pm ET

Just because you say you won't talk about it anymore will not make it go away. You blew your VP choice, now admit it!!! When Graham stated we were a nation of whinners, he was talking about McCain and his Campaign!!! CNN if you let McCain get away with pouting and cancelling his interview, just becasue The great Tucker got served, you can turn in your news credentials.

Rick   September 3rd, 2008 2:14 pm ET

The media is simply asking questions the public wants to know. That's their job and they are doing it well.

Obama was scrutinized just as harshly by the same members of the press. i remember watching an Obama aide sweating bullets as an anchor drilled him with the EXACT same questions.

Does the American public deserve to know what accomplishments Governor Palin has involving the Alaska National Gaurd. Yes. And when the answer comes back as,.. "Well, more accomplishments than Obama has!" – So much for straight talk. I'm sorry, that answer is doing our country a great disservice.

Country First – Answer the questions our media gives you.

Tess   September 3rd, 2008 2:14 pm ET

No one has yet begun to vet Obama.

John   September 3rd, 2008 2:14 pm ET

yea the libral media just act like 12 yr olds. besides if bill clinton never cut our defense budgets/intel maybe 9/11 would have never happened.

Janine   September 3rd, 2008 2:14 pm ET

I'm glad to see that Palin's daughter has the support from her family on her upcoming pregnancy. But that doesn't change my mind on my pro-choice views. Unfortunately, many families do not have access to the resources Governor Palin has so she just doesn't represent the majority of voters. I personally would never have an abortion but I believe that until you've walked a mile in someone else's shoes, you cannot judge them. I graduated from a very very conservative University in Texas and I know several girls that got abortions. With abortion illegal, abortions will still continue. They will either go to another country, get it done here illegally where it is unregulated and unsafe, try to do it themselves, or we will find more babies in the dumpsters.

DUTCH from VA   September 3rd, 2008 2:14 pm ET

Republicans=ELITISTS

Did anyone notice the sea of white people in that hall last night. Finding a brother in there would be like finding Waldo.

OBAMA/BIDEN 08

Mark - California   September 3rd, 2008 2:14 pm ET

Stop trying to blame Obama for the medias vetting of Palin, someone has too. Plus Obama and his campaign have already said her kids are off limits! So before yuou make your comments about him read up first on the statements his camp put out.

PLUS THERE ARE PLENTY OF WOMEN WHO HAVE FAMILIES AND 3, 4 OR 5 KIDS WORKING BUT THAT DOESN'T QUALIFY THEM TO BE VP OF THE FREE WORLD!!

A NATION OF WINERS   September 3rd, 2008 2:14 pm ET

ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF MCSAME'S

LACK OF ANY INTELLECTUAL ACTIVITY.

Jane   September 3rd, 2008 2:14 pm ET

This is indicative of the bash and slash, fear and smear, control-freak mentality that the Republican Party has come to reflect!

They are out of control!

They are now attacking the NEWS MEDIA for crying out loud!

There is NO question in my mind that the Republicans want to control the Free Press as well as the country.

They scare me.....alot!!!

Tom In CA   September 3rd, 2008 2:14 pm ET

From what's circulating on the blogs – the media needs to do some more vetting Scott. Unless, you want to say that the growing Palin scandal compendium is true:

1. Lack of experience hypocrisy. McCain spent the entire summer attacking Obama over his lack of experience, and then picked a far less experienced politician for his running mate. McCain's 2008 presidential campaign actually started before Palin took office.

2. A reformer under investigation. Palin is being sold as a reformer, even though she is currently facing an ethics probe (from other Republicans), and recently hired a lawyer to help her with that investigation. She is probably guilty too, considering that she did the exact same thing when she was a mayor. However, it wasn't illegal when she fired people for political purposes as a mayor. While occupying the governor's mansion, I believe it is.

3. Family values: Her 17-year old daughter is pregnant. Not only did Palin thus expose her daughter to endless humiliation in front of the entire world by accepting the slot, but it isn't even clear if Palin told the McCain campaign about the situation before she accepted the slot. Oh, and Palin opposes birth control, even for married couples.

4. Extreme right-winger: Even though she is being sold to moderates, it turns out she is an extremely hard-core wingnut, supporting Pat Buchannan and a whole host of other disturbing things.

5. Deep ties to Alaska pork: Palin claims she opposed "the bridge to nowhere," but she was actually in favor of it for a while. She also loves earmarks and Ted Stevens.

6. Secessionist? Oh yeah, and she also might be a secessionist or at least her husband.

7. Lack of prior relationship with McCain: As it turns out, she only met, and talked with, McCain once before being selected. No wonder Republican lawyers are still vetting her. This is some excellent preparation by the McCain campaign for McCain's first presidential decision.

Barbara (former Republican)   September 3rd, 2008 2:13 pm ET

Republicans have confirmed what we all know - "spin" is a four-letter word. Do they really think we believe Senior McCain Strategists when they count PTA work into Palin's resume' as years of public service? (Tucker Bounds, McCain Strategist)

Or, Cindy McCain and McCain staffers who equate 20 months as governor of a state that "borders" on Russia to "foreign relations" and "foreign policy" experience. Really??!!

These people need to take off both their "Republican hats" AND "American hats" and put on their "thinking caps." They might be able to sell this stuff to the remaining Republicans - but, Independents & Democrats are smarter than that. We are well able to recognize BS when we step in it - or, see it spin by.

Kevin Kris   September 3rd, 2008 2:13 pm ET

Voted for Hillary, Smalltown, NC – Is a pathetic republican..
Hillary and Sarah are exact opposites.. I am not sure any hillary supporters will vote john Mccain because Sarah is VP. No way near to it.

If John McCain becomes president, only god can save america.

Mark G. St. Paul, MN   September 3rd, 2008 2:13 pm ET

We've been too hard on Sarah Palin, after all she is just as cute as a button. Who cares if she her executive experience included a world of 7500 people, she's spunky! Never mind that she's been out of the country precisely once in her life (unless you count driving across the Alcan Highway a couple of times as international travel). Why I'm sure that world leaders will be so busy checking out her caboose (which John McCain is apparently quite taken with) that they'll just forget about war and do whatever they can to please her – she does, after all, have such a sparklingly perky personality. That's right, we need a breath of fresh air. I'm sure she'll do great things with the interior decorating of the Oval Office. If Clinton was our everyman they've answered back with probably the most demeaning version of everywoman they can find. God I love politics!

Rick   September 3rd, 2008 2:13 pm ET

According to the Rasmussen poll, roughly 50% of the voters think the media has a pro-Obama bias. I've seen nothing in the reporting of this story and the Republican convention in general to counter that belief

Enough People!   September 3rd, 2008 2:12 pm ET

This has NOTHING to do with Hillary. This has NOTHING to do with sexism. This has NOTHING to do with child rearing.
Do you think the Good Ole Boys asked Bobby Kennedy how he was going to "raise" John Joe & Caroline in the White House! No I don't think so. Keep the issue of family out of this. This is about strength in leadership, nothing more

Realistic   September 3rd, 2008 2:12 pm ET

Translation: The American public has no business finding out what their possible future Vice President is like. Plus, it not our fault for not properly vetting Palin, it's the media's fault in letting the facts get out.

Doesn't that just have the ring of the Bush Administration's press conferences: Don't you dare question our mistakes!

John McCain, More of the Same

No Mcsame or Not Hillary in 08   September 3rd, 2008 2:12 pm ET

Well lets see facts about Gov Palin

-4 month old with down syndrome
-Govenor onl 20 months
-Mayor of Wasillia 6175 for 2 terms
-Under Investigation for abuse of Power
-Pro Life
-1 month ago did not know what a VP did day to day
-"...concerned about advancing Alaska's issues..."
-For drilling in ANWR
-17 year old 5 month pregnant daughter
-17 year old pregnant daughter Bristol allegedly seen in pictures underage drinking
-17 year old pregnant daughter Bristol allegedly seen in pictures kissing other girls
-Palin did corparate funding for now defamed Alaska Sen Ted Stevens
-Had state commisioner fired(fact) for refusing to dismiss her brother in law(allegedly)
-Palin in 2006 veteod a bill that would have banned Alaska from providing benefits to same sex partners of state employees
-Palins husband is a registered member of the Alaska Independence party(a party that voted in the past to sucede from the US)
-Palin fired the Wasillia police cheif and librarian because they did not support her administration.(1996 the cheif sued and lost the judge said it was legal to fire a city employee for political reasons she was city counsel at this point)
-Palin hired lobbying firm Robertson, Monagle & Eastbaugh to lobby for federal money for Wasillia and they successfully received 27 million in earmarked funds.(15 million $$$ for a rail project going from Wasillia to Girkwood a.k.a. Sen Ted Stevens hometown.
-In 2002 when term limits prevented Palin from running for mayor again the race was Palins stepmother versus Palins cousin. Palin endorsed her cousin and her stepmother lost.
-From 2003-2005 Palin served as a director of Sen Ted Stevens "Excellence in Public Service Inc" a 527 group that served as a republican political boot camp
-Palin objected to listing polar bears as an endangered species because she was worried it would hurt oil and gas developement called it "inappropriate"
-In 2007 the Alaska Creamery Board recommended closing Mantunuska maid dairy an unprofitable state business Palin objected citing concern for dairy farmers and a recent $600,000 infusion of state money, she fired the entire membership of the board of agriculture and conservation. The new board reversed the decision to close the dairy and the dairy was later put up for sale minimum bid $3.35 million no offers the dairy closed sold august of the next year for $1.5 million
-In 2006 received earmark money($223 million) for the "bridge to nowhere" kept the money but scrapped the project(which made her a reformer)
-Plays no role in national defense activities related to the national guard as Commander in Cheif of the Alaska NAtional Guard
-Palin eloped at eh age of 24

lilly   September 3rd, 2008 2:12 pm ET

Sexism obviously continues to be the strategy of the Obama campaign. The new tactic is to use women to make the sexist comments this time around. Since the big backlash when men did it to Hillary, they think having women do it to Hillary will be okay. Well, news to them, I find this even more offensive.

Sally Quinn, Soledad O’Brien and Campbell Brown are some of the female TV personalities sent out by Obama to ruthlessly attack Palin. I can’t believe it is 2008 when I hear comments that she is a bad mother or incapable of doing the job because she has children. These women have children themselves so maybe they should be fired for it. What about Pelosi who has 5 kids too – I never heard them trying to force her out of office because of it.

Don’t be fooled into believing Obama’s hands are clean and that he is not involved in these attacks. Remember nothing is beyond acceptability in the corrupt chicago political machine that is supporting him.

Robert   September 3rd, 2008 2:12 pm ET

Sad, very sad … and Republicans have been doing this same sort of thing for years. Very sad.

Sharon Conner   September 3rd, 2008 2:12 pm ET

It is a sad world indeed, when the Republicans scare off the media. What is there to hide? This should make any self-respecting journalist dig a little deeper into Ms. Palin's background.

Everyone should stay on alert when the Republican's start with the scare tactics. It is the only way that they know how to win an election.

Tina   September 3rd, 2008 2:12 pm ET

Would someone in the media please report on the following –
She has a pastor who dams Jews and says "god will punish the US of A"

She is under state investigation.

She worked for the criminal Alascan politicians in a 527.

She has ties to the Alaska Independence Party.

Her husband has ties to Big Oil.

She accused Hillary of Whinning – now look who is Whinning!!

longhairs for obama   September 3rd, 2008 2:12 pm ET

obama is ahead in iowa.

Jan Houston   September 3rd, 2008 2:12 pm ET

Why is Sarah and Todd Palin linked to the Alaskan Independent Party?

Why does the AIP website have links to other parties in the South that revere the Confederate Flag?

The Palins are Alaskans First.

It is criminal for John Mccain to put our country in this kind of danger by putting Palin forward.

FORMER REPUBLICAN   September 3rd, 2008 2:12 pm ET

PALIN COMPLETES JOHN MCSAME'S TOTAL

TRANSITION TO THE RIGHT WING, & HIS

ALWAYS MONEY COMES FIRST CHARACTER.

HE IS FORMALLY BOUGHT AND PAID FORE.

AVR   September 3rd, 2008 2:12 pm ET

The media is neither RED nor BLUE, they are green as in $$$$. The media will always be attracted to what will attract the most ratings. It was the McCain campaign that made the decision to supprise the Media and draw attention away from Obama.

Well they succeeded.

The problem was that they were not thoughtful in their planning, and were SOOO aggressive in how they pushed her on the public and how they tried to spin the story.

With all the experience they claim to have, they should have known that the media would want to find out more about her. Unfortunately, the spin is falling apart.

Why didn't they mention that Palin was an expectant grandmother last friday when they introduced her. They could have just mentioned that Briston and her "fiance" were expecting their first baby. That would have killed the Springer story before it gained traction.

Instead of blaming the media, the campaign should have enough backbone to accept responsibility for a bad presentation.

Matt, Delaware   September 3rd, 2008 2:12 pm ET

A Mayor and Governor must take a stance on everything that comes before them. Senators have the luxury of being able to vote "Present" or just vote with their party.
Since we need so much experience to run for political office, does this mean that politics is closed to the average American?
One of the premises on which this country was built was that "anyone" could run for political office. The call for "experience" is a trademark of those already in the club. The old major networks have nothing to offer as far as unbiased news. Average Americans will rise up and join together and say enough is enough.

Colleen   September 3rd, 2008 2:12 pm ET

I just can't wait to vet your Sarah...
...her family values allow her ti use her children as pawns...to get to the whitehouse...sure..her family comes first..doesn't it? a good reason to have that poor baby..and then drag him around to prove you are a good mother and a good pro-life candidate...shame on you Sarah...

Steve - southern Illinois   September 3rd, 2008 2:11 pm ET

The Republican Party – If you're a P.O.W. (plain old war heros like John Kerry need not apply,) a rich white person, or someone who thinks Christianity means you should tell everyone else how to act, you'll fit right in.

ALL HAIL GEORGE BUSH!!

Jim from CA   September 3rd, 2008 2:11 pm ET

This is as frustrating to me as it is obvious to see: The McCain campaign chose Palin fully knowing what would ensue, with the pre-meditated intent to spin inquiry into sexism. Palin's selection was made solely to target disenfranchised Hillary supporters. Anything that can be construed, even by the most disingenuous of pundits, as sexism will be jumped on. This ploy stands out as the most chauvinistic, sexist, and morally bankrupt in our nation's history. SHAME on you john. reporters insisting their question be answered rather than responded to with a talking point are not sexist.

jeremy - tx   September 3rd, 2008 2:11 pm ET

Some of you really need to knock it off with the whole "Oh my God... how can Obama attack a mother like that?" crap. Give it a rest. Sexism and racism exist solely because of people like you. You don't like it when people sniff you out for what you are, so you fabricate yourself into a victim. Considering everything Americans have been through these last 8 years, we've gotten pretty good at filtering out your b.s., so don't insult us by acting like your inner child has been permanently wounded or something.

Phil Newton from Murphy, Oregon   September 3rd, 2008 2:11 pm ET

G.O.P. selective outrage is amusing, given the sorts of outright lies they have spread about their opponents.

In that warped worldview, trying to discover the truth becomes an objectionable act.

Unbelievable.

mike   September 3rd, 2008 2:11 pm ET

Good for you John McCain. It is none of the media's business about your vetting process. The Governor looks good to us.

We Demand Our Country Back!   September 3rd, 2008 2:11 pm ET

Why is that any question of Palin’s experience is the “all boys club” ganging up her? Why is it suddenly sexist for anyone to challenge her limited credentials?
That argument didn’t work for Hillary and it certainly won’t work for Palin.
I keep hearing about this energized base of Repubs…why are they energizing the folks that were already going to vote for the Repub nominee? I thought the focus was on moderates and independents. Palin has no appeal for them because she is such an extreme conservative. McCain may have put the nail in his coffin with this one.

JOBAMA '08!

Joey   September 3rd, 2008 2:11 pm ET

If Palin is destroyed, she will have done it to herself. It is not uncommon for young people to live in ways of which they later become ashamed. We have not heard whether Palin was pregnant before she was married. After all, she eloped with her husband. Now why would that matter? It matters because government officials like Palin want to stand and lecture America about how other's morals ought to be. The so called religious right has done this for years. Family values, what a joke. Think about it. While the Governor Palin was in the hosptial giving birth, her daughter was somewhere getting pregnant. Some family values. And then Palin has the gall to lecture us. I think she and McCain should just disappear together. Maybe that's already happened.

Kate   September 3rd, 2008 2:10 pm ET

As a woman nearing 40, I would love to see a woman in the white house, However, I don't think this is the RIGHT woman for the position. Her lack of national exposure, her lack of international experience, worries me greatly. I think the republican party should have expected this type of "research" into a relative unknown. To expect us to blindly accept a VP nomination and not check into her past political doings is beyond reprehensible. We are not blind, nor are we stupid. We just want to know who or what we will be dealing with. At least with Obama, I can reasonably know what to expect. Same with Biden. I can look up McCain records and figure out where he stands on many issues. However, to basically be told that this is his nomination, and to accept it is not going to fly with this lady! I also think to call us sexist because we aren't blindly following a man's decision rather like calling the kettle black. Who is really the sexist here?

Bobbie Talley   September 3rd, 2008 2:10 pm ET

PLEASE....can you just let us see and HEAR the speeches. We already know what the talking heads are all about,. They would prefer us to hear THEIR opinions.... just back off and allow the Republicans their time, as you did the Dems.

Kate in NC   September 3rd, 2008 2:10 pm ET

I am sorry. I didn't know we aren't allowed to ask questions. Gracious, if all the information the McCain camp was putting out weren't so false. She is not a reformer – she gathered as much pork barrel spending as she could using a lobbyist. She was for the bridge to nowhere; she worked for Stevens 527, and had asked for another 200 million in pork barrel funding from Stevens before he was indicted. She has been governor of a state, that doesn't have a capitol building and whose legislature meets for only 90 days A YEAR! So tell me why we shouldn't wonder about the experience of this woman. As citizens, our vetting process is the CAMPAIGN TRAIL NOT THE VOTING BOOTH – that means asking questions!

Seriously!?!   September 3rd, 2008 2:10 pm ET

Just wanted to make sure everybody had a chance to look at the facts . .

Obama:
B.A in political science from Columbia University, with a specialization in international relations
J.D. in Law from Hardvard, graduated magna cum laude; President of the Harvard Law Review
12 years (92-04) teaching constitutional law
7 years State Senator: sponsored more than 800 bills
4 years Senator for Illinos, a state with 12.8 million people

Palin:
Bachelor's in journalism from University of Idaho
4 years Wasilla City Council (8000 people)
6 years Wasilla mayor (8000 people)
1 year "Ethics Commissioner of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission"
20 months governor of a state with 660,000 people

*Oh you forgot about her commercial fishing experience that should really give her a bit of an advantage on foreign policy. Ha!

independent thinker in Michigan   September 3rd, 2008 2:10 pm ET

I hope the mainstream media will have the good sense to keep investigating the Palin story with vigor, and not be intimdated by the hollow Republican posturing. The Republicans tried the same kinds of intimidation tactics in the wake of 9/11 and during the run-up to war in Iraq. They want us to believe that any resonable doubts about their poor decision-making are somehow unpatriotic, or in this case, sexist. My sense, though, is that Americans have had enough. We have the right to know the full story on what now looks like a very poor VP choice by Senator Macain.

Dave   September 3rd, 2008 2:10 pm ET

First i would like to mention that Nader has the right of any american to have a third party candidacy. The problem Nader has is raising money.

Second:
McCain is crying over his running mate, Palin, getting hammered by the press, to bad. The press is just doing it's job. How do we know who is the really person, trust McCain?

Kentucky   September 3rd, 2008 2:10 pm ET

A 6 month vetting process? I find that totally impossible to believe. This woman, although the GOP seems to think otherwise, needs to tend to the business at home and leave the rest of us alone. I find anyone who would first off, go back to work 3 days after giving birth to a child with special needs, totally lacking in any sense of responsibilty. Any mother will tell you that is a very important bonding time between a mother and baby. Nevermind, she doesn't strike me as the motherly type anyway. Way to ambitious and not VP material for any number of reasons

Another question.....why is it that you never see her or her husband hold that child? Looks like the baby gets taken care of by its siblings.

We have enough issues in this country, we don't need the star of Peyton Place (Alaska version) and her brood adding anymore drama.

The Republicans are comedic GOLD!   September 3rd, 2008 2:10 pm ET

Man, this just gets funnier by the second.

Chad in Cincinnati   September 3rd, 2008 2:10 pm ET

Even though the corporate press is lazy, dumb and bought, they can smell a story thats going to push ratings. What does Steve Schmidt think is going to happen when they drop a complete unknown with radical views and a checkered past onto the ticket? The surprise nomination might have blunted Obama's bounce from the end of the Democratic convention, but it opened up enough scandal angles that this is going to be in the news for at least a month. Now, the question is, can you stomach it, eh, Johnny-boy?

Adam   September 3rd, 2008 2:10 pm ET

Ted,

Dems good ole boys? You do realize the candidate is an African American. As for those stating Obama is spreading this mess, he has come out strong stating families are off limits. I stated this long ago. Anybody with a computer could have found this stuff. It is what happens when you run for one of the highest offices in the land. The one thing I take offense to is everytime something negative is said about her, its sexist. That is just not true! The fact is the McCain campaign stated it was not about issues, it was about casting the people involved. To me, that is truly sad. The focus needs to be on what these candidates will do for the American people. So far, we have heard nothing from the McCain campaign except spin.

DAR   September 3rd, 2008 2:10 pm ET

OH ENOUGH OF YOUR WHINING! SHE IS IN THE NATIONAL PUBLIC SPOTLIGHT AND SHE WILL BE EXAMINED AND JUDGED AS FIT OR UNFIT BY THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SINCE YOUR FEEBLE MINDED BUSH BUDDY CAN'T SEEM TO UNDERSTAND WHAT IT MEANS TO VETT SOMEONE PROPERLY... I AM SO TIRED OF THE REPUBLICANS CRYING SEXISM AND EVERYTHING ELSE- THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WANT TO KNOW- WHAT IS PALIN'S FOREIGN POLICY EXPERIENCE- WHAT DOES SHE KNOW ABOUT THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION AND OUR FREEDOMS AND RIGHTS (OTHER THAN TOTING A GUN!)- WHAT IS HER EXPERIENCE- WHAT IS HER MOTIVATION- WHY DID SHE JOIN A POLITICAL GROUP THAT ADVOCATES SECESSION OF ALASKA FROM THE UNION-WHAT IS HER VIEWS ON SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE- WOMEN'S RIGHTS- THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WANT TO KNOW AND SINCE WE DON'T HAVE DIRECT ACCESS WE HAVE PEOPLE LIKE CAMPBELL BROWN, KEITH OLBERMAN AND EVEN KATIE CURIC AND ALL THE OTHER MEDIA WORLD WIDE TO ASK QUESTIONS FOR US- DEAL WITH IT OR GET OUT OF THE RACE CUZ WE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE SICK OF REPUBLICAN SPIN, LIES, FABLES, FAIRY TALES AND FAKE INTELLIGENCE. IN THE WORDS OF THE LATE GREAT JOHN LENNON- " GIMME SOME TRUTH!"

DJ   September 3rd, 2008 2:10 pm ET

"LET HE WHO IS WITHOUT SIN CAST THE FIRST STONE…."

Really? Since when is THIS a republican value? I wonder what kind of 'unconditional love and support' the daughter would get if she were a lesbian . . .

Al Ram   September 3rd, 2008 2:10 pm ET

You cannot destroy somebody who is already destroyed. Family values?

Arkansas Undertaker   September 3rd, 2008 2:09 pm ET

TO: The McCain Campaign, The Reuplican Party and Governor Sarah Palin:

WELCOME TO AMERICAN POLITICS!!!!!

Hardy   September 3rd, 2008 2:09 pm ET

I say let them destroy her. She has no business being VP. She's corrupt, mired in scandal in her own home state and she's trying to run on the platform of political reform? Can you say PHONEY? Everyone who isn't blind knows this was a compromise pick by McCain that wasn't given any thought. He only met the lady ONCE in his life prior to offering her a spot on the ticket. That's the sort of carelessnes we need to get away from.

Deb, Oklahoma   September 3rd, 2008 2:09 pm ET

Let the voters make their own choice. Like every other news event the media has to go drama on us.

CitizenS   September 3rd, 2008 2:09 pm ET

It is unbelievable that McCain would question Obama on ALL decisions of judgement, yet his vetting process or lack thereof, can not be questions because he has no answers. So, as usual this is only a democracy when he deems it to be through his heroic effors. How much does the man have to show that he is lacking in several areas before people get wise to this fact.

Judith   September 3rd, 2008 2:09 pm ET

Stop he nonsense about Obama having no exec experience-Ms. Palin is kitchen table politics vs someone who visualized a campaign that turned campaigning on its ear–he oversees an operation that has several thousand employees and a monthly budget of many millions-far more than Palin and company ever dreamed of. He's smart, educated, believes in his family. Yes, he's not a redneck ... that last thing this country needs at the controls.

M. Winners, Mesa, AZ   September 3rd, 2008 2:09 pm ET

The "fear, smear, mock and lie" Rovian strategy once again rears it's ugly head – Only this time the repugs have put the press in their cross hairs.
Don't give in to this old diversionary tactic MSM – keep asking, probing, questioning – that's your job and let the chips fall where they may.
PS: Look who's whining now – It's the neocon repugs!!!

SCM DC   September 3rd, 2008 2:09 pm ET

Spin, spin, spin... The GOP and the McCain campaign are having a really tough time defending Deer-Hunter-Palin! According to two 'knowledgeable McCain officials', Palin was not subjected to a lengthy in-person background interview until last Wednesday! So what are they talking about when they say that she went through a 'thorough vetting process"? Come on GOP, admit it, you messed this one up! And stop blaming the Obama campaign and the media. They didn't choose her, McSame did!

Obama/Biden 08

goutgrec   September 3rd, 2008 2:09 pm ET

Now the McWhiners are trying to blame the media for the Sarah Shockers instead of taking responsibility for their own dumb moves.

They didn't vet her properly. So they are trying to paint her as some type of heroine. It's hilarious.

Then they fly in the 18 year old baby daddy and put him on the tarmac. What's next? The wedding tonight on the podium following her speech with the ceremony by Jerry Falwell?

It's so trashy. What kind of example does a female nominee for VP set when her own daughter might not finish high school?

Truth is, the Republican party is so degraded Palin is the best they can do. This is not about experience. This is about good judgment - and obviously neither Palin nor McCain has any.

Danny   September 3rd, 2008 2:09 pm ET

She was an AIP member, there is video evidence. She fired people as mayor because they didn't sponsor her bid for mayor. She tried to have books banned. She was a director of Sen. Steven's 527 election group. She dragged her poor child out into the open KNOWING a frenzy would follow. All of this is proven and shows McCain's lack of judgment. There is no conspiracy its fact, time to own up, oh yeah these are republicans.

Awaiting Moderation, check the facts and report them. Call the Alaska Elections Bureau and find that Todd Palin was an AIP from 95-02

Mark - California   September 3rd, 2008 2:09 pm ET

It's funny people sit down and write out their complaints that the media is trying to destroy the first woman republican candidate for VP, stop trying to make this a female issue. Whenever someone attacks a woman on her experience and ability to potentially run this country you people want to say it's sexist.

The media has everyone right to look deep and long into Palin's life professional and personal. Someone has to vet her since the McCain camp didn't.

Annette   September 3rd, 2008 2:09 pm ET

Well since I am part of the American people, now the McCain camp understand the mess Obama with through, throughout this long campaign process of smears and rumors and flat out lies.

ton   September 3rd, 2008 2:08 pm ET

Obama:
B.A in political science from Columbia University, with a specialization in international relations
J.D. in Law from Hardvard, graduated magna cum laude; President of the Harvard Law Review
12 years (92-04) teaching constitutional law
7 years State Senator: sponsored more than 800 bills
4 years Senator for Illinos, a state with 12.8 million people

Foreign Observer- did you see the special that CNN ran. Obama has been a senator for 3 years – a year and a half was spent running for president. In the state senate he spent a great deal of his time being very "political" in his votes and behavior in order to move up to the U.S. senate. I think he met with the godfather? -watch the show- who told him to get friendly with everyone, learn to golf and play poker- I believe Michelle said he was gone so much it strained their marriage. He voted present over 100 times as a political ploy so that he could not be helad accountable for his votes. He has sold himself to America has an outsider and a person of change and it is an absolute joke because he knows and always had played politics. I didn't know also that being a teacher at a super liberal institution was a good qualification for being the president of the United States. Sarah palin has come across so far as a real person who has taken on the hold nonsense of politics and I applaud that. She seems to be what Obama is trying to pretend to be but isn't. That might be why the media is really after her.

SDunn   September 3rd, 2008 2:08 pm ET

Iowa and proud if it September 3rd, 2008 1:51 pm ET

As usual…. all the dims can do is bash this and bash that. No substance, just blogs. No facts, just whining. No solutions, just speeches. No idea, just ignorance. No Bama, just fine for America.
--------------------------------
Actually there is a lot of substance here regarding Palin and the investigations that she is under. The McCain campaign is made up of a bunch of hypocrites because they're the actual sexists. McCain called Hillary's child ugly saying that Janet Reno was the father. He doesn't think highly of women or their rights and his record is clear regarding women. You McCain supporters are also a bunch of hypocrites because you don't mind calling Obama and Michelle names, making false accusations, with no substance, but finally when your candidate is scrutinized with true facts you have a problem!!

Bill   September 3rd, 2008 2:08 pm ET

Well, it is too late now, but if republicans were actually thinking, they would put Romney as the VP – that way they would still loose, but at least everybody would appreciate that they really tried their best this year...

For those republicans here who still did not get it – get over it – you've lost already – you've got nothing to stop Obama's wave of change! – have you traveled across this great country lately to see what is happening for yourself?!

Still, good luck to you, republicans, trying to rebuild your party in 4-8 years – maybe then you'll have a competitive ticket.

Bobbie   September 3rd, 2008 2:08 pm ET

I believe Palin can handle anything the Dems dish out. She is tough and won't whine like the Dems. Obama is a real joke. He stands up there and says absolutely nothing and the Dems fall all over themselves. Good luck in November.

Kansas   September 3rd, 2008 2:08 pm ET

The fact of the matter is that the media is doing their job, period. That McCain and Schmidt are whining about it means nothing and will change nothing. They just don't like seeing their candidate exposed for the small-time experience that she has and the dangerous religious extremist that she is. The media would do the same if a Dem candidate as unqualified as Palin was suddenly thrust into the national spotlight. It's part of their job as watchdogs of America though they often fall short as in failing to pursue the false wmd intelligence that led to the Iraq war.

This is just a risky candidate, period. Palin should not be on the ticket. The McCain camp should regroup and choose again.

Not fooled   September 3rd, 2008 2:08 pm ET

So...the mccain camp is getting snarky because they media is doing the vetting for them?

McCain should have taken this nomination more seriously – it seems this was a knee-jerk reaction to being told he couldn't have Lieberman.

If they would have vetted her they would have had responses prepared for anything they found – or he would not have selected her.

His mistake and now he whines....put your big girl panties on McCain, it's gonna be a rough ride.

barbara   September 3rd, 2008 2:08 pm ET

Why hasn't Governor Palin given any interviews? What is she waiting for? I would pay much more attention to an interview than a vicious attack against your opponents. In regards to her speech, It should be very good considering she has been spending the last two days in hiding.

Got Reform?   September 3rd, 2008 2:08 pm ET

Extreme religious beliefs that affect your policy decisions do not equal reform.
They keep saying how she "takes on her own party". She is an AIP schill in the Republican party so she is doing exactly what she is supposed to do. Lying about your actual party affiliation and motivations is not reform.

Jim   September 3rd, 2008 2:08 pm ET

If only the same tough media scrutiny with Obama as they have done with Clinton and Palin then clearly Clinton would have been the nominee. It took them weeks, months to come out on something with Obama and then downplayed as much as possible. All Clinton or Palin have to do is sneeze and they are all over it like a blanket. Hard to believe our own media is so sexist especially with so many of them being women.

funny   September 3rd, 2008 2:08 pm ET

"The Dems and the Media are just scared that the Reps are going to win in Nov.

McCAIN/PALIN 2008

PALIN/HUCKBEE 2012}"

Are you implying that McCain is going to die and Palin will become president and run for re-election in 2012?

I believe CNN reported that she has in fact commanded the Alaskan National Guard. They said she deployed them to put out some wild fires in Alaska. Oh, and I thought it was pretty funny when someone says that she stares down the Russians across the Bering Straight every day.

kizito   September 3rd, 2008 2:08 pm ET

We got them where we wanted , Repulican = hypocrit ..What a shame to blame the media for vetting a VP candidate – If anything you should thank the media for doing your job- - Even to get a job at McDonald you interview for more than 15 minutes....
Sean Hannity or Rush Limbaugh are worse..

chuck   September 3rd, 2008 2:07 pm ET

anyone who actually believes that sarah palin has more experience than obama should really take a long hard look in the mirror. to make that kind of suggestion is absolutely ludicrous.

seriously, i wonder about the kinds of people who actually believe that.

and another thing... the mccain camp has got to stop touting how important experience is to them. they selected possibly the most inexperienced choice for their v.p. candidate.

all of you who are blaming the media... grow up. stop getting mad at the people who actually want answers and are asking questions. start getting mad at the mccain camp. the obviously messed up BIG TIME.

go, obama.

NG in DC   September 3rd, 2008 2:07 pm ET

From McSame to McSHAME!!!!!!

Jatovi, NC   September 3rd, 2008 2:07 pm ET

It's sad to see the ignorance that is out there.
---------–

"You choose – a proven bi-partisan leader, war hero John McCain and the a reform Governor Sara Palin from outside of Broken Washington or a community organizer Obama with no executive experience with less than 150 working days in the Senates with no accomplishments and a proven partisan Like Joe Biden who has come down on the wrong side of history so many times in the past 35 years it isn’t even funny.

I choose John McCain the War hero and Sara the Moose hunter over the Communist Obama and the plagiarist Joe biden"

--------

Palin is un-qualified. Nothing against her but it's true. McCain only picked her to get the women's vote. She is unknown. The only group that knew her are those in Alaska, and there she is not as great as they've made her out to be. By the way this is not sexist, it's true.

Ally   September 3rd, 2008 2:07 pm ET

Sarah Palin's Church is questionable. They have anti-semitic views. It will be interesting to see if the media covers this as part of her "vetting process". I doubt they will.

AdamW   September 3rd, 2008 2:07 pm ET

For someone who claims to have endured years in a prison camp he sure does cry and whine a lot.

Does McCain remember how the Bush campaign destroyed him and beat him to be the GOP candidate 8 years ago? DO the Republicans want a candidate that couldn't even beat Bush? Really? McCain is second string and his VP Palin is a patsy and a tool who is being used for their agenda.

Wake up Republicans! You ar eall being played!

A first lady that is a drug addict, plastic surgery junky and a VP who abuses her power, encourages underage sex and can't manage her own family and a president that doesn't even know how many homes he owns wants to manage this country? Come on!

Fritz   September 3rd, 2008 2:07 pm ET

Ah yes – blame the liberal media – the same liberal media that runs negative articles about Obama 72% versus 28% positive for Obama. And runs negative articles on McCain only 43% of the time and 57% positive.
I thought the Republicans were used to watching Faux News anyway.

JohnBoy   September 3rd, 2008 2:07 pm ET

Obama is going the same route as Loser John Kerry and his fake war record. The american people will not vote for a left wing liberal. Liberals are un-american.

McCain 08

Ardnuas   September 3rd, 2008 2:07 pm ET

He picks someone he met ONCE.... and NOW we can't ask any questions? This is a SERIOUS RED FLAG AMERICA....BEWARE.

Laurie   September 3rd, 2008 2:07 pm ET

just saw the box in the right that these are not post that are put on all that writing for nothing you would never put what i wrote up. or will you

it has been five minutes and nothing...............not surprised just like the cnn demy channel!!!!!!!!!!

Carmen Colorado   September 3rd, 2008 2:07 pm ET

Nobody but the Repubs are talking about the daughter. The items that need to come out is the report on how Palin fires and replaces people that she does not want. That sounds familiar, since Bush and his administration have replaced, and fired people that Bush did not want . We do not need another person like that, one (McCain) is enough. Lets get back to the real issues. The repubs can give it but can not take it. The resume for president is more than motherhood and winning a beauty contest and religion.

Louis   September 3rd, 2008 2:07 pm ET

McCAIN, YOU'VE GOT TO BE KIDDING: After they scrutinized Obama as far back as his schooling at age 4, they should not be surprised that Palin's recent leadership record and personal character are evaluated

The World   September 3rd, 2008 2:06 pm ET

You call it a SCANDAL.
I call it holding our leaders ACCOUNTABLE!

OBAMA/BIDEN '08

Tina   September 3rd, 2008 2:06 pm ET

The media and the public digging into Palin's life is completely warranted, as she is virtually unknown to America. What the conservative right is really worried about is not that Palin is being victimized by the media, but rather further public discussion of her daughter's pregnancy might lead to a meaningful conversation about how the conservative right's policies (abstinence only education) are rarely effective for their own families, let alone the American people at large.

ss   September 3rd, 2008 2:06 pm ET

Don't bring Hillary into this. Palin doesn't come close to Hillary Rodman Clinton. More Republican Bush/Chaney Politics. Unite Dems – Great convention now it time to raise the roof and take back the White Houe.

DMC   September 3rd, 2008 2:06 pm ET

Unfair to woman? Really? I am a woman and I don't think any of this is unfair or sexist. She's a candidate running for the second highest office in the land. We deserve to know the good and the bad.

Unfortunately in their hasty decision to select this candidate to be their VP choice they selected a lot of baggage as well. If the shoe were on the other foot, believe me, R's would not hesitate to hammer home the faults. But I guess McCain wants to forget the 2000 primary fight between he and his Buddy Bush.

All is fair in love and war. And believe me this party loves war. I watched bits and pieces of the R convention and it look to me to be all about war. What about the economy, the housing crisis, the loss of jobs. The missing elements are so obvious. I guess they can't run on issues because they have none. They seem to like things just the way they are.

And yet, They picked a Pres/Vp ticket that are, supposed to be, about bucking the party? Why do their candidates 'have to' buck them? What's wrong with the party that their candidates have to 'Buck Them."

It seems that the arguments are fighting themselves. Or is the 'Republic Party' fighting itself?

It seems to me that The 'Republic Party' is so desperate they will say anything to convince America (or maybe themselves) that they will be different this time around. Why should we believe them? What have they done as a Party to makes us believe them?

They had control for 6 years; Executive, Senate and House. Doesn't anyone remember that? What did they do with all that power? Nothing for the country. They did it all for the party. They were so drunk with power they couldn't see straight. And now, we're reaping the result of their power hungry folly today.

Do we really want to go back there? Is that what the American People really want? I know their are many who are happy with the country's state. The rich, the business CEO's, China, the people who live in fear...

The baggage surrounding Palin is the not the fault of the Media or the Dems. It's the fault of a desperate candidate who hastily selected his VP. She was selected to shore up a lack luster base who didn't like their candidate, no matter what they're spinning. And boy are they spinning...and so is my head.

I know their are more hypocrisies to point out, but I am tired. I am tired of the 'Republic Party' "Win at any cost, even if it's not in the Best Interest of the Country." Winning is more important than anything.

They are selling old themes, old attacks and old rhetoric. They need a new tune, this one is getting warn out.

Obama/Biden '08

Harry Whittington   September 3rd, 2008 2:06 pm ET

If you go hunting with this potential VP, I just hope that she is a better shot than Cheney!

Thats funny, the Same Ole Dirty Smear Party is complaining that the media (implying they are all Democrats) is trying to smear Palin. Every canditate, espcecially one applying for such an important position, can expect that their past will be examined.

Who cares that her daughter is pregnant. Thousands of teens much younger than she is having sex. I wonder why her mother would accept the position knowing that the job would require so much of her time that she would not be there for her daughter at a time like this.

What is more alarming is that she may have abused her position while claming to be an ethics reformer or that she MAY have been part of a group calling for Alaska to seek independence from the USA.

I dont see how you can say that someone who has only served as Gov for a year and a half has more experience then a Senator who has served on the Security Committee and has actually travelled outside the US.

The media has the right to ask these questions and expect more than the dodge and spin of the GOP.

Besides. If the opposite of PRO is CON what is the opposite of PROGRESS?

Were BOTH Paris and Britney BUSY!   September 3rd, 2008 2:06 pm ET

How is Palin going to run this country if McCrypt always speaks for her?

What if he is not there?

Time to move on   September 3rd, 2008 2:06 pm ET

Obama is the best man for the president of United States of America.Sound man in a sound body.Highly intelligent.
OBAMA/BIDEN 08

rey   September 3rd, 2008 2:06 pm ET

GO CHINA.

Oh really?   September 3rd, 2008 2:06 pm ET

*Cue violins*

*Flashback*
Democratic Primaries, spreading lies about Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.

GOP Hypocrites.

Marilyn   September 3rd, 2008 2:06 pm ET

I agree. Enough already. The Obama cult has driven me away from the Democratic Party and I doubt that I will ever return.

R.M.   September 3rd, 2008 2:06 pm ET

Common' whiners!!

CitizenS   September 3rd, 2008 2:05 pm ET

By the way, a vote for McCain is a vote for quick, shoot from the hip let's go to war and WIN, McCain.

ose   September 3rd, 2008 2:05 pm ET

its funny to me how they say Palin is more qualified than Obama because she has executive experience. According to that logic isn't she more qualified than McCain too?

My university was bigger than the town where she was mayor, my student government had more staff than she did (she had 50 people under her as mayor), lets thing people. Because someone is a mayor or governor doesn't make them qualified. Abraham Lincoln had similar qualifications to senator Obama I'm sure back then they said he was unqualified too. Or even JFK, he wasn't a governor but you cant say that they were not good for the country.

Jen   September 3rd, 2008 2:05 pm ET

How is it that it's ok for Sarah Palin to exploit her youngest son's down syndrome and her oldest son's enrollment in the military to show her devotion to pro-life causes and the military, but her daughter's pregnancy is somehow off limits even though Palin is vocally anti-contraception, pro-abstinence only and anti-sex education? Can someone please explain this?

Strength in Obama   September 3rd, 2008 2:05 pm ET

In the words of my favorite person on CNN, "Republicans – grow up and stop whinning" Roland gives it to you straight up!

Dr.Jimmy   September 3rd, 2008 2:05 pm ET

Wait till the real pictures come out.

Peter Zheutlin   September 3rd, 2008 2:05 pm ET

The vetting process IS the issue because it reflects directly on McCain's judgment and decision making. Forget Palin's policy positions for the moment - he chose a running mate he barely knows and it's abundantly clear the process was less than rigorous. This old "blame the media" game is pathetic. If they can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen. Look, every candidate who endured the lenthy primary seasons was vetted by the press and the public for 20 months. Based on one man's judgment, Sarah Palin could be a heart beat away. She hasn't been vetted by the public or the press, only by the McCain campaign and they've only allowed her to speak to People Magazine since she was named. The McCain camp knows they blew it big time but they will look to blame anyone but themselves. Sounds ike a certain incumbent president. The buck stops somewhere else.

Deb, Allentown, PA   September 3rd, 2008 2:05 pm ET

Why CNN, why?

Your comment is awaiting moderation.
This is ridiculous, and the first two posters to this ticker item are delusional. Obama's been raked over the coals, the smear ads from the McCain camp have been played for free by the media, and yet now the Republicans are crying foul because people are RIGHTFULLY questioning the qualifications of this right-wing nutjob Governor??

Dr. Mimi De La Cruz   September 3rd, 2008 2:05 pm ET

PALIN DOESN'T EVEN BEGIN TO IN ANY WAY

EARN MY VOTE. IN FACT I, AS A WOMAN, AM

INSULTED BY MCSENILE'S CHOICE.

SHE IS NO HILLARY. SHE IS NOT ME. SHE IS NOT

MY SISTERS, NOT EVEN MY MOTHER IS THAT BACKWARD

THINKING.SHE IS A FEMALE VERSION OF MCWORSE.

SHE WOULD HAVE BEEN GREAT FOR THE 1820S, MAYBE.

NOT NOW AND NOT HERE.

Oh Please!!   September 3rd, 2008 2:05 pm ET

McCain camp–please STOP with this faux outrage! Your boy screwed up! He couldn't stick to his guns and make a logical decision when it mattered and now he wants the media to ignore this? Please! I would have more respect for him if he would have chosen Lieberman; I may have even considered that ticket. This just shows he has very bad judgement and doesn't need to be awarded for it. Obama/Biden all the way!

CC Atlanta   September 3rd, 2008 2:05 pm ET

But McCain's own aides say in a Washington Post article today:

"Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin was not subjected to a lengthy in-person background interview with the head of Sen. John McCain's vice presidential vetting team until last Wednesday in Arizona, the day before McCain asked her to be his running mate, and she did not disclose the fact that her 17-year-old daughter was pregnant until that meeting, two knowledgeable McCain officials acknowledged Tuesday. "

Peter   September 3rd, 2008 2:05 pm ET

Perhaps Sen McCain should have gone with first first choice for VP rather than having to deal with the mess caused by having to find an acceptable alternative at the last minute. A true leader would have picked his own VP and not deferred such an important decision to right wing radio commentators.

bob   September 3rd, 2008 2:05 pm ET

The reason the majority of the media focus is on Sarah Palin is becasue she is the new, unknown quantity. The media has had 18 months to dig up every skeleton in the closets of John McCain, Barrack Obama and Joe Biden since all three were running for President in that time frame. They are now going to do the same thing to Sarah Palin. That is not sexist, nor an organized attempt to destroy her, it is the same think each of the other three candidates had to endure and she will have to as well. By choosing a relatively unknown wild card, the McCain campaign should have expected this.

Ken Pittsburgh   September 3rd, 2008 2:05 pm ET

let see if I got this right McCain picks someone at the last mintue to be his veep choice and she is a mother of a special neede cnewborn and who 17 unwed daughter is expeting if Palin was a Dem they would have burned her at the stake by now.

TB from FL   September 3rd, 2008 2:05 pm ET

Decrying media scruitiny of Palin as sexist seems like a poor strategy. McCain has elevated a political unknown to the national spotlight and people have valid concerns over her professionalism and her politics. "No more comment" from the Straight Talk Express? Sorry, that's not going to win my vote.

blaising   September 3rd, 2008 2:04 pm ET

very poor decision making on McGook's part.

MD   September 3rd, 2008 2:04 pm ET

It appears Nancy Pelosi thinks a woman like sarah Palin is very qualified to be VP. Check out the her interview in this months Ladies Home Journal.
LHJ: Do you think we'll have to wait as long again for another potential female president?
NP: No, I don't. First of all, Hillary Clinton is still here and young enough to run again in a number of years, but there are also women in the House, in the Congress, and in the governorships. It won't be long before it won't be unusual for us to have viable, strong women candidates for President of the United States. And I take great joy in that thought
LHJ: You are a mother of five and were a homemaker for many years before entering politics. You say in your book that the skills you honed doing those things were the same ones you needed when you got to Congress. How so?
NP: Absolutely, and this is what I want women to know, so they recognize the value of their own path, their unique experience. I've been in politics a while, over 20 years in the Congress of the United States, and this is a very rough-and-tumble.... I shouldn't say 'rough,' let me say a very challenging arena to be in. But as challenging as it is, nothing is as challenging as raising a family - nothing. That experience forced me to be disciplined, diplomatic, focused, and successful, and I brought that discipline and focus to the Congress. Also, having a family keeps you focused on the future, which is the biggest inspiration in politics. In order to do what it takes to succeed in politics, you have to be inspired by your constituents, the power of your ideas, and the fact that you speak on behalf of children and their future, whether you have children of your own or not. It makes all the difference in the world.
LHJ: Women since the dawn of time have struggled to balance their careers with their families. What advice would you give to women who are trying to achieve that very elusive balance? Do you think it's possible?
NP: Yes, I think it is, and what I tell women is, you are doing the best you can, even if it's not the best you know how. You can't control every aspect, so don't worry about not measuring up. Just know that it's the best you can do, and know that if you succeed in being a mother, you can succeed in any arena. There's nothing to compare it to. And I always say know your power. That's how I got the title for my book. Mothers have so much power. They have the power to make a difference in the lives of these little people they're raising, and the power to make a difference in the world in which they will grow up and then live. That's a key message of my book. I want women to recognize the value of their unique experience. And in Congress, I've made it my special mission to be a voice for young working women.

Tony in Michigan   September 3rd, 2008 2:04 pm ET

Oh after 50 plus years on this earth,I finally get it.When we are ALL told She's qualified too be the VP of the United States ,Thats It ,Just believe US !!!Even if you don't know squat about her,just believe us!!We got it handled for You.LOL very funny!!! I gave up being a blind sheep long ago.SORRY. We are entitled too know who the heck she is!!

Seriously!?!   September 3rd, 2008 2:04 pm ET

The woman can not manage her own family, she has 20 months as a governor under her belt, lives in a remote party of the country and has barely traveled outside of the country and you think McCain showed his great decision making skills off by choosing her. I am a woman and would love to see a woman in office, but seriously someone that is in touch with American women not just the right wing religous finatics. She wants to teach creationism in our public schools let me remind you of one the fundamentals that our country was founded on, the separation of church and state, what she proposes and stands for is quite frankly unAmerican. I am very saddened that McCain made such an irresponsible "political" decision, he is hoping to rally all these right wing people that stood behind Rove, DIck, and George in 2000 and he shoul be absolutely ashamed to be pandering to them now. Seriously disappointed!!!

Terry from GA   September 3rd, 2008 2:04 pm ET

Sarah Palin needs to go through the same "vetting" process that Barack went through. If she is such a great candidate, why is the McCain campaign getting so defensive when simple questions are asked ?

59 year old white guy from the South   September 3rd, 2008 2:04 pm ET

I'm not so disingenuous as to suggest that gender didn't have something to do with why Sen. Obama hasn't been asked about juggling raising children and running for public office. But really, Sasha and Malia aren't going to require the type of attention that Trig will, and they aren't going to make grandparents out of the Obamas for several years. Bristol is a baby having a baby. Asking how she will allocate her time is a legitimate question for Gov. Palin, the flag bearer for family values.

Joe   September 3rd, 2008 2:04 pm ET

Here! Here!

The media is just panicking because the GOP is fired up!

pittsfield maine   September 3rd, 2008 2:04 pm ET

I do believe that the media is trying to destroy her just because she does not fit the norm. I am a woman and I juggled two kids and a high level job, long hours, and traveling. It was not easy. However, she deserves respect. As for her daughter being pregnant; it takes two to tango. I would be more embarressed if an adult married male fathered a child then scoping and probing into her daughter. I do believe that she is what we need. Someone that is not like the majority of the politicians who speak and do not deliver and do not want to challenge anything that they feel is not right. Maybe she will bring some respect back to the Whitehouse; she is a strong female and that is what we need not someone who bites the bullet for self satisfaction and still stands by her man.

SM   September 3rd, 2008 2:04 pm ET

Yes, how DARE we question the GOP? If they say she's ok, she must be and we have NO business questioning their decisions.

Ron Sampson   September 3rd, 2008 2:04 pm ET

"faux media scandal"??? "liberal media"???? Haaaa! Good belly laugh again from the specialists at Karl Rove Damage Control Center, Inc.!!! There is still time to dump the suspect Mrs. Palin, now that would demonstrate character & sound judgement. The circus they've got going in Minnesota is absolutely hilarious...

Vern   September 3rd, 2008 2:04 pm ET

Now that the shoe is on the other foot we see just how whining the Reps are ..LOL! Stop the whining people. Take the truth like big boys & girl & move on!!!
Don't try to blame the Dems for this one...the last time I checked Palin is a conservative & it takes only 2 to make a baby..who are REP!!

becky   September 3rd, 2008 2:04 pm ET

I think the repubs might want to stop 'whining' about this woman's treatment.

The woman sticks her head in the sand about birth control, surprise – her kid gets knocked up and no one is supposed to notice? No one is supposed to criticize? She cannot manage her own household (by the way where was hubby while daughter was catting around?) and she is picked for vp?

Trust me, Hillary women will not vote for this person just because she's female.

If John McCain is serious about winning, he needs to try again for a VP.

Were BOTH Paris and Britney BUSY!   September 3rd, 2008 2:03 pm ET

Now we know McCrypt was not in the "cone of silence", but Palin sure is.

Can this loose cannon not speak for herself!

Baze   September 3rd, 2008 2:03 pm ET

This is hysterical... The G.O.P is using the "ole boy" argument for their notorioiusly one sided political view.

NotFallingInLine.org   September 3rd, 2008 2:03 pm ET

Carly Fiorina just said that the leadership of the Democratic Party faied to stand up against the gender bias in the media that so harmed Hillary Clinton AND THAT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY LEADERSHIP WON'T STAND BY AND LET SEXIST ATTACKS AGAINST SARAH PALIN GO UNANSWERED.

It's hard to count the ways in which the Palin choice is so perfect politically...

The leadership of the Democratic Party failed us all.

Suzanne   September 3rd, 2008 2:03 pm ET

Mr Schmidt has made a costly mistake on this one, completely underestimating the intelligence of the American people. Executives are not necessarily politicians and Sarah is not my idea of a new president dealing with international emergencies in the absence of McCain. They simply cannot hard sell Sarah into a leadership position of this magnitude. They have introduced another fear factor.

And, by the way, Democrats can keep babies out of wedlock too. The difference is they can choose.

isaiah - milford, nj   September 3rd, 2008 2:03 pm ET

fox news has been dedicated to destroying sen obama since january. write a memo about that.

Lost of CNN Moderation   September 3rd, 2008 2:03 pm ET

Wasn't it this Schmidt guy who just said yesterday that this campaign was not going to be about issues?

What do you expect when you take issues off the table, which clearly the democrats are leading on, and want to talk about the person. You get people scrutinizing the person and their principles.

My second point is this. If they hadn't have rolled out an unknown candidate 60 days before the election people wouldn't be scrambling to learn about her. It's completely their fault that the media and everyone else is trying to dig hard and fast to learn about her. I'm sure not liking what I'm learning.

BTW, I'm also from small town NC and the idiot with the first post in no way represents small town anywhere. I can not stand it when some people try and represent a whole block of people. ( i e picking Palin to court the female vote as if she has done anything FOR women). I'm pretty confident that the folks in small town NC will take a look at the fact that the Republicans have done NOTHING for small town NC or anywhere else and realize that we, as much if not more than Americans in other areas, can not afford to have another 4 yrs of George Bush policies.

Joe Average   September 3rd, 2008 2:03 pm ET

The media is ruthless, but what they (media) does not realize is that they are drawing more people to support Gov. Palin. There is a difference when you scrutinize a candidate for inexperience. And when you scrutinize a candidate's family. The liberal press only wants to destroy Gov. Palin!!!!!!

Alejandro Ochoa   September 3rd, 2008 2:03 pm ET

McCain is right! Since announcing Palin as vice president, media outlet wanted to know more about her past. The liberal media should investigate Obama's background with the same intensity.

As far as her daughter being pregnant, most parents teach their children about right and wrong and eventually it comes down to the individual kid to do what is right when no one is watching.

CitizenS   September 3rd, 2008 2:03 pm ET

Oh, what shoould we do, just be quiet while he loudly goes into the Presidency with a complete unintelligent, conniving, know nothing about managing a 5000 person mayoral office yet wants to be VP of an entire nation. Well, this is just a cover so his crony, VP Cheney can quietly go to Russia's neighbors and talk with the international OIL execs to secure their future compensation. All the while inciting Russia into a cold war stance. Unbelievable! WAKE UP voters, this is being done to instigate more military situations before the elections to enhance the fact that McCain spent most of his war time locked in a cell (which we are grateful for). But now he is out and wants to be your President that leads you valiantly to WAR. OMG....please look under your nose to see what the Repubs are up to. What is VP Cheney doing in Europe (giving away $1 billion we do not have) while we have major DOMESTIC economic issues here. Want more of the same vote for McCain!

Independent   September 3rd, 2008 2:03 pm ET

The attacks on Obama's wife were due in part to her opening her mouth and saying stupid things. That is his wife and possible First Lady. However, the daughter of the VP Republican is only 17 years old and will be nothing more than the possible VP's daughter. There are big differences in that. I would be disgusted if the Republicans attacked Obama's children as well. As far as I know they have not, only the comments of the Obamas's that were directred at their own children were commented on.

But never the less, the Re-VP has more experince than Obama does and he is going for the actual President spot of the United States... quite laughable if you ask me... and if you didn't, it is laughable none the less.

Ben   September 3rd, 2008 2:03 pm ET

Republicans are pathetic. They tried the same thing with Dan Quayle (blaming the media for negative perceptions) and it worked. I forget if Quayle ended up proving himself to be smart or not. "I stand by all the misstatements I have made" – Quayle 89'.

Debbie, Blue Springs, MO   September 3rd, 2008 2:03 pm ET

Hey.....IOWA AND PROUD OF IT........

Okay, lets talk issues:

OBAMA/BIDEN:
Right to choose
Equal pay
Healthcare for all Americans
Getting America off of foreing oil using all available options
Foreign diplomacy
Bring our troops home safe and sound
Going after Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan
Keeping America Safe
Stabilize Social Security and Medicare
Fair Taxes
Reduce our national debt
Educate all Americans would like to go to college

So, it is your turn. What does McCain have to offer besides a claim to keep America safe???

Hyprocrites   September 3rd, 2008 2:02 pm ET

You Republicans know good and well that if Obama or Biden had an unmarried teenager out there boning having unprotected sex and getting pregnant and than trying to cover it up, it would be over for them. You Republicans are hyprocrites.

if Mcsick dies, she'll be ur president !   September 3rd, 2008 2:02 pm ET

John McCain suffers 5 different degenerative diseases...he is 71 years old...is more likely then any other president b4 to die during presidency...just look how old bill Clinton and george Bush got after 8 years of presidency...

McCain chose as vp a woman he met once, a woman who:

has 20 month experience in a state who doesn't even have its own budget to manage...has a BS in journalism...was last miss Alaska...
Used her political influence to have the brother in law fired...

IF MCCAIN DIES ( not wishing him to...but it could happen)..SHE WILL BE THE NEXT US PRESIDENT...

you people better think about it...

jesus what a mess !

Albert   September 3rd, 2008 2:02 pm ET

It has been custom that when a vice presidential candidate is introduced, they are completely available to the press and are out there like Biden. Palin has been holed up in in a hotel room. Why? Lack of experience dealing with the awful truth and making up some lie to try to cover their errors. This is bush league and the Republicans are protesting too much because they messed up big time. This is a circus at best or a whacked out storyline from Jerry Springer.

With all the how

This whole Palin story is not about the press doing their job but the unprepared McCain camp trying to score some points and having it blow up in their in the face. It is about a mother who should be dedicated time to her children and putting her family first.

Peejay   September 3rd, 2008 2:02 pm ET

Let's face it, folks. Sarah Palin was foisted on McCain for her appeal to the "values" voters in the uber-conservative Republican base that McCain wasn't grabbing. If anyone's responsible for sloppy vetting it's the RNC. Once in the game, she is fair game. Both McCain and Palin, as the purported "against the flow" mavericks they claim to be, should be used to hearing opposing views. MSM is helping to make a circus out of a process that should focus on issues rather than anecdotes. Let's get real – the outcome of this election is a little more important than all this crap.

Obama-Biden08 and 2012   September 3rd, 2008 2:02 pm ET

No weapon forged against you [ Sen. Barack Obama ] will prevail, and you [ Sen. Barack Obama ] will refute every tongue that accuses you. This is the heritage of the servants of the LORD, and this is their [ Sen. Barack Obama ] vindication from me," declares the LORD. -
Isaiah 54:17

It's time for REAL change in Washington, it's time to elect Barack Obama for president. It's the Obama-Biden ticket that's needed at this defining moment in our history because this team is wiser and stronger to meet the challenges this nation faces at home and abroad.

Amen.

RyanD.   September 3rd, 2008 2:02 pm ET

McCain is just upset they had this big "look at the mother fo 5!" media roll-out planned for this week, taking big, happy photos for People MAgazine and such...and their thunder was stolen by the literally 20 horrendous facts about Palin that SHOULD HAVE BEEN found during vetting.

McCain lacks the judgement to be president.

ron r   September 3rd, 2008 2:02 pm ET

The only thing in question here is...McCain's judgement.....Other than not sharing any of her political views(which is all that should matter), I have nothing against this woman, however she is in no way, shape or form prepared to run this country should she be pressed into duty. She does however seem to be a perfect candidate to run your local PTA or fundraiser..

Nice   September 3rd, 2008 2:02 pm ET

Republicans will do anything , anything
to win. Crybabies!

Ben   September 3rd, 2008 2:02 pm ET

Jeffrey: Creationism bizarre? You need to read your Bible, son.

AJP Richardson, TX   September 3rd, 2008 2:02 pm ET

This group of Republican's are the biggest bunch of cry babies I have seen in a political party.

They always try to blame others but won't blame themselves.

They certainly don't project an image of what America stands for in the world community

dancindukes   September 3rd, 2008 2:02 pm ET

This from the party that did everything it could to convince the American Public that Obama is Muslim. As recently as last week in Seattle a McCain supporters were handing out $3 bills with Obama in Muslim headdress on the bills. Now that's just laughable.

McCain's judgment is seriously flawed. It is the news media's JOB to
uncover and report on stories about his VP pick. I agree that her minor children should be off limits. I do however EXPECT the press to tell me everything about her political record, as they did when the exposed the "anti pork" Gov. as mayor secured a $15 million buy in from DC to build a rail system from the town where she was mayor to the town where she had a vacation home. When the RNC throws around the word experience they have to be ready for a full review of her political and personal past in FACTS not in the fairy tale they are trying to ram down America's throats.

Danny in Chicago   September 3rd, 2008 2:02 pm ET

I LOVE THIS! Just keep buying bigger shovels Republicans! That hole is getting deeper and deeper – sooner or later you are ALL going to fall into it.

And you know what? I have NO PITY for you. I have friends risking their lives for your war that we didnt need to wage. People are dying and you say to stop picking on your candidates – AFTER you threw the kitchen sink at ours!!! You are terrible people Republicans........terrible TERRIBLE people to be so TWO-FACED! You've destroyed this country and yet you blame the democratic congress who's only been in office for two years......BLAME BLAME BLAME!!!! YOU are to BLAME! YOU = REPUBLICANS. YOU are the problem the LAST 8 YEARS!!!!

Get over yourself Republicans....you've had complete power and screwed it up. Face the truth – your armegeddon is already here

And you're on the wrong side!

Frank   September 3rd, 2008 2:01 pm ET

Dems are ruthless and not the type of people I want running our country!

Steve   September 3rd, 2008 2:01 pm ET

Yeah, That's the ticket! As someone said many years ago, "If she wants to be a Lumberjack, she has to be able to carry her end of the log.". If she wants to be in that spotlight, why should the media treat he differently. First, it was Hillary using the experience argument. Then it was McCain using the experience argument. Now it is the RNC saying "she has more experience then him". The whole thing sounds pretty lame.

twowetdogz   September 3rd, 2008 2:01 pm ET

I think that there is no way this lady is qualified to be Vice President. McCain is 72 now, and has had cancer 4 times. But, the democrats need to be very careful with this.

What they really need to do is get Hillary out there and let everybody know that just because Palin is a woman, that's not a reason to vote for McCain just to see her in the White House. Hillary should be out front on this, letting everybody know that Palin is a woman, but does not stand for anything that Hillary stood for.

Honestly, I am not a big Hillary fan, but if you compare the two, Palin would still be considered to be an infant in world politics, and I've see a lot of infants throw fits and do stupid things. I don't want an infant in charge of my country.

Martin Agnew   September 3rd, 2008 2:01 pm ET

The media wants Obama to win. Its that simple. They can't help themselves. Palin was a surprise to them and upset their stereotypes. They are afraid a fresh new female face on the Repubs side will derail the Obama. Anything that gets in Obama's way must by the media be derailed.

gene   September 3rd, 2008 2:01 pm ET

Vegas.. you're an idiot. You're another one of those idiots that blame Obama for any kind of objection that ANYONE has about the republican ticket.

Obama was the first to step up and say that family was off limits, and he's never attacked anyone's family. On the other hand... McCain's ads HAD attacked Michelle in the past... and have personally attacked Obama as well... in just about EVERY ad he's put out.

You must live in a cave.. or just have your eyes and ears closed and need to spew some hate.

And by the way... to all the feminists (this includes the whipped men as well)... any of you crazy whack jobs screaming that Obama's campaign is sexist see that video of McCain introducing Sarah Palin... I think his eyes spent more time on her back side than on anything else. Check it out.. they have it on the videos here.. and on YouTube.

pigo   September 3rd, 2008 2:01 pm ET

mccain aides do not have anything solid to say.so they cry loud and blame media for their ignorance.i am sick of people who call mccain a maverick

brian   September 3rd, 2008 2:01 pm ET

Linda, You are a liar. Are you even a woman?

Texas Woman   September 3rd, 2008 2:01 pm ET

Yes, the attacks are over the line, especially John Roberts's and Campbell Brown's comments about Palin being a bad mother for accepting the VP nod. However, I will defend Wolf Blitzer, Anderson Cooper, John King, and Dana Bash, as their coverage has been pretty fair.

Lucas, Nashville TN   September 3rd, 2008 2:01 pm ET

Call the WAAAAHMBULANCE.

Kim, New York   September 3rd, 2008 2:01 pm ET

No one knew anything about Palin when McCain introduced her, so the media did it's job in attempting to educate us about her. Nothing More, Nothing Less. McCain wants to control her image and feed us Propaganda, but this is a democracy with freedom of the press –not China! If he had taken proper measures to get her name out in advance, or have info available, that might have slowed some of the chatter.

They have dogged every part of Obama's life, including his wife and former pastor, but finds it offensive to have the tables turned. Get over it!

steve   September 3rd, 2008 2:01 pm ET

maybe if McCain had spent a few hours checking her out before trying to foist her on the American people ther would not BE a scandal. What a joke. THIS WOMAN, not all women, is a train wreck. I Evangelical poser who cannot even keep her own life in order. This speaks volumes about McCains judgment. There are a lot of VERY qualified, non-wacko women out there that would be great VPs. Sarah is not one of them. period.

FL Dem   September 3rd, 2008 2:01 pm ET

Vegas, you are an idiot!

the stories are not lies, but truths.

Lieberman is the one telling lies

Republicans Hate America   September 3rd, 2008 2:01 pm ET

and Palin wants to destroy America

Annie R.   September 3rd, 2008 2:01 pm ET

I'm a woman who loves my country, and would love to see a woman as President some day. That said, Palin is an unknown, and there are some serious questions here I for one would like answered. Is she a religious fanatic who hides behind God to justify hate? Was she or her husband part of a group that wants to see Alaska secede from the US. These are some serious allegations, folks, and I'd like answers, not just a put-off by McCain, et al. She could be our President if he wins!

Wilma O'Callaghan   September 3rd, 2008 2:01 pm ET

jSuggestionj: Count the actual days that Obama was sitting on a chair in the Senate and listeningto US Govt Business. Then - Along with the number of times he voted on Gov,. Stuff–not for a cookie and coffee –then compare that number to the opportunities he had to vote., When he was absent, where was he promoting himself for President ?

So who has more experience? AK Gov. or OBama?

Matt   September 3rd, 2008 2:01 pm ET

What GALL these Republicans have ! They can spin fake facts and tales about Obama, but when people question Palin's past they cry FOUL. A double standard here for sure. Where was/is the fairness when Obama is accused of being a Muslim, etc. ???

no trickle down...   September 3rd, 2008 2:00 pm ET

"picked his governing partner after a long and thorough search"

Oh, so it wasn't a rushed mistake.... that does show a VERY worrying lack of judgment by McCain then.

"The American people get to do the vetting now on Election Day – November 4th."

Yes they will!

Obama/Biden 08/12

ExDem from PA   September 3rd, 2008 2:00 pm ET

I cannot believe the Democrats slandering Palin the way they are after they just got through watching Hillary Clinton be taken down by the media. What hypocrisy.

I happen to think Sarah Palin is a GREAT choice for the Republican ticket offering a more clear message of Change than Obama who chose a washington insider for VP.

Furthermore, if Gov Palin were a 44 year old, up and coming, Republican white male Gov of a small state – everyone would be applauding McCain's decision to choose "the future of the Republican Party".

By stating that Palin has "no experience" all the Democrats are doing is highlighting the fact that it is the TOP of their ticket, Obama, that has even LESS experience. What makes Obama ready to lead? He has overseen NOTHING.

Bringin up Palin's husband's DUI from 22 years ago is sexist – why not investigate Obama's admitted cocaine use?

I voted for Hillary Clinton because SHE was qualified and experienced and could get the job done.

But when the Democrats decided to "crown" King Obama at the top of the ticket – that was when I made up my mind to support the More Qualified, Experienced Candidate – John McCain. The fact that he chose Sarah Palin as his running mate is simply icing on the cake for me.

Modern   September 3rd, 2008 2:00 pm ET

Your comment is awaiting moderation.

This is how the media vets political figures. It is silly that the repubs are appauled now. This was done to Obama. This was done to Hillary. It hasn't been done to McCain, because he is always offended when anyone asks tough questions. Unfortunately, this is what happens and they should get over it. I say, we need to know all we can about this unknown governor. She maybe a great leader, I just don't know it yet. So media and everyone else, please keep digging! THANK YOU!

Please Post CNN. This is a valid and fair comment.

DBubla   September 3rd, 2008 2:00 pm ET

Stop the nonsense: I want to know: What makes Gov Paley more qualified than Senator Hutchinson, or any other mainstream Republican? What did she do to impact America on a large scale? Someone please tell me & stop the BS. We know when we are being drug along on the McCain Plane... or is she nothing more than eyecandy for McCain and the Rpublican Party as a right-wing potential Hillary replacement? I guess the Repubs now feel like there is no difference between not sacking a ho getting knocked up by a soccer babydaddy while mama-wanna be VP is in the front seat playing soccer mom and a Repub in the bathroom with a wide stance. why was one sacked and the other is being toted as family values? Lots of probs in that family: daddy of VP pick is an alcoholic, and mom has a kid with genetic issues, while little girl has a problem crossing her legs, coupled by Mama-VP pick who abuses power while in office.

Duane G   September 3rd, 2008 2:00 pm ET

This is the media's job. Sarah Palin is not known by 99.9% of Americans. Who else is going to vet her publicly for us, the Republicans?? I don't think so.

Barbara   September 3rd, 2008 2:00 pm ET

Barbara September 3rd, 2008 1:52 pm ET
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
I believe Palin was brought in (with her family) to be a distraction from US Citizen's issues.

Notice the real issues have fallen by the wayside? We're being played by the Rovian/Limbaugh play-book.

No more wars.

Censoring an AMERICAN again rebecca? You do it every time.

pauline   September 3rd, 2008 2:00 pm ET

McCain is causing Pain (palin) to Americans.
McStupid has stupid judgement.
POW card and pathetic female card.
Talk about sexism.
When so many qualified people, he picks the least qualified.
McShame & McPain.

leon levin   September 3rd, 2008 2:00 pm ET

Isn't this the Steve Schmidt that started the "swift boating" gang in '04 ?What else can people expect from the scumbag.
I guess her journalism degree qualifies her to be the Repub VP. That's about the average education of most Repubs.

Nick   September 3rd, 2008 2:00 pm ET

So long as you're complaining about the unfair attacks on your candidate, then following it up with "...with a record of accomplishment that exceeds, by far, the governing accomplishments of Senator Obama," I guess it would be completely ridiculous that people would question her.

But seriously now. Republicans need to stop acting like victims here. People have every right to question who's going to lead them at this crucial time, especially if it may be someone from the same party that got us into this mess.

RyanD.   September 3rd, 2008 2:00 pm ET

Only in Republican America can the black candidate who knows and understands scripture front to back and has a fully functional and scandal-free family, a strong, educated wife and 2 well behaved, smart kids along with a VP who lost immediate family in a tragedy and has military sons be considered "not of their values" while the white self-admitted philandering divorcee who cheated on his disfigured ex for months before settling on a woman 20 years his junior and the 44 year old mom of a pregnant 17 year old who lied directly to America during her first press conference be considered the "moral elite".

Hypocrisy.

Terri   September 3rd, 2008 2:00 pm ET

Palin has been critical of Hilary Clinton, calling her charges of "sexist" news coverage - whining.

"When I hear a statement like that coming from a woman candidate with any kind of perceived whine about the excess criticism or maybe a sharper microscope put on her, I think, man, that doesn't do us any good," Palin told Newsweek magazine in March.

Isn't it interesting when the tables are turned, it's suddenly unfair. Who's whing now.

Typical Republican hypocrisy.

Shari, NY   September 3rd, 2008 2:00 pm ET

Mother Nature is not the only one raining on their parade. Instead of having a grand old party they have to be spending time bashing Obama and defending Palin in one gasp. No time for the issues affecting us. NO SIR!

Legally Lex   September 3rd, 2008 1:59 pm ET

After reading a few comments and how they were worded, it is sad that many of you sound uneducated and will grasp at anything to make you feel better about your decision.

How about listening to all the parties and making an "informed" decision as to who you will vote for in the upcoming election. The media sickens me with their bashing. (I do mean bashing on both sides). Stop listening to commercials and actually listen to what each candidate has to say!

Let us prove we are adults and stop "bashing" children and family. It amazes me that we wonder "why" people have become blasphemous and violent. Let us just look to the media coverage of politicians and you have a start!

Brian   September 3rd, 2008 1:59 pm ET

Chip,

I'm not a Republican but I also knew Palin was a candidate for months. And every time she was mentioned, the idea was labeled a long shot because she has too much baggage. It's not the media's fault she is a phony and a liar. She might be a good mother, but she is a dirty politician obsessed with power. Her track record shows it. I applaud the media for letting the public know. And I hoep the rest of her skeltons are out in public soon enough, and believe me there are many.

Jonathan   September 3rd, 2008 1:59 pm ET

What the Dems need is for Hillary to come out fighting for Obama. She needs to go on live television or on the record somewhere and challenge Palin to stop invoking her name and start living on her own experience and knowledge! Let's see how well Palin does when she stops trying to liken herself to Hillary. Also, Palin is a pcik for Vice President, and actually has a chance at becoming President sometime before McCain's term would be over. Sorry to say it, but he really could die. Just because his mom is 96 years old doesn't mean he'll make it that far, especially not with his medical history. I think it's funny also that the Republicans are trying to argue sexism when they were the ones leading the charge against Hillary during the primaries. This do as i say and not as I do mentality has got to stop. It's not sexist nor offensive to ask real questions about someone that has put themselves in this position. Sarah Palin, if you can't stand the heat then get out of the kitchen....and for God's sake, you are not, never have been, and never will be Hillary Clinton so quit using her name and get along on YOURS!

Kat   September 3rd, 2008 1:59 pm ET

I find it infuriating that he's playing up the woman card so much. People aren't stupid, it doesn't matter whether she is female or not, she is tremendously underqualified, ran her small town into $20 million of debt, has hypocritical social policy stances (even though she is staunchly pro-life, she slashed funding to a charity which houses teenage mothers while she was governor), and has troublesomely evangelical stances to a government which, by constitution, demands a separation of church and state. It has nothing to do with her being female, and everything to do with her incompetence when it is highly likely that McCain could die, leaving the VP in charge of the country. I don't care about Bristol, she can do what she wants, but the country is in a time of crisis right now, and we need someone with good policies, not a figurehead who has proven several times over in the past that she is terrible with economical issues and leading.

Tjaye in LA   September 3rd, 2008 1:59 pm ET

How is her experience not relevant since she is very close to being our next President? And how do they say SHE has International experience, because Alaska is the closest state to Russia, but Obama's travels around the world mean nothing? And if not running a budget disqualifies Obama, doesn't it also disqualify McCain?

The hypocracy that comes from the Red Right is ridiculously insulting, to say the very least.

dude   September 3rd, 2008 1:59 pm ET

The media leftist bias is readily apparent. Look how eagerly they are trying to find anything about Palin. Look how they ignored the story on John Edwards when it was staring them in the face for months.

Sacto Joe   September 3rd, 2008 1:59 pm ET

Faux my behind! This person should NEVER have been put up for President. The baggage is substatial, even if you leave out the radical nature of her political and religious life.

She believes that the Iraq war is God's war!

That's all we need to really sink this country – a HOLY WAR!

Breck   September 3rd, 2008 1:59 pm ET

Pretty much, the media is finally turning on them.

People make no sense   September 3rd, 2008 1:59 pm ET

Iowa and proud if it – I see your post is filled with great ideas. Your convention is filled with great ideas as well. Please enlighten us with facts.

B E in TN   September 3rd, 2008 1:59 pm ET

Sarah Palin qualifications have little or NOTHING to do with why McCain selected this person he barely knows. Furthermore, I trust American women to have the good sense to realize they have been insulted by this choice. She was selected for two reasons and two reason only, to wit: 1. McCain is hoping to attract female votes and perhaps a few disgruntled Hillary supporters; 2. He desperately needs the far right evilgelical votes and she is extreme far right including anti-abortion, even for rape and incest. He is committed to overturning roe v. wade and Sarah and one more supreme court appointment will do it. I would hope that American women who wish to have control over their own bodies will give serious consideration to the potential consequences of this pairing when they step into the voting booth. I think it is long past time to stop the discussion of her down syndrome child and pregnant daughter. If you do not believe in abortion then don't have one. This is the choice Sarah made for herself and apparently she made the same choice for her daughter but do not forget: SHE HAD A CHOICE!!!!!!!

PanamaSooner   September 3rd, 2008 1:59 pm ET

This entire episode has turned the Republican Party into a bigger joke than before. How can these people stand in front of thousands and a TV audience and say she is qualified? Blows my mind!

Obama 2008

Simon   September 3rd, 2008 1:59 pm ET

Experience is highly overated. Bush has been President for 8 years and he isn't qualified to be a dog catcher. Cheney and Rumsfeld had decades of high level experience between them but made the worst strategic blunder in US history. McCain has lots of Senatorial experience but he has been on the wrong side of every issue.

Life experience, character and wisdom are more important. Obama has tons of that.

Kennedy anyone? Lincoln?

Mark   September 3rd, 2008 1:58 pm ET

The McCain campaign continues to deny that they chose Palin simply to attract women voters. So why then do all of their statements in defense of her seem to be trying to play on the sexism theme? Using the term "old boy's network" surely is designed to remind women of the discrimination many of them have probably experienced in their lives. The ironic thing is that Palin called Hillary a "whiner" when Hillary complained about sexism in the media... This is just more of the two-faced McCain Palin ticket. It is already well documented how McCain has reversed his positions on a host of issues in order to attract the republican base. Palin has done the same. She voted for the "bridge to nowhere" until she realized she might be under national scrutiny, then decided she was against it. She claims to be against earmarks and overblown spending, yet she retained a federal lobbyist to lobby for millions in earmarks for her community when she was the mayor of Wasilla. At least McCain and Palin have one thing in common: They are both two-faced panderers.

smei   September 3rd, 2008 1:58 pm ET

People that believe that Sarah Palin is being "abused" are crazy....if you can't handle the scrutiny get out of the race. For the McCain campaign to think that she should be expempt from this is outrageous. She could some day be the President. Toughen up McCain supporters, and quit trying to come up with lame excuses to cover up the concerns about your candidate.

Sharon   September 3rd, 2008 1:58 pm ET

John McCain chose his Vice President. And Sarah Palin does have some political baggage. Male or female she is fair game. I am a female. I would be offended as a woman if I received special treatment because I am a woman. I support my rights, and the rights of my male coworkers as well. I have been subjected to gender bias, I know what it feels like. Woman support equally among men and women. Women do not want to be accused of reverse gender bias. Women respect men and their right. Women support all men and woman rights equally.

As a professional woman I am insulted John McCain Campaign is using gender bias when no gender bias statements are made.

Sarah Palin last spring during TV interview call Hilary Clinton a "whiner." As a woman I am insulted because Sarah Palin is now using gender bias all the time. John McCain claims "gender bias" for anything and everything. Sarah Palin you are not who you claim to be!!! John MCain you are insulting all women and harming all the progress women have made!! Sarah Palin you are not helping!! You are hurting women causes!!

I have researched Sarah Palin and I do see "red alarms." John McCain chose her. Sarah Palin is free game. As a woman I would welcome the questions and would expect no different.

Really Palin Who?? Women for Obama   September 3rd, 2008 1:58 pm ET

The McCain campaign is trying to distract voters from the real issues - so we're going to focus on what they're trying to hide.

They've come out against the life-saving possibilities of stem cell research.

They don't even mention protecting equal pay for equal work.

They support huge tax cuts for the wealthiest 2% of Americans.

They've almost completely ignored the $10 billion we're spending every week in Iraq.

And they make zero exceptions for a woman's right to choose - even in cases of rape, incest, or to protect the life of the mother.

dallas Mike   September 3rd, 2008 1:58 pm ET

The McCain campaign made FOOLS of themselves by canceling an apperance by JM because CNN asked a legitimate question they couldn't answer.
When asked what decisions had been made by Caribou Barbie concerning the Alaska National guard...they first tried to change the subject (typical for Republicans) and then just avoided the question all together.
Turns out...she had in fact activated the Guard to battle wild fires.
A missed oppurtunity to lend some credabilty to JM's choice of VP and they blew it!!!

And then tried to blame CNN. (another hallmark tactic of Republicans in general)

Note to the McCain Campaign: This kind of stuff is why you won't receive a vote from me.

Ex-Republican for Obama   September 3rd, 2008 1:58 pm ET

@Frank in Deerfield, IL September 3rd, 2008 12:21 pm ET

I'm thinking you are dead on, and at some point they will withdraw her and place one of the other top men on the ticket. Remember the tactic and then decide if it was all blatant publicity and taking the american citizen for granted if/when it happens.

I think the selection of Palin is a horrid mistake, and believe it or not, I won't say I think the republicans are even stupid enough to have her on the ticket. I see a slimey underhanded move to pull her and replace her somewhere when the election is closing in on voting time.

Just remember, if it happens, it has to be obvious that either McCain is a moron, or the GOP will ALWAYS use and abuse the citizens, fooling them for their own benefit!

Oren   September 3rd, 2008 1:58 pm ET

To Never Again.

Yes, indeed, never vote for a winner again. Sounds absolutely wonderful to me.

Bill   September 3rd, 2008 1:58 pm ET

Its 3am and a phone is ringing in the White House – who's gonna answer it?

Not Sarah Palin – she will be out moose hunting!!!!

To say this lady is qualified and has been vetted for 6 months is a joke – who in their right minds would select such a person, with all the baggage she apparently has, above many other better qualified candidates.

This was done as a knee-jerk reaction when the republican party refused to agree to Lieberman or Palenty. Says an awful lot about McCain's judgement.

Just think for a minute about what damage they could both do if allowed to run this great country.......

Ryan McGhee   September 3rd, 2008 1:58 pm ET

one thing important to remember to both republicans and democrats is that Obama was popular enough to win his parties support. Palin has had no such scrutiny

Jon   September 3rd, 2008 1:58 pm ET

This woman is not qualified to be vice president of the United States. Anyone who says otherwise, John McCain and his bald adviser included, has a serious judgment problem and shouldn't hold a position of power in government.

SC   September 3rd, 2008 1:57 pm ET

Obama supporters, stop whinning. One senses that you're all on the defensive side; and it's not smart. Get with the program. McCain/Palin '08.

John Smith   September 3rd, 2008 1:57 pm ET

I echo what was said by a brilliant observer:

"With a record of accomplishment that exceeds, by far, the governing accomplishments of Senator Obama"

Obama:
B.A in political science from Columbia University, with a specialization in international relations
J.D. in Law from Hardvard, graduated magna cum laude; President of the Harvard Law Review
12 years (92-04) teaching constitutional law
7 years State Senator: sponsored more than 800 bills
4 years Senator for Illinos, a state with 12.8 million people

Palin:
Bachelor's in journalism from University of Idaho
4 years Wasilla City Council (8000 people)
6 years Wasilla mayor (8000 people)
1 year "Ethics Commissioner of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission"
20 months governor of a state with 660,000 people

Do they really think we're THAT stupid?

People make no sense   September 3rd, 2008 1:57 pm ET

Voted for Hillary, Smalltown, NC – how is a war hero someone that spent his whole military career captured? Is he going to talk to our brave soldiers and tell them how to turn when being tortured. Will that be his great military strategy? He is pathetic. He didn't fight for me or my interest. Do you know the reason why we fought in Vietnam? Probaby not. My grandfather was in the marines and my great grandfather is in politics. My grandfather is a war hero. Not some captured military man who was too dumb to know how to fly his plane to out manuever himself from being shot down.

Your post doesn't make sense – you spew vote for Hillary but her policy issues are much different from McCain. Please explain what policies does McCain support that Clinton supports?

Mel   September 3rd, 2008 1:57 pm ET

Its not over yet from what I hear. Wait till th other shoe drops. Stay tuned.

OBAMA....08

Sindy   September 3rd, 2008 1:57 pm ET

The RNC plays well the offended card, is all theatrics. Now they are on fire over Campbell brown over the interview. She did nothing wrong. A journalist finally doing her job. Cable news is not a magazine with nice pictures in it. You need to challenge the spin. But I feel that the bullies always get to intimidate and finally journalist will tone it down. All the sudden we should know and love Pailin, after months of hearing that we cannot vote for Barack because we do not know enough about him.

shameless   September 3rd, 2008 1:56 pm ET

The author of this article should be ashamed. What terribly biased reporting. The McCain campaign "spent the summer" complaining about media coverage. What a misleading statement, which makes the author's personal views all too obvious.

Jeffrey   September 3rd, 2008 1:56 pm ET

C'mon, we're Americans. We'd trash ANY candidate, man, woman, or Martian that carried more baggage than experience.

rightytighty   September 3rd, 2008 1:56 pm ET

Of course they do...

Palin has more executive experience than their messiah and.., she's hot!! Progressive liberals are running scared and it's showing in their hate filled rhetoric...

Small Town Politician   September 3rd, 2008 1:56 pm ET

Alaska has less than 700,000 residents. Illinois has over 12.5 million. Chicago by itself has more than 2.5 million. Palin's longest tenured job was mayor of a city with less than 9,000 residents. Palin has never dealt with a comparable and competitive number of people to be prepared to possibly be the President. We have already witnessed Palin being unknowledgeable in how the media will scrutinize you and your entire family once you run for national office. When she speaks, it sounds like she is in a PTA meeting with about 100 folks. There is no way she is ready to run this country.

Darrel from Denver   September 3rd, 2008 1:56 pm ET

Politics is a tough game......sound familiar? It's what the republican machine used when leveraging the media to slam Obama the past year and more.

Get over it. Quit whining. If you can't take the heat, don't run.

Repubs don't like it when you question them. Bunch of cry babies.

What is good for the goose s good for the gander!

VeryAngryVoter   September 3rd, 2008 1:56 pm ET

This is the most outrageous example yet of media bias and liberal nastiness towards conservatives. Why don't we talk about Chelsea Clinton or Biden's kids as well? Biden's daughter was arrested for obstructing an officer at a bar and has a drinking problem. Biden's son was arrested for DWI. Should we start investigating all the candidates children now? Disgusting! Oh, Arnold Schwarzeneggar has four children, should he be a governer?

Mark   September 3rd, 2008 1:56 pm ET

Where McCain could have shown one of his greatest strengths only shows his greatest weakness. leadership

RB from NH   September 3rd, 2008 1:56 pm ET

The repubs can give it but not take it.

Unempressed   September 3rd, 2008 1:56 pm ET

Scary how McCain likes to make "quick" and "gut" decisions over thought out ones – I can't live with that. (no wonder he did terrible in school)

If she were "fit" to lead a country of 300 million, there'd be far less problems.

Besides, I thought republicans were "excited/energized" about this pick? If that's true, then what's the problem?

Help the Polar Bear   September 3rd, 2008 1:56 pm ET

Why hasn't it been more widely mentioned that Palin is also trying to have the polar bear taken off the "threatened species" list in order to continue drilling for oil on the North Slope? ABC News recently reported that Palin "sued the Bush Administration in federal court recently, charging it was too accepting of climate change studies which overstated the phenomenon's impact on polar bears. The result, she argued, would be a negative impact on her state's businesses, including oil and gas extraction." It also goes on to state that "Palin has led her state's efforts to block protections for the world's estimated 25,000 polar bears, of which roughly a fifth are believed to reside in Alaska" saying that it "will deter activities such as commercial fisheries, oil and gas exploration and development, transportation, and tourism". I think people should really consider who they want to run the country. We need to vote for our own pocketbook, not theirs.

KB   September 3rd, 2008 1:56 pm ET

Edward R. Murrow is rolling over in his grave right now, seeing what has become of American journalism.
One can not tell the difference between TMZ and CNN.

Dennis from Co.   September 3rd, 2008 1:55 pm ET

This is a joke. Ok so how is this different from the last 8 years. The person believes we should outlaw abortion entirely regardless of the circumstance, doesn't believe in global warming, wants creationism taught in public school, has 0 international experience, no real economic experience, doesn't believe in sex education, and on and on and on. You have got to be kidding me.

I certainly want a hockey mom who can fire an M16 on automatic to lead our country. Mcain could have picked any number of qualified running mates. Wow what does this choice say about the decision making of Macain. Here is one vote in this swing state that will go for Obama.

Oh yeah did I say my 50 year old wife was completely insulted by the choice. Whhops one more vote Mcain just lost in Colorado.

VRM   September 3rd, 2008 1:55 pm ET

"The liberals have such arrogance to think that because THEY did not know Sarah Palin, that she came from nowhere and was not "properly" vetted. I'm just a dude who reads the news and even I knew about Sarah Palin being on the list of possible VPs for months! And she was one of my favorites! Perhaps I just pay attention."

Uhmm....71% of the population never heard of this woman before her pick as VP according to the most recent gallup polls.

Wendy in CA   September 3rd, 2008 1:55 pm ET

Guess that the nasty side of McCain he has been long rumored to have...is starting to rear its ugly head. hahaHAHA

Danny   September 3rd, 2008 1:55 pm ET

She was an AIP member, there is video evidence. She fired people as mayor because they didn't sponsor her bid for mayor. She tried to have books banned. She was a director of Sen. Steven's 527 election group. She dragged her poor child out into the open KNOWING a frenzy would follow. All of this is proven and shows McCain's lack of judgment. There is no conspiracy its fact, time to own up, oh yeah these are republicans.

Marge   September 3rd, 2008 1:55 pm ET

McLIAR needa to be happy the media IS not asking him why he left his first family...
The reason the 'media" is questioning Ms.Sarah about her commitment to her children is because those were the frist words out of her and McLIAR'S mouth!!! "she's the "mother" of 5"!!!
She has a special needs child, and a pregnant teen-ager,seems that she has more pressing issues than running for VP of the United States of America. A heart beat away from the President...which if elected is a 72 year old man.I just hope when she speaks tonight,she doesn't sound like a Barbie doll.
OMG...wonder how boring McBush's acceptance speech is going to be???? LOL!LOL!LOL!

Sharon Kitchen   September 3rd, 2008 1:55 pm ET

What the McShame camp calls,"nonsense" is far from over. It has just begun. Media spot light on. Roll tape. Play back all tape. Everyone be Very careful .......wooops........stuff is already on tape and in the news. The investigation has started......keep tuned in for the next chapter.

Terrence (Winston Salem, NC)   September 3rd, 2008 1:55 pm ET

You can't shut us up. You opened the door on the "experience" flack when McCain said that the number one job of the VP is that he/she can step in and be President on Day One.

It's not clear to America that she can. We don't know her. You can't compare her to Obama with whom America has been exposed to for over a year and a half. If Obama's still considered "new" by your standards, then she is "definitely green".

McCain Got It Wrong   September 3rd, 2008 1:55 pm ET

**

John's campaign sound like a bunch of WHINERS>>!!

Ok, Pick up Your Barbie and GO HOME...

John forgot to say faux media coverage and I'm A POW...!!!

John did NOT vett her and JUDGMENT is the name of the game..!!

You didn't do yuor home work for the second most important job.. !!

NO VETTING was done..!!

**

Obama/Bidne, 2008/2012

EyesWideOpen   September 3rd, 2008 1:55 pm ET

CONGRATULATIONS to the Republican party! They have successfully distracted the American media to focus on Governor Palin and her "abilities and qualifications" rather than that of Senator McCain. VERY VERY successful indeed. So, while everyone's talking about "moms working, tenn pregancy, etc." NO ONE is talking about John McCain and his similarities to Bush and his lack of connectedness with the struggles of average Americans.

Great Job, Once again, for being the party that has mastered the art of "red herrings"

Military Girl   September 3rd, 2008 1:55 pm ET

This is "SmokeScreeGate" there must be more about Sarah and let's not forget about Todd, who receives copies of state business emails!

Wow   September 3rd, 2008 1:54 pm ET

Ugggh, Schmidt and these people that continually pull out 'sexism' like a card up their sleeve at any time you don't agree with a female politician on her beliefs, background, or stance on issues is making me nauseous.

Everyone questioning her experience/background and McCain's quick pick of her as a running mate have a complete right to do so. I'm sorry, I think someone with a law degree from one of the best universities in the world, and has devoted his professional career to roles in law, politics, and the community of a predominant city in this country does have more background for a high level political position then someone with a bachelors in journalism and who ran what was practically a bait/hunting shop for the first decade plus of her professional life after college. That's nothing more then common sense.

Who also picks someone to be their running mate who is in the middle of an investigation for abuse of power at that time. This is not something she can cover up, that's in her past. There's a complete possibility she could be indicted for this and loose her current position and she's only had it for 19 months. What the heck is that?? Am I taking crazy pills her people? That's just plain stupid.....not maverick....stupid.

What happened to this country and it's politicians (ALL of them) that don't stand for democracy anymore but their own personal ideals, pandering to the public when they need it, but never putting their money where their mouth is (accountability for their promises, speeches, and what they 'say' they believe in), and spinning everything out of control instead of actually taking some responsibility by being truthful about what they said/did (everything that they seem to say or do, is not what they meant because the media and public are not viewing it correctly)???? This all is getting pretty sickening.

Colleen   September 3rd, 2008 1:54 pm ET

you republicans blew this one big time...

CitizenS   September 3rd, 2008 1:54 pm ET

Well, this is just a cover so his crony, VP Cheney can quietly go to Russia's neighbors and talk with the international oil execs to secure his future compensation. All the while inciting Russia into a cold war stance. Unbelievable! WAKE UP voters, this is being done to instigate more military situations before the elections to enhance the fact that McCain spent most of his war time locked in a cell (which we are grateful for). But now he is out and wants to be your President that leads you valiantly to WAR. OMG....please look under your nose to see what the Repubs are up to. What is VP Cheney doing in Europe (giving away $1 billion we do not have) while we have major DOMESTIC economic issues here. Want more of the same for McCain!

Steve - southern Illinois   September 3rd, 2008 1:54 pm ET

John McCain suffered as a P.O.W. He served this country honorably. Nobody is trying to dispute that. Barack Obama and almost every other leading Democrat I've heard say great things about McCain when it comes to that.

But McCain also has a rebellious nature and is quick to lose his temper. That sounds exactly like George Bush to me. We can't afford four more years of a 'maverick.' Do you want our next president throwing a hissy fit every other day like McCain's doing now with CNN?

JB   September 3rd, 2008 1:54 pm ET

I wonder if anyone thinks Obama should wait until his kids are grown to run for President? He should be there to guide his girls as they grow up. There is such a double standard in this country. If Tim Palin were on the ticket, instead of Sarah, this wouldn't even be an issue. The Dems need to stop pretending to be thinking of the kids and just come out and say they don't want a woman to be in the White House. They blackballed Hillary and now they are trying to do the same to Palin.

Dr. Don   September 3rd, 2008 1:54 pm ET

Why was Campbell Brown released (fired?) from her position with NBC? An answer may be found in the unprofessional way she badgered the McCain/Palin staff worker. Did she honestly think he had Palin's appointment calendar with him, or the list of documents Palin has signed as Governor of Alaska? This line of questioning is a joke. Then to later reluctantly admit that investigation revealed that Palin had indeed made decisions regarding the Guard shows the shallowness of the interview. Get a life.

Matt, Delaware   September 3rd, 2008 1:54 pm ET

A Mayor and Governor must take a stance on everything that comes before them. Senators have the luxury of being able to vote "Present" or just vote with their party again and again.
Since we need so much experience to run for political office, does this mean that politics is closed to the average American?
One of the premises on which this country was built was that "anyone" could run for political office. The call for "experience" is a trademark of those already in the club. The old major news networks have nothing to offer as far as unbiased news. Average Americans will rise up and join together and say enough is enough.

Kellie   September 3rd, 2008 1:54 pm ET

I've heard from some repubs that there is not way Joe Biden will be able to go after her in the debates because he will look like a bully. THAT'S sexism to me.

Why do the McCain supporters have such thick skulls?
This is not about Sarah Palin and this is not about Barack Obama. This is about John McCain.
This is about John McCain trying to scare the country into voting for him because he says we are living in dangerous times. This is about McCain, acknowledging his age, admitted he would pick a VP who was ready to PROTECT us on day one. If Sarah Palin were a man would she have been selected…NO! THAT is sexism. McCain is a liar with bad judgment and this New Hampshire Republican wants nothing to do with him.

tdub   September 3rd, 2008 1:54 pm ET

All of this pushback by McCain is calculated. It is about as much a "media scandal "as his protestations that Obama is a "celebrity". Palin deserves as much scrutiny as any candidate, especially one who is actually qualified to hold the second biggest office in the world, espcially if it's with an older man with 5 bouts with cancer, ya think?

We have seen all of this Rove-style stuff before. Attempt to intimidate the media into parroting Republican talking points. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

Brina   September 3rd, 2008 1:54 pm ET

McCain was just grinning last week trying to step on Obama's day......he was DETERMINED to get the media attention, now let's see if he can handle it....

Lisa - Florida   September 3rd, 2008 1:54 pm ET

Excuse me...just watching the RNC convention delegates vs. the DNC convention delegates is all voters need to see. We don't even need to hear the b.s. speeches. Nothing but a sea of elderly folks in their stupid hats and sunday-go-to-meeting suits. You think these people really care about the future (i.e., medicare, healthcare, the draft and another war) they'll all be dead by 2012. The youth of this country is the future and Obama/Biden are the leaders to take us there and most of the country know it!!! McCain is a political panderer (Lieberman is his best friend, don't forget) and Palin is very, very scary with her right wing evangelical, we are the chosen few, policies. Everyone needs to watch her speaking at her Christian, Pentacostal church. Video is on Huffington Post. Very scary. The media is doing their job and needs to keep doing it. They also need to bring out McCain's history of corruption, i.e., Keating Five. The reason Bush has served 2 terms is because these are the "sheep" who put him there. NOT THIS TIME!!!

Obama/Biden '08

JJ   September 3rd, 2008 1:54 pm ET

This is how the republicans and right wingers operate. They accuse the media ("liberal") of bias in the hope the media will stop reporting the facts. Unfortunately this tactic has worked in the past. I hope the media will continue to do it's job. The public is entitled to know about the candidates. The controversial minister at Obama's former church was fair game and so is the life of Palin. We don't always like what we find out, but it is the media's job to present it.

Marsha   September 3rd, 2008 1:54 pm ET

Calm down, people. "Obama the Communist?" Why would anyone take what you have to say seriously when you make statements like that? Please. In the global scheme of things, 21st century American liberals and conservatives are all pretty liberal.

Quickly: Palin is a woman, I'll give you that. But she's a woman who got a journalism degree and has held a significant office for less time than McCain has been running for president. Michelle Obama is more qualified than Palin to run the country. She's anti-abortion, anti-gay, her pastor is anti-semetic, she is anti-birth control, and her son trafficked cocaine. She's not even qualified to be the executive of her own family.

McCain is throwing the election.

kaydeedee   September 3rd, 2008 1:54 pm ET

What hogwash. Of course no one is "out to destroy Sarah Palin." The GOP spokespersons act as if she should be immune from criticism because she's female, and that no one should be looking into her past actions. As if she and the Republican Party didn't know that comes with the territority of being the VP nominee of this country?... This is a tired old strategy long used by the GOP, which unfortunately works on plenty of uninformed voters. Palin is fair game, as she should be. And, while I agree with Sen. Obama that her daughter should not be criticized, I think it's fair to form an opinion of Gov. Palin for choosing her own ambition over protecting her daughter. And it's not a flattering opinion. I would also think less of the candidate's "family values" because of that choice if it were Mister Palin.

The BOTTOM Line......   September 3rd, 2008 1:54 pm ET

IF YOU THINK ITS BAD NOW....WAIT TIL MAINSTREAM POPS OPEN BRISTOLS UNDERAGE DRINKING SCANDAL.....TSK, TSK....JUST GOOGLE IT....YOU'LL SEE ALLLLLL THE PICS

Sarah Bell, Cleveland OH   September 3rd, 2008 1:54 pm ET

How dare the McCain campaign belittle the accomplishments of Senator Barack Obama. This is just a Republican scandal to destroy the first black presidential nominee. It's racist to question Obama's experience. And what flat out bigotry to raise questions about Obama's business dealings, political affiliations and his bipartisan record. Racist! Racist racist racist. (See how this works everyone?) You are witnessing the key piece of the Palin package. Use a woman to paint the entire media as sexist in the hopes that woman will be dumb enough not to see through this obvious pandering. Rallying your party base might have worked. Grabbing PUMA's ten members probably worked. But this will not work. Eat your own mooseburgers GOP. Cause I've had ENOUGH!! Anyone but McCain '08!

Theresa-IL   September 3rd, 2008 1:54 pm ET

For all those critical of Campbell Brown-she did her job. It is her job to ask the McCain campaign to put their money where there mouth is. If, as there say, Gov. Palin has so much more experience as commander-in-chief of the Alaskan National Guard, then provide us with one decision that shows that!
The real disgrace-they couldn't. Of all the tremendous Republican women to choose from (Kay Bailey Hutchinson, Christine Todd Whitman to name a few.. this is who he picks). If I were a Republican, I would be more offended.

Stella   September 3rd, 2008 1:54 pm ET

I think it's amazing that now the right wing, moral values, republicans now think unwed teen pregancy is perfectly okay. What a double standard! If this was Obama's daughter or one of Biden's grandchildren we'd never hear the end of it from the McCain camp. It would be attack, attack, and more attacks. That's what we'd get if this was Obama's daughter. And it was perfectly okay for the McCain campaign to attack Obama at every turn yet no one is supposed to say anything about this unknown VP pick. Go ahead media, vet her. This woman would be one heart beat away from being the President of the U.S. I want to know what her qualifications are other than being a mayor of a small Alaskan town and govenor of Alaska (which is sparsely populated) for 18 months. Post this CNN.

Erik   September 3rd, 2008 1:52 pm ET

All the righteous indignation and spin from the GOP won't change the sad truth. She was a poor choice for Vice-President. Period.

REPUBLICAN CITIZEN OF UNITED STATES   September 3rd, 2008 1:52 pm ET

LOOKS LIKE TO ME THAT THE DEMOCRATS HAVE THE NERVE TO SAY THAT ALL THE REPUBLICANS TALK ABOUT HILLARY, WELL TIME ABOUT IS FAIR PLAY. NOT SAYING THAT TWO WRONGS MAKE A RIGHT BUT JUST TO PROVE A POINT, THE REPUBLICANS ARE JUST GETTING THEIR FACTS CORRECT AND THEIR RIGHTS TO LET PEOPLE KNOW THE TRUTH. I AM CERTAIN HILLARY IS NO PRIZE PACKAGE TO TALK ABOUT. HER NAME IS NEVER BROUGHT UP IN MY HOUSEHOLD AS WE HAVE BETTER THINGS TO TALK ABOUT. THANK YOU.

Sexist   September 3rd, 2008 1:51 pm ET

To the "Smart. i.e., sexist Voter" "I thought it was interesting that the theme of the RNC was "country first" because I think your family should come first. Palin has a newly special needs baby and now her teenage daughter is pregnant, is it really the best time to run for VP? She should take care of her home first!"

Obama has two young daughters - why isn't he thinking about THEM? He should stop running immediately, return home, shuffle them from day care to soccer and remember that FAMILY COMES FIRST.

I love the sexism. The more we hear it, the more we think Palin rocks!

Beatriz Perez-Sanchez   September 3rd, 2008 1:51 pm ET

Palin was the best choice that McCain could have made – for the Democrats! She is such a liability to the Republicans that, should she remain on the ticket, she will help to breathe new life into Obama's campaign. Originally, I though that this would be a horse race. Now that McCain has selected a horse's posterior as his running-mate, the race is virtually over.

Peter, South TX   September 3rd, 2008 1:51 pm ET

What does it say about a presidential candidate when he choses his VP candidate after meeting them ONE TIME??? This is the same type of logic that had Bush saying of Putin, " I've looked the man in the eye. I found him to be very straightforward and trustworthy."

McBush? No thanks.

doubting republican, mississippi   September 3rd, 2008 1:51 pm ET

Palin,

you're being used and abused by the ol boys of GOP.

you'll never get respect or get heard,

even if you have any good ideas to hear, which is unlikely.

go back and take care of your baby that you brought to this world.

Joe   September 3rd, 2008 1:51 pm ET

Please what a joke. Even when asked McCains Aide couldn't even list Not Hillary's record in the national guard. We have every right to put her under a microscope if she wants to be second in command of this great country. It all comes down to is does she have the right judgment to run this country and so far she hasn't won me over.

Johnny Reason   September 3rd, 2008 1:51 pm ET

Grow up Republicans and stop your whining....The RNC had no problem calling Obama unpatriotic and unchristian (Obama's a muslim remember) both absolutely unsupported and false but the "liberal" media can't point out the obvious, substantial and substantiated flaws in Ms. Palin? Oh yeah and how about the Swift boats – wasn't that the granddaddy of all faux media scandels concocted by none other than a conservative media/journalist working to "uncover the truth" haha of John Kerry?

Though this may be a frenzy. it is certainly not faux and is certainly not filled with lies and false accusations such as the RNC is flagrantly guilty of in this and past elections.

Palin should go home and take care of her kids. Give me a break.
RNC whiners.

c6Logic   September 3rd, 2008 1:51 pm ET

They attack Obama for his minister, they attack his wife–and yet, asking legitimate questions about the track record of someone in line to become the POTUS during a time of two wars is a media witch hunt?!?!?!

These Republicans put me off my feed. No principle but hypocrisy.

Maria   September 3rd, 2008 1:51 pm ET

My question is this. How can she be an effective vice president of the U.S.A. and be pregnant. It is only a matter of time. Her husband and she do not use birth control and she is still at an age where she could get pregnant. How pretty will that be? McCain has made the poorest choice ever for someone to be a heartbeat away from becoming our President.

Iowa and proud if it   September 3rd, 2008 1:51 pm ET

As usual.... all the dims can do is bash this and bash that. No substance, just blogs. No facts, just whining. No solutions, just speeches. No idea, just ignorance. No Bama, just fine for America.

Selena   September 3rd, 2008 1:51 pm ET

I think it was your campaign to put her out there as Veep, so deal with it! These cries of 'sexism' are absolutely absurd. She is mother and should be able to deal or answer 'mother' questions. I think it is more sexist that your campaign is hiding her from reporters and media and answering questions for her. Can a woman not think for herself or answer questions for herself in 2008? Then can be candidates for Veep and President. Hillary would never hang out behind the curtains.

This is exactly your strategy in picking Palin. Haven't you noticed the media talking more about her then the real issues of the same with 'McCain'. You should be thankful.

Toni   September 3rd, 2008 1:51 pm ET

List of possible VP'S????

She wasnt even on the short list@ the poster above

Andrea from NYC   September 3rd, 2008 1:51 pm ET

just because McCain is picking a woman as his VP doesn't mean that women that supported Hillary will vote for him...nobody buy it...
Republicans keep saying that she has experience in foreign politics and she can be a good commander in chief...they really think that people are so stupid?

McCain may have more experience then Obama but his VP pick confirms that years and experience don't necessarely translate in better judgment...

P. D.   September 3rd, 2008 1:51 pm ET

Oh please! Palin is destroynig herself. Her views, her policies are not what the majority want. They want change, they want healthcare, they don't want an evangelical to write policy. Women want access to contraceptives and sex education.

It Would Be Nice   September 3rd, 2008 1:51 pm ET

Faux media scandal for faux presidential candidates! John McCain and Sarah Palin. Guess that goes along with the recession that's all in heads eh whiners? Yeah right. Get a job, John McCain. Or better yet, apply for Social Security...That hiding behind a woman crap is so see through like her dress that you were looking so hard at. CIndy out and Sarah in. Well at least you do great in some areas, eh John?

H   September 3rd, 2008 1:50 pm ET

ALL YOU IDIOT – OBAMA AND HIS SUPPORTERS WERE SO BIAS AGAINST HILLARY CLINTON AND NOW THEY WILL GO AFTER PALIN. REMEMBER ANN OAKLEY. ASK OBAMA ABOUT THIS STATEMENT AND MANY MORE . AS FAR A MICHELLE OBAMA – SHE DID IT TO HERSELF. ESPECIALLY WHEN ASKED IF SHE WOULD VOTE FOR HILLARY CLINTON AND ANSWERED NO, NO, NO.

COME ON GET A LIFE. I WILL PROBABLY BE ONE OF THOSE AMERICAN WHO WILL NOT VOTE.

Ted   September 3rd, 2008 1:50 pm ET

Sarah Palin has far more executive experience than either of the dems good ole boys do. The media witch hunt is well beyond journalistic guidelines, but what should we expect when we find reporters and anchors competing to not report the news, but rather create it? As someone else has pointed out, what happened to our free press?

SONGBIRD MCCAIN   September 3rd, 2008 1:50 pm ET

I blame Bill Clinton. He is responsible for every bad thing that has happened since 1992, right?

Gail   September 3rd, 2008 1:50 pm ET

Interesting that the McCain Campaign would use the word whine.
They call American's whinners. The McCain Campaign whined about not getting equal media coverage. Soooo the media shifted to give them more coverage. Then when Cambell Brown (CNN) tried to get some answers from a McCain spokesperson re: Palin yesterday, The Campaign started whinning and pulled the interview from Larry King last night. They don't want us (The public to know them.) The seem to just stomp their feet, step on everybodys toes trying to get they want. When they are accommodated, they want more of "thier way".

Vegas   September 3rd, 2008 1:50 pm ET

I love it...

Obama again is doing something he said he wouldn't... and taking it to another level... he's now attacking mothers and their children...

This is great... this vile attacking by the Obama campaign is exactly what's needed to motivate the undecided... especially women.

The DNC is stupid enough to let this go on too... nobody is remembering the other negative attacks... this is front and center all over the country... this mornings poll showed 87% believe these attacks are sexist and vile in nature... and based on rumor.

Good, Good, Good.... Keep it up Obama... Slander those women!

McCain/Palin

maryann   September 3rd, 2008 1:50 pm ET

LET HE WHO IS WITHOUT SIN CAST THE FIRST STONE....as parents we raise our children the best we know how, we cannot oversee their every move. I thought i was a very strict parent and my oldest daughter had a baby at 16. We can only hope they do the best they can, their actions are their own. Governor Palin is just like the rest of us, facing everyday problems. The only ones who have a real problem is the media. She knew what it would be like and she is facing it boldly. I am a longtime democrat but I will support the McCain/Palin ticket. Shame on anyone who tries to put this family down.

Richard   September 3rd, 2008 1:50 pm ET

Simply a Joke the McCain campaign has become. This is more clarification on why Sen. McCain does not have the temperment or judgement to be President of the USA. Picking a person with no experience other than being governer of a state of 600K people and the mayor of mayberry to be in line for the #1 job in the land is reckless and puts his campaign first. NOT COUNTRY FIRST.

LIEberman and MCSAME as BUSH are truly two peas in a pod. MCSAME, YOu are a sellout. I can't believe you didn't make your own decision and go with TOM RIDGE. Thank you for giving Obama PA. Tom Ridge might have won the election. Sarah Palin will win it for Obama.

Republicans for Change
Republicans for Obama/Biden

Bill Tampa   September 3rd, 2008 1:50 pm ET

Republicans are soooo..Hypocritical..when they were running the celebrity adds, they didn't care if it was negative, or when the Republican 527's attacked Michelle, did they say it was unfair?...NOPE...What comes around goes around.
And tell all of those old farts at your convention to look alive. They put me to sleep last night.

Mike, Syracuse NY   September 3rd, 2008 1:50 pm ET

Karen-Pheonix, you need to get a life babe; because you are living in an alternate reality.

Enlightened Voter, you can join Karen. If I hear you describe the amateur as brilliant again, I think I'll puke. He's the most unqualified candidate of either party in 100 years. Palin has more leadership experience than Obama. What has Obama run? He rattles of figures about his 2500 person campaign. Well Palin manages 15,000 state employees and a budget of $12 billion. Name one major bill Obama was primary sponsor for in either the US or IL Senate. You can't. He was too busy voting 'present' when he bothered to vote at all.

freddie   September 3rd, 2008 1:49 pm ET

I don't understand the R's claiming it's sexism to want to know everything about the unknown VP pick of a 72 year old candidate! Especially when Sarah herself said Hillary was not doing herself any favors and was whining sexism during the primaries? You can believe if all the experience and family history was the same but it was a man...the media would be all over it and worse! They are afraid to say what they really think and ask the questions they really want because they will be accused of sexism and bias. Sounds like the R's protest too much.

And by the way...if McCain/Palin would happen to win (in a bizzaro universe somewhere) – you can all take solice and feel secure that your VP can field dress a moose! W to the T to the F!

CSD   September 3rd, 2008 1:49 pm ET

"Faux media scandal"???? Nominating an under-investigation creationist with a secessionist history, naked photos, and a raving "abstinence-only" pixie dust lunatic with a 17YO knocked-up daughter?......One who thinks that proximity to Russia counts as foreign policy experience?? One with two failed businesses on her resume, one of which was "involuntarily dissolved" by the state for non-payment of taxes and non-filing of corporate reports, with the letter of disolution to her on HER DEPARTMENT'S letterhead?........Wow, that's some faux scandal. What a senile, demented old fool.

Slim, Seattle WA   September 3rd, 2008 1:49 pm ET

I like to Thank Campbell Brown for grilling the Mc Bush advisor Tucker the sissy. The Mc Cain camp is a bunch of Republican whiners and wimp. Campbell Brown did a good job!

Jeya   September 3rd, 2008 1:49 pm ET

Campbell Brown is a disgrace for the reporting community. I wonder if she has ever questioned any OOObama people like the way she questions Mccain's campaign regarding Sarah Palin's experience.

Months aga if they had asked such questions to the Obama campaign, Hiliary would have won the nomination.

Media was solely responsible for Hiliary's loss and now they are trying to do the same for Sarah Palin.

Linda   September 3rd, 2008 1:49 pm ET

McCain was desparate for votes, got a woman, any woman to be his vp thinking all the women are so stupid they would fall for it and he would get there votes with no questions!! Well the average American voter is not stupid and does want honest answers, has a right to ask. The republicans sure tried to rip Obama. This isn't sexism any more than it would be racism when you ask Obama questions, and he doesn't whine and say it is. The last 8 years with Bush has really wrecked this country and I don't believe we can survive with 4 more. McCain is too old and out of touch. All he talks about is war and being a POW, which was awful for him and I give him all the deserved credit for that. But he needs to think ahead instead of concentrating on the past and using that to run for president. Now he's scheming putting an unknown woman on his ticket.
VOTE OBAMA/BIDEN

Jim in Raleigh   September 3rd, 2008 1:49 pm ET

You would think that any intelligent group of folks, having supposedly vetted Palin for six months (SIX MONTHS??) would know some of this stuff would show up – would have checked back issues of her local newspapers, would know that not only is there a concern about Troopergate, but that she tried to fire a county librarian who wouldn't ban books she wanted banned.

Either they are totally clueless as to how people would react when they found out some of these things, or they were stupid enough to think we would continue to swallow the misdirection and misinformation the Republican Party has become known for ever since they sold us a bill of goods in Iraq, lying about why we needed to go in, and then changing the reason for the invasion every time their reasons got shot down.

Will-South Dakota   September 3rd, 2008 1:49 pm ET

McBush is wondering how to Dump her off the ticket....What a snub to Rommney,,,,,bet Mitt is rubbing his hands together jsut waiting for the call.

emily   September 3rd, 2008 1:49 pm ET

women are not that stupid

David in Los Angeles   September 3rd, 2008 1:49 pm ET

Has anyone noticed the difference in composition of those delegates actually attending the RNC and DNC conventions? The RNC version appears to be over 90% white and wealthy-attired. The DNC version seemed to have people from every color and background. The contrast is startling to me. One version seems to show our presnt and future, the other is a throwback to the past.

laura   September 3rd, 2008 1:49 pm ET

Poor baby ...... that is so unfair! It is not like McCain people were out for blood with Hillary ....

Fair is fair ..

PAT California   September 3rd, 2008 1:48 pm ET

They complain about Obama's inexperience!!!! Well, now who is inexperienced? Obama has been playing hard ball in the big leagues and Palin has been playing softball in the sandlot! It's not about her being a female. She's the WRONG female! But again, you have to search awfully hard to find a political beauty queen in the boonies so you have something nice to look at in the Oval Office!

scdem   September 3rd, 2008 1:48 pm ET

The McCain camp has no one to blame but themselves. They are the ones who threw out this unknown person with almost no information. The void of hard facts gives room for rumors to grow and has caused a media frenzy to find out the truth.

All the Kings Horses and All the Kings Men Couldn't Put Fallen Little Miss Ice Chip Together Again!   September 3rd, 2008 1:48 pm ET

Looks like Chip on the above post knew Sarah Palin better than McCain himself. Chip? As in ice chip? As in the size of the "town" in which she was mayor? As in the total human population compared to wildlife of Alalska?

Tim   September 3rd, 2008 1:48 pm ET

It's funny how there is no comment link for the Reid story. CNN know's there is nothing good to say about Reid, so they don't provide the ability to add comments.

Anonymous   September 3rd, 2008 1:47 pm ET

Can't touch McCain because he's a "war hero," and can't touch Palin because she's the first female Republican nominee.

Isn't it a shame that in 2008 we're just getting the first female Republican VP nominee?

glittergirl   September 3rd, 2008 1:47 pm ET

what he meant to say was 6 months vetting process IN DOG YEARS.

MediaJunkie, Arlington, VA   September 3rd, 2008 1:46 pm ET

The reason the media are looking for a vetting "scandal" is because they and everyone else in this country can't believe McCain knowingly chose not only a political unknown, but a person with an unmarried pregnant teenage daughter, sketchy firing of a state official in her past, and ties to a group that advocates a state seceding from the U.S.

J.L.   September 3rd, 2008 1:46 pm ET

This is pretty laughable. Typical Republican rhetoric... the media is bad if they actually do some digging (which they should have been doing back in 2003 before the war in Iraq). Lets see... next thing they should be doing is getting "offended" and saying that her patriotism is being attacked... etc.. etc...

I will agree though... the DWI with her husband should really be a non-issue. Happened 20 years ago... what's the point? Her pregnant 17-year old daughter.. now that is a valid issue. This has nothing to do with her being a "bad" mom or anything like that. Or even the "family values" thing (although there can be so much you can write about that...) This brings into focus the issue of some of the conservative policies. Abstinence-only education vs. sex education. Sorry to say... all too perfect example of that policy not working... here's a woman who touts that policy yet see the results.

TexicoFrom Mexico   September 3rd, 2008 1:46 pm ET

COUNTRY FIRST? WHICH COUNTRY? THE WHITE COUNTRY? I DID NOT SEE MANY IF ANY PEOPLE OF COLORS AT THE RNC!!! LOOKED LIKE A SEA OF RICH, OLDER AND WHITE TO ME! SO IS THAT THE COUNTRY WE SPEAK OF?

Nate- Minneapolis   September 3rd, 2008 1:46 pm ET

I think everyone should question McCain's pick of Palin for these reasons.

1. This was a rushed pick. She was not properly vetted by the McCain campaign. McCain does not know this woman as he had only met her once and only spoken to her twice. Nobody knows who she is.
2. McCain had 3 other people he would have rather chosen, but chose Palin for polictical reason which suggests this was not McCain's choice. This choice was made so he could cater to the far right of the party- like most of the issues he's altered his position on.
3. Palin's lack of national and international experience. The people who suggest she's is more qualified than Obama are the people who made the choice and would look foolish admitting she may be underexperienced. The reality is that Mrs. Palin was the mayor of a town of 8000 people and the governor of a state with less people than most large cities in the US. She has no experience with most issues she'll face as VP. Her executive experience as the RNC suggests is vastly overrated.
4. There are dozens of more qualified republicans that round out this ticket. (MN Senator Norm Coleman was mayor of St. Paul, and has two terms as a US Senator- by far more experience.) Why was she chosen over all these other qualified people. If she was a man would she have been picked.

Josh O   September 3rd, 2008 1:46 pm ET

If you are going to post about experience, at least don't compare apples to oranges... Obama isn't running against Palin...

Its McCain/Palin vs Obama/Biden and that breakdown looks like this

Dem Nominee Obama:
B.A in political science from Columbia University, with a specialization in international relations
J.D. in Law from Harvard, graduated magna cum laude;
12 years (92-04) teaching constitutional law
7 years State Senator:
4 years Senator for Illinos

Dem Vp Nominee Joe Biden:
School: University of Deleware (history poli sci) and Syracuse (law school)
2 years New castle county council
35 years US senate

Or you have the Republican ticket

McCain:
School: US Naval Academy

21 years US Navy, POW, Naval liaison Officer to Washington

4 years US House of Representatives AZ 1st District

21 years US Senate

2000 Presidential Candidate

Palin:
Bachelor's in journalism from University of Idaho

4 years Wasilla City Council (8000 people)

6 years Wasilla mayor (8000 people)

1 year "Ethics Commissioner of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission"

20 months governor of a state with 660,000 people

Sharlene   September 3rd, 2008 1:46 pm ET

This is exactly what they wanted. They want to hide behind the fact that she is woman and not talk about the issues. We need to be informed because this lady has a high change of being a president with John McCain being 72 and having had cancer 4 times.

I don't care about her daughter pregnancy, but I do care that she is for abstinence only. What about SCD's?

I don't care about her executive experience, but i do care about her foreign experience. She could easily be president and we are in 2 WARS!

Does she even understand the law? How well does she know the constitution? How well does she understand our relationship with other countries?

She may be a great lady and a reformer, but give her a job working with the budget, no vice president of the free world! This is a critical time and McCain/Paln do not seem to have a plan.

Lori   September 3rd, 2008 1:46 pm ET

Thank god the media is doing the vetting thta Mc Cain did not. Palin could be a heartbeat form the presidency and I see no experience so far that qualifies her for that job. I will not vote for McCain because of his VP choice...clearly a political decision....I ask, is this putting country first?

Daniel   September 3rd, 2008 1:46 pm ET

"The McCain campaign will have no further comment about our long and thorough process. This nonsense is over. .The American people get to do the vetting now on Election Day – November 4th."

In other words, this is over because I say it is! Who does this thug think he is? News Flash buddy, something doesn't just go away because you say it does.

And we can make up our mind about her and McCain on election day?

Personally I'd rather know about someone BEFORE I vote for them.

Anna SW Missouri   September 3rd, 2008 1:46 pm ET

I am a Republican woman, mother, grandmother, and a rape victim at the age of 20. That was in 1970. Roe v. Wade had not been decided. I had a Catholic doctor that did not even discuss the option of adoption with me, he just encouraged me to have the child. I did, and I raised her. I was made to feel that if I talked about being raped, that it was my own fault. She is now 37 years old and she will agree that for any mother to say that she would insist on her own daughter to have the child that was conceived during a rape doesn't deserve to even be a mother. My daughter and I survived and we love each other, but we both have lived throught it and would never put another woman, especially a young teen girl through it. At some time, when you decide to bring a child into the world, you make a commitment to protect that child after it is born. If you believe as Sarah Palin believes, you only protect that child until it is born.

Anonymous   September 3rd, 2008 1:46 pm ET

Mike in Columbus September 3rd, 2008 12:20 pm ET

It seems clear now, the Palin pick was also intended to create an untouchable candidate. Any an all attacks are simply boiled down to attempts to "destroy the first female Republican nominee for Vice President of the United States".

Tricks and Gimmicks, that's all McCain's got.
------------

This seems to hit the nail on the head. Well put.

same fool from 8 years ago   September 3rd, 2008 1:46 pm ET

Why didn't you vote for McCain previously?? Because he was veiwed as an idiot!! Guess what?? Nothing about him has changed. He is preaching the same old stuff military hero, maverick, etc... I didn't buy it before why buy it now. The only reason why is he beat a list of dead beats with health or moral issues that dropped out of the race. We don't need another WAR hungry individual looking to make a name for himself; this is the reason we are in the mess that we are currently in. Mrs. Palin didn't have time to watch over her kids because she was pregnant and Gov of Alaska; what is going to happen now that she has a sick newborn and a teenage kid about to have a baby? this is reckless. I have a sick kid and it is very hard, so thing or someone is not going to get the attention that it need. I hope and pray for all of US that it is not our country that gets set aside in the bid for self promotion. I think it is a shame that this woman is considering this position at this point in her life. If she is the great candidate that the GOP wants us to believe then she should wait for her turn. RUN on her own not as a side show.

Allan dallas   September 3rd, 2008 1:46 pm ET

You Obama's lover,tell me Obama done one thing really good. Noting. He is fraud and just bla bla bla.

larry Rosenbauam   September 3rd, 2008 1:45 pm ET

Attn:Small town NC

Your dumb and dumber comment that Obama the communist is exactly why he will win in November. The American people are much smarter than you obviously give them credit for

Linda   September 3rd, 2008 1:45 pm ET

This campaign is consistently trying to use the "gender prejudice" card in Palin's favor - the media is exposing and unexperienced and poorly vetted candidate - and trying to ruin the "first FEMALE VP candidate" has nothing to do with it. McCain please next time, do your homework and you won't have to pull out ridiculous arguments in your defense; it just looks pathetic!!!

David   September 3rd, 2008 1:45 pm ET

This is obvious. The media could not stand that this VP pick upstaged the Dems VP pick.

Born Again Democrat   September 3rd, 2008 1:45 pm ET

When I watched the rublicans last night, I noticed the crowd. Yes, suited white men, older Americans, fewer minorities, fewer smiles. then Liberman came out and just smiled and lied...alot. It even makes me nervous that he was even considered VP material.

Our leaders have to have intregrity and honesty. Who can be Pro Life and Pro War? Who can promote sexually abstinence when education is the only thing that will empower people to change? Who can leave a small govenorship and step into the spotlight exposing her kids? Not the kind of leader I want.

The phone rings at 3am. Who do we want to answer it? We'd really better think about this again and this time for real.

Carrie   September 3rd, 2008 1:45 pm ET

The people vetted Obama by electing him. Last time I checked, this is democracy at work. Gov Palin was CHOSEN by McCain and the only vetting that is going to have to take place is by the media since it does not seem that McCain didn't really do it himself and even Republicans in Alaska will tell you this. And by the way, why are all these vetters in Alaska now?

Timber   September 3rd, 2008 1:45 pm ET

The media destroyed Clinton in the primaries and now their sights are set on Palin. Shame on them. Shame on the DNC and Obama.

Amanda   September 3rd, 2008 1:45 pm ET

Thanks for not posting my comment!! I didn't say anything wrong!

Danny G. Boca Raton, FL   September 3rd, 2008 1:45 pm ET

American Politics are so amazing; it appears to me that McCain Knew exactly what he was doing selecting Gov. Palin. he has the spotlight and he is controlling the news and on top of that the incredible bad job the media is doing in handling her has let to energize the Republican party to energize behind her and McCain. Brilliant in his part. Naive on the Media's part to have been played like this. Now McCain has level the plain field; we will continue to see coverage of Gov. Palin and the Republicans have accomplished a lot by taking away from the historic message Sen. Obama delivered last week. this move was almost as good as picking Sen. Lieberman for the ticket it has that kind of impact. Sen. McCain and the Republicans are ready to play ball, the question is: are the Dems ready?

Facinating! we still have 3 debates and a VP debate and 60 days before we vote... stay tune. this is going to be close.

Sad Voter   September 3rd, 2008 1:45 pm ET

all I hear is "whining" coming from the RNC. pathetic...I made the mistake of voting for Bush in the past. I'm not going to make the mistake again.

Nadeem   September 3rd, 2008 1:45 pm ET

They have to be nuts!

If she was properly vetted and the McCain camp know all of this stuff they were morons for choosing her.

Who would shoose someone with so much baggage and so little experience.

The republcan party and McCain who have been on the wrong side of every womans right issue in the last 30 years crying sexism, give me a breat. McCain who attacked Chelsea when she was a teenager – what a bunch of crazies.

If you can't stand the heat get out of the kitchen.

Christy   September 3rd, 2008 1:45 pm ET

PRO-LIFE...Unless you're in the military or a moose

Brian, New York   September 3rd, 2008 1:45 pm ET

And they says she is more qualified than Obama with a straight face...be real....

THE COSMOS ROCKS   September 3rd, 2008 1:45 pm ET

»GO McCain/Palin!...GO!...CONGRATULATIONS to the great man JohnMcCain:-HE CHOSE WELL!...Sarah Palin= WONDERFUL!... HURRAH for America!...HURRAH for Sarah Palin!...All right.

Mark   September 3rd, 2008 1:45 pm ET

One of the first and most important decision's a candidate can make is to pick a running mate that is qualified and make sure that choice is ready. John McCain and the RNP fish bowl blew it.

If McCain's aid Steve Schmidt really believes that they did a rigerous 6 months vetting of sarah palin< Why ? then, Are there so many questions . If Steve Schmist is so smart then maybe we should all remove the signs on our foreheads "STUPID" and put one on his.

I wouldnt call this the straight talk express, it's more like the slieght talk express.

With the McCain republicans it 's the same smoke and mirrors show we been subjected to the last 8 years, Nothing differant, no changes

RAE   September 3rd, 2008 1:45 pm ET

I DO NOT LIKE THE WAY THE MCCAIN CAMP IS HANDLING THE THE ISSUES SURROUNDING SARAH PALIN. SHE MAYBE A VERY SMART SWEET LADY, HOWEVER, SO ARE MANY MORE. LEVI JOHNSTON'S MOTHER SAID SHE HAD TO ACCEPT THE ISSUE OF THE PREGNANCY BUT KNEW THAT IT WOULD BE HARD. I AM A TAD CONCERNED IS TO WHY BRISTOL TRANSFERRED SCHOOL LAST YEAR DURING THE SCHOOL YEAR. ALSO, WHY DOES PALIN'S HUSBAND ALSO GO BY THE NAME OF PELIA? THERE ARE MANY QUESTIONS THAT STILL MAKE WOMEN NERVOUS.

M Murphy-Missouri   September 3rd, 2008 1:45 pm ET

She is not a Hillary Clinton. I'm actually insulted the Republican party thinks I'll support any women candidate. Palin does not have the experience needed to be President if called upon. This VP pick isn't getting my vote. I'm writing in Hillary and voting for a Democratic congress.

Cathy Brandes   September 3rd, 2008 1:45 pm ET

I don't believe the media is being unfair – no one knows much about her and it is apparent she was not his first choice.
I believe the bigger issue is the situation surrounding the police commissioner and the firing or non-firing of her former brother-in-law due to a messy divorce, bridge to nowhere and lobbyists money when McCain specifically stated she was against.
I can not fathom the GOP feels being mayor of a small town and a one term govenor gives her executive experience. This choice was an appeasment to the evangelical base and now we need to move on to the debates and the election in the fall.

Joseph Adewole   September 3rd, 2008 1:45 pm ET

Only people like her are in the Republican Party; its most unfortunate.

cal   September 3rd, 2008 1:45 pm ET

I am so sick of this woman and her baby and pregnant daughter. Where are the issues? who give a flying fig about her baby and daughter. This woman is a time bomb people, give a it a rest she will blow this race for mccain for sure.

I cannot believe the feed back last night from you media people. You tried to down play the democratic first night but the reps did not even discuss the #1 issue economy. You prejudice big mouhths think you know everything you morons make me sick, especially David Gergen, what a joke he is.

Obama /Biden

Connie (Chicago)   September 3rd, 2008 1:44 pm ET

The media would NOT be doing the vetting if the CANDIDATES TEAM had done it before she was asked!
How easy was it proven to be by the average Joe or Jane American to type her name into a search engine?
The questions will continue until YOU ANSWER THEM!

This is another example of a campaign not being well run...
We have not seen such mishandling of an important decision like this with the Obama camp because they VETTED their VP pick...
We the public DEMAND answers..You want OUR VOTE...you OWE us answers Senator McCain

Sheri   September 3rd, 2008 1:44 pm ET

So whats up with the 32 propaganda tapes that McCain made as a POW? I would like to hear more about that

bigfruitbasket   September 3rd, 2008 1:44 pm ET

When I weigh the tickets, I ask this question–what if something happens to Sen. Obama (God forbid)? Joe Biden is an excellent VP choice–loads of experience. What if something happens to Sen. McCain (God forbid)? Miss Alaska is the Prez? Do what? If Obama has no experience, then this lady had less than none. The Republicans are making huge blunders on a daily basis. And to you folks who say her personal life is a non-issue, then don't run for the highest office in the land. The GOP better hope the pregnancy scandal stays front and center–sounds like Miss Alaska should stay in her home state to take care of business, both personally and professionally. As soon as she was announced as McCain's VP–I asked if he was serious about losing the Presidential race. Doesn't seem like he wants to win. And, BTW–I'm a registered Republican and I think my party has been sold down the road to the Oral Minority Neo-cons. Palin is an awful choice for VP. And it has nothing to do with being a woman.

FormerGOP   September 3rd, 2008 1:44 pm ET

Mike TX
Resko is in jail what do we still need to investigate

Ledia   September 3rd, 2008 1:44 pm ET

Why doesn't the Mcain camp say anything when FOX news continously lie about Obama? It hurts now, doesn't it?
What happened to Palin telling Hillary to stop whining? Palin toughen up!

MBell_TX   September 3rd, 2008 1:44 pm ET

Where are the Checks and Balance of the media?
The media no longer strives or prides itself in unbiased coverage.
Instead it seeks to spin, feed conflict, sensationalize information in a way that promotes distrust, and promote agendas that are counter to a civil society.
They are feeding a beast that has an unquenchable appetite for victims and conflict.

zscott   September 3rd, 2008 1:44 pm ET

please... you're blaming the media for vetting your candidate... they're only doing the job you neglected to do...

Tim   September 3rd, 2008 1:44 pm ET

When are the media going to be asking Obama about his long history of drug use? That's more relavent than whether or not Palin's daughter is pregnant, by anyone's standards.

The Republican's need to call out the names of the media who are Obama aides, and do it during the convention and through election day.

Peter, MI   September 3rd, 2008 1:44 pm ET

whereas fauxnews is the Republican mouthpiece and msnbc is at times too liberal, I think of the MSM only CNN is left of being balanced.
They grilled Obama for weeks and weeks, and I was really getting angry and looking forward to see if they will be balanced and grill the McCain campaign the same way.
I am glad and thankful they do.
Thanks CNN for being fair to both sides.

george   September 3rd, 2008 1:44 pm ET

If the ol' boys club of both political parties could defeat Hillary Clinton, they can easily destroy Sarah Palin. With them it's "No Woman, No Way, No How". They're probably hoping Palin will withdraw her name and Romney will step in. We need to change the sexist attitude of this country or we'll just hurt our nation in the longrun by denying some higher qualified women the position of leadership.

Jerry---Illinois   September 3rd, 2008 1:44 pm ET

Sarah Palin seems like a nice lady from Alaska.
Lets just wait a while longer for a final report.
But I did hear that she knows all about Russia
as its only 90 miles across the straits of Alaska, hows
that for foreign experience.

Curtis - Marietta, GA   September 3rd, 2008 1:44 pm ET

It's funny to watch Republicans have to defend their experience...they can't do it. I'll give it to McCain, he picked someone who is new to the scene and isn't part of established politics. But, this is what happens when you do that.

Get used to it. The people have a right to ensure that the person who will replace their president if god forbid something were to happen them is qualified. I think the pressure the McCain camp is feeling is called "buyer's remorse".

Really Palin Who?? Women for Obama   September 3rd, 2008 1:44 pm ET

By the Math of the republicans they are saying she is more qualified then McCain since McShame was never a Governor..

Gimmie a break.....All the Republicans agenda is bash bash Obama...and they don't even say how they will fix anything...I saw Joe (Benedict Arnold ) Lieberman and other spewing the script that she is qualifies and then trash Obama....gees tell us how you will solve the issues!!! and then to not do any research about this woman...she is fair game and she deserves it...my god this woman views take us way right off the cliff...back in time....Women will lose their right to choose for themselves and so any woman that gets raped will have to have the child.....Repulicans don't care about our country...if they did look at our schools and our roads and all the jobs going over seas to China...

NO TO MCCAIN/ PALIN

mike   September 3rd, 2008 1:44 pm ET

What on earth kind of coverage did they expect after announcing this vastly underqualified VP choice with a colorful background. The fact no one knows who she is would prompt instant media coverage. The fact she has no business being considered for the second most important job in the world is another. These republican schemes will backfie. This is nothing personal and is not sexist. Sarah Palin is a terrible choice and a gamble by McCain. Do we expect the media to ignore this fact. Get Real.

Rob   September 3rd, 2008 1:43 pm ET

It's good to see all the Feminist groups standing up for Sarah Palin in the face of these sexist and disgraceful attacks.....wait..what? They are leading the charge against her? Nancy Pelosi can have 5 kids and handle Speaker of the House duties but Palin is stretching too thin with her 5 kids and VP? Egads the double standard!

Feminism = Liberalism

Media = DNC part duex

Donna   September 3rd, 2008 1:43 pm ET

You people are pathetic. It is none of your business who McCain picks for a VP. WHY ISN'T SOMEONE LOOKING INTO OBAMA'S DNA HE HAS HAD MANY NAMES? He could be anyone. No one knows his background it is grounded in Kenya and Indonesia. What is Joe Biden's kid who has been in many incidents, where is his interrogation? Where is the fairness there? Of course you are not interested in being fair. Americans will not fall for this crap. You are angering the 50% of Americans who don't vote and when they do it will be for McCain

Alan   September 3rd, 2008 1:43 pm ET

You know, for an alleged maverick and supposedly strong candidate who will fearlessly lead us in to the future, according to the Republicans, McCain's campaign has whined constantly about not getting enough press attention, which seem more like the actions of a lonely teenager on facebook. Can anyone recall a presidential campaign in which a candidate's campaign complained more about press coverage? I saw Campbell Brown's interview with Tucker from the McCain campaign and it boiled down to the simple fact that he utterly refused to give a straight answer to a direct question. He gave the impression that he simply did not have an answer, and for McCain to cancel an interview in response, again, seems like the actions of a petulant child and not a presidential candidate. So first they complain that they aren't getting enough coverage, and then they use petty reprisals when they don't get the cushy coverage they want? This is just absurd.

Time for Change / everywhere USA   September 3rd, 2008 1:43 pm ET

we need to send the Right Wing political machine a message and vote in Obama. unless we do that they'll continue with their politics of divide and conquer. Obama will unify the country.

nannie bouroughs, Kenosha, WI   September 3rd, 2008 1:43 pm ET

I certainly agree that the McCain camp has plenty of legitimate arguments regarding how the Elite Media has covered both his campaign and Sarah Palin... it is now the voters in America turn to VET and ELECT John McCain in November and by doing so really tell the LIBERAL MEDIA WHERE TO GO!

lee   September 3rd, 2008 1:43 pm ET

I used to respect McCain when he ran against Bush in the 2000 primaries. Now with Palin he sounds just like Bush picking Brownie to head FEMA and Harriet Miers for Supreme Court, both woefully inadequate for those positions. Palin is just as pathetic. I would have respected him if he had made a decent thoughtful choice, but he didn't..
Obama 08

BMitchell   September 3rd, 2008 1:43 pm ET

Vote for McCain and put an Alaskan Hillbilly family a 72 year old heartbeat away from the oval office and the Red Button.

If McCain can't get the message back to himself as President, rather than having his questionable pick as VP the subject of attention the battle is lost and so is the Presidency.

clevin giles   September 3rd, 2008 1:43 pm ET

Red, Red WHINE

Nicole In NE   September 3rd, 2008 1:43 pm ET

LOL, you're right Joey – John McCain of 2000 would NOT even think about being buddies with the John McCain of 2008!

Phil   September 3rd, 2008 1:43 pm ET

Wow. McCain is upset because he can't pull a quick one this time. The fact is that Palin is not qualified. McCain would be the oldest 1st term president and he already has had cancer two times. For anyone to say that his VP pick is not important is absurd. McCain must have realized this but still chose to put politics over our national security and best interests. National politics are very different from state politics, especially when your state is the most isolated and most sparsely populated state in the union. McCain has already blundered his first presidential decision.
Also, Palins daughter and the rest of her family is an issue because the Republicans are making it an issue by flaunting them on stage tonight. What message is this sending? Teen pregnancy is good??? What about your abstinence programs and stance against premarital sex? You can't have it both ways!
I peronsally think the DWI is irrelevant. But what about Palin and her husbands ties to the AIP??? We want a holder of a public federal office to be part of a seccession coalition? That is not very patriotic soudning to me and almost sounds like it could be walking on the line of treason.
No how. No way. No McCain.

Norm Stephenson   September 3rd, 2008 1:43 pm ET

It is pretty clear that the Democratic Media has been sexist during the election cycle. They were elated that Hillary went down and now want Sarah to go the same way. So much for the fair left wing media.

Catalino Jacinto   September 3rd, 2008 1:43 pm ET

If McCain can't handle the media, how is he going to protect our wonderful country from terrorists, wars, and other disasters?

Mary   September 3rd, 2008 1:42 pm ET

"The nonsense is over." Over?? Anyone else uneasy with the kissy- huggy greetings between McCain and Palin? Cindy did, tapped him on the shoulder, and told him to move on. He looks like a giddy schoolboy! The whole thing is ludicrous. Even though I'm a democrat, I believe that McCain had much better choices for VP than this woman. One more piece of insanity for the 2008 elections.

Dave in Atlanta   September 3rd, 2008 1:42 pm ET

Okay, this whole thing of BOTH SIDES accusing the media of bias is becoming old very quickly.

Anonymous   September 3rd, 2008 1:42 pm ET

NO Obama NO Obama No Obama.

Texas Witch Twister   September 3rd, 2008 1:42 pm ET

McCain you might as well get used to the barrage that the media is going to toss at Palin. They did their best to ruin Hillary and I would have to say succeeded at least enough by rook and crook of the DNC to get OBAMA elected as their candidate. You and Palin need to stay with them and fight tooth an nail or we will have an unfit couple of Democrats as President And VP of the United States. The shame of all this that there are so many Americans who can't see the lightening for the rainbow.

dalton   September 3rd, 2008 1:42 pm ET

As a family physician, and registered republican, I am VERY
concerned about the choice of Sarah Palin,...
Family does come first, and so does our country.

I honestly think Sarah Palin could be great in time.
But this is not her time.. NOT based on exeperience. Not based on her family needs.

OUR country means to much to accept her as a heart beat away from McCain.!!!!

Bill in Ct.   September 3rd, 2008 1:42 pm ET

To: PHIL / TEXAS The only way you corrupt republicans are going to win the election this year, you're going to have to CHEAT like your corrupt party did in 2000 in Florida and 04 in Ohio. Throwing people votes out, not letting people vote in their district, putting broken machines in some areas, setting up road blocks in some areas so people can't vote, rigging voting machines so when you vote for Obama it goes to Mcsame, having died people voting, thats right dead people voted down in Florida back in 2000 for Bush.

Shirley-Ohio   September 3rd, 2008 1:42 pm ET

Well know they know how Obama felt when they did this to him as the first black candidate. They did him the exact same way. It is not the media, the media is nobody's friend, black, white, woman, man, boy, girl. This is the media's job. This is what they get paid to do. This is how they make a living. If you give them a story they are going to run with it. Obama made his way through and now she must make her way through if she is tough enough. Obama has made his way through it.

otto   September 3rd, 2008 1:42 pm ET

i think this strategy by the mccain campian should be nipped in the bud. he first accusation fo media bias got him the attention he needed and what did he do with it....bash obama and come out with the celebrity ad. without making any mention of his plans for his "country the he loves" and now he's using the same technique so as to get the people and media to overlook the fact that his pick of sarah palin is in deep disregard for the situation facing american today.

KATHLEEN   September 3rd, 2008 1:42 pm ET

IT WAS NOT ALL THE MEDIA. IT WAS JOHN MCCAIN AND HIS
BIG SURPRISE. HE SHOULD PUT SOME OF THE BLAME ON HIMSELF!

Americans are tired of being surprised, and tricked by this Government!!!!

John McCain reminds me of a man with a bag of tricks and
when it works, he smiles and smirks. I can't stand the man.
Or the rest of the clan.

THE COSMOS ROCKS   September 3rd, 2008 1:42 pm ET

»Sarah Palin is soooo WONDERFUL!...SOOO LOVELY!...So SMART!...HURRAH!...HURRAH!...She will be a GREAT VP!...Yes. This is the way,in USA!...All right.HURRAH!...

John   September 3rd, 2008 1:42 pm ET

Ready for change

Michelle Obama probably has a 9-5 job, both her children are in school and she Does Not have a special Needs child. Your arguement here is totally stupid. It's Palin's experience that sucks.

Jen   September 3rd, 2008 1:42 pm ET

The claim is absurd!! The Republicans are now playing the gender card. "Do not criticize me because I am a woman." - Jenny

obama warrior   September 3rd, 2008 1:41 pm ET

OH say it ain't so !!! obama on the O'RIELLY FACTOR ?!!! , OH NO, whose bright ideal was this ? obama ! where a flax jacket, bring a gun your gonna have to shoot this fool !!!

joe barber   September 3rd, 2008 1:41 pm ET

Media is like sharks, they smell blood and fresh meat.

bennie texas   September 3rd, 2008 1:41 pm ET

dont

FormerGOP   September 3rd, 2008 1:41 pm ET

Why do the RNC need to compare her record to Obama’s this is not about a comparison she has only been a Govr. For 18 months. Period! What does that have to do with Obama? NOTHING!

zack   September 3rd, 2008 1:41 pm ET

Chip Chip (my friend).......I also knew she was being considered. I still need to know more for myself.

And please stop using those code words like liberal and media bias, they may work on your people since it seems like they operate like a herd just by listening to a couple of code words so they can be steered into a given direction. It doesn't work on more intelligent people.

please?   September 3rd, 2008 1:41 pm ET

My God, could the possible whine any more????? It's the media's fault, its the angry left's fault, it's the American people's fault......

Owen H.   September 3rd, 2008 1:41 pm ET

"Her selection came after a six-month long rigorous vetting process where her extraordinary credentials and exceptionalism became clear."

So this 'rigorous process' began before the primaries? Pretty cocky, especially for a campaign that was about to go broke. Also – what kind of 'long rigorous vetting process' entails meeting with a top candidate only once?

Dennis   September 3rd, 2008 1:41 pm ET

Republicans need to quit getting mad when the media does their job. They are trying to find out more about Palin, good and bad. You're basically asking all of us to believe exactly what camp McCain wants us to believe about her. No one is perfect and we deserve to know, just like everyone has looked into the past of Obama and brought to light some of the 'dirt'. Now holding her daughter's situation against her is wrong, but taken as a whole, these mini 'scandals' can tell part of the story of who she is, how she operates, and how she deals with adversity. To me, she hasn't impressed me with her handling of these issues, it just feeds into the idea she's not ready. As an American, I just can't see her meeting with Putin or handling delicate policy matters. She may have done well in Alaska, but this is clearly a different animal being vice president. I happen to support Obama and likely wouldnt have liked any of McCain's choices, but there are very legitimate concerns here that these side stories feed into.

To Foreign Observer   September 3rd, 2008 1:41 pm ET

Obama
-No executive experience except for this campaign
-2500 employees
-$21 million "income" per month on average to run campaign

Palin
-20 months of executive experience which has netted her an 85% approval rating
-77,000 state employees under her supervision
-$1.2 billion monthly budget for the state

Who do you trust? I trust Palin...

btw... degrees do not matter. Ask Washington, Jefferson, Adams, Jackson, and Franklin what their degrees were. IF that is your basis on elections, then that's sad.

A leader is a leader and cannot be taught in a school.

Carole-FL   September 3rd, 2008 1:41 pm ET

I'm curious as to when "the media" choose Gov. Sarah Palin as Sen McCain's runningmate? Was Sen. McCain unaware the public figures are subject to the media scrutiny? Did it occur to the Republican presidential nominee that he and his staff should have spent some time finding the answers to the questions both the media and the public might ask? Is anyone concerned that, when Tucker Bounds cannot answer legitimate questions posed to him by Campbell Brown, the Republicans stomp off the media field crying FOUL? Does anyone in the GOP get it?

Proud Female Veteran   September 3rd, 2008 1:41 pm ET

What was it that Hill's folks said?

IF YOU CAN"T TAKE THE HEAT, STAY OUT OF THE KITCHEN!!

So, Gov Palin, IF YOU DECIDE TO STAY IN THE KITCHEN, THEN YOU BETTER DUCK BECAUSE THE KITCHEN SINK IS COMING AT YOU!

But hey, you hunt Moose right??!!

Tim   September 3rd, 2008 1:41 pm ET

Nobody wants to address how Obama is more qualified. I had to laugh last night when one of the MSNBC "reporters" questioned Palin's credentials with Newt. Newt when on to blast the report and named off a series of accomplishments in comparison to Obama, and then asked the "reporter" to name one Obama accomplishment. The reporter gave a smile and send it back up to the hatchet men.

So, what are Obama's accomplishments. Name just one.

Kool-Aid-Drinking   September 3rd, 2008 1:41 pm ET

Excuse me while I throw myself of my chair through the window in my 6th floor office.
You mean to tell me that it's the media's fault that her office fired the man who did not want to fire her ex-brother-in-law?

You mean to tell me that it's the media's fault she tried drugs?

You mean to tell me that it's the media's fault that her husband is a member of the AIP?

You mean to tell me that it's the media's fault that she wanted pork money to build the bridge to nowhere before she was against it?

You mean to tell me that it's the media's fault that she found her little city with zero debt and left with over 20 million in the red?

You mean to tell me that it's the media's fault that she doesn't know anything about the war in iraq because it was of no interest to her?

You mean to tell me that it's the media's fault her daughter did not adhere to the abstinence only policy taught at home?

Sir, I am no fan of the media either but come on how absurd are you?

Who want some of this kool-aid?

Haas   September 3rd, 2008 1:41 pm ET

Maybe if you vetted your VP you wouldn't have a problem with the media. Reps are missing the point and Obama should have included all Reps as the people who "just don't get it." It's not about Palin character or her record. The point is McCain really wanted Lieberman, was forced to chose Palin at the last minute after having met her only once and now all this news about her being investigated, her daughter's pregnancy etc. What did you expect the media to do?
The McCain campaign deserves to lose because they have run a horrible campaign and the media had nothing to do with it. They are not fit for the White House!!!

Grace Needed   September 3rd, 2008 1:40 pm ET

Two things have escaped the public's attention. Senator McCain said she had been properly vetted and even said the FBI did a background check and so far NOT one person has reported any evidence of either. IN fact, there is more evidence that HE LIED about the vetting and didn't even know the 17 year old was pregnant, let alone all the other news that has come to light. He took a big risk because he was agitated with what was happening to him again. He was losing, even after he went out on a limb with the whole surge idea that he insists succeeded. Succeeded in what we don't know yet. My family has lost all respect for Senator McCain. We supported him in 2000 and thought he was a real maverick, which he may have been more of at that time, but is certainly NOT anymore. The second issue which continues to dumbfound me, is how all these conservative right women would support a woman who is obviously NOT ready to be Vice President in any way. These are the same women who won't stand up for a woman in their pulpits, on their elder boards in their churches. The ONLY conclusion I can draw is they have been so repressed in their freedom of expression and opinions, that NOW they will jump at any chance to champion the cause of women's increased rights. Anyone who has supported "Family values" for the past number of decades has to know that more children die of poverty related issues in this world than anything else because their mothers didn't have access to birth control and weren't prepared for more children, to say nothing of teen pregnancies. I am glad that EVangelical leaders now have come to the conclusion that everyone makes mistakes and the child isn't the mistake and they can respond more forgiving and graciously, but what about providing for ALL the children of teen Moms, single Moms and impoverished Moms that don't have a wealthy, powerful family to support them. What would Jesus want us to do for them? Senator McCain is NO Christ follower. He cheated on his wife, left her for another, makes offensive remarks about his own wife and women who have been raped. He is NOT to be trusted and anyone who calls themself a Christian and would vote for him should seriously consider how they will account for their hypocrisy!!!

Gia in Los Angeles, CA   September 3rd, 2008 1:40 pm ET

Give me a break! It was purely a gimmick pick so that they could have a "historical" ticket (first female Republican on a ticket) to compete against Obama's historical ticket. Her extremist positions appeal to the far right, a blok needed by McCain to shore up the base. And, if they pick up some disaffected Hillary voters in the process, that's icing on the cake (even though her positions are totally opposite to Hillary's). McCain wanted to pick Lieberman, but kowtowed to the far right, because he knew he wouldn't have any chance of winning if he picked the much more qualified Lieberman.

FEMALE voter in PA   September 3rd, 2008 1:40 pm ET

watch O'Reilly interview Obama

Alan   September 3rd, 2008 1:40 pm ET

Pu-leese – Republicans have put in place the most vicious attack media network on the planet. Palin is arrogant/callous enough to put herself in the national spotlight despite all of her warts and now she doesn't want anyone to notice??? Well, the empress has no clothes!!!

Seth Cohen   September 3rd, 2008 1:40 pm ET

Ohh.... these questions are unfair! The media is no good! Whaaa.... someone took my binky... these Republicans are just like Bill Clinton... a sad state of affairs to be sure...

IndependentThinker, NY   September 3rd, 2008 1:40 pm ET

If you cant stand the heat get out of the kitchen

Obiden 08

jfs Memhis, Tn   September 3rd, 2008 1:40 pm ET

This is SPIN...............what do you think that the Republicans have done with Obama ? Have they not attempted to destroy The Dem nominee by accusing him of lacking experience??? Attacking his religion not to mention fasely accusing him of a non-Christian believe?? Pretraying Obama and his wife as unAmerican !!!! How dare they !!! What PHONIES. God gives back two-fold what has been shelled out !!!!!! This is just the beginning...........much more to follow. UNLESS, the McCain campaign gets to issues as opposed to unjustified attacks..........Nov. is going to be a Republican trouncing !

Ted   September 3rd, 2008 1:40 pm ET

What HYPOCRITE'S! After the attack add's on anyone and everyone Obama may have come across, after the attack ad's on his WIFE, they have the nerve….

I swear these republican hypocritical scumbags disgust me by the minute

YOu must have forgetton all your bS negetive ads against Obama. and he has NOt run even ONE negetive against her. like you did with Joe biden and your Gaff meter. on YOUR site. amazing

Jeff   September 3rd, 2008 1:40 pm ET

HAHAHHAHAHAHAHA, "We don't get enough press coverage". How's that working for you now?

Gail   September 3rd, 2008 1:39 pm ET

IS THIS TRUE, I'm counting on the investigative reporters to find the truth!
Sarah Palin is suing the Bush Administration over its decision last week to place the animal under the protection of the Endangered Species Act, claiming that climate models predicting the continued loss of sea ice – the main habitat of polar bears – are unreliable.The Governor of Alaska – a state whose residents overwhelmingly support oil exploration – Sources: TIMESONLINE, May 23, 2008
Is this the back door the Rep. are going totake to open ANWAR?

All the Kings Horses and All the Kings Men Couldn't Put Fallen Little Miss Ice Chip Together Again!   September 3rd, 2008 1:39 pm ET

She's self-destructing just fine on her own, thank you.

obama08   September 3rd, 2008 1:39 pm ET

First they complained about too little media coverage. Now they complain its too much. This is getting to be funny.

Xavier   September 3rd, 2008 1:39 pm ET

To be truthful, if you happened to click around the Sunday morning weekly news show, you would have seen a number of republican talking head including Giuliani equipped with the same talking points. These talking points were designed to draw in an inquisitive viewer and host then lash out at them with a comparison of Obamas accomplishments or lack there of. What they were not prepared to answer is 18 million voters agree that Obama has accomplished enough to be the leader of the free world while no one but McCain and his supporters believe this Gov of a state with 600,000 and a approval rating in the 60's is fit for the presidency.

Trang, Fremont, CA   September 3rd, 2008 1:39 pm ET

John McCain, because you didn't vet her properly, the media has too. Barack Obama had the same issue. Hillary Clinton raised this issue repeatedly, but Barack Obama was elected. We choose good judgment is far more important than years in Washington. His VP pick is good, I think.

John McCain, is contrast, despite his long years of experience, shows poor judgment in his VP pick. Picking his VP from one conversation? This is dangerous.

Jen   September 3rd, 2008 1:39 pm ET

If the McCain campaign can't take the heat, then they should get out of the kitchen.

Alice   September 3rd, 2008 1:39 pm ET

what's good for the goose is good for the gander - sorry, repubs!

Michael   September 3rd, 2008 1:39 pm ET

Beware of the Obama-aid. It tastes sweet going down but then it sours your stomach.

Entertained   September 3rd, 2008 1:39 pm ET

So the "Liberal Media" is run by the "Old Boys Network"???

Robert   September 3rd, 2008 1:39 pm ET

It is simply the opposite – The media is not scrutinizing her track record at all – instead of focussing on absolutely red herring issues such as abortion or teen pregnancy.

1. She denies that Global Warming is man made. She says the "science" that she has seen does not support it.

2. She is fighting the federal government on declaring the Polar Bear as endangered.

3. She used a lobbyist (a former Ted Stevens staff member) to wring out every last penny in pork barrel projects ensuring her county got more dollars than the city of Idaho

4. She was a governor of Alaska for winter when most of the state shuts down.

5. She believes in and encourages Creationism to be taught in schools.

Absolutely sickens me to the stomach that such a person could be the next president of this great country.

AJ   September 3rd, 2008 1:39 pm ET

Republicans will do anything (including whining about media) to defend their lousy VP choice. I can't believe McCain selected someone so immature, with hardly any experience in foreign affairs or economy (other than saying drill in ANWAR and running itsy-bitsy govt. of Alaska) to be heartbeat away from Presidency. All McCain wanted was to woo the evangelical right conservatives. From now till Nov. all we will hear when we question Palin on anything is either we are sexist or out there to destroy a first time woman republican VP choice. Why don't they talk about her extreme rightist conservative views on everything in life rather than whining??

john doe   September 3rd, 2008 1:39 pm ET

obama on fox new – o'reily...is this true?

Gene   September 3rd, 2008 1:39 pm ET

Republicans are nothing but whiners and hypocrites. Criticism is fine as long as it's directed at someone else. Well let's look at the record. John McCain is an admitted adulterer who applied for his marriage license to Cindy before he was officially divorced from his first wife Carol yet no one brings up that aspect of his character. Yet Bill Clinton had consensual "second base" sex with an adult woman and was impeached and nearly convicted. Now the "holier than thou" Sarah Palin wants to preach family values to us while her teenage daughter is getting pregnant. If she can't watch her daughter do you expect her to watch out for Al Qaeda?

TJ Gorton   September 3rd, 2008 1:39 pm ET

Do you want to talk scary, sense scaring people is the Republican way of getting elected:

-Sara Palin handling the Russian Georgia Crisis
-Sara Palin handling Iran's growing nuclear program
-Sara Palin even having an opinion about what we should do in Iraq

Sara Palin as VP and as President = Scary for America

I think this also says something about John McCain's judgement, in the sense that he didn't even know this person and didn't really vet Palin before putting her one heartbeat away from the Presidency. Is this how he's going to make other decisions?!?! Think about it.

carmen   September 3rd, 2008 1:39 pm ET

It was okay to equate Obama to Britney Spears, but when Britney's mom, dad and sister shows up in his house, any comment is a "plot" to destroy? I hope McCain keeps underestimating the intelligence of the average voter.

FrankB   September 3rd, 2008 1:39 pm ET

The fact is Sarah Palin, John McCain and the republicans have finally taken the wind out of the celebrity sails of the Obama camp, and they are scared. Barack said he had more experience because of the way he has run his campaign over the last 2 years with his 2500 workers and 12 million per month budget. Wake up Kool Aid drinkers. Palin is the Governor of a state with 77,000 state employees and a state budget of over 1 billion dollars. She has at least just as much experience as Barak and she was picked for the VP spot, not Presidential candidate. If McCain's pick was so bad, why are so many Obama supporters upset? They should applaud it. Maybe it's because the republicans have them wondering if they supported the wrong person.

JPD   September 3rd, 2008 1:39 pm ET

Dear CNN,

Please, please, please do not listen to this crap again. It's the media's job to ask tough questions of both parties. It's what you are supposed to do. If it's a non-issue, let the answers show that. Don't let them cow you into not asking in the first place.

The Republicans realized a long time ago that if they yelled long and hard about negative media attention, they wouldn't get negative media attention. They realized that they don't need to focus on policies, they only need to focus on media manipulation. Eventually, the democrats will realize the same thing, and then we won't have any substance to our politics at all. The only way to stop this cycle is for the media itself to call it what it is: whining and griping because they can't answer the questions you're asking.

Remember, if there is a fair chance to respond, then there is no such thing as an unfair question. Don't fall for this again. I'm begging you.

Adam   September 3rd, 2008 1:39 pm ET

Me thinks they doth protest to much

Phil, Ashburn, VA   September 3rd, 2008 1:38 pm ET

Repub's are arrogant and hypocrites. They use Obama's children for an AD and then say children are out of it. They attack Obama on experience then says, don't attack Palin. No way... we are tired of fear, war and bad economy. We need something new.

BK   September 3rd, 2008 1:38 pm ET

The media coverage of Gov. Palin is disgusting and a disgrace. If you didn't know CNN is for Obama, then you haven't been paying attention. Solidad OBrian has been hammering on her all morning. She is agruing with everyone that says anything good about her. Lets not leave out Campbell Brown, Anderson Cooper, David Gergen, Carville, and Bagalla. John King has also been very disappointing I always thought he was fair, not now. Then they let Roland Martin [Obama's attack dog] on there to continue the belittlement of Gov. Palin.

Someone should do something about this. I have never seen anything like this.

KH   September 3rd, 2008 1:38 pm ET

It is indeed sexist to believe that women should not be subject to as much scrutiny as a man.

Eric Ragle   September 3rd, 2008 1:38 pm ET

Questioning the Governor's qualifications is now considered sexist? When McCain isn't hiding behind his POW status, he hides behind the charge of sexism against Palin.

Enough.

Obama, 2008.

Ann for Obama/Biden   September 3rd, 2008 1:38 pm ET

Wow, who's whining now?

The media is not destroying Palin, she did that on her own. And am I supposed to believe she was thoroughly vetted? That's a laugh. Being a neighbor to Russia and Canada does not atomically qualify one as having international experience.

As a woman, I will not be voting for McCain/Palin, I will vote for Obama/Biden. I want this country to go forward, not backward. And that's what will happen if the Republicans win. If this happens, ladies, you can kiss your freedom to choose goodbye. Any chance of getting equal pay – not going to happen with McCain in charge. You want a Supreme Court that is balanced, McCain will make it an all conservative Court. Vets, you want benefits? Just look at his voting record, that speaks for itself.

If McCain had picked a qualified running mate in the first place, none of this would be happening. And if he thinks I'm going to vote for him just because he picked a female running mate, he's crazier than I thought. I'm NOT stupid.

Foreign Observer   September 3rd, 2008 1:38 pm ET

It's funny who the McCainers lean on to spread the news that the media are mean to them.... looks like it's the media. Lol.

Stef   September 3rd, 2008 1:38 pm ET

The squeaky clean Republican Party would never nominate someone without a perfect family. Someone lied and now they are all lying.

Ty   September 3rd, 2008 1:38 pm ET

Palin is parading her pregnant daughter and her boyfriend out tonight since it's polled well with her wingnut base.

McCain is mad because the press is asking questions that they cannot answer and leaving the pregnancy issue alone.

How many years are we going to put up with this nonsense?

Sorry Senator McCain but your VP pick's husband wanted to secede from the union. That's a pretty big question that needs to be addressed.

Alaska hillbilly   September 3rd, 2008 1:38 pm ET

How many pro-choice independent women and how many pro-choice Republican women will vote for the Republican vice president candidate?

Premos   September 3rd, 2008 1:38 pm ET

Sometime ago I remembered hearing that significant support for Hillary's came " uneducated " white voters. If this was true, Sarah should do quite well because people in this category of voters wouldnt know the difference between Hillary and Sarah. It would be really interesting to see who the " uneducated " white women support today.

dupont   September 3rd, 2008 1:38 pm ET

I'm curious about the campaign's unwillingness to speak in further detail on this "six month long in-depth vetting process" in light of the memo leaked to the press that they had only had one interview with her (two days prior to the announcement that she would be the VP nom), McCain had only met with her one week prior to choosing her (in his ridiculous hope that he might be able to bring Joe-Mentum on board), the people of her community and those areas which she governed in Alaska had heard NOTHING of her even being in the running (and had met no one from the campaign or been interviewed at all) and the FBI stating they hadn't had any sort of background check on Palin requested by the campaign.

What exactly was the campaign DOING for those six months?

The Smart Voter   September 3rd, 2008 1:38 pm ET

BTW....I love Campbell Brown! That was a totally legit interview she did. She was no way near aggressive as the Good Ol' boys club on Fox have been on dems. Isn't it crazy that anything questioning Palin is considered "sexist" by the republicans? It was said in many interviews but most notably between Carville(who was the biggest Clinton supporter) and a GOP congresswoman. So is anything questioning Obama "racist"? GOP you can't have it both ways

Michael   September 3rd, 2008 1:38 pm ET

Of course, because for them, there was going to be only one "different" golden boy this campaign season–Obama.

Once they destroyed Hillary, they thought it was over, they did not expect Palin. Now they are using her personal problems to tear her down, which, just might backfire given her problems are ones many Americans face.

Country First - Small town MA   September 3rd, 2008 1:38 pm ET

If Palin (both a mayor and a governor ) is unqualified to be vice president then how is the Community Organizer qualified to be president?

Unfortunately to the liberals of whom largely live in cities with a population of 100,000 or more, this country is a nation of Wasillas, not Chicagos.

Smells like the Dems are scared.

Mike   September 3rd, 2008 1:38 pm ET

Hypocrisy, thy name is GOP

It sounds to me like vetted Ms. Palin like they researched the invasion of Iraq. A quick sloppy affair made using dogma and ideology rather than fact and substance.

brad   September 3rd, 2008 1:38 pm ET

Welcome people. Our NEW CELEBRITY.

mark   September 3rd, 2008 1:38 pm ET

"exceptionalism" is not a real word.
Just saying...

Nicole In NE   September 3rd, 2008 1:38 pm ET

v.a., yes I had heard Sarah Palin saying that about Hillary too!

But if you're a PUMA, it's easy to pick and chose what facts you want. Thos people are seriously like a cult. scary

irena19   September 3rd, 2008 1:37 pm ET

Cambell Brown is amazing. She asked the questions that we all want to ask. McCain cant handle the heat and Carlson didnt know what to say because the answer wasnt in his talking points. This would never happen on Fox News. Cudos CNN....give that woman a raise.

I love how the Maverick caved in to the religious right and picks a staunch conservative when what he really wanted to do is pick Liberman. He is really standing up to them now. What a farce. He is just pandering and using this woman as a prop. Great job RNC.

SONGBIRD MCCAIN   September 3rd, 2008 1:37 pm ET

Who vetted her..the Onion?

Nice judgment, Songbird

Chris   September 3rd, 2008 1:37 pm ET

" six-month long rigorous vetting process " – ROFLLLL!!!!!

Where were they when the media was all over Obama's past???

or when they called Hillary a "whiner"???

What if Obama's daughter was pregnant???

Lynne - Seattle WA   September 3rd, 2008 1:37 pm ET

And this would be why the average American is sick to death of politics and politicians. The republicans have been ripping Obama a new one for months now...he doesn't have the experience, blah blah blah. Now that their VP is getting the same kind of coverage it's cause everyone else is sexist, or mean, or unamerican or some other line of whining.

The average American is tired of the "Do as I say not as I do" politics. Is it any wonder that so many people have tuned out on politics over the last several years???

Get over yourselves! President of the United States of America is a TEMP Job! The job is to serve us...not yourselves!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I plan to vote for Obama, but with all of this nonsense, I really am starting to think about voting for NONE OF THE ABOVE!

WHAT SCANDAL?   September 3rd, 2008 1:37 pm ET

I'm trying to find your Nader coverage here somewhere. Can you direct me to that link on your CNN website? This has about the same chance of getting posted as Pigs flying...

wow, they are in a v formation. Go you flying pigs, flee from the world of ham.

JT   September 3rd, 2008 1:37 pm ET

Actually, the people saying she wasn't vetted include Republican politicians and Palin's colleagues in Alaska. They've all said that no one spoke to them about Palin until after she was announced as the VP choice. Is the McCain campaign calling Alaska Republicans liars?

Bud   September 3rd, 2008 1:37 pm ET

I thought this was silly at first. However I now have come to the conclusion that I really do think the McCain campaign isn't going to let Palin talk outside of her stump speech until the debate. That will be the one and only time. Today: "McCain's strategy-Blame the media and cut off access."

The funny thing is if you read the news sites the daughter really isn't the issue today or anymore. There are serious questions about: the bridge to nowhere, earmarks, AIP affiliation, etc.

HunkyForJustice   September 3rd, 2008 1:37 pm ET

Did I miss something on Faux News??? Better go check my VCR recorder.

Lucy Windy Chicago, IL   September 3rd, 2008 1:37 pm ET

McCain is a baby. He wouldn't appear last night on Larry King because of questions asked by Campbell Brown to one of aids. All Brown wanted to know was about Palin's foreign policy experience. This is a complete fallacy because the McCain campaign is now trying to change the focus of the question asked. If you can't stay the heat get out of the kitchen.

Monica   September 3rd, 2008 1:36 pm ET

The real question of the day is.... Do they have statory rape charges in Alaska – and why haven't the court system picked up the charges like they do any other child under age, wether the mother likes it or not. It doesn't matter if they are getting married. She was under aged and the 18 year should be considered a rapist. Period.

As far as the REP party thinking that Palin was a good choice. NOT! If McCain really wanted to make a difference, he would have picked someone with moral and christian values – especially since that is what the REP party is always building their election on. And given the fact that it is know that McCain does not have any moral values, i.e., wikepedia shows facts that he not only was unfaithful to his wife, but he had an affair and then divorced his wife and before the ink dried on the paper, he married a woman for money.

Not a rumor – facts.

The one thing that make Obama stands out is not the color of his skin – it is the fact that he got money from the PEOPLE – who he is working for and not from all the OIL OR ENERGY COMPANIES.

That in itself shows that he is for all of us. We are so busy trying to take care of other countries, that we can't even TAKE CARE OF HOME.

WE THE PEOPLE SHOULD BE ASHAMED, JUST AS WE SHOULD HAVE BEEN ASHAMED TO LET BUSH AND HIS COUSIN IN FLORIDA GET AWAY WITH STEALING VOTES.

NOW IS THE TIME FOR ALL OF US TO FACE FACTS – WE ARE A DIVIDED NATION – AND UNTIL WE THE PEOPLE TAKE A STAND AGAINST GOVERNMENT AND SAY WE DON'T LIKE THE WAY YOU IGNORE AND TREAT OUR ISSUES AND CONCERNS, YOU WILL IN NO WAY BE ALLOWED TO BE VOTED INTO OFFICE.

WE ARE THE CHECKPOINTS OF OUR LIVES AND THE SECURITY OF OUR CHILDREN.

MAKE A DIFFERENCE – OBAMA IS TECHNICALLY BLACK BECAUSE OUR RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE ONE DROP OF BLOOD FROM SLAVERY DAYS SAY HE IS BLACK – BUT OBAMA IS NOT BLACK – HE IS A MIXTURE OF ALL OF US – HE IS A REPRESENTATIVE OF OUR MIXING POT.

VOTE TO LIVE, TO EAT, TO BE ABLE TO PAY YOUR BILLS AND STILL AT LEAST HAVE $20 IN YOUR POCKET WHEN IT IS ALL SAID AND DONE. VOTE FOR A FUTURE.

PUMA-PAC - Murphy   September 3rd, 2008 1:36 pm ET

Pepou September 3rd, 2008 12:15 pm ET

What is false about it ? That unknown entity Sarah whatever her name is is unqualified except for hunting moose.

You are correct! But the Repugs think the American people are too stupid to see through it! They think us American's are uninformed and may have missed those ads.

RH   September 3rd, 2008 1:36 pm ET

I love all the posters here conferring qualification on Palin by the mere use of the word. Could one of you make me a millionaire, please?

Karen from Charlottesville   September 3rd, 2008 1:36 pm ET

What I find interesting is that Palin's ambition allowed her to throw her own daughter under the bus for political gain. Her daughter is dealing with a most difficult crisis for a young woman and her mother chose to say yes to the VP slot, knowing that her daughter's unwanted pregnancy would become national news. Palin has not a shred of empathy for her daughter, and it shows. It's a pretty disgusting move from someone who puports to support FAMILY VALUES! What a bunch of hypocrits.

angry left from Michigan   September 3rd, 2008 1:36 pm ET

If Sarah Palin is so smart and so lovable and so qualified...she shouldn't be afraid of Campbell Brown. She should go on CNN immediately and tell the country about herself and her record. (baby!)

If she can't stand up to the press...How can we expect her to stand up to world leaders?

Molly Weasley   September 3rd, 2008 1:36 pm ET

John McCain didn't get his first VP pick, Joe Lieberman. Karl Rove wanted Mitt Romney and McCain refused. So McCain picked a VP he had met for all of 15 minutes, and the more we find out about her, the scarier she is.

Sarah Palin thinks the Iraq war is "a task from God."
She claims to be a reformer and to hate earmarks, yet she hired a lobbyist to seek $27 million federal dollars for a town of 6,000.
She claims she was against the "bridge to nowhere," yet she ran on that platform two years ago. And she kept the money in the earmark.
She thinks human beings had "nothing to do" with global warming.
She's in favor of banning books from public libraries.
She's against all abortions, even in the case or rape or incest.
She - and McCain - are in favor of abstinence-only sex education, even though study after study has shown that it doesn't work.
After promising to "cooperate thoroughly" in the ethics investigation over firing the Dept. of Public Safety official who refused to fire her ex-brother-in-law, she now claims executive privilege and refuses to testify (sounds just like the Bush administration!).

This has nothing to do with her gender or with her teenage daughter (who among us has not known a teenager who got pregnant?). I don't want someone with those kinds of beliefs and actions anywhere near the White House.

McCain has had a love affair with the media for years, even calling them "his base." Then abruptly, he cut off access when reporters started to ask actual questions, just as they are doing with Palin. So the McCain campaign has to go back to the tired whine about the "liberal media" who for once are actually doing their jobs. He has ruined his "straight-talk, maverick" brand with this VP pick by selling out to the religious right, whom he once referred to as agents of intolerance.

How dumb do they think the American people - especially American women - are?

Keith   September 3rd, 2008 1:36 pm ET

With Governor Palins as the commander in chief of the national guard and executive experience in Alaska, if she had run for President on the GOP ticket, do you think she would have won the nomination.

PUMA   September 3rd, 2008 1:36 pm ET

Obama is sexist, he doesn't support women rights...other than those for his wife and his two daughters...oh wait, that's not right, what am I supposed to say again Mr. Rove?

Phil in KC   September 3rd, 2008 1:36 pm ET

Well, they say the best defense is a good offense and that's pretty offensive. I don't think the media is out to destroy Palin. I think they're out to find the truth. If anyone destroys Palin, it will be Palin herself. They keep coming back to her history of governing and that it beats Obama's. That's just an open lie they're trying to sell as the truth. He has served more time in office representing more people and has a more impressive background in education and public service. I hope the American public is not stupid enough to fall for this garbage.
Now – how about the issues? The economy? The War in Iraq? The housing market and fuel prices? How about a ballooning debt that can be laid directly at the feet of the Republicans? Let's talk about those things.

Theo   September 3rd, 2008 1:36 pm ET

Hey gang,
None of you, including Campbell Brown, has a clue what Sarah Palin is all about. Can you at least listen to her speech tonight before you make judgments? Campbell, can you please go get the american people some information we can use in judging her ourselves instead of this drivel spewing from your ignorant mouth. Do your job for a change. Jeeez!

Martha   September 3rd, 2008 1:36 pm ET

I am a mother with 5 daughters and 2 sons. I have always believed in putting my children above everything including my career. I worked when I had to so that they could eat. I turned down promotions that would have taken me away from the home for more than those 9 hour days, especially during the teen years when their emotions are out of whack. I am not even close to being rich (5 million according to McCain) but we are living comfortable. I had another baby at 41 years old and now my total focus is my younger 2 children. (The older 5 are grown and on their own). I am appalled that a mother would subject her teenage pregnant daughter to the limelight the way Gov Palin did just to further her career. Fortunately my baby was born without any problems and still, I am so consumed in him that I will not leave him for more than a couple of hours. Gov Palin should have told McCain, I deeply appreciate the offer but I cannot accept because my children need me more.

brian   September 3rd, 2008 1:36 pm ET

I love obama fans you guys make me laugh

Luis Suarez   September 3rd, 2008 1:36 pm ET

Everyone seems to be talking about how Sarah Palins executive experience as a governor and a mayor makes her ready to lead this great nation. Well i do not see how anyone could have missed the obvious. President Bush also had executive experience that he brought with him from his days as governor of the state of Texas and look how terrible things turned out for America.

Mo, NC   September 3rd, 2008 1:36 pm ET

I know it'll happen...everytime she gets criticized, it's going to be labeled as sexism; i see this as Palin being exposed as the unqualified VP candidate that she is! It has been said before that if she can't handle the heat then get out of the kitchen! Welcome to the big leagues, Sarah! McCain cannot say with a straight face that she is the most qualified person to be his running mate. Everything that the media is covering now SHOULD have been more heavily considered during the "vetting" process! Having said all of that, I can't wait for Biden to RESPECTFULLY eat her alive during the debates!

Last Honest Man   September 3rd, 2008 1:36 pm ET

Democrats and the media are good for one thing and one thing only sandbags.

CB   September 3rd, 2008 1:36 pm ET

She was a shot-gun choice because her name is Sarah and not Sam. Everybody knows she was picked because she was a woman. Okay, now she's here. And we're not supposed to ask tough questions?

Does she know the difference between Shiite and Sunni? What are her plans to broker a peace deal between Isreal & the Palenstinians? What are her views on the use of nuclear weapons? How will she handle the genocide in Darfur?

Let's start there shall we???

mistermister   September 3rd, 2008 1:35 pm ET

Hey, if you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen!

This type of treatment is nothing like what you can expect as leader of the freeworld.

Grow some spine, for christs sake.

Even Steven   September 3rd, 2008 1:35 pm ET

Haahahhaha, this is hilarious. Unreal. This entire last four or five days has been a completely bizarre, surreal circus. And the GOP have the gall to blame the media, the DNC, the entire world wide web, the illuminati, martians, Russian spies, and whoever else they can flail around against except themselves for choosing a person who they HAD to know would create a political firestorm. They HAD to know, right? Scary...

HD   September 3rd, 2008 1:35 pm ET

With her on the cover of two magazines and daughter Bristol with bf, Levi, at the plane waiting for McGrandpa to land, why are they yelling for 'privacy'?

It seems to me they want it both ways.

This is America, John. We want to know our candidates and we have every right to do so. Just because you didn't do a thorough job...

You seem very tempermental. Your judgement to not appear on Larry King last night showed a lot about your personality.

Memyself&I   September 3rd, 2008 1:35 pm ET

Funny how six months ago when this lady was asked to comment on Hillary's complaining about the "sexist media coverage she was getting", Palin said that Clinton was just "whining"... lol.

Is that the pot calling the kettle black ?

Benson   September 3rd, 2008 1:35 pm ET

Yes, Chip we liberals have a lot of nerve to want to know who we are voting for or against. YES, you better believe Sarah has to be vetted. What planet do you live on?

no more lies   September 3rd, 2008 1:35 pm ET

PROVE what you lie about palin, repugnants! LOL

she'll withdraw or get rightfully destroyed, before the election day!

Ron   September 3rd, 2008 1:35 pm ET

Bashing? Perhaps the media wouldn't continue to question Palin's nomination if the McCain campaign would provide straight forward answers to questions. A perfect example was the exchange between CNN's Campbell Brown and Tucker Eskew. During the exchange, Tucker made a reference to Sarah Palin having more executive experience than Barack Obama. Campbell asked Tucker for an example to demonstrate Palin's executive experience. Tucker dodged the question which resulted in the McCain campaign accusing Campbell Brown of attacking Tucker Eskew. PLEASE!!! The truth is that Tucker didn't have an example of a Palin executive decision because he didn't know enough about her. I would suggest to the McCain campaign to do some homework, honestly answer the questions, and quit making excuses for their own information gaps.

Zoomer   September 3rd, 2008 1:35 pm ET

It is amazing the number of times I see name-calling on this blog using the Hypocrite title. I guess it is easier to do name-calling and citing obscure facts in support. The bottom line is:
1. The National Media proports themselves to be mainstream America while at the same time praising one woman (Hilary Clinton) for being aggressive and proactive and at the same time castigating another woman (Sarah Palin) with the same attributes.
2. Contributors on this blog basically follow the same pattern. They praise one candidate (Obama) for bringing a fresh, new approach to solving our country's problems when in fact he has little or no leadership experience while trying to destroy the credibility of another candidate (Palin) based on the same basis. Actually, Gov. Palin's experience is more applicable considering she has held the positions of chief executive officer in two different organizations.
3. Therefore, if the truth be known, the National Media is biased and far to the left politically of mainstream America and wishes to shape public opinion in like manner. The liberal faction of this country find that name-calling and taking information out of context is easier than identifying a logical, concrete basis for their arguments. It is time for both groups to become honest.....................

Gail AL.   September 3rd, 2008 1:35 pm ET

This is a disgrace the way the media is playing Palin. The Obama campaign is so disturbed about this pick, and they have the right to be. Women who voted for Hillary are looking for a candidate, and she's the one, she's tough like Hillary. After her speech tonight the people will love her. She's a reformer, and that's what we need, somebody to shake up Washington, maybe give Pelosi alittle shake. their scarred of all the votes they are going to lose, and it's going to be plenty. Didn't think MCcain would make a move like this but sure glad he did.

Rose   September 3rd, 2008 1:35 pm ET

Palin doesn't need the media to destroy Palin-she has herself.

Reggie   September 3rd, 2008 1:35 pm ET

Smalltown NC you are not a Hilary supporter you are racist Rep. You would rather defend a lady you never heard of than support Obama who has made it clear that he and Hilary share the same ideas. Even she admits it. Good luck fight off your personall problems but keep Hilary out of it. Do some research on this lady you have only known of her for 5 days and ready to trust her. Shameful and racist.

Marie in California   September 3rd, 2008 1:35 pm ET

Of course the DNC, Obama and the MSM want to destroy Palin. They're in a panic because, first of all, they were caught off guard and broadsided by McCain's VP choice. They also know they are now going to lose the election to McCain. They're really not sure what to do about all that, so they're clutching at straws and grabbing onto every flimsy and inconsequential thing they can about Palin. They're like little spinning tops going every which way.

While they're at it....why don't they grab onto something substantial, like Obama's years of cozying up to the dirty Chicago political machine, his lack of experience (actually, less than Palin's in terms of quality and accomplishment), and his seemingly endless list of questionable and tainted personal as.sociations.

While Palin is like a breath of fresh Alaskan air, Obama is more like inhaling a bunch of dirty smog.

McCain-Palin – 2008

Luis   September 3rd, 2008 1:35 pm ET

Ignorant Liberals....tricks are for kids........

Vote McCain or join the insane.....

Pat   September 3rd, 2008 1:35 pm ET

Just read on the internets that Sarah Palin's pastor said those who criticize President Bush are bound for hell.

Kyle in San Diego, CA   September 3rd, 2008 1:35 pm ET

Such hypocrites.

Billy   September 3rd, 2008 1:35 pm ET

What is disgusting her Palin's record of:

Firing anyone who voices dissension in her administration,
Leaving a town of 6,00 with tens of millions of dollars in debt,
Securing ten of millions of dollars in pork projects for a town of 6,000,
Attending a conference and having a husband that supports Alaska secession,
abusing your power as a governor,
lying about your opposition to the bridge to nowhere because it is politically expedient.
the list goes on and on.

None of this reflects on her personal life... ALL of this reflects on her capacity to act as a leader for this country.

Palin is extremist and dangerous to America.

Glen   September 3rd, 2008 1:35 pm ET

I hear so much about Obama's experience, would somebody please say what experience he has had? Real facts – not wishful thinking. Even Reid said that the press was gender biased, why should they change? It seems Dem female commentators hate the thought of a women more successful than themselves. The Dems have chosen the same old, same old Washington insiders. That old men's club – boringly predictable.

Zman   September 3rd, 2008 1:35 pm ET

Hey your and her should have thaught about it before you put here there. You had more than six months to do all that.
Seriously If you can not take the heat get out of the kitchen.

Cindy   September 3rd, 2008 1:35 pm ET

Why is it that this women can thforce her values on other people that my not have the same value is that not what america is about?
Not to mention she had to be preg. before she was married on 08/29/1988 because her son was born 04/20/1989 what happen no sex she is just another HIPOCRIT.

warren sanford   September 3rd, 2008 1:35 pm ET

I find it amusing that statutory rape is just fine with the GOP in this case...it seems like yesterday a black kid spent 3 years in jail while we debated this same question-where was the safe sex instuction-Levi could have just as quickly could have given bristol HIV-or clamidia-hockey stars rarely can eat just one. The gop have been beating us over the head with family values-Levi should be in jail and Bfristol should be with CPS. This Palin woman disgusts me.

Fischer   September 3rd, 2008 1:34 pm ET

Americans have every right to know what ticket they will be voting for. If the Gov Palin was not properly vetted, it is only fair that the media scrutinizes her as has been done to the Obama, Biden and McCain. We have to know what we are getting ourselves into as a country. She will be a heartbeat away from the presidency. So I think that it is only fair that we get to know her better so as to make an informed choice.

Rose   September 3rd, 2008 1:34 pm ET

I agree the media has a right to ask the tough questions, what they don't have a right to do is print or say something that is not a proven truth. The media wants facts from the candidates and then they report them in a skewed manner and this goes for all of the media. The smear tactics by the media are terrible and just speculation on their part. I thought it was the job of the media to report the news not their opinions.

Independence   September 3rd, 2008 1:34 pm ET

'faux media scandal' OR actually FOX MEDIA SCANDAL. We all seen how FOX came with all the imaginary comments about Michelle Obama, Smear about Obama. Now all the media is telling the truth about McCain campaign with some twist but McCain doesn't like it. He should known bettwr, What goes around, comes around.

Obama/Biden '08   September 3rd, 2008 1:34 pm ET

I guess internet smears and rumors aren't so fun when you're on the receiving end, huh old man?

Ben   September 3rd, 2008 1:34 pm ET

i think this sexism cry is complete and utter hypocrisy. if obama labeled the mccain camp and other republicans as racist every time his experience was questioned, he'd have been thrown off the stage and blasted for throwing the race card. after attacking obama's experience for months, palin's experience is fair game and rightly worthy of media attention. these cries of sexism serve to promote nothing other than a smoke screen to mask a true vetting a VP candidate. it's a disgrace

Anne in CT   September 3rd, 2008 1:34 pm ET

Well McCain is right. Why is the media vetting Sarah Palin when they should researching whether or not McCain has seen a mental health professional lately? Shame on John McCain for putting our very lives in danger by choosing this neophyte with ultra-limited scruples to inherit the Presidency, and shame on the GOP for not stepping in and putting an end to this farce.

YellowDog   September 3rd, 2008 1:34 pm ET

Oh, Please, Republicans!
It was obvious from watching the news yesterday that the "strategy" is to loudly proclaim "SEXISM!" every single time that Gov. Palin is the subject of criticism. They are trying to inoculate her against any serious scrutiny by making everyone afraid to talk about her in anything but glowing terms.
And this from the same party who has constantly harped that Obama is too inexperienced to lead. Are they trying to create a "sexism card"? This trivializes gender discrimination by implying that a female candidate cannot be criticized.
And what about the same hard look at her church as Obama's church? Look it up, folks. McCain would be the oldest President ever inaugurated. Palin could possibly become President . ... Heaven help us.

chris   September 3rd, 2008 1:34 pm ET

in a country with falling test scores, a declining education system, where American Idol is the top-rated show and george w. bush was elected twice as our "leader", it should not be a surprise that we faced with the choice for President between an inexperienced hypocrite and an aging, angry man......

dlg   September 3rd, 2008 1:34 pm ET

I have to say that Ms. Palin does not act like a great mom. Watched her with one of her little girls and the baby tried the whole time to stay with her mom during a campaign. Mom never even looked down and acknowledged the child. I would have been freaking that I had a small child in that crowd. Her oldest daughter is pregnant and Palin has a baby that needs her. It doesn't appear that she is handling her family and her job well. I would not normally care because many of us work, but being governor or vice president is different and takes your whole life. If this is family values then I don't think I like it. I agree, she should think of this later, when her children are bigger and don't need her as much. But who cares about the children. Michelle Obama does work, but she won't be president or vice president and will be able to be the primary parents at present. I do think it matters.

Lester Breisblatt   September 3rd, 2008 1:33 pm ET

Thou does protests too much, me thinks. Palin is a bigger lemon than the Edsel, but a perfect representation of the extreme right wing that runs the Republican Party.

bill   September 3rd, 2008 1:33 pm ET

Do not be discouraged, all those who read these hateful comments. Hate for Bush has galvanized an "anybody but" mentality. We need to continue to just ask the question to most Americans who seek balance and are center right. Does the prospect of the two furthest left Senators governing with a compliant congress not send this country in a very scary direction , and do so in the fast lane.

John McCain is a great , proven leader that can work with a Dem congress and will not allow the gridlock to continue, but do so with two sides comming to agreement on public policy. The truth and the correct path, as I think most agree, usually lies somewhere in the middle.

I do not fear his inexperience, Obama is a very persuasive, effective politician, I do have nightmares about what he would do, how fast, and how permanent the effects would be of all the socialistic programs he would institiute.

Please take a real look at Sarahs speech tonight before you Judge, and please follow your heart as to looking at John MCCains proven record of leadership.

jim   September 3rd, 2008 1:33 pm ET

I keep hearing the GOP talking about respecting Bristol Palin's privacy...

According to the judges that McCain or Palin would appoint... Americans do not have a right to privacy. Period.

Shaw   September 3rd, 2008 1:33 pm ET

I'd be upset too if I were John McCain. How dare the media see through my blatantly chauvinistic attempt to win women voters simply by putting a woman on the ticket?

Oh wait, or was I bending over backwards to appeal to evangelicals by choosing someone who believes creationism should be taught in schools and who doesn't believe in global warming or that there should be exceptions to abortion restrictions for the special cases of rape or incest. Most independent women agree with those positions, right?

Maybe I just need to have her pray for me. After all, her pastor said Kerry supporters in '04 couldn't be saved and that Iraq is a divine war...

b. Krause   September 3rd, 2008 1:33 pm ET

Fascinating! When it ain't O'Reilly, Hannity, or Limbaugh speaking, it's the media's fault. Forget the facts. Neglect the truth (banning books, support for aerial hunting of wolves, support for the teaching of "Creation science.") This is a step backward, not forward. Please, God, don't test us, again, with this illiterate "babe" (as Limbaugh so aptly put it). We don't deserve it another series of the darkest years in American history with this group at the helm.

Bobby Kennedy Was Right   September 3rd, 2008 1:33 pm ET

"Things are moving so fast in race relations a Negro could be president in 40 years. There's no question about it, in the next 40 years a Negro can achieve the same position that my brother has. Prejudice exists and probably will continue to, but we have tried to make progress." –Bobby Kennedy

IAMWMD   September 3rd, 2008 1:33 pm ET

We have only touched the surface of Palingate. No matter what the repugs do to delay her investigation, the Dems will wait until Nov 1st to let the truth come out and it's gonna all but destroy the repug party.

Obama o8

real change   September 3rd, 2008 1:33 pm ET

to all the people who say the media needs to scrutinize obama as well need to read more.....the american public isnt going to just elect someone because the mccain camp says they vetted them, this is a serious job, every media outlet should be looking into all of these peoples past and that is what they are doing....it just so happens that obama, mccain, and biden have gone through so much scrutiny that its just beating a dead horse, instead of crying foul mccain needs to welcome people who question her on the positions, this is about the issues after all!

ed   September 3rd, 2008 1:33 pm ET

as governor of arkansas, how was bill clinton better qualified to be president than the governor of alaska is to be vice-president?

COL. ROBERT KAHN   September 3rd, 2008 1:33 pm ET

THE FACT HER DAUGHTER GOT KNOCKED UP IS IRRELEVANT. THE FACT THAT SHE IS NOT EXPERIENCED NOR QUALIFIED TO BE THE VP AND POSSIBLY THE PREZ IS DEDFINITELY RELEVANT.

Proud to be American   September 3rd, 2008 1:33 pm ET

There is more wrong with McCain pick then there is good and with her being only a heart beat away from the Presidential seat (especially with McCain health issues) do you think he put his Country first? Now with all the other issues she has (not talking about her children's issues) I would think not.... I think he went for shock and awe and now I am just in awe :0(

Obama & Biden 2008

Anonymous   September 3rd, 2008 1:33 pm ET

Palin never called Hillary voters A bunch of whiners.. You lie just to make Palin look bad. You obama's lover tell one thing Obama did good ? He is fraud and bla bla bla and noting else. NO Obama NO obama.

BCH   September 3rd, 2008 1:33 pm ET

Everything about Obama and his family was splashed across the nation. Now its Palin turn. If she can't take the heat, then get out of the kitchen or in her case, head back to her own kitchen. By the way, if she is out for her ex-brother-in-laws job, what would she do or is capable of doing if she is allowed to become the second most prowerful person in the world or most powerful since McCain can't read , remember, talk, just old.

chuck   September 3rd, 2008 1:33 pm ET

Still laughing today. Haven't stopped since the nominee was announced. The fact that McCain chose this person shows how out of touch the Republicans are. As a democrat who has alot of republican friends, they are confused also. Just can't stop laughing.

ALECO -----NOKOMIS,FL   September 3rd, 2008 1:33 pm ET

SARAH PALIN SHOULD DROP OUT OF THE RACE.

Darrell Hitchens   September 3rd, 2008 1:33 pm ET

The real scandal here is that Sarah Palin is a trooper. A real team player who plays by the rules and who contributes to the common cause of the ultra-conservatives of the Republican Party. She is a trooper who is being used by John McCain for painfully obvious reasons to include vapidity, vanity and vacuous intent. She is a working mom, who will short-change her children to get what she wants. John McCain will sacrifice her for what he wants. Ultimately, her children and husband will suffer as a result of the lies put forth by John McCain and his campaign. Karl Rove is right. This attempt to dupe the public and create a wedge candidate is doomed to fail. It is becoming apparent that she, being the good trooper and team player that she is, will be sacrificed to perpetuate a lie. That John McCain actually cares for the concerns of women and their stake in the political process and in society in general Does this scenario remind us of anything? Sure! The 4500 or so troopers whose lives have been sacrificed to perpetuate the lies that were told by the Bush Administration 5 years ago to get us into Iraq. There is no limit to the subterfuge that McCain and Bush will resort to get what they want. What a tangle web we weave. If women vote for this ticket solely for feminist reasons, they will get exactly what they deserve....one step forward and three steps back.

Dandelion.   September 3rd, 2008 1:32 pm ET

"Governor Sarah Palin is an exceptional governor with a record of accomplishment that exceeds, by far, the governing accomplishments of Senator Obama"

Notice how they keep pushing this theory? It's absolute bull! This is what we call "the big lie", it's a propaganda tool. They think if they say something enough we'll start believing it. We have had eight years of them doing this to us. EIGHT YEARS. Enough! We're not going to fall for it anymore.

Eight years is ENOUGH!

Obama/Biden 08!

joe   September 3rd, 2008 1:32 pm ET

I agree family first, she chose politics over her family. And her family is fair game. When running on a platform, that could care less about our own family. Just stay out of our family business. And let us choose what is right and wrong. Not the goverment, enough said.

DrMan   September 3rd, 2008 1:32 pm ET

Oh how two-faced you libs are....When a woman is running for a lib position it's great, but when a woman is running on the republican side it's "get back in the kitchen and take care of your family!". It just shows how pathetic libs are.

Bill in Ct.   September 3rd, 2008 1:32 pm ET

Do you right wing people and republican have any brains, why is it ok for you idiots to attack Obama on any and everything you can come up with but when someone ask a question about Palin the moose eater, their attacking her, their sexist, and the media is bias, please give me a break. The only reason the right wing republicans are so hostile about her is because theres something there their trying to hide so what they do is, turn the question into some kind of attack on her so people can feel sorry for her. You idiots can't have it both ways. And by the way " WHO IS SHE "

Amanda & Adrian for Obama   September 3rd, 2008 1:32 pm ET

They all brought it on themselves by picking her. As a matter of fact, ANY person picked will be subject to scrutiny. Any skeletons in her closet are fair game.

James   September 3rd, 2008 1:32 pm ET

I can only speak for myself, but the media did not drive my disdain for McCain's veep pick, it came quite naturally. For someone who wants to be bi-partisan, he picked an under-qualified neo-can to stand beside him on the ticket. When I saw the post online last Friday of Palin's selection, my first reaction was to tell a co-worker. He, a lifelong republican, was the first to utter the words, " What is McCain thinking?" I have since met dozens of likely McCain voters who said they will sit out or vote Obama because of this foolhardy decision by McCain. This "double-down" on Palin will send McCain home broke, and American will be better off.

John, Virginia   September 3rd, 2008 1:32 pm ET

Obama is an empty suit compared to Sarah Palin. What is a community organizer? When did he ever stand up and vote for a key issue in the Illinois legislature?

Chris   September 3rd, 2008 1:32 pm ET

So republicans can trash Obama and his wife but Campbell Brown can't ask a valid question "Tell me one thing Palin has done to qualify her as Commander and Chief" and Tucker could not even answer than. How pathetic?

If this is McCain's first decision as a presidential candidate, then we are all doomed.

david   September 3rd, 2008 1:32 pm ET

She''s definitely McCain''s girl if she spent big on lobbyists!

She was for the bridge to nowhere before she was against it.

She made Alaskans happy with a fat oil dividend check. What Republican can’t spend money from a fat government wallet?

She thinks creationism and abstinence-only education should be taught in schools. We see the results of the latter right now in real time.

This is a soap opera that will continue to engross and amaze most of America, just like a weekly episode of American Idol.

Can"t we just have good, qualified people and rational policy? Does everything in America have to be such a drama?

anne   September 3rd, 2008 1:32 pm ET

McCain Camp is creating its own scandal.

chris   September 3rd, 2008 1:32 pm ET

how sad that so many have chosen to compromise the best interests of their children, our troops and America by supporting lesser candidates (mccain/obama) to take on the daunting and overwhelming issues that the next President will face.....

kells   September 3rd, 2008 1:32 pm ET

will someone please post the story about Bristol Pailin and her underage drinking?? and kissing girls??? why hasnt that hit the news yet???????????

ProudNYCDemocrat   September 3rd, 2008 1:32 pm ET

Please.

Democrats have had to put up with the "journalists" on Fox News who have done everything they can to distort the facts and truth for years.

Now that Republicans (and their choices) are being scrutinized by other media outlets-FAIRLY–it's appalling to see how they, once again, try and distort reality.

It's very interesting that the McCain camp decides to take the low road because real journalists are asking challenging questions of the McCain camp.

Palin has VERY LITTLE experience - and she's a heartbeat away from the Presidency (especially given McCain's age and bouts with cancer).

It's completely fair for journalists, like Campbell Brown, to raise questions about her experience.

As a Democrat and former-Hillary-turned-Obama supporter, I could not be more thrilled with McCain's choice.

There is absolutely NO way any intelligent, pro-Hillary woman in this country would ever be swayed by this ridiculous display of pandering.

And as for any other woman in this country who cares about her reproductive rights? I can only guess that the majority will not buy into this ticket.

If not for that, for many of the other wonderfully scary things Palin brings to the table-like her thinking it's OK to teach creationism in public schools.

Maddie, Hartford, Ct.   September 3rd, 2008 1:32 pm ET

I am so sick of hearing about the "old boys network!"....anyone who questions Palin's capability is sexist? This woman's ideals and preachings would set the female population back four decades.

Democrat is the only way   September 3rd, 2008 1:31 pm ET

Stop complaining about the Media. Just try too win and deal with the environment in which this is taking place. It will not change so who cares.

Obama has won this thing anyways. Sit down and zip it

Brian   September 3rd, 2008 1:31 pm ET

All the statements that have been floating around the last couple of days regarding that she shouldn't run because of her new born, is just plain sexist and demeaning to all women. Since when does a woman have to stay home and not run for public office because of a special needs baby. We would not and have not made that same remark to any man that has run for office so why is this even being brought up? As for the media going after her daugher because of the pregnancy is just plain wrong. Back in the 90s they had a total hands off philosophy regarding Chelsea, and for the most part they have left Bush's twin daughters alone. What ever happend that the kids are off limits? What the media is doing is a disgrace with the way they are treating this young woman.

And the coverage of of Palin has been a disgrace overall. They are trying to make mountains out of things that are just not there all because she never made the sunday talk show circuit and they feel left out. She has been put under more scrutiny in the last week than what other politicians have over the last year, so yes there has been a complete double standard when it comes to her.

And for some of these leftists blogs that are throwing out rumors and hyberbole with no basis in facts should be ashamed of themselves and we should hold any politician that goes and supports these people in the future to account for the way that they are acting.

Thomas Baird   September 3rd, 2008 1:31 pm ET

If you cant take the media coverage heat get out of the kitchen.

Dave in OC, Vets for Obama   September 3rd, 2008 1:31 pm ET

McCain campaign says: "The McCain campaign will have no further comment about our long and thorough process. This nonsense is over. .The American people get to do the vetting now on Election Day – November 4th."

I sense they're going to be answering a lot more questions about the former Miss Alaska Runner-up.

Vets for Obama!

PatrickMN   September 3rd, 2008 1:31 pm ET

BOO-HOO... Welcome to the big time Governor!

David from Delaware   September 3rd, 2008 1:31 pm ET

Typical. A campaign or a public official gets critical comments in the media and they blame media bias. Lets face it. "McGain" and "Pale-in" just don't have it! John's a bonified war hero. That's his only claim to fame. He's done NOTHING notable in his years in the Senate other than jump from ship to ship to benefit his own ego. Senator McCain's vetting process was a failure, in my view. If he did that poorly there, just think of how he'd run the country. Sorry, but Madame Governor just scares me to death. A beauty queen/TV weathercaster turned politician from a town of 6,900 and a state with 633,000 or so people ! It's state gem is Jade, so call me jaded. Give me a break !

Chris   September 3rd, 2008 1:31 pm ET

The hypocrisy in the media is incredible.

Where are the stories on Joe Biden's sons being involved in a hedge fund scandal? Why haven't we heard ad nauseum quotes of Biden's ethnic slur regarding people of Indian descent?

The media is engaged in a a quadruple standard.

First double-standard : the media would never go this hard against a Democrat.

Second double-standard : the media would never go this hard against a man. One NBC reporter (a female even) actually asked a McCain aide yesterday how Palin would be able to care for her Down-syndrome child if she became VP. Could you imagine them asking a man that question.

But keep on going after her. First of all, it will blow up in your face. Second of all, I think you picked the wrong item to take on in a fight. Palin is going to blow everyone away tonight.

An observer on Aruba   September 3rd, 2008 1:31 pm ET

If you're a journalist, you have to figure out where the news might hide. No shot means no hit. If it's about your candidate, SHAME!, but if it is about the opposition: WELL DONE!

Give me a break!

You have to determine for yourself if it's news to you yes or no. Republicans want to take care of themselves and think for themselves. Well, here you have it.

You think you know the news is not significant? Well, leave it slide.

You think that not all people are capable of sound judgment? Well, you don't suppose to be vote for a republican, because the GOP wants you to figure things out for yourself.

I watched the DNC closely and feel they all (whoever you are) are ready to make a difference. It's the most diverse and optimistic people i have seen in a long long time.

Now I'm following the RNC and discover exactly the opposite. GOP and GOP only seems to be the message. The most undiverse crowd I have ever seen.

Ambrose Smith, Borrego Springs, California   September 3rd, 2008 1:31 pm ET

McCain warned Palin this would happen.

So why are they SHOCKED??

McCain threw Palin under the bus and Palin threw Bristol under the bus.

Vincent Spaulding   September 3rd, 2008 1:31 pm ET

McCain thought he could slip Palin into the limelight without scrutiny? When has that ever worked for anyone? McCain's critical mistake in drafting Palin was his last minute, utter compliance with the extreme right wing of his party. Sure, he's strengthening his position with them by using a completely spun up version of Palin's image, but he's losing the rest of the voters with that strategy. The MSM deserve some credit as it points out Palin's strengths and weaknesses to a public that does not know her. The media are justified is what they are doing and the rest of us are justified in wanting to know someone who might be the next VP. McCain and company are sore because Palin is coming up short in the view of most voters.

Franky   September 3rd, 2008 1:31 pm ET

I agree with some of you, the mccain camp is trying to hide something real bad. Why else did they send a team to alaska. I hope the media uncovers the dirt before the mccain team gets a chance to burry it.

Go MEDIA go !!

Never give up !!

ILIndependent   September 3rd, 2008 1:31 pm ET

OK, wait ... so now the GOP is accusing the MSM of being an Old Boys' Network about Palin? This just keeps getting weirder and weirder ... the Republicans are like a new vegetarian of three days that cannot believe that you still eat animals. How could you!?!?

McCant   September 3rd, 2008 1:31 pm ET

Who cares about the faltering economy; this woman is a qualified moose-killer with her own gramma-daughter! That's a great reason to vote for someone!

Kathy   September 3rd, 2008 1:31 pm ET

Now the Republicans are getting a taste of what they have been dishing out about Obama. Doesn't taste good, does it?

Brian   September 3rd, 2008 1:31 pm ET

McCain 08 = McCain First
Palin 08 = Alaska First
Country = Somewhere down the list

Ugh   September 3rd, 2008 1:31 pm ET

As someone said earlier, "Turnabout is fair play".

We've spent years and especially the last several months listening to the Repubelicans attack Hillary, guess what, its Sarah's turn. Guess what? Sarah professes abstinence for your family, BUT NOT HER OWN. Hypocricy is news. You Repubes can't complain when the mirror is shoved in your face. Deal with it. I'm so glad you are on the offensive. Palin is the worst and best mistake McCain has made. I'm eating up every single minute of this disaster.

Hey Sarah, what does the VP do? Absorbs the brunt of media scrutiny while filling the pockets of her friends.

Matthew   September 3rd, 2008 1:31 pm ET

Oh please. The McCain camp has become a joke to the point of absurdity. This is the beginning of the end, you watch. The first person Obama should thank after his win in November is McCain for making this HORRIBLE VP decision.

Jay   September 3rd, 2008 1:30 pm ET

Molly – Cambell never said anything about her being a mother, She wanted to Know what Palin has done? He had no answer but to say she was better then Obama...PROVE IT!

Steven Hammond   September 3rd, 2008 1:30 pm ET

I supported John McCain back in the 2000 election. I am now backing Barack Obama. I am tired of the GOP trying to influence my vote my making me feel guilty if I don't vote for John McCain because he is a war hero. My Uncle was killed in world two when they threw a bomb into his army tank, he got no recognition. He was one of the many fallen hero's that could have been a leader in our country today. It's time we open our eyes up to what the GOP are trying to do. As for as Sarah Palin I have to say she cannot compare to Senater Joe Biden, very easy decision on VP PICK. I hope voters will see that we are being feed fear tactics again.

Steven,
Kentucky

chris   September 3rd, 2008 1:30 pm ET

surprise, surprise, the obama lemmings are being sexist again....

Jay, Raleigh, NC   September 3rd, 2008 1:30 pm ET

The media is doing it's job. If McCain had done his job and properly vetted Palin, he would not have this problem. McCain has decided that it's better to play like his campaign is some kind of victim.

What's McCain's response going to be when he encounters real world problems in office? Can we expect more baseless complaining and more poorly planned cabinet-level appointments?

Palin is no different than Harriet Myers. Both were picked exclusively based on their gender and their fringe political and religious ideology.

Competence had nothing to do with either pick.

Harrisburg, PA   September 3rd, 2008 1:30 pm ET

Poor Poor Republicans. The fact is that the media isn't trying to "trash" McSame's choice for VP because she's a woman, the media is doing its job, to find out the truth about a person who could be (hope not!) a heartbeat away from the presidency. I'm a Obama supporter because of the person he is and where he wants to take (take back!) the country, not because he's African-American. The media does serve a function in the political process. Look at what it has found out about Palin just in the few days she's been McSame's number 2 pick. And regarding Campbell Brown, she was doing her freakin job in asking the McSame campaign nutjob to give specifics about what Palin has actually done in Alaska. The dude she was interviewing was a rookee no-nothing, and it was clear that her questions ruffled his feathers.

Palin's daughter's pregnancy is no big issue . . . BUT you've got to wonder if the child's father is being pressured to marry Palin's daughter now that the family is in the spotlight. Why not get married when she found out she was expecting rather than wait until after the baby is born (well after the election mind you)? Appearently, this child's father had a Facebook page that was something else . . . on which he stated he didn't want kids and use some real potty-mouth words.

Where were these complaining Republicans when Hillary and Obama's wife were getting questionable media coverage. They loved that but don't like it when the spotlight shines on them. How pathetic.

Obama/Biden '08

JudiNV   September 3rd, 2008 1:30 pm ET

Ready for Change, Michelle is on leave from her job to be with the girls while Barack is campaigning. Once she's in the White House she will not be working an outside job.

Steve, From FL   September 3rd, 2008 1:30 pm ET

Obviously the McCain campaign didn't know about Palin's issues. If they did then why are they crying now? and I'm sure they had to realize the scrutiny on her issues. Did they come up with a strategy to battle the media beforehand? they didn't because they didn't know.

And why are they keeping Palin from the press? if she can't handle the press how will she handle Washington? There is no trust in that ticket, McCain picked Palin because he needs Hillary's votes.

Mike Miller   September 3rd, 2008 1:30 pm ET

What a bunch of crybabies. So just because the media is doing their job they think the media is out to destroy her. Tough luck she is running for vp of the United States of America so it is in the interest of every US citizen to know her business.

nate   September 3rd, 2008 1:30 pm ET

People are missing the point. The media is attacking her child. Who cares that she is pregnant. We are not voting for the kid. As for her husbands DUI. That was over 20 years ago! Thats two decades since his last DUI. Again Her husband is not running for office its her. So lets forget about a non repeat offense done over 20 years ago.

James   September 3rd, 2008 1:30 pm ET

Rethuglicans have fanned the flames of "racial" speculation about Michelle Obama's "Whitey speech" for months now, and then all of a sudden they're complaining about the "fact" that the media has uncovered truthful aspects of Sarah Palin's political dealings as well as philosophies (Secessionist supporter). Nevermind the deal with her daughter's pregnancy (even though it displays a HIGH DEGREE of hypocrisy), Palin's professional and personal character are not "off limits". Sorry Cons, you reap what you sow.

David, ID   September 3rd, 2008 1:30 pm ET

the idiots who are claiming foul are such hypocrites and even worse...the McCain Camp is full of liars claiming a full vetting process!
Ask the officials in Alaska how many of them were asked about Palin. Now compare that to Pawlenty, Biden, Romney, or any other of the Vice-presidential potentials. This is a croc and the sooner the people recognize it the better. McCain took a gamble, and his team is trying to spin it as a win when the golden choice turned out to have problems. If they had done their job, the McCain team wouldn't have to cry and whine

Thomas Baird   September 3rd, 2008 1:30 pm ET

Suprise McCain choice as his running mate is the Palin Governor of Alaska.McCain says she is just what the America and the republican party needs.Question is why havent we head about her until just recently if she is so great. Palin acceptsthe offer tobe his running mate VP pick.She must thinksshe is qualified and can doagood job as VP.or else she would of turned it down.We shall see how it plays out on the Sarah Palin saga.

Jerry   September 3rd, 2008 1:30 pm ET

Well, some one has to tell it like IT IS! Please add Senator Lieberman to that list. That is why he kicked butt during the last election He has always told it like it is.

Also, it's understandable that some men and women who supported Senator Clinton feel a little frazzled. She wasn't even vetted. With all due respect and admiration, this Democrat will be going against her wishes in November.

I do have to admit that after Senator Obama defended Governor Palin's personal/family situation, my feelings about his candidacy turned somewhat more positive. However, with all that venom being spewed by his supporters, it makes one wonder.

Confused   September 3rd, 2008 1:30 pm ET

You obama supporters are in for a huge dose of reality. Do you think obama will be elected? really? Dont be silly. The Dems had this wrapped up. Wrapped up tight. They could have run a sock filled with jello and won. But they gave Joe Sixpack, the union man, a choice between a black man and a woman. Forget what your limosine liberal friends would think. It's just you behind your keyboard. Yes, the labor union heads support obama. They give him money and endorsments. But I ask you. When the curtain is closed, and no one can ever find out, do you think the long shoremen, the construction workers, the guys in the steel mills and auto plants are going to pull the lever for a black man? Really? then you are fooling yourself.

Patrick   September 3rd, 2008 1:30 pm ET

While I do agree that her family, especially her daughter's pregnancy is out of bounds, I do feel that her "past dealings" should be brought to light so that the American public can make an informed decision about who they want in the white house. The state trooper issue, the fact that she was vetted on the day before McCain announced her as his running mate, the fact that she lobbied for earmarks while she was a mayor, but now is against them, this Alaska Independence Party that her husband is a member of, and her dealings with Ted Stevens (before she went head to head with him). All of these things are legitimate stories that the media needs to pursue, not her daughter's pregnancy.

disgusted with both sides   September 3rd, 2008 1:30 pm ET

The media is the reason the country is divided. They only air negative news, especially about the right. I watched the special about McCain and Obama and was appalled at how skewed they were. Obama's read like he's never done anything wrong. No mistakes, ever....even as a child. McCain, on the other hand, did everything wrong, per CNN. What a sham. Both sides, all Americans, want healthcare for everyone, want education for everyone, etc, etc ... the difference is how to achieve these goals. Big government or free economy. Just like not all Liberals are communist, not all Repulicans hate gays and want to bomb abortion clinics. I mean, come on ...

You guys have to check out factcheck.org. You'll see that BOTH sides lie, unfortunately.

I wish someone (media) would rise above the rest and just list the achievements of both sides and THAT'S IT, nothing else. Then we could make an informed decision. No hype. I won't hold my breath, though.

California Voter   September 3rd, 2008 1:30 pm ET

I thought "experience" was not important in the democrats primary, it was then "change" and judgment. After the media played up Obama until it was over the top, "chills running up my legs", now the media is talking about the lack of "experience" on the part of Palin. Obama doesn't need to run any ads - he's got the media doing it for him. This is not to say that I support McCain or Palin, it is just another example for the voters to beware of what they hear, and to get as many facts as you can to make up your own mind. The media has done a disservice to this country in this year's election process! I've listened to outright lies coming from the mouths of "journalists" throughout this election process.

LA2NC   September 3rd, 2008 1:30 pm ET

Abby September 3rd, 2008 12:18 pm ET

The DEMS and obama gang better Back Off the GOV Palin bashing -the treatment of this Qualified Woman is now abusive.
Let's all question OBama – he seems to be a Fraud – he will never be elected. Did the DNC vet this guy????

McCain/Palin much safer choice for America
_________________________________
Where were you when the REPs and MCCAIN were bashing Obama, accusing him of all kinds of things............. Obama has been vetted by the MSM for 18 months and by the American people as well.
If she can't take the heat...... you know the rest. I'm a woman, and I don't get special treatment, neither should she. She should be able to stand on her own merits. If she can't take this, how will she be able to handle the day to day pressures of the VP and GOD Forbid, the top job?

concern   September 3rd, 2008 1:29 pm ET

LET'S ALL TAKE IT EASY ON SARAH PALIN. ALL SHE DID WAS SAY YES TO THE MOST RIDICULOUS QUESTION THAT ANYONE HAS EVER ASK HER. WOULD YOU LIKE TO BE MY VP

ITS MCCAIN'S THAT PUT THE PEOPLE OF THE USA IN THIS MESS!
MCCAIN AND THE GOP PUT HER AND HER FAIMLY ON STAGE.
WE SHOULD FEEL SORRY FOR HER. BLAME MCCAIN PLEASE!!

Michael Richmond, VA   September 3rd, 2008 1:29 pm ET

Elections are not about Republicans or Democrats, librals or conservatives, but rather the future of the country. Choose wisely and we can live in a failry peaceful and prosperous world. Choose unwisely and we will live in a world of instability and difficult economic times. This election could not be more clear. Do you want someone entrenched in the ways of the past, that views the world as it currently is. Or do you want someone who looks to the future and sees the world not as it is but rather as it could be. Forget about the social issues and all the promises each candidate os making (we have seen that things change when in office) and decide which candidate views the world the way you want it to be.

Equal vetting rights regardless of gender   September 3rd, 2008 1:29 pm ET

CNN just showed McCain's and Palin's entire family in a photo shoot before getting on their bus. The teen father was there.

Up until now, I didn't mind what has happened with Sarah's daughter and felt that it is their business. But when I saw those two teens together, I was actually appalled because this seemed a bit twisted.

This is all getting pretty twisted and confusing. Here are these are two KIDS who are supposed to have privacy from media and discussion, but yet, they are parading them around to show Conservative values.

I have to admit that all I saw was underage, pre-marital sex being encouraged, not the issue of pro-life.

I am disgusted and disappointed that McCain/Palin would do something so shallow and cheap.
These kids need to be supported and have their privacy, NOT being showcased as posterchildren for pro-life. This is TWISTED and DISGUSTING.

chris   September 3rd, 2008 1:29 pm ET

if you truly want what is best for our children, our troops and America, then there is no other choice but to vote for Senator Clinton on November 4th.....

Liv2Fish   September 3rd, 2008 1:29 pm ET

The media covers the stories that sell. Sounds like capitalism to me NC. The pathetic thing is that people are more concered about Palin's pregnant daughter and a DWI that occured 22 years ago than an abuse of power that occurred while she was governor. But then again, abuse of power has never been an issue for so called patriotic conservatives. Before you start calling me a communist I'll agree that Palin has more executive experience than Obama; she also has more executive experience than Binden & McCain, both of whom have none. Based on the comments I've read it sounds like Palin is the one that should be running for president. Then again, Bush had more executive experience than all of them combined when he ran in 2000. Look where that got us. P.S. I lived in Wasilla while Palin was mayor so I feel qualified to speak on the subject.

Jay   September 3rd, 2008 1:29 pm ET

We have had 2 years to learn about Obama and McCain..WE HAVE 2 MONTHS to learn abound this train wreak!!! Get Over it! Thats what you get for picking someone we know NOTHING about!

cookiemaker   September 3rd, 2008 1:29 pm ET

Now, y'all lay off miss beauty pageant queen.

She was once head of the PTA after all.......and we all know how rough those meetings can be.

Seriously – I find it very odd and oh so telling that so many are up in arms about the legitimate question of her competence and qualifications. I think a nerve was struck – a very exposed and touchy nerve.

So, this Gov. Palin is the most qualified female the Republican Party has on hand?? Doesn't say much for the Republican Party does it?

I know that John favors beauty queens, but might I suggest that a better pick would have rather had Leiberman in drag.

Greg   September 3rd, 2008 1:29 pm ET

So Mccain admitted a while ago he didnt know much about the economy, and now look who he picks as his vp. Someone who knows even less than he does. And what is our countrys biggest problem right now? Our economy!!! So how is he going to change anything? The answer is.....He's not. He's going to continue with Bush's economic policies and this country will continue to go downhill. As a former marine seeing this man hide behind our flag and touting patriotism and protecting our country, this man is going to bring our country to shambles if elected. Republicans stop hiding behind the flag and saying how patriotic you are, most of you have never served in the military in the first place and its because of you the country is in such bad shape.

Fred in Canada   September 3rd, 2008 1:29 pm ET

Why is CNN, with the "greatest political team in television" raising non-issues about Bristol Palin that are completely unrelated with the choices and the election. Whoa there. Flash of insight. Now I get it. The answer is ....

CNN wants to be the National Enquirer of the internet.

Raylene   September 3rd, 2008 1:29 pm ET

It's absolutely legitimate to question Palin's experience but to ask whether or not she can handle the job with 5 kids is beyond disgraceful and CNN, especially Campbell Brown, is guilty. How can Brown have the nerve to question Palin's ability to do the job when she herself just had a baby? The hypocrisy is unbelievable. I go to CNN for the vast majority of my news, even though I am a conservative, but this attack on Palin, whether it be her choosing to have a baby, her daughter having a baby or ability to do the job, has turned me off to CNN. I am just in shock over the obvious bias here. "No bias, no bull"...bull!!!! Start bringing up the controversy with Biden's son and brother, start bringing up Obama's ties with a terrorist, a racist preacher. Now, those are relevant to this campaign...not Palin's family situation.

Chuckinator   September 3rd, 2008 1:29 pm ET

If unmarried and pregnant 17 year old Bristol Palin were Obama's Child, he would not want her to be "Punished" with a baby.

It's a real shame that Obama's unmarried 17 year old pregnant mother decided to be "Punished" and Punish us all with her baby.

Guatemala-4-Obama   September 3rd, 2008 1:29 pm ET

I hope that every woman in the USA realizes that McCain is just trying to use them so he can win. I don't have anything against Ms. Palin but MY GOD!!!! If something happens to McCain do we really want a mom with five kids to ANSWER THE PHONE AT 3:00 AM. I don't think so!!!!! One of the things that everyone liked and still likes about Hillary is the fact that she is a woman but not just a regular woman. She is a woman with so much experience to take this country as our next President. But the reality is that we are not ready for a woman to be our President because if we were Hillary would be the one. Not some hockey mom with 5 kids and ready to be a granny. I am voting for OBAMA!!!!!! Now, I can see clear that Obama and Biden are the ones that will take this country were it needs to be. We need a CHANGE and Obama is the one that will bring that to us. He is already giving us a Legacy of Hope that we need to make the right decision on Nov. 4.

God Bless America.

Peggy Lucas, Middletown, Pennsylvania   September 3rd, 2008 1:29 pm ET

The media is doing nothing more to Sarah Palin than they did to Hillary. If anything, they are giving her more breaks! Who has more baggage? My guess is Mrs. Palin. Just "Hockey Mom" my foot.

Gail   September 3rd, 2008 1:29 pm ET

Enough. McCain just got off his plane, they took a family photo, all the while Palin jittering around like a mother talking to her kids as if she's at a state fair. Send the kids home! Their mere presence is a distraction to the issues, THIS IS BUSINESS!

Enough   September 3rd, 2008 1:29 pm ET

Enough! Are you all reading the ugly comments! Are we going to let the media dictate who our next President and Vice President will be? No, we aren't. Make your own decisions America! Don't let the media have so much flippen power! Make your own decisions based on the facts. It shouldn't be about black or white, kids or no kids, pregnancy or working moms. Base your decision on the candidates, not on what the media writes about the candidates. Get a grip America!

FEMALE voter in PA   September 3rd, 2008 1:29 pm ET

Do you know Biden rec'd 5 deferments from service in Vietnam, despite the fact that he loves to brag about the shape he's in
and that his son rec'd $100k from mbna while he was pushing legislation to change the bankruptcy rules, which benefitted mbna
nope, because the media will ignore those stories

Microtek   September 3rd, 2008 1:29 pm ET

Want the true Obamabots?

Ask your Messiah's Obama how old his mother was when she gave birth to him??????

You would be very surprised that Obama's mother gave birth to him when she was 18. That is right at 18.

So now should you shut up???

President McCain

D   September 3rd, 2008 1:29 pm ET

1. If her husband was running for VP, there would be no questions about the children and whether he is a good father.

2. When other governors ran for president or were being vetted for VP, there was no concern over their foreign policy experience.

3. The trooper issue should be a non-issue. She initiated the investigation herself. The trooper was abusive to his wife, tasered his 11 yr old step son and threatened the governor and her family. Is this someone you would want working in law enforcement carrying a gun?

Natasha   September 3rd, 2008 1:29 pm ET

She decided to take the nomination as VP.
The republican and America seem to have had a problem with getting to know Barack Obama. Now it is her turn. WE know Biden. NO ONE know this woman in the connecting state. So tough luck.......... I hope the republican don't think American are that desperate for a woman in title only. She is not known so she will be exposed period.
I will not vote for her because she would not make a good president, she has a family to take care of right now. So I think she's better off as governor.

Sean   September 3rd, 2008 1:29 pm ET

The media is not only out to destroy Palin, but McCain as well, along with any Republican. They go on and on about investigations/qualifications regarding McCain/Palin but do nothing when it comes to Obama/Biden. At the end of the day, Obama still has no experience and Biden is still a plagiarist.

Cambell Brown, Chris Mathews, Keith Olberman....they are all a disgrace to journalism. People are too stupid to think for themselves and will pretty much eat anything CNN and other media giants will throw at them. Wake up people. The "pundit report cards" are hilarious on CNN. If that doesn't show bias, nothing does.

Oh and Liberals....your caps lock is always on and your exclamation key is broke. Please get those fixed. Thanks.

Eric E   September 3rd, 2008 1:28 pm ET

I have never seen the media hammer a candidate so hard in my life. It is obvious that the media has an agenda they are trying to force on the public. The American people will see the media attacks for what they really are... partisan attacks in order to sway public opinion.

Brian from Texas   September 3rd, 2008 1:28 pm ET

If the definition of experience by the Republicans hold true, then any mayor of any size town in the US is more qualified to be President than any Senator or Representative out there. Seriously?
Of course Palin is going to make news and a big splash. Isnt that what McCain was doing when he picked her. That and the fact that Americans know very little about her.

Matt   September 3rd, 2008 1:28 pm ET

So, it's okay for the Republicans to accuse Obama of being Muslim and distort the military records of John Kerry and Max Cleland, yet when it comes to inquiring about a republican candidate's questionable past, the Republicans accuse the media of scandal? Give me a break. Hypocrites.

Kevin   September 3rd, 2008 1:28 pm ET

The media is doing what McCain should have done: a background check.

If he doesn't know how to properly hire someone, how effective will his cabinet be.

robin   September 3rd, 2008 1:28 pm ET

I cant believe I am even wasting my time on a CNN blog site your network is so obviously bias. To be called a news network is a joke. You belong with the likes of the Jerry Springer show and Maury absolutely tasteless
television that is what CNN is.

anon   September 3rd, 2008 1:28 pm ET

Rebublican Party = Misinformation

WMDs? Nothing has been learned in the last 8 years.
Lies cover lies.

Jimmy   September 3rd, 2008 1:28 pm ET

Couldn't agree more. The media and Obama can't handle strong women so they try to destory them.

Jeffrey: So creationism is "illogical and bizzare"? But teaching that everything appeared OUT OF NOTHING is perfectly normal?!?! What alternate reality are you living in!

chris   September 3rd, 2008 1:28 pm ET

the obama lemmings have no idea that they are acting and sounding like republicans right now.....which only supports the same thing....

FEMALE voter in PA   September 3rd, 2008 1:28 pm ET

Do you know Biden rec'd 5 deferrments from service in Vietnam, despite the fact that he loves to brag about the shape he's in
and that his son rec'd $100k from MBNA while he was pushing legislation to change the bankruptcy rules, which benefitted mbna
nope, because the media will ignore those stories.

Lynn in NM   September 3rd, 2008 1:28 pm ET

Of course the media wants to destroy her. They are liberal Democrats. Has anyone ever noticed the slant to the news????? Gov. Palin might actually give Mc Cain a chance, and that would mean the taxes would not get raised for another 8 years. Got to have those high taxes!

Licensed to Vote   September 3rd, 2008 1:28 pm ET

Complete hypocrosy..

So McCain shoots from the hip and choses an unknown inexperienced governer with scandals and issues or her own, and noone is allowed to ask any questions?

Well I got news for Schmidt.

McCains judgment is in question and Palin was not a good choice considering Romney, Kay Bailey Hutchinson, Tom Ridge, TIm Pawlenty, or even Lieberman.

McCain wanted to appease Neo-Cons instead of thinking about where this will leave the country if Palin gets control with all of her issues and no experience.

Mark   September 3rd, 2008 1:28 pm ET

I would think the first question that a potential VP should be asked is: have you or your spouse ever held memberships in any group that advocates the secession of your home state from the Union? Apparently, they did ask that one because Sarah Palin and her husband have ties/membership to the Alaskan Independence Party, a radical group that wants Alaska to secede from the Union. Seriously, folks, this is the smoking gun regarding McCain's judgment and the type of radical thoughts that Palin holds. Sadly, the media is not even reporting it.

bc   September 3rd, 2008 1:28 pm ET

If you can't handle the heat, get off the ticket. When Campbell Brown was unable to get any type of answer from the McCain spokesperson about her experience, that's when it became crystal clear that they chose an empty suit for a VP. If this is the type of 'straight talk' we can expect from a McCain administration, I am very, very afraid.

Brian   September 3rd, 2008 1:28 pm ET

Sure... the democrats are the sexist, racist, slanderous, deceitful party! Nice try, republicans, but you can keep it!

Also, Obama spent the past 10 MONTHS being vetting in the public eye and has come through with flying colors.

Perhaps Palin is a little too thin-skinned for this exercise McCain is putting her through?

Cynthia St. Louis   September 3rd, 2008 1:28 pm ET

The sleazy Republican propoganda machine is at it again. Of course that bad, liberal "media" is being unfair to Sarah Palin!

Pay attention fellow Americans! The propoganda is in full swing "revising" and "revisiting" Gov. Palin's views and past actions. The abuse of power investigation (Troopergate) is also now being controlled by the McCain campaign.

The 1988 culture wars are back!!

AREN'T WE, AS A COUNTRY AND PEOPLE, BETTER THAN THIS??

Obama/Biden 08 and 12

amy in nc   September 3rd, 2008 1:28 pm ET

Sarah Palin doesn't even have to speak, much less actually exist, it appears that McCain has chosen her for every reason other than her actual execution and implimentation of executive duties. She is a woman, she chose to bring a sick child into the world as opposed to having an abortion, her husband is in a union, she has 5 kids, she knows her way around a rifle, her son is about to go to Iraq...why talk about her actual performance when you have all of this instead? The said part is that not only does McCain's campaign think we are that ignorant, most of us really are (i.e. they re-elected our current president).

CK   September 3rd, 2008 1:27 pm ET

First Hillary now Palin? Hmmmm....Maybe there is more behind the media's motive besides ratings. Very dangerous, fellows.

renee- Florida   September 3rd, 2008 1:27 pm ET

The Repubs are such hypocrites! They are the true mudslingers- always have been–always will be. Now they're trying to play the "sexism card"–just the way they planned...

Pat M   September 3rd, 2008 1:27 pm ET

Being a Govenor of a Alaska, a Mayor of a very small Alaska town, dealing with Oil Corporations, and a Command of an inactive military Guard does not qualify anyone for a Vice Presidency!

I wish the Media would stop this controversary and take the high road which would be to admit this woman is not VP material and not next in line Americans may need should McCain not be able to fill his duties!
Let's be truthful and vote for Americans safety and future not Gender, Fluff, and embellished, exaggeration of qualifications by the RNC and supporters! Americans deserve much better!

Hips   September 3rd, 2008 1:27 pm ET

Hypocrisy reins with McCain and Palin....she says she wants creationism taught in schools along with evolutionism...cause information is good! But yet she wants 'abstinence only' taught ......how's that working for ya btw Sarah? Sure did wonders for your daughter. She's a wing nut....and it will be proven before long. She doesn't beleive Global Warming is due to Humankind, she wants to legalize aerial shooting of wildlife in her home state.....they don't want that btw....Obama/Biden in November....or we are doomed to more stupidity like the last 8 years.

Kat, Huntington, West Virginia   September 3rd, 2008 1:27 pm ET

As a lifelong liberal democrat I will not vote for McCain and Palin (or BO and Biden by the way) but I do find the questions about her and to her concerning her family responsibilites disappointing, sexist and more than a little hypocritical. What about BO's kids and family responsibilites, no one is asking him those questions. The most qualified person for this job is not on the ticket and I fear that we will all suffer because of that fact. My vote goes to the Greens.
McKinney 08

andy   September 3rd, 2008 1:27 pm ET

if obama has enough experience to be president, palin certainly has enough to be VP

a mother   September 3rd, 2008 1:27 pm ET

Sarah Palin teenage daughter made a mistake, I'm not faulting her for that ;she's human, but her mother (parents) chose to put the national spotlight on her, not us.

Sue   September 3rd, 2008 1:26 pm ET

Hey, man, this is politics! It's how it's always been, you run for high office, you get picked to pieces. If they don't think she can withstand it, she shouldn't be the nominee.

linda., bella vista, ar   September 3rd, 2008 1:26 pm ET

Seems like this 'campaign' just has psychological problems, you know like the economy. And they are just a bunch of 'whiners' like the folks that think we should have universal-one payer health care.

We know the true heart of the campaign. Use the abortion wedge issue and ignore that Palin used her line item veto to cut funding for Covenant House Alaska that provides support for teen moms who choose to keep their babies but are without resources.

Tim   September 3rd, 2008 1:26 pm ET

I ignore every posting that has a word in it that is in all caps.

Mike   September 3rd, 2008 1:26 pm ET

If Palin's two years of experience is good enough, how come Tom Ridge's 2 terms were not!!

Were BOTH Paris and Britney BUSY!   September 3rd, 2008 1:26 pm ET

Who is the CELEBRITY now McCrypt!

Len in Washington   September 3rd, 2008 1:26 pm ET

Uhhhh....excuse me. You didn't seem to mind at all when Hillary was getting bombarded. Being very frank, I'm an Obama supporter but fair is fair. This "whining" by the Republicans is baseless. I WANT to know about this person. The Republicans will tell me their version but I want an "outside" version. If they don't like....that's just too bad.

Keep up the good work, Media. The VAST majority of us out here appreciate it.

FREEDOM OF THE PRESS..the next Item on the Republican hit list!

HH   September 3rd, 2008 1:26 pm ET

@ct, @willam – Both of you have used the word "Hypocrite" to describe the Republicans opposition to these reports. The point you seem to be missing is that the ads that McCain has been running are his political ads. The media is not investigating or reporting on these things about Obama, they are just ignoring them. The complaint from the McCain camp is about the medai scrutiny of their choice for VP and her possible problems when they turn a blind eye to the other candidates problems.

Mid-Twenties Male   September 3rd, 2008 1:26 pm ET

This will be my third presidential election that I get to vote in and it amazes me the level of anger, even hate that comes from the left and media in this election process. In 2000, they lost to George W Bush and in 2004, they lost to him again both by a narrow margin. Now it's like they (the media) has made a deal with the dems to throw everything including the kitchen sink at the right no matter how shameful or obvious it is. They think that if they could "package" and "market" Obama as the greatest thing since slice bread then it will sway enough people over to their side and they will win in November. <<>> If Obama is SOOO Great and EVERYONE is HURTING and NEEDING CHANGE, then why are the polls so close? Why after everything the media and left has through it John McCain and Palin... why are they still close? After listening to the Democratic Convention last week and hearing about how America is hated across the globe and everyone is suffering, broke, jobless, homeless, sick and desperate for change, after every morning , evening and nightly new cast slamming John McCain and Sarah Palin and Praising Obama and hiding covering up for his inexperience and relationships....why are the polls so close. You would think that Obama would be at 70 – 80%, hell why even have an election. America will vote, and I will be laughing my head off when John McCain and Sarah Palin win. The left and the Media will not know what to do. They have tried to get a Lock Box Global Warming Alarmist elected in 2000, then some
Herman Monster Purple Heart Old Dude elected in 2004 and now they want to make "History" with the first Black Community Organizer.

KATHLEEN   September 3rd, 2008 1:26 pm ET

Republicans are whinning!!!

Palin called Hillary a whiner!!!!

McCain turns on a dime.QUICK DECIDER! Sounds like somebody else I know. Scary!! Wonder if he had Mitt, and Pawlawty, thinking
they were his choice and decided to "trick" everyone at the last minute.
He must have stayed up til 3 a.m. to come up with this choice.

McCain is the MASTER of "Surprise". He LOVES IT!!!! The games.

NW Dem   September 3rd, 2008 1:26 pm ET

Gee smart voter, you are really sexist!
She has a husband completely capable of parenting the children but you seem to feel it's her job to raise the kids?
Would you feel the same way if it were a man running for vp with a special needs child?

This is the same type of sexism the Obama camp is known for!

Soooooooo sick of Bill   September 3rd, 2008 1:26 pm ET

Whatever man, you guys didn't vett her and now the media is doing it for you. You don't like it because they are finding out more info than you. And now you're pulling the "sexism" card, are you kidding me? As I woman I telll you nothing is worse than pulling a false sexism card.

Eric   September 3rd, 2008 1:26 pm ET

Let's see. After the scare tactic, the usual we are patriotic you're not strategy, now it's the blame the liberal media. Two days in the convention and there is not one message about what they will do to lift the country. did someone say "more of the same".
Possible the most pathetic campaign in rencent history.

Republicans Hate America   September 3rd, 2008 1:26 pm ET

you wanted news coverage mcphony well now you got it.

RZ   September 3rd, 2008 1:26 pm ET

If you can't take the heat get out of the kitchen. Opps...She already did!! Couldn't resist that one. I'm a Hillary supporter who will vote for Obama. McCain doesn't like a full contact sport when the offense is against him. She has to be skewered just like anyone else running for office. It’s Fair. It’s the American way! You just have to love American politics!!

Theresa - Minneapolis   September 3rd, 2008 1:26 pm ET

Quit playing the gender card. OMG... It's a faux nothing! Of course there is a plan to destroy the Republican ticket. What in the world have the Republicans been doing to the Democrats? Get a clue, it's politics!!

AND admit it! She wasn't vetted very well...

William, from Cali!   September 3rd, 2008 1:26 pm ET

Being the first female vice president of the Republican party, is one thing;but to be next in line to be the "first female President of these United States", the first in its history; now that's something to really ...STOP! and think long and hard about.............Seriously!

Spoiler   September 3rd, 2008 1:26 pm ET

Obama hasen't touched on any of these controversial issues surrounding sarah palin. McCain campain is blaming the media. How does that translate to the obama campaign?

bruja   September 3rd, 2008 1:26 pm ET

Yes Abby, you are safer now: the lady know how to shoot a moose!!!!
She is against the right to choose for women, against education, against science, has ties to big oil AND KNOW HOW TO KILL AN ANIMAL!, Ms Clinton thanks you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Sandy   September 3rd, 2008 1:26 pm ET

By all means, when things aren't going your way, blame the media. Great scapegoat, almost as good as W.

eric from canada   September 3rd, 2008 1:26 pm ET

AS A CANADIAN I'M VERY PROUD TO THE DEMOCRATS PARTY AND BARACK OBAMA MACCAIN IS DISASTER FOR THE USA MAKE THE RIGHT CHOICE GUYS VOTE DEMOCRATS OBAMA BIDEN 2009

marc   September 3rd, 2008 1:26 pm ET

Cambell brown should be FIRED! woman are most ficous against OTHER women...it is so sad to see. so childish–GO SARAH–some of us really want to see women succeed.

sandee in Portland   September 3rd, 2008 1:26 pm ET

The Republicans started the attacks; now that the shoes are on the other foot, they are complaining. No way would I vote for this team. All I see at their convention is a bunch of OLD, white people and mostly men.

Now, I, also, am an old white woman, but I would rather have new, young blood running our country with new, fresh ideas. Also, Palin would just be a yes person to McCain. Biden, on the other hand, will question Obama and not just be a sheep!

Gail   September 3rd, 2008 1:25 pm ET

He Smalltown NC – I think we all know by now Obama is much, much more than ‘just a community organizer’. I think we all know by now what a strong and true leader he really is.

I also think we all know what a lying bunch of hypocrites the GOPers are.

Go Media! Keep up the good work. We’re counting on you.

Oakland 99   September 3rd, 2008 1:25 pm ET

Whiners. Hey, when are they have Palin do a real interview or speak to the press? What are they afaid of?

sean   September 3rd, 2008 1:25 pm ET

Republicans can spin all they want. Palin is really underqualified, but past VPs have been too. My biggest concerns surround her seperatist tendencies as seen in the Alaska Independence Party-potentially treasonous stuff there.

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!   September 3rd, 2008 1:25 pm ET

Obama has been told for 18 months that he has not been properly vetted . YET How can Palin be properly vetted already it's been 5 DAYS . We have no idea what she thinks about any MAJOR ISSUE .

Anyone who is claiming to be comfortable with this pick of VP is lying through there teeth They don't know her AND NETHIER DO I .

Richard, FL   September 3rd, 2008 1:25 pm ET

Obama: 11 years experience in state and federal government

Palin: 639 days experience in state and federal government

The media didn't make this up. It's reality for all the hypocrites that complain about Obama's experience.

Anonymous   September 3rd, 2008 1:25 pm ET

Palin never called Hillary voters A bunch of whiners.. You lie just to make Palin look bad. You obama's lover tell one thing Obama did good ? He is fraud and bla bla bla and noting else.

HAWK, TEXAS   September 3rd, 2008 1:25 pm ET

MCCAIN PICKED A LOSER. HIS CAMPAIGN HAS BLASTED OBAMA AND HILLARY FROM DAY ONE, I GIVE HIM 30 DAYS BEFORE HE DROPS PALIN. DO YOU KNOW THAT THE OTHER PRISONERS OF WAR CALLED MCCAIN SONGBIRD BECAUSE HE MADE VIDEOS AGAINST AMERICA FOR THE ENEMY. HIS DOPER WIFE, WHOM STOLE THE DRUGS, HIS TIES TO ORGINIZED CRIME. HIS NOT SHOWING UP TO VOTE ON BILLS OVER 164 TIMES, HIS VOTING AGINST EVERY VETERANS BILL THAT CAME UP.AND THE LIST GOES ON AND ON.

Skip from Fairfax, VA   September 3rd, 2008 1:25 pm ET

The coverage is enough to make you vomit! The media should be ashamed of themselves for dragging a young girl through the mud. The one other factor that really disgusts me...and has not been addressed is the fact that the Palin family is a military family. Their son is in the Army, se to deploy Sept 11. I guess if he was going to Harvard, Princeton or Columbia, and had a "D" by his name instead of an "R", then he'd be hailed as a hero...Campbell Brown is just jealous because she has not lived up to her own expectations!

Andrew   September 3rd, 2008 1:25 pm ET

It's not so much a faux media scandal as it is the media being able to uncover these stories so easily. It's either a bad cover job or they really just didn't vet her as thoroughly as they would like us to believe.

Livia   September 3rd, 2008 1:25 pm ET

I would agree that it is inappropriate to involve candidate's family's in nasty political bashing if every single one of Barack Obama's opponents haven't been talking about HIS family this entire campaign.

The Republican party is one of convenient values, arguments, and and standards. I'm more than happy to just sit back and watch them self-destruct. McCain clearly made a hasty choice and now he's suffering the consequences. Obama and McCain both had the opportunity to make a decision, and they both made it in their own way, which tells us a lot about each man.

I don't know about you but I trust more in someone who surrounds himself with academics and makes cautious, well considered, logical decisions than someone who quickly chooses the first person he saw when his other two picks didn't work out (ironic the reason he couldn't chose them was because of a moral issue, eh?).

JohnLee   September 3rd, 2008 1:25 pm ET

What arrogance! What does this McCainBush campaign think needs to happen! We're just supposed to accept McCain's statements about Palin at his word? We've done that for almost 8 years and look at where its gotten this country! I can't believe the arrogance of McBush and company. They are the ones making a mockery out of the political process. Maybe Palin needs to call mcBush a whinner because that's what he is. He's an overgrown baby!

Chang   September 3rd, 2008 1:25 pm ET

how is it "putting your country first" when the person tapped to be commander-in-chief-in-waiting was just the mayor of a tiny town two years ago?

how is it sexist for Americans to question Palin's qualifications, but entirely appropriate for the GOP to attack and question Obama's?

how is it that when a Republican candidate's teen daughter gets pregnant, the GOP demands (rightly) privacy for the family, but if it were the Democratic candidate's daughter, the GOP would turn the ordeal into a high-profile and very public referrendum on American values and Democratic morals?

Cleduc   September 3rd, 2008 1:25 pm ET

What bothers me more about this Palin siutation is that GOP politicians that I had some respect for refuse to provide an honest answer to some simple questions. They're evasive, etc. I can deal with some political answers to some extent or the expressing of a point of view that I don't agree with but they've really put me off when avoiding the facts on this. The people who voted for them deserve an honest forthright answer.

Guiliani saying she could handle a 9/11 when he's never met her or talked with her? This is too much for me. These people clearly don't get it or are playing the citizens for being stupid. Whatever. It's a disgrace and I'm disgusted. I'll never look at any of these clowns with a morsle of respect again because they're just playing games with our future.

Grog in Ohio   September 3rd, 2008 1:25 pm ET

Wow... really? Can we imagine the Republican and right wing attack machine scouring a Democratic candidate with such a record and skeletons in the closet? The Republicans have made non-issue attacks a Karl Rovian state of the art campaign technique and now complain about the media dealing in FACTS? What a bunch of cry-babies!!

139 days till the end of the Bush administration.

sandy cole   September 3rd, 2008 1:25 pm ET

I THINK PALIN IS THE BEST CHOSE HE COULD HAVE MADE. EVER TIME I TURN ON THE TV ALL I SEE ID OBAMA, HIS WIFE, HIS KIDS. CNN HAS PUSHED OBAMA DOW EVERYONE'S THROAT. ITS SICKENING

Joe G   September 3rd, 2008 1:25 pm ET

Every day that goes by it becomes more clear to me. This country is more divided than ever before. If Obama wins, it will be all out war in Washington D.C. Nothing will get done and all the talk of change and hope will mean nothing.

The hatred between the parties is at an old time high.

LilRedFox   September 3rd, 2008 1:25 pm ET

No wonder Alaskans like her — they get MONEY. She is dispensing huge sums to Alaskans, who have no income or sales taxes, based on the staggering profits of oil production. Alaskans are taking in the windfall profits, then when they get income from state taxes on the oil industry, they get to write that off their federal tax burden, putting even more taxes on the rest of us.

Why isn't a share of these profits from American oil going to the rest of the country? Isn't some of this drilling on federal lands? Certainly ANWR is federal. Will the rest of the US get paybacks as well? I think not.

This is a governor of an oil-rich state, and she has no idea about the economic woes of the rest of the country.

jen   September 3rd, 2008 1:25 pm ET

Do we have any pics of Mrs. Palin pregnant with her 4 month old? I'm interested. Why didn't they get married before the pregnancy? So does this mean she would allow her 16 year old daughter to marry? And... what does this say about Mrs. Palin? A 17 year is certainly not ready for marriage.

txpbklyn   September 3rd, 2008 1:25 pm ET

As I keep stating this isn't about Palin's daughter being a soon to be teenage mother. It's about the desperate messures from the McCain Camp. The bottom line is he wanted to sway women voters to vote for his party's ticket just because of him adding Palin a female to the ticket. I think it was a low blow and it's coming back to haunt the Republicans. Not to mention their trying to undermind Obama, stating that Palin has more experience then him. I know that politics can get real down and dirty, but this is INSANE... I think that Palin isn't responsible enough to run this country providing their party wins and something happens to McCain. Their's no one in hell do Americans feel comfortable with such a scenario. I'm anxiously waiting for November 4th, 2008 bc I'm sick of the nonsense that we're currenlty facing with this race. OBAMA, will be our next President bc the American people wouldn't have it any other way. OBAMA doesn't get as much credit as he deserves. Needless to say he will "Prevail."

Wow Internet thugs can read talk points who knew?   September 3rd, 2008 1:25 pm ET

you people are pathetic

for 6 month McCain has been bashing Obama's experience and that he

doesn't understand foreign policy when every thing Obama has stated

that would be a good Idea has been adopted by Bush with exception of the surge so that is one for McCain.

this lady has been outside the country once and her Foreign Policy experience in the 47th largest state is that Alaska is close to Russia

so the Governors of Washington and North Dakota are experts.

she is Capable but not Qualified by McCain's Standards

this is the only Commander n Chief decision he can make and he a 72yo is going to have a person on this ticket that until 20 months ago
was mayor of a 6500-9000 person town in a state that is 1/5th the size of Orange County CA

give me a break

if you think because she can shoot and dress a moose is going to get you a job, save your house

the you are a fool

2000 fool me once shame on them
2004 fool me twice shame on you
2008 if you get fooled a third time then you are an Idiot

Barack Obama has proved himself through a 20 month campaign
raised more money from more people then anyone
defeated his part's most powerful machine
and is Organized in 50 states
and has never been 1 day in debt
What other Candidate can say that – only him
and one more thing no back talk, leaking or arguing for journalist as in other campaigns.

JOE ROLAND   September 3rd, 2008 1:24 pm ET

Palin need to be questioned for child abuse. A sick 4 months old baby abandoned for political campaign,that´s ego.

She is under investigation for in her state( not yet concluded).
A member of a party that wants independent from the union for five years.

Preach abstennce,but her 17 years old daughter is pregnant for another under age boy.

Anti abortion but pro-gun.

Demanded 27 million doollars earmark for a city of 6700 residents.

Have mate MCcain twice before selection.

Beauty queen,young and no nothing about natonal politics, she cannot face Putin, and China.

So Republican,what is lie about all this. It the same press you have used in the last one year to spread evil and negative informations about democratic party and OBAMA.

IF ONE SUPPORT REPUBLICANS HE IS PETROTIC,AND ANY CONTRARY VIEW OR YOU ARE A DEMOCRAT YOU ARE UN-PETROTIC.

PLEASE ENOUGH WAR MONGERS....... ONE BILLION DOLLARS TO GEORGIA FOR AID FOR THE IRRESPOSIBILTY OF THEIR PRESIDENT, THEN HOW MUCH FOR NEW ORLEANS

beevee   September 3rd, 2008 1:24 pm ET

I don't blame the media for being critical of Palin. After all she is a VP candidate and is subject to media scrutiny. If there are no skeletons in her closet she should be able to take the heat from the media. There is no need for the GOP leaders to compalin this as being unfair. It is all part of the process. Winers.

Lynn   September 3rd, 2008 1:24 pm ET

I can tell you what the Republican Party does NOT stand for and that is diversity. They want to keep things white. Has anyone asked these people to get out of Alaska and see that the world is changing whether they like it or not? Palin and McCain deserve each other and you can throw Lieberman in for the count.

Bwana Doc   September 3rd, 2008 1:24 pm ET

Let's see, we've got a choice...

A old tough maverick war hero married to a gorgeous woman who owns a beer distributorship with a running mate that's a tough, beautiful, competent, smart articulate mom that took on her party's establishment and knows how to skin a moose.

and the other side we have two lawyers...

No brainer.

KBJ   September 3rd, 2008 1:24 pm ET

I agree! The media has done everything they can to discredit her because they fear her. And most Americans can see right through the right wing media smear campaign. It's blatantly obvious to the viewers the sexism and discrimination that is going on here. I though we as women had come a lot further along, but it looks like we still have a lot of work to do! I applaud McCain's excellent choice!!

ss   September 3rd, 2008 1:24 pm ET

Take the eyes off the issues, unemployment, rising gas prices, home foreclosures, healthcare, social security i.e. Same old poltics this is how Bush/Chaney got in twice. Don't be fooled.

Simon   September 3rd, 2008 1:24 pm ET

What a lot of lies as usual. The media isn't trying to destroy Palin. Just one more karl rove tactic to make it appear like the poor little Republican Party is the vicitm of that nasty powerful liberal media when we all know the Republican Party's supporters own the media.

Roxanne J, SC   September 3rd, 2008 1:24 pm ET

You've got to love it. McSame whines about all of the press that Obama gets neglecting to notice that about 70% of it is negative press. He also whines that the media is so obsessed with Obama. Now, the tables are turned and his campaign is getting heat and he cries that there is some scandal or conspriacy. Waahhh!! What a whine. You can't have it both ways.

Obama/Biden 08'

What!?!   September 3rd, 2008 1:24 pm ET

Are you serious....

You know the republicans are the biggest party of hypocrites to have ever been around

How come none of those evangelical leaders are talking about how Bristol and that boy broke God's rule of no sex before marriage

all they seem to be talking about is how great it is that they are keeping the baby

republicans only seem to want to cover their own party's positives and the democrats negatives- which they constantly lie about

Anonymous   September 3rd, 2008 1:24 pm ET

So McCain wanted media attention, and he wanted to shake up the process. Now, when the process is sufficiently shaken, he wants people to back off.

This cracks me up, too: "who has never been a part of the old boys' network ."

Said the old boy.

Mike Van   September 3rd, 2008 1:24 pm ET

Funny – I see that exactly the other way around. I did not hear the republicans when the media were relentlessly beating on Obama on his so called " inexperience", not to talk about the never ending efforts from the media to keep this Hillary vs. Obama issue alive, which has greatly helped the Republicans.
But I do not need media bias to make up my mind. I look at the FACTS of a candidate.
Yes, she is inexperienced and shallow. But that's not the worst part.
I will never, I repeat, NEVER, vote for any candidate who does not believe in evolution. A candidate who believes that the world is only 5000 years old and that mankind once use the dinosaurs as horses, I would prefer that kind of silliness to stay with The Flintstones. But ideas like that have NO place in the white house! It's bad enough this country is quickly loosing its #1 place in the world due to the complete neglect of science and engineering education!

Kate   September 3rd, 2008 1:24 pm ET

Campbell Brown should be completely disgusted with herself. Before the actual interview started, she teased with a "political bombshell" story about the daughter, and that was the focus of the entire interview, except for 30 seconds at the end. CNN is trying to defend itself now, suggesting the entire interview was about the experience issue, but for close to ten minutes, she attacked, and attacked, and attacked the daugher, and finally with 30 seconds to go in the interview, finally brought up an experience question. The entire interview was just sickening to watch.

AJ in PA   September 3rd, 2008 1:24 pm ET

As an Independent voter in PA, I have been paying close attention to both sides. I like things to make good sense so that I can make a sensible decision at voting time. Obama's decision to bring Biden on board was understandable. McCain's decision to bring in Palin smacks of desperation and pandering. No wonder the media is suspicious. And thank goodness they are–how else are we voters supposed to make a decision if all the elements are not known (vetted in public, as they should be)? If, as in the case of an unknown like Palin, it takes the media to do our public vetting, I say, once again, thank goodness the media is on it. Don't like it, McCain/Repuplicans? Sorry, but we, the people, and our need to know how to vote is of more importance than your need to have us accept your choices out of hand.

James   September 3rd, 2008 1:24 pm ET

McCain was a POW? I've never heard that before.

Katy   September 3rd, 2008 1:24 pm ET

Yeah, blame it on the media. They just don't want the truth out.

LA2NC   September 3rd, 2008 1:24 pm ET

Voted for Hillary, Smalltown, NC September 3rd, 2008 12:14 pm ET

You choose –

_____________________

I choose CHOICE, something that wont be available if Mccain/Palin are elected. I choose turning around the economy. I choose less war and more diplomacy. I choose a better America for all of us.............. I CHOOSE OBAMA/ BIDEN

Jesse, St. Louis Park, MN   September 3rd, 2008 1:23 pm ET

I didn't hear ol' Steve-O whining when they were putting out stupid Paris Hilton attacks ads against Obama, and the media were putting each of these stupid ads on their websites.

Don't blame the media or the rest of us for this stupid pick of an unqualified VP candidate who happens to have quite a few skeletons in her closet.

THAT IS YOUR FAULT!

Bob   September 3rd, 2008 1:23 pm ET

The media, and yes CNN, have been asking the right questions. And, the Republican resonse that she is more qualified than Barak Obama is technically wrong; it is McCain that is running against Obama. Their response causes me to conclude that she is more qualified than McCain. He has never administrated anything.

I detest political pandering which is what McCain has done here.

Southern Girl   September 3rd, 2008 1:23 pm ET

However, Will someone please ask Obama how he juggles raising his daughters and running for president so they Repubs can't stop making this sexist.

CL OT   September 3rd, 2008 1:23 pm ET

The media will do whatever it takes to get Obama elected. Even if it means ponding on a 17 year old girl.

DDGirl   September 3rd, 2008 1:23 pm ET

I don't think the media is giving her a hard time. I find it funny how the republican'ts will criticize Obama and his family for things that are foolish and petty situations. The republicant's want everyone to believe that Sarah Eskimo is living a normal american life, with normal american values. I am a woman who can see that she is being used by MCBUSH to get female voters to vote for them, but as a proud democrat , I will vote for OBAMA AND BIDEN!!

Peppermint Patty   September 3rd, 2008 1:23 pm ET

Yo, Chip. Vetted means doing your homework on your pick for veep. Not just knowing that the person exists out there somewhere. If the Republicans had done theirs, she never would have been selected. Those of us we can see the wolf in sheep's clothing are paying closer attention than you think. And our shotgun is loaded and ready! Enough of your republican BS.

Tess   September 3rd, 2008 1:23 pm ET

Obama supporters have hit the lowest point in politic by attacking Palin's daughter pregnancy. They have nothing else to talk about. It’s pathetic for the party and its people!

I became Ex-Democrat in disgust at the way they treated Hillary!!!! Too disgust to listen to anything they have to say!!!!

Obama, remember one thing, your new young voters you get from this campaign will be canceled out by millions of Hillary supporters like my family and friends!!!!!!

Confused in DC   September 3rd, 2008 1:23 pm ET

Jamie Lynn Spears IS a "public" person by fact of being an actor/singer or whatever it is that she does. Bristol Palin is a "private" person. Her mom is the "public" person. BAD EXCUSE

Mike from St. Louis   September 3rd, 2008 1:23 pm ET

This pick for the VP spot has got to be the biggest joke in politics right now. People are continuously saying that her teenage pregnant daughter has nothing to do with Sarah's policies. Baloney!! That goes directly against her parenting and leadership qualities. She forgot to insteal morales and dignity into her kids.
Then people are saying that Palin is a reformer and a breath of fresh air to washington...Baloney!! She's already under investigation for abuse of power. Bush and is entire administration has been abusing executive power since they took office, and the Republicans go and get a small town women, who is connected to an oil man, and put her on a reform ticket?? Get real and get smart. This pick was horrible and everyone should question it!

nola   September 3rd, 2008 1:23 pm ET

I think that the media should continue and complet the vetting process that McCain felt was not needed. Women do not settle for any woman to compete in this process. Senator Clinton was a highly qualified individual – and any woman that will compete in this political arena must be as qualified as she was. We as woman cannot ever allow the standard to be lower.

David   September 3rd, 2008 1:23 pm ET

The McCain people need to grow up! You can't have it both ways! You are critical of Obama saying he doesn't have experience and yet you pick a VP that has FAR less experience! And then you cry when the media does their job and asks good questions! I may have been neutral before but the recent actions by McCain and his clowns has convinced me America does NOT need them in the White House!!!

Voting for Obama   September 3rd, 2008 1:23 pm ET

The Republincans are dumb. I am woman that will never vote for McShame and in little inexperienced VP Palin. I choose to vote Obama!!!! They make no sense and I am not living another 8 years with our country like this!!!

Woman for Obama/Biden!!!

NGC   September 3rd, 2008 1:22 pm ET

THIS IS POLITICS AND THE MEDIA. IF SHE HANDLE THE HEAT, THEN GET OUT OF THE KITCHEN

RS   September 3rd, 2008 1:22 pm ET

Wow, listen to them whine.

And play the gender card.

McCain and Team-Rove wanted the media frenzy of introducing someone new at the last minute, well this is part of that. If they didn't know that ahead of time, then they are even more clueless than they seem.

Not to mention... they really should have fully-vetted her. But hey, it's not like it was an important decision or anything.

Bruce   September 3rd, 2008 1:22 pm ET

I am tired of the constant negative ads run here in pa by McCain,,do not tell me why should not vote for Obama, tell me why i should vote for you. Apparently there are not any reasons as all the ads being run do nothing but bash the Dems, and offer nothing concrete form the Repubs. Now the media is looking at the VP nominee and sking questions, and there are no answers being given, just slams on the media and the reporting being "faux"...come on...if this was a Dem all of these issue would be raised and beat on.
McCain you cannot have it both ways...you want to go negative, not explain what you are going to do, or why we should vote for you, then expect the same when you make a bone headed choice like this for VP. Had you picked Ridge you would have won the election , but you caved to the special interests of the party, and now will pay for it. The move to bring a woman in to get the hillary voters was not what you needed to do, and everyone sees through it. Makes one wonder if Mc Cain acutally did have a hand in this or is just folllowing the people who advise him.
I was a Repub, but no more...I am independant and will cast my vote for the Dem's this time.

rodlang   September 3rd, 2008 1:22 pm ET

If Sarah Palin should put her family first and go home and take care of the kids...shouldn't Barack Obama also put his family first and go home and take care of the young daughters? Or are libs sexist.

Kevin, IN   September 3rd, 2008 1:22 pm ET

Yeah right... when a job interview isn't going well, claim there's a widespread conspiracy against you. That won't make you look nutty.

ginger   September 3rd, 2008 1:22 pm ET

Voters please do not fall for this crap!!!!

The Republicant's just want to draw attention away from her and John McCain.

Where's the outrage over Thompson calling Palin "ATTRACTIVE"

What a Joke!

Molly   September 3rd, 2008 1:22 pm ET

You want coverage now you've got it. Besides the media is reporting on facts...you would know that if you had vetted your candidate!

G Tippit   September 3rd, 2008 1:22 pm ET

McCain and Palin just dragged her poor daughter and hockey player boy into the limelight AGAIN. What pathetic people these two are! Now they are parading her daughter in cute maternity wear holding the hand of hockey boy as they all gather to get on McCain's bus. What a STUPID move. We could try to respect the painful situation this family finds itself in and leave them to deal with their personal issues, but NO, they've got to drag these children, CHILDREN, back in front of the cameras. What idiots.

Shannon   September 3rd, 2008 1:22 pm ET

I am so tired of this. Palin should never have got in the spotlight. McCain, Obama & Biden have been campaigning for close to two years. This woman comes in here less than a week and we the American people are suppose to except her as is. All I heard about was no one knew who Obama was. Put Senator Obama through scrutiny, and then this woman comes on the scene so perfect and "supposedly" reflective of family values and we should take her at face value.

People do your homework. Wait until the report comes out about "Troopergate". Palin is not a reformer. She is being used. She is being raked over the coals by a mean and vicious man name McShame. He didn't want her. She was his sloppy seconds and I mean just that. McShame and his camp is saying they had been vetting her for over 6 months. Well why in the hell are they up in Alaska trying to find out if there are more skeletons in the closet. As a woman I would have looked more closely at Palin if this appointment was truly a outright choice.

I am open to look at all the candidates. But I am voting for real change and a better truth than John "lying" McShame. I am very very very disappointed with the whole republican party. Shame on all of you.

FYI, where are the people of color (black, brown, yellow & red). I guess only white people are proud of their country.

Thank you republicans for making up my mind.

Obama/Biden 08 & 12

mae   September 3rd, 2008 1:22 pm ET

i think sarah palin is the right person for mccain and they will get my VOTE in nov......the media and some on cnn have gone to far.....it is NONE of there business about the daughter being pregnant....a lot of young girls get preg at 17 and not married LEAVE THEM ALONE and you media and cnn had better grow up.i have given up up cnn for wolf and mccafferty.....all they do is down the good people. you can almost see jack being sick on some of the shows as he don't know what he is talking about......tell him to quit the show and let someone with brains take his place
thank you

Gail   September 3rd, 2008 1:22 pm ET

Shows neither McCain or his Beauty Queen have the temperment and judgment to lead the Nation.

Such hypocrites.

Shrill for Hill   September 3rd, 2008 1:22 pm ET

The emperor has no clothes!

abc   September 3rd, 2008 1:22 pm ET

Hey so what! It's a political campaign and it's open season on the candidates. Scrutiny is appropriate.

Tim, Seattle   September 3rd, 2008 1:22 pm ET

Well, when you make a hasty and desperate pick, you will get vetted and scrutized. Welcome to the world of Karl Rove. Enjoy!

Obama/Biden 08'

Jean   September 3rd, 2008 1:22 pm ET

McCain did not do his job in vetting Sarah Palin. He has a lot of gall complaining when the Media does it. Someone has to look out for the interests of this country. She has been known to the people for less than a week and look at the all the stuff about her that was right on the surface for anyone to see, if they wanted to see it.
I saw a clip of a recent speech she gave in which she said the USA in Iraq was doing "God Work.' Some have compared her to Dan Quayle and admittedly, Dan Quayle did provide a lot of material for the late night comedians. However, never once did I worry if he became President that he would start a war to do "Gods Work". This woman is scary!

Anonymous   September 3rd, 2008 1:22 pm ET

Two words, Crocidile tears. Herr Schmidt's protestations might have more effect if they didn't come from the Rovian swift-boating John McCain's illegitimate black baby crowd.

stephanieasklof   September 3rd, 2008 1:22 pm ET

As a woman, what I DON'T want to hear about is whether or not a mother can hold office effectively; do NOT want poor Palin's business all over the front page. But please, please please – focus on issues and records. Question all candidates in regard to their stands on global warming, the horrible shape of the economy, the "war" on terror, education, creationism versus science, and so on and so on. I have noticed that when Republicans are asked such questions, they always answer with irrelevant sound-bites. The issues are so much bigger that what the media focuses on. Keep pressing on these issues, please.

Lousy at it   September 3rd, 2008 1:21 pm ET

Republicans like to prop themselves out to be rough tough, gun totin' cowboys. But when you throw a punch back they cry like little babies.

Turn out the lights. This one is over.

Travis   September 3rd, 2008 1:21 pm ET

You mean the media is actually doing its job?! Investigating and questioning a politician?!

John, a tip.

If you're going to base your campaign against your opponent based on his experience, don't pick someone who's less experience, untested, and UNDER INVESTIGATION FOR ETHICS CHARGES.

Old Fart   September 3rd, 2008 1:21 pm ET

At least they can't complain they're not getting media coverage.

Swe   September 3rd, 2008 1:21 pm ET

I am a Hillary Clinton Supporter. After Obama catch the normation I wasn't sure who to vote for. But after MaCain picked Sarah Palin, I am now 100% sure that I will vote for Obama. There is no way I will vote for creepy and freaky conservatives. I thought McCain was different but now I know that he is a rackless man who put first his interest to win the election rather than what he used to say "my country first". McCain, you have lost my vote because you picked the wrong running mate. If McCain-Palin win the election, I bet you America will be in worse shape than under Bush.

pamela   September 3rd, 2008 1:21 pm ET

Wait to see how she handles herself tonight before you string her up!
She may be just what America needs. Just because a Democrat says so doesn't make it true. America is better than this!!

baby mama   September 3rd, 2008 1:21 pm ET

never...never...under estimate just how slimy the Demorats can be

Max   September 3rd, 2008 1:21 pm ET

Please, you republican fools. You're talking about putting someone in charge as second in command, most likely will have to take command once McAncient kicks the bucket or becomes senile. With NO QUESTIONS ASKED. What country do you think this is, and do you seriously think Americans are that stupid, that they should just shut up because you say so. You must really hate America, or at least Americans.

randy   September 3rd, 2008 1:21 pm ET

Sarah Palin is an unknown to about 98% of this country. McCain and his party wants us to accept her based on their words only. Give me a break.

She needs to be scrutinized like everyone else. It's tough if you want to be in the White House. Stop your whining about her being treated unfairly.

Kyle   September 3rd, 2008 1:21 pm ET

I get it. So we're not allowed to question Palin. We're only allowed to question Democrats. And if anyone does question her, then it's sexism. So does that mean anyone questioning Obama is a racist? And can someone explain how Palin is so mouch more qualified than Obama? And despite what fox news and Cindy McCain may think, being the governor of a state next to Russia doesn't give you foreign policy experience. And did anyone watch Campbell Brown interview that mouthpiece Tucker Bounds? All she did was ask him what decisions Palin has made as governor and he couldn't do it. All she did was push to get an answer and Bounds just skated around the question the whole time. It's not the media's fault if the McCain campaign doesn't know anything about Palin.

david   September 3rd, 2008 1:21 pm ET

How stupid of mccain. So after they atack obama hourly, they dont expect the same from the media. They are trying to twist the story from another bad mccain decision to one that the media is against them. They know if they make this campaign about the issues, they lost this election. Anything to keep the issues out of the news.

qfnol31   September 3rd, 2008 1:21 pm ET

The argument isn't against the Obama campaign in the least, just the sexism of the new agencies.

This was noted as Hillary ran for the nomination and holds true for Palin, if not even worse.

The difference between the ads against Obama and his wife is that they weren't sponsored by the "nonpartisan" news. These attacks against Palin are not engineered by Obama (who actually called for an end to the attacks) but by those who are only "reporting" the news.

Colin   September 3rd, 2008 1:21 pm ET

First off, the Obama camp has leveled one attack against Palin. All they've done is respond to attacks against them. Secondly, the McCain campaign have said they wanted to shake things up and when they do, they get mad at the media. This is something that has turned me off towards the McCain campaign. Everytime McCain says something he doesn't mean, or does says something wrong, or everytime they get criticized, They blame it all on the media. They need to own the fact that they picked an unknown person. If you all remeber, Obama faced much more scrutiny than Palin when it came to his life. For 2 weeks we couldn't stop talking about his pastor. The media reports the news and Palin is the news right now. I am waiting for a big time columnist to strike back viciously. I don't know who Palin is and that is what the media is trying tofigure out.

Jean   September 3rd, 2008 1:21 pm ET

Weeellll.....
As the RNC's first full day's convention message, and some McCain supporters to this thread have it, if you're not Republican, you're not American. If you're not with US, you're not on God's side. If you're not with US, but support the opposition, you're a COMMUNIST.

Can we say McCarthyism, 1950s? Or more accurately, Nuremberg Party Rallies, Germany, 1927-1939?

Jon   September 3rd, 2008 1:21 pm ET

I don't watch TV news; I read one newspaper and CNN online. And yet, water cooler talk focuses on McCain's pick of Palin. Why? It has little to do with the media, and more with a desire to understand the decision. Sure, blame it on the media, try to get them to stop printing stories-but that won't stop the talk.

I still cannot picture Palin as Commander in Chief. I could picture Hillary, or McCain, or Obama, or Biden. I haven't heard one argument yet to change that picture.

Anonymous   September 3rd, 2008 1:21 pm ET

Steve Schmidt and the McCain campaign don't seem to understand that in a society with a free press, the candidates do not get to declare that a topic – be it nonsense or otherwise – is over. Take the hits, guys.

And Democrats, please drop the inexperience argument. Besides being obvious, it's the weakest attack available against Sarah Palin. We don't need to go after her lack of experience or her personal family problems when she's simply wrong on every issue that truly matters in this election.

Southern Girl   September 3rd, 2008 1:21 pm ET

I love when they compare Palin to Obama! It makes him look like a saint.

Nick Smith, New York, NY   September 3rd, 2008 1:21 pm ET

This guy is a joke. Had he and his people did a better job, he wouldn't have to face this media skewering. THe fact is, they are placing a person a heartbeat away from the Presidency, when she has ZERO foerign policy experience, and this presidential campaign the next Presidency will center on foreign policy: ending Iraq, and redoubling efforts in Afghanistan. Not to mention the economy and the host of other issues that Palin has shown no experience for. No one is asking this if Obama because, as Bill Clinton said, he's ready. What a BAD pick McCain. You really should have went with Pawlenty or Romney.

Ex GOPer   September 3rd, 2008 1:21 pm ET

Ready For Change – "I don't actually remember anyone asking Obama how he felt about putting his young children in harms way by running for president, or how he was going to juggle raising two small children with him as a perpetual candidate and Michelle as a full time working mom.

Imagine that……….."

Tell me who is bringing these questions to the campaign other then the GOP trying to deflect actual questions on issues and I'll help you protest and organize against them. These are not the issues being brought up and questioned. The issues are McCain's judgement is picking a PERSON with at best less experience then Obama after running the entire campaign on the premise of "ready to lead". The other issues such as her daughter having a baby does lead to a legitamate debate on sex education. Her first speach to the American people said she said thanks but no thanks to the bridge to now where to congress. Guess what she took the money from congress. She said no to earmarks guess what she hired a lobbyist to get 27 million for her small town. She is a political "outsider" but yet she is closely related to Senater Ted Stevens who is responsible for those earmarks and chaired in all things his 527 political campaign committee. These are real issues!!!!!!

ostriches burying our heads in the sand   September 3rd, 2008 1:21 pm ET

Looks like the McCain campaign is run by a bunch of whiners!!! As the saying goes "empty vessels make too much noise".....

DB   September 3rd, 2008 1:21 pm ET

Roland Martin has written a substantive analysis on teen pregnancy. If anyone wants to read a sober unpartisan view from someone with journalistic integrity, I encourage you to read it.

Mary   September 3rd, 2008 1:20 pm ET

temper, temper! careful mccain that temper starting to surface.

Donna   September 3rd, 2008 1:20 pm ET

""The McCain campaign will have no further comment about our long and thorough process. This nonsense is over. .The American people get to do the vetting now on Election Day – November 4th.""

Nothing to see here...move along.

Don't think that's going to happen Steve.

Frankly, if you and your buddies had done your job, we most likely wouldn't be discovering these things about Ms. Palin the hard way. Course, if you people had done your jobs, McCain would have picked someone else.

Bob   September 3rd, 2008 1:20 pm ET

Typical of CNN. It is so beholden to the democrats that it doesn't even try to be impartial anymore.

Republicans Hate America   September 3rd, 2008 1:20 pm ET

I say keep attacking and feed these losers a taste of their own medicine for a change im so sick of how they cry when they dont get the media to lie for them.

LT for Obama   September 3rd, 2008 1:20 pm ET

Molly,

First of all, it is obvious you have not researched this qualified lady because if you had, you would realize that there is a lot more going on with her other than she is about to become a grandmother.

As for your asinine comments about who is watching Obama's kids, pay attention, Michelle is home a lot and when she is campaigning, her mother is there with the children. Had you been watching and LISTENING, you would have known this like the rest of America.

geno   September 3rd, 2008 1:20 pm ET

give me a break .... the media is doing there job ... someone explains to be how come we saw there is gender bias in this case and it's wrong ..but if you get a divorce from your wife, the wife almost always get the kids, and that's OK! ....
How come it's OK in this case and not OK in the VP's case? ..Just curious

Don   September 3rd, 2008 1:20 pm ET

Quit it John, Sarah Palin calls it whinning!!!

Jim   September 3rd, 2008 1:20 pm ET

Maybe it's just me, but when she talks, she sounds like Margie from the movie Fargo competing in the Miss America pageant.

"So I told Congress, thanks but no thanks on the bridge to nowhere"

YEAH RIGHT   September 3rd, 2008 1:20 pm ET

DONT GET IT TWISTED!!!!! McCAIN PICKED PALIN TO GET HILLARYS VOTES POINT BLANK. ALL THAT OTHER #@IT IS WATER UNDER THE BRIDGE. HE PROBABLY GAVE HER A CALL LIKE, "IS THERE A-N-Y THING WE CAN DO TO GET YOU ON THE TICKET "HILL" A-N-Y-T-H-I-N-G!!!!'

Paul Dobro   September 3rd, 2008 1:20 pm ET

If Palin's executive experiance trumps that of Obama since Obama has never had to be the leader as a state and federal congressman, what does it say about McCain's executive experiance since he ALSO has never been anywhere but in Congress?

Brian   September 3rd, 2008 1:20 pm ET

I'm taking my ball and going home!!!

Tyler   September 3rd, 2008 1:20 pm ET

The only way to save this country is to vote every republican out of office.
The last 8 years have been nothing but a constant wave of lies that have destroyed our rights and liberties, tanked our economy and worst of all have killed thousands of honorable men and women serving in our military in an unjust war that was waged on the biggest lie of the 21st century.

Billy J Austin,TX   September 3rd, 2008 1:19 pm ET

Dems better come up with a way to fight the buzz words and martyr syndrome that the Republicans are trotting out. That is how they beat them EVERY presidential election since Reagan. Except for the two times that Bill Clinton's team fought back effectively. This is not the time for Obama's team to act like Kerry or Gore. Get hold of Bill (not Hillary's campaign) and work this out!! Our nation is in peril. I know that sounds like something out of 'their' playbook, but I honestly feel we are at a true crossroad right now.

Ann   September 3rd, 2008 1:19 pm ET

Correct me if I am wrong, but Obama and his campaign staff have NOTHING to do with this.

The American people are asking the questions and digging into her past – since the Republican campaign obviously didn't bother to do so.

I also think McCain & Co. should issue a public apology to Obama and family for the smears they were using to attack him.

All's fair is love and politics, and you can't have it both ways.

Bunch of hypocritical, racist, right-wing evangelical jerks.

POST IT CNN!

SB for BO   September 3rd, 2008 1:19 pm ET

If the McCan't camp can't stand the heat, you know the rest....Obama has been questioned so many times about HOT issues and has managed to handle the media pressure/scrutiny/bias with grace. In fact, he even wanted to squash the whole pregnancy argument. If he can handle it, they should be able too. Play with the big boys and you have to take it like the big boys....

For Abby, the voters vetted Obama!!! Too bad you didn't have the same opportunity with Palin. Most of all, I hate that her family has to deal with this. Remember, she can step aside at any time. She's not forced to be his running mate. Decide which is more important: serving your family or serving the Repulicans? She can have both, but it doens't have to be on the world stage!!!

Kim   September 3rd, 2008 1:19 pm ET

I always knew the Media was full of Democrats and providing us the pro-democratic point of view, but this takes the cake!! The only thing they can find on her is the fact that her daughter is pregnant. WOW talking about reaching!! She is currently running a state with a $10 billion dollar budget and Obama being a one term senator. But than again she is the VP candidate not the Presidential Candidate. The combined experience of McCain and Palin out does Obama and Biden any day of the week.

My vote will continue to be with McCain not a guy who can not make up his mind or one that does not have a proven track record of loving his country and demonstrating how he is proud to be an American as McCain has!

Maureen / California   September 3rd, 2008 1:19 pm ET

Since when is it sexist to question a candidates' credentials? There is a reason that the Republicans NEED to pretend that sexism is the reason that Palins' credentials are being questioned. They need this spin because they have no answers to the questions asked of them on Palin by the journalists. I have witnessed it several times over the past few days. Tucker Bounds dodged SIMPLE questions asked of him by Campbell Brown two days ago. It was funny. He later cried about this to McCain who then announced that he was cancelling an appearance on Larry King. That is hilarious!!! Also, the Republicans are blaming the media for even discussing the pregnancy of her daughter. But Sarah Palin and the Reps are making a point to tell the media that they are proud of her choice to keep the baby and get married to the high school boy that is the father. By making this religious/political statement, they are opening the door for debate. They can't have it both ways. By the way, I voted for Hillary and I do not think that she lost because of sexism. But sexism does exist and It is a shame that the Republicans are making a mockery of it.

Kim   September 3rd, 2008 1:19 pm ET

Actually, a lot of people have some real concerns about Gov. Palin and her so called "experience." So, the media has every right to look into her background and ask the appropriate questions. And there are a lot of questions!

Tim   September 3rd, 2008 1:19 pm ET

McCain just Mavericked himself out of the White House. It's just like the war in Iraq, he couldn't admit he was wrong then either.

Obama/Biden 08/12!!!

Mark K   September 3rd, 2008 1:19 pm ET

Steve Schmidt looks like the thug he is. I hope the press does not cave in to this intimidation. What Schmidt is in essence saying is, "The McCain campaign vetted Sarah Palin, so you just have to take our word for it and stop investigating". After all, we are the Deciders.

HoldenLitgo   September 3rd, 2008 1:19 pm ET

Go Republicans '08! Accountability – not then, not now, no how!

a southern bell   September 3rd, 2008 1:19 pm ET

IT'S THE MEDIAS FAULT !!

PICKING PALIN IS ALSO THE MEDIA'S FAULT.

ANOTHER GRAND DECISION BY THE

GRAND WIZARD OF BAD DECISIONS.

sandy   September 3rd, 2008 1:19 pm ET

Schmidt is Rove Part2. Apparently he is not as smart as Rove. He has goofed up big time with Palin pick.

And now he blames everybody else except themselves.

rayofhope   September 3rd, 2008 1:19 pm ET

If you don't want the media scrutiny, don't try to treat the American public like idiots and put UNQUALIFIED people in line for the Presidency..... I'm insulted...not because she is a woman but because she is UNQUALIFIED!!!!

At least with the other viable Republican VP candidates you had a sense of security in that they AT LEAST had an idea as to what they were facing.

With the concern over Mr. McCain's age you'd think his pick would show he is truly thinking about what's best for America and NOT who the Republicans need at the top to get OIL OUT OF ALASKA!!!!!

Melvin   September 3rd, 2008 1:19 pm ET

All of you McCain people never complained about the New Yorker that had Barack and Michelle looking like terrorist. Do you all expect a double standard?

Daryl in Seattle   September 3rd, 2008 1:19 pm ET

Yeah, you vetted the OTHER candidates thoroughly, but she was a last minute choice. Funny how they always blitz the media if it's not covering them in the fashion they would prefer. This isn't a photo shoot Republicans. You don't get to come out however you want and then pick how you would like to be shown to the world. You made your bed, now sleep in it.

Kathy   September 3rd, 2008 1:19 pm ET

Are you people serious? If the shoe were on the other foot, and this kind of news was coming out concerning the Dems, you would be all over it, 24/7. And furthermore, just because she is a woman, does that mean that the media is picking on her? What's happening to the brains of the people in this country? Can't anyone think for themself? Do you just have to repeat the last thing that you heard? Shameful and very frightening.

Oh boy....   September 3rd, 2008 1:18 pm ET

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH................... ENOUGH IS ENOUGH..................
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH....................ENOUGH IS ENOUGH..................

Lets be real American, both campaigns have been doing the same thing (TIC FOR TAC). It only hurts the Republicans because they pick an unknown as the VP candidate so of course the media and American citizens will attempt to do their own research on Palin especially since a top aide to McCain confirmed that he only met her once. This does raise the vetting question and rightfully so. This also highlights McCain's age. Americans must make sure that his VP is vetted properly as McCain age is against him and there is a chance that Palin will have to step in to be President.

For Obama, it is correct to say he doesn't have any executive experience; however, it is unfair to say that he doesn't have any expereince. As a community organizer, IL Senate & US Senate and not to mention his education, he does have some experience. THOSE THAT SUPPORT OR BUY INTO THE AGRUMENT THAT OBAMA DOES NOT HAVE EXECUTIVE EXPERIENCE SHOULD BE VERY CAREFUL AS THE NUMBER ONE ON THE REPUBLICAN TICKET DOESN'T HAVE ANY EXECUTIVE EXPERIENCE EITHER.

LYNETTE IN CA   September 3rd, 2008 1:18 pm ET

"The McCain campaign will have no further comment about our long and thorough process. This nonsense is over. .The American people get to do the vetting now on Election Day – November 4th."

THAT'S THE DUMBEST THING I'VE EVER HEARD!!!

If the McSame campaign didn't vet her, it's not our job to do it. Now, you have to suffer the consequences.

OBAMA / BIDEN '08

Cathy in Vermont   September 3rd, 2008 1:18 pm ET

This is ridiculous. She is an unknown at the national level. The McCain camp is missing the boat in better defining her and perhaps should have done a more thorough vetting. They have made a major mistake in allowing the press to define Sarah Palin rather than doing so more thoroughly themselves. When are they going to take her out of this cocoon they have placed her in and let her speak to the media and the American people to define herself and her positions??

Charmin -IL   September 3rd, 2008 1:18 pm ET

I'm a Obama supporter. But, I find it quite insulting that as a women that this is the best that the Republicans is saying they have to offer in terms of a qualified female for Vice President. I'm not a fan of the Republican party but I am certain that they have someone more qualified than Palin.

Stephen G   September 3rd, 2008 1:18 pm ET

Interesting thing I found while doing research on interview questions - I searched from the CNN Web page "Illegal Interview Questions" and found an Article in the Washington Times – "38 Illegal, Sensitive, and Stupid Interview Questions...and How to Respond"

Some in the list:
What child care arrangements have you made?

This job has always been handled by a (female) (male). Do you think you can handle it?

Do you plan to have any more children?

I guess now it is OK to ask these questions, eh?

RYAN kr Jr   September 3rd, 2008 1:18 pm ET

CNN, most people 're not interestd in watching old creepy delusional John McCain; anytime he or surrogates open mouth is all about war, war, surge,surge, Pow,pow, bomb, bomb, i am bored,bored. with John McCain. My family and my friends turn off the tv anytime he is on Tv. or speaking.

Independent Voter to Democratic Voter   September 3rd, 2008 1:18 pm ET

I look at this in the only way that seems fair to me. Ms. Palin was not truely vetting in this process. This goes to the true judgement of McCain. He will allow someone else to run the country for him. If you notice, HE should be the one defending his choice, not his campaign staff!! He is the one who stated that he only met her one time before selecting her has has VP choice. I can't vote for someone who goes with his "gut" feelings versus the facts. Obama has my vote.

Carol   September 3rd, 2008 1:18 pm ET

The press didn't choose her – they did. Now they're stuck with her.

I think "maverick" is a nice way of saying "senile".

disgusted   September 3rd, 2008 1:18 pm ET

Whatever. If you run for president or vice president, you face scrutiny. That's the reality of the situation. Palin should be able to step in at some point and say "My children are off limits. Don't touch them, that's irresponsible reporting."

Similarly, if she uses her pregnant 17 year old as a shield......well that's a very unethical way to get votes.

CNN- stay civil, and just do your job as journalists, not as speculative journalists. There's no crystal ball, even if you think there is.

Spirit of America   September 3rd, 2008 1:18 pm ET

The good thing about this whole election is that, finally, America is guaranteed either her first black president or first woman vice president. It will be a referendum on which force of hate, racism or sexism, is stronger. The Democratic primary proved it was sexism.
The general election may just reverse that outcome.

Steve A. , New Braunfels , Texas   September 3rd, 2008 1:18 pm ET

she is just going to have to live with it ,it go's with the turf . If they don't like it they should n't have chosen her, too late now.

Stacy from Loudoun, VA   September 3rd, 2008 1:18 pm ET

The more they yell, change the subject, sequester the nominee, don’t address the questions, smear the other candidate, blame the media, and lie, they more the media is going to attack and rightfully so. These symptoms are signs of a smokescreen or cover up.

Rachelbsw   September 3rd, 2008 1:18 pm ET

This is politics. The McCain campaign is only making things seem worse by sounding so paranoid. This is NOT because she is a female. The MEDIA hounded Obama for weeks straight during this campaign because they said he was new. She has only been the top news story for a few days. This is what happens when you pick a complete unknown.

Stop being so paranoid McCain.

Obama 08

nate   September 3rd, 2008 1:18 pm ET

BOTH parents should be around taking care of the 5 kids when they have so many issues going on. I know my family would...

Diana   September 3rd, 2008 1:18 pm ET

The democrats are the ones always crying wolf...always looking for something no matter how small and trivia

Jon151   September 3rd, 2008 1:18 pm ET

You know they know they are in trouble when they start lieing through their teeth like that. MCSAME VISITED HER ONCE!! HE WAS JUST ROLLING THE DICE MCCAIN STYLE, this is what you have to look forward to America if you elect this parasite.

USMC Mike   September 3rd, 2008 1:18 pm ET

Abby says:
"Let's all question OBama – he seems to be a Fraud – he will never be elected. Did the DNC vet this guy????"

Ummm, they didn't have to; over 18million americans did ...

john berkhoudt   September 3rd, 2008 1:17 pm ET

Is there anything to the claim that Sarah was NOT Miss Congeniality as another contesrtant claims is hers? Or, that Sarah was pregnant when she and her husband eloped?

And since when is "do as I say, not as I do", "straight talk" fair????

Why haven't we heard anything more about the racist claim Bristol's boyfriend made on his MySpace page, before it was shut down? If they are bringing him down for a photo-op, isn't it fair to ask him about that, and his language, AND his comment about "not wanting a kid"?

I'm just saying   September 3rd, 2008 1:17 pm ET

seriusly. I think that since we the people werent given a opportunity to have information until the senator picked gov palin that we should be allowed to question things now.

NG in DC   September 3rd, 2008 1:17 pm ET

The media is doing it's job trying to figure out who the heck she is and why the hell she should be even considered for this position.

I hear she's hardly left the country – I wonder if she's spent much time outside of the woods of Alaska.

Gimme a break. I will NEVER EVER trust John McCain again.

PUMA for Obama since Palin!

Frank Odia   September 3rd, 2008 1:17 pm ET

As voters we have to have the right to ask questions about the qualifications of a future president of the United States. The position is too important to choose any of them with blinders on.

Napoleon Complex   September 3rd, 2008 1:17 pm ET

This is about John McCain's lack of judgment in selecting an inexperienced ultra right-wing person to serve as VP. If Obama had selected some unknown left-wing Governor (or even Tim Kaine) he would have been skewered by the Republicans and the media. The fact that Palin admitted that she had "rhetorical" conversations about removing certain books from the Wasilla library is fair game. The public has a right to know about these kinds of things in order to make an informed decision. Who would want someone like that in the WH? She apparently has as much disregard for the Constitution as the Bush/Cheney crowd.

The Lady   September 3rd, 2008 1:17 pm ET

The RNC wants to whine about Palin being attacked but they have been attacking Obama like a pit bull with two sets of teeth. If Your VP can not take the life of a politician maybe she is in the wrong business.I am a woman and I would like to see a woman for either president or VP that can dish it out and take it, suck it up lady and be a VP or else step aside and let someone who can handle it step up.

Erik   September 3rd, 2008 1:17 pm ET

How can Schmidt say she was subjected to a "rigorous vetting process" when other McCain aides say Palin wasn't interviewed by the campaign until Wednesday of last week? And that McCain himself didn't interview Palin until the day he offered her the job? The two stories don't match.

Olivia   September 3rd, 2008 1:17 pm ET

The vetting process was a long and difficult selection on who would look better on cover of magazine. Poor judgement from McCain. THIS IS TRULLY SCARY!

cevans, tx   September 3rd, 2008 1:17 pm ET

Abby,

You have done nothing but bash Obama and his entire compaign. Whatever happened to morals and the truth? Some of you McCain supporters are pathetic. All you have had are negative comments. You can't even be true to yourself. McCain don't know what the H- he's doing. His VP pick is going to back fire on him.
NO WAY, NO HOW, NO MCCAIN!!

OBAMA FOR PRESIDENT!!!

Minerva-Nashua   September 3rd, 2008 1:17 pm ET

Miss Congeniality will be fine. I'm sure she has "people" to take care of her special needs child and teenage daughter's trauma. The thing about beauty contests is that you learn grace under pressure and can deliver a good speech when required.

Klearwater   September 3rd, 2008 1:17 pm ET

I just love these pathetic, I'll show you...I'll kill me Clintonistas. Like bad dog food, they'll be taken off the shelves come November with the rest of what is becoming an irrelevent republican party.

joey   September 3rd, 2008 1:17 pm ET

wait a second. all summer long, mccain complains about the fact that obama gets ALL the media attention. with that attention, obama got some favorable and some unfavorable coverage.
now that mccain is getting the media attention, he doesn't like it? what did he expect by unloading a surprise VP pick that had not been vetted by his campaign or the media? come on mccain, if you want media attention, you have to accept what negative comes of it.
it's disappointing how much of a typical republican you are turning out to be.
i miss the maverick from 2000.

BC FOR OBAMA   September 3rd, 2008 1:17 pm ET

ABBY- September 3rd, 2008 12:18 pm ET

The DEMS and obama gang better Back Off the GOV Palin bashing -the treatment of this Qualified Woman is now abusive.
Let's all question OBama – he seems to be a Fraud – he will never be elected. Did the DNC vet this guy????

The DNC doesn't have to vet OBAMA because he was elected by more than 18 million americans.

Obama 08, 12

RealityKing   September 3rd, 2008 1:17 pm ET

And it's not just about the corrupt news their reporting. "Monitoring" the oppositions voice is an effect way of letting others hate for you. Again what we see here..

gc   September 3rd, 2008 1:16 pm ET

The media along with everyone else that gave this pick a second thought was shocked by McCains lack of judgement and hastey decision to choose his VP. I am sure she is a nice woman with a career but that has noghting to do with her qualifications for VP. This shows how rash McCain would be with our countries decisions.

Chip   September 3rd, 2008 1:16 pm ET

The liberals have such arrogance to think that because THEY did not know Sarah Palin, that she came from nowhere and was not "properly" vetted. I'm just a dude who reads the news and even I knew about Sarah Palin being on the list of possible VPs for months! And she was one of my favorites! Perhaps I just pay attention.

No Hillary = No Obama   September 3rd, 2008 1:16 pm ET

This is just same song, 2nd verse – it's sexism masquerading as "analysis"; as critique, as interrogation. It's Hillary redux. Those talking Obama hires at CNN, MSNBC & NBC better watch their mouths – as should Hoody Doody (Obama) and Jabbering Joe (Biden) -slips of the tonuge, gender bashing will backfire big time – again Hillary Clinton paved the way – took the hits and Sarah Palin will reap the benefits. You go girl!

USMC Mike   September 3rd, 2008 1:16 pm ET

LOL

The GoP is in a tailspin ... The party itself may not make it to 2012 ... McCain's poor judgement and Palin may have sunk the party for a long, long time ...

McCain like to say he's a maverick, but he completely caved to the zealots in the party to avoid nominating Romney (mormon), Leiberman (dem), or Crist (gay)...All much better candidates than this yahoo he picked ...

The GoP gets what they deserve ... She should have turned McCain down outright when he asked her ... She is not a very good politician, she knew this and now the more important things like "god's will" being behind a pipeline or the Iraq War would surface....Or that she was all about earmarks and the bridge to nowhere before last week...

The religious movement tore the GoP apart and Regan is to blame for the Messy divorce that will happen after this Nov ... He ruined, not saved the GoP

Diana   September 3rd, 2008 1:16 pm ET

In my opinion no party has more skeltons in their closet than the democrats

Kelley   September 3rd, 2008 1:16 pm ET

She's destroying herself.

sherry for Obama   September 3rd, 2008 1:16 pm ET

Palin is her own worst enemy.
She is not fit or experienced to be VP or President.
She has a lot of unresolved issues in her family that she needs to address and take care of.
The republican party needs to wake up and realize that Sen. McCain made a poor choice in choosing Sarah Palin.

The right choice ...the only choice.....Obama / Biden 08

Benjamin   September 3rd, 2008 1:16 pm ET

It's not like the media didn't already destroy Hillary Clinton.

Old Fart   September 3rd, 2008 1:16 pm ET

It's true. After a long and thorough search, they gave up and just went with her.

Wait, can I say "her" or does that make me a sexist?

McCain: putting the "Old" in Grand Old Party.

doris   September 3rd, 2008 1:16 pm ET

What tickles me pink (and I am a dark-skinned African-American women–so that's a lot of ticklin) is the fact that the journalists and media asks these governors, senators and high minded republicans "Is Sarah Palin ready to be Vice-President"? What do they expect them to say – NO, SHE REALLY ISN'T!!! The media must think Americans are the dumbest people in all the world [and would be if we elected McCain/Palin]. The repugs can chant, talk, and spin Palin all they want to, but we smart people AIN'T BUYIN!!!

PK   September 3rd, 2008 1:16 pm ET

McCain camp is whiners & cry babies and can't handle the kind of stuff that they are famous in doing to others. If they can't handle this what makes you think McCain can handle being president? This reveals McCain's changing character, no sense of judgement and a man who will at anytime do off the wall things that can put America in danger if he becomes president. McCain's mental state needs to be check. He needs to see a doctor. He's in his own world. I guess that's why they call him "maverick" or in other words a "loaner" one who can only see and do what he wants. I guess McCain has not realized yet that America is made up of people, not just himself.

Can someone take McCain to the doctor?

Niko   September 3rd, 2008 1:16 pm ET

What a joke. He just did us Dems a favor. Thanks McCain....we appreciate it! I guess my 12 year old could be a VP candidate too...Ha!

Obama/Biden 08'

jfffnn   September 3rd, 2008 1:16 pm ET

It seems that Gov. Palin was picked so she would be dragged thru the mud to the point of leaving the ticket.That way Insane McSame will choose either Joe lieberman or Tom Ridge, which is who he wanted in the first place.

Shari, NY   September 3rd, 2008 1:15 pm ET

Ahhh the media – not Obama this time. Gracias a dios! Grace a dieu!
THANK GOD!

Well, Obama haters, this is the same media that painted the pictures of Obama you remember too well.

ConsiderThis, FL   September 3rd, 2008 1:15 pm ET

No polititian has been more scrutinized and viciously attacked by the media, Hannity and Limbaugh types than Sen. Obama. The Republicans are criminally vicious (most of them should be behind bars) and in any other country, they would be! I have one question: Americans, what else do the republicans have to do to you, your family, finances, hopes and dreams before you'll kick the bums out?

john   September 3rd, 2008 1:15 pm ET

The vast majority of experienced voting adult Americans, are sick and tired of the lawyers, strategists, polsters, party loyalists and talk radio morons trying to dumb us down. Quit blaming the media for reporting facts. If it smells fishy, it`s probably worth looking into. Most are aware of the blatant lies sent via e-mail and can access facts through Snopes or other reliable fact finding sites. Palin is not the reformer she is portrayed to be. The charges and facts provided to the media and public are from a fellow Alaskan and Republican named Andrew Halcro. His web site seems to be unbiased and worth a visit to those that have doubts. As voters, we won`t be fooled into believing that the media is out to get someone. If you want fair and balanced news, watch P.B.S. I watched and listened to the Dems. now I`m watching the Rep. without all of the talking heads and bias.

Todd M   September 3rd, 2008 1:15 pm ET

Abby, It's not the dems. It's the press. They don't like to surprised. When you push, they push back more. Take it and let it blow over otherwise you will get caught in the tornado.

Mary   September 3rd, 2008 1:15 pm ET

temper temper-hmm McCain your temper is beaming through your surrogates.

A, Los Angeles   September 3rd, 2008 1:15 pm ET

"exceeds, by far, the governing accomplishments of Senator Obama"

Well, by that measure, she also far exceeds, by far, the governing accomplishments of Senator McCain. Maybe she should be President and McCain the VP.

The McCain camp is full of oxymorons and spin that at this point they wouldn't be able to taste the difference of sweet from sour.

Indiana Voter   September 3rd, 2008 1:15 pm ET

Steve Schmidt isn't doing much for his resume when he starts job hunting after November.

Vetting NC   September 3rd, 2008 1:15 pm ET

The old Karl Rove gestapo tactics at work. If you screw up, become the victim and attack the "enemy."

Also, what a joke when they claim the media has given Obama a break. The media and McSame have accused him of everything from treason to being a terrorist.

You made the mistake schmidt... did you think people were just going to take your word on how great she was? John himself didn't even know her until a day before she was announced. This was your hand picked offering to the right wing religious crowd. This was never John's... which shows just how pathetically weak he is.

Just remember folks... the answer to everything is "cowboy swagger."

Sue   September 3rd, 2008 1:15 pm ET

So being a POW and a Senator with no executive experience qualifies McClueless to be president?

The Republican Thugs can't stand having done to them what they do so well.

Scooterpdx   September 3rd, 2008 1:15 pm ET

How could they complain about the scrutiny of his VP choice? She could be heartbeat away from the presidency! Of course she needs to be scrutinized especially since she came out of left field. It sounds like Republicans are using the gender card by expecting softer treatment by the media because she's a woman. You can't have it both ways.

Also, I would not call Palin a "reformer" nor would I call McCain a "maverick." Those are PR labels. Look at their records. They don't deserve either label.

I think it's sad that people believe that Palin is qualified as VP. Be real. Stop regurgitating the talking points and think about the country.

oh my   September 3rd, 2008 1:15 pm ET

and FYI...the McCain campaign put out the info about her daughter...NOT the media and NOT Obama...now you want to be the victim...another reason why America does not like Repugs

Craig A Texas Democrat   September 3rd, 2008 1:15 pm ET

Oh but it was ok when the media was slamming Obama 24 hours a day what cry babies. If they were more sensitive to Obama during his media crucifixion i might think they have a point but anyways KICK THE BUMS OUT THE WHITE HOUSE.

Dean in Florida   September 3rd, 2008 1:15 pm ET

The Democrats cannot tout Obama's record (virtually none)...
or Biden's record (or his character comes into play)...
or McCain's record (it overshadows Obama's)...
or Palin's (it overshadows Obama's)...
so they attack Palin's character.

The American voter does not appreciate this tactic. They want candidates to discuss their accomplishments. McCain does this because he can. Obama cannot do the same. They want candidates who have a realistic vision for the future of the United States. McCain does. Obama does not.

Obama supporters...remind me again why you support this chump!

I don't want my name listed   September 3rd, 2008 1:15 pm ET

The Republicans seem quite paranoid. They seem to operate out of fear and guilt. Why wouldn't the media give all the information possible in all forms? Isn't that the media's job?

Confused in PA   September 3rd, 2008 1:15 pm ET

"Governor Sarah Palin is an exceptional governor with a record of accomplishment that exceeds, by far, the governing accomplishments of Senator Obama," wrote senior adviser Steve Schmidt in a memo sent to reporters Wednesday morning.

I guess the media would let it go if there were any specifics given, instead of the grand statements, as if they are fact. If Palin is more qualified, give specific examples. Give examples of her record of accomplishment. What has she accomplished?

And why does every statement of distorted fact always end with a negative slam on Senator Obama?

JustCheck   September 3rd, 2008 1:14 pm ET

I hear Oliver Stone will be recasting his new movie W. The part of Sarah Palin will be played by a third string understudy whose only claim to fame was having done two nights of "The Iceman Cometh" opposite Yacov Smirnov at Branson Community College theater.

Maria   September 3rd, 2008 1:14 pm ET

Well if SOMEONE would have done their homework and checked out Sarah, the press wouldn't have much to do, would they? Book banning in the local Wasilla library, using bully techniques and firing anyone who steps out of line, (play by my rules or I take my hockey puck and YOU go home style...) I don't know... The job of the press is to ask questions...

BUT seriously, I just read on another website that Cheney is visiting Russia's neighbor and I thought, 'gee, what is Cheney doing in Alaska? Hunting?', hee hee! Of course, that isn't where he is.... but it was FUNNY- thanks to the republican way of thinking and Russia being next to Alaska was used as proof Sarah can handle being VP. This IS silly season.... never heard so much silly before this republican season!

D   September 3rd, 2008 1:14 pm ET

HAVE YOU EVER SEEN A COMPANY HIRE SOMEONE WITH OUT INTERVIEWING THEM A FEW TIME? WELL JOHN MCCAIN DID NOT DO THIS FOR THE POSITION OF VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. AYFKMK

paul oregon   September 3rd, 2008 1:14 pm ET

palin has ahistory of firing people if they dont agree with her .
mcbush throws a hissy if he thinks people dont agree with him.
typical repub. party thinking. people we will do the thinking for you
trust us. we know whats best you! my way or the highway you ungrate full people how dare you question me

misanthropicus   September 3rd, 2008 1:14 pm ET

Palin won her position by fighting corruption – Obama won his position by embracing corruption.

By the way, CAN we see at least ONE of this brilliant legal scholar's papers? After all, two years of Harvard Review and six of Chicago Law teaching produced enough evidence that he is not just an air-bag.

shahid   September 3rd, 2008 1:14 pm ET

There're so many evidences that the media is biased either intentionally or by curiosity. I watched both the DNC and RNC. During DNC, there were no reporters to respond negatively after each speech. But during RNC, more than half of the reporters/commentators in the convention center attacking negatively right after each speech. I tried not to be biased, but I felt injustice up to the point that Democrats actually lavishly paid the media with their surplus cash that they got for the campaign.

Kel in Auburn, AL   September 3rd, 2008 1:14 pm ET

After attacking Obama's WIFE, these people want to cry foul over the media actually doing their job for once and scrutinizing someone who may be the next Vice President of the United States. I think the people that make up the McCain campaign constitute this "Nation of Whiners" we've heard so much about.

Pathetic. Just Pathetic.

SBF For McCain   September 3rd, 2008 1:14 pm ET

Get the facts for yourself or use C-Span........I will be voting for McCain. The Dems have shot themselves in the foot again by pushing Obama based on race and the fact that they get 90% of the African American voters. They're not getting mine.

Obama has a lot to accomplish politically and does not need Pelosi and Dean dictating to him. When this is over win or lose Obama needs to get rid of some of the people around him. He's a good man.

I will still be voting for McCain.

Jo Ann   September 3rd, 2008 1:14 pm ET

I am an Independent voter, but I think that the McCain camp is right about this. CNN shamelessly reported on the rumor that Palin's baby was her daughter's child without any corroberating evidence whatsoever.

In contrast, when questioned about why they waited to report on the Edwards sex scandal CNN political director Sam Feist told the NYT that “you have to have some sort of evidence before you put something on the air.” Why didn't they show the same restraint with the Palin rumor?

It was obviously because they saw an irresistible opportunity to make points for Obama so they threw their integrity out the window.

Republicans Hate America   September 3rd, 2008 1:14 pm ET

what about you scumbag repugs when you go after Michelle Obama and she is not running? you hypocrites make me want to vomit everytime

Mr. Eko   September 3rd, 2008 1:14 pm ET

"Executive" is just their buzzword to try to spin her inexperience into something meaningful. But here's another buzzword for you: "FEDERAL". Sarah Palin has NO EXPERIENCE AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL.

And she doesn't know ANYTHING about foreign policy. How can you choose a VP in a time of WAR who knows nothing about foreign policy??? Obama has already prove his grasp of foreign policy by being right about Iraq, Afghanistan, and Iran.

Jessica in IL   September 3rd, 2008 1:14 pm ET

WHATEVER.

Obama '08

Mike   September 3rd, 2008 1:14 pm ET

Mr Schmidt has coined a new word – exceptionalism. Is he taking lessons from the great Decider? My wife reminded me that we drove thru Wasilla on a vacation in Alaska. I don't remember the town but I don't see governing it is in the same universe as being VP of the US of A much less being President.

Diane   September 3rd, 2008 1:14 pm ET

To Molley, the Demo's are not bashing the "women" the Media is.
Get real!!

Tough Lady, NC   September 3rd, 2008 1:13 pm ET

Does McCain think that women are really that stupid to vote for this woman. He did not do his homework and he is blaming the media. I say treat her as if she were a man as the VP choice. Don't be easy on her because she is a woman. If we want equal treatment we need to take the good with the bad. That's what I did as a Police Officer for 25 years.

Steve   September 3rd, 2008 1:13 pm ET

Liberals in sate of panic! Violently thrashing about given the prospect of a strong woman candidate who will resonate with real people...not the elitest liberals.

Watch the speech tonight and wet your pants for a second time. :-)

Gail   September 3rd, 2008 1:13 pm ET

This is just laughable. It isn't going away Schmidt. Get ready!!!

The BOTTOM Line......   September 3rd, 2008 1:13 pm ET

UHHHHHHH, HOW CAN U MAD @ THE FACTS....U CAN DENY A LIE, BUT U CANT DENY THE TRUTH!

Henri De Roule   September 3rd, 2008 1:13 pm ET

I think the questions of "experience" for both Obama and Palin are appropriate. However I think it is more important for Palin because she is second in line behind an older person and therefore a better chance of attaining the presidency through the death of the President than does Biden. That is the real problem.

Donna   September 3rd, 2008 1:13 pm ET

the choice of sarah palin reminds me all over again about the choice they made to go to war. They really did not think the decision through and it ended up being a big mistake. John Mcain screwed his self when he made a rash decision and did not vet her. Of course there was going to be interest and people were going to check her out! I do not agree with the arguments about her kid but everything else is fair game.

WE NEED LEADERS WHO CAN MAKE WISE DECISIONS NOT ROLL THE DICE AND LEAVE THE FATE OUR COUNTRY UP TO A GAMBLE.

THIS IS SERIOUS THIS IS NOT A GAME!!!

JJ   September 3rd, 2008 1:13 pm ET

Shame on McCain for choosing an easy target for the Left and the Media. And shame on Palin for throwing her families short comings into the spotlight.

Jon Do   September 3rd, 2008 1:13 pm ET

So when will the MSM start investigating the children of the Biden/Obama ticket?
What medical tests shall we ask for of Obama's daughters?
Oh wait, I almost forgot – the media is already in the tank for Obama.

Pat   September 3rd, 2008 1:12 pm ET

While everyone is debating the Palin issue, no one is paying any attention to Ron Paul. Did anyone notice he had more people at his party last night than the GOP had? It's quite obvious that the GOP is not united behind McCain as they would like us to believe. How many senators were a noshow last night?

a, holley   September 3rd, 2008 1:12 pm ET

McBush/Palin better back off Obama, Any Idiot that vote withouts facts for Palin is crazy.

K. in Houston   September 3rd, 2008 1:12 pm ET

There is absolutely nothing wrong with Sarah Palin. She is exactly what the country needs....John McCain did the right thing by choosing her in my opinion. I have no idea what "power" this Obama character holds over the media, but it is all going to backfire on himself & the
Dems come November.

The Iraq war IS legal   September 3rd, 2008 1:12 pm ET

They can't find any real issues, so they are focusing on these stupid, over blown stories. Look at Obama's past!!

Republicans Hate America   September 3rd, 2008 1:12 pm ET

I though you right wingers said she is a tough as nails person. hmmmm. I love it when republicans cry when no one is nice to them

Jeanine G   September 3rd, 2008 1:12 pm ET

"When I hear a statement like that coming from a woman candidate with any kind of perceived whine about the excess criticism or maybe a sharper microscope put on her, I think, man, that doesn't do us any good," – Sarah Palin

Want some cheese with that whine Sarah?

Nicole   September 3rd, 2008 1:12 pm ET

I find this to be very amusing. When Barack and Michelle were under attack (i.e. New Yorker cover) unfairly I didn't hear the GOP crying that they were being treated unfair. You still have conservatives blogs claiming that Obama is a Muslim when we all know that he isn't.

If they want to blame somebody for this mess than the finger should be pointed at McCain for not properly veeting her. In the age of the Internet they should have known that all this stuff would have come up especially since nobody outside Alaska knew who she was.

Anybody with common sense knows that Palin was only selected to attract upset Hillary supporters. I find this to be sexist and a insult to all woman.

So I say Thanks but No Thanks to Palin! She ain't no HRC!

Fred from San Jose   September 3rd, 2008 1:12 pm ET

My 6 year old girl recently finished as the first girl in a running race, beaten by 2 boys. When my wife tried to comfort her that she was the first girl to finish the race, my daughter was still upset. She wanted to finish as the first person, " I can run just as fast as anybody and no matter if they are boys, girls, tall, big, ugly, smart. The race was good and the boy run good. He had a lot of practice. I'm want to practice more so I will win next time!"

All your whinners out there should learn from a 6 year old. If you lost, get over it, suck it up and do better next time. Stop hiding behind excuses and face the challenges head on. My 6year old is far more mature than you lame politicians.

Mark   September 3rd, 2008 1:12 pm ET

Obama and his supporters, who are experts at wielding hate and sexism, are at it again. Very predictable. Unlike the DNC, however, the RNC is not going to put up with it. They are to be congratulated!

ED FL   September 3rd, 2008 1:12 pm ET

America can see through Mccain. He chose Palin with all her warts until after he accepts the nomination then the media or GOP will find a way for her to quit then Mccain can choose who he wanted from the beginng The weasel from Connecticut Joe Lie-berman. Remember we are dealing with the king of dirty politics the GOP>

D&D   September 3rd, 2008 1:12 pm ET

It's not about "the first female Republican vice presidential nominee", it's about "the WRONG female Republican vice presidential nominee", who by the way is still presumptive!

Silence Dogood   September 3rd, 2008 1:12 pm ET

Linda: "has a pastor who dams Jews and says "god will punish the US of A"

So this is the same as Obama then.......

And if she pretends she didn't hear the sermons like Obama, is it all OK?

J Howell   September 3rd, 2008 1:12 pm ET

I think McCain is a fraud and a whinner..... it is OK for him to bash Obama but when the tables are turned look how he cries... Sarah whats her name is not remotly qualified to run the country, let alone handle foreign policies..What a joke, what a joke.....

Mike   September 3rd, 2008 1:12 pm ET

Let's call it for what it is. she was put on the ticket to rally the GOP base. Just google her name and see that she is as far right as it gets.

John, FL   September 3rd, 2008 1:12 pm ET

Coming from Steve Schmidt, a.k.a. Karl Rove's protege.

Democrats Unite !!!   September 3rd, 2008 1:12 pm ET

Gee, see what Obama's been going through all this time?
What a bunch of hypocrites!

Obama/Biden 2008 and 2012

Natasha   September 3rd, 2008 1:11 pm ET

She was chosen because she's a woman. Period. And as a woman, I am strongly offended that McCain is trying to capitalize on gender to keep his campaign afloat. Now that is sexist.

Fritz   September 3rd, 2008 1:11 pm ET

(1) Palin's water breaks and rather than going to the hospital, she travels 12 hours via commercial jet liner, making layovers and then drives another hour to go to the hospital to deliver her baby (putting her life and her baby's life at risk)
(2) State investigations into Palin's misdeeds
(3) Palin supporting more earmarks per capita in her state than any other governor in the country
(4) Palin supporting Alaska's secession from the US by being a member of the Alaskan Independence Party
(5) Claiming the FBI ran a check on Palin when the FBI claims it did not

If these are not the scandals about Palin, then what is the REAL scandal behind Palin?

me   September 3rd, 2008 1:11 pm ET

Can't wait for this spectacle of idiocy.

A Student   September 3rd, 2008 1:11 pm ET

Palin doesn't support Hillary's values. Ladies don't vote for McCain. It's all the Same failed Bush policies you will be sorry if those jerks get in the white house!

Rick   September 3rd, 2008 1:11 pm ET

The media needs to focus on Obama a little, I was fooled by his talk till he pick Biden to be VP, now my eyes are clear and I see Obama is all about blowing smoke and is in with the washington status quo.

Concerned Voter   September 3rd, 2008 1:11 pm ET

Why is the McCain campaign comparing palin's experience to Obama's shouldn't they be comparing it to Biden's and BO's to McCain's. From my understanding the debate will be between Biden and Palin, not Obama and Biden. Please someone help me understand!

America for Obama   September 3rd, 2008 1:11 pm ET

This is too much fun!!! I'd hate to be at those talking points meetings in the GOP camp every morning!!! Maybe the GOP is just trying to pull attention away from how senile McCain is, by nominating a VP candidate that is even more ignorant and just plain flat out dumber then McCain is. It looks like it's working on making McCain look even more senile that he picked a Denny's waitress to be his running mate. So basically the GOP ticket consists of an old man who isn't qualified to be the greeter at your local Wal-Mart and a Denny's waitress, is McCain trying to throw the election and that's why the GOP is angry with him?

OBAMA-BIDEN 2008!!!!

Rich   September 3rd, 2008 1:11 pm ET

What a load of bull, maybe these so called "country first" repubs need some Clear eyes to drop so they can see the hits their own part used on Obama and maybe they can see that the repubs have and always will be full of it.

SUNSHINE   September 3rd, 2008 1:11 pm ET

what goes around comes around.. this was the same thing Obama had to deal with. No one is experienced enough to run a country. Noone knows the the major devastaing issues a country faces until they are breifed and they have to make the best decision... so i just wish the parties would stop bashing and talk about policies..

Xavier, Saint Louis, Missouri   September 3rd, 2008 1:11 pm ET

Please, stop crying about the media asking questions about Palin. The fact of the matter is McCain want us to trust his judgment in Palin who is a nobody with absolutely no foreign policy experience and was mayor of 8000 people, now she is in a position to be president and they want us to trust them. . . . . . I think not!

STOP THE DRAMA, VOTE OBAMA!

OBAMA/BIDEN '08

YES WE CAN!

Lulz   September 3rd, 2008 1:11 pm ET

she about as competent as a drunken chipmunk. besides i always heard them say the liberals ran the media. so now its the other guys? they cant even keep their scapegoats straight. both republicans AND democrats are killing this nation.

Will, NJ   September 3rd, 2008 1:10 pm ET

So the media got Bristol Palin pregnant?

janine   September 3rd, 2008 1:10 pm ET

John McCain is the oldest presidential candidate in US history. There is a very real possibility that this woman will be sitting in the Oval Office as our President and we do not have a right to ask questions about her background????!!

DOES THIS MAKE SENSE TO ANYONE????
Will SOMEONE please call McCain's bluff ? This is a sign of things that could follow. If John McCain is president you can be sure that the media will be under a strict gag order – no criticism allowed

donna   September 3rd, 2008 1:10 pm ET

You have got to be kidding me!!!! Every chance the republicans get they are crucifying Obama and when the roast is on the other grill – all of a sudden it's not fair. When reporters ask Republicans question about Palin, they can never answer it directly – always have to refer something back to Obama. The media needs to make the Republicans answer the question.

beth   September 3rd, 2008 1:10 pm ET

Hey...Clinton already tried this tactic. What do the Republicans think...they can throw out a candidate no one has ever heard of before and we are supposed to blindly vote for her?

Ron from Baltimore   September 3rd, 2008 1:10 pm ET

McCain didn't do his homework, his staff knows it, the Republican party knows it, and has left it to the media to carry out the critical oversight task of vetting the VP candidate, Gov. Palin.

Now get off their case. Either you knew all about her various sermons and speeches, her random support for Alaskan secession, her business dealings, her stands on "earmarks" some months ago vs now, etc., etc., and expect your supporters to swallow this whole, or you did not know the second and third tier facts because you shot from the hip. I think you shot from the hip, from the gut, just like you used to do in college, in the air service to the Navy; I doubt you'll have any more allegiance than you did to your first wife.

Media, please, let us know what else you find out, and don't cower to these folks who put together those stink-filled ads.

Be thankful   September 3rd, 2008 1:10 pm ET

If it wasn't for these old white male republicans, you would all be blogging in German, Japanese or Russian.

People make no sense   September 3rd, 2008 1:10 pm ET

What the Obama camp should do tonight is have Hillary speak and bash Palin on her policies? If they really were mean they let these two women get in a fight over issues, but Obama is a gentleman. He didn't attack old druggy Cindy – even while they attacked Michelle.

He didn't attack Hillary with all her issues.

doug, TAMPA   September 3rd, 2008 1:10 pm ET

i say that since your going to bring into the front lines about her husbands dui then we should be talking about obama's DRUG use! the media doesn't care about fair and balanced new's if its news then thats all that count's. so i agree the media has falling to the waist side. i dont know what happened or when it happened but it did happen.

grampa mac   September 3rd, 2008 1:10 pm ET

Hypocrisy again and again from the Republicans

The real scandal is Palin as their pick for VP. Had they fully vetted her, they would have known this was coming.

The Republicans will use the media to bash their opponent, but when their own candidate is taking heat, they cry foul.

Pathetic.

rodlang   September 3rd, 2008 1:10 pm ET

Neither Palin nor Obama have any foreign policy experience. Neither has been in elected office long enough to have a real track record. She does have some executive experience. They actually have alot in common. Young, energetic, photogenic...not much experience.

Jaison Biagini   September 3rd, 2008 1:10 pm ET

i'll be watching the giants and redskins tomorrow.i hope it goes into overtime!! lots of whistles and penalties too!!

not that i'd watch mccain anyway!!
how many people will be at bars watching games then sportscenter??

as for media this is what you get when you pick an unknown.

Chris from WI   September 3rd, 2008 1:10 pm ET

Oh a bloo bloo bloo bloo, this coming from the "Obama's a secret Muslim (okay maybe not but do you REALLY know?!)" camp.

Face it, if you (1) support abstinence-only sex ed, and (2) cut funding for programs to support teenage mothers, then your teen daughter gets pregnant, it's going to get press because (3) you are a bad mother and (4) a bad person.

A bloooo

a woman with a brain   September 3rd, 2008 1:10 pm ET

PLEASE spare me... a bunch of men playing the "you're picking on her because she's a woman" card. She is being put thoroughly put through the same wringer we put ALL our politicians through and THAT'S A GOOD THING! Equal treatment for women (whether that treatment is good or bad) is progress, not sexism.

To NOT look into her background and scrutinize her record would be shameful. She's asking to be VP of the United States...we deserve to know everything possible about her. And the McCain campaign has no right to suggest otherwise.

G Tippit   September 3rd, 2008 1:10 pm ET

OMG. McCain and Palin just dragged her poor daughter and hockey player boy into the limelight AGAIN. What pathetic people these two are! Now they are parading her daughter in cute maternity wear holding the hand of hockey boy as they all gather to get on McCain's bus. What a STUPID move. We could try to respect the painful situation this family finds itself in and leave them to deal with their personal issues, but NO, they've got to drag these children, CHILDREN, back in front of the cameras. What boneheads.

Chris   September 3rd, 2008 1:10 pm ET

If she was a liberal women; she'd be the greatest VP choice ever and a new Susan B Anthony for rasing 5 kids and one who has down syn. Since she is GOP she is a neglecting horrible mother who should be home taking care of her kids. Womens rights only apply to liberal women. Isn't that what all these great media outlets like the NY Times, CNN, NBC esp the Today show. They should all display Obama 08 stickers in the backround. We all know it. He is the second coming.

dani   September 3rd, 2008 1:10 pm ET

Well, we're used to the media bashing the candidates. That's fair. What CNN has done is beyond the pale, questioning a woman's ability to lead BECAUSE SHEIS A MOTHER and dragging her family into the spotlight. As Obama pointed out, this is not acceptable journalism.

Bash her on her policies all you want. Dig up dirt having to do with her decisions in office. That's what journalists are supposed to do.

But CNN had a picture of Trig and Bristol Palin front and center yesterday on their home page. John Roberts asked if Palin could be a VP with 5 kids (as if she wasn't married). Senator Joe Biden raised his kids after his wife DIED- was he a bad father? No. He was heroic.Campbell Brown thinks the kids are fair game. But we're not going to mention all that in this article, are we, CNN?

You are sexist beyond belief. But let's see if this comment makes it past your moderators.

Abby   September 3rd, 2008 1:10 pm ET

what are you hiding, Sentor McCain?

Rudy NYC   September 3rd, 2008 1:09 pm ET

I guess the only "fair and balanced" media are the conservative talk show hosts.

jnsessex Fresno   September 3rd, 2008 1:09 pm ET

I am currently a registered REPUBLICAN in the County of Fresno. A few moments ago, I got off the phone with a local democratic party organizer. I asked him if the signs for "REPUBLICANS FOR OBAMA" signs were out yet. MY VOTE counts! So does my opinion. I will share MY OPINION at the ballot box this November.

velmeezee   September 3rd, 2008 1:09 pm ET

Well wait a minute, dems did not put Sarah Palin in the spotlight. She did this to herself. All her experience should have told her that she would be subjecting herself and her family to public scrutiny, which has not been pleasant for ANY presidential family in history. No one was ever trying to destroy her, we are trying to find out about her and we can't help if what there is to find is just not flattering to her and her family. And why is it so bad to "destroy" her and it was ok for republicans to "destroy" Obama and Clinton?

a, holley   September 3rd, 2008 1:09 pm ET

Thank God some of these idiots comments are not on a jury or the supreme court. McBush is an idiot and Palin did not know what a VP actually does in the White House.

We will see who will win in November.

Obama/Biden 08

Jeb   September 3rd, 2008 1:09 pm ET

Nobody is out to destroy Palin.
She destroyed herself my accepting the nomination with so much baggage.

Obama clearly have the advantage of experience, judgment and foresight.

DKR   September 3rd, 2008 1:09 pm ET

Regupgs are scared and should be!

Obama 08

Greg jacobs   September 3rd, 2008 1:09 pm ET

When i dire problems blame the media.When bush was discovered to have puffed up the reasons for war...IT"S THE MEDIA. When the economy goes south.ITS THE MEDIA. When you go to war against a country that had nothing to do with 9/11 IT"S THE MEDIA. When questioned about whom released the name of a CIA agent. IT's THE MEDIA. When the government failed at Katrina ...remember. IT WAS THE MEDIA. Harriet Meyers nomination IT"S THE MEDIA.

FOR PEOPLE WHO TAKE NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR ACTIONS.
IT"'S ALWAYS THE MEDIA.

Republican making a run for it!!!   September 3rd, 2008 1:09 pm ET

She hates the Jews and wants to break Alaska away from the United States and doesn't want sex ed in schools but is pro life, and we want her in the White House for what? Who vetted this proud pick. This is garbage, I was not going to vote but now I have to vote, I just have to let my voice be heard dispite my disappointment in my republican party.They got it right when they said put country first and that is why I am voting for Barack Obama!

Jim   September 3rd, 2008 1:09 pm ET

If she can't stand the heat, let her stay out of the kitchen, to quote a great Democrat.

Anonymous   September 3rd, 2008 1:09 pm ET

Nobody is out to destroy Palin.
She destroyed herself my accepting the nomination with so much baggage.

Obama clearly have the advantage of experience, judgment and foresight.

mj   September 3rd, 2008 1:09 pm ET

As a woman I find her interesting and likable but certainly not someone I would want as a VP or Pres. Her religious right background is downright scary. McCain made a very poor choice and although I always liked McCain, I would never vote for him with her on the ticket–just a heartbeat from being president. His choice of her as a running mate was irresponsible.

Brandon in MN   September 3rd, 2008 1:09 pm ET

Being governor of Alaska makes you qualified to be VP like managing my household budget makes me qualified to head the Federal Reserve.

Come on people, this lady has NO experience in actually making a decision. How about that National Guard leadership, what was it she did there again? Oh yeah, take orders from the Feds.

Face it, she has no diplomatic experience, no foreign policy experience, no terrorism experience, no health care experience, no education experience, and no war experience.

In contrast, Obama has at least written, sponsored and voted for / against each of those items. He is at the very least experienced in understanding the issued. Palin understand teen pregnancy and moose hunting. That's it.

randy from canada   September 3rd, 2008 1:09 pm ET

So the republican's say that Palin's family life is private, and off limits, yet they bring the Palin family together for a photo op.

Which is it? Is the family off limits, or is the family a political tool?

peace...

TM, SO. CALIFORNIA   September 3rd, 2008 1:09 pm ET

The media has given and continues to give Obama a free ride. When Edwards decided to continue to keep his hat in the race despite have small children and a wife with a terminal condition no one especially the media questioned his decision. Sexism prevails.

tom   September 3rd, 2008 1:09 pm ET

Obama is toast ... time to accept the consequences of not choosing Hillary !!! The Dems will have to wait another 4 years and try again.

KEATING 5/TROOPERGATE '08   September 3rd, 2008 1:08 pm ET

If McCrypt cannot stand the heat, he needs to get out of the kitchen(s)!

kay   September 3rd, 2008 1:08 pm ET

Don't fall for this crap this hatchet men are giving you.

No media channel is question this lady other than we need to know who is going to lead us in case McCain win and something suddeningly happens to him

Americans has been fooled by these republicans before... This is a legitimate question. We are not buying thr reform crap.

a dem   September 3rd, 2008 1:08 pm ET

As a woman, I'm insulted Palin is representing our gender. What was McCain thinking? Oh, right, he wasn't.

Also, if Obama had a 17 yr old pregnant daughter, the Republicans would have been all over it.

YakRob   September 3rd, 2008 1:08 pm ET

If Sarah Palin is the person that is being presented to us by the Republicans, great. If not, they have only themselves to blame for selecting her as their VP nominee. Senator Obama has been through two years of disgusting and unsupported attacks by the Media and I never heard one republican leader voice their disgust at the process. Why is this type of reporting a problem now?

Kate, Atlanta   September 3rd, 2008 1:08 pm ET

What? McSame thought he could pick a total unknown and no one would ask questions? What a tired, old, out of touch man he truly is.

No Way, No How, No McCain!!!!

Jeff Brown   September 3rd, 2008 1:08 pm ET

If you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen!

HillaryIn2012   September 3rd, 2008 1:08 pm ET

Typical BS... Attack the woman who has done more than the man. Attack her family? Oh yes, that is a tactic of desperate trash.

Obama's wife chose to stand up and speak, which makes her a fair target. Palin's family has not stood up and campaigned. This is ridiculous and shameful. If you have to stoop this low to win an election, then you should have picked the right nominee in the first place.

They are only bringing up family issues to deflect that Obama has done nothing except campaign during his alleged 'career'.

Louise Whitman   September 3rd, 2008 1:08 pm ET

Funny, more and more I'm leaning towards the Obama Biden ticket. Less scandals, more truth and serving our interest is guaranteed!

aggie   September 3rd, 2008 1:08 pm ET

I couldn't agree more...the Republicans have NO trouble dishing out smear after smear for the last 8 years. But give them a taste of their own medicine, and they cry "foul" like a bunch of whiney brats.

Its about time. We're not taking it anymore. ENOUGH!

Bruce   September 3rd, 2008 1:08 pm ET

Well going by McCains thinking about pay for women we shold be able to get away with paying Palin about 25% less than hte current VP After all McCain votes against equal pay for women.

Amber   September 3rd, 2008 1:08 pm ET

Oh yeah, has anyone noticed that McCain and Obama's voting records are almost identical. 4 more years of who???

Morningstar   September 3rd, 2008 1:08 pm ET

Faux? I don't think that the media has lied. Please tell me McOld what is "vrai"? McCain is the Faux president

Lyle   September 3rd, 2008 1:07 pm ET

The media did everything that could be done to destroy Hillary Clinton and now, with her out of the picture, they have set their sights on Governor Palin. What we see is a media that will stop at nothing to push their candidate of choice, Mr. Obama. Mrs. Palin is simply viewed as so much collateral damage in this all-out media war against John McCain.

Stephen in Red Bluff   September 3rd, 2008 1:07 pm ET

McCain is falling into his own trap. He wants to shift the focus of the election to Palin and ignore the real issues. Obama didn't bite.

Problem is, McCain didn't do his homework and now the media is doing its job. Now, McCain has to go to battle with the one group he can't afford to alienate.

Keep your focus Obama. You've taken the high road and stayed above the fray and pettiness!!

Brendose, Oceanside, CA   September 3rd, 2008 1:07 pm ET

WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Come on Republicants, Palin is from Alaska! You know, the state that is OUT OF TOUCH with the US???

You've been talking about balancing the budget, making executive decisions that Palin has done.

Give me a break. If you are basing her experience on what she did, then I guess ANY mayor from a city in California with a population larger than 500,000 people would have the experience to become the President of the United States, considering they would probably have MORE RESPONSIBILITY than ALASKA!!

Wake up America!!

Monica, Texas   September 3rd, 2008 1:07 pm ET

Why is the McCain camp hiding her and refuse to let media have an interview????? If she is so prepared what's the hold up?

Rich   September 3rd, 2008 1:07 pm ET

Does anyone wonder if it was really Bristol's free choice to have this baby? Or was it her only option in that family?

gary jennings   September 3rd, 2008 1:07 pm ET

THE MEDIA HAS TRY'D TO RUIN HRC NOW PALIN. THEY KISS O.B'S -,AND THAT IS THE TRUTH. HE WILL CRY RACE IF THEY ATTACK HIM LIKE HE HAS THROUGH THIS WHOLE RACE. YOU YOUNG MORON FIRST VOTERS NO NOTHING ABOUT YOUR COUNTRY AND ITS NEEDS. IF SO ,YOU DONT VOTE FOR GLAMOUR AND A AMERICAN IDOL. MOST OF YOU PROBABLY LIVE WITH YOUR PARENTS AND DONT NEED TO WORRY ABOUT ECONOMY ETC. THERE IS A SAYING. EVERYTHING THAT GLITTERS IS NOT ALWAYS GOLD. THINK ABOUT IT.

Henry   September 3rd, 2008 1:07 pm ET

Keep up the good work. When you get results like this you've only exposed the tip of the ice berg.

Carter   September 3rd, 2008 1:07 pm ET

Circular reasoning! Why the Republicans insist that Obama have all experience (national security, executive etc.), they believe that there is no need to have for McCain to have all epxerience. Hey Smalltown NC, you quip that Obama has no executive experience; you should not that McCain doesn't either. Your reasoning is arbitrary and capricious.

Jann from Denver   September 3rd, 2008 1:07 pm ET

The media is treating Palin the same way they treated Obama. Turn about is fair play. She put herself in the spotlight, therefore she and her family are fair game.

The Republicans are whiners who have no business putting our safety at risk by choosing this inexperienced, unqualified, untraveled, unworldy, right wing seperatist as McCains running mate. This is an insult; a shame and a joke.

Palin needs to be destroyed before she gets in a postion to destroy this country.

Chris, CT   September 3rd, 2008 1:07 pm ET

This is hilarious. First they complain b/c Obama is getting all the attention. Now they are complaining b/c he needs to face more scrutiny. Which is it? You can't pick up your blocks and go home when things don't go your way.

km   September 3rd, 2008 1:07 pm ET

And now Schmidt is claiming that reporters are demanding a paternity test. Let Mr. Schmidt name those reporters.

Franky   September 3rd, 2008 1:07 pm ET

Ha!!!! Look at that!! Day 3(or 2, pending you see it) and can't handle it. Like I said, you think it was gonna be easy??? I swear, you are living in 1858....

rhoward   September 3rd, 2008 1:07 pm ET

The media needs to leave Ms. Palin's children out of their reporting but anything else about Ms. Palin's background should be open to scrutiny. If she and the Repubicans have nothing to hide, why should they care?

Tim   September 3rd, 2008 1:06 pm ET

Or in other words.... Curse you media for doing your job!

Kate   September 3rd, 2008 1:06 pm ET

The repugs are a bunch of whining hypocrites. Palin is no more qualified to be vp then Betty Boop.

If they wanted a woman, why didn't they pick a smart, experienced
one like Condi Rice?

Personally, I would want someone like Tom Ridge, but I guess the repugs were trying to get Hillary supporters, which, not only didn't happen, but alienated them no end.

David Orbach, New York, NY   September 3rd, 2008 1:06 pm ET

Palin doesn't need the media to destroy her. Her own actions and affiliations will take care of that.

clinton matheny   September 3rd, 2008 1:06 pm ET

Has Palin's staff veted Nancy Pelosi? In the event that McCain dies in office (38% of our younger persidents have) Nancy Pelosi will become the VP for President Sarah Palin. Maybe Nancy will help Sarah babysit.Only in America!

Nick   September 3rd, 2008 1:06 pm ET

Not a very good pick on Mcains part , it looks like he didn't do his homework , I'm sure more will come out on this crack pot from Alaska , And REALLY wouldn't all American families be happy there 17 year old daughter to become pregnant , yes thats what we would wish for them , someones not raising her children .. Speak up Ted Stevens

ah geee   September 3rd, 2008 1:06 pm ET

The media has always been Bush's puppys McCane. Whats the mattah did they turn on you? LOL Turnabouts fair play you old geezer.

cmoore   September 3rd, 2008 1:06 pm ET

The liberals and liberal media are so scared of a real woman in power, they do not know what to do except try to destroy her. They did a good job of it on Hillary, but the American people can see right through this. In the end, this could backfire on them. Attack a 17 year old... that's sick!!!

Deb, Allentown, PA   September 3rd, 2008 1:06 pm ET

This is ridiculous, and the first two posters to this ticker item are delusional. Obama's been raked over the coals, the smear ads from the McCain camp have been played for free by the media, and yet now the Republicans are crying foul because people are RIGHTFULLY questioning the qualifications of this right-wing nutjob Governor??

Greg   September 3rd, 2008 1:06 pm ET

The dems practiced on Hillary and now thy're after Sarah. Who would have thought that the progressive party would be so backward.

KH   September 3rd, 2008 1:06 pm ET

If this wasn't so serious I would laugh. This is such HYPOCRISY!!

They cry foul anytime someone questions them and their judgment. Question them about policy – McCain retorts "I was a POW" question Palin on experience – "You are being sexist!"

Are you telling me that it is not a legitimate question to ask if the potential VP was thoroughly vetted and is indeed the right candidate for the job? Do they think women will just blindly vote for a ticket because a woman is on it? What an insult to the intelligence of women.

Bobby from MS   September 3rd, 2008 1:06 pm ET

Hey CT, bite me! You liberal scumbbags were all on your high horse when all of a sudden the McCain campain put you in your place!

Obama chose not to put a woman on his ticket. That was his mistake! Sara Palin has had to put up with more media garbage in 5 days than Obama has in 19 months!

Palin will put the final nail in liberals coffins come November!

McCain/Palin 08 !!!!!!!

Palin is a hypocrite.   September 3rd, 2008 1:06 pm ET

Me thinks you protest too much, McCain.

If she were clean at all, you wouldn't be so outraged that people are looking a little more deeply into the past of a woman no one had heard of until last week.

And don't even think you can claim that she was fully and thoroughly vetted when you only met her once before asking her to join your ticket.

And lastly, stop trying to make this about her being a woman – the media would be doing the same to an unknown, small-town mayor, wet-behind the ears governor who is under investigation for abuse of power, has close ties to Stevens, has been out of the country only once, and was (and may still be) a part of the AIP, which wants Alaska to secede from the nation. It has nothing to do with her being a woman...you're the only one who views her based on her uterus, John.

Alan   September 3rd, 2008 1:06 pm ET

The Republicans are such critics. I think it is ridiculous that we can't have an opinion against Sarah Palin without being labeled as a sexist. It's not like Obama called everyone racist when the media ridiculously scrutinized him. It's amazing that the Republicans only cry foul when it affects their candidate. Seriously, you Republicans need to grow up. She is running for Vice President. Of course she is going to get scrutinized. So as far as I am concerned the media is doing their job and I say let them keep doing it. The only reason Republicans don't want her scrutinized is because they know that she is hiding something and the media is going to uncover it.

Obama/Biden 08

Amber   September 3rd, 2008 1:05 pm ET

The media is doing exactly what it did to Hillary during the race for the democratic ticket. Obama is treated like the messiah in the media. Most of today's news is all opinion and that is guiding this country in the wrong direction. If Obama used his middle finger in place of a peace sign all the idiotic news outlets would think it brilliant. So sick of it. New coverage doesn't mean anything anymore. Obama- Great cover letter, lousy resume!

Ceee   September 3rd, 2008 1:05 pm ET

The Republicans love to portray themselves as victims of media bias. They ignore right wing talk radio and Fox News which support them disproportionately. Oh, the big bad press is asking questions. Obama handled that spotlight for over a year. And the press focused a lots of personal issues with him. I would think Palin should be strong enough to do the same for 66 days. If not, perhaps she doesn't belong in the big leagues.

joe   September 3rd, 2008 1:05 pm ET

these repulsive ,disgusting, slimy, scumbag republican it was ok to slam Michelle Obama, but its not ok to say some negative about this moose looking woman palin

don   September 3rd, 2008 1:05 pm ET

If this was Obama or Biden the McBush campaign would be all over them. So now the shoe is on the other foot and they whine.

max   September 3rd, 2008 1:05 pm ET

I think she's doing a fine job by herself of destroying this campaign ...
BTW, what does being a hot-headed, ex-POW many years ago have to do with knowing anything about the economy? If a 17 year old black girl gets preggers in the inner city, the GOP calls it a moral failure and blame the parents of the girl ... now, you expect us to believe that an unplanned, teen pregnancy is somehow a blessing and gift from God?? Now, they drag the father into a photo-op after they chastise the dems for bringing up the family ??? What a bunch of monumental hypocrits !!!

mccain is an idiot   September 3rd, 2008 1:05 pm ET

I also find it quite funny that they will have no further comment on this situation. Typical Republican response. Just stop talking about it and it will go away. McCain supposedly knew all of this information before she was chosen (though I doubt that) so why are they so upset that it's being brought up now?

And it's mostly WOMEN that say Sarah Palin wouldn't be able to handle the duties of VP with five kids (one of whom is still a baby) so quit playing the sexism card. They aren't asking Obama that because his children are older and he doesn't have a baby with special needs.

PALIN=G.W. with a Y-Chromosome   September 3rd, 2008 1:05 pm ET

Palin will set Women back 70 years!

She does not even believe in SCIENCE!

Anti-Book
Anti-Public Education
CREATIONIST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hunts animals from a helicopter....

Wanted to secede from th U.S.

She's a Neo-Con Nut Job in a skirt.

Not another 4 years, Ohio   September 3rd, 2008 1:05 pm ET

I say stop covering McSame at all

Brian   September 3rd, 2008 1:05 pm ET

Thats because the McCain campaign decided for mostly thre wrong reasons to bring in an unknown into the national spotlight that has a lot of personal and professional problems. The more I think about it the more I'm convinced they only brought her in because of her gender and not much more. And the media, for better or worse, eat this stuff up. If McCain campaign truly vetted her properly they should've seen this media response coming a mile away. Right?

eric   September 3rd, 2008 1:05 pm ET

this is more scare tactics from the GOP trying to make people think democrats are sexist and non accepting of certain group of people. when we all know in fact, the republican party is the one that discriminate against African-Americans, Hispanics, foreigners, and homosexuals.

why do we want a man in office whose main credential deals with war? we want a stronger economy. we want peace. we want to help our planet.

democrat '08

VON BISMARK,Vienna.   September 3rd, 2008 1:05 pm ET

If this woman can't keep her own house in order...

Marc   September 3rd, 2008 1:05 pm ET

I guess that asking questions and expecting answers is just too much to handle for republicans now. There is only one clear choice now, Obama, the real leader.

bob in L.A.   September 3rd, 2008 1:05 pm ET

The media wants a story- just like they did with Hillary.
If there wasn't something there , they would not have the fodder to write about.
I think Hillary got a bad wrap, but so far, Sarah hasn't bee put through the news wringer, so she has to pay the dues like everyone else.
Stop Whining McCain campaign- you chose her!

W. Spivey Merritt Island, FL   September 3rd, 2008 1:05 pm ET

John McWhine does it again. I can attack you, but you can't pick on me. Slimeball

damon   September 3rd, 2008 1:05 pm ET

McCain's campaign needs to stop crying. They knew what to expect will they chose her to be his running mate. Barrack Obama had to face alot of bad media. He wanted to change the subject and talk about the issues but he didn't cry. The coverage should be fair and balanced. I don't see the media as being hard on McCain campaign, if anything not hard enough

Jenny   September 3rd, 2008 1:05 pm ET

I wonder if anyone knows the facts anymore?? It seems each side thinks their candidate(s) are perfect. Remember they are all politicians: the antithesis of perfect.

Terry, Butte, Mt   September 3rd, 2008 1:05 pm ET

The media and the American people have a right to vett her. Its not like anyone is calling her a Muslim or an angry woman that hates her country or any of the other idiotic attacks that the Obama's have gone through.

Dawn   September 3rd, 2008 1:05 pm ET

I haven't heard a peep from the media about Palin's RADICAL religious views, yet the media put Obama under a microscope.

This lady and her children roll around on the floor speaking in tongues while pretending god is making them do it. They believe only people in their church are saved and everyone else will be left behind. Faith healing etc. So let's have some "fair and balanced" religious coverage.

The Palin family is crazy white trash.

Roger Freeman   September 3rd, 2008 1:05 pm ET

Here is an IDEA, why doesn't the press and the American voter get off her back until we know what her ideas are on Iraq, the economy and other issues important to her role as VP. I see nothing that says Palin can't handle the microscope on her and her family.... Can the press handle it.... are we talking news or are we talking People Magazine?

We need a way to re-shape the discussion and get it back on Politics.

Lucy   September 3rd, 2008 1:05 pm ET

If she was vetted properly then why did McCain send a team to Alaska only now? This is all B.S. and he made a bad decision in choosing her.

Marge Hibbing Mn   September 3rd, 2008 1:05 pm ET

They did a number on Hillary Clinton. The good old boys club is at it again. They can't stand a strong woman I tell you. They are afraid a woman will show the men who have run this country into the ground up.

whiners   September 3rd, 2008 1:05 pm ET

If she thought HIllary was whining why is she whining now? If she can't stand the heat in the kitchen should she not get out? Of course the right wing nuts will make this into a sexist thing. Picking on a girl - Boo- hoo!

Ex GOPer   September 3rd, 2008 1:05 pm ET

Can't take the heat then get out of the kitchen. It is funny how the Old Boys Network is telling us she is not one of them! But take their word for it that she has been vetted. McCain – Not ready to lead on day one! He seems almost exactly like Bush the only difference is we are keen to the games they play now!

JD in Moraga, CA   September 3rd, 2008 1:04 pm ET

Introducing her to her own Party, much less the general public, 2 months before the general election is bad enough. Charging that every question to her ability to execute the duties of the office is "sexist" is not only nonsense, it's avoiding the issues in question. She is the one who said she needs someone to explain to her what the VP actually does – how thoroughly could the McCain campaign have vetted her if she makes such a statement? A sad, pathetic, joke.

ErikS.   September 3rd, 2008 1:04 pm ET

Wow, a DWI from TWENTY YEARS AGO! C'mon guys, don't have that much on these people or something. Heck, Obama smoked pot amongst other things and admitted it, but yet a 20 year old case is news? The media is a schill.

BJ   September 3rd, 2008 1:04 pm ET

Who is whinning about the media now. Obama had to go through quite a bit of media attention. It is just fitting that Governor Palin does the same.

grammarian   September 3rd, 2008 1:04 pm ET

"Exceptionalism" is not a word.

Shasta   September 3rd, 2008 1:04 pm ET

No, the media is up in arms about this because it is an insult to the country's intelligence. It's also an insult to the country's intelligence that even a few are buying it.

Amazing   September 3rd, 2008 1:04 pm ET

Palin is an awesome choice. What don't they research Obama's controversial connections, seems a bit more relevant to the election than does the current news gossip stations. By the way-how come none of my comments get posted?

Patrick   September 3rd, 2008 1:04 pm ET

I am deeply concerned about the pick and depend on the media to uncover these stories about her unrediness to lead. It's a horrible pick for this country. Get out your coat hangers ladies!

carolflowery   September 3rd, 2008 1:04 pm ET

ps, all the bloggers here ever do is regurgitate what they heard on cnn, day in and day out, in a way, you all would deserve to have Obama as your President, I would love personnaly to see Oprah's and Pdiddy's faces when they get their new tax bills LOLOLOLOLOL

Tim   September 3rd, 2008 1:04 pm ET

Palin's record of governing (all 22 months) also far exceeds McCain's (no experience in "governing"). Why don't you make her your nominee if "executive experience" is that important?

Shirley Utter   September 3rd, 2008 1:04 pm ET

It is terrible how you are portraying Palin. It is like you are finding everything you can trash of another person. Have you looked into Obama running mate and all his divorce junk and etc. Plus all his families personal things. Sad, sad!!!!

cheryl   September 3rd, 2008 1:04 pm ET

Republicans cry foul?!?!? I love it...those dirty dogs can't take it when their CRAP IS THROWN BACK INTO THEIR FACE!!

Enough   September 3rd, 2008 1:04 pm ET

And so it begins....the twisting of the truth.

mk   September 3rd, 2008 1:04 pm ET

The media is completely biased, especially CNN. You call yourselves the best political team but all of your team is Obama lovers. What happened to fair politics. You single handedly helped Hillary lose now you, Roland Martin, Donna Brazile, Cafferty and Campbell Brown are trying to give this election to Obama on a silver platter. What's wrong with you people, you're supposed to be journalists not advocates for one candidate. Where is the McCain support on your team?

Chris   September 3rd, 2008 1:04 pm ET

Ridiculous. Pathetic. Sad. Stupid. Hypocritical. Oh and did i mention pathetic?

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Just a few adjectives to describe McCain's campaign.

KEATING 5/TROOPERGATE '08   September 3rd, 2008 1:03 pm ET

Cindy will have to pony up big bucks to repair the "STRAIGHT TALK EXPRESS" not only have all 4 tires come off, but it just dropped the transmission!

Kim   September 3rd, 2008 1:03 pm ET

The Truth Hurts

Bruce   September 3rd, 2008 1:03 pm ET

The only thing false is the VP canidate! She does not represent my family values. Any Christian that live by the teachings of the Bible will she she is a SINNER for the way she put her personal interest to grab power before the needs of her family.

White/female/age 55/Texan   September 3rd, 2008 1:03 pm ET

You Republicans are living in LaLa Land. Yes, she will get some social conservative (ultras) women who were luke warm, but Hillary's people and Independents won't go for this newest (on our radar) member of the Flat Earth Society. I swear, how backward can you people get?

Moe   September 3rd, 2008 1:03 pm ET

I'm just curious.

HAS PALIN EVER BEEN TO LOS ANGELES, NEW YORK, CHICAGO, MIAMI, DETROIT, etc.

It doesn't sound like she has been out of Alaska much.

I think this is an honest question for someone who strives to represent Americans as VP.

McCain - Palin: TRAITORS!   September 3rd, 2008 1:03 pm ET

McCain & Palin have both betrayed America!!!!!

McCain confessed to being a War Criminal in Vietnam, and recordings of his confession were used for Vietnam Propaganda. Plus American Soldiers were tortured until they would confess and betray America like McCain did!!!

Palin has committed Treason by joining the Alaskan Independence Party and trying to confess Alaskans to secede from the Union!!!!

McCain & Palin are both Traitors!!!!

Country First????? That's the biggest load of crap ever!!!!!!!

David, Chicago, IL   September 3rd, 2008 1:03 pm ET

how many of you have a job? Too much hate, misspellings, and illiteracy to be a highly qualified critical audience...must be the trailer park crowd....do you all still have WebTV?

Texas Gal   September 3rd, 2008 1:03 pm ET

Are we suppose to trust the vetting by a team who is headed by Rove and is partially responsible for the past 8 years?!

Why would they complain about the media asking questions and the public wanting to know more if there is nothing to hide?!

McCain camp never complains when the media investigates Obama or Hilary.

I must be "SEXIST" for wanting answers to legitimate questions!

CJ   September 3rd, 2008 1:03 pm ET

Based on Palin's qualifications, most county board presidents are qualified to be VP. Could she have really been the best one?

This family business...the kids reflect the values they learn at home...don't they?

ERIC   September 3rd, 2008 1:03 pm ET

We have every right to know about how she was vetted. Shes going to be working for us Americans. We are her employer. As an employer, I would do background checks. Its a Predictable , political ploy by the Mccain campaign to get HRC votes.

Nevada Mom   September 3rd, 2008 1:03 pm ET

Yeah right.
Sorry McCain folks... the media is not trying to tear down Gov. Palin.

They are trying to scramble to answer the MANY questions that the voters have about this little known candidate.
It just turns out that there are some unfavorable things to find out!
Maybe if the McCain camp had actually vetted Palin, the country would not be in a frenzy trying to uncover who this person is!

Sean,Tx   September 3rd, 2008 1:03 pm ET

To call Republicans hypocrites is a joke. If she were a democrat you would all be calling her a hero and look how brave she is to raise a family while working. I thought democrats were the party of acceptance. Guess that only applys if you are one.

Why hasn't the media asked "The Annointed One" why he still to this day has a friendship with William Ayres? They won't because like "The Annointed One" they hate this county.

Abraham   September 3rd, 2008 1:03 pm ET

I agree with this even though i support obama.

Biden plagiarized 20+ years ago and that was part of washington business so why is her husband DUI charges over 20 years ago even a point.

can we get some objective media coverage. I want to know about the candidates not how cnn, msnbc, fox etc spin it.

Unite   September 3rd, 2008 1:03 pm ET

I sometimes if that party even believes what they themselves, are saying...

ss   September 3rd, 2008 1:03 pm ET

Praise to John McCain is VP female raise to power through the PTA; BA in Journalism. SAD SAD now we know why the US is in such a mess. Games, Games, Carl Rove, Should be in jail. Palin should be a shame of herself to came that she run in the interest of women. The Republican Party should fire McCain and put some competent people in place. Shame, If McCain can get away with this well guess what more of Bush/Chany and Rove. Same old games; same old poltics.

Question John McCain's Judgement   September 3rd, 2008 1:03 pm ET

Why am I being moderated???

The media should ask John McCain the questions and if he declines to answer, fine, but as long as one american is questioning how a 72 year old, four time cancer surviror made his VP choice the question should be answered.

If the questions that were being asked before we went to Iraq, maybe we wouldn't have gone and gotten stuck there.

Someone, please email me and explain why you moderate every single comment I make and not post them.

KC   September 3rd, 2008 1:03 pm ET

And I am voting on issues. Just think Palin thinks we are in Iraq to serve "God's will". If thats who you want in office than vote for it. I will not.

Rudy NYC   September 3rd, 2008 1:03 pm ET

Suck it up McCain. It is a fair question to ask. "Who is she, really?"

You are not the victim, but rather the American public is. Do you actually have the gall to believe that the American public would take you on your word that this unknown is ready to be America's Vice President?

Your selection of a heretofore unknown calls your judgment into question. Get angry if you want. It works both ways in the voting booth.

Sandi   September 3rd, 2008 1:02 pm ET

Trying to know and understand the positions of the nominee for the second highest position in the country, the backup to a potential 72 year old president is not a "faux" anything. It's responsible behavior and if the selection by McCain was not based on solid facts but rather political gain it tells the voting public tons about how his administration would operate. We know about all of Joe Biden's deferrments, how Obama bought his home....seems reasonable to know a bit about Palin whether she is male or female. Bringing "sexism" into the debate is a dodge....

Jim   September 3rd, 2008 1:02 pm ET

Iwonder if Palin thinks Hillary is still a whinner? Sounds like a lot of whinning coming from her already. Besides that, it is not a smear if it is true.

Hootenanny   September 3rd, 2008 1:02 pm ET

Are they serious?

Did they forget all the ads the've run thus far?

America, you deserve better.

Kim K, Michigan   September 3rd, 2008 1:02 pm ET

Why so touchy?

Answering these questions directly has to be pretty easy to do, compared to, say, sending thousands of men and women to their death, insuring that their unborn children will be destroyed.

The criticism of the criticism, as a smart capable women I am not impressed by this tact. Answer the questions.

By the way, apparently Palin's didn't watch "The Baby Borrowers." Suggest you catch this show in reruns – 17 year olds are not ready!

proud army and navy mom   September 3rd, 2008 1:02 pm ET

Ok, just becaus the reporters investigate and reports on their investigation, they are try to take down mcsenile's stupid vp choice?

If Palin was so appalling as a mother and a governor, there would be no scandal to report.

Mcbush, stop your whining, it's making my head hurt. Deal with it.

Anonymous   September 3rd, 2008 1:02 pm ET

I'm so sick of the media's love affair with Obama. If was stated that CNN was fair and unbias on there reporting... Pleeeaaase. Watched some of the DNC and RNC, you can not tell me its not bias.

Also, I heard today that Joe Biden's son is caught up in some hedge fund scandal. Where is this reporting?

Why didn't the media report about Irag'w taking over control the the Advor(sp?) providence?

What about how much oil was spilled in the Gulf due to Gustav which would counter arguments against off shore drilling?

Unbias......yeh!!!!!!!!!!

carolflowery   September 3rd, 2008 1:02 pm ET

Thanks everyone, Gov. Sarah Palin is the most googled human on earth, thanks for the interest and Im sure she will introduce herself tonight as a lady, a mother, and a governor of a state that has the richest supply of fuel in our nation. The democratic party has turned out to the true racist party and the true sexist party, funny and ironic.

K   September 3rd, 2008 1:02 pm ET

They should all be ashamed! Campbell Brown your behavior is atrocious...learn some manners!

Angela McCarthy   September 3rd, 2008 1:02 pm ET

Maybe if a more suitable candidate had been vetted and chosen they wouldnt be in this predicament. All due respect to Sarah Palin and her family, but this was by far the worst decision made, which will be hard to repair.

Ed, Santa Fe NM   September 3rd, 2008 1:02 pm ET

Typical GOP.... always someone else's FAULT.... now it'll be nasty media or screams of sexism every time anyone criticizes Palin... a MORONIC choice for VP....

Did anyone catch Levi's facebook page before it got pulled?? It says it all.

Peased OFF   September 3rd, 2008 1:02 pm ET

People. ENOUGH

THE REPUBLICANS HAVE SLIPPED BACK TO DISTRACTING AWAY FROM THE ISSUES

FOOD< JOBS

ENOUGH OF THE SPIN... FACtS Please.

carl   September 3rd, 2008 1:02 pm ET

The liberal media is at it again! Like when they said that dinosaurs were here millions of years ago....yeah, right! Try 6000 years ago. Says in the bible.

The stupid media and their "facts" derived from "research" and "study" have no place in our world. If I wanted to get information relative to the structure of the universe, all I gots to do is go to church for a while.

Plus John mccain is a war hero. Dont people get that? He chose to be captured so that america could win viet nam...and we did. Where was obama during this? Probably helping the 9/11 terrorists. Have we forgotten 9/11?

Hillary Supporter for Obama   September 3rd, 2008 1:02 pm ET

That's right, stop asking questions about Sarah Palin and her record as Mayor and Governer. She's a reformer because we said so!! That's all you need to know! No further questions, go away. LOL.

KEATING 5/TROOPERGATE '08   September 3rd, 2008 1:02 pm ET

Cindy will have to pony up big bucks to the "STRAIGHT TALK EXPRESS"

Spencer, Newport News, VA   September 3rd, 2008 1:02 pm ET

Republicans = ELITISTS

Did you notice the sea of white folks in that place last night? I think I saw one brother in there, but he looked almost 100 years old.

OBAMA/BIDEN 08

Theresa-IL   September 3rd, 2008 1:01 pm ET

Give me a break! She calls Hillary Clinton a "whiner" and now this. She is only getting the same as EVERY presidential and VP candidate has gotten. The "Republican" machine was even bringing up Michelle Obama's college thesis, and she isn't even a candidate!
Grow up!

Philadelphian trapped in Texas   September 3rd, 2008 1:01 pm ET

"Tough media scrutiny" my eye. The media hasn't even challenged the Republican lie that Palin had been vetted and her daughter's pregnancy was known and she was selected anyway. In fact the Republicans would never have picked her had they known that, and they are fuming in private that Palin never mentioned it during the vetting process. Why doesn't the tough media pick up on that one?

s katz   September 3rd, 2008 1:01 pm ET

I don't want to destroy her, I just don't want her for Vice-President.

As for her multiple legal problems in Alaska, I think the people in that State should investigate and prosecute the crimes she has committed, just as they would any common Republican .. I mean criminal.

Oh .. you y'all know Republican and criminal basically mean the same thing these days, right?

Duke Cunningham. Tom DeLay, Bob Ney, Jack Abramoff. She's just another one of those type of folks, she's just in training.

I think America has had enough with rank criminals in charge.

Let's have some law abiding citizens lead the country for a while, OK?

Rosa Birmingham, AL   September 3rd, 2008 1:01 pm ET

what a bunch of whiners. they can sure dish it out but can't take it.

susie   September 3rd, 2008 1:01 pm ET

The media is against any woman in politics. They went after Hillary, Sara, and ever her 17 year old daughter. They must all be drinking kool-aid.

James Bailey   September 3rd, 2008 1:01 pm ET

It's funny how quick the McCain/Palin fans were to jump on the "internets" and e-mail rumors about Palin's daughter, etc. Many of these same people are the ones who have been e-mailing chain letters about Obama being a Muslim terrorist for the past 12 months. It's so hypocritical it's almost amusing.

I just hope that they don't pull the plug on Palin any time soon. Keep some skeletons in the closet until October when it's too late to replace her. You know there have to be more. When you pick an unheard of governor from the farthest out there state in the nation, there's got to be plenty to learn. I'd like to know more about Trooper-gate, myself.

Goodson   September 3rd, 2008 1:01 pm ET

We want to know everything about Sarah Palin, she should come out of hiding and answer every question thrown to her, this is not time to hide under the worn cloak of sexism, it's D day of politics.

Karen   September 3rd, 2008 1:01 pm ET

I find it very interesting that McCain drags out the "liberal media" argument after the media actually does its job to check out the claims the McCain campaign is making on Gov. Palin. And after investigation, it seems the media has done a much better job at vetting her than he did.

Just because the McCain camp says something, doesn't mean it's true. It's up to a free press to find out the truth.

And, Mike from TX, the media HAS been investigating all the accusations against Obama. They are not being biased if there is nothing to find - which there isn't.

Thank you CNN, for doing the hard investigative work we need done. Kudos, especially, to Campbell Brown and working to make Tucker Bounds actually answer a question.

Obama is the greatest   September 3rd, 2008 1:01 pm ET

I love Obama, he is awesome, he is the best. He has so much experience and knows everything. I wonder if this is what it takes to get a comment posted. What country do I live in again?

mccain is an idiot   September 3rd, 2008 1:01 pm ET

How is the "scandal" a faux one? It's absolutely true that the woman fired someone because they wouldn't fire her ex-brother in law and it's also true that her 17 year old daughter had premarital sex (gasp!), is pregnant, and is being forced to keep the baby and marry the father. How is this created by the liberal media? Is it that the media is supposed to ignore all of it? Is that why it's being called an attack? Get real people. The Republicans have been doing exactly the same thing for months against Obama. Turnabout is fair play, Republicans. It's hard swallowing that pill now, isn't it?

Doug in Seattle   September 3rd, 2008 1:01 pm ET

What a bunch of cry babies!

Richard   September 3rd, 2008 1:01 pm ET

Let me get this straight. Neither the media nor anyone else has the right to question a vice presidential candidate's qualifications?

Rob   September 3rd, 2008 1:01 pm ET

To Mike, TX:

The media covered all of Obama's worts ad nauseum during the primaries. Palin is a newcomer to the NATIONAL political scene and America deserves to hear the issues surrounding her candidacy and decide for themselves.

Tennessee   September 3rd, 2008 1:01 pm ET

CNN wants to be the story; starting with Wolf! Campbell should have her creditional's pulled. While the McCain camp could have responded better to Palin's dealings with the National guard, Campell's antagonistic, belittling tone and condesention was offensive.

Rational thoughts   September 3rd, 2008 1:01 pm ET

All the hate comes from fear.

That is the simplest and most complete answer as to why this is happening.

E   September 3rd, 2008 1:01 pm ET

Hello! She is applying for the second highest position in the U.S. ! If she cant take the heat, Alaska is plenty cold enough. It' sfunny how they get mad for other bringing up and questioning her experience and yet in the same sentence attack Barrack's experience. Please. Besides, it's being reported that McCain himself didnt want to pick her but they wouldnt let him pick Joe Leiberman.

JSL   September 3rd, 2008 1:01 pm ET

The Palin selection as a running mate is;

Get Elected First, Country Second

Decision

Republican making a run for it!!!   September 3rd, 2008 1:01 pm ET

What has she done executive wise that will show us how she makes her decisions and judgments. McCain is turning out to be a whiner and he is trying to distract us with this because he can not tell us how he is planning on fixing his buddy W's mess of an economy. Message to McCain: Stop hiding behind Palin's skirt and your war mentality. Palin is NO Hillary Clinton. Hillary was ready to lead from day one and we believe that Barack Obama is even more ready to lead from day one. As a military minded person, McCain should have made a more tactical pick. There are way better qualified repubs. IS SHE REALLY READY TO LEAD THIS COUNTRY'S MULTIPLE WARS, FICKLED ECONOMY AND THE MANY COMPLEX THINGS THAT MAKE UP THE PRESIDENCY. GOD HELP US.

RealityKing   September 3rd, 2008 1:01 pm ET

The progressive media has exposed themselves as ideological driven haters. I certainly am not seeing any objective observations here..

KJ, GA   September 3rd, 2008 1:01 pm ET

I still think the repuglicans are desperate now and were desperate to pick Palin without properly vetting her. Say what you will, but he would've picked one os his good friends if he didn't feel pressured and scared he was't going to win without shakign things up.

Well I think it'll backfire, that is not a winning ticket...won't happen!

Done with Dems   September 3rd, 2008 1:00 pm ET

It amazes me how how you libs cry "hatemonger" at conservatives and Republicans. Do you even read the crap your writing before you puke it out on these blogs? Sure hope you people wipe……

…….or could it be your running just a little be scared? The real truth will come out when these candidates debate. I think your man might just fold like a beach chair when he has to think on his feet. We'll see.

In the meantime you kids in your mother's basement that haven't the inspiration to get a job but can muster up the most childish and vulger excrutiating mung on these blogs try and exercise a little maturity.

R. Squibbs   September 3rd, 2008 1:00 pm ET

Love it! McCain hastily picks a scandal-ridden VP, doesn't vet her properly, makes her personal life the core of her appeal (because her "accomplishments" are pretty much non-existent) ...... and when the media goes after her personal life (which the Republicans have put squarely into play), delve into her scandal-ridden past, and question whether or not she was fully vetted - it's the media's fault!

Well, I suppose when you've made a bad choice and can't defend it, you have to do whatever you can to try and save face. Too bad it's failing miserably.

Peter   September 3rd, 2008 1:00 pm ET

You people are pathetic. Did you even watch CNN? Campbell asked a legitimate question which they REFUSED to answer.

Q (paraphrased): Name one accomplishmnet Palin has done to qualifiy here as Vice-President?

Their answer: Barack Obama has no expereince. (conveniently never mentioning his 8 years in the state senate, the same resume as Abraham Lincoln)

Are you serious? That is not an answer to that question. You people are retarded and need to learn the definiton on hypocrisy and irony.

Obama=reality, McCain=la la land   September 3rd, 2008 1:00 pm ET

Senator Obama can't play the race card when he's criticized but Palin can use the sexist card when anyone questions her ?? As a women I am offended that she's so "delicate" that we can't ask questions about her qualifications........I guess now we know why McCain never vetted her either.
Jennifer, Chicopee MA

LYNN   September 3rd, 2008 1:00 pm ET

I agree with McCain. The left news media is beyond disgusting.

Stacey   September 3rd, 2008 1:00 pm ET

ARE YOU KIDDING ME?
You mean to tell me that they are upset that the media is examining this woman as closely as you would any man? What the heck is going through these people's minds? They can't just scream "sexism" and think that this means that women aren't held to the same standards as women! Are they saying that she is a weak little "gal" who can't handle the attention and spotlight? What does that say about her then? And them for being...SEXIST!
I have had it with the McCain campaign. The media is doing a great job, INFORMING THE PEOPLE, as is their JOB.
I didn't see all this hollering when Obama was getting blasted this past summer!!!

NO WAY NO HOW NO MCCAIN/PALIN

AWC from FL   September 3rd, 2008 1:00 pm ET

The only thing "fake" about this whole affair are McCain's motives for choosing her. He wanted Lieberman. Rove and the party wouldn't let him. So much for his maverick credentials. And as for the media coverage ... boo hoo and welcome to the 21st century 24/7 news cycle.

lisalu   September 3rd, 2008 1:00 pm ET

Face it. If this woman was NOT attractive, can you imagine these same people defending her? Or let us pretend that when Bill Clinton was running for president that his daughter Chelsea was unwed and pregnant. Do you think the moral people in the Rep party would be defending the Clintons in the same way they are defending everything that Palin brings to the table?For God's sake, she is currently in the middle of an ethics charge. I cannot fathom if this McCain/Palin ticket wins! And their "selective" justifications are sickening.

linda., bella vista, ar   September 3rd, 2008 1:00 pm ET

Gee, I hope that the Press starts helping to the public do the vetting instead of repeating talking points and getting sidelines by the Rovians.

NO SCIENCE FOR PALIN   September 3rd, 2008 1:00 pm ET

Palin doesn't even believe in Science!!!!

She says Global Warming doesn't exist!!! She says if it doesn't exist, then it isn't caused by Humans!!!

Palin is a nut that hates America, and tried to get Alaska to leave the Union!!!!

Anonymous   September 3rd, 2008 1:00 pm ET

"When I hear a statement like that coming from a woman candidate with any kind of perceived whine about the excess criticism or maybe a sharper microscope put on her, I think, man, that doesn't do us any good," Palin told Newsweek magazine in March.

Enjoying the selection of Palin   September 3rd, 2008 1:00 pm ET

Interesting, I put a positive comment up about Palin, and said I thought the media should research Obama, but it was never approved to be posted. I guess CNN is part of the dem's party as opposed to the news. Wonder if this will get posted.

Sarah   September 3rd, 2008 1:00 pm ET

Please. They are not disputing the fact that the husband was an OFFICIAL of the Alaskan Independence Party. There are accusations she was too. They deny that. The GOP registrations are no proofs. The media did not pick up that story and it should.

Reality   September 3rd, 2008 1:00 pm ET

Not to worry, the liberal biased media has now set its sights on Leiberman for doing what Obama cannot – making a stand that goes against the institution to support a presidential candidate who can do the same.

Hillary '12

georgia   September 3rd, 2008 1:00 pm ET

I suspect this is their way of garnering sympathy & or empathy for her.
The repubs are trying to play mind games with the american public again, like "it worked in 2000 & 2004 ,why not again"

Nicole In NE   September 3rd, 2008 12:59 pm ET

Yeah, it's so easy to forget McCain's wonderful ATTACK ads about Obama being a CELEBRITY and THE ONE.

Fluff ads that never stating any facts. Maybe the rebuplicans need to focus more on how they are going to fix the mess we are in. I am thinking going the same route as George Bush isn't the way, ya think?

Gary   September 3rd, 2008 12:59 pm ET

What did they expect??? The media tries to destroy them all!!! Then having all the garbage, true and false on the Internet, unfiltered doesn't help. It happened to the Clintons, it happened to Obama, Rove and Bush did it to McCain back in 2000. This is politics today. It is no wonder people do not want to be involved in the process.

Joseph   September 3rd, 2008 12:59 pm ET

The McCain camp had six month to choose someone worthy of vice president and they blew it. This campaign is a joke. First they pounce on Obama for not having enough experience and they chose someone with less than two years as governor. You can't have it both ways. This is the worse campagn I've ever witness. My friend this campaign is joke.

Michael Lasala   September 3rd, 2008 12:59 pm ET

You stupid republicans did that same thing to Sen. Obama acouple weeks ago SOUNDs LIKE A PARTY OF WHINNERS.. VOP= very old party

Jan in the 'live free or die' state   September 3rd, 2008 12:59 pm ET

How pathetic the GOP has become; I've lost all respect for them. I'm switching my party registration to the DEMS.

Chafta McCusker   September 3rd, 2008 12:59 pm ET

It is astounding to me that pursuing truth and real answers to legitimate questions is considered by the McCain campaign to be somehow out of bounds. If his campaign had done thier job and fully vetted Gov. Palin, the media wouldn't have to be doing it now. Forget Mrs. Palins lack of experience, I don't want a man with such poor judgment and obvious anger issues running our country!!!

obamaton   September 3rd, 2008 12:59 pm ET

Experience? Experience?? Obama rule number 1: no experience necessary!!!

Farright   September 3rd, 2008 12:59 pm ET

OH PLEASE!!!! the media is trying to destroy Palin by reporting on the past of someone that NO ONE in the nation knows anything about?.. THIS IS THE RACE FOR THE WHITE HOUSE!!! GROW UP! How pathetic can you get complaining that this coverage just isn't fair? If she tried to ban books... I want to know want to know about that. If she fires people from public service just because they voted against her... I want to know about that. If she brings down an edict that no one talks to the media without her authorization, I want to know about that.

Interesting   September 3rd, 2008 12:59 pm ET

I am an American citizen and I want to know as much about her as possible in the short time we have. I'm not interested in hearing about her teenage daughter having a child out of wedlock or her husband's DWI and questions about motherhood, but the rest is open game.

They turned Obama inside out and she should be placed under the same scrutiny. She wants to be treated equal, right? If there's nothing to hide the Republicans can relax . They had to make up stuff about Michelle Obama and Palin is turning out to be the gift that keeps on giving for the Dems so far. I saw the national polls and Obama is leading 50% and to McCains's 42%.

Obama/Biden 08

Mike from CA.   September 3rd, 2008 12:59 pm ET

Go on the attack , lie, smear, accuse, lie some more, and unfortunately the American voter has proven to be too stupid to resist.

nikki   September 3rd, 2008 12:59 pm ET

If she is all what the GOP says, why bother to try and fix it. If you hit a dog, it will scream!
As the VP, she will have to have interviews and more...why have she not had any? Is she afraid of the questions?
Now people talk about being such a good AMERICAN and this woman wanted Alaska to not be part of the USA. Where is her love for AMERICA?? I'm for Obama, but I will not defend his wrongs like the GOP is doing for Sarah. Wrong is wrong...period!

Kyle Indianapolis, Indiana   September 3rd, 2008 12:59 pm ET

They're crying because they can't take the heat.... The media is doing their job by telling the TRUTH

KC   September 3rd, 2008 12:58 pm ET

She will destroy herself.

MoreQualifiedthanPalin   September 3rd, 2008 12:58 pm ET

I'm amazed we live in a country where being a POW 30 years ago or earning a journalism degree and not even 2 years as governor of Alaska are the talking points as why we should elect a Prez and VP

Scott   September 3rd, 2008 12:58 pm ET

IF YOU CAN'T STAND THE HEAT GET OUT OF THE KITCHEN!!

WIMPS!!

Palin my VP   September 3rd, 2008 12:58 pm ET

The big scandal is yet ro come out.

Robert from CT   September 3rd, 2008 12:58 pm ET

Are you kidding! There are like 5 full blown scandal level issues here. I cannot believe McCain chose Palin as someone who has contributed to him before.

The Media needs to interview Palin. We voters deserve to get to see something other than a scripted speech that will not tell us anything but what their campaign wants us to hear.

CNN – please help our country get a real look at this unknown candidate.

TAYO, NY   September 3rd, 2008 12:58 pm ET

HEY STOP THIS HULLABALLO

A MOTHER THAT CANNOT EVEN TEACH HER 17 YEAR OLD SAFE SEX, HOW WILL SHE TEACH US ABOUT MORAL AND FAMILY VALUE?

SO MUCH FOR THE REPUBLICANS' FAMILY VALUE.

ARE WE SUPPOSE TO USE DOUBLE STANDARD JUST BECAUSE SHE IS A REPUBLICAN?

To ct   September 3rd, 2008 12:58 pm ET

To the person who mentioned there were attack ad's on Obama's wife-the difference is she is out campaigning for him and had made anti-patriotic remarks.

Britt Hume   September 3rd, 2008 12:58 pm ET

People with nothing to hide don't seek to stifle inquiry.

Not This Time!   September 3rd, 2008 12:58 pm ET

Come on, McCain! We know you got bamboozled into this! We see the puppets pulling the purse strings to keep the Repubs in power by energizing the religious right!

Do the right thing for your country and shut down this the charade or at least muff the debates!

k in Texas   September 3rd, 2008 12:57 pm ET

The Republicans need to stop being so hypocritical! As an American citizen, I have the right to KNOW who it is that I am potentially voting for.

If Obama cancelled an interview because an aide recieved "tough questions" about Biden, the McCainanites would be ALL OVER IT!

Concerned Citizen Homestead, FL   September 3rd, 2008 12:57 pm ET

If the Republicans cant stand the heat they should get out of the kitchen.

Pat   September 3rd, 2008 12:57 pm ET

***Long Live The Freedom of the Press***

Jay from New Jersey   September 3rd, 2008 12:57 pm ET

Why hasn't there been ANY media scrutiny of Obama's marijuana and cocaine abuse? Oh yea, he's a democrat.

Florida Voter   September 3rd, 2008 12:57 pm ET

Hear we go again! The McCain camp are whining like a bunch of babies when they are put to the test. You didn't hear the Obama camp cry when the MSM pounced on him for MONTHS and MONTHS during the primary...and now 5 days of valid questioning after McCain picks his VP and the tears come out?!!! GIVE ME A BREAK!!!

If Palin can't handle a little vetting from the MSM, how can we expect for her to lead this country?

Save The Polar Bears!   September 3rd, 2008 12:57 pm ET

SAVE THE POLAR BEARS!

SAVE THE POLAR BEARS!

SAVE THE POLAR BEARS!

SAVE THE POLAR BEARS!

Sarah Palin didn't want them listed as an Endangered Species, and she even tried to Sue the U.S. Government for wanting to list Polar Bears as Endangered Species!

Sarah Palin says the U.S. should stop trying to make laws in Alaska!

Sarah Palin is a member of the Alaskan Independence Movement, that wants to secede from the Union and become it's own Country, because she hates America!!!!

John, Catholic   September 3rd, 2008 12:57 pm ET

It is truly beautiful. The McCain campaign has taken the principal of non-violence and applied it to help get McCain elected.

Mrs. Palin is so out of her league that any attack against her will appear excessive and will make the attacker look bad thus garnering sympathy for her. As the principal of non-violence depends on the violence of the oppressor so that it may be compared to the lack of violence by the oppressed.

To quote Carl Von Clausewitz: "It is the defender not the attacker that seeks war death and destruction. For the attacker would love nothing more than to conquer peacefully and unimpeded by any defense. Thus the defender seeks to dissuade their attacker by causing suffering to the attacker as well as gain support from other by gaining sympathy from the bloodshed,"

Mark   September 3rd, 2008 12:57 pm ET

I don't recall anyone coming to Hillary's defense when the media basically ignored her...to the promote Obama. Why would anyone expect the media to treat Palin any differently.

scott in NC   September 3rd, 2008 12:57 pm ET

So I guess the media should just stop doing it's job. Of course we should all just accept, without question, the fact that McCain chose someone that 99.9% of the people outside of Alaska have never heard of. I mean, why do we need to know anything about any politician?

Rob   September 3rd, 2008 12:57 pm ET

If Obama had chosen a running mate identical in life and political experience, the GOP and Rove's disciples would be all over her. I say quit whining. McCain made a risky choice, now deal with it.

Maria, Byron Center, MI   September 3rd, 2008 12:57 pm ET

It has nothing to do with gender, but whether she's ready to be commander in chief if something ever happens to a 71 years old president with the most stressful job in the world.

How hypocrite from the republicans to be saying that Obama doesn't have experience again and again, and then McCain chooses Palin? and they even say she has more experience than Obama???

WHAT A JOKE???

One thing we cannot hide if the fact that McCain has a very bad judgment.

Toni   September 3rd, 2008 12:57 pm ET

I agree with the poster above

As long as you are not accusing the other campaign of doing it, I could care less

Although i personally dont blame the media for a thing

Cuz if the shoe was on the other fit , the media would have an even greater field day with all of this

She is a scandal all in herself, not the media

DW   September 3rd, 2008 12:57 pm ET

Well if this is John McCain being thorough..I'd hate to see him in a hurry! MET HER ONCE..INTERVIEWED HER FOR THE FIRST TIME THE DAY BEFORE SHE WAS SELECTED. This is thorough? Well, we know now exactly what kind of government we'd have with McCain at the helm..shoot from the hip..make decisions and ask questions later..no attention to detail..risk taker...do we want this guy in the White House? I'm amazed he has been able to keep his day job as a senator with this sort of incompetence.

Patty, Big Bear, CA   September 3rd, 2008 12:57 pm ET

Try reality.....the Evangelicals should have picked a better partner for McCain.....they may be able to overlook her flaws but the general public cannot....if she was indeed qualified to be VP that would be one thing, but since she is qualified to be a pretty face only that's another....you can bet that she was handpicked and put in place in Alaska as well to serve the interests of the right...she's as much a front as bush is

scott   September 3rd, 2008 12:57 pm ET

"The McCain campaign will have no further comment about our long and thorough process. This nonsense is over. ."

Translation: "We don't have any good answers to your questions and the ones we do have either dodge the question entirely or make us look like complete idiots so please stop"

Tom   September 3rd, 2008 12:57 pm ET

What a pile of BS. McCain chose by the seat of his pants and now he wants a free ride. As if Republicans are all about what's good for women anyway. I think not! They are huffing and puffing because they know they are in a jam. Most Democrats, independents, and women in both groups see right through this transparent attempt by McCain to grab a few extra votes. Obama has proven he is presidential material. McCain has proven he is not.

Arin   September 3rd, 2008 12:57 pm ET

Karma bites you in a the butt when you least expect it.
That being said, i wish the media would start to address Palin's extremist views including teaching Creationism instead of Evolution in schools, her comments to her church that the "Iraq war plan is God's plan", her intent on banning books in the Wasilla Public Library. These are things the press should start to after.

He did WHAT!!   September 3rd, 2008 12:57 pm ET

I am sooo sick already of the GOPbots blaming every question directed toward Palin on "sexism". Obama was accused of every insulting and untrue thing in the world from being a muslim to plotting bombings on Washington when he was 8. He suffered through Fox calling his wife his Baby's Momma, someone making a monkey puppet of him and selling it on the net, etc...and he NEVER claimed racism. He went about his very dignified way spreading his message of change, hope and unity. So Sen. McCain: If Sarah can't play with the big boys then make her go home!! If you can't take the heat of us questioning her qualifications, then you need to make some excuse, dump her and choose someone else!! If you keep supporting her then you need to take a Xanex or 2 and get ready for all the questions you neglected to ask and more because it has nothing to do with her GENDER but everything to do with her COMPETENCY...and yours!!!
To CNN and the rest of the media: GO FORTH AND DO YOUR JOBS!!!

ex Dem   September 3rd, 2008 12:57 pm ET

The "angry left"....that pretty much covers it.

Annoy the media, annoy the libs, vote McCain/Palin!!

S. Boatman   September 3rd, 2008 12:57 pm ET

This Woman Was Not Vetted By Mccain So Now The News Media Will Do It For Him! Dont Be Suprised At What They Uncover Along The Way! Look At All The Scandel So Far And It Has Not Been A Week Yet! There Will Be More To Come Im Sure!

She's No Maverick   September 3rd, 2008 12:57 pm ET

Before she bucks the system she's going to have to get permission from her daddy, John McCain. Give me a break, this ticket is a joke.

Glenn   September 3rd, 2008 12:56 pm ET

What a bunch of idiots! When the tables are turned the McSame Bunch crumble and resort to whinning! What hypocrisy!

zack   September 3rd, 2008 12:56 pm ET

This is an absurd attempt by McSame camp to silence any criticism of Ms. Beauty Queen. People and the media have a vested interest in getting to know this lady that would be a heartbeat away from becoming their president.

If we leave it up to you repubs, you are satisfied with her being geographically close to Russia as a foreign relations experience so we are not buying it and we WILL do our own vetting.

Chris, Antioch, CA   September 3rd, 2008 12:56 pm ET

The media does not want to destroy Sarah Palin. It's just doing it's job to help vet her for the American people. And the more we learn, the more dangerous she sounds. Maybe it is doing its job for once.

Obama / Biden 08 and 12

Happy with Palin   September 3rd, 2008 12:56 pm ET

I am a midwesterner living in Austin. I couldn't be more excited about the choice of Palin! I was very unenthused before she was selected. As far as all of the coverage over the pregnancy-are you kidding? Where are the stories and questions about Obama's controversial connections? They are relevant to the election, the pregnancy is not. I used to enjoy the news, but now that it seems it is more of a commentary and less news, I don't, I choose alternative media-wonder why so many of the traditional news outlets are financially struggling?

obama supporter   September 3rd, 2008 12:56 pm ET

a week into her candidacy and she already has this much drama around her – great just what america needs: an old man and a drama queen

Warren Houston, TX   September 3rd, 2008 12:56 pm ET

Why are we not reading about Joe Biden's daughter getting arrested last week in front of a lesbian bar? Evidently she tried to intimidate the police officer over the fact that they didn't know they were messing with Joe Biden's daughter. Sept 20th court date.

I guess CNN won't cover that.

S. Boatman   September 3rd, 2008 12:56 pm ET

This Woman Was Not Vetted By Mccain So Now The News Media Will Do It For Him! Foot Be Suprised At What They Uncover Along The Way! Look At All The Scandel So Far And It Has Not Been A Week Yet! There Will Be More To Come Im Sure!

Jeff in Illinois   September 3rd, 2008 12:56 pm ET

Of course she has more governing experience than Senator Obama. She's been a governor for almost 2 years, after serving as Mayor and City Councilwoman of a city of less than 10,000 people.

Contrast this with Senator Obama, who has 8 years of experience in the Illinois Senate, and almost 4 years of experience in the United States Senate.

Contrary to ridiculous emails floating around, Obama has well over 178 days of experience, but for the purposes of this Republican sound-byte, he has absolutely no experience as a governor. Congratulations McCain camp, you managed to pull the wool over the eyes of the least intelligent among us.

Typical White Person   September 3rd, 2008 12:56 pm ET

We seriously need seriously need a media watchdog.

I wonder what SNL will do this week???

NY4O   September 3rd, 2008 12:56 pm ET

Under federal Investigation after less than 2 yrs in POWER… Yeah this is what we need America, someone with Judgment. She and her husband break the "status quo" only if when we say "Status Quo" we're referring to the "Law"

Jim   September 3rd, 2008 12:56 pm ET

I have at least three problems with the Palin affair:

1. McCain's decision process was seriously flawed and calls into quesion his ability, stability and temperament to lead the country.

2. McCain made a crude political ploy to woo the GOP right wing and women voters, but put the country at risk of being led by a highly unqualified VP in a potential crisis.

3. Obama's intellectual depth, understanding, talent and leadership skills far exceed the McCain/Palin team. Obama made a brilliant choice for VP that all Americans can feel comfortable with.

Obama!!   September 3rd, 2008 12:56 pm ET

OH my!! Another Scandal?? Anything that benefits them eh???

Vickie, Maryland   September 3rd, 2008 12:56 pm ET

They didn't seem to care when this was happening to Michelle Obama!

Hypocrites!!!!

Down with the Republican party and their stale, outdated ways!

ST   September 3rd, 2008 12:56 pm ET

I am so intrigued with this year's election. This has to be the most exciting election year I have ever seen! There's adultery, violence, teenage pregnancy, greed. The only issue is, our candidates need to be above all of this. They are supposed to be examples for the American people. Maybe we shouldn't hold them to such a high standard, but they put themselves there.

The Republicans preach to the rest of us about morals, but look at what they have as the best examples of themselves. A man who cheated on his handicapped wife, leans towards special interests, & make horrible decisions without thinking. Then his runningmate. While she may be a strong and intelligent woman, she is also of questionable character. Her teenager is pregnant (abstinence my foot), there's an investigation, she supported the bridge to nowhere, and her husband works for one the the big oil companies that is bleeding us dry. Wow!

I can't understand why the race is so closed. People really need to think for themselves and research before they vote. Otherwise, we are so screwed.

People make no sense   September 3rd, 2008 12:56 pm ET

Give me a break. Prediction: Palin will cry tonight after talking about Hillary or her family.

Christian, Tampa FL   September 3rd, 2008 12:56 pm ET

I think it's despicable that the McCain campaign wants to hide behind Palin's gender and avoid all the very substantial questions that the public holds about this governor.

Confused in DC   September 3rd, 2008 12:56 pm ET

Isn't this the truth... Like it or not, this is a lot of hash out of hay! Even the much bally-hooed earmarks, so what do we really expect her to do as the mayor of a small town, just sit around and let all of the other towns around her get money, while her town suffers? STOP. It is ALL ABOUT where you sit and for anyone who has ever had to make a decision that affects others, you know that. The media, i.e. CNN needs to get over the fact that they weren't part of the vetting process. She was vetted to Sen McCain's satisfaction, so he will have to live with that. CNN, MSNBC, NBC, Fox, New York Times, etc... GET OVER IT! You're NOT part of the process!

Brian   September 3rd, 2008 12:56 pm ET

She's investigated heavily because she's a candidate for the vice presidency!! Just because she has skeletons in her closet doesn't mean the media is making all of this up. If the GOP didn't want this kind of negative attention, then McCain shouldn't have selected Palin as his VP!!

We're NOT "your friends"!!!   September 3rd, 2008 12:55 pm ET

O well McCain campaign, deal with it. There wouldn't be an issue if we were voting for america's hottest mommie, but were not. Months you've railed against Sen. Obama for his so called "lack of experience" but you put a woman who has NO interest or experience in forgien policy. Say he get's elected and something happens to him where he is unable to do his duty as POTUS. She steps in and they we will be BEGGING to bring Bush back.

Obama/Biden '08

Obidan08   September 3rd, 2008 12:55 pm ET

The truth is always hard to swallow. I do agree on one thing said, we should all take our complaints to the voting booth on Nov. 4. Action speaks louder than words.

Phillip   September 3rd, 2008 12:55 pm ET

Right. McCain's camp is just so gleeful and eager to start abusing that gender card now that their VP candidate happens to be a woman.

The media isn't tough on Palin because she's a woman. It's tough on her because her political career consisted of being a mayor of a small Alaskan town for a couple of years, and of being the governor of Alaska for 20 months, and on top of that, there's evidence she abused her power as governor. The media has to do its job and report the news. This is news.

Fred from San Jose   September 3rd, 2008 12:55 pm ET

Typical response from Republicans: never know when to admit error in judgement. No wonder the world hates USA because of our perceived arrogant ways.

Joe   September 3rd, 2008 12:55 pm ET

I call B.S on this. It is the media's job to unravel all there is to know about this new VP choice. After all, not very many of us know anything about her so I commend the media for taking the time to uncover what there is to know about Palin. Albeit most of it is negative but still, EVERYTHING should be laid out on the table and nothing should be kept a secret! Keep up the good work CNN and other media news outlets.

Mary   September 3rd, 2008 12:55 pm ET

Let me get this straight:

The media shouldn't question the record of the individual that may be the next vice-president?

I would have thought that after the lack of reporting done by the media after 9/11 and the buildup to the Iraq War, it would serve our country (country first!!!) to do a thorough background check on Palin, McCain, Biden or Obama.

We, as a nation are owed this regardless of what party you may belong to–I welcome any vetting (regardless of how it comes about) that may bring forth issues and concerns that all Americans should be concerned about.

The McCain campaign should not blamed the media (which McCain himself has called "his base") for asking legitimate questions of the person that is " a heart beat from the presidency".

If you have nothing to hide and in the interest of transparency, what is the problem?

Brian - Trinidad   September 3rd, 2008 12:55 pm ET

American media, this is the 21st century.Stop hiding your sexist attitudes behind phoney baloney rationale.You got away with the vicious attacks against Hillary,but 2 women in a row?You're not fooling anyone.The only reason you are against Hillary and now Sarah is because they are women.Shame on you!

Atlanta Red   September 3rd, 2008 12:55 pm ET

Palin has humans in her family! Film at 11!

I know it is hard for people to understand, but if the Republicans are capable of any of the kind of conspiracies the left wing of the Dems ascribe to them, why would they think Palin was a name picked out of a hat without careful consideration?

"Trooper-gate" – the cop tasered his step-son. If a (D) had tried to have him fired, the (D) would be a hero.

"Obama has more experience" – Sen Obama continues to deny that Palin is the governor of a state – a state that is crucial in our national energy policy. Ignoring her accomplishments is demeaning.

"Daughter's pregnancy" – News flash: even devout Christians don't do everything perfect every time, and we're not immune from consequences. Would you be less critical if she aborted the child? News flash #2: She is exercising her choice as a woman – choosing to bring the child into the world, and become whatever potential he or she holds.

Amazing that CNN talking heads can get away with propogating the mysogyny and feminists are cheering them on.

Hillary Supportor For Obama!!!!   September 3rd, 2008 12:55 pm ET

I thought about voting for McCain, but once he picked Sarah Palin that was OVER!!!!

NO WAY, NOW HOW, NO MCCAIN, NO PALIN!!!!

Chips   September 3rd, 2008 12:55 pm ET

I have heard of internet dating, but this sounds like internet pick a VP.

therealist   September 3rd, 2008 12:55 pm ET

Yes, we too see it John. Right here on CNN. The best progressively agenda driven political team in politcs...

Interesting   September 3rd, 2008 12:55 pm ET

I am an American citizen and I want to know as much about her as possible in the short time we have. I'm not interested in hearing about her teenage daughter having a child out of wedlock or her husband's DWI and questions about motherhood, but the rest is open game.

They turned Obama inside out and she should be placed under the same scrutiny. She wants to be treated equal, right? If there's nothing to hide the Republicans can relax . They had to make up stuff about Michelle Obama and Palin is turning out the be the gift that keeps on giving for the Dems so far. I saw the national polls and Obama is leading McCain 50% and to his 42%.

Obama/Biden 08

bobfromcanton   September 3rd, 2008 12:55 pm ET

wow, the story is true and it is on CNN! I am amazed...

Speider   September 3rd, 2008 12:55 pm ET

"McCain camp slams 'faux media scandal'"

...shouts, "we were about to do the same to Obama and you stole our idea!"

s   September 3rd, 2008 12:55 pm ET

What a bunch of pansie these Repubs are! Blame the media instead of toughening up. Pathetic.

Ellie in Aurora, CO   September 3rd, 2008 12:55 pm ET

Thank goodness for the grown-ups in the Obama campaign! These guys sound like a bunch of babies. Loved how they pulled the Larry King interview with CNN because they didn't like the scrutiny their new VP pick was getting on experience!

Independent in DC   September 3rd, 2008 12:55 pm ET

Spare me the spin. It's no different than 18 months ago when Obama was the new face on the block. They scrutinized everything he did or said and everything anybody he ever knew did or said. We didn't see any Republicans crying foul then now did we?

Koolaide Drinkin' Liberal   September 3rd, 2008 12:55 pm ET

But, but, but – the Down Syndrome baby is really Bristol's! I know it is! I read it on Daily Kos!

Niky   September 3rd, 2008 12:55 pm ET

Who's starting sexism talk now? Repubs, Shame on you!

I'm just saying   September 3rd, 2008 12:54 pm ET

OMG! Enough already. This is done to every candidate...why would they think that the public and media arent going to scrutinize his pick. Especially since it was somewhat of a left field pick.

Todd M   September 3rd, 2008 12:54 pm ET

Schmidty, insulting the press is sure going to work, ins't it? When you drop a surprise bomb there is going to be fallout. The press doesn't like to be surprised so they are going to dig harder now.

Haven't you ever heard the old adage about flies, vinegar and honey?

Cleo   September 3rd, 2008 12:54 pm ET

What a hoot....the republicans pick a woman and they goof it up and now they go on the defensive.....as I said what a hoot!!!!

Sarge in Florida   September 3rd, 2008 12:54 pm ET

BOO HOO HOO for Sarah...Get over it PTA mom....Shot gun wedding for the young man..Go ahead REPUBLICANS ruin someone else's life by making this YOUNG man marry her irresponsible daughter...

inuk   September 3rd, 2008 12:54 pm ET

The vitriol spewed at this woman from the lib-left is beyond comprehension. It smacks of fear, of being on the defensive. A lot of it could be called 'hate speech'. It's so over the top that BO and JB are trying to rein it in.

What could cause such a full-on nuclear attack on an 'every-day person' like Sara?

The revolting comments directed at her 17 year old daughter are even worse. It takes a cowardly dark mind, maybe even a sick mind to throw that kind of rubbish on a pregnant 17 year old girl.

What could possibly justify that?

Misogyny.

There will be ineveitable blowback from this. I have a mother, a wife, a sister and a daughter and like most Americans, would like them to be treated respectfully. A lot of us, maybe millions of us, will have this in mind when we decide who to vote for.

georgia independent   September 3rd, 2008 12:54 pm ET

Wow – pretty scary that this is what you get as a Republican after a "long and thorough search". I'd have felt a lot better if they'd said they threw darts...

Becky In Indiana   September 3rd, 2008 12:54 pm ET

Can we fire Palin like she has done to whoever disagrees with her like librarians, police, the Alaska Agricultural and Conservation Board...

Geoff Los Angeles   September 3rd, 2008 12:54 pm ET

This has nothing to due with gender! Gov. Palin is an underqualified lightweight who is not ever remotely ready to be the VP. As of July 31, 2008, she did not even know what the VP does on a day to day basis. Look it up; youtube is a powerful tool in this election.

Just imagine if Obama picked an equivelent running mate. He would have been crucified in the media. People would be calling for his head.

McCain needs to admit to the American public that he made a mistake and will rechoose shortly. After all, didn't Sarah Palin's daughter make a mistake that she admitted to and is living with?

Obama/Biden!!!

Steve   September 3rd, 2008 12:54 pm ET

So, by reporting Palin's lack of experience, problems with misuse of power, support of the infamous "bridge to nowhere" and pregnant daughter, the media is trying to destroy her? Hmmm.... would that be anything like Rove implying that Obama is a closet Muslim and socialist? Nope. Not the same at all. The comments about Palin are true. Watch for the McCain camp to cut her loose in about 2 weeks. She'll resign her nomination due to "personal reasons".

Inata   September 3rd, 2008 12:54 pm ET

McCain will be defending his pick after he is smashed in the election. Thank you for giving the incentive to actually register more voters for Obama.

Charlotte   September 3rd, 2008 12:54 pm ET

I use to think the Democrats were more progressive in there thinking. Now I see the sexist comments at their highest. It was bad enough with Hillary, but this borders on insane. A woman as VP who is being attacked because her daughter is pregnant? A woman, who is being questioned about her ability to be VP and take care of her family? A woman, who has more executive experience then any of the men, is questioned about her qualifications? A woman, is a heartbeat away from the Presidency and as such the Democrat have McCain dead and buried? I pose those same questions to Obama, who is the heartbeat of the democrats? Obama picked Joe Biden to lessen his 'not qualified' status. McCain is qualified and doesn't need a 30 year Senator to bolster his abilities. The DNC and Obama have turned this life long Democrat, into a Republican.

Sue   September 3rd, 2008 12:53 pm ET

Hey, if they can't take the heat, get outta the kitchen!

The Republican Thugs are the masters of destructive politics. Look what they did to John Kerry.

Toni - Atlanta   September 3rd, 2008 12:53 pm ET

Note to the media: I leave it up to you to continue to do your job, especially since the Republican candidates feel they can just shut themselves off from responding otherwise!

Elizabeth   September 3rd, 2008 12:53 pm ET

THE MEDIA DID NOTHING WRONG HER.NO ONE IS ALLOWED TO ASK HER QUESTIONS OR PRINT THE TRUTH ABOUT HER?!
EVERY CANDIDATE IS TREATED THIS WAY.THE AMERICAN PEOPLE HAVE A RIGHT TO KNOW.YOU CAN'T JUST SHOVE HER DOWN OUR THROATS!THIS IS NOT A COMMUNIST COUNTRY.

ALSO-THE REPUBLICAN PARTY IS MOSTLY ALL WHITE.WHY IS THAT.THAT IS NOT THE REAL AMERICA.THAT IS NOT DIVERSITY.I DON'T AGREE WITH ALL DEM'S DO BUT AT LEAST THEY ARE VERY DIVERSE.THIS IS SCARY.VERY SCARY WHAT THE REPUB'S ARE TRYING TO.DON'T LET THEM GET AWAY WITH TRYING TO SNEAK HER IN UNDER THE RADAR.

mama4obama   September 3rd, 2008 12:53 pm ET

I disagree. I feel that Palin is getting exactly what Obama has gotten for the past 18 months. Although I do not rely on the media for accurate information, it is a source for discussion nonetheless.

If you are going to play with the big dogs....

Justin   September 3rd, 2008 12:53 pm ET

WHAAAA!!! So the Repubs can't handle a little hardball. They can dish it out but they can't take it. Wake up Gov, you just went from the minor leagues straight to the world series....welcome.

Get Real   September 3rd, 2008 12:53 pm ET

I totally agree with this. I'm afraid it will backfire. Sexism survives only so long in the blatent media before it opens up a revolution like we've never seen. I've already heard from Clinton supporters who refuse to vote for Obama because of it. And the dimwitted liberal women who are "insulted" by a successful repub woman getting the nod are underestimating everything they have claimed to support prior to 2008. It's so OBVIOUS!

John B. From New Hampshire   September 3rd, 2008 12:53 pm ET

senoir advisor to bush's '04 campaign.... and they're NOT more of the same?!?! Gimme a break!!!!!!!!!!! PAnder, lie, cheat, scare and steal... the good ol' republican way!

Pier Giacalone   September 3rd, 2008 12:53 pm ET

So, after a "long and thorough search" they chose some one with only 2 years "executive" experience in one of the least populous states in the nation who is currently under investigation and who's own family exhibits the absurdity of standing against birth control and sex education in high schools.

Right to Lifers get so wound up about abortion that they forget that the real problem is kids getting pregnant in the first place. But that's ok, an old-style shotgun wedding makes it all better, right?

The more McCain's people insist that Palin was a well-considered choice, the more they expose how awful their judgment is. It's a given that Palin as President would be a disaster for the country, what this choice really shows is, so would McCain.

Obama/Biden 08!

Koolaide Drinkin' Liberal   September 3rd, 2008 12:53 pm ET

But, but, but – the Down Syndrome Baby is really Bristol's! I know it is! I read it on DailyKos!

Paula   September 3rd, 2008 12:53 pm ET

I just finished watching cnn, some gal named Obrian? She and the whole cnn broadcast crew need to register as agents of Obama. This woman was sickenly one sided.

Visitor   September 3rd, 2008 12:53 pm ET

Steve Schmidt is a protege of Karl Rove and will use the same nastiness to divide the country into voting factions.

randy   September 3rd, 2008 12:53 pm ET

I have never been more disgusted by what is going on in my life. Media members have finally put the stake in there own heart. How many of these anchors have children? I know its not hard to interview people who actually do things but still.

Rovian Tactics   September 3rd, 2008 12:53 pm ET

Every time I have to look at Karl Rove's stupid face, I say "Why isn't he in jail?"

Midge from Ohio   September 3rd, 2008 12:53 pm ET

The media needs to lay off, they are getting to ALL be like the Enquirer.

redneck   September 3rd, 2008 12:53 pm ET

Sarah McPalin accused senator Clinton and her supporters of whining. What about McCain whose middle name is whiner accusing the media to be biased like they have no right to try to find out exactly who is McPalin this illustrious unknown. In the whiners' family their rank is # 1.
12:53pm

Tom   September 3rd, 2008 12:52 pm ET

Steve Schmidt must be delusional. It was a stupid pick for VP. Palin is only "saintly" in the eyes of GOP right wing evangelicals.

Vinson   September 3rd, 2008 12:52 pm ET

Republicans:

BOOO-HOOOO-HOOOO!!!! Stop saying bad things about Palin!!!! You're hurting our feelings!!!!

WAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!

What a bunch of crybabies. If Barack picked Hillary for VP, you couldn't even BEGIN to realize the unimaginable sexist remarks that Republicans would have made.

They're such hypocrites. Watch them NOT respond to this post!!!!

Sick of the Lies   September 3rd, 2008 12:52 pm ET

Really? ... That is interesting Mr. McCain.
Does her alliance with the AIP add in her "experience" that you so seek? Oh right, you deny she is a member? Unfortunately there is video...that darned technology again. I suggest you find someone that is tech literate to help you navigate the world of public information. While you are at it, take a look at her speaking before her church. Reform is one thing Mr McCain....advocating treason and delusions of grandeur to fulfill fanatic prophecies is not the the "reform" AMERICA (which includes Alaska) needs.
Enough.

Eddie   September 3rd, 2008 12:52 pm ET

The media did the same to Hillary Clinton.

At least the media is not politically bias, just sexist.

zelda gross   September 3rd, 2008 12:52 pm ET

I am not of the media. I think she is SERIOUSLY FLAWED. Enough is enough!

matt   September 3rd, 2008 12:52 pm ET

Typical, the so called liberals attacking and making up BS stories. I've never seen more hypocritical people in my life. Just look at the violence at the GOP convention yesterday. Did you see that type of stuff going on at the DNC? No, because Republicans let them have their convention without incident. Yet so called liberal people wanting peace had to attack GOP delegates some of which were in their 70's and 80's at the Republican convention. You people make me sick.

scarey   September 3rd, 2008 12:52 pm ET

Jeez, is the current definition of a Republican some form of subhuman life from another planet where survival means LYING. CONTRIVING, TWISTING, and SUBJECTING your fellows to harm and danger? Guess so - sure was the case last night.... wonder where they parked their spooky little space craft!

Republican Mephisto   September 3rd, 2008 12:52 pm ET

She's not qualified, and that's that. She's never held a position that dealt with national issues. She's never "managed' anything but a small population base. She was clearly chosen as a quick attempt to entice Hillary voters, and in the process has been shown to be woefully unprepared for such a high profile position. This isn't the media attacking her credentials, it's the American people, and we have every right to question whether someone is fit to be the second in command of the most powerful nation on the planet....and she just doesn't cut the mustard.

go away mongers- Ventura ca   September 3rd, 2008 12:52 pm ET

Maybe they're correct? Everyone knows the gop is the champ at faux scandals!! I think they might have even invented them! Is Kommandant Karl around?

Jamie -- Asheville, NC   September 3rd, 2008 12:52 pm ET

Palin was put on the VP shortlist after having met McCain in person only once, several months ago? How could she have been properly vetted when McCain's first or second phone conversation with her was to offer her the job?

It all sounds rather fishy to me...

NT   September 3rd, 2008 12:52 pm ET

No, the media is just doing their job. Palin brought all of this scandal to the media and they are just responding. It has nothing to do with her being the 'first republician VP nominee' and as a woman it offends me that the McCain campaign would use that arguement. Don't say that the media is attacking her because she is a woman. The media raked Obama and Hillary–who is a woman by the way–over the coals-fair is fair. It is just a shame she CHOSE to put her daughter in the media spotlight. I am sure before it is over and done we will find out more about Palin then we want to know. Maybe the McCain camp should have 'vetted' her first.

Andrew (Toronto, Ontario)   September 3rd, 2008 12:52 pm ET

It's all fun and games until it happens to the Republicans. Their primary news station is "faux media". Perhaps that's where they got the inspiration for "Fox news".

Andrew

MINORITY WOMEN   September 3rd, 2008 12:52 pm ET

THESE GUYS ARE THE SAME GUYS WHO LOVED IT WHEN THIS WAS HAPPENING TO OBAMA. NOW THAT THE TABLES HAVE TURNED THEY DONT LIKE IT.

MCSAME YOU ARE GOING DOWN

YOU SHOULD HAVE VETTED THIS WOMAN

Lorenzo from Atlanta   September 3rd, 2008 12:52 pm ET

Give me a break! This is the best the republicans can do. They appoint an unqualified person for vp so when people ask about her experience, they cry sexism. Let's put this lady in front of the news for 30 minutes so she can answer questions McSame. Palin is about as transparent as a brick wall.

Nick Wright   September 3rd, 2008 12:52 pm ET

You transparent, unabashedly shameful brigands. First you manufacture a story to take the news media's attention away from the fact that you're nominating the least experienced VP candidate in modern history by leaking the pregnancy bit, and now you play the victim card. This is a sad time for our nation.

Enough Jokes   September 3rd, 2008 12:52 pm ET

So its the media's fault that NO ONE in the mccain camp said two words that she was even in the running, and our first chance to really "see" who she is is bringing up a TON OF QUESTIONS...and this is "the media trying to destroy her"??????????

seriously folks, listen to this crap and listen good!

Asking questions = trying to destroy.

remember that. NEVER EVER QUESTION. just believe.

yes, 4 more years of the same INDEED

Dean P Valencia Ca   September 3rd, 2008 12:52 pm ET

Maybe the media don't want to destroy her they just want to understand her qualifications.
America would like to know why McCain is putting a teenage pregnancy front and center of his campaign. This highlights everything that is wrong with the Republican party. Preach morals and values and ignore reality. Abstinence doesn't work. Teach your kids sex ed so they don't get pregnant at 17!
They're glorifying teen pregnancy and we'll have McCain/Palin to thank when teenage pregnancies go through the roof.

Dupage Dem   September 3rd, 2008 12:52 pm ET

How can these people say Palin has more experiance than Obama and keep a straight face?

Botox perhaps?

Brian, Texas   September 3rd, 2008 12:51 pm ET

They are running scared. Don't question us!!!! I enjoy the vetting that I'm getting through the news because it appears to be much more thorough than any process that Mr. McCain went through.

Joe   September 3rd, 2008 12:51 pm ET

I also think it's ridiculous that McCain camp has been attacking Obama for his experience, and now that people are attacking Palin's experience it's suddenly sexist, wrong and cruel.

mel   September 3rd, 2008 12:51 pm ET

if mccain wants to chose someone who is disastrously underqualified, he should be prepared to deal with the consequences. palin's record speaks for itself, she doesn't need any help from the media to destoy her credibility.

1st time voter   September 3rd, 2008 12:51 pm ET

The "media" now has become a joke. This is the most sickening act i have saw when you drag a child into this, all because you are looking for dirt on a canidate. If you want to go that route, why dont you talk about how Obamas' mother had him when she was unwed. You are trying to find whatever you can to destroy Gov. Palin, when the democratic presidential nominee, cant even put his hand over his heart for the pledge. I mean give me a break, there are more important issues to worry about than her 17 year old duaghter, or her child with down syndrome, bottom line is she is qualified, more so than Biden or Obama both. The media makes me sick, and true journalism is dead.

Les-Wa   September 3rd, 2008 12:51 pm ET

Oh now, please don't say that, according to Obama he has more experience than Palin because he is campaigning for President for almost two years and that makes him good enough for President.

I didn't know campaigning is considered an experience to be counted to be President. I campaigned for Clinton and Kerry, that makes me MORE Presidential than Obama when it comes to experience. I'm also active in my communty and not getting paid to do it, while he work as community organizer in Chicago getting paid to do it.

Bushwhacked in Eugene, OR   September 3rd, 2008 12:51 pm ET

Unfortunately, she doesn't need the media to destroy her. She dug her own hole and now those nasty facts are coming back to bite her.

Truth hurts, at times.

mefvhs   September 3rd, 2008 12:51 pm ET

The McCain campaign thinks it's "nonsence" for the American people and the press to question Palin's background and qualifications to become vice president? Basically, we're being told that she's been vetted by McCain and we should just shut up and trust his judgement. I don't know about you, but this is definately not the man and woman I want running our country. Open your eyes America. We're being conned.

Truth Hurts   September 3rd, 2008 12:51 pm ET

high time repubs become humanbeings this is crazzy

Kay from Texas   September 3rd, 2008 12:51 pm ET

This is not about the fact that she's a woman. It's about the fact that she's running for *Vice President* of our country.

Thank goodness the media is vetting this person, and doing it now. Obviously, the McCain campaign doesn't want us to know about any of these things until after the election.

Cecil   September 3rd, 2008 12:51 pm ET

Stop Crying, Welcome To American Politics!

You Want The Media To Handle Her With Kid Gloves.

Sen. Obama Has Gone Through The Same S.

Generation X   September 3rd, 2008 12:51 pm ET

Why is the GOP always crying? We the American people have already started vetting Ms. Palin!!! What a joke. lol

Gail   September 3rd, 2008 12:51 pm ET

This isn't going away Schmidt.

VRM   September 3rd, 2008 12:51 pm ET

She isn't even prepared to DISCUSS, let alone lead anyone on the big issues. They have had her holed up for lessons for almost an entire week. They can't be serious with this, right?

Double Standard Much   September 3rd, 2008 12:51 pm ET

Sounds like the Republicans are getting nervous! They don't like the spotlight on their VP and their nominees poor decision making. They would rather us focus on Barack's flag pin. HA! They must think we were dreaming for the past 8 years.... REPUBLICANS we remember! We remember the lies, deception, and double talk... We remember and will remember November 5th. Just wait and see..

Chris   September 3rd, 2008 12:51 pm ET

People including the media tried to tear down Senator Obama with rumors an innuendo so don't even go there. It happens, so suck it up.

Angela   September 3rd, 2008 12:51 pm ET

Funny that it was ok for McCain (TV ads against : thought it was a joke) and the right media to try to destroy Obama but now they cry when people criticize McCain’s VP pick.

From what McCain said, his VP pick just doesn’t make any sense!!!

Please ask McCain’s people why has it been ok to attack Obama & Michelle(1 hour of right wing media and you will know what I mean)

……..mcCain thought it was all a big joke!

Ryan, Denver   September 3rd, 2008 12:51 pm ET

Uh no actually its' her extremist if not criminal record that is destroying her – for once the media might be doing its' job by reporting it.

Leah   September 3rd, 2008 12:51 pm ET

Yeh Right!
Just because the republican camp couldn't come up with a better answer for the reporters, and now the come up with this kind of comment?

It is Americans right to know, if we get the right person or not.

Media is doing a good job at finding the right answer for Americans People so keep it up!

Edna, MI   September 3rd, 2008 12:51 pm ET

A hothead and a beauty queen. Just what we need to put the country back together. Brilliant Repugs.

kamenwati   September 3rd, 2008 12:50 pm ET

Pathetic. McCain has now turned on the media he once touted as his base because it has finally grown a spine and started asking tough question about his judgement or lack thereof in choosing Palin for his running mate. Brilliant strategy McCain, blame the media for your failure to properly vet the person who will be one heartbeat away from the Presidency should the American people be foolish enough to send another incompetent Republican warmonger to the White House. I hope the media continues to ask the relevant questions about McCain and his previously unknown choice for V.P. The facts about McCain's lack of judgement in making his first executive decision should be fully reported to the public.

PB   September 3rd, 2008 12:50 pm ET

Seroiusly? Are we supposed to feel bad for McCain and Palin? I mean, I guess it is unfair for the American public to demand to know anything about their potential Vice President.

I suppose if Palin had her way, she would just ban all the inconvenient facts about her life in public service, the same way she wanted to ban books from her local library. Because that's what we need, another four years of backwards thinking in America. Can't wait.

Same old GOP tactics. No way! No how! No McCain... or Palin!

Rich   September 3rd, 2008 12:50 pm ET

Someone has to vet her. She is a stranger to most of us.

Truth Hurts   September 3rd, 2008 12:50 pm ET

this is being insane that's all I can say.

The Obnoxious American   September 3rd, 2008 12:50 pm ET

Well said Schmidt. This IS a faux contraversy. I am voting McCain but I watched the coverage of the DNC and now the RNC. What a huge difference in coverage. All the pundits can talk about, it seems, is Palin's 17 year old daughter. If I didn't know any better, I'd guess that the liberal media is scared that this choice of Palin might actually hurt Obama's chances, hence this ugly, sexist, and unfair coverage of Palin.

Jim in Virginia   September 3rd, 2008 12:50 pm ET

The media doesn't have to destroy Palin, she is doing the job very well herself. And in the process, she is showing that the Republicans haven't changed at all – as long as you are on the radical right side of the issues of abortion, guns, and "family values" then nothing else matters.

Observer   September 3rd, 2008 12:50 pm ET

I read in an AP article this morning that said Palin, as a part of her vetting process, answered a 70-question survey from the McCain camp. According to the AP, questions included, "Have you ever paid for sex?; Have you been faithful in your marriage?; Have you ever downloaded pornography?" What a thorough and complete vetting process! So, did they actually interview anyone in Alaska? I think most employers do a better job of contacting references for potential employees than McCain does. Do you really want him choosing people for high-ranking positions in our government?
Wait a minute–maybe that's not so bad after all....Hey Mr. McCain, can I be Secretary of State?

amy   September 3rd, 2008 12:50 pm ET

John McCain should be ashamed of himself. This is an immoral choice. To put our country in the hands of a person with zero foreign policy experience and then to have the nerve to claim she has more experience then Obama. She doesn't even know what the Vice President does!!!!

This reflects poorly on John McCain's judgement. He's no maverick. He's a coward. Scared of the right wing of his party. He wanted to be president more than he cares about the country.

The signs should read "McCain First" instead of "Country First."

Ken Pittsburgh   September 3rd, 2008 12:50 pm ET

Welcome to the world of big time politics fellas and lady

janet, ohio   September 3rd, 2008 12:50 pm ET

Sarah Palin has consistently and successfully stood against corruption in the Republican Party. "It takes a great deal of courage to stand up to one's enemies; and a great deal more to stand up to one's friends." (J.K. Rowling, in Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone)

Nunya   September 3rd, 2008 12:50 pm ET

The hypocrisy is mindboggling. Only someone truly demented could convince themselves that Palin is *more* qualified than Obama.

galz   September 3rd, 2008 12:50 pm ET

Wow seems the top of the ticket needs a binky to!

rodeo   September 3rd, 2008 12:50 pm ET

This is not about Sarah Palin, it's about McCain's abysmal judgement and his inability to control his own party. Not good recommendations for his term as a President.
Issues matter, Sarah's issues are so far to the lunatic fringe that she (ad hominem) has become a surrogate for her positions. Most of the drivel that's come out is irrelevant to the campaign, and is being used by the Republicans to cover for the horrible choice McCain made for the nation.

Old McGovern Democrat   September 3rd, 2008 12:49 pm ET

After more than 16 years of Clinton bashing, the Republicans are concerned about the media attacks on personal lives? Get real! Can you imagine the outcry if Chelsea had become pregnant while a teenager? Can you hear the onslaught from Limbaugh, Hannity, Gingrich, Rove, et al, had that happened? The Republicans are doing what they do best: practicing hypocrisy once again. "Do as I say, not as I do." When one runs on family values and abstinence-only sex education, one must expect family scrutiny. Neither the media nor the Democrats thrust this child into the spotlight; John McCain and Sarah Palin did, for they knew about the situation before Sarah accepted the opportunity to run for president-in-waiting. McCain is running on experience and judgment. This has nothing to do with women in the workplace or in politics. It has to do with both McCain's judgment in selecting Palin and her judgment in choosing to run knowing about the personal issues that would be exposed. These questions are fair. Don't be duped again by Republican spin.

alicia   September 3rd, 2008 12:49 pm ET

Is this the same media that wanted to destroy Obama. Give me a break. If I am not mistaken Obama is running against Mcshame. Why do the Republicans insist on comparing her to Obama. They are a bunch of racist nasty people .

Robin   September 3rd, 2008 12:49 pm ET

Gov. Palin is a smart, energetic, principled, strong woman. I cannot wait to vote for her.

Despite any doubts to the contrary on the part of the media, Gov. Palin will serve her country well as vice president. People will look back in wonder that the media was so negative in the beginning. She's a winner.

roger dowdle, lockhart, Tx   September 3rd, 2008 12:49 pm ET

By refusing to answer any more questions about the vetting, they sound as if somebody may let slip that the vetting was minimal. This brings into question the value of McCains experience. All the experience in the world does no good if he continues to "shoot from the hip". And as far as experienc in leading the armed forces, we have only had 3 (4 if you count A.Jackson @ N.O.) who had commanded the military forces before becomming president. Washinton, U.S. Grant (who is not considered very highly of) , and Ike. McCain managed to get shot down, refused repatriation, and made propaganda for the enemy!

Steve   September 3rd, 2008 12:49 pm ET

Oh Lord, the Republicans playing the "old boys' network" card. Beautiful. Especially with the first major-party racial minority running for the Democrats. Barack Obama is part of the old boys' network in Steve Schmidt's world? That's funny, really funny.

Barbara   September 3rd, 2008 12:49 pm ET

Media Scandal, They are only tring to get answers. Answers that McCains Camp is not wantingt to tell. I Am a woman and I would like to now about her, and frankly what i'm hearing about her its not good. I don't think the McCain Camp vetted her properly and now they are just tring to save face. I hope the Media does more to dig up on her, then we will get some answers. Seems if any scandals are going on its McCains camp, by hiding the truth.

Long time Democrat for McCain   September 3rd, 2008 12:49 pm ET

I concur. Leave her alone. I can't believe my fellow Democrats are coming up with these outlandish comments. It was a thorough vetting process. Enough said. At least Palin has her own thoughts and doesn't have to steal speeches from other people.

Rich   September 3rd, 2008 12:49 pm ET

Typical GOP response. Seems to me the investigation was on going prior to the announcement of her for VP.

Perhaps this is the reason for that McCain team going to Alaska, not to further vett her, but to put as much pressure to kill the investigation as legally (and illegally) possible.

Same OLD response, I guess that's why they call it the Grand Old Party.

Independent   September 3rd, 2008 12:49 pm ET

This is so funny!

The media is just doing what McCain should have done. John McCain met her one time, one time before making her his VP pick. This is not the judgement America needs.

In this case, John McCain did not put country first and he will pay for it.

Tim in NC   September 3rd, 2008 12:49 pm ET

And what the Reps did to Obama FALSELY calling him a Muslim, or a Non-American, the "Rezco-scandal" or attacking HIS wife and family... that was all fine.

If you can't take it, DON'T start it!

Palin is what has sealed my vote for Obama this year, any woman who seesk to limit her own gender-based rights, and seeks to support her own pregnant teenage daughter while slashing funding for programs to help other teenage mothers in Alaska is more than I can stomach.

Yetty for Obama 08!   September 3rd, 2008 12:49 pm ET

FAce it, u guys did a horrible job vetting her!

Jarhead   September 3rd, 2008 12:49 pm ET

The liberal/socialist media–the same one who would tuck our national tails between our legs and crawl home from Iraq–the same group who did not and will not ask the tough questions about Obama–these are the same spineless, dispicable slime balls who will, without hesitation, attack a 17 year old kid in hopes of scoring points against her Mother.

SONGBIRD MCCAIN   September 3rd, 2008 12:49 pm ET

Really? Clear and legitimate questions just get dismissed as sexism? What a load of moose flop. This candidate is so flawed that it is more than reasonable to call McCain's judgment into question. The list of her "issues" gets longer every day. So if McCain knew about these problems and ignored them, he failed. And if he did not know about them and is now lying to us that he did, he again failed. Either way, true fiscally conservative republicans have only one legitimate choice: Ron Paul.

Delores   September 3rd, 2008 12:49 pm ET

Finally, someone with some guts to tell the truth. The media hates missing it, but more importantly, they are financially invested in Obama, so they will be biased against anyone else.

JImmy in California   September 3rd, 2008 12:49 pm ET

The Media cracked hard on Clinton and McCain's mouth was shut tight. Now that the media is coming down on Palin doing the vetting his campaign did not do, he is crying foul. He is upset and probably down right mad. TOUGH. Suck it up and move on. The media smells blood and like a shark in the water, they go for it. Senator McCain you and no other politician can control the media. This is good and evident by the fact that without the presence of the media you and your campaign would drive this woman down the throats of voting Americans simply because you feel she is right for our country. Problem Sir, is that you are not the only American in this country.

June, SD   September 3rd, 2008 12:48 pm ET

Vetting is vetting, and if she can't stand the heat get the hell out of the political kitchen.

Chuck A.   September 3rd, 2008 12:48 pm ET

I have never bought into the "liberal media bias" until now. The unbelievably biased questions and comments from Katie Couric, Campbell Brown and others clearly demonstrate that their interest is no longer in reporting the truth. Rather, they see their job as destroying any serious challenger to Senator Obama.

By the way, I am a lifelong Democrat that will not be voting that way in November. The media's treatment of Senator Obama is causing me and a lot of others to move away from him. Their attempts to destroy Governor Palin push me farther away. What happened to reporting the news and letting us decide what to believe or follow?

There are those in the media who are demanding that Gov Palin and her infant son submit to paternity testing to prove that he is hers. The belief is that her 17 year old daughter had that child, and Gov Palin faked her pregnancy. Now to anyone with a shred of intelligence, this is not possible considering that her daughter is 5 months pregnant and the infant is 4 months old. But that isn't stopping people from proposing this stupid scenario.

It is time for the traditional media to get back to the basics of reporting the news, not spreading rumors and insinuations.

steveH   September 3rd, 2008 12:48 pm ET

I find it quite interesting that the media is trying to "destroy the first female Republican nominee for Vice President" by questioning her past, vetting process, qualifications ect. However, when Obama was questioned about Rev Wright, they were legitimate questions. If Obama were to say "the media is trying to destroy the first African-American Presidential Candidate" Republicans would accuse him of playing the race card, but Republicans have no problem playing the gender card here. If this candidate is has been thoroughly vetted, I'm sure they would have nothing to hide......

The hypocrisy of the Republican party is ASTONISHING.

All the Kings Horses and All the Kings Men Couldn't Put Fallen Little Miss Ice Chip Together Again!   September 3rd, 2008 12:48 pm ET

She's doing a fine job on her own without the help of the media. You can't put up a corrupt, unknown extremist and expect her to sail through exempt from any scrutiny a nominee has to bear.

Is she whining arleady? Wimpy and not tough enough to be second in command. John McCain the 72-year-old who acts like he's a 2-year-old.

jorge   September 3rd, 2008 12:48 pm ET

boo hoo hoo...leave me alone sulk sulk

Seriously   September 3rd, 2008 12:48 pm ET

And McCain knew all about this stuff.... Did the American people know... No... It took rumors to make them talk... How sad?

Bobby, Triangle, VA   September 3rd, 2008 12:48 pm ET

You got that right Mr. Schmidt! The American people will have they say about John McCain's vetting process on Election Day when he lose to Barack Obama!!!!

Mr. Schmidt, you are a complete idiot, just like your republican candidate!

jas60   September 3rd, 2008 12:48 pm ET

Folks, this is not hard to distinguish:

Questioning Governor Palin's experience, qualifications, and participation in unethical activities = Not Sexist

Questioning Governor Palin's family life, attention to career versus children, or children's circumstances = Sexist.

Questioning Senator McCain's judgment and adherence to his own pledge to put country first and select the most qualified person for VP: legitimate.

Wondering what happened to the Senator McCain I used to admire and respect: not a media question, but something I am pondering for myself . . .

Speechless   September 3rd, 2008 12:48 pm ET

Enough is enough republicans! The people of this country and the media are not trying to destroy Palin and are not sexist because they are questioning Palin's experience and ethics!!! There is no media conspiracy. The questions and concerns being raised are completely legitimate. If you are going to steal the traditionally democratic concerns of racism and sexism then you should learn to apply them correctly. Questioning the experience of a woman or a black person is not automatically sexist or racist. Stop hiding behind BS and start defending Palin's experience and ethics – that is, if you can without getting laughed at.

Rob   September 3rd, 2008 12:48 pm ET

What's interesting is that Obama has had everything thrown at him by everyone, escpecially those on the right. But somehow it is unfair, biased, and sexist to ask questions of who this possible VP of the USA is and what process was used in the selection. Extremely hypocritical, as usual.

John K   September 3rd, 2008 12:48 pm ET

Its true that many in the media, most especially written, love an allegation, the more sensational,the better. I have suffered this fate and I know firsthand how they can try, if they want to, to ruin someone, with no regard to the credibility of what they are reporting.
So, I am sympathetic, but there are enough valid reasons not to vote for her, or the Republican ticket.

Linda from Prescott AZ   September 3rd, 2008 12:47 pm ET

What on earth does Senator Obama and his record have to do with Palin, not a thing. Quit blaming everything on everyone else. Obama has been scrutinized down to his toes and you folks have smeared him relentlessly. People do not know this woman they are bound to ask questions.
Why do you right away say people are trying to destroy her? The republicans have destroyed or tried to destroy many a political career,
including your nominee for president. So shut the hell up anhd get over yourselves.

Fenarkleman   September 3rd, 2008 12:47 pm ET

Oh, and they always trot out a bullet-headed bald guy who is intimidating and wears a big, fat college graduation ring on his finger to try to "scare" people into agreeing with them.

Not gonna work this time, Kojak.

Dexter in Houston TX   September 3rd, 2008 12:47 pm ET

Give me a break, the Republicans are simply looking for someone to blame for the mistake they made. The media is doing what the media has always done. Bottom line is we only have a 2 month window to learn more about Palin. I commend the media for shining a light on her. Like it or not. The Republicans have left the media no choice.

DX in TX

Cathy Lee   September 3rd, 2008 12:47 pm ET

Who is the media to judge anyone???? And really who believes anything they report anyway. They either leave out part of the truth or distort the news to get the best rating. Things are not always as they report it. If the media would talk about the issues and leave the personal information out of it. Let's all dig into their backgrounds and see what we can come up with.